Arch. Math. 74 (2000) 423 ± 431 0003-889X/00/060423-09 $ 3.30/0 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2000
Archiv der Mathematik
...
27 downloads
405 Views
93KB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Arch. Math. 74 (2000) 423 ± 431 0003-889X/00/060423-09 $ 3.30/0 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2000
Archiv der Mathematik
A bound for the least Gaussian prime w with a < arg
w < b By HAJIME MATSUI
Abstract. We give an explicit function B
q such that there is a Gaussian prime w with ww < B
b ÿ a and a < arg
w < b.
1. Introduction. In the present paper, we consider the following problem; for given
a; b with a < b % a p2 , estimate the minimum of norms of Gaussian primes whose arguments are within
a; b. (An element w 2 Zi is called a Gaussian prime if
w wZi is a prime ideal of Zi.) We can give an answer for the problem under ªGRH.º Theorem 1. Assume the truth of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for 1 P yr
a L
s; yr with yr
a exp
4 ir arg
a and r 2 Z, where a runs over non4 a jaj2s zero elements in Zi. Then for any real numbers a; b; with a < b % a p2 , there exists a Gaussian prime w with a < arg
w < b such that ww <
A1
b ÿ a2
log 4
1 ; bÿa
where A1 is a positive absolute constant. The proof of Theorem 1 employs classical analytic methods for the Hecke L-functions with Grössencharacters, using a special integral kernel in [2]. Moreover, we make use of certain trigonometric polynomials in [4], [5], which are majorants or minorants of the characteristic function of interval
a; b on the unit circle. Next, we consider whether one can say something without GRH. Theorem 2. For any real numbers a; b; with a < b % a p2 , there exists a Gaussian prime w with a < arg
w < b such that ! 3 A2 1 2 ww < exp p log ; bÿa bÿa where A2 is a positive absolute constant. Mathematics Subject Classification (1991): 11R44.
424
H. MATSUI
ARCH. MATH.
As a matter of fact, we can get similar results for any imaginary quadratic field (Theorem 3, 4, in the text). 2. Hecke L-functions and a special integral kernel. First we summarize Heckes results which are used in this paper. From now on, weargue pabout not only the Gaussian field but also imaginary quadratic number fields. Let Q ÿd be an imaginary quadratic field, and ÿd its discriminant. Let c be a Grössencharacter of conductor
1 such that u p a for all a 2 Q ÿd c
a jaj with an integer u. If u 0, then c is a character of the ideal class group. We define for a complex number with Re
s > 1 L
s; c
X c
I I
NI s
Q P
1 ÿ c
PNPÿs ÿ1 ;
where I runs over all integral ideals, P runs over all prime ideals and NI is the norm of I. We set n odc p juj d s G s L
s; c; L
s; c s
1 ÿ s 2 2p where dc 1 if c 1, and 0 otherwise. Hecke showed that L
s; c is analytically continued to an entire function on the whole s-plane, and satisfies the functional equation L
s; c iÿjuj W
cL
1 ÿ s; cÿ1 ; where W
c is the Gaussian sum of c, and jW
cj 1. Our first aim is to compute the following integral in two ways. We set
1 L0 ÿ
s; ck
s; x; yds Ic L 2pi
2
2iT
with y > x > 1, where
lim
2
T! 1
k
s; x; y k
s
and 2ÿiT sÿ1
y
ÿ xsÿ1 sÿ1
2
;
which is one of the integral kernels used in [2]. The inverse Mellin transform of k
s is given for v > 0 by 8 0 if v % x2 ; > > > > 1 v > > > log 2 if x2 % v % xy; >
