THE CHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO SMOKE
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 1
11/24/08...
69 downloads
802 Views
55MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
THE CHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO SMOKE
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 1
11/24/08 3:16:26 PM
THE CHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO SMOKE Alan Rodgman Thomas A. Perfetti
Boca Raton London New York
CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 3
11/24/08 3:16:28 PM
CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-7883-1 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rodgman, Alan. The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke / Alan Rodgman and Thomas A. Perfetti. p. ; cm. “A CRC title.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4200-7883-1 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Tobacco--Composition. 2. Tobacco smoke--Composition. I. Perfetti, Thomas Albert, 1952- II. Title. [DNLM: 1. Smoke--adverse effects. 2. Tobacco--chemistry. 3. Smoking--adverse effects. 4. Tobacco--adverse effects. WA 754 R691c 2009] SB275.R63 2009 613.85--dc22
2008018913
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at http://www.taylorandfrancis.com and the CRC Press Web site at http://www.crcpress.com
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 4
11/24/08 3:16:29 PM
Table of Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................................................................ xi The Authors ...............................................................................................................................................................................xiii List of Tables.............................................................................................................................................................................xvii List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................................... xxv Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................................xxvii Chapter 1 The Hydrocarbons ................................................................................................................................................. 1 I.A The Alkanes......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I.B The Alkenes and Alkynes ................................................................................................................................................... 7 I.C The Alicyclic Hydrocarbons.............................................................................................................................................. 36 I.D The Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons ......................................................................................................................... 47 I.E The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons............................................................................................................................ 55 I.F Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................... 102 Chapter 2
Alcohols and Phytosterols ..................................................................................................................................111
II.A Alcohols............................................................................................................................................................................111 II.B Phytosterols.......................................................................................................................................................................115 Chapter 3 Aldehydes and Ketones ..................................................................................................................................... 215 The Assertion of Aldehydes and Ketones as Ciliastatic Tobacco Smoke Components ........................................................... 221 Ciliastasis Studies with Cigarette Smoke Condensate Fractions.............................................................................................. 226 Ciliastasis Studies With Individual Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Components ..................................................................... 226 Nose Inhalation of Environmental Tobacco Smoke vs. Mouth Inhalation of Mainstream Smoke .......................................... 227 Chapter 4 Carboxylic Acids .................................................................................................................................................317 IV.A The Carboxylic Acids .......................................................................................................................................................317 IV.B The Amino Acids and Related Compounds .....................................................................................................................318 Chapter 5 The Esters........................................................................................................................................................... 381 Chapter 6 The Lactones ...................................................................................................................................................... 439 Chapter 7
Anhydrides ......................................................................................................................................................... 461
Chapter 8 Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives ............................................................................................................. 465 Chapter 9 Phenols and Quinones ....................................................................................................................................... 487 IX.A Phenols .......................................................................................................................................................................... 487 IX.A.1 Identification and Quantitation of Phenols in Cigarette MSS ....................................................................... 492 IX.A.2 Bioassays to Determine the Contribution of Phenols to Cigarette Smoke Condensate Tumorigenicity ........................................................................................................................... 495 IX.A.3 Determination of the Nature of the Precursors in Tobacco of the Phenols in Mainstream Smoke.................................................................................................................................... 501 IX.A.4 The Effect of Cigarette Design Parameters on Yield of Mainstream Smoke Phenols .................................. 507 IX.B Quinones ....................................................................................................................................................................... 547
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 5
11/24/08 3:16:29 PM
Chapter 10 The Ethers ........................................................................................................................................................ 555 Overall Summary of Oxygen-Containing Components of Tobacco and/or Smoke: Chapters 2 through 10 ........................... 555 Chapter 11
Nitriles................................................................................................................................................................615
Chapter 12
Acyclic Amines ................................................................................................................................................. 627
Chapter 13
Amides .............................................................................................................................................................. 663
Chapter 14
Imides................................................................................................................................................................ 679
Chapter 15 N-Nitrosamines ................................................................................................................................................ 687 XV.A XV.B XV.C XV.D XV.E XV.F XV.G XV.H
Volatile N-Nitrosamines........................................................................................................................................... 691 Nonvolatile N-Nitrosamines..................................................................................................................................... 691 Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines ........................................................................................................................... 699 N-Nitrosamino Acids ............................................................................................................................................... 704 Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines: An Exception among the Major MSS Toxicants ............................................. 707 Direct Transfer of TSNAs from Tobacco vs. Their Formation during the Smoking Process ................................. 708 Infrequently Studied Tobacco and/or Smoke Secondary Amines and Their N-Nitrosamines................................ 708 Flue-Curing and Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines................................................................................................ 712
Chapter 16 Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols ............................................................................................... 721 Chapter 17 XVII.A
XVII.B
XVII.C XVII.D
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components................................................................................................................ 727
Monocyclic Four- and Five-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds ............................................................... 727 XVII.A.1 Background........................................................................................................................................... 727 XVII.A.2 Four-Membered N-Containing Rings................................................................................................... 727 XVII.A.3 Five-Membered N-Containing Rings ................................................................................................... 727 XVII.A.4 Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke With Multiple Five-Membered N-Containing Rings ................................................................................................... 732 Monocyclic Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds.................................................................................. 747 XVII.B.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 747 XVII.B.2 Biosynthesis of Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds and the Five- and Six-Membered and Multiple Six-Membered Nitrogen Heterocycles of Tobacco................. 748 XVII.B.3 Other Means for the Formation of the Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds Found in Tobacco ................................................................................................................................. 750 XVII.B.4 Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke................................751 XVII.B.4.1 Piperidine and the Tetra- and Dihydropyridines ............................................................ 752 XVII.B.4.2 Pyridines ......................................................................................................................... 752 XVII.B.4.3 Pyrazines..........................................................................................................................753 XVII.B.4.4 Pyrimidines..................................................................................................................... 754 XVII.B.5 Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Containing a Five-Membered and a Six-Membered N-Containing Ring............................................................................................. 779 XVII.B.5.1 Nicotine and Tobacco Alkaloids with a Six-Membered N-Containing Ring and a Second Five-Membered N-Containing Ring ........................................................ 780 XVII.B.5.2 Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke with Two or More Six-Membered N-Containing Rings ........................................................................................................ 790 Lactams .................................................................................................................................................................... 798 Oxazoles and Oxazines............................................................................................................................................ 798
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 6
11/24/08 3:16:30 PM
XVII.E XVII.F
Aza-Arenes............................................................................................................................................................... 806 XVII.E.1 Alternate Exposures to Aza-Arenes ......................................................................................................818 N-Heterocyclic Amines............................................................................................................................................ 834
Chapter 18 Miscellaneous Components............................................................................................................................. 855 XVIII.A Sulfur-Containing Components ............................................................................................................................... 855 XVIII.B Halogenated Components ........................................................................................................................................ 857 Chapter 19 XIX.A
Fixed and Variable Gases................................................................................................................................ 893
Analytical Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 895 XIX.A.1 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) ............................................................................ 896 XIX.A.2 Nitrogen Oxides (NO, NO2, N2O, NOx) ............................................................................................... 896 XIX.A.3 Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN).................................................................................................................... 896 XIX.A.4 Ammonia (NH3) ................................................................................................................................... 897
Chapter 20 Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts.................................................................... 907 XX.A
XX.B XX.C
XX.D
Elements, Isotopes, and Ions in Plants..................................................................................................................... 907 XX.A.1 Elements, Isotopes, and Ions in Tobacco.............................................................................................. 907 XX.A.2 Elements, Isotopes, and Ions in Tobacco Smoke...................................................................................910 Methods for the Detection and Identification of Metals, Ions, and Isotopes in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke ..................................................................................................................................................911 The Transference of Elements, Isotopes, and Ions from Tobacco to Tobacco Smoke............................................. 912 XX.C.1 Elements in Tobacco Smoke of Special Interest................................................................................... 912 XX.C.1.a Arsenic (As) .................................................................................................................... 913 XX.C.1.b Beryllium (Be) ................................................................................................................ 915 XX.C.1.c Chromium (Cr), Cadmium (Cd), and Lead (Pb) ............................................................. 915 XX.C.1.d Chromium VI [Cr (VI)] .................................................................................................. 915 XX.C.1.e Nickel (Ni) ...................................................................................................................... 915 XX.C.1.f Cobalt (Co) ...................................................................................................................... 915 XX.C.1.g Mercury (Hg) ...................................................................................................................916 XX.C.1.h Selenium (Se) ...................................................................................................................916 210Polonium (210Po) ...........................................................................................................916 XX.C.1.i Summary...................................................................................................................................................................916
Chapter 21 Pesticides and Growth Regulators ................................................................................................................. 933 XXI.A XXI.B XXI.C XXI.D XXI.E XXI.F
Synthetic Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulator Residues on Tobacco................................................................. 934 Naturally Occurring Plant Growth Regulators and Pesticides in Tobacco.............................................................. 935 Transfer Rates of Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators to MSS ........................................................................ 936 Decomposition Products of Agrochemicals in Mainstream Smoke ........................................................................ 937 Methods for Analysis of Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators .......................................................................... 938 Residues of Synthetic Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators Identified in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke............................................................................................................................... 938
Chapter 22 XXII.A XXII.B XXII.C
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes.................................................................................................................. 977
General Discussion of Genetics ............................................................................................................................... 977 Tobacco Genetics ..................................................................................................................................................... 978 Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes Identified in Tobacco ........................................................................................ 979 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................... 982
Chapter 23 “Hoffmann Analytes” ................................................................................................................................... 1001
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 7
11/24/08 3:16:30 PM
Chapter 24
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients ...........................................1053
Acknowledgment.....................................................................................................................................................1106 Chapter 25 Pyrolysis...........................................................................................................................................................1107 XXV.A XXV.B XXV.C
XXV.D
XXV.E XXV.F
Individual Tobacco Types ....................................................................................................................................... 1111 Extracts from Tobacco ............................................................................................................................................1112 Individual Tobacco Components.............................................................................................................................1115 XXV.C.1 Nicotine ...............................................................................................................................................1116 XXV.C.2 Organic Solvent-Soluble Components (Long-Chained Aliphatic Hydrocarbons, Phytosterols, Solanesol, High Molecular Weight Esters, etc.) ............................................................1118 XXV.C.3 Structural Components of Tobacco (Cellulose, Lignin, Pectins, etc.)................................................ 1124 XXV.C.4 Acids....................................................................................................................................................1129 XXV.C.5 Proteins and Amino Acids ..................................................................................................................1130 Tobacco Additives ...................................................................................................................................................1134 XXV.D.1. Additives Used in Tobacco Production ...............................................................................................1134 XXV.D.1.a Sucker Growth Inhibitors...............................................................................................1134 XXV.D.1.b Pesticides........................................................................................................................1137 XXV.D.2 Additives Used in Cigarette Manufacture ...........................................................................................1139 XXV.D.2.a Casing Materials (Sugars, Cocoa, Licorice)..................................................................1139 XXV.D.2.b Humectants (Glycerol, Propylene Glycol).....................................................................1140 Cigarette Construction Materials (Paper, Adhesives, etc.) .....................................................................................1141 Flavoring Ingredients ..............................................................................................................................................1142
Chapter 26
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens.............1173
XXVI.A Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens ...............................................................................................................1173 XXVI.A.1 The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons .............................................................................................1182 XXVI.A.2 Other Classes of Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens ................................................................1183 XXVI.A.2.a Aza-Arenes..................................................................................................................1183 XXVI.A.2.b N-Nitrosamines............................................................................................................1189 XXVI.A.2.c N-Heterocyclic Amines ...............................................................................................1190 XXVI.B Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens .....................................................................................................1193 XXVI.B.1 Alternate Exposures to Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens......................................................1218 XXVI.B.1.a Alternate Exposures to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.......................................1219 XXVI.B.1.b Alternate Exposures to Aza-Arenes ........................................................................... 1223 XXVI.B.1.c Alternate Exposures to N-Nitrosamines..................................................................... 1223 XXVI.B.1.d Alternate Exposures to N-Heterocyclic Amines .........................................................1231 XXVI.C Summary................................................................................................................................................................ 1233 Chapter 27 Free Radicals.................................................................................................................................................. 1235 XXVII.A XXVII.B XXVII.C XXVII.D XXVII.E
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1235 Analytical Methods for Determination of Free Radicals .................................................................................... 1236 Free Radicals in Tobacco Smoke......................................................................................................................... 1237 Historical Review of Free Radical Research on Cigarette Smoke ...................................................................... 1238 Proposed Mechanisms for the Generation of Free Radicals in MSS .................................................................. 1250
Chapter 28
Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 1257
Bibliography ...........................................................................................................................................................................1261 Alphabetical Component Index ........................................................................................................................................... 1483
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 8
11/24/08 3:16:30 PM
Foreword The following pages are an attempt to update a situation with regard to the composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke that has existed for almost four decades. Although it is suspected that the chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke may have been cataloged in-house at various U.S. and foreign tobacco companies as well as by various governmental agencies, no such catalog has been published since the 1968 review by the highly competent tobacco scientist R.L. Stedman of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (3797). One article published by a tobacco company prior to that of Stedman was a 1963 referenced monograph on tobacco and tobacco smoke components by Philip Morris, Inc. (2939). Its monograph was submitted to the 1964 Advisory Committee for use in preparation of its 1964 report to the U.S. Surgeon General. The Philip Morris monograph had been preceded by the 1959 published review by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971). In subsequent years, several tobacco and tobacco smoke publications dealt with specific types or classes of components, for example, the 1964 compilation of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tobacco smoke by Elmenhorst and Reckzeh (1139), the 1969 review by Neurath on the nitrogen-containing components identified in tobacco smoke (2724), and the 1977 review by Schmeltz and Hoffmann on the nitrogen-containing components in both tobacco and tobacco smoke (3491). Several catalogs of the chemical components of only tobacco smoke have been published, for example, the 1954 article by Kosak (2170), but the most recent one was that of Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) in 1980. Since the 1968 Stedman article in which about 1200 tobacco and smoke components were listed, the number of identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components has increased sevenfold to almost 8400, a number that includes only about 500 of the many thousands of enzymes identified in the tobacco plant. The references cited for a particular tobacco and/or tobacco smoke component may deal with its identification or with a variety of topics pertinent to the particular component. Topics may include such simple items as the isolation and identification of a component, its characterization by classical chemical means, for example, the definition of the structure of solanesol isolated from flue-cured tobacco by Rowland et al. (3359), or the characterization of a component by spectrographic means, for example, UV, IR, NMR, MS, and chromatographic retention time. One example is the identification by Snook et al. of many PAHs (3756–3758) and aza-arenes (3750) in cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS). Many references cited herein describe the search for and elucidation of the precursor in tobacco of a particular component in cigarette MSS (3616), for example, the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon precursors of the PAHs, including benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P); the quantitation of the component on a per gram of tobacco basis or on its per cigarette MSS
yield, particularly if the component is considered a health problem; the improvements/developments in analytical technology to determine the per cigarette MSS and/or sidestream smoke (SSS) yield of the component. Also included in citations for a particular MSS, SSS, and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) component are the publications of results of experimental studies on its biological activity plus discussions and/or assertions of its toxicity and/or tumorigenicity. While their number is much fewer than the opposite point of view, included are references to studies on the inhibition of adverse biological activity of a tobacco smoke component by another smoke component, for example, the inhibition of mouse-skin tumorigenicity of B[a]P by n-hentriacontane and n-pentatriacontane (4314, 4336), the inhibition of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) mutagenicity by nicotine (2327a, 2327b), the inhibition of mouse-skin tumorigenicity of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) by benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) (3814), both classified as significant tobacco smoke tumorigens. Also cited are reports on the controversies over the extrapolation of the biological effect of a specific component administered individually vs. its biological effect when it is the component in a highly complex mixture such as MSS and is administered to a different species, by a different route, and at a dose level far in excess of its level in the complex mixture (1318a, 3300, 3627). Lastly, many studies are cited in which cigarette design technologies were generated to control the per cigarette MSS yield of Federal Trade Commission (FTC)-defined “tar” and one or more specific components of concern, for example, reconstituted tobacco sheet, expanded tobacco, ventilated filters, filter-tip and cigarette paper additives. While some of the citations may seem obscure to a reader newly involved in tobacco and/or smoke research, they are included to elucidate the historical background and relationship to more recent studies, for example, publications pertinent to 2-methyl-1,3-butadiene (isoprene), a fairly plentiful component of the vapor phase of cigarette smoke. The publications include the 1913 report by Staudinger et al. (25A68) that pyrolysis of isoprene yielded a “tar.” In 1918, the procedure to successfully generate tumors by animal skin painting was described (4361). Five years later, Kennaway (2073–2076) demonstrated the tumorigenicity of the pyrolysate “tar” from isoprene, and much later, Badger et al. (143) recorded the PAH content of an isoprene pyrolysate. Another example includes a series of references to the research results reported by Roffo that a tobacco “destructive distillate” was tumorigenic (3322, 3325), contained B[a]P (3316), and the B[a]P content and tumorigenicity of the “destructive distillate” were reduced by organic-solvent extraction of the tobacco prior to destructive distillation (3327).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 9
11/24/08 3:16:30 PM
Our goal was to present to the reader as many pertinent references as we could find for a particular component and permit the reader to decide which references to study. For some components, dozens of references are available, for other components only one or two. The multi-referenced components are usually those considered to be involved in the health problems connected to tobacco smoking. We express our deep appreciation to several scientific staff members of the Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie and the Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International. They reviewed the initial chapter of our opus and made many meaningful suggestions and pointed out the need for several corrections. Most of their input was applied to that chapter and eventually extended to subsequent chapters as we wrote them. One needed correction that was described was a problem with
the electronic address for a specific reference. It was found to be inaccessible at the time of the review. That was corrected since the reference had multiple electronic addresses so the inaccessible one was replaced with an accessible and operative one. However, the finding triggered an examination of all the electronic addresses cited in the Bibliography. Of the nearly 900 such addresses, three more were found to be inaccessible. Fortunately, each was part of a reference with multiple electronic addresses and the inaccessible address for each was replaced with an accessible one. We apologize to the reader for the omission not only of any tobacco or tobacco smoke component from the catalog but also any significant reference by one or more competent investigators who provided information pertinent to one or more specific components.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 10
11/24/08 3:16:31 PM
Acknowledgments During the many years that this tobacco and tobacco smoke component catalog was being prepared, numerous components were discussed with colleagues, many of whom were involved either in tobacco or tobacco smoke research within the tobacco industry or outside of it. Much meaningful information was obtained during the many discussions and such information has been incorporated into our effort. We greatly appreciate the input not only from those colleagues who are still with us but also from those who are not. In the first group, we are extremely grateful to J. Gilbert Ashburn, Edward Bernasek, Fred W. Best, Michael F. Borgerding, N.M. Chopra, Christopher R.E. Coggins, William M. Coleman III, Lawrence C. Cook, James T. Dobbins, Jr., Michael F. Dube, Curt R. Enzell, Charles R. Green, Dietrich Hoffmann, Paul Kotin, Brian M. Lawrence, Chin K. Lee, John C. Leffingwell, Chuan Liu, Robert A. Lloyd, Jr., William C. Luffman, Dwo Lynm, C.D. McGee, Alan B. Norman, Charles W. Nystrom, Michael W. Ogden, John H. Reynolds IV, Charles H. Risner, Charles E. Rix, Joseph N. Schumacher, Stephen B. Sears, Jeffery I. Seeman, Carr J. Smith, Thomas W. Stamey, Jr., David E. Townsend, and Jack L. White.
In the second group, we are grateful for the contributions of the following late colleagues: Richard R. Baker, Stuart A. Bellin, Herbert R. Bentley, Robert H. Cundiff, Wilbur R. Franks, James D. Fredrickson, Jesse A. Giles, Kurt Grob, Robert A. Heckman, Charles H. Keith, Philip H. Latimer, Jr., Anders H. Laurene, Jerry W. Lawson, Larry A. Lyerly, John G. Mason, Marjorie P. Newell, Thomas S. Osdene, Donald L. Roberts, Ralph L. Rowland, Alex W. Spears, William A. Rohde, Fredrick A. Thome, George P. Touey, John J. Whalen, George F Wright, Ernst L. Wynder, and George W. Young. We also wish to express our gratitude to those who, over the years, have provided us with much information on scientific publications and presentations. They include Frank G. Colby, Charles W. Nystrom, Nell W. Sizemore, and the late William W. Menz and John J. Whalen. Particularly meaningful over the past decade has been the information provided by the extremely diligent Helen S. Chung of the R.J. Reynolds R&D Scientific Information Division. One of us (T.A.P.) wishes to especially thank Patricia F. Perfetti for the encouragement and faith she has shown me as my wife, best friend, faithful colleague, and my partner in many happy and productive years of scientific research.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 11
11/24/08 3:16:31 PM
The Authors Thomas A. Perfetti, Ph.D. was born in 1952 in Jeannette, Pennsylvania, the second son of Ruth Peters and Bruno Massimo Perfetti. He was one of five children. Perfetti received his elementary education in several schools in the Pittsburgh area. In 1970, he entered Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP). He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry in 1974. During his stay at IUP he conducted cell transport research with Dr. Richard Hartline and synthesized numerous radiopharmaceuticals. Perfetti’s first publication was on the preferential uptake of d-A-amino adipate by Alcaligens denitrificans in 1975. In 1974, he entered the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (VPI-SU), Blacksburg, VA. His doctoral thesis (1977), under Dr. Michael Ogliaruso, was on the electronic effects associated with the Woodward-Hoffman Rules. While pursuing his doctoral degree in physical organic chemistry, Perfetti worked as a Research Fellow for NASA, taught organic chemistry labs, and tutored undergraduates. In 1976, Perfetti won the President’s Award for Distinguished Teaching at VPI-SU. Perfetti married Patricia Ann Finley, who graduated with him from the Chemistry Department at IUP in 1975. They have two sons, Michael and David. The family now resides in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. In late 1977, Dr. Perfetti joined the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) as a research chemist. There, he initiated several research programs on tobacco and smoke chemistry, cigarette design, sensory science, flavor chemistry, and analytical method development. Perfetti was promoted to Senior Research Chemist (1979), to Senior Staff Scientist (1984), then to Master Scientist (1986), and finally to Principal Scientist (1991). Perfetti is a recognized expert in the areas of nicotine and menthol chemistry and in the area of innovation. As Principal Scientist he worked with R.J. Reynolds-Nabisco and R.J. Reynolds International on corporate program development and program management issues. He also acted as a liaison on patent acquisitions, patent applications, and consulting activities on the scientific aspects of litigation against RJRT. Much of his career was spent in the laboratory, although he served as the manager of several divisions. Dr. Perfetti retired from RJRT in 2003. In that same year, he and his wife started Perfetti & Perfetti, LLC, a scientific consulting firm in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Their company has done quite well, with numerous national and international clients. Perfetti has served as a reviewer for Tobacco Science, the Journal of Food and Chemical Toxicology, and Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International. He has served on several Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference committees and contributed to two of its symposia (1987, 1993), one of which he chaired (1993).
Perfetti is a member of the American Chemical Society (ACS). He has served as assistant historian to the Division of the History of Chemistry. He is a member and Fellow of the American Institute of Chemists and is a Certified Professional Chemist. He was a co-founder and past president of the North Carolina Chromatography Discussion Group and former chairman of the Education Committee of the Central North Carolina Section of the ACS. Dr. Perfetti has been cited in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in Science and Technology, in the International Directory of Distinguished Leadership and Who’s Who in American Leaders in America. In 1993, Dr. Perfetti was presented with the Distinguished Alumni Award, Indiana University of Pennsylvania. In 1995, he and several other RJRT scientists were given the George Land World-Class Innovator Award for outstanding work in instilling the principles of innovation at RJRT Research and Development. Over the last 32 years Perfetti has made over 60 presentations and published numerous papers in peer-reviewed journals in the areas of biochemistry, tobacco and smoke chemistry, sensory perception, mathematics, and innovation. During his career at RJRT he prepared more than 250 formal company research reports. He has written chapters for two books and has developed and presented five courses in the areas of cigarette design and innovation. Dr. Perfetti has 38 U.S. patents and hundreds of foreign patents. Alan Rodgman, M.A., Ph.D. Most of the original text of the following biography was written in 2003 for Alan Rodgman’s nomination for the Tobacco Science Research Conference Lifetime Achievement Award. He was recipient of the 2003 award. In several places, the nominator’s paragraphs have been slightly modified to include additional, more recent information. The author of the 2003 nomination wrote: For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.——Thomas Jefferson, 1820
The words penned long ago by Mr. Jefferson epitomize the life and professional career of Alan Rodgman. For one year short of a half century Dr. Rodgman has been at the forefront of tobacco science. His increasingly rare combination of keen scientific intellect, unceasing productivity, sense of tobacco science history, and unfailing attention to clear, concise, timely communication make him an ideal choice for the Tobacco Science Research Conference’s (TSRC’s) Lifetime Achievement Award. Not only has Dr. Rodgman made his own prodigious, personal scientific contributions to tobacco and smoke chemistry and their related toxicology, but his mentoring of associates and many other tobacco scientists has allowed him to amplify
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 13
11/24/08 3:16:31 PM
his contributions far beyond those capable of any one man. Dr. Rodgman’s professional “family tree” reads as a “Who’s Who” in tobacco science. Alan Rodgman was born in 1924 in Aberdare, Glamorgan County, Wales, to Arch and Margaret Llewellyn Rodgman. The family moved to Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in 1928. There he was educated at the grade and collegiate levels. Because of the early death of his father when Rodgman was ten years old, he worked after school and on Saturdays at the children’s and adult department of a local branch of the Toronto Public Library from 1937 to 1942. In 1945, Rodgman entered the University of Toronto as recipient of the two highest mathematics, physics, and chemistry scholarships awarded in competition in 1942. Because of a University of Toronto rule on retaining no more than two competitive scholarships, a third chemistry and physics scholarship awarded to Rodgman reverted to the next highest candidate. The 3-year period between earning the scholarships and their implementation was spent on active duty as a volunteer in the Royal Canadian Navy during WWII, with service on the North Atlantic Ocean. Between 1945 and 1949 at the University of Toronto, Rodgman was awarded eight additional scholarships, one in mathematics, physics, and chemistry in 1946; seven in chemistry in 1947, 1948, and 1949. His bachelor’s thesis on N-nitrosamines (1949), master’s thesis on kinetics of the original Diels-Alder reaction (1951), and doctoral thesis on oxymercuration-deoxymercuration (1953) were conducted with Dr. George F Wright* as his advisor. He taught the laboratory aspect of analytical chemistry during the first year of his master’s period. His master’s and doctoral research formed part of eleven publications co-authored between 1952 and 1959 with Dr. Wright who, by the way, from 1954 to 1959, preceded Dr. Dietrich Hoffmann as Dr. Ernst L. Wynder’s tobacco smoke chemistry colleague. Rodgman married Doris Curley in June 1947. They have three sons, Eric, Paul, and Mark, three daughters-in-law, Melody, Ella, and Sara, and seven grandchildren. While pursuing his chemistry degrees, Rodgman conducted carcinogenesis and anticarcinogenesis research from 1947 to 1953 during summers, winter evenings, and weekends with Dr. Wilbur R. Franks, Cancer Research Professor at the Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto. He conducted such research fulltime to mid-1954 after receiving his doctorate in June 1953. Rodgman’s first three scientific publications (on anticarcinogenesis) in 1947 and 1948 preceded the receipt of his bachelor’s degree in chemistry in 1949. From 1951 to mid-1954, he also taught organic and physical chemistry plus mathematics for physical chemistry in evening courses sponsored by the Chemical Institute of Canada. In mid-1954, Rodgman joined the Research Department of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company as a senior research chemist. In October 1954, he initiated its program on *
The lack of a period after Dr. Wright’s middle initial is not a typographical error.
cigarette smoke composition, personally conducting the laboratory research until 1967 and actively directing it and environmental tobacco smoke studies thereafter until 1987. Following successive promotions from senior research chemist to section head to division manager, he became director of research in 1976, and after an R&D reorganization in 1980, he was appointed director of fundamental research. Rodgman became a U.S. citizen in 1961. After more than 60 years, Rodgman is still a member of the American Chemical Society and the Chemical Institute of Canada. Until 2006, he had been a member of the New York Academy of Sciences for over 40 years and also a member of Sigma Xi. He served on the editorial board of Tobacco Science as member and Vice-Chairman (1963– 1967); on the editorial board of Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International (1976–1987); on the Industry Technical Committee, Council for Tobacco Research (1955–1960); on the CORESTA Scientific Commission (1982–1985); and on several U.S. government committees, including, the Tobacco Working Group of the National Cancer Institute’s Smoking and Health Program on the Less Hazardous Cigarette (1976–1977) and the U.S. Technical Study Group of the Cigarette Safety Act of 1984 (1984–1987). From 1960 to 1987, Rodgman served on numerous Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference (TCRC) committees. In 1972, he was involved in various aspects of the joint CORESTA/ TCRC Conference in Williamsburg, Virginia. In 1976, he persuaded his company’s management to continue its CORESTA membership. In the early 1980s, when a host site for the 1982 CORESTA Symposium did not materialize, Rodgman was instrumental in arranging for his company to sponsor the symposium in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. He served as its vice chairman. Rodgman was the chairman for the 1984, 38th TCRC symposium entitled “Design of Low-‘Tar’ Cigarettes.” On the occasion of TCRC’s 50th Conference in 1996, he coauthored with Charles R. Green a comprehensive review and presentation entitled “The Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference: A Half Century Forum for Advances in Analytical Methodology of Tobacco and its Products.” The following year at the 51st Conference, he prepared a symposium paper and presentation on “FTC ‘Tar’ and Nicotine in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke: A Retrospective.” In addition, Rodgman has presented many other original research papers at the conference. In the journal Tobacco Science, he has published thirteen scientific papers on tobacco smoke composition. Additionally, the 1986 volume of Tobacco Science was dedicated to Dr. Rodgman to honor his prolific career. In addition to serving as a reviewer for manuscripts submitted to Tobacco Science and Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International, Rodgman has served as a reviewer not only for manuscripts submitted to several other journals, including Recent Advances in Tobacco Science, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, Food and Chemical Toxicology and the Journal of Organic Chemistry but also for the page proofs of several well-known books on tobacco-related topics.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 14
11/24/08 3:16:31 PM
From 1954 to retirement and from retirement to 2004, Rodgman was involved in consulting activities on the scientific aspects of litigation against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Over 13,000 pages of his contributions are available at http://tobaccodocuments.org/bliley_rjr/list. Many of the more recent contributions were the consequence of the “Master Settlement” between the states and tobacco companies. Additionally, he has been a major contributor to the scientific content of Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International both through submitted papers and as a volunteer editor. Dr. Rodgman has mined the wealth of documents previously considered proprietary to clarify the intent and content of tobacco and smoke research conducted by himself, his colleagues, and other scientists. The published papers authored/ co-authored by Rodgman during the last decade and a half include the following: Environmental Tobacco Smoke (1992); FTC “Tar” and Nicotine in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke: A Retrospective (1997); Tobacco Smoke Components (1998); The Composition of Cigarette Smoke: A Retrospective, With Emphasis on Polycyclic Components (2000); “Smoke pH”: A Review (2000); “IARC Group 2A Carcinogens” Reported in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke (2000); Studies of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke: Identification, Tobacco Precursors, Control of Levels: A Review (2001); “IARC Group 2B Carcinogens” Reported in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke (2001); Some Studies of the Effects of Additives on Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Properties. I. Flavorants (2002); Some Studies of the Effects of Additives on Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Properties. II. Casing Materials and Humectants (2002); The Relative Toxicity of Substituted Phenols Reported in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke (2002); The Composition of Cigarette Smoke: Problems With Lists of Tumorigens (2003); Toxic Chemicals in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke: Hazard and Hoopla (2002, 2003); Some Studies of the Effects of Additives on Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Properties. III. Ingredients Reportedly Used in Various Commercial Cigarette Products in the USA and Elsewhere (2004); The Composition of
Cigarette Smoke: A Catalogue of the Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (2006); The Composition of Cigarette Smoke:
A Chronology of the Studies of Four Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (2006); Comparisons of the Composition of Tobacco Smoke and the Smokes from Various Tobacco Substitutes (2007); The Expansion of Tobacco and its Effect on Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Properties (2007). At the 2002 CORESTA Congress held in New Orleans, Dr. Rodgman co-authored with Charles R. Green an invited speaker symposium paper entitled “Toxic Chemicals in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke: Hazard or Hoopla.” In this paper the authors critically examined the proper listing and prioritizing of toxic chemicals in cigarette mainstream smoke. Moreover, the authors pointed to a number of disconcerting chemical and biological limitations in existing knowledge which calls into question the veracity of such listing strategies for their oft-stated purposes. This example is included in Alan Rodgman’s nomination to illustrate his lifelong pursuit of the truth. In summary, there is no question that Alan Rodgman has dedicated his professional life to the achievement of the highest standards for tobacco science. Even with this nomination and the accompanying materials, it is impossible to convey to an outsider the tremendous impact that this person has had on our knowledge of tobacco and its smoke. Although his own personal scientific accomplishments are by themselves worthy of TSRC’s Lifetime Achievement Award, the amplification of his life’s work through influence on many other tobacco scientists is difficult to quantify. Beyond his many professional achievements is a man who is widely respected and personally liked both within and outside the tobacco science community. Because his philosophy on publication authorship differed substantially from that of many academic, government agency, and health organization investigators, Rodgman did not insert his name as co-author on the many articles on tobacco and smoke composition presented at conferences and/or published in peer-reviewed journals by his staff members. If he had done what many supervisors do, his list of publications between 1960 and 1987 would be increased by almost 200. However, his contributions to many of the studies are described in the Acknowledgment section of many of his staff/colleagues’ publications.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 15
11/24/08 3:16:32 PM
List of Tables Chapter 1 The Hydrocarbons I.A-1 Relative percentage composition of tobacco alkanes in tobacco and cigarette smoke, based on mass spectroscopic analysis ...................................................................................................................... 2 I.A-2 Relative percentage composition of n-alkanes in tobacco and cigarette smoke, based on gas-liquid chromatographic analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 2 I.A-3 Alkane content of cigarette mainstream smoke ....................................................................................................... 2 I.A-4 Relative percentage composition of tobacco alkanes based on gas-liquid chromatographic data (Figures rounded from those provided by Mold et al.) ............................................................................................ 3 I.A-5 Alkane isomers identified in cigarette mainstream smoke, 1968 vs. 1992 .............................................................. 3 I.A-6 Melting point and boiling point data for n-alkanes.................................................................................................. 3 I.A-7 Chronology of studies on alkanes in tobacco and tobacco smoke ........................................................................... 4 I.A-8 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from tobacco aliphatic hydrocarbons pyrolyzed in air at various temperatures ............................................................................................................................................ 5 I.A-9 Ratios for individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in gasoline engine exhaust “tar” (EET) and cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) .................................................................................................................... 6 I.A-10 Alkanes in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke .................................................................. 8–16 I.B-1 Alkenes and alkynes in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke .............................................17–33 I.C-1 Alicyclic hydrocarbons in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke......................................... 37–45 I.D-1 Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ..................... 48–54 I.E-1 Chronology of catalogs of PAHs in MSS............................................................................................................... 56 I.E-2 Benzenoid hydrocarbons discussed by Pullman and Pullman......................................................................... 62–63 I.E-3 Polycyclic hydrocarbons reported in tobacco smoke by year-end 1955 ................................................................. 63 I.E-4 Inhibition of tumorigenicity of potently tumorigenic PAHs by non-tumorigenic or weakly tumorigenic PAHs .................................................................................................................................................. 65 I.E-5 Levels of PAH classes in cigarette mainstream smoke .......................................................................................... 65 I.E-6 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke.......................67–102 I.E-7 Tobacco smoke PAHs discussed in various publications on the relationship between PAH structure and tumorigenicity......................................................................................................................................... 103-109 I.E-8 Distribution of identified hydrocarbons between tobacco and tobacco smoke .....................................................110 Chapter 2 Alcohols and Phytosterols II.A-1 Tobacco and tobacco smoke components identified by classical chemical methods ............................................112 II.A-2 Tobacco and tobacco smoke studies in which components were identified by a combination of spectral technologies ...........................................................................................................................................................113 II.A-3 Tobacco components identified post-1975 .............................................................................................................114 II.A-4 Tobacco and/or smoke alcohols used in flavor formulations.................................................................................116 II.A-5 Alcohols in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ............................................................117–204 II.B-1 Studies on identification of phytosterols and phytosteryl derivatives in tobacco and tobacco smoke ................. 207 II.B-2 Phytosterols, their derivatives, and related compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke.............................................................................................................................................208–214 Chapter 3 III-1 III-2 III-3 III-4 III-5 III-6 III-7 III-8
Aldehydes and Ketones Tobacco smoke components listed by Kosak ........................................................................................................216 Studies on low molecular weight carbonyls in tobacco and tobacco smoke: Derivatizing agents........................217 Analysis of cigarette mainstream smoke by gas chromatography ........................................................................218 Precursors in tobacco of aldehydes and ketones in tobacco................................................................................. 220 Aldehydes and ketones in mainstream smoke from all lamina and all-midrib cigarette..................................... 221 In vitro ciliary activity, cigarette smoke fractions, and dose level ....................................................................... 226 Lowest concentrations in Ringer solution leading to ciliastasis in ciliated rat trachea........................................ 226 Lung retention and mouth absorption of several cigarette mainstream smoke components ............................... 228
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 17
11/24/08 3:16:32 PM
III-9 III-10 III-11 III-12 III-13 III-14 Chapter 4 IV.A-1 IV.A-2 IV.A-3 IV.B-1 IV.B-2 IV.B-3 IV.B-4 IV.B-5 IV.B-6 IV.B-7
Difference between composition of inhaled and exhaled mainstream smoke and between mouth-held and exhaled mainstream smoke ........................................................................................................................... 228 Lung retention and mouth absorption data........................................................................................................... 229 Tobacco and/or tobacco smoke aldehydes and ketones used in flavor formulations.................................................................................................................................................. 230–231 Aldehydes in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ......................................................... 232–248 Ketones in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke..............................................................249–311 Chronology of studies on aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke............................................................. 311–315 Carboxylic Acids Acids identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke to date.........................................................................................318 Tobacco and/or tobacco smoke carboxylic acids used in flavor formulations.......................................................319 Carboxylic acids in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ............................................... 320–365 Components in pyrolysates from the amino acids lysine, leucine, and tryptophan ............................................. 366 Pyrolysis of phenylalanine. A. Effect of pyrolysis temperature. B. Effect of equimolar addition of tryptophan or pyrrole ....................................................................................................................................... 367 Components in pyrolysates from amino acids (proline and glycine) and proteins (casein and collagen) ........... 368 Amino acid-derived N-heterocyclic amines......................................................................................................... 369 Summary of lists of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke........................................................ 369 Tobacco and/or tobacco smoke amino acids used in flavor formulations ............................................................ 369 Amino acids and related compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ............... 370–379
Chapter 5 The Esters V-1 Esters used as tobacco ingredients by U.S. tobacco product manufacturers................................................ 383–385 V-2 Esters used as tobacco ingredients by tobacco product manufacturers outside of the U.S.................................. 385 V-3 Esters in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ................................................................ 386–438 Chapter 6 The Lactones VI-1 Some biological properties of lactones used as additives in foodstuffs as well as in tobacco products ............. 442 VI-2 Tobacco and/or smoke lactones used in flavor formulations ................................................................................ 443 VI-3 Lactones identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ...........................................444–460 Chapter 7 Anhydrides VII-1 Anhydrides in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke .......................................................462–463 Chapter 8 Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives VIII-1 Tobacco and/or smoke carbohydrates used in flavor formulations....................................................................... 466 VIII-2 Effect of sugars added to burley tobacco on mainstream smoke aldehyde and ketone yields ............................. 466 VIII-3 Carbohydrates in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ..................................................468–486 Chapter 9 Phenols and Quinones IX.A-1 Dibenz[a,h]acridine (I), dibenz[a,j]acridine (II), and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole (III) in nicotine pyrolysates (Pyr) and mainstream cigarette smoke condensate .............................................................................................. 488 IX.A-2 Tobacco smoke components listed by Kosak ....................................................................................................... 490 IX.A-3 Phenolic components of tobacco smoke listed by Kosak..................................................................................... 491 IX.A-4 Studies of phenolic components of tobacco smoke omitted from the 1954 listing by Kosak.............................. 491 IX.A-5 Tobacco smoke phenols catalogued by Johnstone and Plimmer.......................................................................... 493 IX.A-6 Publications/presentations (1952–1964) pertinent to identification of phenolic components of tobacco smoke.............................................................................................................................. 493 IX.A-7 Tobacco smoke phenols catalogued by Stedman (3797) ...................................................................................... 494 IX.A-8 Presentations at Tobacco Chemists’ Research (TCRC) and Tobacco Science Research Conferences (TSRC) on phenolic components of tobacco products ......................................................................................... 495 IX.A-9 Reports of research pertinent to phenolic compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke 1964 to 2005 .................................................................................................................................................496–497 IX.A-10 Variation in bioassay results with phenols or phenol-containing materials ......................................................... 498 IX.A-11 Inhibitors and anticarcinogens in tobacco smoke ................................................................................................ 500 IX.A-12 Tobacco smoke phenols with anticarcinogenic or antipromoting properties ....................................................... 501
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 18
11/24/08 3:16:32 PM
IX.A-13 IX.A-14 IX.A-15 IX.A-16 IX.A-17 IX.A-18 IX.A-19 IX.A-20 IX.A-21 IX.A-22 IX.B-1 IX.B-2 IX.B-3
Precursors in tobacco of phenols in tobacco smoke............................................................................................. 503 Pyrolysis of tobacco, tobacco components, and spinach: Phenol content of pyrolysate ...................................... 504 Pyrolysis of tobacco components: Generation of phenols.................................................................................... 505 Smoke chemistry data: NCI study of cocoa addition ........................................................................................... 506 Studies on the selective filtration of phenolic compounds in cigarette mainstream smoke................................. 508 Effect of tobacco expansion on levels of mainstream smoke phenols.................................................................. 509 Studies involving nitrate addition to tobacco ................................................................................................ 511–512 Effect of cut width on mainstream smoke properties............................................................................................513 Theoretical relationship between phenols in tobacco and several phenols in tobacco smoke ..............................514 Phenols in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ............................................................. 515–546 Comparison of the tumorigenicities of aromatic hydrocarbons, their diols (phenols), and their diones (quinones)................................................................................................................................... 547 Quinones identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ...........................................549–551 Chronology of identification of quinones in tobacco and/or smoke…..........................................................552–553
Chapter 10 The Ethers X-1 Tobacco and/or smoke ethers used in flavor formulations ................................................................................... 556 X-2 Ethers in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke.................................................................557–614 X-3 Distribution of identified oxygen-containing components between tobacco and tobacco smoke.........................614 Chapter 11 Nitriles XI-1 Nitriles identified and/or discussed in tobacco smoke by the mid-1960s..............................................................616 XI-2 Nitriles in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke...............................................................617–625 Chapter 12 Acyclic Amines XII-1 IARC evaluation of carcinogenicity of various aromatic amines in tobacco smoke (1870) ................................ 628 XII-2 Amines identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ............................................. 630–661 Chapter 13 Amides XIII-1 Amides identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ............................................. 665–677 Chapter 14 Imides XIV-1 Imides identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke...............................................680–685 Chapter 15 XV-1 XV-2 XV-3 XV-4 XV-5 XV-6 XV-7 XV-8
N-Nitrosamines Major N-nitrosamines in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke ..................................................................................... 690 Summary of lists of tumorigenic N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke............................................... 692 A brief chronology of the research on volatile N-nitrosamines from 1937 to 1990..................................... 693–698 A brief chronology of the research on tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines ..................................................... 700–704 N-Nitrosamines in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke............................................................................................... 708 Aliphatic secondary amines and volatile N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke .................................. 709 Aromatic and cyclic secondary amines and N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke.......................710–711 N-Nitrosamines in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke .................................................713–720
Chapter 16 Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols XVI-1 Nitroalkanes, nitroarenes, and nitrophenols in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............................................................................................................................................................ 722–725 Chapter 17 XVII.A-1 XVII.A-2 XVII.A-3 XVII.A-4
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components 4-Membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............ 728 Studies on the pyrolysis of amino acids ............................................................................................................... 730 Distribution of 5-membered N-containing ring compounds between tobacco and tobacco smoke..................... 732 5-Membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke.............................................................................................................................................................733–746
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 19
11/24/08 3:16:32 PM
XVII.A-5 XVII.B-1 XVII.B-2 XVII.B-3 XVII.B-4 XVII.B-5 XVII.B-6 XVII.B-7 XVII.C-1 XVII.D-1 XVII.D-2 XVII.E-1 XVII.E-2 XVII.E-3 XVII.E-4 XVII.E-5 XVII.E-6 XVII.E-7 XVII.E-8 XVII.F-1 XVII.F-2 XVII.F-3 XVII.F-4 XVII.F-5 XVII.F-6 XVII.E-7 XVII.E-8
Compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke with multiple 5-membered N-containing rings.........................................................................................................................................746–747 Distribution of 6-membered N-containing ring compounds between tobacco and tobacco smoke…..................751 Compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke with a 6-membered N-containing ring ..........................................................................................................................................755–779 Distribution of components with a 6-membered N-containing ring and a second 5-membered N-containing ring between tobacco and tobacco smoke........................................... 780 Compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke with a 6-and a 5-membered N-containing ring ..........................................................................................................................................781–789 Distribution of components with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings between tobacco and tobacco smoke .................................................................................................................................. 791 Compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings .................................................................................................................. 792–797 Tobacco and tobacco smoke compounds with 6-membered rings, with a 5- and a 6-membered ring, or with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings ................................................................................ 797 Lactams in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke… .........................................................799-804 The distribution of oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke............ 806 Oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............................................................................................................................................................ 807–809 Dibenz[a,h]acridine {I}, dibenz[a,j]acridine {II}, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III} in nicotine pyrolysates (Pyr) and mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC)...............................................811 Chronology of selected aza-arenes: Dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, quinoline ............................................................................................................813–817 Summary of lists of tumorigenic aza-arenes in tobacco smoke............................................................................818 Tobacco smoke components related to aza-arenes in tumorigen lists...................................................................819 Aza-arene sources other than tobacco smoke… ...................................................................................................819 Aza-arenes and other polycyclic nitrogen compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ....................................................................................................................... 820–833 Structures of aza-arenes in tobacco and tobacco smoke… .................................................................................. 834 Derivatives of fused N-containing-ring compounds with two or more nitrogens in the rings..................... 835–840 Mutagenic activities of N-heterocyclic amines towards Salmonella typhimurium….......................................... 840 Summary of lists of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke........................................................ 844 N-Heterocyclic amines: Mutagenicity of beverages, heated foods, and heated food components...............845–846 Mutagenicity of common beverages vs. cigarette smoke condensate .................................................................. 846 Benzo[a]pyrene equivalency of extracts of charred fish and meat....................................................................... 847 Components related to N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke: Identification and biological properties .............................................................................................................................. 847–848 Chronology of N-heterocyclic amine studies…………………………………………………….….. .............. 849–851 N-Heterocyclic amines in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke……………….….......... 852–853
Chapter 18 Miscellaneous Components XVIII.A-1 Sulfur-containing components in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............................................................................................................................................................ 858–872 XVIII.B-1 Halogenated components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke… ................................................................ 876 XVIII.B-2 The distribution of halogenated components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke ...................................... 876 XVIII.B-3 Halogenated and related components in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............................................................................................................................................................ 877–892 Chapter 19 XIX-1 XIX-2 XIX-3 XIX-4 XIX-5
Fixed and Variable Gases Volume percentages of fixed gases in the Earth’s atmosphere............................................................................. 894 Volume percentages of some variable gases (inorganic and organic) in the atmosphere. ................................... 894 Fixed gases in the vapor phase of MSS…............................................................................................................ 895 Major fixed and variable gases in non-filtered whole tobacco smoke… .............................................................. 895 Fixed and variable gases in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke .................................. 898–905
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 20
11/24/08 3:16:32 PM
Chapter 20. Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts XX-1 Elemental composition of a typical plant ............................................................................................................. 908 XX-2 Percent transfer of selected metallic and nonmetallic elements between tobacco and tobacco smoke ............... 913 XX-3 IARC classification and references to agents, groups of agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances evaluated by IARC that are metals, metallic compounds, radioisotopes, or tobacco or tobacco smoke-related materials .....................................................................................................914 XX-4 Distribution of metallic and nonmetallic elements, isotopes and ions between tobacco and tobacco smoke ......917 XX-5 Metallic and nonmetallic elements and ions in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............................................................................................................................................................ 918–926 XX-6 Various ionic and covalently bonded organic and inorganic compounds containing metals and nonmetals, miscellaneous ions, and organometallic compounds found in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke............................................................................................................................................ 927–932 Chapter 21 XXI-1 XXI-2 XXI-3
Pesticides and Growth Regulators Percent transfer of intact agrochemicals to mainstream smoke........................................................................... 938 Degradation products of pesticides in mainstream smoke................................................................................... 939 Synthetic and natural pesticides and plant growth regulators in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ....................................................................................................................... 940–976
Chapter 22 Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes XXII-1 Relative size of genomes and number of genes by species .................................................................................. 980 XXII-2 Enzymes, genes, clones in tobacco............................................................................................................... 983–999 Chapter 23 “Hoffmann Analytes” XXIII-1 Hoffmann contributions on smoke components to the 1985 IARC Working Group on Tobacco Smoking ............................................................................................................................... 1002 XXIII-2 Hoffmann-related lists of toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke................................................................... 1002 XXIII-3 The basis for the “Hoffmann Analytes”: The lists of toxicants issued by Hoffmann et al. from 1986 to 2001.......................................................................................................... 1003–1007 XXIII-4 An abbreviated chronology of the use of the term “Hoffmann Analyte” or its equivalent in tobacco smoke-related scientific literature .............................................................................................................1009–1011 XXIII-5 “Hoffmann analytes” in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ....................................1012–1048 XXIII-6 Reported yields of “Hoffmann Analytes” in 1R4F and 2R4F mainstream smoke; proposed MSS “Hoffmann Analyte” yield analyses.....................................................................1049–1051 Chapter 24 Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients XXIV-1A As listed by Doull et al. individual ingredient components used in U.S. smoking products.. ...................................................................................................................................................1056–1059 XXIV-1B As listed by Baker et al. individual ingredient components not used in U.S. smoking products but used outside of the U.S .................................................................................................................. 1059 XXIV-2 Tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components used as tobacco ingredients… ............................................1060–1101 XXIV-3 A summary of tobacco ingredient studies conducted from 1997 to date.................................................. 1103–1105 Chapter 25 XXV-1 XXV-2 XXV-3
XXV-4 XXV-5 XXV-6 XXV-7 XXV-8
Pyrolysis Precursor relationships between tobacco leaf components and tobacco smoke components ................... 1108–1110 Pyrolysis studies on n-hexane extract from tobacco ..........................................................................................1113 Comparison of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon fraction levels, phenol yields, and acid yields in 700°C pyrolysates from tobacco, petroleum ether extractables (PEE), and the tobacco residue (RES) after extraction.....................................................................................................................................................1115 Dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in nicotine pyrolysates (Pyr) and mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) ...........................................................................................1118 Organic solvent-soluble components of tobacco identified post-1955.................................................................1119 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons pyrolyzed in air at various temperatures ....................................................................................................................................................... 1120 Total, free, and bound sterols in cigarette tobacco..............................................................................................1121 Component distribution in eight subfractions from a petroleum ether extract of tobacco (8% of tobacco weight) .......................................................................................................................................1123
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 21
11/24/08 3:16:33 PM
XXV-9 XXV-10 XXV-11 XXV-12 XXV-13 XXV-14 XXV-15 XXV-16 XXV-17 XXV-18 XXV-19 XXV-20 XXV-21 XXV-22 XXV-23 XXV-24 XXV-25 XXV-26 XXV-27 XXV-28 XXV-29 XXV-30 XXV-31 XXV-32
Conversion of tobacco leaf constituents to total mainstream smoke polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. ..........1123 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from tobacco components pyrolyzed in a N2 atmosphere at 650°C.............1125 Conversion of components in tobacco to benzo[a]pyrene during pyrolysis........................................................1126 Conversion of pectins, starch, and cellulose to specific polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phenols during smoking ......................................................................................................................................1127 Pyrolysis vs. actual smoking conditions: Conversion of glucose, fructose, and cellulose to benzo[a]pyrene ...1129 Pyrolysis of leaf acids: Generation of selected phenols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ........................1130 Conversion of trimyristin added to tobacco to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during actual cigarette smoking ...............................................................................................................................................1131 Components in pyrolysates from lysine, leucine, and tryptophan ......................................................................1132 Pyrolysis of phenylalanine. A. Effect of pyrolysis temperature B. Effect of equimolar addition of tryptophan (Try) or pyrrole (Pyr) .......................................................................................................................1133 Components in pyrolysates from amino acids (proline and glycine) and proteins (casein and collagen) ..........1134 Amino acid-derived N-heterocylic amines…......................................................................................................1135 Summary of lists of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic amines identified in tobacco smoke.......................................1135 Precursor relationships between N-containing tobacco leaf components and tobacco smoke components.......1136 NCI study (second set of experimental cigarettes): Effect of long chained alcohols sucker growth inhibitors on cigarette smoke properties..............................................................................................................................1137 NCI study (fourth set of experimental cigarettes): Effect of pesticides addition on cigarette smoke properties...................................................................................................................................1138 Pyrolysis of licorice vs. flue-cured tobacco: Benzo[a]pyrene generation….......................................................1139 NCI study (third set of experimental cigarettes): Effect of a humectant (glycerol) or casing material (sugar or cocoa) on cigarette smoke properties.....................................................................................1140 Benzo[a]pyrene in the pyrolysates from various humectants used or proposed for use in cigarette fabrication............................................................................................................................................................1140 Benzo[a]pyrene in the pyrolysates from various materials used or proposed for use in cigarette fabrication ............................................................................................................................................1142 Pyrolysis of cellulose and starch: Comparison of benzo[a]pyrene data from Kröller with those from Gilbert and Lindsey ....................................................................................................................................1142 Pyrolysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke components plus their effect on smoke composition when added to tobacco .............................................................................................................................. 1144–1165 Pyrolysis of non-tobacco and non-tobacco smoke components and/or their effect on smoke composition when added to tobacco...........................................................................................................1166-1168 Pyrolysis of miscellaneous tobacco product components plus their effect on smoke composition when added to tobacco ........................................................................................................................................1169 Summary of tobacco ingredient studies from 1994–2005… .................................................................... 1169–1171
Chapter 26 Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens XXVI-1 Tumorigens, carcinogens, and toxicants listed by Hoffmann and colleagues............................................1174–1178 XXVI-2 The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon paradoxes ...................................................................................... 1184–1187 XXVI-3 Dibenz[a,h]acridine {I}, dibenz[a,j]acridine {II}, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III} in nicotine pyrolysates (Pyr) and mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) ...............................................................1188 XXVI-4 N-Nitrosamines in tobacco smoke............................................................................................................. 1190–1193 XXVI-5 Summary of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke...................................................................1193 XXVI-6 Chronology of N-heterocyclic amine studies ........................................................................................... 1194–1196 XXVI-7A Anticarcinogens, inhibitors, and antimutagens in tobacco and tobacco smoke........................................1199–1201 XXVI-7B Anticarcinogens, inhibitors, and antimutagens in tobacco and tobacco smoke........................................ 1202-1204 XXVI-7C Anticarcinogens, antitumorigens, inhibitors, and antimutagens in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ....................................................................................................................1205–1218 XXVI-8 Exposures to tumorigens and mutagens from sources other than mainstream and environmental tobacco smoke .............................................................................................................................1219 XXVI-9 Personal exposure to tobacco smoke polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons listed as tumorigens… .............................................................................................................................................1220–1221
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 22
11/24/08 3:16:33 PM
XXVI-10 XXVI-11 XXVI-12 XXVI-13 XXVI-14 XXVI-15 XXVI-16 XXVI-17 XXVI-18 XXVI-19 XXVI-20 XXVI-21 XXVI-22
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon sources… ...................................................................................................... 1222 Levels of benzo[a]pyrene and benz[a]anthracene in common foodstuffs…...................................................... 1223 Cigarette equivalents of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) in common foodstuffs ........ 1224 Comparison of daily dietary and inhalation intake of benzo[a]pyrene ............................................................. 1224 Aza-arenes sources other than tobacco smoke................................................................................................... 1225 N-Nitrosamines in foods and beverages (ng/g) ................................................................................................. 1226 Volatile and nonvolatile N-nitrosamines in foodstuffs and beverages .....................................................1227–1228 Comparison of dietary and environmental tobacco smoke................................................................................ 1229 Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in indoor air .................................................................................................. 1229 Non-tobacco exposures to tobacco/tobacco smoke N-nitrosamines .................................................................. 1230 Mutagenicity of beverages, heated foods, and heated food components ..................................................1232–1233 Mutagenicity of common beverages vs. cigarette smoke condensate ................................................................ 1233 Benzo[a]pyrene equivalency of extracts of charred fish and meat..................................................................... 1233
Chapter 27 Free Radicals XXVII-1 Free radicals in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke .................................................1253–1254 Chapter 28 Summary XXVIII-1 Distribution of chemical components between tobacco and tobacco smoke ............................................1258–1259
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 23
11/24/08 3:16:33 PM
List of Figures I.B-1
Phytadienes with potential to yield Diels-Alder adducts and subsequently alkylanthraquinones and anthraquinonecarboxylic acids ........................................................................................................................ 35 I.B-2 Phytadienes with little or no potential to form Diels-Alder adducts...................................................................... 35 I.C-1 Possible sterol degradation products ...................................................................................................................... 46 I.C-2 Phytadiene dimers .................................................................................................................................................. 47 I.E-1 The L region, K region, and bay region of benz[a]anthracene............................................................................... 60 II.A-1 The degradation products from ozonized solanesol..............................................................................................112 II.A-2 Tobacco and/or tobacco smoke alcohols related to cembrene...............................................................................115 II.B-1 Theoretical conversion of cholesterol to 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[ j]aceanthrylene ......................................... 205 II.B-2 Possible sterol degradation products .................................................................................................................... 205 III-1 Approximate composition of cigarette mainstream smoke...................................................................................218 III-2 Cigarette mainstream smoke components: Logarithmic plot................................................................................219 III-3 Phenolic alcohol components of lignin ................................................................................................................ 221 VI-1 Relationships between coumarin, its derivatives, and dicumarol ........................................................................ 440 IX.A-1 A substituted phenol ............................................................................................................................................. 491 IX.A-2 Potential precursors in tobacco of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke................................................ 505 X-1 Cembranoid ethers identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke .......................................................................... 556 XII-1 Oxygenated N-containing components of tobacco and tobacco smoke…………………… ................................. 628 XII-2 Structural similarities of alkylamines and pyrrolidines ...................................................................................... 628 XIV-1A The amide, imide, and lactam configurations ...................................................................................................... 679 XIV-1B The amide {II}, imide {III}, and lactam {IV} configurations in 1-acetyl-3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro4-methyl-2H-pyrrol-2-one {I} .............................................................................................................................. 679 XV-1 N-Nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) and N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR)........................................................... 699 XV-2 Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines ......................................................................................................................... 700 XV-3 References pertinent to tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines, 1983–2004 ................................................................ 704 XV-4 Relationships among amino acids, N-nitrosamino acids, their esters, and N-nitrosamines ................................ 706 XV-5 Indole {XLII}, carbazole {XLIII}, and 1H-benzimidazole {XLIV} ................................................................... 712 XVII.A-1 Representative structures of the 4- and 5-membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke ..................................................................................................... 728 XVII.A-2 Porphyrin .............................................................................................................................................................. 732 XVII.B-1 Proposed biosynthetic pathways for production of several pyridine alkaloids .................................................... 749 XVII.B-2 Structures of the 6-membered N-containing compounds found in tobacco and tobacco smoke......................... 752 XVII.B-3 Common tobacco alkaloids found in tobacco and tobacco smoke....................................................................... 789 XVII.B-4 Common tobacco alkaloids found in tobacco and tobacco smoke with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings .......................................................................................................................... 791 XVII.C-1A The imide and lactam configurations…………………………................................................................................... 798 XVII.C-1B The imide {II} and lactam {III} configurations in 1,7-dihydro-6H-purine-2,6-dione (xanthine) {I}.................. 798 XVII.D-1 Parent structures of the oxazoles and oxazines identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke................................... 805 XVII.E-1 Quinoline and naphthalene....................................................................................................................................810 XVII.E-2 Some polycyclic components of tobacco smoke ...................................................................................................810 XVII.E-3 Some amino acid-derived N-heterocyclics identified in tobacco smoke.............................................................. 812 XVII.F-1 Pyrocoll, norharman, and harman….................................................................................................................... 834 XVII.F-2 N-Heterocyclic amines, the “cooked food” mutagens.......................................................................................... 834 XVII.F-3 Theoretical conversion of glutamic acid {XII} to aminobutanoic acids {XIII, XIV} and aminopyridines {XV-XVII} .......................................................................................................................... 841 XVII.F-4 Theoretical routes for conversion of glutamic acid-derived aminopyridines to possible tobacco smoke components................................................................................................................................................ 842
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 25
11/24/08 3:16:33 PM
XVII.F-5 XXV-1 XXV-2 XXVI-1 XXVI-2 XXVII-1
Possible tryptophan-derived compounds in tobacco smoke................................................................................. 843 Possible sterol degradation products ...................................................................................................................1122 The picene configuration present in glycyrrhizic acid ........................................................................................1139 “Tar” and nicotine deliveries, sales weighted average basis ...............................................................................1181 Structural similarity of several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and aza-arenes............................................1183 Chemical structures of 4-POBN, PBN, MNP, PNO, 4-methyl-PNO, and DMPO spin-traps [From McCormick et al.] ................................................................................................................................... 1237
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 26
11/24/08 3:16:33 PM
Introduction History balances the frustration of how far we have to go with the satisfaction of how far we have come. It teaches us tolerance for the human shortcomings and imperfections which are not uniquely of our generation, but of all time. —Lewis F. Powell, Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States (1972–1987)
THE INTENT OF THE WORK Years from now, just as we were surprised how paltry was the number of identified tobacco smoke components cataloged in 1954 by Kosak (2170), others will no doubt have similar remarks concerning this catalog. We hope the reader will be satisfied rather than frustrated with the progress that has been made by tobacco scientists over the last fifty plus years in furthering our knowledge base of components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. It should be noted the last published detailed catalog of tobacco and tobacco smoke components was that of Stedman (3797) in 1968.
THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF TOBACCO The Master Catalog, collected over a fifty-year period, is our tabulation of all the information on the components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The Master Catalog contains all of the information on components in tobacco and tobacco smoke that is contained in each chapter of this book as well as the information in the Bibliography and Alphabetical Component Index sections of the book. During the creation of the book, the information contained in the Master Catalog was searched to extract all of the components by functional group (alcohols, esters, aldehydes, etc.) to be includes in the separate tables for each chapter of the book. The Bibliography was separated from the Master Catalog as a separate section of the book. An Alphabetical Component Index was then created as a ready resource for readers to access particular information on each component and to locate the chapters and tables in the book chapters where that class of components is discussed. The original Master Catalog that we developed as such is not part of this book but was subdivided into numerous tables of components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke by chemical functionality, the Bibliography, and the Alphabetical Component Index. Tobacco is a fascinating organism. This plant, as all plants do, takes the simplest of molecules (carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water), light, and a series of metals (as micronutrients) and through a sophisticated internal process converts these materials to complex molecules for plant growth, regulation, and maintenance. Tobacco has been called a chemical factory. It has been cultivated for the purpose of collecting nicotine for
use as an insecticide and for starting material for numerous commercial chemicals such as the pyridines. More recently, it has been studied as a source of plant protein [Fraction 1 (F-1) and Fraction 2 (F-2) protein] (3974c). There are many different botanical classifications for tobacco plants. The genus Nicotiana has over sixty known species; each has been examined as to its genetic, physiological, botanical, and chemical characteristics (3972, 3973). Two tobacco species are grown commercially: Nicotiana rustica, primarily for nicotine and solanesol collection; and Nicotiana tabacum, for use as cigarette, pipe, cigar, snuff, and chewing tobaccos. To date, approximately 4200 components have been identified in tobacco. This number does not include the nontobacco components listed as added flavorants by Doull (1053) and Baker and Bishop (172a) or the hundreds of enzyme and other proteinaceous components listed in our Master Catalog. This is a tremendous achievement compared to the number of tobacco components reported as 3044 in 1988 by Roberts (3215), reported as 2549 tobacco compounds in 1982 by Dube and Green (1067), the 200 identified compounds reported in 1960 (2338), the 199 organic compounds and 21 inorganic elements reported as identified in tobacco in 1959 (1971), and the accounting of less than 10 tobacco constituents by Frankenburg (1221) in 1946. It should be noted that in the classification by Frankenburg, the tobacco constituents listed were not individual compounds but classes of compounds such as alkaloids, proteins (soluble and insoluble fractions), nitrate-nitrogen, amino nitrogen, etc. It is estimated that literally tens of thousands of unidentified compounds are yet to be discovered in tobacco. This estimate is based on the assumptions that there have already been thousands of organic, inorganic, and organometallic compounds identified in tobacco, that each plant contains hundreds of extremely complex compounds, for example, various types of DNA and RNA, numerous types of complex enzymes, proteins, sugar and amino acid oligomers, needed for plant growth, regulation, and maintenance, and that numerous fragments of these complex molecules have already been reported in tobacco. If it were not for scientists’ curiosity and the tremendous advances in analytical chemistry over the last fifty to sixty years, the need for this up-to-date catalog of compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke would not be critical. Over the last fifty to sixty years literally tens of thousands of scientific articles on varied topics in tobacco and tobacco smoke science have been written. Our understanding of these two areas of science has advanced tremendously in the recent past. As noted by Knipling [see the Preface in Tso (3974c)]: Pioneering tobacco research was the foundation of plant science at the dawn of modern development, in such areas as light, nutrition, genetics, growth control, disorders and metabolism. Tobacco research led to current advancements
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 27
11/24/08 3:16:33 PM
in plant biotechnology. In addition, tobacco plant research contributed significantly to public health research in radioactive elements, mycotoxins, and air pollutants. However, public support for tobacco research has today greatly declined to almost total elimination because of a sense of political correctness … tobacco is one of the most valuable research tools, and is a most abundant source of scientific information. Research with tobacco plants will contribute far beyond the frontiers of agricultural science: tobacco can be a source of food supply with nutrition value similar to that of milk; tobacco can be a source of health supplies including medical chemicals and various vaccines; tobacco can be a source of biofuel. All we need is to treat tobacco with respect; the use of tobacco is only in its initial stages.
For nearly fifty years, our Master Catalog of components identified in tobacco and smoke has been in the process of assembly. Each component has one or more corresponding references. The tobacco literature was diligently searched for components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. As new components in tobacco and tobacco smoke were reported by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. R&D personnel and in the published scientific literature, they were entered into the Master Catalog. Data on components in mainstream smoke (MSS), sidestream smoke (SSS), and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) were collected from studies on the smokes from a variety of tobacco types and blends and numerous forms of smoking articles, such as cigarettes, cigars, and cigarillos. Data on tobacco components were collected from studies on numerous species of Nicotiana (primarily Nicotiana tabacum). The tobacco component data were collected from studies not only on all stages of plant development (seed to harvested plant) but also from tobacco processed in various ways (aged, fermented [to various degrees], steamed, cut, rolled, expanded, converted to reconstituted sheet [by various methods], treated with additives) prior to use as a smoking material. The Master Catalog contains an enormous variety of species from nearly every class of chemical components. We have separated and combined the identified components in tobacco and tobacco smoke into classes of components, for example, hydrocarbons, alcohols, acids, esters, aza-arenes, and each class will be discussed in a separate chapter. For the reader’s information, tobacco and tobacco smoke components possessing multifunctional groups will appear in each of the appropriate chapter lists but will be only tallied once as a tobacco component and/or a tobacco smoke component. For example, 2-furancarboxylic acid (2-furoic acid) is listed in the chapter on carboxylic acids and the chapter on ethers; 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (vanillin) is listed in each of the chapters on aldehydes, ethers, and phenols. The Master Catalog and the chapters on the various classes of tobacco components do contain some items not identified as tobacco components per se. They include items that (1) are not identified components of untreated tobacco and/or its smoke but are individual compounds added to the tobacco in a flavor formulation to improve consumer acceptability
of commercial products;* (2) are the pesticides, herbicides, nematicides, growth control agents, etc. (or their residues) that improve the agronomic situation for tobacco cultivation or have been found on tobacco; (3) are mycotoxic products of microorganisms found on tobacco plants, for example, aflatoxins; and (4) thermal degradation products from (1), (2), and (3) found in tobacco smoke. Many of the components in (1) were identified as added tobacco ingredients in the reports by Doull et al. (1053), Baker and Bishop (172a), and Baker et al. (174b). Many of the components in (2) are retained in the tobacco after harvesting and curing, are transferred intact to the smoke, and in some cases are degraded to compounds not usually expected in tobacco smoke. As noted previously, the items in (1) and (3) were not included in the 4200 identified tobacco components discussed earlier. Also not included in our Master Catalog are the additives comprising mixtures from naturally occurring products, for example, alfalfa extract, basil oil, honey. These will be discussed in the chapter on tobacco additives. During the 1920s and 1930s, plant nutrition was an active area of research and tobacco served as the model in much of that work. The results of research on nitrogen assimilation, light as a factor in nitrogen fixation, and how weather contributed to nutrient uptake contributed greatly to our understanding of plant science. All these advancements seem trivial today in light of the sophisticated work in genomics, but were nonetheless initially due to the pioneering work of scientists working with tobacco (3972, 3973). The presence of some micro-elements in tobacco was reported as early as 1921. Today, nearly all of the common elements, including alkali, alkali earth, heavy metal, and rare elements, have been reported to be present in tobacco, for example, Al, As, Ba, B, Cs, Cr, Co, Cu, F, Au, I, Pb, Li, Mg, Mn, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pt, Po, Ra, Rb, Se, Si, Ag, Sr, S, Ta, Ti, Sn, U, V, and Zn. Many heavy metal radioactive components have been reported in tobacco, including those from the uranium series, for example, 234U, 226Ra, 228Ra, 222Rn, 210Po, and others, such as 38Cl, 46Sc, 134Ce, 59Fe, and 40K. The presence of such elements in tobacco may be accidental, acquired from soil or from other sources. Scientists curious to understand the role of these assorted elements conducted research studies from the 1920s in order to understand the role of each element in plant growth and development. The effect of boron on plant growth was first noted in 1929, zinc in 1942, and copper in 1942. The concept of metals as catalysts in plant growth advanced the areas of chemical catalysis and its use in industrial fermentation (3972, 3973). The transfer of elements, particularly some of the metallic ones noted above, from tobacco to its smoke has been studied since the mid1950s, for example, see Cogbill and Hobbs (769). *
Among the flavor formulation compounds listed as tobacco ingredients by Baker and Bishop (172a), Baker et al. (174b), and Doull et al. (1053) was a substantial number of compounds reported as identified components of additive-free tobacco and/or its smoke [see Tables 1, 5, and 7A in (3266)]. That number was increased recently because of the identification of several additional listed flavor formulation compounds in flue-cured tobacco by Peng et al. (2917a) and in Perique tobacco by Leffingwell and Alford (2339a).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 28
11/24/08 3:16:34 PM
Elemental isotopes have also been used in tobacco research for over fifty years. Studies with single, double, and even triple labeled compounds incorporating 15N, 3H, and 14C were reported by personnel at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in the early 1950s in their studies on plant metabolism (3972, 3973). Tobacco is a very labor-intensive and sensitive crop. Hundreds of agronomic and physical processing steps occur from seed planting to final use in commercial products. The type of tobacco (flue-cured, burley, Maryland, Oriental, as well as dark air-cured tobacco and various cigar tobaccos) and how the tobacco is produced and cured affect the type and level of chemical compounds in tobacco leaf and in smoke. Among the chemicals applied to tobacco are insecticides, acaricides, miticides, nematicides, and growth control agents, for example, sucker-control and yellowing agents. These were developed to control pests and plant growth, to reduce labor, and ultimately produce a better, healthier, and more profitable crop. Their number and types are large. Over the years, new chemical agents were developed and commercialized as others were either banned or found to be less effective. Nonetheless, some pesticide residues remain in the soil and are often transported to the plant. All the commercial pesticides (as well as herbicides) are tested thoroughly and can be safely used (822a). As an example, today the most widely used sucker-control agents are fatty compounds, including fatty acids, alcohols, esters, and some of their derivatives. These sucker-control agents significantly inhibit axillary growth without causing undesirable side effects to the plant or the public (3972, 3973). The genetic makeup of tobacco includes 25000 to 50000 genes. Gene mapping of tobacco is being conducted in the Plant Pathology Department, North Carolina State University Centennial Campus, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, in a project known as the Tobacco Genome Initiative (TGI). Its goal is to sequence and catalog more than 90% of the genome of cultivated tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum. Although tobacco has been cultivated for more than 500 years and is a crop of great economic significance, relatively little information exists on its genome structure and organization. A complete tobacco gene catalog will provide information needed to investigate the physiological and genetic processes in the plant kingdom, in general, and in Nicotiana tabacum specifically. Understanding the genetic processes occurring within the tobacco plant could potentially provide valuable information on ways to reduce the harm associated with cigarette smoking and also provide information on agronomic traits associated with disease and pest resistance genes for use in improving traditional and molecular breeding projects aimed at enhancing the performance of tobacco as a crop. The plants within the agriculturally important Solanaceae family, which includes tobacco, tomato, potato, eggplant, and pepper crop plants, will all benefit from gene discovery in Nicotiana tabacum. Available for public use are additional databases that contain listings of enzymes, enzymatic pathways, and reaction
products of metabolic and catabolic processes occurring in tobacco species. Many of these are listed as references in our chapter catalogs: r GenBank (tobacco): For references see, http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html (1282a). r BRENDA: The Comprehensive Enzyme Information System, Entry of hydroxymethylglutarylCoA reductase (NADPH) (EC-Number 1.1.1.34) Nicotiana, KEGG Link 00100 Steroid Biosynthesis, see: http://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/show_ pathway?map00100+1.1.1.34 (429c). r BRENDA: The Comprehensive Enzyme Information System; http://www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/ show_pathway?map00500+2.4.1.35 (429b). r Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG); see Kanehisa, M. and S. Goto: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 27–30 (429b). r Lyon, G.D.: Host pathogen interactions and crop protection; Metabolic pathways of the diseased potato at: http://www.scri.sari.ac.uk/publications/ annualreports/98Indiv/21Metabo.pdf (429b). Plant scientists have long known that all organic components are dynamic in nature and change in numerous ways when present in biological systems. Chemical, catalytic, enzymatic, and bacteriological processes occur continuously during plant growth in the field and until these biological processes are quenched at harvest and during processing. Tobacco scientists have extensively studied the metabolism and catabolism occurring in Nicotiana plants because the change or formation of each compound may affect its final quality and thus its usability. Organic compounds are formed, transformed, and interact during plant growth in the field, during post harvest handling processes of curing, aging, and fermentation, and during manufacturing, including interaction with additives, and during blending (3972, 3973). The chemical composition of tobacco determines the chemical composition and yield of components in its tobacco smoke. For example, leaf protein (F-1 and F-2 protein) is abundant in tobacco and turns over and decomposes continuously to produce a vast array of protein subunits, amino acids, and amino acid oligomers (3974c). Tobacco leaf protein by itself contributes little to smoking quality, but it is a major precursor of hundreds of tobacco smoke components, for example, numerous nitrogenous compounds, amino acids. Similarly, other major tobacco components, such as the carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, pigments, polyphenols, fatty compounds, phytosterols, and many primary or secondary compounds play a significant role in producing a myriad of tobacco smoke compounds (3972, 3973). Tobacco has been used in one form or another in civilized society for nearly five centuries. Eventually in the late nineteenth century investigations as to its composition began but they were not particularly numerous. The major driving force in the escalation in the mid-twentieth century of studies on
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 29
11/24/08 3:16:34 PM
tobacco composition was the attempt to define (1) its components that contributed to the consumer acceptability of the taste and aroma of tobacco itself and its smoke and (2) the precursors in tobacco of the toxicants in its smoke. The latter investigations were triggered by the following events: (1) The publications from 1950 to 1953 of the results from several retrospective studies on lung cancer in smokers and nonsmokers [Doll and Hill (1027), Mills and Porter (2556), McConnell et al. (2515), Sadowsky et al. (3375a), Schrek et al. (3529), Wynder and Graham (4306b)]. The results suggested an association between cigarette smoking and cancer of the lung, particularly the lung cancer tumor type defined as squamous cell carcinoma. (2) The 1953 presentation and publication by Wynder et al. (4306a) of their findings on the production of malignant tumors in a susceptible strain of mice skin painted daily with massive doses of solutions of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) supposedly generated under conditions simulating the human smoking of a cigarette. These statistical and biological findings augmented by the results of additional similar studies led to an escalation in the research to define the composition of cigarette smoke and to determine which of its components were responsible for the observed biological response. When a particular class of components — the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) — was considered responsible, studies escalated to define the precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in its smoke. Previous detailed reports on the composition of tobacco included those issued by Brückner in 1936 (451), Latimer in 1955 (2270), Johnstone and Plimmer in 1959 (1971), Shmuk in 1961 (3657), Stedman in 1968 (3797), Roberts et al. in 1975 (3224), Schmeltz and Hoffmann on nitrogen-containing tobacco components in 1977 (3491), Enzell and colleagues on terpenoid-derived tobacco components between 1976 and the late 1980s (1149, 1150, 1156, 4089, 4090). One thing has become apparent since the mid-1950s: No other consumer product that involves a complex mixture has been defined in such detail as tobacco and/or its smoke, for example, the number of components identified to date in tobacco is almost twice that of the number identified in coffee.
IDENTIFIED COMPONENTS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO SMOKE IN THE MASTER CATALOG Many of the components identified in tobacco have also been identified in its smoke because they transfer in part from tobacco to its smoke during the smoking process. Many other identified tobacco components are not found in smoke because they decompose during the smoking process. The level of many tobacco components considered to contribute to the acceptable taste of its smoke are augmented by inclusion in various additive formulations used in the U.S. Tobacco Industry (1053, 3263). Figure 0.1 illustrates the increase in number of identified components in tobacco and its smoke. Green and Rodgman (1373) discussed the contribution of improved analytical technologies to the periodic escalation in the number of identified components in each.
6000 5000 E 4000 3000 D
2000 1000 0
Tobacco Smoke
C B
A 50
55
60
65
70
75
80 Year
85
90
95
00
05
FIGURE 0.1 Number of identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components reported since 1954: Accumulative by year: A = prior to 1953: “classical” chemical techniques; B = 1953–1960: column chromatography; C = 1960–1970: gas chromatography; D = 1970 to mid-1970s: glass capillary gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry; E = mid-1970s to date: derivatives for HRGC, HPLC, mass spectrometry.
An enormous number of references exist pertinent to the isolation, identification, and biological studies of the great number of components in tobacco and tobacco smoke. To avoid considerable repetition, these are presented as a unified Bibliography which contains the references cited not only in this Introduction but also in each chapter. It is obvious that some references have been omitted but we assure the reader that any omission was not by design but was done unwittingly. The references cited for a particular tobacco and/or tobacco smoke component may deal simply with its identification or with a variety of topics pertinent to the particular component. Such topics may include the following: 1. The isolation and identification of the component. 2. The characterization of the component by classical chemical means, for example, the definition of the structure of solanesol isolated from flue-cured tobacco by Rowland et al. (3359), the characterization of a component by spectrographic means such as UV, IR, NMR, MS, and chromatographic retention time, for example, the identification by Snook et al. of numerous PAHs (3756-3758) and aza-arenes (3750) in cigarette MSS. 3. The search for the precursor in tobacco of a particular component in cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) (3616). 4. The quantitation of the component on a per gram of tobacco basis or on its per cigarette MSS yield. 5. Improvements/developments in the analytical technology to determine the per cigarette MSS and/or sidestream smoke (SSS) yield of the component, for example, see Table 6 in (3306b). 6. Studies on the biological activity of a particular component. 7. Discussions and/or assertions of the toxicity and/or tumorigenicity of a component in MSS, SSS, or ETS.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 30
11/24/08 3:16:36 PM
8. Studies on the inhibition of adverse biological activity of a tobacco smoke component by another component of the smoke, for example, the inhibition of the mouse-skin tumorigenicity of B[a]P by n-hentriacontane and n-pentatriacontane (4314, 4336), the inhibition of the mouse-skin tumorigenicity of DB[a,h]A by B[a]A (3814), the inhibition of the mutagenicity of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) by nicotine (2327a, 2327b). 9. Controversies over the extrapolation of the biological effect of a specific component administered individually vs. its biological effect when the component in a highly complex mixture such as MSS is administered to a different species, by a different route, and at a dose level far in excess of its level in the complex mixture (1318a, 3300, 3627). 10. Description of the design technologies to control the per cigarette MSS yield of Federal Trade Commission (FTC)-defined “tar” and a particular component, for example, see Table 16 in (3300). In many instances, the references cited for a particular component may also contain additional references pertinent to the component. The categories of chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke derived from our Master Catalog will be presented in the sequence shown in Table 0.1. These chapters will be followed the Bibliography and then an Alphabetical Component Index section. As information for the reader, Table 0.2 depicts the first page of the catalog for the alkanes (Table I.A-10). A similar component catalog is present in the chapter for each component class. Tobacco smoke, particularly cigarette smoke, is an aerosol comprising literally millions of liquid droplets suspended in a gaseous system [see Ingrebrethsen (1860)]. The liquid droplet portion of this smoke is defined as the particulate phase (PP); the gaseous portion as the vapor phase (VP). The particulate phase is also described alternatively in several ways depending on the context of the discussion; for example, the particulate phase collected by a variety of collection techniques such as the Cambridge filter pad, electrostatic precipitation, jet impaction, etc. [cf. review by Dube and Green (1067)] is termed wet total particulate matter (WTPM). Correction for the water content yields total particulate matter (TPM). Subtraction of the nicotine level from total particulate matter gives the FTCdefined “tar.” The reasons for exclusion of nicotine and water to give the FTC “tar” value were the long recognized nontoxicity of water plus the low toxicity of cigarette smoke nicotine as described in the 1964 report of the Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999). Thus, we have the following relationships among these entities:
TABLE 0.1 Sequence of Chemical Component Categories Chapter 1. I.A. I.B. I.C. I.D. I.E. I.F.
The Hydrocarbons The Alkanes The Alkenes and Alkynes The Alicyclic Hydrocarbons The Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Summary
Chapter 2. II.A. II.B.
Oxygen-Containing Components Alcohols and Phytosterols Alcohols Phytosterols
Chapter 3. Chapter 4 IV.A. IV.B. Chapter 5. Chapter 6. Chapter 7. Chapter 8. Chapter 9. IX.A. IX.B. Chapter 10.
Aldehydes and Ketones Acids Carboxylic Acids Amino Acids The Esters The Lactones Anhydrides Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives Phenols and Quinones Phenols Quinones The Ethers
Chapter 11. Chapter 12. Chapter 13. Chapter 14. Chapter 15. Chapter 16. Chapter 17. XVII.A. XVII.B. XVII.C. XVII.D. XVII.E. XVII.F. Chapter 18. XVIII.A. XVIII.B. Chapter 19. Chapter 20. Chapter 21. Chapter 22. Chapter 23. Chapter 24. Chapter 25. Chapter 26. Chapter 27. Chapter 28.
Nitrogen-Containing Components Nitriles Acyclic Amines Amides Imides N-Nitrosamines Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components Monocyclic Four- and Five-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds Monocyclic Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds Lactams Oxazoles and Oxazines Aza-arenes N-Heterocyclic Amines Miscellaneous Components Sulfur Compounds Halogenated Compounds Fixed and Variable Gases Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions and Salts Pesticides and Growth Regulators Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes “Hoffmann Analytes” Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients Pyrolysis Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens Free Radicals Summary
WTPM = TPM + H2O = FTC “tar” + nicotine + H2O The equation most frequently used in the United States since the late 1960s is the following: FTC “tar” = WTPM nicotine H2O
In many instances, the collected cigarette smoke particulate phase is called CSC. In many countries, cigarette “tar” is determined by use of the International Organization of Standardization (ISO)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 31
11/24/08 3:16:36 PM
TABLE 0.2 Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
method. The “tar” yield in the ISO method ISO 4387-1991 is calculated in the same manner as in the FTC method [Pillsbury et al. (2962)], that is, by subtraction of the water and nicotine from the WTPM collected (ISO 1991). The ISO
cigarette equilibration and smoking procedure differ slightly from those in the FTC procedure [see Table 1, p. 496 in Rustemeier and Piadé (3369a)]. These differences typically result in slightly lower measured yields for the ISO method
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 32
11/24/08 3:16:39 PM
vs. the FTC method. The measured values between FTC and ISO methods are within the detection limits of the test. They differ by no more than 0.4 mg for “tar” and no more than 0.04 mg for nicotine for cigarettes that yield over about 10 mg of “tar.” As described by Dixon and Borgerding (988a), under standard smoking regimes the ISO and FTC methods give very similar results. The physical nature of cigarette smoke is discussed below. Periodically during the past five decades, various reviews and catalog on the composition of tobacco smoke, with particular emphasis on cigarette MSS, have been published. These have dealt with the components of total MSS (the vapor-phase and the particulate-phase components) [Kosak (2170), Bentley and Berry (282, 283), Berry (296), Johnstone and Plimmer (1971), Izawa (1900), Philip Morris, Inc. (2939), Stedman (3797), Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884), IARC (1871)], with MSS particulate-phase components only or with MSS vapor-phase components only [Elmenhorst and Schultz (1140)], with both MSS and SSS components [Sakuma et al. (3394, 3397, 3398), R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) (3190), Klus (2133), Klus and Kuhn (2142)], with MSS, SSS, and ETS components [Brunnemann et al. (462), Eatough et al. (1099, 1100)], and with particular classes of smoke components, for example, nitrogen-containing components [Neurath (2724), Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491)] or PAHs [Elmenhorst and Reckzeh (1139)]. The majority of these reviews described the composition of smoke from cigarettes with a filler that was primarily tobacco. Although not published in the readily available scientific literature, substantial data are available from studies conducted on the smoke from cigarettes whose filler was not primarily tobacco but a “tobacco substitute” or a tobacco: “tobacco substitute” mixture. Inclusion of tobacco in the filler mixture ensures that the smoke will include the components usually found in an all-tobacco cigarette. Such data appear not only in documents from Celanese describing the composition of MSS from cigarettes containing only its Cytrel® product or in documents by Imperial Tobacco and Imperial Chemical Industries describing the MSS composition from cigarettes containing only their New Smoking Material® (NSM®) product but also in RJRT R&D reports which outline its studies on the composition of smoke from cigarettes made with Cytrel® only, NSM® only, the Sutton Smoking Material (SSM) only, or J-10 only (a tobacco substitute, comprising a puffed grain, developed in-house at RJRT). Recently, an article by Green et al. (1375a) on the effect of several tobacco substitutes on cigarette MSS composition has been published. At RJRT, all available data on the composition of MSS from cigarettes made with various tobacco types, tobacco blends, various “tobacco substitutes,” and/or cellulose have been routinely cataloged by R&D personnel, including one of the present authors (A.R.), for over five decades (2270, 2292a, 3224, 3245, 3252, 3253, 3301-3304, 3308). Until the early 1980s, the majority of the studies on tobacco smoke composition dealt with the composition of cigarette MSS. Particulate-phase composition was the major
research topic throughout the 1950s with studies on vaporphase composition receiving increased emphasis in the early 1960s when the biological response in laboratory animals could not be explained by nature and/or the level of any of the particulate-phase components acting individually or in concert.
TOBACCO SMOKE AND THE EXAMINATION OF ITS TUMORIGENICITY IN LABORATORY ANIMALS The initial research efforts were directed at attempts to identify the components in the CSC that could be responsible for the observed biological response in the CSC-painted animals. Immediately, the class of compounds selected for intense investigation was the PAHs. Why was this class of compounds selected? Primarily it was because of the twenty years of research effort since the initial findings in the early 1930s (194, 2078) that had shown that many PAHs were tumorigenic to mouse skin (1544), with several being classified as highly potent carcinogens to mouse skin (3306b). After more than a century of research during which investigators attempted to induce malignant tumors in laboratory animals by administration of a variety of industrial tars, soots, oils, etc., success was finally achieved by Yamagiwa and Ichikawa (4361) who reported the first induction of tumors in laboratory animals skin-painted with coal tar solutions. Their findings, which subsequently led to extensive research on the induction of malignant tumors by skin painting of laboratory animals with various tars and oils, also led to the definition in 1923 of the terms carcinogen, carcinogenesis, and carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis was defined as the induction of a carcinoma by the treatment. In 1930, a synthetic pentacyclic PAH, dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) {I} (760, 1184), was reported to be highly carcinogenic to mouse skin by Kennaway and Hieger (2078). In the early 1930s, Cook et al. (796a, 797) isolated several PAHs from two tons of coal tar. One of the PAHs, initially unknown, was demonstrated by characterization and synthesis to be benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) {II}, another pentacyclic PAH structurally similar to DB[a, h]A (see Figure 0.2). Subsequently it was demonstrated by Barry et al. (194) that B[a]P was also a potent carcinogen for the skin of susceptible mouse strains. The finding of the carcinogenicity of these two individual compounds, DB[a,h] A and B[a]P, was the stimulus for the synthesis and bioassay of literally hundreds of PAHs (and structurally similar nitrogen analogs) and their alkyl derivatives. Many of the PAHs with four or more fused rings were reported to be carcinogenic to mouse skin. A wealth of data was generated from research on attempts to correlate carcinogenic potency with PAH structure [Coulson (829), Pullman and Pullman (3003), Lacassagne et al. (2247a)]. The carcinogenic potency to mouse skin is dependent on the PAH structure and its substituents; for example, benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) {III} is a relatively weak carcinogen to mouse skin whereas its 7,12dimethyl homolog (DMBA) {IV} is an extremely potent one
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 33
11/24/08 3:16:39 PM
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene {I} CAS No. 53-70-3
Benzo[a]pyrene {II} CAS No. 50-32-8 CH3
CH3 Benz[a]anthracene {III} CAS No. 56-55-3
7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene {IV} CAS No. 57-97-6 CH3 H3C H3C CH3
Phenanthrene {V} CAS No. 85-01-8
1,2,3,4-Tetramethylphenanthrene {VI} CAS No. 4466-77-7
FIGURE 0.2 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
(983). The tricyclic PAH phenanthrene {V} is noncarcinogenic to mouse skin but its 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl homolog {VI} is slightly carcinogenic (983). Kennaway (2073–2076) reported that pyrolysis of a variety of organic compounds (methane, acetylene, isoprene, cholesterol) or mixtures containing organic compounds yielded pyrolysates which were tumorigenic to mouse skin. Subsequently, it was reported that a variety of carcinogenic PAHs, including B[a]P, were components of similar pyrolysates; for example, the pyrolysates from the tobacco smoke components methane [Burrows and Lindsey (529a)] and isoprene [Oró et al. (2864b)], as well as the pyrolysate from the tobacco phytosterols structurally similar to cholesterol [Wynder et al. (4355), Van Duuren (4022), Schmeltz et al. (3511), Severson et al. (3616)]. For several years in the early 1950s, whether PAHs were present in tobacco smoke was a highly controversial subject. The early claims of the presence of B[a]P in cigarette smoke were criticized by Kosak et al. (2177) in 1956 and by Fieser (1181) in 1957 because of the failure to duplicate the reported findings when similar analytical techniques were used. Logic dictated that the PAHs, including B[a]P, would indeed be present because they arise pyrogenetically from organic compounds under a variety of conditions. Several of the demonstrated PAH precursors are known to be components of tobacco used in a cigarette, cigar, or pipe. The smoking process involves pyrolysis and/or combustion. The differences between the effect of pyrolysis of an individual compound vs. the effect of the cigarette smoking process on the same compound in
the complex tobacco mixture were discussed by Rodgman et al. (3307) and their discussion will be summarized in a later chapter. However, even as late as 1957, Fieser, one of the eminent American authorities on tumorigenic PAHs, was not convinced that the presence of B[a]P in cigarette smoke had been demonstrated. Fieser (1181) discussed the available published data from various laboratories as follows: British [Cooper and Lindsey (820)] and American groups [Lefemine et al. (2335), Alvord and Cardon (55), Cardon and Alvord (593)] have claimed identification of benzpyrene following extensive chromatography of tars from cigarette smoke, but in each case the evidence of identity is correspondence of the smoke factor with the synthetic carcinogen in fluorescence spectrum, coupled with the correspondence of the two materials in one region of the ultraviolet absorption spectrum … In the absence of complete ultraviolet correspondence, the smoke-factor reported by the two groups of investigators can be described as nothing more than a benzpyrene-like substance, which may or may not be carcinogenic … Kuratsune (2237) [examined] the smoke from cigarettes of two Japanese brands and detected no benzpyrene … In my laboratory 20 g of cigarette smoke tar (from 500 cigarettes) to which 9.7 μg/g of benzpyrene was added was chromatographed … and rechromatographed … the recovery [of benzpyrene] was 7.8 μg/g of tar (80%) … In a parallel experiment with 20 g of the same tar and no additive, fractions corresponding to the positive fractions of the control were all negative … Our estimate was that benzpyrene could be present in amounts no greater than 1 part in 5 million parts of tar. Present evidence thus indicates that benzpyrene is formed in trace amounts on pyrolysis of constituents of tobacco (probably cellulosic), but that no appreciable amount passes into the smoke, and hence that this hydrocarbon is not the agent responsible for the observed carcinogenicity to mice of cigarette smoke tar [Wynder et al. (4306a)].
Fieser also reported that his colleagues Huang and Johnston failed to detect B[a]P in the MSS from American cigarettes even though they determined its level (80% recovery) in CSC “spiked” with B[a]P (1181). In Japan, Kuratsune, unable to demonstrate the presence of B[a]P in the CSC from Japanese cigarettes, was able to demonstrate its presence in roasted coffee beans and various other pyrolysates [Kuratsune (2237), Kuratsune and Hueper (2238)]. After subsequent studies by Orris et al. (2865) and Kiryu and Kuratsune (2099) or assessment of more complete laboratory data, Fieser (1182) and other critics reversed their earlier positions and eventually accepted that B[a]P was indeed present in tobacco smoke. The ultimate confirmation of the presence of B[a]P in cigarette smoke was its isolation in crystalline form and characterization by chemical means rather than reliance solely on the correspondence of the ultraviolet spectrum of the isolate with that of an authentic sample. Isolation of crystalline B[a]P from the MSS of a 70-mm nonfiltered cigarette was reported in 1956 by Rodgman (3240), by Hoffmann [see Wynder and Hoffmann (4307)] in 1959, and from a filtered cigarette in 1960 by Rodgman and Cook (3273). Fieser, the major architect of the chapter on smoke composition in the 1964 report of the Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999), had access to the published data by
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 34
11/24/08 3:16:41 PM
Wynder and Hoffmann (4307) on the isolation of crystalline B[a]P from cigarette smoke. However, numerous proponents of the adverse effect of cigarette smoke, for example, Wynder and Wright (4282a, 4354) and Wynder and Hoffmann (4307, 4312) asserted that the level of B[a]P in CSC or the levels of several tumorigenic PAHs, including B[a]P, could only account for a few percent of the biological response observed in mouse skin-painting studies with CSC. Since much of the post-1950 effort on MSS composition was directed to the definition of the cancer-causing agents in MSS possibly responsible for the association between lung cancer and cigarette smoke in smokers, it is a requisite that the various terms used in laboratory studies of tumor generation be understood. In their 1990 list, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) cataloged the tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components classified as “tumorigenic agents” and the range of the per cigarette MSS yields of each. Prior to examining the individual components on the list, an important distinction between “tumorigenicity” and “carcinogenicity” should be noted. In the 27th edition in 1988 of Dorland’s Medical Dictionary (1051b), the definition of carcinogenesis, first enunciated in 1923, is the same as that listed in the 13th edition issued in 1927 (1051b). Some investigators incorrectly use the term “carcinogenesis” for the production of any tumor type, not just for a carcinoma. The correct term, if used in this manner, is “tumorigenesis.” The term “carcinogen” is often applied, again often incorrectly, to any factor that induces any type of tumor. Common in the past, but seldom used now, was the term “sarcogenesis” used to describe the production of sarcoma, the endpoint obtained in many investigations in which the mode of administration of the compound under test, for example, a PAH, was by subcutaneous injection. Additionally, terms such as carcinogen, carcinogenicity, and/or carcinogenesis or sarcogen, sarcogenicity, and/or sarcogenesis should not be considered as fixed properties of compounds. It should be noted that in several of their early publications, Wynder and Hoffmann (4342, 4343a, 4346) and Hoffmann and Wynder (1801) carefully differentiated among the terms carcinogenesis, sarcogenesis, and tumorigenesis but eventually discontinued this practice. Other investigators have done the same. Because of the successful induction of cancer in a laboratory animal by Yamagiwa and Ichikawa (4361) and the discovery that several PAHs were tumorigenic when painted on the skin of laboratory animals (194, 797, 2078), the tumorigenicity of literally hundreds of PAHs (and structurally similar nitrogen analogs) and their alkyl derivatives was studied from 1932 to 1941. Many of the assertions made about the correlation between the laboratory findings and human experience were extremely farfetched and caused much confusion. This led to the request for Shear of the U.S. National Cancer Institute to attempt to return order to the field of carcinogenicity. The result was the classical description by Shear and Leiter (3627), a description whose pertinence is still valid. Carcinogenicity is a variable property, depending on a number of factors. It differs from other properties of a
compound that are fixed, for example, melting point, boiling point, refractive index, specific gravity, crystalline form. As noted by Shear and Leiter (3627), Hartwell (1544), and many others, a substance or factor can show a range of effects from carcinogenicity to noncarcinogenicity to anticarcinogenicity and the response will differ in the laboratory depending on the animal used (species, strain, sex, age), dose, route of administration (inhalation, ingestion, injection [subcutaneous, intravenous, intraperitoneal], skin painting, douching), mode of administration (single vs. multiple doses, neat, in solution, as an aerosol, as a vapor), diet supplied the animals, and cage care.
SMOKE-FORMATION PROCESSES, DISTRIBUTION (MSS, SSS, ETS), CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, AND ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION Cigarette smoke composition is dependent on two major processes occurring during the smoking of tobacco: the direct transfer by vaporization of volatile tobacco components directly to the smoke and the pyrogenesis of smoke components from tobacco components. The pyrogenesis involves a variety of reactions, including oxidation, reduction, aromatization, hydration, dehydration, condensation, cyclization, polymerization, depolymerization, etc. Table 0.3, adapted from Kosak (2170), lists the fewer than 100 tobacco smoke components reported in the scientific literature to that date. Examination of his compilation reveals the following: 1. Of the approximately eighty entries, the identities of thirty-three (over 40%) of the components were questioned by Kosak because he did not “consider the evidence cited in the literature to be definitive proof” of their identities. 2. Two of the listed items (B[a]P, “condensed aromatics”) were reported by Roffo (3323, 3324) whose research did not involve the study of tobacco smoke but involved a study of material obtained by the “destructive distillation” of tobacco. 3. Several of the alkaloid-related components (A-, B-, and G-socratine, obelin, lohitam, anodmin, lathraein, poikiline, and gudham) first reported by Wenusch and Schöller (4210, 4211) and listed under Alkaloids were subsequently demonstrated to be mixtures or a component listed elsewhere in Table 0.3. For example, Kuffner et al. (2224) demonstrated that obelin was a salt of ammonia, Aand B-socratine were mixtures of nicotyrine and 2,3`-bipyridine, and G-socratine was l-nornicotine. Poikiline was characterized as 4-amino-1-(3pyridyl)-butanone. Many of these characterization corrections are described in Johnstone and Plimmer (1971).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 35
11/24/08 3:16:41 PM
TABLE 0.3 Tobacco Smoke Components Listed by Kosak (2170) Class
Component
Class
Component
Class
Component
Hydrocarbons
Hentriacontane (?) Acetylene “Unsaturated hydrocarbons” Azulene Phenanthrene (?) Anthracene (?) Benzopyrene (?) “Condensed aromatics” (?)
Ketones
3-Pentanone 4-Heptanone 17-Tritriacontanone (?) 2,3-Butanedione “Higher” ketones (?)
Acids
Alcohols and Phenols
Methanol Glycerol Diethylene glycol a Ethylene glycol a Phenol (?) Catechol (?)
Alkaloids
Nicotine Pyridyl ethyl ketone Myosmine Nicotyrine A-Socratinec B-Socratinec G-Socratinec Obelinc Lohitamc Anodminc Lathraeinc Poikilinec Gudhamc
Miscellaneous Components
Formic acid Acetic acid Butyric acid Valeric acid Caproic acid C7 and C8 aliphatic acids (?) Succinic acid (?) Fumaric acid (?) Citric acid (?) Benzoic acid (?) Phenolic acids (?) Levoglucosan d “Phytosterol” (?) C10H14O (a furan ?) “Resins” (?) “Resin acids” (?)
Aldehydes
Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Butyraldehyde Acrolein (?) Benzaldehyde 2-Furaldehyde (?) b
Other Ncontaining components
Pyrrole (?) “Pyrroles” (?) “N-Methylpyrrolidines” (?) Pyridine “Picoline” (?) “Lutidine” (?) “Collidine” (?) “Pyridine bases” (?) Methylamine (?) “Chlorophyll degradation products” (?) “Uric acids” (?)
Inorganic Components
Ammonia Carbon monoxide Carbon dioxide Hydrogen cyanide Hydrogen sulfide Thiocyanic acid (?) Oxygen Arsenic e “Acetates” (?) “Chlorides” (?) “Cyanides” (?) “Nitrates” (?)
a
In smoke because of transfer of an humectant added to tobacco. The question mark indicates that Kosak did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. c Subsequent study demonstrated this component was not a well-defined compound but an artifact, a mixture, or an ammonium salt [see discussion by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971)]. d 1,6-Anhydro-B-D-glucopyranose. e Probably present as As O . 2 3. b
4. Kosak listed references to phenol (1857, 4202), catechol (2107, 4202), and “phenolic acids” (3324) as tobacco smoke components. However, he failed to report the 1952 presentation by Rayburn (3089) of the unequivocal identification of phenol, guaiacol (2-methoxyphenol), o-cresol (2-methylphenol), and m-cresol (3-methylphenol) in the smokes from the four major tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Maryland, and Oriental).
5. Azulene, a bicyclic C10H8 hydrocarbon isomeric with naphthalene, was first reported as a tobacco smoke component by Ikeda (1857) and subsequently by Gilbert and Lindsey (1287, 1288), Lindsey (2365), and Lyons (2426). Despite improved analytical technology and hundreds of studies on the identification of PAHs in tobacco smoke, very few reports of its identification have appeared since those in the 1950s. This suggests
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 36
11/24/08 3:16:41 PM
the possibility that the azulene reported in tobacco smoke condensate in the 1940s and 1950s may have been formed artifactually. In summary, Kosak’s 1954 list, shown in Table 0.3, included only about fifty components the identities of which were certain. The number of identified components in cigarette tobacco smoke has increased almost 100-fold from the fifty definitively identified tobacco smoke components listed by Kosak (2170) to the more than 5300 components identified to date and cataloged by RJRT personnel. Components were originally included in the RJRT catalog only if their identification criteria satisfy the identification criteria of classical organic chemistry. Later, identification criteria from modern analytical chemistry were employed. From 1950 to 1955, the early years of the great escalation of interest in the composition of cigarette smoke, “isolations” were often accomplished with no regard to the possibility of artifact formation. Also, “identifications” of tobacco smoke components were often based on less than complete spectral data, for example, the PAHs and their ultraviolet spectra, Rf values, color tests, and the like. Because of the state of the art of the isolation techniques available in the early 1950s, the level in smoke of a component under investigation often precluded its isolation in quantities sufficient for application of the classical chemical techniques (melting point and mixture melting point determinations, derivative preparation, elemental analysis, etc.) used for identification. The authors of some of the early reviews and catalogs on tobacco smoke composition listed the smoke components reported in the literature without regard to the analytical validity of their identification. This problem has progressively decreased over the years as analytical technology has increased in sophistication. Few, if any, commercial products have experienced the analytical scrutiny that has been applied to tobacco smoke or tobacco. The composition of coffee has been examined but the number of components identified is less than 25% of the number identified in tobacco smoke. Despite the identification of over 5200 additional smoke components since the 1954 listing by Kosak, various investigators have estimated from gas chromatographic scans that for each component identified in tobacco smoke there are five to twenty components present at extremely low per cigarette yields that have not yet been identified. Thus, as noted by Wakeham (4103) when the identified tobacco smoke components numbered about 1350: “Gas chromatographic scans indicate there are many more, probably over ten thousand, possibly even a hundred thousand [tobacco smoke components].” Grob (1422), one of the pioneers of the use of glass capillary gas chromatography in tobacco smoke composition studies, as well as other tobacco smoke investigators, also noted that the number of peaks, each of which represented at least one component, in the chromatographic scans far exceeded the number of components identified.
In addition to the advancement in knowledge of the chemical composition of cigarette smoke was the advancement in the knowledge of its physical properties, that of an aerosol. An aerosol is defined as a colloidal system of dispersed liquid or solid material in a gaseous medium. Cigarette smoke is an aerosol comprising liquid droplets in a gas. For nearly two decades, investigators have accumulated knowledge on the conditions involved in the formation of MSS and SSS aerosols during the smoking of a cigarette and the factors contributing to or modifying their yields and composition. Theories on smoke formation in vogue in the late 1950s and early 1960s were demonstrated to be incorrect; for example, many investigators thought that all smoke components not originally present in tobacco and thus appearing in the MSS by pyrogenesis from the tobacco were formed at or near the fire cone at temperatures in excess of 900°C. New and more nearly correct theories replaced the old ones. Advances in our knowledge of smoke formation and transport were possible because of improved technologies developed to accomplish the following tasks, see Townsend (3941a): 1. Accurately measure temperatures during puffs and during the smolder period between puffs at various sites within the burning cigarette and its fire cone. 2. Follow the formation of specific components and their subsequent passage and transport, in the case of MSS components, through the tobacco rod by puff-driven volatilization, repetitive condensations and revolatilizations, filtration by tobacco rod and filter tip material, etc. 3. Follow the formation of specific components and their subsequent emission, in the case of SSS components, to the atmosphere. Baker (163a, 166) has written at length on his original research and that of others on MSS and SSS aerosols and the conditions involved in the cigarette in their formation and transport. He has also periodically authored or coauthored several excellent and detailed reviews (167, 169, 170a, 171a, 171b, 174d) on this subject. It is now known that the fire cone temperature of 900+°C measured during the puff primarily generates gaseous components such as the carbon oxides, water, ammonia, nitric oxide, etc. During the puff, pyrogenesis of most MSS components occurs in a 3- to 4-mm cylinder of the tobacco rod a few millimeters behind the fire cone:tobacco rod interface where the temperature ranges from 500 to 650°C. During the smolder period, the fire cone temperature is 500 to 600°C, and it is at this temperature range that SSS is generated from the tobacco. Just as profound quantitative differences exist among the chemical compositions of fresh and aged MSS, fresh and aged SSS, and ETS, there are several differences in the physical properties of these smokes. One physical property
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 37
11/24/08 3:16:41 PM
important in these various types of cigarette smoke, their inhalation, and their retention is their particle size. There are several ways to describe particle size. A frequently used one is mean mass aerodynamic diameter (MMAD). In his review of the aerosol studies on cigarette smoke, Ingebrethsen (1860) points out that two factors are extremely important with respect to the measured particle size of an aerosol: (1) the time between aerosol generation and particle size measurement, and (2) the concentration of the aerosol. High aerosol concentration and extended time between generation and measurement result in increased coagulation of particles and increased particle size. Freshly generated MSS and SSS have the major fraction of particle sizes, expressed as MMAD, in the range 0.3 to 0.4 μm [Ingebrethsen (1860c)]. Since SSS—both intra- and inter-puff generated—is the major contributor, estimated at 85% to 90%, to ETS, it is important to realize that its physical properties are constantly and progressively changing. These changes begin the moment it is generated and continue during its extensive dilution as it disperses through the room until it is eventually perceived as ETS. Depending on the proximity of the measuring device to the source of the SSS, it is obvious that a range of particle sizes could be found, ranging from that measured in freshly generated SSS to that found in essentially equilibrated ETS. The behavior of particles in SSS under carefully controlled conditions has been studied in detail by Ingebrethsen and Sears (1860e). Another problem of determining the contribution of ETS to a given air space (home, office, restaurant, aircraft, etc.) is that other non-ETS contributors to VP and PP are measured at the same time as the contribution of ETS to VP and PP is measured. These include contributions from cooking oils and foods in homes and restaurants, cleaning preparations and furniture polishes, personal products (perfumes, after-shave lotions, hair sprays, deodorants, etc.), and vehicular exhausts where the air space is adjacent to much traveled roads. Chromatographic scans of samples collected in a conference room before and after a two-hour meeting during which smoking was permitted revealed that chromatographic peaks, some representing compounds from nontobacco sources, were much larger than those known to be due to ETS (1352a). Similar findings were reported by Bayer and Black (223), who compared volatile organic contaminants (VOCs) in the offices of smokers and nonsmokers. The authors noted: Building materials and furnishings are the most common source of these VOCs. [The] VOC building background makes it difficult to distinguish ETS contamination from the VOCs out-gassing from other sources.
A major distinction between MSS and SSS that affects particle size is that MSS is acidic*, with a pH ranging from 6.0 to 6.6, whereas the pH of SSS ranges from 6.7 to 7.5. The SSS from most cigarettes is alkaline, with pH above 7.0. Under acidic conditions (pH < 7.0), smoke amines such as nicotine are considered to be protonated and have relatively *
The MSS from cigarettes fabricated from dark air-cured tobacco or aircured cigar-type tobacco shows a slightly alkaline pH.
low volatility. Under alkaline conditions (pH > 7.0), such amines are considered to be nonprotonated, that is, “free,” and are relatively more volatile. The differences and similarities in the physical properties among MSS, SSS, and ETS are summarized in Table 0.4. When freshly generated MSS is inhaled during smoking, the aerosol particles in the smoke are exposed in the respiratory tract to an atmosphere whose temperature is 37°C and whose relative humidity exceeds 95%. As a result, the inhaled particles absorb water and increase in size. Those particles that are exhaled are, on average, 20% to 25% larger than the inhaled particles (273, 1860b, 1860d, 1860e). When these water-saturated exhaled MSS particles (temperature at 37°C) are released into the atmosphere (temperature generally below 30°C and relative humidity below 50%), they cool, and immediately undergo several evaporative processes which are completed in a few milliseconds. These processes include the following: 1. Components, usually gaseous under ambient conditions, evaporate from the particle. 2. Components with modest vapor pressures evaporate from the particle. 3. Water, incorporated into the particle either during the smoke formation process in the tobacco rod or during its residence time in the highly humid confines of the respiratory tract, evaporates. SSS particles behave much differently than MSS particles. Although little research has been conducted on fresh, undiluted SSS, it is reasonable to expect that the particles are physically similar to those in MSS. However, the high dilution that occurs almost immediately upon generation has the effect of preventing coagulation and promoting evaporative losses. Also, because of the alkalinity of SSS, basic components are nonprotonated and readily evaporate from the particle. Studies in 1985 by Eudy et al. (1169) on SSS and ETS, both generally alkaline (pH > 7.0), indicated that little (<5%) of the nicotine remains in the ETS particle; the bulk of it (>95%) evaporates from the particle and appears in the VP. As a result of these various processes, the SSS and exhaled MSS particles, on their way to contribute to ETS, decrease both in particle mass and in particle size to an MMAD ranging from 0.15 to 0.20 μm for the major fraction of the particles. Experimental data for the decrease in SSS particle size were presented by Ingebrethsen and Sears (1860e, 1860f). Ten minutes after smoke generation, a major fraction of the SSS particles showed a particle size with an average MMAD of 0.198 μm. It should be noted that these various evaporative processes involve relatively volatile smoke components. The particle size is not diminished to any appreciable degree by evaporation of nonvolatile and high molecular weight components, such as the PAHs (B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dibenz[a,i]pyrene) listed by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) and Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741), and other components such as solanesol, the phytosterols, A-tocopherol, and the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 38
11/24/08 3:16:42 PM
TABLE 0.4 Physical Propertiesa of Mainstream Smoke (MSS), Sidestream Smoke (SSS), and Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Properties Number of identified components
Approximate temperature of ràSFDPOF rTNPLFGPSNBUJPO Approximate % of tobacco rod consumedb Particle size, μm
Particle concentration, number/cm3 Retention of particulate matter in respiratory tract
Smoke pH
MSS
SSS
ETS
Over 4300 in particulate phase (PP); about 1000 in vapor phase (VP). Some components are present in both the PP and VP; e.g., HCN, simple phenols, volatile N-nitrosamines.
Composition assumed to be qualitatively similar to that of MSS; i.e., the number and identity of the SSS and ETS components are the same as those in MSS. Quantitative differences in component levels are substantial. The distribution of a component between PP and VP depends on the nature (acid, base, neutral) and the physical properties (vapor pressure, etc.) of the particular component. The decay (decrease) of an individual ETS component is also dependent on numerous factors such as its nature, its physical properties, and the temperature, relative humidity (RH), ventilation, and nature of surfaces (carpets, drapes, upholstered furnishings, etc.) in the smoke space.
850-950°C 500-600°C 30-40
500-650°C 500-600°C 50-60
Fresh whole MSS particles have MMAD = 0.3-0.4 μm c contain volatile components which readily vaporize from the particles.
Fresh SSS particles are about the same size as MSS particles; within a short time (<10 min) after generation, the MMAD > 0.2 μmc for SSS particles.
Because of coagulation, hydration, evaporative transfer and other physical processes, e.g., the cloud effect, MSS particles behave as though they have a MMAD in the micron range c. 109 to 1010
During dilution to ETS, exhaled MSS particles lose H2O and other volatile PP components; particle size decreases to a MMAD = 0.15-0.20 μmc. SSS particles lose H2O and other volatile PP components such as nicotine, amines, etc. Thus, particle size decreases to a MMAD = 0.15-0.20 μmc. ~1-5 x 105
50 to 90%
10 to 11%
Percentage retention as measured by weight loss between time of inhalation and exhalation due to mechanical trapping plus loss of volatiles from inhaled particles.
Low percentage retention as measured by weight loss is due to virtual absence of coagulation and other physical phenomenon, e.g., cloud effects, and lack of water and other volatile components which may be lost by inhaled ETS particles. Neutral (pH 7.0) to slightly alkaline.
6.0 to 6.6 for cigarette MSS d.
Inhalability of smoke into lungs
MSS inhalability favored by pH less than 7.0.
Nicotine behavior
99+% of nicotine in cigarette MSS is in the PP; because the MSS pH is much less than 7.0, amines such as nicotine are protonated; nicotine in MSS PP is presumed to be protonated by the low molecular weight acids present in MSS e
6.7 to 7.5 for cigarette SSS. Some investigators have reported SSS pH values as high as 8.0 Inhalability of smoke (whether cigarette SSS, pipe MSS, or cigar MSS) is progressively diminished as smoke pH increases above pH 7.0.
Because of alkalinity of SSS and the high concentration of SSS particles near the burning cone, nicotine (and other volatile smoke components) are distributed between the SSS PP and SSS VP; PP-VP equilibrium for these compounds is not attained adjacent to the cigarette burning cone.
Because of extreme dilution by air and near neutrality (pH close to 7.0), the inhalability of ETS is nearly the same as that of air. Because of the extremely high dilution of ETS and its pH at or slightly above 7.0, little nicotine (or other amines) is found in ETS PP; more than 95% of the nicotine in ETS is in the non- protonated form and is found in ETS VP. (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 39
11/24/08 3:16:42 PM
TABLE 0.4 (CONTINUED) Physical Propertiesa of Mainstream Smoke (MSS), Sidestream Smoke (SSS), and Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Properties Relationship of smoke yield to cigarette design
MSS MSS controllable by rUPCBDDPSPEMFOHUIBOEDJSDVNGFSFODF ràMUFSUZQFBOEEJNFOTJPOT ràMUFSUJQBEEJUJWFT rUPCBDDPCMFOEBOEXFJHIU rQSPDFTTFEUPCBDDP SFDPOTUJUVUJPO expansion) rQBQFSBOEQBQFSBEEJUJWFT rBJSEJMVUJPO QBQFSQPSPTJUZBOEàMUFS perforation)
SSS Inter-puff SSS, the major contributor to total SSS, is primarily controlled by cigarette tobacco blend and weight and to a lesser degree by paper properties and additives.
ETS Since ETS comprises 85-90% diluted and aged SSS plus 10-15% exhaled MSS, the control of ETS resides primarily with those factors which control intrapuff SSS generation.
a
Properties listed are those for unaged and undiluted smoke. Tobacco rod not consumed during smoking estimated at 5 to 8% for filtered cigarettes; 20 to 25% for non-filtered cigarettes. c MMAD value listed is that for a major fraction of the smoke. d The MSS from cigarettes fabricated from dark air-cured tobacco or air-cured cigar-type tobacco shows a slightly alkaline pH. e Protonation of nicotine in tobacco due to long-chained acids (palmitic acid, stearic acid, etc.) and polycarboxylic acids (oxalic acid, malic acid, citric acid). b
saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons. These components remain in the particles. In addition to the dilution that occurs when the ETS particles disperse through the room space, an additional dilution occurs by the deposition of ETS particles on the surfaces present. These processes—evaporation, dispersion, and deposition—decrease the concentration of ETS particles. Ventilation, air exchanges per unit time, nature of the surfaces (fabric, plastic, wood, etc.), temperature, relative humidity, number of cigarettes smoked per unit time, and number of persons present are some of the known variables that will also influence the concentration of ETS particles. Questions are frequently raised about the particle size of MSS, SSS, and ETS and the relationship between particle size and retention in the respiratory tract of the inhaled smoke. Usually, particle size plays an important role in determining mainstream particulate retention in the lungs. Based on a comparison of particle size, one might expect ETS and MSS to be retained similarly in human lungs on a percentage basis. Empirical data demonstrate that this is not the case. In the case of MSS, other factors come into play. These drastically alter the amount of MSS particulate matter that is retained. Weight-loss measurements give values ranging from 50% to 90% for the percentage retention of inhaled MSS (1860c). The percentage retention is a characteristic of the individual smoker. The retention of inhaled MSS is much higher than would be predicted by the measured MMAD of fresh smoke, 0.3 to 0.4 μm. Ingebrethsen (1860c) reviewed the literature on the retention of MSS and identified five factors that may be responsible for increased MSS particle retention. These include coagulation, electrical charge, growth by
water condensation, evaporative transfer, and cloud effects. Evaporative transfer and cloud effects were deemed to be the most significant factors. Recently, Moldoveanu et al. (2601b) and Moldoveanu and St. Charles (2601a) reported on the different degrees of retention by humans of 160 cigarette MSS components by comparison of their levels in smoking machine-generated MSS vs. their levels in smoker-exhaled MSS. ETS particles behave quite differently from MSS particles in terms of human retention. Unlike MSS, the retention of ETS in the lung is not affected by evaporative transfer and cloud effects. Instead, ETS retention is influenced mainly by particle size. Theoretical calculations indicate that the percentage retention of particles equivalent in size to ETS particles should vary between 10% and 20%. A value within the theoretical range was obtained: Hiller et al. from studies with human mouth-breathing volunteer nonsmokers who orally inhaled polystyrene latex spheres of particle sizes similar to those of diluted sidestream smoke (1654a) and five volunteers who inhaled a tobacco smoke defined as “sidestream smoke at a concentration similar to that encountered indoors with smokers present” (1654b), estimated the percentage retention of the smoke to be 11%. The difference in particle retention between MSS and ETS is due largely to the high dilution that SSS particles experience almost upon formation. This dilution causes ETS particles to behave as model, nonvolatile, inert particles by preventing coagulation, obviating cloud effects, and promoting evaporation prior to inhalation. As noted earlier (Table 0.4), numerous technologies introduced sequentially from the mid-1950s to the late 1960s were
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 40
11/24/08 3:16:42 PM
Replacement of all-flue-cured or all-Oriental tobaccos with a blend of flue-cured, burley, and Oriental tobaccos
1913
50.0
3.00 Filter tips Reconstituted tobacco Paper additives
40.0
2.50
Paper porosity 2.00
Ventilation
30.0
1.50 20.0
NICOTINE, mg
‘TAR,’ mg
Expanded tobacco
1.00 10.0
0.50 ‘TAR’
0.0 1954
1958
NICOTINE 1962
1966
1970 Year
1974
1978
1982
0.00 1986
FIGURE 0.3 “Tar” and nicotine yields, sales-weighted average basis, U.S. cigarette products.
incorporated into cigarette design to control MSS yield and composition, which some have characterized as a “less hazardous” cigarette when included in cigarette design [Gori and Bock (1334b), National Cancer Institute (2683), USPHS (4005, 4009)]. These technologies include: 1. 2. 3. 4.
Tobacco blend and weight Tobacco rod length and circumference Filter tips (material type and additives) Processed tobaccos (reconstituted tobacco sheet, expanded tobacco) 5. Paper (type and additives) 6. Air dilution (increased paper porosity, filter tip perforations)
The chronology of introduction of these technologies in U.S. cigarette products is noted in Figure 0.3. Over the years, use of these technologies in concert and to various degrees in cigarette design has provided the consumer with a great variety of products whose number has increased from about a dozen in the mid-1950s to nearly 1250 in 1995 (1177c). It should be remembered that the cigarette is a system: All of these technologies used in cigarette design are interactive, that is, inclusion of or change in the level of use of any particular technology may require other adjustments in the cigarette design to maintain certain attributes acceptable to the consumer. In contrast, by current technology, SSS yield is controlled almost totally by tobacco blend and weight. The SSS is not subjected to filtration, the effect of filter-tip
additives that specifically remove certain MSS components from MSS (phenols, volatile N-nitrosamines), or air dilution effects. Adams et al. (31) reported data on MSS and SSS yields of fourteen components in the smokes from four U.S. commercial cigarettes of different design: a nonfilter cigarette, two filtered cigarettes, and a perforated filter cigarette. MSS and SSS yield data for TPM; nicotine; a PAH, (B[a]P); a phenol, catechol; a volatile N-nitrosamine, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA); and a tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine, N-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) are summarized in Table 0.5. The SSS TPM yields shown in Table 0.5 for the nonfiltered and two filtertipped cigarettes are, on average, about 58% higher than the SSS TPM yield from the perforatedfilter cigarette. Most perforated-filter cigarettes, such as Perforated Filter-D in Table 0.5, not only incorporate a perforated filter with a high percentage air dilution to reduce MSS TPM but also incorporate substantial levels (30% to 50%) of expanded tobacco in the cigarette design. The inclusion of such a large percentage of expanded tobacco in the blend substantially reduces the weight of tobacco in the tobacco rod and the weight of tobacco consumed during the SSSgenerating smolder periods. Thus, these data show the SSS TPM yield from the perforated-filter cigarette is substantially less (37%) than the average of the SSS TPM from the other three cigarettes. In a more recent study on the MSS and SSS yields from cigarettes classified as low tar, Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (723, 724a) provided data that differ substantially from
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 41
11/24/08 3:16:43 PM
TABLE 0.5 MSS/SSS Distribution of Selected Components Delivered by Four U.S. Commercial Cigarettes Non-Filtered A Smoke Component, Yield/cig TPM, mg Nicotine, mg Catechol, mg B[a]P, ng NDMA, ng NNN, ng
Filtered B
MSS
SSS
MSS
20.1 2.04 41.9 26.2 31.1 1007
22.6 4.62 58.2 67.0 735 857
15.6 1.50 71.2 17.8 4.3 88
the Adams et al. (31) data in Table 0.5 and from other data (3190) reported for comparable “tar”-yield cigarettes. The differences in the data for comparable FTC “tar”-yield cigarettes were found for cigarettes delivering approximately 23, 10, and 7 mg. In their MSS and SSS collection and analysis, Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (724a) used their previously reported SSS collection procedure (723) in the generation of their data. Green (1353) commented on several deficiencies in the procedures used and interpretations made by Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (724a) from their data. Examination of their data and comparison of them with the Adams et al. (31) and RJRT (3190) data (see Table 0.6) reveal an additional problem: For the three cigarette categories (23-, 10-, and 7-mg FTC “tar” yields), the SSS/MSS ratios for the TPMs in the Chortyk–Schlotzhauer study were between two and seven times greater than those reported in the other studies. Similarly for nicotine, the Chortyk–Schlotzhauer SSS/MSS ratios were from about 1.5 to over seven times greater than those reported in the other studies. This strongly suggested a problem with their SSS collection procedure.
Filtered C
Perforated Filter D
SSS
MSS
SSS
MSS
SSS
24.4 4.14 89.9 45.7 597 307
6.8 0.81 26.9 12.2 12.1 273
20.0 3.54 69.5 51.7 611 185
0.9 0.15 9.1 2.2 4.1 66.3
14.1 3.16 117 44.8 685 338
The escalation of the number of identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components is depicted in Figure 0.1. This tremendous increase in the number of identified tobacco smoke (and tobacco) components was made possible by successive advances in analytical technology, particularly the technology pertinent to the separation of components in complex mixtures. It is realized that investigators who pioneered an emerging analytical technology were often involved with the development and/or use of the technology prior to the period indicated in Figure 0.3. No slight of their noteworthy contributions is intended. The periods indicated in Figure 0.3 are those when the analytical technology in question was sufficiently advanced and used by almost all investigators involved in the analysis of tobacco smoke and/or definition of its composition. Prior to the early 1950s, the major part of tobacco smoke component isolation effort involved so-called “classical” chemical techniques, that is, separation of the smoke condensate into neutral, acidic (acids and phenols), and basic
TABLE 0.6 Comparison of SSS/MSS Ratios for Different Cigarette Types Chortyk and Schlotzhauer
Adams et al.(31) 20-mg Cigarette a
23-mg Cigarette (724a)
23-mg Cigarette (723)
Analyte
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
TPM Nicotine
20.1 2.04
22.6 4.62
1.12 2.26
21.8 1.68
56 9.08
2.57 5.40
22.9 1.30
54.9 5.29
2.40 4.07
R.J. Reynolds (3190)
Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (724a)
1R4F
10-mg Cigarette
10-mg Cigarette
Analytea
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
TPM Nicotine
11.5 0.79
16.9 5.60
1.47 7.09
10.4 0.90
60 9.10
5.77 10.11
9.5 1.05
53 10.46
5.58 9.96
Adams et al. (31)
Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (724a)
7-mg Cigarette Analyte
a
TPM Nicotine a
7-mg Cigarette
6-mg Cigarette
6-mg Cigarette
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
MSS
SSS
SSS/MSS
6.8 0.81
20.0 3.54
2.94 4.37
6.7 0.58
59 8.95
8.81 15.43
5.4 0.22
60 7.04
11.11 32.00
6.0 0.55
50 8.06
8.33 20.77
mg/cig
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 42
11/24/08 3:16:44 PM
fractions by partitioning between water-immiscible organic solvents and water, aqueous basic solutions, and/or aqueous acidic solutions, followed by crystallizations and/or distillations of the subfractions. In the early 1950s, liquid column chromatography on column packings such as alumina, silicic acid, or Fluorosil® of the neutral, acidic, or basic fractions, as appropriate, permitted further separation of the components prior to application of the classical chemical techniques. UV and IR spectrometry were also available and used not only to combine chromatographic fractions rich in a specific component but also to assist in the identification of the component. UV absorption and fluorescence spectrophotometry were extremely useful in identification of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. In the late 1950s to early 1960s, commercial equipment for gas chromatography became available. This technique, coupled with those mentioned previously, augmented the investigator’s ability to separate, isolate, and identify smoke components. Mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance equipment and techniques were also more readily available and became additional tools that facilitated component identification. In the early days of gas chromatography, there were fewer than a dozen chromatographic column packings commercially available and most of these did not permit satisfactory separations above 200°C. By the late 1960s, the number of available column packings had increased, and the properties of newly designed column packing materials permitted separations at temperatures approaching 350°C. In the early 1960s, investigators such as Grob (1413) began study on capillary gas chromatography and subsequently glass capillary gas chromatography. A major contribution by Grob was his development of methods to prepare and coat the inner wall of a capillary tube to increase its effectiveness and efficiency in separations. By the late 1960s to early 1970s, this emerging technology, glass capillary gas chromatography, had become an extremely powerful analytical tool and was used to great advantage in the study of the complex mixtures tobacco smoke, see Grob (1416–1419, 1422) and Grob and Völlmin (1426, 1427), and tobacco extracts [Lloyd et al. (2389)]. The glass capillary column was usually a smalldiameter (about 1 mm or so) glass or quartz tube, extremely long (50 to 300–400 m) whose interior was not packed with a solid adsorbent or an inert material mixed with a liquid adsorbent as in the previously used gas chromatographic columns. The inner wall of the narrow-bore capillary was coated with a thin layer of a liquid adsorbent. This technology not only enhanced separation capability but permitted separations to be made with extremely small samples. These advances in analytical technology were usually accompanied by a break and an increased slope in the plot of number of identified tobacco smoke components vs. time (see Figure 0.1). The next break in the plot and increased slope occurred in the mid-1970s when more and more investigators enhanced the effectiveness of glass capillary gas chromatography by coupling the gas chromatograph to a mass spectrometer. This permitted separation of the components of the particular tobacco smoke fraction under study and
determination of the molecular weight and/or fracture pattern of each component as it exited the chromatograph and was analyzed in the mass spectrometer. Interpretation of the data thus obtained, usually in concert with findings from UV, IR, and/or NMR spectra, permitted very rapid and unequivocal identification of the components from the smoke fraction (1426, 1427). An outstanding example of the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the definition of tobacco smoke composition is the study by Snook et al. (3756–3759) on the PAHs in cigarette MSS. Over 500 individual PAHs and their homologs were detected, and many were identified unequivocally. The early- to mid-1970s also saw the emergence of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (830a, 1361), a highly efficient and effective variation of liquid column chromatography. The traditional method used to examine CSC (or a tobacco extract) usually involved its initial partition between an aqueous alcohol solution and a water-immiscible organic solvent such as hexane, cyclohexane, or diethyl ether. The organic solvent-soluble material was then separated into several neutral, acidic, and basic fractions. These, in turn, were then subjected to the various analytical techniques available at the time. Considerable success was attained in isolation and identification of the organic solvent-soluble smoke components. For many years, however, there was no satisfactory technique available to separate, isolate, and identify the many components in the aqueous alcohol fraction from the aqueous alcohol-water immiscible organic solvent partition. Many of the aqueous alcohol-soluble components are highly polar, highly oxygenated compounds, and no chromatographic system was available to effect clean separations. In addition, many of these components, because of their structures, were highly labile at the temperatures used in gas chromatographic separation. By use of the technology known as silylation, these sometime heat-sensitive, highly polar components were converted to chromatographable stable silyl derivatives which can be readily separated by glass capillary gas chromatography and identified by mass and other spectral techniques. By use of the latest analytical technology available at the time, the mainstream CSC from a typical cigarette was reexamined with particular emphasis on the composition of the aqueous alcohol-soluble material. The separation and identification of over 750 previously unidentified tobacco smoke components were described by Schumacher et al. (3553), Newell et al. (2769), and Heckman and Best (1587). A striking example of the effectiveness of the improved analytical technology on tobacco smoke component identification is the following. In 1977, Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) cataloged about 420 nitrogen-containing components identified in MSS. They indicated that the number of identified nitrogen-containing tobacco smoke components had increased by about 200 since a previous review of nitrogen-containing tobacco smoke components by Neurath (2724). In a presentation and publication, Heckman and Best (1587) described the separation and identification of nearly 270 new nitrogen-containing smoke components, an increase of more than 60% over the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 43
11/24/08 3:16:44 PM
number described by Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) in their review article. The following is another example of the impact the improved analytical technologies had on the ability to further define the composition of tobacco smoke: In the late 1950s to early 1960s, the composition of an aliphatic ester fraction isolated from flue-cured tobacco by Rowland and Latimer (3358) and from cigarette MSS by Rodgman et al. (3294) was partially defined in both cases by Rodgman et al. (3294). By saponification of the aliphatic ester fraction, followed by separation of the alcohol and acid moieties, Rodgman et al. showed that the tobacco- and tobacco smokederived aliphatic ester fractions were qualitatively the same and theoretically comprised at least 272 esters formed from at least seventeen aliphatic acids [myristic (C14) to octacosanoic (C28), oleic, linoleic, and linolenic] and sixteen normal long-chained, primary aliphatic alcohols [1-dodecanol (C12) to 1-heptacosanol (C27)]. In 1984, with improved chromatographic capability and a mass spectrometric system capable of detecting much higher molecular weights than those used by Rodgman et al. in 1961, Arrendale et al. (103) reexamined the aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco. The saponification and subsequent separation of acids and alcohols were no longer required. Arrendale et al. were able to identify unequivocally many of the individual esters by glass capillary gas chromatography and mass spectroscopic examination of the aliphatic ester fraction isolated from the tobacco. The alcohol moiety of the esters identified ranged from 1-tetradecanol (C14) to 1-dotriacontanol (C32); the acid moiety ranged from lauric acid (C12) to n-dotriacontanoic acid (C32) plus numerous iso- (from C13 to C28) and anteiso(C13 to C18 plus C20) isomers of several saturated aliphatic acids. Since each ester reported by Rodgman et al. was found in tobacco and smoke (3294), logic dictates that each new tobacco ester found by Arrendale et al. is also present in smoke (103). Thus, the findings by Arrendale et al. substantially increased both the number of known components in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Most of the studies reported in the literature from the mid-1950s to the late 1970s to early 1980s on tobacco smoke composition dealt with the composition of the MSS from the cigarette. Gradually during the late 1970s, more and more studies were reported describing the composition of cigarette SSS [see Klus and Kuhn (2142)]. Presently, the major emphasis on tobacco smoke composition involves the composition of ETS, health problems reportedly associated with passive smoking, that is, exposure to ETS, and the levels of specific components reported to be associated with these health problems [Ecobichon and Wu (1108a), Environmental Protection Agency (1148, 1148a, 1148b), Guerin et al. (1445)]. SSS and ETS are discussed in later sections. Because of the relative efforts expended on cigarette MSS, cigarette SSS, and ETS, the numbers of identified components in each of these smokes were reported as approximately 4800, 500, and 100, respectively (3255). Given sufficient time and effort, any component identified in MSS could eventually be identified in SSS and ETS.
The approximate (and general) composition of cigarette MSS is well defined. An 85-mm cellulose acetate filtertipped commercial cigarette (65-mm tobacco rod, 20-mm filter tip) whose filler, a typical American blend of tobaccos, weighed approximately 1000 mg was machine smoked with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)-prescribed smoking parameters (35-ml puff volume, 2-sec puff duration, 1 puff/min; 25°C; 60% relative humidity; FTC-specified butt length) (1177b). This cigarette gave approximately 500 mg of total MSS. To separate the tobacco smoke aerosol into its two major phases, the particulate phase and the vapor phase, the smoke was passed through a Cambridge filter pad which retains more than 99.9% of the particulate phase, defined as total wet particulate matter (WTPM). The vapor phase is that portion of the smoke aerosol which passes through the Cambridge filter pad, and the major portion of its weight is due to the components of air drawn through the cigarette during the smoking process (nitrogen, oxygen, argon, etc.). The distribution and approximate composition of the total MSS emerging from this cigarette are summarized in Figure 0.4. The data in Figure 0.4 represent a consolidation of composition data from several sources, including data from RJRT R&D [Laurene (2299a)] plus data from Keith and Tesh (2068), Norman (2799a), and Browne et al. (445). To simplify the calculations throughout Figure 0.4, one value was deliberately adjusted slightly for convenience: the total MSS collected actually weighed slightly in excess of 497 mg, but the value 500 mg was used to calculate the percentages shown throughout Figure 0.4. In addition, no attempt was made with these data to define the degree of partition of some components between the particulate and the vapor phases. Because of their vapor pressure properties, significant quantities of some smoke components are found in both the particulate and vapor phases of cigarette MSS. These include hydrogen cyanide, several of the simple phenols (phenol, o-cresol, m-cresol, p-cresol), and several of the volatile N-nitrosamines. It is obvious from the data in Figure 0.4 that the particulate matter, whether described as WTPM, TPM, or FTC “tar,” comprises less than 5% (100 × 22.5/500 = 4.5%) of the total MSS emerging from the cigarette. This is true of nearly all commercial U. S. cigarettes no matter what the FTC “tar” yield. The composition of the MSS vapor phase has been almost completely defined. It is estimated that components representing less than 1 mg of the particulate phase (5.1% of the FTC “tar,” less than 0.2% of the total MSS) remain unidentified. If the number of unidentified components is as high (as many as 100000) as some investigators estimate (1422, 4103), then the level of each unidentified component must average in the low nanogram range. The extremely wide variations in the yields of components delivered in the MSS during the smoking of a cigarette have presented unique challenges to those involved not only in the identification of smoke components but also in their quantitation. Table 0.7 is a minor modification of the initial version presented in 1996 by Green and Rodgman (1373). In it, the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 44
11/24/08 3:16:44 PM
93-
TOTAL MAINSTREAM SMOKE
WET TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER (WTPM) 93+ ,.
93+ ,
VAPOR PHASE
93+ ,.
*-?1=
93+ ,.F G/
*-?1=0
"5/;?5:1
93+ ,.F G/
"5?=;31:
H'-=J
93+ ,.F G/
93+ ,.
#CD31:
93+ ,.
-=.;:05;C501
93+ ,.
-=.;:9;:;C501
93+ ,.
=3;: 4185@9 "1;: 4D0=;31:
93+ ,.
Hother componentsJ
93+ ,.
8/;4;8>1
93+ ,2
D0=;/-=.;:>
/50>
8014D01>
8014D01>-:071?;:1>
93+ ,2 93+ ,2
!5>/188-:1;@>
93+ ,2
"5?=581>
93+ ,3
87-:1>
93+ ,2
!5>/188-:1;@>
93+ ,3
'1=<1:;504D0=;/-=.;:>
93+ ,2
1?1=;/D/85/>
93+ ,3
&9;71<5391:?
93+ ,2
8/;4;8>
93+ ,3
87-8;5001=5A-?5A1>
93+ ,2
/50>
93+ ,3
>?1=>4
93+ ,2
>?1=>
93+ ,3
$41:;8>
93+ ,2
(:501:?5I106 ';?-8B1534?
93+ ,2
71?;:1>
93
93+ ,3 93+ ,3
';?-8B1534? 93
Note:1<=;<1=?51>;2?41/53-=1??1>?@0510B1=1->2;88;B>99I8?1=10/53-=1??199 ?;.-//;=;0 99?=5-/1?5:<8->?5/5E10/188@8;>1-/1?-?1I8?1=?5</->10/;991=/5-891=5/-:.81:0 - ?5>:;B1>?59-?10?4-?;A1=/;9<;:1:?>4-A1.11:501:?5I105:!&&2=;9?;.-//;/53-=1??1> &;91/;9<;:1:?>>@/4 ->B-?1= ?41>59<81<41:;8> 4D0=;31:/D-:501 -:0?41A;8-?581N:5?=;>-95:1>-=12;@:05:.;?4?41A-<;=-:0<-=?5/@8-?1 <4->1>;2/53-=1??1!&& 1:/1?41?;?-8;2?41:@9.1=5:?41?B;<4->1>-<<1-=>?;1C/110?41:@9.1=5:?41B4;81 .)-8@15:.=-/71?>=1<=1>1:?><1=/1:?;2';?-8!-5:>?=1-9&9;71B1534? 93 /)-8@15:<-=1:?41>1>=1<=1>1:?><1=/1:?;2*'$! 93 0!@/4;2?45>B-?1=5>/;:?=5.@?10.D?41-5=0=-B:?4=;@34?41/53-=1??10@=5:3<@:398<@ >1/0@=-?5;: <@ 95:
?;?-8<@>5:-8-.;=-?;=DB4;>1-?9;><41=15>/;:?=;8810?;?41><1/5I/-?5;:><=;<;>10.D?41':-918D
?19<1=-?@=1 =18-?5A14@9505?D% 15>/8->>;2/;9<;@:0>5:/8@01>-00104@91/?-:?>38D/1=;8 <=;21==102=;9?41?;.-//;=;0?;?41!&& 1?=-:>21==104@91/?-:?>/;:>?5?@?1-.;@??;;2?41'H?-=J 2)-8@15:.=-/71?>=1<=1>1:?><1=/1:?;2'H?-=JB1534? 93 3)-8@15:.=-/71?>=1<=1>1:?><1=/1:?;2H#?41=;9<;:1:?>JB1534? 93 45>/8->>;2/;9<;@:0>5:/8@01>?=-:>21=?;>9;71;2>;91?=5-/1?5:-0010?;?41I8?1=?5<<8@>5?>013=-0-?5;:<=;0@/?> 9;:;-:005-/1?5: 51=14-A1.11:A-=5;@>1>?59-?1>;2?41:@9.1=;2@:501:?5I10/;9<;:1:?><=1>1:?5:1C?=1918D>9-88-9;@:?>5:?41' H?-=J &1A1=-85:A1>?53-?;=>4-A11>?59-?10?41:@9.1=;2@:501:?5I10/;9<;:1:?>?;=-:312=;9IA1?;?B1:?D?591>?41 :@9.1=;2501:?5I10/;9<;:1:?> 5 1 2=;9-.;@??;
FIGURE 0.4 Approximate composition of cigarette mainstream smoke.
logarithmic presentation is a more concise depiction of this wide variation in the levels of selected smoke components. For most of the components shown in Table 0.7, there obviously is a range of values, and the extent of the range for each component is dependent on the cigarette type under study (filtered, nonfiltered) and the weight of tobacco consumed during the smoking of the cigarette for the analysis. In general, the locations of the various components on the logarithmic plot have been adjusted for a cigarette yielding about 18 to 20 mg/cigarette of FTC “tar.” If the design of the cigarette has been modified to reduce FTC “tar” yield, diminution of the yields of the other components will occur but not necessarily to the same extent as the decrease in FTC “tar” yield. Cigarette design parameters (tobacco rod length and dimensions, filter type and dimensions, filter-tip additives, tobacco blend and weight, processed tobaccos [reconstituted tobacco sheet, expanded tobacco], paper and paper additives, and air dilution [paper porosity and filter perforation]) have profound effects on cigarette MSS yield and
composition. Also shown in Table 0.7 are those components listed by Hoffmann and colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744) as “tumorigenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke” and cited as such by the U.S. Surgeon General (4012), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1148a), and the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2825). The validity and meaning of their classification of specific tobacco smoke components as tumorigenic were discussed by Rodgman (3265). Yields for the vapor-phase components range from a high of 50 to 60 mg/cigarette for carbon dioxide to lows in the nanogram range for vinyl chloride and the volatile nitrosamines such as N-nitrosoethylmethylamine. The major portion of the nitrogen (>300 mg/cigarette) and oxygen (>65 mg/ cigarette) in MSS is derived from the air drawn through the cigarette during the smoking process. The number of components identified in various tobacco types also increased substantially during the 1950s, 1960s,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 45
11/24/08 3:16:45 PM
TABLE 0.7 Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Components - Logarithmic Listing of Per Cigarette Yields Vapor Phase
Yield/cig
Nitrogen
Oxygen, carbon dioxide
Water, carbon monoxide
Acetaldehydea Isoprenee Limonene Nitric oxide
HCN
Acrolein 1,3-Butadienee
Formaldehydea 2-Furaldehyde Crotonaldehydea Benzenea Acrylonitrilea
¹ º »
-400 mg - 200 -100 mg -80 -40 -20 -10 mg -8 -4 -2 -1000 Og = 1 mg -800 -400 -200 -100 Mg -80 -40 -20 -10 Mg -8 -4 -2 -
Particulate Phase
ª « FTC “tar” ¬
Water
Humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol) Nicotine Total alkanes
The 5 acids: palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic
Saturated aliphatic esters Catechol
Solanesol Phytosterols
Total alkylpyridines
Phenol
Solanesyl esters
o-Cresol Phytyl esters
A-Tocopherol Solanesyl acetate
Indole Indole, 3-methylAnabasine
NABa,b; indole, 3-ethyl-; NNNa,b; quinolinea
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 46
11/24/08 3:16:46 PM
TABLE 0.7 (CONTINUED) Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Components - Logarithmic Listing of Per Cigarette Yields Vapor Phase
Yield/cig
Particulate Phase
NDEAa,b
- 1 Mg = 1000 ng - 1000 ng - 800 - 400 - 200 - 100 ng - 80 - 40 -
Hydrazinea
- 20
Arsenica
1-Naphthylamine
Ethyl carbamatea
- 10 ng - 8 -
Chromiuma
2-Naphthylaminea
Propane, 2-nitro-a
NDMAa,b
NPYRa,b
NEMAa,b Vinyl chloridea
-
Nornicotine
Indole, dimethylNNKa,b AACe
A- and B-Duvanediols A-Levantenolide
Indole, trimethyl-, Carbazole
Anthracene Pyrene; chrysenea Fluoranthene Benz[a]anthracenea
Leada, cadmiuma B-Levantenolide MeAACe; PhIPe Carbazole, 2,9dimethylCarbazole, 3,9dimethyl-
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene,c Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrenePyrenea; benzo[a]pyrenea ; Benzo[j]fluoranthene a Carbazole, 1,9dimethyl-
4
- 2 - 1000 pg = 1 ng - 800 - 400 - 200 - 100 pg - 80
Carbazole, 9-ethyl-; Carbazole, 4,9dimethylBiphenyl, 4-amino-a
Dibenz[a,h]anthracenea; Dibenzo[rst]pentaphenea,d Dibenz[a,j]acridinea Glu-P-1e & P-2e Trp-P-2e MeIQ Dibenzo[c,g]carbazolea
Chrysene, 5- methyl-a
IQe Trp-P-1e
Dibenz[a,h]acridinea
a
This tobacco smoke component was included in a list published by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) in which the component was one of 43 components defined as a “tumorigenic agent in tobacco and tobacco smoke.” b NDEA = N-nitrosodiethylamine NDMA = N-nitrosodimethylamine NEMA = N-nitrosoethylmethylamine NPYR = N-nitrosopyrrolidine NAB = N’-nitrosoanabasine NNK = 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone NNN = N’-nitrosonornicotine (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 47
11/24/08 3:16:46 PM
TABLE 0.7 (CONTINUED) Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Components - Logarithmic Listing of Per Cigarette Yields c
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene is the currently accepted name for benzo[b]fluoranthene. Benzo[rst]pentaphene is the currently accepted name for dibenzo[a,i]pyrene. e In a modified list of “tumorigenic agent in tobacco and tobacco smoke,” Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) increased the number of components from 43 to 60 and included several of the “cooked food” mutagens as well a several other MSS components (1,3-butadiene, isoprene, etc.). Trp-P-1 = 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole Trp-P-2 = 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole Glu-P-1 = 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole Glu-P-2 = 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole AAC = 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole MeAAC = 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole IQ = 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-b]quinoline PhIP = 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine d
and 1970s both within and outside the tobacco industry. The purpose of such studies was essentially twofold: to define the tobacco components that (1) provided taste and aroma to the smoke to render it acceptable to the consumer and (2) were precursors of the smoke components asserted to be responsible for the health problems induced by tobacco smoke. Participating investigators over the years included USDA personnel initially under the leadership of Stedman in Philadelphia and subsequently by Chortyk after the move of the USDA tobacco research group from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to Athens, Georgia. The precursor research will be discussed in much greater detail in subsequent chapters dealing with those precursors in tobacco of MSS components considered adverse to the smoker, for example, the precursors in tobacco of the PAHs, the phenols, aldehydes and ketones, the N-nitrosamines, and the N-heterocyclic amines. It is interesting to note that even the precursor studies led to differences of opinion among the scientists with views on the health problems associated with components in cigarette MSS. In 1942, Roffo (3327) proposed that the precursors of PAHs in the destructive distillate of tobacco were the tobacco phytosterols. In 1957, Fieser commented that the major precursor in tobacco of PAHs in MSS was probably cellulose (1181). Coauthors of several presentations and publications, Wynder, Wright, and Lam differed in their views on the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in tobacco smoke. Because of his research findings from 1955 to 1959, Lam was a proponent of the concept that the longchained aliphatic hydrocarbons were the major precursors in tobacco of the PAHs, including B[a]P, in MSS (2255–2258). Wynder was a proponent of the concept that the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in MSS were the long-chained aliphatic hydrocarbons and the phytosterols (4354).* Wright, a colleague of Wynder from the early to the late 1950s, held a different view from that of Wynder and that of Lam. Wright *
Even though this article was co-authored by Wynder and Wright, the view held by Wright on the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in smoke was omitted from the manuscript by Wynder.
considered the major precursors of PAHs in MSS to be the phytosterols and long-chained terpenoids such as solanesol (4282). Eventually, precursor studies by Rodgman and Cook (3269) in 1958 indicated that the view held by Wright was the correct one. Their 1958 findings were subsequently confirmed in the late 1970s at the USDA by Severson et al. (3616). There were significant contributions by Rowland et al. in the early 1950s from their studies on the composition of flue-cured tobacco, studies that resulted in the isolation and identification by classical chemical means of the 45-carbon terpenoid alcohol solanesol (3359), its acetate and several other of its esters (3294, 3296, 3358), neophytadiene (3345), A-tocopherol and solanachromene (3347), the four isomeric 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ones (the megastigmatrienones) (3355), and several cyclotetradecanediols (3220, 3221, 3351, 3360) plus their oxabicyclo derivatives (3361). Over a decade later, with more advanced analytical technology, Lloyd et al. (2389) identified several hundred previously unidentified flue-cured tobacco components. From their early composition studies, similar to those of Rowland on flue-cured tobacco, Schumacher and Vestal isolated and identified numerous previously unidentified Oriental tobacco components (3561), including sclareolide (3533) and the first glucose tetraester (3535). Schumacher also defined numerous components in Maryland tobacco (3550). Roberts and Rohde, in their study of the composition of burley tobacco, identified numerous previously unidentified tobacco burley components, including several cyclotetradecanediols (3219). As analytical methodology advanced after the 1950s, the number of identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components escalated dramatically. In addition to its study of tobacco smoke by Arnap (91–94) and Enzell et al. (1153, 1154), the R&D staff at the Swedish Tobacco Company published nearly one hundred articles on the composition of tobacco, primarily Oriental tobacco. The many Swedish Tobacco Company investigators included Aasen, Almqvist, Behr, Enzell, Hlubucek, Kimland, Nishida, and Wahlberg, all of whom coauthored many articles on tobacco composition (1–13, 52,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 48
11/24/08 3:16:46 PM
53, 84, 91–94, 227, 229–236, 1149–1157a, 1205a, 1660–1662, 2092–2095, 3315, 4083–4102). Excellent detailed summaries of the identification of hundreds of tobacco components and their generation from various terpenoid structures such as the noncyclic and cyclic carotenoids and the cyclotetradecane derivatives were presented and published in the late 1970s and early 1980s by Enzell (1149, 1150), Enzell and Wahlberg (1156), and Wahlberg and Enzell (4089, 4090). In the 1960s and 1970s, the Demoles and their colleagues at Firmenich SA in Switzerland also studied the composition of flue-cured, burley, and Oriental tobaccos and characterized many previously unreported compounds in each, for example, the studies by Demole and colleagues on burley tobacco composition (936–944), on flue-cured tobacco composition (945, 946, 948), and on Oriental tobacco composition (947). As noted previously, it was estimated by Wakeham (4103) and Grob (1422) from their examination of gas chromatograms that the number of components in tobacco smoke far exceeded the number of identified components. A similar situation exists with the composition of tobaccos. As early as the mid-1970s, DeJong and Lam (922d) commented that the estimated number of enzymes in green leaves, including tobacco, ranged from 1000 to 10000. Our Master Catalog from which the various lists of component classes are derived
comprises nearly 8400 components. The chapter on enzymes will list many of the tobacco enzymes but obviously will not include all of the great number of enzymes reported in tobacco. The MSS yields for components of the particulate phase range from that of FTC “tar” itself, shown as a yield of about 20 mg/cigarette in Table 0.7 (1373), to that of dibenz[a,h]acridine at an MSS yield of 0.1 ng/cigarette (100 pg/cigarette).* The magnitude of the range of yields for cigarette MSS components is demonstrated by the following: The ratio of the per cigarette yield of nitrogen (the most plentiful MSS component shown in Table 0.7) to that of dibenz[a,h]acridine (the lowest yield shown) is >3 × 10 9, that is, >300 mg vs. 0.1 ng). The need for analytical methodology to determine smoke components from the high milligram to the low picogram yield was one of the driving forces behind many of the developments and improvements in analytical technology for the study of complex mixtures.
*
Several new entries concerning N-heterocyclic amine data that were not available in 1996 for inclusion by Green and Rodgman (1373) are included in Table 0.7.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 49
11/24/08 3:16:46 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Components Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke The index was created for two purposes. The first was to capture in one site all the basic information on the identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components discussed in the chapters of the book. The components are listed alphabetically in the index. Second, the index may permit the reader to easily retrieve or search for information on a specific tobacco and/or smoke component or class of components so that further study will be facilitated. To achieve these goals, the index was constructed to include the following: (1) The CAS No. for many of the components, (2) an indication of the component identification in tobacco, tobacco smoke, or both, (3) the structure of many of the components, (4) the table number and chapter in which the component is not only referenced but its properties are described, particularly if they are considered adverse, (5) for multifunctional components, several chapters and table numbers are cited. Additionally, the publishers have provided the index on CD. Hopefully, the searchable format of the CD will aid the reader in retrieving any desired information. The index comprises almost 8700 components completely or partially identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. It not only includes over 8400 identified components but also several hundred compounds not identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke but reported by Doull et al. (1053) as tobacco ingredients used in the United States and by Baker et al. (172a, 174b) as tobacco ingredients used outside the United States, as well as in a summary by Rodgman (3266) and in our Chapter 24. Because the transfer from a tobacco product to smoke of very few of the added ingredients has been examined, they primarily are listed as tobacco components. Exceptions include several humectants used in tobacco products for many years. However, it should be noted that the detailed pyrolysis study by Baker and Bishop (172a) indicated that many such added ingredients would transfer in part to MSS during the tobacco smoking process. In some instances, the reader may wonder about the peculiar nature of the component listing. For example, a tobacco smoke component initially reported as 2-butene was later shown to be present in the smoke as cis- and trans-2-butene. Thus, three items are listed in the index for 2-butene, namely,
2-butene (CAS No. 107-10-7), 2-butene, (Z)- (CAS No. 59018-1), and 2-butene, (E)- (CAS No. 624-64-6). References to the identification of each are provided in Chapter 1, Section I.B. 2-Butenedioic acid is similarly listed: 2-butenedioic acid (CAS No. 6915-18-0), 2-butenedioic acid, (Z)- (maleic acid) (CAS No. 110-16-7), 2-butenedioic acid, (E)- (fumaric acid) (CAS No. 110-17-8). The reader will also find in the index certain broad classifications of components, like oxidases and free radicals. These and similar examples in the index are not there to confuse the reader, as many of the individual components in the broad classifications have specific CAS numbers. Generally, the references associated with these classes of components (found within the chapters noted in the index) will provide the reader with information of a common nature. In nearly all cases, individual components such as ascorbate oxidase, choline oxidase, cytochrome oxidase, and glycolate oxidase follow after the broadly classified component, oxidase. Likewise, specific free radicals such as methyl-acyl radical, ethyl-acyl radical, and propyl-acyl radical {2 isomers} may be found in the index. For some components in the index, several partially identified isomers exist, their number noted, and included in the total number of components identified in tobacco and/or smoke. Although the number of enzymes, genes, and nucleotides listed in the index is fewer than 500, their known number, as noted in Chapter 22, exceeds many thousands. The paltry number of enzymes, genes, and nucleotides listed in Chapter 22, Table XXII-2, was never intended to represent the total biological agents operating in the plant. Those selected for inclusion were from texts, research manuscripts, and patents where active research was conducted in the past in attempts to better understand the physiology and biochemistry of tobacco. As future genetic research develops, it is envisioned that the identity and function of hundreds of thousands of additional chemicals will be published. The authors hope that the format of the index and accompanying CD will help the reader to reach a better understanding of the components of tobacco and tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C000.indd 51
11/24/08 3:16:46 PM
1
The Hydrocarbons
I.A THE ALKANES In his catalog of tobacco smoke components reported in early 1954, Kosak (2170) listed hentriacontane as the only alkane identified in tobacco smoke. Subsequently, numerous investigations resulted in the identification of a great number of alkanes in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Over 120 alkanes, ranging from the C1 hydrocarbon methane to the C36 hydrocarbon hexatriacontane, have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Many of the higher molecular weight alkanes have been reported to be present in three isomeric forms, that is, the normal, the iso (2-methyl-), and the anteiso (3-methyl-) isomer: n-alkane iso-alkane anteiso-alkane
H3C-(CH2)n-CH3 H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)n-1-CH3 H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)n-2-CH3
In 1958, Barbezat-Debreuil (181), using column chromatography and x-ray analysis to examine the alkanes in tobacco and tobacco smoke, reported her identification of branched isomers in the alkane fraction from both sources. The next year, Carruthers and Johnstone (613) reported the results of their study on the long-chained alkanes in tobacco and the smoke from cigarettes containing it. Their analyses involved gasliquid chromatography and mass spectroscopy. They also noted that the minor differences between the mass spectroscopic data for tobacco and smoke were not significant because, at that time, the precision of such an analysis was not high. Their findings are summarized in Tables I.A-1 and I.A-2. Cuzin et al. (883) in their study of Gauloise cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) reported that 1.2% of the total particulate matter (TPM) consisted of n-C25, n-C26, n-C28, n-C29, n-C30, n-C31, and n-C32 alkanes and 75% of this weight involved the C30, C31, and C32 compounds. They reported that their evidence indicated no n-alkane higher than the n-C32 alkane was present. However, in 1960 Kosak and Swinehart (2176) reported the presence in cigarette MSS of the n-alkanes from C22 to C36 and branched alkanes from C21 to C32. Table I.A-3 summarizes their findings. Possibly due to the status of analytical methodology at the time, Dymicky and Stedman (1081) had earlier suggested the possible presence of n-tetracontane (C40H82) in tobacco but their finding has never been confirmed. In 1967, Ivanov and Ognyanov (1893b) reported the isolation of a crystalline alkane mixture, m.p. 62–64°C, which they proposed might contain a series of alkanes from C25 to C40. Carugno (619) reported the C31 alkanes to be the most abundant in tobacco but also noted that the C27, C29, C30, C32, and C33 homologs were present in appreciable amounts. Only a small portion of the alkanes in the alkane fraction from the
MSS from four tobacco types and a commercial tobacco blend was found with carbon chain lengths equal to or less than C24; only trace amounts of alkanes at or below n-hexadecane were found by Spears et al. (3768). They also reported that nearly 48% of an alkene-free alkane fraction (0.75 mg/cig) from MSS consisted of n-hentriacontane (0.182 mg/cig), n-dotriacontane (0.108 mg/cig), and n-tritriacontane (0.069 mg/cig). In their article on the pyrolysis of tobacco constituents, Badger et al. (142) reproduced a gas chromatogram provided by Reid on the alkanes in a tobacco sample. The peaks for the alkanes from C23 to C33 are readily discernible in the chromatogram. Badger et al. estimated that the tobacco alkane fraction amounted to 0.32% of the tobacco weight. Based on their pyrolysis studies, Badger et al. also proposed an elaborate mechanism for the formation of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). It involved the degradation of the alkanes to smaller fragments, followed by recombination of the fragments into substituted cyclic entities and their aromatization. As listed in Table I.A-4, adapted from Mold et al. (2595), about 25% to 50% of the total alkanes in tobacco comprise nearly equal amounts of the iso and anteiso isomers of the alkanes. In the series of normal- and iso-alkanes, the homologs with odd-numbered carbons predominate, with the C31 and C33 homologs being present in the largest amounts. In the anteiso-alkanes, the alkanes with even-numbered carbons predominate, with the C32 homolog being present in the largest amount. The data provided by Mold et al. (2595) were reproduced by Tso in his 1990 book (3973). As Stedman (3797) noted in his 1968 review of the composition of tobacco and smoke, it was thought at one time that anteiso-alkanes comprised only those homologs with evennumbered carbons, but eventually homologs with odd-numbered carbons were reported by Carugno and Rossi (625) and Chortyk et al. (727). Carugno and Rossi (625) reported the presence of both normal and branched C21 to C34 alkanes in cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). In a later comparison of the composition of the alkane fraction in a reference tobacco (University of Kentucky 1R1) and its cigarette MSS, Chortyk et al. (727) reported that “the ratio among the constituents in leaf paraffins is almost identical [with] the ratio among the smoke paraffins.” It is possible, however, that changes in agronomic practices over the years since the 1970s may have resulted in tobaccos whose contents of alkanes and distribution among the alkane homologs are substantially different from those of the tobaccos studied in the 1960s and 1970s. This, of course, would also affect the content and distribution among the alkane homologs in the tobacco smoke. Table I.A-5 summarizes the tobacco smoke alkane isomers described by Stedman (3797) and those known to be 1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 1
11/13/08 6:40:25 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2
TABLE I.A-1 Relative Percentage Composition of Tobacco Alkanes in Tobacco and Cigarette Smoke, Based on Mass Spectroscopic Analysis (613) Tobacco No. of Carbons 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Total
iso-
Total
n-
iso-
Total
0.9 0.6 3.0 0.1 6.6 0.9 24.1 3.9 10.8 50.9
0 0 0.9 0 15.9 2.5 24.4 2.4 3.3 49.3
0.9 0.6 3.9 0.1 22.5 3.4 48.5 6.3 14.1 100.3
0 0.5 5.2 0.5 5.2 1.0 25.7 4.3 14.3 56.7
0 0 0.8 0 15.3 1.5 20.2 1.9 3.5 43.2
0 0.5 6.0 0.5 20.5 2.5 45.9 6.2 17.8 99.9
TABLE I.A-2 Relative Percentage Composition of n-Alkanes in Tobacco and Cigarette Smoke, Based on Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Analysis (613) No. of Carbons n-24 n-25 n-26 n-27 n-28 n-29 n-30 n-31 n-32 n-33 n-34
Tobacco … 0.5 0.3 7.5 0.6 8.8 3.9 47.0 12.5 18.9 …
Cigarette Smoke 0.1 0.6 0.4 6.3 1.1 7.4 3.8 48.4 13.0 22.8 1.1
TABLE I.A-3 Alkane Content of Cigarette Mainstream Smoke (2176) No. of Carbons 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 % of Total
Normal … 0.11 0.49 0.92 2.50 1.40 6.60 1.80 6.30 3.30 22.90 4.80 9.70 1.20 0.97 0.05 63.0
Cigarette Smoke
n-
Branched 0.16 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.16 1.63 0.87 13.90 2.31 15.33 0.90 1.13 … … … … 37.0
present in 1992. The number of identified alkanes in these three isomeric forms was almost doubled during the period 1968 to 1992. Many of the isomeric C8 through C36 alkanes have been identified in the organic solvent-soluble extracts from one or more of the major tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Oriental, Maryland). Their presence in tobacco smoke is the result of their volatilization during the puff and smolder phases of the smoking process and subsequent direct transfer from the tobacco to its MSS and sidestream smoke (SSS). The bulk of these higher alkanes are found in the particulate phase of the smoke aerosol with traces of the lower ones (C8-C12) in the vapor phase. The lower molecular weight alkanes (C1 through C7) are found predominately in the vapor phase of the MSS and SSS aerosols, and are readily separated and identified by a variety of analytical techniques. In general, the n-alkanes from C1 to C4 are gases, those from C5 to C16 are liquids, and those above C17 are solids. The melting points and boiling points of some of the solid alkanes in tobacco and smoke are summarized in Table I.A-6. As a result of the successful induction in the mid-1950s of carcinomas on the skin of mice painted repeatedly with concentrated solutions of CSC (4306a), the search for the causative agent in the condensate began. The demonstration in the early 1930s of the tumorigenicity of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) (2078) and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) (796a, 797) to mouse skin triggered an enormous research effort between 1932 and 1953, excluding the World War II years, which involved the synthesis of hundreds of PAHs and their testing for tumorigenicity. Because many of them were found to be tumorigenic to mouse skin, particularly those tetracyclic and higher, the PAHs were proposed in the mid-1950s by many investigators as possible causative agents for the lung cancer type (squamous cell carcinoma) observed in cigarette smokers. This proposal led to the demonstration of the presence of numerous PAHs in CSC, determination of their levels, and studies to elucidate their precursors in the tobacco.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 2
11/13/08 6:40:27 PM
The Hydrocarbons
3
TABLE I.A-4 Relative Percentage Composition of Tobacco Alkanes Based on Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Data [Figures rounded from those provided by Mold et al. (2595)] Commercial Tobacco Blend No. of Carbons 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
Flue-Cured Tobacco
Burley Tobacco
Oriental Tobacco
n-
iso-
ante-
n-
iso-
ante-
n-
iso-
ante-
n-
iso-
ante-
1.7 0.8 7.7 0.9 6.7 3.2 26.3 4.9 10.8 —
— — — — 1.2 — 10.9 — 5.6 —
— — — 0.1 — 5.6 — 13.0 — 1.2
2.0 1.0 5.7 1.4 5.9 3.1 24.5 4.2 7.2 —
— — — — 3.1 — 14.3 — 6.4 —
— — — 0.4 — 6.7 — 11.3 — 2.9
1.15 0.5 4.8 1.1 5.4 2.9 27.5 5.6 8.1 —
— — — — 2.5 — 12.6 — 6.5 —
— — — 0.4 — 6.8 — 11.7 — 2.6
1.4 0.7 8.6 1.8 7.9 5.5 23.2 7.4 12.8 —
— — — — 1.8 — 6.7 — 4.9 —
— — — 0.2 — 5.3 — 8.9 — 2.3
TABLE I.A-5 Alkane Isomers Identified in Cigarette Mainstream Tobacco Smoke, 1968 vs. 1992 1968a
1992
Carbon Number
a
Carbon Number
normal
iso
anteiso
normal
iso
anteiso
C1-C9 C12-C36 … … …
C4-C6 C27-C33 … … …
C6 … … … …
C1-C36 … … … …
C4-C6 C8-C9 C11-C13 C16-C18 C21-C36
C6-C8 C11-C12 C16-C18 C21-C36 …
From Stedman (3797).
Despite the fact that in 1942 the phytosterols in tobacco had been proposed by Roffo (3327) as the precursors in tobacco of PAHs in a “destructive distillate” of tobacco, the tobacco phytosterols were essentially ignored in the early 1950s. Because of the research results described by Lam (2255–2258) on the pyrogenesis of PAHs from alkanes, the high molecular weight alkanes in tobacco
were proposed as the precursors of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. Roffo’s suggestion on phytosterols was discounted by Wynder and Hoffmann (4320, 4322) because his research did not involve tobacco smoke but involved the composition and specific tumorigenicity of “destructive distillates” from control and organic solvent-extracted tobacco.
TABLE I.A-6 Melting Point and Boiling Point Data for n-Alkanes n-Alkane Undecane Dodecane Tridecane Tetradecane Pentadecane Hexadecane Heptadecane Octadecane Nonadecane Eicosane
Formula C11H24 C12H26 C13H26 C14H30 C15H32 C16H34 C17H36 C18H38 C19H40 C20H42
m.p. °C
b.p. °C
25.6
9.6
6 5.5 10 18.1 22.0 28.0 32.0 36.4
196 216 230 251 268 280 303 308 330 343
n-Alkane Heneicosane Docosane Tricosane Tetracosane Pentacosane Triacontane Pentatriacontane Hexatriacontane Tetracontane Pentacontane
Formula
m.p. °C
b.p. °C
C21H44 C22H46 C23H48 C24H50 C25H52 C30H62 C35H72 C36H74 C40H82 C50H102
40.4 44.4 47.4 51.1 53.3 66.0 74.6 75 81.0 92
357 369 380 391 402 450
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 3
11/13/08 6:40:28 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4
TABLE I.A-7 Chronology of Studies on Alkanes in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Selected Studies Of Year
Alkanesa in Tobacco
1901 1930 1934 1934, 1937 1935 1936 1941 1942 1954 1955, 1956 1956 1956 1956 1956, 1957
Thorpe and Holmes (3914) Kurilo (2239, 2240) Chibnall et al. (701)
1956, 1957 1957 1957 1958 1958 1958 1958 1958 1958, 1959 1959 1959 1959, 1960 1960 1961 1962 1962, 1963 1964, 1967 1965, 1966 1966, 1967 1967 1968 1968 1970 1974, 1975 1978 1979 1989 2003 a
Schürch and Winterstein (3562) Brückner (450) Palfray et al. (2890) Hukusima and Oike (1848)
Alkanes in Tobacco Smoke
Alkanes as Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Precursors
Wenusch (4184, 4192, 4194) Schürch and Winterstein (3562)
Kosak (2170) Lam (2255–2257)
Lam (2255–2257) Dickey and Touey (966)
Onishi and Yamasaki (2863) Wright and Wynder (4354)
Kosak (2172) Kosak et al. (2177) Wright and Wynder (4284) Wynder and Wright (4354) Rodgman (3240, 3242)
Rowland (3345) Clemo (767) Cuzin et al. (876) Rayburn and Wartman (3091) Rayburn et al. (3092) Rodgman and Cook (3269) Dymicky and Stedman (1081) Gladding and Wright (1308) Stedman and Rusaniwskyj, (3807, 3808)
Carugno (619) Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Ivanov and Ognyanov (1893, 1893a) Carugno and Rossi (625) Mokhnachev et al. (2583) Hoffmann and Wynder (1798)
Chortyk et al. (727)
Izawa et al. (1905) Clemo (765) Cuzin et al. (876) Trillat and Cuzin (3964) Van Duuren and Kosak (4030)
Rayburn and Wartman (3091) Rayburn et al. (3092) Rodgman and Cook (3269) Wynder et al. (4355, 4356)
Carruthers and Johnstone (613) Cuzin (877) Schepartz (3431) Kosak and Swinehart (2176) Izawa (1900) Carugno (619) Spears et al. (3768) Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Osman et al. (2875). Carugno and Rossi (625) Hoffmann and Wynder (1798)
Schepartz (3431)
Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Badger et al. (142) Mokhnachev et al. (2583) Hoffmann and Wynder (1798) Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3465)
Jenkins et al. (1935) Chortyk et al. (727) Severson et al. (3608)
Severson et al. (3616) Bass et al. (208) Coleman and Gordon (776)
Most of the studies dealt with alkanes C10 and greater.
Although Zeise (4406) and Kissling (2100, 2102) reported the isolation of alkane-like components from tobacco and tobacco smoke, Kosak (2170) in his catalog of smoke components classified their data as inconclusive. However, the
evidence provided by Thorpe and Holmes (3914) left little doubt as to the presence of the alkanes in tobacco leaf. The Thorpe-Holmes report was followed by numerous descriptions of the isolation of alkanes from tobacco and tobacco smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 4
11/13/08 6:40:29 PM
The Hydrocarbons
5
Table I.A-8 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Tobacco Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Pyrolyzed in Air at Various Temperatures Quantity (μg) of PAH Formed on Pyrolysis (in air) of Aliphatic Tobacco Hydrocarbons (1.0 g) At 800°C Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Naphthalene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Phenanthrene Anthracene Pyrene Fluoranthene Chrysene Perylene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[e]pyrene Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene TOTALS
At 700°C
At 600°C
PAH, µg/g
PAH/ B[a]P a
PAH, µg/g
PAH/ B[a]P a
PAH, µg/g
14260 0 3520 3840 580 960 1700 400 34 340 400 42 26076
41.94 [2/5]b 0 [3/5]c 10.35 [3/5]c 11.29 [3/5]c 1.71 [3/5]c 2.82 [4/5]d 5.00 [4/5]d 1.18 [4/5]d 0.10 [5/5]e 1.00 1.18 [5/5]e 0.12 [6/5]f 86.87
4760 0 480 580 110 320 24 86 4 30 80 <1 6474
158.7 0 16.00 19.33 3.67 10.67 0.80 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.67 <0.03 21.47
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene [2/5] = bicyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P c [3/5] = tricyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P d [4/5] = tetracyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P e [5/5] = pentacyclic/pentacyc lic B[a]P f [6/6] = hexacyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P a
b
(see Table I.A-7 for a cross section of some of the published reports, particularly those issued prior to the 1980s). Also included in Table I.A-7 are references to some of the studies in which the alkanes were investigated as PAH precursors by pyrolysis or by “spiking” of the tobacco filler in a cigarette. In 1934, Chibnall et al. (701) were among the first investigators to report that the alkane fraction, comprising a mixture of several individual alkanes, melted sharply over a narrow temperature range (63.3–63.8°C), a melting point behavior for a mixture that was contrary to the organic chemistry teachings of the day. From the results of studies on the pyrolysis of the “tobacco paraffins,” which comprise the n-, iso-, and anteiso-alkanes, it was suggested by Lam (2255–2258), Wynder et al. (4356), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), and Hoffmann and Wynder (1798) that these components were the major precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. However, in 1958, Rayburn and his colleagues (3091, 3092) challenged the proposal that the tobacco alkanes were the major precursors of the smoke PAHs, but their experimental data were not overly conclusive in support of their challenge. Nevertheless, it should be realized that in one sense Rayburn et al. were partly correct: as PAH precursors, the tobacco alkanes do contribute to the PAHs in tobacco smoke but their contribution is much less significant than other precursors (the phytosterols and terpenoids such as solanesol) in tobacco [cf. Wright (4282), Rodgman and Cook, (3269, 3286), Severson et al. (3616)]. Table I.A-8, adapted from Lam (2257), demonstrates the relationship between PAH generation and pyrolysis
temperature for aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons (the alkanes) pyrolyzed in air at several temperatures. Calculation of the yield ratios [PAH µg/g:B[a]P µg/g] of the other PAHs vs. B[a]P reveals significant information: in this simple case of pyrolysis, there is little consistency between the change in ratios of PAH/B[a]P as the temperature is increased from 700°C to 800°C. For example, in the case of the tetracyclic hydrocarbons, the PAH/B[a]P ratio decreases for pyrene and chrysene but increases for fluoranthene. For the pentacyclic hydrocarbons, the ratio decreases for both perylene and benzo[e] pyrene. For the hexacyclic hydrocarbon dibenzo[def,mno] chrysene, the ratio increases. These same trends exist whether the PAH/B[a]P ratios are calculated in terms of molar yields or, as in Table I.A-8, in terms of the absolute quantities (micrograms of PAH generated per gram of aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons pyrolyzed). The significance of these data and calculations is their demonstration in 1956 that in even the simplest pyrolysis situation,* B[a]P is not a valid “indicator” or “marker” for the PAHs with four or more rings and/or their *
For several decades, Wynder, Hoffmann, and some other investigators asserted that the fate of a given tobacco component during inert atmosphere pyrolysis was equivalent to its fate in the oxygen-deficient (but not oxygen-free) atmosphere in the tobacco rod during the cigarette smoking process [see Wynder and Hoffmann (4320, 4332), Hoffmann and Wynder (1798)]. At the same time, many other investigators maintained that the two processes were not equivalent. Hoffmann and colleagues demonstrated in 1979 with radiolabeled nicotine that the two processes were not equivalent, and they suggested that this nonequivalence observed for the fate of nicotine was applicable to the fate of other tobacco components (3512).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 5
11/13/08 6:40:29 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
6
supposed relationship to tumorigenic activity as suggested by Wynder and Hoffmann (4317, 4320, 4332). In addition to these data by Lam, other contrary data that demonstrated the invalidity of the concept of B[a]P as an “indicator” or “marker” for PAHs with four or more rings and the tumorigenicity of the substrate (CSC, pyrolysate, etc.) containing them were generated not only in studies by Wynder et al. (4355, 4356), but also in studies by Campbell and Lindsey (583), Rodgman (3240), Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3286), Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), the National Cancer Institute (2683), and Severson et al. (3616). When used as a solvent for B[a]P in mouse skin-painting tests, the C10, C12, or C16 n-alkanes—although noncarcinogenic per se in this bioassay—were reported by Horton et al. (1835) to accelerate the tumor-producing capability of B[a]P and 1,2dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene). Horton et al. reported that n-octane, the C8 alkane, did not exhibit this property. The acceleration finding of the C10, C12, or C16 n-alkanes was incorporated by Carruthers and Johnstone (613) into an explanation of why the percent of tumor-bearing animals (% TBAs) was much greater in mice painted with CSC than could be predicted by the levels of tumorigenic polycyclic hydrocarbons in the CSC. They extrapolated the finding of this property of the C10, C12, and C16 n-alkanes to the longer chained homologs in cigarette smoke. In contrast, however, to the findings of Horton et al. (1835), Wynder and Hoffmann (4314, 4319, 4332) reported that the specific tumorigenicity of B[a]P in mouse skin-painting experiments was significantly “inhibited” when it was administered with the individual alkanes n-hentriacontane (C31H64) or n-pentatriacontane (C35H72) and the ratio of the alkane: B[a]P was either 200:1 or 100:1. These ratios are much less than those encountered in CSC. Wynder and Hoffmann also reported that increasing the level of the alkane fraction in the applied CSC from 3% to 4% (a 33% increase) resulted in a decrease (from 40% to 24%) in the % TBAs after 19
months and a decrease (from 24% to 18%) of % TBAs with malignant tumors. Surprisingly, Wynder and Hoffmann did not consider these decreases significant! These alkane-B[a] P data, originally presented at an American Association for Cancer Research meeting (4314), did not appear in any journal but were included in the Wynder-Hoffmann review (4319) and book (4332) on tobacco smoke carcinogenesis. Although they did not catalog their bioassay findings from the alkane-B[a]P experiments in their extensive tabulation of the induction of carcinoma in skin-painting studies with tobacco products [see pp. 330–331 in (4319) and pp. 370–371 in (4332)], Wynder and Hoffmann offered the following explanation for the result observed: The effect of alkanes may not be inhibitory to tumorigenicity but rather a consequence of having influenced resorption. The tumor response data of these experiments clearly express a delay of tumor appearance, a result that we believe to be due to the retarding effect of the n-alkanes.
Earlier, Wynder and Wright (4354) had reported that the slight tumorigenicity observed with an alkane fraction of tobacco smoke condensate in a mouse skin-painting bioassay was due not to the alkanes per se but to trace amounts of PAHs in the alkane fraction. In later experiments with gasoline engine exhaust “tar” vs. CSC, the observed tumorigenicities observed by Wynder and Hoffmann (4315) did not parallel the levels of the PAHs considered to be the major contributors to the observed skin tumors. To explain the difference (and the less than anticipated tumorigenicity of the exhaust “tar”), the authors attributed the depressed tumorigenicity of the exhaust “tar” not only to alkanes but also to nontumorigenic PAHs present in engine exhaust “tar” at levels far in excess of those of the tumorigenic PAHs such as B[a]P and DB[a,h]A (see Table I.A-9). Although the ratios are not as great for CSC as for exhaust “tar,” it should be noted that the levels of nontumorigenic
TABLE I.A-9 Ratios for Individual Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Gasoline Engine Exhaust “Tar” (EET) and Cigarette Smoke Condensate (CSC) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
Ratio PAHEET:PAHCSC
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
Ratio PAHEET:PAHCSC
Benz[a]anthracene Benz[a]anthracene, alkylBenz[e]acephenanthryleneb Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene Benzo[j]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene 11H-Benzo[b]fluorene Benzo[ghi]perylene Chrysene Chrysene, alkyl- a Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
600:1 >10:1 640:1 1500:1 85-110:1 200-360:1 100:1 255-340:1 87-115:1 33-45:1 17-25:1
Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysenec Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene, alkylBenzo[e]pyrene Fluoranthene Fluoranthene, alkylIndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]fluoranthene Pyrene Pyrene, alkylTriphenylene
>440:1 45:1 >10:1 4200:1 275-390:1 230-275:1 >80:1 >30:1 500-700:1 3-4:1 4400:1
a
Similar to 5-methylchrysene Formerly known as benzo[b]fluoranthene c Formerly known as anthanthrene b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 6
11/13/08 6:40:30 PM
The Hydrocarbons
(and antitumorigenic) PAHs in CSC far exceed those of the tumorigenic PAHs. Wynder and Hoffmann (4315) summarized their findings as follows: It was anticipated that the … exhaust gas “tar” and nicotine would be many times more active than tobacco smoke condensate. However, … it is only approximately twice as active. This relatively small increase in biological activity of exhaust gas “tar” raises the question of possible anticarcinogenic factors that may be more prevalent in engine exhaust “tar” … one may theorize that some of the noncarcinogenic polynuclear hydrocarbons that are present in engine exhaust gas “tar” in far greater concentrations than in tobacco smoke condensate may interfere with the resorption of the “tar.” Some of the oily materials in gasoline engine exhaust “tar” and the paraffins in tobacco smoke condensate may also act as anticarcinogens.
In their comparison of the composition of the alkane fraction in a reference tobacco (University of Kentucky 1R1) and its cigarette MSS, Chortyk et al. (727) reported that “the ratio among the constituents in leaf paraffins is almost identical [with] the ratio among the smoke paraffins.” They interpreted this finding as suggesting the paraffins undergo little pyrolytic degradation during the smoking process. Although octatriacontane has not been identified in either tobacco or tobacco smoke, Bass et al. (208) employed [18-14C]octatriacontane to study its transfer to cigarette smoke. Their findings with this alkane agreed with those of Chortyk et al. (727) on the series of alkanes in tobacco and their transfer to smoke and with those of Jenkins et al. (1935) on the transfer of [16,17-14C] dotriacontane from tobacco to smoke. Table I.A-10 lists the alkanes identified in mainstream tobacco smoke. The citations do not necessarily include every reference to the identification or discussion of a particular alkane.
I.B THE ALKENES AND ALKYNES In his summary of the identified components of tobacco smoke, Kosak (2170) listed only one unequivocally identified alkene or alkyne. It was ethyne (acetylene). Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed the following alkenes and alkynes identified in tobacco smoke: cis- and trans-butene, 1,3-butadiene, methyl-1,3-butadiene (isoprene), ethene, ethyne, methylethyne, propene, methylpropene, squalene and isosqualene, and several phytadienes. Less than a decade later, Stedman (3797) described and/or discussed nearly 235 acyclic alkenes and alkynes identified in tobacco smoke. This number includes the cis and trans isomers in the homologous monoalkene series discussed below. In Table I.B-1 are listed the nearly 330 acyclic alkenes and alkynes in tobacco smoke whose identifications have been reported to date. The lower molecular weight acyclic unsaturated hydrocarbons (alkenes, alkadienes, alkynes, etc.) occur primarily, if not totally, in the vapor phase of mainstream smoke (MSS). Even though some of the vapor-phase components of cigarette MSS have been shown to be significant in vitro ciliastats, the low
7
molecular weight hydrocarbons (alkanes, alkenes, alkynes) were not considered by Caroff et al. (604, 605) to be involved because of their low concentrations in the smoke. The smoke components (aldehydes, ketones, hydrogen cyanide, formic and acetic acids, phenol) reported to be significant in vitro ciliastats are relatively highly water-soluble, whereas the low molecular weight hydrocarbons, generally considered non-ciliastatic in in vitro systems, show extremely low solubility in water. Rodgman et al. (3306) and Dalhamn et al. (892, 893) described the differences in oral absorption of the tobacco smoke components isoprene (20%) vs. acetaldehyde (60%) or acetone (56%). It has also been noted by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) that these compounds do not appear to play a significant role in tobacco smoke carcinogenesis: “Their [the alkenes] level in the smoke is rather low (0.01%) and they would, therefore, not be active even if they were tumor promoters.” In the National Cancer Institute study on the “less hazardous” cigarette, which involved chemical and biological (mouse skin-painting bioassay) studies on four series* (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333) of experimental cigarettes and appropriate controls, an interesting correlation was reported with the first series of cigarettes (1329): although no correlations were observed between the benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) content or the benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) content of the cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) and the percent of tumor-bearing animals (% TBA), a correlation— classified as significant—was observed between the isoprene content of the MSS and the % TBA. This observed isoprene-% TBA correlation was heatedly discussed and debated for the following year. In the second, third, and fourth series of cigarette, the isoprene-% TBA correlation was not observed, that is, it had disappeared! It should be noted that the manipulations involved in the collection and preparation of the CSCs for the bioassay virtually preclude the presence of isoprene in the material applied to the host animals. In its review of smoke composition and the relationship between smoke components and health, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC; 1870) devoted very little space to the volatile acyclic hydrocarbons and just two paragraphs to the nonvolatile members of this compound group. Among the alkenes listed as tobacco smoke components are several series of isomeric isoprenoid compounds, including the phytadienes (3247), the solanesenes (3297), and the squalenes (2175, 3297, 4033), plus several homologous series of monoalkenes (1144). A series of phytadiene isomers with a pair of conjugated double bonds in different internal and terminal positions were identified in the MSS from cigarettes containing the American blend (3247). Similar series of phytadienes were identified in the MSSs from cigarettes containing individual tobaccos (flue-cured, burley, Oriental). The evidence indicated the presence of at least the following four basic combinations of the conjugated linkages within an isoprenoid unit *
The four series of cigarettes involved a total of 98 test cigarettes and about 30 reference (Kentucky Reference 1R1) and standard cigarettes, divided almost equally among the four series.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 7
11/13/08 6:40:31 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
8
TABLE I.A-10 Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
)
!"!+!(!,
'!*!+)&&!-$/!( !1
)),')%!
)) ,.,-$-.-! ,')%!
))
!(! '!-#2&
!(! '!-#2&
.-(!
.-(! $'!-#2&
.-(!'!-#2&
.-(! '!-#2&
!(!
!(!'!-#2&
!(! '!-#2&
)),(!
)),(! '!-#2& )),(! '!-#2& ) !(!
) !(! '!-#2&
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 8
11/13/08 6:40:34 PM
The Hydrocarbons
9
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke (
! * ' +
& ) *(%% ,#. ' /
( ' & ,"0%
( ' ,*#& ,"0% (,*#(','
(,*#(',' & ,"0%
(,*#(',' & ,"0%
(,*#(',' #(+'
((+&($
(( +-+,#,-, +&($
((
#(+' & ,"0%
#(+' & ,"0%
#(+' & ,"0%
,"'
' #(+'
' #(+' & ,"0%
' #(+' & ,"0%
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 9
11/13/08 6:40:36 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
10
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke.
1561-00-8
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 10
11/13/08 6:40:38 PM
The Hydrocarbons
11
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &
'*%
'*% $* /# '**(!&%*%
.&)%
.&)% $* /#
.&)% $* /# .%
.% $* /# .% $* /#
.% **($* /# 0' /*%1
.%$!.*+(-!* '%*% .%
.%!$* /#
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
&&
'*% !$* /#
'*% * /#
&&)$&"
'*%!$* /#
'*% $* /#
(%)
$'(#*!,%.
.% !$* /#
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 11
11/13/08 6:40:41 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
12
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke )
!"!+!(!,
'!*!+)&&!-$/!( !0
)),')%!
)) ,.,-$-.-! ,')%!
))
!0(! $'!-#1&
!0(! '!-#1&
!0(! -!-+'!-#1&
!0-+$)(-(!
!-#(!
)(),(!
)(),(! '!-#1& )(),(! '!-#1&
)( !(!
)( !(!'!-#1&
)( !(! '!-#1&
)((!
)((! '!-#1&
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 12
11/13/08 6:40:43 PM
The Hydrocarbons
13
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke (
! * ' +
& ) *(%% ,#. ' /
((+&($
(( +-+,#,-, +&($
((
, ' & ,"0%
, ' & ,"0%
,'
,' #& ,"0%
',(+'
',(+' & ,"0%
',(+' & ,"0%
(',*#(','
,(+'
,(+' & ,"0%
,(+' & ,"0% , '
,' & ,"0%
,' & ,"0%
,,*#(','
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 13
11/13/08 6:40:45 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
14
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
)&* ''
'' *,*+"+,+ *%'#
&+& %+!/$
&+& ++)%+!/$ 0()"*+&1
&+& +)"%+!/$0&')()"*+&1
&+& %+!/$
&+& %+!/$
'
%()'$$+"-&.
&+&
&+& %+!/$
&+&
&+& "+!/$ &+& "%+!/$
&+&%+!/$
&++)"'&+&
&++)"'&+& %+!/$
&++)"'&+& %+!/$ )'(&
''*%'#
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 14
11/13/08 6:40:48 PM
The Hydrocarbons
15
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke '
)&*
%()'$$+"-&.
''*%'#
'' *,*+"+,+ *%'#
''
+)& %+!/$
+)& %+!/$
+)& +)"%+!/$
+)+)"'&+&
+)+)"'&+& %+!/$
+)+)"'&+& %+!/$
)'(& %+!/$
0"*',+&1
+)'&+&
+)'*&
+)'*&%+!/$ +)'*& %+!/$
+)'*& %+!/$
+)&
)"'&+&
)"'&+& %+!/$
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 15
11/13/08 6:40:50 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
16
TABLE I.A-10 (CONTINUED) Alkanes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke '
)&*
%()'$$+"-&.
'' *,*+"+,+ *%'#
''
)"& %+!/$
)"& %+!/$
)"+)"'&+& %+!/$
)"+)"'&+& %+!/$
''*%'#
)"'&+& %+!/$
)"'*&
)"'*& %+!/$ )"'*& %+!/$
)"&
)"+)"'&+&
&&
&&"%+!/$
&& "%+!/$
&& %+!/$
&& %+!/$
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 16
11/13/08 6:40:53 PM
The Hydrocarbons
17
TABLE I.B-1 Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 17
11/13/08 6:40:54 PM
18
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 18
11/13/08 6:40:55 PM
The Hydrocarbons
19
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 19
11/13/08 6:40:57 PM
20
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 20
11/13/08 6:41:05 PM
The Hydrocarbons
21
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 21
11/13/08 6:41:09 PM
22
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 22
11/13/08 6:41:12 PM
The Hydrocarbons
23
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 23
11/13/08 6:41:14 PM
24
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 24
11/13/08 6:41:17 PM
The Hydrocarbons
25
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 25
11/13/08 6:41:19 PM
26
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 26
11/13/08 6:41:21 PM
The Hydrocarbons
27
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 27
11/13/08 6:41:24 PM
28
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 28
11/13/08 6:41:27 PM
The Hydrocarbons
29
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 29
11/13/08 6:41:29 PM
30
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 30
11/13/08 6:41:32 PM
The Hydrocarbons
31
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 31
11/13/08 6:41:34 PM
32
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 32
11/13/08 6:41:37 PM
The Hydrocarbons
33
TABLE I.B-1 (CONTINUED) Alkenes and Alkynes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 33
11/13/08 6:41:39 PM
34
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Phytadienes I to IV with the potential to generate anthraquinonecarboxylic acids in the reaction sequence described are CH3 CH2 shown in Figure I.B-1. Phytadienes I, II (n = 3), and IV can { exist as cis and trans isomers. The remaining phytadienes in Figure I.B-1 can exist as cis cis, cis trans, trans cis, and trans -CH=C-CH=CH=CH-C-CH2-CH2trans isomers. In Figure I.B-2 are shown the phytadienes (V, CH3 CH2 VI) that do not appear to form Diels-Alder adducts. { As noted previously, even if they did form the Diels-Alder -CH2-C-CH=CH=CH-C=CH-CH2adducts, they would not yield alkylanthraquinones because of the absence of hydrogen atoms at the 1- and/or 4-posiThe mixture of smoke phytadienes was separated into tions. Figure I.B-1 also summarizes the various anthraquigroups of phytadienes by alumina column chromatography. nonecarboxylic acids which could arise from the phytadienes Because Rowland (3345) had used the Diels-Alder reaction depicted. of neophytadiene with 1,4-naphthoquinone to great advantage In their study of the smoke from British cigarettes, Johnstone in its characterization, this same reaction sequence was used and Quan (1973) reported that at least 99% of the acyclic phytain the phytadiene study. Treatment of each phytadiene fracdienes comprised neophytadiene. They made no comment on the tion with 1,4-naphthoquinone gave Diels-Alder adducts which presence of phytadiene isomers in the remaining 1%. Since no were converted to anthraquinonecarboxylic acids by sequenquantitative data were provided by Rodgman (3247) in his study tial oxidations, first to alkylanthraquinones and then to carof the phytadiene isomers in tobacco smoke, comparisons of the boxylic acids. The number and positions of the carboxyl groups two investigations are not possible. The Johnstone-Quan study permitted assignment of the conjugated double bonds in the involved the study of tobacco smoke from flue-cured tobacco phytadiene. The phytadiene series contained 3-methylene-7,11, cigarettes, whereas the Rodgman study involved smoke from 15-trimethyl-1-hexadecene (neophytadiene), 3,7,11,15-tetramcigarettes containing a cased American blend (flue-cured, burley, ethyl-1,3-hexadecadiene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-1,3-hexadecaOriental, and Maryland tobaccos). diene, a 1,2,4-trialkyl-1,3-butadiene, and possibly as many as Because of the similarities among the infrared absorpnine other conjugated phytadienes (excluding cis and trans isotion spectra of the gross phytadiene fraction in cigarette mers). No evidence was obtained to indicate that six of the possible isomeric conjugated phytadienes were present in MSS. MSS (3247), the mixture of phytadiene isomers described by They may have either been unreactive in the Diels-Alder reacRowland (3345), and the mixture of phytadienes generated by tion with 1,4-naphthoquinone or, if reactive, gave an adduct heating neophytadiene (180ºC, 2.5 h), Rodgman suggested that was not oxidizable to an alkylanthraquinone. that the isomeric conjugated phytadienes in tobacco smoke The several groups of possible conjugated phytadienes are resulted from thermal isomerization of neophytadiene during more completely defined in structures I through VI: the smoking process. However, as Lam et al. (2260) suggested, CH2 CH3 CH3 e e H[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]n-CH2-C-CH=CH-[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]3-n-H I CH3 CH3 CH3 e e e H[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]n-CH=C-CH=CH-[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]3-n-H II CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 e e e e H[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]m-CH2-CH-CH2-CH=CH-C=CH-CH2-[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]2-m-H III CH3 CH3 CH2 CH3 e e e e H[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]m-CH2-CH-CH2-CH=CH-C-CH-CH2-[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]2-m-H IV CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 e e e e H[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]m-CH2-CH-CH=CH-CH=C-CH2-CH2-[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]2-m-H V CH3 CH3 CH3 CH3 e e e e H[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]m-CH2-C=CH-CH=CH-CH-CH2-CH2-[CH2-CH-CH2-CH2]2-m-H VI
or between contiguous units:
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 34
11/13/08 6:41:40 PM
The Hydrocarbons
35
I, n = 3a
III, m = 2d
I, n = 2b
III, m = 1d
I, n = 1b
III, m = 0d
I, n = 0b II, n = 0b
IV, m = 2b
II, n = 3c
IV, m = 1b
II, n = 2d
IV, m = 0b
II, n = 1d LEGEND anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid. bYields anthraquinone-1,3-dicarboxylic acid. cYields anthraquinone-1,2-dicarboxylic acid. dYields anthraquinone-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid. aYields
FIGURE I.B-1 Phytadienes with potential to yield Diels-Alder adducts and subsequently alkylanthraquinones and anthraquinonecarboxylic acids.
it is highly possible that the various phytadienes may be generated during the smoking process from phytol or phytyl esters in the tobacco. VanDeMeent et al. (4015) reported that chlorophyll-bound phytol yielded several phytadienes when various geological materials containing chlorophylls were pyrolyzed at 610ºC. Lam et al. (2260) reported the presence of at least five different phytadienes in a pyrolysate from phytol heated at 550°C. Neither VanDeMeent et al. nor Lam et al. described the structures of the phytadienes they had identified. Another series of isoprenoid hydrocarbons isolated from cigarette MSS by Rodgman et al. (3297) comprised the solanesol-related solanesenes. Dehydration of solanesol or pyrolysis of solanesyl acetate yields a mixture of solanesenes similar to that isolated from cigarette MSS. VII and VIII are the major components of the solanesene mixture in tobacco smoke. CH2 CH3 R-CH2-C-CH=CH2 VII
e R-CH=C-CH=CH2 VIII CH3
e where R = H-[CH2-C=CH-CH2]8-
Sodium-alcohol reduction of the mixture gave dihydrosolanesene whose infrared spectrum vs. that of the solanesenes was consistent with the migration of the terminal double bond to an internal position. The Diels-Alder reaction sequence used by Rowland (3345) in the characterization of neophytadiene from tobacco and the various phytadienes in cigarette MSS by Rodgman (3247) was applied to the solanesene mixture. It provided confirmatory evidence for the presence of the solanesene VII: reaction of the isolated solanesene mixture with 1,4-naphthoquinone, followed by air oxidation of the adduct, apparently yielded a single 2-alkylanthraquinone rather than the anticipitated mixture of 2-alkyl- and 1,2-dialkylanthraquinones. Only anthraquinone-2-carboxylic acid was isolated and identified as a product of the alkylanthraquinone-to-anthraquinonecarboxylic acid oxidation. The failure to demonstrate the presence of anthraquinone-1,2-dicarboxylic acid was attributed to the inertness of solanesene VIII in the Diels-Alder reaction. Wynder and Hoffmann (4319) reported that the phytadienes did not produce hyperplasia or destroy sebaceous glands when applied to mouse skin. They also reported (4316) that removal of terpenoid hydrocarbons such as the phytadienes from a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)enriched fraction did not significantly alter its sebaceous gland suppression. From this result they concluded that “the
V, m = 2
VI, m = 2
V, m = 1
VI, m = 1
V, m = 0
VI, m = 0
FIGURE I.B-2 Phytadienes with little or no potential to form Diels-Alder adducts.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 35
11/13/08 6:41:42 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
36
terpenes may not contribute significantly to the tumorigenic activity of tobacco smoke.” Entwhistle and Johnstone (1144) described six homologous series of monoalkenes isolated from tobacco smoke, including all of the possible cis and trans isomers. They reported the total delivery of these series in cigarette MSS to be about 3 μg/cigarette. These series did not appear to be present in tobacco leaf. Their precursors in tobacco have not been defined. However, Carruthers and Johnstone (614) earlier had reported that long-chained alkenes in tobacco smoke did not result from the dehydration of the corresponding alcohol during the smoking process. Monoalkene Series H2C=CH-(CH2)n-CH3 H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)n-CH3 CH3-CH=CH-(CH2)n-CH3 a CH3-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)n-CH3 CH3-CH=CH-(CH2)n-CH=(CH3)2 a CH3-CH=CH-(CH2)n-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 a a cis and trans isomers
n= 7 through 25 9 through 28 9 through 28 8 through 27 7 through 26 6 through 25
Rodgman et al. (3294) described the composition of an aliphatic ester fraction isolated from MSS generated by cigarettes fabricated from an American tobacco blend, burley tobacco, or Oriental tobacco. Aliphatic ester fractions almost identical with those from the smokes were also isolated from flue-cured tobacco, burley, and Oriental tobaccos. With the analytical technology available in the early 1960s, the aliphatic ester fraction was shown to consist of a series of esters whose alcohol moiety varied from 1-dodecanol (C12) to 1-heptacosanol (C27), inclusive. The acid moiety ranged from tetradecanoic acid (C14) to octacosanoic acid (C28), inclusive, plus the C18 unsaturated acids, oleic and linolenic. More than two decades later, Arrendale et al. (103) extended the identification of the components of the aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco. The alcohol moiety ranged from 1-hexadecanol (C16) to 1-tetratriacontanol (C34). Esters with 1-hentriacontanol and 1-tritriacontanol as the alcohol moieties were not detected. The acid moiety ranged from dodecanoic acid (C12) to dotriacontanoic acid (C32). An ester with hentriacontanoic acid as the acid moiety was not detected. For a given number of carbons, the acid moiety not only included the normal acid but also in several cases included the iso and/ or anteiso acid, for example, esters were identified with n-, iso-, and anteiso-pentadecanoic acid as the acid moieties. Even though Arrendale et al. (103) limited their study to an ester fraction isolated from tobacco, it seems logical to assume, based on the findings of Rodgman et al. (3294) on the equivalence of the aliphatic ester fractions isolated from various smokes and tobaccos, that each ester identified by Arrendale et al. would appear in tobacco smoke. Controlled thermal degradation of higher molecular weight aliphatic esters generates an alkene and an acid (950c, 3294).
Thermal degradation during the smoking process of the aliphatic esters identified in tobacco could conceivably yield some of the alkenes in the series described by Entwhistle and Johnstone (1144). R-CH2-CH2-OOC-R1 l R-CH=CH2 + R1-COOH 2,6-Dimethyl-2,4,6-octatriene (alloöcimene) was reported by Wynder and Hoffmann (4316) as a significant tobacco smoke component (0.5% of CSC) with cocarcinogenic activity. However, Mold et al. (2597) presented contradictory data which indicated that if 2,6-dimethyl-2,4,6-octatriene were present in smoke, its level was less than 0.006%.
I.C THE ALICYCLIC HYDROCARBONS The cyclic aliphatic hydrocarbons in tobacco and tobacco smoke include compounds whose ring sizes range from cyclopropane through cyclooctane, cyclononane, cycloundecane, and cyclotetradecane. Theoretically, cyclooctatetraene could be included in the listing of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Numerous hydrocarbons with cyclopentane and cyclohexane rings were reported as tobacco and tobacco smoke components in the late 1950s through the mid-1960s (see Table I.C-1). Tobacco smoke hydrocarbons with a cyclobutane ring were reported by Stedman in 1963 (3795). Three dimethylcyclopropanes were reported in 1970 by Bartle and Novotny (200). 1,3,5-Cycloheptatriene and cyclooctatetraene were reported by Enzell et al. (1154) and Mauldin (2506), respectively. A hydrocarbon with the cycloheptatriene ring had been reported previously as a tobacco smoke component in 1947 by Ikeda (1857): the bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbon azulene, an isomer of naphthalene. Several fused-ring alicyclic hydrocarbons obviously derived from tobacco sterols were reported in 1989 in tobacco smoke by Benner et al. (273). In addition to a low level of cholesterol {1a}, tobacco usually contains substantial levels of several phytosterols [campesterol {Ib}, B-sitosterol {Ic}, stigmasterol {Id}, ergosterol {1e}] structurally similar to cholesterol. These phytosterols differ slightly from cholesterol in the structure of the long side chain (Figure I.C-1). They are present in tobacco in both the free and bound form (as glycosides, esters, etc.), and they are transferred as such to mainstream smoke (MSS). The sterols constitute about 0.2% of the tobacco weight. As shown in Figure I.C-1, pyrolysis of cholesterol {Ia} yields chrysene {III}, Diels hydrocarbon {IV}—a methylcyclopentaphenanthrene—and numerous other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Both PAHs noted have also been identified in pyrolysates of the major tobacco phytosterols [Wynder et al. (4356), Van Duuren, (4022)]. While none of the sterols {Ia-Ie} has been shown to generate the potent tumorigen 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) on pyrolysis, Falk et al. (1171) reported that cholesterol and cholesterol esters do generate the mouseskin tumorigens 4-cholesten-3-one {Va} and 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa}. Veldstra (4042a) reported that the pyrolysis of cholesteryl oleate also yielded 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa}.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 36
11/13/08 6:41:42 PM
The Hydrocarbons
37
TABLE I.C-1 Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 37
11/13/08 6:41:45 PM
38
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 38
11/13/08 6:41:47 PM
The Hydrocarbons
39
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 39
11/13/08 6:41:49 PM
40
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 40
11/13/08 6:41:52 PM
The Hydrocarbons
41
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 41
11/13/08 6:41:54 PM
42
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 42
11/13/08 6:41:56 PM
The Hydrocarbons
43
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 43
11/13/08 6:41:59 PM
44
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 44
11/13/08 6:42:07 PM
The Hydrocarbons
45
TABLE I.C-1 (CONTINUED) Alicyclic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Cholesteryl oleate was probably a component of the mixture of steryl esters described in flue-cured tobacco by Rowland and Latimer (3358) and in tobacco smoke by Rodgman et al. (3296). The steryl esters included sterols esterified with a series of saturated (palmitic, stearic, etc) and unsaturated (oleic, linoleic, etc.) acids. In the late 1950s to early 1960s, Rodgman proposed that the tobacco phytosterols—campesterol, B-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and ergosterol—might generate compounds analogous to those generated from cholesterol, that is, 4-campesten-3 -one {Vb}, 3,5-campestadiene {VIb}, B-4-sitosten-3-one {Vc}, 3,5-sitostadiene {VIc}, 4-stigmasten-3-one {Vd}, 3,5-
stigmastadiene {VId}, ergosten-3-one {Ve}, 3,5-ergostatriene {VIe}on thermal degradation of these tobacco phytosterols or their esters during the smoking process. These campesterol-, B-sitosterol-, stigmasterol- and ergosterol-related compounds might also be mouse-skin tumorigens as are their cholesterol counterparts. For nearly a decade, Rodgman and Cook (3286) were unsuccessful in their periodic efforts to isolate any of these steryl ketones or dienes from cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) and identify them. However, Benner et al. (273) did subsequently identify two of these 3,5-dienes, 3,5-campestadiene {VIb} and 3,5-stigmastadiene {VId}, in tobacco smoke, see also Eatough et al. (1099, 1100).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 45
11/13/08 6:42:08 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
46
LEGEND Sterol, R
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3 H3C IV CH3
R CH3
CH3
O
V
R
CH3
CH3 CH3
HO II
I
CH3
R=
Ia Ib Ic Id Ie II
cholesterol -(CH2)3-CH(CH3)2 campesterol -(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2 β-sitosterol -(CH2)2-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2 stigmasterol -CH=CH-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2 ergosterola -CH=CH-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene)
III
chrysene
IV
Diels hydrocarbon
Va Vb Vc Vd Ve
4-cholesten-3-one 4-campesten-3-one β-4-sitosten-3-one stigmasten-3-one ergostadien-3-one
VIa VIb VIc VId VIe
3,5-cholestadiene 3,5-campestadiene β-3,5-sitostadiene 3,5-stigmastadiene 3,5,7-ergostatriene
a
Ergosterol has a double bond at the 7-position
VI
III
FIGURE 1.C-1 Possible sterol degradation products.
Johnstone and Quan (1973) reported that flue-cured tobacco smoke contains several hydrocarbons related to neophytadiene: An aliphatic acyclic hydrocarbon norphytene (2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-1-pentadecene) and the four alicyclic hydrocarbons {VII-X, Figure I.C-2} that are dimers of neophytadiene. These dimers are identical with the major products generated when neophytadiene is heated at 190 to 200°C. The dialkylethenylcyclohexenes {IX and X} were a small proportion of the mixture. The more plentiful pair {VII and VIII} each absorbed two equivalents of hydrogen to form saturated hydrocarbons and were readily dehydrogenated to p- and m-alkylbenzene derivatives readily separable by column chromatography on alumina. Nitric acid oxidation of these benzenoid hydrocarbons generated p-benzenedicarboxylic (terephthalic) and m-benzenedicarboxylic (isophthalic) acids, respectively. Johnstone and Quan (1973) considered and rejected the possibility that the dimer mixture may have been artifactually produced during the laboratory generation, collection and fractionation of the CSC. They noted that “At no time was the condensate subjected to temperatures above 80°C, and that only for short periods, so it is likely that the dimers were formed during the smoking process.” The isolation and identification in the late 1950s and early 1960s of several polyhydronaphthalene derivatives in tobacco and smoke, for example, A- and B-levantenolide* (799, 801,
*
α- and β-Levantenolide are listed by Chemical Abstracts as decahydro3,3’a,6’,6’,9’a-pentamethyl- and 3’a,4’,5’,5’a,6’,7’,8’,9’,9’a,9’b-decahydro3,3’a,6’,6’,9’a-pentamethylspiro[furan-2(3H),2’(1’H)-naphtho[2,1-b] furan]-5(4H)-one, respectively.
1299), A2-levantanolide† (1290, 1300), 12A-hydroxy-13epimanoyl oxide‡ (800, 1298, 3281), sclareolide§ (3272, 3533), and sclaral¶ (3534), subsequently led to the identification of many more such derivatives [see Enzell and Wahlberg reviews (1156, 1157, 4089, 4090)] among which were several polyhydronaphthalenes, such as decahydronaphthalene (222– 224), 4,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydro-1-(1-methylethyl)naphthalene, (1156, 1256, 4090), and its isomer 4,7-dimethyl-1, 2,4a,5,6,8a-hexahydro-1-(1-methylethyl)-naphthalene (A-muurolene) (404), and two isomers of 1,8a-dimethyl7-(1-methylethenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydronaphthalene (valencene and eremophilene) (404). A similar situation occurred with the cyclotetradecanes. Subsequent to the isolation and identification of several hydroxy derivatives and epoxy derivatives of unsaturated cyclotetradecane from tobacco (3195, 3220, 3221, 3361) and smoke (3361), several trimethyl-(1-methylethyl)-substituted cyclotetradecatrienes and tetraenes were identified in tobacco (1149, 1149a, 3853) and/or smoke (2726). Table I.C-1 lists the cyclic aliphatic hydrocarbons identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
†
‡
§
¶
α2-Levantanolide is listed by Chemical Abstracts as dodecahydro-3, 3’a,6’,6’,9’a-pentamethylspiro[furan-2(5H),2’(1’H)-naphtho[2,1-b]furan]5-one. 12α-Hydroxy-13-epimanoyl oxide is listed by Chemical Abstracts as 3-ethenyldodecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl1H-Naphtho[2,1-b] pyran-2-ol. Sclareolide is listed by Chemical Abstracts as decahydro-3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(1H)-one. Sclaral is listed by Chemical Abstracts as dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-ol.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 46
11/13/08 6:42:10 PM
The Hydrocarbons
47
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R VII
VIII
IX
X
R = -CH2 -{(CH2)2 -CH(CH3)-CH2}3 -H
FIGURE I.C-2 Phytadiene dimers.
I.D THE MONOCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS In this section, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are defined as those compounds with one or more nonfused aromatic rings, for example, benzene, biphenyl, terphenyl, and stilbene. Some authors might classify the aromatic hydrocarbons with two or more nonfused rings as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Table I.D-1 lists the monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. None of these compounds was included in Kosak’s 1954 catalog of tobacco smoke components (2170). Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed only five such compounds [benzene, ethenylbenzene (styrene), methylbenzene (toluene), 1,2,4trimethylbenzene (pseudocumene), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (mesitylene)]. By 1964, Elmenhorst and Reckzeh (1139) listed eleven such hydrocarbons (see Table I.D-1). In 1968, Stedman (3797) listed twenty monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The list presented in 1980 by Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) indicated this number had doubled. To date, over eighty monocycylic aromatic hydrocarbons have been identified in tobacco and/or its smoke. In its 1986 review of tobacco smoke components and their relationship to health, the IARC (1870) discussed only three monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, namely, benzene, methylbenzene (toluene), and ethenylbenzene (styrene): Tobacco smoke contains traces of other volatile compounds found to be carcinogenic in humans or in experimental animals. Benzene, a human carcinogen [IARC (1868)], has been reported in the MS of cigarettes (12–48 μg/cigarette) and in the SS of a 100-mm U.S. filter cigarette (453 μg/cigarette) [Wynder and Hoffmann (4332); Elmenhorst and Schultz (1140); Jermini et al. (1947)]. It can be assumed that benzene is formed during the burning of tobacco either from precursors with an aromatic or cyclohexane ring or by pyrosynthesis from primary radicals such as C6H5. … The most abundant volatile hydrocarbon in tobacco smoke is toluene (methylbenzene), which has been reported to occur at levels of up to 164 μg/cigarette in MS and 904 μg in the SS of a 100-mm U.S. nonfilter cigarette (1140, 1947, 4332).
With regard to the carcinogenic activity (actually its leukemogenic activity) of benzene, it was noted: “Sufficient evidence
in animals with new data from US National Toxicology Program (sufficient evidence in humans).” The carcinogenicity of ethenylbenzene was described as follows: “Limited evidence [in] animals (inadequate evidence in humans).” In 1989, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) included benzene in their list of forty-three tumorigens in tobacco and tobacco smoke. They discussed the role of exposure to benzene in tobacco smoke as follows: Significant amounts of benzene are found in cigarette MS (up to 50 μg/cigarette). Sufficient evidence exists that this aromatic hydrocarbon causes leukemia in humans [IARC (1868)]. On the basis of analytical data for exhaled breath, it has been calculated that a smoker inhales about 2 mg of benzene per day while a nonsmoker inhales only 0.2 mg per day [Wallace et al. (4111)]. Former epidemiological studies have not demonstrated a strong association of smoking and leukemia [IARC (1868)]. However, a recent prospective study among 248,000 U.S. veterans indicates that cigarette smokers have a significant increase in mortality from leukemia [Kinlen and Rogot (2096)].
Examination of the compendia of compounds tested for carcinogenicity [Hartwell (1543, 1544), Shubik and Hartwell (3664, 3665), Thompson et al. (3908)] reveals that not only has benzene been tested for its carcinogenicity per se to skin (mouse, rat, guinea pig, rabbit, monkey) but also it has been used as the solvent for application of hundreds of compounds (PAHs, their alkyl and other derivatives, plus their nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur analogs; quinones; aromatic aza-arenes; aromatic amines; sterols and sterol-related compounds) to the skin of a variety of laboratory animals. In many of these latter experiments, groups of “solvent control” animals were painted with benzene at the same time as other test groups were painted with benzene solutions of the compound(s) under investigation. Despite the hundreds of animals skinpainted with benzene, only in very few cases were carcinomas or other tumors observed at the painting site in the “solvent control” benzene-treated animals or in the animals treated in the benzene carcinogenicity studies. Examination of the references listed for benzene provides an indication of the amount of research and discussion pertinent to the presence of benzene in tobacco smoke. Rodgman and Green (3300) in their discussion of toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke noted that subsequent lists and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 47
11/13/08 6:42:11 PM
48
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.D-1 Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 48
11/13/08 6:42:13 PM
The Hydrocarbons
49
TABLE I.D-1 (CONTINUED) Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 49
11/13/08 6:42:15 PM
50
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.D-1 (CONTINUED) Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 50
11/13/08 6:42:18 PM
The Hydrocarbons
51
TABLE I.D-1 (CONTINUED) Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 51
11/13/08 6:42:20 PM
52
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.D-1 (CONTINUED) Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 52
11/13/08 6:42:22 PM
The Hydrocarbons
53
TABLE I.D-1 (CONTINUED) Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 53
11/13/08 6:42:25 PM
54
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.D-1 (CONTINUED) Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 54
11/13/08 6:42:27 PM
The Hydrocarbons
discussions generated after that of IARC (1870) included not only benzene but also ethenylbenzene (styrene) [see Table 2 in (3265) and Table 1 in (3300)] and methylbenzene (toluene) [see Table 1 in (3300)].
I.E
THE POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
Classified as toxicants in many of the substances to which humans are exposed are the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Such exposures include air pollutants from a variety of sources, foodstuffs and beverages, and tobacco smoke. Since the early 1950s, the composition of the latter has been more completely defined than that of any other consumer product. Over 5200 components have been identified in tobacco smoke and among these are over 500 PAHs either completely or partially identified. Because of the tumorigenicity of many PAHs, much research has been conducted in attempts to define the relationship between the PAH structures and their specific tumorigenicities in laboratory animals. None of the theories to date completely answers all the questions. In 2006 Rodgman and Perfetti (3306a) cataloged the PAHs completely or partially identified in cigarette smoke, as a prelude to an attempt to develop a more reasonable PAH structure-tumorigenicity relationship. Additionally, they tabulated the PAHs considered in several previous studies on structure-tumorigenicity relationships, studies that dealt primarily with all-benzenoid PAHs. The majority of the information included in Section I.E comes from the 2006 article from Rodgman and Perfetti (3306a). Tobacco and tobacco products in the forms of leaf, shredded or grounded tobacco, and various forms of cigars and cigarettes have been available to individuals for ages. For centuries people have enjoyed tobacco but have been admonished of its potential health concerns. Health concerns for cigarette smokers have increased steadily since the early 1950s due to the rapid development and advancement in separation sciences, toxicology and medicine. In his 1954 publication, Kosak (2170) was the first person to catalog compounds reported in tobacco smoke. His list contained fewer than 100 compounds and a significant number were incorrectly characterized. Today over 5200 compounds have been identified as components in tobacco smoke [see Figure 1, p. 140 in (1373)]. Over the past fifty years, the tobacco industry has made significant progress in both the identification of tobacco and smoke components and the development of technologies to reduce cigarette smoke yields. Significant efforts continue in government, academia, and especially the tobacco industry to understand the health effects of smoking and to develop cigarette products with reduced health risks for smokers. One class of tobacco smoke components that has been studied extensively and intensively is the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) due to their potential health concerns. Periodically, tobacco researchers have reported the progress on the identification of tobacco and smoke components. Review articles by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) and Izawa (1900) detailed the tobacco and smoke research conducted
55
over 100 years. Izawa listed 440 identified smoke components by 1961. Quin (3059) published a review of components found in tobacco and smoke. Herrmann (1625) reviewed phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke. In 1963, Philip Morris (2939) published a monograph on tobacco and smoke composition, a copy of which was provided to the Advisory Committee on smoking and health to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999). In 1964, Elmenhorst and Reckzeh (1139) tabulated the aromatic hydrocarbons identified in tobacco smoke. Kuhn (2226) published an article on alkaloids in tobacco and smoke. In their 1967 book, Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) discussed tobacco and smoke chemistry and the results of animal studies with tobacco smoke. Elmenhorst and Schultz (1140) listed 250 low-boiling components and vapor-phase components identified in tobacco smoke. In his 1968 review, Stedman (3797) listed nearly 1200 identified tobacco and smoke components. The next year, Neurath (2724) reported on the presence of 180 nitrogen-containing compounds in smoke. With the meaningful advancements in analytical methodology, the number of tobacco and smoke components increased dramatically (1371). At R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT), Schumacher et al. (3553), Heckman and Best (1587), and Newell et al. (2769) identified over 1500 compounds in the water-soluble and ether-soluble fractions of tobacco smoke. In 1977, Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) cataloged nearly 500 N-containing compounds identified in tobacco smoke but their catalog did not include the more than 230 N-containing compounds newly identified in tobacco smoke by Heckman and Best (1587). Between 1974 and 1978, Snook et al. (3732, 3756–3759) published the results of their massive study of the PAHs identified in tobacco smoke, a study that was followed by an equally definitive one published in 1981 on the aza-arenes in tobacco smoke (3750). In 1980, Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed 1889 identified tobacco smoke components in their monograph. However, a tally of the reported tobacco smoke components at that time exceeded 2500. No additional catalogs of the total number of identified components of cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) have been published since the 1980 Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) publication. Smith et al. (3712) recently reported the chemical structures of the 253 identified phenols reported in cigarette MSS. Numerous catalogs of PAHs identified in MSS have been compiled from 1955 through 2005. Table I.E-1 is a chronology of catalogs of PAHs in MSS. It contains the year of each catalog, author (and reference), and the number of PAHs listed. The catalogs prior to 2006 contain much overlap in terms of the PAHs identified. In 2006 Rodgman and Perfetti (3306a) published a report that attempted to eliminate the overlap and clearly present the 539 PAHs identified in MSS. The intent of this section is to present a referenced catalog of the completely or partially characterized* PAHs in tobacco, tobacco MSS, and MSS of tobacco substitutes. The catalog to follow (Table I.E-6) contains the CAS registration number, chemical name, structure, and alphabetical listing of references on PAHs. *
The term “partially characterized” or “partially identified” indicates that the position of one or more alkyl substituents was not determined.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 55
11/13/08 6:42:27 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
56
TABLE I.E-1 Chronology of Catalogs of PAHs in MSS Year 1954 1955 1957 1958 1959 1960 1962 1963 1963 1964 1965 1967 1968 1975 1976 1977 1978 1980 1997 2005
Author Kosak Latimer Latimer and Rodgman Rodgman Johnstone and Plimmer Rodgman and Menz Rodgman et al. Philip Morris Rodgman et al. Elmenhorst and Reckzeh Rodgman et al. Rodgman and Woosley Stedman Roberts et al. Snook et al. Snook et al. Snook et al. Ishiguro and Sugawara Williams et al. Rodgman and Perfetti
No. of PAHs Listed a
4 10 33 36 57 68 77 61 77 70 85 85 79 206 252b 157b 438b 191 427c 539d
Ref. 2170 2270 2292a 3245 1971 3301 3303 2939 3304 1139 3302 3308 3797 3224 3758 3756 3757 1884 4249 3306a
a
Three of the PAHs listed were identified in a destructive distillate of tobacco, not in tobacco smoke.
b
In the three articles on the PAH study by Snook et al. (3756–3758), some identified PAHs were listed in more than one article.
c
In several instances, more than one isomer was reported for some monoalkyl-, dialkyl-, trialkyl-, and tetraalkyl-PAHs but the positions of the alkyl groups were not determined. In the case of such multiple alkyl isomers, only one was listed in this report.
d
This list includes the number of isomers of monoalkyl-, dialkyl-, trialkyl-, and tetraalkyl-PAHs reported where the positions of the alkyl groups were not determined.
The significant increase in the number of studies on tobacco smoke composition was triggered by the following events: (a) The results in the early 1950s from several retrospective epidemiology studies (1026a, 1027, 3529, 4306b) in which it was reported that an association existed between cigarette smoking and the incidence of lung cancer in smokers, (b) a 1953 report of the production of skin carcinoma in susceptible laboratory animals skin painted repeatedly with a concentrated solution of cigarette MSS condensate supposedly produced under conditions simulating the human smoking of a cigarette (4306a), (c) the realization in 1954 that very little (2170) was known about the composition of tobacco smoke to which consumers had been exposed for nearly 400 years, and (d) the incorporation of chromatography into the overall methodology of the fractionation of complex mixtures such as tobacco smoke. Naturally, these findings raised several questions. The first dealt with the identity of the cigarette MSS component(s) responsible for the smoking-lung cancer association in smokers and the skin tumor induction in laboratory animals. Because
of extensive data generated on the specific tumorigenicity of about 25% of the hundreds of PAHs synthesized between 1929 and the early 1950s (1543, 1544), PAHs were considered the most likely tumorigenic agents in cigarette MSS even though their presence was not certain. Eventually, numerous PAHs were identified in cigarette MSS. Because of its MSS level and its high specific tumorigenicity in several bioassays, one PAH was subjected to intense scrutiny: Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). As a carcinogen, B[a]P elicited carcinomas at the painting site in the mouse-skin bioassay. As a sarcogen, B[a] P elicited sarcomas in rodent bioassays involving subcutaneous injection. One class of tobacco smoke components studied extensively is the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. As reported by Rodgman (3262), between 1950 and 1970, an extensive amount of research was conducted on tobacco- and cigarette smoke-related topics. The information generated led to the development of several significant cigarette design technologies that resulted in the modification of the delivery and composition of cigarette MSS. The following is a brief chronology of the events occurring in the tobacco smoke-PAH situation. In 1939, the PAHs anthracene, phenanthrene, and B[a]P were reported as components of a tobacco-related material by Roffo (3323–3325) and his son (3316, 3318). In discussions of tobacco smoke, the Roffo findings are generally disregarded because the three PAHs they reported were not detected in tobacco smoke but in a destructive distillate of tobacco. However, Roffo did report another finding that led to much research both within and outside the tobacco industry. Roffo reported that comparison of the destructive distillate of tobacco with that of an ethanol-extracted tobacco indicated (3327) that the PAH content and specific tumorigenicity of the extracted tobacco destructive distillate were reduced from those of the destructive distillate from the control tobacco. Roffo speculated that the precursors of the tumorigenic PAH components of his distillates were ethanol-soluble phytosterols. Eventually his prediction, as far as it went, was found to be true for cigarette MSS (3269, 3616). Because he was unaware of the presence in tobacco of long-chained terpenoids such as solanesol, identified in flue-cured tobacco in 1957 by Rowland et al. (3359), Roffo obviously could not include them in his 1942 precursor prediction. It should be noted that the findings by Roffo on destructive distillates of tobacco were subsequently equivalent to the effects observed in smoked tobacco, that is, organic solvent-extraction of a tobacco or tobacco blend which was then incorporated into cigarettes gave MSS with reduced PAH levels and specific tumorigenicity to mouse skin compared to the MSS from control tobacco. However, usually the reduction in specific tumorigenicity was less than the reduction in PAHs, particularly B[a]P. The generation in the early 1950s of carcinomas in laboratory animals (mice) skin-painted with a solution of the mainstream “tar” from commercial cigarettes (4306a) led to numerous studies to identify the possible causative agent(s) in the “tar.” Since much more tumorigenicity data and knowledge were available on PAHs than on any other class of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 56
11/13/08 6:42:28 PM
The Hydrocarbons
compounds, most of the effort was concentrated on identifying PAHs in cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) as the possible cause of the tumorigenicity. Because of its demonstrated potency as an initiator of carcinomas on skin painting and the wealth of information on it, B[a]P became the target of much research on CSC. In 1951, Hartwell (1544) listed nearly 350 studies on the tumorigenicity of B[a]P administered in various ways to various species. The other previously studied PAHs were dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) and 1,2dihydro-3-methylbenz[ j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) with 240 and 303 reported biological studies, respectively. Benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a] anthracene (DMB[a]A) were listed with twenty and thirtytwo studies, respectively. In the twenty studies reported by Hartwell (1544), a malignant tumor was noted in only one instance with B[a]A. Although B[a]P was reported as a CSC component in the mid-1950s by several American (55–57, 592–594) and British investigators (820) on the basis of spectral evidence, Fieser, as late as 1957 (1181), considered the published evidence to be inadequate as proof of the presence of B[a]P in CSC. Obviously, in 1957 Fieser was unaware of the report by Rodgman in 1956 (3240) on the isolation of crystalline B[a] P from MSS or the reports by Falk and Kotin in 1955 and 1956 (1172) on the determination of the per cigarette yields of B[a]P (plus B[a]A and dibenzo[def,p]chrysene) in MSS and sidestream smoke (SSS). Shortly thereafter, in 1959, Wynder and Hoffmann reported the isolation of B[a]P in crystalline form from CSC (4307), thus ending the controversy about its presence in cigarette smoke. In 1954, knowledge of cigarette MSS composition was extremely limited. As mentioned earlier, Kosak (2170) listed fewer than 100 components reported in tobacco smoke and many of those listed were incorrect. Some of the early research on cigarette MSS composition, particularly the PAHs, was conducted at RJRT.* Complete details of the experimental procedures and findings are available on the Internet at www.rjrtdocs.com. The initial RJRT PAH investigation involved eleven PAHs in the MSS from nonfiltered cigarettes (3240, 3244) [(see Table 1 in (3262)]. Naphthalene, anthracene, pyrene, fluoranthene, and B[a]P, isolated in crystalline form, were characterized by UV absorption spectral data as well as by classical chemical means (mixture melting point, IR spectra, derivatization, and derivative properties). The other six PAHs were identified on the basis of agreement of their UV absorption spectra with those of authentic samples or with published UV data.
*
Numerous formal in-house reports and memoranda authored by RJRT R&D personnel are cited herein. Many have been published totally or in part in peer-reviewed journals and/or presented totally or in part at scientific conferences (Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conferences, American Chemical Society Symposia on Tobacco and Smoke, CORESTA Conferences, etc.). Whether published, presented, or neither, copies of all RJRT reports cited are stored in various repositories such as the one in Minnesota. Their contents are available on the Internet address indicated. Experimental procedures used, data collected, and interpretations summarized here are described in detail in the reports cited.
57
The second RJRT investigation involved the MSS from filter-tipped cigarettes (3249, 3273) [see Table 2 in (3262)]. In that study forty-four PAHs, including the eleven PAHs found in the initial study were identified (3240, 3244). Of the forty-four PAHs, fourteen were isolated in crystalline form and characterized by both UV spectral and classical chemical means [see Table 1 in (3262)]. B[a]P, B[a]A, DB[a,h]A, and several other PAHs were also isolated in crystalline form from the CSC (3240, 3244, 3273). The other thirty were identified from the agreement of their UV absorption spectra with those of authentic samples or with published spectra. B[a]P, B[a]A, and DB[a,h]A had been reported to be tumorigenic to mouse skin although the bioassay data for B[a]A were contradictory (983, 1543, 1544). Although much of the early research at RJRT R&D on the identification of PAHs in MSS and the effect of various tobacco blends and/or treatments on their MSS yields was summarized in several recent publications (3262, 3307), other members of the U.S. tobacco industry were also much involved in similar research in the 1960s and 1970s. The following paragraphs provide a few examples of their early efforts. At Philip Morris in 1963, Robb et al. (3191) described the identification of fourteen PAHs (naphthalene, fluorene, anthracene, 9-methylanthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, 1-methylpyrene, B[a]P, B[e]P, DB[a,h]A, benz[e]acephenanthrylene, perylene, benzo[ghi]perylene), biphenyl, and the aza-arene, carbazole, in cigarette MSS. Almost all the details in this 1963 Philip Morris in-house report were subsequently presented at the 1964 CORESTA meeting and published in 1965 (3191). Also at Philip Morris, Carpenter (606a) in 1964 described the per cigarette B[a]P yields from several commercial cigarettes; Oakley (2817a) in 1965 reported the per cigarette B[a]P yields from cigarettes fabricated from different tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Oriental); Segura (3579a) in 1966 reported the contribution of cigarette paper to the per cigarette B[a]P yield; Johnson (1962b) in 1965 described the effect of a tobacco additive, aluminum chloride, on the MSS B[a]P yield; and Oakley (2817b) in 1966 determined the difference in per cigarette B[a]P yield in MSS and SSS. At British American Tobacco Company (BAT) in 1966, Chakraborty and Thornton (646a) studied the effect of various additives on MSS PAHs. The changes in the per cigarette yields of a variety of PAHs were determined. They included anthracene, B[a]A, benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, B[a]P, B[e]P, chrysene, fluoranthene, fluorene, methylfluorene, phenanthrene, several alkylphenanthrenes, dimethylphenanthrene, pyrene, and several benzofluorenes.† Although studies on PAHs in MSS were conducted at RJRT and Liggett and Myers Tobacco Company (L&M) in the 1960s, publications only dealt with analytical techniques. For example, in 1963 Mold et al. (2596a) at L&M described †
At the Internet address, http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/cgi, by inserting the topic “aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons,” one may access over twenty BAT and Brown and Williamson (B&W) memoranda by Chakraborty, Thornton, and others on PAHs in tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 57
11/13/08 6:42:29 PM
58
the use of a compound, tetramethyluric acid, that complexes with polycyclic compounds. It was a procedure reminiscent of the finding of the water-soluble purine-PAH complex defined by Weil-Malherbe (4161a), a finding subsequently developed into an alternative analytical method for the determination of PAHs and aza-arenes in tobacco smoke and other media by Rothwell and Whiteheart (3337–3340). Although the study was not described as relating to tobacco smoke, Cundiff and Markunas (869) at RJRT in 1963 reported a titrimetric analysis of the nitro groups in numerous PAH:2,4,7-trinitrofluorenone complexes as a means to define the molecular weight of the PAH. All but one of the PAH:2,4,7-trinitrofluorenone complexes could be obtained from the PAH fraction of cigarette MSS. Of course, there were also methods developed for the in-house determination of specific PAHs, particularly B[a] P by Bell (239a) at Lorillard, Oakley and Stahr (2820a) at Philip Morris, and Walker (4110) and Stamey et al. (3787, 3789) at RJRT. These and many other in-house reports on PAHs demonstrate that the early PAH research was not limited to academic or governmental laboratories or to laboratories at private institutions such as the Sloan-Kettering Institute, American Health Foundation, or Roswell Park Memorial Institute. Many of the tobacco industry reports on PAHs listed above may now be accessed at the Internet addresses cited in the references. Additional PAHs, both tumorigenic and nontumorigenic, were subsequently identified in CSC but the level of B[a] P in CSC could account for very little (1056, 3310, 3311, 4354) or less than 2% of the observed skin-painting effect (4312, 4354), the contribution of all the known tumorigenic PAHs in CSC could account for not much more than 3% of the observed effect. These findings led to the proposal by Wynder and Wright (4354) that CSC contained a PAH that either possessed the same specific tumorigenicity as B[a]P but was present at about fifty times the B[a]P level or present in MSS was an unknown PAH that was “supercarcinogenic” compared to B[a]P, that is, its specific tumorigenicity to mouse skin was forty to fifty times that of B[a]P. After an eighteen-month search, Wright, a colleague of Wynder from the early to the late 1950s, concluded that neither type of PAH was present in CSC. Subsequently, the absence of a “supercarcinogen” in CSC was confirmed by the identification of hundreds of PAHs in the PAH fraction of CSC by Snook et al. (3756–3759). Detailed examination of their lists does not reveal the presence of a PAH structurally different from any of those previously classified with regard to their specific tumorigenicity on mouse-skin painting. No other CSC fraction possessed specific tumorigenicity to mouse-skin comparable to the PAH fraction. In the mid1950s, the tumorigenicity of the N-nitrosamines in CSC was not an issue, for several reasons: (1) the tumorigenicity of an N-nitrosamine was first defined in 1956 (2441a), (2) the presence of N-nitrosamines in MSS was not suggested until the early 1960s (422, 423, 1057), and (3) of the more than 300 N-nitrosamines tested for tumorigenicity, only one type not found in tobacco smoke—the N-nitrosoalkylureas—was
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
found to be tumorigenic to mouse skin [e.g., see Appendixes A–D in (2991)]. Consideration of all the tumorigenic PAHs and their levels in CSC could account for no more than 3% of the observed biological activity in mouse skin-painting studies. In 1961, Wynder and Hoffmann (4312) stated: The polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons are mainly formed during the combustion of tobacco. The tobacco of our standard cigarettes contains only very minute quantities of benzo(a)pyrene [sic] (0.02 ppm). A bioassay indicates that these polycyclic hydrocarbons of the condensate by themselves, however, can account for not more than 3 per cent of the total biological activity.
In 1967, they reiterated their 1961 comment (4340): Without belaboring the point as to whether BaP as such contributes to the carcinogenicity of tobacco smoke condensate, we can certainly agree that the concentration of BaP may be regarded as an “indicator” of carcinogenic PAH in tobacco smoke condensate … While BaP and other carcinogenic PAH can by themselves account for only a small portion of the total tumorigenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate, probably less than 2%, they are, nevertheless, of obligatory importance as tumor initiators.
Hoffmann and Wynder (1800) reported that the major carcinogenicity of CSC resided in the CSC fraction containing the bulk of the PAHs. However, the levels in CSC of the nonalkylated carcinogenic PAHs could explain no more than 1% to 3% of the observed activity. They also reported that the artificial doubling and tripling of the levels of the seventeen known tumorigenic PAHs in CSC significantly increased the tumorigenicity of the CSC. However, their biological findings were contradicted by those of Roe (3310, 3311) and Lazar et al. (2320) who reported that increasing the level of B[a] P in CSC by a factor of ten or thirty, respectively, produced no increase in the specific carcinogenicity of the CSC. Roe (3310, 3311) also noted that the CSC level of B[a]P, despite its known tumorigenic potency, accounted for very little of the observed specific tumorigenicity of CSC to mouse skin. The opposite of these observations were the findings that potently tumorigenic PAHs such as DB[a,h]A on subcutaneous injection [Dobrovolskaia-Zavadskaia (1021)] and B[a]P on mouse skin painting [Poel et al. (2970a)] exhibited a threshold value. Wynder et al. (4303) reported that mice skin painted with the equivalent of the B[a]P content of the CSC from over 500 current cigarettes developed no carcinomas. Rabbits were found to be even more resistant to higher dose levels of B[a]P. Paralleling the research on the presence or absence of PAHs in cigarette MSS, their precursors in tobacco, their mechanism of formation, their contribution to laboratory animal tumorigenesis, and their possible involvement in the smoking-health issue was extensive research on ways to generate a “less hazardous” cigarette by removal of PAHs from or reduction of their per cigarette yields in MSS. To successfully resolve these questions, much pioneering research and development were initiated in late 1954 (3262). When the question of the presence of PAHs in MSS was resolved, with
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 58
11/13/08 6:42:30 PM
The Hydrocarbons
many PAHs identified, and their per cigarette MSS yields determined, much effort was expended to develop technologies to reduce their MSS yield, particularly the yields of those PAHs reported to be tumorigenic to CSC-painted mouse skin. In the early 1960s, a “less hazardous” cigarette was defined on the basis of three criteria [see p. iii in (1329); p. 372 in (4319); pp. 503, 531 in (4332)]: (1) the per cigarette yield of a specific toxicant has been lowered, (2) the ratio of the specific toxicant to MSS “tar” has been lowered, and (3) the specific tumorigenicity of the MSS “tar” as measured in the mouse skin-painting bioassay has been lowered. With the advent of meaningful tests for mutagenicity and genotoxicity, criterion (3) has been modified to include them. The tobacco industry and nonindustry scientists investigated many additional approaches in the attempt to design a “less hazardous” cigarette [see Table 5 in (3262), Table 14 in (3300)]. Two examples of technologies that appeared to be promising but presented other toxicant problems were the organic solventextraction of tobacco and the use of oxidative additives. The extraction concept was patterned after the findings of Roffo (3327) with one addition, the hexane extract of the tobacco was partitioned between hexane and aqueous ethanol to separate the flavorful compounds from those considered to be the PAH precursors, that is, the phytosterols, the aliphatic hydrocarbons, the long-chained terpenoids (116, 121, 3189). When the extracted tobacco was smoked in cigarette form, its CSC showed much lower PAH levels than the control tobacco CSC (3241, 3246, 4356) and reduced tumorigenicity (4356). The flavorful components, when returned to the extracted tobacco and smoked in cigarette form, contributed little to the total PAHs or B[a]P in the MSS [see Figure 1, Table 3, and accompanying text in (3262)]. The solvent extraction removed from the tobacco not only many of the PAH precursors but also much of several potent anticarcinogens to such tumorigens as B[a]P and DB[a,h]A, for example, long-chained aliphatic hydrocarbons, d-limonene, A-tocopherol, A- and B-1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)4,8,13-cyclodecatriene-1,3-diol [see Table 11 in (3300)]. Thus, because of their removal from the tobacco, the anticarcinogens obviously could not be transferred to MSS during smoking. Before some of the problems were discovered, the investigation of the benefits supposedly derived from the organic solvent-extraction of tobacco led to several patents on the technology (121, 2713, 2717, 3189). The earliest major non-tobacco industry proponents of the contribution of the extraction technology to a “less hazardous” cigarette eventually dismissed it with the comment that the technology was “impractical both technically and economically” (4311) and “of academic interest only” (4306d). Most of the findings on tobacco components that were, and tobacco components that were not, significant precursors of MSS PAHs in this early study were confirmed some years later by Severson et al. (3616). The problems arising from the organic solvent extraction included the increased levels of nitrate and the biopolymers cellulose, starch, and pectin in the solvent-extracted tobacco. These consequences increased the yields of nitric oxide, N-nitrosamines, and phenols (3277) in the MSS.
59
Although nitrate addition reduced the per cigarette yields of FTC “tar,” MSS PAHs, phenols, and CSC tumorigenicity to mouse skin (1797), it was subsequently shown, as predicted (1798), to significantly increase the yields of MSS N-nitrosamines and nitrogen oxides (480). Thus, the recommendation to add nitrate to tobacco to reduce MSS PAHs was eventually replaced by the recommendation to use lownitrate tobacco in the cigarette blend and/or remove nitrate from the tobacco (480). This reversal of recommendations was paralleled by another concerning the level of longchained hydrocarbons such as n-hentriacontane in tobacco: Originally, it was proposed to reduce MSS PAHs by selection of tobaccos with low levels of such components or remove the PAH precursors by organic solvent extraction. This was replaced by a proposal to select tobaccos with high levels of such components (480). By the early 1960s, several cigarette design technologies developed by the tobacco industry and used in commercial products were categorized as significant in their contribution to the “less hazardous” cigarette (4310). Ultimately, the initial four design technologies (tobacco blend, effective and efficient filtration, reconstituted tobacco sheet (RTS), and air dilution via cigarette paper porosity) were increased to eight (tobacco blend, filter tip, filter tip additives, RTS, paper additives, expanded tobacco, air dilution [paper porosity], and air dilution [filter tip perforation]). Their significance was recognized in “less hazardous” cigarette design by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2683)* and the U.S. Surgeon General [see Table 6 in (3262), Table 15 in (3300), 3999, 4005, 4009, 4010]. It should be noted that the first two technologies considered significant were used before 1954. Tobacco or tobacco blend selection had been used since 1913, even before the first tumors were induced in a laboratory animal by skin painting with a solution of coal tar (4361). RTS was introduced into cigarette blends in 1953 when little was known about the chemical composition or biological properties of tobacco smoke (2170) or the effect of RTS inclusion in the blend on them. When knowledge of tumor induction with CSC and the presence of PAHs including B[a]P became available, it was shown that use of these two technologies resulted in a cigarette whose MSS was in compliance with that in the definition of a “less hazardous” cigarette (3300). Of course, the initial thrust of this across-the-board reduction was aimed at reducing the MSS “tar” delivery because of extrapolation by Wynder et al. (4351) of their 1957 mouseskin bioassay findings: Although it is difficult to estimate a comparable exposure level for man, the human data in line with the animal data indicate that a reduction in total tar exposure will be followed *
All eight cigarette design technologies eventually classified as significant by NCI, several U.S. Surgeon Generals, and other investigators on the basis of the 10-year NCI Smoking and Health Program on the “less hazardous” cigarette had been incorporated into one or more U.S. commercial cigarette products prior to the first meeting of the Tobacco Working Group formed in 1968 for the NCI program. In other words, from 1968 to 1978, no new design technology was generated in the NCI Smoking and Health Program on the “less hazardous” cigarette.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 59
11/13/08 6:42:31 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
60
by a decrease in tumor formation. For this reason, measures directed toward this reduction are of utmost importance … The minimum dose of tar capable of producing papillomas in mice is about one third, of producing cancer one half, that of the optimum dose …The practical implications of these data and their relationship to the human cancer problem have been emphasized.
In his 1957 testimony during the filter-tipped cigarette hearings, Wynder reiterated this opinion that reducing “tar” exposure dose by 40% to 50% would substantially reduce lung cancer induction in smokers (4296). Examination of the sales-weighted average “tar” delivery for U.S. commercial cigarettes reveals that the 40% to 50% reduction in MSS “tar” delivery considered vital by Wynder in 1957 was achieved in the late 1960s, that is, a reduction from 38 to 39 mg/cigarette to 19 to 20 mg/cigarette. Further examination reveals that by the early 1980s, the sales-weighted average “tar” was reduced to about 12 mg/cigarette, that is, an additional 40% reduction had been achieved [see Figure 3 in (3262)]. Corresponding reductions in the per cigarette yields of total PAHs in general, B[a]P in particular (4158), and nicotine were also observed. These reductions were also accompanied by a reduction in the specific tumorigenicity (mouse-skin painting) of the MSS CSC (4005). By year-end 1963, ninety-one of the ninety-seven PAHs identified in MSS were reported in the published literature. Six PAHs, identified in MSS by Rodgman and Cook (3273), had not been reported publicly at that time. However, by 1970, identification in MSS of all but one (cholanthrene) of the ninety-seven had been reported. Despite the availability of such information, only eighteen MSS PAHs were discussed by the Advisory Committee in its 1964 Report to the U.S. Surgeon General, thirteen as mainstream CSC components and five as carbon black components (3999). The detailed discussion of so few MSS PAHs and citation of so few publications were done despite the fact the committee had been provided with a detailed Philip Morris monograph on tobacco and smoke composition, a monograph that listed sixty-one PAHs identified in tobacco smoke plus many pertinent published references to them (2939, 3262). The Advisory Committee did note, however, that twenty-seven other nontumorigenic PAHs—none specifically named—had been identified in tobacco smoke. The twenty-seven unnamed PAHs had to include several of those PAHs, for example, naphthalene,
anthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, which had been reported to significantly inhibit the action of potently tumorigenic PAHs such as B[a]P and DB[a,h]A in laboratory animal studies. Of the ninety-seven PAHs known to him, Rodgman (3262) discussed the forty-four PAHs identified at RJRT plus thirty-four other PAHs reported in the literature in numerous reports between 1954 and 1964 and in a summary 1964 report on ten-year research on cigarette MSS (3251). Interestingly, Chapter 6, in the Advisory Committee’s report on cigarette smoke chemistry and the tumorigenic PAHs, was primarily authored by Fieser, one of the two eminent American PAH authorities at that time. For over half a century, numerous theories have been advanced in attempts to explain the relationship between the tumorigenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in treated laboratory animals and a variety of their structural properties, including such properties as their K-, L-, and bayregions, electron distribution, bond orders, bond strengths, resonance, octanol-water partitioning, and the like (Figure I.E-1). Such studies were triggered by the discovery that certain PAHs when administered to laboratory animals via skin painting or subcutaneous injection induced carcinomas or sarcomas, respectively. DB[a,h]A, synthesized independently by Clar (760) and Fieser and Dietz (1184) in 1929, was shown to be a potent tumorigen to laboratory animals by Kennaway and Hieger (2078). Shortly thereafter, Cook et al. (797) isolated several PAHs from coal tar, characterized one of them as the previously unknown benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), and demonstrated that it too was a potent tumorigen to laboratory animals (194). Over the next two decades, the first demonstrations of the carcinogenicity of two pure compounds, DB[a,h] A and B[a]P, led to the synthesis and subsequent testing for tumorigenicity in laboratory animals of literally hundreds of PAHs and their alkyl derivatives plus other derivatives. During this time, the variation in biological responses observed with laboratory animals to individual PAHs eventually led to numerous unacceptable extrapolations of the results to PAH-exposed humans. To put the laboratory animalto-human extrapolation in perspective, Shear and Leiter (3627) in 1941 issued a list of pertinent factors to be considered in such an extrapolation. Despite a diminution in PAH synthesis and tumorigenicity research during World War II, the wealth of experimental data available in the late 1940s to early 1950s on the high-to-slight tumorigenic potency of some PAHs and the nontumorigenicity of other PAHs
Bay region L region
K region
FIGURE I.E-1 The L region, K region, and bay region of benz[a]anthracene.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 60
11/13/08 6:42:32 PM
The Hydrocarbons
induced investigators to seek reasons for the observed differences in tumorigenicity and to attempt to develop explanations for them. Among those involved in the generation of the major early theories on the relationship between PAH structural properties and PAH tumorigenicity or lack of it were Coulson (829), Pullman and Pullman (3003), Daudel and Daudel (906a), Fieser et al. (1180a), Fieser (1180b), and Lacassagne et al. (2247a). Much meaningful input to these theories was provided by other investigators such as Pauling (2910a) in the United States, Boyland, Weigert, and Mottram (423a) in the United Kingdom, and Buu-Hoï in France [see more than thirty Buu-Hoï references listed in (2247a)]. More recent studies include those by Herndon et al. (1623a, 2435a), Rubin (3365), Trosko (3966a), L. Zhang et al. (4410c), and Y. Zhang, a graduate student under Herndon (4410d). Because it was issued at the beginning of the extensive research on the composition of tobacco smoke with particular emphasis on the nature and levels of the PAHs in it, it is interesting to examine the lengthy 1955 review by Pullman and Pullman (3003) on the relationship between electronic structure and the tumorigenicity of a number of benzenoid hydrocarbons. Their publication was a detailed update of the 1953 review by Coulson (829) and included much data generated in the interim. The Pullmans used calculations based on three theoretical indexes of the K and L regions of the aromatic hydrocarbons. The indexes included carbon localization energy (CLE), bond localization energy (BLE), and para localization energy (PLE) [see Table 1 in (3003)]. The Pullmans (3003), by use of their CLE, BLE, and PLE calculations pertinent to the K and L regions in the PAHs, also attempted to relate the structures of various PAHs and their alkylated derivatives not only to their tumorigenicity but also to their rate of reaction in certain well-known reactions, for example, the Diels-Alder reaction with maleic anhydride, reaction with osmium tetroxide, reaction with lead tetraacetate, and photooxidation. Table I.E-2 lists the hydrocarbons discussed by the Pullmans in 1955 with an indication of those, thirty-four in all, that were identified in tobacco smoke before and after 1955. The Pullmans did introduce into their discussion various PAH metabolites, their diols and phenols, but not the epoxides which were unknown at that time. Even though it had been known since 1951 (3814), no explanation was offered for the inhibition of the activity of a potently tumorigenic PAH by co-administration of a weakly tumorigenic or nontumorigenic PAH. Lastly, of course, neither the Pullmans nor Coulson discussed the fact that a bioassay finding with a highly susceptible strain or species of laboratory animal administered an individual PAH in an excessive dose has little relationship to the situation where a human is exposed by a different administration route to a mixture of PAHs with various degrees of tumorigenicity plus other known antitumorigenic compounds. By year-end 1955, very few of the PAHs considered by the Pullmans had been reported as tobacco smoke components. More had been identified in other sources such as air pollution. In the following discussion, the comments in the early
61
1950s about the inadequacy of the evidence indicating the presence of B[a]P in tobacco smoke (1181) are disregarded. Table I.E-3 lists the PAHs reported in tobacco smoke at that time. Of the fourteen PAHs reported, only eight were included by the Pullmans in their assessment: naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, B[a]A, B[a]P, B[e]P, dibenzo[def,mno] chrysene, and pyrene. Of course, only one of the eight, B[a]P, was considered at that time a significant and potent tumorigen to mouse skin. At that time, the tumorigenicity of B[a]A was questioned, and still was questioned in the mid-1980s (983). As noted previously, Pullman and Pullman not only updated the electronic structure-tumorigenicity information generated after the Coulson 1953 review but also attempted to extend the theory to alkyl-PAHs. Examination of their review reveals that they discussed, in addition to 1,2-dihydro3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene, a total of twelve alkyl-PAHs (see Table I.E-3). It is obvious from their discussion that the prediction of tumorigenicity for most of these twelve PAHs was not calculated but derived from published biological data. However, examination of the biological data in Hartwell (1543, 1544) and Shubik and Hartwell (3664, 3665) indicates that at least sixty-four totally benzenoid alkyl-PAHs had been tested for tumorigenicity by 1955. Several 1,2-dihydromethylbenz[j] aceanthrylenes had been tested for tumorigenicity by 1955, but they were not included in our count of sixty-four. This raises the question: Why was the prediction not calculated for more of the sixty-four alkyl-PAHs, the tumorigenicity of which was known at that time (1543, 1544, 3664, 3665)? Pullman and Pullman noted: “It must be acknowledged that the extension of the theory to substituted derivatives of polycyclic hydrocarbons is at present far from having achieved a completely consistent and satisfactory form.” Many of the more recent theories on the relationship between PAH structural properties and tumorigenicity suffer somewhat from this and other deficiencies [see Herndon et al. (1623a, 2435a), Rubin (3365), Trosko (3966a), L. Zhang et al. (4410c), and Y. Zhang (4410d)]. Much studied in recent years has been the application of the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) method to PAHs. Although many theories have involved the relationships between observed laboratory-derived biological data on individually administered PAHs and their structural elements, do they speak to the exposure situation experienced by humans? Whether the exposure is by inhalation of air pollutants or tobacco smoke, by ingestion of foodstuffs or beverages, by dermal contact, or by a combination of the exposures, very few of any human exposures involve exposure to a single PAH similar to the exposure of laboratory animals treated with a single PAH by skin painting or subcutaneous injection. One such example of human exposure to a single PAH was the past use of naphthalene as the major ingredient in mothballs. Numerous PAHs have been either completely of partially characterized in many air pollutants, foodstuffs, beverages, and contact tars and dusts. Of all the products to which humans are exposed, none has been characterized to the extent of tobacco smoke. Over 5200 components have been identified in it, nearly twice as many as in the next consumer
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 61
11/13/08 6:42:33 PM
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
62
TABLE I.E-2 Benzenoid Hydrocarbons Discussed by Pullman and Pullman (3003) Aromatic Hydrocarbon Discussed
CAS No.
No. in Pullman and Pullman (3003)
Considered Tumorigenica in 1955
Monocyclic Benzeneb
71-43-2
I
no
Bicyclic Naphthalene
91-20-3
II
no
Tricyclic Anthracene Phenanthrene
120-12-7 85-01-8
III IV
no no
Tetracyclic Naphthacene Benz[a]anthracene Benz[a]anthracene, 2,10-dimethylBenz[a]anthracene, 7,12-dimethylBenz[a]anthracene, 7-methylBenzo[c]phenanthrene Benzo[c]phenanthrene, 1,2-dimethylChrysene Chrysene, 2,3-dimethyl- c Triphenylene Pyrene
92-24-0 56-55-3 — 57-97-6 2541-69-7 195-19-7 — 218-01-9 — 217-59-4 129-00-0
VII VI XLIII XLII XLIV V XLVIII VIII XLIX X IX
no ? ? yes yes yes no ? no no no
Pentacyclic Benzo[b]chrysene Benzo[c]chrysene Benzo[g]chrysene Pentacene Benzo[a]naphthacene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Dibenz[a,j]anthracene Pentaphene Perylene Picene Benzo[b]triphenylene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene, 2-methyl- d Benzo[a]pyrene, 3-methylBenzo[a]pyrene, 5-methylBenzo[a]pyrene, 6-methylBenzo[a]pyrene, 7-methylBenzo[a]pyrene, 8-methylBenzo[a]pyrene, 9-methylBenzo[e]pyrene Dibenzo[b,g]phenanthrene Dibenzo[c,g]phenanthrene Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl- e
214-17-5 194-69-4 196-78-1 135-48-8 226-88-0 53-70-3 224-41-9 222-93-5 198-55-0 213-46-7 215-58-7 50-32-8 — — — 2381-39-7 63041-77-0 63041-76-9 — 192-97-2 195-06-2 188-52-3 56-49-5
XXIII XIII XIV XVIII XVII XII XV XIX XXV XXI XX XI XLVII XLVII XLVII XLVII XLVII XLVII XLVII XVI XXIV XXII XLV
no yes yes no no yes yes no no no no yes yes yes yes yes yes no no no no no yes
195-00-6 222-54-8 189-55-9 189-96-8 189-64-0 217-54-9 196-28-1 191-26-4 191-30-0
XXXV XXXVII LIV LVII XXVII XXXVI LVI XXXI XXVI
no no (yes) f no yes no no no yes
Hexacyclic Anthra[1,2-a]anthracene Benzo[c]pentaphene Benzo[rst]pentaphene Benzo[pqr]picene Dibenzo[b,def]chrysene Dibenzo[b,k]chrysene Dibenzo[c,mno]chrysene Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene Dibenzo[def,p]chrysene
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 62
11/13/08 6:42:34 PM
The Hydrocarbons
63
TABLE I.E-2 (CONTINUED) Benzenoid Hydrocarbons Discussed by Pullman and Pullman (3003) Aromatic Hydrocarbon Discussed
CAS No.
No. in Pullman and Pullman (3003)
Considered Tumorigenic a in 1955
Dibenzo[a,j]naphthacene Dibenzo[a,l]naphthacene Dibenzo[fg,op]naphthacene Naphtho[1,2,3,4-def]chrysene Naphtho[2,1,8-qra]naphthacene Naphtho[1,2-b]triphenylene
227-04-3 226-86-8 192-51-8 192-65-4 196-42-9 215-26-9
XXXIII XXXIV XXIX XXVIII XXX XXXII
no no no ? no no
Heptacyclic Benzo[a]naphtho[8,1,2-lmn]naphthacene Dibenzo[fg,qr]pentacene
190-01-2 197-74-0
LV XL
no no
Octacyclic Dinaphtho[1,2-b:1,2-k]chrysene Naphthaceno[2,1,12,11-opqra]naphthacene Phenanthro[1,10,9,8-opqra]perylene
214-13-1 188-42-1 190-39-6
XXXIX LVIII XLI
no ?g no
Nonacyclic Dinaphtho[1,2-b:1,2-n] perylene
—
XXXVIII
no
Decacyclic Pentacenopentacene
—
LIX
?g
a
Tumorigenic in mouse skin-painting study. Benzene was reported as a component of the vapor phase of tobacco smoke in 1955 by Resnik and Holmes (3106) and Laurene (2293). c A dimethylchrysene was subsequently reported in tobacco smoke, but the positions of the methyl groups were not defined. d At least two methyl B[a]Ps were subsequently reported in tobacco smoke, but the position of the methyl group in each case was not defined. e This PAH is not totally benzenoid; its structure includes a cyclopentanoid ring.. f In 1955, the tumorigenicity of benzo[rst]pentaphene had not been determined; later it was reported to be tumorigenic. g Although no calculation was made on this PAH, Pullman and Pullman (3003) predicted it would be tumorigenic. b
TABLE I.E-3 Polycyclic Hydrocarbons Reported in Tobacco Smoke by Year-End 1955 References Issued in the Year Hydrocarbon Acenaphthylenea Azulenea, b Anthracene Anthracene, 2-methylBenz[a]anthracene Benzo[ghi]perylene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[e]pyrene Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene Fluoranthene a Naphthalene Naphthalene, 2-methylPhenanthrene Pyrene
1947
1953
1954
1955
818
819, 821
818
785, 819
820, 2365 2365 820, 2352, 2365, 3578 820 2352, 2425, 2426 820, 2365, 2425, 2426 55–57, 593, 1172, 2011, 2365, 3578, 4353 2352 820, 2365 820, 2365 3578 820 820, 2365 820, 2352, 2365, 2425, 2426
1857
819 785, 819, 821, 2335 819 819
818
819 785, 819
a
Molecule has a cyclopentanoid ring, thus it was not considered by Pullman and Pullman (3003).
b
Molecule does not possess a benzenoid structure.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 63
11/13/08 6:42:35 PM
64
product, coffee, subjected to detailed compositional analysis. Of the identified tobacco smoke components, about 11% were either completely or partially identified as PAHs. It should also be noted that in the detailed examination of tobacco smoke, the over 5200 identified components account for over 98% of the weight of cigarette MSS. It has been estimated, based on detailed gas chromatograms, that the number of actual components in cigarette MSS may be twelve to twenty times the number of identified ones (4103). Of the more than 500 PAHs either completely or partially identified in cigarette MSS, relatively few PAHs, originally thirteen in all, were repeatedly defined as significant tumorigens (1727, 1808, 1871). Eventually, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) redefined the tumorigenicity of chrysene. Thus, it was deleted from all subsequent lists (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 2825) except one (1217). MSS is not the only source of most of the twelve PAHs still considered as significant tumorigens in cigarette MSS. Except for 5-methylchrysene, most have also been identified as significant PAH components of gasoline and diesel engine exhaust gases (1406a, 4315) and many common foodstuffs and beverages (1345, 2438). When one is dealing with a complex mixture, which in turn contains an assortment of PAHs ranging from bicyclic to decacyclic, one cannot extrapolate the biological effect observed by administration of an individual PAH to the biological effect of that PAH in such a complex mixture. It has long been known from laboratory studies that certain nontumorigenic or slightly tumorigenic PAHs when administered by skin painting or subcutaneous injection in an equimolar dose level with a highly tumorigenic PAH partially or totally inhibit its tumorigenicity. Few studies have been done to determine the effect of a non- or low-tumorigenic PAH on the tumorigenicity of a highly tumorigenic PAH when its level greatly exceeds that of the potent tumorigen. Also, there are differences in the classification of the potency of the tumorigenicity of some PAHs. For example, B[a]A is classified by some as a potent or significant tumorigen (1871) but by others as only slightly tumorigenic (983). The list of either totally or partially identified PAHs in CSC gradually increased but in the mid-1970s the massive definitive PAH study by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) personnel in Athens, Georgia, increased the number of known PAHs in CSC to well over 500 (3732, 3756–3759). Although not isolated individually, their identifications, whether total or partial, have generally been accepted across the board. Numerous authors, including Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), listed the PAH dibenzo[a,l]pyrene as a significant tumorigen in tobacco smoke. However, Hecht eventually stated (1557) that “the presence in cigarette smoke of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, a highly carcinogenic PAH, had not been confirmed.” One should weigh the comment by Hecht against the current status of defined MSS composition. Since the appreciable decline in detailed tobacco smoke composition studies after the late 1970s, no individual investigator or no research group has reported the confirmation of the identities of
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
many of the PAHs (3756-3759), aza-arenes (3750, cf. 3414), nitrogen-containing components (1587), or ether- (2769) and water-soluble components (3553) reported in cigarette MSS in the 1970s. While many components have been confirmed by other investigators at the same institution as the authors, examination of the post-1980 literature indicates that the identities of nearly half the new components described in the above-mentioned studies have not been confirmed by investigators at other institutions. Because of such a situation, would Hecht also discount their presence in cigarette MSS in the same way as he discounted the presence of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene? Although most of the past theories have attempted to define the relationship between structural properties of the PAHs and their specific tumorigenicity as measured individually in skin-painting studies, little has been done to explain the behavior of a PAH when it is present in a complex mixture that includes a host of PAHs some of which are known antitumorigens as well as numerous known non-PAH antitumorigens (1174). It has been known for over sixty years that co-administration of a potently tumorigenic PAH with an equimolar quantity of a nontumorigenic PAH often results in substantial reduction in percent tumor bearing animals (%TBA). In 1953, Coulson noted [see p. 51 in (829)]: The action of inhibitors may be thought of as a competition between the carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic compounds for available sites on the enzyme. If sufficient noncarcinogenic molecules are able to occupy suitable sites, then the irreversible mutation cannot occur. We can see that inhibitors, in order to compete with the carcinogenic compounds, should themselves possess a K-region.
Some of the PAHs that substantially reduce or totally inhibit the tumorigenicity of several of the most potent tumorigens known are listed in Table I.E-4. Obviously, neither naphthalene nor anthracene has a K-region, a requirement proposed by Coulson for the inhibitory property. Although many of the inhibition studies were conducted with the tumorigenic and inhibiting PAHs administered in equimolar quantities, it should be remembered that this is not the case in the PAH mixture in CSC. Table I.E-5 is derived from CSC PAH data presented by Hoffmann and Wynder (1788, 1798) and Rodgman (3273). The per cigarette yield data in Table I.E-5 were the averages of the data generated from two different commercial American cigarettes. One was unfiltered and yielded 36.8 mg/cigarette of total particulate matter (TPM) (1788); the other was a filtered cigarette that yielded 37.5 mg/cigarette of TPM (3273). The disparity between the relative yields in each category was less than 5%. In the early structure-biological activity studies, PAHs with a pentacyclic ring were not included in the discussion of most theories but pentacyclic compounds in which the pentacycle contained nitrogen were, that is, benzacridines (829, 2247a). In the discussion of his theory, Coulson (829) did mention several cyclopentanoid compounds: six benzacridines and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 64
11/13/08 6:42:35 PM
The Hydrocarbons
65
TABLE I.E-4 Inhibition of Tumorigenicity of Potently Tumorigenic PAHs by Non-Tumorigenic or Weakly Tumorigenic PAHs PAH a
CAS No.
Effective Against
References
Naphthalene Anthracene Phenanthrene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[e]pyrene Benzo[b]triphenylene
91-20-3 120-12-7 85-01-8 206-44-0 129-00-0 56-55-3 192-97-2 215-58-7
B[a]P, DB[a,h]A B[a]P, DB[a,h]A DMB[a]A B[a]P, DMB[a]A DB[a,h]A, DMB[a]A B[a]P, DB[a,h]A B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, DMB[a]A MC b, DB[a,h]A, DMB[a]A
844 844 976, 3685 976, 3685, 3686 976, 3685, 3686 426, 4332 976, 3685, 3686 976, 3683, 3686
a
Each PAH listed is a component of cigarette MSS.
b
MC = 3-methylcholanthrene = 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene.
two PAHs, 2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[a]cyclopent[h]anthracene and 10,11-dihydro-9H-benzo[a]cyclopent[i]anthracene. In her 1996 thesis, Zhang (4410d) noted the numerous sources of PAHs to which humans are exposed, for example, air pollutants, foodstuffs and beverages, effluents from factories, vehicles, and heat and power sources. Zhang particularly stressed tobacco smoke, its complexity, and some of the PAHs contained therein: Tobacco smoke is a complex mixture which is estimated to contain at least 150 compounds in the gas phase and more than 2000 compounds have been identified in the particulate phase. Table 1a lists some PAHs that exist in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke.
In her Table 1, Zhang (4410d) listed nineteen MSS PAHs reported in 1978 by Hoffmann et al. (1781). Unfortunately, the inconsistent use of PAH nomenclature sometimes makes it difficult to follow the phases of the study by Zhang [see Table 7 and Appendix A in (4410d)]. Another study, initiated by Martin et al. (2479), involved an attempt to develop a meaningful relationship between PAH structure, chemical properties, and biological properties, specifically the effect of PAHs on specific tumorigenicity in skin painting. Reported for naphthalene- and pyrene-related PAHs were the following molecular parameters: the measured and calculated log of the octanol-water partition coefficient (MlogP, ClogP), molecular volume (MgVol), calculated
TABLE I.E-5 Levels of PAH Classes in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Mainstream Smoke Yielda PAH Category Bicyclic Tricyclic Tetracyclic Pentacyclic B[a]P Non-B[a]P pentacyclic Hexacyclic TOTALS
Assumed Approximate mol. wt.
Yield ng/cig
128b 178c 228 278 252 278 328
4140 (77.1)d 720 (13.4) 420 (7.9) 72 (1.3) 27 (0.49)f 45 (0.81)f 14 (0.3)
Approximate Nanomoles e 32.3 4.0 1.8 0.26 0.11 0.16 0.04
Nanomolar Ratio, PAH:B[a]P 293 36 16 2.4 1.0 1.5 0.36
5366 (100.0)
a
Data reported by Hoffmann and Wynder (1788, 1798) from a nonfiltered cigarette, total particulate matter = 36.8 mg/cig, were averaged with data reported by Rodgman and Cook (3273) for a filtered commercial cigarette, total particulate matter = 37.5 mg/cig.
b
The molecular weight of naphthalene = 128, that of indene = 116. It is realized that the average molecular weight of the bicyclic PAH mixture will differ slightly from those of the parent PAH because of the presence of numerous homologs (methylnaphthalenes, dimethylnaphthalenes, etc.).
c
The presence of tricyclic PAH homologs results in molecular weight slightly different from 178.
d
Values in parentheses represent the fraction % of the PAH category in the total PAH fraction.
e
Nanomoles calculated with the approximate molecular weights in Column 2.
f
The sum of the fraction % of B[a]P and the fraction % of non-B[a]P pentacyclic PAHs equals 1.3%.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 65
11/13/08 6:42:36 PM
66
molar refractivity (CMR), and the number of valence electrons (NVE). The second phase of the study involved similar data for anthracenes, phenanthrenes, and indenes (3300a). All PAHs in the first two phases of this study (2479, 3300a) are reported components of cigarette MSS. The ultimate goal is to use these data to facilitate a QSAR on MSS PAHs. If such a meaningful relationship can be derived for the more than 500 MSS PAHs, then it probably can be applied to any PAH from any source. As a prelude to this attempt to develop a possibly reasonable explanation for the PAH structure-tumorigenicity relationship, the PAHs completely or partially identified in cigarette smoke have been cataloged. For each PAH, the nomenclature used in Tables I.E-1, I.E-4, and I.E-5 is the most recent proposed by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). The tobacco smoke PAH references cited in Table I.E-6 are not necessarily all that are available, particularly for those PAHs such as B[a]P and DB[a,h]A that have been the subject of much research and discussion for over half a century. In most cases, included is a reference to the publication or presentation by the investigator(s) who first reported a particular PAH in MSS. References of articles and/or presentations on specific PAHs that contained evidence later criticized are included plus references to the misinterpretations or errors. The criticism by Fieser (1181) in 1957 of the shortcomings of the evidence (55–57, 592-594, 820) supposedly indicating the presence of B[a]P in cigarette smoke has already been mentioned. Two other notable situations involved 1,2-dihydrobenz[j] aceanthrylene (cholanthrene) and dibenzo[def,p]chrysene (formerly named dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, initially 1,2,3,4-dibenzopyrene). These two PAH identifications, based solely on UV spectral data, were found to be incorrect. In their study, Rodgman and Cook (3273) incorrectly defined a PAH as 1,2dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene (cholanthrene). In the massive study by USDA personnel on the identification of MSS PAHs, 1,2-dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene was not among the several benzocyclopentanthracenes reported (3756, 3759). The other incorrectly characterized PAH was dibenzo[def,p]chrysene. For its identification, not only Rodgman and Cook (3273) but also Bonnet and Neukomm (397), Lyons and Johnson (2430), Lyons (2427), Wynder and Wright (4354), and Pyriki (3033) relied on published UV spectral data purportedly those of synthetic dibenzo[def,p]chrysene (dibenzo[a,l]pyrene). However, in 1966, Lavit-Lamy and Buu-Hoï (2314) determined that the published UV spectral data were not those of dibenzo[a,l] pyrene but of the isomeric dibenz[a,e]aceanthrylene (dibenzo[a,e]fluoranthene), generated during the supposed synthesis of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene. The authentic dibenzo[def,p] chrysene (dibenzo[a,l]pyrene) was identified in MSS in 1977 (3756), but its MSS level has never been reported. Some authorities insist that the B[a]P and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in cigarette smoke are the major causes of lung cancer in cigarette smokers [Hecht (1557), Hecht and Hoffmann (1571a), Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), the World Health Organization (4279a)] despite the following:
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1. Neither B[a]P nor any other PAH in CSC either individually or in combination with the other PAHs in CSC can explain more than a few percent of the biological response observed in skin painting with CSC [Druckrey (1056), Roe (3310, 3311), Wright and Wynder (4283), Wynder (4296), Wynder and Hoffmann (4307, 4312, 4343, 4343a, 4354)]. 2. Neither B[a]P nor any other PAH in CSC either individually or in combination with the other PAHs and assorted promoters (phenols) in CSC can explain more than a few percent of the biological response observed in skin painting with CSC (4332). 3. In general, the N-nitrosamines in CSC are not tumorigenic to mouse skin but are organ-specific tumorigens [Preussmann and Stewart (2991),*] a point stressed in numerous reviews issued between the mid-1960s and the late 1990s on N-nitrosamines [Rodgman (3256)] and recognized by Hoffmann and Hecht [see p. 75 in (1727)]. 4. NNK has never been shown to induce lung cancer in a laboratory animal by inhalation (1727). While the minor contribution of B[a]P to the tumorigenicity of CSC to mouse skin has been recognized since the mid-1950s (4353, 4354), its presence in CSC has elicited continued interest since that time. Examination of the references to various smoke components reveals an interesting fact about B[a]P: When all the cigarette smoke components are tabulated with regard to similar selection of references across the board, very few tobacco smoke components exceed B[a] P in the number of pertinent references available. Obviously, the smoke component discussed most in publications and presentations between the mid-1950s and 2005 was nicotine. Next was acetaldehyde, followed by B[a]P. Another interesting fact about B[a]P is that, despite its minimal contribution to mouse-skin tumorigenicity from CSC, almost every year since the mid-1950s there has been at least one publication on a new and/or improved method to quantitate the yield of B[a]P in MSS [see Table 6 in (3306b)]. In 2004, CORESTA published its recommended method for the determination of B[a]P in tobacco smoke (825a). Much emphasis has been placed on the determination of B[a]P in the MSS from fewer and fewer cigarettes. Before the advent of all the newly introduced and subsequently improved spectral and chromatographic systems, estimations of individual PAHs required the CSC from many cigarettes. For example, in their studies on the effect of various treatments of tobacco on the PAHs in MSS, Rodgman and Cook (3241, 3246, 3269, 3274, 3275) chemically analyzed the MSS from 3600 cigarettes for each control and treated sample. For the MSS PAH *
Subsequent to the publication of the Preussmann and Stewart review (2991), Deutsch-Wenzel et al. (956a) reported that in a skin-painting study with N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), tumors were initiated at the site of application. The specific tumorigenic potency of NNN was estimated to be only 0.8% of that of B[a]P. However, no dose response relationship was observed with NNN over a treatment range of 12.5 to 200 μg.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 66
11/13/08 6:42:37 PM
The Hydrocarbons
67
TABLE I.E-6 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 67
11/13/08 6:42:40 PM
68
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 68
11/13/08 6:42:42 PM
The Hydrocarbons
69
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 69
11/13/08 6:42:44 PM
70
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 70
11/13/08 6:42:47 PM
The Hydrocarbons
71
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 71
11/13/08 6:42:49 PM
72
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 72
11/13/08 6:42:51 PM
The Hydrocarbons
73
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 73
11/13/08 6:42:54 PM
74
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 74
11/13/08 6:42:57 PM
The Hydrocarbons
75
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 75
11/13/08 6:42:59 PM
76
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 76
11/13/08 6:43:01 PM
The Hydrocarbons
77
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 77
11/13/08 6:43:04 PM
78
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 78
11/13/08 6:43:07 PM
The Hydrocarbons
79
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 79
11/13/08 6:43:09 PM
80
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 80
11/13/08 6:43:11 PM
The Hydrocarbons
81
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 81
11/13/08 6:43:14 PM
82
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 82
11/13/08 6:43:16 PM
The Hydrocarbons
83
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 83
11/13/08 6:43:19 PM
84
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 84
11/13/08 6:43:23 PM
The Hydrocarbons
85
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 85
11/13/08 6:43:26 PM
86
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 86
11/13/08 6:43:29 PM
The Hydrocarbons
87
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 87
11/13/08 6:43:31 PM
88
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 88
11/13/08 6:43:34 PM
The Hydrocarbons
89
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 89
11/13/08 6:43:36 PM
90
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 90
11/13/08 6:43:39 PM
The Hydrocarbons
91
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 91
11/13/08 6:43:42 PM
92
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 92
11/13/08 6:43:44 PM
The Hydrocarbons
93
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 93
11/13/08 6:43:47 PM
94
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 94
11/13/08 7:09:20 PM
The Hydrocarbons
95
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 95
11/13/08 6:43:54 PM
96
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 96
11/13/08 6:43:56 PM
The Hydrocarbons
97
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 97
11/13/08 6:43:58 PM
98
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 98
11/13/08 6:44:01 PM
The Hydrocarbons
99
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 99
11/13/08 6:44:03 PM
100
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 100
11/13/08 6:44:05 PM
The Hydrocarbons
101
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 101
11/13/08 6:44:08 PM
102
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
TABLE I.E-6 (CONTINUED) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
analyses in the fifty treated and control samples described in (3246), more than 183000 cigarettes were smoked, the condensate collected, and processed. Nowadays, only a few cigarettes are needed for similar analyses. To permit comparison of the chemical data with the biological findings of Wynder et al. (4306a), the smoking procedure used by them was initially duplicated in the Rodgman-Cook studies in the 1950s, that is, the cigarettes on a manifold were machine smoked (35-ml puff volume, 2-sec puff duration, 3 puffs/min) with a collection system that duplicated the one described by Wynder et al. (4306a). This smoking regime differed from the usual 35-ml puff volume, 2-sec puff duration, 1 puff/min described by Bradford et al. (423b) in 1936 and used by most investigators in smoke studies after that date. Table I.E-7 summarizes the PAHs identified in CSC that were included in earlier descriptions of proposed structuretumorigenicity theories. Examination of Table I.E-7 indicates that most of the PAHs considered in the various theoretical systems designed to establish a relationship between molecular structure and tumorigenicity are totally benzenoid. Only a few PAHs with a combined benzenoid-cyclopentanoid structure were included in the early studies. Lacassagne et al. (2247a) in their discourse on structure-tumorigenicity relationship mentioned a few benzenoid PAHs but their major emphasis was on the structure-tumorigenicity relationship of
numerous angular benzacridines. While the number of azaarenes, including the benzacridines, in CSC is less than the number of PAHs, nearly 200 have been identified, many by the USDA group at Athens, Georgia (3750). With the knowledge that CSC contains nontumorigenic PAHs that have been shown to substantially reduce the tumorigenicity of several potently tumorigenic PAHs, consideration of the study of Lacassagne et al. raises several interesting questions with regard to tobacco smoke composition. (1) Do any of the benzacridines or other aza-arenes in CSC partially or totally inhibit the tumorigenicity of the tumorigenic benzacridines or other aza-arenes? (2) Do any of the benzacridines inhibit the tumorigenicity of tumorigenic PAHs? (3) Do any of the PAHs reduce the tumorigenicity of the tumorigenic aza-arenes? The mixture known as CSC is so complex that it is not possible to ascribe its biological activity to any individual component because of the known behavior of that component when administered individually.
I.F SUMMARY Detailed examination of the lists presented in the five sections on hydrocarbons indicates that over 1200 hydrocarbons have been identified to date in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The data are summarized in Table I.E-8.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 102
11/13/08 6:44:10 PM
PAH Discussed Acenaphthylene Acenaphthylene, 1,2-dihydroAnthracene Anthracene, dimethyl- a Anthracene, 9,10dimethylAnthracene, 1-methylAnthracene, 2-methylAnthracene, 9-methylAnthracene, trimethylAzulene Benz[a]aceanthrylene Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydroBenz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methylBenz[e]acephenanthrylene Benz[e]acephenanthrylene, methylBenz[a]anthracene Benz[a]anthracene, dimethyl- a Benz[a]anthracene, 7,12-dimethylBenz[a]anthracene, ethylBenz[a]anthracene, 1-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 2-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 3-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 4-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 5-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 6-methyl-
Coulson (829)
Fieser et al. (1180a)
Herndon (1623a, 2435a)
Lacassagne et al. (2247a)
Martin et al. (2479)
PullmanPullman (3003)
Rubin (3365)
Trosko-Upham (3966a)
Zhang et al. (4410c)
Y. Zhang (4410d)
— —
— —
X —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
X X
X — —
X — —
X — —
— — —
— — —
X — —
— — —
X X [1] —
X — X
X X [5] X
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
— — — — X X —
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
— — — — X — —
— — — — — — —
X X — — — — —
— — — — — — X
— — X X [1] — X X
—
—
—
X
—
X
X
X
X
— —
— —
X —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
X —
X X [6]
X X [8] c
X —
— —
X —
— —
X —
— —
— —
— X [6]
X X [23]
X
—
—
X
—
X
X
X
X
X
— X
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
X [1] —
— X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
103
11/13/08 6:44:12 PM
(Continued)
The Hydrocarbons
78836_C001.indd 103
TABLE I.E-7 Tobacco Smoke PAHs Discussed in Various Publications on the Relationship Between PAH Structure and Tumorigenicity
104
78836_C001.indd 104
TABLE I.E-7 (CONTINUED) Tobacco Smoke PAHs Discussed in Various Publications on the Relationship Between PAH Structure and Tumorigenicity
PAH Discussed
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Herndon (1623a, 2435a)
Lacassagne et al. (2247a)
Martin et al. (2479)
PullmanPullman (3003)
Rubin (3365)
Trosko-Upham (3966a)
Zhang et al. (4410c)
Y. Zhang (4410d)
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
X
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
X
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X [1]
—
X [1]
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X [2]
—
X [3]
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X [3]
X [13]
— X
— —
X —
— —
— —
X —
— —
— —
— —
X —
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
X X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
— — —
— — —
— X —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
X — —
X X X [3]
— — — — — X X [4]
— — — — — — —
— X X — X X —
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
— X — — — X —
— — X — — — —
— — — — — — —
— — X — X X X [6]
X X X — X X X [6]
— —
— —
— X
— —
— X
— X
— X
— X
X X
— X
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
11/13/08 6:44:13 PM
Benz[a]anthracene, 8-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 9-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 10-methylBenz[a]anthracene, 12-methylBenz[a]anthracene, propylBenz[a]anthracene, tetramethylBenz[a]anthracene, trimethylBenzo[b]chrysene 1H-Benzo[a]cyclopent[h] anthracene, 2,3-dihydro9H-Benzo[a]cyclopent[i] anthracene, 10,11dihydroBenzo[ghi]fluoranthene Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, 2-methylBenzo[ghi]fluoranthene, 3-methylBenzo[j]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene, methyl7H-Benzo[c]fluorene Benzo[a]naphthacene Benzo[rst]pentaphene Benzoperylene Benzo[ghi]perylene Benzo[c]phenanthrene Benzo[c]phenanthrene, methylBenzopyrene d Benzo[a]pyrene
Coulson (829)
Fieser et al. (1180a)
13H-Dibenzo[a,i]fluorene Dibenzo[a,j]naphthacene Dibenzo[de,qr] naphthacene Dibenzo[fg,op] naphthacene Dibenzopyrene Fluoranthene Fluoranthene, 2-methylFluoranthene, 3-methyl-
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
X [9]
— —
— —
— —
— —
X X
— —
— —
— —
— —
X [1] —
— — — — — — —
— — — — — — —
X — — — X — —
— — — — — — —
X X X X — X X
X — — — X — —
X — — — X — —
X — — — — — —
X — — — X — —
X — X [12] — X — —
X — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
X — — — — — — — X —
X — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
X X [1] — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
X — — — — — — — — —
X X [1] — X X X X X X —
X X [10] X X X X X X X X
— — X X — —
— — X — — —
— X X X X X
— — X — — —
X — — — — —
— — X X X X
— — X — — —
— — — — — —
— — X X X —
— X X X X X
— — — —
— — — —
X — — X
— — — —
— — — —
X — X —
— — — —
— — — —
X — — —
X X — —
—
—
X
—
X
X
—
—
—
X
— — — —
— — — —
— X — —
— — — —
X — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— X X X
11/13/08 6:44:14 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
105
(Continued)
The Hydrocarbons
78836_C001.indd 105
Benzo[a]pyrene, 7,8-dihydroBenzo[a]pyrene, dimethyl- a Benzo[a]pyrene, methyl- b 3H-Benzo[cd]pyrene, 4,5-dihydroBenzo[e]pyrene Benzo[e]pyrene, dimethylBenzo[e]pyrene, methylBenzo[e]pyrene, trimethylBenzo[b]triphenylene 1,1’-Binaphthalene 1,1’-Binaphthalene, methylChrysene Chrysene, dimethyl- a Chrysene, 1-methylChrysene, 2-methylChrysene, 3-methylChrysene, 4-methylChrysene, 5-methylChrysene, 6-methylCoronene 4H-Cyclopenta[def] chrysene Cyclopenta[cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,e]aceanthrylene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Dibenz[a,j]anthracene Dibenzo[b,def]chrysene Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene Dibenzo[def,p]chrysene
106
78836_C001.indd 106
TABLE I.E-7 (CONTINUED) Tobacco Smoke PAHs Discussed in Various Publications on the Relationship Between PAH Structure and Tumorigenicity
PAH Discussed
11/13/08 6:44:15 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Herndon (1623a, 2435a)
Lacassagne et al. (2247a)
Martin et al. (2479)
PullmanPullman (3003)
Rubin (3365)
Trosko-Upham (3966a)
Zhang et al. (4410c)
Y. Zhang (4410d)
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — X X
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — X —
X X X X —
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
X X — —
— X — —
— X — —
— X — —
— X X X
X X — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
X X — —
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
X X
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Fluoranthene, 7-methylFluoranthene, 8-methyl9H-Fluorene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dimethylIndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, methylNaphthacene Naphthalene Naphthalene, dihydroNaphthalene, dihydromethylNaphthalene, 1,2-dihydro3-methylNaphthalene, 1,2-dihydro1,1,6-trimethylNaphthalene, 1,2-dihydro1,5,8-trimethylNaphthalene, dimethylNaphthalene, 1,2-dimethylNaphthalene, 1,3-dimethylNaphthalene, 1,4-dimethylNaphthalene, 1,5-dimethylNaphthalene, 1,6-dimethylNaphthalene, 1,7-dimethylNaphthalene, 1,8-dimethylNaphthalene, 2,3-dimethylNaphthalene, 2,6-dimethyl-
Coulson (829)
Fieser et al. (1180a)
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
X X X
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
X X X X
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
X X X X X
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
107
11/13/08 6:44:16 PM
(Continued)
The Hydrocarbons
78836_C001.indd 107
Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethylNaphthalene, dimethyl2-ethenylNaphthalene, dimethylethylNaphthalene, dimethyl2-phenylNaphthalene, dimethyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroNaphthalene, 1-ethenylNaphthalene, 2-ethenylNaphthalene, 2-ethenylmethylNaphthalene, 1-ethylNaphthalene, 2-ethylNaphthalene, ethylmethylNaphthalene, 1-ethyl3-methylNaphthalene, 1-ethyl7-methylNaphthalene, 1-ethyl8-methylNaphthalene, 2-ethyl3-methylNaphthalene, 2-ethyl6-methylNaphthalene, 2-ethyl7-methylNaphthalene, hexamethylNaphthalene, methylNaphthalene, 1-methylNaphthalene, 2-methylNaphthalene, (1-methylethyl)Naphthalene, methylphenylNaphthalene, methyl2-phenylNaphthalene, 1-(1methylpropyl)Naphthalene, methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydroNaphthalene, 2-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
108
78836_C001.indd 108
TABLE I.E-7 (CONTINUED) Tobacco Smoke PAHs Discussed in Various Publications on the Relationship Between PAH Structure and Tumorigenicity
PAH Discussed
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Herndon (1623a, 2435a)
Lacassagne et al. (2247a)
Martin et al. (2479)
PullmanPullman (3003)
Rubin (3365)
Trosko-Upham (3966a)
Zhang et al. (4410c)
Y. Zhang (4410d)
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
X X X X X X
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
X X X
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
X
—
—
X
—
—
X
X
—
—
X
—
—
X
—
—
—
X
—
—
X
—
—
X
—
—
—
X
— — X — X — — — — X —
— — — — X — — — — — —
X X — X X — — — — X —
— — — — X — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — X X
— X X X X — — — X X —
— — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — X — X — — X —
X X — — X X [1] — X [1] — — —
— X X X X — — — — X —
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
11/13/08 6:44:17 PM
Naphthalene, pentamethylNaphthalene, 1-phenylNaphthalene, 2-phenylNaphthalene, 1-propylNaphthalene, 2-propylNaphthalene, 1,2,3,4tetrahydro-1,1,6trimethylNaphthalene, tetramethylNaphthalene, trimethylNaphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylNaphthalene, 1,2,6-trimethylNaphthalene, 1,3,6-trimethylNaphthalene, 1,4,5-trimethylNaphthalene, 1,6,7-trimethylNaphthalene, 2,3,6-trimethylNaphtho[1,2,3,4-def] chrysene Naphtho[2,1,8-qra] naphthacene Naphtho[1,2-b] triphenylene Ovalene Pentacene Pentaphene Perylene Phenanthrene Phenanthrene, dimethylPhenanthrene, methylPhenanthrene, tetramethylPicene Pyrene Pyrene, dihydro-
Coulson (829)
Fieser et al. (1180a)
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — —
X X X X X X X X X X X —
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — X
— — — — — X X X — — — —
X —
— —
X —
— —
— —
X —
— —
X —
X —
X X [1]
The Hydrocarbons
78836_C001.indd 109
Pyrene, dimethylPyrene, 3,4-dimethylenePyrene, hexamethylPyrene, 1-hexylPyrene, methylPyrene, 1-methylPyrene, 2-methylPyrene, 4-methylPyrene, pentamethylPyrene, tetramethylPyrene, trimethyl5H-Tribenzo[a,f,l]trindene, 10,15-dihydroTriphenylene Triphenylene, methyla
The positions of the two methyl groups were not specified. The position of the methyl group was not specified. c Number in square brackets indicates the number of isomers included in the study. d The nature of the benzopyrene was not specified. b
109
11/13/08 6:44:18 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
110
TAble I.e-8 Distribution of Identified hydrocarbons between Tobacco and Tobacco smoke number of Identified hydrocarbons in Tobacco and Tobacco smoke hydrocarbon Alkanes Alkenes and alkynes Alicyclics Monocyclic aromatic Polycyclic aromatic
Table
Total
smoke
Tobacco
Table I.A-10 Table I.B-1 Table I.C-1 Table I.D-1 Table I.E-6
132 363 142 98 586a
111 347 95 89 575a
96 42 61 39 86
75 25 16 30 74
1321
1217
324
220
Totals a
smoke and Tobacco
This number includes the various isomers of alkyl-PAHs reported in which the position of the alkyl group or groups has not been precisely defined.
It is obvious from the tabulation that the PAHs represent nearly 44% of the hydrocarbons identified to date and a substantial number of them are smoke components. The one category in the PAHs that is found to an appreciable extent in a particular type of tobacco, Latakia tobacco, is the bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbon naphthalene and its homologs (1135, 2784). The few remaining PAHs present in both tobacco and
its smoke include several tricyclic, tetracyclic, and pentacyclic PAHs, for example, anthracene, phenanthrene, pyrene, and B[a]P. As a result of the study by Bentley and Burgan (285) in the early days of the concern about B[a]P in tobacco smoke and its origin, the presence of B[a]P and the other PAHs in tobacco is usually attributed to its contamination by pollutants during transportation, curing, etc.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C001.indd 110
11/13/08 6:44:18 PM
2
Alcohols and Phytosterols
II.A Alcohols Periodically, tobacco researchers have reported the progress on the identification of tobacco and smoke components. Review articles by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) and Izawa (1900) detailed much of the tobacco and smoke research conducted over the preceding century. Izawa listed 440 identified smoke components by 1961. The next year, Quin (3059) published a review of components found in tobacco and smoke. Herrmann (1625) reviewed phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke. In 1963, Philip Morris (2939) published a monograph on tobacco and smoke composition, a copy of which was provided the Advisory Committee on smoking and health to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999). In 1964, Elmenhorst and Reckzeh (1139) tabulated the aromatic hydrocarbons identified in tobacco smoke. Kuhn (2228, 2229) published articles on alkaloids in tobacco and their pyrolysis products in smoke. In their 1967 book, Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) discussed tobacco and smoke chemistry and the results of animal studies with tobacco smoke. Elmenhorst and Schultz (1140) listed 250 low-boiling components and vapor-phase components identified in tobacco smoke. In his 1968 review, Stedman (3797) listed nearly 1200 identified tobacco and smoke components. The next year, Neurath (2724) reported on the presence of 180 N-containing compounds in smoke. With the meaningful advancements in analytical methodology, the number of identified tobacco and smoke components increased dramatically (1373). In an in-house catalog assembled at R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) in 1975, Roberts et al. (3224) listed 2783 identified components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. During the mid-1970s at RJRT, Schumacher et al. (3553), Heckman and Best (1587), and Newell et al. (2769) identified over 1540 compounds in the water-soluble and ether-soluble fractions of tobacco smoke. Of these, over 820 compounds were newly reported as tobacco smoke components. In 1977, Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) cataloged nearly 500 N-containing compounds identified in tobacco smoke but their catalog did not include the more than 230 N-containing compounds newly identified in tobacco smoke by Heckman and Best (1587). Between 1974 and 1978, Snook et al. (3756–3758) published the results of their massive study of the PAHs and a number of benzofurans identified in tobacco smoke, a study that was followed by an equally definitive one on the identification of aza-arenes and monocyclic N-containing compounds in tobacco smoke (3750). In 1980, Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed 1889 identified tobacco smoke components in their monograph. However, a tally of the tobacco smoke components reported at that time exceeded 2500. No additional catalogs of the total number of identified components
of cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) have been published since the 1980 Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) publication. Smith et al. (3712) recently reported the chemical structures of the 253 identified phenols reported in cigarette MSS. In the past, different authors had different views on the classification of alcohols in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In our catalog, we employ a system different from those used by our forerunners. In 1954, Kosak (2170), in his smoke component compilation, listed seven “alcohols”: four alcohols (methanol, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and ethylene glycol) and three phenols (phenol, “phenols,” and catechol). He did not list either levoglucosan or a “phytosterol” as an alcohol but listed both as miscellaneous smoke components. In 1959, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed thirteen alcohols plus five phytosterols identified in tobacco and/or smoke. In his 1968 review, Stedman (3797) divided the alcohols into three categories, namely, alcohols, sterols, and oxygenated isoprenoid constituents. The latter category contained constituents other than those with an alcoholic hydroxyl group, for example, farnesyl acetone (a ketone), solanachromene (a phenol), the tocopherols (phenols), and the levantanolides and levantenolide (ether-lactone combinations). In the category usually considered alcohols, Stedman listed a total of twenty-five alcohols (fifteen aliphatic, two aromatic, five polyols, and three cyclic). In our catalog, we have considered three types of components with hydroxyl groups: (1) components with a carboxyl group and its hydroxyl group (discussed in Chapter IV), (2) components with an hydroxyl group attached to a monocyclic or polycyclic benzenoid nucleus, that is, a phenol (discussed in Chapter IX), and (3) an hydroxyl group attached to a saturated or unsaturated aliphatic, alicyclic, or nonbenzenoid nucleus, which may or may not include another functional entity. An example of category (3) is the first item in Table II.A-1, hydroxyacetaldehyde (glycolaldehyde), which is both an alcohol and aldehyde. The saturated aliphatic alcohols range from methanol to 1-triacontanol with alkyl homologs included in some cases, for example, 1-butanol and 2-methyl1-propanol. The unsaturated aliphatic alcohols include 2-propen-1-ol (allyl alcohol) and such terpenoid structures as the C10 alcohol 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-ol (linalool), the C20 alcohol 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol (phytol), and the C45 alcohol 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl-2, 6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-hexatriacontanonaen-1-ol (solanesol). Examples of the alicyclic alcohols range from cyclopentanol to various carotenediols and triols to numerous cyclotetradecadienols, diols, and triols. Other alicyclic alcohols include a great variety of carbohydrates such as glucose and fructose plus the cases where such carbohydrates are linked to another component such as a phytosterol to form a glycoside. 111
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 111
11/13/08 4:59:17 PM
112
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table II.A-1 Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Identified by Classical Chemical Methods Year
Investigator (Reference)
1953 1956 1956 1956 1957 1958 1958 1958 1959 1959 1959 1959 1959 1960 1960 1960 1962 1962 1962 1962 1964 1965
Sasaki (3413) Rowland et al. (3359) Rowland (3345) Rowland (3347) Kosak et al. (2178) Kosak and Swinehart (2175) Philippe and Hackney (2941) Wender et al. (4164) Dieterman et al. (969) Dymicky and Stedman (1082) Gladding et al. (1307) Rodgman and Cook (3271) Kobashi and Sakaguchi (2145) Carruthers and Johnstone (614) Schumacher (3535) Yang et al. (4376) Roberts and Rowland (3221) Cook and Rodgman (801) Rodgman and Cook (3280) Yang and Wender (4378) Philippe and Honeycutt (2943) Zane et al. (4402)
Component(s) Identified 2,3-Butanedione Solanesol Neophytadiene α-Tocopherol, solanachromene Stigmasterol Squalene Nitrous oxide, methyl nitrite Scopoletin Esculetin Campesterol Neophytadiene α-Tocopherol Glucose, fructose, arabinose, xylose Docosanol, solanesol β-D-Glucopyranose, 6-acetate 2,3,4-tris((+)-3-methylpentanoate) Caffeic acid α- and β-4,8,13-Duvatriene1,3-diol α- and β-Levantenolide Eugenol, isoeugenol Protocatechuic acid, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural Methyl isocyanate 4-O-Caffeoylquinic acid
With our method of defining an alcohol in tobacco and/ or smoke, the alcohols number over 1400. We realize that some readers may disagree with our classification of several hydroxypyridines as alcohols but the ones listed appear not only in this chapter, but also appear in Chapter XVII.B, in which monocyclic N-containing six-membered ring compounds are described and cataloged. Present analytical technology to identify a component in a complex mixture such as tobacco smoke or a tobacco extract involves the generation of a variety of spectra from which the compound may be characterized. The spectra may include separation of the component from the mixture by glass capillary gas chromatography, its retention time, plus those generated by ultraviolet, infrared, nuclear magnetic resonance, and mass spectroscopy studies. Nowadays, seldom is the component in the complex isolated in a tangible amount. In the early days, the study of the composition of tobacco was accomplished by so-called classical chemical procedures. The following example illustrates how an isolated terpenoid alcohol was subsequently characterized: Ozonization of the compound followed by degradation of the ozonide and derivatization of the degradation products with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine yielded the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones of the compounds shown in Figure II.A-1: Glycolic aldehyde (hydroxyacetaldehyde) {II}, levulinaldehyde (4-oxopentanal) {III}, and acetone (2-propanone) {IV}. These findings led to the assignment in 1956 of the structure {I}in Figure 11.A-1 by Rowland et al. (3359) to the terpenoid alcohol they named solanesol.
Smoke
Tobacco
+ — — — + + — + — — + + + — — + — + + + + —
— + + + — — + — + + + — — + + — + — — — — +
In the mid-1950s, the determination of the molecular weight of compounds with a molecular weight above 300 to 400 was difficult and often inaccurate. As a result, Rowland et al. were unable to precisely define the molecular weight of solanesol and therefore its structure. Originally, they had intended to report that solanesol was either a C45 compound (I, n = 8 in Figure II.A-1) or a C50 compound (I, n = 9 in Figure II.A-1) but were forced to choose one or the other. Because the majority of known isoprenoids at that time were terpenoids, that is, multiples of C10, and relatively few were sesquiterpenoids, that is, multiples of C15, Rowland et al. elected to report solanesol as a pentaterpenoid, that is, a C50 compound. In 1957, Mold and Booth (2590) reported the identification of solanesol in cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS). Subsequently, with more advanced analytical technology, Erickson et al. (2A01)) and Shunk et al. (2A03) reported in back-to-back publications in 1959 that a more precise
CH3
CH3
HOCH2-CH=C-CH2-CH2-CH=C-CH3 n I HOCH2-CH=O
H3C-CO-CH2-CH2-CH=O
II
III
H3C-CO-CH3 IV
Figure II.A-1 The degradation products from ozonized solanesol.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 112
11/13/08 4:59:19 PM
113
Alcohols and Phytosterols
molecular weight method indicated that solanesol was a C45 compound (I, n = 8 in Figure II.A-1) with the formula C45H74O (molecular weight, 630), 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-hexatriacontanonaen-1-ol. Since its characterization in 1956, solanesol has had an interesting history as a tobacco component. It is present:
1. In the different types of tobacco (flue-cured, burley, Oriental, Maryland) (3295) 2. In the smoke from each when smoked in cigarette form (2559, 3270, 3295) 3. As a variety of esters in tobacco [Rowland and Latimer (3358)] and tobacco smoke [Rodgman and Cook (3270), Rodgman et al. (3286)]
It generates isoprene [Gil-Av and Shabtai (1286); Grossman et al. (1431, 1432)], several solanesenes [Rodgman et al. (3297)], and numerous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [Rodgman and Cook (3269), Severson et al. (3616)] during the smoking process. It was proposed by Wright (4282) as a more significant precursor in tobacco of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in MSS than the aliphatic long-chained hydrocarbons, and eventually was found to be such by Rodgman and Cook (3269) and Severson et al. (3616). More recently solanesol was studied as an indicator of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in room space [Ogden (2829), Ogden and Maiola (2833, 2834), Robinson et al. (3230), Tang et al. (3868)]. In the early tobacco and tobacco smoke studies, the chemical nature of one or two components was defined by means of classical chemical procedures and described in an appropriate publication, for example, the identification of the previously discussed terpenoid alcohol solanesol in flue-cured tobacco (3359), the phenols eugenol and isoeugenol identified in the mainstream smoke (MSS) from Oriental tobacco (3280), and
maltol identified in the MSS from an ingredient-free German tobacco blend (1131). A random selection of several of these early studies is presented in Table II.A-1. However, as analytical methodology became more sophisticated and precise, many more components—sometimes several hundred newly identified in tobacco or smoke—were reported in a single publication. In his pioneer research on glass capillary gas chromatography in 1965, Grob (1416), in his study of the MSS from cigarettes containing additivefree tobacco, identified sixty-three components, a number of which were polar components. Later, some of the polar components in MSS identified by Grob are also listed in the Doull et al. catalog of cigarette flavor ingredients (1053). In the 1950s, the organic solvent extraction of tobacco was studied extensively with the purpose of removing PAH precursors from the tobacco. Incorporated into one process was an aqueous alcohol-hexane partition to separate the polar, more flavorful tobacco components from the lipophilic PAH precursors. At that time, almost nothing was known about the nature of the polar tobacco components, although it was apparent they made a considerable positive contribution to the flavor and aroma of cigarette MSS. Despite the lack of knowledge about the precise nature of the polar components, it was demonstrated they were not significant PAH precursors (3262). Our inability at that time to separate highly polar compounds in a complex mixture contributed to our lack of knowledge of the nature of the polar components in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. This situation continued during years of intensive effort on cigarette MSS composition but was finally resolved and utilized by Schumacher et al. (3553) in the 1970s. Of the total of 1545 MSS components identified by Schumacher et al. (3553), Newell et al. (2769), and Heckman and Best (1587), 828 (53.6%) were new to the tobacco smoke literature at the time of the publication and a great number of them were highly polar compounds (see Table II.A-2).
Table II.A-2 Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Studies in Which Components Were Identified by a Combination of Spectral Technologies Year
Investigator (Reference)
1965 1973/74 1974/76 b 1974/77 1975 1976 1977 1978 1978 1982/82 2004 2005
Grob (1416) Schumacher and Vestal (3561) Lloyd et al. (2389) Schumacher et al. (3553) Newell et al. (2769) Snook et al. (3758) Snook et al. (3756) Snook et al. (3757) Heckman and Best (1587) Schumacher (3550) Peng et al. (2917a) Leffingwell and Alford (2339a)
No. of Identified Components
Smoke
Tobacco
Newa
63 118 323 479 643 115 157 536 423 97 408 334
+ — — + + + + + + — — —
— + + — — — — — — + + +
27 25 132 387 173 NIc NI NI 268 1 NI 49
Newly reported components to tobacco and/or smoke at the date of the publication. The first date is that of a scientific conference presentation, the second is that of a publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. c NI = not indicated was the number of components not previously identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke. a
b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 113
11/13/08 4:59:22 PM
114
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
With regard to tobacco components, Lloyd et al. (2389) identified 275 previously unidentified components of additive-free flue-cured tobacco, 132 new to all additive-free tobacco types. Many of these compounds were highly polar and considered significant contributors to MSS flavor and aroma. Similar detailed studies were conducted on the composition of burley tobacco by Roberts and Rohde (3219), Oriental tobacco by Schumacher and Vestal (3561), and Maryland tobacco by Schumacher (3550). Years later, it became apparent that many of the highly polar components of tobacco and tobacco smoke were identical with similar to many of the components used in the flavor formulations, that is, the “top dressing,” added to a specific tobacco blend to impart its unique smoking characteristics (1053). Randomly selected publications on the identification of many additivefree tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components are listed in Table II.A-2. The description of the isolation and/or identification of a great number of tobacco and/or smoke components was not always the case even after the development of sophisticated analytical technologies that generated informative spectral data. Between the early 1970s and the late 1980s, the research group at the Swedish Tobacco Company in Stockholm, Sweden, generated a great number of publications on fluecured and Oriental tobacco composition in many of which only a single component or a few newly identified tobacco components were described. Admittedly, much attention was paid to the definition of the stereoisomerism of some of the components described individually. Selected examples of their extensive study of tobacco composition are presented in Table II.A-3. Periodically between the mid-1970s and late 1980s, the Swedish Tobacco Company group published excellent reviews of their tobacco component studies and other meaningful related studies in the scientific literature, for example, Enzell (1149, 1149a), Enzell and Wahlberg (1156), Enzell et al. (1157), Wahlberg and Eklund (4086a), and Wahlberg and Enzell (4089, 4090).
In addition to his isolation of the alcohol solanesol and contribution to its characterization, Rowland was involved in the isolation and characterization of the hydroxylated flue-cured tobacco components solanachromene and α-tocopherol, each of which is a phenol. The solanachromene has not been identified in tobacco smoke but α-tocopherol, a well-known anticarcinogen, was identified as a cigarette MSS component in 1959 (3271) and many times since in MSS and ETS, for example, see Risner (3170). In their 1962–1963 study of hydroxylated tobacco components, Rowland and colleagues next isolated several 1,3- and 1,5-diols from tobacco. Structurally, these diols were shown to be related to the alicyclic diterpenoid hydrocarbon cembrene, previously isolated in 1951 from plant tissue by Haagen-Smit et al. (2A02) and characterized in 1962 as 3,7,11-trimethyl-14(1-methylethyl)-1,3,6,10-cyclotetradecatetraene (see {V} in Figure II.A-2) by Dauben et al. (905a). The 1,3-diol and 1,5-diol isolates were demonstrated to possess the cyclotetradecatriene structures shown as {VI} and {VII}, respectively, in Figure II.A-2 [Rowland (3351, 3352), Rowland and Roberts (3360)]. Additional studies indicated the presence in tobacco not only of the diols {VI} and {VII} but also the two oxabicyclo compounds {VIII} and {IX} derived from the 1,5-diol {VII}. A third oxabicyclo type {X} was eventually identified in tobacco (9, 12, 4089–4091). The four compounds {VI} to {IX} were reported by Rowland et al. to be present in cigarette MSS (3361). Cembrene {V} was eventually identified in 1966 in tobacco by Reid (1097a) and in Japanese tobacco in 1980 by Takagi et al. (3853). The reports of these cyclotetradecatrienediols and their ethers by Rowland, Roberts, and their colleagues led to an intensive study of tobacco by the Swedish Tobacco Company research team. Their study involved the isolation, characterization, and stereochemical definition of nearly 100 compounds containing the 14-carbon ring [Aasen et al. (12), Arndt et al. (94a), Behr et al. (235, 236), Wahlberg et al. (4083–4085, 4091, 4098–4100), Wahlberg and Eklund (4086a, 4088), Wahlberg and Enzell (4091)].
Table II.A-3 Tobacco Components Identified Post-1975 Year
Investigator (Reference)
1971 1971 1974 1975 1977 1977 1978 1979 1982 1983 1983 1984 1986
Aasen et al. (9a) Enzell et al. (1155) Aasen et al. (6) Aasen et al. (1) Behr et al. (230) Behr et al. (231) Behr et al. (229) Behr et al. (234) Wahlberg et al. (4084) Wahlberg et al. (4087) Wahlberg et al. (4098) Wahlberg et al. (4083) Wahlberg et al. (4102)
Components Identified 5-Methoxy-6,7-dimethylbenzofuran Norsolanesene (9R)-9-Hydroxy-4-megastigmen-3-one, 5,6-Epoxy-3-hydroxy-7-megastigmen-9-one (2 isomers) 3,3-Dimethyl-7-hydroxy-2-octanone 2,6-Dimethyl-10-oxo-3,6-undecadien-2-ol, 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-nonen-8-ol 2,6-Dimethyl-2,7-octadiene-1,6-diol 5,8-Epoxy-6-megastigmene-3,9-diol, 3,6-epoxy-7-megastigmene-5,9-diol 8,11-Epoxy-2,6-cembradiene-4,12-diol 7,8-Epoxy-4-basmen-6-one Hydroperoxycembratrienediols [5 in all] Cembratrienols [6 in all] A new sucrose ester
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 114
11/13/08 4:59:23 PM
115
Alcohols and Phytosterols
H3C 1
14
11
3
10
H3C
9
11 6
8
7
10
CH3
7
5 V
H2C
CH3
11
9
8 1
O
3
4
1 2
3
10 CH3
123
13
CH3
CH3
H 3C HO
11
12
9
8 O
CH3
VIII 1,5-Dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1methylethyl)-15oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6dien-5-ol
1
4
5
OH
3
4
OH
VII
CH3
OH 5
7 2
6
2
1
CH3
H3C
6
10
9 14
7
1,5,11-Trimethyl-8-(1methylethyl)- 2,6,11cyclotetradecatriene-1,5-diol
CH3
H3C
8
11
1,5,9-Trimethyl-12-(1methylethyl)- 4,8,13cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol
OH 5
7 2
OH
OH
VI
6
10
5
13 4
CH3
3,7,11-Trimethyl-14-(1methylethyl)-1,3,6,10cyclotetradecatetraene {cembrene} H3C
12
CH3
3
IX
O
13 14 1 2
12 11 10
9
3
6
5
4 CH3
CH3 8 7
OH
O X
1,5,11-Trimethyl-8-(1methylethyl)-15oxabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-2,6diene-5,12-diol
8-Hydroxy-4,8,14-trimethyl-11(1-methylethyl)-15oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca4,9-dien-6-one
Figure II.A-2 Tobacco and/or tobacco smoke alcohols related to cembrene.
Much research was conducted after the mid-1950s to identify alcohol components in the particulate phase of cigarette MSS primarily because some were found to contribute consumer acceptable flavor and aroma properties to the MSS. As noted by Rodgman (3266), many components, including alcohols, used by the tobacco industry in its flavor formulations [see listing by Doull et al. (1053)] are known components of additive-free tobacco and/or its smoke. Thus, such additives are not strangers to the tobacco and/or its smoke but their addition increases the consumer acceptable flavor. Table II.A-4 lists some of the tobacco and/or tobacco smoke alcohol components that have been or are used in flavor formulations. Table II.A-5 is a catalog of the alcohols identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Of the 1462 alcohols identified to date, 531 have been reported in tobacco smoke, 1152 in tobacco, and 221 in both tobacco and tobacco smoke.
II.B PHYTOSTEROLS The alcohol category in tobacco and tobacco smoke includes the phytosterols, the plant-derived sterols. The sterols have been examined in considerable detail over the years, an examination that did not actually originate in the study of tobacco and/or its smoke. In 1928, Kennaway and Sampson demonstrated the tumorigenicity of the pyrolysate from the sterol cholesterol (2080). Their study preceded the first reports of induction of skin cancer in laboratory animals with two individual compounds, the PAHs dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) in 1930 by Kennaway and Hieger (2078) and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) in 1932 by Cook et al. (796a, 797). Both PAHs subsequently were classified as highly potent tumorigens. Based on the results of their detailed study of the
tumorigenicity of several PAHs, Barry et al. (194) reported that a third PAH, 3-methylcholanthrene, was also a highly potent tumorigen. 3-Methylcholanthrene was subsequently named 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene. Because of their structural similarity, 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j] aceanthrylene became the object of the search in the pyrolysate from cholesterol (Figure II.B-1). Cholesterol and several similarly structured phytosterols (campesterol, β-sitosterol, and stigmasterol) are components of tobacco and a portion of each is transferred intact to smoke during the smoking process. The phytosterols in tobacco have been reported by numerous investigators, for example, Traetta-Mosca (3942b), Kobel and Neuberg (2153a), Shmuk (3656a), Khanolkar et al. (2087), and Venkatarao et al. (4042b). All have been reported in tobacco as glycosides by Bolt and Clarke (390), Dymicky and Stedman (1079), Kallianos et al. (2018, 2019), and Khanolkar et al. (2087) and long-chained saturated and unsaturated acid esters (3296). Theoretically, all could yield 1,2-dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene and/or 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene during the smoking process. To date, the identification of this PAH in tobacco smoke has been reported by only one investigator, Kröller (2191). Dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene (cholanthrene) was not among the several PAHs isomeric with 1,2-dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene reported by Snook et al. (3756–3758). In the late 1940s there was much interest in 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j] aceanthrylene because of its possible generation from cholesterol during the heating of cholesterol-containing foodstuffs. While 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene could actually be synthesized from cholesterol by a series of sophisticated chemical reactions (1184a), attempts to generate it by pyrolysis of cholesterol were unsuccessful.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 115
11/13/08 4:59:32 PM
116
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table II.A-4 Tobacco and/or Smoke Alcohols Used in Flavor Formulations Identified In CAS No.
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
60-12-8 100-51-6 105-13-5 98-85-1 122-97-4 507-70-0 107-88-0 71-36-3 98-55-5 562-74-3 112-30-1 7212-44-4 64-17-5 57-48-7 59-23-4 50-99-7 57-50-1 50-99-7 111-27-3 104-76-7 544-12-7 31103-86-3 78-70-6 106-25-2 111-87-5 3391-86-4 106-22-9 71-41-0 57-55-6 56-81-5 78-83-1 104-54-1 118-71-8 50-70-4
Benzeneethanol Benzenemethanol Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxyBenzenemethanol, α-methylBenzenepropanol Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-2ol, endo-1,7,7,-trimethyl1,3-Butanediol 1-Butanol 3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, α,α,4-trimethyl3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-methyl-1-(1-methylethyl)1-Decanol 1,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethylEthanol D-Fructose D-Galactose α-D-Glucose α-D-Glucopyranoside, β-D-fructofuranosyl- {sucrose} α-D-Glucose 1-Hexanol 1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl3-Hexen-1-ol Mannose 1,6-Octadien-6-ol, 3,7-dimethyl2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl1-Octanol 1-Octen-3-ol 6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl1-Pentanol 1,2-Propanediol 1,2,3-Propanetriol 1-Propanol, 2-methyl2-Propen-1-ol, 3-phenyl4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-methylSorbitol a
a
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
Smoke
Tobacco
phenethyl alcohol benzyl alcohol anisyl alcohol α-methylbenzyl alcohol 3-phenyl-1-propanol borneol 1,3-butanediol butyl alcohol α-terpineol 4-carvomenthol capric alcohol nerolidol ethyl alcohol sugars sugars sugars sugars sugars hexyl alcohol 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 3-hexen-1-ol sugars linalool nerol 1-octanol 1-octen-3-ol dl-citronellol amyl alcohol propylene glycol glycerol isobutyl alcohol cinnamyl alcohol maltol glucitol
+ + — — + + + + + + — + + + + + + + — + — + — — — — + — + + + + + —
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + +
orbitol (glucitol)) is not included in the Doull et al. list (1053) but is included in flavor formulations used by cigarette manufacturers outside of the U.S. S [see Table 7A in (3266)].
As shown in Figure II.B-2, pyrolysis of cholesterol {Ia} yields chrysene {III}, Diels′ hydrocarbon {IV}—a methylcyclopentaphenanthrene—and numerous other PAHs. Both PAHs noted have also been identified in pyrolysates of the major tobacco phytosterols [Wynder et al. (4356), Van Duuren (4022)]. More recently in the early 1970s, Hecht et al. (1560) discussed the generation of chrysene and alkylchrysenes by pyrolysis of phytosterols. Although none of the sterols {Ia–Id} has been shown to generate the potent tumorigen 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j] aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) on pyrolysis, Falk et al. (1171) reported that cholesterol and cholesterol esters on pyrolysis do generate the mouse-skin tumorigens 4-cholesten-
3-one {Va} and 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa}. Veldstra (4042a) reported that the pyrolysis of cholesteryl oleate also yielded 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa}. Cholesteryl oleate was probably a component of the mixture of phytosteryl esters described in flue-cured tobacco by Rowland and Latimer (3358). Its analogs stigmasteryl oleate and β-sitosteryl oleate were among the phytosteryl esters in tobacco smoke characterized by Rodgman et al. (3296). The other identified phytosteryl esters included stigmasterol and β-sitosterol esterified with saturated acids (lauric, palmitic, stearic, and myristic) and unsaturated acids (linolenic and linoleic) (3296). Relative to the low level of cholesterol {1a}, tobacco usually contains substantial levels of several phytosterols
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 116
11/13/08 4:59:33 PM
117
Alcohols and Phytosterols
Table Ii.A-5 Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 117
11/13/08 4:59:35 PM
118
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 118
11/13/08 4:59:36 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
119
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 119
11/13/08 4:59:38 PM
120
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 120
11/13/08 4:59:55 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
121
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 121
11/13/08 4:59:58 PM
122
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 122
11/13/08 5:00:03 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
123
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 123
11/13/08 5:00:05 PM
124
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 124
11/13/08 5:00:07 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
125
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 125
11/13/08 5:00:10 PM
126
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 126
11/13/08 5:00:13 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
127
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 127
11/13/08 5:00:21 PM
128
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 128
11/13/08 5:00:23 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
129
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 129
11/13/08 5:00:26 PM
130
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 130
11/13/08 5:00:28 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
131
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 131
11/13/08 5:00:33 PM
132
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 132
11/13/08 5:00:35 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
133
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 133
11/13/08 5:00:48 PM
134
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 134
11/13/08 5:00:49 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
135
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 135
11/13/08 5:00:52 PM
136
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 136
11/13/08 5:00:54 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
137
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 137
11/13/08 5:00:57 PM
138
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 138
11/13/08 5:01:00 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
139
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 139
11/13/08 5:01:03 PM
140
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 140
11/13/08 5:01:05 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
141
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 141
11/13/08 5:01:08 PM
142
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 142
11/13/08 5:01:10 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
143
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 143
11/13/08 5:01:13 PM
144
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 144
11/13/08 5:01:15 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
145
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 145
11/13/08 5:01:18 PM
146
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 146
11/13/08 5:01:20 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
147
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 147
11/13/08 5:01:23 PM
148
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 148
11/13/08 5:01:25 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
149
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 149
11/13/08 5:01:28 PM
150
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 150
11/13/08 5:01:30 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
151
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 151
11/13/08 5:01:33 PM
152
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 152
11/13/08 5:01:35 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
153
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 153
11/13/08 5:01:38 PM
154
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 154
11/13/08 5:01:40 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
155
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 155
11/13/08 5:01:43 PM
156
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 156
11/13/08 5:01:45 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
157
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 157
11/13/08 5:01:48 PM
158
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 158
11/13/08 5:01:51 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
159
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 159
11/13/08 5:01:53 PM
160
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 160
11/13/08 5:02:03 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
161
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 161
11/13/08 5:02:06 PM
162
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 162
11/13/08 5:02:14 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
163
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 163
11/13/08 5:02:16 PM
164
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 164
11/13/08 5:02:18 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
165
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 165
11/13/08 5:02:21 PM
166
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 166
11/13/08 5:02:30 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
167
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 167
11/13/08 5:02:31 PM
168
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 168
11/13/08 5:02:34 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
169
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 169
11/13/08 5:02:37 PM
170
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 170
11/13/08 5:02:41 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
171
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 171
11/13/08 5:02:43 PM
172
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 172
11/13/08 5:02:46 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
173
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 173
11/13/08 5:02:49 PM
174
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 174
11/13/08 5:02:51 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
175
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 175
11/13/08 5:02:54 PM
176
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 176
11/13/08 5:02:57 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
177
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 177
11/13/08 5:02:59 PM
178
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 178
11/13/08 5:03:02 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
179
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 179
11/13/08 5:03:12 PM
180
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 180
11/13/08 5:03:14 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
181
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 181
11/13/08 5:03:18 PM
182
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 182
11/13/08 5:03:20 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
183
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 183
11/13/08 5:03:24 PM
184
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 184
11/13/08 5:03:35 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
185
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 185
11/13/08 5:03:36 PM
186
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 186
11/13/08 5:03:39 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
187
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 187
11/13/08 5:03:42 PM
188
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 188
11/13/08 5:03:46 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
189
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 189
11/13/08 5:03:56 PM
190
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 190
11/13/08 5:04:10 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
191
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 191
11/13/08 5:04:12 PM
192
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 192
11/13/08 5:04:15 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
193
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 193
11/13/08 5:04:24 PM
194
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 194
11/13/08 5:04:27 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
195
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 195
11/13/08 5:04:38 PM
196
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 196
11/13/08 5:04:45 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
197
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 197
11/13/08 5:04:56 PM
198
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 198
11/13/08 5:04:58 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
199
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 199
11/13/08 5:05:01 PM
200
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 200
11/13/08 5:05:06 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
201
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 201
11/13/08 5:05:30 PM
202
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 202
11/13/08 5:05:31 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
203
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 203
11/13/08 5:05:44 PM
204
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table Ii.A-5 (Continued) Alcohols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 204
11/13/08 5:05:47 PM
205
Alcohols and Phytosterols
H 3C CH3 H3C
H3C
CH3
CH3
H3C HO Cholesterol
1,2-Dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene
Figure II.B-1 Theoretical conversion of cholesterol to 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene.
R
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3 H3C IV
CH3
R CH3
O CH3
CH3
R
V
CH3
CH3
CH3
HO
II
VI
I
III
LEGEND Sterol,
R=
Ia
cholesterol
-(CH2)3-CH(CH3)2
Ib
campesterol
-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2
Ic
β-sitosterol
-(CH2)2-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2
Id
stigmasterol
Ie
ergosterola
-CH=CH-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2
II
-CH=CH-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2
1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene)
III
chrysene
IV
Diels´ hydrocarbon
Va
4-cholesten-3-one
VIa
3,5-cholestadiene
Vb
4-campesten-3-one
VIb
3,5-campestadiene
Vc
β-4-sitosten-3-one
VIc
β-3,5-sitostadiene
Vd
stigmasten-3-one
VId
3,5-stigmastadiene
Ve
ergostadien-3-one
VIe
3,5,7-ergostatriene
a
Ergosterol has a double bond at the 7-position
Figure II.B-2 Possible sterol degradation products.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 205
11/13/08 5:05:54 PM
206
[campesterol {Ib}, β-sitosterol {Ic}, stigmasterol {Id}, and ergosterol {Ie}] structurally similar to cholesterol. Phytosterols {Ib}, {Ic}, and {Id} differ slightly from cholesterol in the structure of the long side chain whereas ergosterol {Ie} not only differs slightly from cholesterol in the structure of its long side chain but also has an extra double bond at the 7-position (Figure II.B-2). They are present in tobacco in both the free and bound form (as glycosides and esters), and they are transferred as such to mainstream smoke (MSS). The sterols constitute about 0.2% of the tobacco weight. In the late 1950s to early 1960s, Rodgman proposed that the tobacco phytosterols—campesterol, β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and ergosterol—might generate compounds analogous to the tumorigenic 4-cholesten-3-one {Va} and 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa} generated from cholesterol, that is, 4-campesten-3-one {Vb}, 3,5-campestadiene {VIb}, β-4sitosten-3-one {Vc}, 3,5-sitostadiene {VIc}, 4-stigmasten-3 -one {Vd}, 3,5-stigmastadiene {VId}, ergosten-3-one {Ve}, and 3,5,7-ergostatriene {VIe}, on thermal degradation of these tobacco phytosterols or their esters during the smoking process. These campesterol-, β-sitosterol-, stigmasterol-, and ergosterol-related compounds might also be mouse-skin tumorigens as are their cholesterol counterparts. For nearly a decade, Rodgman and Cook (3286) were unsuccessful in their periodic efforts to isolate any of these phytosteryl ketones or dienes from CSC and identify them. However, Benner et al. (273) did subsequently identify two of these 3,5-dienes, 3,5-campestadiene {VIb} and 3,5-stigmastadiene {VId}, in tobacco smoke, see also Eatough et al. (1099, 1100). In 1939, the PAHs anthracene, phenanthrene, and B[a]P were reported as components of a tobacco-related material by Roffo (3323, 3325, 3326) and his son (3316–3318). In discussions of tobacco smoke, the Roffo findings are generally disregarded because the three PAHs they reported were not detected in tobacco smoke but were identified in a destructive distillate of tobacco. However, Roffo did report another finding that led to much research both within and outside the tobacco industry. Roffo (3327) reported that comparison of the destructive distillate of tobacco with the destructive distillate of an ethanol-extracted tobacco indicated that the PAH content, particularly B[a]P, and the specific tumorigenicity of the extracted tobacco destructive distillate were reduced from those of the destructive distillate from the control tobacco. Roffo speculated that the precursors of the tumorigenic PAH components of his distillates were ethanol-soluble phytosterols. Eventually his prediction, as far as it went, was found to be true for cigarette MSS (327, 398). In July 1954, Rodgman—a newly hired scientist at RJRT R&D—described the findings of the Roffos (3316–3318, 3323, 3325, 3327) to two colleagues who were previously unaware of them. He particularly emphasized the organic-solvent extraction of tobacco to remove PAH precursors. The discussion resulted within a week of one of the colleagues proposing an extraction method for removal of the phytosterols from tobacco (114). A few months later, Rodgman initiated a lengthy study of the effect of organic-solvent extraction on the PAH content
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
of its MSS (3240–3242, 3246, 3251). All of the extractions of different tobacco types and blends with different organic solvents and the fabrication of the cigarettes from the extracted and control tobaccos were conducted by Ashburn (116, 117). Two major mechanisms were proposed for the pyrogenesis of PAHs in tobacco smoke. (1) PAHs are formed by degradation of organic tobacco components to simpler molecules and/or free radicals during the pyrolysis processes occurring in the burning cigarette, followed by recombination of these simpler fragments to yield PAHs (the degradation-combination mechanism) [see Badger et al. (142–144) and earlier papers]. (2) PAHs are formed unimolecularly by cyclization, dehydration, aromatization, ring expansion, etc., of high molecular weight tobacco components such as the phytosterols, the tetradecacyclic duvanes, long-chained saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, alcohols, and esters, etc. (the aromatization reaction) [Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3286)]. Obviously, the mechanism of formation of PAHs is not an either-or situation. Experimental data indicate that both mechanisms are operative in PAH formation in the burning cigarette. Evidence for unimolecular aromatization was provided by pyrolysis data and by MSS PAH data from cigarettes “spiked” with phytosterols (3269, 3286). The relatively large increase in the levels of chrysene and methylcyclopentaphenanthrene (Diels’ hydrocarbon) vs. those for B[a]P and other tetra- and pentacyclic PAHs are more readily explained by the unimolecular aromatization of the tetracyclic sterol than by the degradation-recombination mechanism. The formation of several PAHs (chrysene, picene, several cyclopentaphenanthrenes, etc.) from various sterols had been reported by Diels, Ruzicka, and their colleagues in the 1920s and 1930s [see historical summary by Fieser and Fieser (1949)]. Early research on PAHs in roasted and/or grilled meats evolved from the theory that cholesterol when heated would generate the highly potent tumorigen 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j] aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene). As noted previously, sterols in tobacco include cholesterol plus much higher levels of several phytosterols whose structures differ only slightly from that of cholesterol. In 1959, Wynder et al. in an addendum to their publication (4356) reported that the pyrolysis of tobacco phytosterols at 720°C and 850°C gave B[a]P and other PAHs plus low levels of alkyl derivatives of phenanthrene, pyrene, and chrysene. Much of the early research on the isolation and identification of phytosterol and their derivatives from tobacco and tobacco smoke is summarized and referenced in the 1959 review by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) and the 1968 review by Stedman (3797). Table II.B-1 chronicles many of the reported studies on phytosterols and their derivatives in tobacco and tobacco smoke plus the studies on the pyrolysis of phytosterols. Table II.B-2 lists the 111 phytosterols and phytosteryl derivatives identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Of these 111 components, 44 have been reported as tobacco smoke components, 102 as tobacco components, and 35 in both tobacco and tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 206
11/13/08 5:05:55 PM
Identification in Tobacco of Year
Phytosterols
1913 1928 1935 1937 1939 1942 1943 1949 1955 1957
Traetta-Mosca (3942b)
1958
Rowland (3346), Dymicky and Stedman (1079), Grossman and Stedman (1433) Dymicky and Stedman (1080, 1082) Stedman and Rusaniwskyj (3808) Giles (1291), Reid (3097)
1959 1960 1961 1963 1965 1968 1971 1972 1974/5 1976 1977 1978 1979 1984 1998 2000 2001 a
Derivatives of Phytosterols
Identification In Tobacco Smoke of Phytosterols
Derivatives of Phytosterols
Pyrolysis Studies on Sterols or their Inclusion in a Smoked Cigarette
Alcohols and Phytosterols
78836_C002.indd 207
Table II.B-1 Studies on Identification of Phytosterols and Phytosteryl Derivatives in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Kennaway and Sampson (2080) Schürch and Winterstein (3562)
Kobel and Neuberg (2153a) Shmuk (3656a)
Veldstra (4042a) Roffo (3327) Venkatarao et al. (4042b) Falk et al. (1171) Khanolkar et al. (2087)
(G)a Khanolkar et al. (2087)
(G) Dymicky and Stedman (1079)
Kosak et al. (2178), Rodgman and Chappell (3268) Carruthers and Johnstone (612) (E) Rodgman et al. (3296)
(G) Dymicky and Stedman (1080, 1081) Sakaguchi and Kobashi (3391) (G) Kallianos et al. (2019)
Wynder et al. (4355), Rodgman and Cook (3269) Wynder et al. (4356)
(G) Kallianos et al. (2018) (G) Kallianos et al. (2019)
Ehrhardt et al. (1117) Cheng et al. (690) Grunwald et al. (1434) Davis (907a) Schmeltz et al. (3484) Tancogne and Chouteau (3867), Lotti et al. (2400) Davis (909), Menser et al. (2531), Tojib et al. (3920), Tancogne (3866) Severson et al. (3612)
Schmeltz et al. (3484)
Severson et al. (3616) Chopra and Al-Kubaisi (705) Forehand and Moldoveanu (1214) Britt et al. (435) Britt et al. (433)
(G) = glucosides, (E) = esters
207
11/13/08 5:05:56 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
208
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table II.B-2 Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 208
11/13/08 5:05:58 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
209
Table II.B-2 (continued) Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 209
11/13/08 5:06:00 PM
210
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table II.B-2 (continued) Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 210
11/13/08 5:06:03 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
211
Table II.B-2 (continued) Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 211
11/13/08 5:06:05 PM
212
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table II.B-2 (continued) Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 212
11/13/08 5:06:08 PM
Alcohols and Phytosterols
213
Table II.B-2 (continued) Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 213
11/13/08 5:06:10 PM
214
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table II.B-2 (continued) Phytosterols, Their Derivatives, and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C002.indd 214
11/13/08 5:06:16 PM
3
Aldehydes and Ketones
The publication in the early 1950s of the results of several retrospective studies on association between cigarette smoking and respiratory tract cancer, particularly lung cancer, and the study on induction of skin carcinoma in a susceptible strain of mice painted with massive doses of cigarette tar for the better part of their life span [Wynder et al. (4306a)] triggered intensive interest in the composition of cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS). Because the cigarette smoke condensate (CSC), or total particulate matter (TPM), the phase of the smoke aerosol reported to be the mouse-skin tumorigen, embodied the particulate phase of the cigarette smoke aerosol, considerable effort was devoted to defining its composition with emphasis on the presence in it of tumorigenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), particularly benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). This effort was conducted by research groups both within and outside of the tobacco industry. However, because knowledge of the composition of tobacco smoke was so sketchy in the mid-1950s, several research groups initiated the detailed examination of the tobacco smoke aerosol to define not only its physical characteristics but also the composition of its vapor phase. For most of the balance of the 1950s, the results from the composition studies of cigarette smoke vapor phase received little attention compared to that directed at the particulate-phase composition results. In 1954, Kosak (2170) published a list of components reported to be present in tobacco smoke. His list is shown in Table III-1. The aldehydes listed included formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein (2-propenal), butyraldehyde (butanal), benzaldehyde, and 2-furaldehyde. In several instances, Kosak questioned whether the analytical data reported were sufficient to define unequivocally the identity of the smoke component. The ketones listed by Kosak included 3-pentanone (diethyl ketone), 4-heptanone (di-n-propyl ketone), 17-tritriacontanone (dipalmityl ketone), 2,3-butanedione (biacetyl), and “higher” ketones. Because the low molecular weight aldehydes such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde (propanal), acrolein (propenal), and butyraldehyde (butanal) and ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone (2-butanone), and diethyl ketone (3-pentanone) in cigarette MSS occur primarily in the vapor phase, their identification and analysis in the 1950s and 1960s were facilitated by conversion to less volatile compounds. Many of these low molecular weight carbonyl compounds form stable compounds with various derivatizing agents and in many instances the derivative formation is almost quantitative. The use of Girard T (trimethylamine) or Girard P (pyridine) reagent to derivatize tobacco smoke carbonyl compounds was described by Seligman (3581) and Resnik and
Seligman (3108). The derivatives were separated by paper chromatography and identified from their mass spectra. A reagent that proved to be an excellent one to derivatize tobacco MSS aldehydes, ketones, and keto acids was 2,4dinitrophenylhydrazine. Individual hydrazones were isolated by various chromatographic means (column chromatography, paper chromatography, and eventually HPLC) and their levels estimated spectrophotometrically. Another ingenious use of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine was the following: The less stable Girard T or Girard P derivatives were decomposed and the carbonyl compounds released were converted to the highly stable 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones for identification and quantitation. Subsequently, the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine procedure was adapted to the investigation of carbonyl compounds in tobacco, in its headspace vapors, in sidestream smoke (SSS), and in environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). A third reagent used for the estimation of aliphatic aldehydes in tobacco smoke was 3-methylbenzothiazolone hydrazone hydrochloride [Weaving (4155), Davis and Sneade (915)]. Table III-2 summarizes some of the studies on low molecular weight carbonyl components of tobacco smoke in which various derivatizing reagents were used, the derivatives formed were separated by a variety of techniques (column, paper, TLC, HPLC), and identified and estimated by spectral means (UV, IR, mass, colorimetry). The results of many of these studies provided quantitative data on the per cigarette MSS yield of several carbonyl compounds of interest. As the interest in the overall composition of tobacco smoke escalated in the 1950s and 1960s, the potential of the utilization of gas chromatography to examine and define the vapor-phase composition was examined. For example, Seligman et al. (3584), in their gas chromatographic study of the components of a synthetic mixture comprising seventeen compounds known to be present in tobacco smoke, demonstrated the feasibility that the seventeen diverse compounds could be successfully separated by gas chromatography. Among the seventeen standard compounds, ranging from methane to water, were acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, and acetone. Subsequent to the successful separation of the compounds, the identity of each was confirmed by mass spectroscopy. As a requisite and adjunct to their study of selective filtration of tobacco smoke components and the effect of carbon filters on cigarette MSS composition, Laurene et al. (2305) developed and described a gas chromatographic analysis of acetaldehyde, acrolein, and acetone in cigarette MSS. In addition to the analytical methodology, Laurene et al. also provided data on the MSS yields of acetaldehyde, acetone, and acrolein from 65-mm nonfiltered cigarettes containing 215
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 215
11/24/08 12:21:15 PM
216
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-1 Tobacco Smoke Components Listed by Kosak (2170) Class
Component
Class
Component
Class
Component
Hydrocarbons
Hentriacontane (?) Acetylene “Unsaturated hydrocarbons” Azulene Phenanthrene (?) Anthracene (?) Benzopyrene (?) “Condensed aromatics” (?)
Ketones
3-Pentanone 4-Heptanone 17-Tritriacontanone (?) 2,3-Butanedione “Higher” ketones (?)
Acids
Formic acid Acetic acid Butyric acid Valeric acid Caproic acid C7 and C8 aliphatic acids (?) Succinic acid (?) Fumaric acid (?) Citric acid (?) Benzoic acid (?) Phenolic acids (?)
Alcohols and Phenols
Methanol Glycerol Diethylene glycol Ethylene glycol Phenol (?) Catechol (?)
Alkaloids
Nicotine Pyridyl ethyl ketone Myosmine Nicotyrine α-Socratinec β-Socratinec γ-Socratinec Obelinc Lohitamc Anodminc Lathraeinc Poikilinec Gudhamc
Miscellaneous Components
Levoglucosand “Phytosterol” (?) C10H14O (a furan ?) “Resins” (?) “Resin acids” (?)
Aldehydes
Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Butyraldehyde Acrolein (?) Benzaldehyde 2-Furaldehyde (?)a
Other N-containing components
Pyrrole (?) “Pyrroles” (?) “N-Methyl-pyrrolidines” (?) Pyridine “Picoline” (?) “Lutidine” (?) “Collidine” (?) “Pyridine bases” (?) Methylamine (?) “Chlorophyll degradation products” (?) “Uric acids” (?)
Inorganic Components
Ammonia Carbon monoxide Carbon dioxide Hydrogen cyanide Hydrogen sulfide Thiocyanic acid (?) Oxygen Arsenicb “Acetates” (?) “Chlorides” (?) “Cyanides” (?) “Nitrates” (?)
The question mark indicates that Kosak did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. Probably present as As2O3. c Subsequent study demonstrated this component was not a well-defined compound but an artifact, a mixture, or an ammonium salt [see discussion by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971)]. d 1,6-Anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose a
b
individual tobacco types (flue-cured or burley or Oriental tobacco) or a blend of all three (50 mm of the tobacco rod smoked). The effect of a charcoal filter tip on the MSS levels of these carbonyl compounds was also determined. Their data are summarized in Table III-3. Modifications of gas chromatographic methods to determine vapor-phase carbonyl compounds in cigarette MSS continued for more than three decades, for example, see Miyake and Shibamoto (2564). Figure III-1 shows the approximate composition of MSS from a cigarette that delivers about 22.5 mg of wet total particulate matter (WTPM) and 17.6 mg of Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) “tar.” Excluding carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, acetaldehyde is the vapor-phase component usually found at the highest level in cigarette MSS. The non-filtered cigarette MSS yield of acetaldehyde ranged from 18 µg/cigarette [Huynh et al. (1853a)] to 2815 µg/cigarette [Miyake and Shibamoto (2564)]. The acetone yield was slightly less than 50% of the acetaldehyde yield. Acrolein is the next most plentiful aldehyde, followed by formaldehyde, 2-furaldehyde, and crotonaldehyde. Per cigarette formaldehyde MSS yields ranged from 3.4 µg for filtered cigarettes to 283 µg in nonfiltered cigarettes [Schaller et al. (3427), Miyake and Shibamoto (2564)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 216
11/24/08 12:21:15 PM
217
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-2 Studies on Low Molecular Weight Carbonyls in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke: Derivatizing Agents Description Girard T or Girard P reagent Aldehydes and ketones in cigarette MSS separated by conversion to Girard T or Girard P derivatives; derivatives separated by paper chromatography. Girard T or Girard P derivatives of cigarette MSS aldehydes and ketones were characterized my mass spectroscopy. 4-Nitrophenylhydrazine (4-NPH) To isolate and identify the low boiling aldehydes and ketones in cigarette MSS, they were derivatized with p-nitrophenylhydrazine. 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH) Classification of the structures of various carbonyl compounds from the UV and IR spectra of their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. Cigarette MSS aldehydes and ketones, regenerated from Girard T or Girard P derivatives, were characterized by conversion to their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. 2,4-DNPH derivatives of tobacco smoke carbonyls were separated by paper and column chromatography. Various keto acids in tobacco seeds were identified from their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. Levels of mono- and dicarbonyl components of cigarette MSS were estimated by spectrophotometry of their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. The levels of low molecular weight aldehydes and ketones in cigarette MSS were estimated from their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. After removal of other oxidizable material, the glycerol content of tobacco could be estimated by oxidation of the glycerol and conversion of its oxidation product to its 2,4-DNPH derivative. Examination of 2,4-DNPH derivatives from tobacco and smoke revealed presence of several keto acids. Carbonyl components of cigar MSS were characterized by IR, UV, x-ray diffraction, and paper chromatography of their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. Examination of the 2,4-DNPH derivatives of tobacco smoke carbonyls revealed the presence of several dicarbonyl compounds. Identification of dicarbonyl components of tobacco smoke via their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. To aid in identification of aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke and in cellulose smoke, over 90 2,4-DNPH derivatives were prepared to serve as melting point and spectral standards. Carbonyl components in cigar MSS identified after 2,4-DNPH derivative formation, followed by exchange reaction of 2,4-DNPH derivatives with α-ketoglutaric acid. α-Ketoglutaric acid exchange procedure applied to identification of low molecular weight carbonyl components of tobacco. 2,4-DNPH derivatives of low molecular weight carbonyl components of tobacco smoke were separated by TLC. 2,4-DNPH derivatives previously prepared (1238) were used to characterize carbonyl components in cigarette smoke. Instead of α-ketoglutaric acid, oxalic acid and p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde were used in exchange release of low molecular weight smoke carbonyl components from their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. 2,4-DNPH derivatives of cigarette smoke carbonyls separated by gas chromatography. Formaldehyde level of cigarette MSS estimated by HPLC of its 2,4-DNPH derivative. The levels of C1 through C4 aldehydes and ketones in cigarette MSS were estimated by HPLC of their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. 2,4-DNPH derivatives of acrolein (propenal) and acetone from tobacco smoke were separated by HPLC. The level of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde in tobacco and tobacco smoke were estimated via its 2,4-DNPH derivative. Volatile, low molecular weight carbonyl components of the headspace from tobacco and from MSS were quantitated through their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. Development of method to determine formaldehyde in cigarette sidestream smoke; method applicable to other low molecular weight carbonyl components of sidestream smoke. Low molecular weight carbonyl compounds in ETS were collected as their 2,4-DNPH derivatives. 3-Methylbenzothiazolone hydrazone hydrochloride Aliphatic aldehydes in MSS were estimated by derivative formation, followed by colorimetry. Aliphatic aldehydes in MSS were estimated by derivative formation, followed by colorimetry. Analysis refined to permit estimation of acrolein (propenal). Aldehyde and Ketone Derivatization Review of compounds used to derivatize aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke.
Reference
Seligman (3581) Resnik and Seligman (3108) Sakuma et al. (3396)
Jones et al. (1977a) Seligman (3581) Seligman and Edmonds (3582) Glock and Jensen (1312) Harrow et al. (1540) McRae and Mold (2525) Mold and McRae (2591) Martin et al. (2581) Glock (1310) Schepartz and Ogg (3438) Halter et al. (1491) Martin (2469) Fredrickson et al. (1238) Schepartz and McDowell (3436) Stephens et al. (3817) Lindsey et al. (2369) Frederickson et al. (1239) Jones and Monroe (1978a) Donzel (1049) Hodge and Mansfield (1670) Mansfield et al. (2456) Canon and Frank (591) Manning et al. (2452) Perini and Bell (2930) Brunnemann et al. (500) Bell et al. (243) DeLuca (929) Weaving (4155) Davis and Sneade (915)
Green and Rodgman (1373)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 217
11/24/08 12:21:16 PM
218
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-3 Analysis of Cigarette Mainstream Smoke by Gas Chromatography Puffs/cig, avge
Cigarette Sample a Flue-cured, non-filtered Burley, non-filtered Oriental, non-filtered Tobacco blend, non-filtered Tobacco blend, carbon filtered a
Acetaldehyde µg/cig
Acetone µg/cig
Acrolein µg/cig
856 847 726 832 208
372 533 385 440 42
83 57 54 75 11
9.3 7.3 11.0 8.0 8.0
50-mm of 65-mm tobacco rod smoked during analysis
Because of the extreme differences between the levels of various components in cigarette smoke, levels that vary from milligrams per cigarette for nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide to picograms per cigarette for several N-heterocyclic
TOTAL MAINSTREAM SMOKE
WET TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER (WTPM) 22.5 mg [4.5%]b
3.5 mg [0.70%]b {15.6%}c
Water Nicotine “Tar”
1.4 mg [0.28%]b { 6.2%}c
17.6 mg [3.52%]b {78.2%}c
amines (Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2), a logarithmic plot of the levels of specific MSS components was found to be a convenient way to compare their deliveries. In Figure III-2, a truncated form of the original logarithmic plot presented by Green and Rodgman 500 mga
VAPOR PHASE
477.5 mg [95.5%]
20.0 mg [4.0%]b
Waterd
295.0 mg [59.0%]b
Nitrogen
65.0 mg [13.0%]b
Oxygen Carbon dioxide Carbon monoxide Argon + helium + Neon + hydrogen
Alcoholse Acids Aldehydes and ketones Miscellaneous Alkanes Terpenoid hydrocarbons Smoke pigment Alkaloid derivatives Esters Phenols
Unidentifiedh Total weight =
3.5 mg [20.0%]f 2.9 mg [16.5%]f 2.5 mg [14.2%]f 2.3 mg [13.2%]f 1.1 mg [ 6.2%]f 1.1 mg [ 6.2%]f 0.9 mg [ 5.1%]f 0.8 mg [ 4.5%]f 0.8 mg [ 4.5%]f 0.8 mg [ 4.5%]f
62.5 mg [12.5%]b 20.0 mg [4.0%]b 7.5 mg [1.5%]b
“other components”
7.5 mg [1.5%]b
Hydrocarbons
3.8 mg [50.6%]g
Aldehydes + ketones Nitriles Miscellaneous Heterocyclics Alcohols Acids Esters
2.0 mg [26.7%]g 0.60 mg [8.0%]g 0.60 mg [8.0%]g 0.15 mg [2.0%]g 0.15 mg [2.0%]g 0.12 mg [1.6%]g 0.08 mg [1.1%]g
0.9 mg [ 5.1%]f 17.6 mg
Total weight = 7.50 mg
Note: The properties of the cigarette studied were as follows: 85-mm filtered cigarette; 68-mm, tobacco rod; 17-mm triacetin-plasticized cellulose acetate filter tip; cased commercial American blend a It is now estimated that over 5000 components have been identified in MSS from tobacco cigarettes. Some components such as water, the simple phenols, hydrogen cyanide, and the volatile N-nitrosamines are found in both the vapor and particulate phases of cigarette MSS. Hence the total of the number in the two phases appears to exceed the number in the whole. b Value in brackets represents percent of Total Mainstream Smoke weight, 500 mg. c Value in parentheses represents percent of WTPM, 22.5 mg. d Much of this water is contributed by the air drawn through the cigarette during puffing (35-ml puff, 1-sec duration, 1 puff/min, total puffs = 10) in a laboratory whose atmosphere is controlled to the specifications proposed by the FTC; namely, temperature = 25°C, relative humidity (RH) = 60%. e This class of compounds includes added humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol) transferred from the tobacco rod to the MSS. The transferred humectants constitute about 10 to 12% of the FTC “tar”. f Value in brackets represents percent of FTC “tar” weight, 17.6 mg. g Value in brackets represents percent of “Other Components” weight, 7.5 mg. h There have been various estimates of the number of unidentified components present in extremely small amounts in the FTC “tar”. Several investigators have estimated the number of unidentified components to range from five to twenty times the number of identified components, i.e., from about 20000 to 100000.
Figure III-1 Approximate composition of cigarette mainstream smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 218
11/24/08 12:21:17 PM
219
Aldehydes and Ketones
Vapor phase
Nitrogen
Mainstream smoke yield/cig
Particulate phase
400 mg 200
Oxygen, carbon dioxide
Water, carbon monoxide
100 mg 80 40 20
FTC “tar”
10 mg 8
4 2 Acetaldehyde Isoprene Acetone Limonene Nitric oxide HCN Acrolein 1, 3-Butadiene Formaldehyde 2-Furaldehyde Crotonaldehyde Benzene Acrylonitrile
1000 µg = 1 mg 800 400 200
Water
Humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol) Total alkanes Saturated aliphatic esters
100 µg 80
Solanesol Phytosterols
40
Solanesyl esters
Nicotine The acids: palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic Catechol Total alkyl pyridines
20 10 µg 8
Phenol
o-Cresol Phytyl esters
4
α-Tocopherol Solanesyl acetate
Indole Indole, 3-methylAnabasine
Figure III-2 Cigarette mainstream smoke components: logarithmic plot.
(1373), shows the cigarette MSS yields of several of the most plentiful vapor-phase aldehydes and acetone. Table III-4, modified and updated from similar tables presented by Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) and by Baker (171a), summarizes the major precursor relationships proposed and/ or demonstrated to date between tobacco leaf components and tobacco smoke components. These proposals are based in part on the results of a great variety of pyrolysis studies. In some cases, the validation of the proposals is based on the results obtained by addition of leaf components to tobacco and assessing the effect on the levels of specific MSS components when the “spiked” tobacco is actually smoked in a
cigarette and its MSS composition is compared to that of the MSS from the control tobacco cigarette. In their quantitation (via their 4-nitrophenylhydrazone derivatives) of several aldehydes and ketones in the MSS from cigarettes made from flue-cured laminae and from fluecured midribs, Sakuma et al. (3396) reported no significant differences between the MSS yields of the compounds listed in Table III-5. However, many were much reduced when the cigarette was tipped with a charcoal filter. From their study of the pyrogenesis of acrolein (propenal) from glycerol, Doihara et al. (1023) and others deduced that a tobacco smoking product that contains glycerol as a
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 219
11/24/08 12:21:18 PM
220
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-4 Precursors in Tobacco of Aldehydes and Ketones in Tobacco Aldehydes and Ketones Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, 2-propenal (acrolein), acetone, α,β-dicarbonyls, furaldehydes
Precursors sugars
polysaccharides (cellulose, starch, and/or pectin)
lignin pectins C1-C5 aldehydes C3-C4 ketones 2-Furancarboxaldehyde Acetaldehyde Propanal Propanal, 2-methyl- (isobutyraldehyde) 2-Propenal 2-Butenal (crotonaldehyde) 2-Furancarboxaldehyde 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl2-Butanone 3-Buten-2-one
pectin
References Gager et al. (1264, 1265) Higman et al. (1647) Houminer and Patai (1835) Johnson et al. (1960) Fredrickson (1228) Fredrickson et al. (1238) Newell and Best (2764) Zamorani et al. (4398c) Martin et al. (2468a) Scheijen and Boon (3428) Newell and Best (2764) Scheijen et al. (3429) Squire and Waymack (3779a)
cellulose
Kato et al. (2046) Sakuma et al. (3401, 3402, 3404, 3045) Wakeham and Silberman (4104) Yamazaki and Saito (4369)
triglycerides
Kitamura (2111a)
Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Acetone 2-Propenal 2-Propenal
glycerol
Doihara et al. (1023, 1024)
glycerol
2-Propenal
polysaccharides lignin
Aromatic aldehydes: Benzaldehyde, 3,4-dihydroxy- (protocatechualdehyde), Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- (vanillin), Benzaldehyde, 3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxy- (syringaldehyde)
lignin
Harbin and Laurene (1497) Kröller (2192, 2196) Kobashi et al. (2144) Wynder and Hoffmann (4337) Burton (535) Fagerson (1170a) Kaburaki et al. (2003) Kato (2042) Kato et al, (2043, 2046) Kato et al. (2043) Martin et al. (2468a) Yang and Wender (4378)
Direct transfer from tobacco; however, lignin is the most likely precursor of many aromatic aldehydes as well as many aromatic acids in tobacco.
humectant has an enhanced potential for the formation and release of acrolein (propenal) during smoking [see Wynder and Hoffmann (4337)]. In their study of the levels of acrolein, acetaldehyde, acetone, hydrogen cyanide, nitrogen oxides, nicotine, and total solids in pipe tobacco MSS, Harbin and Laurene (1497) reported
Wender and Yang (4163) Yang and Wender (4378, 4379)
that the acrolein delivery increased as the glycerol level was increased by addition but the acrolein delivery eventually leveled off when the glycerol addition exceeded 6%. From an examination of the structure of lignin [see Ball (176a)], it is obvious why its pyrolysis products include a variety of phenolic aldehydes and acids, many of which
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 220
11/24/08 12:21:18 PM
221
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-5 Aldehydes and Ketones in Mainstream Smoke from All Lamina and All-Midrib Cigarettes In Mainstream Smoke From Flue-Cured Tobacco, µg/cig Carbonyl Compound
Lamina
Midrib
Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Propanal Propanal, 2-methylPropenal (acrolein) Butanal 2-Propanone (acetone) 2-Butanone
5 685 97 103 184 36 217 159
10 779 81 57 156 21 220 186
have been identified in cigarette MSS. Lignin is composed of coniferyl alcohol {I}, p-coumaryl alcohol {II}, and sinapyl alcohol {III} in a variety of ratios that are dependent on the plant species (Figure III-3).
The Assertion of Aldehydes and Ketones as Ciliastatic Tobacco Smoke Components The reports by Wynder et al. (4306a, 4306c) in the early 1950s that cigarette smoke tar or CSC was tumorigenic to mouse skin prompted an intense search for the responsible component(s). Initially, the PAHs were selected for investigation because of the wealth of chemical and biological data generated on a great number of them following the synthesis of DB[a,h]A in 1929 (760, 1184), the isolation and identification of B[a]P from coal tar in 1932 (796a, 797), and the demonstration of the potent tumorigenicity of both of them to mouse skin by the Kennaway group (194, 796a, 797, 2078). Almost immediately after the report by Wynder et al. (4306a) of the mouse skin-painting results with tobacco tar, the PAHs were proposed by some investigators to be the major tumor initiators in CSC. Because of its level in CSC and its potency in mouse-skin tumorigenesis, B[a]P was defined as the most significant of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. CH2=CH-CH2OH
We have demonstrated experimentally … that 0.0001 per cent or even 0.0005 per cent benzopyrene in acetone will not produce any tumors in the present experimental mouse or
CH2=CH-CH2OH
OCH3 OH I
However, it was soon recognized that neither the B[a] P content nor its tumorigenicity could explain the biological response observed in the mouse skin-painting bioassay. Similarly, neither the total content of the PAHs tumorigenic to mouse skin nor their summed tumorigenicities could explain the observed biological response. In fact, it was pointed out many times over the next several decades that the levels of B[a]P and other tumorigenic PAHs in tobacco smoke condensate accounted for less than 3% of the observed tumorigenicity [Wynder and Wright (4353, 4354), Wynder and Hoffmann (4307, 4308, 4312, 4316, 4317, 4319, 4332, 4342), Druckrey (1056), Roe (3310, 3311), USPHS (3999, 4005, 4009, 4010), Lazar et al. (2320), Stedman (3767), Selikoff et al. (3584a), Coultson (830)]. As early as the mid-1950s, Wynder and Wright (4353) noted that the concentration of B[a]P in CSC was insufficient to account for its observed carcinogenicity to mouse epidermis: “The concentration in which benzo[a]pyrene seems to be in cigarette tar is insufficient to account for the observed carcinogenic activity to mouse epidermis.” At the 1957 Blatnik Committee hearings, Wynder reported Wright’s opinion [Wright (4282a)] on the subject as well as his own [Wynder (4296)]. Wynder noted that much attention had been directed at the PAH B[a]P. So much in fact that, as Wynder stated, B[a]P had become an issue in itself because it was one of the known tumorigenic substances and everyone tried to blame everything on it alone. During his testimony, he also noted that his Sloan Kettering group had repeatedly stated that the amount of B[a]P in tobacco tar was insufficient to explain the animal results published by his group. He added that cigarette tar contained numerous other B[a] P-related compounds much more active than B[a]P and they most likely accounted for the majority of the activity, and it was more or less academic whether it was B[a]P or a dibenzopyrene or a dibenzanthracene or a substituted B[a]P because they were all formed in the same manner during the tobacco smoking process. That same year, Wynder and Wright (4354) wrote that, to that date, no carcinogens had been identified in large enough quantities in tobacco tar or its fractions to account for the observed activity in skin-painting studies:
CH2=CH-CH20H
H3CO OH II
OCH3 OH III
Figure III-3 Phenolic alcohol components of lignin.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 221
11/24/08 12:21:18 PM
222 rabbit groups. Thus, there is conclusive proof that the animal results cannot be solely due to the benzopyrene content of tobacco [sic]. The benzpyrene content of the total tar as well as the active fractions is far too low to account alone for the positive results [in laboratory animal]. So far, no carcinogens have been identified in large enough quantity in tobacco tar or its fractions to account for the observed activity.
These Wynder-Wright 1957 results led to an intensive but unsuccessful eighteen-month search for a “supercarcinogenic” PAH. The absence of such a PAH was subsequently confirmed by the USDA group at Athens, Georgia, by their identification of over 500 PAHs in the PAH fraction from cigarette MSS, an identification procedure that completely accounted for the fraction in the cigarette smoke studied (3732, 3736, 3756–3759). In 1959, unable to explain the bioassay (mouse skin-painting) results with CSC on the basis of either its B[a]P content (less than 2% explainable) or its total PAH content (less than 3% explainable), Wynder and Hoffmann (4307) at the 1959 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) meeting added the concept of promotion by low molecular weight phenols to the concept of tumor initiation by PAHs in an attempt (unsuccessful) to explain the bioassay results. They reiterated their view the following year at the 1960 AACR conference (4309): “The phenol fraction could be established as an important promoting portion of the tobacco smoke condensate.” A similar comment that the amount of tumorigenic PAHs found in CSC could not by themselves account for the total biological activity observed was included in a more detailed publication (4307) of their AACR presentation. They also stated (4308) that the higher PAHs played an important role in the carcinogenicity of CSC but when the various known concentrations of the carcinogenic PAHs as estimated in CSC were summed, it was obvious that they could not account for the established carcinogenicity of the CSC nor of its isolated PAH fraction. Several carcinogenic higher aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons [are] present in tobacco smoke condensate. They include benzo[a]pyrene …, benzo[e]pyrene …, chrysene …, benz[a] anthracene …, dibenz[a,h]anthracene …, and dibenzo[a,i] pyrene … From the amount in which these materials have been found in tobacco smoke condensate it was evident that these, by themselves, could not account for the total biological activity observed.
In 1960, Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported the identification of several aza-arenes (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) not only structurally similar to some of the known tumorigenic PAHs in CSC but also reported under certain conditions to be tumorigenic to mouse skin. Adding this class of tumorigenic cigarette smoke components to the assessment of the tumorigenicity of CSC failed to account for more than a few percent of the observed response. However, it should be noted that Candeli et al. (587) could not confirm the findings of Van Duuren et al. on the presence
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
of these three aza-arenes in cigarette MSS. During the next three decades, other research groups in Germany, Japan, and the United States were also unable to confirm the presence in cigarette MSS of dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and dibenzo[c,g]carbazole [3260, 3414, Table 12-7 in (172)]. Wynder and Hoffmann (4311) wrote that the PAHs in CSC accounted for not more than 3% of the total biological activity observed in mouse-skin bioassays: The polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons are mainly formed during the combustion of tobacco. The tobacco of our standard cigarettes contains only very minute quantities of benzo(a)pyrene (0.02 ppm). A bioassay indicates that these polycyclic hydrocarbons of the condensate by themselves, however, can account for not more than 3 per cent of the total biological activity.
Wynder and Hoffmann (4312) also wrote that the established carcinogenicity of CSC to mouse epidermis could to a great extent be accounted for on the basis of initiating carcinogens, largely PAHs, and promoting substances, a major group of which was the phenols. This statement was not true in 1961, nor is it true now. In their lengthy 1964 review of tobacco carcinogenesis, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319) stated that no one could deny that tobacco products were tumorigenic even though no single component in tobacco smoke could by itself or jointly with other components account for the observed tumorigenic activity of such tobacco products to the skin of laboratory animals: “It is furthermore true that none of the agents is carcinogenic in the concentrations in which they are present in tobacco products.” Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) expressed similar views on the tumorigenicity of tobacco smoke components in their 1967 book, but they continued to maintain that the PAHs in cigarette smoke were important as tumor initiators: While BaP and other carcinogenic PAH can by themselves account for only a small portion of the total tumorigenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate, probably less than 2%, they are, nevertheless, of obligatory importance as tumor initiators.
The next year, Wynder and Hoffmann (4342) wrote: Carcinogenic polynuclear hydrocarbons in the concentrations present in tobacco “tar” clearly do not, by themselves, account for the observed carcinogenicity.
On several occasions, the U.S. Surgeon General in his periodic reports on smoking and health discussed the relationship between the levels of PAHs in cigarette smoke, their tumorigenic potency to mouse skin, and the observed biological response with CSC in mouse skin-painting bioassays. The results of a number of such assays [mouse skin-painting] present a puzzling anomaly: the total tar from cigarettes has about 40 times the carcinogenic potency of the benzo(a) pyrene present in the tar. The other carcinogens known
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 222
11/24/08 12:21:18 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones to be present in tobacco smoke are, with the exception of dibenzo(a,i)pyrene, much less potent than benzo(a)pyrene and they are present in smaller amounts. Apparently, therefore, the whole is greater than the sum of the known parts. (3999)
Unable to explain the observed tumorigenicity to mouse skin of cigarette smoke condensate in terms of its content of known tumorigenic PAHs and/or tumorigenic aza-arenes, Wynder and Hoffmann (4307, 4309–4313) added the concept of promotion to their arsenal with particular emphasis on this property of the nontumorigenic PAH and low molecular weight phenolic components in the CSC. Inclusion of the concepts of initiation, promotion, and cocarcinogenesis by cigarette smoke components could only account for a small percentage of the number of tumor-bearing animals in the mouse skin-painting studies. This inability to explain the results observed in laboratory animals was a major creditability problem in the attempt to relate the laboratory animal data with CSC to human smoking experience. In an attempt to offset their failure to explain the mouse skin-painting bioassay results with CSC on the basis of its content of tumorigenic PAHs and aza-arenes, promoting and/ or cocarcinogenic phenols, and promoting and/or cocarcinogenic nontumorigenic PAHs, Wynder and Hoffmann (4314, 4315) added the concept of ciliastasis in an attempt (unsuccessful) to explain cigarette smoke tumorigenicity in smokers’ lungs. It was proposed that impairment of ciliary action would result in prolonged exposure of the ciliated tissue to the inhaled particle and the tumorigens contained therein. Obviously, ciliastasis is not relevant to the initiation of tumors in the mouse skin-painting bioassay with CSC. Cilia are small, hair-like entities covering the surface of certain portions of the upper respiratory tract* and these beat rhythmically and synchronously to move a thin layer of mucus upward toward the mouth where it is swallowed or expectorated. Inhaled particles may be entrained in this mucus and thus removed from the respiratory tract by its cilia-induced movement. Impairment of ciliary activity results in a failure to clear particles from the respiratory tract. This impairment of ciliary activity, known as ciliastasis, may be produced by a variety of inhaled materials. A detailed definition of cilia and description of their action appear in Rivera (3184a). Many of the early laboratory investigations on ciliastasis produced by cigarette MSS and/or its components were studies involving ciliated tissue from clams, mussels, or extirpated lung tissue from rabbits, etc. Usually, Hilding (1652a) is credited with initiating the interest in respiratory tract ciliastasis produced by cigarette MSS. In 1956 and 1957, he reported the results of his studies of the effect of cigarette smoke on ciliated tissue in the lungs of cows. However, numerous reports on studies of the ciliastatic action of cigarette MSS had appeared in the literature during the preceding two decades. *
Other anatomical sites in the mammalian body possess ciliated tissue, but these have no relevance to the discussion of tobacco smoke inhalation.
223
In the late 1930s, Mendenhall and Shreeve (2530a) and Proetz (2991a) described their studies on ciliastasis. Mendenhall and Shreeve (2530a) reported that nicotine in cigarette MSS did not appear to be a contributor to ciliastasis in extirpated bovine tracheal tissue exposed to cigarette MSS, but the difference they observed between the smokes from nonmentholated vs. mentholated cigarettes indicated that menthol had a ciliastatic effect. However, in 1952, Rakieten et al. (3072b) reported no difference between the MSSs from nonmentholated vs. mentholated cigarettes in the ciliastasis induced in ciliated tissue from humans, rabbits, or rats. Their findings conflicted with those reported by Mendenhall and Shreeve. Rakieten et al. (3072b) also reported that nicotine contributed only slightly to the observed ciliastatic effect of cigarette MSS. Representative studies on ciliastasis produced by cigarette MSS include those of Dalhamn (891a), Falk et al. (1175), Kotin and Falk (2179), and Ballenger (178). In all these studies, cigarette MSS was reported to be ciliastatic in in vitro systems. Falk et al. reported that nicotine was involved in the ciliastasis induced by cigarette smoke. However, Guillerm et al. (1451a) reported that neither nicotine nor hydrogen cyanide was a contributor to the ciliastasis produced by cigarette MSS when tested individually at the concentrations determined in cigarette MSS. They reported that all the aldehydes and ketones tested at their concentrations in cigarette MSS were ciliastatic and acetaldehyde and acrolein appeared to act synergistically in the ciliastatic action. In 1962, Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) combined the ciliastasis concept with the three tumorigenesis factors mentioned above: It was proposed that impairment of ciliary action would result in prolonged exposure of the ciliated tissue to the inhaled particle and the tumorigens contained therein. For the CSC, they reported low molecular weight phenols to be in vitro ciliastats and that cellulose acetate filters plasticized with triacetin substantially reduced the ciliastatic effect of phenols. The same year, Davis and George (911a) reported the effectiveness of triacetin-plasticized cellulose acetate in reducing the phenols level in cigarette MSS with the corresponding reduction of the observed ciliastasis. Because of the assertion that low molecular weight phenols were promoters for tumorigenic PAHs and thus played a role in CSC tumorigenesis and possibly in cancer causation in smokers, research was underway to find methods to reduce their levels in cigarette MSS, for example, the studies at Lorillard on selective phenols filtration by Spears (2399, 3765), at R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (RJRT) by Laurene (2295) and Laurene et al. (2306), by Hoffmann and Wynder (1791), Mokhnachev et al. (2579), and Morie (2628, 2629, 2636) and on phenol precursors by Rodgman et al. (3251, 3277, 3305, 3306), and by Wynder and Hoffmann (4317) on the precursors in tobacco of the low molecular weight phenols in tobacco smoke. Obviously, the results of these studies were equally applicable to reducing levels of phenols because of their alleged ciliastatic action in the respiratory tract. Wynder and Hoffmann (4317) and Wynder et al. (4350) reported the results of their study of the ciliastatic components
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 223
11/24/08 12:21:19 PM
224
in cigarette smoke condensate: Nicotine was not a factor in the ciliastasis of CSC; the phenolic fraction and the acidic fraction were significant ciliastats. The same year, Kensler and Battista (2083, 2084) reported their findings on the ciliastatic activity of vapor-phase components of cigarette MSS and its reduction by activated carbon filters. Falk et al. (1173a, 1175) also described the effect of many of the same smoke components on mucus flow. Hydrogen cyanide, acrolein, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, nitrogen oxides, ammonia, and phenol were considered important vapor-phase ciliastats.* The Kensler-Battista research on the effectiveness of carbon in reducing vapor-phase ciliastats in cigarette MSS was reported within a few months of the publication of the Reader’s Digest article on the effectiveness of carbon-containing filters in reducing ciliastats in cigarette MSS and the appearance in the marketplace of Liggett and Myers (L&M) Lark cigarette. Its filter included a chamber filled with a specially treated carbon based on a patent issued to Keith of L&M R&D. The Kensler-Battista study was performed at A.D. Little and was contracted by L&M (2083, 2084). Because of these reports on vapor-phase components of cigarette MSS, emphasis at RJRT R&D was shifted from attempts to reduce the levels of the phenols reported to be promoters or cocarcinogens to attempts to reduce the levels of vapor-phase components reported to be ciliastatic. These vapor-phase components included the simpler, volatile phenols which equilibrate between MSS vapor phase and particulate phase. From 1963 to 1972, a great variety of filter-tip additives were examined with respect to their ability to remove specific MSS components reported to be ciliastatic in in vitro experiments. After the Kensler-Battista publications, numerous publications appeared on the reduction of the delivery of ciliastatic components by filter tips (893a), on the ciliastatic action of nicotine (178), and on the ciliastatic activity of phenol (295). In a preliminary study, Rodgman et al. (3306) examined the removal of water-soluble vapor-phase ciliastatic components from cigarette MSS by saliva and mucous secretions in the upper respiratory tract. They reported that the levels of representative ciliastats such as the aldehydes and ketones were substantially reduced in the oral cavity, resulting in a diminution of the levels reaching the ciliated tissue in the lower respiratory tract. Rodgman et al. also emphasized that such oral cavity absorption of water-soluble ciliastats did not substantially affect the levels of ciliastatic components in the particulate phase. External impetus for this investigation was provided by comments in the Advisory Committee’s 1964 Report to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999) on the possible oral cavity removal of water-soluble ciliastats, by comments by Dalhamn *
Because of its vapor pressure properties, phenol is present in both the particulate phase and the vapor phase of cigarette MSS aerosol. Thus, it is amenable to removal from the vapor phase by selective filtration and to reduction of its level in the particulate phase by all the technologies whereby MSS particulate phase or “tar” delivery is reduced, for example, filtration efficiency, air dilution (increased paper porosity, filter-tip ventilation), and inclusion of expanded tobacco in the blend.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
and his colleagues (893a, 894b) on the ciliastatic activity of filtered and nonfiltered cigarette MSS and by Wynder (4301). In 1965, Wynder et al. (4304) wrote: The principal volatile ciliatoxic components appear to be water-soluble … Important considerations are the temperature of the respiratory tract … and the nature of the overlying mucous coat, the layer that all ciliastatic components penetrate to act upon cilia …
In their study, Rodgman et al. (3306) showed that passage of cigarette MSS over moistened filter paper strips substantially reduced the levels of the vapor-phase ciliastats but did not produce much effect on the “tar” delivery. Rodgman and Cook (3289) examined a variety of carbon-containing filter tips and found that the delivery of several vapor-phase ciliastats (the aldehydes and ketones) could be reduced substantially by some of them. In some instances, the ciliastatic components adsorbed on the carbon were eluted from the carbon as the fire cone approached the filter tip and the filter tip temperature was increased. As a result, the levels of these components were inordinately increased in the last few puffs from the cigarette. RJRT was not the only U.S. tobacco company interested in the removal of water-soluble ciliastats from cigarette MSS. † Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories (3A12), under contract to RJRT, conducted a series of studies on in vitro ciliastasis of cigarette MSS from 1964 through 1967. Major findings included: (1) The theory of reduction of the levels of ciliastats in the smoke stream by moist surfaces was confirmed. (2) The ciliastatic activity of the MSS particulate phase was essentially unchanged by passage over moist surfaces. (3) The ciliastatic activity of cigarette MSS was substantially reduced by passage of the MSS through a carbon-containing filter tip. In 1966, Dalhamn (891a) and Dalhamn and Rylander (893c) reported on the effect of filtration on the delivery of ciliastatic compounds in MSS. They reported that in vitro ciliastats were present in both the vapor and particulate phases of MSS. In their 1964 lengthy review and 1967 book, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) commented on ciliastasis induced by cigarette MSS: All studies reported to date have shown that cigarette smoke affects the metachronic activity of cilia, a motion that is necessary to propel the viscid mucoid mass. During inhalation, in the absence of effectively beating cilia, mucus flow slows down and perhaps stops. At that time, components in cigarette smoke may act upon the underlying cells, as can the entrapped particles. †
In 1965, American Tobacco marketed the Waterford cigarette whose filter contained encapsulated water. Prior to smoking the cigarette, the smoker would gently squeeze the filter tip, rupture the capsules to release the encapsulated water which would spread throughout the interstices between the filter-tip fibers. Water-soluble MSS vapor-phase components would be “scrubbed” from the smoke stream. The Waterford had a very short life in the marketplace.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 224
11/24/08 12:21:19 PM
225
Aldehydes and Ketones
In their mid-1960s publications, Wynder and Hoffmann commented several times on the fact that most of the known ciliastatic components of MSS demonstrated to be ciliastatic in various in vitro systems were water soluble and this property would markedly influence their fate and behavior during and after inhalation. Wynder and Hoffmann (4330) noted: As far as human smoking habits are concerned, it remains also to be estimated to which extent volatile smoke components reach the bronchial tree. Preliminary studies indicate that a significant proportion of the gaseous components is being retained within the oral cavity.
Later, Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 542 in (4332)] wrote: Water-soluble volatile components, which are primarily responsible for the results of the acute in vitro short-term cilia toxicity tests, are, to a large extent, removed when cigarette smoke contacts the saliva in the mouth and the abundant secretions of the trachea and main bronchi.
They added [see p. 646 in (4332)]: In man’s manner of smoking, however, volatile components are retained to a significant degree in the oral cavity and may, therefore, be far less important than when tested experimentally.
These words, perhaps prophetic, were shown to be true by Dalhamn et al. (892), who reported in 1968 that as much as 60% of the water-soluble (and ciliastatic) components of cigarette MSS were absorbed in the oral cavity of the human smoker, whereas the absorption of water-insoluble (and nonciliastatic) components such as isoprene was low (about 20%). They also reported that about 16% of the MSS particulate matter was retained in the mouth. Mouth absorption of acetaldehyde and acetone averaged about 57%. Earlier, Rodgman et al. (3306) had conducted a study similar to but much less elaborate than that of Dalhamn et al. (892). Rodgman et al. studied the mouth absorption of components of the MSS from five different brands: The total absorption of all vaporphase aldehydes and ketones averaged 53%; the absorption of isoprene averaged less than 10%. The more than a dozen cigarette brands tipped with carbon-containing filter tips were already losing market share by the time Dalhamn et al. reported the results of their study of the mouth absorption of water-soluble vapor-phase components (892). Their scientific communication, plus the consumer unacceptable “carbon-filter” off-taste, produced not only a further reduction of sales but also diminished interest, both within and outside of the tobacco industry, in vapor-phase ciliastats as participants in respiratory problems attributed to cigarette MSS. From 1968 through 1972, study continued not only at RJRT R&D but also throughout the tobacco industry on ways to reduce the levels of vapor-phase components, many of which were reported to be ciliastatic in in vitro systems. The major effort was aimed at reducing the level of hydrogen cyanide (a potent in vitro ciliastat) because of its level in cigarette
MSS (about 200 to 400 µg from a cigarette delivering 15 to 25 mg of FTC “tar”), its toxicity (other than ciliastasis) when examined alone, and the fact that consumers would be more familiar with the toxic properties of hydrogen cyanide (also known as hydrocyanic acid or “cyanide”) than with the toxic properties of MSS components such as acrolein or phenol. Most of the effort during this period dealt with filter-tip additives other than carbon. Thus, in the late 1960s it was known that in vitro ciliastatic components in the vapor phase of MSS were not reaching the ciliated areas of the respiratory tract in the concentrations first considered to be a problem and the levels of the ciliastatic components in the MSS particulate phase could be controlled by the filtration methods used to control “tar” delivery. Another technology to control the per cigarette deliveries of both vapor-phase and/or particulate-phase MSS components (whether they be ciliastatic or not) was air dilution via filter-tip ventilation. At RJRT R&D, basic research on this cigarette design technology, subsequently classified as significant in the generation of a “safer” or “less hazardous” cigarette, was pursued into the mid-1970s (3116a, 3119a, 3120). Dalhamn (891c) stated with regard to a “less hazardous” cigarette: If … one were to venture a reply to the question of what a less hazardous cigarette would be like, I cannot for the moment find a better one than that given by Rylander and myself [to the 1968 Consumer Subcommittee of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce]: Our belief, based upon the scientific knowledge available at present, is that the only way to guarantee a reduction in the harmful effects of inhaled smoke is to decrease the overall exposure. This can be done by reducing the number of cigarettes smoked or by using filter cigarettes, provided the reduction brought about by the filter will equal in all respects and for all potentially hazardous compounds the reduction in dose obtained if the number of cigarettes is reduced. Due to the limited amount of data and the difficulty of extrapolating from laboratory findings to man, we believe that a reduction of only selected components of cigarette smoke cannot be accompanied by a statement guaranteeing a reduction in the harmful effects of inhaled smoke.
The topic dealing with ciliastasis and MSS ciliastats (from testing in in vitro systems) is of particular interest with respect to the ETS situation because of the data showing:
1. The major ciliastatic components in tobacco smoke are water soluble. These include formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, ethyl carbamate, and hydrazine:* all are water-soluble tobacco smoke components that appear as tumorigens
*
Other water-soluble tobacco smoke components categorized as ciliastats on the basis of in vitro test results include ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, acrolein, acetone, nitrogen dioxide, and low molecular weight phenols. The phenols are distributed between the particulate and vapor phases of tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 225
11/24/08 12:21:20 PM
226
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-6 In vitro Ciliary Activity, Cigarette Smoke Fractions, and Dose Level Smoke Fraction From Which Aqueous Extract was Obtained Phenolic fraction Acidic fraction c Neutral fraction “Insoluble” fraction Basic fraction
% Of Smokea
Immediate & Complete Ciliastasis at Dcb
9.3 (16.0)d 2.2 (11.0) 47.2 (0.9) 14.0 (20.0) 8.7 (65.0)
Complete Ciliastasis in 10-40 min at D10
0.03 0.04 — 1.1 1.95
0.015 0.02 0.27 0.55 0.98
No Apparent Ciliastasis at Do
Dc/Do
0.002 0.007 0.034 0.055 0.08
15 6 8e 20 24
The unit for Dc, D10, and Do is g/100 ml. The values for each fraction as a percentage of total smoke condensate were previously described by Wynder and Hoffmann (4311, 4312) c Phenol-free. d Number in parentheses is percentage of smoke fraction that is soluble in water. e Value for D10/Do. a
b
on the various published lists of tumorigens in tobacco smoke (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744). 2. Dose reduction (effectively, dilution) of MSS or some of its “ciliastatic” components or ciliastatic fractions eventually results in a dose or concentration level at which no ciliastasis is produced in the in vitro systems used. 3. A large proportion of the inhaled MSS components categorized as ciliastats (and in some instances as tumorigens) does not reach the ciliated areas of the respiratory tract because of their removal from the smoke stream during passage over the moist tissues of the mouth and trachea [see Rodgman et al. (3306), Dalhamn et al. (892)]). 4. Ciliastatic compounds inhaled nasally are removed from the inhaled gas stream by “resorption.”
This raises the question as to how much formaldehyde or acetaldehyde or crotonaldehyde in ETS, an already extremely dilute system, will reach the lung whether inhaled orally or nasally! Are the levels of these tobacco smoke components in ETS sufficient for these compounds to be included on the Hoffmann and Hecht list (1727), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) list (2825), the Hoffmann and Hoffmann lists (1740, 1741, 1743), or the Hoffmann et al. list (1744)?
Ciliastasis Studies with Cigarette Smoke Condensate Fractions Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) and Wynder et al. (4350) in their study with mussels of the ciliastatic activity of aqueous extracts of various fractions of cigarette smoke condensate demonstrated that reduction of the applied dose of each of the fractions tested eventually changed the ciliastasis from “immediate and complete” to “none.” Their findings are summarized in Table III-6. Calculation of the ratio Dc/Do, where Dc is the dose producing “immediate and complete” ciliastasis and Do is the dose producing “zero” ciliastasis, gives values ranging from
6 to 24, that is, a 24-fold dilution of every mainstream cigarette smoke condensate fraction tested in this study resulted in or would result in a non-ciliastatic situation. The data in Table III-6 originally presented at the annual AACR meeting by Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) were subsequently published, but in less detail, by Wynder et al. (4350).
Ciliastasis Studies With Individual Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Components Examination of the in vitro ciliastasis produced by a variety of MSS components reveals that for all components studied there is a level below which no ciliastasis is observed. Guillerm et al. (1451a) reported the results of their study of the effect of various MSS components in the in vitro system, ciliated rat trachea. Concentrations less than those shown in Table III-7 produced no ciliastasis in ciliated rat trachea. All of the compounds listed in Table III-7 are primarily vaporphase components of MSS. Wynder et al. (4350) in their study of the phenolic components of cigarette smoke also reported that reduction of
Table III-7 Lowest Concentrations in Ringer Solution Leading to Ciliastasis in Ciliated Rat Trachea Compound Propenal Formaldehydea Acetaldehydea Propanal Propanal, 2-methyl2-Furaldehyde 2-Butanone 2-Propanone a
Concentration, µg/L 90 200 3000 3500 4500 7500 80000 100000
On various lists of tobacco smoke tumorigens (1727, 1740, 2825).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 226
11/24/08 12:21:20 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
the concentrations of solutions of the simple phenols (phenol, o-cresol, m-cresol, p-cresol, o-ethylphenol, and 2,4-dimethylphenol) from 1.0% to 0.05% (a 20:1 dilution) reduced the ciliary activity of each solution in an in vitro system (ciliated mussel tissue) to zero: At the highest concentration (1.0%), the phenol derivatives demonstrated greater ciliastatic effects than did phenol itself. At the lowest concentrations tested (0.05%), none of the phenols induced ciliastasis.
Nose Inhalation of Environmental Tobacco Smoke vs. Mouth Inhalation of Mainstream Smoke On several occasions, Rodgman (3255, 3255a, 3257) discussed the effect of water solubility of tobacco smoke components reported to be ciliastatic in in vitro systems on the ultimate exposure of the smoker’s lungs to MSS or the nonsmoker’s lungs to ETS. Early in the study of the effect of MSS components on ciliary activity in in vitro systems, it was realized that all of the MSS components (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, hydrogen cyanide, formic acid, acetic acid, etc.) that produced ciliastasis in the in vitro systems were water soluble. This observation led to proposals by Dalhamn and Sjoholm (894b), Dalhamn and Rylander (893a), Rodgman et al. (3306), Wynder (4301), USPHS (3999), Wynder et al. (4304, 4305), and Wynder and Hoffmann (4332, 4342) that this water solubility would result in removal of substantial amounts of the in vitro ciliastatic components from the MSS by their solution in the aqueous fluids coating the surfaces of the oral cavity and trachea during the time that the MSS was held in and/or traversed these portions of the respiratory tract. The levels of ciliastats reaching the ciliated areas in the smoker’s lower respiratory tract would produce insignificant ciliastasis, if any at all. This “scrubbing” of ciliastatic components from the inspired MSS stream was demonstrated in smokers by Rodgman et al. (3306) and Dalhamn et al. (892, 893). Nasally inhaled components are removed in the nasal cavity by “resorption,” a process similar to the “scrubbing” of water-soluble components from gas streams such as MSS vapor phase. Dalhamn, in his 1961 study of ciliastatic activity, demonstrated that sulfur dioxide was a powerful ciliastat in vitro at or below 100 ppm but did not produce ciliastasis in vivo at or below 100 ppm because much of the sulfur dioxide was removed in the nasal cavity (891a). Sulfur dioxide was subsequently identified as a minor tobacco smoke vapor-phase component (3882). Dalhamn (891a) found that in rabbits exposed to 300, 200, and 100 ppm of sulfur dioxide, the percentage showing cessation of ciliary activity within 45 min was 90, 60, and 0, respectively. Removal of inhaled components in the nasal cavity, termed “resorption,” is similar to the “scrubbing” of water-soluble components from gas streams, such as the MSS vapor phase. This nasal resorption is an important process not only from a ciliastasis-MSS component point of view but also from an ETS point of view
227
since ETS, in contrast to MSS which is primarily inhaled via the mouth, is inhaled primarily through the nose. ETS vaporphase components that would be removed through resorption in the nasal cavity include formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, hydrazine, and possibly ethyl carbamate, five MSS components listed by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) as “tumorigens” in MSS. Thus, very little, if any, of these watersoluble components, already highly diluted in ETS, would reach the lungs and the ciliated tissue to be involved in lung cancer causation attributed to ETS by some authors. As noted by Aviado (126a), data from inhalation studies in animals indicate it is unlikely that either formaldehyde or hydrazine contribute to pulmonary carcinogenesis. In 1965, Dalhamn and Rylander (893b) commented on the possible differences in the effects produced by mouth inhalation vs. nose inhalation of tobacco smoke: The most important point is probably that the smoke is administered through the mouth. If smoke is administered through the nose quite different absorption conditions are present, and it is likely that the smoke which enters the lungs differs considerably from that inhaled through the mouth. This could also be one of the factors which explains why in animal experiments no tumor-producing effects have been found by tobacco smoke in inhalation studies where the smoke was administered through the nose.
In 1968, Dalhamn et al. published the results of their studies with humans on the mouth absorption (892) and lung retention (893) of various components of cigarette smoke. As noted earlier, the findings that a substantial percentage of the levels of MSS water-soluble components demonstrated to be ciliastatic in vitro is absorbed in the oral cavity lessened the interest in ciliastasis produced by MSS components. The data generated by Dalhamn et al. also served a second useful purpose in that they demonstrated: (1) the remarkable difference, albeit with respect to only a few MSS smoke components, between the compositions of inhaled and exhaled MSS, and (2) all of the few components measured in the inhaled MSS were found in the exhaled MSS, that is, none was 100% retained in the lungs, etc., nor 100% absorbed in the oral cavity. These data are summarized in Tables III-8 and III-9. It is obvious that mouth absorptions of such water-soluble ciliastats as acetaldehyde (60%) and acetone (56%) are substantial (Table III-8), whereas the mouth absorptions of the relatively water-insoluble components isoprene (20%), toluene (28%), and CO (3%) are much less. The data in Table III-9 are derived from those of Dalhamn et al. (892, 893). The change in the composition of the MSS delivered by the cigarette to the composition of the MSS exhaled by the smoker is readily seen from the ratios, for example, acetaldehyde is inhaled by the smoker at a ratio of 31.3 µg/mg total particulate matter but is exhaled at a ratio of 8.3 µg/mg total particulate matter; acetone is inhaled at a ratio of 19.0 µg/mg total particulate matter but exhaled at a ratio of 66.7 µg/mg total particulate matter. Similarly, the MSS composition is altered by holding the smoke in the mouth without
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 227
11/24/08 12:21:20 PM
228
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-8 Lung Retention and Mouth Absorption of Several Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Components Per Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Inhalation into Lungs Smoke Component Acetaldehyde, µg Acetone, µg Acetonitrile, µg Isoprene, µg Toluene, µg CO, mg TPM, mg a b
Delivery
Retention
%
940 570 320 560 250 30.0b 30.0
930 490 282 554 232 16.2 28.8
99 86 91 99 93 54 96
Held in Mouth for 2 sec Exhaled 10 80 28 6 18 13.8 1.2
Absorbed in Moutha 560 320 230 110 70 0.9 4.8
%
Exhaled
60 56 74 20 28 3 16
380 250 80 450 180 29.1 25.2
No inhalation Per cigarette CO yield assumed to be the same as per cigarette TPM yield.
inhalation. Since these exhaled smokes, whether originally inhaled, held in the mouth with no or minimal inhalation, or some blend of both (inhalation and mouth retention ultimately contribute to ETS), it is obvious that the contribution is not equivalent quantitatively to the MSS originally generated by the cigarette. The data presented by Dalhamn et al. (892, 893) on lung retention of MSS components were similar to data reported earlier by Laskowski (2267) and to data on lung retention and mouth absorption of ciliastats by Rodgman et al. (3306). The various sets of data are summarized in Table III-10. Each set of data indicates that exhaled MSS is substantially different quantitatively from the inhaled MSS. If cigarette MSS is mouth inhaled and held for any length of time (a few seconds) in the mouth prior to being drawn into the lungs, some of the MSS water-soluble vapor-phase components are “scrubbed” from the smoke stream and reach the ciliated areas at much reduced concentrations. This is also true to a lesser degree for water-soluble components of the particulate phase (see Tables III-8, III-9, and III-10).
The exposure of the lungs to “resorbed” entities alleged to be tumorigenic will be much less than some authors claim. Similarly, in nose inhalation of ETS, some of its water-soluble components (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, ethyl carbamate, hydrazine)—alleged to be tumorigenic at the levels in MSS—will be “resorbed” in the nasal cavity and reach ciliated areas at concentrations reduced not only by the “resorption” mechanism but also by the dilution inherent in ETS generation from exhaled MSS and sidestream smoke produced during inter- and intrapuff smoldering. The exposure of the lungs to these “tumorigens”’ will obviously be substantially less than some writers claim. Thus, these mechanisms—“scrubbing” and “resorption”— effective in substantially diminishing the amounts of MSS water-soluble in vitro ciliastats that reach the lung during active smoking will be operative during ETS inhalation, whether oral or nasal, and diminish the amounts of the same and similar ETS components that reach the lung. This diminution in amounts will be particularly pertinent in the case of the smoke components formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, crotonaldehyde,
Table III-9 Difference Between Composition of Inhaled and Exhaled Mainstream Smoke and Between Mouth-Held and Exhaled Mainstream Smoke Per Cigarette Ratios, µg/g TPM or µg/g TPM Smoke Component Acetaldehyde, µg Acetone, µg Acetonitrile, µg Isoprene, µg Toluene, µg CO, mg TPM, mg a b
Delivery Ratio
Inhalation into Lungs and Exhaled, Exhaled MSS Ratio
Held in Mouth for 2 seca and Exhaled, Exhaled MSS Ratio
31.3 19.0 10.3 18.7 8.3 1.0b 1.0
8.3 66.7 23.3 5.0 15.0 11.5 1.0
15.1 9.9 3.2 17.9 3.2 1.15 1.0
No inhalation Per cigarette CO yield assumed to be the same as per cigarette TPM yield
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 228
11/24/08 12:21:21 PM
229
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-10 Lung Retention and Mouth Absorption Data % Retention or Absorption Laskowski (2267)
Rodgman et al. (3306)
Dalhamn et al. (892, 893)
Smoke Component
LRa
MAa
LR
MA
LR
MA
Aldehydes & ketonesb Acetaldehyde Acetone Acetonitrile Isoprene Toluene TPM Nicotine Pyridine Ammonia Phenols Carboxylic acids CO
99 —c — — — — — 67 98 98 57 44 —
— — — — — — — — — 56 — — —
80–90 — — — 80–92 — 80–90 — — — — — —
40–67 — — — 5-10 — 10–15 — — — — — —
— 99 86 91 99 93 96 — — — — — 54
— 60 56 74 20 28 16 — — — — — 3
LR = percentage retained in lungs; MA = percentage absorbed in mouth About 70 to 75% of the volatile aldehydes and ketones in MSS is acetaldehyde plus acetone. For cigarettes in the 1950s and 1960s, the acetaldehyde:acetone ratio approximated 2:1. c — = not determined. a
b
ethyl carbamate, and hydrazine on the Hoffmann and Hoffmann “List of 60” (1740). The following paragraphs include comments about two of the much researched smoke components formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Formaldehyde yields in cigarette range from 3.4 µg for filtered cigarettes to 283 µg in unfiltered cigarettes (2564, 3427). This compound is usually found in the vapor phase. The suggested formation mechanism for formaldehyde is destructive distillation and pyrolysis of celluloses, starch, pectins, lignin, and sugars [Burton (535), Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722), Gager et al. (1264, 1265), Green (1351), Johnson et al. (1960), Stedman (3797)]. In both indoor and outdoor air in the United States, formaldehyde is usually present at the generally nonirritating level of approximately 0.06 ppm (1145a). In May 1992, OSHA ruled the exposure limit to formaldehyde be reduced from 3 ppm to 0.75 ppm (2683a). Although most significant exposure to formaldehyde is generally industrial, it also naturally occurs in food, for example, fruits and vegetables (2111b). Levels of formaldehyde in fruits and vegetables range from 3.3 µg/g in spinach to 17.3 µg/g in apples (3986a). Formaldehyde is tumorigenic and mutagenic only at doses many-fold higher than that seen in cigarette MSS. Whether formaldehyde is mutagenic at noncytotoxic doses remains controversial due to the small number of studies and the variability of results (1873a). Formaldehyde reportedly has been found to induce aneuploidy (2363a, 2868a). In addition, results from some studies have suggested that humans routinely exposed to formaldehyde display increases in chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral lymphocytes. However, rodents treated with formaldehyde in vivo
gave negative results for chromosomal aberrations and assays for lethal mutations. Additional rodent studies on DNA damage showed unconvincing results as well (1873a). The overall tumorigenicity of formaldehyde was tested in two strains of rats and one strain of mice. Significant increases in squamous cell carcinomas of the nasal cavity were observed in both rat strains after inhaling highly cytotoxic doses of formaldehyde. However, no carcinomas were observed in any of the mice inhaling the same dose (2086a). In other studies to evaluate formaldehyde tumorigenicity, mice and hamsters were exposed via inhalation, rats via subcutaneous injection, and rabbits via exposure in oral tanks. At the time, the results from these studies were considered inadequate to evaluate the tumorigenic risk to humans. Although formaldehyde was tumorigenic in rats when administered at very high dose levels (2610a, 3789b), the evidence of its tumorigenicity in humans was considered by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to be inadequate, until 2005 (3A03). Recently, IARC reevaluated the evidence on formaldehyde and reclassified it as a Group 1 human carcinogen (3A16). As noted previously, the reported MSS yield of acetaldehyde ranged from 18 µg/cigarette (1853a) to 2815 µg/cigarette (2564) for nonfiltered cigarettes. However, a substantial difference exists between the analytically derived yields of acetaldehyde and other water-soluble vapor-phase components reported to be ciliastatic and the smoker’s exposure to them. Dalhamn et al. (892) described how a substantial percentage of water-soluble components such as acetaldehyde are removed from the vapor phase of the smoke stream by solution in the aqueous fluids coating the oral cavity, thus never reaching the upper or lower respiratory tract. The
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 229
11/24/08 12:21:21 PM
230
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
proposed mechanisms of formation for acetaldehyde are destructive distillation and pyrolysis and its major precursors are reported to be the celluloses, pectins, starch, lignin, and sugars [Burton (535), Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722), Gager et al. (1264, 1265), Green (1351), Johnson et al. (1960), Stedman (3797)]. Additional complexities exist regarding the predictability of biological activity. For example, a significant amount of vapor-phase water-soluble components such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are “scrubbed” from the smoke stream into solution by the fluids coating the oral cavity and upper respiratory tract; thus they reach the lung at a diminished level (892, 893). Similarly, only a modest percentage of a waterinsoluble component such as isoprene is retained by the smoker because a significant portion of it is exhaled. In light of these phenomena and the fragmentary nature of the data on actual exposure and retention, the possible physiological effect of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and isoprene at the cited cigarette MSS delivery ranges cannot be extrapolated. Very few studies have been performed in which a smoking machine or system was modified to approximate the effect of oral cavity fluids on the retention of specific MSS components. It has been known since the early 1950s and confirmed
in the 1960s that different classes of smoke components are retained to different degrees by the smoker (892, 2267, 3255, 3257, 3306). Thus, the composition of the cigarette MSS retained by the smoker is significantly different from that exhaled by the smoker. Also, both the biologically retained and exhaled smokes are obviously different compositionally from the cigarette MSS retained and analyzed by the smoking machine-collection system. While much emphasis was placed on the aldehyde and ketone components in the vapor phase of cigarette MSS because of their in vitro ciliastatic activity, much research was also conducted after the mid-1950s to identify aldehyde and ketone components in the particulate phase of cigarette MSS primarily because many were found to contribute consumer acceptable flavor and aroma properties to the MSS. As noted by Rodgman (3266), many of the aldehydes and ketones used by the tobacco industry in its flavor formulations [see listing by Doull et al. (1053)] are known components of untreated tobacco and/or its smoke. Thus, such additives are not strangers to the tobacco and/or its smoke but their addition increases the consumer acceptable flavorants. Table III-11 lists some of the tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components that have been or are used in flavor formulations.
Table III-11 Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Aldehydes and Ketones Used in Flavor Formulations CAS No.
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
Smoke
Tobacco
benzaldehyde p-ethoxybenzaldehyde salicylaldehyde vanillin veratraldehyde o-tolualdehyde m-tolualdehyde p-tolualdehyde cuminaldehyde phenylacetaldehyde 2-phenyl-2-butenal piperonal 2-methylbutyraldehyde 3-methylbutyraldehyde trans, trans-2,4-decadienal decanal hexanal 2-hexenal valeraldehyde isobutyraldehyde cinnamaldehyde 5-methyl-2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde 2-tridecenal
+ — + + — + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + —
+ — + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + +
1,3-butanediol 2,3-butanedione
+ +
+ +
Aldehydes 100-52-7 10031-82-0 90-02-8 121-33-5 120-14-9 529-20-4 620-23-5 104-87-0 122-03-2 122-78-1 4411-89-6 120-57-0 96-17-3 590-86-3 25152-84-5 112-31-2 66-25-1 6728-26-3 110-62-3 78-84-2 104-55-2 13679-70-4 7774-82-5
Benzaldehyde Benzaldehyde, 4-ethoxyBenzaldehyde, 2-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyBenzaldehyde, 3,4-dimethoxyBenzaldehyde, 2-methylBenzaldehyde, 3-methylBenzaldehyde, 4-methylBenzaldehyde, 4-(1-methylethyl)Benzeneacetaldehyde Benzeneacetaldehyde, α-ethylidene1,3-Benzodioxole-5-carboxaldehyde Butanal, 2-methylButanal, 3-methyl2,4-Decadienal Decanal {capraldehyde} Hexanal {caproic aldehyde} 2-Hexenal, (E) Pentanal Propanal, 2-methyl2-Propenal, 3-phenyl2-Thiophenecarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl2-Tridecenal
107-88-0 431-03-8
1,3-Butanediol 2,3-Butanedione {diacetyl}
Ketones
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 230
11/24/08 12:21:21 PM
231
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-11 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Aldehydes and Ketones Used in Flavor Formulations CAS No. 78-93-3 513-86-0 5471-51-2 23696-85-7 35044-68-9 23726-92-3 623-15-4 122-57-6 127-41-3 14901-07-6 89-80-5 1125-21-9 13215-88-8 99-49-0 89-81-6 6091-50-5 13494-06-9 13494-07-0 80-71-7 100-06-1 98-86-2 32974-92-8 1193-79-9 122-00-9 1333-52-4 22047-25-2 1122-62-9 350-03-8 1072-83-9 24295-03-2 110-43-0 5166-53-0 119-61-9 1937-54-8 821-55-6 600-14-6 123-76-2 107-87-9 141-79-7 127-17-3 4940-11-8 118-71-8 593-08-8 3796-70-1 112-12-9
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
Smoke
Tobacco
2-Butanone 2-Butanone, 3-hydroxy2-Butanone, 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadien-1-yl){β-damascenone} 2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enyl)- {β-damascone} 3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2-furanyl)3-Buten-2-one, 4-phenyl3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)Cyclohexanone, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)2-Cyclohexene-1,4-dione, 2,6,6-trimethyl2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2--(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl2-Cyclohexen-I-one, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,4-dimethyl1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,5-dimethyl2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methylEthanone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)Ethanone, 1-phenylEthanone, 1-(5-ethylpyrazintl)Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl 5-methyl)Ethanone, 1-(4-methylphenyl)Ethanone, 1-(naphthalenyl)Ethanone, 1-pyrazinylEthanone, 1-(2-pyridinyl)Ethanone, 1-(3-pyridinyl)Ethanone, 1-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)Ethanone, 1-(2-thiazolyl)2-Heptanone 3-Hexen-2-one, 5-methylMethanone, diphenyl6,8-Nonadien-2-one, 8-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)2-Nonanone 2,3-Pentanedione Pentanoic acid, 4-oxo2-Pentanone 3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl- {mesityl oxide} Propanoic acid, 2-oxo4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-ethyl4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl2-Tridecanone 5,9-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl- {geranylacetone} 2-Undecanone
2-butanone acetoin 4-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone 4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexa-1,3-dienyl)-but-2en-4-one 4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-2-enyl)-but-2-en-4one 4-(2-furyl)-3-buten-2-one 4-phenyl-3-buten-2-one α-ionone β-ionone l-menthone 2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-2-ene-1,4-dione 4-(2-butylidene-3,5,5-trimethyl)-2-cyclohexen1-one l-carvone d-piperitone
+ + + +
+ + — +
+
+
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ —
+ +
3,4-dimethyl-1,2-cyclopentanedione 3,5-dimethyl-1,2-cyclopentanedione methylcyclopentenolone acetanisole acetophenone 2-acetyl-3-ethylpyrazine 2-acetyl-5-methylfuran 4-methylacetophenone methyl naphthyl ketone acetylpyrazine 2-acetylpyridine 3-acetylpyridine methyl 2-pyrrolyl ketone 2-acetylthiazole 2-heptanone 5-methyl-3-hexen-2-one benzophenone solanone 2-nonanone 2,3-pentanedione levulinic acid 2-pentanone 4-methyl-3-penten-2-one pyruvic acid ethylmaltol maltol 2-tridecanone 6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one 2-undecanone
+ + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — — +
— — + + + — + + — + + + + — + + — + + — + + + + — + + + +
Tables III-12 and III-13 list the aldehydes and ketones, respectively, reported as tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components. The aldehydes number 263, with 143 identified in tobacco smoke, 199 in tobacco, and 79 in both. The ketones
number 1090, of which 656 have been identified in smoke, 647 in tobacco, and 213 in both. Table III-14 depicts the chronology of many of the studies on aldehydes and ketones in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 231
11/24/08 12:21:21 PM
232
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 232
11/24/08 12:21:22 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
233
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 233
11/24/08 12:21:22 PM
234
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 234
11/24/08 12:21:27 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
235
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 235
11/24/08 12:21:28 PM
236
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 236
11/24/08 12:21:29 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
237
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 237
11/24/08 12:21:30 PM
238
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 238
11/24/08 12:21:31 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
239
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 239
11/24/08 12:21:32 PM
240
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 240
11/24/08 12:21:33 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
241
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 241
11/24/08 12:21:35 PM
242
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 242
11/24/08 12:21:36 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
243
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 243
11/24/08 12:21:37 PM
244
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 244
11/24/08 12:21:38 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
245
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 245
11/24/08 12:21:39 PM
246
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 246
11/24/08 12:21:40 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
247
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued ) © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 247
11/24/08 12:21:41 PM
248
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-12 (Continued) Aldehydes in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 248
11/24/08 12:21:42 PM
249
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-13 Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 249
11/24/08 12:21:45 PM
250
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 250
11/24/08 12:21:46 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
251
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 251
11/24/08 12:21:47 PM
252
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 252
11/24/08 12:21:48 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
253
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 253
11/24/08 12:21:49 PM
254
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 254
11/24/08 12:21:50 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
255
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 255
11/24/08 12:21:51 PM
256
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 256
11/24/08 12:21:54 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
257
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 257
11/24/08 12:21:54 PM
258
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 258
11/24/08 12:21:55 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
259
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 259
11/24/08 12:21:56 PM
260
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 260
11/24/08 12:21:57 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
261
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 261
11/24/08 12:21:58 PM
262
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 262
11/24/08 12:21:59 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
263
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 263
11/24/08 12:22:00 PM
264
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 264
11/24/08 12:22:02 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
265
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 265
11/24/08 12:22:03 PM
266
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 266
11/24/08 12:22:04 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
267
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 267
11/24/08 12:22:05 PM
268
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 268
11/24/08 12:22:06 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
269
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 269
11/24/08 12:22:07 PM
270
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 270
11/24/08 12:22:08 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
271
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 271
11/24/08 12:22:09 PM
272
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 272
11/24/08 12:22:10 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
273
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 273
11/24/08 12:22:11 PM
274
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 274
11/24/08 12:22:12 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
275
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 275
11/24/08 12:22:13 PM
276
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 276
11/24/08 12:22:14 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
277
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 277
11/24/08 12:22:15 PM
278
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 278
11/24/08 12:22:16 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
279
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 279
11/24/08 12:22:17 PM
280
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 280
11/24/08 12:22:18 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
281
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 281
11/24/08 12:22:19 PM
282
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 282
11/24/08 12:22:21 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
283
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 283
11/24/08 12:22:22 PM
284
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 284
11/24/08 12:22:23 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
285
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 285
11/24/08 12:22:24 PM
286
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 286
11/24/08 12:22:25 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
287
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 287
11/24/08 12:22:26 PM
288
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 288
11/24/08 12:22:27 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
289
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 289
11/24/08 12:22:28 PM
290
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 290
11/24/08 12:22:29 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
291
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 291
11/24/08 12:22:30 PM
292
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 292
11/24/08 12:22:31 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
293
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 293
11/24/08 12:22:32 PM
294
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 294
11/24/08 12:22:33 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
295
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 295
11/24/08 12:22:34 PM
296
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 296
11/24/08 12:22:35 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
297
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 297
11/24/08 12:22:36 PM
298
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 298
11/24/08 12:22:37 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
299
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 299
11/24/08 12:22:38 PM
300
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 300
11/24/08 12:22:39 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
301
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 301
11/24/08 12:22:41 PM
302
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 302
11/24/08 12:22:42 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
303
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 303
11/24/08 12:22:43 PM
304
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 304
11/24/08 12:22:44 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
305
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 305
11/24/08 12:22:45 PM
306
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 306
11/24/08 12:22:46 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
307
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 307
11/24/08 12:22:47 PM
308
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 308
11/24/08 12:22:48 PM
Aldehydes and Ketones
309
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 309
11/24/08 12:22:49 PM
310
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 310
11/24/08 12:22:50 PM
311
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-13 (Continued) Ketones in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Table III-14 Chronology of Studies on Aldehydes and Ketones in Tobacco Smoke NOTE: While many of the following items deal with the identification and quantitation of formaldehyde in cigarette MSS, SSS, and ETS, the evidence for the presence of formaldehyde (H2C=O) per se is scant. Data indicate that formaldehyde is present as its hydrate, i.e., as dihydroxymethane [H2C(OH)2], which in most instances behaves chemically and biologically the same as formaldehyde. Year
Event
1843 1859 1867 1904 1909 1926 1927 1931
Acrolein (propenal) was first identified as a component in the destructive distillate from fat by Redtenbacher (3093b). Formaldehyde (methanal) was discovered by Butlerov (3A02). Formaldehyde was rediscovered by A.W. Von Hofmann (3A24). Thoms (3912) reported the presence of formaldehyde in cigarette smoke. From his toxicologic study of cigarette smoke, Lehmann (2343) reported the presence of formaldehyde in cigarette smoke. Neuberg and Kobel in their study of the aldehydes reported the presence of several aldehydes, including formaldehyde (2702a). Neuberg and Ottenstein (2706) report the presence of formaldehyde in tobacco smoke. Neuberg and Burkard (2701) reported the presence of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, butyraldehyde (butanal), 3-hydroxybutyraldehyde (3-hydroxybutanal, aldol), benzaldehyde, 3-pentanone, and 4-heptanone in cigarette smoke. McNally (2524) reported the presence of formaldehyde and acrolein (propenal) in tobacco smoke. Pfyl (2937) confirmed the finding of Neuberg and Burkard (2701) on the presence of acetaldehyde in tobacco smoke. In his study of the irritant factors in cigarette smoke, Bogen (1936) classified formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein (propenal) as “irritant factors” in cigarette smoke and rated formaldehyde as a major contributor to cigarette smoke irritation. Prentiss (2988a) reported that acrolein (propenal) was a powerful lachrymator; even at 3 ppm (7mg/m3) acrolein was reported to be highly irritating to the conjunctiva and to the respiratory tract. Proetz (2991a) attributed ciliastasis on upper respiratory tract mucosa of rabbits exposed to cigarette smoke to the aldehydes in the smoke. Ribeiro (3126) reported the presence of acrolein (propenal) in tobacco smoke. Wenusch (4202) reported 2-furaldehyde and acetone in cigarette smoke. Roffo (3324) reported 2-furaldehyde in cigarette smoke. Schmalfuss (3475) reported biacetyl (2,3-butanedione) in tobacco smoke. Smirnov et al. (3A19) listed 3-pentanone as a tobacco smoke component. In his catalog of the components of tobacco smoke reported to mid-1954, Kosak (2170) provided references to reports in tobacco smoke of the following aldehydes: Formaldehyde [Neuberg and Ottenstein (2706), Neuberg and Burkard (2702), McNally (2524)], acetaldehyde [Neuberg and Burkard (2702), Pfyl (2937)], butyraldehyde (butanal) [Neuberg and Burkard (2702)], acrolein (propenal) [McNally (2524)], benzaldehyde [Neuberg and Burkard (2702)], 2-furaldehyde [Wenusch (1939), Roffo (3324)].
1932 1933 1936 1937 1939 1939 1939 1939 1939 1940 1954
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 311
11/24/08 12:22:51 PM
312
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-14 (continued) Chronology of Studies on Aldehydes and Ketones in Tobacco Smoke Year
1955 1956 1959 1959
1961
1963
1963 1963 1963 1964
1964
1964
1965
1965 1965/1966
1966
1967
Event
Kosak also cataloged reports on the following ketones in tobacco smoke: 3-Pentanone (diethyl ketone) [Neuberg and Burkard (2702)], 4-heptanone (dipropyl ketone) [Neuberg and Burkard (2702)], 17-tritriacontanone (dipalmityl ketone) [Schürch and Winterstein (3562)], and 2,3-butanedione (biacetyl) [Schmalfuss (3475)]. In his study of the vapor phase of cigarette MSS, Laurene (2293) identified acrolein (propenal). Buyske et al. (564) reported butyraldehyde (butanal) and crotonaldehyde (2-butenal) in cigarette MSS. In their review of the components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed 18 aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke. In anticipation of their possible utility in the identification of aldehydes and ketones that might be present in the MSS from an all-tobacco and/or an all-cellulose cigarette, Fredrickson et al. (1238) prepared over 90 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives for use as standards and cataloged their infrared spectra. The spectral data were used several years later by Fredrickson et al. to identify numerous aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke (1239). Guillerm et al. (1451a) reported the ciliastatic activity of acetaldehyde and acrolein (propenal) in liquid and in vapor form in an in vitro system. They also reported the synergistic ciliastatic activity of these two aldehydes in cigarette MSS exposure studies. Horton et al. (3A11) reported that exposure of mice via inhalation to formaldehyde induced hyperplasia and metaplasia in the lung and typical hyperplastic changes in the trachea but the tracheal tissue changes did not progress to invasive carcinoma. Kensler and Battista (2083, 2084) reported significant ciliatoxicity for formaldehyde and acrolein and their levels in cigarette MSS were reduced by passage of the smoke through a charcoal-containing filter. In a study with human ciliated tonsillar epithelium, George (3A09) reported not only was phenol a strong ciliastat but also that acrolein (propenal) was an even stronger ciliastat. Murphy et al. (3A17) reported that exposure of guinea pigs to low concentrations of acrolein (propenal) resulted in an increase in total respiratory flow resistance plus decreased respiratory rates and increased tidal volume. Even though the Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999) reported that formaldehyde and acrolein (propenal) were two of the components of cigarette MSS considered to be inhibitors of ciliastatic transport activity, the Committee concluded: No one of these [ciliastatic components] occurs at levels high enough to produce the effect noted for smoke. Laurene et al. (2305) described an analytical method for the quantitative determination of acetaldehyde, acrolein (propenal), and acetone in cigarette MSS. Subsequently, an improvement in the analytical procedure for these three carbonyl components was reported by Laurene and Harbin (2302). From their study of the pyrogenesis of acrolein (propenal) from glycerol, Doihara et al. (1023) and others deduced that a tobacco smoking product that contains glycerol as a humectant has an enhanced potential for the formation and release of acrolein (propenal) during smoking [see Wynder and Hoffmann (4337)]. In testing the ciliatoxicity of cigarette MSS aldehydes to clam gill cilia, Wynder et al. (4330) reported that formaldehyde, acrolein (propenal), and crotonaldehyde (2-butenal) showed the highest toxicity. They also reported that acrolein was about twice as ciliatoxic as phenol in the clam gill cilia test [see also Wynder and Hoffmann (p. 253 in (4332)]. In addition to their aldehyde ciliatoxicity results, Wynder et al. (4330) also noted the serious error introduced into the results obtained in their study of the ciliatoxicity of low molecular weight acids in tobacco smoke. To quantitate the level of formaldehyde in cigarette MSS, Newsome et al. (2782) reported on a colorimetric method involving chromatropic acid. Walker and Kiefer (4109) examined the effect of cigarette MSS vapor phase on clam gill cilia. Removal of the acrolein region from the chromatographed vapor phase resulted in a significant reduction in the ciliastatic activity. Contrary toxicity results were reported for the same MSS in which the levels of acrolein (propenal) and acetaldehyde were reduced by 66% and 82%, respectively, by a “hydrazide” filter. The ciliastatic activity of the vapor phase of the “hydrazide” filtered MSS was, within experimental error, the same as that of the unfiltered smoke. Wynder and Hoffmann (4337) offer a possible explanation for these contradictory results: Acrolein administered alone is quite toxic but in the cigarette smoke vapor phase its effect is “masked” or “neutralized” by other smoke components (identity not specified). In their study of the levels of acrolein, acetaldehyde, acetone, hydrogen cyanide, nitrogen oxides, nicotine, and total solids in pipe tobacco MSS, Harbin and Laurene (1497) reported that the acrolein delivery increased as the glycerol level was increased by addition but the acrolein delivery leveled off when the glycerol addition exceeded 6%. Wynder and Hoffmann (4337) discussed the conversion of the glycerol, used as a humectant in tobacco smoking products, to acrolein (propenal) during the smoking process.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 312
11/24/08 12:22:51 PM
313
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-14 (continued) Chronology of Studies on Aldehydes and Ketones in Tobacco Smoke Year
Event
1968
In their study of the ciliastatic components of cigarette smoke MSS vapor phase, Dalhamn et al. (892, 893) reported that the absorption of the vapor-phase ciliastats by the fluids coating the oral cavity resulted in significant reductions of acetaldehyde (60%) and acetone (56%), i.e., significant levels of these in vitro ciliastats failed to reach the ciliated lung tissue and thus were unable to exert the ciliatoxicity asserted by some investigators. In his review of the components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, Stedman (3797) listed references to some 46 aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke. Martin and Thacker (2478) described the quantitation of several aldehydes (piperonal, ethylvanillin, vanillin) used as flavorants in cigarette tobacco. Despite the reported findings of Dalhamn et al. (892, 893), the Royal College of Physicians (3363) noted that acrolein (propenal) was one of the most important ciliastatic components of tobacco smoke, possibly contributing to the causes of pulmonary disease by interfering with the self-cleansing mechanism of the lung and thereby allowing more prolonged contact between the lining of the bronchial tubes and the carcinogenic agents in the smoke. From their study of 85-mm nonfiltered cigarettes made from each of four varieties of flue-cured tobacco, Rathkamp et al. (3087, 3088) reported that the MSS acetaldehyde deliveries ranged from 800 to 1,280 µg/cig; the acrolein (propenal) deliveries ranged from 51 to 102 µg/cig. The U.S. Surgeon General (4003) classified formaldehyde as a suspected contributor to the health hazard of smoking snf acrolein (propenal) as a probable health hazard in cigarette smoke. Testa and Joigny (3885) reported that the per cigarette delivery of acrolein (propenal) from a cigarette made from black tobacco was 65.7 µg. Tsuchiya et al. (3986a) reported that the levels of formaldehyde in fruits and vegetables ranged from 3.4 µg/g in spinach to 17.3 µg/g in apples. Kitchen et al. (2111b) noted that the most significant exposure to formaldehyde is generally industrial but formaldehyde occurs naturally in many foodstuffs, e.g., fruits and vegetables. Osha standards for exposure to air contaminants require an employee’s exposure to acrolein (propenal) not exceed an 8-hr time-weighted average of 0.25 mg/m3 (0.1 ppm) in the workplace air, in any 8-hr shift, during a 40-hr work week. Extensive experimental smoking in an unventilated room provided index levels for acrolein (propenal) that accumulated during the cigarette smoking. The industrially permitted threshold limit value (TLV) for acrolein (0.1 ppm; 0.25 mg/m3) was only exceeded under experimental conditions where as large number of cigarettes were burned in a closed room [Weber et al. (3A25)] . In his discussion of the vapor phase of cigarette MSS, Norman (2799a) listed per cigarette deliveries of 1200 µg and 70 µg for acetaldehyde and acrolein (propenal), respectively. Mansfield et al. (2456) described an analytical method to quantitate formaldehyde in cigarette MSS. In their study of the effect of inhaled acrolein (propenal) on the tumorigenicity of benzo[a]pyrene or N-nitrosodiethylamine, Feron and Kruysse (3A08) conducted inhalation and intratracheal experiments with two groups of 18 male and 18 female 6-wk old Syrian hamsters. One group was exposed to 9.2 mg/m3 (4 ppm) of acrolein in air (7 hr/day, 5 d/wk, 52 wk). The other group was similarly exposed to acrolein via inhalation but received an intratracheal installation of 0.9% saline. All animals alive at 81 wk were sacrificed. Only one female had a tracheal papilloma. Tumors at other sites were not increased vs untreated controls. In its assessment of tobacco smoke components reported to be ciliastatic, the Royal College of Physicians (3364) reported that acrolein (propenal) appeared to be the most important. According to the Chemical Industrial Institute of Toxicology (CIIT) (3A04), data supporting the tumorigenicity of formaldehyde were first reported on 8 October, 1979 [see Battelle Institute (3A01)]. U.S. Surgeon General (4005) reported acrolein (propenal) to be one of the major toxic agents in the vapor phase of unaged cigarette MSS. Swenberg et al. (3A21) reported the induction of squamous cell carcinomas in the nasal cavities of rats exposed to cigarette MSS plus 15 ppm of formaldehyde in chambers, 30 hr/wk for 18 months. The authors noted that reported per cigarette deliveries for formaldehyde ranged from 20 to 90 µg; for acrolein (propenal), deliveries ranged from 10 to 40 µg. Swenberg et al. listed acrolein as a ciliatoxic agent in cigarette MSS. In its report, the Battelle Institute (3A01) described the induction of tumors in rats and mice exposed via inhalation to formaldehyde.
1968 1970 1971
1971/1973
1972 1972 1975 1976 1976 1976
1977 1977 1977
1977 1979 1979 1980
1981
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 313
11/24/08 12:22:51 PM
314
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table III-14 (continued) Chronology of Studies on Aldehydes and Ketones in Tobacco Smoke Year
Event
1981
According to Niosh, workers who smoke cigarettes are exposed to additional levels of formaldehyde since cigarette MSS contains as much as 40 ppm of formaldehyde by volume. It was deduced that an individual who smokes a pack a day (20 cigarettes) would inhaled 0.38 mg of formaldehyde whereas occupational exposure at 3 ppm could result in a daily intake of 29.0 mg (3A04). Dalbey (3A06) reported that 88 male Syrian hamsters exposed to 70 ppm of formaldehyde vapor (5 hr/d, 5 d/wk) for their lifetime showed no detectable respiratory tract tumors. No respiratory tract tumors were observed in a similar inhalation experiment involving male hamsters exposed to 30 ppm of formaldehyde (5 hr/d, 1d/wk) for their lifetime. In its assessment of the literature on formaldehyde, the IARC (3A13) reported that it considered the evidence sufficient that formaldehyde was carcinogenic to rats. However, the IARC also stated that the epidemiological data [to that time] did not provide adequate evidence to assess the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in man. The U.S. Surgeon General (4010) reported that formaldehyde and acrolein (propenal) were “tumorigenic” and each was “a major toxic agent” in the vapor phase of cigarette MSS. In a discussion of low-delivered doses of alleged carcinogenic compounds, Starr (3789b) note: Even though formaldehyde has been demonstrated to be mutagenic/genotoxic in test systems of one kind or another, we do not know that is in the human case. Formaldehyde is a major chemical building block in our society. Its outright ban would cause dramatic changes in society [also see Starr in Clary et al. (3A05)]. At the Chemical Industrial Institute of Toxicology (CIIT) meeting, Fayerweather stated: When the epidemiological studies are viewed as a whole, the data suggest that formaldehyde has not been responsible for producing cancer in man [see Fayerweather in Clary et al. (3A05)]. Jenkins et al. (1932) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) analyzed the MSS from 32 commercial brands of cigarettes marketed in the U.S. for their deliveries of specific smoke components. Included was acrolein (propenal) whose deliveries ranged from 33 to 141 µg/cig. Kerns et al. (2086b) reported significant increases in squamous-cell carcinomas of the nasal cavity were observed in both strains of rats after inhaling highly cytotoxic doses of formaldehyde. However, no carcinomas were observed in mice after inhaling the same dose. In other studies to evaluate the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde, mice and hamsters were exposed via inhalation, rats via subcutaneous injection and rabbits via exposure in oral tanks. The results from these studies have been considered inadequate to evaluate the carcinogenic risk to humans (3A06, 3A13). From its study of formaldehyde, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (3A23) reported: The data are sparse and conflicting and do not yet provide persuasive evidence of a causal relation between exposure to formaldehyde and cancer in man. It concluded: Although some epidemiological studies noted that there may be an association between formaldehyde exposure and some forms of cancer, the data from these studies are not sufficient, at this time, for quantitative risk modeling. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (3A07) noted: There may be a reasonable basis to conclude that certain exposures to formaldehyde present a significant risk of widespread harm to human beings. This statement contradicts a previous one by the EPA in 1982 that no significant risks to human were expected from formaldehyde! From their assessment of components of indoor air found to be tumorigenic in laboratory animals, Sterling and Arundel (3A20) suggested that formaldehyde was potentially carcinogenic to humans. Theiss et al. (3A22) reported a statistically significant increase in the number of lung adenomas in mice after inhaling air containing 15 ppm of formaldehyde for 18 weeks. Acetaldehyde deliveries ranged from 18 to 2815 µg/cig for nonfiltered cigarettes [Huynh et al. (1853a), Miyake and Shibamoto (2564)]. A proposal to lower the exposure limit of formaldehyde from 5 to 1 ppm was under consideration by OSHA (3A18). Although formaldehyde was reported by Starr and Gibson (3789b) to be carcinogenic in rats when administered at very high dose levels, IARC found the weight of evidence of its carcinogenicity in humans to be inadequate. The IARC (1870) listed the delivery range for acrolein (propenal) in cigarette MSS vapor phase as 10 to 110 µg/cig and classified it as a ciliatoxic component. Formaldehyde was reported in two studies to induce aneuploidy [Liang and Brinkley (2363a), Oshimura and Barrett (2868a)].
1982
1982
1982 1982
1982
1983
1983
1984
1984
1984 1984 1984 1985 1985 1986 1985/1986
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 314
11/24/08 12:22:51 PM
315
Aldehydes and Ketones
Table III-14 (continued) Chronology of Studies on Aldehydes and Ketones in Tobacco Smoke Year
Event
1986
Brunnemann et al. (500) determined several volatile aldehydes and ketones in tobacco headspace and tobacco smoke by derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. Tobacco smoke carbonyl components identified included: Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde (1000 µg/cig), propionaldehyde (propanal), acrolein (propenal), isobutyraldehyde (2-methylpropanal), crotonaldehyde (2-butenal), methacrolein (2-methylpropenal), benzaldehyde (1 µg/cig), and acetone. Bell et al. (243) used the formation of the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative of formaldehyde in SSS as the means to quantitate the level of formaldehyde in SSS. In its review of formaldehyde, the IARC noted that formaldehyde is carcinogenic and mutagenic only at doses far in excess of that seen in cigarette MSS. Whether formaldehyde is mutagenic at non-cytotoxic dose levels remains controversial because of the small number of studies and the variability of the results (3A14). The IARC (3A15) also noted that results from some studies suggest that humans routinely exposed to formaldehyde display increased chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral lymphocytes. Nevertheless, rodents treated with formaldehyde in vivo gave negative results for chromosomal aberrations and assays for lethal mutations; other rodent studies on DNA damage gave equivocal results. Deluca (929) described a 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine procedure for the collection of carbonyl compounds in ETS. Formaldehyde deliveries in MSS vapor phase range from 3.4 µg for filtered cigarettes to 283 µg in unfiltered cigarettes [Schaller et al. (3427), Miyake and Shibamoto (2564)]. Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) included formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and crotonaldehyde (2-butenal) in their list of 43 tumorigenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Their text accompanying the list plus the authors’ disregard of how the tumorigenicity of many of the 43 components was determined experimentally raises serious questions as to why many of the components were listed. The EPA (1148) cited the Hoffmann-Hecht list of 43 tumorigenic components in tobacco and tobacco MSS in their effort to indict ETS as a significant health hazard. In their treatise on ETS, Guerin et al. [(3A10), see p. 197 in (1446)] at ORNL discussed in detail the levels of formaldehyde in indoor and outdoor air. They noted: It might be expected that environmental tobacco smoke would be an important contributor to indoor air concentrations of formaldehyde because formaldehyde is known to be a constituent of cigarette smoke. Popular commercial cigarettes deliver approximately 20-90 micrograms of formaldehyde in their mainstream smoke and 1-2 milligrams of formaldehyde in their SSS. While this contribution may at first appear highly significant, it has generally been found to be very minor when compared with other sources. OSHA ruled that the exposure limit for formaldehyde should be reduced from 3 ppm to 0.75 ppm. OSHA (2825) in its list of 43 tumorigenic components of tobacco smoke included only formaldehyde and acetaldehyde but not crotonaldehyde (2-butenal). NCI (2683a) reported on the OSHA 1992 ruling that the exposure limit for formaldehyde should be reduced from 3 ppm to 0.75 ppm. Although formaldehyde was reported by Monticello and Morgan (2610a) to be carcinogenic in rats when administered at very high dose levels, IARC found the weight of evidence of its carcinogenicity in humans to be inadequate. Formaldehyde deliveries in MSS vapor phase range from 3.4 µg for filtered cigarettes to 283 µg in unfiltered cigarettes [Schaller et al. (3427), Miyake and Shibamoto (2564)]. Acetaldehyde deliveries ranged from 18 to 2815 µg/cig for nonfiltered cigarettes [Huynh et al. (1853a), Miyake and Shibamoto (2564)]. Green and Rodgman (1373) reviewed presentations during the first half century (1947-1996) of the TCRC on the subject of the identification and quantitation of aldehydes and ketones in cigarette MSS and SSS as well as in ETS. Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741) in their lists of 60 tumorigenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke included only two aldehydes - formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Crotonaldehyde (2-butenal) include in the 1990 Hoffmann-Hecht list (1727) was omitted from the Hoffmann-Hoffmann (1740), an omission that paralleled the 1994 OSHA list (2825). According to information from the Environmental Health Center (EHC) (1145a), formaldehyde is usually present at the non-irritating level of about 0.06 ppm. Smith et al. discussed the IARC classification of the tobacco smoke vapor-phase components formaldehyde and acetaldehyde as IARC Group 2A [Smith et al. (3713)] and Group 2B [Smith et al. (3714)] carcinogens, respectively. In a discussion of the various lists of tumorigenic components in tobacco and tobacco smoke issued between 1986 and 2003, Rodgman and Green (3300) and Rodgman (3265) noted that formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, crotonaldehyde (2-butenal), and acrolein (propenal) were included in the majority of them (1217, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1808, 1870, 2825) IARC revaluated formaldehyde and classifies it as a Group 1 carcinogen (3A03, 3A16).
1987 1987
1988 1989 1990
1990 1992
1992 1994 1994 1994 1995
1996 1997/1998
1998 1999 2003
2006
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C003.indd 315
11/24/08 12:22:52 PM
4
Carboxylic Acids
IV.A The Carboxylic Acids Numerous organic acids have been identified in tobacco. These volatile, nonvolatile, and amino acids have been discussed in-depth by Tso [see Chapter 24 in (3973)]. The major nonvolatile acids are 2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic (citric), hydroxybutanedioic (malic), and ethanedioic (oxalic). The minor nonvolatile acids are hydroxyacetic (glycolic), butanedioic (succinic), propanedioic acid (malonic), butenedioic (E) (fumaric acid), and 2-oxopropanoic (pyruvic). The major volatile acids in tobacco are acetic and formic acid; minor volatile acids are propanoic, 2-furancarboxylic acid (2-furoic), benzoic, α-methylbutyric, β-methylvaleric, and numerous others. Over forty amino acids and related compounds have been identified in tobacco [Leffingwell (2337)]. The number of identified carboxylic acids in tobacco and tobacco smoke has escalated greatly since the publication in 1954 by Kosak (2170) of his list of identified components in tobacco smoke. The Kosak list included the following carboxylic acids in tobacco smoke: formic acid, acetic acid, butanoic acid, pentanoic acid (valeric acid), hexanoic acid (caproic acid), 7- and 8-carbon carboxylic acids, butanedioic acid (succinic acid), butenedioic acid (E) (fumaric acid), benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylic acid (citric acid), and phenolic acids. Kosak questioned the identification data of many of the acids listed. Johnstone and Plimmer (1971), in their 1959 catalog of tobacco and tobacco smoke components, listed fifty-two specific acids plus a range of saturated aliphatic acids. However, Johnstone and Plimmer listed tobacco and smoke amino acids in a different section of their report and included nicotinic acid and nicotinamide as amino acids [see Table 11 in (1971)]. Also, listed in a third section were such carboxylic acids as 3-[[3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5-trihydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid (chlorogenic acid), 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid (quinic acid), and 3,4,5-trihydroxy-1-cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid (shikimic acid) [see Table 9 in (1971)]. Similar separation problems are encountered on examination of the various assignments of carboxylic acids in the 1968 review by Stedman [see Tables IX, X, and XIV in (3797)]. In our report, any compound with a carboxyl group is cataloged in this chapter. Table IV.A-1 summarizes the numbers of carboxylic acids and amino acids identified to date in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Their listing and references are presented in subsequent tables. Despite the number of acids identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke, very few of the tobacco smoke acids have been indicted as toxicants. In 1964, Boyland et al. (4A01) described the induction of a bladder carcinoma in one of sixteen mice
(6.5%) implanted with a cholesterol pellet containing 3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoic acid (caffeic acid). However, the carcinogenicity could not be attributed to the acid when it was observed that five of the seventy-seven mice (6.5%) implanted with the cholesterol pellet alone developed bladder carcinomas. Although caffeic acid was not included in any of the pre-2001 listings by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1871), Hoffmann and Wynder (1808), Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), Hoffmann et al. (1773), Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741, 1742), it was listed in the two 2001 publications by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743) and Hoffmann et al. (1744), primarily because of its phenolic nature. In the latter two articles, formic, acetic, and propanoic acids are listed as major mainstream smoke (MSS) vaporphase components [Table 5-1 in (1743), Table 2 in (1744)] and hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid), octadecanoic acid (stearic acid), 9-octadecenoic acid (oleic acid), 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (linoleic acid), 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid (linolenic acid), and 2-hydroxypropanoic acid (lactic acid) are listed as major MSS particulate-phase components [Table 5-2 in (1743), Table 3 in (1744)].* By inclusion of per cigarette yields from the mid-1950s to the date of the publication, these long-chained saturated and unsaturated acids and lactic acid are listed as major particulate-phase components. No comment is made as to whether that statement about the per cigarette yields of the six acids is valid for cigarettes manufactured post-1995. The formic, acetic, and propanoic acids listed as major MSS vapor-phase components were defined as ciliastats by Wynder et al. (4304, 4350) in the mid-1960s [see summary graph, p. 254, Table VII-31 in (4332)]. However, Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) were among the first to comment on the fact that all vapor-phase ciliastats are water soluble and therefore may be removed from the smoke stream by solution in the fluids coating the oral cavity. In their 1967 book [see p. 646 in (4332)], they stated: In man’s manner of smoking, however, volatile components are retained to a significant degree in the oral cavity and may, therefore, be far less important than when tested experimentally.
The validity of their 1967 statement had been demonstrated by the results of studies in 1964 by Rodgman et al. (3306, 4A02) and subsequently in 1968 by Dalhamn et al. (892) on the removal of substantial amounts of water-soluble vaporphase ciliastats from inhaled MSS by the oral cavity fluids. *
From a comparison of the listings in (1743) and (1744), it should be noted that in the particulate-phase acids listed in (1744) stearic acid has been inadvertently omitted and its per cigarette MSS yield assigned to palmitic acid.
317
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 317
11/13/08 5:11:41 PM
318
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-1 Acids Identified in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke to Date Acid Category
Total
Smoke
Tobacco
Tobacco and Smoke
Carboxylic acids
52 745
37 354
43 614
29 223
Table 8 in (1971) Table IV.A-3
Amino acids
28 103
4 30
26 102
2 29
Table 11 in (1971) Table IV.B-7
It is interesting to note that all but two (formic acid, octadecanoic acid [stearic acid]) of the MSS vapor-phase and particulate-phase acids discussed above—whether identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, or both—are listed by Doull et al. (1053) as compounds included in the flavor formulations added to a tobacco blend by U.S. cigarette manufacturers to enhance consumer acceptability of the product. Table IV.A-2 lists the tobacco and/or smoke carboxylic acids that, according to the Doull et al. listing (1053), are or have been used recently as components in flavor formulations for tobacco. It should also be noticed that the flavor ingredient additions in Table IV.A-2 include fifteen amino acids. Table IV.A-3 is a catalog of the carboxylic acids identified to date in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. Of the 745 components listed, 354 have been identified in smoke, 614 in tobacco, and 223 in both. Because of the recent interest in several amino acid degradation products generated during the tobacco smoking process, a separate section (IV.B) is devoted to the amino acids and a discussion of their behavior during pyrolysis and the smoking process.
IV.B The Amino Acids and Related Compounds Amino acids, both as free acids and as acids bound within protein molecules, are present in all of the tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Oriental, Maryland) used in the American tobacco blend. The diversity and levels of amino acids in various tobaccos have been presented by Gori [see Table 2 in (1329), Table 2 in (1330)] and Tso and Chaplin [see Table 8 in (3975)]. Leffingwell (2337), in his report on nitrogen components of leaf and their relationship to smoking quality, reported in 1976 that there were forty-three amino acids isolated from tobacco. Examples of amino acids occurring free and/or bound in tobaccos include α- and β-alanine, α-and γ-aminobutyric acid, arginine, aspartic acid, cysteic acid, cysteine, cystine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, norleucine, ornithine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and valine (3983b). The presence in cigarette MSS of numerous free amino acids and amino acid-derived compounds was demonstrated in the mid-1950s. This occurred soon after the publication of the results of several cigarette smoke-related epidemiological
Reference
and biological studies led to a massive escalation in tobacco smoke composition studies; for example, Buyske et al. (562) reported the identification of glutamic acid and its derivative glutamine (glutamic acid 5-amide) in tobacco smoke. Other amino acids identified in tobacco smoke include alanine, aspartic acid (and asparagine), cysteine, glycine, leucine, ornithine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, and valine [Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884)]. In the early 1960s, pyrocoll (dipyrrolo[a,d]pyrazine-5,10dione) was identified in cigarette MSS by Mold et al. (2592), who proposed that the amino acid proline, either free or bound, was its precursor. During their study of the isolation and identification of N-heterocyclic components (the indoles and carbazoles) in cigarette MSS, Rodgman and Cook (3279) confirmed the presence of pyrocoll. Two decades earlier, Van Order and Linwall (4B01) had demonstrated that dry distillation of the amino acid tryptophan yielded indole and 3-methylindole (skatole), both of which were subsequently identified as tobacco smoke components by Rodgman and Cook (3279). Roberts [see citation in Rodgman and Cook (3279)] had also identified indole as a component of burley tobacco. By means of pyrolysis studies (850°C, nitrogen atmosphere) with the amino acids lysine, leucine, and tryptophan, Patterson et al. (2902) demonstrated that each of the three amino acids yielded the N-heterocyclic compounds indole, quinoline, isoquinoline, several nitriles, and a series of PAHs ranging in complexity from bicyclic to tetracyclic (their findings are summarized in Table IV.B-1). In their study, B[a] P was found only in the pyrolysate from leucine. From their own findings and from a previous report by Jarboe and Rosene (1923a) that quinoline and isoquinoline were components of a nicotine pyrolysate, Patterson et al. (2902) suggested that the precursors in tobacco of the aza-arenes quinoline and isoquinoline in tobacco smoke might be nicotine and/or the amino acids. They also reported that tryptophan, on a per mole pyrolyzed basis, yielded a phenol fraction whose weight was more than five times that generated from lysine and about thirty times that from leucine. In another series of experiments, Patterson et al. (2903) reported (1) the effect of the pyrolysis temperature on the composition of the pyrolysate from the amino acid phenylalanine with emphasis on the levels of PAHs generated and (2) the effect of other compounds (tryptophan or pyrrole) on the composition of the pyrolysate when mixtures of equimolar quantities of tryptophan and phenylalanine or pyrrole and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 318
11/13/08 5:11:42 PM
319
Carboxylic Acids
Table IV.A-2 Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Carboxylic Acids Used in Flavor Formulations Identified In CAS No.
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
64-19-7 107-95-9 74-79-3 5794-13-8 56-84-8 103-82-2 65-85-0 147-71-7 6915-15-7 107-92-6 116-53-0 503-74-2 13201-46-2 52-90-4 334-48-5 143-07-7 6899-05-4 6899-04-3 111-14-8 57-10-3 110-44-1 142-62-1 4536-23-6 1289-40-3 71-00-1 73-32-5 56-87-1 112-05-0 506-21-8 463-40-1 112-80-1 124-07-2 109-52-4 97-61-0 105-43-1 646-07-1 123-76-2 591-80-0 63-91-2 147-85-3 77-92-9 79-09-4 50-21-5 79-31-2 127-17-3 501-52-0 499-12-7 621-82-9 544-63-8 72-19-5 60-18-4 7004-03-7
Acetic acid β-Alanine L-Arginine L-Asparagine monohydrate L-Aspartic acid Benzeneacetic acid Benzoic acid Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxyButanedioic acid, hydroxylButanoic acid Butanoic acid, 2-methylButanoic acid, 3-methyl2-Butenoic acid, 2-methylL-Cysteine Decanoic acid Dodecanoic acid L-Glutamic acid L-Glutamine Heptanoic acid Hexadecanoic acid 2,4-Hexadienoic acida Hexanoic acid Hexanoic acid, 2-methyl2-Hexenoic acid L-Histidine DL-Isoleucine L-Lysine Nonanoic acid 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid 9-Octadecenoic acid Octanoic acid Pentanoic acid Pentanoic acid, 2-methylPentanoic acid, 3-methylPentanoic acid, 4-methylPentanoic acid, 4-oxo4-Pentenoic acid L-Phenylalanine L-Proline 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxyPropanoic acid Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxyPropanoic acid, 2-methylPropanoic acid, 2-oxoPropanoic acid, 3-phenyl1-Propene-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenylTetradecanoic acid L-Threonine L-Tyrosine Valine
acetic acid β-alanine L-arginine asparagine l-aspartic acid phenylacetic acid benzoic acid tartaric acid malic acid butyric acid 2-methylbutyric acid isovaleric acid methyl-2-butenoic acid L-cysteine capric acid lauric acid L-glutamic acid L-glutamine enanthic acid palmitic acid sorbic acid a caproic acid 2-methylhexanoic acid 2-hexenoic acid L-histidine DL-isoleucine L-lysine nonanoic acid linoleic acid linolenic acid oleic acid caprylic acid valeric acid 2-methylvaleric acid 3-methylpentanoic acid 4-methylpentanoic acid levulinic acid 4-pentenoic acid L-phenylalanine L-proline citric acid propionic acid lactic acid isobutyric acid pyruvic acid 3-phenylpropionic acid aconitic acid cinnamic acid myristic acid L-threonine L-tyrosine valine
a
Smoke
Tobacco
+ + — + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — — — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + — + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
2 ,4-Hexadienoic acid (sorbic acid) is not included in the Doull et al. list (1053) but is included in flavor formulations used by cigarette manufacturers outside of the U.S. [see Table 7A in (3266)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 319
11/13/08 5:11:43 PM
320
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 320
11/13/08 5:11:44 PM
Carboxylic Acids
321
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 321
11/13/08 5:11:50 PM
322
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 322
11/13/08 5:11:52 PM
Carboxylic Acids
323
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 323
11/13/08 5:12:00 PM
324
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 324
11/13/08 5:12:02 PM
Carboxylic Acids
325
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 325
11/13/08 5:12:04 PM
326
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 326
11/13/08 5:12:07 PM
Carboxylic Acids
327
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 327
11/13/08 5:12:09 PM
328
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 328
11/13/08 5:12:19 PM
Carboxylic Acids
329
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 329
11/13/08 5:12:20 PM
330
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 330
11/13/08 5:12:22 PM
Carboxylic Acids
331
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 331
11/13/08 5:12:25 PM
332
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 332
11/13/08 5:12:27 PM
Carboxylic Acids
333
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 333
11/13/08 5:12:29 PM
334
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 334
11/13/08 5:12:31 PM
Carboxylic Acids
335
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 335
11/13/08 5:12:34 PM
336
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 336
11/13/08 5:12:43 PM
Carboxylic Acids
337
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 337
11/13/08 5:12:44 PM
338
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 338
11/13/08 5:12:47 PM
Carboxylic Acids
339
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 339
11/13/08 5:12:48 PM
340
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 340
11/13/08 5:12:56 PM
Carboxylic Acids
341
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 341
11/13/08 5:12:57 PM
342
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 342
11/13/08 5:12:59 PM
Carboxylic Acids
343
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 343
11/13/08 5:13:02 PM
344
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 344
11/13/08 5:13:04 PM
Carboxylic Acids
345
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 345
11/13/08 5:13:06 PM
346
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 346
11/13/08 5:13:08 PM
Carboxylic Acids
347
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 347
11/13/08 5:13:11 PM
348
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 348
11/13/08 5:13:13 PM
Carboxylic Acids
349
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 349
11/13/08 5:13:16 PM
350
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 350
11/13/08 5:13:18 PM
Carboxylic Acids
351
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 351
11/13/08 5:13:20 PM
352
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 352
11/13/08 5:13:22 PM
Carboxylic Acids
353
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 353
11/13/08 5:13:25 PM
354
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 354
11/13/08 5:13:27 PM
Carboxylic Acids
355
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 355
11/13/08 5:13:30 PM
356
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 356
11/13/08 5:13:36 PM
Carboxylic Acids
357
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 357
11/13/08 5:13:38 PM
358
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 358
11/13/08 5:13:40 PM
Carboxylic Acids
359
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 359
11/13/08 5:13:43 PM
360
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 360
11/13/08 5:13:46 PM
Carboxylic Acids
361
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 361
11/13/08 5:13:49 PM
362
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 362
11/13/08 5:13:51 PM
Carboxylic Acids
363
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 363
11/13/08 5:13:53 PM
364
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 364
11/13/08 5:13:56 PM
365
Carboxylic Acids
Table IV.A-3 (Continued) Carboxylic Acids in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
phenylalanine were pyrolyzed. The results from this study are summarized in Table IV.B-2. The difference between the pyrogenesis of PAHs from phenylalanine and the mixture of equimolar quantities of phenylalanine and the amino acid tryptophan prompted Patterson et al. (2903) to propose the addition of amino acids to tobacco as a possible means to control the PAH content of the CSC: These results suggest the possibility that aromatic hydrocarbon content of tobacco “tar” may be affected by the amino acid composition of the tobacco and that it might be possible to affect deliberately the amount of aromatics and bases formed by adding suitable additives, such as amino acids, to the tobacco.
Of course, in 1971 when Patterson et al. offered this suggestion, the presence in amino acid pyrolysates of the socalled “cooked food” mutagens and the inordinately high mutagenicity of several of them were unknown. Higman et al. (1647) also reported the generation of PAHs, phenols, pyridines, indole, quinoline, and other aromatic bases during the pyrolysis of amino acids and proteins from tobacco [see the review on pyrogenesis of smoke components by Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722)]. The pyrolysis results reported by Higman et al. are summarized in Table IV.B-3.
Tryptophan was also found to be the precursor in tobacco of two other N-heterocyclic compounds, namely harman (1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole) and norharman (9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole), in tobacco smoke. These compounds were originally identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke by Philip Morris R&D personnel in 1961 and 1962 [Poindexter and Carpenter (2972)] and in 1963 [Poindexter et al. (2972)]. That tryptophan was indeed a precursor in tobacco of the two harmans in smoke was demonstrated by addition of radiolabeled tryptophan to cigarette tobacco and identification of radiolabeled harman and norharman in the MSS. In the mid-1970s, pyrolysis studies with several amino acids led to the isolation and identification of several additional polycyclic N-heterocyclic compounds which are reported not only to be tumorigenic to mouse skin but also to show inordinately high mutagenicity when tested in the Ames bioassay with Salmonella typhimurium. The impetus for these particular amino acid pyrolysis studies was not the attempt to define the relationship between tobacco leaf precursors and tobacco smoke components but the observation that the extracts of broiled, fried, or roasted foodstuffs (meat, fish, poultry, etc.) were highly mutagenic in the Ames bioassay (Salmonella typhimurium). These N-heterocyclic
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 365
11/13/08 5:13:58 PM
366
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-1 Components in Pyrolysates from the Amino Acids Lysine, Leucine, and Tryptophan (2902) Yield, mg/mole of Amino Acid Pyrolyzed Pyrolysate Component
Lysine
a
Leucine
Tryptophan
Nitrogen Compounds Hydrogen cyanide Aniline Quinoline Isoquinoline Benzonitrile o-Tolunitrile m-Tolunitrile p-Tolunitrile Phenylacetonitrile Indole 1-Naphthonitrile 2-Naphthonitrile
+b 60 160 80 470 30 30 20 6 20 10 —
+ 5 8 6 40 + 30 + — + 30 —
+ — 17.7 2.4 1370 610 + + 400 610 350 170
5 10 2 40 210 10 10 20 30 10 30 10 10 2 10 10 + + —
20 30 — 70 620 40 50 — 19 80 250 90 110 20 30 50 + + 30
— + + — 1100 + — — 3 140 7900 210 270 — 150 110 + + —
Cyclic Hydrocarbons Styrene Biphenyl Bibenzyl Indene Naphthalene Naphthalene, 1-methylNaphthalene, 2-methylAcenaphthene Acenaphthylene Fluorene Anthracene/phenanthrene Fluoranthene Pyrene Pyrene, methylBenzofluorene Chrysene Triphenylene Benz[a]anthracene Benzopyrene a b
Pyrolyzed as lysine monohydrochloride + indicates the presence of compound; — indicates the absence of the compound.
compounds, all amines, derived from the amino acids and/ or proteins in heated foodstuffs, were often described as “cooked food” mutagens. Eventually they were defined as N-heterocyclic amines. In a later chapter, the N-heterocyclic amines will be discussed in greater detail. The studies in the 1970s on the tumorigenicity and mutagenicity of extracts of cooked foodstuffs were reminiscent of the studies in the 1920s by Kennaway (2074–2076, 2080), who reported the tumorigenicity of extracts of heated foodstuffs or pyrolysates from heated organic compounds such as cholesterol, and by Roffo (4A03–4A05), who reported the tumorigenicity of pyrolyzed cholesterol. Subsequently it was
shown that many of the foodstuff pyrolysates and the cholesterol pyrolysates contained a spectrum of PAHs, including B[a]P. Identification of the highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic compounds in amino acid pyrolysates was followed by identification of some of them not only in broiled or roasted meats but also in mainstream CSC. In 1977, Sugimura et al. (3829) reported the identification of the potent mutagens 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (coded Trp-P-2) and 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5Hpyrido[4,3-b]indole (coded Trp-P-1) in pyrolysates from tryptophan. The next year, Yamamota et al. (4365a) identified two additional highly mutagenic compounds in pyrolysates
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 366
11/13/08 5:13:59 PM
367
Carboxylic Acids
Table IV.B-2 Pyrolysis of Phenylalanine. A. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature. B. Effect of Equimolar Addition of Tryptophan or Pyrrole (2903) Material Pyrolyzed Phe + Tryb
Phe + Pyrc
450°C
650°C
850°C
950°C
850°C
850°C
850°C
— 10300
1270 12000
10300 2550
4360 +
10300 2550
2980 —
2240 345
— 0.12 — — — — 0.42 4.12 — — – — —
0.36 1.45 + — 0.48 1.70 1.33 9.70 0.48 0.48 3.50 — 0.48
2.73 3.50 — — 1.94 2.55 4.50 20.00 1.94 1.27 3.20 3.20 2.55
— 1.27 — — <0.18 0.73 0.85 7.90 2.60 0.60 1.20 <0.60 1.58
2.73 3.50 — — 1.94 2.55 4.50 20.00 1.94 1.27 3.20 3.20 2.55
— 3.52 — 2.98 0.054 0.40 0.78 1.44 0.22 0.16 0.30 0.22 0.16
0.17 5.60 0.73 0.34 0.086 0.99 0.65 2.41 0.39 0.04 0.39 + 0.30
1.27 — — — – — — — —
0.85 0.36 0.06 0.18 1.40 1.40 2.30 1.80 3.00
7.88 2.85 — 0.18 — — 0.72 12.00 10.90
1.27 0.06 0.06 — — — — 0.30 0.18
7.88 2.85 — 0.18 — — 0.72 12.00 10.90
3.80 0.68 1.38 0.38 0.22 1.14 17.35 25.75 1.10
1.46 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.13 1.00 0.86 1.30 0.43
Phenylalanine (Phe) Pyrolyzed at Pyrolysate Component a
Phe
Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Biphenyl Bibenzyl Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Indene Naphthalene Naphthalene, 1-methylNaphthalene, 2-methylAcenaphthene Acenaphthylene Fluorene Phenanthrene/anthracene Benzofluorene Fluoranthene Pyrene Pyrene, methylChrysenes N-Containing Compounds Benzonitrile o-Tolunitrile m-Tolunitrile p-Tolunitrile Phenylacetonitrile 1-Naphthonitrile Indole Quinoline Isoquinoline
Yield of pyrolysis component in mg/g of compound or mixture pyrolyzed. Pyrolysis involved equimolar quantities of phenylalanine and tryptophan (total mol. wt. = 369). c Pyrolysis involved equimolar quantities of phenylalanine and pyrrole (total mol. wt. = 232). a
b
from glutamic acid: 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:’,2’-d]imidazole (coded Glu-P-2) and 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole (coded Glu-P-1). Table IV.B-4 lists several polynuclear N-heterocyclic amines that exhibit extremely high mutagenicity levels in the Ames bioassay, are amino acid pyrolysis products, and have been identified in various broiled, fried, or roasted foodstuffs as well as in CSC [Sugimura (3828c)]. On a per microgram basis, B[a]P in the Ames bioassay with Salmonella typhimurium (Strain TA 98) shows about 200 revertants/µg. Several of the amino acid-derived compounds in Table IV.B-4 exceed the B[a]P effect with the TA 98 strain by factors ranging from about 10 to over 2100. Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) reported the identification of two α-carbolines in CSC: 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole
(coded AαC) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (coded MeAαC). These and several other such compounds were reported in CSC by Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368). The quantitative levels of the possibly amino acid-derived, mutagenic N-heterocyclics in CSC are shown in Table IV.B-4. In their studies they emphasized in particular the identification and quantitation of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (coded IQ) because of its inordinately high mutagenicity (found to be 433000 and 490000 revertant/µg in several determinations) in the Ames bioassay with Salmonella typhimurium strain TA 98. Demonstration of the mutagenicity of the compounds listed in Table IV.B-4 was followed by demonstration of their tumorigenicity in various laboratory animals. Ohgaki et al. (2849b) demonstrated the tumorigenicity of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 367
11/13/08 5:14:00 PM
368
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-3 Components in Pyrolysates from Amino Acids (Proline and Glycine) and Proteins (Casein and Collagen) (1647) Amino Acid or Protein Pyrolysate Component
a, b
Casein
Collagen
Proline
Glycine
Nitrogen Compounds Hydrogen cyanide Pyridine Pyridine, 2-methylPyridine, 3-methylPyridine, 4-methylPyridine, 3-vinylAniline Pyrrole Quinoline Isoquinoline Indole Benzonitrile o-Tolunitrile m-Tolunitrile
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + — + + + + + — + +
+ + + + + — — + — — — + — —
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + — — — — —
— + + + + — —
+ + + + + +
+ — + + + +
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
Cyclic Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Styrene Xylenes Indene Naphthalene Fluorene Phenols Phenol o-Cresol m-Cresol p-Cresol Phenol, ethylXylenol
indicates the presence of compound; — indicates the absence of the + compound. b In the publication by Higman et al., actual pyrolysis yield data are listed for each compound. a
quinoline (IQ) in mice. Takayama et al. (3862c) and Tanaka et al. (3865c) reported its tumorigenicity in rats. 3-Amino-1, 4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) were reported to be tumorigenic in mice by Matsukura et al. (2491a) and in rats by Hosaka et al. (1835a) and Takayama et al. (3862d). Ohgaki et al. (2849b) reported that 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3′,2′-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-aminodipyrido
[1,2-a:3′,2′-d]-imidazole (Glu-P-2), 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole (AαC), and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAαC) were tumorigenic in mice, and Takayama et al. (3862d) reported Glu-P-1 and Glu-P-2 to be tumorigenic in rats. In a 1989 manuscript that was subsequently published, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) discussed amino acid-derived aromatic amines in cigarette MSS as follows: Of the known carcinogenic pyrolysis products of the amino acids, so far only 2-amino-3-methylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoline has been detected in trace amounts of 0.26 ng in the smoke of a Japanese filter cigarette [Yamashita et al. (4368)].
Apparently, Hoffmann and Hecht had overlooked not only the reports of the identification in CSC of several other known “carcinogenic” pyrolysis products of amino acids, for example, 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) (4388) or 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) (4367) but also the reports on the tumorigenicity of several other N-heterocyclic amines in different laboratory animals (1835a, 2491a, 2849, 2849a, 2849b, 3862b, 3862c, 3865c). Table IV.B-5 summarizes the reported MSS levels of the N-heterocyclic amines considered to be significant tumorigens by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741) plus the assessment of the IARC (1870) on their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals and humans. During tobacco growth, curing, aging, and/or the smoking process, the amino acids in tobacco may react with ammonia and/or amino acids to yield Amadori compounds which, when heated during the smoking process, will generate a variety of pyrazines [Green et al. (1376)]. Many of the pyrazines found in tobacco smoke are highly flavorful and contribute uniquely to the aroma and taste not only of tobacco smoke but also of a variety of consumer food products [Maga and Sizer, (2439)], such as coffee, tea, cocoa, roasted peanuts, and roasted, broiled, or fried meats, poultry, and fish. Table IV.B-6 lists the tobacco and/or smoke amino acids that, according to the Doull et al. listing (1053), are or have been used recently as components in flavor formulations for tobacco. In their tabulation of possible flavorants for tobacco smoking products, Leffingwell et al. (2341) listed the contributions to tobacco smoke taste and aroma of twenty-three amino acids added individually to cigarette tobacco filler. Table IV.B-7 lists the amino acids and related compounds identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. In Table IV.B-7, a total of 103 such components are listed, of which 30 have been identified in smoke, 102 in tobacco, and 29 in both smoke and tobacco.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 368
11/13/08 5:14:01 PM
369
Carboxylic Acids
Table IV.B-4 Amino Acid-Derived N-Heterocyclic Amines Compound Code IQ Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2 Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 AaC MeAaC a b
Mutagenicitya, rev/µg
Level in CSC,
Name
TA 98
TA 100
ng/cigb
Imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, 2-amino-3methyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole, 2-amino-6-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole, 2-amino9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino-3-methyl-
433000 490000 39000 104200 49000 1900 300 200
7000
0.26
1700 1800 3200 1200 20 120
0.29–0.48 0.82–1.1 0.37–0.89 0.25–0.88 25–260 2–37
Salmonella typhimurium, strain TA 98 or TA 100, with S-9 mix. See Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741).
Table IV.B-5 Summary of Lists of Tumorigenic N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco Smoke IARC (1870) Evaluation of Evidence re Tumorigenicity In Component
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
OSHA (2825)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741)
MSS Level wt/cig
Laboratory Animals
Humans
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
+ + + + + + + + +
0.37–0.89 ng 0.25–0.88 ng 0.29–0.48 ng 0.82–1.1 ng 25–260 ng 2–37 ng 0.26 ng 11–23 ng 0.26 ng
sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient
— — — — — — probable possible probable
Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2 AaC MeAaC IQ PhIP IQ
Table IV.B-6 Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Amino Acids Used in Flavor Formulations Identified In CAS No. 107-95-9 74-79-3 5794-13-8 56-84-8 52-90-4 6899-05-4 6899-04-3 71-00-1 73-32-5 56-87-1 63-91-2 147-85-3 72-19-5 60-18-4 7004-03-7
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature β-Alanine L-Arginine L-Asparagine monohydrate L-Aspartic acid L-Cysteine L-Glutamic acid L-Glutamine L-Histidine DL-Isoleucine L-Lysine L-Phenylalanine L-Proline L-Threonine L-Tyrosine Valine
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
Smoke
Tobacco
β-alanine L-arginine asparagine l-aspartic acid L-cysteine L-glutamic acid L-glutamine L-histidine DL-isoleucine L-lysine L-phenylalanine L-proline L-threonine L-tyrosine valine
+ — + + + + + — — — + + + — +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 369
11/13/08 5:14:02 PM
370
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-7 Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 370
11/13/08 5:14:09 PM
Carboxylic Acids
371
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 371
11/13/08 5:14:11 PM
372
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 372
11/13/08 5:14:13 PM
Carboxylic Acids
373
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 373
11/13/08 5:14:16 PM
374
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 374
11/13/08 5:14:18 PM
Carboxylic Acids
375
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 375
11/13/08 5:14:22 PM
376
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 376
11/13/08 5:14:25 PM
Carboxylic Acids
377
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 377
11/13/08 5:14:27 PM
378
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 378
11/13/08 5:14:30 PM
Carboxylic Acids
379
Table IV.B-7 (Continued) Amino Acids and Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C004.indd 379
11/13/08 5:14:32 PM
5
The Esters
While no esters were reported in tobacco smoke by Kosak (2170) in his 1954 compilation of reported tobacco smoke components, the number of esters in tobacco and its smoke has increased dramatically over the years and now exceeds 1000. In 1955, Latimer (2270) collated and reported component data from Chemical Abstracts and listed only one set of esters reported in tobacco and its smoke, the “glycerides.” In 1959, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed sixteen identified esters from these two sources. Between the Johnstone and Plimmer review and that of Stedman (3797) in 1968, the number of identified esters in tobacco and/or smoke escalated to over 300. The research leading to the major part of the increase involved identification of the following classes of esters: (1) esters from long-chained aliphatic alcohols and saturated and unsaturated acids, (2) esters from solanesol and acetic acid and numerous saturated and unsaturated acids, (3) esters from several phytosterols and numerous saturated and unsaturated acids, and (4) β-amyrin and numerous saturated and unsaturated acids. One other significant finding that stimulated much subsequent research on sugar esters was the isolation, identification, and synthesis of a specific ester in Oriental tobacco by Schumacher (3535) in 1960 and its identification a year later in Oriental tobacco smoke by Rodgman and Cook (3278). The ester was 6-acetyl-2,3,4-tris-d-3-methylvaleryl-β-Dglucopyranoside, that is, glucose esterified with the two aliphatic acids, acetic and 4-methylpentanoic (β-methylvaleric). The Schumacher research leading to the identification of this ester was described in detail by Green and Rodgman (1373) during the Symposium of the 50th Tobacco Research Chemists’ Conference. In his 1968 review of tobacco and smoke components, Stedman [see p. 165 and Table VI in (3797)] discussed at some length the procedures used to identify 272 esters of long-chained aliphatic alcohols in tobacco smoke. However, Stedman not only failed to cite the source of his discussion, an article by Rodgman et al. (3294), but also omitted from his text and ester tabulation that an identical series of esters was identified by Rodgman et al. in an aliphatic ester fraction obtained from Rowland and Latimer, who had isolated the fraction from flue-cured tobacco (3358) during their 1958 study of the solanesyl esters in tobacco. The identification of the numerous esters in the aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco and smoke led to the identification of a series of solanesyl and phytosteryl esters of saturated and unsaturated aliphatic acids in tobacco and smoke (3296) and a similar series of β-amyrin esters in tobacco by Fredrickson (1230). As mentioned previously, the characterization of the glucose ester in tobacco by Schumacher (3535) and the discovery that it generated the flavorful acid, 4-methylpentanoic
(β-methylvaleric) during the smoking process, led many years later to a series of studies aimed at determining the structure of the sucrose esters in tobacco. Despite the numerous studies, seldom was the precise structure of a sucrose ester defined. The various studies included those of Rivers (3185) in the early 1980s and of Severson et al. (3606), Schlotzhauer et al. (3473), Wahlberg et al. (4102), and Danehower (896) in the mid- to late 1980s. Several studies on tobacco and tobacco smoke composition, including studies of the long-chained aliphatic ester fraction, ultimately led to an interesting extrapolation by Green and Rodgman [see endnote 39 in (1373)] on the number of smoke components. Because of the limitations of analytical technology at the time of the Rodgman et al. study (3294) on the long-chained aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco and smoke, the higher molecular weight esters could neither be determined nor characterized. However, it was noted that qualitatively the tobacco ester fraction and the smoke ester fraction were similar. Every ester identified by Rodgman et al. in the smoke ester fraction was found in the tobacco ester fraction. Minor quantitative differences between the levels of individual esters in the two fractions were observed. With much improved analytical technology in the late 1980s, Arrendale et al. (103), in their study on the long-chained aliphatic ester fraction in tobacco, were able to identify not only many of the esters identified earlier in tobacco and smoke by Rodgman et al. but also many more higher molecular weight esters. Logic would dictate that if every ester identified in the Rodgman et al. study was present in both tobacco and smoke then every ester identified by Arrendale et al. (103) in tobacco would also be in smoke. Inclusion of the esters newly identified by Arrendale et al. in the smoke list results in a substantial increase in the number of smoke components. Examination of the esters listed in Table V-3 indicates that most of the esters identified in tobacco smoke are found in the particulate phase. An ester that exists predominantly in the vapor phase of tobacco smoke and was identified in cigarette MSS vapor phase by Laurene (2310) in 1959 and Grob (1413) in 1962 was the methyl ester of acetic acid. Since then, acetic acid methyl ester has been identified in cigarette MSS vapor phase in over fifty different studies. Because many esters have an aroma or taste acceptable to the consumer, the list of individual compounds used as tobacco ingredients by U.S. tobacco manufacturers contains numerous esters. Such a list was prepared by Doull et al. (1053) from information provided by the U.S. tobacco product manufacturers. A detailed examination of the Doull et al. list by Rodgman (3266) revealed that many of the added ingredients had been identified in additive-free tobacco and/or its smoke. 381
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 381
11/13/08 5:15:21 PM
382
As Rodgman noted, the compounds added as ingredients to cigarette tobacco may fall into one of the following categories: • It is a component of one or more of the tobacco types (flue-cured, Oriental, burley, Maryland) commonly used in cigarette blends. • It is a component of cigarette MSS. • It is a component of both tobacco and tobacco smoke. • It is not a component of either the tobaccos or their smoke. An ingredient compositionally similar to but not identical with a tobacco leaf or smoke component may be categorized in two ways: It is either an isomer or a homolog of a compound identified in natural tobacco leaf and/or its smoke. As noted, there are compounds used as cigarette ingredients that do not fall into any of the first three categories listed. In the broad spectrum of chemistry, biochemistry, and biology, cases exist where the properties of one homolog vary significantly from those of another or where the properties of one isomer differ significantly from those of another. For example, whether classified as a “Group 2A carcinogen” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1868a), or a significant carcinogen in cigarette MSS (1727), or overall as a borderline carcinogen by others (983), the specific tumorigenicity of mouse skin-painted or subcutaneously injected benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) is insignificant compared to that of its homolog, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMB[a]A), one of the four most potent tumorigenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) known (983). The isomeric C20H12 PAHs benzo[e]pyrene (B[e]P) and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) differ markedly in their specific tumorigenicities in studies involving mouse skin painting or subcutaneous injection (983). B[e]P under the usual laboratory test conditions is found to be essentially nontumorigenic on skin painting or subcutaneous
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
injection, whereas the isomeric B[a]P under the same conditions is one of the most potent tumorigens known. Of the 460 individual ingredients listed by Doull et al. [1053, see Table 1 in (3266)], 117 (25%) are esters (Table V-1) and all have been approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or by the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA). Of the 117 esters listed by Doull et al., 46 (39%) have been identified in untreated cigarette tobacco and/or its smoke (indicated by + in Table V-1) and 18 are either an homolog (indicated by H in Table V-1) or an isomer (indicated by I in Table V-1) of a known tobacco and/or smoke component. Doull et al. (1053) also listed 146 mixtures reportedly used by U.S. manufacturers as flavoring ingredients in tobacco products [see Table 2 in (3266)]. Many of these mixtures are obviously multicomponent items and detailed analyses of several of them (cardamom, cocoa, coffee, davana, licorice) indicated the presence of esters [see Table 3 in (3266)] listed by Doull et al. (1053). A similar situation exists with regard to flavorful mixtures used on tobacco products by non-U.S. manufacturers. Some thirty-four such mixtures are used on tobacco products by non-U.S. manufacturers [172a, 174a, 174b, 174c, see Table 7B in (3266)]. Compounds (forty-eight in number) other than those in the Doull et al. list are used in tobacco products by manufacturers in countries other than the United States [172a, 174a, 174b, 174c, see Table 7A in (3266)]. Among the fortyeight esters, are nineteen (21%) that have been identified in untreated cigarette tobacco and/or its smoke (indicated by + in Table V-2).* Table V-3 lists the esters identified to date in tobacco and/ or tobacco smoke.
*
Inadvertently, two esters (methyl anthranilate and methyl 2-octynate) already included in Table 1 in (3266) were included in Table 7A in (3266).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 382
11/13/08 5:15:22 PM
383
The Esters
Table V-1 Esters Used as Tobacco Ingredients by U.S. Tobacco Product Manufacturers (1053) Identified In CAS No. 123-86-4 151-05-3 115-95-7 105-87-3 141-78-6 112-06-1 3681-71-8 142-92-7 123-92-2 80-26-2 89-48-5 140-39-6 110-19-0 143-13-5 2442-10-6 24851-98-7 93-92-5 103-45-7 103-54-8 122-72-5 76-49-3 125-12-2 141-97-9 122-43-0 101-97-3 102-22-7 5421-17-0 101-41-7 102-19-2 101-94-0 102-13-6 102-20-5 104-21-2 122-91-8 102-17-0 93-89-0 93-58-3 120-51-4 134-20-3 118-61-6 119-36-8 87-19-4 118-55-8 118-58-1 121-98-2 94-46-2 106-65-0 109-21-7 10094-34-5 106-29-6 141-16-2 105-54-4 106-27-4 540-18-1 103-52-6 103-37-7
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
Smoke
Tobacco
Acetic acid, butyl ester Acetic acid, 1,1-dimethyl-2-phenylethyl ester Acetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-6-yl ester Acetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester Acetic acid, ethyl ester Acetic acid, heptyl ester Acetic acid, 3-hexen-1-yl ester Acetic acid, hexyl ester Acetic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Acetic acid, 2-(4-methyl-3-cyclohex-1-yl)-2-propyl ester Acetic acid, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexanyl ester Acetic acid, 4-methylphenyl ester Acetic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester Acetic acid, nonyl ester Acetic acid, 1-octen-3-yl ester Acetic acid, 2-pentyl-3-oxo-1-cyclopentyl-, methyl ester Acetic acid, 1-phenethyl ester Acetic acid, 2-phenethyl ester Acetic acid, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester Acetic acid, 3-phenylpropyl ester Acetic acid, endo-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-yl ester Acetic acid, exo-1,7,7,-trimethylbicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-yl ester Acetoacetic acid, ethyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, butyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, ethyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadieny-1-yl ester Benzeneacetic acid, hexyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, methyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, 4-methylphenyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester Benzeneacetic acid, phenylethyl ester; Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, acetate Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, formate Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, phenylacetate Benzoic acid, ethyl ester Benzoic acid, methyl ester Benzoic acid, phenylmethyl ester Benzoic acid, 2-amino-, methyl ester Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ethyl ester Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, methyl ester Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 2-methylpropyl ester Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenyl ester Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenylmethyl ester Benzoic acid, 4-methoxy-, methyl ester Benzoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Butanedioic acid, dimethyl ester Butanoic acid, butyl ester Butanoic acid, 1,1-dimethyl-2-phenylethyl ester Butanoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester Butanoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenyl ester Butanoic acid, ethyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Butanoic acid, pentyl ester Butanoic acid, phenylethyl ester Butanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester
+ — — — + H — — — + — — — — — — — + — — — — — H — — — + — — — — + — — + + + — — — — — — — — + H — — — + — — H +
+ — + — + Ha — + — + — — — H — — + + — — — — — H + — — + — — — H — — — + + + + + + — — + — + — H — — — + — — H + (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 383
11/13/08 5:15:23 PM
384
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-1 (Continued) Esters Used as Tobacco Ingredients by U.S. Tobacco Product Manufacturers (1053) Identified In CAS No. 7452-79-1 10032-15-2 109-19-3 1009-20-6 108-64-5 556-24-1 659-70-1 55066-56-3 140-26-1 140-27-2 10544-63-5 110-40-7 110-38-3 106-33-2 77-83-8 105-86-2 33467-73-1 110-45-2 638-49-3 614-99-3 611-13-2 126-14-7 106-30-9 628-97-7 123-66-0 2198-61-0 123-68-2 123-29-5 112-63-0 111-61-5 301-00-8 111-62-6 106-32-1 2035-99-6 638-25-5 111-12-6 539-82-2 539-88-8 102-76-1 105-53-3 105-37-3 122-63-4 103-56-0 7492-70-8 97-64-3 97-89-2 65416-14-0 103-93-5 109-15-9 103-48-0 103-36-6 103-26-4 7779-65-9 122-67-8 103-53-7
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
Smoke
Tobacco
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, hexyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, butyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadieny-1-yl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, ethyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, methyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 4-methyylphenyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, phenethyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester 2-Butenoic acid, ethyl ester Decanedioic acid, diethyl ester Decanoic acid, ethyl ester Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester Ethyl methylphenylglycidate Formic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester Formic acid, 3-hexenyl ester Formic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Formic acid, pentyl ester 2-Furancarboxylic acid, ethyl ester 2-Furancarboxylic acid, methyl ester α-D-Glucopyranoside, β-D-fructofuranosyl-, octaacetate Heptanoic acid, ethyl ester Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester Hexanoic acid, ethyl ester Hexanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Hexanoic acid, 2-propenyl ester Nonanoic acid, ethyl ester 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z), methyl ester Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester 9-Octadecenoic acid, ethyl ester Octanoic acid, ethyl ester Octanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Octanoic acid, pentyl ester 2-Octynoic acid, methyl ester Pentanoic acid, ethyl ester Pentanoic acid, 4-oxo-, ethyl ester 1,2,3-Propanetriol, triacetate Propanedioic acid, diethyl ester Propanoic acid, ethyl ester Propanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester Propanoic acid, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-butoxy-, butyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ethyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-methyl-4-oxo-4H-pyran-3-yl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 4-methylphenyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, octyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylethyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, ethyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, methyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 2-methylpropyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, phenylethyl ester
I — H — + — — — — — — — — — — — — — — H + — — + + — — — + — + — — — — — + — + H + — — — + — — — — H + H H H H
Ib — H + + — — + — H — + + — — + — — — + — + + + — — + + + + + + — — — + H — H + — — — — — — — — H — — — — —
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 384
11/13/08 5:15:23 PM
385
The Esters
Table V-1 (Continued) Esters Used as Tobacco Ingredients by U.S. Tobacco Product Manufacturers (1053) Identified In CAS No. 103-41-3 122-69-0 122-68-9 93-60-7 124-06-1 10580-24-2
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, phenylmethyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 3-phenylpropyl ester 3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, methyl ester Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester Undecanoic acid, butyl ester
a
H = a homolog of an identified tobacco and/or smoke component
b
I = an isomer of an identified tobacco and/or smoke component
Smoke
Tobacco
+ + — + — —
— — — + + H
Table V-2 Esters Used as Tobacco Ingredients by Tobacco Product Manufacturers Outside of the U.S. Identified In CAS No. 141-12-8 150-84-5 2497-18-9 126-64-7 87-20-7 539-90-2 76-50-6 103-38-8 16409-46-4 104-57-4 540-07-8 591-68-4 7549-33-9 105-68-0 103-28-6 78-35-3 97-62-1 103-59-3 110-27-0
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature Acetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,8-octadien-1-yl ester Acetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octen-1-yl ester Acetic acid, 2-hexen-1-yl ester Benzoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-6-yl ester Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 3-methylbutyl ester Butanoic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, endo-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-yl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, phenylmethyl ester Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexanyl ester, Formic acid, phenylmethyl ester Hexanoic acid, pentyl ester Pentanoic acid, butyl ester Propanoic acid, anisyl ester Propanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylmethyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-6-yl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl ester Tetradecanoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
Smoke
Tobacco
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — + — + — + + — + — — — — + — — — —
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 385
11/13/08 5:15:24 PM
386
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 386
11/13/08 5:15:25 PM
The Esters
387
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 387
11/13/08 5:15:26 PM
388
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 388
11/13/08 5:15:28 PM
The Esters
389
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 389
11/13/08 5:15:29 PM
390
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 390
11/13/08 5:15:31 PM
The Esters
391
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 391
11/13/08 5:15:33 PM
392
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 392
11/13/08 5:15:34 PM
The Esters
393
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 393
11/13/08 5:15:37 PM
394
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 394
11/13/08 5:15:38 PM
The Esters
395
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 395
11/13/08 5:15:42 PM
396
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 396
11/13/08 5:15:43 PM
The Esters
397
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 397
11/13/08 5:15:46 PM
398
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 398
11/13/08 5:15:54 PM
The Esters
399
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 399
11/13/08 5:15:59 PM
400
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 400
11/13/08 5:16:01 PM
The Esters
401
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 401
11/13/08 5:16:03 PM
402
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 402
11/13/08 5:16:06 PM
The Esters
403
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 403
11/13/08 5:16:08 PM
404
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 404
11/13/08 5:16:10 PM
The Esters
405
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 405
11/13/08 5:16:13 PM
406
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 406
11/13/08 5:16:15 PM
The Esters
407
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 407
11/13/08 5:16:17 PM
408
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 408
11/13/08 5:16:20 PM
The Esters
409
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 409
11/13/08 5:16:22 PM
410
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 410
11/13/08 5:16:25 PM
The Esters
411
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 411
11/13/08 5:16:27 PM
412
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 412
11/13/08 5:16:29 PM
The Esters
413
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 413
11/13/08 5:16:32 PM
414
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 414
11/13/08 5:16:34 PM
The Esters
415
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 415
11/13/08 5:16:36 PM
416
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 416
11/13/08 5:16:39 PM
The Esters
417
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 417
11/13/08 5:16:41 PM
418
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 418
11/13/08 5:16:43 PM
The Esters
419
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 419
11/13/08 5:16:46 PM
420
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 420
11/13/08 5:16:48 PM
The Esters
421
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 421
11/13/08 5:16:52 PM
422
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 422
11/13/08 5:16:54 PM
The Esters
423
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 423
11/13/08 5:16:57 PM
424
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 424
11/13/08 5:16:59 PM
The Esters
425
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 425
11/13/08 5:17:02 PM
426
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 426
11/13/08 5:17:04 PM
The Esters
427
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 427
11/13/08 5:17:06 PM
428
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 428
11/13/08 5:17:08 PM
The Esters
429
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 429
11/13/08 5:17:16 PM
430
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 430
11/13/08 5:17:17 PM
The Esters
431
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 431
11/13/08 5:17:19 PM
432
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 432
11/13/08 5:17:22 PM
The Esters
433
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 433
11/13/08 5:17:24 PM
434
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 434
11/13/08 5:17:26 PM
The Esters
435
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 435
11/13/08 5:17:29 PM
436
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 436
11/13/08 5:17:31 PM
The Esters
437
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 437
11/13/08 5:17:34 PM
438
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table V-3 (Continued) Esters in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C005.indd 438
11/13/08 5:17:36 PM
6
The Lactones
At various periods during the past fifty years, lactones in tobacco and tobacco smoke, particularly those in tobacco smoke, were discussed with regard to their toxicity, tumorigenicity, and genotoxicity. However, examination of the numerous lists of tobacco and tobacco smoke components classified as toxic, tumorigenic, and/or genotoxic reveals that seldom is a lactone included. The first significant list, derived from the 1986 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monograph on tobacco smoke (1870), was published in 1986 by Hoffmann and Wynder (1808). Over the next two decades, the Hoffmann-Wynder list was followed by successive similar but not identical lists by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) in 1990, Hoffmann et al. (1773) in 1993, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2825) in 1994, Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741, 1743) in 1997, 1998, and 2001, and Fowles and Bates (1217) in 2001 [see a summary of all these lists in Table 2 in Rodgman (3265)]. Based on its February 1985 meeting on tobacco smoking, the IARC Working Group wrote in 1986 [see p. 107 in (1870)]: About 80 lactones have been identified in tobacco smoke. These compounds, especially the γ-butyrolactones, and others, have alkylating potential and some have been reported to be carcinogenic in laboratory animals [Lawley (6A12)]. [see also Appendix 2, pp. 387–394) in (1870)]. Quantitatively, about half the lactones in the smoke consist of γ-butyrolactone [IARC (6A10)] (about 10 μg/cigarette) and its derivatives; δ-valerolactone and some alkylated and unsaturated δ-valerolactones, as well as coumarin [see pp. 427–430 in Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)], 6-methylcoumarin, and 3,4dihydrocoumarin have also been isolated [Schumacher et al. (3553)]. The occurrence of coumarin derivatives in smoke could be due to pyrolysis of polyphenols with a coumarin structure … or of plant extracts added to tobacco to enhance flavour [see pp. 427–430 in Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)]. Coumarin itself is carcinogenic to rats after oral administration [IARC (6A10)].
In its monograph, IARC made no comment on the ten lactones, including coumarin, that Lawley listed as inactive in oncogenesis tests [see Table XXVII in (6A12)], citing the 1965 study on coumarin by Dickens and Jones (6A06). IARC also failed to mention the 1984 listing by Slaga and DiGiovanni (3685) of the report by Wattenberg et al. (4149d), who described the anticarcinogenicity of coumarin towards the potent tumorigenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a] anthracene (DMB[a]A). At the time of the writing of the IARC 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking, over 100 lactones had been identified in tobacco smoke.
The information on pages 387–394 in Appendix 2 in (1870), particularly the information provided by the IARC Working Group on lactones on page 391, is:
Compound
Degree of Evidence in Animals (and Humans)
5. Lactones Coumarin γ-Butyrolactone
Limited evidence No evidence
In the cited Figure 5 [see page 93 in (1870)], only the following five lactones (substituted coumarins) of the nearly two dozen identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke were depicted, namely, scopoletin (7-hydroxy-6-methoxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one), scopolin [7-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-6-methoxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one], esculetin (6,7-dihydroxy-2H-1benzopyran-2-one), cichoriin [7-(β-D-glucopyranosy-loxy)6-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one], and scopoletin-β-gentiobioside. Two lactones that received some attention with regard to tobacco and smoke were aflatoxins, B1 and B2, primarily aflatoxin B1, the more toxic of the two. In 1970, Kaminski et al. (2024) examined the butts, ashes, and mainstream smoke (MSS) vapor phase and particulate phase from machinesmoked commercial nonfilter cigarettes treated with aflatoxin B1. In six separate smoking experiments, no trace of aflatoxin B1 was detected in any of the fractions examined. In their 1967 examination of several samples of leaf tobacco, including three types of good-grade tobaccos and heavily molded flue-cured tobacco, and of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC), Tso and Sorokin (3986) failed to detect aflatoxin B1. They also reported that no aflatoxin B1 was found in the CSC from cigarettes enriched with authentic aflatoxin B1 prior to smoking. They concluded that the added aflatoxin B1 was changed or decomposed during the smoking process. Later, Tso (3970) again reported the results of this aflatoxin B1 study at the 1967 World Conference on Smoking and Health. In his 2000 review of scientific publications on aflatoxin B, tobacco, and tobacco smoke, Massey (2484) concluded that aflatoxin B was not a contamination issue on tobaccos and, even if present, would decompose in the burning cigarette and would not transfer to smoke. As noted in the quotation from the 1986 IARC monograph, orally administered coumarin (2H-1-benzopyran-2one) had been reported as carcinogenic in rats. The results reported from several studies on the tumorigenicity of coumarin eventually resulted in coumarin being removed from
439
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 439
11/13/08 7:07:38 PM
440
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
OH 6 7
5
8
4
H2 C
3
O
O
O
OO
I
OH
O
II
OH
HO
O V
O
O
IV
O
O
O
COOH
III
OH
O
O
OH COOH OH
OH COOH
Figure VI-1 Relationships between coumarin, its derivatives, and dicumarol.
the flavor formulations used throughout the tobacco industry on cigarette and pipe tobacco. Coumarin was considered by the consumer as a significantly acceptable contribution to tobacco smoke. Coumarin was identified by Schumacher and Vestal as a minor component of untreated Oriental tobacco in the early 1960s (3560). The initial concern in the early 1960s about the addition of coumarin {I} to tobacco products was whether or not it was converted during the smoking process to dicumarol (3,3’-methylenebis[4-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one]) {II} (Figure VI-1). Dicumarol is a powerful anticoagulant that had been identified in sweet clover hay (6A21). In previous metabolic studies, it had been reported that coumarin was not a precursor of dicumarol {II} (6A03, 6A15) or of o-coumaric acid [3-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoic acid] {III} (6A21). {III} was known to be a precursor of dicumarol via 4-hydroxycoumarin {IV}. Laboratory animals (rats, rabbits) fed coumarin excreted 4-hydroxycoumarin {IV} (6A04). Between 70% and 90% of coumarin administered to humans resulted in excretion of 7-hydroxycoumarin {V} (6A17), a coumarin derivative never indicted as dangerous to any species or proposed as a dicumarol precursor.