2pi >1 y2 > >
2 if xy % v % y2 ; log > > > v v > : 0 if y2 % v:
Vol. 74, 2000
425
A bound for the least Gaussian prime
One method to compute Ic is based on the logarithmic derivative formula of L-function: ÿ
1 PP L0
s; c c
Pn log NP NPÿns : L P n1
Thus we have Ic
1 PP P n1
n b c
Pn log NP k
NP ; x; y;
b Here the sum over those ideals Pn for and this is a finite sum by the above property of k. n which NP is not a rational prime is evaluated in [2]; for y > x ^ 2, P y n b c
Pn log NP k
NP ; x; y log y log
x log xÿ1 : x NPn : not prime Hence we have
1
Ic
y b c
P log NP k
NP; x; y O log y log
x log xÿ1 : x NP: prime P
Next, using Cauchys theorem, we can show P
2 Ic dc k
1; x; y ÿk
; x; y;
where runs over all zeros of L
s; c. The case in which c is a character of the ideal class group is shown in [2], and our case is proved by the similar methods. To estimate the righthand side of (2), we first compute the sum over trivial zeros, that is, the zeros where Re
s b < 0. Since L
s; c is an entire function, L
s; c has simple zeros at the following points: juj ÿ n; n 0; 1; 2; . . . 2 ÿ1; ÿ2; ÿ3; . . . ÿ
if
u j 0;
if
u 0:
Hence we obtain X X 4x2bÿ2 k
; x; y % xÿ4 : 2 b<0 b<0
b ÿ 1 We next compute the rest, which is the sum over non-trivial zeros, that is, the zeros where 0 % Re
s % 1. We need the following lemma, which is proved by the similar method as [3]. Lemma 1. For any T 2 R, we have X X 1 1; log
d
jTj juj 1;
g ÿ T2 jgÿTj % 1 jgÿTj>1 where b ig runs over zeros of L
s; c with 0 % b % 1; g 2 R, subject to each condition. I . Th e c a s e w h e r e w e a s s u m e G R H . The hypothesis asserts that any non-trivial zero b ig of L
s; c satisfies b 12, and thereby X X X X 1 1 k
; x; y % 4xÿ1 xÿ1 1 xÿ1 : 2 g2 1 j ÿ 1j 0%b%1
b2
jgj % 1
jgj>1
426
H. MATSUI
ARCH. MATH.
Hence by Lemma 1 we obtain P k
; x; y xÿ1 log
d
juj 1: 0%b%1
I I . Th e c a s e w h e r e w e d o n o t a s s u m e G R H . Lemma 2. There exists an absolute constant c > 0 with the following property. In the region defined by c Re
s ^ 1 ÿ ; jIm
sj % 1; log
d
juj 1 L
s; c has no zeros with the possible exception of a real simple zero when c 1. P r o o f. If u j 0, the proof is similar to [2]. Suppose that u 0. The case that c2 j 1 or c 1 is proved in [2]. Thus we can assume c2 1 and c j 1. In [2], it is shown that L
s; c has no zeros on the above region with the exception of at most one real simple zero. Under the more general condition c j 1, it is a well-known fact that L
s; c is essentially the L-function of a holomorphic cusp form with respect to G 0
d, and the nonexistence of the zeros outside the region is proved in [1]. This completes the proof. We denote the zero out of the region of Lemma 3 by b0 if it exists; then we have X X 4x2bÿ2 X 1 X X 1 k
; x; y % %4 4 34 : 2 2 jb g j ÿ 1j j ÿ 1j2 j b0 j b0 jgj>1 jgj % 1 0 0%b%1 0%b%1 jÿ1j % p1 jÿ1j>p1 3 3 Because of Lemma 1, the first and second terms are O log
d
juj 1 . To estimate the third term we need a lemma, which can be shown with the same method as Lemma 2.2 of [2]. Lemma 3. Let nc
l; s denote the number of zeros of L
s; c with js ÿ j % l. Then for 1 Re
s ^ 1 and 0 < l % p 3 nc
l; s 1 l log
d
jtj juj 1: 1 j b0, it follows from Lemma 2 that j ÿ 1j ^ 1 ÿ b If satisfies j ÿ 1j % p ; 3 c c > . Let s denote ; then by Lemma 3 we obtain log
d
juj 1 log
d
juj 1 p1
3 X 1 1 dnc
l; 1 2 2 l j ÿ 1j j b0 s jÿ1j % p1 p1 3 p1
3 nc
l; 1 3 nc
l; 1 2 dl l2 l3 s s
log 2
d
juj 1: Thus we obtain a final estimate without GRH: P k
; x; y log2
d
juj 1: j b0 0%b%1
Vol. 74, 2000
427
A bound for the least Gaussian prime
Summarizing the previous results, we have 8 > < O xÿ1 log
d
juj 1 Ic dc k
1 O
xÿ4 > : O log 2
d
juj 1 ÿ dc k
b0
case
I;
case
II:
Since it follows from the Taylor series expansion for k
s about s 1 that y k
1; x; y log2 , we finally conclude from (1) and the above that for y > x ^ 2 x b ÿ1 P y 0 ÿ xb0 ÿ1 2 2 y b c
P log NP k
NP; x; y ÿ dc log dc b0 ÿ 1 x NP: prime (
3 xÿ1 log
d
juj 1 case I; y log y log
x log xÿ1 x case II: log2
d
juj 1 3. Extremal trigonometric polynomials. In this section, we make use of specific extremal trigonometric polynomials, namely Sÿ K
x below. (Here we say that S
t is a trigonometric K P polynomial of degree K if S
t is in the form of ar sin 2prt br cos 2prt, where ar ; br are r0
real numbers.) Notations are those in [4]. Let t
t denote the saw-tooth function ( t ÿ t ÿ 12 t 2j Z; t
t 0 t 2 Z; where t denotes the largest integer not exceeding a real number t, and K 1 X r pr 1 1ÿ BK
t ÿ cot sin 2prt K 1 r1 K1 K1 p 1 sin p
K 1t 2 ; sin pt 2
K 12 where K denotes a positive integer. Vaaler showed in [5] that BK
t ^ t
t for all t and that if T
t is a trigonometric polynomial of degree % K such that T
t ^ t
t for all t, then 1 1 T
tdt ^ with equality if and only if T
t BK
t. 2
K 1 0 Let C
a;b
t denote the characteristic function of open interval
a; b with a < b % a 1 in R=Z. This satisfies C
a;b
t b ÿ a t
t ÿ b t
a ÿ t b ÿ a ÿ t
b ÿ t ÿ t
t ÿ a except when t coincides with a or b; in fact the both right-hand sides equal 1=2 at t a; b. We put S K
t b ÿ a BK
t ÿ b BK
a ÿ t; Sÿ K
t b ÿ a ÿ BK
b ÿ t ÿ BK
t ÿ a: It is clear that S K
t is a trigonometric polynomial of degree at most K, that 1 1 Sÿ SK
tdt b ÿ a . Defining the r-th K
t % C
a;b
t % SK
t for all t, and that K 1 0
428
H. MATSUI
ARCH. MATH.
1 f ÿ2pirt Fourier coefficients of S dt, one can prove from the above K
t by SK
r SK
te 0 properties that 1
0 b ÿ a Sf ; K K1 1 1 f
r % min b ÿ a; with S K K1 pjrj
4
r j 0:
Let l; m be real numbers with l < m % l 2p, namely 0 < m ÿ l % 2p, and let
w denote a principal prime ideal; then C
a;b ^ Sÿ K implies X b log N
w k
N
w; x; y l<arg c
w<m
arg c
w b log N
w k
N
w 2p N
w: prime K X P ÿ
r eir arg c
w log N
w k
N
w b Sf K X
^
Sÿ K
rÿK
N
w: prime
K X rÿK
Since
S K
x
ÿ
r Sf K
n
P N
w: prime
o b cr
w log N
w k
N
w :
ÿ
ÿr S ÿ
r. Thus we have f is real valued, we have Sf K K X b log N
w k
N
w; x; y l<arg c
w<m ÿ
0 ^ Sf K
5
ÿ2
X
b log N
w k
N
w
N
w: prime
K X r1
ÿ
rj jSf K
P N
w: prime
b : cr
w log N
w k
N
w
This inequality with (4) is a variation of the Erdös-TuÂran inequality ([4], [5]). An upper bound of the left-hand side can be similarly obtained by using S K , but it is no use for our purpose. 4. Proofs of theorems. p Theorem 3. Let F be an imaginary quadratic field Q ÿd with discriminant ÿd, and let w; h be the number of roots of unity in F and the class number. Assume the truth of the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for L
s; j yr where j
j 1; 2; . . . ; h are all characters of the ideal class group of F, y
a exp
iw arg