Newell reported in 1963 that (1) inclusion in cigarette tobacco of 3-14C-coumarin {I} gave no dicumarol {II} in either the MSS or the sidestream smoke (SSS) and (2) inclusion in cigarette tobacco of unlabeled dicumarol gave no dicumarol {II} in either the MSS or the SSS (2757). Of the 3-14C-coumarin applied to the tobacco blend, Newell reported that 60% appeared unchanged in the MSS and SSS. To assess the claims of the possible adverse effect of including coumarin in flavor formulations, several reports and memoranda were written in the late 1970s about the coumarin situation in an obvious attempt to put the issue in perspective. In 1978, Buchner (6A05) listed several of the authorities that incorrectly cited negative tumorigenicity results as positive, for example, in 1976, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (6A16) incorrectly cited results published in 1955 by Roe and Salaman (6A20). Much weight was given to the reported findings of Griepentrog (6A02, 6A07), the only findings on the induction of bile duct carcinomas in coumarin-fed rats. Buchner (6A05) summarized many of the results of studies that raised questions about the classification of coumarin as a carcinogen, for example, the negative tumorigenicity results reported by
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 440
11/13/08 7:07:39 PM
The Lactones
Hagan et al. (6A08) and Hazleton et al. (6A09). He also cited several genotoxicity studies in which coumarin was found to be inactive against human chromosomes (6A22) and against Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 100 in the Ames test [Buchner, private communication, see Reference 26 in (6A22)]. Paralleling the report by Buchner were several memoranda on coumarin by Rodgman in 1978 (6A18) and 1982 (6A19) in which the problems of misinterpretation of data and contrary data pertinent to coumarin were presented. Included in the memoranda were the negative mutagenicity results obtained in Ames tests with five strains (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100) of Salmonella typhimurium on coumarin conducted in-house by Lee (6A13) at R.J. Reynolds Research and Development. His results were confirmed on a coded coumarin sample among a set of coded samples tested at a contract laboratory (6A14). Despite the controversies over the tumorigenicity of coumarin, its use in tobacco flavor formulations was subsequently discontinued throughout the tobacco industry worldwide. In its 2000 evaluation of the tumorigenicity of coumarin (2H-1-benzopyran-2-one), IARC (6A11) noted the following as of 21 August, 2000: Coumarin is a natural product occurring in the essential oils of a large number of plants, such as cinnamon, cassia, lavender and woodruff. It is used for its fragrance in many personal care products (perfumes, deodorants, soaps) and in tobacco, in household and industrial products to mask unpleasant odours and, in some countries, as a flavouring agent in food and beverages. It has also been used to treat several medical conditions. Exposure to coumarin may occur from its
441 production, its natural presence in many plants and essential oils, and its several industrial, medical and consumer uses.
According to IARC, no data were available to its Working Group on the carcinogenicity of coumarin in humans. After assessment of various studies in which coumarin was administered to laboratory animals, IARC concluded that the evidence was limited in laboratory animals on the carcinogenicity of coumarin. IARC described its overall evaluation of coumarin as a carcinogen as follows: “Coumarin is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans.” In 1998, Abbott (6A01) described the results of the examination of numerous food additives by the World Health Organization. The food additives in this particular study comprised a series of so-called aliphatic lactones. Among the lactones discussed were several that not only are used as foodstuff additives but also occur in tobacco and/or its smoke and several that are used as tobacco additives. The results of several toxicological studies (acute toxicity, shortand long-term toxicity, carcinogenicity) and genotoxic studies on the lactones were described in detail by Abbott. Table VI-1 presents the results listed by Abbott on those lactones that are used in tobacco products. Table VI-2 lists the tobacco and/or smoke lactones that, according to the Doull et al. listing (1053), are or have been used recently as components in flavor formulations for tobacco. The number of lactones identified to date in tobacco and/ or tobacco smoke is 304. Of these, 162 have been identified in tobacco smoke, 201 in tobacco, and 59 in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Table VI-3 lists the lactones identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke to date.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 441
11/13/08 7:07:40 PM
442
78836_C006.indd 442
Table VI-1 Some Biological Properties of Lactones Used as Additives in Foodstuffs as Well as in Tobacco Products (6A01) Lactone CAS No.
CAS Nomenclature
104-50-7 96-48-0
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-butyldihydro2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-
Common Name γ-octalactone γ-butyrolactone
Smoke or Tobacco Component
Flavor Formulation Additive
+ +
+ +
Genotoxicity a
negative
Acute Toxicity, LD50, mg/kg >5000 (rat)c 1245 (mouse)
Short-term Toxicity, NOELb, mg/kg/day 300 (rat) 175 (mouse)
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-ethyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-heptyl-
γ-hexalactone γ-undecalactone
+ -
+ +
706-14-9 108-29-2 2305-05-7 104-61-0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-hexyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-octyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-pentyl-
γ-decalactone} γ-valerolactone} γ-dodecalactone} γ-nonalactone}
+ + +
+ + + +
105-21-5 28664-35-9 698-10-2 591-12-8 7779-50-2 106-02-5 27593-23-3 3301-94-8 713-95-1 710-04-3 823-22-3 705-86-2 698-76-0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-propyl2(5H)-Furanone, 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl2(3H)-Furanone, 5-methylOxacycloheptadec-7-en-2-one Oxacyclohexadecan-2-one 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-pentyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-butyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-heptyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-hexyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-methyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-pentyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-propyl-
γ-heptalactone
+ + ‑ + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
α-angelica lactone ω-pentadecalactone 6-amyl-α-pyrone δ-nonalactone} δ-dodecalactone δ-undecalactone} δ-hexalactone δ-decalactone} δ-octalactone}
a
References to the various genotoxicity systems used may be found in Abbott [see Table 6 in (6A01)].
b
NOEL = no observed effect level
c
References to procedures used may be found in Abbott [see Table 3 in (6A01)]
11/13/08 7:07:41 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
6 negative 2 positive
3 negative 3 positive negative
>5000 (rat) 18500 (rat) >5000 (rat) >5000 (rat) >5000 (rat) 9780 (rat) 3440 (guinea pig) >5000 (rat)
2800 (mouse) 2 negative
>5000 (rat) >5000
>14 (rat)
>50 (rat) >72 (rat)
>1.3 (rat) >17 (rat)
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
695-06-7 104-67-6
443
The Lactones
Table VI-2 Tobacco and/or Smoke Lactones Used in Flavor Formulations Identified In CAS No.
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
50-81-7 96-48-0 104-50-7 695-06-7 104-67-6 706-14-9 108-29-2 2305-05-7 104-61-0 105-21-5 591-12-8 27538-09-6
L-Ascorbic acid {L-gulofuranolactone, 3-oxo-} 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-butyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-ethyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-heptyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-hexyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-octyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-pentyl2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-propyl2(3H)-Furanone, 5-methyl3(2H)-Furanone, 3-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl- b
551-08-6 564-20-5 7779-50-2 106-02-5 3301-94-8 713-95-1 710-04-3 2721-22-4 705-86-2 698-76-0
1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3-butylideneNaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(1H)-one, decahydro-3a,6,6,9a-tetramethylOxacycloheptadec-7-en-2-one Oxacyclohexadecan-2-one 2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-butyl- b 2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-heptyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-hexyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-nonyl- b 2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-pentyl2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-propyl-
a
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053) ascorbic acid 4-hydroxybutanoic acid lactone γ-octalactone γ-hexalactone γ-undecalactone γ-decalactone γ-valerolactone γ-dodecalactone γ-nonalactone γ-heptalactone 4-hydroxy-3-pentenoic acid lactone 3-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)furanoneb 3-butylidenephthalide sclareolide ω-6-hexadecenlactone ω-pentadecalactone δ-nonalactoneb δ-dodecalactone δ-undecalactone tetradecalactoneb δ-decalactone δ-octalactone
Smoke
Tobacco
+ + + – + -
+ + + + Ha + + H + + + -
+ -
H + H + H H H H + +
H = homolog of an identified tobacco and/or smoke component This lactone is not included in the Doull et al. list (1053) but is included in flavor formulations used by cigarette manufacturers outside of the U.S. [see Table 7A in (3266)]
b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 443
11/13/08 7:07:41 PM
444
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 444
11/13/08 7:07:42 PM
The Lactones
445
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 445
11/13/08 7:07:44 PM
446
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 446
11/13/08 7:07:45 PM
The Lactones
447
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 447
11/13/08 7:07:46 PM
448
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 448
11/13/08 7:07:48 PM
The Lactones
449
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 449
11/13/08 7:07:49 PM
450
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 450
11/13/08 7:07:53 PM
The Lactones
451
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 451
11/13/08 7:08:00 PM
452
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 452
11/13/08 7:08:06 PM
The Lactones
453
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 453
11/13/08 7:08:08 PM
454
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 454
11/13/08 7:08:10 PM
The Lactones
455
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 455
11/13/08 7:08:13 PM
456
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 456
11/13/08 7:08:14 PM
The Lactones
457
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 457
11/13/08 7:08:24 PM
458
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 458
11/13/08 7:08:28 PM
The Lactones
459
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 459
11/13/08 7:08:30 PM
460
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VI-3 (Continued) Lactones Identified In Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C006.indd 460
11/13/08 7:08:33 PM
7
Anhydrides
The number of anhydrides identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke is small. In 1988, Roberts (3215) reported that there were only ten anhydrides identified in tobacco, ten identified in tobacco smoke, and four in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The number of anhydrides in tobacco and tobacco smoke has not changed substantially since that time. There are presently thirteen anhydrides identified in tobacco, thirteen in tobacco smoke, and six in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. In his 1984 review of the carcinogenesis induced by alkylating agents, Lawley (Table XXV, p. 434 in 7A04) tabulated the findings of Dickens and Jones on a study of the tumorigenicity (sarcogenicity) of maleic anhydride (7A01) and 2,3dimethylmaleic anhydride and succinic anhydride (7A02) administered by subcutaneous injection to Wistar rats. In its 1986 monograph, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) wrote very little on the few anhydrides in tobacco smoke [see p. 107 in (1870)]. IARC commented: At least eight acid anhydrides have been found in cigarette smoke, including maleic anhydride and succinic anhydride and their alkylated derivatives [Schumacher et al. (3553), Newell et al. (2769)]. These smoke constituents are of particular concern because of their alkylating potential. Maleic anhydride, 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride and succinic anhydride have produced local tumours in one experiment in rats [Dickens and Jones (7A01, 7A02), IARC (7A03)].
An inserted comment in the IARC monograph referred the reader to Appendix 2, pages 389–394 in (1870), which listed the components in tobacco smoke that had been evaluated for carcinogenicity in the IARC monograph series. The tumorigenicity of succinic anhydride was listed as:
Compound
It is obvious from the review by Lawley (7A04) and the data in the Dickens and Jones reports (7A01, 7A02) that the anhydrides are sarcogens, not carcinogens, that is, they do not fit the definition of a carcinogen, a factor that induces a carcinoma. At R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (RJRT) R&D, two anhydrides, 3,4-diethyldihydro-2,4-furandione (diethylsucccinic anhydride) and 3,4-dimethyldihydro-2,4-furandione (dimethylsucccinic anhydride) were identified by Jones and Latimer during their research on Oriental tobacco composition. The two anhydrides were listed in their 1943 report on the Oriental tobacco components they identified through the end of 1942 (1980). In a subsequent RJRT research effort in 1963 and 1964, several anhydrides (see Table VII-1) were isolated from tobacco smoke and identified by Fredrickson (1233, 1235) during his study of the composition of burley tobacco smoke condensate. Two decades later, several additional anhydrides (see Table VII-1) were identified as components of Oriental tobacco by Schumacher (3543). Table VII-1 lists the twenty anhydrides identified to date in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. None of the anhydrides listed in Table VII-1 was included in any of the many publications issued between 1986 and 2001 in which the toxicants in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke were listed (1217, 1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808, 2825). No anhydride was included in the 1994 Doull et al. list (1053) on compounds in flavor formulations used on tobacco products by members of the U.S. tobacco industry.
Degree of Evidence in Animals (and Humans)
7. Agricultural chemicals and derivatives Succinic anhydride Limited evidence
461
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C007.indd 461
11/13/08 5:19:17 PM
462
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VII-1 Anhydrides in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C007.indd 462
11/13/08 5:19:18 PM
Anhydrides
463
Table VII-1 (CONTINUED) Anhydrides in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C007.indd 463
11/13/08 5:19:19 PM
8
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
The four macromolecules that have been called the “building blocks of life” are carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Tso (3873) estimated that as much as 75% of all the carbon from CO2 that is reduced by plants enters into some form of carbohydrate for at least a brief period of time. Via numerous metabolic pathways these carbohydrates are converted into hundreds of functional molecules necessary to sustain life. There are 279 components in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke that may be considered either as a complete carbohydrate or one in which a carbohydrate is linked to another structure, such as a glycoside. This number is greater than the 156 listed by Tso in his 1990 book [see Table 1.38 in (3873)] because of our inclusion of the carbohydrate-combined components. The following indicates the difference in numbers:
Tso Carbohydrates
Reference
Total
Smoke
Tobacco
Tobacco and Smoke
Table 1.38 in (3873) Table VIII-3
156 279
30 35
138 271
12 27
A great number of carbohydrate-linked components, mostly in tobacco, involve the linkage of a carbohydrate to a 2H-1-benzopyran-2-one or 4H-1-benzopyran-4-one, which may not only be hydroxylated, for example, 6-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-7-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one (esculin), but also may have one or more hydroxyphenyl links, for example, 3-[(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)oxy]-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)5,7-dihydroxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (quercitrin), 3-[[6O-(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl] oxy]-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (rutin), and 3-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-5,7dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (kaempferol glycoside). Components such as these were classified as polyphenols. Tobacco components such as the latter three may be the precursors of part of the phenols yield in tobacco smoke. Snook et al. (8A08) determined the levels of rutin and kaempferol glycoside in sixty-two different species of Nicotiana. Their levels ranged from <0.005 to 1.6% for rutin and <0.005 to 0.16% for the kaempferol glycoside. There are, of course, in tobacco several carbohydrate-linked benzopyranones that lack an hydroxyphenyl group, for example, 6-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-7-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2one (esculin) and 7-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-6-methoxy2H-1-benzopyran-2-one (scopolin).
As indicated in Table VIII-1, only a few tobacco and/or tobacco smoke carbohydrates are used in the flavor formulations used by cigarette manufacturers in the United States (1053) and in other countries (3266). None of those used in that way is linked to a noncarbohydrate entity. The use of tobacco containing various carbohydrate additives, such as the various sugars listed in Table VIII-1, has been the subject of much discussion recently in attempts to link such additives to medical problems induced by cigarette smoke. The major concern was the generation of carbonyl compounds such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde. Although Baker (8A02), in his letter to the editor of Food and Chemical Toxicology, agrees with the statements of Talhout et al. (3865b) that addition of sugars to tobacco results in increased yields of formaldehyde in the mainstream smoke (MSS), he also provided numerous references [Baker (8A01), Baker and Bishop (172a, 172b), Baker et al. (172c, 174a, 174b, 174c, 8A03), Baker and Smith (174e), Gori (1332), Massey (2484a), Rodgman (3264), Rustemeier et al. (3370), Seeman et al. (3579, 8A06), Thornton and Massey (3913), Zilkey et al. (4418)] and much discussion to counter the assertions by Talhout et al. (3865b) that sugar addition had an adverse effect on the biological properties of the MSS. Not included in Baker were the facts that (1) Doull et al. (1053), in their detailed 1994 assessment of 599 additives used by members of the U.S. tobacco industry in cigarette manufacture, reported no significant biological problem from the use of sugars in the flavor formulations and (2) Dalhamn et al. (892) had reported in 1968 that a significant percentage of water-soluble MSS vapor-phase components, such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and other carbonyls, never reached the respiratory tract cilia of the smoker because of their solution in the fluids coating the oral cavity. The findings of Dalhamn et al. (892) were a confirmation of those by Rodgman et al. (3306), Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, an independent contract laboratory (8A04), and the repeated assertions by Wynder and Hoffmann that such would be the case with water-soluble ciliastats (4330, 4332). In their mid-1960s publications, Wynder and Hoffmann commented several times on the fact that most of the known ciliastatic components of MSS demonstrated to be ciliastatic in various in vitro systems were water soluble and this property would markedly influence their fate and behavior during and after inhalation. Wynder and Hoffmann (4330) noted: As far as human smoking habits are concerned, it remains also to be estimated to which extent volatile smoke components reach the bronchial tree. Preliminary studies indicate that a significant proportion of the gaseous components is being retained within the oral cavity. 465
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 465
11/13/08 5:19:49 PM
466
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-1 Tobacco and/or Smoke Carbohydrates Used in Flavor Formulations Identified in CAS No.
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
57-48-7 59-23-4 50-99-7 57-50-1 50-99-7 31103-86-3 50-70-4
D-Fructose D-Galactose α-D-Glucose α-D-Glucopyranoside, β-D-fructofuranosyl- {sucrose} α-D-Glucose Mannose Sorbitola
a
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
Smoke
Tobacco
sugars sugars sugars sugars sugars sugars glucitol
+ + + + + + -
+ + + + + + +
orbitol (glucitol)) is not included in the Doull et al. list (1053) but is included in flavor formulations used by cigarette manufacturers S outside of the U.S. [see Table 7A in (3266)].
As noted by Baker (8A02), Talhout et al. (3865b) commented on the effect on MSS carbonyl component yields produced by additions to tobacco of 12% of three sugars but they did not describe the effect of the additions of 4% of each sugar, an addition level that more closely resembled that used commercially. Table VIII-2 lists the changes reported by Shelar et al. (8A07) in per cigarette MSS yield of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, and acrolein by addition of 4% fructose, glucose, or sucrose to two different burley samples. Not discussed by either Baker (8A02) or Talhout et al. (3865b) was a 1970 study by Best (297) in which a flue-cured tobacco sample was treated with sugar to raise its level from 12.6% to 21.0%. Even though the sugar addition to the flue-cured tobacco represented a 66% increase, the MSS yields of carbonyl components increased: Formaldehyde from 35.4 μg/cigarette to 48.8 μg/cigarette, a 37.8% increase; acetaldehyde from 998 μg/ cigarette to 1020 μg/cigarette, a 2.2% increase; acrolein from 124 μg/cigarette to 131 μg/cigarette, a 5.6% increase. In his review of the genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate, DeMarini (933) described in detail the 1979 findings of Mizusaki et al. (2568) on the effect of the cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) from high-sugar tobacco (20% to 30%) vs. the CSC from low-sugar tobacco
Later, Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 542 in (4332)] wrote: Water-soluble volatile components, which are primarily responsible for the results of the acute in vitro short-term cilia toxicity tests, are, to a large extent, removed when cigarette smoke contacts the saliva in the mouth and the abundant secretions of the trachea and main bronchi.
They added [see p. 646 in (4332)]: In man’s manner of smoking, however, volatile components are retained to a significant degree in the oral cavity and may, therefore, be far less important than when tested experimentally.
Baker (8A02), in the letter to the editor of Food and Chemical Toxicology in which he responded to the assertions of Talhout et al. (3865b), noted several early studies cited by Talhout et al., those of Thornton and Massey (3913) and Shelar et al. (8A07) in which high levels of a carbohydrate (sugar) were added to the tobacco, resulting in a significant increase in the MSS yield of several carbonyl compounds, namely formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein. However, the added carbohydrate greatly exceeded the amount usually added in an industrial situation.
Table VIII-2 Effect of Sugars Added to Burley Tobacco on Mainstream Smoke Aldehyde and Ketone Yields (8A07) Per Cigarette MSS Yield Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acrolein
Burley 1 + 4% fructose + 4% glucose + 4% sucrose
16.0 18.2 (13.8%) 15.7 (-2%) 20.4 (27.5%)
507 591 (16.6%) 553 (9.1%) 574 (13.2%)
269 333 (23.8%) 335 (24.5%) 364 (35.3%)
118 135 (14.4%) 123 (4.2%) 139 (17.8%)
Burley 2 + 4% fructose + 4% glucose + 4% sucrose
11.2 12.0 (7.1%) 18.6 (66.1%) 18.2 (62.5%)
578 652 (12.8%) 567 (-2%) 561 (-3%)
306 330 (7.8%) 216 (-29.5%) 270 (-12%)
118 130 (10.2%) 93 (-21.2%) 109 (-7.7%)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 466
11/13/08 5:19:50 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
(5%) in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium strain TA 1538). The high-sugar tobacco CSC was much less mutagenic than the low-sugar tobacco CSC. DeMarini (933) also summarized the results of a study by Sato et al. (8A05) in which various sugars were added to the tobacco in high-“tar” and low-“tar” cigarettes, the CSCs collected, and tested for mutagenicity in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium TA 98 and TA 100, with and without activation. The sugars tested included glucose, fructose, galactose, lactose, sucrose, and sorbitol. The mutagenicity of the CSC from the sugartreated high-“tar” cigarettes was reduced 35% from the mutagenicity observed for the CSC from the untreated tobacco cigarette. The mutagenicity of the CSC from the low-“tar” cigarettes was reduced 36% from mutagenicity of the CSC from the untreated tobacco cigarette. In the National Cancer Institute study of the third set of cigarettes, Gori (1332) reported the effect of adding invert sugar at a level approximating that used commercially to the Standard Experimental Blend III (SEB III) [see Table 8, p. 99, cigarette 81 in (1332)] on the per cigarette MSS yields of numerous smoke components, including formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein [see Table 8, p. 59 in (1332)]. The
467
multiple samples of SEB III yielded an average of 33.8 μg/ cigarette of formaldehyde, 1212 μg/cigarette of acetaldehyde, and 110 μg/cigarette of acrolein. Cigarette 81, fabricated from SEB III with added invert sugar, yielded 32.3 μg/cigarette of formaldehyde, 1090 μg/cigarette of acetaldehyde, and 113 μg/cigarette of acrolein. Dermal assays were initiated with 100 ICR Swiss female mice in each group. Multiple samples of CSC from SEB III at 12.5 mg and 25.0 mg doses produced twenty-seven and forty-seven tumor-bearing animals (TBA), respectively [see Table 2, p. 86 in (1332)], whereas the CSC from the invert sugar-treated SEB III at 12.5 mg and 25.0 mg doses produced nineteen and forty-one TBA, respectively [see Table 3, p. 87, cigarette 81 in (1332)]. However, the CSCs studied would be devoid of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein because of their vaporization during the collection, solution preparation, and administration of the CSCs. Table VIII-3 lists the carbohydrates and their derivatives identified to date in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. Of the 279 identified carbohydrates listed, most of them are tobacco components: 271 have been identified in tobacco vs. only 35 in smoke; 27 have been identified in both tobacco and smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 467
11/13/08 5:19:50 PM
468
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 468
11/13/08 5:19:51 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
469
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 469
11/13/08 5:19:52 PM
470
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 470
11/13/08 5:19:53 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
471
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 471
11/13/08 5:19:55 PM
472
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 472
11/13/08 5:19:57 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
473
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 473
11/13/08 5:20:05 PM
474
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 474
11/13/08 5:20:16 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
475
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 475
11/13/08 5:20:17 PM
476
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 476
11/13/08 5:20:20 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
477
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 477
11/13/08 5:20:26 PM
478
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 478
11/13/08 5:20:29 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
479
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 479
11/13/08 5:20:37 PM
480
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 480
11/13/08 5:20:38 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
481
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 481
11/13/08 5:20:41 PM
482
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 482
11/13/08 5:20:43 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
483
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 483
11/13/08 5:20:50 PM
484
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 484
11/13/08 5:20:52 PM
Carbohydrates and Their Derivatives
485
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 485
11/13/08 5:20:54 PM
486
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table VIII-3 (continued) Carbohydrates in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C008.indd 486
11/13/08 5:20:58 PM
9
Phenols and Quinones
IX.A Phenols Examination of the extensive literature on the composition of tobacco smoke reveals that considerable effort was expended in the early 1960s in defining the nature of the phenolic components of tobacco smoke. Subsequently, even though the identity of many phenols in tobacco smoke are now known, research has indicated their number identified in tobacco smoke is much fewer than the number of identified polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). With the tremendous effort expended on the identification of PAHs and some of their nitrogen analogs in tobacco smoke, what series of events triggered the interest in and the emphasis on phenols in tobacco smoke in the early 1960s? The reports by Wynder et al. (4306a, 4306c) in the early 1950s that cigarette smoke “tar” or cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) was tumorigenic to mouse skin prompted an intense search for the responsible component(s). Initially, the PAHs were selected for investigation because of the wealth of chemical and biological data generated on a great number of them following the synthesis of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) in 1929 (760, 1184), the isolation of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) from coal tar in 1932 (796a, 797), and the demonstration of the potent tumorigenicity of both of them to mouse skin (194, 2078). Almost immediately after the report by Wynder et al. (4306a) of the mouse skin-painting results with tobacco “tar,” the PAHs were proposed by some investigators to be the major tumor initiators in CSC. Because of its level in CSC and its potency in mouse-skin tumorigenesis, B[a]P was defined as the most significant of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. However, it was soon recognized that neither the B[a] P content nor its tumorigenicity could explain the biological response observed in the mouse skin-painting bioassay. Similarly, neither the total content of the PAHs tumorigenic to mouse skin nor their summed tumorigenicities could explain the observed biological response. In fact, it was pointed out repeatedly over the next several decades that the levels of B[a]P and other tumorigenic PAHs in CSC accounted for less than 3% of the observed tumorigenicity [Wynder and Wright (4353, 4354), Wynder and Hoffmann (4307, 4308, 4312, 4317, 4319, 4332, 4342), Druckrey (1056), Roe (3310, 3311), USPHS (3999, 4005, 4009, 4010), Lazar et al. (2320), Stedman (3797), Selikoff et al. (3584a), Coultson (830)]. As early as the mid-1950s, Wynder and Wright (4353) noted that the concentration of B[a]P in cigarette tar was insufficient to account for its observed carcinogenicity to mouse epidermis: “The concentration in which benzo[a] pyrene seems to be in cigarette tar is insufficient to account for the observed carcinogenic activity to mouse epidermis.” At the 1957 Blatnik Committee hearings, Wynder reported Wright’s opinion (4282a) on the subject as well as his own
(4296). Wynder noted that much attention had been directed at the PAH B[a]P. So much in fact that, as he stated, B[a] P had become an issue in itself because it was one of the known tumorigenic substances and everyone tried to blame everything on it alone. During his testimony, he also noted that his Sloan Kettering group had repeatedly stated that the amount of B[a]P in tobacco “tar” was insufficient to explain the animal results published by his group. He added that cigarette “tar” contained numerous other B[a]P-related compounds much more active than B[a]P and they most likely accounted for the majority of the activity, and it was more or less academic whether it was B[a]P or a dibenzopyrene or a dibenzanthracene or a substituted B[a]P because they were all formed in the same manner during the tobacco smoking process. That same year, Wynder and Wright (4354) wrote that, to that date, no carcinogens had been identified in large enough quantities in tobacco “tar” or its fractions to account for the observed activity in mouse skin-painting studies: We have demonstrated experimentally … that 0.0001 per cent or even 0.0005 per cent benzopyrene in acetone will not produce any tumors in the present experimental mouse or rabbit groups. Thus, there is conclusive proof that the animal results cannot be solely due to the benzopyrene content of tobacco . The benzopyrene content of the total tar as well as the active fractions is far too low to account alone for the positive results [in laboratory animal]. So far, no carcinogens have been identified in large enough quantity in tobacco tar or its fractions to account for the observed activity.
These Wynder-Wright results led to an intensive but unsuccessful eighteen-month search for a “supercarcinogenic” PAH by Wright. The absence of such a PAH was subsequently confirmed by the USDA group at Athens, Georgia [Snook (3732), Snook et al. (3756–3758)] by their identification of over 500 PAHs in the PAH fraction from cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS), an identification procedure that completely accounted for the fraction in the cigarette smoke studied. In 1959, unable to explain the bioassay (mouse skin-painting) results with CSC on the basis of either its B[a]P content (less than 2% explainable) or its total tumorigenic PAH content (less than 3% explainable), Wynder and Hoffmann (4307) added the concept of promotion by low molecular weight phenols to the concept of tumor initiation by PAHs in an attempt (unsuccessful) to explain the bioassay results. A similar comment that the amount of tumorigenic PAHs found in CSC could not by themselves account for the total biological activity observed was included in a more detailed publication (4307). They also stated (4308) that the higher PAHs played an important role in the carcinogenicity of CSC but when the various known concentrations of the 487
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 487
11/13/08 5:22:27 PM
488
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
carcinogenic PAHs, as estimated in CSC, were summed, it was obvious that they could not account for the established carcinogenicity of the CSC nor of its isolated PAH fraction. Several carcinogenic higher aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons [are] present in tobacco smoke condensate. They include benzo[a]pyrene …, benzo[e]pyrene …, chrysene …, benz[a] anthracene …, dibenz[a,h]anthracene …, and dibenzo[a,i] pyrene … From the amount in which these materials have been found in tobacco smoke condensate it was evident that these, by themselves, could not account for the total biological activity observed.
In 1960, Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported the identification of several aza-arenes (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) not only structurally similar to some of the known tumorigenic PAHs in CSC but also reported to be tumorigenic under certain conditions to mouse skin. Adding this class of tumorigenic cigarette smoke components to the assessment of the tumorigenicity of CSC failed to account for more than a few percent of the observed response. However, it should be noted that Candeli et al. (587) could not confirm the findings of Van Duuren et al. on the presence of these three aza-arenes in cigarette MSS. During the next three decades, other research groups, as shown in Table IX.A-1, in Germany, Japan, and the United States were also unable to confirm the presence in cigarette MSS of dibenz[a,h] acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and dibenzo[c,g]carbazole. Wynder and Hoffmann (4312) wrote that the PAHs in CSC accounted for not more than 3% of the total biological activity observed in mouse-skin bioassays:
The polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons are mainly formed during the combustion of tobacco. The tobacco of our standard cigarettes contains only very minute quantities of benzo(a)pyrene (0.02 ppm). A bioassay indicates that these polycyclic hydrocarbons of the condensate by themselves, however, can account for not more than 3 per cent of the total biological activity.
They also wrote (4313) that the established carcinogenicity of CSC to mouse epidermis could to a great extent be accounted for on the basis of initiating carcinogens, largely PAHs, and promoting substances, a major group of which was the phenols. This statement was not true in 1961, nor is it true now. Wynder and Hoffmann (4314), unable to explain the mouse skin-painting bioassay results with CSC on the basis of its content of tumorigenic PAHs and aza-arenes, promoting and/or cocarcinogenic phenols, and promoting and/or cocarcinogenic nontumorigenic PAHs, added the concept of ciliastasis in an attempt (unsuccessful) to explain cigarette smoke tumorigenicity in smokers’ lungs. In their lengthy 1964 review of tobacco carcinogenesis, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319) stated that no one could deny that tobacco products were tumorigenic even though no single component in tobacco smoke could by itself or jointly with other components account for the observed tumorigenic activity of such tobacco products to the skin of laboratory animals: It is furthermore true that none of the agents is carcinogenic in the concentrations in which they are present in tobacco products.
Table IX.A-1 Dibenz[a,h]acridine (I), Dibenz[a,j]acridine (II), and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole (III) in Nicotine Pyrolysates (Pyr) and Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Condensate Dibenz[a,h]acridine
Dibenz[a,j]acridine
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole
Investigators
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Van Duuren et al. (4027) Candeli et al. (587), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Kaburaki et al. (2006) Schmeltz et al. (3499) Schmeltz et al. (3512) Snook (3733) Snook et al. (3750) Grimmer et al. (1409) Kamata et al. (2021) Sasaki and Moldoveanu (3414) Rustemeier et al. (3370)
yes NE no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
yes no NE NE no no no no no no no
yes NE no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
yes yes NE NE no no no no no no yes
no NE NE no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
yes NE NE NE no no no no NE NE NE
yes = Compound identified. no = Compound not found or identified. NE = Substrate not examined for compound in question. Examination of these results indicates that Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported the identification of the three N-heterocyclic compounds (I, II, and III) in MSS CSC and two of them (I and II) in a nicotine pyrolysate; whereas, Candeli et al. (587) failed to identify I but did identify II in MSS CSC. The 1963 Candeli et al. findings on II in MSS CSC were not confirmed in 1979 by investigators (3512) from the same laboratory: Hoffmann was a participant in both the 1963 and 1979 studies. Two studies (3499, 3512) confirmed the 1960 report by Van Duuren et al. that 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole (III) was not present in a nicotine pyrolysate.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 488
11/13/08 5:22:28 PM
Phenols and Quinones
Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) expressed similar views on the tumorigenicity of tobacco smoke components in their 1967 book, but they continued to maintain that the PAHs in cigarette smoke were important as tumor initiators: While BaP and other carcinogenic PAH can by themselves account for only a small portion of the total tumorigenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate, probably less than 2%, they are, nevertheless, of obligatory importance as tumor initiators.
The next year, Wynder and Hoffmann (4342) wrote, “Carcinogenic polynuclear hydrocarbons in the concentrations present in tobacco ‘tar’ clearly do not, by themselves, account for the observed carcinogenicity.” On several occasions, the U.S. Surgeon General in his periodic reports on smoking and health discussed the relationship between the levels of PAHs in cigarette smoke, their tumorigenic potency to mouse skin, and the observed biological response with CSC in mouse skin-painting bioassays. The results of a number of such assays [mouse skin-painting] present a puzzling anomaly: the total tar from cigarettes has about 40 times the carcinogenic potency of the benzo(a) pyrene present in the tar. The other carcinogens known to be present in tobacco smoke are, with the exception of dibenzo(a,i)pyrene, much less potent than benzo(a)pyrene and they are present in smaller amounts. Apparently, therefore, the whole is greater than the sum of the known parts. [see p. 58 in (3999)] Benzo(a)pyrene is present in much larger concentrations than is any other carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbon. The inability to account for the carcinogenicity of the tobacco products, except to a very minor degree, by the amount of benzo(a)pyrene present was unanticipated. Both Druckrey (1056) and Wynder (4300) emphasized that the benzo(a)pyrene concentration of various tobacco and smoke preparations is only sufficient to account for a very small part of the carcinogenicity of these materials [see pp. 144–145 in (3999)]. PAH alone, however, account for only a small portion of the carcinogenicity of tobacco “tar” … The levels of carcinogenic PAH in tobacco smoke are well below their practical threshold as complete mouse skin carcinogens … (see 4005). The contribution of BaP or PAH in general to mouse skin carcinogenesis by cigarette smoke condensate cannot be fully measured at this time. Wynder and Hoffmann [4332] found a correlation between BaP levels and carcinogenicity of smoke condensates from several types of cigarettes. A much larger series of experimental cigarettes was studied in the smoking and health program of the National Cancer Institute. No significant dependence of carcinogenic potency on BaP content was observed [Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), National Cancer Institute (2683)]. [See (4009).]
The carcinogenic activity of the particulate matter of tobacco smoke in epithelial tissues of laboratory animals is greater than the sum of the effects of the known carcinogens present [(see 4010); and the comment in the 1964 Advisory Committee Report to the Surgeon General: “Apparently, therefore, the whole is greater than the sum of the known parts” (3999)].
489
In 1980, Coultson (830) commented on the decades of attention on B[a]P in cigarette MSS and its supposed relevance in cigarette smoke-induced cancers: Whether it’s benzo[a]pyrene or not, nobody really knows. More work has been done on benzo[a]pyrene to prove it to be the causative agent in cigarette smoking than I think on any other chemical for any disease that I know. And yet the point is, you can’t prove it.
The failure of PAHs to explain no more than a few percent of the tumorigenicity of CSC led to the inclusion of the concept of promotion in the overall equation. As noted previously, Wynder and Hoffmann (4313) asserted that the established carcinogenicity of CSC on mouse epidermis could to a great extent be accounted for on the basis of initiating carcinogens, largely PAHs, and promoting substances, a major group of which was the phenols. Their assertion was incorrect in 1961, and it is incorrect today. In his listing of reported identified tobacco smoke components (Table IX.A-2), Kosak (2170) listed published reports on two simple phenols, the early reports on phenol by Wenusch (4202) and Ikeda (1857) and on catechol (1,2-benzenediol) by Kissling (2107) and Wenusch (4202), but he questioned the identification of phenol. Kosak also cited earlier reports by Thoms (3912) and McNally (2524) who mentioned the presence of “phenols” in tobacco smoke and Roffo (3324) who mentioned the presence of phenolic acids. However, it should be remembered that Roffo’s 1939 studies dealt with a destructive distillate from tobacco, not with tobacco smoke generated in a tobacco smoking process simulating that used by human smokers. Table IX.A-3 summarizes 1954 listing by Kosak of phenolic components reported in tobacco smoke, the year of the report, and the investigators involved. However, critical examination of the chronology of the pre-1954 investigations of phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke reveals that Kosak’s 1954 publication suffers from several deficiencies with regard to reports on this class of tobacco smoke components. The examination indicates that his manuscript was submitted to the journal Experientia in September 1953, accepted for publication shortly thereafter, and appeared in a February 1954 issue of the journal. One of the significant omissions was the report by Rayburn and his colleagues at the Research Department of the American Tobacco Company: At the 6th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference (TCRC) in December 1952, Rayburn (3089) described the unequivocal identification of four low molecular weight phenols in the MSSs from a series of cigarettes, each member of the series fabricated from one of the four major tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Maryland, Oriental). The phenols identified were phenol, guaiacol (2-methoxyphenol), o-cresol (2-methylphenol), and m-cresol (3-methylphenol). The next year, these results were published by Rayburn et al. in the journal Analytical Chemistry (3090). In Table IX.A-4 literature references are listed for phenolic components in tobacco smoke cited by Kosak (2170) plus several pertinent references not included in his publication.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 489
11/13/08 5:22:29 PM
490
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-2 Tobacco Smoke Components Listed by Kosak (2170) Class
Component
Class
Component
Class
Component
Hydrocarbons
Hentriacontane (?) Acetylene “Unsaturated hydrocarbons” Azulene Phenanthrene (?) Anthracene (?) Benzopyrene (?) “Condensed aromatics” (?)
Ketones
3-Pentanone 4-Heptanone 17-Tritriacontanone (?) 2,3-Butanedione “Higher” ketones (?)
Acids
Formic acid Acetic acid Butyric acid Valeric acid Caproic acid C7 and C8 aliphatic acids (?) Succinic acid (?) Fumaric acid (?) Citric acid (?) Benzoic acid (?) Phenolic acids (?)
Alcohols and Phenols
Methanol Glycerol Diethylene glycola Ethylene glycola Phenol (?) Catechol (?)
Alkaloids
Nicotine Pyridyl ethyl ketone Myosmine Nicotyrine α-Socratinec β-Socratinec γ-Socratinec Obelinc Lohitamc Anodminc Lathraeinc Poikilinec Gudhamc
Miscellaneous Components
Levoglucosand “Phytosterol” (?) C10H14O (a furan ?) “Resins” (?) “Resin acids” (?)
Aldehydes
Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Butyraldehyde Acrolein (?) Benzaldehyde 2-Furaldehyde (?) b
Other N-containing components
Pyrrole (?) “Pyrroles” (?) “N-Methylpyrrolidines” (?) Pyridine “Picoline” (?) “Lutidine” (?) “Collidine” (?) “Pyridine bases” (?) Methylamine (?) “Chlorophyll degradation products” (?) “Uric acids” (?)
Inorganic Components
Ammonia Carbon monoxide Carbon dioxide Hydrogen cyanide Hydrogen sulfide Thiocyanic acid (?) Oxygen Arsenic e “Acetates” (?) “Chlorides” (?) “Cyanides” (?) “Nitrates” (?)
a b c
d e
In smoke because of transfer of an humectant added to tobacco. The question mark indicates that Kosak did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. Subsequent study demonstrated this component was not a well-defined compound but an artifact, a mixture, or an ammonium salt [see discussion by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971)]. 1,6-Anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose. Probably present as As2O3..
The report of the possible presence of phenol-like compounds in Oriental tobacco by Jones and Latimer (1980) at RJRT R&D eventually prompted a research project to synthesize a series of phenols in an attempt to find one or more that would impart a pleasant leather-like aroma to cigarette smoke (3235a, 3240a). Some twenty phenols were synthesized. However, none was ever used commercially as a tobacco flavorant or in any extensive in-house panel tests, for the following reasons.
During the course of his initial research project (3235a, 3240a) at RJRT R&D, Rodgman suggested the possibility of the conversion of several of the phenols to a quinone during the smoking process. This suggestion, coupled with the reports by Takizawa (3865a) that several simple quinones such as p-benzoquinone (2,5-cyclohexadiene-4-dione), 1,2-naphthoquinone (1,2-naphthalenedione), and 1,4-naphthoquinone (1,4-naphthalenedione) were tumorigenic to mouse skin, raised serious questions about the addition of phenols to the tobacco blend.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 490
11/13/08 5:22:30 PM
491
Phenols and Quinones
OH
Table IX.A-3 Phenolic Components of Tobacco Smoke Listed by Kosak (2170) Year
Investigator
Component
1904 1919 1932 1939 1939 1939 1947
Thoms (3912) Kissling (2107) McNally (2524) Roffo (3324) Wenusch (4202) Wenusch (4202) Ikeda (1857)
“phenols” catechol “phenols” phenolic acids catechol phenol phenol
The biological findings on p-benzoquinone were subsequently confirmed by Tiedemann (3916a). Takizawa (3865a) reported that neither of the higher molecular weight quinones 9,10-anthraquinone (9,10-anthracenedione) or 9,10-phenanthrenequinone (9,10-phenanthrenedione) was tumorigenic to mouse skin. Rodgman also communicated to management the substance of the early reports by Boutwell et al. (414), subsequently amplified by Boutwell and Bosch (414), that when certain low molecular weight phenols were applied to mouse skin in sequence with a level of a tumorigenic PAH such as B[a]P either insufficient to induce tumors or sufficient to induce tumors in only a small percentage of the treated animals the phenols enhanced (or promoted) the tumorigenic effect of the PAH, that is, the percent tumor-bearing animals (% TBA) was much higher than that anticipated on the basis of the PAH dose administered. The effectiveness of the promotion of the tumorigenicity of a tumorigenic PAH by a phenol is dependent on the substituents R2 and R6 on the C2 and C6 carbons, the carbon atoms adjacent to the carbon to which the hydroxyl group is attached (Figure IX.A-1). If R2 = H or R6 = H or if R2 = R6 = H, then the phenol will exert a promoting effect, the effect being greatest when both substituents R2 = R6 = H.
R6
R2
R3
R5 R4
Figure IX.A-1 A substituted phenol.
If neither R2 nor R6 is hydrogen, that is, when R2 ≠ H and R6 ≠ H, no promoting effect is observed. The coupling of the findings reported by Boutwell et al. (414) on the promoting effects of low molecular weight phenols on PAHs in the mouse skin-painting bioassay with the failure to explain the tumorigenicity of CSC on the basis of its PAH content subsequently triggered extensive research both within and outside of the tobacco industry on several aspects of the phenols in tobacco smoke.
1. Identification and quantitation of phenols in cigarette MSS: To date, the number of phenols identified in tobacco smoke exceeds 400 (see Table IX.A-22). While the number of phenols identified is significantly fewer than the number of PAHs identified in cigarette MSS, the number of identified tobacco smoke phenols is much greater than that identified in any other consumer product such as tea, coffee, or cocoa, again a reflection of the intense scrutiny directed at tobacco smoke vs. that directed at any other consumer product. 2. Bioassays to determine contribution of phenols to CSC tumorigenicity: Determination of the biological relationship, if any, between the phenol fraction from cigarette MSS or its individual components and the PAH fraction from cigarette MSS or its individual components needed to be conducted. Was the biological relationship between phenol and
Table IX.A-4 Studies of Phenolic Components of Tobacco Smoke Omitted from the 1954 Listing by Kosak (2170) Year
Investigator
Component
1871 1876 1904 1919 1932 1939 1939 1947 1950 1952 1953 1954
Vohl and Eulenberg (4065) Ludwig (2408) Thoms (3912) Kissling (2107) McNally (2524) Roffo (3324) Wenusch (4202) Ikeda (1857) Molinari (2605) Rayburn (3089) Rayburn et al. (3090) Kosak (2170)
phenol phenol “phenols” 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (catechol) “phenols” phenolic acids phenol, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (catechol) phenol phenol, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (catechol) phenol, 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol), 2-methylphenol (o-cresol), 3-methylphenol (m-cresol) phenol, 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol), 2-methylphenol (o-cresol), 3-methylphenol (m-cresol) list of tobacco smoke components
Note: Entries in bold print refer to items included by Kosak (2170).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 491
11/13/08 5:22:32 PM
492
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
the tumorigenic PAHs one of promotion, cocarcinogenesis, inhibition, or anticarcinogenesis? 3. Determination of the nature of the precursors in tobacco of the phenols in cigarette MSS: The studies in the mid-1960s to identify the major precursors in tobacco of the phenols in tobacco smoke paralleled the studies in the late 1950s and early 1960s on the precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. 4. The effect of cigarette design parameters on delivery of MSS phenols: Determinations of which cigarette design parameters enabled significant control of the levels of phenols in MSS needed to be conducted.
In the following paragraphs, each of the topics listed above is discussed in considerable detail with an attempt to put in perspective the relationships between isolation/identification, precursor definition, bioassay results, and delivery control pertinent to the phenols in cigarette MSS.
IX.A.1 Identification and Quantitation of Phenols in Cigarette MSS In their reviews of phenolic components of tobacco smoke, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) concluded their report on the first successful isolation of phenols from tobacco smoke by Vohl and Eulenberg (4065) and Ludwig (2408) with the comment: “Since that time, publications have dealt sporadically with smoke phenols.” From the early 1950s through 1967, over 110 reports dealing with phenols in smoke were presented at scientific meetings and/or published in peer-reviewed journals. Such a number can hardly be considered as sporadic! Many of the studies in the 1950s dealt with the identification and quantitation of various low molecular weight phenols in cigarette MSS [see the studies on phenol, the methylphenols (the cresols), 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol), the dimethylphenols (the xylenols) by Rayburn (3089), Rayburn et al. (3090), Commins and Lindsey (786–789, 789a), Izawa et al. (1906), and on scopoletin by Yang et al. (4373–4375)]. Not only was a variety of separation techniques employed to obtain the phenols but also a variety of analytical techniques was employed for the quantitation. Examples of these methods follow.
Diazotization with p-nitroaniline, paper chromatography, UV absorption spectrophotometry Methylation, paper chromatography, UV absorption spectrophotometry Formation of 2,4-dinitrobenzoates Formation of phenylazobenzene sulfonic acid derivatives Methylation, gas chromatography Gas chromatography, internal standard addition
Rayburn et al. (3090)
Commins and Lindsey (786)
Izawa et al. (1906) Izawa et al. (1906) Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Hoffmann and Wynder (1789), Crouse et al. (851), Spears (3764)
Gas chromatography 4-Aminoantipyrine treatment, colorimetry Glass capillary gas chromatography Diazotization with p-nitroaniline, colorimetry Thin layer chromatography Derivatization, colorimetry
Oakley et al. (2820) Lorentzen and Neurath (2397) Smith and King (3716) Smith and King (3717, 3718) Smith and Sullivan (3719) Knoop and Rosene (2142a)
In 1959, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) cataloged the sixteen tobacco smoke phenols listed in Table IX.A-5. Examination of the chronology of the published reports on phenols in tobacco smoke reveals the escalation (see Table IX.A-6) of the scientific publications/presentations between 1952 and 1964, the year of the Advisory Committee’s Report on Smoking and Health to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999). This escalation was similar to but not as extensive as the increase from 1953 to 1964 in the number of presentations/publications pertinent to PAH in tobacco smoke. In January 1964, the Advisory Committee on Smoking and Health submitted its report to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999). Because of the widespread dissemination of the contents of this report, its January 1964 publication provides an appropriate point in time to assess the situation with regards to prior research publications on phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke. Table IX.A-6 summarizes chronologically some of the various reports issued between 1952 and 1964 on tobacco smoke phenols. Of the eighty-two reports cited in Table IX.A-6 from 1952 through 1964, eighty were issued from 1955 through 1964. If, because of the early 1964 issuance of the Advisory Committee’s Report, the publications on tobacco smoke phenols in 1964 are omitted from the listing, the number from 1953 through 1963 becomes sixty-five. As noted previously in the discussion of the early studies of PAHs, a similar assessment of publications on PAHs in tobacco smoke indicated that some 213 reports were issued from 1953 through 1964. If the publications on tobacco smoke PAHs in 1964 are omitted, the number from 1953 through 1963 becomes 200. During the first decade of research on tobacco smoke, effort was divided between the identifications of the various phenolic compounds and improvements of their quantitation in cigarette MSS. Less than a decade after the 1959 review by Johnstone and Plimmer, Stedman (3797) tabulated the reports in which the identifications of fifty-four phenols in tobacco smoke were described (Table IX.A-7). In their 1980 review, Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed over 150 phenolic compounds that had been identified as tobacco smoke components. By the mid-1990s, over 270 completely identified phenolic compounds were reported as tobacco smoke components (Table IX.A-22). It should be noted that, despite repeated criticisms of the publication policy of the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company on tobacco smoke composition, seventy of the phenolic compounds listed in Table IX.A-22 were first
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 492
11/13/08 5:22:32 PM
493
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-5 Tobacco Smoke Phenols Cataloged by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) Phenol
References
1,2-Benzenediol {catechol} 1,3-Benzenediol {resorcinol} 1,4-Benzenediol {hydroquinone} 2H-Benzopyran-6-one, 7-hydroxy6-methoxy- {scopoletin} Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxyphenyl){3’-hydroxyacetophenone} Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl){4’-hydroxyacetophenone} 1-Naphthalenol {1-naphthol} 2-Naphthalenol {2-naphthol} Phenol Phenol, 2,4-dimethyl- {2,4-xylenol} Phenol, 3,5-dimethyl- {3,5-xylenol} Phenol, 2-dimethoxy- {guaiacol} Phenol, 2-methyl- {o-cresol} Phenol, 3-methyl- {m-cresol} Phenol, 4-methyl- {p-cresol} Phenol. 2,4,6-trimethyl- {mesitol}
Molinari (2605, 2607), Bonnet and Neukomm (396), Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a) Bonnet and Neukomm (396) Yang et al. (4373-4375) Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a) Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a) Vohl and Eulenberg (4065), Ludwig (2408), Rayburn (3089), Rayburn et al. (3090), Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a), Bonnet and Neukomm (396), Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Wynder and Wright (4354) Carruthers et al. (616), Clemo (765) Rayburn (3089), Rayburn et al. (3090) Rayburn (3089), Rayburn et al. (3090), Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a), Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Rayburn et al. (3089), Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a), Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a), Carruthers and Johnstone (615) Bonnet and Neukomm (396)
Table IX.A-6 Publications/Presentations (1952–1964) Pertinent to Identification of Phenolic Components of Tobacco Smoke Number Year
In Year
Accumulated
Investigator(s)
1952
1
1
Rayburn (3089)
1953
1
2
Rayburn et al. (3090)
1955
1
3
Wright and Wynder (4353)
1956
5
8
Commins and Lindsey (786–789, 789a)
1957
3
11
Bonnet and Neukomm (396), Landahl and Tracewell (2261), Wynder and Wright (4354)
1958
11
22
Bonnet (392), Carruthers et al. (616), Clemo (765), Rowland (3347), Weaving (4156), Wender et al. (4164), Yang et al. (4373–4375)
1959
8
29
Dieterman et al. (969), Doll (1025), Izawa et al. (1906), Onishi (2858), Reid (3096), Rodgman and Cook (3271), Roe et al. (3314)
1960
3
33
Carruthers and Johnstone (615), Rodgman and Cook (3280, 3286), Weaving (4158), Yang et al. (4376)
1961
8
41
Cundiff (859), Herrmann (1625), Hoffmann and Wynder (1789), Latimer (2274), Rodgman and Cook (3286), Wynder and Hoffmann (4311–4313)
1962
7
48
Kato and Shibayama (2044), P. Lorillard Co. R&D (2399), Rodgman and Cook (3286), Schmeltz et al. (3488), Wynder and Hoffmann (4314), Yang and Wender (4377, 4378)
1963
17
65
Crouse et al. (851), Hoffmann et al. (1766), Hoffmann and Wynder (1791), Kato et al. (2045), Laurene (2295, 2295a), Laurene et al. (2311, 2312), Lorentzen and Neurath (2397), Osman et al. (2876), Rodgman and Cook (3286), Rodgman and Mims (3305), Spears (3764, 3765), Unghvary et al. (3995), Wender and Yang (4163), Wynder and Hoffmann (4317)
1964
17
82
Ehmke and Neurath (1115), Elmenhorst (1129), Esterle and Campbell (1164), Knoop and Rosene (2142a), Mann et al. (2451), Oakley et al. (2820), Pyriki and Moldenauer (3043), Rodgman and Cook (3286), Seehofer et al. (3574), Smith and King (3716, 3717)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 493
11/13/08 5:22:33 PM
494
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-7 Tobacco Smoke Phenols Cataloged by Stedman (3797) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23.
24.
25. 26. 27.
Acetic acid, 2-hydroxyphenylAcetic acid, 3-hydroxyphenylAcetic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylBenzaldehyde, 3,4-dihydroxyBenzaldehyde, 3,5-dimethoxy4-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 2-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 3-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 4-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy3-methoxy1,2-Benzenediol 1,3-Benzenediol 1,4-Benzenediol Benzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyBenzoic acid, 3,5-dimethoxy4-hydroxyBenzoic acid, 2-hydroxyBenzoic acid, 3-hydroxyBenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyBenzoic acid, 3-hydroxy4-methoxyBenzoic acid, 4-hydroxy3-methoxy2H-1-Benzopyran-6-one, 6,7dihydroxy2H-1-Benzopyran-6-one, 7-hydroxy6-methoxyCinnamic acid, 3,4-dihydroxyCinnamic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-, 3-ester with 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycy clohexanecarboxylic acid Cinnamic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-, 5-ester with 1,3,4,5tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid Cinnamic acid, 3,5-dimethoxy4-hydroxyCinnamic acid, 4-hydroxyCinnamic acid, 4-hydroxy3-methoxy-
28. 29. 30. 31. 32.
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxyphenyl)Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)1-Naphthalenol 2-Naphthalenol
acetophenone, 2’-hydroxyacetophenone, 3’-hydroxyacetophenone, 4’-hydroxy1-naphthol 2-naphthol
vanillin
33. 34. 35. 36.
Phenol Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxyPhenol, 2,3-dimethylPhenol, 2,4-dimethyl-
2,3-xylenol 2,4-xylenol
catechol resorcinol hydroquinone protocatechuic acid syringic acid
37 . 38. 39. 40. 41.
Phenol, 2,5-dimethylPhenol, 2,6-dimethylPhenol, 3,4-dimethylPhenol, 3,5-dimethylPhenol, 2-ethyl-
salicylic acid
isovanillic acid
42. 43. 44. 45.
Phenol, 3-ethylPhenol, 4-ethylPhenol, 2-methoxyPhenol, 2-methoxy-
vanillic acid
46. Phenol, 4-methoxy-
esculetin
47. Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-
isoeugenol
scopoletin
48. Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-
eugenol
caffeic acid chlorogenic acid
49. Phenol, 2-methyl50. Phenol, 3-methyl-
o-cresol m-cresol
neochlorogenic acid
51. Phenol, 4-methyl-
p-cresol
sinapic acid
52. Phenol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
thymol
coumaric acid ferulic acid
53. Phenol, 2,4,6-trimethyl54. Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxyphenyl-
mesitol
protocatechualdehyde syringaldehyde salicaldehyde
2,5-xylenol 2,6-xylenol 3,4-xylenol 3,5-xylenol
guaiacol
55. Propanoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenyl-
reported as tobacco smoke components by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D personnel and the identities of an additional twenty-five phenolic smoke components reported by others were confirmed. As shown by the citations included in Table IX.A-8, the Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference over the years has been a significant forum for the dissemination of new and meaningful information pertinent to phenolic components in tobacco smoke. While the nature and levels of the low molecular weight phenols in tobacco smoke were being defined in the late 1950s and early 1960s, additional research permitted the identification of several more complex phenolic components of tobacco smoke, for example, the naphthalenols by
Commins and Lindsey (789, 789a), hydroxybenzopyranones such as scopoletin by Yang et al. (4373–4375) and Wender et al. (4164), esculetin by Dietermann et al. (969), α-tocopherol by Rodgman and Cook (3271), hydroxycinnamic acids by Yang and Wender (4376), hydroxyphenylacetic acids by Yang and Wender (4377) and Wender and Yang (4163), and several hydroxybenzaldehydes by Yang and Wender (4379). In contrast to the low molecular weight phenols, many of these more complex phenols are also present at more than trace amounts in tobacco. A series of low molecular weight, volatile phenols were identified in the tobacco type Latakia by Irvine and Saxby (1876, 1877a) at much greater levels than volatile phenols are found in other tobacco types such as fluecured and burley.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 494
11/13/08 5:22:34 PM
495
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-8 Presentations at Tobacco Chemists’ Research (TCRC) and Tobacco Science Research Conferences (TSRC) on Phenolic Components of Tobacco Products TCRC
Investigator(s)
TCRC
Investigator(s)
• Isolation, Identification, Quantitation of Phenols in Tobacco Products 6th 12th 16th 16th 17th 18th 18th 18th 18th 18th 19th 19th 20th 20th 21st 22nd 22nd 23rd 24th 25th 27th 28th 29th 29th 29th 30th 30th 31st 31st 32nd 32nd 32nd 32nd 33rd
Rayburn (3089) Rowland (3347) Davis and George (911a) Schmeltz et al. (3488) Burdick et al. (526) Ayres and Thornton (127) Esterle and Campbell (1164) Knoop and Rosene (2142a) Mann et al. (2451) Rodgman and Cook (3280) Ayres and Thornton (128) Spears et al. (3767) Kallianos et al. (2016) Schlotzhauer et al. (3468) Kallianos et al. (2017) Benner et al. (276) Leach and Alford (2321) Benner et al. (275) Miller et al. (2554) Singer and Hoffmann (3674) Thacker and Martin (3894) Guerin et al. (1450) Newell et al. (2769) Roberts and Watts (3228) Schumacher et al. (3553) Chamberlain et al. (664) Kallianos (2614) Hecht et al. (1561) Schlotzhauer et al. (3474) Cornell et al. (828) Heckman and Best (1587) Snook et al. (3744) Snook et al. (3746) Snook et al. (3751)
34th 34th 35th 36th 36th 37th 39th 40th 42nd 42nd 42nd 43rd 45th 46th 46th 48th 50th 50th 51st 51st 52nd 53rd 54th 55th 55th 56th 56th 57th 57th 58th 58th 58th 58th 59th
Carmella et al. (600) Schlotzhauer et al. (3462) Carmella et al. (598) Lee et al. (2329) Snook and Chortyk (3737) Carmella et al. (599) Adams et al. (30) McWilliams et al. (2526) Nanni et al. (2681a) Risner and Cash (3172) Snook et al. (3754) Risner and Cash (3174) Lee et al. (2330a) Prakasch and Ireland (2983) Risner (3166) Wilson (4268) Green and Rodgman (1373) Risner (3170) Risner and Nelson (3170) Zhangyu et al. (4412) Risner and Cash (3174) Forehand et al. (1213) Wooten et al. (4279) Li et al. (2361) Purkis et al. (3007) Honglin et al. (1825) Reffick et al. (3093) Volgger et al. (4067) Warren (4137) Hwang et al. (1854) Little et al. (2379) Loureau et al. (2400a) Sheng et al. (3646) Hwang et al. (1853a)
• Precursor, Biological, and Other Studies on Phenols in Tobacco Products 19th 19th 22nd 23rd 23rd 23rd 23rd 25th 26th 28th
Chortyk et al. (725a) Spears et al. (3767) Bell et al. (246) Benner et al. (275) Burton et al. (539) Colucci et al. (783b) Lakritz et al. (2253) Rathkamp et al. (3087) Artho et al. (105) Baggett and Morie (156)
Eventually, several hydroxyphenyl alcohols and hydroxybenzyl alcohols were identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke by Hecht et al. (1561). These identifications were soon followed by the identification of a series of phenolic acids from tobacco by Snook et al. (3749, 3751). Table IX.A-5 summarizes the studies on phenols in tobacco smoke up to 1964. In Table IX.A-9, studies on phenols in tobacco smoke from 1964 to date are summarized.
28th 29th 31st 37th 48th 50th 52nd 54th 59th 59th
Hecht et al. (1582) Brunnemann et al. (496) Hardy and Hobbs (1501) Brunnemann et al. (499) Wilson (4268) Hu (1840a) Leffingwell and Alford (2339) Doolittle et al. (1051) Dyakonov et al. (1077a) Hwang et al. (1853a)
IX.A.2 Bioassays to Determine the Contribution of Phenols to Cigarette Smoke Condensate Tumorigenicity At several scientific meetings in the mid-1950s, Boutwell et al. (414) described their preliminary findings on the promoting effect of phenol on the specific tumorigenicity of 7,12dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMB[a]A) when the application
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 495
11/13/08 5:22:36 PM
496
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-9 Reports of Research Pertinent to Phenolic Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke, 1964 to 2005 Year
Investigator(s)
1964
Ehmke and Neurath (1115), Elmenhorst (1129), Esterle and Campbell (1164), Knoop and Rosene (2142a), Mann et al. (2451), Oakley et al. (2820), Pyriki and Moldenauer (3043), Rodgman (3251), Rodgman and Cook (3286), Seehofer et al. (3574), Smith and King (3716, 3717), Smith and Sullivan (3719), Testa et al. (3890), USPHS (3999), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319)
1965
Bock et al. (358), Chortyk et al. (725a), Cuzin et al. (884), Kaburaki et al. (1996, 1997), Kato et al. (2043, 2046), LeRoux (2351), Lipp (2374, 2376, 2377), Rodgman and Cook (3286), SEITA (3602), Smith and King (3718), Spears et al. (3767), Steck and Wender (3792), Steck et al. (3793), Testa et al. (3891), Waltz and Häusermann (4121), Waltz et al. (4123, 4124), Wynder and Hoffmann (4330)
1966
Bell et al. (248), Chortyk et al. (726), Kallianos et al. (2016), Mokhnachev and Latayeva (2577), Mold et al. (2594), Müller and Moldenhauer (2653), Schlotzhauer et al. (3468), Shamberger (3625), Touey and Kiefer (3937), Van Duuren et al. (4037)
1967
Hoffmann and Wynder (1797), Kallianos et al. (2017), Lyerly and Gilleland (2413a), Mokhnachev and Latayeva (2578), Müller and Moldenhauer (2653), Schlotzhauer et al. (3468), Schmeltz et al. (3486), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)
1968
Avetyam et al. (125), Bell et al. (246), Benner et al. (274), Chamberlain and Stedman (666), Colucci and Sizemore (783a), Dalhamn (891a), Hoffmann and Wynder (1798), Irvine and Saxby (1876), Kaburaki et al. (1994, 1995), Kallianos et al. (2016), Leach and Alford (2321), Schmeltz and Schlotzhauer (3497), Stedman (3797), Van Duuren et al. (4036), Wynder and Hoffmann (4342, 4346)
1969
Benner et al. (275, 276), Burton et al. (539), Colucci et al. (783b), Georgiev (1284a), Green et al. (1377, 1378), Grob and Völlmin (1427), Irvine and Saxby (1877a), Lakritz et al. (2253), Leach et al. (2322), Wynder and Hoffmann (4344, 4346)
1970
Green et al. (1377), Grob and Völlmin (1426), Kaburaki et al. (2006), Kushnir et al. (2245), Laurene et al. (2306), Martin and Thacker (2478), Miller et al. (2554), Reynolds (3111), Testa (3884), Viart (4050), Wynder and Hoffmann (4346a)
1971
Green and Schumacher (1375), Hoffmann and Wynder (1800), Kaburaki et al. (2005), Miller et al. (2554), Rathkamp et al. (3087), Royal College of Physicians (3363), Shigematsu et al. (3650), Singer and Hoffmann (3674), Van Duuren et al. (4035)
1972
Artho et al. (105), Bock (352), Elmenhorst (1132), Hoffmann and Wynder (1802, 1803), Klimisch and Reese (2125), Schmeltz et al. (3499), Schumacher et al. (3557), USPHS (4003)
1973
Baggett and Morie (155), Benner et al. (278), Derreux et al. (952), Diffee (970), Morie and Sloan (2635), Rathkamp et al. (3088), Thacker and Martin (3894), Van Duuren et al. (4029)
1974
Akin and Chamberlain (39a), Baggett and Morie (156), Green and Best (1356), Guerin et al. (1449), Hecht et al. (1582), Heckman (1586), Klus and Kuhn (2137), Lloyd and Miller (2387, 2388), Newell et al. (2767), Schmeltz et al. (3484), Schumacher et al. (3553)
1975
Baggett and Morie (156), Brunnemann et al. (496), Hecht et al. (1583), Malaterre et al. (2447), Newell et al. (2769, 2777), Roberts and Watts (3228), Schmeltz et al. (3484), Schumacher et al. (3553)
1976
Best et al. (312), Brunnemann et al. (497), Chamberlain et al. (664), Green et al. (1375b), Hoffmann et al. (1780), Ishiguro et al. (1878a, 1879, 1886), Kallianos (2014), Kensler (2082), Mauldin (2506), Miller et al. (2543), Moates (2570), Newell et al. (2761, 2762, 2765, 2766), Patterson et al. (2904), Sakuma et al. (3395), Testa and Hys (3892), Van Duuren and Goldschmidt (4028)
1977
Brunnemann et al. (514), Hardy and Hobbs (1501), Harrell (1530), Hecht et al. (1561), Schlotzhauer et al. (3474), Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), Schmeltz et al. (3512), Schumacher et al. (3553), Walters (4113)
1978
Chamberlain et al. (663), Cornell et al. (828), Green et al. (1371), Hecht et al. (1561), Heckman and Best (1587), Ishiguro and Sugawara (1881–1883), Newell et al. (2769), Schlotzhauer (3447), Schlotzhauer et al. (3474), Snook et al. (3744, 3746, 3753), Van Duuren et al. (4038)
1979
Chamberlain et al. (652), Green et al. (1367), Schmeltz et al. (3512), Snook and Fortson (3745), Snook et al. (3751), USPHS (4005)
1980
Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884), Martin and Gilleland (2476), Mokhnachev and Mironenko (2579), Sakuma et al. (3402), Schlotzhauer et al. (3452), Snook et al. (3747), Van Duuren (4026), Wattenberg et al. (4149c)
1981
Hecht et al. (1562), Heckman and Best (1587), Morée-Testa (2615), Schlotzhauer and Chortyk (3453), Shelar and Colby (3641–3643), Snook et al. (3748, 3749), USPHS (4009)
1982
Hwang et al. (1854a), Sakuma et al. (3400), Schlotzhauer et al. (3462), Snook and Chortyk (3737, 3738), USPHS (4010)
1983
Brunnemann et al. (499), Hoffmann et al. (1736), Yoshida and Fukuhara (4386)
1984
Adams et al. (28), Jeanty et al. (1926)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 496
11/13/08 5:22:37 PM
497
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-9 (Continued) Reports of Research Pertinent to Phenolic Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke, 1964 to 2005 Year
Investigator(s)
1985
Adams et al. (30), Eaker and Hutcherson (1091), Eble et al. (1105), Sakuma et al. (3392), Snook et al. (3743)
1986
Grimmer et al. (1409), IARC (1871), LaVoie et al. (2314a, 2314b), McWilliams et al. (2526), Risner (3159)
1987
Adams et al. (31), Grimmer et al. (1409), Melikian et al. (2527f)
1988
Nanni et al. (2681), Risner (3161), Risner and Cash (3171, 3172)
1989
Melikian et al. (2527c, 2527d), Risner and Cash (3173, 3174), Schmidt and Hecker (3519a), Snook et al. (3754)
1990
Martin et al. (2480), Melikian et al. (2527g), Nanni et al. (2681), Risner and Cash (3173)
1991
Risner (3165)
1992
Prakash and Ireland (2983), Risner (3166), Zhao and Zhou (4414)
1994
Risner et al. (3168), Wilson (4268)
1996
Green and Rodgman (1373), Hu (1840a), Risner (3170)
1997
Borgerding et al. (420), Risner and Nelson (1970), Zhangyu et al. (4412)
1998
Hecht et al. (1572), Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741), Leffingwell (2339), Nelson et al. (2691)
1999
Baker (172), Forehand et al. (1213), Hirose et al. (1656a), Leffingwell (2338), Omori et al. (2857),
2000
Fowles et al. (1217), Hajaligol and Fisher (1485), Wooten et al. (4279)
2001
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743), Li et al. (2361), Wooten et al. (4277)
2002
Carmines (603), Lauterbach (2313a), Reddick et al. (3093), Smith et al. (3712)
2003
Chen and Moldoveanu (688), Dagnon and Edreva (890), Volgger et al. (4067), Warren (4137)
2004
Gregg et al. (1386), Hwang et al. (1854), Little et al. (2379), Loureau et al. (2400a), Zha and Moldoveanu (4407)
2005
Little et al. (2379a), Uchii and Sato (3990a)
2006
Larkins (2262a)
of the PAH to mouse skin was followed by an application of phenol. Subsequently, Boutwell and Bosch (414) reported that phenol and many substituted phenols enhanced or promoted the specific tumorigenicity of PAHs. However, they reported that 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) exhibited no tumorpromoting activity. Later, 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) was found to be the most plentiful low molecular weight phenol in cigarette MSS [Kallianos et al. (2016), Schlotzhauer et al. (3462), Schlotzhauer and Chortyk (3453), Morée-Testa (2615), Risner and Cash (3171–3174), Risner (3165),] and was reported [Van Duuren et al. (4029)] to be a cocarcinogen for PAHs, not a promoter. Coincident with the phenol studies of Boutwell et al. (414) and during the time that much effort was being expended to resolve the question about the presence of PAHs in tobacco smoke, Gwynn and Salaman (1463b) reported the promoting effect of CSC. Two years later, Gellhorn (1281) reported that whole CSC acted as a promoting agent for several tumorigenic PAHs applied to mouse skin.
The next year, Roe et al. (3314) reported that the phenolic fraction from CSC exerted a significant promoting effect on the specific tumorigenicity of PAHs. They theorized: Cigarette smoke condensate may be richer in tumour-promoting substances than in tumour-initiating substances. Phenolic compounds may be responsible for much of its promoting activity.
As noted previously, Wynder and Hoffmann (4307), unable to explain the bioassay (skin painting) results with CSC on the basis of either its B[a]P content (less than 2% tumor-bearing animals explainable) or its total tumorigenic PAH content (less than 3% tumor-bearing animals explainable), added the concept of promotion, particularly that attributed to low molecular weight phenols, in an attempt (unsuccessful) to explain the bioassay results in laboratory animals. They amplified their theory in a more detailed publication (4307). They also stated (4308) that the higher molecular weight PAHs played an important role in the carcinogenicity to mouse skin of CSC but when the various known concentrations of the carcinogenic PAHs as
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 497
11/13/08 5:22:37 PM
498
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
estimated in CSC were summed, it was obvious that these smoke components acting either individually or in concert could not account for the established carcinogenicity to mouse skin of the CSC nor of its isolated PAH fraction. Because of the inability to explain the mouse skin-painting bioassay results with CSC on the basis of its PAH content and because of the presumed biological relationship between the phenol fraction and/or its individual components and the PAH fraction and/or its individual components, the findings reported by Boutwell et al. (414), Gwynn and Salaman (1463b), Gellhorn (1281), and Roe et al. (3314) stimulated extensive research on the nature and levels of the phenols in cigarette MSS in the late 1950s to early 1960s. Over the next few years, the results from different laboratories of the bioassays involving tobacco smoke phenols varied considerably. The variations raised the question as to whether the relationship between the tobacco smoke phenols and PAHs was one of promotion, cocarcinogenesis, inhibition, or anticarcinogenesis. From the results of their studies on the administration of B[a]P plus phenol and the administration of DMB[a]A plus phenol, Wynder and Hoffmann (4313) concluded: [Our results] show that promoting substances present in tobacco smoke can increase and accelerate the tumor yield of
carcinogenic polynuclear hydrocarbons that by themselves are not present in sufficient concentration to yield any tumors or yield them only after a prolonged latent period.
In 1958, Wynder et al. (4355) proposed the use of the level of B[a]P in CSC as an “indicator” or “marker” of the specific tumorigenicity (mouse skin) of CSC as well as an “indicator” or “marker” of its levels of tumorigenic PAHs with four or more rings. When the low molecular weight phenols in tobacco smoke attracted considerable attention because of their claimed contribution to the specific tumorigenicity of CSC, Hoffmann et al. (1766) and Wynder and Hoffmann (4317) extended the “indicator” concept to phenol, designating it as an “indicator” or “marker” for the promoting low molecular weight volatile phenols in cigarette MSS. Just as the concept of B[a]P as an “indicator” or “marker” of CSC specific tumorigenicity and tumorigenic higher PAHs content was subsequently shown to be incorrect, so was the concept of phenol as an “indicator” or “marker” of phenols-induced promoting activity of CSC and promoting phenols content shown to be incorrect. The phenol “indicator” situation is discussed below. Table IX.A-10 summarizes some of the diversity observed in the bioassay results on the properties pertinent to the tumorigenicity of PAHs of several phenol components of tobacco
Table IX.A-10 Variation in Bioassay Results with Phenols or Phenol-Containing Materials Effect on Specific Tumorigenicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Phenol
Promotion
CSC
yes: Gwynn and Salaman, (1463b), Gellhorn (1281) yes: Roe et al. (3314)
a
Phenolic fraction from CSC a
Phenols Phenol
1,2-Benzenediol {catechol}
1H-1-Benzopyran-6-ol, 3,4dihydro-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-2(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl){α-tocopherol}
a
yes: Boutwell et al. (414) yes: Wynder and Hoffmann, (4313, 4317), Hoffmann and Wynder (1791), Hoffmann et al. (1736) no: Van Duuren and Goldschmitt (4028)
Cocarcinogenicity
Inhibition or Anticarcinogenesis
no: Van Duuren et al. (4029)
yes: Van Duuren et al. (4029, 4035)
yes: Van Duuren et al. (4029), Van Duuren and Goldschmitt (4028), Hecht et al. (1562), Hoffmann et al. (1736)
yes: Shamberger (3625), Slaga and Bracken (3684), Viaje et al. (4049a), Shklar (3655a), Weerapradist and Shklar (4159a), Toth and Patil (3927a), Mirvish (2559b)
CSC = cigarette smoke condensate
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 498
11/13/08 5:22:38 PM
Phenols and Quinones
smoke (phenol, catechol, and α-tocopherol), the phenolic fraction from CSC, and CSC itself. Although much attention and effort were devoted to the supposed deleterious effects of various tobacco smoke components such as the PAHs, the aza-arenes, and the low molecular weight phenols, very little was reported about the tobacco smoke components with properties that offset the supposed tumorigenicity or promoting effects of the compound classes mentioned. One of the first examples of cigarette MSS components inhibiting the action of a “tumorigen” was described by Wynder and Hoffmann (4311). This finding was an outgrowth of their studies on the effect of organic solvent extraction of tobacco on the PAH content of the extracted tobacco smoke. Lam (2255) and Wynder (4294) in the mid-1950s proposed that the precursors in tobacco of PAHs in cigarette MSS were the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons; Wright (4282a) and Wynder et al. (4355, 4356) proposed the phytosterols as the PAH precursors, and Wright (4282) also proposed the terpenoid compounds as major PAH precursors. These compounds are removable almost totally or to a substantial degree by extraction of tobacco with organic solvents such as hexane or pentane. Cigarettes fabricated from the extracted tobacco yielded lower quantities in MSS of PAHs such as B[a]P that were known under certain laboratory conditions to produce tumors on the shaved backs of susceptible strains of mice. Skin-painting studies with mainstream CSC collected by smoking cigarettes made with the control and extracted tobaccos gave a lower percentage of TBA in the extracted tobacco CSC group. However, the decrease in % TBA was much less than the percent decrease in the level in the CSC of tumorigenic PAHs such as B[a]P (4282, 4294, 4307, 4355, 4356). One explanation for this difference was that the solvent extraction removed nearly all the aliphatic saturated hydrocarbons from the tobacco and, thus, they were either absent from the MSS from the extracted-tobacco cigarettes or present at extremely low levels. Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 330– 331 in (4319) and pp. 370–371 in (4332)] reported that this aliphatic saturated hydrocarbon fraction (constituting about 3% of the mainstream CSC) inhibited the activity of tumorigenic PAHs, including B[a]P. The components in the aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction ranged from pentadecane (C15) to pentatriacontane (C35). Each hydrocarbon was present as the normal, iso, and anteiso isomers. The C27 to C33 hydrocarbons constituted about 80% of the saturated hydrocarbon fraction; with C31 (n-hentriacontane) and C33 (n-tritriacontane) hydrocarbons usually being the most plentiful components in the fraction. Subsequent study with improved analytical methodology demonstrated the presence of trace amounts of additional isomeric aliphatic saturated hydrocarbons with as many as forty carbons. Studies with B[a]P and the C31 and C35 saturated hydrocarbons (SHC), where the SHC:B[a]P ratio was 200:1 and 100:1, showed that both saturated hydrocarbons exerted a significant inhibiting effect at both levels on the specific tumorigenicity of B[a]P in mouse skin-painting experiments [4311, 4314, see also pp. 330–331 in (4319) and pp. 370–371 in (4332)].
499
When the saturated hydrocarbon content (normally about 3% of the particulate phase) of mainstream CSC was increased from 3% to 4% (an overall 33% increase) by addition of the saturated hydrocarbon fraction isolated from CSC, the specific tumorigenicity of the CSC decreased, the % TBA decreased from 40% to 24%. The MSS of a cigarette delivering 20 mg of CSC contains about 0.6 mg (600,000 ng) of this saturated hydrocarbon fraction and 10 ng of B[a]P, an SHC: B[a]P ratio of 60,000:1, far in excess of the 200:1 or 100:1 SHC: B[a]P ratio that produced the significant inhibition of the specific tumorigenicity of B[a]P reported in the mouse skin-painting bioassay (4314, 4319, 4332). Other MSS components may have also influenced the PAH and mouse skin-painting results obtained with control tobacco CSC vs. the CSC from organic solvent-extracted tobacco. The extraction of tobacco with a solvent such as hexane not only removed the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon inhibitors from the tobacco, thus making impossible their transfer to MSS when such tobacco is smoked, but also removed other components such as β-sitosterol (4356), α-tocopherol (vitamin E) (3271, 3347), indole (3279), and α- and β-4,8,13-duvane-1,3diol (3221, 3361, 3389), thus preventing their transfer to MSS during the smoking process. Subsequently, these tobacco components, now known to transfer from the tobacco rod to MSS during the smoking process and presumably to sidestream smoke (SSS) during cigarette smolder, have been shown to behave as anticarcinogens for several of the reported tobacco smoke “tumorigens,” such as the PAHs, the N-nitrosamines, and ethyl carbamate. Neither the presence of several of these tobacco and MSS components nor their anticarcinogenic or inhibitory activity vs. known tumorigens was known in the late 1950s or early 1960s. Despite the emphasis on the contribution of CSC components to its specific tumorigenicity when administered to laboratory animals via skin painting, the inhibition of tumorigenesis by CSC and several of its components was not completely ignored during the 1960s. In addition to the role of saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons in the inhibition of the specific tumorigenicity of CSC reported by Wynder and Hoffmann [4311, 4314, see also pp. 330–331 in (4319) and pp. 370–371 in (4332)], other studies pertinent to the antitumorigenicity of tobacco smoke included an earlier one in 1958 by Hoffman and Griffin (1672a) plus later ones in the mid-1960s by Homburger and his colleagues (1823, 1823b, 1824) as well as one reported in the late 1970s by Chamberlain et al. (663) at the USDA. Comparison of the list of the 5200 or so identified components in tobacco smoke with extensive lists presented by Fay et al. (1177a) and Slaga and DiGiovanni (3685) of compounds and elements reported to possess inhibitory or anticarcinogenic action in carcinogenesis-type experiments in laboratory animals reveals not only that tobacco smoke contains numerous anticarcinogens but also that the levels in tobacco smoke of many of them far exceed those of the levels of the reported tobacco smoke “tumorigens” (3255a). The levels of many of the anticarcinogens in tobacco smoke vs. those of the reported smoke “tumorigens” are far in excess of the ratio needed for the anticarcinogenicity to be effective. Table IX.A-11, adapted
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 499
11/13/08 5:22:39 PM
500
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-11 Inhibitors and Anticarcinogens in Tobacco Smoke Tobacco Smoke Component Class (examples)
Tumorigen Suppressed
Hydrocarbons, saturated (e.g., C31H64, C35H72) Hydrocarbons, unsaturated (D-limonene) Hydrocarbons, monocyclic aromatic (benzene) Hydrocarbons, aromatic, polycyclic (naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benzo[e]pyrene, benzo[b]triphenylene) Lactones (coumarin, α-angelica lactone) Alcohols (ethanol, n-butanol, tert-butanol, cholesterol, β-sitosterol, α- and β-4,8,13-duvane-1,3-diol Purines (caffeine, theobromine) Indoles (indole, indole-3-acetonitrile) Miscellaneous components (maleic anhydride, aconitic acid, selenium, carbon disulfide) Phenols (phenol, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, gallic acid; 2-hydroxycinnamic acid; 4-methoxyphenol; α-tocopherol) (see Table IX.A-9)
B[a]P NNKa, dibenzo[a,i]pyrene B[a]P, DB[a,h]A B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, DMB[a]A
a b
B[a]P, DMB[a]A NNNb, DMB[a]A ethyl carbamate, N-nitrosamines, DMB[a]A B[a]P B[a]P, DMB[a]A, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine B[a]P, N-nitrosamines, 1,2-dimethylhydrazine, DMB[a]A, 1,2-dihydro3-methylbenz[e]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene)
NNK = 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone NNN = N’-nitrosonornicotine
from Rodgman (3255a), lists tobacco smoke components reported to be inhibitory or anticarcinogenic to several of the “tumorigens” reported to be present in tobacco smoke. Hoffmann et al. (1766) reported that the results from their study of the levels of several selected components in the MSSs from different tobacco products gave suggestive support to the hypothesis that B[a]P and phenol may serve as “indicators” of the specific tumorigenic activities (initiation, promotion) of tobacco “tars.” During the next decade, the hypothesis that phenol was an “indicator” of the low molecular weight, promoting phenols was reiterated numerous times by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4330, 4332, 4342, 4344, 4346, 4346a). However, as research on the biological effects of phenols in tobacco smoke escalated, it became obvious that the promoting effect of the low molecular weight phenols on the specific tumorigenicity of PAHs in tobacco smoke was not as definitive as Wynder and Hoffmann and other investigators asserted. The discovery that a large percentage of the volatile phenols are removed from MSS by the plasticized filter tip led to differences of opinion on the promoting action of the volatile phenols. Numerous statements in Hoffmann-Wynder presentations and publications described their conclusions with respect to volatile phenols removal vs. tumorigenicity of the phenolsdepleted CSC. Examples of their statements follow. In their 1967 book, Wynder and Hoffmann [(4340), see p. 626 in (4332)] stated: It should be noted, however, that a reduction of phenols in tobacco smoke condensate has not led to a concomitant reduction of tumorigenicity in the corresponding “tars.”
In 1968, Wynder and Hoffmann (4342) again discussed phenols as promoters:
Volatile phenols represent one type of tumor promoter in tobacco smoke. In mouse-skin carcinogenesis, however, they evidently do not play an essential role as such, since a significant reduction of phenols in the smoke condensate is not accompanied by a similar reduction in carcinogenic activity of the “tar” [4332].
A year later, Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 298 in (4344)] wrote: The only known group of promoters in tobacco smoke are the volatile phenols. Their reduction of up to 80% by selective filtration, however, did not lead to a reduction of tumor promoting activity.
In the same article, they added [p. 299 in (4344)]: A reduction of phenol in tobacco smoke through the use of filters, however, does not alter the complete tumorigenic activity of “tar” obtained from such cigarettes. This infers that a selected reduction of volatile phenols will not reduce the tumor-promoting activity of such “tar.”
In the written introduction to their presentation at the 28th TCRC in 1974, Hecht et al. (1582) stated the following and cited Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) as their source: Phenol and some substituted phenols are weak promoters, but they alone contribute only a small part of the promoting activity, since selective filtration of phenol does not change significantly the biological activity of the resulting condensate.
In their discussion of tumor promoters and the complexity of CSC, Van Duuren et al. (4035) reported: Phenol, which is a weak tumor-promoting agent, is indeed an inhibitor of tumorigenesis when applied simultaneously with benzo[a]pyrene.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 500
11/13/08 5:22:40 PM
501
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-12 Tobacco Smoke Phenols with Anticarcinogenic or Antipromoting Properties Phenolic Smoke Component
Reference to Identification in Tobacco Smoke
Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy- {gallic acid} 1H-1-Benzopyran-6-ol, 3,4-dihydro-2,5,7,8tetramethyl-2-(4,8,12trimethyltridecyl)- {α-tocopherol}
Kröller (2195) Rodgman and Cook (3271, 3286), Rodgman (3251)
Phenol
Vohl and Eulenberg (4065), Ludwig (2408), Ikeda (1857) Spears (3764) Yang et al. (4376), Yang and Wender (4377), Wender and Yang (4163) Yang et al. (4376), Yang and Wender (4377), Wender and Yang (4163) Yang and Wender (4377)
Phenol, 4-methoxy2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-, cis-{cis-caffeic acid} 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-, trans-{trans-caffeic acid} 2-Propenoic acid, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-, trans- {ferulic acid}
Van Duuren et al. also noted that rutin, a tobacco component, also inhibited B[a]P carcinogenesis in the mouse skin-painting bioassay. From the results of their biological experiments on cocarcinogenesis (simultaneous and repeated application of an agent, in this case 1,2-benzenediol [catechol]), with B[a]P, Van Duuren et al. (4029) deduced that 1,2benzenediol (catechol) showed remarkable cocarcinogenic activity with B[a]P. They reported: Phenol has been regarded as an important “tumor promoter” in cigarette smoke condensate … [but our] work indicates it is inactive in cocarcinogenesis and, indeed, has a slightly inhibitory effect on benzo[a]pyrene carcinogenesis.
Later, Van Duuren and Goldschmidt (4028) demonstrated the cocarcinogenicity of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) when applied as a 2% solution to mouse skin three times weekly with a solution of 0.005% B[a]P. They contrasted the remarkable cocarcinogenic activity of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) with its inactivity as a tumor promoter for B[a]P. Hecht et al. (1562) described the importance of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) as a tobacco smoke cocarcinogen. They also noted that the levels of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in MSS was reduced by prior extraction of the tobacco with hexane-ethanol or by inclusion of reconstituted tobacco sheet (RTS) in the tobacco blend. While Wynder and Hoffmann wrote at length about the promoting effect of low molecular weight phenols and the phenol fraction of CSC on PAH tumorigenicity, it is interesting to note their change in emphasis in 1986. In a 1986 article (1808), the Hoffmann-Wynder discussion dealt primarily with the nature of tumor initiators (PAHs) and cocarcinogens (catechols), with no mention of the phenolic promoters they had discussed repeatedly for more than two decades since the
Reference to Anticarcinogenesis (AC) or Antipromotion (AP) (AC) Mirvish et al. (2559c) (AC) Shamberger (3625), Slaga and Bracken (3684), Viaje et al. (4049a), Shklar (3655a), Weerapradist and Shklar (4159a), Toth and Patil (3927a), Mirvish (2559b) (AP) Van Duuren et al. (4035) (AC) Wattenberg et al. (4149c) (AC) Wattenberg et al. (4149c), Wattenberg (4149b) (AC) Wattenberg et al. (4149c), Wattenberg (4149b) (AC) Wattenberg (4149b)
early 1960s! In that same year, the IARC published its monograph on tobacco smoking to which Wynder and Hoffmann had contributed substantial information on tobacco smoke chemistry. In its monograph, IARC defined the phenols as a major group of promoting agents in tobacco smoke (1870), but IARC made no mention of the Wynder-Hoffmann observation of a lack of effect on specific tumorigenicity of the almost complete removal of the phenols from MSS. Although much was written during the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s about the supposed adverse effect, that is, the promoting effect of phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke on its specific tumorigenicity in laboratory animals, significant properties, for example, their anticarcinogenicity and/or antipromoting effects, of several specific tobacco smoke phenols have generally been overlooked. Phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke known to possess either of these properties are listed in Table IX.A-12. In addition to the known antitumorigenic and antipromoting effects of CSC and several specific components in it, it has also been shown by Lee et al. (2327a, 2327b, 2337c) that cigarette MSS possesses antimutagenic properties that offset the mutagenicity in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium) of several N-nitrosamines and several of the N-heterocyclic amines defined as “cooked food” mutagens.
IX.A.3 Determination of the Nature of the Precursors in Tobacco of the Phenols in Mainstream Smoke Resolution of the question of the presence of tetracyclic and higher PAHs, particularly B[a]P, in tobacco smoke was followed chronologically by studies to determine the source of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. When the PAH-containing
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 501
11/13/08 5:22:40 PM
502
environmental pollutants from lighting sources (matches, hydrocarbon-fueled cigarette lighters, etc.) were discarded in the early 1950s as significant contributors to the PAHs in tobacco smoke, particularly cigarette MSS, the contribution of tobacco itself to the PAHs in smoke was questioned: What were the components in tobacco that, during the smoking process, could act as significant precursors of the PAHs in its smoke? The investigation sequence was essentially the same with the reported tumorigenic aza-arenes in tobacco smoke. Initially, the identifications of the azaarenes were resolved. Subsequently, studies were conducted to define the precursors in tobacco of the aza-arenes identified in tobacco smoke. As noted previously, however (see Table IX.A-1 and accompanying text), the results reported on numerous studies between 1963 and 1992 have raised other serious questions concerning the presence of the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in tobacco smoke and their supposed generation from nicotine. The difference in the levels of simple phenols in tobacco smoke vs. their levels in the major tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Maryland tobaccos), which collectively constitute the major proportion of American cigarette tobacco blends, suggested that the simple phenols in cigarette MSS were present not as a result of their significant direct transfer per se from the tobacco but as a result of their pyrosynthesis from precursors comprising one or more tobacco components. Long before the concern expressed that the simple phenols possessed promoting activity that enhanced the tumorigenicity of tumorigenic PAHs (414) and the concern expressed by Roe et al. (3314) and Wynder and Hoffmann (4307) about the presence of the simple phenols in tobacco smoke, Wenusch (4202) had suggested that the major sources in tobacco of the tobacco smoke phenols were its lignin and complex carbohydrate and polyphenol components. In contrast to flue-cured, burley, and Maryland tobaccos, highly aromatic tobaccos such as Latakia were reported to contain significant levels of free simple phenols (1876, 1877a). As the complexity of the phenols increased, the likelihood of their presence in tobacco increased and many were found in smoke as a result of direct transfer, for example, the high molecular weight phenol, 3,4-dihydro-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-1H-1-benzopyran-6-ol (α-tocopherol), first identified as a tobacco leaf component by Rowland (3347) and as a tobacco smoke component by Rodgman and Cook (3271), 6,7-dihydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-6-one (esculetin) identified in tobacco and its smoke by Dieterman et al. (969). In the early 1960s, Herrmann (1625, 1626) reviewed various studies on the phenols, phenolic acids, and related compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Examination of the chronology of the investigation of phenolic components of tobacco smoke reveals an interesting situation. In the early 1960s, substantial research was
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
conducted on the phenols in tobacco smoke, their identification, their quantitation, and their major precursors in tobacco. When the promoting effect of the low molecular weight monohydric phenols was seriously questioned, the effort on phenols waned for some years but accelerated again when the claims on the co-carcinogenicity of the dihydric phenols, particularly 1,2-benzenediol (catechol), surfaced. This situation triggered examination of the levels of the benzenediols in tobacco smoke and their possible precursors in tobacco. Table IX.A-13 summarizes some of the studies conducted to define the nature of the major precursors in tobacco of the phenolic components of tobacco smoke. Zane and Wender (4403) described their pyrolysis (pyrolysis temperature that of a Bunsen burner flame) of the tobacco components rutin, quercitin, and chlorogenic acid. In addition to nonphenolic compounds, each pyrolysate was reported to contain 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) with lesser amounts of 4-methyl-1,2-benzenediol, 1,3-benzenediol (resorcinol). The amounts of phenol and 4-methylphenol (p-cresol) in the pyrolysates obtained under various conditions from several major tobacco components (cellulose, pectin, and lignin), a tobacco additive (invert sugar), several individual tobacco types (flue-cured tobacco, cased burley tobacco, Maryland tobacco), and a tobacco substitute (spinach) were reported by Rodgman and Mims (3305) and Rodgman and Cook (3286). Table IX.A-14 summarizes the results. Spears et al. (3767) and Bell et al. (248) determined the generation of phenol when flue-cured and burley tobaccos and various tobacco components (glucose, sucrose, starch, cellulose, and pectin) were pyrolyzed at various temperatures in an air or nitrogen atmosphere. In each instance, phenol was generated. In their study of tobacco lignin as a phenols precursor, Kato et al. (2043) examined the residue resulting from heating tobacco stalk lignin at 450 to 500°C for two hours. They identified the following phenols: phenol, 2-methoxyphenol (guaiacol), 2-methylphenol (o-cresol), 3-methylphenol (m-cresol), 4-methylphenol (p-cresol). Kato et al. (2046) also conducted a comparative thermal analysis of tobacco stalk-derived cellulose, holocellulose, and lignin subjected to similar heating. In a continuation of the pyrolysis study by Chortyk et al. (725a, 726) on the possible contribution of the tobacco pigment to the PAH content of tobacco smoke composition, Schlotzhauer et al. (3468) examined the pyrogenesis of phenols from high molecular weight components of tobacco, specifically the tobacco pigment and the biopolymers lignin, cellulose, and pectin. They (3468) reported that the phenol amounts (phenol, 3- and 4-methylphenol [m- and p-cresol]) found in the pyrolysates from Oriental tobacco and the high molecular weight tobacco components (pigment, lignin, pectin, and cellulose) pyrolyzed at 700°C/nitrogen atmosphere were generated in the following sequence: Oriental tobacco > pigment > lignin ≥ pectin >> cellulose
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 502
11/13/08 5:22:41 PM
503
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-13 Precursors in Tobacco of Phenols in Tobacco Smoke Tobacco Smoke Phenol
Phenol Methylphenols {cresols}
Dimethylphenols {xylenols} Benzenediols {catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone}
Tobacco Leaf Precursor
References
lignin
Rodgman and Mims (3305), Kato et al. (2043, 2046), Schlotzhauer et al. (3456, 3462, 3468), Higman et al. (1647), Carmella et al. (598)
sugars
Spears et al. (3767), Bell et al. (248), Higman et al. (1647), Carmella et al. (598, 602), Schlotzhauer et al. (3462)
polysaccharides (cellulose, starch, pectin)
Kato et al. (2043, 2046), Spears et al. (3767), Bell et al. (248), Schlotzhauer et al. (3456, 3462, 3468), Higman et al. (1647), Brunnemann et al. (496, 497), 1975, 1976, Carmella et al. (598, 601, 602)
protein
Higman et al. (1647)
amino acids
Higman et al. (1647)
extracted tobacco
Rodgman and Cook (3277), Rodgman and Mims (3305), Severson et al. (3616), Carmella et al. (600), Schlotzhauer et al. (3453, 3462)
tobacco pigment
Schlotzhauer et al. (3468)
tobacco extracts
Schlotzhauer et al. (3456), Severson et al. (3616)
rutin
Zane and Wender (4403), Spears et al. (3767), Bell et al. (248), Brunnemann et al. (496, 497), Carmella et al. (598), Schlotzhauer et al. (3462)
quinic acid a chlorogenic acid
Ayres and Thornton (127a) Zane and Wender (4403), Brunnemann et al. (496, 497), Carmella et al. (598, 600, 602), Schlotzhauer et al. (3462)
a
Quinic acid = 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid
b
Chlorogenic acid = 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoic acid, 3-ester with 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid
In a study of the effect of steady-state pyrolysis of tobacco vs. pulsed pyrolysis simulating the puffing sequence in a smoked cigarette, Patterson et al. (2904) reported that the pulsed pyrolysis procedure gave much higher levels of the low molecular weight phenols (phenol, 2-, 3-, and 4-methylphenol [o-, m-,and
p-cresol], 2-, 3-, and 4-ethylphenol, 2,4-, and 2,5-dimethylphenol [2,4- and 2,5-xylenol], and 2-methoxyphenol [guaiacol]) in the pyrolysate than did the steady-state pyrolysis. The report of the significant cocarcinogenicity of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) by Van Duuren and Goldschmidt (4028)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 503
11/13/08 5:22:42 PM
504
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-14 Pyrolysis of Tobacco, Tobacco Components, and Spinach: Phenol Content of Pyrolysate Phenol, µg/g Pyrolyzed Material Pyrolyzed
Atmosphere
T°C
Phenol
4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol)
Individual Component Cellulose Cellulose Pectin Lignin Lignin Invert sugar
nitrogen nitrogen nitrogen nitrogen air nitrogen
550 650 550 550 550 550
460 350 310 2370 440 140
215 110 130 2330 460 50
Tobaccos and Spinach Flue-cured Burley, cased Maryland Spinach
nitrogen nitrogen nitrogen nitrogen
550 550 550 550
730 620 470 360
310 390 150 280
and the subsequent confirmation of its cocarcinogenicity by Hecht et al. (1562) triggered considerable interest in the source in tobacco of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke. In the early 1980s, Schlotzhauer et al. (3462) and Schlotzhauer and Chortyk (3453) at the USDA, in their study of the precursors in tobacco of phenols in tobacco smoke, investigated the pyrolysis of various solvent-extracted fractions from tobacco plus the tobacco residue after extraction. The extracted tobacco residue, the ethanol extract, and the methanol extract were the major sources of benzenediols (catechol, resorcinol, and hydroquinone). From these results, it was proposed that chlorogenic acid in tobacco was a major precursor of the benzenediols, particularly 1,2-benzenediol (catechol), in tobacco smoke. The extracted tobacco residue was also reported as the major source of the monohydric phenols (phenol, cresols, xylenols, and guaiacols). Figure IX.A-2 illustrates the possible relationship between 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) and several complex tobacco phenols subsequently studied as its precursor. In a continuation of their study of the conversion of various tobacco components to catechol, Schlotzhauer et al. (3462) examined the phenols formed during the pyrolysis of a variety of tobacco components, including chlorogenic and caffeic acids, rutin and quercetin, cellulose and lignin, and fructose and sucrose (Table IX.A-15). They reported that chlorogenic acid, usually the most abundant polyphenol in tobacco, produced the highest levels of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) and 4-ethyl-1,2-benzenediol (4-ethylcatechol) during pyrolysis. In addition, the tobacco biopolymer lignin was also reported to be a significant source of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol). Their examination of the phenols generation by pyrolysis of several different flue-cured and burley tobaccos indicated that the flue-cured tobaccos produced significantly higher levels of
the phenols than did the burley tobaccos. A similar situation is obtained when the MSS phenols from cigarettes fabricated from all flue-cured and all burley tobaccos are compared on a milligram of phenol per milligram of CSC basis [Wynder and Hoffmann (4317, 4332)]. Because they considered 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) a “major constituent of tobacco smoke,” a component they considered an important contributor to the biological properties of smoke, Hoffmann and his colleagues at the American Health Foundation conducted an extensive study in the early 1980s on the pyrosynthesis of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) during the tobacco smoking process. The goal of the study was to determine the major precursor(s) in tobacco of the 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in MSS. Initial experiments by Carmella et al. (600) involved the sequential extraction of tobacco with hexane, chloroform, benzene, and methanol, followed by pyrolysis of the material extracted by each solvent and determination of the 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in the pyrolysate. Only the pyrolysates from the methanol extract and the residual extracted tobacco indicated the presence of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) precursors. From the results of a study in which Kentucky reference 1R1 cigarettes were “spiked” with increasing levels of chlorogenic acid (the 3-ester of 3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid with 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexane-carboxylic acid), smoked under standard conditions, and the MSS analyzed for 1,2benzenediol (catechol), Carmella et al. (598) concluded that, under their experimental conditions, chlorogenic acid was not a major precursor in tobacco of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke. This finding was the opposite of that reported by Schlotzhauer et al. (3453, 3462). In a subsequent study by Carmella et al. (602), tobacco was extracted sequentially with hexane then aqueous methanol.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 504
11/13/08 5:22:43 PM
505
Phenols and Quinones
O OH
O HOOC
2 1
3
4 5
OH
OH HO
OH
OH
Chlorogenic acid; 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid CAS No. 327-97-9 Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]1,4,5-trihydroxy-\
trans-Caffeic acid CAS No. 4361-87-9 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
HO
HO O
HO ruffinose
COOH
HO
OH
OH
O
HO
O
HO O
O OH Rutin CAS No. 153-18-4 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[6-O-(6-deoxy-αL-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-
OH
Quercitin CAS No. 117-39-5 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-
Figure IX.A-2 Potential precursors in tobacco of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke.
The major components of the aqueous methanol extract were identified as fructose, glucose, sucrose, and chlorogenic acid. Contributions of each of these tobacco components plus the contributions of the tobacco components cellulose and rutin to the 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) level in cigarette MSS were determined in a “spiking” experiment in which cigarettes were “spiked” with each of the components mentioned, two of which were radiolabeled (fructose and cellulose). The
minimum contributions of these components to the 1,2benzenediol (catechol) level in MSS were: cellulose, 7% to 12%; total of the sugars, glucose, fructose, and sucrose, 4%; chlorogenic acid, 13%; rutin, less than 1%. Carmella et al. considered that a significant portion of the unaccounted for 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) was formed from the other biopolymers, pectin, starch, and hemicellulose. It would appear that these 1984 results on the involvement of chlorogenic acid as a
Table IX.A-15 Pyrolysis of Tobacco Components: Generation of Phenols Tobacco Component Pyrolyzed Phenol
Chlorogenic
Caffeic Acid
Rutin
Quercetin
Lignin
Cellulose
Fructose
Sucrose
× — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
× × ×
— — —
— — —
— — —
× —
× —
× ×
× ×
× ×
— —
— —
— —
×
—
×
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
×
—
—
—
—
—
×
—
…
—
—
×
×
×
Phenol Phenol, 2-methoxy- a Phenol, 2-methoxy4-(1- propenyl)-b 1,2-Benzenediol c 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-methyl1,2-Benzenediol, 4-ethyl1,2-Benzenediol, 4-propylFurfuralsd
Guaiacol Isoeugenol c Catechol d Furfural and/or 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural a
b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 505
11/13/08 5:22:45 PM
506
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1,2-benzenediol (catechol) precursor differed from those presented previously by the same investigators [Carmella et al. (602) vs. Carmella et al. (598) who earlier stated in 1981: The results under these experimental conditions [a “spiking” experiment] suggest that chlorogenic acid is not a major precursor of catechol in cigarette smoke.
Carmella et al. (601) reported that cellulose in tobacco was a major precursor of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke. Comparison of the pyrogenesis of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) from cellulose and carboxymethylcellulose suggested that the 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) level in tobacco smoke might be reduced by modification of the tobacco cellulose. Subsequently, Carmella et al. (599) reported that carboxymethylation of the cellulose in tobacco reduced the 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in the MSS from 252 to 162 µg/ cigarette, a 36% reduction. In addition to investigations of the possible precursors in tobacco of phenols in cigarette MSS, the contribution of several tobacco additives to phenols in MSS was studied. Many years before the advent of the use of expanded tobacco and filter-tip perforations in the design of low- to medium“tar” cigarettes, Kato and Shibayama (2044) reported that vanillin (4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde) incorporated in the tobacco blend by many manufacturers as a flavorant was converted to phenol during the smoking process and therefore should not be used as a cigarette tobacco flavorant. Contradictory results were reported in a subsequent study at RJRT R&D by Eble et al. (1105) with radiolabeled vanillin. They reported that no radiolabeled phenol was detected in the cigarette MSS and concluded that vanillin did not generated phenol during the smoking process. The difference between the Kato and Shibayama 1962 results and the Eble et al. 1985 results was readily explained by the difference in the experimental conditions used in the two studies: Kato and Shibayama (2044) used continuous draw in their smoking regime, that is, no alternating puff and smoldering period, whereas Eble et al. (1105) used the intermittent-puff regime and smoking procedure defined in the U.S. FTC “tar” and nicotine procedure (35-ml puff-volume, 2-sec puff-duration, 1 puff/min, 25°C, 60% relative humidity, etc.). Many flavoring materials have been proposed for use as flavoring materials in tobacco smoking products. Leffingwell et al. (2341) reported that these range from individual chemical compounds to a variety of natural herbs, essential oils, and extracts. Many of the proposed flavoring additives for tobacco smoking products have been included in commercial
products, but many have not. Among the naturally occurring mixtures used historically were deer tongue, tonka bean, and vanilla extract (2341). In the early 1970s, Higman et al. (1649) investigated the pyrolysis of these three historically used tobacco additives to determine their possible contributions to the composition of cigarette smoke. In addition to numerous monocyclic and PAHs and their monocyclic and polycyclic nitrogen analogs, all three pyrolysates contained phenol, cresols, and xylenols. The deer tongue and tonka bean pyrolysates also contained naphthols and coumarin. With regard to the use of these three materials as tobacco additives, the authors noted: The contribution of such additives [tonka bean, deer tongue, vanilla extract] to the chemical and biological effects of cigarette smoke would be in proportion to the amounts of such additives used and also to the pyrolytic-distillation pattern to which the additive is subjected in the thermal flow environment of the burning cigarette.
The report by Gori (1332) and the National Cancer Institute (2683) on the results obtained in the NCI Smoking and Health Program on “less hazardous” cigarettes (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333, 2683) led to an initial concern about the contribution of cocoa added to tobacco to the chemical and biological properties of the smoke from cigarettes containing cocoa-treated tobacco. Subsequent examination of the biological data indicated that the initial concern was unfounded. Schlotzhauer (3447) at the USDA research center in Athens, Georgia, reported the results of his analysis of the pyrolysis of cocoa powder and its possible contribution to the phenols content of smoke from cigarettes made with cocoa-treated tobacco. Pyrolysis of cocoa at various temperatures (350°, 450°, 550°, 650°, and 750°C) yielded phenol, the three dimethylphenols (o-, m-, and p-cresol), several dimethylphenols (xylenols), and 1,2-benzenediol (catechol). From his results, Schlotzhauer concluded: Addition of cocoa powder to tobacco products in the quantities normally utilized for flavoring purposes would not … be expected to significantly enhance the phenolic content of tobacco smoke. Results of the study indicate that the levels of phenols derived from pyrolysis of cocoa should not significantly enhance the phenol content of tobacco smoke …
As shown in Table IX.A-16, comparison of the MSS phenol data from the NCI study on cocoa-free (Sample Code 83) vs. cocoa-treated (Sample Code 82) (1332, 2683) confirms the view expressed by Schlotzhauer (3447).
Table IX.A-16 Smoke Chemistry Data: NCI Study of Cocoa Addition (1332) Relative to “dry” Condensate, µg/g Code No.
Filler
Phenol
o-Cresol
m- and p-Cresol
83 82
SEB III SEB III + 1% cocoa
4.33 4.46
0.68 0.75
1.98 2.02
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 506
11/13/08 5:22:46 PM
Phenols and Quinones
Over a decade later in 1990, Roemer and Hackenberg (3314a) reported the results of mouse skin-painting bioassays in which the CSCs from cigarettes containing various levels of cocoa were tested. The CSCs from cigarettes containing different levels of cocoa (0, 1%, and 3%) were studied for their specific tumorigenicity. Their results contradicted those reported by Gori (1332) for the NCI less hazardous cigarette study. The 1% and 3% addition levels of cocoa were equivalent to and three times, respectively, the level of cocoa usually added to commercial cigarettes. Roemer and Hackenberg noted: We found no evidence for indicating an enhancement of the biological activity of cigarette smoke condensates derived from cigarettes to which 1 and 3% cocoa was added.
Additional details pertinent to cocoa are summarized by Rodgman (3264).
IX.A.4 The Effect of Cigarette Design Parameters on Yield of Mainstream Smoke Phenols Despite the controversy over the biological properties of the phenols in tobacco smoke, that is, were they promoters of the tumorigenicity of the PAHs in the mouse skin-painting bioassay or cocarcinogens for the PAHs in that bioassay? Or were they noncontributors or minor contributors to the bioassay results? The next step after identification, refinement of quantitation procedures, and resolution of the question of precursors was the determination of which cigarette design parameters would permit control of the levels of phenols in MSS. Of course, the first method discovered to control the MSS levels of phenols was their selective filtration by the plasticized cellulose acetate filter tip. The extensive research on phenols in tobacco smoke eventually led to the resolution of the question of whether selective filtration of a particular component or class of components in cigarette MSS was possible. Despite listing effective filtration as an important means to reduce cigarette MSS particulate matter, Wynder and Hoffmann in 1961 (4311) categorized “selective filtration” of a particular component or class of components in cigarette MSS as an impossibility. However, the next year, because of their findings with low molecular weight phenols in the MSS of filter-tipped cigarettes, Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) reversed their previously expressed assertion on the impossibility of “selective filtration.” They reported that the levels of MSS low molecular weight phenols were significantly reduced (75% to 90%) by the plasticized cellulose acetate filter tip. It was determined by numerous investigators that highly volatile, low molecular weight phenols such as phenol and the isomeric methylphenols (the cresols) were selectively filtered from cigarette MSS. That the filter-tip plasticizer (usually triacetin) played a significant role in the selective filtration was demonstrated in the early 1960s by Lorillard (2399), Laurene (2295, 2295a, 2298), Laurene et al. (2311, 2312), Spears (3765), and Hoffmann and Wynder (1791). Brown and Williamson patented the use of Carbowax® as an alternative filter-tip additive for selective filtration of low molecular
507
weight phenols. Low molecular weight phenol levels in MSS were reduced 75% to 90% by the selective filtration of triacetin- or Carbowax®-treated cellulose acetate. Because of the volatility of the low molecular weight phenols, an equilibrium exists between these components of the tobacco smoke aerosol vapor phase and of the tobacco smoke aerosol particulate phase. Thus, these components are substantially partitioned between the particulate phase and vapor phase of cigarette MSS aerosol. The selective filtration (75% to 90%) occurs by removal from the smoke stream of significant amounts of low molecular weight phenols in the aerosol vapor phase. During the brief time of the MSS transit through the plasticized filter tip, removal of the phenols from the vapor phase results in vaporization of the phenols from the particles in attempt to reestablish the original particulate phase-vapor phase equilibrium. Subsequently, it was determined by Fredrickson (1236) in the mid-1960s and by Morie and Sloan (2635) and Brunnemann et al. (514) in the 1970s that similar selective filtration occurred with volatile N-nitrosamines such as N-dimethylnitrosamine and N-diethylnitrosamine with 70% to 80% of the volatile N-nitrosamines being removed from MSS by a plasticized cellulose acetate filter tip. The discovery in the early 1960s of the selective filtration of the low molecular weight phenols from cigarette MSS was subsequently confirmed by numerous investigators throughout the world. As shown by the citations in Table IX.A-17, the selective filtration of phenols from cigarette MSS was extensively studied from the early 1960s to the mid-1970s. A few additional studies have been described from the mid-1970s to date. From these studies, it was also reported by Laurene et al. (2311, 2312) that the effectiveness of the selective filtration of plasticized filter-tip cigarettes decreased during the shelf life of the cigarette. Discovery of the extensive partitioning of low molecular weight phenols between the particulate and vapor phases of cigarette MSS necessitated modifications to the methods for determining them. Although several low molecular weight PAHs such as naphthalene (mol wt 128) and its alkyl derivatives also show some partitioning between the particulate and vapor phases, the high molecular weight PAHs [anthracene and phenanthrene (mol wt 178), B[a]A (mol wt 228), DB[a,h] A (mol wt 278), B[a]P (mol wt 252)] exist almost exclusively in the particulate phase. Before the extent of this partitioning and the selective filtration of low molecular weight phenols had been determined, most early studies dealt with analysis for the per cigarette yield of the low molecular weight phenols in the particulate phase. Thus, the relationships between the per cigarette levels of the tumorigenic PAHs and these phenols in mainstream CSC and the proposed promotion of the specific tumorigenicity of the PAHs by the phenols required reassessment. This research observation-based comment raises the question about the repeated assertion of the importance of the promoting activity of phenol and other low molecular weight phenols, particularly in their supposed enhancement of the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 507
11/13/08 5:22:47 PM
508
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-17 Studies on the Selective Filtration of Phenolic Compounds in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Year
Investigator(s)
Year
Investigator(s)
1962
Davis and George (911a) Lorillard (2399)
1967
George and Keith (1284) Müller and Moldenhauer (2653) Waltz et al. (4122)
1963
Hoffmann and Wynder (1791) Laurene (2295, 2295a) Laurene et al. (2311, 2312) Spears (3765) Waltz and Häusermann (4118)
1968
George (1283) Kallianos et al. (2016)
1969
Georgiev (1284a, 1284b)
1970
Reynolds (3111)
1972
Artho et al. (105)
1974
Baggett and Morie (156)
1975
Baggett and Morie (156) Brunnemann et al. (496)
1976
Brunnemann et al. (497) Kensler (2082)
1980
Mokhnachev and Mironenko (2579)
1994
Wilson (4268)
1964
1965
1966
Esterle and Campbell (1164) Pyriki and Moldenhauer (3043) Seehofer et al. (3574) Testa et al. (3890) Cuzin et al. (884) George (1282a) Kaburaki et al. (1996) Laurene (2298) LeRoux (2351) Lipp (2376, 2377) SEITA (3602) Waltz and Häusermann (4121) Kallianos et al. (2016) Müller and Moldenhauer (2653) Touey and Kiefer (3937)
specific tumorigenicity of PAHs. What kind of tobacco smoke promoter is it that exerts so little effect that, in its absence, the specific tumorigenicity in the mouse skin-painting bioassay of the CSC remains essentially unaltered? Table IX.A-18 illustrates the effect of several tobacco expansion procedures and inclusion of the expanded tobacco in the cigarette blend on the MSS phenol yield. Brunnemann et al. (496, 497) confirmed the previous finding of Waltz et al. (4123) that 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) was the phenol usually present at the highest yield in cigarette MSS. Brunnemann et al. determined that the level of 1,2benzenediol (catechol) in the MSS of a nonfiltered cigarette varied from 160 to 500 µg/cigarette. The level of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in the MSS from a filter-tipped cigarette varied from 60 to 200 µg/cigarette. They also reported that 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) and its derivatives were not selectively reduced by commercial cigarette filter tips as were many low molecular weight monohydric (one hydroxyl group) phenols. In 1953, when reconstituted tobacco sheet (RTS) was introduced into its cigarette products by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company as a cigarette design technology, little was known about either the nature or yields of phenols in cigarette MSS (see Table IX.A-4). Also, the promoting activity of low molecular weight phenols to the specific tumorigenicity of PAHs had not been reported by Boutwell et al. (414). Until the early to mid-1960s, the contribution of RTS to MSS
composition dealt primarily with the decrease in the yields of the MSS PAHs, particularly B[a]P, and the decrease in the specific tumorigenicity (mouse skin) of the CSC as the percent inclusion of the RTS in the blend was increased [see pp. 531–532 in (4332)]. Reports presented during the “less hazardous” cigarette workshop held at the 1967 World Conference on Smoking and Health were published the next year as an NCI monograph edited by Wynder and Hoffmann (4343). Moshy and Halter presented data on the effect of inclusion of experimental RTS in a blend. They wrote (2647a): It is apparent from the data [presented] that selective reductions of up to 45% for benzo[a]pyrene and up to 87% for phenol were achieved with some of the experimental tobacco leaves.
At the same conference, Hoffmann and Wynder (1798) also discussed the percent reduction of the PAH content, specifically the B[a]P content, of the cigarette CSC by inclusion of RTS in the cigarette tobacco blend. Although analytical data on the decrease in TPM, B[a]P, and phenol yields were presented graphically, they had no comment on the significant percent reduction in the phenol content of the MSS, a percent reduction that exceeded that of the B[a]P content. In the NCI Smoking and Health Program on the “less hazardous” cigarette, the substantial lowering of the yields of phenol and the 2-, 3-, and 4-methylphenols (o-, m-, and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 508
11/13/08 5:22:48 PM
509
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-18 Effect of Tobacco Expansion on Levels of Mainstream Smoke Phenols RJRT-Expanded Tobacco Study (3254) Tobacco Blend Composition
Mainstream Smoke Level
% RJRT-Expanded Blend
µg/cig
100 90 75 50 0
0 10 25 50 100
117 106 (9) c 95 (19) 72 (38) 45 (62)
% Flue-Cured
% RJRT-Expanded Flue-Cured 0 100
% Control Blend
b
100 0
126 70 (44) d
mg/g WTPM a 3.36 3.73 (-11) 3.36 (0) 2.76 (18) 2.16 (36)
3.09 2.99 (3)
NCI “Less Hazardous” Cigarette Study (1330, 2683) Mainstream Smoke Level, mg/g WTPMa Tobacco
Code No.
Phenol
o-Cresol
m- + p-Cresol
SEBII b SEBII SEBII SEBII SEBII
42 42 44 45 Avg
3.83 3.66 3.90 3.81 3.80
0.62 0.55 0.63 0.59 0.60
2.04 1.78 1.56 1.65 1.76
48 49 50
2.56 (33) c 2.93 (23) 3.47 (9)
0.36 (40) 0.40 (33) 0.49 (18)
1.10 (40) 1.37 (26) 1.61 (13)
RJRT-expanded SEBII PM-expanded SEBII NCSU-freeze dried SEBII
WTPM = wet total particulate matter SEBII = the Standard Experimental Blend used in the second phase of the NCI “Less Hazardous” Cigarette Study. c The number in parenthesis is the % decrease of the MSS yield of phenols in the MSS from the expanded or freeze-dried SEBII vs. that in the MSS from the control SEBII. a
b
p-cresols) in the MSS from RTS (paper process) cigarettes vs. the tobacco blend (SEBI) was recorded (1329). At RJRT R&D, Newell et al. (2765) reported the results of a detailed study of the effect of increasing the level of RTS (G7) on the composition of cigarette MSS. Decreased MSS yields of the PAHs, nicotine, and phenols plus increased yields in carbon monoxide, aldehydes, ketones, and low molecular weight acids were observed. In 1979, the U.S. Surgeon General (4005) reported the beneficial effects of inclusion of RTS on the MSS composition (B[a]P, phenols, specific tumorigenicity): Cigarette fillers low in wax layer components, either by use of tobacco stems, reconstituted tobacco sheet, or tobacco extracted with a hexane-ethanol mixture, delivered smoke significantly reduced in catechols … Although it has not been directly established that a selective reduction in catechol leads to a significant reduction of the tumorigenic potential of cigarette smoke, it is of interest that all those tars or whole smokes of cigarettes which are low in catechol also have a significant lower tumorigenic activity [Gori (1329, 1330, 1332)].
These comments on the relationship between RTS and the 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) yield in MSS are of interest
because examination of the MSS data from the four sets of experimental cigarettes [Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), NCI (2683)] reveal that no analysis for 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) was conducted on any of the cigarette samples in the study, that is, the 100 or so experimental cigarettes or the standard SEBI, SEBII, SEBIII, or SEBIV cigarettes and the Kentucky 1R1 reference cigarette. In the late 1950s and the 1960s, one of the methods studied to control the pyrosynthesis of PAHs from tobacco during the smoking process was the addition of various materials (inorganic or organic) to the tobacco in attempts to control its combustion and lower the per cigarette PAHs yields, particularly the B[a]P yield, in the tobacco smoke [Alvord and Cardon (56, 57), Lindsey et al. (2370), Rodgman (3246, 3254), Bentley and Burgan (286), Candeli et al. (589), Wynder and Hoffmann (4311, 4317, 4319, 4332), Cuzin et al. (885), deSouza and Scherbak (953), Pyriki et al. (3046), Hoffmann and Wynder (1797, 1798)]. The most effective additives in PAHs reduction were the nitrates. The following explanation of their effectiveness was offered. When heated, the nitrates generate nitric oxide (NO), an odd-electron compound, capable of “scavenging” free radicals thermally generated from tobacco components
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 509
11/13/08 5:22:49 PM
510
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
during the smoking process, thus interrupting the free radical reactions postulated as contributing to one of the mechanisms important in the generation of PAHs in tobacco smoke [see Badger and Spotswood (152), Badger (139a, 140), Badger et al. (141, 142, 147)]. However, in addition to lowering the levels of PAHs in tobacco smoke, addition of nitrates or the use of high-nitrate tobacco affected MSS yield and composition in other ways. In the 1950s and early 1960s, the reductions in the MSS yields of “tar,” nicotine, and PAHs in general and B[a]P in particular were viewed as desirable achievements. When concern was expressed about the supposed promoting action of the low molecular weight phenols, the reduction of their levels in MSS by nitrate addition to the tobacco was also viewed positively. These decreases were, however, accompanied by an increase in the level of NO in the smoke. Subsequently, two reported observations did much to dampen the enthusiasm for nitrate addition to the tobacco and/or the use of highnitrate tobaccos in the blend: • The identification of various volatile and tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and its smoke and the positive dependence of their levels in both tobacco and smoke on the nitrate level of the tobacco [Morie and Sloan (2635), Tso et al. (3985), Brunnemann et al. (499)]. • The identification of a series of nitrophenols, many of which are known to be highly toxic, in the MSS from cigarettes fabricated with nitrate-treated tobacco and/ or with high-nitrate tobaccos in the blend [Kallianos et al. (2016), Klus and Kuhn (2137)]. Table IX.A-19 summarizes some of the studies on the use of nitrate addition to tobacco and/or use of high-nitrate tobacco to reduce the yields of PAHs in cigarette MSS. Also noted in Table IX.A-19 are some of the other compositional changes observed in MSS yield and composition. In most instances, the yields of MSS PAHs in general and B[a]P were reduced although an occasional exception was observed, for example, in the NCI Smoking and Health Program on “less hazardous” cigarettes the MSS B[a]P yield increased with nitrate addition but the B[a]A yield decreased (1329). Benner et al. (274) reported that a comparison of the low molecular weight phenols in the MSS from high- and low-nitrate tobaccos showed little difference in the yields of phenol per milligram total particulate matter (TPM) but significant decreases in the yields of the methylphenols (the cresols) per milligram TPM. Benner et al. (276, 277) also reported that treatment of tobacco with an alternative combustion modifier (3:7 boric acid:sodium tetraborate decahydrate) increased the levels of low molecular weight phenols in cigarette MSS, an increase that was paralleled by the increase in low molecular weight phenols in the pyrolysates from cellulose or lignin treated with the same boric acid-tetraborate modifier. In the mid-1970s, Brunnemann et al. (497) described an improved method for the quantitation of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke and a possible way to reduce its MSS level. The procedure they described involved extraction of
tobacco with a hexane-ethanol azeotrope which removed from the tobacco what Brunnemann et al. defined as “waxes.” They noted: Compared to the corresponding control cigarette, the dry TPM [from a cigarette filled with reconstituted tobacco from which the “wax” layer had been removed by hexane-ethanol azeotrope extraction] had been reduced by 44%, the nicotine by 47% and catechol by 85%. This demonstrates a strong, selective reduction of catechols in the smoke by the removal of the “wax” layer.
Additional impetus to study the level and source of 1,2benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke was provided by Hecht et al. (1562), who asserted that 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) was an important tobacco smoke cocarcinogen. They also noted that the levels of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in cigarette MSS were reduced by prior extraction of the tobacco with a hexane-ethanol azeotrope or by inclusion of RTS in the tobacco blend. From the results of their study of cellulose vs. carboxymethylcellulose as a precursor of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke, Carmella et al. (599, 601) reported that the carboxymethylation of tobacco cellulose significantly reduced the level of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke. Wynder and Hoffmann asserted that cigarette MSS yield and composition were controllable in a beneficial way by increasing the number of cuts per inch in the tobacco blend filler. Results obtained in the NCI program on the “less hazardous” cigarette and reported in 1976 by Gori (1329) and 1980 by NCI (2683) were contradictory to the unpublished results obtained in 1963 by Hoffmann and Wynder and later reported by Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 318 in (4319), pp. 529–531 in (4332), (4330)]. In the NCI study, important analytes such as B[a]P, B[a]A, phenol, and the three methylphenols (cresols) showed no consistent relationship between their MSS yields and width of cut of the cigarette tobacco filler. The mouse skin-painting bioassay also showed no consistency between % TBA and the CSCs generated from cigarettes with fillers of different cut widths. In their report of the results of an unpublished study by Hoffmann and Wynder of the effect of width of cut of the cigarette filler, Wynder and Hoffmann reported that increasing the number of cuts per inch (decreasing the cut width) decreased the per cigarette MSS yield of TPM and B[a]P. They did not report on the effect of cut width on phenols delivery. However, they did report that the specific tumorigenicity of the CSCs from cigarette fabricated with tobacco at 20, 30, and 50 cuts per inch decreased as the number of cuts per inch increased [see p. 318 in (4319), pp. 529–531 in (4332), (4330)]. Subsequently, Wynder and Hecht (4306d) tabulated the effect on chemical and biological properties of change in cut width as: “insignificant” for the change in per cigarette MSS yields of carbon monoxide, “tar,” nicotine, and B[a]P, as “insignificant” for the change in MSS ciliatoxicity, as “insignificant” for the change in specific tumorigenicity (mouse skin) of the CSC, and “unknown” for the changes in tumor promoting effect. Their table was used essentially unchanged by the Surgeon General in his 1979 report on smoking and health (4009).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 510
11/13/08 5:22:50 PM
511
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-19 Studies Involving Nitrate Addition to Tobacco Nitrate Identity
Change in CSC
Amount Added, %
B[a]P Level
Tumorigenicity
Comments
References
5.0 2.0 2.0
decrease decrease decrease
Rodgman and Cook (3269)
NaNO3
2.0 4.0 5.0 2.5 1.0 5.0
decrease decrease decrease decrease decrease decrease
Bentley and Burgan (286)
Cu (NO3)2.5 H2O Cu (NO3)2.5 H2O
5.0 5.0
decrease decrease
Mg (NO3)2.6H2O Al (NO3)3.9H2O KNO3 Cu (NO3)2
Cu (NO3)2.5 H2O
decrease decrease
Wynder and Hoffmann (4312) Wynder and Hoffmann (4317)
decrease
Pyriki et al. (3046)
KNO3
NaNO3
8.3
decrease
decrease
NaNO3
3.0 8.3 2.5
decrease decrease decrease
decrease decrease decrease
KNO3
0.1% vs. 1.66% nitrate tobacco
decrease
MSS 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) yield/cig inversely related to tobacco nitrate level, 4-nitro-1,2-benzenediol yield/cig related to tobacco nitrate level
Kallianos et al. (2016)
TPM/cig decreased, phenol/cig yield decreased, phenol/mg of CSC decreased, no N-nitrosamines detected in nitrate-enhanced tobacco cigarettes
Hoffmann and Wynder (4332)
Hoffmann and Wynder (1798) methylphenols (cresols) yields/mg TPM inversely related to tobacco nitrate level; little difference in phenol/mg TPM delivery
Benner et al. (274)
Klus and Kuhn (2137)
KNO3
1.3
ND
ND
yields of a series of nitrophenols identified in MSS from nitratetreated and high-nitrate tobacco cigarettes directly proportional to nitrate content of filler
KNO3
2.8
increase
decrease
increased nitrate gave Gori (1329) decreased phenol/mg TPM and methylphenols (cresols) levels/mg TPM, NO increased relative to TPM
2.3
decrease
decrease (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 511
11/13/08 5:22:52 PM
512
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-19 (Continued) Studies Involving Nitrate Addition to Tobacco Nitrate Identity
B[a]P level
Tumorigenicity
Comments
References
NO3 addition
decrease
decrease
nitrate addition and/or use of high-nitrate tobacco classified as “only of academic interest” because of undesirable N-nitrosamine-nitrate relationship.
Wynder and Hecht (4306d)
NO3 addition
decrease
decrease
Surgeon General reiterated Wynder-Hecht (4306d) comment.
USPHS (4005)
decrease
decrease
despite decreases in TPM, B[a]P, phenols, CSC tumorigenicity, use of low-nitrate tobacco or nitrate removal recommended because of undesirable N-nitrosamine-nitrate relationship.
Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480, 486)
decrease
decrease
MSS 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) level inversely related to nitrate content of filler; MSS volatile and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine levels proportional to nitrate content of filler
Adams et al. (28)
NaNO3
Amount Added, %
Change in CSC
0.7 to 2.5
In the NCI Smoking and Health Program on “less hazardous” cigarettes [Gori (1329), NCI (2683)] the effects of cut width on cigarette smoke properties (chemical composition, biological properties) were not as pronounced as the effects reported in Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 318 in (4319), pp. 529–531 in (4332), (4330)]. Examination of the summary of these studies in Table IX.A-20 reveals the lack of confirmation of the Hoffmann-Wynder results. In fact, the proposal that cut width would be a significant technology in the design of a “less hazardous” cigarette was similar to many of the proposals from the so-called cigarette design experts not associated with the tobacco industry. Of the numerous technologies proposed during the decade-long NCI study, only those eight technologies proposed by U.S. tobacco company and/or tobacco supplier R&D personnel were eventually classified as significant by the NCI (2683), Gori (1332, 1333), the U.S. Surgeon General (4005, 4009), and other anti-tobaccosmoking investigators such as Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740).
The effectiveness of the various methods proposed to control the yield of the supposed promoting low molecular phenols may be summarized as: Tobacco extraction with wax-dissolving nonpolar organic solvents (hexane, pentane) to remove PAH precursors does indeed result in reduced levels of PAHs, including B[a]P, in cigarette MSS. However, the solution of what was considered by some as a possible PAH problem is accompanied by the creation of two alternative problems, both of which might be criticized from a scientific point of view. For example, extractive removal of the nonpolar organic solvent-soluble material results in an increase in the percentage of the organic solvent-insoluble biopolymers (the major phenols precursors cellulose, pectins, starch, and lignin) in the extracted tobacco residue. Smoking of the extracted residue in cigarette form yields higher levels of low molecular weight phenols in the MSS (3277, 3305). In addition, nitrates in the tobacco are not removed by solution in nonpolar organic solvents, so their percentages in the extracted tobacco residue increase.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 512
11/13/08 5:22:53 PM
513
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.A-20 Effect of Cut Width on Mainstream Smoke Properties PAHa, µg/g. Tobacco, cuts/in
Condensate, mg/cig
B[a]P
Phenol, mg/g
B[a]A
Phenol
2-Methylphenolb
3- and 4-Methylphenolb
% TBA
Hoffmann and Wynder [see p. 318 in (4319), pp. 529–531 in (4332), (4330)] 8 20 30 50 60
29.1 27.3 25.4 24.4 23.0
1.27 1.25 1.30 0.94 0.91
20
32.6
0.91
1.40
4.35
0.78
1.85
32
30.2
0.72
1.20
3.95
0.72
1.83
60
29.6
0.86
1.31
4.17
0.63
1.92
27 16 13
Gori (1329), NCI (2683)
a
b c d
46c 33d 44.6c 45.0d 39c 39d
PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene; B[a]A = benz[a]anthracene, % TBA = % tumor-bearing animals 2-Methylphenol, 3-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol = o-, m-, and p-cresol, respectively Painting dose = 50 mg of cigarette smoke condensate/day Painting dose = 25 mg of cigarette smoke condensate/day
Experimental results reported by Morie and Sloan (2635), Tso et al. (3985), and Brunnemann et al. (499) indicated that smoking of this increased-nitrate-level extracted residue in cigarette form would yield higher levels of N-nitrosamines in the MSS. Tobacco extraction with a hexane-ethanol azeotrope selectively reduced the levels of 1,2-benzenediols (catechols) in the cigarette MSS. Tobacco extraction with a polar organic solvent system (aqueous ethanol or aqueous methanol) removes chlorogenic acid, a known major precursor of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol), a phenol categorized as a cocarcinogen. Because nitrate addition to tobacco resulted in reduction of the cigarette MSS deliveries of “tar,” nicotine, PAHs including B[a]P, and the low molecular weight phenols, nitrate addition and/or use of high-nitrate tobacco was considered to be the way to introduce the most effective combustion modifier. However, while apparently solving several problems concerning MSS yield and composition, nitrate addition caused several alternate problems. Once the levels of N-nitrosamines and nitrogen oxides (NO) in tobacco smoke were shown to be positively correlated to the nitrate content of the tobacco filler, nitrate addition and the use of high-nitrate tobaccos were eventually viewed as undesirable technologies. In addition, higher nitrate tobacco fillers, whether a result of nitrate addition or inclusion of high-nitrate tobaccos, generated a series of nitrophenols, many of which are known to be highly toxic. From a comparison of the pyrogenesis of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) from cellulose vs. carboxymethylcellulose, it was reported that the carboxymethylation of tobacco cellulose significantly reduced the level of 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in tobacco smoke (599, 601).
Of the various technologies proposed to control the levels of phenols in cigarette MSS, selective filtration appears to be the most effective and most efficient. A significant portion (65% to 75%) of the low molecular weight monohydric phenols in cigarette MSS is removed from the smoke stream by a cellulose acetate filter tip plasticized with triacetin. As the cigarette ages, the plasticizer is slowly absorbed by the cellulose acetate fiber and the effectiveness of the selective filtration gradually decreases with time. The one drawback with selective filtration is that it does not occur with dihydric phenols such as 1,2-benzenediol (catechol) in the MSS, that is, 1,2-benzenediol and its homologs are not selectively removed from MSS by a plasticized filter tip. Many of the complex tobacco-only phenolic components have interesting structures in that they contain a cyclohexanecarboxylic acid moiety linked to one of the following: (1) a 4-hydroxyphenyl group, for example, p-coumaroylquinic acid, (2) a 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl group, for example, chlorogenic acid, or (3)) a 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl group, for example, 3-O-feruloylquinic acid. In each case, one can theorize that during the tobacco smoking process the complex tobacco phenol could sequentially yield a substituted 2-propenoic acid, a substituted benzaldehyde, a substituted benzoic acid, and a simple phenol. Table IX.A-21 summarizes the possible sequence of the pyrogenesis of such components. Each of the compounds listed as tobacco smoke components in Table IX.A-21 has been identified in cigarette MSS. A similar situation exists with a series of components in which a variously substituted 4H-1-benzopyranone is linked to a 4-hydroxyphenyl group, such as, kaempferol, or a 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl group, for example, quercitin, quercitrin, and rutin.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 513
11/13/08 5:22:54 PM
514
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-21 Theoretical Relationship between Phenols in Tobacco and Several Phenols in Tobacco Smoke Phenols
In Table IX.A-22, the various phenolic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke are listed, with appropriate references to the identifications for each. Many of the references cited contain additional references pertinent to the phenolic component in question. The many references cited in Table IX.A-22 include a variety of topics pertinent to the particular phenol. They cover the following topics:
1. The isolation and/or identification of the phenol from tobacco and/or smoke 2. Methods to quantitate the phenolic component in tobacco and/or smoke
3. Determination of the precursors in tobacco of the phenolic compound in smoke 4. Cigarette design technologies to decrease the per cigarette MSS yield of the phenolic compound 5. The biological properties of the phenolic compound 6. Discussions by personnel from governmental agencies, medical institutions, etc., on the biological problems pertinent to a given phenolic compound
While 558 phenolic components have been completely or partially identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke, 244
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 514
11/13/08 5:22:55 PM
Phenols and Quinones
515
Table IX.A-22 Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 515
11/13/08 5:23:02 PM
516
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 516
11/13/08 5:23:04 PM
Phenols and Quinones
517
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 517
11/13/08 5:23:05 PM
518
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 518
11/13/08 5:23:06 PM
Phenols and Quinones
519
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 519
11/13/08 5:23:08 PM
520
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 520
11/13/08 5:23:11 PM
Phenols and Quinones
521
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 521
11/13/08 5:23:13 PM
522
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 522
11/13/08 5:23:16 PM
Phenols and Quinones
523
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 523
11/13/08 5:23:18 PM
524
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 524
11/13/08 5:23:22 PM
Phenols and Quinones
525
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 525
11/13/08 5:23:23 PM
526
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 526
11/13/08 5:23:27 PM
Phenols and Quinones
527
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 527
11/13/08 5:23:28 PM
528
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 528
11/13/08 5:23:31 PM
Phenols and Quinones
529
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 529
11/13/08 5:23:32 PM
530
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 530
11/13/08 5:23:36 PM
Phenols and Quinones
531
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 531
11/13/08 5:23:37 PM
532
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 532
11/13/08 5:23:38 PM
Phenols and Quinones
533
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 533
11/13/08 5:23:42 PM
534
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 534
11/13/08 5:23:43 PM
Phenols and Quinones
535
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 535
11/13/08 5:23:47 PM
536
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 536
11/13/08 5:23:48 PM
Phenols and Quinones
537
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 537
11/13/08 5:23:52 PM
538
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 538
11/13/08 5:23:54 PM
Phenols and Quinones
539
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 539
11/13/08 5:23:57 PM
540
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 540
11/13/08 5:23:58 PM
Phenols and Quinones
541
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 541
11/13/08 5:24:02 PM
542
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 542
11/13/08 5:24:03 PM
Phenols and Quinones
543
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 543
11/13/08 5:24:07 PM
544
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 544
11/13/08 5:24:08 PM
Phenols and Quinones
545
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 545
11/13/08 5:24:12 PM
546
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.A-22 (Continued) Phenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 546
11/13/08 5:24:13 PM
547
Phenols and Quinones
were identified in tobacco only, 444 in tobacco smoke only, and 130 were identified in both tobacco and smoke. For the tobacco smoke components partially identified, the nature and/or position of an alkyl substitute was not defined by the investigator.
IX.B Quinones Even in the mid-1950s when knowledge of the composition of tobacco smoke was extremely limited and only a few phenols were known to be present in tobacco smoke, it was suggested that several of the phenols might be converted to the corresponding quinone during the smoking process. This suggestion, coupled with the mouse skin-painting bioassay results reported by Takizawa (3865a) that several simple quinones such as 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone), 1,2-naphthalenedione (1,2-naphthoquinone), and 1,4-naphthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone) were tumorigenic to mouse skin, raised serious questions about the desirability of adding phenols to the tobacco blend to enhance the odor and flavor of its smoke. Despite the many studies in which benzene was used as the solvent for testing of the tumorigenicity of PAHs, benzene seldom induced tumors in
the skin-painted solvent-control group of laboratory animals [Hartwell (1543, 1544), Shubik and Hartwell (3664, 3665), Thompson et al. (3908)]. Similarly, naphthalene was found to be nontumorigenic in skin-painting studies. The mouse skin-painting bioassay results with 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) were subsequently confirmed by Tiedemann (3916a). Neither of the higher molecular weight tricyclic quinones 9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) (3865a) or 9,10-phenanthrenedione (9, 10-phenanthrenequinone) (3865a) was reported to be tumorigenic to mouse skin. In the early days of the studies on the specific tumorigenicity of various classes of compounds to mouse skin, investigators were intrigued by the activities exhibited by aromatic hydrocarbons, their dihydric phenols, and the quinones corresponding to the dihydric phenols. The results of mouse skin-painting bioassays with various aromatic hydrocarbons ranging in complexity from monocyclic to hexacyclic, their dihydric phenols, and the corresponding quinones are summarized in Table IX.B-1. From the studies on the chemical relationship between aromatic hydrocarbons and their quinones, the theory of the oxidation-reduction potential of quinones was proposed.
Table IX.B-1 Comparison of the Tumorigenicities of Aromatic Hydrocarbons, their Diols (Phenols), and their Diones (Quinones) Hydrocarbon Benzene
Diol
Dione
–
1,4-benzenediol (hydroquinone)
–
2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone)
+
–
1,2-benzenediol (catechol)
–
3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,2-dione (o-benzoquinone)
?
(1,2-naphthoquinone)
–
1,2-naphthalenediol 1,2-naphthalenedione
+
1,4-naphthalenediol
–
1,4-naphthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone)
+
9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone)
–
(9,10-phenanthraquinone) 9,10-phenanthrenedione
– –
Naphthalene
Anthracene
–
9,10-anthracenediol
–
Phenanthrene
–
9,10-phenanthrenediol
–
5,6-chrysenediol
–
5,6-chrysenedione (5,6-chrysenequinone) 6,12-chrysenedione 7,12-benz[a]anthracenedione
Chrysene
Benz[a]anthracene
±
6,12-chrysenediol 7,12-benz[a]anthracenediol
– –
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
±
7,14-dibenz[a,h]anthracenediol
–
Benzo[a]pyrene Dibenzo[b,def]chrysene
–
(7,12-benz[a]anthraquinone) 7,14-dibenz[a,h]anthracenedione (7,14-dibenz[a,h]anthraquinone)
–
+
benzo[a]pyroquinone
–
+
7,14-dibenzo[b,def]chrysenedione
–
– = negative response in mouse skin-painting bioassay + = positive response in mouse skin-painting bioassay ± = equivocal response in mouse skin-painting bioassay
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 547
11/13/08 5:24:13 PM
548
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
A prime proponent of this theory was Fieser (1180b), who reported the reduction potentials of the following quinones: • Several anthracenediones other than 9,10-anthracenedione [Conant and Fieser (790b), Fieser (1180a-1)]. • 9,10-Phenanthrenedione (9,10-phenanthraquinone) [Fieser (1180a-2)]. • 2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione ( p-benzoquinone) [Fieser (1180a-3)]. • Several naphthalenediones other than the 1,2- and 1,4-naphthalenediones [Fieser (1180a-4)]. • 7,12-Benz[a]anthracenedione (7,12-benz[a]anthraquinone), 7,14-dibenz[a,h]anthracenedione (7,14benz[a,h]anthraquinone), 5,6-chrysenedione (5,6-chrysenequinone), 6,12-chrysenedione (6,12chrysenequinone) [Fieser and Dietz (1180a-5)]. • 3,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,2-dione (o-benzoquinone) and 1,2-naphthalenedione (1,2-naphthoquinone [Fieser and Peters (1180a-6)]. • 9,10-Anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) [Fieser and Peters (1180a-7)] • 1,4-Naphthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone) [Fieser and Fieser (1180a-8)]. After the first demonstrations by Kennaway and Hieger (2078) of the tumorigenicity to mouse skin of DB[a,h]A, a PAH synthesized by Fieser and Dietz (1184), and of B[a]P by Barry et al. (194), the coal tar component isolated from coal tar and subsequently synthesized by Cook et al. (796a, 797), the tumorigenicity of a great number of PAHs and their derivatives was studied. Soon observed was the pronounced contrast between the gradation in specific tumorigenicities in the mouse skinpainting bioassay from the nontumorigenicity of the monoand bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons benzene and naphthalene, respectively, to the potent tumorigenicities of the pentacyclic aromatic hydrocarbons DB[a,h]A and B[a]P vs. the tumorigenicities of the quinones 2,5-cyclohexadien-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone), 1,2-naphthalenedione (1,2-naphthoquinone), and 1,4-naphthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone) and the nontumorigenicities of dibenzanthraquinone and benzopyroquinone. Neither the tricyclic aromatic hydrocarbons anthracene and phenanthrene nor their corresponding quinones have elicited tumors in the mouse skin-painting bioassay. The tumorigenicities of the tetracyclic hydrocarbons benz[a]anthracene and chrysene have been classified as extremely weak or equivocal. None of their quinones has shown tumorigenicity in the mouse skin-painting bioassay (see Table IX.B-1). Initially it was found that the higher the tumorigenic potency of the quinones, particularly the benzoquinones and the naphthoquinones, the higher was the reduction potential of the quinone. In essence, the oxidation-reduction potential theory was eventually used in an attempt to relate the oxidation-reduction potential of the hydrocarbon-quinone system to the specific tumorigenicity observed in the mouse skin-painting bioassays for PAHs and their quinones.
Although none of the diols (phenols) listed in Table IX.B-1 was found to be tumorigenic, in subsequent research dealing with the metabolism of tumorigenic PAHs, it was found that some of the dihydrodiols and dihydrodiol epoxides were tumorigenic to mouse skin [see review by Dipple et al. (983)]. However, it is obvious from examination of the structures of the dihydrodiols and dihydrodiol epoxides that none of these metabolites is a phenol. As the laboratory data and understanding of chemical carcinogenesis increased dramatically pre- and post-World War II, exceptions to the theory of oxidation-reduction potential resulted in its being supplanted by other more meaningful theories, for example, the relationship between electronic configuration, the activity of the so-called K region, and the inactivity of the so-called L region in aromatic compounds, particularly PAHs, and their tumorigenicity [see reviews by Coulson (829), Pullman and Pullman (3003)]. The interest in the theory of the electronic configuration-tumorigenesis relationship of PAHs was such that the 1953 review by Coulson was selected as the introductory chapter in Volume 1 of the newly instituted publication, Advances in Cancer Research. It is interesting to note that even in the early 1950s, the idea of the involvement of a hydroxylated PAH metabolite in tumorigenesis was already being discussed. For example, Pullman and Pullman (3003) wrote: It is nevertheless generally admitted that [dihydro]diols are probably intermediates in the metabolism of aromatic hydrocarbons
Although their speculation as to the precise nature of its involvement was somewhat in error, the Pullmans (3003) did propose that a dihydroepoxide might also be involved in the metabolism of PAHs, the metabolite-cellular component interaction, and the tumorigenicity attributed to some of the PAHs. The oxidation-reduction potential of the aromatic hydrocarbon-quinone system and its possible involvement in cigarette smoke was revisited some years later. Schmeltz et al. (3510) reported that cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) possessed reducing properties sufficient to reduce 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4dione (1,4-benzoquinone; p-benzoquinone) to 1,4-benzenediol (hydroquinone). This CSC-induced reduction apparently did not occur with 9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone). Compared to the number of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phenols identified in tobacco smoke, the number if quinones identified is low despite the fact that many of the phenols after their pyrogenesis during the smoking process could realistically yield quinones. Table IX.B-2 lists the forty-eight quinones identified to date in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Of the forty-eight, thirty-three were identified in smoke, twenty-one in tobacco, and only six in both. In his 1954 review of tobacco smoke components identified to that date, Kosak (2170) listed no quinone. In view of tobacco smoke composition findings after the mid-1950s, the suggestion in the late 1950s by Rodgman that phenols were inappropriate additives for cigarette smoke flavor
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 548
11/13/08 5:24:14 PM
549
Phenols and Quinones
enhancement might have been an example of excessive caution. His suggestion was based on two factors, the promoting effect of phenols reported in 1955, 1956, and 1959 by Boutwell and his colleagues (414) plus the possible conversion during the smoking process of substituted phenols to corresponding quinones, several of which had been reported to be tumorigenic by Takizawa (3865a) and Tiedemann (3916a). Obviously, the latter situation occurred infrequently. The great discrepancy between the large number of phenols and the small number
of quinones identified in tobacco smoke suggests that the phenol-quinone conversion does not occur in many instances or, if it does occur, the conversion results in the generation of extremely low levels of the quinone. As noted elsewhere, it has been estimated from examination of the many peaks and shoulders in the detailed glass capillary gas chromatograms from tobacco smoke and/or its fractions that the number of tobacco smoke components exceeds the number of identified tobacco smoke components by factors ranging from 10 to 25,
Table IX.B-2 Quinones Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 549
11/13/08 5:24:18 PM
550
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.B-2 (continued) Quinones Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 550
11/13/08 5:24:19 PM
Phenols and Quinones
551
Table IX.B-2 (continued) Quinones Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 551
11/13/08 5:24:22 PM
552
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table IX.B-3 Chronology of Identification of Quinones in Tobacco and/or Smoke Year
Event
1924–1934
Fieser and his colleagues investigated the reduction of quinones and generated the theory of the oxidation-reduction potential of quinones. The reduction of the following quinones was studied: Several anthracenediones other than 9,10-anthracenedione [Conant and Fieser (790b), Fieser (1180a)], 9,10-phenanthrenedione (9,10-phenanthraquinone) (1180a), 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) [Fieser (1180a)], several naphthalenediones other than the 1,2- and 1,4-naphthalenediones [Fieser (1180a)], 3,5-cyclohexadiene-1,2-dione (o-benzoquinone) and 1,2naphthalenedione (1,2-naphthoquinone) [Fieser and Peters (1180a)], 9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) [Fieser and Peters (1180a)], 1,4-naphthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone) [Fieser and Fieser (1180a)] 7,12-benz[a]anthracenedione (7,12-benz[a]anthraquinone), 7,14-dibenz[a,h]anthracenedione (7,14-benz[a,h]anthraquinone), 5,6-chrysenedione (5,6-chrysene-quinone), 6,12-chrysenedione (6,12-chrysenequinone) [Fieser and Dietz (1180a)]. Later, the theory of the oxidation-reduction potential of quinones was advanced to explain the differences in tumorigenicity of the various quinones and their aromatic hydrocarbons sources.
1940–1941
Takizawa (3865a) reported that several simple quinones [2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone), 1,2naphthalenedione (1,2-naphthoquinone), 1,4-naphthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone)] were tumorigenic in mouse skin-painting experiments.
1942
Fieser (1180b) reviewed the theory of the oxidation-reduction potential of quinones. Because some nontumorigenic aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, naphthalene) yielded tumorigenic quinones, some nontumorigenic aromatic hydrocarbons yielded nontumorigenic quinones, and some tumorigenic aromatic hydrocarbons (dibenz[a,h] anthracene) yielded nontumorigenic quinones, attempts were made to correlate the relationship between aromatic hydrocarbons, their quinones, the reduction potential of quinones, and the tumorigenicities (mouse skin) of the aromatic hydrocarbons vs. the tumorigenicities of their quinones.
1953
Tiedemann (3916a) confirmed the finding of Takizawa on the tumorigenicity of 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) to mouse skin.
1953–1955
The theory of oxidation-reduction potential of quinones was supplanted by other more meaningful theories, e.g., the relationship between electronic configuration, the activity of the so-called K region, and the inactivity of the so-called L region in aromatic compounds, particularly PAHs, and their tumorigenicity [see reviews by Coulson (829) and Pullman and Pullman (3003)].
1954
Kosak (2170) in his compilation of tobacco smoke components reported in the literature did not list a quinone.
1957
Bonnet and Neukomm (396) suspected the presence of 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) in cigarette mainstream smoke because of the identification of 1,4-benzenediol (hydroquinone) when the smoke was collected under reducing conditions. Under similar reducing conditions, they were unable to identify 1,4-napthalenediol, concluding that 1,4-napthalenedione (1,4-naphthoquinone) was not present in the smoke.
1959
Bentley and Berry (282) in their compilation of identified tobacco smoke components listed the report of 2,5cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) by Bonnet and Neukomm (396).
1959
In their review of tobacco and tobacco smoke composition, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed no quinone in tobacco or tobacco smoke.
1961
Onishi et al. (2860) reported the presence of 9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) in tobacco smoke.
1965
Kröller (2195) reported the presence of 9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) and 9,10-phenanthrenedione (9,10-phenanthraquinone) in tobacco smoke.
1965
To estimate the 1,4-benzenediol (hydroquinone) in tobacco smoke, Testa et al. (3891) used air oxidation to convert the 1,4-benzenediol (hydroquinone) to 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) which was subsequently derivatized and estimated. No effort was made to determine whether any 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) was already present in the smoke prior to the air oxidation.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 552
11/13/08 5:24:23 PM
553
Phenols and Quinones
Table IX.B-3 (continued) Chronology of Identification of Quinones in Tobacco and/or Smoke Year
Event
1968
In his review of tobacco and tobacco smoke composition, Stedman (3797) listed only two quinones, 9,10anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) in tobacco and 2,3,6-trimethyl-1,3-naphthalenedione (2,3,6-trimethyl-1,4naphthoquinone) in tobacco smoke. He discussed the Bonnet and Neukomm (396) report. Because of the uncertainty of the Bonnet and Neukomm data and additional data from Testa et al. (3891), Stedman did not include 2,5cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione (p-benzoquinone) as a tobacco smoke component. He also did not include the reports of the presence of 9,10-anthracenedione (9,10-anthraquinone) [Onishi et al. (2960), Kröller (2195)] or 9,10phenanthrenedione (9,10-phenanthraquinone) (2195) in tobacco smoke
1968–1969
Bell et al. (246, 247) reported the presence of several alkylated 9,10-anthracenediones in tobacco smoke.
1969–1978
RJRT R&D personnel identified numerous previously unidentified alkylated 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-diones and 9,10-anthracenediones in tobacco smoke [Green et al. (1360, 1378), Schumacher et al. (3553), Heckman (1586), Newell et al. (2769)].
1976–1977
Schmeltz et al. (3510) identified several previously unidentified alkylated 2,5-cyclohexadiene-1,4-diones and 9,10-anthracenediones in tobacco smoke.
1978–1980
Snook et al. (3747, 3748) identified a series of alkyl-, dialkyl-, trialkyl-, and tetraalkyl-1,4-naphthalenediones.in tobacco smoke.
for example, see Wakeham (4103). It is possible that quinones contribute to some of the extremely minor chromatographic peaks representing components as yet unidentified. Table IX.B-3 lists the chronology of some of the major events pertinent to the identification of quinones in tobacco smoke. It is obvious that the number of significant events
for these quinones is substantially less than those cataloged for the PAHs, the aza-arenes, the phenols, and the N-nitrosamines. More than likely, the difference is a direct reflection of the concern expressed relative to the tumorigenicity in laboratory animals of the various classes of compounds.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C009.indd 553
11/13/08 5:24:23 PM
10
The Ethers
Assessment of the chronology of the number of ethers identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke provides another excellent example of the effect of the advancements in analytical technology on our ability to identify components in a complex mixture. In his 1954 review of the components identified to that date in tobacco smoke, Kosak (2170) lists only two ethers, 2-furancarboxaldehyde (furfural) and 1,6-anhydro-β-Dglucopyranose (levoglucosan). Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) did not list ethers as a specific class of components in tobacco or tobacco smoke but did mention the identification of several under different headings in their 1959 review, for example, furan, 2-methylfuran, 2-furancarboxaldehyde (furfural) and two of its derivatives, 3,4-dihydro-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-2-(4,8, 12-trimethyltridecyl)-2H-1-benzopyran-6-ol (α-tocopherol) and 3,4-dihydro-2,7,8-trimethyl-2-(4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32-octamethyl-3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31-tritriacontaoctaenyl)-2H-1-benzopyran-6-ol (solanachromene), the monosaccharides glucose and fructose, the disaccharide sucrose, the trisaccharides raffinose and planteose, and the tetrasaccharide stachyose. Overall, fewer than thirty ethers are listed by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971). From 1959 to date the number of ethers identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke has increased over 30-fold to 992, 506 of which have been identified in tobacco smoke, 659 in tobacco, and 173 in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. In his 1968 review, Stedman (3797) tabulated the presence of five cyclic ethers in tobacco smoke, that is, furan, methylfuran, 2,5-dimethylfuran, tetrahydrofuran, and tetrahydropyran. Currently, the identified ethers with a furan nucleus exceed 275, those with a pyran nucleus exceed 225. The methoxy and ethoxy ethers number over 260, phenoxy ethers number 20.
One of the types of ethers that received considerable attention were the ethers derived from the cyclotetradecanols (see Figure X-1). Because of their unusual structure, none of them was counted in the furan or pyran nucleus group. Over twenty-five of these ethers have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke (9, 12, 3351, 3352, 3360, 3361, 4089–4091). As noted by Rodgman (3266), many components, including a number of ethers, used by the tobacco industry in its flavor formulations [see listing by Doull et al. (1053)] are known components of additive-free tobacco and/or its smoke. Thus, such additives are not strangers to tobacco and/or its smoke but their addition increases the consumer acceptable flavor. Table X-1 lists some of the tobacco and/or tobacco smoke ether components that have been or are used in flavor formulations. In Table X-2 are listed the various ethers identified to date in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. Of the 992 ethers identified to date, 506 have been reported in smoke, 659 in tobacco, and 173 in both.
Overall Summary of Oxygen-Containing Components of Tobacco and/or Smoke: Chapters 2 through 10 Table X-3 summarizes the distribution in our catalogs in Chapters 2 through 10 of the O-containing components identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. As we have noted in the introductions to each of the nine chapters, the numbers for the various classes of O-containing components have escalated tremendously since the last published review by Stedman (3797) in 1968 on tobacco and tobacco smoke components identified to that date.
555
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 555
11/13/08 5:24:58 PM
556
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
CH3
H 3C H 3C
10 11
9
8 1
6
H3C OH 5
7 2 3
4
CH3 CH3
O
13
14 1 2
CH3
O 1,5,11-Trimethyl-8-(1methylethyl)-15oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca2,6,10-trien-5-ol,
CH3
9 12 11 10 3
4
5
CH3
6
8 7
CH3
H3C
CH3
H3C
10 11
OH HO
12
8
5
7 2
1
OH
3
4
CH3
CH3
O
8-Hydroxy-4,8,14-trimethyl-11-(1methylethyl)-15oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9dien-6-one
9 O
6
1,5,11-Trimethyl-8-(1methylethyl)-15oxabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-2,6diene-5,12-diol,
Figure X-1 Cembranoid ethers identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke.
Table X-1 Tobacco and/or Smoke Ethers Used in Flavor Formulations Identified In CAS No.
Chemical Abstracts Nomenclature
As Listed by Doull et al. (1053)
120-14-9 121-32-4 10031-82-0 121-33-5 123-11-5 151-10-0 150-78-7 104-46-1 1076-56-8 105-13-5 104-21-2 104-93-8 104-45-0 623-15-4 100-06-1 1193-79-9 611-13-2 93-18-5 470-82-6 91-10-1 7786-61-0 123-07-9 90-05-1 93-51-6 122-84-9
Benzaldehyde, 3,4-dimethoxy-; Benzaldehyde, 3-ethoxy-4-hydroxyBenzaldehyde, 4-ethoxyBenzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyBenzaldehyde, 4-methoxy Benzene, 1,3-dimethoxyBenzene, 1,4-dimethoxyBenzene, 1-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)Benzene, 3-methoxy-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxyBenzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, acetate Benzene, 1-methoxy-4-methylBenzene, 1-methoxy-4-propyl3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2-furanyl)Ethanone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl 5-methyl)2-Furancarboxylic acid, methyl ester Naphthalene, 2-ethoxy2-Oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, 1,3,3-trimethylPhenol, 2,6-dimethoxyPhenol, 4-ethenyl-2-methoxyPhenol, 4-ethylPhenol, 2-methoxyPhenol, 2-methoxy-4-methyl2-Propanone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
veratraldehyde ethylvanillin p-ethoxybenzaldehyde vanillin p-methoxybenzaldehyde m-dimethoxybenzene p-dimethoxybenzene anethole 4-isopropyl-3-methoxy-1-methylbenzene anisyl alcohol anisyl acetate p-methylanisole dihydroanethole 4-(2-furyl)-3-buten-2-one acetanisole 2-acetyl-5-methylfuran methyl 2-furoate β-naphthyl ethyl ether eucalyptol 2,6-dimethoxyphenol 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol p-ethylphenol guaiacol 2-methoxy-4-methylphenol 1-(p-methoxyphenyl)-2-propanone
a b
Smoke
Tobacco
Ia + Hb + + I
I + H + + I
+ ‑ ‑ + + H + + + + ‑ + + + + + + I
+ + + + ‑ ‑ + + + + + + + + + + + ‑
I = compound is an isomer of an identified component H = compound is a homolog of an identified component
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 556
11/13/08 5:25:00 PM
557
The Ethers
Table X-2 Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 557
11/13/08 5:25:01 PM
558
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 558
11/13/08 5:25:02 PM
The Ethers
559
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 559
11/13/08 5:25:03 PM
560
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 560
11/13/08 5:25:05 PM
The Ethers
561
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 561
11/13/08 5:25:07 PM
562
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 562
11/13/08 5:25:08 PM
The Ethers
563
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 563
11/13/08 5:25:16 PM
564
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 564
11/13/08 5:25:18 PM
The Ethers
565
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 565
11/13/08 5:25:19 PM
566
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 566
11/13/08 5:25:23 PM
The Ethers
567
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 567
11/13/08 5:25:24 PM
568
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 568
11/13/08 5:25:27 PM
The Ethers
569
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 569
11/13/08 5:25:28 PM
570
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 570
11/13/08 5:25:32 PM
The Ethers
571
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 571
11/13/08 5:25:33 PM
572
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 572
11/13/08 5:25:37 PM
The Ethers
573
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 573
11/13/08 5:25:38 PM
574
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 574
11/13/08 5:25:41 PM
The Ethers
575
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 575
11/13/08 5:25:42 PM
576
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 576
11/13/08 5:25:46 PM
The Ethers
577
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 577
11/13/08 5:25:47 PM
578
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 578
11/13/08 5:25:50 PM
The Ethers
579
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 579
11/13/08 5:25:52 PM
580
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 580
11/13/08 5:25:55 PM
The Ethers
581
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 581
11/13/08 5:25:56 PM
582
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 582
11/13/08 5:26:00 PM
The Ethers
583
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 583
11/13/08 5:26:01 PM
584
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 584
11/13/08 5:26:04 PM
The Ethers
585
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 585
11/13/08 5:26:06 PM
586
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 586
11/13/08 5:26:09 PM
The Ethers
587
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 587
11/13/08 5:26:10 PM
588
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 588
11/13/08 5:26:14 PM
The Ethers
589
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 589
11/13/08 5:26:15 PM
590
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 590
11/13/08 5:26:18 PM
The Ethers
591
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 591
11/13/08 5:26:19 PM
592
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 592
11/13/08 5:26:22 PM
The Ethers
593
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 593
11/13/08 5:26:24 PM
594
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 594
11/13/08 5:26:27 PM
The Ethers
595
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 595
11/13/08 5:26:28 PM
596
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 596
11/13/08 5:26:32 PM
The Ethers
597
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 597
11/13/08 5:26:33 PM
598
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 598
11/13/08 5:26:36 PM
The Ethers
599
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 599
11/13/08 5:26:37 PM
600
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 600
11/13/08 5:26:41 PM
The Ethers
601
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 601
11/13/08 5:26:42 PM
602
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 602
11/13/08 5:26:46 PM
The Ethers
603
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 603
11/13/08 5:26:53 PM
604
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 604
11/13/08 5:26:55 PM
The Ethers
605
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 605
11/13/08 5:26:56 PM
606
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 606
11/13/08 5:27:00 PM
The Ethers
607
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 607
11/13/08 5:27:01 PM
608
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 608
11/13/08 5:27:04 PM
The Ethers
609
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 609
11/13/08 5:27:05 PM
610
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 610
11/13/08 5:27:09 PM
The Ethers
611
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 611
11/13/08 5:27:10 PM
612
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 612
11/13/08 5:27:13 PM
The Ethers
613
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 613
11/13/08 5:27:14 PM
614
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table X-2 (Continued) Ethers in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Table X-3 Distribution of Identified Oxygen-Containing Components between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component Alcohols Phytosterols and derivatives Aldehydes Ketones Carboxylic acids Amino acids Esters Lactones Anhydrides Carbohydrates Phenols Quinones Ethers Totals a
Table Table II.A-5 Table II.B-2 Table III-12 Table III-13 Table IV.A-3 Table IV.B-7 Table V-3 Table VI-2 Table VII-1 Table VIII-3 Table IX.A-22 Table IX.B-2 Table X-2
Totala
Smoke
Tobacco
Smoke and Tobacco
1462 111 263 1090 745 103 1030 304 20 279 558 48 992
531 44 143 656 354 30 617 162 13 35 444 33 506
1152 102 199 647 614 102 924 201 13 271 244 21 659
221 35 79 213 223 29 511 59 6 27 130 6 173
7005
3568
5149
1712
olyfunctional O-containing compounds are counted in each functional group, e.g., propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy- (lactic P acid) appears in the alcohol catalog and the acid catalog; benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- (vanillic acid) appears in the acid catalog, the phenol catalog, and the ether catalog.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C010.indd 614
11/13/08 5:27:15 PM
11
Nitriles
The nitriles in tobacco and tobacco smoke provide another excellent example of the escalation of the number of identified components. From the listing in 1954 by Kosak (2170) who recorded only the simplest nitrile, that is, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), in tobacco smoke to those cataloged in Table XI-2 which includes the simplest “nitrile,” hydrocyanic acid (HCN) plus 140 nitriles identified to date in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. HCN was first identified in tobacco smoke in 1828 by Vogler (4062). Examination of Table XI-2 indicates the listing of seven partially identified nitrile isomers plus thirteen cyano group-containing pesticides used in tobacco agronomy. In the latter case, many were identified in tobacco only but several identified in tobacco were also found to transfer intact to smoke, for example, Cypermethrin® (52315-07-8). In their 1959 review of tobacco and tobacco smoke components, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed the following four components containing a –C≡N group: hydrogen cyanide, cyanogen, thiocyanic acid, and thiocyanogen. No alkyl nitriles were listed. With the advent of gas chromatography, Grob used his gas chromatographic knowledge and skill to identify a series of nitriles in tobacco smoke in 1962 (1413) and 1965 (1416, 1417). His 1965 findings were accompanied by similar findings reported in 1965 by Newsome et al. (2782). Many of the nitriles identified in their studies were discussed by Wynder and Hoffmann in their 1967 book [see pp. 450–451 in (4332)]. They also discussed the reports by Campbell et al. (582) and McKee et al. (2519b) on the indication that acetonitrile in the body fluids was indicative of exposure to tobacco smoke because no other respiratory exposure was known. Table XI-1 lists some of the nitriles identified in the early 1960s. In his 1968 review on tobacco and tobacco smoke composition, Stedman (3797) listed fifteen nitriles, including HCN, as chemical components of tobacco smoke. Many of the nitriles listed were those identified by Grob (1412, 1413, 1416, 1416a, 1419) in his gas chromatographic studies of tobacco smoke. Stedman also listed 2-pyridinecarbonitrile and 3-pyridinecarbonitrile (nicotinonitrile) as pyrolysis products of various alkaloids. In addition to HCN, cyanogen, thiocyanic acid, and thiocyanogen, Schmeltz and Hoffmann, in their 1977 review of N-containing components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, listed thirty-one nitriles [see Table IX in (3491)]. Ishiguro and Sugawara, in their 1980 catalog (1884) of the chemical
components of tobacco smoke, listed thirty nitriles in addition to HCN, cyanogen, thiocyanogen, and thiocyanic acid. In its 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) wrote very little about nitriles in tobacco smoke. IARC categorized HCN as one of the most toxic agents in the vapor phase of tobacco smoke and noted its presence in smoke was dependent on the level of nitrate, proteins, and amino acids in tobacco [see p. 96 in (1870)]. IARC also listed cyanogen as a tobacco smoke component. In its summary of its evaluation for carcinogenicity of chemical components identified in tobacco smoke, IARC did classify 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) with sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity in animals but limited evidence in humans [see p. 392 in (1870)]. The per cigarette MSS yield of 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) was listed at 3.2 to 15 μg, based on data provided by Wynder and Hoffmann from their 1982 publication (4348a). In a publication issued shortly after the IARC 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking, Hoffmann and Wynder estimated the number of tobacco smoke components to be approximately 3900, of which the number of nitriles was listed at 105 [see Table 1 in (1808)]. They listed HCN as a major toxic agent in nonfiltered cigarette smoke [see Table 2 in (1808)] and 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) as a biologically active agent in MSS [see Table 13 in (1808)]. It is interesting to note that despite the considerable contribution of Wynder and Hoffmann to the subject of smoke components and their biological properties in the IARC 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking that only HCN, cyanogen, and 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) of the 105 nitriles noted by Hoffmann and Wynder (1808) appeared in the IARC monograph (1870). In many of the publications issued between 1990 and 2001 in which various tumorigens in tobacco smoke, particularly cigarette smoke, were listed, 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) was included [Hoffmann and co-authors (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1783), Fowles and Bates (1217), OSHA (2825)]. In 2003, these lists were discussed in detail by Rodgman (3265). HCN and cyanogen, while not listed as tumorigens, were listed in many instances as biologically active toxicants. In many cases, acetonitrile was listed as a vapor-phase component of tobacco smoke. For example, in their 1997 and 2001 articles, Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1743) and Hoffmann et al. (1744) listed HCN, acetonitrile, 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile), and ten unnamed nitriles as
615
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 615
11/13/08 5:28:29 PM
616
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XI-1 Nitriles Identified and/or Discussed in Tobacco Smoke by the Mid-1960s CAS No.
Nitrile
75-05-8 140-29-4 100-47-0 109-74-0 625-28-5 4786-20-3 628-73-9 107-12-0 78-82-0 107-13-1 126-98-7 110-59-8 542-54-1 100-54-9
Acetonitrile Benzeneacetonitrile {α-tolunitrile} Benzonitrile Butanenitrile Butanenitrile, 3-methyl- {isovaleronitrile} 2-Butenenitrile {crotononitrile} Hexanenitrile {capronitrile} Propanenitrile Propanenitrile, 2-methyl- {isobutyronitrile} 2-Propenenitrile {acrylonitrile} 2-Propenenitrile, 2-methyl- {methacrylonitrile} Pentanenitrile {valeronitrile} Pentanenitrile, 4-methyl- {isocapronitrile} 3-Pyridinecarbonitrile {nicotinonitrile}
References by Mid-1960s Grob (1413, 1416), Newsome et al. (2782), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Grob (1427) Grob (1426) Grob (1416, 1417, 1422), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) Grob (1416, 1417), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) Newsome et al. (2782), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) Grob (1416, 1417, 1422), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) Grob (1413, 1416, 1422), Newsome et al. (2782), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Grob (1413, 1416, 1422), Newsome et al. (2782), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Grob (1413, 1416, 1422), Newsome et al. (2782), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Grob (1413, 1416, 1422), Newsome et al. (2782), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Grob (1416, 1417, 1422), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) Grob (1416, 1417), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) Grob (1426)
cigarette MSS vapor-phase components but they listed only 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) as a carcinogen. HCN was listed as a major toxic agent in cigarette smoke in their 2001 article (1743). Because of its inclusion in so many of the Hoffmann coauthored lists, 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) was among the forty or so smoke components that subsequently became classified as a “Hoffmann analyte.” While it did not use the term “Hoffmann analyte” in its 2000 report, the Department of Health (Canada) proposed that analytical data on over forty components from tobacco smoke should be a requirement
to enable the department to assess the health hazard of a cigarette product marketed in Canada (11A01). In its list, the Department of Health (Canada) included 2-propenenitrile (acrylonitrile) and HCN. Examination of the Department of Health (Canada) list reveals that most of its components appear in the biologically active component lists in the publications co-authored by Hoffmann (1727, 1773, 1808, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744). Table XI-2 lists the 141 nitriles identified to date in tobacco products. Of the 141, 131 have been identified in smoke, 23 in tobacco, and 13 in both.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 616
11/13/08 5:28:30 PM
617
Nitriles
Table XI-2 Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 617
11/13/08 5:28:31 PM
618
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 618
11/13/08 5:28:32 PM
Nitriles
619
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 619
11/13/08 5:28:34 PM
620
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco,Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 620
11/13/08 5:28:35 PM
Nitriles
621
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 621
11/13/08 5:28:37 PM
622
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 622
11/13/08 5:28:40 PM
Nitriles
623
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 623
11/13/08 5:28:42 PM
624
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 624
11/13/08 5:28:44 PM
Nitriles
625
Table XI-2 (CONTINUED) Nitriles in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C011.indd 625
11/13/08 5:28:45 PM
12
Acyclic Amines
The great diversity and number of the N-containing components in tobacco and tobacco smoke make it difficult to categorize them and catalog the members in each category. Examination of past reviews indicates that their authors had the same problems even when the numbers of components in the various categories were much fewer than they are now. The categorization used herein is an attempt to present a simplified but complete system for the reader. Because of its nature, tobacco and its smoke contain a multitude of N-containing components distributed among various categories. The simplest categories, of course, are the nitriles and the acyclic or aliphatic amines. The latter category also includes individual amino acids and their complexes (proteins, polypeptides), many of which possess a nonsubstituted amino group. More complex are the pentacyclic and hexacyclic N-containing components plus those that are combinations of more than one of each type, that is, linked pentacyclic structures (porphyrin), linked hexacyclic structures (2,3′-bipyridine), or a linked pentacyclic and hexacyclic structure [3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)pyridine (nicotine)]. Even more complex are those structures in which two or more cyclic units are fused with at least one containing N in its cycle, that is, the aza-arenes. Also pertinent to tobacco smoke chemistry are the components possessing a combination of an amino group with an aza-arene structure such as occurs in the N-heterocyclic amines. All categories mentioned, except the amino acids, include components comprising carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. However, several other categories, like the amino acids and the N-nitrosamines, include oxygen in the molecule, for example, the amides {I}, imides {II}, and lactams {III} (Figure XII-1). Herein, the amines will be discussed and cataloged. Subsequently, the other categories mentioned will be discussed and cataloged, that is, amides, imides, and lactams, components with five-membered N-containing rings, six-membered N-containing rings, and combinations of them, the aza-arenes, and the N-heterocyclic amines. The amino acids were discussed and cataloged previously. Other components, similar to the N-heterocyclic amines in which an amino group is attached to a fused N-containing system, have been identified in tobacco and/or smoke, for example, 1H-purin-6-amine (adenine). Because of the multitude of nicotine-related alkaloids, amino acids, and proteins in tobacco, diligent research eventually led to the identification of a host of alkyl amines in tobacco and smoke. In addition to ammonia, the only alkylamine listed as a tobacco smoke component in 1954 by Kosak (2170) was methylamine, but he questioned its identification even though he cited the 1904 report by Thoms (3912) and the 1930 report by Koperina (2161) on its identification.
A similar Koperina report (2162) appeared in a 1931 monograph edited by Shmuk on tobacco research (3655c). In their 1959 review, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed ammonia and trimethylamine as identified tobacco and smoke components and methylamine, dimethylamine, and ethylamine as identified tobacco smoke components. Nearly a decade later, in addition to the amino acids, Stedman listed over forty components with either a free or substituted amino group [see Table XI in (3797)]. In their 1977 tabulations of aliphatic and aromatic amines, Schmeltz and Hoffmann listed nearly eighty components almost equally divided between aliphatic and aromatic amines [see Tables I and II in (3491)]. Many of those they listed were identified in tobacco in the late 1960s by Irvine and Saxby (1877) and in tobacco smoke by Pailer et al. (2882, 2883, 2889). Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) had a few more amines than those listed in the Schmeltz-Hoffmann compilation because they included as aliphatic amines several cyclic amines and their alkyl derivatives, such as pyrrolidine and piperidine. However, this need not be considered a discrepancy. Examination of the structures of N-ethylethanamine (diethylamine) {IV} vs. pyrrolidine {V} or N-(1-methylethyl)-2propanamine {VI} vs. 2,5-dimethylpyrrolidine {VII} reveals the structural similarities (Figure XII-2). While Tso (3973) in his 1990 book listed numerous nicotine alkaloid-related amines as identified tobacco components, his list also included ammonia but very few alkylamines and no aromatic aniline-related amines in tobacco [see Table 27-1, Part IV in (3973)]. In addition to the simplest amine of all, ammonia, included in Table XII-1 for the sake of completeness are hydroxylamine and hydrazine and several alkylhydrazine derivatives. The source of many of the amines, including the alkylamines in tobacco and/or its smoke, is the disintegration of various proteins, individual amino acids, and nicotine-related alkaloids (2001, 3477, 4275a) during tobacco growth or the smoking process (3972). Obviously, a portion of those amines identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke occur in the smoke because of their transfer from the tobacco during the smoking process. The various benzenamine (aniline)-related components in tobacco are considered to arise from enzymatic or microbial disintegration of the amino acids phenylalanine or tyrosine (3491). Schmeltz et al. (3499) reported that the benzenamine-related amines were not generated from nicotine during the tobacco smoking process. In its 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [see pp. 107–109 in (1870)] noted that about 200 amines had been identified in tobacco smoke, based on its citation of the
627
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 627
11/24/08 12:24:30 PM
628
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
R
R1 N
O
O
N R
R2 I
O
N R
O
III
II
Figure XII-1 Oxygenated N-containing components of tobacco and tobacco smoke.
N H IV Ethanamine, N-ethyl109-89-7
N H V Pyrrolidine 123-75-1
N H VI 2-Propanamine, N-(1methylethyl)108-18-9
N H VII Pyrrolidine, 2,5-dimethyl3378-71-0
Figure XII-2 Structural similarities of alkylamines and pyrrolidines.
1977 review by Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), the 1982 review by Dube and Green (1067), and the report by Heckman and Best (1587). IARC described the per cigarette smoke yield of several alkylamines, noting that the most plentiful was methylamine. Citing the data presented by Patrianakos and Hoffmann (2900), IARC also discussed the per cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke yields of several aromatic amines including eleven benzenamines, the 1-and 2-naphthalenamines, and the [1,1’-biphenyl]-2-, 3-, and 4-amines (the aminobiphenyls). IARC noted that it had previously evaluated the carcinogenicity of several tobacco smoke aromatic amines, namely, 1- and 2-naphthalenamine, [1,1’-biphenyl]4-amine, benzenamine (aniline), 2-methylbenzenamine
(o-toluidine), N-phenyl-2-naphthalenamine, and 2-methoxybenzeneamine (o-anisidine). Table XII-1 summarizes the IARC categorization of several amines, including hydrazine and 1,1-dimethylhydrazine, identified in tobacco smoke [see Appendix 2 in (1870)]. The IARC monograph (1870) is based on the findings of its 1985 Working Group. Despite its review of the literature to 1985, the IARC had no comment about the numerous reports (1835a, 2491a, 2492, 2849, 2849a, 2949b, 3829a, 3862b, 3862c, 3862d, 3865b, 4365a, 4388) issued from 1975 to 1985 on the isolation initially from cooked food and subsequently from tobacco smoke of the tumorigenic and highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines.
Table XII-1 IARC Evaluation of Carcinogenicity of Various Aromatic Amines in Tobacco Smoke (1870) Degree of Evidence in CAS No.
Amine
62-53-3 95-53-4
302-01-2 57-14-7 134-32-7 91-59-8
Benzenamine {aniline} Benzenamine, 2-methyl {o-toluidine; 2-toluidine} Benzenamine, 4-methoxy- {p-anisidine} [1,1’-Biphenyl]-4-amine {4-aminobiphenyl} Hydrazine Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethyl1-Naphthalenamine 2-Naphthalenamine
135-88-6
2-Naphthalenamine, N-phenyl-
104-94-9 92-67-1
Yield, ng/cig
Animals
102, 364 a 30-337b 32, 162a present 2-5.6 c 2.4, 4.6 a 24-43 b present b 4.3, 2.5 a 1-334 b 1.0, 1.7 a present
Limited evidence
—
Humans
Sufficient evidence Sufficient evidence Sufficient evidence
Inadequate evidence — Sufficient evidence
Sufficient evidence Sufficient evidence Inadequate evidence Sufficient evidence
Inadequate evidence — Inadequate evidence Inadequate evidence
Inadequate evidence
Inadequate evidence
a
Data cited by IARC (1870) from Patrianakos and Hoffmann (2900); first value is for a U.S. 85-mm non-filtered cigarette, second value is for a French 70-mm non-filtered cigarette.
b
Data cited by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741, 1743, 1744).
c
Data cited by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743, 1744).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 628
11/24/08 12:24:31 PM
629
Acyclic Amines
There are several interesting aspects to the 1984 American Chemical Society monograph on chemical carcinogens edited by Searle (3568): • Despite a voluminous review by Dipple et al. (983) on PAHs and the tumorigenicity of many of them, no mention was made of a tumorigenic or carcinogenic PAH in tobacco smoke. • The only significantly tumorigenic, carcinogenic, or biologically active tobacco and tobacco smoke components discussed in the 1400-page monograph were the N-nitrosamines [see pp. 839–844 in Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990)]. Much of the data cited by Dipple et al. were those previously presented by Hoffmann and his colleagues (514, 1680, 1685). • In two chapters on the tumorigenicity of aromatic amines, neither Garner et al. (1275a) nor Parkes and Evans (12A02) mention the presence in tobacco smoke of the aromatic amines categorized as significant tumorigens or carcinogens, namely, 2-naphthalenamine, [1,1’-biphenyl]-4-amine, and 2-methylbenzenamine (o-toluene). Garner et al. [see Table I in (1275a)] tabulated the tumorigenicity results of studies on many substituted benzenamines (anilines). The data indicated that several appeared to be as tumorigenic as or even more tumorigenic than 2-methylbenzenamine (o-toluidine), a tobacco smoke component listed as a significant tumorigen (1217, 1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808, 2825). Each of them has been identified as a tobacco smoke component, for example, 3-methylbenzeneamine (m-toluidine), 4-methylbenzeneamine (p-toluidine), and 2,4,6-trimethylbenzenamine (mesitylamine), but none was listed as a significant tumorigen. • Despite the number of reports issued after 1975 on N-heterocyclic amines, Garner et al. (1275a) did not mention their presence in tobacco smoke. They commented, “A multitude of new aromatic amine or heterocyclic amino compounds will most
likely be discovered in the foreseeable future, such as those found in cooked foods” [Yamazoe et al. (4370a), Takeda et al. (12A03)]. Several of the components listed in Table XII-1 have been included in many of the lists of carcinogens, tumorigens, or biologically active components in cigarette smoke presented by Fowles and Bates (1217), Hoffmann and colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808), and OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) (2825). Based on these lists, the per cigarette yields proposed by some authorities, such as the Department of Health (Canada) (12A01), to be determined of the “Hoffmann analytes” among the amines include 1-naphthalenamine, 2-naphthalenamine, [1,1’-biphenyl]-3-amine, [1,1’-biphenyl]-4-amine, 2-methylbenzenamine (o-toluidine), and ammonia. The primary goal in Table XII-2 is the listing of those tobacco and/or smoke components that are acyclic amines. In some cases, an amino group, either unsubstituted (-NH2) or substituted {VIII}, may be linked to a cyclic N-containing structure, -N
R1 R
2 VIII
for example, 2-pyridinamine, 2-amino-1,7-dihydro-6H-purin-6 -one (guanine), but the reason for inclusion of the component in Table XII-2 is that part of the molecule is an acyclic amine. For the sake of completeness, several components have been included in Table XII-2 because they possess the amine function (-NH 2) but are not linked to a carbon atom, for example, ammonia, hydrazine, and hydroxylamine. None of them fits the definition of an amide, imide, or lactam. Other components included in Table XII-2 for the sake of completeness are the amino acids with acyclic unsubstituted or substituted amine groups, the acyclic N-nitrosamines, and the N-heterocyclic amines. With the inclusion in Table XII-2 of the various items just mentioned, the number of acyclic amines and their derivatives total 469, with 259 identified in smoke, 316 in tobacco, and 106 in both tobacco and smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 629
11/24/08 12:24:31 PM
630
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 630
11/24/08 12:24:31 PM
Acyclic Amines
631
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 631
11/24/08 12:24:31 PM
632
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 632
11/24/08 12:24:32 PM
Acyclic Amines
633
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 633
11/24/08 12:24:33 PM
634
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 634
11/24/08 12:24:34 PM
Acyclic Amines
635
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 635
11/24/08 12:24:35 PM
636
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 636
11/24/08 12:24:36 PM
Acyclic Amines
637
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 637
11/24/08 12:24:37 PM
638
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 638
11/24/08 12:24:38 PM
Acyclic Amines
639
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 639
11/24/08 12:24:39 PM
640
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 640
11/24/08 12:24:40 PM
Acyclic Amines
641
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 641
11/24/08 12:24:41 PM
642
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 642
11/24/08 12:24:42 PM
Acyclic Amines
643
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 643
11/24/08 12:24:43 PM
644
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 644
11/24/08 12:24:43 PM
Acyclic Amines
645
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 645
11/24/08 12:24:45 PM
646
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 646
11/24/08 12:24:45 PM
Acyclic Amines
647
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 647
11/24/08 12:24:46 PM
648
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 648
11/24/08 12:24:47 PM
Acyclic Amines
649
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 649
11/24/08 12:24:48 PM
650
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 650
11/24/08 12:24:49 PM
Acyclic Amines
651
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 651
11/24/08 12:24:50 PM
652
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 652
11/24/08 12:24:51 PM
Acyclic Amines
653
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 653
11/24/08 12:24:52 PM
654
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 654
11/24/08 12:24:53 PM
Acyclic Amines
655
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 655
11/24/08 12:24:54 PM
656
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 656
11/24/08 12:24:55 PM
Acyclic Amines
657
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 657
11/24/08 12:24:56 PM
658
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 658
11/24/08 12:24:57 PM
Acyclic Amines
659
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 659
11/24/08 12:24:58 PM
660
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 660
11/24/08 12:24:59 PM
Acyclic Amines
661
Table XII-2 (continued) Amines Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C012.indd 661
11/24/08 12:25:00 PM
13
Amides
In his 1954 compilation of smoke components, Kosak (2170) listed no amide identified to that date. In their 1959 review of tobacco and tobacco smoke components, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) described the identification of asparagine and glutamine in tobacco and glutamine and nicotinamide in tobacco smoke. The latter were identified in smoke by Buyske et al. (562). In its 1963 monograph on tobacco and smoke components, Philip Morris (2939) listed the amides, asparagine, glutamine, citrulline, and nicotinamide, as tobacco components but only glutamine and nicotinamide as smoke components. Stedman (3797) in his 1968 review of tobacco and smoke components listed asparagine, citrulline, and glutamine as amino-acid related components, not as amides [see Table XIV in (3797)]. Nicotinamide and N-methylnicotinamide were not listed specifically as amides but as alkaloid derivatives [see Table XI in (3797)]. Cotinine was also listed in the same table. Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) in their 1980 monograph on tobacco smoke components listed a total of seventy-two amides, imides, and lactams (forty-nine amides, seven imides, sixteen lactams) [see Table I-15 in (1884)]. The reference for all but two of the compounds listed (formamide, urethane) was Schumacher et al. (3553). Several amides, imides, and lactams were listed by Ishiguro and Sugawara in other tables, for example, asparagine and glutamine under amino acids [Table I-19 in (1884)], cotinine and norcotinine under alkaloids, caffeine under N-polycyclics (excluding alkaloids). Citing publications by Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), Schumacher et al. (3553), and Heckman and Best (1587), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in its 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking stated [see p. 109 in (1870)] that there was a large spectrum of amides, imides, and lactams in tobacco smoke (including some fifty aliphatic amides). While the IARC commented on the Johnston et al. 1973 report on the per cigarette yields of formamide, acetamide, and propanamide, it did not mention that Johnston et al., in their 1973 report (1965), had noted that only three amides, glutamine, asparagine, and nicotinamide, had been identified in tobacco smoke at that time. The IARC expressed concern about the twenty-four secondary amides identified in smoke, particularly N-methylformamide, N-methylacetamide, N-methylpropanamide, and N-methylnicotinamide, because of their propensity to generate tumorigenic nitrosamides. Despite the fact that these secondary amides have been identified in tobacco smoke and are known to readily form N-nitrosamides, no such N-nitroso compound has been identified to date in tobacco smoke [Rodgman and Green (3300)].
IARC also mentioned the two lactams N-methyl-2pyrrolidone and N-methyl-2-piperidone and the urethanes, but made no textual comment about their biological effect. Of the fifty-three amides identified in tobacco smoke by Schumacher et al. (3553), thirty-two were new to tobacco smoke composition. Their contribution in this regard was the result of the use of an analytical technology that permitted the fractionation and identification of many components in the water-soluble portion of cigarette smoke condensate. In his study of the composition of smoke from an allburley tobacco cigarette, Heckman (1586) identified sixteen amides, ranging in complexity from acetamide to N′-formylnornicotine. Although 186 amides are cataloged in Table XIII-1, it should be realized that the number of amides in tobacco far exceed the number of amides listed for tobacco and tobacco smoke. Each of the many thousands of enzymes, proteins, and proteinaceous components in tobacco possesses many amido linkages. Nearly 500 of the well-characterized enzymes and proteins are cataloged in Table XXII-2 in Chapter XXII, but that number is only a small fraction of the great number of such components in tobacco. IARC had little to say about the possible ill effects of any of the amides in tobacco smoke. However, it did note in an appendix to its monograph [Appendix 2, pp. 389–394 in (1870)] that sufficient evidence existed for the initiating and cocarcinogenic activity in animals of urethane (ethyl carbamate) and the evidence was limited for acetamide. IARC listed the per cigarette yields of acetamide and urethane. In the first listing of tumorigens, carcinogens, and toxicants in tobacco smoke, by Hoffmann and Wynder in 1986 (1808), only urethane was included. Urethane was included in several subsequent lists, those by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), Hoffmann et al. (1773), and Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740). In their 1997 list (1740), Hoffmann and Hoffmann added acrylamide (2-propenamide) as present in cigarette smoke but no per cigarette yield was included. In their next three lists of tumorigens, carcinogens, and toxicants in tobacco smoke issued between 1998 and 2001, Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741, 1743, 1744) listed per cigarette yields of acetamide and urethane and the presence of acrylamide. Other listings of tumorigens, carcinogens, and toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) (2825) in 1994 and Fowles and Bates (1217) in 2001 included urethane but not acetamide or acrylamide. The various degrees of inclusion in the many lists issued between 1986 and 2001 were summarized by Rodgman (3265).
663
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 663
11/13/08 5:31:16 PM
664
Acetamide, acrylamide, and urethane were not included in most of the requirements for “Hoffmann analyte” data as an indication of cigarette smoke hazard, for example, the Department of Health (Canada) proposal in 2000 (25A06). One other aspect of interest concerning amides is that several (asparagine, glutamine, and urea) appear on the Doull et al. list of individual compounds used in cigarette manufacture by U.S. companies (1053). The Doull et al. list also includes the imide 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl-1H-purine-2, 6-dione (caffeine). Although they are on the borderline of the definition of an amide, urethane plus urea and several of its derivatives have been included in Table XIII-1. Because each possesses structure I, each was included as an amide for the sake of completeness, for example, urea is H2N-CO-NH2 and ethyl
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
urethane is H2N-COO-C2H5. Several of the urea derivatives are compounds used in tobacco agronomy. H N O I
R1
R2
The number of compounds in Table XIII-1 totals 212, of which 191 are amides. The remaining components include urethane plus urea and several of its derivatives. Of the 212 compounds, 127 were identified in tobacco, 118 in tobacco smoke, and 33 were identified in both tobacco and smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 664
11/13/08 5:31:17 PM
Amides
665
Table XIII-1 Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 665
11/13/08 5:31:19 PM
666
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 666
11/13/08 5:31:20 PM
Amides
667
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 667
11/13/08 5:31:21 PM
668
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 668
11/13/08 5:31:22 PM
Amides
669
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 669
11/13/08 5:31:24 PM
670
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 670
11/13/08 5:31:32 PM
Amides
671
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 671
11/13/08 5:31:33 PM
672
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 672
11/13/08 5:31:37 PM
Amides
673
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 673
11/13/08 5:31:40 PM
674
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 674
11/13/08 5:31:41 PM
Amides
675
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 675
11/13/08 5:31:44 PM
676
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 676
11/13/08 5:31:46 PM
Amides
677
Table XIII-1 (continued) Amides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C013.indd 677
11/13/08 5:31:49 PM
14
Imides et al., Newell et al. (2769) identified five imides. In his earlier study of the composition of smoke from an all-burley tobacco cigarette, Heckman (1586) identified fifteen imides. Examination of the structures of several of the CSC components indicates that the decision of their categorization is somewhat difficult. In Figure XIV-IA, representative structures for an amide, an imide, and a lactam are presented. To which of these categories—amide, imide, or lactam—should the smoke component 1-acetyl-3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-4-methyl2H-pyrrol-2-one {I} be assigned? Its structure is depicted in Figure XIV-IB. In Structure {II} of Figure XIV.B, the amide configuration is shown. Structures {III} and {IV} show the imide and lactam configurations, respectively. This same situation is present with several other smoke components. Although there may be some disagreement on the preciseness of our selection, for completeness sake such components are listed in each chapter in its major catalog table. As a result, the total number of components in each of the major catalog tables may be slightly inflated. In addition to several amides (asparagine, glutamine, urea), Doull et al. lists the imide 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl1H-purine-2,6-dione (caffeine) among individual compounds used in cigarette manufacture by U.S. companies (1053). The seventy-nine imides identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke are cataloged in Table XIV-1. Of the seventy-nine imides reported, thirty-nine have been identified in tobacco, fifty-nine in tobacco smoke, and nineteen in both tobacco and smoke.
In his 1954 compilation of tobacco smoke components, Kosak (2170) listed no imide identified in tobacco smoke to that date. Ishiguro and Sugawara, in their 1980 monograph on tobacco smoke components, listed a total of seventy-two amides, imides, and lactams, including seven imides [see Table I-15 in (1884)]. Their reference for all the imides listed was that of Schumacher et al. (3553). Ishiguro and Sugawara did not list caffeine as an imide but listed it under N-polycyclics (excluding alkaloids) [see Table I-14 in (1884)]. In its 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) stated that there was a large spectrum of amides, imides, and lactams in tobacco smoke (including some fifty aliphatic amides) [see p. 109 in (1870)]. The basis for the IARC comments were the 1977 review of N-containing components in tobacco and tobacco smoke by Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) and the smoke composition publication in 1977 of Schumacher et al. (3553) and in 1981 by Heckman and Best (1587). Of the twenty-four imides identified in tobacco smoke by Schumacher et al. (3553), six were new to tobacco smoke composition. Many of the previously identified imides were derivatives of 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (maleimide), 2,5-pyrrolidinedione (succinimide), and 1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione (phthalimide). The use of a recently developed analytical technology that permitted the fractionation and identification of components in the water-soluble portion of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) was a key factor in their mid-1977 study. In a detailed study of the ether-soluble portion from the same CSC studied by Schumacher R1
R2
N
N H
O
O
N H
O
R
O
Imide configuration
Amide configuration
Lactam configuration
Figure XIV-1A The amide, imide, and lactam configurations. H3C
C2H5
O
N O
H3C
CH3
C2H5
O
N O
H3C
CH3
C2H5
O
N H 3C
I II III 2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1-acetyl-3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-4-methyl(CAS No. 61892-80-6)
H3C
O
C2H5
N
O CH3
O IV
Figure XIV-1B The amide {II}, imide {III}, and lactam {IV} configurations in 1-acetyl-3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-4-methyl-2H-pyrrol-2-one {I}. 679
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 679
11/13/08 5:32:34 PM
680
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIV-1 Imides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 680
11/13/08 5:32:35 PM
Imides
681
Table XIV-1 (continued) Imides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 681
11/13/08 5:32:36 PM
682
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIV-1 (continued) Imides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 682
11/13/08 5:32:38 PM
Imides
683
Table XIV-1 (continued) Imides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 683
11/13/08 5:32:39 PM
684
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIV-1 (continued) Imides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 684
11/13/08 5:32:40 PM
Imides
685
Table XIV-1 (continued) Imides Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C014.indd 685
11/13/08 5:32:43 PM
15
N-Nitrosamines
The introduction to this chapter on N-nitrosamines (NNAs) in tobacco and tobacco smoke is a considerably abbreviated but updated version of the lengthy unpublished 1993 memorandum by Rodgman (3256). Omitted from this outline are several sections covered in detail in (3256). These include much of the discussion on the early studies of the biological properties of NNAs [see pp. 117–178 in (3256)] and studies on alternate sources of exposure to NNAs [see pp. 107–116 in (3257)]. The numerous publications during the past two decades on the identification, quantitation, and bioassay of NNAs, particularly those found in tobacco-related entities [tobacco, mainstream smoke (MSS), sidestream cigarette smoke (SSS), and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)] raise the question as to why this class of tobacco/tobacco smoke components has received such emphasis. Since the early 1950s, several classes of compounds in tobacco smoke have been proposed as prime contributors to cancer of the respiratory tract in smokers. The events that triggered detailed examination of the composition of cigarette MSS included:
1. The results of retrospective studies that were interpreted as indicating an association between cigarette smoking and carcinoma of the lung in smokers [Levin et al. (2355), Mills and Porter (2556), Schrek et al. (3529), Wynder and Graham (4306b), Doll and Hill (1027), McConnell et al. (2525), Sadowky et al. (3375a)]. Subsequently, the results from additional retrospective studies and several prospective studies on smoking and respiratory tract cancer bolstered the evidence for this association. 2. Bioassay results from studies (4306a, 4306c) in which carcinomas were produced in susceptible mouse strains at the site of repeated skin painting with massive doses of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) prepared in a manner supposedly simulating the human smoking process (the puff frequency used was a 2-sec puff each 20 sec vs. the usually accepted routine of a 2-sec puff each 60 sec). Between 1953 and late 1966, the major skin-painting studies involving CSC administered to various laboratory animal species numbered about sixty (4332).
Despite numerous statements to the contrary—that the data from mouse skin-painting experiments with CSC were not extrapolable from mouse skin to the human lung, some authorities continued to imply that such data were meaningful
in terms of respiratory tract cancer in smokers. For example, Wynder (4292) wrote: The mouse skin test cannot give definitive proof for a human carcinogen, although it has long been used as a reliable tool for testing of carcinogenic materials … The animal data must be considered, not as a proof for the human experience, but as a tool with which to work toward the isolation and identification of carcinogenic agent(s). At this time we can only assume, on the basis of the combined human and animal data, that these carcinogens are the same for man and for mice.
In 1956, Wynder (4295) stated: We believe that no animal data can be used to establish a causative role in cancer in man. Such proof can come only from human epidemiologic data … animal evidence by itself can never establish a human carcinogen nor can it ever disprove it … For example, if we suspect tobacco as a carcinogen to man, animal experimentation can determine the specific parts of tobacco which are carcinogenic to animals. Once identified, we can only assume that the specific carcinogens are the same to which man also responds and introduce preventive measures accordingly.
Despite comments such as these and additional ones in later publications, animal experimentation, particularly mouse skin-painting studies, constituted a substantial part of the bioassays on tobacco smoke. Such bioassays are not only expensive but also extremely time consuming (18 to 24 months). Because of the absence of a positive response in studies of tobacco smoke inhalation by laboratory animals, mouse skin-painting with CSC was selected as the bioassay of choice in the massive decade-long (1970–1980) study conducted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) on “less hazardous” cigarettes, a study that involved nearly 100 test cigarettes and 30 standard or reference cigarettes (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333, 2683). Successively after the late 1950s, various classes of smoke components were proposed as either the cause of (as tumor initiators) or contributors to (as promoters, cocarcinogens, ciliastats) lung cancer in smokers:
1. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) 2. Their polycyclic nitrogen analogs, the aza-arenes, reported to be carcinogenic to mouse skin 3. Low molecular weight phenols reported to be promoters of tumorigenic PAHs 4. Aldehydes and ketones reported to be ciliastatic in in vitro ciliated systems
687
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 687
11/13/08 7:14:48 PM
688
5. Aromatic amines 6. Metallic items (210Po, Ni) 7. Other miscellaneous compounds, such as ethyl urethan
One by one the claims for involvement of each of these classes of compounds were either discounted or seriously questioned [Rodgman (3255, 3257), Rodgman et al. (3307)]. PAHs were described as the only major tumor initiators in mouse skin carcinogenesis [Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)]: The many detailed data obtained in studies of tobacco carcinogenesis on mouse skin exclude with some certainty the major tumor initiators other than the PAH type play a role in this assay system.
Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), because of its potency in skintumor carcinogenesis and per cigarette MSS yield, was considered the major PAH of concern in tobacco smoke. In 1981, the Surgeon General commented on PAHs [see p. 36 in (4009)]: BaP appears to be the most important single member of this class of compounds, taking into consideration both its concentration and its relative carcinogenic potency.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
The failure of several groups of investigators [Candeli et al. (587), Kaburaki et al. (2006), Schmeltz et al. (3499, 3512), Snook (3733), Snook et al. (3750), Grimmer et al. (1409), Kamata et al. (2021), Sasaki and Moldoveanu (3414), Rustemeier et al. (3370)] to reproduce the findings of Van Duuren et al. (4027) on the presence and/or levels of the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h] acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in tobacco smoke was discussed by Rodgman [3255, 3260, see Table 4 in (3265)] and Baker (172). The failure to explain the observed tumorigenicity of CSC in the mouse-skin bioassay by consideration of the following tobacco smoke systems led to the inclusion of ciliastasis by various water-soluble vapor-phase (VP) tobacco smoke components in an attempt to explain the causation of respiratory tract cancer in smokers:
It was obvious that additional mechanisms were needed to explain the observed biological effect since (1) B[a]P in CSC acting alone accounted for less than 2% of the observed biological response in mouse skin-painting studies, (2) the total PAH fraction accounted for less than 3% of the observed biological response in mouse skin-painting studies, (3) no “supercarcinogenic” PAH was found in CSC (3756–3758, 4282), and (4) inclusion of tumorigenic aza-arenes in CSC explained very little more of the unexplained tumorigenicity. The first additional explanation of the observed effect in skin-painting studies with CSC involved the mechanisms of promotion and cocarcinogenesis of tobacco smoke components. The smoke components first classified as promoters were the low molecular weight phenols because of their known promotion of such potent tumorigenic PAHs as B[a]P and dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) (414). However, the significance of the promoting/cocarcinogenic effect of tobacco smoke phenols on PAH tumorigenicity [Wynder and Hoffmann (4309, 4317, 4344)] was offset by the following observations:
1. Removal of a substantial amount (70% to 85%) of the low molecular weight phenols from CSC by selective filtration of the MSS did “not change significantly the biological activity of the resulting condensate” [Wynder and Hoffmann, see p. 626 in (4332), Hecht et al., see p. 2 in presentation manuscript (1582, 1583)]. 2. Low molecular weight phenols inhibited the tumorigenicity of B[a]P [Van Duuren et al. (4029, 4035)].
3. Inclusion of known initiators, promoters, and cocarcinogens in tobacco smoke in the calculation of its tumorigenicity explained less than 5% of the observed biological effect in skin-painting studies.
1. The levels in CSC of mouse-skin tumorigenic PAHs, acting individually or in concert, could not account for the response in CSC-painted animals. 2. The CSC levels of mouse-skin tumorigenic PAHs plus the promoting/cocarcinogenic phenols, acting individually or in concert, could not account for the observed response in CSC-painted animals. 3. The CSC levels of mouse-skin tumorigenic PAHs plus promoting/cocarcinogenic phenols and nontumorigenic PAHs, acting individually or in concert, could not account for the observed response in CSC-painted animals. 4. Inclusion of tumorigenic aza-arenes in the calculation could not account for the observed biological response.
In fact, when the levels of the known tumorigenic, promoting, and cocarcinogenic components of tobacco smoke and their activity toward mouse skin are included in the assessment, less than 5% of the observed biological response in the CSC-painted animals can be explained! To circumvent this failure to explain the observations with CSC-treated laboratory animals and attempt to explain the epidemiological findings in human smokers, ciliastasis was introduced as an additional mechanism involved in the causation of smokers’ lung cancer. In a variety of in vitro systems, ciliastasis was produced by cigarette MSS VP and by individual MSS VP components (hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, phenol). It was proposed that ciliastasis occurred in the smokers’ respiratory tract and significantly diminished the lung clearance mechanism of the cilia, thus permitting tobacco smoke particulate-phase particles (and their included “tumorigens”) to remain on the lung surface and initiate the cellular changes required for tumor development. However, this proposal was seriously
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 688
11/13/08 7:14:49 PM
N-Nitrosamines
compromised by the demonstration in intact animals as well as in human smokers that a large proportion (60% to 75%) of the in vitro ciliastats (all water-soluble) in the inhaled smoke failed to reach the ciliated tissue in the respiratory tract because of solution in the aqueous secretions coating the oral cavity tissues [Rodgman et al. (3306), Dalhamn et al. (892, 893)]. Prior to the emphasis on NNAs, the class of tobacco smoke components subjected to the most study was the PAHs, with particular emphasis on the CSC compound considered the most potent, B[a]P. Although the NNAs identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke number fewer than sixty, the number of PAHs either identified or partially identified* exceeds 500 [Severson et al. (3619), Snook et al. (3756-3758), Rodgman and Perfetti (3306a)]. The role played by the PAHs, particularly B[a]P, in induction of skin carcinoma in skin-painted laboratory animals was seriously questioned because of the demonstrations by Roe (3310, 3311) that a 10-fold increase and by Lazar et al. (2320) that a 30-fold increase in the B[a]P level of CSC failed to produce an increase in its tumorigenicity to mouse skin. This lack of correlation between levels of PAHs [B[a] P, benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A)] in CSC and percent tumorbearing animals was demonstrated in the NCI “less hazardous” cigarette study [Gori (3329, 3230, 3232, 3233), National Cancer Institute (2683)]. The results were acknowledged in the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1981 report [see p. 36 in (4009)]: The contribution of BaP or PAH in general to mouse skin carcinogenesis by cigarette smoke condensate cannot be fully measured at this time. Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) found a correlation between BaP levels and carcinogenic activity of smoke condensates from several types of cigarettes. A much larger series of experimental cigarettes was studied in the smoking and health program of the National Cancer Institute. No significant dependence of carcinogenic potency on BaP was observed [Gori (3329, 3230, 3232, 3233), NCI (2683)].
It should be noted that in the NCI “less hazardous” cigarette study, neither the tobaccos used in the nearly 100 experimental cigarettes and thirty standard and reference cigarettes nor the MSSs generated from them were analyzed for NNAs. Despite observations that NNAs in CSC or NNAs individually induce few, if any, tumors at the application site in mouse skin-painting studies with CSC, they are one of the two classes of tobacco product components to which the prohealth forces continue to devote their major efforts. In 1990, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) noted: Mouse skin is particularly responsive to PAH tumorigenesis. It is not equally responsive to other important classes of carcinogens such as N-nitrosamines …
*
The partial identification of a PAH refers to the instances where the positions of alkyl substituents and/or their precise identity are uncertain, for example, a trimethyl vs. an ethylmethyl derivative.
689
As noted in 1984 by Hoffmann et al. (1696), three types of NNAs are formed in tobacco processing and during the tobacco smoking process: volatile N-nitrosamines (VNAs), tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs), and nonvolatile N-nitrosamines. The latter include N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) and N-nitrosoproline (NPRO). Recently, several N-nitrosamino acids were identified in tobacco. The major NNAs identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke are listed in Table XV-1. In the mid-1960s, Fredrickson (1236), using a laboratory procedure that precluded artifactual formation of NNAs, identified several volatile NNAs in cigarette MSS. He also reported that volatile NNAs, like the low molecular weight phenols, are selectively removed from MSS by plasticized (triacetin) cellulose acetate filters. Per cigarette MSS volatile NNA yields are reduced by 75% to 80% in this manner, a value similar to that observed with the selective filtration of low molecular weight phenols. This diminution of volatile NNA yields was confirmed several years later by Morie and Sloan (2635) and Brunnemann et al. (514). TSNAs, because of their low volatility, occur predominantly in the MSS particulate phase and behave similarly to other particulate-phase components such as the PAHs, that is, they are not selectively reduced by filtration with plasticized cellulose acetate. However, Hoffmann et al. (1685) noted that MSS TSNA yields are reduced by any technology designed to reduce the MSS particulate phase, such as increased filtration efficiency, increased air dilution (filter-tip perforation, paper porosity), and tobacco expansion. The precursors in tobacco of the NNAs in tobacco smoke have been studied extensively. Tobacco protein is reported by Brunnemann et al. (511) to be the major precursor of the volatile NNAs and N-nitrosoproline (NPRO). Based on these findings, Hoffmann et al. (1696) wrote: The protein fraction of tobacco appears to represent the major precursor group of the carcinogenic volatile nitrosamines in smoke. In addition, Tso et al. (3985) had previously reported that the volatile NNAs in smoke are proportional to the nitrate content of the tobacco filler, an observation also made by Morie and Sloan (2635).
Precursors of TSNAs in tobacco and smoke are nicotine, nornicotine, anabasine, and anatabine [Hecht et al. (1564), Adams et al. (29)]. Both nicotine and nornicotine are considered precursors of N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN). Direct transfer of TSNAs from tobacco to the smoke accounts for about 40% of NNN and 30% of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in MSS. The remainder of these two TSNAs in the MSS is formed during the smoking process [Hoffmann et al. (1734), Hecht et al. (1564)]. Like the levels of the volatile NNAs in MSS, the yields of the TSNAs in MSS are proportional to the nitrate content of the tobacco filler (3985). PAHs are ubiquitous. They are present in the atmosphere as components of a variety of dusts, soots, tars, oils, engine exhaust gases; in water; in many commonly consumed foodstuffs, particularly those that are heated, roasted, or broiled
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 689
11/13/08 7:14:49 PM
690
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-1 Major N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Chemical Name
Abbreviation
Common Name
Volatile N-nitrosamines 1-Butanamine, N-butyl-N-nitroso1-Butanamine, N-methyl-N-nitrosoEthanamine, N,1-dimethyl-N-nitrosoEthanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitrosoEthanamine, N-methyl-N-nitrosoMethanamine, N-methyl-N-nitrosoMorpholine, 4-nitrosoPiperidine, 1-nitrosoPropanal, 3-(methylnitrosamino)1-Propanamine, N,2-dimethyl-N-nitroso-
NDBA NBMA
N-nitrosodibutylamine N-nitrosobutylmethylamine N-nitrosoisopropylmethylamine N-nitrosodiethylamine N-nitrosoethylmethylamine N-nitrosodimethylamine N-nitrosomorpholine N-nitrosopiperidine 3-(methylnitrosamino)propionaldehyde N-nitrosoisobutylmethylamine; N-nitrosomethyl(2-methylpropyl)amine N-nitrosoethylisobutylamine; N-nitrosoethyl(2-methylpropyl)amine N-nitrosoethylpropylamine N-nitrosomethylpropylamine N-nitrosodipropylamine 3-(methylnitrosamino)propionitrile, N-nitrosopyrrolidine
NDEA NEMA NDMA NMOR NPIP
1-Propanamine, N-ethyl-2-methyl-N-nitroso1-Propanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitroso1-Propanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso 1-Propanamine, N-nitroso-N-propylPropionitrile, 3-(methylnitrosamino)Pyrrolidine, 1-nitroso-
NDPA NPYR
Nonvolatile N-nitrosamines Diethanolamine, N-nitroso2-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-
NDELA NPRO
N-nitrosodiethanolamine N-nitrosoproline; 2-pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-
NAT iso-NNAC NNAL iso-NNAL NNK NAB NNN
N’-nitrosoanatabine 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-butanal 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)- butanoic acid 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-butanol 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)- butanol 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-butanone N’-nitrosoanabasine N’-nitrosonornicotine
NSAR
N-nitrosarcosine; N-methyl-N-nitrosoglycine
NMBA
4-(methylnitrosamino)butanoic acid 4-(methylnitrosamino)butanoic acid, methyl ester 2,6-di-(methylnitrosamino)hexanoic acid 2,5-di-(methylnitrosamino)pentanoic acid 1-nitroso-2-piperidinecarboxylic acid 3-(methylnitrosamino)propanoic acid; N-methyl-N-nitroso-β-alanine 3-(methylnitrosamino)propanoic acid, methyl ester 2-(methylnitrosamino)-3-phenylpropanoic acid 1-nitroso-2-pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, methyl ester; N-nitrosoproline, methyl ester
Tobacco-Specific N-nitrosamines 2,3’-Bipyridine, 1-nitroso-1,2,3,6-tetrahydroButanal, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)Butanoic acid, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)1-Butanol, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)1-Butanol, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)1-Butanone, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)Pyridine, 3-(1-nitroso-2-piperidinyl)Pyridine, 3-(1-nitroso-2-pyrrolidinyl)N-Nitrosamino Acids, Esters, Nitriles Acetic acid, 2-(methylnitrosamino)Acetic acid, 2-(methylnitrosamino)-, methyl ester Butanoic acid, 4-(methylnitrosamino)Butanoic acid, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-, methyl ester Hexanoic acid, 2,6-di-(methylnitrosamino)Pentanoic acid, 2,5-di-(methylnitrosamino)2-Piperidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitrosoPropanoic acid, 3-(methylnitrosamino)-
NMPA
Propanoic acid, 3-(methylnitrosamino)-, methyl ester Propanoic acid, 2-(methylnitrosamino)-3-phenyl2-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-, methyl ester
[Rodgman (15A48), Grasso (1345), Maga (2438)] and in ETS. Similarly, exposure to NNAs is widespread. Volatile NNAs are not only components of MSS, SSS, and ETS, they are also present in a variety of foodstuffs and beverages. Sen et al. (15A52) noted: Nitrosopyrrolidine , which is a potent liver carcinogen [in laboratory animals], has been shown to be formed during the [a]
frying of bacon, and to be present in sausage, corned beef, luncheon meat, fried pig liver, cooked and uncooked cod fish and finned herring. [a]As noted previously, NPYR is a tobacco smoke component.
The magnitude of the occurrence of NDMA in beer was studied by Spiegelhalder (15A54) in a survey of many German beers: 70% of the sample showed NDMA at a mean
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 690
11/13/08 7:14:50 PM
691
N-Nitrosamines
concentration of 2.7 ppb with a maximum of 68 ppb. Barley malt was considered the NNA source. In 1988, Maga (2438) reviewed some forty publications on NNAs in common foodstuffs, beverages, and spices. The generation of NNAs by the reaction of ingested nitrates with body chemical components was discussed in a survey by the Office of Technology Assessment (15A38): Nitrate and nitrate salts naturally occur in vegetable, fish and meats, are in food for their preservative properties and are present in pesticide and drug residues in food. They react with other chemicals in the body to produce NNAs and N-nitrosamides.
In their 1990 list of forty-three “tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke,” a list cited frequently in reports issued by various governmental agencies (EPA, USPHS), Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) included five volatile NNAs (NDMA, NDEA, NEMA, NPYR, and NMOR), one nonvolatile NNA (NDELA), and three TSNAs (NNN, NNK, and NAB). Repeatedly since the mid-1980s, Hoffmann and his colleagues have published detailed reviews on NNAs, particularly TSNAs, their levels in tobacco, MSS, SSS, and ETS, and their supposed involvement in cancer induction in tobacco users plus many reports on other aspects of NNAs [Hecht et al. (15A18), Hoffmann et al. (1688, 1698, 1731, 1745, 1746, 1750, 1770–1772, 1774–1776), Hecht and Hoffmann (1571, 1571a, 15A19, 15A20), Hoffmann and Hecht (1725, 1727), Brunnemann et al. (459, 477), Brunnemann and Hoffmann (483, 484, 486, 487), Djordjevic et al. (977, 1013, 1015–1017), Andersen et al. (76), Rivenson et al. (3182), Prokopczyk et al. (2994, 2997)]. In addition to the studies by Hoffmann et al., a great number of conference presentations and journal publications on NNAs, particularly TSNAs, have been provided by other investigators. A representative sample includes the contributions by Brown et al. (437), Bush et al. (557), d’Andres et al. (895), de Roton et al. (951), Katsuya et al. (2050–2052), Moldoveanu et al. (2599), Nestor et al. (2700), Peele et al. (2917), Risner et al. (3176a), Risner and Wendelboe (3177), Tricker (3953), and Tricker et al. (3944–3948). Finally, with regard to NNAs it should be noted that CSCs from tobaccos grown under high-nitrate fertilization regimes produce fewer tumor-bearing animals than do the CSCs from tobaccos grown under low-nitrate fertilization regimes even though high-nitrate tobaccos usually show higher levels of both volatile NNAs and TSNAs and their smokes contain higher levels of these compounds than do low-nitrate tobaccos. The responses observed in mutagenicity testing (Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium) are the opposite of those observed in mouse skin-painting studies. Nitrate addition, use of high-nitrate tobacco, and/or use of tobacco stems, which are generally much higher in nitrate than laminae, result in reduced levels of MSS total particulate matter (and “tar”) and in mainstream CSCs with reduced levels of phenols and PAHs, including B[a]P, plus increased levels of NNAs [Wynder and Hoffmann (4312, 4317), Hoffmann and Wynder
(1797, 1798, 1801, 1802), Rathkamp and Hoffmann (3081, 3082), Hoffmann et al. (1783), Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480), Adams et al. (28)].
XV.A Volatile N-Nitrosamines The volatile NNAs in tobacco smoke, usually reported as tobacco smoke components that contribute to the health problems related to smoking, particularly the cigarette smokerespiratory tract cancer problem, are the first seven listed in Table XV-2. Table XV-3 summarizes much of the early research on the volatile N-nitrosamines. Almost a decade after the proposal by Boyland et al. (422, 423, 15A00) that the TSNAs NNN and NAB might be present in tobacco and tobacco smoke, NNN was identified in cigarette MSS by Klus and Kuhn (2136). This and subsequent identification of other TSNAs in tobacco and smoke resulted in a gradual decrease in the research effort on volatile NNAs and a significant increase in the research effort on TSNAs.
XV.B Nonvolatile N-Nitrosamines As noted in Table XV-1, N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) and N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) are classified as nonvolatile NNAs in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In bioassays in laboratory animals, N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) is the only tobacco/ tobacco smoke NNA to give negative responses. The one considered the more controversial of the two is NDELA. Prior to its identification in tobacco in 1977 and smoke in 1981, its biological properties in laboratory animals and other test systems had been studied for over a decade. Druckrey et al. (1058) reported that NDELA was an hepatic carcinogen in rats. In its review of biological data generated in NNA studies, the IARC (1866) reported that this compound induced tracheal carcinomas in the hamster. Lijinsky et al. (15A35) reported that NDELA induced carcinoma of the liver and kidney in rats. McMahon et al. (2521) reported that NDELA was mutagenic when tested in modifications of the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium. In 1977, Schmeltz et al. (3480) isolated NDELA from tobacco and identified it. In 1981, Brunnemann and Hoffmann (479) reported that cigarettes fabricated from tobaccos treated with the diethanolamine salt of maleic hydrazide delivered 10 to 40 ng/cigarette of NDELA in the MSS. These two studies were conducted when it was permissible to treat tobacco with the diethanolamine salt of maleic hydrazide, a sucker growth inhibitor. Previously reported findings on the tumorigenicity in laboratory animals of NDELA and its level in cigarette MSS eventually led to the banning by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1147) of the use on tobacco of maleic hydrazide-diethanolamine salt in the United States and acceptance of the maleic hydrazide-potassium salt as replacement for the maleic hydrazide-diethanolamine salt. In his response to the Environmental Protection Agency’s draft document (1148) on ETS, Rodgman (3255) criticized the inclusion by EPA of NDELA as a tumorigenic agent
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 691
11/13/08 7:14:51 PM
692
78836_C015.indd 692
Table XV-2 Summary of Lists of Tumorigenic N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Mainstream Smoke Delivery/Cigarette Reported by 1986 Hoffmann & Wynder (1808)
1990, 1993 Hoffmann & Hecht (1727), Hoffmann et al. (1773)
N-Nitrosamine
IARC (1870)
N-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitrosoethylmethylamine N-Nitrosodiethylamine N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine N-Nitrosopyrrolidine N-Nitrosopiperidine N-Nitrosodiethanolamine b N-Nitrososarcosine N’-Nitrosonornicotine 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone N’-Nitrosoanabasine N’-Nitrosoanatabine N-Nitrosomorpholine
1-200 ng 0.1-10 ng ND-10 nga ND-1 ng ND-3 ng 2-42 ng ND-9 ng ND-90 ng NL c 0.13-2.5 µg 0.08-0.77 µg
1-180 ng 1-40 ng 0.1-28 ng NL NL 2-110 ng ND-9 ng ND-40 ng NL 0.12-3.7 µgd 0.12-0.95 µg
ND-200 ng ND-3.7 µg NL
40-400 ng NL NL
OSHA (2825)
1997 Hoffmann & Hoffmann (1740)
1998 Hoffmann & Hoffmann (1741)
2001 Hoffmann & Hoffmann (1743)
2001 Hoffmann et al. (1744)
2001 Fowles & Bates (1217)
0.1-180 ng 3-13 ng ND-25 ng NL NL 1.5-110 ng NL ND-36 ng NL 0.12-3.7 µg 0.08-0.77 µg
10-40 ng NL ND-25 ng P, NYL P, NYL 6-30 ng P, NYL e 20-70 ng NL 0.2-3.0 µg 0.1-1.0 µg
0.1-180 ng 3-13 ng ND-2.8 ng NL NL 3-60 ng NL ND-68 ng ND 0.12-3.7 µg 0.08-0.77 µg
2-180 ng 3-13 ng ND-2.8 ng ND-1.0 ng ND-30 ng 3-110 ng ND-9 ng ND-68 ng ND 120-3.7 µg 0.08-0.77 µg
2-180 ng 3-13 ng ND-2.8 ng ND-1.0 ng ND-30 ng 3-110 ng ND-9 ng ND-68 ng NL 0.12-3.7 µg 0.08-0.77 µg
2-1000 ng 3-13 ng ND-2.8 ng ND-1.0 ng ND-30 ng 3-110 ng ND-9 ng ND-68 ng NL 0.12-3.7 µg 0.08-0.77 µg
24.4 ng 6.0 ng 8.3 n NL 12 ng 113 ng NL 30 ng NL 1.90 µg 300 µg
0.14-4.6 µg NL ND in MSS
NL NL NL
0.14-4.6 µg NL ND in MSS
ND-150 ng NL ND in MSS
NL NL NL
NL NL NL
19 ng 72.2 µg NYL
ND = not detected. A component listed in bold is no longer relevant (3300) c NL = not listed as a tumorigenic or carcinogenic component of cigarette MSS. d A range listed in bold type contains a numerical error and/or a unit error (ng vs. µg). e P = present; NYL = no yield level listed for cigarette MSS. a
b
11/13/08 7:14:52 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
1994
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1986
693
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-3 A Brief Chronology of the Research on Volatile N-Nitrosamines From 1937 to 1990 Year
Investigation
1937 1954 1956
Freund (15A13) reported the acute toxicity of NDMA in humans accidentally exposed to the reagent. Barnes and Magee (192) reported the hepatotoxicity of N-nitrosodialkylamines in several laboratory animal species. Magee and Barnes (2441a) reported that almost all rats fed a diet containing 50 ppm of NDMA developed malignant liver tumors within less than a year. Zak et al. (15A59) reported that feeding and daily oral dosing of rats with NDMA resulted in induction of lung tumors which adenomas, not the lung tumor type - squamous cell carcinoma - reported in various epidemiological studies to be associated with cigarette smoking. Rodgman (15A49) proposed that NNAs were likely cigarette MSS components. Tindall (15A55)] patented the preparation of NNAs from methyl nitrite and secondary amines.
1960
1960 1960
R1
R1 N-H + CH3-ONO
R2
N-NO + CH3OH R2
The demonstration of the presence of methyl nitrite in tobacco smoke [Laurene (2293), Philippe and Hackney (2841), Laurene et al. (2310)] led to the suggestion by Rodgman (15A49) that this was their mode of formation in tobacco smoke. This mechanism of formation of volatile NNAs was also proposed by Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 437 in (4332)]: An opportunity for the formation of nitrosamines is the interaction of methyl nitrite and secondary amines. It could be demonstrated in these laboratories, that at least in the presence of water, methyl nitrite and diethylamine form DENA. This proposal was subsequently negated when Vilcins and Lephardt (4058) demonstrated that methyl nitrite does not exist in the smoke within the cigarette or in the smoke at the instant it issues from the mouth-end of the cigarette but begins to form artifactually immediately after the smoke exits the mouth-end of the cigarette. As the level of the methyl nitrite in the aging smoke increases, its methanol level decreases. This artifactual formation of methyl nitrite was recognized by Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480): Being aware of the artifactual formation of nitrogen dioxide and methyl nitrite by aging of smoke we prefer to report nitrogen oxides in cigarette smoke as NO [nitric oxide]. 1961
Druckrey et al. (1059) reported the results of their study on the formation, chemical structure, and tumorigenicity of NNAs. This publication did not deal with the possible presence in tobacco smoke of the NNAs but their findings probably led to the1962 publication by Druckrey and Preussmann (1057). 1962 Druckrey and Preussmann (1057) theorized that the conditions in a burning cigarette were appropriate for the generation of NNAs, i.e., present in the reaction mixture were secondary amines, water, and nitrogen oxides. 1962 Data reported by Dontenwill and Mohr (15A09) indicated that NDEA had an organ-specific effect in the tracheobronchial tree of hamsters. 1962 Pasternak (15A40) and Rapoport (15A45) reported the mutagenicity of NNAs in pre-Ames (Salmonella typhimurium) test systems. Numerous reports describing the mutagenicity of NNAs were issued over the next few years. The test systems used included Drosophila melanogaster, Escherichia coli, Neurospora crassa, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, among others [see review by Magee and Barnes (2442)]. 1963- Herrold (15A24) studied the tumorigenicity of NDEA. Herrold and Dunham (15A25) studied the tumorigenicity of 1964 subcutaneously injected NDMA and reported that intratracheal or intragastric administration of NDEA to laboratory animals resulted in a large number of respiratory tract tumors. 1963 Boyland et al. (15A01) discussed the possibility of the presence of NNAs in tobacco smoke, particularly “in the acidic environment of the cigarette smoke” (pH ≤ 6.7) as opposed to the alkaline environment (pH ≥ 7.0) of cigar and pipe smoke. 1964 Boyland et al. (422, 423) suggested that it was possible, because of the formation of NNAs by the reaction of NOx with secondary amines, that cigarette MSS could contain NAB and NNN because of the presence in tobacco MSS of nornicotine and anabasine. They reported that NAB, when administered orally to rats, produced numerous esophageal tumors in the treated animals. 1964 Neurath et al. (2751) reported the isolation and identification of N-nitroso-n-butylmethylamine and the isolation of two unidentified NNAs in cigarette MSS. 1964
Boyland et al. (422, 423) suggested that it was possible, because of the formation of NNAs by the reaction of NOx with secondary amines, that cigarette MSS could contain NAB and NNN because of the presence in tobacco MSS of nornicotine and anabasine. They reported that NAB, when administered orally to rats, produced numerous esophageal tumors in the treated animals. (Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 693
11/13/08 7:14:53 PM
694
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-3 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Volatile N-Nitrosamines From 1937 to 1990 Year
1964
Investigation
Serfontein and Hurter (3595) reported the identification of NNAs in the MSS from South African cigarettes. Serfontein (15A53) reported the identification of N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP). Robertson (15A47), President of the National Cancer Association of South Africa, commented on Serfontein and Hurter’s report of the identification of NNAs in cigarette MSS: The significance of this discovery lies in the fact that although the nitrosamine compound is known as a carcinogen, this is the first time that it has been established beyond doubt that various nitrosamines occur in cigarette smoke.
1964- Serfontein and Hurter (3596-3598) developed a thin-layer chromatographic method for separation and analysis of extremely 1966 small amounts of NNAs and noted that “the method has been successfully applied to the analysis of nitrosamines in cigarette smoke.” In a detailed account of the identification of NNAs in CSC, they reported: In the course of initial scanning experiments, strong evidence was obtained by means of gas chromatographic analysis of the neutral fraction of cigarette smoke condensate…that various nitrosamines [N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), and N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP)] were present in cigarette smoke in measurable quantities. They estimated the level of NPIP to range from 1 to 5 μg/cig. Neurath et al. (2750) discounted their reported 1964 findings (2751) on the identification of MSS NNAs because of their artifactual formation during their collection and analytical procedure. However, with a modified analytical and collection procedure, NDMA (4 ng/cig) and (NPYR) (4 ng/cig) were identified in MSS. The previously reported N-nitroso-n-butylmethylamine (NBMA) was found in the part of the collection system where artifactual formation was possible. Artifactual formation of NNAs during smoke generation, separation, and analysis was a recognized problem since the first NNA identification in MSS (573, 2750, 2751, 15A10, 15A33) and resulted in much debate. Krull et al. (15A33) discussed the artifactual generation of NNAs during their determination. Subsequent research eventually resolved the question concerning the presence or absence of NNAs in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. However, some artifactual formation did occur, resulting in inflated values for NNAs in MSS and SSS [Caldwell and Conner (572-574)]. 1965 Eisenstark et al. (15A11), nearly a decade before Ames’ 1973 presentation on the use of Salmonella typhimurium to test for mutagenicity, described the high mutagenicity obtained with NNAs in tests with Salmonella typhimurium. Several potent NNAs became positive standards, e.g., N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium. 1965- Besides identifying several volatile NNAs in burley tobacco MSS with a procedure that precluded artifactual formation, 1967 Fredrickson (1236) demonstrated that MSS volatile NNA yields were significantly reduced (60-85%) by a plasticized cellulose acetate filter, a finding later confirmed (514, 1761, 2635). This reduction of volatile NNA yields by selective filtration paralleled that observed for phenols (2312, 4312). Concern over phenols and their promotion effect diminished after reports of removal of significant amounts of them from MSS by selective filtration. While concern about volatile NNAs did diminish, a new NNA concern arose: One involving TSNAs, a class of NNAs newly identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke, namely NNN and NAB. 1967 In their NNA review, Magee and Barnes (2442), cf. Barnes and Magee (192) noted: 1965
It is too early to be able to suggest with any confidence the part nitrosamines might play in the etiology of human cancer. In a whole range of experimental animals tumors can be produced in a number of different sites which bear in some cases a striking pathological resemblance to cancers seen in man. However, the species, the nature of the nitroso compound, and the dose and route by which it is administered can all play a part in determining the nature of the malignant lesion produced. 1967 1967
Brune and Henning (15A02) reported the induction of eyelid carcinoma in mice treated with methylbutyl-N-nitrosamine Wynder and Hoffmann noted [see p. 436 and p. 628 in (4332)]: To date, we lack a method of quantitative determination of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke although a few good quantitative techniques have emerged. Since the presence of nitrosamines in cigarette smoke bears considerable implications in tobacco carcinogenesis, it is hoped that further and more detailed studies will also be initiated by other groups to clarify fully this important factor… A most important question, however, is whether nitrosamines are indeed formed during smoking of tobacco and whether the induction of papillary tumors in the respiratory tree of hamsters bears any relation to the induction of human bronchiogenic cancer. They concluded [p. 639 in (4332)]:
1967
At this time one cannot deny the potential of tobacco smoke to form nitrosamines; however, we are not convinced that these agents actually exist in the cigarette smoke inhaled by man. Hoffmann and Wynder (1797) and Rathkamp and Hoffmann (3081, 3082) demonstrated that addition of nitrates to tobacco decreased the per cigarette yields of TPM, promoting/cocarcinogenic phenols, and tumorigenic PAHs (including B[a]P) in MSS and the tumorigenicity of the mainstream CSC to mouse skin. Later, Brunnemann et al. (471, 499) reported that increased levels of tobacco nitrate increased MSS yields of both volatile NNAs and TSNAs, resulting in recommendations to reduce the nitrate levels in tobacco stems and ribs.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 694
11/13/08 7:14:53 PM
695
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-3 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Volatile N-Nitrosamines From 1937 to 1990 Year
Investigation
1968
Montesano and Saffiotti (15A37) studied the carcinogenic response of the respiratory tract of Syrian golden hamsters to different doses of NDEA. They also summarized over two dozen previous studies with NDEA. In their review of the identification and quantitation of NNAs in MSS, Johnson et al. (1952) wrote:
1968
It is possible…that little or no nitrosamines are present in cigarette smoke under normal conditions of smoking. Because of the importance of these compounds and the known high incidence of lung cancer, the establishment of their presence in smoke is of importance in the health of man… Even if the nitrosamines are identified and unequivocally established as being present in cigarette smoke at a certain level then it must be investigated whether they contribute to the total toxic activity of tobacco smoke. 1970
Volatile NNA tumorigenicity in laboratory animals was repeatedly cited with the implication that this property was extrapolable to man because of cigarette smoke NNAs. In laboratory animals, NNAs are organ-specific tumorigens and seldom have been shown to induce carcinoma at the painting site in mouse skin-painting experiments. Hoffmann and Wynder (15A29) noted: We…need to consider that nitrosamines have so far not been reported to be carcinogenic to man.
1971
1974
Hoffmann and Vais (1784) reported NDMA and NEMA in unaged MSS from an 85-mm nonfiltered U.S. blend cigarette: NDMA and NEMA yields were 80 and 30 ng/cig, respectively. NDEA and NDBA were not detected. The properties of an NNA thought to be NPIP did not match those of an authentic sample. The chapter in the 1972 Surgeon General’s report (4003) dealing with the harmful components of tobacco smoke noted that the reports describing the presence of various NNAs in cigarette smoke were published after the June 1970 conference on which the chapter was based. Morie and Sloan (2636) reported the substantial reduction of the volatile NNA N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) by plasticized cellulose acetate filters vs. the negligible reduction obtained with paper filters. Substantial selective filtration of NDMA was demonstrated by the 85% reduction in its delivery vs. the 36% reduction observed in the delivery of total particulate matter with the plasticized cellulose acetate filter. Minimal selective filtration was obtained with the paper filter: 66% reduction in NDMA vs. 55% reduction in total particulate matter, cf. Fredrickson (1236). Hoffmann et al. (1761) confirmed the findings of Hoffmann and Vais (1784) on NNAs in cigarette MSS. They reported 84 ng/cig of NDMA, 30 ng/cig of NEMA, and less than 5 ng/cig of NDEA in the MSS of a nonfiltered U.S. blend cigarette. They also reported that selective filtration produced a 60 to 85% reduction of volatile NNAs by use of a plasticized cellulose acetate filter, cf. Fredrickson (1236), Morie and Sloan (2636). Barnes (191) [the co-discoverer with Magee of the tumorigenicity of NNAs (Magee and Barnes (2441a)] stated:
1976
Preoccupation with the occurrence and behavior of minute amounts of nitrosamines in the human environment will probably divert skills from more profitable studies of the behavior of nitrosamines in experimental systems… If [this essay] leaves the reader with the impression that nitrosamines have a much greater potential as research tools than they have as health hazards, it will have served its purpose. Magee et al. (2443) wrote:
1972
1973
1974
1977
That a wide range of species is susceptible to the carcinogenic action of nitrosamines suggests that man is probably not resistant…Many N-nitroso compounds are powerfully carcinogenic in experimental animals, and, although there is no proof, it is highly probable that they are also carcinogenic in man. Brunnemann et al. (514) reported that the volatile NNA levels in MSS and SSS were lower than previously reported, attributing the lower levels to the avoidance of artifactual formation of NNAs during smoke collection and analysis. They wrote: In fact, several of the cigarettes which were machine smoked earlier and analyzed without precautions, when smoked by us under the same conditions but with precautions, yielded 25 to 100% lower values for DMN [N-nitrosodimethylamine] and NPY [N-nitrosopyrrolidine] for the mainstream smoke…The nitrate content of the tobacco appears to be a determining factor for the concentration of volatile nitrosamines in the smoke. Selective removal of these nitrosamines does occur with cellulose acetate filter tips but not with charcoal filter tips. They determined the levels of volatile NNA for unaged MSS and SSS from 17 commercial and experimental cigarettes (Table XV-3). Level Found, ng/cig Volatile NNA NDMA NEMA NDEA NPYR
MSS 1.7 - 97 0.1 - 9.1 0 - 4.8 0 - 4.8
SSS 680 - 1770 9 - 75 8 - 73 8 - 73 (Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 695
11/13/08 7:14:54 PM
696
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-3 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Volatile N-Nitrosamines From 1937 to 1990 Year
1977
Investigation
The Royal College of Physicians (3364) reported that N-nitroso compounds were, along with the PAHs, the chief initiators of cancer in tobacco smoke. The College noted: The NNAs in food and drink are regarded as a potential health hazards at concentrations as low as one part per billion. N’-Nitrosonornicotine has been identified in both tobacco smoke and unburnt tobacco, the concentration in the latter being 2,000 to 9,000 parts per billion…concentrations much higher than those of other nitroso compounds found in meat, fish, or beverages. Its presence may be of great biological importance and could explain the correlation between tobacco chewing and the development of cancer of the mouth.
1978
1978 1979
The problem of the artifactual formation of volatile NNAs during smoke collection and analysis was discussed previously by Neurath (2750, 2751) and by Fredrickson (1236). It was once again revisited. Krull et al. (15A33) described the problem of artifactual formation of NNAs during the collection, fractionation, and analysis of cigarette smoke and proposed methodology to reduce the problem. This problem resurfaced several times in the next decade in the determination of both volatile NNAs [Eisenbrand et al. (15A10); Caldwell and Conner ( 572, 573)] and TSNAs in tobacco smoke (572, 573); preventative measures were described. Brunnemann and Hoffmann (477) described the results of their measurements of volatile NNAs in indoor air containing ETS. In the 1979 U.S. Surgeon General report [see p. 107 in (4005)], it was noted: The N-nitrosamine formation in tobacco smoke is determined by the nitrate content of the tobacco… More importantly… selective removal (70 to 80 percent) of volatile nitrosamines from the smoke can be achieved by cellulose filters [sic]a… At present, it has not been demonstrated that a significant reduction of volatile N-nitrosamines will lead to a significant reduction of the tumorigenic potential of cigarette smoke.
a
This should read “cellulose acetate.”
It was also stated that NNAs are animal carcinogens with the ability to induce pulmonary tumors (adenomas). 1979
1980
1980
Rinkus and Legator (3157) listed numerous tobacco and cigarette smoke components as mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium system. Among these were the following volatile NNAs [excluding (NMOR)] known to occur in tobacco smoke: NDMA, NDEA, NPYR, NDBA, NDPA, NMOR, NPIP. In discussing “The Less Harmful Cigarette,” Hoffmann et al. (1783) included a table which showed that nitrate fertilization of tobacco [which leads to increased NNAs formation] has led to significant reductions in MSS levels of “tar”, nicotine, and B[a]P as well as in the specific tumorigenicity of the “tar” administered via skin painting to laboratory animals. They wrote that “the reduction of the tar content of cigarettes [sic] was an important step in reducing the hazards of cigarette smoking.” Hoffmann et al. (1711) noted: In the mainstream smoke of a cigarette, these carcinogens [the volatile N-nitrosamines] can be reduced significantly by utilization of tobacco low in nitrate content and acetate filter tips that selectively retain volatile N-nitrosamines.
1980 1980
1980 1981
1982
1982
1982
They also stated that “most present-day commercial filter cigarettes are effectively reducing volatile NNAs.” This effective reduction in volatile NNAs in cigarette MSS has not lessened during the intervening years from 1980 to date! Brunnemann et al. (467) presented additional data on the levels of NNAs in MSS and SSS, cf. Brunnemann et al., (457). The SSS levels exceeded those in the MSS. Much of the MSS and sidestream data for NNAs were summarized by Hoffmann et al. (1685). Bartsch et al. (203) listed numerous NNAs as mutagenic in the Ames Salmonella typhimurium test system. The following volatile NNAs reported as tobacco and/or smoke components were included: NDMA, NDEA, NMPA, NDPA, NDBA, NPYR, NMOR, and NPIP. NNN was also tested. Rühl et al. (3366) reported the levels of volatile NNAs and TSNAs in the MSSs and SSSs from American, German, and French cigarettes. In the 1981 Surgeon General’s report (4009) on smoking vs. health, volatile NNAs were discussed as “organ-specific carcinogens.” The Surgeon General, citing Brunnemann et al. (514), noted: “The volatile nitrosamines…can be selectively reduced by filtration…” [cf. Fredrickson (1236), Morie and Sloan (2636)]. In the 3rd Annual Report on Carcinogens by the National Technical Information Service (2686), it was noted: “there is sufficient evidence for the carcinogenicity of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in experimental animals.” Similar comments were made about NPYR (MSS yield estimated as being as much as 113 ng/cig) and NDEA (MSS, 8 ng/cig; SSS yield, about ten times that in MSS). Hoffmann and Wynder (1807a) included a table which indicated that nitrate fertilization (known to increase the levels of NNAs in the tobacco and the smoke from it) significantly reduced the biologically activity (carcinogenicity) of CSC to mouse skin. The PAH levels in the CSC were also reported to be reduced. In contrast to suggestions made in the late 1950s/early 1960s to control the pyrogenesis of PAHs by reduction of the tobacco wax components, e.g., long-chained saturated hydrocarbons such as n-hentriacontane, and/or the use of high-nitrate tobacco, Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480) recommended the following approaches - the direct opposite of the earlier suggestions from the Wynder and Hoffmann laboratory - to control both the PAHs and the NNAs in tobacco smoke:
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 696
11/13/08 7:14:55 PM
697
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-3 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Volatile N-Nitrosamines From 1937 to 1990 Year
Investigation
Selective filtration is highly effective in removing volatile N-nitrosamines from the smoke stream, but is ineffective for the selective reduction of tobacco-specific nitrosamines. Selective reduction of nitrate in tobacco stems offers one possible approach, but additional means of reducing nitrogen oxides and N-nitrosamines without diminishing PAH reduction need to be found. Selection of tobacco with high levels of long chain hydrocarbons (e.g. hentriacontane C31H64) may be helpful.
1982
These 1982 suggestions for the design of a “less hazardous” cigarette were in direct contradiction to those offered two decades previously when the main emphasis was not on NNAs (their presence in tobacco smoke was, at best, theoretical in the early 1960s) but on the tetracyclic and higher PAHs, particularly B[a]P, because of the known effect of it and other PAHs on the skin of laboratory animals. The 1982 report of the Surgeon General (4010), citing the studies of Magee et al. (2443) and the IARC (1866), concluded: More than 50 of the approximately 100 NNAs which have been tested have various degrees of carcinogenic potency in laboratory animals… There is a lack of direct evidence that these compounds are also human carcinogens. Nonetheless, many scientists concur with the [IARC] that, for practical purposes, these nitrosamines should be regarded as carcinogenic in humans.
1982 1983
It was noted that NDMA and NPYR were the most plentiful NNAs in cigarette smoke. NDMA is listed in this report as a “toxic and tumorigenic agent” in the vapor phase of cigarette smoke. Both NEMA (MSS delivery, 1 to 40 ng/cig) and NDEA (MSS delivery, 0.1 to 28 ng/cig) were reported as “among the most potent environmental carcinogens” of the NNAs. Stehlik et al. (3812) determined the levels of NDMA in the air of cigarette smoke-filled rooms. In his concluding remarks at the 1983 NNA conference (published in 1984), Magee (2441) stated: A major component of this evidence [that N-nitroso compounds probably can cause human cancer] is the large number of species known to be susceptible to cancer induction by nitrosamines… The question of whether any human cancer has been caused by nitrosamines remains open, but several relevant and interesting presentations were given during the meeting… Following up the well-established relationship between cigarette smoking and the incidence of human lung cancer, these workers [Hoffmann, Hecht, Castonguay, and their colleagues] presented persuasive evidence for a relationship between the use of chewing tobacco and snuff and human cancer…A role for nitrosamines in the causation of human cancer has not been established, but it should not be excluded and merits further study.
1984
Although their data showed that an increase in the nitrate content of cigarette tobacco reduced the levels of FTC “tar”, nicotine, carbon monoxide, catechol, and B[a]P, Adams et al. (28) emphasized that significantly higher yields of volatile NNAs and TSNAs were found in the MSS of an 85-mm nonfiltered cigarette. They concluded: The findings of this study support the recommendation that the nitrate content of tobacco products should be reduced.
1984
1984
[Cf. 1967/1970 studies and comments by Hoffmann and Wynder (1797, 1798) and Rathkamp and Hoffmann (3081, 3082) that use of high-nitrate tobacco was beneficial in that it reduced the levels of CSC PAHs and CSC tumorigenicity to mouse skin. Also, the findings of Brunnemann et al. (481, 482) that addition of stems, high in nitrate, did not reduce “tar”, nicotine, or carbon monoxide yields.] Despite three decades of a variety of claims against the PAHs and their role in carcinoma induction in laboratory animals skin-painted with CSC and their alleged role in carcinoma induction in cigarette smokers, it is interesting to note that in the American Chemical Society monograph (2nd edition) edited by Searle (3568), the only class of compounds in tobacco or cigarette smoke discussed with regard to their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals was the NNAs. Even though several chapters were written by experts in the fields of PAH, their nitrogen analogs, and aromatic amines, no mention was made throughout this two-volume 1400-page monograph of the numerous PAHs in tobacco or cigarette smoke, their levels, or their role in respiratory tract cancer attributed by some to the PAHs in cigarette smoke. The only class of tumorigens discussed was the NNAs and TSNAs. Most of the data cited were those of Hoffmann and his colleagues. The Preussmann and Eisenbrand summary (2990) of research on NNAs in tobacco and tobacco smoke was, according to their article, taken largely from a 1982 review by Hoffmann et al. Preussmann and Eisenbrand commented: Although Hoffmann et al. have clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of cellulose acetate filters in model experiments, the values for U.S. commercial cigarettes are about the same for filter as for nonfilter cigarettes; the reductive effect of filters in practice may be counteracted by variations in tobacco composition between the two types of cigarettes… In conclusion, tobacco and tobacco smoke represent the largest nonocccupational source of exposure for preformed nitrosamines.
1984 1984 1986 1987
Matsushita and Mori (2495) determined the levels of nitrogen dioxide and volatile NNAs in indoor air and cigarette SSS. Preussmann (15A43) tabulated the ranges of the reported levels of a variety of NNAs in tobacco and in cigarette MSS and SSS. The IARC (170) concluded that NDMA, NDEA, NPYR, and NEMA were tumorigenic to laboratory animals and that NDMA was one of the two most abundant volatile NNAs in cigarette MSS. Klus et al. (15A32) reported the levels of several volatile NNAs in ETS in several real life situations. (Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 697
11/13/08 7:14:55 PM
698
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-3 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Volatile N-Nitrosamines From 1937 to 1990 Year
Investigation
1987
The RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances) (3095) reviewed the studies in which lung tumors were observed in laboratory animals treated with an NNA by a variety of administration routes. The RTECS categorized the positive inhalation findings involving NNAs as “equivocal.” E.g., the dose level used (200000 ng/m3) for NDMA in the inhalation experiments was significantly greater than the NDMA level observed (10 to 240 ng/m3) in ETS exposure.
1989- Caldwell and Conner (573) reported: 1990 The methodology previously reported [by others] leads to significant overestimation of N-nitrosamine concentrations in cigarette smoke. The overestimations were true for both volatile and tobacco-specific NNAs in MSS and SSS for the Kentucky Reference Cigarette 1R4F: MSS data indicated that the levels were 380% high for NPYR and 83%, 38%, 27%, and 19% for NAB, NAT, NNK, and NNN, respectively. Thus, it is probable that many of the previously reported levels of NNAs in MSS and SSS, tabulated in various articles [cf. Adams et al. (31), Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)] and cited by EPA (1148) and the U.S. Surgeon General (4005, 4009, 4010, 15A57) are incorrect. Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) did not acknowledge that the MSS levels listed for volatile NNAs and the TSNAs were likely to be incorrect (and high) because of the artifactual formation of both types during MSS (and SSS) collection for analysis as reported by Caldwell and Conner (572-574). EPA (1148) accepted without question the MSS volatile NNA and TSNA yields listed by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) whose data were cited by the U.S. Surgeon General (4012). The levels of various NNAs reported in foodstuffs and beverages are also possibly in error because of artifactual formation of NNAs during the isolation procedure and subsequent quantitation. 1990
In their list of 43 “tumorigenic agents” in tobacco and/or smoke, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) included the following volatile NNAs: NDMA, NDEA, NEMA, and NPYR. Little comment was made about these four volatile NNAs and their supposed tumorigenicity to smokers. However, they did note that IARC (1870) had evaluated the bioassay data from laboratory animals exposed to these NNAs and considered the data sufficient to classify all four as tumorigenic to animals. IARC did not express an opinion as to whether these four were tumorigenic to humans. Brunnemann et al. (1459, 460, 462) summarized data from several publications on the levels of various volatile NNAs (NDMA and NPYR) in indoor air at various sites (trains, offices, coffee shops, dance halls).
in tobacco and/or smoke. EPA had based its assessment of this compound on the Hoffmann-Hecht list of forty-three “tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke” (1727). Rodgman’s reasoning was as follows: Since the diethanolamine salt had not been used in the United States for nearly a decade, the level of this nitrosamine should now be substantially reduced in tobacco as well as in MSS and SSS from cigarettes containing such tobacco. The chronological pattern of decrease in levels of NDELA might parallel those reported for the decrease in levels of arsenic and DDT in tobacco (and its smoke) when arsenicals and DDT were no longer used on tobacco in the United States. For example, in 1952, arsenicals were removed from the list of recommended and permissible insecticides for tobacco. By 1968, the arsenic content of U.S.-grown tobacco had decreased to 0.5–1.0 μg/g from the 1951 level of about 50 μg/g of tobacco (1870, 4005); arsenic levels reported in 1975 by Griffin et al. (1391) were 0.5 to 0.9 μg/g of tobacco. Similarly, discontinuance of the use of chlorinated insecticides such as DDT in U.S. tobacco culture in the late 1960s resulted in a gradual and substantial reduction of DDT residues in leaf tobacco. Between 1968 and 1974, the residual DDT level in American flue-cured tobacco decreased rapidly and substantially (1870, 4005) from 52 μg/g in 1968 to 6 μg/g in 1970, and to 0.23 μg/g in 1974.
Hoffmann et al. (1696) had predicted that the NDELA level in tobacco would decrease: At present, NDELA [N-nitrosodiethanolamine] levels are relatively high in U.S. brands (290–300 mg/kg) but they are expected to decrease, since the herbicide was banned from use on tobacco as of October 1981 (1147).
In 1982, the U.S. Surgeon General concluded (4010) that NDELA was a carcinogen, noting not only did NDELA induce carcinomas in treated laboratory animals (carcinoma of the liver and kidneys in rats, carcinoma of the trachea in hamsters) but also it was present in tobaccos treated with the diethanolamine salt of maleic hydrazide. In the National Technical Information Service 3rd Annual Report on Carcinogens (2686), it was concluded that there was sufficient evidence to classify NDELA as a carcinogen in laboratory animals. In its review of tumorigenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, the IARC (1870) noted for NDELA: Its presence in tobacco products has been related to the use of the sucker growth inhibitor, maleic hydrazide when formulated with the diethanolamine salt (“MH-30” or “MH-40”) …; in the USA, that formulation has been replaced by the potassium salt … Tobaccos grown in a pesticide-free
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 698
11/13/08 7:14:56 PM
699
N-Nitrosamines
NO N HO
H N
H N
II
OH HO
I
OH
O
III
NO N O IV
Figure XV-1 N-Nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) and N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR). environment and smoke generated from such tobaccos are devoid of N-nitroso-diethanolamine [NDELA].
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) included five volatile NNAs [NDMA, NDEA, NEMA, NPYR, NMOR] and the nonvolatile NDELA in their list of forty-three “tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke.” They noted that NMOR had not been reported as a tobacco smoke component. Possible relationships between diethanolamine {I}, NDELA {II}, morpholine {III}, and NMOR {IV} are illustrated in Figure XV-1. It is possible that as the NDELA level in tobacco has declined, the levels of morpholine and NMOR also have declined. More recent major efforts in the NNA-tobacco area have been devoted to the study of TSNAs and N-nitrosamino acids rather than to the NDELA/NMOR question. Tobacco products and smoke, however, are not the only source of exposure to NDELA. As noted previously, it is highly likely that the current levels of NDELA in tobacco products is approaching zero because of the discontinued use of the diethanolamine salt of maleic hydrazide in U.S. tobacco agronomy. However, consumer exposure to NDELA from nontobacco sources is possible. Studies of NDELAcontaminated cosmetics indicated substantial levels of NDELA have been identified in cosmetics, for example, Fan et al. (15A12) detected NDELA in twenty-seven of twentynine products tested at levels ranging from 1 to 48,000 ppb; Klein et al. (15A31) detected it in five of ten cosmetic products (range = 20 to 4113 ppb). Hecht (15A15) found no NDELA in the products but did find N-nitrosomethyldodecylamine in six of seven cosmetics containing laurylamine (dodecylamine). NDELA is readily absorbed through the skin after application of NDELA-contaminated cosmetics and is detected in cosmetic users’ urine, [see Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990)]. The other nonvolatile NNA is NPRO (see Table XV-1). It was not included by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) in their list of forty-three “tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke” or any of the subsequent lists tabulated in Table XV-2. Scott et al. (3566) and Brunnemann et al. (511) reported that cigarette and chewing tobaccos differed in their NPRO levels: Cigarette tobacco contained ≈2 ppm (less than 1% of free proline was nitrosated), chewing tobacco contained about 35 ppm (up to 40% of free proline was nitrosated). They reported that the NPRO level is dependent on proline level, nitrate level, and curing method.
Brunnemann et al. (509) reported the measurement of the endogenous formation of NPRO in smokers and nonsmokers on a controlled diet, relatively low in proline and ascorbic acid. The NPRO in urine was determined in 24-h urine samples on days 3, 6, 9, and 12. Different groups in the study were administered proline and/or ascorbic acid at appropriate times during the experiment. Ascorbic acid intake reduced urinary levels of NPRO. Differences in NPRO excretion by smokers and nonsmokers on the controlled diet, ascorbic acid supplement, no proline supplement were not statistically significant. The results of numerous studies on the in vivo formation of NNAs were presented at the 1983 IARC conference [O’Neill et al. (15A39)]. Many dealt with the in vivo generation of NPRO in nitrite- and proline-treated mammalian species, including humans. Numerous investigations have been conducted on NPRO because of its presence not only in tobacco and tobacco smoke but also in a variety of consumer products (meat, bacon, ham, chicken, fish, toast, biscuits, cornflakes, beer) [Brunnemann et al. (509), Hansen et al. (15A14), Pensabene et al. (15A41), Pollock (15A42), Sen and Seaman (15A50), Sen et al. (15A51)]. In the IARC monograph (1870), it was noted that NPRO was detected in cigarette smoke at extremely low levels (<1 ng/cigarette) by Brunnemann et al. (511) despite the fact it is readily detected in tobaccos. Hoffmann et al. (1696) listed the levels of NPRO in various tobacco products (cigarette tobaccos, little cigars, cigars, chewing tobaccos, snuff). The reported values ranged from a low of 450 to a high of 22000 ng/g of tobacco (dry weight).
XV.C Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines A year after the proposal by Druckrey and Preussmann (1057) that the conditions in a smoked cigarette were appropriate for the generation of NNAs, Boyland et al. (422, 423, 15A01) speculated that it was possible, because of the formation of NNAs by the reaction of nitrogen oxides with secondary amines, that cigarette MSS could contain NNN and NAB because of the presence of the secondary amines nornicotine and anabasine in tobacco and smoke. They also reported that oral administration of NAB to rats induced esophageal tumors. After nearly a decade of investigation on the volatile NNAs in tobacco smoke, attention was turned to the higher molecular weight NNAs. Figure XV-2 shows the relationships among the nicotinerelated alkaloids — nornicotine {V}, nicotine {VI}, anatabine {VII}, anabasine{VIII} — and the NNAs {IX, XI-XVII} and cotinine {X}. Table XV-4 summarizes some of the early research on the TSNAs. Between the early 1980s and 2004, a substantial number of studies were devoted to some aspect of the TSNAs in tobacco and/or its smoke. Included were conference presentations and journal publications in which were discussed analytical technology, artifactual TSNA generation during collection and analysis, quantitation, adverse biological effects and their inhibition, and effect on various biological systems and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 699
11/13/08 7:14:57 PM
700
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
LEGEND
R
N H
R IX
R
R V
VI
R
N
N
N
NO
O XIII
N NO
R
X
R
O R
N OH R NO XIV
N H
VII
N H
R
VIII
V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII
R= N
N
XI
NO
N
R
NO
NO
XV
XIV
CH=O
CH2OH N
XII
N
R
XVI
R NO
COOH N
NO
XV XVI XVII
XVII
Nornicotine Nicotine Anatabine {1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-2,3'-bipyridine} Anabasine {3-(2-piperidinyl)pyridine} N´-Nitrosonornicotine {NNN} Cotinine N´-Nitrosoanatabine {NAT} N´-Nitrosoanabasine {NAB} 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1butanone {NNK} 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1butanol {NNAL} 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-4butanol {iso-NNAL} 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)butanal 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-4-(3pyridinyl)butanoic acid {iso-NNAC}
Figure XV-2 Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines.
Table XV-4 A Brief Chronology of the Research on Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines Year
Investigation
1964
Boyland et al. (422, 423) suggested that, because of the possibility of the formation of NNAs by the reaction of NOx with secondary amines, cigarette MSS could contain NAB and NNN generated from nornicotine and anabasine in tobacco MSS. NAB, when administered orally to rats, induced esophageal tumors in the treated animals.
1973
At the Austria Tabakwerke A.G., Klus and Kuhn (2136) detected 40 ng/cig of NNN in the MSS from cigarettes made with nornicotine-rich tobacco (1.95% nornicotine). However, they failed to detect NNN in the MSS from a blended commercial cigarette. They concluded: From the biological and toxicological points of view, the expected quantity of nornicotine nitrosamine developed from a commercial cigarette containing an average of 0.04% nornicotine is almost meaningless.
1973
Rathkamp et al. (3080) reported that MSS from an 85-mm U.S. blend nonfiltered cigarette contained NAT at less than 20 ng/cig.
1974
Hoffmann et al. (1761) confirmed the report by Klus and Kuhn (2136) of the presence of NNN in cigarette MSS. They suggested that nicotine and nornicotine were NNN precursors with nicotine actually being the more important precursor because of its preponderance in tobacco. Their results differed, however, from those of Klus and Kuhn on the level of NNN in MSS from a commercial blended cigarette; Hoffmann et al. (1761) reported that the MSS from a nonfiltered U.S. blended cigarette contained 137 ng of NNN.
1974
Hecht et al. (1576) reported the level of NNN in tobacco paralleled the nitrate level. They also suggested the TSNA levels in tobacco may be controllable by appropriate selection of the curing process. Flue-cured tobaccos usually show the lowest NNN level vs. the levels in tobaccos cured by other methods, e.g., air-curing.
1974
Hoffmann et al. (1733) reported that various types of commercial tobacco contained substantial levels of NNN at levels ranging from 2 to 90 mg/g (2 to 90 ppm). Two commercial cigarette samples showed NNN levels of 2.2 and 6.6 mg/g. They noted: This is to our knowledge the highest concentration of a positively identified NNA yet reported in an environmental source. NNAs in meat, fish, beverages, and related materials rarely exceed 0.1 ppm.
1976- Hecht et al. (1563, 1565) suggested that nicotine was the precursor of NNK and 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-11977 butanal in tobacco via opening of the pyrrolidine ring of nicotine. 1977
The Royal College of Physicians (3364) noted: N’-Nitrosonornicotine has been identified in both tobacco smoke and unburnt tobacco, the concentration in the latter being 2,000 to 9,000 parts per billion – concentrations much higher than those of other nitroso compounds found in meat, fish, or beverages. Its presence may be of great biological importance and could explain the correlation between tobacco chewing and the development of cancer of the mouth.
1979
For tobaccos, Hoffmann et al. (1679) reported levels of 0.2 to 45 ppm of NNN and 0.1 to 35 ppm of NNK. For cigarettes, they reported MSS levels of 0.2 to 3.7 μg/cig for NNN and 0.12 to 0.44 μg/cig for NNK.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 700
11/13/08 7:14:59 PM
701
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-4 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines Year
1979
1979 1980
1981 1981
1981
Investigation
After reviewing earlier data that indicated NNN was moderately carcinogenic in the Syrian golden hamster, Hoffmann et al. (15A28) concluded: Since NNN is present in ppm levels in tobacco and in microgram amounts in the smoke of a cigarette, it may contribute to the carcinogenicity of tobacco smoke. The U.S. Surgeon General (4005) reported the identification of NNN and NAT in MSS. MSS levels listed for NNN were those reported by Hoffmann et al. (1679) (0.2 to 3.7 μg/cig. No quantitative data were listed for NAT. Hecht et al. (15A18) reported high rates of benign and malignant tumors in two groups of F344 rats treated with TSNAs. One group of rats was treated with NNN; the other group was treated with NNK. For each group, the TSNA (3.4 mmol total dosage) was administered in 60 subdoses over a period of 20 weeks. Adams et al. (23) reported the results of their study on the transfer of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) from tobacco to MSS and its formation from tobacco components during the tobacco smoking process. McCoy et al. (15A36) studied the influence of ethanol in the diet on the tumorigenicity of NNN administered to Syrian golden hamsters at two dose levels. In the group of test animals whose caloric intake was equal to that of the control group, no accelerating effect of ethanol on NNN tumorigenicity was observed. Hoffmann et al. (1710) reported that, in a study involving subcutaneous injections into Syrian golden hamsters, the tumor production data indicated NNK was a more potent carcinogen than NNN. The authors stressed the importance of this finding because of the relatively high exposure (approximately 1 µg/cig for an 85-mm filtered cigarette) of smokers to NNK (see also Table 9) which they described: As a carcinogen more potent than the strongly carcinogenic N’-nitrosonornicotine… Exposure to NNK in tobacco and tobacco smoke should certainly be minimized.
1981
In the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1981 report (4009), the relative tumorigenicities of NNN, NNK, and (NAT were discussed: NNN is a moderately active carcinogen in mice, rats, and Syrian golden hamsters, whereas NNK is a strong carcinogen to the respiratory tract of all three species; NAT has so far not been bioassayed. After it was noted that conclusive epidemiologic data were not available to define the precise effect of NNN in humans, the following statement was cited from a 1978 IARC report: NNN should be regarded for practical purposes as if it were carcinogenic to humans.
1982
1982 1982
Brunnemann et al. (471) described the environmental occurrence of NNAs derived from foods and other consumer items, including tobacco products. They also discussed the possibility of the in vivo formation of NNAs in blood serum, gastric secretions, and urine. The IARC (1867) concluded that there was sufficient laboratory evidence to categorize NNN as carcinogenic in laboratory animals. In the 3rd Annual Report on Carcinogens by the National Technical Information Service (2686), the National Toxicology Program officials noted: Cigarette smokers, tobacco chewers, cancer researchers, and organic chemists are at greatest risk of exposure to N-nitrosonornicotine… Smokers and persons breathing tobacco smoke may inhale a significant amount of N-nitrosonornicotine. The amount of this substance in commercial U.S. tobacco products varies from 1.9 to 88.5 ppm; this is one of the highest values of an experimental nitroso compound reported in the literature.
1982
1982 1983
In the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1982 report (4011), it was stated: At this time, there is no experimental evidence on the formation of TSN (tobacco-specific nitrosamines) in the lung upon inhalation of tobacco smoke. However, a smoker of one or two packs of cigarettes daily retains…1 to 4 milligrams of nornicotine…thus, in vivo formation of tobacco-specific NNAs is a real possibility. The report also concluded that NNK is “…by far the most potent carcinogens of the TSNAs.” In this 1982 report, NNK was included in a list of “toxic and tumorigenic agents of cigarette smoke.” It was noted that the level of NAT in MSS of U.S. cigarettes ranged from 0.15 to 4.6 ng/cig. It was also pointed out that no carcinogenicity bioassay data were currently available for NAT in 1982. In their review on MSS and SSS composition and SSS:MSS ratios, Klus and Kuhn (2142) summarized the published data [Hoffmann et al. (1679)] on MSS and SSS yields of several tobacco-specific NNAs (NNN, NNK, NAT). Using radiolabeled compounds, Adams et al. (29) conducted a detailed study on the formation and transfer of NNK: It was reported that 6.9-11.0% of the tobacco component transferred to MSS; this amount represented 26-37% of the NNK in MSS, the remainder (63-74%) was considered to be formed from nicotine during the smoking process. However, conflicting data were later presented by Fischer et al. (1193, 1199) who reported that NNN and NNK in cigarette MSS arose only by transfer from the tobacco rod and were not formed pyrogenetically during the smoking process. (Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 701
11/13/08 7:14:59 PM
702
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-4 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines Year
Investigation
1983
Hecht et al. (15A16) reported the induction of lung tumors in Syrian golden hamsters treated with a single dose of 1 milligram of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK). Castonguay et al. (15A08) reported:
1983
As a result of tobacco smoking, NNN [N’-nitrosonornicotine] and NNK [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1butanone] are among the most ubiquitous procarcinogens detected in the human environment. In their carcinogenicity study, Castonguay et al. found that a total dose of 0.1 mmol of NNK induced 3.76 lung tumor/mouse, or a total of 86.5 lung tumors. This value was 29 times higher than that found in the similarly treated NNN group. The number of lung carcinomas in the NNK group was 41 times higher than that in the NNN group. 1983 Brunnemann et al. (499) studied the influence of stem (and their nitrate content) on the volatile and tobacco-specific NNAs in MSS and SSS. They reported that the MSS yields of “tar”, nicotine, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide were not greatly influenced by filler nitrate content. This should be contrasted with previous reports from the same laboratory – at a time when nitrate addition or high-nitrate tobacco use was touted as beneficial – on the reduction in smoke yields of “tar”, nicotine, PAHs, phenols, and carbon monoxide as a result of nitrate addition [Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), Hoffmann and Wynder (1797, 1798)]. The SSS yield of NDMA was extremely high (>1000 ng/cig). SSS yields of NDMA and NNN were dependent on filler nitrate content. 1983- Hecht et al. (15A17, 15A22) and Hecht and Lin (15A21) demonstrated the genotoxicity (Ames test with Salmonella 1984 typhimurium) of NNK and NNN [Hecht et al. (15A17)]. 1984 As noted previously, since the early 1980s, Hoffmann and his colleagues at the American Health Foundation have presented or published numerous reviews, many repetitious in content, of their views on NNAs. In particular, they have emphasized the TSNAs, their levels in tobacco, in MSS and SSSs, and in ETS, their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals, and their supposed involvement in tumor induction in tobacco users, e.g., Hecht et al. (15A17), Hoffmann et al. (1688, 1730, 1731, 1746, 1770, 1772, 15A26, 15A27), Djordjevic et al. (1014), Hecht and Hoffmann (1571, 1571a, 15A20), Hoffmann and Hecht (1727); Brunnemann and Hoffmann (15A03). 1984 Although their data showed that an increase in the nitrate content of cigarette tobacco reduced the MSS levels of FTC “tar”, nicotine, carbon monoxide, catechol, and B[a]P, Adams et al. (28) emphasized that significantly higher yields of volatile NNAs and TSNAs were found in the MSS of an 85-mm nonfiltered cigarettes whose nitrate contents were increased by sodium nitrate addition. Despite reductions in MSS levels of “tar”, nicotine, B[a]P, and catechol, Adams et al. considered that the “carcinogenic potential” of the whole MSS from the enhanced-nitrate cigarettes was increased primarily due to elevated yields of nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile NNAs, and TSNAs. They stressed the importance of the NOx as a precursor in the endogenous formation of NNAs during tobacco smoke inhalation. However, they ignored the fact that 1) only traces of nitrogen dioxide NO2 exist in cigarette MSS, 2) over 95% of its NOx content is nitric oxide, NO, and 3) other components in tobacco smoke reduce the nitric oxide-to-nitrogen dioxide conversion (NO→NO2) [Cooper (815), Cooper and Hege (816)]. On the basis of their findings. Adams et al. concluded: The findings of this study support the recommendation that the nitrate content of tobacco products should be reduced. 1984
Hoffmann et al. (1769) reported the following results from the MSS and SSS analyses of U.S. commercial cigarettes: Level Found, ng/cig
TSNA NNN NNK NAT
MSS 120-1000 80-770 140-1000
SSS 150-1700 170-410 150-270
In this study, subcutaneous injection of NNN (three levels: 9.0, 3.0, and 1.0 mmol/kg, thrice weekly for 20 weeks) into F344 rats showed a dose response with respect to nasal tumors (60% and 100% at the higher two levels) and carcinoma of the nasal cavity. Lung adenomas were observed at all three dose levels. In a parallel experiment with NNK, relatively high carcinogenicity in the rats was observed. They wrote: Perhaps the most important finding was that even the lowest dose of NNK induced a high percentage of lung tumors in males (85%) and a significant yield of lung tumors in females (30%). These lung tumors included squamous cell carcinomas. In an NAT experiment, similar to those for NNN and NNK, NAT was not carcinogenic at any of the three dose levels. 1986
IARC (1870) concluded that the TSNAs are the most abundant suspected carcinogens in tobacco smoke. It considered NNN and NNK to be proven carcinogens for laboratory animals. It considered the evidence limited for defining the carcinogenicity of NAB in laboratory animals and inadequate to label NAT as a carcinogen for laboratory animals.
1987
Adams et al. (31) presented data on the levels of TSNAs in MSSs and SSSs from different types of cigarette. TSNAs comprised NNN, NNK, NAB, and NAT. For the latter three, the per cigarette SSS levels substantially exceeded the MSS levels.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 702
11/13/08 7:15:00 PM
703
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-4 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines Year
Investigation
1987
Brunnemann et al. (469) identified a new TSNA 4-(N-methyl-nitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanol (iso-NNAL) in snuff and cigarette tobaccos. It was not detected in either cigarette MSS or SSS. In a study involving iso-NNAL, NNN, and NNK, LAVOIE et al. (15A34) determined the tumorigenicity of the three in mice. Klus et al. (15A32) measured several ETS-related TSNAs in indoor air of an 83-m3 office under various smoking conditions. NNN varied from 0.7 to 6 pg/L, NNK varied from 0.2 to 10.7 pg/L. They found no correlation with the carbon monoxide levels. Tricker et al. (3945) reported that nicotine was not N-nitrosated to NNN under simulated gastric conditions. However, nornicotine, anabasine, and anatabine were N-nitrosated to NNN, NAB, and NAT, respectively, under such conditions. They also reported that NNK decomposed slightly under these conditions. Hecht and Hoffmann (15A19) considered both NNN and NNK as powerful carcinogens because they induced benign and malignant tumors of the lung, nasal cavity, esophagus, pancreas and/or liver in mice, rats, and hamsters. Caldwell and Conner (573) reported:
1987 1988
1989 19891990
1990
The methodology previously reported [by others] leads to significant overestimation of NNA concentrations in cigarette smoke. The overestimations were true for both volatile NNAs and TSNAs in MSS and SSS for the Kentucky Reference Cigarette K1R4F used in their study: MSS data indicate the levels found were 380% high for NPYR and 83%, 38%, 27%, and 19% for NAB, NAT, NNK, and NNN, respectively. Thus, it is highly probable that the levels of NNAs in smoke tabulated in articles such as those by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) and frequently cited by the EPA and the Surgeon General are incorrect. Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) reviewed the evidence supporting the roles of various classes of tobacco smoke components in cancer induction by tobacco smoke. They concluded that PAHs and NNK are the major carcinogens involved in lung cancer induction by cigarette smoke. In their 1990 publication, they stated: These exposure estimates [for benzo[a]pyrene] and the determinations of the tumorigenic potential of [polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons] in bioassays strongly suggest that [polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons] play a significant role in the induction of respiratory tract cancer in smokers… Human exposure to [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)] is consistent with its potential role as a causative agent for lung cancer… These calculations [relating smoker exposure to 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) to dose level needed to induce respiratory tract tumors in hamsters], which ignore the probable endogenous formation of [4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)…], point to a significant risk for the smoker and strongly support the role of [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)] as an important etiological factor in lung cancer. However, they also noted: The organospecificity of [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)] for the lung is consistent with its role in tobacco smoke-induced respiratory carcinogenesis. The lung is the main target organ for [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)] administered [per os] or [subcutaneously] to rats and hamsters… Lung tumorsa have also been induced in mice after topical applications of high doses of [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)]… It has not been tested by inhalation.
1990
1991
a The tumor type was the adenoma, not the squamous cell carcinoma supposedly associated with cigarette smoking in smokers. In their list of 43 “tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke,” a list cited frequently in reports issued by various governmental agencies (EPA, USPHS), Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) listed three TSNAs: NNN, NNK, and NAB, the same three listed previously in 1986 by Hoffmann and Wynder (1808) and Iarc (1870) and subsequently by Hoffmann and his colleagues (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773) In the introduction to their publication on lung and pancreatic cancer, Hecht and Hoffmann (1571a) reiterated their previous conclusion on the role of PAHs and NNK in cancer causation in tobacco smokers:
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and NNK [4-(N-methyl-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone] are the major carcinogens involved in lung cancer induction by cigarette smoke and that NNK [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3pyridinyl)-1-butanone] is a likely candidate for induction of pancreatic cancer in smokers. 1992
Mimicking intragastric conditions, Caldwell et al. (575, 576) studied nicotine N-nitrosation and found it to be extremely slow. They concluded: It is unlikely that nicotine itself contributes to exposure to nitroso compounds [N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), 4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanal, and 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK)] due to chemically mediated intragastric nitrosation. (Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 703
11/13/08 7:15:00 PM
704
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-4 (Continued) A Brief Chronology of the Research on Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines Year
Investigation
Caldwell et al. confirmed, in part, the 1988 findings of Tricker et al. (3945) who had previously studied the potential endogenous formation of TSNAs under conditions simulating normal human gastric conditions. 1991- Brunnemann et al. (459, 460) sampled indoor air in bars, restaurants and trains; the levels found for NNN ranged from 0 to 23 1992 pg/L; for NNK, 1 to 29 pg/L; for NAT), 0 to 9 pg/L. 1992 In 1992 Chung et al. (793a) demonstrated that components, e.g., phenethyl isothiocyanate, indole-3-carbinol, in green tea and cruciferous vegetables inhibited lung tumorigenesis induced by NNK. 1993 Carmella et al. (15A05) identified 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) and its glucuronide in the urine of cigarette smokers, thus providing the first evidence for metabolites of TSNAs in human urine. No NNK was detected. Results with smokers’ urine were consistent with those found previously with monkeys’ urine. 1993 Hoffmann et al. (1773) again cited the list of 43 tumorigens in tobacco and smoke from Hoffmann and Hecht (1727). Despite the fact that in 1991, Hecht and Hoffmann (1571a) concluded that “polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and NNK [4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone] are the major carcinogens involved in lung cancer induction by cigarette smoke and that NNK is a likely candidate for induction of pancreatic cancer in smokers”, they listed NNK, NNN, and NNAL in this publication only as “likely causative agents for tobacco-related cancers.” 1993 Castonguay (15A07) described the inhibition in A/J mice of NNK-induced lung tumorigenesis by ellagic acid, a polyphenolic dilactone.
XV.D N-Nitrosamino Acids
tobacco users. Figure XV-3 is a plot of the chronology from 1983 through 2004 of TSNA-related references listed in our Reference section. It is obvious from the graphical depiction that the decade from the late 1980s to the late 1990s was a highly productive period for such studies. It is also obvious from the references in bold print that the American Health Foundation was a major contributor to our knowledge on TSNAs.
15A22a
15A16 15A08 Ref. 3179 No. 2728 15A43 1724 15A27 1559 15A17 1558 3184 1003 2990 667 2441 650 2437 99 1696 98 1694 29 660 22 25 1983
1984
2852 1746 1725 728 595 468 26 24 1985
15A44 15A34 15A04 656 469 379 324 70 15A23 67 15A21 65 2559b 64 657 63 99 62 36 33 1986
1987
3947 3945 3184 3180 2436 1571 572 508 19 1988
The results of several epidemiological studies suggested an association between the use of chewing tobacco or snuff and oral cancer. These products differ from smoking products (cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobaccos) in that they are not subjected to the high temperatures encountered in the smoking process. Thus, smokeless products contain little, if any, of the combustion products alleged to be significant
15A56 15A20 15A19 15A06 15A03 3954 3181 4405 3948 2995 3944 3374 1770 3182 3373 1688 2994 2917b 1198 2235 2674 1197 1771 1676 1193 1750 1196 1191 1571a 1195 1036 1200 1194 1014 1199 1192 995 1013 1012 720 486 1002 573 484 573 484 464 547 483 459 543 326 325 466 205 202 204 201 76 1989
1990
1991
Reference numbers listed in bold print represent conference presentations and/or journal publications by Hoffmann and his American Health Foundation colleagues.
aReferences
3953 2168 1777 1005 739a 549 542 501 487 463 460 1992
Year
listed as 15A22, etc. may be found in the Bibliography at the end of the text and are listed as additional references to Chapter 15. 15A45 4128 4077 3943b 3342 3816 15A05 2916 3176a 4129 3177 2915 2917 3343 2996 2637 1305 2700 2992 4161 2561 1304 2638 1702 2997 2051 951 2618 1573a 2993 1988 557 2588 1562a 1775 2943a 1016 505 2362 554 502 2169 1011 279 2052 313 59 1001 670 50 507 1993– 1994
1995– 1996
1997– 1998
1999– 2000
2001– 2002
2003– 2004
Figure XV-3 References pertinent to tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines, 1983 to 2004.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 704
11/13/08 7:15:02 PM
N-Nitrosamines
tumorigens, for example, the PAHs and their N-containing analogs, in tobacco smoke. As a result, snuff and chewing tobacco NNAs became suspect because they were the only components known to be laboratory animal tumorigens. Preformed NNAs in these tobacco products and NNAs endogenously formed in the product users were considered by many to be the causal factor for oral cancer in snuff dippers [Hoffmann and Adams (1677), Brunnemann et al. (507a, 510, 15A04), Hoffmann et al. (1684, 1697, 1707, 1713, 1722), Hecht et al. (15A23), Adams et al. (33), Prokopczyk et al. (15A44), Carmella et al. (15A06), Tsuda and Kurashima (15A56), Djordjevic et al. (1008)] and in tobacco chewers [Brunnemann et al. (468, 498), Wenke et al. (15A58), Hoffmann et al. (1730, 1731), IARC (1869), Prokopczyk et al. (2995), Tsuda and Kurashima (15A56)]. In studies to elucidate the possible tumorigens in chewing tobacco and snuff, the only known components tumorigenic in laboratory animals identified were various NNAs, particularly the TSNAs NNN and NNK plus a group of N-nitrosamino acids, including NPRO. Whereas discussions and investigations on volatile NNAs [Druckrey and Preussmann (1057), Serfontein and Hurter (3595–3599)] and several TSNAs NNN, NAB [Boyland et al. (422, 423)] have appeared in the literature for over four decades, reports on identifications of N-nitrosamino acids are much more recent. Ohshima et al. (2852) identified several N-nitrosamino acids, 3-(methylnitrosamino)propanoic acid [also known as Nmethyl-N-nitroso-β-alanine (NMPA)], 4-(methylnitrosamino) butanoic acid (NMBA), and 1-nitroso-2-piperidinecarboxylic acid (also known as N-nitrosopipecolic acid), in various types of tobacco (cigarette, chewing, pipe, cigar, and snuff tobaccos). Decarboxylation of these N-nitrosamino acids would yield NEMA, N-nitrosomethylpropylamine, and NPIP. IARC (1986) did note the 1985 Ohshima et al. findings on these N-nitrosamino acids in tobacco. Following their identification of several N-nitrosamino acids in snuff, Djordjevic et al. (992) investigated these acids in 1R1 and 1R4F reference tobaccos from the University of Kentucky. In addition to detecting 4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanol (iso-NNAL), 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanal, and the common TSNAs, the following N-nitrosamino acids were identified: 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)butanoic acid (iso-NNAC), 4-(methylnitrosamino)butanoic acid (NMBA), 3-(methylnitrosamino)propanoic acid (N-methylN-nitroso-β-alanine; NMPA), 2-(methylnitrosamino)acetic acid (N-methyl-N-nitrosoglycine, N-nitrosarcosine (NSAR), 1-nitroso-2-piperidinecarboxylic acid, and NPRO. Djordjevic et al. considered these NNA compounds important in cancer causation, particularly in snuff and chewing tobacco users. Djordjevic et al. (992) confirmed the findings of Ohshima et al. (2852) on the presence of N-nitrosamino acids in tobacco. In addition to the N-nitrosamino acids identified by Ohshima et al., Djordjevic et al. identified 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanoic acid (iso-NNAC). The highest concentrations of these N-nitrosamino acids were found in snuffs and black tobacco. They also identified 3-(methylnitrosamino)
705
propanoic acid (NMPA) in tobacco and MSS and estimated its transfer from tobacco to MSS to be 0.85%. In studies with N-nitrosamino acid-spiked cigarettes, Brunnemann et al. (466) reported that added NMPA did not completely decarboxylate. Some was esterified to the methyl ester. Some of the intact acid, its methyl ester, and its decarboxylation product, NEMA, appeared in the MSS. Similar to NMBA, some NMBA transferred intact from the tobacco to the MSS, some formed the methyl ester, which appeared in the MSS, and some decarboxylated to yield N-nitrosomethylpropylamine, which also appeared in the MSS. NPRO primarily decarboxylated to NPYR. NSAR primarily decarboxylated to NDMA. Djordjevic et al. (1012) identified 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanoic acid (iso-NNAC) in tobacco and in MSS. This acid was found only in the MSS from cigarettes containing tobacco spiked (2 mg/cigarette) with cotinine. From the results of in vitro nitrosation studies with radiolabeled cotinine and nicotine, Djordjevic et al. (995) proposed that the formation of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)4-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanoic acid (iso-NNAC) in tobacco proceeds via cotinine and its hydrolysis product 4-methyl-4(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanoic acid rather than via nicotine. Brunnemann et al. (464) presented a more detailed exposition of their 1989 findings on the fate in “spiked” cigarettes of several N-nitrosamino acids [2-(methylnitrosamino) acetic acid (NSAR), 3-(methylnitrosamino)propanoic acid (NMPA), 4-(methylnitrosamino)butanoic acid (NMBA), and N-nitrosoproline (NPRO)]. These acids are delivered intact to MSS, undergo esterification to the methyl ester and are delivered as such to MSS, and/or decarboxylate and are delivered to MSS as the NNAs NDMA, NEMA, NMPA, and NPYR, respectively. Djordjevic et al. (1013) described in greater detail their identification of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridinyl)1-butanoic acid (iso-NNAC) in tobacco and in MSS. They reported that iso-NNAC was found only in the smoke from cigarettes containing cotinine-spiked tobacco (2 mg/ cigarette) [see Djordjevic et al. (1012)]. Djordjevic et al. (1005, 1008) identified three new N-nitrosamino acids in snuff tobacco: 2-(methyl-nitrosamino)-3-phenylpropanoic acid, 2,5-di(methylnitrosamino)pentanoic acid, and 2,6di(methylnitrosamino)hexanoic acid. They discussed not only the identification of the three new N-nitrosamino acids but also the carcinogenic potential of these and other N-nitrosamino acids, particularly in the context of tobacco chewing or snuff dipping. Djordjevic et al. (993) reported that the levels of N-nitrosamino acids in snuff tobaccos were often 150 times those found in cigarette tobaccos (usually about 1 ppm). Examination of the results of the studies on N-nitrosamino acids in tobacco smoke reveals the importance of amino acids (and their precursors, the tobacco proteins) in N-nitrosamino acid formation before and during the smoking process. Figure XV-4 illustrates some of the relationships among the amino acids, N-nitrosamino acids, their methyl esters, and N-nitrosamines.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 705
11/13/08 7:15:03 PM
706
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
H2N-(CH2)n-COOH
XVIII
COOH
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)n-COOCH3 XXII
COOH N
NH2 H3C-NH-(CH2)n-COOH XIX
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)n-COOH XX
HOOC-CH(NH2)-(CH2)n–1-COOH H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)n-H XXIII
XXI
H2N-(CH2)n-CH(NH2)-COOH
XXVIII
N H
COOH XXVIII
R-(CH2)n-CH(R)-COOH
n = 4 (-NH3) XXXII
XXV
XXVII
NO XXIX
NH XXXII
COOCH3
N NO
COOH
N
XXX
N NO
XXXI
COOH
COOH
where R = H3C-N(NO)-
XXIV n = 3 (-NH3)
XXVI
NO
N
NO
XXXIII
N
NO XXXIV
Figure XV-4 Relationships among amino acids, N-nitrosamino acids, their esters, and N-nitrosamines.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 706
11/13/08 7:15:07 PM
N-Nitrosamines
XV.E Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines: An Exception among the Major MSS Toxicants Since the mid-1950s various MSS toxicants, either as an individual component or a class of components, have had their moment of publicity but one by one their importance gradually faded. Chronologically, the first toxicants to become infamous were the tumorigenic PAHs, with B[a]P at the pinnacle because of its potent tumorigenicity to mouse skin and its per cigarette MSS yield. The chronology of the rise to notoriety of the various individual and/or class of toxicants has been previously depicted [see Figure 1 in Rodgman et al. (3307)] but not shown is when the prominence of most of them declined. In the mouse skin-painting bioassay, neither B[a]P nor the total tumorigenic PAHs accounted for the observed specific tumorigenicity (4354). The B[a]P content of CSC accounted for less than 2.5% and the total tumorigenic PAH content of CSC accounted for less than 3.5% of the CSC specific tumorigenicity [1056, 4312, see p. 626 in (4332)]. Inclusion of tumorigenic aza-arenes reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027) did not improve the situation. Hoffmann and Wynder (1798) reported that doubling or tripling the level of seventeen tumorigenic PAHs in CSC significantly increased the percent tumor-bearing animals (% TBA), whereas others reported that a 10-fold (3311) or 30-fold (2320) increase in the B[a]P level in CSC produced no change in the % TBA. In the early 1960s, the promoting effect of MSS phenols on tumorigenic PAHs was advanced to explain the tumorigenic response observed in CSC-painted mice. Inclusion of this effect in the assessment accounted for about 5% of the % TBA. In addition, reports of no change in the tumorigenicity of CSC when significant amounts (75% to 90%) of the phenols were removed from MSS (and the CSC) by selective filtration [see p. 626 in (55), 4344] and the inhibition of the specific tumorigenicity of B[a]P by phenol (149) diminished the alleged importance of the promoting effect of phenols. To offset the decrease in importance of the PAHs, azaarenes, and phenols, ciliastatic components in MSS then became the in-vogue toxicants. It was asserted, based on studies with clam cilia and mammalian ciliated tissue, that certain MSS toxicants impair lung ciliary activity, thus preventing removal of tumorigen-containing smoke particles from the lung. MSS components proposed as significant ciliastats included formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, HCN, formic and acetic acids, and phenol. However, after the reported findings of Dalhamn et al. in 1968, the ciliary assertion faded because of the demonstration that less than a third of the ciliastats reach the lung cilia in human smokers (892, 893). In the mid-1960s, several other MSS toxicants had their brief moment of infamy, for example, 210Po, NO2, CO, Ni. In their comparison of lung cancer incidence in uranium miners exposed to 210Po vs. cigarette smokers exposed to MSS 210Po, Harley et al. (75) questioned the significance of 210Po in tobacco-induced lung cancer. Concern over NO2 diminished with the demonstration that over 95% of the NOx in MSS was
707
NO, not NO2, and the conversion of NO to NO2 was impeded by other MSS components (94). In the early 1960s, the formation of NNAs during tobacco smoking was suggested (423) as well as the possible presence of NNN and NAB in MSS (423, 3313). Between 1964 and the early 1970s, several volatile NNAs were identified in MSS. It was also reported that 60% to 85% of the volatile NNAs, like the phenols, are selectively filtered from MSS (514, 1236, 1761, 2635). The identification of several TSNAs, including NNN and NAB, then followed. Why have TSNAs maintained their status as important MSS toxicants while the importance of other individual and/ or classes of toxicants has faded? Alternate exposures are possible with toxicant classes other than the TSNAs, including NNAs, but the TSNAs, as defined, are “tobacco-specific.” In other words, no alternate exposure exists for TSNAs. In the detailed 1984 outline of chemical carcinogenesis edited by Searle (3568), the only class of MSS tumorigens discussed in 22 chapters comprising nearly 1400 pages was the NNAs [see pp. 839–844 in Preusmann and Eisenbrand (2990)]. Most of the data cited [see Tables VII to IX, pp. 841, 843, 844 in (2990)], are those from publications by Hoffmann and his colleagues (514, 1677, 1680, 1685). Since the early 1960s, a “less hazardous” cigarette has been defined on the basis of three criteria: (1) the per cigarette delivery of a specific toxicant has been lowered, (2) the ratio of the specific toxicant to MSS “tar” has been lowered, and (3) the specific tumorigenicity of the MSS “tar” as measured in the mouse skin-painting bioassay has been lowered. From bioassay results of more than 330 NNAs plus knowledge of fewer than sixty specific NNAs in MSS, it is obvious that the MSS NNAs cannot meet criterion (3). Over 330 N-nitroso compounds variously administered to forty different species have been reported as tumorigenic. No laboratory species is resistant to NNAs. In their summary of the results from 323 N-nitroso compounds bioassayed from 1956 to 1984, Preussmann and Stewart (2991) reported that 87% of the N-nitroso compounds are tumorigenic. Over 70% of the N-nitroso compounds studied were NNAs; the remainder were N-nitrosamides. Administration of most NNAs to laboratory animals via skin painting seldom results in carcinoma induction at the application site. Generally, tumors develop at site(s) remote from the painting site and various organs may be involved. This major difference between PAH and NNA tumorigenicity led to defining NNAs as organ-specific tumorigens. Failure to produce tumors with NNAs at the painting site subsequently led to studies of NNAs administered by alternate routes (injection [subcutaneous, intravenous, intraperitoneal], per os, intratracheal instillation, etc.). Administration of NNAs by inhalation was studied infrequently. Skin-painting studies with six NNAs (N-nitrosobutylmethylamine, NDEA, NDELA, iso-NNAL, NNK, NNN) present in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke were reported by Brune and Henning (15A02), F. Hoffmann and Graffi (15A30), Herrold (15A24), Herrold and Dunham (15A25), IARC (1870),
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 707
11/13/08 7:15:07 PM
708
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Hoffmann et al. (1786a), and LaVoie et al. (15A34). Tumors developed elsewhere in the test animals but none at the painting site. In a painting study by Deutsch-Wenzel et al. (956a), NNN induced a few skin tumors, but no dose-response relationship was observed over a 12.5- to 200-µg range. In the same study, the tumorigenic potency to skin of N-nitrosoN-methylurea was estimated to be about 4% of that of B[a] P. In painting studies with N-nitroso-N-alkylureas, tumors did develop at the skin-painting site, but to date, no N-nitroso-Nalkylurea has been identified in tobacco or MSS.
XV.F Direct Transfer of TSNAs from Tobacco vs. Their Formation during the Smoking Process Nicotine, nornicotine, anabasine, and anatabine are precursors of TSNAs in tobacco and tobacco smoke (29, 1564). Both nicotine and nornicotine are considered to be NNN precursors. Since NNAs (both volatile and tobacco-specific) occur in tobacco, part of the NNAs in cigarette MSS was reported to be due to direct transfer of NNAs from tobacco to MSS, the remainder due to formation and transport during the smoking process (201). For NNK, the transfer from tobacco to MSS ranges from 6.9% to 11.0% of the amount in the tobacco; this represents about 30% of the NNK in MSS. Similarly, about 40% of the NNN in MSS is transferred from the tobacco. Hoffmann et al. maintain that the remainder of NNN and NNK in MSS is formed during the smoking process (1558, 1734). Both the levels of volatile NNAs and TSNAs in MSS are proportional to the nitrate content of the tobacco filler (3985). However, the premise of the pyrogenesis of NNN and NNK has been challenged by Fischer et al. (1193, 1199), who reported that these compounds occur in cigarette MSS only by transfer from the tobacco rod. Castonguay (15A07) stated that NNK is transferred from tobacco to smoke during the smoking process. In agreement with Fischer et al., Renaud et al. (15A46) concluded that direct tobacco-to-smoke transfer was the dominant factor explaining the presence of TSNAs in MSS. From their study of the contribution of 13C-nicotine
to 13C-NNN and 13C-NNK levels in MSS CSC, Moldoveanu et al. concluded that NNN and NNK are generated during the smoking process (2599), thus contradicting the views of Fischer et al. (1193, 1199), Castonguay (15A07), and Renaud et al. (15A46). Moreover, the pyrogenesis situation was further clouded by data on the effect of tobacco nitrate on the MSS TSNA yields (1552). Analysis of MSS TSNAs indicated that NNN and NAT yields increased when nitrate was added to the tobacco but the NNK yield did not.
XV.G Infrequently Studied Tobacco and/or Smoke Secondary Amines and Their N-Nitrosamines During extensive investigations of the composition of tobacco smoke in general and cigarette MSS in particular, much effort was expended in the early 1960s to define the nature of N-nitrosation during curing and the smoking process. As more and more N-nitrosamines (NNAs) were identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke, they were categorized as follows: volatile NNAs, nonvolatile NNAs, TSNAs, and N-nitrosamino acids. Within these four categories, only about sixty NNAs have been identified to date as tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components. Except for an excursion into the identification of N-nitrosamino acids, identification of NNAs in MSS almost ceased when NNK and to some extent NNN became the toxicants of choice. This situation raises the question, If a detailed study similar to those conducted on the PAHs and aza-arenes were conducted, how many additional NNAs could be identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke? Table XV-5 lists several NNAs reported as tobacco components that are seldom discussed. To date, none of them has been identified in tobacco smoke. While Table XV-6 is not necessarily complete, it suffices for the following discussion. In Table XV-6 are listed twenty-two dialkylamines, identified in tobacco and/or smoke as the amine or the NNA. For four NNAs (N-nitrosoisobutylmethylamine, N-nitrosoethylpropylamine,
Table XV-5 N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Identified in Smoke (S) and/or Tobacco (T) N-Nitrosamines 1-Nitroso-2-azetidinecarboxylic acid 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)butanone oxide 1-Nitroso-4-hydroxyproline 1-Nitroso-3-piperidinecarboxylic acid 1-Nitroso-4-piperidinecarboxylic acid 3-Nitroso-4-thiazolidinecarboxylic acid a b
CAS No.
S
T
55556-98-4 76014-82-9 2443-30-3 65445-62-7 6238-69-3 88381-44-6
— — — — — —
+ + + + + +
Activity yesa
no [173]b
Bioassay results reported by Castonguay et al. (15A08) Bioassay results in laboratory animals are summarized in Preussmann and Stewart (2991); yes = tumor induction, no = negative response. Number in [] represents catalog number in Preussmann and Stewart (2991).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 708
11/13/08 7:15:08 PM
709
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-6 Aliphatic Secondary Amines and Volatile N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke R | R1-N-R2 R1 =
R2 =
CH3CH3CH3CH3CH3CH3CH3CH3CH3CH2CH3CH2CH3CH2CH3CH2CH3CH3(CH2)2CH3(CH2)2CH3(CH2)2(CH3)2CH(CH3)2CHCH3(CH2)3CH3(CH2)3(CH3)(C2H5)CH(CH3)3C-
CH3CH3CH2CH3(CH2)2(CH3)2CHCH3(CH2)3(CH3)2CHCH2(CH3)(C2H5)CH(CH3)2CH(CH2)2CH2=C(CH3)CH2CH3CH3(CH2)2(CH3)2CHCH2CH3(CH2)3CH3(CH2)2(CH3)2CH(CH3)(C2H5)CH(CH3)2CHCH3(CH2)3CH3(CH2)3(CH3)2CHCH2(CH3)(C2H5)CH(CH3)2CH-
a b
R=H Identified in Smoke (S) or Tobacco (T) CAS No. 124-40-3 624-78-2 627-35-0 4747-21-1 110-68-9
22023-64-9 109-89-7 20193-20-8 13360-63-9 142-84-7 21968-17-2 108-18-9 39099-23-5 111-92-2 20810-06-4 626-23-3
R = NO Identified in Smoke (S) or Tobacco (T)
S
T
CAS No.
S
T
+ + + + + — + + + + — — — + + + + + — + — +
+ + + + + — — — — + — — — + + — — — + — + —
62-75-9a 10595-95-6a 924-46-9
+ + + + + + — — — + + + + + — — + — + + — —
+ + + — — — — — — + + + — + — — — — + — — —
7068-83-9a 2504-18-9
55-18-5 a 25413-61-0 71607-99-3 621-64-7 a
601-77-4 924-16-3 a
Biological Activity yes [1]b yes [52]b yes [66]b yes [71]b
yes [7]b
yes [122]b yes [21] b
yes [34]b yes [36]b yes [45]b
Compound listed as a toxicant in one or more lists published since 1986 (1217, 1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808, 1870, 2825). Bioassay results in laboratory animals are summarized in Preussmann and Stewart (2991); yes = tumor induction, no = negative response. Number in [] is catalog number in Preussmann and Stewart (2991).
N-nitrosoethylisobutylamine, N-nitroso-n-butylethylamine), the corresponding amines have not been identified in tobacco smoke. It is highly probable that the four amines are present as MSS components. Alternatively, NNAs corresponding to the other ten dialkylamines identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke have not yet been identified in smoke, for example, no NNA corresponding to sec-butylmethylamine, isopentylmethylamine, or isopropylidenemethylamine identified as MSS components has been identified in MSS. Synthetically, the corresponding NNAs are as easily prepared as N-nitrosodimethylamine or N-nitrosodiethylamine so their pyrogenesis during the smoking process should not be hindered. Thus, it is highly probable that the ten NNAs are present in tobacco smoke. Many other secondary amines have been identified in tobacco smoke but for most of them no corresponding NNA has been identified in smoke. These include a series of N-substituted anilines, all amenable to N-nitrosation {XXXV}. Others include the alkyl derivatives of pyrrolidine {XXXVI}, piperazine {XXXVII}, and piperidine {XXXVIII}. The amines pyrrolidine {XXXVI}, piperazine {XXXVII}, and 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine {XXXIX} have been identified in cigarette MSS but not piperazine {XXXVII} (see structures in Table XV-7). For each piperazine, mono- and
di-N-nitroso derivatives are possible. Morpholine {XL} and an alkyl derivative have also been identified in tobacco. For completeness, azetidine {XLI} is included in Table XV-7. In many instances, the NNAs listed in Table XV-7 are readily synthesized and have been tested for tumorigenicity in laboratory animals [see Preussmann and Stewart (2991)]. Table XV-7 lists forty-six secondary amines, most of which have been identified as components of tobacco and/or its smoke. In only a few cases have the corresponding NNAs been identified as tobacco and/or smoke components. It is highly probable that the NNAs corresponding to the remaining secondary amines may also be tobacco smoke components. Among the numerous classes of smoke components are several other types of secondary amines, for example, the pyrroles, indoles, carbazoles, and imidazoles. However, their highly aromatic nature and the acidity of the imino hydrogen probably preclude any significant N-nitrosation either in the tobacco or during the smoking process. Despite the fact that a dozen or so theoretically N-nitrosatable substituted pyrroles; nearly fifty alkyl derivatives of indole {XLII}; carbazole {XLIII} and several of its alkyl derivatives, benzocarbazoles, and dibenzocarbazoles; and several alkyl derivatives of imidazole and benzimidazole {XLIV}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 709
11/13/08 7:15:09 PM
710
have been identified in tobacco smoke, no NNA corresponding to any of them has been identified to date in tobacco smoke (Figure XV-5). It is obvious that the number of NNAs in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke might be substantially greater than the sixty
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
or so NNAs now known to be present. Since the per cigarette yields of the yet unidentified NNAs may be at the picogram or femtogram levels, their contribution to MSS toxicological properties may not be particularly meaningful or important. However, they may be just as important from a biological
Table XV-7 Aromatic and Cyclic Secondary Amines and N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 710
11/13/08 7:15:11 PM
711
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-7 (Continued) Aromatic and Cyclic Secondary Amines and N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
point of view as those MSS components repeatedly listed as toxicants for which no or questionable quantitative data are available, for example, the much discussed dibenzo[def,p] chrysene (dibenzo[a,l]pyrene) (1557, 1727, 1740, 1741, 1743). To put the NNAs in perspective and to determine how many more are actually present in MSS, what may be needed is an extensive study corresponding to the excellent studies on PAHs (3756–3758) and aza-arenes (3750) conducted and
reported by U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) personnel in the late 1970s and early 1980s. It is also interesting to note that 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL), the major metabolite of NNK (1557), is usually not listed as a cigarette MSS toxicant even though NNAL has been reported to be both tumorigenic to several rodent species (15A08) and mutagenic in the Ames Salmonella typhimurium test.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 711
11/13/08 7:15:16 PM
712
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
7
H N
6
2
5
3
4
1
8
7
2
N 2
3
6 5
XLII
9 N H XLIII
N H
4 XLIV
Figure XV-5 Indole {XLII}, carbazole {XLIII}, and 1H-benzimidazole {XLIV}.
XV.H Flue-Curing and TobaccoSpecific N-Nitrosamines As described by Williams (4247) there is general agreement among tobacco scientists that TSNAs are not present in either freshly harvested, that is, green flue-cured and burley tobaccos. As the tobaccos are cured either by air curing in the case of burley or in heated barns for flue-cured varieties, the amounts of TSNAs rise to their final levels. In the case of air curing, the process has changed little over the past fifty years. However, for flue curing, the process changed drastically in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s due to the introduction of energy-efficient bulk-curing barns heated by exhaust gases of liquid propane gas or similar burners. It is at this point that a breakdown must have occurred between tobacco agriculturists and chemists. The emission of NO2 during the combustion of liquid propane or natural gas is well known. In fact, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) has electronic spreadsheets available for download from its Web site that North Carolina industries may use in estimating their NO2 emissions during natural gas or liquid propane combustion. In retrospect, any competent chemist would predict the potential nitrosation of tobacco alkaloids during flue curing in the presence of combustion exhaust gases. However, without the knowledge of TSNA formation during direct heating of green tobaccos, the agricultural community adopted the new energy-efficient technique. It appears that prior to this “technological advance,” the formation of TSNAs during flue curing by traditional methods was not a problem. Earlier, at least two research groups discovered the problem with direct-heating flue curing of tobacco. Peele et al. (2917) demonstrated that modification of the curing process for flue-cured tobacco permitted significant control of its TSNA levels. The curing process was altered from one involving direct-fired burners to one involving a heat exchange system. During approximately the same period, Williams (258) applied for and was granted a U.S. patent on essentially the same modification of the flue-curing barns to achieve the same significant reduction in TSNAs. An example of the TSNA reductions in flue-cured tobacco and its smoke was shown by Rodgman and Green [see Figure 3, p. 522 in (3300)]. The tobacco data were from Williams (4247), the smoke data from Doolittle et al. (1051).
During the past few years, advances have been made to reduce NNAs, specifically TSNAs, in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The agronomic community with the help of the tobacco industry has made significant headway in discontinuing direct heating for flue curing as a means to reduce TSNAs in tobacco and tobacco smoke. This advancement is desirable from a product stewardship perspective and has little if any effect on tobacco quality. Biological response data on individual TSNAs indicate that TSNAs play a minor role in MSS carcinogenesis [see Tables 1 and 5 in Rodgman and Green (3300)]. Comparisons of the biological effects (Neutral Red cytotoxicity, mutagenicity in the Ames test with several Salmonella typhimurium strains) of mainstream CSCs from flue-cured tobacco cigarettes with normal and reduced levels of TSNAs, indicated no significant difference between the biological activity of the two CSCs [Doolittle et al. (1051)]. Although the Doolittle et al. data appear to support the hypothesis on a whole-smoke basis that mainstream TSNAs are of relatively minor toxicological importance, the sensitivity of the Ames assay is not sufficient to differentiate between the cigarettes tested. For example, consider the following points published by Doolittle et al. (1051): • The minimum amount of NNK needed for a mutagenic response in the Ames assay is 200 µg. • The maximum amount of CSC that can be tested is 250 µg. • In 250 µg of CSC there is 1.33 and 0.13 ng of NNK from direct-fired and heat-exchanged flue-cured tobacco, respectively. • The amount of NNK in the CSC from either fluecured tobacco smoke is too low for a response. Every practical effort should be made to reduce the amounts of alleged human carcinogens from tobacco products. However, whether the reduction or elimination of TSNAs from MSS will result in a “less hazardous” cigarette is unknown. Table XV-8 lists the sixty-seven N-nitrosamines identified to date in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Of these fifty-three N-nitrosamines have been identified in smoke, fifty-one in tobacco, and thirty-seven in both.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 712
11/13/08 7:15:17 PM
713
N-Nitrosamines
Table XV-8 N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 713
11/13/08 7:15:24 PM
714
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 714
11/13/08 7:15:26 PM
N-Nitrosamines
715
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 715
11/13/08 7:15:28 PM
716
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 716
11/13/08 7:15:29 PM
N-Nitrosamines
717
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 717
11/13/08 7:15:39 PM
718
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 718
11/13/08 7:15:44 PM
N-Nitrosamines
719
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 719
11/13/08 7:15:46 PM
720
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XV-8 (Continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C015.indd 720
11/13/08 7:15:48 PM
16
Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols
In his 1954 catalog of tobacco smoke components, Kosak (2170) listed no organic nitro-containing component. In 1959, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971), in their compilation of tobacco and tobacco smoke components, also listed no organic nitro-containing component. In their 1964 review (4319) and 1967 book (4332) on tobacco smoke carcinogenicity, Wynder and Hoffmann did not mention a nitroalkane or a nitroarene. In his 1968 review, Stedman (3797) listed no organic nitro-containing component identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke composition. His list of the agricultural chemicals used in tobacco agronomy [see Table XVI in (3797] also contained no nitro-containing compound. In their review of the N-containing components in tobacco and smoke, Schmeltz and Hoffmann listed thirty nitro components [see Table X in (3491)] separated into six nitroalkanes identified by Hoffmann and Rathkamp (1755) and Rathkamp et al. (3086) in the late 1960s, eight monocyclic nitroarenes identified by Hoffmann and Rathkamp in 1970 (1758), and sixteen nitrophenols, including one nitronaphthol, reported by Klus and Kuhn in 1975 (2137). In their 1980 catalog (1884), Ishiguro and Sugawara also listed thirty nitro components in tobacco smoke. All the nitro components they listed were those tabulated in the 1977 article by Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491). With the limiting analytical technology available in 1982, Lee et al. (2329) at the American Health Foundation reported that they were unable to measure significant quantities of 4-nitro-1,2-benzenediol (4-nitrocatechol) in cigarette MSS. El-Bayoumy et al. in a conference presentation (1122) and a journal publication (1124) reported that 1-nitronaphthalene, 1-nitropyrene, and 6-nitrochrysene, if present in cigarette smoke, were at yields lower than their analytical capability. In its 1986 monograph on tobacco smoking, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) discussed many of the details of N-nitrosamines and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco smoke. Despite the reports prior to 1985 on the identification in tobacco smoke of many nitro components (1755, 1758, 2137, 3086), IARC listed only one nitro compound, 2-nitropropane, as a biologically active smoke component [see Table 19, pp. 86–87 in (1870)]. In its listing of the evaluation of tobacco smoke components for
carcinogenicity, IARC defined the evidence in 1986 of the carcinogenicity in animals and humans of 2-nitropropane as sufficient [see Appendix 2, p. 393 in (1870)]. Hoffmann and Wynder (1808) included 2-nitropropane in their list of major toxic and tumorigenic agents in nonfiltered cigarette MSS. Although not dealing with cigarette smoke in this particular 1987 study, Grimmer et al. (1406a) identified 1-nitropyrene in diesel exhaust. Of the many nitro components in tobacco smoke, only nitrobenzene, nitromethane, and 2-nitropropane were discussed repeatedly since 1986. In reports dealing primarily with commercial cigarettes, these three nitroalkanes were listed periodically in various publications as toxic smoke components, biologically active smoke components, tumorigenic smoke components, or carcinogenic smoke components: nitrobenzene (1741, 1743, 1744), nitromethane (1743, 1744), 2-nitropropane (1217, 1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808, 2825). 2-Nitropropane was also described as a known carcinogen in the MSS from all-flue-cured or all-burley cigarettes (1716). In 2003, Cheng et al. (692, 693) reported the identification in CSC of five nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. They included 1-and 4-nitropyrene, 1,6- and 1,8-dinitropyrene, and 6-nitrochrysene. In 2004, Cheely et al. (683) described an analytical procedure that enabled the identification of 1-nitronaphthalene, 1-nitropyrene, and 6-nitrochrysene in cigarette MSS. Although 2-nitropropane was much discussed as a tumorigen or carcinogen in cigarette smoke and its categorization by IARC as having yielded sufficient evidence to rate it as both an animal and a human carcinogen, it seldom was designated as a “Hoffmann analyte.” While it did not use the term “Hoffmann analyte” in its report, the Department of Health (Canada) proposed that analytical data on the per cigarette yields of over forty components in tobacco smoke should be a requirement to indicate the hazardous nature of cigarette smoke (16A01). No nitroalkane was included in its list. Neither nitrobenzene nor nitromethane appeared in any “Hoffmann analyte” list. Table XVI-1 lists the nitroalkanes, nitroarenes, and nitrophenols identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke.
721
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C016.indd 721
11/13/08 5:34:31 PM
722
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVI-1 Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C016.indd 722
11/13/08 5:34:32 PM
Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols
723
Table XVI-1 (Continued) Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C016.indd 723
11/13/08 5:34:40 PM
724
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVI-1 (Continued) Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C016.indd 724
11/13/08 5:34:42 PM
Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols
725
Table XVI-1 (Continued) Nitroalkanes, Nitroarenes, and Nitrophenols in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C016.indd 725
11/13/08 5:34:44 PM
17
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
XVII.A Monocyclic FourAND Five-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds XVII.A.1 Background Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) is a unique agricultural crop used to prepare a variety of commercial products (cigarettes, pipe tobacco, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff, etc.). Consumers enjoy tobacco by placing it into their mouth or nasal cavity (in the case of oral and snuff products) or by lighting the tobacco article (cigarette, cigarillo, cigar, etc.) and inhaling the tobacco smoke produced. As a result, the chemical composition of both the leaf and the tobacco smoke are important to consumers (for its flavor and appeal) and to scientists attempting to understand the chemical organoleptic, pharmacological, and toxicological properties of this extremely complex consumer product. Tobacco is a natural product that contains numerous classes of chemical compounds. As a living entity, tobacco contains all of the complex biological machinery necessary to sustain life. Chemical constituents in the tobacco leaf are influenced by numerous factors as the tobacco plant develops from seed to cured leaf. These factors include genetic potential, environmental conditions, cultural practices, and curing methods. Interactions among the factors also influence the chemical composition of the cured leaf. The genetic makeup of the plant provides the potential to produce or not to produce certain compounds, the realization of these potentials depend on environmental variations that the plant endures during growth and processing conditions employed to manufacture the finished tobacco product (677a). Although the chemical composition of the tobacco leaf is important, tobacco smoke also contains an extensive variety of chemical compounds. The presence and relative concentrations of these tobacco smoke components depend on (1) the composition of the tobacco leaf, (2) tobacco additives, (3) manufacturing processes, (4) the physical form and materials used to construct the different smoking articles, and (5) the smoking procedure. An elemental analysis for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in foods and tobacco indicates that there is only about 5% nitrogen in dry tobacco (2439). The percent carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen (by difference) of dry tobacco leaf are about 43, 6, and 43%, respectively (2798), with the remainder being trace levels of metals and nonmetals. The majority of the nitrogen in tobacco leaf resides in the proteins, alkaloids, nitrates, and amino acids. The N-containing compounds in tobacco leaf have often been associated with the quality of the leaf. This is especially true with burley tobacco (3973). Nitrogenous
compounds in tobacco and smoke have an enormous range of taste and odor quality and intensity. Many are odorless and tasteless (proteins, nitrates), some have extremely pleasant tastes and odors, for example, some pyrazines (2439) and imidazoles, while others are very strong, pungent, and offensive, for example, some pyridines (1803). In this section, we present information on four- and five-membered N-containing ring compounds identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. The classes of compounds include azetidines, pyrrolidines, 2- and 3-pyrrolines, pyrroles, pyrazoles, imidazolidines, imidazolines, imidazoles, and 1,2,4-triazoles (Figure XVII.A-1).
XVII.A.2 Four-Membered N-Containing Rings Few four-membered N-containing ring compounds have been identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke. These compounds are classified as azetidines. Nicotianamine, first isolated from tobacco by Noma et al. in 1971 (2796a), has also been identified in numerous other plant species (3528a). Nicotianamine is a derivative of 2-azetidinecarboxylic acid, an amino acid identified in numerous plant species, including Nicotiana tabacum (2330b). The precursor for the biosynthesis of azetidine in tobacco and azetidine-2-carboxylic acid, in particular, is considered to be methionine (2330b). The bacterial plant pathogen tabtoxin (L-threonine, N-[2-amino-4-(3-hydroxy-2-oxo-3azetidinyl)-1-oxobutyl]-) was isolated from wildfire tobacco (a wild species of Nicotiana tabacum) in 1971 (3819a). The scant information on azetidine compounds can be found in several review articles on the chemistry of compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In their 1977 review, Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) reported the presence of 2-azetidinecarboxylic acid and nicotianamine in tobacco. Hecht et al. (1580) reported the identification of azetidine in both tobacco and smoke in 1977. Brunnemann and Hoffmann (486) reported the presence of the nitrosamine, 1-nitroso-2-azetidinecarboxylic acid in tobacco in 1991. Table XVII.A-1 lists the four-membered N-containing ring compounds identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. Only five compounds are known to exist in tobacco and tobacco smoke that contain an azetidine ring. All five have been identified in tobacco. Azetidine has been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
XVII.A.3 Five-Membered N-Containing Rings Tobacco and smoke chemists have shown an intense interest in the chemistry and biochemistry of this diverse class of compounds. Numerous studies on the presence of nitrogenous compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke have appeared 727
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 727
11/24/08 12:27:27 PM
728
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
NH
5
Azetidine
5
2
4 3 2-Pyrroline
H N
H N
R
R
N
N R
3-Pyrrolines
R Pyrroles
R
N
Pyrazoles
2
H N
4 3 Pyrrolidine
R N
H N
R
5
2
3 NH
4 Imidazolidine
5 4
2 N
3 2-Imidazoline
N N Imidazoles
N R
H N N
1,2,4-Triazole
Figure XVII.A-1 Representative structures of the 4- and 5-membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke.
over the past forty-five years and various aspects of the origin of these compounds in tobacco and their presence in tobacco smoke by direct transfer, pyrosynthesis, and combustion processes have been examined. Books, reviews, and articles by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), Stedman (3797), Neurath (2724), Tso (3972, 3973), Chaplin (677a), Leffingwell (2337), Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), Hecht et al. (1580), Leete (2330c), Bush and Saunders (557a), Green (1351), Newell et al. (2769), Ishiguru and Sugawara (1884), Heckman and Best (1587), Gorrod and Wahren (1334d), Davis and Nielsen (910a), and Gorrod and Jacob (1334c) contain synopses of much of the information we know today on N-containing ring compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. During the 1970s and 1980s, an exceptional amount of research on tobacco and smoke component isolation and identification was conducted and published. This was
largely due to many scientific advancements that occurred in chromatographic methods during this period. The results of several excellent studies on tobacco leaf composition by Lloyd et al. (2389), Dickerson et al. (965), Roberts and Rohde (3219), Takahara et al. (3858), Demole et al. (937–939, 941, 943, 943a), Fujimori et al. (1247, 1249, 1250), Chuman et al. (731–739), Schumacher (3550), and Schumacher and Vestal (3561) are included here for reference. The Swedish Tobacco Company published nearly one hundred articles on the composition of tobacco, primarily Oriental tobacco. The many Swedish Tobacco Company investigators included Aasen, Almqvist, Behr, Enzell, Hlubucek, Kimland, Nishida, and Wahlberg, all of whom co-authored many tobacco composition articles (1–13, 52, 53, 84, 91–94, 227, 229–236, 1149–1157a, 1205a, 1660–1662, 2092–2095, 3315, 4083– 4102). Excellent detailed summaries of their identification
Table XVII.A-1 4-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 728
11/24/08 12:27:28 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
of hundreds of tobacco components and the generation of them from various terpenoid structures were presented and published in the late 1970s and early 1980s by Enzell (1149, 1150), Enzell and Wahlberg (1156), and Wahlberg and Enzell (4089, 4090). The basic five-membered N-containing ring compounds found in tobacco; whether they contain one or more nitrogens, arise from several metabolic and catabolic pathways. Additionally, many N-containing ring compounds are formed via nonenzymatic browning reactions. Amino acids and proteins are produced in living species and are essential compounds of tobacco plants. One of the most important metabolic pathways in plants is the Krebs tricarboxylic acid cycle (2337, 3973). The Krebs cycle controls the metabolic carbon-nitrogen balance in living plants by converting carbon dioxide via photosynthesis to such intermediates as oxaloacetic, a-ketoglutaric, and pyruvic acids. Concurrently, inorganic nitrogen as nitrates is assimilated through the plant roots and is subsequently reduced to ammonia by hydrogen originating from reactions occurring in the Krebs cycle. Ammonia then reacts with oxaloacetic, a-ketoglutaric, and pyruvic acids to form aspartic and glutamic acids and alanine, which provide the nitrogen for further synthesis of other amino acids (1351). These amino acids are then used as the nitrogen pool from which many of the other nitrogenous compounds of the tobacco plant are formed. For example, the pyrrolidine ring can be formed from arginine or ornithine via a series of metabolic reactions involving arginine decarboxylase or ornithine decarboxylase to form putrescine (1,4-diaminobutane) which is then converted to 4-methylaminobutanal via putrescine N-methyltransferase, S-adenosine-methionine, and methylputrescine oxidase. Via cyclization and demethylation, pyrrolidine is produced (3973). Numerous other metabolic reactions occur that produce five-membered N-containing ring compounds such as the pyrrolines, pyrroles, pyrazolines, pyrazoles, imidazolidines, imidazolines, and imidazoles. From the time of harvest through curing and aging, many changes take place in the concentrations of tobacco leaf amino acids and proteins (3972). According to Gaines and Miles (1270a), one of the extremely important aims of this process is to accomplish a degradation of tobacco proteins. This degradation produces numerous types of short-chained amino acid oligomers, free amino acids, and many functionalized N-containing compounds, such as alcohols, aldehydes, acids, aldehydes and esters. Among these catabolic breakdown products are the simple four-, five-, and six-membered N-containing ring compounds and a variety of alkaloids and alkaloid-type compounds that are oxidized, reduced, or otherwise functionalized. The origins of the five-membered N-containing ring compounds in leaf are also attributed at least partially to nonenzymatic browning or Maillard reactions between sugars and amino acids (965). Many compounds formed by nonenzymatic browning reactions have desirable flavor and aroma characteristics that taken together form the characteristic bouquet and taste associated with tobacco (2337).
729
A wide variety of five-membered N-containing ring compounds have been isolated and identified in tobacco smoke. Two general mechanisms are involved: direct transfer of tobacco components to tobacco smoke and the generation of smoke components by combustion and pyrolysis of tobacco. In 1977 it was estimated that the direct transfer of components from leaf to smoke accounted for about one-third of the smoke constituents identified in tobacco smoke at that time (1351). This process is relatively simple and many of its factors are understood. This process has been discussed in some length by Wakeham (4103). The second mechanism involves the pyrolysis, combustion, and subsequent pyrogenesis of smoke components. This process is complex and involves the tobacco, the means and materials used in constructing the smoking article, and the actual smoking process (puff volume, duration, puff interval, etc.). The relationships between various leaf constituents and their pyrolysis products are the ones most difficult to trace yet they are the most necessary to understand (1351). In contrast to the number of leaf components that generally transfer directly to smoke (~33%), only about 16% of the 313 tobacco and tobacco smoke compounds that contain a fivemembered N-containing ring were found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. A considerable portion of the smoke yields from these compounds was no doubt due to transfer of the compounds directly from tobacco, although some of the yield of these compounds is produced by pyrolysis, combustion, and pyrogenesis of a variety of compounds in tobacco. As mentioned previously the largest contributors of organic leaf nitrogen are the leaf proteins, alkaloids, and amino acids. A majority of the protein in the tobacco consists of the enzymes associated with photosynthesis. The single most abundant protein in tobacco is called Fraction I and is designated functionally as ribulose-l,5-diphosphate carboxylase. Our knowledge of the genomic makeup of tobacco has advanced tremendously in the last twenty years. Once the Tobacco Genome Initiative is completed, over 90% of the genetic map of tobacco will be known (429b, 429c). Numerous databases of genes, enzymes, and reactions occurring in Nicotiana species are already available. The identities of the free amino acids of cured leaf are well known (1351). Of the forty-four amino acids reported in leaf, a majority have also been found in tobacco smoke. Proline and asparagine are the major amino acids in fluecured tobacco, whereas asparagine and aspartic acid are the major amino acids in burley tobacco. These plus glutamine and histidine are the principal amino acid precursors of the five-membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco. High-temperature pyrolysis studies of protein and amino acids have been described in a series of papers by Smith et al. (3724, 3727a, 3728a, 3729), Patterson et al. (2902–2905), Higman et al. (1647), Schmeltz (3477–3479), Sugimura et al. (3829), and Yamamoto et al. (4365a). Under these pyrolytic conditions, pyrodegradation and pyrosynthesis were extensive. In general, pyrolysis gave complex mixtures that were qualitatively similar regardless of the specific amino acid being pyrolyzed. Compounds identified included aromatic hydrocarbons
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 729
11/24/08 12:27:28 PM
730
such as benzene and naphthalene, their N-containing analogs such as pyridine and quinoline, pyrrole, aromatic nitriles such as benzonitrile and 1-naphthonitrile, aniline, and phenols. As suggested by Patterson et al. (2904), this similarity of results indicates that the amino acids and proteins undergo degradation into common intermediates of two-, three-, and four-carbon types which subsequently recombine to form more thermally stable aromatic systems. To be discussed in a subsequent chapter is the pyrogenesis of the potent mutagens 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) and 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) from tryptophan (3829) and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) and 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole (Glu-P-1) from glutamic acid (3828a, 4365a), all four of which were subsequently identified in tobacco smoke (3828c). Table XVII.A-2 catalogs many of the pyrolysis studies conducted on amino acids. Pyrolysis and smoke studies of amino acids indicate that they are potential precursors of several nitrogen heterocyclic ring systems found in tobacco smoke. Proline has been shown to be efficiently converted to pyrrole upon pyrolysis (3219, 3724) and in addition has been proposed as a possible precursor of pyrocoll (2593, 4336). g-Amino acids and dicarboxylic amino acids are capable, under pyrolytic conditions, of forming 2-pyrrolidones (1967, 3079) and by a similar mechanism, D-amino acids can form 2-piperidones (1967, 3079). A side effect of the pyrolysis of amino acids is the formation of hydrogen cyanide. Johnson and Kang (1967) studied the hydrogen cyanide yields from pyrolysis of compounds containing ring nitrogen and found that these heterocycles, particularly those with fivemembered rings, produced the highest yields of hydrogen cyanide. These results are in accord with those of Smith et al. (3724) in which proline was found to give high yields of hydrogen cyanide. The pathway seems to be through pyrrole which is formed in excellent yield (67%) on pyrolysis of proline. Patterson et al. (2908) had previously found that pyrrole on pyrolysis at 850°C is converted in 49% yield to hydrogen cyanide. This may not be the only pathway for the formation of hydrogen cyanide from proline because Johnson and Kang (1967) found that proline can generate hydrogen cyanide more readily than pyrrole. Protein and free amino acids found in tobacco leaf contribute significantly through pyrodegradation and pyrosynthesis to the formation of many nitrogenous compounds found in tobacco smoke. The nonvolatility of these compounds either as free acids, proteins, or members of tobacco pigment, for example, porphyrins, make them particularly liable to pyrolytic destruction because they, unlike nicotine and the other plant alkaloids, are not readily volatilized and swept away as the more intense heat of the cigarette coal approaches (3724). There are also interactions that occur among amino acids, proteins, and carbohydrates during plant growth and during smoke formation. These interactions form complex mixtures of leaf constituents and complex mixtures resulting from the pyrodegradation and pyrosynthesis of reaction products of amino acids, proteins, and carbohydrates.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-2 Studies on the Pyrolysis of Amino Acids Amino Acid
CAS. No.
Amino acids
Alanine Arginine Asparagine Cysteine Cystine Glutamic acid
107-95-9 74-79-3 7006-34-0 52-90-4 24645-67-8 6899-05-4
Glutamine Histidine
56-85-9 71-00-1
Histidine, 3-methylLysine
56-87-1
Methionine Ornithine Ornithine, N5(aminocarbonyl){citrulline} Phenylalanine
63-68-3 70-26-8 372-75-8
Serine
6898-95-9
Threonine Tryptophan
72-19-5 73-22-3
Tyrosine Valine
60-18-4 7004-03-7
63-91-2
References Kato et al. (2048, 2049), Kosuge et al. (2178a), Masuda et al. (2486), Nebert et al. (2688a) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b), Ohgaki et al. (2849b), Sugimura (3828a), Takeda et al. (3863a), Takayama et al. (3862b), Yamamoto et al. (4365a) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b), Smith et al. (3722a) Smith et al. (3722a) Matsumoto et al. (2491b), Wakabayashi et al. (4102a) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b)
Matsumoto et al. (2491b), Sugimura et al. (3829) Kato et al. (2048), Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Hosaka et al. (1835a), Matsukura et al. (2491a), Matsumoto et al. (2491b), Negishi and Hayatsu (2689a), Sugimura et al. (3829), Takayama et al. (3862d), Yamazoe et al. (4370a), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4390) Matsumoto et al. (2491b) Matsumoto et al. (2491b)
In freshly harvested leaf, both reducing sugars and amino acids are present, and these are known to react to form nonvolatile sugar-amino acid compounds, known as Amadori compounds (1671b). A number of these Amadori compounds have been isolated from flue-cured tobacco leaf by Cousins (841a), Tomita et al. (3923), Yamamoto et al. (4362), and Wahl (4081a). Noguchi et al. (2794a) have shown how the free amino acid concentration of leaf decreases during aging and the Amadori compound levels initially increase and then slowly decrease. These changes, especially the decrease in Amadori compounds, indicate the possible progress of Maillard-type reactions during natural aging of leaf tobaccos.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 730
11/24/08 12:27:28 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Dickerson et al. (965) found evidence for progress of the Maillard reaction in their studies on aged flue-cured leaf where a number of formylpyrroles were isolated. Dickerson et al. (965) followed the formation of several formylpyrroles from a specific Amadori compound. The Amadori compound was converted via the Maillard reaction to a 3-deoxyosulose which further reacted with either an amino acid or an amine to form the isolated formylpyrroles. In addition to the formylpyrroles, a number of pyrazines and furans, characteristic of nonenzymatic browning reactions, were also isolated from flue-cured tobacco. Thus, there is evidence for the Maillard reaction occurring even before smoking. Sometimes in sugar-amine browning systems where pyrazines are isolated, there is also found another class of nitrogen heterocyclic compounds, the imidazoles (1835b, 1947a). These compounds have been reported in tobacco smoke by Schumacher and co-workers (3553). In contrast to the pyrazines, only a few imidazoles have been isolated from nonenzymatic browning reactions of foods. This might be due to the unusually high boiling points and polarity of these compounds. Grimmett (1410b) has reviewed the formation of imidazoles from the interaction of carbohydrates and amine sources, and many of the same compounds found to be pyrazines precursors can also form imidazoles. Simple sugars, starches, and cellulose — all known tobacco leaf constituents — are reported to react with amines, including ammonia, to form imidazoles (1351). Many of the reactions producing imidazoles in tobacco and tobacco smoke involve the interaction of carbohydrates with ammonia, which has several precursors in tobacco. Amino acids and proteins can contribute to the formation of smoke amines and the formation of ammonia. Johnson et al. (1964) conclusively demonstrated through experiments with 15N-glycine that it is an ammonia source. In addition to amino acids, nitrates have been shown to be efficiently converted during the smoking of a cigarette to ammonia (1964). This ammonia from nitrates was shown to participate in the formation of many nitrogenous compounds in smoke. Thus, leaf nitrates as well as amino acids and proteins are considered the major sources of ammonia in tobacco smoke. As to the mode by which certain leaf constituents may form imidazoles, it is commonly recognized that a-dicarbonyl compounds may react with aldehydes in the presence of ammonia to form nitrogen heterocyclic compounds such as imidazoles. The required a-dicarbonyl compounds and aldehydes are well-known pyrolysis products of carbohydrates either through thermal (1170a) or Maillard-type (1671a) degradations, and many of these compounds have been isolated from tobacco smoke (3797). It is possible that a-aminoketones, such as those proposed as intermediates in the formation of pyrazines, may also be involved with the formation of imidazoles because reactions producing imidazoles from these compounds have been reported (1410b). Although the formation of imidazoles through carbohydrate and amino acid or protein interaction is especially appealing due to the analogies which can be made with pyrazines, a second origin is also possible. Tobacco leaf contains an appreciable amount
731
of the amino acid histidine, either in its free form or as part of tobacco protein. Pyrodegradation of this compound in a manner similar to that of tryptophan (2047) could also be a source of some imidazoles in tobacco smoke. The contribution of the five-membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke to smoke flavor is not as well known. The flavor evaluations of some tobacco-derived imidazoles have been described by Schumacher et al. (3553a). The flavors of these compounds are an example of how relatively nonvolatile, flavorless compounds in tobacco leaf can be transformed during the smoking process into a part of the characteristic aroma of tobacco smoke. Leffingwell et al. (2341) and Roberts (3215) in their review of natural tobacco flavor reported that several acetylpyrroles provided a nutty, woody, and sweet taste to tobacco smoke but that formylpyrroles often added harshness to the tobacco smoke aroma. Imidazoles have been reported to provide a sweet chocolate or nutty character to tobacco smoke at low levels but can be bitter at high levels (3215). The principal precursor for the biosynthesis of ring structures of pyrrolidine, pyrroline, and pyrrole is glutamine (2056b, 2659a, 2848a). Pyrrole structures can also be produced in plants from arginine or ornithine (2056b). The biosynthetic pathway for the production of the imidazole ring structure involves the biosynthesis of histidine through a series of ten enzymatic reactions (57a). The first intermediate of the pathway (phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate) is also the starting point for purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis. The amino acid glutamine provides much of the backbone for imidazole, which is an intermediate in histidine biosynthesis (429d). From imidazole glycerol phosphate five additional enzymatic steps are needed for the plant to produce histidine. The imidazoline and imidazolidines rings can be produced by enzymatic hydrogenation of the imidazole ring. The imidazolidine ring is also believed to be produced biosynthetically when glutamate condenses with carbamyl phosphate to form hydantoin or imidazolidine-2,4-dione. The hydantoin can be enzymatically reduced to imidazolidines (225a). Additionally, hydantoin can be produced in plants by hydrogenation of allantoin (2,5-dioxo-4-imidazolidinylurea), a cyclic amide naturally occurring in many plants (4068a). Pyrazolidine, pyrazoline, and pyrazoles are produced in plants from 1,3-diaminopropane via pyrazoles synthase (C3) (437a). The five-membered N-containing ring compounds with three nitrogens are the 1,2,3-triazoles and the 1,2,4-triazoles. Triazoles are not produced in plants naturally but are found as structural components of many pesticides and herbicides. Seven herbicides containing a five-membered N-containing ring have been identified in tobacco as residues. The pesticides containing a 1,2,4-triazole ring include three fungicides (Triadimefon®, Penconazole®, and Triadimenol®), one herbicide (Sulfentrazone®), and one insecticide (Triazophos®). Two 1,2,3-triazoles (as benzotriazoles) have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke to date, Azinphos-MethylOxon® and Azinphos-Methyl®. Both of these pesticides are insecticides. Azinphos-Methyl-Oxon® has also been
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 731
11/24/08 12:27:28 PM
732
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-3 Distribution of 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Number of Identified 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component
Total
Smoke
Tobacco
Smoke and Tobacco
Pyrroles Pyrrolidines Pyrrolines Pyrazoles Imidazoles Imidazolidines Imidazolines Triazoles
116 79 28 16 62 10 3 7
88 64 23 13 57 8 1 2
50 36 7 3 8 3 2 8
22 21 2 0 3 1 0 3
Totals
321
256
117
52
identified as a degradation product of Azinphos-Methyl®. All of these triazoles were reported as tobacco pesticide residues (928a, 2913a, 3663, 2650a). The remaining fungicide in this series of five-membered N-containing ring compounds with three nitrogens is Iprodione®. Iprodione® is an imidazolidinecarboxamide and has been reported as a fungicide residue on tobacco (3585, 3633, 3661a). Table XVII.A-3 lists the distribution of five-membered N-containing ring compounds identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. Table XVII.A-4 lists 321 compounds, of which 116 are pyrroles, seventy-nine are pyrrolidines, and twenty-eight are pyrrolines. There are sixteen pyrazoles listed in Table XVII.A-4. Sixty-two imidazoles, ten imidazolidines, and three imidazolines have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Five compounds with a 1,2,4-triazole ring have been identified in tobacco. Two compounds with a 1,2,3-triazole ring (as benzotriazoles) have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The compounds in Table XVII.A-4 exhibit a great deal of functionality. Although each contains a five-membered N-containing ring, some are alcohols, ketones, sugaramines, acids, esters, and imides. Of the 321 compounds listed in Table XVII.A-4, 256 are found in tobacco smoke, 117 are found in tobacco, and 52 are present in both tobacco and tobacco smoke.
XVII.A.4 Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke With Multiple Five-Membered N-Containing Rings Porphyrins are a class of biologically important heterocyclic compounds with a characteristic chemical structure that includes four pyrrole groups (five-membered organic rings each containing a nitrogen atom) linked on opposite sides
(a position) through four methine bridges (=CH-) to form a large flat ring structure (see Figure XVII.A-2). A porphyrin in which no metal is inserted in its cavity is called a free base. Many organic analogs that contain a porphryin ring are biological pigments and are closely related molecules responsible for many of the vivid colors in living organisms. They often occur combined with metal ions and various substituents as coordination complexes. Chlorophylls are magnesium complexes of porphyrin derivatives (also called phorbines). In plants, these pigments are responsible for photosynthesis and play important roles as respiratory pigments, electron transport carriers, and oxidative enzymes. Several chlorophylls have been identified in tobacco, the most common being chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. Chlorophyll a is a waxy blue-black microcrystalline green-plant pigment, C55H72MgN4O5, with a characteristic blue-green alcohol solution. Chlorophyll b is a similar green-plant pigment, C55H70MgN4O6, having a brilliant green alcohol solution. Several other chlorophyll derivatives have also been isolated from tobacco (3770a). The biosynthesis of porphyrin involves glycine and succinyl-CoA (from the citric acid cycle) to form d-aminolevulinic acid (dALA). Two dALA molecules are combined into porphobilinogen (PBG), which contains the pyrrole ring. Four PBGs are then combined through deamination into hydroxymethylbilane (HMB), which is hydrolyzed to form the circular tetrapyrrole, uroporphyrinogen III. This molecule undergoes a number of further modifications. The biosynthesis is complicated and requires anywhere from seven to thirty enzymatic reactions involving a variety of catalytic activities, including decarboxylation, methylation, metal ion chelation, and porphyrin ring oxidation. Intermediates are used in different species to form particular substances, but, in plants and tobacco in particular, the main end-product is protoporphyrin IX, which is combined with magnesium to form chlorophyll (3770a). Table XVII.A-5 lists the compounds in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke with multiple fivemembered N-containing rings. While fourteen porphyrincontaining compounds have been identified in tobacco, only porphyrin itself has been identified in tobacco smoke (1899, 3491).
NH
N
N
HN
Figure XVII.A-2 Porphyrin.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 732
11/24/08 12:27:29 PM
733
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.A-4 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 733
11/24/08 12:27:31 PM
734
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 734
11/24/08 12:27:32 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
735
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 735
11/24/08 12:27:33 PM
736
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 736
11/24/08 12:27:34 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
737
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 737
11/24/08 12:27:35 PM
738
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 738
11/24/08 12:27:36 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
739
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 739
11/24/08 12:27:37 PM
740
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 740
11/24/08 12:27:38 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
741
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 741
11/24/08 12:27:39 PM
742
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 742
11/24/08 12:27:42 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
743
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 743
11/24/08 12:27:42 PM
744
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 744
11/24/08 12:27:43 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
745
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 745
11/24/08 12:27:44 PM
746
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.A-4 (Continued) 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Table XVII.A-5 Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Multiple 5-Membered N-Containing Rings
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 746
11/24/08 12:27:46 PM
747
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.A-5 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Multiple 5-Membered N-Containing Rings
XVII.B Monocyclic Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds XVII.B.1 Introduction Over the years several detailed composition studies on the volatile components in flue-cured [Lloyd et al. (2389) and Dickerson et al. (965)], burley [Roberts and Rohde (3219), Demole et al. (937, 938, 940–942), and Fujimori et al. (1249– 1252, 1256)], Maryland [Schumacher (3550)], and Oriental tobaccos [Kimland et al. (2092–2095), Almqvist et al. (52), Aasen et al. (5, 11b), Hlubucek et al. (1660, 1660a, 1661, 1662), Schumacher (3561), Fukuzumi et al. (1257, 1258), and Chuman et al. (731–739)] have been published (2337, 3797). Similarly,
the composition of tobacco smoke (3797) has advanced tremendously over the years (1373), notably by the works of Schumacher et al. (3553), Heckman and Best (1587), Grob (1412–1427), Bartle et al. (199, 200), Neurath (2719–2753), Elmenhorst (1129–1140), Newell et al. (2769), Hoffmann and colleagues (480, 486, 735, 1580), the tobacco research personnel at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Atlanta, Georgia, and many others [see additional listing in (2337)]. Tobacco chemists have shown considerable interest in the chemistry and biochemistry of the diverse set of N-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Numerous studies on the presence of nitrogenous compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke have been published. These studies have reported on various aspects of the origins of nitrogenous
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 747
11/24/08 12:27:46 PM
748
compounds in tobacco, their synthesis, pyrolysis, and transfer to smoke. Several books and reviews [Tso (3972–3974b), Neurath (2724), Stedman (3797), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), Leffingwell (2337), Hecht et al. (1580)] have been written on N-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The levels of chemical compounds in tobacco are affected by genetics, environmental conditions, and agronomic practices. Considering the six-membered N-containing ring compounds and especially the alkaloid-type components (five- and six-membered and multiple six-membered nitrogen heterocycles) of tobacco, this is especially true. There have been numerous reviews on factors affecting plant growth and nicotine/alkaloid accumulation in tobacco [Bush and Saunders (557a), Chaplin and Miner (677a), Bush and Crowe (17B04), Leete (2331a, 2331–2334), Bush (555a), Strunz and Findley (17B56), Bush et al. (17B05)]. Section XVII.B provides information on compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke that contain a six-membered N-containing ring (piperidines, tetrahydropyridines, pyridines, piperazines, dihydropyrazines, pyrazines, pyrimidines, pyridazines, and triazines), compounds with a five-membered (pyrrolidine, pyrrole, imidazole) plus a six-membered N-containing ring (pyridine), and compounds containing two or more six-membered N-containing rings (piperidines, pyridines). The formation of these compounds in tobacco from biosynthetic pathways and from nonenzymatic processes will be presented, as well as means of their generation and delivery to tobacco smoke.
XVII.B.2 Biosynthesis of Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds and the Five- and Six-Membered and Multiple Six-Membered Nitrogen Heterocycles of Tobacco The next few paragraphs will discuss the biosynthesis of the sixmembered N-containing ring compounds and especially the alkaloid-type components (five- and six-membered and multiple six-membered nitrogen heterocycles) of tobacco. Following the biosynthesis section, information will be provided on the formation of some of the six-membered N-containing ring compounds that occur during tobacco aging and processing. Finally, a discussion of how these six-membered N-containing ring compounds and especially the alkaloid-type components arise in tobacco smoke will be presented. Over sixty species of Nicotiana exist that produce nicotine alkaloids (nicotine, nornicotine, anatabine, anabasine). Nicotine is the predominant alkaloid in over 50% of the Nicotiana species. Nornicotine is the major alkaloid in about 30% to 40% of Nicotiana species. Anabasine and anatabine are not usually the principal alkaloids in Nicotiana (17B05). Tobaccos that accumulate and have high levels of alkaloids tend to also have accumulations of minor alkaloids, for example, cotinine, myosmine, nicotyrine, 2,3′-bipyridine, and numerous derivatives of the major alkaloids, for example, alkyl, acyl, and nitroso derivatives of nicotine and the other
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
major alkaloids. The starting materials for the biosynthesis of the alkaloids are all present in tobacco. The precursors for pyridine, pyrrolidine, piperidine, and the most abundant nicotine alkaloids (nicotine, anabasine, anatabine, cotinine, myosmine) are well known and have been reviewed by Bush et al. (17B05). Although great advances in our understanding of alkaloid biosynthetic processes have occurred over the last fifty years, the metabolic and degradative processes occurring in Nicotiana species are still being researched. The biosynthesis of some of the six-membered N-containing ring compounds (pyrazines, pyridazines, and triazoles) is still not completely understood. As mentioned above, the biosynthesis of pyridine, pyrrolidine, and piperidine will be presented. The subsequent biosynthesis of the major alkaloids will then follow. It should be noted that although biosynthesis is the most important means of producing the six-membered N-containing ring compounds and the alkaloids found in tobacco, other processes for their production in leaf are also operative. Several tobacco processing operations such as aging, fermentation, thermal treatments of tobacco prior to use in products, tobacco expansion, blending operations, and additive applications can vary (both increase or decrease) the concentration of various six-membered N-containing ring compounds and alkaloids. Pyridine and the pyridine ring of nicotine, nornicotine, anabasine, and anatabine are formed from nicotinic acid. Yang et al. (17B62) reported that quinolinic acid was the precursor to nicotinic acid via quinolinic acid phosphoribosyl-transferase. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (from glycerol) and aspartic acid via a series of enzymes are converted to quinolinic acid. Jackanioz and Byerrum (17B17) showed that 14C-labeled aspartate and malate incorporated into the C-2 and C-3 positions of the pyridine ring when these amino acids were fed to tobacco plants. The total biosynthetic pathway and intermediates involved have not yet been completely elucidated. The most accepted biosynthetic pathways for piperidine is lysine via D‘-piperidine (3973, 17B05). Piperidine can also be formed through decarboxylation and dehydrogenation of nicotinic acid (17B37). The pyrrolidine ring and particularly the N-methylpyrrolidine ring of nicotine is biosynthesized through putrescine (1,4butanediamine), N-methylputrescine, and 4-methylaminobutanal to the N-methyl-D‘-pyrrolinium salt (17B41). Dewey et al. (17B11) and Leete (17B29) fed 14C-ornithine to tobacco and found incorporation of activity in the C-2′ and C-5′ carbons of the N-methylpyrrolidine ring. Arginine via arginine decarboxylase forms agmatine that is converted to putrescine as a second source of this intermediate for the production of the pyrrolidine ring. Again, some of the intermediates and enzymes involved in the biosynthetic production of pyrrolidine are still not completely known (2334, 17B02, 17B63, 17B64). Dawson et al. (17B07, 17B08) showed that nicotinic acid formed the pyridine ring in nicotine. Yang et al. (17B62) showed that the pyrrolidine ring of nicotine was attached at the C-3 position of the pyridine ring of nicotine. Dawson et al. (17B07) in another publication showed that the hydrogen at
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 748
11/24/08 12:27:47 PM
749
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
the C-6 position of nicotinic acid was lost during nicotine formation. Dawson and Osdene (17B09) and Leete (2330c) showed that nicotine formation proceeds through the reduction of nicotinic acid to 3,6-dihydronicotinic acid. Friesen and Leete (1241a) proposed that dihydronicotinic acid forms a zwitterion by proton transfer that readily decarboxylates to yield 1,2-dihydropyridine. 1,2-Dihydropyridine in turn reacts with N-methyl-D‘-pyrrolinium salt to yield 3,6-dihydronicotine. The 3,6-dihydronicotine is oxidized with the loss of the hydrogen originally present at the C-6 position of nicotinic acid and retention of the hydrogen added in the reduction step to 3,6-dihydronicotinic acid. This pathway adequately explains the majority of the intermediates formed during nicotine biosynthesis and the fact that all nicotine in tobacco plants is (-)-2‘S-nicotine (Figure XVII.B-1). Although nicotine is formed and is present in large quantities in tobacco, it is important to understand that the vast majority of all nicotine in tobacco is present in the form of organic salts. Very little nicotine exists in the free base form due to the acidic nature of tobacco. The exact identities of the nicotine salts that exist in tobacco are not known but there have been several reports by Perfetti (2918a, 2924, 2926, 3156), Seeman et al. (17B48), and Dixon et al. (989) who have speculated on the various salt forms of nicotine.
H
COOH
H
H
2H
N
Both of the six-membered N-containing rings of anatabine (pyridine and piperidine) can be formed from the two methylene carbons and nitrogen of aspartate and two carbons from a glycerol derivative via nicotinic acid (2330c, 17B32, 17B33, 17B37). Nicotinic acid is reduced to 3,6-dihydronicotinic acid and decarboxylated to 1,2-dihydropyridine and 2,5-dihydropyridine. 1,2-Dihydropyridine reacts with 2,5-dihydropyridine via an electrophilic attack to form 3,6-dihydroanatabine which aromatizes to (-)-2‘S-anatabine (17B36). Although one might expect that anatabine and anabasine could be interconverted enzymatically in the plant, as these compounds differ by only two hydrogens, this does not appear to be true. The pyridine ring of anabasine has been shown to originate from nicotinic acid via decarboxylation (17B54). The precursor for the piperidine ring is lysine via D‘-piperidine with the nitrogen derived from the e-nitrogen of lysine (17B35). This was shown to occur via 14C-lysine feeding studies by Leete (17B30, 17B34). 14C was incorporated into the C-2‘ position of the piperidine ring of anabasine. Nornicotine is formed from nicotine during the growth period of the tobacco plant and during senescence (17B06). Enzymatic demethylation of nicotine yields nearly equal quantities of the (+) and (-) isomers of nornicotine (17B05).
COOH
-CO2
N
N H
H 3,6-Dihydronicotinic acid
Nicotinic acid
H
1,2-Dihydropyridine N-methylpyrrolium ion H
N H
N
CH3
-2H
N
H
H
(-)-2'S-Nicotine -CH3
-CH3
H 3,6-Dihydronicotine
N H
N (-)-Nornicotine
N
H -2H
-2H
H H N (+)-Nornicotine COOH
N N Myosmine
CH3
N
N Nicotinic acid
Figure XVII.B-1 Proposed biosynthetic pathways for production of several pyridine alkaloids (17B05).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 749
11/24/08 12:27:47 PM
750
Myosmine can be formed from nornicotine by enzymatic dehydrogenation (2332, 17B24). Cotinine and 2,3‘-bipyridyl and their derivatives represent the major oxidized alkaloids in tobacco. Cotinine is synthesized from nicotine via enzymatic oxidation or autooxidation (1157, 17B03). 2,3‘-Bipyridyl is formed by oxidation of anatabine. Frankenburg et al. (1221a, 1222-1224) were the first to identify 2,3‘-bipyridyl as a fermentation product along with 3-acylpyridine. Other oxidized alkaloids identified in green and cured tobacco are nicotyrine, nicotinic acid, nicotinamide, and nicotine-N-oxides. Enzell et al. (1149a) found that these oxidation products of tobacco alkaloids tend to increase in yield during curing and storage of tobacco. Pyrimidines play a central role in cellular regulation and metabolism. They are substrates for DNA and RNA biosynthesis, regulators of biosynthesis of some amino acids, and cofactors in the biosynthesis of phospholipids, glycolipids, sugars, and polysaccharides (17B45). Pyrimidine biosynthesis is very complicated and involves formic acid, glutamate, and aspartate as starting materials in a series of enzymatic reactions to eventually form orotic acid. Orotic acid, or uracil6-carboxylic acid, is an intermediate in the metabolism of pyrimidine nucleotides. The naturally occurring derivatives of pyrimidine are components of the nucleic acids cytosine, thymidine, and uracil. Free pyrimidine and functionalized pyrimidine compounds in tobacco are believed to be formed from the catabolism of various nucleosides (17B21). Although pyrazines, for example, pyrazine-2-carboxylate and pyrazine 2,3-dicarboxylate, are formed biosynthetically, the vast majority of the varied pyrazine derivatives in tobacco are formed during curing via nonenzymatic reactions. Pyrazines can arise in tobaccos by a number of chemical pathways ranging from the heating or aging of proteins and amino acids to the interaction of amino acids and/or ammonia with sugars or carbonyl constituents. No single pathway is involved in the formation of pyrazine. The formation of pyrazine compounds is complex and depends on a variety of factors and chemical mechanisms (2339b). Adachi et al. (17B01) postulated that tetramethylpyrazine is derived enzymatically from two moles of acetoin (acetylmethylcarbinol) and two moles of ammonia. This finding was supported by the findings of Demain et al. (17B10) that a block in the isoleucinevaline pathway leads to the accumulation and excretion of a large amount of tetramethylpyrazine. Shu (17B51) treated acetoin with amino acids to determine whether ammonia is released, leading to the formation of tetramethylpyrazine. His results showed that all reactions between amino acids and acetoin generate not only alkylated pyrazines, for example, tetramethylpyrazine, but also the corresponding Strecker aldehydes. Pyridazines and triazines are not usually biosynthesized in plants. The exception is azathymine (6-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)-dione) which has been identified in modified bases from DNA of tobacco mosaic virus (3973). The majority of the identified pyridazines and triazines in tobacco are believed to originate from residues of agronomic chemicals. The pyridazine structure is found in herbicides containing
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
maleic hydrazide. The triazine structure is found in the tobacco herbicide Metribuzin® and the fungicide Anilizine®. A variety of alkyl-, acyl-, and hydroxyacyl-substituted alkaloids exists in tobacco. These have been identified and studied by a number of research groups [Bolt (389), Warfield et al. (4133), Matsushima et al. (17B39), Severson et al. (17B49), Zador and Jones (17B65)]. The mechanisms proposed for the biosynthesis of these alkaloids are oxidation or formylation. For example, N‘-formylnornicotine [2-(3pyridinyl)-1-pyrrolidinecarboxaldehyde] can be formed by formylation of nornicotine or by oxidation of the N-methyl group of nicotine (2330c, 17B03). Additionally, Burton et al. (17B03) have proposed that many acylated alkaloids are formed via acylation of secondary amine alkaloids (994). The concentrations of these alkylated and acylated alkaloids are small in comparison to the total alkaloid concentration in tobacco. Their occurrence is mainly influenced by plant genetics and agricultural practices (17B05). It is believed that their accumulation in leaf may be significant to flavor perception (17B05). A number of tobacco N-nitrosamines are listed in this chapter. Chapter 15 is devoted to N-nitrosamines, but a few comments must be included here. Interest in tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs) has been a result of reports that some of them have induced malignant tumors in mice, rats, and hamsters [Boyland et al. (421a, 422, 423), Hecht et al. (1557–1559, 1563–1571a, 1574–1585)]. The TSNAs of greatest interest are N‘-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), N‘-nitrosoanatabine (NAT), N‘-nitrosoanabasine (NAB), and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK). The formation of TSNAs can be biosynthetic (via mechanisms within the plant itself), produced by bacteria on the surface of the plant, and by organic reactions of flue gas during curing practices [Peele et al. (2917), see also Figure 5 in Rodgman and Green (3300)].
XVII.B.3 Other Means for the Formation of the Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds Found in Tobacco Nitrogenous compounds in tobacco account for approximately 12% to 25% of the dry weight of freshly harvested tobacco leaves (841a, 2337), (2% to 6% expressed as nitrogen). As previously mentioned, the large variation in types and yields of nitrogenous compounds in tobacco is due to the great number of Nicotiana species, the variety of different agricultural practices, and soil types worldwide for the cultivation of different tobaccos. The major organic nitrogen constituents of tobacco leaf are nicotine and related alkaloids, proteins, and amino acids (2337). The alkaloids as discussed above are biosynthesized along with a portion of most of the six-membered N-containing ring compounds found in tobacco. But there are also other ways that these compounds can be produced. The varied methods of curing and aging tobacco cause only a small decrease in the total nitrogen content, but significant changes occur as a result of organic transformations from one type of nitrogenous compound to another, for
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 750
11/24/08 12:27:47 PM
751
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
example, the enzymatic hydrolysis of leaf protein produces free amino acids (1493). After curing, dynamic changes continue to occur during aging of tobacco leaf. Weybrew et al. (4226) and Tomita et al. (3923) recognized in 1965 that chemical reactions of amino acids in tobacco play an important role in the formation of tobacco flavor. Employing model systems, reactions of amino compounds with sugars or carbonyl compounds were shown to produce flavor compounds present in tobacco (2047, 2048, 2337, 3649). During aging, tobacco undergoes a natural “sweating” process several times. This “sweating” is a mild natural fermentation that produces some heating of the tobacco. This fermentation releases reducing sugars, amino acids, phenolics, and flavonoids through nonenzymatic browning reactions to produce the flavor characteristic of aged tobacco. Much of the flavor that is produced is due to Maillard and Strecker reactions of amino acids with reducing sugars (or other carbonyls). The role of nonenzymatic browning reactions of amino acids and sugars is generally accepted as being one of the most important processes in which natural flavors are produced (2337). There are at least three other ways (other than through biosynthesis) that the six-membered N-containing ring compounds can be formed in tobacco leaf (2337). • Oxidative transformations • Ambient temperature nonenzymatic transformations • Heat-induced nonenzymatic transformations It must be remembered that compounds formed by enzymatic processes can react subsequently in a nonenzymatic transformation. Additionally, by examining the chemical transformations involved in the production of compounds via nonenzymatic browning reactions, several routes can be involved in the production of the same compounds from different precursors (2337). A type of Maillard reaction that occurs naturally in tobacco which requires the presence of active a-dicarbonyl components is the Strecker degradation of a-amino acids to aldehydes and ketones of one less carbon atom. Schonberg and Moubacher (17B46, 17B47) studied the mechanism of the Strecker degradation involving pyruvaldehyde and aalanine leading to the formation of 2,5-dimethylpyrazine and 2,5-dimethyl-3-ethylpyrazine. The fact that different amino acids can produce the same flavor compounds has been shown by a number of workers in studies on the relative formation of pyrazines under controlled reaction conditions between amino acids and glucose (2048, 2337). Similar studies have shown that thermal decompositions of various amino acids and other aminohydroxy compounds such as glucosylamine can directly form pyrazine mixtures (17B60). Because of the complexity of the chemical interactions and transformations involved, the types and ratios of active flavor products, for example, pyrazines, formed by nonenzymatic browning are dependent on the reaction conditions that may occur during aging or during the smoking process itself.
Examples of how processing tobacco affects the production of flavorful pyrazine was provided by Mays et al. (17B40) and Green et al. (1369) of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco (RJRT) Company. Ammonia/carbon dioxide expansion was conducted on flue-cured, burley, and processed tobacco sheet. Test and control cigarettes were fabricated. The tobacco aroma of the ammonia/carbon dioxide-processed tobaccos increased in all cases after processing vs. the control materials. Comparison of the per cigarette MSS yields of eight pyrazines indicated their yields in the MSS from ammonia/carbon dioxide-expanded tobacco were significantly greater than those in the control tobacco MSS [see Tables 3, 4, and 5 in (3261)]. Additionally, browning reactions can occur during the smoking process (2337). Some of the reaction products occurring during the smoking process involve six-membered N-containing ring compounds that can significantly contribute to tobacco smoke flavor and aroma, for example, some pyrazine and pyridine derivatives (2339b).
XVII.B.4 Six-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Knowledge of tobacco smoke composition grew rapidly each year by the application of new analytical methods. Prior to 1959, only sixteen nitrogen compounds had been reported in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In 1959, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) summarized the identification of about fifty nitrogen compounds. Ten years later, Neurath (2724) reported on the presence in tobacco and tobacco smoke of 181 nitrogen compounds, among which were two piperidines, twenty-four pyridines, ten pyridines, and eleven alkaloids. In this report, we have cataloged thirty-seven piperidines, 312 pyridines, seventy-eight pyrazines, and over 160 alkaloids. Table XVII.B-1 details the distribution of six-membered N-containing ring compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Table XVII.B-1 Distribution of 6-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Number of Identified 6-Membered N-Containing Ring Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component
Total
Piperidines Tetrahydropyridines Dihydropyridines Pyridines Piperazines Dihydropyridazines Pyrazines Pyrimidines 1,2,4-Triazines 1,3,5-Triazines
37 5 6 341 10 3 100 33 2 1
Totals
538
Tobacco
Smoke and Tobacco
31 2 4 295 10 1 83 14 0 0
11 4 2 116 0 3 62 20 2 1
5 1 0 70 0 1 45 1 0 0
440
221
123
Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 751
11/24/08 12:27:48 PM
752
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
H N
5
R
6
N
N
Piperidine
Tetrahydro pyridine
Dihydropyridines
N
N
N
Pyrazidine
N Pyrazine
N Pyrimidine
N
H N
3 2
Pyridine
R N
N
4
N NH*
1,2,4-Triazines
N H Piperazine
N
N
R
N 1,3,5-Triazines
Figure XVII.B-2 Structures of the 6-membered N-containing compounds found in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
Of the 538 identified compounds, about 82% (or 440 compounds) are found in tobacco smoke and about 41% (or 221 compounds) are found in tobacco. Eighteen percent (98 compounds) are found only in tobacco and 59% (317 compounds) are found only in tobacco smoke. Of the 538 compounds, 23% (123 compounds) are found in both tobacco and smoke. Figure XVII.B-2 illustrates the general structures for the ten types of six-membered N-containing ring compounds found in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The four major compound classes are the piperidines, pyridines, pyrazines, and the pyrimidines. A brief discussion of general information on each of these four classes of six-membered N-containing ring compounds follows. XVII.B.4.1 Piperidine and the Tetraand Dihydropyridines Piperidine and D3-piperidine were first identified by Neurath et al. in 1965 (2749) and 1966 (2734), respectively [see Table 3 in Neurath (2724)]. The piperidines in tobacco and tobacco smoke are found as substituted ketones, acids, and alkyl derivatives. None of the forty-eight nonaromatic sixmembered N-heterocycles found in tobacco and tobacco smoke has been shown to provide positive contributions to the flavor of tobacco smoke, although piperidine is on the GRAS list as a food flavor (3215). Pyrolysis and smoke studies of amino acids indicate that they are potential precursors of several nitrogen heterocyclic ring systems found in tobacco smoke (1351). For example, indole can be formed from tryptophan, proline has been shown to be efficiently converted to pyrrole upon pyrolysis (3219, 3726), and g-amino acids can be pyrolyzed to form 2-pyrrolidones (1967, 3079). By a similar mechanism, g-amino acids form 2-piperidones (1967, 3079). XVII.B.4.2 Pyridines A great variety of pyridines (currently 341) has been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. As a class, there are more pyridines in smoke than any other heterocycle. Vohl and Eulenberg (4064) were the first to isolate and identify pyridine in tobacco smoke in 1871. Since that time a wide variety of substituted (methyl- [picolines], dimethyl- [lutidines],
ethyl-, allyl-, butyl-, vinyl-, cyano-, formyl-, alkylamino-) pyridines have been identified. Most of the substituted groups in these pyridines occur at the three-position, although there are some substituted pyridines with functionalities at the two- and four-positions (2724). The presence of pyridine compounds in smoke is naturally associated with the tobacco alkaloids. The formation of substituted pyridines that occur during the pyrolysis of nicotine has long been known [Woodward et al. (4275a), Kaburaki et al. (2006), Jarboe and Rosene (1923a), Schmeltz et al. (3499)]. Pyridine, 3-methyl- and/or 4-methylpyridine, 3-vinylpyridine, and 3-cyanopyridine have all been identified as major pyrolysis products of nicotine. Minor pyridine pyrolysis products included 2-methylpyridine, dimethylpyridines, 3-ethylpyridine, and 2- and/or 4-cyanopyridine. All have been identified in tobacco smoke. While the formation of pyridines from nicotine might be expected to involve simple rupture of the pyridine-pyrrolidine bond, a more complex pathway is taking place. When either nicotine-N-methyl14C or nicotine-2‘-14C was pyrolyzed, several alkylated 14Clabeled pyridines were among the products. This indicated that fragments of the pyrrolidine ring can recombine and aromatize to give pyridines (1580). The pyrolytic formation of pyridines has been observed in studies on a number of nitrogenous substances. Pyrolysis of tobacco pigment and of tobacco leaf gave a spectrum of pyridines similar to those observed in smoke [Schmeltz et al. (3499), Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3463)]. Pyridines were observed in the pyrolysis of proline [Higman et al. (1647)] and pyridine was a product of pyrolysis of poly-L-proline [Johnson et al. (1968)]. Pyrolysis of nicotinamide at 1050°C gave pyridines and 3-cyanopyridine, among other products [Bruzel and Schmeltz (515)]. Pyridines were also observed in pyrolysates of pyrrole, maleic hydrazide, and N,Ndimethyldodecylamine [Patterson et al. (2907, 2908)]. In view of the above mentioned results on pyrolysis of nicotine14C and previous mechanistic studies [Hurd et al. (1851)], it is not surprising that pyridines should arise on pyrolysis of such diverse N-containing compounds. Studies on cigarettes enriched in nicotine or nornicotine indicated that nornicotine was an important precursor for pyridines [Glock and Wright (1316), Hecht et al. (1580)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 752
11/24/08 12:27:48 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Pyridines can be formed by mechanisms other than pyrolysis. The reaction of aldehydes with amino acids has been shown to generate pyridines (50). When a glycine-propanal mixture was heated to 180°C, 3,5-dimethyl-2-ethylpyridine, 3,5-dimethyl-4-ethylpyridine, and 3,5-dimethylpyridine formed. Glycine-propanal mixtures, also heated to 180°C, gave 2,5dimethylpyridine and 3,4-dimethylpyridine. This is an example of a nonpyrolytic method of forming pyridines. As smallchain aldehydes required for this reaction are abundant in smoke, this is a feasible route to pyridines. Pyridines contribute to the characteristic tobacco flavor of smoke. Fujimori (1248) identified twenty-six pyridines as components of tobacco aroma. Leffingwell et al. have tabulated the flavor and aroma characteristics of many pyridines (2341). Pyridines as a class of compounds enhance tobacco flavor, add burley flavor, or can add flue-cured flavor. Pyridines are responsible for that characteristic note in smoke that identifies the smoke as that from tobacco (1587a). Hoffmann and Wynder (1803) have made the comment that pyridines are responsible for the off-taste and irritancy of the smoke from large cigars and that pyridines reduce the inhalability of cigar smoke. Roberts commented that two particular pyridine compounds were noteworthy, 2-acetylpyridine [1-(2-pyridinyl)ethanone] and 2-methyl-5-isopropylpyridine [2-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-pyridine] (3215). The former adds some sweet, roasted, and musty notes and the latter adds body and burley character to the tobacco blend. Additionally some pyridines may react with other smoke compounds synergistically. For example, it is believed that some pyridines reduce the sweet burnt-sugar taste of cyclopentenones and furanones (3215). XVII.B.4.3 Pyrazines Pyrazines constitute a very small percentage by weight of smoke condensate (5 to 50 mg/cigarette), but pyrazines as a class of tobacco and tobacco smoke compounds are very important because of their positive flavoring properties. Pyrazine, methylpyrazine, and 2,6-dimethylpyrazine were first recognized in tobacco smoke in 1965 by Testa and Testa (3888). To date, one hundred pyrazines have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Over 50% of the identified pyrazines are found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. In the 1968 review by Stedman (3797), he listed only three pyrazines as components of tobacco smoke: pyrazine, 2-methylpyrazine, and 2,6-dimethylpyrazine. In that same year, Neurath and Dünger (2732) identified eight additional pyrazines, including 2-methyl-5-(2’-furyl)pyrazine. Leffingwell in 1976 (3237) mentioned six new pyrazines, including three acetyl-substituted pyrazines. Green (1351), in 1977, disclosed another eight novel pyrazines, including 2-methyl-5-phenylpyrazine, 3-methylpyrazinol, and pyrrolo [1,2-a]pyrazine. Heckman and Best (1587) have also identified a number of pyrazines, including five cyclopentapyrazines. There is a great diversity of pyrazines that have been identified in tobacco smoke.
753
Pyrazines have also been isolated from tobacco (938). Their presence in leaf arises from biosynthesis and from browning reaction chemistry that can occur during curing and tobacco processing. At present, sixty-two pyrazines have been identified in tobacco. Bright et al. (431) have demonstrated that the necessary precursors for the formation of pyrazines are present in tobacco leaf. In their experiments, the levels of dimethylpyrazine in untreated tobaccos were measured and then the same tobaccos were heated at 120°C for four hours and the levels measured again. In each case, the level of dimethylpyrazine was found to be very low in the untreated tobacco and appreciably increased following the roasting. Their results also showed a decrease in amino acid levels during the heat treatment of the tobaccos, indicating the possible involvement of amino acids in the formation of the pyrazines. Some pyrazines have been isolated from flue-cured (965) and burley tobaccos (937). The presence of pyrazines in tobaccos may be due to reactions of leaf precursors at the temperature used in curing of these tobacco types (1351). Amadori compounds are b-ketoamino acids that are structurally similar to b-hydroxyamino acids. Amadori compounds can yield pyrazines. Leffingwell (2337) and Green (1351) have both mentioned the presence of Amadori compounds in leaf, as has Tomita (3923), who stated that Amadori compounds account for as much as 2% of the dry weight of fluecured leaf. Thermal treatment of Amadori compounds does, in fact, give pyrazines as decomposition products [Shigematsu et al. (17B50)]. The formation of 2,5-bis-(tetrahydroxybutyl) pyrazine (fructosazine) from the reaction of fructose or glucose with alcoholic ammonia and from self-condensation of glucosamine or isoglucosamine has been known for a long time (17B57); in fact, the earliest reports date back to the beginning of the twentieth century. Deoxyfructosazine and its 2,6-isomer have been isolated from mixtures obtained by reaction of glucose and fructose with ammonia under weakly acidic conditions (1153, 1156, 17B13). The fructosazine and deoxyfructosazine isomers can be obtained synthetically by use of such sugar-ammonia reactions. The yields and isomer ratios are somewhat contingent on the choice of sugar (glucose or fructose) and the mole ratio of sugar to ammonium formate (1153). For example, xylose and aqueous ammonium formate yielded 2,5-bis (D-threo-trihydroxypropyl) pyrazine (xylulosazine) and the related 2,5- and 2,6-deoxyxylulosazines (1248). Several deoxyfructosazine isomers have been isolated from tobacco (1352). The tobacco-derived deoxyfructosazines were shown to improve the aroma and taste of tobacco (1351). Lynm (2420, 2421, 2423, 2424) at RJRT conducted several studies on the presence, formation, and analysis of deoxyfructosazines in tobacco and tobacco products. Two mechanisms have been suggested for pyrazine formation during smoking; pyrolytic decomposition of leaf constituents and nonenzymatic sugar-amine reactions. Kato et al. (2048) showed that direct pyrolysis of serine yielded pyrazine, methylpyrazine, ethylpyrazine, 2-ethyl-6-methylpyrazine, 2,6diethylpyrazine, and 2,6-diethyl-6-methylpyrazine. Pyrolysis of threonine gave 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, trimethylpyrazine,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 753
11/24/08 12:27:48 PM
754
and 2,5-dimethyl-3-ethylpyrazine. Sugars condense with amino acids to form sugar-amino acid adducts which then undergo Amadori rearrangement to give Amadori compounds. Although pyrolysis of selected leaf constituents generates pyrazines, the diversity and abundance of pyrazines in smoke cannot be adequately accounted for by this mechanism alone. Maga and Sizer (2439) and Enomoto et al. (17B12) have reviewed the occurrence of pyrazines in roasted foods and proposed pathways for pyrazine formation. Their summaries present a large array of pyrazines found in the flavor fractions of a number of roasted foods. It is striking that nearly all pyrazines commonly found in tobacco smoke have been identified in at least one roasted food. For example, 2,3-dimethylpyrazine has been found in peanuts, barley, coffee, baked potatoes, mushrooms, lamb fat, and tobacco smoke (1587a). Of particular interest in relating leaf to smoke composition are the studies of Koehler and co-workers (17B26, 17B27) on the formation of pyrazine compounds in sugar-amino acid systems. Using model systems, Koehler and Odell (17B27) showed that pyrazines are formed when sugars and amino acids are heated between 100 and 150°C. Glucose reacts with either an amino acid or ammonia to form a glycosylamine. The amino acid complex then undergoes a Strecker-type degradation to yield an eneaminol which can also be formed by the loss of water from glucosylamine. The eneaminol then isomerizes and undergoes reverse aldol condensation to form 1-aminoacetone which is known to self-condense to yield pyrazines (116). As shown by Schonberg and Moubacher (17B46), during the condensation of the aminoacetone further reaction with aldehydes can take place. Similar pathways can be postulated for the generation of 1-aminoacetaldehyde, 1-aminopropionaldehyde, and 1-amino-2-butanone from sugar-amine reactions. Hypothetical reaction of these aminocarbonyl compounds either individually or in pairs can account for most of the alkylpyrazines reported in smoke (1351). Additionally, Koehler and Odell (17B27) showed that a number of smaller compounds, acetaldehyde, glycerol, glyoxal, 2,3-butanedione, and acetol also yielded pyrazines when heated with nitrogen sources. Koehler et al. (17B26) had previously shown, using radiotracer techniques, that the sugar moiety served as the principal source of carbon atoms and that the amine furnished only nitrogen to the pyrazine molecule. These data imply that sugar decomposes to small intermediary carbonyl compounds which in turn react with the nitrogen source, for example, amine or amino acid, to form pyrazines. Other possible mechanisms for the formation of pyrazines during smoking are possible. For instance, leaf carbohydrates could be degraded either through pyrolysis or Maillard reactions to form a-dicarbonyl compounds, which could, in turn, react with amino acids to undergo a Strecker degradation forming
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
the a-aminocarbonyl compounds [1671a, 2439, Velisek et al. (17B59)] which can condense to form pyrazines (1351). Pyrazines are the most important N-heterocycles in characterizing the aroma and flavor of tobacco and tobacco smoke (2341, 3215, 3491, 3553). The alkylpyrazines, for example, provide the cocoa and nutty-type notes associated with tobacco smoke. 2-Acetylpyrazine [1-pyrazinylethanone], isolated and identified in burley tobacco by Roberts (3202, 3204) in 1963, contributes a nutty, popcorn-type flavor unique to tobacco smoke. Pyrazines, in general, contribute the “brown notes” associated with tobacco smoke taste (3215). It is obvious that cigarette MSS flavor and aroma may be enhanced by addition of appropriate pyrazine compounds to the tobacco blend, for example, among the 460 pure compounds listed by Doull et al. (1053) as possible cigarette tobacco ingredients used by U.S. cigarette manufacturers are twenty-three (5%) pyrazine derivatives. In 1977, RJRT conducted an immense study on Philip Morris’s Merit cigarette that advertised the use of a “flavor package.” One of the interesting results of that study was that the MSS from Merit contained numerous alkylpyrazines, particularly higher levels of tetramethylpyrazine, and several trimethylpyrazines compared to other commercial cigarettes brands of similar FTC “tar.” Much of the Merit research conducted at RJRT was summarized by Lloyd (2385a). XVII.B.4.4 Pyrimidines There are thirty-three pyrimidine derivatives identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The vast majority of these compounds (67%) have been identified in tobacco. Only fourteen are known to exist in tobacco smoke. As previously mentioned, the naturally occurring derivatives of pyrimidine are components of nucleic acids: cytosine, thymidine, and uracil. Free pyrimidine and functionalized pyrimidine compounds in tobacco are believed to be formed from the catabolism of various nucleosides (17B21). Several of the pyrimidinecontaining compounds in tobacco are agronomic chemical residues while other compounds identified in tobacco smoke are formed from those agronomic residues. Pyrimidine derivatives do not generally have positive flavor notes and are considered neutral to poor. Some pyrimidinederived flavors (although not found in tobacco or tobacco smoke) have meaty notes. There are also some pyrimidine flavorants that do possess good flavor potential for tobacco products, for example, 2-methyl-5,7-dihydrothieno[3,4-d]pyrimidine. This compound contains a bicyclic ring structure and has been identified in tobacco. 2-Methyl-5,7-dihydrothieno[3,4-d]pyrimidine is said to have a fresh roasted, sweet nut flavor with a popcorn character (17B22). It is a compound listed by Doull et al. as an ingredient in flavor formulations used by one or more members of the U.S. tobacco industry (1053).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 754
11/24/08 12:27:48 PM
755
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-2 Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 755
11/24/08 12:27:49 PM
756
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 756
11/24/08 12:27:50 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
757
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 757
11/24/08 12:27:51 PM
758
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 758
11/24/08 12:27:52 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
759
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 759
11/24/08 12:27:53 PM
760
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 760
11/24/08 12:27:54 PM
761
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 761
11/24/08 12:27:55 PM
762
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 762
11/24/08 12:27:56 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
763
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 763
11/24/08 12:27:57 PM
764
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 764
11/24/08 12:27:58 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
765
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 765
11/24/08 12:27:59 PM
766
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 766
11/24/08 12:28:02 PM
767
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 767
11/24/08 12:28:02 PM
768
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 768
11/24/08 12:28:03 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
769
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 769
11/24/08 12:28:04 PM
770
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 770
11/24/08 12:28:05 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
771
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 771
11/24/08 12:28:08 PM
772
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 772
11/24/08 12:28:08 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
773
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 773
11/24/08 12:28:09 PM
774
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 774
11/24/08 12:28:10 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
775
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 775
11/24/08 12:28:11 PM
776
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 776
11/24/08 12:28:12 PM
777
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 777
11/24/08 12:28:13 PM
778
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 778
11/24/08 12:28:16 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
779
Table XVII.B-2 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring
XVII.B.5 Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Containing a Five-Membered and a Six-Membered N-Containing Ring The origin of all the work that has been done on the isolation and identification of the tobacco and tobacco smoke began with this relatively small group of compounds. The initial tobacco and tobacco smoke compound that was of so
much interest was nicotine. Literally thousands of scientific articles, reviews, and books have been published on various aspects of nicotine, for example, pharmacological and metabolic properties, chemical and structural properties, occurrence, biogenesis, and pyrolysis. The scope of all the work on nicotine alkaloids is so broad that a comprehensive review is beyond the scope of this chapter. The several hundred references listed in Table XVII.B-4 testify to the enormous
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 779
11/24/08 12:28:17 PM
780
amount of research that has been conducted on the nicotine alkaloids. Instead, a brief history of the initial work on the isolation and identification of nicotine follows. XVII.B.5.1 Nicotine and Tobacco Alkaloids with a Six-Membered N-Containing Ring and a Second Five-Membered N-Containing Ring Nicotine is the unique component of tobacco. The history associated with the discovery of nicotine and use of the “oil” derived from tobacco dates to about 1571 (17B16). This “oil” prepared by the French chemist Gohory undoubtedly contained some level of nicotine and was used as a remedy for diseases of the skin. In 1660, another French chemist, Lefevre, described means to steam distill tobacco to obtain oil that had medicinal uses (3477). In 1807, Cerioli discovered what he called the “olio essenziale” of tobacco (17B15). In 1809, Vauquelin apparently made the same discovery. Both researchers described the oil as a volatile and colorless substance. Vauquelin recognized the basic nature of the material but failed to recognize its alkaloidal properties. He attributed the basicity of the material to the presence of ammonia (410). In 1822, Hermbstädt confirmed Vauquelin’s results of the presence of the oil described in sixteen different species of what is now known as Nicotiana (17B15). It was not until 1828 that Posselt and Reimann (2981) succeeded in isolating a pure sample of the oil and recognized it as an alkaloid. They characterized it as a water-clear liquid, boiling at 246°C under atmospheric pressure, and miscible with water, alcohol, and ether. They named the pure compound nicotine after Jean Nicot who introduced tobacco into the French court in about 1560 (17B42). In 1826, Unverdorben isolated a water-soluble base from a dry distillate of tobacco (282). The base contained nicotine. Melsens (2528), in 1843, succeeded in isolating nicotine from the smoke of pipe tobacco and assigned the empirical formula, C12H14N2 (2724). In 1893, Pinner (17B44) reported on the final clarification of the constitution of nicotine, determined via degradation studies. Pinner’s structural formula for nicotine was confirmed by the classical synthesis of nicotine by Pictet and Rotschy (17B43) in 1895. For many years, nicotine was believed to be the only alkaloid in tobacco (17B18). It was not until 1928 that Ehrenstein reported the identification of nornicotine in tobacco [see Markwood (17B38)]. Anabasine was isolated in tobacco by Smith (17B53) in 1935. Späth and Kesztler (17B55) isolated anatabine in tobacco in 1934 [Markwood (17B38)]. Gautier and LeBon in 1892 were the first chemists to clearly recognize that additional alkaloids accompanied nicotine in tobacco smoke. These additional alkaloids were the secondary alkaloids and decomposition products of alkaloids. Unfortunately, Gautier and LeBon did not report further on their observations (2223, 2224). Wenusch and Schöller (4210, 4211) in the early 1930s worked diligently to separate the secondary alkaloids in tobacco smoke. Though they were not wholly successful they did discover and determine the formula for myosmine in cigar smoke in 1936 with the collaboration of Späth (2224). By 1936, Wenusch and Schöller (4213)
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
had distinguished a large number of tobacco smoke bases in cigar and cigarette smoke by their behavior during steam distillation and extraction. Several of the alkaloid-related components (a-, b-, and g-socratine, obelin, lohitam, anodmin, lathraein, poikiline, and gudham) first reported by Wenusch and Schöller (4210, 4211) were subsequently demonstrated to be mixtures or mislabeled components of previously known alkaloids. Until the study by Kuffner, Schick, and Bühn in 1959, there was much confusion concerning the correct identity of the secondary alkaloids of tobacco smoke. Kuffner et al. (2224) demonstrated that obelin was a salt of ammonia, a- and b-socratine were mixtures of nicotyrine and 2,3’bipyridine, and g-socratine was l-nornicotine. Poikiline was characterized as 4-amino-1-(3-pyridyl)-butanone. Many of these characterization corrections are described in Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) and Borgerding et al. (410). To date, ninety-five alkaloids with both a five-membered and a six-membered N-containing ring have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke [see Table XVII.B-4]. In all cases, the six-membered ring is pyridine; the attached fivemembered ring may be a pyrrolidine, pyrroline, pyrrole, or an imidazole ring. The vast majority of these tobacco alkaloids contain a pyrrolidine ring that is substituted at the three-position of the pyridine ring. Table XVII.B-3 shows the distribution of the ninety-five tobacco alkaloids that occur in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and in both. Table XVII.B-4 lists the compounds containing a five-membered N-containing ring plus a six-membered N-containing ring that have been identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Sixty-two nicotine alkaloids have been identified in tobacco. Fifty-four have been identified in tobacco smoke and twentyone of the ninety-five nicotine alkaloids are found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The vast majority of the nicotine alkaloids (fifty-four of sixty-two) contain a pyrrolidine ring connected to a pyridine ring. The most common functionalities associated with the pyrrolidine-containing nicotine alkaloids are alkyl, nitroso, carboxyl, amino, and acyl groups.
Table XVII.B-3 Distribution of Components with a 6-Membered N-Containing Ring and a Second 5-Membered N-Containing Ring between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Number of Identified Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke with a 6- and a 5-Membered Ring Component
Total
Smoke
Tobacco
Pyridine Ring with a 2nd N-Containing Ring (Type) Pyrrolidine 72 34 54 (nicotinoids) Pyrroline 2 1 2 Pyrrole 19 18 5 Imidazole 2 1 1 Totals
95
54
62
Smoke and Tobacco 16 1 4 0 21
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 780
11/24/08 12:28:17 PM
781
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-4 Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 781
11/24/08 12:28:20 PM
782
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 782
11/24/08 12:28:20 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
783
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 783
11/24/08 12:28:21 PM
784
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 784
11/24/08 12:28:23 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
785
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 785
11/24/08 12:28:24 PM
786
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 786
11/24/08 12:28:25 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
787
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 787
11/24/08 12:28:26 PM
788
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 788
11/24/08 12:28:27 PM
789
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-4 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with a 6-and a 5-Membered N-Containing Ring
The structures of some of the most common tobacco alkaloids found in smoke are shown in Figure XVII.B-3. The transfer rate for nicotine is generally about 10% to 12% but a number of factors, including the cut width of the tobacco, the shape of the cigarette, the moisture content of the tobacco, and various tobacco additives can significantly affect nicotine delivery to mainstream smoke [Kuhn and Klus (2231), Hecht et al. (1580)]. Many of the alkaloids of tobacco smoke consist of components originally in the tobacco, which transfer unchanged, and various pyrolysis products of the nicotine alkaloids. Nicotine is a major precursor of a large number of volatile bases in tobacco smoke. On heating nicotine at temperatures greater than 400°C, various patterns of fragmentation occur
N H
N N Nicotine
N N
N
CH3
Nornicotine
O
CH3
Cotinine
N N
CH3
2',3'-Dehydronicotine
N
N H
N
N
Myosmine
Nicotyrine
Figure XVII.B-3 Common tobacco alkaloids found in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
depending on the gaseous atmosphere and other experimental conditions. Myosmine (4275a) and 3-cyanopyridine [Woodward et al. (17B61)] are two of many pyrolysis products of nicotine at 500 to 730°C. The yields and type of pyrolysis products depend on the substrate used to hold the alkaloid, the particular alkaloid tested, for example, nicotine or nornicotine, the temperature ramping regime, the final temperature attained, the holding time at maximum temperature, and reactor type employed for the pyrolysis experiment. The major identified pyrolytic products of nicotine at temperatures 400 and 900°C (in a nitrogen or helium atmosphere) include all of the compounds shown in Figure XVII.B-3. In addition to these compounds, ammonia, methylamine, and a number of smaller fragments are formed from heterolytic cleavage of nicotine. Nicotine is not fragmented significantly at temperatures below 600°C in reactors without packing. At reactor temperatures of 600°C (with samples in an inert atmosphere) about two-thirds of the nicotine is split mainly into myosmine (1’,2’-dehydronornicotine) and 3-vinylpyridine. At 700°C, nicotine is completely decomposed, with the major products being 3-vinylpyridine, 3-methylpyridine, and pyridine. At 800 and 900°C, extensive cleavage and recombination of fragments occur to yield such products as quinoline, naphthalene, and benzonitrile. From examination of the pyrolysis products produced, dehydrogenation, demethylation, and scission of the pyrrolidine ring are initial steps in the pyrolysis of nicotine. In a Cl-C2 fragmentation of this ring, dehydrogenation of the resulting N-methylaminoalkyl chain would give metanicotine which,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 789
11/24/08 12:28:28 PM
790
on further elimination, produces the observed 3-(1,3-butadienyl) pyridine and subsequently 3-vinylpyridine by appropriate cleavage. Fragmentation of the pyrrolidine ring in the 2,3- or 1,5 positions might ultimately give 3-cyanopyridine after dealkylation of the side chain (3797). The mechanism of thermal degradation of nornicotine is generally similar to nicotine although differences in thermostability exist (175, 17B25). Nornicotine is less stable than nicotine and the pyrrolidine ring fragments at temperatures below 400°C. At 400°C (in an inert atmosphere) myosmine and 3-methylpyridine are major pyrolytic products, but at 500°C only a small amount of myosmine is formed. Since myosmine is relatively stable (44% unchanged) on pyrolysis at 500°C, this compound may not be an intermediate of nornicotine pyrolysis at higher temperatures (175). An alternative explanation is that myosmine formed from nornicotine may react with other pyrolytic products which are not produced when myosmine is pyrolyzed alone. Although the available evidence is sparse, it appears that the pyrolytic mechanism of myosmine is different from that of nicotine and nornicotine (175). At 500°C (in an inert atmosphere) myosmine gives lower yields of 3-methylpyridine and 3-ethylpyridine and higher yields of 3-cyanopyridine than nornicotine. This pattern may indicate that a C3-C4 split is favored in the five-membered ring; scission of this bond might be preferred over a C2-C3 fragmentation adjacent to the relatively stable C=N bond (3797). Studies with cigarettes treated with 14C-nicotine have been valuable in determining the delivery of nicotine and its pyrolysis products to MSS and sidestream smoke (SSS). These experiments were reviewed in 1975 by Jenkins et al. (1933a). In a typical study with nicotine-2’-14C, the total 14C-activity in mainstream total particulate matter (TPM) was 15.4% of the original activity in the tobacco burned, while the contribution of the alkaloids to mainstream TPM was 14.9% (1836). Thus, 96.8% of the 14C- activity of the mainstream TPM was due to transfer of alkaloids and 3.2% was due to products formed from nicotine during smoking; mainstream gas phase (4.1%) contained only pyrolysis products. In the sidestream TPM, 41.1% of the original 14C was detected, that is, 10% of this material was decomposition products. Sidestream gas phase (16.3%) exclusively comprised pyrolysis products. Most of the remaining 14Cactivity (20.2%) was found in the butt. Thus, approximately 30% of nicotine in a cigarette is converted to products that appear in the SSS and MSS. Pyrolysis studies on nicotine, discussed in the previous section, indicate that pyridines would comprise a significant portion of the particulate-phase products. However, nicotine can undergo other transformations during smoking, including reactions with nitrogen oxides (1580). These are discussed in the chapter on nitrosamines (see Chapter 15). Several studies have been conducted on the fate of nicotine during smoking. Jenkins and Comes (17B20) and Perfetti (2920–2922, 2924) have examined the fate of exogenous vs. endogenous transfer of nicotine during smoking. These authors concluded that the transfer into smoke of exogenous nicotine (regardless of its form [free base or salt, d- or l- conformation]) was similar to that of endogenous material, in contrast to observations with tobacco sterols. Thus, use of 14C-nicotine in
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
tracer studies on cigarette smoke is justified. A comparison of the fate of 14C-nicotine in a pyrolysis study vs. its fate during the smoking of a cigarette resolved a long-standing disagreement between those investigators who maintained that the fate of a compound on pyrolysis at a temperature similar to that in a burning cigarette was the same as the fate of that compound in a smoked cigarette and those who maintained that the fates would definitely be different. Schmeltz et al. (3512), with 14C-nicotine in a study on pyrolysis vs. cigarette smoking, reported that the fates were quite different. On the basis of their findings, they stated: “These results suggest to us that pyrolysis experiments may be of limited value for establishing the fate of nicotine and possibly other tobacco components in a burning cigarette.” The transfer rate of nornicotine during smoking is significantly lower than that of nicotine, with typical values ranging from 5% to 8% [Glock and Wright (1316), Haag and Larson (17B14)]. When high nornicotine tobaccos were smoked, significant increases in the levels of myosmine were observed compared to conventional burley cigarettes. Similar results were obtained when cigarettes were enriched with nornicotine (1316). Thus, nornicotine is not only an efficient precursor for pyridines, but also for myosmine as previously mentioned. This is thought to contribute to the unfavorable taste of smoke from nornicotinerich (so-called “Cherry-red”) tobacco. The ease of formation of myosmine from nornicotine is likely to be an important factor in its relatively low transfer rate. The nicotine alkaloids contribute substantially to the unique flavor of tobacco smoke, mainly due to their rather large concentration in tobacco and their rather substantial transfer to tobacco smoke. The nicotine alkaloids as a class are not considered positive flavorants as they contribute a harsh, irritating flavor to the smoke. Nicotine and its contribution to smoking satisfaction is a subject unto itself that is fraught with numerous social and scientific controversies and will not be discussed here. It is well known that tobacco products that contain no or very low levels of nicotine (for numerous reasons) have never found consumer acceptance or commercial success. XVII.B.5.2 Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke with Two or More SixMembered N-Containing Rings In tobacco and tobacco smoke, the seventy-six identified compounds with two or more six-membered N-containing rings (Table XVII.B-5) include 2,2‘-bipiperidine, several bipyridines, anatabine-type compounds, anabasine-type compounds, anatalline, and nicotelline-type compounds. They are distributed as follows:
1. A total of thirty-nine bipyridines, the majority of which are derivatives of 2,3’-bipyridine, plus several 2,2’-, 2,4’-, 3,3’-, and 4,4’-bipyridine derivatives. 2. Anatabine and anabasine derivatives, which number sixteen and fifteen, respectively. 3. Three compounds with two pyridine rings and a piperidine ring [anatalline (2,4-di(3-pyridinyl)piperidine] and anabasamine [5-(2-piperidinyl)-2,3’bipyridine] plus its methyl derivative].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 790
11/24/08 12:28:28 PM
791
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-5 Distribution of Components with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Number of Identified Compounds in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke with Two 6-Membered N-Containing Rings Component
Total
Smoke
Tobacco
Smoke and Tobacco
Compounds with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings (Type) 1 0 1 0 Piperidine + piperidine 15 11 8 4 Pyridine + piperidine (anabasine-type) 39 38 8 7 Pyridine + pyridine (bipyridines) 16 12 9 5 Pyridine + di- or tetrahydro-pyridine (anatabine-type) 3 1 3 1 2 Pyridines + piperidine 3 Pyridines 2 2 2 2 Totals 76 64 31 19
4. Two compounds with three pyridines, the so-called terpyridines, one of which is nicotelline (3,2’:4’,3’’terpyridine). 5. One bipiperidine compound has been identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke (2,2‘bipiperidine).
Of the seventy-six compounds in this class, sixty-four have been identified in tobacco smoke, thirty-one have been identified in tobacco, and nineteen in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Figure XVII.B-4 illustrates the structures of some of the common tobacco alkaloids found in tobacco and tobacco smoke with two or more six-membered N-containing rings. Although nicotine is the principal alkaloid in commercial tobaccos (Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana rustica), nornicotine is the main alkaloid in most other species of Nicotiana. Anabasine is the third most abundant tobacco alkaloid. Anabasine is found in the stem of the Nicotiana glauca plant. Anatabine has been reported as a minor alkaloid in the roots of these plants, although it is present also in the leaf and stem H N
H N
2,2'-Bipiperidine
N
N H
Anatabine
5 6
4 N
3
4'
2'
N 2,3'-Bipyridine
N
N H
Anabasine
(3491). All of the alkaloids in Figure XVII.B-4, including bipiperidine, the bipyridines, anatabine, anabasine, anatalline, and nicotelline, can be biosynthesized from lysine and nicotinic acid in Nicotiana species to some extent depending on the species (429b, see KEGG, Alkaloid biosynthesis II — Reference pathway, EC-Number 1.1.1.206, Pathway 00960, see http:// www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway/map/map00960.html). Nicotelline (3,2’:4’,3’’-terpyridine) is another minor alkaloid of tobacco initially isolated from tobacco by Kuffner and Kaiser (17B28). It was originally believed be formed by the condensation of two molecules of nicotinoylacetic acid (17B31), although this compound could also result from the degradation of nicotine. However, feeding experiments of [2’-14C]-nicotine or ethyl [carbonyl-14C]-nicotinoyl acetate to tobacco (17B58) failed to yield labeled nicotelline. Currently, nicotelline and anatalline [2,4-di(3-pyridinyl)-piperidine] are considered to be formed by the trimerization of dihydropyridines from nicotinic acid (17B23). A similar reaction is proposed for the formation of the terpyridines. These alkaloids are possibly artifacts produced by nonenzymatic reactions which could occur during the harvesting and curing of tobacco. The lack of optical activity in the isolated anatalline supports this hypothesis (17B31). Various bipyridines are also formed during tobacco fermentation [Frankenburg and Gottscho (1223)]. As much as 3% of the nicotine originally present in cigar tobacco was converted to 2,3’-bipyidine and other oxidative compounds (3973). One study by Dubinin and Chelintsev (1075a) reported on the pyrolytic products of anabasine heated at 580 to 650°C in a charcoal-filled reactor. Exclusive of gases, the major products were reported to be pyridine, 2-methylpyridine, 2-ethylpyridine, 5-methylisoquinoline, and 2,3’-bipyridine. The preponderance of the 2-alkylpyridines might indicate preferential cleavage of the pyridine ring, which would be unexpected; evaluation of these findings is difficult since the use of charcoal in the reactor may have produced a catalytic effect and altered the pyrolytic reactions markedly (3797). In terms of the flavor potential of this class of compounds, very little is known. A minor tobacco alkaloid, 2,3’-bipyridine, has been reported (17B19) to exhibit a sensitizing effect on tobacco flavor and to suppress astringency (3215, 17B52). Table XVII.B-6 lists the compounds containing two or more six-membered N-containing rings identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
H
5' 6'
N N N
2,2'-Bipyridine N
N-Methylanabasine HN
N N Nicotelline
CH3
N
N Anatalline
Figure XVII.B-4 Common tobacco alkaloids found in tobacco and tobacco smoke with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 791
11/24/08 12:28:29 PM
792
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-6 Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 792
11/24/08 12:28:30 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
793
Table XVII.B-6 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 793
11/24/08 12:28:31 PM
794
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-6 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 794
11/24/08 12:28:31 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
795
Table XVII.B-6 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 795
11/24/08 12:28:32 PM
796
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.B-6 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 796
11/24/08 12:28:33 PM
797
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.B-6 (Continued) Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings
Detailed examination of the lists presented in this chapter on monocyclic nitrogen heterocycles indicates 709 compounds have been identified to date in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The data are summarized in Table XVII.B-7.
It is obvious from the tabulation that the six-membered N-containing ring compounds with one or more nitrogens represent nearly 75% of the compounds identified to date.
Table XVII.B-7 Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Compounds with 6-Membered Rings, with a 5- and a 6-Membered Ring, or with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings Ring Type 6-Membered Ring with One or More Nitrogens
No. of Compds. (No. of Agronomic Chemicals)
Pyridine Ring with a 2nd N-Containing Ring (Type)
Piperidines
37
Tetrahydropyridines
5
Pyrrolidine (nicotinoids) Pyrroline
Dihydropyridines
6
Pyrrole
Pyridines
341 (4)a
Imidazole
Piperazines Dihydropyridazine Pyrazines Pyrimidines 1,2,4-Triazines 1,3,5-Triazines
10 3 (3)b 100 (1)c 33 (4)d 2 (1)e 1 (1)f
Totals
538
a b c d e f g h
No. of Compds. (No. of Agronomic Chemicals) 72 (2)g 2 19 2 (1)h
Compounds with Two or More 6-Membered N-Containing Rings (Type) Piperidine + piperidine Pyridine + piperidine (anabasine-type) Pyridine + pyridine (bipyridines) Pyridine + di- or tetrahydropyridine (anatabine-type) 2 Pyridines + piperidine 3 Pyridines
95
No. of Compds. (No. of Agronomic Chemicals) 1 15 39 16 3 2
76
Chlorpyrofos® (insecticide), Chlorpyriphos® (insecticide), Nitrapyrin® (bacteriocide), Picloram® (herbicide) Maleic hydrazide and salts (herbicide) Thionazine® (insecticide) Primicarb® (insecticide), Pirimiphos-methyl® (insecticide), Dimetherimol® (fungicide), Diazinon®, (insecticide) Metribuzin® (herbicide) Anilazine® (fungicide) Black Leaf 40® (insecticide) Admire® (insecticide)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 797
11/24/08 12:28:34 PM
798
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
XVII.C Lactams Kosak (2170) listed no lactam identified in tobacco smoke prior to 1954. In 1959, Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed cotinine as an alkaloid in tobacco and smoke. They did not categorize it or any other tobacco or smoke component as a lactam. In its 1963 monograph on tobacco and smoke components, Philip Morris (2939) listed cotinine as a tobacco and smoke component. Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884), in their 1980 monograph on tobacco smoke components, listed a total of seventy-two amides, imides, and lactams; a total of sixteen lactams was listed [see Table I-15 in (1884)]. The reference for all of the sixteen lactams listed was Schumacher et al. (3553). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Working Group met in 1985 to assess the carcinogenic risk from tobacco smoking. Its monograph summarizing the IARC findings was published in 1986. In it, the IARC stated that there was a large spectrum of amides, imides, and lactams in tobacco smoke (including some fifty aliphatic amides) [see p.109 in (1870)]. The IARC view on these three compound classes was based on the 1977 review by Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) and publications in 1977 and 1981 by Schumacher et al. (3553) and Heckman and Best (1587), respectively. Of the thirty-five lactams reported in tobacco smoke by Schumacher et al. (3553) at the 1975 Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference (TCRC) and published in 1977, twentyone were new to the tobacco smoke literature. As noted in Chapter 13 and Chapter 14, used in this study was a recently developed analytical technology that permitted fractionation and identification of the water-soluble components of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). Similarly in their 1978 TCRC presentation and 1981 publication, Heckman and Best (1587) reported the identification of two additional new lactams in tobacco smoke, 3-ethyl-5-methylene-3-pyrrolid-2-one and N-methyl-5-(1-methylethylidene)-3-pyrrolid-2-one. They also confirmed the presence in tobacco smoke of many of the lactams previously reported (3553). In his earlier study of the mainstream smoke from an all-burley tobacco cigarette, Heckman (1986) identified eight lactams. Lactams frequently reported in both tobacco and its smoke but seldom classified as lactams are 1-methyl-5-(3-pyridinyl)2-pyrrolidinone (cotinine) and several of its derivatives such as norcotinine. Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed them as alkaloids [see Table I-12 in (1884)] not lactams. Examination of the structures of several of the CSC components indicates that the decision regarding their categorization is somewhat difficult. In Figure XVII.C-IA, representative structures for an imide and a lactam are presented. To which of these categories—imide or lactam—should the smoke component 1,7-dihydro-6H-purine-2,6-dione (xanthene) {I} be assigned? Its structure {I} is depicted in Figure XVII.C-IB. In Structure {II} in Figure XVII.C-1B, its imide configuration is accentuated. Structure {III} illustrates that two lactam configurations exist in the xanthene molecule. This same situation is present with the other purine-derived smoke components. Although there may be some disagreement on the preciseness of our selection, for the sake of completeness
O
O
N H Imide configuration
O N H Lactam configuration
Figure XVII.C-1A The imide and lactam configurations.
O
N N H
N H
NH O
O
N N H
NH N H
O
N N H
O
I II 6H-Purine-2,6-dione, 1,7-dihydro-(xanthine) (CAS No. 69-89-6)
NH N H
O
III
Figure XVII.C-1B The imide {II} and lactam {III} configurations in 1,7-dihydro-6H-purine-2,6-dione (xanthine) {I}.
such components are listed in each chapter in its major catalog table. As a result, the total number of components in each of the major catalog tables may be slightly inflated. Table XVII.C-1 lists a total of 118 lactams identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Of the 118, thirty-five were identified in tobacco, ninety-seven were identified in tobacco smoke, and fourteen were identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke.
XVII.D Oxazoles and Oxazines Several oxazoles and oxazines have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Oxazoles are generally known as 1,3-azoles or five-membered-ring aromatic heterocyclic compounds with an oxygen and a nitrogen separated by one carbon. Oxazole is the parent compound. Isoxazoles are in this same family of compounds and are generally known as 1,2-azoles. These five-membered-ring aromatic heterocyclic compounds contain adjacent oxygen and nitrogen atoms. Oxazole is an analog of imidazole where the nitrogen atom in position 1 is replaced by oxygen. Isoxazole is an analog of pyrazole, that is, the nitrogen atom at position 1 is replaced by oxygen [Gilchrist (17D01)]. Oxazolidine and isoxazolidine are the reduced forms of oxazole and isoxazole, respectively. Several oxazolidine and isoxazolidine derivatives, for example, oxazolidinediones and isoxazolidinones, have also been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. One other component identified in tobacco is related to the oxazoles and isoxazole. It is an oxadiazole derivative, N-(4-bromophenyl)5-(1-naphthalenylmethyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine. Benzoxazole is a heterocyclic aromatic organic compound with a fused benzene-oxazole ring structure. Benzoxazole (1-oxa-3-azaindene) and several alkylated benzoxazoles have been identified in tobacco smoke. Benzoxazoles found in
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 798
11/24/08 12:28:35 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
799
Table XVII.C-1 Lactams in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 799
11/24/08 12:28:36 PM
800
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.C-1 (Continued) Lactams in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 800
11/24/08 12:28:37 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
801
Table XVII.C-1 (Continued) Lactams in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 801
11/24/08 12:28:38 PM
802
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.C-1 (Continued) Lactams in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 802
11/24/08 12:28:39 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
803
Table XVII.C-1 (Continued) Lactams in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 803
11/24/08 12:28:40 PM
804
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.C-1 (Continued) Lactams in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
tobacco smoke are believed to arise by the mutual condensation of the oxazole and benzene rings during the combustion/ pyrolysis of tobacco (1884). The only substituted benzoxazole known in tobacco is residue from the organophosphate insecticide Phosalone®. Oxazines are six-membered-ring analogs of piperazine where the nitrogen atom in position 4 is replaced by an oxygen atom. The oxazines in tobacco and tobacco smoke are morpholine and several morpholine derivatives. The most discussed morpholine recently is N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR). This volatile N-nitrosamine (NMOR) has been identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Morpholine is an organic heterocycle that features both amine and ether functional groups. Morpholine is also called tetrahydro-1,4oxazine. Figure XVII.D-1 illustrates the parent structures of the oxazoles and oxazines identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Numerous reviews have been written on the compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke over the last five
decades (1884, 1900, 1971, 2170, 2270, 2939, 3224, 3797). Few have listed the oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Latimer (2270) in 1955 listed 231 compounds identified from tobacco and tobacco smoke. In his review, he listed tetrahydro-2-methyl-6-(3pyridyl)-1,2-oxazine, a tobacco alkaloid, as the first oxazine identified in tobacco smoke. Roberts et al. in 1975 (3224) listed 2783 compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In their report, five oxazole-related compounds identified in tobacco smoke were listed (2,4-dimethylbenzoxazole, 2-methylbenzoxazole, oxazolidinedione, 5-ethyl-N-methyl2,4-oxazolidinedione, and 5-methyl-2,4-oxazolidinedione). Roberts et al. did not report any oxazole- or oxazine-related compounds found in tobacco. In 1980, Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed 1889 identified tobacco smoke components in their monograph, only six oxazole-related compounds were listed (dimethyloxazole, 5-methyl-2,4-oxazolidinedione, 2,4-oxazolidinedione, 3,4,5-trimethylisoxazole, 2-methylbenzoxazole, and 2,5-dimethylbenzoxazole). The citations
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 804
11/24/08 12:28:41 PM
805
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
O
O N
Oxazole
O
N
H N
N
O
NH Oxazolidine
4 N
O Isoxazole
3 N
2 O 1 1,3,4-Oxadiazole
Isoxazolidine
Benzoxazole
H N
5
O Morpholine
Figure XVII.D-1 Parent structures of the oxazoles and oxazines identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
by Ishiguro and Sugawara for all but the dimethyloxazole were to the Schumacher et al. (3553) and Newell et al. (2769) reports on tobacco smoke composition. Roberts in 1988 (3215) tabulated 5868 identified compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. By functional groups, 3044 compounds had been identified in tobacco, 3996 had been identified in smoke, and 1172 were identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. A large portion of the oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke was originally identified by employees at the Research and Development Department of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) who were highly proficient in the isolation and identification of compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. From 1955 until 1988, they reported on nineteen (of the forty-four) oxazoleand oxazine-related compounds in smoke and six (of the fourteen) oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds in burley, Maryland, flue-cured, Oriental, and Perique tobaccos (965, 1075, 1360, 1364, 1375a, 1586, 1587, 1590, 2270, 2337, 2339a 2761, 2762, 2765, 2766, 2767, 2769, 2775, 2777, 3547, 3549, 3550, 3553, 3557). Demole (4570a) at Firmenich (Geneva, Switzerland), under contract to RJRT, identified twenty-five additional oxazoles in cigarette smoke condensate. Oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds do not appear to be endogenous in green tobacco but are found in tobaccos that undergo heat treatments during curing and tobacco processing (965, 1590, 2337, 2339c, 2359). Additionally, it is known that in certain biomolecules, oxazoles can result from the cyclization and oxidation of serine or threonine nonribosomal peptides (17D02). Whether similar reactions occur in tobacco is not known. The Maillard or nonenzymatic browning reaction has generated much interest over the past seventy years [Nagodawithana (17D07)]. The Maillard reaction mainly involves the reaction of free amino groups of amino acids and reducing sugars (17D07). The principal chemistry of this reaction was reviewed by Hodge in 1953 (17D03). The aromas in most thermally processed foods, such as bread, cereal products, roasted peanuts, and roasted coffee, are generated during Maillard reactions [Maga (17D05, 17D06)]. Numerous heterocyclic compounds arising from the Maillard reaction have been identified in food
and model systems. These heterocycles include furans, thiazoles, thiophenes, oxazoles, pyrroles, pyridines, and pyrazines (17D07). Several mechanisms have been proposed for the formation of oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds in food flavors, including the Strecker degradation (17D04). For example, hydroxyacid amides can react with acetone to produce oxazoles. Similar reaction products from the Maillard reaction and Strecker degradation are known in tobacco (965, 1590, 2337, 2339c, 2359). Maga (17D06) has reviewed the occurrence of oxazoles and oxazolines in a variety of processed food systems. Most of them possess green, sweet, and nutty aroma qualities and have been identified in coffee, soy sauce, wheat, and cooked beef and some of them have very low odor thresholds. In 1976, Leffingwell discussed how certain flavorants (reaction products) can be produced in tobacco and tobacco smoke (2337). Because of the complexity of the chemical interactions and transformations involved, the types and ratios of active flavor products formed by nonenzymatic browning are dependent on the reaction conditions that may occur during aging or during the smoking process itself. One of the flavorants discussed by Leffingwell (2337) that was identified in tobacco by Lloyd et al. (2389) was 3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(phenylmethyl)-1H-pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4] oxazine-6-carboxaldehyde. This particular tobacco flavor has a hot peppery characteristic (2337). Leffingwell and Alford (2339a) and Li et al. (2359) identified 2,4,5-trimethyloxazole in Perique and burley tobacco, respectively, and reported it has a boiled beef, nutty, sweet, and green flavor. The application of oxazole-and oxazine-related flavor compounds to tobacco is not normally undertaken because the flavor and aroma characteristics of these compounds are rather weak. No oxazole- or oxazine-related compound was included in the list by Doull et al. (1053) of individual flavor compounds used by one or more of the U.S. cigarette manufacturers or individual flavor compounds used outside the United States [see Tables 1 and 7A in (3266)]. Agrochemical residues containing an oxazole-related functionality that have been found on tobacco include Clomazone®, a broad spectrum herbicide, Phosalone®, an organophosphate
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 805
11/24/08 12:28:41 PM
806
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.D-1 The Distribution of Oxazole- and Oxazine-Related Compounds Identified in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Oxazole-Related Compounds
Total No. Compounds
Tobacco
Smoke
Both
Agrochemical Product
Benzoxazole Isoxazole Oxazole Oxazolidine Morpholine
9 4 30 4 9
1 3 1 1 8
8 1 29 3 3
0 0 0 0 2
1 1 0 1 1
Total
56
14
44
2
4
commonly used as an insecticide, and Vinclozolin®, a common fungicide. Dimethomorph® or Acrobat® is a common fungicide used on tobacco that contains morpholine functionality. Analytical measurements for the determination and quantification of oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke include gas chromatography (GC) with packed or capillary columns, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) usually with reverse phase (RP) columns, and mass spectrometry (MS) methods (GC-MS and LC-MS). Table XVII.D-1 lists the distribution of oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. A total of fifty-six compounds have been identified: nine are benzoxazole derivatives, four are isoxazole derivatives, thirty are oxazole derivatives, four are oxazolidine derivatives, and nine are morpholine derivatives. Fourteen of the compounds are found in tobacco, forty-four are found in tobacco smoke, and two are found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Table XVII.D-2 lists the fifty-six oxazoleand oxazine-related compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke.
XVII.E Aza-Arenes An aza-arene is defined as a fused ring compound with two or more fused rings and consisting only of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. Alkyl-substituted derivatives are also included in the aza-arene category. Overall, many of the aza-arenes are structurally comparable to the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) but include at least one nitrogen in the ring. In his early 1954 compilation of reported tobacco smoke components, Kosak (2170) listed no fused-ring polycyclic nitrogen compounds in tobacco smoke, the class of compounds subsequently termed the aza-arenes. Five years later, the only fused-ring N-heterocyclic compound listed by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) as a tobacco smoke component was the bicyclic compound quinoline. Except for the replacement of a –CH= linkage with a nitrogen (–N=) at the 1-position, quinoline is structurally similar to the PAH naphthalene (Figure XVII.E-1). However, the reference cited by Johnstone and Plimmer was the 1929 study by Gabelya and Kipriyanov (1263), who described the identification of quinoline in a “destructive
distillate” of tobacco, not in a sample of tobacco smoke prepared by a tobacco smoking procedure. A similar identification of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) in the destructive distillate of tobacco by Roffo (3323, 3325) was criticized by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), who asserted that a tobacco destructive distillate was not tobacco smoke. In 1960, Van Duuren et al. (4027), in an extension of their studies on the tumorigenic PAHs in mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC), described their findings on tumorigenic N-heterocyclic compounds in the CSC. They reported the identification of dibenz[a,h]acridine {I}, dibenz[a,j]acridine {II}, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III} (Figure XVII.E-2) in CSC at per cigarette levels of 0.1 ng, 2.7 ng, and 0.7 ng, respectively. These levels were substantially less than that of the reported per cigarette yield of B[a]P in the late 1950s or early 1960s. Similar to the situation noted above that quinoline is a nitrogen analog of naphthalene, dibenz[a,h]acridine {I} is a nitrogen analog of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h] A) {IV}. These two compounds are dimensionally similar. Over five decades ago, these three N-heterocyclics had been reported as tumorigenic to mouse skin [see the summary by Hartwell (1544)]. Two of these compounds, dibenz[a,h] acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine, were also reported by Van Duuren et al. to be present in the pyrolysates (750°C, nitrogen atmosphere) from both nicotine and pyridine. Contradictory findings have been reported on the presence or absence of these three N-heterocyclic compounds, for example, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) reported that members of their research group, Candeli et al. (587), were able to confirm the presence of dibenz[a,j]acridine but not dibenz[a,h]acridine in mainstream CSC. The per cigarette yield of dibenz[a,j]acridine reported by Candeli et al. was significantly greater than that reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027), 10.0 ng/cigarette vs. 2.7 ng/cigarette. Other than brief mentions by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) of the results obtained by Candeli et al. (587) on dibenz[a,j]acridine in CSC, the experimental procedures involved in its identification do not appear to have been published in the usual way in a peer-reviewed journal. At a mainstream smoke (MSS) yield for dibenz[a,j]acridine of 2.7 ng/cigarette or 10.0 ng/ cigarette, as reported by Van Duuren et al. and Candeli et al., respectively, it is difficult to understand why no confirmation
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 806
11/24/08 12:28:42 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
807
Table XVII.D-2 Oxazoles- and Oxazine-Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 807
11/24/08 12:28:42 PM
808
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.D-2 (Continued) Oxazoles- and Oxazine-Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 808
11/24/08 12:28:43 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
809
Table XVII.D-2 (Continued) Oxazoles- and Oxazine-Related Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 809
11/24/08 12:28:44 PM
810
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
N Quinoline
of investigators to confirm the presence of the two dibenzacridines and the 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in nicotine pyrolysates. They wrote: Naphthalene
Figure XVII.E-1 Quinoline and naphthalene.
of the presence of this aza-arene had been reported by highly competent investigators from the early 1960s through the mid-1990s! Similarly, no confirmations of the presence of dibenz[a,h]acridine or 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole have been presented to date. Studies on these and other aza-arenes in cigarette MSS or nicotine pyrolysates are described briefly in the following paragraphs. The question remains: Was the preliminary isolation procedure (vacuum distillation of the smoke condensate at 100°C, 0.5 mm pressure) used by Van Duuren et al. (4027) responsible for the formation of the dibenzacridines and the dibenzocarbazole? In 1970, Kaburaki et al. (2006) reported the results of their detailed study of the pyrolysis of nicotine at various temperatures in air and in an inert atmosphere (nitrogen). They did not report the identification of the two tumorigenic benzacridines reported previously by Van Duuren et al. (4027) as identified components in their nicotine pyrolysates. From their study of the pyrolysis of several nitrogenous components of tobacco, including nicotine, Schmeltz et al. (3499) reported: We could not detect benzo(a)pyrene in nicotine pyrolyzates, nor could we confirm the presence of the physiologically active dibenzacridines and dibenzcarbazole [sic] reported in tobacco smoke and in nicotine and pyridine pyrolyzates by Van Duuren [4027].
In their review of the pyrogenesis of tobacco smoke components, Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) emphasized these reported findings, that is, the failures of several groups
N I
N II
N H III
IV
Figure XVII.E-2 Some polycyclic components of tobacco smoke.
Since nicotine is the most abundant and best known tobacco alkaloid, its pyrolysis has been thoroughly studied [Woodward et al. (4275a), Jarboe and Rosene (1923a)]. More recent work [Kaburaki et al. (2006)] on the pyrolysis of nicotine and various alkyl-pyridines has resulted in a proposed mechanism for the thermal degradation of nicotine … Schmeltz [Schmeltz et al. (3499)] also studied nicotine and identified a number of previously unreported compounds in the nicotine pyrolysates … These included pyrrole, acenaphthene, indole, skatole, and anthracene and/or phenanthrene. However, the presence of dibenzacridines and dibenzcarbazole, previously reported in nicotine and pyridine pyrolysates, could not be confirmed [Van Duuren et al. (4027)].
Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), in their review of the N-containing components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, discussed the generation of various pyridines from nicotine during both the actual smoking process and pyrolysis. They did report the identification by Van Duuren et al. (4027) of the two dibenzacridines in cigarette smoke and nicotine pyrolysate. They did not, however, comment on the reports issued between 1960 and 1977 on the inability of several other groups of investigators [Candeli et al. (587), Kaburaki et al. (2006), Schmeltz et al. (3499)] to confirm the 1960 findings of Van Duuren et al. (4027). In 1979, Schmeltz et al. (3512) reported their results from an elaborate study on the fate of radiolabeled nicotine during pyrolysis and during the actual smoking of a radiolabeled nicotine-treated cigarette. Their major findings included: (1) Under combustion-tube pyrolysis conditions, nicotine in either silica gel matrix (pyrolysis temperatures at 600°C, 750°C, or 900°C) or tobacco matrix (pyrolysis temperature at 600°C) underwent extensive degradation to a mixture of pyridines, quinolines, arylnitriles, and aromatic hydrocarbons. (2) In a burning cigarette during actual smoking, a substantial portion of the nicotine (about 41%) remains intact, 12.5% is oxidized to carbon dioxide, as much as 11% is degraded to volatile alkylpyridines, and negligible amounts are converted to neutral or acidic components of the particulate phase. (3) Dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine reported nearly two decades earlier by Van Duuren et al. (4027) were not identified in this study by Schmeltz et al. (3512). They noted: In ongoing studiesa we are now identifying those compounds that are formed from nicotine only as minor compounds (<0.1%) which nevertheless can contribute to the toxicity of the smoke. To this group of minor smoke constituents having nicotine as a precursor belong the dibenzacridines [Van Duuren et al. (4027)] … No report of the confirmation of the presence of the dibenzacridines (or the dibenzocarbazole) as a result of these ongoing studies has been found to date.
a
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 810
11/24/08 12:28:45 PM
811
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
(4) From the experimental results, the authors concluded: “Pyrolysis experiments may be of limited value for establishing the fate of nicotine and possibly other tobacco components in a burning cigarette.” (5) The pyrolysis system used in this study [see Higman et al. (1648)] was designed, according to Higman et al., to be the optimum simulation of the smoking process. Obviously, nicotine did not behave in this pyrolysis system as it did in the burning cigarette during actual smoking. Close examination of the text and the conclusions expressed in the 1979 Schmeltz et al. publication on the fate of nicotine during pyrolysis and during actual smoking reveals that at least two of the authors (Hoffmann and Schmeltz) have definitely changed their opinion with regard to their long-held view on the supposed equivalence of compound behavior during pyrolysis and actual smoking; for example, Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) earlier wrote in support of this equivalence: Most pyrolysis studies with tobacco, tobacco extracts, extract fractions, individual components, and tobacco additives are performed in a nitrogen atmosphere. This procedure has often been criticized on the grounds that many of the toxic constituents formed during smoking of tobacco products occur as a result of combustion in air rather than in a nitrogen atmosphere. This criticism, however, cannot
be maintained in view of studies by Newsome and Keith [2780] which demonstrated that a reducing rather than an oxidizing atmosphere exists at the cone region of a burning cigarette.
With regard to the production of dibenzacridines and the dibenzocarbazole from nicotine during pyrolysis and the smoking process, Table XVII.E-1 summarizes the current state of knowledge. For example, authors of numerous articles in the 1980s [Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)], in the 1990s [Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), Hoffmann et al. (1773), OSHA (2825), Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741)], and in the 2000s [Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743), Hoffmann et al. (1744), and Fowles and Bates (1217)] on the toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke repeatedly listed dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole as tumorigenic or adversely biologically active MSS components despite the following: (1) The presence of these three azaarenes in MSS had not been confirmed in several investigations conducted between 1963 and 1990 (3260). (2) Between 1990 and 2000, additional studies failed to confirm their presence in MSS (2021, 3414). (3) Several summaries of the attempts to confirm the findings of Van Duuren et al. have been published (172, 3260, 3265). In 2002, Rustemeier et al. (3370) did report the presence of dibenz[a,j]acridine in the
Table XVII.E-1 Dibenz[a,h]acridine {I}, Dibenz[a,j]acridine {II}, and 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III} in Nicotine Pyrolysates (Pyr) and Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Condensate (CSC) Dibenz[a,h]acridine
Dibenz[a,j]acridine
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole
Investigators
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Van Duuren et al. (4027) Candeli et al. (587); Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Kaburaki et al. (2006) Schmeltz et al. (3499) Schmeltz et al. (3512) Snook (3733) Snook et al. (3750) Grimmer et al. (1409) Kamata et al. (2021) Sasaki and Moldoveanu (3414) Rustemeier et al. (3370)
yes NE
yes no
Yes NE
yes yes
no NE
yes NE
no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
NE NE no no no no no no no
No No No NE NE NE NE NE NE
NE NE no no no no no no yes
NE no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
NE NE no no no no NE NE NE
yes = Compound identified. no = Compound not found or identified. NE = Substrate not examined for compound in question. Examination of these results indicates that Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported the identification of the three N-heterocyclic compounds {I, II, and III} in MSS CSC and two of them {I and II} in a nicotine pyrolysate; whereas, Candeli et al. (587) failed to identify I but did identify {II} in MSS CSC. The 1963 Candeli et al. findings on {II} in MSS CSC were not confirmed in 1979 by investigators (3512) from the same laboratory: Hoffmann participated in both the 1963 and 1979 studies. Two studies (3499, 3512) confirmed the 1960 report by Van Duuren et al. that 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III} was not present in a nicotine pyrolysate.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 811
11/24/08 12:28:45 PM
812
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
MSSs from several ingredient-treated cigarettes. All yields were reported as less than 2.72 ng/cigarette. It might have been appropriate, in view of the numerous failures to confirm the presence of dibenz[a,j]acridine in cigarette smoke, for Rustemeier et al. to have provided more meaningful information on its presence. Other tumorigens in cigarette MSS, including several whose presence was and is suspect, have been listed since the early 1960s. In 1960, Mold et al. (2592) reported the isolation and identification of the tricyclic N-heterocyclic 5H,10Hdipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) {V} (Figure XVII.E-3) from CSC and demonstrated its relationship to its precursor in tobacco, the amino acid proline. Obviously, pyrocoll is not an aza-arene but an amide. Rodgman and Cook (3279) reported the identification of indole, carbazole, and several alkylated indoles and carbazoles in CSC and confirmed the presence of 5H,10Hdipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) {V} described previously by Mold et al. (2592). Rodgman and Cook also assessed previously reported biological studies on indole, 3-methylindole (skatole), and carbazole: None was reported to be tumorigenic in laboratory animals [Hartwell (1544), Shubik and Hartwell (3664)]. Poindexter and Carpenter (2972) identified 9H-pyrido[3, 4-b]indole (norharman) {VI} and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3, 4-b]indole (harman) {VII} (Figure XVII.E-3) isolated from CSC. They reported the yield of the total harmans in burley and flue-cured smokes to be between 15 and 20 mg/g of tobacco smoked, values 40 to 50 times that of the total harmans in the unsmoked tobaccos. Since the weight of tobacco in cigarettes sold at that time approximated 1 g, the delivery of these two compounds was about 15 to 20 mg/cigarette. They concluded from experiments with radiolabeled tryptophan that the harmans (found to be radiolabeled in the smoke) were generated pyrogenetically from a reaction between aldehydes (formaldehyde for norharman, acetaldehyde for harman) and the tryptophan in tobacco. Schmeltz et al. (3505) reported 5H,10Hdipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) {V}, 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) {VI}, and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) {VII} in tobacco smoke. Testa and Testa (3886, 3887) also confirmed the presence of 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) in CSC.
O N N O V
N
N
N H
N H
VI
VII
CH3
Figure XVII.E-3 Some amino acid-derived N-heterocyclics identified in tobacco smoke.
In 1964, the Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999) briefly discussed only four fused-ring N-heterocyclic compounds in tobacco smoke: quinoline plus the two dibenzacridines (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j] acridine) and the dibenzocarbazole (7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027). In his 1968 review of tobacco and tobacco smoke composition, Stedman (3797) discussed the identification of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic compounds [dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole] reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027), as well as the identification of the following N-heterocyclic compounds: 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b] indole (norharman), 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), and 9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole. In his early 1970s outline of recent research on tobacco and tobacco smoke composition, Wakeham (4103) noted the reported presence of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) in cigarette smoke and discussed their possible formation by reaction of tryptophan and an aldehyde. As noted by Rodgman (3253a), the structure of the aldehyde reacting with tryptophan ultimately dictates the structure of alkylated norharmans found in CSC (see Table XVII.E-2). In addition to 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5, 10-dione (pyrocoll), Izard et al. (1899) reported the identification of its homolog methyl-5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] pyrazine-5,10-dione (methylpyrocoll) in CSC. During a presentation at the 1975 TCRC and in a 1977 publication on their study of the water-soluble portion of CSC, Schumacher et al. (3553) reported the identifications of 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), 5H,10Hdipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), octahydro-5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (octahydropyrocoll), and 2-ethyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole. The results of research in Japan in the late 1970s brought attention not to any aza-arenes themselves but to a group of their amine derivatives, many of which showed inordinately high mutagenicity in the Ames test with several strains of Salmonella typhimurium. The source originally studied was cooked foodstuffs and pyrolysis products from several amino acids, which resulted in their being described as “cooked food” mutagens. Later, they became known as the N-heterocyclic amines. When the N-heterocyclic amines were shown to be tumorigenic in addition to being highly mutagenic and subsequently identified in tobacco smoke, they were included by Hoffmann and his colleagues in their numerous lists of tobacco smoke tumorigens published in 1997 and later (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744). The N-heterocyclic amines had not been included in their numerous lists published between 1986 and 1997 (1727, 1773, 1806) nor in similar lists by IARC (1870) and OSHA (2825). Even though their number in tobacco smoke is low, we decided to discuss them in a separate section that follows this one on aza-arenes. In the 1979 Surgeon General’s report (4005), the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole, quinoline, and alkylated quinolines in CSC were
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 812
11/24/08 12:28:46 PM
813
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.E-2 Chronology of Selected Aza-Arenes: Dibenz[a,h]acridine, Dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, Quinoline Year
Event
1929
Gabelya and Kipriyanov (1263) reported the identification of quinoline in a destructive distillate from tobacco. Destructive distillation of tobacco is not considered to be equivalent to the tobacco smoking process [see comments by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332)].
1935
Barry et al. (194) (members of the Kennaway group in the United Kingdom) compared the tumorigenicity of dibenz[a,h] anthracene (DB[a,h]A) with that of heterocyclic compounds in which one or both of the meso-carbons were replaced by nitrogen. The aza-arene dibenz[a,h]acridine was found to be less tumorigenic (mouse skin) than its PAH counterpart DB[a,h]A. They also reported that the tumorigenicity of dibenz[a,j]acridine was less than that of dibenz[c,h]acridine.
1937
In the first reported investigation of the tumorigenicity of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, Boyland and Brues (421a) reported that mice skin painted with it developed carcinomas at the painting site.
1937
Bachmann et al. (137a) reported that dibenz[a,j]acridine injected subcutaneously induced sarcomas in mice, i.e., dibenz[a,j] acridine was sarcogenic. Its sarcogenicity was relatively weak compared to that noted for similarly injected PAHs.
1940
Badger et al. (140) reported that oral administration to 10 mice of 5 mg/week/mouse of dibenz[a,h]acridine resulted in one mouse with an epithelioma and papilloma of the forestomach; another mouse showed stomach papillomas. Duration of the experiment was 627 days. Similar administration of dibenz[a,j]acridine (10 mice, 5 mg/week/mouse) gave no tumors in 572 days. In their introduction, the authors stated: There is now little doubt that cigarette smoking is the major factor concerned with the ever-increasing incidence of bronchogenic carcinoma in men. Both cigarette-tobacco tars and particulates from air pollution contain various carcinogenic polynuclear compounds.
1940
In their study of the response of the lungs of strain Aa mice to various compounds, Andervont and Shimkin (79) demonstrated that 20 of 20 strain A mice given a single injection of 0.5 mg of dibenz[a,h]acridine in 0.1 ml of tricaprylin developed multiple adenomas in 14 weeks but no sarcomas at the injection site. All 14 mice administered a single injection of 1 mg of dibenz[a,h]acridine in 0.3 ml of sesame oil developed multiple adenomas in 40 weeks but no sarcomas at injection site. Andervont and Shimkin also compared the response of the lungs of strain A mice to a single intravenous injection of 0.25 mg of each of nine compounds dispersed in 0.25 ml of water. Among the nine compounds were DB[a,h]A, B[a]P, benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A], dibenz[a,h]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole. A calculated “carcinogenic index” [% tumor bearing animals x mean number of adenomas in animals showing a positive response for each of these compounds at 8, 14, and 20 weeks] gave the following sequence: DB[a,h]A > 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole > B[a]P > dibenz[a,h]acridine > B[a]A a
The strain A mouse was developed for lung tumor research in laboratory animals. Without treatment of any kind, 70 to 90% of strain A mice develop adenomas, a type of lung tumor, between 12 and 18 months of age [Shimkin (3652)].
1946
Dubinin and Chelintsev (1075a) reported quinoline, isoquinoline, and several substituted pyridines in a pyrolysate of anabasine, a tobacco alkaloid structurally related to nicotine.
1951
Hartwell (1544) listed several studies in which dibenz[a,j]acridine and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole were reported to be tumorigenic in skin-painting (epitheliomas) and subcutaneous-injection (sarcomas) experiments.
1954
At the International Cancer Congress, São Paolo, a new short-term test was reported by Smith (3722a). By this test, the “tumorigenicity” of a test compound could be estimated in less than a week vs. the 18 to 20 months required in skin-painting studies. The extent and rapidity of the disappearance of the sebaceous glands after 4 daily applications of the test compound (PAHs, aza-arenes, etc.) were considered to be related to the tumorigenicity of the test compound. Because of the absence of the ultimate end point – a tumor, this test did not receive the endorsement originally anticipated.
1954
Kosak (2170) did not list quinoline as a tobacco smoke component, perhaps because it was reported as a component of a destructive distillate of tobacco rather than a component of tobacco smoke. However, he did list B[a]P as a questionable tobacco smoke component even though it too was identified in a destructive distillate of tobacco by Roffo (3323, 3325).
1956
Lacassagne et al. (2247a) reported the tumorigenicity of dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine to the skin and subcutaneous tissue of mice. The tumorigenicity of 76 other unsubstituted and substituted benzacridines was also cataloged. The authors noted: All [angular benzacridines] have a characteristic odor which is reminiscent of cigar smoke. Since 1967, two unsubstituted angular benzacridines (benz[a]acridine, benz[c]acridine) and over a dozen of their alkyl substituted derivatives have been identified in tobacco smoke (1409, 2021, 2120, 2132, 2596a, 3300, 3337, 3339, 3499, 3750, 3752).
1957
In the first supplement to Hartwell’s 1951 compilation of compounds tested for tumorigenicity, Shubik and Hartwell (3664) summarized the results of additional published studies on the tumorigenicity of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in mice and rats. (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 813
11/24/08 12:28:46 PM
814
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-2 (Continued) Chronology of Selected Aza-Arenes: Dibenz[a,h]acridine, Dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, Quinoline Year
Event
1959
Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) listed quinoline as a tobacco smoke component, but the reference cited was the report of Gabelya and Kipriyanov (1263) who identified quinoline in a destructive distillate of tobacco.
1960
Van Duuren et al. (4027) vacuum distilled a solution of the basic portion of 250 grams of cigarette “tar” at 100°C/0.5 mm pressure. The residue (10 g) was successively chromatographed on alumina and several Whatman’s papers. Bands corresponding to the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine were rechromatographed until their ultraviolet absorption and fluorescence spectra were identical with those of authentic samples. Chromatography of the neutral fraction of the CSC gave an isolate whose properties were identical with an authentic sample of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole. No 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole was detected. The estimated amounts of dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole isolated from the “tar” were 0. 1, 2.7, and 0.7 ng/cig, respectively. They estimated the levels of B[a]P and DB[a,h]A in the same CSC to be 5.0 and 0.5 ng/ciga, respectively. Van Duuren et al. noted: It is clear that the heterocyclics here described make a significant contribution to the reported carcinogenicity of tobacco tars. a It is interesting to note the deliveries recorded by Van Duuren et al. for B[a]P (5 ng/cig) and DB[a,h]A (0.5 ng/cig) and compare them to values subsequently listed by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) and Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) who listed a range for B[a]P of 20–40 ng/cig and a single value for DB[a,h]A of 4 ng/cig! Why did these authors not acknowledge the values reported by Van Duuren et al.?
1960
Van Duuren et al. (4027) also investigated the possibility that pyridine and nicotine were precursors of these nitrogen heterocyclics. Pyrolysis of pyridine or nicotine (750 °C, nitrogen atmosphere) yielded pyrolysates in which dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j] acridine were identified by the same procedures used with CSC. As in the CSC case, dibenz[a,j]acridine was more plentiful than dibenz[a,h]acridine in the pyridine and nicotine pyrolysates. No 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole was found in either pyrolysate.
1960
Van Duuren et al., citing unpublished data by Nelson et al. (2689d) on mouse skin-painting with the basic fraction of CSC, noted that the skin-painting experiments gave negative results and attributed this finding to the fact that: The basic fraction used in those experiments would not have been sufficient to yield skin tumors even if the benzacridines had been as potent for the skin as benzo[a]pyrene, which is not the case. They also noted that Wynder and Wright (4354) reported weak tumorigenicity with more concentrated fractions from the basic fraction.
1961/ 1962
Balasubrahmanyam and Quin (175) identified quinoline, isoquinoline, and various substituted pyridines in the pyrolysates from the tobacco alkaloids nornicotine and myosmine.
1962
Van Duuren (4022a) described methods for the separation and identification of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in cigarette MSS.
1962
Rodgman and Cook (3279) reported the isolation in crystalline form and the identification of a series of homologous indoles (indole, skatole, etc.) as well as several carbazoles from cigarette MSS. Candeli et al. (587) investigated the aza-arenes in CSC with the method described by Van Duuren et al. in 1960. It was noted:
1963
With some modifications, this method …by Candeli et al…enabled us to isolate from 100 cigarettes 1.0 mg [dibenz[a,j] acridine]. The presence of [dibenz[a,h]acridine] could not be confirmed. 1963
Wynder and Hoffmann (4317) described the results of mouse skin-painting tests with dibenz[a,j]acridine applied in 0.5 and 0.1% acetone solutions three times weekly to the backs of 20 Swiss female mice. After 12 to 14 months, tumors were induced in 16 (80%) and 15 (75%) mice, respectively, with 60% of the animals in each test developing carcinomas. Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) offered the following explanation for the difference between these extremely high results and the much lower one reported by LacassagnE et al. (2247a): This relatively high tumor response in mouse skin (compared to the findings of Lacassagne et al. (2247a)) might be partially explained by the high purity of the compounds, due mainly to the absence of the ‘Morgan’s base’ a dihydrodibenz[a,j]acridine. Only by repeated column chromatography on alumina can a [dibenz[a,j]acridine] be isolated that is free of the dihydro product (absence of N-H band in infrared absorption spectrum). In another study reported by Wynder and Hoffmann (4317), mouse skin was initiated with a single application of 300 mg of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene and then painted with a 0.5% solution of dibenz[a,j]acridine, three times weekly. The same tumor response was observed as with dibenz[a,j]acridine alone except that the tumors appeared 2 to 3 months earlier. The investigators interpreted this finding as indicating: There is no significant tumor-promoting activity of [dibenz[a,j]acridine], despite its strong hyperplastic effect.”
1964
The report of the 1964 Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999) identified dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j] acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole as carcinogenic polycyclic compounds isolated from cigarette smoke, classified them as weakly carcinogenic, and listed their amounts in cigarette MSS as 0.1, 2.7, and 0.7 ng/cig. The report also listed quinoline as a tobacco smoke component.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 814
11/24/08 12:28:46 PM
815
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.E-2 (Continued) Chronology of Selected Aza-Arenes: Dibenz[a,h]acridine, Dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, Quinoline Year 1964
1964
Event
In addition to discussing the dibenzacridines and dibenzocarbazole in tobacco smoke and the two dibenzacridines in a nicotine pyrolysate reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319) discussed the identification by Jarboe and Rosene (1923a) of quinoline in a nicotine pyrolysate produced at 600–900°C in an inert atmosphere. Kuhn (2228) reviewed the pyrogenesis of aza-arenes from tobacco and nicotine. The dibenzacridines were tabulated with reference to the 1960 paper of Van Duuren et al. (4027). He listed quinoline as a pyrolysis product of nicotine and nornicotine but not as a tobacco smoke component.
1964
Testa and Testa (3886) report quinoline as a tobacco smoke component. Its presence was subsequently confirmed by Grob and Völlmin (1427) and Kaburaki et al. (1992a).
1965
Sawicki et al. (3419a) identified dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine in polluted air in the amounts of 80 and 40 ng/1000 m3 of air, respectively.
1968
Stedman (3767) wrote: The presence of the dibenzacridines and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in cigarette smoke…is of special interest since these compounds are carcinogenic and may contribute to the weak tumorigenic activity of the basic fraction in laboratory animals [Wynder and Wright (4354); Wynder and Hoffmann (4319)]. NOTE: Stedman apparently missed the point that 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, because of its structure, was not present in the basic fraction but was found in the neutral fraction of CSC [see Van Duuren et al. (4027)].
1969 1970
Rothwell and Whitehead (3339) improved the method of isolation of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole from complex mixtures such as CSC by formation of complexes of the aza-arenes and PAHs with purines. In a study of the composition of nicotine pyrolysates (400°, 500°, 550°, 600°, 650°, 700°, 800°C; nitrogen and air atmospheres), Kaburaki et al. (2006) were unable to confirm the presence of the aza-arenes (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine) reported by Van Duuren et al. in 1960 for nicotine pyrolysis (750°C, nitrogen atmosphere). Because there is sufficient overlap between the pyrolysis conditions used by Kaburaki et al. and by Van Duuren et al., the profound difference in composition results (presence vs. absence of the aza-arenes in question) cannot be explained by minor differences in pyrolysis conditions. In addition, the tumorigenicity of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole was compared with that of B[a]P: Weekly administration of 3 mg of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole for 15 weeks resulted in 13% more animals dying with respiratory tract cancer than died with same dose level of B[a]P. With lower total dose levels (15 mg) of B[a]P only, 30% of the animals developed respiratory tract tumors vs. 89% of the animals treated with the same dose of 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole. The tumors in the 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole group appeared earlier than those in the B[a]P-treated group.
1972
Schmeltz et al. (3499) studied the pyrolysis (800-860 °C, nitrogen atmosphere) of nitrogen-containing materials (tobacco, tobacco pigment, nicotine) and reported: We could not detect benzo(a)pyrene in nicotine pyrolyzates, nor could we confirm the presence of the physiologically active dibenzacridines and dibenzcarbazole reported in tobacco smoke and in nicotine and pyridine pyrolyzates by Van Duuren… Here again, the slight difference in the temperature (750°C vs. 800–860°C) of the inert atmosphere (nitrogen) pyrolysis cannot explain the profound difference in the compositional findings (presence vs. absence of the aza-arenes in question).
1973
The IARC Working Group reported that skin painting with dibenz[a,h]acridine induced skin tumors in mice (1864a). Subcutaneous injection into mice produced sarcoma at the injection site plus an increased incidence of pulmonary adenomas. In 1973, dibenz[a,h]acridine had not been tested by other administration routes or in other species. The IARC noted that no human data were available, but it did note: Coal tar and other materials which are known to be carcinogenic to man may contain [dibenz[a,h]acridine]. The IARC concluded that dibenz[a,j]acridine induced skin tumors in mice following topical application. At the highest dose tested by subcutaneous injection, it induced sarcomas at the injection site and an increased incidence of pulmonary adenomas. Negative results were obtained by the oral route in the mouse, but the test was considered inadequate because of the small number of animals tested. Dibenz[a,j]acridine had not been tested in other species at that time. No human data were available, but the IARC considered that some materials known to be carcinogenic to man may contain dibenz[a,j]acridine.
1973
The IARC Working Group considered 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole to be: Carcinogenic in the mouse, rat, hamster, and possibly in the dog. It has both a local and a systemic carcinogenic effect. Following oral administration in the mouse, forestomach tumors and hepatomas occurred; intratracheal administration to hamsters produced tumors of the respiratory tract. In comparison with benzo[a]pyrene, [7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole] appears to be a stronger respiratory tract carcinogen for the hamster. (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 815
11/24/08 12:28:47 PM
816
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-2 (Continued) Chronology of Selected Aza-Arenes: Dibenz[a,h]acridine, Dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, Quinoline Year
1976
1976
Event
Though 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole had been reported as a component of CSC, no case reports or epidemiological data concerning human exposure were available. In his review on polycyclic tumorigens, Dipple (983) labeled dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole as “carcinogenic heterocyclic compounds” with “slight” activity. However, in a later review in 1984, Dipple et al. (984) revised the assessment of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, listing it as a highly potent tumorigen. Wynder and Hoffmann (4347) listed dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole as: Tumorigenic agents identified in the particulate phase of tobacco smoke, each possessing low biological activity and only traces detected in the smoke of 100 cigarettes. Dibenz[a,j]acridine was detected in amounts of 1.0 microgram per 100 cigarettes [10 ng/cig]. They categorized dibenz[a,j]acridine and dibenz[a,h]acridine as “known animal carcinogens,” but noted that these aza-heterocyclic compounds are “minor carcinogens” in tobacco smoke.
1976
Hoffmann et al. (1780) reported that the basic fraction of CSC which contains dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine was not tumorigenic to mouse skin, cf. Wynder and Wright (1957), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332).
1977
Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491), in their review of N-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke discussed the benzacridines: Nicotine has…been shown to produce on pyrolysis the animal carcinogens, dibenz[a,h]acridine…and dibenz[a,j]acridine…both of which are present in tobacco smoke…Acridans have been reported in smoke… Subsequent dehydrogenation of the acridans could lead to acridines. The only examples of the latter reported in smoke are two benzacridines [dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j] acridine]; these have been shown to form during pyrolysis from nicotine… A dibenzocarbazole [7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole]…has also been reported in tobacco smoke… The last three fused ring compounds cited are tumorigenic in the experimental animal. Schmeltz and Hoffmann listed quinoline as both a tobacco and a tobacco smoke component as well as an “animal carcinogen (rat liver).”
1979
In a brief section of the chapter on cigarette smoke composition, the aza-arenes (including dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole), their tumorigenicity, and their mutagenicity were discussed in the 1979 Surgeon General’s report (4005). The report noted: Mutagens thus far identified in cigarette smoke are: Quinoline (MS 1.7 mg/cigarette; SS 18 mg/cigarette), all seven isomeric methylquinolines MS (0.7 mg/cigarette; SS 8 mg/cigarette)… Quinoline induces hepatomas when fed in high doses to rats…
1979
Rinkus and Legator (3157) reported dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine to be mutagenic substances in the Ames Salmonella typhimurium test.
1979
Schmeltz et al. (3512) studied the fate of radiolabeled nicotine during pyrolysis and during actual smoking in a burning cigarette spiked with radiolabeled nicotine. The radiolabeled nicotine was pyrolyzed (nitrogen atmosphere) from a silica gel matrix at several temperatures (600°C, 750°C, and 900°C) and from a tobacco matrix at 600 °C. None of three aza-arenes – dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole – identified by Van Duuren et al. (4027) in CSC was found in the smoke study by Schmeltz et al. Neither of the two dibenzacridines reported by Van Duuren et al. in a nicotine pyrolysate was found in the several nicotine pyrolysates generated by Schmeltz et al. (3512). The differences concerning the presence or absence of these aza-arenes in several such studies involving CSCs and/or nicotine pyrolysates were summarized by Rodgman (3255, 3257).
1982
In the 1982 Surgeon General’s report (4010), the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole were described as “tumor-initiating agents in the particulate phase of tobacco smoke” and their MSS levels as 0.1, 3 to 10, and 0.7 ng/cig, respectively. It was noted, from data provided by Hoffmann et al. (1781, 1782), that dibenz[a,j]acridine possessed much higher tumorigenic activity than dibenz[a,h]acridine and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, cf. Dipple et al. (983).
1982
Adams et al. (35) reported the identification and quantitation of quinoline (0.2 to 1.3 mg/cig), isoquinoline (0.1 to 0.9 mg/cig), and the seven isomeric methylquinolines (0.5 to 2.5 mg/cig) in the MSS of several commercial cigarettes. They noted: Quinoline is the most abundant aza-arene in [mainstream] cigarette smoke.
1984
In their review of polycyclic aromatic tumorigens, Dipple et al. (983) classified dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine as possessing only Slight tumorigenicity. They classified 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole as possessing High tumorigenicity (same category as 1,2-dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene (cholanthrene), 3-methyl-1,2-dihydrobenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene), 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, and B[a]P).
1984
In their review of tumorigenic aromatic amines in which fused ring polycyclic amines are discussed, Garner et al. (1275a) neither mention nor list quinoline as a tumorigenic compound
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 816
11/24/08 12:28:47 PM
817
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.E-2 (Continued) Chronology of Selected Aza-Arenes: Dibenz[a,h]acridine, Dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, Quinoline Year
Event
1985/86 The IARC (1870) in its 1986 report on its 1985 deliberations found sufficient evidence to classify dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j] acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole as carcinogenic in laboratory animals. The IARC noted that “nicotine is a specific precursor for the two acridines”, totaling ignoring contradictory evidence from several groups of investigators who were unable to confirm the presence of these dibenzacridines in nicotine pyrolysates. The IARC listed quinoline as a smoke component but did not include it in its tabulation of compounds vs. “the degree of evidence [for carcinogenicity] in animals (and humans). ” 1986 Hoffmann and Wynder (1808) published a list of components classified as toxicants and/or tumorigens in tobacco and smoke. Much of the information in their report on quinoline, dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole had been provided to the IARC for inclusion in its 1986 article (1870). 1990 Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), in their compilation of 43 “tumorigenic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke”, listed dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, and quinoline as tumorigenic aza-arenes in CSC. This list was subsequently used by the EPA (1990) in its attempt to have environmental tobacco smoke classified as a Group A (human) carcinogen. Hoffmann and Hecht paid little attention to the discrepancies between the 1960 report of Van Duuren et al. on the presence of these aza-arenes in CSC and nicotine pyrolysates and later reports from other investigators who failed to confirm the Van Duuren findings on these compounds either in CSC or nicotine pyrolysates [see Table XVII.E-1)]. In their tabulation, Hoffmann and Hecht listed quinoline with no comment as to its carcinogenicity as reported in the “IARC evaluation of evidence of carcinogenicity in laboratory animals [and] in humans.” In their text, they noted: Quinoline, a liver carcinogen in rats…and in newborn mice…, is present in cigarette smoke at a concentration of 1-2 mg/ cigarette [Dong et al. (1042)]. 1991
1994
1994
1997
1998
2000 2001
In a memorandum to the EPA, Rodgman (3255) summarized the inconsistencies between the 1960 findings reported by Van Duuren et al. on dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in nicotine pyrolysates and/or mainstream CSC vs. the findings in the comparable 1963 study of Candeli et al. [reported by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332)], the 1970 study of Kaburaki et al. (2006), the 1972 and 1979 studies of Schmeltz et al .(3499, 3512), and the 1986 and 1987 reports by Grimmer et al. (1409). The expanded summary is shown in Table XVII.E-1. Summaries of the studies of benzacridines in cigarette smoke by Kamata et al. (2021) and Sasaki and Moldoveanu (3414) were added. A possible explanation of the differences in the results concerning the presence or absence of these three aza-arenes in mainstream CSC may be the differences between cigarettes fabricated in 1960 and those fabricated more recently after the 1970s. The pre-1960 cigarettes were substantially higher in nicotine. However, there does not appear to be a logical explanation for the difference in the results (presence vs. absence) of these three compounds in nicotine pyrolysates prepared in 1960, 1963, 1970, 1972, and 1979. Post-1960 advances in analytical technology should have improved the ability to isolate/identify low levels of these three aza-arenes. Osha (2825), in its goals for clean air legislation, presented its own list of 43 tobacco smoke components tumorigenic in animals or man. Its list differed slightly from that of Hoffmann and Hecht (1727). OSHA included the three aza-arenes reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027) but omitted quinoline. In a response to the OSHA (2825) publication, Rodgman (3257) presented the information in Table XVII.E-1 as reasons why the benzacridines and the benzocarbazole should be removed from the list. Valid scientific reasons for deleting other listed components were also presented. Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) revised the 1990 Hoffmann-Hecht list of “43 tumorigenic components” of tobacco smoke (1727), expanding the list to 60 components by deleting chrysene and crotonaldehyde in agreement with the OSHA (2825) list and by adding 19 other components, including the 8 N-heterocyclic amines known as the “cooked food” mutagens. Still retained in the HoffmannHoffmann 1997 list were the aza-arenes quinoline, dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole. In a letter to the Editors of Beiträge Tabakforschung zur International, Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741) submitted a list of biologically active components of cigarette MSS, including the four aza-arenes quinoline, dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole. Fowles and Bates (1217) included dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in their list of tobacco and tobacco smoke toxicants. Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743) in their list of tobacco and tobacco smoke toxicants again included dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j] acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole despite the numerous reports of research that failed to confirm the 1960 Van Duuren et al. reported finding. Hoffmann et al. (1744) again included dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in their list of tobacco and tobacco smoke toxicants.
2003
Rodgman (3265) assessed the various published reports in which numerous tobacco and tobacco smoke components were classified as toxicants (1217, 1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808, 2825). The numerous deficiencies and errors in the reports were cataloged.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 817
11/24/08 12:28:47 PM
818
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
made the following interesting observation, pertinent to the alleged “carcinogenicity” of benzene, frequently used as a solvent in tumorigenicity studies in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s: “These molecules [the angular benzacridines] are very soluble in benzene and acetone (two solvents currently used for the investigations of carcinogenic activity).” In addition to the exposure to acridines and benzacridines in tobacco smoke, other exposures to various acridines and benzacridines have been cataloged in the scientific literature. Many of the sources (Table XVII.E-5) comprise environmental pollutants. Unlike the PAHs and the N-nitrosamines, nontobacco smoke exposure to the acridines/benzacridines does not include foods. However, exposures other than tobacco smoke to polycyclic nitrogen compounds include exposures to the N-heterocyclic amines, the so-called “cooked food” mutagens, in a variety of foods. Table XVII.E-6 lists, with appropriate citations, the azaarenes reported in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Table XVII.E-7 summarizes the variation in the structures of the aza-arene compounds identified in tobacco and/ or tobacco smoke. Of particular interest with regard to the 294 aza-arenes cataloged in Table XVII.E-6 is that only twenty-three of the 294 have been identified as tobacco components. Of the twenty-three, just fifteen have been identified in both tobacco and smoke. The number of azaarenes identified in smoke is 286. Those isolated from or identified in tobacco in greater than trace amounts include 1H-indole, 2,3-dihydro-1H-indole, 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman), 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), 1H-purine, and quinoline. Because of their classification as significant tumorigens in tobacco smoke (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744) and their inordinately high mutagenicity in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium (2327c, 3828c), the amino derivatives of several
discussed but not the presence or biological properties of any of the “cooked food” mutagens identified in tobacco smoke. In the 1982 report of the Surgeon General [see Table 10, p. 214 in (4010)], 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) were classified as “toxic and tumorigenic agents of cigarette smoke” in amounts of 3.2 to 8.1 mg/cigarette and 1.1 to 3.1 mg/cigarette, respectively, in mainstream CSC. None of the other highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic amine mutagens present in tobacco smoke was discussed. Table XVII.E-2 lists, with appropriate citations, the chronology of the studies pertinent to the aza-arenes and other polycyclic nitrogen compounds in tobacco smoke. A similar chronology of studies pertinent to the N-heterocyclic amines, the “cooked food” mutagens, is presented in a subsequent section.
XVII.E.1
Alternate Exposures to Aza-Arenes
In the several lists of tumorigenic components in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke, three N-heterocyclic compounds (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) appear on the list of forty-three by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) and OSHA (2825) and the list of sixty by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740). Quinoline was on several lists but was omitted from the OSHA list (Table XVII.E-3). Table XVII.E-4 lists the many tobacco smoke components similar in structure to those listed in Table XVII.E-3. Even though, as indicated in Table XVII.E-1 and the text accompanying it, the presence of the three pentacyclic N-heterocyclic compounds in tobacco smoke is equivocal, the alternate exposure to them and similar components is discussed below. In their 1956 review of angular benzacridines and dibenzacridines and their tumorigenicity, Lacassagne et al. (2247a)
Table XVII.E-3 Summary of Lists of Tumorigenic Aza-Arenes in Tobacco Smoke IARC Evaluationd of Evidence re Tumorigenicity in Component Quinoline Dibenz[a,h]acridine Dibenz[a,j]acridine 7H-Dibenzo[c,g] carbazole
Ho & Hea
OSHAb
Ho & Hoc
MS Level Wt/cigc
Laboratory Animals
Humans
× × × ×
…
× × × ×
1–2 mg 0.1 ng 3–10 ng 0.7 ng
… sufficient sufficient sufficient
… … … …
× × ×
Ho & He = Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) OSHA = OSHA (2825) c Ho & Ho = Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) d See IARC (1870) a
b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 818
11/24/08 12:28:47 PM
819
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.E-4 Tobacco Smoke Components Related to Aza-Arenes in Tumorigen Listsa Quinolines [35]b
Acridines [28]b
Quinoline Quinoline, 5-aminoQuinoline, butylQuinoline, dihydroQuinoline, dihydroethyl(3 isomers) Quinoline, dihydromethyl(3 isomers) Quinoline, dimethyl-(5 isomers) Quinoline, ethyl-(2 isomers) Quinoline, methyl-(6 isomers) Quinoline, (1-methylethyl)Quinoline, methyltetrahydro(2 isomers) Quinoline, propylQuinoline, tetrahydro-(2 isomers) Quinoline, tetramethyl-
Acridine Acridine, 9,10-dihydroAcridine, 9,10-dihydro(4 homologs) Acridine, ethylAcridine, methylAcridine, propyl-
Carbazoles [20]b 9H-Carbazole 9H-Carbazole, 2-amino9H-Carbazole, dimethyl(4 isomers) 9H-Carbazole, 9-ethyl9H-Carbazole, methyl(5 isomers) 9H-Carbazole, tetramethyl9H-Carbazole, trimethyl-
Benz[a]acridine Benz[a]acridine, dimethyl-
11H-Benzo[a]carbazole
Benz[c]acridine
5H-Benzo[b]carbazole
Benz[c]acridine, dimethyl(5 isomers) Benz[c]acridine, methyl(5 isomers) Benz[c]acridine, trimethyl(2 isomers)
Quinoline, trimethyl-
7H-Benzo[c]carbazole
1H-Dibenzo[a,c]carbazole Dibenz[a,h]acridine
Quinolinecarbonitrile (2 isomers)
13H-Dibenzo[a,i]carbazole Dibenz[a,i]acridine
8-Quinolinol 8-Quinolinol, 7-methyla b
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole Dibenz[a,j]acridine Dibenz[c,h]acridine
Omitted from the list are the N-heterocyclic amines discussed in a subsequent chapter. Number in square bracket = number of reported components
Table XVII.E-5 Aza-Arene Sources Other than Tobacco Smoke Acridine/Benzacridine Source Automobile exhaust Coal-fired residential furnace emission Coal distillate Coal tar Crude oil High boiling petroleum distillate Industrial stack effluent Urban suspended particulate matter Cigarette smoke condensate
Reference 3419b, 4247a 1407b 1334c, 2210a 2261a, 2534a 1407a, 3519c 2519a 3419a 35, 636a, 1040a, 3419c 1884, 3491
aza-arenes are discussed in detail in Section XVII.F devoted to the N-heterocylic amines identified in tobacco smoke. However, in addition to the N-heterocylic amines, several azaarene-related fused N-containing ring compounds with two or more ring nitrogens plus various functional groups have been identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Classic examples of such compounds in tobacco include adenosine, 5’-adenylic acid, and many purines. Table XVII.E-8 lists many such components identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Examination of the structures of the various derivatives indicates the inclusion of a variety of functional groups, for example, amino, carboxylic acid, carboxamide, hydroxyl, and various carbohydrates. It should be noted that Table XVII.E-8 does not include the nine N-heterocyclic amines because they are described and discussed in detail in Section XVII.F. In contrast to the azaarenes which occur predominately in tobacco smoke, fifty-five of the seventy-six components with functional groups listed in Table XVII.E-8 were identified in tobacco and only twentyfour were identified in tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 819
11/24/08 12:28:48 PM
820
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 820
11/24/08 12:28:51 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
821
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 821
11/24/08 12:28:56 PM
822
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 822
11/24/08 12:28:57 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
823
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 823
11/24/08 12:28:58 PM
824
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 824
11/24/08 12:28:59 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
825
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 825
11/24/08 12:29:00 PM
826
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 826
11/24/08 12:29:01 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
827
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 827
11/24/08 12:29:02 PM
828
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 828
11/24/08 12:29:03 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
829
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 829
11/24/08 12:29:04 PM
830
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 830
11/24/08 12:29:05 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
831
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 831
11/24/08 12:29:06 PM
832
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 832
11/24/08 12:29:07 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
833
Table XVII.E-6 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 833
11/24/08 12:29:08 PM
834
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-7 Structures of Aza-Arenes in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Identified in Smoke
Present in Tobacco
No. of Nitrogens
No. of Nitrogens
Ring Type
1
2
3
Total
1
2
4
Total
Bicyclic Tricyclic Tetracyclic Pentacyclic Hexacyclic
107 43 30 10 0
63 28 0 0 1
3 0 0 0 0
173 71 30 10 1
14 2 0 0 0
4 2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
19 4 0 0 0
Total
190
92
3
285
16
6
1
23
XVII.F N-Heterocyclic Amines Although not originally classified at the time as “cooked food” mutagens, several amino acid-derived N-heterocyclic compounds were identified in cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) in the early 1960s: 5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) {I} by Mold et al. (2592) and 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) {II} and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b ]indole (harman) {III} by Poindexter and Carpenter (2972) (Figure XVII.F-1). Proline is the precursor in tobacco of 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) {I} in tobacco smoke. Tryptophan is the major precursor in tobacco of 1-methyl-
9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) {II} and 9H-pyrido[3,4-b] indole (norharman) {III} as well as indole and its alkylated homologs in tobacco smoke. In the late 1970s, Japanese investigators, in their detailed studies of components of various “cooked foods,” isolated and identified the first of a series of N-heterocyclic amines as pyrolysis products of several amino acids. Sugimura et al. (3829) reported the isolation and identification of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (designated as Trp-P-1) {IV} and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (Trp-P-2) {V} (Figure XVII.F-2) from tryptophan pyrolysates.
O N
N
N O I 5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1',2'd]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll)
N
N H
N H
II 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b] indole (norharman)
III 1-Methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman)
CH3
Figure XVII.F-1 Pyrocoll, norharman, and harman.
R1 N
N N H
R2 IV R1 = R2 = CH3 V R1 = CH3 R2 = H
N
NH2 R1
NH2
N
VI R1 = CH3 VII R1 = H
NH2
R1
N H
N
VIII R1 = H IX R1 = CH3
N NH2 N
N
R1
R2
X R1 = CH3 R2 = H XI R1 = R2 = CH3
Figure XVII.F-2 N-Heterocyclic amines, the “cooked food” mutagens.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 834
11/24/08 12:29:09 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
835
Table XVII.E-8 Derivatives of Fused N-Containing-Ring Compounds with Two or More Nitrogens in the Rings
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 835
11/24/08 12:29:10 PM
836
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-8 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 836
11/24/08 12:29:11 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
837
Table XVII.E-8 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 837
11/24/08 12:29:12 PM
838
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-8 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 838
11/24/08 12:29:13 PM
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
839
Table XVII.E-8 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 839
11/24/08 12:29:14 PM
840
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.E-8 (Continued) Aza-Arenes and Other Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Yamamoto et al. (4365a) reported the isolation and identification of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines 2-amino6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) {VI} and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) {VII} from glutamic acid pyrolysates. Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) and Matsumoto et al. (2492) reported the identification of 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) {VIII} and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) {XIII-IX} in CSC (Figure XVII.F-2).
A unique feature of several of compounds {IV–VII} was their inordinately high mutagenicity in the Ames system (Salmonella typhimurium). Mutagenic activities on a revertant per microgram basis as determined in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98 and TA 100 for several of these compounds are shown in Table XVII.F-1 [Sugimura (3828c), Lee et al. (2327c)]. To put in perspective the extremely high values for the mutagenic activities listed in Table XVII.F-1, it should be noted that the mutagenic activity
Table XVII.F-1 Mutagenic Activities of N-Heterocyclic Amines Towards Salmonella typhimuriuma
Compound Dipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole, 2-amino-6-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole, 2-amino5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1-methyl9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino-3-methylImidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, 2-amino-3-methylImidazo[4,5-f]quinoline,2amino-3,4-dimethyl9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-methylCigarette smoke condensate Benzo[a]pyrene
Mutagenic Activity, Revertant/μg
Identified in Tobacco Smoke
TA 98b
TA 100b
TA 98c
TA 100c
Glu-P-1
yes
49000
3200
73000
4000
Glu-P-2
yes
1900
1200
600
400
Trp-P-1
yes
39000
1700
20000
500
Trp-P-2
yes
104200
1800
103000
2000
AaC
yes
300
20
—
—
MeAaC
yes
200
120
—
—
IQ
yes
433000
7000
222000
11000
MeIQ
yes
661000
30000
1327000
70000
norharman harman
yes yes
— —
— —
— —
— —
CSC B[a]P
— yes
— —
— —
2 200
—
Abbreviation
1
Tests with Salmonella typhimurium involved use of S-9 mix. Ames test data with Salmonella typhimurium reported by Sugimura (3828c). c Ames test data with Salmonella typhimurium reported by Lee et al. (2327c). a
b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 840
11/24/08 12:29:15 PM
841
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) (strain TA 98) when tested under the same conditions is about 200 revertant/mg of B[a]P. In separate studies, Levitt et al. (2355a) and Nagao et al. (2667b) demonstrated the mutagenicity of the previously identified tobacco smoke components 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) {II} and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) {III}. Heckman and Best (1587) reported the identification of nearly 270 previously unidentified and confirmation of over 150 previously identified N-containing components in CSC. These included several components structurally similar to some of the N-heterocyclic amines 9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole, 2-pentyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 1-butyl-9H-pyrido [3,4-b]indole, 1-propenyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole, and a partially characterized norharman. In addition to their mutagenicity in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium), several of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines were subsequently reported to be tumorigenic, particularly in feeding experiments, to several laboratory animal species. The tumorigenicity in mice of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) was reported by Matsukura et al. (2491a) and in rats by Hosaka et al. (1835a). Takayama et al. (3862d) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 3-amino1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1 -methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). Ohgaki et al. (2849b) described the tumorigenicity in mice and Takayama et al. (3862b) described the tumorigenicity in rats of 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2). 2-Amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) {X} was reported to be tumorigenic in rats by Takayama et al. (3862c) and Tanaka et al. (3865c) and in mice by Ohgaki et al. (2849, 2849a). Ohgaki et al. (2849, 2849a) also reported the tumorigenicity in mice of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and
2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), both compounds being components in broiled fish, fried beef, and beef extract. As indicated in Table XVII.F-1, both 2-amino-3 -methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) (4367, 4368) and 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ) (2039) have been reported in tobacco smoke. Rodgman (3253a) discussed the theoretical relationships (Figures XVII.F-3 and XVII.F-4) among glutamic acid {XII}, its possible degradation products 4-aminobutanoic {XIII} and 2-aminobutanoic acid {XIV}, 2-amino-3-methylpyridine {XV} and 2-amino-6-methylpyridine {XVI}, 2-aminopyridine {XVII} and the possible reactions between these substituted aminopyridines to form 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) {VI}, 2-aminodipyrido[1,2a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) {VII}, and two similar products, 2-amino-9-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole {XVII} and 2-amino-3,6-dimethyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole {XIX}, not yet identified in tobacco smoke or cooked foods. The aminobutanoic acids {XIII and XIV} and the aminopyridines {XV-XVII} noted in Figures XVII.F-3 and XVII.F-4 have been reported as tobacco smoke components. Rodgman also discussed the already identified and other possible theoretical relationships (Figure XVII.F-5) between tryptophan {XX} and 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) {II its methyl homolog 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) {III} and other substituted norharmans {VI, R = C2H5, CH3CH=CH, and n-C4H9}, the tryptophan pyrolysis products 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido-[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) {IV} and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (Trp-P-2) {V}; the alkyl- and dialkyl-indoles; indole3-acetonitrile ; the 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indoles [AaC {VIII} and MeAaC {IX}] plus other pyrido[2,3-a]indoles {R = H, CH3, C2H5, (CH3)2CHCH2, or n-C5H11} (see Table XVII.F-6). All of the compounds noted in (Figure XVII.F-4) have been reported as tobacco smoke components.
COOH
COOH NH2 COOH HOOC
H2N
NH2
XII
HOOC
XIII
XIV
NH2 CH3
XV
N
CH3 NH2
NH2
N
COOH
HOOC HOOC
COOH +
COOH NH2
N
XVII
NH2
NH2 XVI
Figure XVII.F-3 Theoretical conversion of glutamic acid {XII} to aminobutanoic acids {XIII, XIV} and aminopyridines {XV–XVII}.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 841
11/24/08 12:29:16 PM
842
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
N
N
NH2
CH3
XV
N
XVII
CH3 XVII
N
VI N
NH2
N XVII
VII CH3
CH3 N
XVI
N
N
XV
NH2
NH2
N N
XVII
N
XVIII N
NH2
N
+ NH2
CH3
N
+ NH2
NH2
N
+ NH2
NH2
N
+ NH2
N
N
CH3 XV
NH2
CH3 N
CH3 XIX
Figure XVII.F-4 Theoretical routes for conversion of glutamic acid-derived aminopyridines to possible tobacco smoke components.
In the 1979 report of the U.S. Surgeon General (4005), the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7Hdibenzo[c,g]carbazole, quinoline, and alkylated quinolines in CSC were discussed but not the presence or biological properties of the N-heterocyclic amines identified in tobacco smoke. However, in the 1982 report of the Surgeon General (4010), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) were classified as “toxic and tumorigenic agents of cigarette smoke” in amounts of 3.2 to 8.1 mg/cigarette and 1.1 to 3.1 mg/cigarette, respectively, in mainstream CSC. None of the N-heterocyclic amines present in tobacco smoke was discussed. Snook and Chortyk (3739, 3740) reported the cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) yield of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) to be 1.2 to 13.4 mg/cigarette; that for 1-methyl9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) to be 0.3 to 3.8 mg/cigarette. They found a linear relationship between the yield of MSS “tar” and the yields of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b ]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman). In contrast to the 1962 findings of Poindexter and Carpenter (2972),
Snook and Chortyk reported yields of these two compounds were not influenced by the tobacco type. In his review of the studies of the mutagenicity of CSC, DeMarini (933) discussed the significance of the findings of Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) and Matsumoto et al. (2492) on the mutagenicity of 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole (AaC) (80 ng/cigarette) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9Hpyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) (7 ng/cigarette). None of the authors contributing to the American Chemical Society’s 1984 monograph [Searle (3568)] on chemical carcinogens mentioned the N-heterocyclic amines as mutagens and/or tumorigens. Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368) identified and quantitated the following N-heterocyclic amines in mainstream CSC: 2amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) (0.3 ng/cigarette), 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) (0.3 ng/cigarette), 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) (0.2 ng/cigarette), 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) (16.9 ng/cigarette), and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido [2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) (1.6 ng/cigarette).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 842
11/24/08 12:29:16 PM
843
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
R
N N H VIII R = H IX R = CH3
R
COOH NH2
NH2
N H
XX
NH2
N H
R2
R-CHO COOH
N H
N
R
NH N H
R
CN
N H
R1 NH N H
R
N H
R2
NH N H
R
Figure XVII.F-5 Possible tryptophan-derived compounds in tobacco smoke.
In his 1986 review of the isolation and identification of the N-heterocyclic amines, the high mutagenicity in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium) of several of them, their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals, and their various sources, including CSC, Sugimura (3828c) wrote the following about their importance as human carcinogens: Taking various factors into consideration, it is probably impractical and not realistic to make risk estimations from the carcinogenicity data on rodents given a single carcinogen. However, for a simple extrapolation of animal data for risk estimation, TD50 values, which are the doses needed to develop cancers in 50% of animals fed on carcinogens [IQ, Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, AaC, and MeAaC] for their life time, have been calculated based on mouse experiments … If we assume the average TD50 value of heterocyclic amines should be about 8 mg/kg/day, we can roughly estimate the risk of these carcinogenic heterocyclic amines for human beings. The intake of heterocyclic amines was calculated from available data on their quantities in foods. Apparently the human intake is about 0.0002% times the TD50 obtained from animal data. This means that heterocyclic amines may not be so serious for human cancer development.
Sugimura added: On the other hand, it is also true that human beings are being exposed to many heterocyclic amines and many other carcinogens with tumor promoters and/or suppressing factors
for carcinogenesis. At this moment, it is honest to state that no solid information on the estimation of risk of heterocyclic amines has been obtained in any direction, either positive or negative. As in the case of the carcinogens whose activity can be substantially reduced by anticarcinogens [see review by Rodgman (3255)], Lee et al. (2327c) reported that mainstream CSC significantly inhibited the mutagenicity of several of these N-heterocyclic amines when tested in the Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium, strain TA 98 in the presence of the S-9 mix. The N-heterocyclic amines tested included 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), 2-amino-6-methyl-dipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2), 3-amino1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1), and 3-amino1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). The mutagenic activities of these mutagens were suppressed as much as 80% by addition of 50 to 100 mg of CSC per plate. Enzymatic studies indicate that CSC is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenase. Therefore, it appears that CSC exerts its antimutagenicity by inhibiting the P-450 system. Lee et al. (2327c) also reported that fractionation of CSC yields fractions that show low mutagenicity themselves but are significantly antimutagenic. Although many of the N-heterocyclic amines are indeed present in cigarette MSS, it should be remembered that the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 843
11/24/08 12:29:17 PM
844
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.F-2 Summary of Lists of Tumorigenic N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco Smoke Mainstream Smoke Yield (ng/cig) Reported by
Component
1986–1994 IARC (1870), Hoffmann & Wynder (1806), Hoffmann & Hecht (1727), Hoffmann et al. (1773), OSHA (2825)
1997 Hoffmann & Hoffmann (1740)
1998 Hoffmann & Hoffmann (1741)a
2001 Hoffmann & Hoffmann (1743) Hoffmann et al. (1744)
2001 Fowles & Bates (1217)
1997–2001 Smith et al. (3711–3713)
NL b NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
25–260 2–37 0.37–0.89 0.25–0.88 11–23 0.26 NL 0.29–0.48 0.82–1.1
25–260 2–37 0.37–0.89 0.25–0.88 11–23 0.3 NL 0.3–0.5 0.8–1.1
25–260 NL 0.37–0.89 0.25–0.88 11–23 0.3 NL 0.3–0.5 0.8–1.1
NL b NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
ND c–258 1.6–37 ND–0.89 0.25–0.88 ND–22.9 0.26–0.49 0.28–0.75 0.19–0.3 ND–0.2
AaC a MeAaC Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 PhIP IQ MeIQ Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2
AaC = 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; MeAaC = 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; Glu-P-1 = 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole; Glu-P-2 = 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole; PhIP = 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine; IQ = 2-amino-3-methyl3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; MeIQ = 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; Trp-P-1 = 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole; Trp-P-2 = 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole. b NL = not listed. c ND = not detected a
major part of the research on this class of compounds was initiated and extended because of their presence in a great number of cooked foodstuffs consumed by a great number of people. When the N-heterocyclic amines were shown to be tumorigenic in addition to being highly mutagenic and subsequently identified in tobacco smoke, they were included by Hoffmann and his colleagues in their numerous lists of tobacco smoke tumorigens published in 1997 and later (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744). The N-heterocyclic amines had not been included in their numerous lists published between 1986 and 1997 (1727, 1773, 1806) nor in similar lists published by IARC (1870) and OSHA (2825). Table XVII.F-2 summarizes some details of these N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke. Because of their concerns about the mutagenicity of numerous commonly consumed heated foods, many of the studies of the isolation, identification, and estimation of N-heterocyclic amines in heated foodstuffs or heated food components, particularly amine-containing components such as amino acids, proteins, and peptides, were conducted by Japanese investigators. This becomes obvious from examination of the authors and coauthors of the references listed in Table XVII.F-3. With the reporting of the Ames mutagenicity test with Salmonella typhimurium in the mid-1970s and the demonstration of its utility, the number of studies on potential mutagenic systems and the mutagenicity-tumorigenicity relationship virtually exploded. By highly competent application of up-to-date isolation and characterization techniques plus utilization of the Ames test, Sugimura and his staff at the Japanese National Cancer Research Institute contributed
significantly to our knowledge of the structures, properties, and precursors in foods of the N-heterocyclic amines. While the methodologies differed, the 1977 isolation and identification of the N-heterocyclic amines (Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2) from a tryptophan pyrolysate paralleled the historic 1932 isolation and identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [B[a]P, benzo[e]pyrene (B[e]P), benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A), perylene] from coal tar. In the 1930s, the Kennaway group in the United Kingdom used ultraviolet spectrophotometry [Hieger (1631)] to monitor coal tar PAHs during their concentration and purification by repeated precipitations and recrystallizations of PAH-picric acid complexes [Cook et al. (796a, 797)]. In the mid-1970s, Sugimura et al. (3829a) in Japan used the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium, TA 98 strain/S-9) to monitor tryptophan pyrolysate mutagens (TrpP-1, Trp-P-2) during their concentration and purification by sequential chromatography on silicic acid, alumina, and CM-Sephadex® columns. References to several early studies on the identification of biologically active compounds in heated foodstuffs are included in Table XVII.F-3, for example, the 1956 study by Kuratsune (2237) of PAHs such as B[a]P in roasted coffee and the similar mid-1960s studies of PAHs in broiled meat [Lijinsky and Shubik (2364a, 2364b)]. PAHs such as B[a] P were identified in both studies. The major concern of the early investigators was the possible presence of tumorigenic PAHs, particularly B[a]P, in the heated foodstuff. Of course, it was subsequently demonstrated that B[a]P, in addition to its tumorigenicity to mouse skin, is also mutagenic in the Ames test. However, its specific mutagenicity is insignificant
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 844
11/24/08 12:29:17 PM
845
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.F-3 N-Heterocyclic Amines: Mutagenicity of Beverages, Heated Foods, and Heated Food Components Food or Food Component
References
Herring, broiled Mackerel, broiled Pike, broiled Sardine, broiled Sardine, broiled
Felton and Knize (1177d), Matsumoto et al. (2492), Nagao et al. (2667a), Sugimura (3828c, 3828e, 3828f), Sugimura et al. (3829), Sugimura and Nagao (3929b), Tanaka et al. (3865b) Commoner et al. (790a), Hargraves and Pariza (1501a), Hayatsu et al. (1555b), Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Takayama et al. (3862c), Turesky et al. (3988b) Commoner et al. (790a), Felton et al. (1177d), Hayatsu et al. (1555a, 1555b), Jägerstad et al. (1916b), Kasai et al. (2037d), Lijinsky and Shubik (2364a, 2364b) a, Nagao et al. (2667c), Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Takayama et al. (3862c), Yasuda et al. (4382a) Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Yamaguchi et al. (4361a) Sugimura and Nagao (3828b) Kasai et al. (2037c, 2037d), Nagao et al. (2667c), Yamaizumi et al. (4361b), Yasuda et al. (4382a) Nagao et al. (2667f) Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Takayama et al. (3862c)
Protein pyrolysates Albumin Soybean globulin Calf thymus Egg white Serum albumin Casein, collagen, Gluten, histone, Insulin, lysozyme, Ovalbumin, zein, Tobacco protein Polypeptides Carnosine Glycyl glycine a Glycyl glutamic acid Glycyl proline Glycyl tryptophan Leucyl glycyl phenylalanine Tryptophanyl alanine Tryptophanyl glycine Tryptophanyl tryptophan Tryptophanyl tyrosine
Matsumoto (2491c), Nagao et al. (2667f), Nebert et al. (2688a), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4387b), Yoshida et al. (4390) Yasuda et al. (4382a) Ohgaki et al. (2849b),Yoshida et al. (4389a) Nagao et al. (2667b) Matsumoto et al. (2491c) Johnson et al. (1968) Matsumoto et al. (2491c)
Amino acid pyrolysates Phenylalanine Lysine Tryptophan
Kato et al. (2048, 2049), Kosuge et al. (2178a), Masuda et al. (2486), Nebert et al. (2688a) Sugimura et al. (3829) Wakabayashi et al. (4102a) Hosaka et al. (1835a), Matsukura et al. (2491a), Negishi and Hayatsu (2689a), Sugimura et al. (3829), Takayama et al. (3862d), Yamazoe et al. (4370a), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4390) Ohgaki et al. (2849b), Sugimura (3828a), Takeda et al. (3863a), Takayama et al. (3862b), Yamamoto et al. (4365a) Smith et al. (3722a)
Foods, heated (grilled, broiled, etc.) Beef, extract Beef, broiled, fried, and/or charred Cuttlefish, broiled Eggs, fish, meat Flour, rice Soybeans Fish, broiled, charred
Glutamic acid Histidine Histidine, 3-methyl-
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 845
11/24/08 12:29:17 PM
846
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.F-3 (C0ntinued) N-Heterocyclic Amines: Mutagenicity of Beverages, Heated Foods, and Heated Food Components Food or Food Component
References
Alanineb, arginine, Asparagine, citrulline, Cysteine, cystine, Glutamic acid, Glutamine, histidine, Lysine, methionine, Ornithine, Phenylalanine, serine, Threonine, tryptophan, Tyrosine, valine
Matsumoto et al. (2491b)
Beverages Coffee, roasted Coffee, instant Tea Brandy Sake
Aeschbacher and Würzner (38a), Kuratsune (2237) c, Nagao et al. (2667d, 2667e), Sugimura (3828d) Aeschbacher and Würzner (38a), Fujita et al. (1256a), Kosugi et al. (2178b) Nagao et al. (2667e), Sugimura (3838d) Sugimura (3828d) Takase and Murakami (3862a)
Cigarette smoke condensate
DeMarini (930-933), Matsumoto et al. (2492), Sugimura (3828d), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388)
No mutagens detected in glycyl glycine pyrolysate. The pyrolysates from the various amino acids studied showed mutagenicities (Ames test) in the following sequence (revertant/mg of pyrolysate), the amino acid (tryptophan) yielding the highest mutagenic pyrolysate listed first: Tryptophan, serine, glutamic acid, ornithine, lysine, arginine, citrulline, threonine, alanine, cystine, glutamine, methionine, cysteine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, histidine, asparagine, valine. c This was a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) study, with emphasis on the generation of B[a]P. a
b
compared to that of several of the N-heterocyclic amines (see Table XVII.F-1). The presence of PAHs in numerous foods was discussed previously. From their studies of heated foods or food pyrolysates (thirty different foods, including rice, flour, soy beans, fish, meat, eggs), Sugimura (3828b) reported: • Mutagenicity was proportional to the protein content. • Mutagenicity was proportional to the levels of specific amino acids (tryptophan, glutamic acid, etc.) in the constituent protein. • Mutagenicity was dependent on water content and heating temperature, for example, for foods with low water content, the mutagens appear at 300°C; for those with high water content, the mutagens appear at 400°C. Estimates of daily exposures to PAHs and N-nitrosamines in foods, beverages, and other factors have been made by numerous investigators. Estimates of exposures to N-heterocyclic amines are limited. Part of the reason is the difference in time span since the particular class of compounds was found to be tumorigenic and/or mutagenic: Exposures to PAHs tumorigenic in laboratory animal bioassays have been studied for more than seven decades (since the
early 1930s and the identification of B[a]P in coal tar by Cook et al. (796a, 797), exposures to N-nitrosamines tumorigenic in laboratory animal bioassays have been studied [Magee and Barnes (2441a)] since the mid-1950s. In contrast, exposures to N-heterocyclic amines tumorigenic in laboratory animal bioassays have only been studied for about thirty years (since the mid-1970s and the availability of the Ames test). Sugimura (3828b) reported comparisons of the mutagenicities (Ames test) of various beverages (coffee, brandy, tea) and CSC. The data are summarized in Table XVII.F-4.
Table XVII.F-4 Mutagenicity of Common Beverages vs. Cigarette Smoke Condensate Agent Cigarette Coffee Teab Brandy a b
Exposure Level
ST Straina
S-9 Mix
Revertants
one, inhaled 200 ml 200 ml 50 ml
TA 98 TA 100 TA 100 TA 100
yes no no no
4000 180000 mutagenic 10500
ST = Salmonella typhimurium Japanese green tea
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 846
11/24/08 12:29:18 PM
847
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.F-5 Benzo[a]pyrene Equivalency of Extracts of Charred Fish and Meat Analyte Sardine Mackerel Beefsteak a b
Sample wt., g
B[a]P Equivalency, ng
Cigarette Equivalency Based on B[a]Pa
100 (3.5)b 60 (2.1) 190 (6.7)
35800 68200 85500
2983 5683 7125
Calculation based on assumption of MSS yield of 12 ng/cig of B[a]P. Number in parentheses is weight in ounces.
As noted previously, Sugimura (3828c) reported in his 1986 review his estimate of the exposure of humans to N-heterocyclic amines with the limited data at his disposal. From his estimate, Sugimura concluded that at that time N-heterocyclic amines might not be serious in human cancer development and no solid information on the estimation of risk of N-heterocyclic amines had been obtained in any direction, either positive or negative.
In another comparison of mutagenicities toward Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, Nagao et al. (2667c) calculated the B[a]P equivalency of extracts of charred fish and meat. Their data, with additions [charred food weight in ounces, cigarette equivalents based on B[a]P], are shown in Table XVII.F-5. Table XVII.F-6 lists identified tobacco smoke components actually or possibly derived from the amino acids glutamic acid, tryptophan, or proline. In the mid-1980s, Rodgman (3253a) discussed both the known relationships as well as several theoretically possible relationships between the three amino acids and many of the compounds listed in Table XVII.F-6. It also lists, with appropriate citations, the amino acid-derived compounds reported in tobacco smoke and citations to the studies demonstrating their mutagenicity and tumorigenicity. Additional references to the tobacco smoke components may be found in the section on the azaarenes (Section XVII.E) and Chapter 4 on the three amino acids (Section IV.B). Table XVII.F-7 summarizes the chronology of the studies pertinent to the N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke and in commonly consumed cooked foodstuffs. Included in Table XVII.F-7
Table XVII.F-6 Components Related to N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco Smoke: Identification and Biological Properties References to Compound Glutamic acid-derived: Glutamic acid Butanoic acid, 2-aminoButanoic acid, 4-amino2-Pyridinamine 2-Pyridinamine, 3-methyl2-Pyridinamine, 6-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole, 2-amino{Glu-P-2} Dipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole, 2-amino-6-methyl{Glu-P-1} Tryptophan-derived: Tryptophan 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole {norharman} 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-butyl9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-ethyl-
Identification in Smoke
Mutagenicitya
Tumorigenicityb
Buyske et al. (526), Izawa et al. (1910), Izawa and Taki (1914) Hecht et al. (1580) Izawa et al. (910), Izawa and Taki (1914) Heckman and Best (1587), Saint-Jalm and Morée-Testa (3386) Lippiello et al. (2378a) Lippiello et al. (2378a), Sanders et al. (3410) Clapp (751), Clapp et al. (755, 756), Massey (2484a)
Yamamoto et al. (4365a), Sugimura (3828c), Lee et al. (2327c)
Ohgaki et al. (2849a, 2849b), Takayama et al. (3862c), Sugimura (3828c)
Clapp (751), Clapp et al. (755, 756), Massey (2484a)
Yamamoto et al. (4365a), Sugimura (3828c), Lee et al. (2327c)
Ohgaki et al. (2849a, 2849b), Takayama et al. (3862c), Sugimura (3828c)
Poindexter and Carpenter (2972)
Levitt et al. (2355a), Nagao et al. (2667g)
USPHS (4010)
Heckman and Best (1587) Schumacher et al. (3553)
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 847
11/24/08 12:29:18 PM
848
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.F-6 (Continued) Components Related to N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco Smoke: Identification and Biological Properties References to Compound 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-methyl- {harman} 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-methyl1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-propenyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino1,4-dimethyl{Trp-P-1} 5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1methyl- {Trp-P-2} 1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole 9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-ethyl9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-(2methylpropyl)9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-pentyl9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino{AaC} 9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino-3methyl- {MeAaC}
Imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, 2-amino-3,4dimethyl- {MeIQ}
Imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, 2-amino-3methyl- {IQ} Indole, 2,3-dimethylIndole-3-acetonitrile Proline-derived: Proline 5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] pyrazine-5,10-dione {pyrocoll}
Identification in Smoke Poindexter and Carpenter (2972)
Heckman and Best (1587) Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368)
Yamashita et al. (4367,4368)
Mutagenicitya
Tumorigenicityb
Levitt et al. (2355a), Nagao et al. (2667g) Schumacher et al. (3553)
USPHS (4010)
Sugimura et al. (3828c, 3829, 3829a), Lee et al. (2327c)
Matsukura et al. (2491a), Hosaka et al. (1835a), Takayama et al. (3862d), Sugimura (3828c) Matsukura et al. (2491a), Hosaka et al. (1835a), Takayama et al. (3862d), Sugimura (3828c)
Sugimura et al. (3829, 3829a), Sugimura (3828c), Lee et al. (2327c)
Heckman and Best (1587) Schumacher et al. (3553) Heckman and Best (1587) Heckman and Best (1587) Heckman and Best (1587) Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388), Matsumoto et al. (2492), Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368) Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388), Matsumoto et al. (2492), Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368) Bao et al. (179a), Levasseur et al. (2354a), Massey (2484a), Rodgman (3255, 3257, 3265), Rodgman and Green (3300), Smith et al. (3714) Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368)
Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388), Matsumoto et al. (2492), DeMarini (933), Sugimura (3828c) Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388), Matsumoto et al. (2492), DeMarini (933), Sugimura (3828c)
Ohgaki et al. (2849b), Sugimura (3828c)
Ohgaki et al. (2849), Lee et al. (2327c)
Ohgaki et al. (2849)
Yoshita et al. (4389a), Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Lee et al. (2327c)
Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Takayama et al. (3862b, 3862c), Tanaka et al. (3865c).
Ohgaki et al. (2849b), Sugimura (3828c)
Rodgman and Cook (3279), Izard et al. (1898), Schmeltz et al. (3506) Izard et al. (1898) Izawa et al.(1910), Izawa and Taki (1914) Mold et al. (2592), Rodgman and Cook (3279), Schmeltz et al. (3505), Testa and Testa (3886) Izard et al. (1898)
5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] pyrazine-5,10-dione, methyl{methylpyrocoll} 5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] Schumacher et al. (3553) pyrazine-5,10-dione, 1,2a,3,5a,8,10ahexahydro5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] Schumacher et al. (3553) pyrazine-5,10-dione, 1,2a,3,5a,8,10a-hexahydro-3-methyl5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a: 1’,2’-d] Schumacher et al. (3553) pyrazine-5,10-dione, octahydroa b
Mutagenic (Salmonella typhimurium). Tumorigenic to mammalian skin.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 848
11/24/08 12:29:18 PM
849
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.F-7 Chronology of N-Heterocyclic Amine Studies Year
Event
1959
The only fused ring N-heterocyclic compound listed by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) as a component of tobacco smoke was the bicyclic compound quinoline. Mold et al. (2592) reported the isolation and identification of the tricyclic N-heterocyclic 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d] pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) from CSC and its relationship to its precursor in tobacco, the amino acid proline. Poindexter and Carpenter (2972) reported the isolation and identification of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) from CSC. They reported that the yield of the total harmans in burley and flue-cured MSSs was between 15 and 20 mg/gram of tobacco smoked, values which were 40 to 50 times that of the harmans in the unsmoked tobacco. Since the weight of tobacco in cigarettes sold at that time approximated 1 gram, the yield of these two compounds was about 15-20 mg/cig. Poindexter and Carpenter concluded from experiments with radiolabeled tryptophan that the harmans (found to be radiolabeled in the smoke) were generated pyrogenetically from a reaction between aldehydes (formaldehyde for norharman, acetaldehyde for harman) and the tryptophan in tobacco. Rodgman and Cook (3279) confirmed the presence in CSC of 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) and also reported the identification of indole, carbazole, and several alkylated indoles and carbazoles. Rodgman and Cook (3279) also reviewed the previously reported biological studies on indole, 3-methylindole (skatole), and carbazole: None of the three was reported to be tumorigenic. Schmeltz et al. (3505) reported 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) as tobacco smoke components. Testa and Testa (3886) also identified 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) as components of CSC. The Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999) briefly discussed only four fused-ring N-heterocyclic compounds in tobacco smoke, quinoline and the two dibenzacridines (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine) and the dibenzocarbazole (7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027). In his review of tobacco smoke composition, Stedman (3797) discussed the identification of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic compounds (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027) as well as the following N-heterocyclic compounds: 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) reported by Mold et al. (2592) and 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman), 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), and 9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole reported by Poindexter and Carpenter (2972). Wakeham (4103) noted the reported presence of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) in cigarette smoke and discussed their formation from a reaction product of tryptophan and an aldehyde. As noted by Rodgman (3253a), the structure of the aldehyde reacting with tryptophan ultimately dictates the structure of alkylated norharmans found (see Table XVII.F-6) in CSC. In addition to 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), Izard et al. (1899) reported the identification of methyl-5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (methylpyrocoll) in CSC. In a 1974 in-house report, a 1975 TCRC presentation, and a 1977 publication on their study of the water-soluble portion of CSC, Schumacher et al. (3553) reported the identifications of 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), 5H,10Hdipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), octahydro-5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (octahydropyrocoll), and 2-ethyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole. Sugimura et al. (3829a) reported the isolation and identification of the N-heterocyclic amines 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5Hpyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) from tryptophan pyrolysates. In separate studies, Levitt et al. (2355a) and Nagao et al. (2667b) demonstrated the mutagenicity of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) in the Ames test. Yamamoto et al. (4365a) reported the isolation and identification of 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) from glutamic acid pyrolysates. Heckman and Best (1587) reported the identification of nearly 270 previously unidentified and over 150 previously identified N-containing components in CSC. These included several components structurally similar to the N-heterocyclic amines: 9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-pentyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole, 1-butyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 9H-1-propenyl-pyrido[3,4-b]indole, and a partially characterized norharman isomer. In the 1979 Surgeon General’s report (4005), the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole, quinoline, and alkylated quinolines in CSC were discussed but not the presence or properties of the N-heterocyclic amines identified in tobacco smoke. Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) and Matsumoto et al. (2492) reported the identification of 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) in CSC.
1960 1961/1962
1962
1964
1964
1968
1971/1972
1974 1974/1975/ 1977
1977 1977 1978 1978/1981
1979
1980/1981 1981
Matsukura et al. (2491a) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in mice of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). Hosaka et al. (1835a) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 849
11/24/08 12:29:18 PM
850
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.F-7 (Continued) Chronology of N-Heterocyclic Amine Studies Year
Event
1982
In the 1982 report of the Surgeon General (4010), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) were classified as “toxic and tumorigenic agents of cigarette smoke” in amounts of 3.2 to 8.1 mg/cig and 1.1 to 3.1 mg/cig, respectively, in cigarette MSS. None of the other N-heterocyclic amines present in tobacco smoke was discussed. Snook and Chortyk (3739) reported the MSS yield of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) to be 1.2 to 13.4 mg/cig; that for 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) to be 0.3 to 3.8 mg/cig. They found a linear relationship between the yield of cigarette MSS “tar” and the yields of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman). In contrast to the 1962 findings of Poindexter and Carpenter, Snook and Chortyk reported that the MSS yields of these two compounds were not influenced by the tobacco type. Demarini (933) reviewed the studies on the mutagenicity of CSC. He discussed the studies of Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) and Matsumoto et al. (2492) on the mutagens 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) (80 ng/cig) and 2-amino-3methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) (7 ng/cig). None of the authors contributing to the 2nd edition of the American Chemical Society’s monograph, edited by Searle (3568), on chemical carcinogens mentioned the tumorigenic and mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines reported in cigarette smoke and/or numerous cooked foods. In fact, the only class of tumorigens in cigarette MSS discussed in the 1400-page treatise was the N-nitrosamines. No tumorigenic PAH was mentioned as a component of cigarette MSS. Ohgaki et al. (2849) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in mice and Takayama et al. (3862b) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2). Takayama et al. (3862c) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of the tobacco smoke component 2-amino-3methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ). Ohgaki et al. (2849a, 2849b) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in mice of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), found in broiled fish, fried beef, beef extract, and CSC. Takayama et al. (3862d) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). Tanaka et al. (3865b) demonstrated the tumorigenicity of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ). In an in-house presentation, Rodgman (3253a) discussed the already identified and other possible theoretical relationships between tryptophan and the substituted norharmans, the tryptophan pyrolysis products 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5Hpyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2), the 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indoles (AaC and MeAaC), indole-3-acetonitrile, and the alkyl- and dialkylindoles. He also discussed the theoretical relationships among glutamic acid, its possible degradation products 2- and 4-aminobutanoic acid, 2-aminopyridine, 2-amino-3- and 6-methylpyridine, and the possible reactions between these substituted aminopyridines to form 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-aminodipyrido[1,2a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2), and two similar products not yet identified. In its 1985 review, published in 1986, of the various problems from exposure to numerous components in tobacco smoke, the IARC (1870) did not designate the N-heterocyclic amines as a problem. IARC did list several tryptophan-derived tobacco smoke isolates including 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman). The per cigarette MSS yields of these two components were listed as 9.5 to 14.1 and 2.5 to 5.8 mg/cig, respectively. No mention was made of the N-heterocyclic amines in CSC or the degree of evidence for their carcinogenicity in animals and humans.
1982/1984
1983
1984
1984
1984/1985 1985
1985
1985/1986
1985/1986
The identification of several N-heterocyclic amines was reported in 1985 and 1986 by Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368). Yamashita et al. (4367,4368) identified and quantitated the per cigarette yields of the following N-heterocyclic amines in CSC: 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC)
1986 1986
0.3 ng/cig 0.3 ng/cig 0.2 ng/cig 16.9 ng/cig 1.6 ng/cig
Hoffmann and Wynder (1808) in their list of tobacco and tobacco smoke tumorigens did not list any N-heterocyclic amine. Sugimura (3828c) reviewed the isolation and identification of the N-heterocyclic amines, their high mutagenicity in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium) of several of them, their tumorigenicity, and their various sources – including CSC for many. However, Sugimura did write the following about the importance of the “cooked food” mutagens as human carcinogens: Taking various factors into consideration, it is probably impractical and not realistic to make risk estimations from the carcinogenicity data on rodents given a single carcinogen. However, for a simple extrapolation of animal data for risk estimation, TD50 values, which are the doses needed to develop cancers in 50% of animals fed on carcinogens [IQ, TrpP-1, Trp-P-2, Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, AaC, and MeAaC] for their life time, have been calculated based on mouse experiments… If we assume the average TD50 value of heterocyclic amines should be about 8mg/kg/day, we can roughly estimate the risk of these carcinogenic heterocyclic amines for human beings. The intake of heterocyclic amines was calculated from available data on their quantities in foods. Apparently the human intake is about 0.0002% times the TD50 obtained from animal data. This means that heterocyclic amines may not be so serious for human cancer development.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 850
11/24/08 12:29:19 PM
851
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.F-7 (Continued) Chronology of N-Heterocyclic Amine Studies Year
Event
Sugimura added: On the other hand, it is also true that human beings are being exposed to many heterocyclic amines and many other carcinogens with tumor promoters and/or suppressing factors for carcinogenesis. At this moment, it is honest to state that no solid information on the estimation of risk of heterocyclic amines has been obtained in any direction, either positive or negative. 1990 1990 1991
1993
Felton and Knize (1177d) reviewed the results of numerous studies on the mutagenicity and tumorigenicity of the N-heterocyclic amines. Manabe et al. (2448) identified the N-heterocyclic amine 1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-amine (PhIP) in CSC. By their addition to tobacco, Clapp (751) reported the contribution of various individual amino acids (asparagine, aspartic acid, arginine, glutamine, glutamic acid, histidine, proline, lysine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, creatine, creatinine) to the Ames test mutagenicity of cigarette MSS. Lee et al. (2327c) reported that the CSC from cigarette MSS significantly inhibited the mutagenicity of several N-heterocyclic amines as measured in the Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium, strain TA 98 in presence of the S-9 mix. The N-heterocyclic amines tested included: 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2), 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1), 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). The mutagenic activities of these mutagens were suppressed as much as 80% by addition of 50 to 100 mg of CSC per plate.
1993 1994 1997
In their list of toxicants and tumorigens in tobacco and MSS, Hoffmann et al. (1773) did not include any N-heterocyclic amines. In its list of toxicants and tumorigens in MSS, OSHA (2825) did not include any N-heterocyclic amines. Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) issued a revised list of tumorigenic components in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Their revision of the Hoffmann-Hecht (1727) list included, in addition to several vapor-phase components, the following eight N-heterocyclic amines: 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2), 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1), 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC)
1998
In a letter to the editors of Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International, Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741) listed eight N-heterocyclic amines as biologically active agents in the MSS of non-filtered cigarettes. They also included the three aza-arenes reported as MSS components by Van Duuren et al. in 1960. Clapp et al. (755,756) reported that reduction of the level of protein in flue-cured tobaccos by 70% resulted in a reduction of 80% in the mutagenicity of the MSS “tar” (strain TA 98 Salmonella typhimurium) and 50% (strain TA 100). Reduction of the protein level in burley tobacco by 50% resulted in reductions in mutagenicity of its MSS “tar” of 81% and 54%, with strain TA 98 and TA 100, respectively. Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743) and Hoffmann et al. (1744) listed eight N-heterocyclic amines as biologically active agents in the MSS of non-filtered cigarettes. In both publications, the three aza-arenes reported as MSS components by Van Duuren et al. in 1960 were listed. In a presentation and publication, Rodgman and Green (3300) discussed the deficiencies of many of the lists of toxicants in cigarette MSS. Rodgman (3265) outlined the major problems with the lists published by Hoffmann and colleagues (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744) and others. Kinae et al. (2095a) reported that N-heterocyclic amines [2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3,4dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), 1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-amine (PhIP)] were produced in an incubated solution of D-glucose and several amino acids at much lower temperatures and longer time periods than those encountered in the cooking of various foodstuffs (beef, poultry, fish). Several N-heterocyclic amines not found in CSC were also generated. The generation of the N-heterocyclic amines, as measured by the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium TA 98), increased in proportion to the conditions imposed: 37°C (90 d), 50°C (30 d), 128°C (2 h)
1999/2000
2001
2002/2003 2003 2005
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 851
11/24/08 12:29:19 PM
852
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVII.F-8 N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 852
11/24/08 12:29:19 PM
853
Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components
Table XVII.F-8 (Continued) N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
are events pertinent to the studies of 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman), and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman). Although none is an N-heterocyclic amine, their pyrogenesis from specific amino acids was the background for the subsequent studies on N-heterocyclic amines, each of which is derived from an amino acid.
Table XVII.F-8 lists, with appropriate citations, the N-heterocyclic amines reported in tobacco and tobacco smoke. While Table XVII.F-8 lists the citations pertinent to the nine highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines, as noted previously, citations pertinent to tobacco smoke components related to them are available in Sections IV.B (amino acids) and XVII.E (aza-arenes).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C017.indd 853
11/24/08 12:29:20 PM
18
Miscellaneous Components
XVIII.A Sulfur-Containing Components Sulfur is a well-known constituent of tobacco and is essential for growth of the plant. In 1990, Tso (3973) reviewed the chemistry, biology, and physiological aspects of sulfur in tobacco. It is absorbed by the plant as sulfate, some of which undergoes reduction during assimilation and becomes incorporated into amino acid components of proteins (18A11). The sulfur content of tobacco varies by tobacco type and has been reported (3973) to range from 0.4% for flue-cured varieties to 1.1% for the Maryland tobacco (4246). Sulfurcontaining (S-containing) compounds in or on tobacco can also come from added flavors and casings such as cocoa, as a contaminant of the leaf or of flavors and casings, or from agrochemicals (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, etc.) applied to the tobacco. Endogenous S-containing compounds of tobacco include numerous proteins, peptides, nucleotides, several amino acids (methionine, cysteine, cystine, taurine, homocysteine), and B vitamins (thiamine and biotin). Sulfur is also available as various inorganic sulfates or sulfides found in tobacco. Sulfur is found in many casings and flavors used on tobacco. Solid flavorants or casing materials used on tobacco, such as cocoa and licorice, are natural products and just like tobacco they contain S-containing amino acids and proteinaceous substances. Some flavor additives used on tobacco products are S-containing compounds. In 1994, the tobacco rod of a cigarette produced by any of the then six major manufacturers could have had any combination of 599 different ingredients (1053), 460 of which were individual compounds as described by Rodgman (3266). Of the 460, Rodgman listed 212 identified as untreated tobacco components, 245 identified in its smoke, and 168 in both tobacco and smoke. Those numbers have changed slightly since several of the 460 components have recently been identified in tobaccos by Leffingwell and Alford (2339a) and Peng et al. (2917a). Within the compounds listed by Doull et al. (1053) are nine S-containing compounds, for example, methyl sulfide, d,l-methionine, 5-methyl-2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde, 3-methylthiopropionaldehyde, and methional. Tobacco contains residual levels of the S-containing compounds in agrochemicals that are used to treat tobacco, for example, Benfuracarb®, Oryzalin®, Thiofide®, Malathion®, Pebulate®, Cyolane®; Thiodicarb®, Trapex®, and Zineb®. Cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) contains a wide variety of S-containing compounds, for example, S-containing amino acids, residues of herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, and growth promoters (Malathion®, Captan®, Thiodan®, α- and β-Endosulfan®, Disulfoton®, Guthion®, and Chlorpyriphos®), certain organic sulfates and sulfides, and decomposition
products of S-containing agrochemicals. MSS components possess a wide variety of S-containing functionalities (thiol, alkylthio, mercapto, isothiocyanatoalkyl, thiazolyl, phosphinothioyl, alkyldithio, phosphoramidothio, phosphonodithio, thiacycloalkyl, thiadiazinyl, thienyl, thiocarbamato, sulfide, sulfonate, sulfonyl, sulfuroxides, and trisulfide). MSS also contains several polycyclic compounds that contain sulfur (18A14), for example, benzothiophenes, dibenzothiophenes, and nonbenzeniod aromatic heterocycles, for example, benzodioxathiepins. The sulfur compounds in cigarette MSS reside in both the volatile and semivolatile fractions of MSS. Some S-containing compounds are also present in the particulate phase of MSS. The largest amount of research on S-containing compounds in MSS has been on those in the vapor phase of MSS. The low molecular weight S-containing compounds are volatile and highly odorous at parts per million and parts per billion concentrations. Their odor characteristics have been reported by a GC-port sniffing technique [Alford and Houpt (18A01), Ayya (18A03)]. Because of the odiferous nature of many of the vaporphase S-containing compounds in MSS their presence has often been considered undesirable. However, it must be kept in mind that smoke is a complex mixture and the contribution of any single component, depending on its concentration, can actually add to the overall characteristic of tobacco smoke. Certain S-containing compounds are excellent tobacco flavors, such as butyl sulfide (floral), furfuryl mercaptan (coffee), and allyl disulfide (garlic, nutty) and provide positive smoke taste characteristics, although their aromas are considered harsh or garlic (2341). S-containing compounds in tobacco are also possible precursors to Maillard reaction flavors. S-containing compounds can participate in Amadori rearrangement and Strecker degradation (18A03). The unpleasantness of single odorants should never be a valid reason to ignore or to reduce their effects in a complex mixture like tobacco smoke. Ayya (18A03) in 1994 posed the question of whether any of the S-containing compounds of tobacco smoke might be important pharmacologically if present in sufficiently high concentration. There are a number of S-containing compounds that are pharmacologically active [Rezanka et al. (18A12)], but none is found in tobacco smoke at concentrations that are of any concern. In terms of any of the S-containing compounds in tobacco or tobacco smoke being biologically active, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has only tested sulfur dioxide, and various sulfites, bisulfites, and metabisulfites. In their 1992 monograph (18A05), IARC stated: There is inadequate evidence for the carcinogenicity in humans of sulfur dioxide, sulfites, bisulfites and metabisulfites. There
855
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 855
11/24/08 12:32:23 PM
856
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
is limited evidence for the carcinogenicity in experimental animals of sulfur dioxide. There is inadequate evidence for the carcinogenicity in experimental animals of sulfites, bisulfites and metabisulfites. Overall evaluation: sulfur dioxide, sulfites, bisulfites and metabisulfites are not classifiable as to their carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3).
IARC provides a classification for it overall evaluations of carcinogenicity to humans (18A04). It classifies individual compounds and mixtures into five categories based on scientific data on humans and animals. The classification is: • • • •
Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans Group 3: Not classifiable as to carcinogenicity to humans • Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans There are no known S-containing compounds in tobacco or tobacco smoke in Group 1, 2A, or 2B. There are only six compounds that are found in Group 3 (Malathion®, ethylenethiourea, Parathion®, Parathion-methyl®, sulfur dioxide, and ethylene sulfide). The evidence for the carcinogenicity in humans of all these compounds was classified as inadequate (18A04). Periodically during the past five decades, various reviews and catalogs on the composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke have been published. Some have listed S-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke, while others have not. In 1936 Bruckner (451) listed 120 known components in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Of the identified compounds that Bruckner listed only one contained sulfur (sulfate). In 1954 Kosak (2170) categorized about fifty components in tobacco smoke whose identities were certain. Under his heading of Inorganic Components Kosak listed hydrogen sulfide and thiocyanic acid (?). The question mark indicated that Kosak did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. Latimer (2270) in 1955 listed 231 compounds identified from tobacco and tobacco smoke. Cystine, methionine, thiamine, and sulfur were present in tobacco and thiocyanic acid, carbonyl sulfide, and methyl mercaptan were identified in tobacco smoke. Johnstone and Plimmer in 1959 (1971) listed 950 compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In their review, they listed only two sulfur compounds as identified in tobacco, cystine and methionine. Obi and Nakano conducted studies on sulfur in tobacco and tobacco smoke, in 1962 (2822). They determined that the sulfur content in Japanese tobacco was 0.3% to 3%, of which 30% to 60% is organic sulfur. In a review of compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke, Philip Morris, Inc. in 1963 (2939) listed seventeen S-containing compounds. Stedman (3797) in 1968 listed 950 identified compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke, of these only ten compounds were S-containing and all were from tobacco smoke. Izawa (1900) in 1961 reported on 440 identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components, of these only two S-containing compounds in tobacco were mentioned (cystine and methionine). Roberts et al. in 1975 (3224) listed 2783
compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In their report, they listed forty-one S-containing compounds identified in tobacco smoke. There were no S-containing compounds reported in tobacco. In 1980, Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed 1889 identified tobacco smoke components in their monograph, forty-six S-containing compounds were listed. IARC in 1986 (1871) listed only three S-containing agrochemicals in tobacco. Elmenhorst and Schultz in 1986 (1140) listed thirteen S-containing compounds in their publication. Roberts in 1988 (3215) tabulated that there were 5868 identified compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. By functional groups, 3044 compounds had been identified in tobacco, 3996 had been identified in smoke, and 1172 were identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Under the function group heading Sulfur Compounds, three compounds had been identified in tobacco, thirty-seven were identified in tobacco smoke, and two compounds were found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. In 1994, Ayya (18A03) summarized the previous work on S-containing compounds in tobacco smoke. He listed thirty-two sulfur compounds that had previously been identified in tobacco smoke. In his report he cited work at Brown and Williams Tobacco Company on the odor characterization of low molecular weight S-containing compounds employing a gas chromatograph with a sniffing port. As mentioned previously several reviews on tobacco and tobacco smoke have not included or have omitted the S-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke These include the reports by Bentley and Berry in 1959 and 1960 (282, 283), Berry (296) in 1963, and the reports by Sakuma et al. (3394, 3397, 3398) in 1983 and 1984. Bentley and Berry reported in 1959 that “Sulphur compounds have been found in smoke [Izawa et al. (1905)] but these have not been identified.” Whether there was a lack of analytical instrumentation and/or methodology for the determination of S-containing compounds in tobacco and smoke or a lack of concern for these types of compounds cannot be said. But it is interesting that even by 1994 (18A03) only about forty S-containing compounds were identified as components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. From 1966 through 1974 several notable studies were conducted on S-containing compounds in tobacco smoke. In 1966, Philippe (2940) reported on the identification of thiocyanogen, thiocyanic acid, hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, methylthionitrite, dimethy1 sulfide, carbon disulfide, and thiophene in MSS. In that same year, ethyl mercaptan was qualitatively detected by Grob (1419). Williams and McRae (4246) in 1967 examined the fate of S-containing compounds in tobacco during cigarette smoking. The nonfiltered cigarettes in their experiments contained approximately 0.5% sulfur. They determined that 61.4% of the total sulfur content of the cigarette was found in the cigarette ash and 33.2% was found in the cigarette butt. They reported that the sulfur content of the whole MSS was 39 µg per cigarette, which was equivalent to 0.5% of the total sulfur in the cigarette. In total, they could account for over 95% of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 856
11/24/08 12:32:23 PM
857
Miscellaneous Components
the total sulfur content measured in the cigarettes used in their experiments. Groenen and Van Gemert (1429) in 1971 and Horton and Guerin (1831) in 1974 reported on the identification of S-containing compounds in the vapor phase of MSS. Both investigator groups employed flame photometric detection (FPD) gas chromatography (GC) for the determination of sulfur compounds in smoke (1831). Groenen and Van Gemert identified thirty-seven compounds while Horton and Guerin identified twenty-eight S-containing compounds. Typical cigarette yields reported by Horton and Guerin were approximately 85 µg of H2S, 35 µg of COS, 2 µg of CS2, and 3 µg of SO2 per cigarette when smoked under standard conditions. Horton and Guerin reported that the vapor phase of MSS contained at least twenty-eight sulfur components but that the quantitative distribution of these components was highly sensitive to sampling methodologies. Quantitation is an obvious issue as Williams and McRae (4246) only could account for 39 µg of sulfur per cigarette in whole MSS. Generally, sulfur compounds in tobacco samples can be converted by wet oxidation to sulfate. The sulfate is then reduced to H2S which is separated by distillation and determined as methylene blue, by the method of Johnson and Nishita (18A06). Protein sulfur can also be determined by the oxidation of sulfur to sulfur dioxide and titration with 0.1 N I2 with starch as an indicator (18A02). These classic methods serve as determinations of total sulfur in a sample. Similar wet methods for the analysis of sulfur compounds in tobacco now employ autoanalyzers and robotics [Mottershead (18A10)]. Total sulfur in the sample can also be analyzed by X-ray emission spectroscopy [Keen et al. (18A07)], atomic absorption spectrometry [Sah and Miller (18A13)], atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) and inductively coupled plasma (ICP-AES) [Littlefield et al. (18A08)] or a variety of other instrumental methods. For example, ESR (electron spin resonance) which is equivalent of EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) has also been used for the analysis of the presence of sulfur in tobacco (18A09). Specific S-containing amino acids in tobacco, for example, methionine, cysteine, and cystine, are generally analyzed by GC, GC-MS or liquid chromatographic techniques such as HPLC and LC-MS. Sulfur in proteins, nucleotides, and peptides are normally analyzed by digestion of samples into free amino acids and then determination of the amino acids by GC or LC. Flame photometric detection (FPD) gas chromatography (GC) (1429, 1831) and flame ionization detection (FID) GC (1419) have been used for the determination of S compounds in tobacco smoke. Although these methods are still used today, GC-mass spectrometry is normally the preferred method for the determination and quantification of S-containing components in MSS. Table XVIII.A-1 lists the S-containing components in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. A total of 260 S-containing components have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Of these compounds, 119 were identified in tobacco smoke, 178 were identified in tobacco, and thirtyseven were identified in both tobacco and smoke. It is interesting to note that seventy-nine of the 260 S-containing components
in tobacco and/or its smoke are compounds used in tobacco agronomy.
XVIII.B Halogenated Components All of the halogens (chlorine [Cl], bromine [Br], fluorine [F], and iodine [I]) are minor constituents of tobacco and are essential for growth of the plant. In 1990, Tso (3973) reviewed the chemistry, biology, and physiological aspects of each halogen in tobacco. Soil contains low levels of all of the halogens in the form of salts (halides). Low levels of these halogenated salts generally promote growth in the plants and improve quality and yield. At high levels of absorption all halides can cause toxicity (3979). The various halides are absorbed by the plant roots and are important in certain oxidative, enzymatic, and plant regulatory processes (3973). The content of Cl, Br, F, and I in tobacco varies by tobacco type, soil, and climatic conditions. Typical ranges of Cl, Br, F, and I reported in tobacco are 0.07% to 3%, 100 to 200 ppm, 4 to 40 ppm, and 0.55 to 1.75 ppm, respectively (3979). Other sources of halogens in tobacco come from trace amounts of halides in fertilizers and from agrochemical treatments of tobacco. Over the last seventy years, several review articles on the constituents of tobacco and tobacco smoke have been published. In 1936 Bruckner (451) discussed the biochemistry of tobacco. In his book, he briefly mentioned that tobacco contained chloride. Kosak (2170) in 1954 categorized about fifty components in tobacco smoke whose identities were certain. Under his heading of Inorganic Components KOSAK listed “Chlorides” (?). The question mark indicated that Kosak did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. Latimer (2270) in 1955 listed 231 compounds identified from tobacco and tobacco smoke. At that time, methyl chloride was the only halogenated compound identified in tobacco smoke. Johnstone and Plimmer in 1959 (1971) listed 950 compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In their review, they listed only one halogenated compound as identified in tobacco, l,l,dichloro-2-2(4,4’-dichlorodipheny1)ethane (TDE or DDD) and two in tobacco smoke, methyl chloride (specifically) and certain other unnamed volatile chlorides. Bentley and Berry in 1959 and 1960 (282, 283), and Berry (296) in 1963 failed to report any halogenated compounds in tobacco or tobacco smoke. Izawa (1900) in 1961 reported 440 identified compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In his report he listed only methyl chloride as being identified in tobacco smoke. In a review of compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke, Philip Morris, Inc. in 1963 (2939) listed seven halogenated compounds: Cl, bromomethane, chloromethane, chloroethane, bromoethane, Endrin®, and TDE. Stedman (3797) in 1968 listed 950 identified compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke, of these only seventeen compounds were halogen-containing. Cl, F, and I were identified in tobacco, along with tobacco residues of methylene bromide, l,l,l-trichloro-2-(4,4’-dichlorodipheny1)ethane (DDT), Dieldrin®, Dyrene®, Endrin®, TDE, Telodrin®, Thiodan®, Toxaphene®, Trichlorfon®, and Diclone®. o-Chloroaniline,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 857
11/24/08 12:32:23 PM
858
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 858
11/24/08 12:32:23 PM
Miscellaneous Components
859
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 859
11/24/08 12:32:24 PM
860
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 860
11/24/08 12:32:25 PM
Miscellaneous Components
861
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 861
11/24/08 12:32:26 PM
862
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 862
11/24/08 12:32:27 PM
Miscellaneous Components
863
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 863
11/24/08 12:32:27 PM
864
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 864
11/24/08 12:32:28 PM
Miscellaneous Components
865
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 865
11/24/08 12:32:31 PM
866
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 866
11/24/08 12:32:32 PM
Miscellaneous Components
867
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 867
11/24/08 12:32:33 PM
868
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 868
11/24/08 12:32:35 PM
Miscellaneous Components
869
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 869
11/24/08 12:32:36 PM
870
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 870
11/24/08 12:32:37 PM
Miscellaneous Components
871
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 871
11/24/08 12:32:40 PM
872
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.A-1 (Continued) Sulfur-Containing Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 872
11/24/08 12:32:41 PM
Miscellaneous Components
ethyl chloride, and agrochemical residues from TDE, Endrin®, chloro-2,2-bis-(4’-chlorophenyl)ethylene (TDEE), Telodrin®, Thoidan®, and Dyrene® were reported in tobacco smoke. Roberts et al. in 1975 (3224) listed 2783 components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In their report, they listed thirty chloro compounds, two bromo-containing compounds, two fluoro-containing compounds, and one iodocontaining compound. Thirty-one halogenated compounds were identified in tobacco smoke and twelve were identified in tobacco, several were found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. In 1980, while noting that the number of confirmed components exceeded 2500, Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) listed 1889 identified tobacco smoke components in their monograph; seventeen were halogenated. In their review, Ishiguro and Sugawara stated: All of the halogenated compounds found in smoke are chlorinated compounds. These probably originate from the chloride ions [3797] in the tobacco or from residual chlorinated organic additives. The chlorine atom in methyl chloride originates [712] mainly from inorganic chlorides.
They listed Cl, Br, I, and F as identified components in tobacco smoke. In their review, Ishiguro and Sugawara also examined several agrochemicals and their decomposition products transferred to smoke. The distribution of the chlorinated organic chemicals was examined in detail. It was clear to them that chlorinated organic agricultural chemicals produced the chlorinated compounds mentioned in their review during smoking. They stated: At present, the use of chlorinated organic insecticides has been banned in many countries, and their residues in tobacco have been decreasing every year. Organophosphorus types and synthetic organic compounds which are less likely to persist have become the mainstay of agricultural chemicals for tobacco cultivation, displacing the chlorinated organic types.
Unfortunately, their prediction was not totally correct as a great variety of chlorinated organic agrochemicals are still being discovered and used today in parts of the world. However, since 1969 the use of chlorinated pesticides has been banned in the cultivation of tobacco in the United States. As a result, l,l,l-trichloro-2-(4,4’-dichlorodipheny1)ethane (DDT) and TDE in tobacco and in cigarette smoke have decreased drastically. In the tobacco of a cigarette made in 1965, 13.4 ppm DDT and 20.2 ppm TDE were measured, and in the tobacco of the leading cigarette brand made in 1993, only 0.02 ppm DDT and 0.013 ppm TDE were detected, a decrease of more than 98% (999). The small amounts of residual DDT and TDE in more recently produced cigarettes appear to originate from imported tobaccos used for blended cigarettes (1714). It is interesting to note the following: despite the fact that DDT was banned from agronomic use on tobacco in the United States in 1969, Chopra and his colleagues between 1969 and 1973 conducted exceptionally detailed studies on the degradation products generated during the smoking process from the p,p’-DDT in p,p’-DDT-treated cigarettes (703,
873
707–709, 711–714). Examination of the citations in the catalog (Table XVIII.B-3) of chloro compounds identified in the smoke from DDT-containing tobacco indicates that Chopra and his colleagues identified ten chloro compounds, including transferred DDT. New types of chlorinated organic agrochemicals are still being developed. Their popularity and efficiency have not been displaced by organophosphorus types of agrochemicals or other synthetic organic compounds. Sakuma et al. (3394, 3397, 3398) in 1983 and 1984 reported on the identification of numerous compounds in tobacco smoke; no halogenated compounds were reported. IARC, in 1986 (1871), listed only four halogen-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke in their report on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: vinyl chloride and the agricultural chemicals, DDT, Captan®, and Endrin®. Of these compounds, only vinyl chloride and DDT showed sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals according to the IARC criteria. Most recently in 2005, Eberhardt (21A19) prepared an extensive review of pesticides used on tobacco, the transfer rates of pesticides to MSS and sidestream smoke (SSS), and decomposition products of pesticide residues identified in MSS. In his review, much data previously presented by Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) were presented and updated. The vast majority of the halogenated compounds presented in this chapter are covered in other chapters of this book, for example, Chapters 4, 9, 10, 19, 20, and 21. One particular group of halogenated compounds only reviewed in this chapter is the dioxins. Dioxins are polychlorinated heterocycles. The three forms found in tobacco and tobacco smoke are polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorodibenzofurans, and polychlorinated biphenyls. Another group of compounds that is not reviewed elsewhere in the book is the Freon® compounds. Green et al. (1375b) recently reviewed the various chemicals used in the expansion of tobacco and their effect on cigarette MSS properties. In their review, Green et al. (1375b) discussed the use of various Freon® compounds for tobacco expansion. Rix, in 1989, analyzed expanded tobacco for the expansion agent Freon® 123 (4859). Additionally, sulfur hexafluoride and perfluoropropane have been investigated as alternate tobacco expanding agents (4860, 18B17). As a result, these classes of compounds will not be discussed further in this chapter and the reader is directed to the review by Green et al. (1375b) and references from R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (4859, 4860, 18B05, 18B06 18B08, 18B16, 18B17). In 2002, Rodgman and Green (3300) reviewed the literature on tobacco smoke toxicants. In their review, they discussed the polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDDs and PCDFs) identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Rodgman and Green noted that among the smoke toxicants conspicuous in their absence from all toxicant lists except that of Fowles and Bates (1217) are the polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorodibenzofurans (PCDFs). The presence of dioxins in cigarette smoke was first reported in 1980 by Crummett (854). There are at least five other publications in which the presence of dioxins
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 873
11/24/08 12:32:41 PM
874
(PCDDs and PCDFs) in cigarette tobacco or its MSS (3300) is reported. These include publications by Muto and Takizawa (2664), Ball et al. (177), Matsueda et al. (2490, 2491), and Löfroth and Zebühr (2391). The smoke yield data of Muto and Takizawa (2664) were obtained from a single smoking puff that entirely consumed the cigarette and is clearly not appropriate for comparisons of MSS yields obtained by FTC or CORESTA methods. The MSS and SSS data of Löfroth and Zebühr (2391) were obtained from only one Swedish cigarette brand. The PCDD and PCDF data reported by Matsueda et al. (2491) were for the amount of these compounds contained in the cigarette tobacco, rather than the smoke. The smoke yield data for the Ball et al. (177) and Matsueda et al. (2490) experiments were similar. The Ball et al. data were collected and analyzed by a well-validated method, and the laboratory where the analyses were performed, that is, ERGO Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Hamburg, has been accredited by the World Health Organization (WHO) for dioxin analysis (177). The analytical data of Ball et al. (177) represent results from the ten top-selling brands in Germany during the fourth quarter of 1989. The ERGO scientists chose to present individual data on each of the tested cigarettes. It should be noted that the most toxic isomer, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin (TCDD), was not detected in any of the samples and additionally, not every isomer present was quantifiable in each product tested. The total amount of total PCDDs and PCDFs was 7.50 and 2.98 pg/cigarette, respectively (see Table 2 of 3300). In 1998, Radovanovic ´ and Mišic ´ (18B15) examined the MSS of Yugoslavian cigarettes for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). They identified ten PCBs. The level of PCBs identified ranged from less than 1 ng/g to 78.1 ng/g of smoke condensate (18B15). Generally, the levels of PCBs in MSS are considerably less than the PCDDs and PCDFs (3715). Dioxins are not typical herbicides used on tobacco. So where do they come from and why are they so important? 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) was introduced in 1944 as the first of the phenoxy herbicides, phenoxyacetic acid derivatives, or hormone weed killers. The phenoxy herbicides have complex mechanisms of action resembling those of auxins (growth hormones). They affect cellular division, activate phosphate metabolism, and modify nucleic acid metabolism. These herbicides are highly selective for broadleaf weeds and are translocated throughout the plant. 2,4-D provided most of the impetus in the commercial search for other organic herbicides in the 1940s. Several compounds belonged to this group, of which 2,4-D and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T) are the most familiar. Other important compounds in this group are 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acid (2,4-DB), 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), and 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid (Silvex® or Fenoprop®) [Ware and Whitacre (18B18)]. 2,4-D, MCPA, and 2,4,5-T have been used worldwide for years in very large volume. The latter product, 2,4,5-T, used mainly to control woody perennials, became the subject of extended investigation, particularly because of its use in Vietnam in combination with 2,4-D as Agent Orange.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Certain samples were found to contain small amounts of a highly toxic impurity, TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin), commonly referred to as tetrachlorodioxin, or dioxin. Although alterations in manufacturing procedures reduced the dioxin content to minimal levels, 2,4,5-T registrations were cancelled and the product voluntarily removed by the manufacturers in 1985 (18B18). 2,4-D has been and continues to be one of the most useful herbicides ever developed. More than 33 million pounds manufactured in the United States are used each year in thirty-five ester and salt forms. In agriculture, it is used on cereal, grain crops, and sugar cane for the control of broadleaf weeds, and on rights-of-way, turf and lawns, and in forest conservation programs. The manufacturing process for 2,4-D used in the United States does not result in any level of tetrachlorodioxin contamination. Other members of the phenoxys in wide use are 2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)propionic acid (Dichlorprop® or 2,4-DP), 4-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) butanoic acid (MCPB), and 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) propanoic acid (Mecoprop® or MCPP) (18B18). None of these compounds [2,4-DB, 2,4-DP, MCPB, MCPA, MCPP, 2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid] has been found in tobacco or tobacco smoke. Of the three forms of dioxins found in tobacco and tobacco smoke, the polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs) are a group of chemical compounds that are among the most toxic and hazardous pollutants in the environment. The PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs compounds, collectively referred to as dioxins, are impurities associated with certain end products resulting from the treatment of chlorinated benzenes at elevated temperature and pressure under alkaline conditions. The most notable contaminant of the group is TCDD (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) which can be formed along with other dioxin compounds during the manufacture of several commercially important products such as the herbicide 2,4,5-T, the fungicide pentachlorophenol, and the germicide Hexachlorophene® (18B19). Numerous investigators have found PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs in tobacco as well as tobacco smoke [1457, Gichner et al. (18B14), Djordjevic et al. (1000, 1006), Radovanovic ´ and Mišic ´ (18B15)]. Suspicions of the possible long-term health hazards of dioxins arose after it was found that 2,4,5-T was teratogenic in the rat and mouse [Courtney et al. (18B10)]. Shortly thereafter it was discovered that the 2,4,5-T sample used in this study contained about 30 ppm TCDD (18B10). It was primarily the report by Courtney et al. (18B10) implicating TCDD as a contaminant of 2,4,5-T that led to its further evaluation for teratogenicity [Courtney and Moore (18B11)] and its eventual testing for mutagenicity. These and other similar reports published during the late 1960s and early 1970s also stimulated toxicological studies on other dioxin derivatives as well as studies dealing with issues such as environmental contamination and movement and analytical detection of these compounds. Numerous detailed reviews summarizing work in these areas have been published. The latest and perhaps the most comprehensive review was prepared by the World Health Organization in 2002 (18B07). Additionally, IARC has prepared a monograph
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 874
11/24/08 12:32:41 PM
Miscellaneous Components
on dioxins (7A03) and Wassom et al. (18B19) reviewed the genetic toxicology of polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins. Dioxins are produced inadvertently as a by-product of chemical production or during combustion and are widespread pollutants in the environment. They are ubiquitous. The biggest source of PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs is the large-scale burning of municipal and medical waste. Other sources include: • The production of iron and steel; • Backyard burning of household waste, especially plastics; • Fuel burning, including diesel fuel and fuel for agricultural purposes and home heating; • Wood burning, especially if the wood has been chemically treated; • Electrical power generation; and • Tobacco smoke. Dioxins can also be produced from natural processes, such as forest fires, explosions, and volcanic eruptions. Most dioxins are introduced to the environment through the air. The airborne chemical can attach to small particles that can travel long distances in the atmosphere. PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs are found in very small amounts in the environment, including in the air, water, and soil. As a result they are also present in some foods. They can also present a health risk at elevated dosages. As for tobacco smoke, the dosage of dioxins from cigarettes is extremely low. Exposure estimates suggest that the smoking of twenty cigarettes per day contributes approximately 2% to 4% of the total daily exposure to dioxins for a 70 kg adult (177). The major source of exposure to PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBS is the diet [Canady et al. (18B07)]. Rodgman and Green (3300) noted in their review of MSS toxicants that certain dioxins are antitumorigens. Slaga and DiGiovanni (3685) summarized the studies in which dioxins were shown to interfere with the enzyme pathways responsible for tumorigenesis of several of the most potent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The dioxins were not listed as MSS toxicants in previous tabulations of MSS toxicants reviewed by Rodgman (3255, 3255a, 3257, 3265) and Rodgman and Green (3300). In fact, only one MSS toxicant list issued since 1990, that of Fowles and Bates (1217), has included the dioxins even though their presence in MSS was known in 1980 (854). Dioxins are antitumorigenic to DMB[a]A (7,12-dimethylbenz[a] anthracene), MC (3-methylcholanthrene, more recently named 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene), B[a]P (benzo[a]pyrene), 7-MB[a]A (7-methylbenz[a]anthracene), 12-MB[a]A (12methylbenz[a]anthracene), 5-MeC (5-methylchrysene), and DB [a,h]A (dibenz[a,h]anthracene) [Berry et al. (18B04), Cohen et al. (18B09), DiGiovanni et al. (976, 18B12)].
875
The IARC classification of carcinogenicity places twenty-five halogen-containing compounds in tobacco or tobacco smoke in Groups 1, 2A, 2B, and 3. Table XVIII.B-1 lists the individual halogen-containing chemicals (agents) and families of chemicals (groups of agents) identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. IARC lists 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and vinyl chloride as Group 1 human carcinogens. Trichloroethylene, epichlorohydrin [(chloromethyl)oxirane], ethylene dibromide, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are listed by IARC as Group 2A (probably carcinogenic to humans). Ten halogen-containing compounds are listed in Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans): Chlordane®, p-chloroaniline, chloroform, chlorophenoxy herbicides, chlorothalonil (2,4,5,6-tetrachloro-1,3-benzenedicarbonitrile), DDT (p,p’-DDT), dichloromethane (methylene chloride), 1,3-dichloropropene, Heptachlor®, and hexachlorobenzene. Nine halogen-containing compounds are listed in Group 3 (not classifiable as to carcinogenicity to humans): chloroethane, m-dichlorobenzene, o-dichlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloropropane, Hexachlorophene®, Methoxychlor®, methyl iodide, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. There are numerous analytical methodologies to identify and quantify halogenated compounds in tobacco and smoke. The method of analysis will vary among the halogenated compounds and particularly the pesticide types. Sources of methods include the FDA Pesticide Analytical Manuals (PAMs) I and II (18B13), the FDA Index of Residue Analytical Methods (RAM) (18B13), the methods in the Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (18B02, 18B03), and methods found in journal articles. Generally, the preferred methods of analysis involve gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), or GC-mass spectrometry (MS) techniques. Flame ionization detectors (FID) are normally used for quantitative analysis of halogen-containing organics, while electron capture detectors (ECD) are preferred for quantitative determination of PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs and other pesticides [Radovanoviic ´ and Mišiic ´ (18B15)]. There are 242 identified halogenated compounds in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. As seen in Table XVIII.B-2, the vast majority (192 compounds) contain chlorine only. Over 85% of all the halogenated compounds found in tobacco and tobacco smoke are either halogenated agrochemicals, impurities found in the agrochemicals (PCDDs, PCDFs, PCBs), or decomposition products from the agrochemicals. Table XVIII.B-3 lists the 242 halogenated compounds identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. In a few cases, a halogenated component has been identified in tobacco substitute smoke. Table XVIII.B-3 is divided by halogen type (chloro-, bromo-, iodo-, and fluoro-compounds) and includes several halogenated compounds with two or more halogens (mixed halogenated compounds).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 875
11/24/08 12:32:41 PM
876
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-1 Halogenated Components Identified in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke (18A04) IARC Group Classification Group 1:
Group 2A:
Group 2B:
Group 3:
IARC Chemical Name (Number of Compounds)
CAS No.
IARC Volume, Date
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin
1746-01-6
Vol. 69, 1997
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
Vol. 19, Suppl. 7, Vol. 97, in preparation
Trichloroethylene Epichlorohydrin
79-01-6 106-89-8
Vol. 63, 1995 Vol. 11, Suppl. 7, Vol. 71, 1999
Ethylene dibromide
106-93-4
Vol. 15, Suppl. 7, Vol. 71, 1999
Polychlorinated biphenyls (11)
1336-36-3
Vol. 18, Suppl. 7, 1987
Chlordane p-Chloroaniline Chloroform Chlorophenoxy herbicides (5) Chlorothalonil DDT [p,p’-DDT] Dichloromethane [methylene chloride] 1,3-Dichloropropene Heptachlor Hexachlorobenzene
57-74-9 106-47-8 67-66-3
Vol. 79, 2001 Vol. 57, 1993 Vol. 73, 1999 Vol. 41, Suppl. 7, 1987 Vol. 73, 1999 Vol. 53, 1991 Vol. 71, 1999 Vol. 41, Suppl.7, Vol. 71, 1999 Vol. 79, 2001 Vol. 79, 2001
Chloroethane m-Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloropropane Hexachlorophene Methoxychlor Methyl iodide Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (18) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1897-45-6 50-29-3 75-09-2] 542-75-6 76-44-8 118-74-1 75-00-3 541-73-1 95-50-1 78-87-5 70-30-4 72-43-5 74-88-4
Comment by IARC Overall evaluation upgraded from 2A to 1 with supporting evidence from other relevant data.
Overall evaluation upgraded from 2B to 2A with supporting evidence from other relevant data. Overall evaluation upgraded from 2B to 2A with supporting evidence from other relevant data.
Vol. 52, Vol. 71, 1999 Vol. 73, 1999 Vol. 73, 1999 Vol. 41, Suppl. 7, Vol. 71, 1999 Vol. 20, Suppl. 7, 1987 Vol. 20, Suppl. 7, 1987 Vol. 41, Suppl. 7, Vol. 71, 1999 Vol. 69, 1997 Vol. 20, Suppl. 7, Vol. 71, 1999
71-55-6
Agents, groups of agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances (associated with tobacco) evaluated in IARC Monographs Volumes 1-95. This list contains all agents evaluated as of November-December 2006 that are considered: Carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), and possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). For details of the evaluation, the relevant Monograph should be consulted, see http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/crthgr01.php. Those agents listed have been identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke.
Table XVIII.B-2 The Distribution of Halogenated Components Identified in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Total No. Compounds
Tobacco
Smoke
Tobacco and Smoke
Agrochemical/ Decomposition Product
Other
Chloro Bromo Iodo Fluoro Mixed halogens
192 12 4 14 20
123 11 3 13 19
111 6 2 3 9
42 5 1 2 8
171 7 2 9 11
21 5 2 5 9
Total
242
169
131
58
200
42
Halogen
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 876
11/24/08 12:32:42 PM
Miscellaneous Components
877
Table XVIII.B-3 Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 877
11/24/08 12:32:43 PM
878
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 878
11/24/08 12:32:44 PM
Miscellaneous Components
879
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 879
11/24/08 12:32:45 PM
880
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 880
11/24/08 12:32:46 PM
Miscellaneous Components
881
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 881
11/24/08 12:32:47 PM
882
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 882
11/24/08 12:32:48 PM
Miscellaneous Components
883
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 883
11/24/08 12:32:49 PM
884
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 884
11/24/08 12:32:50 PM
Miscellaneous Components
885
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 885
11/24/08 12:32:51 PM
886
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 886
11/24/08 12:32:52 PM
Miscellaneous Components
887
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 887
11/24/08 12:32:53 PM
888
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 888
11/24/08 12:32:54 PM
Miscellaneous Components
889
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 889
11/24/08 12:32:56 PM
890
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 890
11/24/08 12:32:57 PM
Miscellaneous Components
891
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 891
11/24/08 12:32:58 PM
892
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XVIII.B-3 (continued) Halogenated and Related Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C018.indd 892
11/24/08 12:32:59 PM
19
Fixed and Variable Gases
This chapter deals with gases found in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The gases discussed will be mainly inorganic and not organic gases. Two types of gases will be discussed, fixed gases and variable gases. In the atmosphere, gases, the volume percentages of which do not change, are called fixed gases. Table XIX-1 gives the volume percentages of these fixed gases. At altitudes below 100 km, nitrogen (N2) makes up about 78% of all atmospheric gas by volume and oxygen (O2) makes up about 21%. The volume percentages of these fixed gases are constant with increasing altitudes, and the partial pressures of N2 and O2 are constant fractions of air pressure. Together, N2 and O2 make up 99% of all gases in the atmosphere by volume. Argon (Ar) at 0.93% makes up the bulk of the remaining 0.97%, with neon (Ne), helium (He), krypton (Kr), and xenon (Xe) present in trace quantities (19A04). As a result, the concentrations of fixed gases are the same not only in the atmosphere but in every material present on the Earth’s surface where atmospheric gases reside. Variable gases are gases with volume percentages that change with time and location. For example, water vapor in different areas of the world varies with climatic conditions and geography. Radon is a variable gas as it occurs in only specific areas of the world. The major variable gases are water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), low molecular weight hydrocarbons, and simple aromatic chemicals. Much of the variability in the concentration of these gases in the atmosphere arises from the combustion of fossil fuels. Table XIX-2 summarizes the volume percentages of some variable gases in a clean atmosphere and a polluted atmosphere, such as urban or industrial areas. Water vapor can vary tremendously and is dependent primarily on the environment. For example, water vapor in the atmosphere is always higher in areas near water and always lower in desert areas. As can be seen, some of the inorganic and organic gases change appreciably (CO, SO2, NO, NO2, organic gases) while others change minimally (CO2, O3), even in polluted atmospheres (19A04). For example, the concentration of CO2 at point sources such as smoke stacks can be very elevated. Ozone concentrations during electrical storms can be elevated to the point that its characteristic odor is noticeable. As a result they are termed variable gases. Again, just as the fixed gases are present in nearly every material present on the Earth’s surface, variable gases are also present in all materials that are porous and can be found on the surfaces of many other materials. Tobacco contains all of the fixed gases that are present in the atmosphere. It also contains a variety of variable gases
because it is grown in areas lacking a pristine atmosphere. Tobacco is often treated with agrochemicals (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, etc.). As such, these chemicals can decompose and create residues in or on the tobacco. Additionally, as tobacco is often cured in atmospheres that contain pollutants and/or combustion gases, for example, NO, NO2, SO2, SO3, the concentration of variable gases in the leaf can be elevated. Nitrogen and oxygen are the most plentiful fixed gases found in tobacco. Although the other fixed gases Ar, Ne, He, Kr, and Xe have not been identified in tobacco there is no reason to believe that they are not present. The variable gases found in tobacco include ammonia (NH3), bromine (Br2), CO2, CO, chlorine (Cl2), fluorine (F2), iodine (I2), phosgene (COCl2), hydrazine (H2N-NH2), hydrogen cyanide (HCN), isocyanic acid (H-N=C=O), nitrous oxide (N2O), NO, NO2, mixed nitrogen oxides [N2O + NO + NO2] or NOx, phosphine (PH3), radon (Rn and 222Rn), and H2O. Biochemically, some of these variable gases are produced by the plant to regulate growth processes, for example, NO, NO2, while others are formed, for example, NH3 via fertilization, or absorbed by the plant (H2O) and used as energy sources. Some of the variable gases are found as plant residues from the atmosphere (Rn), while some are residues from water sources (halogens), agrochemicals (phosgene, hydrazine, HCN, isocyanic acid, phosphine, etc.) or from other environmental sources, for example, SO2. The concentration of the fixed and variable gases in tobacco smoke is not directly related to the concentration of these gases in tobacco. As tobacco smoke is the result of combustion and pyrolysis of tobacco, the concentration and types of fixed and variable gases formed vary considerably. Over the years, several scientific articles and reviews have been published that catalog the fixed and variable gases found in tobacco and tobacco smoke (172, 1140, 1067, 1140, 1971, 2068, 2170, 2799a, 3224, 3797, 4012, 4332, 19A05). One of the earliest articles that identified certain fixed and variable gases in tobacco smoke was published by Kosak (2170) in 1954. Kosak listed O2, NH3, CO, CO2, HCN, other “cyanides” (?), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), thiocyanic acid (?), “chlorides” (?), “nitrates” (?), and “unsaturated hydrocarbons.” The question marks associated with some of the compounds listed by Kosak indicate that he did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. It is conceivable that the designation “chlorides” (?) and “nitrates” (?) could have indicated the presence of chlorine, NO, NO2 and other nitrogen oxides (NOx) in tobacco smoke. Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) reviewed the constituents of tobacco and tobacco smoke in 1959 and listed CO, CO2, carbonyl sulfide (COS), NH3, carbon disulfide (CS2), cyanogen [(CN)2], hydrogen cyanide (HCN), thiocyanogen [(SCN)2], NO, and numerous small saturated and unsaturated 893
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 893
11/13/08 5:43:18 PM
894
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIX-1 Volume Percentages of Fixed Gases in the Earth’s Atmosphere Gas Name
Chemical Formula
Molecular nitrogen Molecular oxygen Argon Helium Neon Krypton Xenon
N2 O2 Ar He Ne Kr Xe
Percent 78.08 20.95 0.93 0.0015 0.0005 0.0001 0.000005
hydrocarbons as components of the vapor phase of cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS). Keith and Tesh reported in 1965 on the measurement of the total MSS issuing from a burning cigarette (2068). By using a simple puffing mechanism that employed a cold trap packed with 5 Å molecular sieve pellets, they were able to quantitatively measure the total vapor mixture from a burning cigarette. This quantity, when combined with the separately trapped particulate material, provided a measure of the total effluent. It was found, contrary to previous thinking, that the vapor components of smoke comprised over 95% of the weight of material collected from a burning cigarette. By far the greatest proportion of the collected weight of the total MSS vapor phase was contributed by the air entering the cigarette. Wynder and Hoffmann in 1967 (4332) reviewed the known constituents of the particulate and vapor phase of MSS. Chapter VIII of their book provided historical information on our understanding of cigarette combustion processes and the composition of the vapor phase of tobacco smoke at that time. Wynder and Hoffmann cited the pioneering work of
Jarrell and de la Burde (1924) and Keith and Tesh (2068), who reported in 1965 that the O2 content in whole MSS is a function of air entering through the burning cone of the cigarette, part of which is consumed during combustion, and diluting air entering through the cigarette paper. The cigarette burning rate, dictated by the cigarette rod packing density, the tobacco type employed, and the cigarette paper air permeability, affected O2 consumption. Nitrogen and argon do not react with tobacco constituents during the burning as they are inert gases. Their concentrations were affected by the air entering through the burning cone, mainly the diluting air. Jarrell and de la Burde (1924) found that the burning zone of a cigarette represented a reducing atmosphere. The H2 in the whole smoke was derived nearly exclusively from the burning of tobacco. During burning, certain tobacco components split off elementary hydrogen, which for the most part formed water with available oxygen. The presence of 8% H2 (by volume) in the gas leaving the burning cone was indicative of the existence of a reducing atmosphere in the fire cone. The large concentrations of both CO and CO2 relative to air indicated that several combustion and pyrolysis processes were occurring in the burning cigarette. The low ratio of CO2 to CO indicated that incomplete combustion of tobacco was occurring. The ratio of CO2 to CO is considered to be an index (3482) of the combustibility of tobacco. Generally, the ratio of CO2 to CO is less than three in nonfiltered cigarettes. In 1968, Stedman reviewed the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke (3797). The review noted that gaseous NH3, I2, and H2O were identified constituents of tobacco. It also listed CO, CO2, NH3, CS2, COS, Cl2, F2, H2S, HSCN, and (SCN)2 as compounds present in the vapor phase of MSS. In 1968, Elmenhorst and Schultz (1140) reported on the concentrations of various inorganic gaseous components in the vapor phase of MSS (Table XIX-3).
Table XIX-2 Volume Percentages of Some Variable Gases (Inorganic and Organic) in the Atmosphere (19A04) Gas Name Inorganic Water vapor Carbon dioxide Carbon monoxide Ozone Sulfur dioxide Nitric oxide Nitrogen dioxide Organic Methane Ethane Ethene Formaldehyde Aromatics
Chemical Formula
Clean Atmosphere (ppbv)
Polluted Atmosphere (ppbv)
H2O CO2 CO O3 SO2 NO NO2
3000-4.0 × 107 365000 40-200 10-100 0.02-1 0.005-0.1 0.01-0.3
5.0 × 106-4.0 × 107a 365000 2000-10000 10-350 1-30 0.05-300 0.2-200
CH4 C2H6 C2H4 HCHO C6H5R
1800 0-2.5 0-1 0.1-1 —
1800-2500 1-50 1-30 1-200 1-30
ª 4.0 × 107- indicates that the volume percentage is negligible, on average. R = hydrogen or alkyl functionality
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 894
11/13/08 5:43:20 PM
895
Fixed and Variable Gases
Table XIX-3 Fixed Gases in the Vapor Phase of MSS (1140) Compound H2 O2 N2 Ar H2O
Concentration/Cigarette 0.7-1.8 vol % 11-17 vol % 67-78 vol % 0.8 vol % 6-9 mg
In 1975, Roberts et al. (3224) reported on R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company’s (RJRT) literature study of tobacco and smoke components. RJRT had been collecting information from the literature and conducting extensive research on the identification of chemicals in tobacco and smoke since the earlier 1950s. As of 1975, RJRT had compiled a listing of 2783 components from tobacco, tobacco smoke, and other smoking products. Of these compounds 1235 were tobacco isolates, 2266 were tobacco smoke components, and 356 had been identified from other smoking products. Approximately one-half of all the tobacco and smoke components were first isolated by RJRT research personnel. The lists were divided into functional group classes, including fixed and variable gases found in tobacco and smoke. Twenty-five gases had already been identified in tobacco and smoke by 1975. The number of fixed and variable gases identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke has not changed substantially since then. Ishiguru and Sugawara in 1980 (1884) cataloged the components of tobacco smoke. In their review, they listed 1889 components of tobacco smoke [see Table 1 in (1884)]. They commented that the number could be about 2500 but they had omitted those components that were only partially identified. Among the components that they discussed were the fixed and variable gases in tobacco smoke. In 1982, Dube and Green (1067) calculated the contribution of the fixed gases from 500 mg of unfiltered cigarette MSS. From 500 mg of whole smoke, 22.5 mg was the wet
particulate matter and 67.5 mg was vapor-phase compounds, of which ~10% (or 6.75 mg) was water vapor, ~80% (or 54 mg) was CO2, and ~10% was organic compounds. The remaining 410 mg of whole smoke contained 310 mg of N2, 65 mg of O2, 20 mg of CO, an additional 5 mg of CO2, 4 mg of Ar, and 1 mg of H2. Similar analyses were conducted by Keith and Tesh in 1965 (2068), Norman in 1977 (2799a), and Hoffmann and Hecht in 1990 [see Table 1 in (1727)]. Table XIX-4 illustrates the data on fixed and variable gases in whole tobacco smoke that was provided by these investigators. In 1999, Norman (19A05) and Baker (172) reviewed the literature on cigarette design and materials and smoke chemistry, respectively. Their works represent the most recent and comprehensive reviews on these subjects. Baker discussed the present fundamental knowledge of cigarette combustion and smoke formation including how the concentrations of fixed gases, for example, O2 and H2, fluctuate during cigarette combustion and how variable gases, for example, CO and CO2, are formed. Norman discussed the complicated field of cigarette design and how each design variable (tobacco type, cigarette shape, weight, and size, cigarette paper properties, filter designs, etc.) affects cigarette performance and ultimately cigarette smoke yields (including fixed and variable gases).
XIX.A Analytical Methods In 1996, Green and Rodgman (1373) summarized all the historical and currently used analytical methods for the identification of chemicals isolated from tobacco and tobacco smoke. Their review is so complete and so well documented that the reader is directed to read their review article to determine the analytical method best suited for the analysis of a particular chemical constituent in tobacco and smoke. All of the past and current methods for the determination of fixed and variable gases in tobacco and tobacco smoke can be found in their article and will not be included in this chapter. Only a few specific examples of analytical methods for the most important variable gases will be provided (1884).
Table XIX-4 Major Fixed and Variable Gases in Non-Filtered Whole Tobacco Smoke Keith and Tesh (2068)
Dube and Green (1067)
Norman (2799a)
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
Component
mg/cig (%)
mg/cig (%)
% only
mg/cig (%)
Nitrogen Oxygen Carbon dioxide Carbon monoxide Water Argon Hydrogen
295 (67.2) 66.8 (13.3) 68.1 (9.8) 16.2 (3.7) 5.8 5.0 (0.8) 0.7 (2.2)
310 (62a) 65 (13) 59 (11.8) 20 (4.0) 6.75 (1.4) 4 (0.08) 1 (0.2)
58 12 13.0 3.5 1 0.5 (Ar + H2) —
280-320 (56-64b) 50-70 (11-14) 45-65 (9-13) 14-23 (2.8-4.6) 7-12 (1.4-2.4) 5 (1.0) 0.5-1.0
Total weight (or %)
457.6 (97)
465.75 (93.2)
88
401.5-496 (81.7-99)
Percent of total tobacco smoke generated based on 500 mg of whole smoke (1067). b Number in parentheses represents % of individual compound identified in fixed gases from whole smoke (1727). a
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 895
11/13/08 5:43:21 PM
896
Although there is no standard International Organization for Standardization (ISO) or U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) method for the analysis of fixed gases in cigarette smoke, fixed gases are normally analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS), gas chromatography (GC), or GC-MS. Generally, the fixed gases, such as N2, O2, Ar, He, and H2, have been determined chromatographically with separation based on molecular size. A molecular sieve packing is normally used in a stainless steel packed column. Samples are introduced with either a gas-tight syringe or a sampling valve with a fixed volume loop. Upon injection, the sample is swept through a gas chromatograph with carrier gas. After separation in the column, components are quantified based on the difference in thermal conductivity between the carrier gas and the component. For the analysis of H2 and He, argon is used as the carrier. Helium is used for all the other gases, such as N2 and O2. Detection limits using a thermal conductivity detector are typically 0.01% by volume (19A08). Gas samples can be analyzed by MS via a gas inlet port on the mass spectrometer. Methods for the determination of fixed gases in cigarette smoke have been reported by Routh (19A06) and Reynolds and Wheeler (3120). There are several methods for the analysis of the major variable gases from tobacco smoke, for example, CO, CO2, NO, NO2, HCN, and NH3. The current standard methods approved by the ISO, FTC, and Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA) for the determination of the variable gases are described by Counts et al. along with analytical results from a recent worldwide market sample of cigarette brands (19A02, 19A03).
XIX.A.1 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) CO2 is a major vapor-phase MSS component exceeded only by N2. Its concentration is about 10% of the weight of the whole tobacco smoke (4145), similar to that of O2. The concentration of CO is next highest, being about 4% (4145). The ratio of CO2 to CO is considered to be an index (3482) of the combustibility of tobacco. The currently approved methods for the determination of CO are ISO Standard Methods 3308, 3402, 4387, 8454, 10315, and 10362-1. In these methods, CO is determined by non-dispersion infrared (NDIR) spectroscopy (19A02). Historically, GC (474, 2123, 2662, 4145) and NDIR spectroscopic analysis (781, 782, 4251, 4252) have generally been the preferred methods for analysis of CO2 and CO in MSS, but an electrochemical transducer (ECT) method (447) has also been used for the analysis of CO, in which the electrochemical reaction during oxidation by catalysis is converted to electrical signals. Sample treatments before GC or NDIR
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
analyses, such as oxidation (474, 4145) of CO to CO2 with iodine pentoxide, reduction (2123, 2124) of CO to CH4 with a Ni catalyst, and separation (2634) by lowering the column temperature to -70°C have also been studied. Gas chromatography (2662) with 5 Å molecular sieves as the packing materials has also been employed. The levels of both CO2 and CO in smoke increase (4251) as the number of puffs increases. The amounts of these combustion gases produced in the early puffs of a cigarette are lower than those analyzed at the end of a cigarette during smoking (4251, 4252). The relationship to the length of the cigarette is such that the concentrations of these components in the vapor phase decrease (3881, 3883) with increasing length, and this can be explained by the reduction in the amount of tobacco burnt and diffusion of CO from the wrapper during smoking (19A05). Tobacco quality is an important factor in terms of the amount of CO and CO2 produced during cigarette combustion. The amount of CO produced (474, 3088) is greater for low- to mediumgrade tobaccos, and the amount of CO2 increases (474) as tobacco quality becomes higher. Experiments with 18O as the source of atmospheric oxygen indicated that more than 50% of the oxygen atoms in the CO2 and CO molecules come from the atmosphere (1884).
XIX.A.2 Nitrogen Oxides (NO, NO2, N2O, NOx) NOx in tobacco smoke has been quantified by calorimetric analyses (189, 3441, 3720), such as the Saltzman method (19A07), and by the chemical emission method (2122), which has been shown to be a rapid method for quantification (1884). Most of the NOx present in fresh MSS is NO, only a small amount of NO2 is present (189, 816, 2803). The concentration of NO2 in MSS increases (189, 2803, 3691) with the age of the smoke, and can reach levels of 200 ppm after 60 seconds (189). NO2 formation is believed to result from the auto-oxidation of NO. It has also been suggested that some of the NO2 produced by oxidation is converted (2941, 4058) to methyl nitrite through a reaction with methanol in the smoke (1884). Predominate precursors of NO are nitrates (189) and other N-containing compounds in the tobacco. N2O (2941) and HNO3 (4058) have also been reported as components of MSS in addition to the above compounds (1884). The currently preferred method for the determination of NOx is chemiluminescence (1930, 19A02).
XIX.A.3 Hydrogen Cyanide (HCN) HCN in smoke has been analyzed by colorimetry (110, 779, 780, 3088), by the ion selective electrode method (3482), and by gas chromatography (513). An analysis of HCN in tobacco smoke by Vickroy and Gaunt (4053) illustrated that HCN can vary from 144 to 351 µg/cigarette depending on the brand of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 896
11/13/08 5:43:21 PM
Fixed and Variable Gases
cigarettes. The concentration of HCN in MSS increases (110) with puff number similar to other MSS components. HCN is present in both the vapor phase and the particulate phase of MSS (110). Considerable amounts of HCN have also been found in cigarette butts (110, 779, 780). Today, the preferred method for the determination of HCN in the vapor and particulate phase of MSS is colorimetry. HCN is converted to cyanogen chloride, treated with pyridine, and complexed with diethyl acetone dicarboxylate (779, 780, 3145). Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) found that tobacco smoke contains cyanogen and that up to about 5% of the HCN analyzed was produced by conversion of HCN to cyanogen during analysis (1884).
XIX.A.4 Ammonia (NH3) The preferred method for the determination of NH3 in MSS is currently ion exchange chromatography (IEC) (2681a, 19A02). In this method, NH3 is collected from Cambridge pads and sulfuric acid traps and then analyzed by IEC (19A02). Previous methods for the analysis of NH3 in MSS, such as titration and colorimetry, suffered from interferences (2724, 2787, 19A01.), principally low-boiling amines. Quantification of NH3 by means of selective electrodes (3693) has been attempted, but the results were affected (475) by methylamine. Gas chromatography (129, 475, 2541) has also been employed with good results, since the effects of the presence of other substances
897
can be substantially reduced. Early methods for the determination of NH3 involved trapping MSS in an aqueous acidic solution. The trapped MSS solution was then steam distilled under alkaline condition to obtain the sample for analysis. It was discovered that this early method produced extra NH3 (30% to 80%) during the steam distillation procedure (475, 1884). NH3 collected from MSS should be analyzed directly to achieve accurate quantification (1884). Cigarette blends with higher levels of nitrogen, such as blends high in burley tobacco, tend to have higher yields of MSS NH3. The yield of NH3 in MSS is known to vary with the permeability of the cigarette wrappers, when cigarettes were tested with comparable blends (475). The amount of NH3 produced was greater for wrappers with higher air permeability. The rate of formation of NH3 depended strongly on temperature. The yield of NH3 increased with decreasing temperature (1884). Therefore, it was thought that variations in the burning temperature resulting from differences in wrapper quality or its air permeability determined the amount of NH3 produced (1884). Table XIX-5 is a catalog of the fixed and variable gases in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. The catalog contains only thirty-five entries. This number of entries represents a very small fraction of the total number of identified components in tobacco and tobacco smoke but amazingly the weight contributed by fixed and variable gases represents about 90% of the whole smoke from a cigarette.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 897
11/13/08 5:43:22 PM
898
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIX-5 Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke (,"+1&(%#'#,+,"(&)('',#',# ##',((+-+,#,-,+&($/+'(, Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa. ,,#',((+&($(*.#.*+ (
*'+
&)*(%%,#.'0
((
(( +-+,#,-, +&($
((+&($
&&('#
*!(' *
*(' *
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 898
11/13/08 5:43:24 PM
899
Fixed and Variable Gases
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke %
'$(
#&'%"") +$,
'%$ %,
'%$ (*"
%%
%% (*() )*) (#%!
%%(#%!
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 899
11/13/08 5:43:25 PM
900
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke $
&#'
"%&$!!(*#+
&$#"$#$+
$$'"$
$$
$$ ')'(()( '"$
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 900
11/13/08 5:43:27 PM
901
Fixed and Variable Gases
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke )
! + ( ,
' * +)&& -$/ ( 0
)),')%
)) ,.,-$-.- ,')%
))
+)( ')()0$
#&)+$( &
+)()0$ ,.&!$ 3+)(1&,.&!$ 4
+)()01#&)+$ &
3*#)," ( 4
+)(,.&!$
+)( $)0$
-#( $($-+$& &.)+$(
1+2$(
31()" (4
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 901
11/13/08 5:43:29 PM
902
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &
(%)
$'(#*!,%-
&&)$&"
&&
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
.(&%
.(&%)+#!
&!%
.(&.%!! / .(&%.%!0
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 902
11/13/08 5:43:30 PM
903
Fixed and Variable Gases
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke '
)&*
%()'$$+"-&.
''*%'#
'' *,*+"+,+ *%'#
''
"+)'!&'."
"+)'!&'."
0&"+)',*'."1
"+)'!&'."
0&"+)"'."1
"+)'!&'."
0&"+)'!&"'."1
*'/&""
"+)'!&
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 903
11/13/08 5:43:31 PM
904
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke )
! + ( ,
' * +)&& -$/ ( 0
)),')%
)) ,.,-$-.- ,')%
))
01" (
#),*#$(
)( (
)($,)-)* )!',,
(
.&!.+$)0$
.&!.+-+$)0$
#$)1($$
#$)1()" (
$-+)" ()0$ , 0
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 904
11/13/08 5:43:31 PM
905
Fixed and Variable Gases
Table XIX-5 (continued) Fixed and Variable Gases in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &
$'(#*!,%-
*(
(%)
&&
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
&&)$&"
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C019.indd 905
11/13/08 5:43:32 PM
20
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
XX.A Elements, Isotopes, and Ions in Plants Plants require numerous nutrients and compounds to sustain life. There are at least twenty elements that are used by plants that are considered essential for growth and reproduction (20A06, 20A10). For higher plants (such as tobacco) a significantly higher number of other elements are needed. Justus von Liebig (1803–1873) in the mid-nineteenth century stated that nutrients are essential for plant life: We have determined that a number of elements are absolutely essential to plant life. They are essential because a plant deprived of any one of these elements would cease to exist (20A58).
Von Liebig (20A58) taught of the absolute need to provide plants with essential minerals necessary for successful agricultural production. If the soil is not replenished with these essential elements and associated ions, plant yields decrease and numerous plant diseases occur. Healthy plants require and thus contain a great variety of elements, isotopes, and ions. In general, significant efforts are normally exerted to maintain a plant’s requirement for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) through fertilization, while taking for granted its basic need for carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O). Knowing the nutrients required to grow plants is only one aspect of successful crop production. Optimum plant yield also requires knowing the rate to apply, the method and time of application, the source of nutrients to use, and how the elements are influenced by soil and climatic conditions. The primary nutrients — N, P, and K — are commonly found in blended fertilizers, for example, 10-10-10, or equivalent grades. Primary nutrients are utilized in the largest amounts by crops and, therefore, are applied at higher rates than secondary nutrients and micronutrients. The secondary nutrients; calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) are required in smaller amounts than the primary nutrients. The major source for supplementing the soil with Ca and Mg is dolomitic lime, although these nutrients are also available from a variety of fertilizer sources. Sulfur is available in fertilizers in the form of potassium and magnesium sulfate, gypsum (calcium sulfate), and elemental sulfur. Micronutrients; iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), boron (B), and molybdenum (Mo) are required in even smaller amounts than secondary nutrients. They are available in manganese, zinc and copper sulfates, oxides, oxy-sulfates and chelates, as well as in boric acid and ammonium molybdate. Table XX-1 gives the elemental composition of a typical plant. It is interesting to note that about 96% of the makeup of a plant is C, H, and O. These elements come from carbon
dioxide and water. The carbon dioxide in the atmosphere contributes the C and O found in plants. It is taken up by plants through small pores located in the leaves. Water, on the other hand, is taken up by the roots of plants and is responsible for contributing only H to the makeup of a plant. However, the H used to produce water also comes from the atmosphere. Table XX-1 also shows the classification of the elements in plants. The elements are classified as structural elements, primary and secondary nutrients, and micronutrients. Therefore, the atmosphere and sun provide about 96% of the necessary ingredients for plant growth; and minerals provide about 4% of the necessary ingredients for plant growth (20A10). The elemental composition in Table XX-1 of a typical plant is nearly identical with the elemental composition of tobacco, with the exception that tobacco generally has a slightly higher N level. Elemental analyses for C, H, and N in tobacco indicate that there is about 5% N in dry tobacco (2798, 20A06, 20A10). The percent C, H, and O (by difference) of dry tobacco leaf are about 43%, 6%, and 43%, respectively (2798, 20A06, 20A10), with the remainder being trace levels of metals and nonmetals (3973).
XX.A.1 Elements, Isotopes, and Ions in Tobacco As of 2007, the periodic table contains 117 elements whose discoveries have been confirmed. Ninety are found naturally on Earth, and the rest are synthetic elements that have been produced artificially in particle accelerators. Of these ninety naturally occurring elements, nearly eighty have been identified in tobacco. Additionally, forty-four isotopes and twenty-four ions have been identified in tobacco. Tobacco is undoubtedly one of the plant materials most thoroughly evaluated for metal content. It should be noted that the omission of information about other microelements does not necessarily imply the absence of these elements in tobacco, but rather a lack of information (3973). The discovery of elements, isotopes, and ions in tobacco (and for that matter tobacco smoke) has only been limited by the discovery and advancement of new analytical techniques. Over the years, numerous scientific articles, reviews, and books have been published that catalog the elements, ions, and isotopes found in tobacco. One of the earliest articles on the identification of metals in tobacco was published by Grandeau in 1862 (20A25) on the identification of rubidium (Rb) and cesium (Cs) in tobacco. Although it was well known in the 1860s that numerous metals and nonmetals existed in tobacco and higher plants (20A58), analytical techniques to isolate the small levels of metals were not established. A 1934 bibliography by Heffer and Sons (20A26) reviewed literature 907
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 907
11/24/08 12:35:13 PM
908
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-1 Elemental Composition of a Typical Plant (1127b, 20A10) Element
Symbol
Percent of Wet Weight
Percent of Dry Weight
Oxygen Carbon Hydrogen
O C H
81.0 6.8 11.5
45.0 44.5 6.0
Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium
N P K
0.2 0.03 0.15
1.5 0.2 1.0
Primary nutrients
Calcium Magnesium Sulfur
Ca Mg S
0.05 0.03 0.02
0.35 0.20 0.15
Secondary nutrients
Chlorine Iron Molybdenum Zinc Boron Copper Others
Cl Fe Mo Zn B Cu
0.015 0.015 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.175
0.10 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.80
citations for 1921 to 1933 on antimony (Sb), bismuth (Bi), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), cobalt (Co), Cu, lead (Pb), Mn, mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), thallium (Tl), tin (Sn), and Zn. Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) published their review of chemical constituents of tobacco and tobacco smoke in 1959. In 1966, Tso (20A105) published an excellent historical review of elements identified in tobacco to that date. Stedman (3797), in his 1968 review, listed aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), Cu, Cr, Co, iron (Fe), Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, titanium (Ti), vanadium (V), and Zn as identified elements in tobacco and smoke. In 1974, Elliot (1127b) reviewed the nutritional requirements of tobacco, including metals and metal ions, and Franzke et al. (1227) published their investigation of the heavy metals in tobacco. In 1977, Norman (2799a) reviewed the subject of metals in tobacco at the Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference (TCRC). The most recent review, in 1996, by Jones and Wilkinson (20A54), concerning historical agronomic achievements in tobacco science, provided current information on elements identified in tobacco. The most prolific writer on elements, isotopes, and ions in tobacco is Tso. From his 1966 review of the subject to his 1972 book on the physiology and biochemistry of tobacco plants (3972) and his 1990 book (3973) on the production, physiology, and biochemistry of the tobacco plant, Tso has continuously provided tobacco scientists with valuable information. His 1990 book (3973) devoted three chapters to metals, isotopes, and ions in tobacco. In Chapters 17 and 19 (3973), Tso discussed the presence, physiology, and biochemistry of the following elements in tobacco plants: Al, As, barium (Ba), beryllium (Be), bismuth (Bi), B, bromine (Br), Cd, cerium (Ce), cesium (Cs), chlorine (Cl), Cr, Co, Cu, dysprosium (Dy), erbium (Er), fluorine (F), gadolinium (Gd), germanium (Ge), gold (Au), hafnium (Hf), holmium (Ho), indium (In), iodine (I), iridium (Ir), Fe, lanthanum (La), Pb, lithium (Li), magnesium (Mg),
Descriptor Essential structural elements available from air and water
Micronutrients
Mn, Hg, Mo, neodymium (Nd), Ni, N, osmium (Os), palladium (Pd), P, platinum (Pt), polonium (Po), K, praseodymium (Pr), radium (Ra), rhenium (Re), rhodium (Rh), rubidium (Rb), ruthenium (Ru), samarium (Sm), scandium (Sc), selenium (Se), silicon (Si), silver (Ag), sodium (Na), strontium (Sr), sulfur (S), tantalum (Ta), tellurium (Te), terbium (Tb), TI, thorium (Th), thulium (Tm), Sn, Ti, tungsten (W), uranium (U), V, ytterbium (Yb), Zn, and zirconium (Zr). As Tso stated (3973), “No attempt is made to include all publications about each element; in fact, some papers were eliminated intentionally to avoid duplication.” Tso (3973) estimated that tens of thousands of article have been written on the production, physiology, and biochemistry of the tobacco plant. In Chapter 18 (3973), Tso discussed radiochemical elements in tobacco and smoke and in Chapter 19 he discussed the physiological disorders in tobacco plants associated with deficiencies in minerals and micronutrients. Tobacco plants, like other higher plants, are autotrophs possessing the capacity to synthesize all of its complex organic materials provided that carbon dioxide, water, minerals, and the proper physical environment are available. Their chemical composition is influenced by environmental factors such as light, temperature, moisture, soil type, and cultural practices, as well as inorganic nutrition. The inorganic requirements of tobacco were considered in the 1962 book by Sutcliffe (20A101) and in reviews by Steinberg and Tso (20A98) and others, for example, McMurtrey (20A66). The essential elements of tobacco may be grouped into categories depending on their source and the relative amounts required. C, H, and O are considered structural elements and are grouped separately because they are derived from air or water. Obviously, C, H, and O are found in the vast number of the organic components identified in tobacco. Evans and Russell (20A20) described the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 908
11/24/08 12:35:13 PM
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
requirements for these elements that were established when early investigators determined the basic chemical composition of tobacco matter and elucidated the essential nature of the respiratory and photosynthetic processes that occur in plants. Another group of elements referred to as primary nutrients include P, K, N, S, Ca, and Mg. These elements also make up a relatively large portion of the inorganic components of tobacco tissues and were established to be essential by plant physiologists such as Knop, Nobbe, and Sachs (20A101) prior to 1910. In this period, reagent chemicals were exceedingly crude and contained many of the essential trace elements that were being investigated. As a consequence, the proof of many trace elements in tobacco could not be established until chemists learned how to purify the analytical reagents for testing. Another group of elements, including B, Cl, Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, and Zn, occur in exceedingly small concentrations in plant materials and are referred to as micronutrient elements. Fe was shown to be essential by Sachs (20A101) prior to 1910, but the other trace elements were demonstrated to be essential only after 1920 (20A20). During the period 1923 to 1931, Sommer and Lipman (20A96) established that a variety of plants including tobacco required Zn and Cu. During the same period, Warrington (20A111) in England demonstrated that boron was a required in micronutrient in broad beans. Since then, it has become clear that these elements are needed for a variety of species, including tobacco. In 1939, Arnon and Stout (20A05) demonstrated that tomato plants required Mo and since then it has become apparent that all species need this element for metabolism (20A20). The biochemical role of minerals in metabolic processes of various organisms has been covered in several reviews by Malstrom and Neilands (20A60), McElroy and Nason (20A65), Nason and McElroy (20A81), and Nicholas (20A84). The function of C, H, and O are obvious since they are constituents of fats, carbohydrates, and proteins. N and S are constituents of amino acids, proteins, coenzymes, and other compounds. Ca forms a complex with pectic acid and functions as a constituent of the middle lamella of cell walls. Dixon and Webb (20A13) showed that Ca also plays a role as a cofactor for certain adenosine triphosphate hydrolyzing enzymes, for phospholipases, and as a cofactor for the amylases from a variety of plants. Many elements, especially the cations, play essential roles as cofactors for the enzymes of various metabolic sequences. Tso (3973) provided numerous examples in which mineral deficiency such as Fe or Mo resulted in metabolic lesions that have been satisfactorily interpreted on the basis of detailed knowledge of the biochemical role of metals in enzymes of important metabolic pathways. This biochemical approach to plant nutrition problems has proved exceedingly valuable to plant scientists and agricultural producers in terms of identifying diseases and finding solutions to improve crop yields. Today, an enormous amount of work is being undertaken to understand the total genome of tobacco (429b, 429c). Detailed analyses of the metabolic pathways, enzymes involved, and
909
feed-back control and gene repressor mechanisms, including the metal and nonmetal elements and ions, as essential catalysts in tobacco, are being thoroughly documented (429b, 429c). Mineral ions participate in a wide variety of metabolic processes, electron transport mechanisms, and in nitrate reduction. By manipulation of the level of inorganic elements and ions in the nutrient medium, it is possible to influence the constituents in plants. For over 100 years, tobacco scientists have employed a fundamental research approach in attempts to understand the complex physiology and biochemistry of tobacco involved in the biosynthesis of compounds in tobacco (3973). Their efforts have greatly improved the economics of tobacco production and have led to advancements in understanding of health issues associated with tobacco and its various commercial uses (20A20). Inorganic ions play a very important role in tobacco metabolism (20A20). There are various sites where inorganic ions, for example, Ca2+, Mn2+, Mg2+, PO43-, Zn2+, and K1+, participate in glycolytic reactions. Phosphate participates in a majority of the reactions as a component of sugar-phosphate compounds. Phosphate also functions as an important component of coenzymes such as uridine diphosphate-glucose, di- and triphosphopyridine nucleotides, adenosine di- and triphosphate, etc. Practically every reaction in which phosphate is transferred requires Mg as a cofactor, but most of these enzymes are not highly specific for a divalent cation activator and will respond to other cations such as Mn (2489). Another interesting aspect of the glycolytic enzymes is that Zn is required for alcohol dehydrogenase, lactic acid dehydrogenase, aldolase, and triosephosphate dehydrogenase. The role of Zn as an important inorganic ion, as a bound component of dehydrogenases and other enzymes, has been discussed in detail by Vallee (20A110). K ion is a cofactor for the aldolase reaction. Pyruvic kinase from all known sources also requires univalent cations, in addition to a divalent cation. This enzyme needs K, ammonium, or Rb ions as a cofactor. Mg ions serve an important function in photosynthetic processes in tobacco as it is an essential constituent of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b. Some heavy metal and nonmetal ions are toxic to tobacco and can serve as metabolic inhibitors. The toxicity of fluoride, for example, is explained in part on the basis of the formation of a magnesium-fluorphosphate complex that inhibits the enolase reaction in glycolysis. Other enzymes are inhibited by substrate analogs, sulfhydryl complexing agents, and metal chelating agents. Several cations function as essential cofactors for enzymes of the citric acid cycle. Magnesium is necessary for the pyruvic acid oxidase complex and ferrous iron is necessary for the activity of aconitase from certain sources (20A20). The isocitric dehydrogenase system which catalyzes a dehydrogenation of isocitric acid and also the decarboxylation of oxalosuccinate to yield α-ketoglutarate requires Mn for the decarboxylation step (20A03). Mg is a necessary cofactor for the α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex and Fe is a cofactor for succinate dehydrogenase (20A19, 20A64, 20A65, 20A80, 20A84). There are numerous cofactors
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 909
11/24/08 12:35:13 PM
910
(Fe2+, -SH compounds, Mn2+, Mg2+, PO43-) and inhibitors (SCN1-, Br1-, I1-, Cl1-, Na1+, Cu2+, Hg2+, and CN1-) of citric acid cycle enzymes in tobacco. It is apparent that the various enzymes not only require cations but are inhibited by substrate analogs, substrate competitors, heavy metals, and sulfhydryl complexing agents (20A20). Mineral ions play important roles in the electron transport portion of the terminal respiratory process in tobacco. In this process, nonheme iron serves an important function in the electron transfer process. There is also convincing evidence that Cu ion is important in the process (20A20). Mineral ions also play an important role in the electron transport processes of the initial reactions of photosynthesis. In the photosynthetic processes of tobacco Fe, Cu, Mn, and chloride ions are essential to the electron transfer processes (20A20). Metal ions play an important role in nitrate reduction. The discovery and characterization of the pyridine nucleotide enzymes involved in nitrate reduction (20A18, 20A65, 20A81, 20A83) made it possible to understand the role of mineral ions in the nitrate reduction processes. Reduced pyridine nucleotides and flavin adenine dinucleotide function as cofactors in reduction of nitrate, nitrite, hyponitrate, and hydroxylamine. The first step of the reaction involves the reduction of nitrate to nitrite, and Mo is essential for this reaction. The reduction of nitrite to hyponitrite and hyponitrite to hydroxylamine requires Cu and Fe ions (20A20). Many types of tobacco contain radioactive elements such as 226Ra and 210Po at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 0.47 pCi/g (1742, 2815, 3982, 3983). Phosphate fertilizers are the major source of these radioelements (3982, 3983); minor contributions come from airborne particles carrying 210Pb and 210Po. These particles are trapped by the trichomes on the undersides of the tobacco leaves (2467) and were first reported by Nystrom and Bellin (2815) in 1964. The 1999 CORESTA monograph on tobacco (910a) pointed out that trace elements and metal ions can have a profound effect on tobacco quality. Iron, for example, has been implicated in the speckling effects which develop in “grey tobacco” deficiency of Virginia tobacco (2338). Al is associated with development of the black color of cured tobacco, or so-called “black tobacco” (20A57). Tso (3973) devoted an entire chapter in his 1990 book to a discussion on the absolute need for trace elements in tobacco disease prevention (3973, 20A106). Although concentrations of most of these metals are not very high in tobacco (usually well below percent levels, typically in the low to middle ppm range) many of these elements are extremely important to the health of the plant. Trace levels of metals (Mn, Fe, etc.) in tobacco are important as quality factors as they can affect the combustibility and smolder rate of tobacco. Some of the metals in tobacco are desirable as quality factors while others are not (Cd, Pb, Cr) as they have been associated with human health concerns (20A100). The type and amount of certain inorganic ions are also important factors in determining the burn and smolder properties of tobacco. Peterson and Tibbitts (20A86) found that the concentrations of K1+, Cl1-, SO42+, S2-, Mg2+, and NO31- in tobacco (in descending order of importance) account
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
for 80% of the variation in leaf combustibility and smolder (4332). Tobacco is probably the most frequently examined plant in the study of microelements. Many microelements are important for normal tobacco growth and development (3973). However, the specific roles of some of these elements are still not well understood. Frequently the presence of certain microelements is merely a result of the circumstances of site, season, or species, and therefore may not bear any physiological or agronomic significance. Tobacco plants are widely distributed in various locations of the world under different climatic, soil, and culture conditions. Any report of a certain microelement regarding its level, distribution, and fertilizer and soil requirements may or may not be applicable to that particular element under different circumstances. In 1986, Isakander et al. (20A47) determined twenty-eight elements were in American cigarette tobacco. Today, nearly 150 elements, ions, and isotopes have been identified in tobacco.
XX.A.2 Elements, Isotopes, and Ions in Tobacco Smoke In 1954, Kosak (2170) published a list of components reported to be present in tobacco smoke. His list included “Inorganic Components.” The inorganic compounds included ammonia, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, thiocyanic acid (?), oxygen, arsenic (probably present as As2O3.), “acetates” (?), “chlorides” (?), “cyanides” (?), and “nitrates” (?). The question marks in Kosak’s publication indicated that he did not consider the evidence in the literature to be definitive proof of the identity of the component. Since then, a tremendous amount of research has been conducted and published on metals and ions in tobacco smoke. During the late 1950s, Cogbill and Hobbs (769) conducted pioneering work on elements found in tobacco smoke. Two reviews in 1959 by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) and Bentley and Berry (282) documented elements found in tobacco smoke. During the late 1960s and throughout the 1970s, a tremendous amount of research was published by the Martin Brinkman Co. (2468), Celanese Fiber Marketing Co. (641), Nadkarni (2666, 20A70), Nadkarni et al. (2667, 20A71–20A79), Morie and Morrisett (2633), Jenkins (20A49), Franzke et al. (1227), John (2052), Allen and Vickroy (50), and Perinelli and Carugno (2929) on elements, isotopes, and ions in tobacco smoke. Concurrently, scientists within the tobacco industry were conducting research on metals in tobacco smoke. Much of this work was reviewed by Jenkins of Philip Morris in 1990 on the uses of nuclear radiation in tobacco and smoke research (1933). At present, eighty metal and nonmetal elements, twentyfour isotopes, and twelve ions have been identified in tobacco smoke by numerous classical and instrumental analytical techniques. It is an amazing achievement that nearly 90% of the naturally occurring elements have now been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Although numerous ions in tobacco were known, research on their identity in tobacco smoke was not established until the advent of commercial application of ion
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 910
11/24/08 12:35:13 PM
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
chromatography in the late 1980s. Since then many laboratories have gathered extensive experience in the application of ion chromatography (IC) for the analysis of inorganic and organic anions, in both tobacco and tobacco smoke (250, 1273, 2931, 3160, 20A16, 20A17, 20A59, 20A85, 20A114). The presence of radioactivity, both α- and β-particles, in leaf and tobacco smoke has been reported in many publications. At earlier periods, the main concern was for β-activity found in cigars, cigarettes, and tobacco ash (113, 2657, 3367, 20A97). The α-emitting radioactive isotopes were suggested to be significant because of health concerns to smokers. The total α-activity in tobacco varies widely in green leaf, cured leaf tobacco, and tobacco smoke (2466, 3367, 3973). A very minor amount of 210Po is transferred into the mainstream smoke (MSS). Twenty-four isotopes have been identified in tobacco smoke. The discovery of elements, isotopes, and ions in tobacco smoke has only been limited by the discovery and advancement of new analytical techniques.
XX.B Methods for the Detection and Identification of Metals, Ions, and Isotopes in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Numerous analytical techniques with a variety of different methodologies have been employed for the analysis of metals, nonmetals, isotopes, and ions in tobacco and tobacco smoke and various other types of organic matter. The subject of the choice of analytical methodology best suited for the detection of elements, isotopes, and ions in different matter has been reviewed by Fassel (20A21), Bock (20A08), Jones and Case (20A53), Jenkins (1933), Ivanova et al. (20A48), Thompson et al. (20A103), Sigg et al. (20A94), and Jimoh (20A51). The analytical methods included classical microanalytical determination (wet methods), colorimetric determinations, various atomic absorption spectrophotometric techniques, such as classical atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS, with single or multiple element capability), cold vapor atomic absorption (CVAA), argon-supported inductively coupled plasmas (ICP), ICP with atomization-excitation processing, graphite furnace (GF), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS, with or without Zeeman background correction), GF-AAS with deuterium lamp; inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), microwave digestion, X-ray emission, competitive ligand-exchange/stripping voltammetry (CLE-SV), diffusion gradients through thin films (DGT), instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), ion chromatography (IC), and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Hyphenated techniques are also becoming popular, such as inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and IC-ICP-MS (20A51). The selection of the appropriate method depends on several factors, such as the kind of equipment available, the ease of digestion, the kind of sample, elements of interest, fume removal, contamination considerations, matrix effects, and necessary safety precautions (20A08, 20A53, 20A103).
911
The inorganic components of tobacco and tobacco smoke have been determined by microanalytical techniques, classical colorimetric determinations, and modern instrumental methods. For example, Cogbill and Hobbs (769) described several colorimetric methods for the determination of metals in tobacco smoke. X-ray emission spectroscopy has been used in the determination of metals and metal isotopes in tobacco and tobacco smoke. (20A62). Atomic absorption spectroscopy is widely used and is one of the most established methods for the determination of metals in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Although quite reliable, AAS can require separate analyses and recalibrations at varying ranges for each element, with a separate lamp for each analyte (dependent on the type of AAS equipment). Concurrent determination of multiple metals is possible, while speciation is often lacking in this method. The determination of metals in tobacco smoke is often more complicated. One reason for this difficulty is the conversion of smoke samples to homogeneous solutions so that they can pass through the aspirator of the instrument. Another is that for the determination of the ultratrace quantities of metals in cigarette smoke, a preconcentration step is often required. Solvent extraction is the method of preconcentration preferred over most other methods. The choice of solvents that can provide a high degree of selectivity over a broad pH range is limited. Alternately, metal complexes that are relatively insensitive to pH changes, for example, ammonium pyrrolidinecarbodithioate, have been used successfully for a wide variety of metals (2633) in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The work of Morie and Morrisett (2633) on the use of AAS in the determination of metals in tobacco smoke serves as an excellent example. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) and mass spectrometric (ICP-MS) techniques are modern, sophisticated, very sensitive, and generally quite expensive. These methods have been used successfully for the determination of metals in tobacco and tobacco smoke (20A90, 20A112). The success of these two methods can be affected by the metal-solvent matrix employed. In many cases preseparation procedures and other special handling techniques are required. Each method for analysis of metals in tobacco and tobacco smoke has its own advantages and challenges. Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is an extremely sensitive method for the determination of metals and metal isotopes. INAA has been used successfully by Nadkarni et al. (20A73), Jenkins et al. (1934) and Kubota (2214) to determine numerous inorganic constituents (elements and several elemental isotopes) in both tobacco and tobacco smoke (1933). The use of INAA for tobacco and tobacco smoke analysis has been accepted worldwide (1933). Tobacco is ideally suited for INAA because of its large abundance and variety of inorganic components. Tobacco is a readily available, easy-to-handle solid, it produces little gas during irradiation, and is rapidly assayed by INAA. The literature on the use of INAA in tobacco is very large because tobacco is often used as a model in non-tobacco-oriented
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 911
11/24/08 12:35:13 PM
912
reactor facilities systems for INAA (1933). However, the applicability of neutron activation analyses (INAA) is limited by the availability and cost of the necessary equipment. INAA requires a neutron flux source and gamma-ray counting facilities. The most conventional laboratories are thus unlikely to pursue this approach. Further, some elements are normally not determinable by INAA (Pb and Ni), either because of low sensitivity or strong interferences from other metals [Perini (20A85)]. Jenkins (1933) noted that despite the wide-spread use of INAA for tobacco and smoke analysis, meaningful intercomparison of the INAA results published in the literature is difficult as there is a lack of descriptive experimental information on the exact types of the tobaccos or tobacco smoke tested. Many laboratories studied only tobaccos and tobacco smoke native to their own country. Many laboratories have gathered extensive experience in the application of ion chromatography (IC) for the analysis of inorganic and organic anions. Small carboxylate anions, Groups IA and IIA cations, and heavy metal ions have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke by this method. Several of these applications have been presented as tobacco journal (250) and tobacco conference [TCRC (2951), TSRC(1273)] papers. At the 1999 TSRC, Perini (20A85) presented a method associated with IC called transition metal IC (TMIC). TMIC can be used for specific resolution and speciation of transition metal ions in tobacco and related matrices. Perini showed that TMIC could be used to detect and speciate at least nineteen transition metal ion.
XX.C The Transference of Elements, Isotopes, and Ions from Tobacco to Tobacco Smoke Nearly all trace metals in tobacco transfer at some small level into tobacco smoke. The transfer of metals from tobacco into MSS and sidestream smoke (SSS) has been of interest for a number of years (2133, 3836–3838, 2530). Transfer of metals from filters containing metal catalysts has also been of interest as they were thought to be a source of metals entrained into the MSS (2633). For example, experimental filters with permanganate salts (20A104) and hopcalite (20A69) have been reported to remove nitrogen oxides from smoke. The percent transfer rate of metals in tobacco to tobacco smoke varies greatly but generally falls within a 0.002% to 7.0% range (20A91), although percentages as high as 19% have been reported for Sb (2666). Numerous researchers have addressed the question of metal transference employing a variety of different cigarette types, collection devices, and analytical techniques. Depending on the metal or metals of interest, the method used, and the cigarette type, the reported results cover a wide range of values. In some cases the range covers several orders of magnitude. For one to draw any significant conclusions from this mass of data would be tenuous. Some of the inadequacies associated with diversity of transfer rate reported by Morgan and Akers (20A68) are:
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
• Tobacco types or blends of tobaccos were often not identified, and in most cases tobacco filler types were not processed in a standard fashion. • Cigarette configurations were often varied and in many cases the cigarette configuration and materials used to construct the cigarette were not mentioned. • Often only one or two metal species were studied for a particular tobacco. • Total particulate matter (TPM) collection procedures were not uniform among studies. • Analytical methods varied widely and were often not calibrated against standard materials of known metal content. • Large analytical errors were often tolerated to obtain a numerical value. Stöber (20A99), in his review of the generation, size distribution, and composition of tobacco smoke aerosols, made the observation that more than one mechanism for the transport of metals into MSS is operative. The predominant mechanism is entrainment of small particulate matter. For the more volatile elements, however, vaporization followed by condensation into the particulate phase appears dominant. The rate of metal transfer to the smoke is dependent on the volatility, the temperature profiles in the burning cigarette, and the filter type. In cigarette smoke, element concentrations vary among brands and even within the same brand. Numerous factors influence the metal concentration found in tobacco, including soil type and pH, the atmosphere, genotype, stalk position, application of metal-containing fertilizers or agricultural chemicals, for example, herbicides and pesticides (3973). These same factors affect the concentration of elements transferred to MSS and SSS. Table XX-2 lists the percent transfer of selected metallic and nonmetallic elements between tobacco and tobacco MSS.
XX.C.1 Elements in Tobacco Smoke of Special Interest Eighty elements, twenty-four isotopes, and twelve ions have been identified in tobacco smoke. Table XX-2 contains data on the percent transfer of selected elements into tobacco smoke. Based on literature data, small portions, at most a few percent of the metals and nonmetals, transfer from the tobacco into the smoke. The predominant route of exposure of humans to metals in cigarette smoke is inhalation. The smoker will likely inhale both the mainstream vapor and particulate phase of the smoke, plus some of the smoke that is generated while the cigarette is smoldering between puffs (20A50). Nonsmokers may also be exposed to metals in cigarette smoke, through passive inhalation of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), but these concentrations are hundreds of times more dilute (3257). Among the metals that transfer into the smoke and are thus inhaled, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1870) considered As, Be, Cr, Ni, and Cd as
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 912
11/24/08 12:35:13 PM
913
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
Table XX-2 Percent Transfer of Selected Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Transference to Smoke (%)
Reference
7429-90-5 7440-36-0 7440-38-2 7440-41-7 7726-95-6 7440-43-9 7440-70-2 7440-45-1 7440-46-2 7782-50-5 7440-47-3 7440-48-4 7440-50-8 7440-57-5 7439-89-6 7439-91-0 7439-92-1 7439-95-4 7439-96-5 7440-02-0 7440-09-7 7440-17-7 7440-19-9 7440-20-2 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 7440-23-5 7440-66-6
Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Bromine Cadmium Calcium Cerium Cesium Chlorine Chromium Cobalt Copper Gold Iron Lanthanum Lead Magnesium Manganese Nickel Potassium Rubidium Samarium Scandium Selenium Silver Sodium Zinc
0.009-0.0014 0.003-19 [0.016] a-7.0 0-[4.0] 0.02-2.41 7-22 ND b-0.001 ND 1.27 1.2-2.2 0.43-1.74 0.5-4.2 0.71-1.7 0.002 0.014-1.3 ND-11 0.16-6.3 0.0025 0.004-0.006 <0.1-2.4 0.2-0.51 0.18-0.78 ND 0.018-2.6 2.5-5.2 0.60-1.08 0.25-1.06 0.4-2.7
1934 769, 1934,2666, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68 769, 1934, 2666, 20A21, 20A68, 20A76 3711, 20A68 769, 1933, 1934, 2666, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68 2530, 20A68 769, 1934 1934 2666, 20A21 1933, 1934 769, 2666, 1934, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68 769, 1934, 2666, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68 769, 20A68 2666 769, 1934, 2666, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68 1934, 2666 769, 2530, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68 20A67 769, 1934, 20A67 1934, 2530, 2666, 20A68 769, 20A67 1934 1934 1934, 2666, 20A21 2666, 20A21, 20A68 2666, 20A21 769, 1934 769, 2530, 2666, 20A21, 20A67, 20A68
a b
[ ] = Limit of detection ND= Not Detected
human carcinogens (1742, 20A28, 20A29) in 1985. In 1989, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (4012) listed chromium and lead as possible carcinogenic agents in humans. Additionally, zinc in tobacco smoke has also been a metal of concern (20A49, 20A50). Today, the list of metals classified as Group 1 (human carcinogens) has grown to include As, Be, Cd, Cr6+, Ni, 32P, 239Pu, 240Pu, α- and β-particle emitting radionuclides (in general), 222Rn, 224Ra, 226Ra, 228Ra, and 232Th. Additionally, smokeless tobacco (classified as a Group 1 mixture) and ETS, and tobacco smoke and tobacco smoking (classified as Group 1 exposure circumstances) have been classified by IARC as agents considered carcinogenic to humans (Table XX-3). IARC listed the following agents identified in tobacco smoke as Group 2A (probably carcinogenic to humans) or Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to humans): Pb, Co, Ni, nitrates, and nitrites. Nearly all of the metals and isotopes found in tobacco that transfer to tobacco smoke are a consequence of the use of metals found naturally in the soil (some radionuclides in the soil from nuclear reactions and reactors in the area), use of fertilizer containing metals, or agrochemicals applied to the
tobacco. The radioactive compounds found in highest concentration in cigarette smoke are 210Po and 40K. Other radioactive compounds present include 226Ra, 228Ra, 232Th, and 228Th (1870). As and As compounds and Cr and some chromium compounds are causally associated with cancer in humans, while Ni and Cd and their compounds are probably carcinogenic to humans. As levels in tobacco have been elevated in the past due to the use of arsenical pesticides. Cd levels may be related to the presence of Cd in phosphate fertilizers (1870). Today, the so-called Hoffmann analytes include the following metals, isotopes, and ions: As, Be, Cd, Pb, Cr, Cr6+, Co, Hg, Ni, 210Po, and Se (3300). Despite ample scientific evidence to the contrary many in the scientific community continue to contend that many of the Hoffmann analytes represent a “clear and present danger” to smokers. The following excerpts provide information and comments to the contrary (3300). XX.C.1.a Arsenic (As) Over time, substantial decreases have been reported for As residues on tobacco and dramatic reductions in tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 913
11/24/08 12:35:14 PM
914
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-3 IARC Classification and References to Agents, Groups of Agents, Mixtures and Exposure Circumstances Evaluated by IARC that are Metals, Metallic Compounds, Radioisotopes, or Tobacco or Tobacco SmokeRelated Materials Name
CAS No.
IARC Reference
7440-38-2 7440-41-7 7440-43-9 1333-82-0 1303-00-0 7440-02-0 14596-37-3 15117-48-3 and 14119-33-6
20A42, 20A36 20A27, 20A28 20A27, 20A28 20A32 20A33 20A32 20A41 20A41
Numerous isotopes in tobacco smoke Numerous isotopes in tobacco smoke 13233-32-4 13982-63-3 15262-20-1 10043-92-2 or 14859-67-7 14808-60-7
20A41 20A41 20A41 20A41 20A41 20A37, 20A41 20A39
7440-29-1
20A41
Group 1: Agents and groups of agents: Arsenic Beryllium and beryllium compounds Cadmium and cadmium compounds Chromium (VI) Gallium arsenide Nickel and nickel compounds Phosphorus-32, as phosphate Plutonium-239 and its decay products (may contain plutonium-240 and other isotopes), as aerosols Radionuclides, α-particle-emitting, internally deposited Radionuclides, β-particle-emitting, internally deposited. Radium-224 and its decay products Radium-226 and its decay products Radium-228 and its decay products Radon-222 and its decay products Silica, crystalline (inhaled in the form of quartz or cristobalite from occupational sources) Thorium-232 and its decay products Mixtures: Tobacco, smokeless
20A44, 20A36, 20A40
Exposure circumstances: Involuntary smoking (exposure to secondhand or environmental tobacco smoke, ETS) Tobacco smoking and tobacco smoke
20A45 20A45
Group 2A: Agents and groups of agents: Indium phosphide Lead compounds, inorganic Nitrate or nitrite (ingested) under conditions that result in endogenous nitrosation
22398-80-7 7439-92-1 14797-55-8 and 14797-65-0
Exposure circumstances: Cobalt metal with tungsten carbide
20A33 20A35 20A34
20A33
Group 2B: Agents and groups of agents: Antimony trioxide Carbon black Cobalt and cobalt compounds Cobalt sulfate and other soluble cobalt (II) salts Lead Nickel, metallic and alloys Titanium dioxide Vanadium pentoxide Exposure circumstances: Cobalt metal without tungsten carbide
1309-64-4 1333-86-4 7440-48-4 10026-24-1 7439-92-1 7440-02-0 13463-67-7 1314-62-1
20A43 20A38, 20A30 20A31 20A33 20A42, 20A36 20A32 20A43, 20A30 20A33 20A33
Agents, groups of agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances (associated with metals and nonmetals, or tobacco) evaluated in IARC Monographs Volumes 1-95. This list contains all agents evaluated as of November-December 2006 that are considered: Carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), and possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). For details of the evaluation, the relevant Monograph should be consulted, see http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/crthgr01.php.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 914
11/24/08 12:35:14 PM
915
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
As, usually considered as As2O3 in tobacco, was removed from tobacco agronomy in 1952. Between 1917 and 1951 the As level in tobacco rose from about 12 to 57 μg/g (1459). By 1968 the As level in tobacco had decreased from the 1951 value of more than 50 μg/g to a 1968 value of 0.5 to 1.0 μg/g, a value similar to that reported by Griffin et al. (1391). Some of these chronological data were summarized by the U.S. Surgeon General in 1979 (20A107) and IARC (1871). In 1957, Cogbill and Hobbs (769) reported the transfer of As from a cigarette containing 7.1 μg of As to MSS to be 3.5%. With the tobaccos analyzed for As by Griffin et al. (1391), the As content of the MSS would range from 0.018 to 0.035 μg/cigarette. In 1968, Guthrie (1457) reported the As transfer from cigarette tobacco to its MSS varied between 4% and 12%. In 1990, Tso (3973) noted that for most tobaccos at that time the As level was around 0.1 to 0.5 μg/g (3300). XX.C.1.b Beryllium (Be) Studies on laboratory animals exposed to high Be dose and epidemiological data have indicated that Be may cause cancer, although Be has been classified as a Group 1 substance by IARC. However, IARC noted a number of limitations in the epidemiological studies, namely poor exposure characterization, relatively low excess cancer risk, and the lack of discussion of exposure to other lung carcinogens. The potential of Be to induce developmental effects has not been investigated adequately (20A02). No literature information was found on the toxicity of Be by ingestion (20A116). The level of Be reported in cigarette MSS ranges from 0 to 0.5 ng/ cigarette (1742, 1744, 3711). XX.C.1.c Chromium (Cr), Cadmium (Cd), and Lead (Pb) The possible roles of Cr, Cd, and Pb in tobacco carcinogenesis are difficult to evaluate given the present data base. In 1990, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) stated: “Taken together, the evidence for a major role of these materials as etiologic factors in tobacco carcinogenesis is not compelling.” XX.C.1.d Chromium VI [Cr (VI)] Seventeen years have elapsed since the IARC originally evaluated the carcinogenicity of Cr and Cr compounds. In 2000 De Flora (20A12) reviewed the toxicology of Cr compounds. A wealth of results indicate that Cr metal, Cr (III), and Cr (VI) can induce a variety of genetic and related effects in vitro (20A12). But there is a lack of carcinogenicity of Cr metal and Cr (III) compounds in experimental animals and only a minority of animal carcinogenicity data with Cr (VI) compounds were positive (30 out of 70, i.e. 42.9%). Moreover, most positive studies used administration routes that do not mimic any human exposure and by-pass physiological defense mechanisms. Typically, positive results were only obtained at implantation sites and at the highest dose tested. Exposure to Cr (VI) has been known for more than a century to be associated with induction of cancer in humans (20A12).
De Flora stated: Carcinogenicity requires massive exposures, as is only encountered in well defined occupational settings, and is site specific, being specifically targeted to the lung and, in some cases, to the sinonasal cavity. Increased death rates for cancers at other sites, which were occasionally reported in some epidemiological studies, were almost invariably not statistically significant and inconsistent (being counterbalanced by other studies which apparently showed decreased rates for the same cancers) (20A12). Chromium (VI) can be reduced in body fluids and non-target cells, which results in its detoxification, due to the poor ability of chromium (III) to cross cell membranes. In target cells, chromium (VI) tends to be metabolized by a network of mechanisms leading to generation of reduced chromium species and reactive oxygen species, which will result either in activation or in detoxification depending on the site of the intracellular reduction and its proximity to DNA. When introduced by the oral route, chromium (VI) is efficiently detoxified upon reduction by saliva and gastric juice, and sequestration by intestinal bacteria. If some chromium (VI) is absorbed by the intestine, it is massively reduced in the blood of the portal system and then in the liver. These mechanisms explain the lack of genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and induction of other long-term health effects of chromium (VI) by the oral route. Within the respiratory tract, chromium (VI) is reduced in the epitheliallining fluid, pulmonary alveolar macrophages, bronchial tree and peripheral lung parenchyma cells. Hence, lung cancer can only be induced when chromium (VI) doses overwhelm these defense mechanisms. The efficient uptake and reduction of chromium (VI) in red blood cells explains its lack of carcinogenicity at a distance from the portal of entry into the body. All experimental and epidemiological data, and the underlying mechanisms, point to the occurrence of thresholds in chromium (VI) carcinogenesis (20A12).
Although Cr (VI) has often been alleged to exist in MSS, it has never been unequivocally identified in tobacco smoke (20A95). XX.C.1.e Nickel (Ni) The USPHS (20A109) made the following statement on the occurrence of Ni in tobacco smoke: “It is not likely that nickel plays a significant role in the etiology of lung cancer in cigarette smokers.” During the 1960s the Sundermans reported that they had found Ni in MSS (3837). They speculated that Ni could possible react with CO in MSS to form nickel carbonyl. The Sundermans did not successfully induce lung cancer in rats exposed to tobacco smoke although much furor was raised as to their allegations (3837, 3838). XX.C.1.f Cobalt (Co) Co has been identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Co and Co-containing compounds have been evaluated by IARC and are classified as Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic agents) (20A31). This category is used for agents for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 915
11/24/08 12:35:14 PM
916
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. It may also be used when there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans but there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. In some instances, an agent for which there is inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less than sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals together with supporting evidence from mechanistic and other relevant data may be placed in this group. An agent may be classified in this category solely on the basis of strong evidence from mechanistic and other relevant data (IARC Preamble, see http://monographs.iarc.fr/ ENG/Preamble/CurrentPreamble.pdf).
Two large randomized trials on antioxidants (e.g., β-carotene and α-tocopherol) and Se to determine their effects on cancer risk (Chinese Cancer Prevention Study and the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT). The Chinese study showed that a combination of β-carotene, vitamin E, and Se significantly reduced total mortality (9%), cancer mortality (13%), gastric cancer mortality (20%), and mortality of the other cancers (19%) (20A07). The SELECT is currently taking place in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada to determine if taking Se and/or vitamin E supplements can prevent prostate cancer in men aged fifty or older (20A82).
XX.C.1.g Mercury (Hg) Hg has been identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Hg and inorganic Hg compounds (20A27) are classified by IARC as Group 3 agents (not classifiable as to carcinogenicity to humans). This category is used most commonly for agents for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals. Exceptionally, agents for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans. Agents that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category. An evaluation in Group 3 is not a determination of noncarcinogenicity or overall safety. It often means that further research is needed, especially when exposures are widespread or the cancer data are consistent with differing interpretations (IARC Preamble, see http://monographs.iarc. fr/ENG/Preamble/CurrentPreamble.pdf).
XX.C.1.i 210Polonium (210Po) For the last quarter of a century there has been a controversy over the presence and health effects of 210Po in tobacco smoke. The quantities of 210Po found in the lungs of smokers are generally about three times higher than those in nonsmokers. However, the significance of 210Po in tobaccoinduced lung cancer has been questioned upon comparison of these data with those obtained in miners (1509, 1727). In the case of 210Po, a recent in-depth study raises doubts on the significance of 210Po as a factor contributing to lung cancer in smokers (3300). 210Po is present in tobacco and tobacco smoke (0.03 to 1.0 pCi/cigarette); however, it is unlikely that these traces represent a major risk for the smoker (20A109). Rodgman and Green (3300) recently published a cancer risk assessment on toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Where there were sufficient data on carcinogenicity (animal and/or human), incremental lifetime cancer risks (ILCR) were calculated for those elements and isotopes. None of the elements (above) called Hoffmann analytes exhibited more than a low to very low ILCR (3300). For some of the elements there was insufficient cancer risk information necessary to calculate an ILRC, for example, Co, Hg, Se, and Cr. For these elements, either there were few health concerns anticipated by regulatory bodies (such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or World Health Organization) or studies documenting cancer associated with these elements were not available. In view of these various uncertainties in published data and comments made by known authorities and regulatory bodies (as to either the level of these elements in smoke or their carcinogenic potency of the element) it is difficult at the present time to conclude that any of the metals and metal isotopes represents a significant hazard to the human smoker.
XX.C.1.h Selenium (Se) Se has been identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The MSS yield of Se in the University of Kentucky reference cigarette 1R4F is 1.2 ng/cigarette (3300). Se and Se compounds (20A36) are classified by IARC as Group 3 agents (not classifiable as to carcinogenicity to humans). Se is not an antioxidant nutrient unto itself, but is a component of antioxidant enzymes. It possesses excellent antioxidant, antimutagenic, and anticarcinogenic properties (1177a, 3257, 3685, 20A46, 20A92, 20A93, 20A102, 20A113). El-Bayoumy (20A15) described the protective role of Se on genetic damage and on cancer. Fiökin et al. (20A22) conducted research that demonstrated a protective effect of vitamin E and Se against ETS exposure through reduction in the occurrence of lipid peroxidation. Clark et al. (20A09) reported that taking a Se supplement decreased the incidence of prostate cancer in men by more than 60% (20A09). The final analysis of the trial, published in 2002, by DuffieldLillico et al. (20A14) showed a 52% reduction of prostate cancer in men taking Se daily.
XX.D Summary To date, eighty-one elements (metals and nonmetals), fortyfive isotopes, and twenty-four ions have been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. As indicated in Table XX-4, 146 have been identified in tobacco, 116 have been identified in tobacco smoke, and 112 are found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Table XX-5 provides a tabulation of the metallic and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 916
11/24/08 12:35:15 PM
917
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
Table XX-4 Distribution of Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes and Ions between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Number of Identified Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes and Ions between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component
Total
Smoke
Tobacco
Elements: 81 Metals Nonmetals
69 12
68 12
68 10
67 10
Isotopes: 45 Metal isotopes Nonmetal isotopes
39 6
20 4
39 5
20 3
Ions: 24 Totals
Smoke and Tobacco
24
12
24
12
150
116
146
112
nonmetallic elements, isotopes, and ions in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. There are numerous compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke that contain metals and nonmetals. No review articles have been published on these types of compounds in tobacco and smoke. In most papers, when they are mentioned, they are collectively called miscellaneous compounds. The compounds listed in Table XX-6 consist mainly of acid salts of sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium, metal oxides, hydroxides, carbonates, and carbonyl-containing compounds, halide salts of
organic compounds, a variety of organometallic compounds, for example, triphenylarsine, aluminum and magnesium phosphide, triphenylstannium hydroxide, certain agrochemicals that contain metals, such as Alloxydim-sodium®, potassium salt of gibberellic acid, and Zineb®, and several metal-containing biomolecules, such as globulins, cytochrome c6, and chlorophyll a and b. For the sake of completeness, several ammonium compounds and the acid salts and various ions of nitric, sulfuric, and phosphoric acids are included in Table XX-6. Overall, Table XX-6 lists 125 chemical components.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 917
11/24/08 12:35:15 PM
918
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-5 Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
&
(%)
$'(#*!,%-
*!%!+$
&&)$&"
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
&&
*!%!+$!)&*&'&$))
*!%!+$!)&*&'&$))
#+$!%+$
%*!$&%.
%*!$&%.!)&*&'&$))
(&%
()%!
(!+$
(.##!+$
!)$+*
%*!$&%.!)&*&'&$))
()%!!)&*&'&$))
!)$+* !)&*&'&$))
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 918
11/24/08 12:35:15 PM
919
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &
(%)
$'(#*!,%-
&&)$&"
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
&&
!)$+* !)&*&'&$))
&(&%
(&$!
(&$!%
(&$!%!)&*&'&$))
$!+$
#!+$
#!+$!&%
#!+$!)&*&'&$)) (&%
(&%!)&*&'&$))
(!+$
(!+$!)&*&'&$))
)!+$
)!+$!)&*&'&$))
)!+$!)&*&'&$))
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 919
11/24/08 12:35:16 PM
920
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke )
)),')%!
#&)+$(! #&)+$(!$,)-)*!)"',, #+)'$.'
#+)'$.'$,)-)*!)"',, )&-
)&-$,)-)*!)"',, )**!+
)**!+$)(.
)) ,.,-$-.-! ,')%!
))
#&)+$ !
!"!+!(!,
'!*!+)&&!-$/!( !0
1,*+),$.'
+$.'
&.)+$ !
&.)+$(!
.+)*$.'
.+)*$.'$,)-)*!)"',,
)&$($.'
&&$.'
!+'($.'
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 920
11/24/08 12:35:17 PM
921
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke *
!"!,!)!-
(!+!,*''!.%0!) !1
**-(*&!
** -/-.%./.! -(*&!
**
*'
")%/(
*'(%/(
2 ,*#!)
) %/(
* %)!
,% %/(
,*)
* % !
,*)%*)!
,*)%-*.*+!*"(--
).$)/(
).$)/(%-*.*+!*"(--
!
! %-*.*+!*"(--
! %-*.*+!*"(--
! %-*.*+!*"(--
! %-*.*+!*"(--
!
%.$%/(
%.$%/(%*)%
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 921
11/24/08 12:35:18 PM
922
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke '
)&*
%()'$$+"-&.
''*%'#
'' *,*+"+,+ *%'#
''
,+",%
!&*",%
!&*",%"'&!
&!&*
&!&*"*'+'(' %**
&!&*"'&&
),)/
),)/"*'+'(' %** '$/&,%
'$/&,%"'&'
'/%",%
"#$
"'",%
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 922
11/24/08 12:35:18 PM
923
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &
(%)
$'(#*!,%-
!*(*
&&)$&"
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
&&
)$!+$
-. %
##!+$
!*(!*
!*(& %
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 923
11/24/08 12:35:19 PM
924
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke (
*'+
&)*(%%,#.'/
((+&($
"(+)",
"(+)",#"0*(!'
"(+)",&('("0*(!'
"(+)"(*-+
"(+)"(*-+#+(,()( &++ %,#'-&
(( +-+,#,-, +&($
((
%-,('#-&#+(,()( &++
%-,('#-&#+(,()( &++
%-,('#-&#+(,()( &++ (%('#-&
(%('#-&#+(,()( &++
(,++#-&
(,++#-&#+(,()( &++
(,++#-&#+(,()&++
(,++#-&#('
(
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 924
11/24/08 12:35:20 PM
925
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &
(%)
$'(#*!,%-
&&)$&"
&& )+)*!*+* )$&"
&&
!+$!)&*&'&$))
&%
&%!)&*&'&$))
%!+$
&!+$
+!!+$
()&.$!+$
+!!+$!&%
+* %!+$
$(!+$
%!+$
%!+$!)&*&'&$))
%!+$!)&*&'&$))
#%!+$
!#!&%
!#,(
#%!+$!)&*&'&$))
!#,(!)&*&'&$))
&!+$
&!+$!&%
&!+$!)&*&'$))
*(&%*!+$
*(&%*!+$!)&*&'&$))
*(&%*!+$!)&*&'&$))
+#*
+#!
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 925
11/24/08 12:35:20 PM
926
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-5 (continued) Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements and Ions in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke *
!"!,!)!-
(!+!,*''!.%0!) !1
**-(*&!
** -/-.%./.! -(*&!
**
/'"/,
).'/(
!,%/(
$''%/(
$/'%/(
%)
%.)%/(
/)#-.!)
,)%/(
/'"%.!
!''/,%/(
$%*2).! $*,%/( $*,%/(%-*.*+!*"(--
,)%/(%-*.*+!*"(-- ) %/( ..!,%/(
..,%/(
..,%/(%-*.*+!*"(--
%)
%)%*))
%)%-*.*+!*"(--
%,*)%/(
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 926
11/24/08 12:35:21 PM
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
927
Table XX-6 Various Ionic and Covalently Bonded Organic and Inorganic Compounds Containing Metals and Nonmetals, Miscellaneous Ions, and Organometallic Compounds Found in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 927
11/24/08 12:35:23 PM
928
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-6 (Continued) Various Ionic and Covalently Bonded Organic and Inorganic Compounds Containing Metals and Nonmetals, Miscellaneous Ions, and Organometallic Compounds Found in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 928
11/24/08 12:35:26 PM
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
929
Table XX-6 (Continued) Various Ionic and Covalently Bonded Organic and Inorganic Compounds Containing Metals and Nonmetals, Miscellaneous Ions, and Organometallic Compounds Found in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 929
11/24/08 12:35:26 PM
930
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-6 (Continued) Various Ionic and Covalently Bonded Organic and Inorganic Compounds Containing Metals and Nonmetals, Miscellaneous Ions, and Organometallic Compounds Found in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 930
11/24/08 12:35:27 PM
Metallic and Nonmetallic Elements, Isotopes, Ions, and Salts
931
Table XX-6 (Continued) Various Ionic and Covalently Bonded Organic and Inorganic Compounds Containing Metals and Nonmetals, Miscellaneous Ions, and Organometallic Compounds Found in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 931
11/24/08 12:35:30 PM
932
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XX-6 (Continued) Various Ionic and Covalently Bonded Organic and Inorganic Compounds Containing Metals and Nonmetals, Miscellaneous Ions, and Organometallic Compounds Found in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C020.indd 932
11/24/08 12:35:32 PM
21
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
Since 2500 BC, farmers have used pesticides to prevent damage to their crops. The first known pesticide was elemental sulfur, used to dust crops in Sumeria about 4500 years ago. By the fifteenth century, pesticides containing arsenic, mercury, and lead were being applied to crops. In the seventeenth century, nicotine was extracted from tobacco leaves as nicotine sulfate for use as an insecticide. In the nineteenth century, two more natural pesticides were introduced: pyrethrum (extracted from chrysanthemums) and rotenone (extracted from the roots and stems of several tropical and subtropical plant species of the genus Lonchocarpus or Derris) [Miller (21A46)]. From the 1860s until the advent in 1942 of DDT (1-chloro2-[2,2,2-trichloro-1-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]benzene), there were numerous inorganic and naturally occurring compounds (inorganic and organic components extracted from plants and animals) developed and used for control of insects and plant diseases, particularly fungi. Little progress occurred in the discovery of natural or chemical means to control weeds. The chemistry of arsenicals was further exploited to control insects (Paris Green [copper(II) acetoarsenite]). Bordeaux mixture (copper sulfate and lime) was found to be extremely useful in the control of plant diseases, leading to its widespread usage. The invention of the pressure sprayer (both hand and power driven) made efficient large-scale application of pesticides feasible and economical. Aerial application was also invented (in the early 1920s), leading to expanded applications in agriculture. The availability of DDT, beginning in 1945 for civilian/agricultural usage, opened a new era of pest control, leading not only to its extensive usage but also to the development of numerous other synthetic organic insecticides, for example, organophosphates in 1946. About two years earlier in 1944, selective synthetic organic herbicides were discovered, starting with 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), which revolutionized weed control in agriculture and elsewhere. Also, synthetic organic fungicides (metal based) were developed as effective controls of plant diseases (and for other applications). During the 1950s and 1960s, granular pesticide formulations were developed, which led to large expansions of pesticide usage on major field crops [Aspelin (21A02)]. Prior to the advent of DDT (and other organic pesticides which rapidly followed), most pesticides used in agriculture were applied to protect high value/small acreage crops, principally fruits, vegetables, and cotton. This, however, changed dramatically in the 1950s, as major field crops, for example, corn, sorghum, grains, tobacco, and soybeans, rapidly began to account for a majority of pesticide usage [Aspelin (21A02)]. By the 1960s, some very important new families of chemicals were discovered as herbicides, for example, triazines,
acetanilides, and dinitroanilines. In the 1970s, synthetic pyrethroids replaced much of the insecticide chemistry developed during the previous twenty years. During the 1980s, imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides dramatically lowered application rates for weed control. During the 1990s and currently, agrochemical companies are employing new synthetic methods to produce safer pesticides (and growth regulators) for use on crops. The emphasis today in the development and use of pesticide and growth regulators is towards safer, more effective biological agents and pesticides applied at lower levels, and enhanced stewardship in use of available pesticides [Aspelin (21A02)]. Tobacco is an agricultural product processed from the leaves of plants in genus Nicotiana of the nightshade family (Solanaceae). Nicotiana is indigenous to North and South America but numerous species of Nicotiana (over sixty) are found throughout the world. The two main species cultivated and grown to produce tobacco and tobacco products worldwide are Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana rustica. N. tabacum is the most widely cultivated and used for production of tobacco leaf for cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff, snus, pipe tobacco, and other forms of tobacco products. N. rustica is the second most widely grown N. species. Its leaves are extracted for nicotine, pyridine products, and solanesol (3973). Tobacco has evolved over the centuries to be resistant to many types of pests and infections. The plants produce numerous compounds that provide for its protection. For example, the plants contain high levels of nicotine. It constitutes 0.3% to 5% in N. tabacum and up to 8% to 10% in N. rustica based on the dry weight of the tobacco leaves. Its biosynthesis takes place in the roots, and it accumulates in the leaves. It is a potent neurotoxin for many pests, with particular specificity to insects. Therefore, nicotine and salts of nicotine, for example, Black Leaf 40® (nicotine sulfate), have been widely used as insecticides in the past (21A06, 21A07, 21A39–21A42), and currently, nicotine derivatives such as Imidacloprid® [1-((6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl)-N-nitroimidazolidinimine] continue to be widely used (3973). Pesticides and plant growth regulators are important parts of modern agricultural and horticultural productivity. These pesticides can be naturally occurring in the plant or synthetically produced. Although naturally produced pesticides and growth regulators are effective, their concentrations in the plant are often lower than necessary to completely eradicate harmful pests and infections. Some naturally occurring pesticides are harvested from plants and sold commercially, for example, Bacillus thuringiensis, Derris (rotenone), pyrethrum, Neem oil, and nicotine (nicotine salts) [Environmental Protection Agency (21A21)]. Over the last sixty to seventy 933
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 933
11/13/08 5:45:21 PM
934
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
years, hundreds of synthetic pesticides and growth regulators have been developed for application to tobacco at various stages in its development and during storage prior to use in commercial tobacco products to reduce or eradicate certain pests, for example, insects, mice, and other animals, unwanted plants (weeds), fungi, microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses, and infectious proteins. Some of the most effective pesticides and growth regulators are synthetic. Unfortunately, a number of highly effective synthetic pesticides are extremely harmful to both the environment and humans. One significant problem with synthetic insecticides is their longevity. This longevity is mostly due to the fact that many synthetic insecticides are not biodegradable. Consequently, these pesticides remain in the ecosystem for long periods of time and can have disastrous consequences on organisms that subsequently absorb the insecticide. Arsenic salts (1459, 1460) and DDT (707–709) are good examples of synthetic pesticides that remained in the ecosystem for a long time, and that have had considerable negative consequences. As a result of the possible harm to both humans and the environment associated with synthetic pesticides, worldwide regulations are now in place. These regulations vary from country to country and apply to both synthetic agrochemicals and harvested natural pesticides [Environmental Protection Agency (21A21)]. Based on a definition by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a pesticide is any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest. The term pesticide also applies to herbicides, fungicides, and various other substances used to control pests. Under U.S. law, a pesticide is also any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant. Pests are living organisms that are present where they are not wanted or that cause damage to crops or humans or other animals. The EPA regulates both naturally occurring chemicals harvested or extracted from plants as pesticides and growth regulators, as well as synthetic agrochemicals [EPA (21A21)]. There are five broad chemical classifications or categories of pesticides (four for synthetic pesticides and one for natural or plant-derived pesticides). Each of the following five chemical/biological categories of synthetic and harvested/extracted natural pesticides and growth regulators includes examples of commercial pesticides: • Organochloride pesticides: Aldrin®, Chlordane®, Dieldrin®, DDT, Endosulfan®, Endrin®, Heptachlor®, Lindane®, Methoxychlor®, Mirex®, TDE. • Organophosphorus pesticides: Acephate®, Azinphosmethyl®, Chlorpyrifos®, Chlorpyriphos-methyl®, Diazinon®, Dichlorvos® (DDVP), Dicrotophos®, Dimethoate®, Disulfoton®, Ethoprop®, Fenamiphos®, Fenitrothion®, Fenthion®, Fosthiazate®, Malathion®, Methamidophos®, Methidathion®, Methyl-parathion®, Mevinphos®, Naled®, Oxydemeton-methyl®, Parathion®, Phorate®, Phosalone®, Phosmet®, Pirimiphosmethyl®, Profenofos®, Terbufos®, Tetrachlorvinphos®, Trichlorfon®.
• Carbamate pesticides: Aldicarb®, Carbofuran®, Carbaryl®, Methom®. • Pyrethroid pesticides: Allethrin®, Bifenthrin®, Deltamethrin®, Permethrin®, Resmethrin®, ® ® Tetramethrin , Tralomethrin . • Plant derived pesticides: Azadirachtin A and B (obtained from Azadirachta indica), Bacillus thuringiensis, Derris (rotenone), Neem oil (obtained from Azadirachta indica), nicotine, pyrethrum, Spinosad (a mixture of spinosyn A and spinosyn D) derived from soil bacterium Saccharopolyspora spinosa. Not every pesticide and growth regulator example listed above may be approved for use on tobacco. This chapter provides information on pesticides and growth regulator residues (synthetic and natural occurring) identified on tobacco and identified in tobacco smoke. It also provides data on the transfer rates of these residues on tobacco to tobacco mainstream smoke (MSS) and certain examples of degradation/decomposition products from pesticides and growth regulator residues identified in MSS. Finally, a brief review of analytical methods for the analysis of pesticides and growth regulator residues on tobacco and in tobacco smoke is provided.
XXI.A Synthetic Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulator Residues on Tobacco Pesticide and growth regulator residues on tobacco and their transfer rates to MSS have been the subject of several reviews and multiple chapters in books. In the late 1960s, Guthrie and Bowery (21A25) and Guthrie (1457, 1458) reviewed the early literature dealing especially with residues of arsenic and the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides, as well as those of carbamates and organophosphorus compounds used on tobacco. In another publication, Guthrie (21A24) summarized legislation on pesticide residues on tobacco and tobacco products in countries around the world as of 1973. In that paper, he also included an updated account of residues in U.S. tobacco and tobacco products. Ladisch in 1973 reviewed the known chlorinated pesticides in tobacco and tobacco smoke (21A31). Two reviews published in 1979 discuss the influence of growth regulators and herbicides [Steffens (3811a)] and insecticides and nematicides [Sheets and Leidy (3634)] on the chemistry of tobacco. These reviews contained updates on residues of pesticides. Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) reviewed the known pesticides in tobacco and smoke and literature on decomposition products from pesticides in 1980. In 1986, Wittekindt (4271a) reviewed the pesticides recommended for use of tobacco in twenty-two countries, listed the maximum residues for eleven pesticides allowed on tobacco products in Germany, and presented a list of maximum amounts recommended by the German cigarette industry for seventy-one other pesticides.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 934
11/13/08 5:45:22 PM
935
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
Davis et al. (21A17) and Meyer et al. (21A45) presented a detailed analysis of maleic hydrazide (MH) residues in U.S. tobacco and discussed the toxicological implications of the residues. In 1989, the 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference (TCRC) symposium was dedicated to the subject of regulation of insect and pathogen activity in tobacco and tobacco products. In that symposium, Benezet (21A05) reviewed chemical means to control pests in tobacco and tobacco products and their interaction. At that same symposium Danehower (21A16) and Jackson et al. (21A29) reviewed the role of natural tobacco constituents that are effective pesticides (21A30). Cousins (21A14a) published a review on herbicides and suckering agents in 1989. In 1972 and again in 1990 Tso published books on the chemistry and biology of tobacco (3972, 3973). In both books he devoted two chapters to pesticides and growth regulators (both compounds native to tobacco and applied agrochemicals). In 1991, Sheets (3633) presented a very thorough review of all known pesticides to that date. Davis and Nielsen edited a book in 1999 on tobacco production, chemistry, and technology (910a). Several chapters in that book reviewed various types of pesticides employed in the production of different types of tobacco (2483a, 2650b, 2892a, 3646a, 3661a). In 2002, Blanc et al. (21A06) reviewed the use of natural insecticides and pesticides for use on tobacco. Mueller (2650a) reviewed current approaches and tools for the management of pesticide residues on tobacco in 2005 at the 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference. Most recently in 2005, Eberhardt (21A19) prepared an extensive review of pesticides used on tobacco, the transfer rates of pesticides to MSS and sidestream smoke (SSS), and decomposition products of pesticide residues identified in MSS. The most commonly used commercial pesticides and growth regulators for tobacco, as of 1998, include: Insecticides: Acephate®, Aldicarb®, Bacillus thuringiensis, Carbaryl®, Carbofuran®, Chlorpyrifos®, Diazinon®, Disulfoton®, Endosulfan®, Ethoprop®, Fenamiphos®, Fonofos®, Imidacloprid®, Malathion®, Methidathion®, Methomyl®, Spinosad®, Trichlorfon®; Herbicides: Benefin®, Clomazone®, Diphenamid®, Isopropalin®, Napropamide®, Pebulate®, Pendimethalin®, Sethoxydim®, Sulfentrazone®; Fungicides: Dimethomorph®, Mancozeb®, Mefenoxam®, Metalaxyl®; Plant growth regulators: Ethephon®, Flumetralin®; Plant growth regulators as herbicides: maleic hydrazide; Fumigants as insecticides: Chloropicrin®; Fumigants as insecticides or herbicides: methyl bromide; Fungicides as insecticides or herbicides: 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) (21A59). Worldwide pesticide use has increased 50-fold since 1950, and 2.5 million tons of industrial pesticides are now used each year [Miller (21A46)]. More than 25 million pounds of pesticides are used in tobacco production in the United States,
and tobacco ranks sixth among all agricultural commodities in the amount of pesticides applied per acre, according to the U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) (21A59). Tobacco farmers use a considerable quantity of pesticides and growth regulators to increase leaf yield and quality and, hence, a greater profit for their crop. Even with the greatest caution used by farmers in applying the agrochemicals, a certain level of these pesticides and growth regulators remain on the leaf after harvesting and curing. Additional pesticides are often used on tobacco that is stored to control insect populations and small but detectable levels of pesticides remain on tobacco prior to its use in manufacture of tobacco products. Therefore, certain residual pesticides are expected to be present on tobacco. Since about 1950 over 200 types of pesticides and growth regulators have been used on tobacco crops. Some are no longer used as many technological improvements have been made during that time and our knowledge of the effectiveness of different agrochemicals on pest has improved. All the newer pesticides are now regulated and strenuous testing programs exist to assure that these agrochemicals meet safety (human and environmental [soil and air]) requirements (21A21). Additionally, agricultural breeding practices have generated new varieties of tobacco plants that are often more resistant to certain plant diseases and insects (21A21). Even with all the safety measures in place residual levels of agrochemicals have been identified in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Degradation products from the thermal degradation, pyrolysis, and combustion of these agrochemicals have also been identified on tobacco and in tobacco smoke. Generally, the level of residue tobacco pesticides and growth regulators is very small (ng/kg tobacco, ppm range). The transfer rate of these pesticides and growth regulators to MSS varies tremendously but is generally less than 30%, in many cases less than 10%, and in some cases less than 1% [Eberhardt (21A19)]. The existence of trace levels of pesticides and growth regulators in tobacco smoke was made possible by the advent of modern analytical methodologies, particularly gas capillary gas chromatography (GC/GC), gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
XXI.B Naturally Occurring Plant Growth Regulators and Pesticides in Tobacco Auxins are a class of plant growth substance (often called phytohormones or plant hormones). The most important member of the auxin family found in all plants is indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). It generates the majority of auxin effects in intact plants, and is the most potent native auxin. Naturally occurring auxins include gibberellic acid, IAA, phenylacetic acid (PAA), and indole-3-butanoic acid (IBA) (3973). Gibberellic acid and several gibberellins are sold commercially as plant growth regulators. Auxins play an essential role in coordination of many growth and behavioral processes in the plant life cycle. When stimulated during normal plant growth or when
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 935
11/13/08 5:45:23 PM
936
applied to the plant at high concentrations auxins produce ethylene. Excess ethylene inhibits elongation growth, causes leaf abscission, and can even kill the plant (21A14). Synthetic auxins and commercially available auxins are effective herbicides by their effective promotion of ethylene in plants. Synthetic auxin analogs include 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indole-3 -butanoic acid, and 2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorobenzoic acid [Hobbie and Estelle (21A27), Hobbie et al. (21A28), Lomax et al. (21A35)]. Additionally, compounds such as naturally occurring pyrethrins (21A15, 21A20, 21A23, 21A32–21A34), Neem oil (a mixture from Azadirachta indica of more than 135 compounds), Azadirachtin A and B from Azadirachta indica [Akol et al. (21A01), Biswas et al. (21A05a), Cousins (21A14a)], rotenone [Chamberlin and Madden (21A11)], and Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) are effective naturally occurring pesticides (3973, 21A54). Of course, the most plentiful naturally occurring insecticide in tobacco is nicotine [Busbey and McIndoo (21A07, 21A08), McIndoo et al. (21A40-21A42), McIndoo (21A39), Steppuhn et al. (21A55)]. In 1989, Danehower (21A16) reviewed the field of naturally occurring tobacco growth regulators and pesticides at the 43rd TCRC. Numerous effective naturally occurring pesticides are found on the surface of tobacco leaves, including n-, iso-, and anteiso-paraffinic hydrocarbons; aliphatic alcohols and acids; wax esters; α- and β-4,8,13-duvatrien-1-ols, the α- and β-duvatrienediols (12,Z)-labda-12,14-diene-8α-ol, Z-abienol; (13,E)-labda-12-ene-8α, 15-diol, labdenediol; numerous sucrose esters (C2-C8 acids); several labdane diterpenes (sclareol-type); nicotine; nornicotine; formylnornicotine; acetylnornicotine; 3-hydroxy- acylnornicotines (C12-C16); acyl nornicotines (C12 to C13) with n-, iso-, and anteiso-methyl branching; and numerous phenolic compounds derived from shikimic acid, for example, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, gentisic acid, cichoriin, isoquercitin, rutin and their glucosides, and the mevalonic acid, for example, capsidol, solavetivone, solanascone, occidol, and numerous other sequiterpenoids created from diverse biological pathways in tobacco.
XXI.C Transfer Rates of Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators to MSS Tobacco, because it is subject to many types of pests, can be damaged both physically and chemically. Serious infections can result and have led to total crop failures. Efforts are continually being made to breed new varieties of tobacco resistant to disease and various pests (aphids, hornworms, various nematodes, etc.). Additionally, herbicides of various types are widely used to control unwanted vegetation in the fields. As a result, the use of pesticides and various plant growth regulators is widespread and at present is the primary means used by tobacco farmers to improve tobacco quality and yield. The level of pesticide (and plant growth regulator) residues on tobacco has always been a concern to tobacco growers, the tobacco industry, and governmental regulators in terms of the safety of the resulting tobacco products. Hundreds of
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
tobacco pesticides and plant growth regulators have been developed and marketed in the past. Fewer than twenty-five are currently regulated and employed by farmers and the tobacco industry (3633). Regardless of the intended use of these pesticides and growth regulators, it seems inevitable that certain levels remain on the tobacco leaf. This is particularly true today, not necessarily because inordinate levels of pesticides are employed on tobacco but because tremendous advances in analytical chemistry have enabled scientists to detect extremely low levels (picogram to fentagram levels) of these residues (or their decomposition products). As certain agrochemicals used for pest control and growth regulation leave residues on cured tobacco leaves, some residual pesticides and growth regulators have been identified in tobacco smoke. An important question concerning consumer safety is whether the residual levels of pesticides (or growth regulators) represent a danger to the public. At the completion in 1976 of the study of the second set of experimental cigarettes in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) decade-long study on the “less hazardous” cigarette, it was reported that the long-chained alcohols used as suckering agents on tobacco had no adverse chemical or biological effect on cigarette MSS. In the 1976 report, Gori (1330) summarized this aspect of the NCI second study: The fatty alcohol, fatty alcohol × 100, and hand-suckered blends showed no significant difference among themselves or from the SEB II blend [see p. 2 in (1330)]. No statistically significant differences were observed among Hand-suckered, Fatty Acid-Normal, and Fatty Acid × 100 Blends (variables 60, 61, and 62) [see p. 14 in (1330)]
In the fourth NCI study completed in 1980, the chemical and biological properties of the MSSs from cigarettes made from pesticide-treated tobacco and pesticide-free tobacco were compared. Gori wrote [see p. 7 in (1333)]: No significant differences were observed between cigarettes made from pesticide-treated tobacco leaves and pesticidefree tobacco leaves.
The pesticide-treated vs. pesticide-free tobaccos used in this phase of the NCI study were those grown in Prince Edward Island, Canada. The commercial pesticides used on the tobacco included Chlorpyriphos®, Trichlorfon®, Diphenamide®, Methomyl®, DDT, Carbaryl®, maleic hydrazide, and C10 alcohol. The pesticide-treated tobacco properties were described in 1980 by Tso et al. (3973, 3977): It appears that chemicals currently registered for use on tobacco, when applied as directed, are of no significance in increasing biological activity of cigarette smoke condensate [see p. 151 in (3973)].
In 2005, Eberhardt (21A19) reported on pesticide residues on tobacco, the transfer rates of selected pesticide residues, and pyrolysis products of some pesticide residues as part
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 936
11/13/08 5:45:23 PM
937
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
of the CORESTA Sub-group study on pesticide residues. Information on forty agrochemicals (used from the 1950s to the present) was obtained from sixty-four literature references. The agrochemicals evaluated were insecticides, fumigants, fungicides, herbicides, and growth regulators. These represented a diverse set of compounds, including alcohols, acids, organophosphates, organohalides, carbamates, dithiocarbamates, pyrethrins, dinitro compounds, organonitrogen compounds, and heterocyclics. Prior to the work by Eberhardt (21A19), Rix (4857, 4858) evaluated the transfer of selected agrochemicals (Dicamba®, Formothion®, and Thiodan®) from tobacco to smoke. For the majority of the commercial pesticides (and plant growth regulators) reviewed by Eberhardt (21A19), only minimal information existed for their transfer into the smoke and for pyrolysis products. It must be noted that some of the agrochemicals listed, for example, Leptophos®, TDE, had only minor significance in tobacco cultivation and were added to tobacco for purely experimental reasons to study smoke transfer rates. Additionally, not all authors who provided information on transfer rates gave precise details on the pesticide concentrations in the original material used. There are only a few pesticides, such as DDT, maleic hydrazide, and several dithiocarbamates, where the transfer rates seemed to be adequately investigated, that is, in sufficient number and by different research groups [Atallah et al. (1051d, 21A03, 21A04), Chopra et al. (707, 708, 712, 714, 716), Guthrie et al. (1457, 1458), Hoffmann and Rathkamp (1756), and Hoffmann et al. (1761, 1767)]. A number of publications by these authors used labeled agrochemicals (sixteen of the sixty studies), which provided information on the fate of the original substance in tobacco MSS and SSS as well as their presence in the vapor and particulate phases of the smoke streams. As most of the naturally occurring pesticides and plant growth regulators exist in tobacco, no information on the transfer rates to tobacco smoke are available. Table XXI-3 lists the majority of known pesticides and plant growth regulators used on and identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Although Table XXI-3 lists a great number of natural and synthetic pesticides and growth regulators found in tobacco and tobacco smoke, there are still other pesticides and plant growth regulators that could have been used on tobacco but where no information could be found in the literature. Additionally, individual pesticides and growth regulators often have multiple common names. Therefore in reviewing Table XXI-3, pesticides and growth regulators should be searched by Chemical Abstract number or chemical name. Table XXI-3 contains only a selected number of naturally occurring pesticides and plant growth regulators found in tobacco and tobacco smoke. All of the compounds mentioned in this chapter as naturally occurring pesticides and plant growth regulators are covered in other chapters, for example, the hydrocarbons are discussed in Chapter 1, the duvatrienediols are discussed in Chapter 2, and the nicotinoids are discussed in Chapter 17. The evaluation by Eberhardt (21A19) of the available literature demonstrated that the transfer rate for all residues
studied was much less than 100%. In most studies, the transfer rate of the pesticide to MSS is stated as being <30%. For a small number of agrochemicals, for example, DDT, TDE, Lindane®, HCH-alpha®, markedly higher transfer rates were found, although it should be kept in mind that very broad ranges in transfer rates exist for many of the pesticides examined. Only in a few studies were the transfer rates of residues in plain and filtered cigarettes presented and compared. The data suggested that the presence of a filter in cigarettes slightly reduces the transfer into MSS of some pesticides, e.g., DDT, Disulfoton®, TDE (1127). Several other factors also influenced the transfer rates, for example, the type of tobacco tested, the form of the smoking article, whether cigarette, cigar, cigarillo, or pipe, the type of filter employed, the method of adding the original substance and its amount, variation in smoking conditions, such as puff volume, number of puffs, and the analytical methods employed to determine the agrochemical [Mussalo-Rauhamaa et al. (21A48), Mold and Walker (2596), Carugno (21A10), Schmid and Rastetter (21A52), Mestres et al. (21A43), Hengy and Thirion (1619), Hoffmann et al. (1761), Atallah and Dorough (21A03, 21A04), Thorstenson and Dorough (3915), Smith et al. (3724), Lorenz et al. (21A36–21A38), Guthrie (1457), Dickes et al. (21A18), Dorough and Atallah (1051d), Bowery et al. (415), Hawk et al. (1553), Ceschini and Chauchaix (644), Clark et al. (21A12), Moshy and Halter (21A47), Hengy and Thirion (1618), Meikle (2527), Sitaramaiah et al. (21A53), Thurm (21A57), Stone (21A56), Barkemeyer et al. (186), Chopra and Domanski (707), Chopra and Sherman (712), and Underwood (21A58)]. Table XXI-1 shows the percentage transfer of selected pesticides applied to tobaccos that transfer to MSS. The percentage transfers were generally taken from the publication or were calculated based on data provided in the literature [Eberhardt (21A19)].
XXI.D Decomposition Products of Agrochemicals in Mainstream Smoke The decomposition products identified in MSS of various agrochemicals added to tobacco are shown in Table XXI-2. In some of the published studies reviewed by Eberdardt (21A19), the determination and quantification of the pyrolysis products were the primary objective of the study, for example, Hoffmann et al. (1761), Mestres et al. (21A44), and Higman et al. (1645), and MSS transfer rates for the pesticide were not determined. In other studies 14C-labeled pesticides were evaluated, for example, Atallah and Dorough (21A03, 21A04), Frisch et al. (1243), and Clark et al. (21A12). In most cases the agrochemicals tested were used as purchased, for example, Comer et al. (21A13), Chopra et al. (716), and Chopra and Zuniga (717). For the majority of the pesticides reviewed by Eberhardt (21A19), only minimal information existed for their transfer into smoke and for their pyrolysis products. There are only a
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 937
11/13/08 5:45:24 PM
938
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-1 Percent Transfer of Intact Agrochemicals to Mainstream Smoke (1884, 21A19) Pesticide* Anilazine Azinphos-methyl Benomyl Captan Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos Cyhalothrin Cypermethrin DDT Deltamethrin Diamidofos Dieldrin Diflubenzuron Disulfoton Dithiocarbamates Endosulfan Endosulfan sulfate Endrin Fenpropathrin Fenvalerate HCH-alpha Heptachlor 3-Hydroxycarbofuran Imidacloprid Isobenzan Leptophos Lindane Linuron Malathion Maleic hydrazide Methoprene Metobromuron Mirex Monolinuron Naphthol Parathion Phosphine TDE
Percent Transfer of Intact Compound 1 0.2 - 0.27 ND ND - 2.7 1 - 11 0.3 - 20 13.5 - 15 5.2 1.51 1.2 - 83.3 2.64 ND 4 - 32 6.9 6 - 14.8 ND ND - 15.3 15.5 - 16.3 18.18 - 31.58 15.5 1.72 45 4-5 0.1 - 3.26 5.3 3.5 - 5.1 3 - 10 3.1 - 40 6.7 ND - 9.4 ND - 23 38.2 3.7 - 4 9 - 23 2.5 - 4.5 5.7 - 13.8 ND - 15.3 ND 0.007 - 63.75
few pesticides, such as DDT, maleic hydrazide, and several dithiocarbamates, where the transfer rates seem to be adequately investigated in a sufficient number of studies by different research groups [Atallah et al. (1051d, 21A03, 21A04), Chopra et al. (707, 708, 712, 714, 716), Guthrie et al. (1457, 1458), Hoffmann and Rathkamp (1756), and Hoffmann et al. (1761, 1767)].
XXI.E Methods for Analysis of Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators Numerous analytical methods, for example, GC-GC, GC-MS and HPLC, have been published for the determination of various classes of pesticides [Haeberer and Chortyk (470, 21A26), Schmeltz et al. (3483), Sagredos and Eckert (3379– 3381), Sagredos and Moser (3382), Nesemann and Seehofer (2699), Nesemann et al. (2697, 2698), Schmid and Rastetter (21A52), Schmid (3513), Dattilo et al. (904, 905), Guhlmann et al. (1451), Cai et al. (21A09), Carpenter and Frost (606), Nowell and Resek (21A50), Zaugg et al. (21A63), Werner et al. (21A60), Yamazaki and Tomara (21A62), and many others].
XXI.F Residues of Synthetic Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators Identified in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke The number of pesticide, plant growth regulators, and their decomposition products identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke listed in Table XXI-3 is 298. Of these, 102 have been identified in tobacco smoke, 294 in tobacco, and 98 in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. There are more natural pesticides and growth regulators known than are listed in Table XXI-3 because only selected examples of these natural pesticides and growth regulators, described by Danehower (21A16), are given.
ND = not determined All the agrochemicals listed are sold commercially and are trademarked/registered. Each should have a ® symbol after the product name, except the following agrochemicals: DDT, 3-hydroxycarbofuran, maleic hydrazide, phosphine and TDE.
*
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 938
11/13/08 5:45:25 PM
939
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
Table XXI-2 Degradation Products of Pesticides in Mainstream Smoke (1884, 21A19) Pesticide* Anilazine Azinphos-methyl Captan Carbaryl Carbofuran Chlorpyrifos DDT
Diamidafos Dieldrin Diflubenzuron Dithiocarbamates Endosulfan Imidacloprid Leptophos Lindane Linuron Malathion Maleic hydrazide Methoprene Metobromuron Mirex Monolinuron Naphthol TDE (DDD)
Degradation Products of the Intact Compound
References
o-chloroaniline Oxyguthion CO2 degradation products: 7 (not further characterized), CO2 degradation products: 2 (not further characterized), CO2 decomposition into unknown fragments 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDD = TDE), 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(pchlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE), 1-chloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDM = TDEE, 4,4’-dichlorobenzophenone (DCBP), bis(p-chlorophenyl)methane (BCPM), CO2, chloroform, methyl chloride, trans-4,4’-dichlorostilbene (DCS), DDD-olefins phenol chlorinated and dechlorinated degradation products
1457 419, 1457 21A37 1051d, 21A03, 21A04, 1051d, 1553, 21A03, 21A04 717 644, 707, 712, 714, 708, 758, 1000, 1051d, 1457, 1756, 1767, 2697, 3915, 21A18, 21A37, 21A38, 21A43
4-chloroaniline, 4-chlorophenylurea CO2, carbon disulphide, COS, ethylene thiourea, hydrogen sulfide ether CO2, CO (traces), urea compound degradation products: 4 (not further characterized), CO2 CO2 3,4-dichloroaniline CO2 acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, aminobutanoic acid, ammonia, aniline, butanoic acid, benzonitrile, CO2, CO, cyanide, 1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione, hydrazine (traces), indole, succinimide CO2, CO 4-bromoaniline degradation products: 3 (not further characterized), CO2 CO2, 4-chloroaniline degradation products: 6 (not further characterized) dechlorinated TDE, 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE), 1-chloro-2,2bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDM = TDEE), 4,4’-dichlorobenzophenone (DCBP), bis(p-chlorophenyl)methane (BCPM), trans-4,4’-dichlorostilbene (DCS)
21A53 124, 186, 21A10, 21A38, 21A44, 21A51 1619 21A12 1051d, 21A03, 21A04 21A36, 21A38 822 21A38 716, 1553, 1761, 2383-2385, 3724, 3725, 4274, 21A56 1243 822 1051d, 21A03, 21A04 822, 21A37 21A03, 21A04 415, 416, 714, 758, 1457, 3915
2527 21A57
All the agrochemicals listed are sold commercially and are trademarked/registered. Each should have a ® symbol after the product name, except the following agrochemicals: DDT, 3-hydroxycarbofuran, maleic hydrazide, phosphine and TDE.
*
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 939
11/13/08 5:45:25 PM
940
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 940
11/13/08 5:45:26 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
941
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 941
11/13/08 5:45:27 PM
942
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 942
11/13/08 5:45:29 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
943
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 943
11/13/08 5:45:30 PM
944
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 944
11/13/08 5:45:32 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
945
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 945
11/13/08 5:45:33 PM
946
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 946
11/13/08 5:45:41 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
947
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 947
11/13/08 5:45:49 PM
948
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 948
11/13/08 5:45:53 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
949
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 949
11/13/08 5:45:55 PM
950
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 950
11/13/08 5:45:57 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
951
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 951
11/13/08 5:45:59 PM
952
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 952
11/13/08 5:46:01 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
953
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 953
11/13/08 5:46:03 PM
954
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 954
11/13/08 5:46:06 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
955
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 955
11/13/08 5:46:13 PM
956
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 956
11/13/08 5:46:15 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
957
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 957
11/13/08 5:46:17 PM
958
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 958
11/13/08 5:46:20 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
959
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 959
11/13/08 5:46:22 PM
960
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 960
11/13/08 5:46:24 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
961
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 961
11/13/08 5:46:26 PM
962
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 962
11/13/08 5:46:28 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
963
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 963
11/13/08 5:46:31 PM
964
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 964
11/13/08 5:46:33 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
965
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 965
11/13/08 5:46:35 PM
966
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 966
11/13/08 5:46:44 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
967
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 967
11/13/08 5:46:46 PM
968
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 968
11/13/08 5:46:48 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
969
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 969
11/13/08 5:46:55 PM
970
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 970
11/13/08 5:46:57 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
971
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 971
11/13/08 5:46:59 PM
972
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 972
11/13/08 5:47:01 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
973
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 973
11/13/08 5:47:08 PM
974
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 974
11/13/08 5:47:10 PM
Pesticides and Growth Regulators
975
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 975
11/13/08 5:47:18 PM
976
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXI-3 (Continued) Synthetic and Natural Pesticides and Plant Growth Regulators in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C021.indd 976
11/13/08 5:47:21 PM
22
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Prior to discussing genes, nucleotides (DNA and RNA strands), and enzymes identified in tobacco, a general discussion of genetics, genes, nucleotides, and enzymes is appropriate (3973). There are numerous excellent reference texts that the reader can access for more detailed information on genetics [Davis and Nielsen (910a), Tso (3973), Acquaah (22A01), Bernardi (22A03), Griffiths et al. (22A12), Hartl and Jones (22A14)] and several sources of encyclopedic information (22A05, 22A17, 22A34). The general discussion will be followed by a review of work accomplished over many decades toward understanding the mysteries of tobacco genetics.
XXII.A General Discussion of Genetics Genetics is the science of heredity and variation in living organisms (22A12, 22A14, 22A17). Knowledge that desired characteristics were inherited has been used implicitly since prehistoric times for improving crop plants and animals through selective breeding. The science originated from human experience to improve crop and animals through the use of varied methods, such as domestication. However, the modern science of genetics, which seeks to understand the mechanisms of inheritance, only began with the work of Gregor Mendel in the mid-1800s (3973, 22A32). Inheritance is fundamentally a discrete process with specific traits that are passed on in an independent manner. These basic units of inheritance are now known as genes. In the cells of organisms, genes exist physically in the structure of the molecule DNA and the information contained in the genes is used to create and control the components of cells. Although genetics plays a large role in determining the appearance and behavior of organisms, it is the interaction of genetics with the environment an organism experiences that determines the ultimate outcome. For example, Nicotiana tabacum seeds planted and cultivated in different soils and under different climatic and agronomic conditions can produce different types of tobacco that have vastly different appearances and chemical composition, for example, Maryland vs. Virginia tobacco (3973). A gene is a set of segments of nucleic acid. A nucleic acid is a complex, high molecular weight biochemical macromolecule composed of nucleotide chains that convey genetic information. The most common nucleic acids are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA). Genes are arranged linearly in long chains of DNA sequences, called chromosomes. In eukaryotic organisms (which include plants and animals), each cell has its DNA arranged in multiple linear chromosomes. These DNA strands are often extremely long. The largest human chromosome, for example, is about 140 million base pairs in length (22A11).
Certain segments of nucleic acid contain the information necessary to produce a functional RNA product in a controlled manner. They contain regulatory regions dictating under what conditions this product is made, transcribed regions dictating the sequence of the RNA product, and/ or other functional sequence regions (22A23, 22A24). The physical development and phenotype, that is, a measurable characteristic, such as color or disease resistance, of organisms can be thought of as a product of genes interacting with each other and with the environment, and genes can be considered as units of inheritance. In cells, genes consist of a long strand of DNA that contains a promoter, which controls the activity of a gene, and coding sequences, which determine what the gene produces. When a gene is active, the coding sequence is copied in a process called transcription, producing an RNA copy of the gene’s information. This RNA can then direct the synthesis of proteins via the genetic code. The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or RNA sequences) is translated into proteins, that is, amino acid sequences and enzymes, by living cells. However, RNAs can also be used directly, for example, as part of the ribosome, which is a small, dense organelle in cells that assembles proteins. Molecules produced from gene expression, whether RNA or protein, are known as gene products. Most genes contain noncoding regions that do not code for the gene products, but can regulate gene expression. Additionally, there are large segments of the DNA that do not carry any genetic information. One single gene can lead to the synthesis of multiple proteins. The total complement of genes in an organism or cell is known as its genome. The estimated number of genes in the human genome has been repeatedly revised downward since the completion of the Human Genome Project, but current estimates place the human genome size at just under 3 billion base pairs and about 20000 to 25000 genes (22A15). The vast majority of living organisms encode their genes in long strands of DNA. DNA consists of a chain made from four types of nucleotide subunits: adenosine (A), cytidine (C), guanosine (G), and thymidine (T). Each nucleotide subunit consists of three components: a phosphate group, a deoxyribose sugar ring, and a nucleobase. Thus, nucleotides in DNA or RNA are typically called bases; consequently they are commonly referred to simply by their purine (adenine and guanine) or pyrimidine (cytosine and thymine) original base components. The most common form of DNA in a cell is a double helix structure, in which two individual DNA strands twist around each other in a right-handed spiral. In this structure, the base pairing rules specify that guanine pairs with cytosine and adenine pairs with thymine (each pair contains 977
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 977
11/13/08 5:48:16 PM
978
one purine and one pyrimidine). The base pairing between guanine and cytosine forms three hydrogen bonds, while the base pairing between adenine and thymine forms two hydrogen bonds. The two strands in a double helix must therefore be complementary, that is, their bases must align such that the adenines of one strand are paired with the thymines of the other strand, and so on. Due to the chemical composition of the pentose residues of the bases, DNA strands have directionality. One end of a DNA polymer contains an exposed hydroxyl group on the deoxyribose; this is known as the 3’ end of the molecule. The other end contains an exposed phosphate group; this is the 5’ end. The directionality of DNA is vitally important to many cellular processes, since double helices are necessarily directional (a strand running 5’-3’ pairs with a complementary strand running 3’-5’) and processes such as DNA replication occur in only one direction. All nucleic acid synthesis in a cell occurs in the 5’-3’ direction, because new monomers are added via a dehydration reaction that uses the exposed 3’ hydroxyl as a nucleophile. The expression of genes encoded in DNA begins by transcribing the gene into RNA, a second type of nucleic acid that is very similar to DNA, but monomers of which contain the sugar ribose rather than deoxyribose. RNA also contains the base uracil (U) in place of thymine. Genes that encode proteins are composed of a series of three-nucleotide sequences called codons. A codon is a set of any three adjacent bases in the DNA or RNA. There are sixty-four different codons, of which sixty-one specify the incorporation of an amino acid into a polypeptide chain while the remaining three are stop codons that signal the end of a polypeptide. For example, the DNA codon ACG via its complementary RNA codon CGU specifies the amino acid arginine. For another example, the DNA codon TAC via its complementary RNA codon GUA specifies the amino acid valine. There are three stop codons: uracil-adenosine-adenosine (UAA), uraciladenosine-guanosine (UAG), and uracil-guanosine-adenosine (UGA). They are also called termination codons or nonsense codons. The genetic code specifies the correspondence during protein translation between codons and amino acids. The genetic code is nearly the same for all known organisms. Many molecular definitions of a gene relate to their role in directing the production of specific proteins. Production of protein itself is made possible via certain enzymes known as polymerases. Various DNAs and RNAs could not be produced without these polymerases and therefore they are of primary importance. Numerous other enzymes are produced that control metabolic and catabolic processes (enzymatically), provide structural components, and perform regulatory functions in cells. A single gene can encode multiple enzymes, and an enzyme can have multiple genes. For example, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase in Nicotiana tabacum is a multimeric protein of sixteen peptides, eight small subunits (nuclear encoded) and eight large subunits (chloroplast encoded), thus two genes are responsible for this enzyme (3974c, 22A27, 22A35).
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Metabolic and catabolic enzymes are specialized proteins that catalyze chemical reactions. In enzymatic catalyzed reactions, the molecules at the beginning of the process are called substrates, and the enzyme converts them into different molecules, or products. Almost all processes in a biological cell need enzymes in order to occur at significant rates. Since enzymes are extremely selective for their substrates and accelerate only a few reactions from among many possibilities, the set of enzymes made in a cell determines which metabolic pathways occur in that cell (3973). Each type of enzyme is generally geared to interact chemically with only one particular substance or type of substance, termed a substrate. The two parts fit together, according to a widely accepted theory introduced in the 1890s by the German chemist Emil Fischer (1852–1919), as a key fits into a lock. Each type of enzyme has a specific three-dimensional shape that enables it to fit with the substrate, which has a complementary shape. The link between enzymes and substrates is so strong that enzymes often are named after the substrate involved, simply by adding ase to the name of the substrate. For example, lactase is the enzyme that catalyzes the breakdown of lactose, while urease catalyzes the chemical breakdown of urea. Enzymes bind their reactants or substrates at special folds and clefts, named active sites, in the structure of the substrate. Because numerous interactions are required in their work of catalysis, enzymes must have many active sites, and therefore can have molecular weights as high as one million.
XXII.B Tobacco Genetics Tobacco has been used in one form or another in civilized society for nearly five centuries. Eventually in the late nineteenth century, investigations as to its composition began but they were not particularly numerous. The major driving force in the escalation in the mid-twentieth century of studies on tobacco composition was the attempt to define (1) its components that contributed to the acceptability of the taste and aroma of tobacco itself and its smoke to consumers and (2) the precursors in tobacco of the toxicants in its smoke (3973, 22A30). In 1972, Tso (22A30) remarked: The characteristics of cigarette smoke are functions of the physical and chemical properties of leaf tobacco which make the cigarette. Smoke constituents may be modified by changing leaf characteristics. The questions are: What kinds of changes are needed? and, how can these changes be achieved?
Tobacco genetics is a rather new field of study although research on tobacco to understand its physical and chemical makeup has been a goal of tobacco scientists for over a hundred years. The initial problem in undertaking the goal of trying to understand the origins of the chemical and physical essence of tobacco was that our understanding of life processes, in general, was inadequate prior to the discovery of the structure and function of DNA. Additionally, the life
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 978
11/13/08 5:48:16 PM
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
processing functions of numerous DNAs and RNAs in tobacco were not understood. Although scientists had an empirical knowledge of how the genetics worked via the tobacco breeding program, basic fundamental knowledge was lacking until technology was developed to execute the search for information on the genetic code for tobacco (3973). Regardless, research directed toward the ultimate goal of understanding of the fundamental life processes of tobacco began. The early genetic research was conducted in the areas of tobacco breeding (as a means to improve leaf characteristics, quality, and disease resistance) and the chemical composition of tobacco via identification of extractable material in tobacco, for example, amino acids, various proteins, and enzymes (424a, 2341a, 3972, 3973, 22A06, 22A29, 22A30). It was not until the 1970s and 1980s with the development of new analytical and genetic tools, such as HPLC and GC-MS, instrumental polymerase chain reaction (PCR), plant transformation, genetic mapping with molecular markers, gene tagging, and positional cloning, that significant progress was possible in the understanding of tobacco genetics directed towards improved pest resistance, yield, and quality (424a). The chemical composition of tobacco smoke is highly dependent on the physical and chemical properties of the leaf tobaccos used in cigarette manufacture. It is a basic tenet that the biological properties of cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) and cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) can be improved through changes in the genetics of tobacco. Numerous types of chemical and physical modifications performed on tobacco, for example, tobacco extraction, tobacco reconstitution, tobacco expansion, inclusion of tobacco substitutes, have indicated that this tenet is possible (1375a, 1375b). Thousands of genes, nucleotides, and enzymes have been identified in tobacco. Although they do not transfer intact to MSS, hundreds of decomposition products from their combustion and pyrolysis products have been identified. Many of the combustion and pyrolysis products found in MSS and CSC have been called “Hoffmann analytes” because of their alleged adverse biological effects, for example, quinoline, HCN, and several other undesirable nitrogenous compounds, certain PAHs, aza-arenes, and phenolics (3974c). It is hoped that through genetic modifications precursors in tobacco of the toxicants in its smoke can be altered significantly to improve the safety of tobacco products (3794b, 3974c, 3975, 3984, 3976, 22A30).
XXII.C Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes Identified in Tobacco The sixty-five species related to Nicotiana tabacum represent sources of a divergent germplasm for biochemical and physical variations (3793, 22A19, 22A30). These species differ widely in growth habit and in chromosome numbers (3793). Tobacco breeding via interspecific hybridization has been the major tool for agricultural scientists to improve the health and quality of tobacco (22A30). Possible approaches that plant scientists can take to modify tobacco leaf have been
979
reviewed by Tso (22A31). Modifications discussed by Tso (3973, 22A31) involved genetic and cultural modification, nitrogen fertilization technology, leaf and plant population, the physiological stage of topping, and pesticide treatments. Post-harvest modifications were also discussed (22A31), as leaf composition is markedly affected by the curing process, aging, or other treatment of cured leaves (4005). The U.S. Nicotiana Germplasm Collection was initiated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 1934 as a resource for tobacco breeders. The collection currently consists of approximately 1244 tobacco introductions, 656 cultivars, and 224 accessions representing fifty-nine Nicotiana species, fifty interspecific hybrids, and a newly introduced set of mutants (22A19). The gene pool of the Nicotiana Germplasm Collection represents enormous possibilities for researchers in plant pathology, plant molecular biology, and biotechnology to modify and improve the quality, yield, and safety of tobacco. It has been estimated that the genetic makeup of tobacco includes 25000 to 50000 genes (22A22). Nicotiana tabacum has a very large genome size compared with other cultivated solanaceous plants (22A13, 22A21, 22A22). At approximately 4.5 billion base pairs, it is 1.5 times the size of the human genome (22A13, 22A21, 22A22). There are at least two major (and several minor) initiatives to sequence the tobacco genome; the Tobacco Genome Initiative (TGI) and the European Sequencing of Tobacco Project (ESTobacco). Both projects have an ultimate goal of sequencing the greater part of the tobacco genome. Although tobacco has been cultivated for more than 500 years and is a crop of great economic significance, relatively little information exists on its genome structure and organization. The overall goal of the TGI is to sequence and annotate more than 90% of the open reading frames in the genome of cultivated tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum. Nicotiana tabacum is an amphiploid species (2n = 48) likely resulting from an interspecific cross between Nicotiana sylvestris (2n = 24) and Nicotiana tomentosiformis (2n = 24), and at approximately 4.5 billion base pairs has a very large genome size compared with other cultivated solanaceous plants. A complete gene catalog will provide the raw information to investigate physiological and genetic processes in the tobacco plant, a widely used model in plant biotechnology. Tobacco genomics may lead to the elucidation of genetic factors that impact constituents associated with tobacco consumption. Improving our understanding of these processes may potentially contribute to achieving the goal of reducing the harm associated with cigarette smoking. In addition, important agronomic traits such as disease and pest resistance genes could be identified, and thus could be available for use in traditional and molecular breeding projects the goal of which is to enhance the performance of tobacco as a crop in different environments. Finally, Nicotiana tabacum is a member of the agriculturally important Solanaceae family, which also includes tomato, potato, eggplant, and pepper crop plants. All of these plants may benefit from gene discovery in tobacco. The TGI is housed in the laboratories of the Plant Pathology Department of the North Carolina State University (NCSU) Centennial
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 979
11/13/08 5:48:17 PM
980
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Campus, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (Raleigh, North Carolina). NCSU will make the TGI data available to authorized academic researchers. The Tobacco Genome Initiative is supported by Philip Morris USA, Inc. (22A13, 22A21, 22A22). The TGI has identified a large percentage of genes in Nicotiana tabacum by utilizing a combination of strategies. Researchers at TGI have employed a methyl filtration approach to identify gene-rich regions in Nicotiana tabacum in order to expedite the gene discovery process. As of 2006, TGI had sequenced 1700000 lanes of methyl filtered clones and observed a dramatic increase in gene discovery in filtered vs. nonfiltered libraries. TGI has also performed expressed sequence tag (EST) sequencing from various Nicotiana libraries and to date has sequenced over 80000 ESTs. Genes tagged by these two strategies have been used as probes to identify bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones for more targeted sequencing. Numerous BACs have been sequenced, revealing information about both gene structure and genome organization in Nicotiana species (22A13, 22A21). The TGI had a projected completion date in late 2007. The TGI was completed in June 2008. The second major tobacco genomic project is centered in Europe and was started in 2006. It is known as the European Sequencing of Tobacco Project or ESTobacco. This project is being conducted by Advanced Technologies (Cambridge) Ltd. (a wholly owned subsidiary of British American Tobacco) and Institut du Tabac de Bergerac (part of the Altadis Group). The aim of the ESTobacco project is to be complementary to other projects currently underway concerning the tobacco genome. The strategy of ESTobacco is to sequence only genes expressed in tobacco and not the whole genome. They believe that the size of the tobacco genome is too large to be totally sequenced. The tobacco genome is thought to be about twenty-nine times larger than that of Arabidopsis thaliana (Table XXII-1). The plan of the ESTobacco project is to investigate three commercial varieties of tobacco used throughout the world: K326 for the flue-cured type, and Burley 21 and TN86 for the burley types. To obtain the major genes, the organs of the plant (seeds, roots, stems, midribs, laminae, and flowers) prepared at different stages of development (germination, young seedlings, before and after topping, maturity) will be used as a basis for this work. A large tobacco EST dataset was obtained from eleven normalized cDNA libraries comprising 56000 clones. It is envisioned that a DNA array designed with these sequences will allow the large-scale study of Table XXII-1 Relative Size of Genomes and Number of Genes by Species Species Arabidopsis thaliana Homo sapiens Nicotiana tabacum
Genome Size (Mb)
Number of Genes
125 3000 3500 to 4500 (est.)
25500 20000 to 25000 25000 to 50000 (est.)
the genes expressed in tobacco. This new tool should lead to the acceleration of programs already underway concerning the origins of risks associated with tobacco and provide strategies for harm reduction. To encourage a wide range of initiatives on tobacco plant genetic, as with other crops, the resulting sequences obtained during the ESTobacco project will be available to the worldwide scientific community through public access databases (22A08, 22A26). As whole gene sequences and nucleotide sequences (DNA and RNA sequenced strands) become available they are being entered into GenBank (22A10). GenBank is the National Institute of Health (NIH) genetic sequence database, an annotated collection of all publicly available DNA sequences (22A02). There were approximately 65369091950 bases in 61132599 sequence records in the traditional GenBank divisions and 80369977826 bases in 17960667 sequence records in the Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) division as of August 2006. GenBank is part of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration, which comprises the DNA DataBank of Japan (DDBJ), the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), and GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Information located in GenBank can be accessed on the Internet (1282a). Within the next few years, our understanding of the tobacco genome will be greatly improved. It is anticipated or predicted that advances in tobacco genomics will lead to the next major improvement in safety and health associated with cigarette smoking via genetic modifications of various Nicotiana species. The symposium at the 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference featured presentations from representatives from the TGI and the ESTobacco projects. Updates on both projects were given, as well as information on how new types of biotechnologies are being employed to provide both fundamental and practical information on genes that could be used to improve pest resistance, quality, yield of tobacco, and the safety of tobacco products (22A09, 22A20). In the late 1950s and through the 1960s enormous breakthroughs in DNA enzymology took place. For example, in 1955 Kornberg et al. (22A18) isolated DNA polymerase, and Weiss and Richardson (22A33) isolated DNA ligase in 1967. Smith and Wilcox (22A28) and Kelley and Smith (22A16) isolated and characterized the first sequence specific restriction nuclease in 1970. These enzymes, respectively, play roles in the synthesis of DNA molecules, the attachment of two or more DNA molecules to one another, and the breaking of DNA molecules into fragments. Importantly, these enzymes make it possible to create entirely new kinds of DNA molecules and, equally important, to manipulate the functioning of the genes located on these new molecules. The types of enzymes that Smith, Wilcox, and Kelley (22A16, 22A28) discovered are called restriction enzymes. Restriction enzymes recognize and cut specific short sequences of DNA. They are found in bacteria, which use the enzymes to digest invading DNA. The bacteria add methyl groups to their own DNA to protect them from digestion. Molecular biologists began using these enzymes, along with DNA polymerase and DNA ligase, in the early 1970s to cut, manipulate, and analyze
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 980
11/13/08 5:48:18 PM
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
pieces of DNA in a predictable and reproducible way. The enzymes became an important, early tool for mapping genomes. There are over 900 types of restriction enzymes that have been isolated from over 230 strains of bacteria. Some of these enzymes provide specific sequence segments of DNA and some do not. About 180 restriction enzymes are commercially available. There have been hundreds of thousands of nucleotide sequences (DNA and RNA sequenced strands) that have been produced via restriction enzymes from various forms of DNA and RNA in tobacco (22A13, 22A21). Not every DNA strand holds or is encoded with genetic information. There are considerable lengths of DNA that contain no genetic information or the function of which has yet to be identified. These segments are called “junk” or “non-coding” DNA. For example, about 97% of the human genome has been designated as “non-coding” (22A24). So, of the hundreds of thousands of nucleotide sequences that have been produced from various forms of DNA and RNA in tobacco, only a small percentage contains the essential genetic information needed to direct its life processes. However, all of these DNA and RNA strands serve a very important purpose during the construction of genomes. By employing sophisticated computer programs that can identify patterns in the bases in the DNA fragments, DNA fragments can be sequenced. “Fingerprinting” of large insert genomic fragment libraries, also known as BAC (bacterial artificial chromosomes) clones can lead to the construction of a physical map of a genome. These maps are critical to genome sequencing, positional cloning, and understanding the relative organization of genes and markers. When BAC libraries are arranged into maps that reflect the DNA sequence in a chromosome, they provide maximal information and utility. Generally, these BAC libraries are deposited in the GenBank. For example, BAC clone libraries for Nicotiana tabacum, currently being compiled as part of the TGI and ESTobacco projects, are being deposited in the GenBank. There are vast arrays of enzymes that have been identified in tobacco (429b, 429c, 3973). Plant enzymes perform valuable functions almost as soon as seeds are planted and continue to be important even through the tobacco curing process. Enzymes are in fact essential molecules that assimilate carbon dioxide from air (via photosynthesis), nitrogen by roots from the soil, and utilize hydrogen liberated by dehydrogenation from the components of the Krebs tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle to produce a variety of organic acids, for example, oxaloacetic and α-ketoglutaric acids. The net result of nitrogen assimilation is the utilization of a portion of newly photosynthesized carbon chains into the nitrogenous pool. When the nitrogen supply is abundant there will be more synthesis of amino acids, for example, aspartic and glutamic acids, and nicotine, and less sugars and starch. If the nitrogen supply is limited, there will be an excess accumulation of acetate in the TCA cycle, which results in higher production of carbohydrates, fats, volatile oils, resins, and polyterpenes. Tobacco enzymes efficiently and effectively control and regulate the type and level of tobacco constituents available to the plant for growth. The variations in leaf
981
characteristics, texture, color, porosity, and combustibility, quality, for example, aroma and flavor based on chemical composition, and yield (poundage per acre/hectare) are a reflection of the genetic makeup of the plant, agronomic practices, soil types, and the environmental conditions (3972, 3973, 22A29, 22A30). Enzymes can either work individually or in teams. In a metabolic pathway (like the TCA cycle) several enzymes work together in a specific order, one enzyme takes the product of another enzyme as a substrate. Two sources of information on hundreds of enzymes that have been identified in tobacco are BRENDA and KEGG (429b, 429c). BRENDA: The Comprehensive Enzyme Information System is a database of enzymes and enzyme pathways. It was developed and is maintained at the Institute of Biochemistry at the University of Cologne and is available through the Internet at http://www.brenda.uni-koeln.de/. KEGG stands for the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. KEGG is a bioinformatics resource that was developed and is maintained as part of the research projects of the Kanehisa Laboratories in the Bioinformatics Center of Kyoto University and the Human Genome Center of the University of Tokyo. The phase of plant growth that extends from maturity to actual death (called senescence) is characterized by an accumulation of metabolic products, increase in respiratory rate, and a loss of dry matter (3973). At the senescence stage, enzyme activities (especially hydrolytic and other degradative enzyme systems) are intensified. These systems are responsible for breakdown of functional and structural components of the cell, such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids. The latter stage of senescence resembles the early stage of leaf curing. Curing is a vital process which falls into the category of starvation phenomena or inanition of excised plant parts (3972, 3973). The most conspicuous chemical conversions during curing involve two phases. The first phase is dominated by hydrolytic enzymes and occurs in either flue curing or air curing. In this phase, disaccharides and polysaccharides are hydrolyzed to simple sugars; proteins are hydrolyzed to amino acids which undergo oxidative deamination; and the pectins and pentosans are hydrolyzed to pectic acid, uronic acid, and methyl alcohol. The second phase is dominated by oxidative reactions and takes place mostly in air-curing processes. Among the conversions are the following: oxidation of simple sugars to acids, oxygen and water; the increased oxidative deamination of amino acids leads to the formation of ammonia and amides, particularly asparagine; changes in organic acids, including conversion of malic to citric acid and also decarboxylations; and the oxidative and polymerization of phenols to brown products. There is a small decrease in alkaloids and some loss of dry weight (3972, 3973). Although not discussed specifically, the tobacco plant contains many thousands of different proteins that are produced by the plant to perform both structural and functional roles. The abundance and types of proteins differ according to the plant organ and cell type being considered. And at the cellular level, proteins with functional roles in chloroplasts and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 981
11/13/08 5:48:18 PM
982
mitochondria may be encoded by the small DNA genomes of those organelles, or may be specified by nuclear genes and imported into those organelles. A significant percentage of proteins in the tobacco leaf are those involved in photosynthesis. This complex process is mediated by the action of hundreds of enzymes involved in the capture of energy from sunlight and the use of that energy to assimilate carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. A key enzyme responsible for this process is ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (sometimes referred to as RuBP carboxylase, or simply “Rubisco”) (22A35). It is an enzyme that has a dual function in that it catalyzes the carboxylation and oxygenation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate. Therefore, it catalyzes the crucial reactions of both photosynthesis and photorespiration, the ratio of these two processes determine plant productivity (3973, 3974c). This important enzyme is the most abundant individual leaf protein, and has been proposed as the most important and abundant single protein in nature. On the other hand, the majority of nicotine biosynthesis occurs in root tissues, so the enzymes involved in that process are expressed most abundantly in roots. Before the advent of modern plant biochemistry and molecular biology, tobacco leaves, as well as the leaves of other higher plants, were considered to possess two broad classes of proteins based on their solubility properties during extraction. Of the total tobacco leaf proteins, approximately half are “soluble” and half “insoluble.” The most abundant soluble protein came to be known as “Fraction-1 protein” (F-1 protein, shown to be primarily RuBP carboxylase), a material that can constitute as much as 50% of the total soluble tobacco leaf protein. During the 1980s, this material was considered as a potential source of food protein and for a number of other food applications due to its abundance and a number of other favorable properties. The remaining leaf protein, consisting of a multitude of smaller soluble proteins and unfractionated protein in the cytoplasm and chloroplast, was referred to as “Fraction-2 protein” (F-2 protein) (3973, 3974c). In addition to tobacco proteins having functional roles such as RuBP carboxylase, tobacco and other plants contain proteins the primary role of which is structural. For example, extensins, a family of glycoproteins rich in hydroxyproline residues, may constitute as much as 15% of the primary cell wall. Extensins are incorporated into the carbohydrate structure of cell walls and are thought to help provide structural support as cell walls develop. Contemporary research has tended to concentrate on the identification and function of individual proteins that play key roles in plant growth, development, and response to environmental cues. While much of this research has shifted from tobacco to the more easily manipulated model plant system Arabidopsis thaliana, tobacco continues to be the subject of considerable research due to the historical database of tobacco-specific information, its ease of genetic manipulation, and
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
its interesting biochemical pathways for alkaloid biosynthesis. This research has shown tobacco to possess an amazing diversity of proteins the roles of which continue to be elucidated. Tobacco “leaf protein” by itself contributes little to smoking quality, but it is a major precursor of hundreds of tobacco smoke components, for example, numerous nitrogenous compounds and amino acids. Similarly, other major tobacco components such as the carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, pigments, polyphenols, fatty compounds, phytosterols, and many primary or secondary compounds play a significant role in producing a myriad of tobacco smoke compounds (3972, 3973, 3974c). Plant material and smoke composition, are closely interrelated. Properties of leaf material can be modified through genetic and biochemical manipulation from seed to curing (22A30).
In dealing with an organic material as complex as tobacco, there are limitations in the range of possible changes that can be made to improve the biological interaction and metabolic balance within a plant system, and at the same time improve or alter the smoke composition and ultimately the biological activity of the smoke. The challenge that faces the tobacco industry today in light of the numerous possibilities that will come from the genetic mapping of Nicotiana tabacum is the development of new tobacco types that can satisfy farmers, manufacturers, regulators, and consumers in quality and tobacco safety. Solutions to the questions posed by Tso in 1972 (22A30) as to “what kinds of changes are needed (to produce safer tobacco products)?” And “how can these changes be achieved?” may be attainable in the future with the new-found knowledge from the genetic mapping of the tobacco genome. Table XXII-2 is a catalog of the genes, nucleotides (DNA and RNA strands), enzymes, and a few major proteins identified to date in tobacco. The format of this table differs from those in most other chapters since only one of the tobacco constituents is transferred intact to MSS (phytuberin). As a result, the Tobacco Smoke column was deleted from Table XXII-2. The catalog contains 491 entries. This number of entries represents only a very small fraction of the genes identified and nucleotides created recently during the tobacco genome projects. As more time passes, the totality of the genes and nucleotides identified in the tobacco genome will be published or made available in databases for researchers to access. The majority of the known enzymes identified in tobacco are contained in the catalog.
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful to Dr. Gary Hellmann and Dr. Lynwood Sawyer for review of this chapter.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 982
11/13/08 5:48:19 PM
983
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco 7DEOH;;,,(Q]\PHVJHQHVFORQHVLQWREDFFR
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
$FHW\OVHULQHVXOIK\GU\ODVH
$FHW\OWUDQVIHUDVHFKORUDPSKHQLFRO $F\OWUDQVIHUDVHJO\FHUROSKRVSKDWH$UDELGRSVLVWKDOLDQD FORQH%;%%UHGXFHG
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
D GD
$GHQRV\OWUDQVIHUDVHPHWKLRQLQH
EG
$GHQ\O\OWUDQVIHUDVHVXOIDWH
EG
$OEXPLQ
$OEXPLQVEORRGVHUXP
E
$OGRODVHIUXFWRVHGLSKRVSKDWH
E
$OGRODVHSKRVSKRNHWRGHR[\KHSWRQDWH
E
$OGRODVHSKRVSKRNHWRGHR[\KHSWRQDWHWREDFFRFORQH 1W'$+36SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
E
$PLQRDF\OWUDQVIHUDVH
EG
$PLQRSHSWLGDVH
$
$PLQRSHSWLGDVHF\WRVRO
$PLQRSHSWLGDVHOHXFLQH
$PLQRSURS\OWUDQVIHUDVHSXWUHVFLQH
E EG
$PLQRWUDQVIHUDVH
EG
$PLQRWUDQVIHUDVHDODQLQH
EGG
$PLQRWUDQVIHUDVHDVSDUWDWH
EG
$PLQRWUDQVIHUDVHJOXWDPDWHJO\R[\ODWH
EG
$PLQRWUDQVIHUDVHRUQLWKLQHNHWRDFLG
EG
$PLQRWUDQVIHUDVHVHULQHJO\R[\ODWH
EG
$PPRQLDO\DVHSKHQ\ODODQLQH
D
$P\ODVH
G
$P\ODVHD
$P\ODVHE
$P\ODVHLVR
E
$QK\GUDVHFDUERQDWH
$S\UDVH
E
&DUEDPR\OWUDQVIHUDVHDVSDUWDWH
E
&DUER[\ODVH
EE
&DUER[\ODVHSKRVSKRHQROS\UXYDWHSKRVSKDWH
E
&DUER[\ODVHSKRVSKRS\UXYDWH &DUER[\ODVHULEXORVHGLSKRVSKDWH &DUER[\ODVHULEXORVHGLSKRVSKDWH1LFRWLDQDV\OYHVWULVFORQH 1\66VPDOOVXEXQLWSUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
E DD D
&DUER[\SHSWLGDVH
&DWDODVH
E
&HOOXODVH
E
&KLWLQDVH
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 983
11/13/08 5:48:21 PM
984
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
&KLWLQDVH1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQLVRHQ]\PHUHGXFHG
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
D
&KLWLQDVH1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP[DQWKLFORQHS%6&/ LVRHQ]\PH,,,SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
D
&KLWLQDVHWREDFFREDVLFLVRHQ]\PH,,,SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
G
&KLWLQDVHWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD&+1EDVLFLVRHQ]\PH SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
$
&KLWLQDVHWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD&+1EDVLFLVRHQ]\PH UHGXFHG
D
&KLWLQDVHWREDFFRFORQHJHQHFKL9SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
E
&KORURSK\OODVH &RHQ]\PH$ &RHQ]\PH$6K\GURJHQEXWDQHGLRDWH
&U\SWRJHLQ
&\FODVHIDUQHV\OS\URSKRVSKDWH &\WRFKURPHE &\WRFKURPHF
&\WRFKURPHR[LGDVH
'HDF\ODVH
E E D E E D$
'HFDUER[\ODVH
'HFDUER[\ODVHDGHQRV\OPHWKLRQLQH
ED
'HFDUER[\ODVHDUJLQLQH
'HFDUER[\ODVHJOXWDPDWH
ED
'HFDUER[\ODVHJO\FLQH 'HFDUER[\ODVHRUQLWKLQH
ED
'HFDUER[\ODVHS\UXYDWH
ED
'HFDUER[\ODVHXURSRUSK\ULQRJHQ
ED
'HK\GUDWDVHFDUERQDWH
E
'HK\GUDWDVHWKUHRQLQH
E
'HK\GURJHQDVH
D
'HK\GURJHQDVHJOXFRVHSKRVSKDWH
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHJOXWDPDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHJOXWDPDWHQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQH GLQXFOHRWLGHSKRVSKDWH
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHJOXWDPLFDFLG
'HK\GURJHQDVHJOXWDWKLRQHDVFRUEDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHJO\FHUDOGHK\GHSKRVSKDWH
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHKRPRVHULQH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHLVRFLWUDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHLVRFLWUDWHQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH SKRVSKDWH
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHPDODWH
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHPDODWHGHFDUER[\ODWLQJ QLFRWLQDPLGH DGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGHSKRVSKDWH
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHPDODWHQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH SKRVSKDWH
G
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 984
11/13/08 5:48:23 PM
985
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
'HK\GURJHQDVHPDODWHR[DODFHWDWHGHFDUER[\ODWLQJ QLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGHSKRVSKDWH 'HK\GURJHQDVHPHWK\OHQHWHWUDK\GURIRODWH 'HK\GURJHQDVHQLFRWLQH
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
ED ED ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHSKRVSKRJOXFRQDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHSKRVSKRJOXFRQDWHGHFDUER[\ODWLQJ
G
'HK\GURJHQDVHSUROLQH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHTXLQDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH SKRVSKDWH TXLQRQH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH TXLQRQH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH SKRVSKDWHTXLQRQH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH SKRVSKDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHVKLNLPDWH
ED
'HK\GURJHQDVHVXFFLQDWH
D
'HK\GURJHQDVH[DQWKLQH
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG$UDELGRSVLVWKDOLDQDFORQH7$< JHQH8EF$WXELTXLWLQFDUULHUHQ]\PH(PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG$UDELGRSVLVWKDOLDQDVWUDLQ+H\QKROG JO\FHUROSKRVSKDWHDF\OWUDQVIHUDVHPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDJHQHSPD SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDV\OYHVWULVFORQH1\66 ULEXORVHGLSKRVSKDWHFDUER[\ODVHVPDOOVXEXQLWJHQH
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDV\OYHVWULVFORQH \D'&\D'&JHQHSVD'DSURWHLQ'PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 985
11/13/08 5:48:25 PM
986
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH1H,)$ SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
7REDFFR
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH8EL8JHQH 8EL8SRO\XELTXLWLQSOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFY65OHDIFORQH 1WIDGZIDWW\DFLGGHVDWXUDVHP51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQ NLORGDOWRQSURWHLQPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFKLWLQDVH LVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQH 1H,)$SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$LVRIRUP JHQH
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQH S02*RVPRWLQPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQH S72/RVPRWLQPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRH[WHQVLQOLNHSURWHLQ SUHFXUVRUVSHFLI\LQJ
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFKLWLQDVHDFLGLFLVRHQ]\PH,,, PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EG
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFKLWLQDVHEDVLFLVRHQ]\PH,,, PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EG
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFKORURSODVWFORQH/ ULERVRPHSURWHLQ/PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD$JHQH5% SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
HE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD$JHQH5%
HE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD&+1 FKLWLQDVHEDVLFLVRHQ]\PHJHQH
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHJHQHFKL9FKLWLQDVH SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHF$JHQHFKL9 FKLWLQDVHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHFSEDQWLIXQJDO SURWHLQ&3%PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH(SURWHLQ35JHQH
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH**JHQH 1SJSOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD7)/2JHQH 1)/H[RQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD7)/2JHQH 1)/H[RQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD7)/2JHQH 1)/H[RQIUDJPHQW
ED
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 986
5HIHUHQFHV
11/13/08 5:48:27 PM
987
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH1W'$+36SKRVSKR NHWRGHR[\KHSWRQDWHDOGRODVHPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH207FDWHFKRO PHWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHLVRHQ]\PH,,PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OXHQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHJHQHFRGLQJUHJLRQ
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OXHQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHJHQHFRGLQJUHJLRQ
EF
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHSF*6JOXWDPLQH V\QWKHWDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS*/HQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS*/HQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS*/HQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
FE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH352%SURWHLQ7/ PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS7*)JHQH1)/ H[RQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS7*)JHQH1)/ H[RQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS7*)JHQH1)/ H[RQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS9.RVPRWLQ PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH76&ULERVRPH SURWHLQ/PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRHQGREJOXFDQDVH LVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRH[WHQVLQOLNHSURWHLQ DPLQRDFLGIUDJPHQWVSHFLI\LQJ
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRH[WHQVLQOLNHSURWHLQDPLQR DFLGIUDJPHQWVSHFLI\LQJ
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFROHDIFXUOYLUXVFRDWSURWHLQ JHQH
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRULERVRPHSURWHLQ/ PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRVWUDLQ1.JHQHRHH$ SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRVWUDLQ1.JHQHRHH$
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRWKLRUHGR[LQKJHQHSOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRWKLRUHGR[LQPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG$UDELGRSVLVWKDOLDQDVWUDLQ+H\QKROG JO\FHUROSKRVSKDWHDF\OWUDQVIHUDVHPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 987
11/13/08 5:48:29 PM
988
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG$UDELGRSVLVWKDOLDQDWKLRUHGR[LQK PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
7REDFFR
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDDODWDFORQH1D353J SUROLQHULFKSURWHLQ353JHQHSOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,) $SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU 51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,) $SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU 51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,) $SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU 51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,) $SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$PHVVHQJHU 51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,) $SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$LVRIRUP PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,) $SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$LVRIRUP PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH S62'FRSSHU]LQFVXSHUR[LGHGLVPXWDVHPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH S62'FRSSHU]LQFVXSHUR[LGHGLVPXWDVHPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDV\OYHVWULVFORQH \D'&\D'&JHQHSVD'DSURWHLQ'PHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQH 1H,)$SURWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$LVRIRUP JHQHSOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQH S02*RVPRWLQPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLG1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQH S02*RVPRWLQVSHFLI\LQJSOXV DQG IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFKORURSODVWFORQH/ ULERVRPHSURWHLQ/PHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH(3636 HQROS\UXYR\OVKLNLPDWHSKRVSKDWHV\QWKDVHPHVVHQJHU 51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQGIODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQH1W'$+36SKRVSKR NHWRGHR[\KHSWRQDWHDOGRODVHPHVVHQJHU51$ FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OXHQGR EJOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHJHQHFRGLQJUHJLRQSOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EF
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 988
5HIHUHQFHV
11/13/08 5:48:31 PM
989
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OXHQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHJHQHFRGLQJUHJLRQSOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHSF*6JOXWDPLQH V\QWKHWDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\ SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS*/HQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS*/HQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS*/HQGRE JOXFDQDVHLVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
FE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHS0*H[WHQVLQOLNH SURWHLQPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRHQGREJOXFDQDVH LVRHQ]\PHPHVVHQJHU51$FRPSOHPHQWDU\SOXV DQG IODQNLQJUHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRH[WHQVLQOLNHSURWHLQ DPLQRDFLG&WHUPLQDOIUDJPHQWVSHFLI\LQJSOXV IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
DE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRH[WHQVLQOLNHSURWHLQ DPLQRDFLG&WHUPLQDOIUDJPHQWVSHFLI\LQJSOXV IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
EE
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRH[WHQVLQOLNHSURWHLQ DPLQRDFLG&WHUPLQDOIUDJPHQWVSHFLI\LQJSOXV IODQNLQJ UHJLRQIUDJPHQW
ED
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGG$7*77&7&7&7777$$ 7**7**77&777$*
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGG&$7&$&*7*$*$7$$* $*&&*&&$ GRXEOHVWUDQGHGFRPSOHPHQWDU\
E
'HR[\ULERQXFOHLFDFLGG7$$$*7&$$$*$$777 &$$7*7&$&$ GRXEOHVWUDQGHGFRPSOHPHQWDU\
E
'HVDWXUDVHIDWW\DFLGZ
EF
D
'HVDWXUDVHIDWW\DFLGZWREDFFRFORQH1WIDG
D
'HVDWXUDVHSK\WRHQH
E
'LDSKRUDVH 'LVPXWDVHVXSHUR[LGH 'LVPXWDVHVXSHUR[LGH1LFRWLDQDSOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH S62'FRSSHU]LQFSURWHLQPRLHW\UHGXFHG
(GHVWLQ
E E E E
(VWHUDVH
(VWHUDVHSHFWLQ
G
E
)HUUHGR[LQV
E)UXFWRIXUDQRVLGDVH
)UXFWRVLGDVH
*DODFWRVLGDVH
EE EE
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 989
11/13/08 5:48:33 PM
990
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
7REDFFR
*HQ%DQN'
D
*HQ%DQN'
D
*HQ%DQN'
DE
*HQ%DQN/
DD
*HQ%DQN/
D
*HQ%DQN/
D
*HQ%DQN/
D
*HQ%DQN/
D
*HQ%DQN/
D
*HQ%DQN/
*HQ%DQN0
D D
*HQ%DQN0
D
*HQ%DQN0
D
*HQ%DQN0
D
*HQ%DQN0
D
*HQ%DQN0
D
*HQ%DQN0
*HQ%DQN;
D D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
D
*HQ%DQN;
*HQ%DQN=
D D
*HQ%DQN=
D
*HQ%DQN=
D
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 990
5HIHUHQFHV
11/13/08 5:48:35 PM
991
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
*HQ%DQN=
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
DD
*HQ%DQN=
DD
*HQ%DQN=
DD
*HQ%DQN=
D
*HQ%DQN=
D
*HQ%DQN=
D
*HQ%DQN=
D
*OREXOLQVJ
E*OXFDQDVH
D
*OXFDQDVHHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS*/LVRHQ]\PH
DD
*OXFDQDVHHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS*/LVRHQ]\PH
DD
*OXFDQDVHHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS*/LVRHQ]\PH
FD
*OXFDQDVHHQGREWREDFFRLVRHQ]\PH
DE
*OXFDQDVHHQGR E
ED
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OX LVRHQ]\PHVLJQDOSHSWLGH
DE
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OX LVRHQ]\PHVLJQDOSHSWLGH /WKUHRQLQH/JOXWDPLF DFLG
DD
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OX LVRHQ]\PHSURWHLQPRLHW\
DD
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS%6*OXF LVRHQ]\PHSURWHLQPRLHW\
DD
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS*/ LVRHQ]\PHSURWHLQPRLHW\
DD
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS*/ LVRHQ]\PHSURWHLQPRLHW\
DD
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRFORQHS*/ LVRHQ]\PHSURWHLQPRLHW\
FD
*OXFDQDVHSUHSURHQGREWREDFFRLVRHQ]\PHSURWHLQ PRLHW\
ED
*OXFRVLGDVHD
E
*OXFRVLGDVHE
*OXFRVLGDVHDP\OR
E
*OXFRV\OWUDQVIHUDVH
E
*OXFRV\OWUDQVIHUDVHXULGLQHGLSKRVSKRJOXFRVHEJOXFDQ
E
Ǻ'*OXFRV\OWUDQVIHUDVHXULGLQHGLSKRVSKRJOXFRVHIODYRQRO 2JOXFRVLGH
E
*OXFRV\OWUDQVIHUDVHXULGLQHGLSKRVSKRJOXFRVHIUXFWRVH
E
*OXFRV\OWUDQVIHUDVHXULGLQHGLSKRVSKRJOXFRVHIUXFWRVH SKRVSKDWH
E
*OXFRV\OWUDQVIHUDVHXULGLQHGLSKRVSKRJOXFRVHVDOLF\ODWH
D
*OXFXURQLGDVHE
E
*OXWDP\OWUDQVIHUDVHJ
E
*OXWHQLQ
E
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 991
11/13/08 5:48:37 PM
992
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 992
11/13/08 5:48:39 PM
993
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
0DOWDVH
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
0DQQRVLGDVHD
E
0HODQLQ
0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHFDIIHDWH 0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHFDWHFKRO 0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHFDWHFKROWREDFFRFORQH207 LVRHQ]\PH,,UHGXFHG
E E EF
0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHKRPRF\VWHLQH
E
0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHPHWKLRQLQH6
E
0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHSURWHLQDUJLQLQH
E
0HWK\OWUDQVIHUDVHSXWUHVFLQH
E
0XWDVH
E
1XFOHDVH
E
1XFOHDVHGHR[\ULER
E
1XFOHDVHHQGR 1XFOHDVHPDPPDOLDQGHR[\ULERQXFOHDWHQLFNLQJHQGR
E
1XFOHDVHULER
E
1XFOHRVLGDVH
E
1XFOHRWLGDVH
E
1XFOHRWLG\OWUDQVIHUDVHGHR[\ULERQXFOHDWH
E
1XFOHRWLG\OWUDQVIHUDVHGHR[\ULERQXFOHDWH51$GHSHQGHQW
E
1XFOHRWLG\OWUDQVIHUDVHSRO\ULERQXFOHRWLGH
E
1XFOHRWLG\OWUDQVIHUDVHULERQXFOHDWH
E
1XFOHRWLG\OWUDQVIHUDVHULERQXFOHDWH51$GHSHQGHQW
E
2VPRWLQ1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQHS02* UHGXFHG
D
2VPRWLQ1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQHS02* UHGXFHG
D
2VPRWLQ1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQHS72/SUHFXUVRU UHGXFHG
E
2VPRWLQ1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQFORQHS72/UHGXFHG
E
2VPRWLQ1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQUHGXFHG
$
2VPRWLQWREDFFRFORQHS9.SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
D
2VPRWLQWREDFFRFORQHS9.UHGXFHG
D
2[LGDVH
EG
2[LGDVHDVFRUEDWH
EG
2[LGDVHFKROLQH
2[LGDVHFRSURSRUSK\ULQRJHQ
EEG
2[LGDVHF\WRFKURPH
EEG
2[LGDVHGLDPLQH
EDG
2[LGDVHJO\FRODWH
EG
2[LGDVHLQGROHDFHWDWH
EG
2[LGDVHLVRSHQWHQ\ODGHQRVLQH
EG
2[LGDVHPHWK\OSXWUHVFLQH
EG
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 993
11/13/08 5:48:42 PM
994
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 994
11/13/08 5:48:44 PM
995
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
3KRVSKRPXWDVHJOXFRVH
3KRVSKRULERV\OWUDQVIHUDVHQLFRWLQDWH
3KRVSKRU\ODVH
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
E
3KRVSKRU\ODVHD
E
3KRVSKRU\ODVHJXDQRVLQH
E
3KRVSKRU\ODVHSRO\QXFOHRWLGH
3K\WRDOH[LQV
3K\WXEHULQ
3RO\JDODFWXURQDVH 3RO\JDODFWXURQDVHWREDFFRFORQH**JHQH1SJ SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
D >VPRNHUHIHUHQFHV@ ED D
3RO\PHUDVHQXFOHLFDFLGGHR[\ULER
3RO\SKHQROR[LGDVH
D
3RO\8 SRO\PHUDVH
3RO\XELTXLWLQ1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPFORQH8EL8JHQH8EL8 3RUSKRELOLQRJHQDVH
D E
3URWHDVH
D
3URWHDVHVHULQH
3URWHDVHVXOIK\GU\O
3URWHLQ$UDELGRSVLVWKDOLDQDFORQH*JHQH$ NLORGDOWRQUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQWREDFFRNLORGDOWRQ51$ELQGLQJSUHFXUVRU UHGXFHG
E
3URWHLQWREDFFRNLORGDOWRQ51$ELQGLQJ
E
3URWHLQWREDFFRFKORURSODVWFORQHS7%JHQHSVE.
E
3URWHLQWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD&JHQH5%UHGXFHG
G
3URWHLQWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD$JHQH5%UHGXFHG
F
3URWHLQWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD7)/2JHQH1)/
D
3URWHLQWREDFFRFORQHS0*H[WHQVLQOLNHSUHFXUVRU UHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQWREDFFRFORQH353JJHQH353SLVWLOVSHFLILF SUROLQHULFKSUHFXUVRU
D
3URWHLQWREDFFRFORQHS7*)JHQH1)/
D
3URWHLQWREDFFRIORZHUDVVRFLDWHGUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQWREDFFRJHQH067K\GURJHQLRQPRQRVDFFKDULGH FRWUDQVSRUWLQJUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQWREDFFROHDIFXUOYLUXVFRDW
D
3URWHLQ&3%WREDFFRFORQHFSEDQWLIXQJDOUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQ&3%WREDFFRFORQHFSEDQWLIXQJDOUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQ&3%SUHSURWREDFFRFORQHFSEDQWLIXQJDO UHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQ&3%SURWREDFFRFORQHFSEDQWLIXQJDO UHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQ&3%SURWREDFFRFORQHFSEDQWLIXQJDO UHGXFHG
D
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 995
11/13/08 5:48:46 PM
996
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
3URWHLQ'1LFRWLDQDV\OYHVWULVFORQH\D'&\D'&JHQH SVD'DSUHFXUVRU
7REDFFR
D
3URWHLQ'1LFRWLDQDV\OYHVWULVFORQH\D'&\D'&JHQH SVD'D
D
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQD SOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,)$LVRIRUPUHGXFHG
E
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQD SOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,)$LVRIRUPUHGXFHG
E
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP FORQH1H,)$
F
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQD SOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,)$LVRIRUP&WHUPLQDOIUDJPHQW UHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQD SOXPEDJLQLIROLDFORQH1H,)$LVRIRUPUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQIRUPDWLRQLQLWLDWLRQIDFWRUH,)$1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP VDPVXQFORQH1H,)$LVRIRUPUHGXFHG
E
3URWHLQ/WREDFFRFORQH76&ULERVRPHUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQ/WREDFFRFKORURSODVWFORQH/ULERVRPH SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
E
3URWHLQ/WREDFFRFKORURSODVWFORQH/ULERVRPH UHGXFHG
E
3URWHLQ/73WREDFFR
D
3URWHLQ2((WREDFFRVWUDLQ1.SUHFXUVRUUHGXFHG
D
3URWHLQDVH 3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRU
D ED
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRU3,
ID
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRUSUHSUR7,03D1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP VDPVXQUHGXFHG
ED
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRUSUHSUR7,03E1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXP VDPVXQUHGXFHG
ED
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRUSUR7,03D1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQ UHGXFHG
ED
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRUSUR7,03E1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQ UHGXFHG
ED
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRU7,03D1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQ UHGXFHG
ED
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 996
5HIHUHQFHV
11/13/08 5:48:48 PM
997
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
3URWHLQDVHLQKLELWRU7,03E1LFRWLDQDWDEDFXPVDPVXQ UHGXFHG
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
ED
3\URSKRVSKDWDVH
E
3\URSKRVSKDWDVHLQRUJDQLF
E
3\URSKRVSKDWDVHQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH
E
3\URSKRVSKDWDVHQXFOHRWLGH
ED
3\URSKRVSKDWDVHWKLDPLQ
E
3\URSKRVSKRU\ODVH
E
3\URSKRVSKRU\ODVHQLFRWLQDWHPRQRQXFOHRWLGHFDUER[\ODWLQJ
E
5HGXFWDVH
EF
5HGXFWDVHDOGRVH
EFD
5HGXFWDVHF\WRFKURPHFUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQH GLQXFOHRWLGHSKRVSKDWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHIHUUHGR[LQQLWULWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHJOXWDWKLRQH
EF
5HGXFWDVHJO\R[\ODWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHK\GUR[\ODPLQH
EF
5HGXFWDVHK\GUR[\PHWK\OJOXWDU\OFRHQ]\PH$UHGXFHG QLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGHSKRVSKDWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHQLWUDWH
EDF
5HGXFWDVHQLWUDWHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQH GLQXFOHRWLGHSKRVSKDWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHQLWULWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHQLWULWHUHGXFHGQLFRWLQDPLGHDGHQLQHGLQXFOHRWLGH SKRVSKDWH
EF
5HGXFWDVHS\UUROLQHFDUER[\ODWH
EF
5HWLQH
5LERQXFOHDVH
5LERQXFOHLFDFLG
5LERQXFOHLFDFLG%RPE\[PRULILEURLQVSHFLI\LQJPHVVHQJHU
ED
5LERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD$JHQH5% SURWHLQVSHFLI\LQJQXFOHRWLGHPHVVHQJHU
FD
5LERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD$JHQH5% SURWHLQVSHFLI\LQJQXFOHRWLGHPHVVHQJHU
FD
5LERQXFOHLFDFLGWREDFFRFORQHODPEGD&+1FKLWLQDVH EDVLFLVRHQ]\PHVSHFLI\LQJPHVVHQJHU
D
5LERQXFOHLFDFLGVWUDQVIHUDVH
E
E$
5LEXORVHELVSKRVSKDWHFDUER[\ODVH ^5XELVFR)UDFWLRQSURWHLQ)SURWHLQ`
6\QWKDVHDPLQRF\FORSURSDQHFDUER[\ODWH
D
6\QWKDVHGHK\GURTXLQDWH
DD
6\QWKDVHHQROS\UXYR\OVKLNLPDWHSKRVSKDWH 6\QWKDVHHQROS\UXYR\OVKLNLPDWHSKRVSKDWHSHWXQLD FORQHS021S021UHGXFHG /DODQLQH
D DD
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 997
11/13/08 5:48:50 PM
998
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 998
11/13/08 5:48:52 PM
999
Genes, Nucleotides, and Enzymes
Table XXII-2 (Continued) Enzymes, Genes, Clones in Tobacco
&$61R
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
;\ODQDVHHQGRE
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
E
E;\ORVLGDVH
E
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C022.indd 999
11/13/08 5:48:54 PM
23
“Hoffmann Analytes”
In essence, the terminology “Hoffmann analyte” or “Hoffmann-type analyte” or “Hoffmann list compound” had its beginning over two decades ago in 1985. Early that year, a Working Group of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) met to evaluate the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans, with particular emphasis on tobacco smoking. The next year, the Working Group’s assessment of tobacco smoking was published in an IARC monograph (1870). Among the twenty-eight members of the Working Group were Ernst L. Wynder and Dietrich Hoffmann from the American Health Foundation, whose participation in the discussions on the components of tobacco and particularly tobacco smoke was obviously quite extensive. The number of references cited in the various smoke component figures, tables, and appendixes in the IARC monograph (1870) reveals the extent of the Wynder-Hoffmann contribution to the Working Group study (see summary in Table XXIII-1). Nearly 44% of the citations on smoke components considered deleterious represented a Hoffmann-related publication. In all of the forty-four references listed in Table XXIII-1, Hoffmann was a co-author. A few months after the IARC 1985 Working Group meeting, Hoffmann and Wynder presented a paper on biologically active tobacco smoke components at a conference and its contents were published in 1986 (1808). Deriving their assessment of various tobacco smoke components from the conclusions of the IARC 1985 Working Group, Hoffmann and Wynder listed forty biologically active components in cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) and sidestream smoke (SSS). Over the next decade and half, a series of articles were published with Hoffmann as a co-author of each and in each article was a listing of tobacco and/or smoke components that were classified as biologically active (1808, 1741), carcinogenic (1808, 1740, 1743, 1744), cocarcinogenic (1808), or tumorigenic (1717, 1773). Table XXIII-2 summarizes the chronology of the articles and the varied classifications of the activity of the components listed. In those publications in which the classification “biologically active” was used, no mention was made of the fact that many biologically active components in tobacco smoke, for example, α-tocopherol and α- and β-4,8,13duvane-1,3-diol, have been demonstrated to exert anticarcinogenic or inhibitory effects on the activity of several tobacco smoke components considered potent tumorigens or mutagens [see Table 3 in (3255a), Table 6 in (3265), Table 11 in (3300)]. In contrast to the multiple listings of benz[a]anthracene (B[a] A) as a biologically active MSS component (1741, 1808) or as a tumorigen (1727, 1773) or as a carcinogen (1740, 1743, 1744), Hoffmann and Wynder (1786) reported in 1959 that, in their mouse skin-painting study, B[a]A co-administered
with benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) reduced the tumorigenicity of the B[a]P, that is, B[a]A was anticarcinogenic to B[a]P. Eventually the number of biologically active smoke components, primarily the tumorigens, was expanded from the forty-three listed in 1990 by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) to eighty-two listed in 1998 by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740). Much of the increase was due to the inclusion of the N-heterocyclic amines and several vapor-phase components. Because of the change in its assessment concerning their tumorigenicity, chrysene and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were no longer considered as tumorigens by the IARC. Several other similar lists, not co-authored by Hoffmann, were issued after 1986. They included the 1994 list by the U.S. Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) (2825) and the 2001 list by Fowles and Bates (1217). Neither of these lists differed significantly from those issued by Hoffmann and his colleagues between 1986 and 2001. Table XXIII-3 is a tabulation of the toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke from the IARC 1986 publication (1870) plus the seven lengthy publications co-authored from 1986 to 2001 by Hoffmann with his American Health Foundation colleagues. Examination of the various lists reveals several anomalies, none of which detracts from the meaningfulness of the publications. The anomalies include:
1. Several instances where the per cigarette yield range unit was listed as microgram in one article and nanogram in another, for example, the per cigarette yield range for quinoline listed as 1 to 2 ng in (1743) and 1 to 2 μg in (1744). 2. Several instances where the per cigarette yield range differs significantly in two different publications, for example, the per cigarette yield range for N-nitrosopyrrolidine is listed as 1.5 to 110 ng in (1727) and 3 to 60 ng in (1740). 3. Several instances where the per cigarette yield range differs in different tables in the same article, for example, the per cigarette yield range for catechol is listed as 25 to 360 µg in Table 5 in (1808), as 100 to 350 µg in Table 11 in (1808), and 140 to 500 µg in Table 13 in (1808). 4. The per cigarette yield range is listed for the wrong component, for example, the range 1.7 to 3.2 ng is listed for dibenzo[a,l]pyrene in (1741, 1743, 1744) but in each case that range should be listed for the omitted dibenzo[a,i]pyrene [see (1727, 1740, 1773)]. 5. In some instances, particularly with several PAHs, the per cigarette yield ranges include data generated from cigarettes manufactured in the 1950s 1001
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1001
11/24/08 12:37:11 PM
1002
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-1 Hoffmann Contributions on Smoke Components to the 1985 IARC Working Group on Tobacco Smoking
Item
No, of Hoffmann et al. References Cited
Hoffmann et al. References
Figure 5 Table 20
Some chemical constituents of tobacco smoke Concentrations of some PAHs and heterocyclic compounds in tobacco smoke
1 33
1 13
Table 21 Table 22 Table 23 Table 24
Concentrations of some phenols in tobacco smoke Concentrations of free fatty acids in cigarette smoke Concentrations of aromatic amines in cigarette smoke Concentrations of major pyridines and pyrazines in mainstream cigarette smoke Concentrations of N-nitrosamines in cigarette smoke Concentrations of N-nitrosamines in SSS of commercial cigarettes and cigars Physiochemical comparison of MSS and SSS of cigarettes Concentrations of selected compounds in nonfilter cigarette MSS and the ratio of their relative distribution in SSS Chemical compounds identified in tobacco smoke that have been evaluated for carcinogenicity in the IARC monograph series
11 1 1 2
3 1 1 1
3491 1560, 1699, 1763, 1765, 1766, 1779, 1780, 1800, 1803, 3088, 4308, 4312, 4317 497, 1703, 4332 1785 2900 512
1 2
1 2
1696 1685, 1696
2 6
2 1
1695, 1696 1720
6a
3
4332, 4348, 4348a
Table 25 Table 26 Table 30 Table 31 Appendix 2
a
Topic
No. of Specific References Cited
Three of the cited references were to IARC monographs.
1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1870) but an incorrect single value of 40 ng is listed in (1808); all DB[a,h] A listings in the references cited fail to take into account the reporting of a DB[a,h]A yield of 5 ng/cigarette by Van Duuren in 1958 (4020). The MSS yield of 4 ng/
and 1960s with “tar” and nicotine yields far in excess of more recently manufactured cigarettes. 6. The per cigarette yield range is incomplete, for example, a single value of 4 ng/cigarette is listed for dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) in (1727, 1740,
Table XXIII-2 Hoffmann-Related Lists of Toxicants in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Year
Authors
Ref. No.
1986
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Hoffmann and Wynder
1870
19
1808
5
1808
6
1808
13
1986
Table No.
1990
Hoffmann and Hecht
1727
3
1993
Hoffmann et al.
1773
1
1997 1998
Hoffmann and Hoffmann Hoffmann and Hoffmann
1740 1741
3 1
2001 2001
Hoffmann and Hoffmann Hoffmann et al.
1743 1744
5-4 4
Table Title Concentrations of biologically-active agents in nonfilter cigarette mainstream smoke Carcinogens and cocarcinogens in the smoke of a nonfilter cigarette Organ-specific carcinogens in cigarette smoke Biologically-active agents in mainstream smoke (of nonfilter cigarettes) Tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke Tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke Carcinogens in tobacco and cigarette smoke Biologically-active agents in the mainstream smoke of nonfilter cigarettes Carcinogens in cigarette smoke Carcinogens in cigarette smoke
No. of Component Listed 60 21 14 40 43 41 60 82 68 68
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1002
11/24/08 12:37:11 PM
1986
1986
1990
1993
1997
1998
2001
2001
IARC (1870) a
Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
Hoffmann et al. (1773)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743)
Hoffmann et al. (1744)
20-70 ng 40-70 ng b 4-76 ng c
40-70 ng g 40-60 ng j
20-70 ng
20-70 ng
20-70 ng
20-70 ng
20-70 ng
20-70 ng
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
4-22 ng 30 ng b
30 ng g
4-22 ng
4-22 ng
4-22 ng
4-22 ng
4-22 ng
4-22 ng
Benzo[j]fluoranthene
6-21 ng 60 ng b
60 ng g
6-21 ng
6-21 ng
6-21 ng
6-21 ng
6-21 ng
6-21 ng
Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene
6-12 ng 20-40 ng 10-50 ng b 5-78 ng c
NL e
6-12 ng
6-12 ng
6-12 ng
6-12 ng
6-12 ng
6-12 ng
10-50 ng g 10-40 ng i
20-40 ng
20-40 ng
20-40 ng
20-40 ng
20-40 ng
20-40 ng
Component
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benz[a]anthracene
Chrysene Chrysene, 5-methylDibenz[a,h]anthracene Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene
40-60 ng b 0.6 ng 4 ng Pd, NYLe Pd, NYLe 1.7-3.2 ng 2-3 ng b 17-32 ng c
40-60 ng g 0.6 ng 40 ng NLe NLe NL
40-60 ng 0.6 ng 4 ng NL NL 1.7-3.2 ng
40-60 ng 0.6 ng 4 ng NL NL 1.7-3.2 ng
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng NL NL 1.7-3.2 ng
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng P, NYLf NL NLf
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng P, NYLf NL NLf
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng P, NYLf NL NLf
Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene g Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
P, NYL 4-20 ng
P, NYL 4 ng
P, NYL 4-20 ng
P, NYL 4-20 ng
P, NYL 4-20 ng
1.7-3.2 ng f 4-20 ng
1.7-3.2 ng f 4-20 ng
1.7-3.2 ng f 4-20 ng
Pyridine
16-40 µg
NL
NL
NL
20-200 µg m
10-40 µg
20-200 µg s
Quinoline Dibenz[a,h]acridine h Dibenz[a,j]acridine
NL e 0.1 ng 2.7 ng 3-10 ng b 0.7 ng
NL 0.1 ng g 3-10 ng g
1-2 µg 0.1 ng 3-10 ng
0.2-1.3 µmg 0.1 ng 3-10 ng
1-2 µg 0.1 ng 3-10 ng
2-180 ng 0.1 ng 3-10 ng
20-200 µg p 16-40 µg r 1-2 ng x 0.1 ng 3-10 ng
0.7 ng g
0.7 ng
0.7 ng
0.7 ng
0.9 ng
0.7 ng
0.7 ng
2-20 ng 1-200 ng b 0-2.7 ng 0.1-10 ng b
1-180 ng h 2-180 ng j 1-40 ng h 0,1-40 ng j
0.1-180 ng
0.1-180 ng
0.1-180 ng
2-180 ng
2-180 ng
2-1000 ng
3-13 ng
3-13 ng
3-13 ng
3-13 ng
3-13 ng
3-13 ng
“Hoffmann Analytes”
78836_C023.indd 1003
Table XXIII-3 The Basis for the “Hoffmann Analytes”: The Lists of Toxicants Issued by HOFFMANN et al. from 1986 to 2001
Aza-arenes
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole
1-2 µg 0.1 ng 3-10 ng
N-Nitrosamines N-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitrosoethylmethylamine
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
1003
11/24/08 12:37:12 PM
(Continued)
1004
78836_C023.indd 1004
Table XXIII-3 (continued) The Basis for the “Hoffmann Analytes”: The Lists of Toxicants Issued by HOFFMANN et al. from 1986 to 2001 1986
1990
1993
1997
1998
2001
2001
Component
IARC (1870)a
Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
Hoffmann et al. (1773)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743)
Hoffmann et al. (1744)
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
0-2.8 ng 0-10 ng b 0-1 ng 0-3 ng 0-110 ng 2-42 ng b 0-9 ng 0-36 ng 0-90 ng b NL 0.2-3.0 µg 0.13-0.25 µg b 0.08-0.77 µg 0.08-0.7 µg b
0.1-28 ng
0-25 ng
0-25 ng
0-2.8 ng
0-2.8 ng
0-2.8 ng
0-2.8 ng
0-1 ng 0-3 ng 2-110 ng h 2-42 ng j 0-9 ng 0-40 ng
NL NL 1.5-110 ng
NL NL NL
NL NL 3-60 ng
0-1.0 ng 0-30 ng 3-110 ng
0-1.0 ng 0-30 ng 3-110 ng
0-1.0 ng 0-30 ng 3-110 ng
NL 0-36 ng
NL NL
NL 0-68 ng
0-9 ng 0-68 ng
0-9 ng 0-68 ng
0-9 ng 0-68 ng
NL 0.12-3.7 µg
NL 0.12-3.7 µg
NL 0.12-3.7 µg
NYL 0.12-3.7 µg
ND e 120-3.700 ng v
NL 0.12-3.7 µg v
NL 0.12-3.7 µg v
0.12-0.95 µg
0.08-0.77 µg
0.08-0.77 µg
0.08-0.77 µg
0.08-0.77 µg
0.08-0.77 µg
0.08-0.77 µg
0-150 ng 0-200 ng b NL 0-3.7 µg b NL
40-400 ng h 120 ng j NL
0.14-4.6 µg
0.14-4.6 µg
0.14-4.6 µg
0-150 ng
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
ND k in MSS
ND in MSS
ND in MSS
ND in MSS
NL
NL
NL 32-160 ng 30-200 ng b NL NL 3-4 ng b 1.7-22 ng 1-22 ng b NL 2.4-4.6 ng 2-5 ng b
360 ng 30-160 ng
360 ng 30-200 ng
NL 30-200 ng
NL 30-200 ng
360-655 ng 30-337 ng
360-655 ng r 30-337 ng
NL 30-337 ng
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
4-50 µg x NL
4-50 ng x NL
4.3-27 ng
1-22 ng
1-22 ng
1-22 ng
1-334 ng
1-334 ng
1-334 ng
NL 2.4-4.6 ng
NL 2-5 ng
NL 2-5 ng
NL 2-5 ng
NL 2-5.6 ng
NL 2-5.6 ng
NL 2-5.6 ng
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine N-Nitrosopyrrolidine N-Nitrosopiperidine N-Nitrosodiethanolamine N-Nitrososarcosine N’-Nitrosonornicotine 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone N’-Nitrosoanabasine N’-Nitrosoanatabine N-Nitrosomorpholine Aromatic Amines Aniline 2-Toluidine Aniline, 2,6-dimethyl1-Naphthylamine 2-Naphthylamine Biphenyl, 3-aminoBiphenyl, 4-amino-
11/24/08 12:37:12 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1986
NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
25-260 ng 2-37 ng 0.37-0.89 ng 0.25-0.88 ng 11-23 ng 0.26 ng NL 0.29-0.48 ng 0.82-1.1 ng
25-260 ng 2-37 ng 6.37x-0.89 ng 0.25-0.88 ng 11-23 ng 0.3 ng NL 0.3-0.5 ng 0.8-1.1 ng
25-260 ng NL 0.37-0.89 ng 0.25-0.88 ng 11-23 ng 0.3 ng NL 0.3-0.5 ng 0.8-1.1 ng
25-260 ng 2-37 ng 0.37-0.89 ng 0.25-0.88 ng 11-23 ng 0.3 ng NL 0.3-0.5 ng 0.8-1.1 ng
70-100 µg 20-88 µg b 500-1200 µg 18-1400 µg b NL NL 10-20 µg 60-100 µg 25-140 µg b 100-250 µg NL
5-100 µg
70-100 µg
70-100 µg
70-100 µg
500-1200 µg
18-1400 µg
18-1400 µg
NL NL NL 50-100 µg
NL NL 10-20 µg NL
NL NL 10-20 µg NL
70-100 µg l 20-100 µg m 18-1400 µg l 400-1400 µg m NL NL NL 60-140 µg m
NL NL 10-20 µg 60-140 µg
70-100 µg 20-100 µg p 500-1400 µg u 400-1400 µg p NL NL NL 60-140 µg p
70-100 µg l 20-100 µg s 500-1400 µg u 400-1400 µg s NL NL NL 60-240 µg s
100-250 µg NL
NL NL
NL NL
100-650 µg m NL
NL NL
100-650 µg p NL
NL NL
20-75 µg
20-75 µg 25-40 µg p 450-1000 µg u 200-400 µg p 20-70 µg 12-50 µg p 20-60 µg p 10 µg
20-75 µg 25-40 µg s 450-1000 µg u 200-400 µg s 20–70 µg 6-70 µg s 5-90 µg s 10 µg
38-56 µg 3-15 µg P, NYL P, NYL 1.16 µg r 80-180 µg p 100-250 µg r NL
38-56 µg 3-15 µg P, NYL P, NYL
AaC MeAaC Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 PhIP IQ MeIQ Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2
“Hoffmann Analytes”
78836_C023.indd 1005
N-Heterocyclic Aminesk
Aldehydes and Ketones Formaldehyde Acetaldehyde Propionaldehyde Butyraldehyde Crotonaldehyde Acrolein Acetone 2-Butanone
500-1.400 µg u
Volatile Hydrocarbons 1,3-Butadiene
NL
NL
NL
NL
Isoprene
NL
NL
NL
NL
Benzene
20-50 µg
20-50 µg
12-48 µg
12-48 µg
Toluene Styrene
NL 10 µg
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
20-75 µg l 25-40 µg m 450-1000 µg l 200-400 µg m 12–70 µg l 6-70 µg m 5-90 µg m 10 µg
38-56 µg b 3.2-15 µg b NL P, NYL NL NL
NL 3.2-15 µg NL NL NL NL
NL 3.2-15 µg NL P, NYL NL NL
NL 3.2-15 µg NL P, NYL NL NL
NL 3.2-15 µg P, NYL NYL NL 80-180 µg m
38-56 µg 3-15 µg P, NYL P, NYL 1.16 µg 100-250 µg
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
1.5-5 µg
450-1.00 µg u 20–70 µg NL 10 µg
Miscellaneous Organic Compounds Acetamide Acrylonitrile Acrylamide Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethylMaleic hydrazide Methanol Methyl isocyanate
80-180 µg s NL (Continued)
1005
11/24/08 12:37:12 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
1006
78836_C023.indd 1006
Table XXIII-3 (continued) The Basis for the “Hoffmann Analytes”: The Lists of Toxicants Issued by HOFFMANN et al. from 1986 to 2001 1986
1986
1990
1993
1997
1998
2001
2001
Component
IARC (1870) a
Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
Hoffmann et al. (1773)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743)
Hoffmann et al. (1744)
Nitromethane 2-Nitropropane
NL 0.2-2.2 µg 0.73-1.21 µg b NL 1.3-16 ng 1-16 ng b 20-38 ng NL NL NL NL
NL 0.2-2.2 µg
NL 0.73-1.21 µg
NL 0.73-1.21 µg
NL 0.73-1.21 µg
NL 0.2-2.2 µg
0.3-0.6 µg 0.7-1.2 µg
0.5-0.6 µg 0.7-1.2 µg
NL 1.3-16 ng
NL 1-16 ng
NL 1-16 ng
NL 1-16 ng
25 µg 11-15 ng
25 µg 11-15 ng
25 µg 11-15 ng
20-38 ng NL NL NL NL
20-38 ng NL NL NL NL
20-38 ng NL NL NL NL
20-38 ng 7 µg NL 20 µg 18-30 ng u
20-38 µg 7 µg 12-100 ng NL 18-37 ng u
20-38 µg 7 µg 0-100 ng NL 18-37 µg u
NL
NL
NL
NL
20-38 ng 7 µg NL 20 µg 18-30 µg l 20-40 µg m P, NYL
P, NYL
P, NYL
P, NYL
Phenol o-Cresol m-Cresol p-Cresol Catechol
60-140 µg 14-30 µg NL NL 40-350 µg
80-60 NL NL NL 200-400 µg
NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL
80-160 µg NL NL NL 200-400 µg
80-160 µg r NL NL NL 100-360 µg 200-400 µg r
60-180 µg t NL NL NL 90-2000 µg 100-200 µg t
Resorcinol Hydroquinone Methyleugenol Caffeic acid
8-80 µg b 88-155 µg b NL NL
60-140 µg NL NL NL 25-360 µg g 100-350 µgi 140-500 µg j NL 110-300 µg NL NL
NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL
NL NL 20 ng NL
NL NL 20 ng < 3 µg
NL NL 20 ng < 3 µg
NL 0.7-1.2 µg b NL NL
NL
NL
NL
800-1200 ng
800-1.200 ng u
800-1200 µg
800-1200 µg
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
200-370 ng NL
200-370 ng NL
200-370 µg NL
200-370 µg NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
24-43 ng NL 1-25 µg
24-43 ng NL NL
24-43 ng NL 40-120 ng
24-43 ng NL 40-120 ng
24-43 ng 20-90 µg m 40-120 ng
24-34 µg x 10-90 µg 40-120 ng
24-43 ng 20-90 µg p 40-120 µg
24-43 ng 20-90 µg s 40-120 µg
Nitrobenzene Vinyl chloride Ethyl carbamate Ethylene oxide Propylene oxide Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Furan Benzo[b]furan Phenols
DDT DDE Polychlorodibenzop-dioxins Polychlorodibenzofurans Inorganic Components
11/24/08 12:37:13 PM
Hydrazine Hydrogen sulfide Arsenic
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Chloroaromatic Compounds
NL 9-70 ng 4-70 ng 0.2 ng 0-600 ng b NL Pc 0.03 pCi Pc
NL NL NL NL 20-3000 ng NL NL 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
NL 41-62 ng 4-70 ng NL 0-600 ng NL 35-85 ng 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
NL 41-62 ng 4-70 ng NL 0-600 ng NL 35-85 ng 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
NL 41-62 ng 4-70 ng NL 0-600 ng NL 35-85 ng 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
0.3 µg NL 4-70 ng 0.13-0.2 ng 0-600 ng 4 ng 34-85 ng 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
0.5 ng 7-350 ng 4-70 ng 0.13-0.2 ng 0-600 ng NL 34-85 ng 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
0.5 ng 7-350 ng 4-70 ng 0.13-0.2 ng 0-600 ng 34-85 ng 0.03-1.0 pCi NL
Nicotine Carbon monoxide Ammonia
1.0-2.3 mg 10-23 mg 50-130 µg
1.0-3.0 mg NL NL
NL NL NL
0.1-3.0 mg n 14-23 mg m 10-130 µg m
1.0-3.0 mg 10-23 mg 10-130 µg
1.0-3.0 mg q 14-23 mg p 10-130 µg p
0.1-3.0 mg t 14-23 mg s 10-130 µg s
Nitrogen oxides Hydrogen cyanide
100-600 µg 400-500 µg
1-2.5 mg 10-23 mg 50-170 µg i 50-130 µg j 50-600 µg 400-500 µg
NL NL
NL NL
100-600 µg m 400-500 µg m
100-600 µg 400-500 µg
100-600 µg p 400-500 µg p
100-600 µg s 400-500 µg s
“Hoffmann Analytes”
78836_C023.indd 1007
Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (VI) Cobalt Nickel Mercury Lead Polonium-210 Selenium Additional Components
See Table 19 in (1870). See Appendix 2 in (1870). c See Table 20 in (1870) d P = present, as listed in Appendix 2 in (1870). e NL= not listed; NYL = no per cigarette MSS yield listed; ND = not detected. f The yield range listed for dibenz[a,l]pyrene is incorrect. It is the range usually listed for dibenzo[a,i]pyrene. The P, NYL designation should also apply to dibenzo[a,l]pyrene. g See Table 5 in (1808). h See Table 6 in (1808). i See Table 11 in (1808). j See Table 13 in (1808). k AaC = 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; MeAaC = 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; Glu-P-1 = 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole; Glu-P-2 = 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole; PhIP = 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine; IQ = 2-amino-3-methyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; MeIQ = 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; Trp-P-1 = 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole; Trp-P-2 = 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole l See Table 3 in (1740). m See Table 1 in (1740). n See Table 2 in (1740). p See Table 5-1 in (1743). q See Table 5-2 in (1743). r See Table 5-3 in (1743). s See Table 2 in (1744). t See Table 3 in (1744). u Compare yield listed in Table 1 in (1741), Table 5-4 in (1743), and Table 4 in (1744). v Compare yield listed in Table 1 in (1741) with those listed in (1727, 1740, 1743, 1744).
a
b
1007
11/24/08 12:37:13 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
1008
cigarette of DB[a,h]A was obtained by Hoffmann and Wynder in the late 1950s (1787, 1788) from a 1959 cigarette and reported as such in 1963 by Wynder and Hoffmann [see Table 1 in (4317)]. 7. A component with no known per cigarette yield is treated the same as a component with literally hundreds of per cigarette yield values, for example, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene vs. B[a]P. 8. For the identification of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene in MSS, IARC [see Footnote 33 in Table 20 in (1870)] cited the footnote in the 1958 publication by Van Duuren (4020). However, like many other investigators [Lyons and Johnston (2430), Rodgman and Cook (3273), Wynder and Wright (4354), Wynder et al. (4355)], Van Duuren had reported the identification of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene in MSS. However, in 1966 Lavit-Lamy and Buu-Hoï (2314) reported that the compound previously thought to be dibenzo[a,l]pyrene was actually its isomer dibenz[a,e]aceanthrylene (dibenz[a,e] fluoranthene) [see also Lacassagne et al. (2250)]. In 1983, IARC had commented that all pre-1966 studies involved with dibenzo[a,l]pyrene were actually dealing with dibenz[a,e]fluoranthene not dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (1868a). Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene was eventually identified in MSS by Snook et al. (3756) but no quantitative data were given. 9. The repetitious inclusion in the lists published by Hoffmann and colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808) of the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h] acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole reported by Van Duuren et al. despite the failure of numerous investigators in several countries between 1970 and 2000 to confirm their presence in MSS [(3260), also see Table 12-7 in Baker (172) and Table 4 in Rodgman (3265).
These and other anomalies were described in detail by Rodgman (3265). The many publications co-authored by Hoffmann (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808), each of which contained a list of biologically active components identified in tobacco smoke, led to two interesting episodes as a result of his efforts. Because of those numerous co-authored publications and the listing of toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke, Dr. Dietrich Hoffmann was dubbed “The Author of the List” in 2002 (23A05). This recognition was subsequently extrapolated in numerous scientific conference presentations and journal publications in which Dr. Hoffmann’s list contributions were acknowledged by the authors in the title of many scientific conference presentations and journal publications by inclusion of the term “Hoffmann analytes” or “Hoffmann-type analytes” or Hoffmann list compounds.” In some published articles, the term “Hoffmann analytes” does not appear in the title but does appear in the headings of tables in the articles, for example, in several publications by Baker and his colleagues at British American Tobacco
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
(BAT), the term “Hoffmann analytes” appears in the title of several tables (174a, 174c). Table XXIII-4 catalogs some of the presentations and/or publications in which the term “Hoffmann analyte” or its equivalent was used in tobaccorelated scientific literature from the year 2000 to 2006. Table XXIII-5 catalogs the components in the various lists co-authored by Hoffmann. In an attempt at simplification, the sequence of components in Table XXIII-5 approximates the sequence in many of the articles. Also in Table XXIII-5, the various components listed by Hoffmann and colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808) are listed in the most recently accepted nomenclature, for example, benzo[b]fluoranthene is listed as benz[e]acephenanthrylene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene is listed as dibenzo[def,p]chrysene, catechol is listed as 1,2-benzenediol. In each case, the nomenclature used in the Hoffmann articles accompanies the most recent nomenclature listing. Also included in Table XXIII-5 are several components that do not appear in any of the Hoffmann co-authored lists but recently have been included with analyses of Hoffmannlisted components, for example, 1-naphthalenamine (1-aminonaphthalene; α-naphthylamine), 3-aminobiphenyl ([1,1’-biphenyl]-3-amine), propionaldehyde (propanal), butyraldehyde (butanal), and acetone (2-propanone). Table XXIII-5 includes several tobacco smoke components that the IARC has reclassified with regard to their tumorigenicity, for example, chrysene and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. Thus, chrysene no longer appears on the more recent Hoffmann lists (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744) and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was omitted from (1743, 1744). One point of interest in the Table XXIII-5 catalog is the tremendous number of references that deal with some aspect of the various Hoffmann-listed components. Over the years, numerous reports have been issued in which analytical data were presented on the per cigarette yields of numerous components in the MSS of the 1R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarette. Many of the analytes were defined as “Hoffmann analytes.” Table XXIII-6 summarizes several such analyses on the 1R4F MSS reported by Baker et al. [see Table 11 in (174b)], Rustemeir et al. (3370), and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) (3190)]. Also included in Table XXIII-6 are the “Hoffmann analyte” yields reported by Chen and Moldoveanu (688) for the MSS of the 2R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarette. Similar examples of “Hoffmann analyte” data are available in Baker et al. [see Table 12 in (174b)] and Rodgman and Green (3300). Table XXIII-6 lists the MSS analytes proposed by the Department of Health (Canada) (23A06). Assessment of all the lists in Table XXIII-6 reveals that the number of analytes in each case is in the mid-40s and most of them may be considered, based on the various listings by Hoffmann and his colleagues, as “Hoffmann analytes.” The sequence of components in Table XXIII-6 parallels the component class sequence usually used in the tables in the various articles by Hoffmann and colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808). Table XXVIII-6 also indicates the many components in the Hoffmann lists that are not usually analyzed or included in the “Hoffmann analyte” list of forty-four or forty-five biologically active components.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1008
11/24/08 12:37:13 PM
1009
“Hoffmann Analytes”
Table XXIII-4 An Abbreviated Chronology of the Use of the Term “Hoffmann Analyte” or Its Equivalent in Tobacco Smoke-Related Scientific Literature Year
Author(s) and Title of Article
2000
While it did not use the term “Hoffmann analyte” in its report, the Department of Health (Canada) proposed that analytical data on the following smoke components from tobacco smoke should be a requirement (23A06): “tar”, nicotine, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, butyraldehyde, acrolein, crotonaldehyde, acetone, benzo[a]pyrene, NNN, NNK, NAB, NAT, 1-aminonaphthalene, 2-aminonaphthalene, 3-aminobiphenyl, 4-aminobiphenyl, pyridine, quinoline, styrene, catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone, phenol, o-cresol, m-cresol, p-cresol, eugenol, 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, benzene, toluene, acrylonitrile, NH3, CO, HCN, NO, NOx, As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Ni, Se. Examination of the Department of Health (Canada) list reveals that most of its listed components appear in the biologically-active component lists in the publications co-authored by Hoffmann (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808).
2001
In a memorandum to the Department of Health (Canada), Levine (23A10) described the results of an inter-laboratory comparison on “Hoffmann analytes” in the MSSs from three different cigarette brands.
2001
At the 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference (TSRC), Purkis et al. (3007) in their description of the reliability of measurements of smoke analytes discussed the measurement of 44 “Hoffmann analytes.” Their TSRC presentation was published in 2003.
2002
At the 56th TSRC, Baker and Willoughby (later Bishop) (172a) described the compounds generated by the pyrolysis of relatively volatile tobacco ingredients. Subsequently, the presentation was published in 2004 and linked to the “Hoffmann analyte” concept.
2002
At the 56th TSRC, Cashmore (631) presented a paper entitled: Alternative smoking regimes: Hoffmann analyte formation and prediction as a consequence of changing smoking regimes and filter vent blocking.
2003
At the 57th TSRC, Chang et al. (23A04) presented a paper entitled: Influence of tip ventilation on Hoffmann analyte deliveries.
2003
In their study of a new Kentucky Reference Cigarette 2R4F, Chen and Moldoveanu (688) described the quantitation of more than 44 analytes in smoke, including most compounds considered as biologically active and described elsewhere as “Hoffmann analytes.” They referred to the biologically-active components listed in 1998 by Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741).
2003
At the 57th TSRC, Dimandia et al. (23A07) described the analysis of Hoffmann list compounds by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry
2003
Also at the 57th TSRC, Ellisor et al. (23A08) described the variation in the level of Hoffmann analytes for cigarette MSS when a large volume of air passes through the collection device and Volgger et al. (23A14) described the influence of different cigarette paper properties on the formation of Hoffmann type analytes in smoke.
2003
Warren presented two papers at the 57th TSRC; both of which dealt with “Hoffmann analytes.” They were entitled: The Hoffmann analyte to ‘tar’ ratio paradox (4136) and Prediction of mainstream cigarette smoke Hoffmann analyte yields by statistical modeling (4137).
2004
Baker and Bishop (172a) in their report on the pyrolysis of tobacco ingredients noted the following: Of the approximately 4800 substances in tobacco smoke (1373), 44 are believed…to be relevant to tobacco-related diseases (23A06). These include…some volatile carbonyl compounds, tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines, aromatic amines, phenols, volatile alkenes, benzo[a]pyrene and metals. These substances are sometimes called colloquially ‘Hoffmann analytes’ since similar lists of toxicological substances have been proposed by Dietrich Hoffmann et al. of the American Health Foundation in New York since the mid 1980s. The latest compilation by Hoffmann et al. lists 82 substances (1741, 1743, 1744). From their experimental findings, BAKER and BISHOP concluded: Particular attention has been paid to assessing the generation of ‘Hoffmann analytes’, i.e., biologically-active analytes in smoke, from the pyrolysis of the ingredients. In general, the number of ‘Hoffmann analytes’ detected among the pyrolytic products of the ingredients, and their levels, are low. (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1009
11/24/08 12:37:13 PM
1010
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-4 (continued) An Abbreviated Chronology of the use of the Term “Hoffmann Analyte” or Its Equivalent in Tobacco Smoke-Related Scientific Literature Year
Author(s) and Title of Article
2004
In a series of three papers on the effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry, Baker et al. (174a, 174b, 174c) did not include the term “Hoffmann analyte” or its equivalent in the three titles. However, the term “Hoffmann analyte” was used throughout each of the publications. E.g., in the abstract of Baker et al. (174a), it is stated: The studies are: pyrolysis of the ingredients; influence of the ingredients on smoke constituents believed by regulatory authorities to be relevant to smoking-related diseases (“Hoffmann analytes”)… The term “Hoffmann analytes” also appeared in the title of Table 3 in (174a). In the abstract of Baker et al. (174b), the following was stated: The effects of 450 tobacco ingredients added to tobacco on the forty-four “Hoffmann analytes” in mainstream cigarette smoke have been determined…They are based on lists published by D. Hoffmann and co-workers of the American Health Foundation… In their summary of the effect of casing ingredients on smoke composition, Baker et al. (174c) stated: The effects of 29 casing flavour ingredients and three humectants on the yields of 44 “Hoffmann analytes” in cigarette smoke have been assessed. The term “Hoffmann analytes” also appeared in the title of Table 10 in (174c).
2004
Case and Warren (23A03) were issued a European patent on a multivariate regression system for predicting “Hoffmann analytes” in tobacco smoke. While the term “Hoffmann analyte” did not appear in the title of the patent, in its text the term was used as follows: The concentration of yields of a first set of components in a particular tobacco smoke, such as the Hoffmann analytes, are predicted on the basis of a statistical model.
2004
Imperial Tobacco Co. (23A09) discussed “Hoffmann analytes” as follows: Additional information may be requested by governmental agencies. This may include measurements of large numbers of smoke constituents of regulatory interest such as the “Hoffmann analytes” (usually a list of 44 smoke constituents). We have participated in studies requested by Australian and UK agencies and have provided information to Health Canada. Our interpretation of these studies, other studies in the literature, and our own internally-produced data is that these smoke constituents are generally proportional to tar measurements for a given blend style.
2004
At the 58th TSRC, Loureau et al. (2400d) described the influence of cigarette paper and filter ventilation on the yields of “Hoffmann analytes.”
2004
At the CORESTA Congress in Japan, Röper et al. (23A11) presented a paper entitled: “Hoffmann” analytes and cigarette smoke in vitro toxicity revisited – How do the data compare?
2005
Baker and Bishop (172b) did not mention the term “Hoffmann analyte” in the title of their publication on the pyrolysis of non-volatile tobacco ingredients but did note the following: The study has concentrated on the biologically active substances produced by pyrolysis, in particular the “Hoffmann analytes.” These analytes are believed by regulatory authorities in Canada and U.S.A. to be relevant to smokingrelated diseases. They are based on lists published by Hoffmann and co-workers of the American Health Foundation in New York. For the pyrolysis of many of the non-volatile ingredients, no “Hoffmann analytes” were detected amongst the products. When they were occasionally formed, they included phenols, benzene, toluene, styrene and furfural (furfural is biologically active but it does not appear on any of the Hoffmann or regulatory authority lists).
2005
At the CORESTA Joint Study Group Meeting in Stratford-on-Avon, U.K. in 2005, BAT personnel presented the following three papers under the general heading The effect of cigarette design variables on assays of interest to the Tobacco Industry: Case et al. (23A01) presented the first paper subtitled: 1) Experimental design and some initial findings on Hoffmann analyte yields. Sheppard et al. (23A12) presented the second paper subtitled: 2) Prediction of smoke and Hoffmann analytes using two different modeling methods. Winter et al. (23A15) presented the third paper subtitled: 3) Tobacco blend types. Although the latter paper did not include the term “Hoffmann analytes” in its title, its abstract indicated it involved the examination of the potential relationships between various tobacco blend components and “Hoffmann analyte” yields across three distinct lamina tobacco blend styles, Virginia, burley, and Oriental plus a 1:1 Virginia:burley mixture.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1010
11/24/08 12:37:13 PM
1011
“Hoffmann Analytes”
Table XXIII-4 (continued) An Abbreviated Chronology of the use of the Term “Hoffmann Analyte” or Its Equivalent in Tobacco Smoke-Related Scientific Literature Year
Author(s) and Title of Article
2005
At the 59th TSRC, Zemann et al. (4406a) presented a paper entitled: On-line puff-by-puff analysis of gaseous and Hoffmann analytes in cigarette smoke
2006
At the 60th TSRC, Case et al. (23A02) presented a paper entitled: The role of cigarette paper and other factors that influence Hoffmann analyte yields in sidestream smoke.
2006
Also at the 60th TSRC, Streibel et al. (23A13) presented a paper entitled: Real-time on-line characterization of selected Hoffmann analytes in inhaled and exhaled cigarette smoke (mouthspace) by photo ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1011
11/24/08 12:37:13 PM
1012
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1012
11/24/08 12:37:14 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1013
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1013
11/24/08 12:37:14 PM
1014
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1014
11/24/08 12:37:15 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1015
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1015
11/24/08 12:37:16 PM
1016
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1016
11/24/08 12:37:17 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1017
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1017
11/24/08 12:37:18 PM
1018
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1018
11/24/08 12:37:19 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1019
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1019
11/24/08 12:37:20 PM
1020
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1020
11/24/08 12:37:20 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1021
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1021
11/24/08 12:37:21 PM
1022
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1022
11/24/08 12:37:22 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1023
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1023
11/24/08 12:37:23 PM
1024
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1024
11/24/08 12:37:24 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1025
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1025
11/24/08 12:37:25 PM
1026
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1026
11/24/08 12:37:26 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1027
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1027
11/24/08 12:37:27 PM
1028
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1028
11/24/08 12:37:28 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1029
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1029
11/24/08 12:37:29 PM
1030
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1030
11/24/08 12:37:30 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1031
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1031
11/24/08 12:37:31 PM
1032
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1032
11/24/08 12:37:31 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1033
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1033
11/24/08 12:37:32 PM
1034
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1034
11/24/08 12:37:33 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1035
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1035
11/24/08 12:37:34 PM
1036
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1036
11/24/08 12:37:35 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1037
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1037
11/24/08 12:37:36 PM
1038
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1038
11/24/08 12:37:37 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1039
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1039
11/24/08 12:37:38 PM
1040
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1040
11/24/08 12:37:39 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1041
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1041
11/24/08 12:37:42 PM
1042
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1042
11/24/08 12:37:42 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1043
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1043
11/24/08 12:37:43 PM
1044
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1044
11/24/08 12:37:44 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1045
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1045
11/24/08 12:37:45 PM
1046
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1046
11/24/08 12:37:45 PM
“Hoffmann Analytes”
1047
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1047
11/24/08 12:37:46 PM
1048
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-5 (continued) “Hoffmann Analytes” in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1048
11/24/08 12:37:47 PM
1049
“Hoffmann Analytes”
Table XXIII-6 Reported Yields of “Hoffmann Analytes” in 1R4F (174b, 3190, 3370) and 2R4F (688) Mainstream Smoke; Proposed MSS “Hoffmann Analyte” Yield Analyses (23A06) 1R4F 1988
Component
CAS No.
RJRT (3190)
56-55-3 205-99-2
10.5 —
205-82-3 207-08-9 50-32-8 218-01-9 3697-24-3 53-70-3 192-65-4
— — 9.2 — — — —
189-64-0
1R4F
2R4F
Proposed
2002
2004
2003
2000
Rustemeier et al. (3370)
Baker et al. [Table 11 in (174b)]
Chen and Moldoveanu (688)
Department of Health (Canada) (23A06)
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benz[a]anthracene, ng/cig Benzo[b]fluoranthene, ng/cig (benzo[e]acephenanthrylene) Benzo[j]fluoranthene, ng/cig Benzo[k]fluoranthene, ng/cig Benzo[a]pyrene, ng/cig Chrysene, ng/cig Chrysene, 5-methyl-, ng/cig Dibenz[a,h]anthracene, ng/cig Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene, ng/cig (naphtho[1,2,3,4-def]chrysene) Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, ng/cig (dibenzo[b,def]chrysene) Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, ng/cig (benzo[rst]pentaphene) Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, ng/cig (dibenzo[def,p]chrysene) Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, ng/cig
10.1
— —
— —
— —
— —
5.10 14.4 <7.60 <0.60 —
— — 6.51 — — — —
— — 5.51 — — — —
— — 6.96 — — — —
— — × — — — —
—
—
—
—
—
—
189-55-9
—
—
—
—
—
—
191-30-0
—
—
—
—
—
—
193-39-5
—
2.63
—
—
—
—
110-86-1 91-22-5 226-36-8 224-42-0 194-59-2
2.09 0.235 — — —
— — — <2.72 —
7.7 0.34 — — —
7.47 0.30 — — —
7.02 0.23 — — —
× × — — —
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — 107.09 90.69
— — — — — — — — — 133.11 115.61
— — — — — — — — — × ×
5.63
Aza-Arenes Pyridine, μg/cig Quinoline, μg/cig Dibenz[a,h]acridine, ng/cig Dibenz[a,j]acridine, ng/cig 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, ng/cig N-Nitrosamines N-Nitrosodimethylamine, ng/cig N-Nitrosoethylmethylamine, ng/cig N-Nitrosodiethylamine, ng/cig N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine, ng/cig N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine, ng/cig N-Nitrosopyrrolidine, ng/cig N-Nitrosopiperidine, ng/cig N-Nitrosodiethanolamine, ng/cig N-Nitrososarcosine, ng/cig N’-Nitrosonornicotine, ng/cig 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3pyridyl)-1-butanone, ng/cig N’-Nitrosoanabasine, ng/cig N’-Nitrosoanatabine, ng/cig N-Nitrosomorpholine
62-75-9 10595-95-6 55-18-5 621-64-7 924-16-3 930-55-2 100-75-4 1116-54-7 13256-22-9 16543-55-8 64091-91-4
ND ND ND — — 14.0 — — — 101.0 84.0
<4.40 — — — — 12.5 — <4.30 — 124 138
37620-20-5 71267-22-6 59-89-2
18.0 114.0 —
18.6 104.9 —
22 96 —
19.37 122.49 —
16.28 119.02 —
× × —
— — —
— — —
— — 5.1
— — 15.63
— — 15.06
— — ×
106 96
Aromatic Amines 2-Toluidine, ng/cig Aniline, 2,6-dimethyl-, ng/cig 1-Naphthylamine, ng/cig
95-53-4 87-62-7 134-32-7
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1049
11/24/08 12:37:47 PM
1050
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIII-6 (continued) Reported Yields of “Hoffmann Analytes” in 1R4F (174b, 3190, 3370) and 2R4F (688) Mainstream Smoke; Proposed MSS “Hoffmann Analyte” Yield Analyses (23A06) 1R4F 1988
1R4F
2R4F
Proposed
2002
2004
2003
2000
Rustemeier et al. (3370)
Baker et al. [Table 11 in (174b)]
Chen and Moldoveanu (688)
Department of Health (Canada) (23A06)
Component
CAS No.
RJRT (3190)
2-Naphthylamine, ng/cig Biphenyl, 3-amino-, ng/cig Biphenyl, 4-amino-, ng/cig
91-59-8 2243-47-2 92-67-1
— — —
— — —
12.6 3.3 2.3
10.40 3.20 1.94
26148-68-5 68006-83-7 67730-11-4 67730-10-3 105650-23-5 76180-96-6 77094-11-2 62450-06-0 62450-07-1
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
50-00-0 75-07-0 123-38-6 123-72-8 123-73-9 107-02-8 67-94-1 78-93-3
— — — — — — —
16.5 518 — — — 46.3 — —
19.5 674 56.4 35.1 24.9 69.0 338 80.7
22.19 623.88 51.54 33.93 15.90 60.64 293.15 68.08
21.61 560.48 43.92 29.58 16.18 58.77 264.74 62.72
× × × × × × ×
106-99-0 78-79-5 71-43-2 108-88-5 100-42-5
— — 45.2 68.1 2.1
42.7 319 39.8 67.2 —
30.4 361 49.3 89.6 7.9
32.10 308.08 44.33 68.08 6.13
29.94 297.68 43.39 64.91 5.11
× × × × ×
60-35-5 107-13-1 79-06-1 57-14-7 75-52-5 79-46-9 98-95-3 75-01-4 51-79-6 75-21-8 75-56-9 117-81-7 110-00-9 271-89-6
2.2 7.6 1.1 — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — 30.0 — — — — — —
— 9.4 — — — — — — — — — — — —
— 9.51 — — — — — — — — — — — —
— 8.28
— × — — — — — — — — — — — —
108-95-2 95-48-7
6.8 1.8
11.79 3.31
9.80 3.04
9.63 2.62
10.32 2.97 1.73
× × ×
N-Heterocyclic Amines AaC, ng/cig MeAaC, ng/cig Glu-P-1, ng/cig Glu-P-2, ng/cig PhIP, ng/cig IQ, ng/cig MeIQ, ng/cig Trp-P-1, ng/cig Trp-P-2, ng/cig
— — — — — — — — —
Aldehydes and Ketones Formaldehyde, μg/cig Acetaldehyde, μg/cig Propionaldehyde, μg/cig Butyraldehyde, μg/cig Crotonaldehyde, μg/cig Acrolein, μg/cig Acetone, μg/cig 2-Butanone, μg/cig Volatile hydrocarbons 1,3-Butadiene, μg/cig Isoprene, μg/cig Benzene, μg/cig Toluene, μg/cig Styrene, μg/cig Miscellaneous Organic Compounds Acetamide, μg/cig Acrylonitrile, μg/cig Acrylamide, μg/cig Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethyl-, ng/cig Nitromethane, μg/cig 2-Nitropropane, μg/cig Nitrobenzene, μg/cig Vinyl chloride, ng/cig Ethyl carbamate, ng/cig Ethylene oxide, μg/cig Propylene oxide, ng/cig Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, μg/cig Furan, μg/cig Benzo[b]furan, ng/cig Phenols Phenol, μg/cig o-Cresol, μg/cig
7.32 1.89
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1050
11/24/08 12:37:48 PM
1051
“Hoffmann Analytes”
Table XXIII-6 (continued) Reported Yields of “Hoffmann Analytes” in 1R4F (174b, 3190, 3370) and 2R4F (688) Mainstream Smoke; Proposed MSS “Hoffmann Analyte” Yield Analyses (23A06) 1R4F 1988
1R4F
2R4F
Proposed
2002
2004
2003
2000
Rustemeier et al. (3370)
Baker et al. [Table 11 in (174b)]
Chen and Moldoveanu (688)
Department of Health (Canada) (23A06)
Component
CAS No.
RJRT (3190)
m-Cresol, μg/cig p-Cresol, μg/cig Catechol, μg/cig Resorcinol, μg/cig Hydroquinone μg/cig Methyleugenol, μg/cig Caffeic acid, μg/cig
103-39-4 106-44-5 120-80-9 108-46-3 123-31-9 93-15-2 331-39-5
1.6 4.1 38.0 3.0 37.0 — —
2.55 6.36 53.8 0.83 43.3 — —
{8.55
{7.43
{5.84
35.3 <1.1 34.9 — —
40.57 0.94 42.77 — —
37.90 0.91 32.40 — —
× × × × × — —
50-29-3 72-55-0 — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
302-01-2 7440-38-2 7440-41-7 7440-48-4 7440-02-0 7440-47-3 7440-43-9 7439-97-6 7439-92-1 7782-49-2 7440-08-6
— — — — — — — — — — —
— 3.33 — — <2.63 <1.32 24.7 — 10.1 — —
— <15 — — <12 <5 47 6.5 36 <20 —
— 12.21 — — 6.44 57.74 55.09 5.43 42.51 39.81 —
— 10.39 — — 5.12 73.01 47.82 3.82 32.95 34.85 —
— × — — × × × × × × —
54-11-5 630-08-0 7664-41-7 10102-43-9
0.79 11.3 18.0 — 234 89.0 —
0.74 10.0 — — 263 80.8 —
0.74 — — — — — —
0.80 12.26 12.90 319.88 348.34 128.93 9.38
0.75 11.96 11.02 223.41 268.98 109.20 8.91
× × × × × × ×
Chloroaromatic Compounds DDT DDE Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins Polychlorodibenzofurans Inorganic Components Hydrazine Arsenic, ng/cig Beryllium Cobalt Nickel, ng/cig Chromium (VI), ng/cig Cadmium, ng/cig Mercury ng/cig Lead, ng/cig Selenium ng/cig Polonium-210 Additional Components Nicotine, mg/cig Carbon monoxide, mg/cig Ammonia, μg/cig Nitric oxide, μg/cig Nitrogen oxides, μg/cig Hydrogen cyanide, μg/cig “Tar”, mg/cig
74-90-8
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C023.indd 1051
11/24/08 12:37:48 PM
24
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
For nearly four decades after the early 1950s an exceptional amount of information was generated on the composition of the various types of tobacco, the smoke from many of the types, and the relationship between the two. Although much of the information has been published, much has not. Exemplary in this regard was the research conducted by personnel not only at the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company but also at many other tobacco companies. Much information has been published in peer-reviewed journals and the remainder is available on the Internet. In the early tobacco and tobacco smoke studies, the chemical nature of one or two components was defined by means of classical chemical procedures, for example, the identification of the terpenoid alcohol solanesol in flue-cured tobacco (3359), the phenols eugenol and isoeugenol in the mainstream smoke (MSS) from Oriental tobacco (3280), and maltol in the MSS from an ingredient-free German tobacco blend (1131). However, as analytical methodology became more sophisticated and precise, many more components—sometimes several hundred newly identified in tobacco or smoke—were reported in a single publication. In 1986, each major U.S. cigarette manufacturer listed the ingredients used at that time in its cigarette products. A combined list was submitted to the U.S. Office of Smoking and Health. That list, comprising 599 additives, was subjected by a panel of eminent toxicologists not only to an extensive literature survey but also to an examination of unpublished data provided by the tobacco industry members on the chemistry and toxicology of the ingredients. The panel assessed the safety of each listed ingredient with regard to its pyrolysate components and its possible effect when added to cigarette tobacco on the chemical and biological properties of the cigarette mainstream smoke. The results were summarized in 1994 by Doull et al. (1053). Of the 599 ingredients, 460 (∼77 %) are individual compounds. The remaining items are mixtures such as natural oils, plant extracts, oleoresins, etc. Many investigators have noted in their publications that numerous compounds on the list of ingredients are tobacco and/or cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) components. The following pages chronicle such a relationship between individual added components and their presence in untreated tobacco and/or its smoke. While Paschke et al. (2896) attempted to catalog every material ever added to tobacco and its effect on MSS chemical and/ or biological properties, this chapter deals only with those materials in the list by Doull et al. Although some of the additives cataloged by Paschke et al. did reduce the responses in specific bioassays and the levels of some MSS components
considered toxic, they also rendered the MSS unacceptable to the consumer. Obviously, the ingredients listed by Doull et al. did not suffer from such a problem since their addition was specifically designed to enhance the acceptability to consumers of the MSS from the product. As a beginning, Doull et al. (1053) in their report noted: Many of the ingredients added to cigarettes are identical or essentially similar in composition to natural leaf tobacco components.
In their 1998 report of the effect on rats of inhalation of MSS from ingredient-treated tobacco cigarettes, Gaworski et al. (24A04) expressed a similar view: The addition of flavoring ingredients to the cigarette prior to smoking did not significantly alter the type or extent of biologic changes normally seen in smoke-exposed rodents. Given the fact that many of the added flavoring ingredients are structurally similar or identical to natural constituents of tobacco leaf or of tobacco smoke itself [Lloyd et al. (2389)], these results are not totally unexpected.
Later, Rustemeier et al. (3370) in their description of the chemistry of MSS from ingredient-treated tobacco cigarettes noted: Many of these compounds or mixtures are also natural constituents of the tobacco leaf.
Rodgman (3263) concurred with the preceding statements when he wrote: Many flavorful tobacco additives listed by Doull et al. are structurally identical with or similar to highly polar, volatile components identified in the aqueous alcohol-soluble portion of cigarette MSS and tobacco.
More recently, Rodgman and Green (3300) wrote: With the capability to isolate and identify highly polar and volatile components of tobacco and its MSS, it was obvious that many were identical with or similar to ingredients of flavor formulations added to specific tobacco blends to impart unique smoking characteristics … Many “topdressing” components are structurally identical with or similar to identified tobacco components. With no evidence to the contrary, it is assumed that such an individual added flavorant would behave during the smoking process (in terms of direct transfer to smoke or degradation, reaction, etc.) much in the same manner as the naturally occurring tobacco component.
While many investigators considered many individual compounds added to cigarette tobacco filler to be tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components, it seemed worthwhile to catalog the extent to which this was true. Obviously, if 1053
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1053
11/13/08 5:53:13 PM
1054
a specific flavorful compound is already a tobacco component, then its addition to tobacco is an attempt to enhance its flavorful effect. If it is a compound generated during the smoking process, then its addition to tobacco enhances the level in the smoke by tobacco-to-smoke transfer. The compounds added as ingredients to cigarette tobacco may fall into one of the following categories: • It is a component of one or more of the tobacco types (flue-cured, Oriental, burley, Maryland) commonly used in cigarette blends. • It is a component of cigarette MSS. • It is a component of both tobacco and tobacco smoke. • It is not a component of either the tobaccos or their smoke. An ingredient compositionally similar to but not identical with a tobacco leaf or smoke component may be categorized as an isomer or an homolog of a compound identified in natural tobacco leaf and/or its smoke. In the broad spectrum of chemistry, biochemistry, and biology, cases exist where the properties of one homolog vary significantly from those of another or where the properties of one isomer differ significantly from those of another. For example, whether classified as a “Group 2A carcinogen” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (1868a), or a significant carcinogen in cigarette MSS by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727), or overall as a borderline carcinogen by others, for example, Dipple et al. (983), the specific tumorigenicity of mice skin painted or subcutaneously injected with benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) is insignificant compared to that of its homolog, 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMB[a] A). The isomeric C20H12 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and benzo[e]pyrene (B[e] P) differ markedly in their specific tumorigenicities in studies involving mouse skin painting or subcutaneous injection (983). B[a]P under appropriate laboratory conditions is one of the most potent tumorigens known, whereas the isomeric B[e] P under the same conditions is essentially nontumorigenic. In the 1950s, the organic solvent extraction of tobacco was studied extensively with the purpose of removing PAH precursors from the tobacco. One process involved an aqueous ethanol-hexane partition to separate the polar, more flavorful tobacco components from the lipophilic PAH precursors. At that time, little was known about the nature of the polar tobacco components although it was apparent they made a considerable positive contribution to the flavor and aroma of cigarette MSS. Despite the lack of knowledge about the precise nature of the polar components, it was demonstrated they were not significant PAH precursors (3262). The lack of knowledge about the polar tobacco components was due to our inability to separate highly polar compounds in a complex mixture. This situation continued during years of intensive effort on cigarette MSS composition but was finally resolved and utilized by Schumacher et al. (3553) in the 1970s.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Among 1545 MSS components identified by Schumacher et al. (3553), Newell et al. (2769), and Heckman and Best (1587) were over 800 components new to the tobacco smoke literature, many of which were highly polar. By glass capillary gas chromatography, Grob (1416) also identified many polar components in the MSS from cigarettes containing additivefree tobacco. Later, it was shown that some of the identified polar components reported in MSS by Grob are also in the Doull et al. list (1053). With regard to tobacco, Lloyd et al. (2389) identified 275 previously unidentified components of additive-free fluecured tobacco, 132 new to all tobacco types. Many of these compounds were highly polar and considered significant contributors to MSS flavor and aroma. Similar studies were conducted on the composition of burley (3219), Oriental (3561, and Maryland (3550) tobaccos. Later, it became apparent that many of the highly polar components of tobacco and tobacco smoke were identical with or similar to many of the components used in the flavor additive formulations, that is, the “top dressing,” added to a specific tobacco blend to impart its unique smoking characteristics (1053). As previously mentioned, in the mid-1980s, each major U.S. cigarette manufacturer listed the ingredients added to its cigarette products at that time. In 1986, a combined list, comprising 599 entities, was submitted to the U.S. Office of Smoking and Health. From an extensive literature survey and examination of much unpublished data from the cigarette manufacturers on the chemistry and toxicology of the ingredients, a panel of eminent toxicologists assessed the safety of each listed ingredient with regard to its pyrolysis products and its possible effect when added to cigarette tobacco on the chemical and biological properties of cigarette mainstream smoke. Subsequently, Doull et al. (1053) listed the ingredients assessed and summarized the conclusions of the panel on their effect on the chemical and biological properties of cigarette smoke. In their assessment of available information on these ingredients variously used as cigarette tobacco ingredients, Doull et al. concluded that none of the materials used as flavorants on smoking tobacco products, particularly cigarettes marketed by U.S. manufacturers, imparted any significant adverse chemical or biological properties to the MSS from the ingredient-treated tobacco. However, Doull et al. did not publish an overview of the studies and reports they had examined or provide any details on their analysis. In their detailed assessment of reported chemical and biological properties of the MSS from cigarettes fabricated with tobacco with or without one or more additives, Paschke et al. (2895) reached a similar conclusion; namely, that in general, no significant increase in the biological activity of tobacco was reported from cigarettes containing specifically described added ingredients. In his examination of extensive laboratory data generated from additives and additive-treated cigarettes between the mid-1950s and the late 1970s, Rodgman (3263, 3264) reached a conclusion similar to that of Doull et al. (1053) and Paschke et al. (2896).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1054
11/13/08 5:53:14 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
Previously [see Table 1 in (3266)], the individual compounds listed by Doull et al. (1053) as possible U.S. cigarette ingredients were assigned a number somewhat indicative of the alphabetical order in which the 460 individual components were listed. That numerical listing is provided in Table XXIV-1A. A similar number assignment [see Table 7A in (3266)] was made in the case of individual components used as tobacco ingredients by cigarette manufactures outside of the United States. That numerical listing appears in Table XXIV-1B. In each case, a few citations on the identification of the component in tobacco and/or smoke were included in the previous publication [see Tables 1 and 7A in (3266)] to indicate that the ingredient was indeed a tobacco and/or tobacco smoke component. A more complete listing of citations on the identification of the ingredient in tobacco and/ or smoke is included in Table XXIV-2. Examination of the Reference column in Table XXIV-2 indicates that the number of references for many of the tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components used as ingredients is substantial. They not only include reports on the identification of the component in additive-free tobacco and/or its tobacco smoke but also reports on the effect of the added ingredient on MSS composition, particularly references dealing with “Hoffmann analyte” yields. In several instances, ingredients not previously included as tobacco and/or smoke components in (3266) are cataloged in Table XXIV-2 because of their identification in tobacco after the publication of (3266), for example, previously unidentified 2-hexenol and several naphthalene derivatives identified in tobacco by Peng et al. (2917a) and several esters identified in tobacco by Leffingwell and Alford (2339a). Examination of the data presented previously [see Tables 1 and 7A in (3266)] permits verification of the statements by numerous investigators that many of the ingredients in the Doull et al. list have been identified as components in untreated tobacco types and/or the MSS from cigarettes containing such tobaccos. Such an examination also permits an assessment of the effect of a number of the listed ingredients that have been reported in a variety of studies to not adversely affect the chemical or biological properties of the MSS from cigarettes containing such ingredients or the chemical properties of the pyrolysates from individual ingredients. Table XXIV-2 catalogs those individual compounds that have been identified in untreated tobacco and/or its tobacco smoke and are listed by Doull et al. (1053) as tobacco additives used by U.S. cigarette manufacturers in and prior to 1994. The references cited are pertinent not only to their tobacco/tobacco smoke identification but also to their effect on the chemical and biological properties of the MSS from cigarettes containing ingredient-treated tobacco. The components are cross-referenced to the numbers assigned to their listing in the Doull et al. (1053) and Baker et al. (174b, 174c, 24A01) articles (see Tables XXIV-1A and 1B). Over 260 of the 460 compounds (57%) listed by Doull et al. and nineteen of the fifty compounds (38%) in the Baker et al. list have been identified as components in additive-free tobacco and/ or its smoke.
1055
In 1957, Wynder (4296) proposed that reduction of the per cigarette “tar” yield by about 50% would have beneficial health-related results. By the late 1970s to the early 1980s the tobacco industry had exceeded the suggested reduction by generating the low-“tar” and ultralow-“tar” cigarette. This led to the criticisms and assertions that (1) some commercial low-“tar” brands might have additive levels much higher than those in previous high- and medium-“tar” cigarettes and (2) the fates during the cigarette smoking process of many individual added components were unknown. The criticisms and assertions of the early 1980s about tobacco additives were not new but an extension of those made earlier, for example, in 1967, Wynder and Hoffmann wrote about additives [see pp. 488 and 628 in (4332)]: The importance of flavor-enhancing agents as contributors to the tumorigenicity in the experimental animals varies for different tobacco products. For cigarettes it may be a minor factor compared to the overwhelming effects of other constituents and variables. Nevertheless, one should emphasize that further studies on the toxicity of flavorants and their combustion products could provide a scientific basis for the selection of less harmful additives … In evaluating the effect of tobacco additives, we need to consider whether such additions may contribute to the production of tumorigenic agents during the smoking of a tobacco product. If an additive increases the formation of carcinogenic substances during smoking to an analytically significant extent, it would, of course, be most undesirable. If, however, an additive should inhibit the production of tumorigenic agents during smoking and at the same time not yield other types of toxic substances, it may represent an effective and useful agent.
However, the proponents of problems with added tobacco ingredients became more vocal when the nearly 70% reduction in sales-weighted MSS “tar” yield achieved by 1985 not only answered the “tar” criticisms of the late 1950s and early 1960s but exceeded the goal that halving the “tar” yield was a means to lower lung cancer incidence in cigarette smokers (4296). In 1980, LaVoie et al. (24A07) wrote: The development of the low-tar, low-nicotine cigarette required cigarette fillers with a potential for smoke flavor contribution to make these cigarettes acceptable to the consumer. Such products can be realized either by selecting tobaccos rich in flavor or by addition of tobacco extracts or certain plant extracts, addition of synthetic flavor compounds, or a combination of several of these factors … New cigarettes should be assayed for toxicity and tumorigenicity, so that the reduction of toxic and tumorigenic effects in the smoke of low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes is not offset by the introduction of unknown factors.
Despite their criticism of the possible increased use of flavorants in the filler of low-“tar,” low-nicotine cigarettes, the authors admitted that prior to 1980, the U.S. cigarette manufacturers had, apparently achieved a “reduction of toxic and tumorigenic effects in the smoke of low-‘tar,’ low-nicotine cigarettes.”
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1055
11/13/08 5:53:15 PM
1056
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-1A As Listed by Doull et al. (1053), Individual Ingredient Components Used in U.S. Smoking Products Note: The assigned numbers are those assigned by Rodgman (3266) to the individual component ingredients listed alphabetically in their more or less common name by Doull et al. (1053). Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
1a 2 3
Acetanisole Acetic acid Acetoin
4 5
Assigned No. 49
Name in Doull et al. (1053) 1,3-Butanediol
Assigned No. 97
50
2,3-Butanedione
Acetophenone 6-Acetoxydihydrotheaspirane
51 52 53
1-Butanol 2-Butanone 4-(2-Butylidene-3,5,5-trimethyl)2-cyclohexen-1-one
6 7 8 9 10
2-Acetyl-3-ethylpyrazine 2-Acetyl-5-methylfuran Acetylpyrazine 2-Acetylpyridine 3-Acetylpyridine
54 55 56 57 58
Butyl acetate Butyl butyrate Butyl butyryl lactate Butyl isovalerate Butyl phenylacetate
102 103 104 105 106
11
2-Acetylthiazole
59
Butyl undecylenate
107
12 13
Aconitic acid dl-Alanine
60 61
3-Butylidenephthalide Butyric acid
108 109
14
Allyl hexanoate
62
Cadinene
110
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Allylionone Ammonia Ammonium bicarbonate Ammonium hydroxide Ammonium phosphate dibasic Ammonium sulfide Amyl alcohol Amyl butyrate Amyl formate Amyl octanoate
63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96
Caffeine Calcium carbonate Camphene Carbon dioxide
111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144
a-Amylcinnamaldehyde Anethole transAnisyl acetate Anisyl alcohol Anisyl formate Anisyl phenylacetate l-Arginine Ascorbic acid l-Asparagine monohydrate l-Aspartic acid Benzaldehyde Benzaldehyde glyceryl acetal Benzoic acid Benzoin Benzophenone Benzyl alcohol Benzyl benzoate Benzyl butyrate Benzyl cinnamate Benzyl propionate Benzyl salicylate Bisabolene Borneol Bornyl acetate
b-Carotene cis-transCarvacrol 4-Carvomenthenol 1-Carvone b-Caryophyllene b-Caryophyllene oxide Cellulose Cinnamaldehyde Cinnamic acid Cinnamyl acetate Cinnamyl alcohol Cinnamyl cinnamate Cinnamyl isovalerate Cinnamyl propionate Citral Citric acid dl-Citronellol Citronellyl butyrate Citronellyl isobutyrate Cuminaldehyde p-Cymene l-Cysteine trans, trans-2,4-Decadienal d-Decalactone g-Decalactone Decanal Decanoic acid 1-Decanol 3-Decenal Dehydromenthofurolactone
Name in Doull et al. (1053) Diethyl malonate
98 99
Diethyl sebacate Diethylpyrazine (3 isomers)
100
Dihydroanethole
101
5,7-Dihydro-2-methylthieno[3,4-d] pyrimidine m-Dimethoxybenzene p-Dimethoxybenzene 2,6-Dimethoxyphenol Dimethyl succinate 3,4-Dimethyl-1,2cyclopentanedione 3,5-Dimethyl-1,2cyclopentanedione 3,7-Dimethyl-1,3,6-octatriene 4,5-Dimethyl-3-hydroxy2,5-dihydrofuran-2-one 6,10-Dimethyl-5,9-undecadien2-one 3,7-Dimethyl-6-octenoic acid 2,4-Dimethylacetophenone a,p-Dimethylbenzyl alcohol a,a-Dimethylphenethyl acetate a,a-Dimethylphenethyl butyrate 2,3-Dimethylpyrazine 2,5-Dimethylpyrazine 2,6-Dimethylpyrazine Dimethyltetrahydrobenzofuranone d-Dodecalactone g-Dodecalactone p-Ethoxybenzaldehyde Ethyl 10-undecenoate Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate Ethyl acetate Ethyl acetoacetate Ethyl alcohol Ethyl benzoate Ethyl butyrate Ethyl cinnamate Ethyl decanoate Ethyl fenchol Ethyl furoate Ethyl heptanoate Ethyl hexanoate Ethyl isovalerate Ethyl lactate Ethyl laurate Ethyl levulinate Ethylmaltol Ethyl methylphenylglycidate Ethyl myristate Ethyl nonanoate Ethyl octadecanoate
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1056
11/13/08 5:53:16 PM
1057
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
Table XXIV-1A (continued) As Listed by Doull et al. (1053), Individual Ingredient Components Used in U.S. Smoking Products Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
Assigned No.
Ethyl octanoate Ethyl oleate Ethyl palmitate Ethyl phenylacetate Ethyl propionate Ethyl salicylate Ethyl trans-2-butenoate Ethyl valerate Ethylvanillin 2-Ethyl-3-methoxypyrazine 2-Ethyl-5-methoxypyrazine 2-Ethyl-6-methoxypyrazine 2-Methyl-3-methoxypyrazine 2-Methyl-5-methoxypyrazine 2-Methyl-6-methoxypyrazine 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 3-Ethyl-2-hydroxy-2cyclopenten-1-one 2-Ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine 2-Ethyl-3,6-dimethylpyrazine
193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209
2-Heptenal Heptyl acetate w-6-Hexadecenlactone g-Hexalactone Hexanal Hexanoic acid 2-Hexen-1-ol 3-Hexen-1-ol cis-3-Hexen-1-yl acetate 2-Hexenal 2-Hexenoic acid 3-Hexenoic acid 3-Hexenyl formate Hexyl 2-methylbutyrate Hexyl acetate Hexyl alcohol Hexyl phenylacetate
241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257
Isobutyric acid dl-Isoleucine a-Isomethylionone 2-Isopropylphenol Isovaleric acid Lactic acid Lauric acid Lauric aldehyde l-Leucine Levulinic acid Linalool Linalool oxide Linalyl acetate l-Lysine Malic acid Maltol Maltyl isobutyrate
210 211
258 259
p-Mentha-8-thiol-3-one l-Menthol; l-menthol (synthetic)
212
260
l-Menthone
165
5-Ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl2(5H)-furanone 2-Ethyl-3-methylpyrazine
261
Menthyl acetate
166 167 168 169 170 171
4-Ethylbenzaldehyde 4-Ethylguaiacol p-Ethylphenol 3-Ethylpyridine Eucalyptol Farnesol
214 215 216 217 218 219
l-Histidine 5-Hydroxy-2,4-decadienoic acid d-lactone 2,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)furanone 2-Hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-2cyclohex-1-one 4-Hydroxy-3-pentenoic acid lactone 2-Hydroxy-4-methylbenzaldehyde 4-Hydroxybutanoic acid lactone Hydroxycitronellal 6-Hydroxydihydrotheaspirane 4-(p-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone
262 263 264 265 266 267
172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192
d-Fenchone Furfurylmercaptan 4-(2-Furyl)-3-buten-2-one Geraniol Geranyl acetate Geranyl butyrate Geranyl formate Geranyl isovalerate Geranyl phenylacetate l-Glutamic acid l-Glutamine Glycerol Glycyrrhizin, ammoniated Guaiacol 2,4-Heptadienal g-Heptalactone Heptanoic acid 2-Heptanone 3-Hepten-2-one 2-Hepten-4-one 4-Heptenal
220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240
a-Ionone b-Ionone a-Irone Isoamyl acetate Isoamyl benzoate Isoamyl butyrate Isoamyl cinnamate Isoamyl formate Isoamyl hexanoate Isoamyl isovalerate Isoamyl octanoate Isoamyl phenylacetate Isobornyl acetate Isobutyl acetate Isobutyl alcohol Isobutyl cinnamate Isobutyl phenylacetate Isobutyl salicylate 2-Isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine a-Isobutylphenethyl alcohol Isobutyraldehyde
268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288
dl-Methionine Methoprene 2-Methoxy-4-methylphenol 2-Methoxy-4-vinylphenol p-Methoxybenzaldehyde 1-( p-Methoxyphenyl)-1-penten3-one 4-(p-Methoxyphenyl)-2-butanone 1-(p-Methoxyphenyl)-2-propanone Methoxypyrazine Methyl 2-furoate Methyl 2-octynoate Methyl 2-pyrrolyl ketone Methyl anisate Methyl anthranilate Methyl benzoate Methyl cinnamate Methyl dihydrojasmonate Methyl isovalerate Methyl linoleate Methyl linolenate Methyl naphthyl ketone Methyl nicotinate Methyl phenylacetate Methyl salicylate Methyl sulfide 3-Methylcyclopentadecanone 4-Methyl-1-phenyl-2-pentanone
145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164
213
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1057
11/13/08 5:53:18 PM
1058
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-1A (continued) As Listed by Doull et al. (1053), Individual Ingredient Components Used in U.S. Smoking Products Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
337 338
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid d-Octalactone
383 384
Potassium sorbate l-Proline
339 340
g-Octalactone Octanal
385 386
5-Propenylguaethol Propionic acid
341 342
Octanoic acid 1-Octanol
387 388
Propyl acetate Propyl p-hydroxybenzoate
343 344
2-Octanone 3-Octen-2-one
389 390
Propylene glycol 3-Propylidenephthalide
345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364
1-Octen-3-ol 1-Octen-3-yl acetate 2-Octenal Octyl isobutyrate Oleic acid Palmitic acid w-Pentadecalactone 2,3-Pentanedione 2-Pentanone 4-Pentenoic acid 2-Pentylpyridine a-Phellandrene 2-Phenethyl acetate Phenethyl alcohol Phenethyl butyrate Phenethyl cinnamate Phenethyl isobutyrate Phenethyl isovalerate Phenethyl phenylacetate Phenethyl salicylate
391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410
Pyridine Pyroligneous acid Pyrrole Pyruvic acid Rhodinol Salicylaldehyde Sclareolide Skatole Sodium acetate Sodium benzoate Sodium bicarbonate Sodium carbonate Sodium chloride Sodium citrate Sodium hydroxide Solanone Sucrose octaacetate Sugar alcohols Sugars b Tannic acid
365 366 367
1-Phenyl-1-propanol 3-Phenyl-1-propanol 2-Phenyl-2-butenal
411 412 413
d-Tartaric acid a-Terpineol Terpinolene
321 322 323
5-Methyl-2-phenyl-2-hexenal 5-Methyl-2thiophenecarboxaldehyde 6-Methyl-3,5-heptadien-2-one 2-Methyl-(p-isopropylphenyl)propionaldehyde 5-Methyl-3-hexen-2-one 4-Isopropyl-3-methoxy1-methylbenzene 4-Methyl-3-penten-2-one 2-Methyl-4phenylbutyraldehyde 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one 4-Methyl-5-thiazoleethanol 4-Methyl-5-vinylthiazole Methyl-a-ionone 4-Methylacetophenone p-Methylanisole a-Methylbenzyl acetate a-Methylbenzyl alcohol 2-Methylbutyraldehyde 3-Methylbutyraldehyde 2-Methylbutyric acid a-Methylcinnamaldehyde Methylcyclopentenolone 2-Methylheptanoic acid 2-Methylhexanoic acid 3-Methylpentanoic acid 4-Methylpentanoic acid 2-Methylpyrazine 5-Methylquinoxaline 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran-3one Methyl methylthiopyrazine 3-Methylthiopropionaldehyde Methyl 3-methylthiopropionate 2-Methylvaleric acid Myristaldehyde Myristic acid
368 369 370
4-Phenyl-3-buten-2-ol 4-Phenyl-3-buten-2-one Phenylacetaldehyde
414 415 416
324
b-Naphthyl ethyl ether
371
Phenylacetic acid
417
325
Nerol
372
l-Phenylalanine
418
326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 336
Nerolidol 2,6-Nonadienal 2,6-Nonadien-1-ol g-Nonalactone Nonanal Nonanoic acid 2-Nonanone 2-Nonen-1-ol 2-Nonenal 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid
373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382
3-Phenylpropionaldehyde 3-Phenylpropionic acid 3-Phenylpropyl acetate 3-Phenylpropyl cinnamate 2-(3-Phenylpropyl)tetrahydrofuran Phosphoric acid
419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428
a-Terpinyl acetate 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydroquinoxaline 1,5,5,9-Tetramethyl-13oxatricyclo[8,3,0,0(4,9)]tridecane 2,3,4,5Tetramethylethylcyclohexanone 3,4,5,6Tetramethylethylcyclohexanone 2,3,5,6-Tetramethylpyrazine Thiamine hydrochloride Thiazole l-Threonine Thymol a-Tocopherol o-Tolualdehyde m-Tolualdehyde p-Tolualdehyde p-Tolyl 3-methylbutyrate
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320
a-Pinene b-Pinene d-Piperitone Piperonal
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1058
11/13/08 5:53:19 PM
1059
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
Table XXIV-1A (continued) As Listed by Doull et al. (1053), Individual Ingredient Components Used in U.S. Smoking Products Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
Assigned No.
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
Assigned No.
2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohexa-1,3-dienylmethane 4-(2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohexa-1,3dienyl)-but-2-en-4-one 2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohexanone
452
Valencene
453
Valeraldehyde
454
Valeric acid
l-Tyrosine
455 456 457 458 459 460
g-Valerolactone Valine Vanillin Veratraldehyde Water 3,4-Xylenol
429
p-Tolylacetaldehyde
441
430
p-Tolyl acetate
442
431
p-Tolyl isobutyrate
443
433 434 435 436 437 438 439
Triacetin 2-Tridecanone 2-Tridecenal Triethyl citrate 3,5,5-Trimethyl-1-hexanol p,a,a-Trimethylbenzyl alcohol 4-(2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-2enyl)-but-2-en-4-one 2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-2ene-1,4-dione
445 446 447 448 449 450 451
440
d-Undecalactone g-Undecalactone Undecanal 2-Undecanone 10-Undecenal Urea
Name in Doull et al. (1053)
A number in bold print indicates the component has been identified as a tobacco and/or a tobacco smoke component (see Table XXIV-2).
a
Sugars include glucose, fructose, sucrose, galactose, and mannose
b
Table XXIV-1B As Listed by Baker et al. (174a), Individual Ingredient Components Not Used in U.S. Smoking Products but Used Outside of the U.S. Assigned No.
Name In
Assigned No.
Name In
Assigned No.
Name In
1A 2A 3A 4Ab 5A 6A 7A 8A 9A 10A 11A
Ambroxide Ammonium glycyrrhizinatea Amyl hexanoate Anisole Anisyl propionate Benzyl formate Benzyl isobutyrate Benzyl isovalerate Bornyl isovalerate Butyl valerate d-Carvone
18A 19A 20A 21A 22A 23A 24A 25A 26A 27A 28A
Ethyl isobutyrate Hexen-2-al 2-Hexenol 2-Hexenyl acetate Ionone Isoamyl propionate Isoamyl salicylate Isobutyl butyrate dl-Isomenthone Isopropyl myristate Linalyl benzoate
35A 36A 37A 38A 39A 40A 41A 42A 43A 44A 45A
12A
Cinnamyl isobutyrate
29A
Linalyl isobutyrate
46A
13A
Citronellal
30A
Methional
47A
14A
Citronellyl acetate
31A
48A
15A 16A 17A
Cyclamen aldehyde Dextrin 3-Ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl3(2H)-furanone
32A 33A 34A
5H-5-Methyl-6,7dihydrocyclopenta-[b]pyrazine Menthyl isovalerate Methyl anthranilate c 1-Methyl-2,3-cyclohexadione
Methylcyclopentenolone 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one Methyl 2-octynate 4-Methyl-5-thiazole ethanol Neryl acetate d-Nonalactone Pectin Pent-4-en-4-olide Potassium citrate Rose oxide Sodium ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoate Sodium methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate Sodium propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate Sorbic acid
49A 50A
Sorbitol Tetradecalactone
a
The Doull et al. list dos not include this item per se but does include glycyrrhizin, ammoniated (see Table XXIV-1A, item No. 184).
b
A number in bold print indicates the component has been identified as a tobacco and/or a tobacco smoke component (see Table XXIV-2).
c
Methyl anthranilate, a component in the Doull et al. list, was inadvertently listed in Table 7A in (3266)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1059
11/13/08 5:53:20 PM
1060
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients Note: The number is square brackets [ ] is that previously assigned (3266) to the tobacco ingredient component listed by Doull et al. (1053); The number with an A in square brackets [ ] is that previously assigned (3266) to the tobacco ingredient component listed by Baker et al. (174b, 174c, 24A01) The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1060
11/13/08 5:53:22 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1061
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1061
11/13/08 5:53:23 PM
1062
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1062
11/13/08 5:53:24 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1063
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1063
11/13/08 5:53:25 PM
1064
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1064
11/13/08 5:53:27 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1065
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1065
11/13/08 5:53:31 PM
1066
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1066
11/13/08 5:53:32 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1067
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1067
11/13/08 5:53:36 PM
1068
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1068
11/13/08 5:53:37 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1069
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1069
11/13/08 5:53:41 PM
1070
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1070
11/13/08 5:53:42 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1071
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1071
11/13/08 5:53:46 PM
1072
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1072
11/13/08 5:53:48 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1073
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1073
11/13/08 5:53:56 PM
1074
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1074
11/13/08 5:53:59 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1075
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1075
11/13/08 5:54:00 PM
1076
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1076
11/13/08 5:54:04 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1077
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1077
11/13/08 5:54:05 PM
1078
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1078
11/13/08 5:54:09 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1079
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1079
11/13/08 5:54:10 PM
1080
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1080
11/13/08 5:54:16 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1081
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1081
11/13/08 5:54:17 PM
1082
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1082
11/13/08 5:54:21 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1083
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1083
11/13/08 5:54:22 PM
1084
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1084
11/13/08 5:54:25 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1085
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1085
11/13/08 5:54:27 PM
1086
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1086
11/13/08 5:54:30 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1087
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1087
11/13/08 5:54:31 PM
1088
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1088
11/13/08 5:54:35 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1089
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1089
11/13/08 5:54:36 PM
1090
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1090
11/13/08 5:54:40 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1091
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1091
11/13/08 5:54:41 PM
1092
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1092
11/13/08 5:54:45 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1093
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1093
11/13/08 5:54:46 PM
1094
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1094
11/13/08 5:54:50 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1095
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1095
11/13/08 5:54:51 PM
1096
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1096
11/13/08 5:54:55 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1097
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1097
11/13/08 5:54:56 PM
1098
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1098
11/13/08 5:55:00 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1099
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1099
11/13/08 5:55:01 PM
1100
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1100
11/13/08 5:55:05 PM
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
1101
Table XXIV-2 (Continued) Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1101
11/13/08 5:55:08 PM
1102
In the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1979 report [see pp. 63–64 in (4005)] the following was written: The trend toward low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes and toward a reduction of undesirable volatile smoke compounds has brought about major changes in the smoke flavor of cigarettes. The use of rolled stems and reconstituted tobacco sheet admixed with leaf lamina and the use of effective filter tips are major factors inducing changes in smoke flavor. All of these developments have led to increased use of flavor additives, especially for low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes. In fact, these new cigarettes require flavor corrections by additives in order to be acceptable to the consumer. Tobacco extracts as well as nontobacco flavors, such as licorice, cocoa, fruit, spices, and floral compositions, are used … At present, the selection of tobacco flavor additives from the GRAS (Generally Regarded As Safe) List or from natural extract and the screening of their smoke decomposition products for toxicity or other biological activity are not required by law and are done voluntarily by manufacturers.
Temperatures to which flavorants added to tobacco are exposed and the duration of the exposure during the smoking process range from 500 to 700ºC and the few seconds of the puff duration, respectively. Many of the flavor additives listed by the Surgeon General are used in cooking and/ or baking where the exposure temperatures are lower than in the smoked cigarette but the exposure time to the elevated temperature is much longer. This raises the question: Will more toxic compounds be formed from a given flavorant during food preparation or during cigarette smoking? When questioned about the need to determine the generation of toxic substances from a GRAS list additive used in cooking and/or baking, the FDA stated such studies were not required of the foodstuff manufacturer nor could they be done by the FDA since it had neither the staff, facilities, nor funds to undertake such studies. In the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1981 report [see pp. 51–52 in (4009)] it was noted: Humectants and flavoring agents have long been used as additives in cigarette manufacture … In recent years, cigarette manufacturers’ advertisements have focused on the flavor of new lower “tar” and nicotine cigarettes, enhanced presumably by the addition of tobacco constituents or by the addition of new flavoring materials, such as natural and synthetic chemicals. The identities and amounts of the additives actually used in the manufacture of U.S. cigarettes are not known. Systematic information has not been published or made available on the influence of these additives on the composition or biological activity of cigarette smoke.
A similar comment was made in the 1982 Surgeon General’s report [see pp. 217–218 in (4010)]: The development of the low-tar cigarette required enrichment of smoke flavors in order to make the product acceptable to the consumer. The flavor is enhanced by addition of undescribed materials that may include concentrates of flavor precursors obtained from tobacco, licorice, extracts from other plants, or semisynthetic or fully synthetic flavor components. Because these additives have not been identified, no
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke judgment can be made as to whether they result in new compounds or higher concentrations of hazardous components in the smoke. The practice of flavor enrichment requires detailed toxicological studies that are not available at present for scientific evaluation of their impact [LaVoie et al. (2314c); USPHS (4005)].
In the 1994 report by Doull et al. (1053) and the 2000 report by Paschke et al. (2895) on their analysis of reports on the effects of added cigarette tobacco ingredients on the chemical and biological properties of its MSS, both groups essentially reached the same conclusion: The added ingredients under the conditions of use contributed no adverse chemical or biological properties to the MSS. In their 1997 review of the “changing cigarette,” Hoffmann et al. (1716) did not discuss low-“tar” cigarettes or the presumed use of additional flavoring materials, identity unknown. In a second 1997 article on cigarette design changes implemented between 1950 and 1995, Hoffmann and Hoffmann [see pp. 345–346 in (1740)] discussed the casing additives sugars and humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol) but did not mention that some cigarette manufacturers do not use diethylene glycol. The transfer of humectants to cigarette MSS and their significant contribution to FTC “tar” yield were ignored. On flavor additives, they wrote: In April 1994, the major U.S. cigarette companies released a list of 599 additives used at that time for the manufacture of cigarette [Doull et al. (1053)]. However, in the past, additional reactive flavor additives have been used (such as angelica lactone and linalool oxide; Leffingwell (2336)). An exception is menthol, which amounts to less than 2.5 mg in U.S. mentholated cigarette [Perfetti and Gordin (2923)]. Menthol is not carcinogenic in rodents [National Cancer Institute (24A10)], nor does this readily volatilized compound give rise to measurable amounts of carcinogenic hydrocarbons during smoking of cigarettes [Jenkins et al. (1936)]. Yet it is possible that the spraying of tobacco with menthol affects the burning characteristics of a cigarette and thus changes the concentration of toxic and/or tumorigenic agents in the smoke.
The Hoffmanns obviously ignored what Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 527 in (4332)] wrote about the findings of Bock et al. (355) on the specific tumorigenicity of the MSS from menthol cigarettes: The results of Bock et al. [355] suggest no difference in tumorigenic activity of heptane-soluble “tar” from a mentholated cigarette compared with a plain cigarette when tested on a gram-to-gram basis.
Over the years it has been repeatedly asserted that cigarette ingredients added at normal levels to pre-1980 cigarettes or at slightly increased levels to more recent lower-“tar” cigarettes might adversely modify the chemistry and biology of the MSSs from such cigarettes. However, despite these repeated assertions, no chemical or biological evidence has been presented by those authorities making such assertions in support of their assertions. Table XXIV-3 summarizes many of the chemical and biological studies conducted since 1994 on the effect of tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1102
11/13/08 5:55:09 PM
1103
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
Table XXIV-3 A Summary of Tobacco Ingredient Studies Conducted from 1997 to Date
Analysis
Date
Number of Ingredients Studied
Detailed literature survey of ingredients added to U.S. tobacco products
1994
599
It was concluded that there was no evidence that any ingredient added to commercial cigarette tobacco produces harmful effects under the conditions of use in cigarettes.
Doull et al. (1073)
Effect of added tobacco ingredients on cigarette MSS chemistry
2002
333
Carmines (603); Rustemeier et al. (3370)
2002
482
2004
450
The smoke chemistry data revealed changes towards both higher and lower amounts of various smoke constituents…This suggests that the addition of 333 commonly used ingredients to cigarettes in three groups did not add to the toxicity of the smoke, even at the exaggerated levels tested… An overall assessment of our data suggests that these ingredients, when added to the tobacco, do not add to the toxicity of smoke, even at the elevated levels used in this series of studies. In most cases, the flavour mixtures had no statistically significant effect on the smoke yields relative to the control cigarette. In a few cases, the small increases or decreases were observed for some analytes relative to the control cigarette. The smoke yields of the experimental cigarettes were well within the ranges observed in the three reference cigarettes. The significances of differences between the test and control cigarettes were determined using both the variability of the data on the specific occasion of the measurement, and also taking into account the long-term variability of the analytical measurements over the one-year period in which analyses were determined in the present study. This long-term variability was determined by measuring the levels of the 44 “Hoffmann analytes” in a reference cigarette MSS on many occasions over the one-year period of this study. The effects of 450 tobacco ingredients (many were individual compounds listed in Tables XXIV-IA and IB) added to tobacco as seven different mixtures on the yields of 44 “Hoffmann analytes” in cigarette MSS were determined. In most cases, the flavoring ingredient mixtures had no significantly statistical effect on the MSS “Hoffmann analyte” yields vs. those from the control cigarette. Occasionally, with some mixtures, differences would be observed in some “Hoffmann analyte” yields. The effects of 29 casing ingredients and three humectants added to tobacco as eight different mixtures on the yields of 44 “Hoffmann analytes” were determined. Many of the ingredient mixtures had no statistically significant effect on the MSS “Hoffmann analyte” yields vs. those from the control cigarette. An increase in one “Hoffmann analyte”, formaldehyde, was reported when the ingredient mixture contained sugar.
2004
32
Reported Findings/ Conclusions
Reference
Baker and Smith (24A01)
Baker et al. (174b)
Baker et al. (174c)
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1103
11/13/08 5:55:09 PM
1104
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXIV-3 (CONTINUED) A Summary of Tobacco Ingredient Studies Conducted from 1997 to Date
Analysis
Date
Number of Ingredients Studied
1997, 2002
≈152
2002
333
2002
482
1997, 2002
2 (glycerol, propylene glycol)
1997
1 (menthol)
1998
170
2002
333
c) MSS CSC and skin painting
1999
150
Pyrolysis of tobacco ingredients under conditions simulating those in the cigarette burning zone
2002/2004
291
Effect of added tobacco ingredients on cigarette MSS biology: a) in vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity
b) MSS smoke inhalation
Reported Findings/ Conclusions
Although the mutagenic activities appeared to be similar, there were statistically significant differences in mutagenic activities among the samples. [The differences were primarily due to the increase in mutagenicity of the CSC when the humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol) were not added to the cigarette tobacco and thus were not present as diluents in the CSC]. Within the sensitivity and specificity of the test systems, the in vitro mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of the cigarette smoke were not increased by the addition of the ingredients. The data has been analyzed and demonstrates no additional activity from the flavored cigarettes above that of the control products. It was concluded that addition of the tested humectants singly or in combination had no meaningful effect on the site, extent or frequency of respiratory tract changes associated with smoke exposure in rats. The results of this 13-week inhalation study indicated that the addition of 5000 ppm menthol to tobacco had no substantial effect on the character or extent of the biological responses normally associated with inhalation of mainstream cigarette smoke in rats. The results indicate that the addition of flavoring ingredients to cigarette tobacco had no discernible effect on the character or extent of the biologic responses normally associated with inhalation of mainstream cigarette smoke in rats. The data indicate that the addition of these 333 commonly used ingredients, added to cigarette in three groups, did not increase the inhalation toxicity of the smoke, even at the exaggerated levels used. While tumor incidence, latency and multiplicity data occasionally differed between test and comparative reference CSC groups, all effects appeared to be within normal variation for the model system. Furthermore, none of the changes appeared to be substantial enough to conclude that the tumor promotion capacity of CSC obtained from cigarettes containing ingredients was discernibly different from the CSC obtained from reference cigarettes containing tobacco processed without ingredients. The results are compatible with parallel studies in which the ingredients are added to tobacco and the effect on cigarette smoke constituents are measured. In general, the number of “Hoffmann analytes” detected among the pyrolysis products of the ingredients, and their levels, are low…Of the 291 tobacco ingredients pyrolyzed, almost a third transfer out of the pyrolysis zone intact, and almost two thirds transfer at least 95% intact.
Reference
Bioresearch [for RJRT] (24A02); Rodgman (3263, 3264)
Carmines (603); Roemer et al. (24A11)
Massey et al. (24A09)
Heck et al. (24A06)
Gaworski et al. (24A03)
Gaworski et al. (24A04)
Carmines (603) ; Vanscheeuwijck et al. (24A12) Gaworski et al. (24A05)
Baker and Bishop (172a)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1104
11/13/08 5:55:10 PM
1105
Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients
Table XXIV-3 (CONTINUED) A Summary of Tobacco Ingredient Studies Conducted from 1997 to Date
Analysis
Date
Number of Ingredients Studied
2003
2004
482
2004
1 (glycerol)
2005
159 non-volatile and complex ingredients (these ingredients were not individual compounds)
2006
1(sugar)
Reported Findings/ Conclusions
A review of the pre-2003 studies on the effect of added ingredients on the chemical and biological properties of cigarette MSS with emphasis on the yields of the “Hoffmann analytes.” Their discussion included various published (603, 1053, 3263, 3264, 3266, 24A03, 24A04, 24A05, 24A06) and prepublished (172a, 174a, 174b, 3314a, 3370, 24A09, 24A11, 24A12) manuscripts on tobacco ingredients. This publication summarized the reported findings on the 482 tobacco ingredients studied by Baker et al. (174b, 174c). The major conclusion: Many of the added tobacco ingredient mixtures produced no significant effect on the yields of many of the “Hoffmann analytes” in the cigarette MSS. In a series of three biological studies on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, the response due to MSS exposure was not distinguishable between the ingredient-treated cigarette and the control. A study to determine the effect of different levels of added glycerol on cigarette MSS yields: The glycerol transfer was proportional to that added to the tobacco blend. With a system simulating cigarette combustion conditions, pyrolysis of many of the non-volatile ingredients gave no “Hoffmann analytes.” When occasionally formed, the “Hoffmann analytes” included phenols, benzene, toluene, and styrene. Biologically-active furfural, never listed as a significant biologically-active smoke component by Hoffmann and his colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808), was occasionally formed. This study was an extension of the previously reported effect (174c) of sugar ingredients on the MSS yield of formaldehyde.
Reference
Baker and Smith (174e)
Baker et al. (174a)
Liu (2380)
Baker and Bishop (172b)
Baker et al. (172c)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1105
11/13/08 5:55:10 PM
1106
ingredients on the chemical and biological properties of the MSS from cigarette containing a particular added ingredient or ingredient mixture. Many of the scientific criteria suggested by the Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO) personnel (24A08) are incorporated in the tabulated investigations. It is interesting that the LSRO in its 2004 monograph [see p. 50 in (24A08)] wrote about the Doull et al. list of 460 individual compounds: “However, the fate of very few of these chemicals has been studied in cigarettes.” This statement was made about the “very few” chemicals despite the listing by LSRO [see pp. 45–46 in 24A08)] of the studies by Baker et al. (174b, 174c), Massey et al. (24A09), and Baker and Smith (24A01) on 482 ingredients, the studies by Gaworski et al. (24A03, 24A04, 24A05) and Heck et al. (24A06) on over 170 ingredients, the studies by Carmines (603), Roemer et al. (24A11), Rustemeier et al. (3370), and Vanscheeuwijck et al. (24A12) on 333 ingredients. In the latter studies (603, 3370, 24A11, 24A12), over 210 of the 333 ingredients (63%) were listed by Doull et al. as individual tobacco ingredients. Can more than 210 vs. 333 be considered “very few” agents in the smoke? LSRO is probably correct in its assessment of the number of individual components with a precise fate study but examination and understanding of the pyrolysis data and effect of many of them on MSS chemical and biological properties provide much significant data on
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
their behavior in a smoked cigarette. To date, there is much more known on the effect of added tobacco ingredients on MSS properties than there is on the effect of foodstuff additives on the properties of cooked foodstuffs. Despite the wealth of information now available from the studies outlined in Table XXIV-3 that indicate that the ingredients—whether tobacco compounds or nontobacco compounds—added to cigarette tobacco do not significantly alter the MSS chemical or biological properties, none of the critics of tobacco ingredients has challenged the scientific findings presented in the publications listed, provided any contradictory scientific data, or suggested any additional definitive studies. This raises the question: Is this oft-repeated assertion about the deleterious effect of added tobacco ingredients like the many other anti-tobacco-smoking assertions that have no supporting data or for which contradictory data or equivocal data have been generated [see Table 1 in Rodgman et al. (3307)]?
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors are extremely grateful to the late Richard R. Baker for his meaningful contributions to several sections of this chapter that were included in part in previous ingredient publications.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C024.indd 1106
11/13/08 5:55:10 PM
25
Pyrolysis
For many years, the fate during smoking of a compound added to cigarette tobacco was defined by its fate during pyrolysis as an individually pyrolyzed compound. The stimulus for this assertion was twofold: (1) many publications were available that indicated the pyrolysis of a large number of compounds—from relatively low molecular weight ones, such as acetylene, to much higher molecular weight ones, such as the sterols—yielded tumorigenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); (2) the ingredients to improve the smoking quality of a cigarette were added at such a low level that analytical data on their effect on smoke composition was almost impossible to generate. Because of this analytical problem with additives to the cigarette filler, many investigators utilized pyrolysis of individual tobacco components or additives in an attempt to define the spectrum of products and their influence on tobacco smoke composition and properties. The assertion of the equivalence of the fate of a compound on pyrolysis vs. its fate in a cigarette tobacco filler during smoking persisted for over twenty years after the mid-1950s. As proponents of this equivalence, Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 346–347 in (4332)] wrote: Most pyrolysis studies with tobacco, tobacco extracts, extract fractions, individual components, and tobacco additives are performed in a nitrogen atmosphere. This procedure has often been criticized on the grounds that many of the toxic constituents formed during smoking of tobacco products occur as a result of combustion in air rather than in a nitrogen atmosphere. This criticism, however, cannot be maintained in view of studies by Newsome and Keith (2780) which demonstrated that a reducing rather than an oxidizing atmosphere exists at the cone region of a burning cigarette.
Consideration of the effect of pyrolysis and the cigarette smoking process reveals the following: in both cases, a given compound may undergo a variety of reactions. In the case of pyrolysis, fragments produced from the compound during pyrolysis only have the opportunity to react with the unchanged compound itself or with each other. In the case of a smoked cigarette, the compound, either inherent in tobacco or added, generates fragments during the smoking process which have the opportunity not only to react with intact volatilized tobacco components (over 5300 of which have been identified) but also to react with the reaction fragments produced from them. If it is assumed that a given compound X during pyrolysis is not only transferred in part to the pyrolysate but also yields three pyrosynthetic fragments (A, B, and C), then these four entities (X, A, B, and C) may transfer to the pyrolysate intact or interact in a variety of ways to form a mixture of pyrolysate components.
entities interact with one another
X
X + A + B + C
pyrolysate plus transfer of intact X
If it is assumed not only that the same type of reaction occurs in a cigarette during the smoking process in the case of compound X, either added (Xa) to or inherent (X) in the tobacco blend, but also that similar degradation reactions occur with the other tobacco components (X1, X2, X3, … Xn) the situation described in the following equations could exist, where n could be as high as or higher than 5300, the approximate number of identified tobacco components. In the study of the addition of compound X to a cigarette tobacco filler, the added compound is designated as Xa. The inherent tobacco compound X and its fragments A, B, and C plus the added compound Xa and its fragments Aa, Ba , and Ca have the opportunity not only to react with each other but also to interact with X1, X2, X3, … Xn, A1, A2, A3, … An, B1, B2, B3, … Bn, and C1, C2, C3, … Cn, the fragments from hundreds of other tobacco components. In both the pyrolysis case and the cigarette smoke formation case, the number of fragments may, of course, be many more than the three designated as A, B, and C. X + A + B + C X Xa Xa + Aa + Ba + Ca X1 X1 + A1 + B1 + C1 X2 X2 + A2 + B2 + C2 X3 X3 + A3 + B3 + C3 … . . . . . … . . . . . … . . . . . Xn Xn + An + Bn + Cn
entities interact with one another cigarette smoke plus transfer of intact X and Xa, as well as intact X1, X2, X3,...Xn
Obviously, pyrolysis of an individual compound (X) at a specific temperature and during the smoking process in a machine-smoked cigarette whose blend contains inherent compound X and added compound Xa, are entirely different situations and will yield qualitative and quantitative differences between the compositions of the pyrolysates and the cigarette smoke. Qualitatively there may be some similarities in the two compositions. Quantitatively, the probability of any similarity is extremely low. It should be noted that during the pyrolysis of compound X, a specific temperature such as 700°C or 600°C is usually maintained. During the smoking process occurring in the compound X- and (X + Xa)containing cigarette, compound X and Xa and their pyrogenetically generated fragments are exposed to a range of temperatures varying from nearly 1000°C at the fire cone to 1107
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1107
11/13/08 5:56:13 PM
1108
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
50 to 60°C near the butt. In addition, Britt et al. (435) noted that the residence time during most pyrolysis studies of tobacco components was much longer than that encountered by the tobacco components during the smoking process. The reactions depicted above in pyrolysis of a component vs. those in the cigarette smoking process with a component added to the tobacco exist despite the assertion that the pyrolysis procedure has been specifically designed to simulate the smoking process (172b, 1648, 3616). In 1979, Schmeltz et al. (3512) reported on the fate of radiolabeled nicotine during pyrolysis and its fate during actual smoking of a cigarette containing the radiolabel nicotine reveals at least two of the co-authors (Hoffmann and Schmeltz) had changed their long-held view on the supposed equivalence of compound behavior during pyrolysis and actual smoking. Schmeltz et al. wrote: Products obtained from the thermal degradation of [14C] nicotine in a combustion tube (under pyrolytic conditions) and in a cigarette (undergoing machine smoking) were examined by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC), by GLCmass spectrometry, and by radiochromatography. Under pyrolytic conditions in a combustion tube, nicotine underwent extensive degradation to pyridines, quinoline, arylnitriles, and aromatic hydrocarbons. In contrast, in a burning cigarette, a substantial portion of nicotine remained intact (≈41%), 12.5% underwent oxidation to CO2, up to 11% was degraded to volatile pyridine bases, and negligible amounts were converted to neutral or acidic particulate components. A major portion of nicotine and its degradation products was also diverted to sidestream smoke. These results suggest to us that pyrolysis experiments may be limited for establishing the fate of nicotine and possibly other tobacco components in a burning cigarette.
On the basis of numerous pyrolysis studies, it has been postulated that a number of tobacco leaf components are the major precursors of components in tobacco smoke. Throughout this chapter, smoke components alleged by some investigators to play a role in the smoking-health issue have
been emphasized, particularly those smoke components supposedly involved in the causation of lung cancer or other respiratory tract disorders. Carbon monoxide and nicotine have been proposed as cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) components involved in cardiovascular problems. Nicotine occurs in cigarette smoke as a result of its transfer from the cut tobacco leaf where it is considered to be present in the so-called “bound” form as a variety of nicotine salts with organic acids (citric, malic, oxalic, palmitic, stearic, etc.). As noted by Perfetti (2918a, 25A47), these nicotine salts may have various structures, depending on the nature of the acid, for example, the molar ratio of acid to nicotine may be 3:1, 2:1, or 1:1. During the cigarette smoking process, these salts, depending on their composition, are considered to decompose to yield products ranging from mainly nicotine plus the acid in the salt to traces of nicotine plus various nicotine reaction and degradation products plus the acid. It has been proposed that the nicotine in the smoke again “binds” with acidic components of the smoke and is considered to be present primarily in the mainstream particulate phase as “bound” nicotine, but the binding in cigarette MSS is different from that in the tobacco. In cigarette smoke, the “binding” or salt formation is considered to be primarily with the stronger aliphatic organic acids such as formic, acetic, etc., whose levels in smoke are substantial compared to those of palmitic acid, stearic acid, etc. Table XXV-1, modified and updated from similar tables by Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) and Baker (171a), summarizes the major precursor relationships proposed and/or demonstrated for tobacco leaf components and tobacco smoke components. These proposals are based in part on the results of numerous pyrolysis studies. In some cases, the validation of the proposals is based on results obtained by addition of leaf components to tobacco and assessing the effect on the yields of specific MSS components when the “spiked” tobacco is smoked as a cigarette. As noted previously, equivalence of the reaction mechanisms involved in pyrolysis and those involved in the tobacco smoking process was debated for many years, with the current
Table XXV-1 Precursor Relationships between Tobacco Leaf Components and Tobacco Smoke Components Smoke Component
Leaf Component
References
Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benzene, toluene, xylenes, etc.
tobacco extracts paraffin hydrocarbons aliphatic acids sugars amino acids
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Naphthalenes, anthracenes,
solanesol
Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3465, 3466), Schlotzhauer et al. (3456) Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466) Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466) Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466) Patterson et al. (2902), Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466), Higman et al. (1647) Severson et al. (3616), Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1108
11/13/08 5:56:14 PM
1109
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-1 (Continued) Precursor Relationships between Tobacco Leaf Components and Tobacco Smoke Components Smoke Component phenanthrenes, pyrenes, chrysenes, fluoranthenes, benzopyrenes, etc.
Leaf Component terpenes tobacco extracts
paraffin hydrocarbons
polysaccharides (pectin, cellulose, starch)
phytosterols
long-chained esters amino acids sugars Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (cont.)
triglycerides
Phenols Phenol, cresols, xylenols, dihydroxybenzenes, etc.
lignin
sugars polysaccharides (cellulose, pectin, starch) protein amino acids tobacco extracts extracted tobacco
chlorogenic acid Aldehydes and Ketones Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, acetone, α,β-dicarbonyls, quinolines, carbolines, etc.
sugars
polysaccharides (cellulose, pectin)
triglycerides glycerol
References Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466), Severson et al. (3616) Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291), Rodgman (3246), Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3465), Schlotzhauer et al. (3466), Severson et al. (3615, 3616) Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291), Rodgman (3246), Lam (2255, 2257), Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466), Severson et al. (3616) Wright (4281), Gilbert and Lindsey (1289), Higman et al. (1647) Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291), Wynder et al. (4355), Rodgman (3246), Severson et al. (3616), Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466) Severson et al. (3616) Patterson et al. (2902); Higman et al. (1647) Gilbert and Lindsey (1289), Higman et al. (1647) Rodgman and Cook (3269) Rodgman and Mims (3305), Schlotzhauer et al. (3468), Higman et al. (1647), Schlotzhauer et al. (3466) Bell et al. (246), Spears et al. (3767), Higman et al. (1647), Schlotzhauer et al. (3466) Higman et al. (1647) Higman et al. (1647) Schlotzhauer et al. (3466) Rodgman and Cook (3277), Rodgman and Mims (3305), Severson et al. (3616) Schlotzhauer et al. (3462) Gager et al. (1264, 1265), Houminer and Patai (1835d), Johnson et al. (1960), Higman et al. (1647) Zamorani et al. (4398d), Fredrickson (1228), Fredrickson et al. (1238) Kitamura (2111a) Doihara et al. (1023, 1024), Kröller (2192, 2196)
Hydrogen Cyanide amino acids
Patterson et al. (2902, 2905), Higman et al. (1647), Johnson et al. (1967) (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1109
11/13/08 5:56:15 PM
1110
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-1 (Continued) Precursor Relationships between Tobacco Leaf Components and Tobacco Smoke Components Smoke Component Aliphatic Nitrogen Compounds Aliphatic amines, volatile N-nitrosamines
Leaf Component
amino acids protein nicotine nicotine + nitrate
References
Smith et al. (3729) Higman et al. (1647) Kaburaki et al. (2006), Schmeltz et al. (3512) Tso et al. (3985), Hecht et al. (1564), Hoffmann et al. (1696)
Monocyclic Nitrogen Compounds amino acids Anilines, pyrazines, pyridines, pyrroles, tobacco-specific N- nitrosamines, etc.
amino acids + sugars protein nicotine
Polycyclic Nitrogen Compounds Indoles, carbazoles, acridines, quinolines, carbolines, etc.
nicotine
amino acids
protein N-Heterocyclic Amines Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, IQ, AaC, MeAaC, etc.
amino acids
protein
Patterson et al. (2902), Higman et al. (1647) Green et al. (1369) Higman et al. (1647), Schmeltz et al. (3499) Schmeltz et al. (3512) Van Duuren et al. (4027), Kaburaki et al. (2006), Schmeltz et al. (3512) Patterson et al. (2902), Higman et al. (1647), Yamamoto et al. (4365a), Sugimura (3828c) Higman et al. (1647) Chortyk et al. (726), Patterson et al. (2902), Akimoto (25A01), Dong et al. (1041), Sugimura et al.(3829a), Kosuga et al. (2178a), Sugimura (3828a, 3828b), Takeda et al. (3863a, 25A73), Yasuda et al. (4382a), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4387a, 4387b, 4388), Yamazoe et al. (4370a), Conner and Dominguez (25A17), Coleman and Perfetti (25A14), Coleman et al. (25A15) Yoshida et al. (4389A, 4390)
Sulfur-Containing Compounds
Acids, Aliphatic Formic to nonanoic Acids, Aliphatic Decanoic and higher
sulfur-containing amino acids
Fujimaki et al. (25A23), Kato et al. (2048, 2049), Smith et al. (3729)
esters of mono- and disaccharides and aliphatic and terpenoid alcohols
Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)
esters of phytosterols, aliphatic alcohols, and terpenoid alcohols
Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), Severson et al. (3616)
lignin
Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)
Acids, Aromatic
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1110
11/13/08 5:56:15 PM
1111
Pyrolysis
consensus being that these processes are not equivalent. Also included are the results of research in the mid-1950s on the major tobacco and cigarette paper component, cellulose, either smoked in cigarette configuration [Fredrickson (1228), Fredrickson et al. (1238)] or burned or pyrolyzed in bulk. When the primary focus of the early research was on the pyrogenesis of PAHs, Wright (4281) demonstrated that the amount of benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) generated during bulk burning or bulk pyrolysis of cellulose was much greater than that generated during the burning of the cellulose (cigarette paper) in a cylindrical form, simulating its configuration in the cigarette.
XXV.A Individual Tobacco Types In the early 1930s, Roffo (3320, 25A50, 25A51, 25A52) reported the production of skin tumors in laboratory animals by the repeated application of a “tar” obtained by the “destructive distillation” of tobacco. This “destructive distillate” from tobacco, as noted by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), is in no way comparable to the smoke condensate generated from cigarettes during a smoking procedure simulating that used by the human smoker in terms of puff duration, puff frequency, and puff volume. Despite the fact that the puff volume, puff duration, and puff frequency were usually set at 35 ml, 2 sec, and 1 puff/min, respectively, after the 1937 publication by Bradford et al. (1937) on human smoking parameters, Wynder et al. (1953a, 1953b) elected to use a puff frequency of 3 puff/min for the generation of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) for their mouse skin-painting studies, despite their assertion that the smoking regime simulated that of the human smoker. In addition, the destructive distillation procedure used by Roffo is not comparable to the pyrolysis procedures used several decades later by other investigators, for example, Lam (2255, 2257) and Wynder et al. (4355). Roffo’s work is presented here for the sake of historical completeness. In later reports, Roffo (3323, 3325) and his son (3316, 3318) claimed the identification of B[a]P in the destructive distillate of tobacco, but these claims were subsequently challenged by Wynder et al. (4306a) who noted: Roffo … claimed to have identified benzpyrene in tobacco tar, but this could not be confirmed by Hirst and his coworkers (813), and more recently that substance could not be detected by Waller (25A81). An examination by Eby (25A21) of the tobacco tar used in this study [the mouse skin-painting study by Wynder, Graham, and Croninger (4306a)] did not reveal any spectroscopic evidence of the known carcinogenic hydrocarbons.
Roffo (25A60) also claimed that the biological results in his painting results with the effect on the levels of “destructive distillate” from tobacco were the same no matter which type of tobacco was subjected to his destructive distillation process. That his destructive distillation was not comparable to the actual cigarette smoking process was demonstrated
in later studies by Wynder and Hoffmann (4317, 4332), who reported that the different types of tobacco (flue-cured, burley, Maryland, and Oriental) generated CSCs whose specific tumorigenicities were different, as were their contents of B[a] P and phenol. The specific tumorigenicities and phenol levels per milligram of CSC were found to be in the sequence
flue-cured = Oriental > Maryland > burley
whereas the B[a]P levels per milligram of condensate were found to be in the sequence
flue-cured > Oriental > Maryland > burley.
More recent confirmation of the differences among tobacco types in another bioassay has been obtained with regard to the specific mutagenicities (as measured in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium) of their smoke condensates generated under standard conditions. Results of both in-house studies [Smeeton et al. (3707)] and external studies [Mizusaki et al. (2568), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388), DeMarini (933)] indicate the response of different strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the Ames test to smoke condensates from cigarettes fabricated with different tobacco types not only are dissimilar but also are in a sequence opposite that found for specific tumorigenicities determined in mouse skin-painting studies, that is, the mutagenicities based on an equivalent weight of smoke condensate were found to be in the sequence
flue-cured < Oriental < Maryland < burley.
Critical reviews of the Roffo work have been published by Wynder et al. (4306a), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), and Larson et al. (2264). All three groups asserted that the “destructive distillate” from tobacco, as prepared by Roffo, is not comparable to CSC generated under conditions more closely approximating those in the human smoking of a cigarette. Larson et al. also noted that the number of malignant tumors produced in all of the Roffo skin-painting studies with the destructive distillate from tobacco was so few (three malignant tumors, two carcinomas and one sarcoma, in nearly 1000 treated animals) as to be almost within experimental error. Over the years, pyrolysis studies with tobaccos under a variety of conditions have provided diverse results with regard to the level of B[a]P found in the pyrolysate, for example, Kröller (2196), Green and Best (1357), and Severson et al. (3616). The phenol:B[a]P ratios were also much compared in pyrolysates and MSSs and they too provided diverse results, for example, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (3190). Adams et al. (31) used catechol rather than phenol as an “indicator” for phenols and provided MSS and SSS B[a]P and catechol data on four different types of commercial cigarettes. From these data, the calculated catechol:B[a]P ratios for the combined MSS and SSS were widespread, ranging from 1074:1 to 2680:1. The data reported by Severson et al. on the yields of phenol and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1111
11/13/08 5:56:16 PM
1112
benzopyrenes in the pyrolysates (and the ratios derivable from their data) demonstrated that the process involved in the generation of a tobacco pyrolysate is not comparable to the process involved in the generation of CSC from cigarettes made with the same tobacco and smoked under conditions simulating the human smoking process.
XXV.B Extracts from Tobacco The 1953 report of the successful production of carcinomas in mice repeatedly painted for their life span with daily doses of CSC generated by a smoking process supposedly simulating that used by human cigarette smokers [Wynder et al. (4306a)] led to a search for the smoke component(s) responsible for the biological response. No carcinogenic, cocarcinogenic, or promoting compound identified in CSC, when considered at its concentration in CSC, can explain the biological response obtained in mouse skin-painting studies nor can it be explained when the carcinogenic, cocarcinogenic, and promoting components at their CSC concentrations are considered to be acting in concert. The finding in 1913 by Staudinger et al. (25A68) that pyrolysis of isoprene yielded a “tar” was utilized a decade later by Kennaway (2073–2076). He reported that heating organic compounds (acetylene, isoprene, cholesterol, foodstuffs) at high temperatures (in air or an inert atmosphere) yielded “tars” or “pyrolysates” which were tumorigenic to the skin of laboratory animals. After the discoveries of the tumorigenicity of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) and B[a]P, many such generated pyrolysates were shown to contain various tumorigenic PAHs [Rodgman (3233, 25A48)]. In the early 1950s, a controversy arose about the presence of such PAHs in CSC, a material generated by the exposure of tobacco—a mixture of many organic compounds—to temperatures ranging from slightly above ambient to over 900°C. By the late 1950s, this controversy was resolved by the identification in CSC of a variety of PAHs, including several [B[a]P, chrysene, benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A), 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMB[a]A), DB[a,h]A] reported to give positive responses in skin-painted laboratory animals, albeit at dose levels far in excess of their levels in CSC. Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) reviewed much of the early research on the identification of PAHs in CSC. Demonstration that PAHs were present in CSC then led to research on their source(s). Cigarette paper [Wright (4281)], the lighting source (matches, flammable organic solventcharged cigarette lighters), and PAHs in environmental pollutants to which tobacco might be exposed during growth, harvesting, and transportation [Campbell and Lindsey (583), Lyons (2426), Bentley and Burgan (285)] were eliminated as sources or precursors of PAHs in cigarette smoke. Extensive research subsequently determined that tobacco itself and/or its components were precursors of the PAHs in CSC. As noted previously, in the 1930s, Roffo (3320, 25A50) claimed the production of malignant tumors in laboratory animals skin painted with a “destructive distillate” from tobacco. Roffo (3323, 3325) and his son [Roffo (3316, 3318)] also
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
claimed identification of a benzopyrene or a “benzopyrenelike” substance in the distillate. Subsequently, Roffo reported that organic-solvent extraction of tobacco yielded an organic solvent-insoluble tobacco residue whose “destructive distillate” was less tumorigenic in skin-painting studies than the “destructive distillate” prepared from the unextracted (control) tobacco (3327). Roffo postulated that the major tobacco precursor of the “distillate” component responsible for the tumorigenicity observed in laboratory animals was the phytosterols. Coincident with general acceptance of biologically active PAHs in CSC were extensive pyrolysis studies not only on organic solvent-extractable materials from tobacco but also individual components and classes of components in the solvent-extracted materials. The organic solvent (pentane, hexane, heptane, petroleum ether) used as extractant removed wax-like organic components from the tobacco. These waxy materials comprised several series of long-chained saturated (1308, 3807) and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (3247, 3345) and alcohols (812, 3276), phytosterols and their longchained fatty acid esters (3247), terpenoid alcohols such as solanesol (3344, 3359) and the duvanediols (3195, 3220, 3221, 3283, 3351, 3361), solanesyl esters with long-chained fatty acids (3296, 3358, 3616), and a series of esters of longchained alcohols and long-chained fatty acids (3294). Contradictory results were obtained on the yields of the allegedly tumorigenic PAHs and the biological properties of the CSCs from cigarettes fabricated from organic solventextracted tobaccos. With relatively nonpolar solvents such as pentane, hexane, and heptane, from 5% to 10% of the tobacco weight was removed by extraction with these solvents. Reductions in per cigarette PAH yields were reported for the MSSs from solvent-extracted tobaccos by numerous investigators, for example, Campbell and Lindsey (583), Neukomm and Bonnet (2716), Rodgman (3241–3243, 3246, 3251), and Wynder and his co-workers [Wynder (4294), Wright (4282), Wynder et al. (4355), Wynder and Hoffmann (4307, 4309)] on solvent extractions of tobaccos and their effect on the PAH yields in the CSC. Initially, the reductions in the MSS yields of the PAHs, particularly those with four or more fused rings, were reported as being significant when considered on a per cigarette yield basis. Subsequently, the same investigators (Wynder and colleagues) claimed that the reductions in PAH yields should be viewed as only marginal when the PAH yields were considered on a per gram of CSC basis. The percent reduction in tumorigenicity (expressed as % tumor-bearing animals [TBA] in skin-painting experiments) of the mainstream CSCs from cigarettes fabricated with solvent-extracted tobaccos was usually less than the percent reduction in the levels of PAHs (with B[a]P, expressed in micrograms per gram or nanograms per gram of CSC, used as an “indicator” for the levels of PAHs with four or more fused rings). It was obvious from data already in the literature describing tobacco smoke and tobacco pyrolysate compositions that B[a]P was not a valid “indicator” for the tetracyclic and higher PAHs demonstrated to be tumorigenic to mouse skin.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1112
11/13/08 5:56:17 PM
1113
Pyrolysis
American investigators [Rayburn and Wartman (3091), Rayburn et al. (3092)] as well as French investigators [Cuzin et al. (885)] reported slight to no reductions in the levels of mainstream CSC PAHs, particularly B[a]P, as a result of organic solvent-extraction of tobacco. Much of the early research on organic solvent extraction of tobacco to reduce the yields of PAHs in mainstream CSCs was reviewed by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) and Hoffmann and Wynder (1798). Organic-solvent extraction of tobacco to control PAH levels in MSS fell from grace around 1960 when it was described by its early proponents, Wynder and Hoffmann (4309), as a process “impractical both technically and economically” and later was classified as “only of academic interest” by Wynder and Hecht (4306d), a view reported by the U.S. Surgeon General [see Table 26, p. 14: 114 in (4005)]. Pyrolysis studies have been conducted not only on the material extracted from the tobacco but also on the unextracted (control) tobaccos and the residual extracted tobaccos in attempts to define the precursor(s) of PAHs (and phenols) in cigarette MSS. In some respects, the differences between the compositions of the pyrolysates from solvent-extracted tobacco and from unextracted tobacco paralleled the differences between the compositions of the MSSs from cigarettes fabricated with solvent-extracted tobacco and with unextracted tobacco. In 1958, Wynder et al. (4355) described the effect of varying the pyrolysis temperature on the yield of pyrolysate from an n-hexane extract from tobacco. The extracted material constituted 5.4% of the original tobacco weight and consisted of long-chained saturated and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, glycerides and other esters, solanesol and phytosterols and their esters, long-chained aliphatic esters, and α-tocopherol. Major findings from their study included (see also Table XXV-2): The pyrolysate yields varied inversely as the pyrolysis temperature, that is, the pyrolysate yield decreased as the temperature of pyrolysis was increased. Presumably, this is due to less decomposition of the extracted components to vapor-phase components
(water, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, etc.) at the lower pyrolysis temperatures. The percent conversion of the extracted components to PAHs decreased as the pyrolysis temperature decreased. The specific tumorigenicities of the pyrolysates, applied as 1% and 5% solutions in acetone in skin-painting studies involving both mice and rabbits, decreased as the pyrolysis temperature was lowered. Pyrolysis of the extract in either an inert atmosphere (nitrogen) or an oxygenated atmosphere (air) at 880°C did not markedly affect the findings with respect to the yield of pyrolysate, the generation of PAHs, or the specific tumorigenicity (mouse skinpainting bioassay) obtained with a solution of 1% pyrolysate in acetone. Studies on organic-solvent extraction of tobacco conducted from the mid- to-late 1950s by Rodgman (3241, 3242, 3246, 3251), Ashburn (116, 117), and Ashburn and Rodgman (121) provided analytical data on the PAHs in mainstream CSC that in some ways paralleled the findings reported by Wynder (4294). Rodgman (3251) summarized the RJRT R&D findings: Organic-solvent extraction of various tobacco types (fluecured, burley, Oriental) and blends reduced the yields of both total and individual PAHs, e.g., B[a]P in mainstream CSC both on a per cigarette basis and on a weight of tobacco consumed basis. The per cigarette “tar” yields were also reduced in every instance.
Partition of the organic-solvent extractables between a solvent system consisting of a polar solvent (aqueous ethanol) and a nonpolar solvent (hexane or pentane) and returning each partition fraction separately to the organic solvent-extracted tobacco residue indicated: Addition of the nonpolar solvent-soluble material (which contained the bulk of the tobacco waxes)
Table XXV-2 Pyrolysis Studies on n-Hexane Extract from Tobacco Pyrolysis Conditions
a
Temp. °C
Medium
Pyrolysate, % of Extract
Tumorigenic PAHs
560 640 720 800 880
N2 N2 N2 N2 N2
50 35 32 28 28
present
880
air
30
Tumorigenicity Studies, % Tumor-Bearing Animalsa Painted with Pyrolysate 1% Solution
5% Solution 0 17 60 97
present
0 0 0 60 77
present
67
67
% Tumor-bearing animals (mice) with carcinoma at skin-painted site; similar percentages were found with skin-painted rabbits
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1113
11/13/08 5:56:18 PM
1114
to the extracted tobacco residue returned the CSC PAH yield almost to that of the CSC from the unextracted (control) tobacco. Addition of the polar solvent-soluble material (which consisted primarily of oxygen- and/or nitrogencontaining flavor-contributing tobacco components) to the extracted tobacco produced very little change in the PAH (both total and individual) level of the CSC. These results were interpreted as an indication that the relatively high molecular weight, nonvolatile tobacco wax components were the major precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in smoke, whereas the moderate to low molecular weight and volatile flavorful components in tobacco did not contribute significantly to the PAH levels in smoke. Addition of the organic solvent-soluble tobacco components, for example, long-chained aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction, solanesol, or β-sitosterol, to unextracted (control) tobacco increased the levels of the total and some individual PAHs in the CSC. Thus, removal of tobacco wax components reduced the levels of both the total and individual PAHs in CSC, whereas addition of tobacco wax components increased the levels of both the total and individual PAHs in CSC (3251, 3269). Examination of the relationship of the level of B[a]P to that of other individual PAHs in the various CSCs from the solventextracted tobaccos or from the component-“spiked” tobaccos confirmed what was already obvious from other literature data: B[a]P is not a valid “indicator” for either total PAHs or other individual PAHs with fewer than four fused rings, with four fused rings, or with more than four fused rings. From the mid-1960s to the early 1970s, the USDA group described the pyrolysis of organic-solvent extractables from tobacco. In the earlier studies, the pertinence of the pyrolysis results in defining the precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in the CSC was emphasized (3465, 3455), but subsequent research dealt with the precursors in tobacco of the simple phenols in cigarette smoke (3456, 3468). In 1968, Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3465) noted that hexane extractables from tobacco constituted about 6% of the original tobacco weight, whereas the extracted tobacco residue constituted about 94% of the original tobacco weight. Pyrolysis of the hexane extractables and the extracted tobacco residue indicated that, of the total B[a]P determined in these two pyrolysates, about 60% was found in the hexane extractables pyrolysate (6% of the original tobacco) and 40% in the pyrolysate of the extracted tobacco residue (94% of the original tobacco). Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466) also demonstrated by pyrolysis of individual components isolated from the hexane extract that the following were precursors of the PAHs in the pyrolysates: n-dotriacontane, stearic acid and linoleic acid, phytol, squalene, and β-sitosterol. In 1973, Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) reviewed the pyrogenesis of tobacco smoke components. They discussed the extraction/pyrolysis results described above plus results of their studies on the pyrolysis (800°C) of fractions sequentially extracted from tobacco with a series of increasingly
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
polar solvents (hexane, acetone, ethanol, water) (3458). Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) noted: The sources of about 70% of the aromatic hydrocarbons ranging from benzene to BaP, in the pyrolysates, were due to leaf components extractable with hexane and acetone: these extracts amounted to less than 25% of dry leaf weight. The hexane extractables (7.2% of leaf weight) accounted for 33% of the neutral products. The hexane-soluble material of cured leaf tobacco is known to include aliphatic and cyclic paraffins, fatty acids, phytosterols, steryl esters, and terpenes, all preferred precursors of aromatic hydrocarbons. The acetone extract (17.5% of leaf weight) contributed another 35% of aromatic hydrocarbons to the pyrolysate, indicating a further extraction of similar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons precursors. Together, these two extracts contributed 86% of the BaP content of the tobacco pyrolysate. The disproportionate contribution of these fractions to BaP formation becomes apparent from the following data: the hexane and acetone fractions, containing hydrocarbons and lipids, yielded about 700 mg BaP per gram of material pyrolyzed, while the residual tobacco, consisting mostly of cellulose materials, yielded less than 34 mg of BaP per gram pyrolyzed.
They also demonstrated that the major volatile phenols (phenol, cresols) were produced primarily by pyrolysis of the alcohol extractable and the final tobacco residue. These fractions accounted for 38% and 44%, respectively, of the total phenols yield. The alcohol extractables included polyphenolic tobacco pigment and low molecular weight sugars, whereas the final tobacco residue contained the polysaccharides celluloses, starch, pectins, and lignin. All these yield the simple phenols on pyrolysis or during tobacco smoking (248, 2043, 3277, 3305, 3453, 3468, 3767). In 1978, Severson et al. (3616) revisited the organicsolvent extraction of tobacco. They noted [see p. 277 in (3616)]: Numerous pyrolytic studies have shown that the hexane or petroleum ether … extract of tobacco contains the major precursors of smoke polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [Wynder et al. (4355), Schlotzhauer et al. (3468), Schlotzhauer and Chortyk (3451)]. However, many of these studies were made under conditions which produced optimum PAH yields [Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3489)]; thus, the PAH distributions were not comparable to those in [CSC] and the data obtained could not be exactly correlated with PAH production during the smoking process.
Severson et al. (3616) determined the pyrolytic conditions that gave the PAH profiles of tobacco pyrolysates that they claimed “could be correlated with [CSC] PAH profiles.” Examination of their data indicates that this claim is not valid. Severson et al. conducted two major experiments. They examined: The effect of petroleum ether extraction on the PAH levels in the pyrolysates from the petroleum ether extractables, PEE (8% of the original tobacco weight), the extracted tobacco residue, RES (92% of the original tobacco weight), and the original tobacco.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1114
11/13/08 5:56:18 PM
1115
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-3 Comparison of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Fraction Levels, Phenol Yields, and Acid Yields in 700°C Pyrolysates from Tobacco, Petroleum Ether Extractables (PEE), and the Tobacco Residue (RES) after Extraction Amount From Pyrolysate Components
Tobacco μg/1000 mg
PEE μg/80 mg
RES μg/920 mg
Total PEE + RES μg/1000 mg
% Diff., Total vs. Tobacco
PAH Group Naphthalene Fluorene Phenanthrene Pyrene Chrysene Benzopyrene
3200 1100 1600 630 180 190
3900 1100 1500 820 260 140
1300 860 780 350 80 50
5200 1960 2280 1170 340 190
63 78 43 86 89 0
Totals
6900
7720
3420
11140
61
Phenol Group Phenol o-Cresol m- + p-Cresol Ethyl-/dimethylphenols 1-Naphthol 2-Naphthol
3610 750 1620 910 160 140
50 50 50 130 30 20
2620 630 1180 700 110 110
2670 680 1230 830 140 130
26 20 24 -9 -13 -7
Totals
7190
330
5350
5680
-21
Acids Volatile acids (C1-C7) Nonvolatile acids (C11-C34)
330 12
140 11
230 4
370 15
12 25
Totals
342
151
234
385
13
The effect of chromatography of the petroleum ether extractables PEE with eight increasingly polar solvent systems, ranging from petroleum ether to an acetone:methanol solution, on the composition of each of the eight chromatographic fractions, and on the PAH levels in the pyrolysates from each of the eight fractions. Table XXV-3, adapted from (3616), indicates that, at the optimum pyrolysis conditions specified (700°C, N2), the totals of the PAH groups (except for the benzopyrene group) in the pyrolysates from the PEE and the RES are substantially higher (42% to 89%) than the levels of the same PAH groups in the pyrolysate from unextracted tobacco. Table XXV-3 also shows that the sum of the total PAHs in the pyrolysates from the two fractions was 61% greater than the total PAHs in the control tobacco pyrolysate. Similar studies on individual and total acids and individual and total phenols in the same pyrolysates reveal that the sum of the total phenols in the pyrolysate of the PEE and RES was 21% less than the total phenols in the control tobacco pyrolysate, for acids, the sum of total acids in the pyrolysates from the two fractions (PEE plus RES) was 13% greater than the total acids in the control tobacco pyrolysate. If this situation prevails in the relatively simple situation (petroleum ether extractables, extracted tobacco residue, and unextracted control tobacco) described above, then it is highly
likely that the discrepancy will be enhanced when individual compounds are considered, that is, there will be substantial uncertainty in any attempt to extrapolate from pyrolysis data on a specific compound, either present in or proposed to be added to tobacco, to what will actually happen to that compound during the smoking of a cigarette. Since Severson et al. (3616) defined the composition of the eight chromatographic fractions, the remainder of their research findings will be discussed in the following section.
XXV.C Individual Tobacco Components The research conducted from the early 1950s to the mid1960s on the organic solvent-soluble precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in cigarette MSS has been described in detail by Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 345–351, 518 in (4332)] and Hoffmann and Wynder (1798). Despite the fact that the tumorigenic PAHs at their levels in cigarette smoke and acting in concert with promoting and/or cocarcinogenic but nontumorigenic PAHs, phenols, acids, etc., at their levels in cigarette smoke explain only a small fraction (less than 2%) of the biological response (measured as % TBA) observed in skin-painted laboratory animals, efforts to define the major precursors in tobacco of the tumorigenic PAHs in cigarette smoke were continued into the late 1970s, particularly by the USDA group at Athens, Georgia (3616). Despite the advances during this period in the laboratory techniques for (1)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1115
11/13/08 5:56:19 PM
1116
successful fractionation of complex mixtures such as those found in cigarette MSS and in the pyrolysates from various tobaccos, tobacco fractions, and tobacco components and (2) the quantitation of the levels of individual identified PAHs, phenols, aldehydes, ketones, etc., no revolutionary new precursor in tobacco of PAHs in tobacco smoke was discovered. The organic solvent-soluble tobacco components that yielded PAHs on pyrolysis were essentially those or structurally similar to those that had been proposed several decades earlier in the 1950s. Several tobacco components, structurally similar to those proposed earlier, had not been identified as tobacco components in the 1950s, but once they were identified, logic dictated they would yield PAHs either on pyrolysis or during the tobacco smoking process. For example, in the late 1950s, Wright [(4282), see also Rodgman (3243)] theorized that the high molecular weight terpenes (other than the phytosterols) and the phytosterols themselves were major precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in tobacco smoke. These proposals were subsequently confirmed. In 1958, Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291) demonstrated in a “spiking” experiment with solanesol, that it was an effective precursor of total and individual PAHs in cigarette MSS as indicated by the increased levels in the PAHs in the MSS from solanesol-“spiked” tobacco cigarettes vs. those in the MSS from control tobacco cigarettes. Similarly, Rodgman and Cook reported that results from phytosterol-“spiked” tobacco cigarettes indicated the phytosterol was a major precursor of PAHs in MSS. In 1979, Severson et al. (3616) demonstrated that solanesol pyrolysis generated substantial amounts of PAHs vs. other organic solvent-soluble tobacco components. In subsequent sections, pyrolysis studies on various tobacco components categorized as follows will be discussed: Nicotine Organic solvent-soluble components: long-chained aliphatic saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons; terpenoid alcohols such as the duvanediols, phytosterols, phytol, and solanesol; normal long-chained aliphatic alcohols; esters of these groups of alcohols with long-chained aliphatic acids (palmitic, stearic, oleic, etc.) Structural components of tobacco (the biopolymers such as lignin and the polysaccharides cellulose, starch, and pectins and their constituent monosaccharides such as glucose and fructose) Acids Proteins and amino acids Nicotine (as well as the other nicotine-related alkaloids in tobacco, usually present in trace amounts) is the one tobacco component whose level in tobacco is sometimes controlled by removal in a denicotinization process. In contrast to the removal or reduction of its level in the case of nicotine, materials such as simple sugars, glycerol, and some flavorants are added to the tobacco blend to augment their existing levels in the tobacco and to enhance certain consumer acceptable organoleptic properties of the MSS. Materials such as
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
licorice, cocoa, and other flavorants are added to impart other consumer acceptable organoleptic properties to the smoke (2341).
XXV.C.1 Nicotine Over the years, the results of numerous studies on the pyrolysis of nicotine have been published. Many of them, for example, those of Frank et al. (25A22) and Woodward et al. (4275a, 25A84, 25A85) in the early 1940s, preceded the escalation in the 1950s of the interest in the cigarette smoke-health issue. Other early studies of nicotine pyrolysis in air or nitrogen included those in the early 1960s by Jarboe and Rosene (1923a) and Kobashi et al. (25A37, 25A38). In 1964, pyrolysis products generated from nicotine during the tobacco smoking process were summarized by Kuhn (2228). In 1960, Van Duuren et al. (4027) extended their studies on tumorigenic PAHs in mainstream CSC to identify three tumorigenic N-heterocyclic compounds: the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo [c,g]-carbazole. Their yields were 0.1, 2.7, and 0.7 ng/cigarette, respectively, substantially less than that of the nanogram per cigarette yield reported for B[a]P in the early 1960s. These three N-heterocyclics had also been reported as mouse-skin tumorigens [see tabulation in Hartwell (1544)]. Dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine were also identified by Van Duuren et al. in pyrolysates from nicotine and pyridine (750°C, N2). However, the presence of these aza-arenes in tobacco smoke or nicotine pyrolysate has been questioned. Of the numerous reports on this class of compound in tobacco smoke, only one report describes the identification of one of the three, dibenz[a,j]acridine: Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) reported that their group, Candeli et al. (587), was able to confirm the presence of dibenz[a,j]acridine but not dibenz[a,h]acridine in mainstream CSC. The per cigarette yield for dibenz[a,j]acridine reported by Candeli et al. (587) was almost four times that reported by Van Duuren et al. Since 1963, no other investigator has reported these three compounds in tobacco smoke or a nicotine pyrolysate. In 1970, Kaburaki et al. (2006) reported the results of their pyrolysis of nicotine at various temperatures in air and in N2. The two tumorigenic benzacridines reported in a nicotine pyrolysate by Van Duuren et al. as components of their nicotine pyrolysate were not found by Kaburaki et al. Schmeltz et al. (3499) described the results of their pyrolysis of several nitrogenous tobacco components, including nicotine: We could not detect benzo(a)pyrene in nicotine pyrolyzates, nor could we confirm the presence of the physiologically active dibenzacridines and dibenzcarbazole reported in tobacco smoke and in nicotine and pyridine pyrolyzates by Van Duuren [4027].
In their review of the pyrogenesis of tobacco smoke components, Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) emphasized the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1116
11/13/08 5:56:20 PM
1117
Pyrolysis
failures of several investigators to confirm the two dibenzacridines and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in nicotine pyrolysates: Since nicotine is the most abundant and best known tobacco alkaloid, its pyrolysis has been thoroughly studied [Woodward et al. (4275a), Jarboe and Rosene (1923a)]. More recent work [Kaburaki et al. (2006)] on the pyrolysis of nicotine and various alkylpyridines has resulted in a proposed mechanism for the thermal degradation of nicotine … Schmeltz [Schmeltz et al. (3499)] also studied nicotine and identified a number of previously unreported compounds in the nicotine pyrolysates … These included pyrrole, acenaphthene, indole, skatole, and anthracene and/or phenanthrene. However, the presence of dibenzacridines and dibenzcarbazole, previously reported in nicotine and pyridine pyrolysates, could not be confirmed [Van Duuren et al. (4027)].
In 1977, Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) in their review of N-containing components of tobacco and tobacco smoke discussed the generation of various pyridines from nicotine during both the actual smoking process and pyrolysis. Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3491) did report the identification by Van Duuren et al. (4027) of the two dibenzacridines in cigarette smoke and nicotine pyrolysate. They did not, however, comment on the inability of other investigators (587, 2006, 3499) to confirm the findings of Van Duuren et al. In 1979, Schmeltz et al. (3512) reported their major findings from a study of the fate of radiolabeled nicotine during pyrolysis and during the actual smoking of a radiolabeled nicotine-treated cigarette: Under combustion tube pyrolysis conditions, nicotine in either silica gel matrix (pyrolysis temperature = 600°C, 750°C, or 900°C) or tobacco matrix (600°C) underwent extensive degradation to pyridines, quinolines, arylnitriles, and aromatic hydrocarbons. In a burning cigarette during actual smoking, a substantial portion of the nicotine (about 41%) remains intact, 12.5% is oxidized to carbon dioxide, as much as 11% is degraded to volatile alkylpyridines, and negligible amounts are converted to neutral or acidic components of the particulate phase. Dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine reported nearly two decades earlier by Van Duuren et al. (4027) were not identified in this study.
Schmeltz et al. (3512) noted: In ongoing studies we are now identifying those compounds that are formed from nicotine only as minor compounds (<0.1%) which nevertheless can contribute to the toxicity of the smoke. To this group of minor smoke constituents having nicotine as a precursor belong the dibenzacridines.
From their experimental results, Schmeltz et al. (3512) concluded: “These results suggest to us that pyrolysis experiments may be of limited value for establishing the fate of nicotine and possibly other tobacco components in a burning cigarette.” The pyrolysis system in this study [see Higman et al. (1648)] was designed to be the optimum simulation of the
smoking process. Obviously, nicotine did not behave in this pyrolysis system as it did in the burning cigarette during actual smoking. Examination of the 1979 Schmeltz et al. publication on the fate of nicotine during pyrolysis vs. actual smoking reveals at least two of the authors (Hoffmann and Schmeltz) definitely changed their opinion on their long-held view on the equivalence of compound behavior during pyrolysis and actual smoking, for example, Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) earlier wrote: Most pyrolysis studies with tobacco, tobacco extracts, extract fractions, individual components, and tobacco additives are performed in a nitrogen atmosphere. This procedure has often been criticized on the grounds that many of the toxic constituents formed during smoking of tobacco products occur as a result of combustion in air rather than in a nitrogen atmosphere. This criticism, however, cannot be maintained in view of studies by Newsome and Keith [2780] which demonstrated that a reducing rather than an oxidizing atmosphere exists at the cone region of a burning cigarette.
With regard to the dibenzacridines and dibenzocarbazole from nicotine during pyrolysis and the smoking process, Table XXV-4 summarizes the state of knowledge. None of the investigations conducted from 1963 through 2000 on the levels of these three aza-arenes in mainstream CSC confirmed the 1960 findings of Van Duuren et al. (4027). Another aspect of the involvement of nicotine (and related tobacco alkaloids) in the generation of allegedly harmful tobacco and/or smoke components is the formation of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs).* It is claimed by Hoffmann and his co-workers that TSNAs such as N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) are formed from nicotine and other minor nicotine-related alkaloids during various stages of tobacco development and treatment (growing, curing, and aging) [Hecht et al. (1563, 1564), Adams et al. (22)]. TSNAs appear in cigarette MSS as a result of two mechanisms: (1) direct transfer of the TSNAs from the tobacco to the smoke, and (2) pyrogenesis during the smoking process. For example, Hoffmann et al. (1734) and Adams et al. (29) estimated that 40% to 46% of the NNN in MSS was a result of its transfer from the tobacco blend. The remainder, 54% to 60%, in MSS was due to pyrogenesis of NNN from nicotine and nornicotine during the smoking process. Similar data were generated for NNK: 26% to 37% by direct transfer; 63% to 74% by pyrogenesis. The levels in MSS of TSNAs such as NNN can presumably be reduced by reduction in the level of nicotine and/or nitrate in the tobacco blend (499). However, Brunnemann et al. (511) have presented contradictory data on the significance of the correlations among the levels of nitrate, nicotine, and TSNAs in tobacco. *
TSNAs include N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) from nicotine and nornicotine, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) from nicotine, N’-nitrosoanatabine (NAT) from nicotine and anatabine, and N’-nitrosoanabasine (NAB) from anabasine.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1117
11/13/08 5:56:21 PM
1118
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-4 Dibenz[a,h]acridine, Dibenz[a,j]Acridine, and 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]Carbazole in Nicotine Pyrolysates (Pyr) and Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Condensate (CSC) Dibenz[a,h]Acridine
Dibenz[a,j]Acridine
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]Carbazole
Investigators
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Van Duuren et al. (4027) Candeli et al. (587), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Kaburaki et al. (2006) Schmeltz et al. (3499) Schmeltz et al. (3512) Snook (3733) Snook et al. (3750) Grimmer et al. (1409) Kamata et al. (2021) Sasaki and Moldoveanu (3414) Rustemeier et al. (3370)
yes NE no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
yes no NE NE no no no no no no no
yes NE no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
yes yes NE NE no no no no no no yes
No NE NE No No NE NE NE NE NE NE
yes NE NE NE no no no no NE NE NE
yes = Compound identified. no = Compound not found or identified. NE = Substrate not examined for compound in question.
Since the TSNAs are components of the MSS particulate phase, control of their levels in smoke is also possible by any means that controls the yield of the MSS particulate matter. These include: • • • •
Use of reconstituted tobacco sheet; Expanded tobacco; High filtration efficiency; Air dilution by increased paper porosity and/or ventilated filter tips (Hoffmann et al., 1984).
Unlike the volatile N-nitrosamines such as dimethylnitrosamine (DMNA), the TSNAs are not amenable to selective filtration by use of plasticized filter tips.
XXV.C.2 Organic Solvent-Soluble Components (Long-Chained Aliphatic Hydrocarbons, Phytosterols, Solanesol, High Molecular Weight Esters, etc.) The tobacco smoke components “known” in 1954 numbered fewer than 100 (2170). At that time, the chemical composition of tobacco was as equally ill-defined as that of its smoke. Pyrolyses conducted throughout the 1950s involved the organic solvent-soluble material from tobacco and were limited either to the total extractables or to a few classes of known tobacco components, for example, phytosterols and longchained saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons. These relatively high molecular weight compounds were present in tobacco at levels usually exceeding 0.5% and presented little problem in collecting sufficient material for study. Subsequent research on tobacco (and tobacco smoke) composition resulted in the isolation and elucidation of the structures of numerous classes of organic solvent-soluble compounds, including those listed in Table XXV-5.
The early work of Roffo (3327) on the reduction of tumorigenicity of a “destructive distillate” from a solvent-extracted tobacco (ethyl alcohol), his claim that alcohol extraction removed the tumorigen precursor from the tobacco, and his proposal of the phytosterols as the tumorigen precursor(s) were described previously. Despite the fact that the “destructive distillate” from tobacco was not equivalent to cigarette smoke particulate matter, the proposal of the phytosterols as precursors in tobacco of PAHs was based on sound reasoning and previous experimental findings. Nearly two decades earlier, Kennaway (2073–2075) had demonstrated that pyrolysis of isoprene, acetylene, and cholesterol yielded pyrolysates tumorigenic to mouse skin. Cholesterol was once considered unique to animal tissue but subsequently, trace amounts were found in plant tissue, including tobacco [Stedman (3797), Grunwald et al. (1434)]. Of the tobacco and tobacco smoke sterols, the two present at the highest level are stigmasterol and β-sitosterol. These differ from each other and cholesterol in the structure and configuration of the side chain on the cyclopentane ring. They occur in tobacco as free phytosterols and phytosteryl derivatives (esters, glycosides). Pyrolysis of sterols generates high levels of chrysene. Its four rings are configurationally similar to that of the sterol ring system. In the mid-1920s, Kennaway and others were concerned about the fate of cholesterol when animal tissue was heated during roasting and broiling. Cholesterol pyrolysis experiments were crude attempts to duplicate what happened to it during the cooking process. Here again, the presence of other tissue components (amino acids, proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) with cholesterol during cooking would certainly have affected the results when compared to the results obtained from pyrolysis of cholesterol alone. In 1928, Kennaway and Sampson (2080) also demonstrated that the specific tumorigenicities of pyrolysates from cholesterol and other organic compounds increased as the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1118
11/13/08 5:56:22 PM
1119
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-5 Organic Solvent-Soluble Components of Tobacco Identified Post-1955 Compound
Reported in Tobacco by
Reported in Tobacco Smoke By
Solanesol
Rowland et al. (3359)
Neophytadiene α-Tocopherol Squalene Solanesenes Solanesyl esters
Rowland (3345) Rowland (3347) Fredrickson (1229) — Rowland and Latimer (3358)
Phytosteryl esters Long-chained aliphatic alcohols Long-chained aliphatic esters
Rowland and Latimer (3358) Cook et al. (812) Rodgman et al. (3294), Arrendale et al. (103) Roberts (3195), Roberts and Rowland (3220, 3221), Rowland and Roberts (3360), Rowland et al. (3361) Severson et al. (3616)
Duvanediols
Phytyl esters
Mold and Booth (2590), Wynder and Wright (4354)a, Rodgman and Cook (3270) Rodgman (3247) Rodgman and Cook (3271) Van Duuren and Schmitt (4033), Rodgman et al. (3297) Rodgman et al. (3297) Rodgman and Cook (3270), Rodgman et al. (3296) Rodgman et al. (3296) Cook et al. (812) Rodgman et al. (3294) Rowland et al. (3361)
Rodgman and Cook (3287)
Wynder and Wright (4354) reported geraniol as a cigarette smoke constituent. However, the infrared spectrum of the isolate was identical with that of solanesol, not geraniol (Wright, private communication to Rodgman).
a
pyrolysis temperature was increased. This observation was later confirmed with saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons (2257) and phytosterols [Wynder et al. (4355, 4356)] isolated from tobacco. In the latter two studies, the yield of PAHs generated during pyrolysis of the compounds in question increased as the pyrolysis temperature increased. Wynder et al. (4355) and Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) reported that pyrolyses of a hexane extract of tobacco gave decreasing yields of pyrolysate “tar” as the pyrolysis temperature increased: 560°C, 50%; 640°C, 35%; 720°C, 32%; 800°C, 28%; and 880°C, 28%. They also reported that pyrolysis at 880°C of the hexane extractables in air vs. their pyrolysis in N2 gave pyrolysates whose yields were essentially the same (30% in air vs. 28% in N2) and whose specific tumorigenicities were comparable in skin-painting studies with the mouse and rabbit. Similar findings were reported for aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons pyrolyzed either in air or in N2 at 800°C with regard to PAH composition and specific tumorigenicity in skin-painting studies. Table XXV-6, adapted from Lam (2257), demonstrates the relationship between PAH generation and pyrolysis temperature for aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons pyrolyzed in air at several temperatures. Calculation of the yield ratios [PAH, mg/g: B[a]P, mg/g] of the other PAHs vs. B[a]P reveals significant information: In this case of pyrolysis, there was no consistency between the change in ratios of PAH/B[a]P as the temperature was increased from 700°C to 800°C, for example, in the case of the tetracyclic PAHs, the PAH/B[a]P ratio decreased for pyrene and chrysene but increased for fluoranthene; for the pentacyclic PAHs, the ratio decreased for both perylene and B[e]P; for the hexacyclic PAH dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene, the ratio increased. These same trends existed whether PAH/B[a]
P ratios were calculated as molar yields or, as in Table XXV-6, as absolute quantities (micrograms of PAHs generated per gram of aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons pyrolyzed). The significance of these data and calculations is their demonstration in 1956 that in even the simplest pyrolysis situation, B[a]P is not a valid “indicator” for the PAHs with four or more rings and their supposed relationship to tumorigenic activity [Wynder and Hoffmann (4317, 4319, 4332)]. In addition to these data by Lam, other contrary data that demonstrated the invalidity of the concept of B[a]P as an “indicator” for PAHs with four or more rings and the tumorigenicity of the substrate (CSC, pyrolysate) containing them were generated not only by Wynder et al. (4355, 4356) but also by Campbell and Lindsey (583), Rodgman and Cook (3286), Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), National Cancer Institute (2685), and Severson et al. (3616). The lack of correlation between CSC content of B[a]P and specific tumorigenicity was demonstrated by Lazar et al. (2320), who reported that a 30-fold increase in B[a]P content by its addition to CSC produced no increase in the specific tumorigenicity to mouse skin of the B[a]P-enhanced CSC vs. the control CSC applied at equal dose levels. This lack of correlation between the B[a]P concentration in CSC and its specific tumorigenicity was also recognized by the U.S. Surgeon General, who wrote in 1981 [see p. 36 in (4009)]: The contribution of BaP or PAH in general to mouse skin carcinogenesis by cigarette smoke condensate cannot be fully measured at this time. Wynder and Hoffmann [4332] found a correlation between BaP levels and carcinogenic activity of smoke condensates from several types of cigarettes. A much larger series of experimental cigarettes was studied in the smoking and health program of the National
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1119
11/13/08 5:56:23 PM
1120
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-6 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Aliphatic Tobacco Hydrocarbons Pyrolyzed in Air at Various Temperatures Quantity (µg) of PAH Formed on Pyrolysis (in air) of Aliphatic Tobacco Hydrocarbons (1.0 gram) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
At 800°C
At 700°C
PAH, µg/g
PAH/B[a]Pa
Naphthalene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Phenanthrene Anthracene Pyrene Fluoranthene Chrysene Perylene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[e]pyrene Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene
14260 0 3520 3840 580 960 1700 400 34 340 400 42
41.94 [2/5]b 0 [3/5]c 10.35 [3/5]c 11.29 [3/5]c 1.71 [3/5]c 2.82 [4/5]d 5.00 [4/5]d 1.18 [4/5]d 0.10 [5/5]e 1.00 1.18 [5/5]e 0.12 [6/5]f
Totals
26076
86.87
B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene [3/5] = tricyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P e [5/5] = pentacyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P
PAH, µg/g
At 600°C PAH/B[a]Pa
PAH, µg/g
4760 0 480 580 110 320 24 86 4 30 80 <1
158.7 0 16.00 19.33 3.67 10.67 0.80 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.67 <0.03
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6474
21.47
0
[2/5] = bicyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P [4/5] = tetracyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P f [6/5] = hexacyclic/pentacyclic B[a]P
a
b
c
d
Cancer Institute. No significant dependence of carcinogenic potency on BaP content was observed [Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), National Cancer Institute (2683].
The post-1930 stimulus for PAH research was provided by the following events: the independent syntheses of DB[a,h]A in 1929 by Clar (760) and Fieser and Dietz (1184); the demonstration of its mouse-skin tumorigenicity by Kennaway and Hieger (2078); the early 1930s reports by Cook et al. (726, 727) on several PAH isolates from coal tar, known to be tumorigenic to the skin of mice and rabbits; identification of two coal tar isolates as B[a]P and B[a]A; and the demonstration of the tumorigenicity to mouse skin of B[a]P (194, 726). In addition to Kennaway and Sampson (2080), numerous investigators after 1932–1933 examined the pyrolysates from sterols in conjunction not only with the alleged tumorigenicity and PAH content of “destructive distillates” from tobacco, CSCs, and pyrolysates of tobacco, tobacco extractables, and individual tobacco components but also with the alleged tumorigenicity and PAH content of heated foodstuffs and their role in digestive tract cancer. For example, Roffo, in addition to his tumorigenicity studies with “destructive distillates” from various tobaccos types (3320, 3324, 25A51) and organic solvent-extracted tobaccos (3327), investigated the tumorigenicity of heated or oxidized fats (25A53, 25A55, 25A59) and the “tars” and phenanthrene derivatives from cholesterol pyrolyzed (25A56, 25A57, 25A58) or irradiated in air (25A54). Other investigators who examined the chemical and biological properties of cholesterol pyrolysates included Steiner et al. (25A69), Falk et al. (1171), and Bischoff and Rupp
(25A10). Previously, Veldstra (4042a) had demonstrated that 3,5-cholestadiene, produced pyrolytically from cholesterol, was tumorigenic to skin-painted laboratory animals. Subsequently, cholesten-4-one was found to be both tumorigenic to mouse skin and a component of the pyrolysate from cholesterol and/or its derivatives. These and other pyrolysate findings on composition (PAHs in the pyrolysate) and properties (tumorigenicity of pyrolysate and/or the components of pyrolysates generated from cholesterol or its naturaloccurring derivatives) were summarized by Rodgman (3233, 3242). Although the pentacyclic PAH 1,2-dihydro-3methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (previously known as 3-methylcholanthrene or 20-methylcholanthrene), a potent mouse-skin tumorigen, may be prepared by a series of chemical reactions from a sterol-derived compound structurally related to cholesterol, it has never been identified in a sterol pyrolysate. Although Kröller (2191) claimed the identification of 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) in mainstream CSC, his identification of it was questioned by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), who asserted that it and other alkylated PAHs had never been reported as a combustion or pyrolysis product. Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) also questioned the reports by Pietzsch (2962) and Kröller (2191) of the presence in CSC of the methylated PAH DMB[a] A. It and other methylated PAHs in mainstream CSC were reported in 1960 by Rodgman and Cook (3273). In addition, in 1963 Grossman et al. (1431, 1432) reported alkylated naphthalenes in the pyrolysate from solanesol, a major tobacco component. In the 1970s, Snook et al. reported not only several dimethylbenz[a]anthracenes in CSC (3756) but also a great number of alkylated PAHs in CSC (3757). Thus, the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1120
11/13/08 5:56:24 PM
1121
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-7 Total, Free, and Bound Sterols in Cigarette Tobacco Total Free, µg/g Tobacco
Bound, µg/g Tobacco
Stigmasterol β-Sitosterol Campesterol Cholesterol
326 185 129 79
262 366 173 86
588 551 302 165
37 34 19 10
Total
719
887
1,606
100
Sterol
µg/g Tobacco
%
Wynder-Hoffmann assertion about the presence of alkylated PAHs in MSS was incorrect. Campesterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol, and cholesterol have been identified both free and/or bound (as esters, etc.) in tobacco and CSC [see Grunwald et al. (1434) for a summary of the early research on tobacco sterols and their derivatives]. In their study, Grunwald et al. found that these four sterols constituted about 0.16% of the tobacco weight and about 15% of them were transferred to MSS. According to Grunwald et al., the remainder of the sterols were “lost in the smoke sidestream, pyrolyzed during the smoking process and/or deposited in the butt.” Thus, a cigarette containing 1.0 g of the tobacco studied by Grunwald et al. would contain 1600 µg of these sterols and deliver about 240 µg to MSS. About 82 µg of the 240 µg would be β-sitosterol, a compound reported to be anticarcinogenic to several N-nitrosamines [Wattenberg (4149a)} and PAHs [Yasukawa et al. (25A86)]. Table XXV-7, adapted from Grunwald et al. (1434), indicates the relative proportions of these four sterols in tobacco: cholesterol is the least plentiful of the four tobacco sterols in Table XXV-7. Except for minor differences in the side-chain structure, the cholesteryl oleate studied by Veldstra (4042a) is structurally similar to the phytosteryl ester fraction isolated from tobacco by Rowland and Latimer (3358) and from CSC by Rodgman et al. (3296). It was subsequently identified as a mixture of esters of stigmasterol and β-sitosterol with longchained saturated (palmitic, stearic) and unsaturated (oleic, linoleic) acids. In the late 1950s to the early 1960s, Rodgman and Cook were unsuccessful in their CSC study to identify the stigmasterol- or β-sitosterol-derived dienes or ketones corresponding to the tumorigenic 3,5-cholestadiene and cholesten-4-one generated during pyrolysis of cholesterol or its esters. However, Benner et al. (273) subsequently identified 3,5-campestadiene (VIb) and 3,5-stigmastadiene (VId] in tobacco smoke, [see Eatough et al. (1099, 1100)]. The following paragraphs summarize the relationships, both known and proposed, between a sterol such as cholesterol and its various pyrolysis products. Because of the results of the studies by Kennaway (2073– 2076), Kennaway and Sampson (2080), and Roffo (25A56, 25A57, 25A58) on the generation of tumorigenic pyrolysates from cholesterol or cholesterol-containing foodstuffs, the
question was raised: What is the relationship between these observations on tumorigenic cholesterol pyrolysates and the incidence of stomach and digestive tract cancers? When many studies, beginning in 1934 [see summary in Hartwell (1544)], revealed that 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) was a potent tumorigen equivalent in potency in mouse skin-painting bioassays to B[a]P and DB[a,h]A, extensive research was conducted in attempts to determine whether it was generated from cholesterol during various cooking processes. Examination of the entries in the catalogs by Hartwell (1544) and Shubik and Hartwell (3664) for the four PAHs considered to be potent tumorigens revealed 474 studies involving 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j] aceanthrylene (3-methyl-cholanthrene) between 1934 and 1953, 410 studies involving B[a]P between 1932 and 1953, 275 studies involving DB[a,h]A between 1930 and 1953, and 91 studies involving DMB[a]A between 1938 and 1953. One of the most potent PAHs in mouse skin-tumor induction is 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) which theoretically could be formed pyrogenetically from sterols such as cholesterol {Ia}. In addition to the trace level of cholesterol present in tobacco, tobacco usually contains substantial levels of several phytosterols [campesterol {Ib}, β-sitosterol {Ic}, stigmasterol {Id}, and ergosterol {Ie}] structurally similar to cholesterol. These phytosterols differ from cholesterol {Ia} in the structure of the long side chain. Stigmasterol {Id} is structurally similar to β-sitosterol {Ic} except for a double bond at the C22 carbon. The legend to Figure XXV-1 indicates the differences among cholesterol, campesterol, β-sitosterol, ergosterol, and stigmasterol. These sterols, present in tobacco in both the free and bound form (as glycosides and esters), are transferred intact to MSS. These sterols constitute about 0.2% of the tobacco weight. Table XXV-7 illustrates the relative proportions of these sterols in tobacco. These data indicate that cholesterol and cholesteryl derivatives are the least plentiful of the free and bound sterols in tobacco. These levels are similar to those of the standard and reference cigarettes in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) “Less Hazardous” Program (1329, 1330, 1332 1333, 2683). As shown in Figure XXV-1, pyrolysis of cholesterol {Ia} yields chrysene {III} and a Diels’ hydrocarbon {IV}, a methylcyclopentaphenanthrene. Both PAHs have also been isolated from pyrolysates of the major tobacco phytosterols. While cholesterol {Ia} and the tobacco phytosterols [campesterol {Ib}, β-sitosterol {Ic}, and stigmasterol {Id}] have not been shown to generate 3-methylcholanthrene {II} on pyrolysis, cholesterol {Ia} and its esters with long-chained acids do generate the mouse-skin tumorigens 4-cholesten-3-one {Va} and 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa} (1171). Veldstra (4042a) reported that the pyrolysis of cholesteryl oleate also yielded 3,5-cholestadiene {VIa}. Cholesteryl oleate was probably a component of the mixture of steryl esters described in fluecured tobacco by Rowland and Latimer (3358) and in tobacco smoke by Rodgman et al. (3296). The steryl esters included sterols esterified with a series of saturated (palmitic, stearic, etc.) and unsaturated (oleic, linoleic, etc.) acids.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1121
11/13/08 5:56:25 PM
1122
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
R
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3 H3C IV
CH3
R CH3
O CH3
CH3
II
HO
V
R CH3
CH3
CH3
I
VI
III LEGEND Sterol,
R=
Ia Ib Ic Id Ie
cholesterol campesterol β-sitosterol stigmasterol ergosterola
II
1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene)
III
chrysene
IV
Diels´ hydrocarbon
Va Vb Vc Vd Ve
4-cholesten-3-one 4-campesten-3-one β-4-sitosten-3-one stigmasten-3-one ergostadien-3-one
VIa VIb VIc VId VIe
3,5-cholestadiene 3,5-campestadiene β-3,5-sitostadiene 3,5-stigmastadiene 3,5,7-ergostatriene
a
-(CH2)3-CH(CH3)2 -(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2 -(CH2)2-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2 -CH=CH-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2 -CH=CH-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2
Ergosterol has a double bond at the 7-position
Figure XXV-1 Possible sterol degradation products.
In the late 1950s, Rodgman proposed that on thermal degradation during the smoking process, campesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol and their esters might generate the ketones {Vb, Vc, Vd} and dienes {VIb, VIc, VId} analogous to 4-cholesten-3-one {Va} and 5-cholestadiene {VIa} and they might also be mouse-skin tumorigens like their cholesterol counterparts. Several PAHs other than chrysene and Diels′ hydrocarbon (Figure XXV-1) were subsequently identified in sterol pyrolysates. In 1959, Wynder et al. (4355, 4356) reported that PAHs were generated at both temperatures when tobacco sterols were pyrolyzed in air at 720°C and 850°C. At these temperatures, the pyrolysates constituted 28% and 22%, respectively, of the phytosterols pyrolyzed; B[a]P constituted
0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, of the pyrolysates. These results with phytosterols pyrolyzed at two different temperatures are similar to those reported for the pyrolyses of aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons (2255–2258). In 1962, Van Duuren (4022) described the identification of pyrene and B[a]P in a stigmasterol pyrolysate. Badger et al. (142) in their pyrolysis study of tobacco phytosterols reported the identification of some thirty PAHs, all previously reported as CSC components. They also noted the accentuated production of chrysene vs. its generation by pyrolysis of aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons. Chrysene, reported to be tumorigenic to mouse skin, is a sterol pyrolysis product characteristically generated at a high level compared to that for other PAHs in the pyrolysate. The four-ring arrangement in chrysene is
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1122
11/13/08 5:56:26 PM
1123
Pyrolysis
similar to that of the sterol rings. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) eventually removed chrysene from the tumorigen list. From a precursor “spiking” experiment involving addition to tobacco of aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons, a phytosterol (β-sitosterol), or solanesol, it was noted that the increase in the chrysene yield in the CSC was much more pronounced with phytosterol-treated tobacco than with aliphatic hydrocarbonor solanesol-treated tobacco (3251, 3269, 3291). Doubling the levels of solanesol, aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons, and phytosterols by addition of each to a control tobacco blend resulted in increases in the B[a]P yields in the mainstream CSCs of 13%, 13%, and 16%, respectively. However, the chrysene yields were increased by 16%, 28%, and 183%, respectively. Tripling the addition levels increased the B[a]P levels in the mainstream CSCs by 18%, 20%, and 28%, respectively, and the chrysene levels by 22%, 50%, and 239%, respectively. In their study of the petroleum ether-extractable material (8% of tobacco weight) from tobacco which was chromatographically separated into eight fractions (see Table XXV-8), Severson et al. (3616) identified PAHs in the pyrolysates from fractions F-2 and F-3 (containing phytosterol derivatives) and from fractions F-5 and F-6 (containing unbound phytosterols). Their PAH data for these four pyrolysates from phytosterol-rich tobacco fractions showed high yields of chrysene vs. those in the pyrolysates from the essentially phytosterolfree fractions (F-1, F-2, F-7, and F-8). Although their study dealt with pyrolysis of tobacco phytosterols, Schmeltz et al. (3511) did determine the percent conversion of phytosterols (and other components) to MSS PAHs by use of radiolabeled phytosterols generated by growing tobacco in an atmosphere containing radiolabeled CO2, isolating radiolabeled tobacco components, and adding them individually to cigarettes which were then smoked and the MSS analyzed. Their data are summarized in Table XXV-9. Their 1978 finding with radiolabel techniques (<1% conversion to PAHs) for the tobacco phytosterols is comparable to
Table XXV-8 Component Distribution in Eight Subfractions from a Petroleum Ether Extract of Tobacco (8% of Tobacco Weight) Chromatographic Fraction No.
%
Major Component(s)
F-1
5.3
F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 F-8
4.3 8.9 29.2 6.6 20.3 15.8 9.6
Long-chained saturated hydrocarbons, neophytadiene Esters of sterols and terpenoid alcohols Esters of sterols and solanesol Solanesol Solanesol, sterols, and long-chained fatty acids Sterols and long-chained fatty acids Polar esters of fatty acids Polar esters of fatty acids
Table XXV-9 Conversion of Tobacco Leaf Constituents to Total Mainstream Smoke Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Leaf Constituent Phytosterols Palmitic acid Neophytadiene Polar fraction Alkaloids
% Conversion to Mainstream PAHs <1.0 <1.0 0.10 0.15 0.10
the 1958 data of Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291) who, using classical chemical techniques in a “spiking” experiment, reported the conversion of β-sitosterol to PAHs to be about 0.6%. As noted by Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), the first group of tobacco components studied by pyrolysis was the “tobacco paraffins.” Subsequently, these were shown to consist of a mixture of n- (normal), iso- (2-methyl-), and anteiso(3-methyl-) saturated hydrocarbons CnH2n+2, the bulk of which comprised hydrocarbons ranging from ten or twelve to more than forty carbon atoms. These hydrocarbons were also extractable from tobacco by pentane, hexane, or petroleum ether. Pyrolysis studies in air or an inert atmosphere (N2, He) with either the tobacco-derived saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction or individual components of the fraction [see Lam (2255, 2256, 25A39), Wynder et al. (4356)] or individual hydrocarbons [see Lam et al. (2260) for n-pentacosane, Haefele and Giles (1480) for n-hentriacontane, Badger and Novotny (151) for n-decane, Badger et al. (142) and Lam (2256) for n-dotriacontane (dicetyl)] indicated that these tobacco components yielded pyrolysates reported to be tumorigenic in mouse skin-painting bioassays and to contain many PAHs, several of which were tumorigenic in long-term mouse skin-painting bioassays. The PAHs identified in the various pyrolysates ranged in complexity from bicyclic (naphthalenes), tricyclic (acenaphthenes, anthracenes, phenanthrenes), tetracyclic (pyrenes, fluoranthenes, chrysenes, benzanthracenes), pentacyclic (perylenes, benzopyrenes, dibenzanthracenes, benzofluoranthenes), hexacyclic (dibenzochrysenes), and heptacyclic (coronene). Eventually, all the PAHs identified in the various pyrolysates were identified in mainstream CSC. In every case where the pyrolysis temperature was lowered, the yields of the PAHs in the pyrolysate also decreased (see Table XXV-6). From data they generated, Rayburn and Wartman (3091) and Rayburn et al. (3092) challenged the concept that the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons in tobacco were precursors of the PAHs in mainstream CSC. Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), in turn, criticized the experimental procedures that provided the data upon which Rayburn et al. based their argument: The experimental findings (of Rayburn et al.) are partially based on total polycyclic hydrocarbons of similar ultraviolet
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1123
11/13/08 5:56:27 PM
1124 spectra and not on analytical data. The report did not mention counting techniques for C14-labeled paraffins nor their quenching effects. These, as well as other factors, appear to weaken considerably the challenge of a concept based on extensive experimental data.
In 1979, Severson et al. (3616), in their study of the petroleum ether extractables (8% of tobacco weight) chromatographically separated into eight fractions (see Table XXV-8), reported the identification of PAHs in the pyrolysate from fraction F-1, the fraction containing the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons extracted from the tobacco. As recently as 1985, Lam et al. (2260) identified numerous PAHs in the pyrolysate from n-pentacosane, a known component of the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbon fraction present in tobaccos. In 1958, Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3291) added tobaccoderived saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons to a tobacco blend in a “spiking” experiment and determined the effect of the addition on the PAH levels in mainstream CSC. They reported the added saturated hydrocarbons increased the yield of PAHs in cigarette MSS and thus were precursors of the smoke PAHs. The structure of the unsaturated C45 polyisoprenoid alcohol, solanesol, was established in 1956 by Rowland et al. (3359). Despite the fact that solanesol was one of the major individual components of the extractable waxes from tobacco, its pyrolysis was not reported until 1962. While Lam (2255) favored the saturated hydrocarbons as the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in smoke, Wynder (4294) considered both the saturated hydrocarbons and the phytosterols to be the major precursors. Wright (4282) proposed that the phytosterols and other terpenoids such as solanesol were the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in smoke. In spite of their differences of opinion on the relative importance of these tobacco components in their contribution to smoke PAHs, they collaborated on several studies in the late 1950s (4355, 4356). Subsequently, the saturated hydrocarbons, the phytosterols, and other terpenoids such as solanesol were shown to be important in the formation of PAHs in tobacco smoke (3251, 3269, 3291, 3616). In the early 1960s, Grossman et al. (1431, 1432) examined the pyrolysate from solanesol and reported the identification of monocyclic hydrocarbons (benzene and cyclopentene derivatives) (1431) and bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (naphthalenes) (1432). No tricyclic PAHs were reported. In 1963, Gil-Av and Shabtai (1286) postulated that solanesol in tobacco was a source of tobacco smoke PAHs and proposed a mechanism for their generation from solanesol. Solanesol and other similarly configured terpenoid compounds, for example, neophytadiene, squalene, and duvane derivatives, depolymerized during the smoking (or pyrolytic) process to produce isoprene which, in turn, reacted with itself and subsequent reaction products to generate a tumorigenic “tar” such as that described in the mid-1920s by Kennaway (2073–2075). This “tar” derived from solanesol via isoprene would contain the requisite tumorigenic PAHs such as B[a]P.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Although Gil-Av and Shabtai (1286) demonstrated the presence of B[a]P in an isoprene pyrolysate, they did not study the pyrolysis of solanesol. Severson et al. (3616) described the pyrogenesis of PAHs from solanesol in their study of the petroleum ether tobacco extractables (8% of tobacco weight) which they chromatographically separated into eight fractions (see Table XXV-8). Fraction F-4 was primarily solanesol. Fraction F-3 contained solanesyl esters. Severson et al. (3616) summarized the contribution of solanesol to PAHs in its pyrolysate (and in CSC): The carotenoids and solanesol are most like responsible for the high levels of the multialkylated PAH found in the [petroleum ether]-extract pyrolyzate and, by analogy, in CSC. Because of its relative abundance in leaf, solanesol may contribute as much as 40% of the benzopyrenes produced on pyrolysis of the [petroleum ether] extract of tobacco.
As noted previously, 1958 precursor experiments (3251, 3269, 3291), in which solanesol was added at several levels in a “spiking” experiment and the effect of this addition on the levels of total and individual PAHs in cigarette MSS were determined, demonstrated that solanesol in tobacco was indeed a precursor of PAHs in cigarette MSS. Phytol, a terpenoid alcohol, is a known component of tobacco leaf. It and its structurally similar dehydration product, neophytadiene, probably occur in tobacco leaf through the degradation of chlorophyll whose structure includes phytol (3345). Neophytadiene (3247), phytol (3285), and phytyl esters (3287) are present in tobacco smoke (see Table XXV-5). Schmeltz et al. (3511), in their 1978 radiolabel study, determined the contribution of neophytadiene to PAHs in cigarette MSS. They estimated that about 0.1% of the tobacco neophytadiene is converted during the smoking process to PAHs in the MSS (see Table XXV-9). The pyrolysis products of neophytadiene and phytol were examined in 1985 by Lam et al. (2260). Numerous PAHs were identified in both pyrolysates. Normal long-chained aliphatic alcohols, known minor components of tobacco (614, 615, 25A18, 25A80) and tobacco smoke (812), may not play a significant role as PAH precursors. In fact, Carruthers and Johnstone (614, 615), who identified 1-docosanol in tobacco, found little of its dehydration product, 1-docosene, in tobacco smoke. They postulated that long-chained primary alcohols such as 1-docosanol were little affected by pyrolysis. Severson et al. (3616) cataloged the major components in eight chromatographic fractions of the petroleum ether extractables from tobacco (see Table XXV-8). Each fraction was subjected to pyrolysis. Surprisingly, Severson et al. did not list long-chained primary alcohols in any of the eight chromatographic fractions!
XXV.C.3 Structural Components of Tobacco (Cellulose, Lignin, Pectins, etc.) Since cellulose, the pectins, starch, lignin, and proteins— the so-called structural components of tobacco—are organic compounds, that is, contain carbon, with one or more of the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1124
11/13/08 5:56:28 PM
1125
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-10 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Tobacco Components Pyrolyzed in a N2 Atmosphere at 650°C Quantity (ng) of PAH Formed on Pyrolysis of Tobacco Componenta (1.0 mg) at 650°C (in N2) PAHb
Cell
Lign
Pect
Star
Sucr
Gluc
Fruc
Mal
Citr
Oxal
Acenaphthylene Fluorene Anthracene Pyrene Pyrene, 3-methylFluoranthene Benz[a]anthracenec Benzo[a]pyrenec Benzo[e]pyrenec Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene Coronene
1.60 5.84 3.37 1.29 1.31 1.64 1.86 0.78 0.85 0.10 0.44
0.80 80.00 5.44 0.33 0 0.58 0.44 0.47 0.22 0 0
0.20 2.87 5.39 1.33 0.29 1.52 2.73 0.45 0.34 0.09 0.15
0.56 0.32 1.04 0.35 0.11 0.94 1.16 0.17 0.04 0.01 0.03
0.24 0.12 0.70 0.24 0.15 0.35 0.41 0.10 0.02 0 0.03
0.27 0.07 0.36 0.66 0.01 0.45 0.43 0.29 0.11 0.05 0.01
1.04 1.18 1.39 0.35 0.11 1.06 1.20 0.33 0.02 0.05 0.05
0.16 6.32 0.70 1.66 1.19 1.36 1.30 0.35 0.08 0.01 0.06
0.50 1.73 0.98 0.24 0.89 0.06 0.05 0.17 0.37 0.02 0.11
0.15 0.03 0.30 0.20 0.01 0 0 0.01 0 0.003 0.02
a
b
c
Cell = cellulose; Lign = lignin; Pect = pectin; Star = starch; Sucr = sucrose; Gluc = glucose; Fruc = fructose; Mal = malic acid; Citr = citric acid; Oxal = oxalic acid. Several other PAHs were found in some, but not all, of the pyrolysates, namely, azulene, naphthalene, alkylnaphthalenes, acenaphthene, phenanthrene, and perylene. Tumorigenic to mouse skin in skin-painting studies.
carbons linked to hydrogen,* they will generate PAHs during high-temperature pyrolysis much in the same manner as the compounds studied in the mid-1920s and early 1930s by Kennaway (2073–2076). In his studies, Kennaway demonstrated that pyrolysis of various organic compounds—from simple ones such as acetylene or isoprene to more complex ones—would generate pyrolysates tumorigenic to mouse skin. Subsequently, these and similar organic compound-derived pyrolysates were shown to contain a variety of PAHs (1286, 2264b), some of which were potent mouse-skin tumorigens. Obviously, PAHs should be generated from the structural components of tobacco during the reactions occurring when tobacco is smoked in a cigarette. Interest in the major precursors in tobacco of the PAHs in MSS eventually led to the conclusion that the major precursors in tobacco of cigarette MSS PAHs in cigarette MSS were the organic solvent-extractable, high molecular weight tobacco components, such as the saturated aliphatic and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons, the phytosterols, and terpenoid alcohols such as solanesol (3251, 3269, 3291, 3616, 4332). During the search for the major PAH precursors in tobacco, all of the above-mentioned organic solvent-soluble tobacco components (see Table XXV-5) that were examined by pyrolysis were shown to yield PAHs. In 1957, Gilbert and Lindsey *
Examination of the data reported by Gilbert and Lindsey (1289) on the pyrogenesis of PAHs from various tobacco constituents would appear to contradict this statement. Gilbert and Lindsey reported the generation of a series of PAHs in the pyrolysate (see Table XXV-10) from the dicarboxylic acid oxalic acid [(COOH)2] which obviously has no carbon-hydrogen bond. However, it is known that a major product of the thermal decomposition of oxalic acid is formic acid [H-COOH] via decarboxylation. Formic acid does have the requisite carbon-hydrogen bond.
(1289) reported their results on the amounts of various PAHs in the pyrolysates (650°C, N2) from the major structural components from flue-cured tobacco. These included cellulose, pectins, starch and lignin, the simple sugars sucrose, glucose, and fructose, and the acids malic acid, citric acid, and oxalic. Their data, modified to indicate nanograms of individual PAHs generated per milligram of tobacco component pyrolyzed,† are summarized in Table XXV-10. Numerous pyrolysis experiments were conducted from the mid-1950s to the mid-1980s on tobacco components and tobacco fractions and residues obtained by solvent extraction of tobacco. However, meaningful comparison of the results has been difficult because of the lack of uniformity in the pyrolysis conditions employed in the studies. Even when some similarity existed between experimental conditions used in two separate experiments, precise comparison was confounded by the fact that different tobaccos or blends were used in the experiments, for example, Gilbert and Lindsey (1289) examined the PAH yields in the pyrolysates (650°C, N2) from the structural components of a flue-cured tobacco grown a year or two prior to their 1957 study; Severson et al. (3616) examined the pyrolysates (produced at a variety of temperatures including 650°C, N2) from a flue-cured tobacco probably grown a few years before their 1979 publication and from a tobacco blend. In their detailed study, Severson et al. (3616) examined the following pyrolysates: a flue-cured tobacco; its petroleum ether extractables (8% of the tobacco weight), PEE; the tobacco †
Nanogram of PAH generated per milligram of tobacco component pyrolyzed = microgram of PAH generated per gram of tobacco component pyrolyzed = parts per million (ppm) of PAH from the tobacco component pyrolyzed.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1125
11/13/08 5:56:29 PM
1126
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-11 Conversion of Components in Tobacco to Benzo[a]pyrene during Pyrolysis Theoretical Contribution toa Level in Tobacco Tobacco Component of Fraction
%
Pyrolysis
Benzo[a]pyrene
Total Benzopyrenesb
mg/g
T, °C
Atmos
ng/mg
ng
ng/mg
650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650 650
N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2
0.78 0.47 0.45 0.17 0.10 0.29 0.33 0.35 0.17 0.01
70.2 16.5 48.2 6.8 4.2 31.9 25.7 35.4 1.0 0.1
1.43 0.69 0.79 0.21 0.12 0.40 0.35 0.43 0.54 0.01
ng
Flue-Cured Tobacco Components (1289) Cellulose Lignin Pectin Starch Sucrose Glucose Fructose Malic acid Citric acid Oxalic acid
9.0 3.5 10.7 4.0 4.2 11.0 7.8 10.1 0.6 1.0
90 35 107 40 42 110 78 101 6 10
Total
61.9
619
240.0
128.7 24.2 84.5 8.4 5.0 44.0 27.3 43.4 3.2 0.1 368.8
Fractions From Flue-Cured Tobacco (3616) F-1 Aliphatic hydrocarbons F-4 Solanesol F-6 Phytosterols
0.42 2.34 1.62
42 234 162
650 650 650
N2 N2 N2
29 930 670
122 21762 10854
320 380 1140
25600 30400 91200
0 110 740
0 550 700
Fractions From University of Kentucky 1R1 Tobacco Blend (3616) Petroleum ether extractables Petroleum ether extractables Petroleum ether extractables 1R1 tobacco blend Petroleum ether extractables Petroleum ether extractables
8.0 8.0 8.0 100.0 8.0 92.0
80 80 80 1000 80 920
650 700 800 700 700 700
N2 N2 N2 N2 N2 N2
190 1750 54
190000 140000 50000
5 5 5
600 700 800
Air Air Air
0 30 340
0 30 1700
Other Studies with Tobacco Components (2257) Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons c Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons c Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons c
0.5 0.5 0.5
Flue-Cured Cigarette Smoke Condensate (4317)
90 d
It is assumed that 1 g of tobacco is consumed during the cigarette smoking. Total BP = B[a]P + B[e]P c Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons isolated from flue-cured tobacco. d Estimated total of B[a]P in MSS (4317) plus SSS from an all-flue cured tobacco cigarette is 45 ng in MSS plus an estimated 45 ng in SSS. a
b
residue after petroleum ether extraction, RES; and eight chromatographic fractions (F-1 through F-8) derived from the PEE. Unfortunately, Severson et al. conducted several key pyrolysis experiments at 700°C only. It should also be noted that tobaccos, such as the flue-cured tobaccos used by Gilbert and Lindsey and by Severson et al., would not be identical because of the differences in agronomic conditions and practices for the tobaccos grown in the mid-1950s vs. the mid-1970s. Table XXV-11 summarizes pyrolysis data from Lam (2257), Gilbert and Lindsey (1289), and Severson et al. (3616) with particular emphasis on the somewhat similar experimental conditions (pyrolysis temperature, atmosphere) and on the yields of B[a]P and B[e]P from the pyrolysis of different tobaccos, blend, components, and/or fractions. The data in Table XXV-1l, plus additional data in the publications cited, indicate that the structural components as well as other components and fractions (organic solvent-soluble
or insoluble) from tobacco yielded a variety of PAHs on pyrolysis, but the structural components—the biopolymers— such as cellulose, pectins, starch, lignin, etc., on a per unit weight pyrolyzed basis generated much lower yields of PAHs than did the organic solvent-soluble components and/or fractions. Even in the cases where tobacco components are not only soluble in organic solvents but also are relatively highly oxygenated, they show a low propensity to generate PAHs on pyrolysis. This fact was demonstrated by Severson et al. (3616) in their study of the pyrolysates from the eight chromatographic fractions from the petroleum ether extractables from flue-cured tobacco. They noted: Extraction fractions F-1 and F-8 yielded relatively low yields of PAH on pyrolysis, the former because of its thermally stable hydrocarbon content, and the latter because of its polar oxygenated constituent content. Such oxygenated compounds, having a relatively low carbon content yield low
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1126
11/13/08 5:56:30 PM
1127
Pyrolysis amounts of the alkyl residues essential for PAH formation [see Badger et al. (148), Schmeltz and Hoffmann (3489)].
The F-8 components that Severson et al. in their pyrolysis studies demonstrated to have a low propensity to yield PAHs on pyrolysis are similar both structurally and property-wise (molecular weight, volatility) to some of the compounds used in “top dressing” formulations for tobacco smoking products [see tabulations in Doull et al. (1053), Leffingwell et al. (2341)]. Presumably, “top dressing” components applied to tobacco products on pyrolysis would behave similarly during pyrolysis to the F-8 oxygenated tobacco components described by Severson et al. [see pp. 284–285 in (3616)]. Even though the structural components of tobacco on pyrolysis did yield PAHs, albeit at a much lower level than other classes of tobacco components, their contribution to tobacco smoke composition became important from another point of view: when only a small portion (about 2% to 3%) of the biological response observed in mice (or other rodents) skin-painted with CSC could be explained by its content of the PAHs reported to be tumorigenic to mouse skin [see pp. 14–52 in (4005), Wynder et al. (4303)] additional explanations for the observed biological response were sought. The concepts of promotion and co-carcinogenesis were introduced into the theory of CSC tumorigenicity in an attempt to explain the observed biological response in the mouse skin-painting studies. In the 1950s, Boutwell et al. (414) and Boutwell and Bosch (414) reported that low molecular weight phenols such as phenol itself and the cresols, nontumorigenic per se in skinpainting experiments, enhanced the tumorigenicity in mouse skin-painting studies of PAHs reported to be tumorigens. In 1959, Roe et al. (3314) reported the promoting effect of a phenolic fraction from cigarette MSS. Two years later, Wynder and Hoffmann (4313) examined phenol as a promoter of several PAHs (B[a]P, DMB[a]A) and concluded: Promoting substances present in tobacco smoke can increase and accelerate the tumor yield of carcinogenic polynuclear hydrocarbons that by themselves are not present in sufficient concentration to yield any tumors or yield them only after a prolonged latent period.
The low molecular weight phenols are extremely low-level components of tobacco but are present in cigarette MSS at levels many times those in tobacco. This led to the search in the late 1950s and early 1960s for precursors in tobacco of the alleged biologically active phenols in tobacco smoke. Studies by Rodgman and Cook (3277), Rodgman and Mims (3305), and Rodgman (3251) on the effect of tobacco components (lignin, pectin) added to a cigarette tobacco blend on low molecular weight phenols levels in MSS and similar studies [Spears et al. (3767), Bell et al. (248)] on the effect of tobacco carbohydrates (glucose, sucrose, starch, cellulose, or pectin) added to cigarette tobacco filler on phenols levels in MSS demonstrated that these tobacco components were major precursors of the simple phenols in cigarette MSS. From 1962 through 1971, Newell and Best conducted studies with radiolabeled components isolated from tobaccos
Table XXV-12 Conversion of Pectins, Starch, and Cellulose to Specific Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Phenols during Smoking Percent of Added Tobacco Component Converted during Smoking to Smoke Component Smoke Component
Pectins
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Pyrene NDb Benzo[a]pyrene 0.0000014 Benz[e]acephenanthrylene a 0.0000018 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.0000032 Phenols Phenol o-Cresol m-Cresol + p-Cresol Guaiacol 2,5-Xylenol
0.00125 0.0010 0.00077 0.00115 ND
Starch
Cellulose
ND 0.0000136 0.0000017 ND
0.0000546 0.0000021 0.0000060 ND
0.0034 0.0030 ND ND ND
0.0036 0.0046 0.0048 0.0024 0.0022
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene was formerly known as benzo[b]fluoranthene b ND = not determined a
grown in a radiolabeled CO2 atmosphere. Among these radiolabeled components studied were the cell-wall components or biopolymers [pectin (2764), starch (2764), α-cellulose (2764] of the tobacco. Each component was added individually to cigarette tobacco and their contributions to various classes of MSS components, particularly the PAHs and the phenols, were determined. Table XXV-12 summarizes the Newell-Best findings on the percent conversion during smoking of these three structural components to specific PAHs and phenols. Examination of these data indicates that the percent conversion of these structural components to phenol ranges from one (0.0013%) to about four (0.0036%) one-thousandths of a percent, whereas the conversion of these three components to benzo[a]pyrene ranges from about one (0.0000014%) to about fourteen (0.0000136%) one-millionth of a percent. Such data may be used to estimate the conversion to PAHs and phenols of a flavorant (structurally similar to but of lower molecular weight and higher volatility than these biopolymers) added to the tobacco blend. Numerous pyrolysis studies were conducted on these precursors of phenols. In each case, the generation of simple phenols (phenol, cresols, and numerous xylenols) was observed. Kato et al. (2043) reported the pyrolysis of tobacco lignin yielded phenol, cresols, xylenols, and guaiacol—all known components of cigarette MSS. Examination of the structure of lignin reveals why it would readily yield these phenols as well as other substituted phenols such as vanillin [Ball (176a)]. From the mid-1960s to the early 1980s, the USDA tobacco research group—initially at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and subsequently at Athens, Georgia—described the pyrolysis of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1127
11/13/08 5:56:31 PM
1128
various tobacco components and the yield of phenols in the pyrolysates. Tobacco components examined for their propensity to generate the simple phenols during pyrolysis included: • Cellulose, pectin, lignin, and the so-called tobacco pigment (3468). • The major tobacco polycarboxylic acids—malic, citric, and fumaric plus the sodium salts of citric and lactic acids (3486). In the late 1950s, a mixture of sodium and potassium citrates was used as an additive on cigarette paper to control its combustion properties.* • Tobacco and tobacco extracts [Kennedy and Riehl (25A35), Schlotzhauer et al. (3456), Severson et al. (3616)]. • Cellulose, glucose, and fructose [Higman et al. (1647)]. The latter two sugars† are used in casing materials applied to cigarettes during manufacture [Leffingwell et al. (2341)]. With regard to the generation of phenols by the tobacco acids, Schmeltz et al. (3486) noted: The data show that citric, malic and related acids give rise to phenols on pyrolysis. The yields, however, are lower than those from other phenol-forming materials present in tobacco leaf.
Despite the repeated assertions of the promoting potency for PAHs of the CSC phenolic fraction [Roe et al. (3314)] and the simple phenols, particularly phenol itself [Wynder and Hoffmann (4313, 4332)], contradictory evidence was reported. In 1962, Bock and Moore (25A11) challenged the concept that the weakly acidic portion of CSC was a tumor promoter. In fact, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319), strong proponents in 1964 of the promoting effect of the phenols in smoke, wrote “Definite tumor-promoting activity for a variety of phenols may be regarded as established.” However, this statement was omitted from their 1967 book in which Wynder and Hoffmann [see p. 626 in (4332)] wrote: Phenol and some of its derivatives have been shown to possess tumor-promoting activity … However, a reduction of phenols in tobacco smoke condensate has not led to a concomitant reduction of tumorigenicity in the corresponding “tars.” A mixture of sodium and potassium salts of citric acid was used as a cigarette paper additive, initially at RJRT and subsequently throughout the U.S. tobacco industry since the late 1950s. This additive ensured that the cigarette paper combustion char line slightly preceded the tobacco combustion char line. In the late 1950s, Rodgman (3246) demonstrated that inclusion of sodium and potassium citrates in the cigarette paper additive system reduced the levels of PAHs in the MSS. † Glucose and fructose are naturally occurring components present at relatively high levels (10% to 25%) in Oriental and flue-cured tobaccos but at relatively low levels (usually less than 2%) in burley and Maryland tobaccos, for example, see Wynder and Hoffmann (4332). For many years, the two simple sugars glucose and fructose were added as such or in the form of “invert sugars” to the cigarette blend as part of the casing materials formulation. Low levels of the disaccharide sucrose, a known naturally occurring component of tobacco, were also added. *
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
In 1971, Van Duuren et al. (4035), in a discussion of tumor promoters and the complexity of CSC and its potential role in carcinogenesis, reported: “Phenol, which is a weak tumor-promoting agent, is indeed an inhibitor of tumorigenesis when applied simultaneously with benzo[a]pyrene.” Two years later, Van Duuren et al. (4029) concluded from their cocarcinogenesis research: “Phenol has been regarded as an important ‘tumor promoter’ in [cigarette smoke condensate] … [but our] work indicates that it is inactive in cocarcinogenesis and, indeed, has a slight inhibitory effect on benzo[a]pyrene carcinogenesis.” Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722) reviewed the studies reported during the preceding two decades on pyrolysis of tobacco components and the relationship of the pyrolysis results to the pyrogenesis of tobacco smoke components. In 1979, Martin et al. (2468a) not only reported the results of their own research on the generation of a variety of phenols during the pyrolysis of lignin derived from several sources but also reviewed the results of their own and earlier studies by other investigators on lignin pyrolysis. From their 1981 and 1982 studies on pyrolysis, Schlotzhauer and Chortyk (3453) and Schlotzhauer et al. (3452) reported the pyrogenesis of phenols not only from cellulose and lignin but also from chlorogenic acid and other polyphenols. Cellulose was defined as a major precursor of cresols and xylenols in smoke; lignin as a major precursor of guaiacol, eugenol, and catechol in smoke; the polyphenols, such as chlorogenic acid, as major precursors of the catechols in smoke. In 1975, Schlotzhauer and Chortyk (3452), emphasizing the toxicants in tobacco smoke, reported that the yields of PAHs and phenols in the pyrolysate from reconstituted tobacco sheet (RTS) were significantly lower than those from flue-cured tobacco leaf when generated under the same experimental conditions. Extrapolating their pyrolysis results to the formation of specific components of tobacco smoke, Schlotzhauer and Chortyk noted that “the continued use of reconstituted tobacco sheet in tobacco products appears warranted.” Comparison of data obtained under different pyrolysis conditions with cellulose, glucose, and fructose with data generated under actual smoking conditions reveals the problem of attempting such a comparison. In Table XXV-13 are summarized data from Gilbert and Lindsey (1289), Higman et al. (1647), and Newell and Best (2764) on the conversion (ppm or μg/g) of such tobacco components to B[a]P during pyrolysis under two different conditions (650°C and 840°C, N2) and when smoked in a cigarette under actual smoking conditions (35-ml puff, 2-sec puff duration, 1 puff/min). The degree of conversion of tobacco components such as cellulose to B[a] P under different pyrolysis conditions parallels the degree of conversion of other tobacco components such as the saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons to B[a]P under different pyrolysis conditions; for example, Lam (2257) and his findings summarized in Table XXV-11. The conversion of cellulose to B[a] P increases several hundredfold as the pyrolysis temperature increased nearly 200°C (from 650°C to 840°C). Under actual smoking conditions, the cellulose-to-B[a]P conversion was
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1128
11/13/08 5:56:32 PM
1129
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-13 Pyrolysis vs. Actual Smoking Conditions: Conversion of Glucose, Fructose, and Cellulose to Benzo[a]pyrene Conversion (ppm or µg/g) of Tobacco Component to Benzo[a]pyrene Experimental Conditions Pyrolysis (650°C, N2) [Gilbert and Lindsey (1289)] Pyrolysis (840°C, N2) [Higman et al. (1647)] Actual smoking conditions (35-ml puff, 2-sec duration, 1 puff/min) [Newell and Best (2764)] a
Glucose
Fructose
Cellulose
0.29
0.33
0.78
47.5 NDa
98.4 ND
288.8 0.21
ND = not determined
less than 30%* of the conversion at 650°C. Similarly, under actual smoking conditions, the conversion of cellulose to B[a] P was only 0.073% of the conversion at 840°C. Thus, these data from several sources indicate that the fate of a tobacco component on pyrolysis is not equivalent to its fate under actual smoking conditions [see the conclusion of Schmeltz et al. (3512) on the fate of nicotine on pyrolysis vs. its fate during actual smoking]. As noted in reviews of the thermal degradation products from tobacco carbohydrates (cellulose, pectins, starch, and sugars) by Roberts et al. (3225) and by Schumacher (3551), pyrolysis of the carbohydrate components of tobacco results in generation of several classes of compounds other than PAHs and phenols. Among these were aldehydes and ketones, considered significant in smoking-respiratory tract issues. It was asserted during the 1960s that aldehydes and ketones, shown to be ciliastatic in vitro to ciliated tissue, were important because of their significant impairment (by extrapolation) of the action of human respiratory tract cilia. Such impairment was considered part of the mechanism of lung cancer causation by cigarette smoke. However, their importance diminished after the reported findings of Dalhamn et al. (892) that these cigarette smoke-derived, water-soluble in vitro ciliastats were removed in large part by the “scrubbing action” of the fluids coating the surfaces of the oral cavity and laryngeal area, a phenomenon demonstrated several years earlier by Rodgman et al. (3306). Early studies (1955–1959) on carbonyl components included those of Fredrickson (1228), who examined the volatile MSS components from all-cellulose cigarettes. Many were identified as aldehydes and ketones (1238, 1239). In 1959, Laurene et al. (2310) reported the unequivocal identification of acrolein *
Conversion of cellulose to B[a]P under actual smoking conditions = 0.21 mg/g; conversion of cellulose to B[a]P at 650°C = 0.78 mg/g. Percent ratio for 650°C pyrolysis = 100 × 0.21/0.778 = 27%; for 840°C pyrolysis = 100 × 0.21/288.8 = 0.073%.
in cigarette smoke and cellulose in tobacco was a major precursor of it in smoke. Grob (1413) subsequently demonstrated in 1962 that, during smoking, cellulose generated high levels not only of acrolein but also the ketone 3-buten-2-one. In 1966, Latimer (25A40) reported several aldehydes (acetaldehyde, acrolein) and ketones (acetone, 2-butanone) in the pyrolysate from tobacco-derived starch. At Philip Morris R&D, Gager et al. (1264, 1265) noted from their study with radiolabeled sugars added to cigarette tobacco that acetaldehyde and acetone were formed during the smoking process in the highest yields from added sugars but their levels were reduced because of the levels generated from other major tobacco components, such as cellulose, pectins, and starch. In their 1976 literature review of pyrolysis products from carbohydrates, Roberts et al. (3225) noted that, of the more than 140 compounds identified in the pyrolysates from glucose, fructose, sucrose, cellulose, and starch, twenty-one were aldehydes and thirty were ketones. Of these fifty-one pyrolysis products identified at that time, forty had been identified as cigarette MSS components. In 1977, Ohnishi and Kato (2850) described the identification of several carbonyl compounds in the pyrolysates from the tobacco cell-wall polysaccharides cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectins. They noted that these biopolymeric polysaccharides constituted 30% to 50% of the dry weight of the tobacco they were studying. Sakuma et al. pyrolyzed tobaccoderived cellulose (3401), chlorogenic acid, and rutin (3400) and reported various aldehydes and ketones plus numerous phenols in the pyrolysates. Many of the pyrolysate components identified have also been identified in cigarette MSS.
XXV.C.4 Acids The research findings of Gilbert and Lindsey (1289) on the generation of a variety of PAHs during the pyrolysis of major components of tobacco, including several polycarboxylic acids (oxalic, malic, and citric acids), were discussed previously (see Table XXV-10). These acids may constitute from 3% to 12% of dry tobacco weight (1289, 1329, 1330, 1332, 1333). At RJRT R&D, the fate of these acids during smoking in a cigarette was determined by Newell and Best in studies with radiolabeled acids added individually to cigarette tobacco (2763). In 1967, Schmeltz et al. (3486), in their attempt to define precursors in tobacco of several classes of compounds in cigarette smoke, studied the nature and levels of phenols generated in the pyrolysates of malic, citric, aconitic, and fumaric acids or their sodium salts. Thus, pyrolysis of tobacco leaf acids yielded phenols (3486) and PAHs (1289). Although direct comparison is somewhat difficult because of the 50°C pyrolysis temperature difference in the GilbertLindsey vs. Schmeltz et al. studies, the PAHs appeared to be generated in much lesser amounts per gram of tobacco leaf acid pyrolyzed than were the phenols. Table XXV-14 summarizes data obtained from the studies. Pyrolysate products obtained from several short-chained aliphatic acids or their sodium salts were examined. Schmeltz and Schlotzhauer (3498) pyrolyzed sodium acetate at 500°C
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1129
11/13/08 5:56:33 PM
1130
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-14 Pyrolysis of Leaf Acids: Generation of Selected Phenols and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Compound Generated, ng/mg of Acid Pyrolyzed
Pyrolysis Conditions T, °C
Atm.
Acid Pyrolyzed Malic
Citric
Oxalic
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons [Gilbert and Lindsey (1289)] Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene
650 650
N2 N2
1.30 0.33
0.35 0.17
0 0.01
N2 N2 N2
89 79 79
25 38 51
NDa ND ND
Phenols [Schmeltz et al. (3486) Phenol o-Cresol m-Cresol + p-Cresol a
700 700 700
ND = not determined
and 800°C. The 800°C pyrolysate was much more complex than that produced at 500°C. This was true for the numbers of pyrolysate components generated and those with aromatic structures. Among the latter were several alkylbenzenes and phenols. Rudenko and Konsinska (25A61) reported similar findings from their pyrolysis of propionic acid, present in tobacco in bound form. At the USDA, Geisinger et al. (1279) demonstrated that pyrolysis of malic and lactic acids at temperatures from 500°C to 900°C (in 100°C increments) yielded both aromatic hydrocarbons and phenols. With malic acid, the aromatic hydrocarbon complexity increased (increased methylation) as the temperature increased. Bicyclic indene was the only PAH detected in the 500°C and 600°C pyrolysates. Indene and naphthalene were detected in the 700°C pyrolysate. Tricyclic acenaphthylene, anthracene, phenanthrene, and fluorene were detected in the 800°C pyrolysate, tetracyclic pyrene and chrysene in the 900°C pyrolysate. Pyrolytic products from several aromatic acids present either free or bound in tobacco were investigated, for example, Zane and Wender (4403) demonstrated in 1963 that pyrolysis of rutin, quercetin, and chlorogenic acid (tobacco polyphenols with bound caffeic acid) yielded catechol as the major product, alkylcatechols, resorcinol plus several furancarboxaldehydes. Similar results were reported by the USDA group (3462) at Athens, Georgia. In 1969, Jones and Schmeltz reported catechol as the major pyrolysis product (32%) from free caffeic acid (1981) and stilbene as the major pyrolysis product from trans-cinnamic acid (1983). trans-Cinnamic acid pyrolysate also contained low yields of several bicyclic and tricyclic PAHs. The results of these and similar pyrolysis studies with tobacco acids were reviewed by Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722). Indirect evidence that major leaf acids such as malic, citric, and oxalic acids in tobacco contributed low PAH levels to pyrolysates from tobacco fractions was provided by Severson et al. (3616). When tobacco was extracted with hexane or petroleum ether, the bulk of these acids did not appear in
the extract but remained in the insoluble tobacco residue. Severson et al. reported that the pyrolysate from the extractables (8% of tobacco weight) contained more than twice the amount of total PAHs than did the pyrolysate from residual tobacco (92% of tobacco weight). In the same study, Severson et al. (3616) examined the levels of various PAHs (bicyclic to pentacycylic) in the pyrolysates of eight chromatographic fractions from the petroleum ether extractables. Several fractions consisted primarily of free fatty acid mixtures, such as myristic, palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic acids (fractions F-5 and F-6) and esters of long-chained saturated and unsaturated alcohols with these acids (fractions F-7 and F-8, see Table XXV-8). As described previously, Schmeltz et al. (3511) demonstrated that less than 1% of radiolabeled palmitic acid, isolated from tobacco grown in a radiolabeled-CO2 atmosphere and added to cigarette tobacco filler, was converted to PAHs during the smoking process. Pyrolysis products from esters such as ethyl acetate and isobutyl acetate, both possible flavorants for tobacco smoking products, have been reported [Leffingwell et al. (2341), Miyagawa (2563)]. The principal pyrolysis products from both acetates were CO, CO2, methane, acetic acid, and acetone. Isobutyl acetate yielded isobutylene as a major product. Products from pyrolysis of the esters formed from long-chained fatty acids* and glycerol (triglycerides) were described by Higman et al. (1646) (tripalmitin, tristearin) and Kitamura (2111a) (trilaurin, tripalmitin). In the early 1970s, Halaby and Fagerson (25A28) pyrolyzed palmitic, oleic, and linoleic acids plus their triglycerides. Numerous PAHs were identified in the pyrolysates. They reported that B[a]P was generated from each acid and from each triglyceride at about 100 ppm of the compound pyrolyzed. In their studies on precursors in tobacco of PAHs in tobacco smoke, Rodgman and Cook (3269) demonstrated that addition of 0.4% (4.0 mg/g of tobacco) of trimyristin to tobacco produced, under actual smoking conditions, a 6% increase in total PAHs in the MSS. The changes in individual PAH yields are shown in Table XXV-15. These changes are also expressed in Table XXV-15 in terms of the conversion (ng/mg or ppm) of the added trimyristin to individual PAHs. The changes observed in the levels of individual PAHs are well within the experimental error for PAH analyses in the late 1950s.
XXV.C.5 Proteins and Amino Acids Amino acids, both as free acids and as acids bound within protein molecules, are present in all of the tobacco types (flue-cured, burley, Oriental, and Maryland). The diversity and levels of amino acids in various tobaccos have been *
The major long-chained fatty acids, either free or bound, in tobacco are lauric acid (C12), myristic acid (C14), palmitic acid (C16), stearic acid (C18), oleic acid (C18, 1 carbon-carbon double bond), linoleic acid (C18, 2 carboncarbon double bonds), and linolenic acid (C18, 3 carbon-carbon double bonds). However, bound and free acids in tobacco (and in tobacco smoke) are not limited to acids with even-numbered carbon chains [Bellin (258, 259), Rodgman et al. (3294), Swain and Stedman (3842, 25A72), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1130
11/13/08 5:56:34 PM
1131
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-15 Conversion of Trimyristin Added to Tobacco to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons during Actual Cigarette Smoking (3269) Mainstream Smoke Delivery of PAH, µg/cig, at Trimyristin Addition Level to Tobacco Blend, mg/g Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Naphthalenes a Anthracene Pyrene Fluoranthene Chrysene Benzo[a]pyrene
PAH Increase
0
4.0
In ng/4.0 mg of Trimyristin Added
15.8 b 0.247 0.051 0.213 0.018 0.081
17.7 b 0.255 0.045 0.207 0.018 0.086
1900 8c 6c (6) c 0c 5c
In ng/mgd of Trimyristin Added 475 2 1.5 0 0 1.25
Naphthalenes represent a mixture of naphthalene plus several methyl-, dimethyl-, and trimethylnaphthalenes. Micrograms produced per gram of tobacco burned. c Within experimental error of analytical procedure. d ng/mg = parts per million (ppm) a
b
presented by Gori (1329, 1330) and Tso and Chaplin (3975). The amino acids occurring free and/or bound in tobaccos include alanine, α-aminobutyric acid, arginine, aspartic acid, cystine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, ornithine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and valine. The presence in cigarette MSS of numerous free amino acids and amino acid-derived compounds was demonstrated in the mid-1950s. This occurred soon after the publication of the results of several cigarette smoke-related epidemiological and biological studies led to a massive escalation in tobacco smoke composition studies; for example, Buyske et al. (562) identified glutamic acid and its derivative glutamine (glutamic acid 5-amide) in tobacco smoke. Other amino acids identified in tobacco smoke [see Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884)] include alanine, aspartic acid (and asparagine), cysteine, glycine, leucine, ornithine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, and valine. In the early 1960s, pyrocoll (dipyrrolo[a,d]pyrazine-5, 10-dione) was identified in cigarette MSS by Mold et al. (2592), who proposed that either free or bound proline was its precursor. During their study of the isolation and identification of N-heterocyclic components (the indoles and carbazoles) in cigarette MSS, Rodgman and Cook (3279) confirmed the presence of pyrocoll. Two decades earlier, Van Order and Linwall (25A78) had demonstrated that dry distillation of tryptophan yielded indole and 3-methylindole (skatole), both of which were subsequently identified in tobacco smoke (3279) and in burley tobacco by Roberts [see citation in Rodgman and Cook (3279)]. From their pyrolysis studies (850°C, N2) with lysine, leucine, and tryptophan, Patterson et al. (2902) reported that each yielded the N-heterocyclic compounds indole, quinoline, isoquinoline, several nitriles, and PAHs ranging from bicyclic to tetracyclic (see Table XXV-16). B[a]P was found
only in the leucine pyrolysate. From their own findings and from a previous report by Jarboe and Rosene (1923a) that quinoline and isoquinoline were components of a nicotine pyrolysate, Patterson et al. suggested that the precursors in tobacco of quinoline and isoquinoline in tobacco smoke might be nicotine and/or the amino acids. They also reported that tryptophan, per mole pyrolyzed, yielded a phenol fraction weighing about five times that generated from lysine and about thirty times that from leucine. Patterson et al. (2903) reported the effect of temperature on the pyrolysate composition from phenylalanine, with emphasis on PAHs yields, and the effect of tryptophan or pyrrole on the pyrolysate composition when equimolar quantities of phenylalanine + tryptophan or phenylalanine + pyrrole were pyrolyzed (see summary of results in Table XXV-17). The difference between the pyrogenesis of PAHs from phenylalanine and equimolar quantities of phenylalanine + tryptophan mixture prompted Patterson et al. (2903) to propose amino acid addition to tobacco to control the PAH content of the CSC: These results suggest the possibility that aromatic hydrocarbon content of tobacco “tar” may be affected by the amino acid composition of the tobacco and that it might be possible to affect deliberately the amount of aromatics and bases formed by adding suitable additives, such as amino acids, to the tobacco.
In 1971 when Patterson et al. made this suggestion, the presence in amino acid pyrolysates of the N-heterocyclic amines and the inordinately high mutagenicity of several of them were unknown. Higman et al. (1647) reported the generation of PAHs, phenols, pyridines, indole, quinoline, and other aromatic bases during pyrolysis of tobacco amino acids and proteins [see the review on pyrogenesis of smoke components by Chortyk and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1131
11/13/08 5:56:34 PM
1132
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-16 Components in Pyrolysates from Lysine, Leucine, and Tryptophan (2902) Yield, mg/mole of Amino Acid Pyrolyzed Lysine a
Leucine
Tryptophan
Nitrogen Compounds Hydrogen cyanide Aniline Quinoline Isoquinoline Benzonitrile o-Tolunitrile m-Tolunitrile p-Tolunitrile Phenylacetonitrile Indole 1-Naphthonitrile 2-Naphthonitrile
+b 60 160 80 470 30 30 20 6 20 10 —
+ 5 8 6 40 + 30 + — + 30 —
+ — 17.7 2.4 1370 610 + + 400 610 350 170
Cyclic Hydrocarbons Styrene Biphenyl Bibenzyl Indene Naphthalene Naphthalene, 1-methylNaphthalene, 2-methylAcenaphthene Acenaphthylene Fluorene Anthracene/phenanthrene Fluoranthene Pyrene Pyrene, methylBenzofluorene Chrysene Criphenylene Benz[a]anthracene Benzopyrene
5 10 2 40 210 10 10 20 30 10 30 10 10 2 10 10 + + —
20 30 — 70 620 40 50 — 19 80 250 90 110 20 30 50 + + 30
— + + — 1100 + — — 3 140 7900 210 270 — 150 110 + + —
Pyrolysate Component
a b
Pyrolyzed as lysine monohydrochloride + indicates the presence of compound; — indicates the absence of the compound.
Schlotzhauer (722)]. The results reported by Higman et al. are summarized in Table XXV-18. Tryptophan was found to be the precursor in tobacco of harman (1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole) and norharman (9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole) in tobacco smoke, compounds originally identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke by Poindexter and Carpenter (2972). That tryptophan was indeed a precursor in tobacco of the harmans in smoke was demonstrated by addition of radiolabeled tryptophan to tobacco and identification of radiolabeled harman and norharman in the MSS. More recent amino acid pyrolysis studies led to the isolation and identification of several N-heterocyclic amines reported not only to be tumorigenic to mouse skin but also to show inordinately high mutagenicity [Ames bioassay
(Salmonella typhimurium]. Initial impetus for amino acid pyrolyses was not the definition of the relationship between tobacco precursors and smoke components but the observation that extracts of broiled, fried, or roasted foodstuffs were highly mutagenic (Ames bioassay). These N-heterocyclic amines, derived from amino acids and/or proteins in heated foodstuffs, were defined as “cooked food” mutagens. These studies in the 1970s on the tumorigenicity and mutagenicity of extracts of cooked foodstuffs are reminiscent of the studies in the 1920s by Kennaway (2073–2076), who reported the tumorigenicity of extracts of heated foodstuffs or pyrolysates from compounds such as cholesterol, and by Roffo (25A56, 25A57, 25A58), who reported the tumorigenicity of pyrolyzed cholesterol. Subsequently, pyrolysates from many foodstuffs and cholesterol were shown to contained various PAHs, including B[a]P. Identification of highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic compounds in amino acid pyrolysates was followed by their identification not only in heated foodstuffs but also in mainstream CSC. In 1977, Sugimura et al. (3829) reported the identification of the potent mutagens 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (Trp-P-2) and 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (Trp-P-1) in tryptophan pyrolysate. The next year, Yamamota et al. (4365a) identified two potent mutagens in glutamic acid pyrolysate: aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) and 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole (Glu-P-1). Table XXV-19 lists several N-heterocyclic amines that exhibit high mutagenicity in the Ames bioassay, are amino acid pyrolysis products, and have been identified in heated foodstuffs and CSC (3828c). On a per microgram basis, B[a] P in the Ames bioassay with Salmonella typhimurium (TA 98 strain) shows about 200 revertants/µg. Several of the amino acid-derived compounds in Table XXV-19 exceed the B[a] P effect (TA 98 strain) by factors ranging from about 10 to over 2100. Yoshida and Matsumoto (4387a) reported the identification of two α-carbolines in CSC: 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole (AαC) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAαC). These and several other compounds were reported in CSC by Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368). The quantitative levels of the possibly amino acid-derived, mutagenic N-heterocyclics in CSC are shown in Table XXV-19. In their studies they emphasized in particular the identification and quantitation of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) because of its inordinately high mutagenicity (433000 and 490000 revertants/µg in the Ames bioassay, Salmonella typhimurium strain TA 98). Demonstration of the mutagenicity of the compounds in Table XXV-19 was followed by demonstration of their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals. Ohgaki et al. (2849a) demonstrated the tumorigenicity of IQ in mice. Takayama et al. (3862c) and Tanaka et al. (3865c) reported its tumorigenicity in rats. Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2 were reported to be tumorigenic in mice by Matsukura et al. (2491a) and in rats by Hosaka et al. (1835a) and Takayama et al. (3862d). Ohgaki et al. (2849b) reported that Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, AαC, and MeAαC were
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1132
11/13/08 5:56:36 PM
1133
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-17 Pyrolysis of Phenylalanine. A. Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature B. Effect of Equimolar Addition of Tryptophan (Try) or Pyrrole (Pyr) (2903) Material Pyrolyzed Phenylalanine (Phe) Pyrolyzed at Pyrolysate Component a
450°C
Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Biphenyl — Bibenzyl 10300
650°C
850°C
950°C
Phe
Phe + Try b
Phe + Pyrc
850°C
850°C
850°C
1270 12000
10300 2550
4360 +
10300 2550
2980 —
2240 345
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Indene — Naphthalene 120 Naphthalene, 1-methyl— Naphthalene, 2-methyl— Acenaphthene — Acenaphthylene — Fluorene 425 Phenanthrene/anthracene 4120 Benzofluorene — Fluoranthene — Pyrene — Pyrene, methyl— Chrysenes —
360 1450 + — 485 1700 1330 9700 485 485 3500 — 485
2,730 3500 — — 1940 2550 4500 20000 1940 1270 3200 3200 2550
— 1270 — — <180 730 850 7900 2600 600 1200 <600 1580
2730 3500 — — 1940 2550 4,500 20000 1940 1270 3200 3200 2550
— 3525 — 2980 54 400 780 1440 220 160 300 220 160
170 5600 730 345 86 990 650 2410 390 40 390 + 300
N-Containing Compounds Benzonitrile o-Tolunitrile m-Tolunitrile p-Tolunitrile Phenylacetonitrile 1-Naphthonitrile Indole Quinoline Isoquinoline
850 360 60 180 1400 1400 2300 1800 3000
7880 2850 — 180 — — 725 12000 10900
1270 60 60 — — — — 300 180
7880 2850 — 180 — — 725 12000 10900
3800 680 1380 380 220 1140 17350 25750 1100
1465 260 260 260 130 1000 860 1300 430
1270 — — — — — — — —
Yield of pyrolysis component in µg/g of compound or mixture pyrolyzed. Pyrolysis involved equimolar quantities of phenylalanine and tryptophan (total mol. wt. = 369). c Pyrolysis involved equimolar quantities of phenylalanine and pyrrole (total mol. wt. = 232). a
b
tumorigenic in mice, and Takayama et al. (3862b) reported Glu-P-1 and Glu-P-2 to be tumorigenic in rats. Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) discussed the amino acidderived aromatic amines in cigarette smoke: Of the known carcinogenic pyrolysis products of the amino acids, so far only 2-amino-3-methylimidazo(4,5-f)quinoline has been detected in trace amounts of 0.26 ng in the smoke of a Japanese filter cigarette [Yamashita et al. (4368)].
Apparently, Hoffmann and Hecht had overlooked not only the reports of the identification in CSC of several other known “carcinogenic” pyrolysis products of amino acids, for example, AaC and MeAaC [Yoshida and Matsumoto (4387a)] or Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2 [Yamashita et al. (4367)] but also the reports on their tumorigenicity in several animal species [Matsukura et al. (2491a), Hosaka et al. (1835a), Ohgaki et al. (2849a, 2849b), Takayama et al. (3862c, 3862d), Tanaka et al. (3865c)].
Table XXV-20 summarizes the MSS yields of N-heterocyclic amines considered to be significant tumorigens [Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741)] plus the assessment of the IARC (1870) on their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals and humans. Table XXV-21 illustrates precursor relationships, either demonstrated or proposed, between N-containing components such as the amino acids and proteins and tobacco smoke components. The tabulation of possible flavorants for tobacco smoking products by Leffingwell et al. (2341) included contributions to tobacco smoke taste and aroma of twenty-three amino acids added individually to the cigarette filler. During tobacco growth, curing, aging, and/or the smoking process, tobacco sugars may react with ammonia and/ or amino acids to yield Amadori compounds which, when heated during the smoking process, will generate a variety of pyrazines [Green et al. (1369)]. Many pyrazines identified in tobacco smoke are highly flavorful and contribute uniquely
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1133
11/13/08 5:56:37 PM
1134
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-18 Components in Pyrolysates from Amino Acids (Proline and Glycine) and Proteins (Casein and Collagen) (1647) Pyrolysate Component
Amino Acid or Protein Casein
Collagen
Proline
Glycine
Nitrogen Compounds Hydrogen cyanide Pyridine Pyridine, 2-methylPyridine, 3-methylPyridine, 4-methylPyridine, 3-vinylAniline Pyrrole Quinoline Isoquinoline Indole Benzonitrile o-Tolunitrile m-Tolunitrile
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + — + + + + + — + +
+ + + + + — — + — — — + — —
Cyclic Hydrocarbons Benzene Toluene Styrene Xylenes Indene Naphthalene Fluorene
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + — — — — —
— + + + + — —
Phenols Phenol o-Cresol m-Cresol p-Cresol Phenol, ethylXylenol
+ + + + + +
+ — + + + +
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
a
indicates the presence of compound; — indicates the absence of the + compound. In the publication by Higman et al. (1647), actual pyrolysis yield data are listed for each compound.
to the aroma and taste not only of tobacco smoke but also of a variety of consumer food products such as coffee, tea, cocoa, roasted peanuts, and roasted, broiled, or fried meats, poultry, and fish [Maga and Sizer (2439)].
XXV.D Tobacco Additives XXV.D.1 Additives Used in Tobacco Production Much information exists in the tobacco literature on the use and levels of use of a various materials added to tobacco during growth, harvesting, and storage and on such materials that either remain unchanged on the tobacco as residual material or are chemically altered. These materials include insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, fumigants, and sucker
growth inhibitors (see Chapter XXI). Acceptable use levels of these are prescribed in the United States by appropriate government agencies. Comments, for example, see Wynder and Hoffmann* (4332), Guthrie (1457), and Guthrie and Sheets (1460) on the use of pesticides, etc., were published in increasing numbers, after the mid-1960s when smoke components or classes of components allegedly responsible for the effects of cigarette smoke in the smoke-disease association could not explain the observed effects at the levels in cigarette smoke. Two types of materials have been examined in greater detail than most of the others. These are discussed in this section because there is substantial information on their pyrolysis products, their transfer per se from cigarette tobacco to its MSS, their degradation during the actual smoking process, and/or their effect as either transferred or degraded materials on the biological activity. Even in these two cases, no attempt has been made to include all the available references. These classes of materials include: Sucker growth inhibitors: Representative sucker growth inhibitors or suckering agents include maleic hydrazide, currently used as an alkali metal salt, and the normal, even-numbered carbon chain saturated alcohols, ranging in carbon chain length from (C6) 1-hexanol through C12 (1-dodecanol) (4332). Pesticides: Particularly those pesticides that are chlorinated; for example, DDT, Aldrin®, and Dieldrin® (4332). XXV.D.1.a Sucker Growth Inhibitors The pyrolysis of long-chained saturated alcohols such as 1-docosanol and long-chained unsaturated alcohols such as phytol and solanesol, known to be naturally occurring components of tobacco, was discussed previously. One of the most widely used and effective commercial preparations for inhibition of sucker growth is “Off-Shoot-T®,” a mixture consisting primarily of the even-numbered straightchained alcohols 1-hexanol, 1-octanol, 1-decanol, and 1-dodecanol [Collins et al. (25A16)]. Pyrolysis studies by Higman et al. (1644, 1645) with individual alcohols of “Off-Shoot-T®” revealed that much of the alcohol was transferred intact to the pyrolysate. Much of the remainder was converted to the corresponding alkene; for example, 1-decanol yielded 1-decene. Because of their volatility and low molecular weight, conversion of the alcohols to PAHs was minimal. Definitive evidence that the alcohol sucker growth inhibitors added to tobacco did not augment the tumorigenicity of cigarette MSS was provided in the second set of experimental cigarettes studied in the NCI “Less Hazardous” Cigarette *
It should be noted that, in their earlier review, Wynder and Hoffmann (4319) discussed pesticide-derived arsenic in tobacco and tobacco smoke, but they did not discuss tobacco production additives such as sucker growth inhibitors, pesticides, etc., and their effects on tobacco and tobacco smoke properties.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1134
11/13/08 5:56:38 PM
1135
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-19 Amino Acid-Derived N-Heterocylic Amines Compound Code
Mutagenicitya, rev/µg
Name
IQ
Imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, 2-amino-3-methyl-
Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2 Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 AaC MeAaC
5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole, 2-amino-6-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole, 2-amino9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino-3-methyl-
a b
TA 98
TA 100
Level in CSC, ng/cig b
433000 490000 39000 104200 49000 1900 300 200
7000
0.26
1700 1800 3200 1200 20 120
0.29-0.48 0.82-1.1 0.37-0.89 0.25-0.88 25-260 2-37
Salmonella typhimurium, strain TA 98 or TA 100, with S-9 mix. See Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741).
Program (1330, 2683). The chemical and biological properties of the MSSs from three samples (hand-suckered tobacco, tobacco treated with the recommended level of alcohol sucker growth inhibitor, and tobacco treated with 100 times the recommended level) were compared among themselves and with the Standard Experimental Blend, SEB II. Data obtained are shown in Table XXV-22. Examination of the data indicates that neither the normal use level of the alcohol nor a use level 100 times normal had any significant adverse effect on the mainstream CSC properties. The MSS phenol yields were increased from the hand-suckered and both alcohol-treated tobacco samples, but the increase elevation had no significant effect on the CSC biological properties. The results were described by Gori (1330):
In the summary report (2683) on the four sets of NCI Tobacco Working Group (TWG) experimental cigarettes, this statement was expanded: The fatty alcohol, fatty alcohol × 100, and hand-suckered blends showed no significant differences among themselves or from the SEB II blend.
It is interesting to note that biological responses (% TBA), ranging from a high of the average of 48% for the four replicate SEB II CSCs to a low of 36% for the CSC from the sample treated with alcohol at the normal use level, were considered to show “no significant difference.” Maleic hydrazide, another growth inhibitor used as a suckering agent on tobacco, is used in the United States as its potassium salt. Prior to 1982, use on tobacco involved application of maleic hydrazide as its diethanolamine salt. Such use was banned in 1981 by the
No statistically significant differences were observed among Hand-suckered, Fatty Alcohol-Normal and Fatty Alcohol x 100 Blends (variables 60, 61, and 62).
Table XXV-20 Summary of Lists of Tumorigenic N-Heterocyclic Amines Identified in Tobacco Smoke IARCa Evaluation of Evidence re Tumorigenicity in Component
Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
OSHA (2825)
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741)
MSS Yield ng/ciga
Laboratory Animals
Humans
— — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
+ + + + + + + + +
0.37-0.89 ng 0.25-0.88 ng 0.29-0.48 ng 0.82-1.1 ng 25-260 ng 2-37 ng 0.26 ng 11-23 ng 0.26 ng
sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient
— — — — — — probable possible probable
Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2 AaC MeAaC IQ PhIP IQ a
Data from Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1741)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1135
11/13/08 5:56:39 PM
1136
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-21 Precursor Relationships between N-Containing Tobacco Leaf Components and Tobacco Smoke Components Code pyrocoll
AaC MeAaC norharman harman
Trp-P-2 Trp-P-1 IQ Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2
Component
Demonstrated or Proposed Precursor
Tryptophan Dipyrrolo[a,d]pyrazine-5,10-dione 9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole 9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-pentyl9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-(2-methyl-propyl)9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-amino-3-methyl9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole 9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-methyl9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-ethyl9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-propenyl9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-butyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1-methyl5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole, 3-amino-1,4-dimethylImidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, 2-amino-3-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole, 2-amino-6-methylDipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole, 2-aminoIndole
Indole, 3-acetonitrile Indole, 2,3-dimethylIndole, 1-methylIndole, 3-methylQuinoline
Isoquinoline
Biological Activity Tumorigen
Mutagen
Cocarcinogen
Anticarcinogen
trp prol trp trp trp trp trp trp trp trp trp trp trp trp trp creat (?) glut glut trp lys leuc trp trp trp trp trp lys leuc
— — — — — — yes yes — — — — — yes yes yes yes yes
— — — — — — yes yes yes yes ? ? ? yes yes yes yes yes
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — yes
a
yes — — yes
— — yes — —
yes — — — —
trp lys leuc
—
—
—
—
Acetonitrile has been designated as a mutagen precursor. Abbreviations: trp = tryptophan; prol = proline; lys = lysine; leuc = leucine; creat = creatinine; glut = glutamic acid
a
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1147) soon after it was reported that tobacco treated with it generated N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) during smoking. NDELA was subsequently reported to be a potent, tissuespecific tumorigen in laboratory animals [see Hoffmann et al. (1696) and references therein]. Over the years, the pyrolysis of maleic hydrazide has been much studied, for example, by Patterson et al. (2907), Smith et al. (3728), Harke et al. (1507), and Clough et al. (25A13). Also studied has been its transfer (estimated at ≤4%) as intact maleic hydrazide from tobacco to cigarette MSS [Haeberer (1470), Liu and Hoffmann (2383, 2384)] and its generation of hydrazine during smoking (2385). However, in his 1979 report, the U.S. Surgeon General (4005) noted that maleic hydrazide was not a significant precursor of either hydrazine or 1,1-dimethylhydrazine in cigarette smoke. Smith et al. (3728) reported that the pyrolysis of maleic hydrazide at 600°C
yielded CO2 (24%), CO (2%), HCN (3%), NH3 (9%), and N2 (3%), hydrazine (trace), and a black residue (50%), structure unknown, whose empirical formula was C15H15N5O2. In the fourth set of experimental cigarettes in the NCI “Less Hazardous” Cigarette Program, the chemical and biological (mouse skin-painting bioassay) properties of mainstream CSC from a “pesticide”-treated tobacco cigarette were compared to those of the CSC from a control cigarette, SEB IV (1333, 2683). Gori (1333) listed the pesticides, sucker growth inhibitors, etc., used and described the chemical analyses and bioassays of the pesticide-treated and control tobaccos and their MSSs. Among the additives used in the treatment of the “pesticide”-treated tobacco were maleic hydrazide (MH-30), a 10-carbon alcohol (“Contak®”), and DDT. Because both maleic hydrazide and DDT were on the tobacco, the chemical and biological results from the MSSs from these samples are discussed later.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1136
11/13/08 5:56:40 PM
1137
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-22 NCI Study (Second Set of Experimental Cigarettes): Effect of Long Chained Alcohols Sucker Growth Inhibitors on Cigarette Smoke Properties (1330, 2683) Code No.
Cigarette Filler
Phenol, µg/g of CSCa
PAH, µg/g of CSC
% TBAd at Daily CSC Dose of
B[a]Ab
B[a]Pc
25 mg
50 mg
42 43 44 45
SEB II SEB II SEB II SEB II Avg. (Code Nos. 42-45)
3.83 3.66 3.90 3.81 3.80
1.08 0.89 0.90 0.86 0.93
0.58 0.82 0.79 0.65 0.71
50 52 41 47 47.5
54 40 49 50 48
60 61 62
Hand-suckered Alcohole level: normal application rate Alcohol level: 100 times normal application rate
4.42 4.46 4.83
0.89 0.73 0.79
0.73 0.50 0.51
54 43 49
45 36 41
CSC = cigarette smoke condensate B[a]A = benz[a]anthracene c B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene d TBA = tumor-bearing animals e Alcohol = long-chained alcohols in sucker inhibiting reagent a
b
XXV.D.1.b Pesticides As mentioned in earlier chapters, the biological response observed in mice skin painted with CSC or its fractions cannot be explained on the basis of the identified components and their levels in the CSC. In an attempt to define the biological response, Wynder and Hoffmann fractionated CSC and determined that the major part of the tumorigenicity that could be accounted for (only a few percent) arose from a PAH-rich fraction designated as fraction B [Wynder and Hoffmann (4332, 4342), Hoffmann and Wynder (1798, 1800)]. In addition to thirty-nine PAHs, totally or partially identified, among which were several known to be mouse-skin tumorigens, fraction B contained twenty-seven N-heterocyclic compounds (indoles, carbazoles, and acridans), five O-heterocyclic compounds (dibenzofurans), and six chlorinated compounds that were either insecticides (DDD, DDT) or their chlorinated derivatives (trans-4,4’-dichlorostilbene) [Hoffmann and Wynder (1800)]. According to Hoffmann and Wynder (1800), trans-4,4’-dichlorostilbene (DCS) is one of the major pyrolysis products of the most important tobacco insecticides DDT and DDD. They also stated: DCS is neither a complete carcinogen nor a tumor initiator, nor a tumor promoter, but the DCS (0.3%) can accelerate significantly the tumorigenicity of a BaP solution (0.003%) when both agents are applied concurrently.
However, it should be noted that the use in tobacco culture of chlorinated insecticides such as DDD and DDT in the United States was discontinued in the late 1960s. For example, between 1968 and 1974, the residual DDT levels per gram of U.S. flue-cured tobacco decreased rapidly and substantially (over 200-fold) as follows: 1968, 52 μg/g; 1970, 6 μg/g; 1974, 0.23 μg/g [USPHS (4005), IARC (1870)]. From 1967 through 1973, the organochlorine-containing pesticides such as DDT and TDE were subjected to detailed
examination not only for their contribution to cigarette MSS composition by direct transfer and/or degradation to simpler compounds during the smoking process but also to the composition of their pyrolysates. Investigators involved included Nesemann et al. (1968) from BAT (West Germany), Hoffmann et al. (1756, 1767) from the Sloan Kettering Institute and American Health Foundation, Carpenter and Frost (606) from Carreras Tobacco, Chopra and colleagues from North Carolina A&T [Chopra and Osborne (709, 25A12), Chopra and Domanski (707), Chopra et al. (708), Chopra and Thekkekandam (713, 714)] and Kennedy et al. (25A36) from Mississippi State. Chopra and Osborne (709) initially studied the pyrolysis of p,p′-DDT to identify degradation products. They compared the pyrolysis data with those from actual smoking studies and commented on the differences observed: There are two differences in the pyrolysis of DDT reported earlier and the degradation of DDT in tobacco smokes: the concentration of DDT is much greater in the former and hydrogen in the latter. The DDT degradation products as we have found are as would be expected from the difference in the reaction conditions. It is thus possible to predict the fate of a pesticide in tobacco smoke by studying its pyrolysis pattern. Also these investigations show that at the combustion zone hydrogen plays a very important role in the reactions taking place.
Chopra and his colleagues employed these pyrolysis data to identify the transfer and degradation products generated from pesticide-treated tobaccos during the smoking process [Chopra and Domanski (707), Chopra et al. (708), Chopra and Osborne (25A12), Chopra and Thekkekandam (713, 714)]. The results reported indicated the effect of added pesticides on MSS composition primarily in terms of the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1137
11/13/08 5:56:41 PM
1138
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-23 NCI Study (Fourth Set of Experimental Cigarettes): Effect of Pesticides Addition on Cigarette Smoke Properties (1333, 2683) PAH, µg /g of CSC Code No. 04 14 29 32 69 39
Cigarette Filler SEB IV SEB IV SEB IV SEB IV Avge (04,14,29,32) Pesticide-free control Pesticide-treated
% TBAd at Daily CSC Dose of
Phenol, µg/g of CSCa
B[a]Ab
B[a]Pc
12.5 mg
25 mg
3.79 2.98 3.95 3.19 3.48 5.33 6.21
0.99 1.11 0.96 1.55 1.15 1.05 1.21
0.72 0.79 0.71 0.60 0.70 0.83 0.79
24 36 24 27 27.8 34 27
49 56 55 55 53.8 54 43
CSC = cigarette smoke condensate B[a]A = benz[a]anthracene c B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene d TBA = tumor-bearing animals a
b
transfer of intact pesticides from tobacco to smoke or the products generated from them during the smoking process. In the National Cancer Institute (NCI) study of the fourth set of cigarettes (1333, 2683), the effect of added pesticides on chemical and biological properties (mouse skin painting) was examined. As noted previously, the “pesticides” included the sucker growth inhibitors maleic hydrazide (MH-30) and “Contak®” (1-decanol) in addition to DDT (1333). Other compounds present in the mix used in the tobacco treatment according to government-approved procedures and treatment levels included Lorsban®, Dylox®, Enide®, Lannate®, and Carbaryl®. According to Smith et al. (3727), pyrolysis of Carbaryl® (methyl carbamic acid, 1-naphthyl ester) gave three major products in the pyrolysate: unchanged Carbaryl® (»40%), 1-naphthol, and methyl isocyanate. Some results from the NCI study of the MSS from the “pesticide”-treated tobacco are shown in Table XXV-23. The conclusions were [see p. 29 in (1333)]: Pesticide-Free and Pesticide-Treated Tobaccos: Two cigarettes tested in the fourth experiment were made from tobacco grown [in] Prince Edward Island (PEI) [Canada]. One of the tobaccos was pesticide-free and the other was pesticide-treated … There are no statistically significant differences among the [probability of survival] values at either dose level … Relative condensate yields from these cigarettes are presented … These yields confirm the [probability of survival] values, namely: there is no clear cut difference between the pesticide-free and pesticide-treated tobaccos.
It was also noted in the summary (2683) of the NCI 10-year “Less Hazardous” Cigarette Program: No significant differences were observed between cigarettes made from pesticide-treated tobacco leaves and pesticidefree tobacco leaves.
These findings, at least with respect to the maleic hydrazide added, are in agreement with the comments of Chopra
(704) in his theoretical discussion of the relationships among pyrolysis, maleic hydrazide, the actual smoking of tobacco treated with maleic hydrazide, and B[a]P: Evidence and data so far available on maleic hydrazide are not sufficient to suggest the MH [maleic hydrazide] is a health hazard to the smoker … Thus far it is reasonable to assume that there is not enough data or justification to consider the use of MH as a health hazard to the smoker.
In the late 1970s, two excellent reviews on reagents used to treat tobacco and their effects on tobacco chemistry were authored by Steffens (3911a) and by Sheets and Leidy (3634). The latter review included considerable information on the effect of such compounds added to tobacco on MSS composition. Sheets and Leidy (3634) summarized the data, which indicated the gradual decline in the levels on tobacco of insecticides such as DDT following the government’s proscription of their use on tobacco (and other crops) in the United States. Their summary is similar to that provided earlier by Guthrie (1457) on the gradual decline of the tobacco arsenic level following the discontinuance in 1952 of arsenate use on tobacco. By 1968, the arsenic level in U.S. tobacco had decreased from a 1951 level of ≈50 μg/g of tobacco (dry weight) to 0.5–1.0 μg/g [USPHS (4005), IARC (1870)]. In 1975, Griffin et al. (1391) reported arsenic values of 0.5 to 0.9 μg/g for U.S. tobaccos. A pesticide used to control cigarette beetles in stored tobaccos and tobacco products was methoprene (Altosid®) or in the formulation Kabat®. The use of the well-studied methoprene (5-isopropyl(2E,4E)-11-methoxy-3,7,11-trimethyl-2,4-dodecadienoate) escalated markedly in the 1990s. Methoprene is also acceptable for controlling pests on various foodstuffs as well as mosquito larvae in water supplies. Using radiolabeled methoprene in a cigarette, Frisch et al. (1242, 1243) reported that 38.2% to 39.4% of the activity was found in the MSS, 52.3% to 52.4% in the sidestream smoke (SSS), and 8.1% to 8.4% in
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1138
11/13/08 5:56:41 PM
1139
Pyrolysis
the 23-mm butt. Of the activity in the MSS, 96.8% was due to methoprene transferred from the treated tobacco. Of 1.3% total activity found in mainstream vapor phase, 86% consisted of radioactive CO plus CO2; the remaining 14% of the activity was distributed among ten vapor-phase components, all normally found as vapor-phase components of cigarette MSS.
XXV.D.2 Additives Used in Cigarette Manufacture The pyrolysate compositions from various tobacco additives, including casing materials and humectants, and their effect on cigarette MSS composition and properties were described by Roberts et al. (3225, 3226) and by Schumacher (3551). In this section, additional data are discussed. XXV.D.2.a Casing Materials (Sugars, Cocoa, Licorice) Casing materials used in cigarette products in the United States are licorice, cocoa, and the sugars, including the invert sugars (glucose plus levulose) and sucrose. Although they did not discuss the topic in their 1964 review (4319), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) did discuss the possible effects on cigarette MSS properties of inclusion of casing materials in the tobacco filler with particular emphasis on licorice because of its glycyrrhizin content. Glycyrrhizin, the potassium and calcium salt of glycyrrhizic acid, is polycyclic, with five cyclohexane rings in the picene configuration. (Figure XXV-2). Picene is a PAH identified in several pyrolysates by Badger et al. (142) and Kröller (2195) and in CSC by Snook et al. (3756). According to an assertion by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), glycyrrhizin in licorice added to tobacco could be a precursor of PAHs in smoke. In an ill-defined experiment, Hoffmann et al. (1766) compared the B[a]P yield in the MSS from pipe tobacco (containing 30% casing materials, including licorice, level unspecified) smoked in a pipe (2 puff/min) with the B[a]P level in the MSS from cigarette tobacco (no licorice added) smoked identically, that is, in a pipe. The B[a]P levels were 27 and 10.5 μg/100 g of tobacco smoked, respectively. Later, Hoffmann and Rathkamp (1754) stated that the pyrolysis of licorice yielded PAHs. This finding was subsequently confirmed by Green and Best (1356, 1357), whose data on B[a]P generated during identical pyrolyses of licorice and flue-cured tobacco are summarized in Table XXV-24. They also identified thirty-five other compounds in the licorice pyrolysate [Green and Best (1356, 1357), all of which had previously been identified in cigarette MSS. Ten
Table XXV-24 Pyrolysis of Licorice vs. Flue-Cured Tobacco: Benzo[a]pyrene Generation Material Pyrolyzed Licorice Flue-cured tobacco
Benzo[a]pyrene
Pyrolysate wt., mg/g Pyrolyzed
Total, ng
ng/mg of Pyrolysate
117 133
24.8 70.5
0.21 0.53
of the licorice pyrolysate components were phenols; four were dimethyl- or trimethylnaphthalenes. Many of the compounds identified in licorice are the same as those identified in tobacco (3551, 3555). Thus, there will be similarities in their contributions to the composition of either pyrolysates from licorice vs. tobacco or the MSSs from a licorice-containing vs. a licorice-free tobacco blend. Differences will be reflected by the components unique to the material being investigated, for example, glycyrrhizin in licorice, theobromine in cocoa, and nicotine in tobacco. As noted by Schumacher et al. (3555), 172 (83%) of the 209 components identified in licorice by 1981 had also been identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Later, a similar situation between cocoa composition and tobacco/tobacco smoke compositions will be discussed. Sakuma et al. (25A62) reported the pyrolysis products from several naturally occurring polyphenols (chlorogenic acid, rutin). Rutin is a major polyphenol in both licorice and different tobacco types. It and chlorogenic acid yield substantial levels of catechol and substituted catechols on pyrolysis. All the identified volatile pyrolysis products from rutin have been identified in cigarette MSS. In the late 1970s, Harllee and Leffingwell (1512, 1513) cataloged cocoa components identified to that date with particular emphasis on the volatile, flavorful components common to cocoa and tobacco or its smoke. Both tobacco and tobacco smoke, as well as cocoa, contain numerous fatty acid triglycerides (1512) and many of the same fatty acids (1512). At least nineteen amino acids are common to cocoa and tobacco (1512). Of 352 volatile components identified in cocoa by 1979, 209 (59%) had also been identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke (1513). From his pyrolysis study on cocoa, Schlotzhauer (3447) reported that his results suggested: Cocoa powder added as tobacco flavorant would not significantly increase the phenol yield of smoke, but may affect the higher fatty acid content.
Figure XXV-2 The picene configuration present in glycyrrhizic acid.
In the NCI study of the third set of experimental cigarettes (1332), the cigarette MSS composition and biological properties (mouse skin-painting studies) of four cigarette samples were compared. These included three samples to each of which had been added individually a specified amount of glycerol (Code No. 80), sugar (Code No. 81), and cocoa (Code No. 82).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1139
11/13/08 5:56:43 PM
1140
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-25 NCI Study (Third Set of Experimental Cigarettes): Effect of a Humectant (Glycerol) or Casing Material (Sugar or Cocoa) on Cigarette Smoke Properties (1332, 2683) Relative to CSCa Additive, % Code No. 72 73 74 75
83 80 81 82
Filler
SEB III SEB III SEB III SEB III Avge 72-75 Avge 72-74 SEB III SEB III SEB III SEB III
µg/g
Glyc
Sugar
2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 0 2.95 0 0
5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 5.30 0 0 5.42 0
c
CSC = cigarette smoke condensate TBA = tumor-bearing animals c Glyc = glycerol
µg/g
Cocoa
Acr
Phenol
B[a]A
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00
3.36 3.62 3.30 3.45 3.44 3.44 3.61 3.46 3.54 3.22
3.86 3.70 3.90 3.90 3.84 3.82 4.33 3.82 4.34 4.46
1.43 1.42 1.36 1.44 1.41 1.40 1.21 1.23 1.50 1.40
d
e
% TBAb at Daily Dose of B[a]P
12.5 mg
1.16 0.97 0.95 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.00 1.09 1.08 1.06
28 22 30 11(?) 23 27 22 22 19 28
f
25 mg 50 44 46 44 46 47 31 47 41 49
Acr = acrolein B[a]A = benz[a]anthracene f B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene
a
d
b
e
The fourth sample was a control (Code No. 83) to which none of these casing materials/humectants had been added (1332, 2683). The results are summarized in Table XXV-25 together with data from four Standard Experimental Blend III samples (SEB III, Code Nos. 72–75), the controls for the third set of experimental cigarettes. Variations in the analytical and biological data among these four control samples (Code Nos. 72–75) raised questions about any attempt to compare on a one-to-one basis the data from individual samples, for example, the cocoa-treated sample (Code No. 82) vs. its control (Code No. 83), the sugar-treated sample (Code No. 81) vs. its control (Code No. 83), etc. Additional comments will be made about these data in the following section where humectants are discussed. The phenol data (Code No. 82 vs. Code No. 83) in Table XXV-25 indicate the prediction by Schlotzhauer (3447) appears to be valid: Inclusion of nominal levels of cocoa in the cigarette blend produced little change in the MSS phenol yield. Addition of 1% cocoa (Code No. 82 vs. Code No. 83) increased the phenol yield (mg/g of CSC) by 0.13 mg/g. This is about a 3% increase relative to Cigarette coded No. 83; well within the experimental error of the phenol determination. XXV.D.2.b Humectants (Glycerol, Propylene Glycol) Humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol) are added to the tobacco blend to diminish the rate of post-cigarette-manufacture moisture loss. Cigarettes are usually manufactured with the blend at a 12% moisture content. As the cigarette loses moisture, that is, becomes “dry” during transportation and shelf storage, its yield of smoke components changes adversely, with increased yields not only of particulate-phase entities such “tar” and nicotine but also vapor-phase components such as the aldehydes (acetaldehyde, acrolein) and ketones (acetone, methyl vinyl ketone) [Green et al. (1364)].
These changes usually are perceived by the consumer to be detrimental and unacceptable [Townsend (25A76)]. The pyrolysis of humectants, including glycerol and propylene glycol, was studied in the mid-1960s by Doihara et al. (1023, 1024) and Kröller (2192, 2195, 2196). Kröller examined the pyrolysates from nine humectants (including glycerol and propylene glycol, the most commonly used in the United States) for the yields of B[a]P and other PAHs generated during the pyrolysis. His B[a]P data are summarized in Table XXV-26. In the early studies of methods to control cigarette MSS composition and yield, particularly with regard to PAHs, Bentley and Burgan (286) asserted addition of glycerol at the 3% level to the tobacco blend substantially decreased (by as much as ≈ 60%) the B[a]P yield when the CSCs from glycerol-treated cigarettes vs. untreated tobacco were
Table XXV-26 Benzo[a]pyrene in the Pyrolysates from Various Humectants Used or Proposed for Use in Cigarette Fabrication Humectant Diethylene glycol Triethylene glycol Glycerol 1,2-Propylene glycol 1,3-Propylene glycol Polyethylene glycol 400 Sorbitol Polyethylene glycol 600 Polyethylene glycol 1000 Tobacco, no additives
Benzo[a]pyrene, ng/g Pyrolyzed 15 30 60 60 80 105 130 289 420 20–40
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1140
11/13/08 5:56:44 PM
Pyrolysis
compared. Their finding was challenged by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332). Subsequently, with a reproducible analytical method for B[a]P determination, Scherbak et al. (3440) and de Souza and Scherbak (953) reported that such levels of added glycerol did not have the dramatic effect claimed by Bentley and Burgan on PAHs (or B[a]P) generation during smoking. Scherbak et al. (3440) reported: Addition of glycerol to flue-cured tobacco up to the 6% level does not modify the formation of 3,4-benzpyrene or smoke particulate.
The effect of glycerol added to the cigarette blend on MSS composition and properties was studied by the NCI TWG in the third set of experimental cigarettes (1332, 2683). The results were summarized in Table XXV-26. At the glycerol level (nearly 3%) used in the glycerol-treated sample (Code No. 80), it would be expected that the total particulate matter (TPM) would contain sufficient transferred glycerol to dilute other components by about 10% to 12% [Greene et al. (1382), Laurene et al. (2300), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), Hege (1603)]. This was not observed with B[a]A and B[a]P yields but was with the phenol yield, see the data in Table XXV-26 for sample Code Nos. 80 and 83. The effect of transfer of humectants from the tobacco blend to smoke plus their dilution of the products formed during the cigarette smoking process affects the biological properties (mutagenicity in the Ames bioassay with Salmonella typhimurium) of the MSS particulate matter. In a detailed study of the effect of various casing ingredients (sugars, cocoa, humectants) on smoke chemistry, Baker et al. (174c) determined the yields of various “Hoffmann analytes” when such ingredients were added in various mixtures. They concluded: Many of the casing ingredient mixtures either had no statistically significant effect on the level of analytes investigated in smoke relative to a control cigarette or the produced decreases of up to 44% in some case.
Sugars did increase the yield in MSS of formaldehyde.
XXV.E Cigarette Construction Materials (Paper, Adhesives, etc.) Interest in cigarette MSS components possibly responsible for the epidemiological cigarette smoking-lung cancer association and the biological response observed in mice skin painted with massive CSC doses led to studies of the contribution of cigarette paper to MSS composition, primarily because as a cigarette construction factor, other than the tobacco blend, it contributed substantially (6% to 7%) to the weight of a 1.0-g cigarette. In 1954, Cooper and Lindsey (819), based on fragmentary UV data, reported the presence of several PAHs, including B[a]P, in a “tar” obtained by burning cigarette paper in bulk. Similar findings on PAHs (and B[a]P) in the combustion products of cigarette paper, tobacco, and
1141
cigarettes were reported by Lefemine et al. (2335), Cardon et al (594), and Alvord and Cardon (57). They also proposed an additive (ammonium sulfamate) for paper and/or tobacco to reduce pyrogenesis of PAHs. The ammonium sulfamate efficacy in decreasing B[a]P production in a burning cigarette was discussed by Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 521–523, 528 in (4322)], who noted that the additive gave discordant results in different investigations [no significant B[a]P reduction reported by Bentley and Burgan (286) or Pyriki et al. (3046) vs. substantial B[a]P reduction reported by Alvord and Cardon (57), Lindsey et al. (2370), and Candeli et al. (589]. Whether cigarette paper contributed significantly to the PAHs in cigarette MSS was finally resolved by Wright (4281), who reported that PAHs (and particularly B[a]P) were indeed generated when cigarette paper was burned in bulk or pyrolyzed, but when it was burned in a cylindrical configuration such as that encountered around the cigarette tobacco rod, the yields of PAHs (particularly B[a]P) were insignificant. Between 1963 and 1966, Kröller (2184–2195, 2200, 2203) reported the pyrolysis products from cigarette components permitted in cigarette fabrication in Germany. He estimated the amount of B[a]P generated by pyrolysis of each material at 700°C in air. In addition to tobacco itself (2191), the materials he studied included cellulose, starch, and a number of humectants, adhesives, and dyes consumed during the actual cigarette smoking process. Kröller (2191, 2192) asserted his pyrolysis and the actual cigarette smoking process were qualitatively and quantitatively identical processes. Kröller’s opinion of the equivalence of the fate of a material on pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere vs. its fate in the tobacco rod of a smoked cigarette parallels that of Wynder and Hoffmann (4332). In addition to phenanthrene, 4,5-methylenephenanthrene, and fluoranthene, Kröller reported the identification of four potent PAH mouse-skin tumorigens in his tobacco pyrolysate: DMB[a]A, 3-methylcholanthrene (now known as 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j] aceanthrylene), B[a]P, and DB[a,h]A. Despite their agreement with Kröller (2191, 2192) on the equivalence of the fate of a material in an inert atmosphere pyrolysis and the smoking process, Wynder and Hoffman were critical of several of Kröller’s findings. For example, Wynder and Hoffman (4332) questioned Kröller’s identification of the methyl derivatives (DMB[a]A, 30-methylcholanthrene) in his pyrolysates and smoke samples. However, a methylbenz[a]anthracene had been identified in CSC by Rodgman and Cook (3273) in the late 1950s and numerous methyl- and dimethylbenz[a]anthracenes were subsequently reported in CSC in the late 1970s by Snook et al. (3756, 3757). Table XXV-27, adapted from Kröller (2195), summarizes his data on the amounts of B[a]P generated during the pyrolysis of tobacco and numerous components used in cigarette fabrication. More recently, several studies on the pyrolysis of various adhesives either used or proposed for use as seam pastes in cigarette fabrication were conducted by Best (25A06, 25A07). He reported that, in contrast to a starch pyrolysate, the pyrolysate from polyvinyl acetate showed high levels of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1141
11/13/08 5:56:44 PM
1142
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Certain casing agents, saucing materials, and humectants are widely used in the manufacture of tobacco products. For all we know at this time, it is certainly a possibility that PAH may also be formed from these agents. One should keep in mind, however, that only small amounts of these materials are used for most smoking products.
Table XXV-27 Benzo[a]pyrene in the Pyrolysates from Various Materials Used or Proposed for Use in Cigarette Fabrication (2195) Material
Benzo[a]pyrene, ng/g Pyrolyzed
Their latter statement would also apply to cigarette fabrication materials consumed during the smoking process, such as the adhesives used on the cigarette paper seam, printing inks on the paper, etc. The data from Kröller (2195) on the B[a]P yields generated during cellulose and starch pyrolysis may be compared with those of Gilbert and Lindsey (1289), see Table XXV-28,. This provides an excellent example of the effect of changing pyrolysis conditions (pyrolysis at 650°C in air vs. pyrolysis at 700°C in N2) when two different materials are considered. The different pyrolysis conditions give a ratio of 9.75 (0.78/0.080) for the B[a]P yields from cellulose, but a ratio of 2.43 (0.17/0.070) for the B[a]P yields from starch. Cellulose was included in the Kröller studies because it constitutes the major part of cigarette paper, much of which is consumed during the smoking process. It was not included because cellulose, as wood pulp, is sometimes added by some manufacturers to their reconstituted tobacco sheet (RTS) to improve integrity and reduce fragmentation. The effect of cellulose added to cigarette filler on cigarette MSS composition and properties in a mouse skin-painting bioassay was examined in the mid-1970s in the NCI study of the first set of cigarettes (1329, 2683). The results are poorly defined because the cellulose was added (as wood pulp) at a 7.5% level to fillers made from the Standard Experimental Blend (SEB I) reconstituted into sheet material at three different densities.
Natural Dyes Logwood extract Buckthorn berry extract Madder lake Humic acid, sodium salt
< 10 20 120 270
Humectants Diethylene glycol Triethylene glycol Glycerol 1,2-Propylene glycol 1,3-Propylene glycol Polyethylene glycol 400 Sorbitol Polyethylene glycol 600 Polyethylene glycol 1000
15 30 60 60 80 105 130 289 420
Adhesives and Starches Alginic acid Carob bean flour Starch Cellulose Carboxymethylcellulose, sodium salt Methylcellulose Tragacanth Dialdehyde starch Cellulose monoacetate Carboxymethylstarch Guava gum Gum arabic Hydroxyethylcellulose Agar-agar Tobacco Tobacco (no additives)
30 60 70 80 120 180 230 235 285 300 300 320 340 470
XXV.F Flavoring Ingredients 20–40
acetic acid and B[a]P. Best also examined the pyrolysates from a variety of proposed new cigarette papers (25A04, 25A05, 25A08). In 1967, Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 350–351 in (4332)] noted that pyrolysis data on cigarette components should be considered carefully:
As outlined in Chapter 24 dealing with tobacco and/or smoke components used as flavorful additives, the numerous assertions about the possibly adverse effect of flavorful compounds added to tobacco were never accompanied by any supporting laboratory evidence. None of the information generated over the past decade that the added flavorants had little, if any, adverse effect on the chemical and biological properties of the smoke generated from the treated tobacco has been criticized by any investigator, governmental agency,
Table XXV-28 Pyrolysis of Cellulose and Starch: Comparison of Benzo[a]pyrene Data from Kröller with Those from Gilbert and Lindsey Pyrolysis Conditions Investigator Gilbert and Lindsey (1289) Kröller (2195)
Benzo[a]pyrene, ng/mg of Material Pyrolyzed
Temp., °C
Atmosphere
650 700
N2 air
Cellulose 0.78 0.080
Starch 0.17 0.070
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1142
11/13/08 5:56:45 PM
Pyrolysis
or medical institute or any contradictory data presented. In an exemplary study by Baker and Bishop (172a), 291 flavorful additives were pyrolyzed and, in each case, the yields of the major components of the pyrolysate were determined. As outlined in Chapter 24, many of the compounds used as flavor additives are already components of tobacco and/or its smoke. The behavior of such an additive will not differ from its tobacco inherent counterpart. In addition to the pyrolysis study of Baker and Bishop (172a), there are also many studies in which the effect of added flavorants on the chemical and biological properties of cigarette MSS was determined. Many were summarized in 2004 by Rodgman [see Tables 1 and 7A in (3266)] but since then much additional data have been published. Table XXV-29 lists a variety of references pertinent to the use of tobacco and/or smoke components as additives, their pyrolysis, their effect on smoke composition when added individually to tobacco, and their effect on smoke composition when added as a component of a flavorant formulation. Among the references cited is that of Paschke et al. who, in their report on the effect of ingredients on the chemical and biological properties of MSS, tabulated detailed pyrolysis data on a number of individual tobacco and/or smoke components plus detailed pyrolysis data on a variety of materials studied as tobacco additives [see pp. 226–241, Table 5 in (2896)]. Table XXV-30 lists a variety of references pertinent to compounds used as tobacco additives where the compounds are not known to be present in tobacco or its smoke. Included are references to their pyrolysis plus their effect on smoke composition when added as a component of a flavorant formulation.
1143
Although Table XXV-31 does not involve individual tobacco and/or tobacco smoke compounds, it is included because of the relationship of the entities to tobacco and/or tobacco products. The results of many of the studies cited were published in the early days of the examination of tobacco composition and the attempts to define the precursors in tobacco of various components in MSS. The studies on cocoa and licorice are included because of their level of use in tobacco products. Table XXV-29 deals with individual components that are either tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components, many of which are listed and discussed by Doull et al. (1053), Baker et al. (172a, 174a), Carmines (603), and Rodgman (3266) as additives in tobacco products. Table XXV-30 deals with compounds not identified to date in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke but listed as tobacco product additives. Since our primary concern throughout this project was the discussion of the contribution of individual tobacco components to smoke properties, neither Table XXV-29 nor Table XXV-30 includes the many complex mixtures (oils, extracts, resins, etc.) used as flavorful cigarette tobacco additives that have also been studied in detail with regard to their pyrolysates (172a, 172b) and their effect as tobacco additives on the chemical (174a, 174b, 630, 3370) and biological properties (174a, 25A24, 25A25, 25A27, 25A43, 25A49, 25A79) of cigarette smoke. Table XXV-32 [updated from Table 6 in (3266)] summarizes the specific conclusions from many of such studies conducted between 1994 and 2005. A more detailed summary of the chemical and biological studies through mid-2004 of the complex mixture additives was presented by Rodgman [see Tables 2 and 7B in (3266)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1143
11/13/08 5:56:46 PM
1144
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1144
11/13/08 5:56:47 PM
Pyrolysis
1145
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1145
11/13/08 5:56:48 PM
1146
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1146
11/13/08 5:56:58 PM
Pyrolysis
1147
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1147
11/13/08 5:57:00 PM
1148
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1148
11/13/08 5:57:01 PM
Pyrolysis
1149
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1149
11/13/08 5:57:04 PM
1150
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1150
11/13/08 5:57:07 PM
Pyrolysis
1151
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1151
11/13/08 5:57:09 PM
1152
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1152
11/13/08 5:57:12 PM
Pyrolysis
1153
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1153
11/13/08 5:57:22 PM
1154
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1154
11/13/08 5:57:37 PM
Pyrolysis
1155
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1155
11/13/08 5:57:38 PM
1156
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1156
11/13/08 5:57:41 PM
Pyrolysis
1157
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1157
11/13/08 5:57:43 PM
1158
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1158
11/13/08 5:57:52 PM
Pyrolysis
1159
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1159
11/13/08 5:57:54 PM
1160
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1160
11/13/08 5:57:56 PM
Pyrolysis
1161
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1161
11/13/08 5:57:59 PM
1162
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1162
11/13/08 5:58:01 PM
Pyrolysis
1163
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1163
11/13/08 5:58:04 PM
1164
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1164
11/13/08 5:58:06 PM
Pyrolysis
1165
Table XXV-29 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1165
11/13/08 5:58:09 PM
1166
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-30 Pyrolysis of Non-Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Smoke Components and/or Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco References to
CAS No. 105-87-3 150-84-5 151-05-3 3681-71-8 140-39-6 143-13-5 2442-10-6 24851-98-7 103-54-8 76-49-3 141-97-9 53956-04-0 1336-21-6 10031-82-0 1319-88-6 698-27-1 151-10-0 1076-56-8
Name (per CA Collective Index)
104-87-0 122-43-0 102-22-7 5421-17-0 101-94-0 102-13-6 105-13-5 122-91-8 102-17-0 7549-33-9 93-92-5 104-53-0 13341-72-5 134-20-3 87-19-4 118-58-1] 120-47-8 94-13-3 121-98-2 94-46-2 126-64-7 532-32-1 125-12-2 87-69-4
Acetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester {geranyl acetate} Acetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenyl ester {citronellyl acetate} Acetic acid, 1,1-dimethyl-2-phenylethyl ester {α,α-dimethylphenethyl acetate} Acetic acid, 3-hexen-1-yl ester, (Z)- {cis-3-hexen-1-yl acetate} Acetic acid, 4-methylphenyl ester {p-tolyl acetate} Acetic acid, nonyl ester {nonyl acetate} Acetic acid, 1-octen-3-yl ester {1-octen-3-yl acetate} Acetic acid, 2-pentyl-3-oxo-1-cyclopentyl-, methyl ester {methyl dihydrojasmonate} Acetic acid, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester {cinnamyl acetate} Acetic acid, endo-1,7,7-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl ester {bornyl acetate} Acetoacetic acid, ethyl ester {ethyl acetoacetate} Ammonium glycyrrhizinate a Ammonium hydroxide Benzaldehyde, 4-ethoxy-{p-ethoxybenzaldehyde} Benzaldehyde glyceryl acetal Benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-{2-hydroxy-4-methylbenzaldehyde} Benzene, 1,3-dimethoxy-{m-dimethoxybenzene} Benzene, 3-methoxy-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- {4-isopropyl-3-methoxy-1methylbenzene} Benzeneacetaldehyde, 4-methyl- {p-tolylacetaldehyde} Benzeneacetic acid, butyl ester {butyl phenylacetate} Benzeneacetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadieny-1-yl ester {geranyl phenylacetate} Benzeneacetic acid, hexyl ester {hexyl phenylacetate} Benzeneacetic acid, 4-methylphenyl ester {p-tolyl phenylacetate} Benzeneacetic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester {isobutyl phenylacetate} Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-{anisyl alcohol} Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, formate {anisyl formate} Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, phenylacetate {anisyl phenylacetate} Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, propanoate {anisyl propionate} Benzenemethanol, α-methyl-, acetate {α-methylbenzyl acetate} Benzenepropanal {3-phenylpropionaldehyde} Benzofuranone, dimethyltetrahydro- {dimethyltetrahydrobenzofuranone-} Benzoic acid, 2-amino-, methyl ester {methyl anthranilate} Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 2-methylpropyl ester {isobutyl salicylate} Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl salicylate} Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-, ethyl ester {ethyl p-hydroxybenzoate} Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-, propyl ester {propyl p-hydroxybenzoate} Benzoic acid, 4-methoxy-, methyl ester {methyl anisate} Benzoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl benzoate} Benzoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-yl ester {linalyl benzoate} Benzoic acid, sodium salt {sodium benzoate} Bicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-ol, 1,7,7,-trimethyl-, acetate {isobornyl acetate} Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy- {l-tartaric acid}
7492-70-8 109-21-7 106-29-6 10094-34-5 539-90-2 540-18-1 106-27-4 10032-15-2 109-19-3 55066-56-3 16409-46-4
Butanoic acid, 2-butoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl ester {butyl butyryl lactate} Butanoic acid, butyl ester {butyl butyrate} Butanoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester {geranyl butyrate} Butanoic acid, 1,1-dimethyl-2-phenylethyl ester {α,α-dimethylphenethyl butyrate} Butanoic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester {isobutyl butyrate} Butanoic acid, pentyl ester {amyl butyrate} Butanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl butyrate} Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, hexyl ester {hexyl 2-methylbutyrate} Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, butyl ester {butyl isovalerate} Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 4-methylphenyl ester {p-tolyl 3-methylbutyrate} Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)- cyclohexyl ester {menthyl isovalerate}
Pyrolysis of Individual Component
Effect on Mainstream Smoke Composition, When Component Added in a Mixture
172a 172a
174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174b 174b, 603, 3370 603, 3370 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b
172a 172a
172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a
172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a
174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174b 603, 3370 603, 3370 603, 3370 603, 3370 174a, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 603, 3370 603, 3370 603, 3370
2208, 2896 172a 172a 2208, 2896 172a 172a, 2201, 2896,
603, 3370 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174c
172a
603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370
172a
174b
172a 172a 172a 172a 172a
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1166
11/13/08 5:58:10 PM
1167
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-30 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Non-Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Smoke Components and/or Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco References to Pyrolysis of Individual Component
Effect on Mainstream Smoke Composition, When Component Added in a Mixture
Butanoic acid, phenylethyl ester {phenethyl butyrate} 2-Butanone, 4-(4-methyoxyphenyl)- {4-(p-methoxyphenyl)-2-butanone} 2-Butenoic acid, ethyl ester; (E)- {ethyl trans-2-butenoate} 3-Buten-2-ol, 4-phenyl- {4-phenyl-3-buten-2-ol} 3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,5,6,6-tetramethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)- {α-irone} 2,3-Cyclohexanedione, 1-methyl- {1-methyl-2,3-cyclohexadione} Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-, acetate {menthyl acetate}
172a 172a 172a
174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b ????? 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b
Cyclohexanone, 2-(1-mercapto-1-methylethyl)-5-methyl- {p-Mentha-8-thiol-3-one} Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)- {dl-isomenthone} Cyclohexene, 4-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenylidene)-1-methyl- {bisabolene} Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(methylethylidene)- {terpinolene} 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)- {d-carvone} 5H-Cyclopenta[b]pyrazine, 6,7-dihydro-5-methyl- {5H-5-methyl-6,7dihydrocyclopenta[b]pyrazine} 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy- {3-ethyl-2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one} Decanedioic acid, diethyl ester {diethyl sebacate} Ethanol, 2,2’-oxybis- {diethylene glycol} Ethanone, 1-(2,4-dimethylphenyl)- {2,4-dimethylacetophenone} Ethanone, 1-(2-thiazolyl)-(2-acetylthiazole} Formic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester {geranyl formate} Formic acid, 3-hexenyl ester, (E)- {3-hexenyl formate, (E)-} Formic acid, pentyl ester {amyl formate} 2(3H)-Furanone, 2,5-dihydro-4,5-dimethyl-3-hydroxy- {4,5-dimethyl-3-hydroxy-2,5dihydrofuran-2-one} 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-heptyl- {γ-undecalactone} 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-octyl- {γ-dodecalactone} 3(2H)-Furanone, 2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy- {2,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-3(2H)-furanone} 3(2H)-Furanone, 3-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl- {3-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3(2H)furanone} 2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl- {5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-2(5H)furanone} 2-O-β-D-Glucopyranuronysyl-α-D-glucopyranosiduronic acid (3β,20β)-20-carboxy11-oxo-30-norolean-12-en-3-yl- {glycyrrhizic acid; glycyrrhizin} Heptanoic acid, ethyl ester {ethyl heptanoate} 4-Heptenal {4-heptenal} 3-Hepten-2-one {3-hepten-2-one} ω-6-Hexadecenlactone {ω-6-Hexadecenlactone} 2,4-Hexadienoic acid, potassium salt {potassium sorbate}
172a 172a
CAS No. 103-52-6 104-20-1 10544-63-5 76-69-6 3008-43-3 16409-45-3 89-48-5 38462-22-5 491-07-6 495-62-5 586-62-9 2244-16-8 23747-48-0 21835-01-8 110-40-7 111-46-6 89-74-7 24295-03-2 105-86-2 33467-73-1 638-49-3 28664-35-9 104-67-6 2305-05-7 3658-77-3 27538-09-6 698-10-2 1405-86-3 106-30-9 6728-31-0 1119-44-4 7779-50-2 590-00-1 24634-61-5 2198-61-0 540-07-8 3452-97-9 21834-92-4 13419-69-7 551-08-6 17369-59-4 3738-00-9 7786-44-9 31502-14-4 141-12-8 107-75-5
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Hexanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl hexanoate} Hexanoic acid, pentyl ester {amyl hexanoate} 1-Hexanol, 3,5,5-trimethyl- {3,5,5-trimethyl-1-hexanol} 2-Hexenal, 5-methyl-2-phenyl- {5-methyl-2-phenyl-2-hexenal} 2-Hexenoic acid, (E)- {2-hexenoic acid, (E)-} 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3-butylidene {3-butylidenephthalide} 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3-propylidene {3-propylidenephthalide} Naphtho[2,1-b]furan, dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl- {ambroxide} 2,6-Nonadien-1-ol {2,6-nonadien-1-ol} 2-Nonen-1-ol {2-nonen-1-ol} 2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimetyyl-, acetate, (Z)- {neryl acetate} Octanal, 3,7-dimethyl-7-hydroxy- {hydroxycitronellal}
172a 172a 172a
172a 172a 172a 172a
174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370
2192, 2896
172a
603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b
172a 172a 172a 172a
174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 1974b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b
172a
174a, 174b, 603, 3370
172a 172a 172a
2896, 25A87 172a 172a 172a 2208, 2896 172a 172a 172a 3 172a 172a 172a 172a 120 172a 172a
174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174b, 603, 3370 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1167
11/13/08 5:58:11 PM
1168
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-30 (Continued) Pyrolysis of Non-Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Smoke Components and/or Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco References to Pyrolysis of Individual Component
Effect on Mainstream Smoke Composition, When Component Added in a Mixture
Octanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl octanoate} 6-Octenoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl- {3,7-dimethyl-6-octenoic acid}
172a 172a
174a, 174b 174a, 174b, 603, 3370
7-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl- {rhodinol} 2-Octynoic acid, methyl ester {methyl 2-octynoate} Pentanoic acid, butyl ester {butyl valerate} 4-Penten-3-one, 5-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)- {methyl-α-ionone} Phenol, 2-ethoxy-5-(1-propenyl)- {5-propenylguaethol} Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy- {4-ethylguaiacol} Propanal, 2-methyl-3-[4-(1-methylethyl)]phenyl-{2-methyl-(p-isopropylphenyl)propionaldehyde; cyclamen aldehyde} Propanedioc acid, diethyl ester {diethyl malonate} 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, potassium salt {potassium citrate} 1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, sodium salt {sodium citrate} 1,2,3-Propanetriol, monoacetate {monoacetin} 1,2,3-Propanetriol, triacetate {triacetin} Propanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl propionate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenyl ester {citronellyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester {ethyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-methyl-4-oxo-4H-pyran-3-yl ester {maltyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 4-methylphenyl ester {p-tolyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-3-yl ester {linalyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, octyl ester {octlyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylethyl ester {phenethyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester {cinnamyl isobutyrate} Propanoic acid, 3-(methylthio)-, methyl ester {methyl 3-methylthiopropionate} Propanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl propionate} 2-Propanone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)- {1-(p-methoxyphenyl)-2-propanone} 2-Propenal, 3-phenyl-, α-pentyl- {α-amylcinnamaldehyde} 1-Propene, 1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid {aconitic acid} 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 2-methylpropyl ester {isobutyl cinnamate} 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, phenylethyl ester {phenethyl cinnamate} Pyran, 4-methyl-2-(2-methylpropen-1-yl)-tetrahydro- {rose oxide} 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-butyltetrahydro- {δ-nonalactone} 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-heptyltetrahydro- {δ-dodecalactone} 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-hexyltetrahydro- {δ-undecalactone} 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-methyltetrahydro- {δ-hexalactone} 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-nonyltetrahydro- {tetradecalactone} 2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-pentyltetrahydro- {δ-decalactone} Pyrazine, 2-methoxy-3-methyl- {2-methyl-3-methoxypyrazine} Pyrazine, 2-methoxy-5-methyl- {2-methyl-5-methoxypyrazine} Pyrazine, 2-methoxy-6-methyl- {2-methyl-6-methoxypyrazine} Quinoxaline, 5-methyl- {5-methylquinoxaline} Quinoxaline, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro- {5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoxaline} Tetradecanoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester {isopropyl myristate} 5-Thiazoleethanol, 4-methyl- {4-methyl-5-thiazole ethanol}
172a 172a 172a 172a 172a
174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b
CAS No. 2035-99-6 502-47-6 6812-78-8 141-25-3 111-12-6 591-68-4 127-42-4 94-86-0 2785-89-9 103-95-7 105-53-3 866-84-2 68-04-2 26446-35-5 102-76-1 105-68-0 97-89-2 97-62-1 65416-14-0 103-93-5] 78-35-3 109-15-9 103-48-0 103-28-6 103-59-3 13532-18-8 122-63-4 122-84-9 122-40-7 499-12-7 122-67-8 103-53-7 16409-43-1 3301-94-8 713-95-1 710-04-3 823-22-3 2721-22-4 705-86-2 2847-30-5 2882-22-6 2882-21-5 13708-12-8 34413-35-9 110-27-0 137-00-8
Name (per CA Collective Index)
172a 172a
2206, 2896 172a, 2896 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 3486 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a 172a
174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 603, 3370 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b, 603, 3370 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174b, 603, 3370 174b, 603, 3370 174b 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b 174a, 174b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1168
11/13/08 5:58:12 PM
1169
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-31 Pyrolysis of Miscellaneous Tobacco Product Components Plus Their Effect on Smoke Composition When Added to Tobacco References to Effect on Mainstream Smoke Composition, When Component Added CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Pyrolysis of Individual Component
Cocoa
172b, 2896, 3447
Hydrocarbons, aliphatic, tobacco-derived
2257, 3616
Individually
In a Mixture
174a, 174c, 603, 3370 3269, 3291
Licorice
172b, 743, 1356, 2204, 2896
Phytosterols, tobacco derived
4346
Polyphenol pigment, tobacco-derived
725a, 726
Tobacco
162, 163, 170, 171a, 172c, 276, 277, 369, 521, 522, 532, 536, 1357, 1651, 2071, 2072, 2196, 3190, 3468, 3616, 4150-4153, 4279, 4319, 4332, 25A35, 25A63
Tobacco extract
722, 3456, 3458, 3465-3467, 3470, 3472, 3616, 3877, 4355, 25A35
174a, 174c
Table XXV-32 Summary of Tobacco Ingredient Studies from 1994–2005
Analysis
Detailed literature survey of ingredients added to U.S. tobacco products
Date
Number of Ingredients Studied
Reported Findings/Conclusions
Reference
1994
599
“…it was concluded that there was no evidence that any ingredient added to cigarette tobacco produces harmful effects under the conditions of use in cigarettes.”
Doull et al. (1053)
Effect of added tobacco 2002 ingredients on cigarette MSS chemistry
333
“The smoke chemistry data revealed changes towards both higher Carmines (603); and lower amounts of various smoke constituents…This suggests Rustemeier et al. (3370) that the addition of 333 commonly used ingredients to cigarettes in three groups did not add to the toxicity of the smoke, even at the exaggerated levels tested… “An overall assessment of our data suggests that these ingredients, when added to the tobacco, do not add to the toxicity of smoke, even at the elevated levels used in this series of studies.”
2002
482
“In most cases, the flavour mixtures had no statistically significant effect on the smoke yields relative to the control cigarette. In a few cases, the small increases or decreases were observed for some analytes relative to the control cigarette. The smoke yields of the experimental cigarettes were well within the ranges observed in the three reference cigarettes.”
Baker and Smith (25A03)
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1169
11/13/08 5:58:12 PM
1170
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXV-32 (Continued) Summary of Tobacco Ingredient Studies from 1994–2005
Analysis
Date
2004
Number of Ingredients Studied
482
Reported Findings/Conclusions
“The significances of differences between the test and control cigarettes were determined using both the variability of the data on the specific occasion of the measurement, and also taking into account the long-term variability of the analytical measurements over the one-year period in which analyses were determined in the present study. This long-term variability was determined by measuring the levels of the 44 “Hoffmann analytes” in a reference cigarette on many occasions over the one-year period of this study.
Reference
Baker et al. (174b)
“…It was found that, in most cases, the mixtures of flavouring ingredients (generally added in parts per million levels) had no statistically significant effect on the analyte smoke yields relative to the control cigarette.” Effect of added tobacco 1997, ingredients on cigarette 2002 MSS biology:
≈152
a) in vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity
b) MSS inhalation
“Although the mutagenic activities appeared to be similar, there were statistically significant differences in mutagenic activities among the sample.”
Bioresearch [for RJRT] (25A09); Rodgman (3263, 3264)
[Note: The differences were primarily due to the increase in mutagenicity of the CSC when the humectants (glycerol, propylene glycol) were not added to the cigarette tobacco and thus were not present as diluents in the CSC]. 2002
333
“Within the sensitivity and specificity of the test systems, the in vitro mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of the cigarette smoke were not increased by the addition of the ingredients.”
Carmines (603); Roemer et al. (25A49)
2002
482
“The data has been analyzed and demonstrates no additional activity from the flavoured cigarettes above that of the control products.”
Massey et al. (25A43)
1997, 2002
“It was concluded that addition of the tested humectants singly or 2 (glycerol, in combination had no meaningful effect on the site, extent or propylene frequency of respiratory tract changes associated with smoke exposure in rats.” glycol)
Gaworski et al. (25A27)
1997
1 “The results of this 13-week inhalation study indicated that the (menthol) addition of 5000 ppm menthol to tobacco had no substantial effect on the character or extent of the biological responses normally associated with inhalation of mainstream cigarette smoke in rats.”
Gaworski et al. (25A24)
1998
170
“The results indicate that the addition of flavoring ingredients to cigarette tobacco had no discernible effect on the character or extent of the biologic responses normally associated with inhalation of mainstream cigarette smoke in rats.”
Gaworski et al. (25A25)
2002
333
Carmines (603); “The data indicate that the addition of these 333 commonly used Vanscheeuwijck et ingredients, added to cigarette in three groups, did not increase the inhalation toxicity of the smoke, even at the exaggerate levels al. (25A79) used.”
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1170
11/13/08 5:58:13 PM
1171
Pyrolysis
Table XXV-32 (Continued) Summary of Tobacco Ingredient Studies from 1994–2005
Analysis
Date
Number of Ingredients Studied
Reported Findings/Conclusions
Reference
c) Mainstream CSC and skin painting
1999
150
“While tumor incidence, latency and multiplicity data occasionally differed between test and comparative reference CSC groups, all effects appeared to be within normal variation for the model system. Furthermore, none of the changes appeared to be substantial enough to conclude that the tumor promotion capacity of CSC obtained from cigarettes containing cigarettes with ingredients was discernibly different from the CSC obtained from reference cigarettes containing tobacco processed without ingredients.”
Gaworski et al. (25A26)
Pyrolysis of tobacco ingredients under conditions simulating those in the cigarette burning zone
2004
291
“The results are compatible with parallel studies in which the ingredients are added to tobacco and the effect on cigarette smoke constituents are measured. In general, the number of “Hoffmann analytes” detected among the pyrolysis products of the ingredients, and their levels, are low…Of the 291 tobacco ingredients pyrolysed, almost a third transfer out of the pyrolysis zone intact, and almost two thirds transfer at least 95% intact.”
Baker and Bishop [see pp. 245-246 in (172a)]
2005
159
“…a further 159 non-volatile and complex ingredients, as well as ingredient mixtures have been pyrolyzed…For the pyrolysis of many of the non-volatile ingredients, no “Hoffmann analytes” were detected among the products.
Baker and Bishop (172b)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C025.indd 1171
11/13/08 5:58:13 PM
26
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Because of the diverse nature of this chapter, the following listing of its contents is provided: Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens: The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Other classes of carcinogens, tumorigens, and mutagens: Aza-arenes N-Nitrosamines N-Heterocyclic amines Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens: Alternate exposure to carcinogens: Alternate exposures to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Alternate exposures to aza-arenes Alternate exposures to N-nitrosamines Alternate exposures to N-heterocyclic amines Summary:
XXVI.A Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued several draft documents in which it defined environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) as a carcinogen and designated it as a “Group A Carcinogen” (1148, 1148a). Subsequently, EPA issued a final report on this topic (1148b). Data from various epidemiological studies on the incidence of lung cancer in nonsmokers exposed to ETS were interpreted by the EPA as indicating that ETS was causally related to lung cancer in the ETS-exposed nonsmokers. In addition to these epidemiological data, EPA relied on data from studies on tobacco smoke composition, particularly the many studies dealing with the composition of mainstream smoke (MSS) as well as the smaller number of studies dealing with sidestream smoke (SSS) composition. Of the limited number of SSS components for which quantitative data have been obtained on per cigarette yields, many are delivered at higher per cigarette levels in SSS than in MSS. Many of the SSS components quantified are those that have been considered as contributors to respiratory tract or other disease problems, based on results reported from laboratory animal experiments with individual compounds. EPA extrapolated these SSS (and MSS) qualitative and quantitative composition data directly to ETS with little regard for the profound quantitative differences between MSS and SSS composition and the highly diluted ETS system
and the biological implications of these differences (3255, 3255a, 3257). Of prime concern to EPA were those mss and sss components that, in one biological system or another, had been described as tumorigenic at doses far in excess of those encountered in mss and sss (1148). The cigarette MSS components of greatest concern to EPA were thirty-five MSS components listed by Hoffmann and Wynder (1808) in 1986, a list derived from the 1986 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monographs on tobacco smoking (1869, 1870) and expanded in 1990 to forty-three MSS (and tobacco) components by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727). The Hoffmann and Hecht list was the first of many lists issued from 1990 through 2001 by Hoffmann and his colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773), by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1994 (2825), and by Fowles and Bates in 2001 (1217). These listings involved tobacco and tobacco smoke components previously reported to be tumorigenic, carcinogenic, or biologically active in various bioassays with individual components. The components of tobacco smoke were particularly emphasized (3265). Eventually, many of the listed MSS components, because of their multiple listings by Hoffmann and his colleagues, became defined as “Hoffmann analytes.” Table XXVI-1 is a tabulation of toxicants in tobacco and tobacco smoke from the IARC 1986 publication (1870) plus the seven lengthy publications co-authored from 1986 through 2001 by Hoffmann and his colleagues at the American Health Foundation (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808). In their 1990 list, Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) classified forty-three tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components as “tumorigenic agents in tobacco smoke.” It is interesting to note that they used the term “tumorigenic” rather than “carcinogenic” to define the components. A similar list was issued by Hoffmann et al. (1773) in 1993. In 1994, OSHA (2825)* tabulated forty-three tobacco smoke components for which it claimed there was “sufficient evidence” of carcinogenicity in humans or animals. For some unknown reason, the OSHA list included only forty-two items. Obviously, polonium-210 was inadvertently omitted. OSHA listed many of the same components as Hoffmann and Hecht but included several components not listed by them (1727) and vice versa. *
OSHA [see pp 15979–15980 in (2825)] presented a table entitled Table II-2. 43 chemical compounds identified in tobacco smoke for which there is “Sufficient Evidence” of carcinogenicity in humans or animals. However, Table II-2 lists only 42 items because 210Po, listed by many investigators as a hazard, was inadvertently omitted by OSHA.
1173
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1173
11/24/08 12:38:55 PM
1174
78836_C026.indd 1174
Table XXVI-1 Tumorigens, Carcinogens, and Toxicants Listed by Hoffmann and Colleagues 1986 Component Number of tumorigens and/or toxicants
IARC (1870)a
1986 Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)
1990 Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
1993 Hoffmann et al. (1773)
1997 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740)
1998 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741)
2001 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743)
2001 Hoffmann et al. (1744)
35
43
43
60
70
68
69
40–70 ngg 40–60 ngj
20–70 ng
20–70 ng
20–70 ng
20–70 ng
20–70 ng
20–70 ng
30 ngg
4–22 ng
4–22 ng
4–22 ng
4–22 ng
4–22 ng
4–22 ng
60 ngg
6–21 ng
6–21 ng
6–21 ng
6–21 ng
6–21 ng
6–21 ng
NLe 10–50 ng g 10–40 ngi
6–12 ng 20–40 ng
6–12 ng 20–40 ng
6–12 ng 20–40 ng
6–12 ng 20–40 ng
6–12 ng 20–40 ng
6–12 ng 20–40 ng
40–60 ng g 0.6 ng 40 ng NLe NLe NL
40–60 ng 0.6 ng 4 ng NL NL 1.7–3.2 ng
40–60 ng 0.6 ng 4 ng NL NL 1.7–3.2 ng
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng NL NL 1.7–3.2 ng
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng P, NYLf NL NLf
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng P, NYLf NL NLf
NL 0.6 ng 4 ng P, NYLf NL NL f
Dibenzo[a,l]pyreneg Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
20–70 ng 40–70 ngb 4–76 ngc 4–22 ng 30 ngb 6–21 ng 60 ngb 6–12 ng 20–40 ng 10–50 ngb 5–78 ngc 40–60 ngb 0.6 ng 4 ng P d, NYLe P d, NYLe 1.7–3.2 ng 2–3 ngb 17–32 ngc P, NYL 4–20 ng
P, NYL 4 ng
P, NYL 4–20 ng
P, NYL 4–20 ng
P, NYL 4–20 ng
1.7–3.2 ngf 4–20 ng
1.7–3.2 ngf 4–20 ng
1.7–3.2 ngf 4–20 ng
Aza-arenes Pyridine
16–40 mg
NL
NL
NL
20–200 mgm
10–40 mg
20–200 mgs
NLe 0.1 ng 2.7 ng 3–10 ngb 0.7 ng
NL 0.1 ng g 3–10 ngg
1–2 mg 0.1 ng 3–10 ng
0.2–1.3 mg 0.1 ng 3–10 ng
1–2 mg 0.1 ng 3–10 ng
2–180 ng 0.1 ng 3–10 ng
20–200 mgp 16–40 mgr 1–2 ngx 0.1 ng 3–10 ng
1–2 mg 0.1 ng 3–10 ng
0.7 ng g
0.7 ng
0.7 ng
0.7 ng
0.9 ng
0.7 ng
0.7 ng
2–20 ng 1–200 ngb 0–2.7 ng 0.1–10 ngb
1–180 ngh 2–180 ngj 1–40 ngh 0,1–40 ngj
0.1–180 ng
0.1–180 ng
0.1–180 ng
2–180 ng
2–180 ng
2–1000 ng
3–13 ng
3–13 ng
3–13 ng
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Benz[a]anthracene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene
Chrysene Chrysene, 5-methylDibenz[a,h]anthracene Dibenzo[a,e]pyrene Dibenzo[a,h]pyrene Dibenzo[a,i]pyrene
Quinoline Dibenz[a,h]acridineh Dibenz[a,j]acridine 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole N-Nitrosamines N-Nitrosodimethylamine N-Nitrosoethylmethylamine 11/24/08 12:38:56 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
3–13 ng
3–13 ng
3–13 ng
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
52
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine N-Nitrosopyrrolidine N-Nitrosopiperidine N-Nitrosodiethanolamine N-Nitrososarcosine N’-Nitrosonornicotine 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone N’-Nitrosoanabasine N’-Nitrosoanatabine N-Nitrosomorpholine Aromatic Amines Aniline 2-Toluidine Aniline, 2,6-dimethyl1-Naphthylamine 2-Naphthylamine Biphenyl, 3-amino Biphenyl, 4-aminoN-Heterocyclic amines k AaC MeAaC Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 PhIP IQ MeIQ Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2
0–2.8 ng 0–10 ngb 0–1 ng 0–3 ng 0–110 ng 2–42 ngb 0–9 ng 0–36 ng 0–90 ngb NL 0.2–3.0 mg 0.13–0.25 mgb 0.08–0.77 mg 0.08–0.7 mgb 0–150 ng 0–200 ngb NL 0–3.7 mgb NL NL 32–160 ng 30–200 ngb NL NL 3–4 ngb 1.7–22 ng 1–22 ngb NL 2.4–4.6 ng 2–5 ngb NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL
0.1–28 ng
0–25 ng
0–25 ng
0–2.8 ng
0–2.8 ng
0–2.8 ng
0–2.8 ng
0–1 ng 0–3 ng 2–110 ngh 2–42 ngj 0–9 ng 0–40 ng
NL NL 1.5–110 ng
NL NL NL
NL NL 3–60 ng
0–1.0 ng 0–30 ng 3–110 ng
0–1.0 ng 0–30 ng 3–110 ng
0–1.0 ng 0–30 ng 3–110 ng
NL 0–36 ng
NL NL
NL 0–68 ng
0–9 ng 0–68 ng
0–9 ng 0–68 ng
0–9 ng 0–68 ng
NL 0.12–3.7 mg
NL 0.12–3.7 mg
NL 0.12–3.7 mg
NYL 0.12–3.7 mg
ND e 120–3.700 ngv
NL 0.12–3.7 mgv
NL 0.12–3.7 mgv
0.12–0.95 mg
0.08–0.77 mg
0.08–0.77 mg
0.08–0.77 mg
0.08–0.77 mg
0.08–0.77 mg
0.08–0.77 mg
40–400 ngh 120 ngj NL
0.14–4.6 mg
0.14–4.6 mg
0.14–4.6 mg
0–150 ng
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NDk in MSS
ND in MSS
ND in MSS
ND in MSS
NL
NL
360 ng 30–160 ng
360 ng 30–200 ng
NL 30–200 ng
NL 30–200 ng
360–655 ng 30–337 ng
360–655 ngr 30–337 ng
NL 30–337 ng
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
4–50 mgx NL
4–50 ngx NL
4.3–27 ng
1–22 ng
1–22 ng
1–22 ng
1–334 ng
1–334 ng
1–334 ng
NL 2.4–4.6 ng
NL 2–5 ng
NL 2–5 ng
NL 2–5 ng
NL 2–5.6 ng
NL 2–5.6 ng
NL 2–5.6 ng
NL NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL NL
25–260 ng 2–37 ng 0.37–0.89 ng 0.25–0.88 ng 11–23 ng 0.26 ng
25–260 ng 2–37 ng 6.37x–0.89 ng 0.25–0.88 ng 11–23 ng 0.3 ng
25–260 ng NL 0.37–0.89 ng 0.25–0.88 ng 11–23 ng 0.3 ng
25–260 ng 2–37 ng 0.37–0.89 ng 0.25–0.88 ng 11–23 ng 0.3 ng
NL NL NL
NL NL NL
NL 0.3–0.5 ng 0.8–1.1 ng
NL 0.3–0.5 ng 0.8–1.1 ng
NL NL NL
NL 0.29-0.48 ng 0.82–1.1 ng
NL 0.3–0.5 ng 0.8–1.1 ng
1175
11/24/08 12:38:56 PM
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
78836_C026.indd 1175
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
1176
78836_C026.indd 1176
Table XXVI–1 (continued) Tumorigens, Carcinogens, and Toxicants Listed by Hoffmann and Colleagues 1986 Component Aldehydes and Ketones Formaldehyde
IARC (1870)a
1986 Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)
1990 Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
1993 Hoffmann et al. (1773)
1997 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740)
Volatile Hydrocarbons 1,3-Butadiene
NL
NL
NL
NL
Isoprene
NL
NL
NL
NL
Benzene
20-50 mg
20-50 mg
12-48 mg
12-48 mg
Toluene Styrene
NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
20-75 mgl 25-40 mgm 450-1000 mgl 200-400 mgm 12–70 mgl 6-70 mg m 5-90 mg m 10 mg
Acetaldehyde Propionaldehyde Butyraldehyde Crotonaldehyde Acrolein
Miscellaneous Organic Compounds Acetamide Acrylonitrile Acrylamide Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethylMaleic hydrazide Methanol Methyl isocyanate Nitromethane 2–Nitropropane
11/24/08 12:38:56 PM
Nitrobenzene Vinyl chloride
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
10 mg
5–100 mg
70–100 mg
70–100 mg
70–100 mgl 20–100 mgm 18–1400 mgl 400–1400 mgm NL NL NL
500–1200 mg
18–1400 mg
18–1400 mg
NL NL NL 50–100 mg
NL NL 10–20 mg NL
NL NL 10–20 mg NL
60–140 mgm
NL NL 10–20 mg 60–140 mg
100–250 mg NL
NL NL
NL NL
100–650 mgm NL
70–100 mg
2001 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743)
2001 Hoffmann et al. (1744)
70–100 mg 20–100 mgp 500–1400 mgu 400–1400 mgp NL NL NL
70–100 mgl 20–100 mgs 500–1400 mgu 400–1400 mgs NL NL NL
60–140 mgp
60–240 mgs
NL NL
100–650 mgp NL
NL NL
20-75 mg
20-75 mg 25-40 mgp 450-1000 mgu 200-400 mgp 20-70 mg 12-50 mgp 20-60 mg p 10 mg
20-75 mg 25-40 mgs 450-1000 mgu 200-400 mgs 20–70 mg 6-70 mgs 5-90 mg s 10 mg
38–56 mg 3–15 mg P, NYL P, NYL 1.16 mgr 80–180 mgp 100–250 mgr NL
38–56 mg 3–15 mg P, NYL P, NYL
NL
500–1.400 mgu
450-1.00 mgu 20–70 mg NL 10 mg
38-56 mgb 3.2–15 mgb NL P, NYL NL NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
3.2–15 mg NL NL NL NL
3.2–15 mg NL P, NYL NL NL
3.2–15 mg NL P, NYL NL NL
3.2–15 mg P, NYL NYL NL 80–180 mgm
38–56 mg 3–15 mg P, NYL P, NYL 1.16 mg 100–250 mg
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
NL NL
1.5–5 mg NL
0.2–2.2 mg 0.73–1.21 mgb NL 1.3–16 ng 1–16 ngb
0.2–2.2 mg
0.73–1.21 mg
0.73–1.21 mg
0.73–1.21 mg
0.2–2.2 mg
0.3–0.6 mg 0.7–1.2 mg
0.5–0.6 mg 0.7–1.2 mg
NL 1.3–16 ng
NL 1–16 ng
NL 1–16 ng
NL 1–16 ng
25 mg 11–15 ng
25 mg 11–15 ng
25 mg 11–15 ng
80–180 mgs
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Acetone 2-Butanone
70–100 mg 20–88 mgb 500–1200 mg 18–1400 mgb NL NL 10–20 mg 60–100 mg 25–140 mgb 100–250 mg NL
1998 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741)
20–38 ng 7 mg NL 20 mg 18–30 ngu
20–38 mg 7 mg 12–100 ng NL 18–37 ngu
20–38 mg 7 mg 0–100 ng NL
NL
P, NYL
P, NYL
P, NYL
80–60 NL NL NL 200–400 mg
NL NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL NL
80–160 mg NL NL NL 200–400 mg
80–160 mg r NL NL NL 100–360 mg 200–400 mgr
60–180 mg t NL NL NL 90–2000 mg 100–200 mgt
110–300 mg NL NL
NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL
NL NL NL NL
NL NL 20 ng NL
NL NL 20 ng < 3 mg
NL NL 20 ng < 3 mg
NL
NL
NL
800–1200 ng
800–1.200 ngu
800–1200 mg
800–1200 mg
NL NL NL
NL NL NL
NL NL NL
200–370 ng NL NL
200–370 ng NL NL
200–370 mg NL NL
200–370 mg NL NL
24–43 ng NL NL NL NL NL NL 20–3000 ng NL NL 0.03–1.0 pCi NL
24–43 ng NL 40–120 ng NL 41–62 ng 4–70 ng NL 0–600 ng NL 35–85 ng 0.03–1.0 pCi NL
24–43 ng NL 40–120 ng NL 41–62 ng 4–70 ng NL 0–600 ng NL 35–85 ng 0.03–1.0 pCi NL
24–43 ng
24–34 mgx 10–90 mg 40–120 ng
20–38 ng NL NL NL NL
20–38 ng NL NL NL NL
20–38 ng NL NL NL NL
20–38 ng NL NL NL NL
Benzo[b]furan
NL
NL
NL
Phenols Phenol o-Cresol m-Cresol p-Cresol Catechol
60–140 mg 14–30 mg NL NL 40–350 mg
Resorcinol Hydroquinone Methyleugenol Caffeic acid
8–80 mgb 88–155 mgb NL NL
60–140 mg NL NL NL 25–360 mgg 100–350 mgi 140–500 mgj NL
Chloroaromatic Compounds DDT
NL
DDE Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins Polychlorodibenzofurans
0.7–1.2 mg NL NL NL
18–37 mgu
b
Inorganic Components Hydrazine Hydrogen sulfide Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (vi) Cobalt Nickel Mercury Lead Polonium-210 Selenium
24–43 ng NL 1–25 mg NL 9–70 ng 4–70 ng 0.2 ng 0–600 ngb NL Pc 0.03 pCi Pc
20–90 mg 40–120 ng NL 41–62 ng 4–70 ng NL 0–600 ng NL 35–85 ng 0.03–1.0 pCi NL m
0.3 mg NL 4–70 ng 0.13–0.2 ng 0–600 ng 4 ng 34–85 ng 0.03–1.0 pCi NL
24–43 ng
24–43 ng
20–90 mgp 40–120 mg 0.5 ng 7–350 ng 4–70 ng 0.13–0.2 ng 0–600 ng NL 34–85 ng 0.03–1.0 pCi NL
20–90 mgs 40–120 mg 0.5 ng 7–350 ng 4–70 ng 0.13–0.2 ng 0–600 ng
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
78836_C026.indd 1177
20–38 ng 7 mg NL 20 mg 18–30 mgl 20–40 mgm P, NYL
Ethyl carbamate Ethylene oxide Propylene oxide Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Furan
34–85 ng 0.03–1.0 pCi NL (Continued)
1177
11/24/08 12:38:57 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
1178
78836_C026.indd 1178
Table XXVI–1 (continued) Tumorigens, Carcinogens, and Toxicants Listed by Hoffmann and Colleagues 1986 IARC (1870)a
1986 Hoffmann and Wynder (1808)
1990 Hoffmann and Hecht (1727)
Additional Components Nicotine Carbon monoxide Ammonia
1.0–2.3 mg 10–23 mg 50–130 mg
1.0–3.0 mg NL NL
NL NL NL
0.1–3.0 mgn 14–23 mgm 10–130 mgm
1.0–3.0 mg 10–23 mg 10–130 mg
1.0–3.0 mgq 14–23 mgp 10–130 mgp
0.1–3.0 mgt 14–23 mgs 10–130 mgs
Nitrogen oxides Hydrogen cyanide
100–600 mg 400–500 mg
1–2.5 mg 10–23 mg 50–170 mgi 50–130 mgj 50–600 mg 400–500 mg
NL NL
NL NL
100–600 mgm 400–500 mgm
100–600 mg 400–500 mg
100–600 mgp 400–500 mgp
100–600 mgs 400–500 mgs
Component
1993 Hoffmann et al. (1773)
1997 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740)
1998 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1741)
2001 Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1743)
2001 Hoffmann et al. (1744)
See Table 19 in (1870). See Appendix 2 in (1870). c See Table 20 in (1870) d P = present, as listed in Appendix 2 in (1870). e NL= not listed; NYL = no per cigarette MSS yield listed; ND = not detected. f The yield range listed for dibenz[a,l]pyrene is incorrect. It is the range usually listed for dibenzo[a,i]pyrene. The P,NYL designation should also apply to dibenzo[a,l]pyrene. g See Table 5 in (1808). h See Table 6 in (1808). i See Table 11 in (1808). j See Table 13 in (1808). k AaC = 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; MeAaC = 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole; Glu-P-1 = 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole; Glu-P-2 = 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazole; PhIP = 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine; IQ = 2-amino-3-methyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; MeIQ = 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline; Trp-P-1 = 3-amino1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole; Trp-P-2 = 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole l See Table 3 in (1740). m See Table 1 in (1740). n See Table 2 in (1740). p See Table 5-1 in (1743). q See Table 5-2 in (1743). r See Table 5-3 in (1743). sSee Table 2 in (1744). t See Table 3 in (1744). u Compare yield listed in Table 1 in (1741), Table 5-4 in (1743), and Table 4 in (1744). v Compare yield listed in Table 1 in (1741) with those listed in (1727, 1740, 1743, 1744). a
b
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
11/24/08 12:38:57 PM
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
In 1997, Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) classified sixty tobacco and/or tobacco smoke components as “carcinogens in tobacco and cigarette smoke.” Several components listed by Hoffmann and Hecht but omitted by OSHA were also omitted by Hoffmann and Hoffmann. A major addition, accounting for much of the increase from forty-three to sixty was the inclusion of the highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines. EPA (1148) incorrectly assessed the health consequences with regard to lung cancer of the components in the HoffmannHecht list by stating: Of the 99 compounds in tobacco smoke that have been studied in detail, at least 43 are complete carcinogens,* each able on its own to cause the development of cancer in humans or animals.
The EPA erred in its assessment of the forty-three components in the Hoffmann-Hecht list since most have been shown not to be (1) tumorigenic to any human tissue or (2) tumorigenic to lung tissue in laboratory animals. These facts are addressed by comments from Hoffmann and Hecht in the text accompanying their tabulation. In addition, the few compounds that have been reported to produce tumors in laboratory animals have done so at dose levels far in excess of those encountered in MSS, SSS, or ETS. Careful examination of the Hoffmann-Hecht list reveals significant flaws which, if they had been considered at all by the EPA, would have profoundly affected its conclusions concerning ETS. It has been known for over five decades that classifying a substance as “tumorigenic” or “carcinogenic” can be misleading. These terms should not be misinterpreted or over-interpreted. Users of tables with headings “tumorigenic” or “carcinogenic” must be aware of the meaning and limitations of the terms “tumorigenicity” and “carcinogenicity” when applied to specific compounds or elements. The misunderstanding and misinterpretation of these terms are not new. The term “carcinogenesis” and by extension derivative terms were defined precisely as early as 1923 and its original definition is still listed in various medical dictionaries: Carcinogenesis is the process whereby a carcinoma is generated. In the 27th edition (1051c) of Dorland’s Medical Dictionary, this definition of carcinogenesis is the same as that listed in the 13th edition (1051b). Some investigators incorrectly use the term “carcinogenesis” for the production of any tumor type not just a carcinoma. The correct term, if used in this manner, is “tumorigenesis.” The term “carcinogen” is often applied, again often incorrectly, to any factor that induces any type of tumor. Common in the past, but seldom used now, was the term “sarcogenesis” used to describe sarcoma production, the end-point in studies in which a compound injected subcutaneously induced a sarcoma. Within twenty-five years of the first successful experiments to produce tumors in animals by skin painting with solutions of coal tar by Yamagiwa and Ichikawa (4361) and *
OSHA cited the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1989 report (4012) which, in turn, reproduced the table subsequently presented in Hoffmann and Hecht (1727).
1179
within a decade of the first successful skin tumor inductions with pure compounds such as dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) [Kennaway and Hieger (2078)] and benzo[a] pyrene (B[a]P) [Cook et al. (796a, 797), Barry et al. (194)] the misuse and misunderstanding of the term “carcinogenicity” had reached such proportions that Shear, an outstanding and highly regarded U.S. investigator of chemical carcinogenesis, was invited to put the term in perspective. In 1941, Shear and Leiter (3627) published an article in which their admonitions regarding over-interpretation of these terms are as significant today as they were then: The term “carcinogenic potency”… is not to be considered as an invariable property inherent in a compound but is merely a summary of the results of particular experiments and is valid only for animals of the species, strain, sex, age, diet, etc. of the particular animal employed as well as the dose, menstruum, mode and site of application, etc., of the compound in question … Conclusions regarding the potency of any given compounds should therefore be interpreted in the light of the data upon which they are based.
In 1951, Hartwell compiled the second edition (1544) of his survey on compounds tested for carcinogenicity since the demonstrated carcinogenicity of DB[a,h]A and B[a]P in mouse skin-painting experiments. To further the understanding of the terms “carcinogen” and “carcinogenicity” and to minimize their future misuse, Hartwell quoted liberally from the Shear-Leiter publication. He added several important points, one of which was the following: There is a tendency on the part of some to consider carcinogenicity or lack of carcinogenicity as characteristic properties of chemical compounds. In other words, some researchers treat carcinogenicity as a fixed property of a compound. This is not a valid approach to thinking about “carcinogens.” Carcinogenicity is a variable property, depending on a number of factors. It differs from other properties of a compound that are fixed, for example, melting point, boiling point, refractive index, specific gravity, crystalline form. As noted by Shear and Leiter (3627), by Hartwell (1544), and by many others, a substance or factor can show a range from carcinogenicity to noncarcinogenicity to anticarcinogenicity and the response will differ in the laboratory depending on the animal used (species, strain, sex, age), route of administration (inhalation, ingestion, injection [subcutaneous, intravenous, intraperitoneal], skin painting, douching), mode of administration (single vs. multiple doses, neat, in solution, as an aerosol or as a vapor), diet supplied the animals, and cage care. Hartwell also cautioned: Another pitfall is the attempt to carry over, without reservation, to man, conclusions based on animal experiments. We do not know whether man is more or less susceptible than mice to particular carcinogens. Some animal species, such as the rat, rabbit, and dog are much more resistant than is the mouse, and vice versa, while in the monkey none of the powerful carcinogens has been shown to produce tumors.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1179
11/24/08 12:38:57 PM
1180
From an examination of Table XXVI-1, it is obvious that several classes of components account for the greatest number of tumorigens classified as significant in tobacco smoke. Further examination of the number of references cited for each of them in the pertinent chapters of this book indicates the magnitude of the research conducted on each class both within and outside the tobacco industry since the early 1950s. Sequentially, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), azaarenes, N-nitrosamines (NNAs), and N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke have attracted much attention on their identification, quantitation, precursors, and reduction or elimination. Tumorigenic components in these four class account for nearly 60% of the total listed. The following pages contain brief descriptions of the history and chronology of the four classes of tobacco smoke components. The components listed in Table XXVI-1 and by OSHA (2825) and Fowles and Bates (1217) raise numerous questions as to why many of them were included. First, attempts to attribute the “carcinogenicity” of cigarette MSS to a particular component are questionable. Scores of citations over the past five decades have been issued by eminent scientists and health organizations in which it is stated that no single MSS component or class of components acting either individually or in concert can explain observations in human smokers or in laboratory animals treated with heroic doses of MSS. For example, comments on B[a]P in particular or other tumorigenic PAHs in general include those by Cook (793) [see also (796a, 797)], who wrote about B[a]P in cigarette smoke: The tarry condensates of the smoke obtained by smoking cigarettes in machines … have 3,4-benzpyrene, but the amount is exceedingly small and there is considerable doubt about whether the concentration is high enough to produce carcinogenic action.
In 1981, the U.S. Surgeon General [see p. 36 in (4009)] stated: The contribution of BaP or PAH in general to mouse skin carcinogenesis by cigarette smoke condensate cannot be fully measured at this time … In the smoking and health program of the National Cancer Institute … no significant dependence of carcinogenic potency on BaP content was observed.
The American Association for Cancer Research (26A02) in its 1984 position paper on smoking wrote: Studies have presented the profile of the known carcinogens in tobacco. At present, there is no direct method to assign priority to any of these substances as putative causal agents in human lung cancer.
That year, Peto and Doll (26A127) stated: “But 30 years of laboratory research has yet to identify reliably the important carcinogenic factors in cigarette smoke.” The U.S. Surgeon General [see p. 200 in (4010)], on the subject of N-nitrosamines in tobacco smoke, stated: “There is lack of direct evidence that these compounds are also human carcinogens.” This was also the view of Magee, who first demonstrated the tumorigenicity of N-nitrosamines in
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
laboratory animals. In 1983, Magee (26A89) noted, “a role for nitrosamines in the causation of human cancer has not been established.” On the basis of the data available, the aromatic amines, including b-naphthylamine, were discounted in the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1981 and 1982 reports: The presence of b-naphthylamine in cigarette smoke has been demonstrated [Hoffmann et al. (1747)], along with other carcinogenic aromatic amines [Patrianakos et al. (2900)]. The yield was so low that [the researchers] did not believe these agents contributed significantly to the risk of bladder cancer in smokers [see p. 41 in (4009)]. On the basis of quantitative data for aromatic amines in cigarette smoke, an etiological significance of these traces of carcinogenic amines in bladder cancer is questionable, even if one were to consider the total of the aromatic amines and their metabolites [see pp. 207–208 in (4010)].
Similar comments about other components on the various lists have been published: arsenic (4010), nickel (4010), polonium-210 (4009, 4010), and benzene (4005). Many of these MSS and/or tobacco components should be excluded from the lists on the basis of explicit comments in the literature by numerous knowledgeable authorities on their tumorigenicity to laboratory animals at levels determined in MSS, their lack of tumorigenicity in most instances on inhalation, and the equivocal evidence showing their tumorigenicity in humans at levels in MSS. All but four of the forty-three components have never produced respiratory tract tumors in laboratory animals exposed to the component via inhalation. Many have never been tested in an inhalation system, and one component of great interest (B[a]P) has only produced lung carcinoma via inhalation in animals at an extraordinarily massive dose. The following situation should not be overlooked: the MSS yield determined two, three, or four decades ago for a component is not relevant to the MSS yield found by analysis for the component from more recent or current cigarettes. For example, MSS values for dibenz[a,h]acridine and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole were obtained with 1959–1960 cigarettes, MSS values for dibenz[a,j]acridine from 1959–1960 and from 1963 cigarettes, the MSS value for DB[a,h]A is from 1963 cigarettes, the MSS value for 5-methylchrysene is from 1973 cigarettes, and the MSS value for N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) is from commercial cigarettes manufactured in or before 1981. It is well recognized, as indicated in Figure XXVI-1, that the variety of cigarette design technologies (efficient filtration, filter-tip additives, processed tobacco materials [reconstituted tobacco sheet, RTS, expanded tobaccos], air dilution [porous paper, filter-tip perforations], and paper additives) has progressively reduced the sales-weighted average MSS total particulate matter (TPM) by almost 70% from 40 mg/cigarette in the early 1950s to less than 12 mg/cigarette in the late 1980s. These eight cigarette design technologies have been defined, even by various opponents of cigarette smoking, as significant in the design of a “less hazardous” cigarette [Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332), USPHS (4005, 4009), Gori (1333), Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740, 1743, 1744)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1180
11/24/08 12:38:57 PM
1181
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Replacement of all-flue-cured or all-Oriental tobaccos with a blend of flue-cured, burley, and Oriental tobaccos
50.0
3.00 Filter tips Reconstituted tobacco Paper additives
40.0
2.50
Paper porosity
‘TAR,’ mg
Expanded tobacco
2.00
Ventilation
30.0
1.50 20.0
NICOTINE, mg
1913
1.00 10.0
0.0 1954
0.50 ‘TAR’ 1958
NICOTINE 1962
1966
1970 Year
1974
1978
1982
0.00 1986
Figure XXVI-1 “Tar” and nicotine deliveries, sales weighted average basis.
At the same time that the reduction of delivery of MSS TPM was accomplished, the composition of the MSS was altered. For example, for MSS TPM, the B[a]P content— expressed as ng B[a]P/mg TPM—has decreased about 33% (from 1.2 ng/mg TPM to 0.8 ng/mg TPM) during the same time period. The U.S. Surgeon General in his 1979 report (4005) summarized the B[a]P data for a commercial cigarette sold in the United States from 1954 to 1979. As noted by Rodgman and Green (3300), Gold et al., colleagues of Ames, as recently as 1998 questioned the extrapolation of laboratory animal tumorigenesis data generated by the use of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) to a human situation. They stated (1318a):
Formaldehyde N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA) N-Nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR) 2-Toluidine Benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) N’-Nitrosonornicotine (NNN) 4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) N-Nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) Cadmium
probable human carcinogen probable human carcinogen probable human carcinogen probable human carcinogen listed only as an irritant, not as a carcinogen listed only as an animal carcinogen listed only as an animal carcinogen no relevant information available re health effects probable human carcinogen probable human carcinogen
Extrapolation of cancer potency results from MTD studies to real-life exposures is not scientifically supportable.
Despite these and other equivocal statements, OSHA stated with great certainty:
From these considerations and the information presented later, it is obvious that many of the components could and should be removed from the various Hoffmann-co-authored lists that subsequently led to the “Hoffmann analyte” phenomenon. In its 1994 report on indoor air quality, OSHA (2825) dealt at some length with ETS. It presented a list of fortythree tobacco smoke components for which it claimed “there is sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans or animals.” Comparison of the OSHA list with that of Hoffmann and Hecht (Table XXVI-1) reveals numerous similarities plus some differences. OSHA (2825) described ten of its listed tobacco smoke “carcinogens” in the following less-than-positive terms:
The corroborative evidence of the carcinogenic activity of tobacco smoke provided by animal bioassays and in vitro studies and the chemical similarity between mainstream smoke and ETS clearly establish the plausibility that ETS is … a human lung carcinogen.
Of the components in the various lists, the four classes of tobacco smoke components investigated in greatest detail during the past five decades were the PAHs, aza-arenes, NNAs, and the N-heterocyclic amines. Because of the wealth of background information available on PAHs demonstrated to be tumorigenic in laboratory animals, extensive research (isolation, identification, quantitation, precursors, removal, prevention of formation, etc.) was conducted in the 1950s and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1181
11/24/08 12:38:58 PM
1182
1960s on this compound class in tobacco smoke. The reason for selection of this class of compounds was obvious. It has been estimated that more research funds were expended since the 1930s on the study of tumorigenic PAHs in general (and B[a]P in particular) than on any other class of compounds. The results of thousands of investigations on PAHs (their synthesis, biological properties [tumorigenicity, mutagenicity], metabolism, sources [air pollutants, industrial oils and tars, tobacco smoke, foodstuffs, beverages, etc.], isolation, quantitation, reduction, etc.) have been published. Similar studies, but to a much lesser degree, have been conducted on the aza-arenes. Since the early 1950s, over 500 PAHs and slightly fewer than 300 aza-arenes have been reported as tobacco smoke components. The per cigarette yields of most of the PAHs and aza-arenes are in the subnanogram range. In the early 1950s, the discovery of the tumorigenicity by Barnes and Magee (192) of an NNA in laboratory animals initiated a flurry of research on the NNAs, initially in foodstuffs and subsequently (mid-1960s) in tobacco smoke. In contrast to the great number of PAHs and aza-arenes identified in tobacco smoke, fewer than sixty NNAs have been identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke to date. In the mid-1970s, Japanese investigators in their investigations of various cooked foodstuffs reported the isolation and identification of several N-heterocyclic amines derived pyrogenetically from amino acids and proteins [Sugimura et al. (3829, 3829a), Sugimura (3828b, 3828c)]. Subsequently, several of the N-heterocyclic amines were reported to possess inordinately high mutagenicities in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium, be tumorigenic in the mouse skin-painting bioassay, and to be present in cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) at low nanogram or subnanogram levels [Sato et al. (3415a), Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368)]. Fewer than a dozen of the highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines have been reported as CSC components.
XXVI.A.1 The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons In the case of the PAHs in general and the thirteen specific PAHs listed in Table XXVI-1, many of the assertions about them in tobacco smoke since the early 1950s have either been shown to be incorrect or, in several instances, highly equivocal. Several sources of PAHs in cigarette MSS, originally considered to be the major sources of the PAHs, were shown to be either incorrect (effluents from lighting source, such as matches and butane- or hexane-fueled lighters) or insignificant (PAH-containing air pollutants deposited on the surface of the tobacco leaf during growing, harvesting, and curing) or primarily derived from cigarette paper combustion. Long-chained saturated hydrocarbons were originally defined as the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in tobacco smoke. Subsequently, it was shown that the contributions of tobacco terpenes and phytosterols to the levels of MSS or SSS PAHs exceeded those of the saturated hydrocarbons. In the mid- to late 1950s, it was proposed (3241, 3242) that the per cigarette yields of MSS PAHs would be diminished by removal of saturated hydrocarbons, phytosterols, and terpenes
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
from the tobacco by extraction with nonpolar solvents such as hexane, a process dubbed the “dry cleaning” of tobacco.* It was proposed that the reduced MSS PAH level in the CSC from cigarettes fabricated with extracted tobacco would be accompanied by reduced tumorigenicity to mouse skin of the extracted tobacco CSC [Wynder and Wright (4354)]. In 1982, Brunnemann and Hoffmann, members of a research group that formerly proposed removal of wax-like compounds considered to be the precursors of the PAHs in smoke, advocated addition of such compounds to tobacco (480). Also in the late 1950s, it was proposed to use high-nitrate tobacco in the tobacco blend or add nitrate to the blend to modify the combustion process during smoking to decrease the MSS PAH yields [Hoffmann and Wynder (1797, 1798)]. In direct contrast was a 1982 proposal: Because of the involvement of nitrate and nitrogen oxides generated from it in the pyrogenesis of NNAs, use low-nitrate tobaccos in the blend or remove the nitrate from tobacco as a means to control NNAs in MSS (and SSS) (480). The proposal that high molecular weight PAHs, including B[a]P, could be removed from MSS by selective filtration was shown to be incorrect. Selective filtration from MSS is possible only with compounds that have an appreciable vapor pressure, that is, they are found in both the particulate and vapor phases of MSS. For example, the low molecular weight phenols and the volatile NNAs are sufficiently volatile to be selectively filtered from MSS, but the vapor pressures of most PAHs of interest (B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, B[a]A) are too low for selective filtration to be effective. B[a]P in MSS was proposed as an “indicator” of (a) the tumorigenicity of mainstream CSC to mouse skin, (b) the levels of PAHs with four or more rings, and (c) the levels of tumorigenic PAHs. In none of these cases is the level of B[a]P a valid “indicator.” (Similarly, phenol, proposed as an “indicator” of the level of low molecular weight promoting phenols in cigarette MSS, was shown not to be a valid “indicator.”) Assertions that the probability was extremely low that alkylated PAHs (methyl- and dimethyl-PAHs) would occur in tobacco smoke were demonstrated to be incorrect. Subsequently, even polyalkylated PAHs such as pentamethyl- and hexamethyl PAHs were identified in tobacco smoke, their major precursor being the high molecular weight tobacco terpenes such as solanesol [Snook et al. (3757)]. Assertions that cyclopentabenzanthracenes could not occur in tobacco smoke were incorrect. Numerous cyclopentabenzanthracenes were identified in MSS, their major
*
The concept of extraction of tobacco with an organic solvent to remove PAH precursors was not new. Roffo (3327) reported that extraction of tobacco with organic solvents such as ethyl alcohol, chloroform, acetone, petroleum ether, paraffin hydrocarbons, or benzene resulted in a reduction of the tumorigenicity of the tar generated by destructive distillation of the extracted tobacco compared to the tar generated by destructive distillation of the unextracted (control) tobacco. Roffo did not study the smokes from cigarettes fabricated with the extracted and unextracted tobaccos. He suggested that the extraction removed the phytosterols from the tobacco, which he considered the major precursor of the PAHs in the destructive distillate and in tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1182
11/24/08 12:38:58 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1183
H N N
Dibenz[a,h]acridine, I
N
Dibenz[a,j]acridine, II
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene, IV
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, III
Dibenz[a,j]anthracene, V
Figure XXVI-2 Structural similarity of several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and aza-arenes.
precursor being the phytosterols [Snook et al. (3736, 3756, 3758, 3759)]. PAHs in tobacco smoke are formed by either (a) a degradation-combination mechanism or (b) an aromatization mechanism involving a single molecule. Studies showed that both mechanisms are operative. To bolster several arguments concerning PAHs in MSS, it was incorrectly asserted by some investigators that the fate of an individual tobacco component during experimental pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere and at a temperature approximating that of the cigarette coal was the same as its fate in the tobacco matrix during the cigarette smoking process. This assertion was shown to be incorrect by several investigators, including Schmeltz et al. (3512), members of the same group that originally proposed the equivalency of the fate of tobacco components during pyrolysis and the smoking process. The tumorigenicity of CSC to mouse skin is due to its content of PAHs with four or more fused rings. Even though it was claimed that the PAHs are the only initiators in CSC, the levels and tumorigenicities of the PAHs in CSC accounted for no more than 2% to 2.5% of the observed tumorigenic response in mouse or other rodent skin-painting bioassays. With so many incorrect or equivocal assertions about the MSS PAHs issued by anti-tobacco smoking investigators over the last four decades (see Table XXVI-2), it was somewhat surprising that both OSHA and EPA were so willing to accept the premise that the thirteen PAHs in the HoffmannHecht and/or the OSHA lists contributed significantly to the alleged tumorigenic effects of MSS and ETS in the respiratory tract of active and passive smokers, respectively.
XXVI.A.2 Other Classes of Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens XXVI.A.2.a Aza-Arenes Within a few years of the discovery of the tumorigenicity to mouse skin of the PAHs DB[a,h]A (2078) and B[a]P (194, 796a, 797), investigations on the tumorigenicity of azaarenes began. The aza-arenes selected for study were those structurally related to the PAHs already demonstrated to be
tumorigenic. The first aza-arenes studied were those corresponding structurally to the dibenzanthracenes in which one meso-carbon was replaced by a nitrogen atom. From a comparison of their tumorigenicities (mouse skin-painting experiments), Barry et al. (194) reported that the tumorigenicity of several dibenzacridines was much less than the corresponding PAH, for example, dibenz[a,h]acridine {I} was reported to be much less tumorigenic than DB[a,h]A {IV} under the same experimental conditions. For the PAHs, much of the early research on their synthesis and tumorigenicity was conducted by the Kennaway group (Barry, Cook, Hewett, Hieger, Lindsey, Schoental) in the United Kingdom, by groups headed by Fieser and Newman in the United States, and by the Clar group in Germany. For the aza-arenes such as the benzacridines, much of the early research was conducted by the Lacassagne group (Buu-Hoï, Daudel, Lavit-Lamy, Zajdela) in France. It has been known for nearly six decades [see the review by Lacassagne et al. (2247a)] from the comparative tumorigenicity studies involving structurally similar PAHs and azaarenes (see Figure xxvi-2) that the aza-arenes are much less tumorigenic than the PAHs to mouse skin [compare DB[a,h] A {IV} vs. dibenz[a,h]acridine {I} and DB[a,j]A {V} vs. dibenz[a,j]acridine {I} or 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III}]. These observations on tumorigenicity plus the reported amounts of the three aza-arenes in cigarette MSS relative to the amount of B[a]P certainly raises doubts as to the importance of the aza-arenes as significant tobacco smoke tumorigens. In Table XXVI-1, B[a]P is listed as occurring in cigarette MSS in yields ranging from 20 to 40 ng/cigarette, whereas the yields of aza-arenes I, II, and III are listed at 0.1, 3 to 10, and 0.7 ng/cigarette, respectively. Even though a more realistic range for B[a]P in the MSS of cigarettes marketed over the past two decades would be 5 to 20 ng/cigarette rather than 20 to 40 ng/cigarette, the ratios of B[a]P yield to those of dibenz[a,h]acridine and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole are substantial. This of course assumes that the yields for the three aza-arenes that were included in Table XXVI-1 are correct! It is obvious that the listed aza-arene yields are not meaningful for recently manufactured cigarettes whose design includes technologies not used in the late 1950s and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1183
11/24/08 12:38:59 PM
1184
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-2 The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Paradoxes Assertion
Contradiction
Major source of PAHs in cigarette MSS is the lighting source (match, flammable fuel-charged lighter, gas burner in laboratory).
The PAH level in cigarette MSS was independent of lighting source: Cigarettes lit by an electric lighter gave the same PAH levels as those lit by matches, fuel-charged cigarette lighters, or a gas flame.
Because bulk pyrolysis of cigarette paper yielded PAHs, cigarette paper (representing about 5% of the cigarette weight) was defined as the major source of PAHs in cigarette MSS [Cooper et al. (817), Cardon et al. (594)].
Comparison of PAH yields, including B[a]P, produced by bulk pyrolysis of cigarette paper vs. pyrolysis of the paper in a cylindrical form approximating its configuration in the cigarette revealed that the cylindrical configuration combustion produced very little PAHs (or B[a]P) vs. bulk pyrolysis [Wright (4281)].
PAHs in cigarette MSS are the result of transfer of PAHs from the surface of air pollutant-contaminated tobacco to MSS.
MSS PAH level was not due to transfer of contaminant PAHs transfer from the tobacco rod to smoke: B[a]P injected into the tobacco rod produced very little increase in the MSS B[a]P level. Most of the injected B[a]P was destroyed during smoking process.
Since none of the factors noted above (means of cigarette lighting, cigarette paper, air pollutant contamination) was the source of PAHs in cigarette MSS, the source must be one or more of the tobacco components. However, even in 1957, the presence of B[a] P in tobacco smoke was questioned [cf. Fieser (1181)].
Because the fragmentary evidence presented, the presence of PAHs, particularly B[a]P, in tobacco smoke was questioned by such noted PAH experts as Fieser (1181) whose colleagues identified B[a]P in roasted coffee beans but were unable to identify it in tobacco smoke. Eventually, because of the isolation by Hoffmann of B[a]P in crystalline form from cigarette MSS (4307), its presence in MSS became universally accepted.
According to Wynder and Hoffmann, PAHs in cigarette smoke were the only major tumor initiators in mouse skin carcinogenesis (4332):
Mouse skin-painting studies with B[a]P solutions at concentrations much in excess of that in CSC produced no skin carcinomas in rabbits or mice [Wynder et al. (4351), Warshawsky et al. (26A180)]. Similarly, use of more reasonable doses of CSC in skin-painting studies instead of the massive doses usually used resulted in neither papilloma nor carcinoma formation [Wynder et al. (4351), Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), NCI (2683)].
The many detailed data obtained in studies of tobacco carcinogenesis on mouse skin exclude with some certainty that major tumor initiators other than the PAH type play a role in this assay system. B[a]P, because of its potency in skin-tumor carcinogenesis and level in MSS, was considered the major PAH of concern in tobacco smoke. In the 1981 Surgeon General’s report (4009), it is stated: Benzo[a]pyrene appears to be the most important single member of this class of compounds [the PAHs], taking into consideration both its concentration and its relative carcinogenic potency. Initially, Fieser did not believe the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate that B[a]P was present in tobacco smoke. He stated that if B[a]P were present, its precursor would be tobacco cellulose (1181).
Subsequent studies indicated the major precursors in tobacco of PAHs in its smoke were not cellulose and lignin but were the lipophilic tobacco components. Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3286, 3291) and Severson et al. (3616) reported that terpenoids, phytosterols, and saturated hydrocarbons were PAH precursors
Removal of lipophilic PAH precursors from tobacco by solvent extraction reduced the MSS PAH levels and the tumorigenicity (mouse skin-painting) of the CSC Wynder (4294), Wright (4282), Wynder and Wright (4354)]. This led to recommendations to remove the lipophilic tobacco components. Later, Wynder et al. (4332) minimized the effectiveness of the removal of the lipophilic tobacco components. Wynder and Hoffmann (4310) defined tobacco extraction as “impractical both technically and economically.” Wynder and Hecht (4306d) and the Surgeon General (4005) described tobacco extraction as “of academic interest.” Eventually, Wynder’s colleagues recommended addition of lipophilic compounds, e.g., n-hentriacontane, to tobacco (480) to offset effect of nitrate-derived NOx in NNA formation.
Biological activity of CSC from extracted tobacco was decreased but to a much lesser extent than decrease in MSS PAH (and B[a]P) yields. This resulted from two unanticipated effects of extraction on the tobacco and its smoke: Extracted lipophilic compounds included various inhibitors (saturated hydrocarbons) and anticarcinogens (a-tocopherol, b-sitosterol, cholesterol, D-limonene, duvanediols) which have been reported to offset the tumorigenicity of PAHs. • Residual tobacco after extraction contains higher levels of lignin, cellulose, and pectins. All of these generate promoting/ cocarcinogenic phenols during the smoking process: Levels of low molecular weight phenols in MSS were increased.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1184
11/24/08 12:38:59 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1185
Table XXVI-2 (Continued) The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Paradoxes Assertion
Contradiction
PAHs in cigarette smoke are generated by one or other of the following mechanism: • Organic compounds in tobacco are degraded to simpler molecules during the pyrolysis processes occurring in the burning cigarette and these simpler molecules recombine to PAHs (degradation-combination mechanism) [cf. Badger et al. (142, 143) and earlier papers]. • During the pyrolysis processes occurring in the burning cigarette, high molecular weight compounds in tobacco undergo unimolecular cyclization, dehydration, aromatization, ring expansion , etc. to form PAHs (aromatization reaction) [Rodgman and Cook (3269, 3286)].
The mechanism of PAH formation is not an either-or situation. Laboratory data indicated that both mechanisms were operative in PAH formation in the burning cigarette. Evidence for the unimolecular aromatization reaction was provided by pyrolysis data and cigarette “spiking” data with phytosterols. In this instance, the relatively high levels of chrysene and cyclopentaphenanthrene vs. B[a]P were more readily explained by the unimolecular aromatization of the tetracyclic sterol.
Inhaled cigarette smoke is the responsible agent for respiratory tract cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, in smokers. It was implied in the late 1950s and in the 1960s that the responsible agent in MSS may be the PAHs, particularly B[a]P.
Inhalation experiments with laboratory animals exposed for their lifetime to cigarette MSS consistently failed to produce pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma [Essenberg (1161-1163), Leuchtenberger et al. (26A81, 26A82, 26A83), Henry and Kouri (1621, 1622)], the lung tumor type reported to be associated with smoking in humans. Similar exposures of laboratory animals to vehicular exhaust gases produced pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma [Mauderly et al. (2505)]. Inhalation studies with B[a]P at levels comparable to those in cigarette MSS were consistently negative. Tumor production at extremely high levels of inhalation exposure to B[a]P were described as “equivocal” [RTECS (3085)]. From a study with roofers exposed via inhalation to levels of B[a]P equivalent to the daily inhalation of MSS from over 700 cigarettes, Selikoff et al. (3584a) concluded: If a high level of exposure to benzo[a]pyrene has any relation to lung cancer, the effect must be small…If a high level of occupational exposure to benzo[a] pyrene by way of inhalation results in little if any increase in the risk of lung cancer — then it seems unlikely that the extremely small amount of benzo[a] pyrene in cigarette smoke can account for the high degree of association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer.
Since B[a]P and other known tumorigenic PAHs account for so little (< 2%) of the observed biological effect in mouse skinpainting studies, two possibilities were proposed: A PAH whose tumorigenicity was equivalent to that of B[a]P was present at a substantially higher level (25 to 50 times) than B[a]P or there was an unknown “supercarcinogenic” PAH in CSC, present at a level similar to that of B[a]P but whose activity was 25 to 50 times that of B[a]P [Wright (4282)].
After a year and a half unsuccessful search, attempts to find either the highly tumorigenic PAH present at a high level or the “supercarcinogenic” PAH were discontinued [Wright (4282)]. Neither proposal has resurfaced since the late 1950s.
Since B[a]P in CSC acting alone accounts for less than 2% and the total PAH fraction accounts for less than 3% of the observed biological response in mouse skin-painting studies and no “supercarcinogenic” PAHs is present, additional mechanisms are needed to explain the biological effect: The mechanisms of promotion and cocarcinogenesis of tobacco smoke components (phenols, etc.) may explain the observed effect in skin-painting studies with CSC.
The promoting/cocarcinogenic effect of phenols on PAH tumorigenicity was offset by the following: • Removal of the low-molecular weight phenols by selective filtration of smoke “does not change significantly the biological activity of the resulting condensate.” [Hecht et al. (1582, 1583)]. • Phenol inhibited the tumorigenicity of PAHs such as B[a]P [Van Duuren et al. (4029, 4035)]. • Inclusion of known initiators, promoters, and cocarcinogens in tobacco smoke in the calculation explained less than 5% of the observed biological effect in skin-painting studies.
Wynder and Hoffmann (4317) reported that doubling the level of tumorigenic 17 PAHs in CSC produces “a statistically significant increase in tumor yield.”
The following contradictory evidence was reported: Increasing the B[a]P level in CSC by a factor of 10 produced no increase in the tumorigenicity of CSC [Roe (3310, 3311)]. Increasing the level of B[a]P by a factor of 30 produced no increase in the tumorigenicity of the CSC in mouse skin-painting studies [Lazar et al. (2320)]. (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1185
11/24/08 12:38:59 PM
1186
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-2 (Continued) The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Paradoxes Assertion
Contradiction
As proposed many times by Wynder, Hoffmann, and their colleagues (1766, 4304, 4317, 4319, 4330, 4355), the B[a]P level in CSC is an “indicator” (or “marker”) of the following: • The levels of the tetracyclic and higher PAHs, particularly those that are tumorigenic. • The tumorigenicity of the cigarette smoke condensate in mouse skin-painting studies.
Ample evidence indicated these premises are invalid: • No significant correlation between levels of B[a]P and other PAHs in pyrolysates from pyrolysis studies [Lam (2255, 2257)]. • Contradictory data provided from the studies of Wynder et al. (4355, 4356), Campbell and Lindsey (583), and Severson et al. (3616). • No significant correlation between levels of B[a]P and chrysene as reported by Rodgman and Cook (3269) or B[a]P and B[a]A [Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333) in cigarette smoking studies. • No significant correlation between tumorigenicity of over 130 test and reference CSCs to mouse skin and their B[a]P and/or B[a]A content [Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), NCI (2683)]. • In non-CSC-related studies, Warshawsky et al. (26A180) found in their study of the carcinogenic potential of mixtures that the carcinogenic “activity of a mixture cannot be accounted for by the level of benzo[a]pyrene present.”
Tumorigenicity of PAHs, e.g., B[a]P, is inhibited by representative hydrocarbons (C31H64 and C35H72) in the saturated hydrocarbon (SHC) fraction of CSC at SHC:B[a]P ratios much less than that found in CSC [4314, see p. 370 in (4332)].
Inhibitors and anticarcinogens more potent in their effect against PAHs than the saturated hydrocarbon fraction in mouse skin carcinogenesis were identified in CSC (phytosterols, a-tocopherol, duvanediols, D-limonene): Their concentrations relative to that of the PAHs are far in excess of that required to elicit anticarcinogenesis.
Reports of the presence of DMB[a]A in MSS CSC [Pietzsch (2962), Kröller (2191)] were criticized because “the formation of a dialkylated benz[a]anthracene during pyrolysis appears questionable.” [Cook (796), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)].
Snook et al. (3756, 3757) reported identification of numerous alkyl-, dialkyl-, and multialkyl-B[a]As in CSC. Subsequent research indicated a host of mono- to pentaalkyl-PAHs in the CSC. Their major precursors were tobacco terpenoid compounds, e.g., solanesol, neophytadiene.
Report of presence of 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene) in CSC [Kröller (2191)] was criticized by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332):
Several benzo[a]cyclopentanthracenes, structurally similar to 1,2-dihydro-3methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene (3-methylcholanthrene, a methylbenzo[a]cyclopent[fg] anthracene) have been identified in CSC: These included an unmethylated benzocyclopentanthracenes, originally reported erroneously as 1,2-dihydrobenz[j] aceanthrylene (cholanthrene) by Rodgman and Cook (3273), 2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[a] cyclopent[h]anthracene and 9,10-dihydro-9H-benzo[a]cyclopent[j]anthracene [Bonnet and Neukomm (394, 397-399), Ahlmann (39), Bonnet (392), Pyriki (3033), Rodgman and Cook (3273)].
Since this carcinogenic hydrocarbon has not yet been found in any other combustion product, it remains a doubtful assumption that it is present in tobacco smoke.
Dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (dibenzo[def,p]chrysene) is present in CSC and the pyrolysate from saturated tobacco hydrocarbons [Wynder et al. (4355)]. It was identified on the basis of agreement between spectral data for the isolate and those published for a synthetic PAH [Lyons and Johnston (2430), Lyons (2427, 2428), Wynder and Wright (4354), Rodgman and Cook (3273), Pyriki (3033), Bonnet and Neukomm (398, 399)].
Lavit-Lamy and Buu-Hoï (2314) demonstrated that the synthetic PAH originally defined as dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (dibenzo[def,p]chrysene) and spectrally identical with the tobacco smoke isolate was actually dibenz[a,e]aceanthrylene (dibenzo[a,e] fluoranthene), a fact accepted by Hoffmann and Wynder (1798). Dibenzo[def,p] chrysene (dibenzo[a,l]pyrene) was subsequently identified in tobacco smoke by Snook et al. (3756), but no quantitative data were reported. In citations of dibenzo[a,l]pyrene as a “tumorigenic agents in tobacco smoke,” Hoffmann and his coauthors (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773), IARC (1869, 1870), and EPA (1148) indicated only that it was “present.” Whether its “presence” was based on the erroneous dibenzo[a,l]pyrene reports from the 1950s or the authentic dibenzo[a,l]pyrene report of Snook et al. (3756) is unclear.
Addition of nitrate to the tobacco blend significantly reduced MSS yields of “tar,” PAHs, and phenols. The odd-electron compound NO generated during the smoking process interrupted the free radical mechanism of formation of PAHs [Hoffmann and Wynder (1797)]. The % tumor-bearing animals (%TBA) of the resulting CSC was also reduced by about 80%. On the basis of these results, nitrate addition or use of high-nitrate tobaccos was proposed.
Reductions in these deliveries were confirmed (3246, 3286), but they were less than those originally proposed. In fact, in the first NCI-TWG study (1329), doubling the nitrate level produced the following changes: “Tar”, -7%; phenanthrene, -9%; B[a]P, +23%; B[a]A, -17%; phenol, -10%; nitric oxide; +111%. Doubling the nitrate level decreased the %TBA by about 20%. Later data showed that adding nitrate increased volatile NNAs and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs) in smoke. Nitrate removal or use of low-nitrate tobaccos was proposed (Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480). Hoffmann and colleagues included NNAs and TSNAs in their list of tumorigens or carcinogens in tobacco smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1186
11/24/08 12:38:59 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1187
Table XXVI-2 (Continued) The Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Paradoxes Assertion
Contradiction
According to Hoffmann and Wynder, increasing the number of cuts/inch (decreasing the cut width) for the tobacco filler reduces the delivery of CSC and B[a]P (1793).
The 1963 Hoffmann-Wynder findings were not confirmed either at RJRT or in the NCI-TWG study on the first set of experimental cigarettes [Gori (1329)]. In the latter study, the B[a]P and B[a]A yield for the normal filler cut (32 cpi) were less than those for the coarse (20 cpi) and fine (60 cpi) cuts.
PAHs are removed selectively by filters treated with reagents (chloranil, picric acid, 2,4,7-trinitrofluorenone) that form stable complexes with individual PAHs [Szent-Gyorgi (3847)].
Complexing reagents such as chloranil or 2,4,7-trinitrofluorenone did not selectively reduce MSS yields of individual PAHs [Rodgman and Cook, (3275)]. The complexing agent is unable to react with the nonvolatile individual PAHs in the milieu of thousands of compounds in the particles of the smoke aerosol.
Because of the nature of the cigarette smoke aerosol, Wynder and Hoffmann (4311) considered selective filtration of a specific smoke component or class of smoke components such to be an “impossibility.” However, the next year, they reversed their view, noting that selective filtration is not “impossible.” [Wynder and Hoffmann (4314)].
Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) reversed their view on the impossibility of selective filtration when they found that relatively volatile smoke components, e.g., low molecular weight phenols, are selectively removed from the MSS by filters incorporating certain plasticizers such as triacetin [cf. Laurene et al. (2312)]. Some years later, the same phenomenon was observed with volatile NNAs [Fredrickson (1236), Brunnemann et al. (514)].
Single compound pyrolysis at 800 °C in an inert atmosphere (N2 or He) is equivalent to the conditions existing in a smoked cigarette [Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332)]. This proposal was an attempt to justify drawing conclusions on PAHs in MSS on the basis of pyrolysis data.
On the basis of numerous laboratory data, this premise was criticized by several investigators [Bell et al. (248), Benner et al. (276, 277), Schlotzhauer and Schmeltz (3466, 3467), Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722), Baker (163, 166, 167, 171a, 171b), Baker and Robinson (174d)]. Proponents of the equivalence of inert-atmosphere pyrolysis of a tobacco component and its behavior in a burning cigarette during the smoking process misinterpreted one set of data and disregarded another: The atmosphere immediately behind the burning coal is oxygen-deficient compared to the oxygen level of the air entering the cigarette at the lit end and the smoke exiting the cigarette at the mouthend but it is not oxygen-free. The oxygen level in the tobacco rod a short distance (1-2 mm) behind the tobacco rod-fire cone interface is influenced by diluting air entering the tobacco rod through the cigarette paper and this diluting air increases as the cigarette paper porosity increases. The ultimate contradiction was provided from the laboratory of the original claimants. Schmeltz et al. (3512) reported that the fate of radiolabeled nicotine on pyrolysis was entirely different from its fate in the smoking process: These results suggest to us that pyrolysis experiments may be of limited value for establishing the fate of nicotine and possibly other tobacco components in a burning cigarette.
Severson et al. (1979) describe “the pyrolytic conditions that yielded [PAH] profiles of tobacco pyrolyzates that could be correlated with [cigarette smoke condensate] profiles…”
The anticipated correlation was not attained: When the tobacco, a tobacco extract, and the residual extracted tobacco were pyrolyzed, neither the amounts obtained for the individual PAHs other than B[a]P, the phenols, nor the acids (volatile or nonvolatile) in the tobacco pyrolysate matched the totals of the amounts in the extract pyrolysate plus the amounts in the residual tobacco pyrolysate. For the individual PAHs (except for B[a]P) and the acids, the totals of the amounts from the extract pyrolysate plus residue pyrolysate were higher than the amounts from the tobacco pyrolysate. For the individual phenols, the opposite was the case: The totals were less!
Between the early 1950s and 1984, literally hundreds of articles were published on PAHs in tobacco smoke with particular emphasis on the tumorigenicity of many of them (3262, 3306a, 3306b, 3307, 3713, 3714).
Despite the many published articles prior to 1984 on PAHs in tobacco smoke, none of the authors contributing to the Searle-edited over 1400-page American Chemical Society’s monograph on chemical carcinogens (3568) mentioned any of the tumorigenic PAHs reported in cigarette smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1187
11/24/08 12:38:59 PM
1188
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
early 1960s when Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported their findings on aza-arenes in cigarette MSS. The listing of single delivery values rather than a range for dibenz[a,h]acridine (0.1 ng/cigarette) and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole (0.7 ng/cigarette) indicates the MSS yields cited are those reported from a single study, which appears to be that of Van Duuren et al. (4027). Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) cited their own unpublished 1963 findings [Candeli et al. (587)] that they could not detect dibenz[a,h]acridine in cigarette MSS. Such findings were never published in a peer-reviewed journal. Thus, the upper limit (10 ng/cigarette) of the range for MSS yield of dibenz[a,j]acridine is that reported by Hoffmann, co-author of all but one of the lists in Table XXVI-1. Single MSS yields for dibenz[a,h]acridine and 7Hdibenzo[c,g]carbazole in MSS based on a cigarette manufactured in 1959–1960 or 1963 are hardly representative of more recently manufactured cigarettes. It is well recognized that a variety of cigarette design technologies has progressively reduced the sales-weighted average mainstream TPM by almost 70% from 40 mg/cigarette in the early 1950s to less than 12 mg/cigarette currently. At the same time that the reduction of delivery of mainstream TPM was accomplished, the composition of the MSS was also altered. For example, for mainstream TPM, the B[a]P content—expressed as ng B[a]P/mg TPM—has decreased about 33% (from 1.2 ng/mg
TPM to 0.8 ng/mg TPM) during the same time period. The 1979 U.S. Surgeon General’s report (4005) summarized the B[a]P data for a commercial cigarette sold in the United States from 1954 to 1979. In addition to changes in the composition of mainstream TPM, changes in mainstream vaporphase composition also occurred. Nicotine and the tobacco proteins and amino acids are proposed as the major precursors of aza-arenes [Chortyk and Schlotzhauer (722)]. Thus, the decrease in cigarette nicotine content and delivery since 1960 should certainly influence the pyrogenesis of the dibenzacridines and dibenzocarbazole during the tobacco smoking process. The levels of nicotine in U.S. cigarette tobacco blends (and MSS) decreased on average more than 40% between 1960 and the late 1980s. In addition, inconsistencies among numerous isolation studies raise serious questions about the actual presence of these three aza-arenes in the MSS (or SSS) from cigarettes manufactured after the mid-1960s. Results from German, Japanese, and American groups of investigators on their search for dibenz[a,h]acridine {I}, dibenz[a,j]acridine {II}, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole {III} in mainstream CSC and/ or nicotine pyrolysates are summarized in Table XXVI-3. Only Van Duuren et al. (4027) in their published report and Candeli et al. (587) in their unpublished report have detected any of these three aza-arenes in cigarette MSS!
Table XXVI-3 Dibenz[a,h]Acridine {I}, Dibenz[a,j]Acridine {II}, and 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]Carbazole {III} in Nicotine Pyrolysates (Pyr) and Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Condensate (CSC) Dibenz[a,h]Acridine
Dibenz[a,j]Acridine
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]Carbazole
Investigators
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Pyr
CSC
Van Duuren et al. (4027) Candeli et al. (587), Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332) Kaburaki et al. (2006) Schmeltz et al. (3499) Schmeltz et al. (3512) Snook (3733) Snook et al. (3750) Grimmer et al. (1409) Kamata et al. (2021) Sasaki and Moldoveanu (3414) Rustemeier et al. (3370)
yes NE
yes no
yes NE
yes yes
no NE
yes NE
no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
NE NE no no no no no no no
no no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
NE NE no no no no no no yes
NE no no NE NE NE NE NE NE
NE NE no no no no NE NE NE
yes = Compound identified. no = Compound not found or identified. NE = Substrate not examined for compound in question. Examination of these results indicates that Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported the identification of the three N-heterocyclic compounds {I, II, and III} in mainstream CSC and two of them {I and II} in a nicotine pyrolysate; whereas, Candeli et al. (587) failed to identify {I} but did identify {II} in mainstream CSC. The 1963 Candeli et al. findings on {II} in mainstream CSC were not confirmed in 1979 by investigators (3512) from the same laboratory: Hoffmann participated in both the 1963 and 1979 studies. Two studies (3499, 3512) confirmed the 1960 report by Van Duuren et al. that 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole {III} was not present in a nicotine pyrolysate.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1188
11/24/08 12:38:59 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Examination of the results summarized in Table XXVI-3 indicates that Van Duuren et al. (4027) reported the identification of the three aza-arenes in mainstream CSC and two of them, {I} and {II}, in a nicotine pyrolysate. However, Candeli et al. (587) failed to identify {I} but did identify {II} in mainstream CSC. The Candeli et al. findings reported in 1963 on {II} in mainstream CSC were not confirmed in 1979 by investigators from the same laboratory [Schmeltz et al. (3512)]. Two later studies (3499, 3512) confirmed the 1960 finding by Van Duuren et al. that 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole was not present in a nicotine pyrolysate. Examination of the detailed chromatograms presented in a study on aza-arenes in MSS and SSS by Grimmer et al. (1409) indicates the presence of several benzacridines (benz[a]acridine, benz[c]acridine). However, no gas chromatographic peaks corresponding to standard dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine peaks are visible in the chromatograms of the aza-arene fraction from either the MSS or SSS. The failures by numerous talented research groups (Table XXVI-3) to detect the two dibenzacridines, {I} and {II}, in tobacco smoke cannot be attributed to difficulties or problems in the analytical procedures. Motohashi et al. (26A113) reviewed the analytical procedures that enabled investigators to identify several benzacridines and their homologs plus dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine in a variety of environmental samples (urban air, gasoline engine exhaust, Diesel engine exhaust, street dust, and sediment from lake, river, and salt-water sources). Motohashi et al. (26A113) also reviewed in some detail the reports by Schmeltz et al. (3499), Snook et al. (3750), Grimmer et al. (1409), and Kamata et al. (2021) on the identification of various benzacridines in tobacco smoke, but they did not mention the reported identification of dibenz[a,h]acridine and dibenz[a,j]acridine in MSS by Van Duuren et al. (4027). In summary, the situation with regard to the four azaarenes considered to be significant “tumorigens” in tobacco smoke by Hoffmann and his colleagues, OSHA (1994), and/ or EPA (which relied on the 1990 Hoffmann-Hecht list) is: • OSHA did not list quinoline as a significant tumorigen whereas EPA did. • Only one laboratory, that of Van Duuren, reported the presence of dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j] acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole, listed in Table XXVI-1 as tumorigens in tobacco smoke. • One other laboratory reported the presence of dibenz[a,j]acridine in MSS but not the other two aza-arenes [Candeli et al. (587), see Wynder and Hoffmann (4319, 4332)]. Candeli et al. reported the MSS yield for dibenz[a,j]acridine to be roughly four times that reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027). This disparity in per cigarette MSS yield should have triggered additional research on its presence and level in MSS. However, the 1963 finding by Candeli et al. has never appeared in a peer-reviewed journal.
1189
• Failure to detect the three aza-arenes dibenz[a,h] acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, and 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole in cigarette MSS and/or in nicotine pyrolysates was reported in at least nine studies conducted periodically between 1970 and 2002 (Table XXVI-3). • In comparable tumorigenicity studies, the azaarenes are much less tumorigenic to mouse skin than their corresponding PAH analogs and much less tumorigenic than B[a]P [Barry et al. (194)]. The MSS yields of the three aza-arenes listed by OSHA and EPA, if they are present at all in MSS, are much less than that of B[a]P. Even when the repeated failure to confirm their presence in tobacco smoke is ignored, the combination of their significantly lower levels vs. that of B[a]P of the three aza-arenes in cigarette MSS plus their significantly lower tumorigenicity in the mouse skin-painting bioassay raises serious questions about their inclusion in a table listing the “significant tumorigens in tobacco smoke.” XXVI.A.2.b N-Nitrosamines Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) did not acknowledge that the MSS yields listed for both the volatile N-nitrosamines (NNAs) and the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs) could be incorrect (and high) because of the artifactual formation of both types of NNAs during MSS (and SSS) collection for analysis as reported by Caldwell and Conner (573). EPA and OSHA accepted without question the mainstream volatile NNA and TSNA yields tabulated by Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) and cited by the U.S. Surgeon General in his 1989 report (4012). The artifactual formation of NNAs during the collection and analysis of MSS and SSS has been noted many times over the years and it has not been limited to the determination of NNAs in cigarette smoke. A similar problem was noted with the determination of NNAs in foodstuffs. Neurath et al. (2750) were one of the earliest groups of investigators to discuss this problem in cigarette smoke. More recently, Brunnemann et al. (457), from their study of the levels of NNAs in MSS and SSS, reported lower levels than previously reported for volatile NNAs in MSS, attributing the lower levels to the avoidance of artifactual formation of N-nitrosamines during smoke collection and analysis. They wrote: In fact, several of the cigarettes which were machine smoked earlier and analyzed without precautions, when smoked by us under the same conditions but with precautions, yielded 25 to 100% lower values for DMN [N-nitrosodimethylamine] and NPY [N-nitrosopyrrolidine] for the mainstream smoke. The nitrate content of the tobacco appears to be a determining factor for the concentration of volatile nitrosamines in the smoke. Selective removal of these nitrosamines does occur with cellulose acetate filter tips but not with charcoal filter tips.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1189
11/24/08 12:39:00 PM
1190
Guerin et al. [see p. 236 in (1445)], in their review of NNAs in ETS commented on four ETS-related studies, those of Brunnemann et al. (457), Stehlik et al. (3812), Matsushita and Mori (2495), and Klus et al. (2134a). Guerin et al. summarized the results on the determination of NNAs in natural and artificial ETS environments: The concentration of nitrosodimethylamine in commonly encountered ETS-contaminated indoor air is likely to range from <10–40 ng/m3. Nitrosodiethylamine and nitrosopyrrolidine are likely to be present at similar but lower concentrations. Extrapolating from studies of artificial environments suggest NNN and NNK concentrations in common environments will range from <1–3 ng/m3.
They also noted that occasionally, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) concentrations may show excursions to 100 ng/m3 or more.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
It was noted previously (Table XXVI-1) that many claims about PAHs in tobacco smoke, particularly those demonstrated to be tumorigenic to the skin of rodents, were subsequently demonstrated to be either incorrect or equivocal. However, the points of contention about NNAs in tobacco smoke are fewer than the number listed for tobacco smoke PAHs (see Table XXVI-4). XXVI.A.2.c N-Heterocyclic Amines While many of the N-heterocyclic amine mutagens are present in tobacco smoke, the extensive research on this class of compounds was initiated and extended because of their presence in many foodstuffs consumed by many people. Table XXVI-5 summarizes some details of these N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke.
Table XXVI-4 N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco Smoke Assertion
Contradiction
Druckrey and Preussmann (1057) proposed that conditions were appropriate (presence of nitrogen oxides, water, and secondary amines, pH < 7.0) in a burning cigarette for pyrogenesis of NNAs such as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA). Boyland et al. (422, 423) proposed that the presence in tobacco smoke of nornicotine and anabasine, nitrogen oxides, and water made it highly likely that N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and N’-nitrosoanabasine (NAB) would be formed. Serfontein and Hurter (3595, 3597) reported the identification of NNAs in cigarette MSS.
First claims by Serfontein and Hurter (3595, 3597) of identification of NNAs in cigarette MSS were challenged with counterclaims that NNAs were artifactually produced during smoke generation, collection, and analysis [cf. Neurath et al. (2751)]. Neurath et al. (2751) reported the presence of an NNA but subsequently discovered the identified compound was produced artifactually during the smoke processing.
Since volatile NNAs and TSNAs occur in tobacco, a part of the NNAs in cigarette MSS is a result of direct transfer of NNAs from tobacco to smoke, the remainder results from formation and transport during the smoking process [Adams et al. (29)]. For 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK), the transfer from tobacco to smoke ranges from 6.9 to 11.0% of the amount in the tobacco; this represents about 30% of the 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in MSS. The remainder in MSS is formed during the smoking process [Hoffmann et al. (1734), Hecht et al. (564)].
The premise of the pyrogenesis of NNN and NNK during the cigarette smoking process was challenged by Fischer et al. (1193, 1199) who reported that these compounds occur in cigarette MSS only by transfer from the tobacco rod.
The problem of artifactual formation of NNAs has persisted from the mid-1960s to the present [Neurath et al. (2751), Fredrickson (1236), Krull et al. (26A77), Eisenbrand et al. (26A27), Caldwell and Conner (573)]. Continual improvement in smoke collection and analytical procedures has progressively reduced the analytical error. TSNAs in CSC have little or no influence on the host response in skin-painting studies. Little of the volatile NNAs remain in the CSC after collection and preparation for the skin-painting bioassay. The only NNAs to consistently elicit a positive response at the application site in skin-painting studies are the alkyl-N-nitrosourethanes, none of which has been identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke to date.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1190
11/24/08 12:39:00 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1191
Table XXVI-4 (continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco Smoke Assertion
Contradiction
Hundreds of rodent skin-painting studies with CSC and its fractions have been conducted since the first successful production of carcinoma in mice painted with CSC [see (4319, 4332 and references cited), Gori (1329, 1330, 1332, 1333), NCI (2683)]. Even in the massive NCI decade-long study, no attempt was made to correlate NNA content with bioassay results. It was assumed, from studies with individual NNAs, that they had little if any influence on CSC tumorigenicity to mouse skin. Millions of dollars and thousands of hours expended since 1953 in conducting bioassays – particularly mouse skin-painting studies – did not adequately define the total tumorigenicity of CSC in laboratory animals. Precursors of NNAs in both tobacco and tobacco smoke are the proteins and amino acids (plus nitrate) for the volatile NNAs [Brunnemann et al. (481, 482), Hoffmann et al. (1694)] and nicotine and nicotine-related alkaloids (plus nitrate) for the TSNAs [Boyland et al. (422, 423), Rathkamp et al. (3080), Hecht et al. (1563, 1565)]. The levels of NNAs in tobacco and its smoke parallel the tobacco nitrate level [Morie and Sloan (2635), Hecht et al. (1576, 1578), Tso et al. (3985)]. Removal of lipophilic PAH precursors from tobacco by solvent extraction reduces the PAH yield in MSS and the tumorigenicity (mouse skin-painting) of the CSC [Wynder (4294), Wright (4281), Wynder et al. (4355, 4356)]. This led to their recommendations to remove lipophilic components from tobacco. Confirmation of the reduced levels of PAHs in MSS from cigarettes fabricated with organic solvent-extracted tobaccos was provided by Rodgman (3241, 3242, 3246) and Rodgman and Cook (3286).
Personnel from Wynder’s laboratory subsequently recommended the addition of lipophilic compounds, e.g., n-hentriacontane, to tobacco [Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480)] to reduce the generation during the smoking process of nitrate-derived nitrogen oxide which was postulated as a reactant in the formation of NNAs.
NNA formation in tobacco smoke involves the reaction of methyl nitrite and secondary amines [Rodgman and Cook (3286), Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)]. NNA formation in tobacco smoke involves reaction among secondary amines, nitrogen oxides, and water.
The proposal by Rodgman and by Wynder and Hoffmann (4332) that NNAs arise by reaction of methyl nitrite with secondary amines was shown to be invalid: Methyl nitrite in MSS is zero initially but during the period of tobacco smoke generation, collection, and analysis it is formed artifactually in tobacco smoke [Vilcins and Lephardt (4058)].
Despite the contradictory evidence that precludes the involvement of NNAs either collectively or individually not only in various bioassays with laboratory animals but also in respiratory tract cancer in cigarette smokers, some investigators still maintain that the “tumorigenicity” of cigarette smoke in humans is due to its PAH content and its content of the TSNA, NNK.
Individual NNAs, particularly the TSNAs, have little or no influence on CSC tumorigenicity in the skin-painting bioassay. Millions of dollars and thousands of hours have been expended since 1953 in conducting bioassays that do not adequately define the total tumorigenicity of cigarette smoke condensate in laboratory animals.
In 1991, Hecht and Hoffmann (1571a) wrote:
Inhalation studies with NNAs at levels comparable to those in cigarette MSS were consistently negative. Lung tumor production by exposure to extremely high inhalation levels of NNAs was classified as “equivocal”’ by the Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS) (3095).
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and NNK [4-(N-methyl-nitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone] are the major carcinogens involved in lung cancer induction by cigarette smoke… Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) also noted that NNK had not been tested in laboratory animals for tumorigenicity via inhalation.
Bioassay results in life-time inhalation studies with laboratory animals exposed to various cigarette MSSs show no relationship between tumor production and volatile NNAs and/or TSNA content.
On the basis of the following results, nitrate addition or use of high-nitrate tobaccos was proposed: Addition of nitrate to the tobacco blend significantly reduced MSS yields of “tar”, PAHs, and phenols. NO generated from nitrate during the smoking process interrupted the free-radical mechanism of formation of PAHs [Hoffmann and Wynder (1797, 1798)]. The tumorigenicity (% tumor-bearing animals) of the resulting CSC is also reduced.
Later, data showed that increasing the nitrate increases both the volatile NNAs and TSNAs in MSS. Even though an increased level of TSNAs in mainstream CSC was accompanied by decreased tumorigenicity of the CSC to mouse skin, it was subsequently proposed to remove nitrates from the tobacco or use low-nitrate tobaccos [Brunnemann and Hoffmann (480)]. However, several of the NNAs and TSNAs were included in the lists of “tumorigenic agents in tobacco and tobacco smoke.” (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1191
11/24/08 12:39:00 PM
1192
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-4 (continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco Smoke Assertion No volatile NNAs is considered a “marker” for other volatile NNAs in MSS; no TSNA is considered a “marker” for other TSNAs, either individual or total, in MSS. No NNAs – either a TSNA, a volatile NNA, or a nonvolatile NNA – is considered a “marker” for the tumorigenicity of CSC in the mouse skin-painting bioassay.
Contradiction As noted previously, as the level of nitrate in tobacco and subsequently the levels of the TSNAs in CSC increase, the tumorigenicity of cigarette smoke condensate to mouse skin decreases [Wynder and Hoffmann (4332), Hoffmann and Wynder (1801, 1802)] but its mutagenicity in the Ames system with Salmonella typhimurium increases [Mizusaki et al. (2569)].
The tumorigenicity of NNAs is inhibited by a variety of tobacco smoke components. For example, D-limonene is anticarcinogenic to NNK [Wattenberg and Coccia (26A187)], ethanol, n-butanol, and tert-butanol are anticarcinogenic to NNN [Waddell and Marlowe (26A178)], indole [Matsumoto et al. (26A97)], cholesterol [Cohen et al. (26A12)], b-sitosterol [Wattenberg (4149b)], 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid (gallic acid) [Mirvish et al. (2559c)] and its esters [Lo and Stich (26A87), Teel and Castonguay (26A172)] are anticarcinogenic to several of the NNAs in tobacco smoke [cf. Rodgman (3255, 3255a, 3257)]. Tobacco smoke not only contains other compounds such as long-chained fatty acids [Takeda et al. (26A171)] reported to diminish the tumorigenicity of various NNAs but also contains components structurally similar to compounds [(+)-catechin, esculetin, esculin [Liu and Castonguay (26A86), Teel and Castonguay (26A172)] that have been reported to act as antitumorigens and/or antimutagens to NNAs Various tobacco components and other compounds structurally similar to tobacco or smoke components are known to inhibit the N-nitrosation of secondary and tertiary amines to NNAs, a reaction known to occur among the nitrogen oxides, amino compounds, and water during the tobacco smoking process. These inhibitors of NNA formation include several primary amines, ascorbic acid and ascorbates [Mirvish et al. (26A112), Mirvish and Shubik (26A111), Archer et al. (26A03a), Mirvish (2559b, 26A104, 26A105)], indole, the tocopherols (particularly a-tocopherol) [Mergens et al. (26A100), Mirvish, (2559b)], the carotenes, several phenols, and polyphenolic compounds such as chlorogenic acid [cf. Brunnemann and Hoffmann (484, 486)]. NOTE: The effect of these compounds on the N-nitrosation reaction should be differentiated from the effect of some of the same compounds on the tumorigenicity or mutagenicity of various NNAs, e.g., inclusion of ascorbic acid or ascorbate in the reaction substantially reduces the yield of NNAs; administration of ascorbic acid with a tumorigenic NNA such as NNK substantially reduces the tumorigenicity in laboratory animals. Little study has been devoted to determining whether compounds such as those noted above would exert a beneficial effect on MSS properties if added to cigarette tobacco because of diminished N-nitrosation with resulting lower NNA yield or because of the simultaneous delivery of the antitumorigen or anti-mutagen together with the NNAs. Because of the nature of cigarette smoke aerosol, Wynder and Hoffmann (4311) considered selective filtration of a specific smoke component or class of smoke components such as the PAHs to be an “impossibility.”
Selective filtration is not “impossible.” Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) reversed their view on the impossibility of selective filtration when they found that relatively volatile smoke components, e.g., low molecular weight phenols, are selectively removed from MSS by filters incorporating certain plasticizers such as triacetin [cf. Laurene et al. (3211, 2312)]. Some years later, the same phenomenon was observed with volatile NNAs [Fredrickson (1236), Brunnemann et al. (514), Hoffmann et al. (1711)].
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1192
11/24/08 12:39:00 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1193
Table XXVI-4 (continued) N-Nitrosamines in Tobacco Smoke Assertion
Contradiction
Guerin et al. (1445) estimated the exposure to NNAs in ETS-filled rooms to be low:
NDMA < 10-40 ng/m3 NDEA 3 ng/m3 NNN < 1-3 ng/m3 NNK < 1-3 ng/m3
Consumers are exposed daily to NNAs from a variety of non-tobacco sources. Many foodstuffs, beverages, and cosmetics contain appreciable levels of some of the volatile NNAs also identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke [Magee and Barnes (2442), Sebranek and Cassens (26A142), Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990), Maga (2438), Bailey and Williams (158a)]. Daily nontobacco exposure (primarily dietary) to NNAs is estimated to exceed 1800 ng/person; daily nontobacco source exposure to NDMA is estimated to exceed 1100 ng/person [Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990)]. NOTE: These estimates are based on analytical data that may have included values for NNAs artifactually generated during the analytical procedure.
As in the case of the tumorigens whose activity has been shown to be substantially reduced by administration of anticarcinogens [see reviews (3255, 3257, 3300)], Lee et al. (2327c) reported that the mutagenicities (Ames test) of several N-heterocyclic amine mutagens, each of which shows inordinately high mutagenicity, are substantially reduced by CSC. The compounds studied by Lee et al. were 2-amino-6 -methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1), 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2), 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1), and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2), 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), and 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ).
Table XXVI-5 Summary of Tumorigenic N-Heterocyclic Amines in Tobacco Smoke IARC Evaluation of Evidence re Tumorigenicity in
Component AaC MeAaC Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 PhIP IQ MeIQ Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2 a
MSS Level ng/ciga 25-260 2-37 0.37-0.89 0.25-0.88 11-23 0.26 0.28-0.75 b 0.29-0.48 0.82-1.1
Laboratory Animals
Humans
sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient sufficient
— — — — possible probable probable — —
See cigarette MSS yields listed in Table XXVI-1 (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744). MeIQ was not listed in (1740, 1741, 1743, 1744) but was listed by Smith et al. (3714)
b
Table XXVI-6 summarizes the chronology of the studies dealing with the N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke and in commonly consumed foodstuffs.
XXVI.B Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens In preceding publications and earlier chapters: (1) the listing of numerous MSS components as significant toxicants was questioned [Rodgman and Green (3300)] and (2) the assertions that ingredients added to cigarette tobacco adversely affect the chemical and biological properties of MSS were shown to be in error [Rodgman (3266)]. In this section, we discuss the identified MSS components that have been shown in bioassays to significantly diminish the adverse biological effects of a number of the listed MSS toxicants. The toxicological properties of a MSS component asserted to adversely affect the smoker have generally been defined in one or more bioassays devoted to the study of the effect of the component administered individually to a host. In most cases other than numerous studies of tumorigenesis, the effect on the toxicological property of a specific compound by other compounds such as those in the complex MSS aerosol has not been studied. The toxicological effect of a specific component in MSS is usually derived by extrapolation from the effect observed in one or more bioassays with the individual component. It is known that the complex MSS aerosol has a significant effect on the chemistry of components in it. For example, (1) the rate of conversion of NO to NO2 is significantly less in the MSS aerosol than in a system comprising only NO and O2 (816) and (2) methyl nitrite reported as an MSS component is not formed during the smoking process but is formed during ageing of the MSS during the analytical procedure (4058). If the chemistry of an MSS aerosol component is altered by the presence of thousands of other aerosol components, then logic dictates that its toxicology will also be altered.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1193
11/24/08 12:39:00 PM
1194
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-6 Chronology of N-Heterocyclic Amine Studies Year
Event
1959
Only one fused ring N-heterocyclic compound was listed by Johnstone and Plimmer (1971) as a tobacco smoke component: the bicyclic compound, quinoline.
1960
Mold et al. (2592) isolated and identified the tricyclic N-heterocyclic 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) from CSC and defined its relationship to its precursor in tobacco, proline.
1961/ 1962
Poindexter and Carpenter (2972) reported the isolation and identification of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9Hpyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) from CSC. They reported that the yield of total harmans in burley and flue-cured MSSs was between 15 and 20 mg/g of tobacco smoked, values which were 40 to 50 times that of the harmans in the unsmoked tobacco. Since the weight of tobacco in cigarettes sold at that time approximated 1 gram, the yield of these two compounds was about 15-20 mg/cig. Poindexter and Carpenter concluded from experiments with radiolabeled tryptophan that the harmans (found to be radiolabeled in the MSS) were generated pyrogenetically by a reaction between aldehydes (formaldehyde for norharman, acetaldehyde for harman) and tryptophan in tobacco.
1962
Rodgman and Cook (3279) confirmed the presence in cigarette smoke condensate of 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine5,10-dione (pyrocoll) and also reported the identification of indole, carbazole, and several alkylated indoles and carbazoles. Rodgman and Cook (3279) also reviewed the previously reported biological studies on indole, 3-methylindole (skatole), and carbazole: None of the three was reported to be tumorigenic.
1964
Schmeltz et al. (3505) reported 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) as tobacco smoke components. Testa and Testa (3886, 3887) also identified 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) as components of CSC.
1964
The Advisory Committee to the U.S. Surgeon General (3999) briefly discussed only four fused-ring N-heterocyclic compounds in tobacco smoke, quinoline and the two dibenzacridines (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine) and the dibenzocarbazole (7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027).
1968
In his review of tobacco smoke composition, Stedman (3797) discussed the identification of tumorigenic N-heterocyclic compounds (dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole) reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027) as well as 5H,10Hdipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll) reported by Mold et al. (2592) and 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman), 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), and 9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole reported by Poindexter and Carpenter (2972).
1971/ 1972
Wakeham (4103) noted the reported presence of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) in cigarette MSS and discussed their formation from a reaction product of tryptophan and an aldehyde. As noted by Rodgman (3253a), the structure of the aldehyde reacting with tryptophan ultimately dictated the structure of alkylated norharmans found in CSC.
1974
In addition to 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), Izard et al. (1899) reported the identification of methyl-5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (methylpyrocoll) in CSC.
1974/ In a 1974 in-house RJRT report, a 1975 TCRC presentation, and a 1977 publication on their study of the water-soluble portion of 1975/ CSC, Schumacher et al. (3553) reported the identifications of 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman), 5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1, 1977 2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (pyrocoll), octahydro-5H,10H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1’,2’-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione (octahydropyrocoll), and 2-ethyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole. 1977
Sugimura et al. (3829) reported the isolation and identification of the N-heterocyclic amines 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) from tryptophan pyrolysates.
1977
In separate studies, Levitt et al. (2355a) and Nagao et al. (2667b) demonstrated the mutagenicity of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) in the Ames test.
1978
Yamamoto et al. (4365a) reported the isolation and identification of 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) from glutamic acid pyrolysates.
1978/ 1981
Heckman and Best (1587) reported the identification of nearly 270 previously unidentified and over 150 previously identified N-containing components in CSC. These included several components structurally similar to the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amine: 9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-pentyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole, 1-butyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 9H-1-propenylpyrido[3,4-b]indole, and a partially characterized norharman isomer.
1979
In the 1979 U.S. Surgeon General’s report (4005), the aza-arenes dibenz[a,h]acridine, dibenz[a,j]acridine, 7H-dibenzo[c,g] carbazole, quinoline, and alkylated quinolines in CSC were discussed but not the presence or properties of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines identified in tobacco smoke.
1980/ 1981
Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) and Matsumoto et al. (2492) reported the identification of 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) in CSC.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1194
11/24/08 12:39:00 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1195
Table XXVI-6 (continued) Chronology of N-Heterocyclic Amine Studies Year
Event
1981
Matsukura et al. (2491a) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in mice of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). Hosaka et al. (1835a) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). In the 1982 Surgeon General report (4010), 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) were classified as “toxic and tumorigenic agents of cigarette smoke” in amounts of 3.2 to 8.1 mg/cig and 1.1 to 3.1 mg/cig, respectively, in cigarette MSS. None of the other mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines in tobacco smoke was discussed. Snook and Chortyk (3739, 3740) reported the MSS yield of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) to be 1.2 to 13.4 mg/cig; that for 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman) to be 0.3 to 3.8 mg/cig. They found a linear relationship between the yield of cigarette MSS “tar” and the yields of 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman). In contrast to the 1962 findings of Poindexter and Carpenter (2972), Snook and Chortyk reported that the MSS yields of these two compounds were not influenced by the tobacco type. Demarini (933) reviewed the studies on the mutagenicity of CSC. He discussed the studies of Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388) and Matsumoto et al. (2492) on the mutagens 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) (80 ng/cig) and 2-amino-3-methyl-9Hpyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) (7 ng/cig). None of the authors contributing to the Searle-edited 1400-page American Chemical Society’s monograph on chemical carcinogens (3568) mentioned the tumorigenic and mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines reported in cigarette smoke and numerous cooked foods. Ohgaki et al. (2849b) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in mice and Takayama et al. (3862b) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) and 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2). Takayama et al. (3862c) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of the tobacco smoke component 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoline (IQ). Ohgaki et al. (2849, 2849a) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in mice of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), found in broiled fish, fried beef, beef extract, and CSC. Takayama et al. (3862d) demonstrated the tumorigenicity in rats of 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) and 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2). Tanaka et al. (3865c) demonstrated the tumorigenicity of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ). The IARC (1870) listed several tryptophan-derived tobacco smoke isolates including 9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (norharman) and 1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole (harman). The levels in cigarette MSS of these two components were listed as 9.5 to 14.1 and 2.5 to 5.8 mg/cig, respectively. No mention was made of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines in CSC or the degree of evidence for their carcinogenicity in animals and humans. Yamashita et al. (4367, 4368) identified and quantitated the following mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines in CSC:
1982
1982/ 1984
1983
1984 1984
1984/ 1985 1985
1985/ 1986
1985/ 1986
1986
2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) 0.3 ng/cig 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) 0.3 ng/cig 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) 0.2 ng/cig 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) 16.9 ng/cig 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) 1.6 ng/cig Sugimura (3828c) reviewed the isolation and identification of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines s, their high mutagenicity in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium) of several of them, their tumorigenicity, and their various sources – including CSC for many. However, Sugimura did write the following about the importance of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines as human carcinogens: Taking various factors into consideration, it is probably impractical and not realistic to make risk estimations from the carcinogenicity data on rodents given a single carcinogen. However, for a simple extrapolation of animal data for risk estimation, TD50 values, which are the doses needed to develop cancers in 50% of animals fed on carcinogens [IQ, Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, AaC, and MeAaC] for their life time, have been calculated based on mouse experiments… If we assume the average TD50 value of heterocyclic amines should be about 8mg/kg/day, we can roughly estimate the risk of these carcinogenic heterocyclic amines for human beings. The intake of heterocyclic amines was calculated from available data on their quantities in foods. Apparently the human intake is about 0.0002% times the TD50 obtained from animal data. This means that heterocyclic amines may not be so serious for human cancer development… On the other hand, it is also true that human beings are being exposed to many heterocyclic amines and many other carcinogens with tumor promoters and/or suppressing factors for carcinogenesis. At this moment, it is honest to state that no solid information on the estimation of risk of heterocyclic amines has been obtained in any direction, either positive or negative.
1990
Felton and Knize (1177d) reviewed the results of numerous studies on the mutagenicity and tumorigenicity of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines. (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1195
11/24/08 12:39:01 PM
1196
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-6 (continued) Chronology of N-Heterocyclic Amine Studies Year
Event
1994
Lee et al. (2327c) reported that the condensate from cigarette MSS significantly inhibited the mutagenicity of several N-heterocyclic aromatic amines as measured in the Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium, strain TA 98 in presence of S-9 mix. The mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines tested included: 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ) 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) The mutagenic activities of these mutagens were suppressed as much as 80% by addition of 50 to 100 mg of CSC per plate.
1997
Hoffmann and Hoffmann (1740) issued a revised list of tumorigenic components in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Their revision of the Hoffmann-Hecht (1727) list included, in addition to several vapor-phase components, eight of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines: 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ) 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2) 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC)
Except for tumorigenic effects, little has been reported on the effect of other components in the complex MSS aerosol on the toxicological properties of an individual component. The tumorigenicity of many MSS components has been discussed frequently and in great detail but little has been written about the biological activity of nontumorigenic MSS components reported to counteract the tumorigenicity in laboratory animals of the various tumorigens. Inhibitors of carcinogens or anticarcinogens are compounds that prevent tumor development. Wattenberg (26A186) divided them into three categories based on the time in the carcinogenic process when they are effective. The first category consists of compounds that prevent the formation of carcinogens from precursor substances, for example, ascorbic acid [Mirvish (26A103, 26A104)], tocopherols [Newmark and Mergens (26A116)], and phenols [Newmark and Mergens (26A116), Kuenzi et al. (2216)] which inhibit the formation of nitroso tumorigens from precursor amine and nitrite both in vivo and in vitro. The second category includes “blocking agents,” which inhibit carcinogenesis by preventing carcinogenic compounds from reaching or reacting with critical target sites in the tissues, for example, disulfiram [Wattenberg (26A183)], which inhibits the metabolism of symmetrical dimethylhydrazine to its carcinogenic metabolites [Fiala et al. (26A34)]. The last category of inhibitors, the “suppressing agents,” works by suppressing the expression of neoplasia in cells exposed to a carcinogenic agent. Retinoids are an example of this category.
In 1941, Shear and Leiter (3627) described in detail the many factors affecting tumorigenicity of a chemical. In the mid-1940s, several nontumorigenic aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, naphthalene, anthracene) administered with B[a] P or dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) significantly diminished the B[a]P and DB[a,h]A tumorigenicity (843, 844, 26A17). In recent lists of MSS toxicants, benzene, B[a]P, and DB[a,h]A are listed as significant tumorigens. Reported many times, however, is the noncarcinogenicity of benzene in the solvent-control group when it was used as the solvent for known or suspect tumorigens in skin-painting bioassays (1544, 3665). Steiner and Falk (3814) reported that benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A), categorized as either an extremely weak or an inactive mouse-skin tumorigen (983), significantly diminishes DB[a,h]A tumorigenicity when both DB[a,h]A and B[a]A are administered simultaneously by subcutaneous injection. Despite this and similar bioassay results plus the presence of B[a]A and DB[a,h]A in MSS, both are repeatedly categorized as significant tumorigens in cigarette MSS! Similar inhibition was reported with mixtures of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a] anthracene (DMB[a]A) and several inactive PAHs (1654). In subsequent studies, other nontumorigenic PAHs (phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene) were reported to be effective antitumorigens against B[a]P and DMB[a]A (976, 3686). The nontumorigenic hydrocarbons — benzene, naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene — are MSS components, present at per cigarette delivery levels
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1196
11/24/08 12:39:01 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
far in excess of those of B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, or any of the other PAHs classified as tobacco smoke toxicants. Much evidence collected since 1932 on the tumorigenicity of PAHs indicates their tumorigenicity is not inherent but depends on specific metabolites that comprise one or more epoxides, dihydroxy compounds, and dihydroxy epoxides. For B[a]P, more than a dozen metabolites are known and they show a range of tumorigenicities (983). Conversion of B[a]P in an inhaled MSS particle to a particular metabolite cannot be a simple process. The more than 500 PAHs in cigarette MSS range from bicyclic to decacyclic structures. In a variety of chemical reactions, the rate of reaction decreases as the molecular weight (number of rings) of the PAH increases. That is, with stoichiometric levels of the PAH and the reactant, bicyclic PAHs react faster than tricyclic PAHs, which in turn react faster than tetracyclic PAHs, etc. Diol, epoxide, and/or diol-epoxide metabolites structurally similar to those described for B[a]P have been reported for many PAHs, for example, naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, B[a]A, benzo[c]phenanthrene, pyrene, chrysene, DB[a,h]A, benzo[b]triphenylene, and DMB[a]A (983). All of these and structurally similar PAHs have been reported by Snook et al. as cigarette MSS components (3756). In a situation, such as the formation of metabolites, where an equimolar mixture of bicyclic through hexacyclic PAHs is present, a pentacyclic aromatic hydrocarbon such as B[a]P will form little of its metabolite(s) compared to the levels formed by a more reactive bicyclic or tricyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. Numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated that inclusion of equimolar quantities of lower molecular weight PAHs, such as phenanthrene or anthracene, inhibits the hydroxylation-epoxidation of B[a]P in hepatic microsomes (26A192). However, PAH data from Hoffmann and Wynder (1798) and Rodgman and Cook (3273) indicate the PAH classes (bicyclic, tricyclic, etc.) in MSS are present at significantly higher molar levels than the pentacyclic PAHs, which include B[a] P and DB[a,h]A. In an in vitro study, the nontumorigenic PAHs pyrene and fluoranthene significantly inhibited the binding of a tumorigenic PAH to calf thymus DNA (enzyme source = mouse skin homogenate) [Slaga and Boutwell (3683), Slaga et al. (3688)]. The in vitro inhibition of the hydroxylation reaction is paralleled by a reduction of in vivo tumorigenicity. Because of their vapor pressure properties, tumorigenic PAHs (B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, etc.) and aza-arenes are present primarily in the MSS particulate phase. Similarly, many of the reported anticarcinogens or inhibitors occur in the MSS particulate phase (3255, 3255a, 3257), for example, high molecular weight alkanes (1099), b-sitosterol and cholesterol (1099), a-tocopherol (3271, 3347), indole (3279), indole3-acetonitrile (1898), duvatrienediols (3361), and PAHs (anthracene, phenanthrene, pyrene, fluoranthene, B[e]P) [see (3255a)]. Despite the fact that the anticarcinogenicity of certain components of tobacco (1171) and tobacco smoke (1824, 1672a) and of tobacco smoke itself (1824) has been known for over four decades, most discussions are directed at them
1197
as toxicants. Seldom is any significant discussion directed at smoke components known to possess anticarcinogenic properties. In a brief 1964 review of the possibility of anticarcinogenic agents in tobacco smoke, Wynder and Hoffmann [see 296, 330 in (4319)] discussed the findings of Steiner and Falk (3814) and Kotin and Falk [see 489–490 in (26A76)] in their studies with potent and weakly tumorigenic PAHs in the subcutaneous injection bioassay as well as their own findings in the mouse skin-painting bioassay (4314, 4316). Ignored was the discussion by Kotin and Falk (26A76) on the anticarcinogenicity vs. B[a]P or vs. DB[a,h]A of nine PAHs (anthracene, benzo[a]fluorene, B[a]A, chrysene, pyrene, B[e]P, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, perylene), two aza-arenes (benzo[a]carbazole, benz[c]acridine), and 2-naphthol. All but the two aza-arenes had been identified in cigarette MSS prior to their 1964 review. Subsequently, the aza-arenes noted were identified as MSS components (3339, 3750). Earlier, Wynder and Hoffmann (4311) had reported on MSS components that inhibited the action of a “tumorigen” invariably listed as significant. The finding was an outgrowth of their investigation of the effect of organic solvent extraction of tobacco on the PAH content of MSS. Cigarettes fabricated from the extracted tobacco yielded lower quantities of B[a] P and DB[a,h]A in MSS (3240, 3242, 3262). Skin-painting bioassays with MSS CSCs from the control and extracted tobaccos gave a lower percentage of tumor-bearing animals (% TBA) in the group treated with the extracted tobacco CSC. However, the decrease in % TBA was considerably less than the percent decrease in the level of tumorigenic PAHs in the CSC (4307). One explanation for the difference was that the solvent extracted almost all the alkanes from the tobacco. Thus, the alkanes were absent from the MSS from extractedtobacco cigarettes. This fraction (constituting about 3% of MSS CSC) was reported to significantly inhibit the tumorigenicity of B[a]P (4311, 4314, 26A59). Mouse skin-painting studies with B[a]P and the alkanes n-hentriacontane and n-pentatriacontane at ratios of alkane: B[a]P of 20:1 and 100:1 for each alkane showed they significantly inhibited B[a]P tumorigenicity (4311, 4314, 26A59). The MSS of a cigarette delivering 20 mg of CSC contains about 0.6 mg (600000 ng) of the alkane fraction and 10 ng of B[a]P, an alkane fraction: B[a]P ratio of 60000:1, far in excess of the ratios that produced significant inhibition of B[a]P tumorigenicity [Wynder and Hoffmann (4311, 4319, see pp. 370–371 in (4332)]. Increasing the long-chained alkane level in CSC by 1% from ~3% (C12 to C30) to 4% by addition of crystalline alkanes isolated from CSC resulted in reduction of the tumorigenicity of the CSC from 40% TBA to 24% TBA. This result was dismissed as “not statistically significant.” Wynder and Hoffmann [see 245–247, 628 in (4332)] again discussed anticarcinogenic components of tobacco smoke: Any discussion of as complex a carcinogen as tobacco smoke should at least mention the existence of anticarcinogens. These are substances that reduce or “neutralize” the effect of a carcinogen by reacting with the carcinogen or a carcinogenic metabolite, thereby deactivating it, or by competing
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1197
11/24/08 12:39:01 PM
1198 for reaction with cell constituents, or by interfering with the resorption of a carcinogen … The existence of anticarcinogens, however, must be considered in evaluating any complex mixture such as tobacco smoke condensate … An explanation of the tumorigenic activity of tobacco smoke condensate in terms of single constituents is made more difficult by the presence of substances that may act as anticarcinogens and/ or absorption retarders, especially for tumorigenic agents. It is known that structurally related noncarcinogenic hydrocarbons can inhibit the effect of carcinogenic hydrocarbons … Several investigators have noticed some inhibition of tumor growth by tobacco smoke condensate … [including] Hoffman and Griffin [1672a] … Falk et al. [1174] … [and] Homburger and Treger [1823b] … it should not come as a surprise that a material which has been proved to be carcinogenic may also interfere with tumor development, if not with tumor initiation.
They also noted [see pp. 370–371, 628–629 in (4332)]: An explanation of the tumorigenic activity of tobacco smoke condensate in terms of single constituents is made more difficult by the presence of substances that may act as anticarcinogens and/or absorption retarders, especially for tumorigenic agents. It is known that structurally related noncarcinogenic hydrocarbons can inhibit the effect of carcinogenic hydrocarbons. The same interrelationship may apply to tumor-promoting and nontumor-promoting phenols.
Numerous compounds demonstrated in various bioassays to be highly effective anticarcinogens against many MSS toxicants have been identified in tobacco smoke at per cigarette delivery levels far in excess of those of the alleged tumorigens. Seldom have these anticarcinogenic MSS components been discussed in the numerous reviews of the biological properties of MSS. Even though some of the earliest data on MSS components, for example, the alkanes, that inhibit B[a]P tumorigenicity in the skin-painting bioassay were provided by Wynder and Hoffmann [4314, see 370–371, 628–629 in (4332)], they more often preferred to discuss alkanes as major precursors of tumorigenic PAHs in MSS [see 496–501 in (4332), 1798, 4314, 4342] rather than inhibitors of B[a]P tumorigenicity. MSS components reported to possess significant inhibitory or anticarcinogenic action against various tumorigenic PAHs and NNAs in MSS have been cataloged (3255, 3255a, 3257). Those opposed to cigarette smoking view the complex mixture MSS differently from other complex mixtures such as raw or cooked foods, gasoline and Diesel engine exhausts, factory effluents, etc. [see (1345, 3685)]. Most are reluctant to accept the premise that a nontumorigenic component will offset the tumorigenicity of a tumorigen in animals treated with the complex mixtures CSC, MSS, SSS, or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) containing the two (1773). Other MSS components may have also influenced the mouse skin-painting results obtained with control tobacco and extracted tobacco CSCs. Hexane extraction of tobacco not only removes alkane inhibitors, thus making impossible their transfer to MSS, but also removes substantial amounts
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
of b-sitosterol (4356), a-tocopherol (3271, 3347), indole (3279), duvatrienediols (3361, 3389), and D-limonene (765, 2174), thus eliminating or drastically reducing their transfer to MSS during smoking. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that: (1) these smoke components are present by transfer from tobacco to MSS during smoking and to SSS during smolder between puffs or they are generated during smoking; (2) the compounds listed are anticarcinogenic vs. several of the listed tumorigens, for example, PAHs, NNAs, and ethyl carbamate. However, in the 1950s, neither the identity of several of these tobacco or smoke components nor their anticarcinogenicity was known. Comparison of identified MSS components (1373) with lists of compounds (1177a, 3685) that possess inhibitory or anticarcinogenic action in tumorigenesis studies reveals not only that MSS contains many anticarcinogens but also that their MSS levels often exceed those of the components listed as significant tumorigens. Previously, we discussed a few inhibitory and anticarcinogenic MSS components, but they represent a small sample of the MSS components reported to exhibit such properties. From the review by Slaga and DiGiovanni (3685) and other reports (1177a), we compiled a list of MSS (and tobacco) components reported to counteract the tumorigenicity of MSS toxicants (Table XXVI-7A). From the per cigarette MSS deliveries (Table XXVI-7A), it may be calculated that the tumorigenic PAHs listed contribute from 4 to 10 mg/g of mainstream CSC. Nontumorigenic PAHs (naphthalene, anthracene, pyrene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, benzo[e]pyrene, and benzo[b]triphenylene) total 90 to 180 mg/g of CSC. The anticarcinogenic effect of nontumorigenic PAHs and weakly tumorigenic or nontumorigenic aza-arenes vs. carcinogenic PAHs has been known since the 1940s (3685, 3814). An interesting aspect of Table XXVI-7A is that it includes the dioxins as antitumorigens. Slaga and DiGiovanni (3685) summarized the studies in which dioxins were shown to interfere with the enzyme pathways responsible for tumorigenesis of several of the most potent PAHs. The dioxins were not listed as MSS toxicants in previous tabulations similar to Table XXVI-7A (3255, 3255a, 3257). In fact, only the 2001 Fowles-Bates toxicant list issued since 1990 (1217) included the dioxins even though their presence in MSS was known in 1980 (854). Is the omission of such MSS toxicants related in any way to the fact that dioxins are significant antitumorigens vs. some of the most potent mouse-skin tumorigenic PAHs present in MSS? The 1964 Advisory Committee, in Chapter 6 of its 1964 Report, mentions that twenty-seven nontumorigenic PAHs had been identified in MSS, but none by name [see Chapter 6, p. 55 in (3999)]. Was the omission of their identities related to the fact that several were known to be antitumorigenic to several potent mouse-skin tumorigens such as B[a]P? In Table XXVI-7A are listed only the two n-alkanes (C31 and C35) shown experimentally by Wynder and Hoffmann to reduce the tumorigenicity of B[a]P to mouse skin. However, the alkane listing in Table XXVI-7A could logically be
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1198
11/24/08 12:39:01 PM
1199
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-7A Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
CAS No.
630-04-6 630-07-9 7235-40-7 5989-27-5
Component Hydrocarbons, Aliphatic Saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons b Hentriacontane C31H64 Pentatriacontane C35H72 b,b-Carotene D-Limonene
Approximate Delivery, mg/g MSS CSC
Effective Against
AT, AMa
Representative References to Anticarcinogenicity, Inhibition, and/or Antimutagenicitye
30000
B[a]P
AT
Wynder and Hoffmann (4314)
15–50
DMB[a]A NNK
AT AT
Mathews-Roth (2486a) Wattenberg and Coccia (26A187) Homburger et al. (26A61) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) DiGiovanni et al. (976) DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga et al. (3686) DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga et al. (3686) Steiner and Falk (3814) Hoffmann and Wynder [unpublished data cited on pp. 246, 292 in (4332)] DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga et al. (3686) Slaga and Boutwell (3683) Slaga et al. (3686)
Hydrocarbons, Aromatic 71-43-2 91-20-3 120-12-7 85-01-8 206-44-0
Benzene Naphthalene Anthracene Phenanthrene Fluoranthene
480–1900 80–160 4–7 2–4 3–4
DB[a,i]P B[a]P, DB[a,h]A B[a]P, DB[a,h]A B[a]P, DB[a,h]A DMB[a]A DMB[a]A
AT AT AT AT AT AT
129-00-0
Pyrene
3–4
DMB[a]A
AT
56-55-3
Benz[a]anthracene
0.8–2.8
DB[a,h]A B[a]P
AT
192-97-2
Benzo[e]pyrene
0.2
DMB[a]A
AT
215-58-7
Benzo[b]triphenylenec
0.05
MC, DB[a,h]A, DMB[a]A
AT
64-17-5
Alcohols Ethanol
8–20
NNN NNN NNN NNN DMB[a]A
AT AM AT AT AT
Waddell and Marlowe (26A178) Farinati et al. (26A32) Waddell and Marlowe (26A178) Waddell and Marlowe (26A178) Saito et al. (3389)
12–25
DMB[a]A
AT
Saito et al. (3389)
DMB[a]A
AT
Shamberger (26A158)
NNA PAH NNA
AT AT
Wattenberg (4149b Yasukawa et al. (26A196) Cohen et al. (26A12)
NNA
AM
Takeda et al. (26A171)
NNA B[a]P
AT AT
B[a]P
AT
Mirvish et al. (2559c) Kallistratos (26A68) Kallistratos and Fasske (26A17) Wattenberg et al. (4149c)
B[a]P
AT
Wattenberg (4149b)
71-36-3 75-65-0 57605-80-8
83-46-5
1-Butanol 2-Propanol, 2-methyl- {tert-butanol} a-4,8,13-Cyclodecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)- {a-4,8,13-duvane1,3-diol} b-4,8,13-Cyclodecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-{b-4,8,13-duvane1,3-diol} 2,4,6,8-Nonatetraen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-9-(2,6,6trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (all-E)- {retinol} b-Sitosterol
57-88-5
Cholesterol
57-10-3 57-11-4 149-91-7 499-12-7
Acids Acids, long-chained aliphatic Palmitic acid C16H32O2 Stearic acid C18H36O2 Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy- {gallic acid} 1-Propene-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid {aconitic acid}
57605-81-9
68-26-8
331-39-5 1135-24-6
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl){cinnamic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-} {caffeic acid} 2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3-hydroxy-4methoxyphenyl)- {cinnamic acid, 3-hydroxy-4methoxy-} {ferulic acid}
400–550 120–240
(Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1199
11/24/08 12:39:02 PM
1200
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7A (continued) Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
CAS No. 614-60-8
Component
621-82-9
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(2-hydroxyphenyl){o-coumaric acid 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl- {cinnamic acid}
50-81-7
Lactones Ascorbic acid
91-64-5 108-29-2
2H-Benzopyran-2-one {coumarin} 3H-2-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl- {a-angelica lactone}
108-95-2
Phenols 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-{quercitin} Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy-, [1S-(1a,3b,4a,5a)]- {chlorogenic acid; 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid} Phenol
88-18-6 128-37-0
Phenol, 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl-
117-39-5 327-97-9 93451-46-8
150-76-5
Phenol, 4-methoxy-
59-02-9
a-Tocopherol {vitamin E}
305-01-1 520-18-3
120-72-9
771-51-7 83-67-0 58-08-2
Approximate Delivery, mg/g MSS CSC
1000–7000
400–600
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 6,7dihydroxy- {esculetin} 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3,5,7-trihydroxy-2(4-hydroxyphenyl)- {kaempferol} N-Containing Components Indole
Indole-3-acetonitrile 1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-3,7-dimethyl{theobromine} 1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7trimethyl- {caffeine}
54-11-5
Nicotine
494-97-3
Nornicotine
400–600
Effective Against
AT, AMa
Representative References to Anticarcinogenicity, Inhibition, and/or Antimutagenicitye
B[a]P
AT
Wattenberg et al. (4149c)
NPYR, NNN
AT
Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08)
DMB[a]A
AT
B[a]P, DMB[a]A B[a]P
AT AT
DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Wattenberg et al. (26A189) Wattenberg et al. (26A189)
DMB[a]A
AT
Kato et al. (2046a)
B[a]P
AT
Lesca (2351a)
B[a]P NNN. NPYR B[a]P B[a]P, DMB[a]A
AT
NNA CSC NNK
AT AM AT
Van Duuren et al. (4035) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Lam et al. (26A79) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Slaga et al. (3687) Wattenberg (26A182) Clapp et al. (26A11) Clapp et al. (26A10) Wattenberg et al. (4149c) Slaga et al. (3687) Shklar (3655a) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Viaje et al. (4049a) Weerapradist and Shklar (4159c) Thompson (26A175) Rosin (26A136) Teel and Castonguay (26A172)
AHR
AT
Puppala et al. (26A132)
NNA NNN, NPYR NNK B[a]P EC
AT
Matsumoto et al. (26A97) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Chung et al. (26A09) Wattenberg and Loub (26A190) Nomura (26A119)
EC DMB[a]A NNA, NMOR NNK NDMA NNAL NDMA NNAL
AT
NDEA 1,2-DMH B[a]P DMB[a]A MC, DMB[a]A DB[a,i]P 1,2-DMH
AT AT
AT AT
AT AT
AT AM AM AM AM
Nomura (26A119) Perchellet and Boutwell (26A126) Mirvish et al. (2559c) Schüller et al. (26A141) Lee et al. (2327b) Brown et al. (437) Lee et al. (2327b) Brown et al. (437)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1200
11/24/08 12:39:02 PM
1201
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-7A (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
CAS No. 486-56-6
622-78-6 121-79-4 75-15-0 52-90-4
108-31-6 7439-96-5 7782-49-2
Component
Approximate Delivery, mg/g MSS CSC
Cotinine Miscellaneous Components Benzene, (isothiocyanatomethyl)Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, propyl ester {propyl gallate} Carbon disulfide Cysteine Dioxin
Maleic anhydride Manganese Selenium Cigarette smoke condensate
Abbreviations B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene DB[a,h]A = dibenz[a,h]anthracene DB[a,i]P = dibenzo[a,i]pyrene = benzo[rst]pentaphene DMB[a]A = 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene 1,2-DMH = 1,2-dimethylhydrazine 7-MB[a]A = 7-methylbenz[a]anthracene 12-MB[a]A = 12-methylbenz[a]anthracene 5-MeC = 5-methylchrysene EC = ethyl carbamate Glu-P-1 = 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole Glu-P-2 = 2-aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d]imidazole PhIP = 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine IQ = 2-amino-3-methyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline
Effective Against
AT, AMa
Representative References to Anticarcinogenicity, Inhibition, and/or Antimutagenicitye
NDMA NNAL
AM AM
Lee et al. (2327b) Brown et al. (437)
DMB[a]A NNK
AT AT
1,2-DMH NDMA DMB[a]A, MC, B[a]P, 7-MB[a]A, 12-MB[a]A, 5-MeC, DB[a,h]A PAH, DMB[a]A B[a]P DMB[a]A NNA Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, IQ, MeIQd
AT AT AT
Wattenberg (26A184, 26A185) Lo and Stich (26A87) Teel and Castonguay (26A172) Wattenberg and Fiala (26A188) Lo and Stich (26A87) Berry et al. (26A06) Cohen et al. (26A13) DiGiovanni et al. (26A23)
AT AT AT AT AM
Klein (26A74) Sunderman et al. (3836a) Shamberger (26A157) Thompson (26A175) Lee et al. (2327c)
MC = 3-methylcholanthrene = 1,2-dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene NDMA = N-nitrosodimethylamine NNA = N-nitrosamine NNAL = 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol NNN = N’-nitrosonornicotine NNK = 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone NPYR = N-nitrosopyrrolidine PAH = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon AHR = aryl hydrocarbon receptor MeIQ = 2-amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline Trp-P-1 = 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole Trp-P-2 = 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole
AT = test for antitumorigenicity; AM = test for antimutagenicity. This fraction consists primarily of the n-, iso- (2-methyl-), and anteiso- (3-methyl-) alkanes from C15 to C40. c Benzo[b]triphenylene was formerly known as dibenz[a,c]anthracene. d Several of the highly mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines identified in cigarette smoke (and foods) by Sugimura and his colleagues (see Chapter XVII.F). a
b
increased because the total alkane fraction consisting of n-, iso-, and anteiso-alkanes reduced the tumorigenicity of B[a] P and presumably all of the alkanes could be involved in the tumorigenicity reduction. The number of identified components in the alkane fraction in tobacco smoke approximates seventy. The complete list of the identified tobacco smoke alkanes appears in Table I.A-10 in Chapter 1. The antitumorigens and antimutagens in Table XXVI-7A are presented in a slightly different way in Table XXVI-7B. Several of the significant PAH, NNA, and N-heterocyclic amine tumorigens or mutagens are listed in the same sequence
as in Table XXVI-1 and the tobacco smoke components that reduce or nullify their tumorigenicity or mutagenicity are listed for each. It is interesting to see how many tobacco smoke components have been reported to inhibit or reduce the potent tumorigenicity of B[a]P (eighteen in all) or DB[a,h] A or DMB[a]A (twenty in all). Here again, only two of the seventy alkanes examined for their inhibition of B[a]P tumorigenicity are included. In Table XXVI-7C, references are listed on various aspects (identification, quantitation, tobacco precursors, biological results, etc.) of the tobacco and tobacco smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1201
11/24/08 12:39:03 PM
1202
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7B Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component Affected
Anticarcinogen, Inhibitor, Antimutagen
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
maleic anhydride b-sitosterol
Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl-a
dioxin
a-tocopherol {vitamin E}
Benz[a]anthracene, 7,12-dimethyl- b
ascorbic acid benzene, (isothiocyanatomethyl)benzo[e]pyrene 2H-benzopyran-2-one {coumarin} 4H-1-benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7trihydroxy- {quercitin} benzo[b]triphenylene b,b-carotene a-4,8,13-cyclodecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1methylethyl) {a-4,8,13-duvane-1,3-diol} b-4,8,13-cyclodecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1methylethyl) {b-4,8,13-duvane-1,3-diol} dioxin
fluoranthene maleic anhydride 2,4,6,8-nonatetraen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-9-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (all-E)- {retinol} phenanthrene phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl-
phenol, 4-methoxy1H-purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl- {caffeine}
pyrene selenium a-tocopherol {vitamin E}
Benzo[rst]pentaphene {dibenzo[a,i]pyrene} Benzo[a]pyrene
D-limonene anthracene benz[a]anthracene benzene 2H-benzopyran-2-one {coumarin}
Reference Klein (26A74) Wattenberg (4149b) Yasukawa et al. (26A196) Berry et al. (26A06) Cohen et al. (26A13) DiGiovanni et al. (26A23) Shklar (3655a) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Viaje et al. (4049a) Weerapradist and Shklar (4159c) DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Wattenberg (26A184, 26A185) DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga et al. (3686) Wattenberg et al. (26A189) Kato et al. (2046a) Slaga and Boutwell (3683) Slaga et al. (3686) Mathews-Roth (2486a) Saito et al. (3389) Saito et al. (3389) Berry et al. (26A06) Cohen et al. (26A13) DiGiovanni et al. (26A23) DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga et al. (3686) Klein (26A74) Shamberger (26A158)
Slaga and Bracken (3684) Slaga et al. (3687) Wattenberg (26A182) Wattenberg et al. (4149c) Slaga et al. (3687) Nomura (26A119) Perchellet and Boutwell (26A126) Mirvish et al. (2559c) DiGiovanni et al. (976) Slaga et al. (3686) Shamberger (26A157) Shklar (3655a) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Viaje et al. (4049a) Weerapradist and Shklar (4159c) Homburger et al. (26A61) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Hoffmann and Wynder [unpublished data cited on pp. 246, 292 in (4332)] Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Wattenberg et al. (26A189)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1202
11/24/08 12:39:03 PM
1203
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-7B (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component Affected
Anticarcinogen, Inhibitor, Antimutagen
Benzo[a]pyrene (cont.)
cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5-trihydroxy-, [1S-(1a,3b,4a,5a)]- {chlorogenic acid, 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid} dioxin
3H-2-furanone, dihydro-5-methyl- {a-angelica lactone} hentriacontane C31H64 manganese naphthalene pentatriacontane C35H72 phenol phenol, 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl-
1-propene-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid {aconitic acid}
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
2-propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)- {cinnamic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-, caffeic acid} 2-propenoic acid, 3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl){cinnamic acid, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy-, ferulic acid} 2-propenoic acid, 3-(2-hydroxyphenyl)- {o-coumaric acid} anthracene benz[a]anthracene benzene benzo[b]triphenylene dioxin
naphthalene phenol, 4-methoxyN-Nitrosamines
benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy- {gallic acid} cholesterol indole palmitic acid C16H32O2 1H-purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl- {caffeine}
stearic acid C18H36O2 selenium b-sitosterol N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
cotinine cysteine nicotine nornicotine phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl2-propenoic, 3-phenyl- {cinnamic acid} phenol indole
Reference Lesca (2351a)
Berry et al. (26A06) Cohen et al. (26A13) DiGiovanni et al. (26A23) Wattenberg et al. (26A189) Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) Sunderman et al. (3836a) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Wynder and Hoffmann (4314) Van Duuren et al. (4035) Lam et al. (26A79) Slaga and Bracken (3684) Slaga et al. (3687) Wattenberg (26A182) Kallistratos (26A68) Kallistratos and Fasske (26A69) Wattenberg et al. (4149c) Wattenberg (4149b) Wattenberg et al. (4149c) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Steiner and Falk (3814) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Slaga and Boutwell (3683) Slaga et al. (3686) Berry et al. (26A06) Cohen et al. (26A13) DiGiovanni et al. (26A23) Crabtree (843, 844, 26A17) Wattenberg et al. (4149c) Slaga et al. (3687) Mirvish et al. (2559c) Cohen et al. (26A12) Matsumoto et al. (26A97) Takeda et al. (26A171) Nomura (26A119) Perchellet and Boutwell (26A126) Mirvish et al. (2559c) Takeda et al. (26A171) Thompson (26A175) Wattenberg (4149b) Yasukawa et al. (26A196) Lee et al. (2327b) Lo and Stich (26A87) Schüller et al. (26A141) Lee et al. (2327b) Clapp et al. (26A11) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1203
11/24/08 12:39:03 PM
1204
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7B (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component Affected N’-Nitrosonornicotine
4-(N-Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone
N-Nitrosomorpholine N-Heterocyclic Amines Glu-P-1 Glu-P-2 IQ MeIQ Trp-P-1 Trp-P-2
Anticarcinogen, Inhibitor, Antimutagen 1-butanol ethanol
Reference
2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, 6,7-dihydroxy- {esculetin} indole D-limonene nicotine 1H-purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl- {caffeine}
Waddell and Marlowe (26A178) Waddell and Marlowe (26A178) Farinati et al. (26A32) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Waddell and Marlowe (26A178) Chung et al. (26A07, 26A08) Lo and Stich (26A87) Teel and Castonguay (26A172) Teel and Castonguay (26A172) Chung et al. (26A09) Wattenberg and Coccia (26A187) Schüller et al. (26A141) Mirvish et al. (2559c)
cigarette smoke condensate cigarette smoke condensate cigarette smoke condensate cigarette smoke condensate cigarette smoke condensate cigarette smoke condensate
Lee et al. (2327c) Lee et al. (2327c) Lee et al. (2327c) Lee et al. (2327c) Lee et al. (2327c) Lee et al. (2327c)
indole phenol 2-propanol, 2-methyl- {tert-butanol} 2-propenoic, 3-phenyl- {cinnamic acid} benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, propyl ester {propyl gallate}
1,2-Dihydro-3-methylbenz[j]aceanthrylene = 3-methylcholanthrene, regarded as one of the most potent tumorigens to mouse skin known. Although it does not appear in any of the lists in Table XXVI-1 by Hoffmann and his colleagues, it is a tobacco smoke component. b 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene is regarded as one of the most potent tumorigens to mouse skin known. Although it does not appear in any of the lists in Table XXVI-1 by Hoffmann and his colleagues, it is a tobacco smoke component. a
components listed in Table XXVI-7A as known inhibitors, anticarcinogens, and antimutagens. For the reader’s benefit, the sequence of components in Table XXVI-7C is identical with that in Table XXVI-7A and the CAS nomenclature has been included in each case. In a review of antimutagens and inhibitors of mutagenesis, Ramel et al. (26A133) discussed the many antimutagens found naturally occurring in plants. They did not discuss tobacco specifically but did discuss the natural occurrence of the following antimutagens: a-tocopherol, 2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, 7-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one, and 3-phenyl-2-propenal. All four have been identified as tobacco components; all but 7-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one have been identified in MSS. Lee and Reed (2327d) investigated the antimutagenicity of nicotine vs. N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and nicotine vs. B[a]P in the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium TA 100). They observed that nicotine inhibits the mutagenicity of NDMA but not that of B[a]P. Although the mechanism of this antimutagenicity was not elucidated, the report by Murphy and Heilbrun (26A115) on the inhibition of NNN metabolism by nicotine suggests nicotine inhibition of NNA activation may be involved. Lee et al. (2327b) repeated their earlier experiment and not only confirmed the antimutagenic
effect of nicotine on NDMA but also demonstrated the similar activity of nornicotine and cotinine. Brown et al. (437) reported the antimutagenicity of nicotine and cotinine vs. 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL). Lee et al. (2327c) reported that CSC inhibits the mutagenic activity of several N-heterocyclic amines when tested in the Ames assay with Salmonella typhimurium TA 98 in the presence of the S-9 activation system. The mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines tested included Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, TrpP-1, Trp-P-2, IQ, and MeIQ. These compounds are among the most potent mutagens known (3828c, 3829, 3829a, 4365a, 4357, 4368). Several have also been reported to be tumorigenic in mammalian bioassays (1177d). In one of the first demonstrations of antimutagens in tobacco smoke, Lee et al. (2327c) reported that 50 to 100 mg of CSC per plate suppresses the mutagenic activity of these compounds by as much as 80%. Enzymatic studies indicate that CSC is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenase. Therefore, it appears that CSC exerts its antimutagenicity by inhibiting the P-450 system. Lee et al. (2327c) subsequently reported that fractionation of CSC gave fractions that showed low mutagenicity themselves but were significantly antimutagenic. Only a few of the listed MSS tumorigens have ever been tested for tumorigenicity to lung tissue by exposure of animals
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1204
11/24/08 12:39:03 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1205
Table XXVI-7C Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: The symbol (0) indicates the component identified in tobacco substitute smoke was not detected in tobacco smoke or vice versa.
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1205
11/24/08 12:39:04 PM
1206
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1206
11/24/08 12:39:04 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1207
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1207
11/24/08 12:39:05 PM
1208
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1208
11/24/08 12:39:06 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1209
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1209
11/24/08 12:39:07 PM
1210
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1210
11/24/08 12:39:10 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1211
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1211
11/24/08 12:39:10 PM
1212
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1212
11/24/08 12:39:11 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1213
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1213
11/24/08 12:39:12 PM
1214
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1214
11/24/08 12:39:13 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1215
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1215
11/24/08 12:39:14 PM
1216
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1216
11/24/08 12:39:15 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1217
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1217
11/24/08 12:39:16 PM
1218
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-7C (Continued) Anticarcinogens, Antitumorigens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
via inhalation. The results with all but one of the four MSS components (B[a]P, NDMA, NDEA, 210Po), tested via inhalation at dose levels substantially exceeding those in MSS, were rated “equivocal” (3095). Only 210Po, administered via inhalation at massive dose levels to rats, produced squamous cell carcinoma, the lung tumor type similar to that associated statistically with cigarette smoking. However, the U.S. Surgeon General (4005, 4010) and Hoffmann and Hecht (1727) discounted the effect of 210Po in MSS in lung cancer causation in active smokers. From the type of evidence available presently, it is doubtful that many of the toxicants should be included in the various lists. Examination of data and reports on the tobacco smoke components present in one or more of the many lists sustains the premise that it is inappropriate to use such lists as evidence of any relationship between exposure to MSS and lung cancer induction in smokers or exposure to ETS and lung cancer induction in nonsmokers. Several specific components could and should be excluded from the toxicant lists for reasons other than the failure to induce lung tumors via inhalation.
1. By the early 1960s, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene had been reported in MSS by several groups [see account in (3262)]. For its identification, the investigators
relied on a published UV spectrum purportedly that of synthetic dibenzo[a,l]pyrene (dibenzo[def,p] chrysene). However, in 1966 it was demonstrated that the published spectrum was that of an isomer, dibenz[a,e]aceanthrylene (dibenzo[a,e]fluoranthene) (2314). 2. Previously noted was the failure by many research groups between 1963 and 2000 to confirm the presence in MSS of the tumorigenic aza-arenes reported by Van Duuren et al. (4027). Dibenz[a,j] acridine was reported recently by Rustemeier et al. (3370). 3. The precursors of arsenic and NDELA in MSS have been banned from U.S. tobacco agronomy since 1952 and 1981, respectively.
XXVI.B.1 Alternate Exposures to Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens Examination of the tumorigens listed in Table XXVI-1 logically leads to the questions: What, if any, are the human exposures to the listed tumorigens other than MSS and/or ETS?
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1218
11/24/08 12:39:17 PM
1219
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Is the exposure to a given tumorigen less, more, or equal to that from cigarette smoke? A detailed account of such alternate exposures requires many pages and tables. Most tumorigens in Table XXVI-1 have many alternate sources. The one obvious exception is the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs) which, by definition, being tobacco specific, have no alternate. Table XXVI-8 is a brief list, with references, of alternate exposures to the major classes of tumorigens in tobacco smoke. The cited references provide tabulated details of human exposures to them. Subsequent to Table XXVI-8 are discussions and tables in which the alternate exposures to the four major tumorigen classes in tobacco smoke are presented in more detail.
XXVI.B.1.a Alternate Exposures to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Despite the ubiquity of PAHs in modern society, their presence in and their contribution to the alleged hazard of tobacco smoke have been repeatedly emphasized for nearly half a century but seldom are the other many sources and/or levels of exposure to PAHs currently acknowledged as they were in the 1930–1950 period. Daily exposure to PAHs by inhalation (MSS, ETS, air pollutants) may represent only a small part of the total daily exposure; other exposures to PAHs often substantially exceed exposure via inhalation. Exposures to various PAHs are summarized in two different forms in Tables XXVI-9 and XXVI-10. Results from many studies have been reported on the types and levels of PAHs, with particular emphasis on B[a]P, B[a]A, chrysene, benz[e]acephenanthrylene (benzo[b]fluoranthene), benzo[k]fluoranthene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, DB[a,h]A, and benzo[ghi]perylene. As noted by Menzie et al. (2533), all of these PAHs have been identified in exhausts or effluents from fossil fuel combustion sources, in soils, sediments, and water, and in a variety of commonly used foodstuffs. Although concern about PAHs in foodstuffs, particularly those arising pyrogenetically during cooking (grilling, broiling, roasting, etc.) predates the major concern over their presence in tobacco smoke, efforts to identify them in foodstuffs have been much less than for tobacco smoke. The number of PAHs identified in tobacco smoke exceeds 500, including several hundred derivatives where the positions of the alkyl groups have not been precisely defined (3757, 3758). PAHs identified in foodstuffs, both cooked and uncooked, number fewer than 150. Whether one considers the overall composition in general or the PAH fraction in particular, no other commercial product has been examined as extensively as tobacco or tobacco smoke. Many PAHs are components of foodstuffs in the average diet (see Tables XXVI-9 and XXVI-10). Except for 5-methylchrysene, PAHs listed in the many reports by Hoffmann and his colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808) and OSHA (2825) as tobacco and tobacco smoke “tumorigens” have been identified in many foodstuffs. Grasso discussed
Table XXVII-8 Exposures to Tumorigens and Mutagens from Sources Other than Mainstream and Environmental Tobacco Smoke Alternate Exposure
References
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Foodstuffs Bailey and Williams (158a) Grasso (1345) Lijinsky and Shubik (2364a, 2364b) Maga (2438) Neukomm and Bonnet (2715) Vaessen et al. (4014) Waldman et al. (4106) Beverages (coffee, tea, cocoa, etc.) Kuratsune (2237) Kuratsune and Hueper (2238) Maga (2438) Vehicle engine exhaust Grimmer (1399-1402, 1405, 1406a, 1406b) Lyons (2428) Mauderly et al. (2505) Strach (3821) Sawicki et al. (3419b, 3419c) Williams et al. (4247a) Wynder and Hoffmann (4315, 4316) Furnace effluents Mumford et al. (26A114) Aza-arenes Vehicle engine exhaust Furnace effluents N-Nitrosamines Foodstuffs
Beverages (coffee, tea, cocoa, water, etc.) Cosmetics Industrial exposure (rubber, leather, metal, and pharmaceutical industries) N-Heterocyclic Amines Foodstuffs
Beverages (coffee, tea, cocoa, etc.)
Metals Foodstuffs
Grimmer (1407a) Grimmer (1407b) Bailey and Williams (158a) Grasso (1345) Kröller (2205, 2206) Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) Mitch et al. (26A112a) Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990)
Bailey and Williams (158a) Jägerstad et al. (1916b) Matsumoto et al. (2492) Nagao et al. (2667f) Sugimura (3828b, 3828c, 3828e, 3828f) Sugimura and Nagao (3829b) Sugimura et al. (3829a) Tanaka et al. 3865c) Yasuda et al. (4382a) Aeschbacher and Würzner (38a) Kosugi et al. (2178b) Nagao et al. (2667d, 2667e) Grasso (1345)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1219
11/24/08 12:39:17 PM
1220
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-9 Personal Exposure to Tobacco Smoke Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Listed as Tumorigens Exposure Source Fish -Raw -Cooked -Smoked Oysters Mussels Meat -Frankfurters -Hamburgers -Bacon -Ham, smoked -Bologna -Sausage -Beef, broiled -Beef, roasted -Beef, barbecued -Poultry -Cholesterol, heated Dairy Products -Milk -Cheese
B[a]Aa
B[e]A
B[j]F
B[k]F
B[a]P
Chr
Chr, me
DB[a,h]A
NC
DB[b]C
B[rst]P
DB[d]P
IP
× × — × —
× × — — —
— — — — —
× × — — —
× × × × ×
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
—
—
× — — — — — — — — —
× — — — — — — — — —
× — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — —
—
×
— — — — — — — — — — —
—
× × × — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
—
× — — — — — — — — —
× × × × × × × × × × —
—
× — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — —
—
× — — —
× — — — — — — — — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
× ×
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— — — — —
× —
× —
× —
— — — — —
— — — × —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — — — —
— — —
×
× × ×
— — — — —
× —
Cereals -Puffed corn -Puffed oats -Puffed wheat -Barley malt -Bran Bread -Untoasted -Toasted
× ×
× × × × ×
— —
— —
— —
— —
× ×
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Beverages -Tea -Coffee, regular -Coffee, instant -Water -Bourbon -Scotch
— — — — — —
— — — × — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
× × × × × ×
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
— — — — — —
Fruits, Vegetables -Fresh -Potatoes, cooked -Potatoes, French fried -Endive -Spinach -Soybeans -Kale -Tomatoes -Apples -Prunes
× — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
× × × × × × × × × ×
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
× × ×
— — —
— — —
— — —
× × ×
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
— — —
Oils, cooking Coconut oil -Vegetable oil Mayonnaise
×
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1220
11/24/08 12:39:17 PM
1221
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-9 (continued) Personal Exposure to Tobacco Smoke Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Listed as Tumorigens Exposure Source
B[a]Aa
B[e]A
B[j]F
B[k]F
B[a]P
Chr
Chr, me
DB[a,h]A
NC
DB[b]C
B[rst]P
DB[d]P
IP
Margarine
×
—
—
—
×
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
MSS, SSS, ETS
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
Engine exhausts b, c, d
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
×
—
—
—
—
×
Tars, soots, oils, excluding ETS c
×
×
—
×
×
×
—
×
—
—
—
—
×
Oils, catalytically cracked
—
—
—
—
×
×
×
—
—
—
—
—
—
Vehicle tire carbon blacks
×
—
—
—
×
×
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Open-fire, coal combustion e
×
×
×
×
×
×
—
×
×
—
×
×
×
Urban atmospheres
×
—
—
—
×
×
×
—
—
—
—
—
—
B[a]A = benz[a]anthracene B[e]A = benz[e]acephenanthrylene = benzo[b]fluoranthene B[j]F = benzo[j]fluoranthene B[k]F = benzo[k]fluoranthene B[a]P = benzo[a]pyrene Chr = chrysene Chr, me = chrysene, 5-methyl-
DB[a,h]A = dibenz[a,h]anthracene NC = naphtho[1,2,3,4-def]chrysene = dibenzo[a,e]pyrene DB[b]C = dibenzo[b,def]chrysene = dibenzo[a,h]pyrene B[rst]P = benzo[rst]pentaphene = dibenzo[a,i]pyrene DB[d]P = dibenzo[def,p]chrysene = dibenzo[a,l]pyrene IP = indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene]
The PAHs listed also occur in MSS, SSS, and ETS. Wynder and Hoffmann (4315) c Williams et al. (4247a) d Grimmer et al. (1405) e Mumford et al. (26A114) a
b
the PAHs in foods and their significance [see p. 1213 in (1345)]: The significance of these low levels of PAH carcinogens in food is difficult to assess. Undoubtedly, they are among the most potent carcinogens known, and every effort should be made to reduce their concentration in food. There are no clear indications, however, that they cause human cancer … Furthermore, there are indications that low levels of [benzo[a]pyrene], probably one of the most potent of the PAH found in food, do not produce tumors in experimental animals. The repeated application of 1.25 mg of [benzo[a] pyrene] in acetone to the skin of mice for 68 weeks failed to produce tumors [Roe (3310, 3311)]; dietary intake of 100 ppm of [benzo[a]pyrene] or less also had no effect in mice [Neal and Rigdon (2687].
His comments on the carcinogenicity to humans of PAHs in ingested foods are equally applicable to the carcinogenicity to humans of the PAHs in inhaled cigarette MSS or ETS. Grasso noted that the following five PAHs were commonly found in foods: B[a]A, B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, benz[e]acephenanthrylene (benzo[b]fluoranthene), and benzo[k]fluoranthene; all listed by Hoffmann and his colleagues (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808) and OSHA (2825) as “tobacco smoke tumorigens.” Grasso also listed the ranges of B[a]A
and B[a]P levels found in a variety of commonly consumed foodstuffs. Maga (2438) listed sixty-five common foodstuffs containing PAHs. As did the list compiled by Grasso, Maga’s list included fruits and vegetables, dairy products, cereal products, legumes, beverages (including water), cooking oils, meat products, seafood products, and miscellaneous foodstuffs such as eggs, sugar, and olives. When many foodstuffs are heated during preparation, their PAH content increases dramatically, for example, a single serving of charcoalbroiled meat contains more than 600 times the B[a]P level in the MSS from one cigarette [Lijinsky and Shubik (2364a, 2364b)]. Estimates such as this one are usually based on the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) listing of total particulate matter (TPM), “tar,” nicotine, and CO deliveries plus an average value for the level of the B[a]P in the MSS TPM. Such comparisons between cigarettes and foodstuffs may yield estimates that are actually too low. For a given cigarette brand, the FTC numbers are obtained via precisely defined smoking regimen and analytical methods (preconditioned cigarettes: 25°C; relative humidity, 60%; conditioning time, 24 hr; and smoking parameters: 35-ml puff volume, 2-sec puff duration, 1 puff/min; 25°C, 60% relative humidity, cigarette smoked to a defined butt length). On the other hand:
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1221
11/24/08 12:39:18 PM
1222
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-10 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Sources Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon
Tobacco Smoke
Gasoline Engine Exhausta
Cooked Fishb
Broiled Hamburgerb
Barley Maltbh
Puffed Cerealsb
Common Foodsb
× × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
— —
— —
— —
— —
× —
× × — —
× × — —
— — —
×
× — — — —
× — — — — — — —
—
× —
× × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × × ×
Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-c Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl-d Benz[e]acephenanthrylenee Benz[a]anthracene Benz[a]anthracene, 7,12-dimethylBenzo[j]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene 11H-Benzo[b]fluorene Benzo[rst]pentaphenef Benzo[ghi]perylene Benzo[c]phenanthrene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[e]pyrene Benzo[b]triphenyleneg Chrysene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Dibenz[a,j]anthracene Dibenzo[e,l]pyrenei Indeno[1,2,3-cd]fluoranthene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
× × × —
—
× —
× —
× × —
× × — — — — — — —
× × × — × ×
× × × —
× × —
× — —
— —
× × × — × — — — — × — — — — — — — —
Wynder and Hoffmann (4315) Maga (2438) c Previously known as cholanthrene d Previously known as 3-methylcholanthrene e Previously known as benzo[b]fluoranthene f Previously known as dibenzo[a,i]pyrene g Previously known as dibenz[a,c]anthracene h Also contains a high level of N-nitrosodimethylamine i Also known as dibenzo[fg,op]naphthacene a
b
• Few smokers, if any, in the smoking of a cigarette take in the TPM amount found in the FTC determination. • Few smokers smoke their cigarettes to as short a butt length as in the FTC procedure. • Because of involvement in other tasks, smokers often place their cigarette in an ash tray for a brief time, thus missing one or more puffs on the cigarette. Few smokers take the number of puffs obtained for a given cigarette brand in the FTC procedure. The smoking machine used in the method never misses a puff on the cigarette under test! • The smoking machine used in the FTC procedure does not “exhale” as do smokers. It has been determined in numerous studies that cigarette smokers exhale between 10% and 50% of the TPM inspired during the puffs needed to consume the cigarette, thus retaining between 50% and 90% of the inspired TPM. All of these factors, if taken into account for a foodstuffcigarette comparison such as the one noted previously, will
increase the calculated number of cigarettes in the B[a]P comparison. Analysis of a foodstuff as elementary as bread reveals a B[a]P level of 0.23 ng/g (mainly in the crust); light toasting raised the B[a]P level to 0.39 ng/g; darker toasting raised it to 0.56 ng/g. For an average slice of bread (weight one ounce or approximately 30 g), these values would be about 7, 12, and 17 ng/slice. Maga also reported the dietary intake of B[a]P (charcoal-broiled meat excluded) averaged about 500 ng/day. From their analysis of human exposure to B[a]P, Waldman et al. (4106) reported in 1991 that “the range and magnitude of dietary exposures to benzo[a]pyrene” ranged from 2 to 500 ng/day and “were much greater than for inhalation (10 to 50 ng/[day]).” For some subjects, however, they found a dietary maximum of 1149 ng/day, despite omission of the contribution of B[a]P-containing beverages such as coffee. These B[a]P-intake estimates [Maga (2438), Waldman et al. (4106)] were lower than that reported by Hattemeyer-Frey and Travis (1551): 2200 ng/day (97% from diet; 3% from inhalation and water contamination). If B[a]P were tumorigenic in man and its threshold limit value were “zero,” the incidence
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1222
11/24/08 12:39:18 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-11 Levels of Benzo[a]pyrene and Benz[a]anthracene in Common Foodstuffs Foodstuff
Benzo[a]pyrene, ng/g
Fresh vegetables Vegetable oils Coconut oil Margarine Mayonnaise Coffee Tea Grain Oysters and mussels Smoked ham Smoked fish Smoked bonito Cooked sausage Singed meat Broiled meat Charcoal-broiled steak Broiled mackerel Barbecued beef Barbecued ribs Cigarette mainstream smoke a a
2.85-24.5 0.4-1.4 43.7 0.4-0.5 0.4 0.3-1.3 3.9 0.19-4.13 1.5-9.0 3.2 0.83 37 12.5-18.8 35-99 0.17-0.63 8.0 0.9 3.3 10.5 20-25
Benz[a]anthracene, ng/g 0.3-43.6 0.8-1.1 98.0 1.4-3.0 2.2 1.3-3.0 2.9-4.6 0.40-6.85 … 2.8 1.9 189 17.5-26.2 28-79 0.2-0.4 4.5 2.9 13.2 3.6 20-35
The total mainstream smoke (particulate phase plus vapor phase) from an 85-mm filtered cigarette smoked under FTC conditions approximates 0.5 g.
of digestive tract cancer would be substantially higher than it is. The data tabulated in Table XXVI-11 on B[a]P and B[a] A from Maga, Grasso, and other investigators of the PAHs in frequently consumed foodstuffs have been expanded in Table XXVI-12 to include the cigarette equivalents of various dietary items consumed at estimated per meal levels. The inhaled cigarette MSS particulate phase from one cigarette is assumed to deliver 10 ng of B[a]P and 12.5 ng of B[a]A to the smoker. The following situation, known to be contrary to experimentally determined fact, is also assumed: None of the MSS particulate phase, nor its B[a]P content, nor its B[a] A content is exhaled by the smoker. How do these exposures to B[a]P in the diet, etc., compare to the exposure to B[a]P in ETS? It is obvious that dietary intake of B[a]P far outweighs the intake of B[a]P via inhalation, including that inhaled in ETS. Guerin et al. (1445) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory discussed the contribution of ETS to indoor air PAH concentrations and tabulated their assessments of the situation. They noted: The data suggest that ETS contributes between 0.5 and 1 ng/m3 of BaP to indoor environments containing measurable ETScontamination … Excursions in BaP concentrations due to
1223
ETS in such environments reach approximately 2.5 ng/m3 … The magnitude of ETS-contribution [to PAH and BaP concentration] is generally small and is often difficult to consistently detect in most environments.
The daily intake of B[a]P from ETS may be estimated if the following assumptions are made: • The average hourly intake of air is independent of whether the host is awake or asleep and is 1 m3. • The B[a]P level due to ETS is at the high end of the range estimated by Guerin et al. (1992) to be 0.5 to 1 ng/m3. • None of the daily intake of B[a]P, whether from diet, ETS, and the like, is eliminated by exhalation, etc. Table XXVI-13 shows a comparison of the intake of B[a] P from ETS vs. the other B[a]P intakes discussed previously. XXVI.B.1.b Alternate Exposures to Aza-Arenes Even though, as indicated in Table XXVI-3 and the text accompanying it, the presence of the three pentacyclic N-heterocyclic compounds in tobacco smoke is equivocal, the alternate exposure to them and similar components is discussed below. In their 1956 review of angular benzacridines and dibenzacridines and their tumorigenicity, Lacassagne et al. (2247a) made the following interesting observation, pertinent to the alleged “carcinogenicity” of benzene, frequently used as a solvent in tumorigenicity studies in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s: These molecules [the angular benzacridines] are very soluble in benzene and acetone (two solvents currently used for the investigations of carcinogenic activity).
In addition to the exposure to acridines and benzacridines in tobacco smoke, other exposures to various acridines and benzacridines have been cataloged in the scientific literature. Many of the sources (Table XXVI-14) comprise environmental pollutants. Unlike the PAHs and the NNAs, nontobacco smoke exposure to the acridines and benzacridines does not include foods. However, exposures other than tobacco smoke to polycyclic nitrogen compounds include exposures to the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines in a variety of foods. XXVI.B.1.c Alternate Exposures to N-Nitrosamines Among several groups who have been involved in research on NNAs since soon after their tumorigenicity in laboratory animals was first reported by Magee and Barnes (2441a) are Barnes, Magee, and Schoental in the United Kingdom and Dontenwill, Druckrey, Preussmann, and Schmähl in Germany. From the German group, Preussmann has been a key contributor to our knowledge of N-nitrosamines. He has authored or co-authored research results and review articles continuously on NNAs since 1959. Initially, Preussmann was
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1223
11/24/08 12:39:18 PM
1224
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-12 Cigarette Equivalents of Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and Benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A) in Common Foodstuffs B[a]P
B[a]A
ng/g
ng/Servinga
Cigarette Equivalentb
ng/g
Fresh vegetables Vegetable oils Coconut oil Margarine Mayonnaise Coffee Tea Grain
2.85-24.5 0.4-1.4 43.7 0.4-0.5 0.4 0.3-1.3 3.9 0.19-4.13
325-2800 (4) 46-160 (4) 1245 (1) 11-14 (1) 23 (2) 17-74 (2) 222 (2) 22-471 (4)
32-280 5-16 125 1 2 2-7 22 2-47
0.3-43.6 0.8-1.1 98.0 1.4-3.0 2.2 1.3-3.0 2.9-4.6 0.40-6.85
34-4970 (4) 91-125 (40 2800 (1) 40-85 (1) 125 (2) 74-171 (2) 165-262 (2) 46-780 (4)
3-400 7-10 225 3-7 10 6-14 13-21 4-62
Bread, untoasted Bread, light toast (3 min) Bread, dark toast (5 min)
0.23 0.39 0.56
20 (3) 33 (3) 48 (3)
2 3 5
— — —
— — —
— — —
Oysters and mussels Smoked fish Smoked bonito Smoked whiting Broiled mackerel
1.5-9.0 0.83 37 6.9 0.9
171-1026 (4) 95 (4) 4218 (4) 787 (4) 103 (4)
17-103 10 422 79 10
— 1.9 189 — 2.9
— 217 (4) 21500 (4) — 330 (4)
— 17 1720 — 26
Smoked ham Cooked sausage
3.2 12.5-18.8
370 (4) 1425-2143 (4)
37 143-214
2.8 17.5-26.2
319 (4) 2000-2900 (4)
25 160-232
Singed meat
35-99
3990-11290 (4)
400-1130
28-79
3200-9000 (4)
256-720
Broiled meat Broiled hamburger, fatty Broiled hamburger, lean Charcoal-broiled steak
0.17-0.63 2.6 0 8.0
19-72 (4) 296 (4) 0 (4) 912 (4) 1824 (8)
Charcoal-broiled T-bone
50
Barbecued beef Barbecued pork Barbecued ribs Cigarette mainstream smokec
3.3 4.5 10.5 20-25
Foodstuff
2-7 30 0 9(4) 182 (8)
5700 (4) 11400 (8)
570 1140
376 (4) 513 (4) 1197 (4)
38 51 120
0.2-0.4 — — 4.5 1026 (8)
ng/Servinga
Cigarette Equivalentb
23-46 (4) — — 513 (4) 1026 (8)
2-4 — — 41 82
—
—
—
13.2 … 3.6 20-35
1500 (4) … 410 (4)
120 … 33
Number in parentheses indicate number of ounces consumed. B[a]P and B[a]A content calculated at level per ounce (28.5 g) consumed. Inhaled cigarette MSS particulate phase from one cigarette is assumed to deliver 10 ng of B[a]P and 12.5 ng of B[a]A to the smoker. The following, contrary to experimental fact, is also assumed: None of the MSS particulate phase, nor its B[a]P content, nor its B[a]A content is exhaled by the smoker. c The weight of the total MSS (vapor phase + particulate phase) from an 85-mm filtered cigarette smoked under FTC conditions approximates 0.5 g. a
b
Table XXVI-13 Comparison of Daily Dietary and Inhalation Intake of Benzo[a]pyrenea Study Maga (2438) Hattemeyer-Frey and Travis (1551) Waldman et al. (4106) From inhaled ETS
Type
B[a]P from Diet
B[a]P via Inhalation
Total B[a]P Intake
estimated measured measured estimated
— 2130 ng/day 2-500 ng/day b —
— 70 ng/day 10-50 ng/day 24 ng/day c
500 ng/day 2200 ng/day 12-550 ng/day b
Based on assumptions listed above. Dietary intakes as high as 1149 ng/day were noted. c Even if intake were at the excursion value of 2.5 ng/m3, the daily intake from ETS would be 60 ng.
a
b
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1224
11/24/08 12:39:18 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-14 Aza-Arenes Sources Other Than Tobacco Smoke Acridine/Benzacridine Source Automobile exhaust Coal-fired residential furnace emission Coal distillate
Reference Sawicki et al. (3419b), Williams et al. (4247a) Grimmer et al. (1407b)
Graebe and Caro (1334f), Kruber (2210a) Coal tar Lang and Eigen (2261a), Merli et al. (2534a) Crude oil Schmitter et al. (3519b), Grimmer et al. (1407a) High boiling petroleum distillate McKay et al. (2519a), Later et al. (26A80) Industrial stack effluent Sawicki et al. (3419a) Urban suspended particulate matter Sawicki et al. (3419c), Cautreels and van Cauwenberghe (636a), Dong et al. (1040a), Adams et al. (35)
involved with the investigation of the relationship between the structure of a NNA and its tumorigenicity [Druckrey et al. (1059)]. In 1962, Druckrey and Preussmann (1057) proposed the possibility of the formation of NNAs in tobacco smoke from the secondary amines, nitrogen oxides, and water present. For the next two decades, Preussmann investigated methods of NNA analysis [Preussmann et al. (26A129), Egan et al. (1112a)], tumorigenicity of various NNAs [Druckrey et al. (1056a, 1058), Habs et al. (1469a), Magee et al. (2443), Janzowski et al. (1921a, 1921b), Ketkar et al. (2086c, 2086d), Zerban et al. (26A197)], the involvement of nitrate and nitrite in NNA formation [Spiegelhalder et al. (26A165)], NNAs in foods [Spiegelhalder et al. (26A167)], beverages [Spiegelhalder et al. (26A166, 26A168)], and toiletries [Spiegelhalder and Preussmann (26A169)]. In the late 1980s, Preussmann returned to the study of NNAs in tobacco and tobacco smoke and the question of the possible endogenous formation of tobacco-specific NNAs in smokers [Tricker et al. (3944, 3945, 3953, 3954), Tricker and Preussmann (3946–3951), Fischer et al. (1191–1200); Spiegelhalder et al. (3773, 3774), Kumar et al. (2235)]. Discussing the escalation in publications on N-nitroso compounds, Preussmann (2989a) wrote: At present (1981), more than 1400 papers are published annually on the analysis, formation, chemistry, biochemistry, metabolism and biological effects of N-nitroso compounds. There is no equivocal and convincing evidence of carcinogenicity in humans of N-nitroso compounds. Therefore, an answer is needed to the question whether exposure to traces of these compounds from the general environment … poses a risk to human health. In this situation animal data must be extrapolated to man, with all the inherent uncertainties.
Preussmann and Stewart (2991) noted the exponential increase in publications on NNAs between 1972 and 1984 and
1225
estimated that about three papers were published daily on this topic in the scientific literature in 1983. They also cautioned: Patterns of investigations established with nitroso compounds are being extended to more structurally complex carcinogens. Yet the contribution of nitroso compounds to the burden of environmentally determined neoplasia in humans remains to be determined … The priority that might reasonably be placed on reducing human exposure to nitroso compounds could be better judged if the number of cancers likely to be affected by such measures were known.
Discussions in this chapter are limited primarily to the NNAs common to tobacco and tobacco smoke and the other exposures (foodstuffs, beverages, cosmetics, drugs, etc.). As described by Preussmann and Stewart (2991), various bioassays on laboratory animals have been conducted on over 220 different NNAs and 110 N-nitrosamides, over 330 in all. Fewer than sixty of these N-nitroso compounds have been identified in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke. Historically, the search for tumorigenic compounds in foodstuffs and beverages began in the early 1930s, shortly after the demonstration that the synthetic PAH DB[a,h]A [Kennaway and Hieger (2078)] and the coal tar isolate B[a]P [Cook et al. (796a, 797), Barry et al. (194)] were carcinogenic when painted on mouse skin and sarcogenic when injected subcutaneously. The initial investigations were limited to attempts to demonstrate the presence of these and similar PAHs in heated foodstuffs (meat, fish, etc.), particularly those containing cholesterol and its derivatives. Subsequent to the demonstration of the tumorigenicity in laboratory animals of NNAs such as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) [Barnes and Magee (192), Magee and Barnes (2441a)], the search for NNAs in commonly used foods and beverages began. Despite nearly half a century of study of food components tumorigenic to laboratory animals, caution was recommended as recently as 1984 in the interpretation of the laboratory findings, for example, Grasso (1345) in his review of carcinogens in food noted: Carcinogens occur at very low concentrations in food so that if any type of tumors result at all, the number is expected to be very low indeed. At present much thought is being given to the relative hazards of these levels and how they can be assessed. Certainly no firm association has been established between any human cancer and the low levels of carcinogens in food, but this problem may only reflect the imperfect state of current epidemiological investigations.
Despite hundreds of publications on the presence of NNAs in foods and beverages and the results of bioassays with NNAs in laboratory animals, Grasso also wrote: Despite intensive experimental investigations, however, the hazard to humans from small doses of nitrosamines present in our food and water are difficult to assess, and until further experimental evidence is available, no firm opinion can be given.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1225
11/24/08 12:39:19 PM
1226
This opinion is almost identical with that of Preussmann and Stewart (2991), who reviewed not only the human exposure to NNAs in foods, beverages, water, drugs, cosmetics, etc., but also exposure to the NNAs (volatile, nonvolatile, and tobacco specific) in tobacco products: Although estimates of the total human burden caused by exposure to nitroso carcinogens have been attempted …, we do not think that sufficient data exist for meaningful evaluation; therefore, estimation of nitrosamine contribution to human cancer risk is largely speculative. Premature calculations are liable to be misinterpreted by those who are not thoroughly familiar with the multitude of uncertainties and difficulties inherent in such calculations, especially when estimates of lifetime risks are based on such figures.
Table XXVI-15 lists the levels (ng/g) of several NNAs identified in commonly used foods and beverages. Table XXVI-16 summarizes the studies in which various NNAs were identified in foods and beverages. One of the earliest investigators of NNAs in foodstuffs was Kröller (2205), who identified N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in cheese. Kröller’s studies were not limited to possible tumorigens in foodstuffs. From 1963 through 1966, he also investigated the pyrosynthesis of PAHs, particularly B[a]P, in cigarette smoke and from various materials used in cigarette fabrication, for example, cigarette paper, adhesives, humectants, dyes, inks, flavorants, tobaccos [see summary in Wynder and Hoffmann (4332)]. Also included in Table XXVI-15 are data for the per cigarette deliveries of several NNAs identified in foods and beverages. From these data, comparisons of the relative exposures from foods, etc., and cigarette smoke are possible, for example, the per cigarette MSS range for NDMA has been reported as 0.1 to 180 ng (see Table XXVI-1). Since one ounce is approximately 30 g, a person eating 1 oz of fried bacon would be exposed to 3 to 840 ng of NDMA that is, 30 times 0.1 to 28 ng of NDMA. Similarly for cured meat, the per cigarette exposure of 0.1 to 180 ng should be compared to the dietary exposure of 30 to 2400 ng from eating 1 oz of cured meat. Also, compare the exposure to 30 to 60 ng/ cigarette of N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR) vs. 300 to 3150 ng NPYR from eating 1 oz of sausage! Over the years, numerous reports [see Neurath et al. (2751), Fredrickson (1236), Krull et al. (26A77), Eisenbrand et al. (26A27), Caldwell and Conner (573)] on the artifactual formation of NNAs during the collection and analysis of tobacco smoke and the various remedial procedures taken to minimize this problem have been published. Similar problems were noted by Wolff and Wasserman (26A195) on inflated levels of NNAs reported in foodstuffs and beverages. They expressed reservations about the validity of pre-1972 analytical methodology since later studies demonstrated that the earlier procedures introduced both artifact and error. Thus, the levels of NNAs reported in foodstuffs were actually lower than those reported prior to 1972. In 1986, Sen et al. (26A150) proposed improvements in analytical methodology to prevent artifactual formation and subsequent inflated levels of NNAs in rubber products; propyl gallate
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-15 N-Nitrosamines in Foods and Beverages (ng/g) Food or Beverage
NDMAa
NDEA
Meat Bacon, uncooked Bacon, fried Cured meats
1–9.5 0.1–28 1–80
≤ 40
Fish Fresh or frozen Salted or pickled Smoked, baked, or processed
3–18 1–35 6–177
Vegetables/vegetable oils Beans Vegetablesb Soybean oilc
NPYR
NPIP
≤17 3–44 10–105d
0 1
1–2 50–108
… 0–37
≤147
…
… … …
0 0 0–20
0–0.2 0 0–4
… … …
… … …
Cheeses
0.1-68
…
…
2–11
Beverages Water Alcohol beverages
0.8–3.3
0.1–1.83 … ≤0.1
…
≤10 0.1–180
ND–25
ND–9
Cigarette Mainstream Smoke (ng/cig) e
1–4
30–60
≤60d
NDMA = N-nitrosodimethylamine; NDEA = N-nitrosodiethylamine; NPYR = N-nitrosopyrrolidine; NPIP = N-nitrosopiperidine b 16 different vegetable species tested c Freshly refined d Levels in sausage e See Table XXVI-1 a
was demonstrated to be an effective inhibitor of N-nitrosation during the analytical procedure. A variety of investigations has been conducted during the past decade on exposures to NNAs, and a few will be cited here. Okieimen et al. (26A120) reported on the total NNAs content of beer, dairy products, bouillon cubes, and tobacco products. They reported that dairy products showed the lowest total value; bouillon cubes, the highest. Mandagere (2450a) reported on the high NNA levels in a variety of meats cured via a smoking process. Coker et al. (26A16) tested some 200 commercial foodstuffs for NNAs and noted the values for beverages were high, those for dairy products low. Craddock (26A18) and Sen (26A143) found NNA levels in Canadian foodstuffs and beverages to be similar to those for U.S. products. Since the review by Preussmann and Stewart (2991) on the tumorigenicity of NNAs and that by Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) on exposure to NNA tumorigens in the environment, numerous detailed reviews of NNA exposures (alcoholic beverages, meats, seafood, cosmetics, tobacco, rubber goods, metal cutting oils, pharmaceuticals, environment, and water) have been presented by Mejstrik et al. (26A99), Tricker and Preussmann (3946), Tricker et al. (3954), Ellen (26A30), and Matsui and Kaya (26A95).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1226
11/24/08 12:39:19 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1227
Table XXVI-16 Volatile and Nonvolatile N-Nitrosamines in Foodstuffs and Beverages N-Nitrosamine: Foodstuff/Beverage
Reference
Acetic acid, 2-methylnitrosamino)- [N-nitrososarcosine (NSAR)] Meat Hamburg and Kann (26A49) Beer (and malt) Pollock, (26A128), Sen et al. (26A156) 1-Butanamine, N-butyl-N-nitroso- [N-nitrosodibutylamine (NDBA)] Fish Huang et al. (26A63) Ethanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitroso- [N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA)] Bacon Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181) Fish Sen et al. (26A155), Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181), Fong and Chan (26A39, 26A40), Huang et al. (26A63) Cheese Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181) Powdered milk Maduagwu and Bassir (26A88) Beer (and malt) Spiegelhalder et al. (26A166), Scanlan et al. (26A139), Kawabata et al. (2058) Sen et al. (26A154) Gastric juices + nitrite Methanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso- [N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)] Meat, cured meat Wasserman et al. (26A181), Panalaks et al. (26A121, 26A122), Sen (26A142a), Spiegelhalder et al. (26A167), Eisenbrand (26A26), Helgason et al. (26A58) Bacon Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181), Vecchio et al. (26A177), Sen et al. (26A152) Fish Sen et al. (26A155), Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181), Fong and Chan (26A39, 26A40), Iyengar et al. (26A64), Havery and Fazio (26A51), Kawabata et al. (26A71), Maki et al. (26A90), Josefsson and Nygren (26A67), Matsui et al. (26A96), Huang et al. (26A63), Pedersen and Meyland (26A123) Nieper and Etzel (26A117), Röper (26A134), Röper et al. (26A135), Squid Kawabata et al. (26A71), Matsui et al. (26A96) Cheese Kröller (2205), Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181), Goodhead et al. (26A42), Havery et al., (26A55), Gough et al. (26A44), Eisenbrand et al. (26B16), Elgersma et al. (26A29); Danish Institute of Protein Chemistry (26A21), Spiegelhalder et al. (26A167), Eisenbrand (26A26) Powdered milk Maduagwu and Bassir (26A88), Libbey et al. (26A84), Lakritz and Pensabene (26A78), Havery et al. (26A52) , Sen and Seaman (26A147) Wheat flour Hedler and Marquardt (26A57) Beer (and malt) Sen and Dalpe (26A144), Goff and Fine (26A41), Spiegelhalder et al. (26A166, 26A167), Walker et al. (26A109), USFDA (26A176), Maki et al. (26A91, 26A92), Preussmann et al. (26A130, 26A131), Scanlan et al. (26A138, 26A139), Sen et al. (26A151), Stephany and Schüller (26A170), Eisenbrand (26A26), Havery et al. (26A54), Hotchkiss et al. (26A62), Sen and Seaman (26A146, 26A148), Slack and Wainwright (26A160), Kann et al. (26A70), Kawabata et al. (2058), Mangino et al. (26A93), Spiegelhalder (26A162), Jasinski (26A66), Scanlan et al. (26A139), Scanlan and Barbour (26A138) Scotch whiskey Goff and Fine (26A41) Brandy (French) Walker et al. (26A179) Other alcohol beverages Sen and Dalpe (26A144), Gough (26A43), Bassir and Maduagwu (26A05) Water Fine et al. (26A37, 26A38), Kimoto et al. (26A72), Mitch et al. (26A112a) Morpholine, 4-nitroso- [N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR)] Fish Fong and Chan (26A39, 26A40) Piperidine, 1-nitroso- [N-nitrosopiperidine (NPIP)] Meat, cured meat Spiegelhalder et al. (26A167), Eisenbrand (26A26) Bacon Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181), Vecchio et al. (26A177) Fish Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181) Squid Kawabata et al. (26A71), Matsui et al. (26A96) Cheese Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181) 1-Propanamine, N-nitroso-N-propyl- [N-nitrosodipropylamine (NDPA)] Fish Sen et al. (26A155), Huang et al. (26A63) Pyrrolidine, N-nitroso- [N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR)] Meat, cured meat Pensabene et al. (26A124), Spiegelhalder et al. (26A167), Eisenbrand (26A26), Theiler et al. (26A173), Alldrick et al. (26A01) Bacon Hansen et al. (26A50), Sen et al. (26A145, 26A153), Gough et al. (26A45), Havery et al. (26A53), Janzowski et al. (26A65), Cross and Bharucha (26A20), Gray and Randall (26A47), American Meat Institute (26A03), Nitrite Safety Council (26A118), Webb and Gough (26A191), Josefsson and Nygren (26A67), Fazio et al. (26A33), Gray (26A46), Pensabene et al. (26A125), Alldrick et al. (26A01), Vecchio et al. (26A177) (Continued)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1227
11/24/08 12:39:19 PM
1228
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-16 (continued) Volatile and Nonvolatile N-Nitrosamines in Foodstuffs and Beverages N-Nitrosamine: Foodstuff/Beverage Fish Cheese Beer (and malt)
Reference Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181), Kawabata et al. (26A71), Matsui et al. (26A96) Crosby et al. (26A19), Wasserman et al. (26A181) Spiegelhalder et al. (26A166), Scanlan et al. (26A139), Kawabata et al. (2058), Jasinski (26A66)
2-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-[N-nitrosoproline (NPRO)] Meat Pensabene et al. (26A124), Hamburg and Hamburg (26A48), Dennis et al. (26A22), Dunn and Stich (26A25), Helgason et al. (26A58), Sen and Seaman (26A148) Bacon Hansen et al. (26A50), Brunnemann et al. (509), Sen and Seaman (26A148), Massey et al. (26A94) Chicken Brunnemann et al. (509) Ham Brunnemann et al. (509) Toast Brunnemann et al. (509) Biscuits Brunnemann et al. (509) Cornflakes Brunnemann et al. (509) Beer (and malt) Pollock (26A128), Sen et al. (26A156), Brunnemann et al. (509) Diethanolamine, N-nitroso- [N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA)] Meat, cured Coker et al. (26A15)
The daily intake of NNAs from ETS may be estimated with these assumptions: • The average hourly intake of air is independent of whether the host is awake or asleep and is 1 m3. • The NNA level due to ETS is at the high end of the range estimated by Guerin et al. (1445) for the various NNAs, that is, 40 ng/m3 for N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), 3 ng/m3 for N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR), N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), and 4-(Nmethyl-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK). • None of the daily intake of the NNAs, whether from diet, ETS, and the like, is eliminated by exhalation, etc. • The measured values reported for NNAs in diet, ETS, etc. From the dietary NNA data of Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990), Preussmann et al. (26A130), and Spiegelhalder et al. (26A167) and environmental tobacco smoke NNA data summarized by Guerin et al. (1445), the comparison in Table XXVI-17 was developed. It is obvious that the estimated exposure to the NNAs in diet vs. ETS differs from the B[a]P exposure case. Whereas the dietary exposure to B[a]P was between twenty and ninety times the exposure to B[a]P in ETS, the dietary exposure to NNAs is essentially the same as the exposure to NNAs in ETS. Previously, the review by Holcomb (26A60), his proportioning of male and female respiration rates during the day, his use of 11% particle retention, and his comments on the contribution of ETS to PAH exposure, were discussed. His summary of the NNA situation was:
Two studies [Stehlik et al. (3812), Hoffmann et al. (1678)] have reported the presence of … (NDEA) and … (NDMA) in smoke-filled rooms … These are not tobacco-specific nitrosamines. The lack of reported background levels and the unusually high level of smoking prevents the evaluation of ETS contribution of these substances. Other nitrosamines reported to be found in tobacco smoke have either not been monitored or not been reported in ambient air where ETS is present.
Unlike the volatile NNAs, which are found primarily in the vapor phase, TSNAs are predominantly particulate-phase components.* Thus, their intake and retention should be proportional to the intake and retention of ETS particles. If Holcomb’s assigned values for respiration rates during the day and his use of 11% retention are applied to the TSNA values in the above summary, the intake of NNN plus NNK will be much less than the 144 ng/day indicated. It probably would be less than 10 ng/day. If the more recent data of McAughey et al. (26A98) for the percent retention of particulates from aged and diluted SSS is used in the calculations (17% to 41%, depending on analytical procedure and subjects’ gender), the estimated exposure to NNN plus NNK will not be as low as if the 11% retention from the Hiller et al. (1654a, 1654b) study is used. Brunnemann et al. (460) determined the levels of several TSNAs in bars (3), restaurants (2), a car, trains (2), an office, and a smoker’s private residence. The values reported and the subsequent descriptions of the values found are shown in Table xxvi-18. In their discussion of exposure to TSNAs in ETS at various sites, Hoffmann et al. (1702)—perhaps to embellish the situation—apparently disregarded the fact that no NNN nor *
Although data are sparse, there is some evidence to indicate that TSNAs in ETS may be distributed between the vapor and particulate phases.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1228
11/24/08 12:39:19 PM
1229
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
Table XXVI-17 Comparison of Dietary and Environmental Tobacco Smoke Dietary Intake, ng/Day Country
NDMA
Federal Republic of Germany United Kingdom Japan The Netherlands
NDEA
1100a
NPYR
NPIP
Total
100–150
10
1210–1260 530 1780 1100
Intake from ETSb, ng/day
Estimated from German, Japanese, and American ETS studiesc
NDMA
NDEA
NPYR
960
72
72
NPIP
NNN + NNK
Total
144
1248
Because of the reduction in N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) level in beer after 1979, this number is now probably closer to 700 ng/day. On basis of the assumptions listed previously. c Brunnemann et al. (457), Stehlik et al. (3812), Matsushita and Mori (2495), Klus et al. (26A75); unfortunately, the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine results from a more recent study on ETS by Brunnemann et al. (1992) were not included in the assessment by Guerin et al. (1445) or Holcomb (26A60). a
b
N’-anatabine was detected in half the test sites! Hoffmann et al. (1702) list total TSNAs in the MSS from two different U.S. cigarettes at 979 and 670 ng/cigarette. Thus, at an exposure level of 62 ng/m3 and a respiration rate of 1 m3/hr, it would require a nonsmoker to remain for nearly 16 and 11 hours in such an atmosphere to be exposed to similar levels of TSNAs as a smoker who inhales MSS from the two cigarettes, respectively. Such a period surely exceeds the “several hours” noted by Hoffmann et al. (1702). Analysis of sixty-eight commercially available drug preparations containing aminopyrine indicated that all contained NDMA [Schoenhard et al. (26A140)]. The following ranges for the NDMA levels were reported: thirty-five samples, 1 to 10 ppb; twenty-seven samples, 11 to 50 ppb; five samples, 51 to 100 ppb; one sample, 370 ppb. More recently, Preussmann Table XXVI-18 Tobacco-Specific N-Nitrosamines in Indoor Air TSNAs in indoor air, ng/m3
Reference Brunnemann et al. (460) Hoffmann et al. (1702) a b
NNN
NAT
NNK
Total of 3 TSNAs
NDa b–22.8
NDb–9.5
1.4–29.3
1.4–61.6
1.8–23
1.5–10
1–29
4.3–62
ND = not detected Not detected in 5 of the 10 sites monitored (a restaurant, both trains, the office, smoker’s residence)
and Eisenbrand (2990), Mejstrik et al. (26A99), Lijinsky (26A85), Ellen (26A30), and Matsui and Kaya (26A95) have reviewed the studies on the detection of NNAs in pharmaceuticals as well as in other consumer products. Examination by Fan et al. (26A31) of a series of cosmetics widely used in the United States revealed that twenty-seven of twenty-nine samples contained NDELA at levels varying from 1 to 48000 ppb. From a similar study conducted several years later, Klein et al. (26A73) reported that five of ten cosmetic samples contained NDELA at levels ranging from 20 to 4113 ppb. Despite the concern about the possible tumorigenicity of NDELA, its use in cosmetics has continued since its ban as an agricultural chemical in the United States in 1981 (1147). Although none of the three has been identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke to date, N-nitrosomethyldodecylamine (in six of seven products tested), N-nitrosomethyloctadecylamine, and N-nitrosobenzylmethylamine were identified in 1981 by Hecht (26A56) in various commonly used cosmetics. Fan et al. (26A31) described an analytical method to determine NDELA in various cosmetics and shampoos; this procedure was updated by Fine (26A36). Erickson et al. (1159) reported the presence of NDELA and similar compounds in cosmetics. Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) commented on the rapid absorption of NDELA in rats when administered by a variety of routes (subcutaneous, oral, and intratracheal). Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990), Mejstrik et al. (26A99), Ellen (26A30), Lijinsky (26A85), and Matsui and Kaya (26A95) have reviewed the findings on the detection of NNAs in cosmetics. Spiegelhalder and Preussmann (26A169) described the volatile and nonvolatile NNAs found in many
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1229
11/24/08 12:39:20 PM
1230
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
samples of toiletries and cosmetics. Eisenbrand et al. (26B15) reported a series of N-nitrosodialkylamines in cosmetics. Investigations [Spiegelhalder and Eisenbrand (26A164), Spiegelhalder (26A163)] of various rubber products that come in frequent contact with human tissue revealed the presence of several NNAs. Baby-bottle nipples and pacifiers contained appreciable levels of NDMA, NDEA, N-nitrosodibutylamine (NDBA) [Thompson et al. (26A174)], and NPIP. NDMA and NDEA were found in various rubber toys. These two NNAs plus NPIP were also found in rubber gloves. In their study of NNAs in rubber products, Sen et al. (26A149), in their analysis of thirty samples, reported the detection of NMOR in various rubber products in addition to NDMA, NDEA, NDBA, and NPIP. Solenova et al. (26A161) reported the presence of NDMA and NDEA. Several NNAs have been identified in pesticides used on various vegetable crops, for example, NDMA [Ross et al. (26A137)] and N-nitrosodipropylamine (NDPA) [Zweig et al. (26A198)]. Most water supplies show little evidence of volatile or nonvolatile NNAs. However, water deionized by passage through various anion-exchange resins containing trialkylammonium compounds were reported to show NDMA levels ranging from 0.03 to 0.34 mg/liter [Fiddler et al. (26A35), Fine et al. (26A37, 26A38), Gough et al. (26A44), Cohen and Bachman (26A14), Kimoto et al. (26A72), Mitch et al. (26A112a)]. On the subject of industrial and occupational exposures to NNAs, Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) wrote: Data on occupational exposure to different nitrosamines are recent and not yet representative or complete. Nevertheless, the data indicate that certain industries have a serious
nitrosamine problem and that the highest known concentrations of preformed N-nitrosamines occur in the workplace, especially in the rubber and leather industries … Exposures have been shown to vary considerably in regard to amount and type of nitrosamine found in different working places in several industries and occupations.
Preussmann and Eisenbrand (2990) summarized the following situations: In the rubber industry, workers were exposed to NDMA, NDEA, NMOR, and NPIP. In their study of the atmospheres in 132 sites in twelve rubberprocessing plants in France, Ducos and Gaudin (26A24) reported the detection of NDMA, NDEA, and NMOR in 93%, 27%, and 13% of the sites surveyed, respectively. In the leather-tanning industry, exposures to NDMA [Bailey et al. (26A04), Skrabs (26A159), Wolf et al. (26A194)] and to NDEA [Skrabs (26A159), Wolf (26A193)], and NMOR [Wolf (26A193)] occur. Exposures to NDELA [Erickson et al. (1159)] in the cutting oils used in machine shops and to NDMA and NDEA [Wolf et al. (26A194), Wolf (26A193)] in foundries have been reported. In a plant producing rocket fuels, including 1,1-dimethylhydrazine by reduction of NDMA, workers were exposed to extremely high levels of NDMA. Shortly after this high exposure was recorded, the factory ceased manufacture of 1,1-dimethylhydrazine. Exposures to NDMA and NDEA have been reported in chemical and pharmaceutical factories where amines are used in production. In Table XXVI-19 is presented a simplified summary of the possible exposures to non-tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines that are known components of tobacco smoke. All ten NNAs
Table XXVI-19 Non-Tobacco Exposures to Tobacco/Tobacco Smoke N-Nitrosamines N-Nitrosaminea Consumer Good or Environment Tobacco and/or tobacco smokeb Food, beverages Rubber goods Cosmetics Pharmaceuticalsc Pesticidesc Water Industrial environments Rubber processing plants Leather tanneries Foundries Machine shops
NDMA
NDEA
NDPA
NDBA
NDELA
NPIP
NPYR
NPRO
NMOR
NSAR
× × × —
× × × — — — — — × × × —
× × — — —
× × × — — — — — — — — —
× ×
× × × — — — — — × — — —
× × — — — — — — — — — —
× × — — — — — — — — — —
× × × — — — — — — — — —
× × — — — — — — × × — —
× × × — × × × —
× — — — — — —
× — — — — — — — ×
NDMA = N-nitrosodimethylamine; NDEA = N-nitrosodiethylamine; NDPA = N-nitrosodipropylamine; NDBA = N-nitrosodibutylamine; NDELA = N-nitrosodiethanolamine; NPIP = N-nitrosopiperidine; NPYR = N-nitrosopyrrolidine; NPRO = N-nitrosoproline; NMOR = N-nitrosomorpholine; NSAR = N-nitrososarcosine b In addition to the NNAs listed, tobacco and tobacco smoke contain a variety of TSNAs and N-nitrosamino acids other than N-nitrososarcosine. c N-Nitrosamines other than those determined in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke have also been detected in various consumer goods
a
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1230
11/24/08 12:39:20 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
listed are found not only in tobacco smoke but also in a great variety of commonly consumed foodstuffs and beverages. XXVI.B.1.d Alternate Exposures to N-Heterocyclic Amines Because of their concerns about the mutagenicity of commonly consumed heated foods, many of the studies of the isolation, identification, and estimation of N-heterocyclic amines in heated foodstuffs or heated food components, particularly amine-containing components such as amino acids, proteins, and peptides, were conducted by Japanese investigators. This becomes obvious from examination of the authors and co-authors of the references listed in Table XXVI-20. With the advent of the Ames mutagenicity test with Salmonella typhimurium in the mid-1970s and the demonstration of its utility, the number of studies on potential mutagenic systems and the mutagenicity-tumorigenicity relationship virtually exploded. By highly competent application of up-to-date isolation and characterization techniques plus utilization of the Ames test, Sugimura and his staff at the Japanese National Cancer Research Institute contributed significantly to our knowledge of the structures, properties, and precursors in foods of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines. Although the methodologies differed, the 1977 isolation and identification of the mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines (Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2) from a tryptophan pyrolysate paralleled the historic 1932 isolation and identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (B[a]P, B[e]P, B[a]A, perylene) from coal tar. In the 1930s, the Kennaway group in the United Kingdom used ultraviolet spectrophotometry [Hieger (1631)] to monitor coal-tar PAHs during their concentration and purification by repeated precipitations and recrystallizations of PAH-picric acid complexes [Cook et al. (796a, 797)]. In the mid-1970s, Sugimura et al. (3829) used the Ames test (Salmonella typhimurium, TA 98 strain/S-9) to monitor tryptophan pyrolysate mutagens (TrpP-1, Trp-P-2) during their concentration and purification by sequential chromatography on silicic acid, alumina, and CM-Sephadex® columns. References to several early studies on the identification of biologically active compounds in heated foodstuffs are included in Table XXVI-20, for example, the 1956 study of PAHs such as B[a]P in roasted coffee [Kuratsune, (2237)] and the similar mid-1960s studies of PAHs in broiled meat [Lijinsky and Shubik (2364a, 2364b)]. PAHs such as B[a] P were identified in both studies. The major concern of the early investigators was the possible presence of tumorigenic PAHs, particularly B[a]P, in the heated foodstuff. Another PAH of concern was the potent tumorigen 3-methylcholanthrene because of its possible pyrosynthesis during cooking from cholesterol, a component of many meats. Of course, it was subsequently demonstrated that B[a]P, in addition to its tumorigenicity to mouse skin, is also mutagenic in the Ames test. However, its specific mutagenicity is insignificant compared to that of many N-heterocyclic amines.
1231
From their studies of heated foods or food pyrolysates (thirty different foods, including rice, flour, soy beans, fish, meat, and eggs), Sugimura and Nagao (3828b) reported: • Mutagenicity was proportional to the protein content. • Mutagenicity was proportional to the levels of specific amino acids (tryptophan, glutamic acid, etc.) in the constituent protein. • Mutagenicity was dependent on water content and heating temperature, for example, for foods with low water content, the mutagens appear at 300°C; for those with high water content, the mutagens appear at 400°C. As noted in the sections on PAHs and NNAs in foods, estimates of daily exposures to these classes of compounds in foods, beverages, and other factors have been made by numerous investigators. Estimates of exposures to mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines are limited. Part of the reason is the difference in time span since the particular class of compounds was found to be tumorigenic and/or mutagenic. Exposures to PAHs tumorigenic in laboratory animal bioassays have been studied for more than seven decades [since the early 1930s and the identification of B[a]P in coal tar by Cook et al. (796a, 797)]. Exposures to NNAs tumorigenic in laboratory animal bioassays have been studied [Magee and Barnes (2441a)] since the mid-1950s. In contrast, exposures to mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines reported to be tumorigenic in laboratory animal bioassays have only been studied for about thirty years (since the mid-1970s and the availability of the Ames test). In his mid-1980s review, Sugimura (3828c) attempted to estimate the exposure of humans to mutagenic N-heterocyclic amines with the limited data at his disposal. He wrote: Taking various factors into consideration, it is probably impractical and not realistic to make risk estimations from the carcinogenicity data on rodents given a single carcinogen. However, for a simple extrapolation of animal data for risk estimation, TD50 values, which are the doses needed to develop cancers in 50% of animals fed on carcinogens [IQ, Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, Glu-P-1, Glu-P-2, AaC, and MeAaC] for their life time, have been calculated based on mouse experiments … If we assume the average TD50 value of heterocyclic amines should be about 8mg/kg/day, we can roughly estimate the risk of these carcinogenic heterocyclic amines for human beings. The intake of heterocyclic amines was calculated from available data on their quantities in foods. Apparently the human intake is about 0.0002% times the TD50 obtained from animal data. This means that heterocyclic amines may not be so serious for human cancer development.
Sugimura added: On the other hand, it is also true that human beings are being exposed to many heterocyclic amines and many other carcinogens with tumor promoters and/or suppressing factors for carcinogenesis. At this moment, it is honest to state that no solid information on the estimation of risk of heterocyclic amines has been obtained in any direction, either positive or negative.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1231
11/24/08 12:39:20 PM
1232
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVI-20 Mutagenicity of Beverages, Heated Foods, and Heated Food Components Food or Food Component Foods, heated (grilled, broiled, etc.)
References
Herring, broiled Mackerel, broiled Pike, broiled Sardine, broiled
Sugimura et al. (3829a), Sugimura and Nagao (3829b), Matsumoto et al. (2492), Sugimura (3828a, 3828c, 3828f), Nagao et al (2667a), Tanaka et al. (2667a), Felton and Knize (1177d) Commoner et al (790a), Hargraves and Pariza (1501a), Hayatsu et al. (1555b), Turesky et al. (3988b), Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Takayama et al. (3862c) Lijinsky and Shubika (2364a, 2364b), Nagao et al. (2667c), Commoner et al. (790a), Yasuda et al. (4382a), Hayatsu et al. (1555a, 1555b), Kasai et al. (2037a), Jägerstad et al. (1916b), Felton et al. (1177d), Ohgaki et al. (2849a), Takayama et al. (3862c) Yamaguchi et al. (4361a), Ohgaki et al. (2849a) Sugimura and Nagao (3829b) Nagao et al. (2667c), Yasuda et al. (4382a), Kasai et al. (2037c, 2037d), Yamaizumi et al. (4361b) Nagao et al. (2667c, 2667f)
Sardine, broiled
Ohgaki et al. (2949a), Takayama et al. (3862c)
Protein pyrolysates Albumin Soybean globulin Calf thymus Egg white Serum albumin Casein; collagen; Gluten; histone; Insulin; lysozyme; Ovalbumin; zein; Tobacco protein
Nagao et al. (2667f), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4387b), Nebert et al. (2688a), Yoshida et al. (4390) Yasuda et al. (4382a) Yoshida et al. (4389a, Ohgaki et al. (2849b) Nagao et al. (2667b) Matsumoto et al. (2491c)
Peptide pyrolysates Polypeptides Carnosine Glycyl glycineb Glycyl glutamic acid Glycyl proline Glycyl tryptophan Leucyl glycyl phenylalanine Tryptophanyl alanine Tryptophanyl glycine Tryptophanyl tryptophan Tryptophanyl tyrosine
Johnson et al. (1968) Matsumoto et al. (2491c)
Amino acid pyrolysates
Masuda et al. (2486), Kato et al. (2048, 2049), Kosuge et al. (2178a), Nebert et al. (2688a)
Phenylalanine Lysine Tryptophan
Sugimura et al. (3829) Wakabayashi et al. (4102a) Sugimura et al. (3829), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4387a), Negishi and Hayatsu (2689a), Yamazoe et al. (4379a), Hosaka et al. (1835a), Matsukura et al. (2491a), Takayama et al. (3862d) Sugimura (3828a, 4365a), Takeda et al. (3863a), Yamamoto et al. (4365a), Ohgaki et al. (2849b), Takayama et al. (3862b) Smith et al. (3722a)
Beef, extract Beef, broiled, fried, and/or charred
Cuttlefish, broiled Eggs; fish; meat Flour; rice Soy beans Fish, broiled, charred
Glutamic acid Histidine 3-Methylhistidine
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1232
11/24/08 12:39:20 PM
Carcinogens, Tumorigens, and Mutagens vs. Anticarcinogens, Inhibitors, and Antimutagens
1233
Table XXVI-20 (continued) Mutagenicity of Beverages, Heated Foods, and Heated Food Components Food or Food Component
References
Alaninec; arginine; Asparagine; citrulline; Cysteine; cystine; Glutamic acid; Glutamine; histidine; Lysine; methionine; Ornithine; Phenylalanine; serine; Threonine; tryptophan; Tyrosine; valine
Matsumoto et al. (2491b)
Beverages Coffee, roasted Coffee, instant Tea Brandy Sake Cigarette smoke condensate
Kuratsune b (2237), Nagao et al. (2667d, 2667e), Sugimura (3828b), Aeschbacher and Würzner (38a) Aeschbacher and Würzner (38a), Kosugi et al. (2178b) Nagao et al. (2667e), Sugimura (3828d) Sugimura (3828d) Takase and Murakami (3862a) Sugimura (3828d), Yoshida and Matsumoto (4388), Matsumoto et al. (2492), DeMarini (930, 9329, 933)
This was a PAH study, with emphasis on the generation of B[a]P. No mutagens detected in glycylglycine pyrolysate. c The pyrolysates from the various amino acids studied showed mutagenicities (Ames test) in the following sequence (revertant/mg of pyrolysate), the amino acid yielding the highest mutagenic pyrolysate listed first: Tryptophan, serine, glutamic acid, ornithine, lysine, arginine, citrulline, threonine, alanine, cystine, glutamine, methionine, cysteine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, histidine, asparagine, valine. a
b
Table XXVI-21 Mutagenicity of Common Beverages vs. Cigarette Smoke Condensate Agent Cigarette Coffee Teab Brandy
Exposure Level
ST Straina
S-9 mix
Revertants
one, inhaled 200 ml 200 ml 50 ml
TA 98 TA 100 TA 100 TA 100
yes no no no
4000 180000 mutagenic 10500
ST = Salmonella typhimurium b Japanese green tea a
Table XXVI-22 Benzo[a]Pyrene Equivalency of Extracts of Charred Fish and Meat Analyte Sardine Mackerel Beefsteak a b
Sample wt., g
B[a]P Equivalency, ng
Cigarette Equivalency Based on B[a]Pa
100 (3.5)b 60 (2.1) 190 (6.7)
35800 68200 85500
2983 5683 7125
Calculation based on assumption of MSS yield of 12 ng/cig of B[a]P Number in parentheses is weight in ounces
Sugimura (3828d) reported comparisons of the mutagenicities (Ames test) of various beverages (coffee, brandy, and tea) and CSC. His data are summarized in Table XXVI-21. In another comparison of mutagenicities toward Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, Nagao et al. (2667c) calculated the B[a]P equivalency of extracts of charred fish and meat. Their data, with additions (charred food weight in ounces, cigarette equivalents based on B[a]P), are shown in Table XXVI-22.
XXVI.C Summary It is obvious from the numerous Hoffmann co-authored lists (1727, 1740, 1741, 1743, 1744, 1773, 1808) summarized in Table XXVI-1 plus many other listings (1217, 2825) and articles that some seventy tobacco smoke components are defined as significant toxicants, with most of the seventy being defined as significant tumorigens. Forty or so have recently been defined as “Hoffmann analytes” and their cigarette MSS yield reductions are used to define a “potentially reduced exposure product” (PREP). It should be noted that the various bioassays that generated the data used to define the tumorigenicity of the various cigarette smoke components are similar to or identical with the various bioassays that generated the data to define the antitumorigenicity of various compounds to several known potent tumorigens such as B[a]P or DB[a,h]A. Many of the compounds with demonstrated antitumorigenicity have been identified in CSC and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1233
11/24/08 12:39:21 PM
1234
are present in it at much higher levels than such potent tumorigens as B[a]P, DB[a,h]A, and DMB[a]A. Why do so many of the proponents of the hazards of cigarette MSS seldom discuss in detail the many anticarcinogens, antitumorigens, or antimutagens present in MSS or the many alternate exposures to the various compound classes, the PAHs, aza-arenes, NNAs, and N-heterocyclic amines, defined as significant cigarette MSS problems? At the 1962 American Association for Cancer Research conference (4314), in their 1964 review [see pp. 330–331 in (4319)], and in their 1967 book, Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 370–371 in (4332)] also described the results of their experiments on the antitumorigenicity of two tobacco smoke paraffinic hydrocarbons, n-hentriacontane (C31H64) and n-pentatriacontane (C35H72), co-administered separately at two different levels with B[a]P. Subsequently, they noted [see pp. 628–629 in (4332)]: An explanation of the tumorigenic activity of tobacco smoke condensate in terms of single constituents is made more difficult by the presence of substances that may act as anticarcinogens and/or absorption retarders, especially for tumorigenic agents. It is known that noncarcinogenic hydrocarbons can inhibit the effect of carcinogenica hydrocarbons … The presence of substances such as long-chain paraffinic hydrocarbons may interfere with absorption of tumorigenica components. It is interesting to note the authors’ interchange of these two terms.
a
In their book, Wynder and Hoffmann described not only the 1951 results reported by Steiner and Falk (3814) on the antitumorigenicity of B[a]A to B[a]P when co-administered subcutaneously but also their own 1963 results of the antitumorigenicity of B[a]A to B[a]P when administered in a skinpainting bioassay [see pp. 246–247 in (4332)]. They noted: The existence of anticarcinogens, however, must be considered in evaluating any complex mixture such as tobacco smoke condensate.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Despite such a statement, neither Wynder and Hoffmann nor any of the proponents of the hazards of cigarette smoking discussed in any detail the presence of antitumorigens in cigarette MSS. The same proponents usually disregard alternate exposures to various tumorigens despite the many pre-mid-1950s articles by Kennaway and Hueper on respiratory effect of air pollutants. Because of the chronology of the discovery of the tumorigenicity of NNAs in the mid-1950s and N-heterocyclic amines in the late 1970s, it is obvious that neither Kennaway nor Hueper could discuss alternate exposures to them. Examples of more recent research are the many publications by Grimmer et al. on exposure to PAHs (1397–1402, 1405, 1406a, 1406b, 1407b) and aza-arenes (1407a) as air pollutants. In the monograph edited by Searle, comprising over 1400 pages on chemical carcinogens (3568), only one of the major classes (PAHs, aza-arenes, N-heterocyclic amines) of tumorigenic components in MSS was mentioned. The exception, the presence of NNAs in tobacco and smoke, was described briefly by Preussmann and Eisenbrand [see pp. 839–842 in (2990)]. The bulk of the material they cited on NNAs in tobacco and/or smoke included tabulated results by Hoffmann and his colleagues on NNAs and TSNAs in tobacco smoke (514, 1680) and tobacco [including snuff (1675, 1677, 1685)]. However, Preussmann and Eisenbrand cited many pre-1984 publications in which much data were presented on exposure to NNAs from many alternate sources such as food [see pp. 832–834 in (2990)], beverages [see pp. 834–839 in (2990)], cosmetics [see pp. 842–844 in (2990)], prescriptions [see pp. 844–845 in (2990)], pesticides [see pp. 845–846 in (2990)], rubber products [see pp. 846–848 in (2990)], water [see pp. 848–849 in (2990)], and occupations [see pp. 851–857 in (2990)]. In his chapter in Searle (3568), Grasso (1345) described the results of much research on PAHs and NNAs in foods but none on N-heterocyclic amines in food. Many references to alternate exposures to NNAs are presented herein but a great many more may be obtained by a search of the Internet.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C026.indd 1234
11/24/08 12:39:21 PM
27
Free Radicals
XXVII.A Introduction Free radicals and reactive oxygen species are common to all living animals and plants, including tobacco. Reactive oxygen species in plants include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and singlet oxygen (1O2), as well as several free radicals and radical anions, such as nitric oxide (NO), superoxide anion radical (O2ˉ˙), hydroxyl radical (HO˙), and perhydroxyl radical (HO2˙), [Bartosz (27A06), Dat et al. (27A23), Halliwell (27A40)]. These highly reactive oxidation by-products are created by normal cell metabolism and environmental factors such as pollution and are continuously produced by living organism. Free radicals play an important role in the life processes of plants. Free radicals and reactive oxygen species are produced predominantly in plant cells during photosynthesis and photorespiration, and to a lesser extent, in respiration processes. Free radicals and reactive oxygen species play crucial roles as signaling molecules in various physiological processes. For example, during periods of environmental stress intra- and intercellular levels of H2O2 and NO tend to increase. Additionally, specific types of free radicals and reactive oxygen species interact with thiol-containing proteins and activate different signaling pathways as well as transcription factors, which in turn regulate gene expression and cell-cycle processes. Therefore, free radicals and reactive oxygen species control numerous types of cellular redox reactions (homeostasis), signaling processes (photosynthetic and respiratory metabolism), and processes that regulate plant growth, development, acclimatory and defense ´ lesak et al. (27A105)]. responses [S The role of free radicals and reactive oxygen species in plant biochemistry and physiology have been described in many review papers [Kuz ´niak and Urbanek (27A63), Neill et al. (27A80, 27A81), Apel and Hirt (27A02), Hung et al. (27A47)]. There are no free radicals or reactive oxygen species that are unique to tobacco. As a result there will not be an in-depth discussion of free radicals or reactive oxygen species specifically found in tobacco. In most cases the free radicals in biological systems are highly reactive and have half-lives of 10 -6 to 10 -3 seconds. Nonetheless, free radical activity has been observed in tobacco. Analytical methodologies rapid and specific enough to monitor and identify these free radicals are just emerging. It is believed that the presence of oxygen (O2) in the Earth’s atmosphere originated from photosynthetic activity. However, oxygen is involved in two very different roles in biological systems. It is a prerequisite for aerobic metabolism and consequent normal growth and development, but at the same time a reduction or an increase of molecular oxygen in biological systems very often results in the formation of reactive oxygen species that can cause deregulation of normal
cellular processes and eventually cause cell death. Therefore, in plants and in other aerobic organisms antioxidant systems have evolved. The balance of oxidants and antioxidants in plants and animals is critical for survival. The production of reactive oxygen species is normally carefully controlled by living organisms. A dynamic equilibrium exists between the formation of reactive oxygen species and the activity of the antioxidant scavenging systems [Hancock et al. (27A45), Irshad and Chaudhuri (27A49), Mittler et al. (27A74), Mittler (27A73), Vranova et al. (27A119)]. To protect themselves from reactive oxygen species, plants possess a number of free-radical scavenging enzymes, such as ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase, and low molecular weight antioxidants, like ascorbate and tocopherols [Hancock et al. (27A45), Vranova et al. (27A119)]. Antioxidants in tobacco and tobacco smoke are discussed in Chapter 26. At the senescence stage in tobacco growth, enzyme activities (especially hydrolytic and other degradative enzyme systems) are intensified. These systems are responsible for breakdown of functional and structural components of the cell, such as proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipids. The latter stage of senescence resembles the early stage of leaf curing [Tso (27A114)]. During each of these processes, free radical reactions are occurring in tobacco leaf. In 1955, Frankenburg et al. reported that free radical reactions were occurring in cured tobacco leaves to form a nicotine dimer (1224, 1226). After tobacco is grown, cured, and aged there are free radicals still found in the lamina. It is believed that free radicals are present on the polyphenols, carbohydrates, and lignin present in tobacco. This is supported by evidence for the generation of free radicals in cellulose by irradiation with ultraviolet light [Kleinert (27A61)]. The existence of stable free radicals in lignin has also been demonstrated [Rex (27A98), Steelink (27A107), Steelink et al. (27A108)]. The formation of free radicals in wood by ionizing radiation has been shown, as well as the generation of free radicals in wood resulting from exposure to light [Kalnins et al. (27A57)]. Free radicals are ubiquitous. They are found in living plants and for practical purposes are essential to all life. They also exist in plant material that is dried. These types of free radicals are called persistent free radicals and are normally associated with free radicals present in the structural biomass of the plant (polyphenols, carbohydrates, and lignin). The tobacco precursors of free radicals found in the particulate phase of cigarette mainstream smoke (MSS) are also long-lived, persistent free radicals but arise from the thermolysis of the tobacco biomass to form numerous types of phenolic and quinoidal free radicals [Wooten et al. (27A120)]. Short-lived free radicals are also present in the vapor phase 1235
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1235
11/24/08 2:38:14 PM
1236
of MSS. Although the types of free radical in tobacco may be similar in form to those in tobacco smoke, in some cases, for example, NO, they are generated in very different ways. Free radicals can participate in a wide variety of reactions, such as additions, substitutions, eliminations, rearrangements, reductions, electron transfers, and oxidations (27A01). From the beginning of the twentieth century, free radical chemistry has spread its influence over a wide range of research areas that impact our progress and well-being. Apart from polymer chemistry, synthetic organic chemistry, and environmental chemistry, much effort in recent times is expended on research in health and nutrition [Nagendrappa (27A78)]. There are some general features of a free radical reaction. Free radical reactions take three distinct, identifiable steps. The first is formation of the free radical that can happen by enzyme catalysis, homolysis, thermolysis, radiation, light induction, combustion and pyrolysis, or other means. The second step, called propagation, is the heart of a free radical reaction. In this step, free radicals are repeatedly regenerated and can react with neutral molecules to produce new free radicals. If there is no intervention, two free radicals can react to form a neutral molecule and the reaction is terminated, which represents the third step in the general reaction scheme. Because of this repetitive nature of the reaction, free radical reactions are called “chain reactions” and are often represented as a cyclic process [Nagendrappa (27A78)].
XXVII.B Analytical Methods for Determination of Free Radicals The instrumental method historically used for the detection of free radicals is electron spin resonance (ESR) (sometimes called electron paramagnetic resonance, ERP). ESR is a spectroscopic technique that detects species that have unpaired electrons. Free radicals can be organic compounds that have a free electron on carbon, oxygen, or nitrogen, or inorganic compounds or complexes that have a free electron, usually residing on a metal (27A31). ESR spectroscopy is the preferred and major analytical technique for the detection and quantification of free radicals [Demopoulos (27A28)]. ESR has been used in many fields of science to explore the presence and effects of free radicals in chemistry, physics, and biology. Free radicals can be gases, liquids, or solids and generally exist in very low, and in some cases, steady-state concentrations. ESR can be used to make direct measurements of free radicals that exist in steady-state concentrations [Demopoulos et al. (27A29)]. For short-lived, highly reactive free radicals, regardless of their physical and chemical form, numerous methodologies are now available to convert these free radicals into longer-lived species for analysis. Short-lived free radicals are first treated with another reagent called a spin trap. The resultant product, the spin adduct, is a more stable free radical species that can then be measured by ESR. Concentrations of free radicals are determined by measuring the spin-trap adducts. A wide variety of spin-trapping reagents have been used. Figure XXVII-1 shows the chemical structures for a
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
selection of these spin traps. Techniques that use ESR alone or ESR with spin-trapping methodologies have advanced tremendously over the last forty years [Janzen and Gerlock (27A54), Janzen (27A52, 27A53), Janzen et al. (27A55)]. Unlike other typical analytical techniques, such as infrared spectroscopy, ESR measurements require a high level of technical skill and expertise. ESR sample measurements are highly dependent on sample collection, sample preparation, types of solvents, temperature, choice of spin trap, and instrument calibration of electrical and magnetic fields, among other things. ESR, by itself, is considered a very specific, yet semiquantifiable, technique for the measurement of free radicals. It can be used in conjunction with other analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography, mass spectroscopy, and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the study of free radicals [Cranton and Frackelton (27A20)]. ESR used in conjunction with other analytical techniques is an emerging field. Free radicals can also be measured in biological samples. In a recent review by Sanchez-Moreno (27A103), several ESR techniques were described for the collection and determination of free radicals (superoxide, hydroxyl, and peroxyl) that occur in biological systems. These techniques include the total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter method (TRAP), the oxygen-radical absorbance capacity method (ORAC), and the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity method (TEAC). McAnalley et al. (27A70) have provided descriptions and applications of these (and other) methodologies for the determination of free radicals in biological media. SanchezMoreno (27A103) concludes that “in spite of the diversity of biological methods, there is a great need to standardize measurements of antioxidant activity.” Sophisticated ESR instrumentation is now becoming available that allows for the direct study of free radicals and free radical damage in living systems. In 2006, Hirata and Fujii (27A46) reviewed newly developed technologies in ESR spectroscopy and imaging equipment that are useful for the analysis of free radicals in living (biological) systems. Automatic control techniques used for a continuous-wave ESR spectrometer were discussed. Recent developments in timedomain ESR spectroscopy were also reported. Time-domain ESR spectroscopy is a technically challenging method, but can be very useful for the detection of free radicals with very short relaxation times in biological tissues. ESR imaging techniques were also reviewed which are able to visualize free radicals in animal subjects noninvasively. Applications of in vivo ESR spectroscopy and imaging for the detection of free radicals generated in biological specimens is another emerging field especially designed for the noninvasive direct detection of free radicals in biomedical applications. Shulaev and Oliver (27A104) and Tarpey et al. (27A113) have also recently written reviews on ESR methods for the detection of reactive oxygen- and nitrogen-centered free radical metabolites in in vitro and in vivo systems employing metabolic and proteomic markers for oxidative stress. Additional articles, reviews, and books on ESR and methodologies to detect and measure reactive free radicals in vitro
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1236
11/24/08 2:38:15 PM
1237
Free Radicals
O
O
CH3 CH3
HC=N
HC=N
CH3 CH3
CH3
CH3 O=N
CH3
PBN
4-PBNO
N
CH3
MPN
CH3
O CH3 CH3 N N O
PNO
N O
4-methyl-PNO
O
CH3 DMPO
Figure XXVII-1 Chemical structures of 4-POBN, PBN, MNP, PNO, 4-methyl-PNO, and DMPO spin traps. (From McCormick, M.L., G.R. Buettner, and B.E. Britigan; J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995) 29265-29269. With permission.)
and in vivo in plants and animals have been written by Khan and Swartz (27A58), Khan et al. (27A59), Bacic and Mojovic (27A03), Muckenschnabel et al. (27A75), Halliwell and Whiteman (27A43), Utsumi and Yamada (27A116), Utsumi et al. (27A117), and Halliwell and Poulsen (27A42). The newest methodologies for the detection, quantification, and identification of free radicals in cigarette smoke employ HPLC and high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of stable radical adducts [Bartalis et al. (27A05)], hyphenated LC-MS/MS techniques with a C18 reverse phase column fitted to a triple quadrupole instrument for analysis of stable radical adducts [Rolando et al. (27A99, 27A100)], and electrospray ionization (ESI)-HPLC/MS analysis of stable radical adducts [Masselot et al. (27A68, 27A69)].
XXVII.C Free Radicals in Tobacco Smoke Tobacco smoke contains free radicals. As presented in previous chapters, tobacco smoke is a highly complex aerosol composed of more than 5000 components distributed between the vapor and the particulate phases. The enormous complexity of cigarette smoke is the result of multiple thermolytic processes that occur in heated tobacco within the confines of the burning cigarette rod. These processes involve distillation, pyrolysis, and combustion and are influenced by several factors, including the design of the cigarette [Norman (27A82)] and the composition of the tobacco blend [Bokelman and Ryan (385), Leffingwell (2338)]. As indicated in Chapters 1 through 21, numerous classes of organic compounds are represented in cigarette smoke, including saturated, unsaturated, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, phenols, nitriles, N-nitrosamines, terpenoids, and alkaloids [see also Baker (172), Dube and Green (1067), Hoffmann et al. (1744)]. Invariably, the combustion of tobacco, like
that of any organic matter, also produces free radicals via oxidative processes involving homolytic reactions. The high temperatures produced during the smoking process are easily capable of causing bond scissions that lead to free radical production [Badger et al. (141), Brown (27A14)]. An elaborate description of the fluctuating thermal gradients and vapor environment inside a cigarette during smoking has been given by Baker (172). The chemical complexity of cigarette smoke is strongly dependent on the heating conditions inside the lit cigarette. To summarize briefly, when a smoker lights and draws on a cigarette, the temperature of the ignited tobacco rises rapidly, and a hot coal forms at the lit end of the cigarette (the combustion zone and pyrolysis zone). Peak temperatures inside the coal can exceed 900°C. The high temperature inside the coal during a puff causes an increase in the viscosity of the air flowing through the coal and a concomitant increase in the resistance to the draw of air through the cigarette. This effect forces air to be drawn primarily into the periphery of the coal at the paper burn line rather than through the center of the coal. The depletion of oxygen due to combustion inside the coal and the flux of air around the coal results in the formation of a region immediately behind the coal that is depleted of oxygen, but where the temperatures remain high enough to promote the thermal decomposition of the unburned tobacco. This area behind the coal is known as the pyrolysis/distillation zone. Large amounts of volatile and semivolatile smoke constituents evolve from this zone. These constituents result, in part, from the pyrolysis of tobacco, and in part, from the distillation of volatile constituents native to tobacco because of the heat of the encroaching coal. Numerous types of MSS free radicals are formed in this pyrolysis/distillation zone [Wooten et al. (27A120)]. Cigarette smoke can be divided into two phases, particulate- and vapor-phase smoke, by the use of a Cambridge filter
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1237
11/24/08 2:38:16 PM
1238
[Dube and Green (1067)]. The radicals in these two fractions differ greatly. The MSS particulate phase contains more than 1017 stable, long-lived radicals per gram of total particulate matter (TPM). The vapor phase of smoke contains more than 1015 short-lived radicals per puff [Baker (27A04), Wooten et al. (27A120)]. Free radicals in tobacco smoke were initially detected in whole smoke by Lyons et al. (2429). After some years, scientists became interested in examining the population of free radicals in the particulate and vapor phases of MSS. This trend has continued for nearly forty-five years. It was not until recently that it was proposed that artifacts may be forming during the separation of the whole smoke [Culcasi et al. (27A22), Bartalis et al. (27A05)].
XXVII.D Historical Review of Free Radical Research on Cigarette Smoke The following paragraphs chronologically summarize research reported on free radicals in MSS [Prier (27A84)] and important discoveries that shaped the mechanisms proposed to explain the generation of free radicals in MSS and their possible biological impact. This historical review of free radicals in cigarette smoke is not exhaustive, but attempts to capture much of the fundamental research that has shaped this field of science and gives the researcher ready sources for further examination. In 1958, Lyons et al. (2429) first observed free radicals by electron spin resonance (ESR) in whole cigarette smoke that was condensed at liquid oxygen temperature. These workers reported that whole cigarette smoke contains two populations of free radicals, an unstable population that can only be observed at -183°C and that vanishes when the condensate is warmed to 60°C, and a persistent, stable population that exists for “several days” at room temperature. They reported that the unstable population accounts for about one-sixth of the total free radical population determined at -183°C and consists of about 1015 free electrons per gram of tar. This work was repeated by Forbes et al. (1211) in 1967 with very similar results. In a second set of experiments Lyons and Spence in 1958 studied the effect of extracting benzene solutions of the stable free radicals with water, 2 N sodium hydroxide, and 2 N sulfuric acid. They reported that the ESR signal of the stable free radicals was reduced in intensity following each extraction by 20, 50, and 57%, respectively. They concluded that whole cigarette smoke contains several different types of free radicals, some of which are very stable while others exist only fleetingly. They also suggested for the first time that free radicals might be involved in the carcinogenicity of cigarette smoke (2432). In a follow-up study, Lyons and Spence in 1960 reported the detection of free radicals in sidestream smoke (SSS) as well as in MSS. They reported that dried SSS condensate contains 5 × 1014 spins per gram of tar, while MSS condensate contains 6 × 1015 spins per gram of tar. These results were compared
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
to chimney soot and to the condensed exhaust material from Diesel-powered automobiles that contain 5 × 1018 and 2 × 1019 spins per gram of material, respectively (2435). Ingram and Allen in 1959 (1862) and Ingram in 1961 (1861) published two further extensions of earlier work in which the pyrolysis of organic material was related to the production of free radicals detected by ESR. They demonstrated that free radical production by pyrolysis is a general phenomenon that occurs with various types of hydrocarbons and that the concentration of free radicals produced is proportional to the percent of carbon in the pyrolyzed material. A maximum free radical concentration was detected at about 90% carbon. They concluded that such a high percentage of carbon is consistent with a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and that free electrons must reside within such a structure. Ingram (1861) postulated that the stable free radicals generated from the pyrolysis of tobacco could be benzosemiquinone radicals. He also postulated that PAH free radicals would be present in tobacco smoke condensate. In 1963, Marsden and Collins (2466) reported on their results from measurements of α-activity in leaf tobacco used for cigarettes marketed in the United Kingdom, and in specially made, standard-size unblended cigarettes made from tobaccos originating from widely separated geographical locations. The origin of free radicals in tobacco smoke was discussed. They speculated on contributions of α-radiation and free radicals in cigarette smoke in the induction of lung cancer. In that same year, Westermark (4220a) suggested that free radicals generated during smoking could lead to a free radical chain reaction, which could possibly generate enough free radicals to be carcinogenic. Wynder and Hoffmann in their lengthy 1964 review of tobacco carcinogenesis (4319) discussed tobacco smoke as a “complete carcinogen” and in their evaluation of the role of tobacco smoke components in experimental carcinogenesis listed radicals with the comment that radicals are “suggested as possible carcinogens in disagreement with the experiments” [see p. 391, Table XXII in (4319)]. Takeshita and Ohe in 1964 published a paper on the effects of aging of cigarette smoke and its relation to radical concentration (3864). In their study they used the radical scavenger α,α’-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and were able to detect free radicals in condensed whole smoke from flue-cured tobacco after 300 hr, employing a colorimetric method. DPPH is a fluorescent stable free radical and will react with other radicals to form a neutral, nonfluorescent hydrazine species. DPPH is not considered a spin trap, which generally involves free radical addition to a nitroso function. The reaction produces stable nitroxides which build up to readily detectable concentrations in the presence of a free radical source. The usefulness of radical addition reactions with nitrones has been found to exceed that of the nitroso compound because of their greater stability in a variety of reaction conditions. Much work has been done with phenyl N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) in solution, although many new spin adducts are now available. The free radical addition reaction is called a spin-trapping reaction. The nitrone or nitroso
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1238
11/24/08 2:38:17 PM
Free Radicals
compound is called a spin trap and the radical addition product is called a spin adduct [Janzen and Gerlock (27A54)]. In 1965, Boenig (369) reported on the pyrolytic products of cigarettes irradiated with 60Co γ-radiation. ESR experiments were not conducted on the tobacco to determine the presence or extent of free radicals, although a reduction in concentration of free radicals in smoke condensate (as measured by ESR) was noted along with reductions in MSS tars and tar-like components. Later in 1975, Severson et al. (3610) conducted studies on γ irradiation of cigarettes and concluded that γ irradiation had no major effects on smoke composition. Their study negated the possibility of decreased formation of PAHs as a result of fewer free radicals and other suggested changes in smoke chemistry. Boenig reviewed the literature on free radicals and health in 1966 (370, 371). In his reports, he considered the fundamental processes involved in the pyrolysis of tobacco during smoking, that is, distillation, steam distillation, thermal oxidation, decomposition, and thermal cracking (thermal cracking apparently playing a major role in this combustion). He emphasized that thermal cracking probably is the most important step, during which free radicals are formed. Interaction of a considerable proportion of these free radicals then leads to the formation of various types of molecules including the PAHs. He proposed a mechanism that would explain the formation of PAHs from various tobacco constituents and a variety of small reactive free radicals, for example, NO, hydroxyl, and alkyl. Later that year, he authored a paper in which he proposed a unifying concept that free radical exposure and health are intimately linked (372). Browning and Patton presented a paper at the 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference in 1966 on a quantitative analytical procedure to determine stable free radicals in tobacco smoke condensate by ESR (448). Their analytical method for the determination of stable free radicals in tobacco smoke condensate was generally applicable to all types of tobacco tars. Accuracy for the method was based upon standard coal reference samples that yielded 7.52 × 1016 spins/g of tar. The experimental precision was 10%. They discussed the limitations (heating effects, sample isolation and concentration, and solvent effects) and utility of the method. In 1966, Forbes reported on the role of free radicals in tobacco smoke carcinogenesis (1210). In that publication, he concluded that tobacco smoke condensates contained a variety of free radical species that had a broad range of stability. Some of the free radicals had life-times of only a few seconds, while others are stable over long periods of time. The chemical nature of the radicals formed in tobacco smoke was not fully identified. Forbes postulated that some of the free radicals formed resembled radicals obtained from benzo[a]pyrene. In 1967, Forbes et al. further examined free radicals present in tobacco smoke condensates by ESR (1211). They prepared and examined sulfuric acid solutions of smoke condensates. They reported that the free radical species present in sulfuric acid solutions of smoke condensates corresponded to a modified benzopyrene-type cation radical and to the spectrum of a modified anthracene cation radical, with the
1239
latter decaying fairly rapidly. No definitive proof was given for these two cation radicals. Rowlands et al. (27A101) studied the effect of MSS free radicals on the tissue of perfused rabbit lungs in 1967. The lungs were removed from the animals and attached to bell jars that were used to simulate the breathing operation. The animal blood was circulated through the veins and arteries attached to the lung while smoke were periodically drawn into the lung. The blood was then sampled and studied by ESR. They found a three-line ESR spectrum superimposed on a second broad singlet. They theorized that a covalent, hexa-coordinated ferric hemoglobin complex explained the ESR spectra. In 1968, Rowlands et al. (27A102) published an extension of their previous work in which the reaction of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) with hemoglobin was studied in more detail. In addition, the electron transfer properties of the smoke condensate were studied. The involvement of the oxides of nitrogen in the free radical properties of the smoke was suggested by a selective condensation experiment in which the smoke was fractionated at various temperatures and the various condensates reacted with hemoglobin. Cooper et al. published a paper (814) in the 1968 National Cancer Institute monograph Toward a Less Harmful Cigarette (4343) in which they suggested that free radicals in MSS were possible contributors to tobacco smoke carcinogenesis. They summarized research from the previous decade on free radicals in tobacco smoke and discussed the possible role of free radicals as a cause of cancer (814). It should be noted that as early as 1954, Dorn reviewed the published experimental evidence that indicated that the products formed by the combustion of tobacco may cause skin cancer in mice. He stated that compared to other known carcinogens, the combustion products of tobacco smoke are relatively weak. (27A30). In their 1967 book, Wynder and Hoffmann [see pp. 461–463 in (4332)] briefly described the studies on cigarette smoke free radicals conducted up to that time. Summing up the available evidence, they wrote: Several facts seem to exclude an importance of radicals in tobacco smoke condensate carcinogenesis. Even though sidestream smoke condensate contains only about one tenth the amount of free radicals found in the mainstream smoke condensate, the tumor response of both sidestream and mainstream “tar” on mouse skin is not different statistically … Since both types of radicals are present mainly in the particulate matter, it remains questionable whether in freshly generated tobacco smoke organic radicals participate in the carcinogenic effect.
During 1968, Stedman wrote his review on the chemical composition of tobacco and smoke (3797). In his review he summarized much of the prior work on free radicals in MSS. At that time, no free radicals in tobacco or tobacco smoke had been identified. As free radicals were considered to be playing some role in the induction of cancer, efforts were concentrated on determining the quantity of free radicals in smoke and their stability.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1239
11/24/08 2:38:17 PM
1240
In 1961, Larson et al. (2264) published their book on experimental and clinical studies on tobacco. Free radicals in smoke were not mentioned. However, in Supplements I, II, and III, issued successively in 1968, 1971, and 1975, respectively, Larson and Silvette (2266) summarized reported research on free radicals in tobacco smoke. In the nearly 800-page 1968 Supplement I, they reviewed the free-radical findings of Lyons and Spence (2432), Ingram (1861), Ingram and Allen (1862), and Westermark (4220a) in a few paragraphs. In the over 500-page 1971 Supplement II, Larson and Silvette summarized the findings on free radicals in tobacco smoke by Boenig (370, 371), Peacock and Spence (27A82b), and Cooper et al. (814) in less than a page. In the nearly 800page 1975 Supplement III, their only reference to radicals in tobacco smoke was in two separate paragraphs on a study by Dontenwill et al. (1046a) in which the specific tumorigenicities of the CSCs from control and tobacco treated with n-propyl gallate were compared. The n-propyl gallate was a known scavenger of free radicals. No tumorigenic difference was observed. During 1969, Rathkamp and Hoffmann (3086) reported on the inhibition of the pyrosynthesis of several selective smoke components. They suggested from the results of their pyrolysis studies on tobacco containing KNO3 or I2 that PAHs are at least partially formed via C and H free radicals. In 1969, Tully et al. (27A115) were the first authors to publish a study of the free radicals in the vapor phase of MSS cigarette smoke that was condensed at liquid oxygen temperature. The condensed vapor phase of MSS produced no ESR signal until the temperature of the ESR cavity holding the sample was raised to -100°C. At this temperature, a threeline ESR spectrum was obtained that had nitrogen splitting [a(N)] of 1.26 mT. For cigarettes made with tobacco that contained 3.4% copper nitrate by weight, a complex ESR spectrum consisting of at least seventeen lines was observed. The three-line spectrum from the untreated tobacco increased to a maximum intensity after 1.5 hr at -100°C. When warmed to room temperature, the ESR signals observed at -100°C vanished irreversibly. These authors concluded that the observed free radicals may have formed as a result of some unspecified participation by nitrogen oxides (NOx) in free radical reactions within the smoke. Interestingly, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), itself a free radical, adds to olefinic double bonds to produce carbon-centered free radicals [Estefan et al. (27A35)]. ESR spectra taken on solutions of NO2 mixed with different olefins show three-line spectra that are very much like those observed by Tully et al. (27A115). In each case, a three-line spectrum with a(N) = 1.22 to 1.33 mT is obtained [Estefan et al. (27A35), Bielski and Gebicki (27A09), Pryor et al. (27A91)]. Short-lived particulate- and vapor-phase free radicals that cannot be measured directly by ESR can be measured with the aid of spin traps. The first application of spin trapping to the study of free radicals in tobacco smoke was reported in 1971 by Bluhm et a1. (349). MSS from commercial cigarettes, pipes, and cigars was bubbled through solutions of α-phenylN-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) in benzene (a spin trap). In each case, a doublet of triplets with a(N) = 1.376 and a(H) = 0.199
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
mT was obtained along with a triplet with a(N) = 0.801 mT. The former splittings were assigned to an alkoxyl free radical adduct of PBN, while the latter signal was assigned to benzoyl tert-butylnitroxide (PBNOx). The intensity of the spinadduct signal from cigarette smoke was the weakest, while that from cigars was the strongest. The identity of the specific alkoxyl radical was not determined. Bilimoria et al. investigated the inhibition of radical initiated polymerization of vinyl acetate by tobacco smoke and some PAHs in 1973 (329). Their results indicated that vapor phase of smoke is an efficient inhibitor of vinyl acetate polymerization and that conjugated dienes like isoprene are responsible for the inhibition. There were no free radicals from tobacco smoke specifically identified in this research. Nisbet and Schmeller presented the results of this research at the 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference (TCRC) in 1973 (2789a). At that same TCRC in 1973, Johnson (1956) presented a paper on the antioxidant activity of tobacco smoke. The investigation was undertaken to determine whether or not smoke initiates or promotes the formation of radical peroxides which would in turn lead to lipid peroxidation. He found that both the vapor phase and particulate phase of smoke behaved as an antioxidant. Fractionation of the total smoke condensate showed antioxidant activity in the neutral and water-insoluble acidic fractions, with virtually no activity in the basic fractions. The mode of antioxidant action of tobacco smoke was discussed in terms of free radical mechanisms involving atom transfer, addition, substitution, and coupling. De Hys et al. in 1973 (27A25) studied the spin trapping of free radicals in the filtered MSS of 1R1 research cigarettes. They obtained spin-adduct spectra that did not exhibit hydrogen splitting, although the three-line spectra were very broad (the hydrogen splitting was not resolved). They reported that smoke held in the syringe for 15 sec before being bubbled through the PBN solution showed no change in spectral features, while smoke held in the syringe for 30 sec resulted in a 50% decrease in the spin-adduct spectral intensity. These authors also found that spin trapping unfiltered smoke resulted in no spin-adduct spectra. Experiments were also performed using 2-nitrosotoluene and 5-nitroso-8-quinolinol as spin traps. In the first case, a three-line spectrum was obtained with a(N) = 1.56 mT, while the second spin trap gave no spin adduct. No attempt was made to identify the free radical trapped with 2-nitrosotoluene. These results indicate that time and smoke filtration impact free radical collection and measurement. NO2 was bubbled through a solution of PBN in benzene and the resulting solution studied by ESR. A strong three-line ESR spectrum with a(N) = 1.0 mT was observed. Smoke bubbled through cyclohexene produced no ESR signal, although NO2 can react with olefins to give the three-line spectrum described above (27A35, 27A09, 27A91). These authors concluded that the free radicals in the vapor phase of cigarette MSS have half-lives of about 30 sec and that NO2 is not the dominant free radical species responsible for production of spin-adducts from cigarette smoke.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1240
11/24/08 2:38:17 PM
Free Radicals
In 1974, Morie evaluated the effectiveness of free radical traps in cellulose acetate filters for the removal of nitrogen oxides from cigarette smoke (2625). Four free radical spin traps were tested as cigarette filter additives for the removal of nitrogen oxides from tobacco smoke. A filter consisting of cellulose acetate fibers containing 20 mg of 4-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzylidene)-tert-butylamine N-oxide removed 42% of the nitrogen oxides from cigarette smoke. Three other free radical traps when placed on cellulose acetate fibers or activated carbon within cigarette filters reduced the concentration of nitrogen oxides in the smoke to a lesser extent. The mechanism proposed by Morie for the removal of nitrogen oxides was that the free radical spin trap reacted with a free radical in the tobacco smoke to yield a long-lived nitroxide radical, which in turn reacts with nitrogen oxides in the smoke. A spin-trapping study of the free radicals in the MSS from 1R1 research cigarettes was performed by Menzel et al. in 1976 (27A72). These authors used spin-adduct spectral line broadening to determine that the MSS vapor phase results in 1 × 1018 spin-trapped free radicals per cigarette puff (about 1019 spins/g of tar produced). Using spin-trap solutions in series, they estimated the efficiency of spin trapping of the tobacco smoke free radicals with PBN to be about 47%. They obtained extremely broad spectral lines (by ESR) showing no hydrogen splitting. Their results were somewhat suspect as the spin-adduct concentration that they obtained (2 × 1019 spins/g) was much larger than any other free radical concentration reported before or since (2429, 2435, 27A95). During 1976, Pryor edited and contributed to a book on free radicals in biology (2998a). In that book, he discussed free radicals in cigarette smoke and the possible action of free radicals in smokers. A comprehensive study of free radicals in the vapor phase of MSS produced by 1R1 research cigarettes was reported in 1976 by Pryor et al. (27A95). Using three different spin traps, PBN, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO), and 3,5-(di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-N-tertbutylnitrone (OHPBN), they found that MSS produces three types of spin adducts: an alkoxyl or aroyloxyl spin-adduct, PBNOx, and an unknown adduct with a(N) = 1.00 mT. They reported that the intensity of the alkoxyl adduct increases with the distance that the smoke must travel from the cigarette to the spin-trap solution and then decreased thereafter. They called this phenomenon the path length effect. The concentration of spin-trapped free radicals was found to be about 1 × 1015 spins/g of tar. In addition, the effect of aging on the absolute and relative concentrations of the spin adducts was studied. The conditions of collection also had an impact on free radical measurement. Their data did not allow them to specify the identity of either the aromatic group in the aroyloxy (ArCO2˙) radical or the alkyl group in the alkoxy (RO˙) radicals. Ishiguro and Sugawara published their review on chemistry of tobacco smoke in 1980 (1884). This was the last major review of compounds identified in tobacco smoke. In their massive report they reviewed the literature on free radicals in
1241
tobacco smoke. There were no identified free radicals specifically mentioned in their review. They stated that: The study of radicals in smoke has not advanced very far because of the difficulty of identifying the radicals. It is hoped that further progress will be made in this field so that the formation routes of many components can be understood and the composition of smoke components can be better controlled.
In a paper written in 1982 entitled “Free Radical Biology: Xenobiotics, Cancer, and Aging,” Pryor suggested that free radicals in cigarette MSS could pose a significant health risk to smokers (2998b). In that paper he proposed several complicated interactions between MSS components, for example, NO, dienes, phenols, and free radicals that he believed were operative means leading to carcinogenesis. In 1983, Slaga et al. suggested that free radicals may be involved not only in initiation but also in the promotion of carcinogenesis (3687). In 1983, using ESR spin-trapping techniques with PBN as the spin trap, Pryor et al. (2999a) observed free radicals in the vapor phase of both cigarette MSS and SSS. The principal vapor-phase free radicals appeared to be alkoxyl radicals (RO˙). Pryor et al. determined that each of the vapor phases of cigarette MSS and SSS has about the same concentration of radicals, about 1 × 1016 radicals per cigarette (or 5 × 1014 per puff) (2999a). In that same year, Pryor et al. (2999) examined and found that the particulate matter from both MSS and SSS contained persistent free radicals. The ESR signal was obtained when the particulate matter collected on Cambridge pads was measured directly and when the particulate matter was extracted from the Cambridge pad with various solvents. Pryor et al. listed the occurrence of four paramagnetic radical species in CSC. Three of these radicals, an inorganic phosphorus radical, a graphitic carbon associated radical, and a radical that appeared associated with an odd electron delocalized over an aromatic ring system, appeared to have relatively short half-lives. However, the fourth type of free radical had an unusually long half-life of several days. It was speculated that the dominant ESR signal from this fourth type was from free radicals generated from catechol and hydroquinone. Neither of these free radicals was identified unequivocally (2999). Treatment of alcoholic solutions of particulate matter with base generated a new group of radicals that appeared to be semiquinone radicals derived from the oxidation of phenolic and polyphenolic species in the particulate matter. Pryor et al. suggested this latter radical was associated with a quinone/hydroquinone acceptor/ donor chain (2999). Again, the identification of the specific free radicals was not obtained. In these two papers and again in 1984 (3001), Pryor et al. suggested the possible involvement of particulate-phase MSS free radicals in smoking-related diseases (2999, 2999a). In vitro assays were performed that suggested that cigarette smoke may cause oxidative stress or oxidative damage to essential biological molecules (3000, 27A120). Specifically in 1984,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1241
11/24/08 2:38:18 PM
1242
ESR evidence of the binding of the particulate-phase MSS free radicals to DNA and polynucleotides was shown (3001). In the 1984 American Chemical Society monograph on chemical carcinogenesis, edited by Searle (3568) and with contributions from experts in carcinogenesis, there was no mention of the carcinogenicity of free radicals, nor any tumorigenic PAH or aza-arene in tobacco smoke, despite the reports by Snook et al. (3756–3759, 3750, 3752, 1544, 3664, 3665, 3908). In 1985, Nakayama et al. published a report that described the generation and identification of H2O2 and superoxide anion radical from cigarette smoke (2677). H2O2 and superoxide anion radical were generated in a neutral buffer solution through which cigarette smoke was bubbled. They speculated that the H2O2 may have been formed by the autooxidation of polyphenols such as catechol and hydroquinone in the cigarette smoke. During 1985, Halpern and Knieper isolated and tentatively identified the tert-butoxy radical by the spin trapping of radicals in the vapor phase of cigarette smoke (27A44). Cosgrove et al. in 1985 (828a) showed that it was possible to detect hydroxyl radicals in an aqueous extract of the particulate phase of cigarette MSS under metal-mediated conditions. An unidentified alkyl radical and the carbon dioxide anion radical were also observed under their experimental conditions. They concluded that the results of their experiment indicated that the major particulate-phase free radical was a quinone/hydroquinone redox system in a polymeric matrix and that the radical signal could become associated with DNA. Unequivocal proof was not provided for these claims. Church and Pryor in a 1985 publication (746) summarized their work (to that point) on the free radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its toxicological implications. They stated that cigarette smoke contains two very different populations of free radicals, one in the particulate phase and one in the vapor phase. The particulate phase contains several relatively stable free radicals. Church and Pryor stated that they had “identified” the principal radical as a quinone/hydroquinone complex (QH/QH 2) held in the tarry matrix. However, no unequivocal identification was ever made. They suggested that this QH/QH 2 complex was an active redox system that is capable of reducing molecular oxygen to produce superoxide, eventually leading to H2O2 and hydroxyl radicals. In that same publication, Church and Pryor (746) stated that the vapor phase of cigarette smoke contains small oxygenand carbon-centered radicals that are much more reactive than the particulate-phase radicals. Although no vapor-phase radicals were specifically identified, they stated that the vapor-phase radicals do not arise from the initial combustion of the tobacco, but are rather produced in a steady state by the oxidation of NO to NO2, which then reacts with reactive species already present in smoke, such as isoprene. They suggested that these reactive vapor-phase free radicals and the metastable products derived from the radical reactions may be responsible for the inactivation of α1-proteinase inhibitor by fresh smoke.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Church and Pryor (746) proposed that the excess superoxide that is expected to form in lung tissue exposed to cigarette smoke is one possible means of inactivating α1-protease inhibitor, a protein associated with the onset of emphysema in deficient individuals. In the same report, the authors noted that after particulate-phase MSS was incubated with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), an ESR signal was observed in the recovered DNA. Later, it was suggested that hydroxyl free radicals generated from the particulate-phase MSS free radicals may cause DNA damage [Kiyosawa et al. (27A60), Pryor (27A85), Pryor et al. (27A93)]. Later in 1992, Pryor (27A85) noted that such molecular damage is not unique to tobacco smoke, but also occurs with smoke from other sources, such as Diesel fuel and wood. In 1986, Pryor wrote a paper on the formation, lifetimes, and reactions of oxy-radicals and related species (2998c). In his overview, he discussed some of the ways in which free radicals and other highly reactive species are produced in biological systems. He discussed the reactivity and lifetimes of these species and listed some pathological conditions and chronic diseases in which these species may be involved. He discussed that cigarette smoking is a rich source of free radicals and that much of the toxicity associated with cigarette smoking may be due to the presence of free radicals in MSS. In 1986, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) issued its monograph on tobacco smoking (1870). Free radicals in tobacco smoke were discussed: Smoke can be a major indirect or direct source of chemical oxidants and radicals, and also causes a rapid influx of pulmonary alveolar macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutraphils in the lung. These actively phagocytic cells release a variety of oxidative intermediates when exposed to particulates such as those in cigarette smoke. The intermediates found in cigarette smoke and/or released by activated macrophages include superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radical.
Other than referring to the article on free radicals in cigarette smoke by Church and Pryor (746), IARC cited none of the many other pre-1986 references to free radicals in tobacco, for example, Bilimoria et al. (329), Bluhm et al. (349), Boenig (370–372), Browning and Patton (448), Cooper et al. (814), Cosgrove et al. (828a), Forbes (1210), Forbes et al. (1211), Ingram (1861), Ingram and Allen (1862), Lyons et al. (2429), Lyons and Spence (2432, 2435), Marsden and Collins (2466), Morie (2625), Nakayama et al. (2677), Nisbet and Schmeller (2789a), Pryor (2998a, 2998b), Pryor et al. (2999, 2999a, 3001), Slaga et al. (3687), and Takeshita and Ohe (3864). During the 1980s, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) developed a new cigarette product called Premier that heated rather than burned tobacco. A tremendous amount of research was conducted on that product prior to introduction. The research on Premier was summarized in a monograph by RJRT (3190). Free radical analyses comparing the Premier product and University of Kentucky 1R4F reference cigarette were conducted by Rice and Hayes in 1989 (1555c, 3129). In two studies, they reported that Premier had
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1242
11/24/08 2:38:18 PM
Free Radicals
a 99% reduction in vapor- and particulate-phase free radicals compared to the 1R4F reference cigarette. Similar ESR spectra were obtained but the yields of radicals in both phases were decreased. In the 1R4F cigarette, the particulate-matter free radicals appeared to be from species with an odd electron delocalized over an aromatic ring system, for example, a PAH. The second source of particulate-matter free radicals appeared to come from what Church and Pryor (746) suggested was a donor/acceptor chain involving hydroquinone as the donor and quinone as the acceptor. ESR analysis of 1R4F vapor phase indicated the presence of radical species similar to those previously reported for tobacco-burning cigarettes. No identification of specific free radicals was conducted in these studies. In 1988, O’Brien (27A82a) discussed the fate of free radicals and their effect on chemical carcinogenesis. Only one comment was included on cigarette smoke and it involved the PAH B[a]P in MSS and the assertion of its involvement in lung cancer induction. O’Brien stated that PAHs like B[a]P donate a single electron to an enzyme which may be involved in the generation of tumorigenic diol-epoxides of the PAH. In 1989, Nakayama et al. (27A79) reported on a reliable method for the detection and quantitation of H2O2 generated in aqueous extracts of cigarette smoke tar. Aqueous tar extracts (ACT) were passed through a short reverse-phase column and the H2O2 concentration was determined by differential pulse polarography using an automatic reference subtraction system. The H2O2 concentration in the ACT increased with aging, pH, and temperature; the presence of superoxide dismutase led to lower H2O2 concentrations. Their method was applied to several types of research and commercial cigarettes. They reported that, with few exceptions, the amount of H2O2 formed after a fixed time from each cigarette smoke was proportional to its tar yield. Brunmark and Cadenas (27A15) reviewed the major mechanisms that are involved in quinone-induced cytotoxicity in 1989. The redox chemistry of quinoid compounds was surveyed in terms of (1) reactions involving only electron transfers, such as those accomplished during the enzymatic reduction of quinones and nonenzymatic interaction with redox couples generating semiquinones, and (2) nucleophilic addition reactions. In their explanation of the mechanisms involved, quinone is reduced to the hydroquinone or semiquinone radical by cellular reductase. The semiquinone radical then undergoes rapid autooxidation with the generation of the parent quinone and concomitant formation of superoxide. The hydroquinone reacts rapidly with superoxide to form H2O2 and the semiquinone. In 1992, Pryor (27A85) reviewed, compared, and contrasted the chemistry of cigarette smoke, wood smoke, and the smoke from plastics and building materials that was inhaled by persons trapped in fires. He contended that cigarette smoke produced cancer, emphysema, and other diseases after a delay of years. He discussed that acute exposure to smoke from a fire could produce a loss of lung function and lead to death after a delay of days or weeks. Tobacco smoke and the smoke inhaled in a burning building have
1243
some similarities from a chemical viewpoint, for example, both contain high concentrations of CO and other combustion products. In addition, both contain varied concentrations of free radicals, which if inhaled could lead to biological harm (27A65). At this time, personnel in Pryor’s laboratory had studied these free radicals, largely by ESR methods, for about 15 years. The article reviewed what was known about the radicals present in these different types of smokes, soots, and tars. His article summarized the evidence that suggested that free radicals could be involved in cigarette-induced pathology and smoke-inhalation deaths. In 1993, Diana and Pryor edited a book entitled Tobacco Smoking and Nutrition: Influence of Nutrition on TobaccoAssociated Health Risks (960c). In that book, Pryor and Stone wrote a chapter on oxidants (free radicals, H2O2, peroxynitrate, and peroxynitrite) in cigarette smoke (3000). They reported that methyl nitrite (CH3ONO), NO, and NO2 were primary oxidants in the vapor phase of MSS and that the proposed quinone/semiquinone/hydroquinone equilibrium complex was the primary oxidant in particulate-phase MSS. They postulated that peroxynitrite (HOO-N=O) and/ or peroxynitrate (HOO-NO2) or their esters (RO-ONO and RO-ONO2) were present in the vapor phase of MSS. They argued that hydroxyl radicals were generated from H2O2 via the Fenton reaction (27A36), that carbon-centered radicals were generated from dienes in MSS, and that peroxyl radicals (ROO˙), alkoxyl radicals (RO˙), and superoxide radicals (O˙-) were present in the vapor phase of MSS. In that same book, Niki et al. reviewed information on membrane damage from lipid oxidation by free radicals in cigarette smoke (2786a). Cigarette smoke contains metals and metal ions (see Chapter 20). Certain metal ions are important in free radical reactions, for example, Fenton-type metal catalyzed free radical reactions. In 1993, Li and Trush (27A67) reported on the oxidation of hydroquinone by copper and provided chemical mechanisms for the generation of quinone species and their biological effects. Since the interaction of several xenobiotics with copper had been shown to result in their metabolism, Li and Trush investigated the role of copper in the oxidation of hydroquinone (HQ) and HQ-induced toxicity to mice bone marrow stromal cells, target cells of HQ in the bone marrow. In phosphate-buffered saline, HQ underwent autooxidation slowly to benzoquinone (BQ), while the presence of Cu2+ ions (1 to 50 µM) strongly accelerated the oxidation of HQ to BQ in a concentration-dependent manner. Reaction of HQ with Cu2+ was also accompanied by the reduction of Cu2+ to Cu1+, the utilization of O2, and the concomitant generation of H2O2. Their results indicate that Cu2+ strongly induced the oxidation of HQ and as such may be a factor involved in the oxidative activation and toxicity of HQ in target cells. As copper, HQ and BQ are known components of MSS, the relevance of the work of Li and Trush became important in light of the postulated mechanism of Pryor and Stone (3000). Cueto and Pryor in 1994 (27A21), following up on the report by Pryor and Stone in 1993 (3000), reported their work on the conversion of NO to NO2 by Fourier Transform IR. They also reported their results on the reactions of olefins
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1243
11/24/08 2:38:18 PM
1244
with nitrogen oxides. In order to explain the apparent longevity of the presumably short-lived free radicals in aging filtered smoke, a steady-state production mechanism was proposed involving oxygen, nitrogen oxides, and vapor-phase olefins. No specific reaction products were discussed. Tanigawa et al. (27A112) published a paper on the spin trapping of superoxide in aqueous solutions of fresh and aged cigarette smoke in 1994. Superoxide generation was determined as a function of the age of the smoke using spin trapping. 5,5-Dimethylpyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) was used as the spin trap. The superoxide adduct of DMPO was detected in a solution of fresh MSS for over 1 hr. The superoxidegenerating potential of smoke was rapidly lost as the smoke was kept in a plastic syringe. Smoke aged for 3 min did not generate superoxide. Additional evidence of superoxide generation in aqueous solutions of cigarette smoke was obtained by the chemiluminescence method. Church in 1994 (27A19) published an article on the spin trapping of organic radicals. In that article, he postulated a steady-state mechanism that he believed explained the formation of longer-lived vapor-phase free radicals in cigarette MSS. The proposed mechanism was based on the observation that NO2 concentration in MSS followed the concentration of the free radicals in the vapor phase of MSS. In 1995, Stone et al. (27A111) reviewed the previous work conducted in the laboratories of Pryor, which showed that extracts from MSS or SSS nicked DNA. These solutions were believed to contain the semiquinone free radical. Aged solutions of catechol containing a semiquinone species that had ESR properties similar to those of the radical in cigarette tar extracts were used as a model for the MSS particulatephase radical. Both the radical in aged catechol solutions and the cigarette tar radical become associated with the DNA in mammalian cells and nicked DNA. The nicking of DNA caused by both the MSS particulate-phase radical and aged catechol solutions followed saturation kinetics. The authors believed that aged catechol solutions could be used as a model for the MSS particulate-phase radical. Unfortunately, their model did not take into account the fact that MSS is a complex mixture and that other constituents in MSS could have altered their finding. In 1995 Stohs and Bagchi (27A109) reviewed the role of reactive oxygen species, with the subsequent oxidative deterioration of biological macromolecules in the toxicities associated with transition metal ions. Studies have shown that metals, including iron, copper, chromium, and vanadium undergo redox cycling, and that this cycling can result in the production of reactive oxygen species such as superoxide ion, H2O2, and hydroxyl radical. As a consequence, lipid peroxidation can be enhanced, DNA can be damaged, and calcium and sulfhydryl homeostasis can be altered. Various studies have suggested that the ability to generate reactive oxygen species by redox cycling quinones and related compounds may require metal ions. Cigarette MSS contains metal ions. Some mechanisms associated with the toxicities of metal ions are very similar to the effects produced by many organic xenobiotics. Specific differences in the toxicities of metal ions may be
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
related to differences in solubility, the complex mixture containing the metal, absorbability, transport, chemical reactivity, and the complexes that are formed within the body. Their review summarized studies (through 1995) that had been conducted with transition metal ions, regarding the production of reactive oxygen species and oxidative tissue damage. In 1995, Li et al. (27A66) reported on ESR evidence for the generation of reactive oxygen species from the coppermediated oxidation of the benzene metabolite hydroquinone and its possible role in DNA damage. Prior to this study, Li and Trush (27A67) had observed that Cu2+ strongly induces the oxidation of hydroquinone (HQ), producing benzoquinone and H2O2 through a Cu2+/Cu1+ redox cycle mechanism. The oxidation of HQ by Cu2+ also resulted in plasmid DNA cleavage. In this study, using ESR spectroscopy, they investigated whether this chemical-metal redox system could generate reactive oxygen species that induce DNA damage. Studies were not performed with cigarette MSS but were conducted on solutions of HQ. Results indicated that both H2O2 and Cu1+ are critical for the formation of reactive oxygen from the HQ/Cu2+ systems. Aerobic conditions were necessary for the redox system to function. Reactive oxygen scavengers significantly inhibited the redox mechanism. Overall, the results indicated that it is possible through a copper-redox cycling mechanism, to generate a reactive oxygen species of HQ that may participate in DNA damage. The conditions of the experiments were not those that a smoker would experience. Zang et al. investigated the presence of free radicals in aqueous extracts of cigarette tar by ESR (27A122) in 1995. They demonstrated that aqueous extracts of cigarette tar (ACT) autooxidized to produce semiquinone, hydroxyl, and superoxide radicals in air-saturated, buffered aqueous solutions. Semiquinone species were detected by direct ESR measurements and were tentatively identified as o- and p-benzosemiquinone radicals by comparison with the ESR signals of catechol and hydroquinone radicals under similar conditions. The rate of formation of these radicals was dependent on pH. Hydroxyl and superoxide radicals were detected as 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) spin adducts by ESR spin trapping. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (20 units/mL) inhibited the formation of the superoxide spin adduct of DMPO completely. Addition of Fe2+ to this system increased the ESR signal intensity of hydroxyl radical spin adduct of DMPO. Their results indicated that superoxide and hydroxyl radicals are produced during the autooxidation of hydroquinone- and catechol-related species in ACT under the specific conditions of their experiments. Borgerding et al. (27A13) presented a paper at the 1995 TCRC on a method for the quantitative determination of free radicals in the vapor phase of cigarette MSS. The method was based on trapping free radicals in a α-phenyl-N-tertbutylnitrone (PBN)/benzene solution to form a stable radical species, that is, spin trapping, followed by detection with an ESR spectrometer. Two smoke collection techniques were discussed which differed in the extent of smoke aging prior to spin trapping. Both techniques were found to be acceptable for the comparison of cigarette smoke yields. Free
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1244
11/24/08 2:38:18 PM
Free Radicals
radical analysis of the vapor phase of MSS from cigarettes that contained a novel carbon filter and experimental low N-containing tobacco blend demonstrated that vapor-phase free radical reductions on the order of 80% were possible when compared to other equivalent “tar” cigarettes. At the same conference in 1995, Blakley et al. (27A10) reported the results of their studies on MSS vapor-phase radical formation and possible formation mechanisms. Church and Pryor (746) had previously suggested a mechanism for formation of mainstream vapor-phase radicals that involved a reaction between NO2 and reactive dienes, such as isoprene. Experiments were conducted to systematically explore the proposed mechanism. Included in the experiments were cigarettes from different “tar” categories, cigarettes comprising a new type of carbon filter [Blakley et al. (27A12)] and blends, and cigarettes that primarily heated, rather than burned, tobacco. Some results indicated that the suggested NO2/diene mechanism was viable, while other results did not support the Church-Pryor mechanism. For many of the cigarettes studied, vapor-phase radical yields increased as either isoprene or NOx smoke yields increased. [It should be noted that in 1978, Cooper and Hege (816) reported that there is very little NO2 in cigarette smoke, most of the NOx is NO.] However, in a series of experimental cigarettes where isoprene yield was held constant and NOx levels substantially increased, vapor-phase free radicals were dramatically reduced. In addition, preliminary research suggested that some processed tobaccos yielded diminished radicals as compared to unprocessed tobaccos, while NOx smoke concentrations remained constant. Data were also presented on a cigarette constructed from wood shavings that produced a substantial free-radical response with virtually no isoprene or NOx present in the smoke. In 1996 Rahman and MacNee (27A96, 27A97) reviewed the literature on the imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants concerning the pathogenesis of smoking-induced lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly emphysema. There was evidence that indicated that increased neutrophil sequestration and activation occurred in the pulmonary microvasculature in smokers and in patients with COPD, with the potential to release reactive oxygen species. Reactive oxygen species generated by airspace phagocytes or inhaled directly from the environment can increase the oxidant burden and may contribute to the epithelial damage. Although much research has focused on the protease/antiprotease theory of the pathogenesis of emphysema, less attention had been paid to the role of reactive oxygen species in this condition. The possible effects of the increased oxidant burden in smokers and in patients with COPD are opposed by the lung antioxidant defenses. In their article, they reviewed the evidence for the presence of an oxidant/antioxidant imbalance in smoking-induced lung disease and its relevance to therapy in these conditions. They noted that the involvement of MSS vapor-phase free radicals in oxidative damage was unclear because generally the reactive vapor-phase free radicals in MSS are quenched immediately on contact with the moist surfaces of the respiratory tract.
1245
In 1997, Kodama et al. (27A62) analyzed multiple components in cigarette smoke for their ability to form active oxygen species using a spin-trapping agent, 5, 5-dimethyl-1pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO). The main source of O2 and H2O2 was ascribed to polyphenols in a particulate phase of MSS. Hydroxyl free radicals (OH˙) were identified in the vapor phase of MSS. Carbonyl sulfide in the vapor phase was shown to be a source of DMPO-OH adduct. NO in the vapor phase of MSS did not show appreciable reactivity. They added that the quantification and identification of active oxygen species in cigarette smoke could provide important information for elucidating the mechanism of tobacco carcinogenesis, as certain types and concentrations of free radicals have shown genotoxic effects to induce DNA strand breaks, as well as epigenetic effects, to act as cell proliferation signals. In 1997, Pryor summarized the free radical mechanisms developed in his laboratory over the previous twenty-one years (27A86). He stated: Cigarette smoke is a rich source of free radicals, as well as other oxidants and puts an oxidative burden on the entire organism. Smoke contains two phases, operationally defined as gas-phase smoke, which passes through a glassfiber Cambridge filter and particulate matter, or tar, which is retained on the filter. Gas-phase smoke contains reactive, short-lived radicals that can be detected and quantified using electron spin resonance (ESR) spin trap methods. The radicals in gas-phase smoke do not result from the flame directly, but rather are continuously generated by the oxidation of NO to NOx, which then adds to reactive species in the smoke (primarily isoprene) to give R˙ radicals, which react with O2, to give RO- and ROO˙ radicals. Gas-phase smoke, with up to 500 ppm NO as well as oxy-radicals, also produces a variety of reactive nitrogen species (RNS), including HOONO, NOONO˙, ROONO˙, and ROONO˙. Gas-phase smoke oxidizes α-I-antiproteinase by a process involving H2O2 and RNS. Cigarette tar contains a stable semiquinone radical Q -˙, that can be observed by direct ESR; the tar radical reduces O, and thus aqueous cigarette tar (ACT) extracts contain O2-˙, H2O2 and ˙OH. The tar radical binds to and associates with DNA (both by ESR and by 14C). ACT extracts nick DNA, and ˙OH or a species like it are responsible for the damage. Fractionation of ACT shows that the fractions that contain the tar radical O2-˙ are responsible for >85% of the nicks.
In 1997, Stohs et al. (27A110) reviewed the potential of metal ions reacting in conjunction with other constituents of tobacco smoke to cause cellular damage by free radical reactions. Various studies had demonstrated the role of reactive oxygen species in the toxicity of transition metals. They concluded that the presence of several reactive metal ions in tobacco smoke indicates that there may be a role for metal ions in the subsequent toxicity and carcinogenicity of tobacco smoke. They described the metal-catalyzed mechanisms that might be involved. By the early 1990s, free radicals generated from MSS were considered a significant health risk because of their potential involvement in oxidative stress. Müller et al. (27A77) reported that NO in cigarette smoke could react with
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1245
11/24/08 2:38:18 PM
1246
superoxide derived from the reducing constituents in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke to form peroxynitrite (ONOO-). NO may also be converted to a number of more reactive nitrogen derivatives, such as NO2, dinitrogen trioxide (N2O3), and dinitrogen tetraoxide (N2O4). Their results were consistent with a rapid NO-consuming reaction coupled with superoxide-generating properties of the particulate phase of MSS. The roles of superoxide (O2˙-), peroxynitrite, and carbon dioxide (CO2) in the oxidative chemistry of NO was reviewed by Squadrito and Pryor (27A106) in 1998. Each of these reactive oxygen species can cause biological damage at high concentrations. They contended that NO and superoxide are produced by several cell types and can rapidly combine to form peroxynitrite. Peroxynitrite is a potent and versatile oxidant that can attack a wide range of biological targets, if not held in check. In previous publications, Pryor implied that NO and superoxide (both known MSS components) could be linked to numerous diseases associated with smoking. Of course, CO2 is also present in MSS. Peroxynitrite is normally scavenged by antioxidants, but CO2 can also compete with certain antioxidants. Squadrito and Pryor proposed a mechanism for the reaction of CO2 with OONO˙ that produced metastable nitrating, nitrosating, and oxidizing species as intermediates. An analysis of the lifetimes of the possible intermediates and of the catalysis of peroxynitrite decomposition suggested that the reactive intermediates responsible for reactions with a variety of substrates may be the free radicals NO2 and CO3˙-. In closing, Squadrito and Pryor noted that increased formation of peroxynitrite has been linked to Alzheimer disease, rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, lung injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and other diseases. Flicker and Green (27A38) developed a new HPLC method for the detection of free radicals in cigarette smoke and diesel exhaust in 1998. Carbon-centered radicals were trapped from the vapor phase of cigarette smoke and diesel engine exhaust by reaction with a nitroxide, 3-amino-2,2,5,5tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy (3AP). The resulting mixture of stable, diamagnetic adducts was derivatized with naphthalenedicarboxaldehyde (NDA) to produce highly fluorescent products. Derivatives were separated by HPLC, which revealed distinctly different sets of radicals present in the two systems. Integration of HPLC peaks gave approximately 22 ± 7 nmol of radicals per cigarette and 3 ± 1 nmol of radicals per liter of diesel engine exhaust. An estimated eight to ten different carbon-centered radical species are present in each system. No identification of the free radicals was made. In 1999, Halliwell and Gutteridge (27A41) published a second edition of their book Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. It has become a classic text in the field of free radical and antioxidant research. In their book, they reviewed the role of free radicals in the life and biomedical sciences and provided methods available to measure reactive species and oxidative damage (and their potential pitfalls), as well as the importance of antioxidants in the human diet. It is important to note that free radicals in cigarettes were not discussed, although, their text has often been cited concerning oxidizing
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
species/free radicals found in MSS that are known to cause oxidative damage in essential biomolecules. In 1999, a World Patent was granted to Emami on a cigarette filter additive to capture and remove free radicals from cigarette MSS (27A34). The filter additives described in the patent were based on natural polyphenols which efficiently scavenge free radicals in cigarette smoke. Among the various polyphenols tested, oils of rosemary extracts from Rosemarinus officinialis L. proved to be the most active in reducing the yields of both vapor- and particulate-phase free radicals. The additive-containing filters were stable at high temperature, had a twelve-month shelf-life, were not air sensitive, and had normal pressure drop characteristics. Emami et al. reported on the free radical scavenging efficiency of the cigarette filters containing rosemary extract in 2000 (1143). Employing ESR, Emami et al. were only able to tentatively identify the presence of hydroxyl, methoxyl, and cyano free radicals in MSS. Unfortunately, ESR techniques alone give poor structural information on the nature of free radicals. In 2000, Liu et al. (2380a) presented their research on the design of a unique low-“tar” cigarette designed to yield approximately 40% less particulate-phase free radicals. The cigarette employed a special filter, casing additives to reduce free radicals (vitamin E, vitamin A, cysteine, and selenic compounds of mannitol), a specially formulated casing with burn control agents, expanded tobacco, and tobacco filler rich in selenium. Although it was not possible to determine the interactive effects of all the changes in the uniquely designed cigarette, ESR results confirmed a reduction in particulatephase free radicals. Blakley et al. (27A11) published a paper in 2001 that questioned published reports postulating that the particulatephase free radicals of cigarette MSS consisted of a hydroquinone/semiquinone/quinone shuttle. Their results showed that there was no positive correlation between the smoke yield of hydroquinone and the presence of particulate-phase free radicals. When a tenfold reduction in MSS hydroquinone yield was obtained when KNO3 was applied to the surface of tobacco of an American blended cigarette, there was no significant corresponding change in the yield of particulate-phase free radicals. In experiments testing MSS from low- and high-hydroquinone-yielding tobaccos there was no consistent corresponding relationship between hydroquinone and particulate-phase radical yields. In one series of blends there was at best an inverse relationship between hydroquinone and particulate-phase radical yields. In contrast with the published literature, Blakley et al. concluded that the particular compound or compounds driving particulate-phase free radical formation are currently unknown. Flicker and Green (27A37) published an improved method for trapping carbon-centered free radicals (R˙) from the vapor phase of the MSSs from cigarettes and cigars in 2001. They compared free radical concentrations trapped from various cigarettes and model smoke systems. Using a nitroxide trap, 3-amino-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy (3AP), on solid support, they trapped radicals directly from the vapor phase, washed them off the support, and analyzed them with HPLC.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1246
11/24/08 2:38:19 PM
Free Radicals
Separation of the trapped radicals showed that the vapor phase of smoke from each cigarette type produced a unique set of free radicals (four to ten distinct peaks). Vapor mixtures used to model tobacco smoke consisted of NO, air, isoprene, and methanol. The model systems produced a set of free radicals that consisted of four major and several minor peaks, two of which matched peaks in tobacco smoke chromatograms. Quantities of free radicals trapped from cigarettes tested varied from 54 ± 2 nmol to 66 ± 9 nmol. The cigar tested produced 185 ± 9 nmol of free radicals. In their experiments, oxygen competed with the nitroxide trap for MSS vapor-phase radicals. A kinetic analysis of the O2 competition shows that actual radical concentrations in the smoke were approximately 100-fold higher than measured. Valavanidis and Haralambous reported in 2001 (27A118) on the free radical populations in the MSS and SSS of cigarettes with conventional acetate filters compared to biofilters (BF) that claimed reductions in yields of certain toxic substances and oxidants in the vapor phase of the MSS (Deliconstantinos et al. 27A26) They found that BF cigarette smoke had similar tar radical species with the same intensity ESR signals to those of the other cigarettes containing cellulose acetate filters. The ability of the aqueous cigarette tar extracts to produce hydroxyl radicals in the cigarettes with the BF filter was very similar to, or even higher than, the other three brands tested. The vapor phase of the MSS of the BF cigarette showed a 30% to 35% reduction in the production of oxygen-centered radicals. In the case of the SSS, BF cigarettes produced substantially higher concentrations of vapor-phase free radicals, compared to the other brands. Their results suggested that cigarettes with the BF were partially effective at removing some of the vapor-phase oxidants but not effective in the reduction of tar and its radical species in the MSS and SSS. In their paper at the 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference (TSRC) in 2001, Wooten et al. reviewed free radicals and proposed mechanisms for their generation in tobacco smoke (4277). Their review was mainly a synopsis of work published by Pryor and his colleagues over the previous twenty years. No specifically identified free radicals were presented. The free radical NO is both found in all living organisms and is required for many physiological functions. NO is also an important regulatory molecule for immune response and cytotoxicity. It is naturally produced from l-arginine by NO synthases (NOS). As a free radical, it produces many reactive intermediates that account for its bioactivity. NO is also a component of MSS. One mechanism for NO-induced cytotoxicity was through its interaction with superoxide to produce peroxynitrite, which can cause DNA damage. Müller et al. (27A76) and Squadrito and Pryor (27A106) previously suggested that this same mechanism may be operative for free radicals in MSS. In 2001, Lala and Chakraborty published a paper on the role of NO in carcinogenesis and tumor progression (27A64). However, they also suggested that selective inhibitors of NOS may have a therapeutic role in certain cancers associated with free radicals.
1247
In 2002, Takanami et al. reviewed their research on the detection of free radicals in vapor phase of cigarette smoke by ESR at the 56th TSRC (3862). Usually, highly reactive free radicals are detected by ESR techniques once stable spin adducts are formed but this may lead to many pitfalls. In 2002, Masselot et al. (27A68) reported a new methodology to study free radicals based on electrospray ionization (ESI) and MS. The concentration of free radicals in MSS smoke is too low, compared to the total concentration of MSS, to allow for their identification by molecular ion identification alone. Stable spin adducts of free radicals from samples of MSS were analyzed by ESI-MS/MS and the resulting fragmentation spectra were used to determine the nature of the free radicals trapped in MSS. With this methodology, Masselot et al. successfully identified two free radicals in the cigarette smoke, the OH˙ and the CH3˙ radicals, and were able to tentatively identify the O2˙- radical. When coupled to LC techniques, the ESI-MS/MS analyses allowed not only for radical identification, but also for their quantification. Masselot et al. applied their new method to characterize and optimize a new filter, based on rosemary extracts, which efficiently scavenged free radicals in cigarette smoke and had been patented by Emami in 1999. The relative efficiency in the removal of the various free radicals present in cigarette smoke (C-centered, O-centered) were discussed. In 2002, Anderson et al. presented a review on the importance of previous work conducted on free radicals in cigarette smoke at the 56th TSRC (74). Ingebrethsen and Lyman (27A48) examined the mechanism proposed by Cueto and Pryor (27A21) and Pryor and Stone (27A93a) for the formation of reactive free-radical species from NO and NO2 in the vapor phase of cigarette MSS in 2002. Inspection of the generic reaction scheme proposed by Cueto and Pryor (27A21) and Pryor and Stone (27A93a) suggested that some condensable materials were likely to result. The possibility of particle formation and growth due to this condensable material suggested only one route for phase transformation in filtered smoke. From a practical perspective, those working with cigarette smoke have long been aware that totally filtered smoke can yield condensable deposits in smoking machine plumbing even in the absence of temperature gradients. Ingebrethsen and Lyman reported that aerosol particle formation and growth were observed in aging, initially particle-free vapors obtained from filtered cigarette MSS. The time scale of particle formation and growth was on the order of minutes and was highly dependent on cigarette tobacco type. Measurements by both ensemble and single particle light-scattering methods were consistent with scattering from an aerosol with a fixed number of particles that grew into the tenth micron range. The rate of particle size increase agreed best with that predicted for growth controlled by condensable species formation by vapor-phase reaction slower than the diffusion rate of the reaction products. A simple reaction scheme involving NO oxidation and reaction with isoprene reproduced the observed form of the particle growth curves but did not yield a consistent reaction rate constant for the various cigarette tobacco types. Their
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1247
11/24/08 2:38:19 PM
1248
results were inconsistent with the proposed mechanisms of Cueto and Pryor (27A21) and Pryor and Stone (3000) and suggested that additional reactants are involved in the particle formation. Müeller and Intorp reported on the longer-lived particulate-phase free radicals (quinone, hydroquinone, and semiquinone species) they detected in MSS by ESR directly after extraction of Cambridge filter pads in 2003 (27A76). They also reported on their study of short-lived vapor-phase free radicals (alkoxy and alkyl species) in MSS. These radicals were spin trapped with α-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) and detected by ESR. No specific identification of the free radicals was reported. In 2003, Baum et al. (27A08) reported on a rigorous set of experimental protocols they believed were necessary to conduct ESR experiments on particulate- and vapor-phase free radicals in MSS. In their paper, they discuss experiments that were conducted in order to determine the optimal conditions for maximum signal intensities and reproducibility of results. Their results showed that radical concentrations in smoke vary among cigarettes in both the vapor phase and particulate phase of MSS. By use of a series of commercial cigarettes, where many parameters change from cigarette to cigarette, no statistically significant correlations were found between radical levels and total particulate matter in smoke. However, a weak correlation was found between the vaporphase free radical levels and total particulate matter levels in smoke. They also reported that there may also be a complex effect of tobacco type on radical levels in smoke. Emami et al. presented a paper at the 2003 CORESTA meeting in Freiburg, Germany, on an improved method for the detection, quantification, and identification of vaporphase free radicals in MSS (27A32). They commented that the detection and quantification of vapor-phase free radicals by ESR has two main limitations: (1) free radical/spin-trap adducts are readily oxidized to give nonradical species, which cannot be detected by ESR; and (2) ESR techniques have a low capability to give structural information in the case of mixtures. Consequently, the unequivocal identification of many free radicals in cigarette smoke is still to be determined and in addition, quantitative results for comparison studies are difficult to obtain (27A08). Masselot et al. (27A68, 27A69) had previously reported on use of 4,5,5trimethylpyrroline-N-oxide for characterizing O-centered radicals and of 3-amino-2,2,5,5 tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy for C-centered radicals. These two free radical trapping agents were used to identify the hydroxyl (OH˙) and methoxyl (CH3O˙) radicals and cyano (CN˙) radical, respectively. In this report, they described the quantitation of these radicals employing a hyphenated LC-MS/MS technique with a C18 reverse-phase column fitted to a triple quadrupole MS instrument. The addition of a stable free radical as internal standard (TEMPO, 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperinodyloxy) allowed them to cleanly quantify the detected free radicals by the socalled MRM (multi-reaction monitoring) mode. The absolute quantification they obtained (ca. 1016 radicals per cigarette) was in good agreement with previous experiments based on
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
ESR techniques. They applied their improved free-radical method to characterize a new filter, patented by Emami in 1999, containing rosemary extracts, which scavenge free radicals in cigarette smoke (27A34). The relative efficiency in the removal of the various free radicals present in cigarette smoke (C-centered, O-centered) was 50% for filters containing 50 mg of formulated rosemary extract. Numerous presentations on free radicals were made in 2004 at the 58th TSRC and at the CORESTA Congress in Kyoto, Japan. In 2004, Zhou et al. (27A123) presented a systematic approach to the study of these free radicals in the particulate phase of MSS at both the CORESTA Congress and at the 58th TSRC (4415). They reviewed much of the prior research on detection methods for free radicals, discussed means to reduce free radical in MSS, and the need for more biomedical evaluation. In 2004, Rolando et al. (27A100) reported on the identification and quantitation of the hydroxyl (OH˙), methoxyl (CH3O˙), cyano (CN˙), formyl (HC(O)O˙), peroxyl (˙OOH), and nitrite (NO2˙) free radicals employing their previously reported hyphenated LC-MS/MS technique that used a C18 reverse-phase column fitted to a triple quadrupole instrument at the CORESTA Congress in Kyoto. Little et al. presented results of their investigation of phenolic particulate-phase free radicals (e.g., benzoquinonehydroquinone radical) in MSS measured by direct ESR measurements at low temperatures (2379) at the 58th TSRC. Variable temperature ESR studies were performed on the particulate-phase free radicals in MSS. Different particulatephase free radicals showed temperature dependence. Isolated particulate-phase free radicals began to form at about 450°C. It should be noted that stable benzoquinone-hydroquinone complexes (CAS No. 106-34-3) had been identified in tobacco smoke and Cytrel® smoke in 1969 by Green et al. (1378) and by Newell et al. (2767) in 1974. In neither study was any special procedure used to deal with free radicals. At the 58th TSRC, Rickert et al. reported on an ESR method used at LabStat for the determination of the yields of vaporphase and particulate-phase free radicals generated in MSS (3134). No specific identified free radicals were discussed. In 2004 at the 58th TSRC, Johnson and Chapman presented a general review on the identification of free radicals in whole smoke (1957). Again, no specifically identified free radicals were discussed. Johnson reported at the 59th TSRC, in 2005, on the results of the identification of spin-trapped vapor-phase free radicals in MSS via an ESI-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry analysis method. Four alkoxyl free radicals were unequivocally identified (˙OC2H5, ˙OC3H7, ˙OC4H9, and ˙OC5H11). The superoxide free radical was also tentatively identified (27A56). Employing an Amplex Red assay, Yan et al. (27A121) were able to detect, quantify, and positively identify H2O2 in whole cigarette smoke. Although not a free radical, H2O2 has been proposed as an intermediate in certain free radical reactions. Church and Pryor (746) proposed that
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1248
11/24/08 2:38:19 PM
Free Radicals
hydroquinones present in the particulate phase of MSS can reduce dioxygen (O2) to produce superoxide (O2 –˙) and semiquinone (Q –˙) radical anions. The superoxide radical anion was thought to be the immediate precursor to H2O2, which could then be reduced to the hydroxyl radical by metals such as iron. Church and Pryor (746) suggested that the resulting HO˙ radical can then damage DNA. Yan et al. found that there was a time dependency of H2O2 production in whole cigarette smoke in their experiments. The Amplex Red assay showed an increase in the production of H2O2 of up to 120 min and then reached a plateau thereafter; suggesting H2O2 was formed over this time period by some reaction(s) involving the highly complex mixture of chemical constituents present in whole cigarette smoke. In the work of Yan et al., concentrations of 3 to 8 µM H2O2 were found in aqueous solutions of whole-smoke bubbled samples, while there was negligible H2O2 formation from vapor-phase bubbled samples. The data in this work suggest that the major constituents responsible for H2O2 formation are in the particulate phase. Aqueous solutions of hydroquinone and catechol, both of which are particulate-phase constituents of cigarette smoke, generated no H2O2 even though they are free radical precursors involved in the production of reactive oxygen species in the smoke matrix. In 2005, Chouchane et al. (27A18) studied cigarettes that had varied levels of polyphenols in the tobacco filler (flue-cured, burley, Oriental tobacco, and blends of these tobaccos). They found that the yield of particulate-phase free radicals generated in the MSS from these cigarettes was not directly related to the total amount of polyphenolic compounds in the tobacco leaf filler. For example, cigarettes prepared from flue-cured tobacco, which contains a significantly higher amount of polyphenols in comparison to burley tobacco, did not generate a higher yield of particulate-phase free radicals in MSS compared to cigarettes prepared with burley tobacco. Halliwell and Poulson recently published a book on cigarette smoke and oxidative stress (27A42). The currently proposed mechanisms for free radical production in cigarette smoke were discussed. They concluded that the proposed mechanisms by which cigarette smoke causes or contributes to inflammatory diseases like COPD, cardiovascular disease, and cancer remain unclear. In several chapters in their book, they discussed recent developments in cellular signaling and suggested that cigarette smoke may cause oxidative stress in cellular systems. The assessment, consequences, and possible modulation of biological effects from oxidative stress were discussed. Analytical methods for the determination of isolated free radicals and biological assays for free radicals were also discussed. In 2006, Rolando et al. (27A99) developed a new methodology based on liquid chromatography (LC), mass spectrometry (LC-MS and LC-MS/MS) for the identification and quantification of free-radical–spin-trap adducts. The improved method involved the use of a nano-LC fitted with a 75-µmcolumn for separation that allowed for shorter analysis time and higher sensitivity. The main advantage of
1249
their improved method was its ability to detect and identify certain free radical adducts (so-called ESR silent adducts) which had been oxidized or reduced after the trapping. By using spin traps that were specific for the trapping of C- or O-centered free radicals, they unambiguously identified the OH˙ and CH3˙ radicals. Using this new methodology, they were able to ascertain the presence and identification of the cyanide radical (CN˙) and nitrite (ONO˙) radical. They stated that they were continuing their work on the structure of more complex free radicals at higher molecular mass by comparing spectra from chemically generated free radicals to those present in MSS. Free radicals in cigarette smoke have attracted a great deal of attention because they are hypothesized to be responsible in part for several of the pathologies related to smoking. Hydroquinone, catechol, and their methyl-substituted derivatives are abundant in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke, and they are known precursors of semiquinone radicals. In the study by Chouchane et al. (27A17) in 2006, the in vitro cytotoxicity of these dihydroxybenzenes was determined with the neutral red uptake (NRU) assay, and their radicalforming capacity was determined by ESR. All of the dihydroxybenzenes studied were found to generate appreciable amounts of semiquinone radicals when dissolved in the cell culture medium employed in the NRU assay. Hydroquinone exhibited by far the highest capacity to form semiquinone radicals at physiological pH, even though it was not the most cytotoxic dihydroxybenzene. Methyl-substituted dihydroxybenzenes were found to be more cytotoxic than either hydroquinone or catechol. The formation of semiquinone radicals via autooxidation of the dihydroxybenzenes was found to be dependent on the reduction potential of the corresponding quinone/semiquinone radical redox couple. The capacity to generate semiquinone radicals was found to be insufficient to explain the variance in the cytotoxicity among the dihydroxybenzenes in their study; consequently, other possible mechanisms of toxicity must also be involved. The observed interactions between 2,6-dimethylhydroquinone and hydroquinone in the cytotoxicity assay and ESR analysis suggested that care needs to be taken when studying the bioactivity of cigarette smoke constituents, that is, the effect of the whole cigarette smoke complex matrix on the activity of the single constituent studied must be taken into consideration. Biological studies of the separated particulate and vapor phases of MSS may provide results that are different from those of studies of whole MSS. In 2006, Culcasi et al. (27A22) also reported on the free radical-related cytotoxicity of the vapor phase of MSS and the paradoxical temporary inhibition of cytotoxicity of vapor-phase free radicals by the MSS particulate phase. In their ESR studies, the spin trap 5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DEPMPO) was employed. They experimented with cigarettes made with cellulose acetate filters, empty cavity filters, and cavity filters containing carbon (charcoal). In their study, filters containing carbon were effective in reducing vapor-phase free radical formation, cytotoxicity, and lipid peroxidation in three cell lines. The
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1249
11/24/08 2:38:19 PM
1250
results of their experiments also showed that NO and NO2 are more important than hydroxide free radicals in generating the cytotoxicity of vapor-phase MSS free radicals generated from MSS constituents. Culcasi et al. also suggested that something in the MSS TPM reduced the cytotoxicity of vapor-phase free radicals in MSS as there was an unexpected protective effect of TPM on the cytotoxicity of whole smoke compared to that of vapor phase of MSS alone. They concluded that the conventional smoke collection method (separation of the smoke into vapor and particulate phases) distorts the true picture of free radical activity. In other words, free radical activity in cigarette smoke should only be evaluated on a “whole smoke” basis. In 2007, Dellinger et al. (27A27) conducted and reported on the formation and stability of resonance stabilized free radicals of the type hypothesized by Pryor and his associates in the particulate phase of MSS. They concluded that the commonly observed free radicals in the particulate phase of MSS were not a surface associated semiquinone and were more likely an intrinsic, polymeric radical with a delocalized electron. The EPR signal observed by Pryor in the alcohol extract of the particulate phase of MSS may be from an extracted and autooxidized hydroquinone, not a particulatephase-associated semiquinone radical. The semiquinone radical was observed in the particulate-phase MSS collected below 400°C and has a five-line spectrum with g ~ 2.006. Semiquinone radicals were formed in the particulate phase of MSS only after aging. Ghosh et al. in 2007 (27A39) presented their research results on the ESR study of free radicals in the vapor phase of the MSS from 2R4F reference cigarettes. The vapor phase of MSS trapped with DMPO contained a mixture of three free radical species that correspond to two oxygen-centered radicals (90%), and an unidentified radical (10%) resulting from the decomposition of the spin adducts. They were able to identify the methoxy free radical in the vapor phase of MSS via computer simulation. The oxygen-centered free radical concentration in the vapor phase of MSS was in the range of 1014 to 1015 spins per cigarette smoked under ISO standard smoking conditions. In 2007, Bartalis et al. (27A05) identified seven acyl and eleven alkylaminocarbonyl radicals in whole MSS employing HPLC and high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of stable radical adducts. The combined abundance of these free radicals measured in fresh whole smoke from a single 2R4F cigarette was approximately 225 nmol (1.4 × 1017 radicals). The fiberglass Cambridge filter pad conventionally employed to separate the vapor phase from the particulate phase of MSS was found to reduce the apparent yield of these radicals, introducing artifacts of measurement. They stated that the long-accepted steady-state mechanism for the formation of C-centered radicals in cigarette smoke involving NO2 chemistry cannot account for these newly identified radicals, and does not in general appear to be a major source of C-centered radicals in fresh cigarette MSS. Consequently, they suggested that the precise nature of radicals in cigarette smoke warrants reexamination.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
XXVII.E Proposed Mechanisms for the Generation of Free Radicals in MSS Smoking has been implicated in numerous diseases (4012, 27A50, 27A51, 27A83, 27A87). Over the last fifty to sixty years, extensive research has been conducted to understand relationships between individual smoke constituents and smoking-related diseases. Because cigarette smoke is a complex mixture and a great number of complex biological processes are involved in each disease, no simple correlations have been found between smoking and disease. This is not to say that we have not progressed in our understanding of the biological effects of smoking and disease but causal relationships are still largely unknown (27A17). Numerous constituents of cigarette smoke have been identified as potential agents of biological damage, including tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines, PAHs, phenolic compounds, and free radicals (746, 1727, 2999, 3712). Free radicals in tobacco smoke have attracted much attention during the last thirty years. Free radicals in biological systems can cause DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and protein oxidation [Baskin and Salem (27A07), Halliwell and Gutteridge (27A41)] if not moderated by the body’s oxidative stress defenses. Cigarette smoke and other environmental pollutants contain free radicals (2999, 2999a). Although free radicals in tobacco smoke have been implicated in human disease, no unequivocal proof of their harm has been established. Tobacco smoke is a complex mixture containing thousands of chemical constituents that can readily produce free radicals in aqueous media (828a, 2999). Tobacco smoke also contains an even greater concentration of antioxidants, antimutagens, and anticancer agents that have been shown to effectively inhibit several biological processes that could lead to disease. In Chapter 26 on carcinogens, cocarcinogens, anticarcinogens, and antimutagens, this subject is reviewed. Nevertheless, there are still many unanswered questions concerning the involvement of free radicals in the toxicology of tobacco smoke. In-depth studies are needed to delineate their precise effects (27A17). In 1958, Lyons et al. (2429) first observed free radicals by electron spin resonance (ESR) in whole cigarette smoke that was condensed at liquid oxygen temperature. These workers reported that whole cigarette smoke contains two populations of free radicals, an unstable population that can only be observed at -183°C and that vanishes when the condensate is warmed to 60°C, and a persistent, stable population that exists for “several days” at room temperature. The unstable population of free radicals included those in the vapor phase of whole cigarette smoke and the more stable population of free radicals included those found in the particulate phase of whole smoke. As a result, the early examination of the chemical and physical characteristics of free radicals in tobacco smoke was conducted mainly on free radicals in the particulate phase. In 1969, Tully et al. (27A115) were the first to publish a study of the free radicals in the vapor phase of cigarette MSS that was condensed at liquid oxygen temperature.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1250
11/24/08 2:38:20 PM
Free Radicals
By passing whole cigarette smoke through a fiberglass filter, called a Cambridge pad, the particulate phase of cigarette smoke can be efficiently separated from the vapor-phase constituents (172, 1067). The use of Cambridge pads allowed investigators to separate and independently investigate the free radicals in both phases of whole smoke. The chemical behaviors of the vapor- and particulate-phase free radicals of MSS smoke were found to be quite distinct. The vapor-phase radicals have been shown to be unstable and very reactive, whereas the radicals in the particulate phase are much longer lived (2999, 2999a, 27A95). Derivative methods or spin-trapping techniques were developed to stabilize the vapor-phase free radicals for quantitation. From about the mid-1960s, chemical and biological research on free radicals in tobacco smoke involved separation of the smoke stream into vapor and particulate phases. From 1976 through 2006, Pryor and his associates studied both vapor- and particulate-phase free radicals in tobacco smoke (746, 828a, 2999, 2999a, 3000, 3001, 27A19, 27A21, 27A24, 27A84-27A95, 27A106, 27A111, 27A122). They generated experimental evidence that suggested possible mechanisms for the initiation, propagation, and termination of free radicals in tobacco smoke. They also alleged that free radicals in MSS were important to numerous smoking-related diseases. They hypothesized that vapor-phase free radicals in tobacco smoke were formed by a continuous mechanism, whereby NO reacted with molecular oxygen in air to form NO2, and subsequent reactions between NO2 and unsaturated molecules in cigarette smoke, for example, isoprene and butadiene, yielded alkyl, peroxyl, and alkoxy radicals. They contended that the reaction of peroxyl radicals with NO generated additional NO2, creating a steady-state cycle (2999a, 27A94). Pryor and his associates also postulated a mechanism for the generation and reaction of free radicals in the particulate phase of tobacco smoke. In that mechanism, particulate-phase free radicals in MSS were postulated to be semiquinone radicals in a polymeric matrix (2999). They stated that the particulate phase of MSS contained numerous dihydroxybenzenes, which could generate semiquinone radicals (27A122). They supported their hypothesis by showing that hydroquinone and catechol can undergo oxidation in air to form semiquinone radicals and ultimately quinones. They further showed under laboratory conditions that reactions between the semiquinone free radicals and molecular oxygen, either in aqueous extracts of cigarette tar (ACT) or in living cells, could lead to the creation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide radical, H2O2, and hydroxyl radical (27A122). It is important to note that the measurements of Pryor et al. (27A93) and others performing research on free radicals in tobacco smoke are not representative of free radical formation under physiological conditions or in biological systems (27A17). The free radical mechanisms proposed by Pryor and his associates were very convincing but, like all mechanisms, as scientific curiosity is piqued, they were vigorously tested by others. In 2001, Blakley et al. (27A11) showed that the yield of particulate-phase free radicals was not correlated with the yield
1251
of hydroquinone in MSS. For a series of cigarettes containing different tobacco blends with variable yields of MSS hydroquinone, the amount of free radicals in the particulate phase of MSS remained unchanged. In their experiments, methylene chloride was used to extract the particulate matter from Cambridge pads, the solvent evaporated, and the residue redissolved in benzene for EPR measurements. Under these experimental conditions, hydroquinone would be less likely to undergo autooxidation, which is less favorable in organic solvents. Nevertheless, significant levels of particulate-phase free radicals were observed, which calls into question the exact nature of the radicals that could be involved in biological damage. Ingebrethsen and Lyman in 2002 conducted experiments on particle formation and growth in vapors from totally filtered cigarette MSS (27A48). In their experiments, they tested a simple reaction scheme involving nitrogen oxide oxidation and its reaction with isoprene. Their experiments reproduced the expected and observed form of the particle growth curves and did not yield a consistent reaction rate constant for the various cigarette tobacco types. Their results were inconsistent with the proposed vapor-phase free radical mechanisms of Cueto and Pryor (27A21) and Pryor and Stone (3000) and suggested that additional reactants are involved in the particle formation. Cytotoxicity is regarded as a potential step in several chronic disease processes, including carcinogenesis and emphysema [Butterworth et al. (27A16)]. The cytotoxic constituents of cigarette smoke and their mechanisms of action are poorly understood [Chouchane et al. (27A17)]. Thus far, most research has focused either on the chemistry of cigarette smoke or on the in vitro and in vivo effects of cigarette smoke on biological systems. The lack of a bridge between these two approaches has made it difficult to assess the relationship between cigarette smoke constituents and their effects in biological systems. It is known, for example, that cigarette smoke contains a substantial amount of dihydroxybenzenes in the particulate phase of MSS (2681, 3175, 3743). In vitro assays have demonstrated that ACT, which contains significant amounts of hydroquinone, catechol, and other mono- and dihydroxybenzenes, can damage DNA [Pryor et al. (27A93)]. However, there is no direct evidence to suggest that pure hydroquinone or catechol can induce the same level of free-radical formation and DNA damage as any isolated fraction of ACT [Chouchane et al. (27A17)]. Again, it must be repeated that the experimental conditions employed by Pryor and others for measurement of free radical activity in tobacco smoke are not representative of free radical formation under physiological conditions or in biological systems (27A17). In 2006, Culcasi et al. (27A22) suggested that something in the MSS particulate phase reduced the cytotoxicity of MSS vapor-phase free radicals as there was an unexpected protective effect of particulate phase on the cytotoxicity of whole smoke compared to that of vapor phase of MSS alone. They concluded that the conventional smoke collection method, that is, separation of the smoke into vapor and particulate phases, distorted the true picture of free radical activity. In other words, free radical activity in cigarette smoke should
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1251
11/24/08 2:38:20 PM
1252
only be evaluated on a “whole smoke” basis, unlike much of the research that had been conducted previously. Therefore, a reexamination of some of the toxicological data on free radicals would be prudent. Chouchane et al. (27A17) recently studied the involvement of semiquinone radicals in the in vitro cytotoxicity of cigarette MSS. Prior to their study it was known that dihydroxybenzenes can generate semiquinone radicals, quinones, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in oxygenated physiological media in vitro, for example, in the growth media used in cytotoxicity assays. It was believed that certain dihydroxybenzenes could possibly generate similar semiquinone radicals, quinones, and ROS in vivo in the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs of smokers. Brunmark and Cadenas (27A15) suggested that the cytotoxicity of quinols and quinones may be due to the concerted action of several processes that include redox cycling, alteration of thiols balance through oxidation or arylation, inhibition of cellular functions, alteration of Ca2+ homeostasis, and covalent binding to nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. It is difficult to extrapolate in vitro data analysis to an in vivo system, especially if the in vitro experiments were not conducted under conditions close to physiological conditions. Moreover, few data are available on the cytotoxicity of pure dihydroxybenzenes to compare with the toxicity of a complex mixture containing dihydroxybenzenes, such as cigarette smoke. The dihydroxybenzenes in their study were constituents of the particulate phase of MSS and were found to exhibit significant cytotoxicity. The methyl-substituted dihydroxybenzenes were shown to have higher cytotoxicity than the unsubstituted compounds. The dihydroxybenzenes were shown to generate semiquinone radicals in the medium used in the NRU cytotoxicity assay. Nevertheless, a correlation between the abundance of semiquinone radicals formed and their cytotoxicity was not found. The observed interaction between 2,6-dimethylhydroquinone and hydroquinone in the cytotoxicity assay and EPR analysis demonstrates that the EC50 values in binary mixtures of the dihydroxybenzenes cannot, in general, be assumed to be additive. Consequently, the interpretation of the bioactivity of cigarette smoke evaluated by similar methods should consider the possible effects of the complex mixture of MSS on the activities of the individual constituents. The most recent study of free radicals in tobacco smoke, published by Bartalis et al. (27A05), indicated that the analysis of whole smoke vs. vapor-phase and/or particulate-phase samples is not only important but absolutely necessary in evaluating the true chemistry of free radicals in tobacco smoke. Bartalis et al. measured and identified seven acyl and eleven alkylaminocarbonyl radicals in fresh whole smoke from a single 2R4F cigarette. These eighteen free radicals had a spin concentration of 1.4 × 1017 radicals/cigarette and accounted for nearly the entire ESR signal. They showed that the longaccepted steady-state mechanism for the formation of carboncentered radicals in cigarette smoke involving NO2 chemistry cannot account for these newly identified radicals, and that it does not in general appear to be a major source of carboncentered radicals in fresh cigarette MSS. The fiberglass
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Cambridge filter pad conventionally employed to separate the vapor phase from MSS was found to reduce the yield of these radicals, introduced artifacts of measurement. The introduction of a Cambridge pad reduced the yield of the eighteen free radicals measured and identified by 96%. In their experimental procedure that did not use Cambridge pads or any spin traps, no NO2 was detected in the smoke. [This finding parallels that of Cooper and Hege (816), who reported that, even under unfavorable conditions, the nitrogen oxides in cigarette MSS are predominantly NO]. NO2 formation was shown to be an artifact of the smoke separation procedure. Bartalis et al. found no evidence of any type of free radicals containing a NO2 group as previously proposed by Pryor and his associates (746, 2999, 27A88, 27A89) and Flicker and Green (27A37, 27A38). The proposed mechanism of the addition of NO2 to dienes in cigarette smoke, cigarette pyrolysates, or model gas mixtures of NO, air, and isoprene was found to have no merit. The long-accepted steady-state mechanism for the formation of carbon-centered radicals in cigarette smoke involving NO2 chemistry cannot account for these newly identified radicals; consequently, they suggested that the precise nature of radicals in cigarette smoke warrants a total reexamination. Bartalis et al. stated: The widely accepted mechanism for the formation of both alkyl and alkoxyl radicals in cigarette was proposed by Pryor and co-workers and supported by persuasive, but primarily indirect, evidence was based on comparisons of gas-phase cigarette smoke and model gas mixtures.
Based on the work of Blakley et al. (27A11), Ingebrethsen and Lyman (27A48), Chouchane et al. (27A17, 27A18), Culcasi et al. (27A22), and Bartalis et al. (27A05), the proposed mechanisms of Pryor and his associates certainly need to be reexamined. Additionally, the previously made biological assertions need to be reevaluated since the free radicals presumably present in MSS may not actually exist. The clear evidence of artifacts formed by the separation of whole smoke into particulate and vapor phases supports the total reexamination of the chemistry and biology of free radicals in tobacco smoke proposed by Bartalis et al. (27A05). In summary, it would appear that we have come full circle over the last fifty years. Lyons et al. (2429) initially examined free radicals in whole smoke without the use of Cambridge pads and today this appears to be the collection method of choice. Tremendous analytical advancements have occurred over the last fifty years and now the identification and quantification of free radicals in whole tobacco smoke are finally possible. Artifact formation is always possible in research and is not a weakness of the experimenter. As additional research continues on free radicals in tobacco smoke, we express the same concerns and hopes of Ishiguru and Sugawara (1884) in 1980: It is hoped that further progress will be made in this field so that the formation routes of many smoke components can be understood and the composition of smoke components can be better controlled. Table XXVII-1 is a catalog of free radicals identified to date in tobacco and tobacco smoke. The catalog contains
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1252
11/24/08 2:38:20 PM
1253
Free Radicals
Table XXVII-1 Free Radicals in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke 7DEOH;;9,,)UHHUDGLFDOVLQWREDFFRWREDFFRVPRNHDQGWREDFFRVXEVWLWXWHVPRNH &$61R
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFRVPRNH
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
7REDFFR
7REDFFR VXEVWLWXWH VPRNH
5DGLFDOVIUHH>*(1(5$/',6&866,21@
$F\OUDGLFDOEXW\O^LVRPHUV` &2&+&+&+&+
$
$
$F\OUDGLFDOHWK\O &2&+&+
$
$
$F\OUDGLFDOPHWK\O &2&+
$
$
$F\OUDGLFDOSURS\O^LVRPHUV` &2&+&+&+
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOEXW\O^LVRPHUV` &21+&+&+&+&+
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOHWK\O &21+&+&+
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOPHWK\O &21+&+
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOSHQW\O^LVRPHUV` &21+&+&+&+&+&+
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOSURS\O^LVRPHUV` &21+&+&+&+
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOXQVDWXUDWHG &+12
$
$
$ON\ODPLQRFDUERQ\OUDGLFDOXQVDWXUDWHG &+12
$
$
R%HQ]RVHPLTXLQRQHUDGLFDO
$
S%HQ]RVHPLTXLQRQHUDGLFDO
$
%XWDGLHQHUDGLFDO
$
%XWDGLHQHPHWK\OUDGLFDO ^LVRSUHQHUDGLFDO`
$
%XWR[\OUDGLFDO 2&+
$
WHUW%XWR[\OUDGLFDO
$
&\DQLGHUDGLFDO &1
DF F ED DD DEFD D $$$$ $$$$ $$$$
$$$
(Continued )
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1253
11/24/08 2:38:21 PM
1254
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVII-1 (continued) Free Radicals in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke &$61R
7REDFFRVPRNH
1DPHSHU&$&ROOHFWLYH,QGH[
&\DQLGHUDGLFDO^DFU\ORQLWULOHUDGLFDO` &+1
&\DQLGHUDGLFDO &+1
5HIHUHQFHV
7REDFFR
7REDFFR VXEVWLWXWH VPRNH
$
$
(WKR[\OUDGLFDO 2&+&+
$
)RUP\OUDGLFDO +&2 2
$
+\GURJHQSHUR[LGH
+\GURJHQSHUR[\OUDGLFDO 22+
$
+\GURTXLQRQHVHPLTXLQRQHTXLQRQHIUHH UDGLFDO
$
+\GUR[LGHIUHHUDGLFDO
D$$$$
0HWKR[\UDGLFDO &+2
$
0HWK\OUDGLFDO &+
$$$$
1LWULWHUDGLFDO 21 2
$$
D ED DE D D D
D
D
D $
D
D
1LWURJHQR[LGH 12
^QLWULFR[LGH`
2[\JHQGLUDGLFDO
3HQWR[\OUDGLFDO2&&+
$
3URSR[\OUDGLFDO2&+
$
$
6XSHUR[LGHDQLRQUDGLFDO
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1254
11/24/08 2:38:22 PM
Free Radicals
only thirty-five entries, including a general entry labeled Radicals, free. The vast majority of the entries in the table are tobacco smoke components, except for NO and oxygen that are also found in tobacco. Hydrogen peroxide was added for completeness since it was discussed several times in the chapter. It is anticipated that with the new analytical methods
1255
recently demonstrated by Bartalis et al. (27A05), Masselot et al. (27A68), and Rolando et al. (27A99, 27A100) that many additional free radicals in tobacco smoke will soon be identified. It should be kept in mind that, in light of the recent discovery by Bartalis et al. (27A05), some of the previously identified free radicals in tobacco smoke may be artifacts.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C027.indd 1255
11/24/08 2:38:22 PM
28
Summary
The following initial comments were presented in greater detail in the Foreword. Since the mid-1950s, the combined referenced cataloging of the chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke may have been conducted in-house at various U.S. and foreign tobacco companies, as well as by various governmental agencies, but none has been published since the 1968 review by R.L. Stedman of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (3797). Prior to that, there were only a few such publications, one in 1959 [Johnstone and Plimmer (1971)] and one in 1963 [Philip Morris, Inc. (2939)]. In subsequent years, several tobacco and tobacco smoke publications dealt with specific types of components, for example, the 1977 review by Schmeltz and Hoffmann on the nitrogen-containing components in tobacco and tobacco smoke (3491). Several catalogs of the chemical components of only tobacco smoke have been published, but the most recent one was that of Ishiguro and Sugawara (1884) in 1980. Since the 1968 article by Stedman, the number of identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components has increased sevenfold to almost 8600. No other commercial product has been so completely defined. This catalog is our attempt to categorize with references the identified and reported components in tobacco and tobacco smoke as of 2007. Hundreds of scientific articles (many of them referenced in this text) have stated that tobacco and tobacco smoke are complex mixtures. This is an accurate statement. But some have alluded to or emphasized that they are primarily complex, that is, these mixtures of chemicals are just too multifarious, too difficult to completely understand, or so complicated and/or convoluted that the normal individual could not possible comprehend the totality of the concept or composition of the mixture. This was never the intent of the definition of a complex mixture, but nevertheless, some have implied that this multifaceted conglomeration of chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke is too difficult to explain and understand. The tobacco industry has often stated that tobacco and tobacco smoke are complex mixtures, without providing a basis for the statement. This text illustrates the complexity of tobacco and tobacco smoke. It provides the reader with an historical perspective on the identification of thousands of chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke, it contains reviews of all known and identified classes of chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke, and it provides thousands of accessible references on identified chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Also provided in the preceding pages are references and discussions of one of the major problems with a complex mixture, that is, the extrapolation of a biological property found in experimental studies with an individual compound in the mixture to the property of that component in a mixture which may contain
components that either enhance or offset the experimentally observed biological property of the component. Even though tobacco and tobacco smoke are complex mixtures, they are not incomprehensible. Tobacco and tobacco smoke are among the most extensively studied complex mixtures. There are literally millions of protein fragments being cataloged as part of the tobacco genome projects. Over 30,000 enzymes are known to participate in plant growth and regulation. Oxidation, reduction, additions, hydrogenation, pyrolysis, decarboxylation, and dehydration are but a few of the many chemical reactions known to be involved in tobacco pyrolysis and combustion. These reactions are capable of producing hundreds of thousands of reaction products. The limiting factor in the discovery and identification of additional chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke was the early analytical technology but this was changed significantly over the years by the development of new and ever-improved analytical technologies. Since the 1954 listing of fewer than a hundred tobacco smoke components by Kosak (2170), various investigators have estimated from gas chromatographic scans that for each component identified in tobacco smoke there are five to twenty components present at extremely low per cigarette yields that have not yet been identified. Thus, as noted by Wakeham (4103) in 1971 when the identified tobacco smoke components numbered about 1350: Gas chromatographic scans indicate there are many more, probably over ten thousand, possibly even a hundred thousand [tobacco smoke components].
Grob (1422), one of the pioneers of the use of glass capillary gas chromatography in tobacco smoke composition studies, as well as other tobacco smoke investigators, also noted that the number of peaks, each of which represented at least one component, in the chromatographic scans far exceeded the number of identified components. If it were not for scientists’ curiosity and the tremendous advances in analytical chemistry over the last fifty to sixty years, the need for this up-to-date catalog of compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke would not be critical. As analytical technology advances, surely thousands of new chemical components in tobacco and tobacco smoke will be added to the listings found in this text. In each chapter of this text, one or more tabulations were made that contained the distribution of the components (by chemical class) that were identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, or in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. Table XXVIII-1 illustrates the total distribution of chemical components distributed between tobacco and tobacco smoke. 1257
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C028.indd 1257
11/24/08 1:40:12 PM
1258
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Table XXVIII-1 Distribution of Chemical Components between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component
Table
Totala
Smoke
Tobacco
Smoke and Tobacco
Hydrocarbons Alkanes Alkenes and alkynes Alicyclics Monocyclic aromatic Polycyclic aromatic
Table I.A-10 Table I.B-1 Table I.C-1 Table I.D-1 Table I.E-6
132 363 142 98 586a
111 347 95 89 575a
96 42 61 39 86
75 25 16 30 74
1321
1217
324
220
1462 111 263 1090 745 103 1030 304 20 279 558 48 992
531 44 143 656 354 30 617 162 13 35 444 33 506
1152 102 199 647 614 102 924 201 13 271 244 21 659
221 35 79 213 223 29 511 59 6 27 130 6 173
7005
3568
5149
1712
141 469 212 79 67 73
131 259 118 59 53 55
23 316 127 39 51 19
13 106 33 19 37 1
1041
675
575
209
Table XVII.A-1
5
1
5
1
Table XVII.A-3
321
256
117
52
Table XVII.A-5
14
1
14
1
Table XVII.B-1
538
440
221
123
Table XVII.B-3
95
54
62
21
Table XVII.B-5
76
64
31
19
Table XVII.C-1 Table XVII.D-1 Table XVII.E-6 Table XVII.E-8 Table XVII.F-8
118 56 294 76 9
97 14 286 24 9
35 44 23 55 0
14 2 15 3 0
1602
1246
607
251
260 242 35 146 125
119 169 33 116 22
178 131 22 142 112
37 58 20 112 9
Sub-Totals Oxygen-Containing Components Alcohols Phytosterols and derivatives Aldehydes Ketones Carboxylic acids Amino acids Esters Lactones Anhydrides Carbohydrates Phenols Quinones Ethers
b
Table II.A-5 Table II.B-2 Table III-12 Table III-13 Table IV.A-3 Table IV.B-7 Table V-3 Table VI-2 Table VII-1 Table VIII-3 Table IX.A-22 Table IX.B-2 Table X-2
Sub-Totals Nitrogen-Containing Components Nitriles Amines Amides Imides N-Nitrosamines Nitroalkanes, nitroarenes, and nitrophenols b
Table XI-2 Table XII-2 Table XIII-1 Table XIV-1 Table XV-8 Table XVI-1
Sub-Totals Nitrogen Heterocyclic Components Monocyclic 4-membered N-containing ring compounds Monocyclic 5-membered N-containing ring compounds Compounds with multiple monocyclic 5-membered N-containing ring Monocyclic 6-membered N-containing ring compounds Compounds with a 6-membered N-containing ring and a second 5-membered N-containing ring Compounds with two or more 6-membered N-containing rings Lactams Oxazoles Aza-arenes Aza-arene derivatives c N-Heterocyclic amines Sub-Totals Miscellaneous Components Sulfur-containing Halogen-containing Fixed gases Metal, nonmetals Ions, etc.
Table XVIII.A-1 Table XVIII.B-3 Table XIX-5 Table XX-5 Table XX-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C028.indd 1258
11/24/08 1:40:12 PM
1259
Summary
Table XXVIII-1 (Continued) Distribution of Chemical Components between Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke Component Pesticides Enzymes Anticarcinogens Free radicals
Table Table XXI-3 Table XXII-2 Table XXVI-7C Table XXVII-1
Total a
Smoke
Tobacco
303 499 56 34
102 1 55 34
299 499 49 2
Smoke and Tobacco 98 1 48 2
Sub-Totals
1700
651
1434
385
Grand Total
12669
7357
8089
2777
a b
c
This number includes the various isomers of alkyl-PAHs reported in which the position of the alkyl group or groups has not been precisely defined. Polyfunctional O-containing compounds are counted in each functional group, e.g., propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy- {lactic acid} appears in the alcohol catalog and the acid catalog; benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- {vanillic acid} appears in the acid catalog, the phenol catalog, and the ether catalog. The number of aza-arene derivatives does not include the nine N-heterocyclic amines.
There are twenty-seven chapters in the book (excluding this Summary). Table XXVIII-1 contains summary data on the distribution of chemicals discussed in all but three chapters (Chapter 23, on “Hoffmann Analytes,” Chapter 24, on Tobacco and/or Tobacco Smoke Components Used as Tobacco Ingredients, and Chapter 25, on Pyrolysis). The tobacco and tobacco smoke components discussed in Chapters 23, 24, and 25 are all previously covered in the remaining chapters of the book. Table XXVIII-1 is divided into five sections: Hydrocarbons (Tables in Chapter 1), Oxygen-containing components (Tables in Chapters 2 to 10), Nitrogen-containing components (Tables in Chapters 11 to 16), Nitrogen Heterocyclic components (Tables in Chapter 17), and Miscellaneous components (Tables in Chapters 18, 19 to 22, 26, and 27). Below each section in Table XXVIII-1 is a subtotal of the total of identified chemical components found in tobacco, tobacco smoke, or both tobacco and tobacco smoke. As previously mentioned throughout the text, a great number of the individual identified components found in tobacco and/or tobacco smoke are multifunctional. Many contain two or more functionalities and for that reason they are located in multiple chapters. The Alphabetical Index to Components Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke that follows the Reference section contains 8590 components. The Index contains 8398 individually identified components and several isomers. Each component is tabulated to indicate its identification in smoke, tobacco, or both. The total number of isomers noted in the Index is 292, but 100 of them are accounted for in the 8398 listed components. Thus, the number of identified or partially identified components in tobacco and tobacco
smoke listed in the Index totals 8590 (8398 + 292 - 100). The total number of chemical components listed in Table XXVIII-1 is 12669. There are 8089 found in tobacco, 7357 found in tobacco smoke, and 2777 found in both tobacco and smoke. The difference between 12669 and 8590 indicates that indeed many of the chemical components of tobacco and smoke are multifunctional and as such are listed in several chapters. The oxygen-containing components (Tables in Chapters 2 to 10) account for the largest number of compounds found in tobacco and tobacco smoke, that is, 7005. These components are distributed: 5149 in tobacco and 3568 in tobacco smoke, with 1712 found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The compounds in Chapters 18 to 22, 26, and 27, listed under miscellaneous components, number 1700. There are 1434 components identified in tobacco, 651 components identified in tobacco smoke, and 385 found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The nitrogen heterocyclic components (Tables in Chapter 17) represent the next largest class of compounds, with 1602 components identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. In this section there are 607 components identified in tobacco, 1246 components identified in tobacco smoke, and 251 found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The hydrocarbons (Tables in Chapter 1) represent the next class of compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. This section of Table XXVIII-1 contains 1321 compounds. There are 324 hydrocarbons identified in tobacco, 1217 hydrocarbons identified in tobacco smoke, and 220 found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. The nitrogen-containing components (Tables in Chapters 11 to 16) are the smallest and last group of compounds identified in tobacco and tobacco smoke. This group of compounds numbers 1041. There are 575 nitrogen-containing
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C028.indd 1259
11/24/08 1:40:12 PM
1260
components identified in tobacco, 675 identified in tobacco smoke, and 209 found in both tobacco and tobacco smoke. In closing, the authors hope that this text will serve a useful purpose. The content of the book represents over fifty years of effort by the researchers attempting to build a framework about our understanding of the complex mixtures of tobacco and tobacco smoke. Much progress has been made during the last fifty years in terms of understanding of tobacco and tobacco smoke. During that time, the number of identified components in tobacco and tobacco smoke has increased nearly sevenfold. This progress has been due, in large part, to the great strides that have been made in analytical technology, but more than that, these scientists have shown great
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
perseverance in the face of uncertainty and controversy surrounding the roles of tobacco and tobacco smoke and health. Great works are performed, not by strength, but by perseverance. (Samuel Johnson, ca. 1740)
We hope that present and future scientists will persevere and use the information contained herein to answer new questions by looking back to history. If you want to understand today, you have to search yesterday. (Pearl Buck, 1892–1973)
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C028.indd 1260
11/24/08 1:40:12 PM
Bibliography NOTE: Every one of the following references that include an electronic reference was accessed and found to be functional during the period August 24–26, 2007. 1. Aasen, A.J., S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 35. Two isomeric 5,6-epoxy-3-hydroxy-7megastigmen-9-ones from Nicotiana tabacum L.; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 366. 2. Aasen, A.J., C.R. Enzell, and T. Chuman: (6S)-3-Methyl6-isopropyl-9-oxo-2E,4E-decadienoic acid from Turkish Nicotiana tabacum L. Assignment of absolute configuration; Agr. Biol. Chem. 39 (1975) 2085–2089. 3. Aasen, A.J., J.R. Hlubucek, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: CORESTA 1974 Symp., CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1974 Spec. Edition: p. 142. 4. Aasen, A.J., J.R. Hlubucek, S.O. Almqvist, B. Kimland, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 20. Structures and syntheses of three new tobacco constituents of probable isoprenoid origin; Acta Chem. Scand. B27 (1973) 2405–2410. 5. Aasen, A.J., J.R. Hlubucek, and C.R. Enzell: New tobacco constituents originating from terpenoid precursors; 9th Internat. Symp. Chem. Natural Products, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (1974). 6. Aasen, A.J., J.R. Hlubucek, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 24. (9R)-9-Hydroxy-4-megastigmen-3-one, a new tobacco constituent; Acta Chem. Scand. B28 (1974) 285–288. 7. Aasen, A.J., J.R. Hlubucek, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 27. The structures of four stereoisomeric 8,12-epoxylabd-14-en-13-ols isolated from Greek Nicotiana tabacum L.; Acta Chem. Scand. B29 (1975) 589–592. 8. Aasen, A.J., J.R. Hlubucek, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 29. 7(S)-10-Oxo-4-methyl-7-isopropyl-5E-undecenolide, a new thunbergan-type norisoprenoid isolated from Greek Nicotiana tabacum L.; Acta Chem. Scand. B29 (1975) 677–681. 9. Aasen, A.J., N. Junker, C.R. Enzell, J.E. Berg, and A.-M. Pilotti: Tobacco chemistry. 36. Absolute configuration of tobacco thunberganoids; Tetrahedron Lett. 30 (1975) 2607–2610. 9a. Aasen, A.J., B. Kimland, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 9. 5-Methoxy-6,7-dimethylbenzofuran, a new tobacco constituent; Acta Chem. Scand. B25 (1971) 3182–3184. 10. Aasen, A.J., B. Kimland, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 18. Absolute configuration of (9R)-9-hydroxy-4, 7E-megastigmadien-3-one (3-oxo-A-ionol); Acta Chem. Scand. B27 (1973) 2104–2114. 11. Aasen, A.J., B. Kimland, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 13. 8,13-Epoxylabd-14-en-12-one and 8,13B-epoxylabd-14-one. Two new diterpenoids from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B26 (1972) 832–834. 11a. Aasen, A.J., B. Kimland, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 15. New tobacco constituents. The structure of five isomeric megastigmatrienones; Acta Chem. Scand. B26 (1972) 2573–2576.
11b. Aasen. A.J., T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, and M. Devreux: Tobacco chemistry. 37. The absolute configuration of prenylsolanone, (9S)-6,12-dimethyl-9-isopropyltrideca5E,lOE,12-trien-2-one. A northunberganoid of Nicotiana tabacum L.; Acta Chem. Scand. B30 (1976) 178–179. 12. Aasen. A.J., A. Pilotti, C.R. Enzell, J.-E. Berg, and A.-M. Pilotti: Tobacco chemistry. 31. (1S,4S,8R,11S,12R)-8, 12-epoxy-(2E,6E)-thunbergadiene-4,11-diol, a new constituent of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B30 (1976) 999–1000. 13. Aasen, A.J., C.H.G. Vogt, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 28. Structure and synthesis of drim-8-en-7one, a new tobacco constituent; Acta Chem. Scand. B29 (1975) 51–55. 14. Abdoh, Y.: La composition de la fumée des cigarettes Iraniennes [The composition of the smoke from Iranian cigarettes]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Sci. Tob. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 499–500. 15. Abedinzadeh, Z. and I. Bayat: Determination of bromine residues in Iranian tobacco by neutron activation analysis; J. Radiol. Chem. 25 (1976) 217–222. 16. Abedinzadeh, Z. and B. Parsa: Determination of trace elements in Iranian cigarette tobacco by neutron activation analysis; J. Radiol. Chem. 14 (1973) 139–145. 17. Abedinzadeh, Z., M. Razeghi, and B. Parsa: Neutron activation analysis of an Iranian cigarette and its smoke; J. Radiol. Chem. 35 (1977) 373–376. 18. Abeles, M. and L. Paschkis: Contribution to the knowledge of tobacco smoke; Arch. Hyg. 14 (1892) 209–215. 18a. Adam, T., T. Ferge, S. Mitsche, T. Streibel, R.R. Baker, and R. Zimmerman: Discrimination of three tobacco types (Burley, Virginia, Oriental) by pyrolysis singlephoton ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and advanced statistical methods; Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 381 (2005) 487–499. 18b. Adams, J., E.L. Atlas, and C.S. Giam: Ultratrace determination of vapor-phase nitrogen heterocyclic bases in ambient air; Anal. Chem. 54 (1982) 1515–1518. 19. Adams, J.D. and K.D. Brunnemann: Analysis of tobaccospecific nitrosamines in sidestream tobacco smoke; in: Environmental carcinogens. 9. Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 81 (1988) 231–238. 20. Adams, J.D., K.D. Brunnemann, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Biogenesis and chemistry of alkaloid-derived N-nitrosamines; 184th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Paper No. 66 (1982). 21. Adams, J.D., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Determination of nitric oxide in unaged smoke by GSCTEA; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 36, 1978, p. 19. 1261
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1261
11/24/08 2:39:26 PM
1262
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
22. Adams, J.D., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXXV. Rapid method for the analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines by gasliquid chromatography with a thermal energy analyzer; J. Chromatography 256 (1983) 347–351. 23. Adams, J.D., A. Castonguay, S.J. Lee, N. Vinchkoski, and D. Hoffmann: Formation and transfer of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)butanone (NNK) during smoking; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 49, 1981, p. 26. 24. Adams, J.D., E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Pharmacokinetics of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in Fischer rats; Carcinogenesis 6 (1985) 509–512. 25. Adams, J.D., E.J. LaVoie, M. O’Donnell, and D. Hoffmann: Pharmacokinetics of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relationship to human cancer; edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 779–796. 26. Adams, J.D., E.J. LaVoie, K.J. O’Mara-Adams, D. Hoffmann, K. Dee Carey, and M.V. Marshall: Pharmacokinetics of N’-nitrosonornicotine and 4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in laboratory animals; Cancer Lett. 28 (1985) 195–201. 27. Adams, J.D., E.J. LaVoie, A. Shigematsu, P. Owens, and D. Hoffmann: Quinoline and methylquinolines in cigarette smoke: Comparative data and the effect of filtration; J. Anal. Toxicol. 7 (1985) 293–296. 28. Adams, J.D., S.J. Lee, and D. Hoffmann: Carcinogenic agents in cigarette smoke and the influence of nitrate on their formation; Carcinogenesis 5 (1984) 221–223. 29. Adams, J.D., S.J. Lee, N. Vinchkoski, A. Castonguay, and D. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXXIII]. On the formation of the tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone during smoking; Cancer Lett. 17 (1983) 339–346. 30. Adams, J.D., K.J. O’Mara-Adams, and D. Hoffmann: On the mainstream-sidestream distribution of smoke components from commercial cigarettes; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 34 (1985), p. 18. 31. Adams, J.D., K.J. O’Mara-Adams, and D. Hoffmann; Toxic and carcinogenic agents in undiluted mainstream smoke and sidestream smoke of different types of cigarettes; Carcinogenesis 8 (1987) 729–731. 32. Adams, J.D., P. Owens-Tucciarone, and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco carcinogenesis and asbestos fibers: A model study. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 25 (1984) 102. 33. Adams, J.D., P. Owens-Tucciarone, and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in dry snuff; Food Chem. Toxicol. 25 (1987) 245–246. 34. Adams, J.D., J.J. Piade, and D. Hoffmann: The selective reduction of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines from cigarette smoke; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 50, 1980, p. 26. 35. Adams, J.D., A. Shigematsu, P. Owens, E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Quinolines and methylquinolines in the mainstream smoke of commercial cigarettes; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 38, 1982, p. 21. 36. Adams, J.D., P.L. Tucciarone, L. Grenoble, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: On the analysis of
37.
38.
38a.
39.
39a.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45. 46.
47. 48.
49.
50.
51.
N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke by capillary GC-TEA; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 48, 1986. p. 26. Adler, R., R.L. Peck, and L. Thompson: Chemistry of cigar butt odor; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 20, 1970, p. 12. Adler, R., R.L. Peck, and L. Thompson: Chemistry of cigar butt odor. II. Further investigations on the distillable portions; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 121–123. Aeschbacher, H.U. and H.P. Würzner: An evaluation of instant and regular coffee in the Ames mutagenicity test; Toxicol. Lett. 5 (1980)139–145. Ahlmann, J.: Detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette tar; Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 43 (1958) 379–390. Akin, F.J. and W.J. Chamberlain: Inhibition of tumor promotion by a neutral fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 52 (1974) 613–615. Akin, F.J., M.E. Snook, R.F. Severson, W.J. Chamberlain, and D.B. Walters: Identification of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke and their importance as tumorigens; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 5 (1976) 191–195. Aksu, S. and S. Enercan: A new apparatus and method to determine nicotine and total tar in tobacco smoke; Inhisarlar Enstituleri Raporlati 7 (1958) 202–209. Aksu, S. and S. Enercan: The amounts of nicotine and tar in the smoke of cigarettes made from blended and some individual Turkish tobaccos; Inhisarlar Enstituleri Raporlati 7 (1958) 210–215. Aldridge, G.R.: Basic components of cigarette smoke; Ph.D. Thesis, New York University, New York, NY (1958) pp. 1–70; see Dissertation Abstr. 20 (1960) 3065. Alexander, A.J., P.L. Goggin, and M.A. Cooke: A Fourier-transform infrared spectrophotometric study of the pyrosynthesis of nickel tetracarbonyl and iron pentacarbonyl by combustion of tobacco; Anal. Chim. Acta 151 (1983) 1–12. VOID Alexandrov, K.: Arsenic content of tobacco of Bulgarian cigarettes; Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 14 (1961) 539–542; The arsenic content of Bulgarian cigarettes; Suvr. Med. (Sofia), 12(2) (1961) 105–108. Alexandrov, K.: The arsenic content of Bulgarian cigarettes; Voprosy Onkol. 8 (1962) 48–50. Alexandrov, K., P. Simova, and I. Savatinova: Potentiale kanzerogene Substanzen in Zigarettenrauch. Befund 3,4Benzpyren [Potential carcinogenic substances in cigarette smoke. 3,4-Benzpyrene found]; Neoplasma 8 (1961) 575–576. Allen, R.E.: A rapid method for the determination of polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 46, 1976, p. 32. Allen, R.E. and D.G. Vickroy: The characterization of the smoke from Cytrel® smoking products and its comparison to smoke from flue-cured tobacco. III. Particulate phase analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 430–437. Allen, T.E. and A.J. Manson: The analysis of 3-methylvaleric acid in tobacco by HPLC; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 9, 1994, p. 28.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1262
11/24/08 2:39:26 PM
1263
Bibliography
52. Almqvist, S.O., A.J. Aasen, J.R. Hlubucek, B. Kimland, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 23. Structures and syntheses of four new norisoprenoid furans from Greek Nicotiana tabacum L.; Acta Chem. Scand. B28 (1974) 528–532. 53. Almqvist, S.O., G. Anderson, E. Bergstedt, C.R. Enzell, and N. Junker: On the transfer of tobacco components and pyrolysis products to the smoke stream; CORESTA 1978 Symposium, Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1978 Spec. Edition: Paper ST02, 125–126. 53a. Altschul, S.F., T.L. Madden, A.A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D.J. Lipman: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs; Nucleic Acids Res. 25 (1997) 3389–3402. 54. Alvarado, J. and A.R. Cristiano: Determination of cadmium, cobalt, iron, nickel, and lead in Venezuelan cigarettes by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 8 (1993) 253–259. 55. Alvord, E.T. and S.Z. Cardon: Separation and identification of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 24, 1955, p. 13. 56. Alvord, E.T. and S.Z. Cardon: Inhibition of the formation of 3,4-benzpyrene from cigarette paper smoke; Ann. Mtg., Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Atlanta, GA (1955). 57. Alvord, E.T. and S.Z. Cardon: The inhibition of the formation of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 498–503. 57a. Ames, B.N. and B.L. Horecker: The biosynthesis of histidine: Imidazoleacetol phosphate transaminase; J. Biol. Chem. 220 (1956) 113–128. 58. Amin, A.N., W.W. Weeks, and R.C. Long: Chemistry and metabolism of the essential oil of tobacco during fluecuring. I. Lipids and aromatic constituents; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 42, 1979, p. 23. 59. Amin, S., D. Desai, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Synthesis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and their metabolites and results of related assays; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 26 (1996) 139–147. 60. Anastasov, A., P. Rusev, and P. Petrova: Gas chromatographic determination of higher fatty acids in some Bulgarian cigarettes and their smoke; Bulg. Tyutyun 20 (1975) 27–33. 61. Andersen, R.A., H.R. Burton, P.D. Fleming, and T.R. Hamilton-Kemp: Effect of storage conditions on nitrosated, acylated, and oxidized pyridine alkaloid derivatives in smokeless tobacco products; Cancer Res. 49 (1989) 5895–5900. 62. Andersen, R.A., H.R. Burton, P.D. Fleming, T.R. Hamilton-Kemp, and S.L. Gay: Effects of an air-curing environment on alkaloid derived nitrosamines in burley tobacco; in: N-Nitroso compounds to human cancer: Exposures and mechanisms, edited by H. Bartsch, I.K. O’Neill, and R. Schulte-Hermann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 84 (1987) 451–455. 63. Andersen, R.A., P.D. Fleming, and H.R. Burton: N-Acyl and N’-nitroso alkaloids in burley tobacco lines; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 52, 1987, p. 39. 64. Andersen, R.A., P.D. Fleming, H.R. Burton, T.R. Hamilton-Kemp, D.F. Hildebrand, and T.G Sutton:
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
Levels of alkaloids and their derivatives in air-cured and fire-cured KY171 dark tobacco during prolonged storage: Effects of temperature and moisture; Tob. Sci. 34 (1990) 50–56. Andersen, R.A., P.D. Fleming, H.R. Burton, T.R. Hamilton-Kemp, and T.G. Sutton: N-Acyl and N-nitrosopyridine alkaloids in alkaloid lines of burley tobacco during growth and air-curing; J. Agr. Food Chem. 37 (1989) 44–50. Andersen, R.A., T.R. Hamilton-Kemp, and P.D. Fleming: Volatile compounds from burley tobacco stalks; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 7, 1984, p. 4. Andersen, R.A. and M.J. Kasperbauer: Post-harvest treatment and the accumulation of nitrite and N’-nitrosonornicotine in burley tobacco; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 877–884. Andersen, R.A., M.J. Kasperbauer, H.R. Burton, J.L. Hamilton, and E.E. Yoder: Changes in chemical composition of homogenized leaf-cured and air-cured tobacco stored in controlled environments; J. Agr. Food Chem. 30 (1982) 663–668. Andersen, R.A., M.J. Kasperbauer, R.H. Lowe, and J.H. Smiley: Comparison of carbonyls and nitrogenous compounds during bulk versus air curing of burley tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., 173rd Natl. Mtg., New Orleans, LA (1977) 184–216. Andersen, R.A. and T.R. Kemp: Accumulation of 4-(Nmethyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in alkaloid genotypes of burley tobacco during postharvest processing: Comparisons with N’-nitrosonornicotine and probable nitrosamine precursors; Cancer Res. 45 (1985) 5287–5293. Andersen, R.A. and C.C. Litton: Variation of carbohydrate, phenolic, and alkaloid contents in different parts of air-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 64–65. Andersen, R.A. and J.R. Todd: Estimation of tobacco plant phenols by their bonding to polyvinylpyrrolidone; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 107–111. Anderson, G.M., M.L. Alexander, and R.B. Westerberg: Vapor phase analysis of mainstream tobacco smoke by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS); 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 8, 2003, p. 22. Anderson, I.G.M., R.R. Baker, S.L. Baum, C.C. Rowlands, and D.M. Murphy: Free radicals in cigarette smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Lexington, KY, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 75, 2002, p. 66. Anderson, I.G.M. and V. Hennighan: The comparative determination of Amadori compounds in tobacco using high performance liquid chromatography with post column derivatization; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 66, 1996, p. 60. Anderson, L.M., S.S. Hecht, R.M. Kovatch, S. Amin, D. Hoffmann, and J.M. Rice: Tumorigenicity of the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1263
11/24/08 2:39:26 PM
1264
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
83a. 84.
85. 85a.
86.
87.
88.
89.
tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-methylnitrosamino-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in infant mice; Cancer Lett. 5: (1991) 177–181. Anderson, R.C., D.M. Gunn, J. Murray-Rust, P. MurrayRust, and J.S. Roberts: Vetispirane sesquiterpene glucosides from flue-cured tobacco: Structure, absolute stereochemistry, and synthesis. X-ray structure of the p-bromosulphonate of one of the derived aglycones; Chem. Comm. (1977) 27–28. Andervont, B.H.: Pulmonary tumors in mice. IV. Lung tumor induced by subcutaneous injection of 1,2,5,6-dibenzanthracene in different media and its direct contact with lung tissue; Publ. Hlth. Repts. 52 (1937) 1584–1589. Andervont, B.H. and M.B. Shimkin: Biological testing of carcinogens. II. Pulmonary tumor induction technique; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1 (1940) 225–239. Andrews, M.N.: A survey of literature regarding hydrogen cyanide, its occurrence in and removal from cigarette smoke and removal from industrial waste; RDR, 1970, No. 38, July 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501000933 -0946. Andrews, M.N.: The use of Cu(II)-amidoxime starch for the removal of hydrogen cyanide from cigarette smoke; RDR, 1970, No. 44, October 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001098 -1114. Andrews, M.N. and J.H. Reynolds IV: Tobacco additives for reduction of carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide and oxides of nitrogen in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1971, No. 17, August 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514902044 -2055. Andrews, M.N. and J.H. Reynolds IV: Project 1203: Selective filtration of gas phase of smoke; RDR, 1971, No. 21, September 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514902909 -2944. Anonymous: Another look at 3,4-benzopyrene; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 3 (1965) 335–348, see pp. 335–338. Appleton, R.A., C.R. Enzell, and B. Kimland: Tobacco chemistry. 3: Unsaturated hydrocarbon constituents of Greek tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 266–274. Araki, S. and T. Katoh: Analysis of air pollutants by gas chromatography; Bunseki Kagaku 11 (1962) 533–543. Armitage, A.K., M. Dixon, B.E. Frost, D.C. Mariner, and N.M. Sinclair: The effect of tobacco blend additives on the retention of nicotine and solanesol in the human respiratory tract and on subsequent plasma nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17 (2004) 537–544. Armitage, A.K., M. Dixon, B.E. Frost, D.C. Mariner, and N.M. Sinclair: The effect of inhalation volume and breathhold duration on the retention of nicotine and solanesol in the human respiratory tract and on subsequent plasma nicotine concentrations during cigarette smoking; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 240–249. Armitage, A.K., C.T. Dollery, T.H. Houseman, E.M. Kohner, P.J. Lewis, and D.M. Turner: Absorption of nicotine by man during cigar smoking; Brit. J. Pharm. 59 (1977) 493. Armitage, A.K., C.T. Dollery, T.H. Houseman, E.M. Kohner, P.J. Lewis, and D.M. Turner: Absorption of nicotine from small cigars; Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 23 (1978) 143–150. Armitage, A.K. and D.M. Turner: Absorption of nicotine in cigarette and cigar smoke through oral mucosa; Nature 226 (1970) 1231–1233.
90. Armstrong, H.E. and E.V. Evans: Carbonic oxide in tobacco smoke; Brit. Med. J. 1922(i) 992–993. 90a. Arnarp, J., J. Bielawski, B.M. Dahlin, O. Dahlman, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 2. Alkyl- and alkenyl-substituted guaiacols found in cigarette smoke condensate; Acta Chem. Scand. B43 (1989) 44–50. 90b. Arnarp, J., J. Bielawski, B.M. Dahlin, O. Dahlman, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 5. Alkylsubstituted 3-hydroxy-4-pyrones found in cigarette smoke condensate; Acta Chem. Scand. B44 (1990) 963–967. 91. Arnarp, J., J. Bielawski, B.M. Dahlin, O. Dahlman, C.R. Enzell, and T. Pettersson: Cyclic A-diketones found in cigarette smoke condensate; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 65, 1990, p. 45. 91a. Arnarp, J., S. Broman, B.M. Dahlin, O. Dahlman, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 7. Alkyl- and alkenyl-substituted phenols found in cigarette smoke condensate; Acta Chem. Scand. B45 (1991) 529–533. 91b. Arnarp, J., B.M. Dahlin, C.R. Enzell, and T. Pettersson: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 3. Aromatic acids of cigarette smoke condensate; Acta Chem. Scand. B43 (1989) 381–385. 91c. Arnarp, J., B.M. Dahlin, C.R. Enzell, T. Pettersson, and G. Weidermann: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 6. Alkyl- and alkenyl-substituted 2-hydroxy-2-cyclohexenones found in cigarette smoke condensate; Acta Chem. Scand. B45 (1991) 105–107. 92. Arnarp, J., C.R. Enzell, K. Petersson, and J. Petersson: Identification and mass spectra of some alkylated 2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-ones in cigarette smoke condensate; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 38, 1986, p.21. 93. Arnarp, J., C.R. Enzell, K. Petersson, and J. Petersson: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 1. A chemical and mass spectrometric study of tobacco smoke. Alkyl 2-hydroxy-2-cyclopentenones; Acta Chem. Scand. B40 (1986) 839–854. 94. Arnarp, J., T. Pettersson, N. Junker, and C.R. Enzell: Chemical studies on the semi-volatile weakly acidic fraction from cigarette smoke condensate; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1984 Spec. Edition: Paper S17, 56. 94a. Arndt, R., I. Wahlberg, and C. Enzell; Four new cembranoids from tobacco; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 25, 1989, p. 26. 95. Arostegui, G.E. and A. Navarrete: Tabaco y cancer. V. Contenido de alquitran y nicotina de las cuatro marcas de cigarillos Cubanos de mayor consume [Tobacco and cancer. V. Tar and nicotine content of the major consumed Cuban cigarillos]; Bol. Liga Contra Cancer 34 (1959) 120–122. 96. Arostegui, G.E. and A. Navarrete: Tabaco y cancer. VI. Estudio del contenido de alquitran y nicotina en los cigarillos de las marcas mas fumada en Cuba [Tobacco and cancer. VI. Study of the content of tar and nicotine from the cigarillos most smoked in Cuba]; Bol. Liga Contra Cancer 34 (1959) 122–124. 97. Arrendale, R.F., W.J. Chamberlain, and O.T. Chortyk: The quantitation of N-nitrosamines from tobacco using capillary GC/single ion monitoring (SIM)/mass spectrometry; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 11, 1982, p. 6.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1264
11/24/08 2:39:27 PM
Bibliography
98. Arrendale, R.F., W.J. Chamberlain, and O.T. Chortyk: Quantitation of tobacco specific N-nitrosamines using cold on-column injection capillary GC/selected ion monitoring (SIM)/mass spectrometry; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 7, 1983, p. 4. 99. Arrendale, R.F., W.J. Chamberlain, O.T. Chortyk, J.L. Baker, and M.G. Stephenson: Determination of tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines by capillary gas chromatography/ selected ion monitoring mass spectrometry; Anal. Chem. 58 (1986) 565–568. 100. Arrendale, R.F., R.F. Severson, and O.T. Chortyk: The application of capillary gas chromatography to the analyses of tobacco leaf, smoke, and pyrolyzate compounds; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 14, 1980, p. 8. 101. Arrendale, R.F., R.F. Severson, and O.T. Chortyk: The application of capillary gas chromatography to the analyses of acidic constituents of tobacco leaf and smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 186–197. 102. Arrendale, R.F., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, and M.E. Snook: Analyses of mono- and dihydroxybenzenes in tobacco smoke and pyrolyzates by glass capillary gas chromatography; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 20 (1982) 136–143. 103. Arrendale, R.F., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, and M.G. Stevenson: Isolation and identification of the wax esters from the cuticular waxes of green tobacco leaf; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 8, 1984, p. 5; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1988) 67–84. 104. Arrendale, R.F., R.F. Severson, and M.E. Snook: Quantitative determination of naphthalenes in tobacco smoke by gas chromatography; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 100–105; Correction of error in Quantitative determination of naphthalenes in tobacco smoke by gas chromatography; [Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 100– 105]. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 55. 105. Artho, A., J. Bonnet, R. Koch, and J.-C. Plantefève: Retention of cigarette smoke constituents as influenced by type of tobacco blend and filtering material; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 82, 1972, pp. 122–123. 106. Artho, A.J. and K. Grob: Distribution of nicotine between the vapour and particulate phases of cigarette smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 10, 1963, p. 10. 107. Artho, A.J. and K. Grob: Nikotinabsorption aus dem Cigarettenrauch [Nicotine absorption from cigarette smoke]; Z. Präventivmed. 9 (1964) 14–25. 108. Artho, A.J.and K. Grob: Determination of pH of cigarette smoke; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. 56 (1965) 270–273. 109. Artho, A.J. and K. Grob: Investigations into the determination of the pH value of cigarette smoke; Tabak J. Internat. 1 (1971) 31–33. 110. Artho, A.J. and R. Koch: Über die Bestimmung von Cyanwasserstoff im Cigarettenrauch [On the determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1964) 58–63. 111. Artho, A.J. and R. Koch: Über den Gehalt des Cigarettenrauches an Acrolein und Cyanwassersdtoff [On the content of acrolein and hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke]; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. 60 (1969) 379–388.
1265
112. Artho, A.J. and R. Koch: Characteristics of the olfactory properties of cigarette smoke components; Anal. Tabac (SEITA) (1973) 37–43. 113. Ash, M.: The radioactivity of the stalk of tobacco plants grown in London, England in 1957; Med. Serv. J. Canada 15 (1959) 195–198; Is tobacco smoke radioactive? Royal Soc. Hlth. J. 80 (1960) 22. 114. Ashburn, J.G.: The production of a sterol-free cigarette; CIM, 1954, No. 17, July 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 502476757 -6758. 115. Ashburn, J.G. and M. Senkus: Separation of some aliphatic compounds from tobacco; RDM, 1956, No. 30, October 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503134235 -4244. 116. Ashburn, J.G.: Study of tobacco pretreatments; RDR, 1958, No. 20, December 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504912251 -2337. 117. Ashburn, J.G.: Effect of tobacco treatments on polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1963, No. 11, February 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008831 -8854. 118. VOID 119. Ashburn, J.G.: Addition of sodium glycinate to filter tips. Effect on aldehyde and nicotine content of smoke; RDM, 1963, No. 18, February 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612425 -2427. 120. Ashburn, J.G. and P.H. Latimer Jr: Organic compounds identified in tobacco; RDM, 1958, No. 29, April 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610877 -0926. 121. Ashburn, J.G. and A. Rodgman: Procédé de traitement du tabac [Process for the treatment of tobacco]; French Patent No. 1,206,210 (February 8, 1960). 122. Asmaev, P. G. and P. Popova: Quantity and composition of the solid-liquid phase of tobacco smoke; Izves. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zavendii Pish. Tekhnol. 1961(4) 51–57. 123. Asmus, E., R. Höhne, and J. Kraetsch: Photometrische Bestimmung von Nikotin und Pyridin im Tabakrauch [Photometric determination of nicotine and pyridine in tobacco smoke]; Z. Anal. Chem. 187 (1962) 33–37. 123a. Astrup, P.: Carbon monoxide as a contributor to the health hazards of cigarette smoking; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 75–80. 124. Autio, K.: Determination of ethylenethiourea (ETU) as a volatile N, N’-dimethyl derivative by GLC-MS and GLCNPSD. Applications for determining ETU; Finn. Chem Lett. (1–2) (1983) 10–14. 125. Avetyam, R.M., I.G. Mokhnachev, D.N. Latayeva, and L.F. Maksimova: Effect of mineral fertilizers in soils with varying moisture supply on the volatile phenols in tobacco smoke; Biol. Arm. 21 (1968) 78–83, see Chem. Abstr. 70 (1969) 17626. 126. Aviado, D.M.: Suspected pulmonary carcinogens in environmental tobacco smoke; Environ. Tech. Lett. 9 (1988) 539–544. 126a. Aviado, D.M.: Non-epidemiologic studies on potential carcinogens in environmental tobacco smoke: A critique of the Environmental Protection Agency’s designation of environmental tobacco smoke as a Group A Carcinogen; Document submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency, September 25 (1990). 126b. Aviado, D.M.: Complex mixtures of tobacco smoke and the occupational environment; Chapter 4 in: Patty’s Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 4th Edition, Vol. 2, Pt.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1265
11/24/08 2:39:27 PM
1266
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
126c.
126d. 127.
127a.
128.
129. 130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
137a.
138.
A, edited by G.D. Clayton and F.E. Clayton, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY (1993) 107–148. Aviado, D.M. and T. Watanabe: Functional and biochemical effects on the lung following inhalation of cigarette smoke and constituents. I. High- and low-nicotine cigarettes in mice; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 30 (1974) 185–200. Ayer, H.E. and D.W. Yeager: Irritants in cigarette smoke plumes; Am. J. Publ. Hlth. 72 (1982) 1283–1285. Ayres, C.I. and R.E. Thornton: “Free” and “restricted” smoking; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 17, 1964, pp. 27–29. Ayres, C.I. and R.E. Thornton: The use of a furnace technique for studying the pyrolysis of tobacco; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 17, 1965, p. 27. Ayres, C.I. and R.E. Thornton: Determination of benzo[a] pyrene and related compounds in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 285–290. Ayres, C.W.: Determination of ammonia in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Talanta 16 (1969) 1085–1087. Ayres, S.M., S. Giannelli Jr, and R.G. Armstrong: Carboxyhemoglobin: Hemodynamic and respiratory responses to small concentrations; Science 149 (1965) 193–194. Babey, J.: Les terpenes dans le tabac: Extraction et identification [The terpenes in tobacco. Extraction and identification]; Ph. D. Thesis, Fed. Polytech. Sch., Zurich, Switzerland (1973) pp. 1–49. Babin, J., D. Polic, and B. Neskovic: Detection of carcinogenic substances in wide use. I. The amount of 3,4benzpyrene in the smoke of “Morava” cigarettes; Glasnik 14(4) (1956) 45–52. Bach, B., H. Kuhn, and F. Küffner: Über die Verminderung des Nikotingehalts von Tabaken mittels Äthylenoxydes [Reduction of the nicotine content of tobacco by means of ethylene oxide]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie (1963) 53–60. Bache, C., D. Lisk, G. Goss, D. Hoffmann, and J.D. Adams: Cadmium and nickel in mainstream particulates of cigarettes containing tobacco grown on a low-cadmium soil-sludge mixture; J. Toxicol. Env. Hlth. 16 (1985) 547–552. Bache, C., D. Lisk, G. Goss, D. Hoffmann, and J.D. Adams: Effectiveness of cigarette filter tips for reducing cadmium in relation to other mainstream constituents; Drug Chem. Toxicol. (1985) 189–193. Bache, C., C. Reid, D. Hoffmann, J.D. Adams, and D. Lisk: Cadmium in smoke particulates of regular and filter cigarettes containing low and high cadmium concentrations; Bull. Env. Contam. Toxicol. 36 (1986) 372–375. Bachmann, W.E.: The reaction of alkali metals with polycyclic hydrocarbons: 1,2-Benzanthracene, 1,2,5,6dibenzanthracene and methylcholanthrene; J. Org. Chem. 1 (1937) 347–353. Bachmann, W.E., J.W. Cook, A. Dansi, C.G.M. de Worms, G.A.D. Haslewood, C.L. Hewett, and A.M. Robinson: The production of cancer by pure hydrocarbons - IV; Proc. Royal Soc. B123 (1937) 343–368. Backhurst, J.D. and I.W. Hughes: Use of the smoulder rate of a cigarette for determining the weight of tobacco burned during puffing; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research
139. 139a. 140.
140a.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 16, 1962, p. 11. Badger, G.M.: Chemical constitution and chemical carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 2 (1954) 73–127. Badger, G.M.: The chemical basis of carcinogenic activity; Thomas, Springfield, IL (1962) 16–19. Badger, G.M.: Mode of formation of carcinogens in human environment; in: Symposium: Analysis of carcinogenic air pollutants, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 1–16. Badger, G.M., J.W. Cook, C.L. Hewett, E.L. Kennaway, N.M. Kennaway, R.H. Martin, and A.M. Robinson: The production of cancer with pure hydrocarbons; Proc. Royal Soc. B129: (1940) 439–467. Badger, G.M., J.K. Donnelly, and T.M. Spotswood: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XV. The pyrolysis of 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (“isooctane”); Australian J. Chem. 15 (1962) 605–615. Badger, G.M., J.K. Donnelly, and T.M. Spotswood: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XXIV. The pyrolysis of some tobacco constituents; Australian J. Chem. 18 (1965) 1249–1266. Badger, G.M., J.K. Donnelly, and T.M. Spotswood: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XXVII. The pyrolysis of isoprene; Australian J. Chem. 19 (1966) 1023–1043. Badger, G.M., S.D. Jolad, and T.M. Spotswood: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XX. The pyrolysis of [1–14C]naphthalene; Australian J. Chem. 17 (1964) 771–777; The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures; Australian J. Chem. 19 (1966) 85; Australian J. Chem. 19 (1966) 95. Badger, G.M. and R.W.L. Kimber: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Part VI. The pyrolysis of tetralin; J. Chem. Soc. (1960) 266–270. Badger, G.M. and R.W.L. Kimber: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Part VII. The pyrolysis of indene; J. Chem. Soc. (1960) 2746–2749. Badger, G.M., R.W.L. Kimber, and J. Novotny: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XVI. The pyrolysis of [1–14C]tetralin; Australian J. Chem. 15 (1962) 616–625. Badger, G.M., R.W.L. Kimber, and J. Novotny: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XXI. The pyrolysis of n-butylbenzene over a range of temperatures from 300–900°C at 50°C intervals; Australian J. Chem. 17 (1964) 778–786. Badger, G.M., G.E. Lewis, and I.M. Napier: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. VIII. The pyrolysis of acetylene; J. Chem. Soc. (1960) 2825–2827. Badger, G.M. and J. Novotny: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XIII. The pyrolysis of 3-vinylcyclohexane; J. Chem. Soc. (1961) 3403–3407. Badger, G.M. and J. Novotny: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. XVIII. The pyrolysis of n-decane; Australian J. Chem. 16 (1963) 613–622. Badger, G.M. and T.M. Spotswood: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Part IX. The pyrolysis of toluene, ethylbenzene, propylbenzene, and butylbenzene; J. Chem. Soc. (1960) 4420–4427. Badger, G.M. and T.M. Spotswood, The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Part X. The
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1266
11/24/08 2:39:27 PM
Bibliography
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
158a.
159. 160.
161.
161a.
162.
163. 163a. 164.
165.
166.
167. 168.
pyrolysis of 1-phenylbuta-1,3-diene at 550°C; J. Chem. Soc. (1960) 4427–4431. Badger, G.M. and T.M. Spotswood: The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons at high temperatures. Part XI. The pyrolysis of buta-1,3-diene and buta-1,3-diene with pyrene; J. Chem. Soc. (1960) 4431–4437. Baggett, M.S. and G.P. Morie: Quantitative determination of phenol and alkylphenols in cigarette smoke and their removal by various filters; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 30–32. Baggett, M.S. and G.P. Morie: Selective removal of semivolatile components of cigarette smoke by various filters; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 7, 1974, p. 11; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 150–152. Baggett, M.S., G.P. Morie, M.W. Simmons, and J.S. Lewis: Quantitative determination of semivolatile compounds in cigarette smoke; J. Chromat. 97 (1974) 79–82. Bailey, D.G. and A.I. Schepartz: High molecular weight fractions from cured and fermented cigar-filler tobacco; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 145–148. Bailey, G.S. and D.E. Williams: Potential mechanisms for food-related carcinogens and anticarcinogens: A scientific status summary by the Institute of Food Technologists’ Expert Panel on Food Safety & Nutrition; Food Technol. (February 1993) 105–118. Bailey, E.J., E.L. Kennaway, and M.E. Urquhart: Arsenic content of cigarettes; Brit. J. Cancer 11 (1957) 49–53. Bailey, P.C.: The quantitative determination of some constituents of tobacco smoke; Master’s Thesis, Duke University (1952) pp. 1–40. Bailey, P.C., E. Williams, and M.E. Hobbs: Some organic constituents of cigarette tobacco smoke; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper No. 24, 1954, p. 7. Baker, F., S.R. Ainsworth, J.T. Dye, C. Crammer, M.J. Thun, D. Hoffmann, J.L. Repace, J.E. Henningfield, J. Slade, J. Pinney, T. Shanks, D.M. Burns, G.N. Connolly, and D.R. Shopland: Health risks associated with cigar smoking; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284 (2000) 735–740. Baker, R.R.: The formation of the oxides of carbon by the pyrolysis of tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 16–27; Temperature variation within a cigarette combustion coal during the smoking cycle; High Temp. Sci. 7 (1975) 236–247. Baker, R.R.: The kinetics of tobacco pyrolysis; Thermochim. Acta 17 (1976) 29–63. Baker, R.R.: Gas velocities inside a burning cigarette; Nature 264 (1976) 167–169. Baker, R.R.: Combustion and thermal decomposition regions inside a burning cigarette; Combust. Flame 30 (1977) 21–32. Baker, R.R.: Environmental conditions inside a burning cigarette; in: Analytical calorimetry, edited by R.S. Porter and J.F. Johnson, Plenum Publ. Corp., New York, NY 4 (1977) 193–202. Baker, R.R.: Kinetic mechanisms of the thermal-decomposition of tobacco; Thermochim. Acta 28, N1 (1979) 45–57. Baker, R.R.: Mechanisms of smoke formation and delivery; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 6 (1980) 184–224. Baker, R.R.: Variation of the gas formation regions within a cigarette combustion coal during the smoking cycle; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 1–17.
1267
169. Baker, R.R.: Product formation mechanisms inside a burning cigarette; Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 7 (1981) 135–153. 170. Baker, R.R.: Formation of carbon oxides during tobacco combustion:pyrolysis. Studies in the presence of isotopic gases to elucidate reaction sequence; J. Appl. Anal. Pyrol. 4 (1983) 297–334. 170a. Baker, R.R.: The effect of ventilation on cigarette combustion mechanisms; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 10 (1984) 88–150. 171. Baker, R.R.: The release of nicotine and semi-volatile components inside a burning cigarette; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: Paper ST05, 102–103; Proc. CORESTA 1986 Symp. Vol. II: 522–532. 171a. Baker, R.R.: A review of pyrolysis studies to unravel reaction steps in burning tobacco; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 11 (1987) 555–573. 171b. Baker, R.R.: Some burning problems in tobacco science; in: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Physical and Chemical Processes Occurring in a Burning Cigarette, edited by D.E. Townsend, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC (1987) 1–61. 172. Baker, R.R.: Smoke chemistry; Chapter 12 in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 398–439. 172a. Baker, R.R. and L.J. Bishop (formerly L.J. Willoughby): The pyrolysis of tobacco ingredients; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 71 (2004) 223–311; Baker, R.R. and L.J. Willoughby: The pyrolysis of relatively volatile tobacco ingredients; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, 2002, Vol. 56, Paper No. 73, p. 65. 172b. Baker, R.R. and L.J. Bishop: The pyrolysis of non-volatile tobacco ingredients using a system that simulates cigarette combustion conditions; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 74 (2005) 145–170. 172c. Baker, R.R., S. Coburn, and C. Liu: The pyrolytic formation of formaldehyde from sugars and tobacco; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 33, 2006, p. 36; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 77 (2006) 12–21. 173. Baker, R.R. and R.A. Crellin: The effect of diffusion on the delivery of carbon monoxide from cigarettes; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 15, 1976, p. 16; The diffusion of carbon monoxide out of cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 131–140. 173a. Baker, R. R. and M. Dixon: The retention of tobacco smoke constituents in the human respiratory tract; Inhalation Toxicol. 18 (2006) 255–294. 174. Baker, R.R. and K.D. Kilburn: The distribution of gases within the combustion coal of a cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 79–87. 174a. Baker, R.R., E.D. Massey, and G. Smith: An overview of the effects of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry and toxicity; Food Chem. Toxicol. 42S (2004) S53-S83. 174b. Baker, R.R., J.R. Pereira de Silva, and G. Smith: The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part I. Flavourings and additives; Food Chem. Toxicol. 42S (2004) S3-S37. 174c. Baker, R.R., J.R. Pereira de Silva, and G. Smith: The effect of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry. Part
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1267
11/24/08 2:39:27 PM
1268
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
174d. 174e.
174f.
175.
176.
176a. 177.
178.
179.
179a.
179b.
180.
181.
182.
II. Casing ingredients; Food Chem. Toxicol. 42S (2004) S39-S52. Baker, R.R. and D.P. Robinson: Tobacco combustion The last ten years; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 16 (1990) 3–71. Baker, R.R. and G. Smith: Toxicological aspects of tobacco flavor ingredients; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 29 (2003) 47–76. Balandin, T., C. van der Does, J.-M.B. Albert, J.F. Bol and H. J. M. Linthorst: Structure and induction pattern of a novel proteinase inhibitor class II gene of tobacco; Plant Mol. Biol. 27 (1995) 1197–1204. Balasubrahmanyam, S.N. and L.D. Quin: Thermal degradation of nornicotine; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 17, 1961, p. 9; Pyrolytic degradation of nornicotine and myosmine; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 133–136. Baliga, V. and W.R. Morgan: Ultrastructural changes of tobacco cell walls following sequential extraction; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 17–27. Ball, F.J.: Chemistry of lignin and its applications; APPATappi Res. Conf., Tarrytown, NY (1965). Ball, M., O. Päpke, and A. Lis: Polychlordibenzodioxine und Polychlordibenzofurane in Cigarettenrauch [Polychlorobenzodioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans in cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1990) 393–402. Ballenger, J.J.: Experimental effect of cigarette smoke on human respiratory cilia; New Eng. J. Med. 263 (1960) 832–836; Ballenger, J.J., F.W. Dawson, M.S. DeRuyter, and H.B. Harding: Effect of nicotine on ciliary activity in vitro; Ann. Otol., Rhinol., Laryngol. 74 (1965) 303–311. Banyasz, J.L., S. Li, C.B. Huang, E.A. Lambert, and K.H. Shafer: The effect of lighting devices on benzo[a] pyrene in cigarette smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 27, 2001, pp. 35–36. Bao, M., P. Joza, and M.J. Kaiserman: A method for the determination of heterocyclic aromatic amines in tobacco smoke condensate; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 18, 2005, p. 28. Bao, M., W.S. Rickert, W. Wright, M. Sharifi, A. Trivedi, and M.J. Kaiserman: Yields of heterocyclic aromatic amines in relation to mutagenicity and cigarette blend type; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 66, 2005, p. 55. Bao, M., M. Sharifi, P. Joza, and T. Field: Determination of twenty polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke by automated sample preparation and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 65, 2002, pp. 59–60. Barbezat-Debreuil, S.: Étude, aux rayons X, des paraffines du tabac fractionée par chromatographie [A study with x-rays of tobacco paraffins fractionated by chromatography]; J. Recherche Centre Natl. Sci. Lab. Bellevue (Paris) 45 (1958) 273–277; Compt. Rend. 246 (1958) 2907. Barca, L., P. Altieri, and S.G. Rossi: A preliminary study for extracting from tobacco some groups of compounds which might be precursors of some components, mainly of the neutral smoke fraction, by using supercritical carbon
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
dioxide; CORESTA 1992 Symp., Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1992 Spec. Edition: Paper S3, 177. Barkemeyer, H.: Eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des 3,4-Benzpyrens in Tabakrauchkondensaten [A new method for the determination of 3,4-benzpyrene in tobacco smoke condensate]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 325–328. Barkemeyer, H.: Zur Untersuchung der Gas-DampfPhase des Cigarettenrauches. 1 Mitteilung: Der RotationsAbscheider, ein Gerät zur Absorption von Aerosolen, Dämpfen und Gasen in Flüssigkeiten [Examination of the gas-vapour phase of tobacco smoke. 1. The rotatory trap, an apparatus for the absorption of aerosols, vapours and gases in liquids]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 91–93. Barkemeyer, H.: Detection and determination of dimethylnitrosamine in cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 9, 1969, p. 7. Barkemeyer, H., H. Borowski, R. Schröder, and F. Seehofer: Zur Applikation und Analytik der Dithiocarbamate: Ein Beitrag zur Bekämpfung von Peronospora tabacina Adam mit Dithiocarbamaten [Application and analytical characteristics of dithiocarbamates: A contribution to the application of dithiocarbamates against Peronospora Tabacina Adam]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 385–399. Barkemeyer, H. and F. Seehofer: Zur Spektrophotometrischen Bestimmung des Nicotins in Tabak und Tabakrauchkondensaten [The spectrophotometric determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke condensate]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 112 (1960) 50–52. Barkemeyer, H. and F. Seehofer: A new apparatus for collecting the particulate phase of tobacco smoke in liquids; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 18, 1963, pp. 14–15. Barkemeyer, H. and F. Seehofer: Zur Untersuchung der Gas-Dampf-Phase des Cigarettenrauches. 2. Mitteilung: Zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffmonoxide (NO) aus der Gasphase des Cigarettenrauches [Examination of the gasvapour phase of cigarette smoke. 2. The determination of the nitric oxide (NO) content of the gas phase of cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 278–282. Barkemeyer, H. and F. Seehofer: Determination of p-benzoquinone, hydroquinone and catechol in cigarette smoke in one operation; CORESTA Bull. (1969) 65–66. Barnes, J.M.: Nitrosamines; in: Essays in Toxicology, Vol. 5, edited by W.J. Hayes Jr, Academic Press, New York, NY (1974) 5–15. Barnes, J.M. and P.N. Magee: Some toxic problems of dimethylnitrosamine; Brit. J. Ind. Med. 11 (1954) 167–174. Barney, P.E. Jr, L.P. Bush, and T.C. Tso: Physiologie und Biochemie der Tabakpflanze. 2. Physiologische Störungen: Mineralstoffe [Physiology and biochemistry of the tobacco plant. 2. Physiological malfunctions: Mineral nutrients]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 211–236. Barry, G., J.W. Cook, G.A.D. Haslewood, C.L. Hewett, I. Hieger, and E.L. Kennaway: The production of cancer by pure hydrocarbons. Part III; Proc. Royal Soc. (Biol.) 117 (1935) 318–351.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1268
11/24/08 2:39:28 PM
1269
Bibliography
194a. Barnhardt, W.W.: Moisture determination; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 6, 1948. 195. Barta, L.: Über die Bestimmung des Ammoniaks im Tabakrauch [The determination of ammonia in tobacco smoke]; Angew. Chem. 47 (1934) 215–216. 196. Barta, L. and E. Toole: Über den Nikotin- und Ammoniakgehalt des Cigaretten- Tabakrauches [The nicotine and ammonia content of cigarette tobacco smoke]; Angew. Chem. 45 (1932) 43. 197. Barta, L. and E. Toole: Über den Nikotin- und Ammoniakgehalt des Cigaretten- tabakrauches [The nicotine and ammonia content of cigarette tobacco smoke]; Angew. Chem. 45 (1932) 43. 198. Barta, L. and E. Toole: Über den Nikotin- und Ammoniakgehalt des Cigaretten- Tabakrauches [The nicotine and ammonia content of cigarette tobacco smoke; Angew. Chem. 46 (1932) 671–673. 199. Bartle, K.D., L. Bergstedt, M. Novotny, and G. Widmark: Tobacco chemistry. III. Analysis of the gas phase of tobacco smoke by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; J. Chromat. 45 (1969) 256–263. 200. Bartle, K.D. and M. Novotny: Mass spectral and gas chromatographic evidence for some new components in the gas phase of tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 215–219. 201. Bartsch, H.: Relevance of endogenous N-nitroso compounds in human carcinogenesis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 116 (Suppl. Pt. 2) (1990) 1115. 202. Bartsch, H.: N-Nitroso compounds and human cancer. Where do we stand? in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco smoke, and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France. IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 1–10. 203. Bartsch, H., C. Malaveille, A.M. Camus, G. MartelPlanche, G. Brun, A. Hautefeuille, N. Sabadie, A. Barbin, T. Kuroki, C. Drevon, C. Piccoli, and R. Montesano: Validation and comparative studies on 180 chemicals with S. typhimurium strains and V79 hamster cells in the presence of various metabolizing systems; Mutation Res. 76 (1980) 1–50. 204. Bartsch, H., H. Ohshima, B. Pignatelli, and S. Calmels: Human exposure to endogenous N-nitroso compounds: Quantitative estimates in subjects at high risk for cancer of the oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, and urinary bladder; Cancer Surv. 8 (1989) 335–362. 205. Bartsch, H., H. Ohshima, D.E. Shuker, B. Pignatelli, and S. Calmels: Human exposure to endogenous N-nitroso compounds: Mechanisms of formation and implication in cancer etiology; Bristol-Myers Cancer Symp. 11 (1990) 111–137. 206. Bartsch, H., I.K. O’Neill, M. Castegnaro, and M. Okada (Editors): N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence and biological effects; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982). 207. Baskevitch, N. and G. Ferrer: Modification of the nicotine:tar ratio through the use of reconstituted tobacco; CORESTA 1982 Symp., Winston-Salem, NC, USA, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper ST1, 31. 208. Bass, R.T., L.E. Brown, S.B. Hassam, G.C. Newell Jr, and R.H. Newman: Cigarette smoke transfer studies. Transfer of added (18–14C)octatriacontane; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts,
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
215.
216.
217.
218. 219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
Vol. 41, Paper No. 33. 1987, p. 29; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 289–296. Bates, C., M. Jarvis, and G. Connolly: Tobacco additives: Cigarette engineering and nicotine addiction; July 4, 1999, see http:/www.ash.org.uk/papers/additives. html. Bates, C., A. McNeill, M. Jarvis, and N. Gray: The future of tobacco product regulation and labelling in Europe: Implications for the forthcoming European Union directive; Tobacco Control 8 (1999) 225–235. Bates, W.W., R.B. Griffith, E.S. Harlow, M. Senkus, and H. Wakeham: Determination and reporting of total particulate matter, water in total particulate matter, and nicotine in cigarette smoke; Virginia J. Sci. 18 (1967) 130–135; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 192–196. [Reprinted from Virginia J. Sci. 18 (1967) 130–135]. Bates, W.W., A.R. Mitchem, and J.D. Rogers: Some chemical changes that occur during aging and processing of flue-cured tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob Sci. Inaugural Vol. (1974) 79–85. Battista, S.P.: Ciliatoxic components in cigarette smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, 1975, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76–1221 (1976) 517–534. Battista, S.P.: Inhalation studies of toxicity of tobacco smoke; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 51–62. Bauer, E., Z. Guo, Y.F. Ueng, L.C. Bell, D. Zelldin, and F.P. Guengerich: Oxidation of benzo[a]pyrene by recombinant human cytochrome P450 enzyme; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 8 (1995) 136–142. Baum, E.J.: Occurrence and surveillance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Chapter 2 in: Polycyclic hydrocarbons and cancer. Vol. I, edited by H.V. Gelboin and P.O. Ts’o, Environment, chemistry, and metabolism, Academic Press, New York, NY (1978) 45–70. Baumberger, J.P.: The carbon monoxide content of tobacco smoke and its absorption on inhalation; J. Pharm. Exp. Therap. 21 (1923) 23–34. Baumberger, J.P.: The nicotine content of tobacco smoke; J. Pharm. Exp. Therap. 21(1923) 35–46. Baumberger, J.P.: Amount of smoke produced from tobacco and its absorption in smoking as determined by electrical precipitation; J. Pharm. Exp. Therap. 21 (1923) 47–57. Baxter, J.M. and M.E. Hobbs: Cigarette smoke studies using oxygen isotopes. Carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide produced by combustion; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 23, 1966, p. 29. Baxter, J.E. and M.E. Hobbs: Investigation of some physico-chemical aspects of cigarette smoke using oxygen isotopes. CO and CO2 from atmospheric oxidation; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 65–71. Bayer, C.W. and M.S. Black: Passive smoking: Survey analysis of office smoking areas vs. environmental chamber studies; in: Proc. ASHRAE Conf. IAQ’86. ASHRAE, Atlanta GA (1986) 281–291. Bayer, C.W. and M.S. Black: Thermal desorption/gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis of volatile organic compounds in the offices of smokers and nonsmokers; Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrometry 14 (1987) 363–367.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1269
11/24/08 2:39:28 PM
1270
224. Bayer, C.W. and M.S. Black: Capillary chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in the indoor environment; J. Chromat. Sci. 25 (1987) 60–64. 225. Bayne, C.K.: A probability prediction model of mouse skin tumors based on chemical components of cigarette smoke condensate; Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Publ. No. ORNL/TM-7037 (October 1979). 225a. Beale, S.I.: The biosynthesis of G-aminolaevulinic acid in plants; Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond. B. 273 (1976) 99–108. 225b. Becker, T.W., M. Caboche, E. Carrayol, and B. Hirel: Nucleotide sequence of a tobacco cDNA encoding plastidic glutamine synthetase and light inducibility, organ specificity and diurnal rhythmicity in the expression of the corresponding genes of tobacco and tomato; Plant Mol. Biol. 19 (1992) 367–379. 226. Begutter, H., H. Klus, and I. Ultsch: Kapillargaschromatographische Bestimmung flüchtiger und tabakspezifischer N-Nitrosamine mittels des Thermo-EnergyAnalyzers [Capillary gas chromatographic determination of volatile and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines by means of the thermal energy analyzer]; J. Chromatog. 321 (1985) 475–479. 227. Behr, D.: Tobacco thunberganoids; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, 1978, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S06, 115–116. 228. VOID 229. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, A.J. Aasen, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 45. (2E,6S)-2,6-Dimethyl-2, 7-octadiene-1,6-diol, a new monoterpenoid from Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B32 (1978) 228–234. 230. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, and C.R. Enzell: Structure elucidation and synthesis of 3,3-dimethyl-7-hydroxy-2-octanone, a new seco norcarotenoid constituent of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B31 (1977) 793. 231. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 34. (3E,6E)-2,6-Dimethyl-10-oxo-3, 6-undecadien-2-ol and (2E)-3-methyl-4-oxo-2-nonen-8 -ol, two new constituents of Greek Nicotiana tabacum L.; Acta Chem. Scand. B31 (1977) 573–576. 232. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 41. Structure determination and synthesis of 5(13),7e-megastigmadiene-6,9-diol, a new constituent of Greek tobacco. Acta Chem. Scand. B31 (1977) 609–613. 233. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 47. (3S,6R,7E,9R)- and (3S*,6R*,7E*,9S*)-4, 7-Megastigmadiene-3.9-diol. Two new norcarotenoids of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B32 (1978) 391–394. 234. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 50. (3S,5R,8S,9X)-5,8-Epoxy-6megastigmene-3,9-diol and (3S*,5R*,6R*,7E,9X)-3,6epoxy-7-megastigmene-5,9-diol. Two new norcarotenoids of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B33 (1979) 701–704. 235. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, A.J. Aasen, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, J.-E. Berg, and A.-M. Pilotti: Tobacco chemistry. 44. (1S,2E,4S,6E,8R,11S,12R)-8,11-Epoxy-2,6-thunbergadiene-4,12-diol. Two new diterpenoids of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B32 (1978) 221–227. 236. Behr, D., I. Wahlberg, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, J.-E. Berg, and A.-M. Pilotti: Tobacco chemistry. 51. New cembranic diterpenoids from Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B34 (1980) 195–202.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
237. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International: Seminar in tobacco science: Sidestream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 17 (1997) 22–24. 238. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International: Seminar in tobacco science: Mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 17 (1997) 25–26. 239. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International: Seminar in tobacco science: Tobacco smoke components; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 17 (1997) 61–66. 239a. Bell, J.H.: Determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke condensate; Report, August 30, 1962, see www.Lorillarddocs.com 00118749 /8752; http://legacy. library.ucsf.edu/tid/zxg51e00. 240. Bell, J.H.: New techniques for smoke chemistry and physics. Liquid and gel permeation chromatography; Recent Adv. Tob. Res. 1 (1975) 51–71. 241. Bell, J.H.: Recent developments in tobacco smoke analytical techniques; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 511–532. 242. Bell, J.H.: Determination of glycyrrhizic acid in licorice extracts and chewing tobaccos; Tob. Sci. 24 (1980) 126–129. 243. Bell, J.H., W.E. Crouse, J.P. Morgan, and D.R. Smart: An improved apparatus for the determination of formaldehyde in sidestream smoke; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 25, 1987, p. 25. 244. Bell, J.H., M.S. Ireland, F.J. Schultz, and A.W. Spears: Identification of alkylated phenanthrenes in cigarette smoke condensate; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 20, 1969, p. 12. 245. Bell, J.H., M.S. Ireland, F.J. Schultz, and A.W. Spears: Identification of certain polyaromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 29, 1970, p. 21. 246. Bell, J.H., M.S. Ireland, and A.W. Spears: The isolation and identification of oxygenated aromatic hydrocarbons from cigarette smoke condensate; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 15, 1968, p. 9. 247. Bell, J.H., M.S. Ireland, and A.W. Spears: The identification of aromatic ketones in cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chem. 41 (1969) 310–313. 248. Bell, J.H., A.O. Saunders, and A.W. Spears: The contribution of tobacco constituents to phenol yield of cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 138–142. 249. Bell, J.P. and L.A. Lee: Analysis of total organic volatiles in cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 29, 1964, pp. 45–47. 250. Bell, P. and C.L. Mulch: Heavy metal concentrations in cigarette blends; Tob. Sci. 34 (1990) 32–34. 251. Belli, R. and V. Giuliani: Carbon monoxide poisoning, carbon monoxide from tobacco smoking in the blood, and chronic carbon monoxide absorption; Folio Med. 38 (1955) 351–358. 252. Bellin, S.A.: Evaluation of tobacco and smoke for carcinogenic activity; RDM, 1954, No. 10, April 16, see www. rjrtdocs.com 504913135 -3136.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1270
11/24/08 2:39:28 PM
Bibliography
253. Bellin, S.A.: Commercial production of fluorescent compounds from tobacco; CIM, 1954, No. 4, April 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504175049 -5049. 254. Bellin, S.A.: Commercial production of fluorescent compounds from tobacco; CIM, 1954, No. 2, April 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504175049 -5049; Large-scale extraction of fluorescent compounds from tobacco; RDM, 1954, No. 20, June 16; Fluorescent compounds in tobacco; RDR, 1955, No. 5, March 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501663197 -3203. 255. Bellin, S.A.: Nitrogen dioxide in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1959, No. 29, March 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500611365 -1367. 256. Bellin, S.A.: Correlation of chemical constituents and aging changes of burley tobacco; RDR, 1960, No. 6, March 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510548250 -8262. 257. Bellin, S.A.: Fatty acids in the smoke condensate of burley and flue-cured tobaccos. A factorial design experiment showing the effect of variation of cigarette moisture, weight and tobacco type; RDR, 1961, No. 8, February 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504912499 -2524. 258. Bellin, S.A.: Higher fatty acids in the smoke condensate of burley and flue-cured tobaccos; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 6, 1961, p. 4. 259. Bellin, S.A.: Identification of C15 and C17 saturated acids and C15, C16, and C17 unsaturated fatty acids in tobacco and tobacco smoke; RDR, 1962, No. 5, January 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938737 -8746. 260. Bellin, S.A.: Quantitative procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium, and magnesium in small quantities of tobacco, nutriculture, solutions, and bacteria; RDM, 1963, No. 10, January 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612361 -2371. 261. Bellin, S.A.: An evaluation of biological activity. I. Herbicidal action of nicotine derivatives and related compounds as determined by tests with Lemna Minor (Duckweed); RDR, 1964, No. 14, March 17, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500963430 -3445. 262. Bellin, S.A.: An evaluation of biological activity. II. The toxicity of nicotine and its derivatives to minnows; RDR, 1964, No. 15, March 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963446 -3458. 263. Bellin, S.A. and C.W. Nystrom: Determination of petroleum ether extracts in tobacco: A comparison of methods made for the Methods Committee of the Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference; RDM, 1962, No. 11, February 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601144 -1147. 264. Bellin, S.A. and C.W. Nystrom: Polonium-210 in tobacco. II. Proposed experiments with growing tobacco plants relating to atmospheric contamination; RDM, 1964, No. 47, April 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602296 -2299. 265. Bellin, S.A., C.W. Nystrom, and N.W. Sizemore: Polonium-210 in tobacco. III. Further evidence that a major portion originates from atmospheric contamination of tobacco plants; RDR, 1964, No. 50, October 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500964169 -4187. 266. Bellin, S.A. and R.R. Smeby: Malonic acid in green and cured American and Oriental tobaccos; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 75 (1958) 1–5. 267. Bellin, S.A. and C.R. Walton: Hydrogen cyanide in tobacco and in smoke of tobacco purchased from the Stabilization Corporation; RDM, 1968, No. 33, May 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614032 -4036.
1271
268. Bemelmans, J.M.H. and M.C.T.N. DeBrauw: The presence of chloroanisoles in tainted tobacco; Sci. Total Environ. 3 (1974) 126–128. 269. Benedict, R.C. and R.L. Stedman: Enzymatic inhibition by smoke constituents and solutions of cigarette smoke; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 11, 1968, p. 7; Complexity of enzymatic inhibition by cigarette smoke; Experientia 24 (1969) 1205–1206. 270. Benedict, R.C. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXXVII. Inhibition of lactic, alcohol and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenases by cigarette smoke and components thereof; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 166–168. 271. Benedict, R.C., R.L. Stedman, and R.L. James: The modifications of selected biochemical properties of cigarette smoke by the use of specially treated filters; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 22, 1970, p. 13; Composition studies on tobacco. XLVI. Attempts to modify selected biochemical properties of cigarette smoke by the use of specially treated filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 189–193. 272. Benedict, R.C., D. Strange, and L. Lakritz: Some observations on the reducing properties of cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 17, 1969, p. 11. 273. Benner, C.L., J.M. Bayona, F.M. Caka, H. Tang, L. Lewis, J. Crawford, J. Lamb, M.L. Lee, E.A. Lewis, L.D. Hansen, and D.J. Eatough: Chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke. 2. Particulate phase compounds; Environ. Sci. Technol. 23 (1989) 688–699. 274. Benner, J.F., H.R. Burton, and D. Burdick: Composition of cigarette smoke from high- and low-nitrate burley tobacco; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 37–40. 275. Benner, J.F., H.R. Burton, and D. Burdick: Correlation between the amounts of various leaf constituents and the levels of nicotine, phenols, and benzo[a]pyrene in the smoke condensate; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 18, 1969, p. 11. 276. Benner, J.F., H.R. Burton, and D. Burdick: Temperatureyield profiles for the pyrolysis of borate-treated tobacco; Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 29, 1968, p. 21; Temperature-yield profiles of tobacco and tobacco constituents. I. Borate-treated and untreated tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 74–79. 277. Benner, J.F., H.R. Burton, and D. Burdick: Temperatureyield profiles for the pyrolysis of borate-treated tobacco; Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 29, 1968, p. 21; Temperature-yield profiles of tobacco and tobacco constituents. II. Yields of phenol and cresols from untreated and borate-treated cellulose and lignin; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 134–139. 278. Benner, J.F., C.K. Keene, and T.W. Holt: Smoke analysis, condensate preparation and condensate fractionation; Proc. Univ. Kentucky Tob. Hlth. Workshop, 1973 Conf. Rpt. Lexington, KY 4 (1973) 408–420. 279. Bennett, C.B., C.H. Midgett, K.S. Johnston, J.K. Owen, J.C. Welden, and S.M. Shanmugan: An automated analytical method for determination of tobacco specific
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1271
11/24/08 2:39:28 PM
1272
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
280.
281.
282.
283.
284.
285.
286.
287.
288.
289.
289a.
290.
291.
nitrosamines in tobacco; 2002 CORESTA Congress, Paper ST 33 (2002). Bennett, M.B., L. Weissbecker, J.O. Millham, and F.E. Resnik: The quantitative determination of acrolein in cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 33, 1964, p. 51. Bentley, H.R.: A study of carcinogenic components in tobacco smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 39 (1962) 25. Bentley, H.R. and E.G.N. Berry: The constituents of tobacco smoke: An annotated bibliography. Research Paper No. 3; Tobacco Manufacturers’ Standing Committee, London (1959). Bentley, H.R. and E.G.N. Berry: The constituents of tobacco smoke: An annotated bibliography. Research Paper No. 3: First Supplement; Tobacco Manufacturers’ Standing Committee, London (1960). Bentley, H.R. and J.G. Burgan: Benzopyrene in tobacco and tobacco smoke; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 16, 1958, pp. 6–7; Polynuclear hydrocarbons in tobacco and tobacco smoke. I. 3,4-Benzpyrene; Analyst 83 (1958) 442–447. Bentley, H.R. and J.G. Burgan: Polynuclear hydrocarbons in tobacco and tobacco smoke. II. The origin of 3,4-benzpyrene found in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Analyst 85 (1960) 723–727. Bentley, H.R. and J.G. Burgan: Polynuclear hydrocarbons in tobacco and tobacco smoke. III. The inhibition of the formation of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; Analyst 85 (1960) 727–730. Bentley, H.R. and J.G. Burgan: Cigarette smoke condensate: Preparation and routine laboratory estimation. Research Paper No. 4: Second Edition; Tobacco Manufacturers’ Standing Committee, London (1961). Bentrovato, B., A. Porter, M. Youssef, and P.J. Dunn: Variations in tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide deliveries obtained by smokers of the same brands; Proc. Smoke and Technology Groups Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1995) 151–165. Bereman, M., N. Glassbrook, J. Eaton, F. Jaeger and R.D. Bereman: Determination of pyrrolidine in tobacco leaves by tobacco type and leaf position; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 36, 2003, p. 41. Bereman, R.D.: Method and product for removing carcinogens from tobacco smoke; U.S. Patent Application No. 20030000538 (January 2, 2003), Bereman, R.D.: Method of making a smoking composition; U.S. Patent No. 6,789,548 (September 14, 2004), see www.patentstorm.us/patents/6789548.html; Rainey, P. and R.D. Bereman: Method of making a smoking composition; U.S. Patent No. 6,959,712 (November 1, 2005), see www.patentstorm.us/patents/6959712.html. Bereman, R.D., T. Cheng, Y. Ding, I.G. Gillman, P. Rainey, N. Finkle, X. Shi, A. Stinson, and J. Keefer: The quantitative determination of 18 selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the mainstream of the Kentucky Reference Cigarette, 2R4F; Manuscript, December (2004). Bereman, R.D., T. Cheng, A. Stinson, P. Rainey, I.G. Gillman, X. Shi, and N. Glasbrook: The effect of the palladium catalyst in reducing PAH concentrations in
292.
292a. 292b.
293.
293a.
294.
295.
296
297.
298.
299.
300.
301.
302.
303.
304.
the Omni® cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke; Manuscript, December (2004). Bereman, R.D., D.L. Larkins, and P. Rainey: The reduction of PAHs in mainstream tobacco smoke: Applying chemistry to produce a reduced harm cigarette; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 93, 2001, p. 74. Berenblum, I.: Carcinogenesis and tumor pathogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 2 (1954) 129–175. Bergström, M., A. Nordberg, E. Lunell, G. Antoni, and B. Långström: Regional deposition of 11C-nicotine vapor in the human airway as visualized by positron emission tomography; Clin. Pharmacol. Therap. 57 (1995) 309–317. Beringer, M. and R. Koch: Der Einfluss von Absorpentien auf die Zusammensetzungen des Rauches von Folientabak [The influence of adsorbents on the composition of smoke from sheet tobacco]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 393–394. Berman, H.M., J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T.N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I.N. Shindyalov, and P.E. Bourne: The protein data bank; Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 235–242. Berner, A. and J. Marek: Investigation of the distribution of several smoke constituents in smoke particles of various sizes; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 7 (1967) 118–127. Bernfeld, P., C.W. Nixon, and F. Homburger: Studies on the effect of irritant vapors on ciliary mucus transport. I. Phenol and cigarette smoke; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 6 (1964) 103–111. Berry, E.G.N.: The constituents of tobacco smoke: An annotated bibliography. Research Paper No. 3: Second Supplement; Tob. Manufacturers’ Standing Committee, London (1963). Best, F.W.: Sugar content of flue-cured tobacco and its relationship to tobacco and smoke composition; RDR, 1970, No. 6, January 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501000035 -0055. Best, F.W.: Analysis of light gases in cigarette smoke vapor phases; R&DM, 1981, No. 24, July 17, see www. rjrtdocs.com 514901238 -1246. Best, F.W.: Characterization of sidestream vapor phase organic components; R&DM, 1982, No. 47, November 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501660375 -0383. Best, F.W.: Radiotracer studies with carbon-14 labeled glycerol: Fate in total smoke; in: Proceedings of the international conference on physical and chemical processes occurring in a burning cigarette, edited by D.E. Townsend, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, WinstonSalem, NC (1987) 244–260, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510154818 -4824. Best, F.W.: The effect of periphery wrapper and core applications of glycerol on its fate during smoking; R&DM, 1987, No. 87, May 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506491889 -1905. Best, F.W.: Fates of nicotine and glycerol in total smoke of BETA 90 protocepts; R&DM, 1990, No. 181, August 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508347294 -7311. Best, F.W.: Summary of radiotracer fate studies performed at RJR with cigarette constituents/additives since 1972. Part II; MEM, 1990, No. 1, May 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508675544 -5552. Best, F.W.: Summary of radiotracer fate studies performed at RJR with cigarette constituents/additives prior to 1972.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1272
11/24/08 2:39:29 PM
Bibliography
305.
306.
307.
308.
309.
310.
311.
312.
313.
314.
315.
316.
317.
318.
319.
Part I; MEM, 1990, May 1, No. 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510760902 -0916. Best, F.W.: Citric acid migration and distribution in total smoke of Salem KS and NN (a protocept that heats but does not burn tobacco); MDR, 1991, No. 011, November 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508275250 -5260. Best, F.W.: Radiotracer fate studies with 14C-nicotine in total smoke of REST process materials including transfer efficiencies to MS TPM from products with differing nicotine levels and differing air dilution levels; R&DM, 1990, No. 201, September 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512323835 -3869. Best, F.W.: Radiotracer studies to determine the fate of levulinic acid in filtered cigarettes, its distribution in total smoke, its intact level in MS TPM, SS TPM, and filters, and its migration within cigarettes upon aging; MDR, 1991, No. 3, May 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508675911 -5933; 510269761 -9783. Best, F.W.: Comparison of nicotine transfer to smoke from free base and salt addition with cigarettes containing radiolabeled dl-nicotine and dl-nicotine levulinate; MDR, 1991, No. 4, June 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508208536 -8543. Best, F.W.: Effects of some cigarette construction parameters on menthol migration and transfer; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 19 (1993) 155–201. Best, F.W. and D.C. Friende: The fate of glycerol applied to cigarette wrappers measured during puff and smolder periods; R&DM, 1988, No. 25, January 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510168054 -8055. Best, F.W., D.C. Friende, and J.W. Gee: Fate of core injected 14C-glycerol in total smoke during puff and smolder; R&DM, 1988, No. 91, March 11, see www.rjrtdocs. com 507040837 -0856. Best, F.W., C.R. Green, R.A. Heckman, C.W. Miller, M.P. Newell, and A.L. Angel: Smoke composition of More blend with TOD 06433 wrapper (L9477A) to More blend with Ecusta 856 wrapper (L9477B); RDM, 1976, No. 15, March 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616700 -6731. Best, F.W. and J. Munoz: Evaluation of analytical method for NNN in smoke matrix (5–3H)nitrosonornicotine; PD 1994, No. 94–230, August 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510846256 -6265. Best, F.W. and T.M. Reavis: Analysis of vapor phase from whole smoke; RDM, 1980, No. 24, July 21, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500617901 -7909. Best, F.W. and T.S. Sink: Mainstream and sidestream volatile aromatic hydrocarbons (VAH); R&DM, 1985, No. 59, July 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504961124 -1137. Best, F.W. and T.S. Sink: Fate of 14C-labeled leaf alcohol in total smoke from Winston KS cigarettes; R&DM, 1988, No. 59, February 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507038333 -8347. Best, F.W. and T.S. Sink: Fate of 14C-labeled linalool in total smoke from Winston KS cigarettes; R&DM, 1989, No. 3, January 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508280556 -0562. Best, F.W. and T.S. Sink: Fate of 14C-labeled phenethyl isovalerate in total smoke from Winston KS cigarettes; R&DM, 1989, No. 69, March 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508281917 -1945. Best, F.W., T.S. Sink, and D.C. Friende: Fate of 14C-glycerol in total smoke puff by puff study; R&DM, 1989, No. 27, January 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508280957 -0984.
1273
320. Best, F.W., T.S. Sink, J.W. Gee, and D.C. Friende: The fate of propylene glycol in total smoke with standard and human mimic puffing parameters; R&DM, 1987, No. 213, December 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506489759 -9768. 321. Betts, T.E.: Sugar in tobacco: Its effect on smoke pH; Lab. Practica 30 (1981) 341–434. 321a. Bettina Johne, A.B., B. Weissbecker, and S. Schütz: Volatile emissions from Aesculus hippocastanum induced by mining of larval stages of Cameraria ohridella influence oviposition by conspecific females; J. Chem. Ecology 32 (2006) 2303–2319. 321b. Bezabeh, D.Z. and M.B. Clarke: Application of LC-MS/ MS for characterization of carbohydrates in tobacco products; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 9, 2005, pp. 23–24. 321c. Bhakuni, D.S., P.P. Joshi, H. Uprety, and R.S. Kopil: Roseoside – A C13 glycoside from “Vinca rosea”; Phytochemistry 13 (1974) 2541–2543, 322. Bharadwaj, V.P., S. Takayama, T. Yamada, and A.Tanimura: N’-Nitrosonornicotine in Japanese tobacco products; Gann 66 (1975) 585–586. 323. Bhati, A.: Neophytadiene, the diterpenic hydrocarbon from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum, Hicks); Perfumery Essent. Oil Rec. 53 (1962) 685–688; The terpenic constituents of tobacco; Perfumery Essent. Oil Rec. 55 (1964) 124–130. 324. Bhide, S.V., J. Nair, G.B. Maru, U.J. Nair, B.V. Kameshwar Rao, M.K. Chakrabory, and K.D. Brunnemann: Tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines (TSNA) in green mature and processed tobacco leaves from India. Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1987) 29–32. 325. Bhide, S.V., P.R. Padma, and A.J. Amonkar: Antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic effects of betel leaf extract against the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK); in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 520–524. 326. Bhide, S.V., P.R. Padma, N. Ammigan, A.J. Amonkar, and J. Nair: Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of tobacco extract, N’-nitrosonornicotine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and the suppression of its tumorigenicity by betel-leaf extract; in: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by S.V. Bhide and K.V.K. Rao, Omega Science, New Delhi, India (1990) 81–90. 327. Biacs, P., K. Gruiz, and J. Hollo: A study of tobacco lipids. Part I. Changes in the lipids of tobacco leaves in the course of vegetative development of the plant; Acta Alimentaria 5 (1976) 403–423. 328. Biacs, P., K. Gruiz, and J. Hollo: Analytical investigation of the polar and neutral lipids of burley tobacco; Proc. Hungarian Ann. Mtg. Biochem. 15 (1978) 89–90. 329. Bilimoria, M.H., J. Johnson, M.A. Nisbet, S. Schmeller, and K.K. Georgieff: Inhibition of radical initiated polymerisation of vinyl acetate by tobacco smoke and some polycyclic hydrocarbons; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 158–164. 330. Bilinsky, W.R. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XIII. Neophytadiene levels in various types and grades; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 162–163. 331. Bill, M.E., G. Vilcins, and F.E. Resnik: Infrared analysis of triethylene glycol in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1273
11/24/08 2:39:29 PM
1274
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
332. 333.
334.
335.
336.
337.
338.
339.
339a.
340.
341. 342.
343.
344.
344a.
345.
345a.
Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 19, 1958, pp. 7–8; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 118–120. Bill, M.E., G. Vilcins, and F.E. Resnik: Triacetin content of cigarette filters; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 26–28. Binder, H. and W. Lindner: Bestimmung von Äthylenoxid im Rauch garantiert unbegaster Zigaretten [Determination of ethylene oxide in the smoke of a guaranteed untreated cigarette]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 13 (1972) 215–220. Bindler, G.N., J.J. Piadé, and D. Schulthess: Evaluation of selected steroids as chemical markers of past or presently occurring fungal infections on tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1988) 127–134. Binet, L. and M. Bochet: Tabac et oxyde de carbonne [Tobacco and oxide of carbon]; Presse Med. 63 (1955) 283–284. Bingham, M.A., J.J.D. Craig, and R. McKeivor: Transfer of additives to mainstream smoke; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 20, 1979, p. 10. Binns, M.R., B.F. Zilkey, W.A. Court, E.K. Walker, V.A. Dirks, and P.K. Basrur: Studies on Canadian tobacco and tobacco smoke. 2. Multivariate analysis of selected physical and chemical characteristics; Tob. Sci. 27 (1983) 141–149. Binopoulos, X., G. Kavazis, and A.G. Sficas: The relationship between cigarette smoke condensate and the principal components of the tobacco leaf; CORESTA, Vienna, Austria (1964). Binopoulos, X., G. Kavazis, and A.G. Sficas: Beziehungen zwischen Hauptbestandteilen des Cigarettentabaks und den Rauchkondensaten [Correlations between main tobacco components and smoke condensate yields]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 15–18. Birkemeyer, C.S.: Signal-metabolome interactions in plants; Ph.D. Thesis University of Potsdam, November 5, 2005. Black, C.C., A. San Pietro, G. Norris, and D. Limbach: Photosynthetic phosphorylation in the presence of spinach phosphodoxin; Plant Physiol. 39 (1964) 279–283. Black, D.K.: Isolation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1966) 1380. Black, D.K. and F. Dickens: Studies on cigarette-smoke condensate and its components: Interactions with cysteine of some carcinogenic compounds; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 43 (1966) 22. Black, D.K. and F. Dickens: The isolation of farnesene from cigarette smoke condensate; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1966) 197–198. Blaha, K.M., L. Kasparova, Z. Cabelkova, and M. Cikrt: Smoking as a source of cadmium, nickel, mercury, and manganese intake; Cesk. Hyg. 34 (1989) 103–110. Blaim, K. and J. Szynal: Chemical analysis of the pectic substances in tobacco leaves; ACAT Agrobot. 27 (1974) 29–37. Blakeley, S., S. Gottlob-McHugh, J. Wan, L. Crews, B. Miki, K. Ko and D.T. Dennis: Molecular characterization of plastid pyruvate kinase from castor and tobacco; Plant Molecular Biol. 27 (1995) 79–89. Blancard, D., R. Delon, B.W. Blair, and T. Glover: Major tobacco disease. B. Virus diseases; Chapter 6B in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 198–215.
345b. Bland, M.M., C.S. Levings iii, and D.F. Matzinger: The ATPase subunit 6 gene of tobacco mitochondria contains an unusual sequence; Current Genet. 12 (1987) 475–481. 345c. BLASTX Search, Accession Number: M20620.1: see http://cdna01.dna.affrc.go.jp/cDNA/ANNOTATE/ DETAIL_X/001–111/detail_X_001–111-F01.html. 346. Bleiberg, M.J., W.J. Scott, and R.P. Beliles: Safety evaluation of diphenamid and desmethyldiphenamid in cigarette smoke by repeated inhalation exposure of rats and dogs; Soc. Toxicol. Mtg, Washington, DC (1968); Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 12 (1968) 299. 347. Bloch, B. and H. Dreifuss: Über die experimentelle Erzeugung von Carcinomen mit Lymphdrüsen und Lungenmetastasen durch Teerbestandteile [On the experimental production of carcinomas with lymph gland and lung metastases with tar components]; Schweiz. Med. Wchnschr. 2 (1921) 1033. 348. Blomberg, L. and G. Widmark: Separation of fresh tobacco smoke on packed polar gas chromatographic column prior to on-line analysis by gas chromatographymass spectrometry using a non-polar capillary column; J. Chromatog. 106 (1975) 57–71. 349. Bluhm, A.L., J. Weinstein, and J. Sousa: Free radicals in cigarette smoke; Nature 29 (1971) 500. 350. Bock, F.G.: Studies on mouse sebaceous gland suppressors in cigarette smoke condensate; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(3) (1957) 189. 351. Bock, F.G.: Dose response: Experimental carcinogenesis; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 57–63. 352. Bock, F.G.: Tumor promoters in tobacco and cigarette smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1849–1852. 353. Bock, F.G.: Cocarcinogenic properties of nicotine; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 129–139. 354. Bock, F.G., I. Michelson, I.D.J. Bross, and R.L. Priore: Carcinogenic activity of smoke condensate from cigarettes with ammonium sulfamate-treated paper; Cancer 33 (1974) 1010–1016. 355. Bock, F.G., G.E. Moore, and P.C. Clark: Carcinogenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate. II. Biological activity of refined tar from several brands of cigarettes; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 34 (1965) 481–493. 356. Bock, F.G., G.E. Moore, and S.K. Crouch: Tumor promoting activity of extracts of unburned tobacco; Science 145 (1964) 831–833. 357. Bock, F.G., G.E. Moore, J.E. Dowd, and P.C. Clark: Carcinogenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate. Biological activity of refined tar from certain brands of cigarettes; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 181 (1962) 668–673. 358. Bock, F.G., R.J. Shamberger, and H.K. Myers: Tumorpromoting agents in unburned cigarette tobacco; Nature 208 (1965) 584–585. 359. Bock, F.G., A.P. Swain, and R.L. Stedman: Bioassay of major fractions of cigarette smoke condensate by an accelerated technique; Cancer Res. 29 (1969) 584–587. 360. Bock, F.G., A.P. Swain, and R.L. Stedman: Carcinogenesis assay of subfractions of cigarette smoke condensate prepared by solvent-solvent separation of the neutral fraction; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 49 (1972) 477–483.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1274
11/24/08 2:39:29 PM
Bibliography
361. Bock, F.G. and T.C. Tso: Chemical and biological identification of tumorigenic components of tobacco; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, 1975, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76–1221 (1976) 161–174. 362. Bodnár, J.: Composition of tobacco smoke and denicotinization of tobacco; Termeszettudomanyi Kozlony 62 (1930a) 397–404. 363. Bodnár, J.: Composition of tobacco smoke and denicotinization of tobacco; Termeszettudomanyi Kozlony 62 (1930) 443–446. 364. Bodnár, J., V.L. Nagy, and S. Dickmann: Uptake of nicotine by the human organism during smoking: Fate of nicotine. Biochem. Z. 276 (1935) 317–322. 365. Bodnár J, V.L. Nagy and T. Vecsey: Adsorption of nicotine from tobacco smoke by different adsorbents; Pharm. Zentralhalle 76 (1935) 657–661. 366. Bodnár, J. and Z. Votisky: Measurement of tobacco quality on the basis of chemical composition of tobacco and the determination of quality through tobacco smoke reaction or “Smoke Number”; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 80 (1940) 515–527. 367. Bodnar, J.A., D.H. Smith, F.D. Jordan, and M.F. Borgerding: The determination of beta-carotene and other selected carotenoids in green tobacco; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 38, 1995, p. 40, see www. rjrtdocs.com 523002795 -2795. 368. Bodnar, J.E. and J.N. Schumacher: Sidestream smoke composition comparison of 1R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarette and a new cigarette that heats but does not burn tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, No. 59, 1988, p. 46, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507348636 -8636. 369. Boenig, H.V.: Investigation of the pyrolytic products of irradiated cigarettes; U.S. Atomic Energy Comm., Rpt. No. ORO-633 (TID-4500, 46th Ed.), (1965) pp. 1–33. 370. Boenig, H.V.: Free radicals and health; Spindletop Res. Rpt. C-8, Lexington, KY (1966) 1–133. 371. Boenig, H.V.: Free radicals and health: Indicators for a unifying concept. See Appendix to Boenig H.V., Free radicals and health; Spindletop Res. Rpt. C-8, Lexington, KY (1966) pp. 1–19. 372. Boenig, H.V.: Free radicals and health: Indicators for a unifying concept; J. Am. Geriat. Soc. 14 (1966) 1211–1220. 373. Boening, G.: Arsen im Tabak [Arsenic in tobacco]; Chem. Ztg. 29 (1905) 183–184. 373a. Boffey, S.A. and D.H. Northcote: Pectin synthesis during the wall generation of plasmolysed tobacco leaf cells; Biochem. J. 150 (1975) 433–440. 374. Bogden, J.D., F.W. Kemp, M. Buse, I.S. Thind, D.B. Louria, J. Forgacs, E. Lians, and I.M. Terrones: Composition of tobaccos from countries with high and low incidences of lung cancer. I. Selenium, polonium-210, tar, and nicotine; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66 (1981) 27–31. 375. Bogen, E.: The composition of cigarets and cigaret smoke; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 93 (1929) 1110–1114. 376. Bogen, E.: Irritant factors in tobacco smoke; Calif. & West. Med. 45 (1936) 342–346. 377. Bogen, E. and R.N. Loomis: Tobacco tar: An experimental investigation of its alleged carcinogenic action; Am. J. Cancer 16 (1932) 1515–1521.
1275
378. Bogner, H.: Die Bestimmung des Nikotingehaltes des Zigarettenrauches [Determination of the nicotine content of cigarette smoke]; Medical Inaugural Dissertation, Erlangen (1921). 379. Bogovski, P., M. Borzsonyi, B.C. Challis, G. Eisenbrand, D. Hoffmann, P. Magee, M. Okada, R. Preussmann, and S.R. Tannenbaum: N-Nitroso compounds: Exposures, mechanisms and relevance to human cancer — An overview; in: Relevance of N-nitroso compounds to human cancer: Exposure mechanisms, edited by H. Bartsch, I.K. O’Neill, and R. Schulte-Hermann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 84 (1987) 5–10. 380. Bogovski, P., R. Preussmann, and E.A. Walker (Editors): N-Nitroso compounds: Analysis and formation; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 3 (1972). 381. Bogovski, P. and E.A. Walker (Editors): N-Nitroso compounds in the environment; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 9 (1975). 382. Bohanon, H.: Variance of ETS nicotine levels in a semicontrolled office environment; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 64, 1994, p. 65. 383. Bohlander, P.J.: Reduced efficiency ventilated filters providing lowered carbon monoxide per unit tar delivered; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 16, 1981, p. 8. 383a. Boichenko, V.A., K.P. Bader, V.V. Klimov, and G.H. Schmid: Evidence for predominant participation of photosystem IIß-units in nitrogen formation by hydroxylamine-treated tobacco chloroplasts; Plant Cell Physiol. 35 (1994) 845–848. 384. Bokelman, G.H. and W.P. Hempfling: Influence of nitrogen fertilization rate on TSNA contents in cured bright and burley tobaccos; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 87, 1999, p. 68. 385. Bokelman, G.H. and W.S. Ryan Jr: Analyses of bright and burley tobacco laminae and stems; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 29–36. 385a. Bokelman, G.H., W.S. Ryan Jr, H.H. Sun, and G.C. Rubin: Tobacco cell wall structural biopolymers; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 11 (1985) 71–104. 386. Bokhoven, C. and H.J. Niessen: Amounts of oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke, with and without inhalation; Nature 192 (1961) 458–459. 387. Boldridge, D.W.: Apparatus for the determination of nitric oxide in sidestream smoke; R&DM, 1985, No. 34, May 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505120293 -0305; 504776605 -6613. 387a. Boller, T., J.-M. Neuhaus, and J.A. Ryals: Signal sequences for vacuolar sorting; U.S. Patent No. 6,054,637 (May 25, 2000). 388. Bolm, F.: Über den Rauch, Grenzwerte für Nikotin, und die Methods der Nikotinbestimmung nach Pfyl und Schmitt [On smoke, nicotine limit values, and the nicotine determination method of Pfyl and Schmitt]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 59 (1930) 602–606. 389. Bolt, H.J.N.: 1’-Hexanoylnornicotine and 1’-octanoylnornicotine from tobacco; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 2341–2343. 390. Bolt, H.J.N. and R.E. Clarke: Cholesterol glucoside in tobacco; Phytochemistry 9 (1970) 819–822. 391. Bombick, B.R., J.T. Avalos, K.P. Putnam, D.L. Bowman, J.B. Mabe, K.W. Fowler, D.W. Bombick, W.T. Morgan, and D.J.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1275
11/24/08 2:39:30 PM
1276
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
392.
393.
394.
395.
396.
397.
398.
399.
400.
401.
402.
403.
404.
Doolittle: Comparative studies on the genotoxic potential of mainstream smoke condensate from menthol and non-menthol cigarettes which burn or primarily heat tobacco; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 8, 2001, p. 25. Bonnet, J.: What carcinogenic substances have been demonstrated to be present in tobacco smoke condensate; Proc. 1st Workshop Conf. on Lung Cancer Res. (App. A) (1958) 27–30. Bonnet, J.: Quantitative analysis of benzo(a)pyrene in vapors coming from melted tar; Symposium: Analysis of Carcinogenic Air Pollutants, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 221–223. Bonnet, J. and S. Neukomm: Sur la composition chimique de la fumée du tabac. I. Analyse de la fraction neuter [On the chemical composition of tobacco smoke. I. Analysis of the neutral fraction]; Helv. Chim. Acta 39 (1956) 1724–1733. Bonnet, J. and S. Neukomm: Sur la composition chimique de la fumée du tabac. II. La fraction alkaline [On the chemical composition of tobacco smoke. II. The alkaline fraction]; Helv. Chim. Acta 40 (1957) 113–118. Bonnet, J. and S. Neukomm: Sur la composition chimique de la fumée du tabac. III. La fraction acide et l’urethanne [On the chemical composition of tobacco smoke. III. The acidic fraction and urethane]; Helv. Chim. Acta 40 (1957) 717–721. Bonnet, J. and S. Neukomm: Résultats actuels des recherches chimiques sur la composition de la fumée du tabac [Current results from chemical research on the composition of tobacco smoke]; Oncologia 10 (1957) 124–129. Bonnet, J. and S. Neukomm: New investigations on carcinogenic substances in tobacco smoke; Oncologia 12 (1959) 80–86. Bonnet, J. and S. Neukomm: Carcinogenic and cocarcinogenic substances in tobacco smoke; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 561–563. Borbély, A.: Die neuen Ergebnisse über die gesundheitsschädigende Wirkung des Zigarettenrauchens und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung der Inhaltionstiefe [New results on the unhealthy action of cigarette smoke and experimental investigation of the determination of the depth of its inhalation]; Z. Präventivmed. 10 (1965) 114–139. Borbély, F.: Über der Toxikologie des Tabakgenusses [About the toxicology of tobacco enjoyment]; Z. Präventivmed. 7 (1962) 118–134; Toxikologische Aspekte des Rauchens [The toxicologic aspect of smoking]; Die Umschau 2 (1963) 37–42. Borgerding, M.F., J.E. Bodnar, H.L. Chung, P.P. Mangan, C.C. Morrison, C.H. Risner, J.C. Rodgers, D.F. Simmons, M.S. Uhrig, F.N. Wendelboe, D.E. Wingate, and L.S. Winkler: Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part I. Chemical composition of mainstream smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 36 (1997) 169–182, see www.rjrtdocs. com 515960437 -0485. Borgerding, M.F., J.E. Bodnar, R.D. Hicks, D.M. Riggs, E.J. Nanni, and G.W. Fulp: Comparisons of a new cigarette (NC) which heats rather than burns tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 52, 1988, p. 43. Borgerding, M.F., H.L. Chung, W.M. Coleman III, J.J. Elder, J.A. Giles, B.M. Gordon, D.S. Moore, C.E. Rix,
405.
406. 407.
408.
409.
410.
411.
412.
413.
413a.
414.
415.
M.S. Uhrig, and E.L. White: Analysis of flue-cured tobacco essential oil by hyphenated analytical techniques; R&DR, 1987, No. 7, October 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506250529 -0616; 506488895 -8982. Borgerding, M.F. and R.S. Dunn: Determination of carbonyl compounds. II. Simultaneous analysis of mainstream and sidestream smokes; R&DR, 1984, No. 4, August 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504397361 -7381. VOID Borgerding, M.F., R.S. Dunn, and H.L. Chung: Determination of carbonyl compounds. I. Analysis of mainstream smoke; R&DR, 1984, No. 3, August 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510622236 -2263. Borgerding, M.F., R.S. Dunn, F.A. Thome, H.L. Chung, D.S. Moore, T.R. Conner, D.L. Heavner, and P.H. Ayers: An improved method for the determination of selected carbonyl compounds in smoke; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38 Paper No. 50, 1984, p. 27. Borgerding, M.F., L.A. Milhous Jr, R.D. Hicks, V.B. Stennis, D.F. Simmons, and A.M. Slater: Determination of the major constituents in the mainstream particulate phase of a new cigarette which heats, rather than burns tobacco; 196th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Los Angeles, CA (1988); 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 53, 1988, p. 43, see www.rjrtdocs. com 508893053 -3089. Borgerding, M.F., T.A. Perfetti, and S. Ralapati: Determination of nicotine in tobacco, tobacco processing environments and tobacco products; Chapter 9 in: Analytical determination of nicotine and related compounds and their metabolites, edited by J.W. Gorrod and P. Jacob III, Elsevier, New York, NY (1999) 285–391. Borland, C.D.R., A.T. Chamberlain, T.W. Higenbottam, R.W. Barber, and B.A. Thrush: A comparison between the rate of reaction of nitric oxide in the gas phase and in whole cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 67–73. Bosco, J. and G. Kalineka: Analysis of tobacco and tobacco combustion products by x-ray emission spectroscopy; Atomki Kozl. 18 (1976) 565–575. Bourlas, M.C. and R.C. Esperdy: The determination of nicotine in particulate matter using citric acid and bromomaleic acid; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 24, 1972, pp. 35–37; Bourlas, M.C., C.E. Thomas, R.C. Esperdy, and W.F. Kuhn: The determination of nicotine in particulate matter using citric acid and bromomaleic acid; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 354–358. Bouropoulos, N., S. Weiner, and L. Addadi: Calcium oxalate crystals in tomato and tobacco plants: Morphology and in vitro interactions of crystal-associated macromolecules; Chemistry 7 (2001) 1881–1888. Boutwell, R.K., H.P. Rusch, and D.K. Bosch: The action of phenols and related compounds in tumor formation; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. (1) (1955) 6–7; Boutwell, R.K., H.P. Rusch, and B. Booth: Tumor production by phenol and related compounds; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(2) (1956) 96; Boutwell, R.K. and D.K. Bosch: The tumor-promoting action of phenols and related compounds for mouse skin; Cancer Res. 19 (1959) 413–424. Bowery, T.G., W.R. Evans, F.E. Guthrie, and R.L. Rabb: Insecticide residues on tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 7 (1959) 693–702.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1276
11/24/08 2:39:30 PM
Bibliography
416. Bowery, T.G., P.E. Gatterdam, F.E. Guthrie, and R.L. Rabb: Fate of inhaled C14-TDE in rabbits; J. Agr. Food Chem. 13 (1965) 356–359. 417. Bowery, T.G. and F.E. Guthrie: Determination of the residues of the insecticide Guthion in cigarette smoke; 13th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 13, Paper No. 19, 1959, p. 11. 418. Bowery, T.G. and F.E. Guthrie: Determination of the Sevin residues on green and flue-cured tobacco and in mainstream cigarette smoke; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 20, 1960, p. 11. 419. Bowery, T.G. and F.E. Guthrie: Determination of insecticide residues on green and flue-cured tobacco and in mainstream cigarette smoke; J. Agr. Food Chem. 9 (1961) 193–197. 420. Bowman, D.R., T.C. Tso, and J.F. Chaplin: Leaf characteristics of four flue-cured varieties according to stalk position. III. Starch, cellulose, lignin, wax, crude ash, and alkalinity of water soluble ash; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 8–9. 421. Boyd, D.F., C.D. Briggs, and P.W. Darby: Dependence of the gas phase composition of smoke on the combustion temperature of tobacco products; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 160–165. 421a. Boyland, E. and A.M. Brues: Carcinogenic action of dibenzcarbazoles; Proc. Royal Soc. B122 (1937) 429–441. 422. Boyland, E., J.W. Gorrod, F.J.C. Roe, and B.V.C. Mitchley: The carcinogenicity of nitrosoanabasine, a possible constituent of tobacco smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 41 (1964) 64. 423. Boyland, E., F.J.C. Roe, and J.W. Gorrod: Induction of pulmonary tumours in mice by nitrosonornicotine, a possible constituent of tobacco smoke; Nature 202 (1964) 1126; Boyland, E., F.J.C. Roe, J.W. Gorrod, and B.V.C. Mitchley: The carcinogenicity of nitrosoanabasine, a possible constituent of tobacco smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 18 (1964) 265–272. 423a. Boyland, E. and F. Weigert: The metabolism of carcinogenic compounds; Brit. Med. Bull. 1947 (4) 354–359; Weigert, F. and J.C. Mottram: Intermediate stages in the metabolic conversion of benzopyrene to 8-hydroxybenzopyrene in mice; Biochem. J. 37 (1943) 497–501; The biochemistry of benzopyrene. I. A survey, and new methods of analysis; Cancer Res. 6 (1946) 97–108; The biochemistry of benzopyrene. II. The course of its metabolism and the chemical nature of the metabolites; Cancer Res. 6 (1946) 109–120. 423b. Bradford, J.A., W.R. Harlan, and H.R. Hanmer: Nature of cigaret smoke: Technic of experimental smoking; Ind. Eng. Chem. 28 (1936) 836–839. 424. Bradford, J.A., E.S. Harlow, W.R. Harlan, and H.R. Hanmer: Nature of cigaret smoke: Volatile bases and acids; Ind. Eng. Chem. 29 (1937) 45–50. 424a. Brandle, J.D. and D. Bai: Biotechnology: Uses and applications in tobacco improvement; Chapter 3 in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 49–65. 425. Brandt, W.: Tabak und Tabakrauch. Teil. I [Tobacco and tobacco smoke. Part I]; Chem. Zeit. 62 (1938) 841–843. 426. Brandt, W.: Tabak und Tabakrauch. Teil. II [Tobacco and tobacco smoke. Part II]; Chem. Zeit. 62 (1938) 851–852.
1277
427. Braun, K.: Zur Gehaltsbestimmung von Nikotin im Tabak und im Tabakrauch [Determination of nicotine content in tobacco and in tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 55 (1930) 354–355. 428. Braun, K.: Erfahrung bei der Nikotinbestimmung im Tabak und im Tabakrauch [Knowledge of the estimation of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 71 (1930) 209–213. 429. VOID. 429a. Bregeon, B., M. Coupe, and B. Gonny; HCN and tobacco precursors; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 35, 2006, p. 37. 429b. BRENDA: The comprehensive enzyme information system; see www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/show_ pathway?map00500+2.4.1.35; see also Kanehisa, M. and S. Goto: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG); Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 27–30; Enzymes, glycolysis, arginine and proline metabolism, fructose and mannose metabolism, pathways of Nicotiana); also Lyon, G.D.: Host pathogen interactions and crop protection: Metabolic pathways of the diseased potato; see www.scri.sari.ac.uk/publications/annualreports/98Indiv/21Metabo.pdf. 429c. BRENDA: The comprehensive enzyme information system, Entry of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (NADPH) (EC-Number 1.1.1.34), Nicotiana, KEGG Link 00100 Steroid Biosynthesis, see: www.genome.jp/ dbget-bin/show_pathway?map00100+1.1.1.34 429d. BRENDA: The Comprehensive Enzyme Information System Entry of histidinol-phosphate transaminase (ECNumber 2.6.1.9), Histidine metabolism pathway: http://www. genome.jp/dbget-bin/show_pathway?map00340+2.6.1.9. 429e. Brice, B.A.: Ultraviolet absorption spectra of nicotine, nornicotine, and some of their derivatives; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 4, 1948. 430. Briggs, C.D. and S.J.A. Hawthorne: Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke condensate; Proc. Anal. Div., Chem. Soc. 15 (1978) 181–184. 431. Bright, M.N., T.M. Larson, and C.I. Lewis: Analytical method for determination of pyrazine and alkylpyrazines in shredded tobacco; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 27, 1975, p. 22. 432. British Empire Cancer Campaign: Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 35 (1958) 303–305. 433. Britt, P.F., A.C. Buchanan iii, and C.V. Owens Jr: Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the gas-phase pyrolysis of terpenes and steryl esters at short residence times; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 20, 2001, p. 32. 434. Britt, P.F., A.C. Buchanan iii, and C.V. Owens Jr: Formation of nitrogen containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (aza-arenes) from the pyrolysis of Amadori compounds; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 46, 2001, p. 48. 435. Britt, P.F., A.C. Buchanan iii, C.V. Owens Jr, and T. Skeen: Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the gas phase pyrolysis of sterols: The role of residence time;
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1277
11/24/08 2:39:30 PM
1278
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
436.
437.
437a.
438.
439.
440.
441.
442.
443.
444.
445.
446.
447.
448.
54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 29, 2000, p. 35. Brosch, A.: Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Pathogenesis und Histogenesis der malignen Geschwülste [Theoretical and experimental investigation of the pathogenesis and histogenesis of malignant tumors]; Virchows Arch. Pathol. Anat. Physiol. 162 (1900) 32–84. Brown, B.G., J.T. Avalos, C.K. Lee, and D.J Doolittle: The effect of tobacco smoke, nicotine, and cotinine on the mutagenicity of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)1-butanol (NNAL); 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 10, 2001, p. 26. Brown, E.G. and F.M. Diffin: Biosynthesis and metabolism of pyrazole by Cucumis sativus: Enzymatic cyclization and dehydrogenation of 1,3-diaminopropane; Phytochemistry 29 (1990) 469–478. Brown, E.V.: Analysis of basic constituents of tobacco smoke; Proc. University of Kentucky Tobacco Hlth. Workshop 1 (1969) 79. Brown, E.V.: The question of nitrosamines in cigarette smoke tar; Proc. University of Kentucky Tobacco Hlth. Workshop 1 (1969) 80. Brown, E.V. and I. Ahmad: Investigations of the isolation and identification of the higher boiling heterocyclic nitrogen compounds in cigarette smoke; Proc. University of Kentucky Tobacco Hlth. Workshop 2 (1970) 124. Brown, E.V. and I. Ahmad: Alkaloids of cigarette smoke condensate; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 3485–3490. Brown, E.V., I. Ahmad, and A.J. Poole: Investigations of the identification and quantitative estimation of N-heterocyclic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; Proc. University of Kentucky Tobacco Hlth. Workshop 2 (1970) 124. Brown, E.V. and K.W. Yang: Investigations on detection, identification and quantitative determination of nitrosamines in cigarette smoke; Proc. University of Kentucky Tobacco Hlth. Workshop 2 (1970) 124. Brown, J.R. and A.A. Jarvis: The strontium-90 content of Canadian tobacco samples; Med. Serv. J. Canada 20 (1965) 613–615. Browne, C.L., C.H. Keith, and R.E. Allen: The effect of filter ventilation on the yield and composition of mainstream and sidestream smoke; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 16, 1978, p. 8; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper ST-01, 124; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 81–90. Browne, C.L. and S.M. Serad: The effect of the level of clove addition on the composition of smoke from kretek cigarettes; 9th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Guangzhou, China, 1988, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1988: Paper ST-3, 79. Browner, R.F., G.K.E. Copeland, P.B. Stockwell, and I. Bergman: Determination of carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke using an electro-chemical transducer; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 38–44. Browning, H.L. Jr and H.W. Patton: Determination of the stable free radicals in tobacco smoke condensate by electron magnetic resonance; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 24, 1966, p. 31; Manuscript (1967).
449. Brozinski, M., U. Dölberg, and G. Lipp: Untersuchungen über die Verteimung des Menthols auf Tabak, Filter und Rauch von Mentholcigaretten [The determination of menthol in tobacco, in filters, and in the smoke of mentholated cigarettes]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 124–130. 450. Brückner, H.: Die Biochemie des Tabaks [The biochemistry of tobaccos]; Paul Parey Publisher, Berlin (1936) pp. 235–236, 444. 451. Brückner, H.: Die Biochemie des Tabaks [The biochemistry of tobaccos]; Paul Parey, Berlin (1936). 452. Brugidou, C., I. Marty, Y. Chartier, and Y. Meyer: The Nicotiana tabacum genome encodes two cytoplasmic thioredoxin genes which are differently expressed; Molecular Gen. Genetics 238 (1993) 285–293. 453. Brümmer, U., C. Paulsen, G. Spremberg, F. Seehofer, V. Heemann, and V. Sinnwell: New cembranoids from burley tobacco; Z. Naturforsch. 36c (1981) 1077–1080. 454. Brunnemann, K.D.: Routine HPLC method for assessing sorbate in reconstituted tobacco; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 61, 1979, p. 33. 455. Brunnemann, K.D.: Volatile N-nitrosamines in sidestream smoke and indoor air; in: Environmental carcinogens: Methods of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 9: Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 81 (1988) 221–230. 456. Brunnemann, K.D. and J.D. Adams: Nicotine and minor alkaloids in sidestream smoke and indoor air; in: Environmental carcinogens: Methods of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 9: Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 81 (1988) 239–246. 457. Brunnemann, K.D., J.D. Adams, D.P.S. Ho, and D. Hoffmann: The influence of tobacco smoke on indoor atmospheres. II. Volatile and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in mainstream and sidestream smoke and their contribution to indoor pollution; Proc. 4th Joint Conf. on Sensing of Environmental Pollutants, New Orleans, LA, Am. Chem. Soc. (1977) 876–880. 458. Brunnemann, K.D., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Nonvolatile N-nitrosamines: Analysis in tobacco and tobacco smoke by HPLC-TEA; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 52, 1977, p. 27. 459. Brunnemann, K.D., J.E. Cox, and D. Hoffmann: Methods of analysis for tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in indoor air; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 50, 1991, p. 40. 460. Brunnemann, K.D., J.E. Cox, and D. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XCVII.] Analysis of tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines in indoor air; Carcinogenesis 13 (1992) 2415–2418. 461. Brunnemann, K.D., J.E. Cox, and D. Hoffmann: Determination of cadmium in cigarette smoke and its possible role as a biomarker; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 20, 1993, p. 30 . 462. Brunnemann, K.D., J.E. Cox, R. Kagan, and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of selected environmental tobacco smoke components in indoor air by thermal desorption-GC-MS; CORESTA 1990 Symp., Halithea, Greece, CORESTA Inf.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1278
11/24/08 2:39:30 PM
1279
Bibliography
463.
464.
465.
466.
467.
468.
469.
469a.
470.
471.
472.
473.
Bull., Spec. Edition, 1990: Paper S10, 216; Application of thermal desorption for the analysis of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 27, 1990, p. 24. Brunnemann, K.D., J.E. Cox, Y. Liu, and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of volatile and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco smoke by conventional method and by supercritical fluid extraction; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 22, 1992, pp. 33–34. Brunnemann, K.D., M.V. Djordjevic, R. Feng, and D. Hoffmann: Analysis and pyrolysis of some N-nitrosamino acids in tobacco and tobacco smoke; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 477–481. Brunnemann, K.D. and H. Enzmann: Application of the in ovo bioassay to tobacco research; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 26, 1999, pp. 33–34. Brunnemann, K.D., R. Feng, and D. Hoffmann: Pyrolysis studies of selected nitrosamino acids in cigarettes; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 44, 1989, p. 36. Brunnemann, K.D., W. Fink, and F. Moser: Analysis of volatile N-nitrosamines in mainstream and sidestream smoke by GLC-TEA; in: Risk assessment of N-nitroso compounds for human health, Symp. Proc., German Cancer Res. Center, Heidelberg (1979); Oncology 37 (1980) 217–222. Brunnemann, K.D., L. Genoble, and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosamines in chewing tobacco: An international comparison; J. Agr. Food Chem. 33 (1985) 1178–1181. Brunnemann, K.D., L. Genoble, and D. Hoffmann: Identification and analysis of a new tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-methylnitrosamino-4-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol; Carcinogenesis 8 (1987) 465–469. Brunnemann, K.D., N.J. Haley, J.D. Adams, D.W. Sepkovic, and D. Hoffmann: Model studies on the uptake of nicotine after exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 31, 1987, p. 28. Brunnemann K.D., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke with the aid of the thermal energy analyzer; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 38, 1976, p. 28. Brunnemann K.D., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosamines: Environmental occurrence, in vivo formation, and metabolism; 184th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Paper No. 34 (1982); J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 19 (1982) 661–668. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Gas chromatographic determination of ammonia in cigarette and cigar smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 53, 1974, p. 34. Brunnemann, K.D. and D. Hoffmann: On the pH of tobacco smoke; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26,
474.
475.
476.
477.
478.
479.
480.
481.
482.
483.
484.
485.
486.
Paper No. 11, 1972, pp. 16–17; The pH of tobacco smoke; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 12 (1974) 115–124. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXIV. A quantitative method for carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in cigarette and cigar smoke; J. Chromat. Sci. 12 (1974) 70–75. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXXIV. Gas chromatographic determination of ammonia in cigarette and cigar smoke; J. Chromat. Sci. 13 (1975) 159–163. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the respiratory environment; Carc. Comp. Serv. 1 (1976) 283–297. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LIX. Analysis of volatile nitrosamines in tobacco smoke and polluted indoor environments; in: Environmental aspects of N-nitroso compounds, edited by E.A. Walker, M. Castegnaro, L. Griciute, and R.E. Lyle, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 19 (1978) 343–356. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Concurrent gas chromatographic determination of volatile, nonvolatile, and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 33, 1981, p. 17. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Assessment of the carcinogenic N-nitrosodiethanolamine in tobacco products and tobacco smoke; Carcinogenesis 2 (1981) 1123–1127. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke, LXXIV.] Pyrolytic origins of major gas phase constituents of cigarette smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 8 (1982) 103–140. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosodiethanolamine in tobacco and mainstream and sidestream smoke; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6. N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, T. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 85–92. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: GC-TEA of N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) from tobacco products; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6. N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, T. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 399–402. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Analytical studies on tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 116 (Suppl. Pt. 2) (1990) 1087. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XCIII.] Analytical studies on tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 21 (1991) 235–240. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XC.] Decreased concentrations of N-nitrosodiethanolamine and N-nitrosomorpholine in commercial tobacco products; J. Agr. Food Chem. 39 (1991) 207–208. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XCVII.] Analytical studies on N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 17 (1991) 71–112.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1279
11/24/08 2:39:31 PM
1280
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
487. Brunnemann K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC: Paper No. 161 (1992). 488. Brunnemann, K.D., D. Hoffmann, C.G. Gairola, and B.C. Lee: Analysis of selected mainstream smoke components of low ignition propensity cigarettes; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 54, 1994, p. 58. 489. Brunnemann, K.D., D. Hoffmann, C.G. Gairola, and B.C. Lee: Low ignition propensity cigarettes: Smoke analysis for carcinogens and testing for mutagenic activity of the smoke particulate matter; Food Chem. Toxicol. 10 (1994) 917–922. 490. Brunnemann, K.D., D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: The fate of diethanolamine in tobacco and cigarette smoke; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 51, 1980, p. 26. 491. Brunnemann, K.D., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Studies on the inhalability of cigarette and cigar smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 27, 1973, p. 21. 492. Brunnemann, K.D., D. Hoffmann, E.L. Wynder, and G.B. Gori: Determination of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke. A comparison of international smoking conditions; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, 1975, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76–1221 (1976) 441–449. 493. Brunnemann, K.D., M.R. Kagan, J.E. Cox, and D. Hoffmann: Determination of benzene, toluene, and 1,3butadiene in cigarette smoke by GC-MSD; Exp. Pathol. 37 (1989) 108–113. 494. Brunnemann, K.D., M.R. Kagan, J.E. Cox, and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of 1,3-butadiene and other selected gas-phase components in cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke by gas chromatography-mass selective detection; Carcinogenesis 11 (1990) 1863–1868. 495 Brunnemann, K.D., M.R. Kagan, and D. Hoffmann: Analysis of selected gas phase components by GC-MSD; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 18. 1988, p. 25. 496. Brunnemann, K.D., H.-C. Lee, and D. Hoffmann: A study of the precursors and on the quantitative analysis of catechols in cigarette smoke; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 46, 1975, p. 31. 497. Brunnemann, K.D., H.C. Lee, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XLVII. On the quantitative analysis of catechols and their reduction; Anal. Lett. 9 (1976) 939–955. 498. Brunnemann, K.D., S.J. Lee, S. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Occurrence of N-nitrosamines in chewing tobacco: A closer look; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 26, 1984, p. 14. 499. Brunnemann, K.D., J. Masaryk, and D. Hoffmann: The role of tobacco stems on the formation of N-nitrosamines in tobacco and cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 6, 1983, p. 4; Role of tobacco stems on the formation of
500.
501.
502.
503.
504.
505.
506.
507.
507a.
508.
509.
510.
511.
N-nitrosamines in tobacco and cigarette mainstream and sidestream smoke: J. Agr. Food Chem. 31 (1983) 1221–1224. Brunnemann, K.D., R. Onrust, and D. Hoffmann: Determination of volatile carbonyl compounds in tobacco headspace and tobacco smoke; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 47, 1986, p. 25. Brunnemann, K.D., B. Prokopczyk, M.V. Djordjevic, J.E. Cox, and D. Hoffmann: The use of supercritical fluid extraction for the analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and in tobacco smoke; CORESTA 1992 Symp., Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1992 Spec. Edition: Paper ST10, 84. Brunnemann, K.D., B. Prokopczyk, M.V. Djordjevic, and D. Hoffmann: Formation and analysis of tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 26 (1996) 121–137. Brunnemann, K.D., B. Prokopczyk, D. Hoffmann, J.H. Nair, H. Ohshima, and J. Bartsch: Laboratory studies on oral cancer and smokeless tobacco; Banbury Report No. 23, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1986) 197–213. Brunnemann, K.D., J. Qi, L.P. Bush, and D. Hoffmann: Alkaloid profile in oral moist snuff tobacco; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 41, 2001, p. 44. Brunnemann, K.D., J. Qi, G.N. Connolly, and D. Hoffmann: Effects of storage on the levels of tobaccospecific nitrosamines in oral moist snuff tobacco; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 40, 2001, pp. 43–44. Brunnemann, K.D., J. Qi, and D. Hoffmann: Analytical comparisons of two types of oral snuff; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 40, 2000, pp. 41–42. Brunnemann, K.D., J. Qi, D. Hoffmann, and G.N. Connolly: Levels of TSNA in oral moist snuff in the past 30 years and today; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 38, 2004, pp. 43–44. Brunnemann, K.D., A. Rivenson, J.D. Adams, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: A study of snuff carcinogenesis; IARC Sci. Publ. 84 (1987) 457–459. Brunnemann, K.D., A. Rivenson, A. Czech, E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Isolation, identification, and bioassay of the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine 4-methylnitrosamino-4-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 29 (1988) 84. Brunnemann, K.D., J.C. Scott, N.J. Haley, and D. Hoffmann: Endogenous formation of N-nitrosoproline upon cigarette smoke inhalation; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relationship to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 819–828. Brunnemann, K.D., J.C. Scott, and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosomorpholine and other volatiles N-nitrosamines in snuff tobacco. Carcinogenesis 3 (1982) 693–696. Brunnemann, K.D., J.C. Scott, and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosoproline: An indicator for N-nitrosation of amines in processed tobacco. J. Agr. Food Chem. 31 (1983) 905–909.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1280
11/24/08 2:39:31 PM
Bibliography
512. Brunnemann, K.D., G. Stahnke, and D. Hoffmann: Volatile pyridines: Quantitative analysis in main- and sidestream smoke of cigarettes and cigars. 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 36, 1977, p. 19; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXI. Volatile pyridines. Quantitative analysis in mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes and cigars; Anal. Lett. 7 (1978) 545–560. 513. Brunnemann, K.D., L. Yu, and D. Hoffmann: Gas chromatographic determination of hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen in tobacco smoke; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 36, 1976, p. 21; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XLIX. Gas chromatographic determination of hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen in tobacco smoke; J. Anal. Toxicol. 1 (1977) 38–42. 514. Brunnemann, K.D., L. Yu, and D. Hoffmann: Assessment of carcinogenic volatile N-nitrosamines in tobacco and mainstream and sidestream smoke from cigarettes; Cancer Res. 37 (1977) 3218–3222. 515. Bruzel, A.R. and I. Schmeltz: Qualitative studies of pyrolysis of diphenylamine, carbazole, acridine and nicotine at 1050°C; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 44–46. 516. Buechley, R.W.: Cigarettes, arsenic and lung cancer; 8th Internat. Cancer Cong., Moscow, USSR (1962). 517. Bugler, J.H. and A.G. Britton: The transfer of D.D.T. into the mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigars; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 8, 1971, p. 6. 518. Bugler, J.H. and A.B. Haish: Determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in tobacco and tobacco condensate using a two column clean up procedure; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 7, 1970, p. 6. 519. Bundesantstalt für Tabakforschung in Forchheim bei Karlsruhe, Ann. Rept.; Establishment of scopoletin as control substance for the testing of selective filter effect; Ann. Rept. (1964) 14–15. 520. Burdick, D., J. F. Benner, and H.R. Burton: Apparent correlations between thermogravimetric data and constituents in smoke from treated tobaccos; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 28, 1968, p. 20. 521. Burdick, D., J.F. Benner, and H.R. Burton: Thermal decomposition of tobacco. IV. Apparent correlations between thermogravimetric data and certain constituents in smoke from chemically-treated tobaccos; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 138–141. 522. Burdick, D. and H.R. Burton: Thermal decomposition of tobacco. II. Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analyses of pigments from tobacco leaf and smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 16–18. 523. Burdick, D., W.J. Chamberlain, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XIX. Steam-volatile neutral substances in smoke of cigarettes having different organoleptic properties; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 82–85. 524. Burdick D, I. Schmeltz, R.C. Miller, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XIV. Steam-volatile, neutral substances in various types and grades; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 97–100. 525. Burdick, D. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XV. Steam-volatile, neutral substances in smoke from blended and unblended cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 113–117.
1281
526. Burdick, D., R.L. Stedman, and I. Schmeltz: Distribution of steam-volatile acidic substances in cigarette smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 14, 1963, p. 12. 527. Burgan, J.G.: The manufacturers’ contribution to experimental research on smoking and lung cancer; Trans. Assoc. Ind. Med. Officers 9 (1959) 13–17. 527a. Burk, L.G. and T.C. Tso: Effects of giberellic acid on Nicotiana plants; Nature 181 (1958) 1672–1673. 528. Burney, L.E.: Governmental responsibility in environmental health; Publ. Hlth. Rpt. 76 (1961) 291–295. 529. Burns, D.: Testimony in Washington State vs. Philip Morris, R. J. Reynolds, etc. (1988). 529a. Burrows, I.E. and A.J. Lindsey: Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by pyrolysis of simple aliphatic hydrocarbons; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1961) 1395. 530. Burton, F.G., J.T. Veal, and D.W. Phelps: Analysis of cigarette tars using fluorescent spectroscopy; Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., New Orleans, LA: Paper No. 51 (1977). 531. Burton, H.R.: Thermal analyses of chemically-treated tobacco; Proc. University of Kentucky Tobacco Hlth. Workshop Conf. Rpt. 1 (1969) 33–38. 532. Burton, H.R.: The thermal decomposition of tobacco and modified tobaccos. V. Thermal analytical studies on chemically-treated tobaccos; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 39, 1973, p. 27. 533. VOID 534. Burton, H.R.: Thermal decomposition of tobacco. V. Influence of temperature on the formation of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 78–83. 535. Burton, H.R.: Thermal decomposition and gas phase analysis of carbohydrates found in tobacco; in: Thermal uses and properties of carbohydrates and lignins, edited by F. Shafizadeh, K.V. Sarkanen, and D.A. Tillman, Academic Press, New York, NY (1976) 257–310. 536. Burton, H.R.: Gas phase constituents from the thermal decomposition of leaf extracts and modified tobaccos; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 52, 1978, p. 28. 537. Burton, H.R.: Quantitative differences in steam volatile constituents from tobacco at harvest and after air-curing; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 10, 1989, p. 18. 538. Burton, H.R., J.F. Benner, and D. Burdick: Thermal analysis of chemically treated tobacco; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 27, 1968, p. 20. 539. Burton, H.R., J.F. Benner, and D. Burdick: Temperature profiles of tobacco and tobacco constituents. Yields of phenol and cresols from untreated and borate-treated cellulose and lignin; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 19, 1969, p. 12. 540. Burton, H.R., J.F. Benner, and D. Burdick: Thermal decomposition of tobacco. III. A classification of chemically-treated tobacco using thermogravimetric analysis; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 134–137. 541. Burton, H.R. and D. Burdick: Thermal decomposition of tobacco. I. Thermogravimetric analysis. Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 180–185.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1281
11/24/08 2:39:31 PM
1282
542. Burton, H.R. and L.P. Bush: Accumulation of tobaccospecific nitrosamines during curing and aging of tobacco; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC: Paper No. 157 (1992). 543. Burton, H.R., L.P. Bush, and M.V. Djordjevic: Influence of temperature and humidity on the accumulation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in stored burley tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 37 (1989) 1372–1377. 543a. Burton, H.R., L.P. Bush, and J.L. Hamilton: Effect of curing on the chemical composition of burley tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 9 (1983) 91–153. 544. Burton, H.R. and G.H. Childs Jr: Influence of atmosphere on the gas phase constituents formed during the thermal decomposition of tobacco; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 28, 1974, p. 21. 545. Burton, H.R. and G.H. Childs Jr: The thermal decomposition of tobacco. VI. Influence of temperature on the formation of some low molecular weight products; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 40, 1973, p. 27; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 174–180. 546. Burton, H.R. and G.H. Childs Jr: Thermal decomposition of tobacco. VII. Influence of atmosphere on the formation of gas phase constituents; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 45–52. 547. Burton, H.R., G.H. Childs Jr, R.A. Andersen, and P.D. Fleming: Changes in chemical composition of burley tobacco during senescence and curing. 3. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines; J. Agr. Food Chem. 37 (1989) 426–430. 548. Burton, H.R., N.K. Dye, and L.P. Bush: Distribution of nitrogen constituents within air-cured tobacco leaf; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 13, 1991, p. 19. 549. Burton, H.R., N.K. Dye, and L.P. Bush: Distribution of tobacco constituents in tobacco leaf tissue. 1. Tobaccospecific nitrosamines, nitrate, nitrite, and alkaloids; J. Agr. Food Chem. 40 (1992) 1050–1055. 550. Burton, H.R., N.K. Dye, and L. Walton: Differences in composition of air-cured burley tobacco using modified field curing structures. 1. Changes in nitrogenous constituents; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 34, 1993, p. 40. 551. Burton, H.R. and M.J. Kasperbauer: Changes in chemical composition of tobacco lamina during senescence and curing. 1. Plastid pigments; J. Agr. Food Chem. 33 (1985) 879–883. 552. Burton, H.R., E. Leggett, and R.E. Phillips: Factors influencing the concentration of solanesol in burley tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 313–320. 553. Burton, H.R. and X. Wei: Distribution of tobacco constituents within the leaf tissue. 2. Oxidized nicotine derivatives; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 31, 1994, p. 42. 554. Burton, H.R., X. Wei, and W.S. Caldwell: Identification and quantification of tobacco-specific nitrosamine precursors in air-cured tobacco; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 33, 1993, pp. 39–40. 555. Burton, H.R. and H.E. Wright Jr: Burley tobacco: The effects of harvesting and curing procedures on the composition of the cured leaf; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 49–53.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
555a. Bush, L.P.: Physiology and biosynthesis of tobacco alkaloids; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 7 (1981) 75–106. 555b. Bush, L.P.: Leaf chemistry. B. Alkaloid biosynthesis; Chapter 8B in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 285–291. 556. Bush, L.P., H.R. Burton, N. Dye, and N. Nicholas: Postharvest treatment affects on TSNA accumulation; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 30, 1994, p. 41–42. 557. Bush, L.P., M. Cui, H. Shi, H.R. Burton, F.F. Fannin, L. Lei, and N. Dye: Formation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in air-cured tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 27 (2001) 23–46. 557a. Bush, L.P. and J.L. Saunders: Accumulation, manipulation, and regulation of nicotine content in tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 389–425. 558. Bush, L.P., J.L. Sims, and W.O. Atkinson: Volatile nitrogenous bases and secondary amines of burley tobacco; Canadian J. Plant Sci. 50 (1970) 289–294. 559. Bush, L.P. and T.C. Tso: Physiologie und Biochemie der Tabakpflanze. 1. Wachstum und Entwicklung [Physiology and biochemistry of the tobacco plant. I. Growth and development]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 197–209. 560. Buser, H.: Wasserbestimmung im Rauchkondensat nach Karl Fischer mit einer halbautomatischen Apparatur [The determination of the water content in cigarette smoke condensate using a Karl Fischer titrator]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 264–267 561. Busse, R.F.: A biochemical assay of cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 35, 1966, pp. 45–47. 562. Buyske, D.A., J.M. Flowers, P. Wilder Jr, and M.E. Hobbs: Nicotinic and glutamic acids, nicotinamide, and glutamine in cigarette tobacco smoke; Science 124 (1956) 1080–1081. 563. Buyske, D.A. and M.E. Hobbs: Some organic acids of tobacco smoke; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 17, 1956, pp. 11–12. 564. Buyske, D.A., L.H. Owen, P. Wilder Jr, and M.E. Hobbs: Chromatography of the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones of some aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 910–913. 565. Buyske, D.A., P. Wilder Jr, and M.E. Hobbs: Volatile organic acids of tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 29 (1957) 105–108. 566. Byrd, G.D., K.W. Fowler, and M.F. Borgerding: Comparison of selected compounds in the mainstream vapor phase smoke of a reference cigarette and a new cigarette that heats rather than burns tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42 Paper No. 55, 1988, p. 44. 567. Byrd, G.D., K.W. Fowler, R.D. Hicks, M.E. Lovette, and M.F. Borgerding: Mainstream vapor phase smoke comparison of a 1R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarette and a new cigarette that heats rather than burns tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 54, 1988, p. 44.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1282
11/24/08 2:39:31 PM
1283
Bibliography
568. Byrd, G.D., K.W. Fowler, R.D. Hicks, M.E. Lovette, and M.F. Borgerding: Isotope dilution gas chromatographymass spectrometry in the determination of benzene, toluene, styrene, and acrylonitrile in mainstream cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 503 (1988) 359–368. 568a. Byrd, G.D. and M.W. Ogden: Development of an LC-MS/MS method for determination of solanesol in cigarette butts; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 5, 2005, p. 22. 568b. Byrd, G.D., J.N. Schumacher, M.F. Borgerding, K.W. Fowler, M.E. Lovette, and R.A. Lloyd Jr: Expansion of the tobacco/smoke mass spectral library; R&DM, 1989, No. 251, September 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510169784 -9832. 568c. Cahoon, E.B. and J.B. Ohlrogge: Metabolic evidence for the involvement of a D-4-palmitoyl-acyl carrier protein desaturase in petroselinic acid synthesis in coriander endosperm and transgenic tobacco cells; Plant Physiol. 104 (1994) 827–837. 569. Caldwell, W.S.: High resolution NMR characterization of the product of the reaction of levulinic acid and propylene glycol: 3-(2,4-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl)propionic acid; RDM, 1991, No. 233, May 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508208544 -8556. 570. Caldwell, W.S.: High resolution NMR study of the reaction of levulinic acid and propylene glycol in water: Evidence against levulinic acid decomposition and ketal formation; RDM, 1991, No. 234, May 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508208557 -8566. 571. Caldwell, W.S., G.D. Byrd, K.M. Chang, W.M. Greene, M.S. Uhrig, J.D. deBethizy, B.S. Bhatti, R.M. Riggs, and P.A. Crooks: Synthesis and characterization of [N-(B-Dglucuronopyranosyl)-(S)-(-)cotinium] uronate inner salt; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 31, 1991, p. 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 522276130 -6156. 572. Caldwell, W.S. and J.M. Conner: An improved method for the determination of volatile and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke; R&DM, 1988, No. 38, January 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507037832 -7851. 573. Caldwell, W.S. and J.M. Conner: Artifact formation during smoke trapping. An improved method for the determination of N-nitrosamines in cigarette smoke; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 45, 1989, p. 37, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512918317 -8317; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 73 (1990) 783–789. 574. Caldwell, W.S. and D.W. Eaker: Evaluation of bis(diethyldithiocarbamoyl)iron ii as a filter additive for removal of nitric oxide from cigarette smoke; R&DM, 1990, No. 155, July 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514924797 -4823. 575. Caldwell, W.S., J.M. Greene, G.P. Dobson, and J.D. deBethizy: Intragastric nitrosation of nicotine is not a significant contributor to nitrosamine exposure; in: Tobacco smoking and nutrition: Influence of nutrition on tobaccoassociated health risks, edited by J.N. Diana and W.A. Pryor, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 686 (1992) 213–228, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514892394 -2401. 576. Caldwell, W.S., J.M. Greene, D.R. Plowchalk, and J.D. deBethizy: The nitrosation of nicotine: A kinetic study; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 4 (1991) 513–516, see www.rjrtdocs.
577.
578.
579.
580.
581.
582.
583.
584.
585.
586. 587.
588.
589.
590.
591.
com 510279138 -9141; Caldwell, W.S., D.R. Plowchalk, and J.D. deBethizy: The nitrosation of nicotine: A kinetic study; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 22, 1990, p. 22; Caldwell, W.S., J.M. Greene, and J.D. deBethizy: Kinetics and mechanism of nicotine nitrosation; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC (1992) Paper No. 31. Camarotti, A.J.: Densitometric determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigar tobacco smoke; Mem. Inst. Biochem. Univ. Fed. PE., Recife 1 (1974) 119–128. Campbell, D.R.: Determination of nicotine on cigarette filters or Cambridge pads; RDM, 1978, No. 6, February 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607457 -7465. Campbell, J.A.: The effects of exhaust gases from internal combustion engines and of tobacco smoke upon mice, with special reference to incidence of tumours of the lung; Brit. J. Exp. Pathol. 17 (1936) 146–158. Campbell, J.A.: Cancer of the skin and increase in incidence of primary tumours of the lung in mice exposed to dust from tarred roads. Brit. J. Exp. Pathol. 18 (1937) 287–294. Campbell, J.A.: Carcinogenic agents present in the atmosphere and incidence of primary tumours in mice; Brit. J. Exp. Pathol. 20 (1939) 122–132. Campbell, J.K., J.W. Rhoades, and A.L. Gross: Acetonitrile as a constituent of cigarette smoke; Nature 198 (1963) 991–992. Campbell, J.M. and A.J. Lindsey: Polycyclic hydrocarbons extracted from tobacco. The effect upon total quantities found in smoking; Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 649–652. Campbell, J.M. and A.J. Lindsey: Polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigar smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 11 (1957) 192–195. Campos, M.P.A. and J.R.P. da Silva: The role of radiation and temperature on tobacco carotenoids; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 27, 1994, p. 39. Candeli, A., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Unpublished data cited in Wallace et al. (1987) 373. Candeli, A., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Unpublished 1963 data cited in E. L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see 323–333; also cited in E. L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see 373–374, Table VIII-14. Candeli, A., A.J. Lindsey, and K. Persaud: Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; Anal. Chim. Acta 22 (1960) 458–461. Candeli, A., A.J. Lindsey, and K. Persaud: Carta di sigarette al sulfammato di ammonio e idrocarburi cancerigeni [Cigarette paper containing ammonium sulfamate and carcinogenic hydrocarbons]; Bol. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 36 (1960) 452–454. Cano, J.P., J. Catalin, R. Badré, C. Dumas, A. Viala, and R. Guillerm: Détermination de la nicotine par chromatographie en phaze gaseuse. II. Applications [Determination of nicotine by gas chromatography. II. Applications]; Ann. Pharmaceut. Franc. 28 (1970) 633–640. Canon, A.B. and M.S. Frank: The determination of certain C1-C4 aldehydes in cigarette smoke using high pressure liquid chromatography; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1283
11/24/08 2:39:32 PM
1284
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
592. 593.
594.
595.
596.
597.
598.
599.
600.
601.
602.
603.
604.
605.
606.
Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 37, 1978, p. 20. Cardon, S.Z.: 3,4-Benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 130–131. Cardon, S.Z. and E.T. Alvord: The presence of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; Ann. Mtg., Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Atlanta GA (December 27, 1955), pp. 1–12. Cardon, S.Z., E.T. Alvord, W.J. Rand, and R. Hitchcock: 3,4-Benzpyrene in the smoke of cigarette paper, tobacco, and cigarettes. Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 485–497. Carmella, S.G. and S.S. Hecht: High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the nicotine derived nitrosamines, N’-nitrosonornicotine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK); Anal. Biochem. 145 (1985) 239–244. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Subfractionation of the weakly acidic fraction of cigarette smoke condensate by preparative high pressure liquid chromatography; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 42, 1978, p. 23. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Quantitative analysis of alkyl-2-hydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-ones in tobacco smoke; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 54, 1979, p. 29. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Precursor studies on catechol in cigarette smoke; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 50, 1981, p. 26. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, J.J. Lam, and T.C. Tso: Effects of carboxymethylation of tobacco fiber on smoke catechol levels; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 40, 1983, p. 22. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: The formation of catechol in cigarette smoke; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 30, 1980, p. 16. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: Cellulose and modified cellulose as precursors to catechol in cigarette smoke; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 39, 1982, p. 21. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: Roles of tobacco cellulose, sugars and chlorogenic acid as precursors to catechols in cigarette smoke; J. Agr. Food Chem. 32 (1984) 267–273. Carmines, E.L.: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 1: Cigarette design, testing approach, and review of results; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 77–91. Caroff, J., J. Véron, R. Badré, and R. Guillerm: Qualitative analysis of light hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; J. Gas Chromatog. 2 (1964) 320–322. Caroff, J., J. Véron, R. Badré, and R. Guillerm: Direct chromatography of the gas phase of cigarette smoke: Hydrocarbons and compounds containing oxygen and nitrogen; J. Gas Chromatog. 3 (1965) 196–201. Carpenter, B.J. and B.E. Frost: The transfer of organochlorine pesticide residues from tobacco to smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program
606a.
606b.
607.
608.
609.
610.
611.
612.
613.
614.
615.
616.
617.
618.
619.
Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 23, 1969, p. 14. Carpenter, R.D.: Benzo[a]pyrene content of cigarette smoke – Comparison of PM Commander, Marlboro, and Winston; Memorandum to A. Bavley, May 30, 1964, see www.pmdocs.com 1001532767 /2768. Carpenter. R.D., R.W. Jenkins Jr, R.H. Newman, and T.S. Osdene: Cigarette smoke formation studies. I. distribution and mainstream products from added 14Cdotriacontane-16,17; February 1972, Philip Morris document, Bates Numbers HK0703073 /3089, see http:// legacy.library.ucsf.edu/cgi/getdoc?tid=csa2aa00&fmt= pdf&ref=results. Carpenter, R.D., W.J. Martin, and R.B. Seligman: Quantitative determination of glycerine in cigarette smoke; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 17, 1958, p. 7. Carpenter, R.D. and R.B. Seligman: The determination of acids and bases in cigarette smoke. III. The determination of total bases; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 3, 1955, p. 2. Carpenter, R.D. and B.R. Warner: The determination of acids and bases in cigarette smoke. II. The determination of strong acids; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 2, 1955, p. 2. Carroll, M.F.: Ketene may be present in tobacco smoke and be at least one of the causative agents of the observed bronchial symptoms of smokers, and possibly also of lung cancer; Biochem. J. 92 (1964) Back Cover. Carruthers W.: Chemical investigations of cigarette smoke; Med. Res. Council, Ann. Rpt., April 1965-March 1966: 172. Carruthers, W. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Phytosterols in cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1958) 1663–1664. Carruthers, W. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Composition of a paraffin wax fraction from tobacco leaf and tobacco smoke; Nature 184 (1959) 1131–1132. Carruthers, W. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Alcohols of tobacco: Solanesol and n-docosanol; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1960) 867–868. Carruthers, W. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Some phenolic constituents of cigarette smoke; Nature 185 (1960) 762–763. Carruthers, W., R.A.W. Johnstone, and J.R. Plimmer: Gas liquid partition chromatography of mixtures of aryl methyl ethers; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1958) 331. Carruthers, W., R.A.W. Johnstone, and J.R. Plimmer: Low boiling components of cigarette smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 12, 1961, p. 6. Cartwright, W., A. Cornell, and V.S. Olender: Development of methodology for the determination of bromide residues in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Factors affecting the residue levels resulting from methyl bromide fumigation; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 40, 1981, p. 21. Carugno, N.: Determination of paraffin waxes of tobacco and tobacco smoke by gas-liquid chromatography; in: Symposium: Analysis of carcinogenic air pollutants,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1284
11/24/08 2:39:32 PM
Bibliography
620.
621.
622.
623.
624.
625.
626.
627.
628.
629.
630.
630a.
631.
632.
633.
edited by E. Sawicki and K. Cassel, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 171–181. Carugno, N. and G. Giovannozzi-Sermanni: Analytical investigations on tobacco by means of vapour phase chromatography. 1. Some components of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Il Tabacco 62 (1958) 255–264. Carugno, N. and G. Giovannozzi-Sermanni: Recherches analytiques sur le tabac par chromatographie en phase gazeuse. Note I. Quelques substances gazeuses qui composent la fumée des cigarettes [Analytical research on tobacco by gas chromatography. Note I. Several gaseous compounds in tobacco smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium (1959) 501–506. Carugno, N., M. Neri, and G. Lionetti: Quantitative determination of free and protein-bound amino acids of tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1974) 222–227. Carugno, N. and M.A. Perinelli: Determination of trace metals in cigarette smoke by atomic absorption spectrometry; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 176. Carugno, N. and S. Rossi: Evaluation of polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke by glass capillary columns; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 36, 1965, pp. 49–51. Carugno, N. and S. Rossi: Evaluation of normal, branched paraffin hydrocarbons and some unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke by glass capillary columns; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 555–562; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 972–978. Carugno, N. and S. Rossi: Evaluation of polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke by glass capillary columns. J. Gas Chromatog. 5 (1967) 103–106. Carugno, N., S. Rossi, and G. Lionetti: Gaschromatographic determination of the trimethylsilyl derivatives of polyhydric humectants in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 79–83. Case, P.D.: The build-up and decay of ambient cigarette smoke components; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 46, 1985, p. 25. Casey, W.J. and J.V. Fiore: Identification of cellulose fibers isolated from reconstituted tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 302–313. Casey, W.J. and T.A. Perfetti: Chemistry of Turkish tobacco; R&DM, 1981, No. 4, February 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508856214 -6237. Casey, W.J. and T.A. Perfetti: Colorimetric determination of ammonia in tobacco; RDM, 1979, No. 36, September 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507990670 -0690. Cashmore, M.: Alternative smoking regimes: Hoffmann analyte formation and prediction as a consequence of changing smoking regimes and filter vent blocking; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 29, 2002, pp. 35–36. Castonguay, A. and H. Van Vanukis: Radioimmunoassay of N’-nitrosonornicotine; Anal. Biochem. 95 (1979) 387–396. Castaño, J.I., L.A. Cabezas, and F.J. Palacio: Determination of vanillin, ethylvanillin, and coumarin in cigarette filler: An SPE-HPLC approach; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 54, 1990, p. 39.
1285
634. Castaño, J.I., L.R. Vargas, and J.W. Flórez: Determination of nonvolatile and fatty acids in tobacco by microwave accelerated reaction and gas chromatography; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 32, 2004, p. 40. 635. Caton, J.E., M.P. Maskarinec, and G.M. Henderson, Separation and determination of harman and norharman by liquid chromatography; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 55, 1979, p. 30. 636. Caton, J.E., J.R. Stokely, and M.R. Guerin: Depletion of constituents in contained smoke aerosols for inhalation exposure dosimetry; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 50, 1975, p. 33. 636a. Cautreels, W. and K. van Cauwenberghe: Determination of organic compounds in airborne particulate matter by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Atmos. Environ. 10 (1976) 447–457. 637. Cavalli, A.: Über die Verbrennungsprodukte des Tabaks [On the combustion products of tobacco]; Selmi 8 (1898) 25. 638. Cederlöf, R. and M.L. Edfors: Tjär och nikotinmängden i cigarrettrök [Tar and nicotine amounts in cigarette smoke]; Nord. Hyg. Tidskr. 45 (1964) 83–88. 639. Celanese Fibers Marketing Company: Analysis of total organic volatiles in cigarette smoke; Celanese Fibers Marketing Company Bulletin No. 57 (July 1965) pp. 1–15. 640. Celanese Fibers Marketing Company: The selectivity number: An expression of selective filtration of cigarette smoke; Celanese Fibers Marketing Company Bulletin No. 56 (March 1966) pp. 1–16. 641. Celanese Fibers Marketing Company: Cytrel® smoking material; Celanese Fibers Marketing Company Bulletin No. 57 (March 1969). 642. Celanese Fibers Marketing Company: Chemical and biological properties of Cytrel® smoking products; Celanese Fibers Marketing Company, Product Bulletin (April 1974). 642a. Center for Disease Control (CDC): Endosulfan: 4. Production, import/export, use, and disposal; pp. 181– 185, see www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp41-c4.pdf. 643. Ceschini, P. and D. Cham: Effect of sampling conditions on the composition of the volatile phase of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1974) 294–301. 644. Ceschini, P. and R. Chauchaix: Comparative study of organochlorine residues in the smoke with various blend and filter types; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 187–188; Transfer of organochlorine pesticide residues into cigarette smoke as a function of tobacco blends and filter types; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 134–138. 645. Ceschini, P. and A. Lafaye: Evolution of the gas-vapour phase and the total particulate matter of cigarette smoke in a single puff; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 378–381. 646. Chakraborty, B.B., K.D. Kilburn, and R.E. Thornton: Reduction in the concentration of aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1971) 672. 646a. Chakraborty, B.B. and R.E. Thornton: Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons; Report No. RD 609-R, October 9, 1966, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/boo99e00, Bates No. 655041108 /1184.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1285
11/24/08 2:39:32 PM
1286
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
647. Chakraborty, M.K. and J.A. Webrew: The chemistry of tobacco trichomes; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 122–127. 648. Chamberlain, W.J.: Chromatographic studies on a polar lipid fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 47, 1975, p. 32; Polar lipid materials in cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 161–163. 649. Chamberlain, W.J. and R.F. Arrendale: Rapid method for the analysis of volatile N-nitrosamines in cigarette smoke by glass capillary chromatography; J. Chromatog. 234 (1982) 478–481. 650. Chamberlain, W.J. and R.F. Arrendale: An alternate method for the analysis of N`-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 31 (1983) 909–911. 651. Chamberlain, W.J., J.L. Baker, and R.F. Arrendale: A rapid method for the determination of N`-nitrosonornicotine in cigarette smoke by glass capillary gas chromatography; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 32, 1981, p. 17. 652. Chamberlain, W.J., J.L. Baker, and O.T. Chortyk: Characterization of an oxygenated neutral fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 50, 1979, p. 27. 653. Chamberlain, W.J., J.L. Baker, O.T. Chortyk, and M.G. Stephenson: N-Nitrosamine formation in tobacco; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 23, 1985, p. 12. 654. Chamberlain, W.J., J.L. Baker, O.T. Chortyk, and M.G. Stephenson: Studies on the reduction of nitrosamines in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 81–82. 655. Chamberlain, W.J. and O.T. Chortyk: Effects of curing and fertilization on nitrosamine formation in bright and burley tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 15 (1992) 87–92. 656. Chamberlain, W.J., O.T. Chortyk, J.L. Baker, and T.G. Sutton: Curing effects on contents of tobacco specific nitrosamines in bright and burley tobaccos; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 53, 1987, p. 40 657. Chamberlain, W.J., O.T. Chortyk, J.E. Leggett, and T.G. Sutton: Effect of air-curing vs. flue-curing on the concentration of tobacco specific nitrosamines in tobacco; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 8, 1986, p. 5. 658. Chamberlain, W.J., R.L. Miller, and R.L. Stedman: Pilot studies on the composition of a polynuclear-enriched fraction of smoke condensate; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 18, 1968, p. 11. 659. Chamberlain, W.J., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and O.T. Chortyk: Chemical composition of nonsmoking tobacco products; J. Agr. Food Chem. 36 (1988) 48–50. 660. Chamberlain, W.J., R.F. Severson, and M.G. Stephenson: Levels of N-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco grown under various agronomic conditions; Tob. Sci. 28 (1984) 156–158. 661. Chamberlain, W.J., M.E. Snook, J.L. Baker, and O.T. Chortyk: Gel permeation chromatography of oxygenated components of cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chim. Acta 111 (1979) 235–241.
662. Chamberlain, W.J., M.E. Snook, O.T. Chortyk, and J.L. Baker: Characterization of an aryl nitrile fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 15–17. 663. Chamberlain, W.J., M.E. Snook, and A.F. Haeberer: Characteristics of a polar neutral fraction of cigarette smoke condensate by gel filtration chromatography; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 41, 1977, p. 21; Analysis of a tumor-inhibiting fraction of tobacco smoke condensate; J. Anal. Toxicol. 2 (1978) 138–140. 664. Chamberlain, W.J., M.E. Snook, D.B. Walters, and R.L. Stedman: Isolation of phenols and phenolic acids from cigarette smoke condensate; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 39, 1976 p. 28. 665. Chamberlain, W.J. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXIV. High molecular weight pigment in smoke of various tobaccos; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 17, 1966, p. 21; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 162–163. 666. Chamberlain, W.J. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXVIII. 2,3,6-Trimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone in cigarette smoke; Phytochemistry 7 (1968) 1201–1203. 667. Chamberlain, W.J., M.G. Stephenson, and R.F. Severson: Levels of alkaloids and N’-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco grown under different agronomic conditions; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 13, 1983, p. 8. 668. Chamberlain, W.J., D.B. Walters, M.E. Snook, O.T. Chortyk, and F.J. Akin; Fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate for biological testing: Concentration of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon and weak-acid fractions; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 133–135. 669. Chamberlain, W.J., R.E. Williamson, R.F. Severson, J.L. Baker, and O.T. Chortyk: Determination of free and bound solanesol in tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 42, 1988, p. 38. 669a. Chamot, D. and C. Kuhlemeier: Differential expression of genes encoding the hypusine-containing translation initiation factor, eIF-5A, in tobacco; Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (1992) 665–669. 670. Chan, W.G. and W.P Hempfling: Chemiluminescence detection of nitric oxide for the analysis of total N-nitroso compounds in tobacco; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 86, 1999, pp. 67–68. 671. Chang, K.W., W.W. Weeks, and J.A. Weybrew: Changes in surface chemistry of tobacco leaves during curing with particular emphasis on trichomes; Tob. Sci. 29 (1985) 122–127. 672. Chang, M.J., R.L. McDaniel, J.D. Naworal, and D.A. Self: A unique method for the determination of mercury in mainstream cigarette smoke using two-stage amalgamation cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 38, 2001, p. 42. 673. VOID 674. Chang, N.C. and R.P. Collins: An analysis of the flower oil of Nicotiana alata; Flavour Ind. 3 (1972) 569–571. 675. Chang, S.Y. and C. Grunwald: Duvatrienediol, alkanes, and fatty acids in cuticular wax of tobacco leaves of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1286
11/24/08 2:39:32 PM
1287
Bibliography
676.
677.
677a.
677b.
678.
679.
680.
681.
682.
683.
683a.
683b.
684.
685.
685a.
685b.
various physiological maturity; Phytochemistry 15 (1976) 961–963. Chang, S.Y. and C. Grunwald: Duvatrienediols in cuticular wax of burley tobacco leaves; J. Lipid Res. 17 (1976) 7–11. Chang, Y.P., P.X. Chen, F.K. St. Charles, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Influence of tip ventilation on Hoffmann analyte deliveries; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 44, 2003, pp. 45–46. Chaplin, J.F.: Genetic influence on chemical constituents of tobacco leaf and smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 233–240. Chaplin, J.F. and G.S. Miner: Production factors affecting chemical components of the tobacco leaf; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 6 (1980) 3–63. Chaplin, J.G. and H.W. Spurr Jr: Quantification of tar and nicotine from selected tobacco cultivars (topped and not topped) when flue-cured; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 13. 1975, p. 15. Chaplin, J.G. and H.W. Spurr Jr: Altering condensate levels in tobacco smoke by genetic techniques; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 151–160. Chapman, J.C., A.J. Dyakonov, and C.A. Little: Effect of combustion modifiers on phenolics and carbonyl compounds delivered in mainstream smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 72, 2004, pp. 66–67. Charles, J.L., H.M. Stahr, and R.M. Ikeda: Automated determination of nicotine in total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 54–58. Chatterjee, R.K., P. Banerji, N.N. Ghosh, and S.D. Chatterjee: Radium content of tobacco ash; Sci. Cult. (Calcutta) 31 (1965) 188–189. Cheely, C., T. Hefner, C. Smith, and S.C Moldoveanu: Analysis of nitro-PAHs in mainstream smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 44, 2004. pp. 47–48. Chemicalland21: GIBBERELLIN A4+A7; see www. chemicalland21.com/lifescience/agro/GIBBERELLIN%20A4+A7.htm. Chen, C.B., S.S. Hecht, N. Hirota, D. Hoffmann, R.M. Ornaf, and T.C. Tso: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines: Formation from nicotine in vitro and during tobacco curing and carcinogenicity in Strain A mice; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60 (1978) 819–824. Chen, C.B., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: A study of chemical carcinogenesis. XI. Metabolic A-hydroxylation of the tobacco-specific carcinogen N’-nitrosonornicotine; Cancer Res. 38 (1978) 3639–3645. Chen, C.B., S.S. Hecht, E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Denitrosation of tobacco specific nitrosamines by A-hydroxylation: an approach to their reduction in tobacco; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 48, 1978, p. 26. Chen, C.-G., E.C. Cornish, and A.E. Clarke: Specific expression of an extensin-like gene in the style of Nicotiana alata; The Plant Cell 4 (1992) 1053–1062. Chen, L., T.P.J. Garrett, G.B. Fincher, and P.B. Høj: A tetrad of ionizable amino acids is important for catalysis
686. 687.
688.
689.
689a.
690.
691. 692.
693.
694.
695.
696.
697.
698.
699.
700.
701.
in barley B-glucanases; Am. Soc. Biochem. Molec. Bio. 270 (1995) 8093–8101. Chen, P.: Chemistry of cigarette burning process; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 105–110. Chen, P.X., H. Burton, and S.C. Moldoveanu: A collaborative study for the analysis of minor alkaloids in tobacco; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 33, 2003, p. 39. Chen, P.X. and S.C. Moldoveanu: Mainstream smoke chemical analyses for 2R4F Kentucky reference cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 448–458. Chen, P.X., N. Qian, H.R. Burton, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of minor alkaloids in tobacco: A collaborative study; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 369–379. Chen, Z., J. Malamy, J. Henning, U. Conrath, P. Sanchez-Casas, H. Silva, J. Riciglianoi, and D.F. Klessig: Induction, modification, and transduction of the salicylic acid signal in plant defense responses; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 4134–4137. Cheng, A.L.S., J.F. Chaplin, and T.C. Tso: Sterol variation in flue-cured tobacco varieties; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 33–34. Cheng, A.L.S. and G.L. Steffens: Maleic hydrazide residues in Maryland tobacco; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 75–76. Cheng, T., C.D. Eaton, X. Shi, H.M. Coburn, and R.D. Bereman: Quantitative determination of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 79, 2003, pp. 68–69. Cheng, T., C.D. Eaton, X. Shi, H.M. Coburn, D.F. Price, and R.D. Bereman: Quantitative determination of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; Manuscript, December (2004). Cheng, T., N. Hawkins , J. Allen, V. Ding, and J.M. Keefer: Two PAH specific separation schemes for the determination of numerous PAHs from mainstream cigarette smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 26, 2001, p. 35. Chengming, Z.: The determination of B[a]P in the total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 51, 2000, p. 48. Chenikov, V.V. and E.N. Shapovalov: Separation of the components of the neutral fraction of tobacco tars; Tabak (USSR) 25(1) (1964) 43–46. Chenikov, V.V. and E.N. Shapovalov: Tar components of tobacco and the products of its burning. I; Izv. Vyssikh Uchebn. Zavednii. Pish. Tekhnol. 1965(5) (1966) 65–66. Chenikov, V.V. and E.N. Shapovalov: Tar components of tobacco and the products of its burning. II; Izv. Vyssikh Uchebn. Zavednii. Pish. Tekhnol. 1965(5) (1966) 66–69. Chernova, M.: Synthesis of polycyclic compounds. II. S.N.Reformatsky’s reaction with 9-methyl-1,2benzanthrone-10; J. Gen. Chem. (U.S.S.R.) 9 (1939) 2171–2172. Chesterfield, J. and I.D. Entwhistle: Methods for the separation of cigarette smoke hydrocarbons; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 24, 1963, pp. 17–18. Chibnall, A.C., S.H. Piper, A. Pollard, E.F. Williams, and P. Sahai: The constitution of the primary alcohols, fatty
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1287
11/24/08 2:39:33 PM
1288
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
701a.
702. 702a.
703.
704.
705.
706.
707.
708.
709.
710.
711.
712.
acids and paraffins present in plant and insect waxes; Biochem. J. 28 (1934) 2189–2208. Chida, M., Y. Sone, and H. Tamura: Aroma characteristics of stored tobacco cut leaves analyzed by a high vacuum distillation and canister system; J. Agr. Food Chem. 52 (2004) 7918–7924. Chmura, M.I.: Characteristics of Nicotiana species; Sborn. Rabot Khim. Tabak Bull. 125 (1935) 151–162. Choi, D., H.M. Kim, H.K. Yun, J.-A. Park, W.T. Kim, and S.H. Bok: Molecular cloning of a metallothioneinlike gene from Nicotiana glufinosa l. and its induction by wounding and tobacco mosaic virus infection; Plant Physiol. 112 (1996) 353–359. Chopra, N.M.: Breakdown of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides in tobacco smokes: A short review; in: Proc. 2nd Internat. Cong. Fate of pesticides in the environment, 6 (1972) 245–261. Chopra, N.M.: On pyrolysis, and the possible contribution of maleic hydrazide towards benzo(a)pyrene in tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 23 (1979) 29–30. Chopra, N.M. and A. Al-Kubaisi: A study of the pyrogenesis of PAHs in cigarette smoke: Pyrolysis of benzene, naphthalene, and B-sitosterol; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper S14, 54–55. Chopra, N.M., B.S. Campbell, and J.C. Hurley: Systematic studies on the breakdown of endosulfan in tobacco smokes. Isolation and identification of the degradation products from the pyrolysis of endosulfan I in a nitrogen atmosphere; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 255–258. Chopra, N.M. and J.J. Domanski: Degradation of p,p’DDT in tobacco smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 25, 1969, p. 19; Systematic studies on the breakdown of p,p’-DDT in tobacco smokes. III. Isolation and identification of the nonvolatile degradation products of p,p’-DDT in p,p’-DDT-treated tobacco smokes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 139–143. Chopra, N.M., J.J. Domanski, and N.B. Osborne: Systematic studies on the breakdown of p,p’-DDT in tobacco smokes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 167–174. Chopra, N.M. and N.B. Osborne: Isolation and identification of the degradation products from the pyrolysis of p,p’-DDT in a nitrogen atmosphere; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 24, 1969, p. 18. Chopra, N.M., A.V. Rao, and M.M. Verma: Study on the pyrogenesis of PAH’s in cigarette smoke: Pyrolysis of 1,3-butadiene + ethylene mixture in a nitrogen atmosphere; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper PP02, 124–125. Chopra, N.M. and L.R. Sherman: Degradation of p,p’DDT in tobacco smokes. Part II. The identification and estimation of volatile degradation products of p,p’-DDT in p,p’-DDT-treated tobacco smokes; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 43, 1970, p. 24. Chopra, N.M. and L.R. Sherman: Systematic studies on the breakdown of p,p’-DDT in tobacco smokes. Investigation into the presence of methyl chloride, dichloromethane, and chloroform in tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 1036–1038.
713. Chopra, N.M. and J.T. Thekkekandam: Estimation of nonvolatile degradation products of p,p’-DDT and p,p’-TDE in the smoke from p,p’-DDT-treated and p,p’-TDE-treated tobaccos; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol 26, Paper No. 31, 1972, pp. 47–48. 714. Chopra, N.M. and J.T. Thekkekandam: A mechanistic study on the formation of the non-volatile degradation products of p,p’-DDT and p,p’-TDE in p,p’-DDT- and p,p’-TDE-treated tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 88–92. 715. Chopra, N.M. and M.M. Verma: On the transfer of maleic hydrazide into tobacco smoke; 7th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Manila, The Philippines, 1980, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1980: Paper S04 120. 716. Chopra, N.M., M.M. Verma, and T.H. Zuniga: On the fate of maleic hydrazide in tobacco smokes; J. Agr. Food Chem. 30 (1982) 672–676. 717. Chopra, N.M. and T.H. Zuniga: The fate of Chlorpyrifos on tobacco during smoking; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1990) 387–391. 718. Chortyk, O.T.: Comparative studies on the brown pigments of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 137–139. 719. Chortyk, O.T.: High molecular weight materials of tobacco; in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972), pp. 21–33. 720. Chortyk, O.T. and W.J. Chamberlain: The application of solid phase extraction in the analysis of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA); 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 44, 1990, p. 33. 721. Chortyk, O.T., J.F. Chaplin, and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Growing selenium-enriched tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 32 (1984) 64–68. 722. Chortyk, O.T. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Studies on the pyrogenesis of tobacco smoke constituents (a review); Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 165–178. 723. Chortyk, O.T. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Modification of an automatic cigarette smoking machine for sidestream smoke collection; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 122–126. 724. Chortyk, O.T. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Increasing selenium in cigarettes and smoke: Transfer to smoke; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 39 (1984) 419–424. 724a. Chortyk, O.T. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Yield and chemical composition of sidestream smoke produced by a low-tar cigarette; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 14, 1988, p. 23; The contribution of low-tar cigarettes to environmental tobacco smoke; J. Anal. Toxicol. 13 (1989) 129–134. 725. Chortyk, O.T., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and R.L. Stedman: Lithium chloride as a gas chromatographic substrate for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Gas Chromat. 3 (1965) 394–395. 725a. Chortyk, O.T., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and R.L. Stedman: The pyrolysis of polyphenolic pigments of tobacco; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 18, 1965, pp. 27–29. 726. Chortyk, O.T., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXIII. Pyrolytic and structural investigations on the polyphenol-amino acid pigments of leaf; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 422–429.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1288
11/24/08 2:39:33 PM
Bibliography
727. Chortyk, O.T., R.F. Severson, and H.C. Higman, Chromatographic determination of hydrocarbon waxes in tobacco leaf and smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 34, 1974, p. 24; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 204–210. 728. Chou, D., K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: On the isolation and identification of new tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 22, 1985, p. 12. 729. Christakopoulos, A., H. Norin, K. Feldhusen, A. Palmqvist, and I. Wahlberg: Estimation of natural levels of coumarin in different types of tobacco using a mass fragmentographic technique; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 45, 1991, p. 37. 730. Christakopoulos, A., A. Palmqvist, and I. Wahlberg: A new analytical method for the determination of nitrite in nanogram levels in tobacco; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 39, 1993, p. 45. 731. Chuman, T.: Chemical studies on aroma constituents of Turkish tobacco; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 119 (1977) 45–92. 732. Chuman, T., H. Kaneko, T. Fukuzumi, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of two terpenoid acids 4-isopropyl-7-methyl-5E,7-octadienoic acid and 3-isopropyl-6-methyl-4E,6-heptadienoic acid from Turkish tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 38 (1974) 2295–2296. 733. Chuman, T., H. Kaneko, T. Fukuzumi, and M. Noguchi: Acidic aroma constituents of Turkish tobacco: Terpenoid acids related to tobacco thunberganoids; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 587–581. 734. Chuman, T., H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: Structure of a new terpenoid acid, 1-Xi-methyl-3-Xi-isopropylcyclopentane-1-Xi, 2-Xi-dicarboxylic acid; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 203–204. 735. Chuman, T. and M. Noguchi: Isolation of a new terpenoid acid 2-methyl-5-isopropyl-1-cyclopentene-1-carboxylic acid from Turkish tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 39 (1975) 567–568. 736. Chuman, T. and M. Noguchi: Isolation of new terpenoid acids (-)-3-methyl-6-isopropyl-9-oxo-2E,4E-decadienoic acid and 3-isopropyl-6-oxo-2Z-heptenoic acid from Turkish tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 39 (1975) 1169–1171. 737. Chuman, T. and M. Noguchi: The structure of a new terpenoic acid, 6(S)-isopropyl-3-methyl-3-hydroxy-9-oxo4E-decenoic acid, isolated from Turkish tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 1793–1796. 738. Chuman, T. and M. Noguchi: Acidic aroma constituents of Turkish tobacco. Agr. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 1021–1030. 739. Chuman, T., M. Noguchi, A. Ohkubo, and S. Toda: The structure of a novel terpenoid acid, 3X-hydroxy-4X,9dimethyl-6E,9E-dodecadienedioic, isolated from Turkish tobacco; Tetrahedron Lett. (1978) 3045–3058. 739a. Chung, F.L. and Y. Xu: Inhibition of tobacco-specific nitrosamine lung tumorigenesis by green tea and its polyphenol as antioxidants; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC (1992) Paper No. 129. 739b. Chung, H.-J., G.-C. Jang, and Y.-O. Kim: Moisture sorption and desorption characteristics by tobacco type; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 13, 2005, pp. 25–26.
1289
740. Chung, H.L.: Pyrolytic study of leaf alcohol glucoside. RDM, 1991, No. 597, August 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509734205 -4208. 741. Chung, H.L. and J.C. Aldridge: Thermal study of levulinic acid; R&DM, 1991, No. 512, August 16, see www. rjrtdocs.com 511537672 -7676. 742. Chung, H.L. and J.C. Aldridge: Thermal study of sorbic acid; R&DM, 1991, No. 513, August 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511537677 -7681. 743. Chung, H.L. and J.C. Aldridge: Thermal study of licorice; ACD, 1992, No. 259, September 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508392999 -3005; Thermal study of licorice by online thermogravimetry/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 7, 1999, p. 23. 744. Chung H.L., J.C. Aldridge, M.F. Ogden, and C.H. Risner: Thermal study of solanesol by thermogravimetry/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and pyrolysis/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; R&DM, 1991, No. 481, May 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507984345 -4366. 745. Chung, H.L. and M.F. Borgerding: An online automated smoking machine/GC/MS system for analysis and puffby-puff study of fresh mainstream vapor phase smoke constituents; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 5, 2004, pp. 23–24. 746. Church, D.F. and W.A. Pryor: Free-radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its toxicological implications; Environ. Hlth. Perspect. 64 (1985) 111–126. 746a. Ciaravolo, S., G. Lionetti, M. Gionti, A. Nunziata, and E. Pierri: Microwave-assisted extraction: An efficient method for the determination of polycyclic hydrocarbons in particulate phase mainstream cigarette smoke; 2004 CORESTA Congress, Kyoto, Japan, Poster SS10; Microwave-assisted extraction: An efficient method for the determination of polycyclic hydrocarbons in particulate phase mainstream cigarette smoke; Manuscript, May (2005). 746b. Ciaravolo, S., G. Lionetti, F. Modestia, and A. Nunziata: Speciation of chromium in mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy; Manuscript, May (2005). 746c. Ciaravolo, S., F. Modestia, and L. Nappi: Analytical procedures for the determination of volatile nitrosamines in cigarette smoke; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 43, 2005, p. 41. 747. Cigarette Components, Ltd.: The determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke; Cigarette Components, Ltd. Pamphlet: pp. 1–8 (March, 1964). 748. Cigarette Components, Ltd.: Method for the determination of formaldehyde and acrolein in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke; Cigarette Components, Ltd. Pamphlet: pp. 1–4 (March 1964). 749. Clapp, W.L.: Protein reduction in tobacco. Part III. Burley tests; R&DM, 1988, No. 336, December 21, see www. rjrtdocs.com 511764189 -4205. 750. Clapp, W.L.: Protein determination in tobacco; R&DM, 1990, No. 24, January 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508381493 -1500. 751. Clapp, W.L.: The contribution of individual amino acids to the Ames activity of cigarette smoke condensate; R&DM, 1991, No. 58, April 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508353939 -3947.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1289
11/24/08 2:39:33 PM
1290
752. Clapp, W.L.: A status report on protein reduction studies; R&DM, 1991, No. 154, April 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508353926 -3938. 753. Clapp, W.L. and B.S. Fagg: Protein reduction in tobacco; R&DM, 1988, No. 128, May 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510906974 -7001. 754. Clapp, W.L. and B.S. Fagg: Protein reduction in tobacco. Part II. Extract evaluation; R&DM, 1988, No. 257, September 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511764175 -4188. 755. Clapp, W.L., B.S. Fagg, and C.J. Smith: Reduction in Ames Salmonella mutagenicity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate by tobacco protein removal; Mutation Res. 446 (1999) 167–174. 756. Clapp, W.L., B.S. Fagg, C.J. Smith, and D. Peele: The reduction in Ames Salmonella mutagenicity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate by tobacco protein removal; 39th Tobacco Workers Conference, Williamsburg, VA (2000). 757. Clapp, W.L., B.M. Gordon, and F.N. Wendelboe: Determination of ethyl carbamate in tobacco products; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 77, 1996, p. 67. 758. Clapp, W.L. and G.R. Shelar: Determination of chlorinated pesticides in mainstream smoke; RDM, 1972, No. 30, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615633 -5638. 759. Clapp, W.L., F.A. Thome, and C.E. Lewis: Gaschromatographic determination of chlorinated pesticide residues on tobacco; RDR, 1972, No. 7, April 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501002646 -2677. 760. Clar, E.: Zur Kenntnis mehrkerniger aromatischer Kohlenwasserstoffe und ihrer Abkömmlinge. I. Dibenzanthracene und ihrer Chinone [Knowledge of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives. I. Benzanthracene and its quinone]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 62 (1929) 350, 1378. 761. Clark, M.S.G., M.J. Rand, and S. Vanov: Comparison of the pharmacological activity of nicotine and related alkaloids occurring in cigarette smoke; Arch. Int. Pharm. 156 (1965) 363–379. 762. Clark, T.J., J.W. Gee, H.L. Chung, and M.F. Borgerding: Evaluation of artifact formation in mainstream vapor phase cigarette smoke trapped in solvent; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 26, 1998, p. 27. 763. Clark, T.J. and J.E. Bunch: Derivatization/headspace techniques for the analysis of organic acids in tobacco; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 41, 1996, p. 44. 764. Clarke, B.B. and E. Brennan: Tobacco leaves accumulate cadmium from root application of the heavy metal; Tob. Sci. 27 (1983) 28–29. 764a. Clayton, P. and M. Lane: Measurement of carbonyl compounds in cigarette mainstream smoke by LC-MS/ MS following derivatization; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 31, 2006, pp. 33–34. 765. Clemo, G.R.: Some aspects of the chemistry of tobacco smoke. I; Tetrahedron 3 (1958) 168–174. 766. Clemo, G.R.: Symposium on atmospheric pollution. (a) Some aspects of the chemistry of cigarette smoke and its possible implications; Royal Soc. Hlth. J. 79 (1959) 74–80.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
767. Clemo, G.R.: Further aspects of the chemistry of tobacco smoke. II; Tetrahedron 11 (1960) 11–14. 768. Cochran, E.W., M.J. Joseph, S.S. Stinson, and S.S. Summers: Application of a diffusion-denuder method for the investigation of the effects of “smoke pH” on vaporphase nicotine yields from different types of cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 365–372. 769. Cogbill, E.C. and M.E. Hobbs: The transfer of metallic constituents to the mainstream smoke; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 68–73. 770. Cogbill, E.C., W.B. Wartman, and E.S. Harlow: Cigarette smoke. II. Some variables affecting the water content of the particulate phase; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 136–138. 770a. Coggins, C.R.E., R.K. Haroz, R. Lam, and K.T. Morgan: The tumorigenicity of smoke condensates from cigarettes containing different amounts of Cytrel®, as assessed by mouse skin painting; Toxicology 23 (1982) 177–185. 770b. Coggins, C.R.E., R. Lam, and K.T. Morgan: Chronic inhalation study in rats, using cigarettes containing different amounts of Cytrel® tobacco supplement; Toxicology 22 (1981–1982) 287–296. 771. Cohen, B., M. Eisenbud, and W. Harley: Alpha radioactivity in cigarette smoke; Radiation Res. 14 (1980) 190–196. 772. Colby, D.A.: Application of liquid chromatography to the quantitative analysis of nonvolatile tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco products; RDM, 1980, No. 10, March 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617571 -7578. 773. Colby, D.A.: Analysis of sorbitol in chewing tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 50, December 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618921 -8930. 774. Colby, D.A. and G.R. Shelar: Analysis of coumarin in tobacco products; RDM, 1979, No. 10, March 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500608263 -8268. 774a. Cole, D.L. and J.S. Cole: Field control of sore shin (Rhizoctoniua solani) of tobacco with Benomyl® and Benodanil®; Ann. Applied Biol. 90 (1978) 187–193. 775. Coleman, W.M. III: Gas chromatographic-selected ion monitoring-mass spectrometric determination of cigarette mainstream smoke components with sensory attributes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 175–183. 776. Coleman, W.M. III and B.M. Gordon: On the development of a very rapid gas chromatographic method for the analysis of high molecular weight hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 348–354. 777. Colledge, A., W.W. Reid, and R. Russell, The diterpenoids of Nicotiana species and their potential technological significance; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1975) 570–571. 778. Collins, P.F., N.M. Sarji, W.W. Lawrence, and J.F. Williams: An automated method for the determination of total aldehydes in gas phase of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 182–186. 779. Collins, P.F., N.M. Sarji, and J.F. Williams: An automated method for determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 10, 1969, p. 7; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 12–15. 780. Collins, P.F., N.M. Sarji, and J.F. Williams: A trapping system for the combined determination of total HCN and total gas phase aldehydes in cigarette smoke; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1290
11/24/08 2:39:33 PM
Bibliography
781.
782.
783.
783a.
783b.
784.
785.
786.
787.
788.
789.
789a.
790.
Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 20, 1972, pp. 30–31; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 73–78. Collins, P.F. and J.F. Williams: An automated procedure for CO in cigarette smoke, using a 20-port syringe smoking machine; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 19, 1972, pp. 28–30; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 67–72. Collins, P.F. and J.F. Williams: A unified smoking-automated colorimetric system for the analysis of gas phase of cigarette smoke and its application to the determination of hydrogen sulfide; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 60, 1978, p. 33; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1979) 24–30. Collins, P.F., J.F. Williams, and B.H. Gerritsen: An automated method for the determination of nitrate in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 75–78. Colucci, A.V. and N.W. Sizemore: Fate of smoke constituents in animals. I. Comparison of method of administration on the distribution of 14C from phenol-14C, palmitic acid-14C, and nicotinic acid-14C in the rat; RDR, 1968, No. 29, July 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500968938 -8999; Fate of smoke constituents in animals. II. Comparison of method of administration on the distribution of 14C from phenol-14C in the rabbit; RDM, 1968, No. 59, October 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500604283 -4298. Colucci, A.V., N.W. Sizemore, and C.W. Nystrom: Preliminary studies on the tissue distribution of activity from U-C14 phenol administered to rabbits by three different routes; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 39, 1969, p. 18; for complete presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504218940 -8952. Commins, B.T.: Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during pyrolysis and combustion of hydrocarbons; Atmos. Environ. 3 (1969) 565–572. Commins, B.T., R.L. Cooper, and A.J. Lindsey: Polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 8 (1954) 296–302. Commins, B.T. and A.J. Lindsey: The determination of phenols by chromatography and spectrophotometry of their methyl ethers. I. Ultraviolet absorption spectra of methyl aryl ethers in cyclohexane; Anal. Chim. Acta 15 (1956) 446–450. Commins, B.T. and A.J. Lindsey: The determination of phenols by chromatography and spectrophotometry of their methyl ethers. II. The separation and quantitative determination of methyl aryl ethers; Anal. Chim. Acta 15 (1956) 551–554. Commins, B.T. and A.J. Lindsey: The determination of phenols by chromatography and spectrophotometry of their methyl ethers. III. The determination of phenols in wood smoke; Anal. Chim. Acta 15 (1956) 554–556. Commins, B.T. and A.J. Lindsey: The determination of phenols by chromatography and spectrophotometry of their methyl ethers. IV. The determination of phenols in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chim. Acta 15 (1956) 557–558. Commins, B.T. and A.J. Lindsey: Some phenolic constituents of tobacco smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 504–506. Committee on Pyrene and Selected Analogues, Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazards: Hydrocarbons: Evaluation of sources and effects; The National Academies Press (1983) p.383.
1291
790a. Commoner, B., A.J. Vithayathil, P. Dolara, S. Nair, P. Madyastha, and G.C. Cuca: Formation of mutagens in beef and beef extract during cooking; Science 201 (1978) 913–916. 790b. Conant, J.B. and L.F. Fieser: Reduction potentials of quinones. II. The potentials of certain derivatives of benzoquinone, naphthoquinone and anthraquinone; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 46 (1924) 1858–1881. 790c. Conkling, M.A., C. H. Opperman, G.N. Acedo, and W. Song: Nematode-resistant transgenic plants; U.S. Patent No. 6,008,436 (December 28, 1999). 790d. Conkling, M.A., C.H. Opperman, and C. Taylor: Pathogen-resistant transgenic plants; U.S. Patent No. 5,750,386 (December 5, 1998). 790e. Conkling, M.A. and Y.T. Yamamoto: Root specific gene promoter; U.S. Patent No. 5,459,252 (October 17, 1995). 791. Connor, W.M. and E.H. Hess: The determination of calcium in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 21–24. 792. Constantinescu, T.: A study of the influence of B-pyridine alkaloids from tobacco on the taste and aroma of tobacco; Lucr. Cercet. Inst. Cercet. Proiect. Aliment. 10 (1972) 257–268. 793. Cook, J.W.: Chemical carcinogens and their significance; Lancet 1957(i) 333–335. 794. Cook, J.W.: Chemistry of cancerogenic substances with special reference to lung cancer; Chem. Ind. (1957) 1282–1288. 796. Cook, J.W.: Tobacco and lung cancer; Royal Inst. Chem. Lecture Ser. 1961(5) 1–18. 796a. Cook, J.W., C.L. Hewitt, and I. Hieger: Coal-tar constituents and cancer; Nature 130 (1932) 926. 797. Cook, J.W., C.L. Hewitt, and I. Hieger, Isolation of a cancer-producing hydrocarbon from coal tar. II. Isolation of 1,2- and 4,5-benzpyrenes, perylene, and 1,2-benzanthracene; J. Chem. Soc. (1933) 395–398. 798. Cook, J.W., R.A.W. Johnstone, and P.M. Quan: The composition of cigarette smoke. VIII. Some aromatic hydrocarbon constituents; Israel J. Chem. 1 (1963) 356–364. 799. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXIII. A- and B-Levantenolide from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 21, April 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188099 -8109. 800. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXV. 12A-Hydroxy-13-epimanoyl oxide from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 44, September 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188070 -8079. 801. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The composition of cigarette smoke. VIII. A- and B-Levantenolide from Turkish tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 32–33. 802. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXVI. Phytone (hexahydrofarnesyl acetone) and solanone (2-methyl-5-isopropyl-1,3-nonadien-8-one) from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 30, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965931 -5939. 803. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The composition of cigarette smoke. XIV. Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (phytone) and 2-methyl-5-isopropyl-1,3-nonadien-8-one (solanone) from Turkish tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 137–139. 804. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The effect of Purafil® on cigarette smoke; RDM, 1966, No. 74, November 18 [Paper XXXIX in Smoke Study series], see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188980 -8982.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1291
11/24/08 2:39:33 PM
1292
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
805. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The effect of some tetravalent metals on cigarette smoke; RDM, 1967, No. 36, July 17 [Paper XL in Smoke Study series], see www.rjrtdocs. com 521188983 -8988. 806. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The effect of citric acidtreated tobacco and filter tips on cigarette smoke; RDM, 1967, No. 53, September 14 [Paper XLII in Smoke Study series] see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613496 -3501. 807 Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: Evaluation of Scott Industrial Urethane Foam as a filter-tip material; RDM, 1967, No. 54, September 14 [Paper XLIII in Smoke Study series], see www.rjrtdocs.com 508844048 -4050. 808. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The effect of A-, B-, and G-cyclodextrins on cigarette smoke composition; RDM, 1967, No. 55, September 14 [Paper XLIV in Smoke Study series], see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189004 -9007. 809. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XLV. Branch-chained acids from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1967, No. 32, October 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189008 -9021. 810. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XLVI. Geranyl acetone and farnesyl acetone from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1967, No. 39, October 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189022 -9032. 811. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XLVII. Isolation of a lactone fraction from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDM, 1967, No. 68, October 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613614 -3622. 812. Cook, L.C., A. Rodgman, and G.W. Young: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XVI. Normal, long-chained primary alcohols; RDR, 1960, No. 22, July 1, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500934833 -4847; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 6–10. 813. Cooper, E.A., F.W.M. Lamb, E. Sanders, and E.L. Hirst: The role of tobacco smoking in the production of cancer; J. Hyg. (London) 32 (1932) 293–300. 814. Cooper, J.T., W.F. Forbes, and J.C. Robinson: Free radicals as possible contributors to tobacco-smoke carcinogenesis; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 191–197. 815. Cooper, P.J.: Oxides of nitrogen in fresh cigarette smoke; RDM, 1978, No. 15, June 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607678 -7698. 816. Cooper, P.J. and R.B. Hege Jr: The oxidation of NO to NO2 in cigarette smoke; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 34, 1978, p. 18, for complete presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500259224 -9247. 817. Cooper, R.L., J.A.S. Gilbert, and A.J. Lindsey: Polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke: The contribution made by the paper; Brit. J. Cancer 9 (1955) 442–445. 818. Cooper, R.L. and A.J. Lindsey: The presence of polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1953) 1205. 819. Cooper, R.L. and A.J. Lindsey: The presence of 3,4-benzpyrene and other polycyclic hydrocarbons in the combustion products of cigarette paper; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1954) 1260–1261. 820. Cooper, R.L. and A.J. Lindsey: 3,4-Benzpyrene and other polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 9 (1955) 304–309. 821. Cooper, R.L., A.J. Lindsey, and R.E. Waller: The presence of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1954) 1418.
822. Corbaz, R., A. Artho, P. Ceschini, M. Häusermann, and J.-C. Plantefève: Herbicide residues in tobacco leaves and their transfer into the smoke. Urea herbicides Patoran® and Molipan®. Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 80–91. 822a. CORESTA: Guide No.1: The concept and implementation of agrochemical guidance residue levels; December 2003, see www.coresta.org/Guides/Guide-No1-GRLs. pdf. 823. CORESTA: Standard Method No. 12: Determination of alkaloids in cigarette smoke condensate; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1969(2) 7–8. 824. CORESTA: Recommended Method No. 7: Determination of nicotine in the mainstream smoke of cigarettes by gas chromatographic analysis; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1986(3/4) 39–41. 825. CORESTA: Recommended Method No. 8: Determination of water in the mainstream smoke of cigarettes by gas chromatographic analysis; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1987(2) 21–23. 825a. CORESTA Recommended Method No. 58: Determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette mainstream smoke - gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method; February, 2004. 826. CORESTA: Recommended Method No. 15: Cigarettes— determination of water in smoke condensates—Karl Fischer method; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1990(2) 11–16. 826a. Cornell, A., W.F. Cartwright, and T.A. Bertinuson: Influence of microorganisms (fermentation) on the chemistry of tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 5 (1979) 27–62. 827. Cornell, A., W. Cartwright, and V.S. Olender: Sidestream/ mainstream (SS/MS) distribution ratios of ammonia and volatile pyridines in cigar smoke. Influence of cigar components and smoking regimen; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 37, 1977, p. 19. 828. Cornell, A., W. Cartwright, and V.S. Olender: Sidestream/ mainstream (SS/MS) distribution ratios of steam volatile phenols in cigarette and cigar smoke; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 43. 1978, p. 23. 828a. Cosgrove, J.P., E.T. Borish, D.F. Church, W.A. Deutsch, and W.A. Pryor: The metal-mediated formation of hydroxy radical by aqueous extract of cigarette smoke; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 132 (1985) 390–396. 828b. Couch, J.F.: Rutin – a new drug; 1st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 1, Paper No. 7, 1947. 829. Coulson, C.A.: Electronic configuration and carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 1 (1953) 1–56. 830. Coultson, F.: Overall view of the conference; in: Human epidemiology and animal laboratory correlations in chemical carcinogenesis, edited by F. Coultson and P. Shubik, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ (1980) 395–402. 830a. Court, W.A.: High-performance liquid chromatography of tobacco and tobacco smoke components; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 12 (1986) 143–184. 831. Court, W.A., M.R. Binns, and J.G. Hendel: Examination of the influence of curing and stalk position on the phenolic constituents of flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 27 (1983) 51–55.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1292
11/24/08 2:39:34 PM
1293
Bibliography
832. Court, W.A., J.M. Elliot, and J.G. Hendel: Influence of applied nitrogen fertilization on certain lipids, terpenes, and other characteristics of flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 28 (1984) 69–72. 833. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Determination of nonvolatile organic and fatty acids in flue-cured tobacco by gas-liquid chromatography; J. Chromat. Sci. 16 (1978) 314–317. 834. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Phenolic constituents of flue-cured tobacco at different stages of plant growth; Tob. Sci. 29 (1985) 73–76. 835. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Characteristics of flue-cured tobacco grown under varying proportions of ammonium and nitrate fertilization; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 20–22. 836. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Capillary gas chromatography of nonvolatile organic acids, fatty acids, and certain carbohydrates in flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 56–59. 837. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Determination of solanesol in flue-cured tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; Tob. Sci. 31 (1987) 79–81. 838. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Influence of removing lower leaves and topping height on agronomic and chemical characteristics of flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 33 (1989) 15–17. 839. Court, W.A. and J.G. Hendel: Nonvolaile organic acids of flue-cured tobacco as affected by production practices; Tob. Sci. 33 (1989) 91–95. 840. Court, W.A., J.G. Hendel, and R. Pocs: Fractionation of flue-cured tobacco samples using SEP-PAK cartridges; Tob. Sci. 35 (1991) 59–64. 841. Courtney, J.L. and S. McDonald: A new C20-A,B-unsaturated aldehyde (3,7,13-trimethyl-10-isopropyl-2,6,11,13tetradecatetraen-1-al) from tobacco; Tetrahedron Lett. (1967) 459–466. 841a. Cousins, A.R.: Nitrogen complexes in tobacco; Chem. Ind. (1972) 19–20. 842. Cousins, A.R. and W.B. Fordyce: The polysaccharides of flue-cured tobacco; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 36, 1963, p. 24. 843. Crabtree, H.G.: Some effects of aromatic hydrocarbons on sulfur metabolism and tumor induction in mice; Cancer Res. 6 (1946) 553–559. 844. Crabtree, H.G.: Anticarcinogenesis; Brit. Med. Bull. 4 (1947) 345. 845. Creamer, R.M.: A new method for the determination of nitric oxide in smoke; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 3, 1968, p. 3. 846. Creamer, R.M., H.J. Grubbs, and L.E. Brown: The water vapor content of cigarette smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 13, 1974, p. 14. 847. VOID 848. Creasy, P.J. and M.J. Saxby: Steam volatile acids of Latakia tobacco leaf; Phytochemistry 8 (1969) 2427–2429. 848a. Criqui, M.C., Y. Parmentier, A. Derevier, W.-H. Shen, A. Dong, and P. Genschik: Cell cycle-dependent proteolysis and ectopic overexpression of cyclin B1 in tobacco BY2 cells; The Plant Journal 24 (2000) 763–773. 849. Crooks, E.L. and C.S. Lyman: Measurement of intrapuff delivery of nicotine and glycerine from Premier;
850.
851.
852.
853.
854.
855.
856.
857.
858.
859.
860.
861.
862.
863.
864.
865.
RDM, 1989, No. 66, March 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508614870 -4896. Crooks, E.L. and D. Lynm: The measurement of nicotine intrapuff yield; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 33, 1989, p. 30; Measurement of intrapuff nicotine yield; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 15 (1992) 75–86. Crouse, R.H., J.W. Garner, and H.J. O’Neill: Determination of phenolic constituents of cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; J. Gas Chromat. 1(2) (1963) 18–22. Crouse, W.E., L.F. Johnson, and R.S. Marmor: A convenient method for the determination of ambient nicotine; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 111–113. Crowell, E.P.: Determination of moisture in total particulate matter of cigarette smoke by near-infrared spectrophotometry; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 30, 1960, p. 15; Crowell, E.P., W.F. Kuhn, F.E. Resnik, and C.J. Varsel: The determination of moisture in total particulate matter of cigarette smoke by near-infrared spectrophotometry; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 54–57. Crummett, W.B.: Environmental chlorinated dioxins from combustion – the trace chemistries of fire hypothesis; in: Chlorinated dioxins and related compounds, edited by O. Hutzinger, R.W. Frei, E. Merian, and F. Pocchiari, Pergamon Press, New York, NY (1982) pp. 253–264. Cumming, E.M.: A smoking machine attachment for the analysis of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and nitric oxide in the vapour phase of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 153–157. Cundiff, R.H.: Determination of alkaloids in tobacco and tobacco products; RDR, 1954, No. 5, July 14, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501662742 -2759. Cundiff, R.H.: Determination of acids in smoke; RDR, 1955, No. 8. August 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501663250 -3267. Cundiff, R.H.: Determination of propylene glycol and glycerol in tobacco; RDR, 1958, No. 8, June 2, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500932300 -2315. Cundiff, R.H.: Gross separation and determination of the phenolic fraction from tobacco smoke condensate; RDR, 1961, No. 9, February 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936107 -6124. Cundiff, R.H.: Investigation of a colorimetric method for determination of acrolein; RDM, 1963, No. 79, October 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601502 -1505. Cundiff, R.H.: The spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1964, No. 29, May 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 502669434 -9448. Cundiff, R.H.: Preparation of some experimental cigarettes; in: Report No. 1. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. The first set of experimental cigarettes, edited by G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. (NIH) 76–905 (1976), pp. 18–32. Cundiff, R.H.: Preparation of some experimental cigarettes; in: Report No. 4. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. The fourth set of experimental cigarettes, edited by G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. (NIH) (March 1980), pp. 127–148. Cundiff, R.H. and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Determination of potassium and calcium in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 49 (1966) 521–525. Cundiff, R.H. and G.H. Greene: Column elution of humectants from tobacco and determination by vapor chromatography. RDR, 1963, No. 25, March 25, see
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1293
11/24/08 2:39:34 PM
1294
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
866.
867.
868.
869.
870.
871.
872.
873.
874. 875.
876.
877.
878.
879.
880.
www.rjrtdocs.com 500961472 -1492; Cundiff, R.H, G.H. Greene, and A.H. Laurene: Column elution of humectants from tobacco and determination by vapor chromatography; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 163–168. Cundiff, R.H and P.C. Markunas: A rapid titrimetric procedure for the determination of nicotine, nornicotine, and total alkaloids in tobacco and tobacco products; 7th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 7, Paper No. 3, 1953, p. 4. Cundiff, R.H and P.C. Markunas: Determination of nicotine, nornicotine, and total alkaloids in tobacco; Anal. Chem. 27 (1955) 1650–1653. Cundiff, R.H and P.C. Markunas: Modification of the extraction procedure for determination of alkaloids in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 43 (1960) 519–524. Cundiff, R.H and P.C. Markunas: Titrimetric analysis of 2,4,7-trinitrofluorenone complexes; Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 1323–1324. Cundiff, R.H and P.C. Markunas: Abbreviated techniques for determination of alkaloids in tobacco using the extraction procedure; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 136–137; Tob Sci. 9 (1965) 111. Cundiff, R.H., A.J. Sensabaugh Jr, and P.C. Markunas: Titrimetric determination of acid fractions of tobacco smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 14, 1961, p. 7; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 25–27. Cundiff, R.H. and N. Van Hoy: Determination of formaldehyde in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 13, March 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965702 -5715. Curran, J.G.: Delivery of menthol from cigarettes containing either a mentholated filter or mentholated tobacco; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 40–42. Curran, J.G.: Effect of certain liquid filter additives on menthol delivery; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 69–70. Cuzin, J.L.: What is evidence for the presence of significant amounts of carcinogens in cigarette paper? In cigarette tobacco? In cigarette additives? Proc. 1st Conf. Lung Cancer Res. (1958) 49–50. Cuzin, J.L.: La composition chimique et la structure physique de la fumée du tabac: La problematique des recherches concernant la fumée [The chemical composition and physical structure of tobacco smoke: The general problems of research on tobacco smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 449–454. Cuzin J.L.: The chemical composition and physical structure of the tobacco smoke: The general problems of research on tobacco smoke; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 455–459. Cuzin, J.L.: Determination of anthracene, pyrene, and benzo[a]pyrene in condensates of tobacco smoke; SEITA (January, 1960). Cuzin, J.L.: Über einige Alkaloidähnliche Verbindungen des Tabakrauches [About several alkaloid-like compounds of tobacco smoke]; Abhandl. Dev. Akad. Berlin Klin. Chem. Geol. Biol. (1966) 171–172, 181–186. Cuzin, J.L. and M. Guillard: Thermal analysis of the burning cigarette: Presentation of a first model approach; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 6, 1963, pp. 7–8; Analyse thermique de la cigarette en combustion [Thermal analysis of the burning cigarette]; Ann. Direc. Études Équipement, SEITA 2 (Sect.1) (1964) 121–145.
881. Cuzin, J.L. and M. Guillard: Analyse optique de la phase dispersée de l`aérosol fumée [Optical analysis of the dispersed phase of the (cigarette) smoke aerosol]; Ann. Direc. Études Équipement, SEITA 1 (Sect.1) (1963) 163–167. 882. Cuzin, J.L., M. Hubert-Habart, B. Muel, R. Roger, and R. Latarjet: La production du benzo-3,4-pyrene dans des cigarettes à papier imprégné de sulfamate d’ammonium [The production of 3,4-benzopyrene in cigarettes with paper impregnated with ammonium sulfamate]; Bull. Soc. Chim. France (1960) 982. 883. Cuzin, J.L., Le Van Thoi, and S. Morée: Les hydrocarbures paraffiniques du tabac et de sa fumée [The paraffinic hydrocarbons of tobacco and its smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958, (1959) 507–512. 884. Cuzin, J.L., A. Testa, and S. Testa: Die selektive Retention bestimmter chemischer Bestandteile des Kondensates: Phenole, Polyphenole, heterocyclische Stickstoffverbindungen [Selective retention determined for chemical components of smoke condensate: Phenols, polyphenols, and heterocyclic nitrogen compounds]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 215–219. 885. Cuzin, J.L., A. Testa, S. Testa, and G. Anguerra: Controle chimique et biologique des condensate résultants du fumage de tabacs traités selon les procédés sous brevet NeukommBonnet [Chemical and biological control of condensates from the smoking of tobacco treated by the process in the Neukomm-Bonnet patent]; Z. Präventivmed. 8 (1963) 125–137. 886. Cvetković, N., B. Adnajević, and M. Nikolić: Carbon monoxide elimination from tobacco smoke; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper STPOST11, p. 214. 887. Cvetković, N., B. Adnajević, and M. Nikolić: Catalytic reduction of NO and NOx content in tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 43–48. 888. Dabrowska, O.: Nicotine, resins, reducing agents in the smoke of Polish cigarettes from different flue-cured and Turkish type tobaccos; Prace Tytoniowe Zeszyt (1949) 149–165. 889. Daff, M.E. and E.L. Kennaway: The arsenic content of tobacco and of tobacco smoke; Brit. J. Cancer 4 (1950) 173–182. 889a. Daff, M.E., R. Doll, and E.L. Kennaway: Cancer of the lung in relation to tobacco; Brit. J. Cancer 5 (1951) 1–20. 890. Dagnon, S. and A. Edreva: Application of pattern recognition methods for color assessment of Oriental tobacco based on HPLC of polyphenols; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 355–359. 891. Daheng, Z., H. Jinfeng, G. Chunyun, and C. Rui: Changes in higher fatty acids and related biochemical characteristics of flue-cured tobacco during aging; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 315–319. 891a. Dalhamn, T: The effect of cigarette smoke on ciliary activity in the upper respiratory tract; Arch. Otolaryng. 70 (1959) 166–168; Studies on the effect of sulfur dioxide on ciliary activity in vivo and in vitro and on the resorptional capacity of the nasal cavity; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 83 (1961) 566–567; Effect of cigarette smoke on ciliary activity; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 93 (1966) 108–114, also see discussion, 125–133. 891b. Dalhamn, T.: Effect of different doses of tobacco smoke on ciliary activity in cat. Variations in amount of tobacco smoke, interval between cigarettes, content of “tar”, nicotine, and phenol; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1294
11/24/08 2:39:35 PM
Bibliography
891c.
892.
893.
893a.
893b.
893c.
894.
894a.
894b.
895.
896.
897.
898.
898a.
899. 900.
901.
902.
903.
edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 79–87. Dalhamn, T.: Some factors influencing the respiratory toxicity of cigarette smoke; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1821–1824. Dalhamn, T., M.L. Edfors, and R. Rylander: Mouth absorption of various compounds in cigarette smoke; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 16 (1968) 831–835. Dalhamn, T., M.L. Edfors, and R. Rylander: Retention of cigarette smoke components in human lungs; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 17 (1968) 746–748. Dalhamn, T. and R. Rylander: Ciliastatic action of smoke from filter-tipped and non-tipped cigarettes; Nature 201 (1964) 401–402. Dalhamn, T. and R. Rylander: Ciliastasis and cigarette smoke: Varying exposure time; Arch. Otolaryngol. 81 (1965) 379–382. Dalhamn, T. and R. Rylander: Ciliastasis and cigarette smoke: Effect of varying composition of smoke; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 13 (1966) 47–50. Dalhamn, T. and R. Rylander: Ciliotoxicity of cigarette smoke and its components; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 98 (1968) 509–511. Dalhamn, T. and R. Rylander: Recommendations by individuals; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 273–279, see p. 277. Dalhamn, T. and J. Sjoholm: Studies on SO2, NO2, and NH3: Effect on ciliary activity in rabbit trachea of single in vitro exposure and resorption in rabbit nasal cavity; Acta Physiol. Scand. 58 (1963) 287–291. d’Andres, S., R. Boudoux, J.-M. Renaud, and J. Zuber: TSNA levels in the mainstream smoke of simplified blend prototypes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 331–340. Danehower, D.A.: A rapid method for the isolation and quantitation of the sucrose esters of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 31 (1987) 32–35. Danehower, D.A., R.R. Izac, H.J. Grubbs, M.T. Core, and S.B. Hassam: A rapid method for the analysis of z-abienol; Tob. Sci. 31 (1987) 48–51. Danehower, D.A., R.C. Long, M.T. Core, R.R. Izac, and H.J. Grubbs: Changes in z-abienol levels during growth and curing of an Oriental and South American flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 32 (1988) 49–52. Daniel, O., M.S. Meier, J. Schlatter, and P. Frischknecht: Selected phenolic compounds in cultivated plants: Ecologic functions, health implications, and modulation by pesticides; Environmental Hlth. Perspectives 107 (1999) 109–114. Dannenburg, W.: Indole compounds and their effect on the quality of tobacco; RDM, 1958, No. 28, April 3. Dare, D.L., I.D. Entwistle, and R.A.W. Johnstone: Polyolefins in cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1966) 629–630. Dare, D.L., I.D. Entwistle, and R.A.W. Johnstone: Synthesis of 3-substituted furans and the formation of 3-(4,8,12-trimethyl-tridecyl)furan; J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Transact. (1973) 1130–1134. Darrall, K.G., J.A. Figgins, R.D. Brown, and G.F. Phillips: Determination of benzene and associated volatile compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke; Analyst 123 (1998) 1095–1101. D’Arrigo, V. and L. Laghi: Presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in green and industrially handled tobacco leaves; Quad. Merceol. 11 (1972) 27–32.
1295
903a. Da Silva, P., C. Landon, B. Industri, A. Marais, D. Marion, M. Ponchet, and F. Vovelle: Solution structure of a tobacco lipid transfer protein exhibiting new biophysical and biological features; Proteins 59 (2005) 356–367. 904. Dattilo, B.S., S. Gallo, and G. Lionetti: Determination of residues of eight synthetic pyrethroids in tobacco by capillary gas chromatography; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1994) 65–75. 905. Dattilo, B.S., S. Gallo, G. Lionetti, and S.G. Ross: Determination of free and bound maleic hydrazide residues in tobacco by high performance liquid chromatography; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1994) 57–64. 905a. Dauben, W.G., W.E. Thiessen, and P.R. Resnick: Cembrene, a 14-membered ring diterpene hydrocarbon; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84 (1962) 2015–2016. 906. Daudel, P. and R. Daudel: Application of wave-motion mechanics to the study of the mechanism of action of cancerogenic substances on tissues; Biol. Med. 39 (1950, No.4) 201–236. 906a. Daudel, P. and R. Daudel: Chemical carcinogenesis and molecular biology; Interscience Publishers: London, 1966. 907. Davis, B.R., T.H. Houseman, and H.R. Roderick: Studies of cigarette smoke transfer using radioisotopically labelled tobacco constituents. Part III. The use of dotriacontane16,17–14C as a marker for the deposition of cigarette smoke in the respiratory system of experimental animals; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 148–153. 907a. Davis, D.L.: Sterol distribution within green and air cured tobacco; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 489–494. 908. Davis, D.L.: Waxes and lipids and their relationship to smoking quality and aroma; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 2 (1976) 80–111. 909. Davis, D.L.: Tobacco terpenoids and the influence of curing regimes; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 233–254. 910. Davis, D.L and R.B. Griffith: The distribution of smoke components in a mainstream-sidestream exposure system; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 42, 1983, p. 23. 910a. Davis, D.L. and M.T. Nielsen (Editors): Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999). 911. Davis, D.L, K.L. Stevens, and L. Jurd: Volatile constituents of air-cured, flue-cured, freeze-dried, and homogenized leaf cured (HLC) tobaccos; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 30, 1975, p. 23. 911a. Davis, H.J. and T.W. George: On the potential for the selective filtration of cigarette smoke by cellulose acetate fiber; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 18, 1962, p. 12. 912. Davis, H.J. and T.W. George: A dimensionless measure of filter selectivity: Geometric factors in cigarette construction which influence this measure; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1965(1) 7–21; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 203–214. 913. Davis, H.J., L.A. Lee, and T.R. Davidson: The fluorimetric determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chem. 38 (1966) 1752–1755.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1295
11/24/08 2:39:35 PM
1296
914. Davis, R.E.: A combined automated procedure for the determination of reducing sugars and nicotine alkaloids in tobacco product using a new reducing sugar method; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 139–144. 915. Davis, R.W. and B.H. Sneade: Determination of total aldehydes and acrolein in mainstream vapor phase cigarette smoke; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 12, 1970, p. 8. 915a. Dawson, R.F.: Tobacco alkaloids; 1st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 1, Paper No. 6, 1947. 915b. Dawson, R.F.: Method for the quantitative determination of nicotine and nornicotine. A progress report; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 1, 1948. 916. Dawson, R.F.: The cigarette and its smoke; Columbia Eng. Quart. 8(2) (1955) 10–13, 30, 32. 916a. Dawson, R.F., R.D. Carpenter, F.L. Gager Jr, R. W. Jenkins Jr, and R.H. Newman: The utility of carbon-14 for ascertaining precursor-product relationships in cigarette smoke; Proc. World Tob. Sci. Conf. 5 (1970) 105–110. 917. Dawson, R.F. and E. Wada: Flavonoids and depsides of the green tobacco leaf: I. Rutin and chlorogenic acid; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 47–50. 918. Day, J.M., R.D. Bateman, and E.C. Cogbill: Determination of trace amounts of nickel in tobacco by neutron activation analysis; 145th Ann. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., New York, NY (1963) p. 23A. 918a. DeBardeleben, M.Z., W.E. Claflin, and W.F. Gannon: Role of cigarette physical characteristics on smoke composition; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 4 (1978) 85–111. 919. DeBardeleben, M.Z., J.E. Wickham, and W.F. Kuhn: The determination of tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke from an historical perspective; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 17 (1991) 115–148. 920. de Campos, M.D.: Tobacco and cigar smoke; Anais Faculdade Farm. Odontol. Unic. (Sao Paulo) 1 (1939/1940) 15–24, see Chem. Abstr. 39 (1945) 5395. 920a. Decarboxylase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term decarboxylase glycine tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: Peterson, R.B. Regulation of glycine decarboxylase and L-serine hydroxymethyltransferase activities by glyoxylate in tobacco leaf mitochondrial preparations; Plant Physiol. 70 (1982) 61–66. Search for other decarboxylases provides similar references. 921. Decker, C., A. Girardet, P. Golaz, and R. Regamey: A multiple automatic apparatus for the estimation of nicotine and tar in cigarette smoke; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. 46 (1955) 178–192. 922. de Clercque, M. and R. Truhaut: Nicotyrine and its determination by the Koenig reaction; Ann. Pharm. Franc. 15 (1957) 529–533. 922a. Dehydrogenase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term dehydrogenase proline tobacco provides numerous references to it, e.g., Kochetov, A.V., S.E. Titov, et al.: Increase in the level of proline and osmotic pressure of cytoplasm in transformed tobacco bearing an antisense suppressor of the proline dehydrogenaase gene; Genetika 40 (2004) 282–285. A similar search for dehydrogenase xanthine tobacco provides many references, including the following: Nguyen, J. and A. Nato: In vitro study of the
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
922b.
922c.
922d.
923.
924.
925.
926.
927.
928.
928a.
928b.
929.
929a.
930.
931.
932.
xanthene dehydrogenase from illuminated or darken leaves; Physiol. Plantarum 59 (1983) 73. A similar search for other dehydrogenases provides numerous references. de Heil, J.T., J.M. Van Dort, and M. Renes: The (bio-)synthesis of megastigmatrienone; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 55, 1989, p. 28. Deichmann, W.D., M.D. Kitzmiller, and S. Witherup: The effects upon experimental animals of the inhalation of phenol; Am. J. Clin. Path. 14 (1944) 273. DeJong, D.W. and J.J. Lam Jr: Protein content of tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 584–592; J. Anal. Toxicol. 1 (1977) 78–103. DeJong, D.W. and W.G. Woodlief: Some factors influencing tobacco leaf senescence; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1979) 48–56. de la Burde, R., R.F. Crayton, and A. Bavley: The fate of carbohydrates during the thermal degradation of tobacco; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 13, 1962, pp. 9–10. de la Burde, R. and S.F. Norman: The isolation and characterization of the pectic substances from tobacco; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 236–240. de la Burde, R. and E.H. Poindexter Jr: Oxidative products of hexoses in thermally treated tobacco; Nature 198 (1963) 1089–1090. de la Burde, R., E.H. Poindexter Jr, and J.H. Bell: The distribution of amino acids in tobaccos from different stalk regions; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 26–32. Della Porta, G., L. Kolb, and P. Shubik: Induction of tracheobronchial carcinomas in the Syrian golden hamster; Cancer Res. 18 (1958) 592–597. Delon, R. and M.-N. Pululu: The chemical control of tobacco black root rot; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 189–195. Deluc, L., F. Barrieu, C. Marchive, V. Lauvergeat, A. Decendit, T. Richard, J.-P. Carde, J.-M. Mérillon, and S. Hamdi: Characterization of a grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor that regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway; Plant Physiol. 140 (2006) 499–511. DeLuca, T.C.: Collection of carbonyl compounds in environmental tobacco smoke using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine coated silica SEP-PAK cartridges; R&DM, 1987, No. 215, December 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512096470 -6479; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 46, 1988, p. 40, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507993449 -3463. DeLucia, M.L., C.F. Mattina, and W.A. Selke: Physical parameters that affect composition of smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 6 (1980) 225–238. DeMarini, D.M.: Mutagenicity of cigarette smoke condensate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Mutation Res. 53 (1978) 84. DeMarini, D.M.: Mutagenicity of fractions of cigarette smoke condensate in Neurospora crassa and Salmonella typhimurium; Mutation Res. 88 (1981) 363–374. DeMarini, D.M.: Mutagenicity of cigarette smoke condensate in Neurospora crassa; Mutation Res. 88 (1981) 375–388.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1296
11/24/08 2:39:35 PM
Bibliography
933. DeMarini, D.M.: Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate; Mutation Res. 114 (1983) 59–89. 934. Demetriou, D. and G. Schepers: Determination of benzo[a]pyrene in complex matrix by multidimensional high-performance liquid chromatography; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 10, 1999, p. 24. 935. Demian, B.A.: Trace analysis of vanillin in tobacco; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 45, 1992, p. 50. 936. Demole, E. and D. Berthet: Identification de la damascenone et de la B-damascone dans le tabac burley [Identification of damascenone and B-damascone in burley tobacco]; Helv. Chim. Acta 54 (1971) 681–682. 937. Demole, E. and D. Berthet: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). I. Volatile to medium-volatile constituents (b.p. a 84–114°C/0.001 Torr); Helv. Chim. Acta 55 (1972) 1866–1882. 938. Demole, E. and D. Berthet: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). II. Mediumvolatile, free acidic constituents (~b.p. 84–114°C/0.001 Torr); Helv. Chim. Acta 55 (1972) 1898–1901. 939. Demole, E. and C. Demole: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). V. Identification and synthesis of the novel terpenoid alkaloids 1,3,6,6tetramethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroisoquinolin-8-one and 3,6, 6-trimethyl-5,6-dihydropyridin-2-one; Helv. Chim. Acta 58 (1975) 523–531. 940. Demole, E. and C. Demole: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). VII. Identification and synthesis of twelve irregular terpenoid alkaloids related to solanone including 7,8-oxabicyclo[3,2,1]octane and 4,5-dioxabicyclo[3,3,1]nonane; Helv. Chim. Acta 58 (1975) 1867–1880. 941. Demole, E., C. Demole, and D. Berthet: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). III. Structure determination and synthesis of 5-(4-methyl-2-furyl)-6-methylheptan-2-one (“solanofuran”) and of 3.4.7-trimethyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-2-one (“spiroxabovolide”). Two new flavor components of burley tobacco; Helv. Chim. Acta 56 (1973) 265–271. 942. Demole, E., C. Demole, and D. Berthet: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). IV. Identification of seven new solanone metabolites including 7,8-dioxabicyclo[3,2,1]octane and 4,9dioxabicyclo[3,3,1]nonane derivatives; Helv. Chim. Acta 57 (1964) 192–194. 943. Demole, E. and P. Dietrich: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.); in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 1–36. 943a. Demole, E. and P. Enggist: Novel synthesis of 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-(2-butenylidene)-cyclohex-2-en-1-one, a major constituent of burley tobacco flavor; Helv. Chim. Acta 57 (1974) 2087–2091. 944. Demole, E. and P. Enggist: A chemical study of burley tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). VI. Identification and synthesis of four irregular terpenoids related to solanone, including “prenylsolanone”; Helv. Chim. Acta 58 (1975) 1602–1607.
1297
945. Demole, E. and P. Enggist: A chemical study of Virginia tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). I. Identification and synthesis of two bicyclodamascenones; Helv. Chem. Acta 59 (1976) 1938–1943. 946. Demole, E. and P. Enggist: A chemical study of Virginia tobacco flavour (Nicotiana tabacum L.). II. Isolation and synthesis of cis-2-isopropenyl-8-methyl-1,2,3,4tetrahydro-1-naphthalenol and 3-isopropenyl-5-methyl1,2-dihydronaphthalene; Helv. Chim. Acta 61 (1978) 1335–1341. 947. Demole, E. and P. Enggist: Identification of twenty-one novel constituents of Oriental tobacco flavor (Nicotiana tabacum L.), including (E)-3-methylnon-2-en-4-one, pentadecan-15-olide, 8A,13`,9A,13-diepoxy-15,16-dinorlabdane, (Z)-octadec-9-en-18-olide and (E)-2-ethylidene-6,10,14trimethylpentadecanal; Helv. Chim. Acta 61 (1978) 2318–2327. 948. Demole, E., P. Enggist, M. Winter, A. Furrer, K.H. Schulte-Elte, B. Egger, and G. Ohloff: Megastigma-5,8dien-4-on, ein Aromastoff der gelben Passionsfrucht und des Virginia Tabaks [Megastigma-5,8-dien-4-one, an aroma substance of the yellow passion fruit and Virginia tobacco]; Helv. Chim. Acta 62 (1979) 67. 949. Denissenko, M.F., A. Pao, M. Tang, and G.P. Pfeifer: Preferential formation of benzo[a]pyrene adducts at lung cancer mutational hotspots in P53; Science 274 (1996) 430–432. 950. Denissenko, M.F., J.X. Chen, M. Tang, and G.P. Pfeifer: Cytosine methylation determines hot spots of DNA damage in the human P53 gene; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94 (1997) 3893–3898. 950a. Denslow, S.A., A.A. Walls, and M.E. Daub: Regulation of biosynthetic genes and antioxidant properties of vitamin B6 vitamers during plant defense responses; Physiol. Molecular Plant Pathol. 66 (2005) 244–255. 950b. Deoxyrinonucleic acid (DNA): By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term deoxyrinonucleic acid tobacco clone and the specific clone number provides numerous references to it, e.g., Ohtani, T., H. Uchimiya, A. Kato, H. Harada, M. Sugita, and M. Sugiura: Localization and nucleotide sequence of a tobacco chloroplast DNA segment capable of replication in the yeast; Mol. Gen. Genet 195 (1984) 1–4. The search provides similar references to other deoxyrinonucleic acid tobacco studies. 950c. DePuy, C.H. and R.W. King: Pyrolytic cis eliminations; Chem. Rev. 60 (1960) 431–457. 951. de Roton, C., B. Vial, I. Wahlberg, A. Wiernik, H. San, and J.L. Verrier: Study of factors influencing the concentration of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) in air-cured tobaccos; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 98, 2001, p. 77. 952. Derreux, M., P. Viart, and D. Esnault: The essential oil of tobacco. Study of the phenol fraction; Ann. Tabac 11 (1973) 121–129. 953. de Souza, T.L. and M. Scherback: The effect of glycerol added to tobacco on the constituents of cigarette smoke; Analyst 89 (1964) 735–739. 954. Deutsch, L.J. and A.L. Jeffords: Simultaneous gas chromatographic nicotine/water analysis in smoke via split injection on dual capillary columns; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 35, 1994, p. 45.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1297
11/24/08 2:39:35 PM
1298
955. Deutsch, L.J. and R.M. Robertson: Variability in the determination of water in tobacco smoke; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 21, 1991, p. 24. 956. Deutsch, L.J. and J. Suthar: Contributions to variability in the analysis of water in cigarette smoke and cigarette filters; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 45, 2002, p. 47. 956a. Deutsch-Wenzel, R., H. Brune, G. Grimmer, and J. Misfeld: Local application to mouse skin as a carcinogen specific test system for nonvolatile N-nitroso compounds; Cancer Lett. 29 (1985) 85–92. 957. De Voogd, J.G. and A. Van der Linden: Carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke; Het. Gas 59 (1939) 165–166. 958. Devreux, M., D. Esnault, and F. Gastal: Essential tobacco oil. Study of the fatty acid fraction; Ann. Tabac, SEITA, Series 1 1976(14) 111–117. 959. DeVries, A., M. DeBoer, and D. Schürer: A fully automated ultraviolet method for the determination of nicotine alkaloids in tobacco and tobacco smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 64–66. 960. de Wet, W.J.: Method for the quantitative determination of the volatile organic acids in the range C1 to C6 in tobacco smoke; South African J. Agr. Sci. 6 (1963) 535–540. 960a. Dewitte, W., A. Chiappetta, A. Azmi, E. Witters, M. Strnad, J. Rembur, M. Noin, D. Chriqui, and H. Van Onckelen: Dynamics of cytokinins in apical shoot meristems of a day-neutral tobacco during floral transition and flower formation; Plant Physiol. 119 (1999) 111–122. 960b. Diamond, L.: Pulmonary toxicity of nitrogen oxides; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 67–74. 960c. Diana, J.N. and W.A. Pryor (Editors): Tobacco smoking and nutrition: Influence of nutrition on tobacco-associated health risks; N. Y. Acad. Sci., New York, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 686 (1993) 1–366: 961. Dickens, F. and D.K. Black: Chemical and biological studies on some components of tobacco smoke; Tob. Bibliography 12(3) (1965) 320. 962. Dickerson, J.P. and H.E. Moser: Factors affecting nicotine in tobacco smoke; RDR, 1973, No. 9, September 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003759 -3830. 963. Dickerson, J.P., I. Neas, G.W. Brown, R.M. Henderson, W.B. James, W.B. Line, and H.C. Threatt Jr: Evaluation of once-over low-profile tobacco. Part I. Processing and leaf analysis; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 59–63. 964. Dickerson, J.P., I. Neas, G.W. Brown, R.M. Henderson, W.B. James, W.B. Line, and H.C. Threatt Jr: Evaluation of once-over low-profile tobacco. Part II. Smoke chemistry and smoking panel evaluation; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 67–70. 965. Dickerson, J.P., D.L. Roberts, C.W. Miller, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and C.E. Rix: Flue-cured tobacco flavor. II. Constituents arising from amino acid-sugar reactions; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 59–63. 966. Dickey, J.B. and G.P. Touey: Tobacco research: Hydrocarbon components of the gaseous phase of cigarette smoke; Seminar presented at Research Dept., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC (March 1, 1956), edited by A. Rodgman, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503132566 -2594.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
967. Diekmann, J., C. Biefel, R. Stabbert, and K. Rustemeier: Analysis of unsymdimethylhydrazine in cigarette smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 12, 2001, p. 27. 968. Diekmann, J. and K. Rustemeier: A new method for the analysis of propylene glycol in cigarette smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 18, 2002, p. 29. 969. Dieterman, L.J., C.H. Yang, Y. Nakagawa, and S.H. Wender: Identification of esculetin in tobacco and in cigarette smoke; J. Org. Chem. 24 (1959) 1134–1136. 970. Diffee, J.T.: The spectrophotometric determination of total ortho-dihydroxyphenolic compounds in tobacco; RDM, 1973, No. 32, December 11, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500606307 -6317. 971. Diffee, J.T.: The spectrophotometric determination of total carotenoids in cured and green tobacco; RDM, 1974, No. 5, February 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503179271 -9287; 500606395 -6407. 972. Diffee, J.T.: Spectrophotometric determination of total carotenoids in cured and green tobacco leaves; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 37, 1974, p. 26. 973. Diffee, J.T.: Automated determination of nicotine alkaloids in cigarette smoke total particulate matter; RDM, 1975, No. 20, May 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616251 -6262. 974. Diffee, J.T.: Determination of triethylene glycol, glycerol, and propylene glycol on Winston Lights CPB by near-infrared (NIR) reflectance spectroscopy: A feasibility study; R&DM, 1986, No. 110, July 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505448344 -8381. 975. Diffee, J.T. and M. E. Sheppard: An automated method for the determination of nicotine alkaloids in cigarette smoke using cyanogen bromide; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 26, 1971, p. 15. 976. DiGiovanni, J., T.J. Slaga, D.L. Berry, and M.R. Juchau: Inhibitory effects of environmental chemicals on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenesis; in: Carcinogenesis. A comprehensive survey. Vol. 5, edited by T.J. Slaga, Raven Press, New York, NY (1980) 145–168. 976a. Dijkema, C., H.C.M. Kester, and J. Visser: 13C NMR studies of carbon metabolism in the hyphal fungus Aspergillus nidulans; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82 (1985) 14–18. 977. Dikun, P.P.: Use of the fine structure of the fluorescence spectrum of 3:4-benzpyrene to increase the certainty of its detection; Voprosy Onkol. 5 (12) (1959) 672–677. 978. Dikun, P.P. and S.G. Chushkin: Fluorescence spectral analysis of the products of tobacco smoke; Voprosy Onkol. 5(7) (1959) 34–37. 979. Dikun, P.P., S.G. Chushkin, A.L. Gritsiute, and A.L. Mironova: The results of studies on the possible carcinogenic effect of tobacco products; Voprosy Onkol. 6 (1960) 603–604. 980. Dikun, P.P., I.A. Kalinina, N.D. Krasnitskaya, and V.A. Tokovoi: Absorption of 3,4-benzpyrene from tobacco smoke by various filtering materials; Voprosy Onkol. 11 (1965) 86–89. 981. Dikun, P.P., N.D. Krasnitskaya, and S.G. Chushkin: Some data on the content of 3,4-benzpyrene in tobacco smoke; Voprosy Onkol. 8 (1962) 31–35.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1298
11/24/08 2:39:36 PM
Bibliography
981a. Dinesh, T.K., R. Parthiban, A. Suresh, N. Palani, H.N. Ramprasad, and S.V. Dhalewadikar: Quantification of volatile acids in tobacco; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 68, 2005, p. 56. 982. Dipple, A., Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; in: Chemical carcinogens, 1st edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 173, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1976) 245–314. 983. Dipple, A., R.C. Moschel, and C.A.Y. Bigger: Polynuclear hydrocarbons; Chapter 2 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 41–163. 984. Dirinck, P., J. Veys, M. Decloedt, and N. Schamp: Headspace enrichment on Tenax for characterization and flavor evaluation of some tobacco types; Tob. Sci. 24 (1980) 157–161. 985. Dittmar, H.: Untersuchungen am Hauptrauch iranischer Tabakfabrikate. I [Study of the mainstream smoke of Iranian tobacco products. I]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 80 (1939) 67–71. 986. Dittmar, H.: Untersuchungen am Hauptrauch iranischer Tabakfabrikate. II [Study of the mainstream smoke of Iranian tobacco products. II]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 80 (1939) 259–263. 987. Dittmar, H.: Untersuchungen am Hauptrauch iranischer Tabakfabrikate. III [Study of the mainstream smoke of Iranian tobacco products. III]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 80 (1939) 457–462. 988. Dittmar, H.: The effect of saccharides in tobacco on some components of cigarette smoke; Tabak (Berlin) 1 (1940) 118–125. 988a. Dixon, M. and M.F. Borgerding: Recent advances in the understanding and application of alternative smoking regimes; Recent Adv. Tob. Res. 32 (2006) 3–83. 989. Dixon, M., K. Lambing, and J.I. Seeman: On the transfer of nicotine from tobacco to the smoker: A brief review of ammonia and “pH” factors; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 103–113. 990. Djordjevic, M.V.: Comparison study of the acid fractions of cigarette smoke condensate and of the essential oil from one variety of Yugoslavian tobacco; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S14, 120–121. 991. Djordjevic, M.V., W.H. Barr, S. Branciforte, H.R. Burton, and J.H. Jaffe: Reduced levels of 4-(methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol in smokers of cigarettes produced from nitrosamine-free tobacco; CORESTA, Mtg. Smoke-Technology Groups, Innsbruck, Austria (1999) Paper ST9. 992. Djordjevic, M.V., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Identification and analysis of a nicotine-derived N-nitrosamino acid and other nitrosamino acids in tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 41, 1988, p. 37; Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 1725–1731. 993. Djordjevic, M.V., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: The occurrence of N-nitrosamino acids in commercial tobacco products and the effect of storage conditions on their levels; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 23, 1992, p. 34.
1299
994. Djordjevic, M.V., L.P. Bush, S.L. Gay, and H.R. Burton: Accumulation and distribution of acylated nornicotine derivatives in flue-cured tobacco alkaloid isolines; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 25, 1988, p. 28. 995. Djordjevic, M.V., D. Desai, C. Sigountos, K.D. Brunnemann, D. Hoffmann, L.P. Bush, and H.R. Burton: Mechanistic studies on the formation of 4(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridyl)butyric acid and other tobacco-specific nitrosamines during tobacco processing; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 43, 1990, p. 33. 996. Djordjevic, M.V., D. Devic, and Z. Turkmanouric: Parallel investigation of the acid fractions of cigarette smoke condensate and the essential oil of one kind of Yugoslav cigarettes; Ann. Tabac, SEITA, Sect. 1. 1979 (17) 77–88. 997. Djordjevic, M.V., J.F. Fan, S. Akerkar, J. Heidbrink, J.P. Richie, and D. Hoffmann: Effects of smokers’ compensation on mainstream smoke chemistry and urinary biomarkers of exposure; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 64, 1996, pp. 58–59. 998. Djordjevic, M.V., J.F. Fan, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: in vitro Nitrosation of nicotine and some of its metabolites under physiological conditions; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 12, 1993, pp. 24–25. 999. Djordjevic, M.V., J.F. Fan, S. Ferguson, and D. Hoffmann: Self-regulation of smoking intensity: Smoke yields of the low-nicotine, low-“tar” cigarettes; Carcinogenesis 16 (1995) 2015–2021. 1000. Djordjevic, M.V., J.F. Fan, and D. Hoffmann: Assessment of chlorinated pesticide residues in tobacco products: Analysis based on supercritical fluid extraction; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 49, 1994, p. 55; Assessment of chlorinated pesticide residues in cigarette tobacco based on supercritical fluid extraction and GC-ECD; Carcinogenesis 16 (1995) 2627–2632. 1001. Djordjevic, M.V., J.F. Fan, and D. Hoffmann: Tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines and benzo[a]pyrene in the mainstream smoke of the leading U.S. commercial cigarettes; Unpublished [see D. Hoffmann and I. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. C.] The changing cigarette: 1950–1995; J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 50 (1997) 307–364]. 1002. Djordjevic, M.V., S.L. Gay, L.P. Bush, and J.F. Chaplin: Tobacco-specific nitrosamine accumulation and distribution in flue-cured tobacco alkaloid isolines; J. Agr. Food Chem. 37 (1989) 752–756. 1003. Djordjevic, M.V., S.L. Gay, L.P. Bush, and C.T. MacKown: Correlation between tobacco-specific nitrosamines and their precursors in midrib tissue of burley tobacco; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 10, 1986, p. 6. 1004. Djordjevic, M.V. and D. Hoffmann: Nicotine, pH, and N-nitrosamines in U.S. commercial moist snuff brands; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 35, 1995, p. 38. 1005. Djordjevic, M.V., D. Hoffmann, K.D. Brunnemann, and L.P. Bush: Effect of storage conditions on the levels of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1299
11/24/08 2:39:36 PM
1300
1006.
1006a.
1007.
1008.
1009.
1010.
1011.
1012.
1013.
1014.
1015.
1016.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
tobacco-specific nitrosamines, alkaloids and nitrite in U.S. commercial moist snuff; CORESTA 1992 Symp., Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1992 Spec. Edition: Paper ST17, 91. Djordjevic, M.V., D. Hoffmann, J.F. Fan, B. Prokopczyk, M.L. Citron, and C.D. Stellman: Assessment of chlorinated pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in adipose breast tissue using a supercritical fluid extraction method; Carcinogenesis 15 (1994) 2581–2585. Djordjevic, M.V., D. Hoffmann, and I. Hoffmann: Nicotine regulates smoking patterns; Prev. Med. 26 (1997) 435–440. Djordjevic, M.V., D. Hoffmann, S. Thompson, and S.D. Stellman: Tobacco and mainstream smoke chemistry of the leading U.S. and Japanese cigarette; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 59, 1998, p. 42. Djordjevic, M.V., J. Krzeminski, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Identification and quantitative analysis of new N-nitrosamino acids in snuff tobacco; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 16, 1991, p. 21. Djordjevic, M.V., J. Krzeminski, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Characterization of N-nitrosamino acids in tobacco products and assessment of their carcinogenic potential; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC: Paper No. 160 (1992). Djordjevic, M.V., C.T. MacKown, and L.P. Bush: Alkaloids, nitrates and nitrosamines in lamina and stem of burley tobacco differing in alkaloid concentration; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 41, 1985, p. 22. Djordjevic, M.V., B. Prokopczyk, and W. Zatonski: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNA) in tobacco and mainstream smoke of the leading Polish cigarettes: A comparison with the U.S. and Japanese brands; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST1, p. 145. Djordjevic, M.V., C. Sigountos, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: On the formation of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)4-(3-pyridyl)butyric acid in tobacco and tobacco smoke; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 27, 1989, p. 27. Djordjevic, M.V., C. Sigountos, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Formation of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-4-(3pyridyl)butyric acid in vitro and in mainstream cigarette smoke; J. Agr. Food Chem. 39 (1991) 209–213. Djordjevic, M.V., C. Sigountos, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamine delivery in the mainstream smoke of high- and low-yield cigarettes smoked with varying puff volumes; CORESTA 1990 Symp., Kallithea, Greece, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1990: Paper S04, 209. Djordjevic, M.V., C. Sigountos, K.D. Brunnemann, M.R. Kagan, L.P. Bush, R.D. Safaev, G.A. Belitsky, and M.R. Zaridze: Assessment of major carcinogens and alkaloids in the tobacco and mainstream smoke of USSR cigarettes; Int. J. Cancer 47 (1991) 348–351. Djordjevic, M.V. and S.D. Stellman: Actual dosages of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and benzo[a]pyrene delivered to smokers of low- and medium-nicotine cigarettes; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference,
1016a.
1017.
1018.
1019.
1020.
1021.
1022.
1023.
1024.
1024a.
1025.
1026. 1026a. 1027. 1028.
1029.
Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 36, 1999, pp. 39–40. Djordjevic, M.V., S.D. Stellman, and E. Zang: Doses of nicotine and lung cancer carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92 (2000) 106–111 Dobbins, J.T. Jr: Elution column preparation of leaf samples for flame photometry. I. Determination of potassium in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 44 (1961) 360–365. Dobbins, J.T. Jr: Elution column preparation of leaf samples for flame photometry. II. Determination of calcium in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 46 (1963) 418–424. Dobbins, J.T. Jr: Discussion of methods for determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (with Celanese research personnel); RDM, 1968, No. 62, October 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500604311 -4314. Dobrin, E.M.: A colorimetric method for determining nicotine and pyridine in tobacco; Vsesoyuzni Inst. Tabachnoi 104 (1933) 9–16. Dobrowolskaia-Zavadskaia, N.: Doses of 1,2,5,6dibenzanthracene capable of producing cancer in mice; Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol. 129 (1938) 1055. Dobrowska, O.: Nicotine, resins, and reducing agents in the smoke of Polish cigarettes made from different fluecured type and Turkish tobaccos; Prace Tyton. Zeszyt (1949) 149–165. Doihara, T., U. Kobashi, S. Sugawara, and Y. Kaburaki: Studies on flavoring effect. IV. Pyrolysis of polyhydric alcohols used as moistening agents; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 129–135. Doihara, T., U. Kobashi, S. Sugawara, and Y. Kaburaki: Studies on flavoring effect. V. The simple analysis of polyols in cigarettes by gas chromatography; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 141–145. Dolja, V.V., J. Hong, K.E. Keller, R.R. Martin, and V.V. Peremyslov: Suppression of potyvirus infection by coexpressed closterovirus protein; Virology 234 (1997) 243–52. Doll, R.: Smoking and lung cancer: Report to the subcommittee for the study of the risks of cancer from air pollution and the consumption of tobacco; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 1283–1296. Doll, R.: Carcinogens in the environment: Human evidence; T. Norsk. Laegeforen 88 (1968) 1187–1194. Doll, R. and A.B. Hill: Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report; Brit. Med. J. 1950 (ii) 739–748. Doll, R. and A.B. Hill: A study of the aetiology of carcinoma of the lung; Brit. Med. J. 1952(ii) 1271–1286. Domanski, J.J. and T.J. Sheets: Insecticide residues on 1970 U.S. auction market tobacco; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 55–57; Domanski, J.J., J.M. Laws, P.L. Haire, and T.J. Sheets: Insecticide residues on 1971 U.S. tobacco products; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 80–81; Domanski, J.J., P.L. Haire, and T.J. Sheets: Insecticide residues on 1972 U.S. auction-market tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 39–43; Domanski, J.J., P.L. Haire, and T.J. Sheets: Insecticide residues on 1973 U.S. tobacco products; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 108–109. Domanski, J.J. and T.J. Sheets: Environmental contamination of flue-cured tobacco with chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 330–333.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1300
11/24/08 2:39:36 PM
Bibliography
1030. Domanski, J.J., T.J. Sheets, and L.A. Nelson: Evaluation of four analytrcal methods for determining TDE and DDT in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 157–159. 1031. Dominguez, L.M.: Analysis of nicotine in smoked cigarette filters by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1982, No. 7, February 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500619148 -9161. 1032. Dominguez, L.M.: Formation of glucosamine (2-amino-2deoxyglucose) in tobacco; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 36, 2001, p. 41. 1033. Dominguez, L.M., C.H. Byrd, and J.W. Marshall Free amino acids and nicotine in burley tobaccos; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 21, 2002, pp. 30–31. 1034. Dominguez, L.M.: and T.R. Conner: Determination of glutamic acid, aspartic acid, asparagine, and glutamine in selected tobaccos by high-performance liquid chromatography; RDM, 1983, No. 19, April 28, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501661135 -1153. 1035. Dominguez, L.M. and C.R. Green: Analysis of nornicotine in selected tobaccos by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 26, July 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500609468 -9479. 1036. Dong, C.R. and T.C. Wen: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco leaf. I. The influence of tobacco curing on N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and nicotine contents; Yanjiu Huibao - Taiwansheng Ysnjui Gongmsiju Yanye Shiyanso 33 (1990) 39–45. 1037. Dong, J.-Z., J.N. Glass, and S.C. Moldoveanu: An improved GC/MS technique for the analysis of vapor phase smoke; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 64, 1997, p. 64. 1037a. Dong, J.-Z. and B.M. Gordon: A fast screening method for 1,3-butadiene in cigarette smoke; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 49, 2005, p. 45. 1037b. Dong, J.-Z. and B.M. Gordon: Determination of 1,3butadiene, ethylene oxide, vinyl chloride, and propylene oxide in mainstream vapor phase cigarette smoke; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 29, 2006, pp. 32–33. 1038. Dong, J.-Z., D.M. Hendrix, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of C4 carbonyls in the vapor phase of cigarette smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 64, 2001, p. 57. 1039. Dong, J.-Z. and S.C. Moldoveanu: GC/MS analysis of carbonyl compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Lexington, KY, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 63, 2002, p. 58. 1040. Dong, J.-Z., S.C. Moldoveanu, and J.H. Lauterbach: A parallel study between leaf chemistry and particulate-phase smoke chemistry; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 16, 1993, pp. 27–28. 1040a. Dong, M., I.D.C. Locke, and D. Hoffmann: Characterization of aza-arenes in the basic portion of suspended particulate matter; Environ. Sci. Technol. 11 (1977) 612–618.
1301
1041. Dong, M., I. Schmeltz, E. Jacobs, and D. Hoffmann: Aza-arenes in tobacco smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 43, 1977, p. 22; J. Anal. Toxicol. 2 (1978) 21–25. 1042. Dong, M., I. Schmeltz, E. Jacobs, and D. Hoffmann: Azaarenes in the respiratory environment: Analysis and assays for mutagenicity; Carcinogenesis 3 (1978) 97–108. 1043. Dontenwill, W.: Inhalationsversuche mit Tabakrauch [Inhalation studies with tobacco smoke]; in: Compounds having alkylating action, Verband der Cigarettenindustrie, Wissenschaftliche Forschungsstelle, Hamburg, Germany (1964) 133–137. 1044. Dontenwill, W.: Biological evaluation of carcinogens in tobacco and tobacco smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 209. 1045. Dontenwill, W., H.J. Chevalier, H.-P. Harke, U. Lafrenz, G. Reckseh, and B. Schneider: Investigations on the effects of chronic cigarette-smoke inhalation in Syrian golden hamsters; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 51 (1973) 1781–1832. 1046. Dontenwill, W., H. Elmenhorst, H.-P. Harke, G. Reckzeh, K.H. Weber, J. Misfeld, and J. Timm: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Tumorerzeugende Wirkung von Zigarettenrauch Kondensaten an der Mausehaut. I. Mitteilung. Gesamtversuch [Experimental study of the tumor-producing action of cigarette smoke condensate on mouse skin. Part I. Overall experiment]; Z. Krebsforsch. 73 (1970) 265–284. 1046a. Dontenwill, W., H. Elmenhorst, H.-P. Harke, G. Reckzeh, K.H. Weber, J. Misfeld, and J. Timm: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Tumorerzeugende Wirkung von Zigarettenrauch Kondensaten an der Mausehaut. II. Mitteiling. Einzelvergleiche zwischenden Kondensaten modifizierten Zigaretten [Experimental study of the tumor-producing action of cigarette smoke condensate on mouse skin. Part II. Comparison between condensates from modified cigarettes]; Z. Krebsforch. 73 (1970) 285–304. 1047. Dontenwill, W., H. Elmenhorst, H.-P. Harke, G. Reckzeh, K.H. Weber, J. Misfeld, and J. Timm: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die tumorerzeugende Wirkung von Zigarettenrauchkondensaten an der Mäusehaut. III. Mitteilung. Untersuchungen zur Identifizierung und Anreicherung tumorauslösender Fraktionen [Experimental study of the tumor-producing action of cigarette smoke condensate on mouse skin. Part III. Study to identify and enrich the tumor producing fraction]; Z. Krebsforsch. 73 (1970) 305–314. 1048. Donzel, M.: Observations sur le dosage de l’acroléine dans la phase gazeuse de la fumée de cigarette: Étude critique de la méthode au 4-hexylrésorcinol [Observations on the determination of acrolein in the gas phase of cigarette smoke: Critical study of the 4-hexylresorcinol method]; Ann. Direc. Études Équip. SEITA 1969(7) 121–126. 1048a. Donzel, M., M. LeJeune, M.L. Renard, and B. Requillart: Influence des conditions de fumage sur la température de braise des cigarettes, la ciiliotoxicité et la composition de la phase gazeuse [The influence of smoking conditions on the temperature of the glowing end of cigarettes, ciliotoxicity and composition of the gas phase]; Ann. Direc. Études Équip. SEITA 1973 (11) 45–57.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1301
11/24/08 2:39:36 PM
1302
1049. Donzel, M.: The separation by gas chromatography of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones from carbonyl compounds of cigarette smoke. Application to the determination of formol; Ann. Direc. Études Équip. SEITA 1974(12) 109–115. 1050. Donzel, M. and A. Testa: Mise au point de dosages de routine sur la phase gazeuse de la fumée de cigarette [The elaboration of routine determinations on the gas phase of cigarette smoke]; Ann. Direc. Études Équip. SEITA 1969(7) 157–166. 1051. Doolittle, D.J., J.T. Avalos, B.R. Bombick, K.P. Putnam, D.W. Bombick, T.B. Nestor, and J.S. Gentry: Biological studies on smoke condensates from cigarettes made with low nitrosamine flue-cured tobacco; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 45, 2000, pp. 44–45, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 527118390 -8414; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST23, p. 168, see www. rjrtdocs.com 527118390 -8414. 1051a. Doong, R.L., K. Lilijebjelke, G. Fralich, A. Kumar, and D. Mohnen: Cell-free synthesis of pectin: Identification and partial characterization of polygalacturonate4-Agalacturonosyltransferase and its products from membrane preparation of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Samsun) cell suspension cultures; Plant Physiol. 109 (1995) 141–152. 1051b. Dorland, I.: Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary; 13th Edition; W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA (1927). 1051c. Dorland, I. and (W.A. Newman): Dorland’s illustrated medical dictionary; 27th Edition, edited by E.J. Taylor, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA (1988). 1051d. Dorough, H.W. and Y.H. Atallah: Cigarette smoke as a source of pesticide exposure; Bull. Environ. Contamination Toxicol. 13 (1975) 101–107. 1052. Dougherty, T.M.: Determination of A-amylase activity in flue-cured tobacco using a chromogenic substrate; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 139–141. 1053. Doull, J., J.P. Frawley, W.J. George, T.A. Loomis, R.A. Squire, and S.L. Taylor: List of ingredients added to tobacco in the manufacture of cigarettes by six major American cigarette companies; Covington and Burling, Washington, DC (April 12, 1994) pp. 1–24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511981022 -1046, 512013434 -3458; 512699201 -9225, 514262045 -2069, 515536758 -6782, 525405891 -5915; Tob. J. Int. 196 (1994) 32–39. 1054. Dravnieks, A., A. O’Donnel, and H.G. Reilich: Determination of odor components in tobacco smoke. Design of mixture to simulate odor; ASHRAE Trans. 81(2) (1975) 200–212. 1055. Dravnieks, A., J. Whitfield, and J. Shah: Determination of odor components in tobacco smoke; ASHRAE Trans. 80(2) (1974) 76. 1056. Druckrey, H.: Experimental investigations on the possible carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoking; Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 369 (1961) 24–42. 1056a. Druckrey, H., C. Landschütz, and R. Preussmann: Oesophagus Carcinome nach Inhalation von Methylbutylnitrosamine (MBNA) [Oesophageal carcinoma after inhalation of methylbutylnitrosamine (MBNA)]; Z. Krebsforsch. 71 (1968) 135–139. 1057. Druckrey, H. and R. Preussmann: Zur Entstehung carcinogener Nitrosamine am Beispiel des Tabaksrauch
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1058.
1059.
1060.
1060a.
1061.
1062.
1063.
1064.
1065.
1066.
1067.
1068.
1069.
[On the origin of carcinogenic nitrosamines for example in tobacco smoke]; Naturwissenschaften 49 (1962) 498–499. Druckrey, H., R. Preussmann, S. Ivankovic, and D. Schmähl: Organotrope carcinogene Wirkungen bei 65 verschiedenen N-Nitroso-Verbindungen an BD-Ratten [Organ-specific carcinogenicity of 65 different N-nitroso compounds in BD rats]; Z. Krebsforsch. 69 (1967) 103–201. Druckrey, H., R. Preussmann, D. Schmähl, and M. Müller: Chemische Konstitution und carcinogene Wirkung bei Nitrosamines [Chemical constitution and carcinogenic action of nitrosamines]; Naturwissenschaften 48 (1961) 134–135. Druckrey, H. and A. Schildbach: Quantitativen Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung des Benzpyrens für die Carcinogene Wirkung von Tabakrauch [Quantitative investigation of the significance of benzpyrene in the carcinogenic action of tobacco smoke]; Z. Krebsforsch. 65 (1963) 465–470. Druckrey, H. and D. Schmähl: Light-dependence of fluorescence of solutions of cigarette smoke; Science 121 (1955) 421. Druckrey, H., D. Schmähl, H. Beuthner, and F. Muth: Comparative investigation of the carcinogenic action in rats of tobacco condensate, tobacco extract, and benzpyrene; Naturwissenschaften 47 (1960) 605–606. Dube, M.F.: Analysis of solanesol in tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 45, November 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618840 -8853. Dube, M.F.: Aging study. II. Comparisons of unaged and 4-month aged burley tobaccos; R&DM, 1982, No. 1, January 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618987 -9056. Dube, M.F., A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, F.W. Best, and D.L. Heavner: Aging study. VIII. Comparisons of unaged, 4-month aged, 10-month aged, 16-month aged, and 24-month aged burley tobaccos; R&DM, 1984, No. 28, April 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505109182 -9237. Dube, M.F., A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, F.W. Best, and D.L. Heavner: Aging study. IX. Comparisons of unaged, 6-month aged, 12-month aged, 18-month aged, 24-month aged, and 36-month aged flue-cured tobaccos; R&DM, 1985, No. 87, December 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504657523 -7566. Dube, M.F., A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, F.W. Best, and D.L. Heavner: Aging study. X. Comparisons of unaged, 4-month aged, 10-month aged, 16-month aged, 24-month aged, and 36-month aged burley tobaccos; R&DM, 1985, No. 88, December 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504657480 -7522. Dube, M.F. and C.R. Green: Methods of collection of smoke for analytical purposes; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 8 (1982) 42–102. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, and F.W. Best: Aging study. V. Comparisons of unaged, 6-month aged, 12-month aged, and 18-month aged fluecured tobaccos; R&DM, 1983, No. 3, January 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501660739 -0762. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, and F.W. Best: Aging study. VI. Comparisons of unaged, 4-month aged, 10-month aged, and 16-month aged burley tobaccos; R&DM, 1983, No. 29, July 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661349 -1374.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1302
11/24/08 2:39:37 PM
Bibliography
1070. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, and F.W. Best: Aging study. VII. Comparisons of unaged, 6-month aged, 12-month aged, 18-month, and 24-month aged flue-cured tobaccos; R&DM, 1983, No. 40, August 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661583 -1635. 1071. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, A.L. Angel, F.W. Conrad, and F.W. Best: Aging study. I. Comparison of unaged and 6-month aged flue-cured tobaccos; R&DM, 1981, No. 44, November 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618765 -8790. 1072. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, F.W. Best, A.L. Angel, and F.W. Conrad: Aging study. II. Comparison of unaged and 4-month aged burley tobaccos; R&DM, 1982, No. 1, January 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618987 -9056. 1073. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, F.W. Best, A.L. Angel, and F.W. Conrad: Aging study. III. Comparisons of zero, 6-month aged, and 12-month aged flue-cured tobaccos; R&DM, 1982, No. 12, April 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500619260 -9327. 1074. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, F.W. Best, A.L. Angel, and F.W. Conrad: Aging study. IV. Comparisons of unaged, 4-month aged, and 10-month aged burley tobaccos; R&DM, 1982, No. 24, June 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500619488 -9555. 1075. Dube, M.F., C.W. Miller, and C.R. Green: Smoke comparison study of Freon 11 - and pentane-puffed tobacco cigarettes; RDR, 1979, No. 3, December 13, see www. rjrtdocs.com 507078899 -8905. 1075a. Dubinin, B.M. and G.V. Chelintsev: Pyrolysis of anabasine; Zhur. Obshch. Khim. 16 (1946) 105–108. 1076. Dumont, J., F. Larocque-Lazure, and C. Iorio: An alternative isolation procedure for the subsequent determination of benzo[a]pyrene in total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 34, 1989, p. 31; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 31 (1993) 371–374. 1076a. Dunn, J.A.: The carcinogenicity of steroid peroxides; Brit. J. Cancer 19 (1965) 496–500. 1077. Durot, N., D. Raverty-Lambert, C. LeMoigne, G. LeBourvellec, and N. Baskevitch; Tobacco cell wall polymers: Stems composition and organization; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 28, 2004, pp. 37–38. 1077a. Durot, N., D. Raverdy-Lambert, C. Le Moigne, G. Le Bourvellec, and N. Baskévitch; Protein removal from tobacco; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 35, 2005, p. 37. 1077b. Dyakonov, A.J., R.T. Walker, C.A. Little, F.R. Perini, D.S. Passer, and J. Guan: Participation of phenols in combustion of plant fuels; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 88, 2005, p. 68. 1078. Dymicky, M., O.T. Chortyk, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXVII. Polyphenolamino acid leaf pigment: Further structural investigations; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 42–44. 1079. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. I. B-Sitosterol D-glucoside from flue-cured tobacco leaves; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 99–101. 1080. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. IV. Ergosterol, G-sitosterol and a partially characterized steroidal glycoside from flue-cured leaves; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 4–8.
1303
1081. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. VII. Isoeugenol, hydrocarbons and probable bound stigmasterol from flue-cured leaves; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 60–61. 1082. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. IX. Campesterol from flue-cured leaves; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 179–181. 1083. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. X. Basic pigment of cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 75–76. 1084. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXV. Moieties in a high molecular weight smoke pigment: Alkaloids and a silicone; Phytochemistry 6 (1967) 1025–1031. 1085. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXIX. Strongly acidic subfraction of a high molecular weight smoke pigment; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 7–9. 1086. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXX. Basic pigment of cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 75–76. 1087. Dymicky, M. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXXV. Moieties in leaf and smoke condensate pigments: Acids; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 45–47. 1088. Dymond, H.F.: Physical dimensions and tar and nicotine yields of fine-cut smoking articles rolled by German consumers; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1999) 165–174. 1089. Eaker, D.W.: Methods for the determination of sidestream smoke carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and nonspecific volatile hydrocarbons. Time-resolved and total deliveries; R&DM, 1988, No. 207, August 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507038498 -8525. 1089a. Eaker, D.W.: Dynamic behavior and filtration of mainstream smoke in the tobacco column and filter; Recent. Adv. Tob. Sci. 16 (1990) 103–187. 1090. Eaker, D.W. and M.M. Bowe: A method for the determination of nicotine in sidestream smoke; R&DM, 1988, No. 206, August 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507038526 -8550. 1091. Eaker, D.W. and R. Hutcherson: Methods for collection of sidestream smoke components. Quantitation of HCN, NH3, B[a]P, and phenol; R&DM, 1985, No. 26, April 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505108382 -8391. 1092. Eaker, D.W. and P.P. Martin: Sidestream smoke collection methods for analytical determinations, genetic toxicity testing, magnesium and hydrogen cyanide; R&DM, 1988, No. 209, August 12, see www.rjrtdocs. com 507038440 -8450. 1093. Eaker, D.W. and D.E. Townsend: Investigation of mainstream water. Comparison of Winston and Marlboro and effects of selected construction parameters. R&DM, 1987, No. 13, January 19, see www.rjrtdocs. com 509649165 -9184. 1094. Eaton, J.J., R.D. Bereman, and N.J. Glass: An analytical method has been developed for naphthalene and methyl substituted naphthalenes found in mainstream cigarette smoke using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 13, 2003, p. 25. 1095. Eatough, D.J., C.L. Benner, J.M. Bayona, F.M. Caka, R.L. Mooney, J.D. Lamb, M.L. Lee, E.A. Lewis, L.D. Hansen, and N.L. Eatough: Identification of conservative tracers of environmental tobacco smoke; in: Proc. 4th Internat.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1303
11/24/08 2:39:37 PM
1304
1096.
1097.
1098.
1099.
1100.
1101.
1102.
1102a.
1103.
1104.
1105.
1106.
1107.
1108.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Conf. on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Inst. Water, Soil and Air Hygiene, West Berlin, edited by B. Seifert, H. Esdom, M. Fischer, H. Rüden, and J. Wenger 2 (1987) 1–7. Eatough, D.J., C.L. Benner, J.M. Bayona, G. Richards, J.D. Lamb, M.L. Lee, E.A. Lewis, and L.D. Hansen: Chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke. 1. Gas-phase acids and bases; Environ. Sci. Technol. 23 (1989) 679–687. Eatough, D.J., C.L. Benner, R.L. Mooney, D. Bartholomew, D.S. Steiner, L.D. Hansen, J.D. Lamb, M.L. Lee, E.A. Lewis, and N.L. Eatough: Gas and particle phase nicotine in environmental tobacco smoke; Proc. 79th Ann. Mtg. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., Minneapolis, MN, 5 (1986) Paper 86–68–5. Eatough, D.J., C.L. Benner, H. Tang, V. Landon, D. Richards, F.M. Caka, J. Crawford, E.A. Lewis, L.D. Hansen, and N.L. Eatough: The chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke. III. Identification of conservative tracers of environmental tobacco smoke; Environ. Internat. 15 (1989) 19–28 Eatough, D.J., L.D. Hansen, and E.A. Lewis: The chemical characterization of environmental tobacco smoke; in: Environmental tobacco smoke, edited by D.J. Ecobichon and J.M. Wu, Proc. Internat. Symp. at McGill University, Montreal PQ, 1989, Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA (1990) 3–39. Eatough, D.J., L.D. Hansen, and E.A. Lewis: The chemical characterization of environmental tobacco smoke; Environ. Tech. 11 (1990) 1071–1085. Eberhardt, H.-J.: The biological degradation of nicotine by nicotinophilic microorganisms; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1995) 119–129. Eberhardt, H.-J.: The regulation and biochemical action of natural fungicides in tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1995) 157–170. Eberheim A.: Qualifizierung von HalbleiterGassensoren für die Detektion spezifischer organischer Rauchgaskomponenten [Qualification of semiconductors for the detection of specific organic gas components in smoke]; Ph.D. Thesis, Natural Science, Justus-LiebigUniversität Gießen, 2003. Eble, A.S.: Migration and delivery of levulinic acid in cigarettes; R&DM, 1987, No. 167, November 2, see www. rjrtdocs.com 506489046 -9052. Eble, A.S.: The effects of migration and elution on menthol delivery in cigarettes; in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical and Chemical Processes Occurring in a Burning Cigarette. Edited by D.E. Townsend, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC (1987) 261–279, see www.rjrtdocs. com 506502327 -2345. Eble, A.S., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: Fate of vanillin during smoking; R&DM, 1985, No. 3, January 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503852593 -2600. Eble, A.S., F.W. Best, and C.C. Morrison: Delivery and elution of menthol from cigarettes; R&DM, 1987, No. 153, October 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506488505 -8514. Eble, A.S. and M. Montoya: Delivery of nicotine and menthol from thread-labeled cigarettes; R&DM, 1987, No. 125, August 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506487894 -7907. Eble, A.S. and T.S. Sink: Migration and delivery of menthol in aging cigarettes; R&DM, 1987, No. 152, October 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506488487 -8504.
1108a. Ecobichon, D.J. and J.M. Wu (Editors); Environmental tobacco smoke; Proc. Internat. Symp. at McGill University, 1989, Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA (1990). 1109. Eda, S. and K. Kato: An arabinoxyloglucan isolated from the midrib of the leaves of Nicotiana tabacum; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 351–357. 1110. Edmunds, F.S. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Constituents of cigarette smoke. IX. The pyrolysis of polyenes and the formation of aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Chem. Soc. (1965) 2892–2897, 2898–2900. 1111. Edreva, A., B. Blancard, R. Delon, P. Bonnet, and P. Ricci: Biochemical changes in B-cryptogein-elicited tobacco: A possible basis of acquired resistance; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 53–59. 1112. Edwards, T.H.: Isolation of essential oils from flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1970, No. 41, September 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001061 -1081. 1112a. Egan, H., R. Preussmann, I.K. O’Neill, G. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch (Editors): Environmental carcinogens, selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983). 1113. Egri, L.: Untersuchung über die Alkaloide einiger Tabaksorten mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Erforschung der Biosynthese von Nornikotin [Study of the alkaloids in several tobacco types with special consideration of the research on the biosynthesis of nornicotine]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie (1957) 19–24. 1114. Egri, L.: The chemical and physical factors in the nicotine reduction of tobaccos; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 205–206. 1115. Ehmke, H. and G. Neurath: Einfluss des Feuchtigkeitsgehaltes von Cigaretten auf die Zusammensetzung des Rauches. II. Phenole [The influence of tobacco moisture content on the composition of mainstream smoke yield. II. Phenols]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 205–208. 1116. Ehrenstein, M.: New developments in the chemistry and biochemistry of tobacco; Arch. Pharm. 268 (1930) 430–433. 1117. Ehrhardt, J.D., L. Hirth, and G. Ourisson: Étude des triterpènes tétracycliques des feuilles de tabac. Présence de cycloarténol; absence de lanostérol [Study of the tetracyclic triterpenes in tobacco leaf. Presence of cycloartenol; absence of lanosterol]; Compt. Rendu Acad. Sci. 260 (1965) 5931–5934. 1118. Ehrismann, O.: Untersuchungen über Nikotin un die Entnikotinisierung des Tabakrauches. II [Studies on nicotine and the denicotinization of tobacco smoke. II]; Z. Hyg. Infektionskrankh. 112 (1931) 698–707. 1119. Ehrismann, O. and G. Abel: The carbon monoxide content of cigarette smoke; Z. Hyg. Infektionskrankh. 116 (1934) 4–10. 1120. Einolf, W.N., R.N. Ferguson, and J.F. Whidby: Isolation and identification of 2,2,6-trimethyl-4-piperidone, an artifact produced by the reaction of cigarette smoke condensate and acetone; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 37, 1976, p. 27; Einolf, W.N., R.N. Ferguson, J.F. Whidby, and J.F. DeBardeleben: Isolation and identification of 2,6-dimethyl- and 2,2,6-trimethyl-4-piperidone, artifacts produced by the reaction of cigarette smoke condensate and acetone; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 208–213.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1304
11/24/08 2:39:37 PM
1305
Bibliography
1121. Einolf, W.N. and W.F. Kuhn: Philip Morris Tobacco Company document; 6908 Ann. Rept. - Smoke condensate studies; see, http://tobaccodocuments.org/product_ design/2024840799 -0877.html. 1121a. Ekanayake, A., R.L. Wickremasinghe, and H.D.S. Liyanage: Studies on the mechanism of herbicidal action of N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine; Weed Res. 19 (1979) 39. 1121b. El-Bayoumy, K., E.J. LaVoie, S.S. Hecht, E.A. Fow, and D. Hoffmann: The influence of methyl substitution on the mutagenicity of nitronaphthalenes and nitrobiphenyls; Mutation Res. 81 (1981) 143–153. 1122. El-Bayoumy, K., M. O’Donnell, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: The influence of tobacco nitrate on aromatic amines and nitro-aromatics in cigarette smoke; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 36, 1984, p. 19. 1123. El-Bayoumy, K., M. O’Donnell, and D. Hoffmann: Determination of aromatic amines in sidestream smoke by gas chromatography; in: Environmental carcinogens. Method of analysis and exposure measurement. Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 81 (1987) 269–277. 1124. El-Bayoumy, K., M. O’Donnell, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: On the analysis of 1-nitronaphthalene, 1-nitropyrene, and 6-nitrochrysene in cigarette smoke; Carcinogenesis 6 (1985) 505–507. 1124a. Elder, J.F. Jr, B.M. Gordon, and M.S. Uhrig: Complex mixture analysis by capillary-to-capillary column heartcutting GC/MS; R&DM, 1986, No. 105, July 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506471714 -1722; J. Chromat. Sci. 24 (1986) 26–33. 1124b. Elhag, G.A. and D.P. Bourque: Chloroplast ribosomal protein L27: Isolation and sequence analysis of cDNA clones from Nicotiana tabacum; Biochemistry 31 (1992) 6856–6864. 1125. Elia, V.J., E.E. Menden, and H.G. Petering: Cadmium and nickel: Common characteristics of lettuce leaf and tobacco cigarette smoke; Environ. Lett. 4 (1973) 317–324. 1126. Elinder, C.G., T. Kjellstrom, B. Lind, L. Linnman, M. Piscator, and K. Sundstedt: Cadmium exposure from smoking cigarettes: Variations with time and country where purchased; Environ. Res. 32 (1983) 220–227. 1127. Elkins, P.D., T.J. Sheets, and R.B. Leidy: Transfer of disulfoton and three metabolites in mainstream cigarette smoke; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 21, 1982, p. 11; Tob. Sci. 27 (1983) 142–145. 1127a. Ellington, J.J., P.F. Schlotzhauer, and A.I. Schepartz: Quantitation of tobacco lipids: Analysis of serial samples of flue-cured tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 255–268; Quantitation of hexaneextractable liquids in serial samples of flue-cured tobaccos; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 270–273. 1127b. Elliott, J.M.: Nutrition; Recent Adv. Tob. Res. Inaugural Vol. (1974) 17–38. 1128. Elliott, B.B.: The determination of organic and inorganic sulfur in processed tobacco and hydrogen sulfide in the smoke: Analytical methods and results;
1128a.
1128b.
1129.
1130.
1131.
1132.
1133.
1134.
1135.
1136.
1137.
1138.
RDR, 1960, No. 14, April 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500934679 -4694. Elliott, B.B., M.E. Long, and J.D. Shiffert: A method for the extraction and quantitative determination of glucose, fructose and sucrose in tobacco; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper 19, 1954, p. 6. Ellis, C.L., R.H. Cox, C.H. Callicutt, S.W. Laffoon, K.F. Podraza, and J.I. Seeman: The effect of ingredients added to tobacco in a commercial Marlboro Lights cigarette on FTC nicotine yield, “smoke pH”, and Cambridge filter trapping efficiency; CORESTA 1999 Conf., Innsbruck, Austria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper ST2, p. 11; The effect of ingredients, including ammonia compounds, on the FTC nicotine yield and “smoke pH” of a commercial Marlboro Lights cigarette; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper 45, 1999, p. 44. Elmenhorst, H.: Phenol content in successive puffs smoke condensate; CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964). Elmenhorst, H.: Vorversuche zur Bestimmung des Gehalts von Polonium-210 in Rauchkondensat und Cigaretten [Preliminary experiments on the estimation of the polonium-210 content of smoke condensate and cigarettes]; Mtg. Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie (1965) pp. 1–2. Elmenhorst, H.: Nachweis von Maltol in Cigarettenrauch [Detection of maltol in cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 70–73. Elmenhorst, H.: Sauren und Phenolen in der “Semivolatile” Fraktion des Rauches von Blend, Virginia-, Burley-, und Orient-Cigarettes [Acids and phenols in the “semivolatile” fraction of the smokes from blended-, Virginia-, burley-, and Oriental-tobacco cigarettes]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 182–188. Elmenhorst, H.: Nachweis von Methylcyclopentenolon und Äthylcyclopentenolon in Cigarettenrauch und Latakiatabak [Detection of methylcyclopentenolone and ethylcyclopentenolone in cigarette smoke and Latakia tobacco]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 205–209. Elmenhorst, H.: Dihydro-G-pyrones in tobacco smoke. Identification of 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-6-methyl-4Hpyran-4-one in cigarette smoke; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S05, 114–115. Elmenhorst, H.: Determination of naphthalenes in Latakia tobacco; 7th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Manila, The Philippines, 1980, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1980: Paper S05, 120–121. Elmenhorst, H. and G. Grimmer: Polycyclische Kohlenwasserstoffe aus Zigarettenrauchkondensat. Eine Methode zur Fraktionierung grosser Mengen für Tierversuche [Polycyclic hydrocarbons from cigarette smoke condensate. A method of fractionation of large quantities for animal experiments]; Z. Krebsforsch. 71 (1968) 66–73. Elmenhorst, H. and H.-P. Harke: Ŭber die Bilanz des Stickstoffes im Cigarettenrauch [On the balance of nitrogen in cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 283–286. Elmenhorst, H. and G. Nicolaus: Dihydro-G-pyrone im Tabakrauch. Nachweis von 2,3-Dihydro-5-hydroxy-6 -methyl-4H-pyran-4-one in Rauch von Cigaretten aus Burley-, Virginia-, und Orienttabaken [Dihydro-G-pyrones
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1305
11/24/08 2:39:37 PM
1306
1139.
1140.
1141.
1142.
1143.
1144.
1145.
1145a.
1146.
1147.
1148.
1148a.
1148b.
1149.
1149a.
1150.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
in tobacco smoke. Detection of 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy6-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one in the smoke from burley-, Virginia-, and Oriental-tobacco cigarettes]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1979) 39–47. Elmenhorst, H. and G. Reckzeh: Aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe im Tabakrauch [Aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 180–204. Elmenhorst, H. and G. Schultz: Flüchtige Inhaltsstoffe des Tabakrauches. Die chemischen Bestandteille der GasDampf-Phase [Volatile components of tobacco smoke. The chemical components of the gas-vapour phase]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 90–123. Elson, L.A. and T.E. Betts: Sugar content of the tobacco and pH of the smoke in relation to lung cancer risks of cigarette smoking; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1885–1890. Elson, L.A., T.E. Betts, and R.D. Passey: The sugar content and the pH of the smoke of cigarette, pipe, and cigar tobaccos in relation to lung cancer; Int. J. Cancer 9 (1972) 666–675. Emami, I., K. Alexandrov, H. Vezinc, and C. Rolando: New filters based on natural polyphenols scavenge efficiently free-radicals in cigarette smoke; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST22, p. 167. Entwhistle, I.D. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Alkenes in cigarette smoke condensate; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1965) 269–271. Entwhistle, I.D. and R.A.W. Johnstone: Constituents of cigarette smoke. IX. The isolation and synthesis of acenaphthylenes and monocyclic polyolefins; J. Chem. Soc. (1968) 1818–1822. Environmental Health Center: IAQ Fact Sheet: Formaldehyde; Updated September 30, 1998, see http:// www.nsc.org/ehc/indoor/formald.htm. Environmental Protection Agency: Second annual report on carcinogens; National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC, NTP 81–43 101–102 (1981). Environmental Protection Agency: Maleic hydrazide: Notification of issuances of notice of intent to suspend pesticide registration; Fed. Reg. 46 (No. 179) (1981) 45999–46000. Environmental Protection Agency: Environmental tobacco smoke: A guide to workplace smoking policies; Draft Document EPA/400/6–90/004 (June 25 1990). Environmental Protection Agency: Health effects of passive smoking: Assessment of lung cancer in adults and respiratory disorders in children; Draft Document EPA/600/6–90/006A (May 1990). Environmental Protection Agency: Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: Lung cancer and other disorders; Draft Document EPA/600/6–90/006B (May, 1992). Enzell, C.R.: Terpenoid components of leaf and their relationship to smoking quality and aroma; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 2 (1976) 32–60. Enzell, C.R.: Recent progress in the chemistry of sun cured tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 37–77. Enzell, C.R.: Isoprenoid flavor components of tobacco and their formation; in: Mechanisms in
1151.
1152.
1153.
1154.
1155.
1156.
1157.
1157a.
1157b.
1158.
1159.
1160.
1161.
1162.
1163.
1164.
tobacco carcinogenesis, Banbury Report 23, edited by D. Hoffmann and C.C. Harris, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1986) 163–178. Enzell, C.R., S.O. Almqvist, and A.J. Aasen: CORESTA 1974 Symp., CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1974 Spec. Edition: p. 140. Enzell, C.R., J. Arnarp, J. Bielawski, B.M. Dahlin, O. Dahlman, and T. Pettersson: A mass spectral study of alkyl 3-hydroxy-4-pyrones; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 66, 1990, p. 45. Enzell, C.R., D. Bergstedt, T. Dalhamn, and W.H. Johnson: Tobacco chemistry. 4. Chemical and ciliotoxic studies of smoke from freeze-dried tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 41–50. Enzell, C.R., D. Bergstedt, T. Dalhamn, and W.H. Johnson: Tobacco chemistry. 8. Chemical and ciliotoxic studies of smoke from heat-treated tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 96–105. Enzell, C.R., B. Kimland, and L.E. Gunnarsson: Tobacco chemistry. 5. Norsolanesene, a C44-isoprenoid hydrocarbon from tobacco; Tetrahedron Lett. 22 (1971) 1983–1986. Enzell, C.R. and I. Wahlberg: Leaf composition in relation to smoking quality and aroma; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 6 (1980) 64–122. Enzell, C.R., I. Wahlberg, and A.J. Aasen: Isoprenoids and alkaloids of tobacco; Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturstoffe 34 (1977) 1–79. Enzell, C.R., I. Wahlberg, and R. Ryhage: Mass spectra of tobacco isoprenoids; Mass Spectrometry Rev. 3 (1984) 395–438. Epstein, S.S., J.J. Andrea, J. Forsyth, and N. Mantel: The null effect of antioxidants on the carcinogenicity of 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene to mice; Life Sci. 6 (1967) 225–233. Ergle, J.D.: A method for screening the profile of phenolics in mainstream smoke by gas chromatography; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 72, 2002, p. 64. Erickson, M., D. Lakings, A. Drinkwine, and J. Spigarelli: Quantitative analysis of N-nitrosodiethanolamine by high performance liquid chromatography thermal energy analyzer detection; J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 36 (1985) 213–222. Ermaloeva-Makovskaya, A.P., L.A. Pertsov, and D.K. Popov: Polonium-210 content of tobacco; Gig. I Sanitar. 30(12) (1965) 40–43. Essenberg, J. M.: Cigarette smoke and the incidence of primary neoplasm of the lung in albino mice; Science 116 (1952) 561–562. Essenberg, J.M., M. Horowitz, and E. Gaffney: The incidence of lung tumors in albino mice exposed to the smoke from cigarettes low in nicotine content; West. J. Surg. Obst. Gynecol. 63 (1955) 265–267. Essenberg, J. M., A.M. Leavitt, and E. Gaffney: The effect of arsenic in tobacco on primary neoplasms of the lungs of albino mice; West. J. Surg. Obst. Gynecol. 64 (1956) 35–36. Esterle, J.G. and A.R. Campbell: The effect of moisture content of tobacco on phenol filtration and delivery; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 35, 1964, p. 53.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1306
11/24/08 2:39:38 PM
1307
Bibliography
1165. Eudy, L.W. and C.R. Green: Analytical method for the determination of phenylacetic acid in tobacco and tobacco smoke; R&DM, 1985, No. 21, March 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505108099 -8110. 1166. Eudy, L.W., D.L. Heavner, M.W. Stancill, J.S. Simmons, and B.C. McConnell: Measurement of selected constituents of environmental tobacco smoke in a Winston-Salem NC restaurant; R&DM, 1988, No. 228, August 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506536022 -6026. 1167. Eudy, L.W., D.L. Heavner, M.W. Stancill, J.S. Simmons, J.S. Scott, B.C. McConnell, and T.C. DeLuca: Measurement of selected constituents of environmental tobacco smoke in two Winston-Salem NC restaurants; R&DM, 1988, No. 229, August 31, see www.rjrtdocs. com 507039634 -9655. 1168. Eudy, L.W., M.W. Stancill, and T.C. DeLuca: Identification and measurement of volatile organic compounds in a Winston-Salem office building using combined adsorption/thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; R&DM, 1988, No. 231, August 31, see www. rjrtdocs.com 507039673 -9704. 1169. Eudy, L.W., F.A. Thome, D.L. Heavner, C.R. Green, and B.J. Ingebrethsen: Studies of the vapor-particulate distribution of environmental nicotine by selected trapping and detection methods; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 38, 1985, p. 20, see www.rjrtdocs. com 512314429 -4429; R&DM, 1986, No. 35, March 19, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504935901 -5931; Proc. 79th Ann. Mtg. Air Pollution Control Assoc., Minneapolis, MN 5 (1986) Paper 86–38–7. 1170. Evans, W.H., N.C. Thomas, M.C. Boardman, and S.J. Nash: Relationships of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon yields with particulate matter (water and nicotine free) yields in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; Sci. Total Environ. 136 (1993) 101–109. 1170a. Fagerson, I.S.: Thermal degradation of carbohydrates; J. Agr. Food Chem. 17 (1969) 747–750. 1171. Falk, H.L., S. Goldfein, and P. Steiner: The products of cholesterol at 360°C and their relation to carcinogens; Cancer Res. 9 (1949) 438–447. 1172. Falk, H.L. and P. Kotin: The experimental production of hydrocarbons in simulated cigarette smoking: Their analysis and quantitation; Progress Report No. 1, December 14, 1955, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/xxt6aa00; Falk, H.L.: The experimental production of hydrocarbons in simulated cigarette smoking: Their analysis and quantitation; Progress Report No. 2, February 1-November 20, 1956, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/uxt6aa00. 1173. Falk, H.L., P. Kotin, and A. Mehler: Polycyclic hydrocarbons as carcinogens for man; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 8 (1964) 721–730. 1173a. Falk, H.L., P. Kotin, and W. Rowlette: The response of mucus-secreting epithelium and mucus to irritants; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 106 (1963) 583–608. 1174. Falk, H.L., P. Kotin, and S. Thompson: Inhibition of carcinogenesis. The effect of hydrocarbons and related compounds; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 9 (1964) 169–179. 1175. Falk, H.L., H.M. Tremer, and P. Kotin: Effect of cigarette smoke and its constituents on ciliated mucussecreting epithelium; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 23 (1959) 999–1012. 1175a. Fannin, F.F., X. Li, H.R. Burton. E. D’Angelo, and L. Bush: Headspace and TSNA changes with cured
1175b.
1176.
1177.
1177a.
1177b.
1177c.
1177d.
1178.
1179.
1180.
1180a.
powdered tobacco in short time storage; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 29, 2005, p. 34. Fannin, F.F., X. Li, E. D’Angelo, and L. Bush: TSNA changes with cured powdered tobacco; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 39, 2006, pp. 40–41. Farone, W.A.: The manipulation and control of nicotine and tar in the design and manufacture of cigarettes: A scientific perspective; Money and Investing Update, pp. 1–10 (March 19, 1996). Farrar, L.G., J.R. Stokely, and M.R. Guerin: Polonium-210 in commercial cigarette smoke condensate; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 33, 1976, p. 25. Fay, J.R., L.R. Perry, L.A. Kanerva, C.C. Sigman, and C.T. Helmes: Inhibitors of chemical carcinogenesis; Document prepared in 1984, revised in 1985 for Sci. Coordinator Environ. Cancer, NCI, Bethesda, MD (1985) 1–96. Federal Trade Commission: Cigarettes: Testing for tar and nicotine content; Fed. Register 32 (1967) 11178; Pillsbury, H.C., C.C. Bright, K.J. O’Connor, and F.W. Irish: Tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 52 (1969) 458–462. Federal Trade Commission: Federal Trade Commision to Congress for 1996: Pursuant to the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act; Washington, DC (1998). Felton, K.S. and M.G. Knize, Heterocyclic amine mutagens/Carcinogens in foods; in: Chemical mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, edited by C.S. Cooper and P.L. Grover, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (1990) 471–502; Felton, K.S., M.G. Knize, C. Wood, B.J. Wuebbles, S.K. Healy, D.H. Stuermer, L.F. Bjeldanes, B.J. Kimble, and F.T. Hatch: Isolation and characterization of new mutagens from fried ground beef; Carcinogenesis 5 (1984) 95–102. Ferguson, R.N., J.F. Whidby, E.B. Danders, R.J. Levins, T. Katz, J.F. DeBardeleben, and W.N. Einoff: Isolation and identification of 2,3-dimethyl-6-(4,8,12trimethyldecyl)-1,4-naphthoquinone from tobacco and tobacco smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 30, 1977, p. 16; Tetrahedron Lett. (1978) 2645–2648. Ferri, E.S. and E.J. Baratta: Polonium-210 in tobacco products and human tissues; Radiolog. Hlth. Data Rpts. (1966) 485–488. Ferri, E.S. and E.J. Baratta: Polonium-210 in tobacco, cigarette smoke and selected human organs; Pub. Hlth. Rpts. 81 (1966) 121–127. Fieser, L.F.: 2-Hydroxy-1,4-anthraquinone; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 50 (1928) 465–474; The reduction potentials of various phenanthrenequinones; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51 (1929) 3101–3111; The potentials of some unstable oxidation-reduction systems; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 52 (1930) 4915–4940; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 53 (1931) 5204; Fieser, L.F. and E.M. Dietz: The reduction potentials of some higher benzologues of the quinones; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 53 (1931) 1128–1133; Fieser, L.F. and M. Fieser: The tautomerism of the aminonaphthoquinones; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56 (1934) 1565–1578; Fieser, L.F. and M.A. Peters: The potentials and the decomposition reactions of ortho quinones in acid solution; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 53 (1931) 793–805; The addition of diazomethane and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1307
11/24/08 2:39:38 PM
1308
1180b.
1181. 1182. 1183.
1184.
1184a.
1185.
1186.
1187.
1188.
1189.
1190.
1190a.
1191.
1192.
1193.
1194.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
some of its derivatives to alpha-naphthoquinone; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 53 (1931) 4080–4093. Fieser, L.F.: Theory of the structure and reactions of aromatic compounds; Chapter 3 in: Organic chemistry: An advanced treatise, edited by H. Gilman, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY (1942) 117–213, see 158–174. Fieser, L.F.: Chemical carcinogenesis; Arthur Stoll Festschriffte (1957) 489–498. Fieser, L.F.: More on smoking and health; Chemistry 1964(3) 18–19. Fieser, L.F.: Discussion on the hypothesis by M.F. Carroll on the occurrence of ketene in tobacco smoke; Biochem. J. 92 (1) Back Cover. Fieser, L.F. and E.M. Dietz: [Synthesis of benz[a]anthracene and dibenz[a,h]anthracene]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 62 (1929) 1827–1833. Fieser, L.F. and M. Fieser: Natural products related to phenanthrene; Third edition, Rheinhold Publishing Corporation, New York, NY (1949) pp. 157–159. Figuères, G. and L. de Hys: Effects of physical and chemical parameters of cigarettes on cadmium transfer to smoke; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 56, 1995, pp. 51–52. Filin-Koldakov, B.V. and L.P. Popova: Determination of acids in tobacco smoke by nonaqueous potentiometric titration; Izvest. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zavednii Pishch. Tekhnol. 1960(5) 165–169. Filk, H., E. Stürmer and A. Loeser: Untersuchungen über den Gehalt von Zigarettenrauch an Nikotin [Investigation on the content of nicotine in cigarette smoke]; Arzneimittelforschung 4 (1954) 367–368. Finnegan, J.K., P.S. Larson, and H.B. Haag; Studies on cigarette smoke irritation. II. The role of nicotine; Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 65 (1947) 200–202. Finster, P., J. Hollweg, E. Kausch, and U. Burmeiste: Automatische Tabakuntersuchung mittels Fliessinjektionaanalyse (FIA) [Automated tobacco investigation using flow-injection analysis (FIA)]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1988) 105–118. Firmenich: Solanone derivatives present in burley tobacco essential oil; U.S. Patent Application (1973) (Private communication). Fischer, E., J.A. Schmidt, W.H. Kalus, and R. Schelenz: Cesium-137 and strontium-90 from nuclear weapon fallout using tobacco as an example; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 176 (1983) 27–31. Fischer, S., A. Castonguay, M. Kaiserman, B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in Canadian cigarettes; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. (1990) 63–568. Fischer, S. and B. Spiegelhalder: Improved method for the determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) in tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 145–153. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, J. Eisenbarth, and R. Preussmann: Investigations on the origin of tobaccospecific nitrosamines in mainstream smoke of cigarettes; Carcinogenesis 11 (1990) 723–730. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Influence of smoking parameters on the delivery of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in cigarette smoke: A contribution to relative risk evaluation; Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 1059–1066.
1195. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in mainstream smoke of West German cigarettes: Tar alone is not a sufficient index for the carcinogenic potential of cigarettes; Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 169–173. 1196. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Preformed tobacco-specific nitrosamines in tobacco: Role of nitrate and influence of tobacco type; Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 1511–1517. 1197. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in European and USA cigarettes; Arch. Geschwulstforsch. 60 (1990) 169–177. 1198. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Tabakspezifische Nitrosamine im Hauptstromrauch deutscher Zigaretten. Der Kondensatgehalt reicht als alleiniger Schadstoffparameter nicht aus [Tobaccospecific nitrosamines in the mainstream smoke of German cigarettes. The condensate content is not sufficient as the sole toxic substance parameter]; Lebensm. Chem. 44 (1990) 50–52. 1199. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: No pyrosynthesis of N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) from nicotine; in: Effects of nicotine on biological systems, edited by F. Adlkofer and K. Thurau, Birkhauser Verlag, Boston, MA (1991) 103–107. 1200. Fischer, S., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in commercial cigarettes: Possibilities for reducing exposure; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco smoke, and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 489–493. 1201. Fishel, J.B.: The determination of moisture in the total solids of cigar smoke; 13th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 13, Paper No. 17, 1959, p. 10; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 198–200. 1202. Fishel, J.B. and J.F. Haskins: Composition of cigarette smoke. The gaseous phase; Ind. Eng. Chem. 41 (1949) 1374–1376. 1203. Fitts, S.B. Jr and J.L. Keaton: Nicotine content – Cigarette smoke – Filter and unfilter brands; RDM, 1964, No. 3, January 13. 1204. Fix, R.J. and F.D. Jordon: Indirect analysis of cocoa in tobacco products via the determination of theobromine; R&DM, 1990, No. 34, February 14, see www.rjrtdocs. com 508381660 -1679. 1205. Fleig, C.: Does carbon monoxide contribute to the toxicity of tobacco smoke? Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 146 (1908) 776–779. 1205a. Florin, I., L. Rutberg, M. Curvall, and C.R. Enzell: Screening of tobacco smoke constituents for mutagenicity using the Ames’ test; Toxicology 15 (1980) 219–232. 1206. Flory, C.M.: The production of tumors by tobacco tars; Cancer Res. 1 (1941) 262–276. 1206a. Flower, K.C.: Agronomy and physiology. C. Field practices; Chapter 4C in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 76–103. 1207. Fluck, E.R. and D. Johnson: A study of the toxicity of acetylpyrazine; RDR, 1968, No. 28, July 11, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500968929 -8937.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1308
11/24/08 2:39:38 PM
1309
Bibliography
1208. Fokker, A.P.: The hygienic significance of tobacco smoke; Nederland. Tijdschr. Geneeskunde 20 (1884) 737–740. 1209. Forbes, J.C. and H.B. Haag: Hygroscopic agents in cigaret smoke; Ind. Eng. Chem. 30 (1938) 717–718. 1210. Forbes, W.F.: Study of the role of free radicals in tobacco smoke carcinogenesis; Ann. Rpt. 1965–1966, Natl. Cancer Inst., Canada (1966) 85–86. 1211. Forbes, W.F., J.C. Robinson, and G.F Wright: Free radicals of biological interest. I. Electron spin resonance spectra of tobacco smoke condensates; Can. J. Biochem. 45 (1967) 1087–1098. 1212. Forehand, J.B., C.E. Badgett, and F.E. Resnik: Automated determination of calcium in tobacco using glyoxalbis(hydroxyanil); Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 50–52. 1213. Forehand, J.B., G.L. Dooly, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of PAHs, phenols and aromatic amines in particulate-phase cigarette smoke using simultaneous distillation and extraction as a sample clean-up step; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 51, 1999, p. 48. 1214. Forehand, J.B. and S.C. Moldoveanu: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons generation from pyrolysis of tobacco phytosterols; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 28, 1998, p. 28. 1215. Formella, K., T. Braumann, and H. Elmenhorst: The influence of different filter parameters on the semivolatile composition of mainstream smoke; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 18, 1990, p. 20; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 15 (1992) 123–128. 1216. Fountain, D.J.: Fast gas chromatograph analysis for select nitrosamines in tobacco and mainstream cigarette smoke extracts; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 54, 2001, p. 52. 1217. Fowles, J. and M. Bates: The chemical constituents in cigarettes and cigarette smoke: Priorities for harm reduction; A Report to the New Zealand Ministry of Health, March 2000, pp. 1–65, see www.ndp.govt.nz/tobacco/ documents/tobaccochem.pdf. 1218. François, R.: Enquiry into the use of glycerine in tobacco; Inst. Tech. Recherches des Corps SRAS (1962) pp. 1–7. 1219. Frank, R., H.E. Braun, M. Holdrinet, K.I. Stonefield, J.M. Elliot, B.F. Zilkey, L. Vickery, and H.H. Cheng: Metal contents and insecticide residues in tobacco soils and cured tobacco leaves collected in Southern Ontario; Tob. Sci. 21 (1977) 74–80. 1219a. Frank, R., H.E. Braun, K.I. Stonefield, J.M. Elliot, and B.F. Zilkey: Insecticide residues and metal contents in flue-cured tobacco and tobacco soil of Southern Ontario, 1976–1978; Tob. Sci. 24 (1980) 136–140. 1219b. Frank, R., H.E. Braun, P. Suda, B.D. Ripley, B.S. Clegg, R.P. Bayaert, and B.F. Zilkey: Pesticide residues and metal contents in flue-cured tobacco and tobacco soils of Southern Ontario, Canada 1980–1985; Tob. Sci. 31 (1987) 40–45. 1219c. Frank, R., H.E. Braun, B.S. Clegg, R.P. Bayaert, and W. Johnson: Pesticide residues and metal contents in fluecured tobacco, Ontario, 1986–1988; Tob. Sci. 35 (1991) 28–31. 1220. Franke, J.E., C.B. Bennett, R.E. Davis, H.V. Thomsen, and K.S. Johnston: Determination of nicotine in tobacco:
1221. 1221a.
1222.
1223.
1224.
1225.
1226.
1226a.
1227.
1228.
1229.
1230.
1231.
1232.
1233.
Collaborative study; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 251–265. Frankenburg, W.G.: Advances in enzymology, Vol. 6, Interscience, New York, NY (1946) p. 344. Frankenburg, W.G.: Determination of alkaloids and alkaloid transformation products; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 2, 1948. Frankenburg, W.G.: Chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke: A comprehensive method of analysis of the nitrogen compounds of tobacco and some changes occurring during fermentation of cigar tobacco; 6th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 6, Paper No. 8, 1952, p. 8. Frankenburg, W.G. and A.M. Gottscho: Nitrogen compounds in fermented cigar leaves; Ind. Eng. Chem. 44 (1952) 301–305. Frankenburg, W.G. and A.M. Gottscho: Chemistry of tobacco fermentation. I. Conversion of alkaloids. B. The formation of oxynicotine; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 5728–5730. Frankenburg, W.G., A.M. Gottscho, and A.A. Vaitekunas: Biochemical conversion of some tobacco alkaloids; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 9–13. Frankenburg, W.G., A.M. Gottscho, A.A. Vaitekunas, and R.M. Zacharius: Chemistry of tobacco fermentation. I. Conversion of the alkaloids. C. The formation of 3-pyridyl propyl ketone, nicotinamide and N-methylnicotinamide; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 5730–5732. Frankenburg, W.G. and A.A. Vaitekunas: Chemistry of tobacco fermentation. I. Conversion of the alkaloids. D. Identification of cotinine in fermented leaves; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79 (1957) 149–151. Franzke, C., G. Ruick, and M. Schmidt: Untersuchungen zum Schwermetallgehalt von Tabakwaren und Tabakrauch [Investigation of the heavy metals in tobacco products and tobacco smoke]; Nahrung 21 (1977) 417–428. Fredrickson, J.D.: Some volatile constituents of cellulose smoke; RDR, 1959, No. 15, June 24, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500933433 -3458. Fredrickson, J.D.: Isolation of squalene from a hexane extract of burley tobacco; RDM, 1961, No. 43, May 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500600762 -0765. Fredrickson, J.D.: Isolation of long-chained aliphatic esters of B-amyrin from Turkish and burley tobaccos; RDR, 1962, No. 41, December 11, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500939756 -9778; B-Amyrenyl esters of tobacco; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 11, 1966, p. 13, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 502264553 -4560. Fredrickson, J.D.: Preliminary study of the odorous constituents of flue-cured smoke condensate; RDM, 1962, No. 126, December 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612329 -2332. Fredrickson, J.D.: The study of burley smoke condensate. I. Preliminary survey of the odorous constituents of burley smoke condensate; RDR, 1962, No. 43, December 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500939793 -9793. Fredrickson, J.D.: The study of burley smoke condensate. II. The isolation of disubstituted maleic anhydrides from the strong acid fraction; RDR, 1963, No. 2, January 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961031 -1050.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1309
11/24/08 2:39:39 PM
1310
1234. Fredrickson, J.D.: Fractionation of extracts of Turkish tobacco; RDR, 1963, No. 5, January 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961080 -1115. 1235. Fredrickson, J.D.: The study of burley smoke condensate. III. Constituents of the strong acid fraction; RDR, 1964, No. 5, January 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963294 -3312. 1236. Fredrickson, J.D.: Personal communication on research project entitled Study of burley tobacco smoke condensate; RJRT Research Notebooks, 136701–50, 137851– 900, 139551–600, 141001–50, 145351–400, 147501–50, 149601–50, 152651–700, 160101–50 (17 March, 1965 6 February, 1967). 1237. Fredrickson, J.D.: Process for increasing the volume of tobacco; RDR, 1965, No. 3, January 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965533 -5569; Process for increasing the filling volume of tobacco. Addendum to RDR, 1965, No. 3; RDM, 1965, No. 58, August 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 502476759 -6762. 1238. Fredrickson, J.D., C.K. Chappell, and A. Rodgman: The preparation of reference 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones for ninety-one carbonyl compounds; RDR, 1959, No. 6, April 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933157 -3177. 1239. Fredrickson, J.D., C.K. Chappell, and A. Rodgman: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXX. Volatile aldehydic and ketonic constituents; RDR, 1963, No. 12, February 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961206 -1220. 1240. Freiesleben, E.R. and T.A. Smith: The determination of sulphur and chlorine in tobacco and tobacco smoke using the Wickhold apparatus; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 14, 1970, p. 9. 1240a. Fridman, E., J. Wang, Y. Iijima, J.E. Froehlich, D.R. Gang, J. Ohlrogge, and E. Pichersky: Metabolic, genomic, and biochemical analyses of glandular trichomes from the wild tomato species Lycopersicon hirsutum identify a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of methylketones; The Plant Cell 17 (2005) 1252–1267. 1241. Friedman, R.L. and W.J. Raab: Determination of tobacco humectants by gas liquid chromatography; Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 67–69. 1241a. Friesen, J.B. and E. Leete: Nicotine synthase: An enzyme from Nicotiana species which catalyses the formation of (S)-nicotine from nicotinic acid and 1-methyl-∆’-pyrrolinium chloride; Tetrahedron Lett. 31 (1990) 6295–6298. 1242. Frisch, A.F., B.W. Francis, M.K. Chavis, and R.W. Jenkins Jr: The fate of 5–14C-Altosid® in cigarette smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 14, 1977, p. 8. 1243. Frisch, A.F., B.W. Francis, M.K. Chavis, and R.W. Jenkins Jr: Cigarette smoke formation studies. VII. The fate of (5–14C)-methoprene in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 203–208. 1243a. Fromageot, P. and H. Perez-Milan: Reduction of sulfate to sulfite by tobacco leaf; Biochim. Biophys. Acta 32 (1959) 457–64. 1244. Fromm, F.: Die Bestimmung des Pyrrols im Tabak [Determination of pyrrole in tobacco]; Österr. Chemikerztg. 40 (1937) 434–437. 1245. Fromm, F.: On tobacco smoke; Science 104 (1946) 376. 1246. Frost, B.E., G. McKenna, and M.S. Williams: The measurement of benzo[a]pyrene in mainstream cigarette smoke; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 31, 1998, p. 29.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1247. Fujimori, T.: Chemical studies on the aroma constituents in burley tobacco; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 118 (1976) 85–118. 1248. Fujimori, T. and H. Kaneko: Studies on tobacco aroma; Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi 53 (1979) 95–121. 1249. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of R(-)-3-hydroxy-B-ionone from burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 38 (1974) 891–892. 1250. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of 3-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)furan (phytofuran) from burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 38 (1974) 2293–2294. 1251. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of 3-hydroxy-B-ionol from burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 39 (1975) 913–914. 1252. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: A new acetylenic diol, 3-hydroxy-7,8-dehydro-B-ionol, from burley Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 14 (1975) 2095. 1253. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of solavetivone from Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 16 (1977) 392. 1254. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, and M. Noguchi: Neutral volatile components of burley tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 317–325. 1255. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Kaneko, S. Sakamura, M. Noguchi, A. Furusaki, N. Hashika, and T. Matsumoto: Solanascone: A novel sesquiterpene ketone from Nicotiana tabacum. X-ray structure determination of its corresponding oxime; J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm. (1978) 563–564. 1256. Fujimori, T., R. Kasuga, H. Matsushita, and M. Noguchi: Neutral aroma constituents in burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 40 (1976) 303–315. 1256a. Fujioka, K. and T. Shibamoto: Determination of toxic carbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke; Environmental Toxicol. 21 (2006) 47–54. 1256b. Fukuda, Y., M. Ohme, and H. Shinshi: Gene structure and expression of a tobacco endochitinase gene in suspension-cultured tobacco cells; Plant Mol. Biol. Int. J. Fund. Res. Genet. Eng. 16 (1991) 1–10. 1257. Fukuzumi, T., H. Kaneko, and H. Takahara: Isolation of a (-)-2-isopropyl-5-oxohexanoic acid from Turkish tobacco leaves and absolute configuration of solanone; Agr. Biol. Chem. 31 (1967) 607. 1258. Fukuzumi, T., H. Takahara, H. Kaneko, and I. Onishi: Studies of the chemical constituents of tobacco leaves. I. Organic acids in Turkish tobacco; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 39 (1965) 199–203. 1259. Fukuzumi, T., H. Takahara, H. Kaneko, and I. Onishi: Studies of the chemical constituents of tobacco leaves. II. Isolation of 2-isopropylmalic acid from Turkish tobacco; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 39 (1965) 204–207. 1260. Fukuzumi, T., H. Takahara, H. Kaneko, and I. Onishi: Isolation of hydroxy acids from Turkish tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 39 (1965) 967–969. 1261. Furukawa, Y. and C. Tokura: Analytical methods for chemical components in tobacco smoke. II. Absorption spectrum and spectrophotometric determination of tobacco smoke tar; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 315–317. 1262. Furth, A. and W.R. Gustavson: The study of nickel in relation to smoking and lung cancer; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 7 (1966) 86.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1310
11/24/08 2:39:39 PM
Bibliography
1262a. Fuwei, X., W. Ming, and X. Jianping: The determination of VOCs in environmental tobacco smoke; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 53, 2005, p. 47. 1263. Gabelya, Y.O. and G.I. Kipriyanov: The content of pectin in tobacco; Ukrainskii Khem. Zhur. 4 (1929) 37–43; The dry distillation of tobacco; Ukrainskii Khem. Zhur. 4 (1929) 45–63, see Chem. Abstr. 24 (1930) 916. 1264. Gager, F.L. Jr, J.W. Nedlock, and W.J. Martin: Tobacco additives and cigarette smoke. Part I. Transfer of D-glucose and sucrose and their degradation products to smoke; Carbohydrate Res. 17 (1971) 327–333. 1265. Gager, F.L. Jr, J.W. Nedlock, and W.J. Martin: Tobacco additives and cigarette smoke. Part II. Organic gas-phase products from D-glucose and sucrose; Carbohydrate Res. 17 (1971) 335–339. 1266. Gaines, T.P.: Automated determination of starch in fluecured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 164–166. 1267. Gaines, T.P. and W.J. Meudt: Adaptation of the iodine stain method for determining starch in flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 130–133. 1268. Gains, L.H. and G.A. Long: The fate of radiolabeled tartaric acid in burning cigarettes; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 34, 1994, p. 44. 1269. Gains, L.H. and R.S. Marmor: Sensory evaluation of sidestream odor using transfer testing methodology; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1987) 53–59. 1270. Gains, L.H., J.R. Reid, and P.D. Schickedantz: Radiolabeling synthesis and resolution of L(+)-tartaric acid and its distribution in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 22, 1991, p. 24. 1270a. Gaines, T.P. and J.P. Miles: Protein composition and classification of tobacco; J Agr. Food Chem. 23 (1975) 690–694. 1271. Gaivoronschi, B.S., P. Marinescu, and V. Petrute: Contributions to nicotine determination by gas chromatography; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S044, 113–114. 1271a. Gallaher Group: PLC Table 1 - Ingredients added to tobacco, Pipe Tobacco Products; see www.gallaher-group. com/products/table1_display.asp?product_type=PIPE. 1272. Galuskinova, V.: 3,4-Benzpyrene determination in the smoky atmosphere of social meeting rooms and restaurants. A contribution to the problem of the noxiousness of so-called passive smoking; Neoplasma 11 (1964) 465–469. 1273. Gan, H., N.C. Hall, and C.R. Taylor: Collection and determination of trace metals in sidestream cigarette smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 78, 2003, pp. 67–68. 1274. Gaisch, H. and U. Nyffeler: The measurement of thiol reactivity in cigarette smoke; CORESTA Smoke Study Group Mtg., Copenhagen, Denmark, 1975. 1274a. Gao, J., S.-R. Kimz, J. M. Lee, and G. An: Nucleotide and protein sequences of 60s ribosomal protein L17 from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum); Plant Physiol. 103 (1993) 1027–1028. 1275. Garcia, E.Y., M. Manahan, and T. Nazario: The deactivation of cigarette smoke against its carcinogenic agents; J. Philippine Med. Assoc. 35 (1959) 114–118.
1311
1275a. Garner, R.C., C.N. Martin, and D.B. Clayson: Carcinogenic aromatic amines and related compounds; Chapter 4 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 175–276. 1276. Garner, W.W.: The relation of nicotine to the burning quality of tobacco; USDA, Bureau of Plant Industry, Bull. No. 141 (1909) 5–16. 1277. Gavrilov, N.J. and A.V. Koperina: Tabakchemie. IV. Analyse des Tabakrauches [Research on tobacco chemistry. IV. Analysis of tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 231 (1931) 25–32. 1278. Geilmann, W., K. Bayermann, K.H. Neeb, and R. Neeb: Thallium, ein Regelmassig Vorhandenes Spurenelement in Tierischen und Pflanzlichen Organismus [Thallium, an ordinary trace element present in animal and plant organisms]; Biochem. Z. 333 (1960) 62–70. 1279. Geisinger, K.R., T.C. Jones, and I. Schmeltz: Further studies of pyrolytic products from some tobacco leaf acids; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 89–90. 1280. Gelder, S.: High performance liquid chromatographic determination of nine N-methylcarbamates in tobacco; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 50, 1994, p. 56. 1280a. Gelhaye, E., N. Rouhier, J. Gérard, Y. Jolivet, J. Gualberto, N. Navrot, P.-I. Ohlsson, G. Wingsle, M. Hirasawa, D.B. Knaff, H. Wang, P. Dizengremel, Y. Meyer, and J.-P. Jacquot: A specific form of thioredoxin h occurs in plant mitochondria and regulates the alternative oxidase; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (2004) 14545–14550. 1281. Gellhorn, A.: The cocarcinogenic activity of cigarette tar; Cancer Res. 18 (1958) 510–517. 1282. Gelpi, E. and J. Oró: Ubiquity of hydrocarbons in nature: Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of the hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; J. Chromatog. Sci. 8 (1970) 210–213. 1282a. GenBank (tobacco): GenBank (tobacco): Information and data pertinent to a specific GenBank tobacco item, e.g., GenBank D16206 may be found on the Internet by searching (Google) for the item GenBank D16206 tobacco. The search yields an article by Hirose et al. (1656b). Similar searches for GenBank Z14080 tobacco and GenBank L02124 tobacco yield pertinent references by Marty et al. (2481a) and Klotz and Lagrimini (2131a), respectively. For other references see www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html. 1282b. Genschik, P., A. Durr, and J. Fleck: Differential expression of several E2-type ubiquitin carrier protein genes at different developmental stages in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana sylvestris; Molecular Gen. Genetics 244 (1994) 548–556. 1282c. George, T.W.: Aspects of the fluid dynamics of cigarette smoke filtration; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 24, 1965, p. 35. 1283. George, T.W.: Selective removal of components of tobacco smoke by filtration; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 237–248. 1284. George, T.W. and C.H. Keith: The selective filtration of tobacco smoke; Chapter XI in: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis, edited
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1311
11/24/08 2:39:39 PM
1312
1284a.
1284b.
1285.
1286.
1287.
1288.
1289.
1290.
1291.
1292.
1293.
1294.
1295.
1296.
1297.
1298.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) 577–622. Georgiev, S.: Effect of filter length and moisture content of filter cigarettes on the selective retention of nicotine and phenols in tobacco smoke; Nauch. Tr. Vissh. Khranit. Vkusova Prom. Plovdiv. 15 (Pt.I) (1969) 25–37. Georgiev, S.: Effect of fiber width on the chemical composition of cigarette smoke; Nauch. Tr. Vissh. Khranit. Vkusova Prom. Plovdiv. 15 (Pt.I) (1969) 39–48. Gerstenberg, B. and M. Speck: Determination of catechol in cigarette smoke condensate by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis with an automated precolumn sample preparation; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 239–253. Gil-Av, E. and J. Shabtai: Precursors of carcinogenic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; Nature 197 (1963) 1065–1066. Gilbert, J.A.S. and A.J. Lindsey: Polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke: The amounts held in stubs and ash; Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 642–645. Gilbert, J.A.S. and A.J. Lindsey: Polycyclic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke: Pipe smoking experiments; Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 646–648. Gilbert, J.A.S. and A.J. Lindsey: The thermal decomposition of some tobacco constituents; Brit. J. Cancer 11 (1957) 398–402. Giles, J.A. III: Turkish tobacco. Characterization of A2-levantenolide; RDR, 1961, No. 43, August 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500937280 -7290; Giles J.A. III and J.N. Schumacher: Turkish tobacco. I. The isolation and characterization of A- and B-levantenolide; Tetrahedron 14 (1961) 246–251. Giles, J.A. III: A procedure for the isolation of stigmasterol and B-sitosterol from tobacco; RDM, 1961, No. 23, March 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500600645 -0648. Giles, J.A. III: Manganese dioxide as a cigarette smoke filter; RDM, 1965, No. 46, July 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603119 -3125. Giles, J.A. III: Historical review of nicotine and particulate matter in the smoke of selected cigarette brands; RDM, 1969, No. 34, May 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500604777 -4823. Giles, J.A. III: Collaborative study on the determination of propylene glycol, glycerine, and ethylene glycol in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 53 (1970) 655–658. Giles J.A. III and R.H. Cundiff: Collaborative study of the GLC determination of glycerine and propylene glycol in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 52 (1969) 753–756. Giles, J.A. III and H.L. Gilleland: Determination of humectants in tobacco; RDR, 1970, No. 24, May 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501000546 -0569. Giles, J.A. III and J.N. Schumacher: Turkish tobacco. Isolation and characterization of dehydrosclareolide; RDR, 1958, No. 7, April 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500932281 -2299. Giles, J.A. III and J.N. Schumacher: Turkish tobacco. Isolation and characterization of 12A-hydroxy-13epimanoyl oxide; RDR, 1960, No. 39, December 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500935072 -5089; Giles, J.A. III, J.N. Schumacher, S.S. Mims, and E. Bernasek: Turkish tobacco. II. Isolation and characterization of 12A-hydroxy13-epimanoyl oxide; Tetrahedron 18 (1962) 169–176.
1299. Giles, J.A. III and J.N. Schumacher: Turkish tobacco. I. The isolation and characterization of A- and B-levantenolide; Tetrahedron 14 (1961) 246–251. 1300. Giles, J.A. III, J.N. Schumacher, and G.W. Young: Turkish tobacco. II. The isolation and characterization of A2-levantenolide; Tetrahedron 19 (1963) 107–110. 1301. Giles, J.A. III and B.N. Sullivan: Modified determination of nicotine and water in total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; RDM, 1969, No. 36, May 22, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500604830 -4833. 1302. Gilleland, H.L. and L.A. Lyerly: Triacetin content of cigarette smoke as a function of the age of the filter; RDR, 1966, No. 25. June 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500967284 -7291. 1303. Gilleland, H.L. and L.A. Lyerly: Gas chromatographic determination of phenol in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1967, No. 24, August 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500968072 -8084. 1304. Gillman, I.G. Jr, J.E. Fossett, N. Finkel, and R.D. Bereman: Investigations into a rapid method for determining tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and volatile nitrosamines in sidestream tobacco smoke using LC/ MS/MS with positive ion electrospray; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 36, 2002, p. 41. 1305. Gillman, I.G. Jr, and K.A. Wagner: The rapid and quantitative analysis of tobacco specific N-nitrosamines in mainstream tobacco smoke using LC/MS/MS with positive ion electrospray; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 56, 2001, p. 53. 1305a. Giovannozzi-Sermanni, G.: Analytical research on Nicotiana tabacum by paper chromatography. III. Organic acids in three varieties of subtropical tobacco during curing and fermentation; Il Tabacco 59 (1955) 329–335; IV. Amino acids in three varieties of subtropical tobacco during curing and fermentation; Il Tabacco 59 (1955) 335–343; V. Variation of some chemical components of Maryland tobacco due to topping and curing methods; Il Tabacco 60 (1956) 400–412. 1305b. Giovannozzi-Sermanni, G.: Analytical research on Nicotiana tabacum by paper chromatography. Il Tabacco 61 (1957) 349–357. 1306. Giovannozzi-Sermanni, G. and N. Carugno: Analytical investigations on tobacco by means of vapour phase chromatography. 2. Effect of fermentation on the gaseous components of smoke. Studies on Kentucky tobacco; Il Tabacco 62 (1958) 265–268; Analytical research on tobacco by means of gas chromatography. II. Effect of fermentation on the gas substances in smoke. Studies on “Kentucky” tobacco; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 550–552. 1307. Gladding, R.N., W.B. Wartman, and H.E. Wright: The isolation of a phytadiene from aged burley tobacco; 11th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 11, Paper No. 12, 1957; Identification of neophytadiene in burley tobacco and in cigarette smoke; J. Org. Chem. 24 (1959) 1358–1359. 1308. Gladding, R.N. and H.E. Wright: Paraffin waxes of burley tobacco and their isolation; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 81–82. 1309. Glennie, C.W. and J.C. Nel: The polyphenols of fluecured tobacco; Agrochemophysica (1973) 75–76. 1310. Glock, E.: The determination of keto-, mono- and dicarboxylic acids in tobacco and cigarette smoke; 11th Tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1312
11/24/08 2:39:39 PM
Bibliography
1311.
1312.
1313
1314.
1315.
1316.
1317.
1317a.
1318.
1318a.
1319.
1320.
Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 11, Paper No. 13, 1957, p. 10. Glock, E.: Rapid color test for estimating nornicotine in tobacco: Application of the 1,3-indanedione procedure to disc samples of single leaves; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 33–40. Glock, E. and C.O. Jensen: Enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in tobacco seedlings; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 1, 1956, pp. 1–2. Glock, E., R.K. Odland, N.L. Bodenhamer, and R.W. Phillips: Composition of cigar sidestream smoke: The neutral pentane-soluble fraction; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 20, 1968, p. 12. Glock, E. and T.H. Vaughan: Quantitative chromatographic separation of pyridine and some pyridine derivatives from cigarette smoke; 13th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 13, Paper No. 18, 1959, p. 10; Quantitative separation of some pyridine compounds by paper chromatography; 37th Ann. Mtg., VA. Acad. Sci. (1959); Virginia J. Sci: 10 (1959) 271–272. Glock, E. and M.P. Wright: Colorimetric determination of nornicotine with 1,3-indanedione; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 15, 1961, pp. 7–8. Glock, E. and M.P. Wright: The relation of nornicotine in tobacco to cigarettes smoke aroma and composition; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 22, 1962, pp. 13–14. Glock, E. and M.P. Wright: Determination of nornicotine in tobacco and smoke by the 1,3-indanedione spectrophotometric method. Comparison with an improved chromatographic-ultraviolet spectrophotometric procedure; Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 246–251. Glucanase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term glucanase tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: van Eldik, G.J., K. Litiere, J.J. Jacobs, M. Van Montagu, and M. Cornelissen: Silencing of beta-1,3-glucanase genes in tobacco correlates with an increased abundance of RNA degradation intermediates; Nucleic Acids Res. 26 (1998) 5176–5181. Search for other glucanases in tobacco provides similar references. Golaz, P., A. Girardet, and R. Regamey: Considérations sur la récupération des constituants de la fumée de cigarettes [Considerations of the isolation of cigarette smoke constituents]; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. 50 (1959) 18–39. Gold, L.S., T.H. Slone, and B.N. Ames: Overview of the carcinogenic potency database; in: Handbook of carcinogenic potency and genotoxicity databases, edited by L.S. Gold and E. Seiger, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1997, pp. 661–685; What do animal cancer tests tell us about human cancer risk: Overview of analyses of the carcinogenic potency database; Drug Metabolism Reviews 30 (1998) 359–404. Goldfarb, T., E.R. Gritz, M.E. Jarvik, and I.P. Stolerman: Reactions to cigarettes as a function of nicotine and “tar”; Clin. Pharmacol. Therap. 19 (1976) 767–772. Goldfarb, T., M.E. Jarvik, and S.D. Glick: Cigarette nicotine content as a determinant of human smoking behavior; Psychopharmacology 17 (1970) 89–93.
1313
1320a. Goldman, M.H.S., M. Pezzotti, J. Seurinck, and C. Marian: Developmental expression of tobacco pistilspecific genes encoding nove1 extensin-like proteins; The Plant Cell 4 (1992) 1041–1051. 1321. González, J.M. and J. Sarabia: An interesting compound of the sidestream tobacco smoke: Hexamethylenetetramine; Proc. Smoke Group Papers, CORESTA Cong, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain (1992) 127–141. 1322. Good, B.W., M.E. Parrish, and D.R. Douglas: Volatile phase smoke profiling using gas chromatographic techniques; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 15, 1980, p. 8. 1323. Gordin, H.H., T.A. Perfetti, and R.W. Hawley: Nicotine just noticeable difference study of full flavor low “tar” and ultra low “tar” non-menthol 85 mm products; Tob. Sci. 32 (1988) 62–65. 1324. Gordon, B.M., M.F. Borgerding, and R.S. Dunn: Simultaneous determination of nicotine, nornicotine, myosmine, anabasine, and anatabine in tobacco; R&DM, 1981, No. 27, July 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500609480 -9492. 1325. Gordon, B.M. and W.M. Coleman III: Determination of vinyl chloride, ethylene oxide, and propylene oxide in fresh mainstream smoke via gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 63, 2003, p. 58. 1326. Gordon, B.M., W.M. Coleman III, J.F. Elder Jr, J.A. Giles, D.S. Moore, C.E. Rix, M.S. Uhrig, and E.L. White: Analysis of flue-cured tobacco essential oil using multidimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry and matrix isolation Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 7, 1987, p. 15. 1327. Gordon, B.M. and G.H. Greene: Determination of nicotine, nornicotine, and other secondary amine alkaloids in tobacco; RDM, 1980, No. 29, September 16, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500617977 -7985; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 25, 1981, p. 13. 1328. Gordon, B.M., M.S. Uhrig, M.F. Borgerding, W.M. Coleman III, J.F. Elder Jr, J.A. Giles, D.S. Moore, C.E. Rix, and E.L. White: Analysis of flue-cured tobacco essential oil by hyphenated analytical techniques; J. Chromat. Sci. 26 (1988) 174–180. 1329. Gori, G.B. (Editor): Report No. 1. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. The first set of experimental cigarettes; DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76-905 (1976). 1330. Gori, G.B. (Editor): Report No. 2. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. The second set of experimental cigarettes; DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76-1111 (1976). 1331. Gori, G.B.: Low risk cigarettes: A prescription; Science 194 (1976) 1243–1246. 1332. Gori, G.B. (Editor): Report No. 3. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. The third set of experimental cigarettes; DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 77-1280 (1977). 1333. Gori, G.B. (Editor): Report No. 4. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. The fourth set of experimental cigarettes; DHEW Publ. (NIH) (March, 1980). 1334. Gori, G.B., S.P. Battista, P.S. Thayer, M.R. Guerin, and C.J. Lynch: Chemistry and in vitro bioassay of smoke from experimental filter cigarettes; DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76-1076 (1976).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1313
11/24/08 2:39:40 PM
1314
1334a. Gori, G. B., N. L. Benowitz, and C. J. Lynch: Mouth versus deep airways absorption of nicotine in cigarette smokers; Pharmacol. Biochem. Behavior 25 (1986) 1181–1184. 1334b. Gori, G.B. and F.G. Bock (Editors): A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980). 1334c. Gorrod, J.W. and P. Jacob III (Editors): Analytical determination of nicotine and related compounds and their metabolites; Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999). 1334d. Gorrod, J.W. and J. Wahren (Editors): Nicotine and related alkaloids: Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion; Chapman and Hall, London (1993). 1334e. Goubet, F., L.N. Council, and D. Mohnen: Identification and partial characterization of the pectin methyltransferase “homogalacturonan-methyltransferase” from membranes of tobacco cell suspensions; Plant Physiol. 116 (1998) 337–347. 1334f. Graebe, C. and H. Caro: Über Acridin [About acridine]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 3 (1870) 746–747. 1335. Graham, B., K. Wagner, and D. Champaneri: Analysis of ammonia and cyanide in cigarette smoke, total alkaloids, ammonia, nitrates, and reducing sugars in tobacco filler with an automated spectrophotometer; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 56, 2002, p. 54. 1336. Graham, J.F.: Calculation of retention values and selectivity factors for dual filters; Beitr. Tabakforsvh. 3 (1965) 225–232. 1337. Graham, J.F.: Identification of 5-methylfurfural in cigarette smoke; Chem. Ind. (1966) 1924–1925. 1338. Graham, J.F.: A fraction trapping and transfer device for the analysis of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 43–51. 1339. Graham, J.F.: Cigarette smoke analysis by computerGLC; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 220–228. 1340. Graham, J.F. and D.P. Clay: The use of dilute smoke extracts for the analysis of semi-volatiles: Application to the study of triacetin release from acetate filters; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 56, 1975, p. 36. 1341. Graham, J.H.: On the trail of nicotine during the smoking process; Am. J. Pharm. 106 (1934) 256–261. 1342. Grainger, G.F.: Determination of major vapor phase compounds in smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 22, 1967, p. 13. 1343. Grant, S.J.: Catalytic and non-catalytic additives for the removal of carbon monoxide from cigarette smoke; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 54, 1980, p. 28. 1344. Grant, S.J. and D.T. Westcott: Catalytic and non-catalytic additives for the removal of carbon monoxide from cigarette smoke; 7th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Manila, the Philippines, 1980, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1980: Paper S06, 121–122. 1345. Grasso, P.: Carcinogens in food; Chapter 19 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second edition; American Chemical Society Monograph 182, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 1205–1239.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1346. Graves, H.: Determination of water in Cambridge-filtered cigarette smoke employing single puff gas chromatographic analysis; RDM, 1967, No. 35, July 10, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500613388 -3394. 1347. Graves, H.: Rapid analysis of individual component(s) of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1968, No. 8, February 1, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500968585 -8587. 1348. Green, C.R.: Smoke composition: MTP dyed and MTP control cigarettes; RDM, 1973, No. 33, December 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606318 -6341. 1349. Green, C.R.: Smoke composition: MTP cigarettes L7137A and L7137B; RDM, 1974, No. 4, February 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503651627 -1650. 1350. Green, C.R.: Smoke composition: L7081A and L7081B cigarettes; RDM, 1974, No. 10, April 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606498 -6523. 1351. Green, C.R.: Some relationships between tobacco leaf and smoke composition; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 426–470. 1352. Green, C.R.: Neutral oxygenated compounds in cigarette smoke and their possible precursors; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 3 (1977) 94–120. 1352a. Green, C.R.: Personal communication (1980). 1353. Green, C.R.: A discussion of smoke generation and analytical procedure in “The contribution of low tar cigarettes to environmental tobacco smoke”; J. Anal. Toxicol. 14 (1990) 261. 1354. Green, C.R. and F.W. Best: Smoke composition: Comparison of J-10 and J-10T smokes with a tobacco control; RDR, 1974, No. 6, August 26, see www.rjrtdocs. com 510691758 -1783. 1355. Green, C.R. and F.W. Best: Smoke composition: Comparison of the smoke condensates from regular Marlboros, Omega 100s, and mentholated Winchester (L7257); RDM, 1974, No. 19, August 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606646 -6664. 1356. Green, C.R. and F.W. Best: Pyrolysis products of licorice; RDM, 1974, No. 20, August 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508476955 -6960. 1357. Green, C.R. and F.W. Best: Pyrolysis products of various smoking materials; RDM, 1975, No. 1, January 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003513 -3531. 1358. Green, C.R., F.W. Best, C.C. Morrison, and F.W. Conrad Jr: Studies of the distribution of vanillin to mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 35, 1984, p. 19; R&DM, 1986, No. 36, March 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505124652 -4669; An analytical study of vanillin as a cigarette flavor; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper ST07, 69–70. 1359. Green, C.R., F.W. Best, C.C. Morrison, and L.W. Eudy: An analytical study of phenylacetic acid as a cigarette flavor; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 34, 1986, p. 19; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: Paper ST06, 93–94. 1360. Green, C.R., F.W. Best, M.P. Newell, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and C.W. Miller: Semi-quantitative comparison of smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1314
11/24/08 2:39:40 PM
Bibliography
1361.
1362.
1363.
1364.
1365.
1366.
1367.
1368.
1369.
1370.
1371.
1372.
1373.
1374.
from J-10:tobacco and tobacco cigarettes; RDR, 1976, No. 4, February 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004048 -4075; 510628992 -9019. Green, C.R., D.A. Colby, P.J. Cooper, R.A. Heckman, L.A. Lyerly, and F.A. Thome: Advances in analytical methodology of leaf and smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 6 (1980) 123–183. Green, C.R. and F.W. Conrad Jr: Stability of smoke nicotine in cellulose acetate filters; R&DM, 1981, No. 16, May 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510664339 -4346. Green, C.R., F.W. Conrad Jr, K.A. Bridle, and M.F. Borgerding: A liquid chromatographic procedure for analysis of nicotine on cellulose acetate filters; CORESTA 1982 Symp., CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper S03, 12–14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510648277 -8278; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 11–16. Green, C.R., F.W. Conrad Jr, M.F. Dube, J.L. Harris, and A.L. Angel: Dry cigarette chemistry; R&DR, 1982, No. 5, April 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501006152 -6219. Green, C.R., M.F. Dube, F.W. Best, A.L. Angel, and F.W. Conrad Jr: Smoke chemistry comparison of Camel Lights versus cigarettes with 50% carbonized filler; R&DM, 1982, No. 22, June 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512090623 -0641. Green, C.R., M.F. Dube, C.W. Miller, F.W. Best, and T.M. Reavis: Effects of steaming, ammoniation, and denicotinization on burley tobacco and smoke composition; RDR, 1980, No. 2, April 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511309414 -9453. Green CR, M.F. Dube, C.W. Miller, M.D. Wallace, F.W. Best, and T.M. Reavis: Smoke composition: Comparison of smokes from Winston and Marlboro collected at 35and 65-ml puff volume; RDR, 1979, No. 2, November 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501005673 -5760. Green CR, M.F. Dube, and T.R. Young: Effect of porous belt, steaming, ammoniation, and a modified denicotinization process on flue-cured tobacco and smoke composition; R&DR, 1981, No. 1, January 12, see www.rjrtdocs. com 511309298 -9333. Green, C.R., J.M. Martin, and A. Rodgman: Effect of treatment of tobacco with ammonia or various ammonium salts on the levels of pyridines and pyrazines in smoke; RDR, 1976, No. 3, January 29, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501003985 -4047; 514902128 -2190. Green, C.R., C.W. Miller, and M.D. Wallace: Effects of steaming, ammoniation, and denicotinization on fluecured tobacco and smoke composition; RDR, 1978, No. 8, November 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511309334 -9384. Green, C.R., M.P. Newell, F.W. Best, N.C. Sanders, and M.D. Wallace: Short-term Winston improvement smoke studies. I; RDR, 1978, No. 5, September 13, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501005432 -5523. Green, C.R., T.A. Perfetti, P.P. Mangan, and C.J. Mereschak: Nicotine to menthol ratio; R&DM, 1983, No. 17, April 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661110 -1118. Green, C.R. and A. Rodgman: The Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference: A half century forum for advances in analytical methodology of tobacco and its products; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 22 (1996) 131–304. Green, C.R. and J.N. Schumacher: Cigar blend cigarettes with dyed and undyed overwraps; RDM, 1971, No. 31, June 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500605579 -5624.
1315
1375. Green, C.R. and J.N. Schumacher: Smoke composition: Puffed vs. unpuffed tobacco; RDR, 1971, No. 7. February 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001966 -1998. 1375a. Green, C.R., J.N. Schumacher, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and A. Rodgman: Comparisons of the composition of tobacco smoke and the smokes from various tobacco substitutes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2007) 258–289. 1375b. Green, C.R., J.N. Schumacher, and A. Rodgman: The expansion of tobacco and its effect on cigarette mainstream smoke properties; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2007) 317–345. 1376. Green, C.R. and D.E. Townsend: The effect of casing on the organoleptic perception of straight burley cigarettes; R&DM, 1984, No. 18, March 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503555117 -5123. 1377. Green, C.R., L. Vestal, and J.N. Schumacher: The Sutton Research Corporation smoking material. V. Investigation of the cigarette smoke from the Sutton smoking material, 1969, January 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001439 -1463; see also Part V in: Rodgman, A., J.D. Fredrickson, E.S. Hickman, M.P. Newell, J.N. Schumacher, C.R. Green, F.W. Best, G.W. Spence, R.E. Shackelford, E.D. Harper, and L.L. Vestal: The Sutton Research Corporation smoking material; RDR, 1970, No. 48, December 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001173 -1175, 501001176 -1189, 501001190 -1289, 501001290 -1406, 501001407 -1438, 501001439 -1463, 501001464 -1468, 501001469 -1475, 501001526 -1539, 501001540 -1591, 501001592 -1772, 501001773 -1783, 501001784 -1788. 1378. Green, C.R., L. Vestal, and J.N. Schumacher: The investigation of the cigarette smoke from Celanese smoking material; RDR, 1969, No. 32, September 19, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500969764 -9795. 1379. Green, J.D., K. Chalmers, and P.J. Kinnard: The transfer of tobacco additives to cigarette smoke. Examination of the possible contribution of pyrolysis products to mainstream smoke composition; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 283–288. 1380. Greenberg, L.A. and D. Lester: The absorption of nicotine in smoking; J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 104 (1952) 162–167. 1381. Greene, F.L. and A.M. Palmer: Organic gas phase profile of cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 42, 1969, p. 23. 1382. Greene, G.H., R.H. Cundiff, and A.H. Laurene: Development of methods for determination of tobacco humectants in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1963, No. 47, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961947 -1961. 1383. Greene, G.H., A.H. Laurene, and J.P. Clingman: Determination of tobacco humectants by vapor chromatography; RDR, 1963, No. 11, February 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961191 -1204. 1384. Greene, G.H. and L.A. Lyerly: Gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in “nicotine poor” tobacco; RDM, 1974, No. 22, November 22, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500606677 -6684. 1385. Greene, J.M. and W.S. Caldwell: Chemical and microbiological changes during flue-curing of NK-149 tobacco. 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 29, 1994, pp. 40–41, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514931655 -1675; 521118168 -8168.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1315
11/24/08 2:39:40 PM
1316
1386. Gregg, E., C. Hill, M. Hollywood, M. Kearney, K. McAdam, D. McLaughlin, S. Purkis, and M. Williams: The UK smoke constituents testing study. Summary of results and comparison with other studies; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 117–138. 1387. Gregory, L.P.: Polonium-210 in leaf tobacco from four countries; Science 150 (1965) 74–76. 1387a. Greiner, S., M. Weil, S. Krausgrill, and T. Rausch: A tobacco cDNA coding for cell-wall invertase; Plant Physiol. 108 (1995) 825–826. 1388. Griest, W.H. and M.R. Guerin: Influence of tobacco type on smoke composition; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 3 (1977) 121–144. 1389. Griest, W.H. and M.R. Guerin: Influence of tobacco type on smoke composition; NCI and US Energy R&D Admin. Conf. (1979) 1390. Griest, W.H., R.B. Quincy, and M.R. Guerin: Selected constituents in the smoke from domestic low “tar” cigarettes; Oak Ridge Natl. Laboratory Rpt. ORNL/TM-6144/ PI (1977). 1391. Griffin, H.R., M.B. Hocking, and D.G. Lowery: Arsenic determination in tobacco by atomic absorption spectrometry; Anal. Chem. 47 (1975) 229–233. 1392. Griffith, R.B.: The rapid determination of total alkaloids by steam distillation; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 130–137. 1393. Griffith, R.B. and R.N. Jeffrey: Improved steam-distillation apparatus: Application to determination of nicotine in green and dry tobacco; Anal. Chem. 20 (1948) 307–311. 1394. Griffiths, W.T., D.R. Trelfall, and T.W. Goodwin: Observations on the nature and biosynthesis of terpenoid quinones and related compounds in tobacco shoots; Europ. J. Biochem. 5 (1968) 124–132. 1395. Griffon, H. and J. Delga: On the arsenic content of several kinds of commercial tobaccos. Fate of arsenic during combustion; Ann. Pharm. Franc. 5 (1947) 343–352. 1395a. Grimm, B. and R. Tanaka: Manipulation of tocopherol content in transgenic plants; U.S. Patent No. 6,624,342 (September 9, 2003). 1396. Grimmer, G.: Eine Methode zur Bestimmung von 3,4Benzpyrene in Tabakrauchkondensaten [A method for the estimation of 3,4-benzpyrene in tobacco smoke condensate]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1961) 107–116. 1397. Grimmer, G.: Polycyclische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe - ihre Vorkommen und ihre Bestimmung [Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - Their occurrence and estimation]; Lebensmittelchem. Gericht. Chem. 35 (1981) 67–71. 1398. Grimmer, G.: Schadstoffe in der Umbegung des Menschen [Poisons in the human environment]; Deut. Apotheker Zeit. 38 (1981) 2030–2032, 2052, 2053. 1399. Grimmer, G.: Bilanzierung der Krebserzeugenden Wirkung von Emission aus Kraftfahrzeugen und Kohleöfen mit carcinogen-spezifischen Testen [Balancing the cancer-producing action of the emissions from motor vehicles and coal furnaces with carcinogen-specific tests]; Funktion. Biol. Med. 1 (1982) 29–38. 1400. Grimmer, G.: Environmental carcinogens: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - Chemistry, occurrence, biochemistry, carcinogenicity; CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (1983). 1401. Grimmer, G.: Eintrag, Monitoring und Bewertung der kanzerogenen Umweltbelastung durch polycyclische aromatische Kohlkenwasserstoffe [Collection, monitoring, and estimation of the carcinogenic environmental burden
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1402.
1403.
1404.
1405.
1406.
1406a.
1406b.
1407.
1407a.
1407b.
from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons]; GIT Fachz. Lab. 1 (1992) 12–21. Grimmer, G. and H. Böhnke: Bestimmung des Gesamtgehaltes aller polycyclischen aromatischen Kohlenwasserstoffe in Luftstaub und Kraftfahrzeugabgas mit der Capillar-Gas-Chromatographie [Estimation of the total content of all polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in air particles and motor vehicles exhaust gas with capillary gas chromatography]; Z. Anal. Chem. 261 (1972) 310–314. Grimmer, G., H. Böhnke, and H.P. Harke: Passive smoking: Measurement of concentration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rooms after machine smoking of cigarettes; Internat. Arch. Occup. Environ. Hlth. 40 (1977) 83–92. Grimmer, G., H. Böhnke, and H.P. Harke: Passive smoking: Intake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by breathing of cigarette smoke-containing air; Internat. Arch. Occup. Environ. Hlth. 40 (1977) 93–99. Grimmer, G., H. Brune, G. Dettbarn, J. Jacob, J. Misfeld, U. Mohr, K.W. Naujack, J. Timm and R. Wenzel-Hartung: Contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and other polycyclic aromatic compounds to the carcinogenicity of combustion source and air pollution; Environ. Sci. Res. 39 (1990) 127–140; Relevance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as environmental carcinogens; Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 339 (1991) 792–795. Grimmer, G., H. Brune, G. Dettbarn, K.W. Naujack, U. Mohr, and R. Wenzel-Hartung: Contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the carcinogenicity of sidestream smoke of cigarettes evaluated by implantation into the lung of rats; Cancer Lett. 43 (1988) 173–177. Grimmer, G., H. Brune, R. Deutsch-Wenzel, G. Dettbarn, and J. Misfeld: Contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the carcinogenic impact of gasoline engine exhaust condensate evaluated by implantation into the lungs of rats; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 72 (1984) 733–739; Grimmer, G., H. Brune, R. Deutsch-Wenzel, G. Dettbarn, J. Jacob, K.W. Naujack, U. Mohr, and H. Ernst: Contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitro-derivatives to the carcinogenic impact of diesel exhaust condensate evaluated by implantation into the lungs of rats; Cancer Lett. 37 (1987) 173–180. Grimmer, G., H. Brune, R. Deutsch-Wenzel, K.W. Naujack, J. Misfeld, and J. Timm: On the contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to the carcinogenic impact of automobile exhaust condensate evaluated by local application onto mouse; Cancer Lett. 21 (1983) 105–113. Grimmer, G., A. Glaser, and G. Wilhelm: Die Bildung von Benzo(a)pyren und Benzo(e)pyrene beim Erhitzen von Tabak in Abhängigkeit von Temperatur und Strömungsgeschwindigkeit in Luft- und Stickstoffatmosphäre [The formation of benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[e]pyrene during the heating of tobacco in correlation to temperature and flow rate in air and nitrogen atmospheres]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 415–421. Grimmer, G., J. Jacob, and K.W. Naujack: Characterization of methylene azaarenes in petroleum by capillary gas chromatography and mass spectrometry; Anal. Chem. 55 (1983) 2398–2404. Grimmer, G., J. Jacob, K.W. Naujack, G. Dettbarn, H. Brune, R. Deutsch-Wenzel, J. Misfeld, and J. Timm: Contribution of polycyclic aromatic compounds to the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1316
11/24/08 2:39:41 PM
1317
Bibliography
1408.
1409.
1410.
1410a.
1410b.
1411.
1412.
1413.
1414.
1415.
1416.
1416a.
carcinogenicity of flue gas from hard-coal-fired residential furnaces and characteristics of arenes (PAH), azaarenes, oxaarenes, and thiarenes; in: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, edited by M. Cooke and A.J. Dennis, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH (1984). Grimmer, G. and K.W. Naujack: Gas chromatographic determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sidestream smoke and indoor air; in: Environmental carcinogens: Methods of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 9, Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 81 (1987) 249–268. Grimmer, G., K.W. Naujack, and G. Dettbarn: Gas chromatographic determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aza-arenes, aromatic amines in the particle and vapor phase of mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes; Internat. Exptl. Toxicol. Symp. on Passive Smoking, Essen FRG (1986) pp. 1–19; Toxicol. Lett. 35 (1987) 117–124. Grimmer, G., D. Schneider, K.W. Naujack, G. Dettbarn, and J. Jacob: Intercept-reactant method for the determination of aromatic amines in mainstream tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1995) 141–156; in: Polycyclic aromatic compounds. Vol. 9, Overseas Publishers Association, Amsterdam BV; The Netherlands, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers SA (1996) 85–92. Grimmer, G., W. Stöber, J. Jacob, U. Mohr, K. Schoene, H. Brune, and J. Misfeld: Inventory and biological impact of polycyclic carcinogens in the environment; Exp. Path. 24 (1983) 3–13. Grimmett, M.R.: Advances in imidazole chemistry; in Advances in heterocyclic chemistry, edited by A.R. Katritzky and A.J. Boutton, Academic Press, New York, 12 (1970) 103–183. Grob, K.: Die Bestimmung des pH-Wertes und der Pufferungkapazität des Cigarettenrauches als RoutineMethode [A method for routine determination of the pH of tobacco smoke and for the determination of the buffering capacity of the smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1961) 97–100. Grob, K.: Zur Gaschromatographie des Cigarettenrauche. 1. Teile. Eine Methode zur Routineanalyse des GasDampf-Phase [The gas chromatography of cigarette smoke: Part 1. A method for routine analysis of the gas phase], Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 285–290. Grob, K.: Zur Gaschromatographie des Cigarettenrauche. 2. Teile. Verfeinerte Trennung mit Hilfe von Kapillarkolonnen [The gas chromatography of cigarette smoke. Part 2. An improved separation aided by capillary columns]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 315–323. Grob, K.: Gas chromatographic studies on cigarette smoke; Proc. Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Salisbury, Rhodesia, 1963 (1964) 564–572. Grob, K.: Gas chromatography of cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 28, 1964, pp. 43–45. Grob, K.: Gas chromatography of cigarette smoke. Part III. Separation of the overlap region of gas and particulate phase by capillary columns; J. Gas Chromatog. 3 (1965) 52–56. Grob, K.: Zur Gewinnung und Behandlung frischer Gasphase aus Cigarettenrauch. 2. Probleme der GasphasenUntersuchung [Recovery and processing of the fresh gas
1417.
1418.
1419.
1420.
1421. 1422. 1423.
1424.
1425.
1426.
1427.
1428.
1429.
1430. 1430a.
phase of cigarette smoke. 2. Problems with gas-phase studies]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 243–250. Grob, K.: Gas chromatography of cigarette smoke. Part IV. Separation on capillary columns; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 27, 1965, pp. 39–41. Grob, K.: Der Weg zur Ultraspurenanalyse mittels KapillarGaschromatographie und Massenspektrometrischanalyse der Tabakrauch: 1961–1971 [The way to trace analysis by means of capillary gas chromatography and mass spectometrtic analysis of tobacco smoke: 1961–1971]; Mitt. Lebensm. Untersuch. Hyg. 63 (1972) 23–32. Grob, K.: Zur Gaschromatographie des Cigarettenrauches. 4. Teil. Identifikationen mit Hilfe des Massenspektrometers [Gas chromatographic analyses of cigarette smoke. Part 4. Mass spectrometric analyses]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 403–408. Grob, K.: Gaseous components of tobacco smoke; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 215–220. VOID Grob, K.: High resolution G. C. analysis of cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1973) 248–252. Grob, K. and G. Grob: Methodik der Kapillar-GasChromatographie Hinweise zur vollen Ausnützung hochwertiger Säulen. I. Teil: Die Direkteinspritzung [Methodology of capillary gas chromatography with reference to the full use of high quality columns. I. Direct injection]; Chromatographia 5 (1972) 3–12. Grob, K. and G. Grob: Factors affecting the high resolution gas chromatographic analysis of the heavy part of cigarette smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 17, 1973, p. 11. Grob, K. and H.J. Jaeggi: Methodik der Kapillar-GasChromatographie Hinweise zur vollen Ausnützung hochwertiger Säulen. II. Teil: Handhabung und Betrieb [Methodology of capillary gas chromatography with reference to the full use of high quality columns. II. Manipulation and operation]; Chromatographia 5 (1972) 382–391. Grob, K. and J.A. Völlmin: GC-MS analysis of the “semivolatiles” of cigarette smoke; J. Chromat. Sci. 8 (1970) 218–220. Grob, K. and J.A. Völlmin: Analyse der “Semi-Volatiles” aus Cigarettenrauch mit Hilfe einer Kombination von hochauflösender Gaschromatographie und Massenspektrometrie [The determination of “semivolatiles” in cigarette smoke by the combination of gas chromatography with mass spectrometry]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 52–57. Groenen, P.J. and M.C. ten Noever de Brauw: Determination of volatile N-nitrosamines in the vapour phase of the smoke from various tobacco products; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 113–123. Groenen, P.J. and L.J. Van Gemert: Flame photometric determination of volatile sulphur compounds in smoke from various types of cigarettes; J. Chromatog. 57 (1971) 239–246. Gross, C.R. and O.A. Nelson: Arsenic in tobacco smoke; Am. J. Publ. Hlth. 24 (1934) 36–42. Grosset, J., Y. Meyer, Y. Chartier, S. Kauffmann, M. Legrand, and B. Fritig: Tobacco mesophyll protoplasts
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1317
11/24/08 2:39:41 PM
1318
1431.
1432.
1433.
1434.
1435.
1435a.
1436.
1437.
1438.
1439.
1440.
1441.
1442.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
synthesize 1,3-B-glucanase, chitinases, and “osmotins” during in vitro culture; Plant Physiol. 92 (1990) 520–527. Grossman, J.D., E.J. Deszyck, R.M. Ikeda, and A. Bavley: Study of the pyrolysis of solanesol; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 21, 1962, p. 13; Chem. and Ind. (1962) 1950–1951. Grossman, J.D., R.M. Ikeda, E.J. Deszyck, and A. Bavley: Mechanism of solanesol breakdown during pyrolysis; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 9, 1963, pp. 9–10; Nature 199 (1963) 661–663. Grossman, J.D. and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. II. Isolation and identification of stigmasterol from flue-cured leaves; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 115–116. Grunwald, C., D.L. Davis, and L.P. Bush: Cholesterol in cigarette smoke condensate; J. Agr. Food Chem. 19 (1971) 138–139. Guan, J.: Investigation of carbon monoxide and benzo[a] pyrene abatement in cigarette smoke through the application of lanthanum manganese oxide and manganese oxides; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 71, 2004, p. 66. Guan, J., J.D. Johnson, and F.R. Perini: Precursors to the pyrosynthesis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in cigarette smoke. II. Correlations involving potential precursor structures, dose response, measured PAH levels and thermal properties; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 91, 2005, pp. 69–70. Guérin, M.: Étude sur la pouvoir cocarcinogène du goudron de fumée de cigarette [Study of the cocarcinogenic property of the tar in cigarette smoke]; Bull. Assoc. Franc. Étude Cancer 48 (1961) 365–376. Guerin, M.R.: Chemical composition of cigarette smoke; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 191–204. Guerin, M.R.: Formation and physicochemical nature of sidestream smoke; in: Environmental carcinogens: Methods of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 9. Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Publ. No. 81 (1987) 11–23. Guerin, M.R.: Formation and general characteristics of environmental tobacco smoke; Air Pollution Control Assoc. Specialty Conf. on Combustion Process and the Quality of Indoor Environments, Niagara Falls, NY (1988). Guerin, M.R.: Environmental tobacco smoke; in: Organic chemistry of the atmosphere, edited by L.D. Hansen and D.J. Eatough, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1991) 79–119. Guerin, M.R., C.E. Higgins, and W.H. Griest: The analysis of the particulate and vapour phases of tobacco smoke; in: Environmental carcinogens: Methods of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 9. Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Publ. No. 81 (1987) 115–139. Guerin, M.R., C.E. Higgins, and R.A. Jenkins: Measuring environmental emissions from tobacco combustion:
1443. 1444.
1445.
1446. 1447. 1448.
1448a.
1449.
1450.
1451.
1451a.
1451b.
1452. 1453.
1454.
1455.
Sidestream cigarette smoke: Literature review; Atmos. Environ. 21 (1987) 291–297. Guerin, M.R. and R.A. Jenkins: Environmental tobacco smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 18 (1992) 95–114. Guerin, M.R., R.A. Jenkins, T.H. Gayle, C.E. Higgins, J.H. Moneyhun, R.S. Ramsey, and C.V. Thompson: Methodology for quantitating exposure to inhalable ambient tobacco smoke. Progress report #2; DOE Agreement No. ERD-85–471 (April 25, 1986). Guerin, M.R., R.A. Jenkins, and B.A. Tomkins: The chemistry of environmental tobacco smoke: Composition and measurement; Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL (1992). VOID VOID Guerin, M.R. and G. Olerich: Quantitative utility of the trimethylsilylation of smoke condensate and particulate matter; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 18, 1972, pp. 27–28. Guerin, M.R. and G. Olerich: Direct gas chromatographic determination of catechol in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 17–18. Guerin M.R., G. Olerich, and A.D. Horton: Routine gas chromatographic component profiling of cigarette smoke for the identification of biologically significant constituents; J. Chromat. Sci. 12 (1974) 385–391. Guerin M.R., G. Olerich, and R.B. Quincy: Multialiquot determination of phenol, cresols, glycerol, catechol, nicotine, and free fatty acids; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 56, 1974, p. 35. Guhlmann, A., J. Hollweg, and F. Seehofer: Bestimmung von Aldicarb-Rückständen in Tabak [Determination of the Aldicarb® residue in tobacco]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 87–91. Guillerm, R., R. Badré, and B. Vignon: Effets inhibiteurs de la fumée de tabac sur l’activité ciliare de l’épithélium respiratoire et nature des composants responsables [Inhibiting effect of tobacco smoke on epithelial ciliary activity and the nature of the responsible components]; Bull. Acad. Nat. Med. (France) (1961) 416–423. Guillerm, R., A. Saindelle, P. Faltot, and J. Hée: Étude chez la cobaye des effets broncho-moteurs de la fumée de cigarette et de quelques-uns de ses constituants [Study in the guinea pig of the bronchial motor effect of cigarette smoke and several of its components]; J. Physiol. 57 (1965) 619– 620; Action de la fumée de cigarette et de quelques-uns de ses constituants sur les résistances ventilatoires chez le cobaye [Action of cigarette smoke and several of its components on the ventilating resistance in the guinea pig]; Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. 167 (1967) 101–114. Gulovali, M.C. and G. Gunduz: Trace elements in Turkish tobacco; Kim. Muhendisligi 90 (1978) 4307. Gunther, F.A. and F. Buzotti: Occurrence, isolation and identification of polynuclear hydrocarbons as residues; Residue Rev. 9 (1965) 90–113. Gutenmann, W.H., C.A. Bache, D.J. Lisk, D. Hoffmann, and J.D. Adams: Cadmium and nickel in the smoke of cigarettes prepared from tobacco cultured on municipal sludge amended soil; J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 10 (1982) 423–431. Gutenmann, W.H., D.J. Lisk, D. Hoffmann, and J.D. Adams: Selenium in particulates and gaseous fractions of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1318
11/24/08 2:39:41 PM
1319
Bibliography
1456.
1457.
1458.
1459.
1460. 1461. 1462.
1463.
1463a.
1463b.
1464.
1465.
1466.
1467.
1468.
1469.
1469a.
1470.
smoke from cigarettes prepared from tobacco grown on fly ash amended soil; J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 12 (1983) 385–394. Gutenmann, W.H., D.J. Lisk, B.S. Shane, and D. Hoffmann: Selenium in mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes containing fly ash grown tobacco; Drug Chem. Toxicol. 10 (1987) 181–187. Guthrie, F.E.: The nature and significance of pesticide residues on tobacco and in tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 229–246. Guthrie, F.E. and T.G. Bowery: Thiodan and Telodrin residues in tobacco; J. Econ. Entomol. 55 (1962) 1017–1018. Guthrie, F.E., C.B. McCants, and H.G. Small: Arsenic content of commercial tobacco, 1917–1958; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 62–64. Guthrie, F.E. and T.J. Sheets: Pesticide residues on tobacco: A continuing problem; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 44–48. Guvernateur, G.C. III: Identification of furfuryl alcohol in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 63. Guvernator, G.C. III, P.L. Gager Jr, E.W. Robb, and A. Bavley: Electron capture detection of gas-chromatographed polycyclic hydrocarbons; J. Gas Chromatog. 3 (1965) 363–367. Gwynn, G.R.: Chlorophyll disappearance in yellow and green tobacco; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 141–143; Gwynn, G.R. and A.G. Hayes: Chlorophyll, agronomic and chemical characteristics of yellow tobacco; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 77–79; Gwynn, G.R. and W.F. McClure: Differences among tobacco varieties and breeding material in chlorophyll content during curing; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 1–3. Gwynn, R.H.: Studies on promotion of tumour development (co-carcinogenesis); Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 32 (1954) 171–172. Gwynn, R.H. and M.H. Salaman: Tests of tobacco products for tumour initiation and promotion in mouse skin; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 34 (1956) 279. Haag, H.B.: The physiological activity of cigarette smoke solutions as related to their nicotine content; J. Lab. Clin. Med. 25 (1940) 610–618. Haagen-Smit, A.J., M.F. Brunelle, and J. Hara: Nitrogen oxide content of smokes from different types of tobaccos; Arch. Ind. Hlth. 20 (1959) 399–400. Habermann, J.: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Zigarrenrauches [Contribution to the knowledge of cigar smoke]; HoppeSeyler’s Z. Physiol. Chem. 33 (1901) 55–125. Habermann, J.: Der Blausäuregehalt des Zigarrenrauches [The hydrocyanic acid content of cigar smoke]; HoppeSeyler’s Z. Physiol. Chem. 37 (1903) 1–17. Habermann, J.: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Zigarren- und Pfeifenrauches [Contribution to the knowledge of cigar and pipe smoke]; Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 40 (1904) 148–161. Habermann, J. and R. Ehrenfeld: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Zigarrenrauches [Contribution to the knowledge of cigar smoke]; Hoppe-Seyler’s Z. Physiol. Chem. 56 (1909) 363–372. Habs, M., R. Preussmann, and D. Schmähl: Dose response study on the carcinogenicity of N-nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) in male Sprague Dawley rats; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 99 (1981) A27. Haeberer, A.F.: The determination of maleic hydrazide in smoke condensate; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27,
1471.
1472.
1473.
1474. 1475.
1476.
1477.
1478.
1479.
1480.
1481.
1481a.
1482.
1483.
1484.
Paper No. 28, 1973, p. 21; Haeberer, A.F. and O.T. Chortyk: Rapid determination of maleic hydrazide in cigarette smoke condensate and particulate matter; J. Agr. Food Chem. 22 (1974) 1135–1137. Haeberer, A.F. and O.T. Chortyk: High pressure liquid chromatography of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon constituents; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 1 (1975) 72–96. Haeberer, A.F. and O.T. Chortyk: Analysis of volatile pyrolytic products of tobacco constituents: Stearic acid pyrolysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 141–144. Haeberer, A.F., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and O.T. Chortyk: A new quantitative method for maleic hydrazide; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 30, 1972, p. 46; A rapid quantitative method for maleic hydrazide; J. Agr. Food Chem. 22 (1974) 328–330. VOID Haeberer, A.F., M.E. Snook, and O.T. Chortyk: Reversephase high-pressure liquid chromatography of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 41, 1974, p. 28; Liquid chromatography of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chim. Acta 80 (1975) 303–309. Haebisch, H.: Die Zigarette als Kohlenmonoxydquelle [The cigarette as a carbon monoxide source]; Arch. Toxikol. 26 (1970) 251–261. Haefele, L.R.: An apparatus for the collection of mainstream and sidestream smokes: The analysis of the smoke from cigarettes made with a special porous paper; RDR, 1959, No. 5, April 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933126 -3156. Haefele, L.R.: Analysis of the mainstream and sidestream smokes of cigarettes made with a porous paper. II; RDR, 1959, No. 72, June 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500611520 -1530. Haefele, L.R.: The fate of disodium isopropylmalonate3–14C; RDR, 1964, No. 23, April 30, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500963621 -3639. Haefele, L.R. and J.A. Giles: Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. I. The fate of n-hentriacontane16–14C; RDR, 1960, No. 37, December 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500935041 -5071. Haefele, L.R., S.S. Mims, and P.H. Latimer: The pyrolysis of mixtures of hexane and ethanol-1–14C; RDR, 1961, No. 50, November 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500937520 -7566. Hagel, J.M. and P.J. Facchini: Elevated tyrosine decarboxylase and tyramine hydroxycinnamoyltransferase levels increase wound-induced tyramine-derived hydroxycinnamic acid amide accumulation in transgenic tobacco leaves; Planta 221 (2005) 904–914. Haggard, H.W. and L.A. Greenberg: Concentration of menthol in the smoke from mentholated cigarettes. A study of local and systemic effects; Arch. Otolaryngol. 33 (1941) 711–716. Hahn, M. and O. Ehrismann: Untersuchungen über Nikotin un die Entnikotinisierung des Tabakrauches. I [Studies on nicotine and the denicotinization of tobacco smoke. I]; Z. Hyg. Infektionskrankheit 112 (1931) 680–697. Hahn, M. and H. Langer: Tabakrauch und Nikotin sowie eine biologische Methode für die quantitative Bestimmung des Nikotins [Tobacco smoke and nicotine and a biological method for the quantitative determination of nicotine]; Z. Hyg. Infektionskrankheit 90 (1920) 22–36.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1319
11/24/08 2:39:41 PM
1320
1485. Hajaligol, M.R. and T.S. Fisher: Decomposition kinetics of phenolic compounds in tobacco; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST10, p. 154. 1486. Hajaligol, M.R., M.A. Wojtowicz, R.M. Carangelo, R. Bassikalis, Y. Chen, and M.A. Serio: Quantitative characterization of tobacco pyrolysis products using TG/ FTIR; CORESTA, Mtg. Smoke-Technology Groups, Innsbruck, Austria (1999): Paper ST19. 1487. Hale, R.W.: Determination of acrolein, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde in whole smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 40, 1969, p. 22. 1488. Hale, R.W., R.M. Ikeda, and F.L. Daylor Jr: Transfer of added and naturally occurring hydrocarbons to mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 34, 1977, p. 26. 1489. Haley, D.E., C.O. Jensen, and O. Olson: A study of the ammonia content of cigar smoke; Plant Physiol. 6 (1931) 183–187. 1490. Haley, N.J., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Uptake of tobacco smoke components; in: Mechanisms in tobacco carcinogenesis, Banbury Report 23, edited by D. Hoffmann and C.C. Harris, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1986) 3–20. 1491. Halter, H.H., T. Fazio, and S. Rosenberg: The presence of some dicarbonyls in tobacco smoke; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 12, 1958, p. 5. 1492. Halter, H.M. and T.I. Ito: Effect of tobacco reconstitution and expansion processes on smoke composition; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 4 (1978) 113–137. 1492a. Hamada, T., H. Kodama, K. Takeshita, H. Utsumi, and K, Iba: Characterization of transgenic tobacco with an increased A-linolenic acid level; Plant Physiol. 118 (1998) 591–598. 1493. Hamilton, J.L. and R.H. Lowe: Changes in the concentration of proteins, amino acids and ammonia in burley tobacco during air curing; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 89–93. 1493a. Hampl, V. and A. Gu: The effect of papermaking pigments on carbon monoxide deliveries of cigarettes; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 85, 2005, pp. 65–66. 1494. Handy, B.M., P.G. Baker, and W.R. Harvey: Rapid automated procedure for determination of phenols on steam distillates of particulate matter of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 41. 1494a. Hanmer, H.R.: Variations in the chemical composition of the tobacco crop; 1st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 1, Paper No. 12, 1947. 1495. Hanmer, H.R.: Filter “balances” smoke. New filter has activated carbon: Picks up vapor phase components; Statement attributed to Dr. H.R. Hanmer, Director of Research, American Tobacco Co., Chem. Eng. News 36(33) (1958) 38. 1495a. Hann, R.M., O.R. Pagán, L. Gregory, T. Jácome, A.D. Rodríguez, P. A. Ferchmin, R. Lu, and V.A. Eterović: Characterization of cembranoid interaction with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 287 (1998) 253–260. 1495b. Hanst, P.L., J.W. Spence, and F.R. Clay: Chlorofluoromethanes: Their thermal stability in passing
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1496.
1497.
1498.
1499.
1500.
1501.
1501a.
1502.
1503.
1504.
1505.
1506.
through cigarettes; Environ. Sci. Res. Lab. Program, Research Triangle Park, NC, February, 1977, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500265898 -5898; Am. Indust. Hyg. Assoc. J. 39 (1978) 772–776. Harbin, B.A. and M. Goodale: Puff-by-puff analysis of acetaldehyde, acrolein, and acetone in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1969, No. 9, January 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500604535 -4542. Harbin, B.A. and A.H. Laurene: Pipe smoke analysis: Acrolein, acetaldehyde, acetone, hydrogen cyanide, oxides of nitrogen, nicotine, and total solids; RDR, 1966, No. 6, March 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966794 -6828. Harbin, B.A., L.A. Lyerly, and G.W. Young: Determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1964, No. 22, April 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514901729 -1737. Harbin, B.A. and T.W. Stamey: Automated data acquisition and processing of the FTC “tar” analyses; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 18, 1975, p. 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510971828 -1828. Hardy, D.R. and M.E. Hobbs: The use of N15 and of N15 and O16 in added nitrates for the study of some generated constituents of normal cigarette smoke; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 489–510. Hardy, D.R. and M.E. Hobbs: Isotope dilution study of added tobacco matrix nitrate and smoke components of cigarettes; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 15, 1977, p. 8. Hargraves, W.A. and M.W. Pariza: Purification and mass spectral characterization of bacterial mutagens from commercial beef extract; Cancer Res. 43 (1983) 1467–1472. Harke, H.P.: Beitrag zur Analytik von Rauchkondensat und Kondensatfraktionen [Contribution to the analysis of smoke condensate and condensate fractions]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1967) 65–68. Harke, H.P.: Zum Problem des Passivrauchens. I. Über den Einfluss des Rauchens auf die CO-Konzentration in Büroraumen [The problem of passive smoking: On the influence of smoking on the CO concentration in offices]; Internat. Arch. Arbeitsmed. 33 (1974) 199–206. Harke, H.P. and C.J. Drews: Eine einfache Methode zur Gewinnung gasförmiger Tabakrauchbestandteile. Ihre Anwendung zur Bestimmung des Kohlenmonoxids im Rauch [A simple way of recovering gaseous tobacco smoke components: Its application to the determination of carbon monoxide in smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 275–277. Harke, H. P., C.J. Drews, and D. Schüller: Über das Vorkommen von Norbornenderivaten in Tabakrauchkondensaten [On the occurrence of norbornene derivatives in tobacco smoke condensate]; Tetrahedron Lett. 3 (1970) 3789–3790. Harke, H. P. and H. Peters: Zum Problem des Passivrauchens. III. Über den Einfluss des Rauchens auf die CO-Konzentration im Kraftfahrzeug bei Fahrten im Stadtgebiet [On the problem of passive smoking. III. The influence of smoking on the CO concentration in motor
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1320
11/24/08 2:39:42 PM
Bibliography
1507.
1508.
1509.
1510.
1511.
1512.
1513.
1514.
1515.
1516.
1517.
1518.
1519.
1520.
1521.
1522.
1523.
1524.
vehicles during driving in state territory]; Internat. Arch. Arbeitsmed. 33 (1974) 221–229. Harke, H. P., D. Schüller, and C.J. Drews: Pyrolyse von Maleinsäurehydrazid und Hydrazin [Pyrolysis of maleic hydrazide and hydrazine]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 153 (1973) 163–169. Harke, H.P., D. Schüller, J. Klimisch, and K. Meissner, Investigation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 162 (1976) 291–297. Harley, N.H., B.S. Cohen, and T.C. Tso: Polonium-210. A questionable risk factor in smoking-related carcinogenesis; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) pp. 93–104. Harllee, G.C. and J.L. Harris: Study of the water band characteristic in cigarettes containing various levels of G13; RDM, 1975, No. 10, February 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615978 -5987. Harllee, G.C. and J.C. Leffingwell: Composition of casing materials: Cocoa, its constituents and their organoleptic properties; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 25, 1979, p. 13. Harllee, G.C. and J.C. Leffingwell: Casing materialsCocoa (Part I); Tob. Internat. 181 (5) (1979) 40, 45, 46, 49, 51, 52. Harllee, G.C. and J.C. Leffingwell: Casing materialsCocoa (Part II); Tob. Internat. 181(6) (1979) 18, 19, 21, 22, 25–28, 31, 34, 36, 39, 42, 43. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of nitrates in tobacco and tobacco stems; RDR, 1957, No. 5, March 15, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500931214 -1243. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of nickel in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1960, No. 100, December 19, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500600539 -0544. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of the acid value of cigarette smoke; RDM, 1961, No. 31, April 12, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500600680 -0683. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of total solids in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1963, No. 13, February 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500611317 -1321. Harrell, T.G.: A study of procedures for the determination of solids or “tar” in the smoke of Carlton cigarettes; RDM, 1964, No. 12, January 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503651911 -1915. Harrell, T.G.: Examination of specially denicotinized Camel cigarettes; RDM, 1964, No. 68, July 8, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500602365 -2368. Harrell, T.G.: Chemical evaluation of the smoking quality of flue-cured tobacco; RDM, 1964, No. 80, August 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602417 -2421. Harrell, T.G.: Analysis of processed stems (G-7) from competitive brands; RDM, 1964, No. 107, December 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602530 -2533. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of ammonia in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1965, No. 25, March 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602631 -2635. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of nicotine and wet and dry solids in the smoke of pipe tobaccos; RDM, 1965, No. 76, October 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603383 -3390. Harrell, T.G.: Improved method for determination of ammonia in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1971, No. 44, July 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511815981 -5986.
1321
1525. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of nitrate content of tobacco with a selective ion electrode; RDM, 1971, No. 55, November 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500605819 -5824. 1526. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of hydrogen sulfide content of cigarette smoke; RDM, 1972, No. 3, January 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615328 -5334. 1527. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of the ammonia of tobacco with an ammonia electrode; RDM, 1973, No. 18, June 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606154 -6162. 1528. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of the nitrogen oxides content of cigarette smoke; RDM, 1976, No. 3, January 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616592 -6598. 1529. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of the total content of carbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1976, No. 18, April 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616770 -6774. 1530. Harrell, T.G.: Determination of the total phenols content of cigarette smoke; RDM, 1977, No. 12, April 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617138 -7144. 1531. Harrell, T.G. and K.L. Rush: A review of the determination of ammonia in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1975, No. 2, January 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615926 -5933. 1532. Harrell, T.G., K.L. Rush, and A.J. Sensabaugh Jr: Colorimetric method for the determination of ammonia in tobacco smoke; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 15, 1975, p. 16; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 145–147. 1533. VOID 1534. Harrell, T.G. and B.N. Sullivan Jr: Arsenic content of tobacco; RDM, 1956, No. 22, August 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610461 -0463. 1535. Harrell, T.G. and B.N. Sullivan Jr: Arsenic content of tobacco; RDM, 1956, No. 28, October 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610476 -0476. 1536. Harrell, T.G. and B.N. Sullivan Jr: Study of methods for the determination of nicotine and particulate matter in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1963, No. 49, June 27, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500612668 -2679. 1537. Harris, J.L.: A treatise on theories of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation; RDM, 1967, No. 38, July 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504913304 -3311. 1538. Harris, J.L.: Control of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke. A survey; RDM, 1967, No. 46, August 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613447 -3454. 1539. Harris, J.L.: Determination of ammonia in mainstream smoke per puff by collection in a stirred liquid trap; RDM, 1974, No. 26, December 26, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500606712 -6716. 1540. Harrow, L.S., J.T. Butler, F.E. Resnik, A.C. Estes, M.E. Bill, and R.B. Seligman: Spectrophotometric determination of total carbonyl content utilizing integrated absorbance measurements; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 13, 1956, p. 10. 1541. Hartridge, H.: Carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke; J. Physiol., Proc. Physiol. Soc. Mtg. 53 (1920) 82–83. 1542. Hartung, H.A. and L.L. Steward: Puff-by-puff delivery equations for tar, nicotine and water; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 20, 1973, p. 13. 1543. Hartwell, J.L.: Survey of compounds which have been tested for carcinogenic activity; USPHS Publ. No. 149, Washington, DC (1947).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1321
11/24/08 2:39:42 PM
1322
1544. Hartwell, J.L.: Survey of compounds which have been tested for carcinogenic activity; USPHS Publ. No. 149, 2nd Edition, Washington, DC (1951). 1545. Harvey, W.R.: Manual determination of nitrate and sulfate in tobacco and tobacco products; Tob. Sci. 23 (1979) 25–28. 1546. Harvey, W.R., C.E. Badgett, and F.E. Resnik: The determination of nicotine alkaloids in tobacco leaf, cigarette filler, and TPM by acid-methanol extraction; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 15, 1966, pp. 17–19; Nicotine alkaloids in tobacco leaf, cigarette filler, and particulate matter of smoke by acid-methanol extraction; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 84–86. 1547. Harvey, W.R., P.G. Baker, and W.B. Fountaine: Colorimetric determination of sorbic acid in reconstituted tobacco; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 133–135. 1548. Harvey, W.R., R.W. Hale, and R.M. Ikeda: The determination of organic acids in plants and food products; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 141–144. 1549. Harvey, W.R. and A.M. Palmer: Field test estimation of reducing sugars and nicotine alkaloids in tobacco leaf; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 4 (1970, p. 4; Harvey, W.R., H.M. Stahr, and W.C. Smith: Automated determination of reducing sugars and nicotine alkaloids on the same extract of tobacco leaf; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 13–15. 1550. Hasebe, H. and S. Suhara: The quality estimation of different tobacco types examined by headspace vapor analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (1999) 213–222. 1551. Hattemeyer-Frey, H.A. and C.C. Travis: Benzo-apyrene environmental partitioning and human exposure; Toxicol. Ind. Hlth. 7 (1991) 141–157. 1552. Haut, S.A.: The effect of ionic nitrate addition on mainstream TSNA delivery; Memorandum, November 19, 1990, see www.pmdocs.com 2024048764 /8771; Mainstream NO, TSNA, and filler nitrate; Memorandum, March 18, 1991, see www.pmdocs.com 2029088923 /8927. 1553. Hawk, R.E., T.J. Sheets, C.C. Cassil, O.H. Fullmer, G.H. Fujie, and J.F. McCarthy: Effect of application method on the transfer of carbofuran and 3-hydroxycarbofuran residues into cigarette mainstream smoke; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 3–5. 1554. Haworth, R.D. and C.R. Mavin: A new route to chrysene and 1:2-benzanthracene; J. Chem. Soc. (1933) 1012–1016. 1555. Hayakawa, K. and H. Shikata: A simple and sensitive method for the whole-smoke analysis of sidestream tobacco smoke by TDS-GC/MS; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 85, 2001, pp. 69–70. 1555a. Hayatsu, H., K. Inoue, H. Ohta, T. Namba, K. Togawa, T. Hayatsu, M. Makita, and Y. Wataya: Inhibition of the mutagenicity of cooked-beef basic fraction by its acidic fraction; Mutation Res. 91 (1981) 437–442. 1555b. Hayatsu, H., Y. Matsui, Y. Ohara, T. Oka, and T. Hayatsu: Characterization of mutagenic fractions in beef extract and in cooked ground beef. Use of blue cotton for efficient extraction; Gann 74 (1983) 472–482. 1555c. Hayes, J.R. and W.Y. Rice Jr: Lack of effect of smoke condensate collection method on paramagnetic radical species in the particulate phase of cigarettes that
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1556.
1556a.
1557. 1558.
1559.
1560.
1561.
1562.
1562a.
1563.
1564.
1565.
burn tobacco and cigarettes that heat tobacco; R&DM, 1989, No. 308, November 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508296780 -6794. Haynes, C.M. and S.W. Pleasants: A rapid spectrophotometric determination of total alkaloids in tobacco smoke; Virginia J. Sci. 9 (1958) 400. Health Canada, Tobacco Control Programme: Determination of ammonia in mainstream tobacco smoke; Booklet T-101 (December 31, 1999) pp. 1–9, see www. hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/method/mainprincipal/ammonia/ammonia_e.pdf. Hecht, S.S.: Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91 (1999) 1194–1210. Hecht, S.S., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Tobaccospecific nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6. N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, T. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 93–101. Hecht, S.S., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: HPLC-TEA of tobacco-specific nitrosamines; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6. N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, T. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 429–436. Hecht, S.S., W.E. Bondinell, and D. Hoffmann: Isolation and identification of alkylchrysenes in cigarette smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 32, 1973, p. 23; Chrysene and methylchrysenes: Presence in tobacco smoke and carcinogenicity; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 53 (1974) 1121–1133. Hecht, S.S., S. Carmella, and D. Hoffmann: Hydroxyphenyl alcohols in tobacco and tobacco smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 51, 1977, p. 26; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LIV. Determination of hydroxybenzyl alcohols and hydroxyphenylethanols in tobacco and tobacco smoke; J. Anal. Toxicol. 2 (1978) 56–59. Hecht, S.S., S. Carmella, H. Mori, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XX. Role of catechol as a major cocarcinogen in the weakly acidic fraction of smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66 (1981) 163–169. Hecht, S.S., S.G. Carmella, S.E. Murphy, S. Akerkar, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: A tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in the urine of men exposed to cigarette smoke; New Eng. J. Med. 329 (1993) 1543–1546. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, M. Dong, R.M. Ornaf, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: Studies on non-volatile nitrosamines in tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 1–6. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, N. Hirota, R.M. Ornaf, T.C. Tso, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XVI. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines: Formation from nicotine in vitro and during curing of tobacco and carcinogenicity in Strain-A mice; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60 (1978) 819–824. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, and D. Hoffmann: Synthesis of N-nitrosamine aldehydes; Tetrahedron Lett. 8 (1976) 593–596.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1322
11/24/08 2:39:42 PM
Bibliography
1566. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogensis. LVIII. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines: Occurrence, formation, carcinogenicity, and metabolism; Acc. Chem. Res. (1979) 92–98. 1567. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Formation and metabolism of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in leaf; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, 1978, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S16, 122. 1567a. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, G.D. McCoy and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines: Occurrence, carcinogenicity, and metabolism; in: N-Nitrosamines, Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Series 101 (1979) 125–152. 1568. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, R.M. Ornaf, D. Hoffmann: and T.C. Tso: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LVI. Tobacco-specific nitrosamines: Origins, carcinogenicity, and metabolism; in: Environmental aspects of N-nitroso compounds, edited by E.A. Walker, M. Castegnaro, L. Griciute, and R.E. Lyle, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 19 (1978) 395–413. 1569. Hecht, S.S., C.B. Chen, R. Young, and D. Hoffmann: Mass spectra of tobacco alkaloid-derived nitrosamines, their metabolism, and related compounds; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 57–66. 1570. Hecht, S.S., P. Foiles, S. Carmella, N. Trushin, A. Rivenson, and D. Hoffmann: Recent studies on the metabolic activation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines: Prospects for dosimetry in humans; in: Mechanisms in tobacco carcinogenesis. Banbury Report 23, edited by D. Hoffmann and C.C. Harris, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1986) 245–257. 1571. Hecht, S.S. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines, an important group of carcinogens in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Carcinogenesis 9 (1988) 875–884. 1571a. Hecht, S.S. and D. Hoffmann: 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, a nicotine-derived tobacco-specific nitrosamine, and cancer of the lung and pancreas in humans; in: Origins of human cancer: A comprehensive review, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1991) pp. 745–755. 1572. Hecht, S.S., P.M. Kenney, M. Wang, N. Trushin, S. Agarwal, A.V. Rao, and P. Upadhyaya: Evaluation of butylated hydroxyanisole, meso-inositol, cucumin, esculetin, resveratrol and lycopene as inhibitors of benzo[a] pyrene plus 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1–3-pyridyl)-1-butanone-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice; Cancer Lett. 137(2) (1999) 123–130. 1573. Hecht, S.S., M. Loy, R. Maronpot, and D. Hoffmann: A study of chemical carcinogenesis: Comparative carcinogenicity of 5-methylchrysene, benzo[a]pyrene, and modified chrysenes; Cancer Lett. 1 (1976) 147–154. 1573a. Hecht, S.S., S.E. Murphy, and D. Hoffmann: Tobaccospecific lung carcinogen and exposure to passive smoking; New Eng. J. Med. 330 (1994) 1016–1017. 1574. Hecht, S.S., R.M. Ornaf, C.B. Chen, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: On the origin of N’-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 34, 1975, p. 25. 1575. Hecht, S.S., R.M. Ornaf, M. Dong, and D. Hoffmann: Studies on nonvolatile nitrosamines in tobacco; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 27, 1976, p. 22.
1323
1576. Hecht, S.S., R.M. Ornaf, and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosoalkaloids in tobacco; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 36, 1974, p. 25. 1577. Hecht, S.S., R.M. Ornaf, and D. Hoffmann: Determination of N’-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco by high-speed liquid chromatography; Anal. Chem. 47 (1975) 2046–2048. 1578. Hecht, S.S., R.M. Ornaf, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXXIII. N’-Nitrosonornicotine in tobacco: Analysis of possible contributing factors and biological implications; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 54 (1974) 1237–1244. 1579. Hecht, S.S., R. Raineri, R. Maronpot, D. Hoffmann: and E.L. Wynder: N’-Nitrosonornicotine: Presence and origin in tobacco and carcinogenicity in rats; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 16 (1975) 152. 1580. Hecht, S.S., I. Schmeltz, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LVIII. Nitrogenous compounds in cigarette smoke and their possible precursors; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 3 (1977) 59–93. 1581. Hecht, S.S., I. Schmeltz, D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XL. Identification of carcinogens in tobacco; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 191–202. 1582. Hecht, S.S., R.L. Thorne, and D. Hoffmann: Studies on tumor promoters in tobacco smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 42, 1974, p. 28, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501527005 -7015. 1583. Hecht, S.S., R.L. Thorne, R. Maronpot, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XIII. Tumor promoting subfractions of the weakly acidic fraction; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 55 (1975) 1329–1336. 1584. Hecht, S.S. and A.R. Tricker: Nitrosamines derived from nicotine and other tobacco alkaloids; Chapter 11 in: Analytical determination of nicotine and related compounds and their metabolites, edited by J.W. Gorrod and P. Jacob III, Elsevier, New York, NY (1999) 421–488. 1585. Hecht, S.S., T.C. Tso, and D. Hoffmann: Approaches to the reduction of nitrosamines and aromatic amines; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, 1975, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76–1221 (1976) 535–545. 1586. Heckman, R.A.: Smoke composition of burley stems versus burley tobacco; RDR, 1974, No. 3, March 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510646885 -6921. 1587. Heckman, R.A. and F.W. Best: An investigation of the lipophilic bases of cigarette smoke condensate; RDR, 1978, No. 3, March 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501005358 -5395; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 47, 1978, p. 25; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 33–39. 1587a. Heckman, R.L., M.F. Dube, D. Lynm, and J.M. Rivers: The role of tobacco leaf precursors in cigarette flavor; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 7 (1981) 107–153. 1588. Heckman, R.A. and H.L. Gilleland: Quantitative analysis of methoprene residues on tobacco; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 30, 1984, p. 16, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507160736 -0742.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1323
11/24/08 2:39:43 PM
1324
1589. Heckman, R.A., M.P. Newell, C.R. Green, C.W. Miller, and F.W. Best: Smoke composition: E-2 Cigarettes L-8527A and L-8527B (Dawn); RDM, 1975, No. 24, May 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616296 -6316. 1590. Heckman, R.A., A.B. Norman, J.M. Rivers, M.P. Newell, S.C. Dillender, and N.C. Sanders: Reaction products of sugars with aqueous ammonia: A literature survey; RDM, 1979, No. 22, May 22, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500608568 -8586. 1590a. Heckman, R.A. and F.W. Wendelboe: The effect of G13 processing on tobacco flavor composition; RDM, 1980, No. 5, February 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617511 -7533. 1591. Heemann, V., U. Brümmer, G. Spremberg, and F. Seehofer: Einfluss von Genotyp und Umwelt auf die Diterpene in der Wachsschicht einiger “flue-cured” tabake [Influence of genotype and environment on the diterpenes in the wax layer of some flue-cured tobaccos]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 107–113. 1592. Hege, R.B. Jr: Quantitative determination of benzo[a] pyrene in tobacco smoke for twenty-eight competitive brands; RDM, 1970, No. 8, February 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614210 -4213; 514901336 -1339. 1593. Hege, R.B. Jr: Determination of benzo[a]pyrene in smoke condensate by ultraviolet spectroscopy; RDM, 1971, No. 58, December 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500605845 -5851. 1594. Hege, R.B. Jr: Modification of routine thin-layer method for determining benzo[a]pyrene in smoke; RDM, 1972, No. 13, March 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615425 -5432. 1595. Hege, R.B. Jr: Gas chromatographic determination of methylene chloride in tobacco; RDM, 1975, No. 27, June 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616331 -6333. 1596. Hege, R.B. Jr: Gas chromatographic determination of hexane in tobacco; RDM, 1975, No. 31, August 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616355 -6357. 1597. Hege, R.B. Jr: Gas chromatographic determination of pentane in tobacco; RDM, 1976, No. 11, March 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616673 -6675. 1598. Hege, R.B. Jr: Determination of neophytadiene in tobacco and tobacco smoke; RDM, 1976, No. 12, March 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616676 -6681; Determination of neophytadiene in cigarette smoke and tobacco; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 42, 1976, p. 30; Modification of the methods for the determination of neophytadiene in tobacco and tobacco smoke; RDM, 1977, No. 13, April 25, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500617145 -7149. 1599. Hege, R.B. Jr: Determination of coumarin in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1976, No. 14, March 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616694 -6699. 1600. Hege, R.B. Jr: Determination of carbon dioxide in cigarette smoke by non-dispersive infrared; RDM, 1977, No. 11, April 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617129 -7137. 1601. Hege, R.B. Jr: Gas chromatographic determination of isopropyl alcohol in tobacco; RDM, 1978, No. 16, June 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500259224 -9247. 1602. Hege, R.B. Jr: The measurement of oxides of nitrogen in diluted cigarette smoke; RDM, 1978, No. 17, June 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607703 -7716. 1603. Hege, R.B. Jr: Gas chromatographic determination of humectants in smoke; RDM, 1979, No. 41, November
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1604.
1605.
1606.
1607.
1608.
1609.
1610.
1611.
1612.
1613.
1614.
1615a.
1615b.
1615.
1616.
1617.
1618.
1619.
7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512354798 -4805; 510547333 -7338; 521689684 -9691. Hege, R.B. Jr: Spectrophotometric determination of smoke “tar” in ultralow cigarettes; RDM, 1980, No. 31, September 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512074705 -4715. Hege, R.B. Jr and L.A. Lyerly: Determination of carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke by non-dispersive infrared; RDM, 1977, No. 1, January 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617021 -7032. Heiduschska, A.: Erfahrung bei der Nikotinbestimmung im Tabak und im Rauch [Knowledge of the estimation of nicotine in tobacco and in smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 71 (1930) 305–306. Heiduschska, A.: Über die Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch [Determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 77 (1936) 780–782. Heiduschska, A. and F. Muth: Über Nikotin im Tabak [Nicotine in tobacco]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 68 (1927) 337–345. Heiduschska, A. and F. Muth: Über Nikotin im Tabak [Nicotine in tobacco]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 68 (1927) 353–361. Heiduschska, A. and F. Muth: Über Nikotin im Tabak [Nicotine in tobacco]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 68 (1927) 369–374. Heiduschska, A. and F. Muth: Über Nikotin im Tabak. II [Nicotine in tobacco. II]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 69 (1929) 305–307, 454. Heiduschska, A. and F. Muth: Über Nikotin im Tabak. III [Nicotine in tobacco. III]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 70 (1929) 517–520. Heiduschska, A. and F. Muth: Über Nikotin im Tabak. IV [Nicotine in tobacco. IV]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 70 (1929) 677–680. Heiduschska, A. and E. Post: Über die Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch [Determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 73 (1932) 529–530. Heim, W.G. and J.G. Jelesko: Association of diamine oxidase and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in Nicotiana tabacum extracts; Plant. Mol. Biol. 56 (2004) 299–308. Heitz, T., P. Geoffroy, A. Stintzi, B. Fritig, and M. Legrandf: cDNA cloning and gene expression analysis of the microbial proteinase inhibitor of tobacco; J. Biol. Chem. 268 (1993) 16987–16992. Heinzer, F., H.-P. Maïtre, M. Rigaux, and J. Wild: Pattern recognition of tobacco headspace GC profiles: A potential new analytical tool for classification of raw tobaccos; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1988) 93–103. Hellier, D.N. and W.W. Reid: The lipids of tobacco and tobacco smoke; 13th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 13, Paper No. 20, 1959, p. 11. Helwig, F.C.: Growth-producing effects of extracts of tobacco on mice; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 91 (1928) 150–151. Hengy, H. and J. Thirion: The determination of Malathion residues in tobacco and tobacco smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 175–178. Hengy, H. and J. Thirion: The determination of Thiodan and Thiodan sulfate on tobacco and in smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 57–61.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1324
11/24/08 2:39:43 PM
Bibliography
1620. Henley, W.M. and C.D. Mays: Turkish tobacco. Second progress report on the isolation and identification of some of its constituents; RDR, 1955, No. 9, August 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501663268 -3315. 1621. Henry, C.J. and R.E. Kouri: Chronic exposure of mice to cigarette smoke. Final report on “Smoke Inhalation in Mice”; Field, Rich and Associates, New York, NY (1984). 1622. Henry, C.J. and R.E. Kouri: Chronic inhalation studies in mice. II. Effects of long-term exposure to 2R1 cigarette smoke on (C57BL/Cum x C3HAnf/Cum) mice; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 77 (1986) 203–212. 1623. Hensley, J.L. and B.L. Phillips: Automated analysis of vapor phase components in cigarette smoke using GC/ MS; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 41, 1992, p. 47. 1623a. Herndon, W.C.: Theory of carcinogenic activity of aromatic hydrocarbons; Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. Ser. II 36 (1974) 200–217; Herndon, W.C. and A.J. Bruce; Perimeter codes for benzenoid aromatic hydrocarbons; in: Studies in physical and theoretical chemistry, edited by R.B. King and D.H. Rouvray, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam 51 (1987) 491–513; Linear notation for benzenoid aromatic hydrocarbons. Molecular similarity based on notation similarity; J. Math. Chem. 2 (1988) 155–169; Herndon, W.C., P.C. Nowak, D.A. Connor, and P. Lin; Empirical model calculations for thermodynamic and structural properties of condensed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 41–47; Herndon, W.C. and L.V. Szentpaly: Theoretical model of activation of carcinogenic polycyclic benzenoid aromatic hydrocarbons. Possible new classes of carcinogenic aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Molecul. Structure (Theochem) 148 (1986) 141–152; Structure-property relationships in polycyclic aromatics; Symposium on Chem. Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Am. Chem. Soc. (1986) 849–855. 1623b. Herouart, D., M. Van Montagu, and D. Inzo: Redoxactivated expression of the cytosolic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase gene in Nicotiana; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90 (1993) 3108–3112. 1624. Herrmann, K.: Untersuchungen über die Entnikotinisierung mittels der Bonikot Methode [Research on denicotinization by the Bonicot method]; Med. Welt (1931) 1564. 1625. Herrmann, K.: A review of literature on phenols, phenolic acids, and related compounds in green tobacco, cured tobacco, and tobacco smoke; Deut. Apotheker Ztg. 101 (1961) 1481–1482. 1626. Herrmann, K., Über die phenolischen Inhaltstoffe des Tabaks und des Tabakrauches [On the phenol content of tobaccos and tobacco smokes]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 159–179. 1627. Hicks, R.D. and S.P. Dunlap: An alternative method for the determination of menthol in cigarettes and tobacco components; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 15, 1993, p. 27. 1628. Hicks, R.D., K.W. Fowler, M.E. Lovette, M.F. Borgerding, and E.J. Nanni: Separation and quantitation of ionic species in mainstream smoke aerosols from 1R4F Kentucky Reference Cigarettes and new cigarettes that heat but do not burn tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 15, 1988, p. 23.
1325
1629. Hicks-White, G., M. Nguyen, and C. Gottschalk: Investigation of FTIR and NDIR carbon monoxide analyzers for measurements in gas phase of smoke; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 55, 1999, pp. 50–51. 1630. Hieger, I.: Spectra of cancer-producing tars and oils and of related substances; Biochem. J. 24 (1930) 505–511. 1631. Hieger, I.: Isolation of a cancer-producing hydrocarbon from coal tar. I. Concentration of the active substance; J. Chem. Soc. (1933) 385–396. 1632. Higashi, N., M. Chida, S. Tsuyoshi, and S. Suhara: Tobacco vapor-phase measurement methodology and multivariate analysis using vapor-phase and semivolatile components; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 67, 1996, pp. 60–61 1633. Higashi, N., N. Miura, and H. Shikata: An advanced methodology for unsaturated hydrocarbons analysis in tobacco smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 39, 2001, p. 43. 1634. Higashi, N., H. Shikata, M. Shimoda, and I. Hayakawa: Analysis of sidestream smoke VOCs and characterization of their odor profiles by VOC preconcentratorGC-O techniques; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 32–39. 1635. Higgins, C.E., T.M. Gayle, and J.R. Stokely: Sensor for detection of tobacco smoke particulates in inhalation exposure systems; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 185–189. 1636. Higgins, C.E., W.H. Griest, and M.R. Guerin: Methodology for the sampling and analyses of sidestream and mainstream smokes; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 39, 1984, p. 21. 1637. Higgins, C.E., W.H. Griest, and M.R. Guerin: Sampling and analysis of cigarette smoke using the solid adsorbent Tenax®; Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. Rpt. ORNL/TM-9167 (1984). 1638. Higgins, C.E., W.H. Griest, and G. Olerich: Application of Tenax® trapping to the analysis of gas phase organics in cigarette smoke; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 35, 1981, p. 18; Application of Tenax® trapping to the analysis of gas phase organic compounds in ultra-low tar cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. Div., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN (1981); J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 65 (1982) 1074–1073. 1639. Higgins, C.E. and M.R. Guerin: Studies on the source apportionment of indoor air contaminants due to cigarette smoke; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 49, 1988, p. 41. 1640. Higgins, C.E., J.R. Stokely, and M.R. Guerin: Organic gas phase composition of contained smoke aerosols used for inhalation testing; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 49, 1975, p. 33. 1641. Higgins, C.E., J.R. Stokely, M.R. Guerin, and T.L. Roberts: Application of methodology to organic gas phase constituents in tobacco smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 55, 1975, p. 35.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1325
11/24/08 2:39:43 PM
1326
1642. Higgins, C.E., C.V. Thompson, R.H. Ilgner, R.A. Jenkins, and M.R. Guerin: Multicomponent environmental tobacco smoke analysis using triple sorbent traps and thermal desorption gas chromatography; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 24, 1987, p. 25. 1643. Higgins, C.E., C.V. Thompson, R.H. Ilgner, R.A. Jenkins, and M.R. Guerin: Determination of vapor phase hydrocarbons and nitrogen constituents in environmental tobacco smoke; Report 6120, Anal. Chem. Div., ORNL, Oak Ridge, TN (1991). 1644. Higman, E.B., H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Pyrolytic products of aliphatic alcohols; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 29, 1974, p. 22. 1645. Higman, E.B., H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Pyrolytic products of a tobacco sucker control agent and its component aliphatic alcohols; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 93–95. 1646. Higman, E.B., I. Schmeltz, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Studies on the thermal degradation of naturally occurring materials. II. Products from the pyrolysis of triglycerides at 400°C; J. Agr. Food Chem. 21 (1973) 202–204. 1647. Higman, E.B., I. Schmeltz, and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Products from the thermal degradation of some naturally occurring materials; J. Agr. Food Chem. 18 (1970) 636–639. 1648. Higman, E.B., R.F. Severson, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Simulation of smoking conditions by pyrolysis; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 41, 1976, p. 29; J. Agr. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 1201–1207. 1649. Higman, H.C., E.B. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Pyrolysis of selected cigarette flavoring additives; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 41, 1973, p. 28; Pyrolysis of selected tobacco flavoring additives; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 136–138. 1650. Higman, H.C., M.E. Snook, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: The identification of multi-alkylated polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from cigarette smoke condensate; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 45, 1976, p. 31. 1651. Higman, H.C., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, and R.F. Arrendale; Pyrolytic evaluation of close-grown tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1979) 65–72. 1652. Higman, H.C., M.E. Snook, and R.F. Severson: Computer-aided identification of methylated polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in complex mixtures; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 20, 1975, p. 18. 1652a. Hilding, A.C.: On cigarette smoking, bronchial carcinoma, and ciliary action. I. Smoking habits and measurement of smoke intake; New Eng. J. Med. 254 (1956) 774–781; II. Experimental study on the filtering action of cows’ lungs, the deposition of tar in the bronchial tree and removal by ciliary action; New Engl. J. Med. 254 (1956) 1155–1160; III. Accumulation of tar upon artifactually produced deciliated islands in the respiratory epithelium; Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 65 (1956) 116–130; IV. Ciliary streaming on the lower respiratory
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1653.
1654.
1654a.
1654b.
1655. 1656.
1656a.
1656b.
1657.
1658.
1659.
1660.
1660a.
1661.
1662.
1663.
tract; Am. J. Physiol. 191 (1957) 404–410; V. Time element in the exposure to carcinogenic substances and its relation to carcinogenesis; Trans. Am. Acad. Opthalmol. 61 1957) 69–81. Hilfrich, J., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Effects of N’-nitrosonornicotine and N’-nitrosoanabasine in Syrian golden hamsters; Cancer Lett. 2 (1977) 169–176. Hill, W.T., D.W. Stanger, A. Pizzo, B. Riegel, P. Shubik, and W.B. Wartman: Inhibition of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2benzanthracene skin carcinogenesis in mice by polycyclic hydrocarbons; Cancer Res. 11 (1951) 892–897. Hiller, F.C., M.K. Mazumder, J.D. Wilson, P.C. McLeod, and R.C. Bone: Human respiratory tract deposition using multimodal aerosols; J. Aerosol Sci. 13 (1982) 337–343. Hiller, F.C., K.T. McCusker, M.K. Mazumder, J.D. Wilson, and R.C. Bone: Deposition of sidestream cigarette smoke in the human respiratory tract; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 125 (1982) 406–408. Hillsman, O.L.: Factors influencing the composition of cigarette smoke; Virginia Sci. J. 2 (1941) 195. Hirao, K., Y. Shinohara, H. Tsuda, S. Fukushima, M. Takahashi, and N. Ito: Carcinogenic activity of quinoline on rat liver; Cancer Res. 36 (1976) 329–335. Hirose, M., Y. Takesada, H. Tanaka, S. Tamano, K. Kato, and T. Shirai: Carcinogenicity of antioxidants BHA, caffeic acid, 4-methoxyphenol and catechol at low doses, either alone or in combination, and modulation of their effects in a rat medium-term multi-organ carcinogenesis model; Carcinogenesis 19 (1999) 207–212. Hirose, T., M. Sugita, and M. Sugiura: cDNA structure expression and nucleic acid-binding properties of three RNA-binding proteins in tobacco: Occurrence of tissue-specific alternative splicing; Nucleic Acid Res. 21 (1993) 3981–3987. Hirst, E.L.: The role of tobacco smoking in the production of cancer. IV. Report on the spectrographic examination of tobacco tar; J. Hyg. 32 (1932) 300. Hjern, L.: Review of current Swedish research related to tobacco; in: Om Tobak i Sverige - Jubileumskrift 1915– 1965, Swedish Tobacco Monopoly, Stockholm, Sweden (1967) 329–353. Hjern, L.: Physical and chemical analysis of tobacco smoke; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 965–966. Hlubucek, J.R., A.J. Aasen, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 21. Three new volatile tobacco constituents of probable isoprenoid origin; Acta Chem. Scand. B27 (1973) 2232–2234. Hlubucek, J.R., A.J. Aasen, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 22. Structures and synthesis of a nor- and a seco-terpenoid of the drimane series isolated from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B28 (1974) 18–22. Hlubucek, J.R., A.J. Aasen, S.O. Almqvist, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 25. Two new drimane sesquiterpene alcohols from Greek Nicotiana tabacum; Acta Chem. Scand. B28 (1974) 289–294. Hlubucek, J.R., A.J. Aasen, B. Kimland, and C.R. Enzell: New volatile constituents of Greek Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 12 (1973) 2555–2557. Ho, C.H., W.H. Griest, and M.R. Guerin: Application of the blind assay to biological activity and tobacco smoke terpenes; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 2223–2226.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1326
11/24/08 2:39:43 PM
Bibliography
1663a. Hobbs, M.E.: The composition of cigarette smoke; Southwest Chem. Conf., Am. Chem. Soc., Memphis, TN (1956). 1664. Hobbs, M.E.: A study of some possible chemical equilibria in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 74–77. 1665. Hobbs, M.E.: Some physico-chemical aspects of cigarette smoke generation; CORESTA/TCRC Joint Conf., Williamsburg, VA, CORESTA Invited Papers (1972) 53–75. 1666. Hobbs, M.E. and R.E. Berkley: Application of chemical thermodynamics and kinetic principles to tobacco pyrolysis; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 26, 1974, p. 20. 1667. Hobbs, M.E. and B.R. Warner: Chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke: Size and size distribution of particles in tobacco smoke; 6th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 6, Paper No. 11, 1952. 1668. Hobbs, M.E. and P. Wilder: The composition of cigarette smoke; Southwide Chem. Conf., Am. Chem. Soc., Memphis, TN (1956). 1669. Hodge, B.T.: Analysis of formaldehyde in tobacco smoke by high pressure liquid chromatography; RDM, 1973, No. 29, November 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606283 -6287. 1670 Hodge, B.T. and C.T. Mansfield: Analysis of formaldehyde in tobacco smoke by high pressure liquid chromatography. Part II; RDM, 1975, No. 3, March 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615934 -5943. 1671. Hodge, B.T. and G.R. Shelar: Analysis of glycyrrhizic acid in licorice and tobacco products; RDM, 1979, No. 39, October 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511841660 -1670. 1671a. Hodge, J.E.: Origin of flavor in foods, in: Symposium on foods: The chemistry and. physiology of flavors, edited by H.W. Schultz, E.A. Day, and L.M. Libbey, AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, CN (1967) 465–491. 1671b. Hodge, J.E. and C.E. Rist: The Amadori rearrangement under new conditions and its significance for nonenzymatic browning reactions; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75 (1953) 316–322. 1672. Hoffman, C.A. and J.S. Kauffmann: Evaluation of test methods for the extraction and analysis of TSNAs in tobacco; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 14, 1999, p. 26. 1672a. Hoffman, H.E. and A.C. Griffin: Action of cigarette tar and smoke on chemically induced carcinogenesis; Texas Rep. Biol. Med. 16 (1958) 333–345. 1673. Hoffmann, D.: Testimony before the Technical Study Group on Cigarette and Little Cigar Safety; Washington, DC (February 28, 1985). 1674. Hoffmann, D.: The physicochemical nature of sidestream smoke and environmental tobacco smoke; Manuscript (post-October 1985). 1675. Hoffmann, D.: Snuff found to contain high concentrations of carcinogens; Oncol. Times (1986) 544. 1676. Hoffmann, D.: Nicotine, a tobacco-specific precursor for carcinogens; in: Nicotine, smoking, and the low-tar programme, edited by N. Wald and P. Froggatt. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1989) 24–40.
1327
1677. Hoffmann, D. and J.D. Adams: Carcinogenic tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines in snuff and in the saliva of snuff dippers; Cancer Res. 41 (1981) 4305–4308. 1678. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, and K.D. Brunnemann: A critical look at N-nitrosamines in environmental tobacco smoke; Toxicol. Lett. 35 (1987) 1–8. 1679. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, K.D. Brunnemann, and S.S. Hecht: Assessment of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco products; Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 2505–2509. 1680. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, K.D. Brunnemann, and S.S. Hecht: Formation, occurrence and carcinogenicity of N-nitrosamines in tobacco products; in: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by R.A. Scanlan and S.R. Tannenbaum, Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Series 174 (1981) 247–273. 1681. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, K.D. Brunnemann, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines: Occurrence and bioassays; in: N-Nitroso compounds - Occurrence and biological effects, edited by H. Bartsch, I.K. O’Neill, M. Castegnaro, and M. Okada, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982) 309–318. 1682. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, and N.J. Hawley: Reported cigarette values: A closer look; Am. J. Pub. Hlth. 73 (1983) 1050–1053. 1683. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, E.J. LaVoie, and S.S. Hecht: Biochemistry, pharmacokinetics and carcinogenicity of nicotine-derived nitrosamines; in: The pharmacology of nicotine, edited by M.J. Rand and K. Thurau, Washington, DC (1988) 43–60. 1684. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, D. Lisk, I. Fisenne, and K.D. Brunnemann: Toxic and carcinogenic agents in dry and moist snuff; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 79 (1987) 1281–1286. 1685. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, J.J. Piade, and S.S. Hecht: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXVIII. Analysis of volatile and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in tobacco products; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Formation and occurrence, edited by E.A. Walker, L. Griciute, M. Castegnaro, and M. Borszonyi, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 31 (1980) 507–514. 1686. Hoffmann, D., J.D. Adams, N. Vinchkoski, and T.C. Tso: On the fate of nicotine-C14 during leaf curing and smoking; CORESTA 1982 Symp., Winston-Salem, NC, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper S04, 14–15. 1687. Hoffmann, D., S. Amin, K.D. Brunnemann, D. Desai, and A.C. Collins: On the modulation of nicotine: Studies on 2-methylnicotine; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 29, 1999, p. 35. 1688. Hoffmann, D., S. Amin, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Prokopczyk, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht Tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines: Analysis, bioassays and biochemical studies; in: S.V. Bhide and K.V.K. Rao: N-Nitroso compounds, New Delhi, India (1990) 59–79. 1689. Hoffmann, D., N.L. Benowitz, A.K. Armitage, and A. Leone: Letter to the Editor in response to Editorial by A.K. Armitage: Other people’s smoke - will it really kill you? J. Smoking-Related Dis. 6 (1995) 131–133. 1690. Hoffmann, D. and K.D. Brunnemann: GC-TEA of volatile nitrosamines from tobacco products; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, T. Spiegelhalder, I.K.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1327
11/24/08 2:39:44 PM
1328
1691.
1692. 1693.
1694.
1695.
1696.
1697.
1698.
1699.
1700.
1701.
1702.
1703.
1704.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 363–366. Hoffmann, D. and K.D. Brunnemann: On the endogenous formation of N-nitrosopyrrolidine in cigarette smokers; Cancer Res. 43 (1983) 5570–5574. Hoffmann, D. and K.D. Brunnemann: Smoke analysis of hand-rolled cigarettes; Manuscript (1989). Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and J.D. Adams: Analysis of selected components in the smoke of little cigars; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, 1978, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S12, 119–120. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and J.D. Adams: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine (TSNA): Recent progress on occurrence, formation and reduction; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper S15, 55. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and N.J. Haley: Indoor pollution by tobacco smoke: Model studies on the uptake by nonsmokers; in: Indoor air, radon, passive smoking, particulates, and housing epidemiology; Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Stockholm, Sweden, Vol. 2 (1984) 313–318. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and S.S. Hecht: Formation and analysis of N-nitrosamines in tobacco products and their endogenous formation in consumers; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relationship to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 743–762. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and S.S. Hecht: Laboratory studies on snuff-dipping and oral cancer; Cancer J. 1 (1986) 10–13. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: N-Nitrosamines in human carcinogenesis; in: Nitrosamines and human cancer, Banbury Report 12, edited by P.N. Magee, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982) 211–225. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, G.B. Gori, and E.L. Wynder: On the chemistry and carcinogenicity of marijuana smoke compared with tobacco cigarette smoke; Rec. Adv. Phytochem. 9 (1975) 63–81. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, N.J. Haley, D.W. Sepkovic, and J.D. Adams: Nicotine uptake by nonsmokers exposed to passive smoking under controlled conditions and the elimination of cotinine; in: Indoor air, edited by B. Seifert, H. Esdorn, M. Fischer, H. Ruden, and J. Wegner 87 (1987) 13–17. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and I. Hoffmann: Significance of benzene in tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Mod. Environ. Toxicol. 16 (1989) 99–112. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, B. Prokopczyk, and M.V. Djordjevic: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and Areca-derived N-nitrosamines: Chemistry, biochemistry, carcinogenicity, and relevance to humans; J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 41 (1994) 1–52. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and G. Rathkamp: Unpublished data noted in D. Hoffmann and E.L. Wynder: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XVIII] Smoke of cigarettes and little cigars: An analytical comparison; Science; 178 (1972) 1197–1199. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: N-Nitrosodiethanolamine: Analysis, formation in
1705.
1706.
1707.
1708.
1709.
1710.
1711.
1712.
1713.
1714.
1715.
1716. 1717.
1718.
tobacco products and carcinogenicity in Syrian golden hamsters; Proc. 7th Internat. Mtg on N-Nitroso Compounds: Occurrence and Biological Effects, Tokyo, Japan (1981). Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: N-Nitrosodiethanolamine: Analysis, formation in tobacco products and carcinogenicity in Syrian golden hamsters; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982) 299–308. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, I. Schmeltz, and E.L. Wynder: Trace analysis in respiratory carcinogenesis; 9th Mat. Res. Symp., Natl. Bureau Std., Gaithersburg, MD. in: Trace organic analysis: A new frontier in analytical chemistry (1978) 131–141. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and S. Venitt: Carcinogenic nitrosamines in oral snuff; Lancet (1988) 1232. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and K.S. Webb: Volatile nitrosamines in tobacco and mainstream smoke and sidestream smoke and indoor environments; in: Environmental carcinogens: Selected methods of analysis, Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, I.K. O’Neill, O. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No.45 (1983) 69–83. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, and E.L. Wynder: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. A comparison of selected constituents in the smoke of some commercial cigarettes; Manuscript (1974) see www.rjrtdocs.com 501630010 -0017. Hoffmann, D., A. Castonguay, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: Comparative carcinogenicity and metabolism of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and N’-nitrosonornicotine in Syrian golden hamsters; Cancer Res. 41 (1981) 2386–2393. Hoffmann, D., C.H.B. Chen, and S.S. Hecht: Toxicological dimensions: The role of volatile and nonvolatile N-nitrosamines in tobacco carcinogenesis; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 113–127. Hoffmann, D. and M.V. Djordjevic: Chemical composition and carcinogenicity of smokeless tobacco; Adv. Dental Res. 11 (1997) 322–329. Hoffmann, D., M.V. Djordjevic, and K.D. Brunnemann: New brands of oral snuff; Food Chem. Toxicol. 29 (1991) 65–68. Hoffmann, D., M.V. Djordjevic, and K.D. Brunnemann: Changes in cigarette design and composition over time and how they influence the yields of smoke constituents. J. Smoking-Related Dis. 6 (1995) 9–23. Hoffmann, D., M.V. Djordjevic, J. Fan, E. Zang, T. Glynn, and G.N. Connolly: Five leading U.S. commercial brands of moist snuff in 1994: Assessment of carcinogenic N-nitrosamines; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87 (1995) 1862–1869. Hoffmann, D., M.V. Djordjevic, and I. Hoffmann: The changing cigarette; Prev. Med. 26 (1997) 427–434. Hoffmann, D., M. Dong, and S.S. Hecht: Origin in tobacco smoke of N’-nitrosonornicotine, a tobacco-specific carcinogen. A brief communication; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58 (1977) 1841–1844. Hoffmann, D., G.B. Gori, and T.C. Tso: The less harmful cigarette; Prev. Med. 9 (1980) 287–296.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1328
11/24/08 2:39:44 PM
1329
Bibliography
1719. Hoffmann, D., N.J. Haley, J.D. Adams, and K.D. Brunnemann: Tobacco sidestream smoke: Uptake by smokers; Prev. Med. 13 (1984) 608–617. 1720. Hoffmann, D., N.J. Haley, K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and E.L. Wynder: Cigarette sidestream smoke: Formation, analysis, and model studies on the uptake by nonsmokers; U.S.-Japan Mtg., New Etiology of Lung Cancer, Honolulu, Hawaii (1983). 1721. Hoffmann, D., N.J. Haley, K.D. Brunnemann, and E.L. Wynder: On the endogenous formation of N-nitrosamines in cigarette smokers; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 24 (1983) 61–63. 1722. Hoffmann, D., N.J. Haley, I. Fisenne, J.D. Adams, and K.D. Brunnemann: Carcinogenic agents in snuff; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 76 (1986) 435–437. 1723. Hoffmann, D. and C.C. Harris (Editors): Mechanisms in tobacco carcinogenesis; Banbury Report 23; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1986). 1724. Hoffmann, D. and S.S. Hecht: Tobacco and tobacco smoke (Volatile and tobacco-specific nitrosamines General aspects); in: Environmental carcinogens: Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6, N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, I.K. O’Neill, O. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 63–67. 1725. Hoffmann, D. and S.S. Hecht: Nicotine-derived N-nitrosamines and tobacco-related cancer: Current status and future directions; Cancer Res. 45 (1985) 935–944. 1726. Hoffmann, D. and S.S. Hecht: Smokeless tobacco and cancer; Sci. Pharmakol. 2 (1988) 46–52. 1727. Hoffmann, D. and S.S. Hecht: Advances in tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Chemical carcinogenesis and mutagenesis, edited by C.S. Cooper and P. Grover, SpringerVerlag, London, UK (1990) 64–102. 1728. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, K.D. Brunnemann, and E.L. Wynder: Analysis and formation of N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 190; CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition, 1976: Paper SO17, 105. 1729. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, N.J. Haley, K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and E.L. Wynder: Tobacco carcinogenesis: Metabolic studies in humans; in: Human carcinogenesis, edited by C.C. Harris and H.N. Autrup, Academic Press, New York, NY (1983) 809–832. 1730. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, N.J. Haley, K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and E.L. Wynder: Tumorigenic agents in tobacco products and their uptake by chewers, smokers and nonsmokers; J. Cell. Biochem. 9 (Part C, Suppl.) (1985) 33. 1731. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, A.A. Melikian, N.J. Haley, K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, and E.L. Wynder: Tumorigenic agents in tobacco products and their uptake by chewers, smokers, and non-smokers; Biochem. Mol. Epidemiol. Cancer (1986) 191–204. 1732. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, and R.M. Ornaf: Nonvolatile N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1974 Spec. Edition: Paper No. 36. 1733. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, R.M. Ornaf, and E.L. Wynder: N’-Nitrosonornicotine in tobacco; Science 186 (1974) 265–267. 1734. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, R.M. Ornaf, E.L. Wynder, and T.C. Tso: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XLII.
1735.
1736.
1737.
1738.
1739. 1740.
1741.
1742.
1743.
1744.
1745.
1746.
1747.
1748.
1749.
Nitrosonornicotine: Presence in tobacco, formation and carcinogenicity; in: Environmental N-nitrosamines: Analysis and formation, edited by E.A. Walter, P. Bogovski, and L. Griciute, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 14 (1976) 307–320. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, I. Schmeltz, K.D. Brunnemann, and E.L. Wynder: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XLIV.] New separation techniques for classes of smoke compounds; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 1 (1975) 97–122. Hoffmann, D., S.S. Hecht, and E.L. Wynder: Tumor promoters and cocarcinogens in tobacco carcinogenesis; Environ. Hlth. Perspect. 50 (1983) 247–257. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: Significance of exposure to sidestream tobacco smoke; in: Environmental carcinogens. Method of analysis and exposure measurement. Vol. 9. Passive smoking, edited by I.K. O’Neill, K.D. Brunnemann, B. Dodet, and D. Hoffmann, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 81 (1987) 8–10. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: On the reduction of nicotine in cigarette smoke; in: Nicotine, smoking, and the low-tar programme, edited by N. Wald and P. Froggatt, Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1988) 200–211. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: Tobacco consumption and lung cancer; Cancer Treat. Res. 72 (1995) 1–42. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. C.] The changing cigarette: 1950–1995; J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 50 (1997) 307–364. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: Tobacco smoke components. Letter to the Editor; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 49–52. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: [Cigar smoke:] Chemistry and toxicology; Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 9 (1998) 55–104. Hoffmann, D. and I. Hoffmann: The changing cigarette: Chemical studies and bioassays; Chapter 5 in: Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine, NCI Smoking and tobacco control, Monograph 13, edited by D.M. Burns and N.L. Benowitz, Bethesda, MD (2001) 159–191. Hoffmann, D., I. Hoffmann, and K. El-Bayoumy: The less harmful cigarette: A controversial issue. A tribute to Ernst L. Wynder; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14 (2001) 767–790. Hoffmann, D., I. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Lung cancer and the changing cigarette; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 449–459. Hoffmann, D., E.J. LaVoie, and S.S. Hecht: Nicotine: A precursor for carcinogens; Cancer Lett. 26 (1985) 67–75. Hoffmann, D., Y. Masuda, and E.L. Wynder: A-Naphthylamine and B-naphthylamine in cigarette smoke; Nature 221 (1969) 254–256. Hoffmann, D. and V. Mazzola: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XI. Dibenzofurans in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 183–188. Hoffmann, D., A.A. Melikian, J.D. Adams, K.D. Brunnemann, and N.J. Haley: New aspects of tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Carcinogenesis. A comprehensive
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1329
11/24/08 2:39:44 PM
1330
1750.
1751,
1752.
1753.
1754.
1755.
1756.
1757.
1758.
1759.
1760.
1761.
1762.
1763.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
survey, edited by M. Mass et al., Raven Press, New York, NY (1985) 239–256. Hoffmann, D., A.A. Melikian, and K.D. Brunnemann: Studies in tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 482–484. Hoffmann, D., A.A. Melikian, and E.L. Wynder: Scientific challenges in environmental carcinogenesis. Preventive Med. 25 (1996) 14–22. Hoffmann, D., C.P. Patrianakos, K.D. Brunnemann, and G.B. Gori: On the analysis of vinyl chloride in tobacco smoke; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 17, 1975, p. 17; Hoffmann, D., Patrianakos CP, and K.D. Brunnemann: Chromatographic determination of vinyl chloride in tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 47–50. Hoffmann, D., R. Raineri, S.S. Hecht, R. Maronpot, and E.L. Wynder: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XIV. Effect of N’-nitrosonornicotine and N’-nitrosoanabasine in rats; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 55 (1975) 977–981. Hoffmann, D. and G. Rathkamp: Unpublished 1966 findings cited in E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis, Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) 526. Hoffmann, D. and G. Rathkamp: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. III. Primary and secondary nitroalkanes in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 124–134. Hoffmann, D. and G. Rathkamp: Quantitative analysis of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in tobacco and cigarette smoke; CORESTA Mtg., Stockholm, Sweden (1968); Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. V. Quantitative determination of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides in cigarette tobacco and its smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 201–214. Hoffmann, D. and G. Rathkamp: Quantitative determination of 1-alkylindoles in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 42 (1970) 366–370. Hoffmann, D. and G. Rathkamp: Quantitative determination of nitrobenzenes in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 42 (1970) 1643–1647. Hoffmann, D. and G. Rathkamp [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XIV.] Quantitative determination of fluorenes in cigarette smoke and their formation by pyrosynthesis; Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 899–904. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, K.D. Brunnemann and E.L. Wynder: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXII. On the profile analysis of tobacco smoke; Sci. Total Environ. 2 (1973) 157–171. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and Y. Liu: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXVI. On the isolation of volatile and nonvolatile N-nitrosamines and hydrazines in cigarette smoke; in: N-Nitrosamines in the environment, edited by P. Bogovski and E.A. Walker, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 9 (1974) 159–165. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and S. Nesnow: Quantitative determination of 9-methylcarbazoles in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 41 (1969) 1256–1259. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, S. Nesnow, and E.L. Wynder: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XVI. Fluoranthenes: Quantitative determination in cigarette
1764.
1765.
1766.
1767.
1767a.
1768.
1768a.
1769.
1770.
1771.
1772.
1773.
1774.
1775.
smoke, formation by pyrolysis, and tumor initiation activity; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 49 (1972) 1165–1175. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and J. Rubin: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. II. Comparison of yields of several selected components in the smoke from five major Turkish tobacco varieties; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 5 (1967) 37–38. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and H. Woziwodzki: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. VI. Quantitative determination of carbazoles in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 253–263. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and E.L. Wynder: Comparison of the yields of several selected components in the smoke from different tobacco products; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 31 (1963) 627–637. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and E.L. Wynder: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. IX. Quantitative analysis of chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 140–148. Hoffmann, D., G. Rathkamp, and E.L. Wynder: Chemical analysis of a PAH concentrate from cigarette smoke; CORESTA Bull. (1971) 70–71. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, R. Abbi, and E.L. Wynder: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. Effect of the fat content of the diet on the carcinogenicity of 4(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in F344 rats; Cancer Res. 53 (1993) 2758–2761. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, J.D. Adams A. Juchatz, N. Vinchkoski, and S.S. Hecht: Effects of route of administration and dose on the carcinogenicity of N-nitrosodiethanolamine in the Syrian golden hamster; Cancer Res. 43 (1983) 2521–2524. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, S. Amin, and S.S. Hecht: Dose-response study of the carcinogenicity of tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines in F344 rats; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 108 (1984) 81–86. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, K.D. Brunnemann, and S.S. Hecht, Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNA) and their relevance to human cancer; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 116 (Suppl., Pt. 2) (1990) 1089. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, F.L. Chung, and S.S. Hecht: Relevance of nicotine-derived N-nitrosamines in tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Effects of nicotine on biological systems, edited by F.X. Adlkofer and K. Thurau, Adv. Pharmacol. Sci., Biohäuser Verlag, Birkhauser, Basel, Switzerland (1991) 89–101. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, F.L. Chung, and S.S. Hecht: Nicotine-derived N-nitrosamines and their relevance in tobacco carcinogenesis; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 21 (1991) 305–311. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, F.L. Chung, and E.L. Wynder, Potential inhibitors of tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Tobacco smoking and nutrition: Influence of nutrition on tobacco-associated health risks, edited by J.N. Diana and W.A. Pryor, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 686 (1993) 140–160. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: The role of nicotine in tobacco carcinogenesis. Tribute R. Truhaut; Fac. Pharm., Univ. Paris, Paris, France (1984) 491–495. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: The biological significance to tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines: Smoking and adenocarcinoma of the lung; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 6 (1996) 199–211.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1330
11/24/08 2:39:44 PM
1331
Bibliography
1776. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, S.E. Murphy, F.L. Chung, S. Amin, and S.S. Hecht: Cigarette smoking and adenocarcinoma of the lung. The relevance of nicotine derived N-nitrosamines; J. Smoking Related Dis. 4 (1993) 165–189. 1777. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, E.L. Wynder, and S.S. Hecht: Formation of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines, their carcinogenicity, and the role of dietary fat in their carcinogenicity; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC (1992) Paper No. 119. 1778. Hoffmann, D. and J. Rubin: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. I. The quantitative determination of indoles in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 409–414. 1779. Hoffmann, D., L.D. Sanghvi, and E.L. Wynder: Comparative chemical analysis of Indian bidi and American cigarette smoke; Internat. J. Cancer 14 (1974) 49–53. 1780. Hoffmann, D., I. Schmeltz, S.S. Hecht, and E.L. Wynder: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXIX. On the identification of carcinogens, tumor promoters and cocarcinogens in tobacco smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 125–145. 1781. Hoffmann, D., I. Schmeltz, S.S. Hecht, and E.L. Wynder: Tobacco carcinogenesis; Chapter 4 in: Polycyclic hydrocarbons and cancer, Vol. 1, Chemistry, molecular biology and environment, edited by H.V. Gelboin and P.O. Ts’o, Academic Press, New York, NY(1978) 85–117. 1782. Hoffmann, D., I. Schmeltz, S.S. Hecht, and E.L. Wynder: Tobacco carcinogenesis; Chapter 5 in: H.V. Gelboin and P.O. Ts’o, Polycyclic hydrocarbons and cancer, Vol. 1, Chemistry, molecular biology and environment, Academic Press, New York, NY (1978) 119–130. 1783. Hoffmann, D., T.C. Tso, and G.B. Gori: The less harmful cigarette; Prev. Med. 9 (1980) 287–296. 1784. Hoffmann, D. and J. Vais: Analysis of volatile N-nitrosamines in unaged mainstream smoke of cigarettes; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 23, 1971, p. 14. 1785. Hoffmann, D. and H. Woziwodzki: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. IV. The quantitative determination of free nonvolatile fatty acids in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 167–175. 1786. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Identification of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; 136th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Atlantic City, NJ (1959) Paper No. 16U. 1787. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Short-term determination of carcinogenic aromatic hydrocarbons; Anal. Chem. 32 (1960) 295–296. 1788. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: On the isolation and identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Cancer 13 (1960) 1062–1073. 1789. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Die quantitativen Bestimmung von Phenolen in Tabakrauch [The quantitative determination of phenols in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1961) 101–106. 1790. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Analytical and biological studies on gasoline engine exhaust; Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 91–116. 1791. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Die Filtration von Phenolen aus Cigarettenrauch [The filtration of phenols
1792.
1793.
1794.
1795.
1796.
1797.
1798.
1799.
1800.
1801.
1802.
1803.
1804.
1805.
from cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 51–66; Filtration of phenols from cigarette smoke; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 30 (1963) 67–84. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Unpublished 1963 results discussed in: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis, by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) 246. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Unpublished 1963 results on different tobacco cut widths described in: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis, by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) 530. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 6 (1965) 29; cited in: Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) 634. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: The tumor initiator in tobacco smoke; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 7 (1966) 32. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Beitrag zur carcinogenen Wirkung von Dibenzopyrenen [On the carcinogenic activity of dibenzopyrenes]; Z. Krebsforsch. 68 (1966) 137–149. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: The reduction of tumorigenicity of cigarette smoke condensate by addition of sodium nitrate to tobacco; Cancer Res. 27 (1967) 172–174. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Selective reduction of the tumorigenicity of tobacco smoke. Experimental approaches; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 151–172. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Chemical analysis and carcinogenic bioassays of organic particulate pollutants; in: Air pollution, Vol. 2, 2nd Edition, edited by A.C. Stern, Academic Press, New York, NY (1968) 187–247. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XI. Tumor initiators, tumor accelerators, and tumor promoting activity of condensate fractions; Cancer 27 (1971) 848–864. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XV. Chemical composition and tumorigenicity of tobacco smoke; in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Publishing Co. (1972) 123–147. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Selective reduction of the tumorigenicity of tobacco smoke. II. Experimental approaches; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1855–1868. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: [Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XVIII] Smoke of cigarettes and little cigars: An analytical comparison; Science 178 (1972) 1197–1199. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: The active fraction of cigarette smoke in experimental carcinogenesis. A review; Tob. Res. 1–2 (1975) 89–97. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Selective reduction of tumorigenicity of tobacco smoke. III. The reduction of polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 495–504.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1331
11/24/08 2:39:44 PM
1332
1806. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Environmental respiratory carcinogens; in: Chemical carcinogens, American Chemical Society Monograph 173, 1st Edition, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1976) 324–365. 1807. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Identifizierung und Reduktion von Respirationskarzinogenen [Identification and reduction of respiration carcinogens]; Zent. Bakt. Parasit., Infekt., Hyg. (Abteil 1, Orig. B) 166 (1978) 113–135. 1807a. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Tobacco and tobacco smokeóa continuing public health issue; Tabak (Int) 1982 (1) 83–85. 1808. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Chemical constituents and bioactivity of tobacco smoke; in: Tobacco: A major health hazard, edited by D.G. Zardidze and R. Peto, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 74 (1986) 145–165. 1809. Hoffmann, D., E.L. Wynder, S.S. Hecht, K.D. Brunnemann, E.J. LaVoie, and N.J. Haley: Chemical carcinogens in tobacco; in: Cancer risks. Strategies for elimination, edited by P. Bannaschor, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY (1987) 101–113. 1810. Hoffmann, D., E.L. Wynder, A. Rivenson, E.J. LaVoie, and S.S. Hecht: Skin bioassays in tobacco carcinogenesis; Prog. Exp. Tumor. Res. 26 (1983) 43–67. 1811. Hofmann, E.: Semimicro- and microcolorimetric determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Biochem. Z. 260 (1933) 26–33. 1812. Hofmann, E.: Quantitative spektralanalytische Bestimmung von Nikotin und Pyridin [Quantitative spectral determination of nicotine and pyridine]; Arch. Hyg. 128 (1942) 179–186. 1813. Hoffmann, E., H.T. Schreus, and E. Zurhelle: Beobachtungen zur experimentellen Geschwulsterzeugung durch Teer verschiedener Herkunft und Paraffin [Observations on experimental tumour production by tars from different sources and paraffin]; Deut. Med. Wchnschr. 49 (1923) 633–634. 1814. VOID 1814a. Holden, M.: A study of enzymes that can break down tobacco-leaf components. 3. Fungal polygalacturonase on leaf fibre; Biochem J. 47 (1950) 415–420. 1815. Holland, R.H. and A.R. Acevedo: Current status of arsenic in American cigarettes; Cancer 19 (1966) 1248–1250. 1816. Holland, R.H., R.H. Wilson, A.R. Acevedo, M.S. McCall, D.A. Clark, and H.C. Lanz: Arsenic in regularsized unfiltered and filtered cigarettes; Cancer 11 (1958) 1115–1118. 1817. Holland, R.H., R.H. Wilson, A.R. Acevedo, M.S. McCall, D.A. Clark, and H.C. Lanz: The cigarette smoke-arsenic-cancer of the lung problem; 7th Internat. Cancer Cong., London, England (1958); Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 608–611. 1818. Hollweg, J., H.-J. Schumacher, and F. Seehofer: Automatisierte gaschromatographische Simultanbestimmung von Nicotin und Wasser im Tabakrauchkondensat [Automatic simultaneous gas chromatographic determination of nicotine and water in tobacco smoke condensate]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 39–43. 1819. Holmes, J.C., M.B. Bennett, and E.T. Oakley: A study of the distribution of the humectant during the smoking process using C14-glycerol as a tracer; 14th Tobacco
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1820.
1821.
1822.
1823.
1823a.
1823b.
1824.
1824a.
1824b.
1825.
1826.
1827.
1828.
1829.
Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 6, 1960, p. 6. Holmes, J.C. and W.B. Cridlin: Moisture in the total particulate matter and gas phase of cigarette smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 43 (1960) 515–518. Holmes, J.C. and F.A. Morrell: The mass spectrometer as a quantitative tool. I. Oscilloscopic presentation of mass spectra; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 7, 1955, p. 4. Holzer, G., J. Oró, and W. Bertsch: Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric evaluation of exhaled tobacco smoke; J. Chromatog. 126 (1976) 771–785. Holtzman, R.B. and F.H. Ilcewicz: Lead-210 and polonium-210 in tissues of cigarette smokers; Science 153 (1966) 1259–1260. Homburger, F.: Les rapports entre tabac et cancer: Pathologie expérimentale [The relationship between tobacco and cancer: Experimental pathology]; Med. Hyg. (Switz.) 23 (1965) 179–181. Homburger, F. and A. Treger: Effects of intravenous carcinogen and tobacco condensate injections upon the incidence of lung tumors in A/He mice; in: Lung tumors in animals, edited by L. Severi, Division of Cancer Research, University of Perugia, Italy (1965) 527–536. Homburger, F., A. Treger, and E. Boger: Experimental studies on the inhibition of carcinogenesis by cigarettesmoke condensates and carcinogen-related substances; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 259–270. Hong, M., B.A. Zilinskas, D.C. Knipple, and C.K. Chin: cis-3-Hexanal production in tobacco is stimulated by 16-carbon monounsaturated fatty acids; Phytochemistry 65 (2004) 159–168. Hong, T.-Y., C.-W. Cheng, J.-W. Huang, and M. Meng: Isolation and biochemical characterization of an endo1,3-ß-glucanase from Streptomyces sioyaensis containing a C-terminal family 6 carbohydrate-binding module that binds to 1,3-ß-glucan; Microbiology 148 (2002) 1151–1159. Honglin, S., L. Zhong, W. Baoxing, W. Lan, L. Wei, J. Ciqing, and Y. Guangyu: Determination of volatile phenol in tobacco by solid phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 26, 2002, pp. 33–34. Hopkin, J.M. and P.E. Perry: Benzo[a]pyrene does not contribute to the SCEs induced by cigarette smoke condensate; Mutation Res. 77 (1980) 377–381. Horsewell, H.G. and G.H. Rayner: Improvement relating to cigarette filters; British Patent No. 999,057 (July 21, 1965). Horton, A.D. and M.R. Guerin: Quantitative gas chromatographic determination of smoke components using the sulfur-specific photometric detector; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 17, 1972, pp. 25–26. Horton, A.D. and M.R. Guerin: Determination of acetaldehyde and acrolein in the gas phase of cigarette smoke using cryothermal gas chromatography; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 19–22.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1332
11/24/08 2:39:45 PM
Bibliography
1830. Horton, A.D. and M.R. Guerin: Gas-solid chromatographic determination of carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 57 (1974) 1–7. 1831. Horton, A.D. and M.R. Guerin: Quantitative determination of sulfur compounds in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 90 (1974) 63–70. 1832. Horton, A.D., M.R. Guerin, and G. Olerich: Sulfurcontaining compounds in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 19, 1971, p. 12. 1833. Horton, A.D., M.R. Guerin, J.R. Stokely, and A.S. Meyer: Determination of nitrogen-containing compounds in the gas phase of cigarette smoke by use of the Coulson electrolytic conductivity detector; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 25, 1973, p. 20. 1834. Horton, A.D., J.R. Stokely, and M.R. Guerin: Gas chromatographic determination of nitric oxide (NO) in cigarette smoke; Anal. Lett. 7 (1974) 177–185. 1835. Horton, A.W., D.T. Denman, and R.P. Trosset: Carcinogenesis of the skin. II. The accelerating properties of aliphatic and related hydrocarbons; Cancer Res. 17 (1957) 758–766. 1835a. Hosaka, S., T. Matsushima, I. Hirono, and T. Sugimura: Carcinogenicity of 3-amino-1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b] indole (Trp-P-2), a pyrolysis product of tryptophan; Cancer Lett. 13 (1981) 23–28. 1835b. Hough, L., J.K.N. Jones, and E.L. Richards: The action of ammonia on glucose, maltose and lactose; J. Chem. Soc. (1952).3854–3857. 1835c. Houlgate, P.R., K.S. Dingra, J.S. Nash, and W.H. Evans: Determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in mainstream cigarette smoke by high-performance liquid chromatography; Analyst 114 (1989) 355–360. 1835d. Houminer, Y. and S. Patai: Pyrolytic reactions of carbohydrates. Part II: Thermal decomposition of D-glucose; Israel J. Chem. 7 (1969) 513–524. 1836. Houseman, T.H.: The transfer of radiolabelled nicotine to cigarette smoke; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 9, 1971, p. 7; Studies of cigarette smoke transfer using radioisotopically labelled tobacco constituents: Part II. The transference of radioisotopically labelled nicotine to cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 142–147. 1837. Houseman, T.H. and J.B. Hopper: The transfer of endogenous and radioisotopically labelled exogenous nicotine to cigar smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 36, 1973, p. 25; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 155–159. 1837a. Howard, W.L., T.B. Gage, and S.H. Wender: Isolation of isoquercitrin from tobacco; Arch. Biocehm. 25 (1950) 74–78. 1837b. Hruba, P., D. Honys, D. Twell, V. Capkova, and J. Tupy: Expression of B-galactosidase and B-xylosidase genes during microspore and pollent development; Planta 220 (2005) 931–940. 1838. Hsieh, T.C.Y., K. Kaul, R.A. Laine, and R.L. Lester: Structure of a major glycophosphoceramide from tobacco leaves PSL-1: 2-Deoxy-2-acetamido-Dglucopyranosyl(A1l4)-D-glucopyranosyl-(A1l2) myo-inositol-1-O-phosphoceramide; Biochim. 17 (1978) 3575–3581.
1333
1839. Hsu, F.S., L. Johnson, and M. Buckner: Analysis of 3-vinylpyridine and quinoline in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 35, 1999, p. 39. 1840. Hsu, F.S., S.S. Yang, L. Johnson, I. Smetena, and D. Stagg: Analysis of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 34, 1999, pp. 38–39. 1840a. Hu, W.: Studies on pyrolysis of some phenols used as precursor-aroma compounds in the cigarette industry; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 56, 1996, p. 53. 1841. Huang, C.B., R. Bassfield, B. Dabney, and F. Hsu: Analysis of total ammonia in mainstream smoke; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST13, p. 159; Determination of total ammonia in mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 389–393. 1841a. Huang, J., S. Friedhelm, D.F. Matzinger, and C.S. Levings III: Flower-enhanced expression of a nuclearencoded mitochondrial respiratory protein is associated with changes in mitochondrion number; The Plant Cell 6 (1994) 439–448. 1842. Huber, G.L.: Physical, chemical, and biological properties of tobacco, cigarette smoke, and other tobacco products; in: Tobacco and smoking cessation. I, edited by G.L. Huber, Sem. Resp. Med. 10 (1989) 297–332. 1843. Hubert-Habart, M.R.: Le benzo-3,4 pyrène pyroformé dans les produits de combustion de la cigarette. Détection, dosage, recherche des facteurs d’inhibition [Pyrogenesis of 3,4-benzpyrene in the products from cigarette combustion: Detection, yield, research on inhibition factors]; Thesis, University of Paris (1960). 1844. Hubert-Habart, M., R. Latarjet, D. Lavalette, B. Muel, L. René, and R. Royer: Comparaison des quantités de benzo-3,4 pyrène formées par combustion de divers types de papiers à cigarettes [Comparison of the quantities of 3,4-benzopyrene formed by the combustion of different types of cigarette paper]; Bull. Cancer 53 (1958) 53–56. 1845. Hubert-Habart, M., D. Lavalette, and R. Latarjet: Sur la formation du benzo-3,4 pyrène lors de la combustion de papier à cigarettes préalablement irradié [On the formation of 3,4-benzpyrene during the combustion of previously irradiated cigarette paper]; Bull. Soc. Chim. Franc. (1964) 30–33. 1846. Hubert-Habart, M., B. Muel, R. Royer, and R. Latarjet: Effet inhibiteur de sels mineraux oxygénés sur la formation du benzo-3,4 pyrène lors de combustion du papier à cigarettes [Inhibiting effect of oxygenated mineral salts on the formation of 3,4-benzpyrene during the combustion of cigarette papers]; Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 246 (1958) 1440–1441. 1846a. Hueper, W.C.: Recent developments in environmental cancer. Part III; Arch. Pathol. 58 (1954) 645–682. 1846b. Hukkanen, J., P. Jacob III, and N. L. Benowitz: Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine; Pharmacol. Rev. 57 (2005) 79–115. 1847. Hukusima, Y.: Tobacco constituents. III. Carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke. I. Method of its measurement;
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1333
11/24/08 2:39:45 PM
1334
1848.
1848a.
1849.
1850.
1851.
1852.
1853.
1853a.
1853b.
1854.
1854a.
1855.
1855a.
1856.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
J. Chem. Soc. (Japan) 61 (1940) 889–903, see Chem. Abstr. 36 (1942) 7240. Hukusima, Y, and K. Ooike: Tobacco constituents. IV. Essential oil and resin of tobacco; J. Chem. Soc. (Japan) 61 (1940) 1297–1301. Hunzicker, G.M.: Biotechnological and physiological relevance of the detergent Tween 20 as a novel inducer of higher plant promoters; Ph.D. Thesis, Biochemistry, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany, 2006. Hurd, C.D., R.V. Levetan, and A.R. Macon: Pyrolytic formation of arenes. II. Benzene and other arenes from thiophene, 2-methylthiophene, and 2-(methyl-14C)-thiophene; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84 (1962) 4515–4519. Hurd, C.D. and A.R. Macon: Pyrolytic formation of arenes. IV. Pyrolysis of benzene, toluene, and radioactive toluene; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84 (1962) 4524. Hurd, C.D., A.R. Macon, J.I. Simon, and R.V. Levetan: Pyrolytic formation of arenes. I. Survey of general principles and findings; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84 (1962) 4509–4515. Hurd, C.D. and J.I. Simon: Pyrolytic formation of arenes. III. Pyrolysis of pyridines, picolines, and methylpyrazine; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84 (1962) 4519–4524. Husgafvel-Pursiainen, K., M. Sorsa, M. Moller, and C. Benestad: Genotoxicity and polycyclic hydrocarbon analysis of environmental tobacco smoke samples from restaurants; Mutagenesis 1 (1986) 287–292. Huynh, C.K., T. VuDuc, C. Debonneville, and P. Boiteux: Pollution de l’air intérieur par les hydrocarbures polynucléaires de la fumée de tabac [Pollution of internal air by polynuclear hydrocarbons from tobacco smoke]; Méd. Sociale Prév. 29 (1984) 201–202. Hwang, K.J., H.-K. Kim, J.-T. Lee, I.-H. Oh, J.-W. Park, and S.-E. Cho: Study of the relationship between Hoffmann’s list smoke components and leaf compounds, biological test, physical properties, blending characteristics of Korean tobacco; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 51, 2005, p. 46. Hwang, K.J., M.-S. Rhee, and D. Volgger: Changes of aroma and volatile components of leaf tobacco with different stalk position, grade, treatment temperature and analytical method; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 81, 2004, p. 72. Hwang, K.K., O. Sonko, D.R. Dansie, R.E. Kouri, and C.T. Henry: Deposition and distribution of catechol from whole cigarette smoke in BC-3F-1-CUM mice; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 64 (1982) 405–414. Hyde, R.A.: The effect of cigarette paper permeability and air dilution on carbon monoxide production and diffusion from the tobacco rod; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 28, 1982, p. 15. Iann Rancé, I., J. Fournier, and M.-T. EsquerréTugayé: The incompatible interaction between Phytophthora parasitica var. Nicotianae race 0 and tobacco is suppressed in transgenic plants expressing antisense lipoxygenase sequences; Plant Biol. 95 (1998) 6554–6559. Iida, B., T. Matsuzaki, M. Sano, F. Suzuki, and S. Matsuyama: Chemical components of burley tobacco produced by a new curing process; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 119 (1977) 1–11.
1857. Ikeda, S.: Contribution to the study of tobacco smoke; Sci. Papers, Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. (Tokyo) 42 (1947) 80. 1858. Ikeda, T., T. Matsumoto, K. Kato, and M. Noguchi: Isolation and identification of ubiquinone 10 from cultured cells of tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 38 (1974) 2297–2298. 1858a. Ikemeyer, D. and W. Barz: Comparison of secondary product accumulation in photoautotrophic, photomixotrophic and heterotrophic Nicotiana tabacum cell suspension cultures; Plant Cell Rept. 8 (1989) 479–482. 1859. Im, H., F. Rasouli, and M. Hajaligol: Formation of nitric oxide during tobacco oxidation; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 39, 2003, p. 42. 1859a. Im, Y.J., O. Han, G.C. Chung, and B.H. Cho: Antisense expression of an Arabidopsis omega-3 fatty acid desaturase gene reduces salt/drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants. Mol. Cells 13 (2002) 264–271. 1860. Ingebrethsen, B.J.: Aerosol studies of cigarette smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 12 (1986) 54–142. 1860a. Ingebrethsen, B.J.: An investigation of nicotine mass transport during smoking using a model aerosol computer simulation; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 60, 2005, p. 51. 1860b. Ingebrethsen, B.J.: Evolution of the particle size distribution of mainstream cigarette smoke during a puff; Aerosol Sci. Tech. 5 (1986) 423–433. 1860c. Ingebrethsen, B.J.: The physical properties of mainstream cigarette smoke and their relation to deposition in the respiratory tract; in: Extrapolation of dosimetric relationships for inhaled particles and gases, edited by J.D. Crapo, E.D. Smolko, F.J. Miller, J.A. Graham, and A.W. Hayes, Academic Press, New York, NY(1989) 125–142. 1860d. Ingebrethsen, B.J., D.L. Heavner, A.L. Angel, J.M. Conner, T.J. Steichen, and C.R. Green: A comparative study of environmental tobacco smoke particulate matter measurements in an environmental chamber; J. Air Pollut. Cont. Assoc. 38 (1988) 413–417. 1860e. Ingebrethsen, B.J. and S.B. Sears: Particle size distribution of sidestream cigarette smoke; 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 47, 1985, p. 25. 1860f. Ingebrethsen, B.J.: and S.B. Sears: Particle evaporation of sidestream cigarette smoke in a stirred tank; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 131 (1990) 526–536. 1861. Ingram, D.J.E.: Electron resonance studies of the free radicals produced in tobacco pyrolysis and in other related compounds; Acta Med. Scand. Supp. 369 (1961) 43–62. 1862. Ingram, D.J.E. and B.T. Allen: Radicals in cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 36 (1959) 560. 1863. Innerarity, L.T., E.C. Smith and S.H. Wender: Studies in removal of glucose from scopolin in tobacco seedlings; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 86–87. 1863a. Innerarity, L.T., E.C. Smith, and S.H. Wender: The conversion of scopoletin-4–14C into scopolin and fabiatrin in tobacco seedlings; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 1389–1398. 1863b. Inoguchi, M., H. Kamada, and H. Harada: Agropine synthesis of a ti-transformed tobacco line; J. Plant Physiol. 136 (1990) 680–684.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1334
11/24/08 2:39:45 PM
1335
Bibliography
1864. Institute of Cancer Research: Polonium (210Po) in tobacco smoke and in the environment; See Tob. Bibliograph. 12(3) (1965) 321 (1965). 1864a. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Certain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic compounds; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 3 (1973) 247–253. 1865. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man. Some aromatic amines, hydrazines and related substances, N-nitroso compounds and miscellaneous alkylating agents; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 4 (1973) pp. 7–111. 1866. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some N-nitroso compounds; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 17 (1978). 1867. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 4 (1982) 74–99. 1868. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Benzene; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 7 (1975) 203–211; Monograph 29 (1982) 93–148. 1868a. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Benz[a]anthracene; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Part 1. Chemical, environmental and experimental data; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 32 (1983) 135–145. 1869. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Tobacco habits other than smoking: Betel-quid and arecanut chewing and some related nitrosamines; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 37 (1985). 1870. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Tobacco smoking; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 38 (1986). 1871. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chemistry and analysis of tobacco smoke; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Tobacco smoking; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 38 (1986) 83–126, 387–394. 1872. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chemistry and analysis of tobacco smoke; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Tobacco smoking. IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 38 (1986) 83–126, 387–394. See p. 87 and pp. 391–392 for listing of N-nitrosamines. 1873. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chemistry and analysis of tobacco smoke; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Tobacco smoking. IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 38 (1986) 83–126, 387–394: See pp. 100–102 and 390–391 for listing of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. 1873a. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans; IARC Monograph 7 (1987) 211–216. 1874. Irby, R.M., E.P. Barbee, and B.C. Mitchell: The chromatographic determination of menthol in the mainstream smoke and tobacco of mentholated cigarettes; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program
1875.
1876.
1877. 1877a.
1878.
1878a.
1879.
1880.
1881.
1882.
1883.
1884.
1885.
1886.
1887.
1887a.
Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 29, 1962, p. 16. Irby, R.M. and E.S. Harlow: Quantitative determination of certain vapor phase constituents of tobacco smoke; 133rd Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., San Francisco, CA (1958); Cigarette smoke. I. Determination of certain vapor constituents; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 52–56. Irvine, W.J. and M.J. Saxby: The constituents of certain tobacco types. I. Steam volatile phenols of Latakia; Phytochemistry 7 (1968) 277–281. Irvine, W.J. and M.J. Saxby: Steam volatile amines of Latakia tobacco leaf; Phytochemistry 8 (1969) 473–476. Irvine, W.J. and M.J. Saxby: Further volatile phenols of Latakia tobacco leaf; Phytochemistry 8 (1969) 2067–2070. Irwin, W.D.E.: Discussion of a study on the “determination of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke components for cigarette of different tobacco types and a set of reference cigarettes”; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 115–118. Ishiguro, S., H. Sakuma, M. Kusama, S. Yano, N. Shimojima, and S. Sugawara: Glass capillary column gas chromatographic analysis of tobacco and cellulose smoke. I. Acidic fractions; Nippon Sembai Kosha Chuo Kenkyu Hokoku 118 (1976) 207–211. Ishiguro, S., S. Sato, S. Sugawara, and Y. Kaburaki: Comparison of phenols in smokes of lamina and midrib of flue-cured tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 977–982. Ishiguro, S. and S. Sugawara: Comparisons of volatile N-containing compounds in the smokes of lamina and midrib of flue-cured leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 377–382. Ishiguro, S. and S. Sugawara: Comparisons of smoke components in the semivolatile phase from lamina and midrib cigarettes of flue-cured tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 1527–1531. Ishiguro, S. and S. Sugawara: Gas chromatographic analysis of cigarette smoke by trimethylsilylation method; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 218–221. Ishiguro, S. and S. Sugawara: Comparisons of smoke components from lamina and midrib cigarettes of fluecured tobacco leaves by trimethylsilylation method; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 407–410. Ishiguro, S. and S. Sugawara: The chemistry of tobacco smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 298 (1980) 1–248. Ishiguro, S., Y. Watanabe, and T. Okada: Formation of volatile nitrosamines in sidestream smoke from cellulose cigarettes impregnated with various N-containing compounds; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 37, 1984, p. 20. Ishiguro, S., S. Yano, S. Sugawara, and Y. Kaburaki: Comparisons of acids in the smokes of lamina and midrib of flue-cured leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 2005–2011. Ishizu, Y., K. Kaneki, and K. Izawa: Smoke production from cell wall materials of tobacco leaves; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 15 (1991) 1–10. Ishizu, Y., K. Kaneki, and T. Okada: A new method to determine the relationship between the particle size and chemical composition of smoke particles; J. Aerosol Sci. 18 (1987) 123–129.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1335
11/24/08 2:39:45 PM
1336
1888. VOID 1889. Ito, Y., H. Banno, T. Moribe, K. Hinata, and Y. Machida: NPK15, a tobacco protein-serine/threonine kinase with a single hydrophobic region near the amino-terminus; Molecular Gen. Genetics 245 (1994) 1–10. 1890. Ivanov, N.: Paper chromatographic investigation of tobacco alkaloids in cigarettes and cigarette smoke; Bulg. Tyutyun 4 (1959) 355–357. 1891. Ivanov, N.: Study of alkaloids in Bulgarian cigarettes by means of filter paper chromatography; Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 12 (1959) 317–320. 1892. Ivanov, N.: Factors influencing tobacco smoke composition; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 188–189. 1893. Ivanov, N. and I. Ognyanov: Composition of resins isolated from Bulgarian Dzhebel tobacco leaves and their effect on aroma of smoke; Bulg. Tyutyun 11 (1966) 31–35. 1893a. Ivanov, N. and I. Ognyanov: Solanesol and its esters in neutral extractive fraction of Bulgarian Oriental tobacco; Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 18 (1965) 1123–1126. 1893b. Ivanov, N. and I. Ognyanov: Les résins des tabacs orientaux de Bulgarie [On resins in Bulgarian Oriental tobacco]; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 779–785. 1894. Ivanov, N. and I. Ognyanov: Myristone (14-heptacosanone) in Bulgarian Oriental tobacco; Dokl. Bolg. Akad. Nauk. 22 (1969) 743–745. 1895. Ivanov, N.G., L. Gyuzelev, and A. Boneva: Über die Brennfähigkeit von Tabak [The combustibility of tobacco]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 111–116. 1896. Ivicic, N., L. Tomic, and V.I. Simeon: Cadmium and lead in cigarettes and in smoke condensate; Arch. Hig. Rada Toksikol. 36 (1985) 157–164. 1897. Izard, C. and P. Morée-Testa: Mitoclastic activity and chromosome aberrations induced by A- and B-naphthonitrile identified in a fraction of cigarette smoke tar; Compt. Rend. 272D (1971) 2581–2583. 1898. Izard, C., J. LaCharpagne, and P. Testa: Sur l’activité biologique de divers condensats de fumée de cigarettes, revelée par les tests auxiniques [On the biological activity of different cigarette smoke condensates, determined by auxinic tests]; Compt. Rend. 262D (1966) 1859–1861. 1899. Izard C, P. Morée-Testa, I. Chouroulinkov, P. Lazar, and C. Libermann: Fractionation of cigarette smoke prior to bioassays for carcinogenicity; Biomedicine 20 (1974) 205–213. 1900. Izawa, M.: Review of studies of tobacco smoke; Nippon Senbai Kosha (1961). 1901. Izawa, M. and Y. Kobashi: Analysis of tobacco smoke. II. Distribution of nicotine in smoke and butt. Comparison between “King-Size” and regular-size cigarettes; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 30 (1956) 332–335. 1902. Izawa, M. and Y. Kobashi: Analysis of tobacco smoke. IV. Fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate. I. Lowboiling nitrogenous fractions; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 357–363. 1903. Izawa, M. and Y. Kobashi: Some volatile acids and esters of cigarette smoke; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 22 (1958) 47–52. 1904. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, M. Motomatsu, and H. Hoshaku: Studies on tobacco smoke. Part IV. Some volatile acids
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
1905.
1906.
1907.
1908.
1909.
1910.
1911.
1912.
1913.
1914.
1915.
1916.
1916a.
and esters of cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 99 (1958) 72–77. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, and S. Sakaguchi: Fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate. II. Neutral components of cigarette smoke; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 364–369. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, and S. Sakaguchi: Studies on tobacco smoke. Part VIII. Phenolic components in cigarette smoke; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 23 (1959) 194–197; Phenolic components in cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 101 (1959) 33–36. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, S. Sakaguchi, C. Tokura, M. Motomatsu, and T. Fukaya: Studies on tobacco smoke. Part V. Some neutral components of cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 99 (1958) 66–71. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, S. Sakaguchi, C. Tokura, M. Motomatsu, T. Fukaya, and M.Watanabe: Studies on filter-tipped cigarettes. I. Investigations on nicotine absorption, oiling materials, and plasticizers; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 99 (1958) 81–86. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, and M. Taki: Studies on tobacco smoke. Part VII. Influence of pinholes in cigarettes on nicotine transfer into cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 99 (1959) 78–80. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, and M. Taki: Free amino acids in cigarette smoke. I. Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 23 (1959) 198–200; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 101 (1959) 34–38. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, C. Tokura, M. Motomatsu, and T. Fukaya: Studies on tobacco smoke. Part IV. Fractionation of cigarette smoke components and some low boiling nitrogenous compounds; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp 99 (1958) 60–65. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, C. Tokura, M. Motomatsu, T. Fukaya, and T. Yamamoto: Studies on tobacco smoke. I. Distribution of nicotine in smoke and butt of cigarettes. 1. Comparison of regular-size cigarettes according to quantities of shredded tobacco filler; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 96 (1956) 79–84. Izawa, M., Y. Kobashi, C. Tokura, and S. Sakaguchi: Studies on tobacco smoke. I. Distribution of nicotine in smoke and butt of cigarettes. 2. Comparison of king-size and regular-size cigarettes; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 96 (1956) 86–90. Izawa, M. and M. Taki: Free amino acids in cigarette smoke. II. Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 23 (1959) 201– 206; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 101 (1959) 40–44. Jacin, H.: Quantitative determination of nitrate in tobacco using a specific ion electrode; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 5, 1969, p. 5; Tob. Sci 14 (1970) 28–30. Jacin, H., J.M. Slanski, and R.J. Moshy: Quantitative determination of free sugars in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 136–138. Jack, A., L. Bush, and J. Calvert: Effects of USA and Malawian cultural practices on TSNA accumulation in burley tobacco in Kentucky; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 27, 2005, p. 33.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1336
11/24/08 2:39:46 PM
1337
Bibliography
1916b. Jägerstad, M., A. Laser Reuterswärd, R. Oste, and A. Dahlqvist: Creatinine and Maillard reaction products as precursors of mutagenic compounds formed in fried beef; in: The Maillard reaction in foods and nutrition, edited by G.R. Waller and M.S. Feather, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1983) pp. 507–519. 1917. James, A.T. and A.J.P. Martin: Gas-liquid partition chromatography: The separation and micro-estimation of volatile fatty acids from formic acid to dodecanoic acid; J. Biochem. 50 (1952) 679–690. 1918. James, W.B.: Ion exchange chromatography of amino acids in tobacco; RDR, 1961, No. 18, April 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936415 -6442. 1919. James, W.B.: Free amino acids in aging tobacco; RDR, 1961, No. 26, May 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936574 -6642. 1919a. Jamet, E., C. Fargeas, A. Durr, and J. Fleck: Nucleotide sequences of two genes encoding the small subunit of RUBISCO in Nicotians sylvestris; Nucleic Acids Res. 18 (1990) 4589. 1920. Jang, G.C., H.H. Rha, S.B. Han, J.Y. Bock, U.C. Lee, S.O. Bak, and M.S. Lee: Studies on the CO/tar ratio control in mainstream cigarette smoke with cigarette materials; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 55, 1995, p. 51. 1921. Janjigian, K., T.A. Perfetti, C.R. Green, F.W. Conrad Jr, J.M. Rivers, L.A. Smith, and R.W. Hawley: Nicotine just noticeable difference study of full flavor non-menthol 85mm products; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 146–151. 1921a. Janzowski, C., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Occurrence and analysis of N-nitroso-3-hydroxypyrrolidine in cured meat products; J. Chromatog. 150 (1978) 216–220. 1921b. Janzowski, C., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Occurrence of N-nitrosamino acids in cured meat products and their effect on formation of N-nitrosamines during heating; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 16 (1978) 343–348. 1922. Japan Monopoly Corporation: Literature review on tobacco smoke, its constituents, and other properties; Japan Monopoly Corp. (1961) pp. 1–241. 1923. Jarboe, C.H. and A.D. Quinn: Low temperature column chromatography of tobacco acids; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 168–171. 1923a. Jarboe, C.H. and C.J. Rosene: Volatile products of pyrolysis of nicotine; J. Chem. Soc. (1961) 2455–2458. 1924. Jarrell, J.E. and R. de la Burde: A study of the major gaseous constituents in mainstream smoke of a cigarette; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 8, 1963, p. 9; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 5–11. 1925. Jarrell, J.E. and J.E. Wickham: Moisture in total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 18, 1961, p. 9; The determination of moisture in the total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 154–157. 1926. Jeanty, G., J. Masse, P. Barcot, and D. Coq: Quantitative analysis of cigarette smoke condensate monophenols by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 245–250. 1927. Jeffrey, R.N.: Alkaloid composition of species of Nicotiana; 11th Tobacco Chemists’ Research
1927a.
1928.
1929.
1930.
1931.
1932.
1933.
1933a.
1933b.
1934.
1935.
1936.
1937.
Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 11, Paper No. 1, 1957, p. 4; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 89–93. Jeffrey, R.N. and R.B. Griffith: Changes in the chlorophyll and carotene contents of curing burley tobacco cut at different stages of maturity; Plant Physiol. 22 (1947) 34–41. Jeney, K. and L. Nemeth: The qualification of cigarette tobacco on the basis of smoke investigations; Dohanykutato Intezet Kozlemenyei 1 (1958) 9–12. See Chem. Abstr. 53 (1959) 20704i. Jenkins, C.B. and A.B. Canon: An automated method of determining nitric oxide in smoke; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 15, 1979, p. 8. Jenkins, R.A. and B.E. Gill: Procedure for the determination of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide in cigarette smoke by chemiluminescent analysis; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 35, 1978, p. 19; Determination of oxides of nitrogen (NOx) in cigarette smoke by chemiluminescent analysis; Anal. Chem. 52 (1978) 925–928. Jenkins, R.A., R.B. Quincy, and M.R. Guerin: Carbon monoxide deliveries of commercial cigarettes: Relationship to other smoke constituents; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 16, 1979, p. 8. Jenkins, R.A., S.K. White, W.H. Griest, and M.R. Guerin: Chemical characterization of the smokes of selected U.S. commercial cigarettes: Tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen, hydrogen cyanide and acrolein; ORNL Rept: 5 (1983). Jenkins, R.W. Jr: A review of the uses of nuclear radiation in tobacco and smoke research; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1990) 353–378. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.A. Comes, and R.T. Bass: The use of carbon-14 labelled compounds in smoke precursor studies: A review; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 1 (1975) 1–30. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, B.W. Francis, H. Flachsbart, W. Stober, R.B. Tucci, and T.G. Williamson: Selected inorganic chemical composition of mainstream cigarette smoke as a function of aerodynamic particle size; J. Aerosol Sci. 13 (1982) 459–468. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, C. Goldey, and T.G. Williamson: Neutron activation analysis in tobacco and cigarette smoke studies. 2R1 cigarette composition, smoke transference and butt filtration; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 59–65. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.H. Newman, R.S. Carpenter, and T.S. Osdene: Cigarette smoke formation studies. I. Distribution and mainstream products from added 14C-dotriacontane-16,17; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 295–298. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.H. Newman, and M.K. Chavis: Cigarette smoke formation studies. II. Smoke distribution and mainstream pyrolytic composition of added 14C-menthol (U); 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 31, 1970, p. 22; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 299–301. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.H. Newman, M.D. Edmonds, and T.S. Osdene: Dotriacontane - A precursor to benzo[a] pyrene in smoke? 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1337
11/24/08 2:39:46 PM
1338
1938.
1939.
1940.
1941.
1942. 1943.
1944.
1945.
1946.
1947.
1947a.
1948.
1949.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Paper No. 8, 1972, pp. 12–13; Cigarette smoke formation studies. III. The contribution of dotriacontane to the benzo[a]pyrene content of smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 154–157. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.H. Newman, R.M. Ikeda, R.S. Carpenter, and T.D. Williamson: The determination by neutron activation analysis of selected elements in cigarettes; Anal. Lett. 4 (1971) 451–457. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.H. Newman, G.F. Lester, A.F. Frisch, and T.G. Williamson: Neutron activation analysis in tobacco and cigarette smoke studies. The halogens; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 195–202. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.H. Newman, K.W. Vandenbroek, R.M. Jones, and T.S. Osdene: The determination of the degree of uniformity of labeling in 14C-compounds by reaction gas chromatography; in: Gas chromatography 1972, edited by S.G. Perry, Applied Science Publishers, Ltd. (1973) 261. Jensen, C.O.: Cigar tobacco: Chemical changes that occur during curing; Ind. Eng. Chem. 44 (1952) 306–309. Jensen, C.O. and D. Haley: Studies on the nicotine content of cigarette smoke; J. Agr. Res. 51 (1935) 267–276. Jensen, N.J. and T. Sumpter: Specific structural analysis of solanesol and related compounds by fast atomic bombardment in combination with tandem mass spectrometry; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1995) 85–93. Jensen, N.J. and T. Sumpter: Development of experimental methods for study of gas-phase charge-reversal charge transfer processes of potential interest in smoke chemistry; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1995) 95–105. Jensen, N.J., S. Sumyer, S. Hassam, and R. Izac: TLC-MS and TLC-MS-MS analysis of terpenes with potential application to smoke studies; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 32, 1994, p. 43. Jerina, D.M., R. Lehr, M. Schaefer-Ridden, H. Yagi, J.M. Karle, D.R. Thakker, A.W. Wood, A.Y.H. Lu, D. Ryan, S. West, W. Levi, and A.H. Connery: in: Origins of human cancer, edited by H.H. Hiatt, J.D. Watson, and J.A. Winston, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1977) 639; D.H. Phillips and P. Sims: in: Chemical carcinogenesis and DNA, edited by P.L. Grover, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 29 (1979) 29. Jermini, C., A. Weber, and E. Grandjean: Quantitative Bestimmung verschiedener Gasphasenkomponenten des Nebenstromrauches von Zigaretten in der Raumluft als Beitrag zum Problem des passivrauchens [Quantitative determination of various gas-phase components of the sidestream smoke from cigarettes in room air as a contribution to the passive smoking problem]; Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Hlth. 36 (1976) 169–181. Jezo, I. and I. Luzak: Aminolysis of sucrose. (XI). Reaction of sucrose with aqueous solutions of urea at elevated temperatures; Chem. Zvesti. 21 (1967) 35–43, see Chem. Zvesti. 17 (1963) 126–139, 255–264, 865– 883, Chem. Zvesti. 20 (1966) 586–594. Jida, B., T. Matsuzaki, M. Sans, F. Suzuki, and S. Matsuyama: Chemical components of burley tobacco produced by a new curing process; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 119 (1977) 1–11. Jing, Y., C. Gong, K. Xian, C. Wang, and P. Lu: The effects of filter ventilation on flavor constituents in
1950.
1951.
1952.
1953.
1954.
1955.
1956.
1957.
1958.
1959.
1960.
1961.
1962.
1962a. 1962b.
1963.
1963a.
cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 280–285. Jodl, R.: Über den Einfluss der Glimmsalze des Cigarettenpapiers auf die Abrauchergebnisse von Cigaretten [The influence of burn additives of the cigarette paper on the smoke yields of cigarettes]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 22–24. Johnson, C.E.: A study of cigar tobacco with reference to the less abundant elements; Thesis. Columbia University, New York, NY (1936). Johnson, D.E., J.D. Millar, and J.W. Rhoades: Nitrosamines in tobacco smoke; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 181–189. Johnson, D.E. and J.W. Rhoades: N-Nitrosamines in smoke condensate from several varieties of tobacco; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1845–1847. Johnson, D.P.: Determination of experimental nematocide UC 21149 in flue-cured tobacco and cigarette smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 28, June 1, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500965916 -5929. Johnson, D.P.: An investigation of nitrogen oxide and methyl nitrite in tobacco smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 39, September 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966182 -6184. Johnson. J.: The antioxidant activity of tobacco smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 10, 1973, p. 16; Johnson, J. and M.A. Nisbet: The antioxidant activity of tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 28–33. Johnson, J.D. and J.J. Chapman: Identification of radicals in whole smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 42, 2004, pp. 46–47. Johnson, R.R. and E.D. Alford: Products from the pyrolysis of sucrose; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 29 (1966). Johnson, R.R. and E.D. Alford: Aromatic hydrocarbons from mildly heated tobacco; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 15, 1967, p. 9. Johnson, R.R., E.D. Alford, and G.W. Kinzer: Formation of sucrose pyrolysis products; J. Agr. Food Chem. 17 (1969) 22–24. Johnson, R.R. and J.A. Nicholson: The structure, chemistry and synthesis of solanone. A new anomalous terpenoid ketone from tobacco; J. Org. Chem. 30 (1965) 3918–3921. Johnson, R.R., T. Smith, and J.E. Howes: The formation of methyl chloride in burning cigarettes; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 44, 1970, p. 24. Johnson, W.H.: Curing; Recent Adv. Tob. Res. Inaugural Vol. (1974) 63–78. Johnson, W.R.: Benzo[a]pyrene yield from cigarettes containing aluminum; Memorandum to R.B. Seligman, August 12, 1965, see www.pmdocs.com 1003030249. Johnson, W.R.: The pyrogenesis and physicochemical nature of tobacco smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 3 (1977) 1–27. Johnson, W.R., R.W. Hale, and S.C. Clough: The formation of molecular nitrogen by burning cigarette; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 5, 1972,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1338
11/24/08 2:39:46 PM
1339
Bibliography
1964.
1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.
1972. 1973.
1974.
1975.
1976.
1977.
1977a.
pp. 8–9; Formation of molecular nitrogen by burning cigarette; Nature 244 (1973) 51–52. Johnson, W.R., R.W. Hale, S.C. Clough, N.W. Nedlock, and P.H. Chen: The chemistry of the conversion of nitrate nitrogen to smoke products; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 4, 1972, pp. 6–7; Johnson W.R., R.W. Hale, S.C. Clough, and P.H. Chen: Chemistry of the conversion of nitrate nitrogen to smoke products; Nature 243 (1973) 223–225. Johnson, W.R., R.W. Hale, and N.W. Nedlock: Aliphatic amides in cigarette smoke; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 24, 1971, p. 14; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 73. Johnson, W.R., R.W. Hale, J.W. Nedlock, and H.J. Grubbs: The distribution of products between mainstream and sidestream smoke; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 3, 1972, pp. 4–6; Johnson, W.R., R.W. Hale, J.W. Nedlock, H.J. Grubbs and D.H. Powell: The distribution of products between mainstream and sidestream smoke; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 141–144. Johnson, W.R., J.C. Kang, and H. Wakeham: Mechanisms of HCN formation from the pyrolysis of amino acids and related compounds. CORESTA Bull. (1971) 80–81; Johnson, W.R. and J.C. Kang: Mechanisms of hydrogen cyanide formation from the pyrolysis of amino acids and related compounds; J. Org. Chem. 36 (1971) 189–192. Johnson, W.R., N.W. Nedlock, and R.W. Hale: Mechanisms of the pyrolysis of poly(amino acids); 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 12, 1971, p. 8; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 89–92. Johnson, W.R., D.H. Powell, R.W. Hale, and R.A. Kornfeld: Incorporation of atmospheric oxygen into components of cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1975) 521–522. Johnstone, R.A.W.: Composition of cigarette smoke; Med. Res. Council Ann. Rpt., April 1965-March 1966 (1966) p. 231. Johnstone, R.A.W. and J.R. Plimmer: The chemical constituents of tobacco and tobacco smoke; Chem. Rev. 59 (1959) 885–936. Johnstone, R.A.W. and P.M. Quan: Naphthalenes in cigarette smoke; Nature 199 (1963) 1184. Johnstone, R.A.W. and P.M. Quan: The phytadienes and norphytene and their relation to some components of tobacco smoke; J. Chem. Soc. (1963) 5706–5713. Johnstone, R.A.W. and P.M. Quan: Cyclic dimers of isoprene and their relation to some components of tobacco smoke; J. Chem. Soc. (1963) 2221–2224. Johnstone, R.A.W., P.M. Quan, and W. Carruthers: Composition of cigarette smoke: Some low-boiling components; Nature 195 (1962) 1267–1269. Joigny, C.: Report on carbon monoxide determination by the Gas Phase Task Force; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 193. Jones, G.W., Y. Yant, and L.B. Berger: Carbon monoxide hazards from tobacco smoke; U.S. Bureau of Mines, Repts. of Investigat., Rpt. No. 2539 (1923) pp. 1–6. Jones, L.A., J.C. Holmes, and R.B. Seligman: Spectrophotometric studies of some 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research
1978.
1978a.
1979.
1980.
1981. 1982.
1983.
1984.
1985.
1986.
1986a.
1987.
1988.
1989.
Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper No. 14, 1954, pp. 13–15. Jones, L.A. and R.L. Johnston: The neutral fraction of the aroma of tobacco. I. Hydrocarbons; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 8, 1964, pp. 13–15. Jones, L.A. and R.J. Monroe: A modified flash exchange analysis of aliphatic 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 10, 1964, p.17. Jones, R.T., W.G.D. Lugton, S.R. Massey, and R.B. Richardson: The distribution with respect to smoke particle size of dotriacontane, hexadecane and decachlorobiphenyl added to cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 89–92. Jones, S.O. and P.H. Latimer: Chemical constituents of Turkish tobacco (constituents identified through 1942); RJRT Rpt., January 4, 1943, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503875194 -5202. Jones, T.C. and I. Schmeltz: Pyrolysis of caffeic acid, a tobacco leaf constituent; Chem. Ind. (1968) 1480–1481. Jones, T.C. and I. Schmeltz: Fingerprint gas chromatographic analysis of tobacco leaf acids; Tob. Sci.12 (1968) 10–15. Jones, T.C. and I. Schmeltz: Pyrolysis of t-cinnamic acid, sodium t-cinnamate, styrene, and c- and t-stilbene. Products and implications; J. Org. Chem. 34 (1969) 645–649. Joseph, M.J. and E.W. Cochran: Investigation of methods for the analysis of vapor phase nicotine; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 27, 1998, p. 28. Joseph, M.J. and E.W. Cochran: The application of a diffusion denuder method for the study of vapor-phase nicotine: The effects of experimental configuration and smoke dilution; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 53, 1999, p. 49. Joseph, M.J., E.W. Cochran, R.M. Striegel, and M.A. Sudholt: Statistical methods for the prediction of “tar” and nicotine deliveries at varied smoking machine parameters; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 8, 1997, pp. 27–28. Joyeux, T., J.-M. Loureau, C. Le Moigne, and G. Le Bourvellec: Characterization and influence of the porous structure of cigarette paper on CO deliveries; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 87, 2005, pp. 66–67. Joza, P. and W.S. Rickert: Reduction of artifact formation in the analysis of tobacco specific nitrosamines; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 54, 1999, pp. 49–50. Joza, P., W.S. Rickert, and M.J. Kaiserman: Changes in the TSNA content of Canadian cigarette filler, and mainstream tobacco smoke: 1970–1999; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 12, 2000, pp. 23–24. Joza, P. and W.S. Rickert, and J. Kaiserman; A comparison of yields of “tar”, nicotine and CO from pipe tobacco determined under various smoking conditions;
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1339
11/24/08 2:39:46 PM
1340
1990. 1991. 1992.
1992a.
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996.
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000.
2001.
2002.
2003.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 43, 2001, pp. 45–46. Jullien, J.: Étude sur la nicotine [Study on nicotine]; Thesis, Paris (1868) pp. 1–60. Justin-Müller, E.: Contribution to the study of cigarette and cigar smoke; J. Pharm. Chim. 28 (1935) 430–435. Kaburaki, Y.: A study of the volatile components in tobacco smoke; Ph. D. Thesis, University of Tokyo, Japan (1978). Kaburaki, Y., U. Kobashi, T. Doihara, and S. Sugawara: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. II. Composition of middle- and high- boiling bases in mainstream smoke of cigarettes; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 108 (1966) 205–209. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Kobashi, C. Tokura, T. Okada, Y. Furakawa, and M. Shiga: Relationship of the quantity of tar in the mainstream smoke with varieties of tobacco, smoking conditions, and physical variables of cigarettes; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 187–192. Kaburaki, Y., H. Kusakabe, and H. Shigematsu: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. VI. Gas chromatographic separation of many lower monohydric phenols; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 110 (1968) 113–119. Kaburaki, Y., H. Kusakabe, and H. Shigematsu: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. VII. Composition of the volatile phenol fraction of tobacco smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 110 (1968) 121–125. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Mikami, and H. Kuniyoshi: Total volatile phenols of tobacco smoke and their retention on cigarette filters; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 153–159. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Mikami, and H. Kuniyoshi: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. II. Colorimetric determination of total volatile phenols in cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 181–186. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Mikami, and M. Nakamura: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. XII. Determination of volatile acids in tobacco smoke by temperature programming gas chromatography; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 111 (1969) 151–158. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Mikami, and M. Nakamura: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. XIII. Volatile acids in tobacco smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 111 (1969) 159–168. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Mikami, Y. Okabayashi, and Y. Saida: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. IX. Gaschromatographic determination of lower volatile amines; Bunseki Kagako 18 (1969) 1100–1108. Kaburaki, Y., Y. Mikami, Y. Saida, S. Yoriko, and M. Nakamura: Lower bases of tobacco smoke; J. Agr. Chem. 47 (1973) 799–806. Kaburaki, Y., H. Shigematsu, and H. Kusakabe: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. VIII. Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 110 (1968) 127–133. Kaburaki, Y., H. Shigematsu, and H. Kusakabe: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. X. Relation between vapor phase components and constituents of
2004.
2005.
2006.
2007.
2008.
2009.
2010.
2011. 2012.
2013.
2013a.
2014.
2015.
2016.
2017.
tobacco; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 111 (1969) 135–142. Kaburaki, Y., H. Shigematsu, Y. Mikami, and H. Kusakabe: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. XI. Relation between vapor phase components and constituents of tobacco (2); Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 111 (1969) 143–149. Kaburaki, Y., H. Shigematsu, Y. Yamashita, and H. Kusakabe: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. XV. Volatile compounds from the neutral fraction of tobacco smoke condensate; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 35 (1971) 1741–1750. Kaburaki, Y., S. Sugawara, U. Kobashi, and T. Doihara: Studies on the composition of tobacco smoke. XIV. The formation of pyridines in the pyrolysis of nicotine; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 44 (1970) 224–231. Kaburaki, Y., C. Tokura, Y. Furukawa, and M. Shiga: Research on American and Canadian burley tobacco leaves. III. Components of cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 257–262. Kadar, R. and O. Devik: The possible occurrence of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 117–119. Kagan, M.R., J.A. Cunningham, and D. Hoffmann: Propylene glycol: A precursor of propylene oxide in cigarette smoke; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 41, 1999, p. 42. Kajinama, S., S.H. Wender, and E.C. Smith: Glutamine synthetase from tobacco tissue grown in suspension culture; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 135–137. Kakhiani, Z.H.: Cancerogenic action of tobacco tar; Voprosy Onkol. 1 (1955) 96–100. Kalaitzoglou, M. and C. Samara: Yields of cadmium, tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide in mainstream smoke of Greek cigarettes: A comparative study; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1999) 235–244. Kalaitzoglou, M. and C. Samara: Distribution of PAHs between the particle and gas phase of mainstream cigarette smoke in relation to cigarette technological characteristics; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 331–344. Kalaitzoglou, M. and C. Samara: Gas/particle partitioning and yield levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and n-alkanes in the mainstream cigarette smoke of commercial cigarette brands; Food Chem. Toxicol. 44 (2006) 1432–1442. Kallianos, A.G.: Phenolics and acids in leaf and their relationship to smoking quality and aroma; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 2 (1976) 61–79. Kallianos, A.G. and R.E. Means: Isoprenoid ketones in tobacco; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 13, 1972, pp. 19–20. Kallianos, A.G., R.E. Means, and J.D. Mold: Effect of nitrates in tobacco on the catechol yield in cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 18, 1966, pp. 21–23; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 125–129. Kallianos, A.G., R.E. Means, and J.D. Mold: Alkyl catechols in cigarette smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 21, 1967, p. 12.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1340
11/24/08 2:39:46 PM
Bibliography
2018. Kallianos, A.G., R.E. Means, J.B. Williams, and J.D. Mold: The isolation and identification of stigmasteryl and B-sitosteryl glucosides in cigarette smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 5, 1961, p. 4. 2019. Kallianos, A.G., F.A. Shelburne, R.E. Means, R.K. Stevens, R.E. Lax, and J.D. Mold: Identification of the d-glucosides of stigmasterol, sitosterol, and campesterol in tobacco and cigarette smoke; Biochem. J. 87 (1963) 596–600. 2020. Kamachi, T., H. Yoshitani, H. Nishi, T. Shinkai, and I. Morishita: Menthol cigarettes. I. The stability of menthol; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 147–151. 2021. Kamata, K., N. Motohashi, R. Meyer, and Y. Yamamoto: Analysis of benz[c]acridines in cigarette smoke by highperformance liquid chromatography; J. Liq. Chromatog. 15 (1992) 1907–1920. 2022. Kamenshchikova, S.V. and I.G. Mokhnachev: Formaldehyde in tobacco smoke; Tabak (Moscow) 4 (1973) 38. 2023. Kameswararao, B.V. and N.C. Bopalachari: Polyphenolic constituents of tobacco: A review; Indian J. Appl. Chem. 28 (1965) 163–172. 2024. Kaminski, E.J., J.C. Lazanas, L.L. Wolfson, O.E. Fancher, and J.C. Calandra: Fate of aflatoxins in cigarette tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 189–192. 2024a. Kamiya, A., I. Ikegami, and E. Hase: Effects of light on chlorophyll formation in cultured tobacco cells. II. Blue light effect on 5-aminolevulinic acid formation; Plant Cell Physiol. 24 (1983) 799–809. 2025. Kamstrup, O., C. Hugod, and E. Larsen: Measurements of low concentrations of carbonyl sulfide; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 33–38. 2026. Kanai, Y., O. Wada, and S. Manabe: Detection of carcinogenic glutamic acid pyrolysis products in cigarette smoke condensate; Carcinogenesis 11 (1990) 1001–1003. 2027. Kanamura, K., K. Kato, and M. Noguchi: Isolation and identification of G-l-glutamyl-l-glutamic acid from tobacco cells in suspension culture; Agr. Biol. Chem. 38 (1974) 2285–2286. 2028. Kaneda, T.: Biosynthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons. II. Studies on the biosynthetic pathway in tobacco; Biochemistry 7 (1968) 1194–1202. 2029. Kaneki, K., Y. Masuo, and T. Okada: Determination of particulate matter and carbon oxides in sidestream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 155–162. 2030. Kaneki, K., M. Matsukura, and Y. Ishizu: Role of alkali metals in reduction of carbon monoxide in mainstream smoke; CORESTA 1990 Symp., Kallithea, Greece, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1990: Paper S18, 224. 2031. Kaneko, H.: The aroma of cigar tobacco. Part II. Isolation of norambreinolide from cigar tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 35 (1971) 1461–1462. 2032. Kaneko, H. and M. Harada: 4-Hydroxy-B-damascone and 4-hydroxydihydro-B-damascone from cigar tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 36 (1972) 168–171. 2033. Kaneko, H. and M. Harada: The aroma of cigar tobacco. Part III. Isolation and synthesis of R-(+)-3-isopropyl5-hydroxypentanoic acid; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 36 (1972) 658–662.
1341
2034. Kaneko, H. and K. Ijichi: The aroma of cigar tobacco. Part I. Isolation of 2-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexylidene-1-acetic acid lactone (dihydroactinidiolide) from ether extract of cigar leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 32 (1968) 1337–1340. 2035. VOID 2036. Kann, J., O. Tauts, R. Kalve, and T. Paalme: Determination of nitrogen oxides in smoke; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 9 (1975) 180–182. 2037. Kapetanovic, A. and Z. Slijecevic: Comparative analyses of the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke; Duvan 7 (1957) 159–167. 2037a. Karr, C. Jr: The longest wavelength band in the electronic spectra of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons for analytical use; Appl. Spec. 13 (1959) 15–25. 2037b. Kasai, H., Z.Yamaizumi, T. Shiomi, S. Yokohama, T. Miyazawa, K. Wakabayashi, M. Nagao, T. Sugimura, and S. Nishimura: Structure of a potent mutagen isolated from fried beef; Chem. Lett. 12 (1981) 485–488. 2037c. Kasai, H., Z.Yamaizumi, K. Wakabayashi, M. Nagao, T. Sugimura, S. Yokohama, T. Miyazawa, and S. Nishimura: Structure and chemical synthesis of Me-IQ, a potent mutagen isolated from broiled fish; Chem. Lett. 11 (1980) 1391–1394. 2037d. Kasai, H., Z.Yamaizumi, K. Wakabayashi, M. Nagao, T. Sugimura, S. Yokohama, T. Miyazawa, N.E. Spingarn, H. Weisburger, and S. Nishimura: Potent novel mutagens produced by broiling fish under normal conditions; Proc. Japan Acad. 56B (1980) 278–283. 2038. Kasperbauer, M.J. and A.J. Hiatt: Photoreversible control of leaf shape and chlorophyll content in Nicotiana tabacum L.; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 29–32. 2039. Kataoka H, K. Kijima, and G. Maruo: Determination of mutagenic heterocyclic amines in combustion smoke samples; Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 60 (1998) 60–67. 2040. Kataoka, H., M. Kurisu, and S. Shindoh: Determination of volatile N-nitrosamines in combustion smoke samples; Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 59 (1997) 570–576. 2041. Kataoka, H., S. Shindoh, and M. Makita: Selective determination of volatile N-nitrosamines by derivatization with diethyl chlorothiophosphate and gas chromatography with flame photometric detection; J. Chromatog. Anal. 723 (1996) 93–99. 2041a. Kataoka, H., A. Sumida, and M. Makita: Determination of aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection; Chromatographia 44 (1997) 491–496. 2042. Kato, K.: Pyrolysis of cellulose. Part III. Comparative studies of volatile compounds from pyrolysates of cellulose and its related compounds; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 31 (1967) 657–663. 2042a. Kato, K., F. Watanabe, and S. Eda: Interior chains of glucuronomannan from extracellular polysaccharides of suspension-cultured tobacco cells; Agr. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 539–542. 2043. Kato, K., F. Sakai, and T. Nakahata: Thermal decomposition of tobacco lignin; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 171–175. 2044. Kato, K. and Y. Shibayama: Products of the thermal decomposition of vanillin and their transfer to cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 104 (1962) 115–121.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1341
11/24/08 2:39:47 PM
1342
2045. Kato, K., Y. Shibayama, and T. Nakahata: Some phenols in cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 105 (1963) 209–212. 2046. Kato, K., N. Takahashi, and Y. Kaburaki: Thermal analysis of tobacco constituents: Ash extracts, lignin, holocellulose, and A-cellulose; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 165–169. 2046a. Kato, R., T. Nakadate, S. Yamamoto, and T. Sugimura: Inhibition of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced tumor promotion and ornithinine decarboxylase activity by quercitin: Possible involvement of lipoxygenase inhibition; Carcinogenesis 4 (1983) 1301–1305. 2047. Kato, S., T. Kurata, and M. Fujimaki: Thermal degradation of aromatic amino acids; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 35 (1971) 2106–2122. 2048. Kato, S., T. Kurata, R. Ishitsuka, and M. Fujimaki: Pyrolysis of A-hydroxyamino acids, especially L-serine; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 34 (1970) 1826–1832. 2049. Kato, S., T. Kurata, S. Ishiguro, and M. Fujimaki: Additional volatile compounds produced by pyrolysis of sulfur-containing amino acids; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 37 (1973) 1759–1761. 2050. Katsuya, S., Y. Ishiwata, K. Koga, J. Daimon, S. Tsuchiya, and H. Saito: Influence of humidity during air-curing on TSNA accumulation in burley tobacco; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 54, 2002, pp. 52–53. 2051. Katsuya, S., Y. Ishiwata, and C. Narimatsu: Formation of tobacco-specific nitrosamine and population of nitratereducing bacteria during the curing stage of burley tobacco; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper No. AP2. 2052. Katsuya, S., Y. Ishiwata, S. Tsuchiya, and H. Saito: Suppression of TSNA formation during air-curing by humidity control; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 29, 2004, p. 38. 2053. Katz, T., R.N. Ferguson, R.D. Kinser, W.N. Einoff, and T.P. Pitner: Isolation and identification of two new seco-cembranoids from cigarette smoke; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 36, 1981, p. 19; Katz, T., T.P. Pitner, R.D. Kinser, R.N. Ferguson,and W.N. Einoff:. Isolation and identification of two new secocembranoids from cigarette smoke; Tetrahedron Lett. 22 (1981) 4771–4774. 2054. Katz, T., R.D. Kinser, W.N. Einoff, and R. Bassfield: Thermolysis of duvatriene-1,3-diols; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 37, 1982, p. 20. 2055. Kaufman, D.W., S.P. Helmrich, L. Rosenberg, O.S. Miettinen, and S. Shapira: Nicotine and carbon monoxide content of cigarette smoke and the risk of myocardial infarction in young men; New Eng. J. Med. 308 (1983) 409–413. 2056. Kaul, L. and R.L. Lester: Characterization of inositolcontaining phosphosphingolipids from tobacco leaves: Isolation and identification of two novel, major lipids: N-Acetylglucosamidoglucuronido-inositol phosphorylceramide and glucosamidoglucuronidoinositol phosphorylceramide; Plant Physiol. 55 (1975) 120–129; Isolation of six novel phosphoinositol-containing
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2056a.
2056b.
2057.
2057a.
2058.
2058a.
2058b. 2059.
2060.
2061.
2062.
2063.
2064.
sphingolipids from tobacco leaves; Biochemistry 17 (1978) 3569–3575. Kaur, N., A. Morin, K. Waldron, and A. Furtos: Fractionation, chemical characterization and biotoxicity of the tobacco combustion products of chlorogenic acid; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 14, 2006, p. 24. Kavi Kishor, P.B., S. Sangam, R.N. Amrutha, P. Sri Laxmi, K.R. Naidu, K.R.S.S. Rao, S. Rao, K.J. Reddy, P. Theriappan, and N. Sreenivasulu: Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance; Current Science 88 (2005) 424–438. Kavouras, I.G., N. Stratigakis, and E.G. Stephanou: Iso- and anteisoalkanes: Specific tracers of environmental tobacco smoke in indoor and outdoor particle-size distributed urban aerosols; Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998) 1369–1377. Kawabata, T., M. Matsui, T. Ishibashi, and M. Nakamura M: Analysis of N-nitrosamines by gas chromatography; Japan Analyst 21 (1972) 1326–1332. Kawabata, T., J. Uibu, H. Ohshima, M. Matsui, M. Hamano, and H. Tokiwa: Occurrence, formation and precursors of N-nitroso compounds in the Japanese diet; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence and biological effects, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 31 (1980) 481–492. Keeney, J.P. and T.J. Johnson: Method for determination of 15 organophosphorus pesticide residues in tobacco; ACD, 1995, No. 010, March 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 523030090 -0102. Kefford, N.P. and K. Helms: Indoleacetic acid in two species of Nicotiana; Nature 179 (1956) 679. Keith, C.H.: Measurement of the total smoke issuing from a burning cigarette; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 18, 1964, pp. 29–31; Keith, C.H.: and P.G. Tesh: Measurement of the total smoke issuing from a burning cigarette; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 61–64. Keith, C.H.: Application of gas chromatography to tobacco smoke analysis; Theory Appl. Gas Chromat. (1968) 243–251. Keith, C.H.: Filtration as a means of reduction of tar and nicotine levels in tobacco smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 49–55. Keith, C.H.: Physical methods for the modification of tobacco smoke; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 225–237. Keith, C.H. and J.R. Misenheimer: Vapor filtration by fibrous cigarette filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 583–589; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 886–894. Keith, C.H. and J.R. Newsome: An automatic smoking machine for the quantitative determination of the differences between cigarettes; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 15, 1956, p. 11; Quantitative studies on cigarette smoke. I. An automatic smoking machine; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 51–57.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1342
11/24/08 2:39:47 PM
Bibliography
2065. Keith, C.H. and J.R. Newsome: Quantitative studies on cigarette smoke. III. Methods of analyses for filter cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 14–19. 2066. Keith, C.H. and J.R. Newsome: Variation of the gas phase composition within a burning cigarette; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 20, 1961, p. 9. 2067. Keith, C.H., V. Norman, and W.W. Bates: Matière filtrante, notamment pour la fumëe du Tabac [Filtration material, particularly for tobacco smoke]; Belgian Patent No. 640,746 (May 1964). 2068. Keith, C.H. and P.G. Tesh: Measurement of the total smoke issuing from a burning cigarette; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 61–64. 2068a. Keller, H., N. Pamboukdjian, M. Ponchet, A. Poupet, R. Delon, J.-L. Verrier, D. Roby, and P. Ricci: Pathogeninduced elicitin production in transgenic tobacco generates a hypersensitive response and nonspecific disease resistance; Plant Cell 11 (1999) 223–235. 2069. Kelley, T.F.: Polonium-210 content of mainstream cigarette smoke; Science 149 (1965) 537–538. 2070. Kellogg, D.S.: The evolution of low molecular weight aldehydes from tobacco and tobacco carbohydrates; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 71, 2002, pp. 63–64. 2071. Kellogg, D.S., B.E. Waymack, and M.R. Hajaligol: Aromatic hydrocarbon formation from tobacco pyrolysis; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 31, 2000, p. 36. 2072. Kellogg, D.S., B.E. Waymack, and M.R. Hajaligol: Characterization of aromatic hydrocarbons from the gas-phase and solid-phase pyrolysis of tobacco; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 21, 2001, pp. 32–33. 2072a. Kelly, A.J., M.B. Bonnlander, and D.R. Meeks-Wagner: NFL, the tobacco homolog of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems; Plant Cell 7 (1995) 225–234. 2073. Kennaway, E.L.: The formation of cancer-producing substances from isoprene; J. Path. Bacteriol. 27 (1924) 233–238. 2074. Kennaway, E.L.: Cancer-producing tars and tar fractions; J. Ind. Hyg. 5 (1924) 462–488. 2075. Kennaway, E.L.: Experiments on cancer-producing substances; Brit. Med. J. 1925(ii) 1–4. 2076. Kennaway, E.L.: Further experiments on cancer-producing substances; Biochem. J. 24 (1930) 497–504. 2077. Kennaway, E.L.: The identification of a carcinogenic compound in coal-tar; Brit. Med. J. 1955 (ii) 749–752. 2078. Kennaway, E.L. and I. Hieger: Carcinogenic substances and their fluorescent spectra; Brit. Med. J. 1930(i) 1044–1046. 2079. Kennaway, E.L. and A.J. Lindsey: Some possible exogenous factors in the causation of lung cancer; Brit. Med. Bull. 14 (1958) 124–131. 2080. Kennaway, E.L. and B. Sampson: Tumours of skin and mammary gland caused by pyrogenous products of cholesterol; J. Path. Bacteriol. 31 (1928) 609–612. 2081. Kensler, C.J.: The pharmacology of tobacco smoke: Effects of chronic exposure; in: Tobacco and health, edited by G. James and T. Rosenthal, C. C. Thomas, Springfield, MA (1962) pp. 5–20.
1343
2082. Kensler, C.J.: Technological aspects as to our ability toward, and consumer acceptance of, reducing phenolic compounds in cigarette smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 15. 2083. Kensler, C.J. and S.P. Battista: Factors effecting mammalian ciliary activity; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 4(1) (1963) 33. 2084. Kensler, C.J. and S.P. Battista: Components of cigarette smoke with ciliary-depressant activity: Their selective removal by filters containing activated charcoal; New Eng. J. Med. 269 (1963) 1161–1166. 2085. Kensler, C.J. and S.P. Battista: Inhibition of mammalian ciliary transport activity by gases and aerosols with special reference to duration of action; Fed. Proc. 23(2, Pt.I) (1964) 105. 2086. Kensler, C.J. and S.P. Battista: Chemical and physical factors affecting mammalian ciliary activity; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 93 (1966) 93–102. 2086a. Keritsis, G.D. and D.A. Lowitz: Method for employing tobacco dust in a paper-making type preparation of reconstituted tobacco and the smoking material produced thereby; U.S. Patent No. 4,341,228 (July 7, 1982). 2086b. Kerns, W.D., K.L. Pavkov, D.J. Donofrio, E.J. Gralla, and J.A. Swenberg: Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in rats and mice after long-term inhalation exposure; Cancer Res. 43 (1983) 4382–4392. 2086c. Ketkar, M.B., J. Holste, R. Preussmann, and J. Althoff: Carcinogenic effect of nitrosomorpholine administered in the drinking water to Syrian golden hamsters; Cancer Lett. 17 (1983) 333–338. 2086d. Ketkar, M.B., P. Schneider, R. Preussmann, C. Plass, and U. Mohr: Carcinogenic effect of low doses of nitrosopyrrolidine administered in drinking water in Syrian golden hamsters; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 104 (1982) 775–79. 2087. Khanolkar, V., T.B. Panse, and V.D. Divekar: G-Sitosteryl glycoside in tobacco; Science 122 (1955) 515–516. 2088. Kiefer, J.E.: Removal of vaporized compounds from a gas stream by fibrous filters; Seminar, Tennessee Eastman Personnel to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D Personnel, Winston-Salem, NC (1965). 2089. Kiefer, J.E. and R.E. Leonard: A new method for quantitatively determining formaldehyde and other carbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke; Seminar, Tennessee Eastman Personnel to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D Personnel, Winston-Salem, NC, 1964, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501013036 -3054. 2089a. Kiefer, J.E. and R.C. Mumpower II: Parameters that affect the pressure drop and efficiency of cellulose acetate cigarette filters; Seminar, Tennessee Eastman Personnel to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D Personnel, Winston-Salem, NC, September 14 (1967). 2090. Kiefer, J.E. and G.P. Touey: Process for producing tobacco smoke filter elements from cellulose ester filaments containing polyethylene glycol; U.S. Patent No. 3,227,791 (January 4, 1966). 2090a. Kiefer, J.E. and C.H. Weatherly: Methanethiol - another difference between smoke gases from nitrate-treated and control cigarettes; Seminar, Tennessee Eastman Personnel to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1343
11/24/08 2:39:47 PM
1344
2090b.
2091. 2091a.
2092.
2093.
2094.
2095.
2095a.
2095b.
2096.
2097.
2098.
2099.
2099a.
2099b.
2100.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Personnel, Winston-Salem, NC, September 14, 1967, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501013024 -3035. Kierulff, J.V., O.B. Jorgensen, T.T. Hansen, A.J. Knox, and Y. De Grandpré: Use of a phenol oxidizing enzyme in the treatment of tobacco; U.S. Patent No. 6,298,859 (October 9, 2001). Kilburn, K.D.: Improvement relating to tobacco smoke filters; British Patent No. 923,570 (July 31, 1963). Kim, S.G. and R.F. Novak: Role of P450IIE1 in the metabolism of 3-hydroxypyridine, a constituent of tobacco smoke: Redox cycling and DNA strand scission by the metabolite 2.5-dihydroxypyridine; Cancer Res. 50 (1990) 5333–5339. Kimland, B., A.J. Aasen, S.O. Almqvist, O. Arpino, and C.R. Enzell: Volatile acids of sun-cured Greek Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 12 (1973) 835–847. Kimland, B., A.J. Aasen, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 10. Volatile neutral constituents of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B26 (1972) 2177–2184. Kimland, B., A.J. Aasen, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 12. Neutral volatile constituents of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B26 (1972) 1281–1284. Kimland, B., R.S. Appleton, A.J. Aasen, J. Roeraade, and C.R. Enzell: Neutral oxygen-containing constituents of Greek tobacco; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 309–316. Kinae, N., C. Mori, K. Kujirai, S. Masumori, and S. Masuda: Formation of mutagenic/carcinogenic heterocyclic amines under moderate conditions; in: The Maillard reaction. Chemistry at the interface of nutrition, aging, and disease, edited by J.W. Baynes, V.M. Monnier, J.M. Ames, and S.R. Thorpe, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1043 (2005) 80–84. Kinase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term kinase phosphorylating pyruvate tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: Murchie, E.H., S. Ferrario-Méry, M.-H. Valadier, and C.H. Foyer: Short-term nitrogen-induced modulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in tobacco and maize leaves; J. Exptl. Botany, 51 (2000) 1349–1356. Search for other kinases provides similar references. Kinlen, L.J. and E. Rogot: Leukemia and smoking habits among United States veterans; Brit. Med. J. 297 (1988) 657–659. Kinser, R., F. Hsu, D. Farthing, L. Johnson, and C. Ellis: Nicotine collection efficiency in the FTC nicotine method; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 46, 1999, p. 48. Kinzer, G.W., T.F. Page Jr, and R.R. Johnson: Structure of two solanone precursors from tobacco; J. Org. Chem. 31 (1966) 1797–1800. Kiryu, S. and M.P. Kuratsune: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the cigarette tar produced by human smoking; Gann 57 (1966) 317–323. Kisaki, T. and E. Tamaki: Phytochemical studies on the tobacco alkaloids. III. Observations on the interconversion of DL-nicotine and DL-nornicotine in excised tobacco leaves;Arch Biochem. Biophys. 94 (1961) 252–256. Kisaki, T. and N.E. Tolbert: Glycine as a substrate for photorespiration; Plant Cell Physiol. 11 (1970) 247–258. Kissling, R.: Betrachtungen über den Nikotingehalt des Cigarrenrauchs gemeinsam mit anderen giftigen Verbrennungsprodukten des Tabaks [The nicotine
2101. 2102.
2103.
2104.
2105. 2106.
2107.
2108.
2109.
2110.
2111.
2111a. 2111b.
2112.
2113.
2113a.
content of cigar smoke considered simultaneously with other poisonous combustion products of tobacco]; Dingler’s Polytech. J. 244 (1882) 64-71; Betrachtungen über den Nikotingehalt des Cigarrenrauchs gemeinsam mit der toxischen Wirkung der Verbrennungsprodukten des Tabaks [The nicotine content of cigar smoke and the simultaneous consideration of the toxic action of the combustion products of tobacco]; Dingler’s Polytech. J. 244 (1882) 234–246. Kissling, R.: Tobacco fat; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 16 (1883) 2432–2434. Kissling, R.: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Tabakrauchs [Contribution to the knowledge of tobacco smoke]; Arch. Hyg. 20 (1894) 211–213. Kissling, R.: Nachweis von Nikotin im Tabakrauch [Evidence of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 22 (1898) 805. Kissling, R.: Handbuch der Tabakkunds, des Tabakbaues, und der Tabakfabrikation [Handbook of tobacco information, tobacco types, and tobacco manufacture]; Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany (1905). Kissling, R.: Fortschritte der Tabakchemie [Progress in tobacco chemistry]; Chem. Ztg. 32 (1908) 717–718. Kissling, R.: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Tabakchemie [Progress in the field of tobacco chemistry]; Chem. Ztg. 34 (1910) 486–488. Kissling, R.: Handbuch der Tabakkundse [Handbook of tobacco information]; 3rd Edition; Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany (1919) 397. Kissling, R.: Tabak; in: Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden [Handbook of biological procedures], edited by E. Abderhalden, Section IV, Part 8, 2nd Half (1923) 1289–1302. Kissling, R.: Handbuch der Tabakkunde, des Tabakbaues und der Tabakfabrikation [Handbook of tobacco information, tobacco types, and tobacco manufacture]; 5th Edition, Berlin, Germany (1925) pp. 84–87, 114–117. Kissling, R.: Über die Entfernung des Nikotins aus dem Tabakrauch während des Rauchens [Removal of nicotine from tobacco smoke during smoking]; Chem. Ztg. 56 (1932) 31. Kissling, R.: Über die Entnikotinisierung des Tabakrauchs während des Rauchens [Denicotinization of tobacco smoke during smoking]; Chem. Ztg. 56 (1932) 822–823. Kitamura, K.: Pyrolysis of triglycerides; Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 44 (1971) 1606–1609. Kitchens, J.F., R.E. Casner, G.S. Edwards, W.E. Harward III, and B.J. Macri: Investigation of selected potential environmental contaminants: Formaldehyde; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Toxic Substances, Washington, DC EPA-56012-76-009 (1976). Klein, M.: Introduction of skin tumors in the mouse with minute doses of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene alone or with croton oil; Cancer Res. 16 (1956) 123–127. Klemm, L.H., D. Reed, L.A. Miller, and B.T. Ho: Chemical structure and chromatographic adsorbability of aromatic hydrocarbons on alumina; J. Org. Chem. 24 (1959) 1468–1477. Klessig, D.F. and S. Zhang: Salicylic acid induced map kinase and its use for enhanced disease resistance in plants; U.S. Patent No. 5,977,442 (November 2, 1999).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1344
11/24/08 2:39:47 PM
Bibliography
2114. Klimisch, H.-J.: A new chromatographic method for preparative fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate for biological experiments; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 29, 1971, p. 17. 2115. Klimisch, H.-J.: Clean-up and separation methods for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate; Z. Anal. Chem. 264 (1973) 275–278. 2116. Klimisch, H.-J.: Separation analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by high pressure liquid chromatography. Selective separation system for the quantitative estimation of isomeric benzpyrenes and coronene; J. Chromatog. 83 (1973) 11–14. 2117. Klimisch, H.-J.: Quantitative determination of CO and CO2 in cigarette smoke and smoke-filled inhalation chambers; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 21, 1973, p. 13. 2118. Klimisch, H.-J.: Quantitative determination of volatile nitrosamines in cigarette smoke condensate; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 37, 1975, p. 27 [Presentation cancelled during Conference]. 2119. Klimisch, H.-J. and D. Ambrosius: Quantitative determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke condensates by high pressure liquid chromatography; Z. Anal. Chem. 280 (1976) 377–379. 2120. Klimisch, H.-J. and S. Beiss: Separation of N-heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Separation by ion-exchange chromatography and fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate; J. Chromatog. 128 (1976) 117–124. 2121. Klimisch, H.-J. and E. Kirchheim: A rapid method for the determination of benzo[a]pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, and chrysene in cigarette smoke; Chromatographia 9 (1976) 119–122. 2122. Klimisch, H.-J. and E. Kirchheim: Zur Quantitativen Bestimmung von Stickstoffoxyden in Zigarettenrauch mit Hilfe der Chemilumineszenzmethode [On the quantitative determination of nitrogen oxides in cigarette smoke with help from the chemiluminescence method]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 163 (1977) 48–52. 2123. Klimisch, H.-J. and K. Meissner: Gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Kohlenmonoxid in Cigarettenrauch. Vergleich zweier Abrauch- und Gasspeicherverfarhren [Gas chromatographic determination of carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke. Comparison of two different smoking and trapping procedures]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 216–219. 2124. Klimisch, H.-J., K. Meissner: and H. Wernicke: Gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Kohlenmonoxid und Kohlendioxide. Untersuchungen an der Gasphase des Zigarettenrauches [Gas chromatographic determination of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. Examination of the gas phase of cigarette smoke]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 157 (1975) 339–343. 2125. Klimisch, H.-J. and D. Reese: Gel chromatographic separation of hydrocarbons, amines and phenols on a polystyrene gel column. Preparative fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate for biological experiments; J. Chromatog. 67 (1972) 299–307. 2126. Klimisch, H.-J. and D. Reese: Column chromatographic separation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Chromatog. 80 (1973) 266–270.
1345
2127. Klimisch, H.-J. and L. Stadler: Gel distribution chromatographic procedure for the preparative separation of polar substances from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Chromatog. 67 (1972) 175–178. 2128. Klimisch, H.-J. and L. Stadler: Untersuchungen zur Bildung von N’-Nitrosonornikotin aus Nikotin-N’Oxide [Study on the formation of N’-nitrosonornicotine from nicotine-N’-oxide]; Talanta 23 (1976) 614–616. 2129. Klimisch, H.-J., L. Stadler, and S. Brahm: Quantitative Bestimmung flüchtiger Nitrosamine in Zigarettenrauchkondensaten [Quantitative determination of volatile nitrosamines in cigarette smoke condensate]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 162 (1976) 131–138. 2130. Klimisch, H.-J. and W. Szonn: Diskussion einer Kennzahl für polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe. Vergleich von Messungen der Fluoreszenz-Emissionsund Fluoreszenz-Anregungs-Spektren einiger Cigarettenrauchkondensate-Fraktionen zur biologischen Aktivität der Cigarettenrauch-kondensate [Discussion on the characteristic value for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Comparison from measurements of fluorescence emission and fluorescence absorption spectra of several cigarette smoke condensate fractions to the biological activity of the cigarette smoke condensate]; Z. Anal. Chem. 265 (1972) 7–12. 2131. Klimisch, H.-J., H. Wernicke, and K. Meissner: Gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Isopren, Acetaldehyd und Acrolein aus der Gasphase von Cigarettenrauch [Gas chromatographic determination of isoprene, acetaldehyde, and acrolein in the gas phase of cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 350–353. 2131a. Klotz, K.L. and L.M. Lagrimini: Phytohormone control of the tobacco anionic peroxidase promoter; Plant. Mol. Biol. 31 (1996) 565–573. 2132. Klus, H.: Quinolines and related compounds in tobacco smoke and in the environment; Manuscript from Austria Tabakwerke (1979) 1–5. 2133. Klus, H.: Distribution of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke components; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 16 (1990) 189–232. 2134. Klus, H., G. Bachlechner, and E.R. Schmid: Characterization and identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate by GC-MS in combination with retention indices; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: Paper S03, 91; Proc. CORESTA Symp., Taormina, Italy, 1986: Paper S03, 407–408. 2134a. Klus, H., H. Begutter, A. Nowak, G. Pinterits, I. Ultsch, and H. Wihlidal: Indoor air pollution due to tobacco smoke under real conditions. Preliminary results; Tokai J. Exp. Clin. Med. 10 (1985) 531–540. 2135. Klus, H., H. Begutter, and I. Ultsch: Analytik flüchtiger Nitrosamine im Nebenstrom von Zigaretten [Analysis of volatile nitrosamines in sidestream smoke from cigarettes]. Unpublished 1981 data cited in Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Verteilung verschiedener Tabakrauchbestandteile auf Haupt- und Nebenstromrauch (Eine Übersicht) [Distribution of different tobacco smoke components between main- and sidestream smoke (An overview)]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 229–265, see p. 252. 2136. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Die Bestimmung des Nornikotinnitrosamins im Rauchkondensat Nornikotinreicher Zigaretten [Estimation of the nitrosonornicotine in the smoke condensate from nornicotine-rich
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1345
11/24/08 2:39:47 PM
1346
2137.
2138.
2139.
2140.
2141.
2142.
2142a.
2143.
2144.
2145.
2146.
2147.
2148.
2149.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
cigarettes]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 14 (1973) 251–257. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Die Bestimmung von Nitrophenolen in Tabakrauchkondensat [Determination of nitrophenols in tobacco smoke condensate]; Preliminary results; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 15 (1974) 275–288. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Untersuchungen über die nichtflüchtigen N-Nitrosamine der Tabakalkaloide [Study on the nonvolatile N-nitroamines from tobacco alkaloids]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 16 (1975) 307–317. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Reaktionschromatographischer Nachweis einiger N-Nitrosamine der Tabakalkaloide [Chromatographic capability for the detection of several N-nitrosamines from tobacco alkaloids]; J. Chromatog. 109 (1975) 425–426. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Investigations on the weakly acidic and weakly basic N-containing polycyclic compounds in tobacco smoke condensate; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 179. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der schwach basischen und schwach sauren polycyclischen aromatischen Kohlenwasserstoffe im Tabakrauch [Contribution to knowledge of weak basic and weak acidic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 17 (1977) 348–368. Klus, H. and H. Kuhn: Verteilung verschiedener Tabakrauchbestandteile auf Haupt- und Nebenstromrauch (Eine Übersicht) [Distribution of various tobacco smoke components in mainstream and sidestream smoke (A survey)]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 229–265. Knoop, J.L. and C.J. Rosene: Automated analysis of cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 19, 1964, p. 31. Kobashi, Y., T. Doihara, S. Sugawara, and Y. Kaburaki: Studies on flavoring effect. III. Determination of menthol delivered to the smoke of mentholated cigarettes; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 123–127. Kobashi, Y., T. Doihara, S. Sugawara, and Y. Kaburaki: Changes in chemical composition of smoke from cigarettes treated with several polyols; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 319–323. Kobashi, Y. and S. Sakaguchi: Free sugars in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 161–163; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 102 (1960) 16–19. Kobashi, Y. and S. Sakaguchi: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. IV. Combustion temperatures of U.S. blended cigarettes and nicotine transfer into cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 102 (1960) 10–12. Kobashi, Y. and S. Sakaguchi: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. V. Transfer of nicotine into smoke from cigarettes with nicotine added; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 102 (1960) 13–15. Kobashi, Y. and S. Sakaguchi: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. VI. Combustion temperatures of cigars and transfer of nicotine into cigar smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 103 (1961) 5–8. Kobashi, Y. and S. Sakaguchi: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. VII. The influence
2150.
2151.
2152.
2153.
2153a.
2153b.
2154.
2154a.
2155.
2156.
2157.
2158.
of inorganic salts on the combustion of cigarettes and on the transfer of nicotine into the smoke; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 25 (1961) 200–205. Kobashi, Y., S. Sakaguchi, and M. Izawa: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. I. Influence of smoking procedures on combustion temperatures of cigarettes and on the nicotine content of cigarette smoke; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 23 (1959) 528–532. Kobashi, Y., S. Sakaguchi, and M. Izawa: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. II. Influence of moisture content in cigarettes on combustion temperatures and transferred amount of nicotine into cigarette smoke; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 23 (1959) 532–535. Kobashi, Y., S. Sakaguchi, and M. Izawa: Studies on the thermal decomposition of tobacco alkaloids. III. Combustion temperatures of some unblended cigarettes and the transfer of nicotine into cigarette smoke; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 24 (1960) 274–277. Kobashi, Y., S. Sakaguchi, and M. Izawa: Influence of moisture content of cigarettes on combustion temperature and amount of nicotine transferred into cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 102 (1960) 6–9. Kobel, M. and C. Neuberg: Über das Vorkommen von Saponin im Tabak und einer Begleichsubstanz [Presence of saponin in tobacco and an accompanying substance]; J. Prakt. Chem. 143 (1935) 20–41. Kobel, M. and M. Scheuer: Der Kohlehydratmetabolismus in grünen Tabakblättern. Nachweis von Methylglyoxal als ein Zwischenprodukt des Metabolismus grüner Blätter [The carbohydrate metabolism of the tobacco leaf. Demonstration of methylglyoxal as an intermediate product in the metabolism of green leaves]; Biochem. Z. 216 (1929) 216–223. Koenig, P.: Chemical and physical differences between strong and mild tobaccos; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 70 (1935) 26–33. Koga, K., Y. Ishiwata, J. Daimon, and H. Saito: Change of TSNA and nitrite in tobacco powder during storage; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 28, 2005, pp. 33–34. Koiwai, A., Y. Mikami, H. Matsushita, and T. Kisoki: Isolation of 1-nornicotino-1-deoxy-B-d-fructofuranose and its formation during the process of flue-curing of tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 1421–1426. Koiwai, A., K. Nishida, M. Noguchji, and K. Arima: Studies on the fermentation of tobacco. Part II. A study of variations in fermentation procedure and its effect on total particulate matter and benzo(a)pyrene; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 108–110. Koji, T., M. Risa, F. Masahiro, and T. Hideki: A pyrolysis study on hydrogen cyanide formation in tobacco smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 76, 2002, pp. 66–67. Kolb, W.: Vorversuche zur Bestimmung des Gehaltes von Polonium-210 in Rauchkondensat und Zigaretten [Preliminary experiments on the estimation of the content of polonium-210 in smoke condensate and cigarettes]; Bundesrepublick Deutsch. (January 22, 1965) pp. 1–3; Experimental method and results on the determination of polonium-210 in various tobaccos and in cigarette smoke condensate; Bundesrepublick Deutsch. (September 23, 1965) pp. 1–7.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1346
11/24/08 2:39:48 PM
Bibliography
2159. Koller, K.B., C.E. Thomas, M.E. Parrish, and D.E. Leyden: Puff-by-puff determination of gas phase acetaldehyde, HCN, NO, and CO using FTIR spectrometry; CORESTA 1990 Symp., Kallithea, Greece, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1990: Paper S06, 210. 2160. Kon, T., H. Harada, K. Ito, R. Yamazoe, and T. Totoni: Residual levels of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides in cigarets and their smoke; Tokyo Toritsu Eisei Kenkyusho Kenkyu Nempo 22 (1970) 167–176. 2161. Koperina, A.W.: Untersuchung der Stickstoffhältigen Verbindungen des Tabakrauches [Investigation of nitrogenous compounds in tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 219 (1930) 258–276. 2162. Koperina, A.W.: An investigation of the nitrogenous substances of tobacco smoke; in: Research on the chemistry of tobacco, edited by A.A. Shmuk, Gosudartsvennyi Inst. Tabakovedeniya Publ. No. 80 (1931) 61–75. 2163. Koperina, A.W.: Research on tobacco chemistry. VII. The resins of tobacco smoke; Biochem. Z. 256 (1932) 134–144. 2164. Koperina, A.W.: The balance of nicotine in the smoking of tobacco in cigarettes; Tabakhnaya Promysh. 1934(5) 37–40. 2165. Koperina, A.W.: The resins of tobacco smoke; Vsesoy. Inst. Tabakhnoi Makharoch. Promysh. Publ. No. 109 (1934) 99–106. 2166. Koperina, A.W. and S. Kalibab: Denicotinized cigarettes; Tabakhnaya Promysh. 1935(3) 34–35. 2167. Koperina, A.W. and A. Shageeva: Transfer of nicotine into the smoke for different conditions of burning Makhorka and Makhorka dust; Tabakhnaya Promysh. 1934(1) 15–19. 2168. Koppang, N., A. Rivenson, A. Reith, H. Dahle, O. Evenson, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XLVIII. Carcinogenicity of N’-nitrosonornicotine in mink (Mustela vison); Carcinogenesis 13 (1992) 1957–1960. 2169. Koppang, N., A. Rivenson, H.K. Dahle, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. LIII. Carcinogenicity of N’-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in mink (Mustela vison); Cancer Lett. 111 (1997) 167–171. 2169a. Korswagen, H.C., M.T. Smits, R.M. Durbin, and H.A. Plasterk: Shotgun sequence analysis of transposon Tc1 alleles in high copy number strains; Worm Breeder’s Gazette 13 (1995) 90. 2170. Kosak, A.I.: The composition of tobacco smoke; Experientia 10 (1954) 69–71. 2171. Kosak, A.I.: Chemistry of tobacco smoke; Chapter I in: Biologic effects of tobacco, edited by E.L. Wynder, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA (1955). 2172. Kosak, A.I.: The chemistry of cigarette smoke and its relation to lung cancer; Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 18 (Series 2) (1956) 585–591. 2173. Kosak, A.I. and P.D. Rosen: Components of cigarette smoke; 7th Internat. Cancer Cong., London, England (1958). 2174. Kosak, A.I., P.D. Rosen, and J.S. Swinehart: Components of cigarette smoke; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 612–663. 2175. Kosak, A.I. and J.S. Swinehart: The presence of squalene in cigarette smoke; Chem. & Ind. (London) (1958) 1007. 2176. Kosak, A.I. and J.S. Swinehart: Some neutral components of cigarette smoke; J. Org. Chem. 25 (1960) 222–225, see Table II, p. 223.
1347
2177. Kosak, A.I., J.S. Swinehart, and D. Taber: The components of cigarette smoke. I. Preliminary studies; J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 17 (1956) 375–390. 2178. Kosak, A.I., J.S. Swinehart, D. Taber, and B.L. Van Duuren: Stigmasterol in cigarette smoke; Science 125 (1957) 991–992. 2178a. Kosuge, T., K. Tsugi, K. Wakabayashi, T. Okamoto, K. Shudo, Y. Iitaka, A. Itai, T. Sugimura, T. Kawachi, M. Nagao, T. Yahagi, and Y. Seino: Isolation and structure studies of mutagenic principles in amino acid pyrolysates; Chem. Pharm. Bull. 26 (1978) 611–619. 2178b. Kosugi, A., M. Nagao, Y. Suwa, K. Wakabayashi, and T. Sugimura: Roasting coffee beans produces compounds that induce Prophage l in E. coli and are mutagens in E. coli and S. typhimurium; Mutation Res. 116 (1983) 179–184. 2179. Kotin, P. and H.L. Falk: The role and action of environmental agents in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. II. Cigarette smoke; Cancer 13 (1960) 250–262. 2180. Kotin, P. and H.L. Falk: Personal communication to A. Elliott and D.M. Pace, cited in Elliott, A. and D.M. Pace: Observations on the effects of methanol and formaldehyde on established cell lines cultivate in vitro; Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 41 (1963) 299–304. 2181. Kovalenko, E.: The nicotine content of tobacco smoke; in: Research on the chemistry of tobacco, edited by A.A. Schmuk, Gosudarstvennyi Inst. Tabakovedeniya Publ. No. 80 (1931) 77–85. 2182. Krainev, S.I.: Variations and properties of smoke in the fermentation of tobacco; Zhur. Priklad. Khim. 11 (1938) 515–522. 2183. Krause, O.: Kohlenmonoxid im Tabakrauch [Carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke]; Dingler’s Polytech. J. 213 (1874) 495–497. 2184. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Farbstoffe zur Farbmattierung von Tabakwaren [Results of smoldering studies on dyes from coloring materials in tobacco products]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 6 (1963) 38–40. 2185. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Farbstoffe zur Farbmattierung von Tabakwaren. 2. (Kreuzbeerenextrakt) [Results of smoldering studies on dyes from coloring materials in tobacco products.2. Kreuz beer extract]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 6 (1963) 317–318. 2186. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Farbstoffe zur Farbmattierung von Tabakwaren. 3. (Blauholzextrakt) [Results of smoldering studies on dyes from coloring materials in tobacco products. 3. Logwood extract]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 6 (1963) 332–335. 2187. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Farbstoffe zur Farbmattierung von Tabakwaren. 4. (Huminsäure) [Results of smoldering studies on dyes from coloring materials in tobacco products. 4. Humic acid]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 6 (1963) 348–349. 2188. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zum Nachweis von Zusatzstoffen in Tabakwaren [A contribution to the detection of additives in tobacco products]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 59 (1963) 317–320. 2189. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zur Beurteilung von TabakFeuchthaltemitteln auf Grund ihrer Pyrolyseprodukte [A contribution to the evaluation of tobacco humectants on the basis of their pyrolysis products]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 7 (1964) 149–152.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1347
11/24/08 2:39:48 PM
1348
2190. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zur Beurteilung von Tabakzusatzstoffe auf Grunf ihrer Pyrolyseprodukte [A contribution to the evaluation of tobacco additives on the basis of their pyrolysis products]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 7 (1964) 375–378. 2191. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse vergleichender Schwel- und Rauchversuche an Tabak [Comparative results of smoldering and smoking studies on tobacco]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 60 (1964) 214–215. 2192. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Zusatzstoffen zu Tabakwaren. 1. Mitteilung. (Glykole) [Results of smoldering experiments with tobacco additives. 1. (Glycols)]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 60 (1964) 235–239. 2193. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zum Nachweis von Zusatzstoffen in Tabakwaren. II. Chromatische Bestimmung von Triäthylenglykol und Polyäthylenglykol [A contribution to the detection of additives in tobacco products. II. Chromatographic detection of triethylene glycol and polyethylene glycol]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 60 (1964) 321. 2194. Kröller, E.: Zur Untersuchung der Schwelprodukte von Tabakzusatzstoffen [Investigation of the smoldering products of tobacco additives]; Lebensm. Chem. Gerichtl. Chem. 61 (1965) 234–237. 2195. Kröller, E.: Die Untersuchung der Pyrolyseprodukte von Tabak-Zusatzstoffen als Grundlage ihrer gesundheitlichen Beurteilung [Study of the pyrolysis products of tobacco additives as basis for their health appraisal]; Z. Anal. Chem. 212 (1965) 46–53. 2196. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Zusatzstoffen zu Tabakwaren. 2. Mitteilung. (Polyglykole, Glycerin) [Results of smoldering experiments with tobacco additives. 2. Polyglycols, glycerol]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 61 (1965) 16–17. 2197. Kröller, E.: Die Untersuchungen der Pyrolyseprodukte von Tabak-Zusatzstoffen als Grundlage ihrer gesundheitlichen Beurteilung [Study of the pyrolysis products of tobacco additives as basis for their health appraisal]; Lebensm. Chem. Gericht. Chem. (1965) 209–210. 2198. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Zusatzstoffen zu Tabakwaren. 3. Mitteilung. (flanzlische Schleim- und Gummiarten) [Results of smoldering experiments with tobacco additives. 3. Plant mucus and gums]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 61 (1965) 150–155. 2199. Kröller, E.: The fluorimetric determination of 3,4-benzpyrene in low-temperature carbonization and smoke condensates; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 9 (1966) 36–37. 2200. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zu Beurteilung von Tabakzusatzstoffen auf Grund ihrer Pyrolyseprodukte. 2. Mitteilung. Stärke und ihre Derivate [A contribution to the evaluation of tobacco additives on the basis of their pyrolysis products. 2. Starch and its derivatives]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 9 (1966) 106–107. 2201. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zu Beurteilung von Tabakzusatzstoffen auf Grund ihrer Pyrolyseprodukte [A contribution to the evaluation of tobacco additives on the basis of their pyrolysis products]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 9 (1966) 333–334. 2202. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Zusatzstoffen zu Takakwaren. 4. Mitteilung [Results of smoldering tests on dyes for the color matt finish of tobacco products. 4.]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 62 (1966) 208–210.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2203. Kröller, E.: Ergebnisse von Schwelversuchen an Farbstoffen zur Farbmattierung von Tabakwaren. 5. Mitteilung. (Gelbholzextrakt) [Results of smoldering tests on dyes for the color matt finish of tobacco products. 5. Fustic extracts]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 9 (1966) 173–174. 2204. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zu Beurteilung von Tabakzusatzstoffen auf Grund ihrer Pyrolyseprodukte [A contribution to the evaluation of tobacco additives on the basis of their pyrolysis products. 4. Aromatic substances]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 10 (1967) 277–279. 2205. Kröller, E.: Untersuchungen zum Nachweiss von Nitrosaminen in Tabakrauch und Lebensmitteln [Study of the determination of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke and food]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 63 (1967) 303–305. 2206. Kröller, E.: Untersuchungen zum Nachweiss von Nitrosaminen in Tabakrauch und Lebensmitteln. 5. Mitteilung [Study of the determination of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke and food. 5. Report]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 64 (1968) 111–113. 2207. Kröller, E.: Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung des aus dem Tabak unzersetzt in den Rauch übergehenden Thiabendazole [Determination of undecomposed thiabenzazol transferring from tobacco into the smoke]; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 65 (1969) 85–86. 2208. Kröller, E.: Ein Beitrag zu Beurteilung von Tabakzusatzstoffen auf Grund ihrer Pyrolyseprodukte. 5. Mitteilung [A contribution to the evaluation of tobacco additives on the basis of their pyrolysis products. 5.]; Bundesgesundheitsblatt 13 (1970) 321–323. 2209. Kröller, E.: Untersuchungen zum Cumaringehalt des Zigarettenrauchs [Study of the coumarin content of cigarette smoke]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 152 (1973) 216–218. 2210. Kröller, E.: Tobacco substitution products submitted to smouldering and evaporation tests to determine condensate quantities and their ingredients; Deut. Lebensm. Rundschau 71 (1975) 253–255. 2210a. Kruber, O.: Zur Kenntnis der Chrysen-Fraktion des Steinkohlenteerpechs [Information on the chrysene fraction of coal tar pitch]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 74 (1941) 1688–1692. 2210b. Kruse, E., H.-P. Mock, and B. Grimm: Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase from barley and tobaccoósequence analysis and initial expression studies; Planta 196 (2004) 796–803. 2211. Kruszynska-Pawlowska, A.: Nicotine and tar content in the smoke of some domestic (Polish) tobaccos; Buil. Centr. Lab. Przemyslu Tytiowego 1965 (No. 1–2) 63–69. 2212. Kruszynska-Pawlowska, A.: Determination of nicotine and tar in various Polish tobaccos and tobacco smoke; Wiadomosci Tytoniowe 9(6) (1965) 95. 2213. Kruszynski, A.J. and A. Henriksen: Die quantitative Bestimmung von Kohlenmonoxid im Tabakrauch [The quantitative determination of carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 9–12. 2214. Kubota, H., M.R. Guerin, and J.A. Carter: Inorganic analytical methods of tobacco smoke analysis: A comparative study; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 23, 1972, p. 35. 2215. Kubota, H., M.R. Guerin, and C.A. Pritchard: Polar apiezons for the gas chromatographic determinations of
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1348
11/24/08 2:39:48 PM
Bibliography
2216.
2217.
2218.
2219.
2220.
2221.
2222.
2223.
2224.
2225.
2226.
2227.
2228.
phenanthrene and benz[a]anthracene in smoke condensates; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 20, 1971, p. 12. Kuenzi, W., J. Chau, E. Norkus, H. Holowaschenko, H. Newmark, W. Mergens, and A.N. Conney: Caffeic and ferulic acid as blockers of nitrosamine formation; Carcinogenesis 5 (1984) 309–314. Kuffner, F.: Über Alkaloide des Tabakrauch und die Konstitution des Nicotellins [About the alkaloids in tobacco smoke and the constitution of nicotellin]; 14th Internat. Cong. Pure & Appl. Chem., Zurich Switzerland (1955); Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1956(1) 18–19. Kuffner, F.: Nikotinarme Tabake. Die technischen und biologischen Möglichkeit einer Niktoinverminderung des Tabakrohstoffes [Low-nicotine tobacco. The technical and biological possibility of reducing the nicotine in tobacco raw materials]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie (1958) 3–18 Kuffner, F.: Beitrag zur Spektrophotometrischen Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabak und Tanbakrauch [Contribution to the spectrophotometric determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1959(3) 1–4. Kuffner, F. and N. Federl: Die Konstitution des Nicotellins [The constitution of nicotellin]; Monatsh. Chem. 87 (1956) 71–81. Kuffner, F. and T. Kirchenmayer: Konstitutionsfragen und Papierchromatographie. I. Acetylierung auf der Startline [Constitutional questions and paper chromatography. Acetylation at the starting point]; Monatsh. Chem. 92 (1961) 701–706. Kuffner, F. and J. Marek: Beitrag zur Bestimmung des Rauchkondensates von Filterzigaretten [Contribution to the estimation of smoke condensate from filter cigarettes]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1961(1) 1–6. Kuffner, F. and K. Schick: Paper chromatography of tobacco alkaloids using picrates and similar derivatives; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1954(2) 1–7. Kuffner, F., K. Schick, and H. Bühn: Über die Sokratine, des Obelins, und andere Nebenalkaloide des Zigarettenrauches [About sokratine, obelin, and other secondary alkaloids in cigarette smoke]; Monatsh. Chem. 87 (1956) 749–762. Kuhles, J.: Investigation of the transition of nicotine from cigars and cigarettes with experiments on the absorption of nicotine from tobacco smoke in man; Dissertation, Würzburg University (1907) pp. 1–28. Kuhn, H.: Low-nicotine tobacco. Technical and biological possibilities of nicotine reduction in tobacco raw materials; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1958(2) 3–18. Kuhn, H.: Beitrag zur spektrophotometrischen Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabak und Tabakrauch [Contribution to the spectrophotometric determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1959(3) 1–4. Kuhn, H.: Tobacco alkaloids and their pyrolysis products in the smoke; Tobacco Alkaloid Symp., Stockholm, Sweden (1964) 37–51; Tabakalkaloide und ihre Pyrolyseprodukte im Tabakrauch [Tobacco alkaloids and their pyrolysis products in tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1964 (5) 73–82.
1349
2229. Kuhn, H.: Tobacco alkaloids and their pyrolysis products in the smoke; in: Tobacco alkaloids and related compounds, edited by U.S. von Euler, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (1965) 37–51. 2230. Kuhn, H.: Étude comparative des fumées de la cigarette et du cigare [A comparative study of the smokes from cigarette and cigar]; Proc. 4th Internat. Sci. Tob. Congr. 1966, Athens, Greece (1967) pp. 967–971. 2231. Kuhn, H. and H. Klus: Possibilities for the reduction of nicotine in cigarette smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 463–494. 2232. Kuhn, H. and J. Marek: Beitrag zur Bestimmung des Rauchkondensates von Filterzigaretten [Contribution to the determination of smoke condensate from filter cigarettes]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1961(1) 1–6. 2233. Kulshreshtha, N.P. and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of pyridines in mainstream cigarette smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 64, 2002, p. 59; J. Chromatogr. A. 985 (2003) 303–312. 2234. Kulshreshtha, N.P., W. Wood, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of pyridine and of several substituted pyridines in sidestream cigarette smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 77, 2003, p. 67. 2235. Kumar, R., M. Siddiqi, A.R. Tricker, and R. Preussmann: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and mainstream smoke of Indian cigarettes; Food Chem. Toxicol. 29 (1991) 405–408. 2235a. Kumar, V. and M.E. Spencer: Nucleotide sequence of an osmotin cDNA from the Nicotiana tabacum cv. white burley generated by the polymerase chain reaction; Plant Mol. Biol. 18 (3), (1992) 621–622. 2236. Kung, S.D., P.R. Rhodes, G.W. Schaeffer, and T.C. Tso: Hormonal effects on the biosynthesis of tobacco RuBPCase in vitro; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 44–49. 2236a. Kung, S.D. and T.C. Tso: Tobacco leaf protein: Molecular biology and genetic manipulation; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 7 (1981) 154–177. 2237. Kuratsune, M.: Benzo[a]pyrene content of certain pyrogenic materials; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 16 (1956) 1485–1496. 2238. Kuratsune, M. and W.C. Hueper: Polycyclic hydrocarbons in coffee soot; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 20 (1958) 37–51. 2239. Kurilo, M.E.: Paraffins of tobacco; U.S.S.R. State Inst. Tob. Inv., Bull., 69 (1930) 35. 2240. Kurilo, M.E.: Parafiny tabaka [Tobacco paraffins]; Sbornik Rabot Khimii Tabak (1) No. 69 (1930) 45. Data cited in: The chemistry and technology of tobacco, edited by A.A. Shmuk, Pishchepromizdat, Moscow (1961) pp. 1–768. 2241. Kurilo, M.E.: Estimation of the aromatic substances in tobacco smoke; Vsesoy. Inst. Tabachnoi Promysh. Publ. No. 104 (1933) 33–39. 2241a. Kusaba, S., Y. Kano-Murakami, M. Matsuoka, M. Tamaoki, T. Sakamoto, I. Yamaguchi, and M. Fukumoto: Alteration of hormone levels in transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing the rice homeobox gene OSH1; Plant Physiol. 116 (1998) 471–476.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1349
11/24/08 2:39:48 PM
1350
2242. Kusama, M., S. Arai, S. Ikegami, and I. Morishita: Gas chromatographic determination of menthol in mentholated cigarette flavor; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 137–139. 2243. Kusama, N., S. Ishigura, and S. Sugawara: Comparison of vapor phase components of the smokes from lamina and midrib cigarettes of flue-cured tobacco leaves; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 119 (1977) 103–106. 2244. Kusama, N., H. Sakuma and S. Sugawara: Low boiling compounds in cellulose smoke; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 42 (1978) 479–481. 2245. Kushnir, I., P.A. Barr, and O.T. Chortyk: An improved quantitative method for volatile phenols; Anal. Chem. 42 (1970) 1619–1621. 2246. Kuter, E., M. Procak, and J. Zborowski: The use of gas chromatography for the determination of humectants in tobacco; Biul. Cent. Lab. Tyton (1979) 71–80. 2247. Kütt, H.: Studien über die Vollständigkeit der Verbrennung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch [Studies on the completeness of combustion of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Dissertation, Würzburg University (1915) pp. 1–40. 2247a. Lacassagne, A., N.P. Buu-Hoï, R. Daudel, and F. Zajdela: The relation between carcinogenic activity and the physical and chemical properties of angular benzacridines; Adv. Cancer Res. 4 (1956) 316–369. 2248. Lacassagne, A., N.P. Buu-Hoï, and G. Rudall: Inhibition of the carcinogenic action produced by a weakly carcinogenic hydrocarbon on a highly active hydrocarbon; Brit. J. Exptl. Path. 26 (1945) 5–12. 2249. Lacassagne, A., N.P. Buu-Hoï, and F. Zajdela: Activité cancérigène d’hydrocarbures polycycliques derivés du naphtacène [Carcinogenic activity of polycyclc hydrocarbons derived from naphthacene]; Compt. Rend. 250 (1960) 3547–3548. 2250. Lacassagne, A., N.P. Buu-Hoï, F. Zajdela, and F.A. Vingiello: The true dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, a new, potent carcinogen; Naturwissenschaften 55 (1968) 43. 2250a. Lacasse, M., M. Fournier, and M. Fortier: Toxicological and chemical characterization of the combustion products of a single tobacco component: Chlorogenic acid; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 34, 2006, pp. 36–37. 2251. Lagoutte, D., G. Lombard, and S. Nisseron: Determination of organic acids in cigarette smoke by high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis; J. Chromatog. 684 (1994) 251–257. 2252. Lakritz, L., H.D. Bradley, J.H. Terrell, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXXVI. Changes in smoke composition and filtration by artificial alteration of smoke pH: Vapor phase constituents; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 71–73. 2253. Lakritz, L., R.L. Stedman, and E.D. Strange: Artificial alteration of smoke pH: Effects on formic and acetic acids and phenols; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 31, 1969, p. 22; Composition studies on tobacco. XXXIX. Changes in smoke composition and filtration by artificial alteration of smoke pH: Formic and acetic acids and volatile phenols; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 104–108. 2254. Lakritz, L., R.L. Stedman, E.D. Strange, and D.G. Bailey: Attempts to alter the reducing properties and composition of cigarette smoke by the use of additives;
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2254a.
2255.
2256.
2257.
2258.
2259.
2260.
2260a.
2261.
2261a.
2262.
2262a.
2263.
2264.
2265.
24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 23, 1970, p. 14; Lakritz, L., E.D. Strange, D.G. Bailey and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XLV. Use of tobacco additives to alter the composition and reducing properties of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 120–123. Laloi, C., D. Mestres-Ortega, Y. Marco, Y. Meyer, and J.-P. Reichheld: The arabidopsis cytosolic thioredoxin h5 gene induction by oxidative stress and its w-boxmediated response to pathogen elicitor; Plant Physiol. 134 (2004) 1006–1016. Lam, J.: 3,4-Benzpyrene as a product of pyrolysis of aliphatic hydrocarbons; Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. 37 (1955) 421–428. Lam, J.: Isolation and identification of 3,4-benzpyrene, chrysene, and a number of other aromatic hydrocarbons in the pyrolysis products of dicetyl; Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. 39 (1956) 198–206. Lam, J.: Determination of 3,4-benzpyrene and other aromatic compounds formed by pyrolysis of aliphatic tobacco hydrocarbons; Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 39 (1956) 207–210. Lam, J.: Some consideration of the mechanism of the high temperature pyrolysis of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons; Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. 45 (1959) 237. Lam, J.: Yield of cigarette smoke condensates in relation to rate of smoking and butt-length in king-size cigarettes, non-filter cigarettes and filter cigarettes; Ugeskr. Laeg. 127 (1965) 380–383. Lam, J., B.O. Pedersen, and T. Thomasen: Pyrolytic disintegration of selected tobacco constituents and pyrosynthetic formation of aromatic hydrocarbons from cleavage products formed by pyrolysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 1–9. Lance, B., R.C. Durley, D.M. Reid, T.A. Thorpe, and R.P. Pharis: Metabolism of [3H]Gibberellin A20 in lightand dark-grown tobacco callus cultures; Plant Physiol. 58 (1976) 387–392. Landahl, H.D. and T.N. Tracewell: An investigation of cigarette smoke as an aerosol with special reference to retention in lungs of human subjects; Trans. Illinois State Acad. Sci. 50 (1957) 213–219. Lang, K.F. and I. Eigen: Im Steinkohlenteer nachgewiesene organische Verbindungen [Organic compounds detected in coal tar]; Fortsch. Chem. Fortschr. 8 (1967) 91–170. Langer, A.M., A.D. Machler, E.C. Rubin, and I.J. Selikoff: Inorganic particles in cigars and cigar smoke; Science 174 (1971) 585–587. Larkins, D.: Selective removal of phenolic compounds on a per-puff basis; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 47, 2006, p. 45. Larson, P.S.: Metabolism of nicotine and nature of tobacco smoke irritants; Ind. Eng. Chem. 44 (1952) 279–283. Larson, P.S., H.B. Haag, and H. Silvette: Tobacco: Experimental and clinical studies; Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore, MD (1961). Larson, P.S. and E.S. Harlow: Some current applications of carbon-14 to animal and human physiological research: Studies with tobacco and its constituents;
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1350
11/24/08 2:39:48 PM
Bibliography
2266.
2267.
2268.
2269.
2270.
2271.
2272.
2273.
2274.
2275.
2276.
2277.
2278.
2279.
2280.
UNESCO Int. Conf. on Radioisotopes in Scientific Res. Int. J. App. Rad. Isotopes 2 (1957) 238. Larson, P.S. and H. Silvette: Tobacco: Experimental and clinical studies. Supplement I; Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD (1968); Tobacco: Experimental and clinical studies. Supplement II; Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD (1971); Tobacco: Experimental and clinical studies. Supplement III; Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, MD (1975). Laskowski, K.: Components of tobacco smoke and their absorption in the respiratory system of the smoker; Rocz. Panstwowego Zadlaku Hig. 2 (1951) 139–160. Latarjet, R., J.L. Cuzin, M. Hubert-Habart, B. Muel, and R. Royer: Détection quantitative du 3,4 benzopyrène formé par combustion du papier à cigarettes et du tabac [Quantitative detection of 3,4-benzpyrene formed by the combustion of cigarette paper and tobacco]; Bull. Assoc. France Étude Cancer 43 (1956) 180–198. Latimer, P.H.: Determination of alkaloids in tobacco smoke by paper chromatography; 7th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 7, Paper No. 4, 1953, p. 4. Latimer, P.H.: Compounds isolated from tobacco and tobacco smoke; RDM, 1955, No. 47, October 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610337 -0357. Latimer, P.H.: The estimation of pentanoic and hexanoic acids in tobacco and tobacco smoke using gas chromatography; RDR, 1957, No. 8, June 7, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500931280 -1301. Latimer, P.H.: Lowering the nicotine content of burley tobacco: Treating tobacco with propylene oxide; RDM, 1960, No. 94, December 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500600505 -0509. Latimer, P.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. I. Preliminary investigation of burley tobacco; RDR, 1961, No. 29, May 31, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500936736 -6753. Latimer, P.H.: The determination of phenol in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 37, July 25, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500937136 -7153; 504757343 -7360. Latimer, P.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. II. A tentative quality index for burley tobacco; RDM, 1962, No. 28, April 25, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500601242 -1251. Latimer, P.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. III. Effect of aging on several samples of TBMX blend and on G7 aged alone or as part of the TBMX blend; RDM, 1962, No. 31, May 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601262 -1269. Latimer, P.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. IV. Preliminary investigation of flue-cured tobacco treated with MH-30; RDM, 1962, No. 32, May 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601270 -1281. Latimer, P.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. VII. Evaluation of green leaf samples of 1961 and 1962 burley crops; RDR, 1963, No. 43, June 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961868 -1890. Latimer, P.H.: The radioactivity of tobacco. I. Study of burley tobacco; RDM, 1963, No. 20, February 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612428 -2439. Latimer, P.H.: Determination of coumarin in cigarette and smoking tobaccos; RDM, 1964, No. 71, July 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602374 -2379.
1351
2281. Latimer, P.H.: Determination of vanillin and ethylvanillin in tobacco products; RDM, 1964, No. 78, July 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602392 -2403. 2282. Latimer, P.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. VIII. Partial identification of components in steam-volatile essential oil of burley tobacco; RDM, 1964, No. 79, August 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602404 -2416. 2283. Latimer, P.H., J.G. Ashburn, and S.O. Jones: Turkish tobacco. Progress report on the isolation and identification of some of its constituents; RDR, 1954, No. 7, August 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501662791 -2867. 2284. Latimer, P.H. and J.A. Giles: Isolation of l-menthol from Marlboro cigarette tobacco; RDM, 1956, No. 14, May 30. 2285. Latimer, P.H. and J.A. Giles: The fate of disodium isopropylmalonate during smoking. A stable isotope study; RDR, 1957, No. 14, October 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500931368 -1389. 2286. Latimer, P.H. and J.A. Giles: Some fatty acids in Turkish sand; RDM, 1961, No. 67, August 22, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500600887 -0891. 2287. Latimer, P.H. and J.A. Giles: An isotope dilution analysis of sec-butylmalonic acid; RDR, 1958, No. 16, October 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500932411 -2424. 2288. Latimer, P.H. and H.E. Moser: The determination of five-carbon and six-carbon acids by gas chromatography; RDR, 1960, No. 24, July 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500934871 -4889. 2289. Latimer, P.H. and H.E. Moser: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. V. Investigation of 1960 burley tobaccos before aging and at the end of one year of aging; RDR, 1963, No. 8, February 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961149 -1172. 2290. Latimer, P.H. and H.E. Moser: Gas chromatographic analysis of the essential oils of tobacco. VI. Evaluation of the 1962 experimental burley tobaccos; RDM, 1963, No. 38, May 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612602 -2612. 2291. Latimer, P.H. and H.E. Moser: Five- and six-carbon acid content of Turkish tobaccos; RDR, 1963, No. 42, May 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961853 -1866. 2292. Latimer, P.H. and M.P. Newell: Determination of sclareolide in (I) oxidation products, (II) on G7, and (III) in smoke from G7 cigarette containing sclareolide; RDM, 1964, No. 44, April 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602276 -2285. 2292a. Latimer, P.H. and A. Rodgman: Compounds reported in tobacco smoke; Memorandum, September, 1957, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503015383 -5387. 2293. Laurene, A.H.: The composition of the vapor phase of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1955, No. 11, October 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501663325 -3341. 2294. Laurene, A.H.: Nicotine analysis: in: The encyclopedia of spectroscopy (1960) pp. 68–70. 2295. Laurene, A.H.: Adsorption of phenol by untreated Estron ; RDM, 1963, No. 5, January 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612340 -2343. 2295a. Laurene, A.H.: Evaluation of triacetate B as a cigarette filter material; RDM, 1963, No. 6, January 8, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500612344 -2346. 2296. Laurene, A.H.: Sample cigarette selection for analysis of aldehydes in smoke; RDM, 1964, No. 111, December 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602547 -2550.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1351
11/24/08 2:39:49 PM
1352
2297. Laurene, A.H.: Calculations on the concentration of nitrogen dioxide in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1964, No. 112, December 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602551 -2555. 2298. Laurene, A.H.: The effect of cigarette moisture content on component analysis of smoke; RDM, 1965, No. 17, February 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602612 -2614. 2299. Laurene, A.H.: Analysis of menthol in pipe smoke; RDM, 1966, No. 9, February 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603565 -3569. 2299a. Laurene, A.H.: Personal communication (1965). 2300. Laurene, A.H., R.H. Cundiff, and G.H. Greene: Determination of glycerol and propylene glycol in cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 31, 1964, p. 49; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 1–4. 2301. Laurene, A.H., G.H. Greene, and D.L. Drummond: The quantitative analysis of cigarette smoke. Part II; RDR, 1964, No. 18, April 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963479 -3489. 2302. Laurene, A.H. and B.A. Harbin: Improved gas chromatographic determination of acetaldehyde, acrolein, and acetone in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 37. 2303. Laurene, A.H. and T.G. Harrell: A spectrophotometric method for the determination of nicotine in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1955, No. 14, December 27, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501663457 -3476; Improved spectrophotometric method for determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 30 (1958) 1800–1802. 2304. Laurene, A.H., L.A. Lyerly, G.H. Greene, and B.A. Harbin: Supplementary report: The quantitative analysis of cigarette smoke. Part II; RDR, 1964, No. 21, April 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963602 -3610. 2305. Laurene, A.H., L.A. Lyerly, and G.W. Young: The development of a direct vapor chromatographic determination of acetaldehyde, acrolein, and acetone in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1964, No. 38, September 2, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501008929 -8945; Direct vapor chromatographic determination of acetaldehyde, acrolein, and acetone in cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 32, 1964, pp. 49–51; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 150–153. 2306. Laurene, A.H., D.H. Piehl, and J.H. Reynolds IV: Evaluation of filter additives for selective removal of phenol from cigarette smoke; RDM, 1970, No. 58, June 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614618 -4625. 2306a. Laurene, A.H. and W.E. Walker Jr: Adsorption of phenol vapor by untreated Estron; RDM, 1963, No. 5, January 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612340 -2343. 2307. Laurene, A.H. and G.W. Young: The development of a mass spectrophotometric analysis of phenols in tobacco smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 38, July 25, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500937155 -7192. 2308. Laurene, A.H. and G.W. Young: The development of a mass spectrometric sampling system for compounds of high molecular weight; RDM, 1962, No. 13, February 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601159 -1164. 2309. Laurene, A.H., G.W. Young, and G.H. Greene: The composition of Camel mainstream smoke; RDM, 1959, No. 16, February 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500611328 -1331. 2310. Laurene, A.H., G.W. Young, and G.H. Greene: The quantitative analysis of cigarette smoke. Part I; RDR,
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2311.
2312.
2312a.
2313.
2313a.
2313b.
2313c.
2313d.
2313e.
2314.
2314a.
2314b.
2314c.
1959, No. 20, September 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933548 -3588. Laurene, A.H., G.W. Young, and L.A. Lyerly: Phenol content in smoke as a function of the age of the cigarette; RDM, 1963, No. 17, February 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612411 -2420. Laurene, A.H., G.W. Young, and L.A. Lyerly: Factors which affect the phenol content of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1963, No. 58, November 13, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500962130 -2163. Laurent, F., L.F. Wentzinger, T.J. Bach, and M.-A. Hartmann: Inhibition of squalene synthase and squalene epoxidase in tobacco cells triggers an up-regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase; Plant Physiol. 130 (2002) 334–346. Lauterbach, J.H.: A critical assessment of recent work on the application of gas/particle partitioning theories to cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2000) 65–83. Lauterbach, J.H.: Smoke chemistry: A useful predictor of smoke toxicology? Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 28 (2002) 6–68. Lauterbach, J.H.: The Portland to Bethesda to Atlanta nicotine express: The perils of ignoring particulatephase water when studying gas-particle partitioning of nicotine and other semivolatile organics in cigarette mainstream smoke; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 57, 2005, pp. 49–50. Lauterbach, J.H.: A review of some research presented at the twentieth Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference: Part 1. A celebration of the fortieth anniversary of the application of gas-particle partitioning theory to the cigarette mainstream smoke aerosol; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 36, 2006, p. 38. Lauterbach, J.H.: A review of some research presented at the twentieth Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference: Part 2. Complexed cyanide in collected smoke: Is it still viable at age forty? 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 37, 2006, pp. 38–39. Lauterbach, J.H., M. Kalaitzoglou, and C. Samara: Effects of cigarette design on estimated activity coefficients for some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream cigarette smoke; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 49, 2006, p. 46. Lavit-Lamy, D. and N.P. Buu-Hoï: The true nature of “dibenzo[a,l]pyrene” and its known derivatives; Chem. Comm. 4 (1966) 92–94. LaVoie, E.J., J.D. Adams, J. Reinhardt, A. Rivenson, and D. Hoffmann: Toxicity studies on clove cigarette smoke and constituents of clove: Determination of the LD50 of eugenol by intratracheal instillation in rats and hamsters; Arch. Toxicol. 59 (1986) 78–81. LaVoie, E.J., J.D. Adams, J. Reinhardt, A. Rivenson, and D. Hoffmann: Comments on the toxicity of constituents in clove cigarette smoke; Arch. Toxicol. 59 (1986) 298–299. LaVoie, E.J., S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: The less harmful cigarette and tobacco smoke flavors; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 251–260.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1352
11/24/08 2:39:49 PM
1353
Bibliography
2315. LaVoie, E.J., A. Shigematsu, and D. Hoffmann: Aromatic amines and N-heterocyclics in tobacco distillates; 184th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc.: Paper No. 53 (1982). 2315a. LaVoie, E.J., A. Shigematsu, and A. Rivenson: The carcinogenicity of quinoline and benzoquinolines in newborn CD-lq mice; Japan J. Cancer Res. 78 (1987) 139–143. 2316. LaVoie, E.J., A. Shigematsu, P. Tucciarone, J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Comparison of the steam-volatile components of commercial cigarette, pipe, and chewing tobaccos. J. Agr. Food Chem. 33 (1985) 876–879. 2317. LaVoie, E.J., P. Tucciarone, M. Kagan, J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Analyses of steam distillates and aqueous extracts of smokeless tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 37 (1989) 154–157. 2318. Lawson, F.R., C. Corley, and M.S. Schechter: Insecticide residues on tobacco during 1962; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 110–112. 2318a. Lawton, K., E. Ward, G. Payne, M. Moyer, and J. Ryals: Acidic and basic class III chitinase mRNA accumulation in response to TMV infection of tobacco; Plant Mol. Biol. 19 (1992) 735–743. 2319. Lazar, P.H., I. Chouroulinkov, C. Izard, P. Morée-Testa, and D. Herman: Bioassays of carcinogenicity after fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate; Biomedicine 20 (1974) 214. 2320. Lazar, P.H., I. Chouroulinkov, C. Libermann, and M. Guerin: Amounts of 3,4-benzpyrene (3,4-BP) in cigarette smoke condensates and carcinogenicity; 9th Internat. Cancer Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1966); Benzo[a] pyrene content and carcinogenicity of cigarette smoke condensate: Results of short-term and long-term tests; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 37 (1966) 573–579. 2321. Leach, J.T. and E.D. Alford: Studies on the chemical composition of smoke TPM; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 21, 1968, p. 12. 2322. Leach, J.T., E.D. Alford, and E.F. Litzinger: 4-Vinylcatechol in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 53. 2323. Leaderer, B.P., W.S. Cain, R. Iseroff, and L.G. Berglund: Ventilation requirements in buildings. II. Particulate matter and carbon monoxide from cigarette smoking; Atmos. Environ. 18 (1984) 99–106. 2324. Leaderer, B.P. and S.K. Hammond: Evaluation of vaporphase nicotine and respirable suspended particle mass as markers for environmental tobacco smoke; Environ. Sci. Technol. 25 (1991) 770–777. 2325. Leaf, C.D., A.J. Vecchio, D.A. Roe, and H. Hotchkiss: Influence of ascorbic acid dose on N-nitrosoproline in humans; Carcinogenesis 8 (1987) 791–795. 2326. LeBon, G.: La fumée du tabac [Tobacco smoke]; 2nd Edition, Paris, France (1880). 2326a. Le Bouquin, R., M. Skrabs, R. Kahn, I. Benveniste, J.-P. Salaun, L. Schreiber, F. Durst, and F. Pinot: CYP94A5, a new cytochrome P450 from Nicotiana tabacum is able to catalyze the oxidation of fatty acids to the omega-alcohol and to the corresponding diacid; Eur. J. Biochem. 268 (2001) 3083–3090. 2326b. LeBourvellec, G., C. Rigoulay, L. LeBec, and D. Raverdy: Reconstituted tobacco treatment to reduce TSNA content of tobacco products; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 38, 2006, p. 40. 2327. Ledford, C.J., G.P. Morie, and C.A. Glover: Separation and determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
2327a.
2327b.
2327c.
2327d.
2328.
2328a.
2329.
2330.
2330a.
2330b. 2330c.
2331.
in cigarette smoke by high resolution liquid chromatography; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 11, 1969, p. 8; Separation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke by high-resolution liquid chromatography; Tob. Sci. 14 (1969) 158–160; Anal. Chem. 47 (1975) 1155–1157. Lee, C.K., C.W. Fulp, D.W. Bombick, and D.J. Doolittle: Nicotine and cotinine inhibit the mutagenicity of N-nitrosamines present in tobacco smoke; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 44, 1994, p. 6. Lee, C.K., C.W. Fulp, D.W. Bombick, and D.J. Doolittle: Inhibition of mutagenicity of N-nitrosamines by tobacco smoke and its constituents; Mutation Res. 367 (1996) 83–92. Lee, C.K., J.A. Munoz, C.W. Fulp, K.-M. Chang, J.C. Rogers, M.F. Borgerding, and D.J. Doolittle: Inhibitory activity of cigarette-smoke condensate on the mutagenicity of heterocyclic amines; Mutation Res. 322 (1994) 21–32. Lee, C.K. and E.A. Reed: Ames test on smoke condensate: A summary; R&DM, 1983, No. 20, May 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661154 -1156; 514903578 -3610. Lee, M.L., M. Novotny, and K.D. Bartle: Gas chromatography/mass spectrometric and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometric studies of carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco and marijuana smoke condensate; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 405–416. Lee, M.-R., J. Jeng, W.-S. Hsiang, and B.-H. Hwang: Determination of pyrolysis products of smoked methamphetamine mixed with tobacco by tandem mass spectrometry; J. Anal. Tox. 23 (1999) 41–45. Lee, S.J., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: On the occurrence and analysis of nitrocatechol(s) in cigarette smoke; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 12, 1982, p. 6. Lee, S.-Y., W.-W. Lee, K.-K. Lee, and Y.-H. Kim: Multivariate analysis among leaf/smoke components and sensory properties about tobacco leaves blending ratio; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 82, 2004, p. 73. Lee, Y.T., S.M. Kim, Y.H. Kim, K.S. Rhim, K.H. Lee, C.H. Shin, and Y.T. Kim: Effects of polymer-treated silica-gel on the delivery of smoke components; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 23, 1991, p. 15. Leete, E.: The biosynthesis of azetidine-2-carboxylic acid; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964) 3162. Leete, E.: Biosynthesis and metabolism of the tobacco alkaloids; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 365–388. Leete, E.: Aberrant syntheses in higher plants. 4. Aberrant biosynthesis of 5-fluoroanabasine from 5-fluoro[5,6– 14C,13C2]nicotinic acid, established by means of carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance; J. Org. Chem. 44 (1979) 165–168.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1353
11/24/08 2:39:49 PM
1354
2331a. Leete, E.: The methylation of nornicotine to nicotine, a minor biosynthetic pathway in Nicotiana tabacum; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 113–116. 2332. Leete, E. and M.R. Chedekel: Metabolism of nicotine in Nicotiana glauca; Phytochemistry 13 (1974) 1853–1859. 2333. Leete, E., K.C. Ranbom, and R.M. Riddle: The metabolism of anatabine to A,B-dipyridyl in Nicotiana species; Phytochemistry 18 (1979) 75–78. 2334. Leete, E. and M.-L. Yu: The incorporation of nicotine[2,3–13C2] into nicotine and nornicotine established by NMR; Phytochemistry 19 (1980) 1093–1097. 2335. Lefemine, D.V., E.T. Alvord, and S.Z. Cardon: Identification of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette paper smoke and tars; Southeastern Reg. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Birmingham, AL (1954), see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1954, No. 26, November 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504913137 -3140. 2336. Leffingwell, J.C.: Tobacco flavoring for smoking products: II; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 55–57. 2337. Leffingwell, J.C.: Nitrogen components of leaf and their relationship to smoking quality and aroma; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 2 (1976) 1–31. 2338. Leffingwell, J.C.: Leaf chemistry. A. Basic chemical constituents of tobacco leaf and differences among tobacco types; Chapter 8A in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 265–284; Chemical constituents of tobacco leaf and differences among tobacco types; Leffingwell Repts. 1 (2001) 1–56. 2339. Leffingwell, J.C. and E.D. Alford: Phenolic aroma constituents of Kentucky fire cured tobacco; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 17, 1998, p. 23, see www. leffingwell.com/firecured.hhtm. 2339a. Leffingwell, J.C. and E.D. Alford: Volatile constituents of Perique tobacco; Electronic J. Environ. Agr. Food Chem. 4 (2005) 899–915. 2339b. Leffingwell, J.C. and D. Leffingwell: TCRC Symposium: Chemical and sensory aspects of tobacco flavor: An overview; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 14 (1988) 169–218. 2340. Leffingwell, J.C. and G. Worrell: Evaluation of C11-C18 hydrocarbons in filter tow for benzopyrene removal (Chemfilt Corporation of America); RDM, 1972, No. 8, February 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615356 -5360. 2341. Leffingwell, J.C., H.J. Young, and E. Bernasek: Tobacco flavoring for smoking products; R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC (1972), see www.rjrtdocs.com 509248328 -8365. 2341a. Legg, P.D. and B.W. Smeeton: Breeding and genetics; Chapter 2 in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 32–48. 2342. Lehmann, K.B.: Vorläufiger Bericht über Tabakuntersuchungen [Preliminary reports on tobacco studies]; Hyg. Rundschau 17 (1907) 1100–1101. 2342a. Lehmann, K.B.: Investigations of tobacco smoke; Münch. Med. Wchnschr. 55 (1908) 723–725. 2343. Lehmann, K.B.: Chemical and toxicological studies on tobacco, tobacco smoke and tobacco smoking; Arch. Hyg. 68 (1909) 319–420. 2344. Lehmann, K.B. and K. Gundermann: Neue Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung des Blausäure für die Giftigkeit des Tabakrauches [New investigations on
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2345.
2346.
2347.
2348. 2349.
2350
2351.
2351a.
2352.
2353.
2353a.
2354.
2354a.
2355.
2355a.
the significance of hydrocyanic acid in the toxicity of tobacco smoke]; Arch. Hyg. 76 (1912) 98–115. Leidy, R.B. and T.J. Sheets: Residues of Ethoprop and Disulfoton in soils and flue-cured toacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 127–133. Leidy, R.B., T.J. Sheets, and L.A. Nelson: Residues of Fluvalinate and Permethrin on flue-cured toacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 191–203. Leikola, E. and E. Rautavaara: Der Anteil des Kohlenmonoxid an der durch des Tabakrauchen verursachten Blutsdrucksteigerung [The importance of carbon monoxide in the increase in blood pressure caused by tobacco smoking]; Acta Soc. Med. Finn. Duodecim. 16 (1934) 3–25. Leiserson, L.: Tobacco smoke analysis; Tobacco (New York, NY) 12 (August 5, 1955). Leiserson, L. and T.B. Walker: Paper chromatography of nicotine and related compounds; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper No. 18, 1954, p. 6; Anal. Chem. 27 (1955) 1129–1130. Leon, J., V. Shulaev, N. Yalpani, M.A. Lawton, and I. Raskin: Benzoic acid 2-hydroxylase, a soluble oxygenase from tobacco, catalyzes salicylic acid biosynthesis; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 10413–10417. LeRoux, J.H.: The selective retention of phenol by cigarette filter materials; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 157–167. Lesca, P.: Protective effects of ellagic acid and other plant phenols on benzo[a]pyrene-induced neoplasia in mice; Carcinogenesis 4 (1983) 1651–1653 Lettré, H. and A. Jahn: Zur Bildung aromatischer Kohlenwasserstoffe während des Rauchprozesses [The formation of aromatic hydrocarbons during the smoking process]; Naturwissenschaften 42 (1955) 210. Lettré, H., A. Jahn, and C. Hausbeck: Nachweis von 3,4-Benzpyrene unter den Rauchprodukten [Detection of 3,4-benzpyrene in smoke products]; Angew. Chem. 68 (1956) 212–213. Levasseur, G. and M.J. Kaiserman: pH and nicotine delivery on different tobacco products on the Canadian market; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 20, 2006, pp. 26–27. Levasseur, G., M.J. Kaiserman, and J. Fillion: Determination of the exposure levels of smokers to chemicals present in smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 12, 2004, p. 27. Levasseur, G., M.J. Kaiserman, and J. Fillion: Heterocyclic aromatic amines contribution to the mutagenic activity of tobacco smoke; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 14, 2005, p. 26. Levin, M.L., H. Goldstein, and P.R. Gerhardt: Cancer and tobacco smoking: A preliminary report; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 143 (1950) 336–338. Levitt, R.C., C. LeGraverene, D. Nebert, and O. Pelkonnen: Effects of harmane and norharmane on the mutagenicity and binding to DNA of benzo[a]pyrene metabolites in vitro and on aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in cell culture; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 79 (1977) 1167–1175.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1354
11/24/08 2:39:49 PM
Bibliography
2356. Lewis, C.E.: Tobacco composition. Investigation of the water-soluble extract of FC7 tobacco; RDR, 1977, No. 1, January 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004906 -4918. 2357. Lewis, G.P., W.J. Jusko, L.L. Coughlin, and S. Hartz: Contribution of cigarette smoking to cadmium accumulation in man; Lancet 1972(i) 291–292. 2358. Lewis, L.S., A.B. Norman, and A. Robinson: The evaluation of palladium/copper catalysts for CO removal; R&DM, 1990, No. 35, February 14, see www.rjrtdocs. com 508381680 -1697. 2359. Li, P., M. Wu, and J. Xie: Changes in levels of amino acids and basic components in burley tobacco produced by roasting; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 459–466. 2360. Li, P., F. Rasouli, and M.R. Hajaligol: Application of nanoparticle iron oxide in cigarette for simultaneous CO and NO removal in the mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 1–8. 2361. Li, Q., S. Haut, and W. Hempfling: Polyphenol concentration and its antioxidant capacity in tobaccos; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 35, 2001, pp. 40–41. 2362. Li, Q., M. Krauss, M. Maher, G. Bokelman, and F. Gadani: Reduction of tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) by increasing endogenous antioxidants in burley tobaccos: A review of results from field experiments; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 23, 2003, pp. 31–32. 2362a. Li, W., G. Guo, and G. Zheng: Agrobacterium transformation: State of the art and future prospect; Chinese Sci. Bull. 45 (2000) 1537–1546. 2363. Li, X. and L. Bush: TSNA changes in cured tobacco powder in short-time periods; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 30, 2004, pp. 38–39. 2363a. Liang, J.C. and B.R. Brinkley: Chemical probes and possible targets for the induction of aneuploidy; in: Aneuploidy: Etiology and mechanisms, edited by V. Dellarco, P. Voytek, and A. Hollaender, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1985) pp. 491–505. 2364. Lickint, F.: Neuere Erkenntnisse auf dem Gebiete der Beziehungen zwischen Raucherbronchitis und Bronchialkrebs [New knowledge in the area of the relationship between smoker bronchitis and branchial cancer]; Verhandl. Deut. Ges. Inn. Med. 62 (1956) 121–125. 2364a. Lijinsky, W. and P. Shubik: Benzo[a]pyrene and other polynuclear hydrocarbons in charcoal-broiled meat; Science 145 (1964) 53–54. 2364b. Lijinsky, W. and P. Shubik: Polynuclear hydrocarbon carcinogens in cooked meat and smoked food; Ind. Med. Surg. 34 (1965) 152. 2365. Lindsey, A.J.: The composition of tobacco smoke. Some minor organic constituents; Analyst 80 (1955) 164. 2366. Lindsey, A.J.: Tobacco smoke; Brit. Med. J. 1959(ii) 506. 2367. Lindsey, A.J.: The composition of cigarette smoke: Studies on stubs and tips; Brit. J. Cancer 13 (1959) 195–199. 2368. Lindsey, A.J.: Some observations on the chemistry of tobacco smoke; in: Tobacco and health, edited by G. James and T. Rosenthal, Springfield, MA (1962) 21–32.
1355
2369. Lindsey, A.J., I.E. Burrows, G.A.L. Smith, P.J. Sullivan, and J. Wright: Thin layer chromatography. Some applications in tobacco chemistry; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 23, 1963, p. 17. 2370. Lindsey, A.J., K. Persaud, and A. Candeli: Reduction of benzpyrene in tobacco smoke; Brit. Med. J. 1959(ii) 821. 2371. Ling, H.W. and C.B. Wynn Parry: The amount of nicotine absorbed in smoking; Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemotherapy 4 (1949) 313–314. 2371a. Linsmaier, E.M. and F. Skoog: Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures; Physiol. Plant. 18 (1965) 100–127. 2372. Lionetti, G. and N. Carugno: Gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in tobacco and in tobacco smoke by NSPD detector; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 177–178; CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1976: Paper SO03, 92–93. 2373. Lionetti, G., N. Carugno, and M. Neri: Determination of nitrogen oxides in cigarette smoke with a gas-sensing electrode; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 177; CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1976: Paper SO02, 92. 2374. Lipp, G.: Über die Zusammensetzung des Cigarettenrauches und ihre Abhängigkeit von der Tabaksorte [The composition of cigarette smoke and its dependence on tobacco type]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 1–13. 2375. Lipp, G.: Bemerkung zur Korrektur der Vorschrift für die Nikotinbestimmung [Remarks about corrections of regulations for the determination of nicotine]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 83–85. 2376. Lipp, G.: Über die selektive Wirkung von Cigarettenfiltern auf Nikotin und Phenole sowie ihre Abhängigkeit von der Tabaksorte [The selective action of cigarette filters on nicotine and phenol as well as their dependence on tobacco type]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 109–127. 2377. Lipp, G.: Zur Definition der Selektivität und der verschiedenen Rauchstrome der Cigaretten [Definitions of the various smoke streams of a cigarette]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 220–222. 2378. Lipp, G.: Zum Problem vergleichender Untersuchungen an porösenen und perforierten Cigarettenpapieren [Comparative investigations of porous cigarette papers and perforated papers]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 477–483. 2378a. Lippiello, P.M., W.S. Caldwell, J.D. deBethizy, T.A. Perfetti, J.H. Robinson, S.B. Sears, W.S. Simmons, and R.W. Williams: An integrated research program for the study of nicotine and its analogs; R&DM, 1988, No. 265, October 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514915572 -5681. 2379. Little, C.A., A.J. Dyakonov, and J.J. Chapman: Investigation of phenolic radicals in tar by direct ESR measurements at low temperatures; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 49, 2004, pp. 50–51. 2379a. Little, C.A., A.J. Dyakonov, R.T. Walker, F. R. Perini, D.S. Passer, and J. Guan: Effects of phenolic compounds on the combustion of tobacco; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 93, 2005, pp. 70–71. 2380. Liu, C.: Glycerol transfer in mainstream cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 111–116.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1355
11/24/08 2:39:49 PM
1356
2380a. Liu, J., D. Yin, X. Tan, and X. Zhao: Development of a Virginia type cigarette with low tar, low free radicals, and rich selenium; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST21, p. 166. 2380b. Liu, T., T.M. Cheesbrough, K.D. Kephart, and C.D. Carter: Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase from alfalfa; Plant Genome IV Conference, San Diego, CA, 1995, Paper 283. 2381. Liu, W. and D.L. Davis: Endogenous sugars affect the formation of pyrazines in roasted flue-cured tobacco; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 71, 1999, p. 59. 2382. Liu, W., R.C. Reich, W.M. Coleman III, M.F. Dube, and D.L. Davis: Labeling nitrogen containing compounds with 15N in burley tobacco; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 19, 1998, p. 24. 2383. Liu, Y.Y. and D. Hoffmann: Quantitative determination of maleic hydrazide in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 45 (1963) 2270–2273. 2384. Liu, Y.Y., I. Schmeltz, and D. Hoffmann: Maleic hydrazide and volatile hydrazines in cigarette smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 29, 1973, p. 22. 2385. Liu, Y.Y., I. Schmeltz, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXVII. Quantitative analysis of hydrazine in tobacco and cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 46 (1974) 885–889. 2385a. Lloyd, R.A. Jr: Merit research summary; RDM, 1978, No. 1, January 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509196254 -6266. 2386. Lloyd, R.A. Jr and S.C. Dillender: Fluidized bead bed puffing. Essential oil analysis L11,289A-C; MFR, 1977, No. 2, October 12; Lloyd, R.A. Jr, S.C. Dillender, and P.H. Ayers: Essential oil analysis. Comparison of CF, KFU, and TB blends. Description of method and instrumentation; RDM, 1977, No. 30, September 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606745 -6769; Lloyd, R.A. Jr: Essential oil investigation 1976–1977; RDM, 1978, No. 3, February 1. 2387. Lloyd, R.A. Jr and C.W. Miller: A rapid comparison of the smoke composition of 50% J-10 and Winston blend cigarettes; RDM, 1974, No. 12, May 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510691792 -1806. 2388. Lloyd, R.A. Jr and C.W. Miller: Pyrolysis of J-10. Identification of levoglucosenone; RDM, 1974, No. 18, August 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606631 -6645. 2389. Lloyd, R.A. Jr, C.W Miller, D.L. Roberts, J.A. Giles, J.P. Dickerson, N.H. Nelson, C.E. Rix, and P.H. Ayers: Fluecured tobacco flavor. I. Essence and essential oil components; CORESTA 1974 Symp., Montreux, Switzerland (1974); Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 40–48. 2390. Löfroth, G., R.M. Burton, L. Forehand, S.K. Hammond, R.L. Sella, R.B. Zwerdinger, and J. Lewtas: Characterization of environmental tobacco smoke; Env. Sci. Tech. 23 (1989) 610 –614. 2391. Löfroth, G. and Y. Zebühr: Polychlorinated dibenzo-pdioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 48 (1992) 789–794.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2392. Loh, H.S.: Cigarette smoking and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: A hypothesis; Irish J. Med. 142 (1973) 174–178. 2393. Lohmann, K.: The presence of sulfur in cigarettes as determined by EPR studies; J. Arkansas Med. Soc. 61 (1964) 99–101. 2394. Lokschina, S.: Tobacco toxicosis; Soviet. Vestnik. Optalmol. 8 (1936) 464–468. 2394a. Long, R.C. and J.A. Weybrew: Major chemical changes during senescence and curing; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 7 (1981) 40–74. 2395. Long, R.C. and W.W. Woltz: Environmental factors affecting the chemical composition of tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 116–163. 2396. Lorant, M.: Ist Polonium (Po210) der krebsauslösende Faktor bei übermässigen Zigaretten-Konsum? [Is polonium (Po210) the cancer-causing factor in excessive cigarette consumption?]; Med. Klin. 59 (1964) 1106–1107. 2397. Lorentzen, G. and G. Neurath: Quantitative Bestimmung von Phenolen im Tabakrauch mit 4-Aminoantipyrin (AAP) [Quantitative determination of phenols in tobacco smoke with 4-aminoantipyrin (AAP)]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 73–78. 2398. Lorenz, E., H.L. Stewart, J.H. Daniel, and C.L. Nelson: The effects of breathing tobacco smoke on Strain A mice; Cancer Res. 3 (1943) 123–124. 2398a. Lorenzen, H.C., J. Tobias, and F. Chehab: Online and offline moisture measurement; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 41, 1989, p. 34. 2399. P. Lorillard Company Research Laboratory: Selective filtration of phenol by Kent’s improved micronite filter; P. Lorillard Co., Greensboro, NC (1962) pp. 1–4, see http:// legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/bgg45a00 00325496/5500. 2400. Lotti, G., R. Izzo, and S. Baragli: Unsaponifiables and sterols of tobacco seed oils in relation to variety; Riv. Soc. Ital. Sci. Aliment. 5 (1976) 65–70. 2400a. Loughrin, J.H., T.R. Hamilton-Kemp, R. A. Andemen, and D.F. Hildebrandt: Headspace compounds from flowers of Nicotiana tabacum and related species; J. Agr. Food Chem. 38 (1990) 455–460. 2400b. Louie, R., M.G. Redinbaugh, D.T. Gordon, J.J. Abt, and R.J. Anderson: Maize necrotic streak virus, a new maize virus with similarity to species of the family Tombusviridae; Plant Dis. 84 (2000) 1133–1139. 2400c. Loureau, J.-M., T. Joyeux, C. LeMoigne, and G. LeBourvellec: Characterisation and influence of the porous structure of cigarette paper on CO deliveries. Part II. 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 64, 2006, p. 54. 2400d. Loureau, J.-M., C. LeMoigne, L. LeBec, G. LeBourvellec, J.-P. Biesse, G. Clarisse, B. Vidal, and B. Duméry: Hoffmann analytes influence of cigarette paper and filter ventilation; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 70, 2004, p. 65. 2401. Lowenthal, M.: Untersuchungen über den Nikotingehalt des Tabakrauches [Research on nicotine content of tobacco smoke]; Medical Dissertation, Würzburg University (1892).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1356
11/24/08 2:39:50 PM
1357
Bibliography
2401a. Lu, X., M. Zhao, H. Kong , J. Cai, J. Wu, M. Wu, R. Hua, J. Liu, and G. Xu: Characterization of cigarette smoke condensates by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC/TOFMS). Part 2: Basic fraction; J. Separation Sci. 27 (2003) 101–109. 2402. Lubus, J.J. and H.D. Bogue: The determination of menthol in mentholated cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 213–215. 2403. Luceri, F., G. Pieraccini, G. Moneti, and P. Dolara: Primary aromatic amines from side-stream cigarette smoke are common contaminants of indoor air; Toxicol. Ind. Hlth. 9 (1993) 405–413. 2404. Lucke, R.B., B.D. McVeety, R.B. Westerberg, F.S. Hsu and J. Whidby: Quantitation of N-nitrosamines from mainstream cigarette smoke by gas chromatography/ thermal energy analyzers detection; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 47, 1999, pp. 45–46. 2405. Lucke, R.B., B.D. McVeety, R.B. Westerberg, F.S. Hsu and J. Whidby: Quantitation of N-nitrosamines from sidestream cigarette smoke by gas chromatography/thermal energy analyzers detection; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 48, 1999, p. 46. 2406. Lucke, R.B., H.A.N. Moore, and R.B. Westerberg: Determination of TSNAs from tobacco filler by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 53, 2000, pp. 48–49. 2407. Lucke, R.B., B.R. Valenzuela, H.A.N. Moore, and R.B. Westerberg: Quantification of TSNAs in tobacco filler and mainstream cigarette smoke by LC/MS/MS; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 96, 2001, p. 76. 2407a. Lücker, J., W. Schwab, B. van Hautum, J. Blaas, L.H.W. van der Plas, H.J. Bouwmeester, and H.A. Verhoeven: Increased and altered fragrance of tobacco plants after metabolic engineering using three monoterpene synthases from lemon; Plant Physiol. 134 (2004) 510–519. 2408. Ludwig, E.: Über einige Bestandtheile des Tabakrauches [About some components of tobacco smoke]; Arch. Klin. Chir. 20 (1876) 363–364; Über die Einführung nicotinarmer Cigarren [The introduction of low-nicotine cigars]; Österr. Sanitätswesen 14 (1902) 489–492. 2408a. Ludwig, A., J. Stolz, and N. Sauer: Plant sucrose-H+ symporters mediate the transport of vitamin H; The Plant Journal 24 (2000) 503–509. 2409. Lü-Fu-Hua: Über die Erzeugung von Krebs durch Tabakteerpinselung beim Kaninchen [Production of cancer by tobacco tar painting of rabbits]; Frankfurt. Z. Path. 46 (1934) 513–522; Über die Erzeugung von Krebs durch Tabakteerpinselung beim Kaninchen . II [Production of cancer by tobacco tar painting of rabbits. II]; Frankfurt. Z. Path. 47 (1934) 52–62. 2409a. Lund, H.A.: The biosynthesis of indoleacetic acid in the styles and ovaries of tobacco preliminary to the setting of the fruit; Plant Physiol. 31 (1956) 334–339. 2410. Lyerly, L.A.: Direct vapor chromatographic determination of menthol, propylene glycol, nicotine, and triacetin in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 23, May 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965808 -5817; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and
2411.
2412.
2413.
2413a.
2414.
2415.
2416.
2417.
2418.
2419.
2420.
2421.
2422.
2423.
2424.
2425.
Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 14, 1965, p. 23; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 49–51. Lyerly, L.A.: Improved gas chromatographic determination of acetaldehyde and acrolein in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1970, No. 82, August 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614905 -4919. Lyerly, L.A. and H.L. Gilleland: Puff-by-puff analysis of nicotine and wet solids in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1966, No. 30, July 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603753 -3759. Lyerly, L.A. and H.L. Gilleland: Gas chromatographic method to determine coumarin in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1967, No. 22, August 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500968043 -8054. Lyerly, L.A. and H.L. Gilleland: Gas chromatographic determination of phenol in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1967, No. 24, August 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500968072 -8084. Lyerly, L.A. and M.E. Goodale: A gas chromatographic determination of free formic acid and acetic acid in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1969, No. 3, January 27, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500969271 -9279. Lyerly, L.A. and G.H. Greene: Determination of menthol in Salem cigarettes; RDM, 1965, No. 3, January 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602562 -2564. Lyerly, L.A. and G.H. Greene: Gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in smoke; RDM, 1976, No. 4, January 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616599 -6605. Lyerly, L.A. and G.H. Greene: Determination of nicotine in low-nicotine tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 359–361. Lyerly, L.A. and B.A. Harbin: Analytical determination of acids in tobacco smoke. Part I; RDM, 1964, No. 33, March 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602208 -2209. Lyerly, L.A., G.W. Young, and A.H. Laurene: Development of a gas chromatographic method to determine carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 2, January 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965524 -5532. Lynm, D.: Synthesis of 2,5- and 2,6-fructosazines and their deoxyfructosazines as products of sugar-ammonia reactions; R&DM, 1982, No. 54, November 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512319639 -9652. Lynm, D.: Deoxyfructosazines (DOF): A surveillance tool for scrutinization of tobacco and tobacco products; R&DM, 1984, No. 19, April 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503870041 -0082, 505109035 -9078. Lynm, D.: Radiotracer study of phenylethanol behavior in cigarettes; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 32, 1987, p. 29, see www.rjrtdocs. com 520996761 -6761; 9th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Guangzhou, China, 1988, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1988: Paper S-3, 178, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507030737 -0737; 507011748 -1752. Lynm, D. and M.F. Dube: High performance liquid chromatography method for analysis of fructosazines and deoxyfructosazines in tobacco; R&DM, 1982, No. 51, November 11. Lynm, D. and R.A. Heckman: Chemistry of ammoniated tobacco and analysis of fructosazines and deoxyfructosazines; R&DM, 1982, No. 16, April 22, see www. rjrtdocs.com 512442778 -2788. Lyons, M.J.: Tobacco smoke products. Assay for polycyclic hydrocarbons; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 33 (1955) 277–278.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1357
11/24/08 2:39:50 PM
1358
2426. Lyons, M.J.: Assay of possible carcinogenic hydrocarbons from cigarette smoke; Nature 177 (1956) 630–631. 2427. Lyons, M.J.: Presence of 1,2,3,4-dibenzpyrene in cigarette smoke; Nature 182 (1958) 178. 2428. Lyons, M.J.: Comparison of aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons from gasoline engine and diesel engine exhausts, general atmospheric dust, and cigarette smoke condensate; in: Symposium: Analysis of carcinogenic air pollutants, edited by E. Sawicki and K. Cassel, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 193–199. 2429. Lyons, M.J., J.F. Gibson, and D.J.E. Ingram: Freeradicals produced in cigarette smoke; Nature 181 (1958) 1003–1004. 2430. Lyons, M.J. and H. Johnston: Chemical analysis of the neutral fraction of cigarettes smoke tar; Brit. J. Cancer 11 (1957) 554–562. 2431. Lyons, M.J. and J.B. Spence: Studies of the unstable components of cigarette smoke; 7th Internat. Cancer Cong., London, England (1958). 2432. Lyons, M.J. and J.B. Spence: Free radicals in cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 36 (1958), 408. 2433. Lyons, M.J. and J.B. Spence: Reducing substances in cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 36 (1958) 408. 2434. Lyons, M.J. and J.B. Spence: Cigarette smoke: Composition of smoke as determined by length of cigarette smoked; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 37 (1959) 437–439. 2435. Lyons, M.J. and J.B. Spence: Environmental free radicals; Brit. J. Cancer 14 (1960) 703–708. 2435a. Macias, M.Y., W.C. Herndon, and I. Agranat: Thermodynamic properties of the arene epoxides and the relative carcinogenicities of benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[e]pyrene; Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds 3 (1993) 199–207. 2436. MacKown, C.T., B. Douglass, M.V. Djordjevic, and L.P. Bush: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine formation during processing of midrib and lamina fines; J. Agr. Food Chem. 36 (1988) 1031–1035. 2437. MacKown, C.T., F. Eivazi, J.L. Sims, and L.P. Bush: Tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines: Effect of burley alkaloid isolines and nitrogen fertilization management; J. Agr. Food Chem. 32 (1984) 1269–1272. 2438. Maga, J.A.: Potential health hazards associated with smoke; Chapter 10 in: J.A. Maga: Smoke in food processing, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1988) 113–144. 2439. Maga, J.A. and C.E. Sizer: Pyrazines in food. A review; J. Agr. Food Chem. 21 (1973) 22–30. 2440. Magee, P.N.: Natur, Entstehung und Vorkommen alkylierend wirkender Substanzen in Tabak und Tabakrauch [Nature, formation and occurrence of alkylating substances in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; in: Compounds having alkylating action, Verband der Cigarettenindustrie, Wissenschaftliche Forschungstelle (1964) 121–130. 2441. Magee, P.N.: Summary and closing remarks; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 985–988. 2441a. Magee, P.N. and J.M. Barnes: The production of malignant hepatic tumours in the rat by feeding
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2442. 2443.
2444.
2445.
2445b
2446.
2447.
2447a.
2448.
2449.
2450.
2450a.
2451.
2452.
2453.
with dimethylnitrosamine; Brit. J. Cancer 10 (1956) 114–122. Magee, P.N. and J.M. Barnes: Carcinogenic nitroso compounds; Adv. Cancer Res. 10 (1967) 163–246. Magee, P.N., R. Montesano, and R. Preussmann: Nitroso compounds and related carcinogens; in: Chemical carcinogens, 1st Edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, Am. Chem. Soc. Monograph 173 (1976) 491–625. Magin, D.F.: Gas chromatography of simple monocarbonyls in cigarette whole smoke as the benzyloxime derivatives; J. Chromatog. 202 (1980) 255–261. Magnus, H.A.: The experimental production of malignant papillomata of the lung in mice with 1:2:5:6-dibenzanthracene; J. Path. Bacteriol. 49 (1939) 21–31. Mair, C. and D. Moehring: Paper structure as a tool to affect CO diffusivity; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 63, 2006, pp. 53–54. Malaquin, A.: La nicotine dans les tabacs et leurs fumées [Nicotine in tobaccos and their smokes]; Douai (France) (1936) 1–78. Malaterre, M., J. Loheac, N. Sellier, and G. Guiochon: Analysis of the monophenolic fraction of tobacco smoke condensates by a combination of chromatographic methods; Chromatographia 8 (1975) 624–628. Manabe, S., Y. Juan, O. Wada, A. Ueki, and Y. Kanai: N-Methyl-B-carboline-3-carboxamide (FG 7142): An anxiogenic agent in cigarette smoke condensate and its mechanism of formation; Environ. Pollut. 89 (1995) 329–335. Manabe, S., K. Tohyama, O. Wada, and T. Aramaki: Detection of a carcinogen, 2-amino-1-methyl-6phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), in cigarette smoke condensate; Carcinogenesis 12 (1990) 1945–1947. Manabe, S. and O. Wada: Carcinogenic tryptophan pyrolysis products in cigarette smoke condensate and cigarette smoke-polluted air; Environ. Pollut. 64 (1990) 121–132. Manabe, S., O. Wada, and Y. Kanai: Simultaneous determination of amino-A-carbolines and amino-G-carbolines in cigarette smoke condensate by high performance liquid chromatography; J. Chromatog. Biomed. Appl. 529 (1990) 125–133. Mandagere, A.: Smoke-related N-nitroso compounds in cured meat systems; Dissertation Michigan State University (1986). Mann, J.E. Jr, P.M. Pedersen, E.S. Harlow, and H.D. Downs: A method for determining nicotine or phenol in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 34, 1964, pp. 51–53. Manning, D.L., M.P. Maskarinec, and R.W. Harvey: High performance liquid chromatographic studies of low molecular weight carbonyl compounds in tobacco smoke; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 53, 1979, p. 29; Manning, D.L., M.P. Maskarinec, R.A. Jenkins, and A.H. Marshall: High performance liquid chromatographic determination of selected gas phase carbonyls in tobacco smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 66 (1979) 8–12. Mansfield, C.T.: Analysis of free amino acids in tobacco; RDM, 1973, No. 24, October 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606198 -6209.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1358
11/24/08 2:39:50 PM
Bibliography
2454. Mansfield, C.T.: An improved method for analysis of cellulose and lignin in tobacco; RDM, 1973, No. 26, October 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606234 -6238. 2455. Mansfield, C.T.: and B.T. Hodge: Analysis of dialkylamines in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1972, No. 37, August 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615689 -5693. 2456. Mansfield, C.T., B.T. Hodge, R.B. Hege Jr, and W.C. Hamlin: Analysis of formaldehyde in tobacco smoke by high performance liquid chromatography; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 21, 1977, p. 11; J. Chromatog. Sci. 15 (1977) 301–302. 2457. Marcelet, H.: On the determination of carbon monoxide, particularly in tobacco smoke; Pharmacy Thesis No. 109, Montpelier University (1907); Bull. Soc. Chim. France 3–4 (1908) 556–558; Z. Anal. Chem. 50 (1911) 315–316. 2457a. Marchand, B., M.J. Kaiserman, and J. Fillion: Reduction of levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) in Canadian cigarettes: Where are we? 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 12, 2005, p. 25. 2457b. Marchand, B., M.J. Kaiserman, and J. Filion: Benzo[a] pyrene: Emissions from Canadian cigarettes; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 16, 2006, p. 25; Marchand, B., J. Filion, and M.J. Kaiserman: Benzo[a]pyrene: Emissions from Canadian cigarettes; Print distribution of presentation. 2458. Marchand, J. and J. Renard: Nicotine content in cigarette smoke; Papeterie 73 (1951) 263–265, 267. 2459. Margasinski, Z.: Tobacco smoke; Przemysl Chem. 16 (1932) 224–225, 250–251. 2460. Mari½-Tesarova, D., L. Tomi½, and M. Pokrajac: Research on the levels of trace elements in tobacco and their transfer to the particulate phase of smoke; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper ST16, 76. 2461. Marienfeld, C.J.: Cigarette lighting and lung cancer: A new perspective; Perspect. Biol. Med. 1974 (Autumn) 44–57. 2462. Marimore, V., D. Apostolov, and M. Laxarova: Determination of the contents of twenty microelements in tobacco by neutron activation analysis after elimination of sodium-24 and potassium-42; Chem. Abstr. 84 (1976) 132884. 2463. Markunas, P.C.: Methods for the determination of amines and amine salts; in: Handbook of analytical chemistry, 1st Edition, edited by L. Meites 12 (1963) 120–134; Methods for the determination of compounds containing other nitrogen-based functional groups; in: Handbook of analytical chemistry, 1st Edition, edited by L. Meites 12 (1963) 135–143. 2464. Marmor, R.S. and H.J. Minnemeyer: Balance studies on cigarettes containing 3-phenyl-5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazole; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975 199–203. 2465. Marriott, J.E. and A.S. Weaving: Analyses of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in the condensates of natural and synthetic smoking materials; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 39, 1977, p. 20. 2466. Marsden, E. and M.A. Collins: Alpha-particle activity and free radicals from tobacco; Nature 198 (1963) 962–964.
1359
2467. Martell, E.A.: Radioactivity of tobacco trichomes and insoluble cigarette smoke particles; Nature 249 (1974) 215–217. 2468. Martin Brinkman: Bibliography on the occurrence, determination, and properties of the following metals in tobacco and tobacco smoke: Arsenic, nickel, polonium, thorium, selenium, and others; Martin Brinkman R&D, Bremen, Germany (1973) 1–6. 2468a. Martin, F., C. Sainz-Jiminez, and F.J. Gonzales-Vila: Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of lignin; Holzforsch. 33 (1979) 210–212. 2469. Martin, I.: Paper chromatography of tobacco smoke dicarbonyl compounds as the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1958) 1439. 2470. Martin, J.M.: Quantitation of nitrogen bases in smoke; RDM, 1976, No. 13, March 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616682 -6693. 2471. Martin, J.M.: Quantitation of acetamide in tobacco; R&DM, 1981, No. 11, March 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500609319 -9326. 2472. Martin, J.M. and W.L. Clapp: Progress report on determination of N-dimethylnitrosamine in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1972, No. 45, September 12, www.rjrtdocs.com 500615765 -5769. 2473. Martin, J.M. and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Gas chromatography of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; RDM, 1968, No. 63, October 17, www.rjrtdocs.com 500604315 -4323. 2474. Martin, J.M. and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Gas chromatography of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Progress report; RDM, 1970, No. 1, January 7, www.rjrtdocs.com 500614167 -4175. 2475. Martin, J.M. and B.N. Dula: Quantitative determination of formic and acetic acids in smoke; R&DM, 1980, No. 14, April 15, www.rjrtdocs.com 500617659 -7671. 2476. Martin, J.M. and H.L. Gilleland: Quantitation of phenol in smoke; R&DM, 1980, No. 1, January 16, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500617341 -7354. 2477. Martin, J.M. and L.A. Milhous Jr: Analysis of sidestream smoke; R&DM, 1982, No. 39, August 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501660225 -0239. 2478. Martin, J.M. and F.A. Thacker Jr: Determination of tobacco flavorants piperonal, ethylvanillin, and vanillin by gas-liquid chromatography and fluorimetric thinlayer chromatography. RDR, 1970, No. 7, February 2, www.rjrtdocs.com 501000056 -0081. 2479. Martin, P., C.J. Smith, R. Garg, G.A. Long, and C. Hansch: Molecular parameters reported for a series of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 43, 2004, p. 47. 2480. Martin, P.P., S.L. Cash, and D.W. Eaker: A comparison analysis of sidestream smoke collection apparatus on quantitative determination of “tar”, benzo[a]pyrene, ammonia, and phenolic compounds: The Harris chamber vs. the BAT apparatus; R&DM, 1990, No. 285, October 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512098758 -8768. 2481. Martin, W.J., R.D. Carpenter, and R.B. Seligman: A proposed method for the analysis of glycerol in tobacco; 11th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 11, Paper No. 11, 1957, p. 8.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1359
11/24/08 2:39:50 PM
1360
2481a. Marty, I., C. Brugidou, Y. Chartier, and Y. Meyer: Growth-related gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum mesophyll protoplasts; Plant J. 4 (1993) 265–378. 2481b. Marty, I. and Y. Meyer: cDNA nucleotide sequence and expression of a tobacco cytoplasmic ribosomal protein L2 gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (1992) 1517–1522. 2481c. Martz, F., S. Maury, G. Pincon, and M. Legrand: cDNA cloning, substrate specificity and expression study of tobacco caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase, a lignin biosynthetic enzyme; Plant Mol. Biol. 36 (1998) 427–437. 2481d. Masahiro Chida, M., Y. Sone, and H. Tamura: Aroma characteristics of stored tobacco cut leaves analyzed by a high vacuum distillation and canister system; J. Agr. Food Chem. 52 (2004) 7918–7924. 2482. Maskarinec, M.P., R.W. Harvey, and J.E. Caton: Rapid quantitative determination of nicotine by high pressure liquid chromatography; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 51, 1978, p. 28. 2483. Maskarinec, M.P., D.L. Manning, and P. Oldham: Determination of vapour-phase carbonyls by high pressure liquid chromatography; J. Liq. Chromatog. 4 (1981) 31–39. 2483a. Massey, E.D.: Tobacco insect pests. B. Stored tobacco: Insects and their control; Chapter 7C in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 241–249. 2484. Massey, E.D.: Aflatoxin B1 and tobacco products; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 167–168. 2484a. Massey, E.D.: Tobacco smoke: An in vitro genotoxic perspective; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 28 (2002) 69–103. 2485. Masuda, Y., D. Hoffmann and E.L. Wynder: A-Naphthylamine and B-naphthylamine in cigarette smoke; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 22, 1968, p. 13; Masuda, Y. and D. Hoffmann: Quantitative determination of 1-naphthylamine and 2-naphthylamine in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 41 (1969) 650–652. 2486. Masuda, Y., K. More, and M. Kuratsune: Studies on bladder carcinogens in the human environment. I. Naphthylamines produced by pyrolysis of amino acids; Internat. J. Cancer 2 (1967) 489–493. 2486a. Mathews-Roth, M.M.: Antitumor activity of B-carotene, canthaxanthin, and phytoene; Oncology 39 (1982) 33–37. 2487. Mathis, D.E.: Migration and delivery of filter flavors; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 1–8. 2488. Mathur, S.P.: Estimation of nicotine in some common tobaccos and smokes; Agra Univ. J. Res. 7 (1958) 97–101. 2489. Maton, J.: The influence of manganese ions on the synthesis of ascorbic acid in the green parts of higher plants; Biol. Jaarboek Koninkl. Natuurn. Genootschap Dodonaea Gent. 14 (1947) 109–115, see Chem. Abstr. 44 (1950) 2091h. 2490. Matsueda, T., H. Hirakawa, T. Lida, Y. Kurokawa, and Y. Ohsaki: Concentration of polychlorinated dibenzop-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in cigarette smoke; Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Air Pollution (1991) 475. 2491. Matsueda, T., Y. Kurokawa, M. Nakamura, S. Takada, and K. Fukamachi: Concentrations of PCDDs, PCDFs
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2491a.
2491b.
2491c.
2492.
2493.
2494.
2495.
2496.
2497.
2498.
2499.
2500.
2501.
2502.
2503.
2504.
and coplanar PCBs in cigarettes from various countries; Organohalogen Compounds 20 (1994) 331–334. Matsukura, N., T. Kawachi, K. Morino, H. Ohgaki, T. Sugimura, and S. Takayama: Carcinogenicity in mice of mutagenic compounds from a tryptophan pyrolysate; Science 213 (1981) 346–347. Matsumoto, T., D. Yoshida, S. Mizusaki, and H. Okamoto: Mutagenic activity of the amino acid pyrolyzates in Salmonella typhimurium; Mutation Res. 48 (1977) 279–286. Matsumoto, T., D. Yoshida, S. Mizusaki, and H. Okamoto: Mutagenicities of the pyrolyzates of peptides and proteins; Mutation Res. 56 (1978) 281–288. Matsumoto, T., D. Yoshida, and H. Tomita: Determination of mutagens. A-Carbolines in grilled foods and cigarette smoke condensate; Cancer Lett. 12 (1981) 105–110. Matsushima, S., S. Ishiguro, and S. Sugawara: Composition studies on some varieties of tobacco and their smoke. I. Major components in smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1979) 31–38. Matsushima, S., S. Ishiguro, and S. Sugawara: Composition studies on some varieties of tobacco and their smoke. II. Steam-volatile components of smoke condensate; Manuscript (1979). Matsushita, H. and T. Mori: Nitrogen dioxide and nitrosamine levels in indoor air and sidestream smoke of cigarettes; in: Indoor air, Vol. 2: Radon, passive smoking, particulates and housing epidemiology, edited by B. Berglund, T. Lindvall, and J. Sundell, Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm, Sweden (1984) 335–340. Matsushita, H., T. Mori, and S. Goto: An improved method for analyzing N-nitrosamines in sidestream smoke from cigarettes and its application to Japanese and foreign cigarettes; J. Japan Soc. Air Pollut. 18 (1983) 339–345. Matsushita, H., T. Ohsumi, and S. Sugawara: Composition of trace alkaloids in tobacco leaf lamina; Agr. Biol. Chem. 47 (1983) 507–510. Matsushita, H., Y. Tsujino, D. Yoshida, A. Saito, T. Kidaki, K. Kato, and M. Noguchi: New minor alkaloids in flue-cured tobacco leaf (Nicotiana tabacum cv. BY-260–9); Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 193–194. Matthews, J.E.: An investigation of certain factors affecting the composition of cigarette smoke; Thesis, Pennsylvania State College (1941) pp. 1–77. Matthews, J.E.: Smoke technique and analysis; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 8, 1948, p. 1. Matthey, E.: Efficacité du traitement préalable du tabac par un solvent organique, du point de vue de la réduction des substances toxiques dans la fumée [Effectiveness of the preliminary treatment of tobacco with an organic solvent, from the point of view of the reduction of the toxic substances in the smoke]; Z. Präventivmed. 6 (1961) 428–443. Mattina, C.F.: A potentiometric method for the determination of hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulfide in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 113–114. Matzinger, D.F., W.W. Weeks, and E.A. Wernsman: Genetic modification of total particulate matter; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 10 (1984) 15–51. Matzinger, D.F., E.A. Wernsman, and W.W. Weeks: Genetic modification of total particulate matter in
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1360
11/24/08 2:39:50 PM
1361
Bibliography
2505.
2506.
2507.
2508.
2509.
2510.
2511.
2512.
2513.
2514.
2515.
2516.
2517.
2517a.
2517b.
tobacco smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 7, 1977, p. 4; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 138–140. Mauderly, J.L., R.K. Jones, W.C. Griffith, R.F. Henderson, and R.D. McClellan: Diesel exhaust is a pulmonary carcinogen in rats exposed chronically by inhalation; Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 9 (1987) 209–221. Mauldin, R.K.: The characterization of cigarette smoke from Cytrel® smoking product and its comparison to smoke from flue-cured tobacco. II. Semi-volatile vapor phase analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 422–429. Mauldin, R.K. and D.G. Vickroy: Use of reaction GC-MS techniques for analysis of semi-volatile smoke fractions; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 16, 1972, pp. 24–25. Mauldin, R.K. and D.G. Vickroy: Analysis of semivolatile fractions from cigarette smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 54, 1974, p. 34; A new technique for analysis of the semivolatile phase of smoke; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 71–74. Maurizi, S., S. Rossi, G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Selective extraction method of polycyclic aromatic compounds from tobacco smoke condensate and quantitative determination by HPLC-UV and fluorescence detection; 2002 CORESTA Congress, Paper ST 27. Mazzola, V., G. Rathkamp, and D. Hoffmann: N-Alkylindoles, N-alkylcarbazoles, and dibenzofurans in cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 22, 1969, p. 13; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XI. Dibenzofurans in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 183–188. Mazzulli, R.B.: Contribution to the study of the resin content of smoke from native tobaccos; Rev. Facultad Sci. Quim. (Quim. y Farm.) 25 (1950) 103–110. McCann, J. and B.N. Ames: Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73 (1976) 950–954. McCann, J., E. Choi, E. Yamasaki, and B.N. Ames: Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/ microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72 (1975) 5135–5139. McClure, W.F. and R.E. Williamson: Rapid spectrophotometric analysis of the chemical composition of tobacco. Part 3: Polyphenols; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 219–227. McConnell, B.B., K.C.T. Gordon, and T. Jones: Occupational and personal factors in the etiology of cancer of the lung; Lancet 1952(ii) 651–656. McCormick, A., M.J. Nicholson, M.A. Baylis, and J.G. Underwood: Nitrosamines in cigarette smoke condensate; Nature 244 (1973) 237–238. McCormick W.E. and M. Smith: Determination of nicotine in the air; Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal.) 18 (1946) 508–512. McCrea, J.F., R.S. Epstein, and W.H. Barry: Use of potassium tartrate for equilibrium density-gradient centrifugation of animal viruses; Nature 189 (1961) 220–221 McDaniel, R.L., K.M. Torrence, D.A. Self, and M.J. Chang: Determination of mercury in mainstream
2518.
2519.
2519a.
2519b.
2520.
2521.
2522.
2523.
2524. 2524a.
2525.
2526.
2527.
2527a.
2527b.
cigarette smoke by conventional and amalgamation cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 65, 2000, p. 56; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 267–276. McDonald, I.G.: Testimony; Blatnik Committee Hearings: False and misleading advertising (Filter-tip cigarettes); (1957) 224–240. McGlory, D.H.: The aldehyde content of cigarette smoke; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 19, 1956, p. 12. McKay, J.F., J.H. Weber, and D.K. Latham: Characterization of nitrogen bases in high-boiling petroleum distillates; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 891–898. McKee, H.C., J.W. Rhoades, J. Campbell, and A.L. Gross: Acetonitrile in body fluids related to smoking; Public Health Rep. 77 (1962) 553–554. McLaughlin, D.W.J., R.E. Bell, D.J. Graham, and R. McKeivor: Quantification of selected vapor-phase compounds using thermal desorption-gas chromatography; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 210–215. McMahon, R.E., J.C. Cline, and C.Z. Thompson: Assay of 855 test chemicals in ten tester strains using a new modification of the Ames test for bacterial mutagens; Cancer Res. 39 (1970) 682–693. McMurtrie, A. and A.B. Canon: Rapid, quantitative determination of menthol/triacetin in smoke; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 39, 1979, p. 21. McMurtrie, A., E.F. Litzinger, and D.T. Wu: Cigarette paper effects on tar/nicotine and CO/tar ratios; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 17, 1981, p. 9. McNally, W.D.: The tar in cigarette smoke and its possible effects; Am. J. Cancer 16 (1932) 1502–1514. McRae, D.D.: The physical and chemical nature of tobacco smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 16 (1990) 233–323. McRae, M.T. and J.D. Mold: The determination of low molecular weight aldehydes and ketones as the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 18, 1956, p. 12. McWilliams, D., L.J. Deutsch, and J.D. Gladden: Simple gas chromatographic determination of phenol and cresols in Cambridge pad extracts; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 37, 1986, p. 20. Meikle, R.W.: Fate of Diamidafos (phenyl N,N’dimethylphosphordiamidate) in tobacco, cured tobacco, and in smoke; J. Agr. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 746–752. Meins, F., H. Shinshi, H. C Wenzler, J. Hofsteenge, J.A. Ryals, and C. Sperisen: DNA sequences encoding polypeptides having beta-1,3-glucanase activity; U.S. Patent No. 6,632,981 (October 14, 2003). Melchers, L.S., M. Apotheker-de Groot, J.A. van der Knaap, A.S. Ponstein, M.B. Sela-Buurlage, J. F. Bol, B.J.C. Cornelissen, P.J.M. van den Elzen, and H.J.M. Linthorst: A new class of tobacco chitinases homologous to bacterial exo-chitinases displays antifungal activity; The Plant Journal 5 (1994) 469–480.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1361
11/24/08 2:39:51 PM
1362
2527c. Melikian, A.A., K. Bagheri, B.F. Goldin, and D. Hoffmann: Catechol-induced alterations in metabolic activation and binding of enantiomeric and racemic 7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrenes to DNA in mouse skin; Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 1863–1870. 2527d. Melikian, A.A., K.G. Jordan, J. Braley, J. Rigotty, C.L. Meschter, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Effects of catechol on the induction of tumors in mouse skin by 7,8dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrenes. Carcinogenesis 10 (1989) 1897–1900. 2527e. Melikian, A.A., E.J. LaVoie, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: On the enhancing effect of a bay-region methyl group in 5-methylchrysene carcinogenesis; in: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons symposium 1982, edited by M. Cooke and A.J. Dennis, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH (1983) 861–875. 2527f. Melikian, A.A., J.M. Leszczysnka, K. Bagheri, and S.S. Hecht: Effects of the cocarcinogen catechol on metabolism and DNA formation by benzo[a]pyrene in mouse skin in vivo; Carcinogenesis 7 (1987) 9–15. 2527g. Melikian, A.A., A.K. Prahalad, and D. Hoffmann: Metabolism of carbon-14 labeled catechol in mouse skin as affected by co-application of benzo[a]pyrene BAP and 7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene BAP-7,8-diol; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 31 (1990) 112. 2528. Melsens, L.H.F.: Note on nicotine; Ann. Chem. Pharm. 49/50 (1843) 353–359; Ann. Chim. Phys. 9 (1843) 465–472. 2529. Mendell, S., E.C. Bourlas, and M.Z. DeBardeleben: Factors influencing tobacco leaf quality: An investigation of the literature; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 153–167. 2530. Menden, E.E., V.J. Elia, L.W. Michael, and H.G. Petering: Distribution of cadmium and nickel of tobacco during cigarette smoking; Environ. Sci. Tech. 6 (1972) 830–832. 2530a. Mendenhall, W.L. and K. Shreeve: The effect of cigarette smoke on the tracheal cilia; J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 60 (1937) 111–112; Effect of tobacco smoke on ciliary action; J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 69 (1940) 295. 2530b. Meng, B.-Y., T. Wakasugi, and M. Sugiura: Two promoters within the psbK-psbI-trnG gene cluster in tobacco chloroplast DNA; Biomed. Life Sci. 20 (1991) 259–264. 2531. Menser, H.A., A.L.S. Cheng, and T. Sorokin, Polyphenols, phytosterols, and reducing sugars in aircured tobacco leaves injured by ozone air pollution; Tob. Sci. 21 (1977) 35–38. 2532. Menser, H.A., T. Sorokin, and M.E. Engelhaupt: The pigments, amino acids, alkaloids, growth rate, and response to ozone of a chlorophyll-deficient mutation of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 21–25. 2533. Menzie, C.A., B.B. Potocki, and J. Santodonato: Exposure to carcinogenic PAHs in the environment; Environ. Sci. Technol. 26 (1992) 1278–1284. 2534. Merker, J. and C. Pyriki: Einige Faktoren, welche die Höhe des Alkaloidgehaltes von Nicotiana tabacum L. bestimmen [Several factors which determine the level of the nicotine content of Nicotiana tabacum L.]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 7 (1960) 187–197. 2534a. Merli, F., M. Novotny, and M.L. Lee: Fractionation and gas chromatographic analysis of aza-arenes in complex mixtures; J. Chromatog. 199 (1980) 371–380. 2534b. Meshi, T., F. Motoyoshi, T. Maeda, S. Yoshiwoka, H. Watanabe, and Y. Okada: Mutations in the tobacco
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2535.
2536. 2537.
2538.
2539.
2540.
2541.
2542.
2543.
2544.
2545.
2546.
2547.
2548.
2549.
2550.
mosaic virus 30-kD protein gene overcome tm-2 resistance in tomato; The Plant Cell 1 (1989) 515–522. Michalowsky, E.H.: Comparative experiments on the influence of “Bonicot” on the nicotine content of cigar and cigarette smoke; Münch. Med. Wochnschr. 79 (1932) 827–828. Michelson, I.: Cigarettes: Polonium-210; Science 143 (1964) 917. Michelson, I. and G. Rathkamp: Composition of cigarette smoke: Effects of ammonium sulfamate in cigarette paper; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1974) 212–216. Midgett, C.H., M. Gordon, and P.C. Goodley: Modern analytical techniques for isolation and identification of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke condensate; 30th Southeastern Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Savannah, GA (1978). Miehl, H. and H. Kuhn: Different free purines in different tobacco types; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1954 (1) 14–16. Mikami, Y., N. Naito, and Y. Kaburaki; Effects of some factors on carbon monoxide concentration in the mainstream smoke of a cigarette; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 113 (1971) 99–105. Mikami, Y., Y. Saido, and Y. Kaburaki: Analytical methods of chemical components in tobacco smoke. VI. Determination of ammonia in tobacco smoke by gas chromatography; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 109 (1967) 139–142. Miller, C.W. and R.A. Lloyd Jr: Fractionation of volatile components by the Tenax®: Progress report; RDM, 1974, No. 13, May 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606545 -6555. Miller, C.W., M.P. Newell, and R.E. Shackelford: Smoke comparison. V. Vantage vs. Merit; RDR, 1976, No. 19, November 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004819 -4905. Miller, C.W., D.L. Roberts, R.A. Lloyd Jr, J.P. Dickerson, C.E. Rix, P.H. Ayers, and N.H. Nelson: Composition of flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1973, No. 10, October 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003209 -3306. Miller, C.W., M.D. Wallace, and C.R. Green: Smoke comparison studies of improved Winston candidates; RDM, 1979, No. 6, March 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500608190 -8224. Miller, E.G. Jr and J.G. Curran Jr: The selective removal of nicotine from cigarette smoke; Seminar to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. R&D Personnel (September 14, 1967) pp. 1–28. Miller, J.E.: Determination of humectants and carbonyl compounds in tobacco products by means of gas chromatography and chemical methods; CORESTA Bull. 1961(1) 105–109. Miller, J.E.: Bestimmung von Komponenten im Rauch von Pfeifentabak mit Hilfe einer neuen Pfeifenabrauchmaschine [Determination of the components in the smoke from pipe tobacco by means of a new pipe-smoking machine]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 299–304. Miller, J.E.: Determination of the components of pipe tobacco smoke by means of a new pipe-smoking machine; Proc. 3rd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Salisbury, Rhodesia, 1963 (1964) 584–595. Miller, R.L., W.L. Chamberlain, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXXIV. Pilot
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1362
11/24/08 2:39:51 PM
1363
Bibliography
2551.
2552.
2553.
2554.
2555.
2556.
2557.
2557a.
2558.
2559.
2559a.
investigations on a concentrated polynuclear hydrocarbon fraction of smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 21. Miller, R.L., W.L. Chamberlain, and R.L. Stedman: Investigation of cigarette smoke condensate neutrals strongly adsorbed on silicic acid during column chromatography; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 15, 1969, p. 10; Composition studies on tobacco. XLII. Pilot smoke condensate neutrals strongly absorbed during column chromatography; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 26–27. Miller, R.L., L. Lakritz, C.J. Dooley, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXVI. Aryl amines in the nitromethane-soluble fraction of smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 35–36. Miller, R.L. and R.L. Stedman: Essential absence of B-naphthylamine from cigarette smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 26, 1967, p. 15; Essential absence of B-naphthylamine in cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 111. Miller, R.L., E.D. Strange, and R.L. Stedman: The isolation and identification of alkylphenols and arylnitriles from a neutral subfraction of cigarette smoke condensate; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 21, 1970, p. 13; Composition studies on tobacco. XLIII. Alkylphenols and arylnitriles in a biologically active neutral subfraction of cigarette smoke condensate; Phytochemistry 10 (1971) 1135–1140. Milletti, M.: Sugli artifice in grade di diminiure la tossicita del fumo di tobacco a sulla tecnica del loro impiego. II. Metode per la determinazione dell efficacia protettive a del potera assorbante applicazione ad alcuni tipi di sigarette [On the means of diminishing the toxicity of tobacco smoke relative to ways it is generated. II. Method of determining the protective efficacy of the absorbing media (filters) of various types of cigarettes]; Chimica 35 (1959) 333–340. Mills, C.A. and M.M. Porter: Tobacco smoking habits and cancer of the mouth and respiratory system. Cancer Res. 10 (1950) 539–542. Mims, S.S.: The pyrolytic formation of polynuclear hydrocarbons. I. Exploratory study; RDR, 1961, No. 11, February 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504912565 -2587. Miner, G.S. and J.L. Sims: Changing fertilization practices and utilization of added plant nutrients for efficient production of burley and flue-cured tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 9 (1983) 4–76. Ming, W., L. Dong Z. Mingyue, X. Qialing, and W. Fang: The analysis of volatile aldehydes in mainstream smoke of cigarettes by gas chromatography; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 50, 2000, p. 47. Miranda, E.J.F., P.F.de Moura, and A.A.S. Rodrigues: A simple method of comparative analysis of cigarette mainstream smoke vapor phase by GC/MS; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 11, 2002, p. 25. Miranda, E.J.F., A.S. Saraiva, and A.A.S. Rodrigues: Identification of sidestream smoke constituents reduced by a low sidestream paper; 56th Tobacco Science
2559b.
2559c.
2560.
2561.
2562.
2562a.
2563.
2564.
2565.
2566.
2567
2568.
2569.
2570.
2571.
Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 12, 2002, pp. 25–26. Mirvish, S.S.: Effect of vitamin C and E on N-nitroso compound formation, carcinogenesis and cancer; Cancer 58 (1986) 1842–1850. Mirvish, S.S., A. Cardesa, L. Wallcave, and P. Shubik: Induction of lung adenomas by amines or ureas plus nitrite and by N-nitroso compounds: Effects of ascorbate, gallic acid, thiocyanate, and caffeine; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 55 (1975) 633–636. Misra, M., J.D. Heck, C.L. Gaworski, and N. Rajendran: Toxicologic evaluation of diammonium phosphate added to cigarette tobacco and reconstituted leaf: 13-Week smoke inhalation studies in rats; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 18, 2001, pp. 30–31. Mitacek, E.J., K.D. Brunnemann, D. Hoffmann, T. Limsila, M. Suttajit, N. Martin, and L.S. Caplan: Volatile nitrosamines and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the smoke of Thai cigarettes: A risk factor for lung cancer and a suspected risk factor for liver cancer in Thailand. Carcinogenesis; 20 (1999) 133–137. Mitchell, B.C., E.P. Barbee, and R.M. Irby Jr: The chromatographic determination of menthol in cigarettes and cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 64–66. Miura, G.A. and S.E. Mills: The conversion of D-tryptophan to L-tryptophan in cell cultures of tobacco; Plant Physiol. 47 (1971) 483–487 Miyagawa, M.: Pyrolysis of esters and saturated fatty acids. III. Pyrolysis of ethyl and isobutyl acetates; Yukagaku 18 (1969) 854–857. Miyake, T. and T. Shibamoto: Quantitative analysis by gas chromatography of volatile carbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 693 (1995) 376–381 Miyano, M., H. Matsushita, and N. Yasumatsu: N’-Isopropylnornicotine in burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 2205–2206. Miyano, M., H. Matsushita, N. Yasumatsu, and K. Nishida: New minor alkaloids in burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 1607–1608. Miyano, M., N. Yasumatsu, H. Matsushita, and K. Nishida: 1`-(6-Hydroxyoctanoyl)nicotine and 1`-(7hydroxyoctanoyl)nicotine, two new alkaloids from Japanese domestic tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1982) 1029–1032. Mizusaki, S., H. Okamoto, A. Akiyama, and Y. Fukuhara: Relation between chemical constituents of tobacco and mutagenic action of cigarette smoke condensate; Mutation Res. 48 (1977) 319–325. Mizusaki, S., T. Takashima, and K. Tomura: Factors affecting mutagenic activity of cigarette smoke condensate in Salmonella typhimurium TA 1538; Mutation Res. 48 (1977) 29–36. Moates, R.F.: Analysis of Turkish cigarette smoke; RDR, 1975, No. 5, March 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504427627 -7666; RDR, 1976, No. 2, January 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003959 -3984; Moates, R.F. and M. Senkus: The composition of smoke of Oriental tobacco; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 180–181. CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1976: Paper SO07, 95–96. Moir, J.: The composition of tobacco smoke; Proc. Chem. Metallurg. Mining Soc. (South Africa) 4 (1903/1904) 525–532.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1363
11/24/08 2:39:51 PM
1364
2572. Mokhnachev, I.G. and L.G. Astakhova: Water-soluble di- and tricarboxylic acids in tobacco smoke; Tabak (USSR) 3 (1968) 31–34. 2573. Mokhnachev, I.G. and S. Kamenshchikova: Carbonyl compounds in tobacco smoke; Prikl. Biokhimi Mikrobioler. Inst. 2 (1966) 461; Carbonyl compounds in tobacco smoke and their effect on the aroma; Sb. Nauch. Issled. Rab., Vses. Nauch. Issled. Inst. Tab. Makhorki. 155 (1970) 48–52. 2574. Mokhnachev, I.G. and S.V. Kamenshchikova: Mögliche Ausgangsstoffe von Karbonylverbindungen des Tabakrauchs [Possible precursors of carbonyl compounds in tobacco smoke]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 15 (1968) 67–81. 2575. Mokhnachev, I.G. and S.V. Kamenshchikova: Carbonyl compounds in tobacco smoke; Pizv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Pisch. Tekhnol. 2 (1968) 101–106. 2576. Mokhnachev, I.G. and I.S. Kanevcheva: I. Qualitative composition of tobacco smoke amines; Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zared. Pishch. Tekhnol. 1 (1967) 62–63. 2577. Mokhnachev, I.G. and D.N. Latayeva: Tobacco smoke phenols; Tabak (USSR) 27(2) (1966) 55–56. 2578. Mokhnachev, I.G. and D.N. Latayeva: Quantitative determination of volatile phenols of tobacco smoke; Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zared. Pishch. Tekhnol. 2 (1967) 47–49. 2579. Mokhnachev, I.G. and N.E. Mironenko: Selective filtration of components of tobacco smoke; Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zared. Pishch. Tekhnol. 4 (1980) 82–86. 2580. Mokhnachev, I.G. and V.P. Pisklov: Gas phase of tobacco smoke; Tabak (USSR) 27(4) (1966) 31–34. 2581. Mokhnachev, I.G. and V.P. Pisklov: II. Gaseous hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke; Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zared. Pishch. Tekhnol. 1 (1967a) 64–67. 2582. Mokhnachev, I.G., L.P. Popova, A.A. Sirotenko, L.A. Dulan, S.V. Kamenstchikova, V.S. Kovtunov, D.N. Latayeva, V.P. Pisklov, and L.C. Serdjuk: The gas phase of smoke and the influence of the neutral part of tobacco resin on its composition; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1040–1061. 2583. Mokhnachev, I.G., L.P. Popova, A.A. Sirotenko, L.A. Dulan, S.V. Kamenstchikova, V.S. Kovtunov, D.N. Latayeva, V.P. Pisklov, L.C. Serdjuk, and A.V. Ul’anov: Investigation of the products of tobacco resin pyrolysis; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1062–1074. 2584. Mokhnachev, I.G. and L.G. Serdjuk: Gas chromatography of organic acids in tobacco smoke; Tyutyun 18(7/8) (1969) 181–192. 2585. Mokhnachev, I.G. and N.A. Sherstyanykh: Precursors of nitrogen compounds of tobacco smoke; Tabak (USSR) 32 (1971) 28–30. 2586. Mokhnachev, I.G., A.A. Sirotenko, V.P. Pisklov, D.N. Latayeva, S.V. Kamenstchikova, N.A. Sherstyanykh, and L.G. Astachova: Composition study on tobacco smoke condensate fractions of different particle size; CORESTA Bull.: Paper B404, Page 81 (1970), see http:// legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/qbr10f00, 501029616/9637. 2587. Mola, M., S. Ciaravolo, I. Esposito, G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Optimisation of a rapid and simple method for the determination of selected aromatic amines in mainstream smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 47, 2004, p. 49.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2588. Mola, M., G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Determination of tobacco specific nitrosamines in mainstream smoke by gas chromatography-thermal energy analysis; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 10, 2003, p. 23. 2589. Mola, M., G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Microwave extraction and GC-MS determination of selected organic compounds in mainstream tobacco smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 11, 2003, pp. 23–24. 2590. Mold, J.D. and J.B. Booth: Isolation of solanesol from tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 38–39. 2591. Mold, J.D. and M.T. McRae: The determination of some low molecular weight aldehydes and ketones in cigarette smoke as the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 40–46. 2592. Mold, J.D., R.E. Means, and A.G. Kallianos: The isolation and identification of pyrocoll from cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 130–136. 2593. Mold, J.D., R.E. Means, and J.M. Ruth: The higher fatty acids of flue-cured tobacco: Methyl and cyclohexyl branched acids; Phytochemistry 5 (1966) 59–66. 2594. Mold, J.D., M.P. Peyton, R.E. Means, and T.B. Walker: Determination of catechol in cigarette smoke; Analyst 91 (1966) 189–194. 2595. Mold, J.D., R.K. Stevens, R.E. Means, and J.M. Ruth: The paraffin hydrocarbons of tobacco: Normal-, iso- and anteiso- homologs; Biochem. 2 (1963) 605–610. 2596. Mold, J.D. and T.B. Walker: Isolation of TDE from cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 161–163. 2596a. Mold, J.D., T.B. Walker, and L.G. Veasey: Selective separation of polycyclic aromatic compounds by countercurrent distribution with a solvent system containing tetramethyluric acid; Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 2071–2074. 2597. Mold, J.D., T.B. Walker, and J.B. Williams: Alloöcimene: Absence in cigarette smoke; Science 144 (1964) 1572–1573. 2597a. Moldoveanu, S.C.: Analysis of protein amino acids in tobacco using microwave digestion of plant material; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 50, 2005, pp. 45–46; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 451–465. 2598 Moldoveanu, S.C. and M. Kiser: Gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry versus liquid chromatography/fluorescence detection in the analysis of phenols in mainstream cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 1141 (2007) 90–97. 2599. Moldoveanu, S.C., N.P. Kulshreshtha, and J.M. Wilkins: Study of the pyrosynthesis of NNN and NNK in mainstream cigarette smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 60, 2001, p. 55. 2600. Moldoveanu, S.C., J.L. Roles, and Q. Zha: Study of the volatile compounds from tobacco using steam distillation-solvent extraction and other extraction techniques; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 42, 1996, pp. 44–45. 2601. Moldoveanu, S.C., T.A. Sasaki, and J.B. Forehand: Quantitation of two heterocyclic amines in cigarette smoke using a new NCI GC/MS technique; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 52, 2000, p. 48.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1364
11/24/08 2:39:51 PM
Bibliography
2601a. Moldoveanu, S.C. and F.K. St. Charles: Differences in the chemical composition of the particulate phase of inhaled and exhaled mainstream cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2007) 290–302. 2601b. Moldoveanu, S.C., J.W. Wilkins, and W.M. Coleman III: Evaluation of the retention by humans of several cigarette smoke constituents; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 58, 2006, p. 51. 2602. Moldoveanu, S.C. and Q. Zha: Comparison of the chemical composition of smoke from a commercial cigarette at three moisture levels; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 13, 2000, p. 24. 2603. Molinari, E.: Über den Einfluß der Luftfeuchtigkeit auf den Nikotingehalt des Tabakrauches [The influence of atmospheric moisture on the nicotine content of tobacco smoke]; Fachliche. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1932 (2) 4–7. 2604. Molinari, E.: The aldehydes and ketones in tobacco smoke; Fachliche. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1933(2) 23–25. 2605. Molinari, E.: Über das Auftreten von Phenolen im Tabakrauch [The occurrence of phenols in tobacco smoke]; Fachliche. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1936(3) 14–16. 2606. Molinari, E.: Über Stickstoffkörper des Tabaks und Tabakrauches [The nitrogen compounds of tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Fachliche. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1938(3) 12–15. 2607. Molinari, E.: Austria and the science of tobacco; Rev. Internat. Tab. 25 (1950) 195, see Chem. Abstr. 45 (1951) 3126g. 2608. Molnar, I.: Chemical examination of tobacco smoke; Budapest (1882). 2609. Monnet, R. and O. DuPont: L’arsenic dans les tabacs d’Algérie: Tabacs à fumer et à macher [Arsenic in Algerian tobaccos: Tobaccos to smoke and to chew]; Bull. Algérien Cancer 6(17) (1953) 19–24. 2610. Monod, R. and O. DuPont: Analyse de la fumée des cigarettes. Application à la mesure de l’efficacité des filters [Analysis of cigarette smoke. Application to the measurement of filter efficiency]; Baumgartner Papers (Switzerland) (1959) pp. 1–29. 2610a. Monticello, T.M. and K.T. Morgan: Cell proliferation and formaldehyde-induced respiratory carcinogenesis; Risk Analysis 14 (1994) 313–319. 2611. Mookherjee, B.D. and R.A. Wilson: Tobacco constituents: Their importance in flavor and fragrance chemistry; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 14 (1988) 114–168. 2612. Moore, G.E. and F.G. Bock: “Tar” and nicotine levels of American cigarettes; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 89–94. 2613. Moore, G.E., I. Bross, R. Shamberger, and F.G. Bock: Tar and nicotine retrieval from fifty-six brands of cigarettes; Cancer 20 (1967) 323–332. 2614. Moore, N.H., B.D. McVeety, B.B. Westerberg, F.S. Hsu, and J. Whidby: Quantitation of benzo[a]pyrene from mainstream smoke by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 49, 1999, p. 47. 2614a. Moreau, R.A. and C.L. Preisig: Lipid changes in tobacco cell suspensions following treatment with cellulase elicitor; Physiologia Plantarum 87 (1993) 7–13.
1365
2615. Morée-Testa, P.: Liquid chromatographic determination of diphenols: Hydroquinone and catechol; Ann. Tabac SEITA 18 (1981) 67–74. 2616. Morée-Testa, P. and Y. Saint-Jalm: Determination of A-dicarbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 217 (1981) 197–208. 2617. Morgan, J.P., D. Fountain, D. Mereand, and C. Williard: A quick and easy TSNA analysis for NNN, NAT, NAB, and NNK in mainstream cigarette smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 38, 2002, p. 42. 2618. Morgan, W.T., J.B. Reece, C.H. Risner. C.B. Bennett, C.H. Midgett, K.S. Johnson, and H.R. Burton: A collaborative study for the determination of tobacco specific nitrosamines in tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 192–203. 2618a. Mori, M. and K. Kato: An arabinoglucuronomannan from suspension-cultured cells of Nicotiana tabacum, Carbohydrate Res. 91 (1981) 49–58. 2619. Morie, G.P.: A method for determination of acetic acid and higher aliphatic acids in cigarette smoke; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 13, 1970, p. 9. 2620. Morie, G.P.: Selective filtration of tobacco smoke components. A review; Tennessee Eastman Co. Publ. No. FTR-50 (1970). 2621. Morie, G.P.: Determination of hydrogen sulfide in cigarette smoke with a sulfide ion electrode; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 107. 2622. Morie, G.P.: Fraction of protonated and unprotonated nicotine in tobacco smoke at various pH values; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 167. 2623. Morie, G.P.: Method for the rapid determination of acetic acid and higher acids in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 173–177. 2624. Morie, G.P.: The use of Carbosieve-B chromatography packing for the determination of CO and CO2 in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 125–126. 2625. Morie, G.P.: Evaluation of free-radical traps for the removal of nitrogen oxides from cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 80–81. 2626. Morie, G.P.: Some factors that affect the diffusion of carbon monoxide out of cigarettes. Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 167–169. 2627. Morie, G.P.: Use of ion-selective electrodes in tobacco smoke analysis. A review; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 19–22. 2628. Morie, G.P.: Selective filtration of tobacco smoke components: A review; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 553–583. 2629. Morie, G.P. and M.S. Baggett: Capillary gas chromatography for studies of selective filtration; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 1 (1975) 31–50. 2630. Morie, G.P. and M.S. Baggett: Method for the determination of particle size distribution of certain smoke components; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 13, 1976, p. 15; Observations on the distribution of certain tobacco smoke components with respect to particle size; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 202–203; CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1976: Paper ST02, 124–125; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 72–78.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1365
11/24/08 2:39:51 PM
1366
2631. Morie, G.P. and M.S. Baggett: Evaluation of a photoionization detector for gas chromatographic analyses of cigarette smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 38, 1977, p. 20. 2632. Morie, G.P. and M.S. Baggett: Effect of filter ventilation on some physical and chemical properties of cigarette smoke; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S09, 117–118. 2633. Morie, G.P. and P.E. Morrisett: Determination of transition metals in cigarette smoke condensate by solvent extraction and atomic absorption spectroscopy; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1974) 302–304. 2634. Morie, G.P. and C.H. Sloan: The use of cryogenic temperature gas chromatography for the determination of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 178–181. 2635. Morie, G.P. and C.H. Sloan: Determination of N-nitrosodimethylamine in the smoke of high-nitrate tobacco cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 61–66. 2636. Morie, G.P., C.H. Sloan, and M.S. Baggett: Parameters affecting the selective filtration of certain tobacco smoke components; CORESTA 1974 Symp., Montreux, Switzerland (1974); Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1974) 145–149. 2637. Morin, A., J. Dumont, A. Porter, and P. Dunn: Relationship between tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA) and microbial population from Ontario-grown tobacco flue-cured under direct and indirect methods; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper No. ST4. 2638. Morin, A., A. Porter, A. Ratavicius, and J. Joly: Evaluation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines and microbial populations during flue-curing of tobacco under direct and indirect heating; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 40–46. 2639. Morris, R.M.: The determination of silicon in cured tobacco leaf by atomic absorption spectrophotometry; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 117–118. 2640. Morrison, C.C. and F.W. Best: The distribution of radioactivity in the smoke from L-19112-C cigarettes injected one-half their rod length with 14C-vanillin; R&DM, 1984, No. 20, March 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505109079 -9087. 2641. Morrison, C.C., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: Distribution of radioactivity in the smoke from PD00065A cigarettes injected one-half their rod length with 14C-phenylacetic acid. R&DM, 1985, No. 12, February 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511869032 -9040; 511869041 -9050. 2642. Morrison, C.C., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: A comparison of paper streaking and tobacco rod injection methods for phenylacetic acid addition to cigarettes; R&DM, 1986, No. 42, April 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504925399 -5408. 2643. Morrison, C.C., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: The distribution of radioactivity in the smoke from PD00065A cigarettes injected one-half their rod length with 14Cphenylacetic acid; R&DM, 1986, No. 43, April 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504925409 -5419. 2644. Morrison, C.C., T.J. Clark, R.A. Vernon, and M.F. Borgerding: Quantitative analysis of selected cigarette smoking components using gas chromatography diode array ultraviolet spectrophotometry; 52nd Tobacco
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2645.
2646.
2647.
2647a.
2648.
2649.
2650.
2650a.
2650b.
2651.
2652.
2653.
Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 25, 1998, p. 27. Morrison, C.C., D.E. Wingate, K.A. Beard, L.S. Winkler, D.F. Simmons, J.C. Rogers, and M.F. Borgerding: The effects of cigarette design modifications on selected mainstream vapor phase smoke constituent yields; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 44, 1995, p. 44. Mosby, M.: Effects of nitrate concentration on the chemical constituents of tobacco smoke; Inter-office Memo PM (July 19, 1982), pp. 1–13, see http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu 2024849911/9923. Moseley, J.M. and C.H. Rayburn: Nornicotine-type alkaloids as a factor in the taste and composition of cigarette smoke; 11th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 11, Paper No. 3, 1957, p. 9. Moshy, R.J. and H.M. Halter: Reconstituted-tobaccoleaf technology: A tool for tobacco-smoke modification; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 133–148. Mouron, J.-C., J. Bonnet, and S. Neukomm: Extraction of tobacco by some organic solvents and consequences on chemical composition of the smoke; Oncologia 13 (1960) 271–278. Mouron, J.-C., J. Bonnet, and S. Neukomm: Variations de la composition chimique de la fumée du tabac par l’addition de produites purs à du tabac complètement extrait [Variations in the chemical composition of the smoke from tobacco by addition of pure products to completely extracted tobacco]; Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 67 (1961) 447–453. Muel, B. and G. LaCroix: Caractérisation et dosage du 3–4 benzopyrène par spectrophotométrie de luminescence à 190°C [Characterization and level of 3,4-benzpyrene by luminescence spectrophotometry at -190°C]; Bull. Soc. Chim. France (1960) 2139–2147. Mueller, L.: Approaches and tools for the management of pesticide residues on tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 31 (2005) 23–39. Mueller, L. and M.R. Ward: Tobacco insect pests. C. Pesticide regulations and their impact on crop protection strategies (Minimization of pesticide residues); Chapter 7C in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 250–264. Müller, K.H., G. Neurath, and H. Horstmann: Effect of air permeability of cigarette paper on the yield and composition of smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 271–281. Müller, R. and W. Moldenhauer: Eine vereinfache Methoden zur Adsorption des Nikotins im Nebenstromrauch von Zigarette [A simplified method for the absorption of nicotine from cigarette sidestream smoke]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 6 (1959) 265–277. Müller, R. and W. Moldenhauer: Untersuchungen über den Einfluss der Länge von Zigarettenfiltern auf die Adsorptionswirkung an Nikotin, wasserfreiem Rauchkondensate und Phenolen [Investigations on the influence of the length of cigarette filters on their efficiency for absorbing nicotine, anhydrous smoke
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1366
11/24/08 2:39:51 PM
Bibliography
2654.
2655.
2656.
2657. 2658.
2659.
2659a.
2660.
2661.
2662.
2663.
2663a.
2663b.
condensate, and phenols]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 13 (1966) 146; Studies on the influence of the length of cigarette filters on their efficiency for absorbing nicotine, anhydrous smoke condensate, and phenols; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 880–885. Müller R, W. Moldenhauer, and P. Schlemmer: Erfahrung bei der quantitativen Bestimmung von polyzyklischen Kohlenwasserstoffen im Tabakrauch [On the quantitative estimation of polycyclic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 14 (1967) 159. Müller R, W. Moldenhauer, and P. Schlemmer: Über die Verminderung gesundheitsschädigender Inhaltsstoffe des Tabakrauches [On decreasing of the adverse health components of tobacco smoke]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 15 (1968) 124–190. Müller R, W. Moldenhauer, and P. Schlemmer: Überprüfung von Möglichkeiten zur selektiven Adsorption von gesundheitsschädigenden Inhaltsstoffen des Tabakrauches an Zigarettenfiltern aus Zellstoff [A review of the possibility of selective adsorption of the adverse health components in tobacco smoke by cellulose cigarette filters]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 18 (1971) 53–65. Mulvany, D.K.: Radioactivity of tobacco and lung cancer; Lancet 1954 (i) 980. Mumpower, R.C. and J.E. Kiefer: Some factors that affect the filtration of nicotine from cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 34, 1966, p. 45; Tob. Sci. 11 (1966) 144–147. Mumpower, R.C., J.S. Lewis, and G.P. Touey: Determination of carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 26, 1961, p. 12; Tob. Sci. 6 (1961) 142–145. Mungur, R., A.D.M. Glass, D.B. Goodenow, and D.A. Lightfoot: Metabolite fingerprinting in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum altered by the Escherichia coli glutamate dehydrogenase gene; J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2 (2005) 198–214. Munson, J.W. and H. Abdine: Determination of N’-nitrosonornicotine in tobacco by gas chromatography; Anal. Lett. 10 (1977) 777–786. Murai, A., M. Ono, and T. Masamune: Structure revision of “1-keto A -cyperone”, a sesquiterpene isolated from tobacco; Chem. Lett. (1978) 1005. Muramatsu, M., T. Mikami, N. Naito, and H. Tomita: A model study of the diffusion and dilution of low molecular weight gaseous components through cigarette paper during smoking; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 141–146. Muranaga, T., M. Kusama, T. Tsugane, and T. Kurosawa: Relation between chemical composition and smoking quality of Japanese flue-cured tobacco; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 295–297. Murata, N.: DNA sequence encoding glycerol 3-phosphate acyltransferase; U.S. Patent No. 5,210,189 (May 11, 1993). Mussalo-Rauhamaa, H. and T. Jaakkola: Plutonium 239, 240Pu and 210Po contents of tobacco and cigarette smoke; Health Phys. 49 (1985) 296–301.
1367
2664. Muto, H. and Y. Takazawa: Dioxins in cigarette smoke; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 44 (1989) 171–174. 2665. Mylonas, V.A.: Nutrient concentration changes in oriental Kabakulak tobacco during the growing season; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 147–152. 2665a. Mylonas, V.A. and C. B. McCants: Effects of humic and fulvic acids on growth of tobacco. I. Root initiation and elongation; Plant and Soil 54 (1980) 485–490. 2666. Nadkarni, R.A.: Some considerations of metal content of tobacco products; Chem. Ind. 1974 (17) 693–696. 2667. Nadkarni, R.A., W.D. Ehmann, and D. Burdick: Investigations of the relative transference of trace elements from cigarette tobacco into smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 37–39. 2667a. Nagao, M., Y. Fujita, K. Wakabayashi, and T. Sugimura: Ultimate forms of mutagenic and carcinogenic heterocyclic amines produced by pyrolysis; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 114 (1983) 626–631. 2667b. Nagao, M., M. Honda, Y. Seino, T. Yahagi, T. Kawachi, and T. Sugimura: Mutagenicities of protein pyrolysates; Cancer Lett. 2 (1977) 335–340. 2667c. Nagao, M., M. Honda, Y. Seino, T. Yahagi, and T. Sugimura: Mutagenicities of smoke condensates and the charred surface of fish and meat; Cancer Lett. 2 (1977) 221–226. 2667d. Nagao, M., Y. Suwa, H. Yoshizumi, and T. Sugimura: Mutagens in coffee; in: Coffee and health, edited by B. MacMahon and T. Sugimura, Banbury Report 17, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1985) 69–77. 2667e. Nagao, M., Y. Takahashi, H. Yamanaka, and T. Sugimura: Mutagens in coffee and tea; Mutation Res. 68 (1979) 101–106. 2667f. Nagao, M., T. Yahagi, T. Kawachi, Y. Seino, M. Honda, N. Matsukura, T. Sugimura, K. Wakabayashi, K. Tsuji, and T. Kosuge: Mutagens in foods, and especially pyrolysis products of protein; in: Progress in genetic toxicology, edited by D. Scott, B.A. Bridges, and F.H. Sobels, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1977) 259; On mutagens in food, especially on compounds from pyrolysis of proteins; Mutation Res. 53 (1978) 239. 2667g. Nagao, M., T. Yahagi, M. Honda, Y. Seino, T. Matsushima, and T. Sugimura.: Demonstration of mutagenicity of aniline and o-toluidine by norharman; Proc. Japan Acad. 53B (1977) 34–37. 2668. Naghski, J.: Analytical methods: Progress on the separation of nicotine oxidation products; 4th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 4, Paper No. 5, 1950, p. 1. 2669. Nagy, V.L.: Microdetermination of nicotine in tobacco smoke; Biochem. Z. 249 (1932) 404–408. 2670. Nagy, V.L.: How much nicotine gets into cigarette smoke? Biochem. Z. 254 (1932) 94–96. 2671 Nagy, V.L.: Mikrobestimmung der Tabakrauch-Alkalität [Microdetermination of tobacco smoke alkalinity]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 79 (1938) 505–508. 2672. Nagy, V.L. and L. Barta: Über den Nikotingehalt des Zigarren- und Pfeifenrauchs [Nicotine content of cigar and pipe smoke]; Angew. Chem. 47 (1934) 214–215. 2673. Nagy, V.L. and S. Dickmann: Volumetrische Bestimmung kleinster Nkotinmengen [Volumetric determination of very small amounts of nicotine]; Magy. Gyog. Tarsasag Ertesit. 9 (1933) 210-215; Z. Anal. Chem. 94 (1933) 12–17. 2674. Nair, J., S.S. Pakhale, and S.V. Bhide: Carcinogenic tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in Indian tobacco products; Food Chem. Toxicol. 27 (1989) 751–753.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1367
11/24/08 2:39:52 PM
1368
2675. Nakagawa, Y., C.H. Yang, and S.H. Wender: Identification of quinide in cigarette smoke; J. Org. Chem. 26 (1961) 3017–3019. 2675a. Nakajima, H., T. Yokota, T. Matsumoto, M. Noguchi, and N. Takahashi: Relationship between hormone content and autonomy in various autonomous tobacco cells cultured in suspension; Plant Cell Physiol. 20 (1979) 1489–1499. 2676. Nakayama, T., M. Kaneko, and M. Kodama: Volatile gas components contribute to cigarette-smoke-induced DNA single strand breaks in cultured human cells; Agr. Biol. Chem. 50 (1986) 1319–1320. 2677. Nakayama, T., M. Kodama, and C. Nagata: Generation of hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion radical from cigarette smoke; Gann 75 (1985) 95–98. 2678. Nakayasu, M., F. Makasato, H. Sakamoto, M. Terada, and T. Sugimura: Mutagenic activity of norharman and harman in Chinese hamster lung cells in assays with diphtheria toxin resistance as marker; Cancer Lett. 17 (1983) 249–255. 2679. Nall, J.F.: Complexed cyanide in collected cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 21, 1966, pp. 25–27. 2680. Nandi M, D. Slone, H. Jick, S. Shapiro, and G.P. Lewis: Cadmium content of cigarettes. Lancet 1969(ii) 1329–1330. 2681. Nanni, E.J., M.E. Lovette, R.D. Hicks, K.W. Fowler, and M.F. Borgerding: Separation and quantitation of phenolic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke by capillary GC/MSD/SIM; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 58, 1988, p. 46; 196th Ann. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Los Angeles, CA (1988); Separation and quantitation of phenolic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke by capillary gas chromatography with mass spectrometry in the selected-ion mode; J. Chromatog. 505 (1990) 365–374. 2681a. Nanni, E.J., M.E. Lovette, R.D. Hicks, K.W. Fowler, and M.F. Borgerding: Separation and quantitation of monovalent anionic and cationic species in mainstream cigarette smoke aerosols by high-performance ion chromatography; J. Chromatog. Sci. 28 (1990) 432–436. 2682. Narasimha Rao, C.V. and M.K. Chakraborty: Variations in solanesol levels among tobacco stalk positions, growth stages and air curing; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 60–61. 2683. National Cancer Institute: Report No. 5. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. Summary: Skin painting bioassays using condensate from experimental cigarettes; DHEW Publ. (NIH) (September, 1980). 2683a. National Cancer Institute: Formaldehyde; (1994), see www.graylab.ac.uk/cancer/600038.html. 2684. National Research Council: Tobacco smoke; in: Indoor pollutants, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1986) 149–168. 2685. National Research Council: Environmental tobacco smoke. Measuring exposures and assessing health effects; National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1986). 2686. National Technical Information Service (NTIS): Third annual report on carcinogens; National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC (1982). 2687. Neal, J. and R.H. Rigdon: Gastric tumors in mice fed benzo[a]pyrene. A quantitative study; Texas Rpt. Biol. Med. 25 (1967) 553–557. 2687a. Neale, A.D., J. A. Wahleithner, M. Lund, H.T. Bonnett, A. Kelly, D. Ry Meeks-Wagner, W. J. Peacock, and
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2688.
2688a.
2689.
2689a.
2689b. 2689c.
2689d.
2690.
2691.
2692.
2693.
2694.
2695.
E.S. Dennisa: Chitinase, B-1,3-glucanase, osmotin, and extensin are expressed in tobacco explants during flower formation; The Plant Cell 2 (1990) 673–684. Neas, I., G.W. Brown, J.P. Dickerson, R.M. Henderson, W.B. James, W.B. Line, and H.C. Threat Jr: Evaluation of once-over low-profile harvested tobacco: Part I. Processing and leaf analysis; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 59–63; Part II. Smoke chemistry and smoking panel evaluation; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 67–70. Nebert, D.W., S.W. Bigelow, A.B. Okey, T. Yahagi, Y. Mori, M. Nagao, and T. Sugimura: Pyrolysis products from amino acids and proteins: Highest mutagenicity requires cytochrome P1–450; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76 (1979) 5929–5933. Neel, R.M.: Vapor-phase removal of nicotine from burley tobacco in pilot plant and plant-scale commercial equipment; RDR, 1961, No. 58, December 27, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500937739 -7780. Negishi, T. and H. Hayatsu: The enhancing effect of cysteine and its derivatives on the mutagenic activities of the tryptophan pyrolysis products, Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 88 (1979) 97–102. Neish, W.J.P.: Solubilization of aromatic amines by purines; Rec. Trav. Chim. 67 (1948) 361–373. Nelson, D.R. and D.R. Sukkestad: Normal and branched aliphatic hydrocarbons from the eggs of the tobacco hornworm; Biochemistry 9 (1970) 4601–4611. Nelson, N., L. Orris, and B.L. Van Duuren: Unpublished data cited in Van Duuren, B.L., J.A. Bilbao, and C.A. Joseph: The carcinogenic heterocyclics in cigarette-smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 25 (1960) 53–61. Nelson, P.R. and F.W. Conrad Jr: Interaction of environmental tobacco smoke components with a ventilation system; Tob. Sci. 41 (1997) 45–52. Nelson, P.R., F.W. Conrad Jr, S.P. Kelly, K.C. Maiolo, J.D. Richardson, and M.W. Ogden: Composition of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) from international cigarettes. Part II. Nine country follow-up; Environ. Int. 24 (1998) 251–257. Nelson, P.R., F.W. Conrad Jr, S.P. Kelly, and C.H. Risner: Quantitative comparison of ETS generated by different cigarettes. Part 2: Effect of relative humidity on ETS composition; in: Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Indoor Air, 4 (1996) 27–32. Organizing Committee of 7th Internat. Conf. Indoor Air Quality and Climate (Tokyo). Nelson, P.R., F.W. Conrad Jr, S.P. Kelly, C.H. Risner, D.L. Heavner, and M.W. Ogden: A method for the comparative evaluation of ETS generated by different cigarettes and its application to a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 26, 1995, p. 32. Nelson, P.R., D.L. Heavner, and B.B. Collie: Characterization of environmental tobacco smoke generated by different cigarettes; in: Present and future of indoor air quality, edited by C.J. Bieva, Y. Courtois, and M. Govaerts, Elsevier Science Publishers, Biomedical Division (1989) 277–282. Nelson, P.R., S.P. Kelly, F.W. Conrad Jr, and C.H. Risner: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) composition at different relative humidities; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 25, 1996, pp. 25–26.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1368
11/24/08 2:39:52 PM
Bibliography
2696. Nemeth, L.: Classification of cigarette tobaccos and tobacco products on the basis of smoke analysis; Dohanyipar 7 (1959) 134–137. 2697. Nesemann, E., R. Schröder, and F. Seehofer: Methoden zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Insektiziden in Tabak and Tabakrauch. I. Zur Bestimmung von Organo-ChlorInsektiziden [Methods for the quantitative determination of insecticides in tobacco and tobacco smoke. I. The estimation of organochlorine insecticides]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 182–188. 2698. Nesemann, E., R. Schröder, and F. Seehofer: Methoden zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Insektiziden in Tabak und Tabakrauch. II. Mitteilung: Zur Bestimmung von Carbamat-Insektiziden [Methods for the quantitative determination of insecticides in tobacco and tobacco smoke. II. Estimation of carbamate insecticides]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 197–200. 2699. Nesemann, E. and F. Seehofer: Zur Bestimmung von Tabakadditiven. 1. Mitteilung: Eine Methode zur qualitativen und quantitativen Bestimmung von Vanillin, Äthylvanillin, Cumarin und Dihydrocumarin in Tabak und Tabakerzeugnissen [Determination of tobacco additives. 1. A method for qualitative and quantitative determination of vanillin, ethylvanillin, coumarin, and dihydrocoumarin in tobacco and tobacco products]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 290–294. 2699a. Nesnow, S., L.L. Triplett, and T.J. Slaga: Studies on the tumor initiating, tumor promoting, and tumor co-initiating properties of respiratory carcinogens; Carcinogenesis 8 (1985) 257–277. 2700. Nestor, T.B., J.S. Gentry, D.M. Peele, M.G. Riddick, B.T. Conner, and M.E. Edwards: Role of oxides of nitrogen in tobacco-specific nitrosamine formation in flue-cured tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 467–475. 2701. Neton, W. and S.A. Ibrahm: Alpha-emitting radionuclides in cigarette tobacco; 23rd Ann. Mtg., Hlth. Physics Soc., see Hlth. Phys. 35 (1978) 922–923. 2702. Neuberg, C. and J. Burkard: Über neue stickstofffreie Bestandteile des Tabakrauches [Some new nitrogen-free components of tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 243 (1931) 472-484, see Chem. Abstr. 26 (1932) 2012. 2702a. Neuberg, C. and M. Kobel: Formaldehyd im Tabakrauch [Formaldehyde in tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 179 (1926) 459. 2703. Neuberg, C. and M. Kobel: Isolierung von Methylalkohol aus Tabakrauch [Isolation of methanol from tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 206 (1929) 240–244. 2704. Neuberg, C. and M. Kobel: Über Bildung von Diketonen aus Bestandteilen des Tabaks [On the formation of diketones from tobacco components]; Biochem. Z. 275 (1935) 339–343, see Chem. Abstr. 29 (1935) 2511. 2704a. Neuberg, C. and M. Kobel: Über die Isolierung von Rutin aus Tabak [Isolation of rutin from tobacco]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 72 (1936) 113–116. 2705. Neuberg, C. and M. Kobel: Über die Isolierung von Sorbit aus Tabak [Isolation of sorbitol from tobacco]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 72 (1936) 116–121. 2706. Neuberg, C. and B. Ottenstein: Übertritt von Methylalkohol in den Tabakrauch [Appearance of methanol in tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 188 (1927) 217–226, see Chem. Abstr. 22 (1928) 666. 2707. Neukomm, S.: Experimental studies on the carcinogenic power of tobacco smoke and other contaminants of the atmosphere; Oncologia 10 (1957) 137–155.
1369
2708. Neukomm, S.: The newt test in relation to investigations on carcinogenic substances; in: Symposium: Analysis of carcinogenic air pollutants, edited by E. Sawicki and K. Cassels Jr, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 71–73. 2709. Neukomm, S.: Cocarcinogenic action of various fractions of tobacco smoke; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 18 (1962) 33–36. 2710. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Untersuchungen über cancerogene Stoffe im Tabakrauch [Investigation of carcinogenic substances in tobacco smoke]; StrahlenTherapie 37 (Suppl.) (1957) 128–132. 2711. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Carcinogenic and cocarcinogenic substances in tobacco smoke; 7th Internat. Cancer Cong., London, England (1958). 2712. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Carcinogenic and cocarcinogenic substances in tobacco smoke; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 561–563. 2713. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Perfectionnements dans le traitement du Tabac [Improvements in the treatment of tobacco]; French Patent No. 1,205,390 (February 2, 1960). 2714. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Procédé de traitement du tabac ayant pour but de modifier le procès de la combustion [Method of treatment of tobacco having as its goal the modification of the combustion process]; French Patent No. 1,219,880 (May 20, 1960). 2715. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: On the combustion of organic material and origin of carcinogenic substances in tobacco and in food; Oncologia 13 (1960b) 266–271. 2716. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Tobacco process and product; U.S. Patent No. 3,039,475 (1962). 2717. Neukomm, S. and J. Bonnet: Process for treating tobacco and tobacco obtained by said process; U.S. Patent No. 3,096,773 (July 9, 1963). 2718. Neukomm, S., J. Bonnet, and M. de Trey: Action pathogène des polymères bruns isolés de la fumée du tabac [Pathogenic activity of the brown polymers isolated from tobacco smoke]; Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 67 (1961) 433–446. 2719. Neurath, G.: Piègeage de la fumée secondaire de la cigarette [Collection of cigarette sidestream smoke]; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1964 (2) 314. 2720. Neurath. G.: Zur Definition der Selektivitätserscheinungen [On the definition of selectivity factors]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 223–224. 2721. Neurath, G.: On the water contents of main- and sidestream smokes; CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Les Rasses, Switzerland (1966). 2722. Neurath, G.: Tobacco products and smoke; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 743–760; Tobacco products and smoke. General report; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1967) 1–17. 2723. Neurath, G.: Zur Frage des Vorkommen von N-Nitrosoverbindungen in Tabakrauch [On the question of the occurrence of N-nitroso compounds in tobacco smoke]; Experientia 23 (1967) 400–404. 2724. Neurath, G.: Stickstoffverbindungen des Tabakrauches [Nitrogen compounds in tobacco smoke]; Arzneimittelforschung 19 (1969) 1093–1106; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 115–133. 2725. Neurath, G.: Nitrosamine formation from precursors in tobacco smoke; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Publ. No. 3 (1972) 134–136. 2726. Neurath, G.: Zur Chemie biologische aktive Inhaltstoffe von Tabak und Tabakrauch [On the chemistry of the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1369
11/24/08 2:39:52 PM
1370
2727.
2728.
2729.
2730.
2731.
2732.
2733.
2734.
2735.
2736.
2737.
2738.
2739.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
biologically active components of tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Planta Med. 22 (1972) 267–280. Neurath, G.: Recent advances in knowledge of chemical composition of tobacco smoke; in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972) pp. 77–97. Neurath, G.: N-Nitroso Verbindungen in Tabak und Tabakrauch [N-Nitroso compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; in: Nitrosamin-problem, Berlin Abschluss-Kolloqium (1983) 65–71. Neurath, G. and E. Doerk: Identifizierung und quantitative Bestimmung einzelner primärer und sekundärer Amine aus Gemischen als 4’-Nitroazobenzolcarbonsaure-4-amide (NABSA): Anwendung auf Tabak und Rauch [Identification and quantitative estimation of several primary and secondary amines in a mixture as nitroazobenzoic acid-4-amides (NABSA): Use on tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie, Hamburg, Germany (1964) 101–103. Neurath, G. and M. Dünger: Darstellung und Eigenschaften von N-Nitrosoverbindungen der Tabakalkaloide [Preparation and properties of N-nitroso derivatives of tobacco alkaloids]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 339–345. Neurath, G. and M. Dünger: Semi-volatiles of tobacco smoke; CORESTA Bull. 3. 1970, see CORESTA 5th International Tobacco Scientific Congress, Hamburg, 1970, B217; see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ sbv69d00 500615123/5140. Neurath, G. and M. Dünger: Isolierung schwach basischer Heteroaromaten aus dem Tabakrauch [The isolation of weak heteroaromatic bases in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 1–4. Neurath, G. and M. Dünger: Measurement of the nitrogen oxides in tobacco smoke by means of the chemiluminescence method; Manuscript, August 30, 1973, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501550599 -0605. Neurath G, M. Dünger, J. Gewe, W. Lüttich, and H. Wichern: Volatile bases of tobacco smoke; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1011–1018; Neurath, G., M. Dünger, J. Gewe, W. Lüttich, A. Krull, B. Pirmann, and W. Wandrey: Untersuchung der flüchtigen Basen des Tabakrauches [Investigation of volatile bases in cigarette smoke]. Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 563–576. Neurath, G., M. Dünger, and I. Küstermann: Untersuchungen der “Semivolatiles” des Cigarettenrauches [Investigations of the “semivolatiles” of cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 12–20. Neurath, G., M. Dünger, and F.G. Pein: Interaction of nitrogen oxides, oxygen and amines in gaseous mixtures; in: Environmental N-nitroso compounds. Analysis and formation, edited by E.A. Walker, P. Bogovski, and L. Griciute, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Publ. No. 14 (1976) 215–225. Neurath, G. and H. Ehmke: Apparatur zur Untersuchung des Nebenstromrauches [An apparatus for the investigation of sidestream smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 117–121. Neurath, G. and H. Ehmke: Untersuchungen über den Nitratgehalt des Tabaks [Investigations of the nitrate content of tobacco]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 333–334. Neurath, G., H. Ehmke, and H. Horstmann: Influence of moisture in tobacco on the composition of cigarette
2740.
2741.
2742.
2743.
2744.
2745.
2746.
2747.
2748.
2749.
2750.
2751.
2752. 2753.
2754.
smoke; CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964). Neurath, G., H. Ehmke, and H. Horstmann: Einfluss des Feuchtigskeitsgehaltes von Cigaretten auf die Zusammensetzung des Rauches. III [The influence of tobacco moisture content of cigarettes on the composition of mainstream smoke yield. III]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 361–369. Neurath, G., H. Ehmke, and H. Schneemann: Über den Wassergehalt von Haupt- und Nebenstromrauch [On the water content of mainstream and sidestream smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 351–357. Neurath, G., J. Gewe, and H. Wichern: Über das Vorkommen von Benzofuranen im Tabakrauch [On the occurrence of benzofurans in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 247–249. Neurath, G., Gewe J, and H. Wichern: Über das Vorkommen von Hydroaromaten im Tabakrauch [The occurrence of hydroaromatic compounds in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 250–252. Neurath, G. and H. Horstmann: Einfluss des Feuchtigskeitsgehaltes von Cigaretten auf die Zusammensetzung des Rauches und die Glutzonentemperatur; [The influence of tobacco moisture content on the composition of mainstream smoke yield as well as on the temperature in the combustion zone] Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 93–100. Neurath, G. and R. Kröger: Druckverrauchen - Eine neue Abrauchmethode und Möglichkeiten ihrer Anwendung [Mechanical smoking using a pressure procedure - A new smoking procedure and its application conditions]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 81–88. Neurath, G., A. Krull, B. Pirmann, and K. Wandrey: Untersuchung der flüchtigen Basen des Tabaks. II [Investigation of the volatile bases in tobacco. II]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 571–576. Neurath, G. and G. Lorentzen: Quantitative Bestimmung von Phenolen im Tabakrauch mit 4-Aminoantipyrin (AAP) [Quantitative determination of phenols in tobacco smoke by means of 4-aminoantipyrine (AAP)]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 73–78. Neurath, G., S. Petersen, M. Dünger, D. Orth, and F.G. Pein: Gas-particulate phase distribution and decay rates of constituents in ageing environmental tobacco smoke; Environ. Technol. 12 (1991) 581–590. Neurath, G., B. Pirmann, and M. Dünger: Isolierung von gesättigten heterocyclischen Basen aus dem Tabakrauch [The isolation of saturated heterocyclic bases from tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 129–134. Neurath, G., B. Pirmann, W. Lüttich, and H. Wichern: Zum Frage der N-Nitroso-Verbindungen im Tabakrauch. II [The question of N-nitroso compounds in tobacco smoke. II]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 251–262. Neurath, G., B. Pirmann, and H. Wichern: Zum Frage der N-Nitroso-Verbindungen im Tabakrauch [The question of N-nitroso compounds in tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 311–319. Neurath, G. and O. Schreiber: Investigations on amines in the human environment; Manuscript (1974). Neurath, G. and H. Wichern: Occurrence of bicyclohexyl and C12-C15 n-alkanes in bright tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1967) 69–70. Newell, M.P.: Analysis of sclareol by isotope dilution; RDR, 1958, No. 21, December 12, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500932451 -2468.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1370
11/24/08 2:39:52 PM
1371
Bibliography
2755. Newell, M.P.: Analysis of sclareol by isotope dilution. Use of sclareol-C14; RDR, 1962, No. 7, February 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938772 -8787. 2756. Newell, M.P.: The effect of aging on the sclareolide content of Turkish tobaccos; RDR, 1962, No. 13, May 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938878 -8890; The fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. I. Sclareolide; RDR, 1962, No. 37, November 2, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500939638 -9656; Addendum to the report on fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. I. Sclareolide; RDM, 1963, No. 67, September 16, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500612734 -2735. 2757. Newell, M.P.: The fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. II. Coumarin; RDR, 1963, No. 6, January 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961116 -1130. 2758. Newell, M.P.: Determination of constituents of tobacco by isotope dilution. III. Phenylacetic acid; RDR, 1963, No. 7, February 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961132 -1147; The fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. III. Phenylacetic acid; RDR, 1963, No. 32, April 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961546 -1559. 2759. Newell, M.P.: Transfer of coumarin from cigarette tobacco to mainstream smoke through a special bonded charcoal filter; RDM, 1964, No. 34, March 26, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500602210 -2214. 2760. Newell, M.P.: Smoke comparison: Evaluation of isovaleramide formation in smoke of Test (L10,701-V) vs. Control (L10,701-A) cigarette; RDM, 1977, No. 17, May 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617238 -7243. 2761. Newell, M.P., A.L. Angel, F.W. Best, C.R. Green, R.A. Heckman, R.A. Lloyd Jr, C.W. Miller, R.E. Shackelford, F.A. Thome, and G.W. Young: Comparative smoke studies. I. Winston vs. Marlboro; RDR, 1976, No. 9, April 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004250 -4295. 2762. Newell, M.P., A.L. Angel, C.R. Green, F.W. Best, C.W. Miller, R.A. Lloyd Jr, R.A. Heckman, F.A. Thome, G.W. Young, and R.E. Shackelford: Comparative smoke studies. II. Salem vs. Kool; RDR, 1976, No. 10, July 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004296 -4345. 2763. Newell, M.P. and F.W. Best: Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. II. Carboxylic acids. A. Oxalic acid; RDM, 1965, No. 67, September 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603308 -3315; Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. II. Carboxylic acids. B. L-Malic acid; RDM, 1966, No. 48, August 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603881 -3890; Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. II. Carboxylic acids. C. Citric acid; RDM, 1967, No. 11, February 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612895 -2902; The fate of oxalic, malic, and citric acids in the smoke of cigarettes; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 25, 1968, p. 19. 2764. Newell, M.P. and F.H. Noah: Extraction of cell-wall constituents from burley tobacco grown in a carbon-14 dioxide atmosphere; RDM, 1967, No. 2, January 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612830 -2835; Newell, M.P. and F.W. Best: Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. III. Cell-wall constituents. A. Pectic substances; RDM, 1967, No. 42, August 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613423 -3437; Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. IV. Starch; RDM, 1970, No. 109, December 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615233 -5254; Isotopic fate studies with tobacco constituents. III. Cell-wall constituents. B. A-Cellulose; RDM, 1971, No. 14, March 16, see
2765.
2766.
2767.
2768. 2769.
2770.
2771.
2772.
2773.
2774.
2775.
2776.
2777.
www.rjrtdocs.com 500605415 -5432, 510074889 -4907; Fate of compounds in the burning cigarette. polymeric carbohydrates: pectins, starch, cellulose; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 11, 1971, p. 8. Newell, M.P., F.W. Best, C.R. Green, R.A. Heckman, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and C.W. Miller: Smoke composition. III. 50% G7 versus 100% G7; RDR, 1976, No. 16, October 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004701 -4760. Newell, M.P., F.W. Best, C.R. Green, R.A. Heckman, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and C.W. Miller: Smoke composition. IV. G7 control versus ammoniated G7; RDR, 1976, No. 18, November 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004778 -4818. Newell, M.P., R.A. Heckman, and C.R. Green: Smoke composition: Homogenized G7L versus nonhomogenized tobacco blend; RDR, 1974, No. 4, April 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003374 -3436. VOID Newell, M.P., R.A. Heckman, R.F. Moates, C.R. Green, F.W. Best, and J.N Schumacher: The composition of the ether-soluble portion of the particulate phase of cigarette smoke; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 39, 1975, p. 28; Isolation and identification of new components of the ether-soluble portion of cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 6–11. Newell, M.P. and P.H. Latimer: The fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. IV. (A). Menthol; RDR, 1963, No. 52, September 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500962050 -2061; Newell, M.P.: The fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. IV (C). Menthol; RDM, 1966, No. 21, May 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603655 -3664; Newell, M.P., P.H. Latimer, and L.R. Haefele: The fate of menthol in cigarette smoke; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 24, 1968, p. 18. Newell, M.P. and P.H. Latimer: Effect of a charcoal filter on the transfer of menthol to mainstream smoke; RDM, 1963, No. 66, September 16, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500612731 -2733. Newell, M.P., P.H. Latimer, and H.E. Moser: The fate of flavorants of tobacco during smoking. IV. (B). Menthol content of mainstream smoke versus number of puffs; RDR, 1964, No. 4, January 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963280 -3293. Newell, M.P., C.W. Miller and N.C. Sanders: Comparative smoke studies. VI. Winston, Vantage, Now, Marlboro, Merit; RDR, 1977 No. 4, November 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501005165 -5313. Newell, M.P., C.W. Miller, N.C. Sanders, and A.L. Angel: Search for “strangers” in the smoke of fluidized bead bed (FBB) expanded tobacco; RDM, 1978 No. 4, February 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607444 -7448. Newell, M.P., C.W. Miller, N.C. Sanders, A.L. Angel, and F.W. Conrad Jr: Comparative smoke studies: BB and its control. RDM, 1977, No. 38, December 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606863 -6924. Newell, M.P. and H.E. Moser: The transfer of menthol from tobacco to smoke through a bonded charcoal filter. RDM, 1964, No. 92, October 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602477 -2485. Newell, M.P., J.N. Schumacher, R.A. Heckman, C.R. Green, F.W. Best, C.W. Miller, A.L. Angel, R.A. Lloyd Jr, G.W. Young, F.A. Thome, and J.M. Martin:
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1371
11/24/08 2:39:52 PM
1372
2778. 2779.
2780.
2781.
2782. 2783.
2784.
2785.
2786. 2786a.
2787.
2788.
2789.
2789a.
2790.
2791.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Comparison of U.K. More “L9122a” with a white paper control “L9122B”; RDM, 1975, No. 42, November 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503244116 -4154. Newman, M.: The synthesis of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60 (1938) 1141–1142. Newman, R.H., G.E. Lester, R.W. Jenkins, and T.G. Williamson: The fate of halogens in the smoke of the 1R1 Kentucky Reference Cigarette; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 33, 1973, p. 24. Newsome, J.R. and C.H. Keith: Variation of the gas phase composition within a burning cigarette; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 65–69. Newsome, J.R., V. Norman, and C.H. Keith: Smoking machines for the analysis of the vapor phase of tobacco smoke; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 26, 1965, p. 39. Newsome, J.R., V. Norman, and C.H. Keith: Vapor phase analysis of tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 102–110. Nicod, J.L.: Toxicité aigue et pouvoir cancérigène de tabacs préextraits [Acute toxicity and carcinogenicity of preextracted tobaccos]; Z. Präventivmed. 8 (1963) 444–454. Nicolaus, G. and H. Elmenhorst: Nachweis und quantitative Bestimmung von Alkylnaphthalinen in Latakia-Tabak [Detection and quantitative determination of alkylnaphthalenes in Latakia tobacco]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 133–140. Nie, C., G. Lu, J. Liu, M. Zhao, P. Li, and Y. Hu: Studies on nano-catalysts for decreasing CO in cigarette smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 32, 2003, pp. 37–38. Nielsen, M.T.: Altering flavor and aroma constituents in burley tobacco; Tob. Sci. 35 (1991) 69–73. Niki, E., S. Minamisawa, M. Oikawa, and E. Komuro: Membrane damage from lipid oxidation by free radicals in cigarette smoke; in: Tobacco smoking and nutrition: Influence of nutrition on tobacco-associated health risks, edited by J.N. Diana and W.A. Pryor, N. Y. Acad. Sci., New York, NY, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 686 (1993) 29–38. Nikolin, B., A. Nikolin, and H. Butmir: Colorimetric determination of ammonia in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 10. Nisbet M.A. and V.C. Runeckles: Rapid detection and estimation of polyol humectants in tobacco by thin layer chromatography; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 109–110. Nisbet M.A. and S. Schmeller: Colorimetric determination of glycerol in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 145–146. Nisbet, M.A. and S. Schmeller: Inhibition of radical initiated vinyl acetate polymerization by tobacco smoke fractions; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 11, 1973, p. 16. Nishi, H., H. Yoshitani, and T. Kamachi: Studies of tobacco casing. VI. Analytical method of polyols in cased shredded tobacco by gas chromatography; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 111 (1970) 85–88. Nishidawa, A., B. Prokopczyk, A. Rivenson, E. Zang, and D. Hoffmann: A study of betel quid carcinogenesis. VIII.
2791a. 2792.
2793.
2794.
2794a.
2795.
2796.
2796a.
2797.
2798.
2799.
2799a.
2800. 2801.
2802.
Carcinogenicity of 3-(methylnitrosamino)propionaldehyde in F344 rats; Carcinogenesis 13 (1991) 369–372. Nishizawa, O.: Chilling-resistant plants and their production; U.S. Patent No. 5,516,667 (May 14, 1996). Nitsch, A., K. Kalcher, H. Greschonig, and R. Pietsch: Schwermetalle in Tabaken und in Tabakrauch. II: Spurenelemente Cadmium, Blei, Kupfer, Kobalt und Nickel in österreichischen Zigaretten und deren Rauchkondensaten und Rauchgasen [Heavy metals in tobacco and tobacco smoke. II. Trace elements cadmium, lead, copper, cobalt, and nickel in Austrian cigarettes and their smoke condensate and vapor phase]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 15 (1991) 19–32. Noda, S.: Beitrag zur Erklärung der Rauchwirkung (starke und milde Zigarren mit gleichem Nikotingehalt; Nikotingehalt von neuen und alten Pfeifen) [Contribution to the explanation of the action of smoke (strong and mild cigars with similar nicotine contents; nicotine content from new and old pipes)]; Thesis, Würzburg University (1908). Noguchi, M., H. Sakuma, and E. Tamaki: N-(3-Amino3-carboxypropyl)-B-carboxypyridinium betaine: A new amino acid from tobacco leaves; Arch Biochem. Biophys. 125 (1968) 1017–1018. Noguchi, M., Y. Satoh, K. Nishida, S. Andoh, and E. Tamaki: Studies on storage and ageing of leaf tobacco. Part IX. Changes in the content of amino acid-sugar compounds during ageing; Agric. Bio. Chem., 35 (1971) 65–70. Noguchi, M., K. Yamamoto, and E. Tamaki: Studies on nitrogen metabolism in tobacco plants. A. Part V. Changes of the free amino acid composition of tobacco leaves with age; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 8–12. Noma, M., N. Kawashima, and M. Noguchi: Isolation and characterization of hydroxyvaleric acid derivatives from tobacco leaves and the hydrolysate of tobacco extract; J. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 913–915. Noma, N., M. Noguchi, and E. Tamaki: A new amino acid, nicotianamine, from tobacco leaves; Tetrahedron Lett. 22 (1971) 2017–2020. Noma, M., M. Noguchi, and E. Tamaki: Isolation and characterization of D-alanyl-D-alanine from tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 37 (1973) 2439. Norman, A.B., T.A. Perfetti, P.F. Perfetti, and R.G. Hayworth: The heat of combustion of tobacco and carbon oxide formation; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 297–307. Norman, A.B. and J.H. Reynolds IV: Determination of the amount of carbon dioxide diffusing through the cigarette wrapper; RDM, 1977, No. 39, December 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606925 -6931, 514901152 -1157. Norman, V.: An overview of the vapor phase, semivolatile and nonvolatile components of cigarette smoke; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 3 (1977) 28–58. Norman, V.: Changes in smoke chemistry of modern day cigarettes; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 8 (1982) 141–177. Norman, V., A.M. Ihrig, T.M. Larson, and B.L. Moss: The effect of some nitrogenous blend components on NO/NOx and HCN levels in mainstream and sidestream smoke; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 48, 1981, p. 25; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 55–62. Norman, V. and C.H. Keith: Charged particles in cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 21, 1964, p. 23; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 75–79.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1372
11/24/08 2:39:53 PM
1373
Bibliography
2803. Norman, V. and C.H. Keith: Nitrogen oxides in tobacco smoke; Nature 205 (1965) 915–916. 2804. Norman, V., J.R. Newsome, and C.H. Keith: Vapor phase analysis of tobacco smoke; 145th Ann. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., New York, NY (1963); Techniques for the analysis of tobacco smoke vapours; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 27, 1963, p. 19. 2805. Norman, V., J.R. Newsome, and C.H. Keith: Smoking machines for the analysis of the vapor phase of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 216–221. 2806. Norman, V. and R.R. Vinson: Nitrogen oxide-nitrogen dioxide analysis of cigarette smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 23, 1967, p. 13. 2807. Norpoth, K. and T. Papatheodorou: Thin-layer chromatography of 4-(4’-nitrobenzyl)-pyridine-reactive compounds in tobacco smoke; Naturwissenschaften 57 (1970) 346. 2808. Norpoth, K., T. Papatheodorou, and G. Venjakob: Chromatographische Untersuchungen zur Auftrennung alkylierender Fraktionen des Cigarettentabaks und des Cigarettenrauches [Chromatographic investigation of the fractionation of the alkylating fractions of cigarette tobacco and cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 106–116. 2808a. Nottbohm, F.E. and F. Mayer: Über das Vorkommen und die Bestimmung von Cholin in Samen und Blättern des Tabaks [Occurrence and detection of choline in tobacco seeds and leaves]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 63 (1932) 620–623. 2809. Number of identified tobacco smoke components: A comment: Since the mid-1980s, few newly identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components have been reported. Reasonable explanations for why the number of identified smoke components may exceed 3,900 include: (a) At the 38th TCRC, Arrendale et al. reported the identification of a series of long-chained aliphatic esters [Arrendale, R.F., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, and M.G. Stevenson: Isolation and identification of the wax esters from the cuticular waxes of green tobacco leaf; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1988) 67–84]. Although many matched those reported by Rodgman et al. [Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, S.A. Bellin, S.S. Mims, and G.W. Young: The composition of cigarette smoke. IX. The composition of an aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco and tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 42–49], other esters with higher molecular weight acid and alcohol moieties plus iso and anteiso structures were found by Arrendale et al. Since each ester reported by Rodgman et al. was found in tobacco and smoke, logic dictates that each new tobacco ester found by Arrendale et al. is also present in smoke. (b) In the PAH studies by Snook et al. [Snook, M.E., R.F. Severson, H.C. Higman, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke: Isolation and identification; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 250–272; Snook, M.E., R.F. Severson, R.F. Arrendale, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: The identification of high molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in a biologically active fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 79–101; Multi-alkylated polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke: Separation and identification; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 222–247], numerous peaks are listed as being mixtures of two or more isomers, a fact ignored by many
2810.
2811.
2812.
2813.
2814.
2815.
2816.
2817.
2817a.
2817b.
2818.
2819.
2820.
cataloguers of smoke components. (c) In tobacco smoke, several dozen secondary amines exist for which no corresponding NNAs have been reported. Because these NNAs are known and stable, they probably exist in smoke. (d) Similarly, the parent amines for several volatile NNAs in smoke have not been identified in tobacco smoke. Nystrom, C.W.: The polyphenols of tobacco. I. The quantitative determination of chlorogenic acid, rutin, and scopoletin in tobacco and tobacco products; RDR, 1961, No. 27, May 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936644 -6689. Nystrom, C.W.: The polyphenols of tobacco. II. Determination of chlorogenic acid, rutin, and scopoletin in cigarette tobacco blend fractions; RDR, 1961, No. 20, April 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936460 -6471. Nystrom, C.W.: The polyphenols of tobacco. III. Factors influencing the chlorogenic acid, rutin, and scopoletin content of flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1961, No. 39, August 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500937194 -7227; Effect of aging on the content of chlorogenic acid, rutin and scopoletin in flue-cured tobacco; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 22, 1961, p. 10. Nystrom, C.W.: Test of tourmaline filters for removal of polonium-210 from cigarette smoke; RDM, 1964, No. 65, June 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009890 -9894. Nystrom, C.W.: Polonium-210: Failure of ion-exchange resin filters to selectively remove polonium-210 from cigarette smoke; RDM, 1967, No. 66, October 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613602 -3606. Nystrom, C.W. and S.A. Bellin: Polonium-210 in tobacco. I. Evidence that a major portion originates from atmospheric contamination of tobacco plants; RDR, 1964, No. 17, March 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963469 -3478. Nystrom, C.W. and N.W. Sizemore: Biosynthesis of flavorants in tobacco plants. I. Large differences in content of five-carbon and six-carbon branched-chain acids in Turkish tobacco plants grown under different conditions; RDM, 1963, No. 28, March 25. Nystrom, C.W. and N.W. Sizemore: Rapid method for determination of five- and six-carbon acid content of sugar esters and sugar ester fractions isolated from tobacco. Utilization of alcoholysis reaction for preparation of ethyl esters for gas chromatographic analysis; RDR, 1963, No. 53, September 27, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500962062 -2071. Oakley, E.T.: Benzo[a]pyrene delivery of all-burley, all-bright, and all-Turkish cigarettes; Memorandum to F.E. Resnik, February 28, 1966, see www.pmdocs.com 1001884565/4566. Oakley, E.T.: Benzo[a]pyrene in sidestream smoke; Memorandum to F.E. Resnik, February 1, 1966, see www.pmdocs.com 1000702902. Oakley, E.T.: Quantitative determination of sucrose and fructose in tobacco and filler; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 99–101. Oakley, E.T., L.F. Johnson, and H.M. Stahr: A rapid method for the determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 19–21. Oakley, E.T., J.D. Millham, and L. Weissbecker: An empirical correlation of two methods for phenols in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chim. Acta 31 (1964) 272–278.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1373
11/24/08 2:39:53 PM
1374
2820a. Oakley, E.T. and H.M. Stahr: Benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke: Method No. S-23; Report, October 1965, see www.pmdocs.com 2504108144/8150. 2821. Oakley, E.T., L. Weissbecker, and F.E. Resnik: Determination of formic and acetic acids in cigarette smoke; Conf. Anal. Chem., Pittsburgh, PA (1965); Gas chromatographic determination of free formic and acetic acids in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 37 (1965) 380–382. 2822. Obi, Y., M. Mutamatsu, and Y. Shimada: Quality coefficient of tobacco leaves by gas phase of mainstream smoke of cigarette; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 161–162. 2823. Obi, Y. and H. Nakano: Studies on sulfur in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 104 (1962) 65–70. 2824. Obi, Y., H. Oe, T. Tsugane, T. Akaki, H. Komorida, N. Gunji, and H. Sakurai: Research on American and Canadian burley tobacco leaves. I. Chemical composition, smoking quality, and filling ability; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 243–248. 2825. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Indoor air quality; Fed. Reg. 59 (No. 65) (1994) 15968–16039. 2826. Ogden, M.W.: High resolution gas chromatography of tobacco smoke. The contribution of Kurt Grob; HRC & CC 11 (1988) 3–15. 2827. Ogden, M.W.: CORESTA environmental tobacco smoke analysis collaborative program. R&DM, 1989, No. 203, July 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508291459 -1563; Gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in environmental tobacco smoke: Collaborative study; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 72 (1989) 1002–1006. 2828. Ogden, M.W.: Quinoline interference in environmental tobacco smoke nicotine determination; R&DM, 1990, No. 1, January 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508381068 -1075. 2829. Ogden, M.W.: Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) collaborative study: Methods of analysis for nicotine, 3-ethenylpyridine, respirable suspended particles (RSP), ultraviolet particulate matter (UVPM), fluorescent particulate matter (FPM), and solanesol; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 7, 2000, p. 20; CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper STPOST12, p. 215. 2830. Ogden, M.W., R.A. Davis, K.C. Maiolo, M.F. Stiles, D.L. Heavner, R.B. Hege, and W.T. Morgan: Multiple measures of personal ETS exposure in a populationbased survey of nonsmoking women in Columbus, Ohio; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 7, 1993, p. 21. 2831. Ogden, M.W., L.W. Eudy, D.L. Heavner, F.W. Conrad Jr, and C.R. Green: Improved gas chromatographic quantitation of trace levels of environmental nicotine; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 41, 1986, p. 22; Improved gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in environmental tobacco smoke; R&DM, 1989, No. 75, March 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508282003 -2016. 2832. Ogden, M.W. and R.A. Jenkins: Nicotine in environmental tobacco smoke - I: Uniqueness, measurement,
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2833.
2834.
2835.
2836.
2837.
2838.
2839.
2839a.
2840.
2841. 2842.
2843.
and emission rates; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 80, 1999, p. 64. Ogden, M.W. and K.C. Maiolo: Collection and analysis of solanesol as a tracer of environmental tobacco smoke; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 48, 1988, p. 41; Collection and analysis of solanesol as a tracer of environmental tobacco smoke in indoor air; R&DM, 1989, No. 76, March 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508282017 -2039; Collection and determination of solanesol as a tracer of environmental tobacco smoke in indoor air; Environ. Sci. Technol. 23 (1989) 1148–1154. Ogden, M.W. and K.C. Maiolo: Comparison of GC and LC for determining solanesol in environmental tobacco smoke; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 28, 1990, p. 25; LC-GC 10 (1992) 459–462. Ogden, M.W. and K.C. Maiolo: Comparative evaluation of diffusive and active sampling systems for determining airborne nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine; Environ. Sci. Technol. 26 (1992) 1226–1234. Ogden, M.W., K.C. Maiolo, P.R. Nelson, D.L. Heavner, and C.R. Green: Artifacts in determining the vaporparticulate phase distribution of environmental tobacco smoke nicotine; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 5, 1992, p. 22; Artefacts in determining the vapour-particulate phase distribution of environmental tobacco smoke nicotine; Environ. Technol. 14 (1993) 779–785. Ogden, M.W. and P.R. Nelson: Detection of alkaloids in environmental tobacco smoke; in: Modern methods of plant analysis, Vol. 15: Alkaloids, edited by H.F. Linskens and J.F. Jackson, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (1994) pp. 163–189. Ogden, M.W. and J.D. Richardson: Effect of lighting and storage conditions on the stability of ultraviolet particulate matter, fluorescent particulate matter, and solanesol; Tob. Sci. 42 (1998) 10–15. Ogden, M.W. and S.B. Sears: Biases in environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) risk assessment due to misclassification and background correction; R&DM (ETS), 1992, No. 4, January 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508298119 -8135; Ogden, M.W., S.B. Sears, and W.T. Morgan: Biases in environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) risk assessment due to misclassification and background correction. Indoor Environ. Manuscript submitted (1992), see www.rjrtdocs.com 515254829 -4854. Ogg, C.L.: Effect of ammonia on the determination of nicotine by the silicotungstic acid method; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 3, 1948. Ogg, C.L.: Determination of particulate matter and alkaloids (as nicotine) in cigarette smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 47 (1964) 356–362. Ogg, C.L.: Report on tobacco, 79th Ann. Mtg. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem., Washington, DC: October 11–14 (1965). Ogg, C.L.: Determination of tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 2, 1969, p. 3. Ogg, C.L., W.W. Bates Jr, E.C. Cogbill, R.H. Blackmore, and E.L. Petersen: Determination of total particulate
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1374
11/24/08 2:39:53 PM
Bibliography
2844.
2845.
2846.
2847.
2848.
2848a.
2849.
2849a.
2849b.
2850.
2851.
2852.
2853.
2854.
2855.
matter, nicotine, and water in cigarette smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 45 (1962) 540–545. Ogg, C.L., W.W. Bates Jr, E.C. Cogbill, L.S. Harrow, and E.L. Petersen: Report on the determination of total alkaloids, nicotine and nornicotine in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 98–102. Ogg, C.L., W.W. Bates Jr, E.C. Cogbill, L.S. Harrow, and E.L. Petersen: Determination of secondary, tertiary, and total alkaloids in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 43 (1960) 524–529. Ogg, C.L. and R.H. Cundiff: Determination of potassium in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 46 (1963) 413–415. Ogg, C.L. and R.H. Cundiff: Determination of chlorides in tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 46 (1963) 415–418. Ogg, C.L. and E.F. Schulz: Determination of tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 15, 1970, p. 10. O’Hagan, D.: Pyrrole, pyrrolidine, pyridine, piperidine and tropane alkaloids; Nat. Prod. Rep. 17 (2000) 435–446. Ohgaki, H., H. Hasegawa, T. Kato, M. Suenaga, M. Ubukata, S. Sato, S. Takayama, and T. Sugimura: Induction of tumors in the forestomach and liver of mice by feeding 2-amino-3,4-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ); Proc. Japan Acad. 61B (1985) 137–139. Ohgaki, H., K. Kusama, N. Matsukura, K. Morino, H. Hasegawa, S. Sato, T. Sugimura, and S. Takayama: Carcinogenicity in mice of a mutagenic compound, 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, from broiled sardine, cooked beef and beef extract; Carcinogenesis 5 (1984) 921–924. Ohgaki, H., N. Matsukura, K. Morino, T. Kawachi, T. Sugimura, and S. Takayama: Carcinogenicity in mice of mutagenic compounds from glutamic acid and soybean globulin pyrolysates; Carcinogenesis 5 (1984) 815–819. Ohnishi, A. and K. Kato: Thermal decomposition of tobacco cell-wall polysaccharides; Proc. 6th Internat Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 181–182; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 147–152. Ohnishi K, E. Takagi, and K. Kato: Thermal decomposition of pectic substances; Carbohydrate Res. 67 (1978) 281–288. Ohshima, H., J. Nair, M.C. Bourgade, M. Friesen, L. Garren, and H. Bartsch: Identification and occurrence of two N-nitrosamino acids in tobacco products 3-N-nitroso-3-N-methylaminopropionic acid and 4-N-nitroso4-N-methylaminobutyric acid; Cancer Lett. 26 (1985) 153–162. Okada, T., Y. Ishizu, and K. Matsunuma: Determination of particle-size distribution and concentration of cigarette smoke by a light-scattering method; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 153–160. Okada, T. and Y. Shibayama: Studies on physical properties and filtration of cigarette smoke. I. Delivery of water to particulate and gaseous phases; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 151–156. Okada, T. and Y. Shibayama: Studies on physical properties and filtration of cigarette smoke. II. Distribution and amount of water and tar in mainstream smoke and butt; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 157–162.
1375
2855a. Okinaka,Y., Y. Shimada, R. Nakano-Shimada, M. Ohbayashi, S. Kiyokawa, and Y. Kikuchi: Selective accumulation of delphinidin derivatives in tobacco using a putative flavonoid 3`,5`-hydroxylase cDNA from Campanula medium; Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 67 (2003) 161–165. 2856. Oliver, B.W.: Thin-layer chromatographic separation of benzo[a]pyrene from cigarette tar; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 35, 1965, pp. 51–53. 2856a. Olson, T.J.: Determination of Nemacur® residues in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Chemagro Rept. No. 30448 (1971). 2857. Omori, F., N. Higashi, M. Ohida, Y. Sone, and S. Suhara: Internal standard-based analytical method for tobacco smoke vapor phase components; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1999) 131–146. 2858. Onishi, I.: Recent studies on tobacco smoke by the Japan Monopoly Corporation; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium (1959) 553–559. 2859. Onishi, I.: Chemistry of tobacco; Kagaku (Chem.) 14 (1959) 106–110, 308–318. 2860. Onishi, I., T. Fukuzumi, K. Yamamoto, and H. Takahara: Anthraquinone in tobacco smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 103 (1961) 25–29. 2860a. Onishi, I. and M. Nagasawa: Studies on the essential oils of tobacco leaves. Part II. Carbonyl fraction; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 19 (1955) 143–147; Part VII. Carbonyl fraction (II); Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 38–42. 2861. Onishi, I., M. Nagasawa, H. Tomita, and T. Fukuzumi: Studies on the essential oils of tobacco leaves. XVI. Neutral fraction. (III). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on burley tobacco leaves; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. 22 (1958) 17–20. 2861a. Onishi, I., H. Tomita, and T. Fukuzumi: Studies on the essential oils of tobacco leaves. Part IV. Neutral fraction; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 20 (1956) 61–67; Part XV. Neutral fraction (II); Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 239–242. 2862. Onishi, I. and K. Yamamoto: Studies on the essential oils of tobacco leaves. Part III. Phenol fraction; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 19 (1955) 148–156; Part VI. Phenol fraction (II); Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 20 (1956) 70–73; Part XI. Phenol fraction (III); Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 90–94; Part XIV Phenol fraction (IV); Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 181–194. 2862a. Onishi, I. and K. Yamasaki: Studies on the essential oils of tobacco leaves. Part I. Acid fraction; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 19 (1955) 137–142; Part IX. Acid fraction of the American flue-cured tobacco leaf; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 82–85; Part X. Acid fraction in the essential oil of the Japanese flue-cured leaf before redrying and aging; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 21 (1957) 86–89. 2863. Onishi, I. and K. Yamasaki: Studies on the essential oils of tobacco leaves. Part V. The isolation of B–methylvaleric acid and 2-furoic acid from tobacco essential oil; Bull. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 20 (1956) 68–69. 2864. Onishi, K.: The essential oils in tobacco leaf; Koryo (Aromatics) 1960(55) 9–15. 2864a. Oritani, T. and H. Kiyota: Biosynthesis and metabolism of abscisic acid and related compounds; Nat. Prod. Rept. 20 (2003) 414–425.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1375
11/24/08 2:39:53 PM
1376
2864b. Oró, J., J. Han, and A. Vlatkis: Application of high resolution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to the analysis of the pyrolysis of isoprene; Anal. Chem. 3 (1967) 27–32. 2865. Orris, L., B.L. Van Duuren, A.I. Kosak, N. Nelson, and F.L. Schmitt: The carcinogenicity for mouse skin and the aromatic hydrocarbon content of cigarette-smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 21 (1958) 557–561. 2865a. Osawa, Y., B. Tochigi, M. Tochigi, S. Ohnishi, Y. Watanabe, K. Bullion, G. Osawa, Y. Nakabayashi, and C. Yarborough: Aromatase inhibitors in cigarette smoke, tobacco leaves and other plants; J. Enzyme Inhib. 4 (1990) 187–200. 2866. Osborne, J.S., S. Adamek, and M.E. Hobbs: Some components of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 211–215. 2867. Osborne, J.S. and E.S. Harlow: Gas phase of cigarette smoke: The effects of changes in smoking techniques on the CO2:CO concentration ratio; Virginia J. Sci. 7 (1956) 307. 2868. Osborne, J.S. and M.E. Hobbs: Some constituents of the gas phase of cigarette tobacco smoke; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper No. 25, 1954, p. 8; Osborne, J.S., S. Adamek, and M.E. Hobbs: Some components of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 211–215. 2868a. Oshimura, M. and J.C. Barrett: Chemically induced aneuploidy in mammalian cells: Mechanisms and biological significance in cancer; Environ. Mutagenesis 8 (1986) 129–159. 2869. Osman, S. and J. Barson: Volatile bases of cigar smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 15, 1963, pp. 12–13; The volatile bases of cigar smoke; Phytochemistry 3 (1964) 587–590. 2870. Osman, S. and J. Barson: Hydrocarbons of cigar smoke; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 158–160. 2871. Osman, S. and J. Barson: Hydrocinnamyl nitrile in cigar smoke condensate; Chem. and Ind. (1966) 699. 2872. Osman, S. and J. Barson: The isolation of farnesyl acetone from cigar smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 85–87. 2873. Osman, S. and J. Barson: An aromatic acid fraction of cigar smoke condensate; Phytochemistry 5 (1966) 511–515. 2874 Osman, S. and J. Barson: The chemical comparison of four cigar filler tobaccos. I. Preliminary investigation of mainstream and sidestream smoke; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 25–27. 2875. Osman, S., J. Barson, and C.J. Dooley: Paraffins of cigar smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 48 (1965) 1059–1062. 2876. Osman, S., I. Schmeltz, H.C. Higman, and R.L. Stedman: Volatile phenols of cigar smoke; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 141–143. 2877. Owen, T.B.: Tar and nicotine from U. S. cigarettes: Trends over the past twenty years; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, 1975, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76–1221 (1976) 1–12. 2878. Owen, W.C. and M.L. Reynolds: The diffusion of gases through cigarette paper during smoking; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 14–20.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2878a. Owens, W.F. Jr: Effect of cigarette paper on smoke yield and composition; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 4 (1978) 3–24. 2878b. Owttrim, G.W., S. Hofmann, and C. Kuhlemeier: Divergent genes for translation initiation factor elF-4A are coordinately expressed in tobacco; Nucleic Acids Res. 19 (1991) 5491–5496. 2878c. Owttrim G.W., T. Mandel, H. Trachsel, A.A. Thomas, and C. Kuhlemeier: Characterization of the tobacco eIF-4A gene family; Plant Mol. Biol. 26 (1994) 1747–1757. 2878d. Oxidase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term oxidase glycolate tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: Barak, S., A. Nejidat, Y. Heimer, and M. Volokita: Transciptional and posttranscriptional regulation of the glycolate oxidase gene in tobacco seedlings; Biomed. Life Sci. 45 (2001) 399–407. A search for oxidase diamine tobacco provides the following reference: Heim, W.G. and J.G. Jelesko: Association of diamine oxidase and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase in Nicotiana tabacum extracts; Plant. Mol. Biol. 56 (2004) 299–308. Search for other oxidases provides similar references. 2878e. Oxygenase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term oxygenase benzoate tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: Chong, J., M.-A. Pierrel, R. Atanassova, D. Werck-Reichhart, B. Fritig, and P. Saindrenan: Free and conjugated benzoic acid in tobacco plants and cell cultures. Induced accumulation upon elicitation of defense responses and role as salicylic acid precursors; Plant Physiol. 125 (2001) 318–328. Search for other oxygenases provides similar references. 2879. Ozdemir, M. and Y. Yasar: Studies on analytical and health aspects of cigarette smoke: Nitrogen oxide, nicotine, and N-nitrosamine content; Doga Muhendislik Cevre Bilim. 11 (1987) 273–278. 2880. Paffgen, J.: Verfahren zur Abtrennung von giftigen Bestandteilen aus dem Tabakrauch [Process for the separation of the poisonous constituents of tobacco smoke]; German Patent No. 549,413 (1932). 2881 Pailer, M., W. Hübsch, and H. Kuhn: Beitrag zur Bestimmung des Benzo[a]pyrens in Tabakrauchkondensaten [Contribution to the estimation of benzo[a]pyrene in tobacco smoke condensate]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie, Spec. Issue (1965) i-xi. 2882. Pailer, M., W. Hübsch, and H. Kuhn: Über das Vorkommen aromatischer Aminen in Zigarettenrauch [On the occurrence of aromatic amines in cigarette smoke]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 6 (1966) 1448–1451. 2883. Pailer, M., W. Hübsch, and H. Kuhn: Untersuchung der aliphatischen primären und sekundären Amines des Zigarettenrauches mit Hilfe der Gaschromatographie und Massenspektrometrie [Investigation of the primary and secondary aliphatic amines of cigarette smoke with the help of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 7 (1967) 109–118. 2884. Pailer, M. and H. Klus: Die Bestimmung von N-Nitrosaminen im Zigarettenrauchkondensat [The determination of N-nitrosamines in cigarette smoke condensate]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 12 (1971) 203–211. 2885. Pailer, M., H. Klus, Simonitsch E, and H. Kuhn: The determination of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke condensate; CORESTA Bull. (1971) 71.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1376
11/24/08 2:39:53 PM
1377
Bibliography
2886. Pailer, M. and H. Kuhn: Kurzer Bericht über das Vorkommen von Nickel im Zigarettenrauch [A short report on the occurrence of nickel in cigarette smoke]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 4 (1963) 61–63. 2887. Pailer, M., H. Kuhn, and I. Grünberger: Über quantitativen Unterschiede im Auftreten von niedermolekularen Carbonylverbindungen im Rauch von Zigaretten verschiedener Tabakmischung und verschiedenen Feuchtigkeits-gehaltes [On the quantitative difference in the occurrence of low molecular weight carbonyl compounds in smoke from cigarettes with different tobacco blends and different moisture contents]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 3 (1962) 33–39. 2888. Pailer, M. and O. Sulm: Pyrolysis of tobacco additives; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 14 (1973) 258–266. 2889. Pailer, M., K. Völlmin, C. Karninen, and H. Kuhn: Über das Vorkommen von primären und sekondären Aminen im Zigarettenrauch [On the occurrence of primary and secondary amines in cigarette smoke]; Fachl. Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 10 (1969) 165–168. 2890. Palfray, L., S. Sabetay, L. Sabourin, and H.F. Emmanuel: Le tabac et son parfum [Tobacco and its aroma]; Ann. Chim., Anal. Chim. Appl. 23 (1941) 311. 2891. Palmer, A.M.: The determination of organic acids in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 83. 2892. Palmer, A.M. and R.M. Ikeda: Gas chromatographic determination of catechol in cigarette smoke; Manuscript. (1967). 2892a. Palmer, G.K. and R.C. Pearce: Production practices. B. Light air-cured tobacco; Chapter 5B in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 143–153. 2892b. Palmer, J.K.: Occurrence of d-glyceric acid in tobacco leaves; Science 123 (1956) 415. 2892c. Palmer, J.K.: Occurrence of l-quinic acid in tobacco leaves; Science 126 (1957) 504–505. 2893. Pappas, N.A. and X.E. Binopoulos: Isolation, identification and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of cigarette smoke condensate using the thin layer chromatographic technique. Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 979–1002. 2894. Parmele, H.B. and C.O. Jensen: Smoking tobacco product; British Patent No. 903,067 (August 9, 1962). 2895. Paschke, T., H.-J. Eberhardt, W.-D. Heller, and G. Scherer: Effects of ingredients added to cigarette tobacco on smoke composition and biological activity: A literature overview; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 9, 2000, pp. 21–22. 2896. Paschke, T., G. Scherer, and W.-D. Heller: Effects of ingredients on cigarette smoke composition and biological activity: A literature overview; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2000) 107–247. 2897. Passey, R.D.: Carcinogenicity of cigarette tars; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 35 (1957) 65–66. 2898. Passey, R.D. and M. Blackmore: Cigar and cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 43 (1966) 89–90. 2899. Patel, A.R., M.Z. Haq, C.L. Innerarity, L.T. Innerarity, and K. Weissgraber: Fractionation studies of smoke condensate from Kentucky Reference Cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 19 (1974) 58–59. 2900. Patrianakos, C.P., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Aromatic amines in cigarette smoke; 31st Tobacco
2901. 2902.
2903.
2904.
2905.
2906.
2907.
2908.
2909.
2910.
2910a. 2911.
2911a.
2911b.
2911c.
Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 44, 1977, p. 23; Patrianakos, C.P. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXIV. On the analysis of aromatic amines in cigarette smoke; J. Anal. Toxicol. 3 (1979) 150–154. Patterson, C.C.: Contaminated and natural lead environments of man; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 11 (1965) 344–360. Patterson, J.M., M.L. Baedecker, R. Musick, and W.T. Smith Jr: Possible role of lysine, leucine, and tryptophan in formation of tobacco “tar”; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 26–27. Patterson, J.M., W.-Y. Chen, and W.T. Smith Jr: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from pyrolysis of phenylalanine and phenylalanine-tryptophan and phenylalanine-pyrrole mixtures; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 98–99. Patterson, J.M., N.F. Haidar, S.P. Chen, and W.T. Smith Jr: An investigation of some factors affecting the phenol production in tobacco pyrolysis; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 108–110. Patterson, J.M., N.F. Haidar, E.P. Papadopoulos, and W.T. Smith Jr: Pyrolysis of phenylalanine, 3,6-dibenzyl-2,5-piperazinedione, and phenylethylamine; J. Org. Chem. 38 (1973) 663–666. Patterson, J.M., N.F. Haidar, W.T. Smith Jr, J.F. Benner, H.R. Burton, and D. Burton: Benzo[a]pyrene formation in the pyrolysis of selected amino acids, amines, and maleic hydrazide; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 268–270. Patterson, J.M., C.H. Issidorides, V.C. Groutas, and W.T. Smith Jr: Pyrolysis of maleic hydrazide and N,N’dimethyldodecylamine; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1972) 337–338. Patterson, J.M., A. Tsamasfyros, and W.T. Smith Jr: Pyrolysis of pyrrole; J. Heterocyclic Chem. 5 (1968) 727–729. Patton, H.W. and G.P. Touey: Gas chromatographic determination of some hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 1685–1688; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 82–85. Paul, T.J., M. Dunn, R. McKeivor, D. Graham, and V. Graham: The determination of major phenolic compound in mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke by high performance liquid chromatography; 2002 CORESTA Congress, Paper ST 32. Pauling, L.: Nature of the chemical bond; Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY (1937). Pavlu, J. and J. Sula: Detection and estimation of 3,4benzpyrene and arsenic in cigarette smoke; Casopis Lekaru Ceskych 96 (1960) 101–104, for translation see www.rjrtdocs.com 503288286 -8293. Paximadis, M. and M. E. C. Rey: Genome organization of Tobacco leaf curl Zimbabwe virus, a new, distinct monopartite begomovirus associated with subgenomic defective DNA molecules; J. Gen. Virology 82 (2001) 3091–3097. Pearce, G., S. Johnson, and C.A. Ryan: Purification and characterization from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves of six small, wound-inducible, proteinase isoinhibitors of the potato inhibitor II family; Plant Physiol. 102 (1993) 639–644. Pearse, H.L. and L. Novellie: South African tobacco. I. Preliminary identification of amino acids and other constituents; J. Sci. Food Agr. 4 (1953) 108–112.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1377
11/24/08 2:39:53 PM
1378
2911d. Pearse, H.L. and T. Swain: South African tobacco. II. Identification of some phenolic constituents; South African J. Sci. 53 (1957) 281–285. 2912. Peck, R.L., S.F. Osman, and J.F. Barson: Cigar butt aroma. I. A preliminary study of cigar butt headspace vapors; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 38–39. 2913. Pedersen, P.M. and E.S. Harlow: Distribution of radioactivity in main and sidestream cigarette smoke using carbon-14 labeled materials; 10th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 10, Paper No. 14, 1956, pp. 10–11. 2913a. Peedin, G.F.: Production practices. A. Flue-cured tobacco; Chapter 5A in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 104–142. 2914. Peele, D.M., D.A. Danehower, and G.D. Goins: Chemical and biochemical changes during the fluecuring of tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 21 (1995) 81–133. 2915. Peele, D.M., M.E. Edwards, J.S. Gentry, and T.B. Nestor: Formation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in flue-cured tobacco; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 88, 1999, pp. 68–69. 2916. Peele, D.M. and J.S. Gentry: Formation of tobaccospecific nitrosamines in flue-cured tobacco; CORESTA, Mtg. Smoke-Technology Groups, Innsbruck, Austria: Paper ST6 (1999). 2917. Peele, D.M., M.G. Riddick, M.E. Edwards, J.S. Gentry, and T. Nestor: Formation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in flue-cured tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 27 (2001) 3–12. 2917a. Peng, F., L. Sheng, B. Liu, H. Tong, and S. Liu: Comparison of different extraction methods: Steam distillation, simultaneous distillation and extraction and headspace co-distillation, used for the analysis of the volatile components in aged flue-cured tobacco leaves; J. Chromat. A 1040 (2004) 1–17. 2917b. Peng, O, L.P. Bush, and H.R. Burton: Alkaloids, nitrates, nitrites, and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in dark tobacco; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 26, 1989, p. 26. 2918. Perakis, X.: Contribution to the determination of 3,4benzpyrene in tobacco smoke condensate; Z. Anal. Chem. 204 (1964) 28–32. 2918a. Perfetti, T.A.: Structural study of nicotine salts; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 43–54. 2919. Perfetti, P.F.: Sidestream smoke. II. A review of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company research and development reports; R&DM, 1988, No. 196, August 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507038653 -8672. 2920. Perfetti, T.A. and W.M. Coleman III: Chiral-gas chromatography-selected ion monitoring-mass selective detection analysis of tobacco materials and tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 15–33. 2921. Perfetti, T.A. and W.M. Coleman III: Chiral-gas chromatography-selected ion monitoring-mass selective detection analysis of secondary alkaloids in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 35–42. 2922. Perfetti, T.A., W.M. Coleman III, and W.S. Smith: Determination of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke components for cigarettes of different tobacco
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2923.
2924.
2925.
2926.
2927.
2928. 2929.
2930.
2931.
2931a.
2932.
2933.
2934.
types and a set of reference cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 95–113. Perfetti, T.A. and H.H. Gordin: Just noticeable difference studies of mentholated products; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 47, 1984, p. 25; Just noticeable difference studies of mentholated cigarette products; Tob. Sci. 29 (1985) 57–66. Perfetti, T.A., B.M. Gordon, W.M. Coleman III, and W.T. Morgan: Determination of the transfer efficiency of d-nicotine to mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 237–244. Perfetti, T.A. and L.E. Hayes: The effect of Karl Fischer water content of cigarettes on the transport of nicotine; RDM, 1979, No. 30, July 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500608674 -8674. Perfetti, T.A., A.B. Norman, B.M. Gordon, W.M. Coleman III, W.T. Morgan, G.M. Dull, and C.W. Miller: The transfer of nicotine from nicotine salts to mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2000) 141–158. Perfetti, T.A., A.B. Norman, A.L. Robinson, B.W. Arzonico, and M.F. Dube: Cigarette products with low mainstream gas phase delivery and low sidestream particulate yields; R&DM, 1987, No. 8, January 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505799855 -9869. Périgord, L.: La fumée du tabac [Tobacco smoke]; Thesis, Paris (1879) pp. 1–49. Perinelli, M.A. and N. Carugno: Determination of trace metals in cigarette smoke by atomic absorption spectrometry; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S03, 113; Determination of trace metals in cigarette smoke by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 214–217. Perini, F.R. and J.H. Bell: Determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in tobacco as a measure of browning and quality; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 9, 1983, p. 5. Perini, F.R. and J.H. Bell: Measurements of ions in whole smoke; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 33, 1994, pp. 43–44. Perini, F.R., J. Guan, and J.D. Johnson: Precursors to the pyrosynthesis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in cigarette smoke. I. Experimental design, matrix preparation and analytical methods; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 90, 2005, p. 69. Perini, F.R., E.A. Robinson, and L.A. Gains: Evidence for peroxynitrite and cognates in whole smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 90, 2001, pp. 72–73; Perini, F.R. and E.A. Robinson: Evidence for peroxynitrite and cognates in whole smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 264–272. Petering, H.G., E.E. Menden, and L.W. Michael: Cadmium in tobacco and its fate during smoking; Natl. Inst. OSHA, Cincinnati, OH (1988) pp. 1–8. Peterson, L.A.: Tobacco smoke: Evaluation of the constituents of tobacco smoke; 4th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 4, Paper No. 9, 1950, p. 2.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1378
11/24/08 2:39:54 PM
Bibliography
2934a. Petracek, M.E., L.F. Dickey, S.C. Huber, and W.F. Thompson: Light-regulated changes in abundance and polyribosome association of ferredoxin mRNA are dependent on photosynthesis; The Plant Cell 9 (1997) 2291–2300. 2934b. Pettersson, T., A.-M. Eklund, and I. Wahlberg: (Tobacco chemistry. 80) New lactones from tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 41 (1993) 2097–2103. 2935. Pfeiffer, C.A. and E. Allen: Attempts to produce cancer in Rhesus monkeys with carcinogenic hydrocarbons and estrogens; Cancer Res. 8 (1948) 97–109. 2936. Pfyl, B.: Zur Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch. II [On the determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke. II]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 66 (1933) 501–510. 2937. Pfyl, B.: Zur Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch. III [On the determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke. III]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 66 (1933) 510–524. 2938. Pfyl, B. and C.O. Schmitt: Zur Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabak und Tabakrauch [On the determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 54 (1927) 60–77. 2939. Philip Morris Inc.: Chemical constituents in tobacco and smoke. A compilation of published information; Philip Morris Inc., Richmond, VA (1963) pp. 1–47. 2940. Philippe, R.J.: Dimethyl sulfide in cigarette smoke: On the origin of sulfur compounds of cigarette smoke and on their possible contribution to its overall flavor and aroma; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 577–582; Dimethyl sulfide in cigarette smoke. On the origin of sulfur compounds of cigarette smoke and on their possible contribution to its overall flavor and aroma; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1003–1010. 2941. Philippe, R.J. and E.J. Hackney: The presence of nitrous oxide and methyl nitrite in cigarette smoke; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 18, 1958, p. 7; The presence of nitrous oxide and methyl nitrite in cigarette smoke and tobacco pyrolysis gases; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 139–143. 2942. Philippe, R.J. and M.E. Hobbs: Some components of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 2002–2006. 2943. Philippe, R.J. and R.G. Honeycutt: Methyl isocyanate in cigarette smoke and its retention by an absorption-type filter; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 24, 1964, p. 37; Tob. Sci. 9 (1966) 33–37. 2944. Philippe, R.J., R.G. Honeycutt, and J.M. Ruth: Some C6 hydrocarbons of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 20 (1965) 250–259. 2945. Philippe, R.J. and H. Moore: The presence of methyl thionitrite in cigarette smoke and tobacco pyrolysis products; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 31, 1960, p. 15; The semiquantitative determination of methyl thionitrite and carbon disulfide in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 121–124. 2946. Philippe, R.J., H. Moore, R.G. Honeycutt, and J.M. Ruth: Some hydrocarbons of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 25, 1963, p. 18; Anal. Chem. 36 (1964) 859–865.
1379
2947. Phillips, G.F. and R.E. Waller: Yields of tar and other smoke components from UK cigarettes; Food Chem. Toxicol. 29 (1991) 469–474. 2947a. Phillips, M.: Method for the collection and assay of volatile organic compounds in breath; Anal. Biochem. 247 (1997) 272–278. 2947b. Phillips, M. and A.M. Bacot: Isolation of inactive inositol from flue-cured American tobacco; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 496. 2947c. Phillips, M. and A.M. Bacot: The chemical composition of certain grades of Type II American flue-cured tobacco: Relationship of composition to grade characteristics; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 36 (1953) 504–524. 2948. Phillpotts, D.F., D. Spincer, and D.T. Westcott: The effect of the natural sugar content of tobacco upon the acetaldehyde concentration found in smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 7–10. 2948a. Phosphatase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term phosphatase adenosine tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: Dyson, W.H. and R. H. Hall: N6-(∆2-Isopentenyl) adenosine: Its occurrence as a free nucleoside in an autonomous strain of tobacco tissue; Plant Physiology 50 (1972) 616–621. Search for other phosphatases provides similar references. 2949. Piadé, J.J., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Alkaloids and nonvolatile N-nitrosamines in tobacco and smoke of French cigarettes; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 56, 1979, p. 31. 2950. Piadé, J.J., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: The semivolatile and gas phases of cigarette smoke from air cured tobacco: Chromatographic profiling and effect of aging; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 16, 1980, p. 9. 2951. Piadé, J.J., S. D’Andrés, and E.B. Sanders: Sorption of nicotine and ethenylpyridine vapor on different materials in a test chamber; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 24, 1996, p. 34; Sorption phenomena of nicotine and ethenylpyridine vapour on different materials in a test chamber; in: Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Indoor Air Quality and Climate: Indoor Air ’96, 4 (1996) 33–38. Organizing Committee 7th Internat. Conf. On Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Tokyo. 2952. Piadé, J.J. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXVII. Quantitative determination of alkaloids in tobacco by liquid chromatography; J. Liquid Chromatog. 3 (1980) 1505–1515. 2953. Piascik, M.T., R.B. Champney, E.J. Kasarkis, and T. Forrester: A method for enriching the cadmium content of cigarette smoke and effect of exposure to this smoke on coronary vascular reactivity in the rat; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 81 (1985) 525–532. 2954. Pickering, J.W., S.H. Wender, and E.C. Smith: The effect of certain naturally occurring compounds on the activity of rat lung glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, glutathione reductase and glutathione peroxidase; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 75–76. 2955. Piehl, D.H.: The use of nickel cyanide-ammonia complexes in the selective filtration of tobacco smoke; RDR, 1968, No. 41, November 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500969203 -9209.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1379
11/24/08 2:39:54 PM
1380
2956. Piehl, D.H.: Selective filtration of HCN in tobacco smoke by metal-amidoxime starch complexes; RDR, 1970, No. 10, February 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501000116 -0129. 2957. Pieraccini, G., F. Luceri, and G. Moneti: New gas-chromatographic/mass spectrometric method for the quantitative analysis of primary aromatic amines in main- and in side-stream smoke; Rapid Comm. Mass. Spectrom. 6 (1992) 406–409. 2958. Pierce, L.H.: The absorption of nicotine in cigarette smoking; J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap. 60 (1937) 114. 2959. Pierce, L.H.: The absorption of nicotine in cigarette smoking; J. Lab. Clin. Chem. 26 (1941) 1322–1325. 2960 Pietzsch, A.: Die Papierchromatographie cancerogener Kohlenwasserstoffe [Paper chromatography of carcinogenic hydrocarbons]; Pharmazie (Berlin) 12 (1957) 24–30. 2961. Pietzsch, A.: Zum Nachweis von cancerogenen Kohlenwasserstoffen im Tabakrauch [On the detection of carcinogenic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke]; Naturwissenschaften 45 (1958) 445. 2962. Pietzsch, A.: Zum Nachweis von cancerogenen Kohlenwasserstoffen im Tabakrauch [On the detection of carcinogenic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke]; Pharmazie (Berlin) 14 (1959) 466–473. 2963. Pietzsch, A.: Ein weiterer Beitrag zum Thema Retinierung von Rauchbestandteilen beim Zigarettenrauchen [An additional contribution to the theme of retention of smoke components from cigarette smoke]; Pharmazie (Berlin) 17 (1962) 36–41. 2964. Pietzsch, A.: Demonstration of carcinogenic hydrocarbons, with special reference to paper chromatography; Arch. Geschwulstforsch. 21 (1964) 137–143, see Carc. Abstr. 2(2) (1964) 64–245. 2964a. Pignocchi, C., J.M. Fletcher, J.E. Wilkinson, J.D. Barnes, and C.H. Foyer: The function of ascorbate oxidase in tobacco; Plant Physiol. 132 (2003) 1631–1641. 2965. Pillai, M.A. and M.C. Gupta: Concentration of carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke; Chem. Age India 24 (1973) 265–267. 2966. Pillsbury, H.C., C.C. Bright, K.J. O’Connor, and F.W. Irish: Tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 52 (1969) 458–462. 2967. Pindar, A.R.: Alkaloids of tobacco; in: Chemistry of carbon compounds. Vol. 4c. Heterocyclic compounds, edited by E.H. Rodd, Elsevier, New York, NY (1960). 2967a. Pinney, T. Shanks, D.M. Burns, G.N. Connolly, and D.R. Shopland: Health risks associated with cigar smoking; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284 (2000) 735–740. 2968. Pisklov, V.P. and I.G. Mokhnachev: Untersuchung der Gruppenvorstufen einiger Komponenten der gasförmigen Phase des Tabakrauches [Preliminary investigation of several components in the the gaseous phase of tobacco smoke]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 18 (1971) 66–79. 2969. Pleasants, S.W., C.M. Haynes, and L.S. Harrow: A rapid spectrophotometric determination of total nicotine alkaloids in tobacco smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 42 (1959) 424–427. 2969a. Plesse, B., M.-C. Criqui, A. Durr, Y. Parmentier, J. Fleck, and P. Genschik: Effects of the polyubiquitin gene Ubi. U4 leader intron and first ubiquitin monomer on reporter gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum; Plant Mol. Biol. 45 (2001) 655–667.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
2970. Podraza, K.F., M.F. Borgerding, J.A. Bodnar, F.S. Hsu, J.R. Reid, M.A. Sudholt, C.R. Taylor Jr, and J.F. Whidby: 1999 Massachusetts benchmark study to evaluate mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke constituent yields. Part 1. General summary and overview of results; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 15, 2000, pp. 25–26. 2970a. Poel, W.E.: Carcinogens and minimal carcinogenic doses; Science 123 (1956) 588; Poel, W.E., D. Stanton, E. Peters, and H.O. Wade: Approximation of a threshold-maximal carcinogenic dose range for 3,4-benzpyrene when applied repeatedly to mouse skin; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 4 (2) (1958) 333; Poel, W.E. and A.G. Kammer: Preliminary studies in a quantitative approach to skin carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 16 (1958) 989–994. 2971. Poggiale, M. and H. Marty: Examination of hydrocyanic acid in tobacco smoke; J. Pharm. Chim. 11 (1870) 216–218. 2972. Poindexter, E.H. Jr and R.D. Carpenter: The isolation and identification of harmane alkaloids in cigarette smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 16, 1961, p. 8; Isolation of harmane and norharmane from cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (1962) 176; The isolation of harmane and norharmane from tobacco and cigarette smoke; Phytochemistry 1 (1962) 215–221; Poindexter, E.H. Jr, A. Bavley, and H. Wakeham: Tobacco smoke alkaloids: Isolation and identification of harmane; Proc. 3rd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Salisbury, Rhodesia (1963) 550–556. 2972a. Ponstein, A.S., S.A. Bres-Vloemans, M.B. SelaBuurlage, P.J.M. van den Elzen, L.S. Melchers, and B.J.C. Cornelissen: A novel pathogen- and wound-inducible tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) protein with antifungal activity, Plant Physiol. 104 (1994) 109–118. 2973. Pontag, J.J.: Investigation of Russian tobacco and cigarette smoke; Chem. Ztg. 26 (1902) 359; Investigation of Russian smoking tobacco and cigarette smoke; Z. Untersuch. Nahrungs- und Genussmitt. Gebrauchsgegenstande 6 (1903) 673–691. 2974. Pool, W.F., C.S. Godin, and P.A. Crooks: Nicotine racemization during cigarette smoking; Toxicologist 5 (1985) 232. 2975. Popova, L.P.: Composition of smoke from tobacco dried under different conditions; Izvest. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zavedenii Pishchevaya Tekh. 1960(4) 35–39. 2976. Popova, L.P.: Composition of smoke from tobacco fermented under different conditions; Izvest. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zavedenii Pishchevaya Tekh. 1961(3) 97–101, see Chem. Abstr. 55 (1961) 22719a. 2977. Popova, L.P.: Chemical composition of tobacco smoke; Sborn. Nauchn. Issled. Inst. Tabaka Makhorki (Krasnodar) 153 (1963) 211–226. 2978. Popp, H.: Über das Vorkommen von Arsen im Tabak [Occurrence of arsenic in tobacco]; Z. Angew. Chem. Zent. Tech. Chem. 41 (1928) 838–839. 2979. Popp, M.: Nikotinarme Tabake [Nicotine-poor tobacco]; Pflanzenernahr. Dung. Bodenk. 12A (1928) 334–344. 2980. Popp, M. and J. Contzen: Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabak und Tabakrauch [Estimation of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 46 (1922) 1001–1002. 2981. Posselt, W. and L. Reimann: Chemische Untersuchungen des Tabaks und Darstellung des eigentümlichen
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1380
11/24/08 2:39:54 PM
1381
Bibliography
2982.
2983.
2984.
2985.
2986.
2987.
2988. 2988a.
2989.
2989a.
2990.
2991.
2991a.
2992.
wirksamen Prinzips dieser Pflanze [Chemical investigations of tobacco and preparation of the characteristic effective principles of these plants]; Geigers Magazin Pharm. 24 (1828) 138–161. Post, E.: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Nikotins [Contribution to the knowledge of nicotine]; Thesis, Leipzig (1932) pp. 1–58. Prakash, A. and M.S. Ireland: A high performance liquid chromatographic method to quantitate phenols in isopropanol extract of mainstream cigarette smoke; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 40, 1992, pp. 46–47. Preiss, W.: Über die Verringerung des Nikotingehalts im Rauch durch Fumasan-Stäbchen [On decreasing the nicotine content of smoke by Fumasan sticks]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 75 (1934) 501–503. Preiss, W.: Wirkung von Zellulose-Filtereinlagen in Zigaretten auf den Nikotingehalt des Rauches [Action of cellulose filters in cigarettes on the nicotine content of smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 76 (1935) 313–316. Preiss, W.: Zur Bestimmung von Nikotin, Ammoniak, Pyridinbasen und Teer im Tabakrauch und über die Wirksamkeit einiger Entnikotinisierungsspitzen [The determination of nicotine, ammonia, pyridine bases and tar in tobacco smoke and the efficiency of several denicotinization systems]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 77 (1936) 437–458. Preiss, W.: Bestimmung des Ammoniaks neben Pyridinbasen im Tabak und Tabakrauch [Determination of ammonia in the presence of pyridine bases in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 72 (1936) 189–196. Preiss, W.: Zur Kenntnis des Rauchens [Information on smoking]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 72 (1936) 196–212. Prentiss, A.M.: Chemicals in war. A treatise on chemical warfare; 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1937) 139–140. Prescott, A.B.: Contribution from the chemical laboratory of the University of Michigan. VIII. Estimation of nicotine in tobacco by E.T. Pease; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2 (1880) 338–339. Preussmann, R.: Occurrence and exposure to N-nitroso compounds and precursors; in: N-nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller CT, J. Long , and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 3–15. Preussmann, R. and G. Eisenbrand: N-Nitroso carcinogens in the environment; Chapter 13 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second Edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 829–868. Preussmann, R. and B.W. Stewart: N-Nitroso carcinogens; Chapter 12 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second Edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 643–828. Proetz, A.: The effects of tobacco (smoking) on the respiratory tract; Trans. Am. Acad. Opthalmol. 44 (1939) 243–246; Some preliminary experiments in the study of cigarette smoke and its effects on the respiratory tract; Ann. Otol., Rhinol., Laryngol. 48 (1939) 176–194. Prokopczyk, B., S. Amin, M. Wu, D. Desai, A.M. Idris, S. Ng, and D. Hoffmann: The evaluation of carcinogenic potential of Sudanese snuff toombak: Determination of
2993.
2994.
2995.
2996.
2997.
2997a.
2997b.
2998.
2998a.
2998b. 2998c.
2999.
2999a.
tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and genotoxicity; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 35 (1994) 131. Prokopczyk, B., J.E. Cox, P. Upadhyaya, S. Amin, D. Desai, D. Hoffmann, and K. El-Bayoumy: Effects of dietary 1,4-phenylene bis(methylene)selenocyanate on 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanoneinduced DNA adduct formation in lung and liver of A/J mice and F344 rats; Carcinogenesis 17 (1996) 749–753. Prokopczyk, B., D. Hoffmann, J.E. Cox, M.V. Djordjevic, and K.D. Brunnemann: The application of supercritical fluid extraction for the analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco; 45th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 45, Paper No. 15, 1991, p. 21. Prokopczyk, B., A. Sharma, J.E. Cox, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Application of supercritical fluid extraction for the analysis of selected components in chewing tobacco; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 69, 1990, p. 47. Prokopczyk, B., M. Wu, J.E. Cox, S. Amin, D. Desai, and D. Hoffmann: The application of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) for the determination of tobaccospecific N-nitrosamines in various tobacco samples. II. Optimization of the method; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 45, 1994, pp. 51–52. Prokopczyk, B., M. Wu, J.E. Cox, S. Amin, D. Desai, A.M. Idris, and D. Hoffmann: Improved methodology for the quantitative assessment of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco by supercritical fluid extraction; J. Agr. Food Chem. 43 (1995) 916–922. Proteinase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term proteinase inhibitor tobacco provides numerous references to it, including the following: Johnson, R., J Narvaez, G. An, and C Ryan: Expression of proteinase inhibitors I and II in transgenic tobacco plants: effects on natural defense against Manduca sexta larvae; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86 (1989) 9871–9875. A search for other proteinases provides similar references. Protein formation: Protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A (Nicotiana tabacum Samsun clone NeIF-5A3 isoform reduced), see http://ftp.dna.affrc.go.jp/pub/ codon/GB108/species/Nicotiana_tabacum.pln. Provost, A.: La fumée du tabac [Tobacco smoke]; Chapter 3 in: Technologie du tabac [Tobacco technology], edited by A. Provost, Heliographia SA, Lausanne, Switzerland (1959) 30–36. Pryor, W.A.: The role of free radical reactions in biological systems; in: Pryor, W.A.: Free radicals in biology, Academic Press, New York, NY (1976) pp. 1–43. Pryor, W.A.: Free radical biology: Xenobiotics, cancer, and aging; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 393 (1982) 1–30. Pryor, W.A.: Oxy-radical and related species: Their formation, their lifetimes, and their reactions; Ann. Rev. Physiol. 48 (1986) 657–667. Pryor, W.A., B.J. Hales, P.I. Premovic, and D.F. Church: The radicals in cigarette tar: Their nature and suggested physiological implications; Science 220 (1983) 425–427. Pryor, W.A., D.G. Prier, and D.F. Church: An electronspin resonance study of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke: The nature of the free radicals in gas-phase
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1381
11/24/08 2:39:54 PM
1382
3000.
3001.
3001a.
3002.
3003.
3004.
3005.
3006.
3007.
3008.
3009.
3010.
3011. 3012.
3013.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
smoke and in cigarette tar; Environ. Hlth. Perspect. 47 (1983) 345–355. Pryor, W.A. and K. Stone: Oxidants in cigarette smoke: Radicals, hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrate, and peroxynitrite; in: Tobacco smoking and nutrition: Influence of nutrition on tobacco-associated health risks, edited by J.N. Diana and W.A. Pryor, N.Y. Acad. Sci., New York, NY, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 686 (1993) 12–28. Pryor, W.A., K. Uehara, and D.F. Church: The chemistry and biochemistry of the radicals in cigarette smoke: ESR evidence of the binding of the tar radical to DNA and polynucleotides; in: Oxygen radicals in chemistry and biology, edited by W. Bors et al., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (1984) 193–201. Pucher, G.W. and H.B. Vickery: The katabolism of the non-volatile organic acids of tobacco leaves during curing; Physiology 19 (1933) 623–626. Pujic, Z. and Z. Knezevic: Polonium-210 content of tobacco. Determination of polonium-210 in the environment; Glasnik Hermicara Tekh. Bosne Hercegovine 12 (1963) 75–79. Pullman, A. and B. Pullman: Electronic structure and carcinogenic activity of aromatic molecules. New developments; Adv. Cancer Res. 3 (1955) 117–169. Pullman, J.O., W.J. Hollenbeck, and G.W. Gibson: The measurement of the moisture content of cut tobacco by means of microwave absorption: Part 1; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 166–172; The measurement of the moisture content of cut tobacco by means of microwave absorption: Part 2; 9 (1965) 173–178. Purkayastha, B.C. and D.K. Bhattcharyya: On the investigation of different radioactive constituents present in Indian tobacco leaves: Part I; Proc. Indian Sci. Cong. Assoc. 60 (1973) 116. Purkayastha, B.C. and D.K. Bhattcharyya: Estimation of rare radioactive constituents in samples of Indian tobacco with the aid of a low-level beta-counter; J. Radioanal. Chem. 27 (1977) 345–351. Purkis, S.W., C.A. Hill, and I.A. Bailey: Current reliability of measurements of smoke analytes; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 16, 2001, pp. 29–30; Current measurement reliability of selected smoke analytes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 314–324. Pyatnitskii, M.P. and S.M. Kashirin: Studies on the chemical composition of tobacco smoke bases; Vsesoy. Inst. Tabach. Makharochnoi 133 (1937) 47–63. Pyriki, C.: Über das Auftreten von Nikotin im Zigarettenrauch [On the occurrence of nicotine in cigarette smoke]; Z. Angew. Chem. Zent. Tech. Chem. 44 (1931) 553–554; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 62 (1931) 95–99. Pyriki, C.: Gesundheits-Zigaretten-Spitzen [Healthcigarettes-connection]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 73 (1932) 257–260. Pyriki, C.: On the absorption of nicotine in cigarette smoking; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 64 (1932) 163–171. Pyriki, C.: Über das Auftreten von Nikotin im Zigarettenrauch. II [On the occurrence of nicotine in cigarette smoke. II]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 64 (1932) 263–277; III; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 65 (1933) 566– 571; IV; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 68 (1934) 420–431; V; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 70 (1935) 527–535. Pyriki, C.: Distribution of nicotine in the smoking of cigarettes; Chem. Ztg. 58 (1934) 543.
3014. Pyriki, C.: Über die Anreicherung des Nikotins in Zigarettenstummel [On the concentration of nicotine in cigarette butts]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 76 (1935) 513–517. 3015. Pyriki, C.: Über den Zigarettenrauch und dessen Nikotin [On cigarette smoke and its nicotine]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 78 (1937) 313–318. 3016. Pyriki, C.: Beiträge zur Frage des Tabakrauchens [Contribution to the question of tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 78 (1937) 533–534. 3017. Pyriki, C.: Über harzartige Bestandteile des Orient Tabaks und dessen Rauchs [Resinous constituents of Oriental tobacco and its smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 80 (1940) 42–61. 3018. Pyriki, C.: Monosacchariden, Saccharose und Maltose im Tabak [Monosaccharides, saccharose, and maltose in tobacco]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 82 (1941) 401–416. 3019. Pyriki, C.: Beitrag zur Standardisierung der Nikotinbestimmung [Contribution to the standardization of nicotine determination]; Acta Nicotiana 2 (1943) 116–121. 3020. Pyriki, C.: Information über Tabak und Tabakchemie für Jedermann [Tobacco information and tobacco chemistry for everybody]; Deut. Tabakztg. 12 (1943) 1; Deut. Tabakztg. 13 (1943) 2. 3021. Pyriki, C.: Über die Nikotinanreicherung in Zigarettenstummeln und seine Beziehung zur Reaktion des Hauptstromrauchs [Nicotine accumulation in cigarette stubs and its relation to reaction of the main smoke stream]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 85(1943) 337–346. 3022. Pyriki, C.: Untersuchungen über den Rauch von Zigaretten [Investigation of the smoke from cigarettes]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 88 (1948) 254–269. 3023. Pyriki, C.: Untersuchungen von neue angebauten Deutschen Tabaken [Investigation of newly generated German tobacco]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 90 (1950) 276. 3024. Pyriki, C.: Der Tabakrauch und seine Wirkung [Tobacco smoke and its action]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 92 (1953) 242–248. 3025. Pyriki, C.: Verhalten des Nikotins und anderer Stoffe im Rauch von Zigaretten aus einheimischen Tabaken [The behavior of nicotine and other components in the smoke from domestic tobacco cigarettes]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 1 (1954) 62–93. 3026. Pyriki, C.: The influence of tobacco composition on the flavor effect on smoking; Lebensm. Ind. 1 (1954) 264. 3027. Pyriki, C.: The nicotine content of tobacco and its combustion products as well as its fate on smoking; Pharmazie 8 (1954) 806–812. 3028. Pyriki, C.: Distribution of nicotine in the smoking of cigarettes; Chem. Ztg. 58 (1958) 279, 543. 3029. Pyriki, C.: Relations entre la composition chimique du tabac et les caractères de la fumée [Relationship between the chemical composition of tobacco and the characteristics of smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 460–488, 489–495. 3030. Pyriki, C.: Polycyclische Kohlenwasserstoffe im Zigarettenrauch [Polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke]; Mitt. Gdch-Fachgruppe Lebens. Gericht. Chem. 14(2) (1960) 27–29. 3031. Pyriki, C.: Das Verhalten von Oxynikotin beim Verrauchen [The retention of nicotine N-oxide during smoking]; Die Nahrung 4 (1960) 310–323. 3032. Pyriki, C.: The appearance of polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1960(1) 11–13.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1382
11/24/08 2:39:54 PM
1383
Bibliography
3033. Pyriki, C.: Polycyclische und aliphatische Kohlenwasserstoffe des Tabakrauches [The polycyclic and aliphatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke]; German Chem. Soc., Ann. Mtg., Leipzig DDR (1962); Die Nahrung 7 (1963) 439–448. 3034. Pyriki, C.: and W. Endemann: The reduction of the nicotine content of cigarettes; Lebensm. Ind. 3 (1956) 185–186. 3035. Pyriki, C. and J. Fritzsche: Zur Frage der Wirkung von Filterzigaretten [On the question of the action of filter cigarettes]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 103 (1956) 113–121. 3036. Pyriki, C. and F. Homann: Die Paraffinkohlenwassertoffe des Tabaks [The paraffin hydrocarbons of tobacco]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 10 (1963) 69–106. 3037. Pyriki, C. and W.F. Homann: Gruppenzugehörigkeit von Fermentierten Tabaken und des Verhalten derselben bei der Wasserdampfbehandlung [Fermented tobacco and its behavior on steam treatment]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 2 (1955) 151–173. 3038. Pyriki, C. and W.F. Homann: Über Chinatabak. II. Die weiteren Merkmale der Tabak und die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen der chemischen Zusammensetzung und der Handelsqualität [On tobacco alkaloids. II. Additional characteristics of tobacco and the correlation between its chemical composition and commercial quality]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 6 (1959) 106–125. 3039. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenauer: Auf Frage des intermittierenden Verrauchens von Zigaretten [On the question of the intermittent puffing of cigarettes]; Die Nahrung 2 (1959) 117–133. 3040. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenauer: Adsorptionswirkungen von Filterzigaretten auf fluoreszierende Stoffe des Rauches und das Verhalten dieser Substanzen bei Lichteinwirkung [Adsorptive action of filter cigarettes on the fluorescent substances in smoke and the behavior of these substances on exposure to light]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 98 (1959) 503–512. 3041. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenauer: Contribution to nicotine determination in mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 9 (1962) 104–122. 3042. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenhauer: Investigations on tobacco pectins and their influence on the quality of tobacco; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 10 (1963) 238– 263; Tobacco pectins and their influence on the quality of tobacco; Nahrung 7 (1963) 539–544. 3043. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenauer: On the efficiency of commercial cigarette filters in regard to retention of tobacco smoke phenols; CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964). 3044. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenauer: On the determination of the alkaloids nicotine and nornicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke; 1st Tob. Symp., Plovdiv, Bulgaria (1965). 3045. Pyriki, C. and W. Moldenauer: Das Verhalten von Nikotin und Pyridin bei der Vordestillation zur spectrophotometrischen Alkaloidbestimmung im Tabakrauch [The behavior of nicotine and pyridine on distillation before spectrophotometric determination of alkaloids in tobacco smoke]; Die Nahrung 9 (1965) 683–689. 3046. Pyriki, C., W. Moldenauer, and T.W. Knappe: Zur Frage der Behandlung des Zigarettenpapieres und des Tabaks zwecks Verminderung von polycyclischen Kohlenwasserstoffen
3047.
3048.
3049.
3050.
3051.
3052.
3053.
3054.
3055.
3056.
3057.
3058.
3059. 3060.
in deren Rauch [The question of the treatment of cigarette paper and tobacco with regard to reduction of the polycyclic hydrocarbons in the smoke]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 12 (1965) 37–55. Pyriki, C. and R. Müller: Über das Auftreten von polycyclischen Kohlenwasserstoffen im Zigarettenrauch. I [On the occurrence of polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke. I]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 6 (1959) 231–240. Pyriki, C. and R. Müller: Beeinflussung der Qualität des Tabaks und des Gehaltes an Methylalkohol durch Mitarbeitung der Hauptrippen von Grossblattrigen Sorten [Influence of the quality of tobacco and its methanol content on yield during manufacture with the large-leaf type]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 8 (1961) 258–273. Pyriki, C., R. Müller, and W. Moldenauer: Über das Auftreten von polycyclischen Kohlenwasserstoffen im Zigarettenrauch. II. Untersuchung des lipophilen Anteiles der einzelnen Rauchphasen sowie des Tabaks [On the occurrence of polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke. II. Investigation of the lipophilic constituents of the individual smoke phases as well as of tobacco]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 7 (1960) 81–102. Qian, N., J. Wilkins, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Formation of nitrosonornicotine (NNN) in cigarette smoke from the nornicotine present in tobacco; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 60, 2004, pp. 58–59. Qian, N., Q. Zha, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of acrylamide in mainstream cigarette smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 45, 2004, p. 48. Qiu, J. and X. Jin: Organic acid analysis in tobacco by ion chromatography with conductivity detection; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 73, 2001, pp. 62–63. Quin, L.D.: Gas chromatographic identification and determination of some of the nonvolatile acids of cigarette smoke; Southeastern Regional Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Durham, NC (1957). Quin, L.D.: The separation and partial identification of the alkaloids of cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 14, 1958. Quin, L.D.: Chromatographic identification and determination of some of the nonvolatile acids of cigarette smoke; Southeastern Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Durham, NC (1957). Quin, L.D.: Alkaloids of tobacco smoke. I. Fractionation of some tobacco alkaloids and of the alkaloid extract of burley cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; J. Org. Chem. 24 (1959) 911–914. Quin, L.D.: Alkaloids of tobacco smoke. II. Identification of some of the alkaloids in burley tobacco smoke; J. Org. Chem. 24 (1959) 914–916. Quin, L.D.: 3-Pyridyl methyl ketone and 3-pyridyl ethyl ketone as constituents of burley tobacco cigarette smoke; Southeastern Regional Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Richmond, VA (1959). Quin, L.D.: Chemical studies on tobacco and its smoke; Selecta Chim. 2 (1962) 37–62. Quin, L.D., W. George, and B.S. Menefee: Some semiquantitative gas chromatographic studies on the organic
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1383
11/24/08 2:39:55 PM
1384
3061.
3062.
3063.
3064.
3065.
3066.
3067.
3068.
3069. 3070. 3071.
3072.
3072a.
3072b.
3073.
3074.
3075.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
acids of tobacco and its smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 44 (1961) 367–373. Quin, L.D. and M.E. Hobbs: Analysis of the nonvolatile acids in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography of their methyl esters; Anal. Chem. 30 (1958) 1400–1405. Quin, L.D., B.S. Menefee, and N.A. Pappas: Alkaloids of tobacco smoke. III. Methyl and ethyl 3-pyridyl ketone as constituents of burley tobacco cigarette smoke; J. Org. Chem. 26 (1961) 267–268. Quin, L.D. and N.A. Pappas: Quantitative determination of individual alkaloids in tobacco by gas chromatography; J. Agr. Food Chem. 10 (1962) 79–82. Quin, L.D., P. Wilder, and M.E. Hobbs: Chromatographic determination of steam-volatile acids in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 30 (1958) 546–547. Quincy, R.B., G.W. Wilson, and M.R. Guerin: Series II experimental cigarettes. Summary of chemical analytical results; Oak Ridge National Laboratory (March 18, 1974). Radford, E.P. Jr: Polonium-210 in tobacco could endanger health; UNC School Publ. Hlth., Environ. Sci Eng. Mtg. (October 20, 1964). Radford, E.P. Jr: Polonium-210 alpha radiation as a cancer initiator in tobacco smoke; Radiation Res. 59 (1974) 223. Radford, E.P. Jr and V.R. Hunt: Polonium-210: A volatile radioelement in cigarettes; Science 143 (1964) 247–249. Radford, E.P. Jr and V.R. Hunt: Cigarettes and polonium-210; Science 144 (1964) 366–367. Radford, E.P. Jr, V.R. Hunt, and J.B. Little: Polonium210 in cigarette smokers; Science 146 (1964) 87. Radford, E.P. Jr, J.B. Little, V.R. Hunt, and C. Nelson: Polonium-210 in tobacco smoke as a tracer for particle deposition and movement in human lungs; Fed. Proc. 23(2, Part I) (1964) 1582. Rainey, P., K. Tincher, G. Gillman, and R. Bereman: Plant steroids: Their role in the formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon formation from the combustion of tobacco; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 16, 2002, p. 28. Räisänen, U., I. Pitkänen, H. Halttunen, and M. Hurtta: Formation of the main degradation compounds from arabinose, xylose, mannose and arabinitol during pyrolysis; J. Thermal Anal. Calorimetry 72 (2003) 481–488. Rakieten, N., M.L. Rakieten, D. Feldman, and M.J. Boykin Jr: Mammalian ciliated respiratory epithelium: Studies with particular reference to effects of menthol, nicotine, and smoke of mentholated cigarettes; Arch. Oto-Laryngol. 56 (1952) 494–503. Ralapati, S.: High performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) for rapid monitoring of nicotine in ATFregulated tobacco products: A regulatory perspective; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 40, 1996, pp. 43–44. Ralapati, S.: High performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) for the quantitative analysis of nicotine in ATFregulated tobacco products: A regulatory proposal; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 57, 1997, p. 59. Ramusino, M.C., B.S. Dattilo, A. Lucibello, and S.G. Rossi: Determination of 25 low molecular weight
3076.
3077.
3078.
3079.
3080.
3081.
3082.
3083.
3084.
3085.
3086.
3087.
3088.
3089.
carbohydrates in tobacco by high performance ion chromatography; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 16 (1994) 77–84. Rand, H.J., E.T. Alvord, S.Z. Cardon, and A. Burhan: A study of cigarette smoke and cigarette paper smoke alone; Am. J. Surg. 94 (1957) 438–443. Rand, H.J., S.Z. Cardon, E.T. Alvord, and A. Burhan: A study of cigarette smoke and cigarette paper smoke alone; Cancer Cytol. 4 (1961) 18–21. Randolph, H.R.: A gas chromatographic determination of nicotine from an isopropyl alcohol extract of TPM; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 19, 1973, p. 12; A gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in an isopropyl alcohol extract of smoke particulate matter; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 133–135. Ratcliff, M.A., E.E. Medley, and P.G. Simmonds: Pyrolysis of amino acids. Mechanistic considerations; J Org Chem. 39 (1974) 1481–1490. Rathkamp, G., D.K. Chao, and D. Hoffmann: Analytical studies on nonvolatile N-nitrosamines in cigarette smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 26, 1973, p. 20. Rathkamp, G. and D. Hoffmann: The inhibition of the pyrosynthesis of several selective smoke components. Experimental findings and theoretical considerations; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 29, 1969, p. 21. Rathkamp, G. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XIII. Inhibition of the pyrosynthesis of several selective smoke constituents; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 302–306. Rathkamp, G. and D. Hoffmann: Fluorenes and fluoranthenes in cigarette smoke; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 28, 1970, p. 20. Rathkamp, G. and D. Hoffmann: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon profiles of tobacco smoke; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 9, 1972, p. 14. Rathkamp, G., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Experiments on the reduction of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 19, 1966, p. 23. Rathkamp, G., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Primary and secondary nitrohydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 25, 1967, p. 14; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. III. Primary and secondary nitroalkanes in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 124–134. Rathkamp, G., T.C. Tso, and D. Hoffmann: On the correlation between various leaf constituents and selected smoke components; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 6, 1971, p. 5. Rathkamp, G., T.C. Tso, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XX. Smoke analyses of cigarettes made from bright tobacco differing in variety and stalk position; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 179–189. Rayburn, C.H.: Tobacco smoke: Influence of certain variables on the composition of cigarette smoke; 4th
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1384
11/24/08 2:39:55 PM
1385
Bibliography
3090.
3091.
3092.
3093.
3093a.
3093b. 3093c.
3094.
3095.
3095a.
3096. 3097. 3097a.
3098. 3099. 3100.
3101.
3102.
Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 4, Paper No. 10, 1950. Rayburn, C.H.: Chemical analysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke: Determination of some volatile phenols in cigarette smoke; 6th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 6, Paper No. 10, 1952, p. 5; Rayburn, C.H., W.R. Harlan, and H.R. Hanmer: Determination of volatile phenols in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 25 (1953) 1419. Rayburn, C.H. and W.B. Wartman Jr: The effect of the paraffin hydrocarbons on a polycyclic hydrocarbon fraction in cigarette smoke; 11th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 11, Paper No. 14, 1957, p. 11. Rayburn, C.H., W.B. Wartman Jr, and P.M. Pedersen: Influence of hexane solubles in tobacco on a polycyclic fraction of cigarette smoke; 133rd Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., San Francisco, CA (April 15, 1958); Science 128 (1958) 1344–1345. Reddick, E.M., G.L. Dooly, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of phenols in sidestream cigarette smoke using a GC/MS technique; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 61, 2002, p. 57. Reddy, A.S. and T.L. Thomas: Expression of a cyanobacterial delta-6-desaturase gene results in gamma-linolenic acid production in transgenic plants; Nature Biotechnology 14 (1996) 639–642. Redtenbacher, J.: Identification of acrolein; Ann. Chem. Pharm. 47 (1843) 113. Reductase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term reductase aldose tobacco, reductase glyoxylate tobacco, etc. provides numerous references to the specified enzyme. Reece, J.B., C.H. Risner, and W.T. Morgan: A collaborative investigations of two tobacco TSNA methods; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 37, 2002, pp. 41–42. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS): 1985–1986 Edition User’s Guide; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 87–114 (1987). Reid, W.W. Jr: The polyphenols and polyphenolase of tobacco; Symp. Rpt. On Chemistry of Vegetable Tannins, 1956, 75–86; J. Soc.Leather Trades’ Chem. 40 (1956) 117. Reid, W.W. Jr: Some aspects of polyphenols of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 103–108. Reid, W.W. Jr: Biosynthesis of solanesol and sterols in tobacco plants; Chem. and Ind. (1961) 1489. Reid, W.W. Jr: The action of inhibitors on the incorporation of [214C] mevalonate into the triterpenes and sterols of Nicotiana tabacum; Biochem. J. 100 (1966) 13P. Reid, W.W. Jr: The phytochemistry of the genus Nicotiana; Ann. Tabac, SEITA, 1974(2) 145–178. Reid, W.W. Jr and D. Hellier: Resins of tobacco and tobacco smoke; Chem. and Ind. (1961) 1489–1490. Reif, G.: Die Bestimmung von Äthylenglykol im Tabakrauch mittels 2-Naphthol [Demonstration of ethylene glycol in tobacco smoke using 2-naphthol]; Pharmazie 4 (1949) 110–113. Reif, H.: The use of the ion-selective electrode for cyanide determination in cigarette smoke; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 13 (1972) 220–224. Reif, H. and H. Kuhn: Die Bestimmung von Kohlenmonoxid und Kohlendioxid in Zigarettenrauch
3103.
3104.
3104a.
3105.
3106.
3107.
3108.
3108a.
3109.
3110.
3111.
3112.
3113.
3114.
3115.
3116.
[The determination of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in cigarette smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 14 (1973) 239–251. Reigh, D.L., S. Wender, and E.C. Smith: Phenolic inhibition of isoperoxidase A3-catalyzed scopoletin oxidation; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 85–86. Remington, R.E.: A hitherto unsuspected source of arsenic in the human environment; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 49 (1927) 1410–1416. Resnik, F.E.: Thin layer chromatographic separation of benzo[a]pyrene from cigarette tar; Memorandum to R.M. Ikeda, November 8, 1965, see www.pmdocs.com 1001898073. Resnik, F.E., W.H. Danker, and F.L. Daylor: Flavour evaluation of cigarette smoke components; Proc. 3rd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Salisbury, Rhodesia, 1963 (1964) 522–533. Resnik, F.E. and J.C. Holmes: New techniques of smoke analysis. II. Mass spectrometric identification of smoke constituents from gas chromatography fractions; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 5, 1955, pp. 2–3. Resnik, F.C., L.A. Lee, and W.A. Powell: Chromatography of organic acids in cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 23–27. Resnik, F.E. and R.B. Seligman: New techniques of smoke analysis. III. Mass spectrometric identification of compounds separated by paper chromatography; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 6, 1955, p. 3 Reunova, G.D., A.G. Trubitsyn, and V.G. Reifman: Effect of actinomycin D on tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) accumulation in isolated tobacco protoplasts under varying light conditions; Virology 163 (1988) 198–200. Reuveni, M.and Y. Cohen: Growth retardation and changes in phenolic compounds with special reference to scopoletin in mildewed and ethylene-treated tobacco plants; Physiol. Plant Pathol. 12 (1978) 179–189. Reynolds, J.H. IV: A survey of the literature regarding carbon monoxide, with special reference to its occurrence in cigarette smoke and removal from smokes and gases; RDR, 1969, No. 6, February 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514901904 -1923. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Evaluation of filter additives for selective removal of phenols from cigarette smoke; RDM, 1970, No. 58, June 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614618 -4625. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Experiments in removal of CO from cigarette smoke; RDM, 1970, No. 81, August 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614900 -4904. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Evaluation of the Stanford Research Institute CO filter. I; RDM, 1970, No. 86, September 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614989 -4992. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Evaluation of the Stanford Research Institute CO filter. II; RDM, 1970, No. 87, September 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614993 -4998. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Evaluation of the Stanford Research Institute CO filter. III; RDM, 1970, No. 88, September 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614999 -5012. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Changes in smoke composition in air-diluted cigarettes; RDM, 1972, No. 54, December 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615891 -5902.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1385
11/24/08 2:39:55 PM
1386
3116a. Reynolds J.H. IV: Basic study of air dilution. I. Determination of air dilution volumes in cigarettes using a novel method; RDR, 1972, No. 20, November 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501002925 -2969. 3117. Reynolds, J.H. IV: Evaluation of the Stanford Research Institute CO filter. IV; RDM, 1975, No. 40, November 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511500239 -0246. 3118. Reynolds, J.H. IV and M.N. Andrews: Removal of carbon monoxide from cigarette smoke. II. Development and application of a rapid method for screening prospective carbon monoxide removal agents; RDR, 1971, No. 16, July 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514902024 -2043. 3119. Reynolds, J.H. IV and B.P. Hege: Experiments in removal of carbon monoxide from cigarette smoke. III. Successful catalytic removal of carbon monoxide from smoke; RDM, 1973, No. 120, March 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508566003 -6012. 3119a. Reynolds, J.H. IV and J.P. Wheeler: Basic study of air dilution. II. Some experimental air dilution filters; RDR, 1973, No. 5, August 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003079 -3100; III. Air dilution and gas and particulate phase product formation in a series of experimental air dilution cigarettes; RDR, 1973, No. 7, August 14, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501003133 -3166; IV. Study of the puffby-puff behavior of air diluted cigarettes; RDR, 1973, No. 6, September 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003101 -3132; V. Studies of gas flows in air diluted cigarettes. RDR, 1973, No. 8, October 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003167 -3207; VI. Simulation of air dilution by puff volume reduction; RDM, 1973, No. 30, October 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606288 -6300; VII. A more rapid method for the measurement of air dilution; RDM, 1975, No. 30, August 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616350 -6354. 3120. Reynolds, J.H. IV and J.P. Wheeler: A method for the study of air diluted cigarettes; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 14, 1976, p. 16; Tob. Sci. 21 (1977) 85–90. 3121. Reynolds, M.L.: Factors affecting the delivery of cigarette smoke vapor phase; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 21, 1965, pp. 31–33. 3121a. Reynolds, M.L.: Influence of filter additives on smoke composition; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 4 (1978) 47–67. 3122. Rhee, M.S.: Quantitative analysis of trans-unsaturated fatty acids in cigarette smoke; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper ST10, 72. 3123. Rhoades, J.W. and D.E. Johnson: Gas chromatography and selective detection of N-nitrosamines; J. Chromat. Sci. 8 (1970) 616–617. 3124. Rhoades, J.W. and D.E. Johnson: DMN in cigarette smoke; Chem. Eng. News (December 6, 1971) 15–16; N-Dimethylnitrosamine in tobacco smoke condensate; Nature 236 (1972) 307–308; Method for the determination of N-dimethylnitrosamine in tobacco smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1841–1843. 3125. Rhodes, P.R. and J.A. Saunders: Selective adsorption of nitrate and nitrite from tobacco leaf homogenates; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 21–27. 3126. Ribeiro, F.: The irritant action of cigar smoke; Arch. Hyg. Saude Publ. 2 (1937) 289–290, see Chem. Abstr. 33 (1939) 7959.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3126a. Ribonucleic acid clone: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term ribonucleic acid tobacco clone provides numerous references to the numerous variations of it. 3126b. Ricci, P., F. Trentin, P. Bonnet, P. Venard, F. MoutonPerronnet, and M. Bruneteau: Differential production of parasiticein, an elicitor of necrosis and resistance in tobacco, by isolates of Phytophthora parasitica; Plant Pathol. 41 (1992) 298–307. 3126c. Ricciuti, C. and C.O. Willits: Determination of nornicotine by amperometric titration; 4th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 4, Paper No. 6, 1950. 3127. Rice, E.W.: Furfural content of cigarette smoke and its determination; Proc Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 87 (1954) 533–535. 3128. Rice, J.E., E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Synthesis of isomeric phenols and the trans-2,3-diol of fluoranthene; J. Org. Chem. 48 (1983) 2360–2363. 3129. Rice, W.Y. Jr and J.R. Hayes: Comparison of paramagnetic radical species in the particulate and vapor phases of cigarettes that burn tobacco and cigarettes that heat tobacco; R&DM, 1989, No. 110, April 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506936759 -6761. 3130. Rice, W.Y. Jr, A.J. Sensabaugh Jr, M.L. Raker, and A.T. Ridings: Project RAN. I. Impact of smoking conditions and cigarette configuration on specific Ames activity of cigarette smoke condensate; R&DM, 1986, No. 7, January 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 514900672 -0688. 3131. Rice, W.Y. Jr, R.H. Steele, and J.R. Hayes: A comparison of smoke formation in tobacco burning cigarettes with smoke formation in the Premier; R&DM, 1989, No. 118, May 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508282934 -2943. 3132. Rickards, J.C. and W.F. Owens Jr: Effect of porous cigarette papers on the yield of the major vapor phase and certain particulate phase components of cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 20, 1966, p. 25; August 25, 1972 Revision. 3133. Rickert, W.S., K.S. Brown, R. Walker, and M.J. Kaiserman: Levels of ETS particulates, nicotine, and carbonyls in a random selection of homes in a midsize Canadian city; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 24, 1995, pp. 30–31. 3134. Rickert, W.S., P. Joza, and J. Wu: Determination of the amount of free radicals generated from gas phase and particulate phase in mainstream tobacco smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 14, 2004, pp. 28–29. 3135. Rickert, W.S. and M.J. Kaiserman: Cigarette emissions of fourteen ETS constituents by five types of cigarettes estimated from growth curves in a controlled environment; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 9, 1993, pp. 22–23. 3136. Rickert, W.S. and M.J. Kaiserman: Estimates of removal rates for fourteen constituents of ETS based on a nonlinear regression of growth curves; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 10, 1993, p. 23. 3137. Rickert, W.S. and M.J. Kaiserman: An assessment of the relative contributions of burning wood, candles, lamps,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1386
11/24/08 2:39:55 PM
1387
Bibliography
3138.
3139.
3140.
3141.
3142.
3143.
3144.
3144a.
3145.
3146.
3147.
incense, and cigarettes to levels of particulates, nicotine, benzo[a]pyrene, carbonyls, solanesol, HCN, benzene, NO and CO in ambient air; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 30, 1995, pp. 34–35. Rickert, W.S. and M.J. Kaiserman: Chemical characterization of cigarette tobacco and mainstream smoke from Canadian cigarettes: 1968 to 1994, 26 years of change; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 58, 1996, pp. 54–55. Rickert, W.S. and M.J. Kaiserman: A comparison of yields of “tar”, nicotine, and CO by 115 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under various conditions; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 7, 1997, pp. 26–27. Rickert, W.S. and M.J. Kaiserman: Development of a numerical index for expressing the relative toxicity of mainstream tobacco smoke based on chemical composition; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 63, 2003, p. 44. Rickert, W.S., R. Momin, A. Trivedi, and W. Wright: A comparative study of the mutagenicity of tar from cigarettes sold in Canada over the past three decades (1969/1970–2002); 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 42, 2003, pp. 44–45. Rickert, W.S., J.C. Robinson, D.F. Bray, B. Roberts, and N. Collishaw: Characterization of tobacco products: A comparative study of the tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yield of cigars, manufactured cigarettes and cigarettes made from fine cut tobacco; Prevent. Med. 14 (1985) 226–233. Rickert, W.S., J.C. Robinson, and N. Collishaw: Yields of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide in the sidestream smoke from 15 brands of Canadian cigarettes; Am. J. Publ. Hlth. 74 (1984) 228–231. Rickert, W.S., J.C. Robinson, and M.J. Kaiserman: Quantitation of “tar” color with specific reference to estimating yields, quantifying ETS and the production of color scales; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 36, 1994, pp. 45–46. Rickert, W.S., M. Shariel, J. Wu, and P. Joza: TSNAs in cigarette filler and mainstream smoke from Canadian cigarettes 2003–2006: A period of major change; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 52, 2006, p. 48. Rickert, W.S. and P.B. Stockwell: Automated determination of hydrogen cyanide, acrolein, and total aldehydes in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; J. Automation Chem. 1 (1979) 152–154. Rickert, W.S., A. Trivedi, and W. Wright: Effect of smoking condition and method of collection on TA 98 and TA 100 response to crude smoke condensate (CSC) from control cigarettes (Kentucky Reference 1R4F, 1R5F and a Canadian Flue-cured Monitor); 2002 CORESTA Congress, Paper ST 7. Rickert, W., A. Trivedi, and W. Wright: Specific activity (mutagenicity) of crude tobacco smoke condensate (CSC) in relation to method of collection, smoking
3148.
3148a.
3149.
3150.
3151.
3152.
3153.
3154.
3155.
3156.
3157.
3158.
conditions, and cigarette type; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 30, 2002, p. 36. Rickert, W.S., A. Trivedi, and W. Wright: Relative cytotoxicity of tobacco smoke vapour and particulate phases when cigarettes are smoked under ISO and Canadian intense conditions; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 15, 2003, p. 27. Rickert, W.S. and W. Wright: Yields of selected mainstream smoke constituents in relation to smoking regime and smoking machine type; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 55, 2006, pp. 49–50. Rickert, W.S., W. Wright, M. Bao, P. Joza, and M. Sharifi: Yield of selected carbonyls, NO, HCN and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from cigarettes sold in Canada (1969–2002); 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 41, 2003, p. 44. Richter, M.: Composition of essential oils in tobacco. 4. Analyses of the neutral fraction; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. (Dresden) 23 (1976) 44–57. Richter, M.: Über die gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Organochlor-Pestizidruckstandem im Tabak: Beschreibung einer Analysemethode für Serienbestimmungen [Determination of organochlorine pesticides in tobacco: Description of an analytical method for serial determinations]; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. (Dresden) 23 (1976) 37–43. Richter, M.: On the gas chromatographic determination of organochlorine pesticide residues in tobacco: Expansion of the analytical method for serial determinations; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. (Dresden) 24/25 (1977/1978) 80–84. Riehl, T.F.: Effect of plasticizers on menthol transfer to mainstream smoke; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 57, 1975, p. 37. Riehl, T.F., L.L. Shockley, and M.L. Reynolds: Menthol transfer; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 10, 1971, p. 7; Menthol distribution and transfer; Tob. Sci. 17 (1973) 10–11. Riemenschneider, R.W., R.M. Speck, and E.G. Beinhart: Analysis and fatty acid composition of tobacco-seed oils; Oil&Soap 22 (1945) 120–122. Riggs, D.M. and T.A. Perfetti: Thermochemical properties of nicotine salts; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 289–295. Rinkus, S.J. and M.S. Legator: Chemical characterization of 465 known or suspected carcinogens and their correlation with mutagenic activity in the Salmonella typhimurium system: Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 3289–3318, see Table 4, Compound 253. Risner, C.H.: The determination of benzo[a]pyrene and benz[a]anthracene in the total particulate matter of cigarette smoke by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1986, No. 143, September 2, see www. rjrtdocs.com 506472122 -2167; The determination of benzo[a]pyrene in the total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 39, 1986, p. 21; The determination of benzo[a]pyrene in the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1387
11/24/08 2:39:55 PM
1388
3159.
3160.
3161
3162.
3163.
3164.
3165.
3166.
3167.
3168.
3169.
3170.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
total particulate matter of cigarette smoke; J. Chromat. Sci. 26 (1988) 113–120. Risner, C.H.: Analysis of applied vanillin in tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1986, No. 114, August 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505448292 -8300. Risner, C.H.: Quantitation of some tobacco anions by eluent suppressed anion exchange chromatography using conventional liquid chromatography equipment; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 85–90. Risner, C.H.: A high-performance liquid chromatography method for the analysis of chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, 7-hydroxycoumarin, scopoletin, rutin and kaempferol 3-rutinoside, quercitin, and syringic acid in tobacco and other matrices; R&DM, 1988, No. 48, February 3, see www.rjrtdocs. com 506307056 -7080. Risner, C.H.: The determination of benzo[a]pyrene and benz[a]anthracene in mainstream and sidestream smoke of Reference Cigarette 1R4F and a cigarette which heats but does not burn tobacco: A comparison; R&DM, 1988, No. 173, June 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512059871 -9894; Risner, C.H.: The determination of benzo[a] pyrene and benz[a]anthracene in mainstream and sidestream smoke of Kentucky Reference Cigarette 1R4F and a cigarette which heats but does not burn tobacco: A comparison; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 15 (1991) 11–17. Risner, C.H.: A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of maltitol, glycerin, propylene glycol, and sorbitol in tobacco and maltol and sorbitol in raw materials; R&DM, 1989, No. 262, September 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508295580 -5603. Risner, C.H. and S. Cash: A high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of major phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke; J. Chromatog. Sci. 28 (1990) 239–243. Risner, C.H.: The quantification of hydroquinone, catechol, phenol, 3-methylcatechol, and m- + p- cresol in indoor air; J. Liq. Chrom. 16 (1991) 4117–4140. Risner, C.H.: An improved method for the quantification of selected phenolic compounds in ambient air; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 8, 1992, p. 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509328661 -8661. Risner, C.H.: Collection and ion chromatographic determination of nitrous acid in air; Tob. Sci. 37 (1993) 49–53. Risner, C.H.: The determination of scopoletin in indoor air; R&DM, 1993, No. 6, March 26, see www.rjrtdocs. com 508398264 -8306; The determination of scopoletin in environmental tobacco smoke by high-performance liquid chromatography; J. Liq. Chrom. 17 (1994) 2723– 2736; Risner, C.H., S.V. Parsons, and L.S. Winkler: The determination of scopoletin in mainstream tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 38 (1994) 68–71. Risner, C.H.: High performance liquid chromatographic determination of major carbonyl compounds from various sources in ambient air; J. Chrom. Sci. 33 (1995) 168–176. Risner, C.H.: The determination of +A-tocopherol in tobacco and mainstream tobacco smoke; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 46, 1996, p. 47; Risner, C.H.
3171.
3172.
3173.
3174.
3175.
3176.
3176a.
3177. 3178.
3179.
3180.
and P.R. Nelson: The determination of +A-tocopherol in environmental tobacco smoke; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 48, 1997, p. 54; Tob. Sci. 41 (1997) 53–61. Risner, C.H. and S.L. Cash: A high performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of hydroquinone, resorcinol, catechol, phenol, m- + p-cresol, and o-cresol in tobacco smoke; R&DM, 1988, No. 233, September 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 507039723 -9766. Risner, C.H. and S.L. Cash: The determination of major phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 43, 1988, p. 38, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521041715 -1738. Risner, C.H. and S.L. Cash: A high performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of hydroquinone, catechol, phenol, and m- p-cresol in environmental tobacco smoke; R&DM, 1989, No. 184, July 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508290988 -1013; The determination of hydroquinone, catechol, phenol, and mp-cresols in indoor air samples by high performance liquid chromatography; Environ. Tech. 11 (1990) 345–352. Risner, C.H. and S.L. Cash: The quantification of ETS phenols; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 52, 1989, p. 41, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521136621 -6650. Risner, C.H. and S.L. Cash: A high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of major phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke; J. Chromat. Sci. 28 (1990) 239–244. Risner, C.H. and J.M. Conner: Quantification of 4- to 6-ring polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor air; R&DM, 1990, No. 162, August 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508386153 -6192; The quantification of 4- to 6-ring polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor air samples; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 31, 1990, p. 26; The quantification of 4- to 6-ring polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor air samples by high-performance liquid chromatography; J. Liq. Chrom. 14 (1991) 437–464. Risner, C.H., J.B. Reece, and W.T. Morgan: The determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in tobacco: A collaborative investigation of current methodology; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 27 (2001) 47–73. Risner, C.H. and F.N. Wendelboe: Quantification of tobacco-specific nitrosamines; Tob. Sci. 38 (1994) 1–5. Rivenson, A., M.V. Djordjevic, S. Amin, and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. XLIV. Bioassay in A/J mice of some N-nitrosamines; Cancer Lett. 47 (1989) 111–114. Rivenson, A., K. Furuya, S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Experimental nasal cavity tumors induced by tobaccospecific nitrosamines; Nasal Tumors Anim. Man 3 (1983) 79–113. Rivenson, A., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Observations on lung tumors arising from metaplastic squamous epithelium in rats treated chronically with the tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine 4-methylnitrosamino-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone NNK; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 29 (1988) 86.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1388
11/24/08 2:39:55 PM
Bibliography
3181. Rivenson, A., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Tumors induced by tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines; J. Cancer Res. Clin, Oncol. 116 (Suppl. Pt. 2) (1990) 1088. 3182. Rivenson, A., S.S. Hecht, and D. Hoffmann: Carcinogenicity of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNA): The role of the vascular network in the selection of target organs; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 21 (1991) 255–264. 3183. Rivenson, A., D. Hoffmann, and S.S. Hecht: Local and regional tumors induced by smokeless tobacco and its components in Fischer rats; 14th Internat. Cancer Cong., Budapest, Hungary (1986). 3184. Rivenson, A., D. Hoffmann, B. Prokopczyk., S. Amin, and S.S. Hecht: Induction of lung and pancreas tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific and areca-derived N-nitrosamines; Cancer Res. 48 (1988) 6912–6917. 3184a. Rivera, J.A.: Cilia, ciliated epithelium, and ciliary activity; Pergamom Press, New York, NY (1962). 3185. Rivers, J.M.: Investigation of Turkish tobacco for presence of 2,3,4,6-O-isovaleryl-d-glucopyranose (M-13) and related acid carriers; RDR, 1980, No. 3, August 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501005935 -5966; Low molecular weight fatty acid sugar esters in Turkish tobacco. Separation by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography and spectral characterization; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 39, 1981, p. 20. 3186. Rix, C.E.: Headspace analysis of tobacco using “Tenax”as an adsorbent for volatile collection; RDM, 1974, No. 15, May 15. 3187. Rix, C.E.: The addition of ammonia, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, and acrolein to mainstream smoke by means of air dilution; RDM, 1976, No. 2, January 9, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500616571 -6591; The addition of furfural, acetic acid, water, crotonaldehyde, menthol, phenol, and hydrogen sulfide to mainstream smoke by means of air dilution; RDM, 1977, No. 16, May 9, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500617214 -7237. 3188. Rix, C.E., R.A. Lloyd Jr, and C.W. Miller: Headspace analysis of tobacco with Tenax® traps; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 21, 1976, p. 19; Tob. Sci. 21 (1977) 93–96. 3188a. Rix, C.E. and A.M. Slater: Development of an analysis for nineteen organochlorine pesticides in tobacco; ACD, 1993, No. 004, January 21, see www. rjrtdocs. com 509697273 -7297. 3189. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Ashburn, J.G. and A. Rodgman): Procedimento per il trattamento di tobacco [Process for the treatment of tobacco]. Italian Patent No. 593,317 (March 5, 1959). 3190. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company: Chemical and biological studies on new cigarette prototypes that heat instead of burn tobacco; R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC (1988). 3191. Robb, E.W., G.C. Guvernator III, M.D. Edmonds, and A. Bavley: Improved methods for determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke; CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964); Analysis of polycyclic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Report, 1963, see www.pmdocs.com 1001895592/5611; Analysis of polycyclic hydrocarbons; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 278–284.
1389
3192. Robb, E.W., W.R. Johnson, J.J. Westbrook III, and R.B. Seligman: Model pyrolysis: The study of cellulose; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1075–1085; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 577–610. 3193. Robb, E.W., J.J. Westbrook III, and A. Bavley: The use of non-volatile adducts in smoke flavor; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 3–7. 3194. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. I. Isolation procedures, previously known compounds, and diterpenic glycols; RDR, 1960, No. 34, October 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500935009 -5029. 3195. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. II. Characterization of two diterpenoids, A- and B-1,3duvenediol, as cyclotetradecyl glycols; RDR, 1961, No. 34, July 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936829 -6846. 3196. Roberts, D.L.: Isolation, identification, and synthesis of dihydrobovolide; RDM, 1962, No. 86, September 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612198 -2200. 3197. Roberts, D.L.: Macrocyclic diterpenes, A- and B-4,8,13duvatriene-1,3-diols, from tobacco; RDR, 1962, No. 36, October 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500939614 -9636. 3198. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. III. Studies on condensate from the denicotinization process; RDR, 1963, No. 23, March 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961418 -1447. 3199. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. IV. Isolation, characterization, and synthesis of compound BV-20; RDR, 1963, No. 44, June 6, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500961892 -1897. 3200. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. V. Isolation, characterization, and synthesis of compound BV-21; RDR, 1963, No. 49, July 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961976 -1983. 3201. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. VI. Isolation, characterization, and synthesis of 2-acetyl-5-methylpyrrole; RDR, 1963, No. 59, November 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500962164 -2181. 3202. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. VII. Isolation, characterization, and synthesis of 2-acetylpyrazine; RDR, 1963, No. 60, December 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500962182 -2187. 3203. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. VIII. Isolation, characterization and synthesis of two pyrrolecarboxaldehydes; RDR, 1964, No. 1, January 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500963219 -3226. 3204. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. IX. Further isolation and synthesis of 2-acetylpyrazine and related compounds; RDR, 1964, No. 9, February 11, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500963380 -3391. 3205. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. X. Components of condensate from denicotinization process, 1963; RDM, 1964, No. 28, March 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602185 -2195. 3206. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. XI. Isolation and synthesis of tobacco constituents; RDR, 1964, No. 47, October 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500964124 -4139. 3207. Roberts, D.L.: Preparation of the G-lactone and G-lactam of methyl-4-oxo-2-hexanoic acid; J. Org. Chem. 29 (1964) 2785. 3208. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. XII. Synthesis and characterization related to SM2C; RDR, 1965, No. 5, January 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965598 -5605.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1389
11/24/08 2:39:56 PM
1390
3209. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. XIII. Attempted synthesis of SM40C; RDR, 1965, No. 9, February 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965629 -5638. 3210. Roberts, D.L.: Burley tobacco components. XIV. Attempted synthesis of isophorone-related compounds; RDR, 1965, No. 12, February 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965690 -5701. 3211. Roberts, D.L.: The structure of a new sesquiterpene—1keto-A-cyperone - isolated from tobacco; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 17, 1971, p. 11. 3212. Roberts, D.L.: The structure of a new sesquiterpene isolated from tobacco; Phytochem, 11 (1972) 2077–2080. 3213. Roberts, D.L.: Chemical and physical modification of tobacco. Literature survey; RDM, 1972, No. 49, October 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615796 -5833. 3214. Roberts, D.L.: Ammonia and nicotine migration in tobacco; RDM, 1974, No. 11, April 8, see www.rjrtdocs. com 514901109 -1114. 3215. Roberts, D.L.: Natural tobacco flavor; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 14 (1988) 49–81. 3216. Roberts, D.L., R.A. Heckman, B.P. Hege, and S.A. Bellin: Synthesis of (RS)-abscisic acid; J. Org. Chem. 33 (1968) 3566–3569. 3217. Roberts, D.L. and C.E. Lewis: Tobacco and stem essential oils; RDR, 1974, No. 2, January 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510646975 -6985. 3218. Roberts, D.L., C.W. Miller, and R.A. Lloyd Jr: Tobacco carotenoids; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 43, 1973, p. 29. 3219. Roberts, D.L. and W.A. Rohde: Isolation and identification of flavor components of burley tobacco; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 107–112. 3220. Roberts, D.L. and R.L. Rowland: Characterization of M-II-f as A-3,8,14-duvatriene-1,5-diol; RDR, 1962, No. 29, August 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500939496 -9504. 3221. Roberts, D.L. and R.L. Rowland: Macrocyclic diterpenes. A- and B-4,8,13-duvatriene-1,3-diols from tobacco; J. Org. Chem. 27 (1962) 3989–3995. 3222. Roberts, D.L. and J.N. Schumacher: Isolation and characterization of compound XI. A macrocyclic diterpene isolated from tobacco; RDR, 1963, No. 26, April 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961494 -1500. 3223. Roberts, D.L. and J.N. Schumacher: Isolation, characterization and synthesis of compound XXVI; RDR, 1963, No. 36, May 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961631 -1648. 3224. Roberts, D.L., J.N. Schumacher, R.A. Lloyd Jr, R.A. Heckman, and A. Rodgman: List of tobacco and smoke constituents; RDM, 1975, No. 15, April 16, see www. rjrtdocs.com 514901435 -1636. 3225. Roberts, D.L., J.N. Schumacher, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and R.A. Heckman: Carbohydrate pyrolysis products: A review of the literature; RDM, 1976, No. 7, February 4, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500616624 -6642. 3226. Roberts, D.L., J.N. Schumacher, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and R.A. Heckman: Literature study of pyrolysis of amino acids and proteins; RDM, 1976, No. 9, February 11, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500616651 -6671. 3227. Roberts, D.L., J.N. Schumacher, R.A. Lloyd Jr, and R.A. Heckman: Nicotine pyrolysis products: A review of the literature; RDM, 1977, No. 5, January 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009926 -9932, 504019634 -9640.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3228. Roberts, K.C. and P. Watts: The automatic gas chromatograph analysis of water, menthol, phenol, nicotine and triacetin in the ethanol extract of tobacco smoke condensate; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 40, 1975, p. 28. 3229. Robertson, L.S.: Carcinogens in cigarette smoke; South Afr. Tydsk. Geneeskunde (1964) 617. 3230. Robinson, D.P., M.A.J. Bevan, and C.F. Hewett: An assessment of solanesol as a marker for environmental tobacco smoke; 46th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 46, Paper No. 7, 1992, p. 23. 3231. Robinson, M.F.: Determination of selected carbonyl components in sidestream smoke; R&DM, 1986, No. 83, May 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 50493 8679–8690. 3232. Rocchietta, S.: Recent research on the identification of 3,4-benzpyrene in the components of tobacco smoke; Minerva Med. (Torino) 47 (1956) 1831. 3233. Rodgman, A.: Carcinogens and carcinogen precursors present in tobacco substances: A survey; Memorandum, 15 October 1954, pp. 1–59. 3234. Rodgman, A.: The carcinogenicity of arsenic compounds; Memorandum, 18 October, 1954, pp. 1–16. 3235. Rodgman, A.: The carcinogenicity of 3,4-benzpyrene; Memorandum, 18 October 1954, pp. 1–13. 3235a. Rodgman, A.: The synthesis of various substituted phenols for use as flavorants in tobacco products; RDM, 1954, No. 31, December 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610091 -0108. 3236. Rodgman, A.: The fractionation of cigarette smoke and tars; RDM, 1955, No. 13, April 29, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501009739 -9746. 3237. Rodgman, A.: Chemical and biological investigations of tobacco tar and smoke; Memorandum, August 1955, pp. 1–26, see http://tobaccodocuments.org/bliley_rjr/list 500185802 -5849, 502815162 -5189. 3237a. Rodgman, A.: Chemical carcinogenesis; Memorandum, September 1955, pp. 1–69, see http://tobaccodocuments. org/bliley_rjr/list 500508429 -8497, 502815208 -5279. 3238. Rodgman, A.: Arsenic or arsenic compounds: Carcinogenesis studies; Memorandum, October 1955, pp. 1–10, see http://tobaccodocuments.org/bliley_rjr/list 502815457 -5460, 502815461 -5471. 3239. Rodgman, A.: Data discussed by Dr. Ernst L. Wynder in speech “Human and experimental relationship of cancer and tobacco” presented at the symposium on “Tobacco” before the Metropolitan Long Island Subsection of the American Chemical Society, February 24, 1956; RDM, 1956, No. 9, March 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009747 -9754. 3240. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. I. The isolation and/or identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Camel cigarette smoke; RDR, 1956, No. 9, September 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008241 -8293. 3240a. Rodgman, A.: The preparation of some phenolic flavorants; RDR, 1956, No. 10, October 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500930142 -0155. 3241. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. II. The pretreatment of Camel blend tobacco; RDR, 1956, No. 12, November 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008294 -8336, 504912107 -2148, 515839741 -9783.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1390
11/24/08 2:39:56 PM
Bibliography
3242. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. III. Flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1957, No. 4, March 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008337 -8377. 3243 Rodgman, A.: Tobacco tar fractionation and the pretreatment of tobacco: A conversation with Dr. George F Wright of the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; RDM, 1957, No. 25, July 22, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500610651 -0656. 3244. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. IV. 3,4,8,9-Dibenzpyrene in Camel cigarette smoke condensate; RDR, 1957, No. 13, October 7, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501008378 -8386. 3245. Rodgman, A.: Components reported in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1958, No. 32, April 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610933 -0997. 3246. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. VI. The influence of solvent pretreatment of tobacco and other factors on the polycyclic hydrocarbon content of smoke condensate; RDR, 1959, No. 1, January 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008529 -8591. 3247. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. IX. Phytadienes; RDR, 1959, No. 11, May 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933338 -3372; The composition of cigarette smoke. III. Phytadienes; J. Org. Chem. 24 (1959) 1916–1924. 3248. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. X. The effect of porous paper and/or filter tip materials or aluminized paper and/or alumina additive (Reynolds Metals Company) on total polycyclic hydrocarbons; RDM, 1959, No. 80, July 16, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501009793 -9797. 3249. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XIX. The determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; RDR, 1961, No. 1, January 6, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500935976 -5996. 3250. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXIII. Polycyclic hydrocarbons in Lark cigarette smoke; RDM, 1963, No. 37, May 13, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500612598 -2601. 3251. Rodgman, A.: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXV. A summary of an eight-year study; RDR, 1964, No. 10, February 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008855 -8928. 3252. Rodgman, A.: Components reported in tobacco smoke: An addendum; RDM, 1965, No. 59, August 6, see www. rjrtdocs.com 504381941 -1944. 3253. Rodgman, A.: Components reported in tobacco smoke: An addendum; RDM, 1967, No. 58, September 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613525 -3528. 3253a. Rodgman, A.: Chemical composition and biological properties of tobacco smoke; Presentation to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D Personnel (April, 1985). 3254. Rodgman, A.: G13-expanded tobacco and Freon 11®; R&DM, 1984, No. 6, February 13; G13-expanded tobacco and Freon 11®; December, 1972, pp. 1–66, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189661 -9727; G13-expanded tobacco and Freon 11®, 1st Revision; February, 1974, pp. 1–77, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189578 -9660; G13-Expanded tobacco and Freon 11®, 2nd Revision; October, 1977, pp. 1–152, see www.rjrtdocs.com 515991960 -2115; G13-expanded tobacco and Freon 11®, 3rd Revision; December, 1979, pp. 1–104, see www.rjrtdocs.com 515979463 -9566.
1391
3255. Rodgman, A.: A comparison of the chemical, physical, and biological properties of cigarette mainstream smoke (MS), cigarette sidestream smoke (SS), and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); Report submitted to the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (December 1991; revised July 1992), pp. i-vii + 1–117, see www.rjrtdocs. com 512527469 -7599, 521184527 -4657, 521187004 -7125. 3255a. Rodgman, A.: Environmental tobacco smoke; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 16 (1992) 223–244. 3256. Rodgman, A.: The N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; October, 1993: pp. i-xv, 1–259, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509752851 -3134, 522101837 -2121. 3257. Rodgman, A.: The chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke: Some comments on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s notice on “Indoor Air Quality”; Document submitted to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 5 August, 1994, pp. i-xiii + 1–172, see www.rjrtdocs.com. 515923456 -3645, 515926646 -6833, 517582702 -2904, 521186677 -6881, 521187802 -7991. 3258. Rodgman, A.: FTC “tar” and nicotine in cigarette mainstream smoke: A retrospective; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 23 (1997) 5–74, see pp. 49–52. 3259. Rodgman, A.: Comments on BPDE experiments of Denissenko et al.; Memorandum (November 26, 1996), pp. 1–10. 3260. Rodgman, A.: Tobacco smoke components. Letter to the Editor; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1998) 127–129. 3261. Rodgman, A.: “Smoke pH”: A review; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2000) 117–139; Erratum notice; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 229–235. 3262. Rodgman, A.: Studies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette mainstream smoke: Identification, tobacco precursors, control of levels: A review; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 361–379. 3263. Rodgman, A.: Some studies of the effects of additives on cigarette mainstream smoke properties. I. Flavorants; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 83–103. 3264. Rodgman, A.: Some studies of the effects of additives on cigarette mainstream smoke properties. II. Casing materials and humectants; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 279–299. 3265. Rodgman, A.: The composition of cigarette smoke: Problems with lists of tumorigens; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 402–437. 3266. Rodgman, A.: Some studies of the effects of additives on cigarette mainstream smoke properties. III. Ingredients reportedly used in various commercial cigarette products in the USA and elsewhere; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 47–104. 3267. VOID 3268. Rodgman, A. and C.K. Chappell: Stigmasterol and B-sitosterol from Camel cigarette smoke; RJRT Notebook 56151–56156 (April, 1957). 3269. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. V. The polycyclic hydrocarbon precursors in tobacco; RDR, 1958, No. 18, December 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008387 -8441, 504912197 -2250. 3270. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. VII. Solanesol and solanesyl acetate; RDR, 1958, No. 22, December 31, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500932470 -2484; The composition of cigarette smoke. I. Solanesyl acetate; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 86–88.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1391
11/24/08 2:39:56 PM
1392
3271. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XI. A-Tocopherol; RDR, 1959, No. 23, September 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933614 -3620; The composition of cigarette smoke. IV. A-Tocopherol; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 7–8. 3272. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XIII. Sclareolide from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1960, No. 8, April 1, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500934533 -4541. 3273. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XIV. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; RDR, 1960, No. 20, May 26, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501008592 -8660. 3274. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XVII. The effect of aluminasupported catalysts on total polycyclic hydrocarbons; RDR, 1960, No. 36, December 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008682 -8694. 3275. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XVIII. Chloranil and 2,4,7-trinitrofluorenone as filter tip additives; RDR, 1960, No. 38, December 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008695 -8704. 3276. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XX. A note on the normal longchained primary alcohols: An addendum to RDR, 1960, No. 22; RDR, 1961, No. 5, January 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936097 -6106. 3277. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXI. Phenols; RDR, 1961, No. 10, February 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008731 -8772. 3278. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXIV. 6-Acetyl-2,3,4-tris-dB-methylvaleryl-B-D-glucopyranoside from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 42, August 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500937292 -7299. 3279. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXVI. Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1962, No. 14, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938892 -8910; The composition of cigarette smoke. XI. Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds from Turkish tobacco smoke; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 23, 1962, p. 14, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189920 -9945; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 176–179. 3280. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXVII. Phenols from Turkish tobacco smoke: Eugenol and isoeugenol; RDR, 1962, No. 15, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008799 -8811; Eugenol and isoeugenol from Turkish tobacco smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 22, 1964, pp. 33–35, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188506 -8516; The composition of cigarette smoke. XIII. Eugenol and isoeugenol from Turkish tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 161–162. 3281. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The composition of cigarette smoke. X. 12A-Hydroxy-13-epimanoyl oxide from Turkish tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 125–126. 3282. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXIX. Phytol (3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol); RDR, 1963, No. 9, February 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961174 -1190.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3283. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXI. A-1,5-Dimethyl-12-isopropyl9-methylene-5,8-oxido-3,13-cyclotetradecadien-1-ol and A-12-isopropyl-5,9-oxido-1,5,9-trimethyl-3,9,13cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1963, No. 24, March 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961449 -1470. 3284. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXII. Isoprenoid alcohols; RDR, 1963, No. 35, May 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961612 -1629. 3285. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: Unsaturated alcohols from Turkish tobacco smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 17, 1963, p. 14, see www.rjrtdocs. com 521340001 -0012; The composition of cigarette smoke. XII. Unsaturated alcohols from Turkish tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 151–157. 3286. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The composition of cigarette smoke; Presented at Sigma Xi Meeting, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 17 March, 1965, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501521599 -1606; the American Chemical Society Section Meeting, Columbus, GA, 2 May 1968, and the Chemistry Club, Chemistry Department, Columbus College, Columbus, GA, 2 May 1968, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501521608 -1615; and the Central North Carolina Section Meeting, American Chemical Society, Greensboro, NC, 14 October 1969, for presentation text and slides, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501521658 -1700. 3287. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXVII. A phytyl ester fraction from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 37, August 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188824 -8843; Some ketones and phytyl esters from Turkish tobacco smoke; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 30, 1965, p. 45, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188860 -8878; The composition of cigarette smoke. XV. Phytyl esters from Turkish tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 158–165. 3288. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXXIV. 4-(2-Butenylidene)-isophorones from Turkish tobacco smoke; RDR, 1966, No. 3, February 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966768 -6776. 3289. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: Some factors influencing the filtration of the vapor phase of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1966, No. 12, April 13 [Paper XXXVIII in the series The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate], see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188922 -8970. 3290. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: Treatment of 44X fluecured tobacco with hydrogen cyanide: Its effect on hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke; RDM, 1967, No. 52, September 14 [Paper XLI in the series The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate], see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188989 -8994. 3291. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The composition of cigarette smoke. Precursor studies; Unpublished manuscript, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501525257 -5284, 521184403 -4430. 3292. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The composition of cigarette smoke. Some minor components of the neutralacidic fraction; Unpublished manuscript, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501525285 -5340, 521184431 -4483.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1392
11/24/08 2:39:56 PM
1393
Bibliography
3293. Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: Branch-chained acids in Turkish tobacco smoke; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 19, 1968, p. 11. 3294. Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, S.A. Bellin, S.S. Mims, and G.W. Young: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXII. The composition of an aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco and tobacco smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 15, March 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521188124 -8152; The composition of cigarette smoke. IX. The composition of an aliphatic ester fraction from tobacco and tobacco smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 9, 1961, p. 5; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 42–49. 3295. Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, and C.K. Chappell: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XV. Comparison of different tobacco types; RDR, 1960, No. 21, June 30, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504912459 -2475; The composition of cigarette smoke. VI. Comparison of different tobacco types; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 29, 1960, p. 15; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 1–5. 3296. Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, and P.H. Latimer: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. VIII. Solanesyl esters and phytosteryl esters; RDR, 1959, No. 2, February 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933072 -3093; The composition of cigarette smoke. II. Solanesyl and phytosteryl esters; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 125–128. 3297. Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, and S.S. Mims: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XII. Squalenes and solanesenes; RDR, 1960, No. 3, February 10, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500934455 -4473; The composition of cigarette smoke. V. Solanesenes; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 23, 1960, pp. 12–13; J. Org. Chem. 26 (1961) 497–501. 3298. Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, and M.A. Wagoner: The effect of Lexan® on cigarette smoke; RDM, 1967, No. 74, November 21 [Paper XLVIII in the series The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate], see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613647 -3650. 3299. Rodgman, A., L.C. Cook, and G.W. Young: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XVI. Normal longchained primary alcohols; RDR, 1960, No. 22, July 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500934833 -4847. 3299a. Rodgman, A., J.D. Fredrickson, E.S. Hickman, M.P. Newell, J.N. Schumacher, C.R. Green, F.W. Best, G.W. Spence, R.E. Shackelford, E.D. Harper, and L.L. Vestal: The Sutton Research Corporation smoking material; RDR, 1970, No. 48, December 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001173 -1175, 501001176 -1189, 501001190 -1289, 501001290 -1406, 501001407 -1438, 501001439 -1463, 501001464 -1468, 501001469 -1475, 501001526 -1539, 501001540 -1591, 501001592 -1772, 501001773 -1783, 501001784 -1788. 3300. Rodgman, A. and C.R. Green: Toxic chemicals in cigarette mainstream smoke- hazard and hoopla; in: Cigarette risk and the potential for risk reduction; Proceedings of the 2002 CORESTA Congress, New Orleans, LA, pp. 2–52, see www.rjrtdocs.com 526909637 -9687; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 481–545. 3300a. Rodgman, A., P. Martin, T.A. Perfetti, C.J. Smith, G.A. Long, and C. Hansch: Molecular parameters reported for a series of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). II;
3301.
3302.
3303.
3304.
3305.
3306.
3306a.
3306b.
3307.
3308.
3309.
3310.
3311.
3312.
3313.
3314.
59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 22, 2005, pp. 29–30. Rodgman, A. and W.W. Menz: Components reported in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1960, No. 47, May 27, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500600177 -0313. Rodgman, A., W.W. Menz, J.M. DeTombe, and G.A. Konstantinow: Components reported in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1965, No. 41, June 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602714 -3093. Rodgman, A., W.W. Menz, F.E. Huffmann, and E.N. Smith: Components reported in tobacco smoke; RDM, 1962, No. 43, May 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601332 -1501. Rodgman, A., W.W. Menz, and G.A. Konstantinow: Components reported in tobacco smoke. Supplement I. Components reported from May 1962 to April 1963; RDM, 1963, No. 32, May 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612532 -2587. Rodgman, A. and S.S. Mims: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XXVIII. Possible precursors in tobacco of phenols in smoke; RDR, 1963, No. 1, January 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501008812 -8830. Rodgman, A., S.S. Mims, and L.C. Cook: Some comments on ciliary inhibition; RDM, 1964, No. 45, April 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602286 -2294. Rodgman, A. and T.A. Perfetti: The composition of cigarette smoke: A catalogue of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2006) 13–69. Rodgman, A. and T.A. Perfetti: The composition of cigarette smoke: A chronology of the studies of four polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2006) 208–254. Rodgman, A., C.J. Smith, and T.A. Perfetti: The composition of cigarette smoke: A retrospective, with emphasis on polycyclic components; Human Exptl. Toxicol. 19 (2000) 573–595. Rodgman, A. and B.W. Woosley: Components reported in tobacco smoke: A supplement to RDM, 1965, No. 41; RDM, 1967, No. 15, March 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612947 -3178. Rodriguez, B.K. and S.A. Bellin: Niacin and niacinamide in flue-cured cigarette smoke condensate; RDM, 1960, No. 64, August 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500600367 -0381. Roe, F.J.C.: The role of 3,4-benzopyrene in carcinogenesis by tobacco smoke condensate; Nature 194 (1962) 1089–1090. Roe, F.J.C.: Role of 3,4-benzopyrene in carcinogenesis by tobacco smoke condensate; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 19 (1963) 730. Roe, F.J.C.: Carcinogenicity of combination of cigarette smoke condensate and air pollutants; Med. Res. Council Ann. Rpt. April 1965-March 1966 (1966): 234. Roe, F.J.C., E. Boyland, and J.W. Gorrod: The importance of looking for further carcinogens in tobacco smoke, and the possible role of nitrosoanabasine; in: Compounds having alkylating action, Verband der Cigarettenindustrie, Hamburg, West Germany (1964) pp. 85–92. Roe, F.J.C., N.H. Salaman, J. Cohen, and J.G. Burgan: Incomplete carcinogens in cigarette smoke condensate: Tumour promotion by a phenolic fraction; Brit. J. Cancer 13 (1959) 623–633.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1393
11/24/08 2:39:56 PM
1394
3314a. Roemer, E. and U. Hackenberg: Mouse skin bioassay of smoke condensates from cigarettes containing different levels of cocoa; Food Addit. Contam. 7 (1990) 563–569. 3315. Roeraade, J. and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 14. Sampling, concentration, and examination of tobacco headspace vapors; J. Agr. Food Chem. 20 (1972) 1035–1039. 3316. Roffo, A.E.: Espectrograffe de los derivados obtenidos por destilacion directa de los tabacos y su relacion como agentes carcinogenos [Spectrograph of derivatives obtained by direct distillation of tobaccos and the relation to carcinogenic agents]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 14 (1937) 311–399, see Chem. Abstr. 32 (1938) 38123. 3317. Roffo, A.E.: El óxido de carbono en la sangre de los fumadoress [Carbon monoxide in the blood of smokers]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 14 (1938) 689–709, 17 (1940) 282. 3318. Roffo, A.E.: Espectrograffe de los derivados obtenidos por destilacion directa de los tabacos y su relacion como agentes carcinogenos [Spectrograph of derivatives obtained by direct distillation of tobaccos and the relation to carcinogenic agents]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 17 (1940) 279. 3319. Roffo, A.H.: Leucoplasia tabaquica experimental [Experimental tobacco-induced leukoplasia]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 7 (1930) 130–144, see Chem. Abstr. 29 (1935) 59285. 3320. Roffo, A.H.: Durch Tabak beim Kaninchen entwickeltes Carcinom [Initiation of carcinomas in rabbits with tobacco]; Z. Krebsforsch. 33 (1931) 321–332. 3321. Roffo, A.H.: El tabaco como cancerigeno [Tobacco as a carcinogen]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 13 (1936) 287–336. 3322. Roffo, A.H.: Der Tabak als krebserzeugendes Agens [Tobacco as a cancer-inducing agent]; Deut. Med. Wchnschr. 63 (1937) 1267–1271. 3323. Roffo, A.H.: Krebserzeugendes Benzpyren gewonnen aus Tabakteer [Cancer-causing benzpyrene obtained from tobacco tar]; Z. Krebsforsch. 49 (1939) 588–597, see Biol. Abstr. 14 (1939) 16122. 3324. Roffo, A.H.: Krebserzeugende Einheit der verschiedener Tabakteere [Uniform cancer-causing properties of different tobacco tars]; Deut. Med. Wchnschr. 65 (1939) 963-967, see Chem. Abstr. 33 (1939) 94197; Unidad cancerígena de los alquitranes de diversos tipos de tabacos [Uniform carcinogenicity of the tars from different tobacco types]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 15 (1939) 349-406, see Chem. Abstr. 33 (1939) 59068; Prensa Méd. Argent. 26 (1939) 721-737, see Chem. Abstr. 34 (1940) 71204. 3325. Roffo, A.H.: 1,2-Benzopirene: Cancerigeno extraido del alquitran del tabaco [1,2-Benzpyrene: A carcinogen extracted from tobacco tar]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cáncer 16 (1939) 1–38. 3326. Roffo, A.H.: Über die Prinzipien der krebserzeugenden Wirkung des Tabaks [The principles of cancer production by tobacco]; Schweiz. Med. Wchnschr. 71 (1941) 549–552, see Chem. Abstr. 36 (1942) 1434. 3327. Roffo, A.H.: El alquitran de tabaco extraido y la disminucion de cancerizacion [The tar from extracted tobacco and the diminution of carcinogenesis]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 19 (1942) 431–502. 3327a. Rogge, W.F., L.M. Hildemann, M.A. Masurek, and G.R. Cass: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 6. Cigarette
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3327b.
3328.
3329.
3330.
3331.
3332.
3333.
3333a.
3334.
3335.
3336.
3337.
3338.
3339.
3340.
3340a.
smoke in the urban atmosphere; Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (1994) 1375–1388. Rogge, W.F., L.M. Hildemann, M.A. Masurek, G.R. Cass, and B.R.T. Simonelt: Sources of fine organic aerosol. 4. Particulate abrasion products from leaf surfaces of urban plants; Environ. Sci. Technol. 27 (1993) 2700–2711. Rohde, W.A.: Burley tobacco constituents. I. Survey of separation and isolation of the methanol extractables; RDR, 1961, No. 57, December 11, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500937716 -7737. Rohde, W.A.: Burley tobacco constituents. II. Survey of separation and isolation of the chloroform extractables; RDR, 1964, No. 45, September 29, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500964085 -4110. Rohde, W.A.: Acidic constituents of burley volatiles. I. Isolation, characterization, and synthesis of compound SO15C; RDR, 1964, No. 46, October 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500964111 -4123. Rohde, W.A.: Acidic constituents of burley volatiles. II. Isolation and synthesis of SO17C; RDR, 1964, No. 48, October 6, see. www.rjrtdocs.com 500964140 -4155. Rohde, W.A.: Burley tobacco constituents. III. Acidic material of burley tobacco dust; RDM, 1966, No. 45, August 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500603871 -3874. Rohrbach, E.: Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Tabakrauchens [Contributions to knowledge of tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 78 (1937) 453–463. Roosens, N.H., R. Willem, Y. Li, I. Verbruggen, M. Biesemans, and M. Jacobs: Proline metabolism in the wild-type and in a salt-tolerant mutant of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia studied by 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance imagining; Plant Physiol. 121 (1999) 1281–1290. Rosa, N.: An automated method for analyzing starch in green and mature leaf lamina; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 58–61. Ross, J.H.: Infrared spectra for analysis of aldehyde and ketone 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones; Anal. Chem. 25 (1953) 1288–1303. Rostami, A.A., M.R. Hajaligol, P. Li, S. Rabiei, and M.S. Rostami: Formation and reduction of carbon monoxide in a burning cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 439–447. Rothwell, K. and J.K. Whitehead: A method for the isolation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from complex hydrocarbon mixtures; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1967) 784–786. Rothwell, K. and J.K. Whitehead: Complex formation, isolation and carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Nature 213 (1967) 797. Rothwell, K. and J.K. Whitehead: A method for the concentration of basic polycyclic heterocyclic compounds and the separation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from cigarette smoke condensate; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1969) 1628–1630. Rothwell, K. and J.K. Whitehead: Fractionation of whole smoke condensate; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 30, 1971, p. 17. Rouse, C.A.: Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons between the particulate and vapor phase of mainstream cigarette smoke; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 48, 2006, p. 46.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1394
11/24/08 2:39:57 PM
Bibliography
3341. Rouse, C.A., K.R. Carithers, and C.R. Taylor Jr: Analysis of alpha carbonyls in mainstream smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 81, 2003, pp. 69–70. 3342. Rouse, C.A., J.C. Cunningham, and C.R. Taylor Jr: Analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in mainstream smoke by supercritical fluid extraction/gas chromatography/chemiluminescence detection; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 50, 1999, pp. 47–48. 3343. Rouse, C.A., J.M. Wilkins, and C.R. Taylor Jr: Analysis of TSNAs in mainstream smoke and TSNAs and VNAs in sidestream smoke; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 61, 2004, p. 59. 3344. Rowland, R.L.: Isolation of constituents of flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1954, No. 9, August 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501662874 -2911. 3345. Rowland, R.L.: Isolation of neophytadiene from fluecured tobacco; RDR, 1956, No. 8, September 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500930123 -0140; Flue-cured tobacco. II. Neophytadiene; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79 (1957) 5007–5010. 3346. Rowland, R.L.: Isolation of sterols from flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1958, No. 1, January 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500932154 -2165. 3347. Rowland, R.L.: Isolation of solanachromene and A-tocopherol from flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1958, No. 3, February 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500932182 -2196; Identification of two phenol fractions isolated from flue-cured tobacco; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 15, 1958, p. 6; Flue-cured tobacco. III. Solanachromene and A-tocopherol; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1958) 6130–6133. 3348. Rowland, R.L.: Further studies on the constitution of the lipid fractions of flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1959, No. 4, March 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933116 -3125. 3349. Rowland, R.L.: Flue-cured tobacco. Summary report 1954–1959; RDR, 1960, No. 17, May 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500934764 -4809. 3350. Rowland, R.L.: Flue-cured tobacco. Summary report 1959–1961; RDR, 1961, No. 30, May 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936755 -6769. 3351. Rowland, R.L.: Characterization of M-II-b, an unsaturated glycol isolated from flue-cured tobacco, as 12-isopropyl-1,5,9-trimethyl-3,8,13-cyclotetradecatriene-1,5-diol; RDR, 1962, No. 12, May 1, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500938858 -8876. 3352. Rowland, R.L.: Characterization of M-II-e and Compound X. Macrocyclic diterpenes isolated from tobacco; RDR, 1963, No. 15, February 28, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500961289 -1315. 3353. Rowland, R.L.: Components of burley tobacco extracted by water; RDM, 1964, No. 3, March 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602203 -2204. 3354. Rowland, R.L. and D. Cabiness: Flue-cured tobacco volatile components, 1962; RDR, 1962, No. 16, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938913 -8935. 3355. Rowland, R.L. and D. Cabiness: Flue-cured tobacco. The K-I and K-II compounds; RDR, 1962, No. 23, July 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500939084 -9123. 3356. Rowland, R.L. and D. Cabiness: Flue-cured tobacco volatile components, 1963; RDR, 1963, No. 29, April 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961531 -1542.
1395
3357. Rowland, R.L. and J.A. Giles: Flue-cured tobacco. V. Polyisoprenoid compounds; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 29–32. 3358. Rowland, R.L. and P.H. Latimer: Isolation of solanesyl esters from flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1958, No. 12, June 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500932361 -2372; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 13, 1958, p. 5; Flue-cured tobacco. IV. Isolation of solanesyl esters; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 1–3. 3359. Rowland, R.L., P.H. Latimer, and J.A. Giles: Flue-cured tobacco. I. Isolation of solanesol, an unsaturated alcohol; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78 (1956) 4680–4685; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 86–90; Isolation of solanesol from flue-cured tobacco; RDR, 1961, No. 55, December 4, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500937645 -7659. 3360. Rowland, R.L. and D.L. Roberts: Macrocycylic diterpenes isolated from tobacco. A- and B-3,8,13-Duvatriene1,5-diols; J. Org. Chem. 28 (1963) 1165–1169. 3361. Rowland, R.L., A. Rodgman, J.N. Schumacher, D.L. Roberts, L.C. Cook, and W.E. Walker Jr: Macrocyclic diterpenes. Hydroxyethers from tobacco and tobacco smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 16, 1963, p. 13, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521189981 -9997; Macrocyclic diterpene hydroxyethers from tobacco and cigarette smoke; J. Org. Chem. 29 (1964) 16–21. 3362. Royal College of Physicians: Smoking and health; Pitman, London, England (1962). 3363. Royal College of Physicians: Smoking and health; Pitman, London, England (1971). 3364. The Royal College of Physicians (London): Smoking or health. The third report from the Royal College of Physicians of London; Pitman, London, England (1977). 3365. Rubin, H.: Synergistic mechanisms in carcinogenesis by polycyclic hydrocarbons and by tobacco smoke: A biohistorical perspective with updates; Carcinogenesis 22 (2001) 1903–1930. 3366. Rühl, C., J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. LXVI. Comparative assessment of volatile and tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in the smoke of selected cigarettes from the U.S.A., West Germany and France; J. Anal. Toxicol. 4 (1980) 255–259. 3366a. Runeckles, V.C.: The determination of rutin and chlorogenic acid in tobacco; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 25, 1960, p. 13. 3367. Runeckles, V.C.: Natural radioactivity in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Nature 191 (1961) 322–325. 3367a. Runeckles, V.C.: Tobacco polyphenols. II. On the biosynthesis of chlorogenic acid; Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 41 (1963) 2249–2258. 3368. Ruppert, T., G. Scherer, A.R. Tricker, and F.X. Adlkofer: Benzene exposure of nonsmokers from smoking and nonsmoking homes in Germany; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 27, 1995, pp. 32–33. 3369. Rush, K.L.: Determination of ammonia in tobacco smoke; RDR, 1970, No. 45, October 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501001115 -1149. 3369a. Rustemeier, K. and J.-J. Piadé: Determination of nicotine in mainstream amd sidestream cigarette smoke;
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1395
11/24/08 2:39:57 PM
1396
3370.
3370a.
3370b.
3370c.
3370d.
3371. 3372.
3373.
3374.
3375.
3375a.
3376.
3377.
3378.
3379.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Chapter 12 in: Analytical determination of nicotine and related compounds and their metabolites, edited by J.W. Gorrods and P. Jacob III, Elsevier, New York, NY (1999) 489–530. Rustemeier, K., R. Stabbert, H.J. Haussmann, E. Roemer, and E.L. Carrnines: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 2: Chemical composition of mainstream smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 93–104. Ryals, J.A., D.C. Alexander, J.J Beck, J.H. Duesing, R.M. Goodman, L.B. Friedrich, C. Harms, F. Meins Jr, A. Montoya, M.B. Moyer, J.-M. Neuhaus, G.B. Payne, and C. Sperisen: Chemically regulatable and anti-pathogenic DNA sequences and uses thereof; U.S. Patent No. 5,614,395 (March 3, 1997). Ryals, J. A., D. C. Alexander, R. M. Goodman, and E. R. Ward: Method of protecting plants from oomycete pathogens; U.S. Patent No. 5,856,154 (January 5, 1999). Ryals, J.A., L. B Friedrich, S.J. Uknes, and E.R. Ward: Chemically inducible promoter of a plant PR-1 gene; U.S. Patent No. 5,689,044 (November 18, 1997). Ryals, J.A., E.R. Ward, G.B. Payne, M.B. Moyer, and F. Meins Jr: DNA encoding plant chitinases; U.S. Patent No. 5,880,328 (September 3, 1999). Ryan, W.S. Jr: Neutral sugar analysis of tobacco cell wall fractions; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 105–111. Ryan, W.S. Jr, G.H. Bokelman, H.H. Sun, and T.R. Terrill: Influence of genetic and cultural factors on chemical and physical properties of tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 88–94. Rylander, R.: Relative role of aerosol and volatile constituents of cigarette smoke as agents toxic to the respiratory tract; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 221–229. Sabetay, S., L. Trabaud, and H.F. Emmanuel: [The presence of borneol in tobacco]; Compt. Rend. 213 (1941) 321–323; Chim. Ind. (Paris) 46 (1941) 429. Sadler, W.W., R.R. Chesson, and A.W. Schoenbaum: Automated procedure for determining the nicotine content of steam distillates; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 208–212. Sadowsky, D.A., A.G. Gilliam, and J. Cornfield: The statistical association between smoking and carcinoma of the lung; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 13 (1953) 1237–1258. Safaev, R., G.A. Belitskii, T.A. Lycheva, I.A. Khitrovo, S.Y. Fukhs, L.V. Krivosheeva, D. Hoffmann, K.D. Brunnemann, and M.V. Djordjevic: The effect of cigarette filter modification on the content of chemical carcinogens in cigarette smoke and genotoxicity of condensate; Eksp. Onkol. 14 (1992) 24–27. Safaev, R., D.G. Zaridze, G.A. Belitskii, M.V. Djordjevic, D. Hoffmann, K.D. Brunnemann, Y.A. Perezhogina, N.N. Sokolskaya, A. Goginasvili, and Y. Khesina: Carcinogenic substances in the tobacco and smoke of cigarettes: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, metals, pesticides; Eksp. Onkol. 14 (1992) 25–29. Safaev, R., D.G. Zaridze, D. Hoffmann, K.D. Brunnemann, and Y. Liu: Efficiency and assessment of new cigarette filters. Chemical analysis of some of the toxic and carcinogenic agents in the mainstream smoke; Eksp. Onkol. 17 (1995) 71–76. Sagredos, A.N. and W.R. Eckert: Methoden zur Bestimmung von Phytopharmaka in Tabak und
3380.
3381.
3382.
3383.
3384.
3385.
3386.
3387.
3388.
3389.
3390.
Tabakerzeugnissen. I. Zur Simultanbestimmung von wasserlöslichen Organophosphor-Pflanzenschutzmitteln [Methods for the determination of phytopharmaceuticals in tobacco and tobacco products. I. On the simultaneous determination of water-soluble organophosphoric pesticides]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 438–446. Sagredos, A.N. and W.R. Eckert: Methoden zur Bestimmung von Phytopharmaka in Tabak und Tabakerzeugnissen. II. Zur Simultanbestimmung von hexanlöslichen Organophosphor-Pflanzenschutzmitteln [Methods for the determination of phytopharmaceuticals in tobacco and tobacco products. II. On the simultaneous determination of hexane-soluble organophosphoric pesticides]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 447–454. Sagredos, A.N. and W.R. Eckert: Methoden zur Bestimmung von Phytopharmaka in Tabak und Tabakerzeugnissen. III. Eine schnelle Bestimmung von Fenamiphos und Fensulfothion [Methods for the determination of phytopharmaceuticals in tobacco and tobacco products. III. Rapid determination of Fenamiphos and Fensulfothion]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 107–110. Sagredos, A.N. and R. Moser: Methoden zur Bestimmung von Phytopkarmaka in Tabak und Tabakerzeugnissen. IV. Ein Bestimmungsverfahren für Vamidothion und seine Metaboliten [Methods to determine phytopharmaceuticals in tobacco and tobacco products. IV. A procedure to determine Vamidothion and its metabolites]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 111–115. Saint-Jalm, Y. Quantitative analysis of the hydroxyl fraction of cigarette smoke; Ann. Tab. (Sect. 1) 18 (1980–1981) 41–48. Saint-Jalm, Y., G. Duval, and N. Beaulieu: A complete analysis of organic acids in smoke by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry; CORESTA 1992 Symp., Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1992 Spec. Edition: Paper ST 6, 80. Saint-Jalm, Y., G. Duval, T. Conte, and I. Bonnichon: Mechanisms of transfer of ammonia in cigarette smoke from ammonium compounds in tobacco; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST9, p. 153. Saint-Jalm, Y. and P. Morée-Testa: Study of nitrogencontaining compounds in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; J. Chromatog. 198 (1980) 188–192. Saint-Jalm, Y., P. Morée-Testa, and A. Testa: The volatile fraction of cigarette smoke condensate: Analysis by liquid chromatography and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Analysis 11 (1985) 12–18. Saito, H., H. Komatsu, Y. Ishiwata, K. Koga, and S. Fujii: Heat treatment and TSNAs formation in burley tobacco; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 38, 2003, pp. 41–42. Saito, Y., H. Takizawa, S. Konishi, D. Yoshida, and S. Mizusaki: Identification of cembratriene-4,6-diol as an antitumor-promoting agent from cigarette smoke condensate; Carcinogenesis 6 (1985) 1189–1194. Sakagami, H.: Studies on the components of licorice root used for tobacco flavouring. III. The behaviour on smoking of glycyrrhizic acid and glycyrrhetininc acid added to tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 47 (1973) 623–626.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1396
11/24/08 2:39:57 PM
Bibliography
3391. Sakaguchi, S. and Y. Kobashi: Sterols in cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 103 (1961) 15–18. 3392. Sakaki T, K. Fukuhara, K. Niino, H. Sakuma, and S. Sugawara: Studies on tobacco aroma. IV. Changes in the composition of headspace volatiles of flue-cured tobacco by aging; Agr. Biol. Chem. 49 (1985) 1785–1791. 3393. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, S. Ishiguro, N. Shimojima, and S. Sugawara: Organic acid composition of cellulose cigarette smoke condensate; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 2021–2025. 3394. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, S. Munakata, T. Ohsumi, and S. Sugawara: The distribution of cigarette smoke components between mainstream and sidestream smoke. I. Acidic components; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 63–71. 3395. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, S. Sato, and S. Sugawara: Fractionation and phenol composition of cellulose cigarette smoke condensate; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 2013–2020. 3396. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, N. Shimojima, and S. Sugawara: Gas chromatographic analysis of the p-nitrophenylhydrazones of low boiling carbonyl compounds in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 158–160. 3397. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, K. Yamaguchi, T. Matsuki, and S. Sugawara: Sidestream (SS)/mainstream (MS) distribution ratios of cigarette smoke components. III. Medium and high boiling components; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 41, 1983, p. 23; Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, K. Yamaguchi, and S. Sugawara: The distribution of cigarette smoke components between mainstream and sidestream smoke. III. Middle and high boiling components; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 251–258. 3398. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, K. Yamaguchi, T. Matsuki, and S. Sugawara: The distribution of cigarette smoke components between mainstream and sidestream smoke. II. Bases; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 199–209. 3399. Sakuma, H., M. Kusama, K. Yamaguchi, and S. Sugawara: The distribution of cigarette smoke condensate treated with nitrate; Toxicol. Lett. 50 (1984) 289–298 3400. Sakuma, H., S. Matsushima, S. Munakata, and S. Sugawara: Pyrolysis of chlorogenic acid and rutin; Agr. Biol. Chem. 46 (1982) 1311–1317. 3401. Sakuma, H., S. Munakata, and S. Sugawara: Volatile products of cellulose pyrolysis; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 443–451. 3402. Sakuma, H., T. Oksumi, and S. Sugawara: Particulate phase of cellulose cigarette smoke; Agr. Biol. Chem. 44 (1980) 555–561. 3402a. Sakuma, H., T. Oksumi, and S. Sugawara: Ether-soluble neutral portion of cellulose cigarette smoke condensate; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 2619–2621. 3403. Sakuma, H., N. Shimojima, and S. Sugawara: Method for the rapid determination of formic and acetic acid in cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 199 (1977) 107–109. 3404. Sakuma, H., N. Shimojima, and S. Sugawara: Carbonyl compound composition of cellulose cigarette smoke condensate; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 359–363. 3405. Sakuma, H. and S. Sugawara: Composition of the watersoluble portion of cellulose cigarette smoke condensate; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 1585–1589.
1397
3405a. Salaman, M.H.: Cocarcinogenesis; Brit. Med. Bull. 14 (2) (1958) 116–120. 3405b. Salaman, M.H. and O.M. Glendenning: Tumour promotion in mouse skin by sclerosing agents; Brit. J. Cancer 11 (1957) 434–444. 3406. Salles, L.D.: La fraction hydrosoluble du condensat de fumée de cigarette. Identification des principaux constituents [The water-soluble fraction of cigarette smoke condensate. Identification of the principal constituents]; SEITA 1976(14) 119–124. 3407. Sampson, C., E.L. Wynder, and D. Hoffmann: Perforated filter-tip cigarettes: Effect on tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide intake (Letter); J. Am. Med. Assoc. 241 (1979) 295. 3408. Samuels, L.D., V.R. Hunt, J.B. Little, and E.P. Radford Jr: Gonadal exposure to polonium-210 in man and mouse; Am. Genetics Soc. Mtg., Boulder Dam, CO, Genetics 50 (1964) 282–283. 3409. Sanders, E.B., A.I. Goldsmith, and J.I. Seeman: A model that distinguishes the pyrolysis of D-glucose, D-fructose and sucrose from that of cellulose. Application to the understanding of cigarette smoke formation; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 66 (2002) 29–50. 3410. Sanders, N.C., C.W. Miller, F.W. Best, A.L. Angel, and M.P. Newell: Comparative smoke studies. VII. Mainstream vs. sidestream “Winston monitor”; RDR, 1978, No. 6, December 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501005524 -5550. 3411. Sarabia, J. and J.M. González: An interesting compound of the sidestream smoke of cigarettes: Hexamethylenetetramine; CORESTA 1992 Symp., Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1992 Spec. Edition: Paper ST16, 90. 3412. Saruta, N.: Über die quantitative Bestimmung der Kohlenoxydmenge im Tabakrauch [On the quantitative determination of the amount of carbon oxides in tobacco smoke]; Fukuoka Acta Med. 30 (1937) 117– 118; Fukuoka Acta Med. 31 (1938) 180. 3413. Sasaki, T.: The chemical components of tobacco smoke. Diacetyl content of cigarette smoke; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 27 (1953) 134–136. 3414. Sasaki, T.A. and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of dibenz[a,j]acridine in particulate-phase cigarette smoke; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 32, 1999. p. 37; Determination of dibenz[a,j]acridine in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2000) 25–31. 3415. Sasmoco, S.A.: Improvements in or relating to a process for treating tobacco and tobacco obtained by said process; British Patent No. 885,249 (Cl. 130) (December 30, 1961). 3415a. Sato, S., Y. Seino, T. Yahagi, M. Nagao, T. Matsushima, and T. Sugimura: Mutagenicity of smoke condensates from cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco; Cancer Lett. 3 (1977) 1–8. 3416. Satterlee, H.S.: The problem of arsenic in American cigarettes; New Engl. J. Med. 254 (1956) 1149–1154. 3417. Satterlee, H.S.: The arsenic-poisoning epidemic of 1900: Its relation to lung cancer in 1960: An exercise in retrospective epidemiology; New Eng. J. Med. 263 (1960) 676–684. 3417a. Sauer, N. and R. Stadler: A sink specific H+/monosaccharide cotransporter from Nicotiana tabacum: Cloning
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1397
11/24/08 2:39:57 PM
1398
3418.
3419.
3419a.
3419b.
3419c.
3420.
3421.
3422.
3423.
3424.
3425.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
and heterologous expression in baker’s yeast; The Plant Journal 4 (1993) 601–610. Sawada, H., J. Kawamoto, and M. Kotani: Concentration of semi-volatile components in cigarette smoke by puff number; CORESTA 1982 Symp., Winston-Salem, NC, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper S10, 20–21. Sawicki, E., W.C. Elbert, T.R. Hauser, F.T. Fox, and T.W. Stanley: Benzo[a]pyrene content in the air of American communities; Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. 21 (1960) 443–451. Sawicki, E., S.P. McPherson, T.M. Stanley, J.E. Meeker, and W.C. Elbert: Quantitative composition of the urban atmosphere in terms of polynuclear aza heterocyclic compounds and aliphatic and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; Int. J. Air Water Pollut. 9 (1965) 515–524. Sawicki, E., J.E. Meeker, and M.J. Morgan: Polynuclear aza compounds in automobile exhaust; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 11 (1975) 773–775. Sawicki, E., T.W. Stanley, and W.C. Elbert: Characterization of polynuclear aza heterocyclic hydrocarbons separated by column and thin-layer chromatography from air pollution source particulates; J. Chromatog. 18 (1965) 512–519. Sawyer, C.M.: The reduction of nicotine content of K-4 burley strips by ammonia-steam treatment and the effect of treated burley on Camel cigarettes, Test Nos. 1180-A, 1180-B, and 1180-C; RDM. 1959, No. 109, November 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500611662 -1668. Scassellati-Sforzolini, G. and A. Mariani: Benzopirene e di altri idrocarburi policiclici nel fumo delle sigarette “Nationale Esportazione” [Benzopyrene and other polycyclic hydrocarbons in the smoke of “Nationale Esportazione”]; Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 37 (1961) 766–768. Scassellati-Sforzolini, G. and A. Mariani: Ricerca del 3:4-benzopirene e di altri idrocarburi policiclici nel fumo di sigarette Italiane: Contributo allo studio dell’azione cancerigene del fumo di tobacco [Research on 3:4benzopyrene and other polycyclic hydrocarbons in the smoke of Italian cigarettes: Contribution to the study of the carcinogenic action of tobacco smoke]; Ricerca Sci. Rend. 1(2) (1961) 98–117. Scassellati-Sforzolini, G. and G. Saldi: Ulteriori ricerche sugli idrocarburi policiclici del fumeso di sigarette. (Confronto tra il Fumo aspirato e quello raccolto nell’aria ambiente) [Further research on the polycyclic hydrocarbon content of the smoke of cigarettes. (Comparison between the aspirated smoke from cigarettes and that recovered from the ambient air)]; Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 37 (1961) 769–771. Scassellati-Sforzolini, G. and G. Salucci: Prime ricerche sulla presenza di idrocarburi cancerigeni nel fumo delle sigarette Italiane [Initial research on the presence of carcinogenic hydrocarbons in the smoke of Italian cigarettes]; Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 34 (1958) 424–426. Scassellati-Sforzolini, G. and A. Savino: Valutazione di un indice rapido di contaminazione ambientale da fumo di zigaretta in relazione alle composizione della fase del fumo [Evaluation of a rapid index of ambient contamination by cigarette smoke in relation to the composition of gas phase of smoke]; Riv. Ital. Ig. 28 (1968) 43–55.
3426. Schaarschmidt, A., H. Hoffmeier, and P. Nowak: Applicability of absorption agents for removing poisons from tobacco smoke; Chem. Zeit. 56 (1932) 911–913. 3427. Schaller, K.H., G. Triebig, and B. Beyer: Determination of formaldehyde in tobacco smoke: Investigations under experimental and field conditions; Zbl. Hyg. Umweltmed. 189 (1989) 103–110. 3427a. Schardl, C.L. and C.I. Kado: A functional map of the nopaline catabolism genes on the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58; Biomed. Life Sci. 191 (1983) 10–16 3428. Scheijen, M.A. and J.J. Boon: Investigations on the lignin polymer system in enzyme-digested lamina and midrib tobacco residues using analytical pyrolysis techniques; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 51, 1990, p. 37. 3429. Scheijen, M.A., J.J. Boon, W. Hass, and V. Heemann: Investigations on tobacco polymer fractions and pectins with analytical pyrolysis techniques; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 20, 1988, p. 26. 3429a. Scheijen, M.A., J.J. Boon, W. Hass, and V. Heemann: Characterization of tobacco lignin preparations by Curie-point pyrolysis-mass spectrometry and Curiepoint pyrolysis-high resolution gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 15 (1989) 97–120. 3430. Scheijen, M.A., B. Brandt-de Boer, J.J. Boon, W. Hass, and V. Heemann: Evaluation of tobacco fractionation procedure using pyrolysis mass spectrometry combined with multivariate analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 261–282. 3431. Schepartz, A.I.: The chemistry of cigar smoke. II. Some components of the neutral fraction; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 12–16. 3432. Schepartz, A.I.: Paper chromatography of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones. Extension of the Huelin method; J. Chromatog. 6 (1961) 182–185. 3433. Schepartz, A.I.: Method for the determination of catalase activity in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 52–54. 3434. Schepartz, A.I. and D.G. Bailey: Enzymatic activity in harvested cigar-filler tobacco: Peroxidase and catalase; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 105–107. 3434a. Schepartz, A.I. and D.G. Bailey: Detection of protein in highly pigmented cured tobacco; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 584–592; J. Anal. Toxicol. 1 (1977) 104–115. 3435. Schepartz, A.I., J.J. Ellington, and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Destruction of precursors of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco by treatment with ozone; Tob. Sci. 24 (1980) 56–58. 3436. Schepartz, A.I. and P.E. McDowell: The identification of cigar smoke carbonyls by hydrazone exchange chromatography; 13th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 13, Paper No. 23, 1959, p. 12; Identification of carbonyls in cigar smoke by hydrazone exchange gas chromatography. USDA Res. Serv., Eastern Utilization Res. and Dev. Div., Philadelphia, PA, ARS 73–74 (July, 1961) pp. 1–8.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1398
11/24/08 2:39:57 PM
1399
Bibliography
3437. Schepartz, A.I., A.C. Mottola, W.S. Schlotzhauer, D.W. DeJong, and J.J. Lam: Effect of ozone treatment of tobacco on leaf lipids and smoke PAH: A pilot-plant trial; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 29, 1980, p. 15; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 120–122. 3438. Schepartz, A.I. and C.L. Ogg: Chemical analysis of cigar smoke: The neutral fraction; 12th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 12, Paper No. 11, 1958, pp. 4–5. 3439. Schepers, G., E. Roemer, T. Clark, and E. Kaussmann: Recovery of Imidachloprid and its metabolites in tobacco smoke of cigarettes made from Imidachloprid-treated tobacco; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 65, 1997, p. 65. 3440. Scherbak, M.P., R.L. Rice, and J.E. de Souza: An absolute method for the determination of 3,4-benzpyrene in cigarette smoke; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 20, 1963, pp. 15–16. 3441. Scherbak MP and T.A. Smith: A colorimetric method for the determination of oxides of nitrogen in cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 6, 1969, p. 5; A colorimetric method for the determination of total oxides of nitrogen in cigarette smoke; Analyst 95 (1970) 964–968. 3441a. Scherer, G.: Application of biomarkers for the evaluation of potential reduced-exposure products (PREPS); Recent Adv. Tob. Res. 32 (2006) 85–122. 3442. Scherer, G. and F. Adlkofer: Radioactivity in tobacco and tobacco smoke; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: ST03, 103. 3443. Schievelbein, H., A.K. Armitage, H. McKennis Jr, E. Boyland, J.W. Gorrod, E. Leete, H. van Vunakis, D.M. Turner, L. Neelakantan, C. Feyerabend, and E.C. Hornung: Nicotine workshop; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 286–292. 3444. Schievelbein, H. and E. Werle: Nikotin, Rauchen, und Organismus [Nicotine, smoking and organism]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 199–274. 3445. Schlossmann, H.: The nicotine content in the smoke of cigarettes containing low-nicotine, nicotine-detoxified, and nicotine-free tobaccos; Klin. Wchnschr. 12 (1933) 1255–1258. 3446. Schlossmann, H. and M. Schlesinger: Wird der Nikotingehalt des Zigarrenrauches durch Bonicot vermindert? [Is the nicotine content of cigar smoke increased by Bonicot?] Klin. Wchnschr. 11 (1932) 371–372. 3447. Schlotzhauer, W.S.: Fatty acids and phenols from pyrolysis of cocoa powder, a tobacco product flavorant; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 1–2. 3448. Schlotzhauer, W.S.: Liquid chromatographic separation of chlorophyll products in tobacco leaf; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 44–45. 3449. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: The rapid pyrolytic characterization of tobacco leaf carbohydrate material; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 74–80. 3450. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Arrendale, R.M. Martin, and O.T. Chortyk: Separation and identification of pyrolysis products by glass capillary gas chromatographymass spectrometry; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research
3451.
3452.
3453.
3454.
3455.
3456.
3457.
3458.
3459.
3460.
3461.
3462.
Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 38, 1983, p. 21. Schlotzhauer, W.S., D.G. Bailey, A.I. Schepartz, and I. Schmeltz: Products from pyrolysis of cigar tobaccos obtained at different stages of processing; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 19, 1970, p. 12; Comparison of pyrolyzates from fermented and unfermented cigar filler tobacco; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 93–96. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and O.T. Chortyk: Comparison of pyrolytic products from flue-cured tobacco leaf and a reconstituted tobacco sheet; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 30, 1974, p. 22; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 84–88. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and O.T. Chortyk: Pyrolytic studies on the origin of phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 6–10. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and O.T. Chortyk: Effects of varied smoking machine parameters on deliveries of total particulate matter and selected smoke constituents from an ultra low-tar cigarette; J. Anal. Toxicol. 7 (1983) 92–95. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and O.T. Chortyk: Recent advances in studies on the pyrosynthesis of cigarette smoke constituents; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 12 (1987) 193–222. Schlotzhauer, W.S., O.T. Chortyk, H.C. Higman, and I. Schmeltz: Pyrolytic studies of fractions sequentially extracted from tobacco; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 153–155. Schlotzhauer, W.S., O.T. Chortyk, and R.F. Severson: Application of a pyrolytic method for the rapid evaluation of smoke composition changes resulting from variations in growing, harvesting, curing, and processing of tobacco leaf; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 54, 1978, p. 29; Rapid pyrolytic method for evaluating effects of tobacco variety, growing, harvesting, and post-harvest treatment on smoke composition; Tob. Sci. 23 (1979) 103–106. Schlotzhauer, W.S., E.B. Higman, and I. Schmeltz: Products from pyrolysis of tobacco extracts; in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972) 69. Schlotzhauer, W.S., M.J. Kasperbauer, and R.F. Severson: Plant population density effects on the alkaloids, solanesol and chlorogenic acid content of burley tobacco; Tob. Sci. 33 (1989) 47–51. Schlotzhauer, W.S., M.J. Kasperbauer, R.F. Severson, and R.M. Martin: Plant population density effects on the chemical composition of burley tobacco and smoke; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 43, 1987, p. 34. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.M. Martin, O.T. Chortyk, and J.J. Lam Jr: Effects of differing ozone treatments on the chemical composition of bright tobacco leaf; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 6, 1986, p. 4; Schlotzhauer, W.S., J.J. Lam Jr, and O.T. Chortyk: Changes in the chemical composition of NC2326 tobacco through ozone treatment of intact leaves; Tob. Sci. 31 (1987) 57–60. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.M. Martin, R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, and R.E. Williamson: Pyrolytic determination of the effect of leaf composition on levels of catechol and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1399
11/24/08 2:39:58 PM
1400
3463.
3464.
3465.
3466.
3467.
3468.
3469.
3470.
3471.
3472.
3473.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
other smoke phenols; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 9, 1980, p. 5; Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.M. Martin, M.E. Snook, and R.E. Williamson: Pyrolytic studies on the contribution of tobacco leaf constituents to the formation of smoke catechols; J. Agr. Food Chem. 30 (1982) 372–374. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and I. Schmeltz: Non-alkaloidal bases from pyrolysis of tobacco leaf pigment at the approximate burn temperature of a cigarette; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 89–90. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and I. Schmeltz: 3,5-Xylenol and other products from pyrolysis of sodium acetate; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 23, 1968, p. 18. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and I. Schmeltz: Pyrogenesis of aromatic hydrocarbons present in cigarette smoke. I. Role of the hexane soluble fraction of tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 176–181. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and I. Schmeltz: Pyrogenesis of aromatic hydrocarbons present in cigarette smoke. II. Pyrolysis products of some representative constituents of the hexane soluble fraction of tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 5–8. Schlotzhauer, W.S. and I. Schmeltz: Role of the hexane soluble fraction of tobacco in the formation of aromatic hydrocarbons present in tobacco smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 28, 1969, p. 20. Schlotzhauer, W.S., I. Schmeltz, and L.C. Donio: Pyrolytic formation of phenols from high molecular weight tobacco leaf constituents; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 28, 1966, pp. 35–37; Schlotzhauer, W.S., I. Schmeltz, and L.C. Hickey: Pyrolytic formation of phenols from some high molecular weight tobacco leaf constituents and non-tobacco materials; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 31–34. Schlotzhauer, W.S., I. Schmeltz, and S.F. Osman: Evidence for the origin of monoalkenes in cigarette smoke; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1970) 1377–1378. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, R.F. Arrendale, and H.C. Higman: Pyrolytic formation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from petroleum ether extractable constituents of flue-cured tobacco leaf; J. Agr. Food Chem. 24 (1976) 992–997. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, P.D. Cole, and H.G. Cutler: Chemical, biological, and thermal properties of acyl and hydroxy acylnornicotines from Nicotiana species; 44th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 44, Paper No. 37, 1990, p. 30. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Severson, O.T. Chortyk, and M.E. Snook: Pyrolytic precursors of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the petroleum ether extract of tobacco; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 43, 1975, p. 30. Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Severson, R.M. Martin, and K.L. McDuffie: The contribution of sucrose esters to tobacco smoke composition; 38th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 38, Paper No. 31, 1984, p. 17; Schlotzhauer, W.S., R.F. Severson, and R.M. Martin: The contribution of
3474.
3475.
3476.
3477.
3478. 3479.
3480.
3481.
3482.
3483.
3484.
3485.
3486.
sucrose esters to tobacco smoke composition; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 229–238. Schlotzhauer, W.S., D.B. Walters, M.E. Snook, and H.C. Higman: The separation and identification of the constituents of a catechol-containing subfraction of cigarette smoke condensate; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 40, 1977, p. 21; Characterization of catechols, resorcinols, and hydroquinones in an acid fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 1277–1281. Schmalfuss, H.: Diacetyl – Ein Aromabestandteil des Tabakrauches [Diacetyl: A constituent contributing to the aroma of tobacco smoke]; Tabak (Berlin) 3 (1939) 19-21; Diacetyl: An aroma component of tobacco smoke; Rev. Internat. Tabaks 25 (1950) 89, see Chem. Abstr. 45 (1951) 1303e. Schmeltz, I.: Cigarette smoke: Formation of components and modification of composition by use of additives; Proc. 5th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Hamburg FRG (1970) 85–94. Schmeltz, I.: Nicotine and other tobacco alkaloids; in: Naturally occurring insecticides, edited by M. Jacobson and D.G. Crosby, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY (1971) pp. 99–136. Schmeltz, I. (Editor): The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke; Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972). Schmeltz, I.: Chapter in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972) pp. 77–97. Schmeltz, I., S. Abidi, and D. Hoffmann: Tumorigenic agents in unburned processed tobacco: N-Nitrosodiethanolamine and 1,1-dimethylhydrazine; Cancer Lett. 2 (1977) 125–131. Schmeltz, I., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Trace analysis in agricultural products. Methods for hydrazines, carbamates, N-nitrosodiethanolamine and other compounds; in: Trace organic analysis. A new frontier in analytical chemistry, edited by H.S. Hertz and S.N. Chesler, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD (1979) 297–309. Schmeltz, I., K.D. Brunnemann, D. Hoffmann, and A. Cornell: On the chemistry of cigar smoke: Comparisons between experimental little and large cigars; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 41, 1975, p. 29; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 367–377. Schmeltz, I., K.G. Ching, and D. Hoffmann: Formation and determination of ethyl carbamate in tobacco and tobacco smoke; J. Anal. Toxicol. 2 (1978) 265–268. Schmeltz, I., A. de Paolis, and D. Hoffmann: Quantitative analysis of major phytosterols in tobacco and smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 43, 1974, p. 29; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXXI. Phytosterols in tobacco: Quantitative analysis and fate in tobacco combustion; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 211–218. Schmeltz, I., J. Dooley, R.L. Stedman, and W.J. Chamberlain: Composition studies on tobacco. XXII. The nitromethane-soluble neutral fraction of cigaret smoke; Phytochemistry 6 (1967) 33–38. Schmeltz, I., L.C. Hickey, and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Phenols from pyrolysis of leaf acids; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 52–53.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1400
11/24/08 2:39:58 PM
Bibliography
3487. Schmeltz, I., E.B. Higman, W.S. Schlotzhauer, and A.R. Bruzel: Characteristic products from pyrolysis of nitrogen-containing compounds found in tobacco and elsewhere; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 18, 1970, p. 11. 3488. Schmeltz, I., H.C. Higman, and R.L. Stedman: Phenols of cigar smoke; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 17, 1962, pp. 11–12. 3489. Schmeltz, I. and D. Hoffmann: Formation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from combustion of organic matter; in: Carcinogenesis. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons: Chemistry, metabolism, and carcinogenesis, edited by R.I. Freudenthal and P.I. Jones, Raven Press, New York, NY (1973) 225–239. 3490. Schmeltz, I. and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXXVIII. The physicochemical nature of cigarette smoke; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, 1975, Vol. 1, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 13–34. 3491. Schmeltz, I. and D. Hoffmann: Nitrogen-containing compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Chem. Rev. 77 (1977) 295–311. 3492. Schmeltz, I., J. Tosk, and D. Hoffmann: Naphthalenes in tobacco smoke: Analysis and formation; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 22, 1975, p. 19; Schmeltz, I., J. Tosk, and D. Hoffmann: Formation and determination of naphthalenes in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 645–650. 3493. Schmeltz, I., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: Toxic and tumorigenic agents in tobacco smoke: Analytical methods and modes of origin; in: Proc. 8th Ann. Conf. Trace Substances in Environmental Hlth., edited by D.D. Hemphill, Columbia, MO (1974) 281–295. 3494. Schmeltz, I., D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: The influence of tobacco smoke on indoor atmospheres. I. An overview; Prev. Med. 4 (1975) 66–82. 3495. Schmeltz, I. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Volatile acids of cigar smoke; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 92–94. 3496. Schmeltz, I. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Nonvolatile acids of cigar smoke; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 13, 1961, p. 7; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 90–91. 3497. Schmeltz, I. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: Benzo[a]pyrene, phenols, and other products from pyrolysis of the cigarette additive, (d,l)-menthol; Nature 219 (1968) 370–371. 3498. Schmeltz, I. and W.S. Schlotzhauer: 3,5-Dimethylphenol and other products from pyrolysis of sodium acetate; Chem. Comm. (1969) 681–682. 3499. Schmeltz, I., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and E.B. Higman: Characteristic products from pyrolysis of nitrogenous organic substances; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 134–138. 3500. Schmeltz, I., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and T.C. Jones: Pyrolysis (800°C) of benzene, toluene and phenol in nitrogen and in air; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 14, 1967, p. 9. 3501. Schmeltz, I. and R.L. Stedman: Pyridin-3-ol in cigar smoke; Chem. Ind. (1962) 1244–1245.
1401
3502. Schmeltz, I., R.L. Stedman, J.S. Ard, and W.J. Chamberlain: Myristicin in cigarette smoke; Science 151 (1966) 96–97. 3503. Schmeltz, I., R.L. Stedman, and W.J. Chamberlain: Improved method for the determination of benzo[a] pyrene in cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chem. 36 (1964) 2499–2500. 3504. Schmeltz, I., R.L. Stedman, and W.J. Chamberlain: Benzyl benzoate in cigarette smoke; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 29, 1965, pp. 43–45. 3505. Schmeltz, I., R.L. Stedman, W.J. Chamberlain, and D. Burdick: Composition studies on tobacco. XX. Bases of cigarette smoke; J. Sci. Food Agr. 15 (1964) 774–781. 3506. Schmeltz, I., R.L. Stedman, W.J. Chamberlain, and C.D. Stills: Benzyl esters, indoles and carbazoles in cigarette smoke; Chem. Ind. (1965) 2009–2010. 3507. Schmeltz, I., R.L. Stedman, and R.L. Miller: Steamvolatile acids from various tobaccos; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 13, 1963, pp. 11–12; Composition studies on tobacco. XVI. Steam volatile acids; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 46 (1963) 779–784. 3508. Schmeltz, I., C.D. Stills, W.J. Chamberlain, and R.L. Stedman: Analysis of cigarette smoke fractions by combined gas chromatography-infrared spectrophotometry; Anal. Chem. 37 (1965) 1614–1616. 3509. Schmeltz, I., J. Tosk, J. Hilfrich, N. Hirota, and D. Hoffmann: Bioassays of naphthalene and alkylnaphthalenes for cocarcinogenic activity. Relation to tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Vol. 3, edited by P.W. Jones and R.I. Freudenthal, Raven Press, New York, NY (1978) 47–60. 3509a. Schmeltz, I., J. Tosk, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XLVI. Formation and determination of naphthalenes in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 645–650. 3510. Schmeltz, I., J. Tosk, G. Jacobs and D. Hoffmann: The redox potential and quinone content of cigarette smoke; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 44, 1976, p. 31; Redox potential and quinone content of cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 49 (1977) 1924–1929. 3511. Schmeltz, I., A. Wenger, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: Use of radioactive tobacco isolates for studying the formation of selected smoke components; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 35, 1976, p. 26; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. 53. Use of radioactive tobacco isolates for studying the formation of smoke components; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 234–239. 3512. Schmeltz, I., A. Wenger, D. Hoffmann, and T.C. Tso: Use of radioactive tracers to determine cigarette smoke components that arise from nicotine during combustion; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 17, 1977, p. 9; Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. 63. On the fate of nicotine during pyrolysis and in a burning cigarette; J. Agr. Food Chem. 27 (1979) 602–608. 3513. Schmid, E.: Versuche zur Verminderung des Ruckstandsgehaltes von Dithiocarbamates an Tabak [Study of the lowering of the residual content of dithiocarbamates in tobacco]; Deut. Tabakrau 50(5) (1970) 45–48.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1401
11/24/08 2:39:58 PM
1402
3514. Schmid, E.R., G. Allmaier, G. Bachlechner, K. Varmuza, and H. Klus: Determination of oxygen and/or sulfur containing polycyclic aromatic compounds in cigarette smoke condensate; 8th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Vienna, Austria, 1984, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1984: Paper S16, 56; Schmid, E.R., G. Bachlechner, K. Varmuza, and H. Klus: Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic sulfur and oxygen heterocycles in cigarette smoke condensate; Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 322 (1985) 213–219. 3515. Schmid, K.: Report on the scientific research carried out at the Tobacco Institute of Forchheim, West Germany. III. Biochemistry and chemistry; Proc. 1st Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Paris, France, 1954: (1955) 106–111. 3516. Schmid, K.: Chemisch-Physikalische Beschaffenheit des Tabakrauches [The chemical-physical nature of tobacco smoke]; Fortschr. Biol. Aerosol-Forsch. 1957/1961 (1963) 160–168. 3517. Schmidt, F.: Der Nikotingehalt von Tabak und Tabakrauch [The nicotine content of tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Thesis, Würzburg University (1904) pp. 1–46. 3518. Schmidt, J.A.: Improvement of the chemical composition of tobacco from the viewpoint of agricultural and chemical analysis of tobacco and smoke; Deut. Tabakrau 58 (1978) 1–3. 3519. Schmidt, J.A., E.D. Fischbach, and F. Burkhart: Cadmium Untersuchungen im Bereich von Umwelt-, Boden und Sorteneinflüssen bei Tabak sowie der Cadmium Übergang in den Zigarettenrauch [Cadmium investigations in the area of the effect of environment, soil and type on tobacco as well as cadmium emission in cigarette smoke]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 180 (1985) 306–311. 3519a. Schmidt, O.K. and W.H. Hoge: Tobacco sheet reinforced with hardwood pulp; U.S. Patent No. 4,306,578 (December 22, 1981). 3519b. Schmidt, R. and E. Hecker: Biological assays for irritant, tumor-initiating and tumor-promoting activities. II. Standardized initiation/promotion protocol and semiquantitative estimation of promoting (or initiating) potencies in skin of NMRI mice; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 115 (1989) 516–524. 3519c. Schmitter, J.M., H. Colin, J.L. Excoffier, P. Arpino, and G. Guiochon: Identification of triaromatic nitrogen bases in crude oils; Anal. Chem. 54 (1982) 769. 3520. Schoental, R.: Carcinogenic activity of 3,4,9,10-dibenzpyrene; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 216–219. 3521. Schöller, R.: Nikotingehalt des Rauches feuchter und trockener Zigarren [Nicotine content of smoke of moist and dry cigars]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1927/1928(2) 2–4. 3522. Schöller, R.: Der Gehalt des Tabakrauches an Kohlenoxid [The carbon monoxide content of tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1929(3) 1–9. 3523. Schöller, R.: 3-Pyridyläthylketon im Tabakrauch [3-Pyridyl ethyl ketone in tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1935(3) 7. 3524. Schöller, R.: Über den Gehalt des gasförmigen und des fest-flüssigen Anteils des Tabakrauches an Cyanwasserstoff [On the content of hydrogen cyanide in the gas and particulate phases of tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1938(1) 7–10. 3525. Schöller, R.: Schwefelwasserstoff und Rhodanwasserstoff in den gasförmigen und fest-flüssigen Anteilen des Tabakrauches [Hydrogen sulfide and thiocyanic acid
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3526.
3527.
3528.
3528a.
3529.
3530.
3531. 3532.
3533.
3534.
3535.
3536.
3537.
3538.
3539.
3540.
3541.
in the gas and particulate phases of tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1938(2) 1–4. Schöller, R. and E. Molinari: Beitrag zur Qualitätsbestimmung von Tabaken durch chemisch-physikalische Untersuchungen. Teil II [Contribution to the determination of tobacco quality through physicochemical research. Part II]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1937(2) 1–5. Schonherr, H.H., J. Klimisch, and H.P. Harke: Aging of cigarette smoke condensate. Quantitative investigation of artifact formation by gas and particulate phase reaction; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 18–23. Schonhofer, F. and H.T. Schreus: Unterzuchung zur Tabakrauch [Investigation of tobacco smoke]; Arzneimittelforschung 4 (1954) 75–79. Schreiber, K.: Identification and characterization of an endogenous cytometallophore of general distribution in plants; Pure Appl. Chem. 58 (1986) 745–752. Schrek, R., L.A. Baker, G.P. Ballard, and S. Dolgoff: Tobacco smoking as an etiologic factor in disease; Cancer Res. 10 (1950) 49–58. Schüller, D., C.J. Drews, and H.P. Harke: Analytische Untersuchungen an Gasphasenkondensat [Analytical examination of the gas phase of cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 84–88. Schultz, F.J. and A.W. Spears: Determination of moisture in total particulate matter; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 75–76. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. Third Progress Report on the isolation and identification of some of its constituents; RDR, 1957, No. 2, January 30, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500931176 -1200. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco - Fourth Progress Report - Isolation and identification of sclareolide; RDR, 1957, No. 9, June 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500931302 -1322. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. Isolation and identification of sclaral; RDR, 1959, No. 10, May 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933308 -3336. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. Isolation, characterization, and synthesis of 6-acetyl-2,3,4-tris-d-3-methylvalerylB-D-glucopyranoside; RDR, 1960, No. 16, May 12, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500934742 -4763; The isolation of 6-O-acetyl2,3,4-O-tris-[(+)-3-methylvaleryl]-B-D-glucopyranose from tobacco; Carbohydrate Res. 13 (1970) 1–8. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish sand. Progress report on the isolation of some of its constituents; RDR, 1960, No. 40, December 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500935090 -5118. Schumacher, J.N.: Flavoring acids in Turkish tobacco; RDR, 1955, No. 7, April 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501663231 -3249. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. Isolation and characterization of dehydroambreinolide and the isolation of compounds XVI and XVII; RDR, 1961, No. 12, March 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936127 -6143. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. The characterization of the “coconut oil” fraction. Identification and synthesis of mariolide (Compound XIII); RDR, 1961, No. 25, May 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936549 -6572. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. The molecular distillation of Turkish tobacco extract. The isolation of two tobacco flavorant precursors (sclareol oxide and Compound XXIII); RDR, 1962, No. 3, January 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938648 -8668. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. The characterization of bovolide (Compound XXXI); RDR, 1962, No. 28, July 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500939479 -9495.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1402
11/24/08 2:39:58 PM
Bibliography
3542. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. The isolation of acid carriers from Turkish tobaccos; RDR, 1963, No. 48, July 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500961963 -1975. 3543. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. The investigation of the steam condensate; RDR, 1964, No. 42, September 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500964010 -4040. 3544. VOID 3545. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco. Investigation of the steam condensate. Part II; RDR, 1965, No. 31, July 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965940 -5954. 3546. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco: Investigation of the steam condensate - New and confirmed structures; RDM, 1975, No. 33, August 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616364 -6370. 3547. Schumacher, J.N.: Turkish tobacco essential oil; RDM, 1978, No. 27, September 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607779 -7795. 3548. Schumacher, J.N.: Ecusta TOD 08715 low sidestream paper (magnesium oxide-filled paper containing 5% glass fiber); RDM, 1980, No. 17, May 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617683 -7687. 3549. Schumacher, J.N.: Composition of supercritical “extracts” of tobacco; R&DM, 1981, No. 34, August 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500609595 -9602. 3550. Schumacher, J.N.: Maryland tobacco; R&DR, 1982, No. 4, February 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501006126 -6151; Flavor composition of Maryland tobacco; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 25, 1982, p. 13; CORESTA 1982 Symp., Winston-Salem, NC, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper S11, 21–22; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1982) 271–278. 3551. Schumacher, J.N.: Review on pyrolysis of various tobacco additives; R&DM, 1983, No. 37, August 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661482 -1488. 3552. Schumacher, J.N. and E. Bernasek: Turkish tobacco. Isolation and characterization of ambreinolide; RDR, 1959, No. 12, May 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500933373 -3386. 3553. Schumacher, J.N., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: Smoke composition: A detailed investigation of the water-soluble portion of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1974, No. 7, September 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003488 -3512; Schumacher, J.N., C.R. Green, and F.W. Best: The composition of the water-soluble portion of cigarette smoke particulate phase; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 38, 1975, p. 27; Schumacher, J.N., C.R. Green, F.W. Best, and M.P. Newell: Smoke composition. An extensive investigation of the watersoluble portion of cigarette smoke; J. Agr. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 310–320. 3553a. Schumacher, J.N., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: Tobacco product; Belgian Patent No. 841,948 (1976), see Schumacher, J.N., F.W. Best, and C.R. Green: Tobacco product; U.S. Patent No. 4,056,108 (November 1, 1977). 3554. Schumacher, J.N. and E.A. Cheadle: Surface chemistry of Turkish tobacco; R&DM, 1983, No. 56, October 17. 3554a. Schumacher, J.N. and E.A. Cheadle: Chemical analysis of wet snuff and related studies; R&DM, 1984, No. 35, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503607718 -7770, 505109374 -9381. 3555. Schumacher, J.N., D.A. Colby, and G.R. Shelar: A literature study of licorice; R&DM, 1981, No. 10, March 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500609291 -9318.
1403
3556. Schumacher, J.N. and C.R. Green: Tetraester product; RDR, 1976, No. 8, February 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501004193 -4221. 3557. Schumacher, J.N., C.R. Green, and F.W. Best: Smoke composition: Homogenized vs. unhomogenized tobacco blend; RDR, 1972, No. 5, March 27, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501002566 -2626. 3558. Schumacher, J.N. and R.A. Heckman: On the natural occurrence and relative configurations of the tetrahydroactinidiolide isomers; Phytochemistry 10 (1971) 421–423. 3559. Schumacher, J.N., J.J. Murphy, J.M. Conner, and A.L. Angel: Sidestream smoke bases; R&DM, 1987, No. 54, March 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509803520 -3529. 3560. Schumacher, J.N. and L.L. Vestal: Turkish tobacco. Isolation and identification of some components of the essential oil of Turkish tobacco dust; RDR, 1962, No. 18, June 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500938952 -8981. 3561. Schumacher, J.N. and L.L. Vestal: Isolation and identification of some components of Turkish tobacco; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 47, 1973, p. 31; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 43–48. 3562. Schürch, O. and A. Winterstein: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Frage Tabak und Krebs [Experimental investigation of the question of tobacco and cancer]; Z. Krebsforsch. 42 (1935) 76–92. 3563. Schürch, O. and A. Winterstein: Experimentelle Beiträge zur Frage Tabak und Krebs [Experimental contribution to the question of tobacco and cancer]; Z. Krebsforsch. 46 (1937) 414–419. 3564. Schwarz, H.: Die Analyse des Rauches von Virginia Zigarren [Analysis of the smoke of Virginia cigars]; Dingler’s Polytech. J. 226 (1977) 305–307. 3565. Scott, I.M.: Opine content of unorganized and teratomatous tobacco crown gall tissues; Plant Sci. Lett. 16 (1979) 239–248. 3566. Scott, J.C., K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitrosoproline. An indicator of N-nitrosation of amines in tobacco products; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 40, 1982, p. 22. 3566a. Scott, R.J., J. Draper, and W. Paul: Tapetum-specific promoters from Brassicaceae spp; U.S. Patent No. 5,723,754 (March 3, 1998). 3567. Searle, C.E. (Editor): Chemical carcinogenesis; American Chemical Society Monograph 173, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1976). 3568. Searle, C.E. (Editor): Chemical carcinogens. Second edition; American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984). 3569. Seehofer, F.: On water balance during the smoking of a cigarette; CORESTA Tob. Smoke Group Mtg., Les Rasses, Switzerland (1966). 3570. Seehofer, F., H. Barkemeyer, and H. Borowski: Automatische Abrauchmaschine für Serienanalysen [An automatic smoking machine for serial analyses]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1961) 11–14. 3571. Seehofer, F. and H. Borowski: Eine WasserdampfDestillationsapparatus zur Nikotinbestimmung in Tabak und Rauchkondensaten sowie zur Gesamtsstickstoffbestimmung [A vapor-distillation apparatus for analyses of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke condensates as well as for the determination of total nitrogen]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 37–38.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1403
11/24/08 2:39:58 PM
1404
3572. Seehofer, F. and D. Hanssen: Die Kapillarpresse, eine Rauchmaschine zur Gewinnung von nativem Rauchkondensat. 2. Mitteilung: Die automatische Kapillarpresse [The capillary press, a smoking machine for collecting instant smoke condensate. 2: An automatic capillary press]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 291–300. 3573. Seehofer, F. and D. Hanssen: Die Kapillarpresse, eine Rauchmaschine zur Gewinnung von nativem Rauchkondensat. 3. Die automatische Kapillarpresse mit einem Rauchkopf für offenes oder geschlossenes Abrauchen [The capillary press, a smoking machine for the collection of native smoke condensate. 3. An automatic smoking machine equipped with a supplementary appliance for free and restricted smoking]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 358–370. 3574. Seehofer, F., D. Hanssen, and H.W. Lorenz: The formation and absorption of phenols in the cigarette according to puff order, moisture content, and tobacco type; CORESTA Tob. Smoke Group Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964). 3575. Seehofer, F., D. Hanssen, H. Rabitz, and R. Schröder: Über den Verbleib des Wassers beim Abrauchen. 2. Mitteilung [On the balance of total water content during the smoking of a cigarette. 2]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 491–503. 3576. Seehofer, F., D. Hanssen, and R. Schröder: Über zugweises Abrauchen und Pro-Zug-Analysen [Puff-bypuff smoking and individual puff analyses]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 135–150. 3577. Seehofer, F. and W. Schulz: Zur Kenntis des Glimmstromes von Cigaretten [Information on the smolder smoke stream from cigarettes]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 151–156. 3578. Seelkopf, C.: Über die Isolierung cancerogene Stoffe aus dem Zigarettenteer [On the isolation of cancerogenic substances from cigarette tar]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 100 (1955) 218–222. 3579. Seeman, J.I., M. Dixon, and H.-J. Haussman: Acetaldehyde in mainstream tobacco smoke: Formation and occurrence in smoke and bioavailability in the smoker; Chem. Res. Toxic. 15 (2002) 1331–1350. 3579a. Segura, G.: The contribution of cigarette paper to the benzo[a]pyrene in smoke; Memorandum to F.E. Resnik, February 1, 1966, see www.pmdocs.com 1000702895/2901; Resnik, F.E.: Contribution of cigarette paper to benzo[a]pyrene in smoke; Memorandum to H. Wakeham, February 1, 1966, see www.pmdocs. com 1001898064. 3580. Sekin, S.: Enzymatic determination of glucose, fructose, and sucrose in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 23 (1979) 75–77. 3580a. Sekiya, J., T. Yasuda, and Y. Yamada: Callus induction in tobacco, pea, rice and barley plants by auxins and their analogues; Plant Cell Physiol. 18 (1977) 1155–1157. 3581. Seligman, R.B.: Paper chromatography of carbonyl compounds; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper No. 15, 1954, p. 5. 3582. Seligman, R.B. and M.D. Edmonds: Chromatography of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone derivatives; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 8, 1955, pp. 4–5. 3583. Seligman, R.B., F.E. Resnik, A.E. O’Keeffe, J.C. Holmes, F.A. Morrell, and D.P. Murrill: New techniques of smoke analysis. I. Vapor-phase chromatography;
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3584.
3584a.
3585.
3585a.
3585b.
3585c.
3585d.
3585e.
3586.
3587.
3588.
3589.
3590. 3591.
3592.
9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 4, 1955, p. 2. Seligman, R.B., F.E. Resnik, A.E. O’Keeffe, J.C. Holmes, F.A. Morrell, D.P. Murrill, and F.L. Gager Jr: Gas chromatography in tobacco research; 129th Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Dallas, TX (1955); Tob. Sci. 1 (1955) 124–129. Selikoff, I.J., E.C. Hammond, and P.J. Lawther: Inhalation of benzpyrene and cancer in man; Ann. Mtg., Am. College Chest Phys., Chicago, IL (October 30, 1969). Sellars, M. and W.A. Mappus: The nitrogen distribution in tobacco and tobacco smoke: A preliminary report; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 18, 1955, p. 10. Sellakumar, A. and P. Shubik: Carcinogenicity of 7H-dibenzo[c,g]carbazole in the respiratory tract of hamsters; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 4 (1972) 1641. Senneca, O., A.M. Scamardella, S. Ciaravolo, G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Thermal decomposition of pesticides in the presence of oxygen. Part B: Benzimidazolic carbamates; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 23, 2006, p. 28–29. Senneca, O., F. Scherillo, S. Ciaravolo, G. Lionetti, F. Modestia, and A. Nunziata: Thermal decomposition of pesticides in the presence of oxygen. Part D: Pesticides containing one aromatic ring; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 25, 2006, pp. 29–30. Senneca, O., F. Scherillo, S. Ciaravolo, G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Thermal decomposition of pesticides in the presence of oxygen. Part A: Oxime carbamates; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 22, 2006, p. 28. Senneca, O., F. Scherillo, S. Ciaravolo, G. Lionetti, and A. Nunziata: Thermal decomposition of pesticides in the presence of oxygen. Part C: Pyrethroids; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 24, 2006, p. 29. Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr: Improved procedure for the determination of acids in tobacco smoke; RDR, 1961, No. 3, January 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509994706 -4722. Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr: Determination of oxides of nitrogen in tobacco smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 6, January 28 see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965606 -5625; RDM, 1967, No. 79, December 8, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613679 -3686. Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr and R.H. Cundiff: A new technique for determining the pH of whole tobacco smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 25, 1966, pp. 31–33; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 25–30. Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Determination of nitrate in tobacco; RDR, 1967, No. 43, December 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500968402 -8424. VOID Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr and H. Musselwhite: Nonaqueous titrimetric determination of carbonyl content using p-toluenesulfonylhydrazine; RDR, 1970, No. 39, August 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501000947 -0960. Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr and K.L. Rush: Colorimetric method for the determination of starch in tobacco; RDM, 1970,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1404
11/24/08 2:39:59 PM
1405
Bibliography
3593.
3594.
3595.
3596.
3597.
3598.
3599.
3600.
3601.
3602.
3603.
3604.
3605.
No. 6, January 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614190 -4204; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 55 (1972) 209–213. Sensabaugh, A.J. Jr, K.L. Rush, and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Automated method for the determination of plasticizers in cigarette filter rod material; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 117–121. Sera, N., H. Tokiwa, and T. Hirohata: Induction of nitroarenes in cigarette smoke condensates treated with nitrate; Toxicol. Lett. 50 (1990) 289–298. Serfontein, W.J. and P. Hurter: Occurrence of nitrosamines in the smoke of South African cigarettes; South African Med. J. 38 (1964) 617. Serfontein, W.J. and P. Hurter: Nitrosamines as environmental carcinogens. II. Occurrence of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke condensate; Manuscript (1965); Subsequently published as: Serfontein, W.J. and P. Hurter: Nitrosamines as environmental carcinogens. II. Evidence for the presence of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke condensate; Cancer Res. 26 (1966) 575–579. Serfontein, W.J. and P. Hurter: A method for identifying small amounts of nitrosamines in biological material; Nature 209 (1966) 1238–1239. Serfontein, W.J. and P. Hurter: Nitrosamines as environmental carcinogens. II. Evidence for the presence of nitrosamines in tobacco smoke condensate; Cancer Res. 26 (1966) 575–579. Serfontein, W.J. and P. Hurter: On the possible significance of N-nitrosamines as environmental carcinogens in the problem of human carcinogenesis; 9th Internat. Cancer Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1966); Nitrosamines as environmental carcinogens. A review of the chemical and biological aspects; S. African Cancer Bull. 10 (1966) 62–70. Serfontein, W.J. and J.H. Smit: Evidence for the occurrence of N-nitrosamines in tobacco; Nature 214 (1967) 169–170. Service d’Exploitation Industrielle des Tabacs et Allumettes (SEITA): Les heterocycles azotes dans le condensat de fumée de cigarette [The nitrogen heterocycles in cigarette smoke condensate]; SEITA, Paris, France (1965) pp. 1–4. Service d’Exploitation Industrielle des Tabacs et Allumettes (SEITA): Mise au point de méthode de dosage et applications-dosages des polyphenols individuels (benzocatéchine, hydroquinone, scopoletine) dans la fumée de cigarette: Selectivité de filtration des phenols comparant des filtres acétate et cellulose [Method to determine the yield of individual polyphenols (catechol, hydroquinone, scopoletin) in cigarette smoke: Selectivity of phenols filtration comparing cellulose acetate and cellulose filters]; SEITA, Paris, France (1965) pp. 1–24. Settle, V.A., R.T. Walker, R.D. Stevens, and M.A. Sudholt: A fast chromatography method for simultaneous analysis of menthol, propylene glycol, and glycerol using a multicapillary column; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 67, 1999, p. 57. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, J.F. Chaplin, and R.E. Williamson: Use of pale-yellow tobacco to reduce smoke polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; J. Agr. Food Chem. 27 (1979) 896–900. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Correlation of smoke polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
3606.
3607.
3608.
3608a.
3609.
3610.
3611.
3612.
3613.
3613a.
and leaf lipid levels in pale-yellow and normal-green flue-cured tobacco; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 34, 1977, p. 18. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, O.T. Chortyk, C.R. Green, and A.W. Johnson: Isolation and characterization of the sucrose esters of the cuticular waxes of green tobacco leaf; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 11, 1983, p. 6; Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, O.T. Chortyk, C.R. Green, F.A. Thome, J.L. Stewart, and A.W. Johnson: Isolation and characterization of the sucrose esters of the cuticular waxes of green tobacco leaf; J. Agr. Food Chem. 33 (1985) 870–875. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, O.T. Chortyk, L.B. Smith, J.F. Chaplin, G.R. Gwynn, and A.W. Johnson: The cuticular chemistry of green tobacco leaf; esters of the cuticular waxes of green tobacco leaf; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 43, 1981, p. 23; Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, O.T. Chortyk, A.W. Johnson, D.M. Jackson, G.R. Gwynn, J.F. Chaplin, and M.G. Stephenson: Quantitation of major cuticular components from green leaf of different tobacco types; J. Agr. Food Chem. 32 (1984) 566–570. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, O.T. Chortyk, and E.M. Snook: A rapid method for the determination of leaf-to-smoke transfer of tobacco lipids; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 26, 1977, p. 14; A method for determining the transfer of lipids from tobacco to smoke; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 130–133. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, K.L. McDuffie, and O.T. Chortyk: A rapid GC-2 method for tobacco alkaloids; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 6, 1979, p. 3. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, K.L. McDuffie, and O.T. Chortyk: A modified method for the rapid analysis of long-chained alkanes and neophytadiene from tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 27–32. Severson, R.F., O.T. Chortyk: and W.J. Chamberlain: Gamma radiation effects on cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 136–140. Severson, R.F., O.T. Chortyk: and G.R. Gwynn: Analysis of lipids in green and cured tobaccos: Application to normal and budworm-resistant tobaccos; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 14, 1978, p. 7. Severson, R.F., J.J. Ellington, R.F. Arrendale, and M.E. Snook: Quantitative gas chromatographic method for the analysis of aliphatic hydrocarbons, terpenes, fatty alcohols, fatty acids and sterols in tobacco; J. Chromatog. 160 (1978) 155–168. Severson, R.F., J.J. Ellington, P.F. Schlotzhauer, and R.F. Arrendale: A method for the rapid, quantitative determination of free and bound solanesol in tobacco; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 23, 1976, p. 20. Severson, R.F., A.W. Johnson, and D.M. Jackson: Cuticular constituents of tobacco: Factors affecting their production and their role in insect and disease resistance and smoke quality; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 11 (1985) 105–174.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1405
11/24/08 2:39:59 PM
1406
3613b. Severson, R.F. and K.L. McDuffie: Rapid GC-2 analysis for tobacco hydrocarbons and neophytadiene; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 7, 1979, p. 4. 3614. Severson, R.F., K.L. McDuffie, R.F. Arrendale, G.R. Gwynn, J.F. Chaplin, and A.W. Johnson: Rapid method for the analysis of tobacco nicotine alkaloids; J. Chromatogr. 211 (1981) 111–121. 3615. Severson, R.F., W.S. Schlotzhauer, R.F. Arrendale, and M.E. Snook: Correlation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon formation between pyrolysis and smoking; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 44, 1975, p. 30; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 23–37. 3616. Severson, R.F., W.S. Schlotzhauer, O.T. Chortyk, R.F. Arrendale, and M.E. Snook: Precursors of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; in: 3rd International Symposium on Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis, edited by P.W. Jones and P. Leber, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI (1979) 277–298. 3617. Severson, R.F., M.E. Snook, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Comparison of levels of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in the smoke of different cigarettes; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 19, 1975, p. 18. 3618. Severson, R.F., M.E. Snook, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Gas chromatographic quantitation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 1866–1872. 3619. Severson, R.F., M.E. Snook, W.J. Chamberlain, and O.T. Chortyk: A chromatographic analysis of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in small quantities of cigarette smoke condensate; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 39, 1974, p. 27; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 273–282. 3620. Severson, R.F., M.E. Snook, H.C. Higman, O.T. Chortyk, and F.J. Akin: Isolation, identification, and quantitation of the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; Carcinogenesis Comp. Survey 1 (1976) 253–270. 3621. Severson, R.F., M.G. Stephenson, A.W. Johnson, D.M. Jackson, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and preparative chromatograpy of the major cuticular diterpenes in green tobacco; Tob. Sci. 32 (1988) 99–103. 3622. Shafik, D.: Chemical composition and physical and smoking properties of Turkish tobacco grown in Iraq; Ph. D. Thesis, Plovdiv, Bulgaria (1966). 3622a. Shah, D.M., S.G. Rogers, R.B. Horsch, and R.T. Fraley: Glyphosate-resistant plants; U.S. Patent No. 4,940,835 (July 10, 1990). 3623. Shakhnovski, L.N.: Der Einfluss von Ammoniak auf die Geschmacksstarke von Rauchwaren [The influence of ammonia on the strength of the taste of smoke]; Tabak (USSR) 15(3) (1954) 40–44. 3624. Shakhnovski, L.N.: The chemical composition of the smoke of some tobacco products; Tabak (USSR) 21(4) (1960) 17–20. 3625. Shamberger, R.J.: Reduced benzo[a]pyrene and phenolic content from experimental cigarettes; Nature 211 (1966) 86. 3625a. Shaobing, H., S.K Dube, N.M. Barnett, and S. Kung: Nucleotide sequence of gene oee2-A and its cDNA
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3626.
3626a.
3627.
3628.
3629.
3630.
3631.
3632.
3633. 3634.
3635.
3636.
3637 3638.
3639.
3640.
3641.
encoding 23 kDa polypeptide of the oxygen-evolving complex of photosystem II in tobacco; Plant Mol. Biol. 17 (1991) 551–553. Shaw, W.G.J., R.L. Stephens, and J.A. Weybrew: Carbonyl constituents of the volatile oils from flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 179–181. Shcherbakov, R.A. and N.V. Shalygo: Determination of chlorophyll synthetase activity in green tobacco leaves using exogenous Zn-chlorophyllide a; J. Appl. Spectroscopy 73 (2006) 103–106. Shear, M.J. and J. Leiter: Studies in carcinogenesis. XVI. Production of subcutaneous tumors in mice by miscellaneous polycyclic compounds; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2 (1941) 241–258. Sheen, S.J.: The colorimetric determination of chlorogenic acid and rutin in tobacco leaves; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 116–120. Sheen, S.J. and J. Calvert: Quantitative variation in polyphenols content in the green and air-cured leaves of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.); Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 10–12. Sheen, S.J., D.L. Davis, D.W. DeJong, and J.F. Chaplin: Gas-liquid chromatographic quantitation of solanesol in chlorophyll mutants in tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 259–262. Sheen, S.J., D.W. DeJong, and J.F. Chaplin: Polyphenol accumulation in chlorophyll mutants of tobacco under two cultural practices; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1079) 57–65. Sheen, S.J. and J.L. Hamilton: Chlorophyllase activity and chlorophyll degradation in tobacco chlorophyll genotypes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1983) 29–35. Sheets, T.J.: Pesticide residues on tobacco: Perceptions and realities; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 17 (1991) 33–65. Sheets, T.J. and R.B. Leidy: Influence of insecticides and nematicides on the chemistry of tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 5 (1979) 83–131. Sheets, T.J., R.B. Leidy, P.L. Messick, J.W. Laws, J.S. Hayes, W.L. Jones, and S.A. Meyers: Pesticide residues in tobacco, tobacco products, and mainstream smoke; 13–16 Annual Reports of fate of pesticide residues on tobacco, Project NC 03699, NC Agricultural Research Service, NC State University, Raleigh, NC (1985, 1986, 1987). Sheets, T.J. and H. Seltmann: Residue and sucker control from two formulations of maleic hydrazide (MH); Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 55–58. Sheets, T.J., J.W. Smith, and M.D. Jackson: Insecticide residues in cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 66–69. Shelar, G.R.: The effect of cigarette lighting technique on the benzo[a]pyrene in mainstream smoke; RDM, 1977, No. 6, February 10, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617080 -7083. Shelar, G.R.: Analysis of selected Amadori compounds in tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1982, No. 49, November 9, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501660405 -0417. Shelar, G.R.: The effects of salts on mainstream and sidestream smoke; R&DM, 1983, No. 59, October 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661990 -2010. Shelar, G.R. and D.A. Colby: Analysis of chlorogenic acid, scopoletin, and rutin in tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 48, December 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512048564 -8573.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1406
11/24/08 2:39:59 PM
Bibliography
3642. Shelar, G.R. and D.A. Colby: Analysis of the vanillin in filter rods by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 42, November 3, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500609767 -9777. 3643. Shelar, G.R. and D.A. Colby: Analysis of vanillin, ethylvanillin, piperonal, and coumarin in smoking tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 49, December 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618912 -8920. 3644. Shelar, G.R., T.R. Conner, and D.A. Colby: Analysis of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 40, October 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500609747 -9759. 3645. Shelar, G.R., T.R. Conner, and D.A. Colby: Analysis of carotene in tobacco by high-performance liquid chromatography; R&DM, 1981, No. 51, December 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618931 -8940. 3646. Sheng, W., F. Xie, M. Wu, and M. Zhao: Study of polyphenols in burley tobacco during growing, harvesting and curing; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 83, 2004, pp. 73–74. 3646a. Shepherd, J.A.: Major tobacco disease. C. Nematode pests of tobacco; Chapter 6C in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 216–227. 3647. Shieh, S.F., B.H. Song, and D.L. Davis: Pyrolytic formation of some polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from the ionones. 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol.33 , Paper No. 52, 1979, p. 28. 3648. Shigematsu, A., J.D. Adams, J. Camanzo, E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Steam-volatile components in the tobacco and mainstream smoke of cigarettes with low “tar” yields; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 12, 1983, p. 7. 3649. Shigematsu, H. and H. Kitami: Identification of polyhydroxyalkylpyrazines in tobacco leaves and tobacco flavor prepared by sugar-amine reaction; Nippon Sembai Kosha Chuo Kenkyuho Kenkyu Hokoku (1978) 7–14. 3650. Shigematsu, H., R. Ono, Y. Yamashita, and Y. Kaburaki: Studies on composition of tobacco smoke. Part XVI. Volatile compounds from the neutral fraction of tobacco smoke condensates (2); Agr. Biol. Chem. 35 (1971) 1751–1758. 3651. Shim, H.-S. and M.R. Hajaligol: Effects of pyrolysis conditions on tobacco and pectin char oxidation kinetics; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 37, 2000, pp. 39–40. 3652. Shimkin, M.B.: Pulmonary tumors in experimental animals; Adv. Cancer Res. 3 (1955) 223–267, see p. 252. 3653. Shin, E.-J., N. Mark, and R.J. Evans: Gas phase kinetic studies of the formation of aromatics in the pyrolysis of biomass; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 34, 2000, p. 38 3654. Shin, Y.K., D.S. Noh, Q. Chae, and K.K. Yu: High performance liquid chromatographic determination of nitrosonornicotine in Korean tobacco and smoke; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 57, 1979, p. 31.
1407
3655. Shinagawa, K., T. Tokomoto, and K. Shirane: Spin trapping of nitric oxide in aqueous solutions of cigarette smoke; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 253 (1998) 99–103. 3655a. Shklar, G.: Oral mucosa carcinogenesis in hamsters. Inhibition by vitamin E; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 68 (1982) 791–797. 3655b. Shmuk, A.A.: Research on the acids of tobacco; U.S.S.R. State Inst. Tobacco Invest. Bull. 50 (1929) 1–10; Shmuk, A.A. and N. Piatnicki: Acids of tobacco. II. J. Assoc. Off. Agr. Chem. 69 (1930) 19–26. 3655c. Shmuk, A.A. (editor): Research on the chemistry of tobacco; Gosudartsvennyi Inst. Tabakovedeniya Publ. No. 80 (1931) 3656. Shmuk, A.A.: Inositol in tobacco; U.S.S.R. State Inst. Tobacco Invest. Bull. 69 (1930) 15–18, see Chem. Abstr. 25 (1930) 3124. 3656a. Shmuk, A.A.: On the identification of fatty materials in the composition of tobacco leaves. Collected works on the chemistry of tobacco and Makhorka; Vsesoyuznuii Inst. Tabaknoi Prom. 133 (1937) 3–9. 3657. Shmuk, A.A.: The chemistry and technology of tobacco; Pishchepromizdat, Moscow (1961) pp. 1–768. 3658. Shmuk, A.A., S.M. Kashirin, and A.P. Smirnov: Denicotinizing cigarettes by filtration of the smoke; Vsesoyuznuii Inst. Tabaknoi Prom. 90 (1932) 66–71. 3659. Shmuk, A.A. and M. Kolesnik: The reaction of tobacco smoke in connection with the quality of tobacco; Narkom. SSSR-Soyuztabak Gosudar. Inst. Tabak Bull. 80 (1931) 45–52. 3660. Shmuk, A.A. and V.N. Shirokaya: The separation of tobacco and Makhorka into fractions; Vsesoyuznuii Inst. Tabaknoi Prom. 109 (1934) 77–87. 3661. Shober, R.A., J.E. Hess, and J.S. Kauffman: Productivity gains in test methods for the extraction and analysis of TSNAs in tobacco; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 8, 2000, p. 21. 3661a. Shoemaker, P.B. and H.D. Shew: Major tobacco disease. A. Fungal and bacterial diseases; Chapter 6A in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 183–197. 3662. Shoffner, R.A. and M.S. Ireland: Rapid analysis of menthol and nicotine in smoke and the effects of air dilution on delivery; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 19, 1980, p. 10; Tob. Sci. 26 (1982) 109–112. 3663. Shubik, P.: Personal communication to E.L. Wynder, see Footnote, Table 1 in: Wynder, E.L., E.A. Graham, and A.B. Croninger: Experimental production of carcinoma with cigarette tar; Cancer Res. 13 (1953) 855–864. 3663a. Shubik, P., G. Della Porta, E. Spencer, and G. Pietra: The inhibition of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene skin carcinogenesis by simultaneous application of urethan; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(4) (1958) 345–346. 3664. Shubik, P. and J.L. Hartwell: Survey of compounds which have been tested for carcinogenic activity, Suppl. 1; USPHS Publ. No. 149, Washington, DC (1957). 3665. Shubik, P. and J.L. Hartwell: Survey of compounds which have been tested for carcinogenic activity, Suppl. 2; USPHS Publ. No. 149, Washington, DC (1969). 3665a. Sidahmed, R. and S.C. Mohapatra: Relationship between tobacco cell wall chemistry and industrial grades; 43rd
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1407
11/24/08 2:39:59 PM
1408
3666.
3667.
3668.
3669.
3670.
3670a.
3671.
3672.
3672a.
3673.
3674.
3675.
3676.
3677.
3678.
3679.
3679a.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 14, 1989, p. 20. Siddiqui, I.R. and N. Rosa: Structural investigation of sodium hydroxide-soluble tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) polysaccharides: A xylan; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 41–42. Siddiqui, I.R. and N. Rosa: Low molecular weight carbohydrates of tobacco; 83rd Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Las Vegas (1982); Tob. Sci. 27 (1983) 130–134. Siddiqui, I.R., N. Rosa, and L. Benzing: An Amadori compound from tobacco; Carbohydrate Res. 98 (1981) 57–63. Siddiqui, I.R., N. Rosa, and G.R. Woolard: Structural investigation of water soluble tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) polysaccharides: Pectic polysaccharides; Tob. Sci. 28 (1984) 122–126. Silberbauer, R.: Physiologische Bestimmung des Nikotingehalts des Rauches von Zigarren, Zigaretten und Pfeifentabaken [Physiological determination of nicotine content of cigar, cigarette, and pipe tobacco smoke]; Medical Inaugural Dissertation Erlangen (1919). Siminszky, B. and R.E. Dewey: Developing a genomic resource for elucidating the mechanism of nicotine to nornicotine conversion; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 30 (2004) 39–59. Sims, J.L., W.O. Atkinson, and F. Benner: Nitrogen fertilization and genotype effects on selected constituents of smoke from all-burley cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 23 (1979) 11–13. Sims, J.L., J.L. Hamilton, and J.F. Chaplin: Effects of rates of Nitrapyrin and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and chemical composition of burley leaf tobacco and smoke; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 5, 1982, p. 3. Sinclair, N.M. and B.E. Frost: Rapid method for the determination of benzo[a]pyrene in the particulate phase of cigarette smoke by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection; Analyst 103 (1978) 1199–1203. Sinex, F.M. and B. Faris: The reaction of tobacco smoke condensate with collagen and elastin; Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Boston, MA (1959). Singer, G.M. and D. Hoffmann, 4-N-Alkylaminophenols in cigarette smoke; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 22, 1971, p. 13. Singer, R.G.M. and W. Lijinsky: Naturally occurring nitrosatable amines. II. Secondary amines in tobacco and cigarette smoke condensate; J. Agr. Food Chem. 24 (1976) 553–555. Sipes, G.E.: A comparison of methods for the analysis of coumarin; RDM, 1970, No. 55, May 27, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500614604 -4609. Sisler, E.C.: Effects of elevated temperature on tobacco leaf respiration and O-phenol oxidation; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 72–74. Sisler, E.C.: Induction of chlorophyllase in tobacco leaves by ethylene and auxin; Tob. Sci. 31 (1987) 20–22. Sisson, V.A. and R.F. Severson: Leaf chemistry of the Nicotiana species - Hydrocarbons (C25-C36); 39th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 39, Paper No. 43, 1985, p. 23. Sittig, M.: Tobacco substitutes; Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, NJ (1976) 1–182.
3680. Skrable, K.W., F.J. Haughey, and E.L. Alexander: Polonium-210 in cigarette smokers; Nature 146 (1964) 86–87. 3681. Skrentny, R.F. and H.W. Dorough: Efficiencies of several extraction procedures for removing organochlorine insecticides from tobacco; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 111–113. 3682. Skumburdis, K. and R. Kissling: Zur Frage der Denikotinisierung des Tabakrauches während des Rauchens [The question of denicotinization of tobacco smoke while smoking]; Chem. Ztg. 56 (1932) 208. 3683. Slaga, T.J. and R.K. Boutwell: Inhibition of the tumor-initiating ability of the potent carcinogen 7,12dimethylbenz[a]anthracene by the weak tumor initiator 1,2,3,4-dibenzanthracene; Cancer Res. 37 (1977) 129–133. 3684. Slaga, T.J. and W.M. Bracken: The effect of antioxidants on skin tumor initiation and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase; Cancer Res. 37 (1977) 1631–1635. 3685. Slaga, T.J. and J. DiGiovanni: Inhibition of chemical carcinogenesis; in: Chemical carcinogens, Second edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) pp. 1279–1321. 3686. Slaga, T.J., L. Jecker, W.M. Bracken, and C.E. Weeks: The effects of weak or non-carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons on 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene and benzo[a]pyrene; Cancer Lett. 7 (1979) 51–59. 3687. Slaga, T.J., V.I. Solanki, and M. Logani: Studies on the mechanism of action of antitumor promoting agents: Suggestive evidence for the involvement of free radicals in promotion; in: Radioprotectors and anticarcinogens, edited by O.F. Ngaard and M.G. Simic, Academic Press, New York, NY (1983) 471–485. 3688. Slaga, T.J., A. Viaje, S.G. Buty, and W.M. Bracken: Dibenz[a,c]anthracene: A potent inhibitor of skin-tumor initiation by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; Res. Comm. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 19 (1978) 477–483. 3689. Slanki, J.M. and R.J. Moshy: Separation and quantitative analysis of polyhydric alcohol humectants in tobacco products; J. Chromatog. 35 (1968) 94–98. 3690. Sloan, C.H.: Coulometric determination of hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 33, 1978, p. 18; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 106–110. 3691. Sloan, C.H. and J.E. Kiefer: Kinetics of the oxidation of nitric oxide to nitrogen dioxide in cigarette smoke; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 42, 1968, p. 25; Determination of NO and NO2 in cigarette smoke from kinetic data; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 180–182. 3692. Sloan, C.H., J.S. Lewis, and G.P. Morie: Computerization of the gas-phase analysis of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 21 (1977) 57. 2693. Sloan, C.H. and G.P. Morie: Determination of ammonia in tobacco and tobacco smoke with an ammonia electrode; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 23, 1973, p. 19; Acta 69 (1974) 243–247. 3694. Sloan, C.H. and G.P. Morie: Determination of nitrogen oxides in cigarette smoke with a nitrate electrode; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 98–99. 3695. Sloan, C.H. and G.P. Morie: Method for the determination of unprotonated ammonia in cigarette smoke; 29th
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1408
11/24/08 2:39:59 PM
Bibliography
3696.
3697.
3698. 3699.
3700.
3701.
3701a.
3702.
3703.
3704.
3705.
3706.
3707.
3708.
3709.
3710.
Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 16, 1975, p. 16; Determination of unprotonated ammonia in whole cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 362–365. Sloan, C.H. and B.J. Sublett: Moisture content of the particulate phase of smoke from filter and nonfilter cigarettes; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 20, 1964, pp. 31–33; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 70–74. Sloan, C.H. and B.J. Sublett: Colorimetric method of analysis for nitrates in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 10 (1967) 122–125. Sloan, C.H. and B.J. Sublett: Determination of methyl nitrite in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 21–24. Small, H.G. Jr and C.B. McCants: Residual arsenic in soils and concentration in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 34–36. Smeby, R.R.: Phenols and phenolic pigments in tobacco; RDR, 1956, No. 4, April 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500930049 -0068. Smeby, R.R. and S.A. Bellin: Occurrence of malonic acid in tobacco; RDM, 1955, No. 7, January 31, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610153 -0154. Smeby, R.R. and S.A. Bellin: Organic acids in the growing tobacco plant; RDM, 1955, No. 12, November 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501663342 -3387. Smeeton, B.W.: Tobacco cell-wall constituents. I. A literature survey of agronomic and genetic variability; R&DM, 1986, No. 53, April 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505447658 -7687. Smeeton, B.W. and K.A. Bridle: Leaf surface chemistry. I. Genetic variability; R&DM, 1983, No. 18, April 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501661123 -1134. Smeeton, B.W. and K.A. Bridle: Leaf surface chemistry. II. Genetic control; R&DM, 1984, No. 41, June 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505109556 -9567. Smeeton, B.W. and K.A. Bridle: Amino acid and polyphenol contents of tobacco and their correlation with Ames assay revertants; R&DM, 1988, No. 283, November 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511211553 -1583. Smeeton, B.W. and K.A. Bridle: Leaf surface constituents of Greek Oriental tobacco; R&DM, 1988, No. 309, November 17; Smeeton, B.W., K.A. Bridle, and G. Symeonides: Genetic and environmental effects on leaf surface chemistry of aromatic Greek tobaccos; July 10, 1989, see www.rjrtdocs.com 513541086 -1095, 524462453 -2462. Smeeton, B.W., C.K. Lee, E.A. Reed, and G.P. Dobson: Ames test on smoke condensate: A summary: Part 2 (1983–1984); R&DM, 1985, No. 19, February 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504147613 -7623, 508352337 -2348, 518370024 -0075. Smirnov, A.I., M.P. Platnisky, A.P. Smirnov, and A.A. Sirotenko: Biochemie des tabacs; Utigeverij, The Hague (1940) pp. 4–64. Smirnov, A.M. and I.G. Mokhnachev, Smoking properties and chemical composition of tobacco; Tabak (U.S.S.R.) 34(2) (1973) 42–43. Smirnov, A.P. and A.A. Sirotenko: Studies on aromatic substances in tobacco smoke; Vsesoy. NauchnoIssled. Inst. Tabach 140 (1939) 103–108, see Shmuk, A.A.: Collected works on the chemistry of tobacco and Makhorka, Vol. 8 (1939).
1409
3710a. Smith, C.J., G.L. Dooly, and S.C. Moldoveanu: A new technique using solid phase extraction (SPE) for the analysis of aromatic amines in mainstream cigarette smoke; J. Chromatogr. A. 991 (2003) 99–107. 3711. Smith, C.J., S.D. Livingston, and D.J. Doolittle: An international literature survey of “IARC Group 1 carcinogens” reported in mainstream smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 35 (1997) 1107–1130; Letter to the Editor: Response to D.J. Fitzgerald (1999), [re IARC Group 1 Carcinogens]: Letter to the Editor; Food Chem. Toxicol. 37 (1999) 265–266. 3712. Smith, C.J., T.A. Perfetti, M.J. Morton, A. Rodgman, R. Garg, C.D. Selassie, and C. Hansch: The relative toxicity of substituted phenols reported in cigarette mainstream smoke; 2002 CORESTA Congress, New Orleans, LA Paper ST 9; Toxicol. Sci. 69 (2002) 265–278. 3713. Smith, C.J., T.A. Perfetti, M.A. Rumple, A. Rodgman, and D.J. Doolittle: An international literature survey of IARC carcinogens in cigarette mainstream smoke; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 28, 1999, pp. 34–35; “IARC Group 2A carcinogens” reported in cigarette mainstream smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 39 (2000) 371–383. 3714. Smith, C.J., T.A. Perfetti, M.A. Rumple, A. Rodgman, and D.J. Doolittle: “IARC Group 2B Carcinogens” reported in cigarette mainstream smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 38 (2000) 825–848; Food Chem. Toxicol. 39 (2001) 183–205. [correction of publication (Food Chem. Toxicol. 38 (2000) 825–848)]. 3715. Smith, C.J., D.C. Sykes, D.W. Cantrell, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Dioxin levels in mainstream smoke from cigarettes with different TPM deliveries; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 205–209. 3716. Smith, G.A.L. and D.A. King: Separation and identification of the steam volatile phenols present in cigarette smoke condensate by capillary gas liquid chromatography; Chem. and Ind. (1964) 540–541. 3717. Smith, G.A.L. and D.A. King: Determination of the steam-volatile phenols present in cigarette-smoke condensate. Part I. Colorimetric determination of the total steam-volatile phenols; Analyst 89 (1964) 305–311. 3718 Smith, G.A.L. and D.A. King: An improvement in the colorimetric determination of the total steam-volatile phenols present in cigarette smoke condensate; Analyst 90 (1965) 55–56. 3719. Smith, G.A.L. and P.J. Sullivan: Determination of the steam-volatile phenols present in cigarette-smoke condensate. Part II. Determination of phenol, the cresols, and guaiacol by thin-layer chromatography; Analyst 89 (1964) 312–318. 3720. Smith, G.A.L., P.J. Sullivan, and W.J. Irvine: The determination of oxidizable nitrogen oxides present in cigarette smoke; Analyst 92 (1967) 456–462. 3721. Smith, J.K.: Isolation of aflatoxin-related substance from tobacco; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 28 (1974) 170–171. 3722. Smith, R. and S.A. Landaw: Tar, nicotine, and now CO; Emergency Med. 10(4) (1978) 176, 178. 3722a. Smith, R.M., G.A. Solaki, W.P. Hayes, and R.J. Stretton: Pyrolysis-gas chromatography of histidine and 3-methylhistidine; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 1 (1980) 197–201. 3722b. Smith, W.D.: Agronomy and physiology. B. Seedling production; Chapter 4B in: Tobacco: Production,
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1409
11/24/08 2:40:00 PM
1410
3722c. 3723.
3724.
3725.
3726.
3727.
3727a.
3728.
3728a.
3729.
3730. 3731.
3732.
3733.
3734.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 70–75. Smith, W.E.: The sebaceous gland suppression test; Internat. Cancer Cong., São Paolo (1954). Smith, W.T. Jr, N. Brahme, M. Fakes, and J.M. Patterson: Thermal and photodegradation studies of maleic hydrazide; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 60, 1979, p. 33. Smith, W.T. Jr, S.P. Chen, and J.M. Patterson: Effect of pyrolytic parameters on cyanide production in pyrolysis of tobacco; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 27, 1974, p. 21; Effect of some pyrolytic parameters on cyanide production during controlled pyrolysis of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 50–52. Smith, W.T. Jr, N.F. Haidar, L. Braun, and J.M. Patterson: Pyrolysis of 13C-labeled maleic hydrazide; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 55, 1978, p. 30. Smith, W.T. Jr, N.F. Haidar, and J.M. Patterson: Pyrolysis of valine, A-aminobutyric acid and proline; Tob. Sci. 19 (1975) 142–144. Smith, W.T. Jr, N.F. Haidar, J.M. Patterson, P.S. Sabharwal, and J.M. Lockard: Pyrolysis of Carbaryl; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 10, 1980, p. 5. Smith, W.T. Jr, T.B. Harris, and J.M. Patterson: Pyrolysis of soybean protein and an amino acid composition; J. Agr. Food Chem. 22 (1974) 480–483. Smith, W.T. Jr, C.F. Mayer, C.S. Kook, and J.M. Patterson, Controlled pyrolysis of maleic hydrazide; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 42, 1975, p. 29. Smith, W.T. Jr and J.M. Patterson: Investigations on the effect of structural variations on the composition of amino acid pyrolyzates; University of Kentucky Research Foundation, USDA Contract No. 12–14– 100–9476-(73), Tobacco and Health Contract III, Final Report, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/gow85d00, Bates Numbers 503579876/9912. Smith, W.T. Jr, C.Y. Shiue, and J.M. Patterson: Pyrolysis of sulfur amino acids; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 17, 1970, p. 11. Smyth, C.N.: Tobacco smoke; Brit. Med. J. 1959(i) 506–507. Snell, F.D. Inc.: The tar and nicotine content of the four most popular brands of Cuban cigars; Bol. Liga Cancer 34 (1959) 120–122. Snook, M.E.: Gel filtration of methyl-substituted polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; Anal. Chim. Acta 81 (1976) 423–427. Snook, M.E.: Gel elution of heterocyclic analogues of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from bio-beads; Anal. Chim. Acta 99 (1978) 299–304. Snook, M.E.: Nitrogen analogues of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke; in: Carcinogenesis: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Vol. 3, edited by P.W. Jones and R.I. Freudenthal, Raven Press, New York, NY (1978) 203–215.
3735. Snook, M.E., R.F. Arrendale, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation of indoles and carbazoles from cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chem. 50 (1978) 88–90. 3736. Snook, M.E., W.J. Chamberlain, R.F. Severson, and O.T. Chortyk: Chromatographic concentration of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 47 (1975) 1155–1157. 3737. Snook, M.E. and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of phenolic acids in smoke by gel adsorption and fused silica glass capillary gas chromatography; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 13, 1982, p. 7. 3738. Snook, M.E. and O.T. Chortyk: An improved extractionHPLC method for tobacco polyphenols; Tob. Sci. 26 (1982) 25–29. 3739. Snook, M.E. and O.T. Chortyk: A rapid GC-2 determination of harman and norharman in smoke; 36th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 36, Paper No. 14, 1982, p. 7; The rapid determination of harman and norharman in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 28 (1984) 36–40. 3740. Snook, M.E. and O.T. Chortyk: Capillary gas chromatography of carbolines: Application to cigarette smoke; J. Chromatog. 245 (1982) 331–338. 3741. Snook, M.E. and O.T. Chortyk: Advances in lipophilic gel chromatography of tobacco and tobacco smoke components; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 12 (1986) 237–297. 3742. Snook, M.E., O.T. Chortyk, and R.F. Arrendale: Isolation and identification of N’-acylalkaloids of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 227–243. 3743. Snook, M.E., O.T. Chortyk, and R.F. Arrendale: Isolation and identification of the phenolic acids of tobacco smoke; Tob. Sci. 29 (1985) 25–31. 3743a. Snook, M.E., O.T. Chortyk, and A.S. Caines: Tobacco root compounds inhibit the growth of black shank fungus in a laboratory bioassay; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 28, 1989, p. 27. 3744. Snook, M.E., O.T. Chortyk, H.C. Higman, and P.J. Fortson: Application of gel chromatography to effect a more complete characterization of phenols from cigarette smoke condensate; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 44, 1978, p. 24. 3745. Snook, M.E. and P.J. Fortson: Gel chromatographic isolation of catechols and hydroquinones; Anal. Chem. 51 (1979) 1814–1819. 3746. Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, and O.T. Chortyk: A one-step gel chromatographic isolation of catechols and hydroquinones from cigarette smoke condensate; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 45, 1978, p. 24. 3747. Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, and O.T. Chortyk: Application of gel chromatography to characterize more completely the phenols of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 24 (1980) 30–36. 3748. Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, and O.T. Chortyk: Gel chromatography for the isolation of phenolic acids from tobacco leaf; Anal. Chem. 53 (1981) 374–377. 3749. Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of phenolic acids from tobacco leaf; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 19–26. 3750. Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, L.B. Smith, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of aza-arenes of tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1410
11/24/08 2:40:00 PM
Bibliography
3751.
3752.
3753.
3754.
3755.
3756.
3757.
3758.
3759.
3760.
3760a.
3760b.
3761.
smoke; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 46, 1978, p. 25; Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of aza-arenes of tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 67–78. Snook, M.E., P.J. Fortson, L.B. Smith, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of phenolic acids from tobacco; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 8, 1979, p. 4. Snook, M.E., H.C. Higman, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of nitrogen analogs of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 47, 1976, p. 32. Snook, M.E., W.S. Schlotzhauer, and W.J. Chamberlain: Chromatographic isolation of catechols, resorcinols, and hydroquinones of cigarette smoke condensate: Application of gel filtration chromatography; Tob. Sci. 22 (1978) 106–108. Snook, M.E., W.S. Schlotzhauer, G.R. Gwynn, and O.T. Chortyk: Evaluation of low polyphenol tobaccos for pyrolysis production of catechols; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 24, 1989, p. 28. Snook, M.E., W.S. Schlotzhauer, R.F. Arrendale, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Behavior of hydrolyzed tobacco leaf lipids during gel chromatography; Tob. Sci. 23 (1979) 38–42. Snook, M.E., R.F. Severson, R.F. Arrendale, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: High molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of cigarette smoke; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 21, 1975, p. 19; The identification of high molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in a biologically active fraction of cigarette smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1977) 79–101. Snook, M.E., R.F. Severson, R.F. Arrendale, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Multi-alkylated polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke: Separation and identification; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 222–247. Snook, M.E., R.F. Severson, H.C. Higman, R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke: Isolation and identification; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 250–272. Snook, M.E., R.F. Severson, H.C. Higman, and O.T. Chortyk: Isolation and identification of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons of tobacco smoke; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 40, 1974, p. 27. Snow, J.P., G.B. Lucas, D. Harran, R.W. Pero, and R.G. Owens: Analysis of tobacco and smoke condensate for penicillic acid; Appl. Microbiol. 24 (1972) 34–36. Song, B.H. and D.L. Davis: Flavor related ionone derivatives from burley tobacco; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 22, 1977, p. 12. Song, B.H., D.L. Davis, and C.M. Song: Dehydration of flavor related ionols; 32nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 32, Paper No. 29, 1978, p. 15. Späth, E. and F. Kuffner: Die Tabakalkaloide [Tobacco alkaloids]; Forschr. Chem. Org. Naturstoffe 2 (1939) 248–300.
1411
3762 Späth, E., A. Wenusch, and E. Zajic: Tabak-Basen V. Die Konstitution des Myosmins [Tobacco bases. V. The constitution of myosmine]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 69 (1936) 393–396. 3763. Späth, E. and E. Zajic: Über neue Tabakalkaloide. VIII. Über Tabakbasen und Bermerkungen zur Kenntnis des Rhöadins, des L-Peganins und des Ammoresinols [On new tobacco alkaloids. VIII. On tobacco bases and observation on the presence of rhoeadins, L-peganins and ammoresinols]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 69B (1936) 2448–2452. 3764. Spears, A.W.: Quantitative determination of phenol in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 35 (1963) 320–322. 3765. Spears, A.W.: Selective filtration of volatile phenolic compounds from cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 76–80. 3766. Spears, A.W.: Effect of manufacturing variables on cigarette smoke composition; CORESTA 1974 Symp., CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1974: 65–78. 3767. Spears, A.W., J.H. Bell, and A.O. Saunders: The contribution of tobacco constituents to phenol yield of cigarettes; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 19. 1965, pp. 29–31. 3767a. Spears, A.W. and S.T. Jones: Chemical and physical criteria for tobacco leaf of modern day cigarettes; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 7 (1981) 19–39. 3768. Spears, A.W., C.W. Lassiter, and J.W. Bell: The determination of saturated hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 20, 1962, p. 13; Quantitative determination of alkanes in cigarette smoke; J. Gas Chromatog. 1 (1963) 34–37. 3769. Spears, A.W. and W.E. Routh: A combined approach to the quantitative analysis of the volatile components of cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 30, 1964, pp. 47–49. 3770. Specht, W. and M. Tillkes: Gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Rückständen an Pflanzenbehandlungsmitteln nach Clean-up über Gelchromatographie und Mini-Kiesel-gel-Säulenchromatographie: 1. OrganochlorPflanzenbehandlungsmittel in Tabak und Tabakerzeugnissen [Gas chromatographic determination of pesticide residues in plant material after clean-up by gel chromatography and mini-silica gel column chromatography. 1. Organochlorine pesticides in tobacco and tobacco products]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1979) 73–79. 3770a. Speer, B.R.: Photosynthetic pigments; in: UCMP Glossary (online), see http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/ glossary/gloss3/pigments.html, 1997 University of California, Berkeley Museum of Paleontology. 3771. Spence, J.B. and M.J. Lyons: Reducing substances in cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 36 (1958) 408. 3772. Spencer, R. and T.J. Weston: A-Amylase activity in tobacco leaf during and after curing; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 94a-99. 3772a. Sperisen, C., J. Ryals, and F. Meins: Comparison of cloned genes provides evidence for intergenomic exchange of DNA in the evolution of a tobacco glucan endo-1,3-B-glucosidase gene family; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88 (1991) 1820–1824.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1411
11/24/08 2:40:00 PM
1412
3773. Spiegelhalder, B., S. Fischer, and R. Preussmann: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in mainstream smoke of West German cigarettes: Influence of tar and tobacco type; in: Tobacco and cancer. Perspectives in preventive research, edited by A.P. Maskens, R. Molimard, R. Preussmann, and J.W. Wilmer, Excerpta Medica (1989) 23–34. 3774. Spiegelhalder, B., S.J. Kubacki, and S. Fischer: A method for the determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNA), nitrate and nitrite in tobacco leaves and processed tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1989) 135–144. 3775. Spincer, D.: The estimation of some metals in tobacco and cigarette smoke; 30th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 30, Paper No. 32, 1976, p. 25. 3776. Spincer, D. and B.C. Chard: The determination of formaldehyde in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 74–78. 3777. Spincer, D. and D.T. Westcott: Formation of nitrosodimethylamine in smoke from cigarettes manufactured from different tobacco types; in: Environmental N-nitroso compounds: Analysis and formation, edited by E.A. Walker, P. Bogovski, and L. Griciute, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 14 (1976) 133–139. 3778. Springer, J.P., J. Clardy, R.H. Cox, H.G. Cutler, and R.J. Cole: The structure of a new type of plant growth inhibitor extracted from immature tobacco leaves; Tetrahedron Lett. (1975) 2737–2740. 3779 Spurr, H.W. Jr, J.F. Chaplin, N. Einolf, E. Trusdell, and H.R. Randolph: Determination of neophytadiene by gas chromatography of an isopropyl extract of TPM; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 35, 1975, p. 26. 3779a. Squire, K.R. and B.E. Waymack: Thermal decomposition of pectin; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 47, 1981, p. 25. 3779b. Srikrishna, A. and S.S.V. Ramsastry: Enantiospecific total synthesis of (+)-2B-hydroxysolanascone, the aglycone of the photoalexin isolated from flue-cured tobacco leaves; Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 335–339. 3780. Srivastava, R.P. and K. Jha: Changes in free amino acids during air-curing of Dixie shade wrapper tobacco; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 11, 1989, p. 19; Tob. Sci. 35 (1991) 20–21. 3781. Stabbert R, K.-H. Schaefer, C. Biefel, and K. Rustemeier: Analysis of aromatic amines in cigarette [smoke]; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 84, 2001, p. 69. 3782. Staberg, E.: Tar and nicotine content of cigarette smoke; Nord. Hyg. Tidskr. 40 (1959) 71–88. 3783. Staberg, E.: Content of tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke. Comparison between different cigarette brands and studies of the effect of duration and mode of smoking; Nord. Hyg. Tidskr. 41 (1960) 199–216. 3784. Stähli, M.: Research on tobacco smoke; Thesis, Eidgenossichen Technischen Hochschule, Zurich, Switzerland, Publ. No. 757 (1933) pp. 1–53. 3785. Stahly, E.E.: Some considerations of metal carbonyls in tobacco smoke; Chem. Ind. (London) (1973) 620–623.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3786. Stahly, E.E. and E.W. Lard: Further considerations of metal carbonyls in tobacco smoke; Chem. Ind. (London) (1977) 85–86. 3787. Stamey, T.W. Jr and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Fluorometric determination of polynuclear hydrocarbons; RDR, 1965, No. 45, October 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966272 -6303. 3788. Stamey, T.W. Jr, R.B. Hege Jr, F.A. Thacker Jr, and J.T. Dobbins Jr: Fluorometric method for determination of polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1971, No. 12, May 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501002076 -2104. 3789. Stamey, T.W. Jr, R.B. Hege Jr, F.A. Thacker Jr, and J.T. Dobbins Jr: A rapid thin-layer method for fluorometric determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1971, No. 20, September 16, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501002299 -2331. 3789a. Stanfill, S.B. and D.L. Ashley: Quantitation of flavorrelated alkenylbenzenes in tobacco smoke particulate by selected ion monitoring gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; J Agr. Food Chem. 48 (2000) 1298–1306. 3789b. Starr, T.B. and J.E. Gibson: The mechanistic toxicology of formaldehyde and its implications for quantitative risk estimation; Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 25 (1985) 745–767. 3790. Staub, M. and H. Furrer: The determination of nicotine and tar in tobacco smoke; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. 44 (1953) 371–377; The testing of nicotine filters; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. 44 912953) 472–474. 3791. Stauffer, H.P. and J. Bourquin: The determination of formaldehyde in whole cigarette smoke; CORESTA Bull. (1971) 73–74; Eine spektralphotometrische Methode zur Bestimmung von Formaldehyd im Vollrauch von Cigaretten [A spectrophotometric method for the determination of formaldehyde in whole cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 21–26. 3792. Steck, W. and S.H. Wender: Chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acids in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 54–55. 3793. Steck, W., C.H. Yang, and S.H. Wender: Identification of salicylic and isovanillic acids in cigarette smoke; Chem. Ind. (1965) 560–561. 3794. Stedman, R.L.: Polyphenolic constituents of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 155–160. 3795. Stedman, R.L.: Aroma, flavor and chemical composition of cigarette tobacco and smoke; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1963(4) 11–23. 3796. Stedman, R.L: Nicotine reduction in tobacco smoke; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 113–119. 3797. Stedman, R.L: The chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke; Chem. Rev. 68 (1968) 153–207. 3798. Stedman, R.L., R.C. Benedict, M. Dymicky, and D.G. Bailey: Composition studies on tobacco. XXXVIII. Evidence for the origin of the high molecular weight, acidic pigment in cigarette smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 97–103. 3799. Stedman, R.L., D. Burdick, W.J. Chamberlain, and I. Schmeltz: Composition studies on tobacco. XVIII. Steam-volatile acids in smoke of cigarettes having different organoleptic properties; Tob. Sci. 8 (1964) 79–81. 3800. Stedman, R.L., D. Burdick, and I. Schmeltz: Composition studies on tobacco. XVII. Steam-volatile acidic fraction of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 166–169.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1412
11/24/08 2:40:00 PM
Bibliography
3801. Stedman, R.L., W.J. Chamberlain, and R.L. Miller: High molecular weight pigment in cigarette smoke; Chem. Ind. (1966) 1560–1562. 3802. Stedman, R.L. and M. Dymicky: Composition studies on tobacco. VI. Phthalates from flue-cured leaves; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 57–59. 3803. Stedman, R.L., L. Lakritz, and E.D. Strange: Composition studies on tobacco. XXXIII. Changes in smoke composition and filtration by artificial alteration of smoke pH; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 13–17. 3804. Stedman, R.L. and R.L. Miller: The alkylating activity of cigarette smoke; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1019–1024. 3805. Stedman, R.L., R.L. Miller, L. Lakritz, and W.J. Chamberlain: Method for concentrating polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; Chem. Ind. (1968) 394–395. 3806. Stedman, R.L. and W. Rusaniwskyj: Anomalous chromatographic behavior of chlorogenic acid in extracts of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 51–52. 3807. Stedman, R.L. and W. Rusaniwskyj: Composition studies on tobacco. VIII. Total paraffinic hydrocarbons in aged and fermented tobaccos; Tob. Sci. 3 (1959) 167–171. 3808. Stedman, R.L. and W. Rusaniwskyj: Composition studies on tobacco. X. Total paraffins and total sterols in relation to burley grades; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 17–18. 3809. Stedman, R.L. and C.D. Stills: The flavor contribution of Turkish tobacco in blended cigarettes: A study of the effect of added isovaleric and B-methylvaleric acids on the flavor of smokes from blended cigarettes that did not contain Turkish tobacco; USDA Res. Serv. Rpt., ARS 73–43, Philadelphia, PA (May 1964) pp. 1–8. 3810. Stedman, R.L., A.P. Swain, and W. Rusaniwskyj: Isomerization of terpenoid hydrocarbons by acidwashed alumina; J. Chromat. 4 (1960) 252–253. 3811. Stedman, R.L., A.P. Swain, and W. Rusaniwskyj: Composition studies on tobacco. XII. Total hexane extractives; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 1–3. 3811a. Steffens, G.L.: Influence of growth regulators and herbicides on the chemistry of tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 5 (1979) 133–163. 3812. Stehlik, G., G. Richter, and H. Altmann: Concentration of dimethylnitrosamine in the air of smoke-filled rooms; Ecotoxicol. Environmental Safety 6 (1982), 495–500. 3813. Stein, Y.S. and M.J. Antal Jr: A study of the gas-phase pyrolysis of glycerol; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol, 4 (1983) 283–296. 3814. Steiner, P.E. and H.L. Falk: Summation and inhibition effects of weak and strong carcinogenic hydrocarbons, 1:2-benzanthracene, chrysene, 1:2:5:6-dibenzanthracene, and 20-methylcholanthrene; Cancer Res. 11 (1951) 56–63. 3815. Stenhagen, E.: On the chemistry of tobacco smoke; Acta Soc. Med. Upsalensis 64 (1959) 322. 3816. Stepanov, I., S.G. Carmella, S.S. Hecht, and G. Duca: Analysis of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in Moldovan cigarette tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 50 (2002) 2793–2797. 3817. Stephens, R.L., P.L. Houser, and J.A. Weybrew: The quantitative estimation of carbonyls in tobacco; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 26, 1960, pp. 13–14.
1413
3817a. Sterling, D.C.: Determination of sulfur compounds in the vapor phase of cigarette smoke; RDM, 1979, No. 7, May 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500608229 -8244. 3818. Stevenson, C., I.G. Gilman, P. Rainey, and R. Bereman: Investigations into different techniques for the determination of nitric oxide in mainstream cigarette smoke using chemiluminescence; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 10, 2002, pp. 24–25. 3819. Stewart, J.L.: Analysis of moisture content of whole cigarettes by nondestructive nuclear magnetic resonance; R&DM, 1983, No. 23, June 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509525381 -5382. 3819a. Stewart, W.W.: Isolation and proof of structure of Wildfire toxin; Nature 229 (1971) 174–178. 3820. Stowe, M.E. and J.L. Harris: A rapid gas chromatographic analysis for fluoranthene and pyrene found in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1970, No. 47, December 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500510348 -0353. 3821. Strach, L.: Quantitative comparison of carcinogenic substances in cigarette smoke, air pollution and automobile exhaust fumes in relation to cancer of the organs of respiration; Deut. Med. J. 17 (1966) 104–108. 3821a. Strycharz, S., M. Coleman, and L. Newman: Metabolic response of native southeastern trees to trichloroethylene; Norman J. Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; see www. uga.edu/srel/UMASSArab.pdf. 3822. Sugawara S, Ishizu I, and U. Kobashi: Studies on casing effects on cigarettes. I. Change in chemical composition with casing additives; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 105 (1963) 203–207. 3823. Sugawara S, U. Kobashi, and Y. Kaburaki Determination of polybasic acids in tobacco leaves by methanol-sulfuric acid method; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 114 (1972) 61–67. 3824. Sugawara, S., U. Kobashi, and H. Sakurai: Studies on the chemical evaluation of tobacco quality. II. Organoleptic and gas chromatographic evaluation of the differences with respect to the growth district and stalk position of flue-cured tobacco; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 112 (1970) 143–148. 3825. Sugawara, S., U. Kobashi, and H. Sakurai: Studies on the chemical evaluation of tobacco quality. I. Possibility for the evaluation of tobacco quality from chemical composition in particulate phase of the cigarette smoke; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 35 (1971) 596–603. 3826. Sugawara, S., U. Kobashi, and H. Sakurai: Studies on the chemical evaluation of tobacco quality. III. Evaluation of tobacco quality from gas chromatographic analysis of particulate phase of the cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 95–97. 3827. Sugawara, S., S. Matsushima, and S. Ishiguro: Comparison of main components in cigarette smoke from various types of tobacco; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: S11, 119. 3828. Sugawara, S., H. Sakuma, S. Ishiguro, and M. Kusama: Gas chromatographic analysis of tobacco smoke by trimethylsilylation method; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 179–180. 3828a. Sugimura, T.: Isolation and structure determination of mutagenic substances in L-glutamic acid pyrolysis; Proc. Japan Acad. 54 (Series B) (1978) 248–250.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1413
11/24/08 2:40:00 PM
1414
3828b. Sugimura, T.: Mutagenic factors in cooked food; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 6 (1979) 182–209. 3828c. Sugimura, T.: Past, present, and future of mutagens in cooked foods; Environmental Hlth. Perspect. 67 (1986) 5–10. 3828d. Sugimura T: Naturally occurring genotoxic carcinogens; in: Naturally occurring carcinogens-mutagens and modulators of carcinogenesis, edited by E.C. Miller, J.A. Miller, I. Hirono, T. Sugimura, and S. Takayama, Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, Japan (1979) 241–262, see 256. 3828e. Sugimura, T: Mutagens, carcinogens, and tumor promoters in our daily food; Cancer 49 (1982) 1970–1984. 3828f. Sugimura, T.: Carcinogenicity of mutagenic heterocyclic amines formed during cooking process; Mutation Res. 150 (1985) 33–41. 3829. Sugimura, T., T. Kawachi, M. Nagao, T. Yohagi, Y. Seino, T. Okamoto, K. Shudo, T. Kosuge, K. Tsuji, K. Watabayashi, Y. Iitaka, and A. Ita: Mutagenic principle(s) in tryptophan and phenylalanine pyrolysis products; Proc. Japan Acad. 53B (1977) 58–61. 3829a. Sugimura, T., M. Nagao, T. Kawachi, M. Honda, T. Yohagi, Y. Seino, S. Sato, N. Matsukura, T. Matsushima, A. Shitai, M. Sawamura, and H. Matsumoto: Mutagencarcinogens in food, with special reference to highly mutagenic pyrolytic products in broiled foods; in: Origins of human cancer, edited by H.H. Hiatt, J.D. Watson, and J.A. Winsten, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1977) 1561–1577. 3829b. Sugimura, T. and M. Nagao: Mutagenic factors in cooked foods; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 6 (1979) 189–209. 3830. Sula, J.P.: Exogenous carcinogens in the human organism; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 15 (1959) 688–691. 3831. Sula, J.P.: The carcinogen 3,4-benzpyrene in the living environment and human organism; Neoplasma 10 (1963) 571–579. 3832. Sullivan, B.N. Jr: Total bases in the smoke of competitive brand cigarettes: Summary for 1964; RDM, 1965, No. 30, April 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500602647 -2649. 3833. Sullivan, B.N. Jr and T.G. Harrell: Determination of total bases in cigarette smoke; RDR, 1956, No. 2, February 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500930012 -0036. 3834. Sullivan, B.N. Jr and T.G. Harrell: Arsenic content of tobacco; RDM, 1956, No. 25, September 14, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500610468 -0468; RDM, 1957, No. 10, May 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610608 -0608. 3835. Summers, V.W.: Rapid gas chromatographic determination of glycerin, propylene glycol, triethylene glycol, and triacetin in cigarette smoke; R&DM, 1986, No. 172, November 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508615295 -5310, 505456272 -6286. 3836. Sunderman, F.W. Jr.: Cancer-causing chemical changes acid; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 181(13) (1962) 33. 3836a. Sunderman, F.W., K.S. McCully, S.B. Taubman, P.R. Allpass, M.C. Reid, and L.A. Rinehimer: Manganese inhibition of sarcoma induction by benzo[a]pyrene in rats; Carcinogenesis 1 (1980) 613–620. 3837. Sunderman, F.W. and F.W. Sunderman Jr: Implication of nickel as a possible carcinogen in cigarettes; Joint Ann. Mtg. Am. Soc. Clin. Path. & College Am. Path., Chicago, IL (1960); Nickel poisoning. XI. Implication of nickel as a pulmonary carcinogen in tobacco smoke; Am. J. Clin. Path. 35 (1961) 203–209.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3838. Sunderman, F.W. Jr and F.W. Sunderman: Studies of nickel carcinogenesis: Subcellular partition of nickel in lungs and liver following inhalation of nickel carbonyl; Am. J. Clin. Path. 40 (1963) 563–575. 3839. Swain, A.P., J.E. Cooper, and R.L. Stedman: Largescale fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate for chemical and biological investigations; 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 16, 1968, p. 10; Cancer Res. 29 (1969) 579–583. 3840. Swain, A.P., J.E. Cooper, R.L. Stedman, and F.G. Bock: Composition studies on tobacco. XL. Large scale fractionation of the neutrals of cigarette smoke condensate using adsorption chromatography and solvent partitioning; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 14, 1969, p. 9; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1969) 109–114. 3841. Swain, A.P., R.F. Peterson Jr, and R.L. Stedman: Composition studies on tobacco. XXI. The head-space vapors of leaf; J. Agr. Food Chem. 17 (1966) 349–353. 3842. Swain, A.P. and R.L. Stedman: Higher fatty acids of various tobacco types and grades; 15th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 15, Paper No. 2, 1961, p. 3. 3843. Swartz, H.: Tobacco smoke: A noxious air pollutant. A review and comment. Part II; Rev. Allergy 25 (1971) 490–505. 3844. Swauger, J.E., M.J. Morton, C.A. Rahn, B.B. Collie, E.A. Bombick, J.T. Avalos, M.F. Borgerding, and D.C. Rees: A comparison of the mainstream cigarette smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with Kentucky Reference Cigarettes K1R4F and K1R5F; The Toxicologist 36(1) Part 2 (1997) 152 Abstract 774. Presented at the Society of Toxicology Annual Meeting (March 1997); Food Chem. Toxicol. 38 (2000) 949–962. 3844a. Synthase: By a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term synthase anthranilate tobacco, synthase malate tobacco, etc. provides a comprehensive list of references to the specified enzyme in tobacco. 3844b. Synthetase: by a search (Google) on the Internet, inserting the term synthetase indoleacetate tobacco, synthetase adenosine triphosphate tobacco, etc. provides a comprehensive list of references to the specified enzyme in tobacco. 3845. Szadkowski, D., H.P. Harke, and T. Anderer: Kohlenmonoxidbelastung durch Passivrauchen in BüroRaumen [Carbon monoxide burden from passive smoking in offices]; Innere Med. 3 (1976) 310–313. 3846. Szadkowski, D., H. Schultze, K.H. Schaller, and G. Lehnert: Zur ökologischen Bedeuting der Schwermetallgehaltes von Zigaretten. Blei-, Cadmium-, und Nickelanalysen des Tabaks sowie der Gas- und Partikelphase [The oncological significance of the heavy metal content of cigarettes. Lead, cadmium, and nickel analysis of tobacco as well as of its vapor and particulate phases]; Arch. Hyg. 153 (1969) 1–8. 3847. Szent-Gyorgyi, A.: Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from cigarette mainstream smoke by chloranil; Personal communication in 1960 to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, see Rodgman, A. and L.C. Cook: The analysis of cigarette smoke condensate. XVII. Chloranil and 2,4,7-trintrofluorenone as filter-tip additives; RDR, 1960, No. 38, December 7, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501008695 -8704.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1414
11/24/08 2:40:00 PM
Bibliography
3848. Tada. O.: Determination of nitrogen oxides in the air; Rept. Inst. Sci. Labour 60 (1963) 7–26. 3849. Taft, P.F.: Determination of cation and anion concentrations in tobacco and cigarette smoke; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 32, 1965, pp. 47–49. 3850. Tafur, S., M. Core, R. Hale, R. Bassfield, and N. Einolf: Preparative chromatographic techniques for the isolation of tobacco glucosides; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 7, 1994, p. 27. 3851. Takagi, J., T. Chuman, T. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, T. Fukuzumi, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of new norisoprenoids related to tobacco thunberganoids from Japanese Domestic Suifu tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 327. 3852. Takagi, J., T. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, T. Fukuzumi, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of a new tobacco constituent, (3S,5R,6S,9E)-3-hydroxy-5,6-epoxy-B-ionol, from Japanese domestic Suifu tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 42 (1978) 1785–1787. 3853. Takagi, J., T. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, and K. Kato: Cembrene, from Japanese domestic tobacco, N. tabacum cv. Suifi; Agr. Biol. Chem. 44 (1980) 467–468. 3854. Takahara, H., T. Chuman, and T. Fukuzumi: Sulfur compounds and N-alkylpyrroles in tobacco smoke; J. Agr. Chem. Japan 47 (1973) 391–395. 3855. Takahara, H., T. Shinkai, H. Inumaru, and I. Morishita: Studies on tobacco extract. III. Chemical components in fractions A and B from tobacco dust and cyclone tobacco dust (trichomes); Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 109 (1967) 93–97. 3856. Takahara, H., T. Shinkai, H. Inumaru, and I. Morishita: Studies on tobacco extract. IV. Chemical components in fractions A and B obtained from various tobacco leaves; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 110 (1968) 67–75. 3857. Takahara, H., T. Shinkai, H. Inumaru, and I. Morishita: Studies on tobacco extract. V. Chemical components of different stalk positions (one position), grade, and growing district in fractions A and B of the bright yellow variety; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 110 (1968) 77–82. 3858. Takahara, H., H. Tanuma, T. Shinkai, K. Kumagai, and I. Morishita: Studies on tobacco extract. VII. On the chemical components of Virginian flue-cured tobacco leaves (11 PXS); Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 113 (1971) 71–75. 3859. Takahashi H, Y. Sone, M. Matsukura, and T. Sakaki: Quantitative changes of cigarette smoke components during a puff; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 19, 1993, pp. 29–30. 3860. Takahashi, K., A. Yamazaki, M. Otawa, and K. Nishida: Studies on storage and aging of leaf tobacco. 1. Effects of vacuum dehydration on smoking quality, physical property and chemical composition of tobacco; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 69–73. 3861. Takanami, Y., M. Chida, H. Hasebe, Y. Sone, and S. Suhara: New system for the analysis of mainstream smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 86, 2001, p. 70.
1415
3861a. Takanami, Y. and S. Suhara: Quantitative analysis of aromatic amines in mainstream cigarette smoke with solid-phase extraction; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 67, 2005, pp. 55–56. 3862. Takanami, Y., H. Takahashi, and M. Shibagaki: Studies on free radicals formation in vapor phase cigarette smoke; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 74, 2002, pp. 65–66. 3862a. Takase, S. and H. Murakami: Studies on the fluorescence of sake. I. Fluorescent spectrum of sake and identification of harman; Agr. Biol. Chem. 30 (1966) 869. 3862b. Takayama, S., M. Masuda, M. Mogami, H. Ohgaki, S. Sato, and T. Sugimura: Induction of cancers in the intestine, liver and various other organs of rats by feeding mutagens from glutamic acid pyrolysate; Gann 75 (1984) 207–213. 3862c. Takayama, S., Y. Nakatsuru, M. Masuda, H. Ohgaki, S. Sato, and T. Sugimura: Demonstration of carcinogenicity in F344 rats of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline from broiled sardine, fried beef and beef extract; Gann 75 (1984) 467–470. 3862d. Takayama, S., Y. Nakatsuru, H. Ohgaki, S. Sato, and T. Sugimura: Carcinogenicity in rats of a mutagenic compound, 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole, from tryptophan pyrolysate; Gann 76 (1985) 815–817. 3863. Takayama, S. and K. Oota: Chemical analysis of cigarette tar produced by human smoking; Gann 51 (1960) 97–103. 3863a. Takeda, K., K. Shudo, T. Okamoto, and T. Kosuge: Synthesis of mutagenic principles: Acids isolated from L-glutamic acid pyrolysate; Chem. Pharm. Bull. 26 (1978) 2924–2925. 3863b. Takeda, S., F. Sato, K. Ida, and Y. Yamada: Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA for osmotin-like protein from cultured tobacco cells; Plant Physiol. 97 (1991) 844–846. 3864. Takeshita, T. and H. Ohe: Ageing of cigarette smoke and its relation to radical concentration; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 163–167. 3865. Taki, S.: The carcinogenic activity of substances isolated from tobacco tar; Osaka Daigaku Igaku Zassi 36 (1937) 483–484. Cited by Kinosita, R.: Studies on carcinogenic chemical substances; Trans. Soc. Path. Japan 27 (1937) 665–727. 3865a. Takizawa, N.: Carcinogenic action of certain quinones; Gann 34 (1940) 1–5, 158–160, Proc. Imp. Acad. Japan 16 (1940) 309–312, Gann 35 (1941) 327–330. 3865b. Talhout, R., A. Opperhuizen, and J.G. van Amsterdam: Sugars as tobacco ingredient: Effects on mainstream smoke composition; Food Chem. Toxicol. 44 (2006) 1789–1798. 3865c. Tanaka, T., W.S. Barnes, G.M. Williams, and J.H. Weisburger: Multipotential carcinogenicity of the fried food mutagen 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) in rats; Gann 76 (1985) 570–576. 3866. Tancogne, J.: Presence of ergosta-4,6,8(14),22-tetraen3-one and ergosterol in mold-infested tobacco; Ann. Tabac 14 (1977) 197–204. 3867. Tancogne, J. and J. Chouteau: Les phytosterols du tabac [The phytosterols of tobacco]; SEITA 1976(13) 79–89. 3868. Tang, H., G. Richards, C.L. Benner, J.P. Tuominen, M.L. Lee, E.A. Lewis, L.D. Hansen, and D.J. Eatough:
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1415
11/24/08 2:40:01 PM
1416
3869.
3870.
3870a.
3871.
3872.
3873
3874.
3874a.
3874b.
3874c.
3875.
3876.
3877.
3878.
3879.
3880.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Solanesol: A tracer for environmental tobacco smoke particles; Environ. Sci. Technol. 24 (1990) 848–852. Tanguy, J.M., F. Cabanne, E. Perdrizet, and C. Martin: The distribution of hydroxycinnamic acid amides in flowering plants; Phytochemistry 17 (1978) 1927–1928. Tani, T.: Untersuchungen über die Bestimmung von Kohlenmonoxid im Tabakrauch und seine Bedeutung für die Gesundheit [Investigations on the determination of carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke and its health significance]; Thesis, Würzburg University (1907) pp. 1–25. Tarora, M., K. Katayama, and T. Hasegawa: Filtration behavior of formaldehyde in mainstream smoke using two types of cigarette filters; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 79, 2005, p. 62. Tarora, W., K. Torikai, and H. Takahashi: Studies on the generation of carbonyl compounds in tobacco smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 57, 2003, p. 54. Taylor, M.J. and J.F. Graham: Simultaneous quantitative determination of formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide in cigarette smoke using a simple solid trapping system; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: Paper ST09, 104–105. Teague, C.E. Jr: Furfural from tobacco stems; RDM, 1954, No. 15, May 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610042 -0046. Tebbens, B.D., J.F. Thomas, and M. Mukai: Aromatic hydrocarbon production related to incomplete combustion. Arch. Ind. Hlth. 14 (1956) 413–425. Tebbutt, S.J. and D.M. Lonsdale: Identification of a defective transposable element in tobacco; Plant Mol. Biol. 23 (1993) 397–400. Tebbutt, S.J., H.J. Rogers and D.M. Lonsdale: Characterization of a tobacco gene encoding a pollenspecific polygalacturonase; Plant Mol. Biol. 25 (1994) 283–297. Technology Linked Business Opportunity Publications: Nicotine and its Derivatives from Tobacco Waste Publication TSM 158 (2000), see www.tifac.org.in/ offer/tlbo/rep/st158.htm. Tendille, G., C. Gervai, and T. Gaborit: Variations in the amounts of quinone compounds and of tocopherol in various chlorophyll-containing plant tissues under the influence of factors affecting the chlorophyll content; Ann. Physiol. Veg. 8 (1966) 270–283. Tennessee Eastman Corporation: Composition of tobacco smoke; Tennessee Eastman Corp. Res. Rpt. No. 4–1201–1 (August 21, 1956). Tennessee Eastman Corporation: Composition of tobacco smoke. II. Composition of tobacco extract and its pyrolysis products; Tennessee Eastman Corp. Res. Rpt. No. 4–1201–2 (April 13, 1959). Tennessee Eastman Corporation: Composition of tobacco smoke. III. Effects of the extraction of tobacco on amount of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke tar; Tennessee Eastman Corp. Res. Rpt. No. 4–1201–3 (July 14, 1959). Tennessee Eastman Corporation: Quantitative determination of catechol in cigarette smoke (M.S. Baggett and G.P. Morie), Publication No. FTR-36, see www.rjrtdocs. com 503876955 -6960. Terrell, J.H. and I. Schmeltz: The effect of chemical additives in cigarette tobacco on the composition of
3881.
3882.
3883.
3884.
3885.
3886.
3887.
3888.
3889.
3890.
3891.
3892.
3893.
3894.
3895.
the mainstream smoke gas; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 26, 1969, p. 19. Terrell, J.H. and I. Schmeltz: The effect of the design of cigarettes on the composition of the mainstream smoke gas; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 27, 1969, p. 20. Terrell, J.H. and I. Schmeltz: Alteration of cigarette smoke composition. I. Influence of certain additives; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 78–81. Terrell, J.H. and I. Schmeltz: Alteration of cigarette smoke composition. II. Influence of cigarette design; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 82–85. Testa, A.: The automatic determination of alkaloids and phenols in cigarette smoke; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 8(Sect. 1) (1970) 209. Testa, A. and C. Joigny: Gas liquid chromatography of acrolein and other A,B-unsaturated compounds from the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 10(Sect. 1) (1972) 67–81. Testa, A. and P. Testa: Nitrogenous heterocyclic compounds in cigaret smoke condensate; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 2(Sect. 1) (1964) 163–191. Testa, A. and P. Testa: Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds in tobacco smoke condensate. I. Lower members: Pyrrole, indole, skatole, carbazole, pyrocoll; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1964(2) 7–10. Testa, A. and P. Testa: Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds in tobacco smoke condensate. II. Pyrazines, azaindole, azacarbazole, and diazole compounds; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 3(Sect. 1) (1965) 103–108. Testa, A., P. Testa, and J.L. Cuzin: A rapid analytical technique for routine determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke condensate; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 19, 1963, p. 15. Testa, A., P. Testa, and J.L. Cuzin: Observations on the specific retention of certain chemical constituents in the condensate (phenols, polyphenols, heterocyclic nitrogen compounds); CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964). Testa, A., P. Testa, and J.L. Cuzin: Improved method for the determination of hydroquinone, pyrocatechol, and scopoletin in cigarette smoke condensates, involving the use of smoke quantities as small as one puff, including analytical data on various tobacco types and the effect of various cellulose acetate filters; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 3(Sect. 1) (1965) 87–101. Testa, P.M. and L.S. Hys: The neutral-carbonyl fraction of cigarette smoke condensate. Identification of the principal components; Anal. Tabac: Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 14(Sect. 1) (1976) 45–49. Thacker, F.A. Jr: Essential oil study: Sir Walter Raleigh aromatic smoking tobacco; RDM, 1979, No. 16, May 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500608337 -8339. Thacker, F.A. Jr and J.M. Martin: Quantitative determination of piperonal, ethylvanillin, and vanillin in tobacco by gas-liquid chromatography and fluorometric thin-layer chromatography; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 49, 1973, p. 32, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503179926 -9942. Thacker F.A. Jr and T.W. Stamey: Fluorimetric determination of selenium in cigarette paper and tobacco;
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1416
11/24/08 2:40:01 PM
Bibliography
3896.
3896a.
3897.
3898.
3899.
3900.
3901.
3901a.
3902.
3903.
3903a.
3904.
RDR, 1970, No. 19, April 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501000333 -0352. Theodorovits, I.: The nicotine content of the smoke of different tobacco products; Magyar. Dohany. (Budapest) Ugust 1 (1905) 5; August 16: 2–3; September 1: 2–3; September 16: 2–3; October 1: 2–3. Theophilus, E. H., D.B. Poindexter, D.R. Meckley, B.R. Bombick, M.F. Borgerding, M.A. Higuchi, P.H. Ayres, M.J. Morton, A.T. Mosberg, and J.E. Swauger: Toxicological evaluation of dry ice expanded tobacco; Toxicol. Lett. 145 (2003) 107–119. Thomas, C.E. and K.B. Koller: Puff-by-puff mainstream smoke analysis by multiplex gas chromatographymass spectrometry; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 345–351. Thomas, H.: Kohlenmonoxid im Tabakrauch [Carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke]; Ber. Deut. Pharm. Gesellschaft. (1900) 19. Thomas, M.D. and T.R. Collier: Concentration of arsenic in tobacco smoke determined by rapid titrimetric method; J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 27 (1945) 201–206. Thome, F.A.: Gas chromatographic determination of water in cigarette mainstream smoke and total particulate matter; RDR, 1965, No. 18, April 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965747 -5761; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 33, 1965, p. 49; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 51–54. Thome, F.A.: Examination of the vapor phase of cigarette smoke using high resolution gas chromatography with electron capture and hydrogen flame detection; RDR, 1966, No. 11, April 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966968 -7016. Thome, F.A.: A qualitative examination of cigarette smoke from Freon 11®-expanded tobacco for phosgene; RDM, 1966, No. 70, November 14, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501539727 -9728; A qualitative examination of cigarette smoke from Freon 11®-expanded tobacco for phosgene; RDM, 1968, No. 22, April 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613961 -3962; Phosgene determination, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508333051 -3051, 502265187 -5187. Thome, F.A.: Identification of homologous series of A,B-diketones and A-ketoaldehydes in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography with electron capture detection; RDR, 1967, No. 14, April 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500967886 -7908. Thome, F.A.: Qualitative determination of methyl substituted pyridines added to smoking tobacco; RDM, 1970, No. 13, March 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614232 -4242. Thome, F.A.: Materials balance of Freon 11® residue on tobacco during smoking; RDM, 1970, No. 54, May 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500614598 -4603. Thome, F.A. and S.B. Sears: Investigation of the gasphase reaction of aliphatic aldehydes during negative ion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization; R&DM, 1986, No 112, August 1, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505448301 -8343; Investigations of gas phase reactions of aliphatic aldehydes during negative ion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 63, 1986, p. 34.
1417
3905. Thome, F.A., G.W. Young, and C.R. Green: GC/MS Methods: Closed loop headspace analysis; RDM, 1976, No. 32, September 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607232 -7241. 3906. Thome, F.A., G.W. Young, and W.C. Hamlin Jr: Pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometric studies of tobacco varieties and their blends; R&DM, 1981, No. 14, April 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509101438 -1438; Applications of pyrolysis-gas chromatographymass spectrometry to tobacco chemistry; CORESTA 1982 Symp., Winston-Salem, NC, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper S12, 22–23. 3907. Thompson, B.T. and B. Mizaikoff: Time resolved FT-IR spectroscopy applied to gas phase analysis of sidestream cigarette smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 75, 2003, p. 66. 3908. Thompson, J.I. and Company: Survey of compounds which have been tested for carcinogenic activity; USPHS Publ. No. 149, Washington, DC (1968/1969 Volume); USPHS Publ. No. 149, Washington, DC (1970/1971 Volume). 3909. Thoms, H.: Chemiche Untersuchungen des Tabakrauches [The chemical examination of tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 23 (1899) 852–854. 3910. Thoms, H.: Über die Rauchprodukte des Tabaks [The smoke products of tobacco]; Ber. Deut. Pharm. Gesellschaft. 10 (1900) 19–31. 3911. Thoms, H.: Der Blausäuregehalt des Zigarrenrauches [The hydrogen cyanide content of cigar smoke]; Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 37 (1903) 250. 3912. Thoms, H.: Versuche zur Entgiftung des Tabakrauches [Study of the detoxification of tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 28 (1904) 1–3. 3912a. Thornburg, R.W., A. Kernan, and L. Molin: Chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) protein is expressed in transgenic tobacco in field tests following attack by insects; Plant Physiol. 92 (1990) 500–505. 3913. Thornton, R.E. and S.R. Massey: Some effects of adding sugar to tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 11–15. 3914. Thorpe, T.E. and J. Holmes: The occurrence of paraffins in the leaf of tobacco; J. Chem. Soc. 79 (1901) 982. 3915. Thorstenson, J.H. and H.W. Dorough: Chlorinated insecticide residues in the Universiity of Kentuck Reference and alkaloid series cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 22–25. 3916. Threlfall, D.R., W.T. Griffiths, and T.W. Goodwin: Isolation of two analogues of plastoquinone from senescent leaves of tobacco; Biochim. Biophys. Acta 102 (1965) 614–618. 3916a. Tiedemann, H: Does p-benzoquinone have a carcinogenic effect on local application? Z. Naturforsch. 8B (1953) 49–50. 3917. Tiemann, T., F. Seehofer, R. Schröder, and D. Hanssen: Analytical methods for cigars and cigarillos; Tabak Tech., Hamburg Tech. Wiss. Schriftenreihe 37 (1963) 1–6. 3917a. Tiggelbeck, D.: Comments on selective cigarette-smoke filtration: in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 249–258. 3918. Toet, L.: Distillation method for the determination of inorganic bromide in cured tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 139–143. 3919. Toet, M.J. and L. Toet: Determination of Chlorpyrifos (diethyl-3,5,6-trichloropyridylphosphorothioate) in cured tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 334–338.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1417
11/24/08 2:40:01 PM
1418
3920. Tojib, A., D.L. Davis, and P.D. Legg: Inheritance of phytosterol content in tobacco; Crop Sci. 17 (1977) 700–703. 3921. Tokura, C. amd Y. Furakawa: Nicotine and tar in cigarette smoke. Collection efficiency of the Cambridge filter for nicotine and tar; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 106 (1964) 289–293. 3922. Tombesi, L.: Ascorbic acid in tobacco; Il Tabacco 55 (1951) 15, 53; Lona, F. and F. Porzio-Giovanola: Ascorbic acid in tobacco; Nuova Giorna Bot. Ital. 58 (1951) 462, see Chem. Abstr. 47 (1953) 11365g. 3923. Tomita, H., M. Noguchi, and E. Tamaki: Chemical studies on ninhydrin-positive compounds in cured tobacco leaves. Part III. Further isolation and identification of some amino acid-sugar compounds; Agr. Biol. Chem. 29 (1965) 959–961. 3924. Tomita, H. and D. Yoshida: Pyrolytic formation of benzo[a]pyrene from various compounds; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 45, 1975, p. 31. 3925. Tonn, O.: Results of tests on denicotinizing tobacco by the “Nicoton” and “Bonicot” methods; Apotheker Ztg. 46 (1931) 1393–1395. 3926. Toole, E.: The polarimetric determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Z. Anal. Chem. 93 (1933) 188–194. 3927. Torrence, K., A.I. Yuzefosky, N. Xu, and R.L. McDaniel: Trace element analysis of mainstream smoke condensate collected by electrostatic precipitation; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 30, 1998, p. 29. 3927a. Toth, B. and K. Patil: Enhancing effect of vitamin E on murine intestinal tumorigenesis by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine hydrochloride; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 70 (1983) 1107–1111. 3928. Toth, H. and K. Dangelmajer: Denicotinization of tobacco smoke; Chem. Ztg. 40 (1916) 1013. 3929. Toth, J.: Contribution to the determination of carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke; Chem. Ztg. 31 (1907) 98–99; Rev. Internat. Falsifications 21 (1908) 8–11. 3930. Toth, J.: Über die Menge an freiem Nikotin im Tabakrauch [The free nicotine content of tobacco smoke]; Kiserletugyi Koslemenyek 11 (1908) 520–523; Chem. Ztg. 33 (1909) 866–867. 3931. Toth, J.: Thiocyanogen compounds in tobacco smoke; Chem. Ztg. 33 (1909) 1301. 3932. Toth, J.: Der Gehalt an Cyanverbindungen des Tabakrauchs [The content of cyanogen compounds in tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 34 (1910) 298–299; Die Cyanverbindungen des Tabakrauchs [The cyanogen compounds of tobacco smoke]; Der Gehalt an Cyanverbindungen des Tabakrauchs [The content of cyanogen compounds in tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 34 (1910) 1357; Chem. Ztg. 35 (1911) 1262. 3933. Toth, J.: Schwefelwasserstoff im Rauch ungarischer Tabake [Hydrogen sulfide in the smoke of Hungarian tobacco]; Chem. Ztg. 37 (1913) 897–898. 3934. Toth, J. and J. Krampera: Data on the amount of ammonia, pyridine bases, and nicotine in tobacco smoke; Kiserletugyi Koslemenyek 13 (1910) 617–622. 3935. Touey, G.P.: The gaseous phase of cigarette smoke. 1: Collection and analysis for total aldehydes; 8th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 8, Paper No. 22, 1954, p. 7; The gaseous phase of cigarette smoke. Isolation and analysis for total aldehydes; Anal. Chem. 27 (1957) 1788–1790; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 78–81.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3936. Touey, G.P.: Manufacture of filamentary tobacco smoke filter; United States Patent No. 2.956.329 (October 18, 1960). 3937. Touey, G.P. and J.E. Kiefer: Tobacco-smoke filter for removal of phenols; U.S. Patent No. 3,229,699 (January 18, 1966). 3938. Touey, G.P., J.E. Kiefer, and J.R. Caldwell: Tobacco smoke filter capable of selective removal of aldehydes; U.S. Patent No. 2,968,306 (January 17. 1961). 3939. Touey, G.P., R.C. Mumpower, J.E. Kiefer, and B.J. Sublett: Removal of organic vapors from cigarette smoke with cellulose acetate filters containing adsorbents; Paper presented in seminar to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Research Department personnel, Winston-Salem, NC (1963). 3940. Touey, G.P. and H.W. Patton: Gas chromatographic determination of some hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 17, 1955, p. 10. 3941. Townsend, D.E.: The effect of tobacco moisture on the removal of cigarette smoke by the tobacco rod; 37th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 37, Paper No. 31, 1983, p. 15; CORESTA Smoke Study Group Mtg., Florence, Italy (1983). 3941a. Townsend, D.E. (Editor): Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physical and Chemical Processes Occurring in a Burning Cigarette; R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, NC (1987). 3942. Townsend, D.E. and T. A. Perfetti: The transfer of nicotine to cigarette smoke; R&DM, 1982, No. 10, March 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509754086 -4114. 3942a. Toxline: Benzo[a]pyrene, Report, November 2, 1994, see www.pmdocs.com 2060534641/4719. 3942b. Traetta-Mosca, F.: Gli estratti di etere dei foglidel tobacco del Kentucky [The ether extracts of Kentucky tobacco leaves]; Gazz. Chim. Ital. 43 (1913) 440–445. 3943. Traube, L.: Über die Entfernung des aus dem Tabakrauch während des Rauchens [Removal of nicotine from tobacco smoke during smoking]; Chem Ztg. 56 (1932) 963. 3943a. Tricker, A.R.: N-Nitroso compounds and man: Sources of exposure, endogenous formation and occurrence in body fluids; European J. Cancer Prev. 6 (1997) 226–268. 3943b. Tricker, A.R.: Toxicology of tobacco-specific nitrosamines; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 27 (2001) 75–102. 3944. Tricker, A.R., C. Ditrich, and R. Preussmann: N-Nitroso compounds in cigarette tobacco and their occurrence in mainstream tobacco smoke; Carcinogenesis 12 (1991) 257–262. 3945. Tricker, A.R., R. Haubner, B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: The occurrence of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in oral tobacco products and their potential formation under simulated gastric conditions; Food Chem. Toxicol. 26 (1988) 861–865. 3946. Tricker, A.R. and R. Preussmann: N-Nitroso compounds and their precursors in the human environment; in: Nitrosamines: Toxicology and microbiology, edited by J.M. Hill, VCH Publishers Inc., New York, NY (1988) 88–116. 3947. Tricker, A.R. and R. Preussmann: The occurrence of N-nitroso compounds in Zarda tobacco; Cancer Lett. 42 (1988) 113–118. 3948. Tricker, A.R. and R. Preussmann: The occurrence of N-nitroso compounds in Kiwam tobacco; Cancer Lett. 49 (1989) 221–224. 3949. Tricker, A.R. and R. Preussmann: Preformed nitrosamines in smokeless tobacco; in: Tobacco and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1418
11/24/08 2:40:01 PM
Bibliography
3950.
3951.
3952.
3953.
3954.
3955.
3956.
3957.
3958.
3959. 3960.
3961.
3962.
3963.
3964.
cancer. Perspectives in preventive research, edited by A.P. Maskens, R. Molimard, R. Preussmann, and J.W. Wilmer, Excerpta Medica (1989) 35–47. Tricker, A.R. and R. Preussmann: Exposure to nicotine derived N-nitrosamines from smokeless tobacco and evidence against their endogenous formation; in: Effects of nicotine on biological systems, edited by F. Adlkofer and K. Thurau, Birkhauser Verlag, Boston, MA (1991) 109–113. Tricker, A.R. and R. Preussmann: Volatile N-nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke: Occurrence and formation; Clin. Invest. 70 (1992) 283–289. Tricker, A.R., G. Scherer, and F. Adlkofer: Influence of tobacco nitrate content on the yields of selected mainstream smoke components; 47th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 47, Paper No. 40, 1993, p. 46. Tricker, A.R., G. Scherer, F. Adlkofer, A. Pachinger, and H. Klus: Exogenous and endogenous exposure to tobacco-specific nitrosamines; 204th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC: Paper No. 158 (1992). Tricker, A.R., B. Spiegelhalder, and R. Preussmann: Environmental exposure to preformed N-nitroso compounds; Cancer Surv. 8 (1989) 251–272. Trifu, I.S.: Tobacco in Romania. I. Determination of tobacco quality by chemical analysis of tobacco smoke; Rev. Internat. Tabacs 32 (1957) 182. Trifu, I.S.: Determination of tobacco quality by chemical analysis of its smoke; Lucrarile Inst. Cercetari Aliment. 1 (1957) 145–160. Trifu, I.S.: L’Appréciation de la qualité du tabac et des cigarettes par l’analyse du courant principal de la fumée [Estimation of tobacco and cigarette quality by chemical analysis of mainstream smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 569–573. Trifu, I.S. and M. Dumitresu: Tar and nicotine content of cigarettes. Bulgarian cigarettes are least harmful; Bulgar. Tyutyun 3 (1958) 520–525. Trifu, I.S. and M. Dumitresu: The tars and nicotine in cigarette smoke; Rev. Internat. Tabacs 33 (1958) 27, 29–30. Trifu, I.S. and M. Dumitresu: La teneur en goudrons du courant principal de la fumée du tabac [The tar content of tobacco mainstream smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 574–578. Trifu, I.S. and M. Dumitresu: La correlation entre la teneur en certaines substances du tabac et la fumée [The relation between the levels of certain substances in tobacco and in smoke]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium, 1958 (1959) 579–590. Trifu, I.S. and M. Petrescu: Experimentelle untersuchungen zur Trocknung gruner Tabakblatter mit Infrarotstrahlern [Experimental investigation of the drying of tobacco leaves with infrared rays]; Lucrarile Inst. Cercetari Aliment. 2 (1960) 265–274; Chem. Zentr. (1960) 2038. Trillat, A.: Formaldehyd im Tabakrauch [Formaldehyde in tobacco smoke]; Chem. Ztg. 28 (1904) 1149; On the formation of formaldehyde during the combustion of tobacco; Compt. Rend. 139 (1904) 724-744; On the presence and formation of formaldehyde during combustion; Bull. Soc. Chim. Paris 33 (1905) 386–393. Trillat, J.J. and J. Cuzin: Sur la présence des paraffines dans le tabac [On the presence of paraffins in tobacco]; Compt. Rend. 246 (1958) 1040.
1419
3965. Trillat, J.J., J. Cuzin, and S. Barbezat: Sur la présence des paraffines dans le tabac [On the presence of paraffins in tobacco]; Bull. Acad. Natl. Med. Paris 145 (1961) 197–201. 3966. Trillat, J.J., J. Cuzin, L.Tertian, and K. Mihama: Study of tobacco smoke by microscopy and electron diffraction; Bull. Microsc. Appliquée 8 (1958) 64–70. 3966a. Trosko, J.E. and B.L. Upham: The emperor wears no clothes in the field of carcinogen risk assessment: Ignored concepts in cancer risk assessment; Mutagenesis 20 (2005) 81–92. 3967. Truhaut, R. and M. de Clerque: First results of the chemical and biological study of the products obtained during the pyrolysis of nicotine; Bull. Assoc. Franc. Étude Cancer 44 (1957) 426–439. 3968. Tschebull, E.: Die Analyse des Zigarettenrauches [Analysis of cigarette smoke]; Österr. Chem. Ztg. 37 (1934) 127–128. 3969. Tso, T.C.: Po210 and Pb210 in tobacco; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 211. 3970. Tso, T.C.: Examination of aflatoxin in tobacco and in cigarette smoke; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 213. 3971. Tso, T.C.: “Terpenes” in tobacco; Prevent. Med. 3 (1970) 294–299. 3972. Tso, T.C.: Physiology and biochemistry of tobacco plants; Dowden, Hutcherson and Ross, Inc., Stroudsburg, PA (1972). 3973. Tso, T.C.: Production, physiology, and biochemistry of tobacco plant; Ideals, Inc., Beltsville, MD (1990). 3974. Tso, T.C.: Production, physiology, and biochemistry of tobacco plant; Ideals, Inc., Beltsville, MD (1990), see Chapter 21, pp. 427–486. 3974a. Tso, T.C.: Production, physiology, and biochemistry of tobacco plant; Ideals, Inc., Beltsville, MD (1990), see Chapter 27, Table 27.1, Compounds reported in leaf tobacco, pp. 596–600. 3974b. Tso, T.C.: Seed to smoke; Chapter 1 in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 1–31. 3974c. Tso, T.C.: Tobacco research and its relevance to science, medicine and industry; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2006) 133–146. 3975. Tso, T.C. and J.F. Chaplin: Simple correlation and multiple regression among leaf characteristics, smoke components, and biological responses of bright tobaccos; USDA Tech. Bull. 1551 (1977) 1–135. 3976. Tso, T.C., J.F. Chaplin, J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Simple correlation and multiple regression among leaf and smoke characteristics of burley tobaccos; 7th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Manila, The Philippines, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1980: Paper APST 05, 137; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1982) 141–150. 3977. Tso, T.C., J.F. Chaplin, K.E. LeLacheur, and T.J. Sheets: Pesticide-treated vs. “pesticide-free” tobacco: 1. Tobacco production and leaf analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 114–119. 3978. Tso, T.C. and M.E. Engelhaupt: Amino acid content related to gradual development of calcium and boron deficiency symptoms in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 12–16.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1419
11/24/08 2:40:01 PM
1420
3979. Tso, T.C. and G.B. Gori: Effects of tobacco characteristics on cigarette smoke composition; in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972) 51–53. 3980. Tso, T.C., G.B. Gori, and D. Hoffmann: Reduction of nicotine and tar in tobacco and in cigarette through agricultural techniques; in: Modifying the risk for the smoker. Proc. 3rd World Conf. on Smoking and Health, edited by E.L. Wynder, D. Hoffmann, and G.B. Gori, 1975, DHEW Publ. No. (NIH) 76 1221 (1976) 35–48. 3981. Tso, T.C., N.A. Hallden, and L.T. Alexander: Radium226 and polonium-210 in leaf tobacco and tobacco soil; Science 146 (1964) 1043. 3982. Tso, T.C., N. Harley, and L.T. Alexander: Radium-226 and polonium-210 in burley and cigar wrapper tobacco; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 105–106. 3983. Tso, T.C., N. Harley, and L.T. Alexander: Source of lead210 and polonium-210 in tobacco; Science 153 (1966) 880–882. 3983a. Tso, T.C. and R.N. Jeffrey: Paper chromatography of alkaloids and their transformation products in Maryland tobacco; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 43 (1953) 269–285. 3983b. Tso, T.C. and J.E. McMurtrey Jr: Mineral deficiency and organic constituents in tobacco plants. II. Amino acids; Plant Physiol. 35 (1960) 865–870. 3984. Tso, T.C., G. Rathkamp, and D. Hoffmann Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXI. Correlation and multiple regression among selected cigarette-smoke constituents and leaf characteristics of bright tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 190–194. 3985. Tso, T.C., J.L. Sims, and D.E. Johnson: Some agronomic factors affecting N-dimethylnitrosamine content in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 34–38. 3986. Tso, T.C. and T. Sorokin: Examination of aflatoxin B1 in leaf tobacco and in cigarette smoke condensate; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1967) 18–20. 3986a. Tsuchiya, K., Y. Hayashi, M. Onodera, and T. Hasegawa: Toxicity of formaldehyde in experimental animals: Concentrations of the chemical in the elution from dishes of formaldehyde resin in some vegetables; Keio J. Med. 24 (1975) 19–37. 3987. Tsumura, H.: Carbon monoxide content of tobacco smoke; J. Chosen Med. Assoc 27 (1937) 926–929, see Chem. Abstr. 32 (1938) 1867. 3988. Tucciarone, P.L., J.D. Adams, E.J. LaVoie, M.R. Kagan, and D. Hoffmann: Quantitative analyses of steam distillates and aqueous extracts of commercial smokeless tobaccos; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 11, 1987, p. 17. 3988a. Tucker, S.P. and J.R. Pretty: Identification of oxidation products of solanesol produced during air sampling for tobacco smoke by electrospray mass spectrometry and HPLC; Analyst 130 (2005) 1414–1424. 3988b. Turesky, R.J., J.S. Wishnok, S.R. Tannenbaum, R.A. Pfund, and G.H. Buchi: Qualitative and quantitative characterization of mutagens in commercial beef extract; Carcinogenesis 4 (1983) 863–866. 3989. Turner, R.C. and J.M. Radley: Naturally occurring alpha activity of cigarette tobaccos; Lancet 1960(i) 1197–1198. 3990. Uccelli, P.: Determinazione analytica di alcuni componenti del fumo di tabacco e sua applicazione alla valutazione dell’efficienza del filtri per sigaretta
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
3990a.
3991.
3992.
3992a.
3993.
3994.
3995.
3996.
3997.
3998.
3999.
4000.
4001.
4002.
4003.
4004.
[Analytical determination of the alkaline components of tobacco smoke and its application to the evaluation of the efficiency of cigarette filters]; L’Hygiene Moderne 48 (1955) 636. Uchii, K. and S. Sato: Rapid analysis of phenolic compounds in tobacco smoke using fast GC technique; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 32, 2006, pp. 34–35. Uegaki, R., H. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, K. Kato, and N. Noguchi: Isolation of dehydrololiolide and 3-oxoactinidol from Nicotiana tabacum; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 1149–1150. Uhrig, M.S., E.L. White, B.M. Gordon, M.F. Borgerding, R.D. Hicks, and E.J. Nanni: Quantitation of selected components in mainstream smoke particulate phase (MSPP) of a Kentucky Reference Cigarette (1R4F) and a cigarette that heats rather than burns tobacco; 42nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 42, Paper No. 57, 1988, p. 45. Ulbrich, N., R. Hilgenfeld, H. Hanel, B. Sachse, P. Braun, J. Wink, P. Eckes, J. Logemann, and J. Schell: Antifungal polypeptide and process for its production; U.S. Patent No. 5,589,624 (December 12, 1996). Umemura, S., M. Muramatsu, and T. Okada: A study on precursors of nitric oxide in sidestream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 183–190. Underwood, J.G. and M.A. Bayliss: The mass spectrometric analysis of steam-volatile nitrosamines in cigarette smoke; BAT Co. Ltd. Report No. RD-939-AR (October 11, 1972). Unghvary, L., M. Hovanyi, and F. Farkas: Appearance of the fluorescent substances of tobacco smoke in the blood and changes of their concentration during smoking; Z. Ernahrungswiss. 3 (1963) 168–170. Urbanic, J.E., R.S. Joyce, J.J. Petty, and D.D. Tiggelbeck: The removal of hydrogen cyanide from cigarette smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 19, 1967, p. 11. Urbanic, J.E. and R.F. Sutt: Direct determination of nitric oxide in cigarette smoke; 23rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 23, Paper No. 7, 1969, p. 6. USDA: Research findings on the effects of maleic hydrazide on the suitability of tobacco for cigarette manufacture; USDA (1961) pp. 1–52. USPHS: Smoking and health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service; PHS Publ. No. 1103 (1964). USPHS: Smoking and health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service; PHS Publ. No. 1103 (1964) 57. USPHS: Smoking and health. Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service; PBS Publ. No. (PHS) 1103 (1964) 58. USPHS: Smoking and health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service; PHS Publ. No. 1103 (1964) 144–145. USPHS: The health consequences of smoking. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 72–7516 (1972). USPHS: The health consequences of smoking. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 74–8704 (1974).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1420
11/24/08 2:40:02 PM
Bibliography
4005. USPHS: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79–50066 (1979). 4006. USPHS: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79 50066 (1979) 14 51–52. 4007. USPHS: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79–50066 (1979) 14 51–52, 54 (Table 15). 4008. USPHS: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79 50066 (1979) 14 109–110. 4009. USPHS: The health consequences of smoking. The changing cigarette. A report of the Surgeon General; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 81–50156 (1981) 36. 4010. USPHS: The health consequences of smoking. Cancer. A report of the Surgeon General; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 82–50179 (1982). 4011. USPHS: The health consequences of smoking. Cancer. A report of the Surgeon General; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 82–50179 (1982) 183–235. 4012. USPHS: Reducing the health consequences of smoking. 25 Years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 89–8411 (1989). 4013. VOID 4014. Vaessen, H.A.M.G., P.L. Schuller, A.A. Jekel, and A.A.M.M. Wilbers: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in selected foods: Analysis and occurrence; Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 7 (1994) 297. 4014a. van Broekhoven, L.W. and J.A.R. Davies: N-Nitrosamines in grass silages; in: IARC, N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence and biological effects, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982) 319–326. 4015. VanDeMeent. D., J.W. DeLeeuw, and P.A. Schenck: Origin of unsaturated isoprenoid hydrocarbons in pyrolysates of suspended matter and surface sediments; Adv. Org. Geochem. (1979) 469–474. 4016. Van Druten, A.: Wirkung der “Bonikot” Injektion auf den Nikotingehalt von Zigarrenrauch [Influence of “Bonicot“ injection on the nicotine content of cigar smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 62 (1931) 633–647. 4017. Van Druten, A.: Diskussion der Arbeit von M. Hahn und O. Ehrismann: Nikotin und die Entnikotinisierung des Tabakrauches. Teil I [Discussion of the work of M. Hahn and O. Ehrismann: Nicotine and the denicotinization of tobacco smoke. Part I]; Z. Hyg. Infektionskrankh. 113 (1932) 754–755. 4018. Van Duuren, B.L.: The polynuclear hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; Proc. 1st Workshop Conf. on Lung Cancer Research (1958) 52–55. 4019. Van Duuren, B.L.: Identification of some polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette-smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 21 (1958) 1–16. 4020. Van Duuren, B.L.: The polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette-smoke condensate. II; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 21 (1958) 623–630. 4021. Van Duuren, B.L.: The fluorescence spectra of aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic aromatic compounds; Anal. Chem. 32 (1960) 1436–1442. 4022. Van Duuren, B.L.: Some aspects of the chemistry of tobacco smoke; Chapter 3 in: Tobacco and health, edited by G. James and T. Rosenthal, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL (1962) 33–47. 4022a. Van Duuren, B.L.: Separation and identification of aliphatic and aromatic carcinogens from environmental sources; Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 9 (1962) 135.
1421
4023. Van Duuren, B.L.: Effects of the environment on the fluorescence of aromatic compounds in solution; Chem. Rev. 63 (1963) 325–354. 4024. Van Duuren, B.L.: The metabolism of dibenz[a,h] anthracene; Acta Unio Internat. Contra Cancrum 19 (1963) 524–527. 4025. Van Duuren, B.L.: Fluorescence of tobacco coumarins, hydroxyflavones and related compounds. Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 820–823. 4026. Van Duuren, B.L.: Carcinogens, cocarcinogens, and tumor inhibitors in cigarette smoke condensate; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 105–112. 4027. Van Duuren, B.L., J.A. Bilbao, and C.A. Joseph: The origin and nature of the nitrogen heterocyclics in cigarette smoke condensate; Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg.In-Miniature, New York, NY (1960); The carcinogenic nitrogen heterocycles in cigarette smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 25 (1960) 53–61. 4028. Van Duuren, B.L. and B.M. Goldschmitt: Carcinogenic and tumor-promoting agents in tobacco carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 56 (1976) 1237–1242. 4029. Van Duuren, B.L., C. Katz, and B.M. Goldschmidt: Brief communication: Cocarcinogenic agents in tobacco carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 51 (1973) 703–705. 4030. Van Duuren, B.L. and A.I. Kosak: Isolation and identification of some components of cigarette smoke condensate; J. Org. Chem. 223 (1958) 473–475. 4031. Van Duuren, B.L. and N. Nelson: The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(4) (1958) 353. 4032. Van Duuren, B.L., N. Nelson, L. Orris, D. Palmes, and F.L. Schmitt: Carcinogenicity of epoxides, lactones, and peroxy compounds; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 31 (1963) 41–55; Van Duuren, B.L., L. Orris, and N. Nelson: Carcinogenicity of epoxides, lactones, and peroxy compounds. II; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 35 (1965) 707–717. 4033. Van Duuren, B.L. and F.L. Schmitt: Isolation and identification of squalene from cigarette smoke condensate; Chem. and Ind. (1958) 1006–1007. 4034. Van Duuren, B.L., A. Sivak, B.M. Goldschmitt, and C. Katz: Initiating activity of aromatic hydrocarbons in two-stage carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 44 (1970) 1167. 4035. Van Duuren, B.L., A. Sivak, C. Katz, and S. Melchionne: Cigarette smoke carcinogenesis: Importance of tumor promoters; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 47 (1971) 235–240. 4036. Van Duuren, B.L., A. Sivak, L. Langseth, B.M. Goldschmidt, and A. Segal: Initiators and promoters in tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Toward a less harmful cigarette, edited by E.L. Wynder and D. Hoffmann, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968) 173–180. 4037. Van Duuren, B.L., A. Sivak, A. Segal, L. Orris, and L. Langseth: The tumor-promoting agents of tobacco leaf and tobacco smoke condensate; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 37 (1966) 519–526. 4038. Van Duuren, B.L., G. Witz, and B.M. Goldschmitt: Structure-activity relationships of tumor promoters and cocarcinogens and interaction of phorbol myristate acetate and related esters with plasma membranes; in: Mechanism of tumor promotion and carcinogenesis. Vol. II, edited by T.J. Slaga, A. Sivak, and R.K. Boutwell, Raven Press, New York, NY (1978) pp. 491–507.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1421
11/24/08 2:40:02 PM
1422
4038b. van Kan, J.A.L., M.D. Van de Rhee, D. Zuidema, B.J.C. Cornelissen, and J.F. Bol: Structure of tobacco genes encoding thaumatin-like proteins; Plant Mol. Biol. 12 (1989) 153–155. 4039. Van Leeuwen, W.S.: On the nicotine content of the smoke of strong, mild and nicotine-free cigars; Arch. Exptl. Pathol. Pharmacol. 84 (1919) 282–316. 4039a. Van Loon, L.C. and A. Van Kammen: Polyacrylamide disc electrophoresis of the soluble leaf proteins from Nicotiana tabacum var. “Samsun” and “Samsun NN”. II. Changes in protein constitution after infection with tobacco mosaic virus; Virology 40 (1970) 199–211. 4039b. Varma, S.K., R.A.B. Verma, and A.K. Jha: Ecotoxicological aspects of Aspergilli present in the phylloplane of stored leaves of chewing tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum); Mycopathologia 113 (1991) 19–23. 4040. Varsel, C.J., F.E. Resnik, and F.A. Morrell: Quantitative analysis of gas phase of cigarette smoke by low-voltage spectrometry; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 26, 1963, pp. 18–19. 4041. Vaubel, W.: Der Ammoniakgehalt des Tabakrauches [The ammonia content of tobacco smoke]; Chem. Zeit. 35 (1911) 1331–1332. 4042. Vekris, S.L. and R.G. Hook: The distribution of substances between the vapor and particulate phases of cigarette smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 22, 1966, pp. 27–29. 4042a. Veldstra, H.: 3,5-Cholestadiene from cholesteryl oleate and its possible bearing upon the formation of carcinogenic substances in heated fats; Nature 144 (1939) 246–247. 4042b. Venkatarao, C., M. Narasingarao, and A. Venkateswarulu: Fatty acid composition of tobacco seed oil; J. Indian Chem. Soc. 20 (1943) 374, 376, see Chem. Abstracts (1194) 4821. 4042c. Venkatarao, C., M. Narasingarao, and A. Venkateswarulu: Glyceride composition of tobacco seed oil; J. Indian Chem. Soc. 21 (1944) 249–252. 4043. Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie, Wissenschaftliche Forschungstelle: Einheitliche Vorschriften für die Analyse von Tabak und Tabakrauch [Standardized regulations for the analysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 1 (1962) 311. 4044. Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie, Wissenschaftliche Forschungstelle: Polonium-210 in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie, Wissenschaft. Forsch., Hamburg, Germany (1964) pp. 1–5. 4045. Verband der Cigaretten-Industrie, Wissenschaftliche Forschungstelle: Einheitliche Vorschriften für die Analyse von Tabak und Tabakrauch. 4. Vorschrift für die Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabak, im Tabakrauch-kondensat und in Filtern [Standardized regulations for the analysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke. 4. Regulations for the determination of nicotine in tobacco, tobacco smoke condensate and in filters]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 87–89. 4046. Veresoglou, D.S., S.D. Sakellariadis, and P.A. Gerakis: Tolerance of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum and N. rustica) to high rates of lead application to the soil; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1987) 33–39. 4047. Veselinov, M.D.: Attempts at establishing objective characteristics for smoking properties of Bulgarian tobacco. I. Nicotine content and physiological strength of tobacco; Nauchn. Tr. Vissh. Inst. Khran. Vkusova Prom. Plovdiv. 9 (1962) 195–208.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4048. Vestal, L.L. and J.N. Schumacher: The synthesis of various compounds isolated from the steam condensate of Turkish tobacco; RDR, 1965, No. 41, September 17, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966240 -6251. 4049. Vettori, L.: Determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke; Anais Assoc. Brasil Quim. 10 (1951) 78–82. 4049a. Viaje, A., T.J. Siege, M. Wigler, and I.B. Weinstein: Effects of anti-inflammatory agents in mouse skin tumor promotion, epidermal DNA synthesis, phorbol ester-induced cellular proliferation, and production of plasminogen activator; Cancer Res. 37 (1977) 1530–1536. 4050. Viart, P.: Aromatization of tobacco. Determination of coumarin, dihydrocoumarin, ethylvanillin and vanillin in tobacco and its smoke; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 8(Sect. 1) (1970) 151–152. 4051. Viart, P. and M. Bensoussan: Automatic determination of alkaloids in cigarette smoke condensate; Ann. Dir. Études Équipement, SEITA 9(Sect. 1) (1971) 123–134. 4051a. Vickery, H.B. and I. Zelitch: The metabolism of the organic acids of tobacco leaves. XVII. Effect of culture of excised leaves in solutions of potassium pyruvate; J. Biol. Chem. 235 (1960) 1871–1875. 4052. Vickroy, D.G.: The characterization of cigarette smoke from Cytrel® synthetic smoking material and its comparison to smoke from flue-cured tobacco. I. Vapor phase analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 415–421. 4053. Vickroy, D.G. and G.L. Gaunt Jr: Determination of cyanide in cigarette smoke by a cyanide ion selective electrode; 25th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 25, Paper No. 25, 1971, p. 15; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 22–25. 4054. Vickroy, D.G. and R.K. Mauldin: Cyclopentenones in tobacco smoke; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 15, 1972, pp. 22–23. 4055. Vickroy, D.G. and R.K. Mauldin:The use of nonradioactive isotopes to determine the pyrosynthesis of cigarette smoke; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 16, 1977, p. 9. 4056. Vickroy, D.G., R.K. Mauldin, R.E. Allen, and R.K. Kunkel: Smoke chemistry comparison: Tobacco and Cytrel® tobacco supplement; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 189–190. 4057. Vilcins, G.: Infrared analysis of ethylene and isoprene in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; 27th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 22, 1973, p. 14; Determination of ethylene and isoprene in the gas phase of cigarette smoke by infrared spectroscopy; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 181–185. 4058. Vilcins, G. and J.O. Lephardt: Aging process of cigarette smoke: II. Formation of methyl nitrite; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 52, 1974, p. 33; Ageing process of cigarette smoke: Formation of methyl nitrite; Chem. and Ind. (London) (1974) 974–975. 4059. Vidal, B., M. Bouzige, R. Laroche, G. Figuères, and J. Biesse: TSNAs in tobacco and smoke: PLS regression for prediction and explanation of smoke contents according to chemical and physical characteristics; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 55, 2002, p. 53. 4060. Vogel, A.: Wassergehalt und ammonialkalische Verbrennungsprodukte des Tabaks [The water content
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1422
11/24/08 2:40:02 PM
Bibliography
4061.
4062.
4063.
4064.
4065.
4066.
4066a.
4067.
4068.
4068a.
4069.
4069a.
4069b.
4070.
and ammoniacal combustion products of tobacco]; Neues Repert. Pharm. 6 (1857) 1–3. Vogel, A.: Über ammonalkalische Verbrennungsprodukte des Tabaks (Fortsetzung) [The ammoniacal combustion products of tobacco (continuation)]; Neues Repert. Pharm. 6 (1857) 153–156. Vogel, A.: Über die ammonalkalische Verbrennungsprodukte und den Aschegehalt eniger Tabakarten [On the ammoniacal burning products and the ash content of certain tobacco types]; Dingler’s Polytech. J. 148 (1858) 228–231. Vogel, A.: and C. Reischauer: Der Schwefelwasserstoffund Prussinsäuregehalt des Tabakrauches [The hydrogen sulfide and prussic acid content of tobacco smoke]; Dingler’s Polytech. J. 148 (1858) 231–233. Vohl, H. and H. Eulenberg: The physiological action of tobacco used as a narcotic, with special reference to the constituents of tobacco smoke; Viertel. Gerich. Offent. Med. 14 (1871) 249–290; Arch. Pharm. 147 (1871) 130– 166; abstr. in J. Chem. Soc. (1871) 1075–1078. Vohl, H. and H. Eulenberg: The toxicological nature of tobacco with particular reference to the chemical composition of smoke; Viertel. Gerich. Offent. Med. 14 (1871) 249–290. Voisine, R., F. Côté, J. Verreault, and A. Porter: Protein transfer in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 9–14. Vold, B.S. and N.J. Leonard: Production and characterization of antibodies and establishment of a radioimmunoassay for ribosylzeatin; Plant Physiol. 67 (1981) 401–403. Volgger, D., I. Rohregger, V. Unterholzner, and A. Zemann: Influence of cigarette paper properties on the formation of Hoffmann type analytes in smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 30, 2003, pp. 36–37. Völlmin, J.A., I. Omura, J. Seibl, K. Grob, and W. Simon: Einsatz gas-chromatografischer Kolonnen hoher Trennleistung in direkter Kombination mit dem Massenspektrometer [Insertion of a gas chromatographic column with higher separation performance in direct combination with the mass spectrometer]; Helv. Chim. Acta 49 (1966) 1768–1778. von Baeyer, A.:Verläufige Notiz über das Hydantoin [Preliminary note about hydantoin]; Liebigs Ann. Chem. 117 (1861) 178–180. Voncken, P., B. Gerstenberg, K. Rustemeier, R. Stabbert, G. Patskan, and H.J. Haussmann: Chemical analysis of selected cigarette mainstream smoke constituents for comparative product integrity testing; 52nd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 52, Paper No. 46, 1998, p. 36. von Dahl, C.C. and I.T. Baldwin: Methyl jasmonate and cis-jasmone do not dispose of the herbivore-induced jasmonate burst in Nicotiana attenuata; Physiol. Plantarum 120 (2004) 474–481. von Schaewen, A., M. Stitt, R. Schmidt, U. Sonnewald, and L. Willmitzer: Expression of yeast-derived invertase in the cell wall of tobacco and Arabidopsis plants leads to accumulation of carbohydrate and inhibition of photosynthesis and strongly influences growth and phenotype of transgenic tobacco plants; EMBO J. 9 (1990) 3033–3044. Vucetich, D.C. and R. Carratala: Presence of arsenic in tobacco; Experimental investigation; Revista Asoc. Med. Argentina 56 (1942) 397–399.
1423
4071. Vujovic, B., M. Stevanovic, and S. Radmic: Sadrza nikotina i arsena u nekim nasim cigaretama i kolicine koje se unose u organizam pri piseniu [The nicotine and arsenic contents in some of our cigarettes and the quantity carried into the body on smoking]; Arh. Farm. (Belgrade) 11 (1961) 171–176. 4072. Vuletic, N. and L. Tomic: The relation between nitrogen fertilization and TPM and nicotine in smoke from fluecured tobacco cigarettes; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S15, 121. 4072a. Wada, E.: Chemical constituents of tobacco. III. Kaempferol3-rhamnoglucoside from the flowers of Nicotiana sylvestris. J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 26 (1952) 159–162. 4073. Wada, E.: Conversion of nicotine to nornicotine in cherry red tobacco during flue-curing; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 118–119. 4073a. Wada, S., M. Hirose, Y. Shichino, K. Ozaki, T. Hoshiya, K. Kato, and T. Shirai: Effects of catechol, sodium chloride and ethanol either alone or in combination on gastric carcinogenesis in rats pretreated with N-methyl-N’-nitro-Nnitrosoguanidine; Cancer Lett. 123 (1999) 127–134. 4073b. Wagner, G.: Leaf chemistry. C. Leaf surface chemistry; Chapter 8C in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 292–303. 4074. Wagner, G.J. and N.R. Reece: Different mechanisms for Cd and Zn accumulation in tobacco; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 61, 1986, p. 33; Wagner, G.J., T.G. Sutton, and R. Yeargan: Root control of leaf cadmium accumulation in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 32 (1988) 88–91. 4075. Wagner, J.R. and N.A. Thaggard: An automated method for the gas chromatographic determination of nicotine in smoke; Tob. Sci. 18 (1974) 63–66. 4076. Wagner, J.R., N.A. Thaggard, and W.C. Thompson: Determination of nicotine contained on Cambridge filter pads; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 42, 1977, p. 22; Wagner, J.R. and N.A. Thaggard: Gas-liquid chromatographic determination of nicotine contained on Cambridge filter pads; J. Assoc. Off. Anal.Chem. 62 (1979) 229–236. 4077. Wagner, K.A. and I.G. Gillman Jr : The rapid and quantitative analysis of tobacco specific N-nitrosamines in whole tobacco using LC/MS/MS with positive ion electrospray; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 57, 2001, pp. 53–54. 4078. Wagner, K.A., R. Higby, and K. Stutt: Puff-by-puff analysis of selected mainstream smoke constituents in the Kentucky Reference 2R4F cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2005) 273–279. 4078a. Wahl, F.: Kohlenmonoxid im Tabakrauch [Carbon monoxide in tobacco smoke]; Arch. Gesammte Physiol. Mensch. Tiere 28 (1899) 262–285. 4079. Wahl, R.: Carbohydrate derivatives in tobacco and in smoke; Tabakforsch. 4(19) (1957) 42; Tabakforsch. 4(22) (1957) 61–64. 4080. Wahl, R.: Photometric determination of nicotinamide as nicotinic acid in tobacco smoke; Z. Anal. Chem. 204 (1964) 25–28. 4081. Wahl, R.: Nachweis von Nitrosen in der Partikelphase des Tabakrauches mit 1,2,4-Xylenol [Detection of nitroso compounds in the particulate phase of tobacco
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1423
11/24/08 2:40:02 PM
1424
4081a. 4082.
4083.
4084.
4085.
4086.
4086a.
4087.
4088.
4089. 4090.
4091.
4092.
4093.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
smoke with 1,2,4-xylenol]; Chapter in: Compounds having alkylating action, Verband der Cigarettenindustrie, Wissenschaftliche Forschungstelle, Hamburg FRG (1964) pp. 117–118. Wahl, R.: Aminozueker im Tabak [Amino acids in tobacco]; Z. Lebensm 148 (1972) 94–96. Wahl, R. and O. Heil: Die Entwicklung einer neuen Rauchapparatur unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Strömungsverhältnisse [Development of a new smoking apparatus with special regard to the gas flow relationships]; in: Sonderheft anlasslich des 25 jahrigenn Bestehens der Bundesanstalt für Tabakforschung in Forchheim [Volume devoted to the 25 years’ existence of the Institute for Tobacco Study in Forchheim] (1953) 16–20. Wahlberg, I., R. Arndt, I. Wallin, C. Vogt, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 59. Six new cembratrienols from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B38 (1984) 21–30. Wahlberg, I., D. Behr, A.-M. Eklund, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, and J.-E. Berg: Tobacco chemistry. 54. (1S,2E,4S,6E,8S,11R,12S)-8,11-epoxy-2,6-cembradiene-4,12-diol, a new constituent of Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B36 (1982) 37–41. Wahlberg, I., D. Behr, A.-M. Eklund, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, and J.-E. Berg: Tobacco chemistry. 56. The stereochemistries of the tobacco diterpenoids: The (1S,2E,4S,6E,8S,11E)- and (1S,2E,4R,6E,8S,11E)-2, 6,11-cembratriene-4,8–diols, Acid-induced transformations of cembratrienediols; Acta Chem. Scand. B36 (1982) 443–449. Wahlberg, I., M. Curvall, and C.R. Enzell: Syntheses of (12R,13S)- and (12S,13R)-epoxy-14-labden-13-ol and (12S,13R)-13-epoxy-14-labdeb-12-ol, three tobacco diterpenoids; Acta Chem. Scand. B32 (1978) 310. Wahlberg, I. and A.-M. Eklund: Cyclized cembranoids of natural occurrence; Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 60 (1992) 1–141; Cembranoids, pseudopteranoids and cubitanoids of natural occurrence; in: Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products, edited by W. Herz, G.W. Kirby, R.E. Moore, W. Steglich, and C. Tamm, Springer Verlag, New York 59 (1992) 141–294. Wahlberg, I., A.-M. Eklund, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, and J.-E. Berg: 7,8-Epoxy-4-basmen-6-one, a tobacco diterpenoid having a novel skeleton; Tetrahedron Lett. 24 (1983) 843–846. Wahlberg, I., A.-M. Eklund, C. Vogt, C.R. Enzell, and J.-E. Berg: Tobacco chemistry. 65. Two new 7,8-epoxycembranoids from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B40 (1986) 855–860. Wahlberg, I. and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco cembranoids; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 93–104. Wahlberg, I. and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco isoprenoids [A review of literature between 1975 and 1984]; Natural Products Rept. 4(3) (1987) 237–276. Wahlberg, I., I. Forsblom, C. Vogt, A.-M. Eklund, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, and J.-E. Berg: Tobacco chemistry. Tobacco chemistry. 62. Five new cembranoids from tobacco; J. Org. Chem. 50 (1985) 4527–4538. Wahlberg, I., K. Karlsson, D.J. Austin, N. Junker, J. Roeraade, C.R. Enzell, and W.H. Johnson: Effects of flue-curing and ageing on the volatile neutral and acidic constituents of Virginia tobacco; Phytochemistry 16 (1977) 1217–1231. Wahlberg, I., K. Karlsson, D.J. Austin, N. Junker, J. Roeraade, C.R. Enzell, and W.H. Johnson: Effects of
4094.
4095.
4096.
4097.
4098.
4098a.
4099.
4100.
4101.
4102.
4102a.
4103.
4104.
4105.
flue-curing and ageing on the volatile basic constituents of Virginia tobacco; Phytochemistry 16 (1977) 1233–1235. Wahlberg, I., K. Karlsson, M. Curvall, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Sensitized photo-oxygenation of (12Z)-avienol. Biomimetic synthesis of tobacco labdanoids; Acta Chem. Scand. B32 (1978) 203. Wahlberg, I., K. Karlsson, T. Nishida, K.-P. Cheng, C.R. Enzell, J.-E. Berg and A.-M. Pilotti: Syntheses of (12R,13R)and (12S,13S)-epoxy-14-labden-13-ol and (13R)- and (13S)-8,13-epoxy-14-labdeb-12-one, four tobacco diterpenoids; Acta Chem. Scand. B31 (1977) 453. Wahlberg, I., R.C. Long, P. Brandt, and A. Wiernik: The development of low TSNA tobaccos. I. Effects of tobacco genotype and fertilization on the formation of TSNA; CORESTA, Mtg. Smoke-Technology and Agro-Phyto Groups, Innsbruck, Austria (1999) Paper ST17/AP38. Wahlberg, I., K. Nordfors, M. Curvall, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 48. Synthesis of tobacco labdanoids by sensitized photo-oxygenation of (12E)-abienol; Acta Chem. Scand. B33 (1979) 609–613. Wahlberg, I., K. Nordfors, C. Vogt, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 60. Five new hydroperoxycembratrienediols from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B37 (1983) 653–656. Wahlberg, I. and T. Ringberger: Smokeless tobacco; Chapter 14 in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 452–460. Wahlberg, I., I. Wallin, C. Narbonne, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Notes on the stereostructures of thunbergol (isocembrol) and 4-epiisocembrol; Acta Chem. Scand. B35 (1981) 65–68. Wahlberg, I., I. Wallin, C. Narbonne, T. Nishida, C.R. Enzell, and J.-E. Berg: Tobacco chemistry. 55. Three new cembranoids from Greek tobacco. The stereochemistry of (1S,2E,4S,6R,7E,11E)-2,7,11-cembratiene-4,6diols; Acta Chem. Scand. B36 (1982) 147–153. Wahlberg, I., I. Wallin, K. Nordfors, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 49. New labdanic diterpenois isolated from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B33 (1979) 541–543. Wahlberg, I., E.B. Walsh, I. Forsblom, S. Oscarson, C.R. Enzell, R. Ryhage, and R. Isaksson: Tobacco chemistry. 64. A new sucrose ester from Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B40 (1986) 724–730. Wakabayashi, K., K. Tsuji, T. Kosuge, K .Takeda, K. Yamaguchi, K. Shudo, Y. Iitaka, T. Okamoto, T. Yahagi, M. Nagao, and T. Sugimura: Isolation and structure determination of a mutagenic substance in L-lysine pyrolysate; Proc. Japan Acad. 54 (Series B) (1978) 569–571. Wakeham, H.: Recent trends in tobacco and tobacco smoke research; Symposium on the Composition of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke, Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg., Washington, DC (1971); in: The chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by I. Schmeltz, Plenum Press, New York, NY (1972) 1–20. Wakeham, H. and H. Silberman: Effect of cellulose on taste of cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 605–610; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1085–1092. Wakeham, H.R.R.: Environmental carbon monoxide from cigarette smoking; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1424
11/24/08 2:40:02 PM
Bibliography
4106.
4107.
4108.
4108a.
4108b.
4109.
4110.
4111.
4112.
4113.
4114.
4115.
4116.
4117.
Cong., Tokyo, Japan (1976) 93–101; Environmental carbon monoxide from cigarette smoking: A critique; Prev. Med. 6 (1977) 526–534. Waldman, J.M., P.J. Lioy, A. Greenberg, and P. Butler: Analysis of human exposure to benzo(a)pyrene via inhalation and food ingestion in the total human exposure study (THEES); J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1 (1991) 193–225. Walker, E.K.: Some chemical characteristics of cured leaves of flue-cured tobacco relative to time of harvest, stalk position and chlorophyll content of the green leaves; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 58–65. Walker, E.K.: Correlations among physical characteristics, and between physical and chemical characteristics, in cured leaves of flue-cured tobacco harvested at different stages of maturity; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 86–90. Walker, R.T., A.J. Dyakonov, J. Guan, and D.S. Passer: Impact of solvent treatment of tobacco on cigarette burn characteristics and on mainstream smoke yields of selected compounds; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 92, 2005, p. 70. Walker, R.T., A.J. Dyakonov, and D.S. Passer: Impact of PAHs, plant constituents and larger phenols on mainstream smoke yields of selected phenolic compounds; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 89, 2005, p. 68. Walker, T.R. and J.E. Kiefer: Ciliastatic components in the gas phase of cigarette smoke; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 28, 1965, p. 41; Science 153 (1966) 1248–1250. Walker, W.E. Jr: Phosphorimetric determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons; RDR, 1961, No. 6, January 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936069 -6096. Wallace, L., E. Pellizari, T.D. Hartwell, R. Perritt, and R. Ziegenus: Exposure to benzene and other volatile compounds from active and passive smoking; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 42 (1987) 272–279. Wallin, I., C. Narbonne, I. Wahlberg, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Two new acyclic diterpenoids from Nicotiana sylvestris; Acta Chem. Scand. B34 (1980) 391. Walters, D.B.: Monitoring phenolics in cigarette smoke condensate fractions by micropolyamide thin-layer chromatography; in: Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, edited by J.L. McKenzie, R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977) 584–592; J. Anal. Toxicol. 1 (1977) 218–220. Walters, D.B., W.J. Chamberlain, M.E. Snook, and O.T. Chortyk: High-pressure liquid chromatography for monitoring benzo[a]pyrene contents of cigarette smoke condensate fractions; Anal. Chim. Acta 73 (1974) 194–197. Walters, D.B., W.J. Chamberlain, and O.T. Chortyk: cis and trans Fatty acids in cigarette smoke condensate; Anal. Chim. Acta 77 (1975) 309–311. Waltz, P.: Cigarette filter: A review of theoretical and practical aspects; Tabak Technicum (Hamburg) 1961(21) (1961) 1–7. Waltz, P. and M. Häusermann: Sur un traitement du tabac en vue de diminuer la teneur en hydrocarbures policycliques de la fumée [On the treatment of tobacco to diminish the level of polycyclic hydrocarbons in its smoke]; Z. Präventivmed. 8 (1963) 111–124.
1425
4118. Waltz, P. and M. Häusermann: Betrachtumgen zu einer Arbeit über die Phenolretention in Cigarettenfiltern [Discussion of a study on the adsorption capacity of cigarette filters for phenols]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 67–72. 4119. Waltz, P. and M. Häusermann: An approach to a mathematical description of the smoke yield from a cigarette; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1964(3) 7–28. 4120. Waltz, P. and M. Häusermann: New findings about formation and transformation of tobacco smoke; CORESTA Sci. Comm. Mtg., Vienna, Austria (1964). 4121. Waltz, P. and M. Häusermann: Betrachtungen über die Veränderung des Tabakrauches in der Cigarette. Die Ausbeute an Rohkondensat Gesamtwasser, Pyridin, Nikotin, Phenol, Brenzcatechin, Scopoletin und Kohlenoxid in Cigarettenrauch in Abhängigkeit von der Zugnummer und vom Rauchfilter [Examination of cigarette smoke components: The yield of total particulate matter, total water, pyridine, nicotine, phenol, catechol, scopoletin and carbon oxide in cigarette smoke in correlation to puff number and cigarette filter]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 169–202. 4122. Waltz, P., M. Häusermann, and R. Hirsbrunner: Factors Influencing the retention of smoke constituents in cigarette filters; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1102–1114. 4123. Waltz, P., M. Häusermann, and A. Krull: Methoden der quantitativen Bestimmung des Brenzcatechins in Cigarettenrauch [Method for the quantitative estimation of catechol in cigarette smoke]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 263–277. 4124. Waltz, P., M. Häusermann, and A. Krull: Quantitative Bestimmung des Scopoletin im Zigarettenrauch [Quantitative estimation of scopoletin in cigarette smoke]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 126 (1965) 417–425. 4125. Waltz, P., M. Häusermann, and F. Moser: Bestimmung des im Rauchkondensat enthaltenes Wassers durch Spektrophotometrie im nahen Infrarot [Determination of the water content of cigarette smoke condensate by near infra-red spectrophotometry]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1963) 39–50. 4126. Waltz, P., M. Häusermann, and F. Moser: Zur Bestimmung des Pyridins im Rauch von Cigaretten im Rahmen der Bestimmung der Gesamtalkaloide [The determination of pyridines in tobacco smoke during a routine determination of smoke alkaloids]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 283–293. 4127. Waltz, P., M. Häusermann, and E. Nyari: Photometric determination of nicotine in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. 50 (1959) 159–165. 4128. Wanfeng, L. and W. Yuangying: Study of the tobaccospecific nitrosamines (TSNAs), nitrate, nitrite, and alkaloids in different flue-cured tobacco genotypes; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 53, 2002, p. 52. 4129. Wang, A., Y. Zhang, Q. Huang, M. Zhu, and K.J. Chai: Elementary research on reducing TSNA in burley tobacco by applying bacteria; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 84, 2004, p. 74 4129a. Wang, C.-N., M. Möller, and Q.C.B. Cronk: Altered expression of GFLO, the Gesneriaceae homologue of FLORICAULA/LEAFY, is associated with the transition to bulbil formation in Titanotrichum oldhamii; Develop. Genes Evolut. 214 (2004) 122–127. 4130. Wang, J., S. Haut, and W. Hempfling: Improved methodology for determining N-nitrosoproline in tobacco; 55th
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1425
11/24/08 2:40:03 PM
1426
4131.
4131a.
4132.
4133.
4134.
4135.
4136.
4137.
4138.
4139.
4140.
4141.
4142.
4143.
4144.
4145.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 99, 2001, pp. 77–78. Wang, M.X., S.C. Moldoveanu, J.H. Lauterbach, and W.W. Weeks: A fast technique for analyzing organic acids in tobacco; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 8, 1994, pp. 27–28. Wang, S., W., X. Fuwei, W. Ming, and M. Zhao: Study of polyphenols in burley tobacco during growing, harvesting and curing; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No. 83, 2004, pp. 73–74. Warburg, H.: Nikotin- und Pyridingehalt des Tabakrauches bei Verwendung schwerer und leichter sowie nikotinfreier Tabake und “nikotinunschädlicher” Zigarren [Nicotine and pyridine content of tobacco smoke by use of strong and mild as well as “nicotine-free” tobaccos and “nicotine-harmless” cigars]; Thesis, Würzburg University (1906) pp. 1–38. Warfield, A.H., W.D. Galloway, and A.G. Kallianos: Some new alkaloids from burley tobacco; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 3371–3375. Warner, B.R. and M.E. Hobbs: An investigation of the technique and methods for the study and evaluation of the physical and chemical properties of some aerosols; Progress Rept. No. 1, Damon Runyon Memorial Fund, Research Project DRIR-186 (1953). Warner, B.R. and L.S. Raptis: The determination of acids and bases in cigarette smoke. I. The determination of formic acid and other volatile acids; 9th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 9, Paper No. 1, 1955, p. 1. Warren, N.D.: The Hoffmann analyte to “tar” ratio paradox; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 45, 2003, p. 47. Warren, N.D.: Prediction of mainstream cigarette smoke Hoffmann analyte yields by statistical modeling; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 50, 2003, p. 50. Wartman, W.B. Jr and E.S. Harlow: The determination of total solids, tars and resins, and nicotine in cigarette smoke; 133rd Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., San Francisco, CA (1958); Wartman, W.B. Jr, E.C. Cogbill, and E.S. Harlow: Determination of particulate matter in concentrated aerosols; Anal. Chem. 31 (1959) 1705–1709. Waser, E.: Über Tabak und Tabakprodukte [Tobacco and tobacco products]; Mitt. Gebiete Lebensm. Hyg. 26 (1935) 205–211. Waser, E. and M. Stähli: Untersuchung des Tabakrauches. I [Investigation of tobacco smoke. I]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 64 (1932) 470–485. Waser, E. and M. Stähli: Untersuchung des Tabakrauches. II [Investigation of tobacco smoke. II]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 64 (1932) 569–573. Waser, E. and M. Stähli: Untersuchung des Tabakrauches. III [Investigation of tobacco smoke. III]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 66 (1933) 354–362. Waser, E. and M. Stähli: Untersuchung des Tabakrauches. IV [Investigation of tobacco smoke. IV]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 67 (1934) 280–284. Wassermann, L.: Chemie des Tabakrauches [The chemistry of tobacco smoke]; Naturwiss. Rundschau 17(6) (1964) 236. Watanabe, M. and Y. Kobashi: Analytical methods for chemical components in tobacco smoke. I. Determination of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in cigarette
4146.
4147.
4148.
4149.
4149a. 4149b.
4149c.
4149d.
4150.
4151.
4152.
4153.
4154.
4155.
4156.
4157. 4158.
smoke by gas chromatography; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 177–180. Watanabe, M. and Y. Kobashi: Gas chromatographic determination of some low boiling components in cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 109 (1967) 133. Watanabe, R. and S.H. Wender: Flavonoid and certain related phenolic compounds in parts of the tobacco flower; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 112 (1965) 111–114. Watson, D.C., R.W. Hale, and H.R. Randolph: Automation of the gas chromatographic analysis of water in smoke particulate matter; J. Chromat. Sci. 8 (1970) 143–146. Watson, D.C., R.M. Ikeda, and F.E. Resnik: An automated GLC apparatus for the evaluation of the gas phase of cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 10 (1966) 88–94. Wattenberg, L.W.: Inhibitors of chemical carcinogens; Adv. Cancer Res. 26 (1978) 197–226. Wattenberg, L.W.: Inhibitors of chemical carcinogens; in: Cancer: Achievements, challenges and prospects for the 1980’s, edited by J.H. Burchenal, Grune and Stratton, New York, NY (1981) 517–539. Wattenberg, L.W., J.B. Coccia, and K.T. Lam: Inhibitory effects of phenolic compounds on benzo[a]pyrene-induced neoplasia; Cancer Res. 40 (1980) 2820–2823. Wattenberg, L.W., L.K.T. Lam, and A.V. Fladmoe: Inhibition of chemical carcinogen-induced neoplasia by coumarins and angelica lactone; Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 1651–1654. Waymack, B. E.: Effect of additives on evolution of aliphatic hydrocarbons from pyrolysis of tobacco; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 70, 2002, p. 63. Waymack, B.E. and D.S. Kellogg: Pyrolysis of precharred carbohydrates and tobacco. Part I; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 21, 1999, p. 31. Waymack, B.E. and D.S. Kellogg: The effects of additives on pyrolysis of tobacco chars; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 35, 2000, pp. 38–39. Waymack, B.E. and D.S. Kellogg: Butadiene from pyrolysis of tobacco; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 50, 2001, p. 50. Waymack, B.E., D.S. Kellogg, D.D. McRae, and R.W. Dwyer: Watts in a cigarette: Thermophysical properties of smoldering cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 41 (1997) 74–78. Weaving, A.S.: The use of 3-methylbenzothiazolone hydrazone hydrochloride for the estimation of aliphatic aldehydes in cigarette smoke; 19th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 19, Paper No. 31, 1965, p. 47. Weaving, A.S.: The polyphenols of flue-cured tobacco: Separation and identification of the major polyphenols; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 1–8. Weaving, A.S.: The determination of rutin in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 1–6. Weber, K.H.: Recent changes in tobacco products and their acceptance by the consumer; Proceedings 6th International Tobacco Scientific Congress, Tokyo, Japan (1976) 47–63; United States Public Health Service: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79–50066 (1979): See Chapter 14, pp. 111–112.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1426
11/24/08 2:40:03 PM
Bibliography
4158a. Weber, N. and H.K. Mangold: Metabolism of long-chain alcohols in cell suspension cultures of soya and rape; Planta 155 (1982) 225–230. 4159. Weeks, W.W.: Chemistry of tobacco constituents influencing flavor and aroma; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 11 (1985) 175–200. 4159a. Weeks, W.W.: Leaf chemistry. D. Relationship between leaf chemistry and organoleptic properties of tobacco smoke; Chapter 8D in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 304–312. 4159b. Weeks, W.W. and H. Seltmann: Effect of sucker control on the volatile compounds in flue-cured tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 34 (1986) 899–904. 4159c. Weerapradist, W. and G. Shklar: Vitamin E inhibition of hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis; Oral Surg. 54 (1982) 304–312. 4160. Wegner, E.: Zum Nachweis von 8-Oxychinolin im Rauch von mit 8-Oxychinolinhydrogensulfat behandeltem Rauchtabak [Identification of 8-hydroxyquinoline in the smoke of tobacco treated with 8-hydroxyquinolinepotassium hydrogen sulfate]; Arzneimittelforschung 6 (1956) 299–300. 4161. Wei, X., H.R. Burton, and L.P. Bush: Accumulation of tobacco-specific nitrosamine precursors during curing; 50th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 73, 1996, pp. 64–65. 4161a. Weil-Malherbe, H.: Formation of water-soluble complexes of PAHs with purines; Biochem. J. 40 (1946) 351, 363. 4162. Weltry, R.E. and D.G. Vickroy: Evaluation of cigarettes made with mold-damaged and nondamaged flue-cured tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1975) 102–106. 4163. Wender, S.H. and C.H. Yang: Free phenolic acids and aldehydes in cigarette smoke and in tobacco; 145th Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., New York, NY (1963). 4164. Wender, S.H., C.H. Yang, and Y. Nakagawa: Studies on scopoletin in cigarette tobacco smoke; 133rd Natl. Mtg., Am. Chem. Soc., San Francisco, CA (1958). 4165. Wenger, R.: Compounds in flue-cured (C9 blend) and burley (K4 blend) stems; RDM, 1955, No. 22, May 30), see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610223 -0224. 4166. Wenliang, S., P. Junqing, X. Wenyan, and Y. Liangju: Determination of six volatile organic compounds in the vapor phase of cigarette smoke by adsorption/thermal desorption and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; Manuscript (2004). 4167. Wenusch, A.: Nikotinbestimmungen in den Rauchgasen normaler und entnikotinisierter Zigarren [Nicotine determination in the smoke gases of normal and denicotinized cigars]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1927/1928(1) 7–8. 4168 Wenusch, A.: Nikotinmenge im Tabakrauch und Nikotinaufnahme durch den menschlichen Organismus beim normalen (intermittierenden) Rauchen [Nicotine content of tobacco smoke and nicotine uptake in the human organism during normal, puff by puff smoking]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1928(3) 8–11. 4169. Wenusch, A.: Beiträge zum Entnikotinisierungsproblem. I [Contribution to the denicotinization problem. I]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1929(2) 8–11. 4170. Wenusch, A.: Beiträge zum Entnikotinisierungsproblem.II [Contribution to the denicotinization problem. II]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1929(2) 11–12. 4171. Wenusch, A.: Beiträge zum Entnikotinisierungsproblem. III [Contribution to the denicotinization problem. III]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1929(3) 9–13.
1427
4172. Wenusch, A.: Beiträge zum Entnikotinisierungsproblem. IV [Contribution to the denicotinization problem. IV]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1929(4) 5–10. 4173. Wenusch, A.: Beiträge zum Entnikotinisierungsproblem.V [Contribution to the denicotinization problem. V]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1930(1) 13–19. 4174. Wenusch, A.: Die Reaktion des Tabakrauches [The reaction of tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1930(2) 13–15. 4175. Wenusch, A.: Beitrag zur Bestimmung des Nikotins in Rauchgasen. I. [Contribution to the determination of nicotine in smoke. I]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1931(1) 1–8. 4176. Wenusch, A.: Beitrag zur Bestimmung des Nikotins in Rauchgasen. II. [Contribution to the determination of nicotine in smoke. II]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1931(2) 1–3. 4177. Wenusch, A.: [Review of a tobacco smoke paper by W. Storp.]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1931(2) 10. 4178. Wenusch, A.: Über die Stärke der Tabakfabrikate [On the strength of tobacco products]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1931(3) 1–10. 4179. Wenusch, A.: Über die Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch [Determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 271 (1934) 280–284. 4180. Wenusch, A.: Über die Verteilung des Nikotins beim Rauchen von Zigaretten [On the distribution of nicotine in cigarette smoke]; Chem. Zeit. 58 (1934) 206–207. 4181. Wenusch, A.: Über die Verteilung des Nikotins beim Rauchen von Zigaretten [On the distribution of nicotine in cigarette smoke]; Chem. Zeit. 58 (1934) 310. 4182. Wenusch, A.: Über die Verteilung des Nikotins beim Rauchen von Zigaretten [On the distribution of nicotine in cigarette smoke]; Chem. Zeit. 58 (1934) 543. 4183. Wenusch, A.: Theoretische Grundlagen zur Kenntnis der Nikotinverteilung beim Rauchen von Zigaretten [Theoretical basis for information on the nicotine distribution in cigarette smoking]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 68 (1934) 412–420. 4184. Wenusch, A.: Über das Vorkommen von höheren Kohlenwasserstoffen im Tabakrauch [Occurrence of higher hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke]; Biochem. Z. 273 (1934) 178–179. 4185. Wenusch, A.: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Tabakrauchs [Contribution to the knowledge of tobacco smoke]; Pharm; Zentralhalle 76 (1935) 297–300. 4186. Wenusch, A.: Über das Vorkommen von Harzen im Tabakrauch [The occurrence of resins in tobacco smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 69 (1935) 81–85. 4187. Wenusch, A.: The occurrence of hydrogen sulfide in tobacco smoke; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 70 (1935) 201– 204, see Chem. Abstr. 29 (1935) 8228. 4188. Wenusch, A.: Classification of tobacco; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 70 (1935) 506–510. 4189. Wenusch, A.: Über die Anreicherung von Nikotin im Stummel von Zigaretten aus Orient Tabaken [Accumulation of nicotine in the butt of cigarettes made with Oriental tobacco]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 70 (1935) 536–537. 4190. Wenusch, A.: Der Nikotingehalt des Hauptstromrauchs dicker und dünner Zigaretten [The nicotine content of the mainstream smoke of thick and thin cigarettes]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 72 (1936) 213–218. 4191. Wenusch, A.: Über die Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch [Determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 77 (1936) 645–646.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1427
11/24/08 2:40:03 PM
1428
4192. Wenusch, A.: Über die nichtflüchtigen Bestandteile des Tabakrauchs [Composition of the nonvolatile constituents of tobacco smoke]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 78 (1937) 238–241. 4193. Wenusch, A.: Über die Abrauchmethode von B. Pfyl [On the smoking method of B. Pfyl]; Pharm. Zentralhalle 78 (1937) 189–191. 4194. Wenusch, A.: Wissenschafliche Grundlagen für die Beurteilung der Stärke von Rauchwaren [Scientific basis for the determination of the strength of smoking materials]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 73 (1937) 176–185. 4195. Wenusch, A.: Die Harze des Zigarrenrauches [The resins of cigar smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 73 (1937) 189–191. 4196. Wenusch, A.: Über die Menge an nichtflüchtigen Tabakrauchbestandteilen und die Löslichkeit von Nikotinsalzen in verschiedenen Lösungsmitteln [The amount of nonvolatile tobacco smoke constituents and the solubility of nicotine salts in different solvents]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 74 (1937) 43–46. 4197. Wenusch, A.: Über die Bestimmung des Nikotins im Tabakrauch [The determination of nicotine in tobacco smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 74 (1937) 46–51. 4198. Wenusch, A.: Über den Einfluss der Schnittbreite auf den Übergang des Nikotins in den Hauptstromrauch [The Influence of cut width on the passage of nicotine into mainstream smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 75 (1937) 182–184. 4199. Wenusch, A.: Über das Auftreten von Lävoglukosan im Tabakrauch [The occurrence of levoglucosan in tobacco smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1938(2) 4-5, see Chem. Abstr. 35 (1941) 4157. 4200. Wenusch, A.: Reduktionsvermögen des Hauptstromrauches vor and nach der Hydrolyse [Reducing activity of mainstream smoke before and after hydrolysis]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1938(2) 10–11. 4201. Wenusch, A.: Der Tabakrauch [Tobacco smoke]; Geist, Bremen, Germany (1939). 4202. Wenusch, A.: Über die Zusammensetzung des Tabakrauches [On the composition of tobacco smoke]; Österr. Chem. Z. 42 (1939) 226–231, see Chem. Abstr. 33 (1939) 6524. 4203. Wenusch, A.: Über die Nikotinaufnahme beim Tabakrauchen [Nicotine assimilation by tobacco smoking]; Med. Klin. 36 (1940) 1159–1161. 4204. Wenusch, A.: Tabakuntersuchungen. V. Der Einfluss der Wärmefermentation auf den “Nikotinschub” [Tobacco investigations. V. The influence of warm fermentation on “nikotinschub”]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 79 (1940) 265–267. 4205. Wenusch, A.: Letzte Forschungsergebnisse über Tabak, Tabakrauch und die Nikotinadsorption beim Tabakrauchen [Latest research results on tobacco, tobacco smoke, and nicotine absorption from tobacco smoking]; Österr. Chem. Z. 44 (1941) 228-–233. 4206. Wenusch, A.: Über die absoluten Nikotinmengen, die während des Rauchens aufgenommen werden [Absolute amounts of nicotine ingested during tobacco smoking]; Forschung. Fortschritte 18 (1942) 77–78. 4207. Wenusch, A.: Untersuchungen über die Nikotinbildung in der Tabakpflanze [Investigation of nicotine formation in the tobacco plant]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 88 (1948) 629-633, see Chem. Abstr. 43 (1949) 4345. 4208. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Zusammensetzung des Zigarrenrauches [Contribution to the knowledge of cigar smoke]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1933(2) 15–19.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4209. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Myosmine and Sokratine [Myosmine and socratine]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1934(1) 5–9. 4210. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Über den Nachweis von Nebenalkaloiden im Tabak und Tabakrauch. Teil I [The detection of minor alkaloids in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Part I]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1935(1) 11. 4211. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Über den Nachweis von Nebenalkaloiden im Tabak und Tabakrauch. Teil II [The detection of minor alkaloids in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Part II]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1935(3) 2–7. 4212. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Carbon monoxide from tobacco smoke causes no rise in blood pressure; Med. Klin. 31 (1935) 554. 4213. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Über das Schicksal des Nikotins beim Rauchen. Abbauprodukte des Nikotins [The fate of nicotine during smoking. Degradation products of nicotine]; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 1936(1) 3–7. 4214. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Über die Menge wasserdampfflüchtigger Säuren und Basen der festflüssigen Bestandteile des Tabakrauches [Amount of steam-volatile acids and bases in the nonvolatile constituents of tobacco smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 74 (1937) 408–411. 4215. Wenusch, A. and R. Schöller: Zusammsetzung und Charakterisierung des gasförmigen Anteiles des Tabakrauches [Composition and characterization of the gaseous part (the dispersed phase) of tobacco smoke]; Z. Untersuch. Lebensm. 75 (1938) 346–353. 4216. Werle, E. and H. Schievelbein: Tabellen zur Toxicologie, Pharmakologie und Chemie von Inhaltsstoffen des Tabaks und des Tabakrauchs. I Mitteilung [Tables on the toxicology, pharmacology and chemistry of components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. I]; Arzneimittelforschung 11 (1961) 1011–1016. 4217. Werle, E. and H. Schievelbein: Tabellen zur Toxicologie, Pharmakologie und Chemie von Inhaltsstoffen des Tabaks und des Tabakrauchs. II Mitteilung [Tables on the toxicology, pharmacology and chemistry of components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. II]; Arzneimittelforschung 11 (1961) 1149–1157. 4218. Wernsman, E.A. and D.F. Matzinger: Time and site of nicotine conversion in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 226–228. 4219. Westcott, D.T.: Oxides of nitrogen in cigarette smoke; 18th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 18, Paper No. 23, 1964, p. 35. 4220. Westcott, D.T. and D. Spincer: The cadmium, nickel, and lead content of tobacco and cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1974) 217–221. 4220a. Westermark, T.: Gaseous ions and their possible role in the etiology of lung cancer and some obervations on free charges in cigarette smoke; Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 369 (1961) 119–120; Radical ions and other free charges in relation to the lung cancer problem; in: Swedish Cancer Society Yearbook for 1960–1962, 1963, pp. 196–198. 4221. Weston, T.J.: The effect of phenol binding polymers and detergents on the preparation of polyphenol oxidase and tyrase from tobacco leaf; Tob. Sci. 11 (1967) 155–158; Weston, T.J.: Studies on the synthesis of chlorogenic acid in tobacco leaves during flue-curing; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 82–85. 4222. Weybrew, J.A.: Estimation of the plastid pigments of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 1 (1957) 1–5. 4223. Weybrew, J.A. and L.A. Jones: The elaboration of carbonyls by tobacco during growth and flue-curing; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 164–166.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1428
11/24/08 2:40:03 PM
Bibliography
4224. Weybrew, J.A. and D.F. Matzinger: The free and protein-bound amino acids of certain Nicotiana species and hybrids; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 71–78. 4225. Weybrew, J.A. and R.L. Stephens: Survey of the carbonyl contents of tobacco; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 53–57. 4226. Weybrew, J.A., W.G. Woltz, and W.H. Johnson: Changes in the free amino acids of tobacco during curing; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 766–772. 4227. White, E.L., A. Sequeria, and C.O. Brooks: Ultrasensitive method for the direct determination of vinyl chloride in fresh mainstream vapor-phase cigarette smoke; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 49, 1997, pp. 54–55. 4228. White, E.L., M.S. Uhrig, T.J. Johnson, B.M. Gordon, R.D. Hicks, M.F. Borgerding, W.M. Coleman III, and J.F. Elder: Quantitative determination of selected compounds in a Kentucky 1R4F Reference Cigarette smoked using multidimensional gas chromatography and selected ion-monitoring mass spectrometry; 36th ASMS Conf. on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, 1988, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511654990 -5034, 521079872 -9917, 523055024 -5051; Quantitative determination of selected compounds in Kentucky 1R4F Reference Cigarette smoke by multidimensional gas chromatography and selected ion monitoring-mass spectrometry; J. Chromatog. Sci. 28 (1990) 393–399. 4229. White, R.T. Jr: Determination of twenty elements by inductively coupled argon plasma in smoke fractions collected from the 85-mm nonfiltered 1R1 Kentucky Reference Cigarette; RDM, 1984, No. 75, October 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 505122164 -2187. 4230. White, R.T. Jr: Elemental analysis of mainstream cigarette smoke; R&DM, 1991, No. 606; ACD-TRW No. 231, August 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508309185 -9190. 4231. Whitehead, J.K.: A study of carcinogenic components of cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., 40th Ann. Rpt. (1962). 4232. Whitehead, J.K.: Some chemical aspects of smoking and health; Chem. Soc. Mtg., London, England, see abstr. in Chem. and Ind. (London) (1965) 1222–1223. 4233. Whitehead, J.K. and P. Dickens: A study of carcinogenic components of cigarette smoke; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., 41st Ann. Rpt., Pt. II (1963) 26–27. 4234. Whitehead, J.K. and K. Rothwell: The mouse skin carcinogenicity of cigarette smoke condensate fractionated by solvent partition methods; Brit. J. Cancer 23 (1969) 840. 4235. Wickham, J.E., H.C. Holmes, and J.J. Westbrook: A study of the reducing substances in cigarette smoke; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 10, 1960, p. 8; Wickham, J.E., J.J. Westbrook , and H.C. Holmes: Automated colorimetric analysis of reducing substances in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 50–52. 4236. Wiernik, A., A. Christakopoulos, L. Johansson, and I. Walhberg: Effect of air-curing on the chemical composition of tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 21 (1995) 39–80. 4237. Wierzba, M.: Determination of the chemical and physical properties of Polish, U.S., and other burley-type leaf tobaccos and evaluation of their suitability to absorb casing materials; Biul. Cent. Lab. Przemyslu Tytoniowego 1963(No.1–2) (1963) 67–72. 4238. Wierzba, M.: Chemical composition of some American tobaccos; Biul. Cent. Lab. Przemyslu Tytoniowego 1964(No. 3–4) (1964) 82–85.
1429
4239. Wierzba, M.: Chemical composition of some U.S. tobaccos; Wiadomosci Tytoniowa 8(10) (1964) 159–160. 4240. Wieske, R.: Zur Beurteilung von Filterzigaretten [On the evaluation of filter cigarettes]; Z. Lebensm. Untersuch. Forsch. 102 (1955) 123–127. 4241. Wieske,R.:UntersuchungenübercancerogeneBestandteile im Tabakrauch [Investigations of the carcinogenic components in tobacco smoke]; Arzneimittelforschung 7 (1957) 324–329. 4241a. Willers S., A. Schutz, R. Attewell, and S. Skerfving: Relation between lead and cadmium in blood and involuntary smoking of children; Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 14 (1988) 385–389. 4242. Williams, E.C.: The determination of arsenic and some other inorganic constituents of cigarette smoke; Thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC (1955) pp. 1–44. 4243. Williams, J.F. and R.G. Garmon: Beryllium in cigarette tobacco; Tob. Sci. 5 (1961) 25–27. 4244. Williams, J.F. and B.H. Gerritsen: Changes in amino acid content of flue-cured tobacco during aging; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 243–247. 4245. Williams, J.F. and G.F. Hunt: Ammonia in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 24, 1967, p. 14. 4246. Williams, J.F. and M.T. McRae: Fate of cigarette sulfur on smoking; 21st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 21, Paper No. 16, 1967, p. 10. 4247. Williams, J.R.: Method of treating tobacco to reduce nitrosamine content, and produce products thereby; U.S. Patent 6,202,649 (2001) March 20. 4247a. Williams, P.T., K.D. Bartle, and G.E. Andrews: The relation between polycyclic aromatic compounds in diesel fuel and exhaust particulates; Fuel 65 (1986) 1150–1158. 4248. Williams, R., C. Sparacino, B. Petersen, J. Bumgarner, R.H. Jungers, and J. Lewtas: Comparative characterization of organic emissions from diesel particles, coke oven mains, roofing tar vapors and cigarette smoke condensate; Internat. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 26 (1986) 27–49. 4249. Williams, R.W. and Science Information Division, Research and Development: Constituents reported in tobacco and tobacco smoke; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, WinstonSalem, NC, 1997, pp. 1–134; In-house data base for chemical compounds isolated from tobacco and tobacco smoke/ aerosol; R&DM, 1989, No. 30, February 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508885321 -5341, see also www.rjrtdocs.com 517550972 -1193, see also http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ aqf91c00; Chemical compounds isolated from tobacco and tobacco smoke/aerosol. II. CHEM database system modifications; R&DM, 1990, No. 9, January 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508381184 -1197. 4250. Williams, T.B.: The determination of nitric oxide in gas phase cigarette smoke by non-dispersive infrared analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 10 (1980) 91–99. 4251. Williams, T.B. and C.W. Belk II: An infrared method for the determination of CO and CO2 levels in cigarette smoke; 24th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 24, Paper No. 11, 1970, p. 8; An infrared method for the determination of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide levels in cigarette smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 210–215. 4252. Williams, T.B. and C.W. Belk II: An infrared method for the determination of nitric oxide in cigarette smoke; 27th
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1429
11/24/08 2:40:03 PM
1430
4253.
4254.
4255.
4256.
4257.
4258.
4259.
4260.
4261.
4262.
4263.
4264.
4265.
4266.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 27, Paper No. 24. 1973, p. 19. Williamson, J.T.: A method of estimating smoke quantitatively by means of optical measurements on the aerosol itself; 14th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 21. 1960, p. 12. Williamson, J.T. and D.R. Allman: Vapour phase analysis of consecutive puffs during the smoking of a cigarette; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 28, 1963, pp. 19–20. Williamson, J.T. and D.R. Allman: Effects of filters on vapour phase composition of consecutive puffs during the smoking of a cigarette; CORESTA Inf. Bull. 1964(1) 7–17. Williamson, J.T. and D.R. Allman: Die Wirkung von Cigarettenfiltern auf die Bestandteile der Dampfphase [Action of cigarette filters on the composition of the vapor phase]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 2 (1964) 263–269. Williamson, J.T. and D.R. Allman: The distribution of tobacco smoke constituents between the vapor and particulate phases; Proc. 4th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Athens, Greece, 1966 (1967) 1093–1101; The distribution of tobacco smoke constituents between the vapour and particulate phases; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1966) 590–596. Williamson, J.T., D.R. Allman, and K.G. Houlan: Measurement of the adsorption of isoprene and acetaldehyde by some common adsorbents; 16th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 16, Paper No. 19, 1962, pp. 12–13. Williamson, J.T., J.F. Graham, and D.R. Allman: The modification of cigarette smoke by filter tips; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 3 (1965) 233–242. Williamson, J.T., J.F. Graham, and D.R. Allman: Effect on cigarette smoke composition of type and sequence of additives in multiple filters; Combined CORESTA/26th TCRC, Williamsburg, VA: Paper No. 83 (1972). Williamson, R.E. and J.F. Chaplin: Levels of chemical constituents in cured leaves of four burley tobacco cultivars according to stalk position; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 75–78. Williamson, R.E. and W.J. Johnson: Chemical and physical characteristics of freeze-dried tobacco stalk and midrib; Tob. Sci. 25 (1981) 61–63. Williamson, R.E., J.F. Chaplin, and W.F. McClure: Nearinfrared spectrometry of tobacco leaf for estimating tar yield of smoke; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 49, 1986, p. 26; Near-infrared spectrometry of tobacco leaf for estimating total particulate matter yield of smoke; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: Paper ST15, 107–108. Williamson, R.E., J.F. Chaplin, and H.W. Spurr Jr: Chemical analysis of tobaccos varying in tar and nicotine content; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 14, 1975, p. 15. Williamson, T.G., A.S. Chiang, R.W. Jenkins Jr, G.E. Lester, and R.H. Newman: A material balance of selected elements in cigarette smoke; Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 18 (1974) 64–65. Williamson, T.G., R.W. Jenkins Jr, R.H. Newman, and R.D. Carpenter: Analysis of tobacco and tobacco smoke by neutron activation; Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 12 (1971) 110–111.
4266a. Willits, C.O.: Determination of nicotine by ultraviolet absorption; 2nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 2, Paper No. 5, 1948. 4267. Willits, C.O., M.L. Swain, J.A. Connelly, and B.A. Brice: Spectrophotometric determination of nicotine; Anal. Chem. 22 (1950) 430–433. 4268. Wilson, S.A.: Determination of the selective removal of phenolic compounds by cigarette filters using highperformance liquid chromatography; 48th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 48, Paper No. 19, 1994, p. 34. 4269. Winkler, B.C., W.J. Dunlap, J.W. Mizelle, L.M. Rohrbaugh, and S.H. Wender: Quantitative analysis of scopolin and scopoletin in tobacco plants treated with maleic hydrazide; Tob. Sci. 13 (1969) 19–20. 4269a. Winter, D., M. Cashmore, M. Coleman, G. Errington, and P. White: The application of a two level factorial design to the selective reduction of phenolic compounds in mainstream smoke using cellulose acetate filters; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 46, 2006, p. 45. 4270. Wise, M.B. and M.R. Guerin: Analysis of tobacco smoke tar using Fourier transform mass spectrometry; 40th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 40, Paper No. 60, 1986, p. 33. 4271. Wise, M.B. and M.R. Guerin: Characterization of higher molecular weight constituents in tobacco smoke tars using Fourier transform mass spectrometry; 41st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 41, Paper No. 49, 1987, p. 37. 4271a. Wittekind, W.: Recommended plant protection agents: Current strategies in 22 important tobacco exporting countries; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 271–280. 4272. Wochnowski, W.F.K.: Different methods of measuring tobacco moisture; CORESTA 1982 Symp., WinstonSalem, NC, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1982: Paper T07, 30, see rjrtdocs. com 509247422 -7450, 509804527 -4574; Tabak J. Int. 2 (1983) 106–114. 4273. Wolff, W.A., E.G. Purdom and J.A. Isenhower: The use of radioisotopes as tracers in cigarette smoke; North Carolina Med. J. 15 (1954) 159–163; Radioisotopes as tracers in cigarette smoke; Fed. Proc. 13 (1954). 4273a. Woloshuk, C.P., L.S. Melchers, B.J. Cornelissen, M. Clemens, E.J.S. Meulenhoff, and P.J.M. Van Den Elzen: Antifungal preparations containing osmotin; U.S. Patent No. 5,856,151 (January 5, 1999). 4274. Wood, W., G.L. Dooly, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Transfer of maleic hydrazide into mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 325–330. 4275. Woodlief, W.G., J.J. Lam Jr, J.F. Chaplin, W.S. Schlotzhauer, and R.F. Severson: Deproteinization effects on homogenized leaf cured (HLC) products; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984), 211–217. 4275a. Woodward, C.F., F.A. Eisner, and P.G. Haines: Pyrolysis of nicotine to myosmine; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 66 (1944) 911–914. 4276. Woollen, B.H., W.J. Irvine, P.W. Brown, and D.H. Jones: A thin-layer chromatographic method for tobacco lipid analysis; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 101–103. 4277. Wooten, J.B., G. Chan, and M.R. Hajaligol: Free radicals in cigarette smoke; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 91, 2001, p. 73. 4278. VOID
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1430
11/24/08 2:40:04 PM
Bibliography
4279. Wooten, J.B., R. Sharma, and M.R. Hajaligol: Characterization of pyrolyzed tobacco and tobacco components by 13C CPMAS NMR and FTIR; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 48, 2000, pp. 46–47. 4279a. World Health Organization: Advancing knowledge regulating tobacco products; Monograph (2000) 1–120. 4280. Woziwodski, H. and D. Hoffmann: Free higher fatty acids in tobacco and tobacco smoke; 20th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 20, Paper No. 16, 1966, pp. 19–21. 4281. Wright, G.F: Studies with tobacco smoke condensate; in: Proc. 3rd Natl. Cancer Conf., June, 1956, JB Lippincott Company (1957) 479–484. 4282. Wright, G.F: Personal communication; see Rodgman, A.: Tobacco tar fractionation and the pretreatment of tobacco: A conversation with Dr. George F Wright of the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; RDM, 1957, No. 25, July 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610651 -0656. 4282a. Wright, G.F: Statement on lung cancer-cigarette smoking controversy: Chemical fractionation of cigarette smoke condensate; in: False and Misleading Advertising (FilterTip Cigarettes), reported by E.L. Wynder at the Hearing before Subcommittee on Government Operations (the Blatnik Hearings on Filtered Cigarettes) (July 1957). 4283. Wright, G.F and E.L. Wynder: Fractionation of cigarette tar; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(1) (1955) 55. 4284. Wright, G.F and E.L. Wynder: Further chemical studies of cigarette smoke condensate; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(2) (1956) 159. 4285. Wright, G.R. and R.J. Shephard: Carbon monoxide, nicotine and the safer cigarette; Respiration 35 (1978) 40–52. 4286. Wright, H.E. Jr, H.H. Burton, and R.C. Berry Jr: Some colorless polyenes of aged burley tobacco; 37th Ann. Mtg. Virginia Acad Sci., see abstract in Virginia Sci. J. 10 (1959) 271; Carotenoids and related colorless polyenes of aged burley tobacco; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82 (1959) 107–116. 4287. Wu, G.N., S.J. Sheen, and J.L. Hamilton: Preparation of some chemical and physical properties of proteases in tobacco leaves; Tob. Sci. 28 (1984) 41–45. 4288. Wu, M., D. Li, M.Y. Zhao, Q. Xia, and F. Wang: The analysis of volatile aldehydes in mainstream smoke of cigarettes by gas chromatography; 54th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 54, Paper No. 50, 2000, p. 47–48. 4289. Wu, Z., W.W. Weeks, and R.C. Long: The contributions of neutral volatiles to smoking flavor of tobacco; 43rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 43, Paper No. 7, 1989, p. 17. 4290. Wujciak, D.W.: Evaluation of carbon in cigarette filters. A. Gas phase analysis. Seminar by Celanese Corp. of America R&D personnel to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R&D personnel (1964). 4291. Wulfert, K.: The determination of nicotine in the smoke of Norwegian and foreign tobaccos; Tidsskr. Kjemi, Bergvesen 14 (1934) 128–131; Tidsskr. Kjemi, Bergvesen 14 (1934) 140–143. 4292. Wynder, E.L.: The place of tobacco in the etiology of lung cancer; Connecticut Med. J. 18 (1954) 321–330. 4293. Wynder, E.L. (Editor): The biologic effects of tobacco: With special emphasis on the clinical and experimental aspects; Little, Brown & Co., Boston, MA (1955).
1431
4294. Wynder, E.L.: Human and experimental relation of tobacco and cancer; Tob. Symp., Long Island Subsection, Am. Chem. Soc. (1956), see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1956, No. 9, March 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504913146 -3153. 4295. Wynder, E.L.: Environmental causes of cancer in man; Med. Clin. N. America (1956) 629–645. 4296. Wynder, E.L.: Statement on the lung cancer-cigarette smoking controversy: Chemical fractionation of cigarette smoke; in: False and misleading advertising (Filter-tip cigarettes), Hearing before Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations (the Blatnik Hearings on Filtered Cigarettes), House of Representatives, 85th Congress, 1st Session (1957) 63–114. 4297. Wynder, E.L.: Towards a solution of the tobacco-cancer problem; Brit. Med. J. 1957(i) 1–3. 4298. Wynder, E.L.: Carcinogens in tobacco; Brit. Med. J. 1957(i) 892. 4299. Wynder, E.L.: Laboratory contributions to the tobaccocancer problem; Brit. Med. J. 1959(i) 317–322. 4300. Wynder, E.L.: Laboratory contributions to the tobaccocancer problem; Symposium on Chemical and biological problems related to smoking, Stockholm, Sweden (1960); Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 369 (1961) 63–101. 4301. Wynder, E.L.: Studies in tobacco carcinogenesis; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 5(1) (1964) 70, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1964, No. 52, May 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504913254 -3275. 4302. Wynder, E.L.: Some concepts of the less harmful cigarette; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) 3–12. 4303. Wynder, E.L., L. Fritz, and N. Furth: Effect of concentration of benzopyrene in skin carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 19 (1957) 361–370. 4304. Wynder, E.L., D.A. Goodman, and D. Hoffmann: Ciliatoxic components in cigarette smoke. II. Carboxylic acids and aldehydes; Cancer 18 (1965) 505–509. 4305. Wynder, E.L., D.A. Goodman, and D. Hoffmann: Ciliatoxic components in cigarette smoke. III. in vitro comparison of different smoke components; Cancer 18 (1965) 1652–1658. 4306. Wynder, E.L., S. Gottlieb, and G.F Wright: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. IV. Different tobacco types; Cancer 10 (1957) 1206–1209. 4306a. Wynder, E.L., E.A. Graham, and A.B. Croninger: Study on the experimental production of cancer with tobacco tar; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1 (1953) 62–63; Experimental production of carcinoma with cigarette tar; Cancer Res. 13 (1953) 855–864. 4306b. Wynder, E.L. and E.A. Graham: Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma: A study of 684 cases; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 143 (1950) 329–336. 4306c. Wynder, E.L., E.A. Graham, and A.B. Croninger: Experimental production of carcinoma with cigarette tar. II. Tests with different mouse strains; Cancer Res. 15 (1955) 445–448. 4306d. Wynder, E.L. and S.S. Hecht (Editors): Lung cancer; UICC Tech. Rept. Series 25 (1976) 138. 4307. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: The role of higher polycyclic hydrocarbons in tobacco carcinogenesis; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 3(1) (1959) 74, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1959, No. 41, April 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1431
11/24/08 2:40:04 PM
1432
4308. 4309.
4310.
4311.
4312.
4313.
4314.
4315.
4316.
4317.
4318.
4319. 4320.
4321.
4322.
4323.
4324.
4325.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
501009779 -9792, 504913174 -3187; A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. VII. The role of higher polycyclic hydrocarbons; Cancer 12 (1959) 1079–1086. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: The carcinogenicity of benzofluoranthenes; Cancer 12 (1959) 1194–1199. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Studies in tobacco carcinogenesis; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 3(2) (1960) 164, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1960, No. 32, April 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 502816003 -6012, 504913196 -3206. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Some practical aspects of the smoking-cancer problem; New Engl. J. Med. 262 (1960) 540–545. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Biological and chemical studies of tobacco smoke condensate; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 3(3) (1961) 280, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1961, No. 35, April 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504913207 -3220. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Present status of laboratory studies on tobacco carcinogenesis; Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 52 (1961) 119–132. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. VIII. The role of the acidic fractions as promoters; Cancer 14 (1961) 1306–1315. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Studies with the gaseous and particulate phase of tobacco smoke; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 3(4) (1962) 373, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1962, No. 41, May 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500601317 -1328. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: A study of air pollution carcinogenesis. III. Carcinogenic activity of gasoline engine exhaust condensate; Cancer 15 (1962) 103–108. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Bioassays on the carcinogenicity of tobacco smoke condensate and air pollutants; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 4(1) (1963) 73, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1963, No. 44, June 7, see www. rjrtdocs.com 504913230 -3249. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Ein experimenteller Beitrag zur Tabakrauchkanzerogenese [An experimental contribution to tobacco smoke carcinogenesis]; Deut. Med. Wchnschr. 88 (1963) 623–628. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Unpublished 1963 results described in: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann, Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) 234–236. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 330–331. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 398–418, Table II, Part 1. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 294–295. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res 8 (1964) 249–453, see p. 315. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 316–317. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see p. 318.
4326. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 323–326. 4327. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 331–333. 4328. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see p. 378. 4329. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res 8 (1964) 249–453, see p. 393. 4329a. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Unpublished 1963 results described in: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Adv. Cancer Res. 8 (1964) 249–453, see pp. 331–333. Also in: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see pp. 372–374. 4330. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Reduction of tumorigenicity of cigarette smoke. An experimental approach; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 192 (1965) 88–94. 4331. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Current concepts of environmental cancer research; Med. Clin. North Am. 50 (1966) 631–645. 4332. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967). 4333. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see pp. 370–371. 4334. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see pp. 268– 295, Table VII.3, Part 1. 4335. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see p. 334. 4336. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see p. 380. 4337. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see pp. 415, 480–482. 4338. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see pp. 517–518. 4339. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see p. 532. 4340 Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see pp. 625–626. 4341 Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967), see p. 636. 4342. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Science 162 (1968) 862–871. 4343. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann (Editors): Toward a less harmful cigarette; Natl. Cancer Inst. Monograph 28 (1968). 4343a. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Selected laboratory methods in tobacco carcinogenesis; in: Methods in cancer research. Vol. 4, edited by H. Busch, Academic Press, New York, NY (1968) pp. 3–52.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1432
11/24/08 2:40:04 PM
1433
Bibliography
4344. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. X. Tumor promoting activity; Cancer 24 (1969) 289–301. 4345. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Science 165 (1969) 312–313. 4346. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Bioassays in tobacco carcinogenesis; Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 11 (1969) 163–193. 4346a. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: The epidermis and the respiratory tract as bioassay systems in tobacco carcinogenesis; Brit. J. Cancer 24 (1970) 574–587. 4347. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Respiratory carcinogenesis; in: Chemical carcinogens, 1st Edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 173 (1976) 324–365. 4348. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and health: A societal challenge; New Engl. J. Med. 300 (1979) 894–903; for a preliminary manuscript of the article that was eventually published, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501526036 -6067. 4348a. Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco; Chapter 15 in: Cancer epidemiology and prevention, edited by D. Schottenfeld and J.J.F. Fraumeni, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA (1982) 277–292. 4349. Wynder, E.L., D. Hoffmann, and O. Auerbach: The role of particulate and volatile components in tobacco carcinogenesis; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 6 (1965) 69. 4350. Wynder, E.L., H.E. Kaiser, D.A. Goodman, and D. Hoffmann: A method for determining ciliastatic components in cigarette smoke; Cancer 16 (1963) 1222–1225. 4351. Wynder, E.L., P. Kopf, and H. Ziegler: Dose response with cigarette tar; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(3) (1957) 261; A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. II. Dose response studies; Cancer 10 (1957) 1193–1200. 4352. Wynder, E.L. and J. Mann: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. III. Filtered cigarettes; Cancer 10 (1957) 1201–1205. 4353. Wynder, E.L. and G.F Wright: Studies on the identification of carcinogens in cigarette tar; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(2) (1956) 159. 4354. Wynder, E.L. and G.F Wright: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. I. The primary fractions; Cancer 10 (1957) 255–271. 4355. Wynder, E.L., G.F Wright, and J. Lam: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. V. The role of pyrolysis; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2(4) (1958) 357–358, see Rodgman, A.: RDM, 1958, No. 38, April 25, www.rjrtdocs.com. 501009759 -9774; Cancer 11 (1958) 1140–1148. 4356. Wynder, E.L., G.F Wright, and J. Lam: A study of tobacco carcinogenesis. VI. The role of precursors; Cancer 12 (1959) 1073–1078. 4357. Wyttenbach, A., S. Bajo, and A. Haekkinen: Determination of 16 elements in tobacco by neutron activation analysis; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 8 (1976) 247–249. 4358. Xia Jianping, Xu Qixin, and Sun Ruishen: Determination of the transfer rate of a bicyclo alkene from a blended cigarette into smoke; 9th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Guangzhou, China, 1988, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1988: Paper S-i, 176. 4359. Xie F, B. Liu, and M. Zhao: Determination of the free amino acids in tobaccos by RP-HPLC with OPA precolumn derivatization and fluorescence detection; 50th
4359a.
4360.
4360a. 4361.
4361a.
4361b.
4362.
4363.
4364.
4365.
4365a.
4366.
4366a.
4367.
Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 50, Paper No. 43, 1996, p. 45. Xioa, L., Y. Yang, Z. Ren-Feng, and C. Ling: Sun-cured tobacco extracts compensate in the low tar cigarette aroma application; see http://www.tobacco.org.cn/news/ dspNews.jsp?id=49008. Xue, L., C.E. Thomas, and K.B. Koller: Mainstream smoke gas phase filtration performance of adsorption materials evaluated with a puff-by-puff multiplex GC-MS method; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2003) 251–256. Yamafuji, K.: Two new glucosides from tobacco leaves; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. 8 (1932) 404–410. Yamagiwa, K.: Collected papers on artificial production of cancer; Maruzen Company Ltd., Tokyo, Japan (1965); Yamagiwa, K. and K. Ichikawa: Experimentelle Studie über die Pathogenese der Epitheliengeschwülste [Experimental study of the pathogenesis of epithelial tumors]; Tokyo Igakkai Zassi 15 (1915) 295-344; Experimental study of the pathogenesis of carcinomas; J. Cancer Res. 3 (1918) 1–29. Yamaguchi, K., K. Shudo, T. Okamoto, T. Sugimura, and T. Kosuge: Presence of 2-aminodipyrido[1,2a:3’,2’-d]imidazole in broiled cuttlefish; Gann 71 (1980) 743–744. Yamaizumi, S., T. Siomi, H. Kasai, S. Nishimura, Y. Takahashi, M. Nagao, and T. Sugimura: Detection of potent mutagens, Trp-P-1 and Trp-P-2, in broiled fish; Cancer Lett. 12 (1981) 105–110. Yamamoto, K. and M. Noguchi: Isolation of sugar compounds of asparagine, phenylalanine, tyrosine and valine from cured tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 37 (1973) 2185–2187. Yamamoto, T., U. Anzai, and T. Okada: Effect of cigarette circumference on weight loss during puffs and total delivery of tar and nicotine; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 259–267. Yamamoto, T., Y. Suga, K. Kaneki, and H. Kaneko: Effect of chemical constituents on formation rates of carbon monoxide of bright tobacco; CORESTA 1986 Symp., Taormina, Italy, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1986: Paper ST05, 102; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1986) 163–170. Yamamoto, T., Y. Suga, C. Tokura, T. Toda, and T. Okada: Effect of cigarette circumference on formation rates of various components in mainstream smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1985) 81–87. Yamamoto, T., K. Tsuji, T. Kosuge, T. Okamoto, K. Shudo, K. Takeda, Y. Iitaka, K. Yamaguchi, Y. Seino, T. Yahagi, M. Nagao, and T. Sugimura: Isolation and structure determination of mutagenic substances in L-glutamic acid pyrolysate; Proc. Japan Acad. 54B (1978) 248–250. Yamamoto, T., S. Umemura, and H. Kaneko: Effect of exogenous potassium on the reduction in tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide deliveries in the mainstream smoke of cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 14 (1990) 379–385. Yamamoto, Y., H. Tsuji, N. Hayashida, K. Inoue, and J. Obokata: Nucleotide sequence of cDNA clones encoding PSI-D2 protein of photosystem I in Nicotiana sylvestris; Plant Mol. Biol. 17 (1991) 1251–1254. Yamashita, M., K. Wakabayashi, M. Nagao, S. Sato, and N. Kinae: Amounts of heterocyclic amines in the
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1433
11/24/08 2:40:04 PM
1434
4368.
4369.
4370.
4370a.
4371.
4372.
4373.
4374.
4375.
4376.
4377.
4378.
4379.
4380.
4381.
4382.
4382a.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
basic fraction of cigarette smoke condensates; Environ. Mutagen Soc. Japan Mtg., Akita, Japan (1985), see Abstr. in Mutation Res. 164 (1986) 286. Yamashita, M., K. Wakabayashi, M. Nagao, S. Sato, Z. Yamaizumi, M. Takahashi, N. Kinae, I. Tomita, and T. Sugimura: Detection of 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoline in cigarette smoke condensate; Gann 77 (1986) 419–422. Yamazaki, M. and S. Saito: The effect of physical properties of cigarettes on the content of carbonyl compounds in the mainstream smoke: Effect of moisture content and circumference; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 120 (1978) 15–21. Yamazaki, M., R. Tomimuro, and K. Mitsuhashi: Relation between stalk position of tobacco leaf and nicotine and tar contents in its smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 107 (1965) 193–196. Yamazoe, Y., K. Ishii, T. Kamataki, R. Kato, and T. Sugimura: Isolation and characterization of active metabolites of tryptophan pyrolysate mutagen, Trp-P-2, formed by rat liver microsomes; Chem.-Biol. Interact. 30 (1980) 125–138. Yang, C.-H.: A study of certain blue-fluorescent polyphenols in tobacco leaves, flowers, and cigarette smoke; Thesis, University of Oklahoma (1958) pp. 1–116. Yang, C.-H., W. Chorney, W. Dunlap, E.L. Murphy, Y. Nakagawa, N. Scully, R. Watanabe, and S.H. Wender: Paper chromatographic determination of rutin in tobacco; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 238–242. Yang, C.-H., Y. Nakagawa, and S.H. Wender: Identification of scopoletin in cigarette smoke and tobacco; J. Org. Chem. 23 (1958) 204–205. Yang, C.-H., Y. Nakagawa, and S.H. Wender: Quantitative studies of scopoletin in cigarette smoke and tobacco; Anal. Chem. 30 (1958) 2041–2044. Yang, C.-H., Y. Nakagawa, and S.H. Wender: Scopoletin in commercial tobacco products; Tob. Sci. 2 (1958) 111–114. Yang, C.-H., Y. Nakagawa, and S.H. Wender: Identification of caffeic acid in cigarette smoke; Org. Chem. 25 (1960) 658–660. Yang, C.-H. and S.H. Wender: Free phenolic acids in cigarette smoke and tobacco. Paper chromatography: separation and identification; J. Chromatography 8 (1962) 82–89. Yang, C.-H. and S.H. Wender: Identification of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and protocatechuic aldehyde in cigarette smoke; Tob. Sci. 6 (1962) 158–161. Yang, C.-H. and S.H. Wender: Identification of aromatic aldehydes in cigarette smoke and in tobacco; Phytochemistry 3 (1964) 17–22. Yang, H., J. Liu, K. Li, X. Yin, X. Tan, and J. Wang; Synthesis of 3-oxo-A-ionol ethyl carbonate and its conversion to megastigmatrienones in tobacco smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2001) 339–343. Yang, M.H., S.J. Yeh, and S.F. Lai: Multi-element determination in tobacco leaves by instrumental neutronactivation analysis; Radioisotopes (Tokyo) 27 (1973) 118–123, Anal. Abstr. 27 (1974) 1484. Yasamatsu, N., M. Eda, Y. Tsujino, and M. Noguchi: Isolation of oxygenated derivatives of solanesol from burley tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 1757–1763. Yasuda, T., Z. Yamaizumi, S. Nishimura, M. Nagao, Y. Takahashi, J. Fujiki, T. Sugimura, and K. Tsuji:
4383.
4384.
4384a.
4385.
4386.
4387.
4387a.
4387b.
4388.
4389.
4389a.
4390.
4391.
4392.
4392a.
Detection of comutagenic compounds, harman and norharman, in pyrolysis products of proteins and food by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Proc. 37th Ann. Mtg., Japan Cancer Assoc. (1978) 21. Yavin, A.I., G. de Pasquali, and P. Baron: Polonium in cigarettes - spectroscopic analysis; Nature 205 (1965) 899–900. Yeager, D.W., J. Cholak, and B.G. Meiners: The determination of cadmium in biological and related material by atomic absorption; Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 34 (1973) 450–454. Yee, S.F.: In vitro inflammatory effects of nicotine and tobacco specific nitrosamine on human lung alveolar cell line A549; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 75, 2005, p. 60. Yoshida, D.: Determination of nicotine in the sidestream of cigarette smoke; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 118 (1976) 203–206. Yoshida, D. and Y. Fukuhara: Mutagenicity and co-mutagenicity of catechol on Salmonella; Mutation Res. 120 (1983) 7–11. Yoshida, D. and A. Hirato: Effects of cultural practices on the tar content in the smoke of cigarettes. V. Effect of flue- and air-curing on the tar content in smoke; Hatano Tabako Shikenjo Hokoku 67 (1970) 97–104. Yoshida, D. and T. Matsumoto: Isolation of 2-amino-9Hpyrido[2,3-b]indole and 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido [2,3-b]indole as pyrolysis products of tryptophan; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 1155–1156. Yoshida, D. and T. Matsumoto: Changes in mutagenicity of protein pyrolyzates by reaction with nitrite; Mutation Res. 58 (1978) 35–40. Yoshida, D. and T. Matsumoto: Amino-A-carbolines as mutagenic agents in cigarette smoke condensate; Cancer Lett. 10 (1980) 141–149. Yoshida, D, T. Matsumoto, and H. Okamoto: Interaction between amino-A-carboline and amino-B-carboline on mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium; Mutation Res. 68 (1979) 175–178. Yoshida, D, T. Matsumoto, R. Yoshimura, and T. Matsuzaki: Mutagenicity of amino-A-carbolines in pyrolysis products of soybean globulin; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 83 (1978) 915–920. Yoshida, D., H. Nishigata, and T. Matsumoto: Pyrolysis yields of 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole and 3-amino1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole as mutagens from proteins; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 1769–1770. Yoshida, D., Y. Suga, and H. Nishigata: Factors on the reduction of CO in the mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 17, 1979, p. 9. Yoshida, S., W. Tarora, R. Miyoshi, K. Torikai, and H. Takahashi: The effect of nitrogenous compounds on the generation of smoke constituents during tobacco pyrolysis; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 54, 2003, pp. 53–54. Yoshida, S., K. Torikai, H. Muto, M. Yajima, and Y. Shibuya: Effects of selective removal of tobacco components on the generation of cigarette smoke constituents; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 95, 2005, p. 71.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1434
11/24/08 2:40:04 PM
1435
Bibliography
4393. Young, G.W.: Mass spectrometric analysis of cigarette smoke. Part II. Determination of acetylene, ethylene, and ethane; RDR, 1965, No. 42, September 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966253 -6258. 4394. Young, G.W.: Mass spectrometric analysis of cigarette smoke. Part III. Determination of acetaldehyde, propane, propylene, and acetonitrile; RDR, 1967, No. 15, May 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500967909 -7920. 4395. Young, G.W. and D.L. Drummond: Mass spectrometric analysis of cigarette smoke. Part I. Determination of methyl chloride and carbonyl sulfide; RDR, 1965, No. 15, May 5, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500965802 -5807. 4396. Young, H.J.: Reconstituted sheet made from cigarette dust. The use of tobacco pectin for production of reconstituted tobacco products; R&DM, 1988, No. 280, October 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509545104 -5118. 4397. Young, H.J., E. Bernasek, and J.C. Leffingwell: Fatty acids for controlling harshness and cellulosic taste in tobacco products: Myristic acid and the like; RDM, 1972, No. 18, April 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500615482 -5484. 4398. Young, J.C., J.C. Robinson, and W.S. Rickert: A study of chemical deliveries as a function of cigarette butt length; 33rd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 33, Paper No. 19, 1979, p. 10; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 11 (1981) 87–95. 4398a. Yu, J., L.T. Taylor, J.A. Bodnar, and M.F. Borgerding: Influence of smoking conditions on nicotine fate in burning cigarettes; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 59, 2005, pp. 50–51. 4398b. Yunxia Wang, Y., K.M. Herrmann, S.C. Weller, and P.B. Goldsbrough: Cloning and nucleotide sequence of a complementary DNA encoding 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase from tobacco; Plant Physiol. 97 (1991) 847–848. 4398c. Zacharius, R. and W.E. Frankenburg: Some observations on proteins and amino acids in cigar tobacco leaves; 7th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 7, Paper No. 8, 1953, p. 5. 4398d. Zamorani, A., G. Roda, and G. Lanzarini: Research on pyrolysis of natural substances. I. Pyrolysis of pectin; Ind. Agr. 9 (1971) 35–41. 4399. Zane, A.: Determination of anthracene and pyrene in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 54–57. 4400. Zane, A.: Determination of phenanthrene in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography; Tob. Sci. 12 (1968) 77–80. 4401. Zane, A.: 4,8,13-Duvatrien-1-ol-3-one and 11-isopropyl-4,8-dimethyl-3,7,12-pentadecatriene-2,14-dione isomers from Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 12 (1973) 731–732. 4402. Zane, A., W. Steck, and S.H. Wender: Identification of 4-O-caffeoylquinic acid and related depsides in tobacco from cigarettes; Tob. Sci. 9 (1965) 85–87. 4403. Zane, A. and S.H. Wender: Pyrolysis products of rutin, quercetin, and chlorogenic acid; Tob. Sci. 7 (1963) 21–23. 4404. Zapior, B., J. Platek, and J. Kaleta: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the smoke of domestic Polish cigarette brands; Roczniki Chemii 33 (1959) 243–245. 4405. Zaridze, D.G., R.D. Safaev, G.A. Belitsky, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: Carcinogenic substances
4406.
4406a.
4407.
4408.
4409.
4410.
4410a.
4410b.
4410c.
4410d.
4411.
4412.
in Soviet tobacco products; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 85–488. Zeise, W.C.: Untersuchungen der bei der trockenen Destillation von Tabak entstehenden Produkte und der chemischen Verbindungen des Tabakrauches [Investigation of the products of dry distillation of tobacco and the chemical constituents of tobacco smoke]; Ann. Chem. Pharm. 47 (1843) 212–225. Zemann, A., C. Mair, and S. Praun: On-line puff-by-puff analysis of gaseous and Hoffmann analytes in cigarette smoke; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 36, 2005, p. 38. Zha, Q. and S.C. Moldoveanu: The influence of cigarette moisture to the chemistry of particulate phase smoke of common commercial cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 21 (2004) 184–191. Zha, Q., N. Qian, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of PAHs in particulate phase smoke using a GC high-resolution MS technique; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Greensboro NC, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 24, 2001, p. 34; J. Chromatogr. Sci. 40 (2002) 403–408. Zha, Q., E.M. Reddick, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sidestream cigarette smoke using a GC/MS technique; 56th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 56, Paper No. 62, 2002, pp. 57–58. Zhang, C., B. Wang, and J. Shi: Determination of benzo[a]pyrene in cigarette smoke total particulate matter by two-dimensional chromatography; 2002 CORESTA Congress, Paper ST 28. Zhang, G., Z. Hu, Z. Cao, G. Wang, Q. Zhao, X. Liu, and X. Cao: How many amendment doses decrease the tobacco adsorbing cadmium and lead from soils; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 44, 2006, p. 43. Zhang, J., C. Li, Z. Chen, Z. Rao, D. Wen, K. Li, and H. Liu: Metabolism study on tobacco specific N-nitrosamines in rabbit by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-electrospray interface-mass spectrometry method; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 53, 2006, p. 48. Zhang, L., K. Sannes, A.J. Shusterman, and C. Hansch: The structure-activity relationship of skin carcinogenicity of aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocycles; Chem.Biol. Interactions, 81 (1992) 149–180. Zhang, Y.: Studies of aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenicity; Master of Science Thesis, University of Texas El Paso, December, 1996, pp. 1–125. Zhangyu, C., L. Lili, and Y. Lijia: The study of pyrolysis of galactose, glucose, fructose, maltose, sucrose in air and helium with SPME and GC/MS; 55th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 55, Paper No. 61, 2001, p. 56. Zhangyu, C., M. Yiyuan, and Y. Weizu: Identification of tobacco smoke mainstream, using solid phase microextraction/capillary GC; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 10, 1997, p. 28.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1435
11/24/08 2:40:04 PM
1436
4413. Zhao, M, F. Xie, S. Wang, and D. Li: Determination of N-nitrosamines in tobacco by capillary gas chromatography; 2000 CORESTA Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 2000 Spec. Edition: Paper ST3, p. 147. 4414. Zhao, M. and F. Zhou: Analysis of phenolic constituents in the mainstream smoke of cigarettes by capillary column gas chromatography; CORESTA 1992 Symp., Jerez de la Frontera, Spain, CORESTA Inf. Bull., 1992 Spec. Edition: Paper ST7, 81. 4415. Zhou, J., K. Wu, Z. Qu, J. Liu, L. Lan, J. Cong, C. Wang, R. Bai, Y. Zhu, and X. Zhang: A systematic study of the free radicals in cigarette smoke: Determination; 58th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 58, Paper No.85, 2004, pp. 74–75. 4416. Zilkey, B.F.: Plant position analysis of variable leaf and smoke constituents of Ontario flue-cured tobacco; 26th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 26, Paper No. 10, 1972, pp. 14–16. 4417. Zilkey, B.F. and M.R. Binns: Effect of leaf ripeness and genotype on agronomic, physical and chemical measurements of flue-cured tobacco and tobacco smoke; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 11, 1980, p. 6. 4418. Zilkey, B.F., W.A. Court, M.R. Binns, E.K. Walker, V.A. Dirks, and P.K. Basrur: Studies on Canadian tobacco and tobacco smoke. 1. Tobacco, tobacco sheet and cigarette smoke. Chemical analyses on various treatments of bright and burley tobaccos; Tob. Sci. 26 (1982) 54–60. 4419. Zilkey, B.F., W.A. Court, E.K. Walker, and P.K. Basrur: Certain tobacco, tobacco sheet and cigarette smoke chemical and physical characteristics; 31st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 31, Paper No. 29, 1977, p. 15. 4420. Zimmerman, M.: Nicotine removal from burley tobacco by an ion exchange process; RDM, 1957, No. 15, May 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500610616 -0619. 4421. Zucker, M. and H.T. Stinson Jr: The role of chlorogenic acid and plastid pigments in the browning of variegated tobacco leaves; Tob. Sci. 4 (1960) 229–233. 4422*. Abdallah, F.: Burley blending, casing and toasting, a 2×2×2 factorial: Part 3. Comparative chemical studies; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 57, 2007, p. 50. 4423. Abrams, B.B.: Isoenzymes of acid phosphatase and nonspecific esterases in cultures of neoplastic and normal tobacco tissues; Differentiation 6 (1976) 53–58. 4424. Adedipe, M.O., R.A. Fletcher, and D.P. Ormrod: Ozone lesions in relation to senescence of attached and detached levels of tobacco; Atmos. Environ. 7 (1973) 357. 4425. Adler, R., R.L. Peck, and L. Thompson: Search for the cause of cigar butt odor; Cigar Manufacturers Assoc. Amer. Res. Prog. (1971). Also see Adler, R., R.L Peck, and L. Thompson: Chemistry of cigar butt odor. II. Further investigations on the distillable portion; Tob. Sci. 15 (1971) 121–123. 4426. Ahrans, J.F. and I. Zelitch: Chemical and enzymatic changes during curing of tobacco under controlled physical conditions; Cigar Manufacturers Assoc. Amer. Res. Prog. (1959). *
During the preparation of the text several hundred additional refrences were cited and are included here in alphabetical order from reference 4422 to 4989.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4427. Akaike, S.: Studies on the chemical constituents of tobacco plant. IV. Isolation of mesoinositol from fresh and flue-cured tobacco leaves; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 33 (1959) 670–671, see Chem. Abstr. 62 (1976) 6816c, see Tobacco Abstr. 3 (1959) 418. 4428. Akiyama, Y., S. Eda, M. Mori, and K. Kato: An arabinoglucuronomannan from extracellular polysaccharides of suspension-cultured tobacco cells; Agr. Biol. Chem. 48 (1984) 403–407. 4429. Akiyama, Y. and K. Kato: Structure of hydroxyprolinearabinoside from tobacco cells; Agr. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 79–81. 4430. Albo, J.P. and J. Chouteau: Characterization and evolution of chlorophyll pigments in dark tobacco during fermentation; Ann. Tabac SEITA 9(Sect.2) (1972) 209–223. 4431. Alcaide, A.M., M. Devys, J. Bottin, M. Fetizon, and M. Barbier: Biosynthesis of sterols in Nicotiana tabacum leaves particularly 24-methylene cholesterol and 24-methylene dihydrolanosterol; Phytochemistry 7 (1968) 1773–1777. 4432. Aleksandrov, K. and C. Frayssinet: Effect of cigarettesmoke condensate on the in vitro fixation of benzo[a] pyrene on DNA; Experientia 28 (1972) 932–933. 4433. Allegre Villanueva, J.V.: Extraction and bromatologicalindustrial study of the oil of tobacco seeds; Ann. Fac. Farm. Bio. Univ. San Marcos 8 (1960) 483. 4434. Amin, A.N.N.: Dynamic transformations of chemical constituents during flue-curing of Nicotiana tabacum; Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (1979). 4435. Amrhein, N.: Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in plants; Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 72 (1974) 249–261. 4436. Anastasov, A., T. Mileva, and N. Elkova: Chlororganic and dithiocarbamatic pesticides in the Bulgarian tobacco origins and cigarettes; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper S-18, pp 123–124. 4437. Anders, F. and F. Vester: Spontaneous, genetic tumors and amount of free amino acids in Nicotiana; Experientia 16 (1960) 65–67. 4438. Anderson, D.E.: Phosphoglycolate phosphatase and aconitase from tobacco leaves; Univ. Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI (1969) 1–408. 4438a. Anderson, R.A. and T.H. Vaughn: Coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols: Phenylpropanoid building of lignin in water extract of tobacco stalks; Am. Chem. Soc./C.S.J. Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii (1979). 4439. Anderson, R.C., A.G. Kelly, and J.S. Roberts: Two new acidic constituents of flue-cured Virginia tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 31 (1983) 458–459. 4440. Andreva, N.A.: Some data on folic acid metabolism in plants; Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 129 (1959) 278–280. 4441. Angelova, I.: Determining the auxin oxidase activity in green leaves of tobacco; Dokl. Bolg. Acad. Nauk. 25 (1972) 397–399. 4442. Antennas, Y., I. Cilia, and I. Harpaz: Species of RNA extracted from tobacco and datura plants and their differential sensitivity to actinomycin D; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 44 (1971) 78–88. 4443. Arnap, J., J. Bielawski, B.M. Dahlin, O. Dahlman, C.R. Enzell, and T. Petersson: Tobacco smoke chemistry. 2. Alkyl and alkenyl substituted guaiacols found
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1436
11/24/08 2:40:05 PM
Bibliography
4444.
4445.
4446.
4446a.
4447.
4448.
4449.
4450.
4451.
4452.
4453.
4454.
4455.
4456.
4457.
4458.
in cigarette smoke condensate; Acta Chem. Scand. B43 (1989) 44–50. Arrendale, R.F., L.B. Smith, and L.B. Rogers: Comparison of dynamically coated SE-54, SP-2250 and Carbowax 20M wall coated open tubular (WCOT) glass capillary columns, prepared after surface pretreatment with Superox TM-4 or with BaCO3; J. High Resol. Chrom. Commun. 3 (1980) 115–123. Arsenyan, E. and K. Paskaleva-Tomov: Composition of leaf pigments in Virginia bright tobacco and relation with quality of the leaves; Bulgar. Tyutyun 10 (1965) 37–40. Askew, H.O., R.J. Monk, J. Hodgeson, and G. Ward: Biochemical and physical changes in tobacco leaf during flue-curing; New Zealand J. Sci. Technol. 358 (1954) 344–363. Asmaev, P.G. and M.M. Makhina: Characteristic properties of pectolytic enzymes of tobacco; Tekhnol. Tabaka (1956) 25–30. Asmaev, P.G. and I.G. Mokhnachev: Separation and identification of keto acids in tobacco by paper chromatography; Izvest. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zaved. 5 (1960) 160–164. Asmaev, P.G. and I.G. Mokhnachev: Glycolic acid in tobacco; Izvest. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zaved. 5 (1961) 40–43. Atkinson, W.O.: Production of sample cigarettes for tobacco and health research; Proc. Univ. KY Tobacco Health Workshop Conf. (1970) 28–32. Audisio, S., N. Gagni, and D. Serafini Francassini: Polyamines during the in vitro growth of Nicotiana glauca habituated tissue; Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 77 (1976) 146–151. Badr, E.A.: Acid lability of nuclear DNA and its degree of binding to 3H-actinomycin D in meristematic and differentiated cells; Arch. Biol. 83 (1972) 11–20. Baebler, S.: Une methode de determination de l’activité des ferments proteolytique dans le tabac sec [A method to determine the activity of proteolytic ferments in dry tobacco]; Proc. 2nd Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Brussels, Belgium (1958) 647–649. Bailescu, G.E. and T. Constantinescu: Some aspects concerning the identification by TLC and the direct determination in situ of some natural pyridinic compounds detected with the Dragendorff reagent; Rev. Chem. (Bucharest) 26 (1975) 952–959, see Chem. Abstr. 85 (1976) 43240. Bailey, J.A., R.S. Burden, and G.G. Vincent: Capsidiol: An antifungal compound produced in Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana clevelandii following infection with tobacco necrosis virus; Phytochemistry 14 (1975) 597. Bailey, J.A., G.G. Vincent, and R.S. Burden: The antifungal activity of glutinosone and capsidiol and their accumulation in virus-infected tobacco species; Physiol. Plant Pathol. (1975) 35–41. Ball, J. L.: Studies of the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine; Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University (1961). Balz, H.P.: Intracellular localization and function of hydrolytic enzymes in tobacco; Planta 70 (1966) 201–236. Barankie, J. and J. Paszkows: Purine metabolism in mesophyll protoplasts of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves; Biochem. J. 186 (1980) 343–350.
1437
4459. Barber, G.A.: The enzymic synthesis of uridine diphosphate L-rhamnose; Fed. Am. Soc. Exptl. Biol. (1963). 4460. Baron, R.L. and F.E. Guthrie: Study of sugars found in tobacco as affected by green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer); Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 52 (1959) 257. 4461. Baron, R.L. and F.E. Guthrie: A quantitative and qualitative study of sugars found in tobacco as affected by the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae, and its honeydew; Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 53 (1960) 220–228. 4462. Barr, R. and C.B. Arntzen: Occurrence of D-tocopherylquinone in higher plants and its relation to senescence; Plant Physiol. 44 (1969) 593–598. 4463. Barr, R., K.-L. Huang, and F.A. Crane: Plastoquinone distribution in various plant series; Plant Physiol. (1966) XXII. 4464. Base, H.W.: A comprehensive study on the forced aging of flue-cured tobacco leaves; Han’guk Nonghwahakhoe Chi 13 (1970) 1–27. 4465. Battard, J.C. and S. Nazarene: Determination of carboxymethylcellulose; Ann. Tabac 15 (1977) 13–18. 4466. Baxter, J. and D. Steinberg: Absorption of phytol from dietary chlorophyll in the rat; J. Lipid Res. 8 (1967) 613–620. 4467. Bayer, M.H.: Gas chromatographic analysis of acidic indole auxins in Nicotiana; 44 (1969) 267–271. 4468. Bayer, M.H.: Transport and accumulation of IAA-14C in tumor forming Nicotiana hybrids; J. Exp. Bot. 23 (1972) 801–812. 4469. Behrend, J. and R.I. Mateles: Nitrogen metabolism in plant cell suspension cultures: I. Effect of amino acids on growth; Plant Physiol. 56 (1975) 584–589. 4470. Beise, U.: Paper chromatography of lipids from sound and virus infected plants; Phytopath. Zeitsch. 49 (1963) 29–40. 4471. Beisenherz, W.: Rapidly labeled RNA in heterotrophically cultured tissues of Nicotiana tabacum; Z. Naturforsch. 27B (1972) 1205–1215. 4472. Beisenherz, W.V. and P. Koth; Influence of chloramphenicol and cycloheximide on the synthesis of ribulose-1,5-diphosphate-carboxlase, glycerinaldehyde3-phosphate-dehydrogenase, and chlorophyll during leucoplast-chloroplast-tranformation in tissue cultures of Nicotiana tabacum; Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 75 (1974) 201–210. 4473. Beisenherz, W.V. and H.A.W. Schneider: Localization of synthesis of enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthesis; Ber. Deutsch Bot. Ges. 87 (1974) 161–166. 4474. Bellamy, A.R.: RNA synthesis in exponentially growing tobacco cells subjected to a step-down nutritional shift; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 123 (1966) 102–115. 4475. Bellarts, S.: Growth of pollen tubes after homogenous and heterogenous fertilization of some Solanacea and the composition of their pollens and pistils; Planta 47 (1956) 588–612. 4476. Belser, W.L., J.B. Murphy, D.P. Delmer, and S.E. Mills: End product control of tryptophan biosynthesis in extracts and intact cells of the higher plant Nicotiana tabacum var. Wisconsin 38; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 237 (1971) 1–10. 4477. Bendurski, R.S. and S.C. Mahesbuari: Nucleotide incorporation into nucleic acid by tobacco leaf homogenates; Plant Physiol. 34 (1962) 556–560. 4478. Benner, J.F.: Report on tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 55 (1972) 244.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1437
11/24/08 2:40:05 PM
1438
4479. Benveniste, P.: Biosynthesis of sterols in tobacco tissues from in vitro; Phytochemistry 7 (1968) 951–953. 4480. Benveniste, P., L. Hirth, and G. Ourisson: Biosynthesis of sterols in tobacco tissue cultures. Identification of cycloartenol and methylene-24-cycloartenol; Compt. Rend. 259 (1964) 2284–2287. 4481. Bergmann, L, W. Thies, and K. Erdelsky: The occurrence of glucosamine esters of hydroxycinnamic acids of Nicotiana tabacum; Z. Naturforsch. 20B (1965) 1297–1301. 4482. Berlin, J.: Formation of putrescine and cinnamoyl putrescines in tobacco cell cultures; Phytochemistry 20 (1981) 53–55. 4483. Berlyn, M.B., S.I. Ahmed, and N.H. Giles: Organization of polyaromatic biosynthetic enzymes in a variety of photosynthetic organisms; J. Bacteriol. 134 (1970) 768–774. 4484. Bernard, M.J., R.G. Nicholls, and W.W. Reid: Biosynthesis of terpenes and sterols in Nicotiana tabacum; Australian Biochem. Soc. Mtg. (1966). 4485. Bhide, S.V., A.I. Pratp, N.M. Shivapurkar, A.T. Sipahimalani, and M.S. Chadha: Detection of nitrosamines in a commonly used chewing tobacco; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 19 (1981) 481–484. 4486. Biglino, G.: Determination of tobacco alkaloids by countercurrent partition; Ann. Chim. 49 (1959) 1294–1304. 4487. Bird, I.F., M.J. Cornelius, T.A. Dyer, and A.J. Keys: Purity of chloroplasts isolated in non-aqueous media; J. Exp. Bot. 24 (1973) 211–215. 4488. Bird, I.F., M.J. Cornelius, A.J. Keys, and C.P. Whittingham: Adenosine triphosphate synthesis and the natural electron acceptor for synthesis of serine from glycine in leaves; Biochem. J. 126 (1972) 191–192. 4489. Bird, I.F., H.K. Porter, and C.R. Stocking: Intracellular localization of enzymes associated with sucrose synthesis in leaves; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 100 (1965) 366–375. 4490. Birnbaum, E.H.: Aspects of enzymic changes during germination of Nicotiana tabacum seed; Ph. D. Thesis, North Carolina State University (1972), see Dissertation Abstr. (1972) 5693. 4490a. Birnstiel, M.: The redox potential of living and dying plant tissue (Browning of tobacco); Ph. D. Thesis, Eidgenossische Tech. School, Zurich, Switzerland (1960). 4491. Blaim, K.: Degradation of trigonelline to nicotinic acid in the germinating seed of Nicotiana rustica; Naturwissenschaften 47 (1960) 322. 4492. Blume, D.E. and J.A. Saunders: A high-pressure liquid chromatographic technique for assaying several phenolic enzymes; Plant Physiol. (1980) Suppl. 144. 4493. Bocevski, D.: Influence of temperature on oxidase inactivation during the enzymatic fermentation of large leaf tobaccos; CORESTA 1978 Symp., Sofia, Bulgaria, CORESTA Inf. Bull., Spec. Edition 1978: Paper A3–18, p. 75. 4494. Boller, T. and H. Kende: Vacuolar enzymes from cultured tobacco cells; Plant Physiol. (1978) Suppl. 533. 4495. Bolt, A.J.N., S.W. Purkis, and J.S. Sadd: A damascene derivative from Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 613–614. 4496. Boreiko, V.K.: Fractional composition of the proteins from tobacco sprouts under the effect of maleic hydrazide; Tezisy Dokl. Soobshch.-Konf. Molodykh Uch. Mold. (1974) 158.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4497. Borthwick, J., C.J.W. Brooks, W.W. Reid, and R.A. Russell: Phytochemistry of the genus Nicotiana. Part VI. A preliminary GC/MS study of some diterpenes and sterols; Ann. Tabac SEITA 12 (Sect.2) (1975) 22–25. 4498. Boulter, D., D. Peacock, A. Guise, J.T. Gleavest, and G. Estabrook: Relationships between the partial amino acid sequences of plastocyanine members of ten families of flowering plants; Phytochemistry 18 (1979) 603–608. 4499. Brady, U.E. and D.A. Nordlund: Cis-9-trans-12tetradecadien-1-yl acetate in the female tobacco moth Ephestia elutella (Hübner) and evidence for an additional component of the sex pheromone; Life Sci. 10 (1971) 797–801. 4500. Brandsteterova, E., J. Lehotay, O. Liska, and J. Garaj: High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of dimethyldithiocarbamate residues in some agricultural products; J. Chromatogr. 354 (1986) 375–381. 4501. Bredemeijer, G.M.M.: The distribution of peroxidase isoenzymes, chlorogenic acid oxidase and glucose-6phosphate dehydrogenase in transmitting tissue and cortex of Nicotiana alata styles; Acta Bot. Neerl. 28 (1979) 197–203. 4502. Brégeon, B., B. Gonny, and M. Coupé: Simple and reliable method for the quantification of proteins in tobacco; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 29, 2007, pp. 32–33. 4503. Brennicke, A. and H.D. Frey: Properties of an adenosine cyclic phosphate degrading enzyme in Nicotiana tabacum L. var. Xanthi; Z. Naturforsch. 32 (1977) 297–300. 4504. Bressan, R.A., C.W. Ross, and J. Vandepeute: Attempts to detect cyclic adenosine 3’:5’-monophosphate in higher plants by three assay methods; Plant Physiol. 57 (1976) 29–37. 4505. Brishammar, S. and N. Juntti: RNA-synthesizing enzymes in healthy and TMV-infected tobacco leaves. Separation and properties of enzymes catalyzing nucleotide polymerization; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 164 (1974) 218–223. 4506. Brishammar, S. and N. Juntti: RNA-synthesizing enzymes in health and TMV-infected tobacco leaves. Partial purification and characterization of tobacco polynucleotide phosphorylase; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 164 (1974) 224–232. 4507. Brishammar, S. and N. Juntti: Poly(U)polymerase in tobacco leaves; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 383 (1975) 351–358. 4508. Brody, A.R. and L.H. Hill: Inorganic particles in tobacco smoke and in the lungs of cigarette smokers; Environ. Hlth. Perspectives 33 (1979) 339. 4509. Brossard, D.: The influence of kinetin on formation and ploidy levels of buds arising from N. tabacum pith tissue grown in vitro; Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 78 (1976) 323–333. 4510. Brown, D.C.W. and T.A. Thorpe: Adenosine phosphate and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide pool sizes during shoot initiation in tobacco callus; Plant Physiol. 65 (1980) 587–590. 4511. Brown, D.F.: Gas chromatographic determination of changes in concentration of pipecolic acid and other free amino acid in hypersensitive tobacco plants induced by tobacco mosaic virus and temperature; Ph. D. Thesis, Utah State University (1969), see Dissertation Abstr. (1971) 3831–3832.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1438
11/24/08 2:40:05 PM
Bibliography
4512. Brown, G.W., C.G. McKee, and O.E. Street: Effects of irrigation, nitrogen and fertilization, plant population and variety of physico-chemical properties of Maryland tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1971) 148–160. 4513. Brown, S.A. and M. Tenniswood: Aberrant coumarin metabolism in crown gall tumor tissue of tobacco; Can. J. Botany 52 (1974) 1091–1094. 4514. Browning, G. and J. Eagles: Ribosylzeatin and zeatin in tobacco crown gall tissue; Planta 147 (1980) 269–273. 4515. Bruemmer, U., C. Paulsen, C. Sprnemberg, F. Seehofer, V. Heemann, and V. Sinnwell: New cembranoids from burley tobacco; Z. Naturforsch. C. Biosci. 36C (1981) 1077–1080. 4516. Bryan, W.: Studies on the effect of indoleacetic acid on cultured tobacco; Dissertation Abstr. (1959) 859. 4517. Budagyants, A.K.: Method for determining nicotine and naphthenic acid in tobacco during their combined presence; Izvest. Akad. Nauk. Kaz. SSR Ser. Biol. Nauk (1978) 38–40. 4518. Bulkina, E.V.: Comparative evaluation of methods of determining phosphoric acid in tobacco; Sbor. Nauk. Issledovatel. Rabot. Krasnodar SSR 154 (1969) 41–43. 4519. Bundel, A.A., V.L. Kretovich, and G.A. Prokosheva: The distribution of plant hydroxylamine reductase; Fiziol. Rast. 12 (1965) 971–979. 4520. Bundel, A.A., V.L. Kretovich, and G.A. Prokosheva: Distribution of plant hydroxylamine reductase; Soviet Plant Physiol. 12 (1966) 854–861. 4521. Burden, R.S., P.M. Powell, J.A. Bailey, R.S.T. Loeffler, M.S. Kemp, and C.A. Brown: Debneyol, a fungicidal sesquiterpene from TNV infected Nicotiana debneyi; Phytochemistry 24 (1985) 2191–2194. 4522. Burrows, W.J.: Incorporation of 3H-adenine into free cytokinins by cytokinin-autonomous tobacco callus tissue; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 84 (1978) 743–748. 4523. Burrows, W.J., F. Skoog, and N.J. Leonard: Isolation and identification of cytokinins located in the transfer ribonucleic acid of tobacco callus grown in the presence of 6-benzylaminopurine; Biochemistry 10 (1971) 2189–2194. 4524. Bush, L.P.: Succinyl thiokinase of tobacco; Agron. Abstr. (1967) 24. 4525. Bush, L.P. and J.L. Sims: Influence of cultural practice, environment and genetics on volatile nitrogenous bases in tobacco; Proc. Univ. KY Tobacco Health Workshop Conf. (1973) 742–752. 4526. Buta, J.G.: Glucosamine derivative of caffeic acid in Nicotiana nodal tumors; Phytochemistry 9 (1970) 1143–1144. 4527. Buta, J.G. and G.W. Schaeffer: The anthocyanin pigment of Nicotiana nodal tumors; Phytochemistry 6 (1967) 447–449. 4528. Byerrum, R. U., C.S. Sato, and C.D. Bell: Utilization of betaine as a methyl group donor in tobacco; Plant Physiol. 31 (1956) 374–377. 4529. Byrd, G.D. and M.W. Ogden: A ring trial test of nicotine uptake determinations by multiple laboratories; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 28, 2007, p. 32. 4530. Cabanne, F., J. Martin-Tanguy, and C. Martin: Phenolamines associated with floral induction and the reproductive state of Nicotiana tabacum var Xanthi NC; Physiol. Veg. 15 (1977) 429–443.
1439
4531. Capuno, V.T. and A.A. Alejar: Variations in plant hormones. II. The relation of abscisic acid and l-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid to yellowing behaviour in tobacco leaves; Phil. Agric. U.P. Los Ba–os 68 (1985) 385–392. 4532. Carvalho, H., S. Pereira, C. Sunkel, and R. Salema: Detection of a cytosolic glutamine synthetase in leaves of Nicotiana tabacum L. by immunocytochemical methods; Plant Physiol. 100 (1992) 1591–1594. 4533. Catesson, A. M., A. Pang, and R. Goldberg: Use of cytochemical techniques for the detection of cell wall enzyme activities: Peroxidases; Actual. Botany (1991) 257–262. 4534. Chamberlain, W.J.: Polar lipid materials in cigarette smoke condensate; Tob. Sci. 20 (1976) 168–170. 4535. Chedekel, M.R.: I. Aberrant biosynthetic studies in Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana glauca. II. Synthetic studies of the tobacco alkaloids. 1,4-Additions to acyl carbanion equivalents; Dissertation Abstr. (1973) 2519. 4536. Chen, C.M. and D.K. Meltiz: Cytokinin biosynthesis in a cell-free system from cytokinin-autotrophic tobacco tissue cultures; FEBS Lett. 107 (1979) 15–20. 4537. Chen, J. and W.G. Boll: Tryptophan synthase: A twocomponent enzyme from pea plants (Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska); Can. J. Botany 49 (1971) 1155–1163. 4538. Chen, T.C. and G.W. Miller: Purification and characterization of uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase from tobacco leaves; Plant Cell Physiol. 15 (1974) 993–1005. 4539. Cheng, H.H. and W.A. Court: Effects of green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulzer), on certain chemical constituents of flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 21 (1977) 134–135. 4540. Cheng, T.Y.: Induction of indoleacetic acid synthetases in tobacco pith explants; Plant Physiol. 50 (1972) 723–727. 4541. Chojnowski, J.R. and A. Dorabialska: The problem of tobacco smoke cancerogenesis, based on the studies of radioactivity; Odbitka A. Polskiego Tygodnika Lekarskego 12 (1957) 1–12. 4542. Chollet, R. and L.L. Anderson: Cyanate modification of essential lysyl residues in the catalytic subunit of tobacco ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 525 (1978) 455–467. 4543. Chouteau, J.: Acid-base balance in Paraguay tobacco; Ann. Inst. Exptl. Tabak. Bergerac 3 (1960) 297–383. 4544. Chouteau, J.: Anion-cation balance in the tobacco plant. Significance of the difference delta between total alkalinity of ash (ATA) and total nitrogen content (N); Ann. Tabac SEITA 23(Sect.2) (1991) 95–104. 4545. Chouteau, J. and R. Vanbercie: Evolution of the residues of Maneb applied to tobacco in relation to time after application and fermentation; Argon. Trop. (Paris) 24 (1969) 156–160. 4546. Christeller, J.T. and N.E. Tolbert: Phosphoglycolate phosphatase. Purification and properties; J. Biol. Chem. 253 (1978) 1780–1785. 4547. Chwoidak, C.A., D.A. Self, and H.R. Wheeler: A collaborative, harmonized LC/MS/MS method for the determination of tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) in tobacco and tobacco-related products; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 30, 2007, pp. 33–34. 4548. Clark, A.E. and B.A. Stone: B-1,3-Glucan hydrolases from the grape vine (Vitis vinifera) and other plants; Phytochemistry 1 (1962) 175–188.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1439
11/24/08 2:40:05 PM
1440
4549. Clayton, R.A. and L.M. Hanslman: Tobacco nucleotide pyrophosphatases; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 87 (1960) 161–166. 4550. Cocallemen, S., J. Chahboun, M. Farines, and J. Soulier: Sterols of some Solanaceae seeds. A specific sterol?; Oleagineux; 47 (1992) 477–480. 4551. Codd, G.A.: Photoinactivation of tobacco transketolase in the presence of flavine mononucleotide; Z. Naturforsch. 27B (1972) 701–704. 4552. Cole, J.S. and Z. Zvenyika: The extraction, estimation and persistence of Benodanil fungicide in tobacco tissues; Pestic. Sci. 12 (1981) 199–205. 4553. Comber, R.: British-American Tobacco Group R&D, Southampton. Part. II. Biological activity in tobacco smoke; Chem. Ind. (London) (1972) 64–66. 4553a. Constantinescu, T.: A study on the influence of pyridine alkaloids from tobacco on taste and aroma; Lucr. Cercet, Inst. Cercet. Proiect Aliment. 10 (1972) 257–268. 4554. Conway, N.: Lead poisoning from unusual causes; Industrial Med. 9 (1940) 471–477. 4554a. Cook, L.C. and A. Rodgman: Tobacco substitutes. I. Cellulose and various plant materials; RDM, 1967, No. 64, October 12, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500613571 -3583. 4555. Cornelius, P., E. Claessen, and J. Claessen: Reversed phase chromatography of iso accepting tRNAs from healthy and crown gall tissues from Nicotiana tabacum; Nucleic Acids Res. 2 (1975) 1153–1161. 4556. Cornelius, P. and M.C. Dupont-dePatoul: Characterization of the tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases of healthy callus tissues from Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 14 (1975) 397–401. 4557. Cornetta, J.C.: The metabolism of a cytokinin and the aminoacyl-synthetases of tobacco tissue; Dissertation Abstr. (1970) 991. 4558. Creamer, R.M.: Studies in cigarette smoke formation; 29th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 29, Paper No. 55, 1975, p. 36. 4559. Cutler, H.G., W.W. Reid, and J. Deletang: Plant growth inhibiting properties of diterpenes from tobacco; Plant Cell Physiol. 18 (1977) 711–714. 4560. Dadgari, R.: Study of the influence exerted by some chemical constituents of tobacco combustibility; Ann. Tabac SEITA 11 (1974) 7–47. 4561. Dango, R.: Physicochemical characteristics of popular brands of Albanian cigarettes; Bul. Univ. Shteteror Tiranes 25 (1971) 121–125. 4562. Dare, D.L., E.D. Entwistle, and R.A.W. Johnstone: Constituents of cigarette smoke. Part X. Evidence for 1,5-hydrogen transfer in the formation of non-conjugated isoprenoid polyolefins during pyrolysis; J. Chem. Soc. Sect. C (1968) 977–980. 4563. Davies, L., B.H. Song, and W.W. Weeks: Chemical characterization of dark tobacco semi-volatile oils; Proc. 7th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong., Manila (1980) Paper No. APST 02, pp. 134–135. 4564. Davis, D.L., K.L. Stevens, and L. Jurd: Chemistry of tobacco constituents. Oxidation of A-ionone and the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of 5-keto-A-ionone; J. Agr. Food Chem. 24 (1976) 187–189. 4565. De Jong, D.W.: Light regulation of enzyme levels in tobacco leaves; Plant Physiol. (1973) Suppl. 274. 4566. De Jong, D.W. and J.J. Lam Jr: Application of homogenized leaf curing to protein recovery and to the alteration
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4567.
4568.
4569.
4570.
4570a.
4571.
4572.
4573.
4573a. 4574.
4575.
4576.
4577.
4578.
4579.
of leaf chemistry for production of less hazardous tobacco; Tob. Res. 5 (1979) 1–27. Deletang, J.: Presence of caffeoyl putrecine, caffeoyl spermidine and dicaffeoyl spermidine in Nicotiana tabacum; Ann. Tabac SEITA 12 (Sect. 2) (1974) 123–128. Deletang, J.: Alkaloid production and its relations to rhizogenesis in N. tabacum; Ann. Tabac SEITA 14 (Sect. 2) (1977) 5–110. Delgado, E., M.A.J. Parry, D.W. Lawlor, A.J. Keys, and H. Medrano: Photosynthesis, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase, and leaf characteristics of Nicotiana tabacum L. genotypes selected by survival at low carbon dioxide concentrations; J. Exp. Botany 44 (1993) 1–7. Demandre, C., A. Iremolieres, A. Justin, and P. Mazliak: Analysis of molecular species of plant polar lipids by high-performance and gas liquid chromatography; Phytochemistry 24 (1985) 481–485. Demole, E.: Investigation of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC); Report No. 4, March 14, 1986, see www.rjrtdocs. com 50855306 -5318 and 505859605 -9619. Derr, W.: Organic acids in Virginia tobacco: Detection and determination of glyoxalic acid and A-ketoglutaric acid; Tabak Forschung 67 (1957) 53–60. Dewey, L.J. and W. Stepka: A test of possible intermediates in the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine and some observations on the specificity of the reaction; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 38, 1964, p. 25. Dickerson, J.H., J.P. Dickerson, R.A. Heckman, R.A. Lloyd Jr, D.L. Roberts, and J.N. Schumacher: Literature study of the pyrolysis of amino acids or ammonia and sugars; RDM, 1976, No. 25, May 25, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500616826 -6851 Dickerson, J.P. and D.L. Roberts: Tobacco product; U.S. Patent No. 3,996,940 (1976). Dickinson, D.E.: Occurrence of glucoronokinase in various plant tissues and comparison of enzyme activity of seedlings and green plants; Phytochemistry 21 (1982) 843–844. Dinesh, T.K., H.S. Raghu, N. Palini, and S.V. Dhalewadikar: A rapid method for quantification of sucrose esters in tobacco; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 42, 2007, pp. 41–42. Doman, N.G., L.N. Khadzhi-Murat, and S.E. Demina: Unity and individual path assimilation of carbon by different types of plants; Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 122 (1958) 171–174. Dragiev, M. and V. Ivanchev: Changes in the activity of adenosinetriphosphatase and succinic dehydrogenase of the liver, kidneys, heart, and brain of rabbits under the effect of toxic substances forming during tobacco fermentation; Gig. Tr. Prof. Zabo 15 (1971) 32–25. Dube, M.F., C.R. Green, F.W. Best, and T.R. Young: Smoke comparison of G7 and four G7-type tobacco cigarettes; RDR, 1980, No. 4, November 6, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501005967 -5976. Dube, M.F., C.W. Miller, C.R. Green, T.R. Young, and F.W. Best: Smoke composition: Comparison of smoke semi-volatiles from Winston B and Winston B hot/dry treated cigarettes and vapor phase analysis of Winston and Marlboro and their hot/dry and reconditioned
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1440
11/24/08 2:40:05 PM
Bibliography
4580.
4581.
4582.
4583.
4584.
4585.
4586.
4587.
4588.
4589.
4590.
4591.
4592.
4593.
4593a.
4594.
4595.
counterparts; RDM, 1980, No. 36, October 16, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500618071 -8099. Ducet, G. and A.J. Rosenburg: Respiratory activities in higher plants. II. New studies on the action of carbon monoxide; Biochimiya 22 (1957) 380–387. Dyakonov, A.J., C.A. Brown, R.T. Walker, and J. Guan: Controlling the tobacco combustion by potassium salts; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 53, 2007, p. 48. Dyson, W.H. and R.H. Hall: N6-($2-Isopentenyl)adenosine: Its occurrence as a free nucleoside in an autonomous strain of tobacco tissue; Plant Physiol. 50 (1972) 16–21. Eda, S., Y. Akiyama, K. Kato, R. Takahashi, I. Kosakabe, A. Ishizu, and J. Nakano: Structural investigation of a galactoglucomannan from cell walls of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) midrib; Carbohydrate Res. 131 (1984) 105–118. Eda, S., F. Watanabe, and K. Kato: 4-O-Methylglucuronoxian isolated from the midrib of Nicotiana tabacum; Agr. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 429–434. Edwards, W.B., D.F. Glenn, F. Green, and R.H. Newman: The preparation of tobacco constituents incorporating stable isotopes. I. Synthesis of d,l-nornicotine-1’-15N and d,1-nicotine-1’-15N; J. Labeled Compds. Radiopharm. 14 (1978) 255–261. Eglite, G.: Effect of tomato aspermia virus on the composition of sugars and activity of certain enzymes in tobacco leaves; Latv. Lauksaimn. Akad. Rakst. 136 (1977) 32–37. Eichholtz, D.A., C.S. Gasser, and G.M. Kishore: Glyphosate-resistant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphohikimatsynthase (EPSP synthase) gene mutant; WO 9206201 A1 16 Apr 1992 Einolf, W.N., R.N. Ferguson, J.F. Whidby, and J.F. DeBardeleben: Isolation and identification of 2,6-dimethyl- and 2,2,6-trimethyl-4-piperidone, artifacts produced by the reaction of cigarette smoke condensate and acetone; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 9 (1978) 208–213. Einset, J.W.: Nopaline production in tobacco plantlets regenerated from C58 crown galls; Plant Physiol. (1981) Suppl. 857. Einset, J.W. and F. Skoog: Biosynthesis of cytokinins in cytokinin-autotrophic tobacco callus; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70 (1973) 658–660. Elliott, D. and J. Skinner: Calcium-dependent, phospholipid-activated protein kinase in plants; Phytochemistry 25 (1986) 39–44. Erdelsky, K. and P. Kovaces: Occurrence of L-aspartate2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase in tissue cultures of Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun; Acta Fac. Rerum Nat. Univ. Comenianae Physiol. Plant 2 (1970) 91–97. Esami, V.: Phosphatase and apyrase activities of mosaic virus-infected tobacco plants; Rev. Biol. Acad. Rep. Populaire Roumaine 7 (1962) 193. Even-Chen, Z., D. Atsmon, and C. Itai: Hormonal aspects of senescence in detached tobacco leaves; Physiol. Plant 44 (1978) 377–382. Falk, H.L.: Chemical agents in cigarette smoke; in: Handbook of physiology: Reaction to Environmental Agents, edited by D.H.K. Lee, Waverly, Baltimore, MD (1977) pp. 199–211. Fannin, F.F. and L.P. Bush: Nicotine demethylation in Nicotiana; Med. Sci. Res. 20 (1991) 867–868.
1441
4596. Figge, K. and H.P. Voss: Investigation on the transfer of ethylenethiourea into tobacco smoke; Verband Zigarettenindustrie, Internal Rept. (1976). 4597. Firmin, J.L. and R.G. Fenwick: N2-(1,3-Dicarboxypropyl) ornithine in crown gall tumors; Phytochemistry 16 (1977) 761–762. 4598. Firmin, J.L. and R.G. Fenwick: Agropine. A major new plasmid-determined metabolite in crown gall tumors; Nature 276 (1978) 842–844. 4599. Fischer, W. and G. Weidemann: Metabolism of 2`-deoxyhexoses and 2,2`-deoxymaltose in plants; Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitsch. Physiol. Chem. 346 (1966) 171–180. 4600. Forsblom, I., J.E. Berg, and I. Wahlberg: Tobacco chemistry. 75. Two new cembratrienetriols from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. B47 (1993) 80–88. 4601. Fortini, S.: The influence of light and CO2 concentration on the activity of some enzymatic systems in leaf tissue; Ann. Sperimentaz. Agrar. 9 (1955) 1175–1195. 4602. Fowden, L.: New amino acids in plants; Biological Rev. 33 (1958) 3933–441. 4603. Fox., J.E., J. Cornette, G. Deleuze, W. Dyson, C. Giersak, P. Wiu, J. Zapaata, and J. McChesney: The formation, isolation, and biological activity of a cytokinin 7-glucoside; Plant Physiol. 52 (1973) 627–632. 4604. Fraser, R.S.S.: Effect of two strains of tobacco mosaic virus on growth and RNA content of tobacco leaves; Virology 47 (1972) 262–269. 4605. Frey-Wyssling, A.J., J.W. Szarkowski, and M.L. Birnstiel: On the oxidation of chlorogenic acid and DCPA during the drying of tobacco; Naturwissenschaften 46 (1969) 602. 4606. Fritig, B. and L. Hirth: Biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids and coumarins in TMV-infected tobacco leaves and tobacco tissue cultures; Acta Phytopathol. 6 (1971) 21–29. 4607. Fu, M.C., B.J. Wilkinson, and D.C. White: Characterization of the cytochrome oxidase inhibitor found in the gas phase of tobacco smoke; Proc. Univ. KY Tobacco Health Workshop Conf. (1972) 239–252. 4608. Fuchs, A., W. Slobbe, P.C. Mol, and M.A. Posthumus: GC/MS analysis of fungitoxic terpenoids from tobacco; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 1197–1199. 4609. Fujimori, T., H. Kaneko, and K. Kato: C15 and C17aldehydes from Japanese domestic tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum cv. Suifu; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 769–770. 4610. Fujimori, T., Y. Takagi, and K. Kato: Isolation of 8,9dehydrotheaspirone from Nicotiana tabacum; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 2925–2926. 4611. Fujimori, T., R. Uegaki, S. Kubo, and K. Kato: Sesquiterpenoids, stress compounds from tobacco leaves; 34th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 34, Paper No. 24, 1980, p. 13. 4612. Fukai, Y. and Y. Takanami: Quantitative analysis of ethylene oxide in mainstream cigarette smoke; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 54, 2007, pp. 48–49. 4613. Furuya, T., M. Hirotani, and K. Kawaguchi: Biotransformation of progesterone and pregnenolone by plant suspension cultures; 19 (1971) 1013–1017. 4614. Gaines, T.P. and N.G. Cutler: Effect of flue curing on the amylose amylopectin ratio of tobacco starch; J. Agr. Food Chem. 22 (1974) 706–708.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1441
11/24/08 2:40:06 PM
1442
4615. Gaines, T.P. and J.D. Miles: Protein composition and classification of tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 23 (1975) 690–694. 4616. Gallaher, R.N.: Occurrence of calcium in plant tissue as crystals of calcium oxalate; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 6 (1975) 315–330. 4617. Gamanetz, L.V. and K. Gamburg: The effect of adenine on growth, starch and ADPG content in suspensioncultured tobacco cells; Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 104 (1981) 61–70. 4618. Gamburg, K.Z.: The influence of 1-naphthalacetic acid and (2-chloroethyl)trimethyl ammonium chloride on the carotenoid content of tobacco tissue in suspension culture; Biol. Plant 20 (1978) 93–97. 4619. Gardner, J.M. and C.I. Kado: Polygalacturonic acid trans-elimanase in the osmotic shock fluid of Erwinia rubrifaciens: Characterization of the purified enzyme and its effect on plant cells; J. Bacteriol. 127 (1976) 451–460. 4620. Gawer, M., M. Laloue, and C. Terrine: Metabolism and biological significance of benzyladenine-7-glucoside; Plant Sci. Lett. 8 (1977) 267–274. 4621. Gawer, M., M. Laloue, and C. Terrine: Cytokinins: Formation of the nucleoside-5’-triphosphate in tobacco and Acer cells; FEBS Lett. 107 (1979) 15–20. 4622. Gayrel, P.: Investigation of the activity of uricase in several angiospermes. Development during the early stages of growth in Nicotiana tabacum L., var. Paraguay; Compt. Rend. 249 (1959) 2104–2105. 4623. Gerardi, A., C. Byrd, L. Dominguez, N. Qian, and S. Parsons: Development of fast HPLC analyses of tobacco and smoke compounds using a 1.8 μm particle size, 50 mm C-18 column; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 41, 2007, p. 41. 4624. Gigot, C., A. Nicolaieff, and G. Philipps: Tobacco chromatin: Biochemical and electron microscopic studies; Colloq. Int. C.N.R.S. (1977) 143–146. 4625. Giles, J.A. Effect of ozone of burley tobacco; RDR, 1961, No. 7, February 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500936050 -6068 4626. Giovannozzi-Sermanni, G.: Investigation of tobacco fermentation. Variation in organic acids and amino acids in Kentucky tobacco by Toscani cigar type fermentation of the gas forms; Il Tabacco 63 (1959) 149–160. 4627. Glassiou, K.T.: Respiration and levels of phosphate esters during kinetin-induced oil division in tobacco pith sections; Nature 179 (1957) 1083–1084. 4628. Gloymoay, F. and G.L. Ferkas: Metabolic characteristics at the enzyme level of tobacco tissue exhibiting localized acquired resistance to viral infection; Virology 21 (1963) 110–121. 4629. Going, R.E., S.C. Hsu, R.L. Pollack, and L.D. Haugh: Sugar and fluoride content of various forms of tobacco; J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 100 (1980) 27–33. 4630. Gore, N.R. and J.L. Wray: Evidence for synthesis de novo and turnover of leucyl-transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase from cultured cells of Nicotiana tabacum var Xanthi; Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2 (1974) 1240–1243. 4631. Gray, J.C.: Purification and properties of Cytochrome F from higher plants; Trans. Biochem. Soc. London 5 (1977) 326–328. 4632. Green, C.R. and J.N. Schumacher: Use of glutarimides to improve the quality of smoking products; CIM, 1972,
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4633.
4633a.
4634.
4635.
4636.
4637.
4638.
4639.
4640.
4641.
4642.
4643.
4644.
4645.
4646.
4647.
4648.
No. 33, June 1, see www. rjrtdocs.com 504168346 -8347. Green, C.R. and F.A. Thome: Cigarette ash tray odor; RDR, 1978, No. 1, January 19, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501005314 -5338. Griffith, R.B., R.R. Johnson, and A.D. Quinn: Organoleptically improved tobacco product; U.S. Patent No. 3,174,485 (1965). Grigorescu, I., M. Voiculescu, and P. Marinescu: Burley tobacco drying on plastic sheets; Ind. Aliment (Bucharest) 24 (1973) 676–680. Grigoreva, N.Y., V.F. Kucherev, V.N. Lozhnikova, and M.K. Chailakhyan: Gibberelline and related substances. IV. Gibberelline and gibberellin-like substances from the leaves of Nicotiana tabacum; Khim. Prirodn. Sokdinenii 5 (1969) 251–256. Guan, J., K. Barrett, J. Hamm, S. Haye, J. Lawson, K. Mills, and G. Shelar: Correlations between tobacco blend, firecone temperatures, and Hoffmann deliveries; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 55, 2007, p. 49. Guedes, M., J. Duc, R. Hammerschmidt, and R. Eastock: Accumulation of six sequiterpenoid phytoalexins in tobacco leaves infiltrated with Pseudomonas lachrymans; Phytochemistry 21 (1982) 2987–2988. Guseva, A.R. and M.G. Borikhina: Sulfanilamide acetylation as a means of coenzyme assay in higher plants; Biokhimia 23 (1958) 272–276. Gutierrez, M., R. Kanai, S.C. Huber, S.B. Ku, and G.E. Edwards: Photosynthesis in mesophyll protoplasts and bundle sheath cells of various types of C4 plants. I. Carboxylase and CO2 fixation studies; A. Pflanzenphysiol. 72 (1974) 305–319. Haise, K.P. and G. Jacobi: Comparative studies on the lipid composition of etioplasts and chloroplasts from fisum and of chloroplasts from a mutant Nicotiana; Planta 111 (1973) 137–148. Hall, N.P., P. Koivuniemi, and N.E. Tolbert: The ratio of RuBP carboxylase to RuBP oxygenase in crude and purified preparations from tobacco leaves; Plant Physiol. (1978) Suppl, 544. Hammerschmidt, R. and J. Kuc: Isolation and identification of phytuberin from Nicotiana tabacum previously infiltrated with an incompatible bacterium; Phytochemistry 18 (1979) 874. Hansjoerg, A.W.: Proteins limiting chlorophyll synthesis. Experimental data and a tentative working model; Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges. (1973) 431–436. Harborne, J.B.: Anthocyanins and their sugar components; Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturstoffe, 20 (1962) 165–199. Harrell, T.G.: Zineb residue on tobacco leaf (1961 crop of Greece); RDM, 1962, No. 90, September 25, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500612207 -2211. Hart, G.E. and C.R. Bhatia: Acrylamide gel electrophoresis of soluble leaf proteins and enzymes from Nicotiana species; Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9 (1967) 367–374. Harvey, J., J.C.Y. Hau, and R.W. Reiser: Metabolism of oxamyl in plants; J. Agric. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 529–536. Haslam, S.C. and T.W. Young: Purification of N-methylputrescine oxidase from Nicotiana rustica; Phytochemistry 31 (1992) 4075–4079.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1442
11/24/08 2:40:06 PM
1443
Bibliography
4649. Hassam, S.: Preparative isolation of [U-14C]Solanesol from carbon-14 dioxide-chamber grown tobacco; J. Labeled Compd. Radiopharm. 22 (1985) 1261–1271. 4650. Hasse, K. and P. Homan: Decarboxylation of the ketoanalogues of some amino acids; Biochem. Z. 335 (1962) 474–484. 4650a. Hasse, K. and P. Homan: Enzymatic synthesis of pyrrolidine- and piperidine-alkaloids; Biochem. Z. 337 (1963) 480–489. 4651. Hayashi, K., Y. Shimizu, and H. Takahara: Extraction of nerve growth factor biosynthesis promoters from tobacco; JP 04210643 A2 31 July 1992 Heisei. 4652. Heemann, V., U. Brümmer, C. Paulsen, and F. Seehofer: Composition of the leaf surface gum of some Nicotiana species and Nicotiana tabacum cultivars; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 133–135. 4653. Heemann, V., A.-M. Bylov, U. Brümmer, W. Hass, and F. Seehofer: 3,7,11,15-Cembratetraen-6-ol, a new cembranoid from tobacco. III; Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C. Biosci. 38 (1983) 517–518. 4654. VOID 4655. Hege, R.B. Jr.: Gas chromatographic determination of carbonate in tobacco; RDM, 1973, No. 28, October 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500606278 -6282. 4656. Heimer, Y.M.: Nitrate-induced development of the nitrate uptake system in plant cells; Plant Sci. Lett. 4 (1975) 137–139. 4657. Heisenberg, M. and G. Schram: Interference by a nucleosidase in the detection of ribonucleic acid polymerase in tobacco leaves; Z. Naturforsch. 20B (1965) 454–457. 4658. Helgeson, J.P., A.D. Budde, and G.T. Haberlach: Capsidol: A phytoalexin produced by tobacco callus tissues; Plant Physiol. (1978) Suppl. 318. 4659. Helling, C.S.: Nitrogen-oxygen relationships influencing the growth of plants; Dissertation Abstr. (1966) 6280–6281. 4660. Hiatt, A.J.: Preparation and some properties of soluble succinic dehydrogenase from higher plants; Plant Physiol. 36 (1961) 552–557. 4661. Hiatt, A.J.: Formic acid activation in plants. I. Purification, properties and distribution of formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase; Plant Physiol. 40 (1965) 184–188. 4662. Hing, F., M. Okazaki, and Y. Miura: Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on glucosylation of scopoletin to scopolin in tobacco tissue culture; Plant Physiol. 94 (1982) 810–813. 4663. Hirata, T., H. Hamada, T. Aoki, and T. Suga: Stereoselectivity of the reduction of carvone and dihydrocarvone by suspension cells of Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 21 (1982) 2209–2212. 4664. Hirata, T., Y.S. Lee, and T. Suga: The stereospecific hydroxylation of endocyclic ethylenic linkage in the biotransformation of A-terpinyl acetate with cultured suspension cells of Nicotiana tabacum; Chem. Lett. 1982 (1982) 671–674. 4665. Hocht, A.M., R.M. Rock, R.Y. Schmitz, F. Skoog, and N.J. Leonard: Cytokinins: Development of a potent antagonist; Proc. U.S. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68 (1971) 2606–2610. 4666. Hodgeson, E., E. Smith, and F.E. Guthrie: Two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography of tobacco alkaloid and related compounds; J. Chromat. 20 (1965) 176–177. 4666a. Hoffman, I., E.V. Perups, and H.V. Morley: Identification and determination of Dichlone residues in treated
4667.
4668.
4669.
4670.
4671.
4672.
4673.
4674.
4675.
4676.
4677.
4678.
4679. 4680.
4680a.
4681.
4682.
tobaccos; J. Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chem. 48 (1965) 1063–1066. Hohlt, H.E., D.N. Maynard, and A.V. Barker: Ammonium tolerance of some cultivated Solanaceae; J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95 (1970) 345–348. Holmsen, T.W. and A.L. Koch: An estimate of protein turnover in growing tobacco plants; Phytochemistry 3 (1964) 165–172. Hoshika, Y.: Simultaneous gas chromatographic analysis of lower fatty acids, phenols and indoles using a glass capillary column; J. Chromatog. 144 (1977) 181–189. Hsieh, S.T.: Status of phosphate compounds in tobacco leaves associated with phosphorus deficiency; Chung Kuo Nung Yeh Hua Hsueh Hui Chih (1970) 105–109. Hsu, S.C., R.L. Pollack, and R.D. Going: Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of sugars present in tobacco extracts; Am. Assoc. Dental Res. 45 (1981) 787–788. Hsu, W.P. and G.W. Miller: Coproporphyrinogenase in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.); Biochem. J. 117 (1970) 215–220. Hu, M.W., W.E. Bondinell, and D. Hoffmann: Chemical studies on tobacco smoke. XXII, Synthesis of carbon-14 labeled myosmine, nornicotine, and N’-nitrosonornicotine; J. Labeled Compd. 10 (1974) 79–88. Huang, J.-S. and R.N. Goodman: Relationship of phosphatidase activity to induction of the hypersensitive reaction in tobacco plants by bacteria; Trans. Mo. Acad. Sci. 3 (1969) 94, see Huang, J.-S. and R.N. Goodman: The relationship of phosphatidase activity to the hypersensitive reaction in tobacco induced by bacteria; Phytopathology 60 (1972) 1020–1021. Huisman, J.G., A. Bernards, P. Liebregts, M.G.T. Gebbink, and D. Stegwee: Qualitative and quantitative immunofluorescence studies of chloroplasts ferredoxin. Application to investigations of ferredoxin inheritance in Nicotiana hybrids; Planta 137 (1977) 279–286. Hutchinson, C.R.: Biosynthetic studies in Convularia majalis, Nicotiana tabacum, and Tulipa gesneriana. Part II. The metabolism of L-nicotianine in Nicotiana tabacum; Dissertation Abstr. (1971) 829. Iida, B., T. Matsuzaki, M. Sano, F. Suzuki, and S. Matsuyama: Chemical components of burley tobacco produced by new curing process; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 119 (1977) 1–11. Ivanov, N.G.: Higher aliphatic alcohols in the resins of Bulgarian Oriental tobaccos; Cent. Res. Dev. Tobacco, Bulgarian Tobaccos 4 (1974) 311–317. Ivanov, N.G., L. Gyuzeley, and A. Boneva: Combustibility of tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 111–116. Ivanov, N.G and I. Ognyanov: Composition of natural substances in Bulgarian tobacco; Compt. Rend. L’Acad. Bulgare Sci. 16 (1964) 293–296. Izard, C.: Recherches biochimiques sur la pigmentation de Nicotiana glauca Grah. [Biochemical investigations of the pigments of Nicotiana glauca Grah.]; Ann. Inst. Exp. Tabac. Bergerac 3 (1958) 67–76. Izard, C.: Contribution á l’étude des pigments du genre Nicotiana [Contribution to the study of the pigments of the genus Nicotiana]; Compt. Rend. 249 (1959) 2226–2228. Jachymczyk, W.: Solanesol and dolichol; Postepy Biochem. 11 (1965) 75–82.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1443
11/24/08 2:40:06 PM
1444
4683. Jack, A., N. Fannin, and L.P. Bush: Implications of reducing nornicotine accumulation in burley tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 33 (2007) 39–91. 4684. Jaspars, E.M.J. and H. Veldstra: An A-amylase from tobacco crown-gall tissue cultures. I. Purification and some properties of the enzyme pattern of A-amylase isoenzymes in different tobacco tissue; Physiol. Plantarum 18 (1965) 604–625. 4685. Jelesko, J., W. Heim, K. Sykes, S. Hildreth, R.-H. Lu, and J. Sun: Cloning and characterization of a Nicotiana tabacum methylputrescine oxidase transcript; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 32, 2007, p. 35. 4686. Jeong, T.M., M.S. Yong, and H.H. Nah: Sterol compositions in three solanaceous seed oils; Hanguk (China) 21 (1978) 51–57. 4687. Johnson, J., J. Guan, F. Perini, G. Shelar, J. Robards, and S. Haye: Implications of tobacco variety, stalk position, and construction parameters on the formation of polyaromatic amines; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 56, 2007, pp. 49–50. 4688. Johnson, R., R.H. Guderian, F. Eden, M.D. Chilton, M.P. Gordon, and E.W. Nester: Detection and quantitation of octopine in normal plant tissue and in crown gall tumors; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71 (1974) 536–539. 4689. Joyeux, T., C. LeMoigne, L. LeBec, G. LeBourvelles, and J.-M. Loureau: Paper tools to reduce formaldehyde and other carbonyl compounds in cigarette mainstream smoke; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 66, 2007, p. 55. 4690. Kaiser, R. and D. Lamparsky: Constituents of OsmanthusAbsolute; Helv. Chim. Acta 61 (1978) 2328–2335. 4691. Kajinami, S.: Investigations of the properties of some enzymes in Nocardia corallina and tobacco tissue; Dissertation Abstr. (1970) 3232. 4692. Kakabadse, G.J., B. Manohim, J.M. Wather, E.C. Weller and P. Woodbridge: Decomposition and determination of fluorine in biological materials; Nature 229 (1971) 626–627. 4693. Kakie, T.: Phosphorus metabolism in tobacco plants. Relation between ethanol-soluble phosphorus compounds with respect to photosynthesis and maturity of tobacco leaves; Hatano Tabako Shikenjo Hokoku (1969) 75–79. 4694. Kakie, T. and M. Makinoda: Saccharide metabolism of tobacco leaves during curing. I. Changes in saccharides and enzymes related to saccharide degradation of tobacco leaves during curing; Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi 41 (1973) 659–666. 4695. VOID 4696. Kapista, O.S., L.V. Zueva, I.P. Vinetski, V.T. Likhache, I.G. Bukh, V.A. Kunkh, V.S. Legeida, and S.S. Maliuta: Nature of beta-galactosidase in the culture of tobacco cells in connection with experiments in transgenosis of LAC+ character of Escherichia coli; Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 245 (1979) 465–468. 4697. Kasperbauer, M.J. and R.A. Reinert: Biological detection of phytochrome in callus tissue of Nicotiana tabacum L.; Nature 200 (1966) 744–745. 4698. Kawashima, N., N. Inoue, and M. Noma: Saccharopine from tobacco leaves; Phytochemistry 17 (1978) 991–992.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4699. Keglevic, D., B. Ladesic, and M. Pokorny: Biochemical studies in tobacco plants. IV. N-Malonylmethionine, metabolite of D-methionine in Nicotiana rustica; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 124 (1968) 443–449. 4700. Kelman, A. and E.B. Cowling: Cellulose of Pseudomonas solanacearum in relation to pathogenesis; Phytopathology 55 (1965) 148–155. 4701. Keys, A.J., C.J. Leaver, D.H.R. Barton, B.D. Brown, and D.A. Widdowson: Daucic acid and its occurrence in plants; Nature 232 (1971) 423–424. 4702. Kim, M.-J. and Y.-H. Kim: Determination of phenols in mainstream cigarette smoke by isotope dilution liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometer; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 20, 2007, pp. 26–27. 4703. Kinset, J.W. and F. Skoog: Biosynthesis of cytokinins in an autonomous tobacco callus strain; Plant Physiol. (1972) Suppl. 345. 4704. Kisaki, T., A. Imai, and N.E. Tolbert: Intracellular localization of enzymes related to photorespiration in green leaves; Plant Cell Physiol. 12 (1971) 267–273. 4705. Kisaki, T., S. Kirabayashi, and N. Yamo: Effect of the age of tobacco leaves on photosynthesis and photorespiration; Plant Cell Physiol. 14 (1973) 505–514. 4706. Kisaki, T., A. Koiwai, S. Maeda, Y. Mikami, and T. Sasaki: Transformation of tobacco alkaloids; Proc. 6th Internat. Tob. Sci. Cong. (1976) 172–173. 4707. Kisaki, T.S., S. Mizusaki, and E. Tamaki: G-Methylaminobutyraldehyde, a new intermediate in nicotine biosynthesis; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 117 (1966) 677–678. 4708. Kisban, C., M. Horvath, and L. Dezsi: Role of the root system in the regulation of enzyme levels in leaf tissues; Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hungary 10 (1964) 275–287. 4709. Kitamura, T.: Pharmacological properties of nicotine related derivatives, especially on nornicotine; Nippon Takurigaku Zasshi 54 (1958) 825–837. 4710. Kittilson, H.L.: A biochemical and genetical study of the anthocyanins and some related polyphenols present in various strains of Nicotiana tabacum and related species; Dissertation Abstr. (1967) 4247. 4711. Klus, H., H. Begutter, G. Scherer, A.R. Tricker, and F. Adlkofer: Tobacco-specific and volatile N-nitrosamines in environmental tobacco smoke of offices; Indoor Environ. 1 (1992) 348–350. 4712. Kocourek, J., M. Ticha, V. Jiracek, and J. Kostir: On the metabolism of 2-deoxyhexoses in higher plants; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 71 (1963) 497–500. 4712a. Kocourek, J., M. Ticha, and J. Kostir: Formation of ribulose in plants fed L-arabitol; Arch. Biochem. Biophys.108 (1964) 349–351. 4713. Kodama, H., T. Fujimori, and K. Kato: Isolation of a new terpene glucoside, 3-hydroxy-5,6-epoxy-B-ionyl-BD-glucopyranoside from flue-cured tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 941–944. 4714. Kodama, H., T. Fujimori, and K. Kato: Isolation of a new terpene glucoside, loliolide-B-D-glucopyranoside from flue-cured tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 46 (1982) 1409–1411. 4715. Kodama, H., T. Fujimori, and K. Kato: Glucosides of ionone-related compounds in several Nicotiana species; Phytochemistry 23 (1984) 583–585.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1444
11/24/08 2:40:06 PM
1445
Bibliography
4716. Kodama, H., T. Fujimori, and K. Kato: Nonvolatile constituents in tobacco. Part III. A nor-sesquiterpene glycoside, rishitin-B-sophoroside from tobacco; Phytochemistry 23 (1984) 690–692. 4717. Kodama, H., T. Fujimori, and K. Kato: Nonvolatile constituents in tobacco. Part IV. Three new sesquiterpenoid glycosides from tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 49 (1985) 2537–2541. 4718. Koiwai, A. and T. Kisaki: Changes in glycolipids and phospholipids of tobacco leaves during flue-curing; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 597–602. 4719. Kolattukudy, P.E.: Further evidence for an elongationdecarboxylation mechanism in the biosynthesis of paraffins in leaves; Plant Physiol. 3 (1968) 375–383. 4720. Kollman, V.H., J.L. Hanners, J.Y. Hutson, T.W. Whaley, D.G. Otto, and C.T. Gregg: Large-scale photosynthetic production of carbon-13 labeled sugars: The tobacco leaf system; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 50 (1973) 826–831. 4721. Korenkov, V., B. King, G.J. Wagner, and K. Hirschi: The impact of Arabidopsis CAX gene expression on leaf cadmium accumulation in field grown tobacco; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 34, 2007, p. 36. 4722. Kosowska, A.: Determination of organic and inorganic salts in healthy and virus X-infected tobacco leaves using conductometric methods; Acta Microbiol. Polon 7 (1958) 51–64. 4723. Kovacs, E.I.: Can promine and restine be found in tobacco genetic tumors. Comments; Acta Agron. Acad. Sci. Hungary 23 (1974) 240–243. 4724. Kozlowska, A.: Effect of molybdenum on virus-like symptoms on tobacco plants and RNA transformation in Nicotiana tabacum; Zesz. Probl. Postepow Nauk Roln. 198 (1978) 181–209. 4725. Kuboi, T. and Y. Yamada: Caffeic acid-O-methyltransferase in a suspension of cell aggregates; Phytochemistry 15 (1976) 397–400. 4726. Kurtzman, R.H. Jr: Part I. Inhibition and stimulation of tobacco mosaic virus by purines. Part II. Healthy host enzymes for screening antiviral agents; Dissertation Abstr. (1959) 478–479. 4727. Kuznetsova, L.G., L.A. Oparina, V.S. Polevaya, and N.G. Doman: Pathways of carbon utilization by tobacco tissue cultures; Biokhimiya 37 (1972) 317–321. 4728. Ladesic, B., M. Pokorny, and D. Keglevic: Metabolic patterns of L- and D-serine in higher and lower plants; Phytochemistry 10 (1971) 3085–3091. 4729. Ladyfina, M.E., M.I. Tukeeva, and V.P. Aksevov: Activity and localization of succinyl-coasynthetase in tobaccoleaves during viral-infection; Soviet Plant Physiol. 22 (1975) 1100–1105. 4730. VOID 4731. Latimer, P.H. Jr: A preliminary investigation of the pyrolysis-gas chromatography of polymers, tobaccos and starch derivatives; RDR, 1966, No. 18, May 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500967170 -7211. 4732. Lauterbach, J.H.: What would you regulate if you were the regulator in charge of cigarettes? 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 38, 2007, pp. 38–39. 4733. Lauterbach, J.H.: How can you have transfer without smoke? The story on sugar-ammonia chemistry that
4734.
4734.
4736.
4736a.
4737.
4738.
4739. 4740.
4741. 4742.
4743.
4744.
4745.
4746.
4747.
4748.
did not get the Pulitzer prize; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 59, 2007, p. 51. Lawyer, A.L. and I. Zelitch: Inhibition of glutamate: Glyoxylate aminotransferase activity in tobacco leaves and callus by glycidate, an inhibitor of photorespiration; Plant Physiol. 61 (1978) 242–247. Lee, Y.S., T. Hirata, and T. Suga: Biotransformation of 1-acetoxy-p-menth-4(8)-ene with a suspension of cultured cells of Nicotiana tabacum; J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 (1983) 2475–2478. Leete, E., G.B. Beden, and M.F. Manuel: Fermentation of 5-fluoronicotine from 5-fluoronicotinic acid in Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 10 (1971) 2687–2692. Leete, E., E.G. Gros, and T.J. Gilbertson: Biosynthesis of the pyrrolidine ring of nicotine: Feeding experiments with N-15-labelled ornithine-2-C14; Tetrahedron Lett. (1964) 587–592. Legrand, M., B. Fritig, and L. Hirth: Enzymes of the phenylpropanoid pathway and the necrotic reaction of hypersensitive tobacco mosaic virus; Phytochemistry 15 (1976) 1353–1359. Leienbach, K.W., V. Heeger, and W. Barz: Metabolism of nicotinic acid in plant cell suspension cultures. IV. Occurrence and metabolism of nicotinic acid N-Aarabinoside; Hoppe-Seyler’s Zeitsch. Physiol. Chem. 357 (1976) 1089–1095. Lengyel, P. and S. Ochoa: Phosphorolysis of leaf ribonucleic acids; Biochim. Biophys. 28 (1958) 200–201. Leppik, R.A., D.W. Hollomon, and W. Bottomley: Queisone: An inhibitor of the germination of Peronospora tabacina conidia; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 2055–2063. VOID Lester, R.L. and K. Kaul: Isolation and characterization of the inositol containing sphingolipids of tobacco and the development of relatively selective methods for the removal of these constituents from tobacco; Proc. Univ. KY Tobacco Health Workshop Conf. (1973) 777–786. Levasseur, G., J. Filion, and M.J. Kaiserman: Less hazardous: Fact or fiction? The Canadian experience; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 19, 2007, p. 26. Levasseur, G., J. Filion, and M.J. Kaiserman: Trend of nicotine levels in Canadian cigarettes (1968–2005); 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 21, 2007, p. 27. Levasseur, G., H. Hutchings, J. Filion, and M.J. Kaiserman: Little cigars, big concerns; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 18, 2007, pp. 25–26. Levins, R.J.: Isolation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons from whole smoke condensate: A simple two-step procedure; Chromatagraphia 11 (1978) 736. Li, P., B.-B. Lu, J. Hu, C.-J. Ru, Y.-L. Zong, and J.-P. Xie: Deoxyfructosazine, its mass production and flavor in cigarette; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 72, 2007, pp. 58–59. Lippincott, J.A. and B.B. Lippincott: Influence of age and medium on certain enzyme activities in tissue cultures; Plant Physiol. (1963) Suppl.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1445
11/24/08 2:40:06 PM
1446
4749. Lloyd, R.A. Jr: Reemtsma cigarette products. Additive analysis; RDM, 1976, No. 39, December 8, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500607242 -7255. 4750. Lloyd, R.A. Jr: Essential oil comparison: Brazilian tobaccos, Amarelinho and CD-2; MFR, 1977, No. 1, September 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504166165 -6167. 4751. Lloyd, R.A. Jr, C.W. Miller, and P.H. Ayers: A comparative study of tobacco essential oils and additives in Merit, Marlboro and other cigarette products; RDM, 1976, No. 21, April 27, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500616781 -6809. 4751a. Lob, H.S.: Cigarette smoking and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: A hypothesis; Irish J. Med. 142 (1973) 174–178. 4752. Loche, J. and J. Chouteau: Growth conditions influencing polyphenol levels in tobacco plants; Bull. Soc. Fr. Physiol. Veg. 13 (1967) 327–334. 4752a. Lago, R.C.A., E. Kazan, F.D. Nogueira, and M.L. Cosenza: The composition of Brazilian tobacco seed oil; Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 13 (1978) 93–102. 4753. Lotti, G. and R. Izzo: The composition of tobacco seed oil; Il Tobacco 74 (1971) 19–23. 4754 Louria, D.B.: Mycotoxines and mycotoxicoces. Aflatoxin-like substances in tobacco; Ann. Parasit. Hum. Comp. 46 (1971) 172. 4755. Low, H.: Nitroso compounds - Safety and public health; Arch. Envir. Hlth. 29 (1974) 256–260. 4756. Lucas, G.B., R.W. Pero, J.P. Snow, and D. Harvan: Analysis of tobacco for the alternaria toxins, alternariol and alternariol monomethyl ether; J. Agr. Food Chem. 19 (1972) 1274–1275. 4757. Luis, S., B. Walther, S. Peter, and D. Nikolaus: Fungicide residues in tobacco after treatment of tobacco crops in the field; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 11 (1970) 184–190. 4758. Lundeen, C.V., H.N. Wood, and A.C. Braun: Intracellular levels of cyclic nucleotides during cell enlargement and cell division in excised tobacco pith tissue; Differentiation 1 (1973) 255–260. 4759. MacNicol, P.K.: Metabolic regulation in the senescing tobacco leaf. II. Changes in glycolic metabolite levels in the detached leaf; Plant Physiol. 51 (1973) 798–801. 4760. MacNicol, P.K.: Analysis of adenine nucleotide and metabolic intermediates in mature and senescent leaf tissue; Ann. Biochem. 45 (1972) 624–633. 4761. Maier, V.P.: Aspects of plant phenolic chemistry; Proc. Plant Phenolics Group of North America (1964). 4762. Makarov, A.D. and L.F. Stakhov: Chemical nature of phosphodoxin. A photophosporylation co-factor; Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR Ser. Biol. 191 (1970) 237–239. 4763. Malaison, E., G. Levasseur, J. Fillion, and M.J. Kaiserman: The identification of tobacco smoke emissions related to toxicity/mutagenicity; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 12, 2007, pp. 22–23. 4764. Mann, D.F. and R.U. Byerrum: Activation of the de novo pathway for pyridine nucleotide biosynthesis prior to ricinine biosynthesis in castor beans; Plant Physiol. 53 (1974) 603–609. 4765. Marias, J.: In situ determination of radio-phosphorus in tobacco plants; South Afr. J. Agr. Sci. 11 (1969) 423–427. 4766. Marke, M.P. and C.B. Drews: Separation of nicotine alkaloids by capillary gas-chromatography; Z. Anal. Chem. 242 (1968) 248–249.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4767. Markosyan, D.E., A.I. Pirverdvan, and L.P. Perepechkin: Cellulose acetate fibers for cigarette filters; Khim. Volokna 12 (1970) 64–66. 4768. Martin, C. and G. Morel: High Level of phenolic compounds in virus affected plants; Compt. Rend. 246 (1958) 2283–2286. 4769. Martin-Tanguy, J., C. Martin, and M. Gallet: Putrescinebound aromatic compounds in virus-infected Nicotiana; Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. 276 (1973) 1433–1435. 4770. Matsueda, T., Y. Kurokawa, Y. Osaki, H. Hirakawa, and T. Iida: Effect of cigarette smoking on the concentration of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in indoor air; Kankyo Kagaku 2 (1992) 791–799. 4771. Matsukura, M., K. Takahashi, M. Kawamoto, S. Ishiguro, and H. Matsushita: Identification of 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2-(5H)-furanone (Sotolone) in roasted tobacco volatiles; Agr. Biol. Chem. 49 (1985) 3335–3337. 4772. Matsumoto, T., G. Sakata, Y. Tachibana, and K. Fukui: Stereochemistry of nucleophilic addition. IV. Condensation of 2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexanone with tert-butyl acetate in the presence of lithium amide; Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan 45 (1972) 1147–1152. 4773. Matsushita, T. and F.F. Davis: Studies of pseudouridylic acid synthetase from various sources; Biochim. Biophys. Acta 238 (1971) 165–173. 4774. Matsuzaki, T., A. Koiwai, and N. Kawashima: Isolation of tetra-, penta-, hexa- and heptaacyl glycerides from stigmas of Nicotiana tabacum; Agr. Biol. Chem. 47 (1983) 77–82. 4775. Matsuzaki, T., A. Koiwai, and S. Kupp: 1,3-Diacylglycerol and 1,2-diacylglycerol types multiacylglycerol in stigma lipids of tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 50 (1986) 1581–1587. 4776. Matsuzaki, T., Y. Shinozaki, M. Hagimori, T. Tobita, H. Shigematsu, and A. Koiwai: Novel glycerolipids and glycolipids from the surface lipids of Nicotiana benthamiana; Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 56 (1992) 1565–1569. 4777. Mazelis, M. and B. Vennesland: Carbon dioxide fixation into oxalacetate in higher plants; Plant Physiol. 32 (1957) 591–600. 4778. McCloskey, J.A., B. Basile, K. Kimura, and T. Hashizume: Presence and levels of cis- and trans-methylthiozeatin riboside and cis- and trans-zeatin ribodise in tobacco plant determined by mass spectrometry; Proc. Jap. Acad. Ser. B 57 (1981) 276–281. 4779. McKennis, H. Jr, L.B. Turnbull, H.B. Wingfield, and C.B. Dewey: Cotinine pathway of nicotine metabolism; Am. Chem. Soc. Mtg. (1957). 4780. McKenzie, J.L., R.M. Ikeda, T.R. Terrill, D.G. Vickroy, and D.B. Walters (editors): Recent advances in the chemical composition of tobacco and tobacco smoke, Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp., New Orleans, LA (1977). 4781. Medina-Bolivar, F., C. Nopo-Olazabal, L. NopoOlazabal, G. Sivakumar, and J. Condori: Screening for bioactive stilbenes in the genus Nicotiana; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 33 (2007) 93–100. 4782. VOID 4783. Mendel, R.R. and A.J. Mueller: A common genetic determinant of zanthine dehydrogenase and nitrate reductase in Nicotiana tabacum; Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 170 (1976) 638–641. 4784. VOID
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1446
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
1447
Bibliography
4785. Michailov, M.K.: Flavonoids of polyphenol group of tobacco; Studies by methods of paper chromatography; Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 108 (1956) 511–514. 4786. Michailov, M.K.: Polyphenols in tobacco by paper chromatography. I. Flavone derivatives; Acta Chim. Hung. 10 (1957) 421–425. 4786a. Miller, C.W., J.P. Dickerson, and C.E. Rix: Tobacco product; U.S. Patent No. 3,996,941 (1976). 4786b. Miller, C.W. and R.A. Lloyd Jr: Investigation of the flavor loss in the M2000 process; RDM, 1975, No. 14. March 18, see www.rjrtdocscom 512333645 -3652. 4787. Miller, C.W., M.P. Newell, N.C. Sanders Jr, and R.A. Lloyd Jr: Smoke comparison: Winston test vs. Winston control; RDM, 1977, No. 7, March 4, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500617084 -7093. 4788. Miller, L.B.: Beta-glycoside formation in plants from absorbed chemicals; Boyce Thompson Inst. 13 (1943) 185. 4789. Milne, D.L.: A study of the nutrition of the cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne F. (Coleoptera:Anobiidae) and a suggested new method for its control; J. Entomol. Sec. South Africa 26 (1963) 43–63. 4790. Mizukami, H., T. Terao, H. Miura, and H. Ohashi: Glycosylation of salicyl alcohol in cultured plant cells; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 679–680. 4791. Mizusaki, S., Y. Tanabe, M. Noguchi, and E. Tamaki: N-Methylputrescine oxidase from tobacco roots; Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 2757–2762. 4792. Mizusaki, S., Y. Tanabe, M. Noguchi, and E. Tamaki: Changes in the activities of ornithine decarboxylase, putrescine N-methyltransferase and N-methyl putrescine oxidase in tobacco roots in relation to nicotine biosynthesis; Plant Cell Physiol. 14 (1973) 103–110. 4793. Mohapatra, S.C. and W.H. Johnson: Characterization of changes in bright leaf tobacco during the drying phase of curing; 28th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 28, Paper No. 22, 1974, p. 18. 4794. Mokhnachev, I.G., N.A. Sherstyanykh, and L.A. Dulan: Volatile bases of tobacco and tobacco smoke; Ber. Inst. Tabakforsch. Dresden 16 (1969) 93–102. 4795. Molchanov, A.M., Y.G. Sukharev, V.I. Razdol’kina, and A.K. Obraztsova: Composition of waste gases during drying of Nicotiana rustica; Tabak (Moscow) 32 (1971) 22–23. 4796. Moldoveanu, S.C.: Quantitative analysis of phenols in the smoke of various commercial cigarettes; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 46, 2007, p. 44. 4797. Moldoveanu, S.C. and W.M. Coleman III: Evaluation of the retention by humans of solanesol from mainstream cigarette smoke; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 26, 2007, pp. 30–31. 4798. Molin, W.T., C.G. Wilkerson Jr, and R.C. Fites: Thiamin phosphorylation by thiamin pyrophosphotransferase during seed germination; Plant Physiol. 66 (1980) 313–315. 4799. Moore, A.E. and B.A. Stone: Effect of senescence and hormone treatment on the activity of a B-1,3-glucan hydrolase in Nicotiana glutinosa leaves; Planta 104 (1972) 93–109. 4800. Morée-Testa, P. and L. DeSelles; The neutral-carbonyl fraction of cigarette smoke condensate. Identification of
4801.
4802.
4802a. 4803. 4804.
4805.
4806. 4807. 4808.
4808a.
4809.
4810.
4810a. 4811.
4812.
4813.
4813a.
4814.
4815.
the principal components; Ann. Tabac SEITA 14 (1976) 45–49. Morée-Testa, P., Y. Saint-Jalm, and A. Testa: Identification and determination of the phenolic acids of tobacco smoke; Tob. Int. 187 (1985) 49–55. Mori, K., M. Ohki, K. Okada, Y. Takei, and M. Matsui: Synthesis of dl-3-hydroxydihydro-B-davascone and dihydro-B-davascone; Agr. Biol. Chem. 37 (1973) 2907–2911. Mothes, K.: The metabolism of urea and ureides; Can. J. Botany 170 (1961) 1785–1807. Moyed, H.S. and H.E. Umbarger: Regulation of biosynthetic pathways; Physiol. Rev. 42 (1962) 444–466. Nadkarni, R.A. and G.H. Morrison: Multielement instrumental neutron activation analysis of biological materials; Anal. Chem. 45 (1973) 1957–1960. Nagasaura, M.: 1956 Studies on the hemicellulose in tobacco leaves; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 96 (1956) 48–49. Naguib, M.I.: Colorimetric separation of plant polysaccharides; Zucker 16 (1963) 34–36. Nanda, R.S.: Fluoride content of North Indian foods; Indian J. Med. Res. 60 (1973) 1470–1472. Neufield, E.F., V. Ginsburg, E.W. Putman, and D. Fanshier: Formation and interconversion of sugar nucleotide by plant extract; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (1957) 602–616. Neumann, C.L.: Use of d-nicotine in tobacco; CIM, 1974, No. 2, January 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504168487 -8488. Neurath, G.B.: Recent advances in knowledge of chemical composition of tobacco smoke; 162nd National Meeting of the Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC, Division of Agricultural and Food Chemistry Section, Paper No. 59, 1971. Neurath, G., M. Dünger, J. Gewe, W. Lüttich, and H. Wichern: Volatile bases (primary and secondary aliphatic, aromatic, and heterocyclic amines); CORESTA Inform. Bull. (1966) 3112. New Smoking Materials Limited, Gt. Britain: NSM Technical Information - Smoke Analysis. III (1977). Nishida, T., I. Wahlberg, K. Nordfors, C. Vogt, and C.R. Enzell: Application of 2D-NMR spectroscopy in the structural determination of a new tobacco cembranoid; Tetrahedron Lett. 25 (1984) 1299–1302. Nishikawaji, S., T. Fujimori; S. Matsushima, and K. Kato: Sesquiterpenoids from flue-cured tobacco leaves; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 1819–1820. Nishinari, N. and K. Syono: Identification of cytokinins associated with mitosis in synchronously cultured tobacco cells; Plant Cell Physiol. 21 (1980) 383–393. Nishizawa, O.: Chilling-resistant plants with modified membrane lipid composition expressing a cDNA for a heterologous acyltransferase; WO 9213082 A1, 6 Aug 1992. See, Nishizawa, O.: Chilling-resistant plants and their production. U.S. Patent No. 5,516,667 (1996). Noguchi, M., T. Fukuzuni, H. Kaneko, T. Fujimori, T. Churman, and Y. Tokogi: 1,4-Epoxy-2,10-dihydroxy-7 -isopropyl-4-methyl-5E-undecene and its diacetate. A tobacco flavoring; Jpn. Kouitokkyo Koho (1979). Noguchi, M., A. Koiwai, and E. Tamaki: Studies on nitrogen metabolism in tobacco plants. Part VII. D-Pyrroline5-carboxylate reductase from tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. (Tokyo) 30 (1966) 452–456.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1447
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
1448
4816. Nolet, M.-C., G. Levasseur, J. Filion, and M.J. Kaiserman: Emission and constituent analysis of counterfeit and illicit cigarettes found in Canada; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 17, 2007, p. 25. 4817. Nolet, M.-C., G. Levasseur, J. Filion, and M.J. Kaiserman: Trend in nicotine levels in Canadian cigarettes from 2000 to 2005; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 22, 2007, pp. 27–28. 4817a. Noma, M., N. Inoue, N. Kawashima, and M. Noguchi: Metabolism of 5-acetoamino-2-hydroxyvaleric acid in tobacco leaves; Phytochemistry 17 (1978) 991–992. 4818. VOID 4819. Noma, M., F. Suzuki, K. Gamou, and N. Kawashima: Two labdane diterpenoids from Nicotiana raimondii; Phytochemistry 21 (1982) 395–397. 4820. Novotny, M. M.L. Lee, C.E. Low, and M.P. Maskarinec: High-resolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometric analysis of tobacco and marijuana sterols; Steroids 27 (1976) 665–673. 4821. Odintsova, M.S., M.V. Rskovokaya, and N.M. Sisakyan: The activity of some enzymes of phosphorus metabolism in chloroplasts isolated in a nonaqueous medium; Biokhimiya 28 (1964) 502–507. 4822. Ohnishi, A., M. Chinju, and K. Kato: Isolation and characterization of cuticular polyester from the leaf of Nicotiana tabacum; Agr. Biol. Chem. 47 (1983) 975–981. 4823. Okamoto, H. and D. Yoshida: The isolation and identification of mutation enhancing principles from cellulose pyrolysates; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 1291–1293. 4824. Oleson, A.E., E.T. Clark, and A.M. Janski: Extracellular phosphohydrolases from suspension cultures of Nicotiana; Phytochemistry 13 (1974) 2113–2116. 4825. Olson, A.C.: Phytase secreted from tobacco cells grown in suspension culture; In Vitro 7 (1972) 252–253. 4826. Ongun, A., W.W. Thomson, and J.B. Mudd: Lipid composition of chloroplasts isolated by aqueous and nonaqueous techniques; J. Lipid Res. 9 (1968) 409–415. 4827. Ordin, L., M.J. Garber, J.I. Kindinger, S.A. Whitmore, C. Greve, and O.C. Taylor: Effect of peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) in vivo on tobacco leaf polysaccharide synthetic pathway enzymes; Environ. Sci. Technol. 5 (1971) 621–626. 4828. Pacos, V., E. Werstiuk, and R.H. Hall: Conversion of N6-($2-isopentoxyl)adenosine to adenosine by enzyme activity in tobacco tissue; Plant Physiol. 48 (1971) 775–778. 4829. Pailer, M. and W.J. Hübsch: Effect of the treatment of tobacco with extremely high levels of ethylene oxide on tobacco constituents except nicotine; Fachliche Mitt. Österr. Tabakregie 8 (1967) 140. 4830. Park, J.-W., S.-H. Kim, J.-Y. Kim, C.-R. Kim, and M. Rhee: The scavenger effects of various antioxidants in cigarette filters on the free radicals in mainstream smoke; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 14, 2007, pp. 23–24. 4831. Park, K.-H., A. Sakurai, and N. Takahashi: Gibberellins in callus of crown gall; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 2955–2956. 4832. Parrish, M.E., B.W. Good, F.S. Hsu, F.W. Hatch, D.M. Ennis, D.R. Douglas, J.H. Shelton, and D.C. Watson:
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4832a.
4833.
4834.
4835.
4836.
4837.
4837a.
4838.
4839.
4840.
4841.
4841a.
4842.
4843. 4844.
4845.
4846. 4847.
Computer-enhanced high-resolution gas chromatography for the discriminative analysis of tobacco smoke; Anal. Chem. 53 (1981) 826–831. Pattanayak, G.K., A.K. Biswal, V.S. Reddy, and B.C. Tripathy: Light-dependent regulation of chlorophyll b biosynthesis in chlorophyllide a oxygenase overexpressing tobacco plants; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 326 (2005) 466–471. Perez, C., B. Michelet, V. Ferrant, P. Bogaerts, and M. Boutry: Differential expression within a three-gene subfamily encoding a plasma membrane hydrogen ion-ATPase in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia; J. Biol. Chem. 267 (1992) 1204–1211. Perkins, G.L. and L. Lovrekovich: Enzyme levels in tobacco leaf tissues affected by the Wildfire toxin; Phytopathology 55 (1965) 519–524. Perl, M., R. Gafni, and R.N. Beachy: Phosphodiesterase activities in transgenic tobacco plants associated with the movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus; Theor. Appl. Genet. 84 (1992) 730–734. Petushkov, A.A., M.R. Zel’tser, and A.P. Medvedovskii: Content of 228Th in tobacco and the human body; Cig. Sanit. 37 (1972) 114. Phelps, R.H. and L. Sequeira: Synthesis of indoleacetic acid via tryptamine by a cell-free system from tobacco terminal buds; Plant Physiol. 42 (1967) 1161–1163. Pictet, A. and G. Court: Einige neue Pflanzenalkaloide [Some new vegetable alkaloids]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 40 (1908) 3771–3783. Pierpoint, W.S.: Mitochondrial preparations from the leaves of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). 3. Glycollic oxidase and fumarase activity; Biochem. J. 75 (1960) 511–515. Pierpoint, W.S.: Mitochondrial preparations from the leaves of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). 4. Separation of some components by density-gradient centrifuging; Biochem. J. 82 (1962) 143–148. Pinder, A.R.: Alkaloids of tobacco; in: Chemistry of carbon compounds: A modern comprehensive treatise, Volume IV, Part C, Heterocyclic compounds, edited by E.H. Rodd, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1960) pp. 1818–1823. Pittnerova, Z., P. Kovacs, and A. Jindra: Carboxylase activity in the tobacco plant, Nicotiana tabacum; Acta Fac. Pharm. (1969) 157–162. Poda-Chikalenko, V.T.: Some biological changes on the growing together of grafts; Izvest. Sibr. Otdel. Akad. Nauk SSSR (1960) 91–102. Polloc, B.M. and P. Filner: Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesizing systems of growing and non-growing cultured tobacco cells; Plant Physiol. (1970) Suppl. 158. Pollock, G.A. and W.W. Kilgore: Toxaphene; Residue Rev. 69 (1978) 87–140. Pozsar, B.I.: Ratio of chlorophyll and pheophytin components in tobacco leaves; Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hungary 5 (1959) 87–96. Prather, C.W. and E.C. Sisler: Glycine and glyoxylate decarboxylation in Nicotiana rustica roots: Phytochemistry 11 (1972) 1637–1647. Pusztai, A.: Hexosamines in the seeds of higher plants (spermatophytes); Nature 201 (1964) 1328–1329. Quick, W.P., K. Fichtner, E.D. Schulze, R. Wendler, R.C. Leegood, H. Mooney, S.R. Rodermel, L. Bogorad, and M. Stitt: Decreased ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase in transgenic tobacco transformed
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1448
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
Bibliography
4848.
4849.
4850.
4851.
4852.
4853. 4854.
4854a. 4855.
4856.
4857.
4858.
4859.
4860.
4861.
4862.
4863.
4864.
4865.
with antisense rbcS. IV. Impact on photosynthesis in conditions of altered nitrogen supply; Planta 188 (1992) 522–531. Rangaswani, G. and M. Balasubramanian: Presence of amino acids and indole compounds in the root-knot affected plants; Indian Phytopathol. 17 (1965) 234–237. Rashid, A. and M.A. Shah: Chemical evaluation of some flue cured tobacco varieties; Proc. Pakistan Sci. Conf. 25 (1974) 1–22. Ravinshankai, G.A. and A.R. Mehtag: Genetic manipulation of somatic hybrid plant cells; Proc. Natl. Symp. Plant Tissue Cult. (1980) 342–352. Reid, W.W.: The action of inhibitors on the incorporation of [214C]mevalonate into the triterpenes and sterols on Nicotiana tabacum; Biochem. Soc. Mtg. London (1966). Rennenberg, H., R. Steinkamp, and J. Kesselmeier: 5-Oxo-prolinase in Nicotiana tabacum: Catalytic properties and subcellular localization; Physiol. Plantarum 52 (1981) 211–216. Reuveny, Z.: Regulation of ATP sulfurylase in cultured tobacco cells; Dissertation Abstr. (1975) 4450. Richter, M.: On the composition of essential oils in tobacco. III. Communication; Beitr. Inst. Tabakforsch. (Dresden) (1974) 52–60. Riehl, T.F. and J.E. Kennedy Jr: Tobacco product; U.S. Patent No. 3,563,248 (1971). Ripperger, H. and K. Schneiber: Nicotianamine and analogous amino acids. Endogenous iron carriers in higher plants; Heterocycles 17 (1982) 447–461. Rix, C.E.: Headspace analysis of puffed cereal grains used as tobacco extenders; RDM, 1975, No. 21, May 20, see www.rjrtdocs.com 510691749 -1757. Rix, C.E.: Transfer of Dicamba from cigarettes to smoke; Memorandum, June 12, 1987, see www.rjrtdocs. com 506468461 -8464. Rix, C.E.: Transfer of Formothion and Thiodan from tobacco to smoke; R&DM, 1987, No. 119, August 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511496118 -6122. Rix, C.E.: Analysis of Freon-123 in tobacco using headspace gas chromatography; R&DM, 1989, No. 7, January 9, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508280674 -0692. Rix, C.E.: Analysis of sulfur hexafluoride in tobacco using headspace gas chromatography; R&DM, 1989, No. 272, October 6, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508295957 -5970. Robinson, J.C.: A study of free radicals produced from tobacco smoke and its polycyclic aromatic constituents; Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Waterloo, Canada (1969). Rodinovskaya, L.A., O.P. Bogomolova, A.M. Shestopalov, and V.P. Litvinov: Regio- and stereoselective synthesis of the tobacco alkaloid nicotelline and its functionally substituted analogs; Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk 324 (1992) 585–588. Rueppel, M.L. and N. Rapopet: Abberant alkaloid biosynthesis. Formation of nicotine analogs from unnatural precursors in Nicotiana glutinosa; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93 (1971) 7021–7028. Runeckles, V.C. and K. Woolrich: Tobacco phenols. I. The biosynthesis of O-glucosides and O-glucose esters of hydroxycinnamic acids; Phytochemistry 2 (1963) 1–6. Ryan, C.A., J. Demoura, and T. Kuo: The regulation by light of the accumulation of a proteinase inhibitor in detached tobacco leaves; Am. Soc. Plant. Physiol. Mtg. (1971).
1449
4866. Sander, V.J.; Studies of the development of cancerogenic nitroso compounds in the stomach of experimental animals and their consequences for man; Arzneim.-Forsch. 21 (1971) 2034–2039. 4867. Sanders, N.C. Jr: Headspace of Marlboro blend components; RDM, 1979, No. 25, June 29, see www.rjrtdocs. com 500608598 -8603. 4868. Schaefer, P.C., F. De Reinach, and G. Ourisson: Conversion of parkeol into its 24,25-epoxide by tissue cultures of Nicotiana tabacum; Eur. J. Biochem. 14 (1970) 284–288. 4869. Schneider, H.A.W.: Light mediated increase in activity of porphobilinogen deaminase/uroporphyrinogen. III. Cosynthetase and d-aminolevulinate dehydratase in tissue cultures of tobacco; Phytochemistry 10 (1971) 319–321. 4870. Schneider, H.A.W.: Porphyrin synthesis in isolated particles from tissue cultures of tobacco; Z. Naturforsch. 26B (1971) 908–912. 4871 Schroeder, H.A. and J.J. Balassa: Abnormal trace metals in man: Germanium; J. Chronic Dis. 20 (1967) 211–224. 4872. Schueeto, H.R., W. Maier, and K. Mothes: Methylputrescine as a possible precursor of nicotine in Nicotiana rustica; Acta Biochem. Pol. 13 (1966) 401–404. 4873. Scott, K.J., J. Daly, and H.H. Smith: Effects of indoleacetic acid and kinetin on activities of enzymes of the hexose monophosphate shunt in tissue cultures of Nicotiana; Plant Physiol. 39 (1964) 709–711. 4874. Scott, T.A. and A.L. Devonshire: The incorporation of [14C4] aspartic acid into nicotinic acid N-glucoside in Nicotiana tabacum; Biochem. J. 124 (1971) 949–950. 4875. Sengupta, A. and U.K. Mazumder: Triglyceride composition of tobacco seed oil; J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 53 (1976) 680–683. 4876. Sequeira, L.: Origin of indoleacetic acid in tobacco plants infected by Psuedomonas solanacearum; Phytopathology 55 (1965) 1232–1236. 4877. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, and O.T. Chortyk: Simple conversion of two standard gas chromatographs to all-glass capillary systems; J. High Resol. Chrom. Comm. 3 (1980) 11–15. 4878. Sharon, A., B.A. Bailey, J.P. McMurtry, R. Taylor, and J.D. Anderson; Characteristics of ethylene biosynthesisinducing xylanase movement in tobacco leaves; Plant Physiol. 100 (1992) 2059–2065. 4879. Shaw, J.G.: Enzymic degradation of adenosine triphosphate to adenine by tobacco leaf extracts and its relationship to measurements of polyribonucleotide synthesis; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 109 (1965) 627–633. 4880. Shelar, G.R.: Analysis of theobromine in raw materials and tobacco products by the indirect determination of caffeine; RDM, 1979, No. 37, September 26, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500608917 -8928. 4881. Shimizu, S., R. Hotta, and E. Tamaki: Metabolism of chlorophyll in higher plants. III. Pheophytins, as one of the color components of some tobacco varieties; Bot. Mag. Tokyo 79 (1966) 560–565. 4882. Shimazaki, M. and A. Ohta: Asymmetric synthesis of (-)-(E)-5-hydroxy-5-isopropyl-3-hepten-2-one, a cembrane-derived compound from Greek tobacco; Synthesis 10 (1992) 957–958. 4883. Shimoura, T. and T. Hirai: Amounts of lipids in tobacco leaves and the turnover in the course of tobacco mosaic virus infection; Phytopath. Z. 48 (1963) 421–433.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1449
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
1450
4884. Shlyk, A.A., V.I. Gaponenko, and T.V. Kukhtenko: C14 kinetics of chlorophyll turnover in barley and tobacco plants; Fiziol. Rast. 9 (1962) 521–533. 4885. Shlyk, A.A., V.I. Gaponenko, and T.V. Kukhtenko: C14 kinetics of chlorophyll turnover in barley and tobacco plants; Soviet Plant Physiol. 9 (1963) 419–426. 4885a. Siminszky, B., L. Gavilano, M. Chakrabarti, R.E. Dewey, and S.W. Bowen: Evolution of nicotine N-demethylase genes and their use in reducing nornicotine levels in tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 33 (2007) 27–38. 4886. Simons, T.J. and A.F. Ross: Metabolic Changes associated with systemic induced resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in Samsun NN tobacco; Phytopathology 61 (1971) 293–300. 4887. Simpson, R., A. Johnson, and R. Severson: Leaf surface chemistry of tobacco budworm resistant and susceptible tobacco grown in the field and greenhouse at different fertilization rates; Tob. Int. 187 (1985) 89–91. 4888. Sindelar, L. and O. Makovcova: Activity of phosphatases and content of free saccharides in Nicotiana tabacum cv Samsun infected by Potato Y virus; Biol. Plant 16 (1974) 376–381. 4889. Singh, S., D.S. Letham, and L.M.S. Palni: Cytokinin biochemistry in relation to leaf senescence. VII. Endogenous cytokinin levels and exogenous applications of cytokinins in relation to sequential leaf senescence of tobacco; Physiol. Plant 86 (1992) 388–397. 4890. Singh, S., D.S. Letham, and L.M.S. Palni: Cytokinin biochemistry in relation to leaf senescence. VIII. Translocation, metabolism and biosynthesis of cytokinins in relation to sequential leaf senescence of tobacco; Physiol. Plant 86 (1992) 398–406. 4891. Singhal, J.P., S. Khan, and O.P. Bansal: Titrimetric method for the determination of Oxamyl residues in crops and soils; Analyst 103 (1978) 872–875. 4892. Sisler, E.C.: Purification and identification of a new alkaloid from Cherry Red 401 tobacco; 17th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 17, Paper No. 31, 1963, p. 21. 4893. Slegers, G. and A. Claeys: Instrumental neutron-activation analysis of raw tobacco leaves imported in the Belgian-Luxembourg economic union; Med. Fac. Landouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniv. Gent 44 (1979) 1139–1148. 4894. Smith, I.K.: Sulfate transport in cultured tobacco cells; Plant Physiol. 55 (1975) 303–307. 4895. Smith, I.K.: Evidence for O-acetylserine in Nicotiana tabacum; Phytochemistry 16 (1977) 1293–1294. 4896. Smith, I.K.: Regulation of sulfate assimilation in tobacco cells; Plant Physiol. 66 (1980) 877–883. 4897. Snook, M.E., O.T. Chortyk, and R.F. Arrendale: Isolation and determination of imidazole derivatives in cigarette smoke; J. Chromatogr. 290 (1984) 263–274. 4898. Srivastava, B.I.S.: DNA polymerases of normal and crown gall tumor tissue cultures of tobacco; Plant Physiol. (1972) Suppl. 74. 4899. Stafford, H.A. and A.W. Galston: Ontogeny and hormonal control of polyphenoloxidase isozymes in tobacco pith; Plant Physiol. 46 (1970) 763–767. 4900. Stein, L.I. and P.P. Cohen: Correlation of growth and aspartate transcarbamylase activity in higher plants; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 108 (1965) 429–433. 4901. Stenberg, A.: Content of cesium-137 in some Uppsala placenta samples; Report, UUIP-739 (1971) 14.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4902. Stewart, P.S., P.A. Bailey, and J.L. Beven: High-performance liquid chromatographic separation of carotenoids in tobacco and their characterization with the aid of a microcomputer; J. Chromatogr. 282 (1983) 589–593. 4903. Sticher, L., U. Hinz, A.D. Meyer, and F. Meins Jr.: Intracellular transport and processing of a tobacco vacuolar B-1,3-glucanase; Planta 100 (1992) 559–565. 4904. Stoessl, A., G.L. Rock, and S.K. Gayed: Über die virtuelle Abwesenheit von Capsidiol und verwandten Stress Metaboliten in von Peronospora tabacina im Feld infiziertem Tabak [Virtual absence of capsidiol and related stress compounds from field-grown tobacco naturally infected with Peronospora tabacina]; Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 88 (1981) 367–372. 4905. Sunderland, D.W. and M.J. Merrett: Nicotinamideadenine dinucleotide, adenosine diphosphate and adenosine triphosphate content of tissues infected by tobacco mosaic virus; Nature 199 (1963) 1116–1117. 4906. Sunderland, D.W. and M.J. Merrett: Nicotinamideadenine dinucleotide and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate concentrations in leaves of Nicotiana glutinosa infected by tobacco mosaic virus; Nature 200 (1963) 921. 4907. Sung, H.Y., L.C. Lin, and J.C. Su: Syntheses of complex saccharides from UDPG in tobacco callus and pith tissues; J. Chin. Biochem. Soc. 3 (1974) 35–47. 4908. Suzuki, H., A. Noma, and N. Kashima: Two labdane diterpenoids from Nicotiana setchellii; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 1294–1295. 4908a. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, Swiss Tobacco Commission: Schweizerisches Lebensmittelbuch 38.Kapitel: Tabak und Tabakerzeugnisse [Swiss Food Manual - Chapter 38: Tobacco and tobacco products]; Federal Printing and Supplies Office, Bern, Switzerland (1965). 4909. Takagi, Y., T. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, and K. Kato: Isolation of new tobacco constituents. 9,9-Dihydro-8,9dihydroxymegastigmatrienone, from Japanese domestic Suifu tobacco; Agr. Biol. Chem. 45 (1981) 787–788. 4910. Takagi, Y., T. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, and K. Kato: Phytuberol, from Japanese domestic tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum cv; Agr. Biol. Chem. 43 (1979) 2395–2396. 4911. Takahashi, A. and M. Miyoshi: GC/MS analysis of diflubenzuron; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 43, 2007, p. 42. 4911a. Tanaka, H., J. Kataoka, O. Masuda, and A. Koiwai: Cloning of flowering-associated cDNA of tobacco; JP 04258292 A2, 14 Sep 1992, Heisei. 4912. Tanaka, K., N.E. Tolbert, and A.F. Gohlke: Choline kinase and phosphorylcholine phosphatase in plants; Plant Physiol. 41 (1966) 307–312. 4913. Tanguy, J.: Phenol metabolism and the hypersensitive reaction in Nicotiana infected with tobacco mosaic virus; Physiol. Veg. 9 (1971) 169–187. 4914. Tanguy, J.: The phenols and hypersensitivity to viruses in plants; Bull. Liaison, Groupe Polyphenols 2 (1973) 4. 4915. Tanguy, J. and C. Martin: Phenolic compounds and the hypersensitivity reaction in Nicotiana tabacum infected with tobacco mosaic virus; Phytochemistry 41 (1972) 19–28. 4916. Tazaki, H., H. Kodama, T. Fujimori, and A. Onishi: Hydroxysolanascone glucosides from flue-cured tobacco leaves; Agr. Biol. Chem. 50 (1986) 2231–2235.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1450
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
Bibliography
4917. Tappan, W.B., C.B. Van Middelem, and H.A. Move: DDT, Endosulfan, and Parathion residues on cigar-wrapper tobacco; J. Econ. Entomol. 69 (1967) 765–768. 4918. Thacker, R.P. and J. Hedegaard: Metabolism of nicotine in Psuedomonas convexa: Purification and properties involved; Soc. Gen. Microbiol. Mtg. (1972). 4919. Thorpe, T.A. and E.J. Laishley: Carbohydrate oxidation during Nicotiana tabacum callus growth; Phytochemistry 13 (1974) 1323–1328. 4920. Thorpe, T.A. and D.D. Meir: Enzymes of starch metabolism in Nicotiana tabacum callus; Phytochemistry 13 (1974) 1329–1334. 4921. Tian, H.-Y., S.-H. Li, F.-W. Xie, M. Wu, and J.-P. Xie: Measurement of pyridines in environmental tobacco smoke by XAD-4 adsorption/desorption coupled to GC/MS: 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 31, 2007, p. 34. 4922. Tolnay, P. and G. Lumnitzer: Investigation on tobacco proteases; Rev. Int. Tabacs 31 (1956) 210. 4923. Tupy, J.: Changes in glucose and fructose level in Nicotiana alata styles and ovaries accompanying compatible and incompatible pollen tube growth; Biol. Plantarum 3 (1961) 1–14. 4924. Turner, F.R.: Ultrastructural observation on the histochemical localization of acid phosphatase and inosine diphosphatase in Nicotiana callus tissues; Am. J. Botany 57 (1970) 737. 4925. Turner, J.E. and S.K. Shapiro: S-Methylmethionine and S-adenosylmethionine-homocysteine transmethylase in higher plant seeds; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 51 (1961) 581–584. 4926. Tyree, D.: The fermentation of Maryland tobacco grown under different rates of nitrogen fertilizer; Dissertation Abstr. 5 (1962) 1508–1509. 4927. Uegaki, R., T. Fujimori, H. Kaneko, and K. Kato: Isolation of geranylgeraniadiene from Nicotiana tabacum cv. Burley; Agr. Biol. Chem. 44 (1980) 2215. 4928. Uegaki, R., T. Fujimori, S. Kubo, and T. Kato: Sesquiterpenoid stress compounds from Nicotiana rustica inoculated with TMV; Phytochemistry 22 (1983) 1193–1195. 4929. Uegaki, R., T. Fujimori, S. Kubo, and K. Kato: Stress compounds from Nicotiana rustica inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus; Phytochemistry 24 (1985) 2445–2447. 4930. Ulbrich, B. and M.H. Zenk: Partial purification and properties of hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: Quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase from higher plants; Phytochemistry 18 (1979) 929–933. 4931. Ulbrich, B. and M.H. Zenk: Partial purification and properties of p-hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: Shikimatep-hydroxycinnamoyl transferase from higher plants; Phytochemistry 19 (1980) 1625–1629. 4932. Umirbaevam K., K.K. Dhairollina, T.L. Tazhieava, and L.K. Klyshev: Isolation of nicotine dehydrogenase from Psuedomonas putida and some of its properties; Izvest. Akad. Nauk. Kaz. SSR Ser. Biol. Nauk (1984) 10–14. 4933. Unbehaun, L.M. and L.D. Moore: Pectic substance in healthy and black root diseased tobacco roots; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 161–163. 4934. Unbehaun, L.M. and L.D. Moore: Pectic enzymes associated with black root rot of tobacco; Phytopathology 60 (1970) 304–308.
1451
4935. Vagera, J.: Effects of mutagens on androgenesis in some species of genus Nicotiana L; Biol. Plant 20 (1978) 19–24. 4935a. Van Auken, T.V., H.J. Grubbs, and W.R. Johnson Jr: Smoking tobacco compositions; U.S. Patent No. 4,092,988 (1978). 4936. Van Duuren, B.L. and F.A. Schmitt: Epoxidation and cyclization of squalene; J. Org. Chem. 25 (1960) 1761–1765. 4937. Van Noort, G., W. Hudson, and S.G. Wildman: Enzymatic and antigenic properties of Fraction I protein from spinach and tobacco leaves; Plant Physiol. (1980) Suppl. 63. 4938. Van Noort, G. and S.G. Wildman: Proteins of green leaves. IX. Enzymatic properties of Fraction I protein isolated by a specific antibody; Biochim. Biophys. Acta 90 (1964) 209–212. 4939. Vansuyt, G., J.C. Vallee, and J. Prevost: Pyrroline-5carboxylate reductase and proline dehydrogenase in Nicotiana tabacum var. Xanthi NC as a function of its development; Physiol. Veg. 17 (1979) 95–105. 4940. Vark, E., O. Keerberg, H. Keerberg, and T. Parnik: Effect of light intensity on the metabolism of serine in bean [Phaseolus vulgaris] and tobacco [Nicotiana sylvestris] leaves; Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. Toim. 20 (1971) 179–182. 4941. Varkas, G.L. and L. Lovrekovich: Enzyme levels in tobacco leaf tissues affected by the wildfire toxin; Phytopathology 55 (1965) 519–524. 4942. VOID 4943. Vlitos, A.J. and W. Meudt: The role of auxin in plant flowering. III. Free indole acids in short-day plants grown under photoinductive and non-photoinductive daylengths; Contrib. Bouce Thompson Inst. 17 (1954) 413–417. 4944. Vogeli, U., R. Vogeli-Lange, and J. Chappell: Inhibition of phytoalexin biosynthesis in elicitor-treated tobacco cell-suspension cultures by calcium/calmodulin antagonists; Plant Physiol. 100 (1992) 1369–1376. 4945. Wada, K.: Microbial degradation of the tobacco alkaloids and some related compounds; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 72 (1957) 145–162. 4946. Wahl, R.: Detection and separation of (triose) Reductone, mesoxaldialdehyde and hydroxypyruvic acid during sugar determination in flue-cured tobaccos; TabakForschung (1957) (19) 42–45. 4947. Wahlberg, I. R. Arndt; T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 63. Syntheses and stereostructures of six tobacco seco-cembranoids; Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 40 (1986) 123–134. 4948. Wahlberg, I. D. Behr, A.-M. Eklund, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 52. Seven new norcembranoids isolated from Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. Series B34 (1980) 675–683. 4949. Wahlberg, I., A.-M. Eklund, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 53. Two new nor-drimanes from Greek tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B35 (1981) 307–310. 4950. Wahlberg, I., V.G. Wallin, T. Nishida, and C.R. Enzell: Tobacco chemistry. 57. Two new labdanic compounds from tobacco; Acta Chem. Scand. 36B (1982) 573–576. 4950a. Wal, S.S.V.: Analysis of organic acids in cigar tobacco; Column 3 (1970) 5–6.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1451
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
1452
4951. Waldbott, G.L. and W. Ölschlager: Fluoride in the environment; Fluoride 7 (1974) 220–222. 4952. Wang, Y. K.M. Herrmann, S.C. Weller, and P.B. Goldsbrough: Cloning and nucleotide sequence of a complementary DNA encoding 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate synthase from tobacco; Plant Physiol. 97 (1991) 847–848. 4953. Wang, Y.X., J.D. Jones, S.C. Weller, and P.B. Goldsbrough: Expression and stability of amplified genes encoding 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase in glyphosate-tolerant tobacco cells; Plant Mol. Biol. 17 (1991) 1127–1138. 4954. Washitani, I. and S. Sato: Studies on the function of proplastids in the metabolism of in vitro cultured tobacco cells. V. Primary transamination; Plant Cell Physiol. 19 (1978) 43–50. 4955. Watanabe, R.: A study of simple phenolic compounds in tobacco flowers and leaves; Dissertation Abstr. (1962) 1509. 4956. Welkie, G.W. and G.W. Miller: Iron nutrition of Nicotiana tabacum L. in relation to riboflavin, riboflavin-5-phosphate, and flavin adenine dinucleotide content; Plant Physiol. 35 (1960) 516–520. 4957. Wen, T.C.: Studies on the relationship of mineral nutrition and quality of leaf tobacco. I. Effects of potassium, calcium, and magnesium on the adsorption and metabolism of phosphorus; Yen Chin Hui Pao - T’ai-wan Sheng Yen Chiu Kung Mai Chu Yen Yeh Shin Yen So 3 (1975) 29–46. 4958. Wendelboe, F.N.: Essential oil study-Stemmery drying methods; RDM, 1979, No. 21, April 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504356019 -6024. 4959. Wender, S., W. Chorney, R. Bradford, E. Murphy, C.H. Yang, and N. Scully: Preliminary studies on polyphenols of tobacco; Amer. Chem. Soc. Mtg. (1956). 4960. Whatley, F.R., M.B. Allen, and A.V. Trebst: Photosynthesis by isolated chloroplasts. IX. Photosynthesis and CO2 assimilation in different species; Plant Physiol. 35 (1960) 388–393. 4961. Wheeler, J.P.: Evaluation of Basic 85 and Basic 100 cigarettes; RDM, 1978, No. 33, November 21, see www. rjrtdocs.com 515219460 -9470. 4962. Widholm, J.M.: Tryptophan biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum and Daucus carota cell cultures: Site action of inhibitory tryptophan analogs; Biochim. Biophys. Acta 261 (1972) 44–51. 4963. Wilkinson, B.J., M.C. Fu, and D.C. White: Assay of a volatile inhibitor in tobacco smoke using bacterial cytochrome oxidase; Proc. Univ. KY Tobacco Health Workshop Conf. (1972) 276–294. 4964. Wilkinson, R.E. and M.J. Kasperbauer: Effect of light and temperature on epicuticular fatty acid and fatty alcohol of tobacco; Phytochemistry 19 (1980) 1379–1393. 4965. Williams, V.S. and A.S. Watts: Storage stability of smoke extracts and reference solutions for phenol analysis by liquid chromatography; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 9, 2007, pp. 20–21. 4966. Williard, C. and K. Mills: Development and validation of an improved GC/MS method for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mainstream tobacco smoke; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 49, 2007, p. 46.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
4967. Wilson, R.A., B.D. Mookherjee, and J.F. Vinals: A comparative analysis of the volatile constituents of Virginia, burley, Turkish and black tobaccos; 184th Natl. ACS Mtg., Kansas City KS, Agr. Food Chem. Paper 38 (1982). 4968. Witas, T. and P. Sledziewski: Malonal generation conditions of the tobacco smoke; Die Nahrung 24 (1980) 243. 4969. Wong, K.F. and E.A. Cossins: Occurrence and some properties of N-5, N-10-methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenases in plants; Can. J. Biochem. 44 (1966) 1400–1403. 4970. Wood, H.N., M.C. Lin, and A.C. Braun: The inhibition of plant and animal adenosine 3’:5’-cyclic monophosphate phosphodiesterases by a cell-division-promoting substance from tissues of higher plant species; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69 (1972) 403–406. 4971. Woodward, J.R. D. Craik, A. Dell, K.H. Khoo, S.L.A Munro, A.E. Clarke, and A. Bacic: Structural analysis of the N-linked glycan chains from a stylar glycoprotein associated with expression of self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata; Glycobiology 2 (1992) 241–250. 4972. Wray, J.L., R.E. Brick, and L. Fowden: Development of aminoacyl tRNA synthetases in cultured Nicotiana tabacum cells; Phytochemistry 13 (1974) 697–701. 4973. Wyen, N.V., J. Udvardy, S. Erdei, and C.L. Farkas: Level of a relatively purine-specific ribonuclease increases in virus-infected hypersensitive of mechanically injured tobacco leaves; Virology 48 (1972) 337–341. 4974. Xu, D., Y. Shen, and M. Nielsen: Development of low nornicotine tobacco lines through genetic engineering and mutagenesis; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 33, 2007, p. 35–36. 4975. Yaeko, N., K. Ueki, and S. Sato: Chromatographic separation of extracellular acid phosphatase of tobacco cells cultured under Pi-supplied and omitted conditions; Plant Cell Physiol. 18 (1977) 413–420. 4976. Yamada, Y., Y. Hara, M. Senda, M. Nishihara, and M. Kito: Phospholipids of membranes of cultured cells and the products of protoplast fusion; Phytochemistry 18 (1979) 423–426. 4977. Yamamoto, Y.: NAD kinase in higher plants; Plant Physiol. 42 (1967) 523–538. 4978. Yamamoto, Y.: Malate synthetase in higher plants; Plant Physiol. 35 (1960) 102–108. 4979. Yamazaki, A. and K. Maeda: Thermal decomposition of cigarette paper. III. Volatile compounds in pyrolysis products of flax pulp, wood pulp and handmade cigarette paper composed of both pulps; Kami Pa Gikyoshi 39 (1985) 1164–1175. 4980. Yin, D.-H., G.-Y. Xie, J.-F. Liu, and Y. Jin: Novel catalysts for selective reduction of CO and NOx in cigarette smoke; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 52, 2007, p. 47. 4981. Yoshida, D.: Mechanisms of alkaloid accumulation in varieties of tobacco plants with low alkaloid content; Nippon Senbai Kosha Hatano Tabako Shikenjo Hokoku (1973) 245–257. 4982. Yoshida, D. and T. Mitake: Agmatine and N-carbamylputrescine as intermediates in the formation of nicotine by tobacco plants; Plant Cell Physiol. (Tokyo) (1966) 301–305.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1452
11/24/08 2:40:07 PM
Bibliography
4983. Yu, L.M. and R.E. Hampton: Biochemical changes in tobacco infected with Colletotrichum destructivum. I. Fluorescent compounds, phenols, and some associated enzymes; Phytochemistry 3 (1964) 269–272. 4984. Yunoshev, V.K.: Color formation in tobacco leaf and polyphenols; Trudy Krasnodarsk. Instuta Pishchevoi Prom. (1958) 7–12. 4985. Yunoshev, V.K.: Quantitative changes of chlorogenic and caffeic acids in tobacco during fermentation of tobacco; Izvest. Vysshikh Ucheb. Zaved. 4 (1961) 44–50. 4986. Zawadzki, M. and D. Ergle: Novel determination of phenolic and other labile hydrogen functional groups in the whole tar phase; 61st Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 61, Paper No. 51, 2007, p. 46. 4987. Zelitch, I.: The relation of glycolic acid synthesis to the primary photosynthesis producing reaction in leaves; J. Biol. Chem. 240 (1965) 1869–1876. 4988. Zhiku, P., M. Tkach, and E. Sherban: Gaschromatographic determination of Pirimor in tobacco; Izvest. Akad. Nauk. Mold. SSR Ser. Biol. Khim. Nauk 2 (1986) 73–74. 4989. Zioni, A.B., Y. Vaadia, and S.H. Lips: Nitrate uptake by roots as regulated by nitrate reduction products of the shoot; Physiol. Plant 24 (1971) 288–290.
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES IN CHAPTERS 1D01. Wu, R., S. Bai, N. Ge, Y. Jiang, and S. Qiao: Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; Sepu 7 (1989) 52–54. 1E01. Bai, S., R. Wu, N. Ge, Y. Jiang, and S. Qiao: Determination of organic pollutants in cigarette smoke; Fenxi Huaxue 18 (1990) 832–835. 1E02. Trinh, V.D. and H.C. Khanh: Sidestream tobacco smoke constituents in indoor air in an experimental chamber: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Environ. Int. 15 (1989) 57–65. 2A01. Erickson, R.E., C.H. Shunk, N.R. Trenner, B.H. Arison, and K. Folkers: Coenzyme Q. XI. The structure of solanesol; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81 (1959) 4999–5000. 2A02. Haagen-Smit, A.J., T.H. Wang, and N.T. Mirov: Composition of gum turpentine. XIII. A report on Pinus albicaulis; J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., Sci. Ed. 40 (1951) 557. 2A03. Shunk, C.H., R.E. Erickson, E.L. Wong, and K. Folkers: Synthesis of coenzyme Q9, 2,3-dimethyl-5-solanesylbenzoquinone (Q-254) and a vitamin analog; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81 (1959) 5000. 3A01. Battelle Institute: A chronic inhalation toxicity study in rats and mice exposed to formaldehyde; Battelle Institute, Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, OH (1981). 3A02. Butlerov, A.M.: [Identification of formaldehyde (1859)]; See International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Some industrial chemicals and dyestuffs; IARC Monograph 29 (1982) 345–389, see p. 347. 3A03. Cogliano, V.J., Y. Grosse, R.A. Baan, K. Straif, M.B. Secretan, F. El Ghissassi, and the Working Group for Volume 88: Summary of IARC monographs on formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol; Environ. Hlth. Perspect. 113 (2005) 1205–1208.
1453
3A04. Chemical Industrial Institute of Toxicology (CIIT): Statement concerning research findings; Docket No. 77709, Research Triangle Park, NC (8 October, 1979). 3A05. Clary, J.J., J.E. Gibson, and R.S. Waritz: Formaldehyde. Toxicology, epidemiology, mechanisms; Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, NY (1983) 256. 3A06. Dalbey, W.E.: Formaldehyde and tumors in hamster respiratory tract; Toxicology 24 (1982) 9–14. 3A07. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Formaldehyde; Fed. Register (23 May, 1984). 3A08. Feron, V.J. and A. Kruysse: Effect of exposure to acrolein vapor in hamsters simultaneously treated with benzo[a]pyrene or diethylnitrosamine; J. Tox. Environ. Hlth. 3 (1977) 379–394. 3A09. George, T.W.: Personal 1963 communication to E.L. Wynder, cited in Wynder, E.L. and D. Hoffmann: Tobacco and tobacco smoke: Studies in experimental tobacco carcinogenesis; Academic Press, New York, NY (1967) see p. 253. 3A10. Guerin, M.R., R.A. Jenkins, and B.A. Tomkins: Field Studies: Formaldehyde; Chapter 10 in: Guerin, M.R., R.A. Jenkins, and B.A. Tomkins: The chemistry of environmental tobacco smoke: Composition and measurement; Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL (1992) see pp. 197–209. 3A11. Horton, A.W., R. Tye, and K.L. Stemmer: Experimental carcinogenesis of the lung. Inhalation of gaseous formaldehyde or an aerosol of coal tar in C3H mice; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 30 (1963) 31–43. 3A12. Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc.: Interim Report No. 1 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Study of the ciliary-depressant activity of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1964, No. 56, December 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521184009 -4030; .Interim Report No. 2 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Study of the ciliary-depressant activity of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1964, No. 57, December 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521184031 -4047; Interim Report No. 3 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Study of the ciliary-depressant Activity of Cigarette Smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 8, February 4, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009025 -9031; Interim Report No. 4 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Study of the ciliary-depressant Activity of Cigarette Smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 15, March 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009080 -9119; Interim Report No. 5 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Study of the ciliary-depressant activity of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 16, March 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009120 -9136; Interim Report No. 8 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Study of the ciliary-depressant activity of cigarette smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 29, June 14, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521184165 -4189; Interim Report No. 9 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—The smoking machine: The in vivo studies of ciliastatic effects of tobacco smoke; RDR, 1965, No. 61, December 15, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500966552 -6563; Interim Report No. 10 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Studies on the ciliastatic effects of Camel cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo; RDR, 1966, No. 1, January 5, see www.rjrtdocs. com 501009213 -9238; Interim Report No. 11 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Studies on the ciliastatic effects of Winston cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo; RDR, 1966, No. 4, February 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009265 -9290; Interim Report No. 12 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Studies on the ciliastatic effects
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1453
11/24/08 2:40:08 PM
1454
3A13.
3A14.
3A15.
3A16.
3A17.
3A18.
3A19.
3A20.
3A21.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
of Tempo cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo; RDR, 1966, No. 16, April 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009291 -9313; Interim Report No. 13 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Studies on the ciliastatic effects of Salem cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo; RDR, 1966, No. 23, June 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009314 -9341; Interim Report No. 14 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—The in vivo studies of ciliastatic effects of cigarette smoke on cat trachea; RDR, 1966, No. 29, July 26, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501009418 -9426; Interim Report No. 15 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Saliva-soluble components of tobacco smoke; RDR, 1966, No. 30, July 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500967353 -7353; Interim Report No. 16 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—The effects of saliva-soluble ciliastatic components of tobacco smoke on the cat trachea in vivo; RDR, 1966, No. 34, September 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521184202 -4221; Interim Report No. 17 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company— Studies on ciliastatic effects of Lucky Strike cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo - IBT No. E4662; RDR, 1966, No. 36, October 21, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501009498 -9524; Interim Report No. 18 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Studies on ciliastatic effects of Chesterfield Nonfilter cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo - IBT No. E4662; RDR, 1966, No. 39, November 14, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501009525 -9552; Interim Report No. 19 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Studies on ciliastatic effects of Tempo cigarette smoke on cat trachea in vivo IBT No. E4662; RDR, 1967, No. 10, March 30, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501009567 -9594. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 29 (1982) 345–389; Suppl. 4: 131–132. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 6 (1987) 321–324. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 7 (1987) 211–216. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxy-2-propanol; Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; Lyon, France, IARC Monograph 88 (2006). Murphy, S.D., D.A. Klingshim, and C.E. Ulrich: Respiratory response of guinea pigs during acrolein inhalation and its modification by drugs; J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 141 (1963) 70–83. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): Proposal to lower formaldehyde exposure from 5 ppm to 1 ppm; Chem. Reg. Reporter 9 (1985) 712 (27 September). Smirnov, I., M.P. Piatnisky, A.P. Smirnov, and A.A. Sirotenko: Biochemie des Tabaks [Biochemistry of tobacco]; W. Junk Publisher, The Hague (1940). Sterling, T.D. and A. Arundel: Possible carcinogenic components of indoor air: Combustion by-products, formaldehyde, mineral fibers, radiation, and tobacco smoke; J. Environ. Sci. Hlth. C2 (2) (1984) 185–230. Swenberg, J.A., W.D. Kerns, R.I. Mitchell, E.J. Gialla, and K.L. Pavkov: Induction of squamous cell carcinoma of the rat nasal cavity by inhalation exposure to formaldehyde vapor; Cancer Res. 40 (1980) 3398–3402.
3A22. Theiss, J.C., M.E. Brower, and C.E. Dallas: Adenomas in mice inhaling air plus 15 ppm formaldehyde for 18 weeks; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 25 (1984) 220. 3A23. United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS): Report on the consensus workshop on formaldehyde; USDHHS 58 (1984) 339, 357–358. 3A24. von Hofmann, A.W.: [Discovery of formaldehyde (1867)], see www.3dchem.com/molecules 3A25. Weber, A., C. Jermini, and E. Grandjean: Irritating effects on man of air pollution due to cigarette smoke; Am. J. Pub. Hlth. 66 (1976) 672–676. 4A01. Boyland, E., E.R. Busby, C.E. Dukes, P.L. Grover, and D. Manson: Further experiments on implantation of materials into the urinary bladder of mice; Brit. J. Cancer 13 (1964) 575–581. 4A02. Rodgman, A.: The chemical composition of environmental tobacco smoke: Some comments on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s notice on ‘Indoor Air Quality’; Document submitted to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 5 August, 1994, pp. i-xiii + 1–172, see www.rjrtdocs.com 515923456 -3645, 515926646 -6833, 517582702 -2904, 521186677 -6881, 521187802 -7991, see p. 105, Table 23 for previously unpublished data by Rodgman et al. (3306). 4A03. Roffo, A.H.: La acción de cancerigeno de un derivado phenanthrene del colesterol [Cancer-producing action of a phenanthrene derivative from cholesterol]; Bol. Inst Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 15 (1939)837–845, see Chem. Abstr. 33 (1939) 82777. 4A04. Roffo, A.H.: Die karzinogene Wirkung eines Phenanthrenderivates aus Cholesterin [The carcinogenic action of a phenanthrene derivative from cholesterol]; Z. Krebsforsch. 49 (1939) 341–347, see Chem. Abstr. 34 (1940) 17308. 4A05. Roffo, A.H.: Experimental gastric cancer from ingestion of heat-oxidized fats; Bol. Inst. Med. Exptl. Estud. Cáncer 19 (1942) 503–530, see Chem. Abstr. 37 (1943) 63358. 4B01. Van Order, R.B. and H.G. Linwall: Indole; Chem. Rev. 30 (1942) 69–96. 6A01. Abbott, P.J.: Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants; 49th Mtg., Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, World Health Organization, Geneva (1998). 6A02. Bär, V.F. and F. Griepentrog: Where we stand concerning the evaluation of flavoring substances from the viewpoint of health; Med. Ernahr. 8 (1967) 244–251. 6A03. Bellis, D.M.: Metabolism of coumarin and related compounds in cultures of Penicillium species; Nature 182 (1958) 806–807. 6A04. Booth, A.N., M.S. Masri, D.J. Robbins, O.H. Emerson, F.T. Jones, and F. DeEds: Urinary metabolites of coumarin and o-coumaric acid; J. Biol. Chem. 234 (1959) 946–948. 6A05. Buchner, B.: Coumarin toxicology literature survey; Government Relations Group Memorandum August 14, 1978, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503844869 -4893. 6A06. Dickens, F. and H.E.H. Jones: Further studies on the carcinogenic action of certain lactones and related substances in the rat and mouse; Brit. J. Cancer 19 (1965) 392–403. 6A07. Griepentrog, F.: Pathological-anatomical results on the effect of coumarin in animal experiments; Toxicology 1 (1973) 93–102. 6A08. Hagan, E. C., W.H. Hansen, O.G. Fitzhugh, P.M. Jenner, W.I. Jones, J.M. Taylor, E.L. Long, A.M. Nelson, and
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1454
11/24/08 2:40:08 PM
1455
Bibliography
6A09.
6A10.
6A11.
6A12.
6A13.
6A14.
6A15.
6A16.
6A17.
6A18.
6A19.
6A20.
6A21.
6A22.
7A01.
7A02.
J.B. Brouwer: Food flavorings and compounds of related structure. II. Subacute and chronic toxicity; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 5 (1967) 141–157. L. W. Hazleton, T. W. Tusing, B. R. Zeitlin, R. Thiessen Jr, and H. K. Murer: Toxicity of coumarin; J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 3 (1956) 348–358. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Some naturally occurring substances; IARC Monograph 10 (1976) 113–119. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Some industrial chemicals; 77 (2000) 193. Lawley, P.D.: Carcinogenesis by alkylating agents; Chapter 7 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 325–484. Lee, C.K.: Mutagenicity testing on coumarin; Memorandum to A. Rodgman, November 1, 1978, see www.rjrtdocs.com 504315286 -5287. Matula, T.: Analytical report; Mutagenicity studies; Report to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. from Bio-Research Laboratories Ltd., February 8, 1977, see www.rjrtdocs. com 511309136 -9139. Mead, J.A.R., J.N. Smith, and R.T. Williams: Studies in detoxication. 72. The metabolism of coumarin and o-coumaric acid; Biochem. J. 68 (1958) 67–74. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Suspected carcinogens: A subfile of RTECS, NIOSH Rpt. 2nd Edition 77–149 (1976) 74. Pekker, I. and E.A. Schäfer: Vergleich von enterales und perkutaner Resorption von Cumarin [Comparison of enteral and percutaneous resorption of coumarin]; Arzneimittelforschung 19 (1969)1744–1745. Rodgman, A.: Recommendation re coumarin use; Memorandum to A.H. Laurene, July 7, 1978, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501523143 -3146; Recommendation re coumarin use; Memorandum to A.H. Laurene, October 20, 1978, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500929411 -9413, 501523139 -3141; Coumarin: Ames’ test results; Memorandum to A.H. Laurene, November, 1978, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501523030 -3030. Rodgman, A.: Coumarin: Memorandum to G.R. DiMarco, December 6, 1982, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503260348 -0361. Roe, F.J.C. and M.H. Salaman: Further studies on incomplete carcinogenesis: Triethylene melamine (T.E.M.), 1,2-benzanthracene and 3-propiolactone, as initiators of skin tumour formation in the mouse; Brit. J. Cancer 9 (1955) 177–203. Stahmann, M.A., C.F. Huebner, and K.P. Link: Studies on the hemorrhagic sweet clover disease. V. Identification and synthesis of the hemorrhagic agent; J. Biol. Chem. 138 (1941) 513–527. Withers, R.F.J.: The action of some lactones and related compounds on human chromosomes; Mech. Mutat. Inducing Factors, Symp. Proc. (1966) pp. 359–364. Dickens, F. and H.E.H. Jones: Further studies on the carcinogenic and growth-inhibiting activity of lactones and related substances; Brit. J. Cancer 17 (1963) 100–108. Dickens, F. and H.E.H. Jones: Further studies on the carcinogenic action of certain lactones and related
7A03.
7A04.
8A01.
8A02.
8A03.
8A04.
8A05.
8A06.
8A07.
8A08. 8A09.
11A01.
12A01.
12A02.
substances in the rat and mouse; Brit. J. Cancer 19 (1965) 392–403. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some fumigants, the herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, chlorinated dibenzodioxins and miscellaneous industrial chemicals; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man; IARC Monograph 15 (1977) 265–271. Lawley, P.D.: Carcinogenesis by alkylating agents; Chapter 7 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 325–484. Baker, R.R.: The generation of formaldehyde in cigarettes. Overview and recent experiments; Food Chem. Toxicol. 44 (2006) 1799–1822. Baker, R.R.: Sugars, carbonyls, and smoke; Letter to the Editor, Food Chem. Toxicol., listed as unpublished as of February 27, 2007 on Google Search for Baker, R.R.: Sugars, carbonyls, and smoke. Baker, R.R., S. Coburn, C. Liu, and J. Tetteh: Pyrolysis of saccharide tobacco ingredients: A TGA-FTIR investigation; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 74 (2005) 171–180. Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc.: Interim Report No. 15 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company—Saliva-soluble components of tobacco smoke; RDR, 1966, No. 30, July 26, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500967353 -7353; Interim Report No. 16 to R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company— The effects of saliva-soluble ciliastatic components of tobacco smoke on the cat trachea in vivo; RDR, 1966, No. 34, September 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 521184202 -4221. Sato, S., T. Ohka, M. Nagao, K, Tsuji, and T, Kosuge: Reduction in mutagenicity of cigarette smke condensate by added sugars; Mutation Res. 60 (1979) 155–161. Seeman, J.I., S.W. Laffoon, and A.J. Kassman: Evaluation of relationships between mainstream smoke acetaldehyde and “tar” and carbon monoxide yields in tobacco smoke and reducing sugars in tobacco blends of U.S. commercial cigarettes; Inhal. Toxicol. 15 (2003) 373–395. Shelar, G.R., P.F. Bernasek, and O.P. Furin: Sugar/nicotine study; ATP 1992, No. 92–210, July 29, see www. rjrtdocs.com 510697389 -7410. Snook, M.E., P.F. Mason, and V.A. Sisson: Polyphenols in the Nicotiana species; Tob. Sci. 30 (1986) 43–49. Wassef, M.K. and J.W. Hendrix: Glycolipids and phospholipids of cured burley and flue-cured tobacco; J. Agr. Food Chem. 23 (1975) 688–690. Department of Health (Canada): Proposed tobacco reporting regulations. Schedule 2. Official methods for the collection of emission data on mainstream smoke; Canada Gazette. Part II. 133 (15) pp. 1781–1784 (July 19, 2000). Department of Health (Canada): Proposed tobacco reporting regulations. Schedule 2. Official methods for the collection of emission data on mainstream smoke; Canada Gazette. Part II. 133 (15) pp. 1781–1784 (July 19, 2000). Parkes, H.G. and A.E.J. Evans: Epidemiology of aromatic amine cancers; Chapter 5 in: Chemical carcinogens. Second edition, edited by C.E. Searle, American Chemical Society Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1984) 277–301.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1455
11/24/08 2:40:08 PM
1456
12A03. Takeda, K., K. Shudo, T. Okamoto, M. Nagao, K. Wakayabashi, and T. Sugimura: Effect of methyl substitution on mutagenicity of dipyrido[1,2-a:3’,2’-d] imidazol-2-amine – Glu-P-2; Carcinogenesis 1 (1980) 889–892. 15A01. Boyland, E., J.W. Gorrod, B.C.V. Mitchley and F.J.C. Roe: Nitrosamines; Brit. Emp. Cancer Camp., Ann. Rpt. 40 (1963) 34, see Council for Tobacco Research Document HK1879001/9038; http://legacy.library.ucsf. edu/. 15A02. Brune, H. and S. Henning: Erzeugung von Augenlidcarcinomen bei Mäusen nach epicutaner Applikation von Methyl-butyl-nitrosamin [Production of eyelid carcinoma in mice after cutaneous application of methylbutylnitrosamine]; Z. Krebsforsch. 69 (1967) 307–308. 15A03. Brunnemann, K.D. and D. Hoffmann: Analytical studies on tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in tobacco and tobacco smoke; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 21 (1991) 235–240. 15A04. Brunnemann, K.D., A.P. Hornby, and H.F. Stich: Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the saliva of Inuit snuff dippers in the Northwest Territories of Canada; Cancer Lett. 37 (1987) 7–16. 15A05. Carmella, S.G., S. Akerkar, and S.S. Hecht: Metabolites of the tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in smokers’ urine; Cancer Res. 53 (1993) 721–724. 15A06. Carmella, S.G., S.S. Kagan, M. Kagan, P.G. Foiles, G. Palladino, A.M. Quart, E. Quart, and S.S. Hecht: Mass spectrometric analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamine hemoglobin adducts in snuff-dippers, smokers, and nonsmokers; Cancer Res. 50 (1990) 5438–5445. 15A07. Castonguay, A.: Pulmonary carcinogenesis and its prevention by dietary polyphenolic compounds; in: Tobacco smoking and nutrition, edited by J.N. Diana and W.A. Pryor, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 868 (1993) 177–185. 15A08. Castonguay, A., D. Lin, G.D. Stoner, K. Furuya, S.S. Hecht, H.A.J. Schut, and J.E. Klaunig: Comparative carcinogenicity in A/J mice and metabolism by cultured mouse peripheral lung of N-nitrosonornicotine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone and their analogues; Cancer Res. 43 (1983) 1223–1229. 15A09. Dontenwill, W. and U. Mohr: The organotropic effect of nitrosamines; Z. Krebsforsch. 65 (1962) 166–167. 15A10. Eisenbrand, G., M. Archer, K.D. Brunnemann, D.H. Fine, S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, J. Krull, and K.S. Webb: Problems of contamination and artefact formation in nitrosamine sampling and analysis; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, T. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 25–34. 15A11. Eisenstark, A., R. Eistenstark, and R. Van Sickle: Mutation of Salmonella typhimurium by nitrosoguanidine; Mutation Res. 2 (1965) 1–10. 15A12. Fan, T.Y., V. Goff, L. Song, D.H. Fine, G.P. Arsenault, and K. Biemann: N-Nitrosodiethanolamine in cosmetics, lotions and shampoos; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 15 (1977) 423–430. 15A13. Freund, H.A.: Clinical manifestations and studies in parenchymatous hepatitis; Ann. Int. Med. 10 (1937) 1144–1155.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
15A14. Hansen, T., W. Iwaoka, L. Green, and S.R. Tannenbaum: Analysis of N-nitrosoproline in raw bacon. Further evidence that nitrosoproline is not a major precursor of N-nitrosopyrrolidine; J. Agr. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 1423–1426. 15A15. Hecht, S.S.: N-Nitrosamines in cosmetics; Drug Cosmetic. 128 (1981) 36–37. 15A16. Hecht, S.S., J.D. Adams, S. Numoto, and D. Hoffmann: Induction of respiratory tract tumors in Syrian golden hamsters by a single dose of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and the effect of smoke inhalation; Carcinogenesis 4 (1983) 1287–1290. 15A17. Hecht, S.S., A. Castonguay, F.L. Chung, and D. Hoffmann: Carcinogenicity and metabolic activation of tobacco-specific nitrosamines: current status and future prospects; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relationship to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and F. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 763–768. 15A18. Hecht, S.S., C. Chen, T. Ohmori, and D. Hoffmann: Comparative carcinogenicity in F344 rats of the N’-nitrosonornicotine and 4-(N-methyl-N-nitrosamino)1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone; Cancer Res. 40 (1980) 298–302. 15A19. Hecht, S.S. and D. Hoffmann: The relevance of tobaccospecific nitrosamines to human cancer; Cancer Surv. 8 (1989) 273–294. 15A20. Hecht, S.S. and D. Hoffmann: N-Nitroso compounds and tobacco-induced cancers in man; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch: IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 54–61. 15A21. Hecht, S.S. and D. Lin: Comparative mutagenicity of 4-(carboethoxynitrosamino)-4-(3-pyridyl) butanal and 4-(carboethoxynitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)1-butanone: Model compounds for A-hydroxylation of N’-nitrosonornicotine; Carcinogenesis 7 (1986) 611–614. 15A22. Hecht, S.S., D. Lin, and A. Castonguay: Effects of A-deuterium substitution on the mutagenicity of 4-(Nmethylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK); Carcinogenesis 4 (1983) 305–310. 15A23. Hecht, S.S., A. Rivenson, J. Braley, J. DiBello, J.D. Adams, and D. Hoffmann: Induction of oral cavity tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific nitrosamines and snuff; Cancer Res. 46 (1986) 4162–4166. 15A24. Herrold, K.M.: Effect of route of administration on the carcinogenic action of diethylnitrosamine (N-nitrosodiethylamine); Brit. J. Cancer 78 (1964) 189–195. 15A25. Herrold, K.M. and L.J. Dunham: Effects of subcutaneous injection of dimethylnitrosamine in the Syrian hamster; Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 4 (1963) 28. 15A26. Hoffmann, D., K.D. Brunnemann, J.D. Adams, A. Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: N-Nitrosamines in human carcinogenesis; in: Nitrosamines and human cancer, edited by P.N. Magee, Banbury Report 12, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982) 211–226. 15A27. Hoffmann, D., A Rivenson, and S.S. Hecht: The role of nicotine in tobacco carcinogenesis; Tribute R. Truhaut, Fac. Pharm., Univ. Paris, Paris, France (1984) 491–495.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1456
11/24/08 2:40:08 PM
Bibliography
15A28. Hoffmann, D., A. Rivenson, S.S. Hecht, J. Hilfrich, N. Kobayashi, and E.L. Wynder: Model studies in tobacco carcinogenesis with the Syrian golden hamster; Prog. Exp. Tumor Res. 24 (1979) 370–390. 15A29. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: Chamber development and aerosol dispersion; in: Inhalation carcinogenesis, edited by M.J. Hanna, P. Nettesheim, and J.R. Gilbert, US Atomic Energy Commission Symposium Series 18 (1970) 178. 15A30. Hoffmann, F. and A. Graffi: Carcinome der Nasenhöhle bei Mäusen nach Tropfung der Rückenhaut mit Diäthylnitrosamin [Nostril carcinoma in mice after dripping the ridge skin with diethylnitrosamine]; Acta Biol. Med. German. 12 (1964) 623–625; Nasenhöhlentumoren bei Mäusen nach percutaner Diäthylnitrosaminapplikation [Nostril tumors in mice after dermal application of diethylnitrosamine]; Arch. Geschwulstforsch. 23 (1964) 274–288. 15A31. Klein, R.G., I. Janowsky, B.L. Pool-Zobel, P. Schmezer, R. Hermann, F. Amelung, B. Spiegelhalder, and W.J. Zeller: Effects of long-term inhalation of N-nitrosodimethylamine in rats; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco smoke, and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 322–328. 15A32. Klus, H., H. Begutter, M. Ball, and M. Intorp: Environmental tobacco smoke in real life situations; in: Indoor air ’87, Vol. 2, Environmental tobacco smoke, multicomponent studies, radon, sick buildings, odours and irritants, hyperreactivities and allergies, edited by B. Seifert, H. Esdorn, M. Fisher, H. Rüden, and J. Wegner, Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene, Berlin Germany (1987) 137–141. 15A33. Krull, I.S., T.Y. Fan, and D.H. Fine: Problem of artifacts in the analysis of N-nitroso compounds; Anal. Chem. 50 (1978) 698–701. 15A34. LaVoie, E.J., G. Prokopczyk, J. Rigotty, A. Czech, and A. Rivenson: Tumorigenic activity of the tobacco- specific nitrosamines 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1butanone (NNK), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)1-butanol (iso-NNAL), and N`-nitrosonornicotine on topical application to Sencar mice; Cancer Lett. 37 (1987) 277–283. 15A35. Lijinsky, W., M.D. Reuber, and W.B. Manning: Potent carcinogenicity of nitrosodiethanolamine in rats; Nature 288 (1980) 589–590. 15A36. McCoy, G.D., S.S. Hecht, S. Katayama, and E.L. Wynder: Differential effect of chronic ethanol consumption on the carcinogenicity of N-nitrosopyrrolidine and N’-nitrosonornicotine in male Syrian golden hamsters; Cancer Res. 41 (1981) 2849–2854. 15A37. Montesano, R. and U. Saffiotti: Carcinogenic response of the respiratory tract of Syrian golden hamsters to different doses of diethylnitrosamine; Cancer Res. 28 (1968) 2197–2210. 15A38. Office of Technology Assessment; Factors associated with cancer; in: Cancer risk: assessing and reducing the dangers in our society, Westview Press (1982) 81. 15A39. O’Neill, I.K., R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch: (Editors): N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984).
1457
15A40. Pasternak, L.: Mutagene Wirkung von Dimethylnitrosamin bei Drosophila melanogaster [Mutagenic action of dimethylnitrosamine on Drosophila melanogaster]; Naturwissenschaften 49 (1962) 381; Untersuchungen über die mutagene Wirkung verschiedener Nitrosaminund Nitrosamid-verbindungen [Studies on the mutagenic effect of different nitrosamines and nitrosomethylurea]; Acta Biol. Med. Ger. 10 (1963) 436–438; Untersuchungen über die mutagene Wirkung verschiedener Nitrosaminund Nitrosamid-verbindungen [Studies on the mutagenic effect of different nitrosamines and nitrosomethylurea]; Arzneimittelforschung 14 (1964) 802–804. 15A41. Pensabene, J.W., J.I. Feinberg, E.G. Piotrowski, and W. Fiddler: Occurrence and determination of N-nitrosoproline and N-nitrosopyrrolidine in cured meat products; J. Food Sci. 44 (1979) 1700–1702. 15A42. Pollock, J.R.A.: Aspects of nitrosation in malts and beers. 1. Examination of malts for the presence of N-nitrosoproline, N-nitrososarcosine and N-nitrosopipecolinic acid; J. Inst. Brewing 87 (1981) 356–359. 15A43. Preussmann, R.: Occurrence and exposure to N-nitroso compounds and precursors; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 3–15. 15A44. Prokopczyk, B., J.D. Adams, E.J. LaVoie, and D. Hoffmann: Effect of snuff and nicotine on DNA methylation by 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone; Carcinogenesis 8 (1987) 1395–1397. 15A45. Rapoport, J.A.: 85% Mutatsii v polovoi khromosome pod vliyaniem nitrosoetilmocheviny [85% Mutation in the sex chromosome under the influence of nitrosoethylurea]; Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 146 (1962) 1418–1421; 148 (1962) 696–699. 15A46. Renaud, J.M., S. D’Andres, R. Boudoux, and J. Zuber: TSNA levels in the mainstream smoke of simplified blend prototypes; CORESTA Smoke Technology Meeting, Xian, China (2001). 15A47. Robertson, L.S.: Carcinogens in cigarette smoke; S. Africa Tydsk. Genesskunde (1964) 617. 15A48. Rodgman, A.: The carcinogenicity of foodstuffs; Memorandum (November 19, 1954) pp. 1–35, see www. rjrtdocs.com 506333770 -3804, http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu/tid/trn74d00; Foodstuffs – Carcinogenicity studies; Memorandum (September, 1955) pp. 1–29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501541976 -2004, http://legacy. library.ucsf.edu/tid/byr39d00. 15A49. Rodgman, A.: Personal communication (1960) to M. Senkus, former colleague of J.B. Tindall at Commercial Solvents. 15A50. Sen, N.P. and S. Seaman: On-line combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and total N-nitroso determination apparatus for the determination of N-nitrosamides and other N-nitroso compounds and some recent data on the levels of N-nitrosoproline in foods and beverages; in: N-Nitrosocompounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 137–143. 15A51. Sen, N.P., I. Tessier, and S. Seaman: Determination of N-nitrosoproline and N-nitrososarcosine in malt and beer; J. Agr. Food Chem. 31 (1983) 1033–1036.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1457
11/24/08 2:40:08 PM
1458
15A52. Sen, W.P., J.R. Iyengar, B.D. Donaldson, T. Panalaks, and W.F. Miles: The analysis and occurrence of volatile nitrosamines in cured meat products; in: N-Nitroso compounds in the environment, edited by P. Bogovski and E.A. Walker, IARC, Lyon France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 9 (1975) 49 15A53. Serfontein, W.J.: Reducing the carcinogenic activity of tobacco smoke; Republic of S. Africa Patent 641,432 (March 25, 1964). 15A54. Spiegelhalder, B.: Analysis of malt and malt based beverages: General aspects; in: Environmental carcinogenesis: Selected methods of analysis, Vol. 6: N-Nitroso Compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, I.K. O’Neill, G. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 103–113. 15A55. Tindall, J.B.: Lower nitrosodialkylamines; U.S. Patent No. 2,947,785 (August 2, 1960). 15A56. Tsuda, M. and Y. Kurashima: Tobacco smoking, chewing, and snuff dipping: factors contributing to the endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds; Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 21 (1991) 243–253. 15A57. United States Public Health Service (USPHS): The health consequences of involuntary smoking; A report of the surgeon general, 1986; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 87–8398 (1987). 15A58. Wenke G, A. Rivenson, K.D. Brunnemann, and D. Hoffmann: A study of betel quid. II. Formation of N-nitrosamines during betel quid chewing; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relationship to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 859–866. 15A59. Zak, F.G., J.H. Holzner, J. Singer, and H. Popper: Renal and pulmonary tumors in rats fed dimethylnitrosamine; Cancer Res. 20 (1960) 96–99. 16A01. Department of Health (Canada): Proposed tobacco reporting regulations. Schedule 2. Official methods for the collection of emission data on mainstream smoke; Canada Gazette. Part II. 133 (15) pp. 1781–1784 (July 19, 2000). 17A01. Kawano, T. and S. Muto: Mechanism of peroxidase actions for salicylic acid-induced generation of active oxygen species and an increase in cytosolic calcium in tobacco cell suspension culture; J. Exp. Botany 51 (2000) 685–693. 17B01. Adachi, T., H. Kamiya, and T. Kosuge: Studies on the metabolic products of Bacillus subtilis. IV. Determination and mechanisms of formation of tetramethylpyrazine; J. Pharm. Soc. Japan 84 (1984) 545–548. 17B02. Berlin, J.: Formation of putrescine and cinnamoyl putrescines in tobacco cell cultures; Phytochemistry 20 (1981) 53–55. 17B03. Burton, H.R., R.A. Andersen, P.D. Fleming, and L.R. Walton: Changes in chemical composition of burley tobacco during senescence and curing. 2. Acylated pyridine alkaloids; J. Agr. Food Chem. 36 (1988) 579–584. 17B04. Bush, L.P. and M.W. Crowe: Nicotiana alkaloids; in Toxicants of plant origin, edited by P.R. Cheeke, CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, FL (1989) pp. 87–107. 17B05. Bush, L.P., F.F. Fannin, R.L. Chelvarajan, and H.R. Burton: Biosynthesis and metabolism of nicotine and related alkaloids; in: Nicotine and related alkaloids: Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion,
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
17B06.
17B07.
17B08.
17B09.
17B10.
17B11.
17B12.
17B13.
17B14.
17B15.
17B16.
17B17.
17B18. 17B19.
17B20.
17B21.
17B22.
17B23.
edited by J.W. Gorrod and J. Wahren, Chapman and Hall, London (1993) pp. 1–30. Dawson, R.F.: Alkaloid biogenesis. III. Specificity of the nicotine-nornicotine conversion; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1951) 4218–4221. Dawson, R.F., D.R. Christman, A. D’Adamo, M.L. Solt, and A.P. Wolf: The biosynthesis of nicotine from isotopically labelled nicotinic acids; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82 (1960) 2628–2633. Dawson, R.F., D.R. Christman, M.L. Solt, and A.P. Wolf: The biosynthesis of nicotine from nicotinic acid. Chemical and radiochemical yields; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 91 (1960) 144–150. Dawson, R.F. and T.S. Osdene: A speculative view of tobacco alkaloid biosynthesis; in: Rec. Adv. Phytochem., edited by V.C. Runecles and T.C. Tso, 5 (1972) pp. 317–338. Demain, A.L, M. Jackson, and N.R. Trenner: Thiaminedependent accumulation of tetramethylpyrazine accompanying a mutation in the isoleucine-valine pathway; J. Bacteriology 94 (1967) 323–326. Dewey, L.J., R.D. Byerrum, and C.D. Ball: The biosynthesis of the pyrrolidine ring of nicotine; Biochem. Biophys. Acta 18 (1955) 141–142. Enomoto, Y., H. Masuda, and M. Yoshida: Pyrazine compounds. Recent progress in the studies of pyrazine compounds; Koryo 128 (1980) 91–110. Friedel, P., V. Krampl, T. Radford, J.A. Renner, F.W. Shepard, and M.A. Gianturco: Some constituents of the aroma complex of coffee; J. Agr. Food Chem. 19 (1971) 530–532. Haag, H.B. and P.S. Larson: Some chemical and pharmacological observations on “low nicotine” tobacco; Science 97 (1943) 187–188. Holmstedt, B.: Toxicity of nicotine and related compounds; in: The pharmacology of nicotine, edited by B. Holmstedt, M.J. Rand and K. Thuran, IRL Press, Washington, D.C. (1988) pp. 61–88. Huber, G.L.: Tobacco: Its history, economics, and political influence; in: Tobacco and smoking cessation. I, edited by G.L. Huber, Sem. Resp. Med. 10 (1989) 278–296. Jackanioz, T.M. and R.D. Byerrum: Incorporation of aspartate and malate into the pyridine ring of nicotine; J. Biol. Chem. 241 (1966) 1246–1249. Jackson, K.E.: Alkaloids of tobacco; Chem. Rev. 29 (1941) 123–197. Japan Tobacco and Salt Public Corporation: Tobacco taste and flavor improving agent containing 2,3½-dipyridyl as active component; Japanese Patent J56045183, April 24, 1981. Jenkins, R.W. Jr and R.A. Comes: Exogenous vs. endogenous transfer of nicotine during smoking; Internat. J. Appl. Radiation Isotopes 27 (1976) 323–324. Kanamori-Fukuda, I., H. Ashihara, and A. Komamine: Pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis in Vinca rosea cells: Changes in the activity of de novo and salvage pathways during growth in a suspension culture; J. Exp. Bot. 32 (1981) 69–78. Katz, I., R.A. Wilson, W.J. Evers, M.H. Vock, and G.W. Verhoeve: 2-Methyl-5,7-dihydrothieno[3,4-d]pyrimidine; U.S. Patent No. 3,960,860 (January 6, 1976). Kisaki, T., S. Mizusaki, and E. Tamaki: Phytochemical studies on tobacco alkaloids. XI. A new alkaloid in
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1458
11/24/08 2:40:09 PM
1459
Bibliography
17B24.
17B25.
17B26.
17B27.
17B28.
17B29. 17B30.
17B31.
17B32.
17B33.
17B34.
17B35.
17B36.
17B37.
17B38.
17B39.
17B40.
Nicotiana tabacum roots; Phytochemistry 7 (1968) 323–327. Kisaki, T. and E. Tamaki: Phytochemical studies on the tobacco alkaloids. X. Degradation of the tobacco alkaloids and their optical rotatory changes in tobacco plants; Phytochemistry 5 (1966) 293–300. Kobashi, Y., Y Yamashita, and M. Watanabe: Pyrolysis of tobacco. XV. Thermal behavior of tobacco alkaloids in tobacco leaves; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 37 (1963) 412–416. Koehler, P.E., M.E. Mason, and J.A. Newell: Formation of pyrazine compounds in sugar-amino acid model system; J. Agr. Food Chem. 17 (1969) 393–396. Koehler, P.E. and G.V. Odell: Factors affecting the formation of pyrazine compounds in sugar-amine reactions; J. Agr. Food Chem. 18 (1970) 895–898. Kuffner, F. and E. Kaiser: Über das Nicotellin und die Synthese eines neuen Terpyridyls [On nicotelline and the synthesis of a new terpyridine]; Monatsch. Chem. 85 (1954) 896. Leete, E.: Biogenesis of nicotine; Chem. Ind. (London) (1955) 537. Leete, E.: The biogenesis of the Nicotiana alkaloids. VI. The piperidine ring of anabasine; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1958) 4393–4394. Leete, E: Biosynthesis of the minor alkaloids of tobacco; Research grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM-13246) and the Council for Tobacco Research U.S.A. Inc. (Grant No. 929) (1974) pp. 1–24, see www. rjrtdocs.com 512828673 -8694. Leete, E.: Biosynthesis of anatabine and anabasine in Nicotiana glutinosa; J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1975) 9–10. Leete, E.: Stereochemistry of the reduction of nicotinic acid when it serves as a precursor of anatabine; J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. (1978) 610–611. Leete, E.: Alkaloids derived from ornithine, lysine, and nicotinic acid; in: Secondary plant products, Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New Series, edited by E.A. Bell and B.V. Charlwood (1980) pp. 65–91. Leete, E., E.G. Gros, and T.J. Gilbertson: Biosynthesis of anabasine, origin of the nitrogen of the piperidine ring; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964) 3907–3908. Leete, E. and M.E. Muller: Biomimetic synthesis of anatabine from 2,5-dihydropyridine produced by the oxidative decarboxylation of baikiain; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (1982) 6440–6444. Leete, E. and S.A. Slattery: Incorporation of [2–14C]and [6–14C] nicotinic acid into the tobacco alkaloids. Biosynthesis of anatabine and A,B-dipyridyl; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 6326–6330. Markwood, L.N.: A review of information on nornicotine; Pamphlet E-561 USDA, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, USDA, Washington, DC (1942). Matsushima, S., T. Ohsumi, and S. Sugawara: Composition of trace alkaloids in tobacco leaf lamina; Agric. Biol. Chem. 47 (1983) 507–510. Mays, C.D., T.H. Edwards, and R.F. Moates: Expansion of tobacco with ammonia-carbon dioxide; RDR, 1973, No. 2, February 28, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501002997 -3006. Effect of ammonium salts on the levels of pyridines and pyrazines in smoke, see also Ref. 3261. Rodgman, A.: “Smoke pH”: A review; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2000) 117–139, and Ref. 1369. Green, C.R., J.M.
17B41.
17B41a. 17B42.
17B43.
17B44.
17B45.
17B46. 17B47.
17B48.
17B49.
17B50.
17B51.
17B52. 17B53.
17B54.
17B55.
17B56.
Martin, and A. Rodgman: Effect of treatment of tobacco with ammonia or various ammonium salts on the levels of pyridines and pyrazines in smoke; RDR, 1976, No. 3, January 29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501003985 -4047. Mizusaki, S., Y. Tanabe, M. Noguchi, and E. Tamaki: Phytochemical studies on tobacco alkaloids. XIV. The occurrence and properties of putrescine N-methyltransferase in tobacco roots; Plant Cell Physiol. 12 (1971) 633–640. Mozayani, A.: Phencyclidine: Effects on human performance and behavior; Forensic Sci. Rev. 15 (2002) 61–73. Pailer, M.: Chemistry of nicotine and related compounds (including biosynthetic aspects); in: Tobacco alkaloids and related compounds, edited by U.S. Von Euler, MacMillan, New York, NY (1965) pp. 15–36. Pictet, A. and A. Rotschy: Synthese des Nikotins [Synthesis of nicotine]; Chem. Ber. 37 (1904) 1225–1235. Pinner, A.: Über Nicotin. Die Constitution des Alkaloids [On nicotine. The constitution of alkaloids]. Chem. Ber. 26 (1893) 292–305. Santoso, D. and R. Thornburg: Uridine 5-monophosphate synthase is transcriptionally regulated by pyrimidine levels in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia; Plant Physiol. 116 (1998) 815–821. Schonberg, A. and R. Moubacher: The Strecker degradation of A-amino acids; Chem. Rev. 50 (1972) 261–277. Schonberg, A., R. Moubacher, and A. Mostofa: Degradation of A-amino acids to aldehydes and ketones by interaction with carbonyl compounds; J. Chem. Soc. (1948) 176–182. Seeman, J.I., J.A. Fournier, J.B. Paine III, and B.E. Waymack: The form of nicotine in tobacco. Thermal transfer of nicotine and nicotine acid salts to nicotine in the gas phase; J. Agr. Food Chem. 47 (1999) 5133–5145. Severson, R.F., R.F. Arrendale, H.G. Cutler, D. Jones, V.A. Sisson, and M.G. Stephenson: Chemistry and biological activity of acylnornicotines from Nicotiana respondae, in: Am. Chem. Soc. Sym. Series No. 380, H.G. Cutler (ed), Am. Chem. Soc. (1988) pp. 335–362. Shigematsu, H., S. Shibata, T. Kurata, H. Kato, and M. Kujimaki: Thermal degradation products of several Amadori compounds; Agr. Biol. Chem. 41 (1977) 2377–2385. Shu, C-K.: Pyrazine formation from amino acids and reducing sugars, a pathway other than Strecker degradation; J. Agr. Food Chem. 46 (1998) 1515–1517. Smeeton, B. W.: Genetic control of tobacco quality; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 13 (1987) 3–26. Smith, C.R.: Occurrence of anabasine in Nicotiana glauca R. Grah. (Solanaceae); J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57 (1935) 959–960. Solt, M.L., R.F. Dawson, and D.R. Christman: Biosynthesis of anabasine and of nicotine by excised root cultures of Nicotiana glauca; Plant Physiol. 35 (1960) 887–894. Späth, E. and F. Kesztler: Über neue Tabakalkaloide. XII. Über das Vorkommen von d,l-Nornikotin, d,l-Anatabin und l-Anabasin in Tabak [New tobacco alkaloids. XII. On the occurrence of d,l-nornicotine, d,l-anatabine and l-anabasine in tobacco]; Chem. Ber. 70 (1937) 704–709. Strunz, G.M. and J.A. Findley: Pyridine and piperidine alkaloids, in: The alkaloids, edited by A. Brossi, Academic Press, New York, 26 (1985) 89–183.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1459
11/24/08 2:40:09 PM
1460
17B57. Tsuchida, H., S. Tachibana, K. Kitamura, and M. Komoto: Formation of deoxyfructosazine and its 6-isomer by the browning reaction between fructose and ammonium formate; Agric. Biol. Chem. 40 (1976) 921–925. 17B58. Unpublished work with Y.Y. Liu, Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, 1972. 17B59. Velisek, J., J. Davidek, J. Cuhrova, and V. Kubelka: Volatile heterocyclic compounds in the reaction of glyoxal with glycine; J. Agr. Food Chem. 24 (1976) 3–7. 17B60. Wang, P.S. and G.V. Odell: Formation of pyrazines from thermal treatment of some amino-hydroxy compounds; J. Agr. Food Chem. (1973) 868–871. 17B61. Woodward, C.F., C.O. Badgett, and J.J. Willaman: Catalytic vapor-phase oxidation of nicotine to nicotinonitrile; Ind. Eng. Chem. 36 (1944) 540–544. 17B62. Yang, K.S., K.K. Gholson, and G.K. Waller: Nicotine biosynthesis; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87 (1965) 4184–4188. 17B63. Yang, Y.: Putrescine biosynthetic enzymes in tobacco roots: Purification, properties and function; M.Sc. Thesis (1984) University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 17B64. Yoshida, D. and T. Mitake: Agmatine and N-carbamylputrescine as intermediates in the formation of nicotine by tobacco plants; Plant Cell Physiol. 7 (1966) 301–305. 17B65. Zador, E. and D. Jones: Biosynthesis of a novel nicotinoid alkaloid in the trichomes of Nicotiana stocktonii; Plant Physiol. 82 (1986) 479–484. 17D01. Gilchrist, T.L.: Heterocyclic chemistry; Pitman Publishing; London: 1985. 17D02. Herbert, R.B.: The biosynthesis of plant alkaloids and nitrogenous microbial metabolites; Nat. Prod. Rep. 16 (1999) 199–208. 17D03. Hodge, J.E.: Dehydrated foods: Chemistry of browning reactions in model systems; J. Agr. Food Chem. 1 (1953) 928–943. 17D04. Hwang, H.I., G.H. Thomas, T.R. Robert, J. Lech, and C.T. Ho: Formation of pyrazines from the Maillard reaction of glucose and lysine-A-amine-15N; J. Agr. Food Chem. 42 (1994) 1000–1004. 17D05. Maga, J.A.: Pyrazine update; Food Rev. Int. 8 (1992) 479–558. 17D06. Maga, J.A.: The chemistry of oxazoles and oxazolines in foods; Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 14 (1981) 295–307. 17D07. Nagodawithana, T.W.: Flavor enhancers; in: Savory flavors, Esteekay Associates, Milwaukee, WI (1995) 1–468. 17E01. Wu, R., S. Bai, N. Ge, Y. Jiang, and S. Qiao: Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke condensate; Sepu 7 (1989) 52–54. 17F01. Manabe, A., O. Wada, M. Morita, S. Izumikawa, K. Asakuno, and H. Suzuki: Occurrence of carcinogenic amino-A-carbolines in some environmental sample; Environ. Pollut. 75 (1991) 301–305. 18A01 Alford, E. and S. Houpt: Identification of the sulfur compounds in gas phase smoke; Brown & Williams Tobacco Company Report, FLN-B104–87, August 28, 1987, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu 620810562/0564. 18A02. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC): in: Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists, 15th ed. (1990) Protein determination: Methods 979.09, 920.87; Sulfur dioxide determination: Method 20.114. 18A03. Ayya, N.: Notes concerning importance of S-compounds to smoke sensory properties: Are there any analogies to
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
18A04.
18A05.
18A06.
18A07.
18A08.
18A09.
18A10.
18A11.
18A12.
18A13.
18A14.
18B01.
18B02.
18B03.
18B04.
18B05.
18B06.
ammonia chemistry?; Brown and Williams Tobacco Company Report, FLN-B046–94c, April 26, 1994, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu 570268430/8437. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 1–97, see http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/ Classification/crthgr04.php. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Sulfur dioxide and some sulfites, bisulfites and metabisulfites; in: Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans; IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 54 (1992). Johnson, C.M. and H. Nishita: Micro-estimation of sulphur in plant materials, soils and irrigation waters; Anal. Chem. 24 (1952) 736–742. Keen, C.L., T. Jue, C.D. Tran, J. Vogel, R.G. Downing, V. Iyengar, and R.B. Rucker: Analytical methods: improvements, advancements and new horizons; J. Nutr. 133 (2003) 1574S-1578S. Littlefield, E.S., R.O. Miller, and R.M Carlson: Determination of sulfate-sulfur in plant tissue by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry; Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21 (1990) 1577–1586. Lohmann, W.: The presence of sulfur in cigarettes as determined by EPR studies; J. Arkansas Med. Soc. 61 (1964) 99–101. Mottershead, B. E.: Estimation of sulfur in biological materials using the Technicon AutoAnalyzer; Laboratory Practice 20 (1971) 483–484. Reuveny, Z.: Regulation of ATP sulfurylase in cultured tobacco cells; Diss. Abstr. 9 (1975) 4450, Michigan State Univ. Ph.D. Thesis, pp. 1–184. Rezanka, T., M. Sobotka, J. Spizek, and K. Sigler: Pharmacologically active sulfur-containing compounds; Anti-Infective Agents in Medicinal Chemistry 5 (2006) 187–224. Sah, R.N. and R.O. Miller: Spontaneous reaction for acid dissolution of biological tissues in closed vessels; Anal. Chem. 64 (1992) 230–233. Schmid, E., G. Bachlechner, K. Varmuza, H. Klus: Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic sulfur and oxygen heterocycles in cigarette smoke condensate; Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 322 (1985) 213–219. Anonymous: Laboratory Information Bulletin, Number 2722; Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 12 (1974) 717–720. Anonymous: Residues: Chlorinated and organophosphate pesticides; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 48 (1965) 1158–1160. Anonymous: Residues: Chlorinated and organophosphate pesticides; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem.70 (1987) 724–726. Berry, D.L., T.J. Slaga, J. DiGiovanni, and M.R. Juchau: Chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polybrominated biphenyls, and polychlorinated biphenyls in a two-stage system of mouse skin tumorigenesis: Potent anticarcinogenic effects; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 320 (1979) 405–414. Bodnar J.A.: Freon 134A expanded tobacco analyses; Report ACD KAB (1992), May 18, see www.rjrtdocs. com 512058257 -8258. Bodnar, J., M. Borgerding, C. Morrison, J. Rogers, and F. Wendelboe: Alternate tobacco expansion agent research.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1460
11/24/08 2:40:09 PM
1461
Bibliography
18B07.
18B08.
18B09.
18B10.
18B11.
18B12.
18B13.
18B14.
18B15.
18B16. 18B17.
18B18.
18B19.
19A01.
19A02.
Chemical analysis status, update; Report, August 29, 1991, see www.rjrtdocs.com 512826580 -6609. Canady, R., K. Crump, M. Feeley, J. Freijer, M. Kogevinas, R. Malisch, P. Verger, J. Wilson, and M. Zeilmaker: WHO Food Additives Series:48, Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls; World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002, see http://www. inchem.org/documents/jecfa/jecmono/v48je01.htm. Coggins, C.R.E., A.T. Mosberg, and P.H. Ayres: Comparative inhalation study using cigarettes containing tobacco expanded with Freon 11 or Freon 123. Report on in-life, necropsy, fast-track histopathology; R&DM, 1990, No. 75, April 7, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508209378 -9425. Cohen, G.M., W.P. Bracken, R.P. Iyer, D.L. Berry, and T.J. Slaga: Anticarcinogenic effects of 2,3,7,8- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on benzo[a]pyrene and 7,12 dimethylbenz[a]anthracene tumor initiation and its relationship to DNA binding; Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 4027–4033. Courtney, K.D., D.W. Gaylor, M.D. Hogan, H.L. Falk, R.R. Bates, and I. Mitchell: Teratogenic evaluation of 2,4,5-T; Science, 168 (1970) 864–866. Courtney, K.D. and J.A. Moore: Teratology studies with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 20 (1971) 396–403. DiGiovanni, J.; D.L. Berry, G.L. Gleason, G.S. Kishore, and T.J. Slaga: Time-dependent inhibition by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin of skin tumorigenesis with polycyclic hydrocarbons; Cancer Res. 40 (1980) 1580–1587. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Pesticide analytical manual, Volume I (PAM) 3rd Ed. and Vol. II (PAM), and Index of Residue Analytical Methods (RAM), Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. (1994), see http://www.epa.gov/oppbead1/methods/ and http:// www.epa.gov/oppbead1/methods/ram12b.htm. Gichner, T., P. Lovecká, L. Kochánková, M. Macková, and K. Demnerová: Monitoring toxicity, DNA damage, and somatic mutations in tobacco plants growing in soil heavily polluted with polychlorinated biphenyls; Mutation Res. 629 (2007) 1–6. Radovanović, B.S. and Z. Mišić: Gas chromatographic analysis of some toxic organic compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke; Facta Universitatas (Working Living Environ. Protection) 1 (1998) 59–65. Steele, R.H.: Agenda; Report, July 27, 1990, see www. rjrtdocs.com 507953075 -3105. Steele, R.H.: Perfluoropropane and sulfur hexafluoride; Letter 1988, December 13, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506834285 -4287. Ware, G.W. and D.M. Whitacre: The pesticide book, 6th Ed.; Meister Media Worldwide, Willoughby, OH (2004) 488 pp. Wassom, J.S., J.E. Huff, and N. Loprieno: A review of the genetic toxicology of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins; Mutation Res. 47 (1977/1978) 141–160. Collins, P.F., W.W. Lawrence, and J.F Williams: An automated procedure for the determination of ammonia in tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 6 (1972) 167–172. Counts, M.E., F.S. Hsu, S.W. Laffoon, R.W. Dwyer, and R.H. Cox: Mainstream smoke constituent yields and
19A03.
19A04.
19A05.
19A06.
19A07.
19A08.
20A01.
20A02.
20A03.
20A04. 20A05.
20A06. 20A07.
20A08.
20A09.
predicting relationships from a worldwide market sample of cigarette brands: ISO smoking conditions; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39 (2004) 111–134. Counts, M.E., M.J. Morton, S.W. Laffoon, R.H. Cox, and P.J. Lipowicz: Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 41 (2005) 185–227. Dăneţ, A.F., M.C. Cheregi, and M. Badea: Leonardo da Vinci Programme: Pilot Project No. RO/02/B/F/ PP-141004, Training module for environmental pollution control: Environmental pollution, monitoring pollution, analysis, legislation, quality assurance and management; see www.unibuc.ro/hosting/leonardo, University of Bucharest, Romania 2005. Norman, A.: Cigarette design and materials; Chapter 11B in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK (1999) 353–387. Routh, W.E.: Method for the determination of fixed gases in cigarette smoke; Report 11, November 19 1971, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu 01045384/5394. Saltzman, B.E.: Colorimetric micro-determination of nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere; Anal. Chem. 26 (1954) 1949–1955. Walkins, J.B.: Application Note (ANC-19–70): Routine analysis of CO2, H2, O2, N2, CH4 and CO2 by gas chromatography; Hewlett-Packard Company, Avondale, PA 1970. Abel, E., M. Sladkova, M. Uralova, and J. Huszar: Polonium 210 in tobacco and tobacco products in Slovakia; Vysk. Ust. Hyg. Bratislava (Czechoslovakia) 19 (1974) 475–479. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Toxicological profile for beryllium; Atlanta, GA, USA, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2002), see http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp4.html. Anderson, I. and H.J Evans: Effect of manganese and certain other metal cations on isocitric dehydrogenase and malic enzyme activities in Phaseolus vulgaris; Plant Physiol. 31 (1956) 22–28. Andren, A.W. and R.C. Harriss: Mercury in tobaccos; Environ. Letters 1 (1971) 231–234. Arnon, D.I. and P.R. Stout: Molybdenum as an essential element for higher plants; Plant Physiol. 14 (1939) 599–602. Barden, J.A., R.G. Halfacre, and D.J. Parrish: Plant science; McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1987. Blot, W.J., J.Y. Li, P.R. Taylor, W. Guo, S. Dawsey, G.Q. Wang, C.S. Yang, S.F. Zheng, M. Gail, G.Y. Li, Y. Yu, B. Liu, J. Tangrea, Y. Sun, F. Liu, J.F. Fraumeni, Y. Zhang Jr, and B. Li: Nutrition intervention trials in Linxian, China: Supplementation with specific vitamin/mineral combinations, cancer incidence, and disease-specific mortality in the general population; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85 (1993) 1483–1491. Bock, R.A.: Handbook of decomposition methods in analytical chemistry, 1st ed.; John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979. Clark, L.C., G.F. Combs, B.W. Turnbull, E.H. Slate, D.K. Chalker, J. Chow, L.S. Davis, R.A. Glover, G.F. Graham, E.G. Gross, A. Krongrad, J.L. Lesher, H.K. Park, B.B. Sanders, C.L. Smith, and J.R. Taylor: Effects
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1461
11/24/08 2:40:09 PM
1462
20A10.
20A11.
20A12.
20A13. 20A14.
20A15.
20A16.
20A17.
20A18. 20A19. 20A20.
20A21. 20A22.
20A23.
20A24.
20A25.
20A26.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin: A randomized controlled trial; Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group; J. Am. Med. Assoc. 276 (1996) 1957–1963. Coffey, C.: Forage resource management and integration; Pasture & Range: December 2003, The Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK, 1–6, see 17A3. Comes, R.A., M.T. Core, R.W. Jenkins Jr, T.S. Osdene, R.J. Tucci, and T.G. Williamson: Naturally occurring 222 radon daughters in tobacco and smoke condensate; 1978 Philip Morris Report, Bates Number: 1005142962/2987, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/doy38e00. De Flora, S.: Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium(VI) carcinogenesis; Carcinogenesis 21 (2000) 533–541. Dixon, D. and E.C. Webb: Enzymes; Academic Press, New York, NY (1958). Duffield-Lillico, A.J., M.E. Reid, B.W. Turnbull, G.F. Combs, E.H. Slate, L.A. Fischbach, J.R. Marshall, and L.C. Clark: Baseline characteristics and the effect of selenium supplementation on cancer incidence in a randomized clinical trial: A summary report of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial; Cancer Epid. Biomarkers Prev. 11 (2002) 630–639. El-Bayoumy, K.: The protective role of selenium on genetic damage and on cancer; Mutation Research 475 (2001) 123–139. Ellington, J.J. and J.J. Evans: Determination of perchlorate at parts-per-billion levels in plants by ion chromatography; J. Chromatogr. A898 (2000) 193–199. Ellington, J.J., N.L. Wolfe, A.W. Garrison, J.J. Evans, J.K. Avants, and Q. Teng: Determination of perchlorate in tobacco plants and tobacco products; Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 3213–3218. Evans, H.J.: Role of molybdenum in plant nutrition; Soil Sci. 81 (1956) 199–208. Evans, H.J.: Mineral nutrition of trees, a symposium; Duke University Sch. Forestry Bull. 15 (1959) 55–62. Evans, H.J. and S. Russell: The role of minerals in plant metabolism and the relationship of mineral nutrition to plant composition; University of Kentucky Tobacco and Health Workshop Proceedings, October 6, 1964, Bates Nos. 504904046/4069, see http://legacy.library.ucsf. edu/tid/vtw35d00. Fassel, V.A.: Quantitative elemental analyses by plasma emission spectroscopy; Science 202 (1978) 183–191. Fışkın, A., A. Özkan, and A. Ayhan: Protective effect of selenium and vitamin E on lipid peroxidation in smokeexposed male mice; Turk. J. Biochem. 30 (2005) 232–235. Gibbs, W.D., C.C. Lushbaugh, and H.D. Hodges: Radioactivity of cigarettes; Res. Rept. Oak Ridge Inst. Nucl. Sci., ORINS-49 (1964) 105–107. Going, R.E., S.C. Hsu, R.L. Pollack, and L.D. Haugh: Sugar and fluoride content of various forms of tobacco; J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 100 (1980) 27–33. Grandeau, L.: C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 54 (1862) 1057– 1059, see Grandeau, L.: Recherches sur la présence du rubidium et du coesium dans les eaux naturelles, les minéraux, et les végétaux [Research on the presence of rubidium and cesium in natural water, minerals and plants]; Paris, Mallet-Bachelier 1 (1863) 84. Heffer, W. and Sons: Bibliography of the more important heavy metals occurring in food and biological materials; Cambridge, England (1934), p. 30.
20A27. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 58 (1994a) 1–444. 20A28. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Beryllium and beryllium compounds; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 58 (1994b) 41–117. 20A29. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Cadmium and cadmium compounds; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 58 (1993c) 119–237. 20A30. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Carbon black, titanium dioxide and non-asbestiform talc; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 93 (in preparation). 20A31. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chlorinated drinking-water; chlorination by-products; some other halogenated compounds; cobalt and cobalt compounds; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 52 (1991) 1–544. 20A32. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Chromium, nickel and welding; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 49 (1990) 1–677. 20A33. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Cobalt in hard metals and cobalt sulfate, gallium arsenide, indium phosphide and vanadium pentoxide; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 86 (2006) 1–330. 20A34. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Ingested nitrates and nitrites, and cyanobacterial peptide toxins; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 94 (in preparation). 20A35. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Inorganic and organic lead compounds; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 87 (2006) 1–519. 20A36. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: An updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42; IARC Monograph Suppl. 7 (1987) 440. 20A37. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Man-made mineral fibres and radon; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 43 (1988) 1–300. 20A38. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Printing processes and printing inks, carbon black and some nitrocompounds; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 65 (1996) 1–578. 20A39. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Silica, some silicates, coal dust and para-aramid fibrils; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 68 (1997) 1–506. 20A40. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Smokeless tobacco products; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 89 (in preparation). 20A41. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some internally deposited radionuclides; Monographs
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1462
11/24/08 2:40:09 PM
1463
Bibliography
20A42.
20A43.
20A44.
20A45.
20A46.
20A47.
20A48.
20A49. 20A50.
20A51.
20A52.
20A53.
20A54.
20A55. 20A56.
20A57. 20A58.
20A59.
on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 78 (2001) 1–596. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some metals and metallic compounds, Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 23 (1980) 1–438. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Some organic solvents, resin monomers and related compounds, pigments and occupational exposures in paint manufacture and painting; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 47 (1989) 1–535 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Tobacco habits other than smoking; betel-quid and areca-nut chewing; and some related nitrosamines; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 37 (1985) 1–291. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking; Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans; IARC Monograph 83 (2004) 1–1452. Ip, I.: Anticarcinogenic effect of selenium in the dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumor model in rats; J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61 (1984) 1881–1887. Isakander, F.Y., T.L. Bauer and D.E. Klein: Determination of 28 elements in American cigarette tobacco by neutron-activation analysis; Analyst 111 (1986) 107–109. Ivanova, J., R. Djingova, and I. Kuleff: Possibilities of ED-XRF with radionuclide sources for analysis of plants; J. Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chem. 242 (1999) 569–575. Jenkins, R.A.: Selected metals in cigarette tobaccos and smoke; IARC Sci. Pub1. 71 (1986) 129–138. Jenkins, R.A.: Occurrence of selected metals in cigarette tobaccos and smoke; IARC Sci. Publ. 71 (1986) 129–138. Jimoh, M.A.: Development of hyphenated micro-analytical methods for trace metal fractionation and their application to environmentally relevant solid matrices; Doctoral Thesis in Natural Sciences, University of Berlin, 2006. John, J.E.: Bibliography on the analysis and toxicology of heavy metals in tobacco and smoke; Philip Morris, May 22, 1979, Bates Nos.1003579862, 1003579862/9867, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ajv08e00. Jones, J.B. Jr and V.W. Case: Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples; in: Soil testing and plant analysis, 3rd ed., edited by R.L. Waterman, Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc. Madison, WI (1990) 389–447. Jones, J.L. and C.A. Wilkinson: Fifty years of agronomic achievement in tobacco science; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 22 (1996) 61–130. Joyet, G.: The thorium-series in cigarettes and in lungs of smokers; Experientia 27 (1971) 85–89. Ju, H.-Y., B.B. Bible, and C. Chong: Influence of ionic thiocyanate on growth of cabbage, bean, and tobacco; J. Chem. Ecology 9 (1983) 1255–1262. LeCompte, S.B.: Studies on black tobacco; Conn. Sta. Bul. 448 (1944) 114–117. Von Liebig, Justus: Organic chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology; Lyon Playfair (Ed), Bradbury and Evans, Whitefriars, London 1840. Liu W., Z. Li, Z. Chen, B. Wang, H. Shi, G. Yang, and Y. Zhang: A study of the determination of several heavy
20A60. 20A61.
20A62.
20A63.
20A64.
20A65.
20A66.
20A67.
20A68.
20A69. 20A70.
20A71.
20A72.
20A73.
20A74.
20A75.
metals in tobacco and a tobacco additive by solid phase extraction and HPLC; CORESTA Mtg. Smoke Sci. Prod. Technol. Groups, Freiburg, 2003, Abstr. ST 07. Malmstrom, B.G. and J.B. Neilands: Metalloproteins; Ann. Rev. Biochem. 33 (1964) 331–354. Marinov, V., D. Apostolov, and M. Lazarova: Determination of the contents of 20 microelements in tobacco by neutron activation analysis after elimination of sodium-24 and potassium-42; Nucl. Sci. Abstr. 33(1) (1976), Abstr. No. 5, see Report INIS-MF-1484, 1974, pp.1–10. Martin, J.M.: Tracor X-ray laboratory applications report. Analysis of tobacco samples for R.J. Reynolds Company, 1982, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511838127 -8137. Maynor, H.W. and S. Hashimoto: Automated ion chromatography method for determining sodium, ammonium (total, aqueous, and hydrolyzed), and potassium cations in tobacco; Brown and Williamson Report, April, 6, 1987, Bates Number: 472000910/0964, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zaq31f00. McElroy, W.D. in: Symposium on nutrition, edited by R.M. Herriott, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1953. McElroy, W.D. and A. Nason: Mechanism of action of micronutrient elements in enzyme systems; Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 5 (1954) 1–30. McMurtrey, J.E. Jr: Deficiencies of secondary and micronutrient elements in plants; Better Crops with Plant Food 36 (1952) 19–26, 42–48. Morgan, W.R.: Metals in tobacco; Philip Morris report, September 1 1987, Bates Nos. 2025006113/6123, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jyk87e00. Morgan, W.R. and C.H. Akers: Pyrolysis and combustion of tobacco: Special transfer of metals into mainstream cigarette smoke; Philip Morris report, December 6, 1982, Bates Nos. 2505270074/0112, see http://legacy. library.ucsf.edu/tid/bdq39c00. Morie, G.P. and C.H. Sloan: U.S. Defensive Publication, T 901 (1972) 204. Nadkarni, R.A.: Re-evaluation of arsenic concentration in the biological standards; Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 19 (1974) 127–134. Nadkarni, R.A. and W.D. Ehmann: Determination of trace elements in standard reference cigarette by neutron activation analysis; Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 2 (1969) 161–168. Nadkarni, R.A. and W.D. Ehmann: Determination of trace elements in tobacco products by neutron activation analysis; Proc. 1969 Tob. and Health Workshop, Lexington, Kentucky, Tobacco and Health Research Institute, University of Kentucky, Conf. Rep. No. 1, pp. 47–57. Nadkarni, R.A. and W.D. Ehmann: Further analyses of University of Kentucky reference and alkaloid series cigarettes by instrumental neutron activation analysis; Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 4 (1970) 325–335. Nadkarni, R.A. and W.D. Ehmann: Instrumental neutron activation analysis of tobacco products; Proc. Modern Trends in Activation Analysis, Gaithersburg, MD, 1968, National Bureau of Standards (Washington, DC) Publ. No. 312 (1969) 190–196. Nadkarni, R.A. and W.D. Ehmann: Relative transference of trace elements from tobacco smoke condensate into mice tissues; Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 11 (1972) 45–47.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1463
11/24/08 2:40:10 PM
1464
20A76. Nadkarni, R.A. and B.C. Haldar: Neutron activation analysis of copper by substoichiometric extraction with neocuproine; Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 1504–1506. 20A77. Nadkarni, R.A. and B.C. Haldar: Simultaneous determination of chromium and zinc by neutron activation analysis; Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. 9 (1971) 233–240. 20A78. Nadkarni, R.A. and B.C. Haldar: Substoichiometric determination of mercury by neutron activation analysis; J. Radioanal. Chem. 10 (1972) 181–186. 20A79. Nadkarni, R.A. and G.H. Morrison: Multielement instrumental neutron activation analysis of biological materials; Anal. Chem. 45 (1973) 1957–1960. 20A80. Nason, A.: The function of metals in enzyme systems; Soil Sci. 85 (1958) 63–77. 20A81. Nason, A. and W.C. McElroy: Plant physiology: A treatise, Vol. 3, edited by F.C. Steward, Academic Press, New York, NY (1963). 20A82. National Cancer Institute: Antioxidants and Cancer Prevention: Fact Sheet (2004), see http://www.cancer. gov/cancertopics/factsheet/antioxidantsprevention. 20A83. Nicholas, D.J.D.: Role of trace elements in the nitrogen metabolism of plants with special reference to microorganisms; J. Sci. Food Agric. 8 (1957), (Supplemental) s15-s25. 20A84. Nicholas, D.J.D.: Minor mineral nutrients; Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 12 (1961) 63–90. 20A85. Perini, F.R.: Multiple transition metal ion analysis by ion chromatography in tobacco and related matrices; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 52, 1999, pp. 48–49. 20A86. Peterson, L.A. and T.W. Tibbitts: Chemical composition of tobacco in relationship to leaf burn and quality; Agron. J. 55 (1963) 114–116. 20A87. Petushkov, A.A., M.R. Zel’tser, and A.I. Medvedovskii: Thorium-228 content in tobacco and the human body; (Russian) Gig. Sanit. 37 (1972) 113–114. 20A88. Pool, B.L., I. Janowsky, P. Klein, R.G. Klein, P. Schmezer, G. Vogt-Leucht and W.J. Zeller: Effects of SO2 or NOx on toxic and genotoxic properties of chemical carcinogens. I. In vitro studies; Carcinogenesis 9 (1988) 1237–1246. 20A89. Rennenberg, H., G. Reski, and A. Polle: Hydrogen sulfide emission by cultured tobacco cells; Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 111 (1983) 189–202. 20A90. Rhoades, C.B. and R.T. White: Mainstream smoke collection by electrostatic precipitation for acid dissolution in a microwave digestion system prior to trace metal determination; J. AOAC Int. 80 (1997) 1320–1331. 20A91. Schneider, G. and V. Krivan: Multielement analysis of tobacco and smoke condensate by instrumental neutron activation analysis and atomic absorption spectrometry; lnternat. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 53 (1993) 87–100. 20A92. Shamberger, R.J.: Relationship of selenium to cancer. I. Inhibitory effect of selenium on carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 44 (1970) 931–936. 20A93. Shamberger, R.J., F.F. Baughman, S.L. Kalchert, C.E. Willis, and G.C. Hoffman: Carcinogen-induced chromosomal breakage decreased by antioxidants; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 70 (1973) 1461–1463. 20A94. Sigg, L., F. Black, J. Buffle, J. Cao, R.F.M.J Cleven, W. Davison, J. Galceran, P. Gunkel, E.J.J. Kalis, D. Kistler, M. Martin, S. Noel, Y. Nur, N. Odzak, J. Puy, W.H. Van Riemsdijk, E.J.M. Temminghoff, M.-L. Tercier-
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
20A95.
20A96.
20A97. 20A98. 20A99.
20A100.
20A101. 20A102.
20A103.
20A104.
20A105. 20A106.
20A107. 20A108.
20A109.
20A110. 20A111.
20A112.
20A113.
Waeber, S. Toepperwien, R.M. Town, E. Unsworth, K.W. Warnken, L.P. Weng, H. Xue, and H. Zhang: Comparison of analytical techniques for dynamic trace metal speciation in natural freshwaters; Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (2006) 1934–1941. Sogor, C., A. Gaspar, and J. Posta: Flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of total chromium and Cr(VI) in cigarette ash and smoke using flow injection/hydraulic high-pressure sample introduction; Microchemical J. 58 (1998) 251–255. Sommer, A.L. and C.B. Lipman: Evidence of the indispensable nature of boron and zinc for higher green plants; Plant Physiol. 1 (1926) 231–249. Spiers, F.W. and R.D. Passey: Radioactivity of tobacco and lung cancer; Lancet 265 (1953) 1259–1260. Steinberg, R.A. and T.C. Tso: Physiology of the tobacco plant; Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 9 (1958) 151–174. Stöber, W.: Generation, size distribution and composition of tobacco smoke aerosols; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 8 (1982) 3–41. Stohs, S.J., D. Bagchi and M. Bagchi: Toxicity of trace elements in tobacco smoke; Inhalation Toxicol. 9 (1997) 867–890. Sutcliffe, J.F.: Mineral salts absorption in plants; Pergamon Press New York, NY (1962). Thompson, H.J.: Effect of deficiencies of selenium and vitamin E alone or in combination on the induction of mammary carcinogenesis by 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea; Carcinogenesis 12 (1991) 2175–2179. Thompson, W.H., P.B. Leege, P. Millner, and M.E. Watson: Test methods for the examination of composting and compost; U.S. Composting Council (2002), see http://www.tmecc.org/tmecc. Till, D.E., P.L. Levins, and D.H. Koch: Permanganate tobacco smoke filter; U.S. Patent 3,434,479, March 25, 1969. Tso, T.C.: Micro- and secondary-elements in tobacco; Botan. Bull. Acad. Sinica 7 (1966) 28–63. Tso, T.C., J.E. McMurtrey Jr, and R.N. Jeffrey: Mineral deficiency and organic constituents in tobacco plants. III. Plant growth and alkaloid contents related to gradual development of calcium or boron deficiency symptoms; Plant Physiol. 37 (1962) 804–808, see 3984. USPHS: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79–50066 (1979) 14 59. USPHS: Smoking and health. A report of the Surgeon General; DHEW Publ. No. (PHS) 79–50066 (1979) 14 94. USPHS: The health consequences of smoking. Cancer. A report of the Surgeon General; DHHS Publ. No. (PHS) 82–50179 (1982) 200. Vallee, B.L.: Zinc and metalloenzymes; Advances Protein Chem. 10 (1955) 317. Warrington, K.: The effect of boric acid and borax on the broad bean and certain other plants; Ann. Bol. 37 (1923) 629–672. White, R.T. Jr: Metal analysis of tobacco -based flavors. Elemental analysis of reaction flavors; R.J. Reynolds Report, October 10, 1991, see Bates no. 507867940/7944, http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/nok14d00, also see 4229 and 4230. Witting, C., U. Witting, and V. Krieg: The tumor-protective effect of selenium in an experimental model; J. Cancer Res. Clinical Oncology 104 (1982) 109–113.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1464
11/24/08 2:40:10 PM
Bibliography
20A114. Wolfe, N.L., J.J Ellington, A.W. Garrison, J.J. Evans, J.K. Avants, and Q. Teng: Accumulation of perchlorate in tobacco plants and tobacco products. Paper presented before the Division of Fertilizer and Soil Chemistry at the American Chemical Society 220th National Meeting, Washington, DC, August 20–24, 2000. 20A115. Yang, M., S. Lai, and S. Yeh: Multielement determination in tobacco leaves by instrumental neutron activation analysis; Radioisotopes 22 (1973) 118–123. 20A116. Zuurbier, M. and P. Van den Hazel: PINCHE project: Final report WP4 Risk and Health Impact Assessment; Public Health Services Gelderland Midden, Arnhem, The Netherlands, 2005. 21A01. Akol, A.M., P.G.N. Njagi, S. Sithanantham, and J.M. Mueke: Effects of two Neem insecticide formulations on the attractiveness, acceptability and suitability of diamondback moth larvae to the parasitoid, Diadegma mollipla (Holmgren) (Hym., Ichneumonidae); J. App. Entomol. 127 (2003) 325–331. 21A02. Aspelin, A.L.: Part two: Background on history of pesticide use and regulation in the United States, Chapter 2 in: Pesticide Usage in the United States: Trends During the 20th Century, Center for Integrated Pest Management, Technical Bulletin 105, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (2003) 1–21. 21A03. Atallah, Y.H. and H.W. Dorough: Insecticide residues in cigarette smoke. Transfer and fate in rats; J. Agr. Food Chem. 23 (1975) 64–71. 21A04. Atallah, Y.H., H.W. Dorough, and J.H. Thorstenson: Nature and fate of insecticide residues inhaled by rats in cigarette smoke; Drug Metabol. Dispos. 3 (1975) 513–519. 21A05. Benezet, H.J.: Chemical control of pests in stored tobacco; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 15 (1989) 1–25. 21A05a. Biswas, K., I. Chattopadhyay, R.K. Banerjee, and U. Bandyopadhyay: Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica); Current Sci. 82 (2002) 1336–1345. 21A06. Blanc M., P. Kaelin, and F. Gadani: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) for the control of insect pests in stored tobacco: A review; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 15–22. 21A07. Busbey, R.L. and N.E. McIndoo: A bibliography of nicotine, Part I. Chemistry of nicotine; Division of Insecticide Investigations and Division of Control Investigations; USDA (1936). 21A08. Busbey, R.L. and N. E. McIndoo: A bibliography of nicotine; Part I. Chemistry of nicotine; Division of Insecticide Investigations and Division of Control Investigations; USDA (1936). 21A09. Cai, J., B. Liu, X. Zhu, and Q. Su: Determination of pyrethroid residues in tobacco and cigarette smoke by capillary gas chromatography; J. Chromatog. A 964 (2002) 205–211. 21A10. Carugno, D.N.: Search and determination of decomposition products of zinc ethylene bis(dithiocarbamate) in tobacco smoke; Il Tabacco 65 (1961) 238–244. 21A11. Chamberlin, F.S. and A.H. Madden: Progress report on dusts containing rotenone for the control of flea beetles attacking shade-grown cigar-wrapper tobaccos; The Florida Entomologist 20 (1937) 25–29. 21A12. Clark, T., E. Kaußmann, E. Römerand, and G. Schepers: The fate of Imidacloprid in tobacco smoke of cigarettes made from Imidacloprid-treated tobacco; Pest. Sci. 52 (1998) 119–125.
1465
21A13. Comer, S.W., A.L. Robbins, and D.C. Staiff: Potential exposure from smoking parathion-contaminated cigarettes; Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 6 (1977) 103–110. 21A14. Corbett, J.R.: The biochemical mode of action of pesticides; Academic Press, New York, NY (1974). 21A14a. Cousins, L.T.V.: A review of herbicides and suckercides used in flue-cured tobacco production; 1989 Report to Tobacco Research Board of Zimbabwe, Bates numbers 511118383/8407, see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ ooh53d00. 21A15. Crombie, L.: Chemistry of pyrethrins; Chapter 8 in: Pyrethrum flowers: Production, chemistry, toxicology and uses, edited by J.E. Casida and G.B. Quistad, Oxford University Press (1995). 21A16. Danehower, D.A.: The role of natural products in tobacco-microbial interactions; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 15 (1989) 117–181. 21A17. Davis, D.L., W.O Atkinson, and W. Dorough: Residues of maleic hydrazide in burley tobacco; Proceedings of the 5th Workshop Conference (1979) pp. 124–140, The Tobacco and Health Research Institute, University of Kentucky. 21A18. Dickes, G.J., P.V. Nicholas, and R.J. Greenslade: Organo-chlorine pesticide residues in tobacco products; J. Assoc. Publ. Analysts 9 (1971) 108–111. 21A19. Eberhardt, H-J.: The transfer of pesticide residues into tobacco smoke: A review of the published literature; Report to CORESTA Sub-group on pesticide residues, 44th Meeting, Hamburg, Germany, May 18, 2005, Verband der Cigarettenindustrie, Berlin, Germany. 21A20. Elliott, M.: Properties and applications of pyrethroids; Environ. Hlth. Perspect. 14 (1976) 3–13. 21A21. Environmental Protection Agency: Pesticides Homepage: About pesticides; see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/about/index.htm (2006). 21A22. Farm Chemicals Handbook, 70th ed., edited by R.T. Meister, G.L. Berg, C. Sine, S. Meister, and J. Poplyk, Meister Publishing Co., Willoughby, OH (1984). 21A23. Godin, P.J., R.J. Sleeman, M. Snarey, and E.M. Thain: The jasmolins, new insecticidally active constituents of Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium VIS; J. Chem. Soc. (C) E. (1966) 332–334. 21A24. Guthrie, F.E.: Pending legislative restrictions on the use of agricultural chemicals on tobacco; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 195–202. 21A25. Guthrie, F.E. and T.G. Bowery: Pesticide residues on tobacco; Res. Rev. 19 (1967) 31–56. 21A26. Haeberer, A.F. and O.T. Chortyk: Gas-liquid chromatographic determination of maleic hydrazide in tobacco and tobacco smoke; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 62 (1979) 171–175. 21A27. Hobbie, L. and M. Estelle: Genetic approaches to auxin action; Plant Cell Environ. 17 (1994) 525–540. 21A28. Hobbie, L., C. Timpte, and M. Estelle: Molecular genetics of auxin and cytokinin; Plant Mol. Biol. 26 (1994) 1499–1519. 21A29. Jackson, D.M., R.F. Severson, and A.W. Johnson: Effects of natural tobacco constituents on insect survival, development, and behavior; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 15 (1989) 26–116. 21A30. Kuć, J.: Regulation of insect and pathogen activity in tobacco and tobacco products: Overview and prospects for the future; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 15 (1989) 245–252.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1465
11/24/08 2:40:10 PM
1466
21A31. Ladisch, H.: Über das Vorkommen chlororganischer Insektizide in Tabak und Tabakrauch [Concerning the occurrence of chlorinated organic insecticides in tobacco and tobacco smoke]; Z. Ges. Hyg. (1973) 579–581. 21A32. LaForge F.B. and W.F. Barthel: Constituents of pyrethrum flowers. XVI. Heterogeneous nature of pyrethrolone; J. Org. Chem. 9 (1944) 242–249. 21A33. LaForge, F.B. and H.L. Haller: Constituents of pyrethrum flowers. V. Concerning the structure of pyrethrolone; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58 (1936) 1061. 21A34. LaForge, F.B. and H.L. Haller: Constituents of pyrethrum flowers. VI. The structure of pyrethrolone; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58 (1936) 1777–1780. 21A35. Lomax, T.L., G.K. Muday, and P.H. Rubery: Auxin transport; in; Plant hormones and their role in plant growth development, 2nd ed., edited by P.J. Davies, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1995) 509–530. 21A36. Lorenz, W., M. Bahadir, and F. Korte: Thermolysis of pesticide residues during tobacco smoking; Chemosphere 16 (1987) 521–522. 21A37. Lorenz, W., M. Bahadir, F. Korte, and F. Drawert: Pestizide im Tabakrauch. I. Methode zur Bestimmung des Übergangs von Pestiziden und deren Pyrolyseprodukten in Haupt- und Nebenstromrauch [Pesticides in tobacco smoke. I. Method for the determination of pesticide residues and their pyrolysis products in main- and sidestream smoke]; Chemosphere 12 (1983) 263–269. 21A38. Lorenz, W., M. Bahadir., F. Korte, and F. Drawert: Pestizide im Tabakrauch. II. Pyrolyseverhalten von ausgewählten Pestiziden beim Tabakrauchen [Pesticides in tobacco smoke. II. Pyrolytic behavior of selected pesticides during tobacco smoking]; Chemosphere 12 (1983) 271–275. 21A39. McIndoo, N.E.: Insecticidal uses of nicotine and tobacco. Bureau Entomol. Plant Quarantine E-597, USDA (1943). 21A40. McIndoo, N.E. R.C. Roark, and R.L. Busbey: A bibliography of nicotine, Part II, Section 1: The insecticidal uses of nicotine and tobacco; USDA (1936). 21A41. McIndoo, N.E. R.C. Roark, and R.L. Busbey: A bibliography of nicotine, Part II, Section 2: The insecticidal uses of nicotine and tobacco; USDA (1936). 21A42. McIndoo, N.E. R.C. Roark, and R.L. Busbey: A bibliography of nicotine, Part II, Section 3: The insecticidal uses of nicotine and tobacco; USDA (1936). 21A43. Mestres, R., S. Illes, C. Espinoza, and C. Chevalier: Recherche et dosage de résidus de pesticides dans les tabacs [Studies on the level of pesticides residues in tobaccos]; Trav. Soc. Pharm. Montpellier 34 (1974) 255–266. 21A44. Mestres, R., S. Illes, J. Tourte, and M. Campo: Présence d’éthylène thiourée dans la fumée de tabac renfermant des résidus d’éthylène bis dithiocarbamates [Presence of ethylene thiourea in the smoke from tobacco containing residues of ethylenebisdithiocarbamates]; Trav. Soc. Pharm. Montpellier 40 (1980) 9–14. 21A45. Meyer, S.A., T.J. Sheets, and H. Seltmann: Maleic hydrazide residues in tobacco and their toxicological implications; Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 98 (1987) 43–60. 21A46. Miller, G.T. Jr: Living in the environment, 12th ed., Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. (2002). 21A47. Moshy, R.J. and H.M. Halter: N-Trichloromethylthiotetrahydrophthalimide: Evaluation as an antimycotic
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
21A48.
21A49.
21A50.
21A51.
21A52.
21A53.
21A54.
21A55.
21A56.
21A57.
21A58.
21A59.
21A60.
agent for reconstituted tobacco; CORESTA-Presentation, Stockholm, Sweden, September 16–20, 1968. Mussalo-Rauhamaa, H., S.S. Salmela, A. Leppänen, and H. Pyysalo: Cigarettes as a source of trace and heavy metals and pesticides in man; Arch. Environ. Hlth. 41 (1986) 49–55. Negherbon, W.O.: Handbook of toxicology, Volume III: Insecticides, A compendium; Division of Biology and Agriculture, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA (1959). Nowell, L.H. and E.A. Resek: National standards and guidelines for pesticides in water, sediment, and aquatic organisms: Application to water-quality assessments; Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 140 (1994) 1–164. Philip Morris: Internet document No. 2023562028/2043: Determination of ethylenethiourea (ETU) in mainstream smoke; http://ltdlimages.library.ucsf.edu/imagesy/y/ a/w/yaw71f00/Syaw71f00.pdf#search=%22ethylenethiourea%20smoke%22, 1991. Schmid, K. and A. Rastetter: Gaschromatographische Bestimmung von Insektizid-Rückständen an getrockneten und fermentierten Tabakproben aus Feld- und vegetationsversuchen [Gas chromatographic determination of insecticide residues in dried and fermented tobacco samples of field trials and vegetation studies]; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 5 (1970) 201–206. Sitaramaiah, S., G. Ramaprasad, P.S.N. Murthy, and S.N. Rao: Residues of diflubenzuron: An insect growth regulator in FCV tobacco; Tob. Res. 17 (1991) 101–106. Staudinger, H. and L. Ruzicka: Insektentötende Stoffe. I-VI und VIII-X [Insecticidal material. I-VI and VIII-X]; Helv. Chim. Acta 7 (1924) 177-259, 377–390, 406–458. Steppuhn, A., K. Gase, B. Krock, R. Halitschke, and I.T. Baldwin: Nicotine’s defensive function in nature; PLoS Biol. 2004 August; 2(8): e217, see http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=509292. Stone, G.M.: The fate of maleic hydrazide in a burning cigarette, unpublished report, May 1957; Results presented in Harke et al.: Pyrolyse von Maleinsäurehydrazid und Hydrazin [Pyrolysis of maleic hydrazide and hydrazine]; Z. Lebensm. Unters.-Forsch. 153 (1973) 163–169. Thurm, V.: Untersuchungen über Pestizidrückstände auf Tabakwaren. 3. Mitt. Zum Übergang von DDT und Dieldrin aus Tabakwaren in den Rauch [Investigations over pesticide residues on tobacco products. 3. Transfer of DDT and Dieldrin from tobacco products into the smoke]; Die Nahrung 21 (1977) 335–338. Underwood, J.G.: The radiochemical analysis of phosphine residues in fumigated tobaccos; Tob. Sci. 16 (1972) 123–126. United States General Accounting Office (GAO): Pesticides on tobacco: Federal activities to assess risks and monitor residues (GAO-03–485, April, 2003), see http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03–485. Werner, S.L., M.R. Burkhardt, and S.N. DeRusseau: Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: Determination of pesticides in water by Carbopak-B solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96–216, Denver, CO (1996) 42.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1466
11/24/08 2:40:10 PM
1467
Bibliography
21A61. Wilson, B.W., M. Hooper, E. Chow, R.J. Higgins and J.B. Knaak: Antidotes and neuropathic potential of isofenphos; Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 33 (1984) 386–394. 21A62. Yamazaki, Y. and K. Tomaru: Analytical method for captan residues in tobacco leaves and smoke condensate; Sci. Papers, Cent. Res. Inst., Japan Monopoly Corp. 118 (1976) 24. 21A63. Zaugg, S.D., M.W. Sandstrom, S.G. Smith, and K.M. Fehlberg: Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: Determination of pesticides in water by C-18 solid-phase extraction and capillary-column gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95–181, Denver, CO (1995) 49. 22A01. Acquaah, G.: Principles of plant genetics and breeding; Blackwell Science Ltd, Osney Mead, Oxford (2006) 1–584. 22A02. Benson D.A., I. Karsch-Mizrachi, D.J. Lipman, J. Ostell, and D.L. Wheeler: GenBank; Nucleic Acids Res. 35 (2007) 21–25. 22A03. Bernardi, G.: Structural and evolutionary genomics: Natural selection in genome evolution; (New Comprehensive Biochemistry, Volume 37); Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005) 1–458. 22A04. Boller, T., J.-N. Neuhaus, and J. Ryals: Signal sequences for vacuolar sorting; U.S. Patent 6,054,637, April 25, 2000. 22A05. Britannica: Genetics, genes, genome; http://www.britannica.com. 22A06. Carlson, P.S., H.H. Smith, and R.D. Dearing: Parasexual interspecific plant hybridization; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69 (1972) 2292–2294. 22A07. Chatterjee, S.P., B.K. Singh, and C. Gilvarg: Biosynthesis of lysine in plants: The putative role of meso-diaminopimelate dehydrogenase; Plant Mol. Bio. 26 (1994) 285–290. 22A08. Coates, S., F. Dorlhac de Borne, J. Ross, J.-L. Verrier, L. Jones, E. Julio, A. Luciani, and R. Delon: A comprehensive survey of the N. tabacum transcriptome (The European Sequencing of Tobacco Project, ESTobacco). 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 5, 2006, pp. 19–20. 22A09. Dorlhac de Borne, F., S. Coates and E. Julio: A clean tobacco, is the dream coming true?; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 33 (2007) 15–25. 22A10. GenBank: GenBank Overview; September 14, 2007, see, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank For references see, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ Genbank/index.html, also see reference 1282a. 22A11. Gregory, S.G., K.F. Barlow, K.E. McLay, R. Kaul, D. Swarbreck, A. Dunham, C.E. Scott, K.L. Howe, K. Woodfine, C.C. Spencer, M.C. Jones, C. Gillson, S. Searle, Y. Zhou, F. Kokocinski, L. McDonald, R. Evans, K. Phillips, A. Atkinson, R. Cooper, C. Jones, R.E. Hall, T.D. Andrews, C. Lloyd, R. Ainscough, J.P. Almeida, K.D. Ambrose, F. Anderson, R.W. Andrew, R.I. Ashwell, K. Aubin, A.K. Babbage, C.L. Bagguley, J. Bailey, H. Beasley, G. Bethel, C.P. Bird, S. Bray-Allen, J.Y. Brown, A.J. Brown, D. Buckley, J. Burton, J. Bye, C. Carder, J.C. Chapman, S.Y. Clark, G. Clarke, C. Clee, V. Cobley, R.E. Collier, N. Corby, G.J. Coville, J. Davies, R. Deadman,
22A12.
22A13.
22A14. 22A15.
22A16.
22A17.
22A18.
22A19.
22A20.
22A21.
M. Dunn, M. Earthrowl, A.G. Ellington, H. Errington, A. Frankish, J. Frankland, L. French, P. Garner, J. Garnett, L. Gay, M.R. Ghori, R. Gibson, L.M. Gilby, W. Gillett, R.J. Glithero, D.V. Grafham, C. Griffiths, S. GriffithsJones, R. Grocock, S. Hammond, E.S. Harrison, E. Hart, E. Haugen, P.D. Heath, S. Holmes, K. Holt, P.J. Howden, A.R. Hunt, S.E. Hunt, G. Hunter, J. Isherwood, R. James, C. Johnson, D. Johnson, A. Joy, M. Kay, J.K. Kershaw, M. Kibukawa, A.M. Kimberley, A. King, A.J. Knights, H. Lad, G. Laird, S. Lawlor, D.A. Leongamornlert, D.M. Lloyd, J. Loveland, J. Lovell, M.J. Lush, R. Lyne, S. Martin, M. Mashreghi-Mohammadi, L. Matthews, N.S. Matthews, S. McLaren, S. Milne, S. Mistry, M.J. Moore, T. Nickerson, C.N. O’Dell, K. Oliver, A. Palmeiri, S.A. Palmer, A. Parker, D. Patel, A.V. Pearce, A.I. Peck, S. Pelan, K. Phelps, B.J. Phillimore, R. Plumb, J. Rajan, C. Raymond, G. Rouse, C. Saenphimmachak, H.K. Sehra, E. Sheridan, R. Shownkeen, S. Sims, C.D. Skuce, M. Smith, C. Steward, S. Subramanian, N. Sycamore, A. Tracey, A. Tromans, Z. Van Helmond, M. Wall, J.M. Wallis, S. White, .S.L. Whitehead, J.E. Wilkinson, D.L. Willey, H. Williams, L. Wilming, P.W. Wray, Z. Wu, A. Coulson, M. Vaudin, J.E. Sulston, R. Durbin, T. Hubbard, R. Wooster, I. Dunham, N.P. Carter, G. McVean, M.T. Ross, J. Harrow, M.V. Olson, S. Beck, J. Rogers, D.R. Bentley, R. Banerjee, S.P. Bryant, D.C. Burford, W.D. Burrill, S.M. Clegg, P. Dhami, O. Dovey, L.M. Faulkner, S.M. Gribble, C.F. Langford, R.D. Pandian, K.M. Porter, and E. Prigmore: The DNA sequence and biological annotation of human chromosome 1; Nature 441 (2006) 315–321. Griffiths, A.J.F., J.H. Miller, D.T. Suzuki, R.C. Lewontin, and W.M. Gelbart: An introduction to genetic analysis; W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY (2000). Gunduz, I., H. Sheth, C. Opperman, S. Lommel, and A. Hayes: Analysis of tobacco genome sequences using bioinformatics approaches; Proc. International Solanaceae Conference and Solanaceae Genomics Group, SAT03–4, Abstract No. 375, July 26th, 2006. Hartl, D. and E. Jones: Genetics: Analysis of genes and genomes, 6th ed. Jones and Bartlett, 2005. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (IHGSC): Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome; Nature 431 (2004) 931–945. Kelly, T.J. Jr and H.O. Smith: A restriction enzyme from Hemophilus influenzae. II. J. Mol. Biol. 51 (1970) 393–409. King, R.C., W.D. Stansfield, and P.K. Mulligan: A dictionary of genetics, 7th ed., Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2006). Kornberg, A., I. Lieberman, and E.S. Simms: Enzymatic synthesis of purine nucleotides; J. Biol. Chem. 215 (1955) 417–427. Nicholson, J. and R. Lewis: Biodiversity in the U.S. Nicotiana Germplasm Collection; Proc. International Solanaceae Conference and Solanaceae Genomics Group, SAT03–5, Abstract No. 378, July 26th, 2006. Opperman, C., S. Lommel, and the Tobacco Genome Initiative Group: The Tobacco Genome Initiative: Gene discovery, data mining, and implications to plant biology; Recent Adv. Tob. Sci. 33 (2007) 5–14. Opperman, C., S. Lommel, M. Burke, J. Bedell, and A. Budiman: The tobacco genome initiative: Gene discovery and data mining in Nicotiana tabacum; Proc.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1467
11/24/08 2:40:10 PM
1468
22A22.
22A23. 22A24. 22A25.
22A26.
22A27.
22A28.
22A29.
22A30. 22A31.
22A32. 22A33.
22A34. 22A35.
22A36.
23A01.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
International Solanaceae Conference and Solanaceae Genomics Group, SAT03–1, Abstract No. 256 July 26th, 2006. Opperman, C.H., S.A. Lommel, B. Sosinski, M. Burke, N. Lakey, L. He, R. Brierley, A. Salstead, F. Gadani, and A. Hayes: The tobacco genome initiative; Plant & Animal Genomes XI Conference, Poster 32, Poster session on Genome Sequencing & ESTs, January 11–15, San Diego, CA, 2003. Pearson, H.: Genetics: What is a gene? Nature 441 (2006) 398–401. Pennisi, E.: DNA study forces rethink of what it means to be a gene; Science 316 (2007) 1556–1557. Reichmann, M.E.: The satellite tobacco necrosis virus: A single protein and its genetic code; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 52 (1964) 1009–1117. Ross, J., F. Dorlhac de Borne, S. Coates, J.-L. Verrier, L. Jones, E. Julio, and R. Delon: A comprehensive survey of the N. tabacum transcriptome (The European Sequencing of Tobacco Project, ESTobacco); Proc. International Solanaceae Conference and Solanaceae Genomics Group, SAT03–2, Abstract No. 130, July 26, 2006. Shikanai, T., C.H. Foyer, H. Dulieu, M.A.J. Parry, and A. Yokota: A point mutation in the gene encoding the Rubisco large subunit interferes with holoenzyme assembly; Plant Mol. Bio. 31 (1996) 399–403. Smith, H.O. and K.W. Wilcox: A restriction enzyme from Hemophilus influenzae. I. Purification and general properties; J. Mol. Biol. 51 (1970) 379–391. Tso, T.C.: Tobacco; in: Encyclopedia of chemical technology, edited by A. Standen, Vol. 20, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY (1969) 504–527. Tso, T.C.: The potential for producing safer cigarette tobacco; Agr. Sci. Rev. 10 (1972) 1–10. Tso, T.C.: Production, phytochemistry and modification of tobacco; in: Minutes of the Smoking and Health Contractors Conference, National Cancer Institute, Savannah, GA, March 11–14, 1979. Weiling, F.: Historical study: Johann Gregor Mendel 1822–1884; Am. J. Med. Genetics 40 (1991) 1–26. Weiss, B. and C.C. Richardson: Enzymatic breakage and joining of deoxyribonucleic acid, I. Repair of single-strand breaks in DNA by an enzyme system from Escherichia coli infected with T4 bacteriophage; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 57 (1967) 1021–1028. Wikipedia: Genetics, genes, genome; http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Genome_project. Whitney, S.M. and T.J. Andrews: Photosynthesis and growth of tobacco with a substituted bacterial Rubisco mirror the properties of the introduced enzyme; Plant Physiol. 133 (2003) 287–294. Woloshuk, C.P., J. S. Meulenhoff, M. Sela-Buurlage, P.J.M. van den Elzen, and B.J.C. Cornelissen: Pathogen-induced proteins with inhibitory activity toward Phytophthora infestans; The Plant Cell 3 (1991) 619–628. Case, P.D., P.J. Branton, R.R. Baker, M. Cashmore, D. Winter, C.C. Greig, P.H. Wan, K. Kalirai, N. Timms, N.D. Warren, J. Sheppard, K. Prasad, and J. McAughey: The effect of cigarette design variables on assays of interest to the tobacco industry: 1) Experimental design and some initial findings on Hoffmann analyte yields; CORESTA Joint Study Group Meeting, Stratford-onAvon, U.K. (2005) Paper No. SSPT 01.
23A02. Case, P.D., D.J. Dittrich, H.L. Kimpton, S. Colburn, and V. Cotte: The role of cigarette paper and other factors that influence Hoffmann analyte yields in sidestream smoke; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 68, 2006, p. 57. 23A03. Case, P.D. and N.D. Warren: Method and system for predicting constituent yields in tobacco smoke using a multivariate regression model; European Patent No. EP 1559054 (May 5, 2004). 23A04. Chang, Y.P., P.X. Chen, F.K. St. Charles, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Influence of tip ventilation on Hoffmann analyte deliveries; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 44, 2003, pp. 45–46. 23A05. Closing Quotes Department: Dietrich Hoffmann: Author of the list; Tobacco Reporter (July 2002) pp. 70–72. 23A06. Department of Health (Canada): Proposed tobacco reporting regulations. Schedule 2. Official methods for the collection of emission data on mainstream smoke; Canada Gazette. Part II. 133 (15) pp. 1781–1784 (July 19, 2000). 23A07. Dimandia, J.-M.D., S.B. Stanfill, and F.C. Glisson: Analysis of Hoffmann list compounds by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 14, 2003, pp. 25–26. 23A08. Ellisor, T.A., J.-Z. Dong, and S.C. Moldoveanu: Variation in the level of Hoffmann analytes for mainstream cigarette smoke when a large volume of air passes through the collection device; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 47, 2003, pp. 47–48. 23A09. Imperial Tobacco Co.: Progress on priorities: Strengthen product stewardship; see www.imperial-tobacco.com/ files/environment/cr2004/index/asp?pageid=33. 23A10. Levine, R.: Hoffmann smoke analytes: Inter-laboratory comparisons on cigarette smoke data; Memorandum to Department of Health (Canada) (May 3, 2001), see http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ube34a00. 23A11. Röper, W., R. Wieczorek, and M. Intorp: “Hoffmann” analytes and cigarette smoke in vitro toxicity revisited: How do the data compare?; CORESTA Congress, Kyoto, Japan (2004). 23A12. Sheppard, J., N.D. Warren, and P.D. Case: The effect of cigarette design variables on assays of interest to the tobacco industry: 2) Prediction of smoke and Hoffmann analytes using two different modeling methods; CORESTA Joint Study Group Meeting, Startford-onAvon, U.K. (2005) Paper No. SSPT 02. 23A13. Streibel, T., C. Mocker, M. Sklorz, T. Adam, S. Mitschke, and R. Zimmermann: Real-time on-line characterization of selected Hoffmann analytes in inhaled and exhaled cigarette smoke (mouthspace) by photo ionisation timeof-flight mass spectrometry; 60th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 60, Paper No. 71, 2006, pp. 58–59. 23A14. Volgger, D., I. Rohregger, V. Unterholzner, and A. Zemann: Influence of cigarette paper properties on the formation of Hoffmann type analytes in smoke; 57th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 57, Paper No. 30, 2003, pp. 36–37.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1468
11/24/08 2:40:11 PM
Bibliography
23A15. Winter, D., M. Coleman, and N.D. Warren: The effect of cigarette design variables on assays of interest to the tobacco industry: 3) Tobacco blend types; CORESTA Joint Study Group Meeting, Stratford-on-Avon, U.K. (2005) Paper No. SSPT 03. 24A01. Baker, R.R. and G. Smith: The effect of flavour ingredients on smoke chemistry; 2002 CORESTA Congress, New Orleans, LA, Paper ST 25. 24A02 Bio-Research Laboratories Ltd. (T. Matula): A comparative study of the mutagenicity of tobacco smoke condensate. Research Report (Project No. 7071): Mutagenicity of cigarette smoke condensates (Cigarette smoke condensates from Camel, Winston, Salem, Now, and Vantage as manufactured, flavorants excluded, casing materials excluded, both flavorants and casing materials excluded); August 30, 1977, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501542614 -2636, 502442746 -2770, 502442711 -2733, 509609667 -9692, 504309130 -9151, 504644752 -4773. 24A03. Gaworski, C.L., M.M. Dozier, J.M. Gerhart, L.H. Brennecke, C. Aranyi, and J.D. Heck: 13-Week inhalation toxicity of menthol cigarette smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 35 (1997) 683–692. 24A04. Gaworski, C.L., M.M. Dozier, J.D. Heck, J.M. Gerhart, N. Rajendran, R.M. David, L.H. Brennecke, and R. Morrisey: Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco: 13-Week inhalation exposures in rats; Inhal. Toxicol. 10 (1998) 357–381. 24A05. Gaworski, C.L., J.D. Heck, M.B. Bennett, and M.L. Wenk: Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco: SENCAR mouse skin painting assays; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 06, 1999, p. 22; Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco: Skin painting bioassay of cigarette smoke condensate in SENCAR mice; Toxicol. 139 (1999) 1–17. 24A06. Heck, J.D., C.L. Gaworski, N. Rajendran, and R.L. Morrisey: Toxicological evaluation of humectants added to cigarette tobacco: 13-Week smoke inhalation study of glycerine and propylene glycol in Fischer 344 rats; Inhal. Toxicol. 14 (2002) 1135–1152; Gaworski, C.L., J.D. Heck, and N. Rajendran: Toxicologic evaluation of glycerine and propylene glycol added to cigarette tobacco: 13-Week inhalation studies in Fischer-344 rats; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 5, 1999, pp. 21–22. 24A07. LaVoie, E.J., S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, and E.L. Wynder: The less harmful cigarette and tobacco smoke flavors; in: A safe cigarette? Banbury Report 3, edited by G.B. Gori and F.G. Bock, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1980) pp. 251–260, see p. 254. 24A08. Life Sciences Research Office: Review of ingredients added to cigarettes. Phase two: Scientific criteria for the evaluation of ingredients added to cigarettes; edited by D.M. Byrd III, K.D. Lewis, P.M. Nixon, and R.S. Feldman, Life Sciences Research Office Bethesda, MD (2004). 24A09. Massey, E.D., K.K. Kalirai, and G. Smith: In vitro genotoxicity of smoke from cigarettes containing tobacco ingredients; 2002 CORESTA Congress, New Orleans, LA, Paper ST 6. 24A10. National Cancer Institute: Bioassays of dl-menthol for possible carcinogenicity; Natl. Cancer Inst. Tech. Rept. Ser. 98 (1979) 1–123.
1469
24A11. Roemer, E., F.J. Tewes, T.J. Meisgen, D.J. Veltel, and E.L. Carmines: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 105–111. 24A12. Vanscheeuwijck, P.M., A. Teredesai, P.M. Terpstra, J. Verbeeck, P. Kuhl, B. Gerstenberg, S. Gebel, and E.L. Carmines: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 4: Subchronic inhalation studies; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 113–131. 25A01. Akimoto, H., A Kawai, H. Nomura, M. Nagao, T. Kawachi, and T. Sugimura: Synthesis of potent mutagens in tryptophan pyrolysates; Chem. Lett. (1977) 1061. 25A02. Appleton, B.S.: Levulinic acid pyrolysis; Memorandum, 1986, March 3, see www.rjrtdocs.com 511373917 -3917. 25A03. Baker, R.R. and G. Smith: The effect of flavour ingredients on smoke chemistry; 2002 CORESTA Congress, New Orleans LA, Paper ST 25. 25A04. Best, F.W.: Kenaf pyrolysis; RDM, 1978, No. 23, July 11, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500607757 -7760. 25A05. Best, F.W.: Pyrolysis of Ecusta kenaf; RDM, 1979, No. 14, February 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509340544 -0546. 25A06. Best, F.W.: Adhesive pyrolysis; RDM, 1979, No. 34, August 23, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500608870 -8875. 25A07. Best, F.W.: PVA adhesive pyrolyses; RDM, 1979, No. 42, November 2, see www.rjrtdocs.com 503259274 -9277. 25A08. Best, F.W.: Pyrolysis of various test papers being considered as cigarette paper substitutes; RDM, 1980, No. 15, April 18, see www.rjrtdocs.com 506234607 -4616. 25A09. Bio-Research Laboratories Ltd. (T. Matula): A comparative study of the mutagenicity of tobacco smoke condensate. Research Report (Project No. 7071): Mutagenicity of cigarette smoke condensates (Cigarette smoke condensates from Camel, Winston, Salem, Now, and Vantage as manufactured, flavorants excluded, casing materials excluded, both flavorants and casing materials excluded); August 30, 1977, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501542614 -2636, 502442746 -2770, 502442711 -2733, 509609667 -9692, 504309130 -9151, 504644752 -4773; http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zty09d00. 25A10. Bischoff, F. and J.J. Rupp: The production of a carcinogenic agent in the degradation of cholesterol to progesterone; Cancer Res. 6 (1946) 403–409. 25A11. Bock, F.G. and G.E. Moore; The significance of mouse skin tests of cigarette smoke condensate; in: Tobacco and health, edited by G. James and T. Rosenthal, Thomas, Springfield, IL (1962) 72–86. 25A12. Chopra, N.M. and N.B. Osborne: Systematic studies on the breakdown of p,p’-DDT in tobacco smokes. II. Anal. Chem. 43 (1971) 849. 25A13. Clough, S.C., J.C. Kang, W.R. Johnson, and T.S. Osdene: Thermal fragmentation of maleic hydrazide; Chem. Ind. (London) (1973) 323–324. 25A14. Coleman, W.M. III, and T.A. Perfetti: The role of amino acids and sugars in the production of volatile materials in microwave heated tobacco dust suspensions; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 17 (1997) 75–95. 25A15. Coleman, W.M. III, T.A. Perfetti, and L.D. Stafford: Amino acids and their role in the production of volatile materials in heat-treated tobacco; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 51, Paper No. 61, 1997, pp. 62–63.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1469
11/24/08 2:40:11 PM
1470
25A16. Collins, W.K., S.N. Hawks Jr, and B.U. Kittrell: Effects of systemics alone and contacts followed by a systemic sucker control agent on some agronomic-economic characteristics of flue-cured tobacco; Tob. Sci. 14 (1970) 86–88. 25A17. Conner, T.R. and L.M. Dominguez: Determination of glutamic acid, aspartic acid, aspartine, and glutamine in selected tobaccos by high-performance liquid chromatography; RDM, 1983, No. 19, April 28, see www. rjrtdocs.com 501661135 -1153. 25A18. Crosby, D.G. and A.J. Vlitoss; Growth substances from Maryland mammoth tobacco: Long chain alcohols; Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 20 (1959) 283–292. 25A19. Cullis, C.F., M.M. Hirschler, R.P. Townsend, and V. Visanuvimol: The pyrolysis of cellulose under conditions of rapid heating; Combustion Flame 49 (1983) 235–248. 25A20. Cullis, C.F., M.M. Hirschler, R.P. Townsend, and V. Visanuvimol: The combustion of cellulose under conditions of rapid heating; Combustion Flame 49 (1983) 249–254. 25A21. Eby, J.: Personal communication to Wynder, Graham, and Croninger, see Reference 43 in Cancer Res. 13: (1953) 855–864. 25A22. Frank, R.L., R.W. Holley, and D.M. Wikholm: 3,2`Nicotyrine. Insecticidal properties of certain azo derivatives; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 64 (1942) 2835–2838. 25A23. Fujimaki, M., S. Kato, and T. Kurata: Pyrolysis of sulfur-containing amino acids; Agr. Biol. Chem. Japan 33 (1969) 1141–1151. 25A24. Gaworski, C.L., M.M. Dozier, J.M. Gerhart, L.H. Brennecke, C. Aranyi, and J.D. Heck: 13-Week inhalation toxicity of menthol cigarette smoke; Food Chem. Toxicol. 35 (1997) 683–692. 25A25. Gaworski, C.L., M.M. Dozier, J.D. Heck, J.M. Gerhart, N. Rajendran, R.M. David, L.H. Brennecke, and R. Morrisey: Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco: 13-Week inhalation exposures in rats; Inhal. Toxicol. 10 (1998) 357–381. 25A26 Gaworski, C.L., J.D. Heck, M.B. Bennett, and M.L. Wenk: Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco - SENCAR mouse skin painting assays; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 06, 1999, p. 22. 25A27. Gaworski, C.L., J.D. Heck, and N. Rajendran: Toxicologic evaluation of glycerine and propylene glycol added to cigarette tobacco: 13-Week inhalation studies in Fischer-344 rats; 53rd Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 53, Paper No. 05, 1999, pp. 21–22; Heck, J.D., C.L. Gaworski, N. Rajendran, and R.L. Morrisey: Toxicological evaluation of humectants added to cigarette tobacco: 13-Week smoke inhalation study of glycerine and propylene glycol in Fischer 344 rats; Inhal. Toxicol. 14 (2002) 1135–1152. 25A28. Halaby, G.A. and I.S. Fagerson: Heat-treated food constituents; Proc. 3rd Internat. Cong. Food Sci. Technol., Washington, DC (1970) 820. 25A29. Halpern, Y., R. Riffer, and A. Broido: Levoglucosenone (1,6-anhydro-3,4-dideoxy-∆3-B-D-pyranosenone). A major product of the acid-catalyzed pyrolysis of cellulose and related carbohydrates; J. Org. Chem. 38 (1973) 204–209.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
25A30. Heyns, K. and M. Klier: Bräunungsreaktion und Fragmentierungen von Kohlenhydraten. IV [Browning reactions and fragmentation of carbohydrates. IV]; Carbohydrate Res. 6 (1968) 436–448. 25A31. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, R.T. Bass, R.H. Newman, and M.K. Chavis: Cigarette smoke formation studies: V. The effects of the cigarette periphery on mainstream smoke formation; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 9 (1977) 126–130. 25A32. Jenkins, R.W. Jr, M.K. Chavis, R.T. Bass, and T.S. Osdene: Cigarette smoke formation studies: Vl. The carbon contribution to total smoke from each individual component in the 1R1-type cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch.10 (1980) 145–148. 25A33. Kato, K., T. Doihara, and F. Sakai: Pyrolysis of cellulose. Part 1. Thermal decomposition products of cellulose; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 40 (1966) 443–448. 25A34. Kato, K. and H. Komorita: Pyrolysis of cellulose. Part 1V. Effect of crystallinity of cellulose on the formation of the volatile compounds; Agr. Biol. Chem. 32 (1968) 21–26. 25A35. Kennedy, J.E. and T.F. Riehl: Pyrolysis of tobacco extracts. 22nd Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 22, Paper No. 17, 1968, p.10. 25A36. Kennedy, M.V., B.J. Stojanovic, and F.L. Shuman: Analysis of decomposition products of pesticides; J. Agr. Food Chem. 20 (1972) 341–343. 25A37. Kobashi, T., H. Hoshaku, and M. Watanabe: Pyrolysis of nicotine in an air stream; J. Chem. Soc. Japan 84 (1963) 71–74. 25A38. Kobashi, T., H. Hoshaku, and M. Watanabe: Pyrolysis of nicotine in a nitrogen atmosphere; J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan 37 (1963) 412 25A39. Lam, J.: Demonstration of 3,4-benzpyrene, other aromatic hydrocarbons and nitrogen in the products formed by pyrolysis of tobacco extract; Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 40 (1957) 369–372. 25A40. Latimer, P.H.; A preliminary investigation of the pyrolysis-gas chromatography of polymers, tobaccos, and starch derivatives; RDR, 1966, No. 18, May 9, see www. rjrtdocs.com 500967170 -7211. 25A41. Lien, Y.-C.: Thermal decomposition of some amino acids and their interaction with single triglycerides; Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, 1972. 25A42. Lipska, A.E. and G.E. McCasland: The synergistic effect of benzhydrylation and iodination of the flammability of A-cellulose; J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 15 (1971) 419–435. 25A43. Massey, E.D., K.K. Kalirai, and G. Smith: In vitro genotoxicity of smoke from cigarettes containing tobacco ingredients; 2002 CORESTA Congress, New Orleans LA, Paper ST 6. 25A44. Merritt, C. Jr and D.H. Robertson: The analysis of proteins, peptides and amino acids by pyrolysis: Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry; J. Gas Chrom. 5 (1967) 96–98. 25A45. Negishi C, Wakabayashi K, Tsudo M, Sato S, Sugimura T, Saito H, Maeda M, and Jägerstad M (1984), Formation of 2-amino-3,7,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline, a new mutagen, by heating a mixture of creatinine, glucose, and glycine; Mutation Res. 140 (1984) 55–59. 25A46. Oakley, E.T., M.B. Bennett, and J.C. Holmes: A material balance study of a burning cigarette. II. Distribution of the humectant during the smoking process using 14Cglycerol as a tracer; 51st Tobacco Chemists’ Research
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1470
11/24/08 2:40:11 PM
Bibliography
25A47.
25A48.
25A49.
25A50.
25A51.
25A52.
25A53.
25A54.
25A55.
25A56.
25A57.
25A58.
25A59.
25A60.
25A61.
25A62.
Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 14, Paper No. 61, 1960, pp. 62–63. Perfetti, T.A.: Conformational analysis of nicotine salts; RDM, 1980, No. 25, July 24, see www.rjrtdocs.com 500617910 -7929; 35th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 35, Paper No. 26, 1981, p. 13, for presentation text, see www.rjrtdocs.com 509063113 -3140. Rodgman, A.: The carcinogenicity of foodstuffs; Memorandum (November 19, 1954) pp. 1–35, see www. rjrtdocs.com 506333770 -3804, http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu/tid/trn74d00; Foodstuffs—Carcinogenicity studies; Memorandum (September, 1955) pp. 1–29, see www.rjrtdocs.com 501541976 -2004, http://legacy. library.ucsf.edu/tid/byr39d00. Roemer, E., F.J. Tewes, T.J. Meisgen, D.J. Veltel, and E.L. Carmines: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 105–111. Roffo, A.H.: Desarrollo de un carcinome en el conejo por el tabaco [Development of a carcinoma in a rabbit by tobacco]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cancer 7 (1930) 501–538. Roffo, A.H.: El tabaco en el cancer de vejiga [Tobacco and cancer of the bladder]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cancer 8 (1931) 277–324. Roffo, A.H.: Carcinome développé chez un lapin après trois ans, par l’effet du tabac [Carcinoma developed from the effect of tobacco in a rabbit after three years]; Neoplasmes 2 (1932) 77–88. Roffo, A.H.: Maligne Tumoren des Verdauungstrakte nach Fütterung mit hitzeoxydierten Fette [Malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract produced by ingestion of fats oxidized by heat]; Bull. Assoc. Franc. Étude Cancer 28 (1938) 556; Prensa Med. Argent 26 (1938) 619–648. Roffo, A.H.: The formation of ulcers and malignant growths in the alimentary tract after administration of food with irradiated cholesterol; Z. Krebsforsch. 47 (1938) 473–497. Roffo, A.H.: Malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract produced by ingestion of fats oxidized by heat; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cancer 15 (1939) 407–521. Roffo, A.H.: Cancer-producing action of a phenanthrene derivative from cholesterol; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cancer 15 (1939) 837–845. Roffo, A.H.: The carcinogenic action of a phenanthrene derivative obtained from cholesterol; Z. Krebsforsch. 49 (1939) 341–347. Roffo, A.H.: Pirolisis de colesterol. Alquitran cancerigene del cholesterol [Pyrolysis of cholesterol. Carcinogenic tar from cholesterol]; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cancer 18 (1941) 929–943. Roffo, A.H.: Experimental gastric cancer from ingestion of oxidized fats; Bol. Inst. Med. Exp. Estud. Cancer 19 (1942) 503–530. Roffo, A.H.: Unidad cancerigena de los alquitranes de diversos tipos de tabacos [Carcinogenicity of the tars from different tobacco types]; Rev. Liqa Puertorriq. Contra el Cancer (1943) 122–124. Rudenko, A.P. and I.Y. Konsinska: Transformation of propionic acid and diethyl ketone on silica gel; J. Org. Chem. USSR 5 (1969) 80–684. Sakuma, H., S. Munakata, and S. Sugawara: Pyrolysis of chlorogenic acid and rutin; Agr. Biol. Chem. 46 (1982) 1311–1317.
1471
25A63. Senneca, O., S. Ciaravolo, and A. Nunziata: Composition of the gaseous products of pyrolysis of tobacco under inert and oxidative conditions; J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 79 (2007) 234–243. 25A64. Shafizadeh, F.: Pyrolysis and combustion of cellulosic materials. Adv. Carbohydrate Chem. 23 (1968) 419–474. 25A65. Shulman, G.P. and P.G. Simmonds: Thermal decomposition of aromatic and heteroaromatic amino acids; Chem. Com. (1968) 1040–1042. 25A66. Simmonds, P.G., E.E. Medley, M.A. Ratcliff Jr, and G.P. Shulman: Thermal decomposition of aliphatic monoamino-monocarboxylic acids; Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 2060–2066. 25A67. Smith, W.T. Jr and J.M. Patterson; Pyrolysis of amino acids; Proceedings, University of Kentucky Tobacco and Health Workshop (1969) 38. 25A68. Staudinger, H., R. Endle, and J. Herold: Über die pyrogene Zersetzung von Butadien-Kohlenwasserstoffen [Pyrogenic decomposition of butadiene hydrocarbons]; Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 46 (1913) 2466–2477. 25A69. Steiner, P.E., R. Steele, and F.C. Koch: The possible carcinogenicity of overcooked meats, heated cholesterol, and heated sesame oil; Cancer Res. 3 (1943) 100–107. 25A70. Stotesbury, S., H. Digard, L. Willoughby, and A. Couch: The pyrolysis of tobacco additives as a means of predicting their behaviour in a burning cigarette; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 18 (1999) 147–163. 25A71. Stotesbury, S., L. Willoughby, and A. Couch: Pyrolysis of cigarette ingredients labelled with stable isotopes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 19 (2000) 55–64. 25A72. Swain, A.P. and R.L. Stedman: Analytical studies on the higher fatty acids of tobacco; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 45 (1962) 536–540. 25A73. Takeda, K., T. Ohta, K. Shudo, T. Okamoto, K. Tsuji, and T. Kosuge: Synthesis of a mutagenic principle isolated from tryptophan pyrolysate; Chem. Pharm. Bull. 256 (1978) 2145. 25A74. Thornton, R.E. and C. Valentine: Determination of the balance of carbon-14 activity added to cigarettes; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 4 (1968) 287–292. 25A75. Tomasik, P.: The thermal decomposition of carbohydrates. Part 1. The decomposition of mono-, di-, and oligo-saccharides; Adv. Carbohydrate Chem. Biochem. 47 (1989) 203–278. 25A76. Townsend, D.E.: Influence of delivery level on the strength of perception of “dry” cigarettes; R&DM, 1982, No. 15, April 22, see www.rjrtdocs.com 508856194 -6213. 25A77. Tsuchiya, Y, and K. Sumi: Thermal decomposition products of cellulose; J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 14 (1970) 2003–2013. 25A78. Van Order, R.B. and H.G. Linwall: Indole; Chem. Rev. 30 (1962) 69–96. 25A79 Vanscheeuwijck, P.M., A. Teredesai, P.M. Terpstra, J. Verbeeck, P. Kuhl, B. Gerstenberg, S. Gebel, and E.L. Carmines: Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 4: Subchronic inhalation studies; Food Chem. Toxicol. 40 (2002) 113–131. 25A80. Vlitos, A.J. and D.G. Crosby: Isolation of fatty acids with plant growth promoting activity from Maryland mammoth tobacco; Nature 184 (1959) 462–463. 25A81. Waller, R.E.: The benzpyrene content of town air; Brit. J. Cancer 5 (1952) 8–21.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1471
11/24/08 2:40:11 PM
1472
25A82. Wodley, F.A.: Pyrolysis products of untreated and flame retardant-treated cellulose and levoglucosan; J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 15 (1971) 835–851. 25A83. Wöhler, F.: On the decomposition of urea and uric acid at high temperatures; Ann. Phys. Chem. 15 (1829) 619–630. 25A84. Woodward, C.F., C.O. Badgett, and J.G. Kaufmann: Chemical-catalytic liquid-phase oxidation of nicotine, 3-picoline and quinoline to nicotinic acid; Ind. Eng. Chem. 36 (1944) 544–546. 25A85. Woodward, C.F., C.O. Badgett, and J.J. Willaman: Nicotine to nicotinonitrile: Catalytic vapor-phase oxidation; Ind. Eng. Chem. 36 (1944) 540–544. 25A86. Yasukawa, K., M. Takido, T. Matsumoto, M. Takeuchi, and S. Nagakawa: Sterol and triterpene derivatives from plants inhibit the effects of tumor promoters and sitosterol and betulic acid inhibit tumor formation in mouse skin two-stage carcinogenesis; Oncology 48 (1991) 72–76. 25A87. Yongkuan, C. and H. Wangyun: Pyrolysis of glycyrrhizic acid and its sodium salts; Tob. Sci. 39 (1995) 49–54. 26A01. Alldrick, A.J., R.C. Cottrell, I.R. Rowland, and S.D. Gangolli: The role of DNA-repair processes in N-nitrosopyrrolidine-induced mutagenesis; Carcinogenesis 6 (1985) 105–108. 26A02. American Association for Cancer Research: Position paper on carcinogens in tobacco smoke (1984), see Loeb, L.A., V.L. Ernster, K.E. Warner, J. Abbotts, and J. Laszlo: Smoking and cancer: An overview; Cancer Research 44 (1984) 5940–5958. 26A03. American Meat Institute: A survey of nitrosamines in sausages and dry-cured meat products; Food Technol. 34 (1980) 45–51. 26A03a. Archer, M.C., S.R. Tannenbaum, T.Y. Fan, and M. Weisman: Reaction of nitrite with ascorbate and its relation to nitrosamine formation; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 54 (1975) 1203–1205. 26A04. Bailey, D., R. Doerr, W. Fiddler, and S. Fairheller: Unhairing method identified as source of N-nitrosodimethylamine in tannery atmosphere; J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 77 (1982) 476–484. 26A05. Bassir, O. and E.N. Maduagwu: Occurrence of nitrate, nitrite, dimethylamine, and dimethylnitrosamine in some fermented Nigerian beverages; J. Agr. Food Chem. 26 (1978) 200–203. 26A06. Berry, D.L., T.J. Slaga, J. DiGiovanni, and M.R. Juchau: Chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polybrominated biphenyls, and polychlorinated biphenyls in a two-stage system of mouse skin tumorigenesis: Potent anticarcinogenic effects; Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 320 (1979) 405–414. 26A07. Chung, F.L., A. Juchatz, J. Vitarius, and S.S. Hecht: Effects of dietary compounds on A-hydroxylation of N-nitrosopyrrolidine and N’-nitrosonornicotine in rat target tissues; Cancer Res. 44 (1984) 2924. 26A08. Chung, F.L., A. Juchatz, J. Vitarius, B. Reiss, and S.S. Hecht: Inhibition of target tissue activation of N’-nitrosonornicotine and N-nitrosopyrrolidine by dietary components; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 797–804. 26A09. Chung, F.L., M.A. Morse, K.I. Eklind, and Y. Xu: Inhibition of tobacco-specific nitrosamine-induced lung
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
26A10.
26A11.
26A12.
26A13.
26A14.
26A15.
26A16.
26A17.
26A18. 26A19.
26A20.
26A21.
26A22.
26A23.
tumorigenesis by compounds derived from cruciferous vegetables and green tea; in: Tobacco smoking and nutrition: Influence of nutrition on tobacco-associated health risks, edited by J.N. Diana and W.A. Pryor, Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 686 (1993) 186–202. Clapp, N.K., N.D. Bowles, L.C. Satterfield, and W.C. Klima: Selected protective effect of butylated hydroxytoluene against 1,2-dimethylhydrazine carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 63 (1979) 1081–1087. Clapp, N.K., R.L. Tyndall, L.C. Satterfield, W.C. Klima, and N.D. Bowles: Selective sex-related modification of diethylnitrosamine-induced carcinogenesis in Balb/C mice by concomitant administration of butylated hydroxytoluene; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 61 (1978) 177–182. Cohen, B.I., R.F. Raicht, and E. Fazzini: Reduction of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced colon tumors in the rat by cholesterol; Cancer Res. 42 (1982) 5050–5052. Cohen, G.M., W.P. Bracken, R.P. Iyer, D.L. Berry, and T.J. Slaga: Anticarcinogenic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on benzo[a]pyrene and 7,12dimethylbenz[a]anthracene tumor initiation and its relationship to DNA binding; Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 4027–4033. Cohen, J.B. and J.D. Bachman: in: Environmental aspects of N-nitroso compounds, edited by E.A. Walker, M. Castegnaro, L. Griciute, and R.E. Lyle, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 19 (1978) 357–372. Coker, H.A., A.E. Thomas, and A. Akintonwa: Determination of the total level of nitrosamines in select consumer products in the Lagor area of Nigeria. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 47 (1991) 706–710. Coker, H.A., A.E. Thomas, A. Akintonwa, and M.O. Odusote: Determination of the total level of nitrosamines in select consumer products in the major metropolitan regions of Nigeria; Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 44 (1991) 203–207. Crabtree, H.G.: Influence of bromobenzene on the induction of skin tumors by 3,4-benzopyrene; Cancer Res. 4 (1944) 688–693; Influence of unsaturated dibasic acids on the induction of skin tumors by chemical carcinogens; Cancer Res. 5 (1945) 346–351. Craddock, V.M.: Nitrosamines, food and cancer: Assessment; Food Chem. Toxicol. 28 (1990) 63–66. Crosby, N.T., J.K. Foreman, J.F. Palframan, and P. Sawyer: Estimation of steam-volatile N-nitrosamines in foods at the 1 µg/kg level; Nature 238 (1972) 342–343. Cross, C.K. and K.D. Bharucha: A simple screening method for determination of volatile nitrosamines in fried bacon rasher and cook-out fat; J. Agr. Food Chem. 27 (1979) 1358–1360. Danish Institute of Protein Chemistry: Investigations on formation and occurrence of volatile N-nitrosamines in Danish cheese, see Pedersen, E., J. Thomsen, and H. Werner: Investigations on formation and occurrence of volatile nitrosamines in Danish cheese; IARC Sci Publ. 1980 (31):493–501. Dennis, M., G. Cripps, A.R. Tricker, R. Massey, and D. McWeeny: N-Nitroso compounds and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Icelandic smoke-cured mutton; Food Chem. Toxicol. 22 (1984) 305–306. DiGiovanni, J., D.L. Berry, G.L. Gleason, G.S. Kishore, and T.J. Slaga: Time-dependent inhibition by 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin of skin tumorigenesis
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1472
11/24/08 2:40:12 PM
Bibliography
26A24.
26A25.
26A26.
26A27.
26A28.
26A29.
26A30.
26A31.
26A32.
26A33.
26A34.
26A35.
26A36.
with polycyclic hydrocarbons; Cancer Res. 40 (1980) 1580–1587. Ducos, P. and R. Gaudin: Occupational exposure to volatile nitrosamines in the rubber industry in France; CAH Notes Doc. 123 (1986) 145–150. Dunn, B.P. and H.F. Stich: Determination of free and protein-bound N-nitrosoproline in nitrite-cured meat products; Food Chem. Toxicol. 22 (1984) 609–614. Eisenbrand, G.: N-Nitrosoverbindungen in Nahrung und Umwelt [N-Nitroso compounds in food and the environment]; Wiss. Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, Germany (1981). Eisenbrand, G., M. Archer, K.D. Brunnemann, D.H. Fine, S.S. Hecht, D. Hoffmann, J. Krull, and K.S. Webb: Problems of contamination and artefact formation in nitrosamine sampling and analysis; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H.R. Egan, R. Preussmann G. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 25–34. Eisenstark, A., R. Eisenstark, and R. Van Sickle: Mutation of Salmonella typhimurium by nitrosoguanidine; Mutation Res. 2 (1965) 1–10. Elgersma, R.H.C., R.P. Sen, R.W. Stephany, P.L. Schuller, K.S. Webb, and T.A. Gough: A collaborative examination of some Dutch cheeses for the presence of volatile nitrosamines; Neth. Milk Dairy J. 32 (1978) 125–142. Ellen, G.: Exposure to preformed N-nitroso compounds; Drug Dev. Eval. 16 (1990) 119–46; Ellen, G., E. Egmond, and E.T. Sahertian: N-Nitrosamines and residual nitrite in cured meats from the Dutch market; Z Lebensm. Forschung A 182 (1986) 14–18. Fan, T.Y., V. Goff, L. Song, D.H. FineH, G.P. Arsenault, and K. Biemann: N-Nitrosodiethanolamine in cosmetics, lotions and shampoos; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 15 (1977) 423–430. Farinati, F., Z. Zhou, J. Bellah, C.S. Liebers, and A.J. Garro: Effect of chronic ethanol consumption on activation of nitrosopyrrolidine to a mutagen by rat upper alimentary tract, lung and hepatic tissue; Drug Metab. Dispos. 13 (1985) 210–214. Fazio, T., D.C. Havery, and J.W. Howard: in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence and biological effects, edited by H. Bartsch, I.K. O’Neill, M. Castegnaro. and M. Okada, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982). Fiala, E. S., G. Bobotas., C. Kulakis., L.W. Wattenberg, and J.H. Weisburger: The effect of disulfiram and related compounds on the in vivo metabolism of the colon carcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine; Biochem. Pharmacol. 26 (1977) 1763–1768. Fiddler, W., J.W. Pensabene, R.C. Doerr, and A.E. Wasserman: Formation of N-nitrosodimethylamine from naturally occurring quaternary ammonium compounds and tertiary amines; Nature 236 (1972) 307. Fine, D.H.: HPLC-TEA determination of NDELA and similar compounds in cosmetics; in: Environmental carcinogens. Selected methods of analysis. Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, G. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, I.K. O’Neill, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 309–317.
1473
26A37. Fine, D.H., D.P. Rounbehler, E. Sawicki, and K. Krost: Determination of dimethylnitrosamine in air and water by thermal energy analysis: Validation of analytical procedures; Environ. Sci. Technol. 11 (1977) 577–580. 26A38. Fine, D.H., D.P. Rounbehler, A. Rounbehler, A. Silvergleid, E. Sawicki, K. Krost, and G.A. de Marais: Determination of dimethylnitrosamine in air, water and soil by thermal energy analysis; Environ. Sci. Technol. 11 (1977) 581–584. 26A39. Fong, Y.Y. and W.C. Chan: Dimethylamine in Chinese marine salt fish; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 11 (1973) 841–845. 26A40. Fong, Y.Y. and W.C. Chan: Methods for limiting the content of. dimethylnitrosamine in Chinese marine salted fish; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 14 (1976) 95–98. 26A41. Goff, E.V. and D.H. Fine: Analysis of volatile N-nitrosamines in alcohol beverages; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 17 (1979) 569–573. 26A42. Goodhead, K., T.A. Gough, K.S. Webb, J. Stadhouders, and R.H.C. Elgersma: The use of nitrate in the manufacture of Gouda cheese. Lack of evidence of nitrosamine formation; Neth. Milk Dairy 30 (1976) 207–221. 26A43. Gough, T.A.: A search for nitrosamines in East African spirit; Gut 18 (1977) 301–302. 26A44. Gough, T.A., M.G. McPhail, K.S. Webb, B.J. Wood, and R.F. Coleman: An examination of some foodstuffs for the presence of volatile nitrosamines; J. Sci. Food Agr. 28 (1977) 345–351. 26A45 Gough, T.A., K.S. Webb, and R.F. Coleman: Estimate of the volatile nitrosamine content of UK food; Nature 272 (1978) 161–163. 26A46. Gray, J.I.: in: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by R.A. Scanlan and S.R. Tannenbaum, Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Series No. 174, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1982). 26A47. Gray, J.I. and C.J. Randall: The nitrite/nitrosamine problem in meats: An update; J. Food Prot. 42 (1979) 168–179. 26A48. Hamburg, A. and A. Hamburg: Formation of N-nitrosoproline in some meat products during technological treatment; Tr. Tallin Politekh Inst. 537 (1982) 57–63. 26A49. Hamburg, A. and J. Kann: Method for determining N-nitrososarcosine (NSAR) and its content in food products; Tr. Tallin Politekh Inst. 537 (1982) 43–55. 26A50. Hansen, T., W. Iwaoka, L. Green, and S.R. Tannenbaum: Analysis of N-nitrosoproline in raw bacon. Further evidence that nitrosoproline is not a major precursor of N-nitrosopyrrolidine; J. Agr. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 1423–1426. 26A51. Havery, D.C. and T. Fazio: Survey of finfish and shellfish for volatile N-nitrosamines; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 60 (1977) 517–519. 26A52. Havery, D.C. and T. Fazio: Estimation of volatile N-nitrosamines in rubber nipples for babies’ bottles; Food Chem. Toxicol. 20 (1982) 934–939. 26A53. Havery, D.C., T. Fazio, and J.W. Howard: Trends in levels of N-nitrosopyrrolidine in fried bacon; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 61 (1978) 1379–1382. 26A54. Havery, D.C., J.H. Hotchkiss, and T. Fazio: Nitrosamines in malt and malt beverages; J. Food Sci. 46 (1981) 501–505. 26A55. Havery, D.C., D.A. Kline, E.M. Miletta, F.L. Joe, and T. Fazio: Survey of food products for volatile nitrosamines; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 59 (1976) 540–546.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1473
11/24/08 2:40:12 PM
1474
26A56. Hecht, S.S.: N-Nitrosamines in cosmetics; Drug Cosmetic 128 (1981) 36–37. 26A57. Hedler, L. and P. Marquardt: Occurrence of diethylnitrosamine in some samples of food; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 6 (1968) 341. 26A58. Helgason, T., S. Ewen, B. Jaffray, J. Stowers, J. Outram, and J. Pollock: N-Nitrosamines in smoked meats and their relation to diabetes; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relationship to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 911–920. 26A59. Hoffmann, D. and E.L. Wynder: A study of air pollution carcinogens. II. The isolation and identification of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from gasoline engine exhaust condensate; Cancer 15 (1962) 93–102. 26A60. Holcomb, L.C.: Indoor air quality and environmental tobacco smoke: Concentration and exposure; Environ. Internat. 19 (1993) 9–40. 26A61. Homburger, F., A. Treger, and E. Boger: Inhibition of murine subcutaneous and intravenous benzopentaphene carcinogenesis by sweet orange oils and D-limonene; Oncology 25 (1971) 1–10. 26A62. Hotchkiss, J.H., D.C. Havery, and T. Fazio: Rapid method for estimation of N-nitrosodimethylamine in malt beverages; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 64 (1981) 929–932. 26A63. Huang, D.P., J.H.C. Ho, K.S. Webb, B.J. Wood, and T.A. Gough: Volatile nitrosamines in salt-preserved fish before and after cooking; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 19 (1981) 167–172. 26A64. Iyengar, J.R., T. Panalaks, W.F. Miles, and N.P. Sen: A survey of fish products for volatile N-nitrosamines; J. Sci. Food 27 (1976) 527–530. 26A65. Janzowski, C., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Occurrence of N-nitrosamino acids in cured meat products and their effect on formation of N-nitrosamines during heating; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 16 (1978) 343–348. 26A66. Jasinski, J.S.: Liquid chromatographic determination of nitrosamines in malt and beer with a photoconductivity detector; Anal. Chem. 56 (1984) 2214–2218. 26A67. Josefsson, E. and S. Nygren: Volatile N-nitroso compounds in foods in Sweden; Var Föda 33 (Suppl. 2) (1981) 147–165. 26A68. Kallistratos, G.: Verhinderung der 3,4-Benzopyrenkanzerogenese durch natürliche und synthetische Verbindungenen [Inhibition of 3,4-benzopyrene carcinogenesis by natural and synthetic compounds]; Münch. Med. Wochenschr. 117 (1975) 391–394. 26A69. Kallistratos, G. and E. Fasske: Biologische inactivierung kanzerogener Stoffe [Biological inactivation of carcinogenic substances]; Folia Biochem. Biol. Graeca 13 (1976) 94–107. 26A70. Kann, J., O. Tauts, R. Kalve, and P. Bogovski: in: IARC, N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence and biological effects, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982) 319–326. 26A71. Kawabata, T., H. Ohshima, J. Uibu, M. Nakamura, M. Matsui, and M. Hamano: in: Naturally occurring carcinogens/mutagens and modulators of carcinogenesis, University Park, MD (1979) 195–209. 26A72. Kimoto, W.I., C.J. Dooley, J. Carre, and W. Fiddler: Role of strong ion exchange resins in nitrosamine formation in water; Water Res. 14 (1980) 869–876; Nitrosamines
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
26A73.
26A74.
26A75.
26A76.
26A77.
26A78.
26A79.
26A80.
26A81.
26A82.
26A83.
26A84.
26A85.
in tap water after concentration by a carbonaceous absorbent; Water Res. 15 (1981) 1099–1106. Klein, D., A.M. Girad, J. DeSmedt, Y. Fellion, and G. Derby: Analyse de la nitrosodiethanolamine dans les produits de l’industrie cosmetique [Analysis of nitrosodiethanolamine in the products of the cosmetic industry]; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 19 (1981) 233–235. Klein, M.: Inhibition of skin tumorigenesis in Strain B6AF1/J female mice with maleic anhydride; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 34 (1965) 175–183. Klus, H., H. Begutter, M. Ball, and M. Intorp, Environmental tobacco smoke in real life situations; in: Indoor Air ’87, Vol. 2. Environmental tobacco smoke, multicomponent studies, radon, sick buildings, odours and irritants, hyperreactivities and allergies, edited by B. Seifert, H. Esdorn, M. Fisher, H. Rüden, and J. Wegner, Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene, Berlin Germany (1987) 137–141; Environmental tobacco smoke in real life situations; Poster Handout, 4th Internat. Conf. Indoor Air Qual. Climate, Berlin, Germany (1987). Kotin, P. and H.L. Falk: Atmospheric factors in pathogenesis of lung cancer; Adv. Cancer Res. 7 (1953) 475–514. Krull, I.S., T.Y. Fan, and D.H. Fine: Problem of artifacts in the analysis of N-nitroso compounds; Anal. Chem. 50 (1978) 698–701. Lakritz, L. and J.W. Pensabene: Survey of fluid and nonfat dry milk for N-nitrosamines; J. Dairy Sci. 64 (1981) 371–374. Lam, L.K.T., R.P. Pai, and L.W. Wattenberg: Synthesis and chemical carcinogen inhibitory action of 2-tertbutyl-4-hydroxyanisole; J. Med. Chem. 22 (1979) 569–571. Later D.W., M.L. Lee, K.D. Bartle, R.C. Kong, and D.L. Vassilaros: Chemical class separation and characterization of organic compounds in synthetic fuels; Anal. Chem. 53 (1981) 1612–1620. Leuchtenberger, C, R. Leuchtenberger, and P.F. Doolin: A correlated histological, cytological, and cytochemical study of the tracheobronchial tree and lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke. I. Bronchitis with atypical epithelial changes in mice exposed to cigarette smoke; Cancer 11 (1958) 490–506. Leuchtenberger, C, R. Leuchtenberger, W. Zebrun, and P. Shaffer: A correlated histological, cytological, and cytochemical study of the tracheobronchial tree and lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke. II. Varying response of major bronchi to cigarette smoke. Absence of bronchogenic cancer after prolonged exposure and disappearance of bronchial lesions after cessation of exposure; Cancer 13 (1960) 721–732. Leuchtenberger, C, R. Leuchtenberger, W. Zebrun, and P. Shaffer: A correlated histological, cytological, and cytochemical study of the tracheobronchial tree and lungs of mice exposed to cigarette smoke. III. Unaltered incidence of grossly visible adenomatous lung tumors in female cf1 mice after prolonged exposure to cigarette smoke; Cancer 13 (1960) 956–958. Libbey, L.M., R.A. Scanlan, and J.F. Barbour: N-Nitrosodimethylamine in dried dairy products; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 18 (1980) 459–461. Lijinsky, W.: Occupational and environmental exposures to N-nitroso compounds; Adv. Mod. Environ. Toxicol. 17 (1990) 189–207.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1474
11/24/08 2:40:12 PM
Bibliography
26A86. Liu, L. and A. Castonguay: Inhibition of the metabolism and genotoxicity of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in rat hepatocytes by (+)-catechin; Carcinogenesis 12 (1991) 1203–1208. 26A87. Lo, L.W. and H.F. Stich: The use of short-term tests to measure the preventive action of reducing agents on formation and activation of carcinogenic nitroso compounds; Mutation Res. 57 (1978) 57–67. 26A88. Maduagwu, E.N. and O. Bassir: Detection of dimethyland diethylnitrosamine in a Nigerian fermented milk product (nono); Toxicol. Lett. 4 (1979) 169–173. 26A89. Magee, P.N.: Summary and closing remarks; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by L.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1983) 985–988. 26A90. Maki, T., Y. Tamura, Y. Shimamura, M. Koseki, S. Nishigaki, and Y. Naoi: Occurrence of dimethylnitrosamine in commercial beers and its formation in the brewing process; Tokyo-Toritsu Eisei Kenyusho Kenkyo 30 (1979) 145–148. 26A91. Maki, T., Y. Tamura, Y. Shimamura, M. Koseki, S. Nishigaki, and Y. Naoi: Occurrence of dimethylnitrosamine in commercial beers and its formation in the brewing process; Shokukuhn Eiseigaku Zasshi 21 (1980) 184–188. 26A92. Maki, T., Y. Tamura, Y. Shimamura, and Y. Naoi: Estimated volatile nitrosamines in Japanese food; Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25 (1980) 257–261. 26A93. Mangino, M.M., R.A. Scanlan, and T. O’Brien: in: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by R.A. Scanlan and S.R. Tannenbaum, Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Series No. 174, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1982) 229–245. 26A94. Massey, R.C., P.E. Key, R.A. Jones, and G.L. Logan: Volatile, nonvolatile and total N-nitroso compounds in bacon; Food Add. Contam. 8 (1991) 585–598. 26A95. Matsui, M. and K. Kaya: N-Nitroso compounds in the environment; Kankyo Kagaku 2 (1992) 1–17. 26A96. Matsui, T., H. Ohshima, and T. Kawabata: Increase in the nitrosamine content of several fish products upon broiling; Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 46 (1980) 587–590. 26A97. Matsumoto, M., R. Oyashu, M.L. Hopp, and T. Kitajima: Suppression of dibutylnitrosamine-induced bladder cancer carcinomas in hamsters; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58 (1977) 1825–1829. 26A98. McAughey, J.J., D.A. Knight, A. Black, and C.J. Dickens: Environmental tobacco smoke retention in humans from measurements of exhaled smoke composition; Inhal. Toxicol. 6 (1993) 615–631. 26A99. Mejstrik, V., L. Drzkova, Z. Sagner, M. Matrka, and F. Krampera: Occurrence and properties of N-nitroso compounds; Chem. Listy 81 (1987) 357–362. 26A100. Mergens, W.J., J.J. Kamm, H.L. Newmark, W. Fiddler, and J. Pensabene: A-Tocopherol: Uses in preventing nitrosamine formation; in: Environmental aspects of N-nitroso compounds, edited by Walker, E.A., L. Griciute, M. Castegnaro, and R.E. Lyle, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 19 (1978) 199–212. 26A101. Mirvish, S.S.: Kinetics of dimethylamine nitrosation in relation to nitrosamine carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 44 (1970) 633–639. 26A102. Mirvish, S.S.: Formation of N-nitroso compounds: Chemistry, kinetics and in vivo occurrence; Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 31 (1975) 325–351.
1475
26A103. Mirvish, S.S.: Ascorbic acid inhibition of N-nitroso compound formation in chemical, food and biological systems; in: Inhibition of tumor induction and development, edited by M.S. Zedeck and M. Lipkin, Plenum Publishing, New York, NY (1981) 101–126. 26A104. Mirvish, S.S.: Inhibition of the formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds by ascorbic acid and other compounds; in: Cancer achievements, challenges and prospects for the 1980’s, edited by J.H. Burchenal and H.F. Oettgen, Plenum Publishing, New York, NY (1981) 557–588. 26A105. Mirvish, S.S.: Effect of vitamin C and E on N-nitroso compound formation, carcinogenesis and cancer; Cancer (Oct. 15 Suppl., 1986) 1842–1850. 26A106. Mirvish, S.S.: The significance for human health of nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds; NATO ASI Series, Series G (Nitrate Contam.) (1991) 253–266. 26A107. Mirvish, S.S., O. Bulay, R.G. Runge, and K. Patil: Study of the carcinogenicity of large doses of dimethylnitramine, N-nitroso-l-proline and sodium nitrite administered in drinking water to rats; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 64 (1980) 1435–1442. 26A108. Mirvish, S.S., P. Issenberg, and J.P. Sams: N-Nitrosomorpholine synthesis in rodents exposed to nitrogen dioxide and morpholine; in: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by R.A. Scanlan and S.R. Tannenbaum, Am. Chem. Soc. Ser. No. 174 (1982) 181–191. 26A109. Mirvish, S.S. and L. Kaufman: A study of nitrosamines and S-carboxyl derivatives of cysteine as lung carcinogens in adult SWR mice; Int. J. Cancer 6 (1970) 69–73. 26A110. Mirvish, S.S., J. Sams, and S.S. Hecht: Kinetics of nornicotine and anabasine nitrosation in relation to N’-nitrosonornicotine occurrence in tobacco and tobacco-induced cancer; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 59 (1977) 1211–1213. 26A111. Mirvish, S.S. and P. Shubik: Ascorbic acid and nitrosamine; Nature 250 (1974) 684. 26A112. Mirvish, S.S., L. Wallcave, M. Eagen, and P. Shubik: Ascorbate-nitrate reaction: Possible means of blocking the formation of carcinogenic N-nitroso compounds; Science 177 (1972) 65–68. 26A112a. Mitch, W.A., J.O. Sharp, R.R. Trussell, R.L. Valentine, L. Alvarez-Cohen, and D,L, Sedlak: N-Nitrosodimethylamines (NDMA) as a drinking water contaminant: A review; Environ. Eng. Sci. 20 (2003) 389–404. 26A113. Motohashi, N., K. Kamata, and R. Meyer: Chromatographic techniques used to determine benz[c]acridines in environmental samples; J. Chromatog. 643 (1993) 1–10. 26A114. Mumford, J.L., D.B. Harris, and K. Williams: Indoor air sampling and mutagenicity studies from unvented coal combustion; Environ. Sci. Tech. 21 (1987) 308–311. 26A115. Murphy, S.E. and R. Heilbrun: Effect of nicotine and tobacco-specific nitrosamines on the metabolism of N’-nitrosonornicotine and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3pyridyl)-1-butanone by rat oral tissue; Carcinogenesis 11 (1990) 1663–1666. 26A116. Newmark, H. and W. Mergens: Alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) and its relationship to tumor induction; in: Inhibition of tumor induction and development, edited by M. S. Dedeck and M. Lipkin, Plenum Publishing, New York, NY (1981) 127–168. 26A117. Nieper, L. and V. Etzel: Nitrate content in smoked fish muscle; Arch. Lebensmittelhyg. 34 (1983) 149.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1475
11/24/08 2:40:12 PM
1476
26A118. Nitrite Safety Council: A survey of nitrosamines in sausages and dry-cured meat products; Food Technol. 34 (1980) 45–51, 53, 103, 127. 26A119. Nomura, T.: Comparative inhibiting effects of methylxanthines on urethane-induced tumors, malformations, and presumed somatic mutations in mice; Cancer Res. 43 (1983) 1342–1346. 26A120. Okieimen, F., E. Akintola, T. Anucha, and M. Ajibola: Determination of the total level of nitrosamine contamination of some consumer products in Nigeria; Intl. J. Env. Anal. Chem. 21 (1985) 261–266. 26A121. Panalaks, T., J.R. Iyengar, B.A. Donaldson, W.F. Miles, and N.P. Sen: Further survey of cured meat products for volatile N-nitrosamines; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 57 (1974) 806–812. 26A122. Panalaks, T., J.R. Iyengar, and N.P. Sen: Nitrate, nitrite and N-nitrosodimethylamine in cured meat products; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 56 (1973) 621–625. 26A123. Pedersen, E. and I. Meyland: Nitrate, nitrite, and volatile nitrosamines in pickled fish prepared by addition of nitrate; Z. Lebensm. Unterforsch. 173 (1981) 359–361. 26A124. Pensabene, J.W., J.I. Feinberg, E.G. Piotrowski, and W. Fiddler: Occurrence and determination of N-nitrosoproline and N-nitrosopyrrolidine in cured meat products; J. Food Sci. 44 (1979) 1700–1702. 26A125. Pensabene, J.W., A.J. Miller, E.L. Greenfield, and W. Fiddler: Rapid dry column method for determination of N-nitrosopyrrolidine in fried bacon; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 65 (1982) 151–156. 26A126. Perchellet, J.-P. and R.K. Boutwell: Effects of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and cyclic nucleotides on the biochemical processes linked to skin tumor promotion by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; Cancer Res. 41 (1981) 3927–3935. 26A127. Peto, R. and R. Doll: The control of lung cancer; New Scientist 105 (1440) (1985) 26–30. 26A128. Pollock, J.R.A.: Aspects of nitrosation in malts and beer: I. Examination of malts for the presence of N-nitrosoproline, N-nitrososarcosine; J. Inst. Brewing 87 (1981) 356–359. 26A129. Preussmann, R., D. Daiber, and H. Hengy: A sensitive colour reaction for nitrosamines on thin-layer chromatograms; Nature 201 (1964) 502–503; Preussmann, R., G. Neurath, G. Wulf-Lorentzen, D. Daiber, and H. Hengy: Anfärbemethoden und Dünnshicht-Chromatographie von organischen N-Nitrosoverbindungen [A colorimetric method and thin-layer chromatography of organic N-nitroso compounds]; Z. Anal. Chem. 202 (1964) 187–192. 26A130. Preussmann, R., B. Spiegelhalder, and G. Eisenbrand: in: Carcinogenesis: Fundamental mechanisms and environmental effects, Reidel Publishing Co., The Netherlands (1980) 273–285. 26A131. Preussmann, R., B. Spiegelhalder, and G. Eisenbrand: Reduction of human exposure to environmental N-nitroso compounds; in: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by R.A. Scanlan and S.R. Tannenbaum, Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Series No. 174, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1982) 217–228. 26A132. Puppala, D., C.G. Gairola, and H.I. Swanson: Identification of kaempferol as an inhibitor of cigarette smoke-induced activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and cell transformation; Carcinogenesis 28 (2007) 639–647.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
26A133. Ramel, C., U.K. Alekperov, B.N. Ames, T. Kada, and L.W. Wattenberg: Inhibitors of mutagenesis and their relevance to carcinogenesis; Report by ICPEMC Expert Group on Antimutagens and Desmutagens; Mutation Res. 168 (1986) 47–65. 26A134. Röper, H.: Chemie und Bilding von N-Nitrosoverbindungen [Chemistry and formation of nitroso compounds]; in: Das Nitrosamin-Problem [The nitrosamine problem], edited by R. Preussmann, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim (1983) 189–211. 26A135. Röper, H., K. Heyns, and W. Guenther: Nitrosamin: Spurenanalysen von Anchosen und Raucherfischen [Nitrosamine: Trace analyses of anchovies and smoked fish]; Mikrobiol. Technol. Lebensmitt. 7 (1981) 13–17. 26A136. Rosin, M. P.: Inhibition of genotoxic activities of complex mixtures by naturally occurring agents; Carc. Mutagen Environ. 1 (1982) 259–273. 26A137. Ross, R.D., J. Morrison, D.P. Rounbehler, S. Fan, and D.H. Fine: N-Nitroso compound impurities in herbicide formulations; J. Agr. Food Chem. 25 (1977) 1416–1418. 26A138. Scanlan, R.A. and J.F. Barbour: N-Nitrosodimethylamine content of U.S. and Canadian beers; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco smoke, and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 242–243. 26A139. Scanlan, R.A., J.F. Barbour, J.W. Hotchkiss, and L.M. Libbey: N-Nitrosodimethylamine in beer; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 18 (1980) 27–29. 26A140. Schoenhard, G.L., W.W. Aksamit, R.K. Bible, L.C. Hansen, J.D. Hribar, E.F. Levon, M.P. Shubeck, and H. Wagner: in: Environmental aspects of N-nitroso compounds, edited by E.A. Walker, M. Castegnaro, L. Griciute, and R.E. Lyle, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 19 (1978) 78–85. 26A141. Schüller, H.M., A. Castonguay, M. Orloff, and G. Rossignol: Modulation of the uptake and metabolism of 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone by nicotine; Cancer Res. 51 (1991) 2009–2114. 26A142. Sebranek, J.G. and R.G. Cassens: Nitrosamines: A review; J. Milk Food Technol. 36 (1973) 76–91. 26A142a. Sen, N.P.: The evidence for the presence of N-nitrosodimethylamine in meat products. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 10 (1972) 219. 26A143. Sen, N.P.: Recent studies in Canada on the occurrence and formation of N-nitroso compounds in foods and food contact materials. in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco smoke, and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 232–234. 26A144. Sen, N.P. and C. Dalpe: A simple thin-layer chromatographic technique for the semi-quantitative determination of volatile nitrosamines in alcoholic beverages; Analyst 97 (1972) 216. 26A145. Sen, N.P., B. Donaldson, S. Seaman, B. Collins, and J.R. Iyengar: Recent nitrosamine analyses in cooked bacon; Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 10 (1977) A13-A15. 26A146. Sen, N.P. and S. Seaman: Gas-liquid chromatographic-thermal energy analyzer determination of N-nitrosodimethylamine in beer at low parts per billion level; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 64 (1981) 933–938. 26A147. Sen, N.P. and S. Seaman: Volatile N-nitrosamines in dried foods; J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 64 (1981) 1238–1242.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1476
11/24/08 2:40:12 PM
Bibliography
26A148. Sen, N.P. and S. Seaman: On-line combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and total N-nitroso determination apparatus for the determination of N-nitrosamides and other N-nitroso compounds and some recent data on the levels of N-nitrosoproline in foods and beverages; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 137–143. 26A149. Sen, N.P., S. Seaman, Clarkson, F. Garrod, and P. LaLonde: Volatile N-nitrosamines in baby bottle rubber nipples and pacifiers. Analysis, occurrence and migration; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer, edited by I.K. O’Neill, R.C. von Borstel, C.T. Miller, J. Long, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 57 (1984) 51–57. 26A150 Sen, N.P., S. Seaman, and S. Kushwaha: Prevention of artifactual formation of nitrosamines during the analysis of baby bottle rubber nipples; Analyst 111 (1986) 139–144. 26A151. Sen, N.P., S. Seaman, and M. McPherson: Nitrosamines in alcoholic beverages; J. Food Safety 2 (1980) 13–18. 26A152. Sen, N.P., S. Seaman, and M. McPherson: Further studies on the occurrence of volatile and nonvolatile nitrosamines in foods; in: N-Nitroso compounds: Analysis, formation and occurrence, edited by E.A. Walker, L. Griciute, M. Castegnaro, and M. Börszsönyi, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 31 (1980) 457–465. 26A153. Sen, N.P., S. Seaman, and W.F. Miles: Volatile N-nitrosamines in various cured meat products: Effect of cooking and recent trends; J. Agr. Food Chem. 27 (1979) 1354–1360. 26A154. Sen, N.P., D.C. Smith, and L. Schwinghamer: Formation of N-nitrosamines from secondary amines and nitrite in human and animal gastric juice; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 3 (1969) 66–69. 26A155. Sen, N.P., D.C. Smith, L. Schwinghamer, and B. Howsam: Formation of nitrosamines in nitrite-treated fish; Canadian Inst. Food Technol. 3 (1970) 66–69. 26A156. Sen, N.P., I. Tessier, and S. Seaman: Determination of N-nitrosoproline and N-nitrososarcosine in malt and beer; J. Agr. Food Chem. 31 (1983) 1033–1036. 26A157 Shamberger, R.J.: Relationship of selenium to cancer. I. Inhibitory effect of selenium on carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 44 (1970) 931–936. 26A158 Shamberger, R.J.: Inhibitory effect of vitamin A on carcinogenesis; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 47 (1971) 667–673. 26A159. Skrabs, R.: Workplace studies in the leather industry; Health Aspects; Leder 35 (1984) 171–174. 26A160. Slack, P.T. and T. Wainwright: Hordenine as the precursor of NDMA in malt; J. Inst. Brew. 87 (1981) 259–263. 26A161. Solenova, L.G., L.V. Krishosheeva, G.A. Smirnov, and A.Y. Khesina: N-Nitrosamines in the air of industries producing rubber shoes and industrial rubber goods; Gig. Tr. Prof. Zabol. (1990) (6): 23–25. 26A162. Spiegelhalder, B.: Analysis of malt and malt based beverages: General aspects; in: Environmental carcinogenesis: Selected methods of analysis, Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, I.K. O’Neill, G. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 45 (1983) 103–113.
1477
26A163. Spiegelhalder, B.: Carcinogens in the workroom air in the rubber industry; Scand. J. Work Env. Hlth. 9 (Suppl. 2) (1983) 15–26. 26A164. Spiegelhalder, B. and G. Eisenbrand: in: N-Nitroso Compounds: Occurrence and biologic effects, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC, Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982) 231–243. 26A165. Spiegelhalder, B., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Influence of dietary nitrate on nitrite content of human saliva: Possible relevance to in vivo formation of N-nitroso compounds; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 14 (1974) 545–548. 26A166. Spiegelhalder, B., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Contamination of beer with trace quantities of N-nitrosodimethylamine; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 17 (1979) 29–31. 26A167 Spiegelhalder, B., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Volatile nitrosamines in food; Oncology 37 (1980) 211–216. 26A168. Spiegelhalder, B., G. Eisenbrand, and R. Preussmann: Volatile N-nitrosamines in beer and other beverages by direct extraction using a kieselguhr column; in: Environmental carcinogenesis: Selected methods of analysis, Vol. 6: N-Nitroso compounds, edited by H. Egan, R. Preussmann, I.K. O’Neill, G. Eisenbrand, B. Spiegelhalder, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. 45 (1983) 135–142. 26A169. Spiegelhalder, B. and R. Preussmann: Contamination of toiletries and cosmetic products with volatile and nonvolatile N-nitroso carcinogens; J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 108 (1984) 160–163. 26A170. Stephany, R.W. and P.L. Schüller: Daily dietary intakes of nitrite, nitrate and volatile nitrosamines in the Netherlands using the duplicate sampling technique; Oncology 37 (1980) 203–210. 26A171. Takeda, K., S. Ukawa, and M. Mochizuki: Inhibition by fatty acids of direct mutagenicity of N-nitroso compounds; in: Relevance to human cancer of N-nitroso compounds, tobacco and mycotoxins, edited by I.K. O’Neill, J. Chen, and H. Bartsch, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 105 (1991) 558–563. 26A172. Teel, R. and A. Castonguay: Antimutagenic effects of polyphenolic compounds; Cancer Lett. 66 (1992) 107–113. 26A173. Theiler, R., K. Sato, T. Aspelund, and A. Miller: Inhibition of N-nitrosamine formation in a cured ground pork belly model system; J. Food Sci. 49 (1984) 341–344. 26A174. Thompson, H.C. Jr, S.M. Billedeau, B.J. Miller, E.B. Hansen Jr, J.P. Freeman, and M.L. Wind: Determination of N-nitrosamines and N-nitrosamine precursors in rubber nipples from baby pacifiers by gas chromatography thermal energy analysis; J. Toxicol. Env. Hlth. 13 (1984) 615–632. 26A175. Thompson, H.J.: Effect of deficiencies of selenium and vitamin E alone or in combination on the induction of mammary carcinogenesis by 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea; Carcinogenesis 12 (1991) 2175–2179. 26A176. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Dimethylnitrosamines in malt beverages: Availability of guide; Fed. Reg. 45 (1980) 39341–39342. 26A177. Vecchio, A.J. and J.H. Hotchkiss: N-Nitrosamine ingestion from consumer-cooked bacon; J. Food Sci. 51 (1986) 754. 26A178. Waddell, W. and C. Marlowe: Inhibition by alcohols of the localization of radioactive nitrosonornicotine in sites of tumor formation; Science 221 (1983) 51–52.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1477
11/24/08 2:40:13 PM
1478
26A179. Walker, E.A., M. Castegnaro, L. Garren, G. Toussaint, and B. Kowalski: Intake of volatile nitrosamines from consumption of alcohols; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 63 (1979) 947–951. 26A180. Warshawsky, D., W. Barkley, and E. Bingham: Factors affecting carcinogenic potential of mixtures; Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 20 (1993) 376–382. 26A181. Wasserman, A.E., W. Fiddler, R.C. Doerr, S.F. Osman, and C.J. Dooley: Dimethylnitrosamine in frankfurters; Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 10 (1972) 681–684. 26A182. Wattenberg, L.W.: Inhibition of carcinogenic and toxic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbons by phenolic antioxidants and ethoxyquin; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 48 (1972) 1425–1430. 26A183. Wattenberg, L.W.: Inhibition of dimethylhydrazine-induced neoplasia of the large intestine by disulfiram; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 54 (1975) 1005–1006. 26A184. Wattenberg, L.W.: Inhibition of carcinogenic effects of polycyclic hydrocarbons by benzyl isothiocyanate and related compounds; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58 (1977) 395–398. 26A185. Wattenberg, L.W.: Inhibition of carcinogen-induced neoplasia by sodium cyanate, tert-butyl isocyanate, and benzyl isothiocyanate subsequent to carcinogen exposure; Cancer Res. 41 (1981) 2991–2994. 26A186. Wattenberg, L. W.: Chemoprevention of cancer; Cancer Res. 45 (1985) 1–8. 26A187. Wattenberg, L.W. and J.B. Coccia: Inhibition of 4-methylnitrosamino-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone carcinogenesis in mice by D-limonene and citrus fruit oils; Carcinogenesis 12 (1991) 115–117. 26A188. Wattenberg, L.W. and E.S. Fiala: Inhibition of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced neoplasia of the large intestine in female CF1 mice by carbon disulfide; J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60 (1978) 1515–1517. 26A189. Wattenberg, L.W., L.K.T. Lam, and A.V. Fladmoe: Inhibition of chemical carcinogen-induced neoplasia by coumarins and A-angelica lactone; Cancer Res. 39 (1979) 1651–1654. 26A190. Wattenberg, L.W. and W.D. Loub: Inhibition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced neoplasia by naturally occurring indoles; Cancer Res. 38 (1978) 1410–1412. 26A191. Webb, K.S. and T.A. Gough: Human exposure to preformed environmental N-nitroso compounds in the UK; Oncology 37 (1980) 195–198. 26A192. Williams, D., F.J. Wiebel, J.C. Leutz, and H.V. Gelboin: Effect of polycyclic hydrocarbons in vitro on aryl hydrocarbon (benzo[a]pyrene) hydroxylase; Biochem. Pharmacol. 20 (1971) 2130. 26A193. Wolf, D.: N-Nitrosamines at workplaces; Staub. Reinhalt Luft 49 (1989) 183–186. 26A194. Wolf, D., H. Blome, and A. Schuetz: Problems in the measurement and estimation of carcinogenic working materials of Group I in industrial workplace atmospheres exemplified by N-nitrosamines; Staub. Reinhalt Luft 44: (1984) 33–37. 26A195. Wolff, I.A. and A.E. Wasserman: Nitrates, nitrites, and nitrosamines; Science 177 (1972) 15–19. 26A196. Yasukawa, K., M. Takido, T. Matsumoto, M. Takeuchi, and S. Nakagawa: Sterol and triterpene derivatives from plants inhibit the effects of a tumor promoter and sitosterol and betulic acid inhibit tumor formation in mouse skin twostage carcinogenesis; Oncology 48 (1991) 72–76.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
26A197. Zerban, H., R. Preussmann, and P. Bannasch: Dosetime relationship of the development of preneoplastic liver lesions induced in rats with low doses of N-nitrosodiethanolamine; Carcinogenesis 9 (1988) 607–610. 26A198. Zweig, G., S. Selim, R. Hummel, A. Mitelman, D.P. Wright, C. Law, and E. Regezman: in: N-Nitroso compounds: Occurrence and biologic effects, edited by H. Bartsch, I.K. O’Neill, M. Castegnaro, and M. Okada, IARC, Lyon, France, IARC Sci. Publ. No. 41 (1982) 554–564. 27A01 Anonymous: Smog Formation Review; internet site (2006) http://www.naftc.wvu.edu/technical/other/Smog/ smog.html 27A02. Apel, K. and H. Hirt: Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction; Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 55 (2004) 373–399. 27A03. Bacic, G. and M. Mojovic: EPR spin trapping of oxygen radicals in plants: A methodological overview; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1048 (2005) 230–243. 27A04. Baker, R.R.: Free radicals in tobacco smoke; Report October 22, 1985, British American Tobacco Company document, see http://bat.library.ucsf.edu 100508434 -100508438. 27A05. Bartalis, J., W.G. Chan, and J.B. Wooten: A new look at radicals in cigarette smoke; Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 5103–5106. 27A06. Bartosz, G.: Oxidative stress in plants; Acta Physiol. Plant 19 (1997) 47–64. 27A07. Baskin, S.I. and H. Salem: Oxidants, antioxidants and free radicals, Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, 1997. 27A08. Baum, S.L., I.G.M. Anderson, R.R. Baker, D.M. Murphy, and C.C. Rowlands: Electron spin resonance and spin trap investigation of free radicals in cigarette smoke: Development of a quantification procedure; Anal. Chim. Acta 481 (2003) 1–13. 27A09. Bielski, B.H.J. and J.M. Gebicki: Atlas of electron spin resonance spectra; Academic Press, New York (1967). 27A10. Blakley, R.L., D.D. Henry, L.S. Winkler, and M.F. Borgerding: Studies of mainstream smoke vapor phase radical formation mechanisms; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 59, 1995, p. 45. 27A11. Blakley, R.L., D.D. Henry, and C.J. Smith: Lack of correlation between cigarette mainstream smoke particulate phase radicals and hydroquinone yield; Food Chem. Toxicol. 39 (2001) 401–406. 27A12 Blakley, R.L, G.R. Shelar, J.S. Gentry, G.W. Worrell, and T.A. Perfetti: United States Patent 5,360,023, (November 1, 1994a) Cigarette filter, Assignee: R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Filed June 12, 1992. 27A13. Borgerding, M.F., R.L. Blakley, L.S. Winkler, D.D. Henry, G.J. Bowman, and D.H. Smith: Methodology for the quantitative determination of free radicals in mainstream vapor phase cigarette smoke; 49th Tobacco Chemists’ Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 49, Paper No. 58, 1995, p. 45. 27A14. Brown, R.F.C.: Pyrolytic methods in organic chemistry, Academic Press, New York, Chapters 3–9 (1980). 27A15. Brunmark, A. and E. Cadenas: Redox and addition chemistry of quinoid compounds and its biological implications; Free Radical Biol. Med. 7 (1989) 435–477.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1478
11/24/08 2:40:13 PM
1479
Bibliography
27A16. Butterworth, B.E., J.A. Popp, R.B. Conolly, and T.L. Goldsworthy: Chemically induced cell proliferation in carcinogenesis; in: Mechanisms of carcinogenesis in risk identification, edited by H. Vaino, P.N. Magee, D.B. McGregor, and A.J. McMichael, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France, 1992, pp 279–305. 27A17. Chouchane, S., J.B. Wooten, F.J. Tewes, A. Wittig, B.P. Müller, D. Veltel, and J. Diekmann: Involvement of semiquinone radicals in the in vitro cytotoxicity of cigarette mainstream smoke; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 19 (2006) 1602–1610. 27A18. Chouchane, S., N.K. Meruva, A.P. Brown, and J.B. Wooten: Precursors of the free radicals generated in the tar and gas phases of mainstream cigarette smoke; Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints 50 (2005) 419–420. 27A19. Church, D.F.: Spin trapping organic radicals; Anal. Chem. 66 (1994) 419A–427A. 27A20. Cranton, E.M. and J.P. Frackelton: Scientific rationale for EDTA chelation therapy mechanism of action, in: EDTA Chelation Therapy, Second Edition, edited by E.M. Cranton, Hampton Roads Publishing Company, Charlottesville, VA, 2001. 27A21. Cueto, R. and W.A. Pryor: Cigarette smoke chemistry: Conversion of nitric oxide to nitrogen dioxide and reactions of nitrogen oxides with other smoke components as studied by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy; Vib. Spectroscopy 7 (1994) 97–111. 27A22. Culcasi, M, A. Muller, A. Mercier, J.-L. Clement, O. Payet, A. Rockenbauer, V. Marchand, and S. Pietri: Early specific free radical-related cytotoxicity of gas phase cigarette smoke and its paradoxical temporary inhibition by tar: An electron paramagnetic resonance study with the spin trap DEPMPO; Chemico-Biological Interactions 164 (2006) 215–231. 27A23. Dat, J., S. Vandenabeele, E. Vranová, M. Van Montagu, D. Inzé, and F. Breusegem: Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses; Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 57 (2000) 779–795. 27A24. Davies, K.J. and W.A. Pryor: The evolution of free radical biology and medicine: A 20-year history; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 39 (2005)1263–1264. 27A25. De Hys, L.D., H.E. Francis, G.L. Seebach, and J.R. Wasson: Electron spin resonance spin trapping studies of cigarette smoke; Tob. Health Workshop Conf. Proc. 4 (1973) 474–484. 27A26. Deliconstantinos, G., V. Villiotou, and J. Stavrides: Scavenging effects of hemoglobin and related heme containing compounds on nitric oxide, reactive oxidants and carcinogenic volatile nitroso compounds of cigarette smoke. A new method for protection against the dangerous cigarette constituents; Anticancer Res. 14 (1994) 2717–2726. 27A27. Dellinger, B., S. Lomnicki, L. Khachatryan, Z. Maskos, R.W. Hall, J. Adounkpe, C. McFerrina, and H. Truong: Formation and stabilization of persistent free radicals; Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2007) 521–528. 27A28. Demopoulos, H.B.: Molecular oxygen in health and disease; Read before the American Academy of Medical Preventics, 10th Annual Spring Conference, Los Angeles, California, May 21, 1983. 27A29. Demopoulos, H.B., D.D. Pietronigro, and E.S. Flamm: The possible role of free radical reactions
27A30 27A31.
27A32.
27A33.
27A34.
27A35.
27A36. 27A37.
27A38.
27A39.
27A40.
27A41.
27A42.
27A43.
27A44.
27A45.
27A46.
in carcinogenesis; J. Environ. Path. Tox. 3 (1980) 273–303. Dorn, H.F.: The relationship of cancer of the lung and the use of tobacco; Am. Statistician 12 (1954) 7–13. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) or Electron Spin Resonance (ESR), Definition; Internet site (2004); See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_spin_resonance. Emami I., D. Masselot, P. Vandoolaeghe, S. Le Gac, and C. Rolando: Removal of free radicals in mainstream cigarette smoke by filters including antioxidant rosemary extract: Quantification by a new and robust LC-MS/MS method; CORESTA Meeting Smoke Sci. Prod. Techno Groups, Freiburg, 2003, Abstr. STPOST 09. Emami, I., K. Alexandrov, M. Rojas, and C. Rolando: Evaluation of the risk reduction associated with smoking cigarettes producing less free radicals; see http:// www.lsro.org/presentation_files/rrrvw/cc_2005_04_27/ emami_01.pdf. Emami, I.: Utilisation de composés polyphénoliques ou de leurs derivés comme capteurs de radicaux libres dans les filtres de cigarette [Use of polyphenolic compounds or their derivatives as captors of free radicals in cigarette filters]; Brevet W09933365, August 7, 1999. Estefan, R.M., E.M. Gause, and J.R. Rowlands: Electron spin resonance and optical studies of the interaction between NO2 and unsaturated lipid components; Environ. Res. 3 (1970) 62–87. Fenton, H.J.H.: Oxidation of tartaric acid in presence of iron; J. Chem. Soc. 65 (1894) 899–910. Flicker, T.M. and S.A. Green: Comparison of gas-phase free-radical populations in tobacco smoke and model systems by HPLC; Environ. Health Perspect. 109 (2001) 765–771. Flicker, T.M. and S.A. Green: Detection and separation of gas-phase carbon-centered radicals from cigarette smoke and Diesel exhaust; Anal. Chem. 70 (1998) 2008–2012. Ghosh, M., J. McAughey, and P. Ionita: Electron spin resonance; The 40th Annual International Meeting Electron Spin Resonance of the Royal Society of Chemistry, New College, Oxford, 25–29 March 2007, Poster 82. Halliwell, B.: Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life; Plant Physiol 141 (2006) 312–322. Halliwell, B. and J.M. Gutteridge: Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1999). Halliwell, B.H. and H.E. Poulsen: Oxidative stress, in: Cigarette Smoke and Oxidative Stress, edited by B.H. Halliwell and H.E. Poulsen, Springer, Berlin (2006). Halliwell, B. and M. Whiteman: Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture: How should you do it and what do the results mean?; Brit. J. Pharmacol. 142 (2004) 231–255. Halpern, A. and J. Knieper: Spin trapping of radicals in gas-phase cigarette smoke; Z. Naturforsch. 40 (1985) 850–852. Hancock, J.T., R. Desikan, and S.J. Neill: Role of reactive oxygen species in cell signaling pathways; Biochem. Soc. Transactions 29 (2001) 345–350. Hirata, H. and H. Fujii: Free radicals in living systems: In vivo detection of bioradicals with EPR spectroscopy, in: Current Organic Chemistry, Volume 10, Number 5, edited by Atta-ur-Rahman and Klaus-Peter Zeller, 2006, pp. 521–534.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1479
11/24/08 2:40:13 PM
1480
27A47. Hung, S-H., C.-W. Yu, and C.H. Lin: Hydrogen peroxide function as a stress signal in plants; Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 46 (2005) 1–10. 27A48. Ingebrethsen, B.J. and C.S. Lyman: Particle formation and growth in gases from totally filtered mainstream cigarette smoke; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 267–276. 27A49. Irshad, M. and P.S. Chaudhuri: Oxidant-antioxidant system: Role and significance in human body; Indian J. Exp. Biol. 40 (2002) 1233–1239. 27A50. Janoff, A.: Elastases and emphysema. Current assessment of the protease-antiprotease hypothesis; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 132 (1985) 417– 433. 27A51. Janoff, A., H. Carp, P. Laurent, and L. Raju: The role of oxidative processes in emphysema; Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 127 (1983) 31–38. 27A52. Janzen, E.G.: Electron spin resonance thermal decomposition studies related to materials; U.S. Clearinghouse Fed. Sci. Tech. Inform., No. 720884: AD (1971), Available from: NTIS From: Govt. Rep. Announce. (U.S.) 71(10) (1971) 57–65. 27A53. Janzen, E.G.: Spin trapping; Acct. Chem. Res. 4(1) (1971) 31–40. 27A54. Janzen, E.G. and J.L. Gerlock: Detection of gas phase free radicals by electron spin resonance spin trapping techniques; Nature 222 (1969) 867–868. 27A55. Janzen, E.G., I.G. Lopp, and T.V. Morgan: Detection of fluoroalkyl and acyl radicals in the gas-phase photolysis of ketones and aldehydes by electron spin resonance gas-phase spin trapping techniques; J. Phys. Chem. 77 (1973) 139. 27A56. Johnson, J.D.: Analysis of gas phase smoke radicals via spin trapping and tandem mass spectrometry; 59th Tobacco Science Research Conference, Program Booklet and Abstracts, Vol. 59, Paper No. 39, 2005, p. 44. 27A57. Kalnins, M.A., C. Steelink, and H. Tarkow: Lightinduced free radicals in wood; U.S. Forest Service Research Paper, FPL 58, October 1966, 1–9. 27A58. Khan, N. and H.M. Swartz: Measurements in vivo of parameters pertinent to ROS/RNS using EPR spectroscopy; Mol. Cell. Biochem. 234–235 (2002) 341–357. 27A59. Khan, N., C.M. Wilmot, G.M. Rosen, E. Demidenko, J. Sun, J. Joseph, J. O’Hara, B. Kalyanaraman, and H.M. Swartz: Spin traps: In vitro toxicity and stability of radical adducts; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 34 (2003) 1473–1481. 27A60. Kiyosawa, H., M. Suko, H. Okudaira, K. Murata, T. Miyamoto, M.H. Chung, H. Kasai, S. Nishimura: Cigarette smoking induces formation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, One of the oxidative DNA damages in human peripheral leukocytes; Free Radic. Res. Commun. 11 (1990) 23–27. 27A61. Kleinert, T.N.: Free radical reactions in UV irradiation of cellulose; Holzforschung 18 (1964) 24–28. 27A62. Kodama, M., M. Kaneko, M. Aida, F. Inoue, T. Nakayama, and H. Akimoto: Free radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and its implication in human cancer; Anticancer Res. 17 (1997) 433–438. 27A63. Kuz`niak, E. and H. Urbanek: The involvement of hydrogen peroxide in plant responses to stresses; Acta Physiol. Plant 22 (2000) 195–203. 27A64. Lala, P.K. and C. Chakraborty: Role of nitric oxide in carcinogenesis and tumour progression; Lancet Oncol. 2 (2001) 149–156.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
27A65. Leonard, S.S., S. Wang, X. Shi, B.S. Jordan, V. Castranova, and M.A. Dubick: Wood smoke particles generate free radicals and cause lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, NF-kappa-B activation and TNF-alpha release in macrophages; Toxicology 150(1–3) (2000) 147–157. 27A66. Li, Y., P. Kuppusamy, J.L. Zweier, and M.A. Trush: ESR evidence for the generation of reactive oxygen species from the copper-mediated oxidation of the benzene metabolite, hydroquinone: Role in DNA damage; Chem. Biol. Interact. 94 (1995) 101–120. 27A67. Li, Y. and M.A. Trush: Oxidation of hydroquinone by copper: Chemical mechanism and biological effects; Arch Biochem Biophys. 300 (1993) 346–355. 27A68. Masselot, D., I. Emami, C. Rolando, and S. Le Gac: A new and efficient method for detecting free radicals by LC-MS/ MS. Application to the optimization of a cigarette filter which remove free radicals in cigarette smoke; CORESTA Congress, New Orleans, LA, 2002, Smoke Science/Product Technology Groups, Abstr. STPOST13. 27A69. Masselot, D., S. Le Gac, I. Emami, and C. Rolando: A new method for detecting free radicals by LC-MS/MS. Application to the detection and quantitation of free radicals in cigarette smoke; Proc. 50th ASMS Conf. Mass Spec. Allied Topics, Orlando, FL, June 2–6, 2002. 27A70. McAnalley, S., C.M. Koepke, L. Le, E. Vennum, and B. McAnalley: In vitro methods for testing antioxidant potential: A review; see Internet site: (2003), See http:// www.glycoscience.org/glycoscience/document_viewer. wm?FILENAME=C014. 27A71. McCormick, M.L., G.R. Buettner, and B.E. Britigan: The spin trap alpha-(4-pyridyl-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitrone stimulates peroxidase-mediated oxidation of deferoxamine. Implications for pharmacological use of spin-trapping agents; J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995) 29265–29269. 27A72. Menzel, E.R., W.R. Vincent, and J.R. Wasson: Dipolar broadening of electron spin resonance lines of free radicals: Spin-trapping studies of free radicals in cigarette smoke; J. Magnetic Res. 21 (1976) 321–330. 27A73. Mittler, R.: Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance; Trends in Plant Science 7 (2002) 405–410. 27A74. Mittler, R., E. Hallak-Herr, B.L. Orvar, W. Van Camp, H. Willekens, D. Inzé, and B. Ellis: Transgenic tobacco plants with reduced capability to detoxify reactive oxygen intermediates are hyper-responsive to pathogen infection; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (1991) 14165–14170. 27A75. Muckenschnabel, I., B.A. Goodman, B. Williamson, G.D. Lyon, and N. Deighton: Infection of leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana by Botrytis cinerea: Changes in ascorbic acid, free radicals and lipid peroxidation products; J. Exp. Bot. 53 (2002) 207–214. 27A76. Müeller, C. and M. Intorp: Free radicals in mainstream cigarette smoke: Methodology and influencing parameters; CORESTA Meeting. Smoke Sci. Prod. Techno Groups, Freiburg, 2003, Abstr. ST 23. 27A77. Müller, T., H.J. Haussmann, and G. Schepers: Evidence for peroxynitrite as an oxidative stress-inducing compound of aqueous cigarette smoke fractions; Carcinogenesis 18 (1997) 295–301. 27A78. Nagendrappa, G.: An appreciation of free radicals. I. Introduction; Resonance 10 (2005) 72–78. 27A79. Nakayama, T, D.F. Church, and W.A. Pryor: Quantitative analysis of the hydrogen peroxide formed in aqueous
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1480
11/24/08 2:40:13 PM
1481
Bibliography
27A80.
27A81. 27A82.
27A82a. 27A82b.
27A83.
27A84.
27A85.
27A86.
27A87.
27A88.
27A89.
27A90.
27A91.
27A92.
27A93.
27A94.
cigarette tar extracts; Free Radic Biol. Med. 7 (1989) 9–15. Neill, S., R. Desikan, A. Clarke, R.D. Hurst, and J. Hancock: Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide as signaling molecules in plants; J. Exp. Bot. 53 (2002) 1237–1247. Neill, S., R. Desikan, and J. Hancock: Hydrogen peroxide signaling; Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5 (2002) 388–395. Norman, A.: Cigarette design and materials; in: Tobacco: Production, chemistry and technology, edited by D.L. Davis and M.T. Nielsen, Blackwell, London, 1999, 353–387. O’Brien, P.J.: Free-radical-mediated chemical carcinogenesis; Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 534 (1988) 552–564. Peacock, P.R. and J.B. Spence: Incidence of lung tumours in LX mice exposed to (1) free radicals; (2) SO2; Brit. J. Cancer 21 (1967) 606–618. Peto, R., J. Boreham, A.D. Lopez, M. Thun, and C. Heath: Mortality from tobacco in developed countries: Indirect estimation from national vital statistics; Lancet 339 (1992) 1268–1278. Prier, D.G.: Detection of free radicals from the reactions of ozone with olefins and from cigarette smoke by electron spin resonance techniques. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, LA, December 1981. Pryor, W.A.: Biological effects of cigarette smoke, wood smoke, and smoke from plastics: The use of electron spin resonance; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 13 (1992) 659–676. Pryor, W.A.: The chemistry and biology of cigarette smoke; 4th Annual Meeting of the Oxygen Society, San Francisco, CA, November 20–24, 1997, Paper 14. Pryor, W.A.: The free radical chemistry of cigarette smoke and the inactivation of alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor; in: Pulmonary emphysema and proteolysis, edited by J.C. Taylor and C. Mittman, Academic Press, New York, NY (1987) 369–392. Pryor, W.A., M.M. Dooley, and D.F. Church: Inactivation of human alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor by gas-phase cigarette smoke; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 122 (1984) 676–681. Pryor, W.A., M.M. Dooley, and D.F. Church: Mechanisms of cigarette smoke toxicity: The inactivation of human alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor by nitric oxide/isoprene mixtures in air; Chem. Biol. Interact. 54 (1985) 171–183. Pryor, W.A., K.N. Houk, C.S. Foote, J.M. Fukuto, L.J. Ignarro, G.L. Squadrito, and K.J.A. Davies: Free radical biology and medicine: It’s a gas, man!; Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 291 (2006) R491-R511. Pryor, W.A., D.G. Prier, and J.W. Lightsey: Unpublished data from the reaction of cyclohexene with NO2 at -78°C (1980). Pryor, W.A. and G.L. Squadrito: The chemistry of peroxynitrite: A product from the reaction of nitric oxide with superoxide; Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 268 (1995) L699-L722. Pryor, W.A., K. Stone, L.Y. Zang, and E. Bermudez: Fractionation of aqueous cigarette tar extracts: Fractions that contain the tar radical cause DNA damage; Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11 (1998) 441–448. Pryor, W.A., M. Tamura, M.M. Dooley, P. Premovic, B.J. Hales, and D.F. Church: Reactive oxy-radicals from cigarette smoke and their physiological effects; in: Oxy
27A95.
27A96.
27A97.
27A98.
27A99.
27A100.
27A101.
27A102.
27A103.
27A104.
27A105.
27A106.
27A107.
27A108.
27A109.
27A110.
27A111.
radicals and their scavenger system. cellular and medical aspects, edited by R. Greenwald and G. Cohen, Elsevier Science Publishing, New York, NY (1983) 185–192. Pryor, W.A., K. Terauchi, and W.H. Davis: Electron spin resonance (ESR) study of cigarette smoke by use of spin trapping techniques; Environ. Health Perspect. 16 (1976) 161–176. Rahman, I. and W. MacNee: Oxidant/antioxidant imbalance in smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Thorax 51 (1996) 348–350. Rahman, I. and W. MacNee: Role of oxidants/antioxidants in smoking-induced lung diseases; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 21 (1996) 669–681. Rex, R.W.: Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies of stable free radicals in lignins and humic acids; Nature 188 (1960) 1185–1186. Rolando, C., F. Cantais and I. Emami: Precise identification of free radicals in cigarette smoke by exact mass measurement using nano-LC, nano ESI FT-MS/ MS; CORESTA Congress, Paris, 2006, Smoke Science/ Product Technology Groups, Abstr. SS20. Rolando, C., I. Emami, D. Masselot, and S. Le Gac: Removal of free radicals in mainstream cigarette smoke by filters including natural antioxidant: Identification and behavior of oxygen, nitrogen and carbon centered radicals by a new and robust LC-MS/MS method; CORESTA Congress, Kyoto, 2004, Smoke Science/ Product Technology Groups, Abstr. SSPOST14. Rowland, J.R., D.G. Cadena, and A.L. Gross: Effects of tobacco smoke on lung tissue as measured by electron spin resonance; Nature 213 (1967) 1256. Rowland, J.R., R.M. Estefan, E.M. Gause, and D.A. Montalvo: An ESR study of tobacco smoke condensates and their effects upon blood constituents; Environ. Res. 2 (1968) 47. Sanchez-Moreno, C.: Review: Methods used to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity in foods and biological systems; Food Sci. Tech. Int. 8 (2002) 121–137. Shulaev, V. and D.J. Oliver: Metabolic and proteomic markers for oxidative stress: New tools for reactive oxygen species research; Plant Physiol. (Special Issue on Reactive Oxygen Species), 141 (2006) 367–372. S`lesak, I., M. Libik, B. Karpinska, S. Karpinski, and Z. Miszalski: The role of hydrogen peroxide in regulation of plant metabolism and cellular signalling in response to environmental stresses; Acta Biochimica Polonica 54 (2007) 39–50. Squadrito, G.L. and W.A. Pryor: Oxidative chemistry of nitric oxide: the roles of superoxide, peroxynitrite, and carbon dioxide; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 25 (1998) 392–403. Steelink, C.: Free radical studies of lignin, lignin degradation products and soil humic acids; Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 28 (1964) 1615–1622. Steelink, C., T. Reid, and G. Tollin: On the nature of the free-radical moiety in lignin; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85 (1963) 4048–4049. Stohs, S.J. and D. Bagchi: Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 18 (1995) 321–336. Stohs, S.J., D. Bagchi, and M. Bagchi: Toxicity of trace elements in tobacco smoke; Inhal. Toxicol. 9 (1997) 867–890. Stone, K., E. Bermúdez, L.Y. Zang, K.M. Carter, K.E. Queenan, and W.A. Pryor: The ESR properties, DNA
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1481
11/24/08 2:40:14 PM
1482
27A112.
27A113.
27A114. 27A115.
27A116.
27A117.
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
nicking, and DNA association of aged solutions of catechol versus aqueous extracts of tar from cigarette smoke; Arch Biochem. Biophys. 319 (1995) 196–203. Tanigawa, T., T. Yoshikawa, S. Takahashi, Y. Naito, and M. Kondo: Spin trapping of superoxide in aqueous solutions of fresh and aged cigarette smoke; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 17 (1994) 361–365. Tarpey, M.M., D.A. Wink, and M.B. Grisham: Methods for detection of reactive metabolites of oxygen and nitrogen: In vitro and in vivo considerations; Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 286 (2004) 431–444. Tso, T.C.: The potential for producing safer cigarette tobacco; Agricultural Science Review 10 (1972) 1–10. Tu1ly, G.W., C.D. Briggs, and A. Horsfield: EPR absorption by the vapour phase of cigarette smoke, condensed and examined at low temperatures; Chem. Ind. (1969) 201–203. Utsumi, H. and K. Yamada: In vivo electron spin resonance-computed tomography/nitroxyl probe technique for non-invasive analysis of oxidative injuries; Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 416 (2003) 1–8. Utsumi, H., K. Yamada, K. Ichikawa, K. Sakai, Y. Kinoshita, S. Matsumoto, and M. Nagai: Simultaneous molecular imaging of redox reactions monitored by Overhauser-enhanced MRI with 14N- and 15N-labeled nitroxyl radicals; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006) 1463–1468.
27A118. Valavanidis, A. and E. Haralambous: A comparative study by electron paramagnetic resonance of free radical species in the mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes with conventional acetate filters and bio-filters; Redox Report 6 (2001) 161–171. 27A119. Vranova, E., D. Inzé, and F. Van Breusegem: Signal transduction during oxidative stress; J. Exp. Bot. 53 (2002) 1227–1236. 27A120. Wooten, J.B., S. Chouchane, and T.E. McGrath: Tobacco smoke constituents affecting oxidative stress; in: Cigarette smoke and oxidative stress, edited by B.H. Halliwell and H.E. Poulsen (Eds), Springer, Berlin (2006) 5–46. 27A121. Yan, F., S. Williams, G.D. Griffin, R. Jagannathan, S.E. Plunkett, K.H. Shafer, and T. Vo-Dinh: Near-real-time determination of hydrogen peroxide generated from cigarette smoke; J. Environ. Monit. 7 (2005) 681–687. 27A122. Zang, L.Y., K. Stone, and W.A. Pryor: Detection of free radicals in aqueous extracts of cigarette tar by electron spin resonance; Free Radic. Biol. Med. 19 (1995) 161–167. 27A123. Zhou, J., M. Zhu, Z. Qu, J. Liu, L. Yan, Z. Yang, and Z. Cao: A systematic study on the free radicals in cigarette smoke: Elimination and biomedical evaluation; CORESTA Congress, Kyoto, 2004, Smoke Science/ Product Technology Groups, Abstr. SS15.
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C029.indd 1482
11/24/08 2:40:14 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Components Identified in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke The Index was created for two purposes. The first was to capture in one site all the basic information on the identified tobacco and tobacco smoke components discussed in the chapters of the book. The components in the Index are listed alphabetically. Secondly, the Index may permit the reader to easily retrieve or search for information on a specific tobacco and/or smoke component or class of components so that further study will be facilitated. To achieve these goals, the Index was constructed to include the following: 1) The CAS No. for many of the components, 2) an indication of the component identification in tobacco, tobacco smoke, or both, 3) the structure of many of the components, 4) the table number and chapter in which the component is not only referenced but its properties are described, particularly if they are considered adverse, 5) for multifunctional components, several chapters and table numbers are cited. Additionally, the publishers of the book, Taylor and Francis Books/CRC Press of Boca Raton, FL, have provided a Compact Disk (readonly memory) (CD-ROM) format of the Index. Hopefully, the searchable format of the CD-ROM will aid the reader in retrieving any desired information. The Index comprises almost 8700 components completely or partially identified in tobacco, tobacco smoke, and tobacco substitute smoke. It includes not only over 8400 identified components but also several hundred compounds not identified in tobacco or tobacco smoke but reported by Doull et al. (1053) as tobacco ingredients used in the U.S.A. and by Baker et al. (172a, 174b) as tobacco ingredients used outside the U.S.A. and in a summary by Rodgman (3266) and in our Chapter 24. Because the transfer from a tobacco product to smoke of very few of the added ingredients has been examined, they primarily are listed as tobacco components. Exceptions include several humectants used in tobacco products for many years. However, it should be noted that the detailed pyrolysis study by Baker and Bishop (172a) indicated that many such added ingredients would transfer in part to MSS during the tobacco smoking process. In some instances, the reader may wonder about the peculiar nature of the component listing. For example, a tobacco smoke component initially reported as 2-butene was later shown to be present in the smoke as cis-and trans-2butene. Thus, three items are listed in the Index for 2-butene, namely, 2-butene (CAS No. 107-10-7), 2-butene, (Z)-(CAS No. 590-18-1), and 2-butene, (E)-(CAS No. 624-64-6). In the
appropriate chapter and table, Chapter 1, Table I.B-1, references to the identification of each are provided. 2-Butenedioic acid is similarly listed in Chapter 4, Table IV.A-3 as 2-butenedioic acid (CAS No. 6915-18-0), 2-butenedioic acid, (Z)-(maleic acid) (CAS No. 110-16-7), 2-butenedioic acid, (E)-(fumaric acid) (CAS No. 110-17-8). The reader will also find in the Index certain broad classifications of components, like oxidases and free radicals. These and similar examples in the Index are not there to confuse the reader, as many of the individual components in the broad classifications have specific CAS numbers1. Generally, the references associated with these classes of components (found within the chapters noted in the Index) will provide the reader with information of a common nature. In nearly all cases, individual components such as ascorbate oxidase, choline oxidase, cytochrome oxidase, and glycolate oxidase follow after the broadly classified component, oxidase. Likewise, specific free radicals such as methyl-acyl radical, ethyl-acyl radical, and propyl-acyl radical {2 isomers} may be found in the Index. For some components in the Index, several partially identified isomers exist, their number noted, and included in the total number of components identified in tobacco and/or smoke. While the number of enzymes, genes, and nucleotides listed in the Index is fewer than 500, their known number, as noted in Chapter 21, exceeds many thousands. The paltry number of enzymes, genes, and nucleotides listed in Chapter 21, Table XXI-2 was never intended to represent the total biological agents operating in the plant. Those selected for inclusion were from texts, research manuscripts, and patents where active research was conducted in the past in attempts to better understand the physiology and biochemistry of tobacco. As future genetic research develops, it is envisioned that the identity and function of hundreds of thousands of additional chemicals will be published. The authors hope that the format of the Index and accompanying CD-ROM will help the reader to reach a better understanding of the components of tobacco and tobacco smoke.
1
Each CAS Registry Number used throughout the Alphabetical Components Index and the various preceding chapters is a Registered Trademark of the American Chemical Society.
1483
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1483
11/24/08 1:55:32 PM
1484
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke Note: S = tobacco smoke component, T = tobacco component, ST = component of both S and T Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
202-03-9
1
0
0
Aceanthrylene
I.E
340-99-8
1
0
0
Acenaphth[1,2-a]acenaphthylene
I.E
71265-26-4
1
0
0
Acenaphth[1,2-a]acenaphthylene, methyl-
206-49-5
1
0
0
Acenaphtho[1,2-b]pyridine
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
I.E
{7-azafluoranthene}
XVII.E
N
208-96-8
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene
1
I.E
2
3
8
4
7 6
{acenaphthene}
5
83-32-9
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1,2-dihydro-
60684-29-9
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1,2-dihydrodimethyl-
I.E
36541-21-6
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1,2-dihydromethyl-
I.E
I.E
60826-72-4
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1,2-dihydrotetramethyl-
I.E
60826-69-9
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1,2-dihydrotrimethyl-
I.E
60826-68-8
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, dimethyl-
I.E
19346-00-0
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1,3-dimethyl-
I.E
58548-40-6
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, diphenyl-
I.E
58548-38-2
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, methyl-
I.E
19345-99-4
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 1-methyl-
I.E
19345-94-9
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 3-methyl-
I.E
19345-97-2
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 4-methyl-
I.E
19345-91-6
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, 5-methyl-
I.E
60826-73-5
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, tetramethyl-
I.E
60826-70-2
1
0
0
Acenaphthylene, trimethyl-
I.E
201-06-9
1
0
0
Acephenanthrylene
I.E
6232-48-0
1
0
0
Acephenanthrylene, 4,5-dihydro-
I.E
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1484
11/24/08 1:55:32 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1485
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
75-07-0
1
0
0
Acetaldehyde
H3C-CH=O
III-12
5371-49-3
1
0
0
Acetaldehyde, (acetyloxy)-
H3C-COO-CH2-CH=O
III-12
6542-88-7
1
0
0
Acetaldehyde, amino-
141-46-8
1
0
0
Acetaldehyde, hydroxy-
1
0
0
Acetaldehyde, methoxy-
0
1
0
Acetaldehyde, (2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-2-cyclohexen1-ylidene)-
16825-04-0
{glycolaldehyde}
H2N-CH2-CH=O
III-12, XII-2
HO-CH2-CH=O
III-12, II.A-6
CH3O-CH2-CH=O H3C
CH2-CH=O
O
60-35-5
1
0
0
Acetamide
1113-68-4
1
1
1
Acetamide, N-acetyl-N-methyl-
1119-49-9
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-butyl-
15972-60-8
0
1
0
Acetamide, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N(methoxymethyl){Alachlor®}
III-12, X-2 III-12, III-13
CH3
CH3
H3C-CO-NH2
XIII-1
CH H3C-CO-N< 3 CO-CH3
XIII-1
H3C-CO-NH-C4H9
XIII-1 XIII-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CH3 CO-CH2-Cl N CH2-OCH3 C2H5
51218-45-2
0
1
0
Acetamide, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl){Metolachlor®}
X-2, XIII-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CH3 CO-CH2-Cl N CH-CH2-OCH3 C2H5
107-91-5
1
0
0
Acetamide, 2-cyano-
57966-95-7
0
1
0
Acetamide, 2-cyano-2-methoxyimino-N(ethylcarbamoyl){Cymoxanil®}
CH3
NC-CH2-CO-NH2 CN H N
N O
O
H N
XI-2, XIII-1 XI-2, XIII-1, XXI-3
O
685-91-6
1
0
0
Acetamide, N,N-diethyl-
H3C-CO-N=(C2H5)2
XIII-1
127-19-5
1
1
1
Acetamide, N,N-dimethyl
H3C-CO-N=(CH3)2
XIII-1
H3C-CO-NH-C2H5
XIII-1
625-50-3
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-ethyl-
38806-26-7
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-ethyl-N-methyl-
5663-62-7
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-(2-furanylmethyl)-
621-42-1
0
1
0
Acetamide, 3-hydroxyphenyl-
CH3 H3C-CO-N< C2H5
XIII-1 X-2, XIII-1 IX-22, XIII-1
79-16-3
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-methyl-
H3C-CO-NH-CH3
XIII-1
54824-90-7
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-(2-methylbutyl)-
H3C-CO-NH-CH2-CH(CH3)-C2H5
XIII-1
13434-12-3
0
1
0
Acetamide, N-(3-methylbutyl)
H3C-CO-NH-(CH2)2-CH=(CH3)2
XIII-1
1189-05-5
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-(1-methylpropyl)-
H3C-CO-NH-CH(CH3)-C2H5
XIII-1
1540-94-9
1
1
1
Acetamide, N-(2-methylpropyl)-
H3C-CO-NH-CH2-CH=(CH3)2
XIII-1
7737-16-8
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-(2-oxopropyl)-
H3C-CO-NH-CH2-CO-CH3
103-84-4
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-phenyl-
H3C-CO-NH-C6H5
XIII-1
877-95-2
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-(2-phenylethyl)-
H3C-CO-NH-CH2-CH2-C6H5
XIII-1
692-33-1
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-2-propenyl-
H3C-CO-NH-CH2-CH=CH2
XIII-1
5331-48-6
1
0
0
Acetamide, N-propyl-
H3C-CO-NH-C3H7
354-38-1
1
0
0
Acetamide, 2,2,2-trifluoro-
F3C-CO-NH2
III-13, XIII-1
XIII-1 XIII-1, XVIII.B-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1485
11/24/08 1:55:33 PM
1486
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
16752-77-5
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Acetamidic acid, thio-, N-[(methylcarbamoyl)oxy]-, methyl ester {Methomyl®}
XIII-1, XXI-3
O S
N
O
N H
-
1
0
0
Acetate
H3C-COO
64-19-7
1
1
1
Acetic acid
H3C-COOH
13831-30-6
1
1
1
Acetic acid, (acetyloxy)-
H3C-COO-CH2-COOH (H3C-CO)2O
108-24-7
1
0
0
Acetic acid, anhydride
162188-92-3
0
1
0
Acetic acid, bromo-, 7,9,9-trimethyl-8-oxo-1,4dioxaspiro[4.5]dec-7-yl ester, (r)-
123-86-4
1
1
1
Acetic acid, butyl ester
79-43-6
0
1
0
Acetic acid, dichloro-
94-75-7
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-
162188-93-4
0
1
0
Acetic acid, (diethoxyphosphinyl)-, 7,9,9-trimethyl-8oxo-1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]dec-7-yl ester, (r)-
{butyl acetate}
XX-6 IV.A-3 VII-1
H3C-COO-C4H9
V-3
Cl2CH-COOH
IV.A-3
{2,4-D}
IV.A-3, X-2, XXI-3 V-3, X-2
0
1
0
Acetic acid, (dimethylamino)oxo-
108-05-4
1
0
0
Acetic acid, ethenyl ester
{vinyl acetate}
H3C-COO-CH=CH2
{ethyl acetate}
H3C-COO-C2H5
141-78-6
1
1
1
Acetic acid, ethyl ester
1
0
0
Acetic acid, 2-furanyl-
(H3C)2=N-CO-COOH
0
1
0
Acetic acid, heptyl ester
629-70-9
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 1-hexadecyl ester
142-92-7
0
1
0
Acetic acid, hexyl ester
79-14-1
1
1
1
Acetic acid, hydroxy-
IV.A-3, V-3 V-3 V-3 IV.A-3, X-2
O
112-06-1
IV.A-3, V-3 V-3, XVIII.B-3
32833-96-8
123617-80-1
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{hexyl acetate} {glycolic acid}
CH2-COOH
H3C-COO-(CH2)6-CH3
V-3
H3C-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
H3C-COO-(CH2)5-CH3
V-3
HOCH2-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
623-50-7
1
0
0
Acetic acid, hydroxy-, ethyl ester
HOCH2-COO-C2H5
II.A-5, V-3
61892-60-2
1
1
1
Acetic acid, hydroxy-, 2-hydroxypropyl ester
HOCH 2-COO-CH2-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5, V-3
96-35-5
1
0
0
Acetic acid, hydroxy-, methyl ester
HOCH2-COO-CH3
II.A-5, V-3
90357-58-7
1
1
1
Acetic acid, hydroxy-, propyl ester
HOCH2-COO-C3H7
II.A-5, V-3
1
0
0
Acetic acid, hydroxymethyl ester
H3C-COO-CH2OH
II.A-5, V-3
1
0
0
Acetic acid, 2-hydroxypropyl ester
H3C-COO-CH2-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5, V-3 IV.A-3, X-2
627-69-0 625-45-6
0
1
0
Acetic acid, methoxy-
H3C-O-CH2-COOH
79-20-9
1
1
1
Acetic acid, methyl ester
H3C-COO-CH3
V-3
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 2-methylbutyl ester
H3C-COO-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
V-3
123-92-2
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester
H3C-COO-(CH2)2-CH=(CH3)2
V-3
1191-16-8
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 3-methyl-2-butenyl ester
H3C-COO-CH2-CH=C=(CH3)2
V-3
H3C-COO-CH=(CH3)2
108-21-4
1
1
1
Acetic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
72360-04-4
1
0
0
Acetic acid, 2-(5-methylfuranyl)H3C
35897-16-6
0
1
0
V-3 IV.A-3, X-2
Acetic acid, 2-methyl-3-pentyl ester
O
CH2-COOH
H3C-COO-CH(C2H5)-CH=(CH3)2
110-19-0
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester {isobutyl acetate}
H3C-COO-CH2-CH=(CH3)2
298-12-4
1
1
1
Acetic acid, oxo-
O=CH-COOH
{glyoxylic acid}
V-3 V-3 IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1486
11/24/08 1:55:33 PM
1487
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1
0
0
Acetic acid, 2-oxopropyl ester
H3C-COO-CH2-CO-CH3
628-63-7
0
1
0
Acetic acid, pentyl ester
H3C-COO-(CH2)4-CH3
24851-98-7
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 2-pentyl-3-oxo-1-cyclopentyl-, methyl ester {methyl dihydrojasmonate}
103-45-7
1
1
1
Acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester {2-phenethyl acetate}
140-11-4
1
1
1
122-72-5
0
1
0
13147-57-4
0
1
0
Acetic acid, (phosphonoxy)-
Chapter Table III-13, V-3 V-3 V-3
H3C-COO-(CH2)2-C6H5
V-3
Acetic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl acetate}
H3C-COO-CH2-C6H5
V-3
Acetic acid, phenylpropyl ester
H3C-COO-(CH2)3-C6H5
V-3
127-08-2
0
1
0
Acetic acid, potassium salt
109-60-4
0
1
0
Acetic acid, propyl ester
IV.A-3 H3C-COO-K {propyl acetate}
127-09-3
0
1
0
Acetic acid, sodium salt
93-76-5
0
1
0
Acetic acid, 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy-
XX-6
H3C-COO-(CH2)2-CH3 H3C-COO-Na
{2,4,5-T®}
XX-6 IV.A-3, X-2, XXI-3
Cl Cl
V-3
O-CH2COOH Cl
76-49-3
0
1
0
Acetic acid, endo-1,7,7trimethylbicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-yl ester {bornyl acetate}
75-05-8
1
0
0
Acetonitrile
H3C-CN
926-64-7
1
0
0
Acetonitrile, (dimethylamino)-
(H3C)2=N-CH2-CN
107-16-4
1
0
0
Acetonitrile, hydroxy-
HOCH2-CN
II.A-5, XI-2
O=CH-CN
III-12. XI-2
4471-47-0
V-3
XI-2 XI-2
1
0
0
Acetonitrile, oxo-
0
1
0
Acetylserine sulfhydrylase
XXII-2
9040-07-7
0
1
0
Acetyltransferase, chloramphenicol
XXII-2
260-94-6
1
0
0
Acridine
{benzo[b]quinoline}
XVII.E-6 N
92-81-9
1
0
0
Acridine, 9,10-dihydro-
XVII.E-6
{acridan} N H
6267-02-3
1
0
0
Acridine, 9,10-dihydro-9,9-dimethyl{9,9-dimethylacridan}
XVII.E-6
26914-16-9
1
0
0
Acridine, 9,10-dihydro-9,9-dimethyl-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
63451-42-3
1
0
0
Acridine, 9,10-dihydro-9,9-dimethyl-2-(1methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
64828-44-0
1
0
0
Acridine, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
54116-90-4
1
0
0
Acridine, methyl-
XVII.E-6
64828-45-1
1
0
0
Acridine, propyl-
XVII.E-6
7440-34-8
1
1
1
Actinium
Ac
XX-5 XX-5 XX-5
20379-10-6,
0
1
0
Actinium, isotope of mass 226
226
14331-83-0
0
1
0
Actinium, isotope of mass 228
228
50-76-0
0
1
0
Actinomycin D
1
0
0
Acyl radical, methyl-
COCH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Acyl radical, ethyl-
COCH2CH3
XXVII-1
Ac Ac
XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1487
11/24/08 1:55:33 PM
1488
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Acyl radical, propyl-
{2 isomers}
COCH2CH2CH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Acyl radical, butyl-
{3 isomers}
COCH 2CH2CH2CH3
XXVII-1
141733-40-6
0
1
0
Acyltransferase, glycerol phosphate (Arabidopsis thaliana clone BX3.6/BB2.6 reduced)
58-61-7
0
1
0
Adenosine
XXII-2 NH2 N N O
N
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
N OH
HOCH2 OH
60-92-4
0
1
0
Adenosine, cyclic 3',5'-(hydrogen phosphate)
II.A-5
139636-55-8
0
1
0
Adenosine, 2'-deoxyadenylyl-(3'o5')-thymidylyl(3'o5')-2'-deoxyguanylyl-(3'o5')-2'-deoxyguanylyl(3'o5')-thymidylyl-(3'o5')-2'-deoxyguanylyl(3'o5')-thymidylyl-(3'o5')-thymidylyl-(3'o5')thymidylyl-(3'o5')-thymidylyl-(3'o5')-thymidylyl(3'o5')-2'-deoxyguanylyl-(3'o5')-2'-deoxyadenylyl(3'o5')-thymidylyl-(3'o5')-2'-deoxycytidylyl(3'o5')-thymidylyl-(3'o5')-2'-deoxyguanylyl(3'o5')-2'-deoxy-
XXII-2
146689-29-4
0
1
0
Adenosine, 2'-deoxycytidylyl-(5'o3')-2'deoxycytidylyl-(5'o3')-2'-deoxyguanylyl-(5'o3')-2'deoxycytidylyl-(5'o3')-2'-deoxycytidylyl-(5'o3')-2'deoxyguanylyl-(5'o3')-2'-deoxy-
XXII-2
28542-78-1
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butenyl)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
6025-53-2
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butenyl)-, (E)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
15896-46-5
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butenyl)-, (Z)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
26190-61-4
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butenyl)-2(methylthio)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
53274-45-6
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butenyl)-2(methylthio)-, (E)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
52049-48-6
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-butenyl)-2(methylthio)-, (Z)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
22663-55-4
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(4-hydroxy-3-methylbutyl)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
7724-76-7
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
75081-82-2
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-[3-methyl-4-[(O-phosphono-E-Dglucopyranosyl)oxy]-2-butenyl]-, (E)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
4294-16-0
0
1
0
Adenosine, N-(phenylmethyl)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
56-65-5
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate)
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
40922-97-2
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate), N(phenylmethyl)-
58-64-0
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate)
53-57-6
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), 2'(dihydrogen phosphate), P'o5'-ester with 1,4dihydro-1-E-D-ribofuranosyl-3pyridinecarboxamide
II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1488
11/24/08 1:55:34 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1489
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
53-59-8
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), 2'(dihydrogen phosphate), P'o5'-ester with 3(aminocarbonyl)-1-E-D-ribofuranosylpyridinium hydroxide, inner salt
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2, XVII.B-2
7298-93-3
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), 5'o5'-ester with 3-(aminocarbonyl)-1-D-Dribofuranosylpyridinium hydroxide, inner salt
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2, XVII.B-2
55030-93-8
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), N-(3methyl-2-butenyl)-
22732-83-8
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen pyrophosphate), mono-Dglucopyranosyl ester
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
40811-89-0
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), N(phenylmethyl)-
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
58-68-4
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), P'o5'ester with 1,4-dihydro-1-E-D-ribofuranosyl-3pyridinecarboxamide
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
53-84-9
0
1
0
Adenosine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), P'o5'ester with 3-(aminocarbonyl)-1-E-Dribofuranosylpyridinium hydroxide, inner salt
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.E-6
9012-52-6
0
1
0
Adenosyltransferase, methionine
Name (per CA Collective Index)
84-21-9
0
1
0
3'-Adenylic acid
61-19-8
0
1
0
5'-Adenylic acid
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, V-3
XXII-2 II.A-5, X-2, XII-2 II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
N H2N
N
N
OH
N
OH O
O
CH2O--P
OH
OH
20268-93-3
0
1
0
5'-Adenylic acid, N-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
13484-66-7
0
1
0
5'-Adenylic acid, N-(phenylmethyl)-
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
9012-39-9
0
1
0
Adenylyltransferase, sulfate
XXII-2
6898-94-8
1
1
1
Alanine
62-57-7
0
1
0
Alanine, 2-methyl-
(CH3)2=C(NH2) COOH
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
13100-82-8
0
1
0
Alanine, 3-sulfo-
HO-SO2-CH2-C(NH2) COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7
107-95-9
0
1
0
E-Alanine
H2N-(CH2)2-COOH
79-83-4
0
1
0
E-Alanine, N-(2,4-dihydroxy-3,3-dimethyl-1oxobutyl)-, (R)-
10478-42-9
1
1
1
E-Alanine, N-methyl-N-nitroso- = Propanoic acid, 3(methylnitrosamino){NMPA}
133201-38-4
1
0
0
E-Alanine, N-(nitrosomethyl)-
1
0
0
E-Alanine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-, methyl ester
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)2-COOCH3 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XV-8
923-16-0
0
1
0
D-Alanine, N-D-alanyl-
H2N-(CH2)2-CO-NH-(CH2)2-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7
56-41-7
1
1
1
L-Į-Alanine
H3C-CH(NH2)-COOH
IV.A-3, IV.B-7 IV.A-3, IV.B-7 IV.A-3, IV.B-7
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)2-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XV-8 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XV-8
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1489
11/24/08 1:55:34 PM
1490
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
52756-25-9
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures Cl
DL-Alanine, N-benzoyl-N-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-, methyl ester {Flamprop-methyl®}
XXI-3
O C6H5
N
F
Chapter Table
CH-CH3 H3C-OOC
16124-24-6
0
1
0
L-Alanine, N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)-
82560-54-1
0
1
0
ȕ-Alanine, N-(((((2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7benzofuranyl)oxy)carbonyl)methylamino)thio)-N(1-methylethyl)-, ethyl ester {Benfuracarb®}
II.A-5, IV.A-3 OOC-R O
X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 R = -NH-S-N[CH(CH3)2]-(CH2)2-COOC2H5 57646-30-7
0
1
0
X-2, XXI-3
O
DL-Alanine, N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(2furanylcarbonyl-, methyl ester {Furalaxyl®}
O O
N
O
57837-19-1
0
1
0
X-2, XXI-3
O
DL-Alanine, N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N(methoxyacetyl)-, methyl ester {Ridomil®}
H3 C CH3
CH3
O N
O
CH3
71626-11-4
0
1
0
CH3
O
XXI-3
DL-Alanine, N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N(phenylacetyl)-, methyl ester {Benalaxyl®}
O
N
O O
9006-50-2
0
1
0
Albumin
XXII-2
9048-46-8
0
1
0
Albumins, blood serum
XXII-2
9024-52-6
0
1
0
Aldolase, fructose diphosphate
XXII-2
9026-94-2
0
1
0
Aldolase, phospho-2-keto-3-deoxyheptonate
XXII-2
145137-43-5
0
1
0
Aldolase, phospho-2-keto-3-deoxyheptonate (tobacco clone NtDAHPS-1 precursor reduced)
XXII-2
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical, methyl-
CONHCH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical, ethyl-
CONHCH2CH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical, propyl- {2 isomers}
CONHCH2CH2CH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical, butyl-
CONHCH2CH2CH2CH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical, pentyl- {3 isomers}
CONHCH2CH2CH2CH2CH3
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical (unsaturated)
C5H8NO
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Alkylaminocarbonyl radical (unsaturated)
C7H12NO
0
1
0
D-Allose
2595-97-3
{2 isomers}
HO
XXVII-1
O OH
II.A-5, VIII-3
HO OH
OH
7429-90-5
1
1
1
Aluminum
Al
XX-5
1344-28-1
0
1
0
Aluminum oxide
Al2O3
9031-85-0
0
1
0
Aminoacyltransferase
XXII-2
9031-94-1
0
1
0
Aminopeptidase
XXII-2
XX-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1490
11/24/08 1:55:34 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1491
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 9001-61-0
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Aminopeptidase, cytosol
XXII-2
0
1
0
Aminopeptidase, leucine
XXII-2
37277-82-0
0
1
0
Aminopropyltransferase, putrescine
XXII-2
9031-66-7
0
1
0
Aminotransferase
XXII-2
9000-86-6
0
1
0
Aminotransferase, alanine
XXII-2
9000-97-9
0
1
0
Aminotransferase, aspartate
XXII-2
50812-10-7
0
1
0
Aminotransferase, glutamate-glyoxylate
XXII-2
9030-42-6
0
1
0
Aminotransferase, ornithine-keto acid
XXII-2
37259-57-7
0
1
0
Aminotransferase, serine-glyoxylate
7664-41-7
1
1
1
Ammonia
9024-28-6
0
1
0
Ammonia-lyase, phenylalanine
XXII-2 NH3
XII-2 XXII-2
NH4
+1
14798-03-9
1
1
1
Ammonium
53516-76-0
0
1
0
Ammonium chloride, alkyldimethylbenzyl{Benazlkonium chloride®}
XX-6
1336-21-6
0
1
0
Ammonium hydroxide
NH4OH
XX-6
12135-76-1
0
1
0
Ammonium sulfide
(NH4)2S
XVIII.A-1, XX-6
9000-92-4
0
1
0
Amylase
9000-90-2
0
1
0
Amylase, D-
XXII-2
9000-91-3
0
1
0
Amylase, E-
XXII-2
9067-73-6
0
1
0
Amylase, iso-
XXII-2
XVIII.B-3, XX1-3
XXII-2
9005-84-9
0
1
0
Amylodextrin
VIII-3
9037-22-3
0
1
0
Amylopectin
VIII-3
9005-82-7
0
1
0
Amylose
VIII-3
32222-21-2
0
1
0
Androsta-3,5-dien-7-one
III-13
0
1
0
Anhydrase, carbonate
189-58-2
1
0
0
Anthra[9,1,2-cde]benzo[h]cinnoline
610-49-1
1
0
0
1-Anthracenamine
O
XXII-2
XVII.E-6
9 1
7
5
1
0
0
9-Anthracenamine
120-12-7
1
1
1
Anthracene
2 3
6
779-03-3
XII-2
NH2 8
10
4
XII-2 8
9
1
7
2
6
3 5
10
I.E-6
4
1
0
0
Anthracene, alkyl-
I.E-6
613-31-0
1
0
0
Anthracene, 9,10-dihydro-
I.E-6
29063-00-1
1
0
0
Anthracene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1491
11/24/08 1:55:35 PM
1492
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
781-43-1
1
0
0
Anthracene, 9,10-dimethyl-
I.E-6
41637-86-9
1
0
0
Anthracene, ethyl-
I.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
605-83-4
1
0
0
Anthracene, 9-ethyl-
I.E-6
71265-29-7
1
0
0
Anthracene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
26914-18-1
1
0
0
Anthracene, methyl-
I.E-6
610-48-0
1
0
0
Anthracene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
613-12-7
1
0
0
Anthracene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
779-02-2
1
0
0
Anthracene, 9-methyl-
I.E-6
71265-30-0
1
0
0
Anthracene, propyl-
I.E-6
27358-28-7
1
0
0
Anthracene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
0
1
0
1,4-Anthracenedione, 2,3-dimethyl-
IX.B-2
0 CH3
CH3 0
84-65-1
1
1
1
9,10-Anthracenedione
{9,10-anthraquinone}
IX.B-2, XXI-3
O 1 2 2 4 O
20724-30-5
1
0
0
9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,2-diethyl-
IX.B-2
71265-31-1
1
0
0
9,10-Anthracenedione, dimethyl-
IX.B-2
1
0
0
9,10-Anthracenedione, 2,3-dimethyl-
IX.B-2
27936-34-1
1
0
0
9,10-Anthracenedione, methyl-
IX.B-2
84-54-8
1
1
1
9,10-Anthracenedione, 2-methyl-
IX.B-2
1
0
0
9,10-Anthracenedione, trimethyl-
IX.B-2
1
0
0
9(10H)-Anthracenone
90-44-8
{anthrone}
1 9
7
2 3
6 5
7440-36-0
1
1
1
III-13
O 8
10
4
Antimony
Sb
XX-5 XX-5 XX-5
14683-10-4
1
1
1
Antimony, isotope of mass 124
124
14331-88-5
0
1
0
Antimony, isotope of mass 129
129
Sb Sb
9000-95-7
0
1
0
Apyrase
11078-27-6
0
1
0
Arabinan
XXII-2
20261-96-5
1
1
1
Arabinohexonic acid, 3-deoxy-, J-lactone
II.A-5, VI-3, VIII-3
42400-32-8
0
1
0
D-Arabinohexonic acid, 2-deoxy-, J-lactone
II.A-5, VI-3, VIII-3
23675-06-1
0
1
0
D-D-Arabinohexopyranoside, 2-deoxy-D-D-arabinohexopyranosyl 2-deoxy-
154-17-6
0
1
0
D-Arabinohexose, 2-deoxy-
16449-30-2
0
1
0
D-Arabinohexose, 2-deoxy-4-O-E-D-glucopyranosyl-
13752-83-5
0
1
0
Arabinonic acid
II.A-5, VIII-3
II.A-5, VIII-3 II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2 II.A-5, VIII-3 HO-CH2-(CHOH)3-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1492
11/24/08 1:55:35 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1493
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
13280-76-7
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Arabinonic acid, J-lactone
HO
147-81-9
II.A-5, VI-3
OH
HOCH2
Chapter Table
O
O
1
1
1
Arabinose
HO-CH2-(CHOH)3-CH=O
0
1
0
Arabitinol , 2,3-di-O-methyl-
HO-CH2-CHOH-(CHOCH3)2-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, X-2
II.A-5, III-12
0
1
0
Arabitinol , 2,5-di-O-methyl-
H3CO-CH2-(CHOH)2-(CHOCH3)-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, X-2
0
1
0
Arabitinol , 3,5-di-O-methyl-
H3CO-CH2-CHOH-(CHOCH3)-CHOH-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, X-2
0
1
0
Arabitinol , 2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-
HO-CH2-(CHOCH3)3-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, X-2
0
1
0
Arabitinol , 2,3,5-tri-O-methyl-
H3CO-CH2-CHOH-(CHOCH3)2-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, X-2
9040-27-1
0
1
0
Arabinoxylan
7004-12-8
0
1
0
Arginine
1069-09-6 34522-32-2
0
1
0
Arginine, N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-
74-79-3
0
1
0
L-Arginine
7440-37-1
1
0
0
Argon
A
7440-38-2
1
1
1
Arsenic
As
15575-20-9
0
1
0
Arsenic, isotope of mass 76
76
7778-44-1
0
1
0
Arsenic acid, calcium salt
Ca3(AsO4)2
7645-25-2
0
1
0
Arsenic acid (H3AsO4), lead salt
Pb3(AsO4)2
XX-6, XXI-3
7784-40-9
0
1
0
Arsenic acid, lead salt (PbHAsO4)
PbHAsO4
XX-6, XXI-3
1327-53-3
0
1
0
Arsenic oxide
As2O3
XX-6
7784-42-1
1
0
0
Arsine
H3As
XX-6
603-32-7
1
0
0
Arsine, triphenyl-
As(C6H5)3
XX-6
50-81-7
1
1
1
L-Ascorbic acid
VIII-3 H2N-C(=NH)-NH-(CH2)3-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7 IV.A-3, IV.B-7 H2N-C(=NH)-NH-(CH2)3-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7 XX-5 XX-5, XXI-3
As
{arsenious oxide}
{L-gulofuranolactone, 3-oxo-}
XX-5 XX-6, XXI-3
II.A-5, VI-3
CH2OH O
HO
O
OH
7006-34-0
1
1
1
Asparagine
70-47-3
0
1
0
L-Asparagine
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
5794-13-8
0
1
0
L-Asparagine monohydrate
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
6899-03-2
1
1
1
Aspartic acid
56-84-8
1
1
1
L-Aspartic acid
2456-73-7
0
1
0
L-Aspartic acid, N-(1H-indol-3-ylacetyl)-
H2N-CO-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7
IV.A-3, IV.B-7 HOOC-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7 IV.A-3, IV.B-7
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1493
11/24/08 1:55:35 PM
1494
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
271-63-6
S
T
S T
1
0
0
Azaindene
1
0
0
7-Azaindole
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
XVII.E-6
N
7
1
5
0
0
7-Azaindole, N-methyl-
0
1
0
Azathymine
XVII.E-6 N
O
503-29-7
1
1
1
Azetidine
34441-14-0
0
1
0
1-Azetidinebutanoic acid, D-[(3-amino-3carboxypropyl)amino]-2-carboxy-, [2S[1[DR*(R*)],2R*]]{nicotianamine}
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
NH O
N H
XVII.A-1
NH
2517-04-6
0
1
0
2-Azetidinecarboxylic acid
55556-98-4
0
1
0
2-Azetidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-
275-51-4
2
3
4
1
XVII.E-6
H N
N
6
Chapter Table
IV.A-3
IV.A-3
1
0
0
Azulene
1
0
0
Azulene, 1,4-dimethyl-7-ethyl-
68038-71-1
0
1
0
Bacillus thuringiensis
7440-39-3
1
1
1
Barium
203-33-8
1
0
0
Benz[a]aceanthrylene
202-33-5
1
0
0
Benz[j]aceanthrylene
COOH
ON
IV.A-3, XV-8
N
{cyclopentacycloheptene}
I.E-6
I.E-6 {Dipel®}
XXI-3 Ba
XX-5 I.E-6
{benzo[a]fluoranthene}
{cholanthrylene}
I.E-6 e
f
g
j
i
h
d c b
a 2
479-23-2
1
0
0
1
I.E-6
Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro- {cholanthrene} e
f
g
j
i
h
d c b
a 2
56-49-5
1
0
0
Benz[j]aceanthrylene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl{3-methylcholanthrene}
1
I.E-6 e
f
g
h
i
j
d H3C
c b
a 2
1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1494
11/24/08 1:55:36 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1495
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
76774-50-0
1
0
0
Benz[fg]acenaphthylene
I.E-6
205-99-2
1
1
1
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene {benzo[b]fluoranthene}
I.E-6
41637-94-9
1
0
0
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene, methyl-
I.E-6
149021-93-2
1
0
0
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene, 10-methyl-
225-11-6
1
0
0
Benz[a]acridine
1
0
0
Benz[a]acridine, 8,10-dimethyl-
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine
225-51-4
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
I.E-6 XVII.E-6
XVII.E-6 7
8
XVII.E-6
6
9
5
10 N
11
4 1
3 2
10567-95-0
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 5,7-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
71265-19-5
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 6,9-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
963-89-3
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 7,9-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
2381-40-0
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 7,10-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
32740-01-5
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 7,11-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
3340-94-1
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 7-methyl-
XVII.E-6
14319-90-5
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 8-methyl-
XVII.E-6
33942-93-7
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 9-methyl-
XVII.E-6
7230-71-9
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 10-methyl-
XVII.E-6
67028-20-0
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 11-methyl-
XVII.E-6
58430-01-6
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 7,9,10-trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
51787-42-9
1
0
0
Benz[c]acridine, 7,9,11-trimethyl-
100-52-7
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde
XVII.E-6 6
CH=O
5 4
III-12
2 3
1620-98-0
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, 3,5-di(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-
33774-71-9
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, dihydroxy-
III-12 III-12, IX-22
24677-78-9
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 2,3-dihydroxy-
III-12, IX-22
95-01-2
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,4-dihydroxy-
III-12, IX-22
1194-98-5
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,5-dihydroxy-
III-12, IX-22
139-85-5
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 3,4-dihydroxy{protocatechualdehyde}
III-12, IX-22
613-45-6
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,4-dimethoxy-
III-12, X-2
4925-88-6
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methyl-
III-12, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1495
11/24/08 1:55:36 PM
1496
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
3392-97-0
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 2,6-dimethoxy-
120-14-9
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 3,4-dimethoxy-
{veratraldehyde}
III-12, X-2
134-96-3
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxy{syringaldehyde}
III-12, IX-22, X-2
15764-16-6
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-
III-12
5779-94-2
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,5-dimethyl-
III-12
100-10-7
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 4-(dimethylamino)-
121-32-4
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 3-ethoxy-4-hydroxy- {ethylvanillin}
53951-50-1
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, ethyl-
III-12
4748-78-1
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, 4-ethyl-
III-12
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table III-12, X-2
III-12, XII-2 III-12, IX-22, X-2
90-02-8
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-
148-53-8
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy-
III-12, IX-22
100-83-4
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-
III-12, IX-22
123-08-0
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-
III-12, IX-22
106799-60-4
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, hydroxymethoxy-
121-33-5
{salicylaldehyde}
III-12, IX-22
III-12, IX-22, X-2
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-, labeled with 14 14 C {vanillin- C}
{vanillin}
III-12, IX-22, X-2 XXV-29
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, hydroxy-methyl-
III-12, IX-22
97122-27-5
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, hydroxy-3-methyl-
III-12, IX-22
57295-30-4
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-4-methyl-
III-12, IX-22 III-12, IX-22
15174-69-3
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, methoxy-
III-12
123-11-5
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 4-methoxy-
1334-78-7
1
0
0
Benzaldehyde, methyl-
{p-anisaldehyde}
III-12, X-2
529-20-4
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 2-methyl-
{o-tolualdehyde}
III-12
620-23-5
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 3-methyl-
{m-tolualdehyde}
III-12
III-12
104-87-0
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 4-methyl-
{p-tolualdehyde}
III-12
122-03-2
1
1
1
Benzaldehyde, 4-(1-methylethyl)- {cuminaldehyde}
III-12
29344-95-4
0
1
0
Benzaldehyde, 2,3,4,5-tetramethyl-
III-12
55-21-0
1
1
1
Benzamide
15310-01-7
0
1
0
Benzamide, 2-iodo-N-phenyl-
C6H5-CO-NH2 {Benodanil®}
XIII-1 XIII-1, XXI-3
I CO-NH-C6H5
1
0
0
Benzanthracene
I.E-6
63194-18-3
1
0
0
Benzanthracene, methyl-
I.E-6
56-55-3
1
1
1
Benz[a]anthracene
{BaA or B[a]A}
1 11
12
8
7
2 3 4
10 9
43178-07-0
I.E-6
5 6
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, alkyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1496
11/24/08 1:55:36 PM
1497
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
57-97-6
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 7,12-dimethyl-
0
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 9,10-dimethylThere can be no such compound as 7,12dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene because, according to the now obsolete nomenclature shown, there was never a 12 position in the 1,2-benzanthracene molecule. Also shown is 7,12dimethylbenz[a]anthracene named according to the current nomenclature.
31632-62-9
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures {DMBA}
I.E-6 CH3 8 9
6
10
4'
2 3
4
5
CH3
3' 1
7
2
2'
1'
11 10
3 a
12
4 b
7
9 8
CH3
1
5
6
c
CH3
I.E-6
Benz[a]anthracene, ethyl-
I.E-6
71265-32-2
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
43178-22-9
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, methyl-
I.E-6
2498-77-3
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
2498-76-2
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
2498-75-1
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
316-49-4
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 4-methyl-
I.E-6
2319-96-2
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 5-methyl-
I.E-6
316-14-3
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 6-methyl-
I.E-6
2381-31-9
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 8-methyl-
I.E-6
2381-16-0
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 9-methyl-
I.E-6
2381-15-9
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 10-methyl-
I.E-6
2422-79-9 71265-33-3
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, 12-methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, methylene-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, propyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, tetramethyl-
I.E-6
60826-78-0
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthracene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
199-94-0
1
0
0
7H-Benz[de]anthracene
2
e
I.E-6
3
1 d
c
4 b
a
7
62-53-3
1
0
0
Benz[a]anthrone
1
1
1
Benzenamine
5
6
III-13
O
{aniline}
XII-2
NH2 6
2 3
5 4
106-40-1
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-bromo-
XII-2, XVIII.B-3
1861-40-1
0
1
0
Benzenamine, N-butyl-2,6-dinitro-N-ethyl-4(trifluoromethyl){Benefin®; Benfluralin®}
NO2 (CH2)3-CH3 F3C
XII-2, XXI-3
N CH2-CH3 NO2
95-51-2
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 2-chloro-
{2-chloroaniline}
XII-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1497
11/24/08 1:55:37 PM
1498
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
106-47-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-chloro-
46175-80-8
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 2-(cyclohexen-1-yl)-
XII-2, XVIII.B-3
95-76-1
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 3,4-dichloro-
99-30-9
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 2,6-dichloro-4-nitro- {Dicloran®)
87-59-2
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2,3-dimethyl-
{2,3-xylidine}
XII-2
95-68-1
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2,4-dimethyl-
{2,4-xylidine}
XII-2
95-78-3
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2,5-dimethyl-
{2,5-xylidine}
XII-2
87-62-7
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2,6-dimethyl-
{2,6-xylidine}
XII-2
95-64-7
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 3,4-dimethyl-
{3,4-xylidine}
40487-42-1
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitro-N-(1ethylpropyl){Pendimethalin®}
XII-2 XII-2, XVIII.B-3 XII-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
XII-2 XII-2, XXI-3
HN-CH(C2H5)2 O2N
NO2
108-69-0
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 3,5-dimethyl-
{3,5-xylidine}
XII-2
611-21-2
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N,2-dimethyl-
XII-2
623-08-5
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N,4-dimethyl-
XII-2
121-69-7
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N,N-dimethyl-
33629-47-9
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N(1-methylpropyl){Butralin®}
XII-2 NO2 (H3C)3C
NH-CH(CH 3)-CH2CH3 NO2
XII-2, XXI-3 33820-53-0
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(1methylethyl){Isopropalin®}
XII-2, XXI-3
NO2 H3C
(CH2)2CH3 N (CH2)2CH3
H3C NO2
1582-09-8
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4(trifluoromethyl){Trifluralin®}
NO2 (CH2)2-CH3 F3C
XII-2, XXI-3
N (CH2)2-CH3 NO2
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 4-ethenyl-
XII-2
578-54-1
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2-ethyl-
XII-2
587-02-0
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 3-ethyl-
XII-2
589-16-2
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-ethyl-
XII-2
103-69-5
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N-ethyl-
1821-38-1
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2-ethyl-N-methyl-
{N-ethylaniline}
C6H5-NH-CH2-CH3
XII-2
XII-2
71265-20-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 3-ethyl-N-methyl-
XII-2
37846-06-3
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-ethyl-N-methyl-
XII-2
94-68-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N-ethyl-2-methyl-
XII-2
102-27-2
0
1
0
Benzenamine, N-ethyl-3-methyl-
XII-2
71265-27-5
1
0
0
Benzenamine, ar-ethyl-ar-methyl-
XII-2
90-04-0
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2-methoxy-
{o-anisidine}
X-2, XII-2
536-90-3
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 3-methoxy-
{m-anisidine}
X-2, XII-2
104-94-9
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-methoxy-
{p-anisidine}
X-2, XII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1498
11/24/08 1:55:37 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1499
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
26915-12-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, ar-methyl-
XII-2
95-53-4
1
1
1
Benzenamine, 2-methyl- {o-toluidine; 2-toluidine}
XII-2
108-44-1
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 3-methyl- {m-toluidine 3-toluidine}
XII-2
106-49-0
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-methyl- {p-toluidine; 4-toluidine}
XII-2
100-61-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N-methyl-
5266-85-3
0
1
0
Benzenamine, 2-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-
1
1
1
Benzenamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-
1
0
0
Benzenamine, (1-methylethyl)-N-(1methylethylphenyl)-
XII-2
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-(1-methylethyl)-N-phenyl-
XII-2
5650-10-2 552-82-9
{N-methylaniline}
C6H5-NH-CH3
XII-2 XII-2 XII-2, XV-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N-methyl-N-phenyl-
XII-2
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N-nitroso-N-phenyl-
XII-2, XV-8
122-39-4
1
0
0
Benzenamine, N-phenyl-
13066-19-8
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 2-(2-phenylethenyl){2-aminostilbene}
14064-37-0
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 3-(2-phenylethenyl)-, (Z)-
XII-2
834-24-2
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 4-(2-phenylethenyl)-
XII-2
71265-28-6
1
0
0
Benzenamine, ar,ar,ar,ar-tetramethyl-
XII-2 XII-2
31093-11-5
1
0
0
Benzenamine, ar,ar,ar-trimethyl-
88-05-1
1
0
0
Benzenamine, 2,4,6-trimethyl-
71-43-2
1
1
1
Benzene
{diphenylamine}
C6H5-NH-C6H5
XII-2 XII-2
{mesitylamine}
XII-2 I.D-1
1 2
6
3
5 4
1
0
0
Benzene, C3-alkyl-
I.D-1
1
0
0
Benzene, C4-alkyl-
I.D-1
1
0
0
Benzene, C5-alkyl-
I.D-1
103-33-3
0
1
0
Benzene, azobis-
C6H5-N=N-C6H5
XVI-1
886-66-8
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,3-butadiyne-1,4-diyl)bis-
C6H5-CŁC-CŁC-C6H5
I.D-1
824-90-8
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-butenyl-
C6H5-CH=CH-(CH2) 2-CH3
I.D-1
104-51-8
1
0
0
Benzene, butyl-
C6H5-(CH2)3-CH3
108-90-7
1
0
0
Benzene, chloro-
C6H5-Cl
22349-74-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-chloro-4-(2-chloro-1-phenylethenyl)-
103-17-3
0
1
0
Benzene, 1-chloro-4-((4-chlorophenyl)methyl)thio){Chlorobenside®}
{azobenzene}
XVIII.B-3 S Cl
3424-82-6
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-chloro-2-[2,2-dichloro-1-(4chlorophenyl)ethenyl]-
53-19-0
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-chloro-2-[2,2-dichloro-1-(4chlorophenyl)ethyl]{o,p’-DDD; o.p’-TDE}
I.D-1 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
XVIII.B-3 XXI-3
XVIII.B-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CHCl 2 Cl
Cl
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1499
11/24/08 1:55:37 PM
1500
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
4329-12-8
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-chloro-3-[2,2-dichloro-1-(4chlorophenyl)ethyl]{m,p’-DDD}
789-02-6
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-chloro-2-[2,2,2-trichloro-1-(4chlorophenyl)ethyl]{o,p’-DDT}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-(chloroethenylidene)bis-
1022-22-6
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,1'-(chloroethenylidene)bis[4-chloro{DDM}
CCl3
XVIII.B-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
Cl
2642-80-0
1
1
1
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
Cl
4541-89-3
Benzene, 1,1'-(2-chloroethylidene)bis[4-chloro{DDMS}
Cl
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
Cl
Cl
622-24-2
0
1
0
Benzene, 2-chloroethyl-
Chapter Table
C6H5-(CH2)2-Cl
XVIII.B-3
0
1
0
Benzene, chloromethoxy-
25167-67-3
1
0
0
Benzene, chloromethyl-
{chloroanisole}
X-2, XVIII.B-3
95-50-1
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,2-dichloro-
XVIII.B-3
541-73-1
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,3-dichloro-
XVIII.B-3
C6H5-CH2-Cl
106-46-7
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,4-dichloro-
72-55-9
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,1'-(dichloroethenylidene)bis[4-chloro{p,p’-DDE}
XVIII.B-3
XVIII.B-3 Cl
Cl
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CCl2
27013-25-8
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-(2,2-dichloroethylidene)bis[chloro-
72-54-8
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,1'-(2,2-dichloroethylidene)bis[4-chloro{p,p’-DDD, p,p’-TDE}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 Cl
Cl
XVIII.B-3
CHCl2
25340-17-4
1
1
1
Benzene, diethyl-
I.D-1
105-05-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,4-diethyl-
I.D-1
25550-13-4
1
0
0
Benzene, diethylmethyl-
I.D-1
27598-81-8
1
0
0
Benzene, dimethoxy-
X-2
91-16-7
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,2-dimethoxy-
{veratrole}
X-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2-dimethoxy-4-ethenyl-
X-2
494-99-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2-dimethoxy-4-methyl-
X-2
151-10-0
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,3-dimethoxy-
X-2
150-78-7
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,4-dimethoxy-
X-2
14753-08-3
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,4-dimethoxy-2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
X-2
1330-20-7
1
1
1
Benzene, dimethyl-
{xylene}
I.D-1
95-47-6
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,2-dimethyl-
{o-xylene}
I.D-1
108-38-3
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,3-dimethyl-
{m-xylene}
I.D-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1500
11/24/08 1:55:38 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1501
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
106-42-3
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-
2039-89-6
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-ethenyl-
I.D-1
934-80-5
{p-xylene}
I.D-1
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2-dimethyl-4-ethyl-
I.D-1
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,3-dimethyl-4-ethyl-
I.D-1
1758-88-9
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-ethyl-
I.D-1
3459-80-1
0
1
0
Benzene, [(1,1-dimethylethoxy)methyl]-
X-2
98-06-6
1
1
1
Benzene, (1,1-dimethylethyl)-
1
0
0
Benzene, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1-methyl-
I.D-1
C6H5-C(CH3)3
I.D-1
644-30-4
0
1
0
Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-
I.D-1
4176-17-4
0
1
0
Benzene, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methyl-, (R)-
I.D-1
99-51-4
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2-dimethyl-4-nitro-
XVI-1
89-58-7
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-nitro{2,5-dimethyl-1-nitrobenzene}
XVI-1
89-87-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 2,4-dimethyl-1-nitro-
XVI-1
1007-26-7
0
1
0
Benzene, (2,2-dimethylpropyl)-
103-29-7
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethanediyl)bis-
588-59-0
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis-
645-49-8
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis-, (Z)-
I.D-1
103-30-0
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis-, (E)-
I.D-1
5121-74-4
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis[4-chloro{DCS = dichlorostilbene}
1657-56-3
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis[4-chloro-, (E){trans-DCS}
2510-74-9
1
0
0
C6H5-CH2-C(CH3)3
I.D-1
{bibenzyl}
C6H5-CH2-CH2-C6H5
I.D-1
{stilbene}
C6H5-CH=CH-C6H5
I.D-1
XVIII.B-3 XVIII.B-3
Cl Cl
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Benzene, 1,1'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis[4-chloro-, (Z){cis-DCS} Cl
{styrene}
C6H5-CH=CH2
Cl
100-42-5
1
1
1
Benzene, ethenyl-
6380-23-0
1
1
1
Benzene, 4-ethenyl-1,2-dimethoxy-
I.D-1
27576-03-0
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenyl-, dimethyl-
I.D-1
28106-30-1
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenylethyl-
I.D-1
71607-81-3
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenylethyldimethyl-
I.D-1
27138-10-9
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenylethylmethyl-
I.D-1
637-69-4
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethenyl-4-methoxy-
X-2
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenylmethyl-
I.D-1
611-15-4
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethenyl-2-methyl-
I.D-1
100-80-1
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethenyl-3-methyl-
I.D-1
X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1501
11/24/08 1:55:38 PM
1502
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
622-97-9
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethenyl-4-methyl-
I.D-1
71607-82-4
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenyltetramethyl-
I.D-1
50976-21-1
1
0
0
Benzene, ethenyltrimethyl-
103-73-1
1
0
0
Benzene, ethoxy-
5076-72-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethoxy-4-methoxy
100-41-4
1
1
1
Benzene, ethyl-
I.D-1 C6H5-O-CH2-CH3
X-2
C6H5-CH2-CH3
I.D-1
X-2
874-41-9
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl-
I.D-1
25550-14-5
1
0
0
Benzene, ethylmethyl-
I.D-1
611-14-3
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-
I.D-1
620-14-4
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-ethyl-3-methyl-
I.D-1
622-96-8
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-ethyl-4-methyl-
I.D-1
18908-70-8
0
1
0
Benzene, 1-ethyl-2-(1-phenylethyl)-
I.D-1
18640-62-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-ethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-
I.D-1 I.D-1
536-74-3
1
0
0
Benzene, ethynyl-
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-(2-hepten-6-yl)-4-methyl-
118-74-1
0
1
0
Benzene, hexachloro-
1077-16-3
1
0
0
Benzene, hexyl-
{phenylacetylene}
I.D-1 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 C6H5-(CH2)5-CH3
I.D-1
622-78-6
0
1
0
Benzene, (isothiocyanatomethyl)-
XVIII.A-1
2257-09-2
0
1
0
Benzene, (2-isothiocyanatoethyl)-
XVIII.A-1
100-66-3
1
1
1
Benzene, methoxy-
{anisole} 14
C6H5-O-CH3
X-2
14
21730-66-5
1
1
1
Benzene, methoxy-, 1- C, labeled with C 14 {anisole-1- C}
X-2
26897-24-5
0
1
0
Benzene, methoxy-methyl- {2 isomers detected}
X-2
538-86-3
0
1
0
Benzene, (methoxymethyl)- {benzyl methyl ether}
X-2
578-58-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methoxy-2-methyl- {o-methylanisole}
X-2
100-84-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methoxy-3-methyl- {m-methylanisole}
X-2
104-93-8
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-methoxy-4-methyl- {p-methylanisole}
X-2
3794-96-5
0
1
0
Benzene, 2-methoxy-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-
X-2
6379-73-3
0
1
0
Benzene, 2-methoxy-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
X-2
1076-56-8
0
1
0
Benzene, 2-methoxy-4-methyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-
X-2
104-46-1
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-
{anethole}
X-2
140-67-0
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)- {estragole}
X-2
104-45-0
0
1
0
Benzene, 1-methoxy-4-propyl- {dihydroanethole}
X-2
16277-67-1
0
1
0
Benzene, (3-methoxy-1-propenyl)-
X-2
108-88-3
1
1
1
Benzene, methyl-
101-81-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-methylenebis- {diphenylmethane}
101-76-8
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-methylenebis[4-chloro-
{toluene}
C6H5-CH3
I.D-1
C6H5-CH2-C6H5
I.D-1 XVIII.B-3
Cl
Cl
98-83-9
1
0
0
Benzene, (1-methylethenyl)- {D-methylstyrene}
C6H5-C(CH3)=CH2
I.D-1
98-82-8
1
1
1
Benzene, (1-methylethyl)-
C6H5-CH=(CH3)2
I.D-1
{cumene}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1502
11/24/08 1:55:38 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1503
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1817-47-6
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-(1-methylethyl)-4-nitro- {4-nitrocumen}
1124-20-5
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methylethenyl)-
I.D-1
1195-32-0
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl){p,Į-dimethylstyrene}
I.D-1
535-77-3
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)- {m-cymene}
I.D-1
99-87-6
1
1
1
Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)- {p-cymene}
I.D-1
88-72-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-2-nitro-
XVI-1
99-08-1
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-nitro-
XVI-1
99-99-0
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-4-nitro-
XVI-1
17271-70-4
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(1-propenyl)-
I.D-1
1074-43-7
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-propyl-
I.D-1
1074-55-1
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-4-propyl-
I.D-1
538-93-2
1
0
0
Benzene, (2-methylpropyl)-
1139-49-7
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-3-(2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexyl){toluene, m-(2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexyl}
Selected structures
Chapter Table XVI-1
C6H5-CH2-CH(CH3)2 CH3
I.D-1 I.D-1
CH3
H3C CH3
16982-00-6
0
1
0
Benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1,2,2-trimethylcyclopentyl)-, (R)-
98-95-3
1
0
0
Benzene, nitro-
15457-05-3
0
1
0
Benzene, 2-nitro-1-(4-nitrophenoxy)-4(trifluoromethyl){Fluorodifen®}
82-68-8
0
1
0
Benzene, nitropentachloro-
CH3
CH3
H3C
C6H5-NO2
1
0
0
Benzene, octyl-
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,1'-oxybis-
103-50-4
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-[oxybis(methylene)]bis{dibenzyl ether}
55044-97-8
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,1'-[oxybis(methylene)]bis[4-ethyl-
538-68-1
1
1
1
Benzene, pentyl-
637-50-3
1
0
0
Benzene, 1-propenyl-
300-57-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 2-propenyl-
103-65-1
1
1
1
673-32-5
1
0
0
{diphenyl ether}
XVI-1 XVI-1, XXI-3
{Quintocen®}
101-84-8
I.D-1
CH3
XVI-1 C6H5-(CH2)7-CH3
I.D-1
C6H5-O-C6H5
X-2
C6H5-CH2-O-CH2-C6H5
X-2 X-2
C6H5-(CH2)4-CH3
I.D-1
C6H5-CH=CH-CH3
I.D-1
C6H5-CH2-CH=CH2
I.D-1
Benzene, propyl-
C6H5-(CH2)2-CH3
I.D-1
Benzene, 1-propynyl-
C6H5-CŁC-CH3
I.D-1
{allyl benzene}
938-22-7
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetrachloro-4-methoxy-
25619-60-7
1
1
1
Benzene, tetramethyl-
I.D-1
488-23-3
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2,3,4-tetramethyl-
I.D-1
527-53-7
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2,3,5-tetramethyl-
I.D-1
95-93-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethyl-
I.D-1
116-29-0
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,2,4-trichloro-5-((4chlorophenyl)sulfonyl)-
{Tetradifon®}
X-2, XVIII.B-3
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1503
11/24/08 1:55:39 PM
1504
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
50-29-3
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) Benzene, 1,1'-(2,2,2-trichloroethylidene)bis[4chloro{p,p’-DDT}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CCl3
Cl
Cl
87-40-1 634-36-6
0
1
0
Chapter Table
Selected structures
Benzene, 1,3,5-trichloro-2-methoxy-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethoxy-
X-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethoxy-
X-2
1
0
0
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethoxy-
X-2
487-11-6
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethoxy-5-(2-propenyl)-
X-2
2883-98-9
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethoxy-5-(2-propenyl)-, (Z)-
X-2
5273-86-9
0
1
0
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethoxy-5-(2-propenyl)-, (E)-
X-2
25551-13-7
1
1
1
Benzene, trimethyl-
I.D-1
526-73-8
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl-
95-63-6
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl-
I.D-1
108-67-8
1
1
1
Benzene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-
122-78-1
1
1
1
Benzeneacetaldehyde
4411-89-6
1
1
1
Benzeneacetaldehyde, D-ethylidene{2-phenyl-2-butenal}
57568-60-2
0
1
0
Benzeneacetaldehyde, D-(2-furanylmethylene)-
III-12, X-2
5031-83-4
0
1
0
Benzeneacetaldehyde, D-(2-phenylethylidene)-
III-12
0
1
0
Benzeneacetaldehyde, 4-methyl-
III-12
{pseudocumene}
I.D-1
{mesitylene}
I.D-1
{phenylacetaldehyde}
103-81-1
1
1
1
Benzeneacetamide
4695-13-0
0
1
0
Benzeneacetamide, D-phenyl-
{phenylacetamide}
957-51-7
1
1
1
Benzeneacetamide, N,N-dimethyl-D-phenyl{diphenamid; Enide®}
III-12
CH2-CH=O
III-12
C6H5-CH2-CO-NH2
XIII-1
(C6H5)2=CH-CO-NH2
XIII-1 XIII-1, XXI-3
CH3 N
CH3
O
954-21-2
1
1
1
XIII-1, XXI-3
Benzeneacetamide, N-methyl-D-phenyl{desmethyl diphenamid}
CH3 N-H O
103-82-2
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid
{phenylacetic acid}
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, labeled with C 14 {phenylacetic acid- C}
122-43-0
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, butyl ester
17119-15-2
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, D,3-dihydroxy-
1198-84-1
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, D,4-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, XXI-3
CH2-COOH
14
IV.A-3, XXV-29 C6H5-CH2-COO-(CH2)3-CH3 HO
CH2OH-COOH
V-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3, IX.A-22
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1504
11/24/08 1:55:39 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1505
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, D,?-dihydroxy-ethyl-
20432-26-2
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, D-ethylidene-, (E)-
90-64-2
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, D-hydroxy-
{mandelic acid} {hydratropic acid}
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
492-37-5
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, D-methyl-
19988-45-5
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
IV.A-3
451-13-8
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
102-32-9
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
4670-09-1
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 3,5-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-42-7
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, ar,ar-dihydroxy-ar,ar-dimethyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-37-0
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, ar,D-dihydroxy-ar-ethyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-48-3
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, ar,ar-dihydroxy-ar-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-41-6
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-ar-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
614-75-5
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, 2-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
621-37-4
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, 3-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
51630-58-1
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 4-chloro- Į-(1-methylethyl)-, cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Fenvalerate®}
O
COO-CH(CN)Cl
V-3, X-2, XI-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 70124-77-5
0
1
0
F
Benzeneacetic acid, 4-(difluoromethoxy)-Į-(1methylethyl)-, cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester
O
F
{Flucythrinate®} CH3
O
O CN
O
CH3
V-3, X-2, XI-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22
156-38-7
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, 4-hydroxy-
306-08-1
1
0
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy{homovanillic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
102-22-7
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester {geranyl phenylacetate}
V-3
101-97-3
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, ethyl ester {ethyl phenylacetate}
C6H5-CH2-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
5421-17-0
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, hexyl ester
C6H5-CH2-COO-(CH2)5-CH3
V-3
101-41-7
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, methyl ester {methyl phenylacetate}
C6H5-CH2-COO-CH3
V-3
102-19-2
1
1
1
Benzeneacetic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester
V-3
101-94-0
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 4-methylphenyl ester {p-tolyl phenylacetate}
V-3
102-13-6
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester
V-3
102-20-5
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester
C6H5-CH2-COO-(CH2)2-C6H5
V-3
102-16-9
0
1
0
Benzeneacetic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl phenylacetate}
C6H5-CH2-COO-CH2-C6H5
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1505
11/24/08 1:55:39 PM
1506
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
140-29-4
1
1
1
Benzeneacetonitrile
14191-95-8
1
0
0
Benzeneacetonitrile, 4-hydroxy-
IX.A-22, XI-2
21850-61-3
1
0
0
Benzeneacetonitrile, 4-hydroxy-D-methyl-
IX.A-22, XI-2
1
0
0
Benzeneacetonitrile, methyl-
XI-2
1
0
0
Benzeneacetonitrile, 2-methyl-
XI-2
1
0
0
Benzeneacetonitrile, 4-methyl-
0
1
0
Benzenebutanoic acid, D,2-diamino-J-oxo{kynurenine}
22364-68-7 343-65-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
{benzyl cyanide}
CH2-CN
Chapter Table XI-2
XI-2 O
III-13, IV.A-3, XII-2
NH2 COOH
NH2
53392-07-7
1
0
0
Benzenebutanol, 4-methyl-
II.A-5
71607-71-1
1
0
0
Benzenediamine, N-methyl-
95-54-5
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediamine
3171-45-7
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediamine, 4,5-dimethyl-
XII-2
25376-45-8
XII-2 {o-phenylenediamine}
XII-2
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediamine, ar-methyl-
XII-2
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediamine, N-methyl-
XII-2
101-54-2
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediamine, N-phenyl-
140-56-7
0
1
0
Benzenediazosulfonate, dimethylamino-, sodium salt {Fenaminosulf®}
91-15-6
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenedicarbonitrile
XII-2 XX-6, XXI-3 XI-2
626-17-5
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenedicarbonitrile
1897-45-6
0
1
0
1,3-Benzenedicarbonitrile, 2,4,5,6-tetrachloro {Chlorothalonil®}
XI-2 CN Cl
Cl
Cl
XI-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CN Cl
623-26-7
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenedicarbonitrile
88-99-3
1
1
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid
XI-2
121-91-5
1
0
0
100-21-0
1
1
1
7299-89-0
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylbutyl) ester
V-3
117-81-7
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester
V-3
131-20-4 27554-26-3
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(6-methylheptyl) ester {diisooctyl phthalate}
V-3
84-69-5
0
1
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester
V-3
85-69-8
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl, 2-ethylhexyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl, 2-methylbutyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl, 3-methylbutyl ester
V-3
{phthalic acid}
IV.A-3
1,3-Benzenedicarboxylic acid
{isophthalic acid}
IV.A-3
1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid
{terephthalic acid}
IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1506
11/24/08 1:55:40 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1507
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
0
1
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl, phenylmethyl ester
V-3
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dialkyl ester {four isomers detected}
V-3
84-74-2
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dibutyl ester {dibutyl phthalate}
V-3
84-66-2
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diethyl ester {diethyl phthalate}
V-3
CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
84-75-3
0
1
0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dihexyl ester
V-3
131-11-3
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester {dimethyl phthalate}
V-3
117-84-0
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dioctyl ester
V-3
131-16-8
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, dipropyl ester
1861-32-1
0
1
0
1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-, dimethyl ester {DCPA®}
1
0
0
Benzenediol, C2-alkyl-
71630-70-1 80934-44-7
1
0
0
Benzenediol, C3-alkyl-
1
0
0
Benzenediol, ethyl-nitro-
V-3 V-3, XXI-3 IX.A-22 IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1
1
0
0
Benzenediol, methyl-
1
0
0
Benzenediol, methyl-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
IX.A-22
62726-14-1
1
0
0
Benzenediol, nitro{at least 4 isomers were detected}
IX.A-22, XVI-1
120-80-9
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenediol
{catechol; pyrocatechol}
IX.A-22
OH OH
6 5
3 4
69845-49-4
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, dimethyl-
IX.A-22
2785-75-3
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3,5-dimethyl-
IX.A-22
2785-78-6
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3,6-dimethyl-
IX.A-22
98-29-3
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
6053-02-7
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
28930-20-3
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, ethyl-
IX.A-22
933-99-3
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-ethyl-
IX.A-22
1124-39-6
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-ethyl-
IX.A-22
71608-02-1
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 5-ethyl-3-nitro-
934-00-9
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-methoxy-
28930-19-0
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, methyl-
IX.A-22
488-17-5
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-methyl-
IX.A-22
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX-22, X-2
452-86-8
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-methyl-
IX.A-22
2138-48-9
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
IX.A-22
2138-43-4
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
102-29-4
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, monoacetate
6665-98-1
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-nitro-
IX.A-22 V-3, IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1507
11/24/08 1:55:40 PM
1508
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
3316-09-4
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-nitro-
1126-61-0
1
1
1
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-(2-propenyl)-
29031-84-3
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, propyl-
IX.A-22
2896-63-1
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 3-propyl-
IX.A-22
Name (per CA Collective Index)
2525-02-2
1
0
0
1,2-Benzenediol, 4-propyl-
108-46-3
1
1
1
1,3-Benzenediol
Selected structures
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22
IX.A-22 {resorcinol}
IX.A-22
OH 2
6 5
OH
4
25377-27-9 67965-47-3 2896-60-8 608-25-3 504-15-4 71608-03-2
Chapter Table
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, dimethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, 2,5-dimethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, ethenyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, ethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, 4-ethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, methyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, 2-methyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, 5-methyl-
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, (1-methylethyl)-
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, 4-methyl-6-nitro-
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, monoacetate
{orcinol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1 V-3, IX.A-22
3163-07-3
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, 4-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
68146-94-1
1
0
0
1,3-Benzenediol, propyl-
IX.A-22
123-31-9
1
1
1
1,4-Benzenediol
{hydroquinone}
IX.A-22
OH 6
2
5
3
OH
1 3233-32-7
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, dimethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, monoacetate
V-3, IX-22
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, monopropanoate
V-3, IX-22
608-43-5
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2,3-dimethyl-
IX.A-22
615-90-7
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2,5-dimethyl-
IX.A-22
2349-70-4
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2-ethyl- = 1,4-Benzenediol, ethyl-
IX.A-22
72693-14-2
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-
IX.A-22
3233-32-7
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, monoacetate
V-3, IX-22
824-46-4
1
1
1
1,4-Benzenediol, 2-methoxy-
IX-22, X-2
95-71-6
1
1
1
1,4-Benzenediol, 2-methyl- = 1,4-Benzenediol, methyl-
IX.A-22
2349-71-5
0
1
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2-(1-methylethyl)-
IX.A-22
4693-31-6
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2-propyl-
IX.A-22
700-13-0
1
0
0
1,4-Benzenediol, 2,3,5-trimethyl-
IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1508
11/24/08 1:55:40 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1509
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
64-04-0
1
1
1
Benzeneethanamine
C6H5-CH2-CH2-NH2
XII-2
582-22-9
1
0
0
Benzeneethanamine, E-methyl-
C6H5-CH(CH3)-CH2-NH2
XII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
589-08-2
1
1
1
Benzeneethanamine, N-methyl-
C6H5-CH2-CH2-NH-CH3
60-12-8
1
1
1
Benzeneethanol {phenethyl alcohol} Occasionally listed as 1321-27-3 Ethanol, phenyl-
C6H5-CH2CH2-OH
5040-23-3
1
0
0
Benzeneethanol, D,4-dimethyl-
Chapter Table
XII-2 II.A-5 II.A-5
7779-78-4
0
1
0
Benzeneethanol, D-(2-methylpropyl)-
13398-94-2
1
1
1
Benzeneethanol, 3-hydroxy-
II.A-5 II.A-5, IX.A-22
501-94-0
1
1
1
Benzeneethanol, 4-hydroxy-
2380-78-1
1
0
0
Benzeneethanol, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-
II.A-5, IX.A-22
699-02-5
0
1
0
Benzeneethanol, 4-methyl-
100-46-9
1
1
1
Benzenemethanamine
62924-70-3
0
1
0
Benzenemethanamine, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dinitro-4(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-N-ethyl-6-fluoro{Flumetralin®}
100-51-6
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol
1197-01-9
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol, D,D,4-trimethyl-
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2 II.A-5
{benzylamine}
{benzyl alcohol}
C6H5-CH2-NH2
XII-2
XII-2, XVI-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
C6H5-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5
{p,D,D-trimethylbenzyl alcohol} 617-94-7
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol, D,D-dimethyl-
C6H5-C(CH3)2OH
II.A-5
536-50-5
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, D,4-dimethyl-
4393-06-0
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, D-ethenyl-
C6H5-CH(CH=CH2)OH
II.A-5
93-54-9
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, D-ethyl- {1-phenyl-1-propanol}
C6H5-CH(C2H5)OH
II.A-5
98-85-1
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol, D-methyl-
C6H5-CH(CH3)OH
II.A-5
93-92-5
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, D-methyl-, acetate
13651-14-4
1
0
0
Benzenemethanol, 2,3-dimethyl-
II.A-5
89-95-2
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
II.A-5
V-3
620-24-6
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol, 3-hydroxy-
105-13-5
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-
{anisyl alcohol}
II.A-5, IX.A-22 II.A-5, X-2
104-21-2
1
1
1
Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, acetate {anisyl acetate}
V-3, X-2
122-91-8
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, formate
V-3, X-2
102-17-0
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, phenylacetate
V-3, X-2
7549-33-9
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, 4-methoxy-, propanoate
V-3, X-2
589-18-4
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, 4-methyl-
II.A-5
6282-37-7
1
0
0
Benzenemethanol, 4-methyl-D-propyl-
II.A-5
1331-81-3
0
1
0
Benzenemethanol, ar-methoxy-
27043-34-1
1
0
0
Benzenemethanol, methyl-
104-53-0
0
1
0
Benzenepropanal
80638-48-8
1
0
0
Benzenepropanal, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-
103-95-3
0
1
0
Benzenepropanal, Į-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl){cyclamen aldehyde}
102-93-2
1
1
1
Benzenepropanamide
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5 C6H5-CH2CH2-CH=O
III-12 III-12, IX.A-22, X-2 III-12
C6H5-CH2CH2-CONH2
XIII-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1509
11/24/08 1:55:41 PM
1510
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
121850-61-1
0
1
0
Benzenepropanamide, N-[3-[[4-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2propenyl]amino]butyl]amino ]propyl]-3,4-dihydroxy-
645-59-0
1
0
0
Benzenepropanenitrile
C6H5-CH2CH2-CN
501-52-0
1
1
1
Benzenepropanoic acid {3-phenylpropionic acid or hydrocinnamic acid}
C6H5-CH2CH2-COOH
156-06-8
0
1
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, D-hydroxy{phenyllactic acid}
C6H5-CH2-CH2OH-COOH
7326-19-4
0
1
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, D-hydroxy-, (R)-
4593-90-2
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, E-methyl-
156-06-9
0
1
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, D-oxo{phenylpyruvic acid}
24696-05-7
0
1
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, dihydroxy-methoxy-
1
1
1
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2-(methylnitrosamino)-
3714-73-6
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-38-1
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-ar-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
10538-47-3
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-34-7
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy-ar-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
IX.A-22, XIII-1
XI-2 IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 IV.A-3
C6H5-CH2-CO-COOH
IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
IV.A-3, X-2, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, XV-8
495-78-3
1
1
1
Benzenepropanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
1078-61-1
1
1
1
Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy{dihydrocaffeic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96961-47-6
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-2,5,6trimethyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-33-6
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-ar-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
621-54-5
1
1
1
Benzenepropanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
501-97-3
1
1
1
Benzenepropanoic acid, 4-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
156-39-8
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 4-hydroxy-D-oxo-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
5597-50-2
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 4-hydroxy-, methyl ester
V-3, IX.A-22
1135-23-5
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy{hydroferulic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
96937-36-9
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, ar,ar-dihydroxy-armethoxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
96937-35-8
1
0
0
Benzenepropanoic acid, ar,ar-dihydroxy-ar-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
122-97-4
1
1
1
Benzenepropanol
C6H5-CH2-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5
1992-50-3
1
0
0
Benzenepropanol, D-ethyl-
{3-phenyl-1-propanol}
C6H5-CH2-CH2-CH(C2H5)OH
II.A-5
2845-25-2
1
0
0
Benzenepropanol, J-ethyl-, (S)-
C6H5-CH(C2H5)-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5
10210-17-0
1
0
0
Benzenepropanol, 4-hydroxy-
19044-88-3
0
1
0
Benzenesulfonamide, 4-(dipropylamino)-3,5-dinitro{Oryzalin®}
II.A-5, IX.A-22
108-98-5
1
0
0
Benzenethiol
87-66-1
1
1
1
1,2,3-Benzenetriol
{phenyl mercaptan} {pyrogallol}
XVI-1, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 C6H5-SH
XVIII.A-1 IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1510
11/24/08 1:55:41 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1511
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 533-73-3 51-17-2
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
1,2,4-Benzenetriol
1
0
0
1,2,4-Benzenetriol, methyl-
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole
Selected structures
{hydroxyhydroquinone}
Chapter Table IX.A-22 IX.A-22 XVII.E-6
N N H
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, C2-alkyl-
XVII.E-6
5851-44-5
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 2-butyl-
XVII.E-6
72692-74-1
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
2876-08-6
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 1,2-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
72692-75-2
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
30304-58-6
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, methyl-
XVII.E-6
1632-83-3
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 1-methyl-
XVII.E-6
615-15-6
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
946-18-9
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 2-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.E-6
82326-40-7
1
0
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 2-(2-naphthalenylmethyl)-
XVII.E-6
148-79-8
1
1
1
1H-Benzimidazole, 2-(4-thiazolyl){Thiabendazole®}
3363-56-2
0
1
0
1H-Benzimidazole, 2,5,6-trimethyl-
10605-21-7
0
1
0
1H-Benzimidazole-2-carbamic acid, methyl ester {Carbendazim®}
XVIII.A-1
N
N S
N H
XVII.E-6 V-3, XXI-3
H N NH-COO-CH3 N
17804-35-2
0
1
0
1H-Benzimidazole-2-carbamic acid, 1(butylcarbamomyl)-, methyl ester {Benomyl®}
CO-NH-C4H9 N
V-3, XXI-3
NH-COO-CH3 N
232-54-2
1
0
0
1H-Benz[e]indene
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Benz[e]indene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Benz[e]indene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
64031-90-9
1
0
0
1H-Benz[e]indene, methyl-
I.E-6
268-40-6
1
0
0
1H-Benz[f]indene
I.E-6
60826-71-3
1
0
0
1H-Benz[f]indene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
71265-34-4
1
0
0
1H-Benz[f]indene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
60826-63-3
1
0
0
1H-Benz[f]indene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzocarbazole
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzocarbazole, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzocarbazole, methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[a]carbazole
XVII.E-6
239-01-0
N H
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1511
11/24/08 1:55:42 PM
1512
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
243-28-7
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
XVII.E-6
5H-Benzo[b]carbazole
N H
205-25-4
1
0
0
XVII.E-6
7H-Benzo[c]carbazole
N H
214-17-5
1
0
0
Benzo[b]chrysene
{dibenzo[b,h]phenanthrene}
146506-80-1
1
0
0
Benzo[g]chrysene, methyl-
I.E-6
7099-43-6
1
0
0
1H-Benzo[a]cyclopent[h]anthracene, 2,3-dihydro{5,6-cyclopentano-1,2-benzanthracene, 2,3dihydro-}
I.E-6
7099-42-5
1
0
0
9H-Benzo[a]cyclopent[i]anthracene, 10,11-dihydro{6,7-cyclopentano-1,2-benzanthracene, 9,10dihydro-}
I.E-6
3811-49-2
0
1
0
4H-1,3,2-Benzodioxaphosphorin-2-sulfide, 2methoxy{Salithion®}
I.E-6
P
OCH3
O
51-03-6
0
1
0
X-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
S O
1,3-Benzodioxole, 5-[[2-(2butoxyethoxy)ethoxy]methyl]-6-propyl{piperonyl butoxide}
O
O
O
O
[
]
(CH2)3-CH3
2
(CH2)2-CH3
X-2, XXI-3 607-91-0
1
1
1
1,3-Benzodioxole, 4-methoxy-6-(2-propenyl){myristicin}
4
94-59-7
0
1
0
1,3-Benzodioxole, 5-(2-propenyl)-
1
1
1
1,3-Benzodioxole-5-carboxaldehyde {piperonal; heliotropin}
O 3
5
H2C=CH=CH2
120-57-0
X-2
OCH3
6
1
CH2
O
7
{safrole}
X-2 4
3
O
III-12, X-2
CH=O
5
2
O 1
56832-73-6
16135-81-2 42126-84-1
1
0
0
Benzofluoranthene
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzofluoranthene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzofluoranthene, ethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzofluoranthene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[cd]fluoranthene
10
I.E-6
11
9
1
6
3
8 2
7
5
4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1512
11/24/08 1:55:42 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1513
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
203-12-3
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene
e
Chapter Table I.E-6
f g
d c b a
i
h
64760-14-1
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, dimethyl-
71265-35-5
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, ethyl-
I.E-6
51001-44-6
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, methyl-
I.E-6
71265-21-9
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
71265-22-0
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
71265-23-1
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
71265-24-2
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]fluoranthene, 4-methyl{also known as 7-methylbenzo[ghi]fluoranthene}
I.E-6
205-82-3
1
0
0
Benzo[j]fluoranthene
I.E-6
60826-67-7
1
0
0
Benzo[j]fluoranthene, methyl-
I.E-6
207-08-9
1
0
0
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
I.E-6
41637-93-8
1
0
0
Benzo[k]fluoranthene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzofluorene
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzofluorene, alkyl-
I.E-6
77271-50-2
1
0
0
Benzofluorene, dimethyl{at least three isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
60918-47-0
1
0
0
Benzofluorene, methyl{at least four isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
77271-51-3
1
0
0
Benzofluorene, tetramethyl{at least two isomers in MSS}
I.E-6 I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzofluorene, trimethyl-
30777-18-5
1
0
0
Benzo[a]fluorene
238-79-9
1
0
0
5H-Benzo[a]fluorene
I.E-6
I.E-6 1 11
10
3 a
9
4
b 8
238-84-6
1
0
0
5
6
7
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene
I.E-6
2
I.E-6
2
1 11
10
3
9
4 8
7
6
5
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
60826-64-4
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene, methyl-
I.E-6
71265-25-3
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene, 11-methyl-
I.E-6
71607-85-7
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[a]fluorene, trimethyl{at least three isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
30777-19-6
1
0
0
5H-Benzo[b]fluorene
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1513
11/24/08 1:55:42 PM
1514
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
243-17-4
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
11H-Benzo[b]fluorene
11
10
I.E-6
1 2
a
9
b 8
3
6
7
4
5
60826-65-5
205-12-9
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[b]fluorene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[b]fluorene, 9-methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzo[c]fluorene, methyl-
1
0
0
7H-Benzo[c]fluorene
I.E-6 7
8
I.E-6
6 a
9 c
10
b
5
11
4
1 3
2
60826-66-6
Chapter Table
1
0
0
7H-Benzo[c]fluorene, methyl-
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[c]fluorene
I.E-6 7
8
I.E-6
6 a
9 c
10
b
5
11
4
1 2
1
0
0
11H-Benzo[c]fluoren-11-one
3
III-13
O
271-89-6
1
0
0
Benzofuran
{benzo[b]furan; coumarone}
7
2
5
3
4
25586-39-4
1
0
0
Benzofuran, dimethyl-
X-2
O
6
X-2
{3 isomers detected}
58924-34-8
1
0
0
Benzofuran, ethyl-
X-2
71265-37-7
1
0
0
Benzofuran, ethyldimethyl-
X-2
25586-38-3
1
0
0
Benzofuran, methyl-
13054-97-2
1
0
0
Benzofuran, octahydro-
X-2
71265-38-8
1
0
0
Benzofuran, pentamethyl-
X-2
36618-49-2
1
0
0
Benzofuran, tetramethyl-
X-2
36541-17-0
1
0
0
Benzofuran, trimethyl-
X-2
X-2
{3 isomers detected}
496-16-2
1
1
1
Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro-
71265-36-6
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydromethyl-
{coumaran}
X-2
1746-11-6
0
1
0
Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro-2-methyl-
X-2
3782-00-1
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 2,3-dimethyl-
X-2
28715-26-6
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 2,3-dimethyl-
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 2,3,3a,4,5,7a-hexahydro-4,4,7atrimethyl-
X-2
X-2 4 3a
5
7a
6 7
4265-25-2 17059-52-8
X-2
3 2
O
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 2-methyl-
X-2
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 3-ethyl-
X-2
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 5-methyl-
X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1514
11/24/08 1:55:43 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1515
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 494-90-6
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-3,6-dimethyl-
1
0
0
Benzofuran, 4-hydroxy-5,6-dimethyl-
X-2
60026-12-2
1
1
1
Benzofuran, 5-hydroxy-6,7-dimethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
35355-35-2
0
1
0
Benzofuran, 5-methoxy-6,7-dimethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
16655-82-6
1
1
1
3,7-Benzofurandiol, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-, 7(methylcarbamate) {3-Hydroxycarbofuran®}
IX.A-22, X-2
II.A-5, V-3, X-2, XXI-3
OOC-NH-CH3 O
CH3 CH3 OH
1
0
0
1,3-Benzofurandione, 5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-
III-13, VII-1
31297-30-0
1
0
0
2,3-Benzofurandione, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimethyl-
III-13, VI-3
19355-58-9
0
1
0
2,6-Benzofurandione, 4,5,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7atrimethyl-
73051-72-6
0
1
0
2-Benzofuranmethanol, 2,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-6hydroxy-D,4,4,7a-tetramethyl-
0
1
0
6-Benzofuranol, 4,5,7,7a-tetrahydro-2-(1hydroxyethyl)-4,4,7a- trimethyl-
3
7a
6
O
III-13, VI-3
3a
4
5
2
1
O
O
7
II.A-5 H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3 OH CH3
O
HO
CH3
39815-67-3
0
1
0
6-Benzofuranol, octahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-
7a
6
HO
1563-66-2
26225-79-6
1
0
1
1
1
0
7-Benzofuranol, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-, methylcarbamate = Methylcarbamic acid, 2,3dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7-benzofuranyl ester {Furadan®; Carbofuran®}
3a
4
5
II.A-5, X-2 3 2
1
O
7
X-2, XXI-3
OOC-NH-CH3 O
CH3 CH3
7-Benzofuranol, 2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-2-ethoxy-, methanesulfonate {Ethofumesate®}
O O-C2H5 H3C-SO2-O
13341-72-5
X-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
0
1
0
Benzofuranone, dimethyltetrahydro-
VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Benzofuranone
VI-3
61892-48-6
1
0
0
2(3H)-Benzofuranone, hexahydro-3a-hydroxy-
16778-27-1
1
1
1
2(3H)-Benzofuranone, hexahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl{mariolide; dihydroactinidiolide}
II.A-5, VI-3 5
7a
6 7
VI-3
3
4
2 1
O
O
37531-06-9
0
1
0
2(3H)-Benzofuranone, hexahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (Z)-
VI-3
37531-07-0
0
1
0
2(3H)-Benzofuranone, hexahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (E)-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Benzofuranone, octahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl{tetrahydroactinidiolide}
VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1515
11/24/08 1:55:43 PM
1516
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
19432-09-8
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
2(3H)-Benzofuranone, 3a,4,5,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7atrimethyl-, cis-
Chapter Table VI-3
O O
75840-26-5
0
1
0
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6-dihydro-3,6-dimethyl-
VI-3
17063-17-1
0
1
0
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,7a-dihydro-4,4,7atrimethyl-, (R)-
VI-3
82395-89-9
0
1
0
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 6-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (6S-Z)-
VI-3
10481-90-0
0
1
0
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 6-hydroxy-5,6,7,7atetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, Z-(r){loliolide}
VI-3
5989-02-6
1
1
1
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 6-hydroxy-5,6,7,7atetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (6S-Z)-
VI-3
38725-47-2
0
1
0
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-
VI-3
15356-74-8
1
1
1
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7atrimethyl-
VI-3
17092-92-1
1
1
1
2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7atrimethyl-, (R)-
VI-3
124052-02-4
0
1
0
3(2H)-Benzofuranone, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)2,4,6-trihydroxy-
117769-21-8
0
1
0
5(4H)-Benzofuranone, 2,7a-dihydro-2-(1hydroxyethyl)-4,4-dimethyl-
39815-70-8
0
1
0
6(2H)-Benzofuranone, hexahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-
III-13, IX.A-22 III-13, VI-3, X-2
6
0
1
0
6(2H)-Benzofuranone, 4,5,7,7a-tetrahydro-2-(1hydroxyethyl)-4,4,7a-trimethyl-
3 2
7
O
70875-03-5
III-13, X-2
4
5
O
2
6
O
39815-73-1
0
1
0
65-85-0
1
1
1
6(2H)-Benzofuranone, 4,5,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7atrimethylBenzoic acid {benzenecarboxylic acid}
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
3
4
5
O
7
OH
III-13, X-2 6
COOH
5 4
IV.A-3
2 3
136-60-7
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, butyl ester
96937-46-1
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, dihydroxy-dimethyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-47-2
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, dihydroxy-ethyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
96937-44-9
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, dimethyl-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
93-89-0
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, ethyl ester
96937-43-8
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, ethyl-hydroxy-
C6H5-COO-(CH2)3-CH3
{ethyl benzoate}
C6H5-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
V-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22
6789-88-4
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, hexyl ester
87323-67-9
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, hydroxy-methoxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
28965-86-8
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, hydroxy-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, methyl-
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, methyl ester
{methyl benzoate} {amyl benzoate}
93-58-3 2049-96-9
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, pentyl ester
93-99-2
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, phenyl ester
C6H5-COO-(CH2)5-CH3
{toluic acid}
V-3
IV.A-3 C6H5-COO-CH3
V-3
C6H5-COO-(CH2)4-CH3
V-3
C6H5-COO-C6H5
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1516
11/24/08 1:55:43 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1517
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
120-51-4
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl benzoate}
C6H5-COO-CH2-C6H5
V-3
2315-68-6
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, propyl ester
C6H5-COO-(CH2)2-CH3
V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
532-32-1
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, sodium salt
118-92-3
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-amino-
XX-6
134-20-3
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-amino-, methyl ester {methyl anthranilate}
612-19-1
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2-ethyl-
10366-91-3
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
612-20-4
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
85-91-6
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-(methylamino)-, methyl ester
69-72-7
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-
{salicylic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
118-61-6
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ethyl ester {ethyl salicylate}
V-3, IX.A-22
6259-76-3
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, hexyl ester
V-3, IX.A-22
119-36-8
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, methyl ester {methyl salicylate}
V-3, IX.A-22
87-20-7
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl salicylate}
V-3, IX.A-22
87-19-4
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 2-methylpropyl ester {isobutyl salicylate}
V-3, IX.A-22
118-55-8
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 2-phenylethyl ester {phenethyl salicylate}
V-3, IX.A-22
118-58-1
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl salicylate}
V-3, IX.A-22
50-85-1
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-
IV.A-3, XII-2 V-3 IV.A-3
V-3
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
579-75-9
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-methoxy-
{o-anisic acid}
IV.A-3, X-2
118-90-1
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 2-methyl-
{o-toluic acid}
IV.A-3
94-47-3
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester {2-phenylethyl benzoate}
V-3
583-04-0
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 2-propenyl ester
303-38-8
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-
3934-81-4
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-4-methoxy-
3929-89-3
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-4-methyl-
V-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2 IV.A-3, IX.A-22
603-79-2
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-
610-02-6
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,3,4-trihydroxy-
IV.A-3
89-86-1
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxy-
{E-resorcylic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
{gentisic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, XXI-3
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
490-79-9
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy-
96937-49-4
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxy-methyl-
610-72-0
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 2,5-dimethyl-
303-07-1
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 2,6-dihydroxy-
619-20-5
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3-ethyl-
99-06-9
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 3-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1517
11/24/08 1:55:44 PM
1518
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
19438-10-9
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3-hydroxy-, methyl ester
645-08-9
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy{isovanillic acid}
87513-63-1
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 3-hydroxy-6-methoxy-, methyl ester
586-30-1
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 3-hydroxy-4-methyl-
586-38-9
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 3-methoxy-
99-04-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table V-3, IX.A-22
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2 V-3, IX.A-22, X-2 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, X-2
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 3-methyl-
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester
99-50-3
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy- {protocatechuic acid}
96937-39-2
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-dimethyl-
96937-40-5
Selected structures
{m-toluic acid}
IV.A-3 V-3 IV.A-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4-dihydroxy-C4-alkyl-methyl-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
93-07-2
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4-dimethoxy-
619-04-5
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4-dimethyl-
IV.A-3, X-2
149-91-7
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-
{gallic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
121-79-9
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, propyl ester {propyl gallate}
V-3, IX.A-22
99-10-5
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 3,5-dihydroxy-
IV.A-3
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
499-06-9
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 3,5-dimethyl-
1918-00-9
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxy-
IV.A-3 IV.A-3, X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 {Dicamba®}
126-64-7
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien-6-yl ester {linalyl benzoate}
619-64-7
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 4-ethyl-
32142-31-7
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 4-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3methoxy-
99-96-7
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-
35285-68-9
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-, ethyl ester, sodium salt
V-3 IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3, VIII-3, X-2
{p-salicylic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22 NaO
V-3, XX-6 COO-C2H5
99-76-3
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-, methyl ester
530-57-4
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy{syringic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
V-3, IX.A-22
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3
121-34-6
1
1
1
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- {vanillic acid}
617-05-0
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-, ethyl ester
V-3, IX.A-22, X-2 V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
3943-74-6
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-, methyl ester
96937-45-0
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-methyl-
121-98-2
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 4-methoxy-, methyl ester {methyl anisate}
99-94-5
0
1
0
Benzoic acid, 4-methyl-
3619-22-5
1
0
0
Benzoic acid, 4-methyl-, hydrazide
1
0
0
Benzoisoquinoline
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzoisoquinoline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
{p-toluic acid}
V-3, X-2 IV.A-3 XIII-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1518
11/24/08 1:55:44 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1519
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1
0
0
Benzoisoquinoline, methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzoisoquinoline, tetramethyl-
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Benzoisoquinoline, trimethyl-
226-88-0
1
0
0
Benzo[a]naphthacene
I.E-6
239-30-5
1
0
0
Benzo[b]naphtho[2,1-d]furan
X-2
1
0
0
Benzo[b]naphtho[2,3-d]furan
1
0
0
Benzo[b]naphtho[2,1-d]thiophene
243-42-5 100-47-0
X-2
1
1
1
Benzonitrile
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, C2-alkyl-
{2 isomers detected}
{phenyl cyanide} {5 isomers detected}
XVIII.A-1 C6H5-CN
XI-2 XI-2
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, C3-alkyl-
6136-68-1
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 3-acetyl-
XI-2
1885-29-6
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2-amino-
36541-24-9
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, dimethyl-
XI-2
5724-56-1
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2,3-dimethyl-
XI-2
21789-36-6
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2,4-dimethyl-
XI-2
13730-09-1
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2,5-dimethyl-
XI-2
XI-2 {anthranilonitrile}
XI-2, XII-2
6575-13-9
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2,6-dimethyl-
XI-2
22884-95-3
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 3,4-dimethyl-
XI-2
34136-59-9
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2-ethyl-
XI-2
25550-22-5
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, methyl-
XI-2
529-19-1
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 2-methyl-
XI-2
34136-57-7
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 3-ethyl-
873-62-1
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 3-hydroxy-
XI-2 XI-2, IX.A-22
620-22-4
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 3-methyl-
XI-2
3435-51-6
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 4-ethenyl-
XI-2
25309-65-3
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 4-ethyl-
XI-2
767-00-0
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 4-hydroxy-
XI-2
104-85-8
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 4-methyl-
XI-2
60484-66-4
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, 4-propyl-
XI-2
1
0
0
Benzonitrile, trimethyl-
189-55-9
1
0
0
Benzo[rst]pentaphene
XI-2
11057-45-7
1
0
0
Benzoperylene
I.E-6
197-70-6
1
0
0
Benzo[b]perylene
I.E-6
{dibenzo[a,i]pyrene}
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1519
11/24/08 1:55:44 PM
1520
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
191-24-2
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]perylene
I.E-6
64760-22-1
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]perylene, dimethyl{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
41699-09-6
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]perylene, methyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
64760-23-2
1
0
0
Benzo[ghi]perylene, trimethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
195-19-7
1
0
0
Benzo[c]phenanthrene
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzo[c]phenanthrene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzo[lmn]phenanthridine
194-03-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{thebenidine} N
4250-90-2
0
1
0
Benzo[g]pteridine-10(2H)-acetaldehyde, 3,4dihydro-7,8-dimethyl-2,4-dioxo-
1086-80-2
0
1
0
Benzo[g]pteridine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, 7,8-dimethyl-
III-12, XVII.E-8 H3C
N
H3 C
N
H N
O
XIV-1, XVII.E-8
NH O
1088-56-8
0
1
0
Benzo[g]pteridine-2,4(3H,10H)-dione, 7,8,10trimethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.E-8
CH3 H3C
N
H3C
N
N
O NH
O
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-3-carboxylic acid, 6,7-dihydroxy2-oxo-
IV.A-3, VI-3, IX.A-22
19484-74-3
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-3-carboxylic acid, 7,8-dihydroxy2-oxo-
IV.A-3, VI-3, IX.A-22
124052-01-3
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-3,4-dione, 2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-2,5,7-trihydroxy-
59-02-9
1
1
1
2H-1-Benzopyran-6-ol, 3,4-dihydro-2,5,7,8tetramethyl-2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-, [2R[2R*(4R*,8R*)]]{D-tocopherol}
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2 CH3
IX.A-22, X-2
HO CH3 O
H3C CH3
CH2-[CH2-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2]3-H
148-03-8
1
0
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-6-ol, 3,4-dihydro-2,5,8-trimethyl2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)- {ȕ-tocopherol}
IX.A-22, X-2
7616-22-0
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-6-ol, 3,4-dihydro-2,7,8-trimethyl2-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-
IX.A-22, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1520
11/24/08 1:55:45 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1521
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
56084-94-7
0
1
0
91-64-5
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) 2H-1-Benzopyran-6-ol, 3,4-dihydro-2,7,8-trimethyl2-(4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32-octamethyl3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31-tritriacontaoctaenyl[3E,7E,11E,15E,19E,23,E,27E] {solanochromene; solanachromene} 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one
Chapter Table
Selected structures
IX.A-22, X-2
HO CH3 O
H3C CH3
CH2-[CH2-CH=C(CH3)-CH2]8-H
VI-3
{coumarin} O
O
26093-31-2
0
1
0
2H-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-amino-4-methyl-
74712-71-3
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-[[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-6methoxy-
VI-3, XII-2
119-84-6
1
1
1
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 3,4-dihydro{dihydrocoumarin}
VI-3
305-01-1
1
1
1
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 6,7-dihydroxy{esculetin}
VI-3, IX.A-22
60091-00-1
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-[(6-O-E-Dglucopyranosyl-E-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]-6methoxy-
531-75-9
1
1
1
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 6-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-7-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3, VIII-3
II.A-5, VI-3, X-2
II.A-5, VI-3, IX.A-22, X-2
{esculin}
HO
HOCH 2
O
O
O
O OH
OH
HO
531-58-8
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-6-hydroxy-
HO
{cichoriin HOCH2
O
O
O
O
OH OH
HO
II.A-5, VI-3, IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3 531-44-2
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-6-methoxy-
H3CO
{scopolin} HOCH2
O
O
O
O
OH OH
HO
II.A-5, VI-3, X-2 93-35-6
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-hydroxy-
VI-3, IX.A-22 HO
148-83-4
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-hydroxy-6-(3,7-dimethyl2,6-octadienyl){ostruthin}
HO
1
1
1
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-hydroxy-6-methoxy{scopoletin}
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-hydroxy-4-methyl-
531-59-9
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-methoxy-
O
CH3
VI-3, IX.A-22
H3CO
HO
90-33-5
O
H3C CH3
92-61-5
O
O
O
O
VI-3, IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3 VI-3, IX.A-22 VI-3, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1521
11/24/08 1:55:45 PM
1522
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 8-methoxy-
71050-53-8
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 6-methoxy-7-(E-Dxylofuranosyloxy)-
II.A-5, VI-3, VIII-3, X-2
VI-3, X-2
18309-73-4
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 6-methoxy-7-[(6-O-E-Dxylopyranosyl-E-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]-
II.A-5, VI-3, VIII-3, X-2
2445-82-1
1
0
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 3-methyl-
92-48-8 66-76-2
1
0
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 6-methyl2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 3,3'-methylenebis[4hydroxy{dicumarol}
4430-31-3
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, octahydro-
970-73-0
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-3,5,7-triol, 3,4-dihydro-2-(3,4,5trihydroxyphenyl)-, (2R-E)-
VI-3 VI-3, IX.A-22 Dicumarol not detected in MSS from coumarin-treated tobacco. VI-3 OH HO 3
HO
2
5
4
HO
4
5
6 7
1
O
OH
8
3
OH
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2 970-74-1
0
1
0
2H-1-Benzopyran-3,5,7-triol, 3,4-dihydro-2-(3,4,5trihydroxyphenyl)-, (2R-Z)-
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2
124052-00-2
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)2,3-dihydro-2,3,5,7-tetrahydroxy-
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2
21637-25-2
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3(E-D-glucofuranosyloxy)-5,7-dihydroxy{isoquercitrin}
117-39-5
1
1
1
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)3,5,7-trihydroxy{quercitin}
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3
OH
7
HO
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
O
5 6
4 1
O
OH 3 2
OH
OH
7215-44-3
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3[(2-O-E-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]5,7-dihydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
1486-70-0
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)5,7-dihydroxy-3-methoxy-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
2068-02-2
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5hydroxy-3,7-dimethoxy-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
491-50-9
0
1
0
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
124051-99-6
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3,5-dihydroxy{quercimeritrin} 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-7[[2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-2,6dihydroxy-3-oxo-4-benzofuranyl]oxy]-2,3-dihydro3,5-dihydroxy-
480-41-1
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-5,7-dihydroxy2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-, (S){naringenin}
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1522
11/24/08 1:55:45 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1523
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
480-10-4
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl){kaempferol glycoside}
HO
O
1
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3,5,7-trihydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl){kaempferol}
OH
OH
HO
1
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
O
O OH
1
OH
O
HOCH2
520-18-3
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
OH HO
O
OH OH
O
55136-76-0
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[(2-O-E-Dglucopyranosyl-E-D- glucopyranosyl)oxy]-7-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
142235-82-3
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[(2-O-E-Dglucopyranosyl-E-D-galactopyranosyl)oxy]-7-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
19895-95-5
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[(2-O-E-Dglucopyranosyl-E-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]-5,7dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
522-12-3
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)oxy]-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7dihydroxy{quercitrin}
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
55696-57-6
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[(O-6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl-(1o2)-O-[6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl-(1o6)]-E-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
55804-74-5
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[(O-6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl-(1o2)-O-[6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl-(1o6)]-E-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
153-18-4
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy{rutin}
HO OH
O
HO ruffinose
O O
OH
II.A-5,III-13,IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3 II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
17650-84-9
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-5,7dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
30311-61-6
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-7-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-5hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
34336-18-0
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-7-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1523
11/24/08 1:55:46 PM
1524
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
29859-91-4
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[O-(6-deoxy-Lmannosyl)-D-galactosyl]oxy]-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
27554-19-4
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[O-(6-deoxy-Lmannosyl)-D-glucosyl]oxy]-5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4hydroxy phenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
58934-57-9
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-[[O-(6deoxymannosyl)glucosyl]oxy]-7-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(4hydroxyphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
828-82-0
1
0
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 3-ethyl-
520-34-3
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-(3hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl){diosmetin}
4382-17-6
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-methoxy-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, hydroxy-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
38445-24-8
1
0
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 6-hydroxy-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
10236-47-2
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 7-[[2-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-2,3dihydro-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-, (S){naringin}
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-phenyl-, 3',4',5,5',7pentahydroxy-3-[[O-(6-deoxymannosyl)-Dglucosyl]oxy]-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
0
1
0
4H-1-Benzopyran-4-one, 2-phenyl-, 3',4',5,7tetrahydroxy-3-[[O-(6-deoxymannosyl)-Dglucosyl]oxy]-
II.A-5, III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
0
1
0
7H-1-Benzopyran-7-one, 2,4a,5,6,8,8a-hexahydro2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-
1
1
1
7H-1-Benzopyran-7-one, 2,3,5,6,8,8a-hexahydro2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl{1,5,5,9-tetramethyl-10-oxabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-6-en3-one}
20194-67-6
5835-18-7
83-79-4
1
0
1
1
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
7H-1-Benzopyran-7-one, octahydro-2,5,5,8atetramethyl{7-chromanone, hexahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-} Benzopyrano[3,4-b]furo[2,3-h][1]benzopyran6(6aH)-one, 1,2,12,12a-tetrahydro-8,9-dimethoxy2-(1-methylethenyl)-, [2R-(2Į,6aĮ,12aĮ)]{Rotenone®}
Selected structures
Chapter Table
III-13, X-2 III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
III-13, X-2
8a
7
III-13, X-2
4
5
3
4a 8a
O
2
1
O
8
6
3
4a
7
O
III-13, X-2
4
5
6
1
2
O
8
III-13, X-2, XXI-3
CH2 H3C H
O
O
O
H
O
OCH3 OCH3
50-32-8
1
0
0
Benzopyrene
1
1
1
Benzo[a]pyrene
I.E-6 {B[a]P}
11
1
12
2
10
I.E-6
3
9 8
4 7
6
5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1524
11/24/08 1:55:46 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1525
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrene, alkyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrene, 3,4-dihydro-
I.E-6
17573-23-8
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrene, 7,8-dihydro-
I.E-6
25167-90-2
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrene, dimethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrene, ethyl-
I.E-6
25167-89-9
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrene, methyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
69453-35-6
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrenediol
63455-19-6
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyrenol
IX.A-22
20928-82-9
1
0
0
Benzo[a]pyren-6-yloxy
IX.A-22
7130-15-6
1
0
0
3H-Benzo[cd]pyrene, 4,5-dihydro-
192-97-2
1
1
1
Benzo[e]pyrene
41699-06-3
1
0
0
Benzo[e]pyrene, dimethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
41699-04-1
1
0
0
Benzo[e]pyrene, methyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
64760-21-0
1
0
0
Benzo[e]pyrene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
30907-88-1
0
1
0
6H-Benzo[c]pyrido[3,2,1-jk]carbazole
IX.A-22
I.E-6
I.E-6
{B[e]P}
XVII.E-6
N
528-58-5
0
1
0
1-Benzopyrylium, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7trihydroxy-, chloride
22688-80-8
0
1
0
1-Benzopyrylium, 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-[(2-OE-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy]-5,7dihydroxy-, chloride
528-53-0
0
1
0
1-Benzopyrylium, 3,5,7-trihydroxy-2-(3,4,5trihydroxyphenyl)-, chloride
18719-76-1
0
1
0
1-Benzopyrylium, 3-[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-, chloride
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2, XVIII.B-3
33978-17-5
0
1
0
1-Benzopyrylium, 3-[6-O-(6-deoxy-D-Lmannopyranosyl)-E-D-glucopyranosyl]oxy]-5,7dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-, chloride
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2, XVIII.B-3
39327-16-7
1
0
0
Benzoquinoline
{benzo[g]quinoline}
IX.A-22, X-2, XVIII.B-3 II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2, XVIII.B-3
II.A-5, IX.A-22, XVIII.B-3
f
e
XVII.E-6
c
d
g
a
b
N
1
0
0
Benzoquinoline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1525
11/24/08 1:55:46 PM
1526
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
0
0
Benzoquinoline, methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzoquinoline, tetramethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzoquinoline, trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Benzo[c]quinoline {phenanthridine; 9-azaphenanthrene}
XVII.E-6
85-02-9
1
0
0
Benzo[f]quinoline
{1-azaphenanthrene}
XVII.E-6
230-27-3
1
0
0
Benzo[h]quinoline
{4-azaphenanthrene}
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
o-Benzosemiquinone radical
1
0
0
p-Benzosemiquinone radical
95-16-9
1
1
1
Benzothiazole
120-78-5
0
1
0
Benzothiazole, 2,2’-dithiobis-
CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XXVII-1 XXVII-1 {benzosulfonazole}
XVIII.A-1
S N
{Thiofide®}
_
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
_
N
S_
615-22-5
0
1
0
Benzothiazole, 2-methylthio-
934-34-9
0
1
0
2(3H)-Benzothiazolone
S
_
2
XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1
S O N H
1128-67-2
1
0
0
2(3H)-Benzothiazolone, 3-methyl-, hydrazone
XVIII.A-1
95-15-8
1
0
0
Benzo[b]thiophene
XVIII.A-1 S
1
0
0
Benzo[b]thiophene, C2-alkyl-
1
0
0
Benzo[b]thiophene, C3-alkyl-
1
0
0
Benzo[b]thiophene, methyl-
14315-11-8
1
0
0
Benzo[b]thiophene, 4-methyl-
95-14-7
1
0
0
1H-Benzotriazole
XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1 {4 isomers reported}
{1,2,3-triaza-1H-indene}
XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1 XVII.E-6
H N N N
215-58-7
1
0
0
Benzo[b]triphenylene
{dibenz[a,c]anthracene}
64760-20-9
1
0
0
Benzo[b]triphenylene, methyl-
I.E-6
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1526
11/24/08 1:55:47 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1527
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
17924-92-4
0
1
0
1H-2-Benzoxacyclotetradecin-1,7(8H)-dione, 3,4,5,6,9,10-hexahydro-14,16-dihydroxy-3methyl-, [S-(E)]-
273-53-0
1
0
0
Benzoxazole
Name (per CA Collective Index)
{1-oxa-3-azaindene}
Selected structures
II.A-5
4
XVII.D-2
3
N
5
2
6
O
7
72692-90-1
Chapter Table
1
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, C2-alkyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
5676-58-4
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
72692-91-2
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, 4,6-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
78210-58-9
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, 5,7-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
78210-57-8
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, 7-ethyl-
XVII.D-2
95-21-6
1
0
0
Benzoxazole, 2-methyl-
XVII.D-2
27548-56-7
0
1
0
3-Benzoxepin-7-methanol, 5a,6,7,8,9,9ahexahydro-D,D,5,9a-tetramethyl-, (5aD,7D,9aD)-(-)-
7440-41-7
1
1
1
Beryllium
434-85-5
1
0
0
[9,9'-Bianthracene]-10,10'(9H,9'H)-dione {bianthrone; dianthraquinone}
II.A-5, X-2 Be
XX-5 III-13
O 1
8 9
7
2 3
6 4
5
O
121-46-0
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta-2,5-diene
I.C-1
79-92-5
1
1
1
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 2,2-dimethyl-3-methylene{camphene}
I.C-1
8001-35-2
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 2,2-dimethyl-3-methylene-, polychlorinated {Toxaphene®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
8001-50-1
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 2,2-dimethyl-3-methylene-, polychlorinated + Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene, 2,6,6-trimethyl-, polychlorinated {Strobane®; Dichloricide®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
509-11-5
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol, 1,7-dimethyl-, (exo,anti)-
507-70-0
1
1
1
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol, 1,7,7-trimethyl-, endo{borneol}
{norbornadiene}
II.A-5 II.A-5
CH3 OH H3C__ CH3
125-12-2
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-ol, 1,7,7-trimethyl-, acetate {isobornyl acetate}
V-3
2756-56-1
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol, 1,7,7-trimethyl-, propanoate, exo-
V-3
1195-79-5
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one, 1,3,3-trimethyl-
III-13
4695-62-9
0
1
0
Bicyclo[2,2,1]heptan-2-one, 1,3,3-trimethyl{d-fenchone}
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1527
11/24/08 1:55:47 PM
1528
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
76-22-2
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one, 1,7,7-trimethyl{camphor}
Chapter Table III-13
CH3 O H3C__ CH3
I.C-1
498-66-8
1
0
0
Bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene
127-91-3 18172-67-3
1
1
1
Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene{E-pinene}
I.C-1
22422-24-0
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3,1,1]heptane-2,3-diol, 2,6,6-trimethyl{2,3-pinanediol}
II.A-5
{norbornene}
HO
80-56-8 7785-26-4
1
1
1
Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene, 2,6,6-trimethyl{D-pinene}
4889-83-2
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene, 3,6,6-trimethyl-
515-00-4
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene-2-methanol, 6,6-dimethyl-
HO
I.C-1
I.C-1 II.A-5
CH3 CH3
CH2OH
3387-41-5
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane, 4-methylene-1-(1methylethyl){sabinene}
I.C-1
471-16-9
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.1.0]hexan-3-ol, 4-methylene-1-(1methylethyl)-, [1S-(1D,3E,5D)]{sabinol}
II.A-5
2867-05-2
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl){3-thujene}
I.C-1
3917-48-4
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl), (1R)-
I.C-1
92-51-3
1
1
1
1,1'-Bicyclohexyl
I.C-1
280-65-9
1
0
0
Bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane
{cyclohexylcyclohexane}
I.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1528
11/24/08 1:55:47 PM
1529
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
124749-69-5
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Bicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-3-one, 1-hydroxy-6-(1methylethyl)-, endo-
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, III-13
CH3 H3C
O
OH
123695-64-7
1
0
0
Bicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-3-one, 1-hydroxy-6-(1methylethyl)-, exo-
61185-25-9
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-en-2-one, 4,4,9-trimethyl-8methylene-, anti-
II.A-5, III-13 III-13
H3C 5
6
H3C
7
3
9
1
8
CH3
4 2
O
H2C
0
1
0
Bicyclo[3.3.1]non-6-en-2-one, 4,9,9-trimethyl-8methylene-
13466-78-9
0
1
0
Bicyclo[4.1.0]hept-3-ene, 3,7,7-trimethyl-
87-44-5
0
1
0
Bicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene, 4,11,11-trimethyl-8methylene-, [1R-(1R*,4E,9S*)]- {E-caryophyllene}
III-13 I.C-1 I.C-1
CH3 10 9
H2C
CH3
11 1
2
8 5
7
3
4
6
CH3
32214-91-8
0
1
0
Bicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene, 4,11,11-trimethyl-8methylene-, acetate {E-caryophyllene acetate}
V-3
53093-94-0
0
1
0
2,2'-Bifuran, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2,5'-dimethyl-5-(1methylethenyl)-, (Z)- (±)-
X-2
53093-95-1
0
1
0
2,2'-Bifuran, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2,5'-dimethyl-5-(1methylethenyl)-, (E)- (±)-
X-2
53093-96-2
0
1
0
2,2'-Bifuran, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2,5'-dimethyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, (Z)- (r)-
X-2
53093-97-3
0
1
0
2,2'-Bifuran, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2,5'-dimethyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, (E)- (±)-
X-2
20298-86-6
0
1
0
21H-Biline-8,12-dipropanoic acid, 18-ethyl-3ethylidene-1,2,3,19,22,24-hexahydro-2,7,13,17tetramethyl-1,19-dioxo-, (2R,3E)-
HOOC
H3C CH CH3
H3C
O
4
1
N H
(CH2)2 (CH2)2 7
3
2
5
C H2
COOH
8
12 9
6
N H
10
C H
11
N H
CH3 13 14
CH3
C2H5
17 18 15
C H2
16
19
N H
O
IV.A-3, XVII.C-1 604-53-5
1
0
0
1,1'-Binaphthalene
I.E-6
71265-39-9
1
0
0
1,1'-Binaphthalene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
71277-81-1
1
0
0
1,1'-Binaphthalene, ethyl-
I.E-6
59615-45-5
1
0
0
1,1’-Binaphthalene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1,2’-Binaphthalene
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1529
11/24/08 1:55:48 PM
1530
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
612-78-2
1
0
0
2,2'-Binaphthalene
I.E-6
71294-43-4
1
0
0
2,2'-Binaphthalene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
71277-82-2
1
0
0
2,2'-Binaphthalene, ethyl-
I.E-6
41637-91-6
1
0
0
2,2'-Binaphthalene, methyl-
I.E-6
92-52-4
1
1
1
1,1'-Biphenyl
{diphenyl}
2'
3'
2 1'
4' 5'
6'
I.D-1
3
1
4 6
5
2051-24-3
1
1
1
1,1'-Biphenyl, decachloro-
92-87-5
1
0
0
1,1’-Biphenyl, 4,4’-diamino-
XII-2
61141-66-0
0
1
0
1,1’-Biphenyl, 3,4-diethyl-
I.D-1
1133-63-7
1
0
0
1,1’-Biphenyl, 2,3-dihydroxy-
0
1
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 3,4'-dimethyl-
XVIII.B-3
IX.A-22 I.D-1
613-33-2
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 4,4'-dimethyl-
I.D-1
28013-11-8
1
1
1
1,1'-Biphenyl, ar,ar'-dimethyl-
I.D-1
40529-66-6
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, ethyl-
I.D-1
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 2-ethyl-
I.D-1
71277-83-3
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, ethylmethyl-
I.D-1
28652-72-4
1
1
1
1,1'-Biphenyl, methyl-
I.D-1
643-58-3
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 2-methyl-
I.D-1
643-93-6
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 3-methyl-
I.D-1
644-08-6
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 4-methyl-
I.D-1
92-93-3
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, 4-nitro-
XVI-1
71294-42-3
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, propyl-
I.D-1
30581-97-6
1
0
0
1,1'-Biphenyl, trimethyl-
90-41-5
1
0
0
[1,1'-Biphenyl]-2-amine
{3 isomers detected}
I.D-1 XII-2
2243-47-2
1
0
0
[1,1'-Biphenyl]-3-amine
XII-2
92-67-1
1
0
0
[1,1'-Biphenyl]-4-amine
1
0
0
[1,1'-Biphenyl]-ol
IX.A-22
90-43-7
1
0
0
[1,1'-Biphenyl]-2-ol
IX.A-22
92-69-3
1
0
0
[1,1'-Biphenyl]-4-ol
IX.A-22
259-79-0
1
0
0
Biphenylene
531-67-9
0
1
0
2,2’-Bipiperidine
37275-48-2
1
0
0
Bipyridine
78310-61-9
1
0
0
Bipyridine, dimethyl-
64859-48-9
1
0
0
Bipyridine, ethyl-
64859-47-9
1
0
0
Bipyridine, methyl-
64859-47-8
1
0
0
Bipyridine, methyl-
{4-aminobiphenyl}
XII-2
I.E-6
H N
H N
XVII.B-6
XVII.B-6 {2 isomers detected}
XVII.B-6 XVII.B-6
{4 isomers in all}
XVII.B-6 XVII.B-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1530
11/24/08 1:55:48 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1531
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
78310-62-0
1
0
0
Bipyridine, phenyl-
366-18-7
1
1
1
2,2'-Bipyridine
1
0
0
2,2’-Bipyridine, amino-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
2,2'-Bipyridine, 4,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-6
78210-73-8 56100-19-7
1
0
0
2,2'-Bipyridine, 4-methyl-
581-50-0
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine
XVII.B-6 {nicoteine}
XVII.B-6
XVII.B-6 {isonicoteine}
XVII.B-6
4 5
3 4'
6
5'
N 2'
2743-90-0
581-49-7
N
6'
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, dimethyl-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, methyl-
XVII.B-6
0
1
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-, (r)-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-, (R){d-anatabine}
XVII.B-6
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-, (S){l-anatabine}
XVII.B-6 N H N
61892-64-6
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-ethyl-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-methyl-
XVII.B-6
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1-acetyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-, (S){N’-acetylanatabine}
XVII.B-6 N N
CO-CH3
5953-51-5
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl-, (S)-
XVII.B-6
96552-71-5
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-1-(1-oxohexyl)-, (S){N’-hexanoylanatabine}
XVII.B-6
96552-72-6
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-1-(1-oxooctyl)-, (S){N’-octanoylanatabine}
XVII.B-6
71267-22-6
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-1-nitroso-, (S){NAT}
61892-98-6
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 1-ethyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-, (S)-
XVII.B-6
26636-59-9
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 2'(or 3)-methyl-
XVII.B-6
78210-76-1
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 3-ethyl-
XVII.B-6
XV-8, XVII.B-6
78210-75-0
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 4-(2-butenyl)-
XVII.B-6
78210-74-9
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 4-(2-propenyl)-
XVII.B-6
38840-05-0
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine, 4-methyl-
XVII.B-6
20410-87-1
0
1
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-(1-methyl-2-piperidinyl)-, (+)-
XVII.B-6
0
1
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-(2-piperidinyl)-
XVII.B-6
78210-79-4
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-6
78210-81-8
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-ethenyl-
XVII.B-6
{anabasamine}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1531
11/24/08 1:55:48 PM
1532
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
34671-89-1
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-ethyl-
XVII.B-6
26844-80-4
1
1
1
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-methyl-
XVII.B-6
78210-80-7
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 5-propyl-
XVII.B-6
78210-77-2
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 6-ethyl-
XVII.B-6
78210-78-3
1
0
0
2,3'-Bipyridine, 6-methyl-
61892-65-7
1
1
1
[2,3'-Bipyridine]-1(2H)-carboxaldehyde, 3,6-dihydro, (S){N’-formylanatabine}
III-12, XVII.B-6
96552-70-4
1
0
0
[2,3'-Bipyridine]-1(2H)-carboxylic acid, 3,6-dihydro-, methyl ester, (S)-
V-3, XVII.B-6
70898-21-4
1
0
0
[2,3'-Bipyridin]-6'(1'H)-one, 3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-
581-47-5
1
1
1
2,4'-Bipyridine
XVII.B-6
581-46-4
1
1
1
3,3'-Bipyridine
XVII.B-6
38840-06-1
0
1
0
3,3'-Bipyridine, 4-methyl-
XVII.B-6
78210-82-9
1
0
0
3,3'-Bipyridine, 5-methyl-
XVII.B-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
XVII.B-6
XVII.B-6, XVII.C-1
78210-83-0
1
0
0
3,3'-Bipyridine, 6-methyl-
XVII.B-6
553-26-4
1
1
1
4,4'-Bipyridine
XVII.B-6
7440-69-9
1
1
1
Bismuth
Bi
14331-79-4
1
1
1
Bismuth, isotope of mass 210
210
XX-5 XX-5 XX-5
7440-42-8
XX-5 Bi
0
1
0
Bismuth, isotope of mass 216
216
1
1
1
Boron
B
Bi
-1
24959-67-9
1
1
1
Bromide
7726-95-6
1
1
1
Bromine
Br2
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
14686-69-2
1
1
1
Bromine, isotope of mass 82
82
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
25339-57-5
Br
Br2
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
1
0
0
Butadiene
1
0
0
Butadiene radical
590-19-2
1
0
0
1,2-Butadiene
H2C=C=CH-CH3
I.B-1
106-99-0
1
0
0
1,3-Butadiene
H2C=CH-CH=CH2
I.B-1
78-79-5
1
0
0
1,3-Butadiene, 2-methyl-
1
0
0
1,3-Butadiene, 2-methyl- radical {isoprene radical}
1
0
0
1,3-Butadiene, 1,2,4-trialkyl1,3-Butadiene, 2-(4’,8’,12’-trimethyltridecyl)-
460-12-8
1
0
0
1,3-Butadiyne
123-72-8
1
1
1
Butanal
0
1
0
Butanal, 4-amino-
H2N-(CH2)3-CH=O
III-12, XII-2
1
0
0
Butanal, 3,4-dihydroxy-
HOCH2-CHOH-CH2-CH=O
II.A-5, III-12
34764-22-2 2109-98-0
1
0
0
Butanal, 2,3-dimethyl-
97-96-1
1
1
1
Butanal, 2-ethyl-
107-89-1
1
0
0
Butanal, 3-hydroxy-
0
1
0
Butanal, 3-hydroxy-2-oxo-
1
0
0
Butanal, 4-hydroxy-
25714-71-0
I.B-1 XXVII-1
{isoprene}
H2C=C(CH3)-CH=CH2
I.B-1 XXVII-1
R-CH=C(R1)-CH=CH-R2 I.B-1 See: 1-Hexadecene, 3-methylene-7,11,15trimethyl-
{butyraldehyde}
HCŁC-CŁCH
I.B-1
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=O
III-12
III-12 {diethylacetaldehyde} {aldol} {methylreductone}
(C 2 H5)2=CH-CH=O H3C-CHOH-CH2-CH=O
III-12 II.A-5, III-12
H3C-CHOH-CO-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, III-13 HO-(CH2)3-CH=O
II.A-5, III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1532
11/24/08 1:55:49 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1533
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
0
0
Butanal, 4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-
96-17-3
1
1
1
Butanal, 2-methyl-
590-86-3
1
1
1
Butanal, 3-methyl{3-methylbutyraldehyde; isovaleraldehyde}
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CH=O
III-12
7729-27-3
0
1
0
Butanal, 4-(methylamino)-
H3C-NH-(CH2)3-CH=O
III-12
0
1
0
Butanal, 2-methyl-4-phenyl-
1
0
0
Butanal, 2-oxo-
CAS No.
4417-81-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{2-methylbutyraldehyde}
HO-CH2CH2-O-(CH2)3-CH=O II.A-5, III-12, X-2 III-12 H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH=O
C5H6-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH=O {ethylglyoxal} {erythrose}
III-12
H3C-CH2-CO-CH=O
III-12, III-13
HOCH2-(CHOH)2-CH=O
II.A-5, III-12
1758-51-6
0
1
0
Butanal, 2,3,4-trihydroxy-, (R*,R*)-
541-35-5
1
0
0
Butanamide
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-NH2
XIII-1
66309-91-9
1
0
0
Butanamide, 2,3-dimethyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH(CH3)-CO-NH2
XIII-1
1113-57-1
1
0
0
Butanamide, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CO-NH2
XIII-1
61892-66-8
1
0
0
Butanamide, 3-cyano-3-methyl-
(H3C)2=C(CN)-CH2-CO-NH2
XIII-1
541-46-8
1
0
0
Butanamide, 3-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CO-NH2
53897-27-1
1
0
0
Butanamide, 4-cyano-
NC-(CH2)3-CO-NH2 H3C-(CH2)3-NH2
109-73-9
1
1
1
1-Butanamine
71277-84-4
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, methyl-
XIII-1 XI-2, XIII-1 XII-2 XII-2
96-15-1
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-NH2
XII-2
107-85-7
1
1
1
1-Butanamine, 3-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)2-NH2
XII-2
78579-58-5
1
1
1
1-Butanamine, 3-methyl-N-propyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)2-NH-(CH2)2-CH3
XII-2
111-92-2
0
1
0
1-Butanamine, N-butyl-
[H3C-(CH2)3]2=NH
XII-2
924-16-3
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, N-butyl-N-nitroso-
[H3C-(CH2)3]2=N-NO
XII-2, XV-8
110-68-9
1
1
1
1-Butanamine, N-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-NH-CH3
XII-2
7068-83-9
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-
H3C-(CH2)3-N(NO)-CH3
{NDBA}
XII-2, XV-8
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, N-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C-(CH2)3-NH-CH=(CH3)2
56375-33-8
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, N-nitroso-
H3C-(CH2)3-NH-NO
20810-06-4
1
0
0
1-Butanamine, N-(2-methylpropyl)-
H3C-(CH2)3-NH-CH2-CH=(CH3)2
XII-2
4104-44-3
0
1
0
1-Butanamine, N,3-dimethyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)2-NH-CH3
XII-2
13952-84-6
XII-2 XII-2, XV-8
1
1
1
2-Butanamine
H3C-CH2-CH(NH2)-CH3
XII-2
1
0
0
2-Butanamine, N-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(NH-CH3)-CH3
XII-2
626-23-3
0
1
0
2-Butanamine, N-(1-methylpropyl)-
106-97-8
1
0
0
Butane
H3C-(CH2)2-CH3
1.A-10
75-83-2
1
0
0
Butane, 2,2-dimethyl-
(H3C)3ŁC-CH2-CH3
1.A-10
1
0
0
Butane, methyl-
C4H9-CH3
1.A-10
78-78-4
1
1
1
Butane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CH3
1.A-10
628-29-5
1
0
0
Butane, 1-(methylthio)-
627-05-4
1
0
0
Butane, 1-nitro-
XII-2
{butyl methyl sulfide}
H3C-S-(CH2)3-CH3 H3C-(CH2)2-CH2-NO2
XVIII.A-1 XVI-1
600-24-8
1
0
0
Butane, 2-nitro-
H3C-CH2-CH(NO2)-CH3
1613-46-3
1
0
0
Butane, 1-(propylthio)-
H3C-(CH2)2-S-(CH2)3-CH3
XVIII.A-1
H3C-(CH2)3-S-(CH2)3-CH3
XVIII.A-1
544-40-1
1
0
0
Butane, 1,1'-thiobis-
638-37-9
1
0
0
Butanedial
110-14-5
1
0
0
Butanediamide
{dibutyl sulfide} {succinaldehyde} {succinamide}
O=CH-(CH2)2-CH=O H2N-CO-(CH2)2-CO-NH2
XVI-1
III-12 XIII-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1533
11/24/08 1:55:49 PM
1534
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
16748-73-5
0
1
0
Butanediamide, 2-amino-, (S)- {asparagine amide}
H2N-CO-CH2-CH(NH2)-CO-NH2 XII-2, XIII-1
110-60-1
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediamine
H2N-(CH2)4-NH2
XII-2
124-20-9
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediamine, N-(3-aminopropyl){spermidine}
H2N-(CH2)4-NH-(CH2)3-NH2
XII-2
71-44-3
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediamine, N,N'-bis(3-aminopropyl){spermine}
H2N-(CH2)3-NH-(CH2)4-NH-(CH2)3-NH2 XII-2
Selected structures
{putrescine}
15657-58-6
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediamine, 2-methyl-
H2N-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH2-NH2
XII-2
14475-60-6
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediamine, N-methyl-
H2N-(CH2)4-NH-CH3
XII-2
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediamine, 3-phenylpropenoyl{cinnamoylputrescine}
110-61-2
1
0
0
Butanedinitrile
16411-13-5
0
1
0
Butanedinitrile, 2,3-dimethyl-
{succinonitrile}
V-3, XII-2 NC-(CH2)2-CN
XI-2
NC-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)-CN
XI-2
1
1
1
Butanedioate, hydroxy-
110-15-6
1
1
1
Butanedioic acid
121-75-5
1
1
1
Butanedioic acid, [(dimethoxyphosphinothioyl)thio]-, diethyl ester {Malathion®}
(H3CO)2=P=S Ň S Ň HC-COO-C2H5 Ň H2C-COO-C2H5
106-65-0
1
1
1
Butanedioic acid, dimethyl ester {dimethyl succinate}
H3C-OOC-(CH2)2-COO-CH3
HOOC-CHOH-CH2-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3
6915-15-7
{malate} {succinic acid}
{malic acid}
II.A-5, XX-6 HOOC-(CH2)2-COOH
IV.A-3 V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
V-3
1
1
1
Butanedioic acid, hydroxy-
1
1
1
Butanedioic acid, hydroxy-, labeled with C 14 {malic acid- C}
XXV-29
1587-15-1
1
0
0
Butanedioic acid, hydroxy-, dimethyl ester {dimethyl malate; malic acid dimethyl ester}
H3C-OOC-CHOH-CH2-COO-CH3 II.A-5, V-3
585-09-1
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, hydroxy-, dipotassium salt
KOOC-CHOH-CH2-COOK
71608-04-3
1
0
0
Butanedioic acid, (hydroxymethylene)-
498-21-5
1
0
0
Butanedioic acid, methyl-
14
II.A-5, XX-6 II.A-5, IV.A-3
HOOC-CH(CH3)-CH2-COOH
IV.A-3
HOOC-C(=CH2)-CH2-COOH
IV.A-3
636-60-2
1
0
0
Butanedioic acid, methyl-, (±)-
97-65-4
1
1
1
Butanedioic acid, methylene-
IV.A-3
2338-45-6
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, (1-methylethyl)-
3878-55-5
1
0
0
Butanedioic acid, monomethyl ester
HOOC-(CH2)2-COO-CH3 HOOC-CO-CH 2-COOH
{itaconic acid}
IV.A-3
328-42-7
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, oxo-
3237-44-3
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2-hydroxy-2-(1-methylethyl)-
18734-79-7
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2-methyl-3-phenyl-
35392-77-9
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-diethyl-, (R*,R*)-(±){succinic acid, 2,3-diethyl-}
HOOC-CH(C2H5)-CH(C2H5)-COOH
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-
HOOC-CHOH-CHOH-COOH
526-83-0
1
1
1
{oxalacetic acid}
IV.A-3, V-3
{tartaric acid}
IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 IV.A-3 IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1534
11/24/08 1:55:50 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1535
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
147-71-7
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy{d-tartaric acid}
II.A-5, IV.A-3
87-69-4
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy{l-tartaric acid}
II.A-5, IV.A-3
133-37-9
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
147-73-9
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy{meso-tartaric acid}
II.A-5, IV.A-3
921-53-9
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy- [R-(R*,R*)]-, dipotassium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
13545-04-5
0
1
0
Butanedioic acid, 2,3-dimethyl{succinic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-}
52642-07-6
1
0
0
Butanediol, monoacetate
107-88-0
1
1
1
1,3-Butanediol
{1,3-butylene glycol}
110-63-4
0
1
0
1,4-Butanediol
{tetramethylene glycol}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{dl-tartaric acid}
HOOC-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)-COOH IV.A-3 II.A-5, V-3 H3C-CHOH-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5
HOCH2-(CH2) 2-CH2OH
II.A-5
513-85-9
1
1
1
2,3-Butanediol
5341-95-7
1
0
0
2,3-Butanediol, (R*,S*)-
431-03-8 29350-67-2
1
1
1
2,3-Butanedione
109-74-0
1
0
0
Butanenitrile
H3C-(CH2) 2-CN
13989-82-7
1
0
0
Butanenitrile, 4-(dimethylamino)-
(H3C)2=N-(CH2)3-CN
{diacetyl; biacetyl}
H3C-CHOH-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5
H3C-CO-CO-CH3
II.A-5 III-13 XI-2 XI-2, XII-2
4476-02-2
1
0
0
Butanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-
H3C-CH2-CHOH-CN
II.A-5, XI-2
15344-34-0
1
0
0
Butanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CHOH-CN
II.A-5, XI-2
18937-17-9
1
0
0
Butanenitrile, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CN
XI-2
625-28-5
1
1
1
Butanenitrile, 3-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CN
XI-2
HOCH2-(CHOH) 2-CH2OH
149-32-6
1
1
1
1,2,3,4-Butanetetrol, (R*,S*)- {erythritol}
68510-02-1
0
1
0
1,2,3,4-Butanetetrol, 1-[5-(2,3,4trihydroxybutyl)pyrazinyl]{2,5-deoxyfructosazine}
N R
0
1
0
1,2,3,4-Butanetetrol, 1-[6-(2,3,4trihydroxybutyl)pyrazinyl]{2,6-deoxyfructosazine}
R = HOCH2-(CHOH)2-
OH R
N
N
109-79-5
1
0
0
1-Butanethiol
{butyl mercaptan}
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
N OH
68510-03-2
R
II.A-5
R
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
R = HOCH2-(CHOH)2-
H3C-(CH2)3-SH
XVIII.A-1
541-31-1
1
0
0
1-Butanethiol, 3-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)2-SH
XVIII.A-1
513-53-1
1
0
0
2-Butanethiol
H3C-CH2-CH(SH)-CH3
XVIII.A-1
4435-50-1
1
0
0
1,2,3-Butanetriol
3068-00-6
0
1
0
1,2,4-Butanetriol
1
1
1
Butanimine
1
1
1
Butanoic acid
107-92-6
{1-methylglycerol}
{butyric acid}
H 3C-CHOH-CHOH-CH2OH
II.A-5
H2COH-CHOH-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=NH
XII-2
H3C-(CH2)2-COOH
IV.A-3
109-21-7
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, butyl ester
10094-34-5
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 1,1-dimethyl-2-phenylethyl ester
H3C-(CH2) 2-COO-(CH2)3-CH3
V-3
V-3
106-29-6
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester {geranyl butyrate}
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1535
11/24/08 1:55:50 PM
1536
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index) {ethyl butyrate}
Chapter Table
Selected structures
105-54-4
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, ethyl ester
26912-31-2
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, hexenyl ester
H3C-(CH2)2-COO-(CH2)4-n-CH=CH-(CH2)n-H V-3
H3C-(CH2)2-COO-C2H5
V-3
H3C-(CH2)2-COO-CH3
623-42-7
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, methyl ester
5398-90-2
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methylpropyl ester
V-3
540-18-1
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, pentyl ester
H3C-(CH2)2-COO-(CH2)4-CH3
V-3
103-37-7
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl butyrate}
H3C-(CH2) 2-COO-CH2-C6H5
V-3
80-60-4
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-amino-
H3C-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH
7004-04-8
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-amino-3-hydroxy-
H3C-CHOH-CH(NH2)-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3, XII-2
454-41-1
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-amino-4-(methylsulfinyl)-
1118-85-0 3226-65-1
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-amino-4-(methylsulfonyl){methionine sulfone; methionine S-oxide}
2338-03-6
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-amino-4-oxo-, (S)-
14287-61-7
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2,3-dimethyl(H3C)2=CH-CH(CH3)-COOH
141-16-2
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenyl ester {citronellyl butyrate}
V-3
IV.A-3, XII-2
IV.A-3, XII-2, XVIII.A-1 H3C-SO-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, XII-2, XVIII.A-1 IV.A-3, XII-2 IV.A-3
{diethylacetic acid}
V-3
88-09-5
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-ethyl-
(H 3C-CH2)2=CH-COOH
IV.A-3
565-70-8
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-
H3C-CH2-CHOH-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
3739-30-8
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-C(CH3)(OH)-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3
4026-18-0
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-CHOH-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3
116-53-0
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-
H 3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-COOH
7452-79-1
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester
{2-methylbutyric acid}
IV.A-3
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
10032-15-2
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, hexyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-COO-(CH2)5-CH3 V-3
868-57-5
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-COO-CH3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-methylbutyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-methylpropyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-phenylethyl ester
V-3
600-18-0
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 2-oxo-
78986-08-0
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 2,4,4-trimethyl-3-(3-oxo-1-butenyl)-2cyclohexen-1-yl ester
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-amino-
H3C-CH(NH2)-CH2-COOH
1070-83-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3,3-dimethyl-
(H3C)3ŁC-CH2-COOH
300-85-6
1
0
0
Butanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-
H3C-CHOH-CH2-COOH
625-08-1
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)(OH)-CH2-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3 (H3C)2=CH-CH2-COOH
H3C-CH2-CO-COOH
503-74-2
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-
109-19-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, butyl ester;
{isovaleric acid}
V-3
III-13, IV.A-3 III-13, V-3 IV.A-3, XII-2 IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
IV.A-3 V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1536
11/24/08 1:55:50 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1537
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1009-20-6
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6octadieny-1-yl ester
V-3
76-50-6
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 1,7,7trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl ester, endo{bornyl isovalerate}
V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 2-methylbutyl ester
V-3
78-35-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadien6-yl ester {linalyl isobutyrate}
V-3
16409-46-4
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 5-methyl-2-(1methylethyl)-cyclohexanyl ester {menthyl isovalerate}
V-3
55066-56-3
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 4-methylphenyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 2-methylpropyl ester
V-3
140-26-1
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 2-phenylethyl ester {phenethyl isovalerate}
V-3
108-64-5
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, ethyl ester {ethyl isovalerate}
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-COO-C2H5
V-3
556-24-1
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, methyl ester {methyl isovalerate}
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-COO-CH3
V-3
659-70-1
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester {isoamyl isovalerate}
V-3
103-38-8
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl isovalerate}
V-3
140-27-2
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester
V-3
106-27-4
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester
V-3
541-50-4
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 3-oxo-
H3C-CO-CH2-COOH
III-13, IV.A-3
56-12-2
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 4-amino-
H2N-(CH2)3-COOH
IV.A-3, XII-2
61445-55-4 133201-39-5
1
1
1
Butanoic acid, 4-(methylnitrosoamino)- = Butanoic acid, 4-[(nitrosomethyl)amino]- {NMBA}
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)3-COOH
IV.A-3, XV-8
1
0
0
Butanoic acid, 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-, methyl ester
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)3-COOCH3
583-92-6
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 4-(methylthio)-2-oxo-
H3C-S-(CH2)2-CO-COOH III-13, IV.A-3, XVIII.A-1
54344-76-2
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexen-1-yl)-
IV.A-3
462-10-2
0
1
0
Butanoic acid, 4,4'-dithiobis[2-amino{homocystine}
[S-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH]2 IV.A-3, XII-2, XVIII-1
71-36-3
1
1
1
1-Butanol
H3C-(CH2)2-CH2OH
20281-85-0 91599-03-0
{acetoacetic acid}
{n-butyl alcohol}
V-3, XV-8
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Butanol, 2,3-dimethyl-
0
1
0
1-Butanol, 2-ethoxy-
II.A-5, X-2
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Butanol, 4-[(7-E-D-glucopyranosyl-7H-purin-6yl)amino]-2-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
137-32-6
1
1
1
1-Butanol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
23599-75-9
1
1
1
1-Butanol, 2-methyl-4-(1H-purin-6-ylamino)-
II.A-5
123-51-3
1
1
1
1-Butanol, 3-methyl-
{isoamyl alcohol}
II.A-5
94-46-2
1
1
1
1-Butanol, 3-methyl-, benzoate {isoamyl benzoate}
V-3
0
1
0
1-Butanol, 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl){NNAL}
II.A-5, XII-2, XV-8, XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1537
11/24/08 1:55:51 PM
1538
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
78-92-2
1
1
1
2-Butanol
6291-17-4
1
0
0
2-Butanol, 3-amino-2-methyl-
155728-85-1
0
1
0
2-Butanol, 1-(4-bromophenoxy)-3[(phenylmethyl)amino]-, (R*,R*)-
75-85-4
1
0
0
2-Butanol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
2-Butanol, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
II.A-5
35734-62-4
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl)-
II.A-5, III-13
51769-21-2
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (±)-
II.A-5, III-13
495-40-9
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-phenyl-
61892-81-7
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-pyrazinyl-
1701-70-8
1
1
1
1-Butanone, 1-(3-pyridinyl)-
28384-26-1
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-(methyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-(2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-(3-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 1-(4-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
78210-70-5
1
0
0
1-Butanone, 2-methyl-1-(3-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
68697-66-5
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 3-(methylthio)-1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3cyclohexadien-1-yl)-
III-13, XVIII.A-1
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 3-(methylthio)-1-(2,6,6trimethylcyclohexenyl)-
III-13, XVIII.A-1
1
1
1
1-Butanone, 4-amino-1-(3-pyridinyl)-
71278-11-0 59578-62-0
{sec-butyl alcohol}
Chapter Table
Selected structures H3C-CH2-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5 II.A-5, XII-2
II.A-5, XII-2, XVIII.B-3
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-C6H5
III-13 III-13, XVII.B-2 III-13, XVII.B-2
{propyl pyridyl ketone}
III-13
{poikiline}
III-13, XVII.B-2
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 4-hydroxy-1-(3-pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, XVII.B-2
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 4-(methylamino)-1-(2.6-dihydroxy-3pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, XVII.B-2
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 4-(methylamino)-1-(6-hydroxypyridinyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, XVII.B-2
2055-23-4
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 4-(methylamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XII-2, XVII.B-2
64091-91-4, 121268-99-3, 126165-82-0
1
1
1
1-Butanone, 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl){NNK} {1-Butanone, 4-[(nitrosomethyl)amino]-1-(3pyridinyl)-}
III-13, XII-2, XV-8, XVII.B-2
76014-82-9
0
1
0
1-Butanone, 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-, N-oxide
III-13, XII-2, XV-8, XVII.B-2
78-93-3
1
1
1
2-Butanone
1575-57-1
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 1-(acetyloxy)-
{methyl ethyl ketone}
H3C-CO-CH2-CH3 H3C-CH2-CO-CH2-OOC-CH3
III-13 III-13, V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1538
11/24/08 1:55:51 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1539
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
43121-43-3
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 1-(4-chlorophenoxy)-3,3-dimethyl-1(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) {Triadimefon®}
5077-67-8
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 1-hydroxy-
H3C-CH2-CO-CH2OH
1007-32-5
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 1-phenyl-
C6H5-CH2-CO-CH2-CH3
III-13
H3C-CO-CHOH-CH2OH
II.A-5, III-13
H3C-CO-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5, III-13
H3C-CO-CH=(CH3)2
III-13
Name (per CA Collective Index)
75-97-8
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 3,3-dimethyl-
57011-15-1
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 3,4-dihydroxy-
513-86-0
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 3-hydroxy-
563-80-4
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 3-methyl-
Chapter Table
Selected structures
X-2, XVII.A-4, XXI-3
II.A-5, III-13 III-13
{acetoin}
53872-97-2
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 3-methyl-1-(3-pyridinyl)-
10150-87-5
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 4-(acetyloxy)-
10266-75-8
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(decahydro-5,5,8a-trimethyl-2methylene-1-naphthalenyl)-, [1S-(1D,4aE,8aD)]-
III-13, XVII.B-2 H3C-CO-CH2-CH2-OOC-CH3 H3C
H3C
H3C
III-13, V-3 III-13
O
CH2
CH3
590-90-9
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 4-hydroxy-
H3C-CO-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5, III-13
1823-90-1
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 4-hydroxy-3,3-dimethyl-
H3C-CO-C(CH3)2-CH2OH
II.A-5, III-13
104-20-1
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
34047-39-7
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 4-(methylthio)-
2550-26-7
1
0
0
2-Butanone, 4-phenyl-
50767-77-6
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(2-ethenyl-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexyl)-
60761-23-1
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexyl)-, cis{tetrahydroionone}
III-13, X-2 III-13, XVIII.A-1 H3C-CO-(CH2)2-C6H5
III-13 III-13
H3C
III-13
O
CH3
CH3 CH3
58720-40-4
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(2,3,6-trimethylphenyl)-
III-13
20483-36-7
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadien-1yl)-
III-13
14506-65-1
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-, (4aS-trans)-
CH3 H3C
III-13
O CH3 H3C
CH3
158815-72-6
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-[3,6-dihydro-6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3(1-methylethyl)-1,2-dioxin-3-yl]-, (E)-
II.A-3, III-13, X-2
158815-73-7
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-[3,6-dihydro-6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3(1-methylethyl)-1,2-dioxin-3-yl]-, (Z)-
II.A-3, III-13, X-2
160115-51-5
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-[3,6-dihydro-6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3(1-methylethyl)-1,2-dioxin-3-yl]-, (E)- (+)-
II.A-3, III-13, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1539
11/24/08 1:55:52 PM
1540
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
160115-52-6
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-[3,6-dihydro-6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3(1-methylethyl)-1,2-dioxin-3-yl]-, (Z)- (-)-
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-[5,6-dihydro-3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)-pyran-2-yl]
5471-51-2
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 4-(4-hydroxyphenyl){4-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone}
III-13, X-2
13679-56-6
1
1
1
2-Butanone, 4-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
III-13, X-2
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-2furanyl)-
III-13, X-2
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(2-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-2tetrahydropyranyl)-
III-13, X-2
0
1
0
2-Butanone, 4-(4,5-dihydro-3-methylene-6dimethylmethylene-2-pyranyl)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table II.A-3, III-13, X-2 III-13, IX.A-22
III-13, X-2
CH2 H3C
C
O
CH2CH2-CO
CH3
4170-30-3
1
1
1
2-Butenal
1115-11-3
1
1
1
2-Butenal, 2-methyl-
{crotonaldehyde}
107-86-8
1
0
0
2-Butenal, 3-methyl-
83841-47-8
0
1
0
2-Butenal, 4-(decahydro-2-hydroxy-2,5,5,8atetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-2-methyl-, [1R[1D(E),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
{senecialdehyde}
H 3C-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12
H3C-CH=C(CH3)-CH=O
III-12
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-CH=O H3C
II.A-5, III-12
CH=O
H3C
CH3 OH
H3C
7319-38-2
1
0
0
3-Butenal
625-37-6 23350-58-5
1
0
0
2-Butenamide, (E)-
{crotonamide}
CH3
H2C=CH-CH2-CH=O
III-12
H3C-CH=CH-CO-NH2
XIII-1
1
0
0
2-Butenamide, (Z)-
XIII-1
72693-06-2
1
0
0
2-Butenamide, N,2-dimethyl-
XIII-1
32793-37-6
1
0
0
2-Butenamide, 2-methyl-
28446-58-4
1
0
0
3-Butenamide
18938-03-9
1
0
0
3-Butenamide, 3-methyl-
XIII-1
692-31-9
1
0
0
2-Buten-1-amine, N,N-dimethyl-
XII-2
2524-49-4
1
0
0
3-Buten-1-amine
20173-36-8
1
0
0
3-Buten-1-amine, N,N-dimethyl-4-(3-pyridinyl)-
538-79-4
1
1
1
3-Buten-1-amine, N-methyl-4-(3-pyridinyl){metanicotine}
XIII-1 H2C=CH-CH2-CO-NH2
H2C=CH-CH2-CH2-NH2
XIII-1
XII-2 XII-2, XVII.B-2
NH-CH 3
XII-2, XVII.B-2
N
1
0
0
Butene
I.B-1
1
0
0
Butene, methyl-
106-98-9
1
0
0
1-Butene
H2C=CH-CH2-CH3
I.B-1
563-78-0
1
1
1
1-Butene, 2,3-dimethyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-CH=(CH3)2
I.B-1
558-37-2
1
0
0
1-Butene, 3,3-dimethyl-
H2C=CH-CŁ(CH3)3
I.B-1
563-46-2
1
0
0
1-Butene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.B-1
563-45-1
1
0
0
1-Butene, 3-methyl-
H2C=CH-CH=(CH3)2
I.B-1
I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1540
11/24/08 1:55:52 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1541
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
107-01-7
1
0
0
2-Butene
624-64-6
1
0
0
2-Butene, (E)
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures H3C-CH=CH-CH3 H3C C
H
590-18-1
1
0
0
2-Butene, (Z)-
I.B-1 I.B-1
H C
Chapter Table
CH3
H3C
CH3 C
I.B-1
C
H
H
563-79-1
1
0
0
2-Butene, 2,3-dimethyl-
(H3C)2=C=C=(CH3)2
I.B-1
513-35-9
1
0
0
2-Butene, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=C=CH-CH3
I.B-1
6915-18-0
0
1
0
2-Butenedioic acid
110-17-8
1
1
1
2-Butenedioic acid (E)-
HOOC-CH=CH-COOH {fumaric acid}
C
C
H
110-16-7
1
1
1
2-Butenedioic acid (Z)-
{maleic acid}
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
H
HOOC
COOH
HOOC
COOH C
IV.A-3
C
H
H
623-91-6
0
1
0
2-Butenedioic acid (E)-, diethyl ester {diethyl fumarate}
V-3
141-05-9
1
0
0
2-Butenedioic acid (Z)-, diethyl ester {diethyl maleate}
V-3
21788-49-8
0
1
0
2-Butenedioic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-, (E)-
HOOC
CH3 C
H3C
488-21-1
0
1
0
2-Butenedioic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-, (Z)-
COOH
HOOC
COOH C
624-48-6
1
0
0
2-Butenedioic acid (Z)-, dimethyl ester
28098-80-8
0
1
0
2-Butenedioic acid, 2-ethyl-3-methyl-, (E)-
H3C
CH3
HOOC
C2H5
V-3 C
0
1
0
2-Butenedioic acid, 2-ethyl-3-methyl-, (Z)-
C
COOH
HOOC
0
0
2-Butenedioic acid, 2-methyl-, (E){mesaconic acid}
C2H5
H
HOOC C
1
1
1
2-Butenedioic acid, 2-methyl-, (Z){citraconic acid}
497-06-3 4786-20-3 109-75-1
1
0
0
3-Butene-1,2-diol
1
0
0
2-Butenenitrile
1
0
0
2-Butenenitrile, 3-methyl-
1
0
0
3-Butenenitrile
COOH COOH
HOOC C H3C
IV.A-3
C H
HOCH2-CHOH-CH=CH2 {crotononitrile}
IV.A-3
C
H3C
498-23-7
IV.A-3
C
H3C
1
IV.A-3
COOH
C
498-24-8
IV.A-3
C
H3C
41654-09-5
IV.A-3
C
H3C-CH=CH-CN
II.A-5 XI-2 XI-2
{allyl cyanide}
H2C=CH-CH2-CN
XI-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1541
11/24/08 1:55:53 PM
1542
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
3-Butenenitrile, 3-methyl-
3724-65-0
1
1
1
2-Butenoic acid
107-93-7
1
1
1
2-Butenoic acid, (E)-
XI-2 {crotonic acid} {trans-crotonic acid}
H 3C-CH=CH-COOH H
0
0
2-Butenoic acid, (Z)-
{cis-crotonic acid}
IV.A-3
C
H3C
1
IV.A-3
COOH C
503-64-0
Chapter Table
Selected structures
H
H3C
IV.A-3
COOH C
C
H
H
10544-63-5
0
1
0
2-Butenoic acid (E)-, ethyl ester
V-3
18707-60-3
0
1
0
2-Butenoic acid, methyl ester
13201-46-2
1
1
1
2-Butenoic acid, 2-methyl-, (Z)-
{angelic acid}
IV.A-3
{tiglic acid}
IV.A-3
{ethyl crotonate} H3C-CH=CH-COO-CH3
V-3
80-59-1
1
1
1
2-Butenoic acid, 2-methyl-, (E)-
37526-88-8
0
1
0
2-Butenoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl tiglate}
V-3
39300-45-3
0
1
0
2-Butenoic acid, 2-(1-methylheptyl)-4,6dinitrophenyl ester {Dinocap®}
V-3, XVI-1, XXI-3
7786-34-7
0
1
0
2-Butenoic acid, 3[(dimethoxyphosphinyl)oxy]-, methyl ester {Mevinphos®; Phosdrin®}
H3CO
O
H3CO
O
V-3, XXI-3
COOCH3
P CH3
541-47-9
1
1
1
2-Butenoic acid, 3-methyl-
IV.A-3
32040-41-8
0
1
0
2-Butenoic acid, 4-(formylamino)-4-oxo-, (Z)-
O=CH-NH-CO-CH=CH-COOH
625-38-7
1
0
0
3-Butenoic acid
H2C=CH-CH2-COOH
1617-31-8
1
1
1
3-Butenoic acid, 3-methyl-
2243-53-0
1
1
1
3-Butenoic acid, 4-phenyl-
43000-45-9
1
1
1
1-Buten-1-ol, 3-methyl-
II.A-5
4675-87-0
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
556-82-1
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 3-methyl-
1637-39-4
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 2-methyl-4-(1H-purin-6-ylamino)-, (E)-
II.A-5, XII-2
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 2-methyl-4-(1H-purin-6ylaminoribosyl)-
II.A-5, XII-2
29736-33-2
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 2-methyl-4-[[2-(methylthio)-1H-purin6-yl]amino]-, (E)-
72074-11-4
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 3-(dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)-, [2S[2D(E),3aD,5aE,9aD,9bE]]-
II.A-5, XII-2
87584-34-7
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-ol, 3-(dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9atetramethylnaphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-yl)-, [2R[2D(E),3aE,5aD,9aE,9bD]]-
II.A-5, XII-2
627-27-0
1
0
0
3-Buten-1-ol
H2C=CH-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5
IV.A-3, XIII-1
115-18-4 13215-89-9
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
{styrylacetic acid}
IV.A-3
II.A-5
II.A-5, XII-2, XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 2-methyl-
H2C=CH-CHOH=(CH3)2
II.A-5
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-phenyl-
C6H5-CH=CH-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3-cyclohexadien1-yl)-
OH
II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1542
11/24/08 1:55:53 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1543
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl){3-hydroxy-ȕ-ionol}
II.A-5
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl){4-hydroxy-ȕ-ionol}
II.A-5
27008-60-2 22029-76-1
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl){ȕ-ionol}
OH
II.A-5
472-78-6
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl){Į-ionol}
OH
II.A-5
79925-80-7
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-ol, 4-(6,6-dimethyl-2-methylene-3cyclohexen-1-yl)-
II.A-5
54345-38-9
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,3,6-trimethylphenyl)-, (E)-
III-13
23726-93-4 23696-85-7
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3cyclohexadien-1-yl)-, (E){ȕ-damascenone}
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3cyclohexadien-1-yl){ȕ-damascenone isomer}
III-13
80111-68-8 23770-92-3 35044-68-9
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexenyl){damascone}
III-13
23726-91-2
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1yl)-, (E)-
III-13
23726-92-3 85949-43-5
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1yl)-, (Z){ȕ-damascone}
102488-09-5
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(3-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl){3-hydroxy-ȕ-damascone}
80508-24-3
1
0
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(3-pyridinyl)-
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6trimethycyclohexanyl){4-hydroxydihydro-ȕ-damascone}
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl){4-hydroxy-ȕ-damascone}
CAS No.
56915-02-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
III-13
O
III-13
O
III-13 III-13, XVII.B-2 O
III-13
O
III-13
HO
HO
35734-61-3
1
1
1
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (E)-
II.A-5, III-13
160550-79-8
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl)-, [R-(E)]-
II.A-5, III-13
87562-12-7
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-[3-(formyloxy)-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl]-, (E)-
III-13, V-3
62512-25-8
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-[4-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,6,6trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl]-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
160550-77-6
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1-[4-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,6,6trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl]-, [R-(E)]-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1543
11/24/08 1:55:53 PM
1544
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
495-45-4
0
1
0
2-Buten-1-one, 1,3-diphenyl-
78-94-4
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-one
814-78-8
1
0
0
3-Buten-2-one, 3-methyl-
125-51-5
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 3-methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2cyclohexen-1-yl){D-isomethylionone}
73892-47-4
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-[3-(acetyloxy)-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl]-,[R-(E)]-
50281-40-8
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-[4-(acetyloxy)-2,2,6-trimethyl-7oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl]-, [1R-[1D(E),4E,6D]]-
{methyl vinyl ketone}
Selected structures
III-13 H2C=CH-CO-CH3
III-13
H2C=C(CH3)-CO-CH3
III-13, V-3 H3C
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-[4-(acetyloxy)-2,2,6-trimethyl-7oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl]-, [1S-[1D(E),4D,6D]]-
42569-64-2
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(decahydro-2-hydroxy-2,5,5,8atetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-, [1R[1D(E),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
CH3
0
1
0
CH3
III-13, V-3, X-2 CH3 H3C
OH CH3
CH3
II.A-5, III-13
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(decahydro-2-hydroxy-2,5,5,8atetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-, [1D(E),2D,4aE,8aD](±)-
623-15-4
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2-furanyl)-
14398-34-6
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (E)-
61892-82-8
1
0
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(4-hydroxy-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
50281-42-0
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(4-hydroxy-2,2,6-trimethyl-7oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl)-, [1S-[1D(E),4D,6D]]-
III-13, X-2 II.A-5, III-13 II.A-5, III-13 H3C
CH3
HO
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(4-hydroxy-2,2,6-trimethyl-7oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl)-, [1R-[1D(E),4E,6D]]-
H3C
CH3
CH3
CH3 O
HO
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
O
O
61116-99-2
II.A-5, III-13
O
H3C
54656-80-3
III-13, V-3, X-2
O
CH3 O
0
III-13 III-13
H3C-COO
50281-41-9
Chapter Table
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
O CH3
CH3
72491-46-4
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexen-1-yl){4-hydroxy-ȕ-ionone}
II.A-5, III-13
38963-41-6
1
0
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-2cyclohexen-1-yl){4-hydroxy-D-ionone}
II.A-5, III-13
23120-57-2
1
0
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
66434-99-9
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-, (E)-
122-57-6
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-one, 4-phenyl-
2433-57-0
1
0
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-, (E)-
79-69-6
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,5,6,6-tetramethyl-2-cyclohexen1-yl){Į-irone}
III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2 C6H5-CH=CH-CO-CH3
III-13 III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1544
11/24/08 1:55:54 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1545
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
23267-57-4
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,2,6-trimethyl-7oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl)-
Selected structures
H3C
III-13, X-2
O
CH3
Chapter Table
CH3
O CH3
56681-06-2
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,3,6-trimethylphenyl)-
III-13
1203-08-3
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3cyclohexadien-1-yl){dehydro-E-ionone}
III-13
14398-35-7
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1,3cyclohexadien-1-yl)-, (E)-
III-13
14901-07-6
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1yl){E-ionone}
79-77-6
0
1
0
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1yl)-, (Z)-
127-41-3 8013-90-9
1
1
1
3-Buten-2-one, 4-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1yl)-, (E){D-ionone}
689-97-4
1119-19-3
III-13
O
III-13 III-13
O
1
0
0
1-Buten-3-yne
H2C=CH-CŁCH
1
0
0
Butoxyl radical
OC4H9
1
0
0
tert-Butoxyl radical
I.B-1 XXVII-1 XXVII-1
1
0
0
2-Butynal
H3C-CŁC-CH=O
III-12
1
0
0
Butyne
H-(CH2)n-CŁC-(CH2)(2-n)-H
I.B-1
107-00-6
1
0
0
1-Butyne
H3C-CH2-C ŁCH
I.B-1
503-17-3
1
1
1
2-Butyne
H3C-CŁC-CH3
I.B-1
7440-43-9
1
1
1
Cadmium
Cd
XX-5
7440-70-2
1
1
1
Calcium
Ca
XX-5
14127-61-8
0
1
0
Calcium, ion
Ca
+2
XX-5
1305-78-8
0
1
0
Calcium oxide
CaO
XX-5, XX-6
15124-81-9
0
1
0
Calcium, isotope of mass 49
9064-51-1 54724-00-4
0
1
0
Callose
{1,3-ȕ-D-glucan}
II.A-5, VIII-3
XX-5
101-21-3
0
1
0
Carbamic acid, 3-chlorophenyl-, (1-methylethyl) ester {Chloropropham®}
XXI-3
23103-98-2
0
1
0
Carbamic acid, dimethyl-, 2-(dimethylamino)-5,6dimethyl-4-pyrimidinyl ester {Pirimicarb®}
XXI-3, XVII.B-2, XXI-3
25606-41-1
0
1
0
Carbamic acid, 3-(dimethylamino)propyl-, propyl ester, hydrochloride {Propamocarb hydrochloride®}
51-79-6
1
1
1
Carbamic acid, ethyl ester
{urethan}
598-55-0
0
1
0
Carbamic acid, methyl ester
137-42-8
0
1
0
Carbamic acid, N-methyldithio-, monosodium salt {Metham-sodium®}
594-07-0
0
1
0
Carbamodithioic acid
COO-(CH2)2-CH3 HCl. HN
V-3, XXI-3
(CH2)3-N(CH3)2
H 2N-COO-C2H5 H2N-COO-CH3
V-3 V-3 XVIII.A-1, XX-6, XXI-3
H2N-CSSH XVIII.A-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1545
11/24/08 1:55:54 PM
1546
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9006-42-2
0
1
0
Carbamodithioic acid, 1,2-ethylene(bis-, polymer with ammonia complex of zinc ethylenebisdithiocarbamate {Metiram®}
1114-71-2
0
1
0
Carbamothioic acid, butylethyl-, S-propyl ester {Tillam®; Pebulate®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XXI-3
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
H3C-(CH2)3 H3C-CH2
N-CO-S-(CH2)2-CH3
759-94-4
0
1
0
Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl-, S-ethyl ester {EPTC®}
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
1929-77-7
0
1
0
Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl-, S-propyl ester {Vernolate®}
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
2303-17-5
0
1
0
Carbamothioic acid, S-(2,3,3-trichloro-2-propenyl) bis(1-methylethyl) ester {Triallate®}
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
9012-49-1
0
1
0
Carbamoyltransferase, aspartate
1
0
0
Carbazole
86-74-8
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole
XXII-2 XVII.E-6
{dibenzo[b,d]pyrrole}
8
7 6
2
XVII.E-6
9 5
4539-51-9
1
N H
4
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, alkyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 9-alkyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 2-amino-
XII-2, XVII.E-6
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 2-amino-ethyl-
XII-2, XVII.E-6
30642-38-7
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
14171-85-8
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 1,9-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
24075-47-6
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 2,9-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
24075-48-7
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 3,9-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
24075-49-8
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 4,9-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
71277-85-5
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
86-28-2
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 9-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
27323-29-1
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, methyl-
XVII.E-6
6510-65-2
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 1-methyl-
XVII.E-6
3652-91-3
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
4630-20-0
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
3770-48-7
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 4-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1484-12-4
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, 9-methyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-53-7
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, tetramethyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-51-5
1
0
0
9H-Carbazole, trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
7440-44-0
1
1
1
Carbon
C
XX-5
14762-75-5
1
0
0
Carbon, isotope of mass 14
14
C
XX-5
124-38-9
1
1
1
Carbon dioxide
CO2
XIX-5 XIX-5
14
51-90-1
1
0
0
Carbon- C dioxide
14
75-15-0
1
0
0
Carbon disulfide
CS2
XIX-5
630-08-0
1
0
0
Carbon monoxide
CO
XIX-5
CO2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1546
11/24/08 1:55:54 PM
1547
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
7665-54-5
1
0
0
Carbon- C monoxide
463-58-1
1
0
0
Carbon oxide sulfide (COS)
Name (per CA Collective Index) 14
75-44-5
0
1
0
Carbon oxychloride
2944-05-0
1
0
0
Carbon sulfide
{carbonyl sulfide} {phosgene}
Chapter Table
Selected structures 14
CO
XIX-5
COS
XIX-5
COCl2
XIX-5, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
CS
XIX-5
56-23-5
0
1
0
Carbon tetrachloride
CCl4
10361-29-2
1
0
0
Carbonic acid, ammonium salt
(NH4)2CO3
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XX-6
471-34-1
1
0
0
Carbonic acid, calcium salt
CaCO3
XX-6
13717-00-5
0
1
0
Carbonic acid, magnesium salt
MgCO3
XX-6
584-08-7
0
1
0
Carbonic acid, dipotassium salt
K2CO3
XX-6
497-19-8
0
1
0
Carbonic acid, disodium salt
Na2CO3
XX-6
1066-33-7
1
1
1
Carbonic acid, monoammonium salt {ammonium hydrogen carbonate}
(NH4)HCO3
XX-6
298-14-6
0
1
0
Carbonic acid, monopotassium salt
KHCO3
XX-6
144-55-8
0
1
0
Carbonic acid, monosodium salt
NaHCO3
XX-6
{sodium carbonate}
9031-55-4
0
1
0
Carboxylase
XXII-2
9067-77-0
0
1
0
Carboxylase, phosphoenolpyruvate (phosphate)
XXII-2
37341-54-1
0
1
0
Carboxylase, phosphopyruvate
XXII-2
9027-23-0
0
1
0
Carboxylase, ribulose diphosphate
XXII-2
131201-61-1
0
1
0
Carboxylase, ribulose diphosphate (Nicotiana sylvestris clone NySS4 small subunit precursor reduced)
XXII-2
9031-98-5
0
1
0
Carboxypeptidase
7235-40-7
1
1
1
E,E-Carotene
XXII-2 {E-carotene, all-trans}
H3C
CH3
CH3
H3C
CH3
CH3
CH3
H3C
CH3
CH3
I.C-3
6811-73-0
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene, 13-cis-
I.C-3
68295-84-1
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene, neo
I.C-3
14660-91-4
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene, 6,7-didehydro-5',6'-epoxy-5,5',6,6'tetrahydro-3,3',5-trihydroxy-, (3S,3'S,5R,5'R,6R,6'S,9'-cis)- {neoxanthin}
II.A-5
30743-41-0
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene, 6,7-didehydro-5',6'-epoxy-5,5',6,6'tetrahydro-3,3',5-trihydroxy-, (3S,3'S,5R,5'R,6R,6'S)-
II.A-5
29472-68-2
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene-3,3'-diol
{zeaxanthin}
II.A-5
144-68-3
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene-3,3'-diol, (3R,3'R)-
{zeaxanthin}
II.A-5
126-29-4
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene-3,3'-diol, 5,6:5',6'-diepoxy-5,5',6,6'tetrahydro-, (3S,3'S,5R,5'R,6S,6'S)- {violaxanthin}
H3C
CH3
CH 3
H3C
CH3
O HO
CH3
OH
O
CH3
H3C
CH3
CH 3
II.A-5, X-2
26927-07-1
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene-3,3'-diol, 5,6:5',6'-diepoxy-5,5',6,6'tetrahydro-, (3S,3'S,5R,5'R,6S,6'S,9-cis)-
II.A-5, X-2
68831-78-7
0
1
0
E,E-Carotene-3,3'-diol, 5,6-epoxy-5,6-dihydro-, (3S,3'R,5R,6S,9-cis)-
II.A-5, X-2
472-70-8
0
1
0
E,E-Caroten-3-ol, (3R)-
7488-99-5
0
1
0
E,H-Carotene, (6'R)-
{cryptoxanthin}
II.A-5
{D-carotene}
I.C-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1547
11/24/08 1:55:55 PM
1548
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
17539-43-4
0
1
0
E,H-Carotene-3,3'-diol, 5,6-epoxy-5,6-dihydro-
II.A-5, X-2
28368-08-3
0
1
0
E,H-Carotene-3,3'-diol, 5,6-epoxy-5,6-dihydro-, (3S,3'R,5R,6S,6'R)-
II.A-5, X-2
512-29-8
0
1
0
E,H-Carotene-3,3'-diol, 5,8-epoxy-5,8-dihydro-, (3S,3'R,5R,6'R,8R){flavoxanthin}
II.A-5, X-2
127-40-2
0
1
0
E,H-Carotene-3,3'-diol, (3R,3'R,6'R){xanthophyll; lutein}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
H3C
HO
502-65-8
1
1
1
540-04-5
0
1
0
\,\-Carotene, 7,7',8,8',11,11',12,12'-octahydro{phytoene}
540-05-6
0
1
0
\,\-Carotene, 7,7',8,8',11,12-hexahydro{phytofluene}
CH3
CH3
H3C
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
OH
H3C
CH3
II.A-5
{lycopene}
\,\-Carotene
I.C-3 I.C-3
I.C-3 9001-05-2
0
1
0
Catalase
28231-03-0
0
1
0
Cedrenol
XXII-2 OH
H3C
CH3 CH3
CH3
CH3
H3C
OH
II.A-5 528-50-7
0
1
0
Cellobiose
9012-54-8
0
1
0
Cellulase
9004-34-6
II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2 XXII-2
0
1
0
Cellulose
0
1
0
Cellulose, labeled with C
II.A-5, VIII-3
9000-11-7
0
1
0
Cellulose, carboxymethyl ether
II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2
9004-57-3
0
1
0
Cellulose, ethyl ether
II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2
9004-67-5
0
1
0
Cellulose, methyl ether
7440-45-1
1
1
1
Cerium
Ce
XX-5 XX-5
14
14
{cellulose- C}
XXV-29
II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2
14762-78-8
0
1
0
Cerium, isotope of mass 144
144
7440-46-2
1
1
1
Cesium
Cs
XX-5
13967-70-9
1
1
1
Cesium, isotope of mass 134
134
XX-5
137
Ce Cs
10045-97-3
1
1
1
Cesium, isotope of mass 137
9001-06-3
0
1
0
Chitinase
Cs
XXII-2
XX-5
131554-01-3
0
1
0
Chitinase (Nicotiana tabacum samsun isoenzyme reduced)
XXII-2
148348-37-2
0
1
0
Chitinase (Nicotiana tabacum xanthi clone pBSCL226 isoenzyme III precursor reduced)
XXII-2
152619-17-5
0
1
0
Chitinase (tobacco basic isoenzyme III precursor reduced)
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1548
11/24/08 1:55:55 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1549
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
128285-05-2
0
1
0
Chitinase (tobacco clone lambda.CHN17 basic isoenzyme precursor reduced)
XXII-2
128285-06-3
0
1
0
Chitinase (tobacco clone lambda.CHN17 basic isoenzyme reduced)
XXII-2
159520-75-9
0
1
0
Chitinase (tobacco clone 59 gene chi-V precursor reduced)
XXII-2
16887-00-6
1
1
1
Chloride
Cl
7782-50-5
1
1
1
Chlorine
Cl2
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
14158-34-0
0
1
0
Chlorine, isotope of mass 38
38
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
Name (per CA Collective Index)
-1
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
Cl2
9025-96-1
0
1
0
Chlorophyllase
42617-16-3
0
1
0
Chlorophyll a
{also listed under Magnesium} {also listed under Magnesium}
Chapter Table
Selected structures
XXII-2 XX-6, XVII.A-5
519-62-0
0
1
0
Chlorophyll b
1406-65-1
0
1
0
Chlorophylls a + b
XX-6, XVII.A-5
14897-06-4
0
1
0
Chlorophyllide
XX-6, XVII.A-5
11006-34-1
0
1
0
Chlorophyllin
XX-6, XVII.A-5
119973-28-3
1
0
0
Chol-3-ene, 23-methyl-, (5D)-
747-90-0 481-21-0
XX-6, XVII.A-5
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cholesta-3,5-diene
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cholesta-3,5-diene, 24-ethyl-
I.C-1
0
1
0
Cholestane, (5D)-
{coprostane}
H3C CH3 CH3 CH3
CH3
I.C-1 1
0
0
119973-28-3
1
0
0
Chol-3-ene, 23-methyl-, (5D)-
I.C-1
747-90-0
1
0
0
Cholesta-3,5-diene
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cholesta-3,5-diene, 24-ethyl-
0
1
0
Cholestane, (5D)-
481-21-0
Cholesta-3,5,22-triene, 24-methyl-
I.C-1
I.C-1 {coprostane}
H3C CH3 CH3 CH3
CH3
I.C-1 1
0
0
Cholesta-3,5,22-triene, 24-methyl-
I.C-1
96443-01-5
1
0
0
Cholest-4-en-3-ol, 4-methyl- (3D)
II.B-2
57-88-5
1
1
1
Cholest-5-en-3-ol (3E)-
{cholesterol}
CH3 CH3 CH3
CH3 CH3
HO
II.B-2 0
1
0
Cholest-5-en-3-ol (3E)-, 9,12,15-octadecatrienoate, [3E(Z,Z,Z),22E]{cholesteryl linolenate}
II.B-2, V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1549
11/24/08 1:55:56 PM
1550
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
0
1
0
Cholest-5-en-3-ol (3E)-, 9-octadecenoate, [3E(Z),22E]{cholesteryl oleate}
II.B-2, V-3
0
1
0
Cholest-5-en-3-ol (3E)-, octadecanoate, (3E,22E){cholesteryl stearate}
II.B-2, V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
474-77-1
0
1
0
Cholest-5-en-3-ol, (3D)-)
1253-88-9
0
1
0
II.B-2
Cholest-5-en-3-ol, 4,4-dimethyl-, (3E)-
II.B-2
6036-58-4
0
1
0
Cholest-7-en-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
{epicholesterol}
481-25-4
0
1
0
Cholest-7-en-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
6062-47-1
0
1
0
Cholest-8-en-3-ol, 14-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
5241-24-7
0
1
0
Cholest-8-en-3-ol, 4,4-dimethyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
5241-22-5
0
1
0
Cholest-8-en-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
100017-41-2
0
1
0
Cholest-9(11)-en-3-ol, 14-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
7440-47-3
1
1
1
Chromium
Cr
XX-5
51
XX-5
14392-02-0
1
1
1
Chromium, isotope of mass 51
218-01-9
1
1
1
Chrysene
1
0
0
Chrysene, alkyl-
1
0
0
Chrysene, 6-amino-
2642-98-0
II.B-2 Cr
{1,2-benzophenanthrene}
I.E-6
I.E-6 I.E-6, XII-2
41637-92-7
1
0
0
Chrysene, dimethyl-
71277-86-6
1
0
0
Chrysene, ethyl-
I.E-6
71277-87-7
1
0
0
Chrysene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
41637-90-5
1
0
0
Chrysene, methyl-
I.E-6
3351-28-8
1
0
0
Chrysene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
3351-32-4
1
0
0
Chrysene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
3351-31-3
1
0
0
Chrysene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
3351-30-2
1
0
0
Chrysene, 4-methyl-
I.E-6
3697-24-3
1
0
0
Chrysene, 5-methyl-
I.E-6
1705-85-7
1
0
0
Chrysene, 6-methyl-
I.E-6
7496-02-8
1
0
0
Chrysene, 6-nitro-
71277-88-8
1
0
0
Chrysene, pentamethyl-
I.E-6
71277-89-9
1
0
0
Chrysene, propyl-
I.E-6
71277-90-2
1
0
0
Chrysene, tetramethyl-
I.E-6
60826-77-9
1
0
0
Chrysene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
253-66-7
1
0
0
Cinnoline
63863-33-2
1
0
0
Cinnoline, dihydro-
14722-38-4
1
0
0
Cinnoline, 4-methyl-
7440-48-4
1
1
1
Cobalt
Co
XX-5
60
XX-5
10198-40-0
{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
1
1
1
Cobalt, isotope of mass 60
1
0
0
Cobalt carbonyl
I.E-6
XVI-1
{1,2-diazanaphthalene}
XVII.E-6
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6 Co
XX-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1550
11/24/08 1:55:56 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1551
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
85-61-0
0
1
0
Coenzyme A
XXII-2
604-98-8
0
1
0
Coenzyme A, S-(hydrogen butanedioate)
XXII-2
7440-50-8
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
1
1
Copper
0
1
0
Copper, ion
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XX-5 Cu
+2
XX-5
1317-39-1
0
1
0
Copper oxide
1332-40-7 1332-65-6
0
1
0
Copper oxychloride
XX-6
8012-69-9
0
1
0
Copper oxychloride sulfate
7758-98-7
0
1
0
Copper sulfate
191-07-1
1
1
1
Coronene
I.E-6
64760-15-2
1
0
0
Coronene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
{RAME}
XXI-3 Cu2Cl(OH)3 + Cu4(OH)6(SO4)
XXI-3 XXI-3
13119-86-3
1
0
0
Coronene, methyl-
115742-70-6
0
1
0
Cryptogein
156-62-7
0
1
0
Cyanamide, calcium salt
1467-79-4
1
0
0
Cyanamide, dimethyl-
(CH3)2=N-CN
590-28-3
0
1
0
Cyanic acid, potassium salt
K-OCN
57-12-5
1
0
0
Cyanide ion
CN
1
0
0
Cyanide radical
CN
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Cyanide radical {acrylonitrile radical}
C3H2N
XXVII-1
1
0
0
Cyanide radical
C3H4N
XXVII-1
94185-89-4
0
1
0
Cyclase, farnesyl pyrophosphate
XXII-2
60485-38-3
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclocholest-24-en-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
34443-88-4
0
1
0
9,19-Cycloergost-24(28)-en-3-ol, 14-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
469-39-6
0
1
0
9,19-Cycloergost-24(28)-en-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
34347-58-5
0
1
0
9,19-Cycloergostan-3-ol, 14-methyl-, (3E,5D,9E)-
II.B-2
59780-40-4
0
1
0
9,19-Cycloergostan-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D,24[)-
II.B-2
0
1
0
2,4-Cycloheptadien-1-one, 2,6,6-trimethyl{eucarvone}
III-13
1
0
0
Cycloheptanone
502-42-1
I.E-6 XXII-2 Ca=N-CN -
XI-2, XXI-3 XI-2 XX-6, XXI-3
-1
XI-2
{suberone}
III-13 O
544-25-2
1
0
0
1,3,5-Cycloheptatriene
29797-09-9
1
0
0
Cyclohexadiene
592-57-4
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclohexadiene
{tropilidene}
I.C-1
I.C-1 1 2
6
3
I.C-1
5 4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1551
11/24/08 1:55:56 PM
1552
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
99-86-5
1
1
1
1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl){D-terpinene}
99-83-2
1
1
1
1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl){D-phellandrene}
I.C-1
4221-98-1
1
1
1
1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (R){D-phellandrene}
I.C-1
116-26-7
0
1
0
1,3-Cyclohexadiene-1-carboxaldehyde, 2,6,6trimethyl{safranal}
III-12
0
1
0
1,3-Cyclohexadiene, 1,2,6,6-tetramethyl-
I.C-1
0
1
0
1,4-Cyclohexadiene
628-41-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
I.C-1
I.C-1
1 2
6
3
5 4
99-85-4
0
1
0
1,4-Cyclohexadiene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
617-12-9
0
1
0
1,5-Cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylic acid, 3-[(1carboxyethenyl)oxy]-4-hydroxy-, (3R-E)-
I.C-1 II.A-5, IV.A-3
1
0
0
Cyclohexadienedione
106-51-4
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione
106-34-3
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, compd. with 1,4benzenediol (1:1)
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3-dihydro-
IX.B-2
1
1
1
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3-dihydro-2,2,6trimethyl-
IX.B-2
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3-dimethoxy-5(3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35,39-decamethyl2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34,38-tetracontadecenyl)-6methyl{ubiquinone-10}
303-98-0
{quinone} {p-benzoquinone}
IX.B-2 O
IX.B-2
O
IX.A-22, IX.B-2
(
H3CO
IX.B-2
CH3
O H3CO
)
H
10
CH3 O
137-18-8
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,5-dimethyl-
IX.B-2
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,6-bis(1,1dimethylethyl)-
IX.B-2
527-61-7
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,6-dimethyl-
IX.B-2
4299-57-4
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3-dimethyl-5(3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl2,6,10,14,18,22, 26,30,34-hexatriacontanonaenyl), (all-E){plastoquinone}
IX.B-2
606-06-4
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2-(3,7-dimethyl-2,6octadienyl)-5,6-dimethoxy-3-methyl-, (E)-
IX.B-2, X-2
2474-72-8
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, IX.B-2
3361-10-2
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2-(3-hydroxy3,7,11,15-tetramethylhexadecyl)-6-methyl-
II.A-5, IX.B-2
7559-04-8
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2-(3-hydroxy3,7,11,15-tetramethylhexadecyl)-3,5,6-trimethyl-, [3R- (3R*,7R*,11R*)]-
II.A-5, IX.B-2
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2-methoxy-
553-97-9
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2-methyl-
IX.B-2
527-17-3
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-
IX.B-2
IX.B-2, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1552
11/24/08 1:55:57 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1553
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
935-92-2
1
0
0
2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione, 2,3,5-trimethyl-
583-63-1
1
1
1
3,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,2-dione
Name (per CA Collective Index)
{o-benzoquinone}
Selected structures
Chapter Table IX.B-2 IX.B-2
O O
0
1
0
2,4-Cyclohexadien-1-one, 2,6,6-trimethyl-
0
1
0
2,5-Cyclohexadien-1-one, 2,6-bis(1,1dimethylethyl)-4-hydoxy-4-methyl-
110-82-7
1
0
0
Cyclohexane
I.C-1
27195-67-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, dimethyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, ethyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, methyl-
I.C-1
108-87-2
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, propyl-
I.C-1
27013-35-0
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, methyl-(1-methylethenyl)-
I.C-1
29887-60-3
0
1
0
Cyclohexane, 1,2-dimethoxy-, (E)
X-2
590-66-9
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1,1-dimethyl-
I.C-1
591-21-9
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1,3-dimethyl-
I.C-1
33880-83-0
0
1
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(1methylethenyl)-, (1D,2E,4E)-
I.C-1
515-13-9
0
1
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethenyl-1-methyl-2,4-bis(1methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1D,2E,4E)]-
I.C-1
62238-31-7
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl-, (Z)-
I.C-1
62238-29-3
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethyl-1,3-dimethyl-, (E)-
I.C-1
62238-30-6
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl-, (Z)-
I.C-1
62238-32-8
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethyl-1,4-dimethyl-, (E)-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-ethyl-2-propyl-
I.C-1
608-73-1
1
1
1
Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro-
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
319-84-6
1
1
1
Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro{Į Lindane®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
319-85-7
1
1
1
Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro{ȕ Lindane®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
58-89-9
1
1
1
Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro-, (1D,2D,3E,4D,5D,6E){Ȗ-Lindane®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
319-86-8
1
1
1
Cyclohexane, 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro{į Lindane®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
13828-34-7
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-methyl-3-(1-methylethylidene)-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl){p-menthane}
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1,2,4,5-tetraethyl-
I.C-1
3073-66-3
1
0
0
Cyclohexane, 1,1,3-trimethyl-
I.C-1
2043-61-0
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde
III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1553
11/24/08 1:55:57 PM
1554
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
34214-77-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]trihydroxy, (1D,3D,4D,5E)-
77-95-2 562-73-2
1
1
1
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxy{quinic acid}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-2, IV.A-3, IX.A-22
II.A-2, IV.A-3
HO OH HO COOH HO
36413-60-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxy-, (1D,3D,4D,5E)-
27044-07-1
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxy-, monoester with 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2propenoic acid, (1D,3D,4D,5E)-
1899-29-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 1,3,4-trihydroxy-5-[[3(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2propenyl]oxy]-, (1D,3D,4D,5E){3-O-feruloylquinic acid}
II.A-2, IV.A-3 II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
O OCH3
O
OH
HO OH
HOOC OH
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2 1899-30-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 1,3,4-trihydroxy-5-[[3(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-, [1S(1D,3D,4D,5E)]{p-coumaroylquinic acid}
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
2450-53-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3,5-bis[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4dihydroxy-, [1R-(1D,3D,4D,5E)]-
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
15016-60-1
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy-, [1R- [1D,3E(Z),4D,5D]]-
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
15076-00-3
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy-, [1R- [1D,3E(E),4D,5D]]-
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
327-97-9 93451-46-8
1
1
1
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy-, [1S-(1D,3E,4D,5D)]{chlorogenic acid; 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid}
O OH
O OH HOOC
OH
OH OH
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3 906-33-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy-, [1R-(1D,3D,4D,5E)]-
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
1
1
1
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 5-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy{neochlorogenic acid; 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid}
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
55635-13-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-2,4-dioxo3-(1-((2-propenyloxy)amino)butylidene)-, methyl ester, sodium salt {Alloxydim-sodium®}
24321-18-4
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4-dioxo-1,5cyclohexadien-1-yl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5trihydroxy-
III-13, XXI-3
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1554
11/24/08 1:55:58 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1555
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
70898-22-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 3-[[3-[4-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-3-hydroxyphenyl]-1-oxo-2propenyl]oxy]-1,4,5-trihydroxy-, [1S(1D,3E,4D,5D)]-
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
17608-52-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 4-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,3,5trihydroxy{4-O-caffeoylquinic acid}
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
905-99-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 4-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-1,3,5trihydroxy-, (1D,3D,4D,5E)-
II.A-2, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22, X-2
82612-14-4
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclohexanediol, 4-[1-(acetyloxy)-1methylethyl]-1-methyl-, (1D,2E,4D)-(±)-
112019-00-8
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclohexanediol, 2-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-1,3,3trimethyl-, [1R-[1D,2D,2(1E,3S*)]]-
38713-11-0
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclohexanediol, 1,3,3-trimethyl-
88663-71-2
0
1
0
1,4-Cyclohexanediol, 1-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-4methyl-, 4-acetate, (E)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
II.A-2, V-3 II.A-2 II.A-2 CH3 OH
HO
II.A-2, V-3
CH3
H3C-COO
88663-72-3
Chapter Table
CH3
0
1
0
1,4-Cyclohexanediol, 1-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-4methyl-, 4-acetate, (Z)-
II.A-2, V-3
0
1
0
1,4-Cyclohexanediol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, 1-acetate, (Z)-
II.A-2
59632-87-0
0
1
0
1,4-Cyclohexanediol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, 1-acetate, (E)-
II.A-2
765-87-7
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclohexanedione
III-13
O
O
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclohexanedione, 4-methyl-
III-13
3008-43-3
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclohexanedione, 6-methyl-
III-13
1919-64-8
0
1
0
1,3-Cyclohexanedione, 5,5-dimethyl-2-propyl-
III-13
1193-55-1
1
1
1
1,3-Cyclohexanedione, 2-methyl-
III-13
637-88-7
1
1
1
1,4-Cyclohexanedione
20547-99-3
1
1
1
1,4-Cyclohexanedione, 2,2,6-trimethyl{4-ketodihydroisophorone}
13487-27-9
0
1
0
Cyclohexanemethanol, D-methyl-, acetate
O
O
III-13 III-13 V-3
CH3 OOC-CH3
639-99-6
0
1
0
Cyclohexanemethanol, 4-ethenyl-D,D,4-trimethyl-3(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R-(1D,3D,4E)]-
II.A-5
2451-01-6
1
0
0
Cyclohexanemethanol, 4-hydroxy-D,D,4-trimethyl-, monohydrate, cis{terpin hydrate}
II.A-5
104153-60-8
0
1
0
1,2,3-Cyclohexanetriol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5
108-93-0
1
0
0
Cyclohexanol
II.A-5
60759-94-6
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-2,2-dimethyl6-methylene-
II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1555
11/24/08 1:55:58 PM
1556
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
586-81-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)-
II.A-5
10235-63-9
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)-, acetate
V-3
22567-22-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R(1D,2D,5E)]-
II.A-5
51773-45-6
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R(1D,2D,5D)]-
II.A-5
88437-32-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 4-(2-hydroxy-1-methylethylidene)-1methyl-, 1-acetate
89-79-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R(1D,2E,5D)]-
1490-04-6
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
89-78-1
1
1
1
Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-, (1D,2E,5D){menthol}
V-3 II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5
CH3
OH H3C
CH3
1
1
1
Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-, 14 14 (1D,2E,5D)- C(U), labeled with C 14 { C-menthol (U)}
II.A-5
2216-51-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1D,2E,5D)]-
II.A-5
16409-45-3
0
1
0
Cyclohexanol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-, acetate
V-3
108-94-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexanone
III-13
2816-57-1
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2,6-dimethyl-
III-13
71607-84-6
1
0
0
Cyclohexanone, ethenylmethyl-
III-13
50874-76-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, trimethyl-
III-13
7500-42-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-
38462-22-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-(1-mercapto-1-methylethyl)-5methyl-
II.A-5, III-13 III-13, XVIII.A-1
O CH3 H3C
SH CH3
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-
III-13
7764-50-3
1
0
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-
III-13
6909-25-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-, (2Scis)-
III-13
5948-04-9
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-, trans-
III-13
491-07-6
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (E){dl-isomenthone}
III-13
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
15189-14-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-
III-13
2408-37-9
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2,2,6-trimethyl{2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexanone}
III-13
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 2,4,4-trimethyl-3-(1-oxobutyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
Cyclohexanone, 3-methyl-
III-13
591-24-2
{two isomers}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1556
11/24/08 1:55:58 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1557
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
60026-21-3
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 3,3,5-trimethyl-4-(3-oxo-1-butenyl)-
III-13
123716-12-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexanone, 4-(1-methylethyl)-3-(2-oxopropyl)-
III-13
72491-45-3
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,3,5-trimethyl-
III-13
20548-02-1
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 4-hydroxy-2,2,6-trimethyl-
III-13
20548-03-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 4-hydroxy-3,3,5-trimethyl-
III-13
529-00-0
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethenyl){isopulegone}
III-13
89-80-5
1
1
1
Cyclohexanone, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-, trans{menthone}
III-13
89-82-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexanone, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethylidene)-, (R){pulegone}
III-13
110-83-8
1
0
0
Cyclohexene
74423-06-6
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 2-(1,3-butadienyl)-1,3,3-trimethyl-, (E){megastigmatriene}
I.C-1 H3C
I.C-1
CH3 CH2 CH3
70941-91-2
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 6-(3,7-dimethyl-1,3,5,7-octatetraenyl)1,5,5-trimethyl-, (E,E,E)-
I.C-1
495-62-5
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 4-(1,5-dimethyl-4-hexenylidene)-1methyl{bisabolene}
I.C-1
25168-07-4
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, ethenyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 3-ethenyl-1,3-di(4',8',12'trimethyltridecyl)-
I.C-1
100-40-3
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 4-ethenyl-
I.C-1
20307-84-0
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 4-ethenyl-4-methyl-3-(1methylethenyl)-1-(1-methylethyl)- {į-elemene}
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 4-ethenyl-1,4-di(4',8',12'trimethyltridecyl)-
I.C-1
1611-21-8
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 5-ethenyl-1,5-dimethyl-
I.C-1
591-49-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-
I.C-1
38738-60-2
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-3-(1-methylethenyl){sylvestrene}
I.C-1
138-86-3
1
1
1
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl){limonene; p-mentha-1,8-diene}
5989-27-5
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, (R){d-limonene}
I.C-1
5502-88-5
1
1
1
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
I.C-1
586-62-9
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene){terpinolene}
I.C-1
1461-27-4
I.C-1
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 1-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-, (R)-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 3-methyl-
I.C-1
586-67-4
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 4-methyl-1-(1-methylethenyl){3,8-menthadiene}
I.C-1
5256-65-5
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-
I.C-1
23733-91-7
0
1
0
Cyclohexene, 3-methylene-4-(1-methylethenyl)-, (R)-
I.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1557
11/24/08 1:55:59 PM
1558
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 3-(1"-methylene-5",9",13"trimethyltetradecyl)-1-(4',8',12'-trimethyltridecyl)-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclohexene, 4-(1"-methylene-5",9",13"trimethyltetradecyl)-1-(4',8',12'-trimethyltridecyl)-
I.C-1
1192-88-7
1
0
0
1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde
III-12
432-25-7
0
1
0
1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde, 2,6,6-trimethyl{ȕ-cyclocitral}
III-12
471-90-9
0
1
0
1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid, 2,6,6-trimethyl{cyclogeranic acid}
IV.A-3
138-59-0
0
1
0
1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, [3R-(3D,4D,5E)]{shikimic acid}
6082-44-6
0
1
0
1-Cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid, 3-[[3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]oxy]-4,5dihydroxy-, (3D,4D,5E)-
38073-89-1
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexene-1-carboxylic acid, 6-(1-methylethyl)-, cis-
IV.A-3
19894-91-8
0
1
0
1-Cyclohexene-1,4-dimethanol, D4,D4-dimethyl-, (S)-
II.A-5
CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3, V-3, IX.A-22
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexene, 1-(2-oxopropyl) 3,5,5-trimethyl-
35692-98-9
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexene-1,4-dione, 2-hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-
III-13
1125-21-9
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexene-1,4-dione, 2,6,6-trimethyl{4-ketoisophorone; 4-oxoisophorone}
88663-73-4
0
1
0
1-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, 4-(acetyloxy)-D,D,4trimethyl-
42370-41-2
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, 5-hydroxy-D,D,4trimethyl-, trans-
II.A-5
498-71-5
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, 5-hydroxy-D,D,4trimethyl-
II.A-5
98-55-5
1
1
1
3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, D,D,4-trimethyl{D-terpineol}
II.A-5, III-13 III-13 II.A-5, V-3
CH3 H3C
II.A-5
OH CH3
10482-56-1
1
1
1
3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, D,D,4-trimethyl-, (S)-
II.A-5
80-26-2
1
1
1
3-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, D,D,4-trimethyl-, acetate {D-terpinyl acetate}
II.A-5, V-3
822-67-3
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol
II.A-5
536-30-1
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (1SZ)-
II.A-5
27185-80-4
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 3-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-2,4,4trimethyl-
II.A-5
470-99-5
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 3,5,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-methylene-
II.A-5
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl{megastigmatrienol}
II.A-5
13215-90-2
{isophorol}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1558
11/24/08 1:55:59 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1559
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
62660-03-1
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-
H3C 5
.
OH
CH3
II.A-5
CH3
4 3
1
HO
CH3
2
H3C
CH3
OH 7
6
9
CH3
8
3
5
HO
CH3
4
Nomenclature by Enzell et al. 68831-80-1
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, [1S-[1D,4D(1E,3S*)]]-
II.A-5
68831-81-2
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, [1S-[1D,4D(1E,3R*)]]-
II.A-5
78830-91-8
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-6,6dimethyl-2-methylene-
CH3 5 4
33759-63-6
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-
H3C
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, (E)-
31162-45-5 58023-72-6
1
1
1
3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butynyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-
6
3
1 2
CH3
OH CH2
II.A-5
OH
CH3
CH3 HO
121269-03-2
II.A-5
OH
H3C
CH3
II.A-5 II.A-5 OH
HO
562-74-3
1
1
1
3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 4-methyl-1-(1-methylethyl){4-carvomenthol}
II.A-5
23811-18-9
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-ol, 3,5,5-trimethyl-, (±)-
II.A-5
930-68-7
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one
74051-80-2
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-[1-(ethoximino)butyl]-5-[2(ethylthio)-propyl]-3-hydroxy{Sethoxydim®}
III-13
10316-66-2
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
490-03-9
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl{diosphenol}
II.A-5, III-13
65310-49-1
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1121-18-2
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-methyl-
III-13
99-49-0
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl){l-carvone}
III-13
2244-16-8
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl){d-carvone}
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2-propyl-3-methyl- {2 isomers}
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2,4,4-trimethyl-3-(1,3butadienyl)-
III-13
II.A-5, III-13, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1559
11/24/08 1:56:00 PM
1560
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
27185-77-9
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2,4,4-trimethyl-3-(3-oxo-1butenyl)-
III-13
20013-73-4
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 2,6,6-trimethyl-
III-13
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
5220-49-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-amino-
67401-25-6
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-(2-butenyl)-2,4,4-trimethyl-, (Z)-
III-13, XII-2 III-13
1193-18-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methyl-
III-13
89-81-6
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl){D-piperitone}
III-13
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methyl-2-(1,3-pentadienyl)-
III-13
78-59-1
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl{isophorone}
III-13
133304-85-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,4-dimethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
2748-09-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5-dimethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
2748-08-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,6-dimethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
41577-83-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
51771-56-3
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl-2-(1methylethenyl)-
III-13
53398-09-7
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-(1-oxo-2butenyl)-
III-13
60026-25-7
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-(1-propenyl)-
III-13
33601-06-8
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-(3-oxo-1butenyl)-, (R)-(+)-
III-13
20548-00-9
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-methylene{methyleneisophorone}
III-13
5896-02-6
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(1,3-butadienyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-
III-13 O
38818-55-2
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(1,3-butadienyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, (E)-
77761-55-8
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2,3-dihydroxybutylidene)3,5,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13
77842-24-1
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2,3-dihydroxybutylidene)3,5,5-trimethyl{isomer}
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(1,3-butadienyl)-3,5,5triethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(1,3-butadienyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2-butenyl)-3,5,5-trimethyl-
III-13
13215-88-8
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-
III-13
5164-78-3
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-, (E,E){megastigmatrienone} {trans-, trans-K1a}
5896-02-6
5298-13-5
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-, (E,Z){trans-,cis-K2a}
III-13
III-13 O
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1560
11/24/08 1:56:00 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1561
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
5492-79-5
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-, (Z,E){cis-, trans-K1b}
III-13
5164-79-4
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(2-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-, (Z,Z){cis-, cis-K2b}
III-13
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-butenylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-
III-13
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-ethyl-
III-13
62512-22-5
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-[3-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)1-butenyl]-3,5,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
77699-19-5
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-[3-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)1-butenyl]-3,5,5-trimethyl-, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
159813-37-3
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-[3-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)1-butenyl]-3,5,5-trimethyl-, [4R-[4R*(1E,3S*)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
54835-70-0
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-[3-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)1-butenyl]-4-hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-, [R-[R*,S*(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
62512-23-6
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-[3-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)butyl]-3,5,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
91048-13-4
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-[3-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)butylidene]-3,5,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
34318-21-3
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl{4-keto-D-ionol}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
H3C
II.A-5, III-13
OH
CH3
Chapter Table
CH3 CH3
O
52210-15-8
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13
68759-08-0
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, [S-[R*,S*-(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13
60047-19-0
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxybutyl)-3,5,5trimethyl{4-ketodihydro-D-ionol}
II.A-5, III-13
36151-02-7
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxybutyl)-3,5,5trimethyl-, [R-(R*,R*)]-
II.A-5, III-13
60026-24-6
1
1
1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(3-hydroxybutylidene)-3,5,5trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13
19620-37-2
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl-
14203-59-9
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13
24427-77-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-4-(3-hydroxy-1butenyl)-3,5,5-trimethyl{vomifoliol}
II.A-5, III-13
II.A-5, III-13
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
51171-72-3
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-phenyl-
III-13
1073-13-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4,4-dimethyl-
III-13
5715-25-3
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4,5-dimethyl-
7712-46-1
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 5-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2methyl-
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
O
OH
56691-69-1
0
1
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 5-[1-(acetyloxy)-1methylethyl]-2-methyl-, (R)-
499-74-1
1
0
0
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 6-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13, V-3 III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1561
11/24/08 1:56:00 PM
1562
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 4096-34-8
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
1
0
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-one
III-13
0
1
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-(1-butenyl)-3,5,5-trimethyl-
III-13
471-01-2
1
0
0
3-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3,5,5-trimethyl-
III-13
4657-58-3
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanostan-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
26955-76-0
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanostan-3-ol, 24,25-epoxy-, (3E)-
II.B-2
1449-09-8
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanostan-3-ol, 24-methylene-, (3E)-
469-38-5
1
0
0
9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2 CH3
{cycloartenol}
CH3
CH3 CH3 HO H3C
CH3
CH3
II.B-2 25692-13-1
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanost-24-en-3-ol, 24-methyl-, (3E)-
II.B-2
51088-90-5
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanost-25-en-3-ol, 24-methyl-, (3E,24S)-
II.B-2
511-61-5
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanost-25-en-3-ol, 24-methyl-, (3E,24S)-
II.B-2
124713-05-9
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclolanost-5-en-3-ol, 24-methylene-, (3E)-
II.B-2
629-20-9
1
0
0
1,3,5,7-Cyclooctatetraene
I.C-1
149331-19-1
0
1
0
Cyclononane, 1,1,4,4,7,7-hexamethyl-
I.C-1
202-98-2
1
0
0
4H-Cyclopenta[def]chrysene {4,5-methylenechrysene}
I.E-6
126458-49-9
0
1
0
4HCyclopenta[3',4']cycloocta[1',2':1,5]cyclopent[1,2b]oxiren-4-one, 1,2,2a,5,6,8,9,10,10a,10bdecahydro-2,6,10a-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [2aS-(2aD,3aS*,6E,8E,10aE,10bE)]-
III-13
86154-08-7
0
1
0
4HCyclopenta[3',4']cycloocta[1',2':1,5]cyclopent[1,2b]oxiren-4-one, 1,2,2a,7,7a,8,9,10,10a,10bdecahydro-2a,6,10a-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, (2aD,3aR*,7aE,8E,10aE,10bE)-
III-13
142750-43-4
0
1
0
Cyclopentacycloundecene, tetradecahydro-1,4,8trimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-
I.C-1
142750-40-1
0
1
0
4,10(1H,5H)-Cyclopentacycloundecenedione, 2,3,3a,6,7,11,12,12a-octahydro-1,3,12-trihydroxy3,8,12-trimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (1R*,3S*,3aR*,5S*,8Z,12R*,12aR*)-(-)-
III-13
541-91-3
0
1
0
Cyclopentadecanone, 3-methyl-
III-13
542-92-7
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, dimethyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, ethyl-
I.C-1
26519-92-6
{pyropentylene}
I.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1562
11/24/08 1:56:01 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1563
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
26519-91-5
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, methyl-
I.C-1
33320-27-3
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene-1-carboxaldehyde
III-12
4784-86-5
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1,2-dimethyl-
I.C-1
4045-53-8
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1,3-dimethyl-
I.C-1
96-39-9
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 1-methyl-
I.C-1
96-38-8
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 5-methyl-
I.C-1
497-20-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentadiene, 5-methylene-
1
0
0
2,4-Cyclopentadien-1-one, 2,3-dimethyl-4-hydroxy-
Selected structures
{fulvene}
Chapter Table
I.C-1 II.A-5, III-13
94618-71-0
1
0
0
2,4-Cyclopentadien-1-one, 2-methyl-
III-13
193-54-4
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[cd]fluoranthene
I.E-6
0
1
0
Cyclopenta[b]furan, 3-acetyl-4-pentyl-
C5H11
III-13, X-2
COCH3
O
1
1
1
Cyclopenta[b]furan-6-one, 4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-
CH3
III-13, X-2
O O
1162-65-8
0
1
0
Cyclopenta[c]furo[3',2':4,5]furo[2,3-h][1]benzopyran1,11-dione, 2,3,6a,9a-tetrahydro-4-methoxy-, (6aR-cis){aflatoxin B1}
O
O
III-13, VI-3, X-2
O O O
7220-81-7
0
1
0
Cyclopenta[c]furo[3',2':4,5]furo[2,3-h][1]benzopyran1,11-dione, 2,3,6a,8,9,9a-hexahydro-4-methoxy-, (6aR-cis){aflatoxin B2}
287-92-3
1
0
0
Cyclopentane
2452-99-5
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-, cis-
{pentamethylene}
OCH3
III-13, VI-3, X-2
I.C-1 I.C-1
822-50-4
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-, trans-
I.C-1
96-37-7
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, methyl-
I.C-1
53366-54-4
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, (2-methylbutylidene)-
I.C-1
53366-58-8
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, (2-methylpropylidene)-
I.C-1
79637-61-9
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, propenyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, propyl-
I.C-1
30498-64-7
1
0
0
Cyclopentane, trimethyl-
I.C-1
20497-93-2
0
1
0
Cyclopentanecarboxaldehyde, 2-hydroxy-1-methyl{2 isomers}
III-12
3400-45-1
0
1
0
Cyclopentanecarboxylic acid {cyclopentanoic acid}
IV.A-3
38655-27-5
0
1
0
Cyclopentanecarboxylic acid, 1-methyl-3-(1methylethenyl)-
IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1563
11/24/08 1:56:01 PM
1564
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
66016-71-5
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedicarboxylic acid, 1-methyl-3-(1methylethyl)-
28473-29-2
1
0
0
Cyclopentanedione
3008-40-0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
{2 isomers}
Selected structures
Chapter Table IV.A-3 III-13
1
1
1
1,2-Cyclopentanedione
III-13
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 4-acetyl-
III-13
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,4-diethyl-
III-13
54362-49-1
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,5-diethyl-
III-13
72692-92-3
1
1
1
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,3-dimethyl-
III-13
13494-06-9
1
1
1
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,4-dimethyl-
III-13
13494-07-0
1
1
1
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3,5-dimethyl-
III-13
13494-08-1
71608-11-2
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-ethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-ethyl-3-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-ethyl-5-methyl- = 1,2Cyclopentanedione, 5-ethyl-3-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
765-70-8
1
1
1
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-methyl-
60386-55-2
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
{cyclotene}
III-13
72693-09-5
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
71608-12-3
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-methyl-5-propyl-
III-13
69745-71-7
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-phenyl-
III-13
III-13
4542-64-7
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 4-phenyl-
III-13
23747-37-7
1
0
0
1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-propyl-
III-13
3859-41-4
0
1
0
1,3-Cyclopentanedione
III-13
34598-80-6
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentanedione, 2,4-dimethyl-
III-13
823-36-9
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentanedione, 2-ethyl-
III-13
765-69-5
1
0
0
1,3-Cyclopentanedione, 2-methyl-
III-13
120-92-3
1
1
1
Cyclopentanone
55713-44-5
0
1
0
Cyclopentanone, 2,2-dimethyl-4-(2-oxopropyl)-
{adipic ketone}
III-13 III-13
4041-09-2
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 2,5-dimethyl-
III-13
4971-18-0
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 2-ethyl-
III-13
10264-55-8
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 3-ethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 2-ethylidene-
III-13
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 2-hydroxy-
III-13
28631-88-1
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, methyl-
III-13
1120-72-5
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 2-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 2-(1-methylpropyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
Cyclopentanone, 3-methyl-
III-13
1757-42-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1564
11/24/08 1:56:01 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1565
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
189-01-5
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1 219-07-8
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
Cyclopenta[cd]perylene
I.E-6
0
Cyclopenta[cd]perylene, methyl-
I.E-6
0
Cyclopenta[a]phenalene
I.E-6
0
Cyclopentaphenanthrene {at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
0
0
Cyclopentaphenanthrene, methyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
1
0
0
15H-Cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene
I.E-6
482-66-6
1
0
0
15H-Cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene, 16,17-dihydro-
I.E-6
219-08-9
1
0
0
17H -Cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene
I.E-6
71277-92-4
1
0
0
17H -Cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene, ethyl-
I.E-6
71277-93-5
1
0
0
17H -Cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene, methyl-
I.E-6
203-64-5
1
0
0
4H -Cyclopenta[def]phenanthrene {4,5-methylenephenanthrene}
I.E-6
71277-91-3
1
0
0
4H-Cyclopenta[def]phenanthrene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
65319-51-9
1
0
0
4H-Cyclopenta[def]phenanthrene, ethyl-
I.E-6
58548-39-3
1
0
0
4H-Cyclopenta[def]phenanthrene, methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[l]phenanthrene, dihydro-
I.E-6
1
0
0
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine
211-95-0
25042-83-5
5
XVII.E-6
4
N
3
6 2 7
38917-63-4
1
0
0
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine, 6,7-dihydro-2,3-dimethyl-
N 1
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine, 6,7-dihydro-5,7-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
38917-60-1
1
0
0
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine, 6,7-dihydro-2-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
23747-46-8
1
1
1
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine, 6,7-dihydro-2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
23747-48-0
1
1
1
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine, 6,7-dihydro-5-methyl-
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1565
11/24/08 1:56:02 PM
1566
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
61891-57-4
1
0
0
5H-Cyclopentapyrazine, dimethyl-
42315-22-0
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[a]pyrene
XVII.E-6 I.E-6
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[a]pyrene, 3,4-dihydro{sometimes listed as 3,4-Trimethylenepyrene}
I.E-6
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[a]pyrene, 3,4-dihydromethyl-
I.E-6
27208-37-3
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[cd]pyrene
I.E-6
25732-74-5
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, 3,4-dihydro-
I.E-6
64760-18-5
1
0
0
Cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, 3,4-dihydromethyl-
I.E-6
23992-32-7
1
0
0
4H-Cyclopenta[def]triphenylene {4,5-methylenetriphenylene}
I.E-6
142-29-0
1
0
0
Cyclopentene
0
1
0
Cyclopentene, 2-acetyl-4-hydroxy-4-(1-methylethyl)-
0
1
0
Cyclopentene, 2,3-diacetyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-
I.C-1
II.A-5, III-13 H3C
III-13
CH3 1
CO-CH3
2 3
4
CO-CH3
0
1
0
Cyclopentene, 2,3-diacetyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C 4
1
III-13
CH3
3
CO-CH3
2
CO-CH3
1 28638-58-6 2146-38-5
0
0
Cyclopentene, ethenyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, 1-ethenyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, ethyl-
I.C-1
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, 1-ethyl-
I.C-1
693-89-0
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, 1-methyl-
I.C-1
1120-62-3
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, 3-methyl-
I.C-1
1759-81-5
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, 4-methyl-
I.C-1
3074-61-1
1
0
0
Cyclopentene, 1-propyl-
56169-12-1
0
1
0
1-Cyclopentene-1-carboxylic acid, 2-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-
I.C-1 COOH
CH3
IV.A-3
H3C CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1566
11/24/08 1:56:02 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1567
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 28750-51-8 2687-69-6
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
3-Cyclopentene-1,2-dione
III-13
1
0
0
3-Cyclopentene-1,2-dione, 3,4-dimethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
3-Cyclopentene-1,2-dione, 3,5-dimethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
3-Cyclopentene-1,2-dione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
III-13
10130-95-7
1
0
0
3-Cyclopentene-1,2-dione, 3-methyl-
III-13
66309-79-3
1
0
0
3-Cyclopentene-1,2-dione, 4-methyl-
III-13
930-60-9
0
1
0
4-Cyclopentene-1,3-dione
III-13
18515-43-0
1
0
0
4-Cyclopentene-1,3-dione, 4,5-dimethyl-
III-13
53109-18-5
0
1
0
1-Cyclopentene-1-pentanoic acid, G-hydroxy-3,5bis(1-methylpropyl)-E-oxo-
III-13
28982-58-3
1
0
0
Cyclopentenone
III-13
930-30-3
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one
24105-07-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, C3-alkyl-
{cyclopenten-3-one}
III-13 III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, C4-alkyl-
III-13
72692-71-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, dimethyl-
III-13
61205-39-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, ethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
21835-01-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, ethyl-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, phenyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, trimethyl-
17190-74-8
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-(2-butenyl)-4-hydroxy-3methyl-
78210-65-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-(2-furanyl)-
61892-84-0
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-(2-oxopropyl)-
80-72-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3-dihydroxy{reductic acid}
III-13 II.A-5, III-13 III-13, X-2 III-13 II.A-5, III-13 O
HO OH
1121-05-7
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3-dimethyl-
III-13
3779-64-4
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3-dimethyl-4-(1methylethyl)-
III-13
61893-14-9
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3-dimethyl-5-(1methylethyl)-
III-13
28790-86-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3,4-trimethyl-
III-13
5456-24-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,3,5-trimethyl-
III-13
66309-82-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,4,5-trimethyl-
III-13
23048-13-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,4-dimethyl-
III-13
4041-11-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2,5-dimethyl-
III-13
2931-10-4
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-ethyl-
III-13
5682-72-4
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-ethyl-3-methyl-
III-13
78210-64-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(1-butyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1567
11/24/08 1:56:02 PM
1568
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
80-71-7
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl{methylcyclopentenolone}
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(2-methylbutyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(3-methylbutyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-4-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(1-methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(2-methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-4-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-5-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-3-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-pentyl-
II.A-5, III-13
25684-04-2
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13
82147-26-0
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-4-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13
61205-40-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxypropyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3,4,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methoxy-
III-13, X-2
14189-85-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methoxy-3-methyl-
III-13, X-2
1120-73-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methyl-
5760-58-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methyl-3-propyl-
III-13
61892-83-9
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
III-13
31089-17-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
66309-80-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-methyl-5-methylene-
III-13
24105-07-5 1619-28-9
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 2-propyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-(2-furanyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,4-diethyl-2-hydroxy-
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,4-dimethyl-
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,4-dimethyl-2-hydroxy-
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,4-dimethyl-2-(1methylethyl)-
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,5-diethyl-2-hydroxy-
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,5-dimethyl-
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,5-dimethyl-2-4-ethylhydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,5-dimethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,5-dimethyl-2-(1methylethyl)-
III-13
5682-69-9
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-
III-13
21835-01-8
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy{ethylcyclopentenolone}
30434-64-1 72692-76-3
931-22-6
III-13 II.A-5, III-13 III-13 II.A-5, III-13 III-13 II.A-5, III-13 III-13
II.A-5, III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1568
11/24/08 1:56:03 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1569
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
41496-77-9 78210-63-6
5870-63-3
S
T
S T
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy-5-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-methoxy-
III-13
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-methyl-
III-13
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-4-hydroxy-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-5-methyl-
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
2758-18-1
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-methyl-
III-13
3727-35-3
1
1
1
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-methyl-2-(2-oxopropyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-methyl-2-(1,3-pentadienyl)-
III-13
488-10-8
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-methyl-2-(2-pentenyl)-, (Z)-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-(2-oxopropyl)-
III-13
3810-26-2
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-phenyl-
III-13
35953-18-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-propyl-
III-13
30434-65-2
0
1
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3,4,4-trimethyl-
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-ethyl-2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-ethyl-2-hydroxy-3-methyl-
71278-13-2
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-ethyl-2-methyl-
10288-24-1
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-
23415-96-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-methyl-
III-13
66309-81-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-methyl-3-(1-propenyl)-
III-13
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 5-ethyl-2-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13
70919-26-5
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 5-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
70919-27-6
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 5-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13
14963-40-7
1
0
0
2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 5-methyl-
14320-37-7
III-13
1
0
0
3-Cyclopenten-1-one
III-13
0
1
0
3-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
1630-94-0
1
0
0
Cyclopropane, 1,1-dimethyl-
I.C-1
2511-95-7
1
0
0
Cyclopropane, 1,2-dimethyl-
I.C-1
930-18-7
1
0
0
Cyclopropane, 1,2-dimethyl-, (Z)-
I.C-1
2402-06-4
1
0
0
Cyclopropane, 1,2-dimethyl-, (E)-
22059-21-8
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 1-amino-
91465-08-6
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2-chloro-3,3,3trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-dimethyl-, cyano(3phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Ȝ-Cyhalothrin®}
52315-07-8
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2,2dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethyl-, cyano(3phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Cypermethrin®}
I.C-1 IV.A-3, XII-2 V-3, XI-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
H3C
CH3
O
O
Cl O
CN
V-3, X-2, XI-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1569
11/24/08 1:56:03 PM
1570
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
67375-30-8
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2,2dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethyl-, cyano(3phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Į-Cypermethrin®}
121-29-9
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(3methoxy-2-methyl-3-oxo-1-propenyl)-, 2-methyl-4oxo-3-(2,4-pentadienyl)-2-cyclopenten-1-yl ester {Pyrethrin II®}
7696-12-0
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methyl-1-propenyl)-, (1-cyclohexene-1,2dicarboximido)methyl ester {Tetramethrin®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
V-3, X-2, XI-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
V-3, XXI-3
O CH3
CH3
H3C
N
O
H3C
O O
V-3, X-2, XXI-3 121-21-1
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methyl-1-propenyl)-, 2-methyl-4-oxo-3-(2,4pentadienyl)-2-cyclopenten-1-yl ester {Pyrethrin I®}
10453-86-8
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methylpropenyl)-, (5-phenylmethyl-3furanyl)methyl ester {Resmethrin®}
52918-63-5
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2,2dibromoethenyl)-, cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Deltamethrin®}
V-3, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
XXI-3
Br
H3C
CH3
O
O
Br
CN
O
V-3, X-2, XI-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 52645-53-1
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3dichloroethenyl-, (3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Permethrin®; Spartan®}
Cl
H3C
CH3
O
O
Cl O
V-3, X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 68359-37-5
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2,2dichloroethenyl)-, cyano(4-fluoro-3phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Cyfluthrin®}
F Cl
H3C
CH3
O
O
Cl
CN
O
V-3, X-2, XI-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 97-41-6
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methylpropenyl)-, ethyl ester
V-3
5460-63-9
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methylpropenyl)-, methyl ester
V-3
25402-06-6
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methyl-1-propenyl)-, 3-(2-butenyl)-2-methyl-4-oxo2-cyclopenten-1-yl ester {Cinerin I®}
XXI-3
4466-14-2
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methyl-1-propenyl)-, 2-methyl-4-oxo-3-(2pentenyl)-2-cyclopenten-1-yl ester {Jasmolin 1®}
XXI-3
584-79-2
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methylpropenyl)-, 2-(1-propenyl)-4-hydroxy-3methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one ester {Allethrin®}
O
O
O
V-3, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1570
11/24/08 1:56:03 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1571
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
66841-25-6
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-3(1,2,2,2-tetrabromoethyl)-, cyano(3phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Tralomethrin®}
39515-41-8
1
1
1
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,2,3,3-tetramethyl cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Fenpropathrin®, Danitol®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XI-2, XXI-3
XI-2, XXI-3 82657-04-3
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-[(1Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3trifluoro-1-propenyl]-2,2-dimethyl-, (2-methyl[1,1'biphenyl]-3-yl)methyl ester, (1R,3R)-rel{Bifenthrin®, Biphenthrin®}
17219-23-7
0
1
0
Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-
32809-16-8
0
1
0
1,2-Cyclopropanedicarboximide, N (3,5dichlorophenyl)-1,2-dimethyl{Procymidone®}
XXI-3
IV.A-3 O
N
Cl
O
18383-59-0
0
1
0
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
Cyclopropanemethanol, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(2methylpropenyl){chrysanthemyl alcohol}
50906-50-8
0
1
0
9,19-Cyclostigmast-24(28)-en-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D,24Z)-
89288-59-5
0
1
0
4,13-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,3-diol, 8-hydroperoxy1,5-dimethyl-9-methylene-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,8R*,12R*,13E)]-
II.A-5 OH
II.B-2 H3C H2C
OH
9
11
8
6
HOO
12
7
1
13 4
5
0
1
0
4,13-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,3-diol, 8-hydroperoxy1,5-dimethyl-9-methylene-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,8S*,12S*,13E)]-
H3 C
OH
9
11 6
0
1
0
5,10-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,2,7,9-tetrol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,2R*,5E,7S*,9R*,10E,12R*)]-
7
4
H3C
OH 12
9 6
7
0
1
0
4,13-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,3,8-triol, 1,5-dimethyl-9methylene-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,8S*,12S*,13E)]-
1 4
5
OH
89362-09-4
II.A-5
CH3
10
8
CH3
2
3
OH
H3C OH
1
13 5
CH3
102734-57-6
II.A-5
CH3
12
8
HOO
CH3
OH
10
H2C
2
3
CH3
89362-05-0
II.A-5
CH3
10
2
CH3 OH
3
CH3
II.A-5 9
11
8
6
HO
14
12
10
7
1
13 4
5
OH 2
3
OH
91200-13-4
0
1
0
II.A-5
4,13-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,3,8-triol, 1,5-dimethyl-9methylene-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,8S*,12R*,13E)]HO
9
11
8
6 7
14
12
10
1
13 5
4
3
OH 2
OH
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1571
11/24/08 1:56:04 PM
1572
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
80802-00-2
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table II.A-5
4,13-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,3,8-triol, 1,5-dimethyl-9methylene-12-(1-methylethyl)-
14
12
10 9
11
8
13
6
HO
1
4
5
7
OH 2
3
OH
91163-46-1
0
1
0
5,9-Cyclotetradecadiene-1,4,8-triol, 4,8-dimethyl-14methylene-11-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,4R*,5E,8S*,9E,11R*)]-
H3C H2C
OH
9
13 14
12
1
3
HO
II.A-5
CH3
11
8
10 5
4
2
OH
H3C
CH3
7 6
90660-18-7
0
1
0
4,9-Cyclotetradecadien-1-one, 6,8-dihydroxy-4,8dimethyl-14-methylene-11-(1-methylethyl)-, [6R(4E,6R*,
II.A-5, III-13
119613-98-8
0
1
0
5,10-Cyclotetradecadien-1-one, 7,9-dihydroxy-7,11dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, [4S(4R*,5E,7R*,9S*,10E)]-
II.A-5, III-13
1786-12-5
0
1
0
Cyclotetradecane, 1,7,11-trimethyl-4-(1methylethyl)-
H3C
I.C-1
CH3
6
H3C
2
7
4
5 10
8
1
3
CH3
11
9
CH3
150405-76-8
0
1
0
1,3,6,10-Cyclotetradecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-
I.C-1
101159-08-4
1
1
1
1,3,6,10-Cyclotetradecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl14-(1-methylethyl){cembrene}
I.C-1
1898-13-1
0
1
0
1,3,6,10-Cyclotetradecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl14-(1-methylethyl)-, [S- (E,Z,E,E)]-
I.C-1
0
1
0
1,3,6,11-Cyclotetradecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl14-(1-methylethyl)-
I.C-1 11
14
3
1 6
7
0
1
0
I.C-1
5,8,11,14-Cyclotetradecatetraene, 1.5.9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-
14
9 11 8
101159-07-3
0
1
0
1,4,7,10-Cyclotetradecatetraene, 1,7,11-trimethyl-4(1-methylethenyl)-
39815-66-2
0
1
0
2,4,9,13-Cyclotetradecatetraen-1-ol, 3,9,13trimethyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-
1
12 5
I.C-1 H3C H3C
9
8 7 12
10
II.A-5
CH3
6
4 5
13
1
CH3
OH
CH3
3 2
11
57688-99-0 59284-87-6
1
0
0
2,6,11-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,5-diol, 1,5,11trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1572
11/24/08 1:56:05 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1573
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
84367-90-8
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
II.A-5
2,6,11-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,5-diol, 1,5,11trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,2E,5R*,6E,8R*,11E)]-
10
8
11
5
1
0
2,6,11-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,5-diol, 1,5,11trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2E,5S*,6E,8S*,11E)]-
89288-60-8
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 9hydroperoxy-1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1R*,3S*,4E,7E,9R*,12R*,13E)]-
4 3
OH
II.A-5
H3C H3C
OH 12
11
9
HOO
II.A-5
CH3
10
6
8
1
13 4
5
CH3
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 9hydroperoxy-1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1R*,3S*,4E,7E,9S*,12R*,13E)]-
OH
H3C H3C
OH 12
11 6
8
1
13 4
5
7
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 9hydroperoxy-1,5,9-trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R-(1R*,3R*,4E,7E,9S*,12S*,13E)]-
OH
H3C 10
12
11
9
6
8
1
13 4
5
7
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,9-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,7E,9R*,12R*,13E)]-
H3C
CH3
OH
II.A-5
CH3
CH3
CH3
10
12
11
9
HO
2
3
CH3
82003-46-1
II.A-5
CH3 OH
H3C HOO
CH3 2
3
CH3
89362-07-2
II.A-5
CH3
10 9
HOO
CH3 2
3
7
89362-06-1
OH
2 1
13
0
6
7
9 14
123
84367-92-0
Chapter Table
8
1
13
6
4
5
OH
2
3
7
OH
CH3
89362-10-7
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,9-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,7E,9R*,12R*,13E)]-
H3 C
II.A-5
CH3
CH3
CH3
10
12
11
9
HO
1
13
6
8
4
5
OH
2
3
7
OH
CH3
89362-11-8
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,9-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,7E,9R*,12R*,13E)]-
H3C
II.A-5
CH3
CH3
CH3
10 11
9
HO
6
8
12
1
13 4
5
OH
2
3
7
OH
CH3
91200-14-5
0
1
0
4,7,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,9-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,7E,9R*,12R*,13E)]-
H3C
II.A-5
CH3
CH3
CH3
10 11
9
HO
6
8
12
1
13 5
4
3
2
OH
7
CH3
116348-80-2
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3S*,4E,8E,12S*,13E)]-
OH
II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1573
11/24/08 1:56:05 PM
1574
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
121916-90-3
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3R*,4E,8E,12S*,13E)]-
II.A-5
122620-36-4
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, (1R*,3R*,4E,8E,12S*,13E)(r)-
II.A-5
57605-80-8
1
1
1
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,8E,12S*,13E)]-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
H3C
II.A-5
CH3 OH
10
H3C 9
11 6
8
Chapter Table
12 5
1
13 4
2
3
CH3
7
CH3
57605-81-9
1
1
1
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R1R*,3R*,4E,8E,12S*,13E)]-
H3C
OH
II.A-5
CH3 OH
10
H3C 9
11 6
8
12 5
1
13 4
3
2
CH3
7
CH3
OH
87554-04-9
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,8E,12S*,13Z)]-
II.A-5
7220-78-2
1
1
1
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5
2043-08-1
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 1,5,9-trimethyl12-(1-methylethyl)-, 3-acetate, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,8E,12S*,13E)]-
II.A-5
146564-67-2
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3-diol, 9(hydroxymethyl)-1,5-dimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1R*,3S*,4E,8Z,12R*,13E)]-
II.A-5
1
1
1
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1-ol-3-one,-1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-,
II.A-5
149403-67-8
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,7-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,7S*,8E,12R*)]-
II.A-5
149403-68-9
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,7-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,3S*,4E,7R*,8E,12R*)]-
II.A-5
149403-69-0
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,7-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,7R*,8E,12S*)]-
II.A-5
149403-70-3
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,7-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,7S*,8E,12S*)]-
II.A-5
149403-71-4
0
1
0
4,8,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,7-triol, 1,5,9trimethyl-12-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,7S*,8Z,12S*)]-
II.A-5
146564-66-1
0
1
0
4,9,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,8-triol, 3,9,13trimethyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3R*,4E,6S*,8R*,9E,13E)]-
II.A-5
146609-95-2
0
1
0
4,9,13-Cyclotetradecatriene-1,3,8-triol, 3,9,13trimethyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,3S*,4E,6S*,8R*,9E,13E)]-
II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1574
11/24/08 1:56:06 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1575
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
60026-11-1
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
2,7,12-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol, 1,7-dimethyl-11methylene-4-(1-methylethyl)Chem. Abstracts numbering
II.A-5 H3C
CH3 CH3
H3C 7 8
6
4
5
12
10
9
3
11
2 13
1 14
OH
CH2
Chem. Abstracts numbering 87387-80-2
0
1
0
2,6,12-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol, 3,7,13-trimethyl-10(1-methylethenyl)-
II.A-5
119864-28-7
0
1
0
2,7,10-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol, 1,7,11-trimethyl-4(1-methylethyl)-, [1R- (1R*,2E,4S*,7E,10E)]-
II.A-5
119944-62-6
0
1
0
2,7,10-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol, 1,7,11-trimethyl-4(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1R*,2E,4R*,7E,10E)]-
II.A-5
25269-17-4
1
1
1
2,7,11-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol, 1,7,11-trimethyl-4(1-methylethyl)-, [1R-(1R*,2E,4S*,7E,11E)]-
H3C H3C
II.A-5
CH3 CH3
2
6 7
5
8
10 9
4
1
3
OH
12
11
13
CH3
80126-41-6
0
1
0
2,7,11-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-ol, 1,7,11-trimethyl-4(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1R*,2E,4R*,7E,11E)]-
H3C H3C
II.A-5
CH3 CH3
2
6 7
5
8
10 9
4 11
1
3
OH
12 13
CH3
149312-90-3
0
1
0
2,6,11-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-one, 5,13-dihydroxy3,7,13-trimethyl-10-(1-methylethyl)-, [5S(2E,5R*,6E,10R*,11E,13R*)]-
II.A-5, III-13
98064-74-5
0
1
0
2,5,11-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-one, 7,13-dihydroxy3,7,13-trimethyl-10-(1- methylethyl)-, [7S(2E,5E,7R*,10R*,11E,13R*)]-
II.A-5, III-13
149312-89-0
0
1
0
2,7,12-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-one, 9,11-dihydroxy3,9,13-trimethyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-, [6S(2E,6R*,7E,9R*,11S*,12E)]-
II.A-5, III-13
149403-72-5
0
1
0
2,7,12-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-one, 9,11-dihydroxy3,9,13-trimethyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-, [6S(2E,6R*,7E,9S*,11S*,12E)]-
II.A-5, III-13
41429-54-3
0
1
0
2,6,11-Cyclotetradecatrien-1-one, 13-hydroxy3,7,13-trimethyl-10-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5 12
11
13
HO
2
1
14
10
3
8
7
9 4
6
5
O
0
1
0
13-Cyclotetradecene-1,3,4,8-tetrol-1-methyl-5,9dimethylene-12-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C
OH
10
H2C
HO
II.A-5
CH3
9
11
8
6 7
12 5
1
13 4
CH2
OH
3
CH3 2
OH
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1575
11/24/08 1:56:06 PM
1576
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 1-Cyclotetradecen-1-one, 3,6,13-triol-3,13-dimethyl7-methylene-10-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C H2C 7
HO
1
0
0
Cycloundecane, 1,1,2-trimethyl-
6753-98-6
0
1
0
1,4,8-Cycloundecatriene, 2,6,6,9-tetramethyl-, (E,E,E)-
II.A-5, III-13
CH3 12
8
6
62376-15-2
Chapter Table
Selected structures
9 4
5
10
H3C
13
11 2
3
CH3 OH
1
OH O
I.C-1 I.C-1
6
7 8
5
4
9 1
10
2
3
11
498-40-8
0
1
0
Cysteic acid
HO-SO2-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.B-7, XVIII.A-1
52-90-4
1
1
1
L-Cysteine {propanoic acid, 2-amino-3-mercapto- (R)}
HS-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH
636-58-8
0
1
0
L-Cysteine, N-L-J-glutamyl-
24645-67-8
0
1
0
Cystine
65-46-3
0
1
0
Cytidine
IV.B-7, XVIII.A-1 IV.B-7, XVIII.A-1
{propanoic acid, 2-amino-3,3’-dithiobis-}
{S-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH}2 IV.B-7, XVIII.A-1 II.A-5, X-2, XII-2, XVII.B-2
{2(1H)-pyrimidinone, 4-amino-1-ED-ribofuranosyl-} 65-47-4
0
1
0
Cytidine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate)
63-37-6
0
1
0
5'-Cytidylic acid
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, X-2, XII-2, XVII.B-2
NH2 OH O
P OH
N O O
N
O
OH OH
9044-61-5
0
1
0
Cytochrome b 559
XXII-2
9035-46-5
0
1
0
Cytochrome c6
XXII-2
0
1
0
Cytochrome oxidase
XXII-2
62168-75-6
0
1
0
Deacylase
XXII-2
2363-88-4
0
1
0
2,4-Decadienal
III-12
25152-84-5
1
1
1
2,4-Decadienal, (E,E)-
III-12
63889-75-8
0
1
0
Decadienoic acid
59286-28-1
0
1
0
2,4-Decadienoic acid, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-9oxo-, (Z,E)-
III-13, IV.A-3
58315-84-7
0
1
0
2,4-Decadienoic acid, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-9oxo-, [S-(E,E)]-
III-13, IV.A-3
59262-52-1
0
1
0
2,7-Decadienoic acid, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)-9oxo-, (E,E)-
III-13, IV.A-3
158815-70-4
0
1
0
4,9-Decadienoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)-9-(tetrahydro-5-oxo-2-furanyl)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
160115-53-7
0
1
0
4,9-Decadienoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)-9-(tetrahydro-5-oxo-2-furanyl)-, methyl ester
II.A-5, V-3
112-31-2
1
1
1
Decanal
{sebacic acid}
{capraldehyde}
IV.A-3
H3C-(CH2)8-CH=O
III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1576
11/24/08 1:56:06 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1577
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
124-18-5
1
1
1
Decane
H3C-(CH2)8-CH3
I.A-10
61193-21-3
1
0
0
Decane, methyl-
C10H21-CH3
I.A-10
6975-98-0
0
1
0
Decane, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)7-CH3
I.A-10
13151-34-3
1
0
0
Decane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)6-CH3
I.A-10
13151-35-4
1
0
0
Decane, 5-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)4-CH(CH3)-(CH2)3-CH3
I.A-10
111-20-6
1
1
1
Decanedioic acid
HOOC-(CH2)8-COOH
IV.A-3
110-40-7
0
1
0
Decanedioic acid, diethyl ester
334-48-5
1
1
1
Decanoic acid
H5C2-OOC-(CH2)8-COO-C2H5 {capric acid} {ethyl caprate}
H3C-(CH2)8-COOH
V-3
IV.A-3, XXI-3
110-38-3
1
1
1
Decanoic acid, ethyl ester
5601-60-5
0
1
0
Decanoic acid, 8-methyl-
H 3C-(CH2)8-COO-C2H5
V-3
110-42-9
0
1
0
Decanoic acid, methyl ester
70898-23-6
1
1
1
Decanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester, (all-E)-
V-3
70898-24-7
0
1
0
Decanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
V-3
IV.A-3 H3C-(CH2)8-COO-CH3
{capric alcohol}
V-3
112-30-1
1
1
1
1-Decanol
693-54-9
1
1
1
2-Decanone
9027-22-9
0
1
0
Decarboxylase
XXII-2
9036-20-8
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, adenosylmethionine
XXII-2
9024-77-5
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, arginine
XXII-2
9024-58-2
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, glutamate
XXII-2
37259-67-9
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, glycine
XXII-2
9024-60-6
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, ornithine
XXII-2
9001-04-1
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, pyruvate
XXII-2
{methyl octyl ketone}
H3C-(CH2)8-CH2OH
II.A-5, XXI-3
H3C-(CH2)7-CO-CH3
III-13
9024-70-8
0
1
0
Decarboxylase, uroporphyrinogen
XXII-2
63892-04-6
0
1
0
2,7,9-Decatrienoic acid, 3,9-dimethyl-6-(1methylethyl)-, (E,E)-
IV.A-3
2497-25-8
0
1
0
2-Decenal, (Z)-
3913-71-1
0
1
0
2-Decenal, (E)-
872-05-9
1
1
1
1-Decene
H2C=CH-(CH2)7-CH3
1
0
0
1-Decene, 5-methyl-
H2C=CH-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)4-CH3 I.B-1
0
1
0
2-Decene
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)6-CH3
6816-17-7
H3C-(CH2)6-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12 III-12
{3 isomers detected}
I.B-1 I.B-1
26446-27-5
0
1
0
Decenoic acid
60924-66-5
0
1
0
4-Decenoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)-9-oxo-
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3
IV.A-3
129777-23-7
0
1
0
4-Decenoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)-9-oxo-, [R-[R*,S*-(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3
77288-98-3
0
1
0
6-Decen-2-one, 8,10-dihydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3
9001-03-0
0
1
0
Dehydratase, carbonate
XXII-2
9024-34-4
0
1
0
Dehydratase, threonine
XXII-2
9035-82-9
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase
XXII-2
9001-40-5
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, glucose 6-phosphate
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1577
11/24/08 1:56:07 PM
1578
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9001-46-1
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, glutamate
XXII-2
9029-12-3
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, glutamate (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate))
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, glutamic acid
XXII-2
9026-38-4
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, glutathione (ascorbate)
XXII-2
9001-50-7
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, glyceraldehyde phosphate
XXII-2
9028-13-1
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, homoserine
XXII-2
9001-58-5
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, isocitrate
XXII-2
9028-48-2
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, isocitrate (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate)
XXII-2
9001-64-3
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, malate
XXII-2
56941-16-3
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, malate (decarboxylating) (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate))
XXII-2
37250-19-4
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, malate (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate)
XXII-2
9028-47-1
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, malate (oxalacetatedecarboxylating) (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate)
XXII-2
9029-14-5
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, methylenetetrahydrofolate
XXII-2
37256-31-8
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, nicotine
XXII-2
9001-82-5
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, phosphogluconate
XXII-2
9073-95-4
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, phosphogluconate (decarboxylating)
XXII-2
9050-70-8
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, proline
XXII-2
9028-28-8
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, quinate
XXII-2
9079-67-8
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
XXII-2
9032-20-6
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) (quinone)
XXII-2
37256-36-3
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (quinone)
XXII-2
37256-37-4
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (quinone)
XXII-2
9001-68-7
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
XXII-2
9026-87-3
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, shikimate
XXII-2
9002-02-2
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, succinate
XXII-2
9054-84-6
0
1
0
Dehydrogenase, xanthine
XXII-2
159844-35-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Arabidopsis thaliana clone TAY029 gene UbcAt3 ubiquitin-carrier enzyme E 2 messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
141712-74-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Arabidopsis thaliana strain Heynhold glycerol phosphate acyltransferase messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
140812-74-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia gene pma1 plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1578
11/24/08 1:56:07 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1579
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
130061-32-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana sylvestris clone NySS4 ribulose diphosphate carboxylase small subunit gene)
XXII-2
144997-82-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana sylvestris clone yaDC12/yaDC17 gene psaDa protein D 2 messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
155317-25-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A11 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155317-10-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A13 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155317-11-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A14 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155317-12-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A15 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155317-13-8
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A6 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155317-14-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A7 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155317-15-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A9 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
160074-66-8
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum clone Ubi.U4 gene Ubi.U4 polyubiquitin plus 5' and 3' flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
160075-53-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum cv. SR1 leaf clone Ntfad3 Z-3 fatty acid desaturase mRNAcomplementary plus 5' and 3' flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
131553-16-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum samsun 16.5-kilodalton protein messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
131553-15-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum samsun chitinase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
143514-65-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone NeIF-5A3 protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A isoform gene)
XXII-2
141093-81-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pMOG404 osmotin messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1579
11/24/08 1:56:08 PM
1580
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
143638-33-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pTOL1 osmotin messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
143341-52-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco 1-109-extensin-like protein precursor-specifying)
XXII-2
152619-15-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco chitinase acidic isoenzyme III messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
152619-16-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco chitinase basic isoenzyme III messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
142978-98-1
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco chloroplast clone L27-1 ribosome protein L 27 messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
139872-58-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone .lambda.5A gene RB7 plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
139872-57-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone .lambda.5A gene RB7)
XXII-2
128284-58-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone .lambda.CHN17 chitinase basic isoenzyme gene)
XXII-2
156553-68-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone 59 gene chi-V chitinase plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
156553-69-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone cA-3 gene chi-V chitinase messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
155663-09-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone cpb20-52 antifungal protein CPB 20 messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
124757-79-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone E22 protein PR 5 gene)
XXII-2
148757-18-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone G27.1/G27.2 gene Npg1 plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
158928-85-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone lambda TFLO 4 gene NFL2 exon 1 fragment)
XXII-2
158928-86-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone lambda TFLO 4 gene NFL2 exon 2 fragment)
XXII-2
158928-87-1
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone lambda TFLO 4 gene NFL2 exon 3 fragment)
XXII-2
145137-42-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone NtDAHPS-1 phospho-2-keto-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
151876-45-8
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone OMT3.4 catechol methyltransferase isoenzyme II messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-15-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.1 endo-1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme gene coding region)
XXII-2
128512-16-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.3 endo-1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme gene coding region)
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1580
11/24/08 1:56:08 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1581
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
147626-92-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pcGS2-17 glutamine synthetase isoenzyme 2 messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
128512-19-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pGL31 endo1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
128512-20-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pGL36 endo1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
128512-21-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pGL43 endo1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
103469-25-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone PROB12 protein TL messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
158928-82-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pTGF220 gene NFL1 exon 1 fragment)
XXII-2
158928-83-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pTGF220 gene NFL1 exon 2 fragment)
XXII-2
158928-84-8
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pTGF220 gene NFL1 exon 3 fragment)
XXII-2
141002-75-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone pVK5 osmotin messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
150001-42-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco clone TSC81 ribosome protein L 17 messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-25-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco endo-1,3-Eglucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary)
XXII-2
143341-55-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco extensin-like protein 107-amino acid fragment-specifying)
XXII-2
143341-56-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco extensin-like protein 81-amino acid fragment-specifying)
XXII-2
160936-44-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco leaf curl virus coat protein gene)
XXII-2
141004-11-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco ribosome protein L 2 messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143513-68-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco strain NK326 gene oee2-A plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143513-69-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco strain NK326 gene oee2-A)
XXII-2
149309-58-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco thioredoxin h2 gene plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
140114-22-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid (tobacco thioredoxin messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
141712-75-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Arabidopsis thaliana strain Heynhold glycerol phosphate acyltransferase messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1581
11/24/08 1:56:08 PM
1582
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
148037-15-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Arabidopsis thaliana thioredoxin h messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
147533-09-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana alata clone NaPRP3g12 proline-rich protein PRP 3 gene plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
139860-37-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-4A2 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
146150-24-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-4A2 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
140095-89-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-4A3 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
146150-26-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-4A3 protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
140360-04-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-5A2 protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A isoform messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143514-64-1
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-5A2 protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A isoform messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
141374-52-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone pSOD3 copper-zinc superoxide dismutase messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143348-77-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone pSOD3 copper-zinc superoxide dismutase messenger RNA-complementary)
XXII-2
144997-81-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana sylvestris clone yaDC12/yaDC17 gene psaDa protein D 2 messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
140110-39-0
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone NeIF-5A3 protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A isoform gene plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
141093-82-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pMOG404 osmotin messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
141093-84-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pMOG4041-226-osmotin-specifying plus 5'and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
142978-99-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco chloroplast clone L27-1 ribosome protein L 27 messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1582
11/24/08 1:56:09 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1583
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
145093-14-7
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone EPSPS-1 5enolpyruvoylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
139837-73-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone NtDAHPS-1 phospho-2-keto-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-17-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.1 endo-1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme gene coding region plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-18-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.3endo-1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme gene coding region plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
145735-56-4
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pcGS2-17 glutamine synthetase isoenzyme 2 messenger RNA-complementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-22-1
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pGL31 endo1,3-E- glucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-23-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pGL36 endo1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-24-3
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pGL43 endo1,3-E-glucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143341-58-6
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco clone pMG15 extensin-like protein messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
128512-26-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco endo-1,3-Eglucanase isoenzyme messenger RNAcomplementary plus 5'- and 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143341-53-1
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco extensin-like protein 171-amino acid C-terminal fragmentspecifying plus 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143341-54-2
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco extensin-like protein 264-amino acid C-terminal fragmentspecifying plus 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
143341-57-5
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, (tobacco extensin-like protein 393-amino acid C-terminal fragmentspecifying plus 3'-flanking region fragment)
XXII-2
139637-37-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, d(A-T-G-T-T-C-T-C-T-C-T-TT-T-A-A-T-G-G-T-G-G-T-T-C-T-T-T-A-G)
XXII-2
152789-83-8
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, d(C-A-T-C-A-C-G-T-G-A-GA-T-A-A-G-A-G-C-C-G-C-C-A), double-stranded complementary
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1583
11/24/08 1:56:09 PM
1584
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
152789-84-9
0
1
0
Deoxyribonucleic acid, d(T-A-A-A-G-T-C-A-A-A-GA-A-T-T-T-C-A-A-T-G-T-C-A-C-A), doublestranded complementary
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XXII-2
67880-95-9
0
1
0
Desaturase, fatty acid Z3-
XXII-2
159965-67-0
0
1
0
Desaturase, fatty acid Z3- (tobacco clone Ntfad3)
XXII-2
107544-21-8
0
1
0
Desaturase, phytoene
XXII-2
9004-53-9
0
1
0
Dextrin
37340-89-9
0
1
0
Diaphorase
II.A-5, VIII-3
5385-75-1
1
0
0
Dibenz[a,e]aceanthrylene {dibenzo[a,e]fluoranthene}
I.E-6
189-75-3
1
0
0
Dibenz[j,mno]aceanthrylene
I.E-6
71630-69-8
1
0
0
Dibenz[j,mno]aceanthrylene, methyl-
226-36-8
1
0
0
Dibenz[a,h]acridine
226-92-6
1
0
0
Dibenz[a,i]acridine
XVII.E-6
224-42-0
1
0
0
Dibenz[a,j]acridine
XVII.E-6
224-53-3
1
0
0
Dibenz[c,h]acridine
XVII.E-6
67775-07-9
1
0
0
Dibenzanthracene
53-70-3
1
0
0
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
224-41-9
1
0
0
Dibenz[a,j]anthracene
4607-33-4
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,h][1]benzopyrano[2,3,4de][1,6]naphthyridine
XVII.E-8
34442-52-9
1
0
0
1H-Dibenzo[a,c]carbazole
XVII.E-6
XXII-2
I.E-6 XVII.E-6
I.E-6 {DB[a,h]A}
I.E-6
I.E-6
c
g f
h
a
i
N H
207-84-1
1
1
1
7H-Dibenzo[a,g]carbazole
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1584
11/24/08 1:56:09 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1585
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
239-64-5
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
13H-Dibenzo[a,i]carbazole
XVII.E-6
c
g f
h
Chapter Table
a
i
N H
194-59-2
1
0
0
7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole
XVII.E-6 c
g f
h
a
i
N H
28641-62-5
1
0
0
5H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole
189-64-0
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,def]chrysene
191-26-4
1
0
0
Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene
64760-24-3
1
0
41699-10-9
1
XVII.E-6 {dibenzo[a,h]pyrene}
I.E-6
{anthanthrene}
I.E-6
0
Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene, dimethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
0
0
Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene, methyl{at least 2, possibly 3, isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
1
0
0
Dibenzo[def,mno]chrysene, 6-methyl-
I.E-6
191-30-0
1
0
0
Dibenzo[def,p]chrysene
I.E-6
191-68-4
1
0
0
Dibenzo[g,p]chrysene
1210-35-1
1
0
0
5H-Dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-one, 10,11-dihydro-
262-12-4
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin
{dibenzo[a,l]pyrene}
I.E-6
III-13 8
O
7 6
35822-46-9
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, polychloro-
1
1
1
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachloro-
2 3
O
5
X-2
1
4
X-2, XVIII.B-3 X-2, XVIII.B-3
Cl Cl
Cl
O
Cl
O Cl
Cl Cl
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,9-heptachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
39227-28-6
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
57653-85-7
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
19408-74-3
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
40321-76-4
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 1,2,3,7,8-pentachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
1746-01-6
1
1
1
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1585
11/24/08 1:56:10 PM
1586
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
37871-00-4
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, heptachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
34465-46-8
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
3268-87-9
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, octachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
36088-22-9
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, pentachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
41903-57-5
1
0
0
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin, tetrachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
60382-88-9
1
0
0
Dibenzofluoranthene {at least two isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
203-18-9
1
0
0
Dibenzo[j,l]fluoranthene
I.E-6
239-60-1
1
0
0
13H-Dibenzo[a,i]fluorene
I.E-6
132-64-9
1
1
1
Dibenzofuran
{2,2’-biphenylene oxide}
1
X-2
2 3
O
4
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, dimethyl-
X-2
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, methyl-
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, polychloro-
67562-39-4
1
1
1
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
55673-89-7
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-heptachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
70648-26-9
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
X-2 {dioxins}
X-2, XVIII.B-3
91538-84-0
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,7,9-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
67517-48-0
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,8-pentachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
57117-44-9
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
72918-21-9
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
57117-41-6
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8-pentachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
7320-50-5
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1-methyl-
60851-34-5
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,6,7,8-hexachloro-
57117-31-4
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,7,8-pentachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
83704-32-9
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,8-tetrachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3 X-2, XVIII.B-3
51207-31-9
X-2 X-2, XVIII.B-3
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 1-methyl-
X-2
7320-51-6
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 2-methyl-
X-2
7320-52-7
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 3-methyl-
X-2
7320-53-8
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, 4-methyl-
X-2
9062-95-1
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, dimethyl-
X-2
38998-75-3
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, heptachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
55684-94-1
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, hexachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
60826-62-2
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, methyl-
X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1586
11/24/08 1:56:10 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1587
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
39001-02-0
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, octachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
30402-15-4
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, pentachloro-
X-2, XVIII.B-3
30402-14-3
1
0
0
Dibenzofuran, tetrachloro-
3693-22-9
1
0
0
2-Dibenzofuranamine
4106-66-5
1
0
0
3-Dibenzofuranamine
216-00-2
1
0
0
Dibenzo[a,c]naphthacene
I.E-6
227-04-3
1
0
0
Dibenzo[a,j]naphthacene
I.E-6
193-09-9
1
0
0
Dibenzo[de,qr]naphthacene {naphtho[2,3-d]pyrene}
I.E-6
192-51-8
1
0
0
Dibenzo[fg,op]naphthacene
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
X-2, XVIII.B-3 X-2, XII-2
NH2
O
X-2, XII-2
I.E-6 {dibenzo[e,l]pyrene}
26894-49-5
0
1
0
6H-Dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one, 3,7(3,9 or 7,9)dihydroxy-9(7 or 3)-methoxy-1-methyl-
VI-3, X-2, IX.A-22
OCH3
OH HO
29752-43-0
0
1
0
O
O
6H-Dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one, 9-methoxy-4a-methyl2,3,4,4a-tetrahydro-2,3,7-trihydroxy- (2D,3E,4aE)-
VI-3, X-2, IX.A-22
OCH3
HO
OH
HO
O
O CH3
641-38-3
0
1
0
6H-Dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one, 1-methyl-3,7,9trihydroxy-
VI-3, IX.A-22
OH CH3 OH HO
O
O
58615-36-4
1
0
0
Dibenzopyrene
132-65-0
1
1
1
Dibenzothiophene
XVIII.A-1
I.E-6
70021-47-5
0
1
0
Dibenzothiophene, dimethyl{at least four isomers detected}
XVIII.A-1
30995-64-3
1
1
1
Dibenzothiophene, methyl{at least four isomers detected}
XVIII.A-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1587
11/24/08 1:56:11 PM
1588
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
188-94-3
1
0
0
Diindeno[1,2,3-cd:1',2',3'-lm]perylene
309-00-2
1
1
1
1,4:5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10hexachloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-, (1D,4D,4aE,5D,8D,8aE)- [endo, endo] {Aldrin®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table I.E-6
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl Cl Cl
CCl2
CH2
Cl
465-73-6
0
1
0
1,4:5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene, 1,2,3,4,10,10hexachloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-, (1D,4D,4aE,5E,8E,8aE)- [endo, exo] {Isodrin®}
XVIII.B-3, , XXI-3
60-57-1
1
1
1
2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth[2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a-octahydro-, (1aD,2E,2aD,3E,6E,6aD,7E,7aD){Dieldrin®}
X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
72-20-8
1
1
1
2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth[2,3-b]oxirene, 3,4,5,6,9,9hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a-octahydro-, (1aD,2E,2aE,3D,6D,6aE,7E,7aD){Endrin®}
X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
119973-29-4
1
0
0
26,27-Dinorergosta-3,5-diene
I.C-1
119973-31-8
1
0
0
26,27-Dinorergosta-3,5,22-triene, (22E)-
I.C-1 I.C-1
119973-30-7
1
0
0
26,27-Dinorergost-3-ene, (5D)-
117210-53-4
0
1
0
2,7-Dioxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 1,3-dimethyl-3-(4methyl-3-pentenyl)-, endo-
X-2
117305-90-5
0
1
0
2,7-Dioxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane, 1,3-dimethyl-3-(4methyl-3-pentenyl)-, exo-
X-2
121927-15-9
0
1
0
13,14-Dioxabicyclo[10.2.2]hexadec-6-ene-2,3,5triol, 1,5-dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R-(1R*,2S*,3R*,5S*,
II.A-5, X-2
52886-15-4
0
1
0
2,9-Dioxabicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-4-ol, 1,3,3-trimethyl-6(1-methylethyl){2 isomers reported}
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane, 1,5-dimethyl{frontalin}
0
1
0
6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-7-methanol, 2-(1methylethyl)-D,5-dimethyl- [1D,2E,5D,7D(R*)]
58001-00-6
X-2 II.A-5, X-2
CH3 O O HO
CH3
CH3
CH3
58001-10-8
0
1
0
6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-7-methanol, 2-(1methylethyl)-D,D,5-trimethyl-, (2-endo,7-exo)-(±)-
II.A-5, X-2
CH3 O O HO H3C
52992-36-6
0
1
0
6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-7-methanol, 2-(1methylethyl)-D,D,5-trimethyl-
CH3
CH3
CH3
II.A-5, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1588
11/24/08 1:56:12 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1589
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
37112-31-5
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) 6,8-Dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-en-4-one, (1S){levoglucosenone}
16279-34-8
1
0
0
1,4-Dioxane, 2-methyl-
162188-91-2
1
0
0
1,4-Dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-8-one, 7-(acetyloxy)7,9,9-trimethyl-, (r)-
Selected structures O
X-2 O
H3C
8
9
5
O
1
1
0
1,6-Dioxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one, 3,4,7-trimethyl-
0
1,3-Dioxalane-4-methanol, 2,2-dimethyl-
5 1
1
0
0
1,3-Dioxalan-2-one
{ethylene glycol carbonate}
4
CH3
H3C
5 4
O CH3
3
II.A-5, X-2
CH 2OH
O
H3C
96-49-1
III-13
CH3
O
0
O
3
6
2
1
CH3
6
7
O
100-79-8
III-13
OOC-CH3 7
4
2
0
III-13, X-2
O
O
H3C
41059-94-3
Chapter Table
O
V-3
1 O O
2 O 3
931-40-8
1
0
0
1,3-Dioxalan-2-one, 4-(hydroxymethyl){glycerol carbonate}
V-3
108-32-7
1
1
1
1,3-Dioxalan-2-one, 4-methyl{1,2-propylene glycol carbonate}
V-3
9025-33-6
0
1
0
Dipeptidase, prolyl
1
0
0
Dipropoxymethane
1
0
0
Dipyrido[1,2-a:3',2'-d]imidazol-2-amine {Glu-P-2}
67730-10-3
XXII-2 (C3H7O)2=CH2 N
X-2 NH2
XVII.F-6
N N
67730-11-4
1
0
0
Dipyrido[1,2-a:3',2'-d]imidazol-2-amine, 6-methyl{Glu-P-1}
N
NH2
XVII.F-6
N N CH3
484-73-1
1
0
0
5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1',2'-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione {pyrocoll}
XVII.E-8
O N N O
59017-02-6
1
0
0
5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1',2'-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione, 1,2,3,5a,8,10a-hexahydro-, (5aS-cis)-
XVII.E-8
1
0
0
5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1',2'-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione, 1,2,3,5a,8,10a-hexahydro-3-methyl-
XVII.E-8
71277-95-7
1
0
0
5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1',2'-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione, methyl-
XVII.E-8
6708-06-1
1
0
0
5H,10H-Dipyrrolo[1,2-a:1',2'-d]pyrazine-5,10-dione, octahydro-
XVII.E-8
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1589
11/24/08 1:56:12 PM
1590
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
9054-89-1
0
1
0
Dismutase, superoxide
XXII-2
143352-40-3
0
1
0
Dismutase, superoxide (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone pSOD3 copper-zinc protein moiety reduced)
XXII-2
5905-46-4
1
0
0
Disulfide, 1-propenyl propyl
110-81-6
1
0
0
Disulfide, diethyl
H3C-CH2-S-CH2-CH3
XVIII.A-1
624-92-0
1
1
1
Disulfide, dimethyl
H3C-S-S-CH3
XVIII.A-1
XVIII.A-1
20333-39-5
1
0
0
Disulfide, ethyl methyl
XVIII.A-1
5905-47-5
1
0
0
Disulfide, methyl 1-propenyl
XVIII.A-1
2179-60-4
1
0
0
Disulfide, methyl propyl
21548-32-3
0
1
0
1,3-Dithietan-2-ylidenephosphoramidic acid, diethyl ester {Fosthietan®}
XVIII.A-1 OC2H5
S N
O
P
S
947-02-4
0
1
0
Dithiolan-2-ylidenephosphoramidic acid, diethyl ester {Cyolane®; Phosfolan®}
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
OC2H5
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
O
S N
P
OC2H5
S OC2H5
2439-01-2
0
1
0
1,3-Dithiolo[4,5-b]quinoxalin-2-one, 6-methyl{Quinomethionate®}
N
S O
N
S
29564-66-7
0
1
0
Docosadienoic acid, (Z,Z)-
629-97-0
1
1
1
Docosane
H3C-(CH2)20-CH3
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 IV.A-3 I.A-10
1560-81-2
1
1
1
Docosane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)=CH-(CH2)19-CH3
I.A-10
72227-00-0
1
1
1
Docosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)18-CH3
I.A-10
112-85-6
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)20-COOH
IV.A-3
17671-27-1
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42233-07-8
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
{behenic acid}
42233-14-7
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
5908-87-2
1
0
0
Docosanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
42233-15-8
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
121877-99-4
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
42233-12-5
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
55136-77-1
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
42233-11-4
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
42233-13-6
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
21511-31-9
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, octacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)27-CH3
V-3
24271-12-3
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
42233-10-3
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42233-17-0
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
42233-09-0
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
1
0
0
Docosanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester
42233-16-9
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)32-CH3
V-3
42233-08-9
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)20-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1590
11/24/08 1:56:13 PM
1591
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
36332-95-3
0
1
0
Docosanoic acid, 20-methyl-
H3C-CH2 CH(CH3)-(CH2)18-COOH
121877-76-7
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, 20-methyl-, docosyl ester
121877-62-1
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, 20-methyl-, eicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3 H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
121877-71-2
1
1
1
Docosanoic acid, 20-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
59708-74-6
0
1
0
Docosanoic acid, 21-methyl-
661-19-8
1
1
1
1-Docosanol
0
1
0
1-Docosanol, 20-methyl-
0
1
0
1-Docosanol, 21-methyl-
1
0
0
1-Docosene
H3C-(CH2)19-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Docosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)19-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Docosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)18-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Docosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Docosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)18-CH3
1
0
0
2-Docosene, 20-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)16-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Docosene, 20-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Docosene, 21-methyl-, (Z)-
1599-67-3
{behenyl alcohol}
IV.A-3
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3 (H3C)2=CH-(CH2)19-COOH
IV.A-3
H3C-(CH2)20-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5
I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)17-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Docosene, 21-methyl-, (E)-
112-86-7
0
1
0
13-Docosenoic acid, (Z)-
I.B-1
65596-29-4
0
1
0
3,6-Dodecadienedioic acid, 10-hydroxy-4,9dimethyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
40596-69-8
1
1
1
2,4-Dodecadienoic acid, 11-methoxy-3,7,11trimethyl-, 1-methylethyl ester, (E,E){Methoprene®; Altoside®}
IV.A-3, XXI-3
0
1
0
2,4-Dodecadienoic acid, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethyl)9-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
7226-86-0
1
0
0
2,6-Dodecadien-1-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-
117232-64-1
0
1
0
5,10-Dodecadien-2-one, 9-hydroxy-6,11-dimethyl-
112-40-3
1
1
1
Dodecane
H3C-(CH2)10-CH3
I.A-10
1560-97-0
1
0
0
Dodecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)9-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
17312-57-1
1
1
1
Dodecane, 3-methyl-
3891-98-3
1
1
1
Dodecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl-
IV.A-3
II.A-5 II.A-5, III-13
H3C-(CH2)8-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 (farnesane)
I.A-10 I.A-10
693-23-2
1
0
0
Dodecanedioic acid
143-07-7
1
1
1
Dodecanoic acid
71278-23-4
1
1
1
Dodecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester
V-3
71278-24-5
1
0
0
Dodecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester
V-3
36617-18-2
1
1
1
Dodecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
106-33-2
0
1
0
Dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester
111-82-0
0
1
0
Dodecanoic acid, methyl ester
HOOC-(CH2)10-COOH {lauric acid}
{ethyl laurate}
H 3C-(CH2)10-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3, XXI-3
H3C-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
H 3C-(CH2)10-COO-C2H5
V-3
H3C-(CH2)10-COO-CH3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1591
11/24/08 1:56:13 PM
1592
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
7416-57-1
0
1
0
Dodecanoic acid, 10-methyl-
H3C-CH2 CH(CH3)-(CH2)8-COOH
121877-15-4
1
1
1
Dodecanoic acid, 10-methyl-, eicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)8-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
IV.A-3
121877-10-9
1
1
1
Dodecanoic acid, 11-methyl-, eicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)9-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
112-53-8
1
1
1
1-Dodecanol
H3C-(CH2)10-CH2OH
6750-34-1
0
1
0
1-Dodecanol, 3,7,11-trimethyl- {hexahydrofarnesol}
6175-49-1
0
1
0
2-Dodecanone
502-61-4
1
0
0
1,3,6,10-Dodecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (E,E){D-farnesene}
I.B-1
1
0
0
2,6,9,11-Dodecatetraen-1-ol, 2,6,10-trimethyl-, (2E,6E,9E){Į-sinensol}
II.A-5
1
0
0
2,6,10,?-Dodecatetraenol
{dehydrofarnesol}
II.A-5
1
0
0
1,6,10-Dodecatriene, 7,11-dimethyl-3-methylene-, (E){E-farnesene}
I.B-1
18794-84-8 3899-18-1
{lauryl alcohol}
V-3
II.A-5, XXI-3 II.A-5
H3C-(CH2)9-CO-CH3
III-13
1
0
0
2,6,10-Dodecatriene, 2,6,10-trimethyl-, (E,E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2,6,10-Dodecatriene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-
I.B-1
7548-13-2
0
1
0
2,6,10-Dodecatrienoic acid, 3,7,11-trimethyl-
7212-44-4
1
1
1
1,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl{nerolidol}
II.A-5
142-50-7
0
1
0
1,6,10-Dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, [S-(Z)]-
II.A-5
4602-84-0 3790-71-4
1
1
1
2,6,10-Dodecatrien-1-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl{sinensol; farnesol}
II.A-5, XXI-3
1
0
0
2,6,10-Dodecatrien-1-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl{farnesol isomer}
II.A-5
1
1
1
2,6,10-Dodecatrien-1-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, acetate {farnesyl acetate}
V-3
0
1
0
2,6,10-Dodecatrien-1-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, formate {farnesyl formate}
V-3
25378-22-7
1
0
0
Dodecene
112-41-4
1
0
0
1-Dodecene
H2C=CH-(CH2)9-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Dodecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)9-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Dodecene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)8-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Dodecene, 10-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)6-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Dodecene, 10-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Dodecene, 11-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Dodecene, 11-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
Dodecenoic acid
4412-16-2
0
1
0
2-Dodecenoic acid
544-85-4
1
1
1
Dotriacontane
H3C-(CH2)30-CH3
29548-30-9
IV.A-3
I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)7-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1 IV.A-3 IV.A-3 I.A-10
1720-11-2
1
1
1
Dotriacontane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)29-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
20129-49-1
1
1
1
Dotriacontane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)28-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
16753-27-8
1
1
1
Dotriacontane-16,17- C2, labeled with C
3625-52-3
1
0
0
Dotriacontanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)30-COOH
121878-06-6
1
1
1
Dotriacontanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)30-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
14
14
I.A-10 IV.A-3 V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1592
11/24/08 1:56:14 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1593
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
66309-89-5
1
0
0
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30-Dotriacontaoctaene, 2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30-octamethyl-, (all-E)-
I.B-1
85792-05-8
1
0
0
Dotriacontene
I.B-1
18435-55-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
1-Dotriacontene
H2C=CH-(CH2)29-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Dotriacontene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)28-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Dotriacontene, (E)-
7429-91-6
1
1
1
Dysprosium
9007-57-2
0
1
0
Edestin
I.B-1 Dy
25448-01-5
0
1
0
Eicosadienoic acid
2400-66-0
0
1
0
Eicosanal
H3C-(CH2)18-CH=O H3C-(CH2)18-CH3
112-95-8
XX-5 XXII-2 IV.A-3 III-12
1
1
1
Eicosane
0
1
0
Eicosane, methyl-
I.A-10
1
0
0
Eicosane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)17-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
0
1
0
Eicosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)16-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
4616-73-3
1
0
0
Eicosanenitrile
H3C-(CH2)18-CN
I.A-10
{arachidic acid}
H3C-(CH2)18-COOH
XI-2
506-30-9
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid
42232-87-1
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
IV.A-3 V-3
42232-82-6
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
22432-80-0
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
42218-26-8
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
121877-87-0
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
36610-58-9
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
17318-45-5
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
22413-05-4
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1120-28-1
1
0
0
Eicosanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-CH3
V-3
36610-60-3
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
55309-61-0
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, octacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)27-CH3
V-3
22432-79-7
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
121877-79-0
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
36665-69-7
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42232-89-3
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
22413-04-3
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
71278-14-3
1
0
0
Eicosanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester
V-3
42232-88-2
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)32-CH3
V-3
36610-55-6
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)18-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
36332-93-1
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, 18-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)16-COOH IV.A-3
121877-60-9
1
1
1
Eicosanoic acid, 18-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
59708-73-5
0
1
0
Eicosanoic acid, 19-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)17-COOH
629-96-9
1
1
1
1-Eicosanol
0
1
0
1-Eicosanol, 18-methyl-
{arachic alcohol}
H3C-(CH2)18-CH2OH
IV.A-3 II.A-5 II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1593
11/24/08 1:56:14 PM
1594
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
1-Eicosanol, 19-methyl-
II.A-5
4340-76-5
1
0
0
2-Eicosanol
II.A-5
7431-92-7
1
0
0
2,6,10,14,18-Eicosapentaene, 2,6,10,14,18pentamethyl-, (all-E)-
75581-03-2
1
0
0
2,6,10,14,18-Eicosapentaene, 2,6,10,14,18pentamethyl-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2,6,10,14,18-Eicosapentaene, 2,6,10,14,18pentamethyl{isomer}
I.B-1
506-32-1
1
1
1
5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraenoic acid, (all-Z){arachidonic acid}
IV.A-3
55682-88-7
0
1
0
11,14,17-Eicosatrienoic acid, methyl ester
1
0
0
Eicosene
1
1
1
1-Eicosene
H2C=CH-(CH2)17-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Eicosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)17-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)16-CH3
I.B-1
3452-07-1
26764-41-0
H-[CH2-C(CH3)=CH-CH2]5-H
I.B-1
V-3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)16-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, 18-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)14-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, 18-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, 19-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Eicosene, 19-methyl-, (E)-
1
1
1
Eicosenoic acid
I.B-1 I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)15-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1 IV.A-3
22104-85-4
0
1
0
2-Eicosen-1-ol
159844-36-7
0
1
0
Enzyme E 2 (Arabidopsis thaliana clone TAY029 gene UbcAt3 ubiquitin-carrier)
H3C-(CH2)16-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5
38419-69-1
0
1
0
6H-3,10b-Epoxy-1H-naphtho[2,1-b]pyran, decahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [3S(3D,4aE,6aD,10aE,10bD)]-
7440-52-0
1
1
1
Erbium
474-62-4
1
1
1
Ergost-5-en-3-ol, (3E,24R)-
26047-31-4
0
1
0
Ergost-7-en-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
17105-75-8
1
0
0
Ergost-7-en-3-ol, (3E,24[)-
II.B-2
33860-48-9
0
1
0
Ergost-8-en-3-ol, 14-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
16910-33-1
0
1
0
Ergost-8-en-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
70116-48-2
0
1
0
Ergost-8-en-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D,24[)-
II.B-2
77327-07-2
1
0
0
Ergosta-3,5,7-triene, (24[)-
XXII-2 X-2
XX-5 II.B-2
{campesterol}
I.C-1 R
R = -(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH(CH3)2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1594
11/24/08 1:56:15 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1595
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
19254-69-4
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
Ergosta-4,6,8(14),22-tetraen-3-one, (22E)-
III-13 CH3 H3C
1
CH3
H3C
2
H3C
8 3
O
4
CH3
5
7 6
474-67-9
0
1
0
Ergosta-5,22-dien-3-ol, (3E,22E)-
II.B-2
474-63-5
0
1
0
Ergosta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
52936-69-3
0
1
0
Ergosta-5,25-dien-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
57-87-4
1
1
1
Ergosta-5,7,22-trien-3-ol, (3E,22E)-
II.B-2
{ergosterol} CH3 H3C
CH3 CH3
H3C H3C
HO
21490-25-5
0
1
0
Ergosta-7,24(28)-dien-3E-ol, 4E-methyl-
II.B-2
474-68-0
0
1
0
Ergosta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
1176-52-9
0
1
0
Ergosta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
74635-33-9
0
1
0
Ergosta-8,14,24(28)-trien-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
23839-47-6
0
1
0
Ergosta-8,14-dien-3-ol, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
33886-74-7
0
1
0
Ergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 14-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
16910-32-0
0
1
0
Ergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
80736-41-0
0
1
0
Ergostan-6-one, 2,3,22,23-tetrahydroxy-, (2D,3D,5D,22R, 23R,24S)-
III-13, II.B-2
121468-15-3
0
1
0
Ergostan-6-one, 2,3,22,23-tetrahydroxy-, (2D,3E,5D,22R,23R,24S)-
III-13, II.B-2
92751-21-8
0
1
0
Ergostan-6-one, 3,22,23-trihydroxy-, (3E,5D,22R,23R,24S)-
III-13, II.B-2
87734-68-7
0
1
0
Ergostan-6-one, 3,22,23-trihydroxy-, (3D,5D,22R,23R,24S)-
III-13, II.B-2
0
1
0
Erlose (a trisaccharide)
9013-79-0
0
1
0
Esterase
XXII-2
9025-98-3
0
1
0
Esterase, pectin
XXII-2
75-04-7
1
1
1
Ethanamine
51-75-2
1
0
0
Ethanamine, 2-chloro-N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-methyl-
(Cl-CH2-CH2)2=N-CH3
121-44-8
1
1
1
Ethanamine, N,N-diethyl-
(H3C-CH2)3ŁN
XII-2
(H3C-CH2)2=NH
XII-2
(H3C-CH2)2=N-NO
XV-8
H3C-CH2-NH-CH3
XII-2
H3C-CH2-N(NO)-CH3
XV-8
II.A-5
{ethylamine} {triethylamine}
1
0
0
Ethanamine, N,1-dimethyl-N-nitroso-
109-89-7
1
1
1
Ethanamine, N-ethyl-
55-18-5
1
1
1
Ethanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitroso-
624-78-2
1
1
1
Ethanamine, N-methyl-
10595-95-6
1
1
1
Ethanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-
H3C-CH2-NH2
XII-2 XII-2, XVIII.B-3 XV-8
{diethylamine} {NDEA} {NEMA}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1595
11/24/08 1:56:15 PM
1596
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
97190-07-3
0
1
0
Ethanaminium, 2-[[(2,3dihydroxypropoxy)hydroxyphosphinyl]oxy]-N,N,Ntrimethyl-, hydroxide, inner salt, monooctadecadienoate monooctadecatrienoate, (all-Z)-
XII-2
97190-09-5
0
1
0
Ethanaminium, 2-[[(2,3dihydroxypropoxy)hydroxyphosphinyl]oxy]-N,N,Ntrimethyl-, hydroxide, inner salt, monohexadecanoate monooctadecatrienoate, (Z,Z,Z)-
XII-2
97190-10-8
0
1
0
Ethanaminium, 2-[[(2,3dihydroxypropoxy)hydroxyphosphinyl]oxy]-N,N,Ntrimethyl-, hydroxide, inner salt, monohexadecanoate monooctadecadienoate, (Z,Z)-
XII-2
97190-12-0
0
1
0
Ethanaminium, 2-[[(2,3dihydroxypropoxy)hydroxyphosphinyl]oxy]-N,N,Ntrimethyl-, hydroxide, inner salt, monooctadecadienoate
XII-2
62-49-7 123-41-1
0
1
0
Ethanaminium, 2-hydroxy-N,N,N-trimethyl{choline}
8002-43-5
0
1
0
Ethanaminium, 2-hydroxy-N,N,N-trimethyl-, phosphatidyl{lecithin}
74-84-0
1
0
0
Ethane
0
1
0
Ethane, bis(4-methylphenyl)-
624-89-5
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
+
HO-(CH2)2-N Ł(CH3)3
Chapter Table
XII-2 XII-2
H3C-CH3
I.A-10 I.D-1
1
0
0
Ethane, (methylthio)-
1
1
1
Ethane, 1-chloro-2-bromotetrafluoro{Freon® 114b1}
ClF2C-CF2Br
XVIII.B-3
XVIII.A-1
75-88-7
1
1
1
Ethane, 1-chloro-2,2,2-trifluoro-
ClCH2-CF3
XVIII.B-3
60-29-7
1
1
1
Ethane, 1,1'-oxybis-
352-93-2
1
0
0
Ethane, 1,1'-thiobis-
106-93-4
0
1
0
Ethane, 1,2-dibromo{ethylene dibromide, EDB®, Bromofume®}
{Freon® 133a} {ethyl ether}
X-2 XVIII.A-1
107-06-2
1
0
0
Ethane, 1,2-dichloro-
306-83-2
1
1
1
Ethane, 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoro- {Freon® 123}
Br-CH2-CH2-Br
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XVIII.B-3
Cl 2CH-CF3
XVIII.B-3
104-66-5
0
1
0
Ethane, 1,2-diphenoxy-
C6H5-O-CH2CH2-OC6H5
75-00-3
1
0
0
Ethane, chloro-
C2H5-Cl
540-67-0
1
0
0
Ethane, methoxy-
C2H5-O-CH3
79-24-3
1
0
0
Ethane, nitro-
C2H5-NO2
71-55-6
1
0
0
Ethane, 1,1,1-trichloro-
H3C-CŁCl3
72-43-5
0
1
0
Ethane, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-methoxyphenyl){Methoxychlor®}
X-2 XVIII.B-3 X-2 XVI-1 XVIII.B-3
O
O
CCl3
X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 811-97-2
1
1
1
Ethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoro-
{Freon® 134a}
25323-89-1
0
1
0
Ethane, 1,2,2-trichloro-
151-67-7
1
1
1
Ethane, 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-bromo-2-chloro{Freon® 123b1, Halothane}
FCH2-CF3
XVIII.B-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
ClBrCH-CF3
XVIII.B-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1596
11/24/08 1:56:16 PM
1597
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
107-22-2
1
1
1
Ethanedial
460-19-5
1
0
0
Ethanedinitrile
0
1
0
Ethanedioate
1
1
1
Ethanedioic acid
1
1
1
Ethanedioic acid, labeled with C 14 {oxalic acid- C}
14258-49-2
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, ammonium salt
17787-48-3
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, calcium salt (1:1), hydrate (2:5)
XX-6
25454-23-3
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, calcium salt
XX-6
144-62-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{glyoxal} {cyanogen}
O=CH-CH=O
III-12
NC-CN
XI-2
{oxalate} {oxalic acid}
XX-6 HOOC-COOH
IV.A-3
14
XXV-29 XX-6
95-92-1
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, diethyl ester
583-52-8
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, dipotassium salt
XX-6
6018-94-6
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, nickel salt
XX-6
17480-26-1
0
1
0
Ethanedioic acid, tin salt
542-10-9
1
0
0
1,1-Ethanediol, diacetate
107-21-1
1
1
1
1,2-Ethanediol
111-55-7
1
0
0
1,2-Ethanediol, diacetate
V-3
{stannous oxalate}
XX-6 V-3
{ethylene glycol}
HOCH2-CH2OH
II.A-5 V-3
534-82-7
0
1
0
1,2-Ethanediol, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-
542-59-6
1
0
0
1,2-Ethanediol, monoacetate {acetic acid, 2-hydroxyethyl ester}
HO-(CH2) 2-OOC-CH3
134-81-6
1
0
0
Ethanedione, diphenyl-
107-35-7
0
1
0
Ethanesulfonic acid, 2-amino-
C6H5-CO-CO-C6H5 H2N-(CH2)2-SO3H
{benzil} {taurine} {ethyl mercaptan}
II.A-5 II.A-5, V-3 III-13 XII-2, XVIII.A-1
75-08-1
1
0
0
Ethanethiol
40460-44-4
0
1
0
1,1,2-Ethanetriol
C2H5-SH
XVIII.A-1
23135-22-0
0
1
0
Ethanimidothioic acid, 2-(dimethylamino)-N[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]-2-oxo-, methyl ester {Oxamyl®}
(H3C)2=N-CO-C(S-CH3)=N-OOC-NH-CH3 V-3, XXI-3
59669-26-0
0
1
0
Ethanimidothioic acid, N',N'(thiobis((methylimino)carbonyloxy))bis-, dimethyl ester {Thiodicarb®}
S=[NH-COO-N=C(CH3)-SCH3]2
XXI-3
64-17-5
1
1
1
Ethanol
H3C-CH2OH
II.A-5
108-01-0
1
0
0
Ethanol, 2-(dimethylamino)-
II.A-5
{ethyl alcohol}
109-83-1
0
1
0
Ethanol, 2-(methylamino)-
1116-54-7
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2,2'-(nitrosoimino)bis-
112-27-6
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2,2'-(1,2-ethanediylbis(oxy))bis{triethylene glycol}
111-21-7
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2,2'-[1,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)]bis-, diacetate
112-60-7
0
1
0
Ethanol, 2,2'-[oxybis(2,1-ethanediyloxy)]bis{tetraethylene glycol}
30934-97-5
1
0
0
Ethanol, 2,2-dimethoxy-
111-42-2
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2,2'-iminobis-
111-46-6
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2,2'-oxybis-
{NDELA}
(H3C)2=N-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5, XII-2
H3C-NH-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5, XII-2
(HO-CH 2CH2)2=N-NO
XV-8
HO-(CH2) 2-O-(CH2) 2-O-(CH2) 2-OH II.A-5 V-3 II.A-5 II.A-5, X-2
{diethanolamine}
(HO-CH 2CH2)2=NH
II.A-5, XII-2
{diethylene glycol}
(HO-CH 2CH2)2=O
II.A-5
{ethanolamine}
HO-CH2CH2-NH2
II.A-5, XII-2
141-43-5
0
1
0
Ethanol, 2-amino-
1071-23-4
0
1
0
Ethanol, 2-amino-, dihydrogen phosphate (ester)
78-51-3
1
0
0
Ethanol, 2-butoxy-, phosphate (3:1)
XII-2 [H3C-(CH2)3-O-(CH2)2]3ŁP=O
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1597
11/24/08 1:56:16 PM
1598
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
110-80-5
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2-ethoxy-
HO-CH2CH2-O-CH2CH3
II.A-5, X-2
109-86-4
1
1
1
Ethanol, 2-methoxy-
HO-CH2CH2-O-CH3
II.A-5, X-2
C6H5O-CH2CH2-OH
II.A-5, X-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
122-99-6
0
1
0
Ethanol, 2-phenoxy-
1321-27-3
1
1
1
Ethanol, phenyl-: Previously listed as 60-12-8 Benzeneethanol
115-32-2
0
1
0
Ethanol, 2,2,2-trichloro-1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl){Dicofol®}
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5 Cl
Cl
Cl3C
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
OH
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(alkyl-1H-pyrrolyl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
78210-69-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(1,2-dihydro-2-methyl-3-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
117210-49-8
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-4a,8,8trimethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-, (4aR-trans)-
III-13
932-66-1
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
III-13
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(dimethylphenyl){dimethylacetophenone}
III-13
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(methylphenyl){methylacetophenone}
III-13
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(methyl-1H-pyrrolyl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
20583-33-9
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(1H-pyrazol-3-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
25016-16-4
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
1072-83-9
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl){2-acetylpyrrole; methyl 2-pyrrolyl ketone}
III-13, XVII.A-4
1072-82-8
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(1H-pyrrol-3-yl){3-acetylpyrrole; methyl 3-pyrrolyl ketone}
III-13, XVII.A-4
26444-19-9
711-79-5
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(1-hydroxy-2-naphthalenyl)-
III-13
20970-50-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(1-methyl-1H-imidazol-5-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
37687-18-6
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
932-16-1
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13, XVII.A-4
932-62-7
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-
70987-81-4
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(1,2,3-trimethyl-2-cyclopenten-2-yl)-
779-90-8
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1,1’,1”-(1,3,5-benzenetriyl)tris{1,3,5-triacetylbenzene}
III-13 III-13
CO-CH3
H3C-CO
CO-CH3
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-alkylphenyl)-
55041-85-5
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrrolizin-5-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
19005-95-9
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,4,5-trimethyl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
85213-22-5
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-yl){2-acetylpyrroline}
III-13, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,5-dihydro-5-methyl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-
490-78-8
III-13
III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13, IX.A-22
OH 3 2
4 5
CO-CH3
HO
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1598
11/24/08 1:56:17 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1599
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1500-94-3
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-
1197-92-8
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
699-83-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2,6-dihydroxyphenyl)-
1192-62-7
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl)-
Selected structures
III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13 III-13, IX.A-22
{2-acetylfuran}
III-13, X-2 O
19859-79-1
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl)-2-(acetyloxy)-
17678-19-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-furanyl)-2-hydroxy-
Chapter Table
CO-CH3
III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2 O
703-98-0
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-
6921-64-8
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)-
1450-72-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)-
703-23-1
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxy-6-methoxyphenyl)-
CO-CH2OH
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2 III-13, IX.A-22 III-13, IX.A-22 III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxy-6-methylphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
118-93-4
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
78210-66-9
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-methyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)-
577-16-2
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(2-methylphenyl){2-methylacetophenone}
III-13
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-phenyl]-
III-13
III-13, XVII.A-4
1122-62-9
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(2-pyridinyl)-
{2-acetylpyridine}
III-13, XVII.B-2
60026-20-2
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(2-pyrrolidinyl)- {2-acetylpyrrolidine}
III-13, XVII.A-4
24295-03-2
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-thiazolyl)-
88-15-3
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-thienyl)-
{2-acetylthiazole}
III-13, XVIII.A-1
{2-acetylthiophene}
III-13, XVIII.A-1
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[2,3-dihydro-2-(1-methylethyl)-inden-4yl]-
III-13
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[3,4-dihydro-6-(1-methylethyl)-inden-4yl]-pyran-2-yl]-
III-13
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(3,4-dihydro-4-methylpyrazin-2-yl)-
1197-09-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
1131-62-0
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-
4478-63-1
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(3,3-dimethyloxiranyl){mesityl oxide epoxide}
III-13, XVII.B-2 III-13, IX.A-22 III-13 H3C
O
III-13, X-2 CO-CH3
H3C
3637-01-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3,4-dimethylphenyl)-
III-13
51863-60-6
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-
117210-50-1
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(3a,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-3a,7,7trimethyl-1H-inden-2-yl)-, (3aR-trans)-
66611-15-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-benzofuranyl)-
22699-70-3
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-ethylphenyl)-
14313-09-8
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-furanyl)-
3420-59-5
III-13, IX.A-22 III-13 III-13, X-2 III-13 III-13, X-2
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxy-2-furanyl)-
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenyl)-
{isomaltol}
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2 III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
6100-74-9
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-
33414-49-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxy-4-methylphenyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
III-13, IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1599
11/24/08 1:56:17 PM
1600
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
121-71-1
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
586-37-8
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-
III-13, X-2
72693-15-3
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-methyl-3H-pyrazol-4-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
72709-76-3
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(3-methyl-3H-pyrazol-4-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
585-74-0
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(3-methylphenyl){3-methylacetophenone}
23787-80-6
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(3-methylpyrazinyl){2-acetyl-3-methylpyrazine}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
III-13 N
CO-CH3
N
CH3
III-13, XVII.B-2
350-03-8
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(3-pyridinyl){3-acetylpyridine or methyl 3-pyridyl ketone}
III-13, XVII.B-2
25343-57-1
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[3-(1,4,5,6-tetrahydropyridinyl)]-
III-13, XVII.B-2
27300-27-2
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[3-(3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyridinyl)]-
III-13, XVII.B-2
59576-31-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
37920-25-5
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-butylphenyl)-
1676-63-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-
III-13 III-13, X-2
66309-77-1
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-ethyl-2,3-dimethylphenyl)-
493-33-4
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
III-13
2478-38-8
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
498-02-2
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl){acetovanillone}
III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
99-93-4
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
100-06-1
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
2524-90-5
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-methyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-
{acetanisole}
122-00-9
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(4-methylphenyl){4-methylacetophenone}
III-13, X-2 III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13
59576-26-0
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1122-54-9
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(4-pyridinyl)-
{4-acetylpyridine}
III-13, XVII.B-2
38205-66-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(4-thiazolyl)-
{4-acetylthiazole}
III-13, XVIII.A-1
6982-72-5
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(5-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl){2-acetyl-5-methylpyrrole}
1193-79-9
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(5-methyl-2-furanyl){2-acetyl-5-methylfuran}
42972-46-3
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(5-methyl-3-pyridinyl)-
22047-27-4
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(5-methylpyrazinyl){2-acetyl-5-methylpyrazine}
III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13, X-2 III-13, XVII.B-2 N
H3C
CO-CH3
III-13, XVII.B-2
N
78210-67-0
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(5-propyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
6940-57-4
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(6-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
36357-38-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(6-methyl-3-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
22047-26-3
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(6-methylpyrazinyl){2-acetyl-6-methylpyrazine}
III-13, XVII.B-2
61891-76-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(dihydro-3,4-dimethylpyrrol-2-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
78249-86-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(dimethylpyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
25496-14-4
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(ethylphenyl)-
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1600
11/24/08 1:56:17 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1601
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
25154-45-4
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(furanyl)-
692-73-0
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(hydroxymethylphenyl)-
70587-92-7
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(hydroxyphenyl)-
71278-10-9
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(methyl-2-furanyl)-
74430-25-4
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table III-13, X-2 III-13 III-13, IX.A-22 III-13
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(methylfuranyl)-
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(methylpyridinyl)-
{2 isomers}
III-13, XVII.B-2
III-13
1333-52-4
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-(naphthalenyl){methyl naphthyl ketone}
III-13
25252-64-6
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-
121198-50-3
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-(tetrahydrofuranyl)-
III-13, X-2
13678-73-4
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[1-(2-furanylmethyl)-1H-pyrrol-2-yl]-
III-13, X-2
22583-61-5
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-
III-13
112523-81-6
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[2,3,3a,4,6a,7,8,9,9a,9b-decahydro5,9a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-1Hcyclopent[a]azulen-3-yl]-, [3R(3D,3aD,6aE,7E,9aD,9bE)]-
III-13
152186-01-1
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[2,3,3a,4,6a,7,8,9,9a,9b-decahydro5,9a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-1Hcyclopent[a]azulen-3-yl]-, (3D,3aD,6aE,7E,9aD,9bE)-(r)-
III-13
III-13, X-2
1767-84-6
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-(2-methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-yl)-
III-13
94390-73-5
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-[2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-2,5cyclohexadien-1-yl]-
III-13
1202-08-0
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)phenyl]-
III-13
51297-35-9
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[3-(1-ethyl-2-methylpropyl)oxiranyl]-
III-13
31577-86-3 43219-68-7
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[3-(1-methylethenyl)cyclopentyl]{two isomers}
III-13
120056-06-6
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[3-(decahydro-2-hydroxy-2,5,5,8atetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl) oxiranyl]-, [1S[1D(2S*,3R*),2E,4a
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-[4-(2,6-dimethylpyridinyl)]-
55087-82-6
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-[5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furanyl]-
52812-41-6
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-6,8dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-7-yl]-
III-13, X-2
57934-85-7
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-[5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-6,8dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-7-yl]-, (exo,exo)-(±)-
III-13, X-2
123695-66-9
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-[6-hydroxy-6-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)2-cyclohexen-1-yl]-
823-76-7
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-cyclohexyl-
57276-33-2
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1-cyclopropyl-2-(3-pyridinyl)-
III-13, X-2
III-13, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, III-13
II.A-5, III-13 III-13 III-13, XVII.B-2
98-86-2
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-phenyl-
2243-35-8
0
1
0
Ethanone, 1-phenyl-2-(acetyloxy)-
{acetophenone}
III-13
22047-25-2
1
1
1
Ethanone, 1-pyrazinyl-
{acetylpyrazine}
III-13, XVII.B-2
574-06-1
1
0
0
Ethanone, 1,2-diphenyl-2-(acetyloxy){benzoin acetate}
III-13, V-3
593-67-9
1
0
0
Ethenamine
III-13
H2C=CH-NH2
XII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1601
11/24/08 1:56:18 PM
1602
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
74-85-1
1
1
1
Ethene
75-01-4
0
1
0
Ethene, chloro-
{vinyl chloride}
79-38-9
1
1
1
Ethene, chlorotrifluoro-
79-35-6
1
1
1
0
1
0
Ethene, 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(3,5dihydroxyphenyl){resveratrol}
IX.A-22
102-61-4
0
1
0
Ethene, 1-(phenyl)-2-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl){pinosylvin}
IX.A-22
127-18-4
1
0
0
Ethene, tetrachloro-
Cl2C=CCl2
XVIII.B-3
79-01-6
1
0
0
Ethene, trichloro-
Cl2C=CHCl
XVIII.B-3
Name (per CA Collective Index) {ethylene}
Selected structures H2C=CH2
Chapter Table I.B-1, XXI-3
H2C=CH-Cl
XVIII.B-3
{Freon® 1113}
ClFC=CF2
XVIII.B-3
Ethene, 1,1-dichloro-2,2-difluoro- {Freon® 1112a}
Cl2C=CF2
XVIII.B-3
463-51-4
1
0
0
Ethenone
2154-50-9
1
0
0
Ethoxyl radical
{ketene} {acetylene}
H2C=CO
III-13
OCH2CH3
XXVII-1
74-86-2
1
0
0
Ethyne
HCŁCH
I.B-1
7440-53-1
1
1
1
Europium
Eu
XX-5
378750-46-0
1
1
1
Europium, isotope of mass 152
152
9040-09-9
0
1
0
Ferredoxins
29732-48-7
0
1
0
Flavylium, 3-[[O-(6-deoxymannosyl)-Dglucosyl]oxy]-3',4',5,5',7-pentahydroxy-, chloride
0
1
0
Flavylium, 3-[[O-(6-deoxymannosyl)-Dglucosyl]oxy]-3',4',5,7-tetrahydroxy-, chloride
1
0
0
Fluoraninene, ethylmethyl-
2693-46-1
1
0
0
3-Fluoranthenamine
206-44-0
1
1
1
Fluoranthene
Eu
XX-5 XXII-2 II.A-5, XVIII.B-3 II.A-5, IIIXVIII.B-3 I.E-6 XII-2 1
I.E-6
2
10
3
9 8
4 7 6
5
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, alkyl-
I.E-6
41593-24-2
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, dihydro-
I.E-6
71278-25-6
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, dihydromethyl-
I.E-6
60826-74-6
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, dimethyl{at least 4 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
25889-63-8
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, 8,9-dimethyl-
I.E-6
55220-72-9
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, ethyl-
I.E-6
71277-96-8
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
71277-97-9
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, hexamethyl-
I.E-6
30997-39-8
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, methyl-
I.E-6
25889-60-5
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
33543-31-6
1
1
1
Fluoranthene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
1706-01-0
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
23339-05-1
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, 7-methyl-
I.E-6
20485-57-8
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, 8-methyl-
I.E-6
71277-98-0
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, pentamethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1602
11/24/08 1:56:18 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1603
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
55220-69-4
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, propyl-
I.E-6
71277-99-1
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, tetramethyl-
I.E-6
41637-87-0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Fluoranthene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Fluorenamine
XII-2
64294-96-8
1
0
0
9H-Fluorenamine
XII-2
6344-63-4
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-1-amine
XII-2
153-78-6
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-2-amine
XII-2
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-4-amine
XII-2
525-03-1
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-9-amine
86-73-7
1
1
1
9H-Fluorene
XII-2 9
8
I.E-6
1
7
2 6
30582-01-5
5
3
4
1
1
1
9H-Fluorene, dimethyl{at least 5 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, ?,9-dimethyl-
I.E-6
17057-98-6
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 1,9-dimethyl-
I.E-6
4612-63-9
1
1
1
9H-Fluorene, 2,3-dimethyl-
I.E-6
4569-45-3
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 9,9-dimethyl-
I.E-6
71278-00-7
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, dimethylethyl-
I.E-6
65319-49-5
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, ethyl-
1207-20-1
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 2-ethyl-
I.E-6
{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
2294-82-8
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 9-ethyl-
I.E-6
71278-01-8
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, ethylmethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
26914-17-0
1
1
1
9H-Fluorene, methyl-
I.E-6
1730-37-6
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
1430-97-3
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
2523-39-9
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
1556-99-6
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 4-methyl-
I.E-6
2523-37-7
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 9-methyl-
I.E-6
4425-82-5
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, 9-methylene-
I.E-6
63372-50-9
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, tetramethyl-
I.E-6
30582-02-6
1
0
0
9H-Fluorene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
6276-03-5
1
1
1
9H-Fluorene-1-carboxylic acid
27134-14-1
1
0
0
Fluoren-9-one, ethyl-
27134-15-2
1
0
0
Fluoren-9-one, ethylmethyl-
486-25-9
1
1
1
9H-Fluoren-9-one
IV.A-3 III-13 III-13 8 7
1 9
2 3
6 5
27134-13-0 5501-37-1
III-13
O
4
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-9-one, dimethyl {5 isomers detected}
III-13
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-9-one, methyl- {2 isomers detected}
III-13
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-9-one, 1-methyl-
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1603
11/24/08 1:56:19 PM
1604
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
2840-51-9
1
1
1
9H-Fluoren-9-one, 2-methyl-
III-13
1705-89-1
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-9-one, 3-methyl-
III-13
Name (per CA Collective Index)
4269-05-0
1
0
0
9H-Fluoren-9-one, 4-methyl-
16984-48-8
1
0
0
Fluoride
Selected structures
Chapter Table
III-13 -1
F
XVIII.B-3, XX-5 XVIII.B-3, XX-5
7782-41-4
1
1
1
Fluorine
F2
50-00-0
1
1
1
Formaldehyde
H-CH=O
III-12
75-12-7
1
0
0
Formamide
H-CO-NH2
XIII-1
871-71-6
1
0
0
Formamide, N-butyl-
H-CO-NH-(CH2)3-CH3
XIII-1
H-CO-N=(CH3)2
68-12-2
1
1
1
Formamide, N,N-dimethyl-
72693-10-8
1
0
0
Formamide, N-(2-furanylmethyl)-
123-39-7
1
0
0
Formamide, N-methyl-
10285-87-7
1
0
0
Formamide, N-(3-methylbutyl)-
2591-79-9
1
0
0
Formamide, N-pentyl-
XIII-1 X-2, XIII-1
H-CO-NH-CH3
XIII-1
H-CO-NH-(CH2)4-CH3
XIII-1
XIII-1
103-70-8
1
0
0
Formamide, N-phenyl-
XIII-1
6343-54-0
1
0
0
Formamide, N-(phenylmethyl)-
XIII-1
56625-04-8
1
0
0
Formamide, N-(3-pyridinylmethyl)-
1
0
0
Formate
XIII-3, XVII.B-2 XX-6
64-18-6
1
1
1
Formic acid
105-86-2
0
1
0
Formic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadien-1-yl ester
109-94-4
1
0
0
Formic acid, ethyl ester
33467-73-1
0
1
0
Formic acid, 3-hexenyl ester
629-33-4
0
1
0
Formic acid, hexyl ester
107-31-3
H-COOH
IV.A-3 V-3
H-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3 V-3
H-COO-(CH2)5-CH3 {methyl formate}
H-COO-CH 3
V-3
1
1
1
Formic acid, methyl ester
0
1
0
Formic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester
V-3
625-55-8
1
0
0
Formic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
H-COO-CH=(CH3)2
V-3
638-49-3
0
1
0
Formic acid, pentyl ester
H-COO-(CH2)4-CH3
V-3
104-62-1
0
1
0
Formic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester
H-COO-(CH2)2-C6H5
V-3
104-57-4
0
1
0
Formic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl formate}
H-COO-CH 2-C6H5
V-3
HC(O)O
V-3
1
0
0
Formyl radical
9037-90-5
0
1
0
D-Fructan
10247-46-8
0
1
0
D-Fructofuranose
71385-82-5
0
1
0
E-D-Fructofuranose, 1-deoxy-1-[2-(3-pyridinyl)-1pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
79082-92-1
0
1
0
E-D-Fructofuranose, 2,6-bis(dihydrogen phosphate)
9001-57-4
0
1
0
E-Fructofuranosidase
79886-47-8
0
1
0
E-D-Fructopyranose, 1-deoxy-1-[2-(3-pyridinyl)-1pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
57-48-7
1
1
1
D-Fructose
XXVII-1 II.A-5, VIII-3 II.A-5, VIII-3 II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.B-4 II.A-5, VIII-3 XXII-2 VIII-3, XVII.B-4
{levulose}
OH O
CH2OH
II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2
OH
OH OH
51767-72-7
0
1
0
13
D-Fructose, labeled with C
3
{D-Fructose- C}
II.A-5, VIII-3, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1604
11/24/08 1:56:19 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1605
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
29118-61-4
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 1-(2-carboxy-1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-deoxy-, (S)-
488-69-7
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 1,6-bis(dihydrogen phosphate)
70954-04-0
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 1-[(1-carboxy-2-hydroxypropyl)amino]1-deoxy-, [R-(R*,S*)]-
VIII-3
34393-27-6
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 1-[(3-amino-1-carboxy-3oxopropyl)amino]-1-deoxy-, (S)-
VIII-3
10003-63-1
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 1-[(3-carboxypropyl)amino]-1-deoxy-
70906-15-9
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 1-deoxy-1-[2-(3-pyridinyl)-1pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
643-13-0
0
1
0
D-Fructose, 6-(dihydrogen phosphate)
VIII-3
36119-15-0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.A-4 II.A-5, VIII-3
VIII-3 II.A-5, VIII-3, XVII.B-4
0
1
0
D-Fructose, mono(dihydrogen phosphate)
VIII-3
0
1
0
Fructosidase
XXII-2
9033-47-0
0
1
0
ȕ-Fructosidase
XXII-2
2438-80-4
0
1
0
Fucose
VIII-3
110-00-9
1
0
0
Furan
X-2 O
0 64079-00-1
1
0
Furan, C3-alkyl-
{3 isomers detected}
0
1
0
Furan, butyl-
0
1
0
Furan, 2,3-diacetyl-5-methyl-
X-2 X-2 O
H3C 4
2
CO-CH3
X-2
3
CO-CH3
28802-49-5
1
0
0
Furan, dimethyl-
X-2
27252-25-1
0
1
0
Furan, ethyl-
X-2
1
0
0
Furan, ethenyl-methyl-
X-2
1
0
0
Furan, hexenyl-methyl-
X-2
27137-41-3
1
0
0
Furan, methyl-
X-2
64079-01-2
0
1
0
Furan, pentyl-
X-2
27252-26-2
0
1
0
Furan, propyl-
X-2
109-99-9
1
1
1
Furan, tetrahydro-
X-2
0
1
0
Furan, tetrahydro-2-methyl-2-(4-hydroxy-1pentenyl)-
II.A-5, X-2
OH O
CH3
0
1
0
Furan, tetrahydro-2-(3-phenylpropyl)-
X-2
13678-51-8
1
0
0
Furan, 2-(2-furanylmethyl)-5-methyl-
X-2
10504-11-7
1
0
0
Furan, 2-(2-methyl-1-propenyl)-
X-2
4868-20-6
1
0
0
Furan, 2-(3-hexenyl)-5-methyl-, (Z)-
X-2
1197-40-6
1
0
0
Furan, 2,2'-methylenebis-
X-2
110484-93-0
1
0
0
Furan, 2,2'-methylenebis[5-ethyl-
X-2
13679-43-1
1
0
0
Furan, 2,2'-methylenebis[5-methyl-
X-2
121213-25-0
1
0
0
Furan, 2,3-dihydro-2-methoxy-
X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1605
11/24/08 1:56:19 PM
1606
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
34314-83-5
1
0
0
Furan, 2,3-dihydro-4-methyl-
X-2
14920-89-9
1
0
0
Furan, 2,3-dimethyl-
X-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1708-29-8
1
0
0
Furan, 2,5-dihydro-
X-2
13314-90-4
1
0
0
Furan, 2,5-dihydro-2,5-bis(methylene)-
X-2
13436-43-6
1
0
0
Furan, 2,5-dihydro-2-methoxy-
X-2
1708-30-1
1
0
0
Furan, 2,5-dihydro-2-methyl-
X-2
0
1
0
Furan, 2,5-diethyl-
X-2
625-86-5
1
1
1
Furan, 2,5-dimethyl-
X-2
110484-94-1
1
0
0
Furan, 2-[1-(5-ethyl-2-furanyl)ethyl]-5-methyl-
X-2
4466-24-4
1
1
1
Furan, 2-butyl-
X-2
1487-18-9
1
1
1
Furan, 2-ethenyl-
X-2
1
0
0
Furan, 2-ethenyl-5-methyl-
X-2
13679-86-2
0
1
0
Furan, 2-ethenyltetrahydro-2-methyl-5-(1methylethenyl)-
X-2
3208-16-0
1
1
1
Furan, 2-ethyl-
X-2
1703-52-2
1
0
0
Furan, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
X-2
534-22-5
1
1
1
Furan, 2-methyl-
X-2
0
1
0
Furan, 2-methyl-5 (1-methylethenyl)-
X-2
96-47-9
1
0
0
Furan, 2-methyltetrahydro-
X-2
3777-69-3
0
1
0
Furan, 2-pentyl-
X-2
17113-33-6
1
0
0
Furan, 2-phenyl-
X-2
55484-04-3
1
0
0
Furan, 2-(4-pyridyl)-
42933-00-6 54869-11-3
1
1
1
Furan, 3-(4,8,12-trimethyltridecyl)-
X-2, XVII.B-2 {phytofuran}
X-2
930-27-8
1
1
1
Furan, 3-methyl-
X-2
13679-41-9
0
1
0
Furan, 3-phenyl-
X-2
2745-26-8
1
0
0
2-Furanacetic acid
IV.A-3, X-2
617-90-3
1
0
0
2-Furancarbonitrile
X-2, XI-2
13714-86-8
1
0
0
2-Furancarbonitrile, 5-methyl-
X-2, XI-2
39276-09-0
1
0
0
Furancarboxaldehyde
98-01-1
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxaldehyde {furfural; 2-furaldehyde}
III-12 X-2 4
III-12 X-2
3
5 O
CHO
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-12, X-2
25376-49-2
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, (hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, III-12, X-2
26895-04-5
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, methyl-
33342-48-2
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 3-methyl-
III-12, X-2
32529-53-6
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-acetyl-
III-12, X-2
10551-58-3
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-
67-47-0
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl)-
21300-07-2
III-12, X-2
III-12, V-3, X-2 II.A-5, III-12, X-2
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methoxy-
III-12 X-2
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methoxy-?-methyl-
III-12 X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1606
11/24/08 1:56:20 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1607
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1917-64-2
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(methoxymethyl)-
620-02-0
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-methyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table III-12 X-2 III-12, X-2
498-60-2
1
1
1
3-Furancarboxaldehyde
III-12, X-2
29988-76-9
1
1
1
Furancarboxamide
X-2, XIII-1
609-38-1
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxamide
X-2, XIII-1
26447-28-9
1
1
1
Furancarboxylic acid
IV.A-4, X-2
88-14-2
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxylic acid
61892-61-3
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxylic acid, 2-(acetyloxy)ethyl ester
{furoic acid}
IV.A-4, X-2 V-3, X-2
614-99-3
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxylic acid, ethyl ester {ethyl 2-furoate}
V-3, X-2
71278-16-5
0
1
0
2-Furancarboxylic acid, 3-hydroxy-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
6338-41-6
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxylic acid, 5-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
1917-15-3
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxylic acid, 5-methyl-
611-13-2
1
1
1
2-Furancarboxylic acid, methyl ester {methyl 2-furoate}
V-3, X-2
3885-29-8
1
0
0
2-Furancarboxylic acid, tetrahydro-5-oxo-, methyl ester
V-3, VI-3, X-2
488-93-7
1
0
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid
6947-94-0
1
0
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid, 2-methyl-
IV.A-4, X-2
636-44-2
1
0
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid, 2,5-dimethyl-
IV.A-4, X-2
IV.A-4, X-2
IV.A-4, X-2
4412-96-8
1
0
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid, 3-methyl-
IV.A-4, X-2
21984-93-0
1
0
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid, 5-methyl-
IV.A-4, X-2
13129-23-2
0
1
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid, methyl ester
5204-91-1
1
0
0
3-Furancarboxylic acid, tetrahydro-5-oxo-, methyl ester
823-82-5
1
1
1
2,5-Furandicarboxaldehyde
61892-94-2
1
0
0
3,4-Furandiol, tetrahydro-3-methyl-
108-31-6
1
1
1
2,5-Furandione
V-3, X-2 V-3, VI-3, X-2 III-12, X-2 X-2
{maleic anhydride}
3 O
33765-37-6
0
1
0
2,5-Furandione, 3,4-diethyldihydro-, (E)-
1 O
5
o
VII-1
108-30-5
1
1
1
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-
17347-61-4
1
1
1
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-
VII-1
7475-92-5
1
1
1
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-3,4-dimethyl{pyrocinchonic anhydride}
VII-1
4100-80-5
1
0
0
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-3-methyl-
VII-1
766-39-2
1
1
1
2,5-Furandione, 3,4-dimethyl-
VII-1
3552-33-8
1
1
1
2,5-Furandione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
VII-1
616-02-4
1
0
0
2,5-Furandione, 3-methyl-
VII-1
72693-16-4
1
0
0
2,5-Furandione, 3-methyl-4-(phenylmethyl)-
VII-1
16493-20-2
1
0
0
2,5-Furandione, 3-methyl-4-propyl-
VII-1
61679-89-8
1
0
0
2,5-Furandione, 3-propyl-
98-02-2
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanethiol
40795-25-3
1
0
0
Furanmethanol
{succinic anhydride}
2
VII-1
4
VII-1
VII-1 X-2, XVIII.A-1 II.A-5, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1607
11/24/08 1:56:20 PM
1608
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
98-00-0
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) 2-Furanmethanol
Selected structures
5
II.A-5, X-2
3
4
{furfuryl alcohol}
2
CH2OH
1
O
623-17-6
1
1
1
2-Furanmethanol, acetate
Chapter Table
V-3, X-2
1
0
0
2-Furanmethanol, 2,3-dihydro-5-methoxy-
II.A-5, X-2
60047-17-8
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanol, 5-ethenyltetrahydro-D,D,5trimethyl-
II.A-5, X-2
5989-33-3
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanol, 5-ethenyltetrahydro-D,D,5trimethyl-, (Z){cis-linalool oxide}
II.A-5, X-2
23007-29-6
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanol, 5-ethenyltetrahydro-D,D,5trimethyl-, (E){trans-linalool oxide}
II.A-5, X-2
13493-97-5
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanol, formate
V-3, X-2
55664-77-2
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanol, methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
3857-25-8
1
1
1
2-Furanmethanol, 5-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
54774-28-6
0
1
0
2-Furanmethanol, 5-methyltetrahydro-
II.A-5, X-2
61481-02-5
1
0
0
2-Furanmethanol, 5-(1-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-
97-99-4
1
1
1
2-Furanmethanol, tetrahydro-
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, X-2
4412-91-3
1
0
0
3-Furanmethanol
29848-46-2
1
0
0
3-Furanol, tetrahydro-5,5-dimethyl-
66607-70-3
0
1
0
3-Furanol, tetrahydro-5-[6-hydroxy-3-(1methylethyl)-1-heptenyl]-5-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2, XVII.A-4
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, X-2
OH OH
CH3 O
CH3 H3C
20825-71-2
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone
{butenolide}
5 4
517-23-7
CH3
VI-3
1 O O 3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, acetyl-
III-13, VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-acetyldihydro-
III-13, VI-3
7400-67-1
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 4-acetyldihydro-
III-13, VI-3
29393-32-6
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-acetyldihydro-
III-13, VI-3
19405-99-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-(acetyloxy)dihydro-
V-3, VI-3
19405-98-2
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 4-(acetyloxy)dihydro-
V-3, VI-3
26817-24-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-(acetyloxy)dihydro-
V-3, VI-3
61892-43-1
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-(acetyloxy)dihydro-4-hydroxy-
II.A-5, V-3, VI-3
61892-44-2
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-(acetyloxy)dihydro-4-hydroxy-
II.A-5, V-3, VI-3
160115-54-8
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-(acetyloxy)dihydro-5-methyl-5[3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-1-heptenyl]-, [3R[3D,5E(1E,3S*)]]-
III-13, V-3, VI-3
160224-93-1
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-(acetyloxy)dihydro-5-methyl-5[3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-1-heptenyl]-, [3R[3D,5D(1E,3S*)]]-
III-13, V-3, VI-3
1192-20-7
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-aminodihydro-
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-(3-butenyl)-dihydro-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-butyldihydro-
VI-3
104-50-7
VI-3, XII-2 {J-octalactone}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1608
11/24/08 1:56:21 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1609
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
CAS No.
S 0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-butyldihydro-4-methyl-
VI-3
96-48-0
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-
VI-3
13092-55-2
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3
17675-99-9
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-, (Z)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-5(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
61892-57-7
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-5(hydroxymethyl)-4-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
18465-71-9
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-3-methyl-, (3R-Z)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dihydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
72693-07-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4-dimethyl-
VI-3
5145-01-7
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
13861-97-7
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-
VI-3
6971-63-7
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
3123-97-5
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
38273-97-1
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-(2oxopropyl)-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1,4-dimethyl-1pentenyl)-
VI-3
1073-11-6
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-ethenyl-5-methyl-
VI-3
16496-51-8
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-ethyl-
VI-3
695-06-7
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-ethyl- {J-hexalactone}
VI-3
2610-98-2
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-ethyl-3-methyl-
VI-3
{butyrolactone}
2865-82-9
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-ethyl-5-methyl-
VI-3
158815-74-8
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(3-ethyl-4-methyl-1pentenyl)-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-
VI-3
61892-46-4
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-ethynyl-5-hydroxy-3methyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(5-heptenyl)-
VI-3
104-67-6
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-heptyl{J-undecalactone}
VI-3
706-14-9
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-hexyl-
VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro(hydroxy)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
18132-98-4
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1608-63-5
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-(1-methylethyl)-
60016-73-1
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-(2-oxopropyl)-
25600-22-0
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-(1-oxopropoxy)-
{J-decalactone}
VI-3 III-13, VI-3 OOC-CH2CH3 4 5
V-3, VI-3
3 1
O
2
O
71385-84-7
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-(2-oxopropyl)-
III-13, VI-3
65331-00-2
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-(2-oxopropyl)-
III-13, VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1609
11/24/08 1:56:21 PM
1610
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
61892-49-7
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1-oxopropyl)-
III-13, VI-3
53155-68-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3,4,5-trimethyl-, (3D,4D,5D)-
VI-3
19444-84-9
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3
19444-86-1
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-3(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1192-42-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
6969-43-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4,5-trimethyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
52126-90-6
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
599-04-2
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethyl-, (R)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-5-(1hydroxyethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
61892-52-2
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-5-(2hydroxyethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
61892-50-0
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-5-(2hydroxyethyl)-5-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
53561-62-9
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-5-methyl{2 isomers}
II.A-5, VI-3
158815-71-5
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-5-[3(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-1-heptenyl]-, [3R[3D,5E(1E,3S*)]]-
5469-16-9
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3
3285-47-0
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-hydroxy-3,3-dimethyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
61892-45-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-hydroxy-3(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
36679-81-9
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
34945-05-6
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-(2,5,6-trimethyl-5,6epoxyoctanyl)-
50768-69-9
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3
27610-27-1
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1-hydroxyethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
61892-47-5
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-hydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
10374-51-3
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
1679-47-6
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-3-methyl-
VI-3
1679-49-8
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-methyl-
VI-3
108-29-2
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl{J-valerolactone}
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-(3-methyl-1butenyl)-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-(3-oxobutyl)-
III-13, VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(3-methyl-1-butenyl)-
80797-69-9
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, III-13, VI-3
VI-3, X-2
VI-3
2429-94-9
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(3-methylbutyl)-
VI-3
10547-88-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
38624-29-2
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1610
11/24/08 1:56:21 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1611
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1-methylethyl)-5-(3methyl-1,2-butadienyl)-
VI-3
129742-48-9
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1-methylethyl)-5-(3oxo-1-butenyl)-, (E)-(+)-
III-13, VI-3
2305-05-7
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-octyl{J-dodecalactone}
VI-3
76710-90-2
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(2-pentenyl)-, (Z)-
VI-3
104-61-0
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-pentyl{J-nonalactone}
VI-3
105-21-5
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-propyl{J-heptalactone}
VI-3
20971-79-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(3-pyridinyl)-
61892-55-5
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(hydroxymethyl)-4methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
72507-34-7
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-[1-methyl-4-(1methylethyl)-7-oxo-2-octenyl]-
III-13, VI-3
102734-52-1
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-[4-hydroxy-4-methyl-7(1-methylethyl)-10-oxo-1,5-undecadienyl]-5methyl-, [5S-[5R*(1E,4R*,5E,7R*)]]-
CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
VI-3, XVII.B-2
II.A-5, III-13, VI-3 H3C
CH3 OH
O
CH3
CH3 O
CH3
O
102734-53-2
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-[4-hydroxy-4-methyl-7(1-methylethyl)-10-oxo-1,5-undecadienyl]-5methyl-, [5S-[5R*(1E,4S*,5E,7R*)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, VI-3
102734-54-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-[4-hydroxy-4-methyl-7(1-methylethyl)-10-oxo-1,5-undecadienyl]-5methyl-, [5R-[5R*(1E,4S*,5E,7S*)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, VI-3
102734-55-4
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-[4-hydroxy-4-methyl-7(1-methylethyl)-10-oxo-1,5-undecadienyl]-5methyl-, [5R-[5R*(1E,4R*,5E,7S*)]]-
II.A-5, III-13, VI-3
80744-25-8
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-[4-hydroxy-4-methyl-7(1-methylethyl)-10-oxo-1,5-undecadienyl]-5methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-(5-methyl-2furanyl)-
60646-31-3
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, (S)-
57213-51-1
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-[3-(1methylethyl)-6-oxo-1-heptenyl]-
VI-3, X-2 VI-3 III-13, VI-3 O
CH3
H3C
H3C
O
O
CH3
3284-93-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-propyl-
VI-3
10008-73-8
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methylene-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-(1,1,3-trimethyl-2butenyl)-
VI-3
64291-81-2
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, dihydrodimethyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3,3-dimethyl-
VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1611
11/24/08 1:56:22 PM
1612
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-
61892-58-8
1
0
0
2(3H)-Furanone, 3-(hydroxymethyl)-5-methyl-
591-12-8
1
1
1
2(3H)-Furanone, 5-methyl-
Selected structures
Chapter Table VI-3 II.A-5, VI-3 VI-3
{4-hydroxy-3-pentenoic acid lactone; D-angelica lactone} 497-23-4
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone
{crotonolactone}
5 4
VI-3
1 O O 3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, acetyl-
III-13, VI-3
80436-91-5
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-acetyl-
III-13, VI-3
38260-27-4
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-acetyl-
III-13, VI-3
61892-53-3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-acetyl-
III-13, VI-3 III-13, VI-3
61892-42-0 14668-67-8 1575-46-8
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-acetyl-4-methyl-
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-butylidene-
VI-3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,5-diethyl-
VI-3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dihydroxy-
VI-3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-
VI-3
5584-69-0
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
10547-85-0
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 4,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
20019-64-1 6067-11-4
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5,5-dimethyl-4-ethyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-5-hydroxy-5-pentyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
OH
O
O
14300-74-4
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-5-methylene-
VI-3
10547-84-9
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-5-pentyl{dihydrobovolide}
VI-3 O
774-64-1
1
1
1
O
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-5-pentylidene{bovolide}
VI-3 O
O
7935-59-1
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-5-pentylidene-, dihydro derivative
VI-3
66309-74-8
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4-dimethyl-5-(1-propenyl)-
VI-3
66309-75-9
2407-43-4
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethenyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethenyl-3-methyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-ethyl-
VI-3
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethyl-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-ethyl-5,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
698-10-2
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethyl-3-hydroxy-4-methyl-
VI-3
14668-66-7
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-ethyl-5-methyl-
VI-3
54467-53-7
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-ethyl-5-methyl-
VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1612
11/24/08 1:56:22 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1613
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
26329-68-0
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethyl-3-methyl-
VI-3
52945-87-6
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethyl-4-methyl-
VI-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
6066-62-2
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethylidene-3,4-dimethyl-
VI-3
71126-48-2
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-ethylidene-3-methyl-, (Z)-
VI-3
28664-35-9 54621-96-4
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-hydroxy-5-(1-hydroxyethyl)-
IVI-3
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-(1-hydroxyethyl)-, [R-(R*,S*)]-
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3 VI-3
80904-75-2
1
0
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, VI-3
22122-36-7
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-methyl-
VI-3
6124-79-4
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-methyl-
VI-3
591-11-7
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-methyl-
{ȕ-angelica lactone}
VI-3
108-28-1
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-methylene- {protoanemonin}
VI-3
7754-93-0
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
10547-89-4
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
61892-54-4
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 3-methyl-5-methylene-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-methyl-5-(3-oxobutyl)
III-13, VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-methyl-4-(3-oxo-4-methylpentyl)-
III-13, VI-3
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4-(4-methyl-1-pentyl)-
VI-3
77267-30-2
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-(2-pentenyl)-, (Z)-
VI-3
1963-26-8 21963-26-8
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 5-pentyl-
VI-3
33488-51-6
1
1
1
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,4,5-trimethyl-
VI-3
50598-50-0
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 3,5,5-trimethyl-
VI-3
4182-41-6
0
1
0
2(5H)-Furanone, 4,5,5-trimethyl-
3511-31-7
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone
22929-52-8
3188-00-9
VI-3 III-13, X-2
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone, dihydro-
III-13, X-2
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone, dihydro-2,5-dimethyl-, (E)-
III-13, X-2
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone, dihydro-2,5-dimethyl-, (Z)-
III-13, X-2
1
1
1
3(2H)-Furanone, dihydro-2-methyl{2-methyltetrahydrofuran-3-one}
III-13, X-2 O
O CH3
89364-27-2
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-methyl-
III-13, X-2
0
1
0
3(2H)-Furanone, dihydro-5-methyl-5-propyl-
III-13, X-2
14400-67-0
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone, 2,5-dimethyl-
III-13, X-2
27538-09-6
0
1
0
3(2H)-Furanone, 3-ethyl-4-hydroxy-5-methyl-
III-13, X-2
17678-20-5
1
0
0
3(2H)-Furanone, 4-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-5methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
3658-77-3
1
1
1
3(2H)-Furanone, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl{furaneol}
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
484-20-8
0
1
0
7H-Furo[3,2-g][1]benzopyran-7-one, 4-methoxy-
X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1613
11/24/08 1:56:23 PM
1614
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Furo[3,2-b]furan, tetrahydro-2-acetyl-3a-methyl-5(1-methylethyl)-
Chapter Table
Selected structures
III-13, X-2 H3 C CO-CH3 O
H3C
O CH3
0
1
0
Furo[3,2-b]furan-2(3H)-methanol, tetrahydro-Į,Į,3atrimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 H3C
CH3 OH O
H3C
CH3
O CH3
60026-27-9
0
1
0
Furo[3,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one, tetrahydro-3a-methyl-
VI-3, X-2
O O
O CH3
0
1
0
Furo[3,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one, tetrahydro-3a-methyl-5(1-methylethenyl)-
VI-3, X-2
H2C O O
H3C
O CH3
0
1
0
Furo[3,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one, tetrahydro-3a-methyl-5(1-methylethenyl)-
VI-3, X-2
H2C O H3C
O
O CH3
0
1
0
Furo[3,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one, tetrahydro-3a-methyl-5(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3, X-2
H3C O O
H3C
O CH3
0
1
0
Furo[3,2-b]furan-2(3H)-one, tetrahydro-3a-methyl-5(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3, X-2
H3C O O
H3C
O CH3
61893-05-8
1
0
0
1H-Furo[2,3-d]imidazole, 2-methyl-
X-2, XVII.A-4
H N CH3 O
N
72686-97-6
0
1
0
2H-Furo[3,2-c]isobenzofuran-8-methanol, octahydro-2-methoxy-D,D,3a,5a-tetramethyl-, (2D,3aD,5aE,8E,9aS*)-
II.A-5, X-2
72747-21-8
0
1
0
2H-Furo[3,2-c]isobenzofuran-8-methanol, octahydro-2-methoxy-D,D,3a,5a-tetramethyl-, [2R(2D,3aE,5aD,8D,9aR*)]-
II.A-5, X-2
37209-50-0
0
1
0
3aH-Furo[3,2-c]isobenzofuran-8-methanol, 5,5a,6,7,8,9-hexahydro-D,D,3a,5a-tetramethyl-, acetate, [3aR-(3aD,5aE,8E,9aR*)]-
II.A-5, X-2
56857-64-8
0
1
0
3aH-Furo[3,2-c]isobenzofuran-8-methanol, 5,5a,6,7,8,9-hexahydro-D,D,3a,5a-tetramethyl-, [3aR-(3aD,5aE,8E,9aR*)]-
II.A-5, X-2
7440-54-2
1
1
1
Gadolinium
9037-55-2
1
1
1
D-Galactan
526-99-8
Gd
XX-5 VIII-3
0
1
0
Galactaric acid
HOOC-(CHOH)4-COOH
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,3-di-O-methyl-
HOH2C-[CH(OCH3]2-(CHOH)2-CH2OH II.A-5
IV.A-3
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,4-di-O-methyl-
II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1614
11/24/08 1:56:23 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1615
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,6-di-O-methyl-
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
HOH2C-CH(OCH3)-(CHOH)3-CH2OCH3 II.A-5
0
1
0
Galactitol, 3-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,3,6-tri-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Galactitol, 2,4,6-tri-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
9036-66-2
1
1
1
D-Galacto-L-arabinan
II.A-5, X-2
33818-21-2
1
0
0
D-D-Galactofuranose, 1,6-anhydro-
II.A-5, X-2
9040-29-3
0
1
0
D-Galacto-D-gluco-D-mannan
II.A-5, X-2
644-76-8
1
0
0
E-D-Galactopyranose, 1,6-anhydro-
II.A-5, X-2
26656-33-7
0
1
0
D-Galactopyranuronic acid, homopolymer
1948-54-5
0
1
0
Galactose, 2-amino-2-deoxy-
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
35381-83-0
0
1
0
Galactose, diether with 1,2,3-propanetriol (1:2)
II.A-5, X-2
59-23-4
1
1
1
D-Galactose
II.A-5, X-2
7535-00-4
0
1
0
D-Galactose, 2-amino-2-deoxy-
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
{galactosamine}
1949-89-9
0
1
0
D-Galactose, 2-deoxy-
9001-34-7
0
1
0
Galactosidase
II.A-5, X-2
97234-09-8
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, [(1-oxohexadecatrienyl)oxy][(1oxooctadecatrienyl)oxy]propyl, (all-Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97234-10-1
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, [(1-oxohexadecyl)oxy][(1oxooctadecatrienyl)oxy]propyl, (Z,Z,Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97276-55-6
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, [(1-oxooctadecadienyl)oxy][(1oxooctadecatrienyl)oxy]propyl, (all-Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97232-94-5
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, 2,3-bis[(1oxooctadecadienyl)oxy]propyl O-D-galactosyl-, (all-Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97170-15-5
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, 2,3-bis[(1oxooctadecadienyl)oxy]propyl, (all-Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97233-43-7
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, 2,3-bis[(1oxooctadecatrienyl)oxy]propyl O-D-galactosyl-, (all-Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97170-14-4
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, 2,3-bis[(1oxooctadecatrienyl)oxy]propyl, (all-Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
97275-71-3
0
1
0
D-Galactoside, 2,3-dihydroxypropyl, 2'(or 3')hexadecanoate 3' (or 2')-octadecadienoate, (Z,Z)-
II.A-5, X-2
14982-50-4
0
1
0
Galacturonic acid
XXII-2
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
COOH HO OH
O
OH OH
25990-10-7
0
1
0
Galacturonic acid, homopolymer
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
685-73-4
1
1
1
D-Galacturonic acid
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
34150-36-2
0
1
0
D-Galacturonic acid, anhydro-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1615
11/24/08 1:56:24 PM
1616
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
25249-06-3
0
1
0
D-Galacturonic acid, homopolymer
7440-55-3
1
1
1
Gallium
XX-5
152347-17-6
0
1
0
GenBank D16204
XXII-2
152347-18-7
0
1
0
GenBank D16205
XXII-2
152347-16-5
0
1
0
GenBank D16206
XXII-2
143787-54-6
0
1
0
GenBank L02124
XXII-2
150472-46-1
0
1
0
GenBank L13439
XXII-2
150472-47-2
0
1
0
GenBank L13440
XXII-2
150472-48-3
0
1
0
GenBank L13441
XXII-2
150472-49-4
0
1
0
GenBank L13442
XXII-2
150472-50-7
0
1
0
GenBank L13443
XXII-2
149241-78-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
0
1
0
GenBank L14953
XXII-2
0
1
0
GenBank M73791
XXII-2
144680-39-7
0
1
0
GenBank M74102
XXII-2
144680-37-5
0
1
0
GenBank M74103
XXII-2
142693-30-9
0
1
0
GenBank M84650
XXII-2
145767-36-8
0
1
0
GenBank M87838
XXII-2
145767-40-4
0
1
0
GenBank M87839
XXII-2
141683-31-0
0
1
0
GenBank M94135
XXII-2
0
1
0
GenBank X58527
XXII-2
139854-77-6
0
1
0
GenBank X60057
XXII-2
140352-16-5
0
1
0
GenBank X61113
XXII-2
140352-17-6
0
1
0
GenBank X61114
XXII-2
139857-64-0
0
1
0
GenBank X61750
XXII-2
0
1
0
GenBank X61826
XXII-2
140360-05-0
0
1
0
GenBank X62339
XXII-2
141005-27-8
0
1
0
GenBank X62368
XXII-2
140104-46-7
0
1
0
GenBank X62395
XXII-2
0
1
0
GenBank X62500
XXII-2
142965-21-7
0
1
0
GenBank X63078
XXII-2
145905-43-7
0
1
0
GenBank X63607
XXII-2
139867-08-6
0
1
0
GenBank X64398
XXII-2
139869-01-5
0
1
0
GenBank X64399
XXII-2
140830-68-8
0
1
0
GenBank X64423
XXII-2
0
1
0
GenBank X64621
XXII-2
141164-37-6
0
1
0
GenBank X65117
XXII-2
141164-36-5
0
1
0
GenBank X65118
XXII-2
147904-32-3
0
1
0
GenBank X65982
XXII-2
144031-18-5
0
1
0
GenBank X66145
XXII-2
143341-50-8
0
1
0
GenBank X67158
XXII-2
151468-68-7
0
1
0
GenBank X69971
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1616
11/24/08 1:56:24 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1617
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 148757-17-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
GenBank X71015
XXII-2
0
1
0
GenBank Z11803
XXII-2
142914-46-3
0
1
0
GenBank Z12619
XXII-2
142914-45-2
0
1
0
GenBank Z12623
XXII-2
152651-60-0
0
1
0
GenBank Z14079
XXII-2
152651-59-7
0
1
0
GenBank Z14080
XXII-2
152651-58-6
0
1
0
GenBank Z14081
XXII-2
152651-57-5
0
1
0
GenBank Z14082
XXII-2
152651-61-1
0
1
0
GenBank Z14085
XXII-2
148544-79-0
0
1
0
GenBank Z16403
XXII-2
148544-80-3
0
1
0
GenBank Z16404
XXII-2
554-91-6
0
1
0
Gentiobiose
7440-56-4
1
1
1
Germanium
II.A-5, X-2
19147-78-5
0
1
0
Gibbane-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 2,3-epoxy-4a,7dihydroxy-1-methyl-8-methylene-, 1,4a-lactone, (1D,2E,3E,4aD,4bE,10E)-
II.A-5, VI-3
545-97-1
0
1
0
Gibbane-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 2,4a,7-trihydroxy-1methyl-8-methylene-, 1,4a-lactone, (1D,2E,4aD,4bE,10E)-
II.A-5, VI-3
468-44-0
0
1
0
Gibbane-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 2,4a-dihydroxy-1methyl-8-methylene-,1,4a-lactone, (1D,2E,4aD,4bE,10E)-.
Ge
XX-5
II.A-5, VI-3 COOH
H2C
O
O CH3
OH
561-56-8
0
1
0
Gibb-2-ene-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 4a,7-dihydroxy1-methyl-8-methylene-, 1,4a-lactone, (1D,4aD,4bE,10E)-
77-06-5
0
1
0
Gibb-3-ene-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 2,4a,7trihydroxy-1-methyl-8-methylene-, 1,4a-lactone, (1D,2E,4aD,4bE,10E){gibberellic acid}
II.A-5, VI-3
II.A-5, VI-3 O HO
OH
O
COOH
125-67-7
0
1
0
Gibb-3-ene-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 2,4a,7trihydroxy-1-methyl-8-methylene-, 1,4a-lactone, potassium salt {gibberellic acid, potassium salt}
II.A-5, VI-3, XXI-3 O HO
OH
O
COOH
510-75-8
0
1
0
Gibb-3-ene-1,10-dicarboxylic acid, 2,4a-dihydroxy1-methyl-8-methylene-, 1,4a-lactone, (1D,2E,4aD,4bE,10E)-
II.A-5, VI-3
9007-83-4
0
1
0
Globulins, J-
9037-91-6
0
1
0
Glucan
II.A-5, VIII-3
9051-97-2
0
1
0
E-D-Glucan, (1o3)-
II.A-5, VIII-3
9044-93-3
0
1
0
E-1,3-Glucanase
XXII-2
128512-83-4
0
1
0
Glucanase, endo-1,3-E-(tobacco clone pGL31 isoenzyme)
XXII-2
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1617
11/24/08 1:56:25 PM
1618
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
128512-84-5
0
1
0
Glucanase, endo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pGL36 isoenzyme)
XXII-2
128512-85-6
0
1
0
Glucanase, endo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pGL43 isoenzyme)
XXII-2
128512-86-7
0
1
0
Glucanase, endo-1,3-E- (tobacco isoenzyme)
XXII-2
62213-14-3
0
1
0
Glucanase, endo-1,3(4)-E-
XXII-2
128475-00-3
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.1 isoenzyme signal peptide)
XXII-2
128475-01-4
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.1 isoenzyme signal peptide) 26-Lthreonine-28-L-glutamic acid
XXII-2
128512-87-8
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pBSGlu39.1 isoenzyme protein moiety)
XXII-2
128512-88-9
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pBSGluc39.3 isoenzyme protein moiety)
XXII-2
128512-89-0
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pGL31 isoenzyme protein moiety)
XXII-2
128512-90-3
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pGL36 isoenzyme protein moiety)
XXII-2
128512-91-4
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco clone pGL43 isoenzyme protein moiety)
XXII-2
128512-92-5
0
1
0
Glucanase, preproendo-1,3-E- (tobacco isoenzyme protein moiety)
XXII-2
7425-74-3
1
1
1
E-D-Glucofuranose, 1,6-anhydro-
66537-22-2
1
1
1
Glucometasaccharinic acid, J-lactone
492-62-6
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranose
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, VI-3, X-2 II.A-5, X-2
OH OH
O
HO
HOCH2 OH
492-61-5
28977-67-5
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranose
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Į-D-Glucopyranose, 1-acetate 2,3,4,6-tetrakis((+)-3methylbutanoate)
V-3
1
1
1
E-D-Glucopyranose, 6-acetate 2,3,4-tris((+)-3methylvalerate)
V-3
E-D-Glucopyranose, 6-acetate 2,3,4-tris((+)-3methylpentanoate) 25545-13-5
0
1
0
D-Glucopyranose, 4-(4-hydroxybenzoate)
V-3
23445-11-6
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranose, 1-(2,5-dihydroxybenzoate)
V-3 V-3
41682-52-4
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranose, 1-(3-phenyl-2-propenoate)
59-56-3
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranose, 1-(dihydrogen phosphate)
498-07-7
1
1
1
E-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro- {levoglucosan}
V-3 HO
HO
OH
II.A-5, X-2
O O
61891-55-2
1
0
0
E-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-anhydro-, monoacetate
V-3
10139-18-1
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranose, 1,6-bis(dihydrogen phosphate)
V-3
21056-52-0
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranose, 1-benzoate
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1618
11/24/08 1:56:25 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1619
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
33-99-3
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranose, 4-O-D-D-glucopyranosyl-
II.A-5, X-2
4482-75-1
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranose, 4-O-D-D-glucopyranosyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Į-D-Glucopyranose, 1,2,3,4,5-penta((+)-3methylbutanoate)
V-3
64461-84-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranose, 6-(3-phenyl-2-propenoate)
V-3
0
1
0
Į-D-Glucopyranose, 1,3,4,6-tetrakis((+)-3methylbutanoate)
V-3
0
1
0
Į-D-Glucopyranose, 2,3,4,5-tetrakis((+)-3methylbutanoate)
V-3
0
1
0
ȕ-D-Glucopyranose, 2,3,4,5-tetrakis((+)-3methylbutanoate)
V-3
7724-09-6
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, (2-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-
7073-61-2
1
1
1
E-D-Glucopyranoside, (3E)-cholest-5-en-3-yl{cholesteryl glucoside}
II.A-5, X-2
1
1
1
E-D-Glucopyranoside, (3E)-ergost-5-en-3-yl{campesteryl glucoside}
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 3-hexen-1-yl{3-hexen-1-yl glucoside; leaf acid glucoside}
II.A-5, X-2
1
1
1
E-D-Glucopyranoside, (3E)-stigmast-5-en-3-yl{E-sitosteryl glucoside}
474-58-8
II.A-5, IX.A-22, X-2
II.A-5, X-2 CH3 H3C
C2H5
CH-CH2CH2-CH-CH=(CH3)2
H3C
HOCH2
O
O OH
OH
HO
19716-26-8
1
1
1
E-D-Glucopyranoside, (3E,22E)-stigmasta-5,22dien-3-yl{stigmasteryl glucoside}
CH3
C2H5
II.A-5, X-2
CH-CH=CH-CH-CH=(CH3)2
H3C H3C
HOCH2
O
O
OH OH
HO
51064-38-1
1
1
1
II.A-5, X-2
E-D-Glucopyranoside, (3E,24S)-stigmast-5-en-3-yl{Ȗ-sitosteryl glucoside}
CH3 H 3C
CH-CH2CH2-CH-CH=(CH 3)2 C2H5
H3C
HOCH2
O
O
OH OH
HO
57-50-1
1
1
1
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl{sucrose}
II.A-5, X-2 HOH2C O
HOH2C
HO
O
CH2OH
O OH HO
126-14-7
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-, octaacetate
OH
HO
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1619
11/24/08 1:56:26 PM
1620
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
470-55-3
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-O-D-Dgalactopyranosyl-(1o6)-O-D-D-galactopyranosyl(1o6)-
II.A-5, X-2
512-69-6
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-O-D-Dgalactopyranosyl-(1o6){raffinose}
II.A-5, X-2
13101-54-7
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-O-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-
II.A-5, X-2
25954-44-3
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-O-E-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o6)-
II.A-5, X-2
98913-58-7
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-, 3methylpentanoate
II.A-5, V-3, X-2
154063-13-5
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-, 6acetate 2,3,4-tris(2-methylbutanoate)
II.A-5, V-3, X-2
97614-61-4
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-, 6acetate 2,3,4-tris(3-methylpentanoate)
II.A-5, V-3, X-2
106033-38-9
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-, 6acetate 2,3,4-tris(3-methylpentanoate), [2(S),3(S),4(S)]-
II.A-5, V-3, X-2
41055-68-9
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-, labeled 13 with C
II.A-5, X-2
21291-36-1
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, E-D-fructofuranosyl-O-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o6)-
II.A-5, X-2
88848-61-7
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-3hydroxy-1-methyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-2naphthalenyl 2-O-E-D-glucopyranosyl-, [1S(1D,2E,3D,7E)]-
II.A-5, X-2
99499-89-5
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-3hydroxy-1-methyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-2naphthalenyl O-6-deoxy-D-L-mannopyranosyl(1o4)-O-E-D-glucopyranosyl-(1o4)-, [1S(1D,2E,3D,7E)]-
II.A-5, X-2
138-52-3
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 2-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl-
II.A-5, X-2
136448-99-2
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 2-[5-(acetyloxy)1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-8,8a-dimethyl-2naphthalenyl]-2-hydroxypropyl-, 2,3,4,6tetraacetate, [2R-[2D(S*),5D,8E,8aD]]-
II.A-5, V-3, X-2
75039-16-6
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 2-methyl-4-(1H-purin-6ylamino)-2-butenyl-, mono(dihydrogen phosphate) (ester), (E)-
II.A-5, V-3, X-2
62512-96-3
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 2-methyl-4-(1H-purin-6ylamino)butyl-
78081-83-1
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, 3-(4-hydroxy-2,2,6-trimethyl7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]hept-1-yl)-1-methyl-2-propenyl-
II.A-5, X-2
63648-83-9
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, 3-O-acetyl-E-Dfructofuranosyl-
II.A-5, X-2
470-57-5
0
1
0
D-D-Glucopyranoside, O-D-D-galactopyranosyl(1o6)-E-D-fructofuranosyl{theanderose}
II.A-5, X-2
1464-44-4
0
1
0
E-D-Glucopyranoside, phenyl-
II.A-5, X-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1620
11/24/08 1:56:26 PM
1621
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1405-86-3
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3, X-2
2-O-E-D-Glucopyranuronysyl-D-Dglucopyranosiduronic acid, (3E,20E)-20-carboxy11-oxo-30-norolean-12-en-3-yl{glycyrrhizic acid; glycyrrhizin}
H3C
COOH
O CH3
H3C
CH3
CH3 O HOOC
H3C
O
O OH
HO HO
53596-04-0
0
1
0
2-O-E-D-Glucopyranuronysyl-D-Dglucopyranosiduronic acid, ammoniated (3E,20E)20-carboxy-11-oxo-30-norolean-12-en-3-yl-, ammoniated {glycyrrhizic acid ammoniated; glycyrrhizin ammoniated}
50-99-7 26655-34-5
1
1
1
D-D-Glucose
0
1
0
D-D-Glucose, labeled with C {D-D-Glucose- C}
0
1
0
OH
OH
CH3
O
COOH
X-2
II.A-5, X-2
14
13
Glucose, labeled with C
154-17-6
0
1
0
D-Glucose, 2-deoxy-
3416-24-8
0
1
0
D-Glucose, 2-deoxy-, 2-amino-
14
XXV-29
13
{Glucose- C}
VIII-3
{glucosamine}
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
II.A-5, X-2
1398-61-4
0
1
0
D-Glucose, ȕ-(1,4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-
28905-12-6
1
1
1
E-D-Glucose
9001-22-3
0
1
0
Glucosidase, E-
II.A-5, X-2, XIII-1 II.A-5, X-2 XXII-2
9001-42-7
0
1
0
Glucosidase, D-
XXII-2
9012-47-9
0
1
0
Glucosidase, amylo-1,6-
XXII-2
9031-48-5
0
1
0
Glucosyltransferase
XXII-2
9027-19-4
0
1
0
Glucosyltransferase, uridine diphosphoglucose-1,4E-glucan
XXII-2
50812-18-5
0
1
0
Glucosyltransferase, uridine diphosphoglucoseflavonol 3-O-glucoside
XXII-2
9030-05-1
0
1
0
Glucosyltransferase, uridine diphosphoglucosefructose
XXII-2
9030-06-2
0
1
0
Glucosyltransferase, uridine diphosphoglucosefructose phosphate
XXII-2
146480-37-7
0
1
0
Glucosyltransferase, uridine diphosphoglucosesalicylate 3-
XXII-2
37294-28-3
0
1
0
Glucoxylan
576-37-4
0
1
0
Glucuronic acid
II.A-5, VIII-3 HOOC
OH
OH
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2
O HO OH
28905-07-9
0
1
0
D-D-Glucuronic acid, methyl ester
9001-45-0
0
1
0
Glucuronidase, E-
II.A-5, V-3, X-2 XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1621
11/24/08 1:56:27 PM
1622
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
32449-92-6
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
II.A-5, VI-3, X-2
OH
D-Glucurono-3,6-lactone
Chapter Table
O O
OH O OH
62930-75-0
0
1
0
Glucuronomannan
II.A-5, VIII-3
77272-02-7
0
1
0
Glucuronomannoarabinan
II.A-5, VIII-3
6899-05-4
1
1
1
Glutamic acid
56-86-0
0
1
0
L-Glutamic acid
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
HOOC-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
997-68-2
0
1
0
L-Glutamic acid, N-(5-amino-5-carboxypentyl)-, (S)-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
58-05-9
0
1
0
L-Glutamic acid, N-[4-[[(2-amino-5-formyl1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-4-oxo-6pteridinyl)methyl]amino]benzoyl]-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
1116-22-9
0
1
0
L-Glutamic acid, N-L-J-glutamyl-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
3929-61-1
0
1
0
L-Glutamic acid, N-L-D-glutamyl-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
6899-04-3
0
1
0
Glutamine
56-85-9
1
1
1
L-Glutamine
9046-27-9
0
1
0
Glutamyltransferase, J-
H2N-OC-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XIII-1 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
9061-41-0
0
1
0
Glutenin
56-40-6
1
1
1
Glycine
18875-39-3
0
1
0
Glycine, labeled with C
0
1
0
Glycine, N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)-
XXII-2 XXII-2 H2N-CH2-COOH
14
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
88476-94-2
0
1
0
Glycine, N-(1-nitroso-L-prolyl)-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XV-8, XVII.A-4
70-18-8
0
1
0
Glycine, N-(N-L-J-glutamyl-L-cysteinyl){glutathione}
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVIII.A-1
1071-83-6
0
1
0
Glycine, N-(phosphonomethyl)-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
1118-68-9
0
1
0
Glycine, N,N-dimethyl-
73360-07-3
0
1
0
Glycine, N-[2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethenyl]-
(H3C)2=N-CH2-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
19246-18-5
0
1
0
Glycine, N-L-cysteinyl-
20661-60-3
0
1
0
Glycine, N-methyl-N-nitro-
13256-22-9
1
1
1
Glycine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-
1
1
1
Glycine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-, methyl ester
0
1
0
Glycosidase
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, X-1, XII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVIII.A-1 XVI-1 {NSAR}
H3C-N(NO)-CH2-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XV-8 H3C-N(NO)-CH2-COO CH3 V-3, XII-2, XV-8 XXII-2
9001-97-2
0
1
0
Glycosyltransferase, D-glucan-branching
XXII-2
37347-76-5
0
1
0
Glyoxalase
XXII-2
7440-57-5
1
1
1
Gold
306-60-5
0
1
0
Guanidine, (4-aminobutyl)-
Au
XX-5 XII-2
86-01-1
0
1
0
Guanosine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate)
7440-58-6
1
1
1
Hafnium
XII-2, XVII.E-8
9034-32-6
0
1
0
Hemicellulose
VIII-3
63100-39-0
0
1
0
Hemicellulose A
VIII-3
Hf
XX-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1622
11/24/08 1:56:27 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1623
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
63100-40-3
0
1
0
Hemicellulose B
VIII-3
65058-12-0
0
1
0
Hemicellulose C
VIII-3
629-94-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
Heneicosane
H3C-(CH2)19-CH3
I.A-10
1
0
0
Heneicosane, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)18-CH3
I.A-10
1
0
0
Heneicosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)17-CH3
I.A-10
2363-71-5
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)19-COOH
4.A-3
42233-02-3
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42232-93-9
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
42233-00-1
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
42233-01-2
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
42232-98-4
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
1
0
0
Heneicosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
42232-97-3
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
42232-99-5
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
121878-00-0
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, octacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)27-CH3
V-3
1
0
0
Heneicosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
42232-96-2
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42233-04-5
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
42232-95-1
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
42233-03-4
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
42232-94-0
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
36332-94-2
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, 19-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)17-COOH
121877-70-1
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, 19-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-61-0
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, 19-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3 (H3C)2=CH-(CH2)18-COOH
6704-01-4
1
1
1
Heneicosanoic acid, 20-methyl-
71278-17-6
1
0
0
Heneicosanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester
15594-90-8
1
1
1
1-Heneicosanol
H3C-(CH2)19-CH2OH
1599-68-4
28984-67-0
V-3 IV.A-3
IV.A-3 V-3 II.A-5
1
0
0
1-Heneicosene
H3C-(CH2)18-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Heneicosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)18-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)17-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)H=CH-(CH2)17-CH3
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, 19-methyl-,(Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)15-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, 19-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, 20-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Heneicosene, 20-methyl-, (E)-
1
1
1
Heneicosenoic acid
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)16-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1 IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1623
11/24/08 1:56:28 PM
1624
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
66288-40-2
1
0
0
Heneicosenoic acid, 19-methyl-
IV.A-3
66288-41-3
1
0
0
Heneicosenoic acid, 20-methyl-
IV.A-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
H3C-(CH2)39-CH3
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Hentetracontane
6704-02-5
1
0
0
5,9,13,17,21,25,29-Hentriacontaheptaen-2-one, 6,10,14,18,22,26,30-heptamethyl-
I.A-10
630-04-6
1
1
1
Hentriacontane
H3C-(CH2)29-CH3
1720-12-3
1
1
1
Hentriacontane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)28-CH3
I.A-10
4981-99-1
1
1
1
Hentriacontane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)27-CH3
I.A-10 IV.A-3
III-13 I.A-10
67537-80-8
1
0
0
Hentriacontanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)29-COOH
71278-18-7
1
0
0
Hentriacontanoic acid, hentriacontyl ester
H3C-(CH2)29-COO-(CH2)30-CH3
V -3
H3C-(CH2)14-CO-(CH2)14-CH3
III-13
502-73-8
1
1
1
16-Hentriacontanone
77046-64-1
1
1
1
Hentriacontene
18435-54-6
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Hentriacontene
H3C-(CH2)28-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Hentriacontene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)28-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hentriacontene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)27-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hentriacontene, (E)-
1
1
1
2-Hentriacontene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)27-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hentriacontene, 29-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)25-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hentriacontene, 29-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hentriacontene, 30-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Hentriacontene, 30-methyl-, (E)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)26-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
I.B-1 I.B-1
7719-93-9
1
1
1
Heptacontane
32304-17-9
1
1
1
5,9,13,17,21,25-Heptacosahexaen-2-one, 6,10,14,18,22,26-hexamethyl-, (all-E)-
H3C-(CH2)35-CH3
593-49-7
1
1
1
Heptacosane
H3C-(CH2)25-CH3
I.A-10 III-13 I.A-10
1561-00-8
1
1
1
Heptacosane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)24-CH3
I.A-10
14167-66-9
1
1
1
Heptacosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)23-CH3
I.A-10
7138-40-1
1
0
0
Heptacosanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)25-COOH
121877-96-1
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)231-CH3
V-3
117063-83-9
IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1624
11/24/08 1:56:28 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1625
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1
1
1
1
1
1
Selected structures
Chapter Table
Heptacosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
Heptacosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3 V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)25-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
121878-01-1
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, 25-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2CH(CH3)-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-93-8
1
1
1
Heptacosanoic acid, 25-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2CH(CH3)-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
2004-39-9
0
1
0
1-Heptacosanol
H3C-(CH2)25-CH2OH
II.A-5
63785-26-2
0
1
0
1-Heptacosanol, 26-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)24-CH2OH
II.A-5
542-50-7
0
1
0
14-Heptacosanone
H3C-(CH2)12-CO-(CH2)12-CH3
III-13
67537-80-8
1
0
0
Heptacosene
15306-27-1
1
0
0
1-Heptacosene
H3C-(CH2)24-CH=CH2
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)23-CH3
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)23-CH3
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, 25-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)21-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, 25-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, 26-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Heptacosene, 26-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
56797-42-3
0
1
0
8,11-Heptadecadienal, (Z,Z)-
III-12
37822-80-3
0
1
0
Heptadecadienoic acid, methyl ester
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)22-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
I.B-1
V-3
629-90-3
0
1
0
Heptadecanal
H3C-(CH2)15-CH=O
629-78-7
1
1
1
Heptadecane
H3C-(CH2)15-CH3
1560-89-0
I.B-1
III-12 I.A-10
1
1
1
Heptadecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)14-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
0
1
0
Heptadecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)13-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
13287-23-5
1
0
0
Heptadecane, 8-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)6-CH(CH3)-(CH2)8-CH3
I.A-10
506-12-7
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)15-COOH
IV.A-3
42218-25-7
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42232-43-9
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
36617-53-5
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
42232-52-0
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
36617-50-2
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
121877-64-3
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
36617-49-9
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1731-92-6
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-CH3
V-3
36617-52-4
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
36617-51-3
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
36617-48-8
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42232-54-2
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1625
11/24/08 1:56:29 PM
1626
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
36617-47-7
1
1
1
42232-53-1
1
1
1
Selected structures
Chapter Table
Heptadecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
Heptadecanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3 V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
36617-46-6
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
29709-08-8
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)13-COOH IV.A-3
121877-42-7
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-68-7
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, hexacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)25-CH3 V-3
121877-81-4
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, octacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)27-CH3 V-3
121877-52-9
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, tricosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)22-CH3 V-3 (H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-COOH
2724-58-5
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-
150462-99-0
0
1
0
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, 2-(acetyloxy)-1(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester
II.A-5, V-3
IV.A-3
150462-98-9
0
1
0
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, 3-(acetyloxy)-2hydroxypropyl ester
II.A-5, V-3
121877-46-1
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, docosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
52458-35-2
0
1
0
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, ethyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-COO-C2H5
V-3
121877-36-9
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
5129-61-3
0
1
0
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, methyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-COO-CH3
V-3
121877-50-7
1
1
1
Heptadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, tricosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)22-CH3 V-3
71278-19-8
0
1
0
Heptadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester
V-3
1
0
0
Heptadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester
V-3
1454-85-9
1
1
1
1-Heptadecanol
H3C-(CH2)15-CH2OH
II.A-5
41744-75-6
1
0
0
1-Heptadecanol, 16-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)14-CH2OH
II.A-5
56797-44-5
0
1
0
8,11,14-Heptadecatrienal, (Z,Z,Z)-
37822-82-5
0
1
0
Heptadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester
26266-05-7
1
1
1
Heptadecene
H-(CH2)15-n-CH=CH-(CH2)n-H
I.B-1
6765-39-5
1
0
0
1-Heptadecene
H3C-(CH2)14-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Heptadecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)14-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)13-CH3
I.B-1 I.B-1
36232-39-0
III-12 V-3
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)13-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, 15-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)11-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, 15-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, 16-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, 16-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Heptadecene, 4-methylene-8,12,16-trimethyl-
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)12-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-C(=CH2)-CH2-{(CH2)2-CH(CH3)CH2}3-H I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1626
11/24/08 1:56:30 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1627
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
26265-99-6
1
1
1
Heptadecenoic acid
H-(CH2)14-n-CH=CH-(CH2)n-COOH IV.A-3
31424-16-5
0
1
0
Heptadecenoic acid, methyl ester
H-(CH2)14-n-CH=CH-(CH2)n-COO-CH3 V-3
4313-03-5 5910-85-0
0
1
0
2,4-Heptadienal
O=CH-CH=CH-CH=CH-CH2-CH=O
51945-98-3
0
1
0
1,5-Heptadiene-3,4-diol
H3C-CH=CH-CHOH-CHOH-CH=CH2 II.A-5
74630-29-8
0
1
0
1,5-Heptadiene, 3,3,5-trimethyl-
H3C-CH=C(CH3)-CH2-C(CH3)2-CH=CH2 I.B-1
1
0
0
2,4-Heptadiene, 2,6-dimethyl-
72693-11-9
1
1
1
2,5-Heptadienoic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-
IV.A-3
54557-55-0
0
1
0
4,6-Heptadienoic acid, 6-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-, (E)-
IV.A-3
54557-57-2
0
1
0
4,6-Heptadienoic acid, 6-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-, methyl ester, (E)-
V-3
77411-76-8
0
1
0
3,5-Heptadien-2-ol, 2,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5
57935-33-8
0
1
0
4,6-Heptadien-1-ol, 6-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-, (E)-
II.A-5
79-78-7
0
1
0
1,6-Heptadien-3-one, 1-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2cyclohexen-1-yl){allylionone}
III-13
0
1
0
3,5-Heptadien-2-one, 6-methyl-, (Z)-
1
1
1
3,5-Heptadien-2-one, 6-methyl-, (E)-
0
1
0
4,6-Heptadien-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)-7(tetrahydro-2-methylfuranyl)-
3511-27-1
1
0
0
1,5-Heptadien-3-yne
H3C-CH=CH-CŁC-CH=CH2
I.B-1
111-71-7
1
0
0
Heptanal
H3C-(CH2)5-CH=O
III-12
111-68-2
1
1
1
1-Heptanamine
H3C-(CH2)6-NH2
XII-2
142-82-5
1
0
0
Heptane
H3C-(CH2)5-CH3
I.A-10
H3C-(CH2)5-CH2Cl
1604-28-0
629-06-1 2213-23-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
III-12
I.B-1
III-13 (H3C)2=C=CH-CH=CH-CO-CH3
III-13 III-13, X-2
1
0
0
Heptane, 1-chloro-
1
0
0
Heptane, dimethyl-
XVIII.B-3 I.A-10
0
1
0
Heptane, 2,4-dimethyl-
I.A-10
592-27-8
1
0
0
Heptane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
15869-80-4
1
0
0
Heptane, 3-ethyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-CH=(C2H5)2
I.A-10 I.A-10
589-81-1
1
0
0
Heptane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
1632-16-2
0
1
0
Heptane, 3-methylene-
H3C-(CH2)3-C(=CH2)-CH2-CH3
646-20-8
1
0
0
Heptanedinitrile
111-16-0
1
0
0
Heptanedioic acid
NC-(CH2)5-CN {pimelic acid}
I.B-1 XI-2
HOOC-(CH2)5-COOH
IV.A-3
535-24-0
0
1
0
Heptanedioic acid, 2,6-diamino-3-hydroxy-
96-04-8
1
0
0
2,3-Heptanedione
H3C-(CH2)3-CO-CO-CH3
III-13
7307-02-0
1
0
0
2,4-Heptanedione
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-CH2-CO-CH3
III-13
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CO-CH2-CO-CH3
3002-23-1
II.A-5, IV.A-3, XII-2
0
1
0
2,4-Heptanedione, 6-methyl-
0
1
0
2,5-Heptanedione, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
13901-85-4
0
1
0
2,5-Heptanedione, 6-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CO-(CH2)2-CO-CH3
III-13
13505-34-5
1
1
1
2,6-Heptanedione
H3C-CO-(CH2)3-CO-CH3
III-13
0
1
0
2,6-Heptanedione, 3-methyl-
H3C-CO-CH(CH3)-(CH2)2-CO-CH3
III-13
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1627
11/24/08 1:56:30 PM
1628
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 111-14-8
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index) {enanthic acid}
Chapter Table
Selected structures
1
1
1
Heptanoic acid
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 2-ethyl-
H 3C-(CH2)5-COOH
IV.A-3
59262-53-2
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-, (S)-
39815-78-6
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 3-oxo-, methyl ester
1070-68-4
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 5-methyl-
42330-36-9
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 5-methyl-, (S)-
IV.A-3
929-10-2
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 6-methyl-
IV.A-3
IV.A-3 III-13, IV.A-3 H3C-(CH2)3-CO-CH2-COO-CH3 III-13, V-3 IV.A-3
3128-07-2
1
0
0
Heptanoic acid, 6-oxo-
98188-02-4
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, 7-(2-furanyl)-, methyl ester
H3C-CO-(CH2)4-COOH
III-13, IV.A-3 V-3, X-2
106-30-9
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)5-COO-C2H5
V-3
106-73-0
0
1
0
Heptanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)5-COO-CH3
V-3
111-70-6
1
1
1
1-Heptanol
H3C-(CH2)5-CH2OH
1653-40-3
0
1
0
1-Heptanol, 6-methyl-
543-49-7
0
1
0
2-Heptanol
II.A-5 H3C-(CH2)4-CHOH-CH3
110-43-0
1
1
1
2-Heptanone
52812-44-9
1
0
0
2-Heptanone, 5-(3-acetyloxiranyl)-6-methyl-
52812-43-8
0
1
0
2-Heptanone, 5-[3-(1-hydroxy-1methylethyl)oxiranyl]-6-methyl-
0
1
0
2-Heptanone, 5-(2,3-dihydro-4-methyl-6-pyranyl)-6methyl-
0
1
0
2-Heptanone, 5-(5,6-dihydro-4-methyl-2-pyranyl)-6methyl-
{methyl pentyl ketone}
0
1
0
2-Heptanone, 6-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
72693-12-0
1
0
0
2-Heptanone, 6-hydroxy-
928-68-7
1
1
1
2-Heptanone, 6-methyl-
41059-93-2
0
1
0
2-Heptanone, 6-methyl-5-(4-methyl-2-furanyl){solanofuran}
106-35-4
1
0
0
3-Heptanone
19549-83-8
1
0
0
3-Heptanone, 2,6-dimethyl-
123-19-3
1
0
0
4-Heptanone
III-13 III-13 II.A-5, III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2
H3C O CH3 O
121269-00-9
II.A-5
H3C-(CH2)4-CO-CH3
H3C
108-83-8
II.A-5
CH3
III-13, X-2 H3C-CHOH-(CH2)3-CO-CH3
II.A-5, III-13 III-13
{ethyl butyl ketone} {butyrone; dipropyl ketone}
O
O
H3C-CH2-CO-(CH2)3-CH3
III-13, X-2
III-13 III-13
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-(CH2)2-CH3
III-13
1
0
0
4-Heptanone, 2,6-dimethyl-
1
1
1
Heptatriacontane
III-13
24587-25-5
1
0
0
1,3,5-Heptatriene
H3C-(CH=CH)2-CH=CH2
2463-63-0
0
1
0
2-Heptenal
H3C-(CH2)3-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12
30567-26-1
1
0
0
2-Heptenal, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-CH=C(CH3)-CH=O
III-12
H3C-(CH2)35-CH3
I.A-10 I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1628
11/24/08 1:56:31 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1629
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
34098-52-7
0
1
0
D-xylo-Hept-2-enaric acid, 2,6-anhydro-3-deoxy{2H-pyran-2,4-dicarboxylic acid, 3,4-dihydro-3,4dihydroxy-}
592-76-7
1
0
0
1-Heptene
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5
H2C=CH-(CH2)4-CH3
I.B-1 I.B-1
592-77-8
1
0
0
2-Heptene
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)3-CH3
77288-93-8
0
1
0
2-Heptene-1,6-diol, 3-(1-methylethyl)-, (E)-
H3C-CHOH-(CH2)2-C[CH(CH3)2] =CH-CH2OH II.A-5
21504-51-8
0
1
0
3-Heptene-2,5-dione, 6-methyl-
25377-46-2
1
1
1
Heptenoic acid
III-13
18999-28-5
0
1
0
2-Heptenoic acid
H3C-(CH2)3-CH=CH-COOH
499-84-3
0
1
0
2-Heptenoic acid, 3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-
H3C-CO-(CH2)2-C[CH(CH3)2]=CH-COOH III-13, IV.A-3
41654-06-2
0
1
0
2-Heptenoic acid, 3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-, (E)-
63892-03-5
0
1
0
2-Heptenoic acid, 3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-, (Z)-
35194-37-7
0
1
0
4-Heptenoic acid
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
III-13, IV.A-3 III-13, IV.A-3 H3C-CH2-CH=CH-(CH2)2-COOH
IV.A-3
41653-95-6
0
1
0
4-Heptenoic acid, (Z)-
105728-84-5
0
1
0
4-Heptenoic acid, 6-hydroxy-
41654-07-3
0
1
0
4-Heptenoic acid, 3-(1-methylethyl)-6-oxo-, (E)-
H3C-CO-CH=CH-CH[CH(CH3)2]-CH2-COOH III-13, IV.A-3
1119-60-4
0
1
0
6-Heptenoic acid
H2C=CH-(CH2)4-COOH
IV.A-3
0
1
0
6-Heptenoic acid, 5-methyl-
H2C=CH-CH(CH3)-(CH2)3-COOH
IV.A-3
0
1
0
6-Heptenoic acid, 3-oxo-, methyl ester
H2C=CH-(CH2)2-CO-CH2-COO-CH3
30414-57-4
IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
V-3 1335-09-7
0
1
0
Heptenol, methyl-
33467-78-4
0
1
0
2-Hepten-1-ol (E)
II.A-5 H3C-(CH2)3-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5
55454-22-3
0
1
0
2-Hepten-1-ol (Z)
II.A-5
70898-26-9
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-ol, 5-ethyl-2,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-ol, 5-(1-methylethy)-2-methyl-
II.A-5
58927-84-7
0
1
0
4-Hepten-2-ol, 6-methyl-, (E)-
II.A-5
1569-60-4
0
1
0
5-Hepten-2-ol, 6-methyl-
II.A-5
42201-30-9
0
1
0
6-Hepten-2-ol, 4-methylene-
57782-61-3
0
1
0
6-Hepten-2-ol, 5-(1-methylethyl)-7-(tetrahydro-2methyl-2-furanyl)-
409-02-9
0
1
0
Heptenone, methyl-
II.A-5 II.A-5, X-2 III-13
1119-44-4
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-one
129742-47-8
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-one, 5-ethyl-5-hydroxy-6-methyl-, [R(E)]-
57283-79-1
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-one, 5-ethyl-6-methyl-
III-13
50767-76-5
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH-CO-CH3
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-one, 5-ethyl-6-methyl-, (E)-
III-13
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
2009-74-7
1
1
1
3-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl-
152209-54-6
0
1
0
3-Hepten-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)-7-[2-methyl-3-(3methyl-5-oxo-3-hexenyl)oxiranyl]-, [2S[2D(3E,5R*),3E(E)]]-
III-13 III-13, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1629
11/24/08 1:56:31 PM
1630
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
110-93-0
1
1
1
5-Hepten-2-one, 6-methyl-
57782-60-2
0
1
0
6-Hepten-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)-7-(tetrahydro-2methyl-2-furanyl)-
Selected structures
Chapter Table III-13 III-13, X-2
CH3 O
CH=CH-CH-(CH2)2-CO-CH3
H3C
CH3
104669-35-4
0
1
0
6-Hepten-2-one, 5-(1-methylethyl)-7-(tetrahydro-4hydroxy-2-methyl-2-furanyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
160115-55-9
0
1
0
6-Hepten-2-one, 7-[4-(acetyloxy)tetrahydro-5hydroxy-2-methyl-2-furanyl]-5-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
117210-48-7
0
1
0
6-Hepten-2-one, 7-[tetrahydro-2-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-2-furanyl]-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
628-71-7
1
0
0
1-Heptyne
H3C-(CH2)4-CŁCH
I.B-1
2586-89-2
1
0
0
3-Heptyne
H3C-(CH2)2-CŁC-CH2-CH3
I.B-1
630-01-3
1
1
1
Hexacosane
H3C-(CH2)24-CH3
I.A-10
1561-02-0
1
1
1
Hexacosane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)23-CH3
I.A-10
65820-56-6
0
1
0
Hexacosane, 3-methyl-
506-46-7
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid
108657-23-4 121877-83-6
{cerotinic acid}
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)22-CH3
I.A-10
H3C-(CH2)24-COOH
IV.A-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, ester with olean-12-en-3-ol, (3E){ȕ-amyrenyl hexacosanoate)
V3
121877-89-2
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
75696-56-9
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)193-CH3
V-3
121877-97-2
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
121877-92-7
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, 24-methyl-, docosyl ester
V-3
121877-90-5
1
1
1
Hexacosanoic acid, 24-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
V-3
506-52-5
0
1
0
1-Hexacosanol
63785-25-1
0
1
0
1-Hexacosanol, 24-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)24-CH2OH
II.A-5
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Hexacosanol, 25-methyl-
II.A-5
84808-91-9
1
0
0
Hexacosene
I.B-1
18835-33-1
1
0
0
1-Hexacosene
H2C=CH-(CH2)23-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Hexacosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)23-CH3
I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1630
11/24/08 1:56:32 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1631
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)22-CH3
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, 24-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)20-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, 24-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, 25-methyl-, (Z)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)22-CH3
Chapter Table I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)21-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hexacosene, 24-methyl-, (E)-
30917-33-0
1
0
0
1,3-Hexadecadiene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
H[CH2CH2CH(CH3)CH2] 3-CH=CHC(CH3)=CH2
I.B-1
21980-71-2
1
0
0
1,3-Hexadecadiene, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl{phytadiene}
H[CH2CH(CH3)CH2CH2] 3-CH=CHC(CH3)=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1,3-Hexadecadiene, 2,6,10-trimethyl-
I.B-1
0
1
0
2,4-Hexadexadiene, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-
I.B-1
25377-52-0
1
1
1
Hexadecadienoic acid
29961-54-4
0
1
0
Hexadecadienoic acid, methyl ester
629-80-1
0
1
0
Hexadecanal
H3C-(CH2)14-CH=O
III-12
544-76-3
1
1
1
Hexadecane
H3C-(CH2)14-CH3
I.A-10
1560-92-5
I.B-1
{palmitolenic acid}
IV.A-3 V-3
0
1
0
Hexadecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)13-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
0
1
0
Hexadecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)12-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
638-36-8
1
1
1
Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
36232-38-9
1
0
0
Hexadecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl-14-methylene-
60922-91-0
1
0
0
Hexadecane, mixt. with pentane
505-54-4
0
1
0
Hexadecanedioic acid
57-10-3
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid
{phytane}
I.A-10 I.B-1 I.A-10
{palmitic acid}
HOOC-(CH2)14-COOH
IV.A-3
H3C-(CH2)14-COOH
IV.A-3
42232-33-7
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42232-29-1
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
80252-38-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, dotriacontyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)31-CH3
V-3
22413-01-0
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
628-97-7
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
{ethyl palmitate}
42232-32-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
94632-82-3
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
18466-06-3
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
60007-87-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
540-10-3
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
23470-00-0
1
0
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-1(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-CH=(CH2OH)2
V-3
28801-93-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl-
112-39-0
IV.A-3
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, (1-methylethyl) ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-CH3
V-3
36617-44-4
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
78509-52-1
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, octacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)27-CH3
V-3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1631
11/24/08 1:56:33 PM
1632
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
2598-99-4
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
94632-81-2
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
18299-77-9
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42232-35-9
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)33-CH3
V-3
4536-26-9
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
84461-48-3
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, tetratriacontyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)33-CH3
V-3
6027-71-0
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, triacontyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)29-CH3
V-3
42232-34-8
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
H3C-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
36617-38-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, tridecyl ester
3233-90-7
0
1
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 10,16-dihydroxy-
5918-29-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COOH IV.A-3
121877-41-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-33-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-67-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, heptacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)26-CH3 V-3
121877-58-5
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, hexacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)25-CH3 V-3
2490-49-5
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COO-CH3 V-3
121877-74-5
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, octacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)27-CH3 V-3
1603-03-8
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)13-COOH
121877-39-2
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, docosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
6929-04-0
0
1
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, methyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)13-COO-CH3
506-13-8
0
1
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 16-hydroxy-
HOCH2-(CH2)14-COOH
IV.A-3
27147-71-3
0
1
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)13-CH(CH3)-COOH
IV.A-3
42172-35-0
0
1
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)12-CH(CH3)-CH2-COOH IV.A-3
71607-94-8
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-hexatria contanonaenyl ester
V-3
1118-77-0
0
1
0
Hexadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, methyl ester
V-3
53950-58-6
1
1
1
Hexadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
V-3
124-29-8
1
1
1
1-Hexadecanol
2490-43-9
0
1
0
1-Hexadecanol, 14-methyl-
645-72-7
1
1
1
1-Hexadecanol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl{dihydrophytol}
II.A-5, IV.A-3
IV.A-3 V-3
H3C-(CH2)14-CH2OH
H3C
II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5
CH3 CH3
CH2OH
H[CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH2]4-OH
H3C CH3
60054-55-9
0
1
0
1-Hexadecanol, 7,11,15-trimethyl-3-methylene-
18787-63-8
1
1
1
2-Hexadecanone
H3C-(CH2)13-CO-CH3
II.A-5 III-13
34083-18-6
1
0
0
2,6,10,14-Hexadecatetraene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
H-[CH2-C(CH3)=CH-CH2]4-H
I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1632
11/24/08 1:56:33 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1633
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
70901-63-2
0
1
0
1,6,10,14-Hexadecatetraene, 7,11,15-trimethyl-3methylene-, (E,E)-
I.B-1
76540-54-0
0
1
0
1,6,10,14-Hexadecatetraene-3,9-diol, 3,7,11,15tetramethyl-
II.A-5
76540-55-1
0
1
0
2,6,10,15-Hexadecatetraene-1,14-diol, 2,6,10,14tetramethyl-, [S-(Z,E,E)]-
II.A-5
25377-56-4
0
1
0
Hexadecatrienoic acid
IV.A-3
32839-24-0
0
1
0
Hexadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)-
IV.A-3
37822-81-4
0
1
0
Hexadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester
26952-14-7
0
1
0
Hexadecene
629-73-2
1
0
0
1-Hexadecene
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
V-3 I.B-1 {1-cetene}
H2C=CH-(CH2)13-CH3 H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)13-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Hexadecene, 2-methyl-
71278-20-1
1
0
0
1-Hexadecene, 2,6,10-trimethyl-
I.B-1
504-96-1
1
1
1
1-Hexadecene, 3-methylene-7,11,15-trimethyl{neophytadiene}
0
1
0
1-Hexadecene, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)12-CH3
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, 14-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)10-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, 14-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, 15-methyl-, (Z)-
I.B-1 H2C=CH-C(=CH2)-CH2-{(CH2)2CH(CH3)CH2}3-H
I.B-1 I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)12-CH3
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)11-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Hexadecene, 15-methyl-, (E)-
51806-25-8
0
1
0
4-Hexadecene, 3-methylene-7,11,15-trimethyl-
I.B-1
25447-95-4
1
1
1
Hexadecenoic acid
IV.A-3
28039-99-8
0
1
0
Hexadecenoic acid, (Z)-
IV.A-3
1686-10-8
0
1
0
3-Hexadecenoic acid, (E)-
IV.A-3
H3C-CH2-C(=CH2)-CH=CH-CH2-CH(CH3)CH2-{(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH2}2-H I.B-1
373-49-9
1
1
1
9-Hexadecenoic acid, (Z)-
{palmitoleic acid}
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)5-COOH IV.A-3
10030-73-6 2091-29-4
1
1
1
9-Hexadecenoic acid, (E)-
{palmitelaidic acid}
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)5-COOH IV.A-3
1120-25-8
0
1
0
9-Hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)-
505-32-8
1
1
1
1-Hexadecen-3-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl{isophytol}
22104-83-2
0
1
0
2-Hexadecen-1-ol
102608-53-7
0
1
0
2-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-
150-86-7
1
1
1
2-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, [R[R*,R*-(E)]]{phytol}
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)5-COO-CH3 V-3 II.A-5 H3C-(CH2)12-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5
H3C
II.A-5
CH3 CH3
CH2OH
H3C CH3
60026-26-8
0
1
0
7-Hexadecen-6-one, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-
80466-34-8
0
1
0
2,4-Hexadienal
III-13 H3C-(CH=CH)2-CH=O
III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1633
11/24/08 1:56:34 PM
1634
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
142-83-6
1
1
1
2,4-Hexadienal, (E,E)-
III-12
54612-24-7
1
0
0
Hexadiene, dimethyl-
I.B-1
1
0
0
Hexadiene, methyl-
I.B-1
1
0
0
1,3-Hexadiene, 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethyl-
I.B-1
927-97-9
1
0
0
1,4-Hexadiene, 2,5-dimethyl-
I.B-1
764-13-6
1
0
0
2,4-Hexadiene, 2,5-dimethyl-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2,4-Hexadiene, 3,4-dimethyl-
110-44-1
1
1
1
2,4-Hexadienoic acid, (E,E)-
I.B-1
590-00-1 24634-61-5
0
1
0
2,4-Hexadienoic acid, potassium salt
90-65-3
1
0
0
2,5-Hexadienoic acid, 3-methoxy-5-methyl-4-oxo-
10420-90-3
1
0
0
1,3-Hexadien-5-yne
{sorbic acid}
H3C-(CH=CH)2-COOH
IV.A-3
H3C-(CH=CH)2-COOK
XX-6 III-13, IV.A-3, X-2
HCŁC-CH=CH-CH=CH2
821-08-9
1
0
0
1,5-Hexadien-3-yne
66-25-1
1
1
1
Hexanal
15303-46-5
0
1
0
Hexanal, 2-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-
2363-84-0
1
0
0
Hexanal, 2-oxo-
H3C-(CH2)3-CO-CH=O
III-12, III-13
0
1
0
Hexanal, 4-oxo-
H3C-CH2-CO-(CH2)2-CH=O
III-12, III-13
1
0
0
Hexanamide
H3C-(CH2)4-CO-NH2 H3C-(CH2)5-NH2
628-02-4
{divinylacetylene} {caproic aldehyde}
H2C=CH-CŁC-CH=CH2
I.B-1
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=O
I.B-1 III-12 III-12, III-13
111-26-2
1
1
1
1-Hexanamine
28056-87-3
1
0
0
1-Hexanamine, 2-ethyl-N,N-dimethyl-
XIII-1 XII-2 XII-2
110-54-3
1
1
1
Hexane
33240-56-1
1
0
0
Hexane, 1-chloro-5-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)4-CH3
I.A-10
28777-67-5
1
0
0
Hexane, dimethyl-
I.A-10
XVIII.B-3
1
0
0
Hexane, 2,4-dimethyl-
I.A-10
592-13-2
1
0
0
Hexane, 2,5-dimethyl-
I.A-10
50-70-4
1
1
1
Hexane, hexahydroxy-
585-88-6
0
1
0
Hexane, hexahydroxy-, 4-O-ȕ-D-glucopyranosyl{maltitol; 4-O-ȕ-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol}
{sorbitol; glucitol}
HOCH2-(CHOH)4-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5, X-2
OH HO
OH
HO
O
OH
O
HO OH
589-34-4
OH
OH
0
1
0
Hexane, hexahydroxy-, 2,6-di-O-methyl-
0
1
0
Hexane, hexahydroxy-, 2,3,6-tri-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Hexane, hexahydroxy-, 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
1
0
0
Hexane, 3-methyl-
1071-81-4
1
0
0
Hexane, 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-
124-04-9
1
0
0
Hexanedioic acid
542-32-5
0
1
0
Hexanedioic acid, 2-amino-
123-79-5
1
0
0
Hexanedioic acid, dioctyl ester
II.A-5, X-2
I.A-10 {adipic acid}
103-23-1
1
0
0
Hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester
3184-35-8
1
1
1
Hexanedioic acid, 2-oxo-
77289-00-0
0
1
0
1,5-Hexanediol, 2-(1-methylethyl)-, [S-(R*,R*)]-
(H3C)3ŁC-(CH2)2-CŁ(CH3)3
I.A-10
HOOC-(CH2)4-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3, XII-2 V-3 V-3 III-13, IV.A-3 II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1634
11/24/08 1:56:34 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1635
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
2935-44-6
1
1
1
2,5-Hexanediol
29044-06-2
0
1
0
2,5-Hexanediol, 2-methyl-
Chapter Table
Selected structures H3C-CHOH (CH2)2-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5 II.A-5
3848-24-6
1
0
0
2,3-Hexanedione
110-13-4
1
1
1
2,5-Hexanedione
1
0
0
2,5-Hexanedione, 3-hydroxy-
III-13
1
0
0
2,5-Hexanedione, 3-methyl-
III-13
1
0
0
3,4-Hexanedione
1
0
0
3,4-Hexanedione, 2-methyl-
4437-50-7
H3C-CO-CO-(CH2)3-CH3
III-13
H3C-CH2-CO-CO-CH2-CH3
III-13 III-13
628-73-9
1
0
0
Hexanenitrile
64350-07-8
1
0
0
Hexanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-
111-31-9
1
0
0
1-Hexanethiol
18990-98-2
1
0
0
1,3,6-Hexanetriol
142-62-1
1
1
1
Hexanoic acid
60308-81-8
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 4,5-dimethyl-
123-66-0
1
1
1
Hexanoic acid, ethyl ester
1
1
1
Hexanoic acid, 2,6-di-(methylnitrosamino)-
1
1
1
Hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-
149-57-5
III-13
{acetonylacetone}
{capronitrile}
H3C-(CH2)4-CN
XI-1 II.A-5, XI-1
H3C-(CH2)5-SH
XVIII.A-1 II.A-5
{caproic acid}
H 3C-(CH2)4-COOH
IV.A-3, XXI-3 IV.A-3
{ethyl caproate}
H3C-(CH2)4-COO-C2H5
V-3
R-(CH2)4-CH(R)-COOH where R = H3C-N(NO)IV.A-3, XV-8 IV.A-3
1
0
0
Hexanoic acid, hydroxy-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
6064-63-7
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
1191-25-9
1
0
0
Hexanoic acid, 6-hydroxy-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
40309-49-7
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-5-methyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, cis-3-hexenyl ester
V-3
106-70-7
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, methyl ester
4536-23-6
1
1
1
Hexanoic acid, 2-methyl- {2-methylhexanoic acid}
H3C-(CH2)4-COO-CH3
IV.A-3
V-3
3780-58-3
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 3-methyl-
IV.A-3
1561-11-1
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 4-methyl-
IV.A-3
628-46-6
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 5-methyl-
30414-55-2
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 5-methyl-3-oxo-, methyl ester
IV.A-3
41654-04-0
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 5-methyl-4-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
2543-54-6
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 2-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
16825-90-4
1
0
0
Hexanoic acid, 2-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-, (S)-
III-13, IV.A-3
1842-56-4
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 2-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-, methyl ester
1117-74-4
1
1
1
Hexanoic acid, 4-oxo-
3128-06-1
1
0
0
Hexanoic acid, 5-oxo-
540-07-8
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, pentyl ester
6290-37-5
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester
6938-45-0
0
1
0
Hexanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester
V-3
2051-49-2
0
1
0
Hexanoic anhydride
VII-1
25917-35-5
1
1
1
Hexanol
111-27-3
1
1
1
1-Hexanol
III-13, V-3
III-13, V-3 III-13, IV.A-3 III-13, IV.A-3 H3C-(CH2)4-COO-(CH2)4-C H3
V-3 V-3
II.A-5 {caproyl alcohol}
H3C-(CH2)4-CH2OH
II.A-5, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1635
11/24/08 1:56:35 PM
1636
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
104-76-7
1
1
1
1-Hexanol, 2-ethyl-
61949-26-6
1
0
0
1-Hexanol, methyl-
818-49-5
0
1
0
1-Hexanol, 4-methyl-
627-98-5
0
1
0
1-Hexanol, 5-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)3-CH2OH H3C-(CH2)3-CHOH-CH3
626-93-7
1
1
1
2-Hexanol
0
1
0
2-Hexanol, 2-cyclohexanyl-
Chapter Table
Selected structures H3C-(CH2)3-CH(C2H5)-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5
623-37-0
1
1
1
3-Hexanol
II.A-5
2180-43-0
1
0
0
3-Hexanol, 1-phenyl-
II.A-5
1
0
0
4-Hexanol, 1-phenyl-
14360-50-0
1
0
0
1-Hexanone, 1-(2-furanyl)-
II.A-5
591-78-6
1
1
1
2-Hexanone
72693-13-1
1
0
0
2-Hexanone, 5,6-dihydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
56745-61-0
1
0
0
2-Hexanone, 5-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13
68208-73-1
1
0
0
2-Hexanone, 6-hydroxy-5-methyl-
589-38-8
1
1
1
3-Hexanone
71278-21-2
1
1
1
1,3,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-Hexatriacontadecaene, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl{solanesene}
III-13, X-2 {butyl methyl ketone}
H3C-(CH2)3-CO-CH3
III-13
II.A-5, III-13
{ethyl propyl ketone}
III-13 I.B-1
630-06-8
1
1
1
Hexatriacontane
71278-22-3
1
0
0
1,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-Hexatriacontanonaene, 7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-octamethyl-3-methylene-
H3C-(CH2)34-CH3
I.B-1
66327-99-9
1
0
0
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-Hexatriacontanonaene, 2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-nonamethyl-, (all-E)-
I.B-1
60924-87-0
0
1
0
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,35-Hexatriacontanonaene1,34-diol, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl-, (all-E)-
II.A-5
60924-86-9
0
1
0
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,33-Hexatriacontanonaene1,35-diol, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl-, (all-E)-
II.A-5
101330-76-1
0
1
0
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-Hexatriacontanonaen-1ol, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl-, labeled 14 with C, (Z,Z,Z)-
II.A-5
13190-97-1
1
1
1
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-Hexatriacontanonaen-1ol, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl-, (all-E){solanesol}
29144-38-5
1
1
1
2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-Hexatriacontanonaen-1ol, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl-, acetate, stereoisomer {solanesyl acetate}
2235-12-3
1
0
0
1,3,5-Hexatriene
1
0
0
1,3,5-Hexatriene, 2-methyl-
I.B-1
1
0
0
1,3,5-Hexatriene, 3-methyl-
I.B-1
1335-39-3
0
1
0
Hexenal
505-57-7
1
1
1
2-Hexenal
H-[CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH2]9-OH
I.A-10
II.A-5
V-3
H2C=CH-CH=CH-CH=CH2
I.B-1
III-12 H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12
6728-26-3
1
1
1
2-Hexenal, (E)-
III-12
16635-54-4
1
1
1
2-Hexenal, (Z)-
III-12
1
0
0
2-Hexenal, 2,5-dimethyl-
III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1636
11/24/08 1:56:35 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1637
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 28467-88-1
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
2-Hexenal, 2-methyl-
1
0
0
2-Hexenal, 5-methyl-
21834-92-4
0
1
0
2-Hexenal, 5-methyl-2-phenyl-
25264-93-1
1
0
0
Hexene
Selected structures H3C-(CH2)2-CH=C(CH3)-CH=O
Chapter Table III-12 III-12 III-12
H-(CH2)n-CH=CH-(CH2)(4-n)-H
I.B-1
1
0
0
Hexene, diamino
592-41-6
1
0
0
1-Hexene
H3C-(CH2)3-CH=CH2
XII-2 I.B-1
3524-73-0
1
0
0
1-Hexene, 5-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)2-CH=CH2
I.B-1
4050-45-7
1
0
0
2-Hexene, (E)-
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH-CH3
I.B-1
7688-21-3
1
0
0
2-Hexene, (Z)-
3404-78-2
1
0
0
2-Hexene, 2,5-dimethyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH=C(CH3)-CH3 I.B-1
I.B-1
2738-19-4
1
0
0
2-Hexene, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=C(CH3)-CH3
I.B-1
3404-62-4
1
0
0
2-Hexene, 5-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH=CH-CH3
I.B-1
592-47-2
1
0
0
3-Hexene
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CH2-CH3
I.B-1
13269-52-8
1
1
1
3-Hexene, (E)-
I.B-1
7642-09-3
1
0
0
3-Hexene, (Z)-
I.B-1
4436-75-3
0
1
0
3-Hexene, 2,5-dione
1289-40-3
1
0
0
Hexenoic acid
III-13
1191-04-4
0
1
0
2-Hexenoic acid
5309-52-4
0
1
0
2-Hexenoic acid, 2-ethyl-
41653-96-7
0
1
0
2-Hexenoic acid, 5-methyl-
51424-01-2
0
1
0
2-Hexenoic acid, 5-methyl-, (E)-
4219-24-3
1
1
1
3-Hexenoic acid
1775-43-5
0
1
0
3-Hexenoic acid, (Z)-
2396-78-3
0
1
0
3-Hexenoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CH2-COO-CH3
35194-36-6
1
1
1
4-Hexenoic acid
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)2-COOH
1577-20-4
1
1
1
4-Hexenoic acid, (E)-
5636-65-7
0
1
0
4-Hexenoic acid, 5-methyl-
IV.A-3
1577-22-6
0
1
0
5-Hexenoic acid
IV.A-3
IV.A-3 H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CH=CH-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
{hydrosorbic acid}
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CH2-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3 V-3 IV.A-3 IV.A-3
928-95-0
0
1
0
2-Hexen-1-ol
2305-21-7
0
1
0
2-Hexen-1-ol, (E)-
2497-18-9
0
1
0
2-Hexen-1-ol, acetate, (E)-
544-12-7
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol
II.A-5
928-97-2
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol, (E)-
II.A-5
928-96-1
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5 V-3
1
1
1
3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)-
{leaf alcohol}
II.A-5
1
1
1
3-Hexen-1-ol, (Z)-, labeled with C 14 {leaf alcohol- C}
XXV-29
1708-82-3
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol, acetate
V-3
3681-71-8
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol, acetate, (Z)-
V-3
25152-85-6
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol, benzoate, (Z)-
V-3
2315-09-5
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol, formate
V-3
33467-73-1
0
1
0
3-Hexen-1-ol, formate, (Z)-
763-93-9
1
0
0
3-Hexen-2-one
14
V-3 III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1637
11/24/08 1:56:36 PM
1638
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
5166-53-0
1
1
1
3-Hexen-2-one, 5-methyl-
III-13
1821-29-0
0
1
0
3-Hexen-2-one, 5-methyl-, (E)-
III-13
Name (per CA Collective Index)
109-49-9
1
1
1
5-Hexen-2-one
55615-04-8
0
1
0
5-Hexen-2-one, 4,5-dimethyl-
Selected structures
H2C=CH-(CH2)2-CO-CH3
Chapter Table
III-13 III-13
0
1
0
4-Hexen-3-one, 4,5-dimethyl-
121197-12-4
1
0
0
5-Hexen-3-one, 4,5-dihydroxy-
III-13
33124-69-5
0
1
0
threo-2,3-Hexodiulosonic acid, J-lactone
490-83-5
0
1
0
L-threo-2,3-Hexodiulosonic acid, J-lactone
61989-59-1
1
0
0
Hexonic acid, 2,3-dideoxy-, J-lactone, monoacetate
61892-51-1
1
0
0
Hexonic acid, 3,6-dideoxy-, J-lactone
II.A-5, III-13 VI-3 VI-3 V-3, VI-3 VI-3
61653-41-6
0
1
0
D-lyxo-Hexonic acid, 2-deoxy-, J-lactone
45009-62-9
0
1
0
Hexoses
VI-3
62446-36-0
0
1
0
Hexouronic acid
26856-30-4
1
0
0
Hexyne
H-(CH2)n-CŁC-(CH2)(4-n)-H
I.B-1
693-02-7
1
0
0
1-Hexyne
HCŁC-(CH2)3-CH3
I.B-1
II.A-5, VIII-3
2203-80-7
1
0
0
1-Hexyne, 5-methyl-
HCŁC-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
764-35-2
1
0
0
2-Hexyne
H3C-CŁC-(CH2)2-CH3
I.B-1
53566-37-3
1
0
0
2-Hexyne, 5-methyl-
H3C-CŁC-CH2-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
928-49-4
1
0
0
3-Hexyne
H3C-CH2-CŁC-CH2-CH3
I.B-1
7006-35-1
0
1
0
Histidine
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVII.A-4
71-00-1
0
1
0
L-Histidine
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVII.A-4 NH2
N HN
332-80-9
1
1
1
L-Histidine, 1-methyl-
COOH
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVII.A-4
1
1
1
L-Histidine, 3-methyl-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVII.A-4
62504-27-2
0
1
0
L-Histidine, N-(1-carboxyethyl)-, (R)-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVII.A-4
7440-60-0
1
1
1
Holmium
8064-26-4
0
1
0
Holocellulose
454-29-5
0
1
0
DL-Homocysteine
HS-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVIII.A-1
498-19-1 672-15-1
1
1
1
Homoserine
HO-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVIII.A-1
Ho
XX-5 VIII-3
{2-amino-4-hydroxybutanoic acid}
1415-93-6
0
1
0
Humic acids
IV.A-3
9024-25-3
0
1
0
Hydratase, aconitate
XXII-2
9032-88-6
0
1
0
Hydratase, fumarate
XXII-2
9014-08-8
0
1
0
Hydratase, phosphopyruvate
302-01-2
1
1
1
Hydrazine
XXII-2 H2N-NH2
XII-2
57-14-7
1
1
1
Hydrazine, 1,1-dimethyl-
H2N-N(CH3)2
XII-2
624-80-6
1
0
0
Hydrazine, ethyl-
H2N-NH-CH2-CH3
XII-2
60-34-4
1
0
0
Hydrazine, methyl-
74-90-8
1
1
1
Hydrocyanic acid
H2N-NH-CH3 {hydrogen cyanide}
HCN
XII-2 XI-2, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1638
11/24/08 1:56:36 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1639
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1333-74-0
1
0
0
Hydrogen
H2
XIX-5
7722-84-1
1
0
0
Hydrogen peroxide
H2O2
XXVII
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Hydrogen peroxyl radical
OOH
XXVII-1
7783-06-4
1
0
0
Hydrogen sulfide
H2S
XVIII.A-1
9027-05-8
0
1
0
Hydrogenase
XXII-2
9027-41-2
0
1
0
Hydrolase
XXII-2
0
1
0
Hydropectin
1
0
0
Hydroquinone/semiquinone/quinone free radical
XXVII-1
3352-57-6
1
0
0
Hydroxide free radical
XXVII-1
120598-69-8
0
1
0
Hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, putrescine
XXII-2
0
1
0
Hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, quinate
XXII-2
VIII-3
73904-44-6
0
1
0
Hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, shikimate
XXII-2
128909-19-3
0
1
0
Hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, tyramine
XXII-2
60321-02-0
0
1
0
Hydroxycinnamyl-CoA:quinate hydroxycinnamyl transferase, quinate
XXII-2
7803-49-8
0
1
0
Hydroxylamine
0
1
0
Hydroxylase, cinnamete
HO-NH2
XII-2 XXII-2
0
1
0
Hydroxylase, glycine
XXII-2
9029-83-8
0
1
0
Hydroxymethyltransferase, serine
XXII-2
105827-78-9
0
1
0
1H-Imidazol-2-amine, ((6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl)4,5-dihydro-N-nitro{Admire®}
NH-NO2 N
N
XVII.B-4, XXI-3
N
Cl
288-32-4
1
1
1
1H-Imidazole
{1,3-diazole}
1
5 4
2466-76-4
XVII.A-4
H N 2
N
3
0
1
0
1H-Imidazole, 1-acetyl-
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, C3-alkyl-
{3 isomers detected}
XVII.A-4
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, C4-alkyl-
{5 isomers detected}
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, C5-alkyl-
{4 isomers detected}
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, butyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-butyl-
XVII.A-4
0
1
0
1H-Imidazole, 4,5-dihydro-2-ethyl-4-methyl-
XVII.A-4
1739-84-0
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,2-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
6338-45-0
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
10447-93-5
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
930-62-1
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
2302-39-8
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
37455-73-5
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,4-dimethyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
40688-28-6
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2,4-dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2,5-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,4-dimethyl-5-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
1131-16-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1639
11/24/08 1:56:37 PM
1640
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
51-45-6
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1H-Imidazole-4-ethanamine
1
3
7098-07-9
XII-2, XVII.A-4
H N 2
Chapter Table
5
N CH2CH2-NH2
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, ethyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1-ethyl-
XVII.A-4
1072-62-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-ethyl-
XVII.A-4
19141-85-6
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-ethyl-
XVII.A-4
21202-52-8
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-
XVII.A-4
931-36-2
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-ethyl-4-methyl-
XVII.A-4
29239-89-2
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-ethyl-2-methyl-
XVII.A-4
37455-59-7
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-ethyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
37455-56-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-ethyl-2-propyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, methyl-
XVII.A-4
616-47-7
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1-methyl-
XVII.A-4
693-98-1
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-methyl-
XVII.A-4
822-36-6
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-methyl-
XVII.A-4
36947-68-9
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
58650-48-9
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
22509-02-0
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
37455-52-0
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
37455-58-6
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
61893-07-0
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-methyl-2-(1-methylpropyl)-
XVII.A-4
61893-06-9
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2-(1-methylpropyl)-
XVII.A-4
61893-08-1
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 4-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, pentyl-
XVII.A-4
91491-09-7
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, propyl-
XVII.A-4
1842-63-3
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,2,4-trimethyl-
XVII.A-4
822-90-2
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 2,4,5-trimethyl-
XVII.A-4
20185-22-2
1
0
0
1H-Imidazole, 1,4,5-trimethyl-
XVII.A-4
36734-19-7
0
1
0
1-Imidazolidinecarboxamide, 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)2,4-dioxo{Iprodione®}
XIII-1, XIV-1, XVII.A-4, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 O
N
N
461-72-3
1
0
0
2,4-Imidazolidinedione
{hydantoin}
H N
N
O
O
O
Cl
Cl
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
NH O
61893-10-5
1
0
0
2,4-Imidazolidinedione, 1-(1-methylethyl)-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
17374-27-5
1
0
0
2,4-Imidazolidinedione, 1,5-dimethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
61893-09-2
1
0
0
2,4-Imidazolidinedione, 1-ethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
16935-34-5
1
0
0
2,4-Imidazolidinedione, 5-(1-methylethyl)-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
15414-82-1
1
0
0
2,4-Imidazolidinedione, 5-ethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1640
11/24/08 1:56:37 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1641
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
616-03-5
1
1
1
2,4-Imidazolidinedione, 5-methyl-
96-45-7
1
0
0
2-Imidazolidinethione
138261-41-3
1
1
1
Imidazolidinimine, 1-((6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl)N-nitro{Imidacloprid®}
61892-75-9
1
0
0
4H-Imidazol-4-one, 1,5-dihydro-1-methyl-
60-27-5
0
1
0
4H-Imidazol-4-one, 2-amino-1,5-dihydro-1-methyl{creatinine}
Selected structures
Chapter Table XIV-1, XVII.A-4
{ethylenethiourea}
XVII.A-4 XVII.A-4, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XVII.A-4 XII-2, XVII.A-4
O 5 4
1
3N
N
CH3
2
NH2
274-76-0
1
0
0
Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine
XVII.E-6
1
N
N 2
1
0
0
3
Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine, C2-alkyl-
875-80-9
1
0
0
Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine, 2,3-dimethyl-
105650-23-5
1
0
0
1H-Imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-amine, 1-methyl-6phenyl{PhIP}
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6 N 4
5 6
XVII.F-8
N 3 1 N
2
NH2
CH3
68175-07-5
1
0
0
1H-Imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, methyl-
1
0
0
1H-Imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6 N 5 6
N
4 7
XVII.E-6
3
1
2
N H
27582-20-3
1
0
0
1H-Imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, 7-methyl-
XVII.E-6
120293-52-9
0
1
0
1H-Imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-4-propanoic acid, 4,6dicarboxy-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-, (4R-cis)-
IV.A-3
77094-11-2
1
0
0
3H-Imidazo[4,5-f]quinolin-2-amine, 3,4-dimethyl{MeIQ}
2
1
3N
N
76180-96-6
1
0
0
3H-Imidazo[4,5-f]quinolin-2-amine, 3-methyl{IQ}
0
0
1H-Indazole
XVII.F-8
NH2 N
2
3N
CH3
4
N
1
CH3
CH3
1
271-44-3
XVII.F-8
NH2 N
XVII.E-6
H N
1
2
N 3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1641
11/24/08 1:56:38 PM
1642
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
34879-87-3
0
1
0
1H-Indazole, 1,6-dimethyl-
95-13-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene
Selected structures
XVII.E-6 7
1
4
3
6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, diethyl-
496-11-7
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-
I.E-6 2
5
71278-05-2
Chapter Table
I.E-6 {indane}
7 6
I.E-6
1 2
5 4
3
53563-67-0
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydrodimethyl{4 isomers detected}
I.E-6
17057-82-8
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1,2-dimethyl-
I.E-6
71278-02-9
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydroethyl-
I.E-6
27133-93-3
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydromethyl{4 isomers detected}
I.E-6
767-58-8
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-1-methyl-
I.E-6
824-63-5
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-2-methyl-
I.E-6
824-22-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-4-methyl-
I.E-6
874-35-1
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-
I.E-6
16204-57-2
0
1
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro 1,1,4,5-tetramethyl-
I.E-6
942-43-8
0
1
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydro 1,1,5,6-tetramethyl-
I.E-6
36541-18-1
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2,3-dihydrotrimethyl-
I.E-6
29348-63-8
1
0
0
1H-Indene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
71278-06-3
1
0
0
1H-Indene, dimethylethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 5,6-dimethyl-2-phenyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2-(3’,4’-dimethylphenyl)-
I.E-6
58924-35-9 71278-07-4
1
0
0
1H-Indene, ethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, ethylpentamethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, heptamethyl-
I.E-6
71278-08-5
1
0
0
1H-Indene, hexamethyl-
I.E-6
29036-25-7
1
0
0
1H-Indene, methyl{at least 3 isomers are present in MSS}
I.E-6
767-59-9
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
2177-47-1
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
767-60-2
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
2471-84-3
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 1-methylene-
I.E-6
6596-86-7
1
0
0
2H-Indene, 2-methylene-
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 4-methyl-2-(2’-methylphenyl)-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 5-methyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 6-methyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 7-methyl-2-(2’-methylphenyl)-
I.E-6
{benzofulvene}
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1642
11/24/08 1:56:38 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1643
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
71278-09-6 38638-41-4
S
T
S T
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 7-(4’-methylphenyl)-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, pentamethyl-
I.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
1H-Indene, phenyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, 2-phenyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indene, phenyltrimethyl-
I.E-6
27135-78-0
1
0
0
1H-Indene, tetramethyl{at least 4 isomers present in MSS}
I.E-6
60826-61-1
1
0
0
1H-Indene, trimethyl{at least 3 isomers present in MSS}
I.E-6
37414-44-1
1
0
0
1H-Indene-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,3-dihydro-
III-12
30084-91-4
1
0
0
1H-Indene-5-carboxaldehyde, 2,3-dihydro-
III-12
606-23-5
1
0
0
1H-Indene-1,3(2H)-dione
668-30-4
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3,4-defg]chrysene
III-13 I.E-6
{also known as indeno[3,2,1,7-defg]chrysene; dibenzo[b,mno]fluoranthene; naphtho[1,2,3,4ghi]fluoranthene}
71277-94-6
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3,4-defg]chrysene, methyl{indeno[3,2,1,7-defg]chrysene, methyl-; dibenzo[b,mno]fluoranthene, methyl-; naphtho[1,2,3,4-ghi]fluoranthene, methyl-}
I.E-6
193-43-1
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]fluoranthene
I.E-6
41699-07-4
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]fluoranthene, methyl-
206-56-4
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-ij]isoquinoline
I.E-6 XVII.E-6
N
{1-azafluoranthene}
56631-57-3
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-ij]isoquinoline, dimethyl-
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-ij]isoquinoline, methyl-
1
0
0
1H-Indenol [1H-Inden-4-ol]
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6 IX.A-22
OH 3
5
2
6 7
1
72692-86-5
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, 2,3-dihydromethyl[1H-Inden-4-ol, 2,3-dihydromethyl-]
IX.A-22
73850-11-0
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, dimethyl[1H-Inden-4-ol, dimethyl-
IX.A-22
73850-20-1
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, ethylmethyl[1H-Inden-4-ol, ethylmethyl-]
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, methyl[1H-Inden-4-ol, methyl-]
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, tetramethyl[1H-Inden-4-ol, tetramethyl-]
IX.A-22
73850-09-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1643
11/24/08 1:56:38 PM
1644
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
73850-10-9
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, trimethyl[1H-Inden-4-ol, trimethyl-]
IX.A-22
1641-41-4
1
0
0
1H-Indenol, 2,3-dihydro[1H-Inden-4-ol, 2,3-dihydro-]
IX.A-22
1470-94-6
1
0
0
1H-Inden-5-ol, 2,3-dihydro-
IX.A-22
30286-23-8
1
0
0
Indenone, dihydro-
72692-87-6
1
0
0
Indenone, 1,3(or 2,3)-dihydrodimethyl-
III-13
480-90-0
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one
III-13
83-33-0
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
III-13
III-13
4
{1-indanone}
5
3 2 1
6 7
O
71278-03-0
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydrodimethyl{6 isomers detected}
III-13
66309-83-9
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-
III-13
17714-57-7
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dimethyl-
III-13
5037-60-5
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-4,7-dimethyl-
III-13
71278-04-1
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-ethyl-
III-13
57878-30-5
0
1
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-3-methyl-
III-13
72692-69-4
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro(methoxymethyl)-
III-13
65436-86-4
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydromethyl{4 isomers detected}
III-13
17496-14-9
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-2-methyl-
III-13
6072-57-7
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-
III-13
24644-78-8
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-4-methyl-
III-13
4593-38-8
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-
III-13
24623-20-9
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-6-methyl-
III-13
66288-51-5
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydrotrimethyl{3 isomers detected}
III-13
54789-23-0
1
1
1
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,3,5,7-tetramethyl-
III-13
35322-84-0
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,4,7-trimethyl-
III-13
22303-81-7
1
0
0
1H-Inden-1-one, 3-methyl-
III-13
615-13-4
1
0
0
2H-Inden-2-one, 1,3-dihydro-
III-13
1
0
0
2H-Inden-2-one, dimethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
2H-Inden-2-one, methyl-
0
1
0
2H-Inden-2-one, 1,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-1-hydroxy1,4,4,7a-tetramethyl-
39815-71-9
III-13 5 6
4
3
1
0
0
11H-Indeno[2,1-a]phenanthrene {11H-naphtho[2,1-a]fluorene}
2
1
7
H3C
220-97-3
II.A-5, III-13
CH3
H3 C
O OH
CH3
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1644
11/24/08 1:56:39 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1645
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
193-39-5
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
{o-phenylenepyrene}
I.E-6
64158-99-2
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dimethyl{at least 2 isomers present in MSS}
I.E-6
64158-98-1
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, methyl{at least 2 isomers present in MSS}
I.E-6
1
0
0
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, trimethyl{at least 2 isomers present in MSS}
I.E-6
1
0
0
5H-Indeno[1,2-b]pyridine
244-99-5
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
{4-azafluorene}
5
Chapter Table
XVII.E-6
4 3
N
2
1
1
0
0
5H-Indeno[1,2-b]pyridine, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
5H-Indeno[1,2-b]pyridine, methyl-
XVII.E-6
7440-74-6
1
1
1
Indium
120-72-9
1
1
1
1H-Indole
In {2,3-benzopyrrole}
XX-5 7
6
XVII.E-6
H N 2
5 4
3
1
0
0
1H-Indole, alkyl-
XVII.E-6
5192-03-0
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 5-amino-
XVII.E-6
55191-12-3
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,3-dibutyl-
496-15-1
0
1
0
1H-Indole, 2,3-dihydro-
XVII.E-6 {indoline}
XVII.E-6
6872-06-6
0
1
0
1H-Indole, 2,3-dihydro-2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
78210-52-3
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 2,3-dihydro-3-(3-pyridinylmethyl)-
XVII.E-6
29930-57-2
1
0
0
1H-Indole, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
875-79-6
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,2-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
875-30-9
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,3-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
27816-52-0
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,4-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
27816-53-1
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,5-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
5621-15-8
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,6-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
5621-16-9
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,7-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
91-55-4
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 2,3-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1196-79-8
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
5621-14-7
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 3,7-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-47-9
1
0
0
1H-Indole, dimethylethyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-49-1
1
0
0
1H-Indole, dimethylpropyl-
XVII.E-6
97542-81-9
1
0
0
1H-Indole, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
10604-59-8
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
3484-18-2
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 2-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
1484-19-1
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 3-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
68742-28-9
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 5-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1645
11/24/08 1:56:39 PM
1646
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
64844-45-7
1
0
0
1H-Indole, ethylmethyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-50-4
1
0
0
1H-Indole, ethylpropyl-
XVII.E-6
27323-28-0
1
1
1
1H-Indole, methyl-
XVII.E-6
603-76-9
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1-methyl-
XVII.E-6
95-20-5
1
1
1
1H-Indole, 2-methyl-
83-34-1
1
1
1
1H-Indole, 3-methyl-
16096-32-5
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 4-methyl-
XVII.E-6
614-96-0
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 5-methyl-
XVII.E-6
3420-02-8
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 6-methyl-
XVII.E-6
933-67-5
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 7-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indole, (1-methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indole, methylphenyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Indole, methylpropyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-46-8
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XVII.E-6 {skatole}
XVII.E-6
948-65-2
1
1
1
1H-Indole, 2-phenyl-
XVII.E-6
1504-16-1
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 3-phenyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-44-6
1
0
0
1H-Indole, propyl-
XVII.E-6
1859-92-3
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 3-propyl-
XVII.E-6
64844-48-0
1
0
0
1H-Indole, tetramethyl-
XVII.E-6
30642-36-5
1
0
0
1H-Indole, trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1971-46-6
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 1,2,3-trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
21296-92-4
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 2,3,5-trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
54340-99-7
1
0
0
1H-Indole, 5,6,7-trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
31212-21-2
0
1
0
1H-Indoleacetamide
XIII-1
32536-43-9
0
1
0
1H-Indoleacetic acid
IV.A-3
0
1
0
1H-Indole-2-acetonitrile, 1-methyl-
87-51-4
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-acetic acid
1912-33-0
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-acetic acid, methyl ester
V-3
771-51-7
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-acetonitrile
XI-2
133-32-4
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-butanoic acid
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-butanoic acid, methyl ester
487-89-8
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-carboxaldehyde
771-50-6
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-carboxylic acid
942-24-5
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-carboxylic acid, methyl ester
XI-2 IV.A-3, XXI-3
IV.A-3, XXI-3 V-3 III-12 IV.A-3 7 6
V-3
H N 2
5 4
COO-CH3
61-54-1
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-ethanamine
XII-2
526-55-6
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-ethanol
II.A-5 IV.A-3
830-96-6
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-propanoic acid
5548-09-4
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-propanoic acid, methyl ester
35656-49-6
0
1
0
1H-Indolepropanoic acid, D-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
392-12-1
0
1
0
1H-Indole-3-propanoic acid, D-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1646
11/24/08 1:56:40 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1647
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1761-10-0
0
1
0
Indolizine, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1761-11-1
1
0
0
Indolizine, 6-methyl-
XVII.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
N
54906-44-4
1
1
1
8(5H)-Indolizinone, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro{5-oxocyclohexa[a]pyrrole}
III-13
O
N
55041-88-8
0
1
0
8(5H)-Indolizinone, 6,7-dihydro-2-methyl-
50-67-9
0
1
0
1H-Indol-5-ol, 3-(2-aminoethyl)-
59-48-3
1
0
0
2H-Indol-2-one, 1,3-dihydro{phthalimidine; oxindole}
15379-45-0
III-13 XII-2 XVII.C-1 O N H
1
0
0
2H-Indol-2-one, 1,3-dihydro-3-ethyl-
XVII.C-1
1
0
0
2H-Indol-2-one, 1,3-dihydro-3-methyl-
XVII.C-1
20200-86-6
0
1
0
2H-Indol-2-one, 1,3-dihydro-1,3,3-trimethyl-
58074-25-2
0
1
0
3H-Indol-3-one, 2,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro{4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-3-indolinone}
XVII.C-1 O
III-13
N H
6917-35-7
1
1
1
Inositol
87-89-8
1
1
1
myo-Inositol
II.A-5 II.A-5
OH HO
OH
OH
HO OH
3615-82-5
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, hexakis(dihydrogen phosphate), calcium magnesium salt
XX-6
71608-14-5
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxodocosyl)amino]octadecyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-17-8
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-1[(2-hydroxy-1-oxopentacosyl)amino]octadecyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-15-6
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxotricosyl)amino]octadecyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-16-7
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxotetracosyl)amino]octadecyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1647
11/24/08 1:56:40 PM
1648
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
71608-19-0
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxodocosyl)amino]-8-octadecenyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-20-3
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxotricosyl)amino]-8-octadecenyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-21-4
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxotetracosyl)amino]-8-octadecenyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-22-5
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxopentacosyl)amino]-8octadecenyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
71608-23-6
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-D-Dglucopyranosyl-(1o4)-O-alpha-Dglucopyranuronosyl-(1o2)-, 1-[3,4-dihydroxy-2[(2-hydroxy-1-oxohexacosyl)amino]-8-octadecenyl hydrogen phosphate], disodium salt
XX-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
89194-80-9
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, O-D-glucopyranosyl-
II.A-5
49741-70-0
0
1
0
D-myo-Inositol, O-D-glucopyranosyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
myo-Inositol, phosphatidyl-
0
1
0
Iodide
20461-54-5
II.A-5 I
-1
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
7553-56-2
1
1
1
Iodine
I2
XVIII.B-3, XX-5
7439-88-5
1
1
1
Iridium
Ir
XX-5
7439-89-6
1
1
1
Iron
Fe
XX-5
15281-98-8
1
0
0
Iron carbonyl
Fe(CO)4
XX-6
15438-31-0
0
1
0
Iron, ion
Fe
XX-5
1332-37-2
0
1
0
Iron oxide
Fe2O3
XX-6
14596-12-4
1
1
1
Iron, isotope of mass 59
59
14484-64-1
0
1
0
Iron, tris(dimethylcarbamodithioato-S,S')-, (OC-611){Ferbam®}
+2
Fe
XX-5
-
S
H3C N
S-
H3C
0
1
0
1,3-Isobenzofurandione
Fe3+
-3
-
85-44-9
XXI-3
-
{phthalic anhydride}
VII-1
O
O
O
56-25-7
0
1
0
1,3-Isobenzofurandione, 3a,7a-dimethyl-4,7-epoxyhexahydro {cantharidin}
O
O
VII-1
O
O
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1648
11/24/08 1:56:41 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1649
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
87-41-2
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone
{phthalide}
Selected structures
Chapter Table VI-3
O
O
1
0
0
1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, methyl-
VI-3
551-08-6
0
1
0
1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3-butylidene-
VI-3
13277-77-5
0
1
0
1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3,7-dihydroxy-3,4,5,6tetramethyl-
VI-3
66309-76-0
1
0
0
1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-
VI-3
75-13-8
0
1
0
Isocyanic acid
52845-07-5
1
0
0
Isoeicosane
H-N=C=O
I.A-10
XIX-5
52655-10-4
0
1
0
Isoeicosanol
II.A-5
52845-08-6
1
0
0
Isoheneicosane
I.A-10
54365-40-1
1
1
1
Isoheptacosane
85-41-6
1
0
0
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione
I.A-10 {phthalimide}
XIV-1
O
NH
O
66309-86-2
1
0
0
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, 4,5-dimethyl-
XIV-1
1
0
0
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, methyl-
XIV-1
7251-82-3
1
0
0
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, 4-methyl-
XIV-1
40314-06-5
1
0
0
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, 5-methyl-
133-06-2
1
1
1
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, 3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-2[(trichloromethyl)thio]{Captan®}
XIV-1 XIV-1, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 O
N
S-CCl3
O
133-07-3
0
1
0
1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, 2[(trichloromethyl)thio]-
{Folpan®}
XIV-1, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 O
N
S-CCl3
O
480-91-1
1
0
0
1H-Isoindol-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-
XIV-1
6091-76-5
1
0
0
1H-Isoindol-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-3-methyl-
XIV-1
7004-09-3
0
1
0
Isoleucine
1509-34-8
0
1
0
Isoleucine, allo-
73-32-5
0
1
0
L-Isoleucine
139681-66-6
0
1
0
L-Isoleucine, N-[N-[N-(N-L-methionyl-L-valyl)-Lphenylalanyl]-L-leucyl]-
80449-01-0
0
1
0
Isomerase, deoxyribonucleate topo-
XXII-2
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XVIII.A-1
9001-41-6
0
1
0
Isomerase, glucose phosphate
XXII-2
9055-95-2
0
1
0
Isomerase, pentose phosphate
XXII-2
9023-83-0
0
1
0
Isomerase, ribose phosphate
XXII-2
52701-70-9
0
1
0
Isopentacosane
I.A-10
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1649
11/24/08 1:56:41 PM
1650
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 27836-87-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Isopentadecanoic acid
IV.A-3
0
1
0
Isoperoxidase A3
XXII-2
1
0
0
Isoquinolinamine
XII-2
1532-84-9
1
0
0
1-Isoquinolinamine
XII-2
119-65-3
1
1
1
Isoquinoline
64828-50-8
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, butyl-
XVII.E-6
7661-38-3
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, 1-butyl-
XVII.E-6
64973-79-1
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, dihydro-
XVII.E-6
65312-77-8
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, dihydroethyl-
XVII.E-6
65312-79-0
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, dihydromethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
64828-51-9
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
61010-32-0
0
1
0
Isoquinoline, 1-[(4-methoxy-3-nitrophenyl)methyl]-, mononitrate
XVII.E-6
58853-80-8
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, methyl{several methylquinolines detected in MSS}
XVII.E-6
1721-93-3
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, 1-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1125-80-0
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
64828-49-5
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, (1-methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, methyltetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
64849-98-5
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, propyl-
XVII.E-6
29832-78-8
1
0
0
Isoquinoline, tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
64849-99-6
1
0
0
Isoquinolinecarbonitrile
1198-30-7
55713-38-7
XI-2
1
0
0
1-Isoquinolinecarbonitrile
0
1
0
5,6-Isoquinolinedione, 7,8-dihydro-1,3,7,7tetramethyl-
XI-2
0
1
0
8(5H)-Isoquinolinone, 6,7-dihydro-1,3,6,6tetramethyl- [6,7-dihydro- or 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-?]
III-13 CH3 N
CH3
H3C
27137-10-6
1
0
0
Isotetradecanoic acid, methyl ester
556-61-6
0
1
0
Isothiocyanic acid, methyl-
CH3
V-3 {Trapex®}
288-16-4
1
0
0
Isothiazole
34425-19-9
1
0
0
Isotriacontane
288-14-2
0
1
0
Isoxazole
300-87-8
0
1
0
Isoxazole, 3,5-dimethyl-
10557-82-1
1
0
0
Isoxazole, trimethyl- = Isoxazole, 3,4,5-trimethyl-
H 3C-N=S
0
1
0
3-Isoxazolidinone 2-((2-chlorophenyl)methyl)-4,4dimethyl{Clomazone®}
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 XVIII.A-1 I.A-10 XVII.D-2 XVII.D-2 CH3
H3C
XVII.D-2
N
H3C
81777-89-1
III-13
O
O Cl
O N O
XVII.D-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1650
11/24/08 1:56:42 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1651
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9013-02-9
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), adenylate
XXII-2
9012-50-4
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), aspartate
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
9026-67-9
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), choline
XXII-2
9001-36-9
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), gluco-
XXII-2
9026-62-4
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), glucurono-
XXII-2
9001-51-8
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), hexo-
XXII-2
9032-66-0
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
XXII-2
9001-80-3
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), phosphofructo-
XXII-2
9032-96-6
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), phosphogluco-
XXII-2
150656-38-5
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), protein (tobacco BY-2 cell isoenzyme ZmPK1 reduced)
XXII-2
9001-59-6
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), pyruvate
XXII-2
9027-40-1
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), pyruvate-phosphate di-
XXII-2
9030-57-3
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), ribulo-
XXII-2
9031-51-0
0
1
0
Kinase (phosphorylating), shikimate
XXII-2
63-42-3
0
1
0
Lactose
79-62-9
0
1
0
Lanost-8-en-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
6890-88-6
0
1
0
Lanost-8-en-3-ol, 24-methylene-, (3E)-
II.B-2 II.B-2
II.A-5, VIII-3
26409-08-5
0
1
0
Lanost-9(11)-en-3-ol, 24,25-epoxy-, (3E)-
79-63-0
0
1
0
Lanosta-8,24-dien-3-ol, (3E)-
{lanosterol}
CH3 CH3
H3C
CH3 CH3
HO H3C
CH3
II.B-2 67493-77-0
0
1
0
II.B-2, V-3
70898-27-0
0
1
0
Lanostane-3,7-diol, (3E,7E)-
7439-91-0
1
1
1
Lanthanum
La
XX-5
13981-28-7
1
1
1
Lanthanum, isotope of mass 140
140
XX-5
7439-92-1
1
1
1
Lead
Pb
XX-5
14255-04-0
1
1
1
Lead, isotope of mass 210
210
XX-5 XX-5
Lanostane-3,7,11-triol, 3,7-diacetate, (3E,7E,11E)-
II.B-2 La Pb
15092-94-1
0
1
0
Lead, isotope of mass 212
212
15067-28-4
0
1
0
Lead, isotope of mass 214
214
XX-5
218
XX-5
Pb Pb
0
1
0
Lead, isotope of mass 218
0
1
0
Lecithins
Pb
7005-03-0
1
1
1
Leucine
61-90-5
0
1
0
L-Leucine
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
139681-65-5
0
1
0
L-Leucine, N-[N-[N-[N-[N-[N-[N-(N-L-methionyl-Lphenylalanyl)-L-seryl]-L-leucyl]-L-leucyl]-Lmethionyl]-L-valyl]-L-valyl]-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
9005-53-2
0
1
0
Lignin
XII-2 (H3C)2=CH-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
VIII-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1651
11/24/08 1:56:42 PM
1652
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
8068-04-0
0
1
0
Lignin, Klason
VIII-3
8068-00-6
0
1
0
Lignin, milled wood
VIII-3
9001-62-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Lipase, triacylglycerol
XXII-2
0
1
0
Lipoxygenase
XXII-2
7439-93-2
1
1
1
Lithium
Li
17341-24-1
0
1
0
Lithium, ion
Li
545-47-1
0
1
0
Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, (3E)-
XX-5 +1
XX-5
HO
7439-94-3
1
1
1
Lutecium
9045-78-7
0
1
0
Lyase, isocitrate
9015-75-2
0
1
0
Lyase, pectate
6899-06-5
0
1
0
Lysine
28902-93-4
0
1
0
Lysine, hydroxy-
56-87-1
0
1
0
L-Lysine
1114-34-7
0
1
0
Lyxose
II.B-2
Lu
XX-5 XXII-2 XXII-2
H2N-(CH2)4-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 H2N-(CH2)4-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7 O OH OH
II.A-5, X-2
OH
HO
90803-60-4
0
1
0
M-1nkh
XXII-2
14428-12-7
0
1
0
Magnesate(1-), [9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-13-formyl-21(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,18-trimethyl-20-oxo-3phorbinepropanoato(3-)-N23,N24,N25,N26]-, hydrogen, [SP-4-2-[3S-(3D,4E,21E)]]{chlorophyllide b}
XX-6
14897-06-4
0
1
0
Magnesate(1-), [9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-21(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,13,18-tetramethyl-20-oxo3-phorbinepropanoato(3-)-N23,N24,N25,N26]-, hydrogen, [SP-4-2-[3S-(3D,4E,21E)]]{chlorophyllide a}
XX-6
15611-43-5
0
1
0
Magnesate(3-), [18-carboxy-20-(carboxymethyl)-8ethenyl-13-ethyl-2,3-dihydro-3,7,12, 17tetramethyl-21H,23H-porphine-2-propanoato(5-)N21,N22,N23,N24]-, trihydrogen, [SP-4-2-(2Strans)]{chlorophyllin}
XX-6
7439-95-4
1
1
1
Magnesium
Mg
XX-5 +2
XX-5 XX-6
22537-22-0
0
1
0
Magnesium, ion
Mg
1309-48-4
0
1
0
Magnesium oxide
MgO
479-61-8 42617-16-3
0
1
0
Magnesium, [3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-21-(methoxycarbonyl)4,8,13,18-tetramethyl-20-oxo-3phorbinepropanoato(2-)-N23,N24,N25,N26]-, [SP4-2-[3S-[3D(2E,7S*,11S*),4E,21E]]]{chlorophyll a}
XX-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1652
11/24/08 1:56:43 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1653
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
519-62-0
0
1
0
Magnesium, [3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-13-formyl-21(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,18-trimethyl-20-oxo-3phorbinepropanoato(2-)-N23,N24,N25,N26]-, [SP4-2-[3S-[3D(2E,7S*,11S*),4E,21E]]]{chlorophyll b}
0
1
0
Maltase
0
1
0
Į-Maltose
69-79-4
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XX-6
XXII-2 CH2OH
CH2OH
O
O
OH
OH
II.A-5, VIII-3
OH
O OH OH
0
1
0
ȕ-Maltose
7439-96-5
1
1
1
Manganese
Mn
13446-35-0
0
1
0
Manganese chloride
MnCl4
12427-38-2
0
1
0
Manganese, [[1,2ethanediylbis[carbamodithioato]](2-)]- {Maneb®}
OH
II.A-5 XX-5 XX-6
S-
S-
S
S HN
8018-01-7
0
1
0
Manganese, [[1,2-ethanediylbis[carbamodithioato]](2-)] + zinc, [[1,2-ethanediylbis[carbamodithioato]](2-)] {Mancozeb}
NH
Maneb +
0
1
0
XVIII.A-1, XX-6, XXI-3
Zn2+ S-
S-
S
S HN
16397-91-4
XVIII.A-1, XX-6, XXI-3
Mn2+
NH
+2
Manganese, ion
Mn 56
XX-5
HOCH2-(CHOH)4-CH2OH
II.A-5
14681-52-8
0
1
0
Manganese, isotope of mass 56
69-65-8
1
1
1
D-Mannitol
31103-86-3
1
1
1
Mannose
XX-5
Mn
{cordycepic acid}
II.A-5 VIII-3
CH2OH O OH OH HO
3458-28-4
1
1
1
D-Mannose
14307-02-9
0
1
0
D-Mannose, 2-amino-2-deoxy-
3615-41-6
1
1
1
L-Mannose, 6-deoxy-
OH
{seminose}
II.A-5, VIII-3
{mannosamine}
II.A-5, XII-2
{D-rhamnose}
HO
O
II.A-5, VIII-3
OH
CH3
OH OH
9025-42-7
0
1
0
Mannosidase, D-
XXII-2
8049-97-6
0
1
0
Melanin
XXII-2
585-99-9
0
1
0
Melibiose
OH
CH2OH HO
HO
O OH
II.A-5, VIII-3
OH O OH
O OH
CH2
7439-97-6
1
1
1
Mercury
Hg
XX-5
13982-78-0
0
1
0
Mercury, isotope of mass 203
203
XX-5
9002-91-9
0
1
0
Metaldehyde
{acetaldehyde tetramer}
Hg
XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1653
11/24/08 1:56:43 PM
1654
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
74-89-5
1
1
1
Methanamine
{methylamine}
H3C-NH2
XII-2
75-50-3
1
1
1
Methanamine, N,N-dimethyl-
{trimethylamine}
(H3C)3ŁN
XII-2
{dimethylamine}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
124-40-3
1
1
1
Methanamine, N-methyl-
62-75-9
1
1
1
Methanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-
107-43-7
0
1
0
Methanaminium, 1-carboxy-N,N,N-trimethyl-, inner salt {betaine}
-
74-82-8
1
0
0
Methane
CH4
74-83-9
1
1
1
Methane, bromo{Brom-o-Gas®, Methogas®, Profume®, Terr-o-Gas®, Zytox®}
H3C-Br
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
74-87-3
1
0
0
Methane, chloro-
H3C-Cl
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
75-09-2
1
1
1
Methane, dichloro-
H2C=Cl2
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
75-71-8
1
0
0
Methane, dichlorodifluoro-
CF2Cl2
XVIII.B-3
H3C-I
XVIII.B-3
{NDMA}
(H3C)2=NH
Chapter Table
+
OOC-CH2-N Ł(CH3)3
74-88-4
1
0
0
Methane, iodo-
1
0
0
Methane, isocyanato-
75-52-5
1
0
0
Methane, nitro-
76-06-2
0
1
0
Methane, nitrotrichloro-
{Chloropicrin®}
Cl 3ŁC-NO2
{dimethyl ether}
H3C-O-CH3
H 3C-N=C=O
0
1
0
Methane, oxybis-
67-68-5
0
1
0
Methane, sulfinylbis-
75-18-3
1
1
1
Methane, thiobis-
67-66-3
1
1
1
Methane, trichloro-
75-69-4
1
1
1
Methane, trichlorofluoro-
37924-13-3
0
1
0
Methanesulfonamide, trifluoro-N-(2-methyl-4(phenylsulfonyl)phenyl){Perfluidone®}
XII-2
V-3
H3C-NO2
115-10-6
XII-2, XV-8
1.A-10
624-83-9
{methyl isocyanate}
XII-2
(H3C)2=N-NO(H3C)2=NH
XVI-1 XVI-1, XXI-3 X-2 XVIII.A-1
{methyl sulfide} {chloroform}
(H3C)2=S
XVIII.A-1
H-CŁCl3
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
F-CŁCl3
{methyl mercaptan}
XVIII.B-3
O
O
S
NH-S-CF3
O
O
H3C-SH
XXI-3
74-93-1
1
0
0
Methanethiol
XVIII.A-1
475-20-7
0
1
0
1,4-Methanoazulene, decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl-9methylene-, [1S-(1D,3aE,4D,8aE)]-
I.C-1
469-61-4
0
1
0
1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, 2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydro3,6,8,8-tetramethyl-, [3R-(3D,3aE,7E,8aD)]-
I.C-1
77-53-2
0
1
0
1H-3a,7-Methanoazulen-6-ol, octahydro-3,6,8,8tetramethyl-, [3R-(3D,3aE,6D,7E,8aD)]-
II.A-5
CH3
CH3
OH CH3 CH3
4586-22-5
0
1
0
4,8-Methanoazulen-9-ol, decahydro-2,2,4,8tetramethyl-, stereoisomer
II.A-5
17622-35-4
0
1
0
4,8-Methanoazulen-9-ol, decahydro-2,2,4,8tetramethyl-, acetate, stereoisomer
V-3
1031-07-8
1
1
1
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9ahexahydro-, 3,3-dioxide {Thiodan® sulfate; Endosulfan® sulfate}
115-29-7
1
1
1
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9ahexahydro-, 3-oxide {Thiodan®; Thiosulfan®; Endosulfan®}
Cl Cl Cl
CCl 2
O O
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
O S O
Cl Cl Cl Cl
CCl2
O O
S
O
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1654
11/24/08 1:56:44 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1655
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
33213-65-9
1
1
1
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9ahexahydro-, 3-oxide, (3D,5aD,6E,9E,9aD){ȕ-Endosulfan®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
959-98-8
1
1
1
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9ahexahydro-, 3-oxide, (3D,5aE,6D,9D,9aE){Į-Endosulfan®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
88125-11-5
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, 1a,2,3,4,7a,7b-hexahydro-1a,5,7b-trimethyl-, [1aS-(1aD,2E,4aE,7aD,7bD)]-
III-13
105300-09-2
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, 1a-[(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)methyl]octahydro-5,7bdimethyl-
III-13
125537-96-4
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, 3-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)octahydro-1a,5,7btrimethyl-, [1aS-(1aD,2E,3E,4aE,5D,7aD,7bD)]-
II.A-5, III-13
125537-95-3
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, 4-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)octahydro-1a,5,7btrimethyl-, [1aS-(1aD,2E,4E,4aE,5D,7aD,7bD)]-
II.A-5, III-13
105300-10-5
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, 5-[(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)methyl]octahydro1a,7b-dimethyl-, [1aS-(1aD,2E,4aE,5D,7aD,7bD)]-
II.A-5, III-13
88848-60-6
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, 6-[(2-O-E-D-glucopyranosyl-E-Dglucopyranosyl)oxy]octahydro-1a,5,7b-trimethyl-, [1aS-(1aD,2E,4aE,5D,6E,7aD,7bD )]-
II.A-5, III-13
68690-84-6
0
1
0
7H-2,4a-Methano-1H-cyclobuta[de]naphthalen-7one, octahydro-1a,5,7b-trimethyl-, [1aS(1aD,2E,4aE,5D,7aD,7bD)]-
76-44-8
1
1
1
4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro{Heptachlor®}
5103-71-9
0
1
0
4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro2,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro{Į-Chlordane®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
III-13
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
Cl
Cl Cl
CCl2
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl Cl
12789-03-6
0
1
0
4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro2,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro{Ȗ-Chlordane®}
1024-57-3
1
1
1
2,5-Methano-2H-indeno[1,2-b]oxirene, 2,3,4,5,6,7,7-heptachloro-1a,1b,5,5a,6,6ahexahydro-, (1aD,1bE,2D,5D,5aE,6E,6aD){Heptachlor® epoxide}
Cl
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
Cl CCl2 O
Cl Cl
297-78-9
1
1
1
4,7-Methanoisobenzofuran, 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro{Isobenzan®; Telodrin®}
Cl
Cl
Cl CCl2
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
O
Cl Cl
Cl
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1655
11/24/08 1:56:45 PM
1656
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
113-48-4
0
1
0
4,7-Methano-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione, 2-(2ethylhexyl)-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
67-56-1
1
1
1
Methanol
5293-97-0
1
1
1
Methanone, bis(2-chlorophenyl)-
90-98-2
1
0
0
Methanone, bis(4-chlorophenyl)-
Chapter Table
Selected structures
XIV-1, XXI-3
H3C-OH
II.A-5 III-13, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 III-13, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 O C
Cl
24966-13-0
1
0
0
Cl
Methanone, cyclopropyl-3-pyridinyl-
119-61-9
1
1
1
Methanone, diphenyl-
5162-03-8
0
1
0
Methanone, (2-chlorophenyl)phenyl-
{benzophenone}
2385-85-5
0
1
0
1,3,4-Metheno-1H-cyclobuta[cd])pentalene, 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6dodecachlorooctahydro{Mirex®}
III-13 C6H5-CO-C6H5
III-13 III-13, XVIII.B-3 XXI-3
7005-18-7
0
1
0
Methionine
63-68-3
0
1
0
L-Methionine
20236-97-9
0
1
0
D-Methionine, N-(carboxyacetyl)-
2143-68-2
1
0
0
Methoxy radical
CH3O
XXVII-1
2229-07-4
1
0
0
Methyl radical
CH3
XXVII-1
55285-14-8
0
1
0
Methylcarbamic acid, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-7benzofuranyl [(di-N-butylamino)thio] ester {Carbosulfan®}
2032-59-9
0
1
0
Methylcarbamic acid, 4-(dimethylamino)-3methylphenyl ester {Aminocarb®}
2032-65-7
0
1
0
Methylcarbamic acid, 3,5-dimethyl-4(methylthio)phenyl ester {Methiocarb®}
XVIII.A-1 H3C-S-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-COOH
XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1
(CH2)3-CH3
XXI-3
OOC-N(CH3)-S-N (CH2)3-CH3
O
(H3C)2N
OOC-NH-CH3
XXI-3
CH3
XXI-3
H3C-NH-COO
S
XXI-3
29973-13-5
0
1
0
Methylcarbamic acid, 2-((ethylthio)methyl)phenyl ester {Ethiofencarb®}
1822-74-8
1
0
0
Methyl ethenyl sulfide
50936-45-3
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, caffeate
XXII-2
H3C-NH-COO
H3C-S-CH=CH2-
S
XVIII.A-1
9012-25-3
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, catechol
XXII-2
152288-82-9
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, catechol (tobacco clone OMT3.4 isoenzyme II reduced)
XXII-2
9012-40-2
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, homocysteine
XXII-2
9027-77-4
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, methionine S-
XXII-2
9055-07-6
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, protein (arginine)
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1656
11/24/08 1:56:46 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1657
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9075-39-2
0
1
0
Methyltransferase, putrescine
7439-98-7
1
1
1
Molybdenum
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XXII-2
Mo
16065-87-5
0
1
0
Molybdenum, ion
110-91-8
0
1
0
Morpholine
Mo
110488-70-5
0
1
0
Morpholine, 3-(3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4dimethoxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl){Dimethomorph®; Acrobat®}
XX-5
+6
XX-5 X-2, XVII.D-2
147688-58-2
0
1
0
Morpholine, 2,2-dimethyl-
59-89-2
1
1
1
Morpholine, 4-nitroso-
70699-77-3
0
1
0
3-Morpholinepropanamide, 2-oxo-6-(1,2,3,4tetrahydroxybutyl)-, [3S-[3D,6D(1R*,2S*,3S*)]]-
X-2, XVII.D-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
X-2, XVII.D-2 {NMOR}
X-2, XV-8, XVII.D-2
X-2, XVII.D-2
9047-56-7
0
1
0
Mutase
92-24-0
1
0
0
Naphthacene
XXII-2 I.E-6
5385-22-8
1
0
0
Naphth[1,2-e]acephenanthrylene {dibenzo[b,j]fluoranthene}
I.E-6
28258-64-2
1
0
0
Naphthalenamine, N-phenyl-
XII-2
134-32-7
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenamine {naphthalene, 1-amino-; Į-naphthylamine}
XII-2
2246-44-8
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenamine, 2-methyl-
XII-2
91-59-8
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenamine {naphthalene, 2-amino-; ȕ-naphthylamine}
XII-2
10546-24-4
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenamine, 3-methyl-
135-88-6
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenamine, N-phenyl-
91-20-3
1
1
1
Naphthalene
XII-2 NH-C6H5
1
8
2
7
4
5
91-17-8
0
0
Naphthalene, alkyl-
1
0
0
Naphthalene, decahydro-
I.E-6 8 8a 4a 5
0
1
0
Naphthalene, decahydro-1,6-dimethyl-4-(1methylethyl){cadinene}
1
7 6
29350-73-0
I.E-6
3
6
1
XII-2
2
I.C-1
3 4
I.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1657
11/24/08 1:56:47 PM
1658
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
3242-05-5
0
1
0
Naphthalene, decahydro-1,8a-dimethyl-7-(1methylethyl)-, [1S- (1D,4aD,7D,8aD)]-
3738-00-9
0
1
0
Naphthalene, decahydro-1-ethoxido-2,5,5,8atetramethyl{ambroxan}
31831-35-3
0
1
0
Naphthalene, diethyl-
29828-28-2
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dihydro-
I.E-6
72692-88-7
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dihydrodimethyl{at least 4 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
39292-53-0
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dihydromethyl{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
2717-44-4
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1,2-dihydro-3-methyl-
I.E-6
4373-13-1
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1,2-dihydro-4-methyl-
I.E-6
67494-22-8
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 1,2-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(1methylethenyl)-
I.E-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, dihydrotrimethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
30364-38-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2-dihydro-1,1,6-trimethyl-
I.E-6
4506-36-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2-dihydro-1,5,8-trimethyl-
I.E-6
28804-88-8
1
1
1
Naphthalene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
573-98-8
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2-dimethyl-
I.E-6
575-41-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl-
I.E-6
571-58-4
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl-
I.E-6
571-61-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,5-dimethyl-
I.E-6
575-43-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl-
I.E-6
575-37-1
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl-
I.E-6
569-41-5
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,8-dimethyl-
I.E-6
581-40-8
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl-
I.E-6
581-42-0
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2,6-dimethyl-
I.E-6
582-16-1
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2,7-dimethyl-
I.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table I.C-1
O-
X-2
I.E-6
71630-68-7
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dimethyl-2-ethenyl-
I.E-6
65319-44-0
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dimethylethyl-
I.E-6
71607-89-1
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl-2-ethyl-
I.E-6
66309-90-8
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1,4-dimethyl- 5-ethyl-
I.E-6
483-76-1
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 4,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydro1-(1-methylethyl)-, (1S-cis)-
I.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1658
11/24/08 1:56:47 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1659
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
31983-22-9
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 4,7-dimethyl-1,2,4a,5,6,8ahexahydro-1-(1-methylethyl){Į-muurolene}
I.C-1
483-77-2
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl-4-(1-methylethyl)1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-, (1S-Z)-
I.E-6
4630-07-3
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 1,8a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro- [1R 1Į,7ȕ,8a Į] {valencene}
I.C-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
CH2 CH3
10219-75-7
0
1
0
CH3
CH3
I.C-1
Naphthalene, 1,8a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro- [1R 1Į,7 Į,8a Į] {eremophilene}
CH2 CH3
71607-60-8
Chapter Table
CH3
CH3
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dimethyl-2-phenyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dimethyltetrahydro{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
51855-29-9 65338-07-0
1
0
0
Naphthalene, dimethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro{at least 5 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
826-74-4
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1-ethenyl-
I.E-6
827-54-3
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 2-ethenyl-
I.E-6
64031-89-6
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 2-ethenylmethyl{at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
35737-86-1
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 2-ethenyl-1-methyl-
I.E-6
93-18-5
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 2-ethoxy-
X-2
27138-19-8
1
0
0
Naphthalene, ethyl-
I.E-6
1127-76-0
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-
I.E-6
939-27-5
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-
I.E-6
31391-42-1
1
0
0
Naphthalene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
17057-94-2
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-3-methyl-
I.E-6
17057-92-0
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-5-methyl-
I.E-6
31032-91-4
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-6-methyl-
I.E-6
31032-92-5
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-7-methyl-
I.E-6
61886-71-3
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-8-methyl-
I.E-6
31032-94-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-3-methyl-
I.E-6
17179-41-8
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-4-methyl{naphthalene, 3-ethyl-1-methyl-}
I.E-6
17059-53-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-5-methyl{naphthalene, 6-ethyl-1-methyl-}
I.E-6
7372-86-3
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-
I.E-6
17059-55-1
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-7-methyl-
I.E-6
{E-naphthyl ethyl ether}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1659
11/24/08 1:56:47 PM
1660
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
77242-78-5
1
0
0
Naphthalene, hexamethyl-
I.E-6
93-04-9
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 2-methoxy-
X-2
1321-94-4
1
1
1
Naphthalene, methyl-
I.E-6
90-12-0
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
91-57-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
29253-36-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, (1-methylethyl)-
I.E-6
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 2 (1-methylethyl)-
I.E-6
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 7-methyl-4-methylene-1-(1methylethyl)- 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8a-octahydro-, (1D,4aE,8aD){Ȗ-cadinene}
I.C-1
1
0
0
Naphthalene, methylphenyl-
I.E-6
71607-61-9
1
0
0
Naphthalene, methyl-2-phenyl-
I.E-6
34540-66-4
0
1
0
Naphthalene, methylpropyl-
I.E-6
39029-41-9
1680-58-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-(1-methylpropyl)-
I.E-6
16727-91-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-(2-methylpropyl)-
I.E-6
71607-57-3
1
1
1
Naphthalene, methyltetrahydro{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
31291-71-1
1
1
1
Naphthalene, methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
I.E-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
I.E-6
3877-19-8
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
I.E-6
2809-64-5
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 5-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
I.E-6
1680-51-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 6-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro{naphthalene, 2-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-}
I.E-6
86-57-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-nitro-
XVI-1
56908-81-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, pentamethyl-
I.E-6
605-02-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1-phenyl-
I.E-6
612-94-2
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2-phenyl-
I.E-6
71697-04-6
1
0
0
Naphthalene, phenyl-, monomethyl derivative
I.E-6
27378-74-1
0
1
0
Naphthalene, propyl-
I.E-6
2765-18-6
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1-propyl-
I.E-6
2027-19-2
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 2-propyl-
I.E-6
119-64-2
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
{tetralin}
I.E-6
121214-18-4
1
0
0
Naphthalene, tetrahydrotrimethyl{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
72843-02-8
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydrotrimethyl{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
475-03-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,1,6-trimethyl{Į-ionene}
I.E-6
21693-51-6
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,5,8-trimethyl-
I.E-6
30316-36-0
0
1
0
Naphthalene, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,6,8-trimethyl-
I.E-6
28652-74-6
1
1
1
Naphthalene, tetramethyl{at least 4 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1660
11/24/08 1:56:48 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1661
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
28652-77-9
1
1
1
Naphthalene, trimethyl{at least 10 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
2717-42-2
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethyl-
I.E-6
3031-05-8
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2,6-trimethyl-
I.E-6
486-34-0
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,2,7-trimethyl-
I.E-6
2131-39-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,3,5-trimethyl-
I.E-6
3031-08-1
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,3,6-trimethyl-
I.E-6
2131-41-1
1
0
0
Naphthalene, 1,4,5-trimethyl-
I.E-6
2131-42-2
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,4,6-trimethyl-
I.E-6
2245-38-7
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 1,6,7-trimethyl{naphthalene, 2,3,5-trimethyl-}
I.E-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
829-26-5
1
1
1
Naphthalene, 2,3,6-trimethyl-
68985-11-5
0
1
0
1-Naphthaleneacetaldehyde, 3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8aoctahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, (4aS-trans)-
3243-36-5
0
1
0
1-Naphthaleneacetaldehyde, decahydro-5,5,8atrimethyl-2-methylene-, [1S-(1D,4aE,8aD)]-
68982-27-4
0
1
0
Selected structures
Chapter Table
I.E-6 III-12
CHO
III-12
CHO CH2
1-Naphthaleneacetaldehyde, decahydro-5,5,8atrimethyl-2-oxo-, [1R-(1D,4aE,8aD)]-
III-12, III-13
86-87-3
0
1
0
1-Naphthaleneacetic acid
IV.A-3, XXI-3
132-75-2
1
0
0
1-Naphthaleneacetonitrile
XI-2
25551-35-3
1
0
0
Naphthalenecarbonitrile
XI-2
1
0
0
Naphthalenecarbonitrile, alkyl-
XI-2
1
0
0
Naphthalenecarbonitrile, methyl-
86-53-3
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenecarbonitrile
23245-64-9
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenecarbonitrile, 5-nitro-
XI-2
613-46-7
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenecarbonitrile
XI-2
68985-10-4
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenecarboxaldehyde, 3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8aoctahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, (4aS-trans)-
31519-22-9
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenecarboxylic acid, 1,4-dihydroxy-
79886-54-7
0
1
0
1,2-Naphthalenediol, decahydro-2,5,5,8atetramethyl-, [1R-(1D,2E,4aE,8aD)]-
37208-05-2
0
1
0
1,3-Naphthalenediol, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydro4,4a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1R(1D,3E,4E,4aD,6D)]-
XI-2
{2 isomers)
XI-2
IV.A-3 II.A-5
CH2 CH3
0
1
0
1,3-Naphthalenediol, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydro4,4a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-, 3-acetate, [1R(1D,3E,4.
II.A-5
OH
HO
114393-99-6
III-12
CHO
CH3
CH3
II.A-5, V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1661
11/24/08 1:56:48 PM
1662
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
65513-74-8
0
1
0
1,3-Naphthalenediol, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7-octahydro-6[1-(hydroxymethyl)ethenyl]-4,4a-dimethyl-, (1D,3E,4E,4aD,6D)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table II.A-5
92-44-4
1
0
0
2,3-Naphthalenediol
27656-76-4
0
1
0
IX.A-22
2,3-Naphthalenediol, 1,2D,3E,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro7D-isopropenyl-1D-methyl-
II.A-5
18178-54-6
1
1
1
2,3-Naphthalenediol, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydro-1methyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, [1S-(1D,2E,3D,7E)]{rishitin}
II.A-5
73496-12-5
0
1
0
2,3-Naphthalenediol, decahydro-2,5,5,8atetramethyl-1-(3-methyl-2,4-pentadienyl)-, [1S[1D(E),2D,3E,4aE,8aD]]-
1
0
0
1,2-Naphthalenedione
CH3 CH2 OH
H3C
524-42-5
II.A-5
CH3 CH3
OH
CH3
{1,2-naphthoquinone}
IX.B-2
O O
117769-22-9
0
1
0
2,3-Naphthalenedione, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-
III-13
CH3
CH3
O
H2C
O CH3
88125-12-6
0
1
0
2,3-Naphthalenedione, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, (4aS-cis)-
130-15-4
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione
{1,4-naphthoquinone}
III-13 O
IX.B-2
O
IX.B-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
117-80-6
0
1
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2,3-dichloro- {Diclone®}
73850-17-6
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, dimethyl-
IX.B-2
2197-57-1
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2,3-dimethyl-
IX.B-2
482-70-2
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2,7-dimethyl-
IX.B-2
68860-42-4
1
1
1
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2,3-dimethyl-6-(4,8,12trimethyltridecyl)-, (R*,R*)-
IX.B-2
481-39-0
0
1
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 5-hydroxy-
IX.B-2
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, methyl-
58-27-5
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2-methyl-
IX.B-2
84-80-0
0
1
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2-methyl-3-(3,7,11,15tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl)-, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]{Vitamin K1}
IX.B-2
73850-15-4
{juglone}
IX.B-2
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, tetramethyl-
IX.B-2
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, trimethyl-
IX.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1662
11/24/08 1:56:49 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1663
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
20490-42-0
1
1
1
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2,3,6-trimethyl-
IX.B-2
59832-90-5
1
0
0
1,4-Naphthalenedione, 2,6,7-trimethyl-
IX.B-2
102977-87-7
0
1
0
2-Naphthaleneethanol, 3,4-dihydro-1,5,6-trimethyl-
II.A-5
52617-99-9
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenemethanol, decahydro-2-hydroxy2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [1S-(1D,2E,4aE,8aD)]-
II.A-5
29484-46-6
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4,4a,8a-hexahydroD,D,4a,8-tetramethyl-, [2S-(2D,4aE,8aE)]-
II.A-5
473-17-6
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4,4a,8a-hexahydroD,D,4a,8-tetramethyl-, [2R-(2D,4aE,8aE)]-
II.A-5
87797-89-5
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-D,D,5,6tetramethyl-, (R)-
II.A-5
5986-36-7
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-D,D,5,8tetramethyl-, (R)-
II.A-5
61263-48-7
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-D,D,5,8tetramethyl-, acetate, (R)-
II.A-5
87797-88-4
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-D,D,7,8tetramethyl-, (R)-
II.A-5
121269-01-0
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenemethanol, 3,4-dihydro-1,5,6trimethyl-
II.A-5
10267-21-7
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenepentanol, decahydro-2-hydroxyJ,2,5,5,8a-pentamethyl-, [1R-[1D(S*),2E,4aE,8aD]]
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Naphthalene-2-pentenol, decahydro-J,2,5,5,8apentamethyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Naphthalene-2-pentenol, 3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8aoctahydro-J,2,5,5,8a-pentamethyl-
II.A-5
596-85-0
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenepropanol, D-ethenyldecahydroD,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-2-methylene-, [1S[1D(S*),4aE,8aD]]{manool}
4630-08-4
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenepropanol, D-ethenyldecahydro-2hydroxy-D,2,5,5,8a-pentamethyl-, [1R[1D(S*),2E,4aE,8aD]]{episclareol}
II.A-5
515-03-7
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenepropanol, D-ethenyldecahydro-2hydroxy-D,2,5,5,8a-pentamethyl-, [1R[1D(R*),2E,4aE,8aD]]{sclareol}
II.A-5
57567-06-3
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenepropanol, D-ethenyldecahydro-7hydroxy-D,5,5,8a- tetramethyl-2-methylene-
II.A-5
121198-51-4
0
1
0
Naphthalenol, 6,8-dimethyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
121198-52-5
0
1
0
Naphthalenol, 7,8-dimethyl-
90-15-3
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5
OH
IX.A-22 IX.A-22
{1-naphthol = D-naphthol}
IX.A-22
OH 8 2
7 6
3 5
40529-54-2 59534-35-9
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol, dimethyl-
4
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol, methyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol, methyl-nitro-
IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1663
11/24/08 1:56:49 PM
1664
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
7469-77-4
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol, 2-methyl-
63-25-2
1
1
1
1-Naphthalenol, methylcarbamate {Sevin®; Carbaryl®}
IX.A-22
529-33-9
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
55591-08-7
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2,5,8-trimethyl-
II.A-5
30316-22-4
1
0
0
1-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3,5,8-trimethyl-
II.A-5
66324-66-1
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-4,5,8-trimethyl-
II.A-5
67494-23-9
0
1
0
1-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-8-methyl-2-(1methylethenyl)-, (Z)-(r)
II.A-5
135-19-3
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol
31149-06-1
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, 1-[5-(acetyloxy)-3-methyl-3pentenyl]decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [1R[1D(E),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
0
1
0
II.A-5
OH
{2-naphthol = E-naphthol}
IX.A-22, XXI-3
OH
CH3 CH3
II.A-5, V-3
CH3 CH2O-COCH3 OH
H3C
66890-73-1
V-3, XXI-3
OOC-NH-CH3
CH3
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1-(3-hydroxy-3-methyl1,4-pentadienyl)-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [1R[1D(1E,3S*),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
II.A-5
OH
H3C
CH2 CH3
CH3
OH H3C
66966-02-7
0
1
0
CH3
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1-(3-hydroxy-3-methyl1,4-pentadienyl)-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [1R[1D(1E,3R*),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
II.A-5
OH
H3C
CH2 CH3
CH3
OH H3C
10267-31-9
0
1
0
CH3
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1-(5-hydroxy-3-methyl3-pentenyl)-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [1R[1D(E),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
CH3 CH3
II.A-5
CH3 CH2OH OH
H3C
CH3
22343-28-8
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1-(5-hydroxy-3-methyl3-pentenyl)-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [1R(1D,2E,4aE,8aD)]-
II.A-5
53163-43-2
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-1,2,5,5,8a-pentamethyl, [1R-(1D,2E,4aE,8aD)]-
II.A-5
36211-21-9
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl7 6
H3C
5
8a 4a
II.A-5
CH3
CH3 8
1 4
2 3
OH
CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1664
11/24/08 1:56:50 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1665
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
49749-17-9
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, (2D,4aD,8aE)-(±)-
II.A-5
42569-63-1
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1(3-methyl-1,3-pentadienyl)-, [1R[1D(1E,3E),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
II.A-5
1616-86-0
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1(3-methyl-2,4-pentadienyl)-, [1R-(1D,2E,4aE,8aD)]{Z-abienol}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
CH3 CH3
8 7
8a
6
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1(3-methyl-2,4-pentadienyl)-, [1R[1D(E),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
5
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1(3-methyl-2,4-pentadienyl)-, [1R[1D(Z),2E,4aE,8aD]]-
62121-32-8
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1[(3-methyl-2-furanyl)methyl]-, [1R(1D,2E,4aE,8aD)]-
2
CH2
OH
4
CH3
8 7
8a
II.A-5
CH3 1
CH3
2
OH 3
5
4 CH3
H3C
0
1
CH3
6
17990-16-8
II.A-5, XXI-3
CH3
3
H3C
17990-15-7
Chapter Table
II.A-5
II.A-5
O
CH3
CH3
CH3 OH
H3C
CH3
82451-46-5
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-4a,8,8-trimethyl-3methylene-4-(3-methyl-2,4-pentadienyl)-, [2S[2D,4D(E),4aD,8aE]]-
II.A-5
82458-63-7
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-4a,8,8-trimethyl-3methylene-4-(3-methylene-4-pentenyl)-, [2S(2D,4D,4aD,8aE)]-
II.A-5
58239-50-2
0
1
0
2-Naphthalenol, decahydro-5,5,8a-trimethyl-, [2R(2D,4aD,8aE)]-
II.A-5
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, dimethyl-
IX.A-22
54703-51-4
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, 1,8-dimethyl-
IX.A-22
59534-36-0
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, methyl-
IX.A-22 IX.A-22
1076-26-2
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, 1-methyl-
71369-76-1
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, tetrahydro-
530-91-6
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
1125-78-6
IX.A-22 II.A-5
OH
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, 5,6,7,8-tetramethyl-
IX.A-22
73850-18-7
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, trimethyl-
IX.A-22
30889-50-0
1
0
0
2-Naphthalenol, 3,5,8-trimethyl-
17910-08-6
0
1
0
4a(2H)-Naphthalenol, 1,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-4,7dimethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1D,4aE,7D,8aD)]-
IX.A-22 5 6
4a 7
H3C
OH
4 1
8
H3C
II.A-5
CH3 3 2
CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1665
11/24/08 1:56:50 PM
1666
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
529-34-0
1
0
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4-dihydro-
117210-52-3
0
1
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(1methylethenyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4-dihydro-4,5,6-trimethyl-
III-13
27410-97-5
1
0
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4-dihydro-4,5,7-trimethyl-
III-13
41720-93-8
0
1
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4,4a,5,6,7-hexahydro-3hydroxy-4,4a-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-, [3R(3D,4D,4aE,6E)]-
III-13
52811-60-6
0
1
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, octahydro-2-hydroxy2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
{1-tetralone}
III-13
O
O
H3C
Chapter Table
II.A-5, III-13
OH CH3
H3C
55497-93-3
0
1
0
1(2H)-Naphthalenone, octahydro-2-hydroxy2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, [2R- (2D,4aD,8aE)]-
25487-94-9
0
1
0
1(4H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-, (4aS-trans)-
CH3
II.A-5, III-13 H3C
H3C
III-13
O CH3
CH3
57601-69-1
0
1
0
1(4H)-Naphthalenone, 2-hydroxy-4,4,7-trimethyl-
117472-47-6
0
1
0
1(4H)-Naphthalenone, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-8-methyl5-(1-methylethenyl)-
III-13
29210-91-1
1
0
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4-dihydro-4,4,7-trimethyl-
III-13
55733-01-2
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro3,4,4a,8,8-pentamethyl-, (4aS-trans)-
III-13
76739-26-9
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro3,4,4a,8,8-pentamethyl-
III-13
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3hydroxy-3,4a,8,8-tetramethyl{2 isomers reported}
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro3,4a,8,8-tetramethyl-, (4aR-trans){isonordimenone}
51020-10-1
III-13, IX.A-22
II.A-5, III-13
H3C
H3C
CH3
III-13
CH3
O
72446-33-4
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 4a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro3,4a,8,8-tetramethyl-4-(3-oxobutyl)-, (4aS-trans)-
III-13
14506-68-4
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 1-(3-hydroxy-3-methyl-4pentenyl)-octahydro-5,5,8a-trimethyl-, [1R[1D(R*),4aE,8aD]]-
II.A-5, III-13
57567-07-4
0
1
0
2(1H)-Naphthalenone, 8-(3-hydroxy-3-methyl-4pentenyl)-octahydro-4,4,8a- trimethyl-7methylene-
II.A-5, III-13
473-08-5
1
1
1
2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-1,4adimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, (4aS-cis){bicyclo[4.4.0]dec-1-en-3-one, 2,6-dimethyl-9isopropenyl-}
60026-22-4
1
0
0
2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-1,4adimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)- {6-epicyperone-1}
O
III-13
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1666
11/24/08 1:56:51 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1667
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
55051-94-0
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-3hydroxy-4-methyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-, [3R(3D,4E,4aE,6D)]-
Selected structures
II.A-5, III-13
CH2
CH3 HO
Chapter Table
CH3
O
4674-50-4
0
1
0
2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,4adimethyl-6-(1-methylethenyl)-, [4R-(4D,4aD,6E)]{bicyclo[4.4.0]dec-1-en-3-one, 5,6-dimethyl-8isopropenyl-} {nootkatone}
102977-86-6
0
1
0
2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-4a,8dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-
38044-00-7
0
1
0
2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-4hydroxy-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-
39815-74-2
0
1
0
2(3H)-Naphthalenone, 4,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4,4,7trimethyl-
CH3
III-13
CH2
CH3
CH3 O
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
3
4
III-13
5
6 7
2
O
68420-60-0
0
1
0
2(4aH)-Naphthalenone, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-3hydroxy-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, (4aScis)-
II.A-5, III-13
CH3
HO
CH2
O CH3
CH3
38043-97-9
1
1
1
2(4aH)-Naphthalenone, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4hydroxy-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethenyl)-, (4aRcis){1-keto-Į-cyperone}
OH
II.A-5, III-13
CH3
CH2
O CH3
CH3
0
1
0
2(6H)-Naphthalenone, 3,4,7,8-tetrahydro-4,4,7trimethyl-
3 2
4
5
III-13 6 7
O
1338-24-5
0
1
0
Naphthenic acids
IV.A-3
192-65-4
1
0
0
Naphtho[1,2,3,4-def]chrysene {dibenzo[a,e]pyrene}
I.E-6
190-99-8
1
0
0
1H-Naphtho[3,2,1,8-defg]chrysene {1,2,5,6-dibenzopyrene}
I.E-6
11141-17-6
0
1
0
1H,7H-Naphtho[1,8a,8-bc:4,4a-c’]difuran-3,7a1 dicarboxylic acid, (3S,3aR,4S, 5S,5aR, 5a R 7aS,8R,10S,10aS)-8-acetoxy1 3,3a,4,5a,5a ,7a,8,9,10-decahydro-3,5-dihydroxy4-{(1S,3S,7S,8R,9S,11R)-7-hydroxy-9-methyl3,7 9,11 2,4,10-trioxatetracyclo[6.3.1.0 .0 ]dodeca-5-en11-yl}-4-methyl-10[(E)-2-methylbut-2-enoyloxy]-, dimethyl ester {Azadirachtin® A and B, Neem®}
XXI-3
1
0
0
Naphthofuran
X-2
1
0
0
Naphthofuran, dimethyl-
X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1667
11/24/08 1:56:53 PM
1668
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Naphthofuran, methyl-
X-2
234-03-7
1
0
0
Naphtho[1,2-b]furan
X-2
71607-62-0
1
0
0
Naphtho[1,2-b]furan, dimethyl-
X-2
25826-63-5
1
0
0
Naphtho[1,2-b]furan, 2-methyl-
232-95-1
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan
X-2 X-2 O
65588-69-4 6790-58-5
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan, dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9atetramethyl-, [3aR-(3aD,5aE,9aD,9bE)]{ambroxide; ambroxyl}
52811-62-8
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-ol, dodecahydro-3a,6,6,9atetramethyl{sclaral}
X-2
O
H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
CH3 CH3
O OH
30450-17-0
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(1H)-one, decahydro3a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl-, [3aS- (3aD,5aD,9aE,9bD)]-
564-20-5
1
1
1
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(1H)-one, decahydro3a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl-, [3aR-(3aD,5aE,9aD,9bE)]{1,5,5,9-tetramethyl-13oxatricyclo[8,3,0,0(4,9)]tridecane} {sclareolide}
52811-59-3
1
1
1
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(1H)-one, decahydro3a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl-, [3aR-(3aD,5aE,9aD,9bE)]{1,5,5,9-tetramethyl-1314 oxatricyclo[8,3,0,0(4,9)]tridecane}, labeled with C 14 {sclareolide- C}
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2(3aH)-one, 4,5,5a,6,7,8,9,9aoctahydro-3a,6,6,9a-tetramethyl-, [3aR(3aD,5aE,9aD)]-
X-2 H3C
VI-3
CH3 CH3 CH3
O
O
XXV-29
H 3C
VI-3
CH3
CH 3 O
CH3
O
56682-25-8
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-methanol, Dethenyldodecahydro-D,3a,6,6,9a-pentamethyl-, [2R-[2D(R*),3aE,5aD,9aE,9bD]]-
II.A-5, X-2
OH H2C CH3
CH3 O CH3
H3C
56711-38-7
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-methanol, Dethenyldodecahydro-D,3a,6,6,9a-pentamethyl-, [2R-[2D(S*),3aE,5aD,9aE,9bD]]-
CH3
OH H2C CH3
II.A-5, X-2
CH3 O CH3
H3C
CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1668
11/24/08 1:56:53 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1669
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
56711-39-8
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-methanol, Dethenyldodecahydro-D,3a,6,6,9a-pentamethyl-, [2S-[2D(S*),3aD,5aE,9aD,9bE]]-
II.A-5, X-2
OH H2C
Chapter Table
CH3
CH3
O CH3
H3C
56711-40-1
0
1
0
Naphtho[2,1-b]furan-2-methanol, Dethenyldodecahydro-D,3a,6,6,9a-pentamethyl-, [2S-[2D(R*),3aD,5aE,9aD,9bE]]-
CH3
II.A-5, X-2
OH H2C
CH3
CH3
O CH3
H3C
196-42-9
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1,8-qra]naphthacene
52811-58-2
0
1
0
3H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-3-one, 4a,5,6,6a,7,8,9,10,10a,10b-decahydro-4a,7,7,10atetramethyl-, [4aR-(4aD,6aE,10aD,10bE)]{dehydroambreinolide}
CH3
I.E-6
H3C
VI-3
CH3 CH3 O
CH3
O
468-84-8
0
1
0
3H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-3-one, dodecahydro4a,7,7,10a-tetramethyl-, [4aR(4aD,6aE,10aD,10bE)]{ambreinolide}
VI-3
5153-92-4
0
1
0
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran, 4a,5,6,6a,7,8,9,10,10a,10b-decahydro3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [4aR(4aD,6aE,10aD,10bE)]-
X-2
6252-26-2
0
1
0
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran, dodecahydro3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-
X-2
596-84-9
0
1
0
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran, 3-ethenyldodecahydro3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [3R(3D,4aE,6aD,10aE,10bD)]-
X-2
59170-14-8
1
1
1
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2-ol, 3ethenyldodecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [2S-(2D,3E,4aE,6aD,10aE,10bD)]{labd-14-ene, 8,13-epoxy-12Į-hydroxy-} {12Į-hydroxy-13-epimanoyl oxide}
OH
0
1
0
CH2
CH3 O CH3 H3C
64681-69-2
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2-ol, 3ethenyldodecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [2R-(2D,3D,4aD,6aE,10aD,10bE)]-
CH3
OH
II.A-5, X-2
CH3 CH2
CH3 O CH3 H3C
CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1669
11/24/08 1:56:54 PM
1670
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
64681-70-5
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2-ol, 3ethenyldodecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [2S-(2D,3D,4aE,6aD,10aE,10bD)]-
OH
Chapter Table II.A-5, X-2
CH3 CH2
CH3 O CH3 H3C
67528-84-1
0
1
0
CH3
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2-ol, 3ethenyldodecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [2R-(2D,3E,4aD,6aE,10aD,10bE)]-
OH
II.A-5, X-2
CH3 CH2
CH3 O CH3 H3C
37551-73-8
0
1
0
CH3
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2(3H)-one, 3ethenyldecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [3S(3D,4aE,6aD,10aE,10bD)]-
O
III-13, X-2
CH3 CH2
CH3 O CH3 H3C
37551-74-9
0
1
0
CH3
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2(3H)-one, 3ethenyldecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-, [3R(3D,4aD,6aE,10aD,10bE)]-
O
III-13, X-2
CH3 CH2
CH3 O CH3 H3C
CH3
68985-12-6
0
1
0
1H-Naphtho[2,1-b]pyran-2(3H)-one, 3ethenyldecahydro-3,4a,7,7,10a-pentamethyl-
III-13
313-80-4
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1,8-def]quinoline
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1,8-def]quinoline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1,8-def]quinoline, methyl-
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6
XVII.E-6
{1-azapyrene}
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1,8-def]quinoline, trimethyl-
215-26-9
1
0
0
Naphtho[1,2-b]triphenylene {tribenz[a,c,h]anthracene}
191-37-7
1
0
0
Naphtho[2,1,8,7-klmn]xanthene
I.E-6
X-2
1
11 10
2
3
9 6
8 7
O
4 5
1
0
0
Naphthyridine
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Naphthyridine, C2-alkyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Naphthyridine, 3-butyryl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Naphthyridine, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1670
11/24/08 1:56:54 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1671
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
254-79-5
1
0
0
1,5-Naphthyridine {1,5-diazanaphthalene; pyrido[3,2-b]pyridine}
XVII.E-6
18937-71-8
1
0
0
1,5-Naphthyridine, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
253-72-5
1
0
0
1,6-Naphthyridine {1,6-diazanaphthalene; pyrido[4,3-b]pyridine}
XVII.E-6
14757-43-8
1
0
0
1,6-Naphthyridine, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
253-69-0
1
0
0
1,7-Naphthyridine {1,7-diazanaphthalene; pyrido[3,4-b]pyridine}
XVII.E-6
254-60-4
1
0
0
1,8-Naphthyridine {1,8-diazanaphthalene; pyrido[2,3-b]pyridine}
XVII.E-6
14757-45-0
1
0
0
1,8-Naphthyridine, 2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
14759-22-9
1
0
0
1,8-Naphthyridine, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
40000-89-3
1
0
0
1,8-Naphthyridin-2(1H)-one, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
8002-65-1
0
1
0
Neem oil
7440-00-8
1
1
1
Neodymium
Ne
XX-5
7440-02-0
1
1
1
Nickel
Ni
XX-5
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XXI-3
12612-55-4
1
0
0
Nickel carbonyl
Ni(CO)4
XX-6
7440-03-1
1
0
0
Niobium
Nb
XX-5
NO3
XX-6
14797-55-8
1
1
1
Nitrate
125239-87-4
1
0
0
Nitrate, peroxy-
7697-37-2
1
1
1
Nitric acid
HO-NO2
XX-6
7757-79-1
0
1
0
Nitric acid, potassium salt
KO-NO2
XX-6
XX-6
98-58-3
1
0
0
Nitric acid, methyl ester
H3C-O-NO2
7631-99-4
0
1
0
Nitric acid, sodium salt
NaO-NO2
14797-65-0
1
1
1
Nitrite
O=N-O
XX-6
1
0
0
Nitrite, peroxy-
1
0
0
Nitrite radical
O-N=O
XXVII-1
N2
19059-14-4
-1
XX-6
7727-37-9
1
1
1
Nitrogen
11104-93-1
1
0
0
Nitrogen oxide
10024-97-2
1
1
1
Nitrogen oxide
{nitrous oxide}
10102-43-9
1
1
1
Nitrogen oxide
{nitric oxide} {nitrogen dioxide}
10102-44-0 35576-91-1
V-3 XX-6
XX-5 XIX-5
N2O NO
XIX-5 XXVII-1
1
0
0
Nitrogen oxide
NO2
XIX-5
1
1
1
Nitrogen oxides
N2O + NO + NO2
XIX-5
1
0
0
Nitrosamide
H2N-N=O
XIII-1 XX-6
1
1
1
N-Nitrosamines
7782-77-6
1
0
0
Nitrous acid
{GENERAL DISCUSSION} HO-N=O
XV
109-95-5
1
0
0
Nitrous acid, ethyl ester
H3C-CH2-ON=O
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1671
11/24/08 1:56:55 PM
1672
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
624-91-9
1
1
1
Nitrous acid, methyl ester
H3C-ON=O
630-03-5
1
1
1
Nonacosane
H3C-(CH2)27-CH3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table V-3 I.A-10
1560-75-4
1
1
1
Nonacosane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)26-CH3
I.A-10
14167-67-0
1
1
1
Nonacosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)25-CH3
I.A-10 IV.A-3
4250-38-8
1
0
0
Nonacosanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)27-COOH
121878-05-5
1
1
1
Nonacosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)27-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 H3C-(CH2)27-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
121877-94-9
1
1
1
Nonacosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
39815-65-1
0
1
0
Nonacosanoic acid, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)phenyl ester
629-92-5
646-30-0
V-3 V-3 V-3
0
1
0
1-Nonacosanol
H3C-(CH2)27-CH2OH
II.A-5
1
0
0
1-Nonacosene
H2C=CH-(CH2)26-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Nonacosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)26-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonacoscene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)25-CH3
1
0
0
2-Nonacoscene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Nonacosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)25-CH3
1
0
0
2-Nonacosene, 27-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)23-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonacosene, 27-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Nonacosene, 28-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Nonacosene, 28-methyl-, (E)-
1
1
1
Nonadecane
1
0
0
Nonadecane, methyl-
0
1
0
Nonadecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)15-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)17-COOH
IV.A-3
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)24-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1
H3C-(CH2)17-CH3
I.A-10 I.A-10
42232-76-8
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42232-66-6
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
36610-54-5
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
42232-75-7
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
36610-51-2 36610-50-1
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1731-94-8
0
1
0
Nonadecanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-CH3
V-3
36610-53-4
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
36610-52-3
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
36610-49-8
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
121877-66-5
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
36610-48-7
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
42232-77-9
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
36610-47-6
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)17-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
53254-53-8
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)15-COOH IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1672
11/24/08 1:56:55 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1673
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
121877-54-1
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-69-8
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-, tetracosyl ester
H 3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)23-CH3 V-3
121877-59-6
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-, tricosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)15-COO-(CH2)22-CH3 V-3 (H3C)2=CH-(CH2)16-COOH
Name (per CA Collective Index)
6250-72-2
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 18-methyl-
145090-31-9
0
1
0
Nonadecanoic acid, 18-methyl-, 2-(acetyloxy)-1(hydroxymethyl)ethyl ester
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 18-methyl-, eicosyl ester
Chapter Table
Selected structures
IV.A-3 V-3
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
150643-41-7
0
1
0
Nonadecanoic acid, 18-methyl-, ester with 1,2,3propanetriol monoacetate mono(16methylheptadecanoate)
V-3
121877-51-8
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 18-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
121877-37-0
1
1
1
Nonadecanoic acid, 18-methyl-, nonadecyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3 V-3 71607-90-4
1
0
0
Nonadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
V-3
52783-43-4
1
0
0
Nonadecanol
II.A-5
1
1
1
1-Nonadecanol
6809-52-5
1
1
1
5,9,13,17-Nonadecatetraen-2-one, 6,10,14,18tetramethyl-
27400-77-7
1
0
0
Nonadecene
H-(CH2)n-CH=CH-(CH2)(17-n)-H
I.B-1
18435-45-5
1
1
1
1-Nonadecene
H2C=CH-(CH2)16-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Nonadecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)16-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)15-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)15-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, 17-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)13-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, 17-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, 18-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Nonadecene, 18-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
1
1
1
2,4-Nonadienal, (E,E)-
III-12
0
1
0
2,4-Nonadienal, 6-methyl-
III-12
0
1
0
2,4-Nonadienal, 8-methyl-
III-12
26370-28-5
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadienal
557-48-2
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadienal, (E,Z)-
129777-21-5
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadienal, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-8-oxo-, (E,E)-(+)-
0
1
0
Nonadiene
0
1
0
Nonadienoic acid
6750-03-4 5910-87-2
71030-52-9
H3C-(CH2)17-CH2OH
II.A-5 III-13
I.B-1
{leaf aldehyde violet}
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)14-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
III-12 III-12 III-12, III-13 I.B-1 IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1673
11/24/08 1:56:56 PM
1674
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
2,4-Nonadienoic acid, 2,3-dimethyl-
IV.A-3
60026-10-0
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadienoic acid
IV.A-3
23605-13-2
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadienoic acid, (E,Z)-
IV.A-3
70898-29-2
0
1
0
2,7-Nonadienoic acid, (E,Z)-
IV.A-3
0
1
0
4,6-Nonadienoic acid
IV.A-3
7786-44-9
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadien-1-ol
II.A-5
28069-72-9
0
1
0
2,6-Nonadien-1-ol, (E,Z)-
II.A-5
56805-23-3
0
1
0
3,6-Nonadien-1-ol
II.A-5
53046-97-2
0
1
0
3,6-Nonadien-1-ol, (Z,Z)-
II.A-5
38713-12-1
0
1
0
3,7-Nonadien-1-ol, 4,8-dimethyl- {homogeraniol}
II.A-5
459-88-1
0
1
0
3,7-Nonadien-1-ol, 4,8-dimethyl-, (E)-
II.A-5
150405-75-7
0
1
0
6,8-Nonadien-2-ol, 8-methyl-5-(3-methylbutyl)-
II.A-5
40525-38-0
1
1
1
6,8-Nonadien-2-ol, 8-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl){solanol} {solanol isomer}
II.A-5
0
1
0
3,7-Nonadien-2-one, 4,8-dimethyl-
III-13
0
1
0
3,8-Nonadien-2-one, 4,8-dimethyl-
III-13
1
0
0
5,7-Nonadien-2-one, 8-hydroxy-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (E,Z)-
III-13
1
1
1
5,7-Nonadien-2-one, 8-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl){isosolanone}
III-13
60714-16-1
0
1
0
6,8-Nonadien-2-one, 6-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-
III-13
2278-53-7
0
1
0
6,8-Nonadien-2-one, 8-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, [R-(E)]-
III-13
1937-54-8
1
1
1
6,8-Nonadien-2-one, 8-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, [S-(E)]{solanone}
64130-24-1
123695-65-8
54868-48-3
0
1
0
6,8-Nonadien-2-one, 8-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, (E)-
124-19-6
1
1
1
Nonanal
111-84-2
1
1
1
Nonane
1
0
0
Nonane, 4-acetyl-2,6,8-trimethyl-
871-83-0
1
0
0
Nonane, 2-methyl-
51655-64-2
1
0
0
Nonane, 3-methylene-
123-99-9
1
1
1
Nonanedioic acid
3937-56-2
0
1
0
1,9-Nonanediol
55023-56-8
{pelargonaldehyde}
III-13 O
III-13 H3C-(CH2)7-CH=O H3C-(CH2)7-CH3
III-12 I.A-10 III-13 I.A-10 I.B-1
{azelaic acid}
HOOC-(CH2)7-COOH HOCH2-(CH2)7-CH2OH
IV.A-3 II.A-5
1
1
1
2,8-Nonanediol, 5-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5
0
1
0
2,5-Nonanedione
III-13
0
1
0
2,7-Nonanedione, 8-hydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1674
11/24/08 1:56:57 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1675
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
55023-57-9
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) 2,8-Nonanedione, 5-(1-methylethyl){norsolanadione}
Chapter Table
Selected structures
III-13 O O
38284-28-5
0
1
0
2,5,8-Nonanetrione
112-05-0
1
1
1
Nonanoic acid
123-29-5
0
1
0
Nonanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-COO-C2H5 H3C-(CH2)7-COO-CH3
1731-84-6
0
1
0
Nonanoic acid, methyl ester
41653-89-8
0
1
0
Nonanoic acid, 7-methyl-
6064-52-4
0
1
0
Nonanoic acid, 4-oxo-
143-08-8
1
1
1
1-Nonanol
III-13 {pelargonic acid}
H3C-(CH2)7-COOH
IV.A-3 V-3 V-3 IV.A-3 III-13, IV.A-3
H3C-(CH2)7-CH2OH
II.A-5
1
0
0
4-Nonanol, 2,6,8-trimethyl-
821-55-6
1
1
1
2-Nonanone
58002-07-6
0
1
0
2-Nonanone, 6,7-epoxy-8-hydroxy-5-(1methylethyl)-
III-13
55023-54-6
68-26-8
III-13
0
1
0
2-Nonanone, 8-hydroxy-5-(1-methylethyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
4-Nonanone, 2,6,8-trimethyl
III-13
0
1
0
5-Nonanone, 2,8-dimethyl-7,8-epoxy-
III-13
0
1
0
2,4,6,8-Nonatetraen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-9-(2,6,6trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (all-E){retinol}
II.A-5
1
1
1
Nonatriacontane
0
1
0
3,5,7-Nonatrien-2-one
2463-53-8
1
1
1
2-Nonenal
18829-56-6
0
1
0
2-Nonenal, (E)-
0
1
0
2-Nonenal, 2,3-dimethyl-8-oxo-
0
1
0
6-Nonenal, (Z)-
1
0
0
1-Nonene
1
0
0
2-Nonene, 3-methyl-
2277-19-2
II.A-5 H3C-(CH2)6-CO-CH3
H3C-(CH2)37-CH3
I.A-10 III-13
H3C-(CH2)5-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12 III-12 III-12, III-13 III-12
H3C-(CH2)6-CH=CH2
I.B-1 I.B-1
53966-53-3
1
0
0
3-Nonene, 2-methyl-
55023-53-5
1
1
1
3-Nonene-2,8-diol, 5-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=CH-CH=(CH3)2
I.B-1
38372-56-4
1
1
1
3-Nonene-2,8-dione
{norsolanadione}
III-13
60619-46-7 35953-21-0
1
1
1
3-Nonene-2,8-dione, 5-(1-methylethyl)-, [S-(E)]{oxysolanone}
III-13
37822-76-7
0
1
0
Nonenoic acid, methyl ester
3760-11-0
0
1
0
2-Nonenoic acid
14812-03-4
0
1
0
2-Nonenoic acid, (E)-
IV.A-3
II.A-5
V-3 H3C-(CH2)5-CH=CH-COOH
IV.A-3
4124-88-3
0
1
0
3-Nonenoic acid
IV.A-3
41653-98-9
0
1
0
3-Nonenoic acid, (Z)-
IV.A-3
41653-99-0
0
1
0
6-Nonenoic acid, (Z)-
IV.A-3
31642-67-8
0
1
0
8-Nonenoic acid
IV.A-3
31502-14-4
0
1
0
2-Nonen-1-ol
10340-23-5
0
1
0
3-Nonen-1-ol, (Z)-
H3C-(CH2)5-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1675
11/24/08 1:56:57 PM
1676
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
68985-18-2
0
1
0
2-Nonen-4-one, 3-methyl-, (E)-
65017-85-8
0
1
0
2-Nonen-4-one, 8-hydroxy-3-methyl-, (E)-
II.A-5, III-13
III-13
0
1
0
5-Nonen-2-one, 8-hydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
55023-59-1
0
1
0
6-Nonen-2-one, 8-hydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
57934-86-8
0
1
0
6-Nonen-2-one, 8-hydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, (E)-(±)-
II.A-5, III-13
55023-52-4
0
1
0
6-Nonen-2-one, 8-hydroxy-5-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
77288-95-0
0
1
0
6-Nonen-2-one, 8,9-dihydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, [R-[R*,S*-(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13
77288-96-1
0
1
0
6-Nonen-2-one, 8,9-dihydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, [S-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
II.A-5, III-13
3452-09-3
1
0
0
1-Nonyne
18444-66-1
0
1
0
19-Norlanosta-1,5,23-triene-3,11,22-trione, 25(acetyloxy)-2,16,20-trihydroxy-9-methyl-, (9E,10D,16D,23E)-
II.A-5, III-13, V-3
17278-28-3
0
1
0
19-Norlanosta-5,23-diene-2,11,22-trione, 25(acetyloxy)-3,16,20-trihydroxy-9-methyl-, (3D,9E,10D,16D,23E)-
II.A-5, III-13, V-3
89647-62-1
0
1
0
19-Norlanosta-5,23-diene-2,11,22-trione, 25(acetyloxy)-3,16,20-trihydroxy-9-methyl-, (3E,9E,10D,16D,23E)-
II.A-5, III-13, V-3
5157-09-5
0
1
0
Norleucine
9026-81-7
0
1
0
Nuclease
XXII-2
9003-98-9
0
1
0
Nuclease, deoxyribo-
XXII-2
9055-11-2
0
1
0
Nuclease, endo-
XXII-2
59977-50-3
0
1
0
Nuclease, mammalian deoxyribonucleate-nicking endo-
XXII-2
9001-99-4
0
1
0
Nuclease, ribo-
XXII-2
9025-44-9
0
1
0
Nucleosidase
XXII-2
9033-33-4
0
1
0
Nucleotidase
XXII-2
9012-90-2
0
1
0
Nucleotidyltransferase, deoxyribonucleate
XXII-2
9068-38-6
0
1
0
Nucleotidyltransferase, deoxyribonucleate, RNAdependent
XXII-2
9014-12-4
0
1
0
Nucleotidyltransferase, polyribonucleotide
XXII-2
9014-24-8
0
1
0
Nucleotidyltransferase, ribonucleate
XXII-2
9026-28-2
0
1
0
Nucleotidyltransferase, ribonucleate, RNAdependent
XXII-2
66328-00-5
1
0
0
2,6,10,14,18,22,26-Octacosaheptaene, 2,6,10,14,18,22,26-heptamethyl-, (all-E)-
HCŁC-(CH2)6-CH3
{2-aminohexanoic acid}
I.B-1
H3C-(CH2)3-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
I.B-1
630-02-4
1
1
1
Octacosane
H3C-(CH2)26-CH3
I.A-10
1560-98-1
1
1
1
Octacosane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)25-CH3
I.A-10
65820-58-8
1
1
1
Octacosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)24-CH3
I.A-10
506-48-9
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)26-COOH
IV.A-3
121878-02-2
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1676
11/24/08 1:56:58 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1677
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
121877-91-6
121877-95-0
80756-16-7 95415-29-5
S
T
S T
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, ester with olean-12-en-3-ol, (3E){ȕ-amyrenyl octacosanoate)
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
80252-40-0
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
28570-28-7
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)26-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
121878-04-4
1
1
1
Octacosanoic acid, 26-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)24-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
557-61-9
1
1
1
1-Octacosanol
H3C-(CH2)26-CH2OH
0
1
0
1-Octacosanol, 26-methyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Octacosanol, 27-methyl-
II.A-5
18835-34-2
{montanyl alcohol}
II.A-5
1
0
0
1-Octacosene
H3C-(CH2)25-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Octacosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)25-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)24-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)24-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, 26-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)23-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, 26-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, 27-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Octacosene, 27-methyl-, (E)-
26764-25-0
1
0
0
Octadecadienoic acid
IV.A-3
28984-77-2
0
1
0
Octadecadienoic acid, (Z,Z)-
IV.A-3
97145-16-9
0
1
0
Octadecadienoic acid, 1-[[[(2aminoethoxy)hydroxyphosphinyl]oxy]methyl]-1,2ethanediyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
97190-11-9
0
1
0
Octadecadienoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol 1-(2-aminoethyl hydrogen phosphate) hexadecanoate
V-3
97190-13-1
0
1
0
Octadecadienoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol 1-(2-aminoethyl hydrogen phosphate) octadecanoate, (Z,Z)-
V-3
28061-47-4
0
1
0
Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester
V-3
I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)23-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1677
11/24/08 1:56:58 PM
1678
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
97210-24-7
0
1
0
Octadecadienoic acid, monoester with 1,2,3propanetriol 1,1'-(hydrogen phosphate) mono-3hexadecenoate, [R-[R*,S*-(E)]]-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
V-3
60-33-3
1
1
1
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, (Z,Z)-
{linoleic acid}
IV.A-3
506-21-8
1
1
1
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, (E,E)- {linoleic acid}
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=CH-CH2-CH=CH-(CH2)7COOH IV.A-3
26836-35-1
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, ester with 1,2,3propanetriol monohexadecanoate mono[(Z)-9octadecenoate]
544-35-4
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, ethyl ester {ethyl linoleate}
4546-59-2
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, 18-hydroxy-, (Z,Z)-
2462-85-3
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester
112-63-0
1
1
1
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester {methyl linoleate}
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=CH-CH2-CH=CH-(CH2)7COO-CH3 V-3
26836-38-4
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, monoester with 1,2,3-propanetriol monooctadecanoate mono-9octadecenoate, (Z)-
V-3
28880-78-6
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, monoester with 1,2,3-propanetriol bis[(Z)-9-octadecenoate]
V-3
34521-51-2
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, monoester with 1,2,3-propanetriol dioctadecanoate
V-3
70495-60-2
1
1
1
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-hexa-triacontanonaenyl ester
V-3
53950-59-7
1
0
0
9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, 3,7,11,15tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
V-3
506-43-4
0
1
0
9,12-Octadecadien-1-ol, (Z,Z)-
56847-03-1
1
0
0
Octadecadiynoic acid, methyl ester
593-45-3
1
1
1
Octadecane
1560-88-9
V-3
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=CH-CH2-CH=CH-(CH2)7COO-C2H5 V-3 IV.A-3 V-3
II.A-5 V-3 H3C-(CH2)16-CH3
I.A-10
0
1
0
Octadecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)15-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
0
1
0
Octadecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)14-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
554-62-1
0
1
0
1,3,4-Octadecanetriol, 2-amino-, [2S(2R*,3R*,4S*)]{stearic acid}
II.A-5, XII-2
57-11-4
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid
22413-03-2
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
H3C-(CH2)16-COOH
IV.A-3 V-3
5303-25-3
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
22413-02-1
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
111-61-5
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
{ethyl stearate}
42232-59-7
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
121877-78-9
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
18299-82-6
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
58886-94-5
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
1190-63-2
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
1330-70-7
0
1
0
Octadecanoic acid, hydroxy-
3155-42-8
0
1
0
Octadecanoic acid, 18-hydroxy-
V-3 IV.A-3
HOCH2-(CH2)16-COOH
IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1678
11/24/08 1:56:59 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1679
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
112-61-8
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-CH3
V-3
121877-86-9
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, nonacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)28-CH3
V-3
36610-45-4
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
70495-59-9
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester
63317-82-8
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, octacosyl ester
V-3
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)27-CH3
V-3
2778-96-3
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
121877-65-4
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
18299-80-4
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42232-61-1
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
17661-50-6
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
63317-83-9
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, triacontyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)29-CH3
V-3
42232-60-0
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3 V-3
31556-45-3
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)16-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
17001-28-4
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)14-COOH IVA-3
121877-53-0
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-75-6
1
1
1
Octadecanoic acid, 16-methyl-, hexacosyl ester
H 3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)14-COO-(CH2)25-CH3 V-3
2724-59-6 62172-54-7
0
1
0
Octadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)15-COOH
0
1
0
Octadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-, methyl ester
(H 3C)2=CH-(CH2)15-COO-CH3
1
0
0
Octadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]{stearyl alcohol}
H3C-(CH2)16-CH2OH
IV.A-3 V-3 V-3
112-92-5
1
1
1
1-Octadecanol
2490-01-9
0
1
0
1-Octadecanol, 16-methyl-
II.A-5
51592-59-7
0
1
0
3,6,9,12,15-Octadecapentaenoic acid, (all-Z)-
IV.A-3
25448-06-0
0
1
0
Octadecatetraenoic acid
IV.A-3
25448-03-7
0
1
0
Octadecatrienoic acid
IV.A-3
27213-43-0
0
1
0
Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)-
IV.A-3
97190-08-4
0
1
0
Octadecatrienoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol 1-(2-aminoethyl hydrogen phosphate) octadecadienoate, (all-Z)-
V-3
97229-62-4
0
1
0
Octadecatrienoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol 1-(2-aminoethyl hydrogen phosphate) 2(or 3)hexadecanoate, (Z,Z,Z)-
V-3
97229-63-5
0
1
0
Octadecatrienoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol 1,1'-(hydrogen phosphate) 2(or 3)-(3hexadecenoate), [R-(R*,S*)]-
V-3
29565-44-4
0
1
0
Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester
V-3
13296-76-9
1
0
0
9,11,13-Octadecatrienoic acid
463-40-1
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z){linolenic acid}
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COOH IV.A-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, docosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
II.A-5
IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1679
11/24/08 1:57:00 PM
1680
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, dodecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)11-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, eicosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
0
1
0
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COOC2H5 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, heneicosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, heptacosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)26-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, heptadecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)16-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, hexacosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)25-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, hexadecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)15-CH3 V-3
51327-73-2
0
1
0
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, 18-hydroxy-, (Z,Z,Z)-
HOCH2-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COOH IV.A-3
7361-80-0
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester {methyl linolenate}
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COOCH3
301-00-8
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester, (Z,Z,Z){methyl linolenate}
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, nonadecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)18-CH3 V-3
28973-74-2
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35-nonamethyl2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-hexatriacontanonaenyl ester
17673-60-8
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, octadecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)17-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, pentacosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)24-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, pentadecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)14-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, tetracosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)23-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, tetradecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)13-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, tricosyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)22-CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, tridecyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
H3C-(CH2CH=CH)3-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)12-CH3 V-3
30452-68-7
1
0
0
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, 3,7,11,15tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*(E,Z,Z,Z)]]-
506-44-5
1
0
0
9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-ol, (Z,Z,Z)-
56554-87-1
0
1
0
16-Octadecenal
27070-58-2
1
0
0
Octadecene
CAS No.
1191-41-9
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
V-3
V-3
V-3
II.A-5 III-12 H-(CH2)n-CH=CH-(CH2)(16-n)-H
I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1680
11/24/08 1:57:00 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1681
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 112-88-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
1-Octadecene
H2C=CH-(CH2)15-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Octadecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)15-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)14-CH3
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)14-CH3
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, 16-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)12-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, 16-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, 17-methyl-, (Z)-
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)13-CH(CH3)2
1
0
0
2-Octadecene, 17-methyl-, (E)
26764-26-1
1
1
1
Octadecenoic acid
112-79-8
1
1
1
Octadecenoic acid, (E)-
27104-13-8
0
1
0
Octadecenoic acid, (Z)-
93976-10-4
1
1
1
Octadecenoic acid, docosyl ester, (Z)-
I.B-1 I.B-1
{oleic acid}
IV.A-3
{elaidic acid}
IV.A-3 IV.A-3 V-3
1
1
1
Octadecenoic acid, heneicosyl ester, (Z)-
V-3
93976-08-0
1
1
1
Octadecenoic acid, hexacosyl ester, (Z)-
V-3
27234-05-5
0
1
0
Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester
V-3
93976-09-1
1
1
1
Octadecenoic acid, tetracosyl ester, (Z)-
V-3
112-80-1
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-
71607-93-7
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-hexatria contanonaenyl ester
{oleic acid}
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COOH IV.A-3 V-3
57840-35-4
1
0
0
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
V-3
36078-10-1
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)11CH3 V-3
22393-88-0
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)19CH3 V-3
111-62-6
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, ethyl ester {ethyl oleate}
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-C2H5 V-3
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)26CH3 V-3
22393-86-8
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)16CH3 V-3
112-62-9
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-CH3 V-3
17673-49-3
69454-18-8
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)18CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)17CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)24CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)14CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)23CH3 V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1681
11/24/08 1:57:01 PM
1682
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
22393-85-7
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)13CH3 V-3
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)22CH3 V-3
75164-73-7
1
1
1
9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)7-CH=CH-(CH2)7-COO-(CH2)12CH3 V-3
104077-09-0
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-2- [(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]ethyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
V-3
104077-10-3
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2ethanediyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104100-34-7
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-, 2-hydroxy-1,3-propanediyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104077-06-7
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-, 2-hydroxy-3-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]propyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)-
V-3
104077-07-8
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[[1-oxo-18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]-, 2-hydroxy3-[[1-oxo-18-[(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl)oxy]-9octadecenyl]oxy]propyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104077-11-4
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[[1-oxo-18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]-, 1(hydroxymethyl)-2-[[1-oxo-18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]ethyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104077-12-5
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[[1-oxo-18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]-, 1(hydroxymethyl)-1,2-ethanediyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104100-35-8
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[[1-oxo-18-[(1-oxo-9octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]-, 2-hydroxy1,3-propanediyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104077-08-9
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[[1-oxo-18-[[1-oxo-18-[(1oxo-9-octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy ]-9octadecenyl]oxy]-, 2-hydroxy-3-[[1-oxo-18-[[1-oxo18- [(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl)oxy]-9octadecenyl]oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]propyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
104077-13-6
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-[[1-oxo-18-[[1-oxo-18-[(1oxo-9-octadecenyl)oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy ]-9octadecenyl]oxy]-, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-2-[[1-oxo-18[[1-oxo- 18-[(1-oxo-9-octadecenyl)oxy]-9octadecenyl]oxy]-9-octadecenyl]oxy]ethyl ester, (all-Z)-
V-3
24753-52-4
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, 18-hydroxy-, (Z)-
2462-84-2
0
1
0
9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester
593-47-5
0
1
0
9-Octadecen-1-ol
Selected structures
II.A-5, IV.A-3 V-3 II.A-5
71899-42-8
0
1
0
5-Octadecyne
5392-40-5
1
1
1
2,6-Octadienal, 3,7-dimethyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-CŁC-(CH2)11-CH3
71607-91-5
1
0
0
1,6-Octadiene, 4,7-dimethyl{2,5-dimethyl-2,7-octadiene}
{citral}
I.B-1 III-12
H2C=CH-C(CH3)=CH-CH2-CH=C(CH3)2 I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1682
11/24/08 1:57:02 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1683
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
123-35-3
1
1
1
1,6-Octadiene, 7-methyl-3-methylene- {myrcene}
H2C=CH-C(=CH2)-(CH2)2-CH=C(CH3)2 I.B-1
2216-70-8
1
0
0
2,4-Octadiene, 7-methyl-
H3C-CH=CH-CH=CH-CH2-CH(CH3)2 I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-CH2-CH=CH-CH(CH3)2 I.B-1
71607-92-6
66957-95-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1
0
0
2,5-Octadiene, 7-methyl-
1
0
0
2,6-Octadiene, 2,6-dimethyl-
1
0
0
2,7-Octadiene, 2,7-dimethyl-
0
1
0
2,7-Octadiene-1,6-diol, 2,6-dimethyl-, [S-(E)]-
Chapter Table
I.B-1 I.B-1 II.A-5
0
1
0
Octadienoic acid
IV.A-3
459-80-3
0
1
0
2,6-Octadienoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl- {geranic acid}
IV.A-3
4698-08-2
0
1
0
2,6-Octadienoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)-
IV.A-3
4613-38-1
0
1
0
2,6-Octadienoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)-
IV.A-3
64090-50-2
0
1
0
5,7-Octadienoic acid, 7-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
IV.A-3
54557-54-9
0
1
0
5,7-Octadienoic acid, 7-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, (E)-
IV.A-3
70687-51-3
0
1
0
5,7-Octadienoic acid, 7-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, methyl ester
V-3
78-70-6
1
1
1
1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-
1
1
1
1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, labeled with C 14 {linalool- C}
XXV-29
115-95-7
0
1
0
1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate {linalyl acetate}
V-3
115-99-1
0
1
0
1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, formate {linalyl formate}
V-3
106-24-1
1
1
1
2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)-
{linalool}
II.A-5 HO
14
{geraniol}
II.A-5 CH2OH
106-25-2
0
1
0
2,6-Octadien-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-, (Z)-
38284-27-4
0
1
0
3,5-Octadien-2-one
30086-02-3
0
1
0
3,5-Octadien-2-one, (E,E)-
124-13-0
1
1
1
Octanal
107-75-5
0
1
0
Octanal, 7-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl{hydroxycitronellal}
111-86-4
1
1
1
1-Octanamine
H3C-(CH2)6-CH2-NH2
111-65-9
1
1
1
Octane
H3C-(CH2)6-CH3
I.A-10
1
0
0
Octane, dimethyl-
C6H12=(CH3)2
I.A-10
1
0
0
Octane, methyl-
C7H15-CH3
I.A-10
61193-19-9
{nerol}
II.A-5 III-13 III-13 H3C-(CH2)6-CH=O
III-12 III-12 XII-2
2216-34-4
0
1
0
Octane, 4-methyl-
71607-64-2
1
0
0
Octane, phenyl-
I.A-10
505-48-6
1
0
0
Octanedioic acid
20653-90-1
0
1
0
2,3-Octanediol
II.A-5
585-25-1
1
1
1
2,3-Octanedione
III-13
65716-44-1
0
1
0
2,7-Octanedione, 3,3-dimethyl-
124-07-2
1
1
1
Octanoic acid
I.A-10, I.D-1 {suberic acid}
IV.A-3
III-13 {caprylic acid}
H3C-(CH2)6-COOH
IV.A-3, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1683
11/24/08 1:57:02 PM
1684
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
14352-59-1
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, 3,3-dimethyl-
106-32-1
1
1
1
Octanoic acid, ethyl ester
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
IV.A-3 {ethyl caprylate}
V-3
111-11-5
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, methyl ester
3004-93-1
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, 2-methyl-
{methyl caprylate}
V-3
16493-80-4
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, 4-ethyl-
IV.A-3
693-19-6
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, 7-methyl-
IV.A-3
70898-30-5
1
1
1
Octanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester, (all-E)-
96937-51-8
1
0
0
Octanoic acid, oxo-
IV.A-3
V-3
III-13, IV.A-3
638-25-5
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, pentyl ester
V-3
70898-31-6
0
1
0
Octanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]-
V-3
111-87-5
123-96-6
1
1
1
1-Octanol
0
1
0
1-Octanol, 3,7-dimethyl-, acetate {tetrahydrogeranyl acetate}
1
0
0
2-Octanol
589-98-0
0
1
0
3-Octanol
78-69-3
0
1
0
3-Octanol, 3,7-dimethyl-
111-13-7
1
1
1
2-Octanone
{caprylic alcohol}
H3C-(CH2)6-CH2OH
II.A-5, XXI-3 V-3
H3C-(CH2)5-CHOH-CH3
II.A-5 II.A-5
{tetrahydrolinalool} {hexyl methyl ketone}
II.A-5 H3C-(CH2)5-CO-CH3
III-13
65716-45-2
0
1
0
2-Octanone, 7-hydroxy-3,3-dimethyl-, (±)-
106-68-3
0
1
0
3-Octanone
II.A-5, III-13
7194-85-6
1
1
1
Octatriacontane
H3C-(CH2)36-CH3
929-20-4
1
0
0
1,3,6-Octatriene
H2C=CH-CH=CH-CH2-CH=CH-CH3 I.B-1
13877-91-3
1
1
1
1,3,6-Octatriene, 3,7-dimethyl-
3779-61-1
0
1
0
1,3,6-Octatriene, 3,7-dimethyl-, (E)-
673-84-7
1
0
0
2,4,6-Octatriene, 2,6-dimethyl-
29414-56-0
1
0
0
1,5,7-Octatrien-3-ol, 2,6-dimethyl-
0
1
0
2-Octenal
III-12
0
1
0
2-Octenal, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
III-12
106-23-0
1
1
1
6-Octenal, 3,7-dimethyl-
71607-54-0
1
0
0
Octene, methyl-
{ethyl amyl ketone}
{ocimene}
III-13 I.A-10
H2C=CH-C(CH3)=CH-CH2-CH=C(CH3)2 I.B-1 I.B-1
{alloöcimene}
(H3C)2=C=CH-CH=CH-C(CH3)=CH-CH3 I.B-1 II.A-5
{citronellal}
(H3C) 2=C=CH-(CH2) 2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH=O III-12 I.B-1
111-66-0
1
0
0
1-Octene
H2C=CH-(CH2)5-CH3
I.B-1
4588-18-5
1
0
0
1-Octene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)5-CH3
I.B-1
111-67-1
1
0
0
2-Octene
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)4-CH3
I.B-1
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH-(CH2)2-CH3
592-99-4
1
0
0
4-Octene
28962-27-8
1
0
0
Octenoic acid
1470-50-4
{caprylene}
I.B-1 IV.A-3
0
1
0
2-Octenoic acid
0
1
0
2-Octenoic acid, 4-(1-methylethyl)-7-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
IV.A-3
0
1
0
4-Octenoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl- 6-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1684
11/24/08 1:57:03 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1685
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 4-Octenoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-6-(1methylethyl)-, methyl ester
Selected structures H3C
Chapter Table II.A-5, V-3
CH3 CH3
H3C
OH H3C-OOC
41654-08-4
0
1
0
4-Octenoic acid, 6-ethyl-3-hydroxy-3,7-dimethyl-
II.A-5
63892-00-2
0
1
0
5-Octenoic acid
IV.A-3
41653-97-8
0
1
0
5-Octenoic acid, (Z)-
IV.A-3
502-47-6
0
1
0
6-Octenoic acid, 3,7-dimethyl-
IV.A-3
18719-24-9
0
1
0
7-Octenoic acid
IV.A-3
3391-86-4
0
1
0
1-Octen-3-ol
18409-17-1
0
1
0
2-Octen-1-ol, (E)-
II.A-5 H3C-(CH2)4-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5
106-22-9
1
1
1
6-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-
{dl-citronellol}
II.A-5
6812-78-8 141-25-3
0
1
0
7-Octen-1-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-
{rhodinol}
II.A-5
1669-44-9
0
1
0
3-Octen-2-one
III-13
14129-48-7
0
1
0
4-Octen-3-one
III-13
124354-88-7
0
1
0
Octen-4-one, 2,6-dimethyl-, monoepoxy derivative
111-12-6
0
1
0
2-Octynoic acid, methyl ester
508-02-1
0
1
0
Olean-12-en-28-oic acid, 3-hydroxy-, (3E)-
471-53-4
1
0
0
Olean-12-en-29-oic acid, 3-hydroxy-11-oxo-, (3E,20E)-
559-70-6
1
1
1
Olean-12-en-3-ol, (3E)-
III-13, X-2 H3C-(CH2)4-CŁC-COO-CH3
V-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3
{ȕ-amyrin}
H3C
H3C
CH3
CH3
II.A-5, II.B-2
CH3 CH3
HO H3C
7006-33-9
1
1
1
Ornithine
{2,3-diaminopentanoic acid}
CH3
H 2N-(CH2)3-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
70-26-8
1
1
1
L-Ornithine
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
20197-09-5
0
1
0
L-Ornithine, N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-, (R)-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
372-75-8
0
1
0
L-Ornithine, N5-(aminocarbonyl)-
7440-04-2
1
1
1
Osmium
141093-09-6
0
1
0
1-226-Osmotin (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pMOG404 reduced)
XXII-2
141093-08-5
0
1
0
Osmotin (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pMOG404 reduced)
XXII-2
143638-31-7
0
1
0
Osmotin (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pTOL1 precursor reduced)
XXII-2
143638-32-8
0
1
0
Osmotin (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone pTOL1 reduced)
XXII-2
131553-54-3
0
1
0
Osmotin (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
142583-50-4
0
1
0
Osmotin (tobacco clone pVK5 precursor reduced)
XXII-2
{citrulline}
H2N-CO-NH-(CH2)3-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, XIII-1 Os
XX-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1685
11/24/08 1:57:03 PM
1686
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
142583-51-5
0
1
0
Osmotin (tobacco clone pVK5 reduced)
190-26-1
1
0
0
Ovalene
38284-11-6
0
1
0
7-Oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane-2,5-dione, 1,3,3trimethyl-
73051-73-7
0
1
0
7-Oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol, 1-(3-hydroxy-1butenyl)-2,6,6-trimethyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
XXII-2 I.E-6
III-13, X-2 II.A-5, X-2
OH
H3C
CH3 CH3
O
CH3 OH
68573-20-6
0
1
0
7-Oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-ol, 6-(3-hydroxy-1butenyl)-1,5,5-trimethyl-
H3C
CH3
O HO
72777-88-9
0
1
0
7-Oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-ol, 6-(3-hydroxy-1butenyl)-1,5,5-trimethyl-
470-82-6
1
1
1
2-Oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, 1,3,3-trimethyl{eucalyptol; 1.8-cineole}
II.A-5, X-2
OH
CH3
CH3
II.A-5, X-2 X-2
CH3
H3C O
CH3
72693-08-4
1
0
0
6-Oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-7-one, 8-hydroxy-1methyl-
640-06-2
1
0
0
6-Oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-7-one, 1,3,4-trihydroxy{Cyclohexanecarboxylic acid, 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxy, Ȗ -lactone; quinic acid lactone; quinide}
II.A-5 II.A-5, VI-3
OH OH
HO
C
O
O
27783-00-2
1
1
1
6-Oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-7-one, 1,3,4-trihydroxy-, (exo,exo)-
II.A-5
665-27-0
1
0
0
6-Oxabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-7-one, 1,3,4-trihydroxy-, [1S-(exo,exo)]-
II.A-5, X-2
98064-77-8
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadec-6-en-3-one, 5,11dihydroxy-1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,5S*,6E,8S*,11R*,
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 CH3
H3C OH H3C
8
11
9 1
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadec-6-en-3-one, 5,11dihydroxy-1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,5S*,6E,8S*,11S*,12S*)]-
5
7 2
4
3
CH3
O
98167-33-0
OH
6
10
CH3
O
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 CH3
H3C OH H3C
8
11
9 1
O
OH
6
10
5
7 2
3
4
CH3
CH3 O
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1686
11/24/08 1:57:04 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1687
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
98064-76-7
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) 15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadec-6-en-3-one, 5hydroxy-1,5-dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1methylethyl)-, [1R-(1R*,5S*,6E,8S*,1
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 CH3
H3C H2C 12
8
9 14
13
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadec-6-ene-2,3,5-triol, 1,5-dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2S*,3R*,5S*,6E,8
57760-48-2
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6,10-trien-5-ol, 1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2E,5S*,6E,8S*,10E,12S*)]-
5
7 2
1
CH3 4
3
CH3
O
0
OH
6
10 11
121927-14-8
Chapter Table
Selected structures
O
II.A-5, X-2
H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
H3C
OH
6
10 8
9
11
5
7
CH3
2
1
4 3
CH3
O
60047-18-9
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6,10-trien-5-ol, 1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
H3C
OH
6
10 8
9
11
5
7 2
1
CH3 4
3
CH3
O
60026-18-8
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6,10-triene, 1,11-dimethyl-5-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-
69010-30-6
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6,10-triene, 1,11-dimethyl-5-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2E,6E,8S*,10Z,12S*)]-
X-2 H3C
6
10
H3C
X-2
CH3
11
8
9
CH2
5
7 2
4
1
CH3
O
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6,10-triene, 1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C
8
6
11
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6-dien-5-ol, 1,5dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2E,5S*,6E,8R*,10S*)]-
4
H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3 OH
6
10
H2C
5
CH3
O
1
CH3
2
1
57688-98-9
X-2
CH3
10
H3C
3
11
8
9
5
7 2
CH3
O
57760-47-1
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6-dien-5-ol, 1,5dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2E,5R*,6E,8S*,12S*)]-
H3C
3
11
OH
6 9
8 1
O
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
10
H2C
CH3 4
1
7
5
2
4
CH3
3
CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1687
11/24/08 1:57:04 PM
1688
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
60047-16-7
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) 15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6-dien-5-ol, 1,5dimethyl-11-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-
Selected structures
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
H3C
Chapter Table
CH3
H2C
OH
CH3
O
102977-88-8
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6-dien-5-ol, 5methyl-11-methylene-8-(1-methylethyl)-
72693-05-1
1
1
1
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-2,6-diene, 1methyl-5,11-bis(methylene)-8-(1-methylethyl)-
H2C
CH2
CH3
O
58947-96-9
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-6,10-dien-2-one, 8-hydroxy-8,12-dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
98064-75-6
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-6,10-dien-3-one, 5-hydroxy-1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,5S*,6E,8S*,10E,
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 II.A-5, III-13, X-2 CH3
H3C
9
11 12
14
13
8
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-6,10-diene-2,8diol, 2,8,12-trimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,2S*,5R*,6E,8R*,10E,12S*)]-
CH3 4
3
O
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
3
OH
5
2
H3C
2
CH3
H3 C OH
5
7
1
O
0
OH
6
10
H3C
66890-76-4
X-2
CH3
H3C
4
7
6 10
1
CH3 8
9
CH3
O
66966-04-9
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[10.2.1]pentadeca-6,10-diene-2,8diol, 2,8,12-trimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,2R*,5R*,6E,8R*,10E,12S*)]-
H3 C OH
3
OH
5
2
H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
4
7
6 10
1
CH3 8
9
CH3
O
119613-99-9
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadec-9-en-5-one, 11,13dihydroxy-1,11-dimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,8R*,9E,11R*,13S*,14S*)]-
98064-73-4
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9-dien-6-one, 8hydroxy-4,8,14-trimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,4E,8R*,9E,11R*)]
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
H3C CH3 O
13 14
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
CH3
12 11
10
3
5
9
CH3 8
OH
1 2
4
CH3
6
7
O
152209-53-5
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9-diene-6,8-diol, 11-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-4,8,14-trimethyl-, [1S-(1R*,4E,6S*,8R*,9E,11S*,14R*)]-
II.A-5, X-2
70969-36-7
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9-diene-6,8-diol, 4,8,14-trimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, X-2
75281-93-5
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9-diene-6,8-diol, 4,8,14-trimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,4E,6S*,8S*,9E,11R*,14R*)]-
II.A-5, X-2
75281-99-1
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9-diene-6,8-diol, 4,8,14-trimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S(1R*,4E,6S*,8R*,9E,11R*,14R*)]-
II.A-5, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1688
11/24/08 1:57:05 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1689
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
75282-00-7
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[12.1.0]pentadeca-4,9-diene-6,8-diol, 4,8,14-trimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,4E,6R*,8S*,9E,11S*,14R*)]-
62498-80-0
0
1
0
15-Oxabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-2,6-diene-5,12-diol, 1,5,11-trimethyl-8-(1-methylethyl)-, [1R(1R*,2E,5S*,6E,8R*,11S*,12S*)]-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table II.A-5, X-2
OH
6
10
H3C
8
9
11
2
1
HO
5
7
O
12
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
H3C
4
CH3
3
CH3
123-69-3
1
0
0
Oxacycloheptadec-8-en-2-one, (Z)-{ambrettolide}
106-02-5
0
1
0
Oxacyclohexadecan-2-one
(CH2)8
VI-6
O
(CH2)6
{Z-pentadecalactone; exaltolide} 68985-15-9
0
1
0
O
(CH2)6
VI-6
O O
(CH2)6
Oxacyclononadec-10-en-2-one, (E)-
(CH2)8
VI-6
O O
(CH2)7
60918-97-0
0
1
0
1,3,4-Oxadiazol-2-amine, N-(4-bromophenyl)-5-(1naphthalenylmethyl)-
72962-43-7
0
1
0
E-homo-7-Oxaergostan-6-one, 2,3,22,23tetrahydroxy-, (2D,3D,5D,22R,23R,24S)-
80722-28-7
0
1
0
1-Oxaspiro[4.5]deca-2,6-dien-8-one, 2,6,10,10tetramethyl-
XII-2, XVII.D-2, XVIII.B-3 II.A-5, III-13
9 8
O
57893-27-3
0
1
0
1-Oxaspiro[4.5]decane, 6-acetoxy-2,6,10,10tetramethyl{6-acetoxydihydrotheaspirane}
CH3
H3C
H3C
7
III-13, X-2
3
4
2
10
CH3
O
6
CH3
V-3, X-2
CH3 CH3
O CH3 OOC-CH3
65620-50-0
0
1
0
1-Oxaspiro[4.5]decane, 6-hydroxy-2,6,10,10tetramethyl{6-hydroxydihydrotheaspirane}
H3C
II.A-5, X-2
CH3
O
CH3
CH3 OH
0
1
0
1-Oxaspiro[4,5]dec-7-ene, 2,10,10-trimethyl{vitispirane}
H3C
X-2
CH3 CH3
O CH2
38713-26-7
0
1
0
1-Oxaspiro[4.5]dec-2-en-8-one, 2,6,6,10tetramethyl-
H3C
CH3
O
CH3
CH3
O
III-13, X-2 19377-59-4
0
1
0
1-Oxaspiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 2,6,10,10tetramethyl-
H3C
III-13, X-2
CH3
O O
CH3
CH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1689
11/24/08 1:57:05 PM
1690
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
5259-88-1
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1,4-Oxathiin-3-carboxamide 4,4-dioxide, 5,6dihydro-2-methyl-N-phenyl{Oxycarboxin®}
XXI-3
O H N O
S
Chapter Table
O
O
1139-30-6
0
1
0
5-Oxatricyclo[8.2.0.04,6]dodecane, 4,12,12trimethyl-9-methylene-, [1R-(1R*,4R*,6R*,10S*)]{E-caryophyllene oxide}
X-2
CH3 11 10
H2C
CH3
12 1
2
9 6
8 7
5O
4
3
CH3
15769-88-7
1
1
1
2H-1,2-Oxazine, tetrahydro-2-methyl-6-(3-pyridinyl), (-)-
XVII.B-2
71607-95-9
1
0
0
2H-1,2-Oxazine, tetrahydro-3-(1-methylethyl)-6-(3pyridinyl)-
XVII.B-2
7208-05-1
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,4-dimethyl-5-butyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,4-dimethyl-5-ethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,4-dimethyl-5-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,4-dimethyl-5-propyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,5-dimethyl-4-ethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2,5-dimethyl-4-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4,5-dimethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4,5-dimethyl-2-butyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4,5-dimethyl-2-ethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4,5-dimethyl-2-(1-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4,5-dimethyl-2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-ethyl-4-methyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-methyl-
23012-11-5
20654-94-8 20662-83-3
23012-10-4
XVII.D-2 5 1
O
XVII.D-2
4
N3
CH3
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-methyl-4-butyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-methyl-5-ethyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 2-methyl-4-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-methyl-2-butyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-methyl-2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-methyl-5-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-methyl-2-propyl-
XVII.D-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1690
11/24/08 1:57:06 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1691
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-methyl-5-propyl-
XVII.D-2
1
0
0
Oxazole, 4-pentyl-
XVII.D-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Oxazole, 5-methyl-4-ethyl-
XVII.D-2
20662-84-4
0
1
0
Oxazole, trimethyl- = 2,4,5-Trimethyloxazole
XVII.D-2
2346-26-1
1
0
0
2,4-Oxazolidinedione
50471-44-8
0
1
0
2,4-Oxazolidinedione, 3-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)-5ethenyl-5-methyl{Vinclozolin®}
XIV-1, XVII.D-2 XIV-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl O
N Cl
O O
1
0
0
2,4-Oxazolidinedione, 5-ethyl-1-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.D-2
27770-23-6
1
0
0
2,4-Oxazolidinedione, 5-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.D-2
9035-73-8
0
1
0
Oxidase
XXII-2
9029-44-1
0
1
0
Oxidase, ascorbate
XXII-2
0
1
0
Oxidase, choline
XXII-2
9076-84-0
0
1
0
Oxidase, coproporphyrinogen
XXII-2
9001-16-5
0
1
0
Oxidase, cytochrome
XXII-2
9001-53-0
0
1
0
Oxidase, diamine
XXII-2
9028-71-1
0
1
0
Oxidase, glycolate
XXII-2
9027-85-4
0
1
0
Oxidase, indoleacetate
XXII-2
55326-39-1
0
1
0
Oxidase, isopentenyladenosine
XXII-2
37259-79-3
0
1
0
Oxidase, methylputrescine
XXII-2
9001-96-1
0
1
0
Oxidase, pyruvate
XXII-2
9032-21-7
0
1
0
Oxidase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
XXII-2
9032-22-8
0
1
0
Oxidase, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
XXII-2
9014-35-1
0
1
0
Oxidase, succinate
XXII-2
69671-26-7
0
1
0
Oxidase, ubiquinol
XXII-2
9002-12-4
0
1
0
Oxidase, urate
XXII-2
9002-17-9
0
1
0
Oxidase, xanthine
75-21-8
1
0
0
Oxirane
106-89-8
0
1
0
Oxirane, (chloromethyl)-
7200-26-2
1
0
0
Oxirane, 2,2-dimethyl-3-(3,7,12,16,20-pentamethyl3,7,11,15,19-heneicosapentaenyl)-, (all-E)-
X-2
75-56-9
1
0
0
Oxirane, methyl-
{propylene oxide}
X-2
96-09-3
0
1
0
Oxirane, phenyl-
{phenylethylene oxide}
X-2
77288-97-2
0
1
0
Oxiranebutanol, 3-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-Dmethyl-G-(1-methylethyl)-, [2D(DS*,GR*),3D]-
II.A-5, X-2
77288-94-9
0
1
0
Oxiranebutanol, 3-(1-hydroxyethyl)-D-methyl-G-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Oxiranecarboxylic acid, 3-methyl-3-phenyl-, ethyl ester {ethyl methylphenylglycidate}
0
1
0
2,3-Oxiranedimethanol, monopropanoate
61892-62-4
XXII-2 {ethylene oxide}
X-2 X-2, XVIII.B-3
V-3, X-2 II.A-5, V-3, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1691
11/24/08 1:57:06 PM
1692
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
556-52-5
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Oxiranemethanol
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{glycidol}
II.A-5, X-2
O CH2OH
0
1
0
Oxiranemethanol, acetate
{glycidyl acetate}
V-3, X-2
O CH2OOC-CH3
51297-34-8
0
1
0
Oxiranemethanol, 3-(1-ethyl-2-methylpropyl)-D,Ddimethyl-
7782-44-7
1
1
1
Oxygen
7782-44-7
1
1
1
Oxygen (diradical)
II.A-5, X-2 O2
XIX-5, XX-5 XXVII-1
9029-57-6
0
1
0
Oxygenase, 2,5-dihydroxypyridine 5,6-di-
XXII-2
152060-37-2
0
1
0
Oxygenase, benzoate 2-mono-
XXII-2
9077-75-2
0
1
0
Oxygenase, cinnamate 4-mono-
XXII-2
9068-40-0
0
1
0
Oxygenase, p-coumarate 3-mono-
XXII-2
9002-10-2
0
1
0
Oxygenase, monophenol mono-
XXII-2
9028-06-2
0
1
0
Oxygenase, protocollagen proline di-
XXII-2
39335-11-0
0
1
0
Oxygenase, ribulose diphosphate
7440-05-3
1
1
1
Palladium
142193-29-1
0
1
0
Parasiticein
XXII-2 Pd
XXII-2
142193-19-9
0
1
0
Parasiticein (Phytophthora parasitica reduced)
9046-40-6
0
1
0
Pectic acid
0
1
0
Pectic acid, labeled with C
0
1
0
Pectic acid, magnesium salt
65028-58-2 9000-69-5
XX-5 XXII-2 IV.A-3, VIII-3
14
0
1
0
Pectin
0
1
0
Pectin, labeled with C
14
{pectic acid- C}
XXV-29 XX-6 VIII-3
14
14
{pectin- C}
XXV-29
0
1
0
Pectinic acid
135-48-8
1
0
0
Pentacene
629-99-2
1
1
1
Pentacosane
H3C-(CH2)23-CH3
I.A-10
629-87-8
1
0
0
Pentacosane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)22-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
506-38-7
1
1
1
Pentacosane, 3-methyl-
506-38-7
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid
121877-88-1 121877-80-3
10482-74-3
IV.A-3, VIII-3 {benzo[b]naphthacene}
I.E-6
I.A-10 H3C-(CH2)23-COOH
IV.A-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1692
11/24/08 1:57:07 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1693
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
Pentacosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
Pentacosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)32-CH3
V-3
1
1
0
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)23-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
0
Pentacosanoic acid, 23-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)21-COOH IV.A-3
121877-85-8
1
1
1
Pentacosanoic acid, 23-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
129074-11-9
1
0
0
Pentacosanol
26040-98-2
0
1
0
1-Pentacosanol
H3C-(CH2)23-CH2OH
II.A-5
63785-24-0
0
1
0
1-Pentacosanol, 24-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)22-CH2OH
II.A-5
30551-31-6
1
0
0
Pentacosene
CAS No.
16980-85-1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Pentacosene
H3C-(CH2)22-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Pentacosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=CH-(CH2)22-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)21-CH3
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)21-CH3
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, 23-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)19-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, 23-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, 24-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Pentacosene, 24-methyl-, (E)-
102673-27-8
0
1
0
4,9-Pentadecadienal, 6-(acetyloxy)-8-hydroxy-4,8dimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-14-oxo-, [6R(4E,6R*,8R*,9E,11S*)]-
95360-16-0
0
1
0
4,9-Pentadecadienal, 6,8-dihydroxy-4,8-dimethyl11-(1-methylethyl)-14-oxo-, [6R(4E,6R*,8S*,9E,11S*)]-
1
0
0
Pentadecadiene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
1
0
0
4,9-Pentadecadienoic acid, 6,8-dihydroxy-4,8dimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-14-oxo-
70898-33-8
II.A-5
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)20-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1
II.A-5, V-3, III-12
II.A-5, III-12
I.B-1 II.A-5, IV.A-3, III-13 CH3
H3C
CH3
H3C
OH
O HOOC
CH3
OH
102734-50-9
0
1
0
4,9-Pentadecadienoic acid, 6,8-dihydroxy-4,8dimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-14-oxo-, methyl ester, [6R-(4E,6R*,8S*,9E,11S*)]-
II.A-5, V-3, III-13
102734-51-0
0
1
0
4,9-Pentadecadienoic acid, 6,8-dihydroxy-4,8dimethyl-11-(1-methylethyl)-14-oxo-, methyl ester, [6R-(4E,6R*,8R*,9E,11S*)]-
II.A-5, V-3, III-13
152209-55-7
0
1
0
6,11-Pentadecadien-2-one, 8,10,15-trihydroxy-8,12dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, [5S(5R*,6E,8R*,10S*,11E)]-
2765-11-9
0
1
0
Pentadecanal
68982-28-5
0
1
0
Pentadecanal, 2-ethylidene-6,10,14-trimethyl- H-
II.A-5, III-13
H3C-(CH2)13-CH=O
III-12 III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1693
11/24/08 1:57:07 PM
1694
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 629-62-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures H3C-(CH2)13-CH3
Chapter Table
1
1
1
Pentadecane
0
1
0
Pentadecane, 4-acetoxy-
I.A-10
1560-93-6
1
1
1
Pentadecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)12-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
2882-96-4
1
1
1
Pentadecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)11-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
1921-70-6
1
0
0
Pentadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
I.A-10
3892-00-0
1
0
0
Pentadecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl-
I.A-10
1460-18-0
1
0
0
Pentadecanedioic acid
HOOC-(CH2)13-COOH
IV.A-3
1002-84-2
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)13-COOH
IV.A-3
V-3
42232-23-5
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42232-14-4
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
36617-37-5
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
41114-00-5
0
1
0
Pentadecanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-CH2-CH3
V-3
42232-22-4
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
36617-34-2
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
36617-33-1
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
7132-64-1
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-CH3
V-3
36617-36-4
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
36617-35-3
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
36617-32-0 121877-44-9
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
36617-31-9
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
42232-24-6
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
36617-30-8
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)13-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3 V-3
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)11-COOH
121877-18-7
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, heptadecyl ester
H 3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)16-CH3 V-3
121877-55-2
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, pentacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)24-CH3 V-3
121877-43-8
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, tricosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)32-CH3 V-3
4669-02-7
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COOH
121877-31-4
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, docosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
IV.A-3
121877-27-8
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, eicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
121877-13-2
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, heptadecyl ester
(H 3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)16-CH3 V-3
121877-20-1
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, octadecyl ester
(H 3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)17-CH3 V-3
121877-47-2
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, tetracosyl ester
(H 3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)23-CH3 V-3
121877-38-1
1
1
1
Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, tricosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)22-CH3 V-3
0
1
0
Pentadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1694
11/24/08 1:57:08 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1695
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
71607-96-0
1
0
0
Pentadecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
629-76-5
1
1
1
1-Pentadecanol
H3C-(CH2)13-CH2OH
II.A-5
20194-48-3
0
1
0
1-Pentadecanol, 14-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)12-CH2OH
II.A-5
2345-28-0
0
1
0
2-Pentadecanone
H3C-(CH2)12-CO-CH3
III-13
502-69-2
1
1
1
2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl{phytone; hexahydrofarnesyl acetone}
H-[CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH2]3-CH2-CO-CH3 III-13
16825-16-4
0
1
0
2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl-, [R-(R*,R*)]-
81345-07-5
1
0
0
3,8,12,14-Pentadecatetraen-2-one, 8,12-dimethyl-5(1-methylethyl)-, (E,E,E)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table V-3
III-13 III-13
CH3
H3 C H3 C
CH3 O CH2
CH3
81345-08-6
1
0
0
3,8,12,14-Pentadecatetraen-2-one, 8,12-dimethyl-5(1-methylethyl)-, (E,Z,E)-
III-13
CH3
H3C H3C
CH3 CH3
O CH2
41429-55-4
0
1
0
3,7,12-Pentadecatriene-2,14-dione, 4,8-dimethyl11-(1-methylethyl)-, (E,Z,E)-
III-13 8
10 5
7 6
57760-50-6
0
1
0
3,7,12-Pentadecatriene-2,14-dione, 4,8-dimethyl11-(1-methylethyl)-, [S-(E,E,E)]-
762-29-8
1
1
1
5,9,13-Pentadecatrien-2-one, 6,10,14-trimethyl{farnesyl acetone} {3 isomers}
13
9
11
4
12 3
2
14
O O
III-13 III-13
CH3 CH3
O
CH3 H3C
CH3
1117-52-8
1
1
1
5,9,13-Pentadecatrien-2-one, 6,10,14-trimethyl-, (E,E)-
III-13
27251-68-9
1
1
1
Pentadecene
H-(CH2)n-CH=CH-(CH2)(13-n)-H
I.B-1
13360-61-7
1
1
1
1-Pentadecene
H3C-(CH2)12-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
1
1
1-Pentadecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)11-CH3
I.B-1
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)11-CH3
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, (E)-
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)12-CH3
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, 13-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)9-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, 13-methyl-, (E)-
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, 14-methyl-, (Z)-
1
1
1
2-Pentadecene, 14-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)10-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1695
11/24/08 1:57:09 PM
1696
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
2140-82-1 60976-73-0
1
1
1
1-Pentadecene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl{norphytene}
H2C=C(CH3)-CH2-{(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH2}3-H I.B-1
36232-37-8
1
0
0
6-Pentadecene, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl-
(H3C)2CH-(CH2)3-C(CH3)=CH2-{(CH2)2CH(CH3)-CH2}2-H I.B-1
26444-04-2
1
1
1
Pentadecenoic acid
31422-28-3
0
1
0
Pentadecenoic acid, methyl ester
17351-34-7
0
1
0
14-Pentadecenoic acid
764-40-9
1
1
1
2,4-Pentadienal
41050-31-1
1
1
1
Pentadiene
1
1
1
Pentadiene, methyl-
1
1
1
1,2-Pentadiene
{ethylallene}
H3C-CH2-CH=C=CH2
{piperylene}
H3C-CH=CH-CH=CH2
591-95-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
IV.A-3 V-3 IV.A-3 H2C=CH-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12 I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
504-60-9
1
1
1
1,3-Pentadiene
2004-70-8
1
1
1
1,3-Pentadiene, (E)-
I.B-1
1574-41-0
1
1
1
1,3-Pentadiene, (Z)-
1118-58-7
1
1
1
1,3-Pentadiene, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH=CH-C(CH3)=CH2
926-56-7
0
1
0
1,3-Pentadiene, 4-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-CH=CH2
I.B-1
591-93-5
1
0
0
1,4-Pentadiene
H2C=CH-CH2-CH=CH2
I.B-1
21293-29-8 14375-45-2
0
1
0
2,4-Pentadienoic acid, 5-(1-hydroxy-2,6,6-trimethyl4-oxo-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-methyl-, [S-(Z,E)]{abscisic acid}
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3 H3C
CH3
CH3
COOH OH
O
4949-20-6
1
0
0
2,4-Pentadien-1-ol
110-62-3
1
1
1
Pentanal
{valeraldehyde}
CH3
H2C=CH-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5
H3C-(CH2)3-CH=O
III-12
1
0
0
Pentanal, methyl-
123-15-9
1
0
0
Pentanal, 2-methyl-
III-12
15877-57-3
1
0
0
Pentanal, 3-methyl-
1119-16-0
1
0
0
Pentanal, 4-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)2-CH=O
7332-93-6
1
0
0
Pentanal, 2-oxo-
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-CH=O
III-12, III-13
626-96-0
1
0
0
Pentanal, 4-oxo-
H3C-CO-(CH2)2-CH=O
III-12, III-13
626-97-1
1
0
0
Pentanamide
61892-69-1
1
0
0
Pentanamide, 3-methyl-
XIII-1
1119-29-5
1
0
0
Pentanamide, 4-methyl-
XIII-1
54007-33-9
1
0
0
Pentanamide, N-ethyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-CO-NH-C2H5
XIII-1
110-58-7
1
1
1
1-Pentanamine
H3C-(CH2)4-NH2
XII-2
688-31-3
1
0
0
1-Pentanamine, 2-ethyl-N,N-dimethyl-
H3C-(CH2)2-CH(C2H5)-CH2-N(CH3)2 XII-2
625-30-9
1
1
1
2-Pentanamine
H3C-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-CH3
616-24-0
1
0
0
3-Pentanamine
(H3C-CH2)2=CH-NH2
109-66-0
1
1
1
Pentane
H3C-(CH2)3-CH3
1067-20-5
1
0
0
Pentane, 3,3-diethyl-
I.A-10
H3C-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CH=O
III-12 III-12
{valeramide}
H3C-(CH2)3-CO-NH2
III-12
XIII-1
XII-2 XII-2 I.A-10
108-08-7
1
0
0
Pentane, 2,4-dimethyl-
I.A-10
43133-95-5
1
0
0
Pentane, methyl-
I.A-10
107-83-5
1
1
1
Pentane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1696
11/24/08 1:57:10 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1697
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
96-14-0
1
1
1
Pentane, 3-methyl-
760-21-4
1
0
0
Pentane, 3-methylene-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures (H3C-CH2)2=CH-CH3
{2-ethyl-1-butene}
I.A-10
(H3C-CH2)2=C=CH2
I.B-1
628-05-7
1
0
0
Pentane, 1-nitro-
H3C-(CH2)3-CH2-NO2
XVI-1
4609-89-6
1
0
0
Pentane, 2-nitro-
H3C-(CH2)2-CH(NO2)-CH3
XVI-1
0
1
0
1,5-Pentanediamide, 2-amino- {glutamine amide}
H2N-OC-(CH2)2-CH(NH2)-CO-NH2 XII-2, XIII-1
0
1
0
1,5-Pentanediamine
H2N-(CH2)5-NH2
462-94-2
{cadaverine}
110-94-1
1
1
1
Pentanedioic acid
63892-02-4
0
1
0
Pentanedioic acid, 2-(1-methylethyl)-, (S)-
HOOC-(CH2)2-CH[CH(CH3)2]-COOH IV.A-3
617-62-9
0
1
0
Pentanedioic acid, 2-methyl-
HOOC-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-COOH
328-50-7
1
1
1
Pentanedioic acid, 2-oxo-
626-51-7
1
0
0
Pentanedioic acid, 3-methyl-
HOOC-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-COOH IV.A-3
0
1
0
Pentanedioic acid, 2,3,4-trihydroxy-
HOOC-(CHOH)3-COOH
1
0
0
1,3-Pentanediol
II.A-5
1
0
0
1,4-Pentanediol, 3-[2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1,3,3trimethylcyclohexyl]-
II.A-5
107-41-5
1
1
1
2,4-Pentanediol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
52786-29-5
1
0
0
1,4-Pentanedione, 1-(2-furanyl)-
III-13
3174-67-2
{glutaric acid}
XII-2
{D-ketoglutaric acid}
HOOC-(CH2)3-COOH
HOOC-(CH2)2-CO-COOH
IV.A-3
IV.A-3
III-13, IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
600-14-6
1
1
1
2,3-Pentanedione
H3C-CH2-CO-CO-CH3
III-13
7493-58-5
1
0
0
2,3-Pentanedione, 4-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-CO-CO-CH3
III-13
H3C-CO-CH2-CO-CH3
III-13
123-54-6
0
1
0
2,4-Pentanedione
110-59-8
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile
69975-94-6
6339-13-5
{valeronitrile}
H3C-(CH2)3-CN
XI-2
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 2,4-dimethyl-
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-
H3C-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH(CH3)-CN
XI-2
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 3-hydroxy-4-methyl-
XI-2
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, methyl-
XI-2
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 2-methyl-
XI-2
H3C-(CH2)2-CH(CH3)-CN
XI-2
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 3-methyl-
542-54-1
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 4-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH(CH2)2-CN
XI-2
927-56-0
1
0
0
Pentanenitrile, 4-oxo-
H3C-CO-(CH2)2-CN
III-1, XI-2
110-66-7
1
0
0
1-Pentanethiol
H3C-(CH2)4-SH
XVIII.A-1
XI-2
1
0
0
1,2,5-Pentanetriol, 3-methyl-
109-52-4
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid
II.A-5
591-68-4
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, butyl ester
539-82-2
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, ethyl ester
96937-52-9
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, hydroxy-methyl-
27936-41-0
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, methyl-
624-24-8
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, methyl ester
96937-54-1
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, methyloxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
96937-53-0
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
10361-39-4
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester
{valeric acid}
H3C-(CH2)3-COOH
IV.A-3 V-3
{ethyl valerate}
H 3C-(CH2)3-COO-C2H5
V-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 IV.A-3
{methyl valerate}
H 3C-(CH2)3-COO-CH3
V-3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1697
11/24/08 1:57:10 PM
1698
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1185-39-3
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-
IV.A-3
20225-24-5
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-ethyl-
IV.A-3
617-31-2
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
488-15-3
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
498-36-2
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
54031-97-9
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-4-oxo-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
97-61-0
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 2-methyl-
6641-83-4
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-methyl-4-oxo-
{2-methylvaleric acid}
IV.A-3
70340-00-0
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-methylphenyl ester
V-3
6376-59-6
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 2-oxo-, methyl ester
V-3
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 2,5-di-(methylnitrosoamino)-
III-13, IV.A-3
R-(CH2)3-CH(R)-COOH where R = H3C-N(NO)IV.A-3, XII-2, XV-8
150-96-9
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
5980-21-2
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-4-methyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
105-43-1
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 3-methyl{ȕ-methylvaleric acid; 3-methylpentanoic acid}
5870-68-8
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 3-methyl-, ethyl ester
2177-78-8
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 3-methyl-, methyl ester
6628-79-1
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 3-methyl-4-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
10191-25-0
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 3-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3
150-97-0
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 3,5-dihydroxy-5-methyl{mevalonic acid}
II.A-5, IV.A-3
41654-03-9
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, IV.A-3
646-07-1
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 4-methyl-
2412-80-8
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 4-methyl-, methyl ester
IV.A-3 V-3 V-3
{isocaproic acid}
V-3
123-76-2
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 4-oxo-
539-88-8
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 4-oxo-, ethyl ester {ethyl levulinate}
H3C-CO-(CH2) 2-COO-CH2-CH3 III-13, V-3
624-45-3
1
1
1
Pentanoic acid, 4-oxo-, methyl ester {methyl levulinate}
H3C-CO-(CH2) 2-COO-CH3
67920-51-8
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-(acetylamino)-2-hydroxy-, (±)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, XII-2
63316-30-3
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-(acetylamino)-2-hydroxy-, (R)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, XII-2
16814-81-6
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-amino-2-hydroxy-, (S)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, XII-2
63316-28-9
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-amino-3-hydroxy-
106-60-5
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-amino-4-oxo-
0
1
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-hydroxy-3-(1-methylethyl)-
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 5-hydroxy-4-oxo-, methyl ester
1
0
0
Pentanoic acid, 2,3,4,5-tetrahydroxy-
HOCH2-(CHOH)3-COOH
71-41-0
1
1
1
1-Pentanol
H3C-(CH2)3-CH2OH
6570-87-2
0
1
0
1-Pentanol, 3,4-dimethyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Pentanol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
1-Pentanol, 3-methyl-
II.A-5
66274-27-9
589-35-5
{levulinic acid}
IV.A-3 H3C-CO-(CH2) 2-COOH
III-13, IV.A-3
III-13, V-3
II.A-5, IV.A-3, XII-2 H2N-CH2-CO-(CH2)2-COOH III-13, IV.A-3, XII-2
{amyl alcohol}
II.A-5, IV.A-3 II.A-5, III-13, V-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1698
11/24/08 1:57:11 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1699
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
626-89-1
0
1
0
1-Pentanol, 4-methyl-
II.A-5
590-36-3
0
1
0
2-Pentanol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
108-11-2
1
1
1
2-Pentanol, 4-methyl-
584-02-1
0
1
0
3-Pentanol
77-74-7
1
0
0
3-Pentanol, 3-methyl-
II.A-5
1
0
0
3-Pentanol, 1-phenyl-
II.A-5
27154-67-2
1
0
0
Pentanone
III-13
63072-44-6
0
1
0
Pentanone, methyl-
III-13
1009-14-9
1
0
0
1-Pentanone, 1-phenyl-
H3C-(CH2)3-CO-C6H5
III-13
107-87-9
1
1
1
2-Pentanone
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-CH3
III-13
1
0
0
2-Pentanone, 1-hydroxy-
H3C-(CH2)2-CO-CH2OH
II.A-5, III-13
4161-60-8
1
1
1
2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-
H3C-CHOH-CH2-CO-CH3
II.A-5, III-13
123-42-2
1
1
1
2-Pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl{diacetone alcohol}
(H3C)2=C(OH)-CH2-CO-CH3 II.A-5, III-13
565-61-7
1
0
0
2-Pentanone, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CO-CH3 (H3C)2=CH-CH2-CO-CH3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5 (H3C-CH2)2=CHOH
II.A-5
III-13
108-10-1
1
1
1
2-Pentanone, 4-methyl-
5349-62-2
0
1
0
2-Pentanone, 4-methyl-1-phenyl-
5185-97-7
0
1
0
2-Pentanone, 5-(acetyloxy)-
H3C-COO-(CH2)3-CO-CH3
1567-93-7
1
0
0
2-Pentanone, 5-hydroxy-3-methyl-
HOCH2-CH2-CH(CH3)-CO-CH3 II.A-5, III-13
66309-84-0
1
0
0
2-Pentanone, 5-hydroxy-4-methyl-
HOCH2-CH(CH3)-CH2-CO-CH3 II.A-5, III-13
96-22-0
1
1
1
3-Pentanone
H3C-CH2-CO-CH2-CH3 (H3C)2= CH-CO-CH=(CH3)2
565-80-0
III-13 III-13 III-13, V-3
III-13
1
0
0
3-Pentanone, 2,4-dimethyl-
1
0
0
3-Pentanone, 1-(methylthio)-
565-69-5
1
1
1
3-Pentanone, 2-methyl-
222-93-5
1
0
0
Pentaphene {dibenzo[b,j]phenanthrene; 2,3,6,7dibenzophenanethrene}
488-31-3
0
1
0
Pentaric acid
IV.A-3
320-77-4
0
1
0
Pentaric acid, 3-carboxy-2,3-dideoxy-
IV.A-3
630-07-9
III-13
III-13, XVIII.A-1 (H3C)2= CH-CO-CH2-CH3
III-13 I.E-6
1
1
1
Pentatriacontane
H3C-(CH2)33-CH3
I.A-10
0
1
0
Pentatriacontane, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)32-CH3
I.A-10
78692-70-3
0
1
0
Pentatriacontane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)31-CH3
I.A-10
21978-49-4
1
1
1
5,9,13,17,21,25,29,33-Pentatriacontaoctaen-2-one, 6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34-octamethyl-, (all-E)-
III-13
34786-54-4
0
1
0
1,5,9,13,17,21,25,29,33-Pentatriacontanonaene, 2,6,10,14,18,22, 26,30,34-nonamethyl{norsolanesene}
I.B-1
31424-04-1
1
0
0
Pentenal
764-39-6
0
1
0
2-Pentenal
1
0
0
2-Pentenal, 2,3-dimethyl-
III-12 H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12 III-12
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1699
11/24/08 1:57:11 PM
1700
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
623-36-9 5604-55-7
S
T
S T
1
0
0
2-Pentenal, 2,4-dimethyl-
III-12
1
0
0
2-Pentenal, 2-methyl-
III-12
1
1
1
2-Pentenal, 4-methyl-
III-12
0
1
0
3-Pentenal
III-12
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
4-Pentenal, 2-methyl-
III-12
3973-43-1
1
0
0
4-Pentenal, 4-methyl-
III-12
15856-96-9
1
0
0
2-Pentenamide
61892-67-9
1
0
0
2-Pentenamide, N-methyl-
70265-05-3
1
0
0
3-Pentenamide, 4-methyl-
22537-07-1
1
0
0
4-Penten-1-amine
1
0
0
Pentene
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CO-NH2
XIII-1 XIII-1 XIII-1
H2C=CH-(CH2)3-NH2
XII-2 I.B-1
1
0
0
Pentene, methyl-
109-67-1
1
0
0
1-Pentene
H3C-(CH2)2-CH=CH2
I.B-1
3404-73-7
1
0
0
1-Pentene, 3,3-dimethyl-
H3C-CH2-C(CH3)2-CH=CH2
I.B-1
763-29-1
1
0
0
1-Pentene, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)2-C(CH3)=CH2
I.B-1
760-20-3
1
0
0
1-Pentene, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-CH=CH2
I.B-1
691-37-2
1
0
0
1-Pentene, 4-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-CH=CH2
I.B-1
109-68-2
1
1
1
2-Pentene
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CH3
646-04-8
1
0
0
2-Pentene, (E)-
I.B-1
627-20-3
1
0
0
2-Pentene, (Z)-
I.B-1
625-27-4
1
0
0
2-Pentene, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH=C=(CH3)2
I.B-1
922-61-2
1
0
0
2-Pentene, 3-methyl- (Z)
H3C-CH2-C(CH3)=CH-CH3
I.B-1
I.B-1
I.B-1
616-12-6
1
0
0
2-Pentene, 3-methyl-, (E)-
4461-48-7
1
0
0
2-Pentene, 4-methyl-
I.B-1
674-76-0
1
0
0
2-Pentene, 4-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
691-38-3
1
0
0
2-Pentene, 4-methyl-, (Z)-
I.B-1
H3C-CH(CH3)-CH=CH-CH3
1724-02-3
0
1
0
2-Pentenedioic acid
5164-76-1
0
1
0
2-Pentenedioic acid, dimethyl ester
101758-45-6
0
1
0
2-Pentene-1,4-diol, 5-(decahydro-2-hydroxy2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1- naphthalenyl)-3-methyl-, [1D(3E,4S*),2E,4a
II.A-5
91238-45-8
1
0
0
4-Pentene-2,3-dione
III-13
592-51-8
1
0
0
4-Pentenenitrile
27516-53-6
1
0
0
Pentenoic acid
{glutaconic acid}
HOOC-CH2-CH=CH-COOH
I.B-1
IV.A-3 V-3
XI-2 IV.A-3
626-98-2
1
1
1
2-Pentenoic acid
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-COOH
IV.A-3
3142-72-1
1
1
1
2-Pentenoic acid, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH=C(CH3)-COOH
IV.A-3
3675-21-6
0
1
0
2-Pentenoic acid, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-C(CH3)=CH-COOH
IV.A-3
0
1
0
2-Pentenoic acid, 3-methyl-5-(2,6,6-trimethyl-1cyclohexenyl)-
10321-71-8
0
1
0
2-Pentenoic acid, 4-methyl-
1617-32-9
1
0
0
3-Pentenoic acid, (E)-
33698-87-2
1
0
0
3-Pentenoic acid, (Z)-
IV.A-3 H3C-CH(CH3)-CH=CH-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3 IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1700
11/24/08 1:57:12 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1701
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
16313-37-4
0
1
0
3-Pentenoic acid, 3-methyl-
IV.A-3
41653-93-4
0
1
0
3-Pentenoic acid, 3-methyl-, (E)-
IV.A-3
504-85-8
0
1
0
3-Pentenoic acid, 4-methyl-
591-80-0
1
1
1
4-Pentenoic acid
16386-93-9
0
1
0
4-Pentenoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-
1575-74-2
0
1
0
4-Pentenoic acid, 2-methyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
IV.A-3 H2C=CH-(CH2)2-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3 II.A-5
616-25-1
1
1
1
1-Penten-3-ol
II.A-5
2088-07-5
1
1
1
1-Penten-3-ol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
2-Penten-1-ol, (Z)
87563-33-5
0
1
0
2-Penten-1-ol, 3-methyl-5-(1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8aoctahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-, [1S-[1D(E),4aE,8aD]]-
H3C-CH2-CH=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5
87585-55-5
0
1
0
2-Penten-1-ol, 3-methyl-5-(3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8aoctahydro-2,5,5,8a-tetramethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-, [4aS-[1(E),4aD,8aE]]-
II.A-5
0
1
0
3-Penten-1-ol, 4-methyl-
II.A-5
4325-82-0
1
0
0
3-Penten-2-ol, 4-methyl-
60026-13-3
0
1
0
4-Penten-2-ol, 5-(tetrahydro-2-methyl-2-furanyl)-
1629-58-9
1
1
1
1-Penten-3-one
3712-68-8
0
1
0
1-Penten-3-one, 2,4-dimethyl-
0
1
0
1-Penten-3-one, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
1
0
0
1-Penten-3-one, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CO-C(CH3)=CH2
25044-01-3
II.A-5
II.A-5 II.A-5, X-2 H3C-CH2-CO-CH=CH2
III-13 III-13 III-13, X-2 III-13
1
0
0
2-Penten-4-one, 2,3-dimethyl-
(H3C)2=C=C(CH3)-CO-CH3
III-13
625-33-2
1
1
1
3-Penten-2-one
H3C-CH=CH-CO-CH3
III-13
3102-33-8
0
1
0
3-Penten-2-one, (E)
1118-66-7
1
0
0
3-Penten-2-one, 4-amino-
H3C-C(NH2)=CH-CO-CH3
III-13, XII-2
565-62-8
1
0
0
3-Penten-2-one, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH=C(CH3)-CO-CH3
III-13
(H3C)2=C=CH-CO-CH3
III-13
H2C=CH-CH2-CO-CH3
III-13
III-13
141-79-7
1
1
1
3-Penten-2-one, 4-methyl-
13891-87-7
1
0
0
4-Penten-2-one
{mesityl oxide}
127-42-4
0
1
0
4-Penten-3-one, 5-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1yl){methyl-D-ionone}
III-13
72692-98-9
1
0
0
Pentitol, 2,3-dideoxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5
61989-60-4
1
0
0
Pentonic acid, 2,3-anhydro-, J-lactone
491-14-5
1
0
0
Pentonic acid, 5-C-[3,5-bis(1-methylpropyl)-1cyclopenten-1-yl]-4-deoxy-
9473-19-9
1
1
1
D-erythro-Pentonic acid, 3-deoxy-, J-lactone
5803-57-6
1
0
0
Pentonic acid, 5-deoxy-, J-lactone
533-67-5
0
1
0
D-erythro-Pentose, 2-deoxy-
VI-3 II.A-5, VI-3 VI-3 VI-3
{deoxyribose}
II.A-5
OH OH HO
1
0
0
Pentoxyl radical
488-84-6
0
1
0
D-erythro-2-Pentulose = D-Ribulose
24218-00-6
0
1
0
D-erythro-2-Pentulose, 1,5-bis(dihydrogen phosphate)
O
OC5CH11 {xylulose}
HOCH2-CO-(CHOH)2-CH2OH
XXVII-1 II.A-5 II.A-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1701
11/24/08 1:57:12 PM
1702
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
627-21-4
1
0
0
2-Pentyne
9031-96-3
0
1
0
Peptidase
H3C-CŁC-CH2-CH3 XXII-2
9003-99-0
0
1
0
Peroxidase
XXII-2
72906-87-7
0
1
0
Peroxidase, ascorbate
XXII-2
0
1
0
Peroxidase, glutathione
XXII-2
1
0
0
Perylene
I.E-6
1
0
0
Perylene, alkyl-
I.E-6
64760-19-6
1
0
0
Perylene, dimethyl-
64031-91-0
1
0
0
Perylene, methyl-
24471-47-4
1
0
0
Perylene, 3-methyl-
518-85-4
1
0
0
1H-Phenalen-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-
4176-53-8
1
0
0
1-Phenanthrenamine
198-55-0
I.E-6 {at least 2 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6 I.E-6 O 1
2
III-13
3
9
10
NH2
8
XII-2
1
7
2 6
5
4
3
3366-65-2
1
0
0
2-Phenanthrenamine
XII-2
1892-54-2
1
0
0
3-Phenanthrenamine
XII-2
17423-48-2
1
0
0
4-Phenanthrenamine
XII-2
947-73-9
1
0
0
9-Phenanthrenamine
XII-2
85-01-8
1
0
0
Phenanthrene
I.E-6
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, alkyl-
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 3,6-dichloro-
20851-90-5
I.E-6 XVIII.B-3
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, dihydro-
I.E-6
776-35-2
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 9,10-dihydro-
I.E-6
71607-56-2
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, dihydrobis(methylene)-
I.E-6
29062-98-4
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
20291-72-9
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1,2-dimethyl-
I.E-6
22349-59-3
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1,4-dimethyl-
I.E-6
20291-74-1
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1,6-dimethyl-
I.E-6
483-87-4
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1,7-dimethyl-
I.E-6
7372-87-4
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1,8-dimethyl-
I.E-6
3674-66-6
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 2,5-dimethyl-
I.E-6
17980-16-4
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 2,6-dimethyl-
I.E-6
1576-69-8
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 2,7-dimethyl-
I.E-6
1576-67-6
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 3,6-dimethyl-
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1702
11/24/08 1:57:13 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1703
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 3674-69-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 4,5-dimethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, dimethylene-
I.E-6
71607-65-3
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, dimethylethyl-
I.E-6
30997-38-7
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, ethyl-
I.E-6
71607-66-4
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
71607-67-5
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, hexamethyl-
I.E-6
61128-87-8
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, methoxy-
X-2
31711-53-2
1
1
1
Phenanthrene, methyl-
I.E-6
832-69-9
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
2531-84-2
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
832-71-3
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 3-methyl-
I.E-6
832-64-4
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 4-methyl-
I.E-6
883-20-5
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 9-methyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, 1-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
I.E-6
71607-68-6
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, pentamethyl-
I.E-6
71607-69-7
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, propyl-
I.E-6
71607-70-0
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, tetramethyl{at least 5 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
30232-26-9
1
0
0
Phenanthrene, trimethyl{at least 3 isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
84-11-7
1
0
0
9,10-Phenanthrenedione {phenanthrenequinone; phenanthraquinone}
IX.B-2
O O
111924-41-5
0
1
0
1,2,8-Phenanthrenetriol, tetradecahydro-8,10adimethyl-4-methylene-5-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C 9
H3C HO
4
8 7
6
5
II.A-5
OH 1
10
2
OH
3
CH2 CH3
H3C
229-87-8
1
1
1
Phenanthridine
XVII.E-6 N
108-95-2
1
1
1
Phenol
IX.A-22
OH 6
2
5
3 4
1
0
0
Phenol, C2-alkyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, C3-alkyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, C4-alkyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, C5-alkyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, C2-alkyl-ethenyl-
1
0
0
Phenol, C4-alkyl-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, C5-alkyl-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
{2 isomers}
IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1703
11/24/08 1:57:13 PM
1704
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
1300-71-6
50984-45-7
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Phenol, alkyl-dimethoxy-
1
0
0
Phenol, diethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethoxy-4-ethenyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
IX.A-22
1
1
1
Phenol, dimethyl-
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-ethenyl-
{xylenol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-4-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-ethenyl-ethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-ethenyl-2-methoxy-
27178-34-3
1
0
0
Phenol, (1,1-dimethylethyl)-
1329-97-1
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-2-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-4-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, dimethyl-2-nitro-
1
0
0
Phenol, ethenyl-
31257-96-2 50851-69-9
IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, ethenyl-ethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, ethenyl-ethyl-methyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, ethenyl-2-methoxy-trimethyl-
IX.A-22
73850-05-2
1
0
0
Phenol, ethenyl-methyl-
IX.A-22
73850-13-2
1
0
0
Phenol, ethenyl-trimethyl-
IX.A-22
25429-37-2
1
0
0
Phenol, ethyl-
80652-16-0
1
0
0
Phenol, ethyl-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, ethyl-2-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, ethyl-methyl-
1
0
0
Phenol, ethyl-methyl-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
1
0
0
Phenol, ethyl-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
26638-03-9
1
0
0
Phenol, methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
32391-38-1
1
0
0
Phenol, methoxy-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
30230-52-5
IX.A-22
IX.A-22
1319-77-3
1
1
1
Phenol, methyl-
12167-20-3
1
0
0
Phenol, methyl-nitro-
{cresol}
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, methylpropylenyl-
1
0
0
Phenol, methyl-propyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, propenyl-
IX.A-22
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, propyl-
IX.A-22
66586-93-4
1
0
0
Phenol, tetramethyl-
IX.A-22
26998-80-1
1
0
0
Phenol, trimethyl-
IX.A-22
3180-09-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-butyl-
IX.A-22
95-57-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-chloro-
3743-22-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-(dimethylamino)-
IX.A-22, XVIII.B-3
88-18-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-
IX.A-22
695-84-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
IX.A-22, XII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1704
11/24/08 1:57:13 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1705
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
120550-69-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethenyl-6-methoxy-
135295-09-9
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethenyl-6-methyl-
94-86-0
0
1
0
Phenol, 2-ethoxy-5-propenyl{5-propenylguaethol}
90-00-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-
Selected structures
Chapter Table IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22 IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-4-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
90534-46-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-6-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
6161-62-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-3-methyl-
IX.A-22
3855-26-3
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-4-methyl-
IX.A-22
1687-61-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
IX.A-22
1687-64-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-
IX.A-22
71607-97-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-3-nitro-
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-ethyl-4-nitro-
90-05-1
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-
60825-46-9
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22, XVI-1 {guaiacol}
14
IX.A-22, X-2
14
1
0
0
Phenol- C6, 2-methoxy-, labeled with C
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
18102-31-3
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-3-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
53587-16-9
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-methylethyl)-
IX.A-22, X-2
97-54-1
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-
{isoeugenol}
IX.A-22, X-2
5932-68-3
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-, (E){trans-isoeugenol}
IX.A-22, X-2
5912-86-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-, (Z){cis-isoeugenol}
IX.A-22, X-2
97-53-0
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-
{eugenol}
IX.A-22, X-2
93-15-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-methyl-4-(2-propenyl){eugenol, methyl-}
IX.A-22, X-2
2896-66-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4,6-dimethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
93-51-6
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-methyl- {4-methylguaiacol}
IX.A-22, X-2
2785-87-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-propyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
19784-98-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-5-(1-propenyl)-, (E)-
IX.A-22, X-2
1195-09-1
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methoxy-5-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
58539-27-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-5-propyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
29275-83-0
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-6-(1-propenyl)-, (E)-
IX.A-22, X-2
29275-82-9
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-6-(1-propenyl)-, (Z)-
IX.A-22, X-2
2896-67-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-6-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
32073-24-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-propyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methoxy-trimethyl-
95-48-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methyl-
70-30-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,2'-methylenebis[3,4,6-trichloro-
114-26-1
0
1
0
Phenol, 2-(1-methylethoxy)-, methylcarbamate {Undene®; Propoxur®}
IX.A-22, X-2 {o-cresol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVIII.B-3 OOC-NH-CH3
V-3, X-2, XXI-3
O-CH(CH3)2
88-69-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-(1-methylethyl)-
{2-isopropylphenol}
IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1705
11/24/08 1:57:14 PM
1706
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1740-97-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-
499-75-2
1
1
1
Phenol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methyl-(2-methylpropyl)-
99-53-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methyl-4-nitro-
Selected structures
Chapter Table IX.A-22
{carvacrol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1
3520-52-3
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-methyl-6-propyl-
IX.A-22
89-72-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-(1-methylpropyl)-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-(1-propenyl)-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-(2-propenyl)-
IX.A-22
1745-81-9 4167-75-3
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-
88-75-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-nitro-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-phenoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
IX.A-22, XVI-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-propenyl-
IX.A-22
644-35-9
1
0
0
Phenol, 2-propyl-
IX.A-22
591-27-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-amino-
IX.A-22, X-2
108-43-0
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-chloro-
IX.A-22, XVIII.B-3
585-34-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-
88-32-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-(1,1-dimethyethyl)-4-methoxy-
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, X-2
618-45-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
IX.A-22
79755-53-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-(1-propenyl)-
IX.A-22
620-18-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-ethenyl-methyl-
IX.A-22
66164-30-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-ethenyl-4-methyl-
IX.A-22
621-34-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-ethoxy-
620-17-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 3-ethyl-
IX.A-22
1123-73-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-ethyl-2-methyl-
IX.A-22
6161-67-7
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
IX.A-22
IX.A-22, X-2
698-71-5
1
1
1
Phenol, 3-ethyl-5-methyl-
150-19-6
1
1
1
Phenol, 3-methoxy-
IX.A-22
5451-83-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-methoxy-, acetate
108-39-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-methyl-
4920-77-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-methyl-2-nitro-
2581-34-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-methyl-4-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
554-84-7
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
713-68-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-phenoxy-
621-27-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 3-propyl-
IX.A-22
98-54-4
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-
IX.A-22
99-89-8
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
IX.A-22
99-71-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-(1-methylpropyl)-
51-67-2
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-(2-aminoethyl)-
501-92-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-(2-propenyl)-
0
1
0
Phenol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-propenyl){coumaryl alcohol}
IX.A-22, X-2 V-3, X-2 {m-cresol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1
IX.A-22, X-2
IX.A-22 {tyramine}
IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22 II.A-5, IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1706
11/24/08 1:57:14 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1707
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
537-33-7
0
1
0
Phenol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2,6-dimethoxy{sinapyl alcohol}
IX.A-22, X-2
458-35-5
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2-methoxy{coniferyl alcohol}
IX.A-22, X-2
32811-40-8
0
1
0
Phenol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2-methoxy-, (E)-
IX.A-22, X-2
69056-21-9
0
1
0
Phenol, 4-(3-hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2-methoxy-, (Z)-
IX.A-22, X-2
101-53-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-(phenylmethyl)-
59832-96-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-butyl-2-methoxy-
2628-17-3
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethenyl-2-ethyl-
IX.A-22
Name (per CA Collective Index)
7786-61-0
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-ethenyl-2-methoxy-
45803-83-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethenyl-2-methyl-
Selected structures
Chapter Table
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, X-2
{4-vinylguaiacol}
IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22
123-07-9
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-ethyl-
2785-89-9
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy-
{p-ethylphenol}
IX.A-22
{ethyguaiacol}
IX.A-22, X-2
120550-71-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy-5-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
120550-70-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy-6-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
2219-73-0
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methyl-
IX.A-22
1123-94-0
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethyl-3-methyl-
IX.A-22
71607-98-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-ethyl-3-nitro-
150-76-5
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-methoxy-
106-44-5
1
1
1
Phenol, 4-methyl-
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22, X-2 {p-cresol}
IX.A-22
4427-56-9
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
119-33-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-methyl-2-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
2042-14-0
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-methyl-3-nitro-
IX.A-22, XVI-1
4074-46-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-methyl-2-propyl-
100-02-7 1988-89-2 6380-21-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-nitro-
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-phenoxy-
IX.A-22
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22, X-2
0
1
0
Phenol, 4-(1phenylethyl)-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-phenylmethyl-
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-propenyl-
IX.A-22
645-56-7
1
0
0
Phenol, 4-propyl-
2785-88-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 5-ethyl-2-methoxy-
IX.A-22
71278-12-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 5-ethyl-2-methyl-4-nitro{phenol, 3-ethyl-6-methyl-4-nitro-}
89-83-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
IX.A-22, X-2
{thymol}
IX.A-22, XVI-1 IX.A-22
5150-42-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,3-dimethoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
20578-97-6
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,3-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
526-75-0
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl-
18441-55-9
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl-6-ethyl-
{2,3-xylenol}
34883-01-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl-5-methoxy-
6665-95-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl-6-nitro{phenol, 5,6-dimethyl-2-nitro-}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22 IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22, XVI-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1707
11/24/08 1:57:15 PM
1708
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 105-67-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,4-dimethyl-
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,4-dimethyl-6-ethyl-
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,5-dimethyl-
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,5-dimethyl-6-nitro-
1006-59-3
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,6-diethyl-
IX.A-22
4130-42-1
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-ethyl-
IX.A-22
95-87-4
{2,4-xylenol}
Selected structures
IX.A-22 IX.A-22
{2,5-xylenol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, XVI-1
128-37-0
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl- {BHT}
91-10-1
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-
{syringol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, X-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-ethenyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
28343-22-8
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-ethenyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
14059-92-8
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
6638-05-7
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
20675-95-0
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-, (E)-
IX.A-22, X-2
26624-13-5
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-, (Z)-
IX.A-22, X-2
6627-88-9
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-
IX.A-22, X-2
576-26-1
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,6-dimethyl-
71526-64-2
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,6-dimethyl-4-ethenyl-
IX.A-22
10570-69-1
{2,6-xylenol}
IX.A-22
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,6-dimethyl-4-ethyl-
IX.A-22
0
1
0
Phenol, 2,6-dimethyl-4-(2-propenyl)-
IX.A-22
2033-89-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 3,4-dimethoxy-
95-65-8
1
1
1
Phenol, 3,4-dimethyl-
500-99-2
1
1
1
Phenol, 3,5-dimethoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2 {3,4-xylenol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22, X-2
108-68-9
1
1
1
Phenol, 3,5-dimethyl-
2785-85-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 3,5-dimethyl-2-methoxy-
{3,5-xylenol}
IX.A-22
71608-10-1
1
0
0
Phenol, 3,6-dimethyl-2-nitro{phenol, 2,5-dimethyl-6-nitro-}
72312-07-3
0
1
0
Phenol, 4,5-dimethoxy-2-methyl-
IX.A-22, X-2
7771-25-7
1
0
0
Phenol, 4,5-dimethyl-2-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
2219-79-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 4,6-dimethyl-2-ethyl-
IX.A-22, X-2 IX.A-22, XVI-1
IX.A-22
2896-66-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 4,6-dimethyl-2-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
123844-48-4
1
0
0
Phenol, 5,6-dimethyl-2-methoxy-
IX.A-22, X-2
3238-38-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,3,4,6-tetramethyl-
527-35-5
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-
526-85-2
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,3,4-trimethyl-
697-82-5
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,3,5-trimethyl-
2416-94-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,3,6-trimethyl-
IX.A-22 {durenol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22
{isopseudocumenol}
IX.A-22 IX.A-22
496-78-6
1
0
0
Phenol, 2,4,5-trimethyl-
118-79-6
0
1
0
Phenol, 2,4,6-tribromo-
{pseudocumenol}
IX.A-22
527-60-6
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,4,6-trimethyl-
527-54-8
1
0
0
Phenol, 3,4,5-trimethyl-
IX.A-22
732-26-3
1
1
1
Phenol, 2,4,6-tris(1,1-dimethylethyl)-
IX.A-22
IX.A-22, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 {mesitol}
IX.A-22
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1708
11/24/08 1:57:15 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1709
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
63-91-2
1
1
1
L-Phenylalanine
31105-03-0
0
1
0
L-Phenylalanine, N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)-
51064-37-0
0
1
0
Phenylalanine, ar,ar-dihydroxy-
21609-90-5
0
1
0
Phenylphosphonothioic acid, O-(4-bromo-2,5dichlorophenyl)-, O-methyl ester {Phosvel®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
C6H5-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2, IX.A-22 XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 H3CO
Cl
S P
Br
O
Cl
24861-47-0
0
1
0
Phorbine
20239-99-0
0
1
0
3-Phorbinepropanoic acid, 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-13formyl-21-(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,18-trimethyl-20oxo-, [3S- (3D,4E,21E)]-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
XVII.A-4
3147-18-0
0
1
0
3-Phorbinepropanoic acid, 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-13formyl-21-(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,18-trimethyl-20oxo-, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl ester, [3S-[3D(2E,7S*,11S*),4E,21E]]-
V-3, XVII.A-4
15664-29-6
0
1
0
3-Phorbinepropanoic acid, 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-21(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,13,18-tetramethyl-20-oxo-, [3S-(3D,4E,21E)]-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
603-17-8
0
1
0
3-Phorbinepropanoic acid, 9-ethenyl-14-ethyl-21(methoxycarbonyl)-4,8,13,18-tetramethyl-20-oxo-, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecenyl ester, [3S[3D(2E,7S*,11S*),4E,21E]]-
V-3, XVII.A-4
9013-05-2
0
1
0
Phosphatase
122319-88-4
0
1
0
Phosphatase, 2-carboxyarabinitol 1-
XXII-2
9001-77-8
0
1
0
Phosphatase, acid
XXII-2
XXII-2
9000-83-3
0
1
0
Phosphatase, adenosine tri-
XXII-2
134632-85-2
0
1
0
Phosphatase, adenosine tri- (Petunia hybrida strain 3704 mitochondria subunit 9)
XXII-2
9001-78-9
0
1
0
Phosphatase, alkaline
XXII-2
9001-52-9
0
1
0
Phosphatase, fructose di-
XXII-2
9001-39-2
0
1
0
Phosphatase, glucose 6-
XXII-2
69669-68-7
0
1
0
Phosphatase, glucose di-
XXII-2
9027-69-4
0
1
0
Phosphatase, nucleoside di-
XXII-2
9075-51-8
0
1
0
Phosphatase, nucleoside tri-
XXII-2
9055-30-5
0
1
0
Phosphatase, phosphoglycerate
XXII-2
9025-76-7
0
1
0
Phosphatase, phosphoglycolate
XXII-2
52227-92-6
0
1
0
Phosphatase, phosphorylcholine
XXII-2
37341-58-5
0
1
0
Phosphatase, phytate
XXII-2
9059-33-0
0
1
0
Phosphatase, sucrose
14265-44-2
1
1
1
Phosphate
300-76-5
0
1
0
Phosphate, 1,2-dibromo-2,2-dichloroethyl dimethyl {Naled®}
14066-20-7
0
1
0
Phosphate, dihydrogen
H2PO4
XX-5
Phosphate, monohydrogen
-2 HPO4
XX-5
0
1
0
XXII-2 -3
PO4
XX-5 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 -1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1709
11/24/08 1:57:16 PM
1710
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
20859-73-8
0
1
0
Phosphide, aluminum
AlŁP
XX-6, XXI-3
12057-74-8
0
1
0
Phosphide, magnesium
Mg3P2
XX-6, XXI-3
7803-51-2
1
1
1
Phosphine
PH3
115-26-4
0
1
0
Phosphine oxide, bis(dimethylamino)fluoro{Dimefox®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XX-6, XXI-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 N(CH3)2
F
P
O
N(CH3)2
9036-21-9
0
1
0
Phosphodiesterase, adenosine cyclic 3',5'phosphate
XXII-2
39434-01-0
0
1
0
Phosphodiesterase, nucleotide
XXII-2
12712-31-1
0
1
0
Phosphodoxin
XXII-2
9001-81-4
0
1
0
Phosphomutase, glucose
XXII-2
16672-87-0
0
1
0
Phosphonic acid, 2-chloroethyl{Ethephon®; Ethrel®}
52-68-6
0
1
0
Phosphonic acid, 2,2,2-trichloromethyl-1hydroxyethyl-, dimethyl ester {Trichlorphon®; Dylox®, Dipterex®}
98886-44-3
0
1
0
Phosphonodithioic acid, O-ethyl S-(1-methylpropyl) (2-oxo-3-thiazolidinyl){Fosthiazate®}
944-22-9
0
1
0
Phosphonodithioic acid, ethyl-, O-ethyl S-phenyl ester {Fonofos®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
OH Cl-(CH2)2-P
O OH
H3CO
H3CO
O
V-3, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
OH
CH P
CCl3
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
OC2H5
H5C2 P
S-C6H5
S
22224-92-6
0
1
0
Phosphoramidic acid, (1-methylethyl)-, ethyl 3methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl ester {Fenamiphos®; Nemacur®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
30560-19-1
0
1
0
Phosphoramidothioic acid, N-acetyl-, O,S-dimethyl ester {Orthene®; Acephate®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
10265-92-6
0
1
0
Phosphoramidothioic acid O,S-dimethyl ester {Methamidophos®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
25311-71-1
0
1
0
Phosphoramidothioic acid, O-ethyl O-2-(1methylethyl)carbonylphenyl-, (1-methylethyl) ester {Isofenphos®}
9030-26-6
0
1
0
Phosphoribosyltransferase, nicotinate
7664-38-2
0
1
0
Phosphoric acid
7757-93-9
0
1
0
Phosphoric acid, calcium salt (1:1)
470-90-6
0
1
0
Phosphoric acid, 2-chloro-1-(2dichlorophenyl)ethenyl-, diethyl ester {Chlorfenvivphos®; Birlane®}
XXI-3
XXII-2 XX-6 XX-6 V-3, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 CHCl H5C2O
O P
H5C2O
O
Cl
Cl
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1710
11/24/08 1:57:17 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1711
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
13171-21-6
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Phosphoric acid, 2-chloro-3-(diethylamino-1-methyl3-oxo-1-propenyl)-, dimethyl ester {Phosphamidon®}
Selected structures
V-3, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 CH3 H3CO
C
H3CO
0
1
0
O
V-3, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
H3CO
1
0
Phosphoric acid, diammonium salt
62-73-7
0
1
0
Phosphoric acid, 2,2,-dichloroethenyl-, dimethyl ester {DDVP; Dichlorvos®}
OC2H5
Cl
H3CO
0
Cl
Cl
O CHCl
P
O
XX-6 V-3, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 H3CO
Cl
CH=C
O
Cl
P H3CO
141-66-2
0
1
0
OC2H5
N
Cl
Phosphoric acid, 2-chloro-1-(2,4,5trichlrophenyl)ethenyl-, dimethyl ester {DDVP; Tetrachlorvinphos®}
7783-28-0
O
O P
22248-79-9
Chapter Table
O
Phosphoric acid, 3-(dimethylamino-1-methyl-3-oxo1-propenyl)-, dimethyl ester {Dicrotophos®}
V-3, XXI-3 CH3 H3CO
O
O
C
CH
P H3CO
N=(CH3)2
O
7757-86-0
0
1
0
Phosphoric acid, magnesium salt
XX-6
7778-53-2
0
1
0
Phosphoric acid, tripotassium salt
XX-6
1754-58-1
1
1
1
Phosphorodiamidic acid, N,N'-dimethyl-, phenyl ester {Diamidafos®}
V-3, XXI-3 O C6H5-O-P
NH-CH3
NH-CH3
13194-48-4
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O-ethyl-S,S, dipropyl ester {Mocap®, Ethoprop®, Prophos®, Rovokil®, Ethoprophos®}
2497-06-5
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl S-[2(ethylsulfonyl)ethyl] ester (Thiodemeton sulfone®)
298-04-4
1
1
1
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl S-[2(ethylthio)ethyl] ester {Disulfoton®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S
O
(CH2)2-CH3
P S
H3C-CH2-O
(CH2)2-CH3
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S S H3CO
P
CH3
S
CH3O
298-02-2
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl S-[2(ethylthio)methyl] ester {Phorate®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S H3CO
P
S
S
CH3
CH3O
301-12-2
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2(ethylsulfinyl)ethyl] ester {Oxydemeton methyl®}
XXI-3 O H3C-CH2-S
O
OCH3 P
(CH2)2-S
OCH3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1711
11/24/08 1:57:18 PM
1712
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
640-15-3
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2(ethylthio)ethyl] ester {Thiometon®}
950-37-8
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl-S-2,3dihydro-5-methoxy-2-oxo-1,3,4-thiadiazol-3ylmethyl ester {Supracide®; Methidathion®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 O OCH3 S
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl- S-(Įethoxycarbonylbenzyl) ester {Fenthoate®; Phenthoate®}
N
S
N H3C
2597-03-7
Chapter Table
S
P
OCH3
O
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 COOC2H5 H3CO
CH
S P S
H3CO
60-51-5
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl-S-[2methylamino)-2-oxoethyl] ester {Dimethoate®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S H3CO
H N
P
2642-71-9
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl S-[(4-oxo-1,2,3benzotriazin-3(4H)-yl)methyl] ester {Azinphos Ethyl®}
86-50-0
1
1
1
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[(4-oxo1,2,3-benzotriazin-3(4H)-yl)methyl] ester {Guthion®; Azinphos-Methyl®}
CH3
S O
CH3O
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S
O
CH2-S-P-OCH3
N
OCH3
N
N
298-04-4
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl S-(2(ethylthio)ethyl) ester {Disulfoton®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
2310-17-0
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, S-[(6-chloro-2-oxo-3(2H)benzoxazolyl)methyl] O,O-diethyl ester {Phosalone®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 Cl
O O N H5C2O
S P
H5C2O
2540-82-1
0
1
0
S
Phosphorodithioic acid, S-[2-formylmethylamino)-2oxoethyl] O,O-dimethyl ester {Formothion®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 CH3 H3CO
S-CH2-CO-N-CH=O P S
H3CO
41198-08-7
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O-(4-bromo-2-chlorophenyl)O-ethyl-S-propyl ester {Profenophos®}
14816-18-3
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(Įcyanobenzylideneamino){Phoxim®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXVIII.B-3, XXI-3 V-3, XI-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 CN S N
P (O-C2H5)2
2921-88-2
1
1
1
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro2-pyridinyl) ester {Chlorpyriphos®; Dursban®}
V-3, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XXVIII.B-3, XXI-3 H3CO
Cl
S P
H3CO
N Cl
O
Cl
13071-79-9
0
1
0
Phosphorodithioic acid, O,O-diethyl S-[(1,1dimethylethyl)thio]methyl ester {Terbuphos®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1712
11/24/08 1:57:18 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1713
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
115-90-2
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-[4(methylsulfinyl)phenyl] ester {Fensulfothion®}
56-38-2
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(4-nitrophenyl) ester {Parathion®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 V-3, XVI-1, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 H5C2O
S P
H5C2O
297-97-2
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-pyrazinyl ester {Thionazine®, Zinophos®}
O
NO2
V-3, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 N
O
P
(OC2H5)2
N
298-00-0
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl O-(4nitrophenyl) ester {Parathion-methyl®}
S
V-3, XVI-1, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 H3CO
S P
299-84-3
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl O-(2,4,5trichlorophenyl) ester {Fenchlorphos®; Phenchlorphos®}
H3CO
O
H3CO
S
NO2
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 Cl
P H3CO
Cl
O
Cl
2104-96-3
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl O-(4-bromo2,5-dichlorophenyl) ester {Bromophos®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 H3CO
Cl
S P
H3CO
Br
O
Cl
333-41-5
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-[6-methyl-2-(1methylethyl)-4-pyrimidinyl] ester {Diazinon®}
V-3, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
24017-47-8
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(1-phenyl-1H1,2,4-triazol-3-yl) ester {Triazophos®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
919-86-8
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2(ethylthio)ethyl] ester {Demeton-S-methyl®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
961-22-8
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[(4-oxo-1,2,3benzotriazin-3(4H)-yl) methyl] ester
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 O
O N N
N
CH2-S-P-OCH3 OCH3
20300-00-9
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2-[[1-methyl2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl]sulfinyl]ethyl] ester
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
2275-23-2
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2-[[1-methyl2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl]thio]ethyl] ester {Vamidothion®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
70898-34-9
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O dimethyl S-[2-[[1-methyl2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl]sulfonyl]ethyl] ester
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
122-14-5
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O,O-dimethyl O-(3-methyl-4nitrophenyl) ester {Fenitrothion®}
V-3, XVI-1, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
55-38-9
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid O,O-dimethyl O-(4methylthio)-3-methylphenyl ester {Fenthion®}
V-3, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
29232-93-7
0
1
0
Phosphorothioic acid, O-[2-(diethylamino)-6-methyl4-pyrimidinyl] O,O-dimethyl ester {Pirimiphos-methyl®}
7723-14-0
1
1
1
Phosphorus
V-3, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
P
XX-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1713
11/24/08 1:57:19 PM
1714
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1314-56-3
0
1
0
Phosphorus oxide
P2O5
XX-6
14596-37-3
0
1
0
Phosphorus, isotope of mass 32
32
XX-5
9035-74-9
0
1
0
Phosphorylase
XXII-2
9032-10-4
0
1
0
Phosphorylase a
XXII-2
0
1
0
Phosphorylase, guanosine
XXII-2
0
1
0
Phosphorylase, polynucleotide
XXII-2
9030-28-8 71010-49-6 37297-20-4
P
1
1
1
Phytadiene C
I.B-1
0
1
0
Phytodienes
I.B-1
0
1
0
Phytoalexins
0
1
0
Phytuberin
213-46-7
1
0
0
Picene
30283-95-5
0
1
0
Picene, methyl-
106-58-1
1
0
0
Piperazine, 1,4-dimethyl-
XXII-2 V-3, XXII-2
I.E-6
{benzo[a]chrysene}
I.E-6 XVII.B-2
106-55-8
1
0
0
Piperazine, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
109-01-3
1
0
0
Piperazine, 1-methyl-
XVII.B-2
109-07-9
1
0
0
Piperazine, 2-methyl-
XVII.B-2
106-57-0
1
0
0
2,5-Piperazinedione
XVII.B-2
14771-77-8
1
0
0
2,5-Piperazinedione, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
61892-78-2
1
0
0
2,5-Piperazinedione, 3-(2-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
5625-46-7
1
0
0
2,5-Piperazinedione, 3,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
5625-53-6
1
0
0
2,5-Piperazinedione, 3-methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
4526-77-6
1
0
0
2,5-Piperazinedione, 3-methyl-, (S)-
110-89-4
1
1
1
Piperidine
3350-86-5
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
{azacyclohexane}
XVII.B-2
H N
0
1
0
Piperidine, 1-acetyl-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
Piperidine, C2-alkyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Piperidine, C3-alkyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Piperidine, C4-alkyl)-
XVII.B-2
23513-39-5
1
0
0
Piperidine, 2,3-dimethyl-, cis-
XVII.B-2
19683-91-1
1
0
0
Piperidine, 2,4-dimethyl-, cis-
XVII.B-2
504-03-0
1
0
0
Piperidine, 2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
17721-95-8
1
0
0
Piperidine, 2.6-dimethyl-1-nitroso-
0
1
0
Piperidine, 2,4-di(3-pyridinyl)-
XV-8, XVII.B-2 {anatalline}
XVII.B-6
HN N
N
1484-80-6
1
0
0
Piperidine, 2-ethyl-
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1714
11/24/08 1:57:19 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1715
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
626-67-5
S T
S
T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
Piperidine, 2-ethyl-1-nitroso-
0
1
0
Piperidine, 1-methyl-
Selected structures
Chapter Table XV-8, XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
626-56-2
1
0
0
Piperidine, 3-methyl-
13603-07-1
1
0
0
Piperidine, 3-methyl-1-nitroso-
XV-8, XVII.B-2
XVII.B-2 XV-8, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Piperidine, 4-methyl-1-nitroso-
71607-72-2
1
0
0
Piperidine, (1-methylethyl)-
100-75-4
1
1
1
Piperidine, 1-nitroso-
96552-69-1
1
0
0
Piperidine, 1-(1-oxooctyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XVII.B-6
XVII.B-2 XV-8, XVII.B-2
{NPIP}
62783-95-3
1
0
0
Piperidine, 1-(1-oxopentyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XVII.B-6
77-10-1
1
0
0
Piperidine, 1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Piperidine, 1-(3-pyridinemethyl)-2-cyano-4,5didehydro-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
Piperidine, 1-(3-pyridinemethyl)-2-cyano-
71635-28-4
0
1
0
1-Piperidinecarboxaldehyde, 2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
III-12, XVII.B-6
XVII.B-6
13406-98-9
0
1
0
1-Piperidinecarboxylic acid
IV.A-3, XVII.B-2
56078-09-2
1
0
0
1-Piperidinecarboxylic acid, 2-(3-pyridinyl)-, methyl ester, (S)-
V-3, XVII.B-6
N COO-CH3
N
0
1
0
2-Piperidineacetic acid, 1-nitroso-
{NPIPAC}
IV.A-3, XV-8, XVII.B-2
535-75-1
0
1
0
2-Piperidinecarboxylic acid
{pipecolic acid}
IV.A-3, XVII.B-2
4515-18-8
1
1
1
2-Piperidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso{N-nitrosopipecolic acid: NPIC}
IV.A-3, XV-8, XVII.B-2
65445-62-7
0
1
0
3-Piperidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-
IV.A-3, XV-8, XVII.B-2
6238-69-3
0
1
0
4-Piperidinecarboxylic acid, 1-nitroso-
1121-89-7
1
0
0
2,6-Piperidinedione
IV.A-3, XV-8, XVII.B-2
{glutarimide}
4
O
1
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
3 2
N H
0
1
0
0
2,6-Piperidinedione, methoxy-
X-2, XIV-1, XVII.B-2
61892-70-4
1
0
0
2,6-Piperidinedione, 4-methoxy-
X-2, XIV-1, XVII.B-2
72692-70-7
1
0
0
2,6-Piperidinedione, methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
29553-51-3
1
0
0
2,6-Piperidinedione, 3-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
25077-26-3
1
0
0
2,6-Piperidinedione, 4-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
27154-43-4
1
0
0
Piperidinone
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
675-20-7
1
1
1
2-Piperidinone
{5-pentanelactam}
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
NH O
61891-65-4
1
0
0
2-Piperidinone, methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1715
11/24/08 1:57:20 PM
1716
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
931-20-4
1
1
1
2-Piperidinone, 1-methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
4775-98-8
1
0
0
2-Piperidinone, 6-methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
13200-35-6
1
0
0
4-Piperidinone, 2,6-dimethyl-, cis-
III-13, XVII.B-2
CH3 O
NH
CH3
69135-98-4
1
0
0
4-Piperidinone, 2,6-dimethyl-, trans-
III-13, XVII.B-2
3311-23-7
1
0
0
4-Piperidinone, 2,2,6-trimethyl-, (R)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Plastochromenol
0
1
0
Plastoquinol
IX.B-2
11005-16-6
0
1
0
Plastoquinone C
IX.B-2
12778-15-3
0
1
0
Plastoquinone D
IX.B-2
4299-57-4
0
1
0
Plastoquinone 9
{solanachromene isomer}
IX.A-22
IX.B-2 CH3
O H3C
CH3 [
CH3 ]7
CH3
H3C O
7440-06-4
0
1
0
Platinum
Pt
XX-5 XX-5 XX-5
13981-16-3
0
1
0
Plutonium, isotope of mass 238
238
15117-48-3
1
1
1
Plutonium, isotope of mass 239
239
XX-5
Pu Pu
14119-33-6
1
1
1
Plutonium, isotope of mass 240
240
7440-08-6
1
1
1
Polonium
Po
XX-5
13981-52-7
1
1
1
Polonium, isotope of mass 210
210
XX-5
25322-68-3
0
1
0
Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl), D-hydro-Z-hydroxy-
II.A-5
9032-75-1
0
1
0
Polygalacturonase
XXII-2
152415-56-0
0
1
0
Polygalacturonase (tobacco clone G27.1/G27.2 gene Npg1 precursor reduced)
XXII-2
0
1
0
Polymerase, nucleic acid deoxyribo
XXII-2
0
1
0
Polyphenoloxidase
XXII-2
Pu Po
0
1
0
Poly(U)polymerase
XXII-2
159965-71-6
0
1
0
Polyubiquitin (Nicotiana tabacum clone Ubi.U4 gene Ubi.U4)
XXII-2
101-60-0
1
1
1
21H,23H-Porphine
XVII.A-4
{porphyrin} N H N
N H N
644-00-8
1
0
0
21H,23H-Porphine-2-propanoic acid, 8,13-diethyl3,7,12,17-tetramethyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
1976-85-8
0
1
0
21H,23H-Porphine-2,7,12,18-tetrapropanoic acid, 3,8,13,17-tetrakis(carboxymethyl)5,10,15,20,22,24-hexahydro-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
9055-40-7
0
1
0
Porphobilinogenase
7440-09-7
1
1
1
Potassium
K
13966-00-2
1
1
1
Potassium, isotope of mass 40
40
XXII-2 XX-5 K
XX-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1716
11/24/08 1:57:20 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1717
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
14378-21-3
0
1
0
Potassium, isotope of mass 42
42
K
XX-5
7447-40-7
1
1
1
Potassium chloride
KCl
XX-6
12136-45-7
0
1
0
Potassium oxide
K2O
XX-6
24203-36-9
1
0
0
Potassium, ion
K
+1
XX-5
Pr
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
7440-10-0
1
1
1
Praseodymium
57-83-0
0
1
0
Pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione
145-13-1
0
1
0
Pregn-5-en-20-one, 3-hydroxy-, (3E)-
32378-60-2
0
1
0
Pregnan-20-one, 3-[(1-oxohexadecyl)oxy]-, (3E,5D)-
147-85-3
1
1
1
L-Proline
Chapter Table
XX-5 III-13 II.A-5, III-13 III-13 IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XVII.A-4
N H
COOH
147427-29-0
0
1
0
L-Proline, 1-[1-[1-(1-L-seryl-L-prolyl)-L-prolyl]-Lprolyl]-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XVII.A-4
18610-59-8
0
1
0
L-Proline, 1-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XVII.A-4
7519-36-0
1
1
1
L-Proline, 1-nitroso-
{NPRO}
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XV-8, XVII.A-4
N
COOH
NO
1
1
1
L-Proline, 1-nitroso-, methyl ester
V-3, XV-8, XVII.A-4
N
COO-CH3
NO
62137-28-4
0
1
0
L-Proline, 4-[(O-E-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1o2)-O-E-Larabinofuranosyl-(1o2)-E-L-arabinofuranosyl)oxy], trans-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XVII.A-4
62137-29-5
0
1
0
L-Proline, 4-[(O-E-L-arabinofuranosyl-(1o3)-O-E-Larabinofuranosyl-(1o2)-O-E-L-arabinofuranosyl(1o2)-E-L-arabinofuranosyl)oxy]-, trans-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XVII.A-4
51-35-4
0
1
0
L-Proline, 4-hydroxy-, trans-
30310-80-6
0
1
0
L-Proline, 4-hydroxy-1-nitroso-, trans-
II.A-5, XVII.A-4
463-49-0
1
0
0
1,2-Propadiene
123-38-6
1
1
1
Propanal
630-19-3
1
0
0
367-47-5
1
1
1
{NHPRO} {allene}
II.A-5, XV-8, XVII.A-4 H2C=C=CH2
I.B-1
{propionaldehyde}
H3C-CH2-CH=O
III-12
Propanal, 2,2-dimethyl-
{pivalaldehyde}
(H3C)3ŁC-CH=O
Propanal, 2,3-dihydroxy-
{glyceraldehyde}
142-10-9
0
1
0
Propanal, 2,3-dihydroxy-, 3-phosphate
78-84-2
1
1
1
Propanal, 2-methyl-
1646-87-3
0
1
0
Propanal, 2-methyl-2-(methylsulfinyl)-, O[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxime {Aldicarb Sulfoxide®}
{isobutyraldehyde}
III-12
HOCH2-CH2OH-CH=O
II.A-5, III-12 II.A-5, III-12
(H3C)2=CH-CH=O
III-12 III-12, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1717
11/24/08 1:57:21 PM
1718
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1646-88-4
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Propanal, 2-methyl-2-(methylsulfonyl)-, O[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxime {Aldoxycarb®}
III-12, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 O
O
116-06-3
0
1
0
Chapter Table
Selected structures
Propanal, 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)-, O[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxime {Aldicarb®}
S
N O
O
N H
III-12, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 H N
O
S
N
O
0
1
0
Propanal, 3-(nitrosomethylamino)-
1
1
1
Propanal, 2-oxo-
0
1
0
Propanal, 2-oxo-3-hydroxy-
{reductone}
3268-49-3
1
1
1
Propanal, 3-(methylthio)-
{methional}
78-98-8
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)2-CHO
{pyruvaldehyde; methylglyoxal}
III-12, XV-8
H3C-CO-CH=O HOCH2-CO-CH=O
III-12, III-13 II.A-5, III-12, III-13 III-12, XVIII.A-1
79-05-0
1
0
0
Propanamide
H3C-CH2-CO-NH2
7324-05-2
0
1
0
Propanamide, 2-amino-, (S)-
H3C-CH(NH2)-CO-NH2
563-83-7
1
0
0
Propanamide, 2-methyl-
631-66-3
1
0
0
Propanamide, 2-oxo-
61892-68-0
1
0
0
Propanamide, 3-cyano-
15299-99-7
0
1
0
Propanamide, diethyl-2-(1-naphthyloxy){Devrinol®; (Napropamide®}
XIII-1 XII-2, XIII-1
(H3C)2=CH-CO-NH2 {pyruvamide}
XIII-1
H3C-CO-CO-NH2
III-3, XIII-1
NC-CH2-CH2-CO-NH2
2675-88-9
1
0
0
Propanamide, N,2-dimethyl-
35256-85-0
0
1
0
Propanamide, dimethyl-N-(1-methylethyl)-N(phenylmethyl) {Butam®}
XI-2, XIII-1 XIII-1, XXI-3
O-CH(CH3)-CO-N=(C2H5)2
H3C-CH(CH3)-CO-NH-CH3
XIII-1 XIII-1, XXI-3
N
CH(CH3)2
O=C-C(CH3)3
5129-72-6
1
0
0
Propanamide, N-ethyl-
H3C-CH2-CO-NH-CH2-CH3
XIII-1
H3C-CH2-CO-NH-CH3
XIII-1
1187-58-2
1
0
0
Propanamide, N-methyl-
25457-49-2
1
0
0
Propanamide, N-methyl-N-(1-oxopropyl)-
XIII-1
107-10-8
1
1
1
1-Propanamine
H3C-(CH2)2-NH2
XII-2
5813-64-9
1
0
0
1-Propanamine, 2,2-dimethyl-
H3C-C(CH3)2CH2-NH2
XII-2
625-43-4
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N,2-dimethyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)CH2-NH-CH3
34419-76-6 2504-18-9
1
0
0
1-Propanamine, N,2-dimethyl-N-nitroso-
H3C-CH(CH3)CH2-N(NO)-CH3
XII-2
71607-99-3
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-ethyl-2-methyl-N-nitroso-
H3C-CH(CH3)CH2-N(NO)-CH2CH3
XV-8
25413-61-0
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-ethyl-N-nitroso-
H3C-(CH2)2-N(NO)-CH2CH3
XV-8
XII-2, XV-8
627-35-0
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)2-NH-CH3
XII-2
78-81-9
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-NH2
XII-2
1
0
0
1-Propanamine, 2-methyl-, N-butyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-NH-(CH2)3-CH3
XII-2
1
0
0
1-Propanamine, 2-methyl-, N-(2-methylpropyl)-Nnitroso-
21968-17-2
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-(1-methylethyl)-
H3C-(CH2)2-NH-CH=(CH3)2
XII-2
22023-64-9
1
0
0
1-Propanamine, N-(1-methylethylidene)-
H3C-(CH2)2-NH-C(CH3)=CH2
XII-2
924-46-9
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-
{NMPA}
XV-8
H3C-(CH2)2-N(NO)-CH3
XV-8
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1718
11/24/08 1:57:21 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1719
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
3405-42-3
1
0
0
1-Propanamine, N-methyl-N-propyl-
621-64-7
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-nitroso-N-propyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{NDPA}
(H3C-CH2CH2)2=N-CH3
XII-2
(H3C-CH2CH2)2=N-NO
XV-8
142-84-7
1
1
1
1-Propanamine, N-propyl-
(H3C-CH2CH2)2=NH
XII-2
7239-24-9
0
1
0
1-Propanamine, N,N,2-trimethyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH2-N=(CH3)2
XII-2
75-31-0
1
1
1
2-Propanamine
(H3C)2=CH-NH2
XII-2
75-64-9
1
1
1
2-Propanamine, 2-methyl-
(H3C)3ŁC-NH2
XII-2
7515-80-2
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, 2-methyl-N-(1-methylethyl)-
(H3C)3ŁC-NH-CH(CH3)2
XII-2
3376-24-7
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, 2-methyl-N-(phenylmethylene)-, Noxide
XII-2
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, N-(2,2-dimethylethyl)-
XII-2
4747-21-1
1
1
1
2-Propanamine, N-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-NH-CH3
XII-2
108-18-9
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, N-(1-methylethyl)-
(H3C)2=CH-NH-CH=(CH3)2
XII-2
[(H3C)2=CH]2-N-NO
XV-8
601-77-4
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, N-(1-methylethyl)-N-nitroso
3332-08-9
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, N-(1-methylethylidene)-
XII-2
1
0
0
2-Propanamine, N-(2-methylpropyl)-
XII-2
1
1
1
2-Propanamine, N-propyl-
74-98-6
1
0
0
Propane
96-12-8
0
1
0
Propane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloro-
78-87-5
0
1
0
Propane, 1,2-dichloro-
XII-2 H3C-CH2-CH3 {DBCP®}
I.A-10 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
142-28-9
0
1
0
Propane, 1,3-dichloro-
4110-50-3
1
0
0
Propane, 1-(ethylthio)-
H3C-(CH2)2-S-CH2-CH3
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XVIII.A-1
3877-15-4
1
0
0
Propane, 1-(methylthio)-
H3C-(CH2)2-S-CH3
XVIII.A-1
505-84-0
1
0
0
Propane, 1,1'-[methylenebis(oxy)]bis-
76-19-7
0
1
0
Propane, octafluoro{Freon® 218; Perfluoropropane}
CF3CF2CF3
111-43-3
1
0
0
Propane, 1,1'-oxybis-
{dipropyl ether}
[H3C-(CH2)2]2=O
X-2
111-47-7
1
0
0
Propane, 1,1'-thiobis-
{dipropyl sulfide}
[H3C-(CH2)2]2=S
XVIII.A-1
592-65-4
1
0
0
Propane, 1,1'-thiobis[2-methyl- {diisobutyl sulfide}
[(H 3C)2=CH)2]2=S
XVIII.A-1
108-03-2
1
0
0
Propane, 1-nitro-
H3C-(CH2)2-NO2
XVI-1
75-28-5
1
0
0
Propane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CH3
I.A-10
79-46-9
1
0
0
Propane, 2-nitro-
(H3C)2=CH-NO2
XVI-1
X-2
{isobutane}
XVIII.B-3
542-78-9
1
0
0
Propanedial
H2C=(CHO)2
4464-20-4
1
0
0
Propanedial, dihydroxy-
(HO)2=C=(CH=O)2
II.A-5, III-12
O=C=(CHO)2
III-12, III-13
497-16-5
1
0
0
Propanedial, oxo-
56-18-8
1
0
0
1,3-Propanediamine, N-3-aminopropyl){norspermidine}
141-82-2
1
1
1
Propanedioic acid
{malonic acid}
III-12
XII-2 H2C=(COOH)2
IV.A-3
108-59-8
0
1
0
Propanedioic acid, dimethyl ester
H2C=(COO-CH3)2
V-3
80-69-3
1
1
1
Propanedioic acid, hydroxy-
HO-CH=(COOH)2
II.A-5, IV.A-3
516-05-2
0
1
0
Propanedioic acid, methyl-
H3C-CH=(COOH)2
IV.A-3
607-81-8
1
0
0
Propanedioic acid, (phenylmethyl)-, diethyl ester
57-55-6
1
1
1
1,2-Propanediol
{propylene glycol}
V-3 H3C-CHOH-CH2OH
II.A5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1719
11/24/08 1:57:22 PM
1720
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
627-69-0
1
1
1
1,2-Propanediol, 1-acetate
H3C-CHOH-CH2-OOC-CH3
II.A5, V-3
6214-01-3
1
1
1
1,2-Propanediol, 2-acetate
H3C-CH(OOC-CH3)-CH2OH
II.A5, V-3
Cl-CH2-CHOH-CH2OH
96-24-2
1
0
0
1,2-Propanediol, 3-chloro-
10602-14-9
0
1
0
1,2-Propanediol, 1-(dihydrogen phosphate)
II.A5, XVIII.B-3 II.A-5
20390-21-0
1
0
0
1,2-Propanediol, 3-(furfuryloxy)-
115888-33-0
0
1
0
1,2-Propanediol, 2-(1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro8,8a-dimethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-, [2S[2D(S*),8D,8aE]]-
II. A-5, X-2 II.A-5
99694-82-3
0
1
0
1,2-Propanediol, 2-(1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro8,8a-dimethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-, [2R[2D(S*),8E,8aD]]-
II.A-5
115788-21-1
0
1
0
1,2-Propanediol, 2-(1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-3hydroxy-8,8a-dimethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-, [2S[2D(S*),3D,8E,8aD]]-
II.A-5
115788-20-0
0
1
0
1,2-Propanediol, 2-(1,2,3,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-5hydroxy-8,8a-dimethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-, [2R[2D(R*),5D,8.
II.A-5
54541-18-3
1
0
0
1,2-Propanediol, 2-propanoate
504-63-2
1
1
1
1,3-Propanediol
II.A-5, V-3 {trimethylene glycol}
HOCH2-CH2-CH2OH
II.A-5
126-30-7
1
0
0
1,3-Propanediol, 2,2-dimethyl-
II.A-5
1438-92-2
1
1
1
1,2-Propanedione, 1-(2-furanyl)-
III-13
2034-60-8
0
1
0
1,2-Propanedione, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-
1197-20-2
1
1
1
1,2-Propanedione, 1-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
III-13, X-2 III-13
579-07-7
1
0
0
1,2-Propanedione, 1-phenyl-
107-12-0
1
0
0
Propanenitrile
III-13
78-97-7
1
0
0
Propanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-
H3C-CHOH-CN
II.A-5, XI-2
75-86-5
1
0
0
Propanenitrile, 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-
(H3C)2=COH-CN
II.A-5, XI-2
78-82-0
1
1
1
Propanenitrile, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-CN
78-67-1
0
1
0
Propanenitrile, 2-methyl-, 2,2’-azobis{Porofor-57®}
631-57-2
1
0
0
Propanenitrile, 2-oxo-
H3C-CH2-CN
{isobutyronitrile}
60153-49-3
1
1
1
Propanenitrile, 3-(methylnitrosamino)-
1738-25-6
1
0
0
Propanenitrile, 3-(dimethylamino)-
{MNPN}
111-97-7
1
0
0
Propanenitrile, 3,3'-thiobis-
107-03-9
1
0
0
1-Propanethiol
513-44-0
1
0
0
1-Propanethiol, 2-methyl-
75-33-2
1
0
0
2-Propanethiol
30810-51-6
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 1-hydroxy{isocitric acid}
XI-2
XI-2 XI-2
H3C-CO-CN
III-13, XI-2
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)2-CN
XI-2, XV-8 XI-2, XII-2 XI-2, XVIII.A-1
{propyl mercaptan}
XVIII.A-1
{isobutyl mercaptan}
XVIII.A-1
{isopropyl mercaptan}
XVIII.A-1 HO-CH-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
H-C-COOH H2C-COOH
77-92-9
1
1
1
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy{citric acid}
H2C-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
HO-C-COOH H2C-COOH
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1720
11/24/08 1:57:22 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1721
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
58308-53-5
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic-1,5- C2 acid, 2-hydroxy-, 14 14 labeled with C {citric acid- C}
3609-96-9
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, dipotassium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
1
0
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, monomethyl ester
II.A-5, V-3
18996-35-5
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, monosodium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
866-84-2
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, potassium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
68-04-2
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, sodium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
77-93-0
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetricarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-, triethyl ester {triethyl citrate}
II.A-5, V-3
56-81-5
1
1
1
1,2,3-Propanetriol
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
14
1,2,3-Propanetriol, labeled with
{glycerol} 14
XXV-29
HOCH2-CHOH-CH2OH
II.A-5
C
XXV-29 14
{glycerol- C} 61892-59-9
1
0
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate 2-formate
25395-31-7
1
1
1
1,2,3-Propanetriol, diacetate
II.A-5, V-3 {diacetin}
II.A-5, V-3
57-03-4
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-(dihydrogen phosphate)
II.A-5
927-20-8
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-(dihydrogen phosphate), magnesium salt (1:1)
II.A-5, XX-6
17603-42-8
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-(dihydrogen phosphate), sodium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
1335-34-8
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, mono(dihydrogen phosphate), potassium salt
II.A-5, XX-6
26446-35-5
1
1
1
1,2,3-Propanetriol, monoacetate
72692-68-3
1
0
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, monoformate
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, phosphatidyl-
1
0
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-propanoate, (R)-
62244-24-0 102-76-1
{monoacetin}
II.A-5, V-3 II.A-5, V-3 II.A-5 II.A-5, V-3
1
1
1
1,2,3-Propanetriol, triacetate
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, tri-9,12octadecadienatepropanoate
{triacetin}
V-3
V-3
139-45-7
1
0
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, tripropanoate
V-3
555-45-3
0
1
0
1,2,3-Propanetriol, tritetradecanoate
79-09-4
1
1
1
Propanoic acid
590-01-2
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, butyl ester
76578-14-8
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-[4-[(6-chloro-2quinoxalinyl)oxy]phenoxy]-, ethyl ester {Quizalofop-Et®}
{trimyristin}
{propionic acid}
V-3 H3C-CH2-COOH
V-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 C 2H 5 N
Cl
75-98-9
0
1
0
IV.A-3
Propanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-
{pivalic acid} {glyceric acid}
473-81-4
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-
6000-40-4
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2,3-dihydroxy-, (R)-
82546-67-6
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 3-(ethoxycarbonyl)-3-(1cyclohexenenyl)-
O
N
(H3C)3ŁC-COOH HOCH2-CHOH-COOH
O
O
O
IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 IV.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1721
11/24/08 1:57:23 PM
1722
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
50-21-5 598-82-3 97-73-4
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, anhydride
97-64-3
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, ethyl ester {ethyl lactate}
H3C-CHOH-COO-C2H5
Name (per CA Collective Index) {lactic acid}
Chapter Table
Selected structures H3C-CHOH-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3 VII-1 II.A-5, V-3
547-64-8
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, methyl ester
H3C-CHOH-COO-CH3
16595-31-6
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, sodium salt
H3C-CHOH-COO-Na
594-61-6
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-
(H3C)2=COH-COOH
820-11-1
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-(phosphonooxy)-
79-31-2
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-
97-89-2
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3,7-dimethyl-6-octenyl ester
97-62-1
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester
V-3
37704-28-2
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3,5,5-trimethyl-4-(3-oxo1-butenyl)-3-cyclohexen-1-yl ester
V-3
547-63-7
{isobutyric acid}
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-methylbutyl ester
II.A-5, V-3 II.A-5, XX-6 IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3
(H 3C)2=CH-COOH
IV.A-3 V-3
(H3C)2=CH-COO-CH3
V-3 V-3
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester
V-3
65416-14-0
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-methyl-4-oxo-4Hpyran-3-yl ester
V-3, X-2
103-93-5
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 4-methylphenyl ester {p-tolyl isobutyrate}
109-15-9
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, octyl ester
V-3
103-48-0
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylethyl ester
V-3
103-28-6
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, phenylmethyl ester
V-3
103-59-3
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propen-1-yl ester
V-3
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-methylbutyl ester
V-3
127-17-3
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-
617-35-6
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-, ethyl ester
H3C-CO-COO-C2H5 H3C-CO-COO-CH3
{pyruvic acid}
600-22-6
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-, methyl ester
3913-50-6
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-oxo-3-(phosphonooxy)-
69806-50-4
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 2-(4-(5-trifluoromethyl-2pyridyloxy)phenoxy)-, butyl ester {Fluazifop-butyl®}
V-3
H3C-CO-COOH
1
0
0
III-13, V-3 III-13, V-3 III-13, IV.A-3 X-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
F3C
O
N
4272-12-2
III-13, IV.A-5
O
O
O-(CH2)3-CH3
Propanoic acid, 3-(acetyloxy)-
H3C-COO-(CH2)2-COOH
IV.A-3, V-3
503-66-2
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-
HO-(CH2)2-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
4835-90-9
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-,2,2-dimethyl{hydroxypivalic acid}
HOH2C-C(CH3)2-COOH
II.A-5, IV.A-3
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxyphenyl-
935-13-7 1456-08-2
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 3-(2-furanyl)-
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-, methyl ester-
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 3-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, X-2 V-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1722
11/24/08 1:57:23 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1723
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
0
0
Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-, 2-methylamino-, propyl ester
2553-59-5
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-2-(phosphonooxy)-
1113-60-6
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-2-oxo-
2544-06-1
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-methoxy-
105-68-0
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-methylbutyl ester
CAS No.
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table II.A-5, V-3, XII-2 II.A-5, IV.A-3
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-3 IV.A-3, X-2 V-3
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-(methylnitrosoamino)-
13532-18-8
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-(methylthio)-, methyl ester H3C-(CH2)2-COO-CH3
{NMPA}
H3C-N(NO)-(CH2)2-COOH
IV.A-3, XV-8
103-56-0
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester {cinnamyl propionate}
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenyl-
105-38-4
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, ethenyl ester
105-37-3
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, ethyl ester
554-12-1
1
1
1
Propanoic acid, methyl ester
122-63-4
0
1
0
Propanoic acid, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl propionate}
71-23-8
1
1
1
1-Propanol
78-83-1
1
1
1
1-Propanol, 2-methyl-
108-61-2
1
0
0
1-Propanol, 2,2'-oxybis-
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, X-2
V-3, XVIII.A-1 V-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 H3C-CH2-COO-CH=CH2
{ethyl propionate}
H 3C-CH2-COO-C2H5
V-3
H3C-CH2-COO-CH3
V-3 V-3
H3C-CH2-CH2OH {isobutyl alcohol}
2396-61-4
1
0
0
1-Propanol, 3,3'-oxybis-
67-63-0
1
1
1
2-Propanol
110-98-5
1
0
0
2-Propanol, 1,1'-oxybis-
127-00-4
1
0
0
2-Propanol, 1-chloro-
0
1
0
2-Propanol, 2-(2-ethyl-1,3-dimethylcyclopenten-2yl)-
V-3
(H3C)2=CH-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5
II.A-5 II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, XVIII.B-3 II.A-5
107-98-2
0
1
0
2-Propanol, 1-methoxy-
75-65-0
1
0
0
2-Propanol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(dimethylhydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(3,5-dimethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(2-furanyl)-
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(3-furanyl)-
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(2-methylphenyl)-
{tert-butanol}
(H3C)3ŁC-OH
II.A-5
III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2
III-13
51772-30-6
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(3-methylphenyl)-
93-55-0
1
1
1
1-Propanone, 1-phenyl-
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-phenyl-3-hydroxy-
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(2-pyridinyl)-2-methyl-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
1
1
1-Propanone, 1-(3-pyridinyl)- {pyridyl ethyl ketone}
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(4-methyl-2-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Propanone, 1-(4-pyridinyl)-
III-13, XVII.B-2
{propiophenone}
III-13 C6H5-CO-CH2-CH3
III-13 II.A-5, III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1723
11/24/08 1:57:24 PM
1724
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
1-Propanone, 1-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
80933-75-1
0
1
0
1-Propanone, 1-[2-(3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyridinyl)]-
III-13, XVII.B-2
67-64-1
1
1
1
2-Propanone
592-20-1
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(acetyloxy)-
{acetone}
H3C-CO-CH3
III-13
H3C-CO-CH2-OOC-CH3
298-08-8
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-amino-
H3C-CO-CH2-NH2
78-95-5
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-chloro-
H3C-CO-CH2-Cl
10258-70-5
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-(formyloxy)-
116-09-6
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy-
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy-, 2-furoyl ester
III-13, XII-2 III-13, XVIII.B-3
H3C-CO-CH2-OOC-H {acetol}
H3C-CO-CH2-OH
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy-3-(phosphonooxy)-
122-84-9
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
496-49-1
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-
103-79-7
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-phenyl-
20194-70-1
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(tetrahydro-4-methyl-2H-pyran-2yl)-
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-[tetrahydro-(2-methyl-5methylethyl)-2-furanyl]-
III-13, V-3 II.A-5, III-13 III-13, V-3, X-2
COOCH2-CO-CH3
O
57-04-5
III-13, V-3
II.A-5, III-13 III-13 III-13, XVII.A-4 III-13 III-13, X-2 H3C
O CH3 O
III-13, X-2
CH3
CH3
38713-24-5
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-[tetrahydro-3-(1-methylethyl)-2furanyl]-, trans-
III-13, X-2
H3C
H3C
CH3 O O
39815-69-5
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-[tetrahydro-4-(1-methylethyl)-2furanyl]-
39815-68-4
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-[tetrahydro-6-methyl-3-(1methylethyl)-2H-pyran-2-yl]- {2 isomers reported}
III-13, X-2
CH3 H3C
6975-60-6
13100-05-5 5211-62-1
III-13, X-2
CH3
O
CH2-CO-CH3
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-[tetrahydro-6-methyl-4-(1methylethyl)-2H-pyran-2-yl]-
III-13, X-2
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(2-furanyl)-
III-13, X-2
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-[2-hydroxy-5-(1-methylethyl)-2methyl-1-cyclopentyl]-
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
II.A-5, III-13
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-
III-13
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(2-tetrahydrofuranyl)-
III-13
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-
18826-61-4
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(3-methylphenyl)-
6302-03-0
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(3-pyridinyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22 III-13 III-13, XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1724
11/24/08 1:57:24 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1725
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
96-26-4
S
T
S T
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-(1,5-dimethyl-6,8dioxabicyclo[3.2.1)oct-7-yl)-
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1,3-dihydroxy-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table III-13, X-2 II.A-5, III-13
0
1
0
2-Propanone, 1-(3,4-dihydro-6-methylpyran-2-yl)-
19037-58-2
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-
16695-72-0
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1ylidene)-, (E)-
III-13
16695-73-1
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(3,5,5-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1ylidene)-, (Z)-
III-13
2503-46-0
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22
770-39-8
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
III-13, IX.A-22 III-13, XVII.B-2
6304-16-1
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-(4-pyridinyl)-
13678-74-5
1
1
1
2-Propanone, 1-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
III-13, X-2 III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
III-13, X-2
50672-03-2
1
0
0
2-Propanone, 1-[5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furanyl]-
107-02-8
1
1
1
2-Propenal
636-38-4
0
1
0
2-Propenal, 2,3-dihydroxy-
78-85-3
1
1
1
2-Propenal, 2-methyl-
31704-79-7
1
0
0
2-Propenal, 2-methyl-3-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
{acrolein}
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 H2C=CH-CH=O
III-12 II.A-5, III-12
{methacrolein}
H2C=C(CH3)-CH=O
III-12 III-12, X-2
101-39-3
0
1
0
2-Propenal, 2-methyl-3-phenyl-
79407-66-2
0
1
0
2-Propenal, 3-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
III-12
874-66-8
1
0
0
2-Propenal, 3-(2-furanyl)-2-methyl-
104-55-2
1
1
1
2-Propenal, 3-phenyl-
{cinnamaldehyde}
III-12
14371-10-9
0
1
0
2-Propenal, 3-phenyl-, (E){trans-cinnamaldehyde}
III-12
122-40-7
0
1
0
2-Propenal, 3-phenyl-, Į-pentyl-
III-12
79-06-1
1
0
0
2-Propenamide
79-39-0
1
0
0
2-Propenamide, 2-methyl-
1202-41-1
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-
59001-33-1
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-N-[3-[[4[[3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2propenyl]amino]butyl]amino]propyl]{dicaffeoylspermidine}
59576-98-6
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
621-79-4
1
0
0
2-Propenamide, 3-phenyl-
61892-63-5
1
0
0
2-Propenamide, N-(1-oxopropyl)-
29554-26-5
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, N-(4-aminobutyl)-3-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl){caffeoylputrescine}
IX.A-22, XII-2, XIII-1
501-13-3
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, N-(4-aminobutyl)-3-(4-hydroxy-3methoxyphenyl)-
IX.A-22, XII-2, XIII-1
34136-53-3
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, N-(4-aminobutyl)-3-(4hydroxyphenyl)-
IX.A-22, XII-2, XIII-1
42369-86-8
0
1
0
2-Propenamide, N,N'-1,4-butanediylbis[3-(4hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-
III-12, IX.A-22 III-12, X-2
{acrylamide}
H2C=CH-CONH2
XIII-1
{methacrylamide}
XIII-1 XIII-1 IX.A-22, XII-2, XIII-1
IX.A-22, XIII-1 C6H5-CH=CH-CONH2
107-11-9
1
0
0
2-Propen-1-amine
2878-14-0
1
0
0
2-Propen-1-amine, 2-methyl-
{allyl amine; acrylamine}
XIII-1 XIII-1
X-2, IX.A-22, XIII-1 H2C=CH-CH2-NH2
XII-2
H2C=C(CH3)-CH2-NH2
XII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1725
11/24/08 1:57:25 PM
1726
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
115-07-1
1
0
0
1-Propene
115-11-7
1
0
0
1-Propene, 2-methyl-
26952-23-8
0
1
0
1-Propene, 1,2-dichloro-
{Telone®}
542-75-6
0
1
0
1-Propene, 1,3-dichloro-
{1,3-D}
2157-98-4
0
1
0
1-Propene, 1-methyl-3-(methylamino)-3-oxo-, dimethyl phosphate {Monocrotophos®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
{isobutylene}
H3C-CH=CH2
I.B-1
H3C-C(CH3)=CH2
I.B-1 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 V-3, XXI-3
OCH3 H3C-NH-CO-CH=C(CH3)-P=O OCH3
557-31-3
1
1
1
1-Propene, 3-ethoxy-
10152-76-8
1
0
0
1-Propene, 3-(methylthio)-
{allyl ethyl ether}
X-2
27817-67-0
1
0
0
1-Propene, 3-(propylthio)-
XVIII.A-1
592-88-1
1
0
0
1-Propene, 3,3'-thiobis-
XVIII.A-1
XVIII.A-1
107-13-1
1
0
0
2-Propenenitrile
126-98-7
1
0
0
2-Propenenitrile, 2-methyl-
{methacrylonitrile}
{acrylonitrile}
H2C=CH-CN
XI-2
H 2C=C(CH3)-CN
XI-2
4360-47-8
1
0
0
2-Propenenitrile, 3-phenyl-
{cinnamonitrile}
54356-27-3
1
0
0
2-Propenenitrile, 3-(3-pyridinyl)-, (E)-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
54356-28-4
1
0
0
2-Propenenitrile, 3-(3-pyridinyl)-, (Z)-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
870-23-5
1
0
0
2-Propene-1-thiol
499-12-7
1
1
1
1-Propene-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid {aconitic acid}
79-10-7
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid
138-08-9
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 2-(phosphonooxy)-
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
XI-2
XVIII.A-1 {acrylic acid}
79-41-4
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-
80-62-6
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester
31082-90-3
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(2,3-dihydroxyphenyl)-
331-39-5
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl){caffeic acid}
IV.A-3 H2C=CH-COOH
IV.A-3
{methacrylic acid}
V.A-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, IX.A-22, XXI-3 HO
COOH
HO
501-16-6
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-, (E){trans-caffeic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
4361-87-9
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-, (Z){cis-caffeic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
58994-15-3
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-, monoamide with N-(3-aminopropyl)-1,4butanediamine {caffeoylspermidine}
IX.A-22, XIII-1
2316-26-9
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-
17093-82-2
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-[4-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3hydroxyphenyl]{1-O-caffeoylglucose}
IV.A-3, X-2 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 HO
COOH
Glucose-O
14364-12-6
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-[4-(E-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-3methoxyphenyl]{1-O-feruloylglucose}
II.A-5, IV.A-3, X-2 H3CO
COOH
Glucose-O
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1726
11/24/08 1:57:25 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1727
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
14364-05-7
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-[4-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)phenyl]-
7362-37-0
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,5-dimethoxy-4hydroxyphenyl)-, (E){trans-sinapic acid}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, IV.A-3 IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2 H3CO
COOH
HO OCH3
7361-90-2
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,5-dimethoxy-4hydroxyphenyl)-, (Z){cis-sinapic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
537-73-5
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
25522-33-2
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-, (E)-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4,5-dihydroxy-3methoxyphenyl){5-hydroxyferulic acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-, (E){trans-ferulic acid}
537-98-4
IV.A-3, X-2, IX.A-22, XXI-3 H3CO
COOH
HO
1014-83-1
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-, (Z){cis-ferulic acid}
2309-07-1
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-, methyl ester {ferulic acid, methyl ester}
25429-38-3
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(hydroxyphenyl)-
539-47-9
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(2-furanyl)-
583-17-5 614-60-8
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(2-hydroxyphenyl){o-coumaric acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, X-2, XXI-3 V-3, IX.A-22, X-2 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3, X-2 IV.A-3, IX.A-22
588-30-7
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
14755-02-3
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-, (E)-
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
7400-08-0
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl){coumaric acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22, XXI-3
501-98-4
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-, (E){trans-coumaric acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
4501-31-9
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-, (Z){cis-coumaric acid}
IV.A-3, IX.A-22
14779-25-0
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(5-methyl-2-furanyl)-
IV.A-3, X-2
17570-26-2
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3-methoxyphenyl)-, (E)-
IV.A-3, X-2
621-82-9
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-
140-10-3
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, (E){trans-cinnamic acid}
{cinnamic acid}
C6H5-CH=CH-COOH
IV.A-3
IV.A-3
102-94-3
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, (Z){cis-cinnamic acid}
IV.A-3
47018-25-7
1
0
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 2-phenylethenyl ester
V.A-3
122-69-0
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 3-phenyl-2-propenyl ester {cinnamyl cinnamate}
V.A-3
103-36-6
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, ethyl ester {ethyl cinnamate}
V.A-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1727
11/24/08 1:57:26 PM
1728
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
103-26-4
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, methyl ester {methyl cinnamate}
7779-65-9
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester
V.A-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures C6H5-CH=CH-COO-CH3
Chapter Table V.A-3
122-67-8
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 2-methylpropyl ester
V.A-3
103-53-7
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, phenylethyl ester;
V.A-3
103-41-3
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, phenylmethyl ester {benzyl cinnamate}
V.A-3
122-68-9
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, 3-phenylpropyl ester {3-phenylpropyl cinnamate}
V.A-3
96-33-3
1
1
1
2-Propenoic acid, methyl ester
90-50-6
0
1
0
2-Propenoic acid, 3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-
107-18-6
1
1
1
2-Propen-1-ol
104-54-1
1
1
1
2-Propen-1-ol, 3-phenyl-
H2C=CH-COO-CH3 {allyl alcohol}
4407-36-7
0
1
0
2-Propen-1-ol, 3-phenyl-, (E)-
0
1
0
2-Propen-1-ol, 3-phenyl-, acetate, (E)-
2983-65-5
1
0
0
2-Propen-1-one, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-
94-41-7
1
0
0
2-Propen-1-one, 1,3-diphenyl-
145917-24-4
0
1
0
2-Propen-1-one, 1,3-di-3-pyridinyl-, (E)-
10152-76-8
H2C=CH-CH2OH
{cinnamyl alcohol}
21040-45-9
V.A-3 IV.A-3 II.A-5, XXI-3 II.A-5 II.A-5 V.A-3 III-13, IX.A-22, X-2
{chalcone}
III-13 III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
1-Propenylmethyl sulfide
H3C-S-CH2-CH=CH2
1
0
0
Propoxyl radical
OC3H5
1
0
0
1-Propyne
H3C-CŁCH
0
1
0
Protease
XXII-2
0
1
0
Protease, serine
XXII-2
0
1
0
Protease, sulfhydryl
XXII-2
144419-45-4
0
1
0
Protein (Arabidopsis thaliana clone G9.1 gene A9 11.6-kilodalton reduced)
XXII-2
132966-19-9
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco 27.4-kilodalton RNA-binding precursor reduced)
XXII-2
132966-16-6
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco 27.4-kilodalton RNA-binding)
XXII-2
137801-72-0
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco chloroplast clone pTB24 gene psbK)
XXII-2
139874-83-2
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco clone .lambda.18C gene RB7 reduced)
XXII-2
139874-82-1
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco clone .lambda.5A gene RB7 reduced)
XXII-2
162572-20-5
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco clone lambda T-FLO 4 gene NFL2)
XXII-2
147445-75-8
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco clone pMG15 extensin-like precursor reduced)
XXII-2
146591-93-7
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco clone PRP3g12 gene PRP3 pistilspecific proline-rich precursor)
XXII-2
162572-19-2
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco clone pTGF220 gene NFL1)
XXII-2
145895-79-0
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco flower-associated reduced)
XXII-2
155077-18-2
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco gene MST1 hydrogen ionmonosaccharide-cotransporting reduced)
XXII-2
160936-45-8
0
1
0
Protein (tobacco leaf curl virus coat)
XXII-2
74-99-7
XVIII.A-1 XXVII-1 I.B-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1728
11/24/08 1:57:26 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1729
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
155663-14-2
0
1
0
Protein CPB 20 (tobacco clone cpb20-44 antifungal reduced)
XXII-2
155663-12-0
0
1
0
Protein CPB 20 (tobacco clone cpb20-52 antifungal reduced)
XXII-2
155663-10-8
0
1
0
Protein CPB 20, prepro- (tobacco clone cpb20-52 antifungal reduced)
XXII-2
155663-13-1
0
1
0
Protein CPB 20, pro- (tobacco clone cpb20-44 antifungal reduced)
XXII-2
155663-11-9
0
1
0
Protein CPB 20, pro- (tobacco clone cpb20-52 antifungal reduced)
XXII-2
144997-83-1
0
1
0
Protein D 2 (Nicotiana sylvestris clone yaDC12/yaDC17 gene psaDa precursor)
XXII-2
144997-84-2
0
1
0
Protein D 2 (Nicotiana sylvestris clone yaDC12/yaDC17 gene psaDa)
XXII-2
146150-25-6
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-4A2 isoform reduced)
XXII-2
146150-27-8
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-4A3 isoform reduced)
XXII-2
162572-22-7
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A9)
XXII-2
162572-23-8
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A11)
XXII-2
162572-24-9
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A7)
XXII-2
162572-25-0
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A15)
XXII-2
162572-26-1
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A6)
XXII-2
162572-27-2
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A13)
XXII-2
162572-28-3
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 4A (Nicotiana tabacum clone NeIF-4A14)
XXII-2
143514-66-3
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-5A1 isoform C-terminal fragment reduced)
XXII-2
143514-67-4
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia clone NeIF-5A2 isoform reduced)
XXII-2
143514-68-5
0
1
0
Protein formation initiation factor eIF 5A (Nicotiana tabacum samsun clone NeIF-5A3 isoform reduced)
XXII-2
152745-97-6
0
1
0
Protein L 17 (tobacco clone TSC81 ribosome reduced)
XXII-2
142978-88-9
0
1
0
Protein L 27 (tobacco chloroplast clone L27-1 ribosome precursor reduced)
XXII-2
142978-89-0
0
1
0
Protein L 27 (tobacco chloroplast clone L27-1 ribosome reduced)
XXII-2
160082-04-2
0
1
0
Protein LTP (tobacco)
XXII-2
143513-70-6
0
1
0
Protein OEE 2 (tobacco strain NK326 precursor reduced)
XXII-2
9001-92-7
0
1
0
Proteinase
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1729
11/24/08 1:57:27 PM
1730
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
37205-61-1
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor
XXII-2
145090-32-0
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, PI-1
XXII-2
150474-41-2
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, prepro-TIMPa (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
150474-40-1
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, prepro-TIMPb (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
150474-44-5
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, pro-TIMPa (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
150474-42-3
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, pro-TIMPb (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
150474-45-6
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, TIMPa (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
150474-43-4
0
1
0
Proteinase inhibitor, TIMPb (Nicotiana tabacum samsun reduced)
XXII-2
551-68-8
0
1
0
D-Psicose
73-24-5
0
1
0
1H-Purin-6-amine
HOCH2-CO-(CHOH)3-CH2OH III-13, II.A-5 {adenine}
XVII.E-8
NH2 N
N
N H
N
525-79-1
0
1
0
1H-Purin-6-amine, N-(2-furanylmethyl)-
XVII.E-8
2365-40-4
0
1
0
1H-Purin-6-amine, N-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-
XVII.E-8
1214-39-7
0
1
0
1H-Purin-6-amine, N-(phenylmethyl)-
XVII.E-8
56159-42-3
0
1
0
7H-Purin-6-amine, 7-E-D-glucopyranosyl-N(phenylmethyl)-
38477-23-5
0
1
0
7H-Purin-6-amine, 7-D-glucofuranosyl-N(phenylmethyl)-
54538-20-4
0
1
0
7H-Purin-6-amine, 7-D-glucosyl-N-(phenylmethyl)-
20-73-0
0
1
0
1H-Purine
II.A-5, XVII.E-8 II.A-5, XVII.E-8 II.A-5, XVII.E-8 N
N
N
69-89-6
0
1
0
1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-
83-67-0
1
1
1
1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-3,7-dimethyl{theobromine}
XIV-1, XVII.E-8 N 7
1
0
0
1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,9-dihydro-1,9-dimethyl-
58-08-2
1
1
1
1H-Purine-2,6-dione, 3,7-dihydro-1,3,7-trimethyl{caffeine}
4 5
6
O
N
6H-Purine-2,6-dione, 1,7-dihydro-
4 5
{xanthine}
0
6H-Purine-2,6-dione, 1,7-dihydro-, C3-alkyl-
2
N CH3
XIV-1, XVII.E-8
O
O
0
6
O
N
HN
1
XIV-1, XVII.E-8 O
N
3
CH3
0
NH
XIV-1, XVII.E-8
7
1
2
CH3
N
0
O
N
3
CH3
33073-01-7
XIV-1, XVII.E-8
CH3
N
69-89-6
XVII.E-6
H N
N H
N H
XIV-1, XVII.E-8
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1730
11/24/08 1:57:27 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1731
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
73-40-5
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
6H-Purin-6-one, 2-amino-1,7-dihydro- {guanine}
Chapter Table
XII-2, XVII.C-1, XVII.E-8 O N
HN H2N
68-94-0
0
1
0
6H-Purin-6-one, 1,7-dihydro-
N H
N
{hypoxanthine}
XII-2, XVII.C-1, XVII.E-8 O N
HN
N H
25512-65-6
1
1
1
2H-Pyran, dihydro-
110-87-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran, 3,4-dihydro-
X-2 X-2
1
6
O
2 3
5 4
10141-72-7
0
1
0
2H-Pyran, 2-methyltetrahydro-
142-68-7
1
1
1
2H-Pyran, tetrahydro-
X-2 X-2
1
6
O
2 3
5 4
16409-43-1
0
1
0
Pyran, tetrahydro-4-methyl-2-(2-methylpropen-1-yl){rose oxide}
100-73-2
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-carboxaldehyde, 3,4-dihydro{acrolein dimer}
70898-35-0
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-carboxaldehyde, 3,4-dihydro-6-hydroxy3-oxo-
112468-46-9
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2,5(6H)-dione
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-4-methanol, 3,4-dihydro-2-hydroxy-
X-2 III-12, X-2 II.A-5, III-12, III-13, X-2 III-13, VI-3 1
6 5
O
OH
II.A-5, X-2
2 3
4
CH2OH
61892-96-4
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-6-methanol, 3,4-dihydro-3-hydroxy-
II.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, X-2
19752-84-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-3-ol, tetrahydro-
121198-47-8
1
0
0
Pyranone, dimethyl-
504-31-4
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one
III-13, X-2 6
O
O 2
VI-3
3
5 4
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-chloro-
VI-3, XVIII.B-3
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-
VI-3
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-4,5-dimethyl-
VI-3
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 4,5-dihydro-3-hydroxy-
VI-3
55100-07-7
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3
54657-94-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 3,4-dihydro-5-methyl-
VI-3
2381-87-5
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-4-methyl-
VI-3
21722-33-8
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-4-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
6400-69-4
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-6-propyl-
VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1731
11/24/08 1:57:28 PM
1732
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
73692-69-0
S
T
S T
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, hydroxyethyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, hydroxy-methyl-
II.A-5,VI-3
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, 3-hydroxy-
II.A-5,VI-3
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 3-hydroxy-6-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, 4-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
27593-23-3
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, 6-pentyl-
VI-3
542-28-9
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-
{6-amyl-Į-pyrone}
VI-3 {į-valerolactone}
1 5058-01-5
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-3,4-epoxy-5-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3, X-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-3-hydroxy-
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-methoxy-
II.A-5, VI-3
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-methyl-
32821-70-8
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-3-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
78094-66-3
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4,5-dimethyl-, cis-(±)-
VI-3
VI-3, X-2 VI-3
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4,6-dimethyl-
VI-3
710-04-3
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-hexyl{G-undecalactone}
VI-3
61892-56-6
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-
II.A-5, VI-3 II.A-5, VI-3
503-48-0
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-
1121-84-2
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4-methyl-
VI-3
96168-15-9
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4-methyl-6-(3,7,11trimethyldodecyl)-
VI-3
56947-55-8
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4-(1-methylethyl)-
VI-3
21754-22-3
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-4-(1-methylethyl)-, (±)-
VI-3
10413-18-0 24405-16-1
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-5,6-dimethyl-
VI-3
33691-73-5
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-5-hydroxy-
3301-94-8
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-butyl{G-nonalactone}
2610-95-9
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6,6-dimethyl-
VI-3
713-95-1
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-heptyl{G-dodecalactone}
VI-3
90-80-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-hydroxymethyl, 3,4,5trihydroxygluconic acid, G-lactone}
823-22-3
1
1
1
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-methyl-
II.A-5, VI-3 VI-3
II.A-5, VI-3 VI-3
{G-hexalactone; į -caprolactone} 21722-34-9
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-methyl-3-(1methylethyl){2 isomers indicated}
VI-3
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-methyl-4-(1methylethyl)-
VI-3
2721-22-4
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-nonyl{tetradecalactone}
VI-3
705-86-2
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-pentyl{G-decalactone}
VI-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1732
11/24/08 1:57:28 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1733
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
698-76-0
0
1
0
2H-Pyran-2-one, tetrahydro-6-propyl{G-octalactone}
28743-04-6
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-3(4H)-one
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
VI-3 6
O
III-13, X-2
2
5
O
4
1 121197-11-3
0
0
2H-Pyran-3(4H)-one, dihydro-
III-13, X-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-3(4H)-one, dihydro-4-(hydroxymethyl)-
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-3(4H)-one, dihydro-6-methoxy-
43152-89-2
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-3(4H)-one, dihydro-6-methyl-
98166-23-5
1
0
0
2H-Pyran-3(6H)-one
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2 III-13, X-2 6
O
III-13, X-2
2
5
O
4
108-97-4
1
0
0
Chapter Table
4H-Pyran-4-one
6 5
O
III-13, X-2
2 3
4 O
84302-42-1
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-
28564-83-2
1
1
1
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6methyl-
III-13, X-2 H3C
O
6 1 5
HO
4
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
2
3 OH
O
6380-97-8
1
1
1
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-2(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
38877-21-3
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-6-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-09-9
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,6-diethyl-3-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1004-36-0
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,6-dimethyl-
III-13, X-2
4940-17-4
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-butyl-3-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-16-8
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-butyl-3-hydroxy-6-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 II.A-5, III-13, X-2
4940-11-8
1
1
1
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-
131524-08-8
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-5,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-04-4
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
22639-24-3
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-ethyl-3-hydroxy-6-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
61892-88-4
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
61892-87-3
488-18-6
{ethylmaltol}
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-hydroxy-5-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-hydroxymethyl-3,5,6-trihydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2-methyl-3,5,6-trihydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3,5-dihydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 2,5-dihydroxy-3-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
61892-86-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3,5-dihydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1073-96-7
1
1
1
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3,5-dihydroxy-2-methyl{5-hydroxymaltol}
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3,5-dihydroxymethyl-2,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
496-63-9
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
40311-00-0
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1733
11/24/08 1:57:29 PM
1734
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
4940-18-5
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-(1-methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-11-3
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-(2-methylbutyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
76015-10-6
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-(2-methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-12-4
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-(3-methylbutyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-05-5
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2,5,6-trimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-02-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
2298-99-9
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
118-71-8
1
1
1
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-
131524-10-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-methyl-6-propyl-
{maltol}
II.A-5, III-13, X-2 II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-13-5
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-pentyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
4940-16-3
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-2-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-07-7
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-(1methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-14-6
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-(1methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-15-7
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-(2methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
40861-87-8
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
50671-50-6
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 3-methyl-
644-46-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 5-hydroxy-2-methyl- = 4H-Pyran4-one, 3-hydroxy-6-methyl{allomaltol}
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-06-6
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 6-ethyl-3-hydroxy-2-methyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
131524-17-9
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one, 6-ethyl-3-hydroxy-2-propyl-
II.A-5, III-13, X-2
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one-2-carboxylic acid, 5-hydroxy-
1
0
0
4H-Pyran-4-one-2-carboxylic acid, 5-hydroxy-, (1methylethyl) ester
III-13, X-2
II.A-5, III-13, IV.A-5, X-2 II.A-5, III-13, V-3, X-2 O
COO-CH(CH3)2
HO O
290-37-9
1
1
1
Pyrazine
6 5
N
N
2
XVII.B-2
3
1
1
1
Pyrazine, alkyl-
XVII.B-2
66288-42-4
1
1
1
Pyrazine, butenyl-
XVII.B-2
78210-56-7
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 3-butenyl- = Pyrazine, 2-butenyl-
XVII.B-2
29460-91-1
1
0
0
Pyrazine, butyl-
XVII.B-2
32184-51-3
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-cyclopentyl-6-methyl-
XVII.B-2
15707-24-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2,3-diethyl-
XVII.B-2
13238-84-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2,5-diethyl-
XVII.B-2
13067-27-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2,6-diethyl-
XVII.B-2
18138-05-1
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 3,5-diethyl-2-methyl- = Pyrazine, 2,6diethyl-3-methyl-
XVII.B-2
25704-73-8
1
1
1
Pyrazine, dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
5910-89-4
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2,3-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1734
11/24/08 1:57:29 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1735
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke S
T
S T
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2,3-dimethyl-6-propyl-
XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2,5-dimethyl-3-(1-methylethyl)- = Pyrazine, 3,6-dimethyl-2(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2,5-dimethyl-6-propyl-
XVII.B-2
108-50-9
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
71607-73-3
1
1
1
Pyrazine, dimethyethyl-
XVII.B-2
4177-16-6
1
1
1
Pyrazine, ethenyl-
XVII.B-2
13925-08-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethenyl-5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
13925-09-2
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethenyl-6-methyl-
XVII.B-2
13925-00-3
1
1
1
Pyrazine, ethyl- = Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-
XVII.B-2
33504-66-4
1
0
0
Pyrazine, ethylmethyl-
XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-5-ethylene-
XVII.B-2
25680-58-4
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-3-methoxy-
X-2, XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-5-methoxy-
X-2, XVII.B-2 X-2, XVII.B-2
CAS No.
123-32-0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-6-methoxy-
15707-23-0
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-3-methyl-
XVII.B-2
13360-64-0
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
13925-03-6
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-6-methyl- = Pyrazine, 6-ethyl-2methyl-
XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-3,5,6-trimethyl-
XVII.B-2
13360-65-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-3,6-dimethyl- = Pyrazine, 6-ethyl2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
13925-07-0
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- = Pyrazine, 3-ethyl2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
15707-34-3
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-ethyl-5,6-dimethyl- = Pyrazine, 5-ethyl2,3-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
32736-95-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-furanyl-
29460-98-8
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 3-furanyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
36238-34-3
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 5-(2-furanyl)-2,3-dimethyl- = Pyrazine, 2(2-furanyl)-5,6-dimethyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
27610-38-4
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-(2-furanyl)-5-methyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
32737-03-4
1
1
1
Pyrazine, 2-(2-furanyl)-6-methyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
29461-10-7
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-(3-furanyl)-5-methyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
3149-28-8
0
1
0
Pyrazine, methoxy-
X-2, XVII.B-2
2847-30-5
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 3-methoxy-2-methyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
2882-22-6
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 5-methoxy-2-methyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
2882-21-5
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 6-methoxy-2-methyl-
X-2, XVII.B-2
X-2, XVII.B-2
109-08-0
1
1
1
Pyrazine, methyl- = Pyrazine, 2-methyl-
XVII.B-2
38713-41-6
1
1
1
Pyrazine, (1-methylethenyl)-
XVII.B-2
29460-90-0
0
1
0
Pyrazine, (1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
34514-52-8
1
0
0
Pyrazine, methyl(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-3-butyl-
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1735
11/24/08 1:57:30 PM
1736
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
13925-06-9
S
T
S T
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-3-(2-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-3-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-3-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.B-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
58861-90-8
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-5-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
55138-67-5
0
1
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-6-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
36541-30-7
1
0
0
Pyrazine, methylpropyl-
XVII.B-2
29461-03-8 6303-75-9
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-5-propyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-methyl-6-propyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, pentyl-
XVII.B-2
29460-97-7
1
1
1
Pyrazine, phenyl-
XVII.B-2
18138-03-9
1
0
0
Pyrazine, propyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazine, 2-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
1124-11-4
1
1
1
Pyrazine, tetramethyl-
XVII.B-2
14667-55-1
1
1
1
Pyrazine, trimethyl-
61892-91-9
1
0
0
Pyrazinebutanol, 3-methyl-
5780-66-5
XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrazinecarboxaldehyde
0
1
0
Pyrazinecarboxaldehyde, 5-(2-furanyl)-3-methyl-
III-12, XVII.B-2
6705-31-3
1
1
1
Pyrazineethanol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61892-92-0
1
1
1
Pyrazineethanol, 3-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61892-93-1
1
1
1
Pyrazineethanol, 6-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
III-12, X-2, XVII.B-2
6705-33-5
1
0
0
Pyrazinemethanol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61892-95-3
1
1
1
Pyrazinemethanol, 5-methyl- = Pyrazinemethanol, 3-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
0
1
0
Pyrazinepentanol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyrazinol, 3-methyl-
78210-68-1
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyrazinone, 1-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
19838-07-4
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyrazinone, 3-methyl-
XVII.B-2
20721-17-9
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyrazinone, 5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
20721-18-0
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyrazinone, 6-methyl-
288-13-1
1
1
1
1H-Pyrazole
67771-72-6
XVII.B-2 H N
XVII.A-4 N
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, C2-alkyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
2820-37-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, 3,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
67-51-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, 3,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
1131-16-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, 3,5-dimethyl-1-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
66719-08-2
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, methyl-
XVII.A-4
1453-58-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, 3-methyl-
XVII.A-4
3347-62-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrazole, 3-methyl-5-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1736
11/24/08 1:57:30 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1737
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1072-91-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, 1,3,5-trimethyl-
XVII.A-4
5519-42-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrazole, 3,4,5-trimethyl-
XVII.A-4
61892-79-3
1
0
0
1H,7H-Pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole-1,7-dione, tetrahydro-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
O
O
Chapter Table
XVII.E-8
N N
33986-27-5
0
1
0
1H-Pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-amine, 3-methyl-N(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-
XII-2, XVII.E-8
33698-49-6
0
1
0
1H-Pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-amine, 3-methyl-N(3-methylbutyl)-
XII-2, XVII.E-8
34232-31-0
0
1
0
1H-Pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-amine, N-(3-methyl2-butenyl)-
XII-2, XVII.E-8
33986-28-6
0
1
0
1H-Pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-7-amine, N-(3methylbutyl)-
XII-2, XVII.E-8
64990-23-4
1
0
0
Pyrenamine
XII-2
64828-53-1
1
0
0
Pyrenamine, N-methyl-
XII-2
1606-67-3
1
0
0
1-Pyreneamine
XII-2
129-00-0
1
1
1
Pyrene
1
0
0
Pyrene, alkyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-butyl-
I.E-6
35980-18-8
{benzo[def]phenanthrene}
I.E-6
55682-90-1
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-decyl-
I.E-6
28779-32-0
1
0
0
Pyrene, dihydro-
I.E-6
30582-03-7
1
0
0
Pyrene, dimethyl- {at least three isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
64401-21-4
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1,3-dimethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, dimethyl-3,4-dimethylene-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, 3,4-dimethylene-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, 3,4-dimethylenemethyl-
I.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1,6-dinitro-
XVI-1
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1,8-dinitro-
XVI-1
1
0
0
Pyrene, ethyl-
I.E-6
56142-12-2
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-ethyl-
I.E-6
71607-74-4
1
0
0
Pyrene, ethylmethyl-
I.E-6
71607-75-5
1
0
0
Pyrene, hexamethyl-
I.E-6
72692-89-8
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-hexyl-
27577-90-8
1
0
0
Pyrene, methyl-
2381-21-7
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-methyl-
I.E-6
3442-78-2
1
0
0
Pyrene, 2-methyl-
I.E-6
25732-74-5
I.E-6 {several isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
3353-12-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, 4-methyl-
5522-43-0
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-nitro-
XVI-1
1
0
0
Pyrene, 4-nitro-
XVI-1
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-octyl-
I.E-6
71608-00-9
I.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1737
11/24/08 1:57:31 PM
1738
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
71607-76-6
1
0
0
Pyrene, pentamethyl{at least three isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
56142-09-7
1
0
0
Pyrene, propyl-
I.E-6
71630-71-2
1
0
0
Pyrene, 1-tetradecyl-
I.E-6
66161-17-9
1
0
0
Pyrene, tetrahydro-
I.E-6
60826-75-7
1
0
0
Pyrene, tetramethyl- {at least four isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
41637-88-1
1
0
0
Pyrene, trimethyl- {at least three isomers in MSS}
I.E-6
121-21-1, 4466-14-2, 25402-06-6, 121-21-9, 1171-63-0, 121-29-9, 121-20-0
0
1
0
Pyrethrins (natural)
123-33-1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
V-3, XXI-3 O O O
1
1
3,6-Pyridazinedione, 1,2-dihydro{maleic hydrazide; MH; MH-30®}
H N
O
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1, XXI-3
H N O
O
5716-15-4
0
1
0
3,6-Pyridazinedione, 1,2-dihydro-, diethanolamine salt
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
51542-52-0
0
1
0
3,6-Pyridazinedione, 1,2-dihydro-, potassium salt
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
26445-05-6
1
0
0
Pyridinamine
XII-2, XVII.B-2
71607-77-7
1
0
0
Pyridinamine, N-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
504-29-0
1
1
1
2-Pyridinamine
XII-2, XVII.B-2
1603-40-3
1
0
0
2-Pyridinamine, 3-methyl-
695-34-1
1
0
0
2-Pyridinamine, 4-methyl-
1603-41-4
1
0
0
2-Pyridinamine, 5-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
1824-81-3
1
0
0
2-Pyridinamine, 6-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
30315-34-5
1
0
0
2-Pyridinamine, 5-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-
XII-2, XVII.B-4
1202-34-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinamine, N-2-pyridinyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-6
XII-2, XVII.B-2 {2-amino-4-picoline}
XII-2, XVII.B-2
462-08-8
1
0
0
3-Pyridinamine
61771-67-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinamine, 6-methoxy-N-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
3430-10-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinamine, 2-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
3430-27-1
1
0
0
3-Pyridinamine, 4-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
18364-47-1
1
0
0
3-Pyridinamine, N-methyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
504-24-5
1
0
0
4-Pyridinamine
110-86-1
1
1
1
Pyridine
X-2, XII-2, XVII.B-2
XII-2, XVII.B-2 5 6
27175-64-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, alkyl-
1
0
0
Pyridine, C3-alkyl-
1
0
0
Pyridine, (C3-alkylphenyl)-
1
0
0
Pyridine, butenyl-
1
1
1
Pyridine, dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
4 3 N
2
XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2 {2 isomers detected}
XVII.B-2
{3 isomers}
XVII.B-2
{lutidine}
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1738
11/24/08 1:57:31 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1739
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 29011-62-9
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
Pyridine, dimethylethenyl-
0
1
0
Pyridine, dimethylethyl-
1
0
0
Pyridine, dimethyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, dimethylphenyl-
XVII.B-2
56842-43-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, diphenyl-
XVII.B-2
1337-81-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, ethenyl-
XVII.B-2
25638-00-0
XVII.B-2 {2 isomers detected}
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, ethenylmethyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, ethenyltrimethyl-
XVII.B-2
28631-77-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, ethyl-
27987-10-6
1
1
1
Pyridine, ethylmethyl-
64849-96-3
1
0
0
Pyridine, ethylphenyl-
1333-41-1
1
1
1
Pyridine, methyl-
64828-54-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, methylphenyl-
64828-55-3
XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
{picoline}
XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, phenylpropyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, phenyltrimethyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, propenyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, propyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, tetramethyl-
29611-84-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, trimethyl-
6972-40-3
1
0
0
Pyridine, 1-ethyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-
694-05-3
XVII.B-2 {4 isomers}
1
1
1
Pyridine, 1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-
XVII.B-2 {collidine}
XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
3
{¨ -piperidine}
XVII.B-2
3 2
1
6
N H
0
1
0
Pyridine, 1-methyl-6-(2-pyridinyl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(C3-alkylphenyl)- {2 isomers detected}
XVII.B-2
5058-19-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-butyl-
1929-82-4
0
1
0
Pyridine, 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl){Nitrapyrin®}
100-69-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethenyl-
XVII.B-2
22382-94-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethenyl-3-methyl-
XVII.B-2
1122-70-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethenyl-6-methyl-
XVII.B-2
XVII.B-2 Cl
N
CCl3
XVII.B-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
100-71-0
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2-ethyl-
XVII.B-2
1123-96-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- = Pyridine, 2,4dimethyl-6-ethyl-
XVII.B-2
1124-35-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethyl-4,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
2150-18-7
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethyl-4-methyl-
XVII.B-2
18113-81-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
1122-69-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-
1628-89-3
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-methoxy-
109-06-8
XVII.B-2 X-2, XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2-methyl-
{2-picoline}
XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2-methyl-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl){2-methylnicotine}
XVII.B-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1739
11/24/08 1:57:32 PM
1740
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
78210-48-7
S
T
S T
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(2-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1-methylethenyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-methyl-3-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
15032-21-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-methyl-4-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
56057-93-3
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-
XVII.B-2
20194-71-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
56057-96-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-methyl-5-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-methyl-6-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
2294-76-0
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2-pentyl-
XVII.B-2
1008-89-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-propenyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-propyl-
XVII.B-2
622-39-9 101-82-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(phenylmethyl)-
XVII.B-2
64389-08-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
XVII.B-4
7399-50-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1-ethylpropyl)-
XVII.B-2
59409-91-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1-methyl-3-butenyl)-
XVII.B-2
525-75-7
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl){D-nicotyrine}
XVII.B-4
17618-94-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
78210-51-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(1H-pyrrol-1-ylmethyl)-
XVII.B-4
21606-61-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(2-butenyl)-
XVII.B-2
6304-24-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-
583-61-9
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2,3-dimethyl-
78210-40-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2-(3-ethylphenyl)-
68258-35-5
0
1
0
Pyridine-2- C-3- C, 3-fluoro-5-(2-piperidinyl)-, (±)-, 13 14 labeled with C and C
XVII.B-6
2233-29-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2,3,4-trimethyl-
XVII.B-2
13
XVII.B-2 {2,3-lutidine}
XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
14
{2,3,4-collidine}
695-98-7
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2,3,5-trimethyl-
{2,3,5-collidine}
XVII.B-2
1462-84-6
0
1
0
Pyridine, 2,3,6-trimethyl-
{2,3,6-collidine}
XVII.B-2
{2,4-lutidine}
XVII.B-2
108-47-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2,4-dimethyl-
36238-36-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2,4-dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1122-39-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2,4,5-trimethyl-
{2,4,5-collidine}
XVII.B-2
108-75-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2,4,6-trimethyl-
{2,4,6-collidine}
XVII.B-2
589-93-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2,5-dimethyl-
{2,5-lutidine}
XVII.B-2
15827-72-2
0
1
0
Pyridine, 2,5-diphenyl-
108-48-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 2,6-dimethyl-
{2,6-lutidine}
XVII.B-2
1463-03-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2,6-dimethyl-3-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
3558-69-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 2,6-diphenyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, (C5-alkenyl)-
XVII.B-2
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1740
11/24/08 1:57:32 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1741
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
539-32-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-butyl-
XVII.B-2
6760-12-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-butyl-2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
1121-55-7
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-ethenyl-
XVII.B-2
51961-51-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-ethenyl-5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
536-78-7
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-ethyl-
XVII.B-2
23580-52-1
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-ethyl-2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
529-21-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
XVII.B-2
3999-78-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-ethyl-5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
7295-76-3
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-methoxy-
XVII.B-2
78210-42-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-methoxy-5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
108-99-6
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-methyl-
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-methyl-2-(2-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
{3-picoline}
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-methyl-2-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
72693-04-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
18368-73-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-methyl-2-nitro-
10477-94-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-methyl-5-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
1802-20-6
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-pentyl-
XVII.B-2
1008-88-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
4673-31-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-propyl-
XVII.B-2
XVI-1, XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-propenyl-
XVII.B-2
8210-50-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-
XVII.B-2
78210-38-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1,3-dimethyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
XVII.B-4
27293-93-2
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1,3-dimethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-
XVII.B-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-(5-ethyl-2-furanyl)-1H-pyrrol-2-yl]-
78210-88-5
XVII.B-4 X-2, XVII.B-4
68245-76-1
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-ethyl-2-piperidinyl)-, (S)-
XVII.B-6
5979-92-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-
XVII.B-4
78210-87-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-[2-(2-furanyl)ethyl]-2-pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
X-2, XVII.B-4
78210-85-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-(2-furanylmethyl)-2-pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
123676-95-9
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-[(hydroxy-1-oxooctyl)oxy]-2pyrrolidinyl]-
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-3-butenyl)-
72461-69-9
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-(1-methylethyl)-2-pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
XVII.B-4
15825-89-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methylethenyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
78210-86-3
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-[(5-methyl-2-furanyl)methyl]-2pyrrolidinyl]-, (S)-
8210-84-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-1H-imidazol5-yl]-
X-2, XVII.B-4 II.A-5, XVII.B-4 XVII.B-2
XVII.B-2 X-2, XVII.B-4 XVII.B-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1741
11/24/08 1:57:32 PM
1742
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
24380-92-5 19730-04-2
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-piperidinyl)-, (S){N-methylanabasine}
Chapter Table XVII.B-6
N N
CH 3
22083-74-5
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (r)-
XVII.B-4
25162-00-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (R){d-nicotine}
XVII.B-4
54-11-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S){l-nicotine}
XVII.B-4, XXI-3 N N
CH3
65-30-5
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-, sulfate (2:1) {Black Leaf 40®}
XVII.B-4, XXI-3
6505-86-8
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-, sulfate
XVII.B-4, XXI-3
2820-55-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, 1-oxide, (S){nicotine N-oxide}
XVII.B-4
2820-51-1
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, hydrochloride, (S)-
XVII.B-4, XVIII.B-3
16586-18-8
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-, labeled 14 with C,
XVII.B-4
25429-24-7
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, monohydroxy derivative, (S)-
XVII.B-4
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, 6-hydroxy
XVII.B-4
2055-29-0
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, N,1-dioxide, (S)-
XVII.B-4
491-26-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, N-oxide, (2S)-
XVII.B-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolinyl){2,3-dehydronicotine}
XVII.B-4 N N
487-19-4
CH3
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolinyl)-6-methyl-
XVII.B-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)- {nicotyrine}
XVII.B-4 N N
CH3
1133-64-8 37620-20-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-nitroso-2-piperidinyl)-, (S)-
{NAB}
XV-8, XVII.B-6
16543-55-8
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-nitroso-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-
{NNN}
XV-8, XVII.B-4
53844-45-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-nitroso-2-pyrrolidinyl-2- C)-, (S)-, 14 labeled with C
15376-62-2
14
XVII.B-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-pentyl-2-piperidinyl)-,
XVII.B-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1-pentyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-
XVII.B-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1742
11/24/08 1:57:33 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1743
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
78210-89-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[1-(5-propyl-2-furanyl)-1H-pyrrol-2-yl]-
XVII.B-4
72692-99-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-
XVII.B-4
494-98-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XVII.B-4
{nornicotyrine} N H N
78210-90-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(2-butenyl)-
XVII.B-2
78210-49-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(2-methyl-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-
XVII.B-4
6312-09-0 494-52-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(2-phenylethyl)-
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(2-piperidinyl)-, (R)-
{d-anabasine}
XVII.B-6
XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(2-piperidinyl)-, (S)-
{l-anabasine}
XVII.B-6 N H N
7300-28-9 494-97-3
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(2-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (R)-
{d-nornicotine}
XVII.B-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-
{l-nornicotine}
XVII.B-4 N H N
53844-44-3 71532-24-6
532-12-7
1
1
1
14
Pyridine, 3-(2-pyrrolidinyl-2- C)-, (S)-, labeled with 14 C
XVII.B-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(3-butenyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-5-yl){d-myosmine}
XVII.B-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3-(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-5-yl){l-myosmine}
XVII.B-4 N N
N H N
78249-81-7
0
1
0
Pyridine, 3-(3,4-dihydro-1-methyl-2H-pyrrol-5-yl){N-methylmyosmine}
XVII.B-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-5-yl)-, monomethyl derivative
XVII.B-4
78210-37-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(3,4-dihydro-3-methyl-2H-pyrrol-5-yl)-
XVII.B-4
24950-44-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3,3'-(1,2-ethenediyl)bis-
XVII.B-2
78210-39-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(3-ethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-5-yl)-
XVII.B-4
18793-19-6
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3,3'-(2,4-piperidinediyl)bis-
XVII.B-6
78210-43-2 4385-67-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3,3'-methylenebis-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3,4’-methylenebis
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(3-methylphenyl)-
XVII.B-2
525-74-6
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(4,5-dihydro-1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-
XVII.B-4
583-58-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3,4-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
{3,4-lutidine}
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(4-butenyl)-
XVII.B-2
78210-41-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(4-ethylphenyl)-
XVII.B-2
2057-39-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)-
XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1743
11/24/08 1:57:33 PM
1744
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
72692-97-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(4-methylpentyl)-
XVII.B-2
78210-44-3
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-(4-pyridinylmethyl)-
XVII.B-6
78210-45-4
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[2,5-dihydro-1-[(5-methyl-2furanyl)methyl]-1H-pyrrol-2-yl]-
XVII.B-4
591-22-0
1
1
1
Pyridine, 3,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
78210-46-5
1
0
0
Pyridine, 3-[(5-methyl-2-furanyl)methyl]-
5335-75-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-butyl-
XVII.B-2
100-43-6
1
1
1
Pyridine, 4-ethenyl-
XVII.B-2
536-75-4
1
1
1
Pyridine, 4-ethyl-
70199-60-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-(methoxymethyl)-
108-89-4 78210-47-6
Name (per CA Collective Index)
{3,5-lutidine}
Selected structures
Chapter Table
X-2, XVII.B-2
XVII.B-2 X-2, XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 4-methyl-
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-methyl-2-(2-methylbutyl)-
{4-picoline}
XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-methyl-2-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-methyl-2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.B-2
84625-54-7
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-methyl-2-pentyl-
XVII.B-2
30256-45-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-methyl-2-propyl-
XVII.B-2
75835-01-7
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-methyl-2-(2-phenylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
19352-29-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 4-methyl-3-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
939-23-1
1
1
1
Pyridine, 4-phenyl-
XVII.B-2
2116-65-6
0
1
0
Pyridine, 4-(phenylmethyl)-
XVII.B-2
78210-91-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-(1-butenyl)-
XVII.B-2
3978-81-2
1
1
1
Pyridine, 4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-
22241-38-9
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-(4-methylpentyl)-
XVII.B-2
17618-95-0
1
0
0
Pyridine, 4-(1-propenyl)-
XVII.B-2
{4-tert-butylpyridine}
XVII.B-2
140-76-1
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-ethenyl-2-methyl-
XVII.B-2
104-90-5
1
1
1
Pyridine, 5-ethyl-2-methyl-
XVII.B-2
34137-26-3
0
1
0
Pyridine, 5-fluoro-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-
55270-47-8
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-methoxy-2-methyl-
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-methyl-2-(2-methylbutyl)-
6343-58-4
XVII.B-4, XVIII.B-3 X-2, XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-methyl-2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-methyl-2-pentyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridine, 5-methyl-2-propyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridinecarbonitrile, dimethyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridinecarbonitrile, methyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
55738-21-1
1
0
0
Pyridinedicarbonitrile
17945-79-8
1
0
0
2-Pyridinebutanol
XI-2, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2
100-70-9
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarbonitrile
XI-2, XVII.B-2
20970-75-6
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 3-methyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
1620-76-4
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 4-methyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
1452-77-3
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1744
11/24/08 1:57:34 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1745
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
72693-02-8
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide, 4,6-dimethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
32743-35-4
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide, 4-ethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
13509-17-6
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide, 5-ethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
78210-61-4
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide, 6-ethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
20970-77-8
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide, 5-methyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
63668-37-1
1
0
0
2-Pyridinecarboxamide, 6-methyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
1918-02-1
0
1
0
2-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro{Picloram®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XII-2, XVII.B-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 H2N
Cl
Cl
COOH N Cl
40222-77-3
1
0
0
2-Pyridinemethanol, 5-hydroxy-
35549-47-4
1
0
0
2-Pyridinepropanenitrile
42545-63-1
1
0
0
3-Pyridineacetaldehyde
70898-37-2
0
1
0
3-Pyridinebutanal, J-(methylamino)-
64091-90-3
1
1
1
3-Pyridinebutanal, J-(methylnitrosoamino)-
64142-45-6
1
1
1
3-Pyridinebutanal, J-(methylnitrosoamino)-, (Z)-
III-12, XV-8, XVII.B-2
76014-80-7
0
1
0
3-Pyridinebutanal, J-oxo-
III-12, III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinebutanamide, N-methyl-
1
1
1
3-Pyridinebutanamine, N-methyl{dihydrometanicotine}
3000-74-6
II.A-5, XVII.B-2 XI-2, XVII.B-2 III-12, XVII.B-2 III-12, XII-2, XVII.B-2 III-12, XV-8, XVII.B-2
{NNA}
III-12, XVII.B-2 XII-2, XVII.B-2 NH-CH3
N
17270-48-3
0
1
0
3-Pyridinebutanoic acid, J-(methylamino)-, (±)-
IV.A-3, XII-2, XVII.B-2
152720-16-6
0
1
0
3-Pyridinebutanoic acid, J-(methylnitroamino)-
IV.A-3, XII-2, XVI-1, XVII.B-2
124128-84-0 133201-36-2
1
1
1
3-Pyridinebutanoic acid, J-(methylnitrosoamino){iso-NNAC}
4192-31-8
0
1
0
3-Pyridinebutanoic acid, J-oxo-
IV.A-3, XV-8, XVII.B-2
III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.B-2 CO-(CH2)2-COOH
N
15873-27-5
1
1
1
III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.B-2
3-Pyridinebutanoic acid, 1,6-dihydro-J,6-dioxo-
CO-(CH2)2-COOH
O
N H
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1745
11/24/08 1:57:34 PM
1746
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
59578-66-4
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) 3-Pyridinebutanol, G-(methylnitrosoamino)-
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, XV-8, XVII.B-2
{NNAL}
{1-butanol, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-1-(3pyridinyl)-} 133201-37-3
1
1
1
3-Pyridinebutanol, G-(methylnitrosoamino){iso-NNAL} {1-butanol, 4-(N-methylnitrosamino)-4-(3pyridinyl)-}
II.A-5, XV-8, XVII.B-2
70898-36-1
0
1
0
3-Pyridinebutanol, G-amino-
II.A-5, XII-2, XVII.B-2
100-54-9
1
1
1
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile
38076-78-7
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 2-amino-5-methyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
71607-63-1
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, dimethyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
61391-07-9
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-ethyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
3222-52-4 32214-82-7
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 6-ethyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
5444-01-9
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 4-methyl-
XI-2, XVII.B-2
42885-14-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarbonitrile, 5-methyl-
500-22-1
1
1
1
3-Pyridinecarboxaldehyde {nicotinaldehyde; 3-formylpyridine}
{nicotinonitrile}
XI-2, XVII.B-2
XI-2, XVII.B-2 CH=O
III-12, XVII.B-2
CO-NH2
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
N
98-92-0
1
1
1
3-Pyridinecarboxamide
{nicotinamide} N
72692-96-7
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, 2,4-dimethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
10131-48-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, 2,6-dimethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
58539-65-4
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, 2-methyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
78210-59-0
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, 4-ethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
78210-60-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, 6-ethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
6960-22-1
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, 6-methyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
4314-66-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, N-ethyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
114-33-0
1
1
1
3-Pyridinecarboxamide, N-methyl-
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
1453-82-3
0
1
0
4-Pyridinecarboxamide
59-67-6
1
1
1
3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid
{isonicotinamide}
XIII-1, XVII.B-2
{nicotinic acid}
IV.A-3, XVII.B-2
5006-66-6
0
1
0
3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 1,6-dihydro-6-oxo-
93-60-7
1
1
1
3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, methyl ester {methyl nicotinate}
89-00-9
0
1
0
2,3-Pyridinedicarboxylic acid
58-56-0
0
1
0
3,4-Pyridinedimethanol, 5-hydroxy-6-methyl-, hydrochloride
13121-99-8
1
0
0
4-Pyridineacetonitrile
5264-15-3
1
0
0
4-Pyridinebutanol
100-48-1
1
0
0
4-Pyridinecarbonitrile
{quinolinic acid}
III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.B-2 V-3, XVII.B-2 IV.A-3, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2, XVIII.B-3 XI-2, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2 XI-2, XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1746
11/24/08 1:57:35 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1747
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
5154-01-8
0
1
0
2,5-Pyridinediol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
626-06-2
0
1
0
2,6-Pyridinediol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
70898-25-8
1
0
0
2,6(1H,3H)-Pyridinedione, 3,5-dimethyl-
72692-95-6
1
0
0
2,6(1H,3H)-Pyridinedione, 4-methyl-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
O
1
0
0
2,6(1H,3H)-Pyridinedione, 5-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
CH3 4
72692-94-5
Chapter Table
1
N H
3 2
O
XIV-1, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinemethanamine, ethyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
3000-75-7
1
0
0
3-Pyridinemethanamine, N-ethyl-
XII-2, XVII.B-2
3-Pyridinemethanol
100-55-0
0
1
0
76014-81-8
0
1
0
3-Pyridinemethanol, D-[3(methylnitrosoamino)propyl]-
II.A-5, XV-8, XVII.B-2
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
85352-99-4
0
1
0
3-Pyridinemethanol, D-[3(methylnitrosoamino)propyl]-, 1-oxide
II.A-5, XV-8, XVII.B-2
71608-01-0
0
1
0
3-Pyridinepentanoic acid, 1,6-dihydro-G,6-dioxo-
III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1 CO-(CH2)3-COOH
O
N H
39954-19-3
0
1
0
2,3,6-Pyridinetriol {see 2(1H)-pyridinone, 3,6-dihydroxy-}
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
60655-87-0
0
1
0
Pyridinium, 1-D-L-arabinopyranosyl-3-carboxy-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
35323-45-6
0
1
0
Pyridinium, 3-carboxy-1-E-D-glucopyranosyl-, hydroxide {trigonelline}
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
535-83-1
0
1
0
Pyridinium, 3-carboxy-1-methyl-, hydroxide, inner salt
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
27341-45-3
1
0
0
Pyridinol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
1
1
Pyridinol, methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridinol, dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
51025-25-3 72762-00-6
3279-76-3
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 3,4-dimeth {2(1H)-pyridinone, 3,4-dimethyl-}
{2(1H)-pyridinone}
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 3,5-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 3,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 4,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 6-ethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 3-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 5-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
2-Pyridinol, 6-methyl-
1
1
1
2-Pyridinol, 4-phenyl-
{2(1H)-pyridinone, 6-methyl-}
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
II.A-5, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1747
11/24/08 1:57:35 PM
1748
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
0
1
0
2-Pyridinol, 5-(2,3,4,5-tetrahydropyridinyl)-
Chapter Table
Selected structures
II.A-5, XVII.B-6
N HO
0
1
0
N
2-Pyridinol-5-butanoic acid, Ȗ-oxo-
III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.B-2 CO-(CH2)2-COOH
N
HO
0
1
0
2-Pyridinol-5-pentanoic acid, į-oxo-
109-00-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol
17747-43-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, acetate (ester)
27296-76-0
III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.B-2 II.A-5, XVII.B-2 V-3, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, alkyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 2,4-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1122-43-6
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 2,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
27296-77-1
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 4,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61893-00-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 5,6-dimethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61893-02-5
1
1
1
3-Pyridinol, 2-ethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
62003-48-9 42451-07-0 61893-01-4
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 5-ethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 6-ethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 6-ethyl-2-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 6-ethyl-4-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 6-hydroxymethyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
91491-14-4
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1121-25-1
1
1
1
3-Pyridinol, 2-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1121-19-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 4-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
42732-49-0
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 5-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
1121-78-4
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 6-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
14159-68-3
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 2-propyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61893-03-6
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 4-propyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
61893-04-7
1
0
0
3-Pyridinol, 5-propyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
626-64-2
1
0
0
4-Pyridinol
II.A-5, XVII.B-2
142-08-5
1
1
1
2(1H)-Pyridinone
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
N H
O
N
O
N
OH
61892-76-0
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5-acetyl-3,4-dihydro-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
57147-25-8
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3,4-dihydro-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
61892-77-1
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3,6-dihydro-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1748
11/24/08 1:57:36 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1749
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
6052-73-9
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5,6-dihydro{2-piperidone, 3,4-dehydro-}
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
4 3
5 6
Chapter Table
2
1
N H
O
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5,6-dihydro-3,6,6-trimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
70969-38-9
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5-(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-5-yl)-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
39954-19-3
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3,6-dihydroxy{see 2,3,6-pyridinetriol}
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
72692-83-2
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
6456-92-4
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 1,3-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
36330-90-2
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3,4-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
3718-67-0
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
53428-02-7
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
16115-08-5
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 4,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
61892-99-7
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 6-ethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
5154-01-8
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5-hydroxy-
626-06-2
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 6-hydroxy-
694-85-9
1
1
1
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 1-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1 II.A-5, XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1 XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
4 3
5 6
1 N
2 O
CH3
1003-56-1
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3-methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
1003-68-5
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5-methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
3279-76-3
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 6-methyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
40316-88-9
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S){nicotone}
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1
10516-09-3
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 5-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)-, (S)-
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1
19006-81-6
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyridinone, 4-phenyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
58064-43-0
1
1
1
3-Pyridinone
III-13, XVII.B-2
108-96-3
1
0
0
4(1H)-Pyridinone
III-13, XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyridoindole
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyridoindole, butyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyridoindole, C3-alkyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyridoindole, N-methyl-
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indol-2-amine
26148-68-5
XVII.E-6 XII-2, XVII.F-8
{ADC}
N H
68006-83-7
1
0
0
N
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indol -2-amine, 3-methyl{MeADC}
NH2
XII-2, XVII.F-8 CH3
N H
N
NH2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1749
11/24/08 1:57:36 PM
1750
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
244-76-8
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole
4
Chapter Table XVII.E-6
3 2
N
N H
72693-00-6 61893-11-6
1
0
0
1
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 1-butyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
78210-53-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.E-6
78210-54-5
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-pentyl-
XVII.E-6
42438-90-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3-carboxylic acid, 2,3,4,9tetrahydro-, (S)-
IV.A-3, XVII.E-8
40678-46-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3-carboxylic acid, 2,3,4,9tetrahydro-1-methyl-, (1S-cis)-
IV.A-3, XVII.E-8
83177-17-7
0
1
0
3H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indol-7-ol; 1,2-dihydro{1,2-dihydro-1-demethylharmalol}
XVII.E-8 H N HO
62450-06-0
1
0
0
NH
5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indol-3-amine, 1,4-dimethyl{Trp-P-1}
XII-2, XVII.F-8 CH3 N NH2 N H
62450-07-1
1
0
0
5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indol-3-amine, 1-methyl{Trp-P-2}
CH3
XII-2, XVII.F-8 CH3 N NH2 N H
17276-85-6
1
0
0
9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]indole, 2-methyl-
244-63-3
1
1
1
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6 N
{norharman = E-carboline = 2-azacarbazole} N H
10371-85-4 20127-61-1
486-84-0
1
0
0
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-butyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, methyl{methylnorharman}
XVII.E-6
1
1
1
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-methyl-
{harman}
XVII.E-6 N N H
78210-55-6
1
0
0
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole, 1-(1-propenyl)-
78538-74-6
1
0
0
9H-Pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3-carboxamide, N-methyl-
CH3
XVII.E-6 XIII-1, XVII.E-8
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1750
11/24/08 1:57:37 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1751
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
50609-61-5
1
0
0
4H-Pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidine-3-acetic acid, 9-hydroxy4-oxo-, ethyl ester
3303-26-2
0
1
0
Pyrido[3,2-d]pyrimidin-4-ol, 2-methyl-
289-95-2
0
1
0
Pyrimidine
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
II.A-5, V-3, XVII.E-8 II.A-5, XVII.E-8
{1,3-diazine}
XVII.B-2
N N
5221-53-4
0
1
0
Pyrimidine, 5-butyl-2-dimethylamino-4-hydroxy-6methyl{Dimetherimol®}
II.A-5, XVII.B-2, XXI-3
(CH2)3-CH3 HO
CH3 N
N N (CH3)2
72692-81-0
1
0
0
Pyrimidine, dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
14331-54-5
1
0
0
Pyrimidine, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrimidine, 2,5-dimethyl-6-hydroxy-
XVII.B-2
1
0
0
Pyrimidine, 4,6-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
1558-17-4 88070-43-3 66-22-8
1
0
0
Pyrimidine, 5-hydroxy-4-phenyl-
1
0
0
Pyrimidine, methylethyl- {2 isomers}
0
1
0
2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione
II.A-5, XVII.B-2 XVII.B-2 {uracil}
XVII.B-2
O HN O
N H
4160-77-4
1
0
0
2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 3,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2
61893-13-8
1
0
0
2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 3-ethyldihydro-5methyl-
XVII.B-2
65-71-4
1
1
1
2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 5-methyl-
XVII.B-2
71-30-7
0
1
0
2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-amino-
{thymine} {cytosine}
XVII. B-2, XVII.C-1
H2N N
NH O
34939-17-8
1
0
0
2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4,5-dimethyl-= 2- Pyrimidinol, 4,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
3059-71-0
1
0
0
4(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 2,5-dimethyl- = 6-Pyrimidinol, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
6622-92-0
1
0
0
4(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 2,6-dimethyl- = 6-Pyrimidinol, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
34916-78-4
1
0
0
4(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 5,6-dimethyl- = 6-Pyrimidinol, 4,5-dimethyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
16858-16-5
1
0
0
4(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 6-methyl-2-propyl- = 6Pyrimidinol, 4-methyl-2-propyl-
XVII.B-2, XVII.C-1
533-37-9
1
0
0
5H-1-Pyrindine, 6,7-dihydro-
55713-43-4
0
1
0
7H-2-Pyrindin-7-one, 5,6-dihydro-3,6,6-trimethyl-
XVII.E-8 CH3
5
3
H3C O
III-13
4
6 7
1
CH3
N2
9033-44-7
0
1
0
Pyrophosphatase
XXII-2
9024-82-2
0
1
0
Pyrophosphatase, inorganic
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1751
11/24/08 1:57:37 PM
1752
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
37289-33-1
0
1
0
Pyrophosphatase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
XXII-2
9032-64-8
0
1
0
Pyrophosphatase, nucleotide
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
9038-53-3
0
1
0
Pyrophosphatase, thiamin
XXII-2
68858-66-2
0
1
0
Pyrophosphorylase
XXII-2
37277-74-0
0
1
0
Pyrophosphorylase, nicotinate mononucleotide (carboxylating)
XXII-2
106398-69-0
1
0
0
Pyrrole, butyl-
XVII.A-4
71607-59-5
1
0
0
Pyrrole, dihydromethyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
Pyrrole, hydroxymethyl-
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole
109-97-7
II.A-5, XVII.A-4 {azole}
4 5
XVII.A-4
3 2
N H
609-41-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-acetyl-
XVII.A-4
23105-58-0
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-acetyl-2,3-dihydro-
XVII.A-4
38207-11-3
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-acetyl-2-methyl-
XVII.A-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-acetyl-3-methyl-
XVII.A-4
589-33-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-butyl-
XVII.A-4
62672-96-2
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
XVII.A-4
28350-87-0
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, dihydro-
109-96-6
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 2,5-dihydro-
XVII.A-4 {3-pyrroline} 5
554-15-4
XVII.A-4
3
4 1 N H
2
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2,5-dihydro-1-methyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2,3-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
625-82-1
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
625-84-3
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 3,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2-ethenyl-
XVII.A-4
2433-66-1 617-92-5
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 1-ethyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 3-ethyl-1-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(2-furanyl)-
XVII.A-4
1438-94-4
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(2-furanylmethyl)-
XVII.A-4
27417-39-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, methyl-
XVII.A-4
96-54-8
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 1-methyl-
XVII.A-4
636-41-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2-methyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2-methyl-1-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 3-methyl-
XVII.A-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole, 3-methyl-4-ethyl-
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 3-methyl-1-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
13679-79-3
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVII.A-4
66309-87-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(2-methyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-
XVII.A-4
616-43-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1752
11/24/08 1:57:38 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1753
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
7057-97-8
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
13678-52-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-[(5-methyl-2-furanyl)methyl]-
XVII.A-4
78075-83-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2-methyl-1-(phenylmethyl)-
XVII.A-4
20884-13-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.A-4
61480-97-5
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(1-oxobutyl)-
XVII.A-4
699-22-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-pentyl-
XVII.A-4
635-90-5
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-phenyl-
XVII.A-4
50691-29-7
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-(2-phenylethyl)-
XVII.A-4
5145-64-2
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole, 1-propyl-
XVII.A-4
1551-08-2
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole, 2-propyl-
XVII.A-4
71646-51-0
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolecarbonitrile, methyl-
89145-04-0
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrolecarboxaldehyde
72692-79-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolecarboxylic acid, ethyl ester
84499-92-3
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-(ethoxymethyl)-5-formyl-
61837-43-2
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-ethyl-5-formyl-D-(2methylpropyl)-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
60026-07-5
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-D-(1methylethyl)-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
XI-2, XVII.A-4 III-12, XVII.A-4 V-3, XVII.A-4 IV.A-3, X-2, XVII.A-4
CHO
N CH
CH(CH3)2
HOOC
60026-08-6
0
1
0
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-D-(1methylpropyl)N
CHO
CH HOOC
60026-09-7
0
1
0
CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-D-(2methylpropyl)N
CHO
CH HOOC
CH2-CH=(CH3)2
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-5-hydroxymethylD-(2-methylpropyl)-
II.A-5, IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-42-1
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-D,5-dimethyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-35-2
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-D-hexyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
60026-30-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-acetic acid, 2-formyl-D-methyl-
61837-38-5
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-butanoic acid, 2-formyl-
61837-39-6
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-butanoic acid, 2-formyl-J-methyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-44-3
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-butanoic acid, 2-formyl-5-methyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-40-9
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-hexanoic acid, 2-formyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-41-0
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-octanoic acid, 2-formyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
70898-32-7
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-octanoic acid, 2-formyl-5-methyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-37-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-propanoic acid, E-ethyl-2-formyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
61837-36-3
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-1-propanoic acid, 2-formyl-E-methyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4 II.A-5, IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1753
11/24/08 1:57:38 PM
1754
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
72693-01-7 4513-94-4 26173-92-2
S
T
S T
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-acetaldehyde, D-hydroxy-
III-12, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-acetaldehyde, D-oxo-
III-13, XVII.A-4
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carbonitrile
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carbonitrile, methyl-
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carbonitrile, 5-methyl-
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XI-2, XVII.A-4 {2 isomers}
XI-2, XVII.A-4 XI-2, XVII.A-4
1003-29-8
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde
III-12, XVII.A-4
13788-32-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 1-(2-furanylmethyl)-
III-12, XVII.A-4
13678-79-0 2167-14-8
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 1-(3-methylbutyl)-
III-12, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, ethyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 1-ethyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, methyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
1192-58-1
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 1-methyl-
29813-44-3
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl)-1methyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
52115-69-2
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 5[(acetyloxy)methyl]-
III-12, XVII.A-4
1192-79-6
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 5-methyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
4551-72-8
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxamide
XIII-1, XVII.A-4
634-97-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
3220-74-4
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, 2,5-dihydro-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
3757-53-7
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, 5-methyl-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
3284-51-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, 5-methyl-, ethyl ester
V-3, XVII.A-4
1194-97-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, 5-methyl-, methyl ester
V-3, XVII.A-4
1193-62-0
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid, methyl ester
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-3-acetonitrile
XVII.A-4
II.A-5, III-12, XVII.A-4
7126-38-7
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-3-carbonitrile
17619-39-5
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-3-carboxaldehyde, 2-methyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
XVII.A-4
103002-58-0
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-3-carboxaldehyde, 4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
78210-62-5
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-3-carboxaldehyde, 5-ethyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
936-12-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-3-carboxylic acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester
487-90-1
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-3-propanoic acid, 5-(aminomethyl)-4(carboxymethyl)-
541-59-3
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione
29720-92-1
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, ethylmethyl-
XIV-2, XVII.A-4
128-53-0
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 1-ethyl-
XIV-2, XVII.A-4
{maleimide}
V-3, XVII.A-4 IV.A-3, XII-2, XVII.A-4 XIV-2, XVII.A-4
5997-61-5
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-ethyl-
61892-73-7
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-(hydroxymethyl)-
II.A-5, XIV-2, XVII.A-4
XIV-2, XVII.A-4
61892-71-5
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1methyl-
II.A-5, XIV-2, XVII.A-4
17825-86-4
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3,4-dimethyl-
61892-72-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-ethyl-4-(hydroxymethyl)-
20189-42-8
1
1
1
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
XIV-2, XVII.A-4 II.A-5, XIV-2, XVII.A-4 XIV-2, XVII.A-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1754
11/24/08 1:57:39 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1755
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1072-87-3
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-methyl-
XIV-2, XVII.A-4
60026-19-9
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-propyl-
XIV-2, XVII.A-4
3317-61-1
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole, 3,4-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-, 1-oxide
121197-26-0
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 3-butyl-5-(2methylpropyl)-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
XVII.A-4
121197-16-8
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 3-butyl-5-propyl-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
121197-27-1
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 3,5-bis(2-methylpropyl)-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
121197-23-7
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 3,5-dibutyl-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
121197-14-6
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 3,5-dipropyl-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
121197-21-5
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 5-(2-methylpropyl)-3propyl-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
121197-24-8
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 5-butyl-3-(2methylpropyl)-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
121213-26-1
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrole-2,4(3H)-dione, 5-butyl-3-propyl-
XVII.C-1, XVII.A-4
72692-82-1
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolemethanol
123-75-1
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine
II.A-5, XVII.A-4 4 5
71607-78-8 71607-79-9
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, diethyl-
XVII.A-4
3 N H
2
XVII.A-4
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, dimethyl-
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 2.5-dimethyl-, 1-nitroso-
71607-80-2
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, ethyl-
XVII.A-4
4030-18-6
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-acetyl-
XVII.A-4
5979-94-2
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-acetyl-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S){N’-acetylnornicotine}
7335-06-0
XVII.A-4 XV-8, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-ethyl-
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-ethyl-2-(3-pyridinyl){N’-ethylnornicotine}
120-94-5
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-methyl-
930-55-2
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-nitroso-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4, XXI-3 XVII.A-4 XVII.B-4, XXI-3 XVII.A-4 XV-8, XVII.A-4
{NPYR} N NO
7335-07-1
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-propyl-
XVII.A-4
91907-45-8
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-propyl-2-(3-pyridinyl){N’-propylnornicotine}
XVII.B-4, XXI-3
117642-93-0
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(10-methyl-1-oxododecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120376-92-3
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(10-methyl-1-oxoundecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
117642-94-1
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(10-methyl-1-oxoundecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120042-36-6
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(11-methyl-1-oxododecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120376-93-4
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(12-methyl-1-oxotridecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1755
11/24/08 1:57:40 PM
1756
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
69730-91-2
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxobutyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
115849-75-7
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxododecyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
74173-71-0
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxoheptyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
38854-09-0
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxohexyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxo-?-octenyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
38854-10-3
1
1
1
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxooctyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120042-35-5
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(1-oxotridecyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
61893-12-7
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(2-furanylmethyl)-
115849-82-6
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-10-methyl-1-oxododecyl)2-(3-pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
115849-79-1
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-10-methyl-1-oxoundecyl)2-(3-pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
116353-95-8
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-12-methyl-1oxotetradecyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
115849-84-8
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-12-methyl-1-oxotridecyl)2-(3-pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120042-33-3
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-14-methyl-1oxopentadecyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
115849-80-4
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-oxododecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120042-32-2
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-oxohexadecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
120042-34-4
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-oxopentadecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
115849-85-9
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-oxotetradecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
115849-83-7
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-hydroxy-1-oxotridecyl)-2-(3pyridinyl)-
II.A-5, XIII-1, XVII.B-4
60026-17-7
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-methyl-1-oxobutyl)-
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(3-pyridinemethyl)-2-cyano-
96552-73-7
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(4-methyl-1-oxohexyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
77829-17-5
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(6-hydroxy-1-oxooctyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
96574-02-6
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(6-methyl-1-oxoheptyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl), (S)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
77829-18-6
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-(7-hydroxy-1-oxooctyl)-2-(3-pyridinyl)-
XIII-1, XVII.B-4
61480-99-7
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-[(5-methyl-2-furanyl)methyl]-
69730-92-3
0
1
0
Pyrrolidine, 1-[4-(dimethylamino)-1-oxobutyl]-2-(3pyridinyl)-, (S)-
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 2-acetyloxy-methyl-
13603-04-8
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
3378-71-0
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4
1003-28-7
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 2-ethyl-
XVII.A-4
X-2, XVII.A-4
XIII-1, XVII.A-4 XVII.A-4
XVII.A-4 XII-2, XIII-1, XVII.B-4 V-3, XVII.A-4
765-38-8
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 2-methyl-
XVII.A-4
34375-89-8
1
0
0
Pyrrolidine, 3-methyl-
XVII.A-4
28882-68-0
1
0
0
Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid
32389-40-5
0
1
0
Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, oxo-, (S)-
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4 III-13, IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1756
11/24/08 1:57:40 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1757
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
29134-29-0
1
0
0
1-Pyrrolidineacetonitrile
3760-54-1
1
1
1
1-Pyrrolidinecarboxaldehyde
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XI-2, XVII.A-4 III-12, XVII.A-4
78914-62-2
1
0
0
1-Pyrrolidinecarboxaldehyde, 2-methyl-, (R)-
38840-03-8 3000-81-5
1
1
1
1-Pyrrolidinecarboxaldehyde, 2-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S){N’-formylnornicotine}
III-12, XVII.A-4
69730-90-1
0
1
0
1-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, 2-(3-pyridinyl)-, ethyl ester, (S)-
V-3, XVII.B-4
56078-08-1
1
1
1
1-Pyrrolidinecarboxylic acid, 2-(3-pyridinyl)-, methyl ester, (S)-
V-3, XVII.B-4
56879-46-0
0
1
0
2-Pyrrolidineacetic acid
III-12, XVII.B-4, XXI-3
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4
0
1
0
2-Pyrrolidineacetic acid, 1-nitroso-
61480-98-6
0
1
0
2-Pyrrolidinecarboxaldehyde
IV.A-3, XV-8, XVII.A-4 III-12, XVII.A-4
28115-37-9
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinemethanol, 5-methyl-, cis-
II.A-5, XVII.A-4
14498-44-3
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinepropanol, 1-methyl-
II.A-5, XVII.A-4
60026-15-5
0
1
0
3-Pyrrolidinecarboxaldehyde, 2-methyl-
III-12, XVII.A-4
121197-25-9
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-butyl-5-propylidene-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-20-4
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 5-butyl-3-propylidene-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-28-2
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-butylidene-5-(2methylpropyl)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-18-0
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-butylidene-5-propyl-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-17-9
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 5-(2-methylpropyl)-3-(2methylpropylidene)-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-22-6
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 5-(2-methylpropyl)-3propylidene-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-19-1
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-(2-methylpropylidene)-5propyl-
III-13, XVII.A-4
121197-15-7
1
0
0
2,4-Pyrrolidinedione, 5-propyl-3-propylidene-
123-56-8
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione
III-13, XVII.A-4
{succinimide} O
4
3
5
1 2
N H
XIV-1, XVII.A-4 O
15542-96-8
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 1,3-dimethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
33425-47-7
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3,4-dimethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
5835-19-8 58467-27-9
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, ethyl-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
15542-97-9
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethyl-1-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
77-67-8
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethyl-3-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
16824-61-6
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethyl-4-methyl-, (Z)-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethylene-4-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
14156-12-8
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethylidene-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
61892-74-8
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethylidene-1-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
16395-79-2
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-ethylidene-4-methyl-
18366-19-3
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-hydroxy- (S)
XIV-1, XVII.A-4 II.A-5, XIV-1, XVII.A-4
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1757
11/24/08 1:57:40 PM
1758
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
1121-07-9
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 1-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
5615-90-7
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-methyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
72693-03-9
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 3-(1-methylethyl)-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
15542-99-1
1
0
0
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione,1-methyl-3-(1-methylethyl)-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
71099-03-1
1
1
1
2,5-Pyrrolidinedione, 1,3,4-trimethyl-
XIV-1, XVII.A-4
25110-79-6
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinol, 1-methyl-5-(3-pyridinyl)-
28261-54-3
1
0
0
Pyrrolidinone
616-45-5
1
1
1
2-Pyrrolidinone
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XVII.B-4 XVII.A-4
{Ȗ-butyrolactam}
4 5
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
3 2
1
O
N H
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1,?-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
872-50-4
1
1
1
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
2555-05-7
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 3-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
2996-58-9
1
1
1
2-Pyrrolidinone, 4-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
108-27-0
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 5-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
75202-09-4
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl-5-(3-pyridinyl)-
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1
486-56-6
1
1
1
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl-5-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S){cotinine}
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1 N
O
CH3
N
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl-5-(3-pyridinyl)-, 1-oxide {cotinine 1-oxide}
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1
61892-90-8
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 1-(2-oxopropyl)-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
5980-06-3
1
0
0
2-Pyrrolidinone, 5-(3-pyridinyl)-, (S)-
98-79-3
0
1
0
5-Pyrrolidinone-2-carboxylic acid
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1
{norcotinine}
{5-oxoproline}
IV.A-3, XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1 O
61892-89-5
1
0
0
3-Pyrrolidinone, 1-methyl-5-(2-oxopropyl)-
18028-53-0
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrolium, 3,4-dihydro-1-methyl-, chloride
17266-64-7
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolizin-1-one, 2,3-dihydro-
COOH
N H
XVII.A-4 XVII.A-4, XVIII.B-3 III-13
O
N
13939-91-8
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazole-1,3(2H)-dione
XIV-1
O
N
N-H
O
5768-79-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[1,2-c]imidazole-1,3(2H)-dione, tetrahydro-
O
N
XIV-1
N-H
O
54036-77-0
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1758
11/24/08 1:57:41 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1759
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
62003-47-8
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,3-dihydro-5-(3-pyridinyl)-
XVII.B-4, XVII.C-1
4031-15-6
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
13950-21-5
0
1
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-1-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
78210-72-7
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-1-methyl-5-(1methylethylidene)-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
4030-23-3
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-3,4,5-trimethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
4030-22-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-3,4-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-3,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-3,5-dimethyl-4-ethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-4,5-dimethyl-3-ethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
27406-77-5
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1,5-dihydro-3-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
61892-80-6
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 1-acetyl-3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-4methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
766-36-9
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-4-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
78210-71-6
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 3-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-5-methylene-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
115600-67-4
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 4-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
4030-24-4
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 4-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-3,5-dimethyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
766-45-0
1
0
0
2H-Pyrrol-2-one, 4-ethyl-1,5-dihydro-3-methyl-
XVII.A-4, XVII.C-1
60026-28-0
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine-6-carboxaldehyde, 3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(phenylmethyl)-
III-12, VI-3, XVII.D-2
CHO CH2 N O O
35674-33-0
0
1
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,1-c][1,4]oxazine-6-carboxaldehyde, 3,4-dihydro-4-methyl-3-oxo-
III-12, VI-3, XVII.D-2
CHO CH3 N O O
274-45-3
1
0
0
Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine
XVII.E-6
N N
19179-12-5
1
0
0
Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-
XVII.C-1
19943-28-3
1
0
0
Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3methyl-, (3R-trans)-
XVII.C-1
5654-86-4
1
0
0
Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(2methylpropyl)-
XVII.C-1
26626-89-1
1
0
0
Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3propyl-, (3S-trans)-
XVII.C-1
1
0
0
Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyridine
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine
271-63-6
XVII.E-6 {7-azaindole}
XVII.E-6 N
78249-85-1
N H
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, C3-alkyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, diethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1759
11/24/08 1:57:41 PM
1760
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
72692-80-9
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, methyl{at least 4 methyl isomers other than the 1- and 2methyl- compounds}
XVII.E-6
27257-15-4
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, 1-methyl-
XVII.E-6
23612-48-8
268-91-7
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, diethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, ethyl-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, (1-methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, methyl-(1-methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, pentamethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-g]pyridine, trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrroloquinoline
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrroloquinoline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrroloquinoline, methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Pyrroloquinoline, trimethyl-
1
0
0
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]quinoline
XVII.E-6 XVII.E-6 N H
N
33-36-3
Chapter Table
1
0
0
XVII.E-6
1H-Pyrrolo[2,3-f]quinoline HN
N
XVII.E-6
232-85-9
1
0
0
3H-Pyrrolo[3,2-f]quinoline
29036-02-0
1
0
0
Quaterphenyl
253-82-7
1
0
0
Quinazoline
64811-59-2
1
0
0
Quinazoline, dihydro-
XVII.E-6
64828-47-3
1
0
0
Quinazoline, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
64828-48-4
1
0
0
Quinazoline, methyl-
XVII.E-6
700-46-9
1
0
0
Quinazoline, 4-methyl-
XVII.E-6
H N
N
I.D-1 {1,3-benzodiazine}
XVII.E-6
580-22-3
1
0
0
2-Quinolinamine
91-22-5
1
1
1
Quinoline
XII-2
1
0
0
Quinoline, C3-alkyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Quinoline, alkyl-2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Quinoline, alkyl-3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1
1
1
Quinoline, alkyl-4-methyl-
XVII.E-6
{1-azanaphthalene}
XVII.E-6
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1760
11/24/08 1:57:42 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1761
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 611-34-7
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
1
0
0
Quinoline, 5-amino-
0
1
0
Quinoline, 5-amino-6,8-dimethoxy-
Selected structures
Chapter Table XII-2 X-2, XII-2
0
1
0
Quinoline, 5-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-6-methoxy-
53452-65-6
1
0
0
Quinoline, butyl-
II.A-5, X-2, XII-2
29968-14-7
1
0
0
Quinoline, dihydro-
XVII.E-6
65312-76-7
1
0
0
Quinoline, dihydroethyl-
XVII.E-6
65312-78-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, dihydromethyl-
XVII.E-6
28351-04-4
1
0
0
Quinoline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
26190-82-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
877-43-0
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2,6-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1463-17-8
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2,8-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Quinoline, 3.6-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
2623-50-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, 5,8-dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
53123-73-2
1
0
0
Quinoline, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
1613-34-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
19020-26-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, 4-ethyl-
XVII.E-6
78249-84-0
1
0
0
Quinoline, ethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
56717-33-0
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2-ethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
27601-00-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, methyl-
XVII.E-6
65312-74-5
1
0
0
Quinoline, methyltetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
78249-82-8
1
0
0
Quinoline, methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro{several isomers present in MSS}
XVII.E-6
78249-83-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
91-63-4
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
2617-98-3
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
612-58-8
1
0
0
Quinoline, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
491-35-0
1
1
1
Quinoline, 4-methyl-
XVII.E-6
7661-55-4
1
0
0
Quinoline, 5-methyl-
XVII.E-6
91-62-3
1
0
0
Quinoline, 6-methyl-
XVII.E-6
612-60-2
1
0
0
Quinoline, 7-methyl-
XVII.E-6
611-32-5
1
0
0
Quinoline, 8-methyl-
XVII.E-6
1333-53-5
1
0
0
Quinoline, (1-methylethyl)-
XVII.E-6
64828-52-0
1
0
0
Quinoline, propyl-
XVII.E-6
29832-78-8
1
0
0
Quinoline, tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
635-46-1
1
0
0
Quinoline, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
10500-57-9
1
0
0
Quinoline, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
76602-27-2
1
0
0
Quinoline, tetramethyl-
XVII.E-6
51366-52-0
1
0
0
Quinoline, trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
4945-28-2
1
0
0
Quinoline, 2,3,8-trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
2739-16-4
0
1
0
1(2H)-Quinolinecarboxaldehyde, 3,4-dihydro-
III-12 III-12
4363-93-3
0
1
0
4-Quinolinecarboxaldehyde
64850-00-6
1
0
0
Quinolinecarbonitrile
XI-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1761
11/24/08 1:57:42 PM
1762
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
59551-02-9
1
0
0
5-Quinolinecarbonitrile
XI-2
23395-72-4
1
0
0
6-Quinolinecarbonitrile
XI-2
67360-38-7
1
0
0
7-Quinolinecarbonitrile
3778-29-8
0
1
0
2-Quinolinecarboxylic acid, 4,6-dihydroxy{6-hydroxykynurenic acid}
0
1
0
2,3-Quinolinedicarboxylic acid
1
0
0
8-Quinolinol
148-24-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
XI-2 IV.A-3, IX.A-22 IV.A-3 IX.A-22 N OH
13207-66-4
0
1
0
8-Quinolinol, 5-amino-
IX.A-22, XII-2
5541-68-4
1
0
0
8-Quinolinol, 7-methyl-
IX.A-22
91-19-0
1
0
0
Quinoxaline
64811-58-1
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, dihydro-
XVII.E-6
72692-77-4
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, dimethyl-
XVII.E-6
64828-46-2
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, ethyl-
XVII.E-6
64828-56-4
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, methyl-
XVII.E-6
7251-61-8
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, 2-methyl-
XVII.E-6
38917-65-6
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, 2-methyl- 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
13708-12-8
0
1
0
Quinoxaline, 5-methyl-
XVII.E-6
{1,4-benzodiazine}
XVII.E-6
34413-35-9
1
1
1
Quinoxaline, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
XVII.E-6
72692-78-5
1
0
0
Quinoxaline, trimethyl-
XVII.E-6
1
0
0
Radicals, free
{GENERAL DISCUSSION}
XXVII-1
13982-63-3
1
1
1
Radium, isotope of mass 226
226
10043-92-2
1
0
0
Radon
Rn 226
Ra Rn
XX-5 XX-5
14859-67-7
1
1
1
Radon, isotope of mass 222
9037-80-3
0
1
0
Reductase
XXII-2
XX-5
9028-31-3
0
1
0
Reductase, aldose
XXII-2
9023-03-4
0
1
0
Reductase, cytochrome c (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate)
XXII-2
37256-44-3
0
1
0
Reductase, ferredoxin-nitrite
XXII-2
9001-48-3
0
1
0
Reductase, glutathione
XXII-2
9028-32-4
0
1
0
Reductase, glyoxylate
XXII-2
9032-06-8
0
1
0
Reductase, hydroxylamine
XXII-2
9028-35-7
0
1
0
Reductase, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate)
XXII-2
9013-03-0
0
1
0
Reductase, nitrate
XXII-2
9029-27-0
0
1
0
Reductase, nitrate (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate))
XXII-2
9080-03-9
0
1
0
Reductase, nitrite
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1762
11/24/08 1:57:43 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1763
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9029-29-2
0
1
0
Reductase, nitrite (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate))
XXII-2
9029-17-8
0
1
0
Reductase, pyrroline-5-carboxylate
XXII-2
51848-43-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
0
1
0
Retine
0
1
0
Rhamnitol
XXII-2
0
1
0
Rhamnitol, 2,4-di-O-methyl-
0
1
0
Rhamnitol, 3,4-di-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Rhamnitol, 3-O-methyl-
II.A-5, X-2
H3C-(CHOH)4-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
Rhamnitol, 2,3,4-tri-O-methyl-
7440-15-5
1
1
1
Rhenium
Re
II.A-5, X-2
7440-16-6
1
1
1
Rhodium
Rh
83-88-5
0
1
0
Riboflavin
XX-5 XX-5 II.A-5, XVII.C-1
HO OH
HO
OH H3C
N
N
H3C
O NH
N O
146-17-8
0
1
0
Riboflavin 5'-(dihydrogen phosphate)
106777-19-9
0
1
0
D-Ribonic acid, 2-C-[(phosphonooxy)methyl]-
II.A-5, XVII.C-1 II.A-5
27442-42-8
0
1
0
D-Ribonic acid, 2-C-[(phosphonooxy)methyl]-, 5(dihydrogen phosphate)
II.A-5
0
1
0
Ribonucleic acid
XXII-2
9067-16-7
0
1
0
Ribonucleic acid (Bombyx mori fibroin-specifying messenger)
XXII-2
139872-63-2
0
1
0
Ribonucleic acid (tobacco clone .lambda.5A gene RB7 protein-specifying 1524-nucleotide messenger)
XXII-2
139872-64-3
0
1
0
Ribonucleic acid (tobacco clone .lambda.5A gene RB7 protein-specifying 1549-nucleotide messenger)
XXII-2
128285-01-8
0
1
0
Ribonucleic acid (tobacco clone .lambda.CHN17 chitinase basic isoenzyme-specifying messenger)
XXII-2
9014-25-9
0
1
0
Ribonucleic acids, transfer
XXII-2
3615-55-2
0
1
0
Ribose, 5-(dihydrogen phosphate)
50-69-1
0
1
0
D-Ribose
II.A-5, III-12 II.A-5, III-12
OH O HO-H2C
HO
OH
533-67-5
0
1
0
D-Ribose, 2-deoxy-
II.A-5, III-12
24259-59-4
0
1
0
L-Ribose
II.A-5, III-12
197-61-5
1
0
0
Rubicene
I.E-6
7440-17-7
1
1
1
Rubidium
Rb
XX-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1763
11/24/08 1:57:43 PM
1764
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
22537-38-8
0
1
0
Rubidium, ion
Rb
7440-18-8
1
1
1
Ruthenium
Ru
XX-5
Sa
XX-5
Name (per CA Collective Index)
7440-19-9
1
1
1
Samarium
129990-04-1
0
1
0
Saponin B, from tobacco
Selected structures +1
Chapter Table XX-5
7440-20-2
1
1
1
Scandium
Sc
XX-5
13967-63-0
1
1
1
Scandium, isotope of mass 46
46
XX-5
14391-97-0
0
1
0
Scandium, isotope of mass 49
49
XX-5
7782-49-2
1
1
1
Selenium
Se
XX-5
14265-71-5
1
1
1
Selenium, isotope of mass 75
75
XX-5
6898-95-9
1
1
1
Serine
HO-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
35688-48-3
0
1
0
D-Serine, N-(carboxyacetyl)-
Sc Sc Se
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
56-45-1
0
1
0
L-Serine
5147-00-2
0
1
0
L-Serine, acetate (ester)
II.A-5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
5692-15-9
0
1
0
L-Serine, labeled with C
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2
142785-07-7
0
1
0
L-Serine, L-alanyl-L-prolyl-L-isoleucyl-L-prolylglycylL-valyl-L-methionyl-L-prolyl-L-isoleucylglycyl-Lasparaginyl-L-tyrosyl-L-valyl-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XIII-1
146440-48-4
0
1
0
L-Serine, L-methionyl-L-alanyl-L-lysyl-L-alanyl-Lleucyl-L-valyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanyl-L-glutaminylL-leucyl-L-seryl-L-valyl-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-L-leucylL-seryl-L-seryl-L-phenylalanyl-L-threonyl-L-valyl-Lvalyl-L-leucyl-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XIII-1
7631-86-9
1
1
1
Silica
SiO2
XX-5
H3C-COO-CH2-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7, V-3, XII-2
14
19088-13-2
0
1
0
Silicic acid, aluminum salt
Al2(SiO3)3
XX-6
7440-21-3
1
1
1
Silicon
Si
XX-5
12141-45-6
1
0
0
Sillimanite
Al2O(SiO4)
XX-6
7440-22-4
1
1
1
Silver
Ag
XX-5
14391-76-5
1
1
1
Silver, isotope of mass 110
110
XX-5
7440-23-5
1
1
1
Sodium
Na
XX-5
7647-14-5
0
1
0
Sodium chloride
NaCl
XX-6
1310-73-2
0
1
0
Sodium hydroxide
NaOH
XX-6 XX-6
Ag
1313-59-3
0
1
0
Sodium oxide
Na2O
17341-25-2
0
1
0
Sodium, ion
Na 24
16759-28-7
0
1
0
Sodium, isotope mass 24
62574-27-0
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 2-[1-[(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)methyl]ethenyl]-6,10-dimethyl-
+1
XX-5
Na
XX-5 7
O
6
8 9
II.A-5, III-13
CH3 4
10
5 1
3 2
CH3 CH2 OGlu
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1764
11/24/08 1:57:44 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1765
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
62574-29-2
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index) Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 2-[2-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl]-6,10dimethyl-
Selected structures 7
O
II.A-5, III-13
CH3
6
8
4
9
5
10
3 2
1
CH3
CH3 GluO
62623-87-4
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 2-[2-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl]-6,10dimethyl-
54878-25-0
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 6,10-dimethyl-2-(1methylethenyl)-, [2R-[2D,5D(R*)]]-
Chapter Table
OH
II.A-5, III-13
O
III-13
CH3
CH3
CH2 H3C
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 6,10-dimethyl-3-hydroxy2-(1-methylethyl)-
18444-79-6
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 6,10-dimethyl-2-(1methylethylidene)-, (5R-cis)-
62574-25-8
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 9-(E-Dglucopyranosyloxy)-6,10-dimethyl-2-(1methylethenyl)-, [5S-[5D(S*),9D,10E]]-
II.A-5, III-13 III-13 7
O
II.A-5, III-13
CH3
6
8
4
9
5
10
GluO
3 2
1
CH3 CH2 H3C
62623-88-5
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]dec-6-en-8-one, 9-hydroxy-6,10-dimethyl2-(1-methylethenyl)-, [5S-[5D(S*),9D,10E]]-
7
O
II.A-5, III-13
CH3
6
8
4
9
5
10
HO
3 2
1
CH3 CH2 H3C
55784-90-2
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]decane-6-carboxaldehyde, 8,9-dihydroxy10-methyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-, [5S[5D(S*),6E,8E,9D,10E]]-
7
HO
HO
II.A-5, III-12
CH=O
6
8 9
4 5
10
3 2
1
CH3 CH2 H3C
35951-50-9
0
1
0
Spiro[4.5]decane-6-carboxaldehyde, 8-hydroxy-10methyl-2-(1-methylethenyl)-, [5S[5D(S*),6E,8E,10E]]-
7
HO 9
II.A-5, III-12
CH=O
6
8
4 10
5
3 2
1
CH3 CH2 H3C
162188-94-5
0
1
0
Spiro[benzofuran-6(2H),2'-[1,3]dioxolan]-2-one, 4,5,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-, (r)-
5989-24-2
0
1
0
Spiro[furan-2(3H),2'(1'H)-naphtho[2,1-b]furan]5(4H)-one, decahydro-3,3'a,6',6',9'a-pentamethyl{Į-levantenolide}
X-2 H3C
VI-3, X-2
CH3 CH3 CH3 H3C
O ....... O O
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1765
11/24/08 1:57:44 PM
1766
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
30987-48-5
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
Spiro[furan-2(5H),2'(1'H)-naphtho[2,1-b]furan]-5one, 3'a,4',5',5'a,6',7',8',9',9'a,9'b-decahydro3,3'a,6',6',9'a-pentamethyl-, [2'S(2'D,3'aD,5'aE,9'aD,9'bE)]{ȕ-levantenolide}
H3C
VI-3, X-2
CH3 CH3 O
CH3
.......
CH3
O
O
0
1
0
Spiro[furan-2(5H),2'(1'H)-naphtho[2,1-b]furan]-5one, dodecahydro-3,3'a,6',6',9'a-pentamethyl{Į2-levantanolide}
VI-3, X-2
O O CH3
O
CH3
CH3 H3C
9005-25-8
0
1
0
Starch
39341-47-4
0
1
0
Starch, labeled with C
70226-57-2
0
1
0
83-46-5
1
1
1
CH3
VIII-3 13
{starch- C}
13
VIII-3
Starch, labeled with C
14
{starch- C}
14
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3E)-
{E-sitosterol}
XXV-29 II.B-2 CH3
H3C
CH2CH3
HC-CH2CH2-CHCH=(CH3)2
H3C
HO
83-47-6
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, (3E, 24S))-
{J-sitosterol}
II.B-2
3177-92-2
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, 9,12,15-octadecatrienoate, [3E(9Z,12Z,15Z)]{ȕ-sitosteryl linolenate}
V-3
3577-13-7
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, 9,12-octadecadienoate, [3E(Z,Z)]{ȕ-sitosteryl linoleate}
V-3
3712-16-1
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, 9-octadecenoate, [3E(Z)]{ȕ-sitosteryl oleate}
V-3
41005-65-6
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, dodecanoate, (3E){ȕ-sitosteryl laurate}
V-3
2308-85-2
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, hexadecanoate, (3E){ȕ-sitosteryl palmitate}
V-3
34137-25-2
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, octadecanoate, (3E){ȕ-sitosteryl stearate}
V-3
10473-40-2
1
1
1
Stigmast-5-en-3-ol, tetradecanoate, (3E){ȕ-sitosteryl myristate}
V-3
6869-99-4
0
1
0
Stigmast-7-en-3-ol, (3E)-
II.B-2
521-03-9
0
1
0
Stigmast-7-en-3-ol, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
102491-96-3
1
1
1
Stigmasta-3,5,22-triene, (22E)-
I.C-1
81531-12-6
1
1
1
Stigmasta-3,5,22-triene, (22E,24[)-
I.C-1
86709-50-4
1
1
1
Stigmasta-3,5,24(28)-triene
I.C-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1766
11/24/08 1:57:45 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1767
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
79897-80-6
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
I.C-1
Stigmasta-3,5-diene, (24[)R
R = -CH=CH-CH(C2H5)-CH(CH3)2 83-48-7
1
1
1
II.B-2
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, (3E,22E)- {stigmasterol} CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3 H3C
HO
71607-87-9
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, 9,12,15octadecatrienoate, [3E(Z,Z,Z),22E]{stigmasteryl linolenate}
II.B-2
71278-15-4
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, 9,12-octadecadienoate, [3E(9Z,12Z),22E]{stigmasteryl linoleate}
V-3
31615-93-7
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, 9-octadecenoate, [3E(Z),22E]{stigmasteryl oleate}
V-3
20242-97-1
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, dodecanoate, (3E,22E){stigmasteryl laurate}
V-3
2308-84-1
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, hexadecanoate, (3E,22E){stigmasteryl palmitate}
V-3
23838-16-6
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, octadecanoate, (3E,22E){stigmasteryl stearate}
V-3
20242-98-2
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol, tetradecanoate, (3E,22E){stigmasteryl myristate}
V-3
18472-36-1
1
1
1
Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E)-
17605-67-3
1
0
0
Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E,24E)-
II.B-2
481-14-1
0
1
0
Stigmasta-5,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E,24Z)-
II.B-2
2364-23-0
0
1
0
Stigmasta-5,25-dien-3-ol, (3E,24S)-
II.B-2
II.B-2
7212-91-1
0
1
0
Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
23290-26-8
0
1
0
Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, (3E,5D,24Z)-
II.B-2
474-40-8
1
1
1
Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,4D,5D,24Z){D-sitosterol}
II.B-2 CH3
H3C
CH=(CH3)2
HC-CH2CH2-C=CH-CH3
H3C
HO CH3
120056-15-7
1
0
0
Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
11040-28-1
1
1
1
Stigmasta-7,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
34350-85-1
0
1
0
Stigmasta-8,14,24(28)-trien-3-ol, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1767
11/24/08 1:57:46 PM
1768
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
159169-58-1
0
1
0
Stigmasta-8,14,24(28)-trien-3-ol, 4-methyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
34347-65-4
0
1
0
Stigmasta-8,14-dien-3-ol, (3E,5D)-
II.B-2
159169-57-0
0
1
0
Stigmasta-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl-, (3E,4D,5D)-
II.B-2
57-92-1
0
1
0
Streptomycin
XXI-3
7440-24-6
1
1
1
Strontium
Sr
XX-5
14158-27-1
0
1
0
Strontium, isotope of mass 89
89
XX-5
10098-97-2
0
1
0
Strontium, isotope of mass 90
90
14808-79-8
1
1
1
Sulfate
SO4
XVIII.A-1, XX-5
18496-25-8
1
1
1
Sulfide
S
-2
XVIII.A-1, XX-5
Sr Sr
XX-5 -2
14265-45-3
1
1
1
Sulfite
-2 SO3
7704-34-9
1
1
1
Sulfur
S
7446-09-5
1
0
0
Sulfur dioxide
SO2
XVIII.A-1
2551-62-4
0
1
0
Sulfur hexafluoride
SF6
XVIII.B-3
7446-11-9
1
0
0
Sulfur trioxide
S03
XVIII.A-1
7664-93-9
0
1
0
Sulfuric acid
H2SO
XVIII.A-1, XX-6, XXI-3
7778-80-5
0
1
0
Sulfuric acid, dipotassium salt
K2SO
XVIII.A-1, XX-6
7757-82-6
0
1
0
Sulfuric acid, disodium salt
Na2SO
XVIII.A-1, XX-6
7757-83-7
0
1
0
Sulfurous acid, disodium salt
Na2SO
XVIII.A-1, XX-6
7773-03-7
0
1
0
Sulfurous acid, monopotassium salt
KHSO
XVIII.A-1, XX-6
XVIII.A-1, XX-5 XVIII.A-1, XX-5, XXI-3
11062-77-4
1
0
0
Superoxide (anion radical)
72506-68-4
0
1
0
Synthase, 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylate
XXVII-1 XXII-2
37211-77-1
0
1
0
Synthase, 5-dehydroquinate
XXII-2
9068-73-9
0
1
0
Synthase, 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate 3-phosphate
XXII-2
144324-42-5
0
1
0
Synthase, 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate 3-phosphate (petunia clone pMON9531/pMON9556 reduced) 101-L-alanine-
XXII-2
144324-43-6
0
1
0
Synthase, 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate 3-phosphate (petunia clone pMON9531/pMON9556 reduced) 101-L-alanine-192-L-threonine-
XXII-2
9027-45-6
0
1
0
Synthase, acetolactate
XXII-2
9037-14-3
0
1
0
Synthase, aminolevulinate
XXII-2
9031-59-8
0
1
0
Synthase, anthranilate
XXII-2
37290-89-4
0
1
0
Synthase, cysteine
XXII-2
9055-59-8
0
1
0
Synthase, dihydrodipicolinate
XXII-2
56803-04-4
0
1
0
Synthase, flavanone
XXII-2
9013-48-3
0
1
0
Synthase, malate
XXII-2
108281-08-9
0
1
0
Synthase, mannopine
XXII-2
131754-88-6
0
1
0
Synthase, nicotine
XXII-2
9036-37-7
0
1
0
Synthase, porphobilinogen
XXII-2
9023-35-2
0
1
0
Synthase, pseudouridylate
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1768
11/24/08 1:57:46 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1769
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9077-14-9
0
1
0
Synthase, squalene
XXII-2
9014-52-2
0
1
0
Synthase, tryptophan
XXII-2
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
9031-56-5
0
1
0
Synthetase
XXII-2
37205-63-3
0
1
0
Synthetase, adenosine triphosphate
XXII-2
9028-02-8
0
1
0
Synthetase, aminoacyl-transfer ribonucleate
XXII-2
0
1
0
Synthetase, aminolevulinate
XXII-2
37205-35-9
0
1
0
Synthetase, arginyl-transfer ribonucleate
XXII-2
37332-51-7
0
1
0
Synthetase, p-coumaroyl coenzyme A
XXII-2
0
1
0
Synthetase, dehydroquinate
XXII-2
9023-70-5
0
1
0
Synthetase, glutamine
XXII-2
147626-93-5
0
1
0
Synthetase, glutamine (tobacco clone pcGS2-17 isoenzyme 2 subunit precursor reduced)
XXII-2
9068-76-2
0
1
0
Synthetase, glutamyl-transfer ribonucleate
XXII-2
39341-90-7
0
1
0
Synthetase, indoleacetate
XXII-2
9031-15-6
0
1
0
Synthetase, leucyl-transfer ribonucleate
XXII-2
0
1
0
Synthetase, methenyl tetrahydrofolate
XXII-2
9014-36-2
0
1
0
Synthetase, succinyl coenzyme A (guanosine diphosphate-forming)
XXII-2
9023-47-6
0
1
0
Synthetase, valyl-transfer ribonucleate
XXII-2
71010-48-5
0
1
0
D-Tabacenic acid
IV.A-3
71010-46-3
0
1
0
E-Tabacenic acid
IV.A-3
71010-47-4
0
1
0
J-Tabacenic acid
IV.A-3
1401-55-4
0
1
0
Tannins
7440-25-7
1
1
1
Tantalum
Ta
XX-5
13494-80-9
1
1
1
Tellurium
Te
XX-5
7440-27-9
0
1
0
Terbium
Tb
{tannic acid}
IV.A-3
1
0
0
Tergitol ether I :
R = CH3, x=1
XX-5 X-2
1
0
0
Tergitol ether II :
d
R = CH3, x=2
X-2
0
d
Tergitol ether III : R = CH3, x=3
X-2
0
d
1 1
0 0
d
Tergitol ether IV : R = H, x=1 The Tergitol ethers possessed the structures indicated:
X-2
d
O(CH2CH2O)xCH2R CH3CHCH2CHCH2CHCH2CHCH3 CH3
CH3
92-06-8 26140-60-3
1
0
0
1,1’:3’,1”-Terphenyl
2432-11-3
1
0
0
1,1’,3’-Terphenyl-2’-ol
CH3
I.B-1
{m-terphenyl}
IX.A-22
OH
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1769
11/24/08 1:57:47 PM
1770
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
92-94-4
1
0
0
1,1’:4’,1”-Terphenyl
1148-79-4
1
1
1
2,2':6',2''-Terpyridine
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
I.B-1
XVII.B-6 N
N
494-04-2
1
1
1
Chapter Table
3,2':4',3''-Terpyridine
N
XVII.B-6
{nicotelline} N
N N
3,7
100-97-0
1
0
0
1,3,5,7-Tetraazatricyclo[3.3.1.1 ]decane {hexamethylenetetramine}
4181-95-7
1
0
0
Tetracontane
1
0
0
1,6,10,14,18,23-Tetracosahexaene, 2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl{isosqualene}
7683-64-9
1
1
1
2,6,10,14,18,22-Tetracosahexaene, 2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl-
111-02-4
1
1
1
2,6,10,14,18,22-Tetracosahexaene, 2,6,10,15,19,23-hexamethyl-, (all-E)- {squalene}
0
1
0
2,6,14,18,22-Tetracosahexaene, 2,6,10,15,19,23pentamethyl-
646-31-1
1
1
1
Tetracosane
28503-88-0
1
1
1
Tetracosane, methyl-
1560-78-7
XII-2
H3C-(CH2)38-CH3
I.A-10 I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-(CH2)22-CH3
I.A-10 I.A-10
1
0
0
Tetracosane, 2-methyl-
I.A-10
1
1
1
Tetracosane, 3-methyl-
I.A-10
557-59-5
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid
42233-59-0
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42233-49-8
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
42233-57-8
42233-58-9
{lignoceric acid}
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, ester with olean-12-en-3-ol, (3E){ȕ-amyrenyl tetracosanoate)
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COOH
IV.A-3
V-3 V-3
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
42233-54-5
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
121878-03-3
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
42233-53-4
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
42233-56-7
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
24897-95-8
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, octacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)27-CH3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1770
11/24/08 1:57:47 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1771
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 42233-55-6
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
42233-52-3
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
1001-43-0
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
42233-51-2
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
42233-60-3
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
H3C-(CH2)22-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
42233-50-1
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
36378-43-5
0
1
0
Tetracosanoic acid, 22-methyl-
121877-84-7
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, 22-methyl-, docosyl ester
V-3
121877-77-8
1
1
1
Tetracosanoic acid, 22-methyl-, eicosyl ester
V-3
0
1
0
Tetracosanoic acid, 23-methyl-
71608-05-4
1
0
0
Tetracosanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
506-51-4
1
1
1
1-Tetracosanol
63785-29-5
0
1
0
1-Tetracosanol, 22-methyl-
0
1
0
1-Tetracosanol, 23-methyl-
1
0
0
1-Tetracosene
H2C=CH-(CH2)21-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Tetracosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)21-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)20-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)20-CH3
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, 22-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)18-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, 22-methyl-, (E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, 23-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Tetracosene, 23-methyl-, (E)-
14490-79-0
1
0
0
15-Tetracosenoic acid
506-37-6
1
0
0
15-Tetracosenoic acid, (Z)-
IV.A-3
69521-46-6
0
1
0
Tetracosen-1-ol
II.A-5
58879-40-6
0
1
0
1,13-Tetradecadien-3-one
124-25-4
1
1
1
Tetradecanal
10192-32-2
V-3 IV.A-3
IV.A-3 V-3 H3C-(CH2)22-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5 II.A-5
I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)19-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
I.B-1 I.B-1
{nervonic acid}
IV.A-3
III-13 {myristaldehyde}
H3C-(CH2)12-CH=O
III-12
629-59-4
1
1
1
Tetradecane
H3C-(CH2)12-CH3
I.A-10
1560-96-9
0
1
0
Tetradecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)11-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
0
1
0
Tetradecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)10-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
0
1
0
Tetradecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl-
14905-56-7
I.A-10 I.A-10
821-38-5
1
0
0
Tetradecanedioic acid
544-63-8
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid
42232-05-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
{myristic acid}
HOOC-(CH2)12-COOH
IV.A-3
H3C-(CH2)12-COOH
IV.A-3
2040-64-4
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
22413-00-9
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
124-06-1
0
1
0
Tetradecanoic acid, ethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-C2H5
V-3
{ethyl myristate}
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1771
11/24/08 1:57:48 PM
1772
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No. 42218-21-3
S
T
S T
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
18299-78-0
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
80252-34-2
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
2599-01-1
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
124-10-7
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-CH3
V-3
110-27-0
0
1
0
Tetradecanoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-CH=(CH3)2
V-3
36617-28-4
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
3234-81-9
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
121877-45-0
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
18299-74-6
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
18653-39-9
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
3234-85-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
42232-06-4
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3
36617-27-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)12-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
V-3
1961-72-4
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-
H3C-(CH2)10-CHOH-CH2-COOH
IV.A-3
5502-94-3 5746-58-7
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COOH
IV.A-3
121877-30-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-23-4
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, eicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
121877-28-9
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-56-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, hexacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)25-CH3 V-3
121877-08-5
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, hexadecyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)15-CH3 V-3
121877-17-6
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, octadecyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)17-CH3 V-3
121877-48-3
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, pentacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)24-CH3 V-3
121877-40-5
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, tetracosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)23-CH3 V-3
121877-34-7
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, tricosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)22-CH3 V-3
2485-71-4
0
1
0
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COOH
121877-29-0
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, docosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
121877-21-2
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, eicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
IV.A-3 V-3 V-3
121877-26-7
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1772
11/24/08 1:57:49 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1773
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
121877-49-4
1
1
1
Name (per CA Collective Index) Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, hexacosyl ester
Selected structures
Chapter Table
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)25-CH3 V-3
71801-84-8
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, hexadecyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
121877-12-1
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, octadecyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3 V-3 121877-35-8
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, tetracosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
121877-32-5
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, tricosyl ester
(H 3C)2=CH-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3 V-3 71607-88-0
1
1
1
Tetradecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35nonamethyl-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34hexatriacontanonaenyl ester
V-3
62172-52-5
1
0
0
Tetradecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
V-3
112-72-1
1
1
1
1-Tetradecanol
50313-71-8
0
1
0
1-Tetradecanol, 12-methyl-
15371-32-1
0
1
0
2,6,11,13-Tetradecatetraenal, 3,7,13-trimethyl-10(1-methylethyl)-, [S- (E,E,E)]-
H3C-(CH2)12-CH2OH
II.A-5 II.A-5 III-12
H3C H3C
7
CH3
8
5
12
10 9
11
4
2
3
5
13
CH2
CH3 CH=O
CH3
125572-76-1
1
1
1
2,6,11,13-Tetradecatetraenal, 3,7,13-trimethyl-10(1-methylethyl)-
III-12
150405-77-9
0
1
0
2,6,11,13-Tetradecatetraen-1-ol, 3,7,13-trimethyl10-(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5
30790-23-9
0
1
0
Tetradecatrienoic acid
1120-36-1
1
1
1
1-Tetradecene
H2C=CH-(CH2)11-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Tetradecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)11-CH3
I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)10-CH3
1652-97-7
IV.A-3
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, (E)-
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)10-CH3
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, 12-methyl-,(Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)8-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, 12-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, 13-methyl-, (Z)-
I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)9-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tetradecene, 13-methyl-, (E)-
26444-03-1
1
1
1
Tetradecenoic acid
56219-06-8
0
1
0
9-Tetradecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)-
14167-59-0
1
1
1
Tetratriacontane
H3C-(CH2)32-CH3
I.A-10
14167-65-8
0
1
0
Tetratriacontane, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)31-CH3
I.A-10
66309-88-4 7440-28-0
I.B-1 IV.A-3 V-3
1
1
1
Tetratriacontane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)30-CH3
I.A-10
1
0
0
Tetratriacontanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)32-COOH
IV.A-3
1
1
1
Thallium
Tl
XX-5
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1773
11/24/08 1:57:50 PM
1774
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
420-12-2
0
1
0
Thiacyclopropane
533-74-4
0
1
0
1,3,5-Thiadiazine, 2-thio-3,5-dimethyl-tetrahydro{Dazomet®; Mylone®}
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
{ethylene sulfide}
XVIII.A-1
S
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S
N N
288-47-1
1
1
1
Chapter Table
Thiazole
S
3
XVIII.A-1
5
4
N
S1 2
1
0
0
Thiazole, methyl-5-propyl-
XVIII.A-1
37645-61-7
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-butyl-
XVIII.A-1
15679-09-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-ethyl-
XVIII.A-1
19961-53-6
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-ethyl-5-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
3581-87-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-(3-methylbutyl)-
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-(1-methylethyl)-
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-(1-methylpropyl)-
XVIII.A-1
18640-74-9
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVIII.A-1
32272-49-4
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2,4-diethyl-
XVIII.A-1
541-58-2
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVIII.A-1
13623-11-5
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2,4,5-trimethyl-
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2,5-diethyl-4-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
4175-66-0
1
0
0
Thiazole, 2,5-dimethyl-
XVIII.A-1
32272-48-3
1
0
0
Thiazole, 4-ethyl-2-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
52414-91-2
1
0
0
Thiazole, 4-ethyl-5-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
693-95-8
1
0
0
Thiazole, 4-methyl-
137-00-8
0
1
0
Thiazole, 4-methyl-5-(2'-hydroxyethyl)-
XVIII.A-1 H3C
CH2-CH2-OH S
N
41981-60-6
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 4-(2-methylpropyl)-
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Thiazole, 4-propyl-
XVIII.A-1
3581-91-7
1
0
0
Thiazole, 4,5-dimethyl-
XVIII.A-1
17626-73-2
1
0
0
Thiazole, 5-ethyl-
XVIII.A-1
38205-61-7
1
0
0
Thiazole, 5-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl-
XVIII.A-1
19961-52-5
1
0
0
Thiazole, 5-ethyl-2-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
31883-01-9
1
0
0
Thiazole, 5-ethyl-4-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
3581-89-3
1
0
0
Thiazole, 5-methyl-
XVIII.A-1
88381-44-6
0
1
0
4-Thiazolidinecarboxylic acid, 3-nitroso{N-nitrosothioproline}
IV.A-3, XV-9, XVIII.A-1 NO HOOC
N S
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1774
11/24/08 1:57:50 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1775
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
154-87-0
0
1
0
Thiazolium, 3-[(4-amino-2-methyl-5pyrimidinyl)methyl]-4-methyl-5-(4,6,6-trihydroxy3,5-dioxa-4,6-diphosphahex-1-yl)-, chloride, P,P'dioxide
XII-2, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3
59-43-8
0
1
0
Thiazolium, 3-[(4-amino-2-methyl-5pyrimidinyl)methyl]-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylchloride {thiamine}
II.A-5, XII-2, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
H3C
NH2
N
+
N
OH
S
Cl
N
-
CH3
67-03-8
0
1
0
Thiazolium, 3-[(4-amino-2-methyl-5pyrimidinyl)methyl]-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-4-methylchloride, monohydrochloride {thiamine hydrochloride}
II.A-5, XII-2, XVII.B-2, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3 H3C
NH2
N
+
N
OH
S
Cl
N CH3
58-85-5
0
1
0
1H-Thieno[3,4-d]imidazole-4-pentanoic acid, hexahydro-2-oxo-, [3aS-(3aD,4E,6aD)]-
36267-71-7
0
1
0
Thieno(3,4-d)pyrimidine, 5,7-dihydro-2-methyl-
-
.HCl
IV.A-3, XVII.E-8, XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1
N
S
H3C
N
302-04-5
1
0
0
Thiocyanate
463-56-9
1
0
0
Thiocyanic acid
HSCN
XVIII.A-1
XVIII.A-1
556-64-9
1
0
0
Thiocyanic acid, methyl ester
H3C-SCN
XVIII.A-1
(SCN)2
505-14-6
1
0
0
Thiocyanogen
137-26-8
0
1
0
Thioformamide, 1,1'-dithiobis(N,N-dimethyl {Thiram®}
22223-61-6
1
0
0
Thionitrous acid (HNOS), S-methyl ester
110-02-1
1
1
1
Thiophene
XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 XVIII.A-1 XVIII.A-1
3
4 5
2
S
638-00-6
1
0
0
Thiophene, 2,4-dimethyl-
XVIII.A-1
25154-40-9
1
1
1
Thiophene, methyl-
XVIII.A-1
554-14-3
1
0
0
Thiophene, 2-methyl-
126-33-0
1
0
0
Thiophene, tetrahydro-, 1,1-dioxide
XVIII.A-1 {Sulfolan®}
XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 S
O
98-03-3
1
1
1
2-Thiophenecarboxaldehyde
5834-16-2
1
1
1
2-Thiophenecarboxaldehyde, 3-methyl-
O
XVIII.A-1
CH=O
S
13679-70-4
1
1
1
XVIII.A-1
2-Thiophenecarboxaldehyde, 5-methylH3C
149956-84-3
0
1
0
XVIII.A-1
CH3
Thioredoxin h2 (tobacco)
S
CH=O
XXII-2
7440-29-1
1
1
1
Thorium
Th
XX-5
14274-82-9
1
1
1
Thorium, isotope of mass 228
228
XX-5
Th
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1775
11/24/08 1:57:51 PM
1776
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
72-19-5
1
1
1
L-Threonine
32190-57-1
0
1
0
L-Threonine, N-[2-amino-4-(3-hydroxy-2-oxo-3azetidinyl)-1-oxobutyl]-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
0
1
0
L-Threonine, N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)-
7440-30-4
1
1
1
Thulium
50-89-5
0
1
0
Thymidine
Selected structures
Chapter Table
H3C-CHOH-CH(NH2)-COOH II.A5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XII-2 II.A5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, XVII.A-1 II.A5, IV.A-3, IV.B-7, X-2 Tm
XX-5 II.A-5, X-2 O CH3
HN O
N
O HOCH2
OH
7440-31-5
1
1
1
Tin
Sn
XX-5
7440-32-6
1
1
1
Titanium
Ti
XX-5
50812-37-8 9014-48-6
0
1
0
Transaminase
XXII-2
0
1
0
Transferase, glutathione S-
XXII-2
0
1
0
Transketolase
XXII-2
0
1
0
Transmethylase
XXII-2
97-20-7
0
1
0
Trehalose
101-05-3
0
1
0
1,3,5-Triazin-2-amine, 4,6-dichloro-N-(2chlorophenyl){Anilazine®; Dyrene®}
21087-64-9
0
1
0
1,2,4-Triazin-5(4H)-one, 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3(methylthio){Metribuzin®}
II.A-5, VIII-3 XVII.B-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
XVII.B-2, XII-2, XVIII.A-1, XXI-3 (CH3)3C
N
O
N
N
S
CH3
NH2
66246-88-6
0
1
0
1,2,4-Triazole, 1-(2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)pentyl){Penconazole®}
XVII.A-4, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 Cl
Cl
N (CH2)2-CH3
55219-65-3
0
1
0
1H-1,2,4-Triazol-1-ethanol, 8-(4-chlorophenoxy)-Į(1,1-dimethylethyl}{Triadimenol®}
N N
X-2, XVII.A-4, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 Cl
CHOH-C(CH3)3 N
O
N N
122836-35-5
0
1
0
1H-1,2,4-Triazol-1-yl)phenyl)methane-sulfonamide, N-(2,4-dichloro-5-(4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro3-methyl-5-oxo{Sulfentrazone®}
XVII.A-4, XVIII.A-1, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 Cl CH3
N Cl
H3C
N
SO2
N
CHF2
O
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1776
11/24/08 1:57:52 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1777
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
27096-03-3
1
0
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
5H-Tribenzo[a,f,l]trindene, 10,15-dihydro{5H-diindeno[1,2-a:1’,2’-c]fluorine {truxene}
Chapter Table I.B-6
638-68-6
1
1
1
Triacontane
H3C-(CH2)28-CH3
I.A-10
1560-72-1
1
1
1
Triacontane, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)27-CH3
I.A-10
1
1
1
Triacontane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)26-CH3
I.A-10
1
0
0
Triacontanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)28-COOH
IV.A-3
H3C-(CH2)28-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
506-50-3 121878-07-7
104932-26-5 18435-53-5
638-67-5
1
1
1
Triacontanoic acid, docosyl ester
1
1
1
Triacontanoic acid, ester with olean-12-en-3-ol, (3E){ȕ-amyrenyl triacontanoate}
V -3
1
1
1
Triacontanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)28-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
1
1
1
1-Triacontanol
H3C-(CH2)28-CH2OH
1
0
0
1-Triacontene
H2C=CH-(CH2)27-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Triacontene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)27-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)26-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)26-CH3
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, 28-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)24-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, 28-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, 29-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Triacontene, 29-methyl-, (E)-
1
1
1
Tricosane
V-3 V-3 II.A-5
I.B-1 I.B-1
I.B-1 H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)25-CH(CH3)2
I.B-1 I.B-1
H3C-(CH2)21-CH3
I.A-10
1928-30-9
1
1
1
Tricosane, 2-methyl-
H3C-CH(CH3)-(CH2)20-CH3
I.A-10
13410-45-2
0
1
0
Tricosane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)19-CH3
I.A-10 IV.A-3
2433-96-7
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)21-COOH
42233-37-4
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, docosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)21-CH3
V-3
42233-27-2
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, dodecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)11-CH3
V-3
42233-35-2
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3
42233-36-3
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, heneicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)20-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, heptacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)26-CH3
V-3
42233-32-9
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, heptadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)16-CH3
V-3
121877-98-3
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, hexacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)25-CH3
V-3
42233-31-8
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, hexadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)15-CH3
V-3
2433-97-8
0
1
0
Tricosanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-CH3
V-3
42233-34-1
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, nonadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)18-CH3
V-3
42233-33-0
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, octadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)17-CH3
V-3
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, pentacosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)24-CH3
V-3
42233-30-7
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, pentadecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)14-CH3
V-3
42233-39-6
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, tetracosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)23-CH3
V-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1777
11/24/08 1:57:53 PM
1778
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
42233-29-4
1
1
1
42233-38-5
1
1
1
Selected structures
Chapter Table
Tricosanoic acid, tetradecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)13-CH3
V-3
Tricosanoic acid, tricosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)22-CH3
V-3 V-3
Name (per CA Collective Index)
42233-28-3
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, tridecyl ester
H3C-(CH2)21-COO-(CH2)12-CH3
36332-96-4
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, 21-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)19-COOH IV.A-3
121877-82-5
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, 21-methyl-, docosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-72-3
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, 21-methyl-, eicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
121877-73-4
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, 21-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-63-2
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, 21-methyl-, nonadecyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)19-COO-(CH2)18-CH3 V-3 (H3C)2=CH-(CH2)20-COOH
4730-63-6
1
1
1
Tricosanoic acid, 22-methyl-
71608-06-5
1
0
0
Tricosanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
3133-01-5
1
1
1
1-Tricosanol
H3C-(CH2)21-CH2OH
II.A-5
63907-54-0
0
1
0
1-Tricosanol, 22-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)20-CH2OH
II.A-5
540-09-0
1
1
1
12-Tricosanone
[H3C-(CH2)10]2=C=O
III-13
66309-85-1
1
1
1
5,9,13,17,21-Tricosapentaen-2-one, 6,10,14,18,22pentamethyl-
18835-32-0
IV.A-3 V-3
III-13
1
1
1
1-Tricosene
H3C-(CH2)20-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
1-Tricosene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)20-CH3
I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)19-CH3
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, 2-methyl-
H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)19-CH3
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, 21-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)17-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 I.B-1
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, 21-methyl-, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, 22-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Tricosene, 22-methyl-, (E)-
27519-02-4
0
1
0
9-Tricosene
30326-99-9
1
0
0
Tricosenoic acid
279-19-6
1
0
0
Tricyclo[2.2.1.02,6]heptane
I.B-1
1
0
I.B-1 I.B-1 I.B-1 IV.A-3
CH2 CH
HC
0
I.B-1
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)18-CH(CH3)2
H2C
707-35-7
I.B-1 I.B-1
CH
I.C-1 CH2 CH
1.C-1
Tricyclo[3.3.1.1]decane, 1,3,5-trimethyl(CH3)3
472-97-9
0
1
0
Tricyclo[6.3.1.02,5]dodecan-1-ol, 4,4,8-trimethyl-, [1R-(1D,2D,5E,8E)]-
II.A-5
195-84-6
1
0
0
Tricycloquinazoline
XVII.E-6
28522-57-8
1
0
0
Tricycloquinazoline, 3-methyl-
XVII.E-6
129777-24-8
0
1
0
3,7-Tridecadiene-2,12-dione, 6-hydroxy-6-methyl-9(1-methylethyl)-
II.A-5, III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1778
11/24/08 1:57:53 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1779
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
60593-18-2
0
1
0
3,8-Tridecadiene-2,12-dione, 8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-, [S-(E,E)]-
10486-19-8
0
1
0
Tridecanal
H3C-(CH2)11-CH=O
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table III-13 III-12
629-50-5
1
1
1
Tridecane
H3C-(CH2)11-CH3
I.A-10
1590-96-9
0
1
0
Tridecane, 2-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)10-CH=(CH3)2
I.A-10
0
1
0
Tridecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)9-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3
I.A-10
19780-80-4
0
1
0
Tridecane, 7-methylene-
[H3C-(CH2)5]2=C=CH2
I.B-1
505-52-2
1
0
0
Tridecanedioic acid
HOOC-(CH2)11-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3
638-53-9
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid
H3C-(CH2)11-COOH
36617-26-2
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, eicosyl ester
H3C-(CH2)11-COO-(CH2)19-CH3
V-3 V-3
1731-88-0
0
1
0
Tridecanoic acid, methyl ester
H3C-(CH2)11-COO-CH3
121877-24-5
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 11-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)9-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-57-4
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 11-methyl-, heptacosyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)9-COO-(CH2)26-CH3 V-3
121877-07-4
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 11-methyl-, heptadecyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)9-COO-(CH2)16-CH3 V-3
121877-16-5
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 11-methyl-, nonadecyl ester
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)9-COO-(CH2)18-CH3 V-3
2724-57-4
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COOH
121877-25-6
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, docosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)21-CH3 V-3
121877-19-8
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, eicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)19-CH3 V-3
IV.A-3
121877-22-3
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, heneicosyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)20-CH3 V-3
121877-14-3
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, heptadecyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)16-CH3 V-3
5129-58-8
0
1
0
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, methyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-CH3
121877-11-0
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, nonadecyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)18-CH3 V-3
121877-09-6
1
1
1
Tridecanoic acid, 12-methyl-, octadecyl ester
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-COO-(CH2)17-CH3 V-3
71608-07-6
1
0
0
Tridecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
112-70-9
1
1
1
1-Tridecanol
H3C-(CH2)11-CH2OH
0
1
0
1-Tridecanol, 12-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)10-CH2OH H3C-(CH2)10-CO-CH3
V-3
V-3 II.A-5 II.A-5
593-08-8
0
1
0
2-Tridecanone
117210-51-2
0
1
0
2-Tridecanone, 4,8,12-trimethyl-
41678-34-6
0
1
0
Tridecatrienoic acid
59573-83-0
0
1
0
5,10,12-Tridecatrien-2-one, 6,12-dimethyl-9-(1methylethyl)-, [S-(E,E)]-
7774-82-5
0
1
0
2-Tridecenal
25377-82-6
1
1
1
Tridecene
H-(CH2)n-CH=CH-(CH2)(11-n)-H
IB-1
2437-56-1
1
0
0
1-Tridecene
H3C-(CH2)10-CH=CH2
IB-1
1
0
0
1-Tridecene, 2-methyl-
H2C=C(CH3)-(CH2)10-CH3
IB-1
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)9-CH3
IB-1
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, (E)-
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, 2-methyl-
19150-20-0
III-13 III-13 IV.A-3 III-13
H3C-(CH2)9-CH=CH-CH=O
III-12
IB-1 H3C-C(CH3)=CH-(CH2)9- CH3
IB-1
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1779
11/24/08 1:57:54 PM
1780
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
60026-14-4 123-63-7
S
T
S T
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, 11-methyl-, (Z)-
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)7-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3 IB-1
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, 11-methyl-, (E)-
IB-1
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, 12-methyl-, (Z)-
1
0
0
2-Tridecene, 12-methyl-, (E)-
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
H3C-CH=CH-(CH2)8-CH(CH3)2
IB-1 IB-1
0
1
0
3-Tridecene-2,8-diol, 4,8,12-trimethyl-
II.A-5
1
0
0
Tridecenoic acid
IV.A-3
1
0
0
1,3,5-Trioxane, 2,4,6-trimethyl{paraldehyde; acetaldehyde trimer}
H3C
O 6 5
O
4
X-2
CH3
1
2 3
O
CH3
81901-03-3
0
1
0
3,5,9-Trioxa-4-phosphaheptacosadien-1-aminium, 4-hydroxy-N,N,N-trimethyl-10-oxo-7-[(1oxooctadecadienyl)oxy]-, hydroxide, inner salt, 4oxide
XII-2
70106-56-8
0
1
0
3,5,9-Trioxa-4-phosphaheptacosan-1-aminium, 4hydroxy-N,N,N-trimethyl-10-oxo-7-[(1oxooctadecatrienyl)oxy]-, hydroxide, inner salt, 4oxide, hexadehydro derivative, (R)-
XII-2
217-59-4
1
0
0
Triphenylene
60826-76-8
1
0
0
Triphenylene, dimethyl-
I.E-6
41637-89-2
1
0
0
Triphenylene, methyl-
I.E-6
60826-79-1
1
0
0
Triphenylene, trimethyl-
I.E-6
{9,10-benzophenanthrene}
I.E-6
76-87-9
0
1
0
Triphenylstannium hydroxide {Fentin hydroxide®}
3658-80-8
1
0
0
Trisulfide, dimethyl-
(C6H5)3ŁSn-OH
XX-6, XXI-3
630-05-7
1
1
1
Tritriacontane
H3C-(CH2)31-CH3
66214-27-5
1
1
1
Tritriacontane, 2-methyl-
(H3C)2=CH-(CH2)30-CH3
I.A-10
14167-69-2
1
1
1
Tritriacontane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)29-CH3
I.A-10
H3C-(CH2)31-COOH
IV.A-3
XVIII.A-1
1
0
0
Tritriacontanoic acid
9035-81-8
0
1
0
Trypsin inhibitor
150498-11-6
0
1
0
Trypsin inhibitor, TTI (tobacco isoform 1 reduced)
6912-86-3
0
1
0
Tryptophan
73-22-3
0
1
0
L-Tryptophan
I.A-10
XXII-2 XXII-2 IV.A-3, IV.B-7 IV.A-3, IV.B-7 COOH
NH2 N H
14
60738-11-6
0
1
0
L-Tryptophan, labeled with C
7440-33-7
1
1
1
Tungsten
IV.A-3, IV.B-7 W
XX-5
0
1
0
Tyrase
55520-40-6
0
1
0
Tyrosine
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
XXII-2
587-45-1
0
1
0
Tyrosine, 3-hydroxy-
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
78836_C030.indd 1780
11/24/08 1:57:55 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1781
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
60-18-4
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
IV.A-3, IV.B-7
L-Tyrosine CH 2-CH(NH 2)-COOH
HO
34393-22-1
0
1
0
L-Tyrosine, N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)-
120904-94-1
0
1
0
Ubiquitin, poly-
129970-88-3
0
1
0
5,9-Undecadienal, 6,10-dimethyl-2-methylene-
55976-13-1
0
1
0
1,4-Undecadiene, (E)-
53837-34-6
IV.A-3, IV.B-7 XXII-2 III-12 H3C-(CH2)5-CH=CH-CH2-CH=CH2
I.B-1
1
0
0
5,9-Undecadien-2-ol, 6,10-dimethyl-
II.A-5
0
1
0
5,8-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-
III-13
65017-84-7
0
1
0
5,8-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-10-hydroxy(E,E)-
II.A-5, III-13
689-67-8
0
1
0
5,9-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-
3796-70-1
1
1
1
5,9-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-, (E){geranylacetone}
3879-26-3
1
1
1
5,9-Undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-, (Z){nerylacetone}
152209-56-8
0
1
0
6,10-Undecadien-2-one, 8-hydroxy-8-methyl-5-(1methylethyl)-11-(tetrahydro-2-methyl-2-furanyl)-
51297-36-0
0
1
0
8,10-Undecadien-4-one, 2,10-dimethyl-7-(1methylethyl)-, (E)-(±)-
112-44-7
0
1
0
Undecanal
H3C-(CH2)9-CH=O H3C-(CH2)9-CH3
1120-21-4
1
1
1
Undecane
1
0
0
Undecane, dimethyl-
17301-23-4
0
1
0
Undecane, 2,6-dimethyl-
7045-71-8
1
1
1
Undecane, 2-methyl-
1002-43-3
1
1
1
1852-04-6
1
1
1
112-37-8
1
1
1
Undecanoic acid H3C-(CH2)9-COOH
71608-08-7
1
0
0
Undecanoic acid, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2hexadecenyl ester, [R-[R*,R*- (E)]]-
1731-86-8
0
1
0
Undecanoic acid, methyl ester
III-13 H(CH2-C(CH3)=CH-CH2)2-CH2-CO-CH3 III-13 III-13 II.A-5, III-13, X-2 III-13 III-12 I.A-10 I.A-10 I.A-10 (H3C)2=CH-(CH2)8-CH3
I.A-10
Undecane, 3-methyl-
H3C-CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)7-CH3
I.A-10
Undecanedioic acid
HOOC-(CH2)9-COOH
IV.A-3 IV.A-3 V-3
H3C-(CH2)9-COOCH3
V-3
112-42-5
1
1
1
1-Undecanol
H3C-(CH2)9-CH2OH
1731-81-3
0
1
0
1-Undecanol, acetate
H3C-(CH2)9-CH2-OOC-CH3
38713-13-2
0
1
0
2-Undecanol, 6,10-dimethyl-
H-[CH2-CH(CH3)-(CH2)2]2-CH2-CHOH-CH3 II.A-5
112-12-9
1
1
1
2-Undecanone
1604-34-8
1
1
1
2-Undecanone, 6,10-dimethyl{tetrahydrogeranylacetone}
0
1
0
6-Undecanone
141-10-6
1
1
1
3,5,9-Undecatrien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl{pseudoionone}
III-13
3548-78-5
0
1
0
3,5,9-Undecatrien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-, (E,E){pseudoionone}
III-13
{methyl nonyl ketone}
H3C-(CH2)8-CO-CH3
II.A-5 V-3
III-13 III-13
H3C-(CH2)4-CO-(CH2)4-CH3
III-13
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1781
11/24/08 1:57:56 PM
1782
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
13927-47-4
0
1
0
3,5,9-Undecatrien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-, (E,Z){pseudoionone}
III-13
112-45-8
0
1
0
10-Undecenal
III-12
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
821-95-4
1
0
0
1-Undecene
H3C-(CH2)8-CH=CH2
31613-73-7
0
1
0
5-Undecene, 5-methyl-
H3C-(CH2)4-CH=C(CH3)-(CH2)3-CH3 1.B-1
1.B-1
129777-22-6
0
1
0
5-Undecene-2,10-dione, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-7-(1methylethyl)-, (E)-
II.A-5, III-13
692-86-4
0
1
0
10-Undecenoic acid, ethyl ester
29093-90-1
0
1
0
5-Undecen-2-one, 10-hydroxy-6,10-dimethyl-
V-3
160115-56-0
0
1
0
6-Undecen-2-one, 10-(acetyloxy)-8,11-dihydroxy-8methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-11-(tetrahydro-5-hydroxy2-methyl-2-furanyl)-
7440-61-1
1
1
1
Uranium
U
XX-5 XIII-1
II.A-5, III-13 II.A-5, III-13, V-3, X-2
XX-5
13966-29-5
0
1
0
Uranium, isotope of mass 234
234
57-13-6
1
1
1
Urea
H2N-CO-NH2
3060-89-7
1
1
1
Urea, N’-(4-bromophenyl)-N’-methoxy-N’-methyl{Metobromuron®; Patoran®}
U
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 OCH3 Br
NH-CO-N CH3
XXI-3
19937-59-8
0
1
0
Urea, N'-(3-chloro-4-methoxyphenyl)-N,N-dimethyl{Metoxuron®}
1746-81-2
1
1
1
Urea, N’-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methyl{Linuron®, 30% of Molipan®}
35367-38-5
1
1
1
Urea, 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl){Diflubenzuron®}
XXI-3
330-55-2
1
1
1
Urea, N’-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methyl{Monolinuron®, 20% of Molipan®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
150-68-5
0
1
0
Urea, 1,1-dimethyl-3-(4-chlorophenyl)
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
330-54-1
0
1
0
Urea, 1,1-dimethyl-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
{Monuron®}
XVIII.B-3, XXI-3
Cl
{Diuron®}
CH3 Cl
NH-CO-N CH3
97-59-6
0
1
0
Urea, (2,5-dioxo-4-imidazolidinyl)-
{allantoin}
XIII-1, XVII.A-4 H2N
H N
O
HN
NH
O
O
9002-13-5
0
1
0
Urease
XXII-2
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1782
11/24/08 1:57:57 PM
The Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tabacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke
1783
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
58-96-8
0
1
0
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Chapter Table
Selected structures
Uridine
II.A-5, X-2
O HN O
N
O
HOCH2
OH OH
133-89-1
0
1
0
Uridine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), P'-D-Dglucopyranosyl ester
V-3
3616-06-6
0
1
0
Uridine 5'-(trihydrogen diphosphate), P'-D-Dxylopyranosyl ester
V-3
19253-25-9
0
1
0
Uridine 5'-(trihydrogen pyrophosphate), mono(6deoxymannopyranosyl) ester
V-3
58-97-9
0
1
0
5'-Uridylic acid
O
H N
O HO
P
O
O
O
IV.A-3, V-3
N
OH HO
9026-22-6
0
1
0
Uridylyltransferase, glucose 1-phosphate
94414-19-4
0
1
0
Urs-12-en-28-oic acid, 3,23-dihydroxy-, (3E,4D)-
77-52-1
0
1
0
Urs-12-en-28-oic acid, 3-hydroxy-, (3E)-
638-95-9
1
1
1
Urs-12-en-3-ol, (3E)-
OH
XXII-2 II.A-5, IV.A-3 II.A-5, IV.A-3 {D-amyrin}
II.A-5
CH3 H3C
CH3
H3C
CH3 CH3
HO H3C
7004-03-7
1
1
1
Valine
72-18-4
0
1
0
L-Valine
0
1
0
L-Valine, N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)-
0
1
0
Valine, N-(2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-, cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl ester {Fluvalinate®}
102851-06-9
CH3
(H3C)2=CH-CH(NH2)-COOH IV.A-3, IV.B-7 IV.A-3, IV.B-7 X-2 Cl
O H N
F3C
H3C
CN O
O
CH3
V-3, X-2, XI-2, XVIII.B-3, XXI-3 7440-62-2
1
1
1
Vanadium
V
XX-5
1314-62-1
0
1
0
Vanadium pentoxide
V2O5
XX-6
12001-76-2
0
1
0
Vitamin B
7732-18-5
1
1
1
Water
H2O
XIX-5
92-83-1
1
0
0
9H-Xanthene
II.A-5 {dibenzopyran}
9
X-2
O
6279-07-8
1
0
0
9H-Xanthene, 2-methyl-
90-47-1
0
1
0
9H-Xanthen-9-one
X-2 {xanthone}
O
III-13
O
9014-63-5
0
1
0
Xylan
II.A-5, VIII-3
0
1
0
Xylan, 4’-O-methylglucuronyloxy)-
II.A-5, VIII-3
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1783
11/24/08 1:57:58 PM
1784
The Chemical Components of Tobacco and Tobacco Smoke
Alphabetical Index to Chemical Components in Tobacco, Tobacco Smoke, and Tobacco Substitute Smoke CAS No.
S
T
S T
9025-57-4
0
1
0
Xylanase, endo-1,4-E-
87-99-0
0
1
0
Xylitol
Name (per CA Collective Index)
Selected structures
Chapter Table XXII-2
HO-H 2C
OH
OH
II.A-5
HO
82796-87-0
1
0
0
D-Xylonic acid, G-lactone
25990-60-7
1
1
1
Xylose
II.A-5, VI-3 I.A-5, X-2
O OH OH
HO
OH
31178-70-8
0
1
0
D-D-Xylose
II.A-5, X-2
31178-71-9
0
1
0
E-d-Xylose
II.A-5, X-2
0
1
0
E-Xylosidase
7440-64-4
1
1
1
Ytterbium
Yb
7440-65-5
1
1
1
Yttrium
Y
XXII-2 XX-5 XX-5
10098-91-6
0
1
0
Yttrium, isotope of mass 90
90
Y
XX-5
7440-66-6
1
1
1
Zinc
Zn
XX-5
12122-67-7
0
1
0
Zinc, [[1,2-ethanediylbis[carbamodithioato]](2-)]{Zineb®}
XVIII.A-1, XX-5, XXI-3 Zn2+ S-
S-
S
S HN
18920-65-5
0
1
0
Zinc, bis(thiocarbamato)-
23713-49-7
0
1
0
Zinc, ion
Zn
13982-39-3 7440-67-7 Totals
XVIII.A-1, XX-6
+2
XX-5
Zn
XX-5 XX-5
1
1
Zinc, isotope of mass 65
65
1
1
1
Zirconium
Zr
5 3 1 5
4 9 9 4
1 8 7 9
1
NH
There were 292 partially identified isomers listed in the preceding index. Thus, the number of identified/partially identified components in tobacco and tobacco smoke totals 8622 (8430 + 292 - 100).
© 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 78836_C030.indd 1784
11/24/08 1:57:58 PM