a for all a 2 F , and r 2 Z. Then for any 2p real numbers a; b; with a < b % a , there exists a prime element w in F with w a < arg
w < b such that N
w <
C3 log 2 d 2
b ÿ a
log4
1 ;
b ÿ a
where C3 is a positive absolute constant. P r o o f. From now on, c1 ; c2 ; . . . denote absolute positive constants. Since we have u wr for yr and w % 6 for all imaginary quadratic fields, it follows from (3) that for y > x ^ 2
Vol. 74, 2000
A bound for the least Gaussian prime
429
y b j yr
P log NP k
NP; x; y ÿ dj yr log 2 x NP: prime o n y % c1 log y log
x log xÿ1 xÿ1 log
d
jrj 1 : x X
Using this formula and the orthogonality relation of j, we have X y b yr
w log N
w k
N
w; x; y ÿ hÿ1 dyr log 2 x N
w: prime o n y % c1 log y log
x log xÿ1 xÿ1 log
d
jrj 1 : x 3 ÿ Since we have ÿK % r % K, we obtain the inequality Sf
r with r j 0 by (4). It is % K 2jrj trivial that wa < arg y
w < wb holds if and only if a < arg
w < b. Now applying (5) for l wa and m wb, we obtain X b log N
w k
N
w; x; y a<arg
w
n o w 1 y y
b ÿ a ÿ log 2 ÿ c2 log y log
x log xÿ1 xÿ1 log d 2p h
K 1 x x K n o X 1 y ÿ3 c1 log y log
x log xÿ1 xÿ1 log
d
r 1 r x r1 w 1 y ^
b ÿ a ÿ log 2 2p h
K 1 x n o y ÿ1 ÿ c3 log y log
x log x xÿ1 log
d
K 1 log
K 1: x ^
We set y ex; then the right-hand side becomes ^
w 1
b ÿ a ÿ ÿ c4 xÿ1 log
d
K 1 log
K 1: 2p h
K 1
We set x x0 log d with x0 ^ 1; then the right-hand side becomes ^
w 1
b ÿ a ÿ ÿ c5 x0ÿ1 log 2
K 1: 2p h
K 1
1 < 1=x0. Moreover it follows from the assumption h
K 1 x0 ^ 1 that log2
K 1 % log 2
2x0 . Hence we have X b log N
w k
N
w; x0 log d; ex0 log d We set K x0 ; then we have
a<arg
w
^
w w
b ÿ a ÿ x0ÿ1 ÿ c5 x0ÿ1 log2 2x0 ^
b ÿ a ÿ c6 x0ÿ1 log2 2x0 : 2p 2p
C 1 log 2 and C sufficiently large. If we put q b ÿ a, then we can bÿa
b ÿ a make the following satisfying for all q;
We set x0
430
H. MATSUI
ARCH. MATH.
1 1 2 c6 q log 2C log 2 log log q q > 0: qÿ 1 Clog2 q Thus we can conclude that there exists a prime element w with a < arg
w < b such that e2 C2 log 2 d 1 log 4 . This implies Theorem 3. N
w < 2
b ÿ a
b ÿ a Theorem 4. Let F, w and h be as Theorem 3. Then for any real numbers a; b; with 2p a < b % a , there exists a prime element w in F with a < arg
w < b such that w ! 3 A4 1 N
w < exp p log 2 ; bÿa bÿa where A4 is a positive constant depending only on F. P r o o f. From now on, a1 ; a2 ; . . . denote positive constants depending only on F. We put y y x2 ; then we have log y log
x log xÿ1 1. Thus it follows from (3) that x P r b y
w log N
w k
N
w ÿ hÿ1 dyr log 2 x % a1 log 2
jrj e: N
w: prime Similarly as the proof of Theorem 3, we obtain P b log N
w k
N
w; x; x2 a<arg
w
^
w 1
b ÿ a ÿ log 2 x ÿ a2 log 3
K 1: 2p h
K 1
p 1 We set x exp f
K 1log3
K 1g; then we obtain log2 x % log3
K 1. Hence h
K 1 we have n o P w b log N
w k
N
w; x; x2 ^ log3
K 1
b ÿ a
K 1 ÿ a3 : 2p a<arg
w
Vol. 74, 2000
A bound for the least Gaussian prime
431
[4] H. MONTGOMERY, Ten lectures on the interface between analytic number theory and harmonic analysis. CBMS Regional Conf. Ser. in Math. 84, Amer. Math. Soc. 1994. [5] J. D. VAALER, Some extremal functions in Fourier analysis. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 12, 183 ± 216 (1985). Eingegangen am 11. 1. 1999 Anschrift des Autors: Hajime Matsui Graduate School of Mathematics Nagoya University Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan