Chess Opening Essentials VolUIlle 1 ~ The Complete 1.e4
Stefan Djuric - Dimitri Komarov - Claudio Paritaleoni
Chess ...
1488 downloads
24315 Views
183MB Size
Report
This content was uploaded by our users and we assume good faith they have the permission to share this book. If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. Start by pressing the button below!
Report copyright / DMCA form
Chess Opening Essentials VolUIlle 1 ~ The Complete 1.e4
Stefan Djuric - Dimitri Komarov - Claudio Paritaleoni
Chess Opening Essentials Volume 1 - The Complete 1.e4
New In Chess 2007
2007 New In Chess © Messaggerie Scacchistiche 2004 Revised and updated Engish edition published by New In Chess. Alkmaar. The Netherlands www.newinchess.com This edition is published by arrangement with Le due Torri - Chess Department Store - Italy - www.chess.it All rights reserved . No part of this book may be reproduced. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means. electronic. mechanical. photocopying. recording or otherwise. without the prior written permission from the publisher. Editor: Pierluigi Passerotti Cover design: Steven Boland Supervisor: Peter Boel Translator: Richard Jones Proofreading: Rene Olthof Production: Anton Schermer
ISBN-I 0: 90-5691-203-8 ISBN-J3: 978-90-5691-203-1
Throughont our entire lives we all need a game thot lets us play like children; something we can take seriously and to which we apply ourselves in earnest, knowing all along that it is of no real importance ot all. G. Rensi Letters on the spiritual
This opening book is chiefly intended for the average player. Yet at the same time, it should prove to be of use to both beginners and master-strength players. I know that I have certainly learnt a great deal while editing this book. Above all it has given me the opportunity to apply, re-examine, and deepen my knowledge of chess within the context of what we can learn from the historical development of chess theory. The book underlines the importance of understanding the subtle thread that runs through and unites the various phases of the game. I believe that opening books of this quality are rare indeed. I hope that by using this book readers will enjoy improved practical results, as well as the satisfaction that comes from having a deeper understanding of our 'royal game'. To finish with, a quick look at some of the book's features. Coloured text highlights moves which are of great importance; the names of the main variations, key initial positions and positions arising after important sequences which are all useful for evaluating the opening variation in question. Bold type, be it in black or in colour, indicates main lines, which are also classified and sub-classified (AI, B22, etc.). Lines in italics are unsound lines or errors to be avoided. But this is not all. Two-colour printing makes consulting the book quicker, and there are numerous graphic features more often associated with sophisticated chess computer software than with chess books. In short, no effort has been spared to create a truly exceptional book.
Pier/nigi Passerotti Editor
5
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Glossary of chess symbols brilliant move interesting move dubious move mistake blunder novelty initiative
!! !? ?! ?? N
t
6
+- White has a decisive advantage ± White has a clear advantage ;;!;
=F
-+ #
White has a slight advantage equal Black has a slight advantage Black has a decisive advantage checkmate
Contents Preface· ......... .... . ... .. . .... ......... ...... ..... . ..... ........ 5 Glossary of chess symbols .. . .. . .. . ........... . ... .. . ...... . .... . . . .. 6 Introduction· ....... .. . . . . . . .. ..... . ... ... . . .. . ..... .. . . ........... 9
11
Open Games
Centre Game . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13 Danish Gambit· . .. .. ... .......... . .. . ....... .. .. ... ..... .. . ... ... 15 Bishop's Opening · .. . ... . . ..... . .. . . . ...... . . .. .. .. .......... . . . .. 17 Vienna Game· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19 King's Gambit · . .... .. . ........... ........ .. ... ............... .... 22 Latvian Counter-Gambit· ...... . ..... . . . ... ... ... .. ... . ............ . 30 Other Minor Lines after 2.ttJf3 ... ... . ... . . ..... ... .. . . . . . .. .... . ..... 32 Philidor Defence · ... ... .. .. ... ...... . ..... ..... . . .... .... ...... ... 33 Petroff Defence· . . . . ........ ... ......... .. ... ..... ... .... ..... . ... 36 Ponziani Opening .. .. . ...... .. . . .... . ... .. .... . ...... .. . .... ... . . . 42 Goring and Scotch Gambits · ... ..... . ... . ......... .......... .. .... 43 Scotch Game· . ..... . . . .... ..... ........ ...... . .. . ....... . .... . ... 45 Four Knights Opening· ... .... ... .... . . .. .... .. .. ......... ... ... .. .. 49 Hungarian Defence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 Evans Gambit ...... ... ..... ... ...... ... .. . .. .. . ........ .... ...... 53 Giuoco Piano .... . .. .. ... . . ... .... . . ..... ... ............ ... . . . . . . 57 Italian Game .... . ..... .. ... ... ....... .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. ..... . . . . ... . 59 Two Knights Defence ... . . . ... . .... . .. . . .. .... ... ..... .... . . . . . .... 62 Ruy Lopez· .... . .. . ............... ..... . ....... ..... .... ... ...... 67 - Ruy Lopez without 3 ... a6 · ...... ....... ........ ... . .... . ......... 69 - Ruy Lopez with 3 ... a6 . . .. . ... . . ........... . ... .. . . . .. . ......... 77 Exchange Variation . .. .. ..... ................. .... . . ......... 78 - Minor Variations after 4 ..lka4· ... ....... . ......... .... .......... 83 - Steinitz Defence Deferred .. ........ . .. . . ...... . . ..... ......... 84 - Archangel and New Archangel Variation .. ..... . ......... .. .. . .. . 87 - Open Variation· ......... .. ........... ..... . .... . ... .. .. .... . 90 - Minor Variations after 5 ... Jle7· ......... ........... .. .. ... .. ... . 99 - Marshall Attack· ... .. . . ... . . . .... ......... ..... .... .. . .... . 101 - Closed Variation· .. .... ......... .. ... ... .. .............. . ... 106
Semi-Open Games
117
Minor Defences after I .e4· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Owen Defence ·· ·· .. ...... .. ... ..... . . . . . ... . . . . .. . . ......... . ... Nimzowitsch Defence · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. Scandinavian Defence· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
I 19 120 120 122 7
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I Alekhine Defence· ..... . .. . .. . ... . . ...... .. . . . . ... . . . ...... ... . . . 126 Modem Defence (without c4)· ... . ......... . ... . . . .... ...... . .. . . ... 131 Pirc Defence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 136 Caro-Kann Defence· ........ ... ... .... . . . .. . ... .... . ...... . .... ... 144 - Advance Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 - Exchange Variation and Panov-Botvinnik Attack· ..... .... . ........ . 154 - Main Line· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 French Defence· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. 170 - Exchange Variation· .................... . . .. . ..... . . . . .. .. .. .. 173 - Advance Variation· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 - Tarrasch Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 179 - Rubinstein Variation· ....... . ........... .. ......... ..... ..... .. 188 - Classical Variation· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 - Winawer Variation· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 197 Sicilian Defence ........... .. .. .... ............... ... ..... .... ... 218 - Alapin Variation· .. . . . ... . .. ..... ... .. ...... . . . .. .. ...... .. ... 222 - Minor Systems after 2.ttlc3 ttlc6 . . . ... ... . ......... ...... . . ... ... 227 - Closed Sicilian· .... ...... .. . ....... .. . . ..... ... ...... ... ... .. 229 - Minor Systems with 2.ttlf3· .... ...... ....... .... ... ............ . 234 - Rossolimo Variation· . . . ..... ...... ............ .. ... . . . .. . .. . . . 237 - Variations with ... 'ifb6 ....... .. ............................. . .. 243 - De La Bourdonnais and Kalashnikov Variations· .... . . . ............ . 244 - SveshnikovlLasker-Pelikan Variation· ............. . . .. ........... 247 - Accelerated Dragon· ............... . . . . . ......... . . .. .... . . . .. 253 - Minor Systems after 2 ... e6 ......... . ......... : .... ..... ..... . ... 262 - Pin Variation· .... .. ...................... .. .... . .. . .......... 263 - Kan Variation· ..... . ..... . ... ....... ......... ... ... .. . . ...... 265 - Paulsen-Taimanov ..................... . ..... .. . . .... .. ... .. .. 270 - Four Knights Variation· ................ .. ................... . .. 276 - Moscow Variation .............. . . . ............ . . ... ...... . . .. 279 - Minor Variations . . .......... . . . . . . . ... ......... .......... ... . 283 - Classical Sicilian· . .......... . ... . .............. .......... ... . 287 - Richter-Rauzer··· · ·············· · ············ ·········· · ··· 289 - Dragon Variation .. ...... .. . ......... . . . ........ .......... . .. . 295 - Scheveningen Variation · .. .............. . ......... ... ..... . . . .. 306 - Sozin-Velimirovic Attack .. ........... . .. . ........ ... ...... ... . 316 - Najdorf Variation· ... . . . ................ . ..................... 325 - Najdorf 6.i¥.e2 .. . . . ................. .. ... . ................ . 330 - Najdorf 6.Jll.e3 .. . . .................. . . . . . . . .............. . . 333 - Najdorf 6 . ~g5 ........ .. .. ..... ....... . . ... .. ... ........ .. . 337 Index of Games · ...... .......... ....... ..... ... ... ....... ..... .. . 353
8
Introduction
Introduction
What is the best move in this position? Our great-grandparents would not have h esitated for a second: the move 1.e4!. It occupies the centre and allows for the development of the king's bishop and the queen. This book is about this move, and all of Black's probable replies. We will discuss closed games in the later volumes of this series, thus completing this overview of the ideas and objectives of all the openings. And what is Black's best response to l.e4? Once again there used to be few doubts: I. .. e5!. This fights against White's expansion in the most natural way, or so it was thought at the end of the 19th century. Indeed, until that time the vast majority of games had begun with these two moves. Why then is it that today only 10% of games begin 1.e4 e5, which are the moves that define the branch of opening theory known as the Open Games? The answer is that over a hundred years of tournament experience has demonstrated that
there is no Single opening or variation that is able to magically give a clear advantage to White, or easy equality to Black. Instead there are various systems that are more or less equal in terms of statistical success in tournaments, but that are very different indeed in terms of style and the type of positions they create. Some could say that the Sicilian is the best defence against 1.e4, given that Black wins 47% of the games, compared to 44% for the Open Games, or 45% for the Caro-Kann. But this begs the question why a player such as Karpov, who was World Champion for 10 years, virtually never plays the Sicilian. Evidently, su ch an aggressive defence is not suited to his solid positional style. For this reason it is important to know, at least in general terms, the characteristics of all the openings, so as to choose the one that is best suited to your own personal taste and style. And once we have decided on an opening, should we remain faithful to it for the rest of lives, or should we frequently flirt with other systems? Here opinions differ. Needless to say, if a player always uses the same opening they will end up knowing it very well (Grandmaster Wolfgang Uhlmann's dedication to the French Defence comes to mind) . On the other hand, in the age of computers and the Internet, it only takes a few seconds to find the details of another player's repertoire. As a result, players with a predictable repertoire will find themselves sitting opposite adversaries who are very well prepared. The renowned English grandmaster and ope9
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
ning expert John Nunn wrote that until recently the advantages and disadvantages of a limited opening repertoire balanced themselves out, but with the advent of the computer age the balance was now clearly in favour of the player with a large repertoire. Indeed, today it is very easy to familiarize yourself with a new system with the help of a book or DVD that explains the opening's general concepts, a good database, and a variation table. This preparation allows you to surprise your opponent and to play the variation most suited to the occasion, and also perhaps to your mood at the time. It is no mere coincidence that a player like Karpov, with his highly limited opening repertoire, has difficulty in the opening phase when playing against the younger champions who were born in the computer age. Obviously, most of us are not champion players, and we have neither the time, nor the desire, to expand our opening repertoire. However, we would suggest
10
- if possible - that you use a minimum of two opening systems for both White and Black. This will also enlarge your understanding of the game, and you will see the benefits of this in an improved performance in the middlegame. As the Dutch grandmaster Jan Timman wrote, 'A wide opening repertoire keeps your thinking flexible' . It comes as no surprise that this great player knows, and plays, almost all of the openings. In these books we will discuss all of the openings, so as to give the reader a broad but not superficial overview. We will not only give you the specific moves played, but more importantly an understanding of the ideas behind each system. To h elp us with this goal we will observe the traditional division into open, semi-open and closed games; not only for clear organization but also because it makes learning about them easier.
Open Games
Centre Game Danish Gambit Bishop's Opening Vienna Game King's Gambit Latvian Counter-Gambit and other minor variations Philidor Defence Petroff Defence Ponziani Opening Goring Gambit and Scotch Gambit Scotch Game Four Knights Opening Hungarian Defence Evans Gambit Giuoco Pianissimo Italian Opening Two Knights Defence Ruy Lopez
II
Centre Game
4. 1Wd4-e3! With this move (suggested by the Syrian player Stamma in the 18th century!) White prevents the feeing move dS by Black and prepares lLlc3, ~d2 followed by 0-0-0 with good piece play. 4. ... lLlg8-f6!
Centre Game , .e2-e4 e7-e5 2.d2-d4 e5xd4
3.'i"d1 xd4
:~
White is playing a type of Scandinavian with an extra tempo (the pawn is already well placed on e4, while in the Scandinavian it is rare that Black manages to get his pawn to eS). White prepares for a quick 0-0-0. White will have active piece play and he will be able to exploit the space advantage which arises from the central pawn structure with a white pawn on e4 and a black pawn on d6. Of course Black has his own trumps to play: after the natural 3. ... lLlb8-cG The white queen is forced to move and White loses a tempo. This in itself was sufficient reason for the Centre Game to quickly become a museum piece and to be scoffed at for decades. However, its recent adoption, even if occasional, by very strong players the likes of Morozevich, Adams and Judit Polgar has, in part, led to are-evaluation of the opening.
Black must play actively, so as not be left with a structurally inferior position without compensation. 5. lLlb1-c3 M8-b4 S... ~e7!? 6.~c4! (after the uninspired 6 .~d2, Black obtains good play with 6 .. .dS!) 6...0-0 7 . ~d2!. 6. £l.c1-d2 0-0 7. 0-0-0 ~f8-e8
Now the e4-pawn is under a great deal of pressure and White sacrifices it to maintain active play. This can be done in two different ways. 13
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Romero Holmes,Alfonso Karpov,Anatoly
Method No 1: S. ~f1-e4
Madrid J 992 (8)
.i. 'iii I. ~'
.I
j.. j. "j. j.
,
~ ;."
.~ ~ :"~
" j. 'j. j.
4il ",
See the Romero Holmes-Karpov example game in the appendix. Method No 2: S. 'i!Ve3-g3
The strongest response to this move is 8 .. Jhe4! The resulting positions are dynamically balanced, and even if against correct play White cannot expect an objective advantage. it is clear that in practical play the opening is still an excellent surprise weapon. Most of the time black players will be unprepared for an opening that is so rarely played. and which is very much better than its reputation would suggest.
14
1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.'iltxd4 ti:lc6 4.'ife3 tLlf61 [4 ...~e7 S.~d2 ti:lf6 6.ti:lc3 0-0 7.0-0-0 dS 8.exdSti:lxdS 9Jtg3 with chances for both 'sides. Mie'ses-Alekhine, Scheveninge~ 1913] 5.ti:le3 Ab4 6.ii.d2 0-0 7.0-0-0 ile8 8.~c4 d6 [8 ... L c3 9 ..i.xc3 ti:lxe4 10:ii'f4 ti:lf6 11 .ti:lf3 d6 12.ti:lgS h6 ' 13.~d3 h6 14.h4 Winawer-Steinitz , 1896 (1-0 at m~;"e 26)] 9.13 ti:la5 , :10...tb3 ti:lxb3+ 11.axb3 a51 [1 1... dS? 12.tbXdS tLlxdS 13.'fi'd4!] 12JWf2 ..td7 13.ti:lge2 a4 14.bxa4 ~a4 ' 15.ti:lb1 ~e516.ge3 b617•..td4 iLd7 1S.g4 11a5 19.tbf4 ..te6 20.J:thg1 .ti:ld7 21.ti:lh51? 96 22.Wd2!? ..txd4 23.1!Vxd4 gxh5 24.gxh5+ ..t?f8 25.'fi'g7+ 'i!;e7 26.1:1g5? [26.f41 'i¥a8 (26 ... .L.e4!? 27.J:tgeJ dS 28.M! l:ra2 , 29JIxe4+ dxe4 30.'iVgS+ 'ittf8 ,·3J.'iYh6+=) 27.eS! dxeS 28.'tlfgs+! (28.fxeS J:rxeS-+ is Karpov's evaluation) 28 ... .f6 (28 .. .'Jt>f8! 29:iYh6+ cJ;;e7 . 30.VWgS+=) 29.'fifS!! Wd830.l:tg7 'i!;c8 31. J:rdxd7 h d7 3 2.'ii'Xd7 + Wb7 33.'iYxc7+ 'iita6 34.M! l'lc8! 3S.'iVf7! l:ta4 36.'ffb3 bS with an unclear positi- , 'on] 26 ...~a8 27.b4 1:txg5 2S.'ii'xg5+ f6 29.'ikg7+ 'if.id8 30:~xh7 'ii'a2 ' 3UWh6 cJ;;c8 32:~f4 lthS 33.h6 ' 1IfgS 34.11d3 ~g5 0-1
Danish Gambit
Danish Gambit 1.o2-e4 e7-e5 2.d2 -d4 e5xd4
3.c2 -c3
Here we have a gambit where White sacrifices two pawns for a clear lead in development. If Black takes both pawns with 3. d4xc3 4. ~f1-c4 c3xb2 5. ~c1xb2 he would be well advised to return at least one of the two pawns with 5. d7-d5! 00'
given the fact that hanging on to the material with S ... d6 appears to be dangerous (see the Mieses-Marshall game for an illustration of this).
White's best move is 6. ~c4xd5! and Black responds with 6. ... tLlgS-f6! Black also returns the second pawn to achieve complete equality after 7. .1i.d5xf7+ ~eSxf7 S. 'itVd1xdS ~fS-b4+ 9. ~dS-d2 ~ b4xd2+ 10. tLlb1 xd2
This position, even if objectively equal, contains winning possibilities, as both sides have pawn majorities they can mobilize. Black can also refuse to accept the pawn on offer and play 3 ...dS.
After 4.exdS '\iVxdS, the position involves the typical strategic considerations and potential long-term prob15
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
lems around an isolated d4-pawn, but with active play for the white pieces. This position often arises in the Scotch Gambit. It is worth noting at this point that White should only sacrifice the c3 -pawn, not the b2 -pawn as well: 1.e4 e5 2.M exd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.tLlxc3
l::IxfS'" 26.ndj' "h6 27.~e3 n xf3 28.~e5 itxe5 29.tLlxe5 b6 30.tbe4 ' .lleS 31.~g2 J:.a3 32.J::te1 .l:txa2+ . 33.'~h3 e5 34.tbg5 lta3+ 35.Wg2 , 0-1 , li.lf4+ 36.~f2 J:.f8
MiesesJacques Marshall,Frank Monte Carlo 1903 (14)
1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.e3 dxe3 4.~e4 exb2 5.hb2 d6 6.tLie2 tLJe6 7.0-0 ' ~e6 S.~d5 tLJf6 9.'ifb3 .,;veS 10.tLJf4 : tbdS 11 ..bf6 gxf6 12.tLJh5 e6 ' 13.J:.e1i1..e7 14.'iff3 ngS 15.tLJxf6+ . 16.'\!Yxf6 exd5 17.exd5 ):[g6 ' lS.'WhS+ ~d7 19.tbe3 hd5 20.'ifeS+ Wc7 21.tLJxd5+ wbS !22.J:ae1 tLJe6 23.J:.xe6 bxe6 24.J:.b1X 1-0
:.bf6
and after 4 ... tLlc6, White can continue with 5.~c4, or 5.tLJf3 (usually you will reach the resulting position by 1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 tLlc6 3.d4 exd4 4.c3 dxc3 5. tLlxc3 - see the Goring Gambit).
D1ll1Iie,Alex Hjartarson.Johann . Philadelphia 1997 (6)
1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.e3 dxe3 4 ..ic4 d6 5.tLJxe3 tLJd7 6.tLlf3 tLJb6 7.0-0 tLJxc4 S:l'!lfa4+ e6 9.'iWxc4 ~e6 .10.'ilfe2 tbf6 11.iLg5 iLe712.J:.fd1 0-0 13.tbd4 Ag4 14.13 .td7 15.e5. dxe5 16.'iVxe5 J:.eS 17.tLJf5 :.tfS lS....g3 tbh5 19.'ifg4 .,;vb6+ 20.~h1 iLxf5 21.'\!bf5 ....xb2 22.tbe4 "'e5 23.l'i'xe5 J:.xe5 24.g4 f5 25.gxf5 ,',
16
,/:.
Schulz,Hans Jiirgen Dunne,Paul Hamburg 2005 (4)
..
,1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.e3 dxe3 4.il..e4 exb2 5 ..bb2 d5! 6 ..bd5 ttJf6 7.tLJe3 \ ~e7 S.tfb3 0-0 9.J:d1 'iifeS : 10.tLJge2 tLJbd7 11.tLJg3 c6 12..tc4 : ttJe5 13.~e2 ~e6 14.1We2 , tLJc4 : 15...tc1 lIdS 16.0-0J:.xd1 17.l:txd1 tLJb6 lS.h3 'ti'eS 19.wh2 I.tdS 20.txf1 'iVbS 21.14 ' ~e4 . 22.e5 tbfd5 ' 23.ttJxd5 cxd5 24.Ji.b2 ~fS 25...td4 iLxe2 26.'iWxe2 tLlc4 : 27.trg4 J:.eS ; 2S.tLJh5 J:.e6 29.tbf6+ whS 30.tLJd7 'We8 31.tLJxfS 'iixf8 32.f5 ttJxe5 , 33.'iWg3 tLJc6 34.fxe6 ttJxd4 35.J:.xf7 "gS 36.1Wd6 ttJb5 37.Wle7 'ti'bS+ ' 3S.wh1 wgS 39.l:txg7+ 1-0
Bi shop 's Opening
Bishop's Opening 1.e2 -e4 e 7-e5 2 . ~f1-c4
'-4
',." ,
.,',
:
With 2.i.c4 White not only attacks fl, which is the weakest point in Black's defence, but also begins harmonious development, as suggested by Philidor in the 18th century, with the usual moves d3, ttJc3, f4 or ttJf3, etc. - the sort of moves every beginner learns right from the start. The bishop on c4 also has the advantage of helping to prevent his opponent's pawn advance to d5, which generally frees Black's pOSition in the Open Games. The only negative aspect is that Black, not having yet developed the b8-knight, can ambitiously plan to push the pawn to d5 by advancing his c7-pawn to c6. However, this is a risky strategy and usually Black prefers to play ... ttJc6, re-entering the typical set-up of the Giuoco PianisSllnO or Vienna GanIe. lLlgS-fS! 2 .... This is the most logical move, as it attacks the undefended e4-pawn. 2 .. .i.c5 is also playable. Make sure you avoid the
beginner's mistake 2...iLe7?, which loses a pawnafter3. ~h5!.
After 2 .. .ttJf6, and 3.ttJc3, you transpose into the Vienna GanIe. The alternative 3.d4!? can complicate play, as in the variation 3 ... exd4 4.ttJf3 ttJxe4 5:~xd4, which is known as the Urusov GanIbit. It is perhaps unsound, but in practical play it proves to be highly dangerous. However, White's best option is 3. d2-d3 Now 3 ...d5?! would leave the e5-pawn very weak: 4.exd5 ttJxd5 5.ttJf3 ttJc6 6.0-0 and then .t:[el. If Black does not want to transpose to other systems with 3 ... ttJc6, he can try 3. c7-cS 4. ttJg1-f3 d7-d5 ~fS-dS 5. ~c4-b3! If 5 ... ~b4+ 6.c3, and only now 6 ... ~d6, White cannot develop the bI-knight to c3 . However, the c3-pawn could be an advantage in the fight for the centre. S. ttJb1-c3 d5xe4 7. ttJf3-g5! 0-0 S. ttJc3xe4 ttJfSxe4 9. iLlg5xe4
X~ "
.t. ".t. .t.
White has a small but unpleasant initiative.
17
Chess Opening Essential s - Volume 1
,
Alexeev,Evgeny Shirov,Alexey . Germany Bundeshga 2006/07 (8)
~,
·1.e4 e5 2.~c4 tbf6 3.d3 c6 4.tbf3 dS S..tb3 .td6 6.exdS tbxd51? [6 ... cxdS 7.~gS tbc6 S.tbc3 d4 9.tbdS ~e6 10.0-0 hdS 11 .~xdS h6 f2~Lf6 ~xf6 13.c3 dxc3 14.bxc3 0-0 IS .J:Ibl l:tabS 16.~a4 ~cS 17 JWe4 ~b6 IS:h c6 bxc6 19.1t'xeS± Ivanchuk~ L.Dominguez, Havana 200SJ 7.0-00-0 SJle1 ~g4 9.h3 .thS 10.g4 .tg6 11.tbxeS ~xeS12.l:txeS tbd713.l:te1 'ilfh4 14:~f3 l:taeS 1SJ U1 hS 16.tbc3 tbxc3 17.bxc3 e1 tbfS 30.J:l.xeS l:txeS+ 31.'it>d2 J:1e2+ 32.wd3 J:xf2 33.l:l.e1 .tg2 34JleS ' itxh3 3S.J:IgS+ wf6 36.~c7 J::tf3+ 37.wd2 g4 3S.~dS+ w eS 39•.tc7+ wd4 40..td6 g3 41 J ldS 0-1
Adams,Michael 'Kramnik,Vladimir '.
,~
Tilburg 1998 (7)
1.e4 eS 2.1t.c4 tbf6 3.d3 c6 4.tbf3 dS S..tb3 .td6 6.tbc3 dxe4! [6 ....te6?! 7.AgS!; 6... d4 not ideal for Black, nevertheless playable] 7.tbg5! [7.dxe4 tba6 is satisfactory for ' Black] : 7... 0-0 S.tbcxe4 tbxe4 9.tbxe4 : [9.dxe4
18
•itb4; ' i'0 .~'3·' ~~dl + i~i .'~xdii.ci=j' 9 ....tf5! 10.~f3 .txe4 11.dxe4 Qjd7 . 12.c3 [12.0-0 tbcs 13 ..tc4 b5 14.£id3 . (14,.te2 ~h4) 14.. .tbe6 IS .c3 .i6=J ,12 ...a5 13.a4 [13.0-0 (allows) 13 ... a4 14.itc2 tbcS=] 13 ...tbc5 14.itc2 b5!? [14 ...tbe6 IS.OcO '4We7::=l 1S.0-0 'WIc7 16.l:td1 :tabS 17.axbS cxbS 1S.g3 b419.cxb4 J:txb4 20.~d2 l:txb21f2_1f2
Fedorov,Alexey Shirov,A!exey .. ' . Leon Ech-tt 2001 (8)
1.e4 e5 2.~c4 tbf6 3.d3 c6 4.tbf3 dS . S..tb3 £id6 6.tbc3 dxe4 7.tbgSO-0· 'S.tbcxe4 tLixe4 9.tbxe4 as 10.\\Yh5! ' .§l.b4+1. [10."ii,e7 11... 3 a4 . 12 .~a2. tbd7 13.0-0 with a slight advantage for White] 11.'it>f1!? [11.c3 £i.e7=; 1L..ti'xd3? 12 tbg5! b c3+ 13.bxc3 ~xc 3+ 14, ~e2 ..\1l.gH (14 ...~fS· IS .L f7+ w hS 16. ~dl! 'il'xal. 17,.ta3+-) lS.'iYxg4 ~xal 16.~fs· with a strong attack] 11...~e7 12.a4 tbd7 13.h4 .tbcS ' 14.tbxc5 h cs 15JWxeS .td4 16:~'g5?! 'fIfb6! 17..te3 .§l.e6 1S..tIa3 lUeS 19.Wg1 [19 .he6 .txe3! 20 .'iVxe3 ~xb2=J 19... h6 20.'iYf4 :t.adS 21..Uh3 1Wb4 22..txe6? [22.c3!? dynamically maintains the balance] 22 ...l:ixe6 23.~xd4 Uxd4 24:iWbS+ ~h7 2S.:t.b3 'iVe1+ 26.'it>h2 ~xf2 27J!t'g3 'i¥xc2 2S.J::tc3 ~xb2 29.l:[c4 l:Ig6 30. ~f3 lIxd3 . O-~
Vienna Gam e
Vienna Game 1.e2-e4
e7-~5
2. ~b1-c3
Black should not have many problems if White plays the solid 3.g3. After 3. ~f1-c4 Black has a more complicated task, and must choose between two very different continuations: A)
White controls the d5 -square and plans the advance of the f-pawn . The Vienna Game was developed in Vienna around 1850 by Carl Hamppe, as an attempt to play an improved version of the King's Gambit. However, in the modern approach the choice of 2. tt:Jc3 is not always made with the intention of advancing the f2-pawn, but rather as part of a more solid deployment with the move JiLc4 , or even g 3, developing the fl -bishop by way of a fianchetto. However, after 2 ...tt:lc6, White can in fact create some headaches for Black with 3.f4!. More logical would be the move 2. ... liJgB-fS which, by counterbalancing the pressure on the centre squares, makes it possible to respond to the thematic 3.f4 with 3 ... d5! 4.fxe5 tt:Jxe4 with a complex but balanced position.
3 ....
liJfSxe4
An apparent knight sacrifice: However, in reality after 4.tt:Jxe4 d5, Black regains the piece, with a fluid game. If White instead avoids the pawn fork by first sacrificing the bishop with 4 .~xf7+, then 4 ...'lt>xf7 5. tt:Jxe4 d5!, and Black's dominant centre is more than sufficient compensation for the exposed king. However, the best move for White is 4. ~d1-hS! This move leads to a long sequence of forced moves with the inventively picturesque name Frankenstein-Dracula Variation. It is very popular with correspondence players. After liJe4-dS 4. ttJ bB-cS S. ~c4-b3! g7-gS S. ttJc3-bS! f7-fS 7. 'ithS-f3 B. 'i¥f3-dS 19
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I B)
the threat to f7 forces Black to move his queen, losing control of the c7-square. Now after 8. ... ~d8-e7 9. tbb5xc7+ We8-d8 10. tbc7xa8
Black loses a rook. But with 10.... b7-b6 followed by ... itb7, he wins the a8-knight, and it is not clear, notwithstanding the large number of examples from tournament play, if Black's initiative along the light-square diagonal a8-h I compensates [or the exchange. What we can say is that with correct play White should maintain a certain advantage. However, in practice Black's position is not only easier to play, but also more [un. 20
3 ....
tbb8-c6
The most solid line: Black continues normally and after 4. d2-d3 he takes advantage of the fact that the knight is already on c3 by playing 4. ... ~f8-b4
which puts White's centre under pressure and prepares [or ... dS. A slightly more ambitious alternative exists for Black: 4 ... tbaS
Vienna Game
The objective is to acquire the bishop pair. The downside is that the move neglects development and concedes White good control of the centre after 5.
5 . .liLe1-g5 S. ~g5xfS 7. b2xe3
h7-h6! ~ b4xe3+1
'tWdSxfS
1: Mariotti,Sergio ~
t
Kortchnoi,Viktor " Rome 1982 (8)
,,1.e4 eS 2.
j"
;;' Ost Hansen,Jacob f : Nunn,John ;.
Teesside tt 1974
,;1.e4 eS 2.tbc3 ttJf6 3.$.c4 ttJxe4 4.~h5 llJd6 S.$.b3 llJc6 6.llJbS g6 , 7.'itf3 fS S.~d5 Wie7 9.tiJxc7+ It>dS ~10.ttJxaS b6 11.d3 i.b7 12.h4 f4 we have a balanced position in which ;,13...f3 ..th6 14."g4 e4 1S.i.xf4 White's central predominance compen- 'exd3+ 16.1t>f1 .bf4 17.ii'xf4 JUS sates for the doubled pawn on c3. ~1S.'itg3 llJe4 19.'ilYc7+ \&>eS 20.llJh3 ' ,ttJxf2 21.tiJxf2 'ili'e2+ 22.lt>g1 'iYxf2+ , < GjedSted;Soren 'Havn :' Y' ....: ..," °23.lt>h2 'ifxh4+ 24.Wg1fid4+ ; 25...tth2lbeS 26.llhf1 tLlg4+ 27.Wh3 Thingstad.Tormod ~e3+ 28...ttxg4 hS+ 29...tth4 gS+ ; Copenhagen 2006 (7) '" ;1.e4 · e5 Vbe3 lbeS 3.i.e4 i.e5 30...ttxh5 ; llh8+ 31.WgS .1t.e4+ 4.'ifig4 .ii'fS ' 5.ltJdS _bf2+ 6.\&>f1 : 32 ..tIfS .bfS+ 33 ...ttxf5 l:tf8+ 34.~g6 ''fie4+ 35.~g7 'iWe7+ , , ~d6 7>flx97 i.bS · S:ti'xh8 '!WgS 9.lbf3 >1;>fS 10.d3 d6 11.lbh4 'iWg4 36.~gS .' 'fIf6+ 37.~h5 'it'h8+ . 12.Ah6+ ~e813.lbf6+ 1-0 ~.8 :Wg4 'ifh4X ;. 0-1
21
Chess Open ing Essentials - Volum e I
King's Gambit 1.e2-c4 e 7- ~5 2.f2-f4
players; and indeed, if Black is well prepared, it is difficult for White to achieve an objective advantage. Black is naturally not obliged to accept the offered pawn, and for this reason - depending on Black's choice - the gambit is classified as either being declined or accepted.
King's Gambit Declined Black usually either continues solidly with 2 ... ~c S, or he counterattacks with 2 ...dS; but there is also a novelty: 2 ...lDc6. 11 should never be forgotten that White is not really threatening 3jxeS??, because of 3..:.h4+ followed by 4..:flxe4+ and Black is winning. The King's Gambit is one of those openings which have made chess history. It was enormously popular in the 19th century at the height of the Romantic era . However, it all but disappeared with the advent of the positional school at the beginning of the 20th century. In the 193 Os there was a partial re-evaluation thanks to the Swedish grandmaster Gosta Stoltz, who highlighted the positional merits of this gambit. The King's Gambit was now no longer seen simply as a means of violently attacking the f7 -square via the f-file and the usual ~c4, but as a way of conquering the centre, without ruling out the possibility of later simplification and an early endgame. Its occasional use by champion players such as Keres, Spassky, Bronstein, and even the great Bobby Fischer, and more recently Gallagher and Fedorov, has made the opening popular with lovers of sparkling and aggressive play. However, the King's Gambit is still viewed with a certain scepticism by top 22
A) 2 .... ~c5 This is highly logical , as it takes possession of the diagonal which has been weakened by advancing the pawn to f4 . After the obvious 3. ltJg1-f3 d7-d6
White can play along the lines of the Giuoco Pianissimo with 4. ltJb1-c3 ltJg8-f6 5. ~f1-c4 ltJb8-c6 6. d2-d3 and White has a minute advantage, but both players have chances.
King 's Gambit
Alternatively, he can more ambitiously prepare to take possession of the centre with 4.c3. After 4 ...tDf6 S.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 i..b6, it is not clear if White's impressive-looking centre is in actual fact a strength or a weakness.
son to think that Black - having played all the logical moves - has not at least a playable position. However, the most frequent move in modern times is c7-c6!? 3 . ...
The Falkbeer Counter-Gambit is without doubt the most active way to decline the King's Gambit. After B)
2 .... d7-d5 3. e4xd5 Black's original idea was to push the pawn to e4: 3 ... e4
with the ambitious goal of creating an obstacle to White's development and to highlight the unhappy placement of the f4-pawn, which in this position would be certainly better placed on f2. However, White will obviously play 4.d3!, threatening the advanced black pawn, and after 4 .. .tDf6! S.dxe4! tDxe4 6.tDf3 ..\kcs 7."ViIid i..fS (or 7 ...fS) 8 .tDc3 ~e 7, a position is reached where Black, with active piece play, will try to compensate for his material deficit. Opinions differ as to how much compensation there really is, but there is no rea-
This is just another of Aaron Nimzowitsch's countless contributions. For White to now take on c6 appears to be dangerous. The following line has proved to be the best for both players: 4. tDb1-c3 e5xf4! ~fS-d6 5. tDg1-f3 6. d2-d4 tLlgS-e7 7. d5xc6 tLlbSxc6 S. ~f1-c4 0-0 9. 0-0 jLcS-g4 10. tLlc3-e4 jLd6-c7 11. c2-c3 tLle7-g6 and we have a position in which White's strong centre is compensated for by the well-protected f4-pawn, which impedes White's developmente.g. of the c 1-bishop - and those are the ingredients of good piece play for Black. Remember that with 3 ... exf4!? 4.tDf3 Black transposes to the modern variation of the King's Gambit Accepted, having avoided the Bishop's Gambit 3 .~c4.
23
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
C)
2. 3. lDg1-f3
lDb8-c6!? f7-15!?
This is the latest fashion, but it is still not clear how good it is. There are some who have opined that it represents the refutation of the King's Gambit! But even if this line were as strong for Black as has been suggested, it is worth remembering that with 3.lDc3 instead of 3 .lDf3, White can enter a favourable variation of the Vienna Game.
To continue with 3... VWh4+ 4.';%;f1 at this point would facilitate White's development, as he can play lDf3 with tempo, followed by d2-d4. Therefore Black should seek counterplay in the centre with 3 ... lt:lf6! 4.lDc3 c6!
King's Gambit Accepted 2 .... e5xf4 Now the move ... ~h4+ is such a threat that White generally plays either 3 .~c4 (freeing the fl -square for the king) or 3.lt:lf3 (controlling h4) . Eccentric moves such as 3.lDc3 or 3. d 4 - wi th the idea of moving the king to e2 after the queen check on h4 - would have some appeal to a player from the Romantic period, but are fundamentally ill advised. 3 .~c4, sometimes called the Bishop's Gambit, is not to be underestimated. Evidence of this is its employment by Fischer on several occasions, admittedly against lesser players, but with a noteworthy performance of I 00%. 24
and after 5.~b3 d5, you reach a dynamically balanced position. 3. lDg1-f3
King's Gambit
After this knight move, which is by far the most popular, Black has eight perfectly playable replies: A) 3 .... h7-h6 In the Becker Defence Black prepares the pawn push ...g7 -gs, ready to respond to h4 with ... ~g7. Now an interesting move is 4.b3!? to prepare the possession of the long dark-squared diagonal. B) ttJg8-e7 3 .... has been undervalued because of a beautiful victory by Fischer playing with the white pieces. In reality this knight move is much better than its reputation would suggest : it supports dS and it prepares to defend the f4-pawn from g6 or ds. Now the natural moves are 4.d4 ds s.ttJ c3 dxe4 6. ttJxe4.
White's central domination seems more significant than Black's extra pawn. D) 3 .... ~f8-e7 is the Cunningham Defence: after 4 ..i1l.c4 or 4.ttJc3, Black can continue solidly with ...ttJf6. Otherwise he could risk giving check with .. .~h4. This would prevent White from castling but leaves the bishop badly placed on h4. In both cases the resulting positions are complex and difficult to evaluate. E) d7-d5 3 .... is the Modern Variation: it was inspired by the old saying that the antidote to all gambits is to push the pawn to ds (!!). 4. e4xd5 ttJg8-f6!
The discovery of the move 6 ... tLld5! has led to a re-evaluation of this continuation. C) 3 .... ttJg8-f6 is the Schallopp Defence, which counterattacks the e4-pawn and which also allows the knight to transfer to hs supporting the f4-pawn . After 4.es (4.ttJc3 is interesting) 4 ... ttJhs s.d4
Black has denied White the pawn advance to es, which is so dangerous in the King's Gambit. However, after 25
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
S. ..tf1-c4
tLlfSxdS
Black needs to be careful: a well-timed, even if unnatural exchange on dS by the bishop could give White a slight positional advantage, and at times a dangerous initiative. Nevertheless, with correct play Black maintains equality. For example : S. ~c4xdS 'iVdSxdS 7. tLlb1-c3 'iVdS-dS 7 .. .~fS!? S. d2-d4 ~fS-e7 9. ~c1xf4 0-0 10.0-0 ~cS-fS 11. 'liVd1-d2
F)
3 .... 4.
tLlbS-cS!?
tLlb1-c3
We have transposed to the VieJUla Game.
G)
3 ....
you reach a strange position in which after six moves all of both player's pieces are still on their original squares! Strange in an opening where development is the most noteworthy characteristic! This is a clear example of the modern interpretation of this opening: White seeks to exploit the weakness of the pawns on f4 and g4 positionally, renouncing the classic attack against f7.
d7-dS
S. 7. tLlb1-c3 S. tLlg1-e2 9. g2-g3!
.lii.fS-hS c7-cS ~dS-fS
Play is complex. with possibilities for both sides. H)
3 ....
g7-gS
The Fischer Defence, which was so named following the publication of an article in which the American champion maintained that it refuted the King's Gambit! The goal is to play the .. .gS variations without having to deal with tLleS. But after 4. d2-d4 S. h2-h4! S. tLlf3-g1!
26
g7-gS gS-g4
This is called the Classical Variation. It is now well accepted that aggressive variations such as the Muzio Gambit
King's Gambit
and the like, which come from 4 ..ilLc4 g4 (4 ... .ilLg 7!) S.O-O!? gxf3 6. ~xf3, do not promise White any advantage. The only serious attempt remains 4. h2-h4! Undermining Black's pawn chain. 4. ... g5-g4 5. tiJf3-e5! The move S.ttlgS introduces the Allgaier Gambit, which is considered unsound. After S... h6! 6.ttlxj7 <Ji;xj7, White does not have enough compensation for the piece. The next diagram (after S.tt::leS!) is the key position of the Kieseritzky Gambit.
White moves the knight several times, but gains the g4-pawn or the one on f4, at times losing the e4-pawn. The pawn push to h4 weakens White's kingside (in some variations a black knight lands on g3 via hS), but Black's king is also in a rather precarious position. As a result the continuations that arise are tactically complex and have strategic possibilities for both players. Black can continue with S ... d6, sacrificing the g4-pawn in exchange for good piece play after 6.tt::lxg4 tt::lf6 7.tt::lxf6 ~xf6, or he can play the classical 5. ... tiJgS-f6 Now, modern theory suggests 6. d2-d4
Preparing for the knight's retreat to d3. The old move 6..ilLc4 has proved to be ineffective becauseof6 ... dS 7.exdS Yld6. 6. d7-d6 7. tiJ e5-d3 tiJf6xe4 ~c1xf4
S.
.i •
.a'i¥'~.t
', '.&. , ; i.
'
&
:" , ".. , (
i
The key position of the Classical Variation of the King's Gambit Accepted. It seems to go against common sense to concede the e4-pawn for the one on f4: in addition Black has an extra pawn and an active knight on e4. Nonetheless, White receives good compensation: Black's kingside has many weaknesses, the g4-pawn, even though a material advantage, has the negative quality of restricting black activity on that wing, and perhaps Black would be better off without it (as is the case in the S ... d6 variation). In addition, White's rooks on eland fI will exert unpleasant and ongoing positional pressure. This is also the case in variations in which the queens are exchanged. Black almost always castles queenside. White sometimes castles queenside too, and on other occasions he moves the king to d2 or otherwise to fl. In conclusion, after 8 ... ~e7 or 8 ... .ilLg 7, the position is dynamically balanced. 27
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
'"Spielmann,Rudolf ;. Tarrasch,Siegbert Karlsbad 1923 (7) 1.e4 eS 2.f4 ~cS 3.tlJf3 d6 4.c3 .i.94 S.fxeS dxeS S.'ifa4+ ~d7 7.ffc2 tlJcS 8.b4 ~d6 9.il.c4 ttJf6 10.d3 tlJe711.0-0 tlJgS 12.il.e3 bS 13.i1.b3 as 14.a3 axb4 1S.cxb4 0-0 16.tlJc3 cS 17.h3 'i'ie7 18.ttJe2 ~b8 , 19.~h2 ~a7 20.il.9S ' hS 21.~xf6 iYxf6 22.ttJfd4 'tWd6 23.ttJfS .txfS 24.l:Ixf5 ttJf4 25.ln1 9S 26.l:I1xf4 exf4 27.e5 'fie7 28.1:[16 '''''97 29.d4 .b d4 ' 30.~xf7 .b e5,31.llfxgS+ 1-0
SchultenJohn William . Morphy,Paul ' New ¥orkhlirid m 1857
1.e4 e5 2.f4 dS 3.exdS e4 4.ttJc3 ttJfS S.d3 ~b4 6 ..td2 e3 7.b e3 0-0 8.~d2 ~xc3 9.bxc3 tre8+ 10..te2 ~g4 11.c4 c6 12.dxcS ttJxc6 13.""f1 n xe2 14.ttJxe2 tlJd4 1S.\'Wb1 .be2+ ,1 6.c.t'f2 ttJg4+ 17.~g1 tlJf3+18.9xf3 ~d4+ 19.~g2 "'f2+ 20.~h3 'iYxf3+ 0-1 ·21.""h4 tlJh6 22.~g1 ttJfS+
Andei-s~~;Adolr' "' Kieseritzky,lionel London 1851
1.e4 eS 2.14 exf4 3..tc4 'iYh4+' 4.~f1 bS S.~~bS 0 fS 6.tlJf3 llfh6 7.d3 [7.~c3!l 7... tlJh511 8.tlJh411 ~gS 9.tlJfS ' c6 10.g41 [iO ,~a4±] 10...tlJf6 (10 ... g6!?] 11.%1911 cxbS1, 12.h4 'fig6 13.h5 'iWgS 14.'i'if3 ttJg8': ' 1S.il.xf4 ~f6 , 16.tlJc3 ~cS 17.~d5 ' 'iYxb218..td6 [critidzedbyEuwe: 18.:: d4 was winning. But despite of all mistakes (it was a friendly game) this is' known asthe.Immortal Game because of 'its brilli~t finish] 1a.~xg1 1 ( 18 .. :~xal+ J9.c.t>e2 'iYb2!] 19.eS! ~xa1+ 20.c.t>e2 ' ~a6 21.tlJxg7+ <;tid8 22.'iYf6+11 tlJxfG 23~e7X 1-0
Pasik,Ron '. •. FernandezJaime Wichita 2006 (5)
,~
;;
.
1.e4 eS' 2.f4 exf4 3.tlJf3 h6 4.h4 tlJfG S.tlJc3 ttJhS 6.il.c4tLlg3 7.l:th2 tlJxe4 8.'iYe2 ' :, 1-0
r
~t,_
Spielmann,Rudolf Tarrasch,Siegbert , Miihrisch Ostrau 1923 (11) ,
1.e4 e5 2.14 dS (2...exf4 3.'iWf3!? Spielmann-Tarrasch, Gothenburg '192 0]
3.exd5 · e4 4.d3 tlJf6 S.dxe4 tlJxe4 6.ttJf3 ~c5 7.1We2 ," ~f5 8.94 0-0 9.gxfS ~e8 10.~g2 tlJf2 11.tlJeS tlJxh1 12..bh1 tlJd7 [12 ... f6 13.d6!] 13.ttJc3 fS 14.tlJe4 fxeS 1S.ttJxc5 tlJxc5 ,. 16.fxe5 'ifh4+ 17.~f1 %1f8 ,18.c.t>g1 'iid4+ 19.i.e3 l!fxeS 20.tre1 tlJd7 ' 21.1i'c4 wh8 22.$.e4 UaeS 23.il.d4 9f4 24.Ue2 tlJf6 2s ..bfS gxf6 26.h3 %1g8+ 0-1 28
Reti.Richard Flamberg,Alexander
"
1912 (4) 1.e4 eS 2.f4 exf4 3.4:Jf3 9S 4Jii.c4 94 , 5.0-0 dS 6.exd5 gxf3 7.'i'ixf3 ~d6 8.d41i'fG 9....e4+ VJ6e710.~c3 tlJd7, 11 ~xf4 'Wxe4 ,12.tlJxe4 jLxf4' 13.'u'xf4 fS (13 .. ,tlJe7 14.d6] 14.l:txfS tlJe7 1S.:1e1I ' tlJb6 (IS ... tlJxfS ' 16,tlJd6+ Wf8 , 17Jle8 + c.t>g7' 18.tlJxf5+ ", wf6 19.tlx1l8 , c.t>xfS' "i oJhh7 ±] 16.~bS+ 'if;>d8 '[16...c6 17.&c6 bxc6 18..!:I.eS cxbS 19.tlJg5; 16 ....icl7 17 ..!:I.eS ,., .\txbS 18.d6±] 17.:1eS tlJ96 [17 ,.. tlJbxdS 18.tlJgS %1f8 , Opatija
h
King 's Gambit .,
.'
19 ..::4xdS+ ~xdS ,; 2Q,tLlf7+ llxf7 Spassky,Boris Fischer,Robert "21..::4e8X] 1S.li:Jg5 li:Jxe5 19.1:txe5 ·..td7 20.li:Jf7+ weS 21.li:JxhB · ~xb5 · Mar del Plata 1960 (2) 22.IIh5 .ac4 23.Uxh7 b dS 24.h4 1.e4 eS 2.14 exf4 3.tLlf3 gS [afterwards , Fischer suggested 3,':.d6!] 4.h4 g4 '.i 4e4 2S ..::4g7 .be2 26.h5 as 27.h6 'a4 2S.h7 .bh7 29.l:txh7 ~c4 30.li:Jf7 '· S.tLleS tLlfG 6.d4 · [6'.tLlxg4] 6_d6 , 7.tiJd3 ttJxe4 " S..hf4 iLg7 9.tLle3=i= ::'a6 31.94 li:Jxb2 32.11hS+ : ~d7 ! 33.li:JeS+ , ~e6 34.gS ' li:Jd1 , 3S.UfS [9,c3! 'fie7! (Fischer) J O.'iVe2 iill=i=] li:Je3 36.wf2 li:JdS 37.g6 1-0 9•.tLlxe3 10.bxe3 eS! 11 ..ie2 exd4 12.0-0 tLlc6 [lL.h5 13.ii,gS f6 14.iLcl - and li:Jf4: g6<. e6<, hS<] 13bg4 a-a Spielmann,Rudolf 14..b cS IDecS 1S.'iVg4 fS 16.~g3 Griinfeld,Ernst dxc3 17.::'ae1 [l7 .~6 lH6 18..if4 Teplitz-Schonau 1922 (7) ' , ..::4g6t explains why Fischer. always seek~ 1.e4 eS 2.14 exf4 3 ..tc4 li:Je6 4.tLlf3 'ing active play. had preferred 15 ... f5 to, .g5 S.O-O d6 6.d4 .tg7 7.e3 h6 S.g3 the qui.eter 1s...>t>h8] 17_WhS g4 9.tLlh4 f310.~d2 ~f6 11.tLldxf3 [17 ...'lWd7 18.h d6 11fe8 19.~S 'iWf7=i= ' gxf3 12.1Wxf3 Ilh7 13.tLlg6 Ilg7 Fischer was better according to an analysiS ', 14.~f4 ii,g4 15.'iVg2 j(.gS16.h3 .td7 .' by Kmoch and Antoshin] 1S.c;i;>h1? [z : 17.li:JhS .::4h7 1S.eS dxeS 19.'fk'e4 fS 18..L:d6 rlf619.iLe5 li:JxeS20.tbxeS 20.J:rxfS AxfS 21.'iVxfS [Tartakower: A , ., with some Compensation for the pawn] position in the best' tradition of the ' 1S~g8 19b d6 ~fSt [19 ... .id4] 20Jt.e5+ li:Jxe5 2H~h:e5+ :g7! , King's Gambit: Black, even though he is ' a rook up, is in a compl~tely hopeless 22.J:1xfS '[22.'i!VxfS 1!:Vxh4+ 23 .c;i;>gl positIon] . 21 ...Ile7 ' 22 ..lhgS hxgS 'iVg4' '' 24.'ti'xg4 (24.Wif2 iLd6-» "23J H1 ~d6 24..bgS exd4 25.~f8+ 24,.J.lxg4+; 22,Ilf4? iLd6":+: 22.tfff4? ' ~d7 26.'iWxaS ~eS 27.li:Jf6+ wd6 l:tg4-+] 22...'iVxh4+ 23.'it>g1 1!i'g4? ! 2S:iff8 'iieS 29.<;f.1g2 d3 30J U2 'i¥e1 " [Fischer's first mistake. but a rather seri~ 31JWh6 ,,' " 1-0 ", ous one; 23...~g3! waS given by Spassky himself as very good for Black: 24.'Wxg3 (24.'iWe2 .td6) 24...lhg3+ . !::. t; Fedorov,Alexey 2S ... lhc3] 24.11f2 1i.e7 2SJle4 ~gS " Shirov,Alexey . , 26:t!fd4! ::'f81 [Fischer admitted to hav-, Po)anica Zdroj 2000 (5) . ing overlooked Spassky's intended reply; :1.e4 e5 2.14 exf4 3.li:Jf3 g5 4.h4 g4 ·S.liJe5 d6 6.li:JXg4 li:Jf6 ' 7.li:Jf2 : gS . 26 ...i.fE! was enough for a dynamic balance: 27.1Wxa7 (27.li:JeS ..ltcs 28,li:Jf7+ S.d4 .ih6 9.li:Je3li:Je6 10.li:JdSli:JxdS Wg8 29.tbxgS .ixd4 30,l:IxM tIxgS=) 11.exd5 '/We7+ 12.1i.e2 ~b4 13.c4 ;i.fS 14.'iWa4+ wf8 1S.~xb4 lleS 27....id6=] 27.J:reS! [strangely Black 16.'fid2 J:{xg2 17.wf1 l:tg3 1S:~d1 now loseS a piece] 27... rtdS [27.;.'iVg6 ,iLe4 19.:Ih2 fS 20.li:Jxe4 - fxe4 . 28 ..uxe7+-; 27 ... 'fk'h4 " 28JhfE++-; 27 ... M 6 28.'ifd6!+-] 2S.~e4 ' ~h4 21.i.g4 e3 22 ..af3 ~g7 23.11h1 11g2 0-1 29.1:f4 [29 . ,:~Vg3 30.J:Lxe7 +-] 1-0 "
29
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Latvian Counter-Gambit
ment White can attack Black's centre by pushing it to d3 . 4. 5. tLJb1-c3!
1.c2-e4 t!7-c5 2.fLg1-f3 f7-f5
This is sometimes called the Greco Counter-Gambit, after the Calabrian Gioacchino Greco, who analysed a variety of lines in the early part of the 17th century. It was later revived by the Latvian Karl Behting, who studied it at the beginning of the 20th century. To playa type of King's Gambit with a tempo less is certainly not a particularly appealing choice for Black: the only advantage is that there is not the possibility of a queen check on hS and thus Black is gellllinely threatening 3 .. .fxe4, whereas fxeS in the King's Gambit is only an illusory threat. The best policy for White is to content himself with the good positional advantage that comes from A)
3. tLJf3xe5!
threatening both 4 ..\k.c4 and 4.llYhS+. 3. ... ~d8-f6 4.
tZle5-c4!
Better than 4.d4: the d-pawn is better placed on d2, so that at the right mo30
f5xe4
The active knights, the weak e4-pawn and the exposed black queen are all favourable for White. If White tries to aggressively punish the Latvian Counter-Gambit, Black's position will prove to have unexpected resources. B)
3. .I1!.f1-c4!? 4. tLJf3xe5
f5xe4
This position is so complex that it was not until the 197 Os that the move 4.
...
d7-d5!?
was considered playable. The classical continuation 4 ... ~gS would appear to give White an advantage after S.d4! 'l4Vxg2! 6.'lWhS+ g6 7. ~f7+! 'i£tdS S.L g6 'lWxhl+ 9.'i£te2 .
Latvian Counter-Gambit
However, opinions still differ on this adventurous line and Black can still use it in practical games. S. ~d1-hS+ g7-g6 6. lLleSxg6 h7xg6!
.! 6lA 'iV~ 'A' ~.i .1-; .t. ~..t.; ~'.A .~
White should be able to maintain some advantage here by either taking on h8 or g6. Nonetheless, the introduction of { .. .dS!? brought about a brief period of popularity for the Latvian CounterGambit. Today it is almost never played at a serious level, except by correspondence players, who in general like long forced lines of play. The Latvian fits the bill nicely in this respect and thus enjoys a certain popularity with this group ofplayers.
., 19.c~d5" c;d5 20.i.f3 ~e6" 21.l:ie1 , 'Wf7 22.tZlg4 ti:lxg4 23 ..bg4 $,xg4 24.Wxg4 'tWd6 25 ...bg5 1:(ag8 .26.'iWf5+ ~e8 27.l:iac1 · :txg5 2S.J:rc8+ 1-0 , Borozan.Nikola . Kovacevic,Slobodan Igalo tt 1994 (2)
1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 f5 3..ic4 fxe4 4.tZlxe5 ~95 5.d4 'iNxg2 S:ikVh5+ g6 7.i.f7+ ~d8 8.~xg6 '(\ixh1 + 9.~e2 c6 10.lLlc3 lLlf6 11:iWh4 . ~e7 [1 L .d6 12.~g5 (12.'ifxf6+ Wc7 13.'iNxh8±) I2 ...'l!!Vxa1 13.~xf6+ We7 14.~d8X] 12Ji.g5 ~xa1 13..ixf6 i.xt6 14.~xf6+ r:J;;c7 15.lLlc4 1:[g8 16.'l!!Ve5+ .. Wd8 17.lLld6 :tf8 1S.~g5+
Guido,Flavio Hector,Jonny Genova 1989 (10)
.
1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 f5 3.~c4 fxe4 4.lLlxe5 d5 5.1!i'h5+ g6 ' 6.lLlxg6 hxg6 7.1i'xg6+ wd7 S.i.xd5 tLlf6 9.tZlc3 '~e710.d4 exd3+ 11 ..te3 dxc2 12.'VWxc2 '{Wh7 13:~a4+ ~d8 14.i.gS iJ.e7 15.~f3 lLlfd7 16.~f4 Macieja,Bci.rtloiniej Vasquez,Rafael lLlc5 17.0-0-0 i.d7 18JWc4 ~f8 19.1ZJd5 .td6 20.~e3 lLlba6 21.IIhe1 Willemstad 2001 (3) b5 22.'fHc3 b4 23.'t4Yc4 .b3 24.axb3 ..1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3 fS 3/LlxeS ~f6 4.ti:lc4 I1bS ' 25.~g5+ ~c8 26.I1e3 ~xh2 fxe4 S.lLlc3 1Wf7 6.tLJe3 cS 7.lLlxe4 dS 8.ti:lg3 h5 9.d4 h4 10.tLle2 i.d6 27.lLle7+ be7 28.be7 'tYf4 11.ti:lg1 lLlf6 12.ti:lf3 tZle4 13.~e2 " 2U[d4 , tZlxb3+ 30.wd1 'iVxd4+ lZJd7 14.h3tZldf6 15.0-0 'lYe7 16.c4 3U!fxd4 lLlxd4 32 ..hfS tZlxf3 33.gxf3 :txb2 0-1 gS. .. ~7.tZle5 be5 18.dxe5 · 'il'xe5
31
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Other Minor Lines after 2.tL.f3 Among the alternative minor lines for Black after 2.0,f3, we can cite defences which are passive, such as 2 ...Wie7, or those which are quite clearly unsound, such as 2 .. j6.
This last move was the subject of analysis by Damiano in the 16th century. A brief examination of this move, apart from being of historical interest, is instructive for learning some typical tactical motifs in the opening: 3.lLlxeS! 'Wie7! (3 .. jxe5? 4.Wih5+ g6 5.'tWxe5+ followed by 6.W1xh8 wins a decisive material advantage. The attempt to not lose the h8-rook with 4 .. .'~e7? is wen worse: 5.'i!¥xe5+ ~f7 6. ~c4+ d5 7.~xd5+ ~g6 8.h4 - threatening to push this pawn furth er, with checkmate - 8... h5 9.~xb7! gives White a decisive material advantage on account of the fact that 9... .2I.xb7 allows 10.Wij5+ ~h6 11.d4+, which is winning) 4.0,/3 ~xe4+ 5. 2ie2 and after 6.0-0, White will gain
several tempi for his development and for an attack along the e-file with lle l and/ or 0,c3.
32
Elephant Gambit Of the minor variations, the so-called 'Elephant Gambit' is the most popular, and it has a Significant number of enthusiastic adherents, espeCially at club level. 2 .... d5
As a surprise weapon it may prove to be effective, but after the correct 3. e4xd5 e5-e4 4. 'ii'd1-e2! it is extremely unlikely that Black will gain sufficient compensation for the pawn.
Lmda,Konstaiith:i u.
Vogiatzis,Dimi~os
<:"7" '~r:
. Bad Wiessee 2UOR (1)
' 1.e4 e5 2.tl lf3 d5 3.exd5 A dS 4.d4 e4 5ille5 tiJe7 S.tiJc3 JLb4 7.A b5+ cS 8.dxcS bxcS 9..tc4 0-0 10.0-0 ~f5 11.~g5 'iVdS 12..be7 1!Vxe7 ;,13.13 e3 14.Ue1 'iVg5 15.Wie2 c5 ;1S.a3 cxd4 17.axb4 $..e6 18.~xe6 fxeS 19.0,c4 dxc3 20.bxc3 1-0
Philidor Defence
Philidor Defence 1.E:2-e4 e7-e5 2.-L91-f3 d7-d6
.' "t
the following line is virtually forced: 5.0-0 iLe7 6.dxe5! dxe5 7.tZlg5! iLxg5 8 .~h5 g6 9.VJlixg5 VJlixg5 1 0 .~xg5 with a superior endgame for White.
The Philidor Defence is named in honour of the famous 18th century chess theoretician-composer, who advocated this defence, albeit with the idea of pushing the pawn to f5 as early as the third move; a concept which today is viewed with great suspicion. Philidor's aggressive approach could have some validity after the moves 3.tZlc3 or 3. ~c4, which is the very reason that Morphy's favourite move 3.d4! is so appropriate. The modern treatment of this defence tends towards a more solid approach, with Black developing his pieces on the back ranks, usually .. .tZlbd7, ... tZlgf6, ...iLe7, ... c6, ... VJlic7. 2 ... d6 has the obvious defect of blocking the f8-bishop. Nonetheless, such a natural move could not be considered bad ... or, more precisely: not really bad! 3. d2-d4 Here it is worth mentioning the old Hanham Variation 3... tt:ld7, which is not often played nowadays. After 4.~c4 c6!
However, the best response is without doubt tZlgS-fS! 3. tDbS-d7 4. tDb1-c3
5.
~f1-c4
S. 0-0 7. ~f1-e1 S. a2-a4
~fS-e7
0-0 c7-cS
Black's solid but passive position is reminiscent of several Pirc variations and the Old Indian Defence. White has to content himself with a small advantage that may arise from his possession of the d-file and the weakness of the d6-square. It is for this reason that White should strive to exchange on e5. 33
Chess Opening Ess entials - Volume 1 ~
As this grants mobility to the e7 -bishop, the exchange should take place at the most opportune moment. More rarely, White succeeds in the course of the game in preparing the pawn advance £'2-£4, with the idea of undermining Black's centre. Black, for his part, has to playa waiting game - putting his faith in the solidity of his position. The following sequence has become an increasingly popular way of reaching this position: l.e4 d6 2.d4 ttJf6 3.ttJc3 e5!? (with 3.. .g6 we land in the Pirc) 4. ttJf3 (exchanging queens does not give White any particular advantage) 4 .. .tLl bd7 5.iLc4 .\te7, etc. In conclusion, this is a defence that is in the process of being re-evaluated. It is certainly not as bad as has been thought in the past. It is suitable for solid, patient players, and it has the advantage of not requiring a lot of theoretical study.
Rodziriski Alekhine,Alexander Paris 1913
1.e2-e4 e7-e5 2.ttJg1-f3 d7-dS 3.~f1-c4 tLlbB-c6 . 4.c2-c3 iLc8-g4 5.'ifd1-b3 'li'd8-d7 S.lDf3-g5?1 [6.'frxb7; 6.b fl+ 'frxfl 7."x·b7 <Ji>d7 8.•xa8 " ..bf3 ' 9,gxf3 'i'xf3=] ·S_.ttJgS-hS . 7~c4xf7+? [7 .'ifxb7] ,7...lDhSxf7 S.ttJg5xf7 'iWd7xf7? [8... ~e6-+ J 9.'iWb3xb7 ,· <,i;>e8-d7 , 10.'i!t'b7xaS'iWf7-c411.f2-f3 Ag4xf3 12.g2xf3 ttJcS-d4 13.d2-d3? [13.cxd4=] 13...\lVc4xd3 14.c3xd4 ~fS-e715:1!YaSxhS ~e7-h4X ',' 0-1 34
.~.
~I1CO:'
.......
Kaufmann,Arthur Marco.Georg
~,..
,~.
•.••{
!'i
Trebic 19i 5
,1.e2-e4 e7-eS 2.ttJg1-f3 d7-dS ·3.d2·d4 ·ttJb8·d7 4.~f1·c4 c7-c6 5.0-0 , ~e7 S.dxe5 dxe5 [6 ... ttJxeS ' 7.ttJxeS dxeS 8.'iVhS±] 7:~e2 (7 .ttJg5! ' '.i,xgS 8.'ii'h5 g6 9.'ifxg5;J;] 7...lDgfS , ; S.~d1 'iWc7?! , [8 ... 1Wa5 9.lDgS 0-0 /):, 1o.iLxfl + llxfl 11.'ii'c4'lDd5] 9.lLlg51 · ,l:tfS [9. :.0-0 10..Lf7+ Ihf7 11.'ii'c4+-] 10..bf7+1 J:txf71Ui'c4! ~fS 12.lDe6 ·. 'fibS 13.ttJxg7+'.tdS ; 14.lDeS+ , ~e8 . 15.ii.e3 1i'b4 ,1S.ttJc7+ · <,i;>dS ',nlhb4 ;~xb4 : 1S.lDxaS b6 19.13 Ac5 20..bc5 ' ;bxc5 21.l::td31 St.b7 22.~a3 ~cS · [22 ....La8 23J:1xa7 ~e7 24.ttJa3+· 23.l:xa 7 >PbS 24.l:ta5 .baS 25.lDd2 ,. f2 lLldS 32.lDxdS <,i;>xdS ;33.lld3+ rJ;;c7 34.g3 c4 35.~c3 ~aS 3S.f4 'it>dS 37.l:ta3 lDc5 [37 ... .abS . ; 38J:la8] 3S.We3 h5 39.n a5 iLb5 · 40.b3 lLld7 41.a4 .cxb3 42.cxb3 ~f1 43.:%8S ~g2 44.~e8 ~xe4 45.fxe5+ ' <,i;>d54S.a5 1-0
r
Peng'Xiaomin DuShan '" . Xiapu 2005 (19)
1.e2-e4 e7-e5 2.lLlg1-f3 d7-dS 3.d2-d4 lDba·d7?1 4~f1-c4 c7-c6 ' 5.0-0 hS? S.dxe5 dxe5 7..txf7+1 '.txf7 S.lDxe5+ Wf6 9....d4 ", .,peS 10.ttJgS bS 11.lLlxhS 'iVfS 12.1t'xf6+ 'It>xfS 13.b3 ~dS 14..tb2+ .te5 · 15.heS+ lDxeS 1S.f4 lDg4 17.e5+ . WeS 1S.lDc3 lDe3 19.1:.13 ttJxc2 : 20.l:td1 lLle7 21.~dS+ ~f5 22.lDe2 c523.h3 .. ,., , 1-0 '
Philidor Defence ~
~
Castaldi,Vincenzo ;, Tartakower,Savielly Stockholm'ol 1937 (2)
,
1.e4 e5 ' 2.tbf3 dS 3.d4 lbfS, 4.lbc3 :/pbd7 5.~e2 ~e7 S.O-O hS 7.b3 cS ' ,S.ii.b2 'fIkc7 - 9.'lWd2 g51? 10.J:tfd1 ;'ttJfS? 11.dxe5 dxe5 1Voxe5!1 ~eS , [l2... ~xe5 J3,lbdS!!] 13.lbb51! ~bS ' 14.~aSI ~dS 1SJ:txdS+1 i't'xd8 1S.tt:lc7+ *e717.~a3+ , 1-0
RabinoVich.Ilya . Ilyin Zhenevsky,Alexander \ '. Soviet Union 1922
1.e2-e4 e7-eS . 2.lbg1-f3 d7-dS 3.d2-d4 lbgS-fS 4.tbb1-c3 lbb8-d7 S.~f1-c4 ~fS·e7 ., S:i.c4xf7+? ; We8xf7 , 7.lbf3-gS+ :. Wf7-g81 , 8.lbg5-eS . ~dS-eS '. 9.tbeSxc7 'tWeS-g6 10.lbc7xa8 '. 'ilYg6xg2 , 11.lIh1-f1 . eSxd41 12.~d1-e2 [12,'ikxci4 lbes 13.f4'lbfg4- threatening 14... ~4+] 12..•d4xc31 [! 2:..tileS ' 13.f4!] 13.'iVe2--c4+ dS-dS ' 14:*Vc4xca+ wga-f7ll!l 1S.'Wcaxb7 [lS.'i!Yxh8 'tWxe4+ ' 16.wdl . 'iYf3+ I7.Wel cxb2 ' 18.Lb2 .itb4+ 19.c3 ',.'"
..... ;... ' .,.
~'!I<'t-
0,".
'.~
b c3+ 20 ..L:c3 'iWxc3+ ' 21 ,..t>e2 ~c2+ 22.Wel (22.~f3 'iYe4+' 23. ~g3 ~g4X) 22. .. lbe4 : 23 .J:ldl lbc3-+] 1S...'iWg2xe4+ ' 16.~c1-e3 .:tha-ba 17.'i:fb7xa7 c3xb2 , 1a.We1-d2 [! 8.l'Ibl " 'iVxc2-+] 1a••.~e4-b4+ 19.c2-c3 lbfS-e4+ ' 20.~d2-e2 lbe4xc3+ 21.~e2-f3 'fi'b4-e4+ 22.~3-g3 '. 4:lc3-e2+ '., 23.~g3-h3 ~e4-f3X
,,:.,,0-1
,Yu Shaoteng
Bauer,Christian Paris tt 2006 (3)
1.e2-e4 d7-d6 2.d2-d4 tilga-fS 3.lbb1-c3 e7-e5 4.lbg1-f3 lbbS-d7 S.~f1·c4 ..tfS-e7 6.0-0 0-0 7.a4 c6 S...b 2 as 9:~te2 exd410.lbxd4lbcS 11Jld1 '~ bS 12.h3 ~eS 13.lbxeS fxeS " 14.eS 4:ldS 1S.exdS .bdS 1S.lbxd5 exdS 17.c4 J:taeS 1a..ie3 .1i.f4 19..1i.xcS 'i:YxcS 20.'Wd3 d4 21.g3 .!te3 22 J:If 1 J:[xf2 23.l'Ixf2 -bf2+ 24.~xf2 l:te3 2S:*'f1 ~eS 26.c5+ w ha 27.Wg1 J:[xg3+ 2S.wh1 'iWe4+ 29.c.t>h2 :f3' 30.fYe1 .Ile3 31.1Yf1 J:le2+32.wg3 !e~+., . 0-1
35
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
PetroH Defence 1.e2-e4 c7-c5 2.~g1-f3lLlg8-f6
With 2 ...4Jf6, Black does not defend the e5-pawn, but attacks the e4-pawn instead. We are therefore talking about a defence which is conceptually ambitious and active. However, in practice, the resulting variations tend to lead to symmetrical and quiet positions, and the number of drawn games is unusually high. If Black is looking for a win, other defences would be more suitable. On the other hand, it could be an excellent choice if you are black against a stronger player, or one who plays ambitiously: indeed, if White plays too aggressively he may find that the more tactical variations will backfire on him. The Petroff Defence is OIle of the most extraordinary examples of opening reevaluation of all time: you only need to consult a 197 Os opening book to realize how little it was appreciated then. The prospect of playing symmetrical positions with one or two tempi less was 36
sufficient for it to be considered unplayable. Only the Italo-Hungarian Bela Toth played it in those years, after which it began to appear in the repertoires ofYusupov, Karpov, Hort, Hubner and other champions. From the beginning of the 1990s the Petroff Defence has been appreciated as one of the most effective means of drawing with the black pieces - especially by top-level players. The Petroff is often called the Russian Defence. Alexander Petroff, who popularized it at the beginning of the 19th century, and Carl Jaenisch, who also contributed a great deal to its development, were both Russians. At the beginning of the 20th century the American Frank Marshall believed in the validity of several lines where Black plays very aggressively. Other very dynamiC players, such as Harry Nelson Pillsbury, have also used the Petroff Defence with success. This makes you reflect on the common notion that certain openings are always solid and passive by nature, whereas others are always dynamiC and aggressive. Fortunately, the possibility of personal interpretation in so many openings is so great that there is always room for creative play. Now we will have a close look at some speCific variations. After the defence of the e4-pawn with 3 .4Jc3, there is 3 ... 4Jc6, and you transpose to the innocuous Four Knights Opening. For this reason, if White wishes to travel along more promising paths, there remain effectively two alternatives: either to take the pawn on e5 or to look for activity with 3.d4.
Petroff Defen ce A)
3. tDf3xeS
were on f6 we would be in the Exchange Variation of the French, which is notorious for leading to an easy draw. Black has three continuations : A1)
3. ...
6 ....
tDbS-c6
7. 0-0
~cS-g4
d7-d6
Not 3 .. .tDxe4? 4.Wte2 tDf6 (4 ... dS S.d3) S.tDc6+.
4. tDeS-f3 The move 4.tLlxf7!? looks like the work of a drunken Irishman. Yet it is a part of chess theory and is even dignified with a name: the Cochrane Gambit. However, against correct play White will have his work set out for him trying to find sufficient compensation for the sacrificed piece. 4. ... tDf6xe4 5. d2-d4! After S.~e2 V/iie7 6.d3 tDf6 7. ~gS ~xe2+, even with the two extra tempi the position is too sterile to offer White a concrete advantage. 5.tDc3!? is interesting, as after S ... tDxc3 6.dxc3!, White's objective is quick development with 7~ e3 or 7~ f4, 8. ~d2 and 9.0-0-0 . 5. ... d6-dS 6. ~f1-d3 In this almost symmetrical position White must exploit the presence of the black knight on e4, which appears to be actively placed, but which in reality renders Black's centre somewhat unstable. It is worth noting that if the knight
S. c2-c4! tDe4-f6 9. tDb1-c3!? ~g4xf3 tDc6xd4 10. 'ilt'd1xf3 11. 'iWf3- h3 with good compensation for White. A2)
6 ....
~fS-d6
7. 0-0 0-0 S. c2-c4 c7-c6 is the m ost logical. Now the critical line appears to be 9.cxdS cxd5 10 .4Jc3, and Black can no longer maintain the knight one4. 37
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 After 10 ... tLlxc3 1l.bxc3 ~g4 12.l:!.b 1 White has an unpleasant initiative.
A3)
6 ....
~fS-e7
Here the bishop is more passively placed. However, the dS-pawn is defended by the queen, and Black does not have to move his pawn to c6 when White plays c4. After 7.0-0 tLlc6 8.c4 - with 8.l::ie 1 jLg4!?, the position becomes complex; especially after 9.c3 fS - 8 ... tLlf6, or 8 .. .tLlb4, you reach typical Petroff Defence positions, in which White's nice centre is compensated for by Black's active piece play. B)
3. d2-d4
The most direct move. This was considered the best response in the 1970s, but 38
now it is less common than the previously examined alternative. 3. ... tDf6xe4! Inadvisable is 3... exd4 4.e5 tLle4 5.'lWxd4!, which leads to a position that is considered to be difficul t for Black. 4. ~f1-d3 d7-dS The incredible 4 ... tLlc6!? (invented by Yaacov Murey) is also playable. After 4.~xe4 dS and S ... e4 Black will regain the sacrificed piece. S. tDf3xeS
you have a symmetrical position where White will have difficulty gaining any advantage from his extra tempo after either 5 ... tDd7, or the more complex S. ... ~fS-d6 6. 0-0 0-0 g d6xeS! 7. c2-c4 tDbS-c6 S. d4xeS 9. c4xdS 'iYdSxdS tDc6-b4 10. ~d1-c2 11. ~ d3xe4 tDb4xc2 12. g e4xdS g cS-fS! g f5xg4 13. g2-g4! 14. ~ dS-e4 14.jLf4 tLlxal lS. jLe4 fS!, and again the position is balanced. 14.... tDc2xa1 1S. tDb1-c3 ~g4-h3 16 . .§.f1-e1 f7-fSI
Petroff Defence
J. "'.: '1 '11
J.~ i
1' 1
White will receive two minor pieces for a rook and a pawn, and yet in the many games with this line, White has not been able to demonstrate any substantial advantage.
"
the alternatives are no better; 17 ... nae8? 18 ..igS!!+-; 17 .. .f4 18.11e6! 'iYd8' . 19.1Llxb7 'lWgS 20.~fJ!) 18.<.hf2 'iVh2 19..bc6 bxcS ' 20.'/Wxc6 f4 21.~xdS+ . WhS 22.'iVxhS f3 23J~Yxf3 l::txf3+ ' 24.wxf3 .1:IfS+' '2S.We2 "ilVxg2+ 2S.wd3 "ilVxh3+ '27.'i1tc21 [27 ..te3 1:1.£'2] 27..:t'ig2+ 2S..td2 lIfg6+ 29.l:I.e4! hS 30.u'e1 ' :nes , 31.Wc1 l:1xe4 32.lLlxe4 h4 "33.tbgS 'i!VhS 34.1:I.e3 ~gS 3S.c4 1-0
Kavalek,Lubosh " Toth,Bela . 'Haifa 011976 (4)
"
:. 1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3 lLlt6 3.lLlxeS d6 4.lLlf3 '''; Karpov,Anatoly '" '''.' , """"" tbxe4 S.d4 dS S..td3 ~e7 7.0-0 lZlc6 , ,• S.J:!.e1 ~g4 9.c4lLlfG 10.cxdS ~xd5 , Kortchnoi, Viktor , Moscowm 1974 (6) 11;lLlc3 ~xf3 12.lLlxdS .bd1 (1.e4 e5 2.lilf3lLlf6 3:lLlxe5 d6 4.~f3 13.lZlxc7+ 'i1td7 14~f4 Jtg4 1S.dS ' lLlxe4 5.d4 dS 6.~d3 ~e7 7.0-0 lZlc6 lLld4 1S.lLlxaS J:!.xaS 17..teS ~f5 ' S.1:I.e1 ~g4 9.e3 fS 10.~b30-0 1S.~f1 lLlc2 19.~b5+ ~dS 20.d6 11.lLlbd2'it>hS 12.h3 ~S 13.~xb7 '· lLlxe1 21.l:1xe1 ~e6 22.dxe7+ Wxe7 IU6 14.~b3l:1g6 1S.~e2 Ji.h4 . 23.~d4 b6 24.a4 g6 2S.aS bxaS , 2S.l:ta1 as 27.i.e2l:tdS 2S.£c3lLldS : 1611f1 .bf3 17/ilxf3 Ji.xf2+ 1S.nxf2 lLlxf2 19.wxf2 ~d6 20.lLlgSIl.fS 29..ad4 lLlb4 30.i.c5+ weS 31.i.d1 21.\'i'a3 ~d8 22.~f4 h6 23.lLlf3 J:!.eS lld2 32 ..ta4+ .td7 33.ne1 + ~dS 24.~d3 J:re4 2S.g3 J:rfG 26.'i!VeS gS 34.~bS+ Wc8 3SJ:tc1+ wb7 27.lLlxgS , hxg5 2S..bgS J::.ee6 3S ..txd7 wxbS 37..teS fS 3S.b3 29.J:te1 'iWgS 30.h4 ng6 31.11xe6 1-0 1.tc2 39.l::td1 lLld3 40.14 Ilc1 41.l:I.xc1 , y lLlxc1 42.j.t7 lLle2+ 43.wf2 lLlxf4 Anand, Viswanathan 44.£c4 wcS 4S.il.gS h6 4S.Ji.f7 wd4 Kramnik, Vladimir 47.'it>g3 lLle2+ 4S.Wg4 lLlc1 49.h4 :.. Tilburg 1998 (2) fS+ SO.M3 gS S1.hxgS hxgS S2.£e6 wc3 ' 0-1 :1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3 lLlf6 3.lLlxeS d6 4.lLlf3 'lLlxe4 S.d4 d5 S.~d3lLle6 7.0-0 };.,e7 S.lle1 ~g4 9.e3 fS 10.'i!Vb3 0-0 Kasparov,Garry . Karpov,Anatoly 11.lLlbd2 lLlaS 12.~a4 lLle6 13.lLb5 lLlxd2 14.lLlxd2 \'i'd6 1S.h3! [before Moscow Wch m 1985 (48) this suggestion by Ubilava 15 : lLlb3 waS 1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3lLlf6 3.lLlxeS d6 4.lLlf3 pl~yed immediately) 1S...~hS 16.lLlb3 lZlxe4 5.d4 d5 6.i.d3lLlc6 7.0-0 i.e7 .ih417.lLleS ~xf2+? {insufficient, but 8.c4 <£lf6 9.lLlc3 0-0 10.h3 dxc4 !' .
39
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 ... ,. Leko,Peter 11 ..bc4 f3 b4 25.~xa7 cS 2S:~xb7 .bd4 27.1:1a2 45.axb4 axb4 46.'itJe4 nb5 47.11b3 c4 2B.J:1e2l:tedB 29.a4?1 c3 30Ji'e4 l:tbS 48.~dS WiS 49.~cS l:te8 . . .ib61 31.'tIVc2 gS 32.'fIb3 lldS! SO.l:.xb4 J:1e3 S1.h4 l:.h3 S2.hS l:th4 . 33.l:tc2 .iaS 34.g4 J:'td2 35:J.>g2 S3.f5 llh1 54.~d5 lld1 + 55.J:id4 l:tcdB 3S.n xc3 ~xc3 37.'fk'xc3 U2d5 Ue1 SS.'itJdS n e8 S7.<.td7l:tg8 S8.hS 38.'iVcS n as 39.<.tg3 J:!.da8 40.h4 J:!.SaS 4UlYc1 1:.a5 42.'iYh6 llxa4 'litf7 S9.J:1c4 wfS SO.l:te4 ~f7 S1.<.tdS 'litfS 62J!e6+ Wf7 S3.l:te7+ M6 43.h5 114a5 44.'f:ff4?? 9S! 45:~'fS S4 J~g7 l:tdS+ SS.<.tcS J:1dS+ SS.<.tc4 hS!-+ 4S.f3 l:t5aS 47.'MVc3 l:ta4 Ud4+ S7.'~c3 " 1-0 48.'ficS ll8aS ' 49:We8+ c;t>g7 50:i~'b5 J:i4aS 51:ti'b4 n dS 52:i!t'b3 Anand,Viswanathan l:tadS 53.Yi'c4 J:!.d3 S4.<.tf211a3 Kramnik, Vladimir SS.'f.Vc5 l%a2+ 5S.Wg3 ras 57:~b4 Frankfurt rapid 1999 (7) :aaaS 58.~g2 llf4 59:*'b2.+ J:!.afS 1.e4 eS 2.fS ., 0~1 • B.c4 4.:ib4 ' 9.cxd5 d8 (18 ... \i'xf.3 19.c6+ 'litd8 20.'ifd4+ c;t>e8 21.11e1+ <J;>f8
Petroff Defence ,
..
24.l::.he1 ~hS 2S.f6 -ltdS 26 ...igS l:td4 27.fxg7+~xg7 2S..tf6+ ~gS 29.'iYh4l%xd1+ 30.tiJxd1 " 1-0
, Kasparov.Garry Anand. Viswanathan Linares 1991(11)
1.e4 eS 2.tiJf3 tLlf6 3.d4 tiJxe4 4.~d3 dS S.tiJxeS Ad6 6.0-00-0 7.c4 .txeS Smyslov.Vasily" S.dxeS tiJc6 9.cxdS ~xdS 10.'ti'c2 tiJb4 11 ..be4 tLlxc2 12•.txdS .ifS Lilienthal.Andor r: 13.g4 .bg414..ie4 tLlxa11S ..tf4 fS Lep.ingrad/Moscow ch-URS 1941 (2) 1:e4 eS 2.tiJf3 tiJf6 3.d4 tiJxe4 4.~d3 ·· 16..tdS+ [16 ..Lb7 tiJc2 17.f3 .thS 18:.tdS+ ~h8 19.$.xa·8 t:.xa8 20.l:I.dl dS S.tiJxeS .td6 6.tiJc3 tiJxc3 7.bxc3 cS!oo}16 ... ~hS 17.11c1 c6 18...tg2 'iWh4 S.O-O 0-0 9J.:te1 tiJd7 10.g3 :'tWh3 11 ~f1 'iYfS ' 12.~d3 'ili'h3 , rUdS19.tLld2 [19.f3 ~hS 20.tiJa3 J:!.d4 13..tf1 ~fS 14.tiJg4 · tiJb6 1S.tiJe3 21.~e3 l::.b4 n .tiJc4l::.a423.tLla3 V2-V2 'ilff6 ·16...td3 .te6 17.tiJg4 'WdS saX-YUsupov. ; Thessaloniki 01 1988] 19... l:txd2 20..bd2 J:Id8 21 ..ic3 1S.tiJeS cS 19.'ilYhS fS 20.tiJf3 'iWeS I;Id1 + 22.%Ixd1 Axd1 23.f4? 21.~h4 ~g6 22.dxcS ~xcS 23.~e3 [23 .Afl! gives White a clear advantage ~xe3 24.l:!.xe3 tiJc4 2S.J:te2 tiJd6 26.'tWb4 tiJe4 27.tiJd4 ~d7 2S.13 according to Rozentalis] 23 ...tiJc2 24.~f2 ~9S 2S.a4 as!= ,26 ..b aS tiJd6 29.'1WcS ~hS 30.~xdS .llad8 31.tt:Je6 Axe6' 32.l:I.xe6 ~f7 33.1YeS tLld4 27..tf1 .ib3 [draw in prevision of lUeS 34.l%xe8+ 'ii'xeS 3SJte1 'iWc6 28.~e3 tLle6 29 ..tb6 ~xa4 30 ...tc4 36.~g2 neS 37.'ii'xd6 1-0 wf7 31..Le6+ Wxe6 32.'it'd4=} Y2-1J2
41
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Ponziani Opening 1.e2-e4 e7-e5 2.(' gl-f3
'L b8-c63.c2 -c3
S... tLlb8 is also playable. 6.
Domenico Lorenzo Ponziani, from the Italian town of Modena, analysed various important lines in the 18th century. He was also a member of the Pope's inner circle. The c2-c3 push is logical in that it supports d2-d4. But it has two drawbacks: it leaves the e4-pawn undefended and it prevents the development of the queen's knight to c3. Black's two best responses are 3 ... tLlf6 and 3 ... dS, both of which highlight these drawbacks.
3.
A)
4. d2-d4
4. _ d5xe4 5.
5. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. 11. 12.
~dl-a4
~g5xg2
l:th1-fl .£tb5xc6+ 'iiUa4xc6+
ilcS-h3 b7xc6 'it>eS-dS! <;t>dS-e7
~c6xaS+
~g2xf1+
'it>el-dl 'it>dl-c2
:':.
.....
tb
,.,'{'. .&. " "!'~" !/'!, /'!, ,/'!,\t; ./'!,
'I:r ttJ iii.
5. d4-d5
42
ts
'I'::,
", ,;" 'i!V ,,(,
Now we have a chaotic situation, but Black probably has a satisfactory pOSition and he may even have the upper hand.
The Goring ond Scotch Gambits
The Goring and Sco tch Gambits 1.c2-c4 e7-e5 2. !"g1-f3 t; b8-c6 3.d2-d4 e5xd4
Black can prevent his adversary from castling with ~g4xf3! 8 .... 'iVd5-c4 9. ~e2xf3 with a balanced game. World Champion Jose Raul Capablanca was the first to play this way with Black.
In the standard Scotch Game, White takes on d4 with the f3-knight. If you wish to be more aggressive, you can sacrifice a pawn for quick development by playing 4.c3. or play another sacrifice option by developing the bishop with4. ~c4 .
Goring Gambit 4. c3 With the c3-square unavailable for the queen's knight, it is logical for Black to reply with the thematic advance 4. ... d7-d5 declining the pawn on offer. After 'lWd8xd5 5. e4xd5 ~c8-g4 6. c3xd4 7. ~f1-e2 ~f8-b4+ 8. ttJ b1-c3
Alternatively, Black can be more ambitious and accept the sacrifice. After 4 ... dxc3, White can continue with S .~c4 along the lines of the Danish Gambit with the advantage that Black no longer has the simplifying ... dS. Black's best option is S... d6 6.ttJxc3 ttJf6 7.'iVb3 'iVd7 8.ttJgS ttJeS 9 .~bS c6 10.f4
K £!;~ .i. i;~d • ;: l1 :. i
;s:;,
i~~'i¥ ~';~i , ~l; , ffiit~ , 1 1' ~ ;'{~
f!:i.:~ ~ ~~J · t,·
'~! ~' 'l:},' ~, :~
"41~ !'::"
~.;;
!
:~: 'iVfti
~i,~
~.
W.
!'::" 1::;': 'i{~~
;tti
..' ~,~ !'::" '.8
tr: n
with a promising position after either 1O.. .cxbS or 10 ... ttJeg4. If on the fifth move White plays 5. ttJxc3 , Black can re-enter the variation we have just looked at by playing S... d6, or he could try the more interesting 5 ... ~b4!? 43
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Scotch Gambit
l'iheS
1S.a3
i~s 16.rM3 ~b6
;17.ttJa4 ttJfS 1S.ttJeS . l:rdS 19.1:%ac1 i 4. .liLf1-c4 Black's safest option is probably to enter into a favourable variation of the 'I\vo Knights Defence with 4 ... tDf6. 4. ... .iil..fS-cS is playable. but riskier. It can be met by d4xc3 S. c2-c3!? For 5 ... tDf6! , see the Italian Game. 6. iiLc4xf7+ <;I;>e8xf7 7. ~d1-dS+ <;I;>f7-fS S. ~dSxcS+ 'i¥dS-e7 9. ~cSxc3! ~e7xe4+ 10. .iil..c1-e3
:J:!.edS 20.b4 ttJxd4+ 21 .,bd4 .!lxd4 22.n xd4 llxd4 23.n c3 .liL.xcs 24.bxcS :.td7 2S.';t;e3 lla4 26.'.td3 <;toe6 • 27.wc2 wdS 2S.wb3 lld4' 29.1:th3 ' 'r!g4 30.11hS+ ~d4 31.g3 h6 32.l:tfS · f6 33.l'U3 l:te4 34.J:!.c3 :te2 3S.nc4+ ,Wd5 36.11f4 It'xeS 37.h4 It'dS 3S.Wc3 cS 39.11f3 a6 40.1:1f5+ :te5 ,41.1:l.t4 J:!.e4 42JUS+ Wc6 43.';t;b3 ~b5 44..lld5 lld4 45 ..llf5 nd3+ ·46.Wb2 1t'c4 47.1H4+ l:td4 48Jtf3 l:td2+ 49.Wc1 l:!.d3 . 0-1
'Alekhin~,Alexander Verlinsky,Boris .. Odessa m 1918
In this line, most players would prefer to be White. In conclusion, these gambits are dangerous against an unprepared opponent. However, against correct play, not only does White not gain anything, he often has difficulty even to maintain equality.
Miles,Anthony Nunn,John Islington jr 1970 (5)
1.e4 eS 2.d4 exd4 3.c3 dS 4.exdS ~xdS S.cxd4 tDc6 6.tDf3 ~g4 7,iLe2 R.b4+ S.ltJc3 ..txt3 9...txf3 tWc4 10..bc6+ bxc6 1Ui'e2+ ~xe2+ 12..txe2 0-0-0 13.~e3 ttJe714.lIhd1 44
1.e4 eS 2.d4 exd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.ttJxc3 ttJC6 (4...~b4 5. jt,c4 (S.ltJf3 ltJc6) 5... d6? (S ... h c3+ 6.bxc3 d6 7.'i!¥b3 '¥IIe7 8.ttJe2 ttJc6 9.0-0 ttJf6 10.ttJd4 ttJxd4 Il.cxd4 0-0 LUtel h6 13 ..L3± Alekhine-Pomar . Salamanca, Madrid 1943) 6.hf7 +! 'if;>xf7 7.'¥IIb3+ ~e6 8:ii'~:b4 ltJc6 9.~a4 ttJf6 10.ttJn h6 11.0-0 :Ue8 12.1:1dl Alekhine-' Stegerhoek. Malang simul1933 1-0 (36)] 5...tc4 d6 [5 ....iil..b4!? 6.00 d6 7.'Wb3 'h c3+ 8.bxc3 'ifd7 9.'ifc2 ttJf6 10.0-0 0:0 11.h3 n e8 12.R.d3 h6' 13.11bl a6 14..tieJ ttJeS 15.ttJxeS dxe5 16.f4 ~d6 17.£5 White has not enough compensation for .. the pawn: CiOCaltea-L.Kovacs, ' Baja 1971] 6.ttJf3 ti:Jf6 7:ti'b3 fVd7 S.ttJgS ttJe5 9..tb5 c6 10.f4 cxbS 11.fxeS dxe5 12..ii1..e3 ~d6 13.ltJxbS 0-0 14.J:!.d1 ttJe8 1S.0-0 'fIIe7 16.ttJxd6 · ttJxd6 17:~'a3 J:tdS 18.tbxf7 ~g4 19Jhd6 ne8 20.~gS Wic7 2UWb3 .iil..e2 22.ttJxeS+ It'hS 23.J:!.c1 tits 24.'i¥d1 WiaS 2S.~xe2 'fIIxe5 26.l:tdS 1-0
Scotch Game
Scotch Game 1.02-c4 07-c5 2. ".Jg 1-f3 ·'L b8-c6 3.d2-d4 e5xd4 4. 'L f3xd4
there is a drawback: with the pawn on c7 instead of on e7 the f8-bishop is ready to enter the fray on c5 or on b4, exerting a pressure on White's centre that is rare in the Sicilian. This is the reason why Scotch lines often have great positional tension: if White succeeds in neutralizing Black's active piece play, he can begin to exploit his space advantage and possession of the centre. After 4.tLJxd4, Black can choose from two main lines and three minor ones. We will begin with the three minor variations: A)
The Scotch Game picked up its name after its use in a match between the Edinburgh and London Chess Clubs in 1824. This opening has had many highs and lows over the years. After its employment by Jacques Mieses and Savielly Tartakower at the beginning of the 20th century. the Scotch Game was a rarity until its successful adoption by Garry Kasparov from 1990 on. Another extraordinary example of a completely reassessed opening. Today the Scotch Game, along with the Ruy Lopez, is considered to be the only serious attempt for White to gain an advantage after l.e4 e5. In a certain sense 3.d4 is the most logical move: as in the Open Sicilian (Le. the variations with 3.d4), White obtains the classic space advantage (4 ranks versus 3) and does not have to worry about an enemy central pawn majority such as is typical of the Sicilian Defence. However,
4.
~d8-h4
Steinitz's move seeks to profit from the absence of the knight on f3 to attack the e4-pawn, which it usually wins! Therefore, in a certain sense the Scotch Game is a gambit! However, the pawn comes at too high a price, and this variation remains a rarity. The best line for White is probably 5. ttJb1-c3 ~f8-b4 6. jLf1-e2! 'iYh4xe4 7. ttJd4-b5 jLb4xc3+ 8. b2xc3 we8-d8
9. 0-0 and the lead in development, the bishop pair and the black king on d8 45
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
are more than enough compensation for the pawn. B)
4 ....
~fS-b4+
If we exclude the dubious 5. tt:lf5, White can now continue with: 01) 5. ~c1-e3 1tdS-f6l The pressure on d4 forces White to make the disagreeable move 6. c3 and after 6 ...tt:lge7 or 6.. .'1iVg6, Black has good piece play with equal possibilities for both sides. 5. tt:ld4-b3 ~c5-b6 6. a2-a4 a7-a6 7. lDb1-c3 d7-d6 S. lDc3-d5 ~b6-a7 White has a space advantage, but Black has no weaknesses and he can develop his forces smoothly. 02)
A paradoxical move that is becoming increasingly popular. After 5.tt:lc3, 5 ... tt:lf6 transposes to the 4 ... tt:lf6 variation, reducing White's options. After 5.c3, Black's bishop retreats to e7 or to c5 hoping that the move c3, which prevents tt:lc3, will prove to be to Black's advantage. It is not clear if this is the case, but at least in this way Black succeeds in avoiding many highly theoretical lines. C) 4 .... ~dS-f6 This usually transposes to Variation D3 after 5.tt:lxc6 ~c5.
0)
4 ....
46
~fS-c5
03) 5. lDd4xc6 Another move that has been completely reassessed: the old line of thinking was that after 5. ... 'iVdS-f6! threatening mate on f2, Black had a good game. Then the move 6. 1td1-d2 was discovered. Ugly, as it blocks the bishop's view from cI, but quite effective. 6. d7xc6 7. lDb1-c3
Scotch Game There is a lot of play for both sides : Black has easy development, but the doubled pawn on the c-file will give White a favourable endgame. This is a recurrent theme in open games. Practice seems to slightly favour White. E)
4 ....
S. S.
tLlb1-c3 ttJd4xcS
~cS-b4
In order to play .I1l.d3.
6.
b7xc6 d7-dS 7. ~f1-d3 cSxdS B. e4xdS 0-0 9. 0-0 10. ~c1-gS c7-cS Black does not have any serious problems, but White has play against the weakened queens ide with tLia4 and c4.
E2)
S. ttJd4xcS S. e4-eS
b7xcS
tLlfS-dS
and at this point Black can immediately retreat his knight with 8 ... tLib6, or he can pin the c4-pawn with 8 ... .I1l.a6. In both cases there is complex play with chances for both sides. This becomes clear when you consider that both White and Black can castle either short or long, and that the pawns on eS and c4 are weak but they also have the potential to stifle the opponent, who is rather lacking in space. In short, a typical position where the stronger player should win. This also holds true because opening theory has not explored all the available possibilities yet and therefore there is still room for creative play. ~":" Ponomarjov.Ruslan·'"
Godena,Michele Plovdiv Ecll-tt 2003 (4) . (1.e4 eS 2.ttJf3 tLicS " 3.d4 exd4 .4.ttJxd4 ~c5 S...te3 'itfS S.ttJb5 .be3 7.fxe3 'fWh4+ B.g3 ~dB 9.'t!t'g4 gS! [Aesthetically ugly. but ac,tually an important novelty 1O.ttJ 1c3 .dS 1HWe2 as 12.ttJd4 ttJe5 13.~g2 , ~eS 14.0-0-0 'iWd7 1S.h4 gxh4
J
The Mieses Variation. Black now plays S. ...
7. ~d1-e2 B. c2-c4
tLlgB-fS
This is the most ambitious move. Black encourages White to push the pawn to eS, hoping to then undermine the centre. If White decides not to jump to the bait, he can continue with S.tLic3, or otherwise he can exchange on c6 to facilitate the pawn advance to eS: E1)
even if it locks in his own f8 -bishop. However, White must imprison his own bishop, too.
"\lVdB-e7
47
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
16.gxh4 i.g4 17.~e2 tiJe7 1S..txg4 h f3 36/~f2 .ib7 37.a4 ' ~S 38.h4 1fVxg4 19.'/i'f2 0-0-0 20.'i!ff6 ~d7 <J;;e7 39..i.e2 l:th1 ·40.h5 WfG 41.b4 21.hSl:lhgS 22.l:lhg1 'tIi'h3 23 ..i:l.ge1 J:[c1 42.lbe3 Ibc3 43 ...ba6 :c!.xe3 J:l.deS , 24.'~'h6 ll:g2 2S.11h1 'ifg3 44..bb7l:lb3 4S.aSl'bb4 46.a6 ~a4 26.'ihh7 ~xe3+ 27.<J;;b1 )legS 0-1 , 2S.tiJfS tiJxfS 29.'fHxfS+ <J;;bS 30.h6 112g6 31.tiJdS'iWgS 32.J:!.df1 :thS ZukertortJohannes Hermann " 33.h7 c6 34.tiJf6 'ltxf5 35Jbf5 wc7 Schallopp,Emil 36.b3 wdS 37.tiJgS 1:g7 3S.J:ld1 Leipzig 1877 (10) J:[gxh7 39.J:bd6+ ~c740.:etd2 :c!.xgS 1.e4 e5 .. 2.tiJf3 !iJc6 3.d4 exd4 41.J:[xeS f6 42.1:tf5 l:teS 43.:f4 l:rhe7 4.tiJxd4 .acS S.tiJb3 ~b6 6.tiJc3 44.J:[d4 l:td7 45.c3 )leS 46.~c2 cS !iJge7 7.if..gS f6 S..tf4 tiJg6 9.~g3 d6 47.lbd7+ ~xd7 48.<j;Jd3 l:le6 10.14 fS 11..~c4 hS 12.'ifdS 'iNf6 49.'.t>e3 J:[d6 SO.1:%15 b6 51.J:[d5 we6 13.0-0-0 h4 14.e5 dxeS 15.fxeS S2.c4 I:id7 ' S3.~4 J:[h7 54..i:l.dS ' ..-gS+ 16.wb1 ':18 17.J..b5 tiJe7 1S.'fHdS+ ·· cM7 19.~c4+ ~e6 l:th4+ 5S.'iPf3 )lh3+ S6.Wg4 J:[h2 57.l:teS+ <J;>d6 5S.~f5l:tf2+ 59.<J;>g6 20..be6+ wxe6 2HWd7+ <J;>f7 l:txa2 60.wf7 bS 61.l:le6+ <J;;d7 22.e6+ wgS ,' 23 ..bc7 l:tadS S2.<.t;>xf6 llf2+ S3.~e5 l:lb2 '" 24.J..xdS< l:lxdS 2S.fVxb7 'iYxg2 ,S4.11d6+
Vidmar,Milan Sr San Remo 1930 (13)
" Ponomariov,Ruslan Grischuk,Alexander . Lausanne 2000 (3)
' ,
1.e4 eS 2.tiJf3 tiJc6 3.d4 exd4 4.tiJxd4 ~cS S.ii.e3 'iWfS S.c3 tiJge7 7..tc4 b6 S.O-O .tb7 9.tiJb3 !iJeS 10.tiJxc5 bxcS 11.~e2 be412.13 ~b713J1LxcS 0-0 14,tbd2 dS 15...1i.d4 tiJdS 16.93 "'g6 17.<J;;h1 tiJg4 1S.tiJc4 ~h6 19..ig1 l:taeS 20.'iWc2 fS 21 ..iLd3 f4 22.'fi'd2 tiJ~3 23.gxf4 · tiJxf1 24.l:txf1 :etxf4 2S.'fig2 J:[e1 26.tiJd2 :etxf1 27..txf1 :etfS 2S.1IVe2 tiJeS 29..ig2 a6 30Ji.d4 "f4 31beS ft'xe5 32:ibeS dxeS 33.'iitg1 1:tdS 34.tiJc4 .i:!.d1 + 3S.ii.f1 48
1.e4 eS 2.tiJf3 tiJcS 3.!iJc3 tiJf6 4.d4 . exd4 5.tiJxd4 ~b4 6.tiJxc6 ., bxc6, 7i d3 d5 , S.exdS 1We7+ " 9.'iYe2 't'k'xe2+ 10.~xe2 cxdS 11.~d20·0 12.0-0-0 c6 13.f3 ~e6 14.a3 ~d6 1S..ia6 .i.cs 16••bcS :etfxc8 17..i:!.de1 tiJd7 1S.tiJe2 tiJb619.fbf4 tiJc4 20.tiJd3 nabS 21.~c3 cS 22.tiJeS .beS 23.~xeS l:lb7 24.b3 tiJxa3 25.~b2 tiJb5 26J~eS . d4 27.I:ihe1 f6 2S.11eS+ J:[xeS' 29.11xeS+"'1t>f7 30Jlc8 11c7 31.J:[bS' tiJd6 32.b4 cxb4 33 .•bd4 as 34..tb6 )lb7 3SJbb7+ tiJxb7 36.<J;>b2 a4 37.c3 tiJd6 . 0-1 i
Four Knights Opening
Four Knights Opening 1.e2-c4 c7-c5 2.~ g1-f3 'Lb8-c6 3. ~b1-c3 ~g8-f6
If White decides on 4.d4, then after 4 ... exd4 you transpose to an innocuous variation of the Scotch Game that we have discussed in the previous chapter. If Black is not pleased by the prospect of playing the somewhat sterile positions that ensue, he can try 4 ... ~b4, but after 5. ttJxe5, the resulting complications seem to favour White. It is worth mentioning the minor variation 4.g3. However, by far the most frequent continuation is:
4. k f1-bS
The Four Knights Opening is one of White's most solid set-ups against 1...e5, and it was very widely played at the beginning of the 20th century. Then it all but disappeared until the 1980s and '90s, when it made a hesitant comeback, its chief use being to avoid highly theoretical lines. Black has few problems achieving equality if White plays 4.~b5 (sometimes called the Spanish Four Knights Game) or 4.d4, which is in the spirit of the Scotch Game. That fact that Black has few problems is not surprising, as practice has taught us that if White wishes to gain a significant advantage in dIe open games he must usually occupy the centre with pawns. However, this is rarely possible without the support of the c3-pawn: in this context the move ttJc3, made purely as a developing move, is too mechanical to offer concrete prospects.
Now, unlike in the RUy Lopez, the e4-pawn is defended, and therefore the threat 5.~xc6 and 6.tt:lxe5 is real. Black can respond in two completely different ways. A) kf8-b4 4 .... is a solid continuation that indirectly defends e5 by attacking e4. 0-0 S. 0-0 5 ... d6? allows 6.ttJd5J. 6. d2-d3 d7-d6
7. k c1-gS Now threatening ttJd5, and Black cannot go on copying White's moves. Therefore: kb4xc3! 7.
8. b2xc3
~d8-e7!
49
Chess Openin8 Essentials - Volume opening. However, in this case the attack is specifically aimed at bS and, above all, the presence of the knight on c3 renders a capture on d4 unwise. Moreover, it prevents the pawn push c2-c3. This gives Black resources that are not present, for example, in the Bird Defence of the RUy Lopez (3 .. .ttJd 4), a borderline variation in terms of playability. S. ~ bS-a4 Probably best. It maintains the pin on the d7-pawn and reduces the impact of Black's counterplay with .. .c6 and ...dS. Now Black usually makes a positional sacrifice of a pawn in one of two ways:
with the idea of ... ttJd8 -e6 to lift the pin by the gS-bishop. 9. l:l.f1-e1 tZlc6-dS tZldS-e6 10. d3-d4 11. ~ gS-c1 With the possibility of repositioning the bishop on a3. Now we reach a strategically complex position in which White has good control of the centre and the bishop pair, while Black has a solid position with good endgame prospects.
B1) c7-c6 S .... Enabling .. .d6. d7-d6 6. tZlf3xeS 7. tZleS-f3 ~cS-g4 with compensation, or, more violently:
B)
B2)
4.
tZlc6-d4
S.
~fS-cS
0-0 6. tZlf3xeS 7. tZleS-d3 Here one of the disadvantages of ... ~cS is revealed; White now gains a tempo with this move. 7. ... ~cS-b6 At the moment Black threatens 8 ... dS. S. e4-eS tZlf6-eS
Rubinstein's move (who was usually a very solid player!) is appropriate if Black wants to unbalance the position. It would appear that this move contravenes the general principles of opening theory, which always advise against moving the same piece twice in the 50
Four Knights Opening
White's kingside is a little exposed and White now plans to protect it with 9. tt'le3-dS! and then tt'le3, keeping the extra pawn. d7-dS! 9. ... Opening the game and putting his trust in his superior development, his control of the e-file and White's weakly-defended king. The position after lO .ttJe3 is difficult to evaluate, even if the results are slightly in White's favour.
we have had it drummed into us that we musm't place our bishop in front of a centre pawn, as only the advance of these pawns allows us to develop freely. We are not suggesting for a moment that such general strategic guidelines are no longer valid. It is just that they should never again be viewed as the Word of God.
Rublevsky,Sergey ." ; Mamedyarov,Shakhriyar '
i"
As a testimony to the vitality of the chess game, it is worth mentioning Black's final alternative. A move which began to become popular, even at higher levels, at the beginning of the new millennium: the 'beginner's move' 4 ... ~d6!?
Dogmatism is truly a thing of the past! From the time of our first chess lessons,
'7~
:Poros 2006"(1)
: 1.e4 e52.ttJf3 · li:leS 3.li:le3 li:lf6 .4 ...tb5 ' li:ld4 , 5 ...ta4 e6 S.ttJxe5 d5 ' 7.d3 ~dS S.f4 ~e5 9.exd5 0-0 10,llle4 ttJxe4 11.dxe4 'ilHh4+·12.g3 ' ~h3 13.~e3 'ii'g2 14.1:(g1 ~xe4 ' 15.~f2 rleS 16.'ifd3 llxe5 17.fxe5 l"Wf3+ 1S.'it>e1 j:,f5 19.11f1 i.b4+ , ,20.c3 ..txd3 21.llxf3 ttJxf3+ 22.'ittf2 f4 li:lgS+ 2S.hS 39.J:!.a1 I:I.eS 40.bxa5 ttJd3+ ' 41.wf3 tt'lxe5 42.~xd5 b4 43.aSli:lxaS 0-1
5]
Chess Opening Essentiols - Volume I
Hungarian Defence 1.e2-e4 e7-~5 2.!2. g1-f3 i!..b8-c6 3.Ji..f1-c4 ~f8-e 7
The move 3 ... ..\te7 has never been popular since it first appeared in the middle of the 19th century in a postal game between the cities of Paris and Pest. It usually leads to strategic plans typically associated with the Philidor Defence or the Steinitz Variation of the Ruy Lopez: Black has a solid position but without any real prospects. After the natural d7-d6 4. d2-d4 5. h2-h31 No pin! l2lg8-f6 5. 0-0 6. l2l b1-c3 7. 0-0 White has a little more room to breathe, even if the solidity of Black's position must not be underestimated. It is worth remembering that 3 ... d6 is playable on the 3rd move, with a likely
52
return to the Hungarian Defence after 4.d4 iie7, given that 4 ... 1ig4 is dubious because of 5 .h3 . Let's go back a little, so as to explain the idea behind the Hungarian Defence. The development of the c4-bishop on the 3rd move, even if slightly inconsistent with the previous move, was one of the primary moves in the early development of opening theory. The vulnerability of the f7 -square and related tactics have attracted and delighted players and chess scholars for centuries. Such is the brilliant quality of the playing style so closely associated with the Romantic era. But the advent of the Positional School and the realisation that Black has nothing to fear from the most violent lines, directed White's attention towards the RUy Lopez and also towards the Scotch; openings that are configured with a more correct strategic concern in mind: the control of the centre. However, 3 . ~c4 has not disappeared from practical play and it still has a charm, perhaps because of its associations with a golden past, even though by playing 3 .. .tbf6 (Two Knights) or 3 ... 1ic5, Black obtains completely playable positions with good prospects of equality. OK then. Why play the Hungarian? The answer is simple: the variations to remember if you play 3 .. .l2lf6 or 3 ... iic5 are so numerous, that there are many who prefer a quiet position which is slightly inferior to the risks associated with the more violent alternatives.
Evans Gambit
Evans Gambit 1.c2-c4 o7-c5 2. !j,gl -f3 ..r: b8-c6 3.:.i..fl-c4 ':;;"f8-c5 4.b2-b4
"""fe,
~•• ,," '~"'"
-;" b' ~
,'",,,. ' ...""
Invented at the beginning of the 19th century, the Evans Gambit became so immensely popular that it threatened the supremacy of the King's Gambit. It was repeatedly played, even in World Championship matches, by players of the calibre of McDonnell, De la Bourdonnais, Morphy, Anderssen, Zukertort and Chigorin. However, with the development of more sophisticated defensive techniques at the beginning of the 20th century its popularity waned rapidly. To understand why, just look at the impact made by the Lasker Defence, where Black returns the pawn in exchange for a promising endgame. As a result of this defence many a white player has lost his taste for this romantic style of play. Even if later on a method was devised to avoid the Lasker Defence, the Evans Gambit remains chiefly the property of correspondence players and is rarely seen in
grandmaster tournament games. An exception was the Italian Sergio Mariotti's victory against the strong grandmaster Svetozar Gligoric (Venice 1971). Later, in the 1990s, Kasparov, the great scholar of opening theory, won a couple of brilliant victories employing the Evans. This led to a partial rebound in the popularity of the Evans Gambit. 4. ... ~c5xb4 Black can also decline with 4 ... ii.b6 and reach an acceptable position. 5. c2-c3 To occupy the centre with d2-d4. Now the idea behind the gambit becomes clear; White wants to play an Italian Game with an extra tempo. Avoiding 5 ... ~c5, which makes d2-d4 easier, the most solid retreat was always considered to be 5 ... ll..e7, returning the pawn after 6.d4 tLla5 7.tLlxe5 tLlxc4 8.tLlxc4 d5, with equality. However, Kasparov's introduction of 7.~e2!? exd4 8.1i'xd4! has added new spice to this line. The ugly 5 ... ~d6 also seems playable. But Black's principal alternative remains 5. ... ~b4-a5 which maintains the pin on the c3-pawn. White's best continuation is to immediately push the pawn to d4, given that 6.0-0 leads to the famous Lasker Defence 6 ... d6 7.d4~b6!
53
Chess Opening Essential s - Volume 1
which is characterized by the return of the pawn with 8.dxeS dxeS 9.~xd8+ tiJxd8 I O.tiJxeS ~e 6 . In so doing, Black is left with a superior pawn structure. 6. d2-d4! Now the main line is d7-d6 6 .... 7. 'iYd1-b3! 'iYdB-d7! ~a5-b6! B. d4xe5 With the idea of ... tiJaS. 9. tiJb1-d2! In order to recapture with the knight. 9. ... tiJc6-a5 10. 'iYb3-c2 tiJa5xc4 11. tiJd2xc4 d6-d5!
:i ',a .• '" ~.i ' ~~ ' ~ iV ·· ~i ~
A
Before this novelty, the perfectly reasonable I I ... ~cS was played. 12.e4xd5 ~d7xd5 13. 'i4Vc2-a4+ ~cB-d7 14. tiJc4xb6! c7xb6 A necessary evil: both pawn structures look ugly, but the opposite-coloured bishops give both players chances. The following line has recently become popular: 6 .... e5xd4 7. 0-0 tiJgB-e7 d7-d5 B. c3xd4 9. e4xd5 tiJf6xd5 10. WlYd1-b3 ~cB-e6 54
with a complex game.
'; .' Kasparov,Garry .,. ~ Piket.Jeroen Amsterdam Euwe-mem 1995 (2)
,1.e4 e5 2.tiJf3 tiJc6 3.~c4 ~c5 4.b4 ;.tb6 5.a4 as 6.b5 tiJd4 7.tiJxd4 .bd4 · B.c3 g b6 9.d4 exd4?1 [9 ... ~~7! . ;10.0-0 (10.'ifg4 tiJf6 11.'iWxg7 1:[g8 l2,fkh6 J:!g6 OO) ,10 ... d6 (10 ... tiJf6!? , Il.llel (I L.L3 d6 l2.J:lel 0-0 ; J3.'/IlYd3 tIe8 14.tiJd2) 1 L.d6' I2.tiJa3 O~O 13 ..\tb3 ~g414.'i!Yd3 ~ 6 IS.h e6 fxe6 " 16.tiJc4;!; Grosar-Barle. Geneva . g e6!? 1996) I J.'iYd3! ' (11.f4 (11 ... tiJf6?! 12.fXeS dxeS 13 .~a3±; ;13 ..ltg5!?; ll...exd4 l2.cxd4 , tiJf6 .(I2 ... ~g4?! . 13.'iYd2 (13.'iYd3!? .\te2 , il 4.'ifxe2 h dH 15 ..ie3·~xal 16 .~dS J:[b8 17.tiJd2~) 13 ... tiJf6 14.tiJc30-0 · l1 S.Uel;!;) 13.tiJc3 ~e6:::::) I2.ct:la3 exd4 ' l3.cxM 0-0-0 14..lte2 tiJf6 lS .gf3 dS 16.eS ct:le4 17.ct:lc2 h5 1::::: Nunn-Hecht, Buenos Aires 01 1978) II...tiJf6 ·I2.tiJd2 ;· 9...d6? 10.dxeS dxeS II ..L f7++-] 10.0-0 tiJe7 11 ..tgS! [I J.g a3 d6, . 'J'a3-fS] 11 ••h6 12..be7 [12 ..§lli4 0-0 ' ' 13 .cxd4 gS 14.~g3 dS IS .exdS ct:lxdS Van der Sterren] 12...'iVxe7 13.cxd4 ~d6? (13...0-0 14.ct:lc3; 13 ... d6 ·14.tiJc3 g e6 IS.ct:ldS; 13...'tlVb4!? 14.ttJa3 0-0 . lS .Vd3 dS! 16.exdS
Evans Gambit
. .(16.$..xdS! ? 1i'xd4 17 ,~xd4 ~xd4 lsJhdl .tcS ·19.ttJ(4) lL.td7 IfttJc2 'li'd6 18.ttJe3;!; Kasparov] 14.ttJc31 b d4 [14 .. .'iWxd4 IS.ttJdS! .'ifeS! ? ( lS ... 'iYxdl 16Jlfxdl±; IS ... tWxc416.ttcl 'iVa2 17.l1xc7! he7 '; IS.ttJxc7+ ~e7 (J8...c,f;>dS 19.ttJxaS±) 19.ttJxaS '· d6 20.tWc1+- Kasparov) ' 16.ttJxb6 · (16.hl!? 0-0 17.'tWe2 d6 · lS.f4~) 16 ...cxb6 17 . ~d5 0-0 lS.1:1:cl;!;] 15.ttJd5! .ba1 1S.tWxa1 0-0 [J 6... f6 17.b6! . cxb6 18.eS (lSJXbl-+) IS ... fxeS19.%tel WdS ~; 20JXxeS±] 17.eS ~cS 1SJtc1+- [L:. ttJc7, .tf7] 18M.c6 19~a2 tWa3 · 20.ttJbS dS 21.'ttJxaS+- WhS 22.ttJbS ~eS 23.h3 l:tdS 24.bxcS ' bxc6 2S.l1c3 ~b4 2S.ttxcS n bS ' 27.ttJxd5 'eVxa4 2SJ:tc1 '{Wa3 29.:.tc4 1-0
Chigorin,Mikhail Lasker,Emanuel
,.
St Petersburg 1895 (1)
1.e4 e5 2,lbf3 ttJc6 3~c4 ~c5 4.b4 .b b4 5.c3 ~c5 S.O-o dS 7.d4 .tbS ; S.a4 :DfS 9..tb5 as 1O.~xcS+ bxcS ,11.a5 .ta7 12.dxe5 .lLixe4 13.'iWe2 .dS 14.ttJd4 ttJxc3 15.tt:lxc3 .bd4 1S.'fHd3 c5 17.~g3 ~eS 1S.~g5 'ifd719.l1a~1 fS 20.exfS gxfS 21 ..tf4 l:tgS - 22.'iYf3 0-0-0 23.l:tfe1 · c4 24.'iYe2 .afS 25.'iia2 J:[xg2+26. h1 l:xf2 0-1
Chigorin,Mikhall Pillsbury,Harry Nelson London 1899 (1)
· 1.e4 e5 2.ttJf3 ttJcS 3.$..c4 Acs 4.b4 ' .b b4 5.c3 .tc5 S.O-O dS 7.d4 .i.bS S.dxe5 dxe5 9.'tiYxd8+ ttJxd8 10.ttJxe5 Srl.eS 11.ttJd2.ttJe7.12 ..b3 ~
13.ttJd3 ttJgS 14.l:tab1 <M1 J:!e8 1S.c4 cS ' 17..i.xeS+ tDxes 18.ttJb3 rIadS 19.ttJbc1 rId7 20.c5 Y4C7 21.g3 ttJeS 22.ttJxeS+ .axe5 23.ttJ b3 gS 24.J:[fd1 J:[edS 25.l:txd7+ rIxd7 2S.h3 .i.c7 27.c,f;>f1 bS 2S..tb4 h5 29.Wg2 l1d3 30.l:tc1 ttJd4 31.l:.c3 l:txc3 32.b c3 ttJxb3 33.axb3 a5 34.<;1;>f3 ~eS 3S.we3 g4 36.hxg4 hxg4 37.'~ d3 a4 3S.bxa4 bxa4 39.Srl.b4 .te5 40.Srl.a3 Srl.a1 41.Ac1 fS 42 ~a3 weS 43.exfS Wxf5 44.~e3 We5 4S.14+ WdS 4S.fS .te5 47.~2 We4 ' 0-1 f6
1S.~d5
Kasparov,Garry Anand, Viswanathan . Riga Tal mem 1995 (4)
1.e4 eS 2.ttJf3 tDcS 3.~c4 .ac5 4.b4 .b b4 S.c3 J;.,e7 S.d4 ttJa5 7..ie2 exd4 S:~xd4 ttJf6 9.eS ttJcS 10.'iWh4 ttJd5 11.1Wg3 gS 12.0-0 ttJbS 13.c4 dS 14.l:td1 ttJd7 1S...thS ttJcxe5 1S.liJxe5 ttJxe5 17.ttJc3 f6 .1S.c5 ttJf7 19.cxdS , cxd6 -- . 20.'tWe3 ttJxhS 21.'tiYxh6 .ita 22:iWe3+ <JiI7 23.ttJd5 .teS 24.ttJf4 ~e72S.l:te1 1-0 ,
Short,Nigel Gupta,Abhijeet Mumbai 2006 (5) " '
1.e4 e5 V bf3 ttJc6 3.~c4 .ic5 4.b4 .txb4 5.c3 ..ta5 S.d4 exd4 7.li'b3 'iVt6 S.O-O b5 9..bb5 .ttJge7 10..ig5 ~g6 11..b e7 ttJxe7 12.cxd4 0-0 13.ttJa3 llbS 14:iWa4 .tc3 15.l1ac1 .ib2 1S.l1xc7 'iWd6 17.l:txc8 ttJxc8 1S.ttJc4 'fIic719.ttJxb2 ttJd6 20..,bd7 l:xb2 21.£t.cS l:tfbS 22.83 l1b1 23.g3 h6 24.e5 ttJf5 25 .~e4 l:xf1 + 26. ~xf1 ttJe7 27.dS iVc5 2S.dS ttJd5 29:ii'd4 'iYb5+ 30.~g2 ttJbS 31.ttJe1
ss
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
-..a5 32/tJd3 'iWxa3 33.tOc5 :tea 34.d7 tOxd7 35.tOxd7 'iic3 3S:iVxa7 ~d2 37.'iYb7 :td8 38.~cS 'fVc3 39.M h540~e4 'iYd241.i.d5 1-0
" [9 ... hc3 10.tlhc3 f6 (10 ... tI.:lf6 I Li.a3 d612.e5 tOe4 J3.'iVb2 tOxeS 14.tOxeS'iiVxeS IS,tlfel!+-) Il..ta3 d6 12.i.dS! .td7 13 ..trabl 0-0-0 14.tOd4+-; a little better is this sugges-' tion of Fischer ' himself: 9 ... 'ifb4! 1O .~?,f7+ 'it>dS n ...tg5+ (ll.hgS? Anderssen.Adolf Dufresne.Jean " 'iYxb3!) ll...tI.:lge7 12.tI.:ldS ~xb3 Berlin 1852 ' . J3.axb3 with an attack] 10.tI.:ld51 tI.:lxd5 1.&1 e5 2.tOf3 tLlc6 3...tc4 ~c5 4.b4 [ 10 .. :iVxe40 1 I.tOgS... with the initia.txb4 " 5.c3 A a5 6.d4 exd4 7.0-0 tive] 11.exd5 tI.:le5 [J l. ..tI.:ld8 n .Aa3 , d3?1 [avoids the creation of a central d6 13 .•b5++-] 12.tOxe5 'ifxe5 pawn duo on d4 and e4] 8.'ifb3! 'tIi'f6 , 13~b2 "'g5 14.M! 'ifxh4 [J4 .. JiYh6 9.e5 'iYgS10.J::re1 tOge711 ..b3 b5?! ' IS.'ifa3+- 6. 16.tlfe1+; J4 ... 'ii'g4· 12.1txb5 :tb8 13.'fVa4 A bS 1S.l:tfe 1+ ~xel (I L'tiidS 16.'iii'e3 : 14.tObd2 .tb715.tOe4 'iff5 1S..bd3 .iM 17.'iWh61! gxb6 JS ..tf6+Ae7 ; 'ii'h5 17.tOfS+I? (I7.tDg3! (this would ' 19.he7+ ·'it>eS 2o.Ag5+! <;f;>f8 21 ,.txh6+ 'irg7 . 22.J::re8+!! 'oPxe8' ,have won more, easily, but Anderssen plays in the romantic spirit of the time, 23.A xg7+-) 16.trxel+'it>dS 17.'tfe3 : ,and this 'encounter is rightly ,rememit'xM 18.g3!) 15hg7 J::rg8 bded as the Evergreen Game) I 7... 'iii'h6 1SJ:tfe1+<;f;>d8 [16 ... i.xel 17.trxel+] 1-0 , IS.Ac1 +-] 17'hgxf6 18.exf6 :g81 , 17.'ii'g3! (17 ... 'ifxg3. 1S .~f6X) ,19.l%ad11 [this move is indeed the work .:.. . of a genius] 19...'fVxf3? [losing:, " Lasker's 19 ... l%g4!L was better] Mariotti.Sergio 20.:txe7+! tI.:lxe71? , [20 ... ,""d8 Gligoric.Svetozar 21.trxd7+! ,""cS! (2l...'it>xd7 n :i.f5+ Venice 1971 (8) 'it>e8 B ..td7 + d824.Lc6+) ·1.e4 e5 2.tI.:lf3~cS 3 ..tc4 .fc5 4.b4 22.J::rd8+1 ;, ~dS . (22 ... tI.:lxdS ~xb4 5.<:3 .is5 , 6.d4 exd4 7.0-0 23.'iYd7+!! ,""xd7 : H.i.fS+ 'it>c6 A bS 8.cxd4dS 9.h3 tI.:lfS 10.lle1 hS' 11 .i.a3 0-0 12.tI.:lc3 l:e813Ac1 tI.:lh7' (24...WeS2S.Ad7X) - 25.i.d7X) i3·~.te2+ tI.:ld4 H ..Lfl i.ill 2,s.g3 14.lle3 tDa5 15...id3 A eS ' 1S.•e2' i.xd l 26.'ifxd1+-] 21.'ifxd7+11 tLif8 17.~a4 tOgS 18.tOxb6 axb6 'oPxd7 22 ~f5+ <;pe8 23i d7+ Wf8 19.d5' A d7 20...tb2 tOf4 2Ui'c2 cS 24 ..be7X ," 1-0 22.1Itc3 f6 23.dxcS bxcS 24 ..ilf1 <:5 25.tI.:lh4 d5 26.exd5 tOxd5 27.:txe8+. Fischer.Robert ~xe8 28.'fi'g3 ..-e4 29.lld1 :te8 'F ine.Reuben 30~d3 31.~h7+ 'it>xh7 New York 1963 32.J::rxdS J::re7 33..,bfS 'ti'e4 34.tI.:lgS 1.e4 e5 2.tI.:lf3 tOcs 3.i.c4 Ac5 4.b4 'ifxg6 35.A xe7 i.eS 3S.lldS "'f7 .bb4 5.c3 A a5 S.d4 exd4 , 7.0-0 37.J::rxbS ' ~c4 38..trb7 AfS 39.nc7 dxc3 ' 8.~b3 " 'iii'e7 9.tOxc3 ; tI.:lfS? .igS 40.i.xc5 'iWfS 41.A b4 " " 1-0 "
.84
56
Giuoco Piano
Giuoco Piano 1.~2-e4 ~7-e5
2.o'l:.. gl-f3
~ bB-c6 3 ..l1..f l-c4 .l1..fB-c5
4.d2-d3
The name Giuoco Piano (in ltalian : the quiet game) is often wrongly considered synonymous with the Italian Game, but in fact the two openings have game plans with very different strategic characteristics. The reason why this opening is called the Giuoco Piano is clear: White does not seek to ambitiously conquer the centre with c2-c3 and d2 -d4. Instead, he contents himself with slow, natural piece development: ,0,d3, ltJc3, 0-0, i..gS. In some lines White puts off ltJc3, reserving the option of c2-c3 in order to calmly prepare the d2-d4 pawn advance, with slow manoeuvring play. Sometimes the name Giuoco Pianissimo (in Italian: the very quiet game) is used for the lines in which White does not try to push his pawn to d4, even when his development is completed,
preferring to just get his pieces out instead. In the Giuoco Piano both players have equal opportunities. The main line is considered to be ltJgB-f6 4. d7-d6 5. ltJb1-c3 6. ~c1-g5 6 .£Le3 is interesting. h7-h6 6. 7. j!,g5xf6 'iYdBxf6 8. ltJc3-d5 'i¥f6-dB 9. c2-c3
Next, with the d3-d4 pawn advance White will conquer the centre, but Black's pair of bishops is adequate compensation. In these variations, which frequently feature castling on opposite sides, beginners will be wise to remember the old maxim: 'Black should never castle before White does'. In other words, if Black wishes to avoid unpleasant assaults by White, it is advisable to wait and see where the latter castles, so as to castle on the same side! Another common system also features White moving the pawn to c3. It is most often reached by transposition
S7
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
from the Two Knights or the Italian Game : lDgS-f6 4. 5. c2-c3 d7-d6 a7-a6 6. 0-0 With the idea of 7... lDa5. 7.
~c4-b3
~c5-a7
Prophylactically reducing the effectiveness of d2-d4. s. lDb1-d2 0-0 9. h2-h3
58
with slow manoeuvring play.
Th e Italian Game
The Italian Game l.e2-e4 e7-e5 2.~ 91-f3 t4-, b8-c6 3 .... f1-c4 "'f8-c5 4.c2-c3
which maintains the e5 outpost without conceding space to White. B) 4 . ... IiJg8-f6 Black attacks the weak point in White's position, namely the e4-pawn, which can no longer be defended by 1iJc3 , and concedes the centre in exchange for good piece play. 5. d2-d4
One of the oldest of all openings. Black's best continuation (4 .. ."2']f6) was suggested by the Portuguese author Pedro Damiano in 1512! In the Italian Game White plans to rapidly occupy the centre with c2-c3 and d2-d4, with the advantage, compared to the Ponziani Opening, of gaining a tempo by attacking the bishop on c5. Indeed, if Black responds with the passive 4 ... d6, after 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 ~b6 7 .h3!, White achieves his strategic objective of occupying the centre with his d-pawn and e-pawn without having any effective pressure on them. Black can fight against White's plan with two very different strategic set-ups : A) 4 .... Alekhine's move. 5. d2-d4
6. 0-0
'i!iVd8-e7 ~ c5-b6
d7-d6
The timid, but nonetheless commonly played 5.d3 transposes to the Giuoco Piano. e5xd4 5 .... 6. c3xd4 ~ c5·b4+ and you reach a crucial position where White has to make a fundamental strategic choice : sacrifice a pawn in exchange for the initiative with 7 .1iJc3 , or steer the game towards a quiet positional struggle with 7 .~d2. 59
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 81)
7. ttJb1-c3
This is more attractive looking, but probably less correct than 7. ~d2. It has a fascinating history: suggested by Greco as early as 1619 (!) it was revived by Steinitz in his match against Lasker in 1896. 7. .., ttJf6xe4 8. 0-01 Here it was already understood how dangerous the double capture on c3 is: 8 ... ttlxc3?! 9.bxc3 ~xc3? (but 9 ... dS! still gives Black a playable position) 1O..ia3!! with a winning attack. Therefore, it was routine to play ~b4xc3! 8. ... with the idea, after 9.bxc3, to play 9 ... dS!, with a good game for Black. In the Lasker match mentioned before, Steinitz tried - with little success - to breathe new life into the Greco Variation by playing the dubious I 0. ~a3. Fortunately, the renewed interest for this line led to Moller's extraordinary discovery of 9. d4-d5!? as an alternative to recapturing on c3. After years of intense theoretical study, the following carne to be considered the main line ~c3-f6 9 .... 60
10. .il:f1-e 1 11. ne1xe4 12. ~c1-g5 13. ttJf3xg5 14. 'iWd1-e2 15.1:ta1-e1
!3,
~
;...
.~
ttJc6-e7 d7-d6 jLf6xg5 h7-h6 h6xg5
"":"'~
J'i'!3, !3,!3,
n w
and now Black closes the e-file by means of IS ... ~e6 16.dxe6 f6!, with a position that was for years thought to be advantageous for Black. However, in the in 1980s there was yet another development: the discovery of 17.l:[e31, with the idea of Uh3 and a queen check on hs. The resulting position is not so clear. However, White's position continues to be viewed with some scepticism. 82) 7. ~c1-d2 This is the most played move: now Black can more ambitiously continue with the rare but promising 7 ... ttlxe4!? 8 .~xb4 ttlxb4 9 .~xf7+ 'it>xf7 10.'i¥b3+ dS II.ttleS+ ..t>e6!. However, more often than not he opts for the solid 7. ... ~b4xd2+ 8. ttJb1 xd2 d7-d5 Necessary to free up play. 9. e4xd5 ttJf6xd5 10. 'ii'd1-b3 ttJc6-e7 11. 0-0 0-0 12 . .J:l:f1-e1
The Italian Game
:as
This position is reminiscent of several variations of the Queen's Gambit Accepted. White has more active pieces and a slight initiative. Still. the isolated d4-pawn and the excellent outpost on dS for his knight give Black adequate resources.
, SteinfU.WiIhelni " ~ Von Bardeleben.Curt t, .
Hastings 1895 (10)
1.e4 e5 2,lbf3 ~c6 3.~c4 .§l.c5 4.c3 ~f6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 ~b4+ 7.~c3 :d5? 8.exd5 ~xd5 9.0-0 ~e610~g5 ~e7 11.bd5! .bd5 12.~xd5 'ii'xd5 · 13..be7 ~xe7 14.lIel f6 15.l\i'e2 1!fd7 [I S... 'iVd6? . J 6.'ifbS+ 'ifc6 . 17 .'ifb4 'tWd6 18~1!fxb7-] 16J:lacl11 [16.nadl! was the right way to ~xploit ·Wh·ite's better development: 16 .• :>1o>fl ,, 17.1!fc4+ ~dS . 18.~5+ fxeS 19.dxeS+-] ' 16_.<:6? [16...Wfl! was :the correct ,defence. enough'to maintain ' equality: 17 .1!fxe7+? (1 nWc4+ ~dS) . 17 .. :tWxei IS.%1xe7+ ' WXe7 19.J:.xc7+ Wd620.l:txb7 llhbS 21.11xg7 (2Ll:I.xbS ' lhbS 22.b3~dS:j:) 21....J:txb2 n .h3 .' n xa2g[i . With an unclear position; 16:..~f8 ; 16...~dSl 17.dS!! cxd5 [17 ... ~f1 IS.dxc6 tt:lxc6 19 .Ikdl~] :, 18.~d4 ~7 19.~e6 l:thc8 [19 ... tbc6 ;20.lbcS 1!fcs 21.1Iibs 1J.bS (21. .. lbdS 22.~d7 tbc6 23,>jWxdS+.Wg6 ..24.g4-)
n.lba6 (22 ... bxa6 23.'ihdS+) 23.'ifxdS+ \t>g6 24.lbcs l::tdS 2S.'ft'e4+ fS 26.'iVM~] 20.'ti'g4! g6 21.~5+ ~e8 [2 L.fxgS?? , 22. 'iVxd7+-:] 22.l:txe7+ ~ (22 ...the7 23J:txcS+; ·22...tj;>xe7 23 ..l:lel+] 23.l:tf7+1 ~gS! ' 24.l:tg7+1 ~hS' [24...cJ.?f8 2S.~xh7+ cJ.?xg7 26.'l!t'xd7++-] 25.l:txh7+1 (Black.li~id with rage after this'show of artistry. left the playing hall without actually resigning! Mate would have followed in 10 moves: 2S ... ~gS26.l:tg7+ <;PhS ' 27:i!fh4+ .'iPxg7 28.'i¥h7+ ' f8 29.'iWhS+ We7 30.tfg7+ ~e8 d l.'ifgS+ <j;;e7 32.'tWf1+ <Ji>dS 33."'f8+ 'ife8 34.~fl + Wd7 3S.'ifd6X] . 1-0
' Van den DoeI.Erik Sokolov,Ivan ' Lee~warden ch-NED 2004 (8)
1.e4 e5 2.tbf3 LDc6 3.i.c4 ~c5 4.c3 ~f6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 ~b4+ 7.~d2 i.xd2+ S.tbbxd2 d5 9.exd5 tt:lxd5 '10:tWb3 lbce711.0-0 0-0 12JUe1 c6 13.tbe4 ~b6 1.4~d3 tbed5 15.~c5 n b8 16.U,ac1 - lbf4 17.i.b1 'iff6 18.lbe5 "'95 19.'tWf3 f6 20.~ed3 ~ bd5 21.lbxf4 tbxf4 22.h4 · 'i'ih6 23.93 lbd5 24.~e4 tZlb6 25.'iVb3+ ..cJthS 26:ft'a3 J:ta8 2VAfe3 ' ~xe3 . 28J:txe3 l:tea 29.I:l.ce1 tbc4 30.n3e2 , ~d6 31.i.d3l:txe2 32 ..l:lxe2 c,t>gS ·. 33.~c2 b6 34.~b3+ cJtf8 35.lbe6+ .txe6 36 ..l:lxe6 lbf5 37.l:txc6 ~xd4 . 3S.l:tc7 lbxb3 39.axb3 J:tdS 40..l:lxa7 ttd3 41.1:1a3 b5 42.b4 l:td4 43.l:tb3 115 44.Wg2 ~7 45.Wf3 l:tc446.cJte3 95 47.f4gxh4 48.gxh4 <;P96 49.J:tc3 .l::rxb4 50J:tc5 .l::rb3+ 51.~e4 ttxb2 , 52.15+ "ph6 53.l:tc6 ttb4+ 54,~f3 .l:txh4 55.l:txf6+ ~95 56 ..l:l96+ <Ji>xf5 57.l:tb6 J:tb4 . · 0-1 61
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I It was only at the beginning of the 20th century, when the playability of 5 ... ltJa5 ! was discovered (as were 5 ... b5!? and 5 ... ltJd4!?) that the popularity of this defence boomed, as it was now seen as an effective way for Black to fight for the initiative. Indeed, 3 .. .ltJf6 has currently overtaken 3 ... ~c5 in popularity.
Two Knights Defence l.e2-e4 c 7-e5 2.'- '91-'3 ( ,b8-c6 3 .i.f1-c4 !: g8-f6
Against the Two Knights White has fundamentally three lines to consider - excluding 4.ltJc3?I, which allows 4,.. ltJxe4! with the idea of. ..d7-d5 .
.~
This defence was not ed by the Abruzzian Giulio Cesare Polerio in the 16th century, and discussed again by Giambattista Lolli and Domenico Lorenzo Ponziani two centuries later. In the 19th century it was adopted chiefly as a means of avoiding the much-feared consequences of the then reigning Evans Gambit. Why was it used just as an expedience in the past, given its popularity today? It should be remembered that even though 3...t2lf6 is the most natural move (it attacks the unprotected e4-pawn), it is in effect a pawn sacrific e ... at least from the modern viewpoint! 4.t2l g5 d5 5.exd5 used to be automatically followed by 5,. .ltJ xd5? I, but at this point either 6.ltJxj7!? (the celebrated Fried Liver Attack - also known by the original Italian name Fegatello Attack), or 6.d41, produces positions which are undoubtedly advantageous to White.
62
A) 4. d2-d3 The most solid and currently the most popular m ove. It is in line with the modern tendency to play 3 .~c4 with a positional approach. After 4 ,. .~c5, we are back in the Giuoco Piano. However, 4 .. .~e7 is the more popular choice. It is solid, even if slightly passive, and it generally leads to positions which are strategically similar to the Closed Spanish. B) 4. d2-d4 is a natural response in the centre, to which 4 .... e5xd4 is the best reply. You may be wondering why 3 ... ltJxe4 is valid after 3.d4 in the Petroff Defence, whereas in the Two Knights 4 ... ltJxe4? is considered to be so bad. The answer is that in the Two Knights after 5 .dxe5, White already threatens 6.'iVd5 with a clear advantage, whereas in the Petroff after 4.dxe5, Black gains easy equality with 4 ... d5 (there is no bishop on c4 to prevent this move).
Two Knights Defence 81) 5. e4-e5 In modern play this positional approach is the most usual continuation. d7-d5 5. S. ~c4-b5! With the g7-pawn defended, 6.exf6 does not make sense. tLlfS-e4 S. 7. tLlf3xd4
Arriving at a complex position. Black obtains satisfactory play after either the solid 7 ...~d7 or the aggressive 7 ... ~cS. 82) 5. 0-0 This classical move is currently less popular (S.c3 tDxe4!). Black can respond S ... tDxe4 6. J:te1 dS 7.i.xd5! ~xdS 8. tD c3 'tIi'aS (or 8 ... ~hS) with a balanced position and results that tend to favour Black. Another response is the more ambitious 5. ... ~fS-c5 S. e4-e5 We have arrived at th e famou s Max Lange Attack. S. d7-d5 7. e5xfS Now yes! 7. d5xc4 ~cS-eS S. llf1-e1 + 9. tLlf3-g5
The threat is lO. tDxe6 followed by 11. ~hS+ and then 12.~xcS. After th e virtually forced 'il;YdS-d5 9 .... comes 10. tLlb1-c3 This knight is immune because of the undefended l!¥dS. 10. ... 'iWd5-f5 11. tLlc3-e4 and the threat is 12.g4. It is surprising that with such active pieces White does not obtain anything after 11. ... 0-0-01 12. g2-g4 'Wf5-e5 Keeping the cS-bishop defended. 13. tDg5xeS f7xeS l:!hS-gS 14. fSxg7 15. ~c1-hS d4-d3 Dozens of games have demonstrated that the position is dynamically balanced with possibilities for both players. C) 4. tDf3-g5 The critical move, at least in terms of the application of chess theory, is this now comparatively little-played and romantic move. A 'beginner's move', huffed Tarrasch, who was famous for such dogmatic dismissals. d7-d5 4 .... 63
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Before examining this line, let's look at another surprising move available to Black: 4 ... ~cS!?
which delightfully ignores the attack on f7, so as to counterattack £1. This is the Traxler Variation (or Wilkes-Barre for the Americans), and it dates back to the end of the 19th century. After 5.tt'lxf7 j&x£1+!. Black seems to have sufficient counterplay, even if a hundred years of analysis has not fully explored the resulting positions. Let's just say that in practice it is easier to play the black side. lt is therefore not surprising that White prefers the safer 5 . ~xf7 +, even if after S... ~e7 (threatening 6 ... h6) 6. ~b3 or 6.j&d5, Black receives a certain degree of compensation with ... nhfS-~dS-eS- g6 and ... d7-d6 fol lowed by ... ~g4. It must be said that White, in addition to having an extra pawn, should be able to take advantage of the unhappy position of the black king on e7 if he can playa well-timed c3 and d4. 1n short, this counterattack is perhaps not 100% sound, but it is dangerous and greatly feared.
5. e4xd5 As we have already said, 5 ... tt'lxd5?! gives White the advantage after either 6.tt'lxj7!? (the Fegatello) or 6.d4!. 64
At this point the main move is 5. ... 4:lcS-a5 Also interesting are the Ulvestad Variation S... bS!? and the Fritz Variation S... ttJd4, which often merge at various stages: the following is a line that exemplifies the furious complications that can arise from S... ttJd4: 6.c3 bS 7 .~fl! 4:lxd5 S.4:le4 ~h4!? (S ...4:le6 is more solid) 9.tt'lg3 ~g4 10.f3 e4!
clearing the diagonal for the fS -bishop to exploit the uncomfortable position of the knight on g3 : 11.cxd4 j&d6 12..~.xb5+ \t>dS (the king is safer here than on fS), and now either the classical 13.0-0 or the more recent 13.'ifb3!? ~xg3+ 14.';t>d1 seems to give White the advantage . S. ~c4-b5+ 1n case of 6.d3 h6 7.ttJf3 e4!, Black obtains good play. c7-cS S.... 6 ... ~d7!? is also becoming popular.
7. d5xcS
bSxcS
8. ~b5-e2 S.'i!lVf3!? was not considered to be dangerous until recently. However, today it must be treated with respect: it was successfully employed by Karjakin in 2005 and by Short in 2006! 8. ... h7-hS
Two Knights Defence "
Brandenburg,Daan Postny,Evgeny , Hoogeveen 2006 (4)
For the pawn Black has a fairly significant lead in development and he is ready to grab centre space with his pawns. If White doesn't want to lose another tempo after 9.lLlf3 e4, he can continue with the unnatural but interesting 9.tOh3, which was played by Steinitz, and later by Fischer. Remember that White is a pawn up and that 9...~xh3 to create bad doubled pawns for White removes the dynamiC quality from Black's position. With his bishop pair and the weak c6-pawn, White can look to the future with confidence. Black's best option is to ignore the tOh3 and continue development with 9 ... ~cS and ... 0-0, with good compensation. The most common 9th move, however, remains 9.tOf3 and now 9 ... e4 10.tOeS ~d6 (10 .. :~ c7 is also playable)
. ..
.t 'ii'. '\ J ..X. '~' .. . ... ::' ...
:
~
""
,,
~,
,'''' ,.t . , ~ tb , :, ,,'
:<;, .. . '
'"'.;
";,'
.
~' ~ '~Jl'~ l~
!'3J 1:[ tb~ 'iY.W
,.
~
either II.M or II.f4. Black has compensation which is difficult to evaluate.
,1.e4 eS 2,tof3lLlc6 3.d4 exd4 4.11.c4 .lot6 5.eSlLle4 6.'ii'e2lLlcS 7.0-0 i..e7 S.l:id1 d5 9.AtbS 0-0 10..bc6 bxc6 11loxd4 "'eS 12.c4 f6 13.lLlc3 fxeS, 14.'tYxeS 'ii'f7 1S.'tVe2 Atd6 16.cxdS .i.g417.f3 J:taeS 1S.~d2 'ilYhS 19.h3 'fiM .'. 20."'f2 .ig3 21.'i1id2 ' .id6 22.~f2 i..g3 23.~d2 .bh3 24Ji'gS ' ~xd4+ c" 0-1 '1.
Nakanlura,Hikaru' , Ganguly,Surya Shekhar . Khanty Mansiysk 2005 (l)
.,
: 1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 lLlc6 3.d4 exd4 4.£t.c4 lLlf6 S.eS dS 6.ii.bS lLle4 7.lLlxd4 !.i'd78..bc6 bxc6 9.0-0 AcS 10.13 :lLlgS11.f4 ttJe412 ..ie3 'fibS 13.'ilYc1 : 'Axd4 )4..§t.xd4 cS 15.i..f2ii.bS ,16.l:td1 lLlxf2 17.'i;>xf2 i..c6 1S.lLld2 ''fib6 19.c4 d4 20:t'ic2 0-0 21.15 lladS 22.ltf1 .bs 23.'~g1 d3 .24 ....c3 l:td4 2S.lU2 J:[eS 26.l:te1 :"h6 27.'fia3 'fig5 28.g3 hS :29.1hts h4 30.ifxd4 hxg3 31.'it>f1 'gxf2 ' 32:t!;'xf2 '*'g4 33.16 gXf6 :34.J:[e3 1i'd1+ 35.1fe1 'iWxe1+ ,36.
Canal,Esteban ; , Monticelli,Mario Venice 1948
1.e4 eS 2,tt)f3lLlc6 3.d4 exd4 4.i.c4 'lLlf6 5.0-0 [S .lLlgS ?! dS 6.exdS lLlxdS? 65
Chess Opening Essentials - Volum e I
7.0~O ~e7 8.~xf7 ~xf7" 9.if3+· ~e6'<' 20Jid1 'Wf5 '21~b4 lbe6 ·· 22.'ifxc4 10Jt:lc3! dxc3 ll.l:!.el+ lbes 12..tf4 , lbf4 23.llxd4 t'!.xg2+ 24.~1 'iVg4 ,.ad6 13.gxe5 ~xe5 14.l:l.xe5+ ,lt'xe5 25.lt'e1 llg1+ 26.b1 nd2 ,16.M nxd1+ 17.11xd1 <;t>cS 24:~a4 a6 25J1g4 'ilYf7 26.t'!.g7 ' iLxh4 1S.lbxd5 cxd5 19.1:l.xd5 ~g5 ,'iffS 27.l:txh7 l:1dS 2S.~g4+ <;t>bS 20.l:!.d6+ \i;e7 . 2U{g6 • 'iWd2 29.l':e4 lbd5 30.'ife6 lbb4 3U:tf7 22Jlxg7+ WfS : 23.1:[gS+ we7 'iWhS 32.d4 ~h5 33.a3 lbd3 34.b4 24.lWh7X :' " ,, " 1-0 llhS , 35.h4 t!.gS \ 36.l:1e3 'i¥d1+ ., ,37.'ittg2 0xf2 3S.t'!.xf2 1:[g7 39.l':ef3 Radjab~v,Teimo~ '~ tii'xd4 40.'ilt'eS+ wa7 41.\'t'e3 ' 1-0 Naiditsch,Arkadij ~ " Warsaw'Ech 2005 (8)
: ' Cueto Chajtur,Johny , Soppe,Guillermo Buenos Aires2000 (1) ,
1.e4 e5 2.0f3lbc6 3.d4 exd4 4..ic4 e0fG 5.0-0 kc5 6.e5 d5 7.exfG dxc4 'S.neH ii.e6 9.lbg5 ~d5 10.lbc3 .f5 1Vbce4 0-0-0 ., 12.fxg7 'llhgS ; 13.ltJxc5 ~xc5 1~Ulxe6 fxe6 15.ltJxe6 flYd5 16.ltJxdS l':xg717.'i!ff1 0xdS . 1s.iLf4 ltJe6 ,.19..td2 ,. 0c5
66
"
"
1.e4 e5 2.0f3 ': tLlc6 3 ..tc4 lbf6 4.lbg5 · d5 5.exd5 1Z'1a5 6~b5+' c6 J.dxc6 bxc68.£Le2 ;'h6 9.0f3 e4' " 10.lbe5 i.d611.d4 exd3 12.lbxd3 'ilc713.b3 0-0 14.~b2 tLle4 15.0c3 idS 16.h3 lladS 17.0-0 c5 1S.ii.f3 lbg5 19.0d5 'iWd7 20.h4 .. 0e6 ' 21.0e5 flYeS 22.11e1 AbS 23.'iWd2 '@b5 24.c4 'fi'a6 2S ..tc3 0b7, .,'"'' 26,lbc6 , .,.w ....... ,.' ,,;.,,,, .' ",','" ••,~.' 1-0 '
Ruy Lopez
Ruy lopez 1.e2-c4 e7-e5 2 . ~gl-f3 "~b8-c6 3.~fl-b5
his d-pawn to d6 . However, this puts White in the most favourable position for expanding in the centre with d4. An alternative for Black in modern variations is to free himself of the annoying white bishop with ... a6 and ... b5, which is not without its negative consequences. It is important to understand what the negative positional aspects are of this preventive measure to defend the e5 -pawn with a queenside expansion. Let's compare the following two diagrams :
' :,,'
..,-.,
.
',~.,'~
The Ruy Lopez (also called the Spanish Opening) is named after the Spanish clergyman who in 1561 declared 3 .~b5 to be White's best 3rd move. In his study he demonstrated that 3 ... o1:lge7, which at that time was considered forced (!), is in fact unsatisfactory and he recommended that L.d6 be played instead of L .o1:lc6. A conclusion repeated by Philidor two centuries later! Naturally, it was qUickly understood that the 'threat' £!.xc6 followed by o1:lxe5 is not real because of .. .'/i'd4, or better still ... ~g5, which regains the pawn with an advantage. With this information in mind, Black has a wide choice of playable lines. In this light, it has been correctly noted that the Ruy Lopez is quite literally a 'threatening' opening: in the sense that White is continually threatening to exchange on c6 at the most opportune moment. For this reason, at some point Black will have to defend the e5-pawn by moving
The first diagram shows the pOSition in the Ruy Lopez after 3 ... a6 4 .£!.a4 b5 5 .~b3. The second shows the classical position after 3.£!.c4.
E :. 1. 'if ~ i.1.I\ .i 'i i 'A'i i 'i i .1.1\ ,~
If you were Black, which of the two positions would you choose? If you see 67
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
the opening as a simple process of developing the pieces you will choose the first; Black has gained space on the queens ide and is ready to continue developing with ...Jk.b7. However, this is not the best choice! Actually, chess opening theory assigns to White the advantage in the first position and equal possibilities for both players in the second. Why? Because on b3 the bishop denies Black various tactical resources. One example is that in response to the natural 5 ....itc5? there is the very strong 6.lt:Jxe5! followed by a fork, a sequence that is obviOUsly not available with the bishop on c4. However, the real problem is the b5 -pawn: its presence on that square favours a White queenside attack; a timely a2-a4 can be the basis for an enduring initiative. This consideration could seem esoteric, but for proof of its practical importance look at the following diagram:
68
Here we have the main line of the Marshall Attack (dealt with in more depth later), one of the most popular and feared of Black's options against the Ruy lopez. Black is a pawn down, but he has a dangerous initiative on the kingside: White's only resource is the advance a2-a4; and he hopes that energetic counterplay on the queenside will make it impossible for Black to realize his aggressive plans on the other side of the board. If Black could play the pawn from b5 to b7 (!) his attack would probably be winning, but alas, this pawn move is against the rules.
Ruy Lopez without 3 . .. a6
Ruy Lopez without 3 ...a6 1.e2-e4 e7-e5 2.tbg l -f3
'j_b8-c6 3 ..i.fl-b5
We will now start to look at specific variations. After 3 ..tb5, Black has many playable moves at his disposal of which 3 ... a6 is by far the most common. We will look at that move later. Let's begin with the variations without 3...a6, in ascending order of popularity. A)
3 ....
d7-d6
4. d2-d4 ~cS-d7 5. tLlb1-c3 tLlgS-f6 The modern treatment: 5 .. .exd4 6.ltJxd4 g6!? is more dynamiC. 6. 0-0 ~fS-e7 7. l:tf1-e1 White threatens 8. ~xc6 and 9.dxe5, so Black must concede the centre with 7. e5xd4 S. tLlf3xd4
With a position similar to the Open Sicilian with the difference that Black has a pawn on c7 instead of on e6. This re duces Black's possibilities of counterplay. White has a good space advantage, greater control of the centre and access to the f5 -square; giving him good kingside prospects. This is not to say that Black's position is lost, only that it offers no exciting prospects. B)
3 ....
tLlgS-e7
The Steinitz Defence, similar to the Steinitz Deferred, which we will examine later, but with important differences. The Steinitz is solid, but a little passive. 69
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
The Cozio Defence, which was played when .l1l.xc6 was still considered a threat. In modern times it was reused by Bent Larsen, but it has never become popular. 4. S. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. 11.
0-0 c2-c3 d2-d4 c3xd4 e4xdS J:!.f1-e1+ .l1l.c1-gS ttJb1-d2
g7-g6 .l1l.fS-g7 eSxd4 d7-dS ttJe7xdS .l1l.cS-e6 '/WdS-d6
White has good piece play and an unpleasant initiative.
4.
S. 0-0 6. d2-d3
3 ....
7.
~ bS-a4
~fS-cS
c7-c6 ttJgS-e7
White has a small but lasting advantage because of his better pawn structure and kingside initiative.
3 ....
g7-g6
ttJc6-d4
This is the Bird Defence, which every now and then pops up in tournament play: You reach a position not usually associated with the Ruy Lopez after
70
eSxd4
S. f2-f4
D) C)
ttJf3xd4
It is unusual because there are not the customary opposing pawns on e4 and e5 . Black has free play and the bishop on b5 seems to be a little out of play: The reali ty is that after
This is often called the Smyslov Variation. It remains a solid and reliable defence. Usually White gains central space with 4.
d2-d4
Ruy Lopez without 3 ... 06
4.c3!? a6! 5. ~a4 d6 transposes to a line of the Steinitz Deferred. 4. _ e5xd4 Practice has taught that recapturing on d4 gives Black a free game after ... ~g7 and .. .tb f6, and for this reason White usually responds with 5.
~c1-g5!?
speculating on the weakness of square f6. 5. ~fS-e7 S. ~ g5xe7 'ifdSxe7! 7. ~b5xcS d7xc6 S. ~ d1 xd4 lZlgS-fS 9. lZlb1-c3 ~cS-g4
Variation. This is one of the oldest responses, which is hardly surprising given how natural it is for Black to play ... iLc5 in open games. However, a natural move is not necessarily also the best. Here the problem is evident. By placing the bishop on this square Black encourages White to occupy the centre with c3 followed by d4. An attentive reader may well ask: 'But doesn't the same thing happen in the Italian Game?'. The answer is that with the white bishop on c4 instead of b5 there are two differences: one strategic and the other tactical. Strategically, the bishop on b5 is applying pressure on the c6-knight; thematically, the idea is to apply pressure on the centre. Tactically, in some lines White has the extra resource of 4Jxe5 followed by the fork on d4, a motif that is obviously not available with the bishop on c4. 4. c2-c3 lZlgS-fS 5. 0-0 0-0 5 ... lZlxe4 is also playable. S. d2-d4 ~c5-bS!
White does not have an easy time exploiting his positional advantage. E)
3 . ...
~fS-c5
This is the Classical Variation, which is sometimes referred to as the Cordel
We have reached a position typical for Open Games, in which Black does not concede space and maintains his pawn on e5. However, there is an important difference with the Closed Spanish: instead of on e7 the dark-squared bishop 71
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
is developed more actively. This is not to say that this placement of the dark-squared bishop is without negative aspects: it says enough that the results tend to favour White. After 4.c3, a spectacular (even if not completely sound) gambit is 4 ... f5!? 5 .d4 fxe4 6. ~xc6!? dxc6 7. tZlfd2!.
The ensuing complications seem to favour White, considering that 7...exd4?? would lose a piece after 8.'fiihS+.
3 ....
F)
f7-f5
This is the popular and feared Jaenisch Gambit (also called the Schliemann Defence by some opening experts) . It is perhaps not completely sound. However, its appeal continues to attract a host of amateur and correspondence players, while players on the professional tour72
nament circuit tend to regard it with a certain scepticism. It is true that if White knows all the complications of the main lines, he is sure to gain a concrete advantage. Otherwise he will be lucky to get out alive, as the unprepared player must work his way through the labyrinth of tactical and strategiC complications presented by the gambit. Black, in the spirit of the King's Gambit, immediately counterattacks the e4-pawn, relying on the fact that 4.exf5 will give him good counterplay after 4 .. .e4. Radical attempts, such as 4.d4, have been used in an attempt to refute the Jaenisch Gambit: they have not borne fruit. In the end, people realized that White's best plan is simply to develop, relying on the fact that the move f5 is not a developing move and that it also weakens the kingside. In this light 4. ~b1-c3! which defends e4 and at the same time develops a piece, is the best move, even if after 4.... f5xe4 4 .. .tZlf6 and 4 ... tZld4 are also played. 5. ttJc3xe4 Black seems to be able to gain space in the centre and to gain tempi for his development with the pawn advance 5. ... d7-d5
Ruy Lopez without 3 .. . a6
But White, who enjoys a net advantage in terms of piece activity and development, does not pull back his knight, but instead aims for a tense position with 6. lLIf3xeS! 7. tLleSxc6
dSxe4
F2) 'ii'dS-gS 7. This counterattack on g2 is the most popular. S. ~d1-e2! Attacking e4 and defending bS and indirectly - g 2 at the same time. S. ... 9. f2-f4!
tLlgS-f6
This last move defends g2 with gain of a tempo. 9. 'lWgSxf4 9 ... '1lUh4+ also gives White an advantage. 10. tLlc6-eS+ 11. d2-d4
The recapture of the knight on c6 gives White an advantage, and therefore Black moves the attacked queen to dS or gS : F1) ~dS-dS 7.... This has the advantage of immediately threatening 8 ... bxc6, but after the 'almost' forced sequence S. c2-c4! 9. tLlc6xa7+ 10. VWd1-hS+ 11. itbSxd7+ 12. 'ii¥hS-eS+ 13. tLla7-bS! 14. ~ eS-d4!
c7-c6
Attacking the queen and gaining another tempo. This is the idea of9.f4. 11. 12. 13. 14.
... g2-g3 itbS-c4 .\tc1-gS
'iYf4-h4+ 'tWh4-h3 .\tcS-e6
'it'dS-d6! ~cS-d7
g7-g6 ~d6xd7
weS-f7 c7-c6
f'::,.
..'-:,
"",. II
and White has a clear advantage, even if the battle is not over yet.
White is better.
tLlgS-f6 G) 3 .... The Berlin Defence. It suddenly became fashionable at the end of the 20th century chiefly thanks to its adoption by Kramnik in his victorious match against Kasparov. Like the Petroff Defence, it is considered to be one of the best ways to
73
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
draw as Black against very strong opponents, presuming of course that you have mastered the required technique.
The queens are exchanged very early on and often quickly an endgame is reached, where White's superior pawn structure is not at all easy to exploit. It is for this reason that some have christened it the Berlin Wall! It is a consoling thought that this symbol of the Cold War now only exists on the chessboard. 4. 0-01 ttJf6xe4 The capture that is the key move of the system. Instead, 4 ... d6 transposes to the Steinitz Defence, while with 4 ... ~cS we reach the Classical Variation. 5. d2-d4! White wants to open the e-file : practice has shown that 5 Jle I ttJd6 does not cause Black problems. ttJe4-d6! 5 . ...
74
This option is not available to Black in the Ruy Lopez with 3 ... a6, as there the white bishop is on a4. At this pOint, after 6.dxeS ttJxbS, White will regain the piece with 7.a4, but it seems a little innocuous. If White wants to obtain anything he must give up his bishop pair and accept a queen trade-off. 6. iiLb5xc6 d7xc6 7. d4xe5 ttJd6-f5! The most active square for the knight. 8. 'lifd1 xd8+ It>e8xd8
we have a position that is strategically reminiscent of certain sub-variations of the Exchange Variation of the RUy Lopez in which the queens leave the board very quickly. As in the Exchange Variation, here too the pawn ending is technically winning for White, given the doubled pawn on c6. However, Black's bishop pair and unhindered development make White's task of exchanging all the pieces very arduous. Here too, Black has the added advantage that the pawn on eS supplies Black with outposts on f4 and d4. This makes it easier to block White's kingside pawn majority. Statistically, the percentage of draws is very high (44%). At the same time the number of black victories is obViously well below average.
Ruy lopez withou t 3 .. . 06
'" 'Nim;~witsch,Aaron ;, . Capablanca.Jose Raul "
~
. ''''~b4 2SJ U2 fS 26.Ugf4 fxe4 27.a3 . , l:1d4 28.tLle2 !:ld7 29.tLlg3 l:l:e7
St' Petersburg 1914 ' ; 30.l:1g4 >t;>h 7 3UUf4 " '" " 1-0 1.e4 eS 2.tLlf3 tLlc6 3.tLlc3 · tLlf6 :4 .il.bS d~ S.d4. Ad7 6.Axc6 Axc6 •7.'iWd3 exd4 8.tLlxd4 g6?! 9.tLlxc6?1 Vul,Arkady ; [9 ,~gS ~g7 · 10.0-0-0!?] 9... bxc6 .Arkhangelsky.Mikhail ~ 10.'i'a6 ~d7 11.\\tb7 11c812.~xa7Moscow 1999 'Ag7 13.0-0 .0-0 ., ' 14.Wia6 Ufe8 1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3' tLlc6 3 ...tb5 g6 4.0-0 ·1S.'iYd3 [IS.f3!?] 15...1We6!16.f3 . ~g7 S.c3 tLlge7 6.d4 exd4 7.cxd4 dS 8.exd5 tLlxdS 9.lle1+ ~e610.il.g5!? ;tLld717.il.d2?[17.il.f4 tLleS lS ..!tXeS ;~xeS 19J1ab1] 17...tLleS18.~e2 tLlc4 [I0.tLlg5 l\Vd6; 10.tLle5. O-O! 11.tt:lxc6 ' 19.l:tab1 J:l.a8 20.a4 tLlxd2 2UWxd2 bxc6 12.il.xc6 J:l.bS] 10...lfdS11.tLlbd2 0-0 12.tLle4 'ifb4 13..b c6 bxc6 :'ii'c4 ' 22 ..llfd1 J:teb8 23.'iVe3? ![23.1Ii'd3 'ifcS+ ' 24_~h1 llb4 .2S.lbe2 14.~c1 .bd4? (14 ....llfeS! 15 .~2 was the lesser evil] 23...J:l.b4 24Ji'gS 'Wb6; 15 ... ~b5] 1S.tLlxd4 't'ixd4 16:iVxc6 'i¥xb2 17.r.tad1 ~b6 \ t d4+ 2S.~h1 Jlab8 26.llxd4 'f!lYxd4 ' 27ltd1 , Wic4 28.h4 !:lxb2 29.iVd2 ' 18.Wic41 [lS.VW~ l f6 19.i..h6 !:lfes ~'WIcS 30J1e1 ~h5 31 ..lla1 " ~xh4+ 20.h3 i..f5? (20 ... il.f7 21.'l!\fa 1±) 32.~g1 ~hS . 33.aS l:ta8 34.a6 ,.. 21.'i'ic4 ~xe4 22.1:txe4c6 23 .l:txdS! 1-0 :'ifcS+ 3S.~h1 ,. ~c436.a7 1WcS " MilliC-Dety, B~lgrade 1965) 18...1Wb4 ,37.eS 'iYxeS 38Jla4 fi' hS+ 39.~gt [18.. .£6 19.tLlxf6+ lhf6 20.£txf6 tt:le3 t\WcS+' 40.~h2 dS 4Ul h4 llxa7 21.'ft'e4 tLlxdl 22.'*YxaS+
"C~" MureYtYaacov •. Dreev,Alexey
20.lLlf6+ \ith8
~
Moscow 1989 (2) i 1.e4 eS 2.tLlf3 tLlc6 3.il.bS tLlge7 4.tLlc3 9S . S.d4 exd4 6.tLldS ..tg7 .7.i..gS h6 8.~f6 il.xf6 9.tLlxf6+ t;>f2 l:Lh3 20.fxg4 ~xg4 21.n ag1 lld8 · 22.11xg4 I:I.xd4 23.>t;>g2 ·l:te3 24J U1 t
C',
v
21.'iYh4+-;
19 .. .f6!
20.tLlxf6 + J:l.xf6 2 J.h f6' ~xd5 22 .'iVc3-:-- VuI)20.tLlf6+! llxf6 21.l:txe6! 'i'bl+ (2L.J:l.xe622.J:ldS+! l1xd8 23.~xe6+ >t;>g7 24.~e7++-) n.J:1dl! 'i!fxdl+ 23.l:e1+ · liVd5 24. ~xd5+cxd5 25.~xf6+:-] 19.tLlf6+ gS23 .~hS f6 24.l:txe6 >t;>xhS 25.lhf6+-; 21...J1fbS 22.'ifxf6+ WgS 23.~h6 'ifb2 24.J:f.d4+ ....:] 22.Ud71 1-0 75
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Monticelli.Mario , Spiell1lil1lD..Rudolf Warsaw 01 1935 (16)
, '.
e,
., Kasparov.Garry Krantnik·Vladimir London Weh m 2000 (3)
1.e4 eS 2.tZlf3 tLlcS 3.il..b5 tZlfS 4.0-0 1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 tLlcS 3•.ib5 f5 4.tLlc3 fxe4 5ltjxe4 tLlfS S.1t'e2 dS 7.tLlxfS+ tLlxe4 5.d4 tLldS, S..bcS dxcS gxfS . S.d4 e4 9.tLlh4 'iWe7 10~f4 7.dxe5 tZlfS S:iWxdS+ rJ;xdS 9.tZlc3 ~eS 11.g3 as 12.il..xcS+ bxcS il..d710.b3 hS 11.i1..b2 Wc8 12.l:tad1 bS ,13.lbe2 cS 14.c4 .IlLcS 1S.tZlf41? 13~h61!Vb4+ 14.c3'iWb5 15:ii!Vxb5 cxbS 1S.hfS J:.xfS 17.tZlg2 ~d7 rJ;b7 1S.tZld5 tZle717.J:fe1 J:.gSI? 1S.tLlf4 b4 19.cxb4 rtfbS 20.a3 a5 , ' 18.tZlf4 g5119:tbh5l:tgS 20.tLlfS ~g7 21.:td3 .bt3 22.ltxf3 .bf6 23.exfG · 21.b3 axb4 22.a4 i.f7 23.J:.c1 lt85 24.tZle2 ' A hS 2S.~d2 :tcS 2S.J:tc2 tLlcS 24.J:td3 :fS 25.l:te4 ~c8 , .be2 27.~xe2 cS 2S.dxcS J:.axc5 26.f4?1 gxf4 27..l:txf4 :teS 2S•.itc3. 29Jtd2 . ltc2 ' 30•.r:ta1 ' rtxd2+ l:te2 29JU2 ne4 30.J:th3 a5 31.J:.hS 31.<;i;>xd2 .r:tc3 32.aS rJ;c7 33.aS 'it'bS a4 32.bxa41? Ibc4 33 ..id2 llxa4 34.l:ta5 ltd3+ 35.rJ;e2 'it'a7 3S ..r:tb5 34.I;IxhS l:tgS 3S.l:.h7 J:xa2 3S.J:xf7, l:!:xb3 37.l:.xd5 'it'xaG 3S..r:tdS+ 'it'b5 tLle5 37.11g7 tUs 3S.h3 c4 39.:e7 39.1bfS l:td3 40.lU7 hS 4Utb7+ .... tLld3 AO.f7 tDxf2 4U1eS+ '~d7 •<;f;>c4 42.J:.e7 b3 43.l:txe4+ ",",c3 42.:txfS " ~e7 43.ltc8 rJ;xf7 44.1:1eS rJ;c2 45 ..r:txhS b2 4S.J:cS+ 44.l:txc7+ rJ;eS 45.il..e3 tLld1 nc3 47.J:bS ltb3 4S.J:cS+ ltc3 4S.il..xbS c3 47.h41? nas 4S.1i.d4 49.:tbS b1~ SO.:txb1 ~xb1 S1.h4 l:ta4= 49..ltxc3 tLlxc3 50.l:txc3 ttxh4 ~c2S2.h5 <;f;>b3 53.g4 rJ;c4 54.hS S1.nf3 J:l.hS S2.<;t>f2 J:rg5 53.l:l:fS <;t>eS ' lh-1I2'~ lth3 5S.g5 rJ;d4 0-1
Shtyrenkov.Veniamen . Annageldyev.Orazly
" Almasi.Zoltan Alexandrov.Alexey . Moscow Aeroflot Open 2007 (3)
1.e4 eS 2.tZlf3 tZlcS 3.i.b5 tDfS 4.0-0 1.e4 eS 2.tZlf3 tZlcS 3.1i.b5 fS 4.tLlc3 tZlxe4 S.d4 tZldS , S..bcS dxc6 7.dxe5 tZlf5 S.'fWxdS+ rJ;xd8 9.tZlc3 fxe4 5.tZlxe4 tZlfS S.ti'e2 d5 7.tZlxf6+ gxfS S.d4 il..g7 9.dxe5 fxe5 10.ttJxeS il..d7 10.b3 'it'cS " 11 ..ib2 il..e7 0-0 11.tZlxcS bxcS 12 ..bc6 l:tbS 12.:tad1 as 13.a4 l:tdS 14.h3 hS 13.c4 .itaS 14..bd5+ rJ;hS 15.J:1b1 15.l:td3 bS 1S.J:1fd1 A e8 17JlxdS+ iLxd8 1S.tZle2 il..e7 19.eS .. fxeG lleS 1S.il..e3 cS 17..bcS ~c3+ 1S.~f1 . l:txb2 " 19.1Ifd1 . .bc4+ · 20.tZlf4 b5 21.tLlxeS bxa4 22.bxa4 gS ' 23.g4 hxg4 - 24.hxg4 tZlhS 20.'it'g1 l:txb1 21.'iYxb1 ltxe3 22.fxe3 . ~d2 23.'ti'bS+ il..gS 24.g4 2S.tZle5 c5 2S.h3 J:aS 27.tLlxc5 ~xe3+ 25.rJ;g2 1Ife2+ 2S.~h3 h5 ' ~xc5 2S..bc5 ~xa4 29•.Sl.e3 tZlgS 27.'ilVf4 hxg4+ 2S.~h4 1Ife7 + 30.i.gS l:l:dS 31.1::'a1 .bc2 32.l:txa5 29.<;t>h5 1!Vh7+ 30.<;t>g5 .,: 'iWg7+ tZlfS 33.ttc5 i.e4 34.f3 ..tb7 35.rJ;f2 31.~f5 'iWfG+ 32.'it'xg411fgS+ , 0-1 tLld7 3S.tLlxd7 rJ;xd7 37.ilf4 , 112: 1f2 • Alushta 2005 (6) ,:'
76
Ruy Lopez with 3 ... 06
Ruy Lopez with 3 ...a6 1.c2-e4 e7-c 5 2.~ gl-f3 !i ,b8 -c6 3 ...l..fl -b5 ~7-~fl
.
~
This move is the most popular response to the Ruy Lopez, even though there are other valid options, like the Berlin Defence. The philosophy behind the Berlin is very hazardous: I will accept doubled pawns, I will give my opponent space and a lead in development, but...!!! I have my bishop pair and my hope is that White's centre will be overextended. The result is a draw rate which is much higher than average. Black players who want a more ambitious system turn to more active defences such as the Sicilian, the Modern/Pirc, the Alekhine, or
in some cases the French. Some variations of the Ruy Lopez can also be recommended, such as the Jaenisch Gambit, which was examined in the previous section on the Ruy Lopez without 3 ... a6. In the RUy Lopez with 3,. .a6 the most aggressive option is the Marshall Attack, but the dynamic possibilities of the Archangel and New Archangel variations should not be forgotten. Neither should those of several variations of the Open Spanish. So now we have the most common move, 3 ... a6. Before continuing with his development, Black prefers to reserve the option of pushing the pawn to b5, so as to rid himself of the irritating pressure being applied on the c6-knight by White's bishop. The most popular of the various responses to 3,..a6 is 4. ~a4. This does not mean that the exchange on c6, which we will discuss in the next section, is to be underestimated, even though it has been dismissed by many as toothless. Nonetheless, some of the most famous white victories in the Ruy Lopez have been scored with this very variation, such as those of Lasker against Tarrasch and Capablanca, and more recently some brilliant victories with it by the 11 th World Champion, the American Bobby Fischer.
77
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Ruy Lopez Exchange Variation 1.04 c5 2. ~ .f3 ~c6 3 .j,:,b5 a6 4.1I..xc6
.~;-
," ,.;;j~~ . ~,;
.'. .;'
Before, castling had been mistakenly believed to be dubious because of S... i.g4 (this move is still played, but has now been overshadowed by the classical 5 .. .f6 and the modern 5...~d6).
White usually retreats the bishop to a4, but 4.~xc6, the Exchange Variation, is also a relatively frequent choice. After decades of stagnation, it became celebrated again through Fischer's successful employment of it during the 1960s. In the new millennium it still has its adherents. You may think that White's only winning strategy would be winning the pawn endings that the variation produces. However, variations characterized by opposite castling are not rare, and in these cases the predominate concern is the attack on the king. 4. ... d7xc6 Now taking on e5 is useless, as after 5 ... fUd4, Black will regain the pawn with an advantage. In the past, at this point either 5.d4 or 5.ttJd was played, but Fischer's contribution was to demonstrate the power of 5. O-O!
78
Now, castling is a move that leads to a flexible position. Depending on the circumstances, White keeps the possibility of the d4 pawn advance, with or without a preparatory c2-d, or the option of simply plonking the pawn solidly on d3 . After 5.0-0, Black has many playable responses. If we can trust the statistics, the results with at least five alternative variations are more or less the same. We will ignore the minor lines that appear to be of doubtful merit. The following variations are in ascending order of popularity: A)
5 ....
ttJg8-e7
Ruy Lope z - Exchan8e Variation One of the most aggressive defences : it closes the e-file so that the queen can take on e4 after 6.tt:lxe5 'iWd4. In addition, the knight is ready to go to the excellent square g6, or at times to c6. In the event of 6.tt:lxe5 'iWd4 White can try 7 .'lWh5!? g6 8. ~g5 (also of interest is 8.tt:lf3!? ~xe4 9 .~a5) 8 ... ~g7 9.tt:ld3 f5! with complicated play. B)
~fS-d6
5 ....
6. h2-h3! Black would be in a crlSlS situation (6 ... ~h5 loses a pawn without compensation due to 7.g4, while 6 .. .~xf3 gives up the bishop pair to soon) if he did not have the continuation 6. ... h7-h5! 7. d2-d3! 7.hxg4? hxg4 and Black will deliver mate on the h-file. 7. 'fWdS-f6 ttJgS-e7 S. ttJb1-d2 9. l::tf1-e1 ttJe7-g6 and Black seems to have a dangerous initiative. But now it is time for White to play energetically (avoid 1O.hxg4? hxg4 11.tt:lh2 ~c5 with the idea of12 ...g3): 10. d3-d4!
A little passive. 6. d2-d4 e5xd4 7. 'fWd 1 xd4! fN6 S. ~c1-e3 White has the freer game.
C)
~cS-g4
5 ....
It seems logical but after
to
pin the f3 -knight,
With this move, White seeks to exploit his lead in development, effectively threatening to take the bishop on g4 (for example, 10 ... 0-0-0? II.hxg4 hxg4 12 .tt:lh 2 with the idea of 13 .~xg4+) or the pawn on e5 (10 ... exd4 I \. e5!) with optimum results for White. However, chess theory is constantly evolving: the move IO ... tlJf4!? was considered to be lacking in the past, but according to the latest analysis it would appear to give Black sufficient re79
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
sources. If this proves to be true, the S...ii.g4 variation could become fashionable again.
D)
5 ....
~dS-d6
It seems unnatural to defend the eS -pawn with the queen, but in doing so Black prepares for a quick ... 0-0-0, and the results with this plan appear to be encouraging. An interesting way to try and exploit the exposed position of the queen on d6 is 6. ttJb1-a3!? with the idea of ~c4. ~cS-e6 6 .... 6 ... bS is playable but committing. 7. 'iYd1-e2 f7-f6 S. ttJa3-c4 'iVd6-d7 9. :tf1-d1 c6-c5 10. c2-c3
The posltlon is strategically rich and gives both sides chances. E) f7-f6 5 .... Solidly defending eS. 6. d2-d4 Now Black has two equally effective plans:
E1) iLcS-g4 6 .... The classical approach. Black tries to maintain the outpost on eS . At this stage White can choose to simplify with 7 .dxeS, which gives - after the queens are exchanged - a minute advantage. However, this small plus is difficult to exploit. Alternatively, he could continue more ambitiously with 7. c2-c3
which was Fischer's preferred move. 7. iLfS-d6 S. ~c1-e3 ttJgS-e7 9. ttJb1-d2 'iYdS-d7 Black has the bishop pair and a solid position, but White's occupation of the centre with his pawns gives him a small edge. E2)
80
6. 7. ttJf3xd4
e5xd4 c6-c5
Ruy Lopez - Exchonge Variation
,·s:
~lt~i
i,t~
8. tlld4-b3 iVd8xdl .ltc8-g4! 9. J:l:flxdl 10. f2-f3 .ltg4-eS 11. ~cl-e3 b7-bS rJ;;>e8-f7 12. a2-a4 Black's free piece play compensates for his inferior pawn structure.
[too late for · an effective defence: ,29 ... gxfS 3D.exfS dS31.gS! hxgS+ · 32.hxgS fxgS+ 33.tllxg5+ Wf834.f6 I:ta7 ' 3S.\ioJeS!] 30.~f3
Lasker,Emanuel .•. . Tarrasch,Siegbert . GerinanyWchm 1908 (1)
1.e4 eS 2.d2 Ae8 25.eS lth3 39.f4 ~d8 40.f5 J:!h4 ' with the problem of defending the ~es-pawn. Lasker;s idea ' was to exploit 41.1S gxf6+ 42.wxf6 ~eS 43.f7 we4 S2.WeS wd3 S3.'.t>dS ~ 10.t4 l:1eS [lD ...f5"lI.eS .lics 1 2...~.e3 wc3 54.wxc6 wxb3 SS.wbS... 1-0 "h d4 13.hd4 b6] 11.f2 !:ta7 23.g4 hS 24.1:!:d3 . ~d4 7.~h5 gS S:~HgS Ag7 9.f3 I:tgS2S.\ioJf4 gS 29.11g3 g5+ 13.~f4 .ib7 14.f3 ~xf4 lS.
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I ,
. ... ~
-~
'l •
,.thS ,16.tde2 0-0-0 17.14 95 18.d3 gxf4 19.tLlxf4 " llhg8 20.g3 tLlg6 21.tLlg2 f4 22.tLle1 fxg3 23.hxg3 ~e3+ 24...t>h2 ndf8 25.llxf8+ J:rxf8 2S.tLle3 ~d4 27.tLla4 llf1 28.94 J:th1": 29•..t>g3 llg1 + 30...t>h2 ~f2 0-1 i
"
Radjabov. Teimour
" Harikrishna,Pentala Cap d'Agde rapid 2006 (2)
1.e4 eS 2.tLlf3 tLle6 3..tbS as 4 ..be6 ' dxe6 5.0-0 ~g4 6.h3 jt"xf3 7."fVxf3 "i'd7 8.d3 f6 9.tLld2 .adS 10.tDe4 tDe 7 ,11.lIfhS+tDgS 12.tLlxd6+ cxd6 13.f4' exf4 14..i.xf4 0-0 1S~.ag3 d5 16.exdS ."iVxdS 17."i!VxdS+ exd5 18.c4 dxc4 :19.dxc4 ; nfe8 20J~ac1 ne6 . 21.b3 " llac8 22.ncd1 b5 23.exb5 , axb5 .24.11dS 'lle2 25.llf2 nxf2 2S.>itxf2 'l:le2+ 27.wf3 r:.e3+ 28.'M2 1:tc2+ '29.>t>f3 1f2-1f2 " ,.. ... -.... ' >.' ~ ....
82
~
.
~
.~
".;,.-
Mecking.Henriqne '" Kort~hnoi; Viktor Augusta m 1974 (12)
1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 tLle6 3.jLb5 a6 4..beS dxe6 5.0-0 Vj"dSI? S.d3 [here' the strategic goal is not the ending but .' to attac:k with Opposit~,~side' 'castling]' " S...fS 7•.te3 .tg4 ' 8.tt;lbd2 0-0-0 (8 ... tLle7] 9.l:I.b1 tde7 10.b4 gS11.a4' tdg6 12.bS ' exb5 13.axb5 ' axbS 14J:txb5 'tlfe61S.11b2 .teS 1S.tLlb3 ~b4 17.tLlfd4 exd4'18.'i!fxg4+ ~d7, 19."fVxd7+ 1:txd7 20.tLlxd4 ' ~e3 21.lla2 llxd4 22.na3 llb4 23.l:.xe3 . n e8 24.f3 Wd7 2S.J:ta1 nbS 26.<;i;>f2 'dS 27.J:taa3 h5 28.J:ta4 eS 29.llea3' g4 30.1:1aS l:leeS ' 31.J:txb5 J:txb5 32.fxg4 hxg4 33.W'g 3 J:Ib1 34.~d4 lle135.11e3 b5 as.hf6 b4 37.11b3' nf1 38.~g5 e5 39.<:3 bxe340.lbe3 J:td141 ..te3e4 ',.~ ..,' . . . 1-0' .
Ruy Lopez - Minor Variat io ns af te r 4.jLa4
Ruy Lopez Minor Variations after 1.e4 e5 2 ." ,f3 ~ en 3.i.:.b5 a6 11.i.a4
Now Black must play S. ... d7-d5 so as to open up the position to fad litate development, but after 9. e5xd6 ~dSxd6 10. I:l.fl-el
White is clearly better. .~,.. ~'..
..~.:
When White continues with the normal 4. ~a4, Black can hunt the bishop with 4 ...bS S.i.b3 ttJaS, but after the simple 6.0- 0 d 6 7.d4, White's lead in development will make itself felt. 4. ... f7-f5!? Against what is in effect a Jaenisch Deferred, we have the following very strong continuation : e5xd4 5. d2-d4! After S.. .fxe4?! 6.ttJxeS ttJxeS 7.dxeS, Black cannot play 7... c6, attacking the bishop on bS, as occurs in the nonnal ]aenisch, and follow up with a queen check on as after which the pawn on eS fulls. 6. e4-e5! Along the lines of the Falkbeer with reversed colours (see King's Gambit) in which Black has difficulty undermining the eS -pawn. jLfS-c5 6 .... 7. 0-0 ttJgS-e7 S. ~a4-b3
;: Karpov.AnatolY · Kortchnoi. Viktor .
Moscow Candidates' final 19 74 (2 0)
'1.e4 e5 2.ttJf3 ttJc6 3.~b5 a6 4.~a4 15 S.d4 exd4 6.e5 ~c5 7.0-0 'ttJge7 8.~b3 d5 9.exd6 'it'xd6 10.l::te1 h6 J 1.ttJbd2 b5 12.a4 ~b7 13.axb5 axb514.l::txa8+ ~xaS 15.lle6 'tWd7 ; 16.~e2 d3 17.cxd3 WdB 1B.ttJf1 , lleB' 19.ttJg3 ttJd4 20.ttJxd4 .b d4 ' 21.jLe3 ' $.xe3 ., 22.'iYxe3 " .1d5 . 23 ..b d5 ttJxd5 24.l:txeB+ 'iYxeB 25.'ii'd4 'ifd7 26.M ~c8 27.~h2 f4 ;2B.lDe2 'Wf7 29JIYe4 c6 30.lDd4 'iYf6 31.lDxb5 't!Vxh4+ 32.~g1 Wie7 33.ttJd4''iff6 34."'f5+ 'ii'xf5 35.lDxf5 ,ttJb4 36.d4 ttJd3 37.ttJxg7 lDxb2 38.lDfS 'it>d7 39.ttJxh6 ~e6 40.~f1 d5 41.lDfS It>e4 42.lDe7 ~xd4 43.0Jxc6+ ~e4 44.we2 lDc4 45.13+ ' ~d5 46.lDb4+ · 'it>e5 47.lDc2 'l!;>f5 · 4B.~d3lDe5+ 49.d4 ttJg6 50.';t;'d5 .ttJh4 51.ttJe1ttJg6 .. 112·112 83
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
White can solve the problem of the exposed bishop with the radical 5. ~xc6+!? bxc6 6.d4, but after 6 .. .f6!
Ruy lopez Steinitz Defence Deferred 1.c4 e5 2.rl..!f3~~c6 3 ..i.b5 a6
4 .... a4 d6
.1
; '>!
Unlike in the normal Steinitz with 3 ... d6. Black here has a sly tactical motif at his disposal that changes the strategic direction of the whole system. If White continues with the normaI5.d4? I, after 5... b5 6.~b3 fLl xd4 7. fLlxd4 exd4
Black's position is solid. He does not need to fear the weakening of the light squares, as he is the one with the light-squared bishop. This is why White usually proceeds with 5. c2-c3 which is not played - as is often believed - to support the d4 pawn advance, but to give the a4-bishop the escape square c2. Now Black has two continuations that are of a very different nature: A)
he will be forced to sacrifice a pawn with 8.c3: taking back the d4-pawn unthinkingly with 8.'iJVxd4?? loses a piece after 8... c5 9.'Villd5 iLe61O.~c6+ ~d711. 'Villd5 c4. 84
5 ....
f7-f5
The aggressive Siesta Variation, which ambitiously aims to take advantage of the w eakness of the d3 -square.
Ruy Lopez - Steinitz Defence Deferred
6. e4xf5! 7.
~c8xf5
0-0
7.d4 gives Black a comfortable game because of 7... e4. ~f5-d3 7.... 8. J:tf1-e1 £i.f8-e7 9. ~a4-c2 By freeing himself of the annoying intruder, White gains a slight advantage. B)
5 ....
~c8-d7
6. d2-d4 Now Black can prepare the fianchetto with 6... g6 and after 7.0-0 ~g7 SJ:[el tLlge7
intending to trade off the bad bishop with the manoeuvre ... h6, ... tLlg6 and ... ~e7 -g5 . White can frustrate Black's plan with the annoying h4-h5. The other option is to change the nature of the position with 7.d5!? tLlbS S.c4 with a type of Queen's Pawn Opening position in which White can free himself of his bad light-squared bishop.
" .,. Aioriian,Levon ; Yandemirov,Valery '. Sochi tt 2005 (4)
;1.e4 eS 2.tLlf3 tLlc6 3.~bS a6 4.~a4 · 'd6 5.0-01? .it941? 6.h3 h5 7..bc6+; 'bxc6 8.d4 ~xf3 9.1!fxf3 exd410.l1d1 . ~f6i1.1Wb3lbe712Ji·b7l:tc813.c3
he finds himself in a cramped but playable position. Otherwise, he can continue with the classical 6. ... tLlg8-e7
:jjfe5 14.'fVxa6 'tIr'xe4 15.cxd4 'iff5 16.tLlc3 g6 iHle1 Wd718.l1e3 .tg7 :19JU3 ~e6 20..td2 f5 2U%e1 'fVf7 .22 ..t95 l:heS 23.l:tfe3 .tf6 24..bf6 'ifxf6 2S.'iWc4 dS 26.'iYe2l:ra8 27.b3 f4 28.11e6 f3 29.~e3 'iWh4 30.93 ,'fi'xh3 : 31.l:txe7+ llxe7 . 32.'iYxe7+ ·weS 33.'i!Vf8+.t>b7 34.1fxf3 h4 ~ 3S.11e7 l1eS 36.lba4 hX93 37.tLlc5+ ;Wb6 38.'Ii'xg3 "t1i'h5 39.1Wc3 :: 1-0 ~.
.
. Steiner.Endre ; Capablanca.Jose Raul Budapest 1928 (6)
.
11.e4 eS 2.tLlf3lbc6 3~bS a6 4..ta4 d6 5.c3 fS 6.exfS hfS 7.d4 e4 8~g5 .te7 9.tLlh4 .te6 i0_be7. tLlxe7 11.1WhS+ 96 12.'i!Vh6 lbg8 ;'13.'ilff4 ' lbf6 14.lLld2 0-0 1S.0-0 d5 ,16."t1i'gS lbhS 17.1!fxd8 tLlxd8 18.g3 .th3 19.1bg2 · tLle6 20ib3 c6 21.~d1 llae8 22ixhS gxhS 23.f4 h4 24.l:tfe1 hX93 2S.hx93 .txg2 26.<;f;>xg2 . :te7 27.tLlf1 :tg7 2S.Wh1 85
Chess Open inn Essentials - Volume 1 ... :
h5 29.c4 ' tDxd4 30.1:.ed1 tDf3 31.cxd5 h4 32.d6 hxg3 33.Wg2 tDh4+ 34.Wg1 g2 35.tDh2 .t:I.xf4 36.1:.d4 J:d7 37.J:te1 tDf5 3S,Udxe4 l:xe4 39.1:.xe4 1:I.xd6 40.tDf3 1:.g6 41J:l.e5 tDd6 42.J:le2 \t>fS 43.t!.xg2 tlf6 44.tDe5 r:J;e7 45 ..ttf2 46.tDd3 :re3 47.tDf4 tDc44S.b3 tDe5 49.tDg2 .uc3 50.r:te2 cJ;>d6 51 ;cJ;>f1 J:!c1 + 52,';pf2 tDd3+ 53.\t>e3 tDb4 54.a3 tlc3+ 55.cJ;>d411c2 56~J:e1 c5+ 57.cJ;>e4 ttxg2 5S.axb4 1:.g4+ 59.'.tId3 .uxb4 60.~c3 as 61.1:l.a1 b6 62.na2 cJ;>c6 63.11a1 <j;>b5 64J~a2 a4 .65.bxa4+ tlxa4 66.1:I.b2+ J:ib4 67.l~h2 J:!.g4 . 0-1
neG
86
".
.,
Fischer,Robert Ciocaltea.Victor Varna 01 1962 (8)
1.e4 e5 2.tDf3 tDc6 3.~b5 a6 4.14a4 d6 5.c3 ~d76.d4 tDgei 7.il.b3 h6 S.~e2 tDg6 9.~c4 ~f6 [9 ...'ife7 10.dS bS 11.WV e2 tDaS=] 10.d5 b5 11.~e2 tDa5 12.R.d1Yle713.g3 0-0 [13 ... il.h3 14.a4} 14.h4 lUcS11 15...tg51 hxg5 16.hxg5 ~xg5 [16 ... tDf4 17.gxf6 tDxe2 18.fxe7 and the knight is lost] 17.tDxg5 il.xg5 1S.0a3 c6 19.dxc6 ~e6 20.'fi'h5 iLh6 21.Ylg4hg4 22.'ifxg4 tDxc6 23Jld1 . b4 24.tDc4 bxc3 25.bxc3 tDd4 26:tDb6 " 1-0
Ruy Lopez - Archangel and New Archangel Variation
Ruy Lopez Archangel and New Archangel Variation 1.c:4 c5 2. !i f3 !i ,eG 3.~b5
Classical Archangel
s....
~c8-b7
This variation has the plus of forcing White to play n e 1 if he wishes to occupy the centre with d4. The move 7.c3
aG 4 ....i.:.a4 [Lt6 5 .0-0 b5
6 ..ib3
Black's most popular fourth move remains 4 .'/uf6. After 5.0 -0, (those of you who are not crazy about the idea of having to learn a lot of theory should consider 5.d3 or 5:~Ve2) thenormalresponse is 5 ... ~e7, or 5 .. .tUxe4 (the Open Spanish), which we will look at soon. However, the immediate 5 ... b5 is being played more and more, and after 6 ..2.b3, 6 ... it.b7 (the Classical Archangel) or 6,.. ~ c5 (the New Archangel). The two variations are similar, in that they both aim for more active play, even if by nature this involves taking more risks than with the Closed Spanish. Both bishop moves have good and bad points, and it is therefore difficult to decide which of the two is better: especially, as the two variations often cross paths.
is in fact playable, but it amounts to a gambit. The bishop on b7 allows 7...tUxe4! 8.d4 tUa5! 9.~c2 exd4! and Black's position seems to be playable. Therefore, 7.d3 is often played. This robs the b 7-bishop of much of its effectiveness and avoids a lot of theory. However, the critical line remains 7. J:[f1-e1 ~f8-c5 8. c2-c3 d7-dS ~c5-bS
9. d2-d4
J: ~l~~
Nt ~ r~·. 'I
1ii ;~~! .l [I i .l 'i=\Al~i~':' :"' 1~r: tj,\~ j"
8j~; .t. i':~:~
:!:t~
¥1~
~~~
jt3f ~ ~ ~~1 jL l~ ~tf: ttJ >~~ 1""( " '" 'A ' ' ~ '!
~ La'
t
~l!il!
]Ji ttJ ~ ~ ll:1ji
:i!3i ~ b l
;w,
with great strategic tension: White's centre is impressive, but it also runs the risk of collapsing. The ~b6 increases Black's pressure on the centre, but at the same time his kingside is left weakened. 87
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
After the natural 10.~gS, Black can respond with the effective IO ... h6 I I . ~h4 gS!?, or with I I ... ~d7 followed by ... 0-0-0. For this reason White usually reinforces the centre. 10. ~c1-e3 0-0 10... ttJxe4?? loses a piece after 11.d5. 11. ttJb1-d2 h7-h6 To play ... ttJg4 hitting the bishop. 12. h2-h3
d7-d6 7. c2-c3 This line has an advantage over its sister variation: the cS-bishop can go to either b7 or g4, depending on the circumstances. The problem is that White, not having played :tIe I , can use the time saved to make more active moves, such as S. a2-a4!
The modern treatment involves a direct 6. ... ~fS-c5
which puts pressure on the queenside. At this point the most popular move is S. ... J:!.aS-bS even ifS ... ~b7 and S...~g4 are pOSSible. 9. d2-d4 ~c5-b6 10. ttJb1-a3! Now Black sacrifices a pawn with 10. ... 0-0 11. a4xb5 a6xb5 ~cS-g4 12. ttJa3xb5
This move became popular when it was realised that the presumed refutation 7.ttJxeS ttJxeS S.d4 ~xd4 9.~xd4 d6 is in fact nothing special for White.
(or I 2 ...exd4 followed by I 3 .. .~g4) with compensation which is difficult to evaluate.
A strategically and tactically rich position for both sides: the kind that appeals to the contemporary player's taste.
New Archangel
88
Ruy Lopez - Archangel and New Archangel Variation '.,
8.a4 [8.d4 exd4 , 9.cxd4 ~b6 10 .~gS " ii.b7 11.tbc3 tbe7 12.l:tel h6 13.illi4 "'. Leipzig m 1877 (4) gS l'4.~g3 ~f8· 15."'d3 cS 16.eS dxe5 ,1.e4 eS 2lbf3 ttJc6 3~b5 a6 4.b4 17,.L:eS 'it'g7 18.ttJe4 ltxe4 19,'iWxe4 bS S~b3 Ab7 S.O-O gS ,7.e3 Jig7 ttJg6 20.'ii'b7 %:ta7 21.'iWc6 c4 n.i.c2 S.d4 dS 9.~gS ttJ16 10i dS hS ~c7 23 ..tladl ~e7 24.i.xg6 Wxg6 ,11.lUfS 'ii'xf6 12.dxeS dxe5 13.a4 2S.d5 $..xeS 26.tbxeS+ .~g7 '0-0 14.ttJa3 ttJdS 1S..hb7 ttJxb7 27.ttJg6+- Lowenthal-Morphy, london m- l 1859 (1-0, 38)}l:tbS 9.d4 ,16.axb5 axb5 17.ttJxb5 '{WbS 1SlIxaS ;~bS 10.axbS axb5 11.tba3 0-0 JbaS 19.ttJa3 'ii'xb2 20.ttJb1 ttJdS .21.h3 :ra122.ttJfd2 .rla2 23.~g4 'tWbS .' 12.tbxbS ~g4 13.dS · ttJe7 14.~c2 '24.c4 ~b4 2S."'e2 l:tb2 2S.'iWd3 hS tbgS 1S.h3 .bh3 1S.gxh3 ~d7 27.g3 ,$.il6 2S.f4 ~c5+ 29.Wh1 h4 17.e4 1!Vxh3 1S.ttJgS ~g3+ 19.'it'h1 .30:~We3 Ua2 31.fxeS hd2 32.tiJxd2 'i.!Vh4+ 20.~g2 tbf4+ 21 ..txf4 exf4 22.tbh3 9S 23.:a3 tbg4 24J~h1 J:i:a3 33.'iWb2 ttJxc4 ," 34....e2 J:!.xg3 ,3S.ttJxc4 l:tx:h3+ 36.'i,(g2 Ug3+ ttJxf2 '2S.tbxf2 " ~xf2+ 2S.tJJh3 f5 37.~h2 Wg7 3S.eS fxeS 39....b2+ 27.exf5 " 'ifh4+ 2S.'it'g2 \'#'f2+ '>th3:beS 30.':f3 l::te3 31 ..axe3 42.ttJeS 'iWe3 43.'iWhS+ It'g5 'ii'xe3+ 32.tJJg4 hS+ 33.'it>xh5 tJJf7 ,44JWdS+ 'it'hS 45.1i'd1 + ~hS 34.16 .l:hS+ 3S.'if,(g4 WxfS 3S.~e1 '4S.ttJg4+ J:Ixg4 47.'ilhg4 ' 'iWd2+ . tIh4+ 37Jbh4 ~xe1 3S.l::thS+ 'if,(g7 48.~h3 'We3+ 49.11f3 'ife2 1-0 39.J:~h7+tJo>g8 40.~g6 · 1!Vg3+ 41.tJo>fSf3 '. 0-1 '
Anderssen.Adolf Paulsen,Louis "
"
Fischer.Robert . Bisguier,Arthur .
',:', . Schlechter,CarI
Buenos Airei 1970 (12)
"
;"1.e4 eS 2.ttJf3 ttJeS 3.Ab5 as 4.~a4 Chigorin,Mikhail tbf6 5.0-0 b5 S.ltb3 ltb7 7.d4 tbxd4 Berlin 1897 (15) ·S.ttJxd4 exd4 ' 9.e3 tbxe4 10.:e1 · 1.e4 e5 2.ttJf3 tbcS 3.~bS a6 4.~a4 bS S.~b3 ~b7 S.O-O tbfS 7.tbc3 j.,e7 J(.dS 11.ttJd2 ~xh2+ 12.'it>f1 CIS ·13.'it'h5 0-0 14.'iWxh2 dxc3 1S.tb~e4 S.d3 0-0 9.~gS dS10.tbe2 tbhS "dxe4 16.bxe3 e5 ;11..ae3 c4 18.~e2 ',' 11.ii.d2 tJJhS 12.g4 ~16 13.h3 tbd7 \lIIf6 19.':f3 'iWeS .; 20.Uh3 v,wfS 14.ttJg3 ttJc5 1S.~dS tbeS 1S.'lt>h2 21.~e3 .tlad8 22 •.tle1 %:td7 23...\td4 tIbS 17.e3 gS 1S.d4 ttJgS 19.tbxgS XXeS 24J:lhS g5 25.g4 ;; 1-0 ~xg5 20.f4 exf4 21.hf4 hf4 22.Uxf4 'ite7 23.'iWf3 tbdS 24.:f1 ; Vocaturo,Daniele ' tJo>g7 2S.gS~xdS 2S.exdS hS , Godena.Michele 27.Ue4 ~xgS 2S.h4'iWd2+ 29..tle2 Cremona ch-ITA 2006 (7) 'iWxe2+ 30.ttJxe2 f5 31.tbf4 95 32.tbhS+ tJo>gS 33.tbg3 f4 34.'ii'e4+ '1.e4 e5 2.tbf3 tbc6 3.kb5 as 4.~a4 <;f;>f7 3S.'~'h7+ 1-0 tbfS 5.0-0 b5 S.~b3 ~c5 7.e3 d6 . ~
"0
89
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Ruy Lopez Open Variation 1.e4 <:5 2. ~f3 t:.-,c6 3.l:.b5 a6
4 ..i.a4 fd6 5.0-0
~ xc4
14 ... ~e 6 04.. .f5 is rather inaccurate because of 15.~g5 mate!). White is better off. In view of the weak e4-pawn and his more active pieces it is safe to say that Whlte's two minor pieces are stronger than Black's rook and two pawns.
S .. .t2Jxe4 is the Open Spanish, whlch represents one of the most famous chapters in the history of the Spanish. Dr. Siegbert Tarrasch dogmatically declared it to be the only way for Black to obtain a good position. However, though it has always had many supporters, the Open Spanish has never been as popular as the Closed. Its most illustrious modern advocate is the Russo-Swiss champion Viktor Kortchnoi. 6. d2-d4! Attempting to open the e-fUe is without doubt a good idea with an adversary's knight on e4.
The Riga Variation, though sometimes played, is undoubtedly favourable for White: 6 ... exd4 7.I:rel dS S.t2Jxd4 ~d6!? 9.t2Jxc6 ~xh2+! 10.Whl! ~h4 and now 11 .l:txe4+ ! dxe4 12.'iVdS+! 'YWxdS 13.ttJxds+ 'i:t>xdS 14.Wxh2 90
So Black is virtually forced to weaken his queenside. 6. ... b7-b5! 7. ~a4-b3 White threatens the paralyzing S.dxeS and, given that 7... exd4 8. 1:Iel d5 9.ttJc3!! gives a clear advantage to White, Black has litde choice but to play 7. ... d7-d5 8. d4xe5 Now Black has to defend dS.
8. ...
.llc8-e6
We have arrived at the initial position of the Open Spanish.
Ruy Lopez - Open Variation
The black pawn on bS facilitates White's opening of the queenside with a2-a4. The d4-square is often occupied by the f3 -knight. Generally this is done after c3, ~c2, which puts the adversary's e4-knight under pressure, and lLlbd2-b3 in order to be able to recapture on d4 with the knight or, alternatively, with the c3-pawn, which fixes the weakness on c7. In addition the move lLlf3-d4 clears the way for White's kingside pawn majority and the pawn advance f4-fs can be devastating. Needless to say, Black has his resources. His pieces are active, the eS-pawn is weak, and his counter play against f2 could become unpleasant, especially after .. .f6, which opens the f-file for a rook. At this point White can choose between three main alternatives: 9.'iVe2, 9.lLlbd2, and 9.c3.
A)
9. ~d1-e2
14. 'lI¥e2xe3 ~d8-b81 The pin is broken by the counterattack onb2. 15. ~c4-b3 ttJc6-a5 Black has sufficient counterplay to maintain equality. B) 9. ttJb1-d2 This is increasingly popular : White does not vacate the c2-square for his bishop for now, but instead immediately attacks the outpost on e4. 9. ... ttJe4-c5 10. c2-c3 if Black takes the bishop on b3, this would leave White with good control of the centre squares. As a result, the thematic move has always been considered to be d5-d41? 10.... even if in the light of recent developments, it may be preferable to play the more prudent 10 ... ~g4. After 10 ... d4, White has at his disposal one of the most important theoretical novelties of recent times : 11. tLlf3-g5!!
The Keres Variation. White clears the d I-square for his rook in order to apply immediate pressure on the dS -pawn. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
...
~f8-e7
~f1-d1
c2-c4!
0-0 b5xc4
~ b3xc4
~e7-c5
~c1-e3
~c5xe3
Thought up by Igor Zaitsev and played for the first time by Anatoly Karpov against Kortchnoi in the 1978 World Championship match, 91
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
this has been considered the best response from that moment on. It received its most famous seal of approval with Kasparov's famous victory over Anand in the 1995 World Championship. The idea is to vacate the f3-square for the white queen, with the threat of tLlxf7. Taking the undefended knight with ';lYd8xg5 11 .... is risky but still considered best: after 12. ~d1-f3 the best thing for Black is to give back the piece with 12. ... 0-0-0 12 .. .'ltod7 13.~d5 ~xd5 14.Wlxd5+ ~d6 15. tLlc4 gives White the advantage. 13. ~ b3xe6+ f7xe6 14. ~f3xc6 WiYg5xe5 15. b2-b4 'iYe5-d5 e6xd5 16. 'iYc6xd5 17. b4xc5 d4xc3 18. ttJd2-b3 d5-d4 19. ~c1-a3!
.t '8 &4J& 8
1:
,.,2:
The line previously thought to be safer, 11. .. dxc3, has been refuted by Kasparov: after 12.tLlxe6 fxe6 13.bxc3 Wld3, he found the brilliant 14.~c2!! 'iVxc3 1S.tLlb3!
and White's attack cannot be fought off. C) 9. c2-c3 The standard move that clears the c2 -square for the bishop and exerts influence on the d4-square .
/"
\,<'.
,
t..
;,
,,".
~
;¥
'~:;',
88 IS n<;t;
and although the earliest games from this position seemed to suggest that Black's mass of pawns is not sufficient compensation for the piece, more recent examples like DelchevGyimesi, Nova Gorica 2004, and 92
Morozevich-Ponomariov, Biel 2004, suggest that a draw is the most likely outcome.
Now Black, as is often the case in the Spanish, has to decide whether to place the bishop solidly on e7 or aggressively oneS .
Ruy Lopez - Open Variation C1)
i.f8-e7 10. ctJb1-d2 First 10 ..iLe3, and then ctJbd2, is also interesting. 0-0 10.... 10 ... ctJc5 1 1..~.c2 i.g4!? is interesting. 11. il.b3-c2 Ousting the black knight from e4. 11. ... f7-f5 12. ctJd2-b3 'ti'd8-d7 13. ctJf3-d4
9 ....
10. ctJb1-d2 10.'iVd3, followed by 1 Lte3, is increasingly popular. 10. ... 0-0 11. il.b3-c2
Now Black has to decide what to do with the e4-knight: support it with 11...f5 or with 11.. .i.f5, or, alternatively, take the pawn on f2!!
A common move. Now 13 ... tbxe5 is too risky (14.f3!), and therefore 13. ... ctJc6xd4 14. ctJb3xd4 c7-c5 15. ctJd4xe6 ~d7xe6 16. f2-f3 ctJe4-g5 17. a2-a4 and Black's impressive-looking centre is probably more of a weakness than a strength. C2) il.f8-c5 9. This is the most played, and probably the move which is most in the spirit of the Open Spanish, even if it is not necessarily the strongest reply. The price you pay to apply pressure on f2 and have an active position, is that it facilitates the common white manoeuvre tbbl-d2-b3:
C21) 11 .... ctJe4xf2 The controversial Dilworth Variation. Opening experts have always approached this line with suspicion, even though it is one of the few black systems with a performance superior to 50%! 1t seems strange that it could be a good idea to give up two more active minor pieces for a rook and a pawn. 12. Uf1xf2 f7-f6! Black can only obtain adequate counterplay by opening the f-file: 13.exf6 i.xf2 +! 14 S~?xf2 ~xf6 and now we see the point: Black's pressure is such that White usually concedes a pawn to open up the game with 15. tbfl ctJe5 16 .jLe3 .l:[ae8 1 7. Wg 1, and now the endgame that follows after 17 .. .tbxf3+ 18.~xf3 'l:'fxf3 19.9xf3 J:!.xf3
93
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
is only favourable to White in theory: in practice Black's results are extremely good. This is presumably because it is easier to push a mass of passed pawns forward than to achieve a harmonious coordination of White's minor pieces. jle6-fS C22) 11 .... The most played of the three alternatives in modern times. 12. tiJd2-b3 White threatens to gain a piece. 12. ... ~fS-g6! Black does not fear conceding the loss of his dark-squared bishop. 13. tiJf3-d4! After 13. tiJxc5 tiJxc5, the black knight heads for e6 with excellent control of the critical squares d4 and c5. 13.... ~cSxd4! It pays not to be too dogmatic. At times it is okay to give up the dark-squared bishop. 14.c3xd4 14.tiJxd4 ~d7! produces a balanced game. Instead, 14... tiJxd4? I, after which there is no further counterplay on a lDb3, leaves White with the advantage after 15.cxd4, while 14... lDxe5? loses to 1514 with the idea of 16.f5. 14. ... a6-aS! 94
As in some variations of the Closed De-
fence to the Spanish, Black obtains counterplay with ... a5-a4, speculating on the presence of the white knight on b3: 1S. ~c1-e3 as-a4 16. tiJb3-c1 If 16.lDd2 is played, then 16 ... f6!? is interesting; as is indeed 16 ... a3!? 17 .b3 f6 with possibilities for both players. f7-f5 C23) 11 .... The classical continuation. Nowadays it is very rare, but this is a question of fashion, not objective inferiority, given that there are no known refutations. After 12.exf6 lDxf6, Black has good piece play, and for this reason the following standard manoeuvre is preferred: 12. tiJd2-b3 ~cS-b6 13. tiJf3-d4! tiJc6xd4 14. tiJb3xd4
Ruy Lopez - Open Variation
and once again Black concedes the bishop in exchange for the initiative . 14. ... iLb6xd4! At this pOint, in the past the critical variation, which contains an incredible hidden Black sacrifice, was IS.cxd4 f4!.
Positionally forced: Black, who must play actively, threatens 16 ... f3 . White occupies this square first with 16.f3 tlJg3! 17.hxg3 fxg3 . The question now is: how do you defend yourself against the threat of .. :iVd8-h4-h2 mate? The answer is 18 :~Hd31 ~fS (18...~h419:JJVxh7+ with an advantage for White) 19:~xfS J:(xfS
20.£l.xfS 'iYh4 21. £l.h3 and mate has been prevented, but at the cost of two central pawns: 21...~xd4+ 22.'it>hl 'MUxeS .
The strange make-up of the opposing forc es is something that you do not see every day: queen and three pawns against rook and two bishops. Who is better off? This line was first played in 1942, and no one is really any the wiser after more than 60 years! There is an interesting story relating to this variation: The theory until the move 16 .. .t2Jg3 was well-established as early as 1904 and many noted players (Cohn, Maroczy, Tarrasch, Vidmar) adopted it as Black. However, Isaac Boleslavsky was the first to appreciate the potential of 17 .hxg 3! (previously considered to be losing) followed by the queen sacrifice: h e played this variation against Ragozin in1942 (1-0) as well as Botvinnink in 1943 ('/2- '/2). Two years later in 1945, a radio match was organized as part of the end-of-war celebrations: 10 Soviet players against 10 from the USA in a double-round match. The convincing win by the Soviets came as a great surprise: IS'/2-4'i2. On second board Vasily Smyslov found himself facing Samuel Reshevsky. In their first game Smyslov had the white pieces, and Reshevsky allowed him to employ this very variation, which was so well known to the Soviet players and completely unknown to the Americans. As a result Smyslov was able to beat his formidable opponent with unusual ease. This demonstrates how slowly news of chess developments spread in the days before the Internet. It is understandable that White would want to seek an advantage without all these fireworks. With this in mind, it may be better to turn to 95
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
1S. ~d1xd4! (instead of 1S.cxd4) 1S. ... 16. ~d4-d1!
Keres,Paul Reshevs.ky,Samuel . e7-eS
16. ... fS-f4 17. f2-f3 Now the same manoeuvre 17.Ji::Jg3? is no longer playable because at the end of the sequence there is no undefended pawn on d4, and therefore Black has to make do with 17. ... lLle4-gS 1S. a2-a4 White's position is more promising.
Smyslov,Vasily Sokolsky,Alexey Moscow Chigorin mem 1947 (14)
1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3 h7 2S.
The Hague/MoscoW Wcb. 1948 (18) 1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 bS 41.f4 '; 0-1 i
Smyslov,Vasily Euwe,Max The Hague/Mo;c0w Wch 1948 (19)
\ 1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3 lLle6 3.Ab5 as 4.~a4 ~ ;~
Fischer,Robert Ree,Hans
~ N~~anya 1968 '(7) .1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3
Ruy Lopez - Open Variation 1S.~gS
·.
."".
,
ttJaS17.'iWxeS+ 'itxeS ~xd5 19.1:txdS ' .bc3 20.J:tc1itb4 21.l:txc7 l:!.acS 22.lla7 J:tc2 23.l:!.dd7 itc3 24.J:tac7 hS 2S ..i.e3 1-0
Mainz rapid 2004) 28 ....tf8!-+) 28 ...J:tdbS 29.ita3 'itxa6 30.'tt>f2!oo] 23 ...c2 24.ttJxd2 [H,hd2? i.xal 25.a7 Wb7 26Jhal :l.d3 27.tt~a5+ 'ii;>a8 28.tZJc4 l:td4-+] 24 ....ba1 j; 25.l:I.xa1 l:theS 2S.tlc1! (26.c6? wb8 , Kasparov,Garry 27J:tcl rte4! 28 ...i.c3 J:tc4 29.l:I.xc2 l:[d3 30.lib2+ <;ta8! 31..i.a5 J:tcl + A,nand.VisWanathan , New York Wch m 1995 (lO) 32.tt~f1 rtddH Gild. Garda-V.Mikhalevski, Montreal' 200'4; 26.a7!? 'ii;>b7 1.e4 eS 2.ttJf3 ttJcS 3 ..tbS as 4.ita4 ,lbf6 S.O-O ttJxe4 S.d4 b5 7...tb3 d5 ' 27.a8\1i'+ l:%xa8 28.licl %-%De1chev~ ',8.dxeS 'A eS 9.0.bd2 0.cS 10.c3 d4 Gyimesi. Nova Gorica 2004] 2S ...lie4 ,11.lbgSI? dxc3 ,;. 12.0.xeS fxeS 27,~c3 l:tc4 2S.r:.xc2 r:.d3 29.J:tb2 (29.l:ta2?! 'ii;>b8 30,itaSl:tc1+ 31.tZJf1 13.bxc3 l'id3 14.itc211 ( fixc3 : 15.lbb3 tZJxb31S ..bb3 tZJd417.'iVg4 · :tIddl 32 .g3 lixfl+ 33.<;t>g2 l:[g1+ ,'i¥xa1 18..be6 l:[dS19~h61 'iVc3! 3Hti'f3 l:txc5 35 ..Si.d2] 29...l:[cxc3 , 20..bg7 'ii'd3 21 ;bhS 'iVg6 22.iLf6 30,a7 l:[a3 31.r:.bS+ .t>d7 32.aS'iV l:[xaS 33JlxaS l:txd2 ['12-'12 Kiilaots"ite7 23 ..be7 ..-xg4 24 ..bg4 wxe7 25.l1c11 . cS 26.f4 as 27.<M2 ' a4" Rytshagov. Finland tt ' 2004/0S] 34.g4 .t>cS 3S..t>g2 .t>xcS 3S.~g3 ·' l:rd7 2S:>ite3 b429.itd1! a3, 30.g4+lId5 31.lIc4 " cS 32.'it~4 l:[dS 37.f4 wd4 3S..I:1a1l:[f7 39.l:!.d1 + 'ii;>e3 ,40.l:[eH .t>d4 41.l:rdH 1h-Y2 33Jbc5 tZJeS 34.tldS , lieS 35.fS '.i:c4+ 36.we3 t2lcS 37.g5 lic1 3S.J:tdS 1-0
~ 1S.bdS
"
Morozevich.Alexander Ponomariov,Ruslan ,';
Metger,Johannes .• Tarrasch,Siegbert .. ' Frankfurtch-GER 1887 (13)
2004 (10) ' : ' " 1.e4 e5 Vbf3 tZJc6 3...tbS a6 4.ita4 : 1.e4 e5 2.tZJf3 tZJc6 3..ltbS a6 4~a4 lLlf6 5.0-0 ttJxe4 6.d4 b5 7.~b3 d5 . tZJf6 S.O-O tiJxe4 S.d4 b5 7.iLb3 dS 'S.dxe5 ite6 9.c3 itc5 10.itf4 g5 ' S.dxe5 .i.e6 9.tZJbd2 ttJc5 10.c3 d4 11.~e3 .be3 12.fxe3 ,g4 13.tZJd4 '11.tbgS 'iVxgS 12.'iff3 0-0-:0 tiJxeS " 14.tZJd2 tZJcS 1S.'iVe1 0-0 : 13~xe6+ fxe6 , 14.1¥xcs 'iVxeS 1S.'iVg3l'ig5 17.llae1 tZJcd31UI.e2 ,1S.b4 'iVd5 16.'ii'xd5 exd5 17.bxcS c5 19.tZJ4f3 .l'ig7 20.tZJxe5 'iVxe5 ; dxe3 1S.tZJb3 d4 19•.lta3 g6 20,jLb4 ., 21.l'ixe5 tZJxe5 22.e4· d4 23.cxd4 .ltg7 21.a4 d31 22.axb5 ['h-Vl . exd4 24..be6 fxeS 2S.tZJb3 ~xf1+' : Grischuk-Anand, Wijk aan Zee 2005) 2S.'~xf1 l:[f8+ 27.e1 lbd3+ 22 ...d2 23.bxa6 [23.c6?! 'ii;>bS 2S.~d2 tZJf4 29.1::.12 eS 30.tZJe5 rteS 24..rladl J:[d5 (24...axbS 2S.tZJc5 J:!:d5 31.lbd7 d3 32.lbfS+ 'iPg7 33.tZJxg4 ·' 26.tiJa6+ WcS 27.tZJc5 D.28.l:tal::::) ~c2+ 34.we1 tZJxg2+ 35.Wf1 d2 :· 25.bxa6 l:I.hdS ' 26.tZJa 1 'i;;a7 27.tZJc2 ,', 3S.~e2 h5 37.'ii;>d1 J:[xb2 3S..uxg2 tl.b8 2S.f4! (2S.rtbl? (Shirov-Anand; ' ': rtbH 39,<,tixd2l:[b2+ 0-1 , . BieJ
97
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I .,
~;:.:
~,
....
."
.' '" ..... ...... '
'
:--
46.:lg3 h6 47.l:lh4 Wh7.4B.<;ph2 f5 49.~e3 'ilfc6 50~f4 tIdS S1.~eS 'liib7 , 52.~e6 ," J:l.fS 53 ..tf4 ~g7 Moscowl942 ' 1.e4 e5 VDf3 tZlc6 3.~b5 a6 4..b4 54.l:txg7+ ~xg7 " 55 ..tb3 " J:.d8 tZlf6 5.0-0 tZlxe4 6.d4 b5 7..1tb3 d5 56.oieS+ Wg6 57.l:td4 ,n e8 5S.:tf4 J:!:e1 59.J:l.d6+ wg7 ' 60..txh6+ ~h7' B.dxe5 ~e6 9.c3 .tc5 10.tZlbd2'O-0 11~c2 f5 12.1Db3 .ta7 13.tZlbd4 61 ..tg5 l:tb1 62 ..tc2 ltc163 ..bf5+' tZlxd4 ,14.tZlxd4 .bd4 15.cxd4 f4 :. ~g7 64.J:l.d7+ , Wf8 65 ..bd2 cxd2 ' 66.J:l.xd2 b3 67.:ldB+ We7 6S.lIaS ' ' 16.f3 tZlg317.hxg3 fxg31S.~d3 ~f5 lla1 69.g4 Wf6 70.l:tb8a4 71.i:Ib4 19.'tWxf5 l:txf5 20..bfS 'ilfh4 21.Ah3 wg5 72.~g2 :: <M6 73.l:tb6+ <;pe5 'iWxd4+ 22.Wh1 'iWxe5 23 ..td2 C5 24.:lae1 " 'i!kxb2 ' 25 •.tf4 ~f6 74J:rbS+ ~f6 75.J:l.b6+ ~e5 76.l:lb4 ' ~f6 77.wh2 , wg5 ' 78.nb5 llc1 ' 26..bg3 d4 27.l:te6 ~g5 2B.~h2 <::4 "79•.td7+ wf4 BO.~e6l:Ic2+ 81.<j;>h3: 29.f4 1Yh5 30.f5 d3 , 31.16 gxf6 b2 B2 ..ta2 a3 B3.l:lf5+ '~e3 84.tta5 . 32JU5 'ii'g6 33.l:texf6 'iYg7 34..tf4 'c3 3S.1:g5 J:l.dS 36.ii.e6+ ~hS , ttc3 '. 85.~h4 ~f4 s6.:1;i4+ '; ~e5' ,37..ae5 · 1-0 87.g5 lIc1 ' 8SJba3 :ta1 SUtb3: J:[xa2 \ Y2-Y{ "
Boleslavsky:Isaak Ragozin,Viacheslav
Boleslavsky,Isaak Botvinnik,Mikhail
Sverdlovsk 1943 (II)
" ' Smyslov,Vasily Reshevsky,Sam.uel
.. ,'
'Ii
'( "~
1.e4 e5 V Df3 tZlc6 3..tb5a6 4..b4 USA-URS radio m 1945 (I) . . . . ] tZlf6 5.0-0 tZlxe4 6.d4 b5 7.:ib3 d5 1.e4 e5 2.tbf3 tZlc6 3..tbs' a6 4.h4~ 8.dxe5 .ie6 9.c3 .tc5 10li:Jbd2 '0-0 " .',tZlf6 :S.o-0 ,.tbxe4 6:d4 bS 7.Ab3 d5' B.dxe5 i.e6 9.c3 .ic510.tZlbd2 0-0 11..tc2 f5 12.tZlb3 .tb6 13.tZlbd4 ' tZlxd4 14.ttJxd4 .bd4 15.cxd4.' f4 11.Ac2 " f5 12.tZlb3 .tb6 :·13.tZlbd4 .16.f3 tZlg317.hxg3 txg31S.'i¥d3 .ifS It:lxd4 ,14.tbxd4 ' ~xd4 1S.cxd4 f4 ; 19.'li'xfS nxf5 20.,bf5 "ith4 21 •.th3 16.f3tZlg3 17:hxg3 f)(g3 18.'tWd3 ~f5 'itxd4+ 22.Wh1 \'lfxe5 23 ..td2 ·'c5 " 19.'ffXf5 :xf5 20•.txf5 'ii'h4 21.i1.h3' ' 24Jlae1 'iYxb2 25 •.tf4 d4 26 .•bg3 'ii'xd4+ 22,<;!"h1 'ffxe5 23..td2 ~xb2' ' d3 27..ie5 , 'lWxa2 28..td6 'iWb2 24..tf4: c5 25ie6+ whB 26..1bdS. 29.~e6+<j;>h8 30.i.e5 ~d2 31.f4 c4 " J:[dB 27.l:tad1' c4 2Bbg3 c3 29..te5 : 32.f5 :lfB 33.l:te4 c3 · 34JIef4 :a6 . b4 3O.il.b3 1:[d2 31.f4 h5 32.:lb1 J:l.f£ .35.1:[4f2 'ii'h6+ 36.Wg1 b4 ' 37JU333.1I~e1 ~d2 34.lIbdHIYb2 35.lIdB+' d2 3B~b3 'ili'h4 39.l:ld3 :UB 40.1:g3 .. <.t>h7 ;:36..tgB+ <;Pg6 37JId6+ f.W5 ,'ite7 '41.~d4 lU6 42.J:l.e3 'iWd7 '" '> 3S.Ae6+ '. Wg6 . 39..td5+ . Ii.Ihi 43.1:[f4 a5 44.1:tfe4 J:tfB 45.f6 gxf6 .. " 40..te4+ Ii.IgB.. 41:.tg6 1-o' '".'"" ",.. ,. ',", ""'... . , ." .' '.:c
"~
98
,:.,
,'
~
.~"
",,,,- ,',
"
•
",
...
.
e
"".
.'
,~
Minor Variations after 5 .. . ~ e7
Ruy Lopez with 3 ...a6 Minor Variations after 1.e2-t!4 e 7-t!5 2." 9 1-f3 !i ·b8-c6 3.JiLf1-b5 a7-a6 4.~b5-a4 ~g 8-f6 5.0-0 ';"f8-c7
Black's most frequently played response to the fifth move in the above sequence is S...ll.e7 , after which his threat to take on e4 becomes real. In addition to the main continuation 6. :!:i:.e 1, which defends e4, White can also choose from several interesting alternatives :
7. ~a4-b3 d7-d6 White has a flexible position: he can either play on the queenside with a4 or move the bI-knight to g3 by way of d2 and fl; or he can also slowly prepare the occupation of the centre with c3 and d4. The game is characterized by a slow positional struggle with opportunities for both sides; at times transposing to the Anti-Archangel, or the Anti-Marshall, in which White plays the solid d3. C) 6. d2-d4 opens the game, but Black has nothing to fear: 6 .... e5xd4 7. J:.f1-e1 Or 7.eS t/Je4 8.t/Jxd4 t/Jxd4 9.~xd4 t/JcS 1O.4:lc3 O-O! with equality. 7. ... b7-b5 8. e4-e5!? 8 .~b3 d6 9 .~dS (9.t/Jxd4?? loses a piece after 9.. .t/Jxd4 1O.'iflxd4 c5 and 11...c4) 9 ... t/JxdS 10 .exdS t/Je5 11. t/Jxd4 with equality. 8. lLlc6xe5! 9. l:ie1xe5 d7-d6!
A) 6. lLlb1-c3 Playable, but it lacks bite. It is more enterprising in the Ruy Lopez to occupy the centre with c3 and d4 and develop the knight with the moves t/Jd2 -fl-g3, with good prospects on the kingside. 6. ... b7-b5 7. ~a4-b3 d7-d6 The position is balanced. B) 6. d2-d3 Less innocuous than it appears. 6. ... b7-b5
and Black does not have any problems; indeed he has the advantage of the two bishops. 99
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume D) 6. "i¥d1-e2 The so-called Worrall Attack. White defends e4 with the queen so the rook can have the dl-square, thus making the pawn moves to c3 and d4 more effective. This plan is highly logical and dangerous, and Black's best way to counter would seem to be to play in the spirit of the Marshall: 6. b7-bS 7. .Iil.a4-b3 0-0
8. c2-c3 d7-d5!? At this point, 9.exd5 seems to be dangerous because of 9....I1l.g4!, the idea being 10.dxc6 e4. Therefore White falls back on 9.d3, and after 9 ... J:!:e8 I O.ttJbd2 ~f8 11. J:rel (to make the fI -square available for the knight) 11 .. ..I1l.b7, we have reached a middle game position with equal possibilities for both players : White has some kingside prospects, while Black has good central control. E) 6 . .b4xc6 The most popular of the minor variations, and is called the Exchange Varia-
100
tion Deferred by some. It seems to go against common sense to take on c6 after having lost a tempo with the retreat to a4. However, in comparison with the exchange on the 4th move, the situation is different. 6. ... d7xc6 The knight on f6 and the bishop on e7 are not particularly active, whereas in the normal Exchange Variation these pieces are usually developed effectively by going respectively to g6 via e7, and to d6. The consequence of this is that Black also has to lose tempi in order to harmonize his position.
However, after 7. d2-d3 lLlf6-d7 8. lLlb1-d2 0-0 f7-f6 9. lLld2-c4 lLld7-cS 10. lLlf3-h4 Black still maintains equality. It should be stressed that the percentage of draws with this variation is unusually high, and thus it could be an optimal choice for white players against stronger opponents.
Ruy Lopez - Marshall Attack
Ruy lopez Marshall Attack 1.e4 e5 2.-i f3 "',c6 3 ..i.b5 a6
4.i.a4 '!.,f6 5,0-0 1..e7 6 .!fel b5 7 ..i.b3 0-0 8.c3 d5
.:.;.:
t,O"
With 6.l:te I , White has defended the e4-pawn and made the threat of ~xc6 and then lLlxeS real. Apart from the rare 6 ... d6, which is along the lines of the Steinitz Deferred, Black almost always proceeds with 6 ... b5, and after 7 .~b3 he has two possibilities: I) To head into the so-called Closed Spanish with ... d6 and ... 0-0 (or Hrst .. .0-0 and then .. ,d6); 2) To continue ambitiously after 7... 0- 0 8.c2-c3, playing Frank Marshall's idea: the aggressive move 8 ... d7-dS!? Black sacriHces the eS-pawn for a strong attack against the white king. The story goes that Marshall kept the idea of this pawn sacriHce secret for years, saving it up for a future encounter with Capablanca. He played it against him (New York 1918) in the hope of ruining the young Cuban's
growing reputation . However, Capablanca met the prepared variation with sangfroid. He found the best moves over the board, 'refuting' the surprise weapon and winning. The refutation was so convincing that the original move of the American player II ... tt:lf6 has now been replaced by lI ... c6, as suggested by the very same Marshall 20 years after this lost encounter! Almost one hundred years of attempting to refute the Marshall have not borne fruit. Indeed, the results of hundreds of games demonstrate that the Marshall Attack is one of Black's best systems. Certainly the fordng nature of the line, in which a good memory is more important than creative play, is not to all black players' tastes. It also does not appeal to some because there are various lines in which White can force an early draw. As a consequence, this aggressive gambit is ironically seen by many professional players as a good way to get a draw against players of their own strength, while preferring the Closed Spanish when looking for a win against weaker players. However, we should take one step back:
101
Chess Opening Essential s - Volume I
There are many white players who do not enjoy playing against the Marshall. Among these is Garry Kasparov, who after 7 ... 0-0 always chose one of the so-called Anti-Marshall lines: i.e. a variation in which White does not play 8.c3, and therefore the ...dS advance is less appealing. The most traditional Anti-Marshall line begins with 8.a4 (even if in the first years of the new millennium there has been a shift towards 8.h3 ~b7 9.d3). During the 1990s, the most popular response to the a4 pawn advance was 8 ...~b7 9.d3 d6, notwithstanding that after 10.to bd2!
7 ... 0-0, reserving the possibility of the Marshall, and if White plays unsuspectingly he can continue normally with 8 ... d6. If instead Black prefers the positions ariSing from the closed systems and does not like the Anti-Marshall systems, he will usually play 7 ...d6 .
(Kasparov's move) White's win rate was good. However, also in this case opinions have changed, and the alternative move 8 ...b4!? is becoming more popular, even if in the past it was considered to be a move of dubious quality. Another quick look at some of the subtle psychology that occurs in practical modern chess: as already stated, those intending to play the Closed Spanish can play 7 ...d6 and 8 ... 0-0 in any order they like. However, if Black likes the pOSitions that arise by employing Anti-Marshall lines , he can set off a smokescreen by beginning with
The dS-knight is en prise and needs to be either moved or defended, after which the white rook will be exposed, which facilitates Black's counterplay. When the variation was first introduced, 11 ...tLlf6 was exclusively played. However,after 12.d4 ~d6 13 J:tel ~g4 14.h3 ~h4 IS. ~f3! tLlxf2!? 16 .~d2 ! , or 16.J:r.e2! (the move found by Capablanca over the board), experts agree that White has a clear advantage. II ... ~b7 is not often played, even if after 12 :~f3 ~d6! 13 .~xdS! c6! 14.J:l.e2 cxdS IS.d4 'iVc7, Black has gained some positional compensation.
102
Let's see what happens after 9. e4xd5
~f6xd5
9... e4?! has not stood the test of time. 1O. ~f3xe5 ~ c6xe5 11. J:!e1xe5
Now we have the initial position of the Marshall Attack.
Ruy Lopez - Marshall Attack 11 ....
c7-c6
By far the most popular move, and objectively the best. It has been used since the end of the 1930s - after Marshall first played his attack it took some twenty years to find the best move! In our age of the Internet and Fritz it could take as little as 20 minutes! 12. d2-d4
12.d3 prepares the lines in which White plays l:!.e4. This is not often played, but the results with it are encouraging. 12.... ~e7-d6 13. J:i.e5-e1 'iiVd8-h4 14·92-93 Black's attack is obviously too strong after 14.h3? ~xh3. 14. ... 'iWh4-h3
Black has an obvious initiative against the weakened position of the castled white king. For years, at this point people have almost exclusively played 15 . ~e3 ~g4 16.'iYd3 (the only option, to be able to return to f1 after ... ~f3) 16 .. Jiae8 17.tLld2 J::te6 - in some lines this is a preparation for a transfer to h6 - 18.a4. White seeks counterplay on the queenside, and now, after 18 ... bxa4, 18 ... 'iYh5 or 18 ... f5, we reach highly theoretical po-
sitions on which we have yet to hear the last word. However, the general opinion is that the positions are dynamically balanced. Recently, in the diagrammed position the move 15. l:!.e1-e4!?
has become quite popular. The idea is to get rid of the intruder on h3 with the follow-up .!:Ih4. Black prevents this with 15 .... 97-95! This pawn cannot be captured, because after 16.~xg5 'ViIifS Black will win one of the two undefended white pieces. 16. 'iYd1-f3 ~c8-f5
The usual follow-up.
Here White makes an energetic exchange sacrifice with 17. ~b3-c2! Black can either accept this or refuse with 17 ... ~f4!? After either of these options the position is difficult to assess. Even after this short introduction you have probably already realized that the Marshall is alive and kicking. It is therefore fully understandable why many white players try to avoid it altogether. 103
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 34.~g2 tbh2 35.c4+ ~gS 36.'ii'd1 f3+ 37.~xg3 fig4+ 3S.litf2 , ~ M+ , 39.'it;>e3 . ~f4+ .40.>t>d4 . 'it'e5+ . 41.'it'e3 · tbg4+ 42.w d2 'il'xb2+. 43.'fic2 'ii'xa1 44.11g6+ 'it'h7 . 0-1 4S.J:Ixg4f2
Capablanca,Jose Raul Marshall,Frank .,;. : New York 19 I 8
1.e4 eS 2.tb f3 tbc6 3..tbS a6 4.~4 tbf6 S.O-O Ji.e7 6.lie1 bS 7~b3 0-0 S.c3 d5 9.exdS tbxdS 10.tbxeS tbxeS 11Jl xeS tbfG 12.l:!.e1 ~d6 13.h3 tbg4 14.flf3 'ii'h4 1S.d4 [15 .hxg+ Ah2+! 16 .•t>fl h g+ 17 .~e+ ~f+! IS.g3 'ii'h2 19.J:Le3 ltaes 20.'iWdS h g3! 21·.J:hg3 (21.~xf7+ ~hS!) 2L.Ji.e2+ 22.~e l i.f3+-+] 1S ...tbxf2 · ,16.lte2 [16.~d2!] 16...i.g417.hxg4 [17.'fkxfl Ji.g3 lS.'t!ffl he2 19.'ihe2 llaeS':"'+] 17...~h2+ 1S.<;f;(f1 !i1.g3 19.11xf2 'il'h1+ . 20.'it>e2 iLxf2 21.i.d2 ~h4 22.'i'h3 llaeS+ 23.~d3 \\I'f1 + 24.~c2 Af2 2S.1Yf3 'il'g1 26.AdS c5 27.dxcS ~xcS 2S.b4 ~d6 29.a4 as 30.axbS axb4 31.1:[a6 bxc3 32.tbxc3 Ji.b4 33.b6 .bc3 34..b c3 h6 3S.b7 l:l:e3 36..bf7+ [36 ...l:l:xf7 (3 6...~h7 37.'iWf5+ IithS 3S.l:txh6X) 37.bS'tlV+ ~h7 3S.l:txh6+ 'it;>xh6 (3S ...gxh6 39.'t1ixf7X) 39.'iYhS+ ~g6 40.Vi'h5X] 1-0
Polgar,Judit Adams,Michael Dos Hennanas 1999 (6)
1.e4 eS 2.tbf3 tbc6 3.Jt.bS a6 4.i.a4 tbf6 S.O-O Ae7 6Jle1 bS 7..ltb3 0-0 S.c3 dS 9.exdS tbxdS 10.tbxeS tbxeS 11.,UxeS c612.d3 ~d613.I1e1 'fih4 14.g3 'iYh3 .1S.n e4 flfS 16.tbd2 'iYg6 17.J:[e1 fS 1S.Vfkf3 ~hS 19.~d1 f4 20.g4 hS 21.h3 tbf6 22.'fig2 hxg4 23.hxg4 .bg4 24.I1e6 '!1VhS 2s ..b g4 tbxg4 26Jbd6 llaeS 27.tbe4 tbeS 2S.f3 tbxf3+ 29.',t>f2 tbM 30.'iWh1 gS 31.b4 g4 32~b2 g3+ 33.~g1 tbf3+ 104
..
Kotronias', Vasilios ,
Beliavsky,Alexander Istanbul Ech 2003 (3) . 1.e4 e5 2.tbf3 tLlc6 3~b5
a6
4.~a4
tbf6 S.O-O !i1.e7 6.l1e1 bS 7.~b3 0-0
S.c3 d5 9.exdS tbxd5 10.tbxe5 tbxe5 1Ulxe5 c6 12.d3 .id6 13Jle1 ~h4 14.g3 fl h315.l:Ie4 1!tf516.tbd2 flg6 17.l:te1 f5 1S.f4 ii.xf4 19.'i'f3 i.b8 20..b d5+ cXd5 21.tbb3 .ltb7 22.~f4 .txf4 23.'iYxf4 d4 24.tbxd4 l:ae8 25.IlxeS 'iYxeS 26.'it>f2 ~f7 27.1:e1 h6 2S.Ue2 i¥dS 29.~e1 'iYxa2 30.tbe6 IU7 31.tbdS . " . 1-0 't
,
Leko,Peter ~and.Viswanathan Cap d'Agde rapid 2003 (3) 1.e4 eS 2.tbf3 tbc6 3 .~bS
,
a6 4.i.a4 · tbf6 5.0-0 ii.e7 6 ..!:le1 bS 7.!iLb3 0-0 S.c3 dS 9.exd5 tbxd5 . 10.tbxe5 tbxe511.tl.xeS c6 12.tl.e1 jt,d613.g3 !iLfS 14.d4 ~d7 15..te3 " l:!.ae8 16.tbd2 .tg4 17.~c2 £tfS1S.'iVc1 h5 19.tbf3 ~g4 20.tbh4 .tIe6 21 ..ltd1 fS 22 ..b g4 hxg4 23~gS f4 24.'iYd2 lUeS 25.Uxe6 'i!Vxe6 26.gxf4 . ~e2 27.f5 ~e4 2S.1:1f1 .\tf4 29.!i1.xf4 tbxf4 ' 30.f3 gxf3 31.tbxf3 JUS 32.'iWe1 'iixf5 33.'it'h1 'iWh3 34.'fif2 tbh5 35.'it;>g1 J:tf4 36.'+l!'e3 'ii'g4+ 37.'ii'h1 tbg3+ 3S.hxg3 fih3+ 39.~g1 'ii'xg3+ 40.'it'h1 Uh4+ 41.tbxh4 ~xe3 42.tbg2 'fke2 43.l:l:f5 ~xb2 44.llc5 fixa2 45Jl xc6 a5 0-1
RUy Lopez - Marshall Attack
KuZmin.Gennady Malinin. Vasily Sudak 2002 (9)
1.e4 eS 2.t2Jf3 t2JcS 3.~bS as 4.~a4 t2JfS S.O-O Ji..e7 SJ:te1 bS 7.~b3 0-0 S.c3 dS 9.exdS t2JxdS 10.t2JxeS t2Jxe51U!.xeS cS12.d4 ~dS13.I1e1 '¥ih4 14:g3 ' ,*,h315~e3 ; Ji..g4 1S.'ii'd3 I1aeS ,17.t2Jd2 I1eS 1S.c4 ~f4 19.cxd5 I1hS 20.'lie4 '¥ixh2+ 21.~f1 ~xe3 22.J::xe3 I1f6 0-1
Ponomariov.Ruslan Anand, Viswanathan Linares 2002 (14)
1.e4' eS 2.t2Jf3 t2JcS 3.~bS as 4 ..b4 t2JfS 5.0-0 ~e7 S.lle1 bS 7~b3 0-0 S.c3 d5 9.exdS t2JxdS 10.t2Jxe5 t2JxeS11JlxeS cS12.d4 i.dS13.I1e1 " '\liYM 14.g3 ~h3 1S.I1e4 9S 1S.'iYe2 fS 17.•b dS+ " cxdS 1SJteS f4 19JIxdS ~g4 20JWf1 'ii'xf1+ 21.~xf1 l:IaeS' 22.~d2 ~h3+ 23.~g1 txg3 24.hxg3 I1e2 2S.~e3 I1xe3 2S.fxe3 Irf1 + 27.';1;h2 g4 2SJbd5 1fz_1f2
Shirov.Alexey Aronian,Levon Moscow Tal Memorial 2006 (4)
1.e4 e5 2.t2Jf3 LUcS 3.~bS as 4 ..aa4 LUIS 5.0-0 .ie7 S.I1e1 b5 7~b3 0-0 S.c3 • d5 '9.exd5 t2Jxd5 10.t2Jxe5 LUxe5 11.I1xeS cS 12.d4 .1tdS 13.I1e1 ~h4 14.g3 'iYh3 15.l:I.e4 95 1SJlff1 ~ h5 17.LUd2 ~f5 ,1S.f3 LUfS 19.a4 LUxe4 20.t2Jxe4 ~gS 21.t2JxdS ~xdS 22.~xg5 'iYgS 23. ~c1 ..td3 24.axb5 axb5 25.I1xaS .!.IxaS 2S.~f2 jlc4 27•.b c4 bxc4 2S:94 lIeS 29 ...tf4 VWd3 30.\t'g3 'tIVe2 31.~b1 'iYe1+ 32:~xe1 Ilxe1 33.~dS Ilg1+ '34.<;t>f2 I1b1 35.it.a3 'ii;g7 3S.<;1;g3 ~gS , 37.h3 h5 3S.~h4? I1g1139.1i.cS J:!.g2 4O..ta3 fS 41.gxh5+ <;t>f5 42.14 UgS 43.~dS 'iPeS 44.hS?! st>xdS 45.';i;>h5 15 4S.h7 I1hS 47.w gS ~e7 4S.Wg7 <;t>eS 49.<;i;>gS 'iPfS 50.h4 <J;;e7 S1.~g7 WeS 52.<;1;9S 'iPIS 53.hS ~e7 54.~g7 ~eSI ' 55s!.'gS wfS 5S.hS WeS'-:+ 57.<;1;f6l:Ixh7 5S.'ii;gS J:[f7 [59.h7 lUs 60.Wg7 .J:ih8 6U~xh8 ~f8 62 .b4cxb3-+] 0-1
Kramnik. Vladimir Leko,Petel' Brissago Wch m 2004 (8)
Svidler.Peter
1.e4 e5 2.t2Jf3 t2JcS 3.i.bS as 4..ia4 Leko.Peter t2JfS S.O-O ~e7 SJ:te1 b5 7.~b3 0-0 Morelia/Linares 2007 (5) S.c3 d5 9.exdS t2Jxd5 10.t2Jxe5 1.e4 e5 2.LU13 LUcS 3.~bS as 4.it.a4 t2JxeS11.I1xe5 cS12.d4 ~dS13.:e1 LUfS S.O-O §;.e7 U[e1 bS 7.~ b3 0-0 " S.c3 ' dS 9.exd5 t2Jxd5 10.t2JxeS ~h4 14.g3 '\liYh3 15J:te4 95 1S.'\liYf1 'tIt'h5 17.t2Jd2 ~J5 1S.f3 t2Jf6 19Jire1 LUxeS 11.J:Ixes cS 12.d4 ..tdS 13J~e1 l::taeS 20JIxeS I1xeS 21.a4 , ~gS ~M 14.g3 'ii'h3 15.l:!.e4 g5 1S.VWf1 22.axb5 ~d3 23.VWf2 l:Ie2 24.'iYxe2 " ~h5 17.LUd2 f5 1S.~d1 'i!l'h6 19.I:!e1 f4 20.LUe4 $..c7 21.~f3 .ih3 22:~'d3 .be225.bxaS 'iYd3 2S.~f2 .bf3 2Vu xf3 "" t2Je4+ 2S.~e1 t2Jxc3 J:[f7 23.il.d2 l:IafS 24.~h1 ':'g7 2S.~f3 l:1gf7 2S.~h1 I1g7 27.~13 29.bxc3 'fWxc3+ 30.~f2 ~xa1 31.a7 llgf7 112-112 hS 32.M g4 0-1 105
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Ruy Lopez Closed Variation 1.e4 e5 2.~f3 ·!"c6 3.~b5 a6
4 ..ia4 ~f6 5.0-0 ~e7 6.l:e1 b5 7.1..b3 d6 Rc3
i:
Let's stop to look at the real reasons for White's last move, given the worrying fact that so many opening books do not explain the thinking behind it. 8.c2-c3 could seem to be preparation for d2-d4. However, the real reason is highly tactical. The most natural would appear to be the immediate 8.d2-d4, leaving the c3 -square for the knight, but this allows an unpleasant tactical intermezzo: 8 ..,tLlxd4 9.tLixd4 exd41O:~xd4??
1O... cS followed by 11. ..c4, and the bishop on b3 is captured. So as not to lose the bishop, the gambit continuation lO.c3!? becomes necessary. It gives some compensation, but probably not enough. Now we can understand in what sense 8.c3 prepares for d4: it makes the c2 -square available for the fleeing bishop. 8. ... 0-0 Here White usually plays the prophylactic move 9.h3 anticipating .. .~g4 which would indirectly put pressure on the centre. It is worth mentioning the interesting possibility to get off the beaten path by proceeding to a direct occupation of the centre with 9. d2-d4 ~c8-g4
Thematic. Black already threatens 1O... ~xf3, requiring White to recapture with the g-pawn. However, White has resources with which he can liven up the game. This can be done in two ways: A) 10. jLc1-e3 defends d4 and keeps the position fluid. At this point Black concedes the centre, in order to attack it next with 10.... e5xd4 11. c3xd4 tLic6-a5
106
Ruy Lopez - Closed Variation 12. i1t.b3-c2 with active piece play.
c7-c5
The position is fluid and complex and provides both players with possibilities. B)
10. d4-d5
A move typical of the Ruy Lopez. It
gains space and closes the centre, giving Black a free hand on the flanks. 10. ... ttJc6-a5 11 . .l1I.b3-c2
Let's now go back to 9 .h3.
This is the most solid and the most popular move: White wishes to prevent ...~g4 and postpones d2-d4 to the following move. This is the initial position of the Closed Spanish, the most popular system of all the open games and a chapter of fundamental importance in the history of chess openings. The number of arrows in the diagram shows the unusually high number of moves which can be played by Black, which is testimony to how flexible his position is. The subsequent game is usually characterized by heavy manoeuvring, with possible complications being played out at a later stage in the game. Now we will have a quick look at Black's options, in ascending order of popularity: A)
9 ....
~d8-d7
11. .. c6! is a pawn move of fundamental theoretical importance. White cannot support the pawn chain widl c3-c4, as he can in other variations, and must therefore take on c6. After 12.h3! ~c8 ! 13.dxc6 WVc7 14.ttJbd2 ~xc6, play is dynamic and the weakness of the e4-pawn is compensated for by the customary free play afforded to the white pieces.
107
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I One of Smyslov's many interesting ideas in the Oosed Spanish: it frees the dS-square so Black can make the move ... lleS without having to worry about tDg5, as f7 can be defended with ... tDdS. 10. d2-d4 :US-eS 11. ttJb1-d2 i.e7-fS Black prevents the manoeuvre tDfl -g3, as after ... exd4 the e4-pawn can be taken. 12.2Lb3-c2 2LcS-b7 Now, 13.tDfl does not work because of 13 ... exd4followed by 14... tDb4. 13. a2-a3 and we have a customary Ruy Lopez position that is rich in opportunities for both sides. B)
9 ....
a6-aS
C)
lOS
2LcS-e6
The threatened fork by the pawn obliges Black to exchange: 10. ... 2Le6xb3 11. 'iYd1 xb3 The ambitious II.axb3 is also playable because, after 11...exd4 12.cxd4, the badly placed pawn on b3 is compensated for by White's piece activity and occupation of the centre. 11. ... ~dS-d7 12. ttJb1-d2 JUS-eS 13. ttJd2-f1 White has an edge. D)
Black's intention is gaining space on the queenside and also exchanging off White's light-squared bishop. 10. d2-d4 as-a4 11 . .i1l.b3-c2 eSxd4 12. c3xd4 ttJc6-b4 However, after 13. d4-dS! with the idea of tDd4, the weakness of the pawn on b5 and White's more harmonious development give White a clear advantage.
9 .... 10. d2-d4!
9 ....
h7-h6
The Smyslov Variation. Here also, the idea is to play ... J:t:eS and .. .~f8 without having to worry about tDg5 . However, 10. d2-d4 J::tfS-eS 11. ttJb1-d2 i.e7-fS
Ruy Lopez - Closed Variation 12. li:ld2-f1! Indeed, after 12 ... exd4?! 13.cxd4
13 ... li:l xe4?? does not work because of 14 ..ii.dS, which wins a piece: this is a tactical motif that does not exist in the 9... 'Vii dl variation. ~c8-d7 12. ...
Also sometimes 12 .. ..ii.b7 is seen. 13. li:lf1-g3 li:lc6-a5 c7-c5 14. ~ b3-c2 We have a position reminiscent of the Chigorin Variation (9 ... li:la5 - see Variation I further on) with the usual slight advantage for White. Sometimes the knight goes to b6 with 14 ... li:lc4 lS.b3 li:lb6. which controls a4 and dS . The knight is certainly better placed on b6 than on as. However. also in this case White has the freer position. E)
9 ....
li:lf6-d7
10. d2-d4
~e7-f6
Keres's interesting idea : by putting d4 under pressure. you prevent the natural li:lbd2 because the d4-pawn would b e left undefended. However. Black's two last moves were non-developing and White profits from this with the thematic 11. a2-a4 ~c8-b7 12. li:lb1-a3! highlighting the Achilles' heel of many Ruy Lopez variations: the bS-pawn. At this point Black usually responds with 12.... e5xd4!? 13. c3xd4 .l:U8-e8 but if the truth be told, White's mobile centre seems to be more of a strength than a weakness. F) l::!.f8-e8 9.... transposes to the Zaitsev Variation after 10. d2-d4 ~c8-b7
G) 9 . ... ~c8-b7 The popular Zaitsev Variation.
Here we have a set-up which tries to prevent the manoeuvre li:lbl-d2-fl-g3 by exerting pressure on e4 at the opportune moment. 10. d2-d4 J:l.f8-e8 Preparing for ....ii.fB. It should now be noted that if White plays 11.li:lgS, Black 109
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 must return the rook to f8, with the tacit idea of a draw by repetition after 12.tLlf3. If Black does not want the draw that would occur if he repeats the move 12 .. .I:le8, he will need to fall back on minor lines that are not as effective. After the usual 11. tLlb1-d2 the reply 11. ... ~e7-f8 prevents 12.tLlfl because after 12 ... exd4 13.cxd4 Black can win the pawn on e4; while 12.tLlg5 is useless now because of 12 .. J:re7.
G2) 12. a2-a4 More aggressive. h7-h6 12 . ... 13. iLb3-c2 To transfer the bishop to d3 and attack b5. Black usually responds with the violent 13. ... e5xd4!? 14. c3xd4 tLlc6-b4 c7-c5 15. ~c2-b1 16. d4-d5 tLlf6-d7 17. :!:!.a1-a3 f7-f51?
Here, White can choose between two very different plans: G1)
12. ~b3-c2
The positional approach. White defends the e4-pawn, but above all prepares d4-d5 followed by b2-b3 and c3-d, to keep the pawn chain intact when Black attacks its head with ...c6 . 12. ... 97-96 13. d4-d5 tLlc6-b8 14. b2-b3 c7-c6 15. c3-c4 tLlb8-d7 Black's pOSition is solid, even if White can patiently try to exploit his space advantage. 110
This leads to strategically and tactically complex positions. White's centre will collapse, after which the b7 -bishop becomes active and Black's mass of centre pawns can begin to march down. Black's problem is the safety of his king: The manoeuvre tLlh2-g4, the l:!a3 ready to slide over to f3 or g3, and the two white bishops bearing down on the castled black king are ingredients for truly exciting play. Some of the best examples are to be found in the historic Kasparov-Karpov matches. We are yet to hear the last word on these variations, but OIl the whole the results favour White. H) 9 .... tLlc6-b8 The renowned Breyer Variation, which was advocated almost a hundred years ago by the strong Hungarian player of the same name.
RUy Lopez - Closed Variation
With this paradoxical move Black intends to regroup his pieces more harmoniously. The knight is heading for d7 to give support to the eS-pawn and if the bishop is developed to b7, it will be immediately active. Furthermore, the way is cleared for the c-pawn. Breyer's move is not as popular now as it was in the 1970s, when it was played at the highest level by the likes of Spassky and Karpov. However, it still has its supporters : Kramnik, Beliavsky and Mamedyarov, just to name some notable advocates. 10. d2-d4 tDb8-d7 11. tDb1-d2 Black's best response to 11.c4 is 1 1...c6!. 11. ... ~c8-b7 12. ~ b3-c2 Defending e4 in order to play 1 3. tDfl. 12. ... lU8-e8 13. tDd2-f1 1t is worth noting that 13 .b3!? is becoming increasingly popular, with the idea of playing d4-dS and c3-c4. 13. ... ..ie7-f8 14. tDf1-g3 g7-g6 15. a2-a4 c7-c5 16. d4-d5 c5-c4 17. ~c1-g5 h7-h6 18. ..ig5-e3 tDd7-c5 19. 'lWd1-d2
White has some possibilities for taking the initiative on the kings ide, and also at times on the queenside with J:l.a3 and l:lea 1. That said, Black's position is both solid and flexible and tournament results have been satisfactory for the second player. I)
9 ....
tDc6-a5
The Chigorin Variation, which is the oldest, and over the years also the most popular line. However, it is not necessarily the best. Black immediately begins to become active on the queenside, which would appear to be the most natural plan. But on as, the knight remains sidelined for a while and more often than not Black's pieces are less harmoniously coordinated in comparison to other variations of the Closed Spanish. 10. ~ b3-c2 c7-c5 111
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 11. d2-d4 'Ylfd8-c7 Defending eS; another move which has its adherents is 11 ... tLld7, which was played many times by Keres. 12. ttJb1-d2
14. ttJd2-f1 iLc8-e6 15. ttJf1-e3 J:la8-d8 c5-c4 16. ~d1-e2 17. ttJe3-f5 the position is difficult to evaluate.
12) 12 .... c5xd4 This is the most popular line. 13. c3xd4 ttJ a5-c6
Now Black has two important strategic choices: to keep the position closed or to open up the c-file and start active piece play. 11) 12.... ttJa5-c6 and now White can keep the game closed with 13 .dS tLld8 14.a4, with a slightly better position thanks to his space advantage and the sad looking knight on d8; otherwise he can open up the position with 13.d4xc5 hoping to take advantage of the outposts on dS and fS. After 13. ... d6xc5
attacking the d4-pawn and preparing for tLlb4. 13 ... ~ d7 is also played. Now, after 14.tLlfl :1i:ac8 1S.tLle3 tLlc6 16.dS tLlb4 1 7 . ~b 1 as 18.a3 tLla6 19 .M!, White is a little better. Black cannot take twice on b4, because after 19 ... axb4 20.axb4 tLlxb4?? 21..~.d2
surprisingly, the knight on b4 cannot be defended (21... 'iW c5 22. 'ifb3) and it has no escape square. 112
Ruy Lopez - Closed Variation
Schlechter,Carl
14. tLld2-b3
Prokes,~dislav
Prague 1908 (H) ,
Why not the usual 14.tLlfl? For the simple reason you would lose a pawn, as after the exchanges on d4 the bishop on c2 is unprotected. 14. ... as-a5 Threatening lS ... a4. 15. ~c1-e3 Defending d4. a5-a4 15 .... 1S. tLlb3-d2 tLlcS-b4 17. i1i.c2-b1 ~c8-d7 18. a2-a3 tLl b4-cS 19. Ab1-d3 tLlcS-a5 Noteworthy is the 'knight's tour' made by this black knight: c6-aS-c6-b4-c6-aS. 20. 'iWd1-e2 'iVc7-b8 21. l:ta1-c1
White will take advantage of the opening of the queenside.
1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 tLleS 3 ..tb5 as 4.1l.a4 tLlfS 5.0-0 Jl.e7 S.:te1 b5 7.il.b3 d6 ' B.c3 0-0 9.h3 h6 10.d4 exd4 11.cxd4 'tLla5 12~c2 i,b7 13.tLlbd2 n e8 .,14.tLlf1 d5 15.e5 4:le4 16.tLlg3 tLlxg3 ·17.fxg3 c5 18.'f¥d3 gS 19.e6 fS : 20.g4 .ih4 21.ne2 tLleS 22.gxfS .,tLlb4 23 .• d2 tLlxc2 24:ii'xh6 'iffS ; ' 2S.ttxc2 ~xfS 2SJ1xc5 .1fS 27.l'.tc7 [:te7 2S.:txe7 .be7 29..tf4 'ffhS ' .30.VWxhS gxhS 31 ~gS $.b4 32.83 it.aS 33.e7 il.c7 34.J:ie1 l'.teS 3S.J:ie6 ·,~~736:~h6+ 'it>gS 37.tLlgS 1-0 ~
Adams,Michael . Beliavsky,Alexander' · . .
\':': Leon Ech-tt 1001 (9)
,) 1.64 eS 2.tLlf3 tLle6 3 :~bS a6 ' 4 ..1a4 tLlf6 S.O-O .ie7 6.Ue1 . b5 ) ...i.b3 d6 S.c3 0-0 9.h3 ::teS 1().d4 "j~b7 11.lDbd2 ~fS 12.dS lDbS ·'13.t2:\f1 lDbd7 14.lD3h2 lDc5 1S.il.e2 c6 16.b4 lDcd7 17.dxc6 ,.b e6 1S.tLlg4 lDxg4 19.hxg4 lDb6 20.'ffd3 g6 21.:td1 .'fIc7 22.1Ii'f3 ;i.d7 23.i.b3 jj,e6 24.i.g5 a5 25.lDe3 ·, il.xb3 .. 26.axb3 axb4 27.cxb4 , trxa1 • 2S.Uxa1 d5!it . 29.t2:\xdSlDxdS 30.exdS e4 31.'iVe3 · , ~d7 32.~d2 'iVxg4 33.J:la6 i.xb4 . 34.1Vc1 ~e5 3SJlc6 e3t 36.Axe3 ~~xe3 37.fxe3 hS+ 3S.l'.tc7 .t1eS 39.Wf1 UfS 40.1Wa1 ..t>h7 · 41.d6 . ~g3 42.Ue8 'iYxe3+ 43.~h1 f6 44.lIe3 'iYd2 4SJle7+ w h6 4S.d7 :l'.teS47JWc3 fgxe3 48.l:txe3 lldS-+ 49J'le7 fS 50.b4 ~gS S1Jl b7 wg4 52.<.th2 h4 S3JbbS nxd7 54.trc5 J:id2 ·, 5S.'it>g1 l:tb2 113
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 " ...
,,~
,
SS.bS h3 S7.:c4+ f4 5S.gxh3+ ~g3 S9.~fl :XbS SO.<;i;>e2 gS . 0-1 .v.
An~d:Vis;~a'ili~
"~}' '",
i
~
Adams,Michael San Luis Web· FIDE 2005 (3)
, Kasparov.Garry Karpov.Anatoly London/Leningrad Wch m 1986 (16)
:1.e4 eS V b f3 8 c6 3.~b5 as 4.~a4 8fS S.O-O iLe7 6.l:!.el bS 7.~b3 dS S.c3 0-0 9.h3 iLb7 10.d4 UeS 11.lbbd2 .\if8 12.a4 hS 13 ~c2 exd4 14.cxd4 8b4 15.iLb1 c5 lS.dS 8d7 17.Ua3 c41S.lLid4 ~fS19.lb2f3 tDcS 20.axb5 axb5 21.tt:JxbS Iba3 22.8xa3 ii.aS 23.:e3 n bS! 24.e5! dxe5 2S.8xe5 8bd3? 2S.8g4? ,'iYb6! 27.l:tg3 gSI 2S..b hS ~xb2 29.~f31 tDd7?! 30..b fS ~xfS 31.'~h2! J:b3! 32..\txd3 cxd3? •[32...:xa3!:::] " 33.'iVf4 1!Vxa3? 34.tDh6 Wie7 3S.ItxgS ~eS 3S.ItgS+ ~ e7 37.dS++- , <;Pe6 3S.UeS+ Itid5 39.l:txe5+ 8 xe5 40.d7 : bS 41.8 xf7 ,. 1-0
, Kasparov.Garry Kaipov.Anatoly Lyon/New York Wch m 1990 (20)
,' l.e4 eS 2.tDf3 8 cS 3.iLbS as 4Ji.a4 tDf6 5.0-0 i.e7 6.l:te1 b5 7.$.b3 d6 S.c3 0-0 9.h3 , ,iLb7 10.d4 J:teS 11.tDbd2 ~f8 12.a4 h6 13.£l.c2 exd4 14.cxd4 tDb4 lS.£l.b1 c5 lS.dS tDd7 ·.17.11a3 f5 lS.: ae3 tDfS 19.tDh2 ~h8 20.b3 bxa4 21.bxa4 c4 22.Jt.b2 fxe4 23.tDxe4 tDfxd5 24.Itg3 J:[e6 2S.tDg4 ' 1WeS 2S.tDxhS c3 27.tDf5 cxb2 2S.l!Vg4 iLc8 29.'ifh4+ IthS 30.tDxh6 ' gxhS 31.'it'h2 'iYeS 32.tDgS fifS 33.J:[e8 £l.fS 34.'Wxh6+ 'iVxh6 3S.tDf7+ '<;Ph7 36,j,xf5+ 'iYg6 37..b g6+ wg7 3S.: xaS iLe7 39JlbS a5 40i e4+ xf7 41.bd5+ ., 170 114
1.e4 e5 2.lbf3 tDc6 3.ib5 as 4~a4 , tDfS S.O-O ~e7 6.11el b57.~b3 dS S.c3 0-0 9.h3 i.b7 10.d4 .J:eS 11.tDbd2 ~f812.a4 hS13.i.c2 exd4 14.cxd4 tDb4 15..tbl c5 16.dS tDd7 17.Ita3 c4 lS.axb5 'axbS 19.tDd4' ~bS 20;8 f5 tDe5 21 :J:tg3 gS 22.tDf3 <8ed3 , 23.'~d2 .bdS · 24.tDxhS+~ £l.xhS ' 25.~xhS 'iYxf2+ 26.'it'h2 tDxel 27.tDh4 tDed3 2S.tDxg6 'it'xg3+ 29.~xg3 fxg630JWxg6+. fS 31.'iYfS+ IitigS 32.ithS 1-0
Anand. Viswanathan Kasinidzhanov.Rustam
'.~ "
Bastiarapid 2006 (4)
1.e4 e5 2.tDf3 tDc6 3.i.bS as 4 ..b 4
0 f6 5.0-0 ~7 S.tIel b5 7.~b3 d6 ac3 0-0 9.h3 IteS 10.d4 ~b711.tDbd2 £l.f8 12.a4 h6 13.iLc2 exd4 :14.cxd4 tDb4 15..tb1 c5 1S.d5 lOd717Jl8a c4 lS.tDd4 'iffS 19.tD2f3 tbc5 20.: ee3' tDbd3 21.axb5 axb5 22.tDxb5 IDta3 23.tDxa3 J:txe4 24.tiJxc4 tDxf2 25:~e2 tDxh3+ 26.gxh3 'iWg6+ 27.Wf2 Uxe3 2S.b e3 ~xbl 29..bc5 dxc5 30:ife5 ~c2+ 31.tDfd2 'iVd332.d6 " ~xh3 33.'We8 iLc8 34.tDeS ' ~eS 3S.'iWxe6 b e6 36.<8e4 f5 37.d7 b d7 3atbf6+~ gxf6 39.tDxd7 <Ml 40.'iM3 iLd6 41.tDb6 we6 42.b3 hS 43.tDc4 h4 " 0-1 i ,
;
"
~
Kotronias. Vasilios Bologan.Viktor Moscow Aeroflot Open 2007 (6)
~
1.e4 a 5 2.tDf3 tDcS 3...\kb5 as 4...\ka4 tDf6 5.0-0 ~e7 SJXe1 b5 7.~b3 d6 S.c3 0-0 9.h3 ~b7 10.d4 .!:tea, 11.tDbd2 .tfS 12.a4 h613.iLc2 exd4
Ruy Lopez - Closed Variation
14.cxd4 tt:lb4 lS.jLb1 'CS 16.dS tt:l~'J7 17.~a3 c4 lS.axbS axbS 19.tt:ld4 :'iVb6 20.tt:lfS tt:leS 21.1:1.93 g6 22.tt:lf3 ,tt:led3 23.iLe3 WVdS 24.hh6 'iYf6 26.tt:lh2 J:[xe4 : 2S:i'k'd2 .. tLJxe1 .27.~xe4 lla1 2S.tt:lf1 it..xdS 29.it..xdS 'iVxfS 30•.i!.xf7+ ..t>xf7 31 ..i!.xfS tLJbd3 32.~h6 'i'xf2+ ' 33.wh2 'iWf6 ' 34.tt:le3 tLJf2 3S.tt:lc2 tt:lxc2 36.rl.f3 ' l:thH 37.'~g3 tLJe4+' 38.Wg4 l:!.f1 '39.l:l:xf6+ I:txf6 ' 40.'t!fg7+ We6 4H~¥e7+ WdS 42 ..th6 11f2 43.'iWb7+ : ~d4 44.g3 tt:le3+ 4Sbe3+Wxe3 '46.'iWa7+ ' Wd3 47Jlia3+ we2 4S.~aS dS 49.'lWeS 11f3 SO.h4 b4 ' S1.~h3 I:txg3+ 52.'~h2 c3 53:bxc3 0-1 bxc3 54.hS c2 SS.~bS+ rtd3
, Fischer.Robert Spassky.Boris " Reykjavik Wch m 1972 (10)
,
Topalov, Veselin , Adams,Michael ' Cap d'Agde rapid 2003 (2)
1.e4 eS 2.tZlf3 tLJc6 3.ii..b5 a6 4..i!.a4 tLJf6 5.0-0 .te7 6,lle1 bS 7..ib3 d6 S.c3 0-0 9.h3 tZlaS 10..tc2 cS 11.d4 tZld7 12.tLJbd2 exd4 13.cxd4 tLJc6' 14.dS tLJce5 lS.a4 iLb7 16.tZlxeS tZlxeS17.f4 tZld718.tLJf3lleS 19.~d2 $..f6 20.:a2g6 21.Wh2 jLg7 22.b3 \¥kc7 23.~d3 c4 24.bxc4 tt:lc5 25 ~c2 bxc4 26.tta3 as 27.~c3 '.ta6 2S..bg7 ~xg7 29.tLJd4 tZld3 . 30.~xd3 cxd3 31.tZlc6 g8 32:~'d2 .t1acS ' 33.I:tb3 fS 34.exfS ~f7 3S.J:te6 $..c4 36.l1xd3 ..bd3 3HUxd3. gxfS 38.lZid4 1:1f8 39.tLJb5 llcdS 40.tt:lxd6 flIc7 41.'iVg3+ 'iVg7 42.'iWe3 WhS 43.tLJe8 , 'fIib2 44.d6 Ug8 4S.'fIieS+ ~xeS 46.fxeS l:!.gxe8 1-0 47JIxeS+ l:!.xe8 48.d7 ,
1.e4 eS 2.tt:lf3 tt:lc6 3~bS a6 4i a4 tt:lf6 ' S.o-O ~e7 6Jl e1 bS 7.ii.b3 d6 Karpov.Anatoly . Unzicker. Wolfgang S.ca 0-0 9.h3 , tt:lbS 10.d4 tZlbd7 11.tLJbd2 ~b7 12~c2 l:I.e8 13.b4 g 18 Nice 01 1974 (3) 1.e4 eS 2.tZlf3 tLJc6 3.jLbS a6 4 ..b4 14084 tLJb6 1S.aStZlbd7 16~b2 'i'bS tLJf6 S.O-O iJ.e7 6.l;:[e1 bS 7.~b3 d6 17.l:Ib1 c5 1S.bxcS dxc5 19.dxeS ,tLJxe5 20.tt:lxeS ' 'iYxe5 21.c4 'lWf4= 8.c3 0-0 9.h3 tLJaS 10.ii..c2 cS 11.d4 ' 22~ 't\Vxf6 23.cxb5 J:[ed8 24.1Vc1 " 'flIc712.tLJbd2 tbc6 13.d5 tZldS 14084 i Wc3 2S.tZlf3 ~xa5 26 ..i!.b3! axb5 " I:tbS1S.axbS axbS16.b4 tt:lb717.tbf1 ' ; 27.'lWf4 lld7 2S.tLJeS 'fIic7 29.I:tbd1! '>it..d7 .1S.i.e3 l:ta8 19:~'d2 I:tfcS 20..td3 96 21.tZlg3 ..tfS 22'%:I:a2 c4 d:Ie7 30~7+ J:1xf7 31JWxf7+ 't\Vxf7 : 32.tt:lxf7 .be4 33.I:lxe4 'w xf7 34.I:td7+ 23.it..b1 " dS 24.~7!! [the idea is to double the rooks on the a-file] 24...tZleS :<M6 35Jlb7 tta1+ [~35".b4] 36.'it>h2 !.td6+' 37.g3 b4 3S.g2 hS 39J:tb6 25 ..tc2 tLJc7 26.:tea1 'fIie7 27.$..b1 iJ.e8 28.tt:le2 tZld8 29.tZlh2 iJ.g7 30.14 ;ttd1 40.'it>f3! Wf7?! [40 .. ,g5!] 41.<;t;e2 ' ttd5 42f41 g6 43.g41 hxg4 44.hxg4 g5 f6 31.fS gS 32.~c2 ~f7 33.tbg3lLlb7 34.~d1 h6 3S ..thS 'fIie8 36J'kd1 4S.f5 ..teS 46.l:1b5 <M6 47.!Iexb4 '~d4 '4&J:lb6+ WeS 49.'iM3! l:tdS 50.~b8 lLld8 37Jla3 W18 38.I:t1a2 ~g8 , :l.d7 51 J:t4b7 J:td6 52Jlb6 n d7 53J:tg6 . 39.tLJg4'Wf8 40.tZle3 Wg8 41 ..txf7+ tZlxf7 42:ikh5 tZld8 43:~Yg6 Wh8 ,WdS 54J.!xg5 ~eS 5S.f6 Wd4 S6.11b1! 1-0 44.tLJhS 1-0 115
Semi-Open Games
Minor defences after 1. e4 Owen Defence Nirnzowitsch Defence Scandinavian Defence Alekhine Defence Modern Defence Pirc Defence Caro-Kann Defence French Defence Sicilian Defence
117
Minor Defences after l.e4
Minor Defences after 1.c2 -c4
Now we enter the blood-stained battleground of the sceptics who have dared to challenge the sanctity of established theory. A word of warning: these minor defences should not be taken lightly. This is a lesson learnt the hard way by a World Champion, Anatoly Karpov, in a game against the late Tony Miles in 1980. The English grandmaster was an aficionado of minor systems, and to the dismay of Karpov as well as purists the world over, he won their encounter using the following minor defence: 1. ...
b7-b5 2. d2-d4 3. l2Jg1-f3 In some lines of the Kan Variation of the Sicilian, it's better to refrain from l2Jc3, so as not to be bothered by ... bS -b4. 3. AcS-b7 4. ~f1-d3 l2JgS-fS 5. 'iYd1-e2 e7-eS c7-c5 6. 0-0 7. c2-c3
White has good prospects in the centre. In addition, with the pawn advance a2-a4, there are also attacking possibilities on the queenside. However, the solidity of Black's position should not be underestimated. Even more provocative is Basman's idea 1. ... g7-g51!
a7-a61
;\ t~t.
.
,,"'.t,l.
£:'888 t,£:,£:, l:ttLl~'iV~~tLllI Black can fmd himself in a type of Modern Defence after 2.d4 h6, with what is 119
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
called an 'extended fianchetto' . In general it pays not to be dogmatic. However, the lost tempo and, more importantly, the weakening of the kingside seems to be a bit beyond the pale. Therefore, with correct play, these defects should guarantee White a clear advantage.
Nimzowitsch Defence 1.c2-C4 ~ b8-c6
Owen Defence , .e2-e4 b7-b6
~~...
1...b6 is the Owen Defence. Following 2.c4 e6 3.M, the position quickly transposes to the English Defence. .l¥.c8-b7 2. d2-d4 3. .ltf1-d3! e7-e6 3 ... f5?! 4.exf5! Axg2 5.~h5+ g6 6.fxg6 Ag7 seems to be too risky on account of 7 . ~f5! (7.gxh7+ is also promising) 7 ... ttJf6 8 .jLh6! .ltxh6 9.gxh7 with IO.~g6+ and I1.'i¥xh6 to come. 4. ttJg1-f3 c7-c5 lZlg8-f6 5. c2-c3 6. 'ilVd1-e2! with a small but meaningful advantage. 120
·"kP
The most respectable of the minor systems is I ...ttJc6. This defence was champio ned by the great Aaron Nimzowitsch, and thus carries his name. Its ambitious objective is to apply pressure to White's d4-pawn, but in practice this doesn't usually happen. Placing the two centre pawns side by side is the most natural and ambitious response for White. 2. d2-d4 You can also come across 2.ttJf3, which gives Black the opportunity to 'repent' and to transpose to a more common member of the Open Games with 2 ... e5. However, the type of player who opts for 1...ttJc6 is not likely to enjoy a mainstream opening, and will therefore probably go for 2 ...d6 or 2 ... d5. The orthodox continuation is d7-d5 2 .... You should note that 2...e5!? is increasingly being played nowadays, but after 3.dxe5! ttJxe5 4.ttJf3!, White has a small but clear plus.
Minor Defences after l .e4 3. lLlb1-c3 It is better to maintain the tension. The alternatives 3 .eS ~fS or 3.exdS 'Uk'xdS, even though both plausible, would give Black the active game that he seeks. 3 .... dSxe4 After 3 ... e6 we have an inferior version of the French. 3 .. .lLlf6!? is interesting: after 4.eS lLld7, the move 5.lLlxd5?! would be weak because of 5 ... lLldb8!. However, a good move would be S.lLlce2, which is inspired by the Steinitz Variation of the French. 4. d4-dS lLlcS-eS 4 .. .4:Jb8Iooks too passive. S. 'fid1-d41? lLleS-gS
S. 1Wd4xe4! 6.lLlxe4 e5!. lLlgS-fS S. 7. ~ e4-a4+ -tcS-d7 S. ~f1-bS White enjoys the advantage, since his dS -pawn renders .. .e6, and thereby Black's development, more difficult.
121
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
kingside pawn majority, which tends to make kingside castling a safer proposition for Black.
Scandinavian Defence 1.e2-e4 d 7-d 5
"
"
As with the Petroff Defence, here is another case of recent re-evaluation. The move ... d7 -dS is the typical freeing move in many defences; just think of some of the examples from the Sicilian or the RUy Lopez. Here, however, things are not so simple: after 2 .exdS, if Black takes back with the queen he remains behind in development. If. on the other hand, he plays 2 .. .'1Jf6 so as to take on dS with the knight; after 3.M, White gets a nice centre with prospects of further expansion with c2-c4. At least, that is what opening manuals have blindly repeated for years and years. However, recent practice has demonstrated that this assessment is a little superficial and that there are structural elements present which are favourable for Black: to start with, Black frees himself of the irritating presence of the e4-pawn, which in King's Pawn openings lays the foundation for kingside attacks. In addition, we have a 4 :3 122
It is still true that advancing his pawn to d4 gives White a certain central predominance, at least in terms of space, with greater piece activity as a consequence. It is no surprise that you have the same pawn structure as in the Caro-Kann and the Rubinstein Variation of the French - which are both solid positions par excellence. 2. e4xdS Now Black can continue in two ways: A) 2 .... 'il'daxdS The queen now loses a tempo after 3. tLJb1-c3 'tlfdS-aS 3 ... 'tlf d6 is a now relatively fashionable alternative, but it seems less natural. 4. d2-d4 This is thematic as it occupies the centre. tLJga-fS 4 .... S. tLJg1-f3 Now Black can play S... tLJc6 to apply pressure on d4 with ... ~g4 and ... 0-0-0. However, this plan seems too ambitious to be realistic. Another choice is S... ~g4 or S... ~fS. S. ... c7-cS
Scandinavian Defence Despite White's possession of the bishop pair and a space advantage, Black's position is solid and well de fended, and it is therefore not surprising that this line is becoming more and more popular among players who don't want to be overwhelmed by the avalanche of theoretical possibilities that awaits them in more mainstream openings in this computer age. This waiting move is generally preferred. It reserves the options of moving the queen's bishop to f5 or g4 and opens an escape route for the queen. The position is now practically that of a Caro-Kann where Black has lost some tempi, and he will lose ano ther with a further queen move. On the other hand, White's knight is more passive on c3 than on e4. Moreover, by following this virtually forced sequence Black has avoided the dangerous Advance Variation oftheCaro-Kann. 6. i..f1-c4 ~cS-f5 6 .. .~g4 is also playable. 7. ~c1-d2 e7-e6 S. 'iVd1-e2! With the idea of d4-d5.
s....
~fS-b4!
9. 0-0-0 10. a2-a3 11. £ d2xc3
ttJbS-d7 iLb4xc3 'iVa5-c7
If Black does not wish to expose the queen, he may prefer:
B)
ttJgS-f6 2 .... 3. d2-d4 For the alternative 3.c4 c6! 4.d4! cxd5, see the Panov-Botvinnik Attack in the Caro-Kann. Instead, after 4.dxc6?! ttJxc6 5.d3 e5, Black has optimum compensation for the pawn. 3. ... ttJf6xd5 The sharp 3 ... i..g4!? had a moment of popularity, but Black's compensation for the pawn seems doubtful after 4.f3, followed by 5. ~b5 + . 4. c2-c4 Or fust 4.ltJf3. 4. ttJd5-b6 5. ttJg1-J3
Here Black has two plans: 123
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
81)
5.._
~cS-g4
This looks logical, but White's centre remains strong after
6. ~fl-e2 7. 0-0 S. tLl bl-c3!
e7-e6 tLlbS-c6 ~fS-e7
After 8 ... fixj3? ! 9.fixj3 tUxc4 1O.d5! White has the adva IItage.
9. d4-d51 10.c4xd5
e6xd5 tLlc6-b4 And now after either IO ... tUaS 1l.b3, or lO ... tUe7 11.g4!, White's prospects seem to be better, even if the tactically and strategically complex game that follows offers Black good chances as well.
~
Spasskf,Boris"' Larsen,Bent Montr~al 1979 (17)
11. it'dl-d41 Not only hitting the bishop on g4, but also the pawn on g7.
11 .. _ 12. ~e2xf3
~g4xf3
And White is slightly better. Indeed, if 12 ... tUc2? 13.'i!fxg7 il..f6 14.'*fh6 tUxa1? 15.1:.el+ q;,d7 16.jl,g4+, checkmate follows.
82)
5 .... 6. h2-h3!
g7-g6
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 .-xd5 3.tLlc3 'ira5 4.d4 tLlf6 5.tLlf3 .i.f5 6.~d2 It:Jbdi .7sa.c4 ' c6 8:t'i'e2 e6 9.d5 cxd5 , 10.lOxd51i'c5 11.b4 1i'ca 12.lOxf6+; gxf6 13.lOd4 ~g6 14.h4 h5 15.14: .i.e7 16.1:.h3 1Vc7 17.0-0-0 _b6 lS.~el 0-0-0 ' 19.tLlb5 tLlbS ~20.1:.xdS+ Ii.>xdS · 21 ..i.f2 't'i'c6 ' 22 ..ba7 lOd7 23.a3 'ife4 24.~e3 , \:i.f5 25':1g3 'MIc6 26.lOd4 _a4 ; 27.lOxf5 1Iixa3+ , 2S.'it>d1 Wa1+ 29.~cl ~xb4 30.~b5 lOb6 31."e4 .11t'a532....xb7 1-0
A useful prophylactic move.
6. 7. S. 9.
... tLlbl-c3 £ cl-e3 'irdl-d2
~f8-g7
0-0 tLlbS-c6
Preparing to castle queens ide.
9. ...
e7-e5
The only useful move for Black.
10. d4-d5 124
Svieller,Peter Tiviakov,Sergey Wijk aan
Zee 2007 (2)
1.e4 d5 2.exd5 1Wxd5 3.1Oc3 1i'd6 4.d4 1Of6 5.tbf3 a6 6.g3 .tg4 7.h3 · ..ih5 S...tg2 1Oc6 9.0-0 0-0-0 10...tf4 . 'irb4 11.g4 ~g6 12.a3 1ifc4 13.g5 lOd514.ti:Jxd51:.xd515.c31:.dS·16.b3 •
Scandinavian Defence
1i'd3 17.'ifc1 ~c2 1S.~e3' e6 19.M ,'ife4 20.lild2 ' If'xe3 21.fxe3 e5 22.~g3 exd4 23.cxd4 it.d6 24..bd6 'cxd6 25J::tac1 wd7 26.tbc4 h6 ,27.tbb6+ w eS :" 2S.9xh6 J:Ixh6 t 29.tiJd5 f6 30.a4 ~f7 31.b5 ' axb5 32.axb5 tba5 33.1:[a1 tiJc4 34.1:[a7 tJ:Ih5 35.tiJc7+ wf8 36..txb7 l:txh3 ! 37.l:tf3 nh5 38.~c6 UbS 39.1:[g3 i'tbb6 40.e4 tiJc8 41.1::[a1 J:Ih4 42.tiJa6 ' l:tb6 . 43.tiJb4 1:[bS 44.l:tga3 tiJb6 4S.J:Ia7 dS 46.tiJa6 l:rdS 47J.:tb7 tbc4 :4S.tiJc5 dxe4 49.J:Iaa7 17.g4+' SO.w h2 ,tiJd6 51.J:Ixf7+"tiJxf7 S2.tiJe6+ ~gS 53.tiJxdS tiJg5 54.~dS+ wh7 S5.tiJe6 ".~!3+ S~.Wh~, ,fS '."~7:l:tXg7,+ , " J:[~g7
"'<.,
'.~
"
58.tiJxg7 tbxd4 S9.b6 e3 60.~g2 tiJc2 61.Wf1 tiJb4 62.b7 tiJa6 63.tiJxfS Wg6 64.tiJe 7+ <M6 6S.tiJc6 1-0 ",
.~.
Topalov, Veselin Kamsky.Gata Wijkaan Zee 2006 (1) "
1.e4 ' d5 2.exdS tiJf6 3.tbf3 tiJxdS 4.d4 ;'~fS S•.td3 it..xd3 6.lf'xd3 e6 7.0-0 tiJc6 S.c4 tiJb6 9.tiJc3 it..e7 10.A f4 gS 11 ..ltg3 g4 12.tbe5 lllxd4 " 13.c5 ~xcS 14J1ad1 , O-0 15.tiJe4 '.lte716.tbxg4 cS17.b4 tiJd51S.bxcS tiJfS ' 19.'i!ff3 ncs 20.it..d6 tiJxd6 21.cxd6 .\th4 22.d7 l:rc6 23.tiJeS J:Ic7 2.,.fifg4+ ~~S 2.5_~tiJd~ " 1-0
125
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I A)
Alekhine Defence
4. c2-c4 5. f2-f4
lbd5-b6
1.e2-e4 .'2.. 98-f6
'.~
This is one of the most theoretically revolutionary openings in the history of the game. First made famous by the later World Champion Alexander Alekhine in 1921, it is based on a startling concept, which at the time bordered on heresy: to provoke White to advance his pawns in an attempt to prove that these advanced centre pawns are in fact a weakness rather than a strength. 2. e4-eS lbf6-dS 3. d2-d4 3.c4 4:Jb6 4.c5 ttJd5 has its supporters, but it is not at all clear if White's pawn is better on c5 than on c2. 3 .lbc3!? is interesting, with the idea of 3 .. .4:Jxc3 4.dxc3! with active play to compensate for the doubled pawns. 3. ... d7-d6 The attack on White's pawn centre begins. After ... dxe5 and ... 4:Jc6, the d4-pawn becomes the target. Now White must decide whether to gain further space in the centre or content himself with a quieter approach. 126
This is the Four Pawns Attack, unquestionably the critical line of the Alekhine, at least in terms of the philosophy behind strategic theory. It should be noted that instead of supporting the centre with the f-pawn, it has recently become very popular for White to adopt the quiet alternative 5.exd6!?, contenting himself with greater piece mobility and a slight space advantage. But let's return to 5 .f4. How do we evaluate such a position? Is White, with his imposing centre, ready to start a mating attack? Or is his centre a house of cards that is about to collapse? In practice, both of these events occur, and this is why we are looking at some of the most complex and exciting variations in opening literature. Usually Black aims to put d4 under immediate pressure with S. ... d6xeS However, 5 ... g6!? or 5 ... ~f5 are both also pOSSible. 6. f4xeS lbb8-c6 The hyper-aggressive 6 ... c5!? 7.d5 e6 is playable as well . 7. ~c1-e3! If7.4:Jf3? ~g4, White's centre is in crisis.
Alekhine Defence 7.... ~cS-fS S. ttJb1-c3 e7-e6 9. ttJg1-f3 Now Black generally continues with either the solid 9 .. .iLg4, the ambitious 9 ... ~d7, or the normal developing move
9 .... ~fS-e7 This is considered to be the main line, at least in terms of statistical frequency. 10. d4-dS Or lO .iLe2. 10.... e6xdS 11. c4xdS ttJc6-b4 ~fS-d7 12. ttJf3-d4 13. eS-e6 f7xe6 ~ d7-c6 14. dSxe6 1S. ~d1-g4 ~ e7-h4+! 16. g2-g3 ~ c6xh1 17. 0-0-0
some believe; nor does it give Black an advantage, as others maintain.
B)
4.
ttJg1-f3
Observing the Latin maxim 'in medio stat virtus', White does occupy the centre, but he doesn't overdo it! Play in this line is quiet and the variations are characterized by slow manoeuvring. Now Black can choose from the following alternatives: 4 ... ttJc6, 4 ... g6, 4 ... dxe5 or 4 .. .jLg 4.
B1) ttJbS-c6 4 .... This is ambitious but premature. After S. c2-c4 ttJdS-b6 6. eS-e6! f7xe6 White is on top after either 7.ttJg5 or 7.ttJc3. This line is not forced, but it gives an idea of the complexity of these variations. This being the case, it is not a surprise that the percentage of draws in these lines is very low. Nonetheless, years of practical experience, as well as statistics produced by hundreds of games, show that White wins more or less the same percentage of games as he would by employing any other opening. Therefore, the Four Pawns Attack does not refute the Alekhine, as
B2)
4 ....
g7-g6
127
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 This is known as the Alburt Variation. This line was very fashionable in the 198 Os following its adoption by Fischer in his 1972 World Championship match against Spas sky. Today, however, it is seldom used. S. ~f1-c4 tLldS-b6 6. ~c4-b3
~f8-g7
9.iLb3 tLld7 10.tLlf3! tLl7f6 11.h3, and White has a slight plus. 84) 4 .... The Classical Variation. S. il.f1-e2
~c8-g4
White gains /lothing with the hyperactive 5.iLc4 c6.
And now, White gains a promising position with either the aggressive 7.tLlg5 e6 8.iilVf3 or the solid 7.iilVe2 tLlc6 8.0-0 0-09.h3. 83) 4 .... d6xeS This move was underappreciated in the past, but it is now very popular. S. tLlf3xeSI In case of 5.dxe5?! iLg4, the e5-pawn seems to be more ofa weakness than a strength.
At this point 5 ... tLld7 is playable, but then Black exposes himself to 6.tLlxf7!? '.t>xf7 7.~h5+ '.t>e6
after which 8.c4 (or also 8.g3!?) 8 ... tLl5f6 9.d5+ \t>d6 10. ~f7! is psychologically demanding for Black, even if it isn't necessarily winning for White. Therefore recently, Black has shown a preference to prepare ... tLld7 with 5 ... c6, or to fianchetto the itf8 with 5 ... g6, after which the game usually continues as foll ow s: 6.~c4 c6 7 .0-0 ~g7 8. l:Ie 1 0-0 128
S .... e7-e6 Flohr's move 5 ... c6!? is interesting. But it leaves the door open to the complications that ensue after 6.tLlg5!? ~f8-e7 6. 0-0 7. c2-c4 tLldS-b6 8. tLlb1-c3 0-0 9. h2-h3 The c4-pawn is indirectly defended, as after ... ~xf3 the b7 -pawn is hanging. White can also choose not to play h3, but it is generally a useful move. 9. ... il.g4-hS 10. il.c1-e3 d6-dS The moves 10 ... a6 and 10 ... a5 are both interesting, since 11 ... iLxf3 is a threat, as the a7 -square is now free for the rook. 11. c4-cS 11.b3!? and 11.cxd5 are both rare, but playable. 11. ... il.hSxf3 In order to take the knight to c4 after 12.~xf3. But, aware of this , White replies
Alekhine Defence
12. g2xf3! 13. f3-f4
tLlb6-c8
54.We2 We4 SSJlxd6 ' llxe3+ S6.f2 J::!.d3 S7.l:[c6 l:td2+ S8.~e1 ",d3 S9J:id6+ Wc2 .. 60.ne6 lldS 61.~e2 ",b2 62.1:I.c6 c2 ' 0-1
Leko,Peter . lvanchuk,Vasily Odessa rapid 2007 (4,)
White has a good space advantage and seems to have easy attacking possibilities on the kingside. However, the doubling of the f-pawns makes it difficult to break with f4-f5, and Black's position usually proves surprisingly robust.
Steiner,Endre ." Alekhine,Alexander Budapest 1921 (9)
1.e4 tLlf6 2.eS tLldS 3.d4 d6 4.c4 tLlb6 S.exd6 exd6 6.tLlc3 ke7 7.~d3 tLlc6 S.tLlge2 Ag4 9.f3 j(,hS 10.0-0 k g6 11.b3 0-0 12.k e3 l:%ea 13.hg6 hxg6 14.1l1Vd2 kf6 1S.dS tLleS 16.kf2 tbbd7 17.tLle4 ~h4 lS...td4 tLlf6 19.tLl4c3 tLlh720.llad1 a6 21.whl 'fIIe7 22.~gl l:%adS 23.tbd4 tbd7 24.'iWc2 ~f6 2S.l:%d2 '.teS 26.14 .bd4 27..txd4 'Wh4 2S.l:%e2 tLlhf6 ' 29.•d3 llxe2 30:tibe2 neS 31.'iWf3 tbcS 32if2 ~hS 33.'iWxhS gxhS 34.ne1 llxe1+ 3S ..be1 wh7 36.g3 wg6 37.wg2 tLlfe4 3S.tLlxe4 tUxe4 39."'f3 fS 40.h3 iif7 41.g4 g6 42.gxhS gxhS 43."'e3 WeS44.~d4 ~d7 45.~h4 c646~e1 cS+ '{ 1/2-1/2
1.e4 tLlf6 2.eS tbd5 3.d4.d6 4.~g5 dxe5 S.dxeS tLlc6 6.~bS ~fS 7.tbf3 tLlb4 S.tLla3 'ifxd1+ 9.J::I.xdl tLlxc2+ 10.tLlxc2 ~xc2 11.nc1 ke4 12.tLld4 .bg2 13.:g1 0-0-0 14.tLlxc6 ~xc6 ·. 1s.Axc6 bxc6 16.llxc6 lId5 17.Af4 ' Nakamura,Hikarn e6 lS.we2 ~c5 :, 19.b4 .ixb4 Benjamin,Joel 20.J:l.xg7 .l:rd7 21.k e3 as 22.J:l.c4 h5 Philadelphia 2006 (4) 23Jlh4 ~c3 24.1:I.gS :dS 2S.f4 f6 1.e4 tLlf6 2.eS ttJd5 3.c4 ttJb6 4.d4 , 26.%lgxhS " l:txhS 27..ttxhS fxe5 d6 5.f4 dxeS 6.fxe5 tbc6 7..ie3 it.f5 2S.fxeS ~xeS 29J:lh7 l1b5 30."'f3 ,. ," S.ttJc3 e6 9.tbf3 k g4 10.'iYd2 ~3 1J:l.b2 31.n h5 .bh2 32 ..tI:xa5 kd6 11.gxf3 'ifh4+ 12.~f2 'i!VhS 13.cS 'Mixf3 14.:g1 ttJdS lS.~g2 \i'f4 . 33.We4 ",d7 34.jld4 !:td2 3S..te3 l:[e2 . 3S.wd3 .t!.e1 '. 37.kd4 :tcl 16.ttJxdS 'i\t'xd2+ 17.Wxd2 exd5 3S.~e3 lld1+ 39.we4 .t!.el 40.wd3 '· lS..bd5 .adS " 19..ixc6+ bxc6 eS 41,kt2l,If1 42.~e3 we6 43.~e4 20.ltc3 f5 21.b4 wd7 22.a4 J::!.b8 1%h1 , 44.~f2 J:th2 45.~e3 llh4+ 23.Wc4 a6 24Jl gel ~e6 2S.J:l.abl iLe7 26.bS axbS+ , 27.axbS cxbS+ 4S.wd3 kb4 47.na7 cS 4S.a3 c4+ 49.we2 .\tdS ·SO.J::I.aS .Ilh2+ 51.<~"d1 2S.l:!.xbS cS 29.lIb6 .t!.xb6 30.cxbS J::!.h3 .· S2.Wd2 ~dS 53 ..t!dS c3+ " ttbS 31.nb1 gS 32.b7 ~d7 33.d5 129
Chess Open ing Essentia ls - Volume 1
cxdS+
34.~xdS cj;c7 3S.~bS+
~xb73S ..Ml.cS+ ~c7
1-0
, Kotronias, Vasilios Short,Nigel ' Gibraltar 2003 (5)
1.e4 tLlfS 2.eS tLld5 3.d4 dS 4.c4 tLlbS S.f4 dxeS S.fxeS tLlcS 7.i.e3 .Ml.fS S.tLlc3 eS 9.tLlf3 ~d7 10.il.e2 0-0-0 11.0-0 ' fS 12.dS tLlxeS 13.tLlxeS fxeS 14.a4 as 1S.tLlb5 .Ml.b4 1S.dS tLla8 17.cS st>bS 1S..if3 cS 19.tLla3 e4 20.~e2 bS 21.cxbS 1!fxdS 22.'ifxdS+ J:[xdS 23.ltad1 ,J:l.hdS 24.J:l.xdS l:IxdS 25.g4 iLd2 2S.~f2 ~b7 27.tLlc4 :IdS 2S.gxfS exfS 2Uld1 il.b4 30.~e3 gS 31.<;1;>f2 : );Ixd1 32 ..bd1 cS 33.~b3 " tLlxbS : 34.tLlxb6 w xbS 3S.il.gS ' 1-0
Velimirovic,Dragoljub Martz,William ' Vrnjacka Banja 1973
. 19.bxc4 l:te8 20.l'.!d1 '*'c5 21.'iYh4 b6 22.~e3 ~c6?! 23..Ml.h6 ~hS 24.ltdS! .\tb7 .2S.J:l.ad1 il.g7 ' 2SJ:t8d7! :am 27.iLxg7 st>xg7 " 28.J.:i1d4 J:tae8' 29.'itVf6+ ~gS 30.M h5 31.~>h2 :aea " 32.~g3! llces 33.~4! .\tea 34.~gS" [34.....L:d~ 35,~h6!with ~ate ong7] 1-0 ,:~
Spassky,Boris Fischer,Robert Reykjavik Wchm 19 72 (19)
1.e4 tLlf6 2.eS tLldS 3.d4 dS 4.tLlf3 , .Ml.g4 S.~e2 e6 S.O-O ~e7 7.h3 ~hS S.c4 tLlbS 9.tZic3 0-0 10.iLe3 dS11.cS .Ml.xf3 12..b f3 tLlc4 13.b31 tLlxe3 14.fxe3 bS 1S.e4! cS 1S.b4 bxc5 17.bxcS 'iWaS 18.tLlxd5 i.gS 19.~h51 cxdS 20..b f7+ [:2: 20.exdS] 20..Jlxf7 2U!.xf7 'iYd2! 22.flxd2 §i..xd2 23.J:l.af1 tLlcS 24.exd5= exdS 2S.n d7, .\te3+ 2S.~h1 A xd4 27.eS .\teS! . 2SJlxdS Ire8 29.J:le1 J:l.xeS 30.J:.dS! f2 li.c2+ 1J2-V;:
1.e4 tLlfS 2.eS tLldS 3.c4 tLlbS '4.d4 dS S.f4 ~fS S.tLlc3 dxeS 7.fxe5 eS S.tLlf3 i.b4 9•.td3 ~g4 10.0-0 tLlcS 11.c5 .Ml.xc3 12.bxc3 tLldS 13JWe1 . tLlde 7 14..rtb 1 n bS 15.tLlgS idS AImasi,Zoltan " , ' " 16.~xfS tLlxfS 17.~e4 'iYd7 1S.d5 Varga,Zoltan ,.; tLlce719.c4 cS 20.dS tLlg6 21.g4 " Budapest zt~pJayoif1 99 5 ( I) .' 1 tLlh6 22.J:l.b3 0-0 23.J:.bf3 bS 24.h4 1.e4 tLlf6 2.eS tLldS 3.d4 dS 4.tLlf3 :tfeS 2S.lLlxh7 tLlxh4 26.1:!h3 , 1-0 ~g4 5 •.Ml.e2 eS 6.0-0 il.e7 7.c4 tLlbS 8.h3 ~hS 9.tLic3 0-0 10.'.lte3 tLlSdi 11.exdS cxd6 12.b3 dS 13.cS tLlcS' Short,Nigel 14.b4 a6 1S.tLld2 .Ml.xe2 1S.'iWxe2 Timman,Jan A f6 17.tLlb3 tLle71SJUd1 tLlcS19.a3' ;' Tilburg 1991 (4) 1.e4 tLlf6 2.eS tLld5 3.d4 dS 4.tLlf3 g6 b6 20.tLla4 bxcS 21.tLlaxc5 tLlxc5 S.il.C4 tLlbS S..tb3 §i..g7 7:fle2 tLlc6 22.tLlxcS J:l.a723.tLlxaS '*'aB 24.bS S.o-O 0-0 9.h3! as 10.a4 dxe511.dxeS tLlb8 2S.tLlcS J.:!xa3 26.'ilfb2 J.:!aS tLld4 12.tLlxd4 ~xd4 13.l:re1 e6 27..§i.d2 J:l.a7 2S.jLf4 J:1.cS 29.b6 J:l.xa1 ! : 14.tLld2! tLldS 1S.tLlf3 ' 'iWc5 1S.'i!'e4 30.J:l.xa1 fic6 31.b7 tIeS 32 ...b bS 1-0: fib4 , 17.~c4! tLlb6 1S.b31 tLlxc4 . n xb833.J:l.aS 130
Modern Defence
Modern Defence (without c4) 1.c2 -e497-96
-
,
The development of the bishop on g7 and the pawn move to d6, signify that this is a close relative of the Pirc. However, the difference is that in the Modern the knight is absent from f6, or it develops to this square later on. When White pushes his pawn to c4, the game resembles the Qneen's Pawn Opening: in other cases it remains more in the realm of the semi-open games. Here we have a very elastic defence. Black almost ignores what White does and develops on his own account with a wide number of plans to choose from. This makes the Modern an ideal defence for those among you that don't want a system for which you need to learn a lot of established theory. Black sometimes chooses not to make the classical pawn move " .d6, preferring instead to set up a Modern/Caro-Kann hybrid with pawns on c6 and dS. However, usually Black does proceed with ... d6 (which can also be played on
the fIrst move) and ...~g 7. He can push his pawns to eS or to cS, or otherwise to c6-bS or a6-bS. Black may decide to develop the b8 -knight to d7 or to c6, and the g8-knight to f6 or e7. White is not urgently required to defend e4 as in the Pire, and therefore, he too has a wide variety of approaches available to him. As a result of all this, it is very diffIcult to systematically examine this chameleonic defence. 2. d2-d4 ~f8-g7 Now White can play 3.c4, which we will discuss in the second volume of this series. However, it is more common to play 3.lt:lf3 or 3 .It:lc 3 . A)
3. tLlg1-f3 4. c2-c3!?
d7-d6
The advance of the c-pawn, often already played on the 3rd move, is an option not available in the Pire: White supports the centre and takes the bite out of a possible ...b7-bS. However, this is not a developing move and White must content himself with a minuscule advantage in the centre. However, for players who enjoy a slow manoeuvring struggle it could be the right choice. 131
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 4 . ~e2 usually transposes to the Classical Pirc if Black plays .. .tbf6. 4. tlJgS-f6 5. ~f1-d3 0-0 6. 0-0 The results are slightly in White's favour, but Black's position offers many resources.
B) 3. tlJb1-c3 White proceeds naturally, reserving the option to aggressively push the f-pawn. 3. ... d7-d6
tlJbS-d7 S. g2xf3 'fVb6-a5 9. 0-0-0 Clearing the way for the b-pawn. 10. Wc1-b1 b7-b5 11. h2-h4 tlJd7-b6
'., ;.~. ~ '.~~ iiI.i
.E
. ~'
JIi ~ . ~;
~ "
.~
And it is not clear who will be the first to have a real threat against the opponent's king.
Or otherwise to continue in a less directly challenging way. The only drawback of the natural development of the knight to c3 is that it facilitates a counterattack by Black with ... b5-b4. B1) 4. f2-f4 Black can now play 4 .. .tbf6 ifhe wishes to enter the Pirc. However, he usually opts for the interesting plan 4. c7-c6!? 5. tlJg1-f3 ~cS-g4 6. ~c1-e3 'iYdS-b6 establishing an adventurous, but promising attack on the queenside. The following line is not forced, but reveals a lot about the position: 7. ~d1-d2 ~g4xf3
132
B2) 4. ~c1-e3 This is a very fashionable move in the Pirc, and hence also in the Modern Defence. In the spirit of the English Attack in the Sicilian, White prepares for "ilVd2 and 0-0-0. Usually Black postpones castling short, which could lead to a re-entry in the Pirc. This would not be a bad thing, if it did not give White the chance to use a simple plan of attack: to weaken the kingside by removing the fianchettoed g7 -bishop by means of ~ h6, with interesting chances of an attack against the black king. For this reason, Black prefers to respond with c7-c6 4 .... so as to harass the c3 -knight with .. .b5-b4. 5. 'tWd1-d2 b7-b5 And now it is natural for White to continuewith
Modern Defence 6.
~f1-d3
tiJb8-d7
The position is strategically complex and offers both players chances, even if results tend to favour White.
83)
4. tiJg1-f3
"
Spassky,Boris Olafsson.Fridrik Moscow Alekhi~~ mem 197 'j (I 7) , " 1.e4, g6 2.d4 A g7 3.e3 lbf6 4.it..d3 d6 S.f4 eS 6.tiJf3 Ag4 7.fxeS dxe5 ,8.Ag5 h6 9.~h4 g5 10.~f2 exd4 ,11.exd4 tiJe6 12.tiJbd2 tiJh5 13.~b5 tiJf4 14.0-00-0 15:. -a4 tiJe716JUe1 "tiJeg6 17.~f1 '.td7 18.'iYe2 , g4 ,19.lbe5 tiJxe5 20.dxe5lDgS 21.tiJe4 : ~g5 22/iJe3 tiJxe5 23.irxe7 'uae8 , 24.'iYdS l:eS 25.1h3 h5 26.1:1ad1 ' .teS 27.tiJd5 .!1f.xd5 2S.exd5 ' 1:1e2 29.'fIxa7 g3 30.hxg3 tiJg4 3Ule2 1:1xe2 32 •.be2 tiJxf2 33.1!fxf2 .i.e5 34.l:td3 :reS 3S.dS l:te1 + 3S ...td1 ,1l'gS 37.'iYd2 tIcS 3S.d7 :tdS 39.~b3 wg7 40.1:lf3 f5 41.~eS f4 42.gxf4 .tfS 43.<;t.?h2 h4 44.g4 'ffe4 45.~e3 'iWb4 4S.b3 'i.d4 47.'We2 'iYe548.Af5.tf649.~e8 1-0
Tatai,Stefano Timman,Jan " Amsterdam B 1970 (2)
A positional choice. Now Black can play 4. ... a7-a6 or 4. ... e7-e6 or otherwise transpose to the Pirc with 4. ... tiJg8-f6 White preserves the small advantage that is his birthright, but Black does not have to deal with any immediate threats. In these variations, more so than in the others, the player with the better strategic skill will win. Not counting tactical mishap along the way, of course.
1.e4 g6 2.d4 A g7 3.e3 d6 4.lbf3lDf6 5.lDbd2 0-0 , 6..ie2 lDc6 ' 7.0-0 e5 ,8.dxe5 ll:lxe5 9.ll:lxe5 dxe5 10.'ii'e2 b6 11.1:1e1 .tb712.A f1 \Wd713.tiJc4 • lUe8 14.f3 'a s 1S..te3 'ilie6 16.tiJa3 lted8 17.1:1ad1 ..if8 18.~bS 'i!fe6 19.'ii'b3 'iYxb3 20.axb3 e6 21.lIxd8 ' llxd8 22.hb6 l:td2 , 23.ll:lc4 "Ue2 24..ta4 lbd7 25.~e3 lDc5 26.1:te1 %:[xe1 + 27..be1 tiJd3 28..te3j.a6 29.tiJxa5 tiJxb2 30.ll:lxe6 ,tiJd1 ;31.j.bS tiJxc3 32.lDxeS ~d6 33.tiJg4 'j.d3 34.eS Jie7 ".' 3S.tiJe3 j/,g5 36..i.e6 ~f4 37.tiJd5 lDe2+ 38.Wf2 ~xh2 39.f4 tiJxf4 40.lbf6+
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I "
.•' Anand, Viswanathan Svidler,Peter Linares 1998 (2)
,
1.e4 96 2.d4 ~g7 3.lUe3 d6 4.k e3 a6 5'lUf3 b5 6.~d3 ' lUd7 7.e5 ~b7 S.e6 fxe6 9.lUg5 lUfS 10.0-0gg lUf6 1Ute1 'iVd712.~d2 h6 13.lUf3 J:XbS 14.a4 b4 15.tLle4 h1 tZlxd2 40.l:le2 tZlc4 41.11xe2 tZlxe3 42.tte2 [42 ... tZlxf5 43.tZlxe6 ' c6 44.I:rb6trc8 45Jlcl+-] .. 1-0
Dominguez,Lenier lvarichuk,Vasily . Barcelona 2006 (9)
1.e4 g6 2.d4 d6 3.tZlc3 i:.g7 4.~e3 a6 5.f4 b5 6.~d3 iJ:.b7 7.tZlf3 tZld7 S.e5 tZlh6 9.'iWe2 lUb6 10.0-0-0 'iWd7 11J~hg1 0-0 12.g4 tZlxg4 13.tZlg5 tZlxe3 14.'iVxe3 e6 15.'ti'h3 h6 16.tZlxf7 'fiixf7 17Jbg6 'iYxf4+ 18.w b1 1:tf7 19.J:!dg1 \thS 20.1:[6g4 " 'Uid2 21.'iYh5 .:tats 22.a3 I:re7 23.U.xg7 llxg7 24Jbg7 I:rf1 + 25.~xf1 wxg7 26.iJ:.d3 'ii'g5 27.'i¥eS dxe5 2S.dxe5 ~xe5 29.'\We7+ "'gS 30:~eS+ I.1;>g7 31.'i!t'e7+ I.1;>gS ' 32.~h7+ I.1;>hS 33 ..lkg6 , ~g7 34.~dS+ 'ilgS 35.'if'f6+ 'YWg7 36.'iWdS+ 'tlVgS 37.'iWxe7 tZld5 3S.'it'e5+ 'iWg7 39:ii'b8+ ~gS 40.'ii'e5+ 'iVg7 41:ifxe6 'i!Vf6 42.'iYxf6+ tZlxf6 43.~f5 w g7 44.~e1 134
tZleS 45.tZle4 ..be4 46 ..be4 tZld6' 47.~d3 a5 4S.~d2 Wf6 49.w e3
Polgar,Judit Shirov,Alexey Linares 1994 (7)
1.e4 g6 2.d4 .\kg7 3.tZle3 e6 4.lUt3 d6 5.iJ:.g5 'iVb6 6J:!b1 ~g4 7.i£.e3 .lkxf3 S.gxf3 'fIfe7 9.h4 e6 10.h5 d5 1Ulfd2 tZld7 12.b4 tZlgf6 13.h6 ~fS 14.~f4 'iWdS 15.~d3 1l.e7 16.lbe2 0-0 17.e3 b5 1S.Wf1 a5 19.a3 tZlb6 20.:!.e1 tZleS 21.i£.e5 tZld6 22.~g7 tZlde4 23 :~'e1 l:{eS 24.e5 axb4 25.axb4 l:l.a2 26:e'f4 ~d2 27.k b1 . lba4 2S.~g2 lUab2 29:il¥g4 lUa3 30.lUf4 tZlxb1 31.11xb1 lUd3 . 32.tZlxd3 J:txd3 33.I:ra1 trxe3 34.l:l.a7 J:l.e4 35 J~ ha1 J:l.xb4 36.'iI'f4 c5 37.11xe7 'iWxe7 3S.~f6 'iVe7 39.: a6 I:.xd4 40.'ilVg5 .l:ta4 41,%:ld6 %:taaS 42.l:l.e6 'iVa7 43.iJ:.dS f6 44 ..bf6 c4 45:Wg4 'iYf7 46:~'d4 treeS 47:il}'b6 J:[xe6 48.1IVxe6 1:IbS 0-1
Okhotnik,Vladimir Beliavsky,Alexander Hungary tt 2002/03 (9)
..
1.e4 d6 2.d4 g6 3.tZle3 g g7 4..\kg5 e5 5.dxe5 'fIfa5 6:iWd2 'iVxe5 7.lUd5 ~e6 S.O-O-O tZld7 " 9..\ke3 'iYeS 10..lkb5 lUf6 11.tZlxf6+ .b:f6 12.it.d4 .bd4 13:4Wxd4 0-0 14..b d7 'ifxd7, 15.~b11UeS 16.tZle2 a5 17.tZlf4 !1c4
Modern Defence
13:jt.92 'i b7 14.0-0 li:ldS 15..u.ad1 ' 1S.'fWd3 flaeS 19.'u'd2 b5 20.tLld5 ,.'fWb7 21 Jle1 b4 22.b3 l:r4e5 23.'ifd4 .' dl.xg21S.Wxg2 tLleS 17.li:lb3 .!:',tfdS , a4 24.f3 i.xd5 25.exd5 'iVe7 1S.'lWd5 'i!t.>hS ,19.J:rd2 A fS 20JUd1 : tLlhg7 21.a4 as 22.h4 'iVeS 23.a5 b5 :2SJ:tee2 axb3 27.axb3 'iWb7 2S.J:l.d3 1:[aS 29.J:rde3 .llxd5 30.l:rxe7 \'Vxe7 24.~b4 WiVc4 25.e3 J.:[ac8 2S.tLla1 31.lhd5 '(Wa7 0-1 ~c6 27.tLlc2 tLleS 2S.tLle3 li:l8c7 29.~f3 ' '¥:i'xf3+ 30.'~xf3 ~g7 3Utxd7 -, ~f7 32.l:rxdS l:rxdS Lasker,Emanuel 33.J.:[xdS tLlxdS 34.~e5 tLlb7 35..ibS Von Bardeleben,Curt Berlin m 1889/90 (I) li:laS 3S.tLld5 ~e6 37.tLlb4 tLlxbS 3S.axbS ~d7 39.li:lxaS eS 40lbd4 ,1.e4 g6 2.d4 ~g7 3.f4 e5 4.dxc5 'i'a5+ 5.~d2 ~xe5 S;~e3 tLlfS ' b4 41.exb4 tLldS 42.tLlc5+ ~eS 43.'i!t.>e3 ~e7 44.~d3 hS 45.~c4 g5 7.~d4 'fIIe7 S.e5 li:leS Ulfd3 tLlh5 4~.hxg5 hxg5 47.li:ldxeS ' 1-0 ) 0.tLle2 f5...11.tLld2 0-0 12.g3 bS
135
Chess Openinn Essentials - Volume I
Pirc Defence 1.(:2-c4 d7-d6 2.d2-d4 ~ g8-f6
3 . '!.Jb1-c3 g7-g6
gressively, or he can instead opt to begin with slow manoeuvring. In ascending order of popularity, the most common options are: A)
4. g2-g3
An underestimated variation. ~fS-g7 4. ... Now White solidly develops: 5. ~f1-g2 0-0 6. lLlg1-e2 e7-e5 With another type of game in mind, people are increasingly beginning to play 6 ... lLlbd7, which prepares ... c7 -c5. 7. h2-h3! tLlbS-c6 S. ~c1-e3
The Pirc Defence is named after the strong Yugoslav player Vasja Pirc, who was born in the early part of the 20th century, and it is characterized by the kingside fianchetto. However, first Black plays 1...d6 to prevent e4-e5, and then 2 ... lLlf6 provoking 3.lLlc3, in doing so preventing White from playing c2-c4, entering into the King's Indian. This is not to suggest that the Pirc has proved itself to be superior to the King's Indian: as always, it is simply a matter of taste. It should be said that White can also choose not to play 3 .lLlc3, and instead go for 3.£3 or 3 .~d3. In both these cases Black can decide not to fianchetto his f8 -bishop and instead respond in the centre with 3 ... e5, creating a different type of game. As in the Modern Defence, Black concedes the centre in hopes of undermining it at a later stage. Therefore this is an ambitious defence and, as a result, rather demanding to play. For his part, White can react ag136
If Black now takes on d4, h e allows his opponent active piece play. If Black plays mechanically, White obtains an unpleasant initiative with moves such as 0-0 and £'2-f4. Therefore this is a position which inspires differing assessments, depending on the taste of the commentator and ranging from equality to a small advantage for White. B)
4. ~c1-g5
An insidious move, even if compara-
tively uncommon. If Black allows, White will try ~d2-~h6 along the
Pirc Defence
lines of the 4.il.e3 variation. Otherwise, he can continue with £1-f4, aiming to play an Austrian Attack, but with the bishop on gS, given the pressure it applies on e7, the e4-eS advance is more effective. On the other hand, this takes a tempo, and it is not clear if all this is worth it. Black, who may not appreciate the presence of the bishop on gS, can give it a kick with ... h6, and ifhe chooses, eliminate it with the common manoeuvre ... gS and ... ttJf6-hSxg3. However, here it is not clear either if this is positive or negative, given the lost tempi and the weaknesses on the kingside. ~fS-g7 4. ... White can now continue with: 81)
812)
5 .... S. ~g5-hS 7. 'iYd2xhS
c7-cS ~g7xhS ~dS-a5
.i.1. .,. • ..... I. A... A ... ... ...... • "''iY
Black immediately begins a counterattack on the queenside. It is difficult to judge which is more dangerous: White's kings ide attack, or Black's on the queenside.
5. ~ d1-d2 82)
At this point, kingside castling seems dangerous because of White's intention to exchange off the g7 -bishop. Therefore: 811)
5. ... h7-hS gS-g5 S. il.g5-h4 7. ~h4-g3 ti:JfS-h5 By chasing the bishop we are heading for a complex middlegame, e.g. after 8.0-0-0.
5. f2-f4
c7-cS 5. Here also, it is better to postpone castling. b7-b5 S. ti:Jg1-f3 7. ~f1-d3 b5-b4 S. ti:Jc3-e2 il.cS-g4 9. 0-0 'iYdS-bS 10. Wg1-h1 White has a good centre, but Black has sufficient counterplay. 137
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
C) 4. ~c1-e3 Preparing for WW'd2 and 0-0-0.
The move 4.f4 - the Austrian Attackhas seen a decline in popularity, and as a result the 4 .~e3 variation is the most fashionable line at the moment.
The Austrian Attack 0)
c7-c6! 4 .... Black is correct to immediately seek counterplay on the queenside. After the natural4 ... ~g7 5.'*fd2 c6 (here also, as af ter 4.~g5, castling kingside would be dangerous because of iur.6 followed by h4-hS in the style of the Dragon Variation of the Sicilian) 6.lLJf3 (after 6 ..\ll6 ~xh6! 7. ~xh6 ~a5, you reach the position already seen in B12 ) 6... b5 7.ltd3 lLJbd7 8 .~h6 or 8.h3 the results tend to favour White. 5. 'ilVd1-d2 6. ~f1-d3
b7-b5 lLJbB-d7
The idea is that if White opts for lth6, Black will not waste a tempo, as he has not played ... ltg7. The resulting positions are complicated and they offer both sides chances. 138
4. f2-f4
The famous Austrian Attack's great popularity began in the I 950s and gradually became the most frequently played variation against the Pirc until the 1990s. White develops his pieces (lLJf3 and ~d3) behind a central expansion, preparing for a future assault on the black king, which is generally initiated by pushing the pawn to e5 at an opportune moment. This plan is very dangerous and Black must respond by advancing a pawn to e5 or c5: either immediately, or after suitable preparation. 4. ... ~fB-g7 5. ttJg1-f3 Now Black can counterattack the centre (with ... c5), or otherwise make noncommittal moves. 01) c7-c5 5 .... This pawn advance is inspired by tactical considerations: 6.dxc5 WW'a5! which attacks e4, winning back the pawn. After 7.ltd3 'lWxc5 a balanced position is
Pirc Defence
reached that is structurally reminiscent of the more solid Dragon positions. If White wants to play more aggressively, he chooses S. ~f1-b5+!? Weakening Black's control of the e6-square. ~cS-d7 S ....
7. S.
e4-e5 e5-eS
However, in the 1980s IO ... i.xd4! was discovered. If White takes the queen, Black gives perpetual check on f2 and e3. Therefore White usually relies on 10. ttJ c3xb5
but after 10.... 11. c2-c3 12. ttJg5xeS 13. ttJ eSxg7+
ttJfS-g4
8 .~xd 7 + is more solid, but after 8 ... ~xd7 9.dS dxeS 10.h3 e4!, Black maintains equality. At this point there are two variations to consider:
Black maintains equality notwithstanding his exposed king. 012)
011)
S.
...
f7xeS!?
For years this was thought to be a simple error because of 9.
ttJf3-g5
'iYdS-a5+ 'il'a5xb5 ttJbS-aS! 'it>eS-f7
~d7xb5
and now after 10.ttJxe6
S....
~d7xb5
This old line is sound and still being played. 9.
eSxf7+
'>PeS-d7!
The king is safer here than on f8! 10. ttJ c3xb5 11. ttJb5-c3 12. ttJf3xd4
'iWdS-a5+ c5xd4
both Black's queen on d8 and the g7 -bishop are under attack. 139
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I Now we have an intricate situation; even though hundreds of games have been played with this position it is still not clear who is attacking and who is defending. 02)
5.
The impetuous 7.eS is risky but playable. e7-e5!? 7....
0-0
6. 11i.f1-d3
The most common move; it defends e4 and in the event of e4-eS, it enables the d-pawn to recapture without allowing the exchange of queens. 6.eS seems to be premature. 6 ...te3 - which prepares for 'iVd2 and 0-0-0 - has its admirers, but practice has shown that 6 ... b6!, preparing for both the ... c7 -cS advance and ... ~b 7, gives Black sufficient counterplay. Instead, 6 .£Le2, which used to be played in the early days of the Austrian Attack, lacks bite because of 6 ...cS! 7.dxcS ~aS. Let's return to 6.£Ld3. Now the ... e7 -eS advance is no longer playable, and the other advance ... c7 -cS is weak because of 7.dxcS. As a result, Black usually prepares for the first with 6 ...tLlc6, or for the second with 6 ... tLla6. 021)
140
6. 7. 0-0
lbbS-c6
Now White can either take with the d-pawn and then push f4-fS, or he can take with the f-pawn and then advance his d-pawn to dS. For his part, Black can move his c6-knight to b4 or to d4; in both cases with satisfactory results. 022)
6. 7. 0-0 S. d4-d5 In response to 8 ... iLg4!?, is 9.i.c4!.
tLlbS-a6 c7-c5 J::raS-bS the latest craze
9. wg1-h1 The hyper-aggressive 9.eS!? or 9.fS!? is also possible. In Benoni fashion, Black now seeks counterplay on the queenside, which is
Pire Defence facilitated by the absence of the white pawn on c4 and because the knight on b4 harasses the bishop on d3. Yet at the same time, the manoeuvre 'fVel-h4 with the idea offS, jLh6 and liJgS can be very dangerous and practical results would appear to favour White.
Classical Variation E) 4. tLlg1-f3 White continues in simple fashion, giving priority to development. 4. ... 1ifS-g7 5. ..I1Lf1-e2 S .~e3 is also popular. The latter tends to lead to the 4 . ~e3 variation if White continues with 'ilVd2. However, a specific line exists in which White chooses a solid plan that starts with h 2-h3. An example is the variation S...c6 6.h3 0-0 7.a4 liJbd7 (7 ... dS!? loses a tempo, but it is interesting as it aims to take advantage of White's non-developing moves) 8.aS, with a small but unpleasant queenside initiative. 5. ... a-a 6. a-a We have reached the key position of the Classical Pirc.
various strategic plans. These generally involve putting White's centre under pressure either with .. .~g4 and ... liJc6, or more directly with the pawn advance ... c7 -cS . Alternatively, Black can search for play on the queens ide with ...c6. The variations below are indicative for each of the three different approaches. E1)
c7-c5 6 .... 7. d4-d5! Thus we arrive at positions which are typical of the Franco-Benoni. 7.
S. h2-h3
tLlbS-a6 tLla6-c7 b7-b6
9. a2-a4 10. ~cH4 White is slightly better off.
E2)
6. 7. ~c1-e3 S. d4-d5!?
~cS-g4
tLlbS-c6
The old main line 8.'ii"d2 is a little out of fashion: after 8 ...eS, neither 9.dS nor the simplifying 9.dxeS appears to give White anything special. S. ...
White doesn't have any immediate threats, so Black can choose b etween
iit.g4xf3
8 .. .liJb8!? seems provocative, but it makes sense now that White's centre has been compromised. 141
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
9. .l1i.e2xf3 tLlc6-e5 10. ~f3-e2 c7-c6 Attacking the head of the pawn chain seems best here, 11. a2-a41 ~ dS-a5 12. 1:[a1-a3! With the idea of 'ub3, leaving White with a small but insidious initiative, E3) c7-c6 6 .... is the most popular, White can prepare the pawn push e4-e5 with 7.h3 or 7,'u'e 1, but he usually proceeds with 7. a2-a4 which prevents b5, and White also has a4-a5 in mind, The aim is to take away all of Black's manoeuvring space on the queenside, In view of this, Black plays 7. a7-a5 S. h2-h3 tLl bS-a6 9. .l1i.c1-e3 tLla6-b4
Lasker,Emanuel Marshall,Frank New York rn 1940 (2)
,1.e4 dS 2.d4 tLlf6 3.tLlc3 g6 4.f3 i.g7; S.i.e3 tLlbd7 S.tLlge2 as HlVd2 cS ' S..lthS i.xhS 9.~xh6 'iVaS 10.wgd2 bS 11.tLlc1 ~ b7,12.tLlb3 'f!fc7 13.a4 ' b414.tLld1 a5 1S.tLle3 dS1S.eS tLlhS ' 17.g3 0-0 1S..lth3 e619.0-0 c5 20.f4 ; tLlg7 21J:tfd1 lUcS 22.tLlxcS tLlxc5 23.dxcS 'ilfxc5 24.'i!Vd4 fVxd4 2SJIxd4 tLlf5 26..bf5 gxf5 27.wf2 ' fS 2S.~g1 h5 29.h3 Wf7 30.g4 hxg4 31.hxg4 fxg4 32.exf6 wxfS 33.J:lxg4 J:1gS ' 34.c3 bxc3 35.bxc3 ~xg4 ' 36.tLlxg4+ <;.t>f5 37.tLle3+ WfS 3S.c4 llcS 39.cxd5 ~xd5 1f2-V2
Stulik,Vlastimil Pirc,Vasja
,'«;~i "
, Karlovy Vary 1948 (11) ,
1.e4 d6 2.d4 tLlfS 3.tLlc3 gS 4.tLlf3 , ~g7 S.~gS 0-0 S:ifd2 ' ~g4 7.h3 il.xf3 S.gxf3 e5 9.d5 c5 10.h4 hS : 11.0-0~0 tLlbd7 12.~h3 as 13.tLle2! Wic714Jlhg1 c4 .15.tLlg3 c31S.bxc3 "iVa5 17.wb1 tLlbS 1S.c4 'iWxd2 ' tl)xc4 ., 20.J:1d3 tLlh7 19.J:ixd2 21.tLlxh5 tLlxg5 22.hxg5 gxhS 23.gS : fxg6 24J:txgS IUS 25J:1g5 J:1h6 : ' 26Jld1 '.thS 27.l:Idg1 .tfS 2S.l:I5g2 ' tbd2+ " ", 0-1 :
~
Now White can either prepare the f2 -f4 advance with lO .tLld2, or develop normally with 10. ~d2 and 11.l:Iadl with that small advantage which is always nice to have, but against correct play does not guarantee anything substantial. Black could react with ... d7 -d5, to exchange off the e4-pawn and make the f5 -square available for the bishop on c8 . 142
' Kasparov,Garry " Topalov, Veselin WijkaanZee 1999 (4)
1.e4 dS 2.d4 tLlfS 3.tLlc3 gS 4.~e3 " ~g7?! S:tli'd2 cS S.13 b5 7.tLlge2 .tLlbd7 S.~hS j,xhS 9.'iWxhS ~b7 F~ ' 9 ... e5!?J 10.a31 e5 11.0-0-0 'fie7 , 12.'ittb1 as , 13.tLlc11 0-0-0 14.tLlb3: exd4!? 15.lbd4 c5 , 16.l:Id1 tLlb6 ~
Pire Defen ce
'17.93 ~bS 1S.tDaS?! [;::: 18 .~h3!?j" 1S... ~a8 19.A h3 dS 20.'iff4+ ~a7 21.r1he1 d4 22.tDdS tDbxdS 23.exdS 1iVdS 24.l:!xd4! cxd4? (;::: 24 ...'iitb6!=] c2S.11e7+!I ~bS 2S:iWxd4+ ~xaS 27.b4+ ~a4 28:~c31? [28 J:ta7!] " ' 2S ..:ifxdS 29.: a7 .\tb70 30.!i:xb7 iic4?1 [30 .. J:the8!] 3UVxfS Wxa3 '[;::: 3 l...J:l:dl +] 32:ilVxaS+ , \Et>xb4 ,33.c3+! ~xc3 34.'ifa1 + : 'l.t.>d20 '3S.'i!fb2+., 'l.t.>d1 3S.~fll lld20 37.l;id7! 'l!xd7 3S..bc4 bxc40 '39.iVxhS l:td3 40.'iWa8 c3 41.'lIk'a4+ .We1 42.f4 fS 43.Wc1 l:td2 44.'ifa7 1-0
Svidler,Peter Ivanchuk,Vasily Spain tt 2006 (I)
,1.e4 dS 2.d4 tDfS 3.tb c3 gS 4.Jie3 ;'cS S.h3 1;.g7 S.g4 bS 7.eS tDfd7 S.f4 tDbS 9.tDf3 tDSd71 0.S;t.,d3 b4 11.tDe4 tDdS 12.~d2 cS 13.tDfgS ~ b6 14.c4 bxc3 1S.bxc3 .\taS 1SJlb1 ..b d3 17J!xb6 tDSxbS 1S.exdS hS 119.tDxc5 tDxc5 20.dxc5 0-0 21.~f3 ;.tc4 22.cxbS hxgS 23.b7 J:1abS ' 24.~cS it.xa2 25.0-0 ' exdS 2S.lia1 AeS 27.l~:xa7 gxf4 2SJ~aS -ieS ' 29JlxbS 'uxbS 30.'ifc7 1-0
Spassky.Boris , Fischer.Robert ReykjavikWchm 1972 (17)
1.e4 dS 2.d4 9S 3.tDc3ltJfS 4.f4 it.g7 :5.tDf3 c5 6.dxcS [6.e5 lbfd7 ·7.exd6 c~d4 8.tDbS 0-0 9.lbc7 tDcs 10,tDxaS ''ifxd6 11 ..~.d3 · . tDc6 12.0-0 ' $.c6 '.' ' 13 .tDgS i.dS 14.fS ,l;[xa8.l S.fXg6 hxg6 . 16.'iWg4 tDxd31 icxd3 f6 lS .tDf3 Af7.
"""
...'
;.
"~
..
19.1fJh4 tDeS 20.'i!fg3 'iWd7 21..tf4 gS 22 ..txgS fxgS 23.lfJfS A g6 H .tDxg7 tDf7 2sJhfl Wxfl 26.'ife5 ' .txd3 27.11dl .l:lg8 28 Jhd3 J:lxg7 29.11xd4 ~e6 30.'i¥xe6+ ~xe6 KramnikGrischuk, Wijk aanZee 2005 ('I,- V, . 67)) 6 ...~aS 7.Ad3 'iifxcs S:@'e2 0-0 9,Ae3 'i¥aS 10.0-0 it..g4 1U'1ad1 lfJcS 12.Ac4 lfJhS 13.i.b3 .bc3 14.bxc3 'ti'xc3 15.fSlfJfS1S.h3 .bf3 17JWxf3 lfJaS 1S.'ud3 'ilc7 19.~hS lfJxb3 20.cxb3 \\VcS+ 21.'iith1.'i!feS 22.i.xfS l:txfS 23.J:te3 l:!.cS 24.fxgS hxgS 2S:Yi'f4 'iWxf4 2SJ:i.xf4 tDd7 27.lif2 tile5 2S.wh2 llc1 29Jiee2 lbc6 30J Ic2 .l:(e1 3UUe2 1%a1 32.Wg3 wg7 33J :Icd2 J:tf1 34.: f2 .tIe1 35J Ife2 .l:lf1 3S.:te3 a6 37.r%c3 • 'ue1 3SJlc4 n f1 39J:ldc2 J:1a1 40.lU2 l:te1 41 J Uc2 g5 42.'uc1 J:te2 43.:::t1c2 l:.e1 44 ..l:lc1 J:!e245.I:1c2 1/2-Y2
Karpov,Anatoly ' Kortc!m.0i, Viktor BaguioCityWchm 1978 (32)
1.e4 d6 2.d4 lfJfS 3.lbc3 g6 4.tDf3 it..g7 S.~e2 0-0 S.O-O cS 1.dS lfJaS S.~f4 tDc7 9.a4 b6 10J~e1 ~b7 11.i.c4 tDhS 12.~gS tDfS 13.i¥d3 as 14.J:!ad1 J:lbS 1S.h3 lbd7 1S.'/We3 ·it.aS 17...IkhS b51S..b g7 wxg7 19...tf1 tDfS 20.axbS axbS . 21.tDe2 .tb7 22.tDg3 :raS 23.c3 .!:[a4 24.Ad3 '!!faS 2S.eS dxe5 2S:i!'xeS tDxd5 27...txbS tla7 2S.tDh4 .tcS 29 ...te2 ~eS 30.c4 tDb4 3Ubcs ~bS 32.~f1 llcS 33:iligS >t>h8 34Jtd2 lLics 3S.'iIk'hS l:tg8 3S.tDf3 'tWfS 37:lWe3 >t>g7 3S.tDgS .ltd7 39.b4 'i!\YaS 40.bS tDaS 41.b6 l:tb7 x ,, 1-0 143
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Caro-Kann Defence 1.e2-e4 c7-c6
tected. And if we look a little closer, w e notice that the e4-pawn is the strategic linchpin around which all semi-open openings are based. Let's have a look at the various starting pOSitions . • in the Alekhine :
When Nimzowitsch wrote during the 1920s that the Caro-Kann Defence is the refutation of l.e4, he was either kidding or he just wanted to stir the stagnant waters of a theoretical approach that resisted all attempts at innovation under the banner of Tarrasch's rigid and dogmatic principles. Nimzowitsch knew that if you want to rock the boat you need to exaggerate somewhat. The proof that Nimzowitsch did not fully believe his pronouncement is demonstrated by the fact that he continued playing l.e4 on a fairly regular basis after making this remark! What he really meant was that it isn't compulsory to answer l.e4 with I .. .eS and that chere are many pocenlial stralegies besides pure frontal available opposition based on simple space control. In this sense I .. .c6 is conceptually very ambitious. The e4-pawn, unlike its colleague to the immediate left, is unpro144
with I ... ttJf6, the e4-pawn is attacked immediately, but this leaves White with a sound space advantage; • in the Scandinavian:
with I ...dS, Black immediately wants to exchange his d-pawn and create a pawn majority on the kingside, but in doing so he will either lag behind in development (2.exdS 'tlHxdS 3.ttJc3) or, in the line 2.exdS ttJf6 3.d4 ttJxdS 4.c4 ttJb6, his knight on b6 is far removed from the action;
Caro-Kann Defence
• in the French Defence :
after 1...e6, the e4-pawn is threatened on the second move when Black continues with L.d5. However, now White often advances the pawn to e5, keeping the centre closed. In the Closed French, it is a good thing that the c8-bishop cannot speak, as it has plenty to grumbleabout;
after I .. .c5, Black prevents the two central pawns from standing side by side, usually attacking the e4-pawn on his fourth move (3.d4 cxd4 4.4:lxd4 4:lf6) , but often at the expense of his own king's safety. Presented in this light, the Caro-Kann appears to be a perfect defence. 2. d2-d4 d7-d5
• in the Pirc Defence :
with the move 1.. .d6, Black prevents the advance of the e-pawn's to e5 in order to attack it on his second move. But the drawback of this system is that White can successfully maintain his two central pawns side by side on e4 and d4; • in the Sicilian Defence:
Here White's options are limited by the fact that the e4-pawn is threatened. The exchange 3.exd5 is excellent for White in the Scandinavian. In the Caro-Kann, after 3 ... cxd5 Black achieves a central pawn majority. As for 3.e5, it gains space, but unlike in the Advance Variation of the French the c8-bishop has nothing to complain about here and it can go straight to f5. The remaining option is to defend the 145
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 pawn with 3.lLlc3 or with 3.lLld2 and after 3 ... dxe4 4.lLlxe4, Black can safely continue his development, attacking the unprotected knight on e4 with 4 ... ~fS, or with 4 ... lLld7 followed by s ... lLlgf6. In real life, things are not so simple: in the first place 3.eS and 3.exdS, even considering the previously discussed limitations, do not allow Black to take equality for granted. Furthermore, in the main line, even though the absence of the e-pawn takes some of the sting out of White's play, it is also true that in the ensuing long positional battle White obtains a spatial advantage anyhow, and a comfortable position. This might not be so easy to convert into a win, but it is also true that the risks oflosing are minimal. As a result, the Caro-Kann has gained a reputation as a very solid defence suitable for positional players. All this is true, but beware if your opponent chooses 3 .eS, the Advance Variation in particular if h e replies to 3 ... ~fS with the aggreSSive 4.lLlc3 .
A)
Here White intends, after the thematic 2. ... d7-dS to continue with 3. e4xdS c6xdS 4. c4xdS and if Black captures with his queen, to transpose to a favourable line of the Sicilian with 2.c3 (!). If Black plays the more accurate 4. ... lLlg8-f6 White can attempt to keep the dS -pawn with S .~bS+ ~d7 6 .~c4, or try with S. iLlb1-c3 to transpose to favourable lines of the Panov-Botvinnik Attack (see below), advancing his pawn to d4 at the most opportune moment. This is not as academic as it may seem: A1)
You will be dealing with one of the sharpest and most complex lines found in all opening theory! 1. e2-e4 c7-c6 Besides occupying the centre with 2.d4, White has other interesting options. 146
2. c2-c4!?
S....
97-g6
Curo-Kunn Defence
Compared to the similar line in the Panov-Botvinnik Attack, White, instead of advancing d2-d4, could decide to defend the d5 -pawn with either ~b3 and ke2 -f3 or kc4, and it is difficult for Black to regain the pawn. A2) ttJf6xd5 5 .... In order to avoid the risk of not being able to recoup the pawn, Black usually captures on d5 right away. 6. ttJg1-f3 ttJb8-c6 7. d2-d4
nings, even if they are not part of your repertoire. For as much as we study or prepare for a particular type of game, sooner or later we will be confronted with unpredictable and ever-changing situations which require us to think for ourselves. Specialized preparation is all very fine, but by cultivating a more general awareness we develop mental .elasticity', which is a fundamental requirement for a good chess player. Once we admit that it is impossible to know everything about everything, we can reach a suitable compromise by learning a little about everything, and everything about a little. B)
Now 7 ... ..\1Lg4 transposes to a line of the Panov-Botvinnik Attack, which we will look at later. However, Black could also play the solid 7. ... e7-e6 and, incredibly we end up on SemiTarrasch territory with possible transpositions to the Queen's Gambit Accepted! In addition, from the PanovBotvinnik Attack we may transpose to the Nimzo-Indian. All of this should suffice to convince us that opening theory is a coherent whole and not a group of segmented compartments, as is commonly believed. It is for this reason that, in order to have a full grasp of what you are doing, you should have a general understanding of ope-
2. d2-d3
This is a typical move in the King's Indian Attack, and it is playable against the French Defence and some lines of the Sicilian. But more frequently it features in 1.tt:Jf3 followed by a kingside fianchetto and e4: therefore we're talking about a King's Indian with an extra tempo, and hence the name. d7-d5 2. ... 3. ttJb1-d2 Now Black may occupy the centre with 3 .... e5, or he can continue with 3 .... g6. The game assumes the character of a 147
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 slow positional battle with chances for both sides, and tactics are postponed until the middlegame.
C)
2. tLlb1-c3 3. tLlg1-f3
d7-dS
White's 2nd and 3rd moves can, of course, be played in reverse order. The idea behind White's move order is that if Black mechanically plays along the lines of the main line Caro-Kann with 3 ...dxe4 4.tLlxe4 .ft.j5?!, there follows S. tLlg3 Jl.g6? (the lesser of two evils is 5 ... Jl.g4!?), 6.h4! (with 6.d4 we are back in the normal variations) 6... h6 7.tLleS! ilh7 8.VJiJhS g6 9 .Jl.c4 (threatening mate) 9... e6 1O.'ii'e2
3 . ... ..IiLc8-g4! This move implicates that Black is completely willing to give up the two bishops, as White often plays the equally natural 4. h2-h3 Now 4 .. .~h5 is playable, but it leads to complications that aren't to the average Caro-Kann player's taste : h e is more likely to enjoy 4. iLg4xf3 S. 'iiUd1xf3 e7-e6!
Black has a solid centre and has freed himself of the bad light-squared bishop. 5 ... tLlf6 followed by ... e6 is also possible. A slow strategic battle will follow with chances for both players. So we have finally come to the most common line, which, as we said, is 2. d2-d4 d7-dS
and the bishop on h7 is not a pretty sight! However, Black is better off profiting from the knight's placement on f3 by playing the natural developing move 148
Caro-Kann Defence
White must decide what to do about his e-pawn. Ignoring the curious 3.f3 which, by the way, is not to be underestimated, he has three choices: 1) advance it: the Advance Variation; 2) exchange it: the Exchange Variation and the Panov-Botvinnik Attack; 3) defend it: the Main Line.
," Tiviakov,Sergey ."' Dreev,Alexey
'v ' ;,t"
<
J:1xe1+ 24Jbe1 tbxb2 25.lleS+ 'i'xe8 2S.il.xe8 llxe8 27.~c5 bS 2S..td4 tbc4 29.1It'gS tbeS 30.hS hS 31.',*"e3 g5 32.f4 gxf4 33.ifxf4 .tIeS 34.'fllfS idS 3S.wh2 :1I.g7 3S.a4 .ik.f6 . '37.c;i;>h3 ~g7 3ag4 i.f6 39.g5 hxg5 40.hS g4+ 41.c;i;>g2 ~f8 42.h7 i.g7 43 ..be5 llxe5 " 44.1!t'd7 .tte7 45.'ifdS+ J:!.eS 4S.'ii'dS+ 1:J.e7 .47.'fllhS lle2+ 4S.';t>f1 hhS 49.hS'iW+ " " 1-0
'".
Gothenburg Ech-tt 2005 (6)
1.e4 cS 2.d3 d5 3.lLld2 'fIIc74.tbgf3 tbd7 5.exd5 cxdS S.d4 eS 7.~d3 ,tbe7 8.0-0 g6 9.J:e1 · ~g7 10.tbf1 tbcS 11.c3 0-0 12..tgS e5 13.tbe3 tbbS 14.dxe5 tbxeS 1S ..tf4 tbxf3+ 1S.Vi'xf3 "cS 17.tbc2 i.d7 1S.tbd4 ~c5 19.'ilfg3 l:!.feS 20~dS 'iWcS , 21.h4 .tba4 22.tbb5 bbS 23.Jiixb5
Popovic,Aleksandar Zivkovic,Dejan Belgrade 2005 (4)
1.e4 cS Vbc3 d5 3.tbf3 ~g4 4.h3 .hf3 SJi'xf3 eS S.d4 dxe4 7.lbxe4 1!t'xd4 S.c3 'iWb6 9.Ag5 h6 10.i.h4 lbd7 11.0-0-0 g5 ; 12 ..tg3 1!YaS 13JIxd7 ~xd7 14.'iYxf7+ i.e7 15.i.C4. ~S1S.'i'f5+ weS17.lld1 1-0
149
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Caro-Kann Advance Variation 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e5
After 3 .e5, the immediate
3. ...
~cB-f5
is the most natural, but 3 ... c5!?, a useful move for players who wish to avoid a lot of theory, could also be a good idea: compared to the French, Black has lost a tempo, but his potentially bad bishop can still be developed to f5 or g4 . However, after 4.dxc5! - an ugly but effective move Black has difficulty winning back the pawn and the results are sufficiently in White's favour. Let's return to 3 ... i l.f5 . Now White can play several moves. A) 4. li:lg1-f3 A solid choice, championed by Nigel Short. e7-e6 4. 5. ~f1-e2 c6-c5 li:lbB-c6 6. c2-c3 7. 0-0 150
For decades, opening manuals have pronounced that Black is in effect playing an improved version of the French, with the bishop on f5 instead of c8. However, this has been revealed to be a somewhat blinkered analysis. Recently we have come to realize that the loss of two tempi ( ... c6-c5 and indeed .. .i1l.f5) make it possible for White to develop a small but unpleasant initiative which has produced encouraging results. B)
4. h2-h4!?
With this poisonous move, White gains space on the kingside and threatens to seriously harass the f5-bishop. Indeed, the naturaI4 ... e6?? loses the bishop after g2 -g4, £1-f3 and M -bS. After 4 ...h6 5.g4, if Black continues with the normal-looking 5 ...i1l.h7?! (5 ... ~d7! is the right move), White obtains optimal play on the light squares with 6.e6! fxe6 7.i1l.d3.
Caro-Kann - Advance Variatian
Black's most common move is h7-h5 4 .... and now it is not dear which of the two h-pawns is the weaker. At this point White responds with the committal 5. c2-c4!?
which is considered to be much better if played at this point than on the move before, because White has more comfortable access to the gS -square. If Black now takes on c4, he gains control of the key dS-square, but at the same time he gives White the important e4-square. If Black dithers, White will have the usual initiative on the queenside. White's results are fairly good and it is strange that this variation is not played more often, especially considering that there is not too much theory to study. C)
4. tt:lb1-c3
This aggressive move allows White to control e4, reserving g2-g4 for a better moment later on. At this stage, all sorts of moves have been tried, among which 4 .. .'i¥d7, 4 .. .hS, 4 .. .''»Yb6, and recently also the interesting 4 ...a6. However, the most popular move by far is still e7-e6 4. 5. g2-g4 Now yes! A f5-g6 5. 6. tt:lg1-e2!
White seeks to harass the g6-bishop with tt:lf4 and/or h2-h4. However, this takes several tempi and Black responds thematically in the centre: 6. ... c6-c5 In order to dissuade White from the idea of tt:lf4. 6 ... tt:le7 and 6 .. .f6 are also playable. 7. h2-h4 7.A e3!? with the idea of 8.dxcS contains a drop of poison too, but the text move is more common. Now Black gives the bishop some breathing space by advancing his h-pawn, or by capturing on d4. To give you an idea of the complexity of the variations that ensue, you only need to look at this line: lSI
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I 7.... a. tlJe2xd4 9. f2-f4! 10. ~f1-bS+ 11. f4-fS! 12. J:th1-f1!
eSxd4 h7-hS hSxg4 tlJba-d7 J::thaxh4 !:th4-hS!?
Even if the 4.i.e3 variation is still in its infancy, the following move sequence is usually seen as the main line. 4. ... e7-e6 S. tlJb1-d2 tlJba-d7 S. ~f1-e2 tlJga-e 7
with unclear play. 4. ~e1-e3
D)
The results for White after 7.f4 or 7.lt:lgf3 are encouraging, even if it is too early to speak of an indisputable advantage for White.
Morozevich,Aleiander Asrian.Karen . Fugen tt 2006 (5)
Speaking of uncharted waters, this was played in 2002 by Garry Kasparov. His distinguished patronage is reason in itself to take this strange move seriously. Predictably, in the following years this variation became very fashionable and many of the top players in the world are now exploring its deeper mysteries. The idea of 4.~e3 is to defend b2 with s.'tlfcl if Black plays 4 .. ..~b6; the second idea is to make the freeing pawn advance ... c6-cs more difficult if Black prepares for this with 4 ... e6. 152
. ~
1.e4 e6 2.d4 dS 3.e5 ~f5 4.tlJf3 e6 5...te2 tlJe7 6.c3 tlJd7 7.tlJh4 ~g6 . a.tlJxg6 hxg6 9.lt:ld2 tlJf510.tlJf3 . tlJh4 11.lt:lxh4 J:[xh4 12.g3 :ha 13.0-0 i;..e7 14.~d3 'iie7 15.lj'e2 cS " 16.~e3 0-0-0 17.a4 ~ba 1a.aS.trcS .,19.:fe1 gS 20.'Wg4 'We6 21.b4 c4 22.b5 'iixbS 23~c2 "ilVc6 24.~xgS f5 25.exf6 . gxf6 26.~f4+ ~d6' 27..b4 fIIc7 28..bd6 'Wxd6 29..tre1 " .trhe8 30..bd7 'li'xd7 31.1Wf4+ ~aa ' 32.i¥xf6 l:te7 33.:e5 .trceS 34.:ae1 . a6 3S.h4 .trf7 36.'li'g6 .trefa 37.fllxe6 ' 'iVa4 3a:t!fxd5 :xf2 39.:b1 J:l.b2 ; 40.:be1 J:[cS 4UWf3 J:tg8 42.g4 "itcs 43:iYg3 1;a7 44.g5 · :h8 : 45 ..tr5e2 nbS 46Jle6 . 'iVc8 47.g6
Caro-Kann - Advance Variation d
rlxaS 4S.g7:gS 49J~g6 'iffS SO.llf1 fxeS 9.i..d3 .bd3 10:ti'xd3 ~d6 'ife4 SUlg4 'ife6 52.:e1 "iYfS , 11.f4 ttlfS 12.ttJf3 ttJbd7 13.'ifgS+ ~dS14.ttJeS 1-0' S3.llf1 'iWe6 S4.11b1 'iffS S5.J:.b2 1:.a1+ S6.>l;>h2 'i!i'dS 57.1:.g2 'fif7 SS.l:U4 'ifc7 S9.dS l:ld1 SO:iff2+ bS " Kasparov,Garry S1.llg3 : xdS62.J::tf7 lld7 S3.llxd7 ·' Karpov,Anatoly ,'ifxd7 " S4.li'fS as 65.hS 'WeS Linares 2001 (5) 'SS:iWgS a4 S7.hS , 'iWe2+ SS.llg2 1.e4 c6 2.d4dS3.eS .if5 4.ttJc3 e6 , ,' tte4 S9.'ifg4 , 'iVe5+ 70.ng3 'iVf6 " S.g4 ~gS 6.ttJge2 ,ttJe7 7.ttJf4 cS 7U!fgS 'ii'dS 72.h7 1-0 8.dxc5 ttJd7 9.h4 ttJxeS 10.$..g2 h5 lUWe2 ttJ7cS !'/ 12.ttJxg6 ·o ttJxgS j, ' Kramnik~ Vladimir 13.i.gS 1I.e7 14.gxhSttJf8 ,lS.ttJbS . ttJd7 " 16.h6 ' ttJxc5 17.1I.f4 wfS '. Leko,Peter Brissago Wch m 2004 (14) .. 1S.hxg7+ wxg7 19.0-0-0 wfS 20.'.tb1 as 21.ttJc7 .l:1c8 22.1I.xd5 , i1.e4 c6 2.d4 dS 3.eS .tf5 4.h4 hS exd5 23 ..llxd5 'iWxc7 24~xc7 llxc7 5.g4 ~d7 S.ttJd2 c5 ,.1.dxcS eS 'S.ttJb3 ~xc5 9.ttJxc5 'it'aS+ 10.ca, 25.llf5 l:td7 2S.c3 fS 27..l:gl ttJdS :1fxcs 11.ttJf3 ttJe 7 ,12..ltd3 ttJbcS ' 2S:iWg4 weS 29..l:1h5'l::rtS , 30.llxcS. ..txc531.'iWhS+ 1-0 ; .13.1I.e3 'WaS 14.1Ikd2 ttJgS 1S.~d4 ttJxd4 lS.cxd4 'it'xd2+ 17.'i!i>xd2 ttJf4 ., 1S..l:acl h5 19.11hgl ~cS 20.gxhS Morozevich;Alexander 'ttJxhS 21.b4 as 22.a4 wdS 23.ttJgS lvanchuk,Vasily ~eS 24.bS ttJf4 2S.bS ttJxd3 2S.wxd3 J:.cS 27JhcS+ , >l;>xc8 Calvia 01 2004 (4) ' ,2S.1:.c1+ ~cS 29.ttJxf7 J:!.xh4 1.e4 cS 2.d4 dS 3.e5 ~fS 4.f4 eS ,30.ttJd6+ '· wdS ' 31.:g1 llh3+ 5.ttJf3 c5 S..te3 cxd4 7.ttJxd4 ttJe7 32.~e2 lla3 33 ..c.xg7 J:[xa4 34.14 S.i.bS+ ttJd7 ,9.0-0 as 10...te2 g5 11.g4 gxf4 12.gxfS ttJxfS 13.ttJxfS ;J:!.a2+ 3S.<M3 lla3+ 36.Wg4 lld3 37.fS J:!.xd4+ 38.'it'gS exf5 39.wfS Jxe3 14.ttJc3 llgS+ lS.whl .g5 J:[g440..!'lc711h441.ttJf7+ 1-0 1S.~f3 ttJxeS 17:ife2li'xf5 1S..bd5 'ii'h3 19.~xb7 lla7 .20..tf3 il.hS 21.ttJe4 we7 22:tJ'e1 fS 23:i;'b4+' Gelashvili, Tamaz ~ 24:iWd4 "ttJxf3 2S.'it'f6+ weS .~ Nauryzgmev,Amangcldy Turin 012006 (I) .,.. , 2S.1be6+ wfS 27.1ff6+ " J:[f7 1.&4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.eS 1I.fS 4.h4 hS 2S.1t'dS+ ""g7 29..!'lgl + ~hS 5.g4 ~e4 S.f3ii.gS 7.hS ~h7 S.e6 . , 30.ttJfS " , . 0-"
,.
153
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Caro-Kann Exchange Variation and Panov-Botvinnik Attack 1.c4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.cxd5
3. e4xdS
c6xdS
No one ever seems to think of it, but 3 ... 'lWxdS is also playable, transposing to the Scandinavian. Recapturing with the c-pawn usually leads to the Panov-Botvinnik Attack. However, we would like to make note of the move which helped Fischer obtain his famous victory against Petrosian in the USSR vs Rest of the World match in 1970: 4. ~d3, the so-called Exchange Variation. White prevents 4 ...~fs. After 4 ...l2Jc6 S.c3 tLlf6 6 .~4 ~g4!? 7.~b3 Black can maintain equality with 7 ... ~d7, 7 .. .'~c8, or also with 7...tLlaS.
4. c2-c4 This introduces the Panov-Botvinnik Attack. The diagrammed pOSition has the characteristics of a Queen's Gambit, with the difference that there is no black pawn on c7 and no white pawn one2. 154
Who is better off? It is difficult to say Results are similar to those of the Queen's Gambit. White has the slightly better statistical performance that is his colour's privilege. Strategically. it is as if Black has played ...,'jc7-c5xd4 and White has recaptured with the e3-pawn. It is true that the ... cS advance is a freeing move in many variations of the Queen's Gambit, but it is also true that Black is in no hurry to take on d4, which would facilitate White's development, in particular of the bishop on c 1. This subtle delaying strategy is common in many lines of the Rubinstein Variation (4.e3) of the Nirnzo-Indian Defence, which we will look at in the next volume. It is, therefore, no surprise that there are many transpositions from the Panov-Botvinnik Attack to the NimzoIndian when Black plays ... ~b4. As said, a common transposition is to the Semi-Tarrasch (l.d4 dS 2.c4 e6 3.tLlf3 dS 4.tLlc3 cS), but this depends on the willingness of the players to cooperate, as there are many lines here that preserve the characteristics of the Panov-Botvinnik Attack - in which White advances the pawn to cS, or Black plays .. .~g4. 4. ... ItJgS-f6 S. ItJb1-c3 Here Black has three options:
Caro -Kann - Exchange Variation and Panov - Botvinnik Attack A)
5. 6. tDg1-f3
e7-e6 iLfS-e7
Solid but slightly passive. 6 ...£.b4, along Nirnzo-Indian lines, is more ambitious. 7. c4-c5!? White seeks to exploit his queenside pawn majority - a typical but risky approach in many lines of the PanovBotvinnik Attack. 7.cxd5 would transpose to the Semi-Tarrasch. 7. 0-0 S. ~f1-d3 b7-b6 9. b2-b4 a7-a5 10. tDc3-a4! tDbS-d7 11. a2-a3 with a position that is not easy to evaluate. White has achieved his strategic objective, but his delayed development gives Black excellent chances of counterplay based on an ...e6-e5 pawn break. B)
5 ....
g7-g6
The central pawn structure is reminiscent of the Griinfeld Defence, but the absence of the white e-pawn naturally means that this is another kettle of fish. 6. c4xd5 iLfS-g7! The natural 6 ... tDxd5 is considered dangerous because of 7.~b3 <1Jxc3 8.~c4! e6 9.bxc3 and White has the advantage, even if not as big as theory suggests. 7. ~d1-b3!
Thus White makes it more difficult to recapture the dS-pawn. 7. ... 0-0 Now the most popular line is S. ~f1-e2! tDbS-d7 9. iLe2-f3! tDd7-b6 10. tDg1-e2 ~cS-g4! 11. iLf3xg4 tDf6xg4 12. a2-a4 a7-a5 13. 0-0 ~dS-d6 14. ~c1-f4 ~d6-b4 and Black has enough counterplay.
C)
tDbS-c6 5 .... This reserves the greatest amount of options. Black applies pressure to the centre and leaves the diagonal open for the bishop on c8. C1)
6. iLc1-g5
155
Chess Dpeninn Essentials - Volume
Black can respond to this direct approach with the classical 6 ..., e7-e6 but there is also the paradoxical 6 ... ~e 6 or the aggressive 6 .. ."~a5. Each option results in a complicated game for both players.
C2) 6. 0g1-f3 After this solid move, if Black doesn't want to head into variations of the Queen's Gambit or the Nimzo-Indian with 6 ... e6, he can maintain the tension by playing 6..., ~c8-g4 This move has the virtue of putting pressure on the centre, and the defect of weakening the light squares on the queenside. Paradoxically for such an aggressive line, after the almost forced sequence 7. e4xd5 tLlf6xd5 S. 'ifdl-b3! .§!.g4xf3 9. g2xf3 e7-e6! 9...t21b6 1O.~e3 e6 11.0-0-0 gives White the advantage.
10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 156
~ b3xb7 ~fl-b5+
~ b7-e6+1
0e6xd4 0d4xb5 loteS-e7
~c6xb5
~ dS-d7
0e3xd5+
Vi'd7xd5 e6xd5
~b5xd5
We have entered an endgame which the old opening manuals declared to be advantageous for White. This opinion held sway in spite of the doubled pawn on f3, because of White's queenside majority and Black's badly coordinated pieces (not to mention the isolated pawns on d5 and a7). In reality, hundreds of games have demonstrated that Black equalizes easily. The percentage of draws is unusually high: 65% against 35% for the entire Caro-Kann Defence.
", Fischer,Rooert "';-'r':' " Petrosian,Tigran " ".
Belgrade ,URS-WorId 1970 (I)
·1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4...ltd3 ,tLle6 5.e3 0f6 6..§!.f4 ~g4 7.'iib3 0a5 S:ifa4+ i..d7 9:iWe2 e6 10.tLlf3 ~b6 11.a41 [Fischer's novelty, in ~rder to prevent the exchange of the bishops] ' ,11 ..J'l eS 12.tLlbd2 tLle6 13.~b1 tLlh5 . :14.JLe3 h6 15.tLle5 tLlf616.h3 jl,d6 17.0-0 <Me lS.f4 i..eS Hi.~f21 Wie7: .[19 ...&6 20.f5 gxf5 21..~.xf5 ' exfS 22.'ii'xf5 'ifd8 23, ~h4+- Fischer] 20...2.h4 tLlg8 21.f5 tLlxe5 22.dxe5 , ~xe5 23.fxe6 i..f6 24.exf7 .bf7 .25.0f3! . bh4 26.tLlxh4 tLlf6 27,tLlg6+ h g6 2S...bg6 we7 29.'*'f5 'it.'dS 30.r:tael ~c5+ 31.'it.'h1
Caro - Kann - Exchange Variation and Panov -Botv innik Attack
:l:tfS 32.'We51 :etc7 [32 ... 1iV~7 ;33,'iYxdS+!] 33.b4! "ilYc6 34.c4 dxc4 35.~f5 raf7 36.l:td1+ rlfd7 37..bd7 rlxd7 38.'iYb8+rJi;e7 39.l:[de1+ . [39 ... >#;£7 40.'iVe8X] 1-0
0-0 8 ..te2l2'la6 9.A f3 'iWbS 10.l2'lge2 'it'xb3 11.axb3 l2'lb4 , 12.0-0 n d8 13..t[a5 hS 14.h4 l2'ld3 1S.:td1 l2'lxc1 1SJbc1 bS 17.l:ta4 .tb71S.dS .bf3 19.dxe7 n d7 20.gxf3 :teS 2Urd1 llexe7 22.'1t>f1 hS 23.l:da1 .l2'ld5 ",. Jvanchuk,Vasily 24.l2'lxd5 l:txdS :" 25..i1xa7 J:txa7 26Jlxa7 b d4 27.l2'lc3 11a5 2S.11d7 ;' Ehlvest.Jaan .bc3 29.bxc3 .i1a3 30.'1t>g2 l%xb3 New Delhi/Teheran FIDE-Wch 2000 (2) 31.l:tb7 wg7 32.c4 1:Ib4 33.wg3 WfS 1.c4 cS 2.e4 d5 3.exd5 l2'lf6 4.l2'lc3 ' cxd5 , 5.d4 e6 6luf3 it.b4 7.cxd5 , 34.14 we6 35 ..t[c7 l:b3t 3S.f3 l'lb4 l2'lxd5 S:Wc2 'ilc7 9.~d2 l2'ld7 " 37.ilc6+ Wd7 38.11fS we7 3UtcS - Y2-Y2 ,10•..¥i.d3 .b c3 11.bxc3 l2'l5fS 12.a4 .-. \tieS 40J:tf611xc4 41 ..i1xb6 ,bS 13.0-0 ~b7 . 14.l2'lh40-0 .15.f4 .td5 . 16.l2'lf3 ":tc4 17.l2'le5 .txd3 Kasparov,Garry .. ;. 1S.ifxd3 .t[ac819.l'lf3llld5 20:i1'b5 Anand,Viswanathan (UfdS 21 ..!1af1 , f5 " 22.A e1 l2'lxe5 Amsterdam 1996(3) ' 23.fxeS ''iWc4 24.i.h4 '1Wxb5 25.axbS 1.84 cS 2.d4 dS 3.exdS cxd5 4.c4 tZlfS S.l2'lc3 l2'lcS 6.i1.gS eS 7.l2'lf3 ,Ud7 26.l:tc1 l:tc4 27.~e1 l2'lc7 2S:h3 l:tdxd4 '; ", . 0-1 ~e7 S.c5 h6 9.j.f4 tL)e4 10...tbS l2'lxc3 :11.bxc3 iid7 12.0-0 0-0 :.' Sveshnikov,Evgeny 13.11c1 l:teS 14..1:1e1 iif6 15.l:tb1 b6 16.i.a6 .tc8 17.iibS ~d7 18..b S Malakhov. Vladimir Moscow 2003 (9) , 1t.cS 19..itd3 bxc5 20.l2'le5 ~d7 21 J:tb7 ~xeS 22.dxe5 n bS 23.ILxbS 1.e4 cS 2.d4 dS 3.exdS cxd5 4.c4 'itxbS 24.'ifg4 wfS 25.1:1e3 'ikdS i l2'lf6 5.tDc3 eS 6.l2'lf3 ~b4 7.cxdS 26.h4 'tWaS 27..i:t:g3 We7 .2S.VWxg7 ·l2'lxdS SJi'c2 'lllcS 9.~e2 0-0 10.0-0 wdS 29.'iWxf7 'ill'xc3 30.~bS 'it'a5 ~e7 ; 11 J:td1 ilf6 12.1We4 . l2'lce7 3U'tg7 l2'le732.2.xd7 >t>xd7 33:i¥f6 ;. 13.h4 i.d7 14.~d3 g6 15.hS l:tcS d4 34.j.xh6 c4 35.~ gS 'it'cS .1S.hxgS hxg6 17.iihSl2'lxc3 18.bxc3 3S.ttxe7+ " 1-0 ,j.cS · 19.'iWf4 l2'ld5 20.'iWg4 k g7 : 21.2.xg7 ~xg7 22.l2'leS "effS 23.c4 l2'lf4 24.j.f1 .:thS 25.l2'lxc6 .J:!h4 .' Mamedyarov,Shakhriyar ·26.VJt'g3 l:tchS 27.f3 bxcS 2S.l:Id2 cS Smeets,Jan ' 29.ile1 cxd4 30.tte4e5 31 :<:5 'iJle7 wifk aan 2eeB 2005 (i3) 1.c4 cS 2.e4 dS 3.exdScxd5 4.d4 32JXc2 d3 33Jlcc4 d2 0~1 l2'lfS S.l2'lc3 l2'lcS 6.iigS dxc4 7..b c4 , 'ii'xd4 ' a:ii'xd4 l2'lxd4 9.0-0-0 , e5 i;;. Gelfand,Boris 10.14 ~g4 " 11.l2'lf3 lLlxf3 12.gxf3 Morozevich.Alexander . .txf3 13.fxeS .bh1 14.exf6 h6 Wijk aan Ze~' 2002 ( 11) , 15.1:[e1+ w d71S ..tId1+ weS 17.ilh4 1.c4cS 2.e4d5 3.exd5 cxdS 4.d4 ;. l2'lf6 S.l2'lc3 g6 S:tWb3 . ~g7 7.cxd5 ttcS ,. .1S...te2 . g5 , 19.j.g3 .lke4 \~
157
Chess Op ening Essent ials - Volum e 1 20.~g4
'. '
',"
J:txc3+ 21.bxc3 ~a3+ 22.wd2 h5 23.\it>e3 ~c2 24.ii.d7+ wfS 25.l:td5 ~c1 + 2S.wd4 wgS 27.jLeS h4 2S.~e5 ~gS 29.l%d7 h3 30.~g3 ii.f4 3Utxb 7 .ihg3 32.hxg3 h2 33...icS J:th3 34.jLh1 l:[xg3 35JlbS+, wh7 3S.tIb2 J:th3 37.c4 ~f5 3S.c5 wgS 39.cS .tixfS 40.l:tf2 wgS 41.c7 .tl:hS 42.We5 fS+ 43.'.r;'dS g4 44.WcS w g5 45 ..ttd2 g3 4S.l:tdS · I1h4 47.~c5 · llh7 4S.\t>cS ~f4 49..tl:eS ii.h3 50.J:!e4+ wg5 51.lle2 .ahS 52.~ b7 ~f4 53 ..tl:e4+ M5 54J'Ie2 g2 55.l:tf2+ we5 5S.IIxg2 , ~xg2+ 57..ibg2 Wf4 0-1
Tal,Mikhail Bronstein,David Leningrad ch-URS 19 71 (4)
1.e4 cS 2.c4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.d4 It.JfS 5.tDC3 tt::JcS S.~g5 1ig4 .7.~e2 h e2 S.tt::Jgxe2 dxc4 9.d5 .'. tt::Je5 10.0-0 hS 11 ..if4 tt::JgS' 12.~a4+ 'iiVd7 13.'i'fxc4 J:tc8 14.~b3 e5 15.dxeS ~xeS 1S."ii'xb7 , jLc5
158
17.tt::Jd4 h d4 1S.I1ae1 0·0~19 ..rixe6· fxeS ,, 20.~dS l:tfdS . 21.~c7 .tUS 22.tt::Jb5 ' ~e5 23 .~xe5 tt::Jxe5 24.'iWxa7 tt::Jd5 25.'tWd4 tbgS 2S.h4' tt::Jgf427.'i!Ve4 1-0 "
':~
Fischer,Robert Euwe,Max Leipzig 01 1960 (7) '
.'
1.e4 cS 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.c4 tt::JfS 5.tt::Jc3 tt::JcS S.tt::Jf3 jLg4 7.cxd5 tbxd5 8:iWb3 A xf3 9.gxf3 eS 10.'iVxb7 tt::Jxd4 11.~b5+ lt.Jxb5 12.'iVcS+ \it>e7 13.'i'fxb5 4:lxc3?! 14.bxc3 ~d7 15.l:tb1 lldS 1S..ie3 'irxb5 17.lhb5 J:td7 1S:~e2 fS 19.1:[d1! llxd1 20.~xd1 wd7 21 ..ttbS ~CS 22 ..b a7 g5 23.a4 $.g 7' 24.l:tbS+ 'ittd5 25.n b7 ~fS 2S.l:tbS ~g7 27JIb5+ ~cS 2SJlb6+ wd5 29.a5 f5 30.~ bS .ticS [30 ... ~xc3? 31.a6] 31.aS .rl:xc3 ,32.1lb5+! [32.a7" lla3 33.11d6 .:rWc4 H ..l:txe6 ~d4]
32 ... wc4 33.llb7 $.d434.J:tc7+ wd3 35.l:txc3+ \t>xc3 3S ..ie5! .., 1-0'
Caro-Kann - Main Line
Caro-Kann Main Line 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3 /L C3
favour in the positional variations. The aggressive continuation 5 ...ttJf6 6.e5 ttJe4 7.ttJxe4 dxe4 8.ttJg5 c5 9.£i.c4 also seems to be doubtful for Black. Returning to 3. ttJ c3 (3.ttJd2), and now: 3. d5xe4 4. ttJc3xe4
~.
After 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5, White's most usual choice continues to be defending e4 with the knight, usually with 3. ttJc3. Over the last 20 years the pseudo refinement 3.ttJd2 is a frequent alternative. Given that nine times out of ten Black continues by taking on e4, this move does not make a big difference. Unless, of course, Black intends to play one of the 3 ... g6 systems. In that case ttJd2 proves to be more precise than ttJc3 given that, as in some lines of the Modern Defence, White keeps the option of supporting the centre with c3. However, you need to contemplate the wisdom of discouraging a variation (3 .. .g6) that has a worse performance statistically than other normal variations! Indeed, after 3.ttJc3 g6, the position has the characteristics of many dubious variations of the Pirc-Modern Defence. For White 4.h3!, so as to prevent ... £i.g4, seems best. After 4 ... £i.g7 5.ttJf3 the results tend to be in White's
We have reached the key position of the Classical Variation of the Caro-Kann. Black has three continuations: A) 4 ... ttJf6, which is provocative and controversial. Its reputation oscillates from 'dubious' to 'interesting'; B) 4 ... ttJd7, the popular Smyslov Variation; C) 4 ... £i.f5, the old main line. A) 4 .... ItJgS-f6 Black allows the creation of an ugly doubled pawn, which has the virtue of controlling e5, the usual outpost for White's pieces in the Caro-Kann. 5. ltJe4xf6+ Now Black can recapture with either of the pawns.
A1) 5. e7xf6 This appears to be anti -positional, as it gives White a queenside pawn majority. Yet, it does have the advantage of being solid: the mass of pawns will protect
159
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
the king after subsequent kingside castling and, in addition, Black's two pawn islands are easier to defend than the three pawn islands created by taking with the other pawn. There is a very high percentage of draws with this line and for Black, it is difficult to win. White can continue quietly, aiming for a slightly favourable endgame. Or he can play the more aggressive 6. c2-c3 Defending d4. 6. ~fS-d6 0-0 7. ~f1-d3 S. 'iVd1-c2 l:US-eS+ 9. tUg1-e2 g7-g6 9 ... h6 is safer. 10. h2-h4
with a dangerous attack.
A2)
160
5.
g7xf6
This recapture is enterprising and more popular. It is often called the Bronstein/Larsen Variation, after two of its most illustrious exponents - it is no coincidence that both players are associated with daring and creative chess. Black enjoys better control of the centre, he has his eye on the g-file, and in some variations he succeeds in advancing his e-pawn to es. Black will usually develop the cS-bishop to fs or, less often, to g4; the knight goes to d7 and the queen is moved to c7 or as. However, Black's real problem is not his pawn structure - the active placement of his pieces makes this academic - but the much more urgent dilemma of his king's future. Kingside castling without the g7 -pawn seems unsafe; and after Black castles queenside, White's pawn advance there should be quicker than Black's pawn march on the kingside. White has several different plans. However, the most common, and probably also the strongest, has proved to be the waiting move 6. c2-c3! White delays tUf3, as he does not wish to encourage ... ~g4. He waits for 6. ... ~cS-f5 to harass the bishop with 7. tUe2 tLld7 S.tLlg3 ~g6 9.h4. It is true that after 9 ... hs IO.~e2 ~as, White can win a pawn with 1 1.b4 followed by tUxhs, but Black's counterplay, based on the ... e7 -es advance or, alternatively, ... a7 -as, has revealed itself to be insidious. As a result, the plan of preparing for the kings ide fianchetto 7. tUg1-f3 e7-e6 S. g2-g3! has recently caught on.
Caro-Kann - Main line
By doing this White aims to consolidate his king after castling, and in the case of opposite-side castling the g2-bishop becomes a dangerous weapon. If instead Black castles kingside, White's advantage is small but concrete, as his excellent percentage of more than 60% would appear to confirm. B) tLib8-d7 4 .... This has recently been called the Smyslov Variation, while in some of the older manuals it is referred to as the Nimzowitsch Variation.
Besides Smyslov, anotller famous and devoted practitioner was, and still is, Anatoly Karpov. For many, his continued support is the reason why this variation enjoys its current popularity. Black does not directly attack the knight on e4, but it 'threatens to threaten' on
the next move with .. .tLlgf6: perfectly in keeping with Nimzowitsch's style of play. Now White has to decide what to do with his knight on e4 in the next two moves. Practice has shown that neither to defend it, nor to exchange it with the one on f6, nor to m ove it to g3, gives White any serious opportunities to gain an advantage. Strangely, the best square has proven to be g5 1, and the knight can be moved there either immediately or after the preliminary 5.ii.c4. Black cannot try to rid himself of the knight's ominous presence here right away because of various tactical resources centred around e6 or f7. First he must continue to develop, and after the knight - depending on the variation - returns from g5 to f3 or to e4, White maintains an unpleasant initiative. However, the system is a hard nut to crack and it is well suited to black players who are not worried about the prospect of defending cramped but solid positions. B1) 5. ~f1-c4 The most natural continuation, and it was the most popular move until the 1980s. tLig8-f6 5. 6. tLie4-g5! e7-e6 6 .. .tLld5 is playable, but it has never been popular. 7. "iYd1-e2! tLid7-b6! Black first defends the e6-pawn. Instead, the move 7 ... ~d6?? (or 7 .. .h6??) would be followed by the brutal 8. tLlxf7! r3; xf7 9.'i!he6+ W g6 10.jg,d3+ r3;h5 11.'i!I'h3
161
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Mate! After 7 ... tLlb6 White's bishop usually retreats to d3, having played out its role on the a2-g8 diagonal; namely, to force Black to block the way out of the c8 -bishop with ... e6. However, 8 .~b3 also has its admirers and it is not necessarily inferior. h7-h6 8 . .tc4-d3 It is inadvisable to take the d4-pawn: indeed, at first glance B..."Wixd4?! 9.tLl1f3
"fII dS! 10. tLleS WI xg2 11.:1f1 iie7
seems very dubious. However, things are not as terrible as was thought before the advent of chess computer programs. For example, after 12.tLle5/tLlg5xf7 0-0, it is even possible that Black is better; but after 12.~ef3!, it is probable that White is in fact the one with the advantage: 12 .. :~g4 13.tLlxf7! and now after 13 ... 0-0?, we have 14.tLlh6+!.
162
Computer programs are capable of finding hitherto unthought-of tactical resources in what appear to be desperately bad positions. As a result, many variations that had been uncritically accepted for decades have had to be subsequently re-evaluated. Back to 8 .. .h6 . 9. tLlg5-f3 Now the d4-pawn was really undefended. Here Black's c8-bishop looks ugly However, the g I-knight is hardly happy to find his fellow knight sitting onn. c6-c5 9 . ... Black attempts to free his game. With time, the main line has become 10.d4xc5 ~f8xc5 The move 10 ... tLlbd7 is playable, but this usually does not appeal to a Caro-Kann player's taste, given that after l1.b4 adequate compensation for the pawn is yet to be proved. 11. tLlf3-e5 Vacating n for the other knight. 11. ... tLlb6-d7 12. tLlg1-f3 "iVd8-c7
13.0-0 Keep in mind the following tactics: 13.it,d2? tLlxeS14.tLlxeS bj2+!! lS.<J;>xj2 'iYxeSand after 16.Wl xeS Black regains the queen with
Caro-Kunn - Main Line an advantage ong4.
all
account of the knight fork
0-0 13. '" 14. ~c1-f4 ~ cS-d6 and White will have difficulty maintaining the outpost on eS. After IS JHel tLlcs 16.J:Iadl b6, Black concludes his development and the game is balanced. B2)
S. ti:le4-gS
A paradoxical move that creates no immediate threat. S. ... ti:lga-f6 Or 5 ... h6?! 6. tLle6! 'fIHa5+ (the knight is immune from capture because of mate in two) 7.~d2 filb6 8. ~d3 tLlgf6 (once again taking the knight on e6 doesn 't work, this time becalise of 9. fiih5+ followed by 1O. ~5 and Black loses the queen) 9.tLlxf8 tLlxf8 with a big, even though not decisive advantage for White.
6. ~f1-d3 With 6 . ~c4 we would be back in Variation Bl. e7-e6 6 .... 7. ti:lg1-f3 ~fa-d61 7 ... h6?! is premature b ecause of 8.tLlxe6! fxe6 9. il.g6+ cJ;;e7 10.0-0 and only a computer would know how to defend this position with Black. In prac-
tice White's attack proves to be winning. a. iVd1-e2! To take on e4 with the queen. a. ... h7-h6 Finally Black can force the troublesome knight to go elsewhere. 9. ti:lgS-e4 With the fS-square free for the black king, the sacriflCe on e6 does n ot lead to anything good. ti:lf6xe4 9. ... 10. ~e2xe4
Black's problem is the c8-bishop, which is usually developed to b7. To make this p ossible, Black must defend c6 or force the white queen to leave e4. After 10 .. .'Wc7 11.fiIg4! the black king's position is problematic, in that he must continue with 11 ... cJ;;fS!, with a small plus for White. For this reason, Black usually prefers the alternative 10.... ti:ld7-f6 In the past the natural 11.lWh4 was played, putting the kingside under pressure and rendering kingside castling too risky for Black. However, in 1993 Karpov stunned the chess world with the sensational n ovelty 11... ..te7!!. 163
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
ier for White to open the g-file after short castling - after which the game turns into a slow positional struggle, typical of many variations of the CaroKann. White has slightly more possibilities thanks to his space advantage, but Black's position is solid and without weaknesses.
An incredible move which, by defending the rook on h8, puts the white queen in peril with the simple threat of 12 ... g5 13.'iYh3 g4.1n order to give the queen some space there remains only 12.tt:le5, which, however, loses a pawn after 12 ...~xe5 13.dxe5 ~a5+. Enthusiasm for Karpov's idea waned a little when it was discovered that after 14.c3 'iYxe5+ 15.~e3, White has greater compensation than was originally thought and probably enough to continue, with an unclear game. Obviously, however, most white players are looking for an objective advantage, and thus prefer the more solid 11. ~e4-e2 b7-b6 ~c8-b7 12. ~c1-d2 13.0-0-0 'iYd8-c7
Now Black will be wise to castle queenside - the h6-pawn makes it eas164
Classical Variation C) ~c8-f5 4 .... This is the old main line. It suffered a slump in popularity at the end of the 20th century because of the success of the Smyslov Variation. However, in the £lrst years of the new millennium it has become more and more fashionable again. In the age of the computer and the Internet, in which new moves are available within seconds of being made, the following phenomenon turns up: during an important game a strong player employs a new variation, or dusts off a forgotten one; the game is subsequently discussed and analysed around the world; other new moves are proposed and discovered; lower-rated players imitate the stronger players by using the variation in question; and in no time at all there is such a big database of games available that it is very diffl.cult to surprise your opponent that is, until another creative player uses something else that's new and offwe go again. An example of this is a move that we will look at soon: 7 .. .tLlf6 . This move was even classified as a blunder in the old opening manuals. It would appear that as a result of these developments there will soon be nothing left to discover in opening theory: a
Caro-Kann - Main Line
convIctlOn that Capablanca already ventilated in the 1930s (!!). However, fortunately for us, history has demonstrated that this is far from being the case, and that there still exist large areas that have yet to be explored, and much from the past that need to be reassessed in the light of what we know now. Even if one day we do manage to sift through everything there is to be known about chess, human memory is such that the old saying 'Everything new is something forgotten' will prove itself to be as true as ever. Returning to where we left off, White almost always proceeds with 5. tUe4-g3 By the way, even if 5.ctJc5 is playable and better than it would appear to be: as is so often the case with David Bronstein's ideas! 5 .... ~f5-g6 Now we have reached one of the most important positions of the Caro-Kann.
White can choose from many plans, whereas Black's scope for development is restricted. Usually White continues with 6.h4, but once in a while he also has plans that include ctJe2-f4 - with or without ~c4. The advantage of the two
bishops after the possible exchange of the f4-knight for the g6-bishop is only academic. This is because in the closed positions that are typical of these variations it is not rare that a knight is more effective than a bishop. The sacrifice of a knight or bishop on e6 in these variations is interesting but not really sound. On the other hand, the idea of advancing the f-pawn is a double-edged sword, because if the subsequent advance to f5 becomes impossible, the pawn on f4 will become a pronounced positional weakness; for starters, just have a look at the poor bishop on c 1. White normally seeks to profit from the position of the g6-bishop to gain space on the kingside with 6. h2-h4 It is true that sometimes pawns that advance too far up the board can become weak, but in this specific case, experience has demonstrated that this is the only option that allows White to hope for a concrete advantage. 6. ... h7-h6 7. tUg1-f3 White threatens 8.ctJe5 before advancing the h-pawn again. Here we corne to another point relevant to our previous discussions about the development of opening theory. For decades in this position Black automatically played 7. ... tUb8-d7 to prevent the very move ctJe5. Recently, it has become fashionable to ignore this threat, and play 7 ... ctJf6!? After 8.ctJe5 i..h7, the most solid move is 9.Sit.d3! (the old opening books believed the following line to be excellent for White: 9 .i..c4 e6 10.Wk'e2, with the idea of 11. ctJxf7. But in reality after 165
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I IO ... tLldS, White does not gain anything - indeed, the results favour Black) 9 ... ~xd3 (9... 'fHxd4? lO.tLlxf7!) I O.'i1Vxd3 e6.
White seems to have gained a tempo compared to variations of the old main line: the pawn on the h4-square has no influence on the game compared to hS, but the knight's placement on eS rather than f3 seems to be an advantage. However, the latter may in fact not be the case. In certain variations of the Petroff Defence also, the black knight is better on f6 than on e4, where it facilitates White's development). The resulting positions are typical of the Caro-Kann: solid but cramped, and are variously described as equal or slightly to White's advantage, depending on the taste of the commentator. Let's return to 7 .. .tLld7. B. h4-h5 As the pawn has already been played to h4, you may as well advance it one more square before exchanging the bishops.
B. ...
~g6-h7
9. ~f1-d3 i.h7xd3 10. tfd1xd3 Now, to stop ~ f4, Black usually proceedswith
166
10. ... 11. ~cl-d2 12.0-0-0
'lifdB-c7 e7-e6 ILlgB-f6
We have reached another key position of the Caro-Kann (a so-called tabiya, an Arabic term for 'key position' which is derived from the medieval predecessor of the game). Experience gained from thousands of games demonstrates that the best move for White is either of the following two: 13 .~e2 or 13 .tLle4. C1) 13. 'iWd3-e2 Spassky's aggreSSive idea: the queen defends eS, enabling tLleS, to attack f7. 13.... 0-0-0 The recent idea 13 ... cS!? is intriguing, as it undermines the control of eS before White can occupy it. 14. ILlf3-e5 And here Black generally plays 14. ... ILld7-b6 to defend f7 indirectly, given that 14 .. .lLlxeS has not produced encouraging results. Indeed, a white pawn on eS limits Black's mobility, also in a possible endgame, and the g3 -knight can immediately become very active on e4. Back to 14 ... tLlb6. White now mostly continues with
Caro-Kann - Main Line 15. ~d2-a5
This defends d4 and threatens the annoying c4-cS. Black responds energetically. 15 ....
J:!:d8-d5!
from the fact that there are as many exceptions as there are rules: in this specific case the knight on g3 is White's most passive piece and it seems to be a good idea to exchange it for the knight on f6, which is playing an important defensive role. In addition, the move makes g2 -g3 possible, with control of f4 . At this stage, Black almost always plays 13. ...
0-0-0
against which the best response is 14. g2-g3!
Liberating himself from the pin with every means available. Now White can play the solid 16. ~a5xb6
contenting himself with a slight positional advantage. 16._
a7xb6
The defence ofD must be maintained. 17. c2-c4 Followed by 18.4Je4, and if needs be f4. Alternatively, White can accept the challenge and defend the as-bishop with 16.b4. Black must then continue energetically with 16 .. .IhaS! 17.bxaS ~a3+ 18.~bl 4Ja4, but it is not clear if Black has achieved sufficient compensation for the exchange. C2)
13.4Jg3-e4
is the most frequent and probably best move. This is despite the fact that it seems to contravene the principle that in a cramped position, every exchange favours the defender. However, as you know, the complexity of chess arises
Preparing for Is .~f4. Black now usually simplifies with 14. ...
4Jf6xe4
14 ... 4JcS!? is playable, even if IS .4JxcS ~xcS 16.c4!, with the idea of .i1Lc3, seems to give White a small plus. 15. ~d3xe4 ~f8-d6 . IS ... 4Jf6?! attacks the queen but gives up control of the eS - and cS -squares. 16. c2-c4!
c6-c5
And after 17 .~c3 or 17 .dS!? the results appear to be slightly in White's favour, with a decidedly high draw rate of aroundSO%. This type of variation is typical of the Caro-Kann: suitable for patient players who have no problem with the prospect of a probable draw. 167
Chess Opening Ess entials - Volume I
Reti.Richard Tartakower,Savielly Vienna 1910
,1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 dxe4 4.tbxe4 tbf6 5.'iWd3 e51! 6.dxe5 ~a5+ 7.£ d2 'ii'xe5 S.O-O-O tbxe411 [Black was 'worse anyway: this game aptly il- , lustrates the dangers of having your king in the' centre when there are open lines and the development is lagging; 8".'if(xe4 9.l:!.el+-; 8 .. ,tbbd7 9,tbf3±; 8... ~e7 ' 9.tbxf6+ 'iWxf6 IO.tbf3±] 9:ii'dS+! It.txdS 10.~g5+
Karpov,Anatoly;. " Miles,Anthony
"
Bath 1983 ' 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.tbd2 dxe4 4.tbxe4 ,< tbf6 5.tbxf6+, gxf6 6.tbf3 ~f5 7.~f4 tbd7 S.c3 'fIb6 9.b4 e5 10.i£.g3 0-0-0 11.Ae2 h5 12.0-0 .!te4 13.tbd2 ll.d5 14.i..xh5 exd4 15.c4 .ie6 , 16.a3 "tbe5 17.Ue1 d3 1S.c5 'ii'b5 19.1:!.b1 j,h6 20.a4 Vi'a6 21.f4 tbc4 22.b5 cxb5 23.l:!.xb5 ,lLla3 24.J:l.b2 tbc2 25.~f3 i.d5 26.l:!.e7 .li..fS 27.i.xd5 l:!.xd5 28.J:bxb7 he7 29.l:txe7 , 'ilic6 30.1Xxf7 llxc5 31.'ii ·g4+ f5 32Ji'g7 l::te8 33.h4 tbe3 34.~f2 J:[c1+ 35.>t;>h2 tbg4+ 36.cbg3 , tbxf2 , 37.tbf3 tbe4+ 3S.
Tal,Mikhail ; Benko,Paul Amsterdam izt 1964 (11)
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 dxe4 4.tbxe4 tbd7 5.i.c4 [5.'ii'e2?! (a clever trap) , 5".tbgf6?? (5 ,..tbdf6! and the queen on e2 , hinders White's ' development) 6.tbd6X] 5 ..•tbgf6 6.tbg5 e6 7.'fke2 " 168
tbb6 S...tb3 h6 9.tb5f3 i.e7 10.tbh3 c5 11.~e3 tbbd5 12.0-0-0 tbxe3 13.fxe3 'fiIc7 14.tbe5 a6 15.g4 i.d6 16.g5 hxg5 17.lbxg5 ~xe5 1S.dxe5 'fWxe5 19.1:tdS+
Anand,Viswanathan " Bologan,Viktor Dorunund 2003 (7)
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 dxe4 4.tbxe4 tbd7 5.tbg5 tbgf6 6.i.d3 e6 7.tb 1f3 i.d6 SJWe2 ' h6 9.tbe4 tbxe4 10.'ii'xe4 Wtc711.0-0 b6 12.'iWg4 g5 13.'iWh3 l:!.gS 14.l:!.e1 II i.fS 15.Vi'f5 i.g7 16.h4 WfS 17.'ifh3 n hS ' 1S.hxg5 hxg5 19.'iWg4 c5 20.i.xg5 cxd4 21.1:[ad1 i.b7 22J be6 fxe6 23.i.e7+ . tJ;xe7 24.~xg7+ dS 35:iHf7 l:te8 36.~d3 1-0
Kramnik,Vladimir Bareev,Evgeny Wijk aan Zee 2003 (3) 1.e4 ' c6 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 dxe4 4.tbxe4 i.f5 5.tbg3 il.g6 6.h4 h6 7.tbf3 tDCJ7 S.h5 ~h7 9.i.d3 .b d3 10.1lVxd3 tbgf6 11.i.f4 e6 12.0-0-0 i.e7 13.tbe4 tbxe4 14:efxe4 tbf6 15.'iWd3 ~d5 16.c4 'iWe4 17.'i¥xe4 tbxe4 18.i.e3 tbd6 19.b3 i.f6 20.g4 b5 21.tbd2 'iitd7 22.c8 34J:rtd3' r!a7 35Jld8+ 1:i.xd8 36.n xd8+ c3
Caro-Kann - Main Line ~,'
3S.~d3
rJ..c7 39.~e4 ~b7 40.l:td1 ~cS .4Ui dS+ ~b7 42.~f4 trcs 43.J:Id7+ llc7 44.J:(d3 ~cS 45.l:!.dS+ wb7 4S.i.fS gS 47.hxgS fxgS 4S.~g~ 1-0
Kramnik, Vladimir " Leko,Peter Brissago Wch ill 2004 (12)
1.e4 (;6 2.d4 d5 3.tt:ld2 dxe4 4.tt:lxe4 ...tf5 5.lbg3 ..tg6 6.h4 h6 Vbf3 tt:ld7 S.h5 .th7 9.i.d3 it..xd3 10:ii'xd3 eS 11 ..tf4 'iYa5+ 12..td2 Wic713.0-0-0 'tt:lgf6 14.tt:le4 O~O-O 15.g3 tt:lxe4 . 16.Wixe4 i.dS 17.<,tb1 l:1heS 1S.'li'h7 :l:gS 19.c4 c5 20.d5 tt:lfS 21,'ilt'c2 exd5 . 22.cxd5 'ilVd7 23.i.c3 r.tdeS 24.bf6 gxfS 25.'i1Vd3 f5 2S.tt:ld2 b5 27.l:!.he1 <,tbS 2S.'t'ic3 llxe1 29Jbe1 ··· c4 30.tt:lf3 f4 31.g4 ..tc7 32:ifd4 •Wixg4 33.'ilie4 'i!Vxh5 34.tt:ld4 'iVgS 1/2-1/2
.
Topalov,Veselin Vallejo Poru,Francisco Leon rapid 2006 (!)
.
1.e4 cS 2.d4 d5 3.tt:ld2 dxe4 4.tt:lxe4 ~f5 5.tt:lg3 .tgS S.h4 h6 7.tt:lf3 ttid7 S.h5 ~h7 9.A d3 jLxd3 10.'ilVxd3 eS 11.i.f4 .tb4+ 12.c3 iLe7 13.tt:le4 tt:lgfS14.tt:lxf6+ tt:lxf6 15.tt:le5 'it'a5 16:t'kg3 .agS 17.Wih3 Wa6 1S:tIt'f3 lIdS 19.b4 tt:ld7 20.tt:ld3 'it'c4 21.<,td2 'ifd5 22.'~e2 tt:lf6 23.'it'xd5 cxd5 24.13 A d6 -25.a4 rj;e7 26.i.d2 b6 27.g4 a5 2SJlhb1 rJ..d7 29.bxa5 bxa5 30.nb5 1%aS 31.lbc1 'uda7 32Jlab1 tt:leS 33.tt:ld3 '1Pd7 34•..te3 rj;cS 35.111 b3 UbS 3S.UxbS+ i.xbS 37,tb e5 ~xe5 3S.dxe5 l%b7 39.l1xb7 rj;xb7 40.iLc5 fS 41.14 rj;c6 42.i.fS fxe5 43.fxe5 '1Pd7 44.~d3 <,tc7 45.'Ot>e3 'Ot>cS 46.~f4 Wd7 47.g5 -'Ot>dS 4s.bg7 hxg5+ 49.~xg5 tt:lxg7 50.hS ~e7 51.h71-0
169
Chess Opening Essen tials - Volume 1
French Defence 1.e2-c4 c7-c6
has never played anything else in his whole life. Others maintain that it is virtually losing from the start. White players also seem to be polarised by it: there are some that love to play against it, and others who feel so uncomfortable with it that it is not a rarity to see them switch to l.d4, so as to be forever free of the French! As is the case with the Caro-Kann, Black attacks the undefended e4-pawn on the second move, with the difference that the d5 advance is supported by the e-pawn instead of the c-pawn. This has the advantage that when White advances the pawn to e5
This defence had its successful debut in a 1834 London/Paris correspondence team match (hence the name) and in the following years it was to become the 2nd most popular defence after the reigning 1... e5. More than anything, 1.. .e6 is a radical way of avoiding all those £7 -square based tactics that give Black headaches in the Open Games. It was only with the boom in the Sicilian's popularity, which started in the middle of the 20th century, that the French became the third most popular choice against l.e4. Many champions have employed the French as one of the main weapons in their repertoire: Botvinnik is an illustrious exponent from the past, while Bareev, Yusupov, Dolmatov and Kortchnoi are noteworthy contemporary users. For many, the French is a defence to either love or hate: in some it inspires an enthusiasm that borders on the fanatical - again, just think of Uhlmann, who 170
- as often happens - Black is ready to undermine the pawn chain d4-e5 with the ... c7 -c5 advance in one go, or, more rarely, with the advance ... £7 -f6. The price to be paid for this is the passive bishop on c8, which in the Caro-Kann develops without problems. Conceptually speaking, the French is an active defence - contrary to what you would imagine, the percentage of draws in the French is lower than in the Open Games - even if many quiet lines can ensue. The Exchange Variation is a good example. Generally Black concedes
French Defence
space on the kingside in exchange for counterplay against White's centre and good prospects on the queenside. We could simplify things by saying that if Black gets through the middle game alive, his possession of the come and the weakness of the white d4-pawn give him excellent endgame prospects. This is a very general assessment. Clearly there are some specific variations that have different characteristics. Just think of the Tarrasch Variation with 3 ... c5. Here Black's isolated d5-pawn favours White's endgame chances and Black must play all his cards in the middlegame! Now we will have look at the specifics of the variations. After 1.e4 e6, nine times out of ten White responds with 2.d4. However, various other replies are possible: 2. lLlg1-f3 d7-d5 3. e4-e5 c7-c5 4. b2-b4!?
An interesting continuation along the lines of the Wing Gambit against the Sicilian. Here Black has already advanced his pawn to e6, and therefore this represents a better version. However, after 4 ... cxb4 5.a3 4:Jc6 6.axb4 il.xb4 7.c3
il.e7, the compensation is rather dubious, although, at lower levels, where players are usually less skilled in defence than in attack, it can be a highly dangerous weapon. The move 2.d3 introduces the King's Indian Attack, as we have mentioned earlier in the section on the Caro-Kann. The King's Indian Attack is a King's Indian Defence played with the white pieces. Given that the best plan for White in the King's Indian is to advance his e-pawn to e4, here White profits from the fact that Black has already advanced his e-pawn to e6 to establish the same position with an extra tempo. 2. d2-d3 d7-d5 3. lLlb1-d2 c7-c5 4. lLlg1-f3
The pOSItIOn is strategically complex, and offers both players possibilities. Play is very similar to the Sicilian: 1.e4 c5 2.4:Jf3 e6 3.d3 with the usual continuation 3 ... d5 4.4:Jbd2, which we will look at in more detail later. 2.~e2 is possible and runs along the lines of the preceding variation, but prevents the immediate 2 ... d5 if Black wants to recapture with the pawn. Black
171
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I .,
prepares to play ... dS with 2 ... fie7, or otherwise he plays 2 ... cS and the game assumes the distinctive features of the King's Indian Attack. Alternatively, Black's could reply with the paradoxical 2 ... eS!?
Cosulich,Roberto Pokojowczyk,Jerzy Nice 011974 (2) '
,.
· 1.~4 e6 2.d3 dS 3.tLld2 tLlf6 4.tLlgf3 b6 S.g3 ~b7 6.eS ltJfd7 7.i..g2 tLlc6 ' S.llYe2 tbb4 9.tbb3 cS 10.0-0 ~e7 ,11.M VJlic7 12.l'J.el as 13.a3 ltJc6 . 14.~f4 bS lS.ltJbd2 0-0 16.ltJfl l'J.fc8 17.c3 b4 lS',ltJe3 ltJf8 19.1tJg4 ~a6 20.tLlf6+ gxf6 21.exf6 'iWdS 22.fxe7 llYxe7 23.c4 Wf6 24.ltJeS ltJd4 2S.VJlidl ~b7 26.ltJg4 llYe7 27.Ag5 < · ~d6 2S.~f6 tLld7 29.ltJh6+ 'It'fS ' 30.\lVhS 1-0
Fischer,Robert Miagmarsuren,Lhamsuren considering that in the Open Games you are worse off with your queen on e 2 than on d I. For example, White now has a problem if he wants to play the RuyLopez! However, as already mentioned, the most popular move is 2.d4 and after 2 ... dS
we arrive at the initial position of the French Defence. The e4-pawn is being attacked and White must decide what to do: advance it, exchange it or defend it. 172
Sousse izt 1967 (3) , ',' ,1.e4 e6 2.d3 d5 3.tLld2ltJf6 4.g3 cS [4... dxe4!? 5.dxe4 e5 " 6.tLlgf3 i.~S] i 5 ..li£.g2 ltJc6 6.ltJgf3 ~e7 7.0-0 0-0 S.eSltJd79.'uel bSl0.tbflb4 11.h4 as ' 12.il.f4 a4 13.a3! (this idea of Fischer is still considered the best] 13... bxa3 [13 ... ..ta6 14.ltJ1h2 c4 IS.d4 c3 16.bxc3 bxc3 17.tLlgsltJb6 18 .~hS ·j(.xg5 19 .~xg5 1!Ye8 20,.M6 ltJxd4 21.tLlg4 tLlfS 22.'iWgS wh8 23.Axg7+ tLlxg7 H.ltJf6 'iWd8 2S.VJlih6 'Kaidanov- · Nijboer, Elista 01 1998 (1 -0, .31)] 14.bxa3 ltJa5 15.ltJe3 ~a6 16•.th3 [16.h5!? with the idea ofh6 and ltJg4) . 16 ...d4 17.tLlfl ttJb6 1S.ltJgS tLldS 19.i.d2 :Ji.xg5 20•.txgS 'Wd7 21.'tWhS : ·l:tfcS 22.ttJd2 ttJc3 23.~f6 1YeS 24.tLle4 g6 2S.VJlig5 tLlxe4 26Jbe4 ; c4 " 27.hS cxd3 2SJi:h4 l'J.a7 ,[28 ... dxc2 29.h~g6 fxg630.:ctxh7+-) 29.~g2 dxc2 [29 .. .'iWf8 30.il.e4 dxc2 . 31.hxg6 fxg6 3 2.~xg6+-] 30.'iWh6 . ~fS 31.Wxh7+ [3L:Wxh7 32.hxg6+ <;t>xg633.il.e4X] " 1-0 ,
French Defence - Exchange Variation
French Defence Exchange Variation 1.e4 efi 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5
way This is why the percentage of draws is also much lower than you would expect. White usually continues with 4. iLd3, reserving the e2-square for his king's knight. Draws are common with 4 .. .iLd6 S.ttJe2 ttJe7 6.0-0 0-0 7.iLf4 ~fS.
The Exchange Variation is correctly considered to be unambitious and toothless. After 3 .. .exdS, the resulting position is similar to the Petroff Defence. However, in the Petroff the placement of the black knight on e4 with the accompanying weakening of dS gives White some chances. In the present case, Black achieves complete and immediate equality. However, equality does not mean a drawn game. In fact, Black has a better win rate than White in this variation! The explanation for this lies in competitive psychology: sometimes, when facing a stronger opponent, a white player will choose this system, which is famous for it drawish nature, to score a precious half-point. Only later does he realize that thirty pieces still remain on the board and that their presence generally gives more than sufficient opportunity for the stronger player to win any-
Another development is 4. tLlg1-f3 tLlgS-f6 5. iLf1-d3 Curiously, S.ttJeS?! produces a position from the Petroff Defence, but with reversed colours! 5 .... .tfS-dS An ambitious black player could break the symmetry with S.. .cS!?, which gives his pieces activity at the cost of a weak pawn on dS. S. 0-0 0-0 7. ~c1-g5 ~cS-g4 S. tLlb1-d2 tLlbS-d7 9. c2-c3 c7-cS
'if
.i
ii .'
,: ~
i.*. i
'f::,
i3, i3"f::,
l:t
•• •
iii ~
.t
~"
ttJ
tb 'if
1:Iw
l::,i3,f::,
with a symmetrical position. White's extra tempo does not give him any advantage in such a quiet position. After several exchanges of the major pieces on the e-file the game should head for a draw.
173
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
City London . City Paris cr 1834
.""";
25.b6 d4 26.b7 d3 27.l:aS WfS 2S.c6 d2 29.l%xeS+ 'it>xeS 30.';i;'e2 'it>dS 0-1 j
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.tbf3 tLlf6 5.~d3 c5 6:tWe2+ ~e7 7.dxc5 Tatai,Stefano Kortchnoi,Viktor 0-0 S.ite3 l:[eS 9.~b5 tZlc6 10.tLld4 ,A xc5 11 •.txc6 bxc6 12.c3 .bd4 Beer-Sheva 1978 (6) ,13.cxd4 ' C5 ' 14:~Vd3 'iWb6 15.0-0 " 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 4.~d3 'il,a6 16.'ii'b3 ~xb3 17.axb3 £ xf1 c5 5'.tb f3 tZlc6 S:iVe2+ fi.e7 7.dxc5 1S.Wxf1 tLlg4 19.dxc5 tZlxe3+ tLlf6 S.h3 0-0 9.0-0 i.xc5 10.c3 ,UeS 20.fxe3 .l:txe3 21.tbd2 J:taeS 22.b4 1Ult'c2 '*'d6 12.tZlbd2 'ii'g3 13•..Itf5 .l:td3 23 ..l:txa7 , l:!xd2 24.b5 llxb2 .tte2 14.tZld4 tLlxd4 0-1
174
French Defence - Advance Variation
French Defence Advance Variation 1.04 c6 2.d4 d5 3.c5
,f
I", "
This is sometime s called the Nimzowitsch Variation - as if there weren't already enough variations with that man's name - and it represents one of White's most ambitious options. White gains space on the kingside and he is not afraid to concede Black the initiative. Black will apply pressure to the d4-pawn for several moves, and White will be forced to defend it. This is the heart of the matter. Will this attack bring some concrete advantage, or will it come to nothing and will White then be able to exploit his structural advantage? This subject has been a topic of debate since the time when Nimzowitsch disputed Dr. Siegbert Tarrasch's claims (i.e. that 3.e5 is strategically wrong) in the pages of his famous book My System. Nowadays, we do not have to rely on the inevitably subjective opinions of commentators on any given variation. Modern players have a resource that was
unavailable in the greater part of the last century: statistics. With all its defects, statistical analysis can be very revealing and supply a lot of useful information. If, as in this case, statistics are available for thousands and thousands of games, and White's performance is within the standard result range (let's say 52 -55%), then the results are normal and harsh judgements are unwarranted, Perhaps the truth lies somewhere between the two conflicting viewpoints: 3.e5 does not give White the net advantage that Nimzowitsch claimed, nor does it give Black as easy a game as Tarrasch would have us believe. Black almost always responds with the natural 3. c7-c5 But sometimes he will vary with 3 ... b6 or 3 .. .lLle7, which are both playable moves that leave Black with a cramped position. At this point, White keeps the pawn chain intact by playing 4. c2-c3 The move 4.~ g4 seems too optimistic; while 4 .lLlf3 is interesting, as it is based on the idea of leaving the d4-pawn to its fate : 4 ... cxd4 5 ,~d3 lLlc6 6.0-0 and if Black does not wish to be overwhelmed by White's kingside initiative, he must react energetically there with ... lLlge7 -g6 or ... f? -f6. 4. ... tLlbS-c6 There are some who prefer 4 ... ~b6 5 .lLlf3 ~d 7, to exchange the bad bishop, However, with 6.~e2 ~b5 7,c4! White can open up the game to his advantage. 5. tLlg1-f3 \'WdS-b6 175
Chess Opening Essentiols - Volume
Giving up another pawn to increase his initiative. I O.'i!rYe2 4Je7! 11. 4Jc3 a6! is a simple transposition. 10....
a7-a6!
IO .. .'t lVxe5 is playable but results in an unclear position. After ll..l:(e I, White has the sort of game he has been looking for. 11. ~d1-e2 12. <Jtg1-h1
The most thematic, even though 5 ... ~d7 with the idea of ...4Jge7-f5 is becoming more and more popular. Black increases the pressure on the d4-pawn. Now White has three alternatives. A)
tZlgS-e7
Preparing £1-f4. 12 . ... 13. f2-f4 14. l::tf1-d1
tZle7-c6 ~fS-c5!
tZlc6-b4!
And after ~xa6 or ~xh7, the queen goes to £1 , giving Black the advantage.
6. ilf1-d3
Preparing an interesting but dubious pawn sacrifice. c5xd4 6 ....
7. c3xd4 ~cS-d7 Obviously the double capture on d4 doesn't work because of 9 ..it.bS+, which wins the queen. S. 0-0 To have second thoughts and defend d4 with S . ~e2 does not make sense, as White would transpose to the next variation with loss of a tempo. S. ... tZlc6xd4 9. tZlf3xd4 'tlfb6xd4 10. tZlb1-c3!?
B) 6. ~f1-e2 The most natural move, quietly developing. 6 .... c5xd4! Black wants to relocate his knight to f5, but after 6 ... 4Jge7 a strong response is 7.dxcS, and after 6... 4Jh6 7. ~xh6!, Black cannot take on b2 because of the reply 8. ~e3!, and if 8 .. :~xal 9:~'c2!, and the black queen will be captured. 7.
c3xd4
tZlgS-h6!
The knight goes to f5 via h6 to allow the fS-bishop to maintain control of the a3 square. After 7 .. .4Jge7 S.4Ja3 4Jf5 9.tLlc2 ~b4+ I O.'it>fl!, White castles by hand and will be a little better thanks to his space advantage. S. tZlb1-c3 After 8. 4Ja3, there follows 8...~ xa3; and after 8. ~xh6, without the c3-pawn, the move8 .. :~xb2! is now good . S. ... tZlh6-f5 9. 4Jc3-a4! ~b6-a5+ 10. ~c1-d2 ~fS-b4 11. ~d2-c3! b7-b5
176
French Defence - Advance Variation 12. a2-a3! A b4xc3+ 13. tLla4xc3 b5-b4 'iYa5xb4 14. a3xb4 And it is not clear which is weaker : White's pawns on d4 and b2 or Black's pawn on a7: both sides have approximately equal chances. C) 6. a2-a3 This is the most popular move. Before proceeding with his development, White prevents future checks from b4 or as - a common tactical resource for Black - and prepares for the b2-b4 advance, which gains space on the queenside. However, every move has its negative consequences, and in this case the weakness created on b3 allows the ambitious 6 .... c5-c4!? Black can also permit White to advance the b-pawn with 6 .. .~d7 7.b4 cxd4 8.cxd4 n c8, waiting for 9 .~b2
That would be the case if the white pawn were still on a2: but now, as soon as White wants to open up the queenside he has to recapture on b3 with a piece, and the outpost on c4 will give Black excellent chances. 6 ... c4 is therefore a prophylactic move that intends to completely restrict White's activity on the queenside, after which the strategic centre of gravity will shift to the centre and the kingside. 7. g2-g3!? In anticipation of the .. .f7 -f6 break, White does well to move his bishop to g2 or h3. It is wise for Black to continue with the solid 7. ... ~c8-d7 followed by ... tLlaS and ... 0-0-0, with slow manoeuvring play and chances for both sides.
Bondarevsky,Igor . Botvinnik,Mikhail
in order to respond with 9 ...tLlaS!
10.tLlbd2 tLlc4 with a complicated game. Let's go back to 6 ... c4. This seems like a beginner's move, one of those moves computers used to play in their early days.
L~ningrad/Moscow ch-URS J 94 J (2) 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.tbf3 tbc6 S.ii.d3 cxd4 S.O-O ~cS 7.a3 tbge7 8.tbbd2 tbgS 9.tLlb3 ~ bS 10.ne1 .lri.d7 11.g3 fS 12..b gS+ hxgS 13.'Wd3 Wf7 14.h4 'iYg8 15. ~d2 ~h7 1S..tb4 g5 17.ii'xh7 Mxh7 18.exf6 gxf6 19.hxgS eS 20.gxfS ..t>xfS 21 •.tdS %:.e8 22.tLlh4 n g8 177
Chess Opening Essential s - Volume 1 .....
".,'..
,
.~."
23.'lt>h2 jg"fS 24Jle2 d3 2S •.r:td2 'dxc2 26.14 A e3 27..b eS+ lLlxeS 2S.fxeS+ ~e7 29.J:H1 c1 'ilY 0-1
Sveshnikov,Evgeny Bischoff,Klaus , Calvia 01 2004 (2)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 dS 3.eS cS 4.c3 lLlc6 S.lLlf3 A d7 6.iLe3 cxd4 7.cxd4 lLlge7 S.A d3 h6 9.lLlc3 lLlcS 10.0-0 a6 11.lLld2 lLlb6 12Jlc1 :rcS 13.f4 g6 ,14.g4 lLle7 1S:fk'e2 h5 16.h3 hxg4 17.hxg4 lLlc6 1S.lLlf3 tDb4 19Ji.b1 lLlc4 20. ~g2 iLe7 21.l::th1 l:tg8 22.~f2 lLlc6 23.l:th7 '~bS 24.lLla4 'iiibS 2S.lLlcS b c5 26.dxcS ~xb2 27. ~xb2 .i lLlxb2 28Jkh1 lLle7 29.lLlgS tl:fS 30Jlg7 .tc6 31.iLd4 lLlc4 32.llhh7 ,Wd7 33 ..bg6 lLlxg6 34.I:Ixg6 llcdS 3S.1:[gg7 'weS 3SJbf7 11xf7 37Jbf7 lLla3 3s.lLlf3 lLlc2 39.Wg3 A bS 40..tf2 A e2 4U1g7 iLd3 42.lLld4 ' ". 1-0
10.~f4 fxeS 11.lLlxeS lLlxeS 12..b eS
lLlf6 13.lLld2 0-0 , 14.lLlf3 ~d6 1S:iWe2 :!:acS 16.~d4 Wlc7 17.lLle5 A eS 1S.J:rae1 ~e5 19.A xeS ~c6 20.~d4 A d7 2U!Vc2 tIf7 22.11e31 b6 "" 23.J:!.g3 ~hS 24.~xh71± eSI? [24 ... lLlxh7 2S.'iVg6!+:'::] 2S.~g6 J:{e7 26JIe1 ,'i!fd6 ·27.~e3 . d4 ·' 2S.A g5 , J:[xc3 29J:txc3 dxc3 30.~xc3 Wg8 31.a3 w fS 32.~h4 .teS 33.~fS ~d4 34JWxd4 ,. exd4 3SJbe7 ~xe7' 36.A d3 'It>dS37...b f6 gxf6 38.Wf1 .tcS 39.h4 1-0
Maslak,Konstantin '
~ Asrian,Karen
, Moscow 2 007 (5)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 dS 3.eS c5 4.c3 lLlcs S.lLlf3 fHb6 6.a3 c4 7.g3 iLd7. S.lLlbd2 lLlaS 9.h4 0-0-0 10.hS lLlh6 11.iLh3 fS 12.'i!Ye2 lLlf7 13.0-0 fS 14.lLlh2 g6 1S.14 iLe7 16.94 gS 17.iLg2 gxf4 1S.gxfS exf5 19...b d5 llhgS+ 20.'toh1 .te6 , 21.h eS+' Nimzowitsch,Aaron ~xe6 22.lLldf3 .;lLlb3 23 J~b1 lLlxc1' Salwe,Georg ' . 24.l1bxc1 'it'cS 2S.l:Igl lLlgS 26.11g2 Karlsbad 191 1 lLle4 27.Wg1 'fHdS 2S.lLlf1 llxg2+: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.eS cS 4.c3 lLlc6 . . 29.<;i;>xg2 J:l.gS+ .. 30.w h1 iLh4 S.lLlf3 'it'b6 S..td3 A d7?1 7.dxcS!? 31.w h2 .tf2 32Jtc2 lWf7 33.lLl3d2 A g1+ ~i ~xc5 8.0-0 f6? [~ 8::.aS] 9.b41 A e7
178
French Defence - Tarrasch Variation
French Defence Tarrasch Variation 1.c4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.!i' d2
To defend the e4-pawn with 3 .ttJd2 seems less natural than to do so with 3.ttJc3. However, the former has the virtue of rendering .. .~b4 ineffective. Tarrasch began to play it towards the end of the 19th century, as a means of avoiding the Winawer Variation 3.ttJc3 ~b4, which was beginning to be seen as a valid alternative to the Classical French 3. ttJc3 ttJf6. Another plus of 3.ttJd2 is that in the face of the thematic and omnipresent ... c7 -cS pawn advance in the French, White is ready to support the centre with c3. On the downside we have the knight standing in the way of the bishop on c 1, but more concretely the lack of pressure on the centre (i.e. dS) compared to ttJc3 allows for the immediate .. .c7 -cS advance. Even if it does not solve all of Black's problems, this is one of the most popular moves. The fact that White has no immediate threats m eans that Black has an ample
choice of contillllations. Remember that with 3 ...dxe4 you transpose to the Rubinstein Variation, which we will discuss later. In ascending order of popularity the variations at Black's disposal are: A) 3 .... ~fS-e7 This was occasionally played by Oleg Romanishin during the 1970s and remained a rarity until there was a boom in its popularity at the end of the 20th century; in part thanks to its adoption by big names such as Morozevich and Lputian. The idea, besides getting off the beaten path, is to wait and see what White does, with the chance of making ... cS more effective than on the third move; for example, after 4.il"d3 cS! 5.exd5? (S.dxcS is forced and a good m ove) 5...Wixd5f
Black gets an improved version of the analogous variation after 3... c5, which we wiIllook at furth er on. 4. ttJg1-f3 is the most solid and the most frequent. 4. ... ttJ gS-f6 Now White's best option seems to be 5. e4-e5 5.~3 c5f is good for Black. And after 5. ttJfS-d7 S. .lit.f1-d3 c7-c5 7. c2-c3 ttJ bS-cS 179
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
you magically transpose to the 7.tDgf3 gambit line of the variation with 3 ... tDf6!.
3.
B)
a7-aS
As above. Black wants to play an improved version of 3 ...cS . After 4.eS!? the move 4 ... .l1i.d7 - with the idea of ... .l1i.bS - is interesting. Therefore, if White does not wish to re-enter the 3 ... cS variation with 4.tZlgf3 cS!, the most incisive move would appear to be 4. ~f1-d3 This is connected with the idea of opening up play after 4. c7-c5 5. d4xc5! ~f8xc5 S. tZlg1-f3 White has a freer game; however, Black's position is playable. 180
C) 3 .... tZl b8-cS The controversial Guimard Variation . Developing while attacking a pawn cannot be that bad. However, voluntarily blocking his c-pawn is not natural to a French player and, ignoring its objective value, most people continue to see it as an ugly move. 4. tZJg1-f3! 4.c3 eSt? is not necessarily advantageous for Black, but it makes life more complicated for White. tZJg8-fS 4. 5. e4-e5 tZlfS-d7
We have reached a strange position in which the c6-knight blocks the natural advance of the c-pawn. However, Black is ready to attack the head of the white pawn chain with ...f? -f6. In addition, the d2-knight does not have any particularly inviting squares to go to; so much so, that it usually goes to b3 or fI . Besides 6 ..l1i.bS!? - in the style of the Ruy Lopez - White has two good alternatives: C1) S. tZld2-b3 To set the c I -bishop free. S. ... a7-a5 Not so much with the intention of ... as-a4, but rather with the idea of ... b6 and ... .ia6.
French Defence - Tarrasch Variation 7.
a2-a4
S.
~f1-b5
b7-b6 ttJc6-a7
9. ~b5-d3
even if the flexible 4.tLlgf3, with unforced transpositional possibilities, is becoming popular. Now Black must make the big strategiC decision: should he take back with the queen or with the pawn?
White has the freer game. C2)
6. ~f1-e2 7. e5xf6 8. ttJd2-f1 ! 9. ttJf1-e3 10.0-0
f7-f6 '§'d8xf6 ~f8-d6
0-0
Here, White's position is slightly preferable.
0) c7-c5 3 .... The most thematic response, even if it is less popular than 3 ... tLlf6. Black takes advantage of the timidly placed knight on d2 to fight back in the centre. White generally responds with 4. e4xd5
01) 4 .... 1i'd8xd5 An increasingly large number of players are choosing this move, which leads to sharp positions that are reminiscent of some Sicilian lines. Even if it is not necessarily the best move, the capture by the queen is definitely a nuisance for White, who would normally prefer to proceed more quietly. Generally he reacts with 5. ttJg1-f3! The sacrifice is only temporary: 5. ... c5xd4 6. ~f1-c4 'iWd5-d6! The best square for the queen. 7. 0-0 tLlgS-f6 8. tLld2-b3 tLlb8-c6 9. ttJb3xd4 ttJc6xd4 10. ttJf3xd4 a7-a6 11. l:rf1-e1 'iiVd6-c7 Attacking the bishop on c4 and preparing ... SLd6. 12. ~c4-b3 ~fS-d6 More solid is 12.. . ~d7. 13. tLld4-f5!? ~d6xh2+ 0-0 14. wg1-h1
181
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 15. ttlf5xg7!
This posltlon still has not been fully evaluated, notwithstanding the many games that have been played with it. The following is a representative line that will give you an idea of the possible complications that can ensue: 15....
.l::rf8-d8!
Capturing with 15.. .'Jitxg7 appears to give White the advantage after 16.'iWd4!. 16. ~d1-f3 17. ~c1-h6+1 18. c2-c3!
<;i;>g8xg7 <J;>g7-g6!
Threatening with a devastating check onc2 . 18....
ttlf6-h5!
To play ... fs. 19. ~h6-c1! Threatening 20.~g4+. Now, probably Black's safest option is to return the piece with 19. ... ~h2-f4! 20. g2-g4 21. f2xg3 22. J:l:a1xc1
ttlh5-g3+! ~f4xc1
b7-b6
with equality. 02) 4 .... e6xd5 The most solid. Without fear Black accepts the isolated pawn on ds, putting his faith in his greater piece activity.
182
Tarrasch proposed the same strategic concept in his eponymous defence to the Queen's Gambit (l.M d s 2.c4 e6 3.tLic3 cs! ?) . This move is very popular with strong players; however, it has few adherents at lower levels, where there is an instinctive mistrust of the isolated queen's pawn: that is, if it is black! The point being that when the isolated queen's pawn is white, players seem to be much more aware of its dynamic potential. Just think of the Sicilian with 2.c2-c3, which is popular at all levels, where the isolated d4-pawn is seen more as a means of favourably opening the game (by the d4-dS advance) than a static weakness. 5.
ttlg1-f3
s .~bs+!? iLd7 6.'ilfe2+ ~e7 7.dxcs is
interesting. ttl b8-c6 5 ..., Black prefers to develop the g8-knight to e7 . s ... c4 seems premature, while s...lLlf6 6.iLbs+ iLd7 7.iLxd7+ ttlbxd7 8.0-0 !ii.e7 9.dxcs lLlxcs 10.tLlb3 tLlce4 l1. tLlfM! - with the idea of f3 or 1/Wf3 would appear to be slightly advantageous for White, even if after 11 ...~d7!, Black's position is perfectly playable. 6. ~f1-b5 It is better to postpone taking on cs so that the black bishop moves twice.
French Defence - Tarra sch Variation
S.
~fS-dS
7. d4xc5 S. 0-0
iLdSxc5 lLlgS-e7
9. lLld2-b3
~c5-dS
9 ... £ b6 is also playable. White can then respond with the effective 1O.:rle 1 followed by 11 .£e3, neutralizing the activity of the annoying black bishop. 10. l:tf1-e1 10 .lLlbd4!? is interes ting. 10. ... 0-0 11. ~c1-g5 ~cS-g4 We have arrived at a typical position in this line, for which the percentage of draws is unusually high: around 60%! E) lLlgS·fS 3 .... is the most popular. the most ambitious, and the move which best represents the spirit of the French Defence. 4. e4-e5 lLlfS·d7
A typical 'French' centre has been created, and we are presented yet again with the eternal question: is this a strong or weak centre? There is a basis for a white kingside initiative, but Black's counter play with .. .c7 -c5 and ... f7 -f6 can be very dangerous. At this point White must make an important strategic decision : either support the centre with f2.-f4 or give preference to piece development with ~d3 . 5 .c3!? is a waiting move, but you will transpose to one of the two systems immediately below, depending on White's 6th move. 5.tLlgf3! ? is also playable - it transposes to the gambit that we will deal with in Variation E21 . E1)
5. f2-f4
In a certain sen se this is the m ost logical move: White enlarges his centre and to avoid suffocation Black must react energetically before his opponent fmishes development. To that end, apart from putting pressure on d4, it is often necessary to take radical measures , such as the pawn advances .. .f6 and .. .g5! 5. c7-c5 S. c2-c3 tLl bS-cS 7. lLld2-f3 183
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I Allowing the king's knight to develop to e2 (orh3). 7. ... ~dS-b6 S. g2-g3 Keeping d4 defended: the light-squared bishop seeks a future on h3, and in do ing so leaves the g2-square vacant for the king! 8.li:Je2 is possible, leading to the Steinitz Variation. However, the most popular alternative nowadays is 8.a3!? which, like 6.a3 in the Advance Variation, prevents irritating checks fromb4. c5xd4 S. 9. c3xd4 YLfS-b4+ 10. lite1-f2 And we see the first consequences of White's late development (after 1O.iLd2? Black can calmly take on d4). Now after 10 ...f7-f6 or IO ... .g7-gS, the position is extremely tense with chances for both sides. It is true that White's centre will collapse, but with Black's pawn advances on the kingside it is not clear which of the two exposed kings is more vulnerable. E2)
5. iLf1-d3
White places his pieces more modestly on their natural squares and seeks to limit Black's counterplay, with the idea 184
of profiting from his positional advantages in the long term. In particular the eS-square, if occupied by a trusty knight, could cause Black many problems in the middlegarne as well as in the endgame. 5 .... c7-c5 6. c2-c3 ttJbS-c6 Now White has two options: E21) 7. ttJg1-f3 The increasingly popular choice, which introduces a poisonous pawn sacrifice: 7. ... '(ifdS-b6 After 7 ... YLe7 8.0-0, a recent hot idea is the move 8 ... gS!? (with the point of 9 .!'tel ? g4, winning the knight!). However, this still needs to be accurately assessed. Curiously, this position can also be reached via the variation 3 ... .!te7 (!) S. 0-0 The placement of the white pieces makes it difficult to defend the d4-pawn, so White leaves it to its fate. S. ... c5xd4 9. c3xd4 ttJc6xd4 10. ttJf3xd4 '*li'b6xd4 11. ttJd2-f3 ~d4-b6 12. 'iYd1-a4!
With the idea of going to g4. Black will be wise to prevent this with
French Defence - Tarrasch Variation 12 .... 'iYb6-b4! 'iVb4-c5! 13. ~ a4-c2 If White does not want a draw by repetition, he can try to win with 14. ~c2-e2 With compensation that practical play has demonstrated to be more than adequate. Not that White's position is winning, but in practice these positions are difficult for Black to play; unless he happens to be a computer. E22) 7. ttJg1-e2 Continuing the policy of solidity, keeping the f3-square vacant for the other knight. 7. ... c5xd4 After 7.. f6?1, without the exchange on d4, the move 8.ttJj4! is very strong. S. c3xd4 fN6! At times it is better to attack the head of the pawn chain: in this variation the b6-square is not always the best place for the black queen. 8 ... ttJb6 - with the idea of ... as -a4, ... ~d7 and queenside play - has fallen slightly into disuse. It teeters on the edge of being playable. 9. e5xf6 The aggressive 9.ttJf4, which attacks e6 and threatens 'fi'hS+, is now met by 9 ... ttJxd4 lO .'iVhS+ We7 11.exf6+ ttJxf6 I2 .121g6+ hxg6 I3. ~xh8 ~f7 and practical play has demonstrated that Black receives adequate compensation for the exchange. 9. ... ttJd7xf6 This is more natural than 9 .. .'ttYxf6, even though the latter move has its supporters. 10.0-0 Or first IO.l2lf3. 10.... ~fS-d6 11. ttJd2-f3
We have arrived at one of the key positions of the Tarrasch Variation. Thousands of games have not been sufficient to make clear what Black's best plan is. E221) 11 .... 'ifdS-b6 Putting pressure on d4 and h2. 12. b2-b3 The pawn sacrifice 12..~.f4 is playable, but White aims for a pOsitional advantage. 12.... 0-0 13. ~c1-f4 ~d6xf4 14. ttJe2xf4 ttJf6-e4 15. ttJf4-e2! ~cS-d7 16. ttJe2-g3 ttJe4xg3 17. h2xg3 As often happens in these variations, it not clear which weakness is greater: White's d4-pawn or Black's eS -square. E222) 11 ....
'iidS-c7
Preventing the thematic ~f4. 185
Chess Op ening Essentials - Volume E223) 11 ....
12. i1l.c1-g5
With the idea of going to g3! The move 12 .g3 is also interesting - always with the idea of exchanging the dark-squared bishops in mind after 12 ... 0-0 13 .~f4. Now Black maintains equality with the aggressive 13 ... tLlg4!? 12. ... 13. i1l.g5-h4!
0-0
0-0
Simply continuing his development. White almost always proceeds with the strategically appealing 12. i1l.c1-f4
which, however, allows Black a certain amount of counterplay: 12. ... 13. tLle2xf4
i1l.d6xf4 tLlf6-e4!
Black was threatening the annoying 13 ... tLlg4, which would now simply be met by ~g3. At this point 13. ...
tLlf6-h5
seems to be the most logical step. The latest find here is 14. 'iYd1-c2!
Among the various moves which are playable at this point (14.g3, 14.tLle2 and 14.tLlhS), the most popular at the moment is the unnatural-looking 14. ~d1-c1
since 14 ..llcl g6!, with the idea of applying pressure to d4 with the ~ on g7, has proved to be good for Black (now 14 ... g6? does not work because of 15. ~xg6).
14. ... 15. i1l.d3-g6
h7-h6
Now Black sacrifices the exchange : 15. 16. 17. 18.
... g2xf3 'it'g1-h1 tLle2-g3!
llf8xf3 i1l.d6xh2+ tLlh5-f4
And we have a position which is difficult to weigh up, notwithstanding the many games played from this position. 186
Defending the f4-knight and preparing a transfer to the excellent e3 -square. A delightful though unforced line that often occurs is 14. 15. 16. 17.
... tLle4-g5! tLlf3xg5 'iYd8xg5 .J1Ld3xh7+!? wg8xh7 tLlf4xe6
which exploits the undefended black queen and the intermediate check on f8 to obtain a rook and 2 pawns for a knight and a bishop. If Black either exchanges queens or defends the rook with the queen, the resulting positions seem to be easier for White to play, even if they are not objectively superior from his point of view.
French Defence - Tarrasch Variation ...
'.
...,
. ', •. t~
.....
.".'
",
Iordachescu,Viorel . Volkov,Sergey ;
Tal,Mikhail Portisch,Lajos Montrea,'1979 (IS)
..
Moscow '2007 (4)
'1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.3 0-0 9.
PillsburY:':H~;y
..... '., .
Maroczy,Geza Paris 1900 (6)
.', ..~~" ..,.~, ..
..
Tarrasch.Siegbert ':
i,1 .e4 e6 2.d4 dS' 3.ibd2 h1 j5 ,. 19.~h1 " n ceS 20.kcS 1IIe7 . .ltd7 14.a3 Yl.e7 1S.f5 0-0-0 16.tLlf4, ~ 21.,be7 J:1xe7 22.g4 ibe6 23J1aa1 :. ~bS 17J%e1 ~e8 ·18.fxe6 l:tdS' fxg4 '·' 24.'i'M g6 " 25.1IIxg4 rIg7 19..tfS ibd8 20.b4 ibdxe6 21.ffb3' ' 26.h4 tbe7 " 27.ibd4 lbfS 2S..ltxf5 'ifdS . 22.l:ta2 ibgS 23 ..bc8 wxc8 gxf5 29.1i'h5 "dS 30.J:!.g1 ',llf7 ,' 24.J:tae2 ' ibe4 25.ibxd5 t llxdS ,31.'li'h6 ,'ite7 3Vbf3 . ~h8 · 33.<.t.o>h2 " 26JIxe4 tbg6 " 27.l:txe7 · ibxe7 ,.tUS , 34.hS 1:1g4 . 35.lt:Jg5 .!:txf4 .2S.lbe7 'it'xe7 29.'it'xd5 wb8 30.h3 .36.ibf7+'itxf7 ;, 37:6i'xf4 'ifxhS+ ' . . 'fIe7 ' 3Ul.e3 nes 32.it.g1 ~aS , ;3S.W93 'iWe2 39.~M .!:te8 40J%ae1 ' 33:fUe5 'i¥d7 34.d5 b6 3S.1!YC6+:; , ~xb2 41.~h3 l:1xe3+ 42J%g3 J:4e2 ~xe6 36.dxc6 lle6 37.b5 a6 3S.a4 ;43JIh1 ' l:!.c8 44.tfh6 \!Vxe5 11e4 39.it.d4 fS 40.85 axb5 41.axb6 ~,45.'fixh7:r.~J(,h!_~6.~g2.X ,_.,.... ,1~O " ,.. J:te6 ,42.b7+ ~bS 43.~e5+ . 1-0 !
187
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
added advantage that there is not much theory to study. After many years in a slump, the Rubinstein Variation has become relatively popular on the professional circuit as a means of obtaining draws against players of the same level. However, it is rare at lower levels, where defensive technique is not as refined.
4. ...
When White defends the e4-pawn with tUc3 or tUd2 on his third move, Black has an interesting jOint variation (in the sense that it can arise from both 3.tt:ld2 and 3.tt:lc3): the controversial Rubinstein Variation 3 ...dxe4. After 4.tUxe4, the position is reminiscent of the Caro-Kann with the difference that there is a black pawn on e6 instead of on c6. The fact that the light-squared bishop can no longer develop to f5 is an obvious disadvantage, yet it is also true that the freeing ...c7 -c5 advance takes place in one move and the c8-bishop can always develop later to b7 or to c6 via d7 . Obviously, White has a freer game and a nice space advantage, and this was reason enough for Tarrasch to condemn the variation. However, practice has shown us that Black's position is solid and that a patient player can obtain reasonable p OSitions, with the 188
ttlbS-d7
The direct 4 ... tt:lf6 can be followed by 5. tUxf6+!, either leaving the black queen exposed on f6 or spoiling Black's pawn structure in the event of 5 ...gxf6. The move 4 ... i1ld7 pops up every now and then (compared to ... b6 and ... ~b7 this does not weaken the b5- and c6squares) and after 5'tU£3 ~c6 6 ...td3 Black has a solid, but perhaps excessively passive position. Let us return to 4 ... tt:ld7.
S. ttlg1-f3 S. ttle4xfS+
ttlgS-fS
Simplifying the position, but White does not lose a tempo retreating the knight.
S. ... 7. i1l.f1-d3
ttld7xfS c7-cS The most natural reaction. White will obtain active piece play in an open position:
S. d4xcS! 9. ~ d1-e2
il.fSxcS
French Defence - Rubinstein Variation Thus, White reserves the possibility of a solid approach with 0-0, ~gS and 1:tad 1, or a more aggressive one with ~d2lgS and 0-0-0. In both cases, opening theory claims a small advantage for White, but in practical play the ensuing positions provide each player with possibili ti es.
,SteiliitiWilhelm "Bird,Henry London m2 1866 (9)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3/bc3 dxe4 4.t21xe4 ,t21c6 5.tLlf3 tLlf6 " 6.tLlxf6+ ..wxf6 7..ig5 'ii'f5 B..td3 'iYg4 9.h3 ..wxg2 10.l:th2 'il'xh2 11.tLlxh2 4:lxd4 12.~bS+ 1-0
Volokitin,Andrey . Nakamura.Hikaru
43.bx~ a544~iaS+ wh7 45~'iWxa5 'iWxc4 4S.e6 'iitg6 47:~c7 'iVd4 48.h4 'iWg1+ 49.<J;>h3 'iVh1+ 50.~h2 ~c1 5UWe5 "a3+ 52.~g3 'it>h7 53.h5 Jie7 54.\i'f5+ whS 55.'iWg6 .tfS 56.wh2 ~c5 57.h6 gxh6 •5S.Jih4 'iWd6+ 59.wh3 .1t.g7 60.'iWe4 ~gS 61.1';'f5 ..wa3+62 •.tg3 ilie7 63 ..th4 'ii'a3+ "64.'ii'f3 'ii'e1 65.e7 'iWc8+ 66.wh2 'iVe6 67.'fi'h5 'ife5+ 6S:ifxe5 A xe5+ ' 69..tg3 .bg3+ 70.'it>xg3 'iitf7 71.Wg4 'iitxe7 72.wh5 wf6 73.wxh6 'iitf5 74.h5 wf6 75.g4 <J;>g7 76.'it>g5 wh7 77.wf6 h6 7S.g5+ wh7 79.wf7 hB 80.<.f.>g6 1-0 '" Tarrasch,Siegbert Rubinstein.Akiba " San Sebastian 191 1 (6)
.' 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.tLlc3 dxe4 4.tLlxe4 tLld7 5.tiJf3 tLlgf6 6.A d3 iLe77.0-0 Lausanne 2005 (3) '" .1.e4 e6 2.d4 dS 3.tLlc3 dxe4 4.4:lxe4 0-0 8.ti:Jxf6+ tLlxf6 9.tLle5 <:5 10.dxc5 ~d7 S.tLlf3 ~c6 6 :~d3 tLld7 7.0-0 'fHc7 H:ii'e2 .bc5 12..itg5 tLld7 tLlgf6 B.tLlg3 Jie7 9.l:le1 .bf3 13.tLlxd7 .bd7 14.ttad1 iLc6 , ' 10.'iWxf3 c6 H.e3 0-0 12.~f4 J:[eB 15.'ii'h5 g6 '16.1Wh4 lUe8 17.r::fe1 13.I:!:ad1 YWb6 14...tc1 cS 15.dxc5 .te7 18•.txe7 ~xe7 19.~xe7 ttxe7 tzlxc5 16.R,c2 l:adB 17.ttxdB .bdB 20.iLe4 .tre8 21.c3 eS 22.lid6 .be4 1B.tLlh5 , tiJxh5 19~.1t.xh7+ 'it>xh7 23.l:txe4 f5 24J:la4 b6 25.g4 e4 20.~xf7 nfB 21,'ii'xfB tLld3 22JWf3 26.gxfS gxf5 27.wf1 'iitf7 2S.J::.ad4 tLlhf4 23 ..lhf4 tLlxe124.'ife4+ ~hS u'e6 29J:1d7+ U,e7 30.t!4d5 r::xd7 25.b3 WaS 26.'irxe1 ifxa2 27.'iYd1 31.l:xd7+ 'it>g6 32Jba7 l:tdB ~b6 2S.~g3 'iVb2 " 29.c4 'ii'c3 . 33J% a6 U,d2 34.l:txb6+ wg5 35.we1 30.wh1 e5 31.h3 ~d4 32.Wh2 wgS . r::c2 36.nb5 wg4 ' 37.h3+ wxh3 33.'il'b1 a6 34.~h4 'ti'd2 3S.~g6 38J:txfS J:txb2 39.1:1f4 u'xa2 40Jbe4 ~f4+ 36.Jig3 'ti'f737.'iWg5 'ti'e6 h5 41.c4 wg2 42J:tf4 l:t.c2 43Jlh4 \pf3 ' 44.wd1 . J:xf2 45.c5 we3 3S.\i'dS+ 'it>h7 39.~h4+ ~gS 40.'iVe4 b5 41.14 bxc4 42.fxe5 ~c5 46. ~xh5 'it>d4 , 1f2-V2
189
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
French Defence Classical Variation 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3. ~ c3 'U6
White's third most played move re mains, even if by only a small margin, 3.~c3.
White is not worried about the knight getting pinned or about blocking his c-pawn. His greater central control produces sharper positions, and therefore this variation is usually preferred by aggressive players. This is not an academic consideration, as is demonstrated by the fact that 3 ... c5? is an excellent move in the Tarrasch Variation, but here it is a grave mistake. 4.exd5 exd5 and then 5.dxc5! follows, with a clear advantage for White. Back to 3. ~c3. The classical 3 ... ~ f6 is more solid than 3 ... ~b4, the Winawer Variation. At the end of the 20th century it experienced a revival, probably because it is a way to avoid the excessive amount of accumulated theory pertaining to the Winawer. White can now defend e4 by advancing the pawn or by pinning the ~f6. 190
A) 4. e4-e5 The so-called Steinitz Variation. White gains space on the kingside, but Black's typical reaction of ... c7 -cS is now more effective because of the knight on c3.
tLlf6-d7 4. Now White usually supports the eS-pawn with 5. f2-f4 and leaves the d4-square, when it is cleared by dxc5 or ... cxd4, for his pieces. The very old move 5. ~ce2 has recently become fashionable, thanks to the efforts of Shirov and Anand. After 5 ... c5, the centre can be supported with 6.c3. The ensuing positions resemble, and at times transpose to, the Tarrasch Variation with 3 ... 0f6. After 6 ... ~c6 7.£4
7 ... 'iVb6 (or 7 .. .b5!?) 8. ~f3 f6!?, you have a double-edged position with chances for both sides.
French Defence - Cla ssical Variation c7-cS S. S. ttJ g1-f3 ttJb8-cS 7. ~c1-e3! Reaching the variation's key position. Black now has three options.
A1)
7....
a7-aS
Preparation for queenside counterplay with 8 ... bS. White maintains a good positional advantage thanks to his control of the d4-square with a timely dxcS .
A2) 7.... 'liVd8-bS Counterattacking b 2, even if there is 8. ttJc3-a4! 'liVbS-aS+ 9. c2-c3 cSxd4 9 ...c4!? is playable, but 10.b4! gives White a slight edge. 10. b2-b4! ttJcSxb4 11. c3xb4 iLf8xb4+ 12. ~e3-d2 ~b4xd2+ 13. ttJf3xd2
Practice has shown that the white knight is stronger than Black's three pawns.
A3) 7.... cSxd4 For the abovementioned reasons, Black usually opts for this solid line. 8. ttJf3xd4 9. 'liVd1-d2
~f8-cS
Black can now exchange twice on d4 and continue with 11 ... 'Ili¥b6; but the resulting endgame, though manageable, is not exactly exhilarating. Black can also maintain the tension: 0-0 9 .... 10.0-0-0 a7-aS 11. h2-h4 ttJcSxd4 In order to play ... b7 -bS. 12. ~e3xd4 b7-bS 13 . .t!.h1-h3 bS-b4 14. ttJc3-a4 ~cSxd4 1S. 'iYd2xd4 as-aS White's apparent central control is something of an illusion: in practice, o pposite -side castling and Black's counterplay on the c-file will mean that there are good chances for both players. This is confirmed by the statistics, which show Black doing very well. However, it must be noted that, curiously, the black players had a higher average Elo rating than the white players. 191
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
This is also true of the 3 ... c5 line in the French Tarrasch. It is evident that this is one of those lines which is greatly appreciated by highly-rated players, but much less so by mere mortals. B)
4. jLc1-gS
The old main line is positionally justified by the fact that the exchange of the bad dark-squared bishop for the opponent's good dark-squared bishop is theoretically recommended for White. However, it is also true that every piece exchange will assist the ambitions of the player with the more cramped position; in this case, Black. After 4. ~ g5, Black has three variations at his disposal. All three are very different in terms of their competitive and strategic characteristics. If Black wants to win, then the McCutcheon Variation is certainly the right choice. In terms of fighting spirit and strategic characteristics, it is correctly considered to be the connecting link between the Classical French and the Winawer. B1) 4.... ~fS-b4 Here we have the controversial McCutcheon Variation. There are those who have said that after 4 .. .~b4, 192
both players are worse off! Indeed, after the main line sequence S. e4-eS h7-h6 jLb4xc3 6. jLgS-d2! 7. b2xc3! ttJf6-e4 S. 'iWd1-g4 g7-g6 - 8 .. .>t>f8!? is probably better than its reputation 9. ~f1-d3 ttJe4xd2 10. we1xd2 c7-cS
both kings would prefer to be somewhere quieter. There are evident weaknesses on Black's kingside, and the pawn advance h4-h5, often combined with the manoeuvre .l:!:h3-g3, can be very dangerous for Black. However, the king on d2 gives Black chances of qUick counterplay with ... cxd4 and .. :~l'a5+, for example: 11. ttJg1-f3 ttJbS-c6 12. h2-h4 cSxd4 13.c3xd4 ~dS-aS+ 14. >t>d2-e3 b7-b6 1S. ~ g4-f4 ~cS-a6 16. 'i!Yf4-f6 UhS-gS and it is not clear which of the two kings is more exposed to danger.
B2) 4 .... dSxe4 The Burn Variation, which has evident similarities to the Rubinstein. How-
French Defence - Classical Variation ever, with the Burn, the presence of the bishop on g5 offers Black the favourable possibility of exchanging pieces, which is always most welcome in cramped positions. ~f8-e7 5. ttJc3xe4 6. ~g5xf6! The best response, which does not lose time defending e4, and does not excessively simplify matters, as is the case with 6.ttJxf6+. After 6 .. .ii.xf6 and 7.ttJf3, we have a typical position in which White has a small central domination (d4 pawn against e6-pawn). White either seeks to qUietly exploit his minute advantage, or he castles queenside and tries a pawn assault on the black king. More combative is the alternative move g7xf6!? 6. ...
IJiI.t.~. · ~~ . ~ .t~ '''~
solid of the alternatives has lost a lot of its past popularity. Thi s is more a question of fashion than objective consideration. 5. e4-e5 is by far the most popular response. The Anderssen Variation 5 .~xf6 is considered to be a bit of a museum piece, but like many variations that have fallen into disuse, it may only need a bit of spit and polish, and it will prove to be playable. 5. ... ttJf6-d7
I
~
~.t.
Tartakower's move S... ttJe4 has not stood the test oftime. At this point White is at a crossroads; and as is so often the case, the choice is between aggression and solidity. Along the lines of the Bronstein-Larsen Variation of the Caro-Kann, with the difference that Black has the bishop pair. The books claim that White has a small advantage, but in reality you reach those typical, strategically complex positions where the stronger player will win. 83) ~f8-e7 4 .... The Classical Variation of the Classical French! The most strategic and
831) 6. h2-h4!? The historic Chatard-AIekhine Attack, which remains a dangerous weapon, even though Black has nothing to fear with correct play. It is difficult to say which is the best continuation for Black. Taking twice on g5 after 8.'iVd3, (or 8.ttJh3) gives White obvious compensation, but whether it is sufficient to provide him with an advantage is still uncertain. 193
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I Black has several playable moves (6 ... a6, 6 ... 0-0, 6 ...h6), but the most combative is c7-c5! 6 .... A fearle ss move, as Black knows that his king will have to go to e7 after 7. ~ g5xe7! <;!;>e8xe7!
Perhaps 7.. .'~xe7 is playable, but it obliges Black to make a risky sacrifice after s.ltJb5! O-O! 9JiJ c7 cxd4 IO.ltJxaS . 8. 12-f4 Unlike in the Classical Variation, Black has already advanced his pawn to c5, and the queen is ready to move across to the queenside. On the other hand, the king's position on e7 is a bit of a worry. 8 .... W8d8-b6 9. ttJc3-a4 ~ b6-a5+ 10. c2-c3 b7-b6! Preparing the thematic ...~ a6, with a satisfactory position. 832)
6. ~g5xe7 7. f2-f4
~d8xe7
0-0
The immediate 7...c5? is an error because of 8.ttJb5!, after which the knight threatens to go to c7, and also to give an annoying check ond6.
8. ttJg1-f3 194
c7-c5
We have a position that has been reached in hundreds of games. Black will obviously play on the queenside; at times Black - when White does not exchange on c5 and castles queenside plays ... c5-c4. For his part, White can castle queenside, launching a kingside attack using his pawns and the bishop on d3. Otherwise, when Black plays ... f7 -f6, White will play exf6 and then place his two rooks on the d- and e-files, with the aim of controlling the centre: in particular the e5 -square. If Black does not respond dynamically to this, he will have to play the classic endgame where a centrally-placed white knight dominates Black's bad bishop. The game generally continues with 9. 'iWd1-d2 9.i.d3, threatening the classic sacrifice on h7 followed by ttJg5+ and ~h5, can be comfortably met by 9 ... f6!. 9. ... ttJ b8-c6 10. d4xc5! Here Black can continue with the ambitious Io .. .'fhc5, which prevents White's kingside castling and prepares ...ttJb6 after 11.0-0-0, followed by ... i.d7 and ... ttJc6-a5-c4, with a strong initiative against White's king. The problem is that Black must always be careful. After 1 I .i.d3, the i.xh7+ sac-
French Defence - Classical Variat io n
rifice, followed by tLlg5+ and 'i'fd3, though not necessarily winning, gives White a dangerous attack. This position is a tough one to evaluate. Anything could happen. If instead Black has more positional inclinations he can play 10. ... f7-f6!? 11. e5xf6 ~ e7xf6! It is best to keep control of e5 . tLld7xcS 12. 92-93 13. 0-0-0 l:(fS-dS
;'2'2.tbb3 axb4 23.axb4 tLla4 24.'ittf2 .exfS 2S.gxfS lleS "26Jlfe1tLlb2 i 27.,lhaS l'!xaS 2S.e6 · fxe6 29.lZlcs :~es 30.fxe6 . <MS 31.'itte3 tLlxd3 . ,32.cxd3 ,'J:Ia2 : 33.Wd4 we7 34.h3 · Illh2 3S.l'!e3 ~g6 ' 36.wxd5 AfS , ~ 37.l:[f3 96 3S.d4 J:l:e2 39",tJ'c6 J:l:xe6+ , ,40.t2Jxe6 .te4+ 41.dS .bt3 42.lZlgS , t,i92 , 43.tLlxh7 1i.e4 44.h4 '. ~g2 :4S.tLl9S ,wfs 46.wc5 we7 47.lZle6 :wf6 ,<4S.tLld4 We5 49.d6 Ah3 tSO.tbxbS 1-0 : ~.
.~~
;~. Teichmann,Richard
,John,Walter .. . Ost~~d-B 1907 (13) . ,.
Not 13 ... ~7? 14.tLlxd5J exd5 15.'Vlifxd5+.
14. 'ird2-f2! The most recent idea. 14. ... b7-b6 15. ~f1-g2 ~cS-d7 16. J:rh1-e1 with a small plus for White.
;f'"
Kamsk¥.Gata '
, Socko,Bartosz , '.
Turin 012006 (4)'
~ 1.e4
e6 2.d4 d5 3.tLlc3 tLlf6 4.eS ;lZlfd7 S.f4 cS 6.lZlf3lZlc6 7..te3 cxd4 S.tLlxd4 ~cS 9.'ifd2 0-0 10.93 tLlxd4 ,,1 1.~xd4 a6 ·12.hcS tLlxc5 13.fg d4 ' 1Vc7 14..itd3 bS 1S.a3 ~d7 16.0-0 lZla4 17.tLle2 ~fcS 1S.94 a519.fS '(WcS 20.b4 'ii'xd4+ 21.tLlxd4 tLlc3
:;.<
·,1.e4 eS 2.d4 ,d5 3.tLlc3 tLlfS 4.~gS tt b4 5.eS hS S..te3 tt:ie4 7.'ifg4 WfS : ;S.~d3 lZlxc3 9.a3 iLaS 10~d2 cS ;'11.bxC3 cxd4 12.cxd4 i.xd2+ ;13.wxd2 'ifgS+ 14:ibgS hxgS ;1 5 J :tfl tLlc6 16.tLle2 'tie7 17.14 gxf4 :,1SJ:txf4 ~d719.J:l:hf1 1%af8 20.h3 f5 ,21.exf6+ gxf6 ' 22.l:t4f2 llh6 23.c3 j wd6 24.tLlf4 fS 25.J:le1 tLlaS 26JUe2 :XeS 27JXb1 b6 2S.I1e3 llgS 29.~e1 J:teS ,.30.'ito>d2 ~a4 31.:.tf1 tLlb3+ ' 32.we1 tLlaS 33.J:Xb2 i.d7 34.g3 J:!.eS 35.h4 tLlc6 36.l.'td2 lZle7 37.~e2 · "tLlgS ' 3S.tLld3 : e7 39/b eS tLlf6 !40.ii.d3 ~eS 41 ..ttf2 J:Ic7 42."'d2 ~hS 43.11f1 ~eS 44.tLlf3 ~hS 45.lZlgS lZle4+ 46.be4 dxe4 47.wc2 :thS 48.Wb2 ~g4 49.J:[f4 , A hS SO.:f2 .\k.g4 51.1%f1 l:[gS S2.:'f2 'ittdS 53.l:th2 b5 S4.J:U2 a5 5SJH4 b4 S6.axb4 axb4 S7.cxb4 · l::tc4 5S.J:la3 ttxb4+ 59.Wc3 J:tb5 60.wd2 J:l:gbS 6UI.f1 J:l: b2+ 62.we3 l'!Sb3+ 63.J:l:xb3 l::txb3+ 64.wf2 e3+ 6S.wg2 J:td3 66J~e1 lld2+ 67.wf1 195
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
J:!d3 ;, 68.>t>g2 e2 69.ttJh3 ",xd4 70.ttJf4 l:d2 71.<.1o>f2 e5 72.ttJg2 J:[d3 73.J:[a1 llf3+ 74.\t>g1 llxg3 75.lt>f2 1:(f3+ 76.'.tg1 f4 0-1
Nataf,Igor-Alexandre Riazantsev,Alexander
.
Portugal u2006 (I)
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.ttJc3 ttJf6 4.~g5 if.e7 5':e5 ttJfd7 6.h4 ' c5 7.ii.xe7 rtlxe7 S:ifg4 l2Jc6 9.dxc5 ttJdxe5 10.W6xg7 J:[gS 11.11bh7 ii.d7 12.0-0-0 'iifa5 13.'i1i'h6 d4 14.ttJge2 dxc3 ,15.ttJxc3 lladS 16.ttJe4 l2Jg4 17.'ii'd2 'it'xa2 18.1t'd6+ weS 19Ji.d3.tcS 20.'t!fc7'iifa1+ 2V,t>d2 'ii'a5+ 22.lWxa5 ttJxa5 23.11a1 ttJc4+ 24.>t>e2 f5 25.ii.xc4 fxe4 26.1ba7 llfS 27.13 exf3+ 2S.gXt3 ttJe5 29.i.b5+ ii.d7 ; 30.J:[xb7 ii.xb5+ 31.11xb5 ttJxf3 32.c3 ttJe5 33.h511gS 34.h6 llg2+ 35.We3 lldd2 36.c6 ttJc4+: 37.'M3 lldf2+ 3S.'.te4 J:[g4+ " 39.>t>d311d2X :, 0-1
196
. Stefansson,Hannes Kortchnoi, Viktor Gothenburg Ech-tt 2005 (3)
1.e4e6' 2.d4 d5 3.ttJc3 ttJf6 4.ii.g5 §;.e7 5.e5 ttJfd7 6.Jt..xe7 'ifxe7 7.14 ttJb6 S.ttJf3 Jt..d7 9.'ifd2 a6 10.h4 ttJc6 11.h5 h6 12.l2Jd1 ttJa7 13.l2Je3 Jt..b5 ' 14.0-0-0 c5 15.15 ii.xf1 ,16.11dxf1 ttJc6 17.c3 0-0-0 1S.l2Jh4 cxd4 19.cxd4 ttJc4 20.l2Jxc4 dxc4 21.fxe6 1t'xe6 22.ttJf3 Ild7 23J%h4 J:[hdS 24..lld1 ,i wbS 25.¥!Yc3 ttJe7 26.ttJe1 ttJd5 27.~h3 'tifxh3 2SJlxh3 ttJf4 29.11e3 J:[xd4 30.11xd4 llxd4 31.ttJf3 ttJxg2 32.11e2 llg4 33.~d2 ttJf4 34.J:[e4 " J:[g2+ 35.wc3l2Jxh5 36.ttJd4 tbg3 37.l:tf4 ttJe2+ 3S.ttJxe2 llxe2 39.11xf7 g5 40.11h7 l:txe5, 41.llxh6 g4 42.~xc4 rIg5 43Jlh2 g3 44.J:[g2 e3 '.t>c5 41.<;;13 ~b4 4S.We2 'it>c4 49.we3 J:tg7 50.J:tc2+ wd5 51.lld2+ ~e5 52.J:[g2 '1t>f5 53.Wf3 a5 54.b3 b5 0-1
French Defence - Winawer Variation
French Defence Winawer Variation 1.e4 cG 2.d4 d5 3. ~ c3 ~b4
notwithstanding the poor results he had against the Winawer (or perhaps for that very reason!), considered it to be positionally unsound! 4.e5 is the move most often chosen by White. However, before looking at that, we will have a brief look at the minor alternatives. While none of these put the soundness of the Winawer in doubt, they can be most dangerous if Black is not sufficiently prepared. A) 4. a2-a3 The most direct.
4 . ...
At a deep level this is very logical: Black indirectly attacks the e4-pawn without allowing White to gain a tempo with the pawn advance e4-e5, and reserves e7 for his king's knight. The obvious drawback is that the bishop on b4 very often ends up being exchanged for the knight on c3, with a consequent weakening of the dark squares, which in some variations can result in the black king's safety being put in jeopardy. However, Black enjoys long-term advantages thanks to the doubled white pawn on c3 and the excellent play offered on the queenside - at least in the Classical Winawer. Like all the openings, it has virtues which compensate for its defects. Nonetheless, the Winawer manages to polarize opinions in a particularly pronounced fashion. This becomes clear when you consider the fact that former World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik used it for years as his main weapon against 1.e4, while another World Champion, Bobby Fischer,
~b4xc3+
5. b2xc3 d5xe4 White concedes the e4-pawn with the idea of exploiting the enemy's weakened kingside with
6. ~d1-g4 The gambit 6f3?! is interesting bu t probably lIot completely sound. t2igS-f6! 6. 7. 'iiVg4xg7 S. 'lWg7-h6 9. t2ig1-e2
llhS-gS t2ibS-d7 c7-c5
Black reaches a balanced pOSition in which the weakness of the dark squares is compensated for by better development. In practical play, the results are slightly in Black's favour, which is a 197
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 simple enough explanation for this line's lack of popularity with white players.
B) 4. ~d1-g4 Another very direct line: g7 is undefended and White attacks it. 4.
...
lDgB-fS!
Black must always react energetically to justify the positional deficiencies of the Winawer. ~ hB-gB 5. ~g4xg7 S. ~g7-hS Again, Black must respond dynamically:
5.
...
lDgB-fS
Or 5 ... ~xd4 6.0-0-0 h5! 7.~e2!? ~d7 8 .lDxe4, with an unclear game. S.
~g4xg7
.l::!:hB-gB
7.
~g7-hS
~dBxd41
B.
0-0-0
~ b4-fB!
An excellent idea of Bronstein's, which he played in his 1950 match against Isaac Boleslavsky. 9. 'i\'hS-h4 10. ~ h4-h3 11. ~f1-e2
n gB-g4 ~ d4xf2!
J:lg4-h4!
S. ... c7-c5! After 6... dxe4?! 7.lDe2!, White is better. 7. e4-e5 c5xd4 B. a2-a3 ~ b4-fB!
Deliberately rising to the bait. 12. 'llIYh3xh4 13. g2-g3
~f2xh4
This would appear to win back the queen with interest, but in reality there is :
9. 'ti'hSxfS 10. e5xfS
'llIYdBxfS d4xc3
13 .... 14.g3xh4 15. 'it>c1xd2
with a small advantage for Black. C)
4. iiLc1-d2
The Keres Gambit. White prevents the creation of a doubled pawn on c3 but allows the e4-pawn to be taken. 4. ... d5xe4 5. 'llIYd1-g4! Alekhine played 5.lDxe4?, but after 5 ... VWxd4 White does not have sufficient compensation.
198
e4-e3 e3xd2+ j&cB-d7
and if one of the players is better off, it is Black. He may have lost the exchange, but the two united passed eand f-pawns are supported by his two bishops, and they will soon start to advance. White's pOSition is not easy to play. D)
4.
e4xd5
5.
~f1-d3
eSxd5
French Defence - Winawer Variation
5 ... ~e7 6. 0,xe4 0,f6 is also perfectly playable, giving Black an improved version of the Rubinstein Variation 6. ttJe2xc3
This move has been relatively popular since the 1990s as a reasonably safe way of avoiding the strategic complexity of the Winawer, ending up with a sort of improved version of the Exchange Variation. After the exchange on c3, if Black develops his knight to e7 to avoid the pin with ~g5, plans centred around 'iVh5 have proved to be troublesome. When this line was first used, players had difficulty dealing with it. However, after a while, the remedy was found : 5. ... c7-c6! This allows the b4-bishop to return to d6 after 6 .a3; or, after the natural 6.t2le2, Black can continue with 6.J[je7 without haVing to fear 'iYh5 . E) 4. ttJg1-e2 One of the most solid alternatives to 4.e5, which is very popular at low levels of play, where there is a tendency to avoid the doubled c-pawn. 4. ... d5xe4 Both 4 ... 0,f6 and 4 ... 0,c6 are also playable. 5. a2-a3 The idea is that if Black wants to keep the e4-pawn he will have to do without his dark-squared bishop. 5. ... ~b4xc3+
Now the avaricious 6 ... f5?! is perhaps not as bad as people say: however, it does give White a promising position after 7.f3! exf3 8.'ihf3. Therefore the best thing is to counterattack on the d4-square: 6. ... ttJbS-c6! 7. d4-d5!? A logical attempt to open up the game for the two bishops. 7.jLb5 0,e7 8.0,xe4 a6leads to equality. 7. ... e6xd5 S. ~d1xd5 ttJgS-e7 and neither player has the advantage. We will now return to the main move: 4. e4-e5 White's closing of the centre would indicate a reaction on the flanks and indeed, 4 ... c5 is the most popular move here. Leaving aside 4 ... 0,e7, which usually leads back to the main line, there are valid alternatives that are often based on the attempt to exchange the bad c8-bishop for White's good one with ... b7 -b6. These alternatives are pOSitionally justified, although it is im199
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 portant to underline that Black remains dangerously behind in development, and that White has a big space advantage. You are therefore dealing with lines that are suitable for solid and patient players who like to manoeuvre behind their own lines. There also exists another incredible alternative, which we will look at first :
4 ....
A)
i1l.b4-fS!?
Compared to the normal Advance Variation, White already has his knight on c3 and it's his turn to move! However, Black will try to prove that the knight is badly placed on c3, where it blocks the c2-pawn. In addition, on f8 the bishop defends g7 from the ~g4 incursion and Black prepares ... b6 and .. ..¥La6. If White believes these considerations to be valid, he could continue with the even more paradoxical 5.ttJbl!? returning to the 3.e5 variation ... But usually White is sceptical and continues with the natural 5.liJf3. Black's tournament results, though not exceptional, are acceptable. Please note that you can often reach this pOSition via the Steinitz Variation(!!) with the move sequence 3 ... tUf6 4.e5 tUg8. 200
B) ~dS-d7 4 . ... This move is more 'normal', even if it appears unnatural: it serves to defend g7 from aside. Black will play ... f? -f5 if White moves his queen to g4.
This side-defence of g7 is better achieved from d7 than from e7. because it leaves the e7 -square vacant for the knight, whereas the c8-bishop develops to a6. Usually, White proceeds with 5. a2-a3 ~ b4xc3+ The move 5 ... .¥Lf8!? is also playable here, for the reasons explained before ... but why play the Winawer if you are not prepared to concede the bishop? 6. b2xc3 b7-b6 The obvious strategic objective is to exchange the bad bishop. 7.
~ d1-g4
The most energetic. f7-f5 7. S. 'iYg4-g3 ~cS-a6 9. ~f1xa6 lLlb8xa6 10. lLlg1-e2 Heading for f4. lLla6-bS! 10. ... With the intention of going to c4 via c6-a5. 11. lLle2-f4 weS-f7!? Preparing ... tUe7; the move 11 ... tUc6 is too risky because of 12.tUxe6! VJilxe6 13.~xg7
French Defence - Winawer Variation
and White would appear to have the advantage. White in effect has a certain initiative after 12. '&'g3-f3 t2Jg8-e7 13. 'iYf3-h5+! ~f7-g8 14. J:th1-g1 with the idea of advancing the pawn to g4. However, Black's position is very solid and not easy to break down.
C) 4 .... b7-b6 Prophylactically defending g7 turns out to be unnecessary. 5. 'iWd1-g4 .i&.b4-f8 This could be the reply to S .a3, too, although S... ~xc3+ 6.bxc3 lDe7 is more in the spirit of the Winawer. 6. ~c1-g5 ~d8-d7 7. f2-f4 ~c8-a6 White has a tiny edge. As we have pOinted out above, the most popular move is
4 ....
c7-c5
5. t2Jg8-e7! White's idea was lDbS with the unpleasant threat of a check on d6. Black therefore hurries to castle. For this reason the natural-looking 5... cxd4?! is of doubtful merit: if the black king has to move to f8, White's attack can become very dangerous. 6. t2Jc3-b5 6.a3 and 6.dxcS!? are playable, even though not problematic for Black. 6. .i&.b4xd2+ 7. '&'d1 xd2 0-0 8. c2-c3 White has preserved the integrity of his centre, but at the price of a slight lag in development and his bS-knight is away from the action. Black will be able to reach equality by developing normally. B)
5. ~d1-g4
which puts White's centre in crisis. Here the most common continuation is S.a3, which aims to solidify the centre. However, two important alternatives for White are worth noting .. A)
5.
~c1-d2
Not as dangerous here as it is on the 7th move, when - after the exchange on c3 201
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 - the centre is less fluid. However, the move should not be treated lightly. 5. ... tLlgS-e7 Naturally, Black will not lose time defending g 7. He seeks counterplay speculating on White's unstable centre. 6. tLlg1-f3! A positional choice. 6.'fllxg7?! is premature because of 6...l!1gB 7.'fllh6! cxd4 B.a3 Lc3+ (with the queen on h7, the move 8 ... '/:IVas would be extremely powerful, as after 9.axb4 ~xal the bishop on c1 would now be unprotected) 9.bxc3 'l:\Yc7 and Black has an improved version of the main line 7. ViVg4. Back to 6.tLlf3. Now the simplest reply is 6. ... c5xd4 7. tLlf3xd4 tLle7-g6! which counterattacks the e5-pawn: defending it with a piece is not easy and £'2-f4 leaves the white queenside in trouble after ... tLlc6 and ... ~ a5.
A) 5 .... c5xd4 Starting a tactical sequence typical of the Nimzo-Indian, where after a2-a3 Black takes on d4 so he can retreat the bishop to e7. But here White has another possibility: 6. a3xb4! Damaging his own pawn structure: however, White obtains play on the dark squares that is more promising than in the normal Winawer. 6. d4xc3 7. tLlg1-f3!
Let's return to the main line. 5. a2-a3 7. bxc3 ? ! 'iWc7 gives Black the advantage.
7. ... tLlgS-e7 S. ~f1-d3 White often loses a pawn; on the other hand, he has the freer game and the two bishops. B)
At this point the normal continuation is 5 ... hc3 +, which we will call the Classical Winawer. We will take a look at this after we have examined two alternatives for Black. The Hrst is 5 ... cxd4, which is rather rare: the second option 5 .. .£La5 is becoming ever more popular.
202
5.
~b4-a5
French Defence - Winawer Variation The Armenian Variation, which has been very fashionable since the late 1990s and is now threatening the historical domination of the Classical Winawer. Yet, strangely it had not been dignified with a name until a short time ago, on account of its successful adoption by the Armenian grandmasters 5mbat Lputian and Rafael Vaganian. The concept is very logical: instead of stabilizing the centre with an exchange on c3, Black keeps the tension, forcing White to take extreme measures: we are referring to Alekhine's energetic move 6. b2-b4! In the past this response was considered so strong that players were discouraged from playing S ....\taS. However, as is often the case, many of opening theory's old conclusions have been proved to be only partially true or even outright wrong. Still, although 6.b4 remains the most popular move, the search for alternative continuations that give an opening advantage is becoming more frequent; moves such as 6..td2!? or even 6.dxcS! ? The idea of 6.b4 is that after the obvious, but probably dubious 6 ... cxb4 7.tOb5!, White obtains a clear advantage, at least according to the opening theory of the past. However, after 7 ••• tOc6! 8.axb4 .\txb4+ 9.c3 .\te7 10 ..\ta3
you reach a distincdy improved version of the Sicilian Wing Gambit. This is certainly not easy for Black to meet. However, is this enough to justify speaking of an objective advantage for White? Whatever the answer to that may be, the best move is 6 .... c5xd4!
White, as is so often the case in the opening, can choose between an aggressive and a solid continuation. B1) 7. 'ilUd1-g4 The immediate 7.bxaS dxc3 8.~g4 tOe7 is simply a transposition. 7. ... liJgB-e7 B. b4xa5 8.'iWxg7 also transposes. B.... d4xc3 9. 'ilUg4xg7 .IlhB-gB 10. ~ g7xh7 liJbB-c6
~
" -f':"
A'it'. X " ... , 'iV
...
,
'f':"
203
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I Let's look at the interesting position that has arisen, which is very reminiscent of the analogous position in the Classical Winawer. Material is equal (the as -pawn will disappear soon), but strategically both positions have evident virtues and defects. White is behind in development and must defend eS; in compensation he has control of the dark squares, and in the endgame the h-pawn may be a winning trump card. For his part, Black quickly prepares .. . 0 - 0- 0 with .. .'iYc7/aS and ... ~d7, if necessary sacrificing the f7 -pawn, and he will activate his pieces - in particular his rooks - on the kingside, and the e7 -knight, moving it to fs, or to dS after ... d5-d4. Returning to concrete variations, White usually defends eS with the ambitious 11. f2-f4 This move does not contribute to White's development, which is already lagging, and the bishop on cl becomes bad. However, it reinforces the centre and prepares the insidious ttJf3-g5. The move 1 l. ttJf3 is also playable, and after 11 .. .'~Wc7! (preventing ttJgS) 12 .~f4 or I2. ~b5, the resulting positions are double-edged and give both players possibilities. A good example is the fa mous drawn game between Fischer and Tal in 1960. Let's return to the position after 11.f4. 11. ... 1ifd8xa5 12. ttJg1-f3 ~c8-d7 13. ttJf3-g5!? Or, more solidly, 13 Jlb1 0-0-0 14.'li'd3. 13. ... l:1g8xg5!? 0-0-0 14. f4xg5 with compensation for the exchange and a position that is difficult to evaluate. 204
82) 7. ttJc3-b5 The most solid alternative. 7. ... ~a5-c7 8. f2-f4 8.ttJf3 provides less reliable control of the centre, in view of 8 ... ttJc6 9 .~f4 ttJ ge7 with the idea of .. .ttJg6 . 8.
...
~c8-d7!
The latest idea. Its intention is to exchange the bad bishop if White 's knight doesn't take on c7 . 9. ttJg1-f3 If9. ttJxc7+ 'li'xc7 10.ttJf3 ttJe7 I l.~d3 a6 with the idea of .. .~b5, Black maintains eq uali ty.
9.
~d7xb5
ttJb8-d7! 10. ~f1xb5+ Here the knight has better prospects than on c6, as it is able to transfer to c4 via b6.
French Defence - Winawer Variation 11. 0-0 tt'lgS-e7 12. tt'lf3xd4 0-0 13. ~ b5-d3 g7-g6! White has a good space advantage and the two bishops, but Black is solid on the kingside, and can reasonably hope to exploit the weaknesses on White's queenside created by the pawn advance b2-b4. If the pawn were on b2, White would probably be better. However, the position as it stands is dynamically balanced.
The Classical Winawer 5 .... ~b4xc3+ 6. b2xc3 Here we have the key position of the Classical Winawer.
all the characteristics of a slow manoeuvring struggle. Naturally, White has his own trumps to play: he will seek to exploit the weakness on g7, moving the queen to g4; or develop his pieces more solidly and naturally, hoping to put his dark-squared bishop to good use when the game inevitably opens. Black can castle either kingside or queens ide, and attack the head of the white pawn chain by ... f? -f6. In the lines with kingside castling, he can advance the pawn to c4 to prevent the opening of attacking lines for White; White sometimes opens up the game with the 'sacrilegious' dxc5. It is no wonder that the Classical Winawer is considered to be such a strategically complex opening. Now, 6 .. .tiJe7 is the natural move, demonstrating that Black is not afraid of the attack on g7 with 'iWg4. However, if you wish to avoid the complications that this involves, there are two alternatives: A) 6 . ... ~dS-a5 Another case of re-evaluation. 7.
For the moment White's centre is sufficiently solid, and the usual pressure applied by Black to d4, which is typical of many French variations, is less effective here, given that White has a second c-pawn with which to support the centre. Black's trump cards are the weaknesses of the white a-pawn, the c2-pawn and the c4-square, which can be effectively occupied by a knight. In addition, Black can exert strong pressure along the c-file. The position has
~c1-d2
'iYa5-a41
Not so much to attack d4 as to prevent a3-a4. S. ~d1-g4! 205
Chess Opening Essentials - Volum e 1
8.'iYbl does not produce anything special, as there is 8 .. .c4; while after 8.tLJ f3 b6!, Black frees himself of the bad bishop with .. .~a6, with equality. 8, ... g7-g6!? An example of the beautiful complexity of chess: every position has its own individual nature. This move has always been considered to be inferior to the thematic 8 ... tLJe7, which concedes the g7 pawn in exchange for an initiative. But here 8 ... g6 is actually the best move. The difference is the attack on the c2-pawn, which is not easy to defend. This is so crucial that the best move seems to be the paradoxical 9. 'irg4-d1! A pendulum manoeuvre that also occurs in other variations of the Winawer. b7-b6! 9 .... Safer than the premature 9... cxd4?! which, by opening lines, highlights the weakness of the dark-square complex. 10. h2-h4 h7-h5 11. tLlg1-f3 ~c8-a6
and the position is balanced. B) 6, ... llVdB-c7 As in the 4 ... 'iVd7 variation, Black takes measures against "VWg4, defending g7 from aside, with the difference that c7 is a more natural square. 206
7.
llVd1-g4
White plays this all the same. However, here it would be interesting to transpose to the positional main line with 7 .tLJ f3, considering that in this variation the black queen is more actively placed on as. 7. ... f7-f5 With 7 ... tLJe7 you transpose to the Poisoned Pawn Variation, which we will look at later. However, 6 .. .'VJlic7 is generally played in order to avoid this line. An alternative option is 7 .. .f6, keeping more tension in the pawn structure. B. 'iYg4-g3 c5xd4 If 8...tLJe7?! is played immediately, then 9.'fHxg7 J:g8 1O.W!ixh7 cxd4 l1.';t;dl! is strong. g, c3xd4 tLlgB-e7 10. ~c1-d2 Now 10.'ftIxg7?? would simply lose a rook. 10. _ 0-0 11. ~f1-d3 b7-b6 12, tLlg1-e2 With its eye firmly on f4! 12.... ~c8-a6 13. tLle2-f4 'ftIc7-d7 14. h2-h4 White has an unpleasant kingside initiative, but if Black likes to play the French, this should not worry him too much.
French Defence - Winawer Variation N ow back to the main lin e. 6.
...
tiJgB-e7
We finally examine the move which is the most popular and the most combative. The diagram shows White's principal options. He has various plans to choose from.
B. 9. ~c1-d2 Thematic.
'/WdB-a5
10. 11. 12. 13.
tiJbB-c6 h7-h6 i..cB-d71
J:!:h1-h3! h4-h5 'iWg4-f4 J:!: h3-f3
~a5-a4
~d7-eB
f'
t
t , __ ,_
The most direct is to move the queen to g4. but the slower-paced plans 7.h4-h5 and 7.tbf3 - with or without a3 -a4 are also played.
The Poisoned Pawn Variation 7.
'ilVd1-g4
The most aggressive reply. Now Black usually sacrifices the g7 -pawn with 7 ... 'JlIic7 or 7 ... cxd4, which usually transposes. Alternatively, he can defend it with the solid 7 ... wfs or the provocative-looking 7 ... 0-0. A) weB-fB 7.... A solid alternative. The king is safer here than after kingside castling. However, the development problems of the hS-rook could become a factor. B. h2-h4 This move, with the idea of ~h3-g3, seems the best, even if the strange S. ~d2!? (to discourage .. :~Wa5) is interesting.
In true French fashion, White has a dangerous kingside initiative and Black has promising queenside play. Opening books claim a certain advantage for White, but in over-the-board play anything could happen. B) 0-0 7.... Black castles without fear of White's queen; the counterplay obtained by a w ell-timed ... f5 is sufficient to maintain a dynamic balance. Until a few years ago this so-called Warsaw Variation was viewed as a reasonable way to get off the beaten track and avoid a lot of theory. This is no longer the case; its recent popularity has made it topical, with the inevitable explosion of related theory. B.
i..f1-d3!
This is by now considered to be the best : delaying tiJf3 gives White the possibility to retreat his queen to d 1 in some variations, when Black is forced to weaken his position with ... g6 because of'iVh5. 207
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
f7-f5 S .... The safest. 8 ... 4:lbc6 is playable, but you need to have a good knowledge of the variations that follow. 9. ~h5! is a little crude but effective: 9 ... 4:lg6! (9 ... h6? has proved to be good for White: 1O.it.xh6! gxh6 11. "fIixh6) 10.4:lf3 'fIfc7 II.h4!? cxd4! I V;t>d I! and White has a dangerous initiative, even if not necessarily a winningone. 9. e5xf6 l:!:.f8xf6 10. it.c1-g5 10.'i¥hS h6!? Il.g4 4:lbc6! 12.g5 g6! 13.~xh6 Il:f7 14.it.xg6 Jlg7 15.it.d3 e5 with good counterplay for Black. 10. ... l:!f6-f7 10 ... 4:ld7 is interesting but the compensation for the exchange after 11. 'iYh4! appears doubtful. g7-g6 11. 'iWg4-h5 12. 'iWh5-d1!
Again this recurring theme: the queen returns to its home square. 12. ... 4:lbS-c6 13.4:lg1-f3 'iHdS-fS! 14.0-0 In theory, White has a small advantage thanks to his control of the dark squares, but in practice Black's kingside initiative means that both players have chances. 208
C) 7.... 'ildS-c7 This remains the most popular move in the Classical Winawer.
S. 'iVg4xg7 8.it.d3 is interesting. After 8 ... cxd4 (8 ... c4!? is playable and perhaps safer) 9.4:le2 dxc3 10.'i¥xg7 Il:g8 11.'iYxh7 4:lbc6 (1l...'i¥xe5!?) 12 .it.f4 it.d7 13 .0-0 0-0-0, we have another Poisoned Pawn type situation that is hard to assess. J:[hS-g8 S. 9. iVg7xh7 c5xd4
It should be remembered that Black's 7th and 9th moves can be played in reverse order. This key position is analogous to the more famous one from the Sicilian Najdorf, and is therefore called the Poisoned Pawn Variation of the
French Defence - Winawer Variation Winawer. How much pOison the pawn actually contains is the question that lies before us. The dual threat against eS and c3 allows Black to recover the pawn (I 0.cxd4?? would lose the aI-rook after 10 ...~ c3 + ), after which the strategic considerations are the same as those already discussed in the Armenian Variation with 'il'g4. White now has two possibilities to deal with Black's threats: C1)
10.
13.... 14. ~f4xe5 15. ~h7-h41 16. ~h4-d4 17. ~e5xd4
~c7-b6!
llg8xg5 1:[g5-g8 'iYb6xd4+
~e1-d1
Who is better om Black has a good mass of pawns in the centre, but it may not be a good idea to advance them, as they could become a target for White's two bishops. If this position is not Black's cup of tea, he might prefer the complications that ensue after 1 1... tLlxeS!? A rare line, but a very dangerous one where Black needs to know his stuff White protects himself against the queen fork on c3 and the queen check on eS in an unnatural way. In compensation, the knight can later develop to £3, where it is definitely more active than on e2. 10. ... tLl b8-c6 11. tLlg1-f3 d4xc3 Safer than the other capture Il ... tLlxeS lLiilf4 ~xc3 13. tLl xeS! ~xal+ 14 ..ltcl d3! lS. ~xf7+ >t>d8 16. ~f6! dxc2+, with a position that is difficult to weigh up. 12. tLlf3-g5 tLl c6xe5 13. ~c1-f4 13f4 f6! appears to be good for Black.
C2) 1 O. tLlg 1-e2 Defending c3 and, indirectly, eS. 10. ... tLlb8-c6! IjlO ... Wixe5? l1.cxd4, and White simply has an extra pawn. 11. f2-f4 1l.cxd4? tLlxd4! - again the theme of the queen check on c3. 11 .... ~ c8-d7 12. ~ h7-d3 Forcing Black to clarify the position in the centre and freeing the path for the h-pawn which is ready to march all the waytoh8! 12.... d4xc3 This position has been reached hundreds of times and it is still not clear 209
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
which of White's many alternatives is the best.
He can take on c3 with the queen or the knight, or he can move the cI-bishop to e3 or the rook to bI. Another alternative is to advance the h-pawn. White tries to organize his forces, which at the moment are not harmoniously placed. He hopes to make the most of the extra pawn that he will have, the two bishops, and the passed h -pawn. For his part, Black will castle queenside and seek to activate his pieces by placing one knight on fS and the other on c4 by way of as. Sometimes he will play .. .£7 -f6 to undermine White's centre and activate th e d7 -bishop, moving it to g6 via e8, and he often pushes ...dS -d4, to break open the white king's position . It is not possible here to examine all of the variations exhaustively. We will therefore present only one of the many p ossible lines, which is, however, indicative of the strategic and tactical complexity of the system. 13. tiJe2xc3!? a7-a6 To stop tiJbS . 14. lla1-b1 Always a useful move, and in this case it is particularly venomous. 210
tiJc6-a5! 14 .... After the mechanical 14...0-0-0?, there follows lS. 'VJHxa6!. 15. h2-h4 tiJe7-f5 Threatening I6 .. Jlg3 . 16. 1:rh1-h3 0-0-0 17. h4-h5 tiJa5-c4
with a position that is truly difficult to assess. In these situations, opening experts usually hedge their bets and make do with 'good possibilities for both players'.
Classical Winawer Positional Lines Now we will have a look at the positional lines in the Classical Winawer, where White does not seek to capture the g7-pawn, but instead is happy to emerge from the opening phase with his pieces harmoniously placed and, at the most, with some expansion on the kingside without decentralizing his queen. The first of the three variations that w e will examine is the least common : A)
7.
h2-h4
French Defence - Winawer Variation
Black's lead in development compensates for his structural weaknesses. B)
tilb8-c6 7. 8. h4-h5 '¥!fd8-a5 9. Sl.c1-d2 Sl.c8-d7!? Black is correct in continuing to develop without worrying about the weakening of the dark-square complex. Alternatively, 9 ... h6 10."iV g4 4:JfS 11. ~d3 tilce7 12.dxcS! gives White a freer game. 9 ... cxd4 10.cxd4 "iVa4 12.4:Jf3!? 4:Jxd4 is playable, even if by playing 13 .~d3 White achieves excellent compensation for the pawn. 10. h5-h6 At this point White must follow through with his idea, as after the banal developing move 10.4:Jf3 the move 10 ... h6! would be good, since "iV g4 is no longer playable. 10.... g7xh6! 0-0-0 11. tilg1-f3
7.
tilg1-f3
In view of the possible transpositions to line B, which we have just looked at, or to D, the final line, w e will now deal with the variations in which White does not play either h2-h4 or a3-a4. B1) ~c8-d7!? 7.... With the idea of ... ~a4. Here the fol lowing unaesthetic move is interesting: 8. d4xc51? Sl.d7-a4 9. l:ta1-b1
The active placement of White's pieces compensates for his bad pawn structure. 111
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 82) ~d8-a5 7.... is playable: ttJ bS-c6 S. il.c1-d2 9. .I1i.f1-e2 For 9.a4, see Variation D below. iLcS-d7 9. ... 10.0-0 c5-c4! Not 1O... 'il'a4? on account ofll. ~bl!, after which both 12.'fHxb7 and 12.~b5 are threatened.
11. ttJf3-g5!?
h7-h6 11. ... 12. ttJg5-h3 The manoeuvre ttJf3-g5-h3, to get to f4 and, if necessary, h5, is common in these variations. ttJe7-g6! 12 .... Now the position is approximately balanced. 83)
7....
The idea of exchanging the bad bishop with .. .~a6 is particularly good here. S. .l:i.f1-b5+ .l:i.cS-d7 9 . .l:i.b5-d3! With this manoeuvre White has prevented ... ~a6. 9. ... c5-c4 10. .i.d3-f1 In order to move the bishop to g2 or to h31ater on. 10.... ~d7-a4! Black obstructs the pawn on a3: for this reason the variation with ... b6, which is excellent here, is not as good after 7.a4, when the a4-square becomes inaccessible for Black. For this reason, many experts consider that 7.a4 is in fact the most accurate of White's solid alternatives. 11. h2-h4 h7-h6 12. h4-h5 w eS-d7! Black has brought his king to safety; and after 13. g2-g3
'C""
b7-b6
he obtains a satisfactory position with 13.... ~ d8-g8! The idea is to put the c2-pawn under pressure with ... 'fHh7. C) 212
7. a3-a4
French Defence - Winawer Variation
This move is not played so much to open the a3-f8 diagonal for the dark-squared bishop, which rarely happens, but more to prevent Black from occupying the a4-square with the bishop or the queen. It also assists a possible if.bS, which is often a useful move. 7. ttJbB-c6 S. ttJg1-f3 fidS-a5 9. if.c1-d2 White prefers to keep the queens on the board: the old 9.'iilVd2 is rarely played today, and does not cause problems for Black: 9 .. .~d7 10. ~a3 cxd4 11.cxd4 'iYxd2+ 12.'.t>xd2 ttJfs. 9. ... ~cB-d7 This is a tabiya position.
10. ~f1-b5 This move is in the spirit of the RUy Lopez and it has become more popular than the more natural 10 .if.e2 or 10 .~d3. White seeks to discourage
...f? -f6 and in some variations adds a drop of pOison to the threat of c4. The idea is that if Black plays 10 ... a6, White can take on c6 or, better still, retreat to e2, after which the weakness on b6 should become apparent. This is a subtlety, as something can only be considered a weakness if it can be exploited. 10. ... a7-a6 11. ~b5-e2 f7-16!? ~a5-c7 12. c3-c4 13.c4xd5 ttJe7xd5 14. c2-c4 ttJd5-e7 g7xf6 15. e5xf6 16. d4-d5!?
In this position, anything can happen. The weakness on b6, which is absent in the analogous variation with 10. ~e2, does not appear to be significant. If Black does not like the very open character of this line, he can choose to close the position with 10 ... c4!?, or protect himself against the c2-c4 advance with 10 .. .'t!Vc7. Alternatively, he can safely continue with 10 ...f6. All of these alternatives lead to acceptable games. This confirms that in most openings the number of playable moves is much greater than you might think. Some variations are much more popular than others simply because we tend to copy the moves played by champions. 213
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
.. Ragozin, Viacheslav .' Botvinnik,Mikhail • Moscow 1936 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 .tb4 4.a3 .bc3+ 5.bxc3 dxe4 6.'ii'g4 tbfG 7.'fIixg7 l:tgS S:~h6 c5 9.tbe2tbc6 . 10.£i.b2 ·jld7 11.l:!d1 l:!g6 12.'iYe3 'iraS 13.dxcS 0-0-0 14.tbg3 tbg4 1S.1i'xe4 ~xcS 16.l:1d2 'irb6 17.j.c1 f51S.'flfc4 ~b119.tbe2 ~b6 20.tbf4 ::99S 21.~d3 ~bS 22.'ii'b3 VJKc7 23.: e2 eS 24.tbe6 oItxe6 2S:~'xe6 e4 26.~bS tbceS 27.c4 tbxh2 " 0-1 2S.Ilxh2
.!:xd6 26.l:IeS Vif3 27.11xhS 'iVxh5 2S.J:reS+ ~h7 . 29.'iVxd3+ 'il'g6 30.'Wt'd1 l:te6 3UtaS l:leS 32.l::txa7. cS 33.l:!d7 . ~e6 34.'i!fd3+ g6: 35JldS d4 36.a4 l:te1+ 37.<;1;>g2 ~c6+ 3S.t3l:le3 39:~d1 ~e640.g4 , :t::e2+ 41.~h3 'ile3 42:iWh1 ' 'i¥f4 43.hSllf2 0-1 .~£
Alekhine,Alexander Nimzowitsro,Aaron
Bled 1931 (6) 1.e4 eS 2.d4 dS 3.tbc3 il.b4 4.tbe2: dxe4 S.a3 ~c3+ 6.tbxc3 fS?! 7.f3!. [7 ..¥t.c4 tDf6 S..tg5 0-0 9.'iWd2 tLlc6 , Steinitz,Wilhelm 10.0-0-0 ~h8 11.f3 t exf3 12.gxf3±" Winawer.Szymon . Maroczy-Seitz, Gyor 1924; 7 .i.f4!? tbf6. • Paris 1867 8.f3 (S.'iI'd2 0-0 9.0-0-0 tbhS 10.i.c4: 1.e4 e6 2.d4 dS 3.tbc3 .tb4 4.exdS . tbc6 11.f3! (l1.tLie2? tbe7 12.f3 tbxf4 exdS S.~d3 '~e6 6.tbf3 h6 7.0-0 . J3. tbxf4 tbd5+ Pilnik-Stahlberg, Mar" ~xc3 ; S.bxc3 tbd7 9.l:!b1 tbb6 .'; del Plata 1943) 1 I...exf3 (1 L.tb~f4? ·10.tbeS tjje711.f4 o'tf5 12..bfS tbxf5 12.'t!Yxf4 tbxd4 13.tbb5 e5 14.c3±) 13.~a3 ttJd6 14.fS tbe4 1S.f6 g6 12.gxf3 tbxf4' 13.'iIll'xf4· '@'d6 14."ttVe3 16.VJig4 'ircS 17.'ihg6 'i'e6 1S.'iI'g7 ~hS 15.f4;1;) S... O-O (S ... exf3 9.~xf3 · 0-0-0 19.1bxf7 tbxc3 20.tbxdS l:1xdS 'Wxd4? 10.tbb5+- ·Alekhlile) 9.fxe4 21.f7 tbd7 22 ..!:be1 tbe2+ ' 23.~h1 tbxe4 JO.tbxe4 fxe4 11.'iVd2 tbd7 cS 24.il.xcS 'i!t'e4 2S.f8'i1' i ·tbxfS 12.~e2 c5 Thomas-NirnZOwitsch/ 26.l:txfS tbg3+ 27.'tWxg3 l:lxfS Marienbad 1925] i ..:exf3 S:ifxf3 2S.il.xfS 1-0 ~xd4 [S ... 'i¥h4+ 9.g3 ,'i¥xd4 I 0.~f4! ., (IO.tbbS!? (Alekhine) 10 ...'WdS Capablanca,Jose Raul . (lo .. :illcS 1 1.~e3 "'ife7 12 ..tg5!) Alekhine,Alexander " 1 L~.f4 tba6 · 12.J::!.dl 'iIll'e7 13 .tbd6+! Bueno~' Aires Weh m 192 7 (I') cxd614.Axd6 'iIll'fl IS.ha6±) 10 ... c6' 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 ~b4 4.exdS 1 L'tIVh5+ g6 12.'iWe2 '\ikg713.0-0-0± exdS S.~d3tLlc6 6.tbe2tLlge7 7.0-0 (Lars~) 13 •.. tbf6 14.'Wd2 ~fl 15 ~.th6 ' ~fS ' S..bfS tLlxfS 9.1i'd3 'i¥d7 lIkg8 16.~c4 'iVeS: i 7.g4!±; '· S... tbf6 10.tLld1 0-0 11.tbe3 tLlxe3 12..be3 9 ..tf4 (9 ..ltg5) 9.:.0-0 ' 10.0-0-0 c6' llfeS 13.tbf4 ~d6 14J:tfe1 tbb4 11.h3 tbd5 12.tbxd5 'iiixd5 13.1i'c3!±' 1S:iYb3 'iWfS 16.l:lac1 tbxc217J:txc2 Matokhin-Birnov, USSR 1949] 9.~g3! 'YWxf4 . 1S.g3 'it'fS " 19.1:tce2 b6 [9 ..lte3!? 'iWg4 10.iff2 tLif6 II.h3 'Wg6 20.'iWbS hS 21.M l:te4 22.il.d2 :xd4 12.0-0-0 0-0 13 ..ltc4 tbc6 , 14-.g4 23.~c3 l:ld3 24.~eS ndS 25.il.xd6 Chalabi-Mashian, .. Munich 01 1955; 214
French Defence - Winawer Variation
~9 .tbbS!? 'i!fh4~ lO:g3 'i!fe7 c" 1 '1 ~'iV~3! \tba6 (11. .. c6 12 ..§l.f4) 12.M4 tbf6 13.~g2 0-0 14.0-0-0 tbe8 IS.~he1 'Tilevic-Ra1:linovich, Sverdlovsk 1957] ,9...tbfSI? 10:iixg7 'ife5+? ·· [::::: \ 1o... ~g8i] 11.i..e2 %%g8 12:it'hS ilgS ' 13,'ifh4± ';j ~d7?1 [13 ... l'Jxg2? ;J 4.i..f4+-Alekhine;'- 13.'.. .ttg4!? 14.'iYf2 tbc6 15.0-0 l:rg7 Kmoch} ; 14.~g51" £t.cS? [l4... tbc6] '15.0-0-0+':' .b g2 · 1S..l:the1 .te4 i 17.~h5 tbxh51S.!tdS+ ~f7 ; 19.1txh5 [I9 ...c;t>g7 20.tbxe4 fxe4 21..§l.h6++-] . " 1-0
,. 13.'~b1
[13.'iixaSl?] 13..:ibd2 . 14.J:[xd2 fSI=1= 15.gxfS [IS,f4? fxeS] 15...gxfS1S.i..h3 [seeking salvation in a tactical skirmish] 1S...fxe5 17.tbc7 .!:tbS 1S.tbxeS %XfS 19.tbc7 .bh3 20.tbxh3 lbf3 2U~dd1 exd4 22.tbxd5 1:I.f5 23.tbdf4 UbfS 24.tbd3 tt:Jce5 25.tbxe5 llxe5 2S.tbg1!? tbg5! 27.h4 tbeS 2S.l'.Ih2 J:Ie4?! 29.f31lle3 30.l::te21 l'Jf4 3Ube3 dxe3 ·32,l'.Id3 trxh4 33Jlxe3 tbd4 ~.l:{e4 l:txe4 [34...ltJxf3? 3S. l::te8+_ wfl 36.tbxf3 l'.'th1 + 37.Ilel!+-] 3S.fxe4 Wf7 3S.'iitc1 ~S 37.~d2 t ,',. .' ~eSI 3S.'~e3 hS 39.a3 [39.tbh3!?] Steiner,Lajos . . ~" 39 ...aS 40.tbh3 tbc2+.. [40 ... tbe6] 41.wd3 [41.~d2tbd4 42.We3 tbe6] Nimzowitsch,Aaron '~" '. Berlin 1~2 8 (10) 41 ..:tbe1+ 42.We2 tZlg2 43.c;t>t3 l1.e4 eS 2.d4 dS 3.tbc3 i..b4 4.eS c5 tbh4+ 44.~e3 0.gS 4S.tbgS<M6 S..td2 ltJe7 6.a3 .bc3 7.bxc3 c4 4S.tbh7+ ~g7 47.tbgS ~S . S.h4 hS 9.~e2 tbfS 10.g3 gS 11 ..i.g'S 4S.tZlh7+ ~e7! 49.tbgS [49.'~(d4 ,'\WaS ' 12:iWd2 GbcS 13.£dS : gS tZlf8! SO.tbgS tZle6+!-+] 49 ...lbeS ~14.tbh3 ~d71S.tbgS ltJhS 1S.f3 9iic7 50.~d4 ~d6 S1.tbh3 a4 S2.tZlf4 h4 ·17.g4 J:IeS 1S.~g7 tLlgS 19.9xh5 S3.tZlh3 bSI S4.tbf4 bS SS.Gbh3 gxhS 20.f4 tbce7 21 ..bh5 tbfS tbcS+ S6.'iite3 Wc5 57.'iitd3 b41 SS.axb4+ xb4 S9.W·c 2 Gbd4+ 22 ...txf7 tbxg7 23 ..beS tbxe8 ' 24.tbf7tbgfS 2S.exfS tbxf62S.tbg5 SO.b1 tZleS! S1.<;.1;>a2 [61.Wc2 Wt4 tbh5 27:iYe3 il.d7 2S.'iVeS+ <;tJbS 62.ttJf2 tZlgSl-+ Reinfeld] SLwc4 S2.'iita3 'iitd4! S3.wxa4 Wxe4 ' S4.b4 29.'ffdS+ i..c6 30.Wd2 as 31.lDxeS ;'iita7 32J1ag1 l:LeS 33.Ilg6 J:tc8 wf3 6S.bS Wg21[it is mate. in 19 34.l:thg1 'iIl'b5 3S.'i!fb4 J:lhS moves according ; to the six piece . 3S.~xb5 axbS 37.tS lith7 38.f6 .§LeS tablebases] 0-1 39,tZlgS J:Ic7 40.IlhS ,. 1-0 .,
Lasker,Emanuel Nimzowitsch,Aaron Zurich 1934 (10)
·1.e4 e6 2,d4 d5 3.lDc3 ~b4 4.e5 c5 '5 ..§l.d2 tbe7 ' 6.lDb5 .§l.xd2+ 7:iWxd2 '0-0 'S.c3 lDf5 9.g4?1 [9 ..td3!] 9 ...tbh4!=1= (Keres) 10.g5 cxd4 11.cxd4 . ltJcS "J2.0-0-0 . .'t\Ya5!=1=..
'W
Fischer,Robert Tal,Mikhail Leipzig 011960 (5)
. . 1.e4 eS 2.d4 d5 3.tbc3 il.b4 4.eS c5 S.a3 it.a5 6.b4 cxd4 7:,*'g4 ltJe7 S.bxaS dxc3 9,'i!Vxg7 l:t98 10:ili'xh7 tbbcS ,.11.tbf3 'Wic7 12 ..tbS i..d7 13.0-00-0-0 14.i..gS tbxe5 1S.tbxeS . i.xbS J 6.tbxf7 £i.xf1 . 17.tbxdS llxg5 215
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
,18.ti)~;6 'ii~g2+ '" '19:;h1 ~;~b5 '~"'< 19:je2lb;;S 20.i;;511i;3-21 :i~2 20.J:xf1 ~xe6 21.'it>xg2 'i¥g4+V2~1h " 1li'xe5 22ie3 lbf5 .: 23.'i!t'f3 ' l:xd1+~ , ; · " · ' , · 24.Uxd1 ' lbd4 25~xd4 ,::~ exd4~ :; Naiditsch,Arka~y , ". 26.'ii'd3 J:tdS ' 27.g3 1Ves 2S:'4 "'b4' YUSUp?V,Artur ';," ,: ",' 29::81 a5 "30.h4 h5 3U[b11Wxa~. : Germany Bundesliga 2006/07(~) " . 32.%tbS 96 '33.\tig2'i1¥~2+ 34.\pf3 a4 :1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.lbe3 ~b4 A.e5 ' 35.flb6 wg7 36.J:b1.t>gS 37.J:b6 ~ :lbe7 5.a3 bc3+ 6.bxe3 c5 7.'ikg4 ~:·,. 1li'a1 ··3S.we2 , s3 ;, 39.l%a6 1li'b2+; 10-0 S:~d3lllbc6 9.1Wh5lbg610.ltJf3 . ,;'40.1Vd2 d3+\'.<, ," .0 ~1 : ~ 'jfe7 11.~e3 , tiJee7 , 12.h4 jid7 s;" ",.,:"' , ';:". : ", ,:' '; ~ 13.'ilg4 ~514.iVh3. h615.h5 tt)h8> <;·,Pogrebissky.Iosif '" . ':':.6, J6.g4 c4 17..te2 fXg4 18.'ifxg4 lbfS " , ..Botvinnik,Mikhail , " :"'~ t19.Wd2. b520.lbh4 :lbxe3 , 21,Jxe3 ':. ? knh1gr~dch-URS 1?i9 '(ii) ;" ""q,,:':. '~, ~ :lbf7 22.0f3 '; It:ldS ·23 ..i1hg1 ~e8 ' 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.t;)e3 i b44.e5 (;5 , .24.lbh4 a5 2S.~f3 JIbS 26.e4 dxe4 c." 5.a3 , ..\ixc3+ 6.bxc3 ~ lbe7j.tbf3, :27.he4 b4 , 2S.axb4axb4 29J~af1 . ':: lbbe6 8.~d3 'lWa59....d2 c410.i.e2 ' l%xf1 . 30.rlxf1 . b3 '·31.cxb3 ," exb3 ,~". Jifa4 '11.0~0 fII.M;·}LtDgS}11~:~d7, ?32.~d3 l%Ce 33.c4 'iWb7 34;we3 b2 i' 12.095 h613.lbh3 . 0-0-0 14.f4 f6 '35.lbg6 £f.f7 . 36....e4 l%bS . 37:d5 '" 1S.ltJf2 h5 '16.lLld1 tlIf51VDb2 'iraS' ;'ilfa7+ 3s.wei b1 'iW 39.Jlxb1 ' ifa2+ , :', 18.84 gSI+= [Finel19.lLld1 94 20:exf6 . ,40.wf1 ·· ""':..''''~ Xtdf821.1ta3 .rlxf6 22:~b4 "'lbxb4: ,. 23.ex~ "'b~24.e3 'iIIe7 ,25.lbb2~ ~. Nijboer.Friso " J:thfS ,. 26.1td1 {j;;e7,'; 27.g3 ' llh8 V Timman,Jan ,,' ..,' .' '{ . :;" 28..ic2 ' h4 <29.Wg'2 'ttlfS ' 30.£iicrs ~, Hilyersumch-NID'2Q'06(S) ": .',.:\,;;:/ J:txf531.'ilVe2 ." XtfhS , 32:l%h1 ' e5 ' ,1.e4e6 2.d4 d5 3.tDe3 ~b4 4.e5c5 ';"., .33.dxt,S .l¥.f534.l%ag1hxg3 35.Wf1 :'S.a3 ~e3+6.bxe3 0e77.'irg4 \tc7 ". llxh236:~xti2J:txh2 f.:<:'. .." O-{l '8Ji'xg7l:rg8 ' 9.lWxh7 cxd4 : 10.llle2 :. .'<~ llbbc6 , 11.f4 ::; ~d7 .; 1i:tlt'd3 , dxe3 :,'; { Rabino~ich.Ilya<~.' , " '~~ ;13.tbxe3 a6 14JXb1 .!:tea ,1S.h4 lbf5 ~ Botvinnik.Mikhail ·' . <1 6.Xth3 ' ttlcd4 17.h5'Wc5 ,18.Xtxb7 ' ' Leclngradcli-Ull.Si939(4) '<:,,.'J}~ ilbb519.tDe4 " , " ,e4 e6 2.d4d5 3.~e3il.b4 4.e5c5; ;~. . ,~,.. I'; '; ~.~"."} :Of', ,_ :'~~. 5. a3i-,~xc3+ 6.bxe3 tiJe7 7.t£if3 Jt.dr: , Sokolov,ADdrey .,;:-' 8.a4 'il'aS 9.'illd2 ltJbc6 ,10.~d3 (4) , YusupoV:Artur. . . " ., ":; 11.~e2 f612.~a3 0-0-O' 13.0-0l2:ifS' ', ruga ill 19~6 (3) ' ,' , ··"", ·.14,g41 [l4.l:rfl)I!? hSl S.h4;·' 14Jife!J' :1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.lbe3 .tb4 4.e5 c5 ,,';: 14.~lbfe71S.J:(fb1'iWa6? , >16.a5±; i5.a3 Axe3+ 6.bxe3 lbe7 7.lbf3 b6 .... ndfS17.lbe1 fxeS ' 1S.llld3i±"'cxda" :S.a4 .ta6 9.ha6 lllxa6 10.0-0 tbbS ' ,:', 19.i.xd3 \''iWxa5 20.~~e7 · '1ifd ~11.dxc5 bxc5 12.c4 0-0 13.exdS <·''''21 ..bts .!:txfS 22.~b5 %tf423.h3 a6 lbxd514.'iWd3 h615.c4llle716.1!i'e4 .·" 24.£f.x~6 <.be6 , 25.;re1 " ~ 26:J:te3' lbd7 .17.l:Ib1 , 1!i'a5 ... 18.J:td1 ,,, ltad8 .... , Ab5 ,,, 27.:g3 ,; gS " 28.c,t.g2 .,, 'ili'f7,
t
i
1-0 : <:
1:0 .1
216
French Defence - Winawer Variation
:29.~~3 :'~f6 ' 30J%e1 .i.eS 31.'iWe2 ··':~;"h7~25.f4i"'ia51? :26~iWbfi'[26:~~aS ;<;tbS ' 32.lIb1 ~b5 33.'ife3 .li.eS :lxa527 ..L3]2S•.tLic6 27.'tWeS l:te7, :34.'ife2 <:J;;c7 35.r.th1 ..agS 3S.r.te12a'flgS+?! [28.'iWffi!?fi'ds 29,'ii'xd8. ;..aeS ' 37JIh1 ,.h5 :: 38.~g1 v".~.b5 0,xdS ,, 30.gS<=' Botvinnikl 28...~S :.39.'iWe1 h4 4O.l:te.3 iJ..c4 41.llh2 ~.S . ,,~ 29,*,a3 ·[29.gS!?lbxd4!? 30.gxh6 e5]' .42.'ifa1'i!ffS ~43.ltg2 a5 ., 44.'iVa4 c 29_e5?! i' [29.~J!fc7!30.lthfl , 0,b4! l'ife7 i' 45.'iWa1 wb7 .4UWa4 J:tf8 (30...lbeS ? 3Lfxe5 Ji.e832.WS+ h1 J:tf652.Wg1 ,,: t30.dxeS - Botvinnik; 30.he7 ttlxe7] ;WbS . 53.l:th2 ,: llf! ' 54.ltg2.' 1%13 ' 30.)iJxd41.[30 ...0,xi6 31.'iVxa6 'if~6 '55.
.. ~e8 39...tc6+ i;t>e7 40Jtx~ 'Wxg4+:
.. ". .
"
::." Smyslov.VasilY ,J·' , . Botvinnik:Mikhail
~: Moscow ch~URS 1944-:(8) . . .
;.' :'
":'~"'" "!;
,~!, ~.;"
.' ,;", """
.' ..,' :.'. 0-1 i
;isChe~.Robert
:J.e4 eS 2.d:4 d5 ~.lbc3. ~:4.e5 c5 . tarsen.Bent ( . ,L i .( 5.a3 'hc3+ S~bxC3 0,e7 7.a4 0,ix;6 Denverm1971(1) ' , " .' '! 'albf3 'fi'a5 9~d2 c4 10.lbg5 [10.h4'... :' 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.0,c3 Ab4 4.e5 :(Stciner): 10':g3\] Hl.:.hS ·11.tt;lh3 0,9S ·,,~.. ·:Ci:Je7 5.a3 ii.xc3+ . S.bxc3 c5 7084' ~ 12.ti'f3?1 . [12.f4 ..ad7 · 13.g4 ·, (Fi~e); - ' tbbc6 B.tiJf3 ~d7 9.~d3 'WIc7 10:0-0', nAe2 ··'il.d7 ' 13;il.h5;t] " 12_~7 . _C4 11 ..te2 f6 12.lte10,g6 13.ii.a3 :13:tiJf4 lbxf4 .: 14J~·xf40,e7!15.h4 fxe5 14.dxe5 0,cxe5 15.lLlxe5 0,xe5~ ~ha41:j: 1S.h5 (16.~e2 ' ~S 17...adl) ', 1S.'lWd4 ' lZlgS .' 17.kh5 ' ~f7 ·18.f4 ~ 1S.~'fi'b5!+ ,: 17.wd1 " [17.nel] ! lIhe819.f5 exf5 20.'1ifxdS+ >tiS . \7_trc81~ 1SJi.C1 [18 ..te2 tc6 19.94? ..." 21.~f3 , lbe5 '22:i!t'd4 wgS 23.l:txe5: :hc2t o. 20.Wx~2 ,. 'tIfb3+ " 2L,WcJ ' 'ifxe5 . 24:ii'xd7 l:tadB 25.'ilkxb7 rlb6-+] 18.:.rlCS ' 19ie2 I. [19.g4!?J'ife3+ 2S:Ji>f1 Ud2 27.~cS+ J:teS . ; .., . ' . 19.~l:taS20.wd2 0-0 [a questionable .. 2S..tc5 - 1:rf2+ : 29.Wg1 -.l:txg2+ 'mC;~_ . Whlte' now .developsa ~trongini. . 30.wxg2 . 'ifd2+ : 31.wh1 . .l:txc6 'tiative on the kingside;~ 20:~.'iYd7 21.g4 .. 32..lUc6 " 'ii'xc3 ,; 33.l::tg1+ . Wf6 t..ab5] 21.94! [21..L3?..\hc2! n1Lxe'i ' ,3:4JUa7 ~g5 35.~bS ti'xc2 ~S.a5 1i'b2!Botvinnik121_f6! 22.exfS lXxfS Wb2 '37.AdS+WeS 38.aS'fWa3 23.'ilkc7 ti3. ...e3] 23_l:!.f724:ii'd8+· 39.~b71Wc540.J:tb1c341.AbS 1-0 ... , ......... .... ...... ... 0,
,
~,,, .. ~"
•.'_. _ ''''.
~¥..
:.
~"."".~ .
'
........'<~ • • ~
• •~!
'..r.~", ".":'.~
,~
~
~
~
,>".~.;.,
'_;'
,,} ,4~'
-"
.~~
~
217
Chess Open inn Essentials - Volume I
Sicilian Defence 1.c2-e4 c7-c5
.
~
..
In the Sicilian Defence, Black advances his pawn to c5 so as to make it as difficult as possible for White to achieve the ideal pawn centre, which consists of pawns on e4 and d4. Until the end of the I 920s, Black almost always preferred to directly occupy the centre with the classical move I ... e5. However, the Sicilian Defence has a big advantage over this move: usually White responds to ... c5 by advancing his pawn to d4 and then recaptures with the knight (the Open Sicilian). This gives Black the advantage of a central pawn majority; an e-pawn and d-pawn against the single white e-pawn. This structure has strategic characteristics that are more complex than those of the Open Garnes, and Black can end up with a variety of very different pawn fomlalions. White, for his part, can castle kingside or queenside. He can play strategically. or he can violently attack the black king by making use of his space advantage and better piece development, and the increased mobility granted by these factors. 218
White directs his forces to the kingside, and Black seeks an initiative on the queenside, exploiting the semi-open c-fiIe. There are, of course, the inevitable exceptions: a striking example is the Sveshnikov Variation, in which Black develops a strong kingside initiative against the white king! This complexity is well suited to the taste of modern players, who like to be able to determine the strategy of their own game, and not have it determined too much by the strategic intentions of their opponent, even if this relative autonomy entails greater risks. The Sicilian was virtually never played in the 19th century: it enjoyed a boom in the second half of the 20th century, and it is as vital and popular as ever at the beginning of the new millennium. Kasparov, whom many consider to be the strongest player of all time, played it almost exclusively, and his contributions, especially in the NajdorfVariation, have led to the creation of a very large body of theory. However, we are still far from plumbing the depths of this defence.
Minor Variations 2.tbf3 and 3.M leads to the Open Sicilian. However, there are quite a few players who, for one reason or another, prefer one of the following minor variations. These variations may not be quite as sharp as the main lines, but they should not be underestimated by Black. In particular, the Sicilian with 2.c3 otherwise known as the Alapin Variation - has become so popular lately that it is only because of convention that it is still classified as a minor system.
Sicilian Defence
Wing Gambit 1. e2-e4 2. b2-b4
c7-cS
The Wing Gambit has never been popular with elite players, and for the few who do use it at this level it is only brought out as a surprise weapon. White plays 2.b4 with the intention of giving up a pawn, in order to construct a strong pawn centre with 3.d4; or he will activate his pieces with 3.a3. Against correct play, White does not seem to gain sufficient compensation for the pawn. However, in practice it is not easy for Black to defend his position.
Morra Gambit Here is another gambit for adventure lovers, even if it is more positional by nature than most of the other gambits: 1. e2-e4 c7-cS 2. d2-d4 cSxd4 3. c2-c3 d4xc3 4. tLlb1 xc3 White gives up a pawn for development, and above all to make the c- and d-files available for occupation by his rooks. Black, denied his usual active play on the queenside, has to operate in a cramped and passive pOSition for many moves.
White usually develops his pieces very aggressively (usually: tLlf3, ttJc3, ~f4, ~c4, ~e2, .l:lfdl, l:!.acl) and Black must defend with precision. Black usually establishes a Scheveningen set-up (e6, d6, a6, ttJf6, ttJc6, ~e7, ~d7, 'iVc7 or 'iVb8) and normally delays kingside castling. A modern treatment of the Morra Gambit by Black involves advancing the pawn to e5: a drastic measure to prevent e4-e5 (which in many continuations causes Black serious problems). More rarely Black fianchettoes on the kingside in the style of the Dragon Variation. The Siberian Variation has become a very fashionable choice recently: tLlbB-c6 4. e7-e6 S. tLlg1-f3 6. ~f1-c4 'iVdB-c7 tLlgB-f6 7. 'tilfd1-e2 tLlf6-g4 B. 0-0
219
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
with the venomous idea of responding to 9.h3?? with 9... tt:ld4 and Black wins the queen. ~c7-b8 9. tt:lc3-b5 h7-h5! 10. h2-h3 a7-a6! 11. g2-g3 ~f8-c5 12. tt:lb5-c3 tt:lg4-e5 13. ~c1-f4 White does not have sufficient compensation for the pawn. The Morra Gambit is very popular at amateur level, but is viewed with suspicion by grandmasters. In view of this reservation, it is surprising how often these elite players decline the gambit and prefer to continue with 3... tt:lf6, transposing to positions from the Alapin Variation. Other ways of declining the Morra are 3 ... d5 or 3... d3. In conclusion, Black's extra pawn should count in the long term: at least in theory. However, as it happens, in the ensuing endgames the extra pawn is not always enough to guarantee a win.
2.f4 Variation 1. e2-e4 2. f2-f4
c7-c5
seek to break up White's aligned pawns in the centre with .. .e6 and ... d5 . Or he can immediately play 2...d5 to produce a kind ofimproved Scandinavian: d7-d5 2. ... 3. e4xd5 ~d8xd5 3 ... tt:lf6!? is an interesting gambit ~d5-d8 4. tLlb1-c3 Black's c5-pawn is without doubt more useful than White's f4-pawn. For this reason White usually postpones f4 until the third move, first preventing 2...d5 with 2.tt:lc3 ~'.~
Mariotti,Sergio ?";:;'" ''',
". KuZniin.Genitady
,~;,,, Leningrad 1977 (IS) ~.r;.
' :"
"~;
';-.
'}
; 1.e4 c5 2.b4 cxb4,3.d4 dS '4.eS tt:leS l ; S.a3 'iWb6 S.lL\e2 .itfS 7.axb4 lLlxb4 i· S.tLla3 :e8 9.tt:lf4.bC210.•g4 eS ; ; 11.AbS+ :' ~c6 ' '12.lLlxd5 '''' 'ifd8 ; :;13:lLlxc2 'i!fxd5 14.11b1 hS 1S.'ifh3 ~ i'ife4+ 1S.'itd1 :iVg4+. 17.1hg4 hxg4 : ~ 18..b4 . .tlc7 .. )9.i.xc6+'" nxc6 ! t20.11~b7 :~~7 21 .ltxaf:teS 22J:la4 l ~tCid5 23..td2 J:l:bS 24.lt>e2 , ..!te 7 ; \ 25.g3 O~O 2S:tLle3 . 11b2 27.tCixdS : ~exd5 " 28.:td1 l'1eS ' 29.wf1 : J:cc2 1 r 30:~e1 .igS 31.lta5~h7 32.Jlxd5 : ~lt>gS , 33.J:td6+ '~f5 ". 34.tl:d7 Wg6 \ ;35.d5.ie3 3S.tl:dS+~h7 37.fxe3 ; iJ:txh2 3S.lfd211bxd2 39.i.xd2 11Xd2 ! f40:e4 lld3 ' 41.<~f2 ) 11f3+ 42.Wg2 ; : , ' ," i fl':[d3 43.e6 fxe6 44.11xeS wgS 45.d6 ! 4S.ne7+ ' ,lt>f6 ' 47.e5+ ..: '~!5 'j :4S.~2'it>e449.d7 1-0 :
;<M7
'. ~,"
MeSsa.Roben:o f Keogh.Eamon' .... This attack achieved a certain popularity in the 1970s thanks to the efforts of Bent Larsen and Tony Miles. Black can 220
,,~~
. '. ~
.,5
.'
~ .1.e4 e5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.tt:lxc3 i 'dS 5.~e4 tCicS 6.lLlf3 e6 7.0-0 Jie7 ,
•. ' Berlin tt 1980 . ';-.
...
.
Si cilian Defen ce .....
"
S:ife2 a6 , 9.ttd1 'itc7 10...tf4 lbf6 '- 1U[ac1 0-0 ", 12 ~b3 trdS 13.lbd5 ', exd5 14.exd5 ' 'il'd7 ,1S.dxc6 bxc6 '16.lbeS "*,b7 17.lbxf7 dS 1S~lbxdS ,.txdS 19.i.a4 ~g4 20~xc6 ~xc6 2Ui'xg4 'tikeS 22.1Wf3 ~b6 23.~e3 , .be3 . 24.'fixe3 "1lfd7 25.h3 n es ' : 26."ifb6 l:le6 27;ri/ic7 "*,xc7 2S.ttxc7 T 1-0 ''-:
.;~
Fischer,Robert 3< Kortchnoi,Viktor "
Buenos Aires 1960 (14)
1.e4 cS2.lbf3 a6 3.d4 cxd4 "4.c3 : dxc3 5.lbxc3 lbc6 ' 6 ..1c4 d6 7.0-0 :lbf6 S..Yl.gS e6 9.'iYe2 Jie7 10.l:t.fd1 'fic7 1Ulac1 0-0 12.J.b3 h6 13.it.f4 e5 14.~e3 'WdS 1S.lbdS lbxd5 16.h d5 ~d7 17.lb d2 lbb4 1S..lib3 '~gS 19.~xg5 ,'itxgS 20.lbf3 ..Yl.g4 " ' 21.:tc7 " dS 22J bb7 J:tbS 23.J:l:xbS ''it'xbS 24.h3 .bf3 2S.'i!fxf3 lbc6 26:ti'd3 lbd4 27.~c4 a5 2S.b3 1i'b4 29.f4 Wh7 . 1h- 1h , ~~
.
"., Fischer,Robert Naranja,Renat() Meralco 1967
.
;.1.e4 cS 2.lbc3 lbc6 ' 3.lbge2 e5 ' 4.lbdS lbf6 5.lbec3 Jie7 6.~c4 0-0 7.d3 h6 S.f4 d6 9.f5 b6 10.h4 ~b7 ,11.a3 J:cS 12.lbxf6+ .b f6 13.'it'h5 ,lbe7 14...Yl.g5 d5 . 15•.b f6 ' dxc4 '16.'ti'g4 96 17.dxc4 'ti'd6 1S•.b e7 ~xe7 19.fxg6 fxg6 20:~bg6+ \lI'g7 21:Wxg7+ Wxg7 22.lid1 llcdS 23.!ixdS J:XxdS 24.lbd5 bS 2S.cxbS
.'
"':;:"
~<
.... ~ ,",
~.
h d5 26.exdSc4 27.a4 J:!.xdS 2S:;f;1e2 :td4 29•.l:td1 tte4+ 30.'M3 1'.If4+ 31.We3c3 32.b3 1-0 f
, . Antoms,Guntars McShane,Luke
.~
,
Leon Ech-tt 2001 (1) '
1.e4 c5 2.tbc3 tbc6 3.14 g6 4.lbf3 ~g7 5...Yl.c4e6 6.fS lbge7 7.fxe6 dxe6S.0-0 tbd4 9.d3 lbec6110.~g5 tbxf3+ 1UWxf3 .id4+ 12.~e3 ' h e3+' 13.'tifxe3 'iYd4 14:fixd4 cxd4 1S.tbb5 We7 .16 ..l:tae1 ·· ~d7. 17.tbc7?! .:tacS1S.lbdS+ , ~d6' 19.tbf6 .lbe5! 20.c3 dxc3 21.bxc3 ~a4!?t 22.~b3? .ixb3 23.axb3 tbxd3 24.l:ld1 .uxc3-+ 25.trf3 We7 26.tbg4 lIdS 27.tbf2? tbxf2 2S.ltxdS J:txf3 ". 0-1
Kovalev,Andrey , Kovalevskaya.Ekaterina , Moscow 2002 ( I)
1.e4 c5 2.lb<:3 tbc6 3.f4 g6 4.tbf3 .ig7, 5.~c4 e6 6.0-0 tbge7 7.e5 d5 S.exd6 'ifxd6 9.tbe4 'fic710.d3 0-0 11:~'e1 lbfS 12.g4 tbfd4 13.tbfgS h6 14.c3 bS 1S.cxd4 bxc4 16.f5 exfS 17.g f4 'iHdS 1S.gxf5 .b fS 19.d5 tbd4 20.dxc4 hxg5 : 21.ti:lxg5 f6 22.tbe6 ..Yl.xe6 23.dxe6 lIeS 24.'fVe4 f5 ' 2S:ti' g2 11xe6 26.1:rae1 ·'MfeS 27.tIxe6 CZlxe6 2S..l:te1 .l:tdS 29.b4 'fif7, 30.~e3 cxb4 31.c5 i.d4 32 ..b d4 J:txd4 33:~'aS+ ~g7 34.c6 lbg5 35.'uc1 'lWd5 36.'iVxa7+ ~h6 "" 0-1
221
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Sicilian Defence Alapin Variation 1.c4 c5 2.c3
if he wants to, and continue with ... d6 , ... 0,f6, ... g6, ... ~g 7 and ... 0-0. But this allows White to maintain a slight advantage. Here is a more detailed look at these five approaches that Black can use against the Alapin Variation.
This variation deserves special attention because of its noteworthy current popularity. In a certain sense, 2.c3 is the m ost logical way to proceed; White seeks to create the ideal pawn centre, i.e. pawns on the d4- and e4-squares. White wants to play 3 .d4 : if then 3 ... cxd4, h e recaptures with the c3-pawn. The move 2.c3 also has its disadvantages : it is no t a developing move, as is the n ormal 2.0,f3 ; but the main problem is that it denies the b I-knight the possibility to develop to its natural destination, th e c3-square. This is not an esoteric point, as it allows Black effective counterplay against the undefended e4-pawn , with the opportunity to reach improved versions of the Alekhine (2 ... 0,f6), the Scandinavian (L.dS) , or the French (L.e6 and 3 ... d S). However, Black can also ignore his adversary's ' threat' to conquer the centre 222
A) d7-d5 2 .... Aiming to exploit the fact that White, having already occupied the c3-square, will not be able to attack the black queen on dS . This variation o ften leads to position s with an isolated d4-pawn, with the usual strategic considerations for both colours th at this entails. Here Black can very actively play ... ~g4, with or without ... 0,f6; or oth erwise, continue more m odestly with ... e7-e6, leaving the c8-bishop on its home square. 3. e4xd5 ~d8xd5 4. d2-d4
Black can now choose between two equally valid moves: ttJb8-c6 4 .... 5. 0,g1-f3 ~c8-g4 Putting maximum pressure on d4.
A1)
6. ~f1-e2
c5xd4
Sicilian Defence - Alapin Variation e7-e6 7. c3xd4 and Black has fair prospects.
A2)
ttJgS-f6 4. 5. ttJ g1-f3 and Black has a variety of replies: S...tiJc6, S .. .~g4 and the prudent S... e6 . The resulting position s are typical isolated queen's pawn structures: White has an initiative which can become unpleasant for Black in the middle game, and he has good piece activity, which can often threaten the black king. On the other hand, if Black patiently plays through to the endgame, the weakness of the isolated d4-pawn could prove to be in his favour.
many Alekhine variations, now takes one extra tempo. 3. e4-e5 ttJf6-d5 4. d2-d4 c5xd4 Now White can recapture on d4 with the pawn or the queen . In the latter case, after S:iVxd4 e6 6. ttJf3 ltJc6 7.'iV e4 (best), Black should be able to obtain balanced play with either the logical 7 ... d6 or the courageous 7 .. .fS. Alternatively, h e can postpone the capture with the flexible 5. ttJ g1-f3
B) ttJ gS-f6 2 .... The second m ethod is certainly more active, and for this reason also riskier. It consists of a direct counterattack against e4.
not immediately revealing his intentions. Black can respond to S.ltJf3 in three ways: S... d 6, which is interesting but largely untried; S.. .e6, which appears to be passive, but is very solid; and ttJ bS-c6 5 .... which is the most common, and to which White has two alternative responses: Here Black, in a way similar to the Alekhine Defence, seeks to encourage White to advance his pawn to eS, believing that h e will then be able to effectively counterattack the centre with ... d7-d6. On the other hand, the c2-c4 pawn advance, which is so common in
B1)
6. c3xd4 d7-d6 7. ~f1-c4 The most incisive; 7.ltJc3 is also interesting. ttJd5-b6 7.
S. ~c4-b5 223
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I Stronger than 8. ~b3, which does not cause Black any problems. 8 ..., d6xeS! The only move that allows Black to reach a balanced game. 82) 6. ~f1-c4 White's modern continuation, which is sharper and more complicated. 6. ~dS-b6 7. ~ c4-b3 d7-d6 8. eSxd6 'iVd8xd6 9. 0-0
The c3-pawn, and possibly the b2-pawn, is in effect sacrificed to exploit the lead in development and White's highly dynamic piece placement. However, Black should be able to equalize if he knows his theory and defends carefully. C) 2 .... e7-e6 This third line is perhaps the most solid of all. 3. d2-d4 d7-dS The idea behind this line is to deploy the pawns along the lines of the French Defence. If White now plays e4-e5 we have effectively transposed to the Advance Variation of the French. 4. e4xdS e6xdS 224
A typical position arising from the 3 ... c5 line of the Tarrasch Variation of the French, but in this case White already has his pawn on c3, which makes it easier for Black to equalize. However, the position is a little dry and gives Black few opportunities to win. D) d7-d6 2 .... Black's fourth approach is to ignore his adversary's 'threat' to conquer the centre. However, this allows White much freer play. For example, ~g8-f6 3. d2-d4 4. ~f1-d3! cSxd4 g7-g6 S. c3xd4 6. ~ b1-c3 and after 6 ...~ g7, if White plays the correct move 7 .h3! before he develops his king's knight
Black will not easily reach a satisfactory position. It is important to prevent the
Sicilian Defence - Alapin Variation
J:l.dS 2S.il.hS J:[xeS 27.lLxf7+ wg7 ' 2SJ:td3 J:IgS 29.g3 l:rdS 30J:txdS .bdS 31.il.eS as 32.l:lf7+ ~gS 33.~ .tcS 34J~e7 eS 3S ..tf7+ 1-0 :<;1;;>fS 36.J:[eS+ IbeS 37•.beS
f3-knight from being pinned. as that would weaken the defence of d4. For this reason Black can attempt
6. ... 7. lLlg1-f3
lLlbS-c6
7.tLle2!? to meet 7 ....tg4with 8.£3.
Jonkman,Harmen . Adly,Ahmed
~cS-g4
7. ...
But now 8.d5! is strong. forcing Black to concede the bish op pair with 8 ... .txf3 9. ~xf3 tLle5 lO ..tb5+. as 8 ... tLle5 is followed by 9.tLlxe5!. E)
Wijk aan Zee C 2006 (10)
e7-e5 lLlbS-c6
2 .... 3. lLlg1-f3
4. ~f1-c4 White has an unpleasant initiative.
t",. SVeShlov,Evgeny
'
.~' ,';'~;';
Satyapragyan.Swayangsu · o
Dubai 2004 (2) ,
".
~
.. 1.e4 c5 2.c3 dS ' a.exdS " xdS 4.d4 ,g6 S.lLlf3 Ag7 6.dxcS 'iWxc5 7.'iWb3 0,f6 SJt.e3 "as 9~c4 0-0 10.0-0 •. 0,cS 11.0,g5 e6 12.0,d2 'fic713.Ae2 : t2:idS 14..tc5 J:[dS 1S.l:lfd1 lLlaS ,16.'it'a3 b6 17.Ab4 'Dc6 1S.lLlde4 h6 .19.lLlf3 tiJcxb4 20.cxb4 'it'c2 21.lLlc3 it.xc3 22.bxc3 'iWxe2 . 23.'iWc1 Ab7 ;, 24JifxhS 0,16 2S.J:[e1'ifxf2+ 0-1 ,
'r
1.e4 cS 2.c3 d5 3.exd5 'iWxdS 4.d4 tt:;:c6 Mjf3 cxd4 6.cxd4 eS 7liJc3.tb4 , ; S~d2 bc3 9bc3 e410.lLleS lLlxeS' 11.dxeS 0,e712..te2 .td713.0-0 .tc6 ' 14.'i!t'c1 'We6 1SJtd1 lLlgS16.J:[d6 'Wie7 i17Jt.b4 0-0 18.ttxg61ifxb4 19.:xg7+ ' . 'it'xg7 20.'ifgS+ . whS 21.'iff6+ 'iIigS . •22.'ifg5+ ~hS 23."16+ ~gS . 24.'Wig5+ ~hS 2S.'iWf6+ " V2- 1h
" Tiviakov,Sergey Sakaev.Konstantin KhanryMansiysk 2005 (3)
1.e4 cS 2.c3 lLlf6 3.eS lLld5 4..'tc4 lLlb6 S..tb3 c4 S..tc2 'Dc6 7.0,f3 'Wc7 S.'it'e2 gS 9.h3 Ag7 10.0-0 lLlxe5 11.0,xgS dS 12.a4 .td7 13.a5 0,c814.lLlf3 ·· lLlg6 1S.d4 cxd3 , 1S.bd3 eS 17.a6 , CiJce7 1S.axb7' . 'iiVxb7 19.AaS 'fIIc7 20.lLla3 0-0 21.lLlb5 'ii'cS ' 22 ..te3 0,fS 23 ..l:tfd1 . Lasker,Emanuel lLlxe3 24.fxe3 'ifb6 2S.'.i;h1 ,. e4 '. ," Bernstein,Ossip 2S.lLlh2 0,e7 27.ttld4 .:tabS 2S.J:[d2 < New York 1940 ., ~hS 29.'iVf2 fS 30.g3 lLlg6 31.0,e2 ' i.e6 32.ltld4 .td7 33.b4 lLleS 1.e4 cS 2.c3 dS 3.exdS " xdS 4.d4 'e6 S.ltlf3 ltlc6 6.lLe2 cxd4 7.cxd4 34J:lda2 lLlc6 3S.0,e2 AeS 36Jta3 .tb4+ S.ltlc3 lLlfS 9.0-0 " d6 10.a3 AgS 37.ltlf1 lLleS . 38.0,f4 'ii'hS ~ .bS 11.1lf84 0-0 12.AgS a613.Axf6 39..te2 ,ltlgS 40.ltlhS Ae5 41.bS gxfS ' 14.l:1ad1 bS' 1S."b3 Ac7 l:1bcS 42.J:ba7 J:[xc343.J:l1a2 llb3 , H S.ltle4 'ife7 17.'ii'c3 i.b7 1S.dS 44.h4 J:[b14S.J:[2a6 d4 46.exd4 AdS ~.teS ,, 19.ltlxeS lLlxeS 20.f4 J:[ac8 47.'it'g2 f4 '48.gxf4.¥1.xf4 49.l:1d7 i.c4 ' 21.d6 'ifdS 22.ltlxf6+ iYxf6 SO.lLlxf4 .be2 S1JbgS ..xh4+ ' .23:'iVxeS "xeS 24.fxeS .l:1c5 2S.d7 ::.~. S2.'iYh3 'fixh3+ S3.lLlxh3 hxgS , 0-1 225
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I ;'~
Tiviakov,Sergey Carlsen,Magnus
.. .,.
'
Sanz Alonso,Francisco Javier Miles,A!lthony
.
Amsterdam zt 1978 (15)
Wijk aan Zee 2007 (1)
, ,;
1.e4 c5 2.c3 liltS 3.e5 lild5 4.d4 , cxd4 5.cxd4 bS S.lilf3 eS 7.a3$.e7 , S.~d3 ~b7 9.0-0 lilaS 10.lle1lilac7 11.lilbd2 0-0 12.lile4 f513.exfS gxfS 14....d2llf715.'t'ihS l:tg71S.'ilYh3 f5 17.$.hS fxe4 lS.1:Ixe4 lilfS 19.nh4 ..\k.f8 20.ii.xg7 ' .bg7 21.l:te1 ~xf3 22.gxf3 Ve7 23.wh1 ~f7 24.f4 .tIgS 25.f5 ~dS 2S.fxeS+ dxeS ,27Ji'f3 we7 2S.it.c4 liled5 29.lle5 ~cS 30.it.f1 it.hS 31.l'J:h3 h5 32J~g3 :US , 33.~h3lilg4 0-1 !
1.e4 c5 2.c3 lbfS 3.e5 lild5 4.lbf3 lbc6 5.~c4
Mamedyarov,Shakhriyar Shanava,Konstantin Chalkidiki jT 2003 (7)
':t
; 1.e4 c5 2.c3 t<'f1 .!:taeS 30.Ue3 f4 31.J:le2 J:1cS 32.f3 Wf733.<:5 1-0
Vlassov,Nikolay . Ponomariov,Ruslan . Moscow 2002 (1)
Godena,Michele " Kozul,Zdenko ,
Nova Gorica 2000 (3)
'.
:1.e4 c5 2.
·' ..
"
1.e4 e5 2.c3 eS 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 exd5 '" 5.lilf3 lbc6 . S:~e3 exd4 , 7.lilxd4 i.dS S..ie2 lilfS 9.0-0 0-0 10.lild2 lleS 11.l:te1 as 12.lbfl lile5 13.$.g5 hS 14.$.h4 "lbgS' 15.~93 ' .te5 lS ...\k.f3 , tlxel 11:iWxe1 ~bS ·' lS.lilb3.tt5 19.h7 40.'ilid5 lile3 4Ui'xb7 'iYxb7 " 42.l:txb7 .ie4 " 43.l:ta7 l:tbS 44.15 l:tb2 45.Wg3 J:txa2 46.wf4.· .ixg2 47.we3 lile4 ' 4S.lbd5 h5 ' 49.lilf4 lildS 50.lilxh5 lLlxf5+ 51.wd3 J:Ia3+ 52 ..iPd2 whS . 53.lLlf4 .te4 54.e5 g5 55.tileS 'ud3+; 5S.r;t;>e1 lbd4 57.1baS wg6 5S.h4 lLlxe6 59.:txeS "'",:. 0-1
Sicilian Defence - Minor Systems
Sicilian Defence Minor Systems after 1.c2 -c4 c7-c5 2 ../ c3 ,'" c6
tIe-liked variations, obviously if 2 ... ttJc6, or 2 ... d6, has already been played. But you pay a price: the ugly weakness of the d5-square.
The Grand Prix Attack Chameleon System After ttJb8-c6 2. ttJb1-c3 (or 2 ... e6 or 2 ... d6), White sometimes proceeds with 3. ttJg1-e2
This way, White keeps the option of d2 -d4 on the next move, transposing to one of the Open Sicilian variations. Alternatively, he can prepare a fianchetto with g2-g3, transposing to a kind of Closed Sicilian. The name of the variation is inspired by its chameleon-like capacity to suddenly transform from a closed variation into an Open Sicilian. This can be a headache for Black, who might end up haVing to play Open Sicilian variations which are not part of his repertoire: for example, after L.
After
2. ttJb1-c3 ttJb8-c6 the move 3. f2-f4 is a dangerous continuation. Usually Black opens the diagonal for the king's bishop with 3. ... g7-g6
and after playing ... e7 -e6, the king's knight goes to e7. White, for his part, continues with
~f8-g7
e7-e6
However, it must be said that if Black knows the ensuing complications he can emerge out of them in good shape: ttJg8-e7! 6 .... 227
Ches s Opening Essentials - Volume
7. f5xe6 8. d2-d3 9 . .Il.c4-b3
f7xe6 d7-d5! b7-b5!
It is curious that the idea of the f4-fs sacrifice isn't from the Sicilian but from
228
the English Opening. You reach the same type of position with the English Opening - with reversed colours. We suggest you have a look at the famous 1969 Saidy-Fischer game, in which Fischer played the positional sacrifice .. .f4. The Grand Prix Attack is an effective weapon to use against fans of the Najdorf or Dragon Variations, as both groups generally play 2.. .d6 after 2.tDc3, thus denying themselves the opportunity to play ...d7 -dS in one move, as you would normally do in the mainline.
Closed Sicilian
Closed Sicilian 1.c:2-c4 c7-c5 2.'Lbl-c3 ~ b8-c6 3.92-93
,
<..
In the past decades, the Closed Sicilian was popular with players like Vasily Smyslov and Boris Spassky. Today, too, it has its admirers at all levels - from beginners to grandmasters. By playing 2.tLlc3 before opening the diagonal for the fianchetto, White anticipates on ... d7 -d5, which liberates Black's game. The most common response is 2 ... tLlc6, after which White plays 3.g3, with the idea of developing the fl-bishop to g2. Another good plan for Black is L.e6 (or 3 ... e6) to prepare ... d7 -d5: this is good for players who do not mind playing with hanging or isolated pawns, in positions where good piece play compensates for static weaknesses. The bishop on g2 exerts furth er influence on d5, reinforcing central control, and only later will White shift his focus to the kingside. Beginners should note that to attack effectively on the flanks, the centre should be closed, or
otherwise you must have good control over it. The Closed Sicilian is characterized by White's intention to not open the position with tLlf3 and d2-d4, but instead to playa manoeuvring game marked by the development of the bishop to g2 and expansion on the kingside. The price to be paid for this is a certain weakening of the queenside. In the main line Black usually continues with 3 ... g6, to place the dark-squared bishop on g7, from where it can support counterplay on the queenside ( .. JIb8 , .. ..0,b7-b5-b4). This system utilizes ideas from the English Opening (with reversed colours): 1.c4 e5 2.tLlc3 tLlc6 3.g3 g6. However, in the Sicilian, White's extra tempo changes things slightly. g7-g6 3. 4. il.f1-g2 il.f8-g7 5. d2-d3
we have the typical Closed Sicilian position. 5 .... d7-d6 As we will see, the most common plan begins with 6.f4. However, recently the move : 6 . ~e 3 has become increasingly popular, especially with players at low to medium levels. 229
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
The manoeuvre ~e3 -~d2 -~6, with the idea of ~xg7, h4-h5-hxg6 and 'lWh6, is very dangerous if Black responds mechanically. However, White needs to be careful as well. There is a trap that he can fall into: After 6 ... e6 7.\li+'d2 tDge7 8 .~h6 0-0 9.h4 ~xh6 10.'iVxh6 f61, if White now continues with the thematic 11.h5??, Black wins the queen with 11. ..g5 followed by ...~h8 and ... tDg8. On the other hand, if
White plays the correct move 11. 'iVd 2, he has a small plus. A good plan for Black seems to be to leave the knight on g8 and to begin immediate queenside counterplay with 6 ..J ib8, and after 7.tDge2 (threatening d4) 7...tDd4 8.0-0 e6 9.'YIVd2 b5 or 9 ...tDe 7 , Black has sufficient counterplay. However, as we have already said, 6. f2-f4
seeks counterplay by expanding on the queenside with ...b5-b4. Black fundamentally has four approaches: - develop the king's knight to the natural f6-square. However, placing the knight here has the defect that it is a littie exposed to the advance of White's pawns; - prepare immediate counterplay on the queenside with ... l:tb8 and ... b7 -b5-b4, postponing the decision of how to develop the kingside. - play the direct ... e7 -e5 along the lines of the Botvinnik Variation of the English Opening, with reversed colours; - play ... e7 -e6 and develop the king's knight to e7. The last two options are the most frequently played: A)
6 ....
first glance seems illogical, as it blocks the extended control of the dark-squared diagonal and helps White to open the f-file. However, Black takes possession of the e5-square. Play is more fluid, and it is suitable for players who prefer positions that are more open than those that are produced by 6 ...e6. 7.
is the most common move, planning a pawn storm on the kingside. Black 230
e7-e5
An ambitious continuation, which at
Closed Sicilian which is often chosen because of the following traps that can easily ensnare an unsuspecting Black player. White aims for the f4-f5 advance, and therefore it is best if the knight does not interfere with the scope of the rook on the f-file after kingside castling. After natural moves like 7 ... tZ:lge7 8.0-0, Black may play, as so often happens, the natural-looking B... O-O? Now
The following gambit popular recently: 7. tLlg1-f3 8. 0-0 9 . ..\ll.c1-e3 To prevent IO.d4. 10. e4-e5!?
line has been tLlg8-e7 0-0 tLlc6-d4
White plays the sacrifice 9.f5! obtaining a very good position.
If instead Black plays the more prudent 8 ... tZ:ld4!, again White can either offer a sacrifice with 9 .f5!? or play the quieter 9 ..lte3. Probably the safest thing for Black to do is to exchange immediately on f4, on the 7 th move. 7. ... e5xf4 White cannot recapture with the pawn, because of 8 ...~xh3 and 9 ... 'tIVh4+, gaining a piece. After White recaptures with the knight or the bishop. he will control the d5-square and have pressure on the f-file. However, Black will be left with some trumps: the very active g7 -bishop and the d4- and e5 -squares for the knights. e7-e6 B) 6 . ... The most common continuation. Black fights against the f4-f5 push more effectively this way, and in the event that White prepares for this advance with g3-g4, Black has the option of taking a radical step to prevent it: ... f5; the g8 -knight develops to e7, where it is less exposed to White's pawn storm and exerts influence on the key f5-square.
White opens up the position for his two bishops, frees the e4-square for the c3-knight, forces a weakening of the d6- and c5-squares, and if Black captures on e5 he can exploit the f-file for his attack. Black can defend himself, but his task is not easy. This gambit is not White's only option. Interesting alternatives are: 10Jabl (used by the young Anatoly Karpov), I 0.~d2, or the new idea IO ..ltf2, in order to be able to recapture on d4 with the knight without being forked. In conclusion, the Closed Sicilian, while certainly not the antidote to the Sicilian, has a big plus: it is not necessary to memorize hundreds of variations. It is sufficient just to develop a feel for the typical positions which, because they are strategically complex, tend to favour the stronger player rather than the one who is better prepared.
231
Ch ess Opening Essentials - Volum e I
Adams,Mkhael Kramnik,Vladimir ' Las Vegas FIDE-Wch 1999 (5)
14.0-0 0-0 15.~f2 e6 16.tt:le3 tt:lf7 17.tilc4 Viic7 1S.1:I.fe1 UdS 19.exf5 exf5 20.c3 , bxc3 21.bxc3 d5 22.tt:lce5 tt:lfxe5 23.fxe5 tt:lxe5 24.tilxe5 ~xe5 25."fig5 .§t.b7 26.J:!.a7 lld7 27.c4 ¥Wd6 2S.cxd5 .if6 29.'iHf4 'ttxf4 30.gxf4 l:[bdS 31.l:I.e6 .lUd5, 32JXxd7 ,be6 33.l:txdS+ .b d8 34..ixc5 1f2- 1h
1.e4 c5 Vbc3 ,tt:lc6 3.g3 g6 4.~g2 !iLg7 5.d3 d6 6.~e3 e5 7:iWd2 tt:lge7 8.f4 tt:ld4 9.tt:lf3 0-0 ,,10.0-0 exf4 11 ..ixf4 tt:lxf3+ 12.Uxf3 'i'b613Jlb1 .ae6 14.~h6 1:.aeS 15..1Ug7 Wxg7 16.';f;'h1 f6 17.a3 d5 lS.b4 cxb4 19.J:!.xb4 "fic7 20.tt:lb5 "fid7 21.lb d4 .igS 22J:te3 tilc6 23.tilxc6 1Vxc6 24.h4 b6 25.w h2 'f!lVc5 26.d4 'iWd6 · Bachin,Vitaly 27.exd5 ~xd5 2S...bd5 1lfxd5 29.c4 Motylev,Alexaitder " Sochl tt 200S (5) 'fHf7 30.d5 I!.xe3 31.'fHxe3 tIeS 32.Wd3 ~e7 33.llb2 1We1 34.~d2 1.e4 c5 2.tt:lc3 tt:lc6 3.g3 g6 4.~g2 Vii'xd2+ 35 ..t!.xd2 ~f7 36.a4 tle4 . .tg7 5.d3 d6 6.f4 e5 7.tt:lf3 tt:lge7 37.a5 htxc4 3S.axb6 axb6 39.l:tb2 S.i.e3 ' tt:ld4 9.h3 ' b5 10.0-0 b4 J:ld4' 40J:Ixb6 U.xd5 41 .J:lb 7 + 'il;>gS 11.tild5 tt:lxd5 12.exd5 tt:lxf3+ 42.~g2 h5 43.~f3 Ue5 44..tXa7 w fS 13.'ifxf3 0-0 14J:Iab1 f5 15.a4 exf4 45.:.tb7 ,Ue7 46 ..t!.b6 ~f7 47.J:!.a6 Ud7 16..ixf4 g5 17..td2 ~d7 lS.b3 14'f6 4S.J:l.b6 ~e7 49.Ua6 Ud6 50.Ua5 19J~be1 .i:!.aeS 20:iWd1 'fHg6 21 ..if3 e6 51.hta3 we5 52.11e3+ .: Wf5 g4 22..ih1 Uxe1 23.'ii'xe1 tIeS 53.J:!.a3 .t!.d5 54 ..t!.e3 g5 55.hxg5 24.¥Wd1 h5 25.~f4 ~c3 26.'>th 7 29.~d2 5S.'~f2 Itc5 59.1::4a4 l:I.c2+ 60.~gl llfe5 30:..Iif4 'iff6 31 ..id2 'il'e5 lle2 61.w f1 l:Id2 62.<;.t;> gl <;;t>e5 32.~f4 'JjIe7 33.Vi'c1 , a5 34 ..td2 63.l1a5+ .t!.d5 64.1:.a4 tld1+ 65.<;.t;>t2 .bd2 35.~xd2 'il'e3 36:ii'd1 w g6 J:!.d2+ 66.'~g1 <;£;>f5 67..t!.f4+, ..t.>e5 37.1Ya1 ~d2 3S..t!.d1 'ife3 39.l:If1 6S.J:!.a4 Ud4 69.1:1a5+ We4 70.n xh5 .t!.e5 40.c3 'iWxd3 41.cxb4 axb4, 42,'iit'c1 'iWe3 43.'l!lfc4 'ifd2 44.¥It'b5 <;£;>f3 71.1%a5 ttd1+ 72.wh2 htd2+ tte2 45.]:[g1 f4 46.fibS . f3 73.<;£;> gl J:lg2+ 74.h1 Ue2 75.~gl <;;t>xg3 76.l:ra3+ <;£;>14 77J~b3 " g3 . 47.¥Wxd6+ il:e6 ' 4S.<;.t;>h1 'tINxd5 7SJ:IbS 1f2- 1h 49.'i'fS ' Ibg2 50JXxg2 fxg2+ 51.h2 'iWd4, 52.'ii'eS+ ~f7 , 53.'iVc6+ w g7 54.'i!Vxg2 .b b3 55.a5 Short,Nigel il:d5 56.'*i'e2 'iWe4 57.• 11 'itf3 0-1 <,
. Kramnik,Vladimir WiJk am Zee 2005 (12)
1.e4 c5 2.tt:lc3 tt:lc6 3.g3 g6 4.i.g2 , ~g7 5.d3 d6 6.~e3 UbS 7.llfd2 b5 S.f4 b4 9.tt:ld1 ~b6 10.tt:lf3 tt:lh6 11.a3 a5 12.axb4 axb4 13.h3 f5 232
, Spassky,Boris " , .Hort, Vlastimil '
"
'(
Bugojno 1978 (3)
1.e4 c5 2.tt:lc3 tt:lc6 3.g3 g6 4.il:g2 i.g7 5.d3 d6 6.f4 e5 7.tt:lh3 tt:lge7
Closed Sicilian
S.O-O tLld4 9.f5 gxf5 10.'i¥h5 h6 Spassky,Boris . . 11.1%f2 ~e6 12.ii,e3 'fi'd7 13.1:[af1 Geller,Efim ' 0-0-0 14.tLld5 fxe4 15.tLixe7+ 'iYxe7 ' Sukhumi ~ 1968 (4) 17.ttxf7 " 'ilt'eS , 1.e4 c5 2.tLlc3 d6 3.g3 lbc6 4•.tg2 g6 16..b d4 , cxd4 5.d3 ~g7 6.f4 tLlf6 7.tLlf3 0-0 S.O-o 1S.ii,xe4 ~fS 19.il.f5 'WIxf7 20:~xf7 J:l.xf7 21 ..b e6+ J:!.fd7 22.J:!.f7 Wc7 J:!.bS 9.h3 b5 10.a3 a5 11.i.e3 b4 23 ..bd7 lhd7 ' 24.Uxd7+ 'it>xd7 12.axb4axb4 13.lbe2 .it.b7 14.'iVd2 25.Wg2 w e6 26.'iPf3 d5 27.Wg4 Wf6 .aaS 15..:tab1 .'i:Ya5 16.b3 ];tfcS 17.f5 2S.Wh5 .,tfS 29.tLlg1 b5 30.tLle2 a5 'ifb6 1S.g4 J:!.a2 19.tLlc1 Ua5 .20.l'kf2 .31.g4 a4 32.h4 b4 33.b3 a3 34.tLlg3 'fIIc7 21.tLle2 1'1a2 22.I:.tX:1 'i!VdS 'e4 35.g5+ hxg5 36.hxg5+ We6 23.tLlf4 'ireS 24.tLlg5 tLld4 25.fxg6 37.Wg4 ..tg7 3S.tLlh5 ii,fS 39.96 e3 ' hxg6 26.tLld5 tLlxb3 ' 27.e5 lLlxc1 40.~3 Wf541.g7 . 1-0 . 2S..ixc1 h d5 29..bd5 , tLlxd5 30.'iVh4 lbf6 31.exf6 exf6 32.~h7+ <M8 33.tLle4 ,. 'fIIe5 34i f4 'Wd4+ Short,Nigel 35.<;;f;>h1 J:tc6 36~h6 b h6 37.'i!fhS+ Ye Jiangchuan rj;e7 3S.tLlxf6 ~f4 39.g5 ""e6 Shenyang 2000 (3) 40.li'eS+ Wf5 41.'iVxf7 .:tc7 42.~xc7 1.e4 c5 2.tLlc3 tLlc6 3.g3 g6 4 ...tg2 ~xg5 43;tfe7 '¥fe3 44.tLle4+ wh5 .1Lg7 5.d3 d6 6.tLlh3 e5 7.f4 tLlge7 45.'i¥h7+ ~h6 46.'tWd7 .tf4 47.lbf6+ S.O-O h6 9..ie3 exf4 10.tLlxf4 0-0 ~g54S.tLld5 1-0 11.'iWd2 w h712Jlae1 UbS 13.tLlcd5 .1, tLlxd5 14.exd5 liJe7 15.ii,f2 lLlf5 Spassky,Boris 16.A e4 b5 17.g4 ~g5 1S.<;t;>h1 ~e5 Geller,Efim 19.9xf5 ' b f4 20.~e3 ~xe3 sukhurrii m 1968 (6) ' 2Hlfxe3 gxf5 22 •.tg2 1:[gS 23.i.h3 1.e4 c5 2.lbc3 d6 3.g3 tLlc6 4.~g2 ''i:Yxe3 24Jlxe3 1:1g5 25.l:e7 <;t;g6 g6 5.d3 ·~g7 6.f4 lLlf6 7.lLlf3 0-0 26.: xa7 b4 27.l::tc7 ~f6 2S.d4 cxd4 S.O-O llbS 9.h3 b5 10.a3 a5 11.ii,e3 ' 29.J:Id1 .ta6 30...tg2 ~e2 3U:rd2 " b412.axb4 axb413.tLle2 .tb714.b3 UaS 1S.l::tc1 1;[a2 16.g4 'ilVaS 17.~e1 'IteS 32.h4 1'1g4 33.Uc6 " f4 34.J:Ixd6+ Wg7 35J:Ixd4 h5 36.11b6 'ii'a61S.'i:Yf2 tLla719.fS tLlb5 20.fxg6 f3 . 37J'lxg4+ . hxg4 3S..l:txb4 f5 ~' ,hxg6 21.tLlg5 tLla3 " 22.'iVh4 ticS 39.d6 l::tdS 40.J:!.d4 Wf6 41.c3 w e5 23.J:lxf6 exf6 24.'i¥h7+ Wf8 25.tLlxf7 .42.h5 f4 43.d7 fxg2+ 44;""xg2 lhc2 26 ..th6 r.txc1 + 27.tLlxc1 'it>xf7 ·'. if3+ 45.~g1 g3 46.h6 ii,e4 47.l~a4 2S:ibg7+ ""eS 29.gS f5 30.1hg6+ ., 0-1 •. Wd7 31 :iif7+ ~c6 32.exf5+ 1-0 ~
233
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Sicilian Defence Minor Systems with 2.:I"f3 1.e2-e4 c7-c5 2. L g1-f3
standard Dragon and the Accelerated Dragon. Some play this move with the aim of transposing to an Accelerated Dragon, while avoiding the troublesome Maroczy Bind (white pawns on e4andc4).
'.~.:
In response to 2.tb f3, there are three moves that are significantly more popular than any others. In ascending order of popularity they are: - 2 ... d6 - 2 ... lDc6 - 2 ... e6 We will examine them in reverse order. However, first we will look at the rarely played 2 ...g6, 2 ... a6, and 2 ... lDf6. These lines do not have good reputations. It is doubtlessly true that White can obtain a certain advantage, but, as is so often the case with minor variations, this is not always sufficient to bring victory against correct play. In addition, it is not rare that their surprise value shifts the balance in Black's favour.
Hyper-Accelerated Dragon g7-g6 2 .... This line has been given its name by some experts to distinguish it from the 234
3. d2-d4 c5xd4 Now, the recapture by the f3-knight indeed transposes to the Accelerated Dragon. However, after 4. '\IVd1 xd4 lDg8-f6 Bronstein had the interesting idea of 5. j&f1-b5!? The idea is to play e4-e5 without having to deal with lDc6. To avoid this variation, some players try 3 ...1i.g7!?, and if White plays 4.c4, hoping to transpose into the Maroczy Bind, Black can deviate with the interesting and littleexplored 4 .. .'~Wa5+ or 4 .. .'lJIib6. Naturally,
White has other options, such as 4.dxc5!. White can also try another means to take the game away from typical Dragon positions: 3.c3, with the aim of creating an Alapin position in which Black has already played ... g7 -g6.
O'Kelly Variation 2 ....
a7-a6
Sicilian Defence - Minor Systems wi th 2. tLl f3
In many Sicilian variations, Black advances his pawn to a6 to prevent jJ,bS or lDbs at various stages of the game, and also with the intention to continue with ... bS and possibly ... b4 and .. .jJ,b7. If this is so, why not immediately play ...a7-a6? Among other things, this continuation offers the advantage that if White continues with the thematic 3.d4, Black achieves easy equality with 3 ...cxd4 4.lDxd4 eS! After ali, unlike in variations such as the Sveshnikov or the De La Bourdonnais, the knight is denied the bS-square, and after s.lDfS we have S... dS !, and Black is better. White's best strategic option is to forget about d2-d4 and instead directly play into one of the minor variations of the Sicilian in which the ...a7 -a6 proves to be of little use, for example with 3.c3 or 3.c4. However, in a closed position the loss of one tempo with the a-pawn may not be such a bad thing, and you avoid many highly theoreticallines.
Nimzowitsch Variation 2 .... tDg8-f6 This move produces another interesting system, which many call the Nimzowitsch Variation.
Black plays a type of Alekhine Defence in which White has his knight already on f3 and Black has already advanced his pawn to cS . It is not clear which of the two players benefits the most from this . However, in the main line, White seems to maintain a certain advantage with correct play: 3. e4-eS! lDf6-dS 4. tDb1-c3! e7-e6 4... lDxc3 5.dxc3 is advantageous for White. S. tDc3xdS e6xdS 6. d2-d4 tDb8-c6 7. d4xcS ~f8xcS 8. 'iYd1xdS
and White has a small plus. It should be noted, though, that it is not easy for White to remember the details of all the complications that can arise, seeing how infrequently you come across this 235
Chess Opening Esse nti al s - Volum e 1
defence in tournaments. Therefore, the Nirnzowitsch Variation can be a very dangerous weapon because of its surprise value.
Adams,Michael Tkachiev,Vladislav
....~-;.
~~
France tt 1999/00 (8)
1.e4 ·c5 2,tiJf3 g6 3.d4 ~g7 4.d5 d6 5.i-b5+ .td7 6.a4 liJf6 7.liJc3 0-0 . S.O-O liJa6 9Jle1 h b5 10.ti)xb5 J:l.eB 11.h3 h6 12.!!Ia3 liJb4 13.Itae3 e6 14.c3 tt:la6 15.tt:lxd6 'iixd6 16.e5 'lixd5 H .J:l.d3 'lia2 1aexf6 .b f6 19Ji.xh6 c4 20.trd2 'iWb3 2U!Vxb3 cxb3 22 ..te3 , b6 23.l:ld7 liJb8 24.J:l.c7 J:l.dS 25.tt:ld2 tt:la6 26.J:[c4 ti)c5 27.Ite2 tt:lb7 2S.ti)xb3 Itd1+ 29.~h2 l:I.ad8 30..td4 .txd4 31.tt:lxd4 tt:lc5 32.a5 J:[c1 33.tt:lc6 l:I.d7 34.axb6 axb6 35.J:[b4 ~g7 36.tt:le5 l:lb7 37.tt:lc4 b5 3S.tt:ld6 J:[d7 39.J:l.d2 ~fS 40.J:l.xb5 tt:la4 1-0
Euwe,Max · Rubinstein,Akiba The Hague 1921 (5)
1.e4 c5 2.tt:lf3 tt:lf6 3.e5 tt:ld5 4.d4 cxd4 5.it'xd4 e6 ' 6.c4 tt:lc6 7.'lid1 . tt:lde7 8•.td2 tt:lg6 i 9.'ilfe2 'fIIc7
236
.10..Wt.c3 b6 11.M d6 12.exd6 .b d6 13.tDbd2 tt:lf4 14.'We3 i-c5 15:ft'e4 f5 16.'ifc2 0-0 17.g3 tt:lg6 18.h5 . tt:lge5 19.1i:lxe5 tt:lxe5 20.b4 .b f2+ 21 .'.ttxf2 tt:lg4+ 22.~e2 "iWxg3 . 23 ..td4 i-b7 24.J:l.h3 'iWd6 25.'ii'c3 e5 26.~g1 f4 27.c5 Wh6 28.~e1 e4 29.l:1.h4 'iVg5 30.'iVh3 tt:le3 31 ..b e3 fxe3 32.i-c4+ ..t>h8 33.tt:lf1 ~f6 0-1
Short,Nigel Osterm~yer,Peter
Solingen 1986 (2)
1.e4 c5 2.tt:lf3 tt:lf6 3.e5 tt:ld5 4.ti)c31 tt:lxc35.dxc3 tt:lc6 6.~f4 h6 7~c4 ' e6 S.'We2 b6 9.0-0-0 .tb7 10.h4 , 'i'c7 11.J:[d2 0-0-0 12.J:l.hd1 ~e7 13.a1 • ~b7 34.tt:lxc5+ dxc5 35Jld7 ~d6 ' 36.lhc7+ ~xc7 3nlfe4 l:tff6 3S.13 ' , l:te7 39..tf2 tt:lbS 40:~aS tpc6 41.l:[b1 <;t;>d7 42.'i¥b7+ .tc7 43.~xc5 1-0 ....: ... ,,,"
Sicilian Defence - Rossolimo Variation To better understand the positions that ensue, you should keep in mind the 'sister' variations in the English Opening where Black plays ~b4: I.c4 eS 2.tbc3 tbf6 3 .tbf3 tbc6 4.g3 ~b4
Sicilian Defence Rossolimo Variation 1.e4 c5 2 ..!I f3 Y!..Jc6 3.l.b5
.~
.: .:'
which are closely related. Otherwise there is 4 .e3 ~b4!? The Rossolimo Variation is the most important of the minor variations available to White in response to 2 ... tbc6. It is named in honour of the Ukrainian-born player who successfully employed it from the 1940s. Its recent popularity would seem to be tied to white players' growing respect for the Sveshnikov Variation. An ever-increasing number of them will not 'risk' 3.d4 and would rather steer the game into complex strategic positions, which give the better player good chances of victory. White's position is very flexible: he can push a pawn to c3 and d4; he can exchange the bishop for the c6-knight, or otherwise bring it back to fI after Ile I; he can try to establish strategic positions, or choose a violent gambit continuation. In short, it is ideal for players who prefer to 'play' instead of'remember'.
Leading to the same positions with an extra tempo - or one less - depending on which way you look at it. After 3. ~bS, Black has three replies, (ignoring 3 ... d6, which you usually arrive at with the move sequence L .d6 3 .~bS+ when Black opts for 3 ... tbc6): 3 ... tbf6, 3 .. .e6 and 3 ...g6. A)
3. 4. e4-eS
ttlg8-f6 ttlf6-dS
S. 0-0 237
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume bishop is compensated for by a big lead in development.
Thus, White can establish an insidious set-up, notwithstanding its apparently modest appearance. The eS-pawn is an irritating intruder, which White sets about to overprotect with 6. J:[e 1, in accordance with the teachings of Nimzowitsch. This gives White a certain initiative, and Black must play with great precision to get through the fol lowing part of the game unscathed. B) e7-e6 3 .... A move that is often played. The idea is to avoid doubled pawns on c6 by playing 4 ... tLlge7 (if White does not immediately play 4. ~xc6). At this pOint, the natural 4.0-0 follows (4.tLlc3 is also possible) . However, the immediate 4 ..itxc6!?, before Black takes the measure to prevent the doubling of his pawns, is interesting and increasingly popular.
B1)
tLlgS-e7 4. 0-0 a7-a6 5. tLl b1-c3 tLle7xc6 6. ~ b5xc6 7. d2-d4 c5xd4 S. tLlf3xd4 we have reached a strange Open Sicilian position which is very reminiscent of the Taimanov Variation, in which the absence of White's light-squared 238
But Black's p osition is solid, and in the long term the bishop pair could be to his advantage. Strangely, however, White 's statistical performance is above average! Instead of playing S.tLlc3, it would seem to be more logical to play S.J:l:el, to preserve the bishop, which can now retreat to fl after S... a6.
Alternatively, there is S.c3, to enable the bishop to retreat to c2, with the secondary ambition of occupying the centre with the d- and e-pawns. The resulting game is double-edged. B2) 4. ~ b5xc6 Now Black's best move is 4. ... b7xc6!
Sicilian Defence - Rossolimo Variation
The less active 4... dxc6 is also played a lot, after which White can initiate dangerous aggressive plans with tLlc3, d3, il.e3, 'iYd2, and 0-0-0. 5. 0-0 S. l:tf1-e1
~fB-g7
If
White prematurely seeks to exploit the weak dark squares with 5.e5, this will be in vain becauseof5.. J6 !. Therefore, a better plan for White would include S.O-O and .l:!.el; or S.d3, tLlbd2-c4 and, if possible, eS; or otherwise the opening of the long diagonal for his bishop with b2-b3 . Black responds with the classic manoeuvre ...tLle7 -g6, and it is not rare to play .. .£7 -f6 to prevent White from playing e4-eS, leaving the d7-pawn with the more ambitious task of occupying the centre by advancing .. .dS. However, Black's m ost common choice remains
C)
3.
g7-gS
At this point the eccentric-looking 6 ... llJh6! is the most popular move, and it is also probably the strongest. The knight does not develop to f6, as this would invite e4-eS. It does not go to e7 either, because the advance ... e7 -e6 needed to make this possible would weaken the d6- and f6-squares. After 6 ... tLlh6 Black proceeds with .. .£7-f6, always with the idea of preventing e4-eS, the knight on h6 repositions to £7, the d-pawn advances to d6 and his companion will possibly go to eS; and then Black should have reasonable prospects. C2)
4. 0-0
This remains the most common contin\.1)
uatiOll.
4.
C1) 4. jLb5xcS!? This unprovoked capture is interesting. 4. _ b7xcS
it.fB-g7
5. l:if1-e1 The immediate S .c3 is commonly played, with the idea of conquering the centre with d2-d4. 5.
...
tiJgB-fS
239
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I ,;.
M'
dS 14.lLla4 ~d6 1S.~e3 .b6 16.it.cS lUe8 17.exdS cxdS 18.ti'e3 A bS 19..bd6 'iYxd6 20.lLlc3 ~aS 21.'it'd4 lLle7 22.lLlf2 lLlfS 23.'i'a4 %teb8 24.tfa3 ti'xa3 2S.bxa3 n b2 26.\t>g1 llc8 27.J::tfc1 lLld4 28.lLlcd1 l':[xc1 29.J::txc1 .Ilxa2 30.lLlc3 J::txa3 31.~f1lLlb3 ;, 0-1
Black is now less afraid of e4-eS, as the lLlf6 can go to c7 by way of dS, attacking the bishop on bS . Now that White has castled kingside, after ~xc 6, Black recaptures with the d-pawn and places the c7-knight on e6, aiming for the outpost d4, with a solid position. Therefore White usually chooses S. c2-c3 0-0 7. d2-d4 d7-dS!
NaiditsCh,Arkady Nataf,Igor-Alexandre . Germany Bundeshga 2006/07 (7)
0"
' 1.e4 cS 2.4::lf3 lLlcS 3.AbS e6 4 ..bc6 bxc6 S.b3 dS 6.lLlc3 .b6 7.d3 lLlf6 ' 8.~b2 'fi'aS 9.'i¥d2 c4 10.dxc4 dxc4 H.eS 4::ld7 12.lLle4 ti'xd2+ 13.lLlfxd2 -, nbS .14.0-0-0 cS 1S.nhe1 4::lb6 16.14' : cxb3 17.lLlxb3 lLla4 18..ia3 jt,b7:, 19.4::ld6+ . .bd6 20.exd6 ""d7 21 £ xc5 .bg2 22.~a3 nhc8 23.%td4 , i.c6 24.fS jt,bS 2SJn4 exf5 26.ne7+ ' iwd8 27.11xf7 ~d7 28.nxg7 ,4::lc3 ' 29.1%g8+ jt,e8 -' 30.11xf5 lLlxa2+~ ' 3Vit,b2 lLlc3 32.lle54::la4+ 33.\t>c{ ..t>d734.lLld4lld8 1-0 .,, i
Black plays this without first exchanging on d4, to avoid clearing the c3-square for the knight on b I. 8. e4-eS lLlfS-e4 And Black has a satisfactory position. ;,i" Rossolimo,Nicolas' "'i;'~:",:; " ,'"
Kottnauer.Cenek
'
i
, Fischer,Robert , ' Spassky,Boris ' .. "
Belgrade/Sveti Stefan 'mi 9.92 (II) 1.e4 cS 2.lLlf3 tDc6 3.~b5 g6 4.jt,xc6 : ;. bxc6 S.O-O :.tg7 6Jle1 e57.b4I? cxb4 8.a3 cS 9.axb4 cxb4 10.d4: exd4 H.A b2 ""d6 12.lLlxd41 'lfd7?1 [12 :: . ~f6!?] 13.lLld2 .i.b7 . 14.~c4 , .~, - ttJh6 [14 ...tDf6 lS';.tpxd6+ W'xd6' 16.eS ~ Bologan,Viktor " 'ifdS " 17.exf6+..t>d8 · I8.lLlb3H-;" 14...ttJe7!?].1S.lLlfSlbb2 [lS.:.lLlxfS ; Radjabov,Teimour Turin 01 2006 (5) 16.exf5+ ..t>fll 17.f6+-] 16.lLlcxd6+ · ~f8 [l6 .. ...t>d8 17.lLlxh6! ·' .\k.xaH 1.e4 cS 2.lLlf3lLlc6 3.~bS e6 4.Axc6 bxc6 S.d3 lLle7 6.'fie2 'i!ic7 7.lLlg5 18.'ilYxal+-] 17.lLlxh6 f6 (I7 ... ~xal J "lLlgS 8.f4 c4 9.0-0 cxd3 10.cxd3 I8.'iYxal +- J 18.lLldf7! · 'iYxd1 1 ~cS+11.<;t>h1 f612.lLlh3 0-0 13.lLlc3 19.naxd1 .".We7 . 20.~xh8 nxh8 :
Bad Gastein 1948 (10) 1.e4 cS 2.4::lf3 4::lc6 3.~bS e6 4.0-0 lLlf6 S.J:le1 d5 6.exdS lLlxd5 7.lLleS 'i!ic7 8.'iYf3 ~d6 ' 9.~xc6 bxc6?? 1-0 [9,,,0-01] 10.~xdS
240
Sicilian Defence - Rossolimo Variation
21.4:lf5+1 'gxf5 [2 L.~e6 22.J:td6+.. S.~e3 e5 9.~d2 'tlVe7 10..thS 0-0 WeS 23 J:td7 iLc6 \24.l:te7+ ~f4 11.4:lh2 lXdS 12.4:lg4 4:l18 13"iLxg7 2S.4:le3+-] 22.exf5+ i.e5 23.14 UcS 'it'xg7 14.~hS+ ~gS 15.0-0-0 c4 24.fxe5 . l:Ixc2 25.eS A cs 26.11c1! 1S.dxc4 .bg4 17.hxg4 'iIIc5 18.f3 l:I.xc1 27.l:!.xc1 'it>dS 2SJ:!d1 + We5 '\i'xc4 19.J:lxdS J:!.xdS 20:iYgS .l:l.e8 29.e7 a5 30.l:!.c11 [30.e8'ilf+? .Le8 ,;. 21.'iWe3. ~d4 22.'i¥xd4 exd4 23.4:le2 31.l:tel + ~d432.J:txe8 b3 33 ..I:I.b8 ' tt:leS 24.~d2 J:1dS 25.b3 b5 2SJ.ta1 e3 Jif7 ltJdS 33J:taS lIc7 34.g5 gxf5 35.exf5 37.g41 [Zugzwang; 37.t!b8?] 37..·. wc2 tt:lcS 3S.l:tbS tt:lb4+ 37.~d2 4:ld5 3S.e4 4:lb4 dxcS 5.h3 e5 S.d3 fS!?N 7.c31? tt:lhS 5S.c5 tt:laS 57.cS tt:lc7 SS.tt:lc4 tt:leS S.O-O tt:lf7 9.~e3 g5t 10.tt:le1 A eS 59.tt:ldS+ IMs SO.~d5 ~gS 61.4:le4 11.lb d2 ' h5 12~a3 a513J!ie2 bS tt:lc7+ S2.'.tdS 4:lb5+ S3.~d7 h5 64.gxhS wh7 S5.tt:ldS ' 1-0 14.tt:lc2 l:ta71 15.d4? [1 S. l:!.fd 1!] 1S...cxd4 ',1S.cxd4 Jld7 . 17.dxe5 tt:lxe5:f' 1S.J:1fd1 [18.£4? .fLcS] lvanchuk, Yasily 1S...~e7 19.tt:lf1 ~c4 20.,axd7 'iYxd7 Filippov, Valery 21.~d2 ~d3!? [2l...cS:f'] 22.'iVc30 Chalkidiki tt 2.002 (7) ~xe4 23.tt:lg3 .Yi.d5! 24•.Yi.xbS h4 " 1.e4 c5 2.tt:lf3 tt:lcS 3.Jib5 gS 4..bcs 25.t1Je2 g4 2S.t1Jf4 i.e4?T 27.l:te11 dxcS 5.d3 j£,g7 S.h3 tt:lfS 7.t1Jc3 t1Jd7 'iVf5 2S.tt:leS! .ugS 29.tt:lcd4 tt:lf3+1 S.iLe3 e5 9.'iYd2 ~e7 10.~hSI? 30.'it>f1?? [30.'iWxf3· gxf3 31.tt:lxfS b hS 11.'WxhS fS 12.tt:lh4!? 'i!YfS 13."iWd2 ~e7 14.0-0-0;:1; f5 15.g3 f4 .i.xfS 32.t1Jd4!=] 30....id3+ 3Ul e2 .be2+ 32.w xe2 'i!Ve4+ 33.'il'e3 16.tt:lg2 fxg3 17.fxg3 tt:lfS 1S.h4 h5 19.1:tdf1 tt:le6 20.IU2 tt:ld4 2Ui'g51 tt:lxd4+ 34.t1Jxd4 'iVxe3+ 35.wxe3 ~xg5+0 22.hxg5 l:tfSO 23.l:thf1 gxh3 3S.gxh3 J:Ig51? 37.liJxcS .tc5+ 38..bc5 l:txc5 39.tt:ld4 a4 40.~d3 J:txf2 24.l:txf2± .fLeS 2S.tt:la4 bS l:tc1! 0-1 2S.c3 t1Jb5 27.tt:lh4 O-O-O!? 2S.c4 l:txd3 29.cxb5 cxb5 30.tt:lc3 b4 Adams,Michael 31.1:lfS! .ic4 32.tt:ld5+- .i.xa2 Chandler,Murray . 33.1::131 ·' J:!:d4D 34.tt:lfS! l:!c4+ 35.~d2 ii.b1 3S.<.t>e3 a5 37.tt:lxgS a4 Southend rapid 2001 (2) . 1.e4 c5 2.t1Jf3 tt:lcS ·3..ib5 gS 4.b cs 38.l::!.f1 a3 39.l::!.xb1 a2 40.J:!a1 b3 41.tt:lxe5 1-0 dxcS S.d3 .ig7 S.h3 tt:lfS 7.tt:lc3 t1Jd7 241
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 '<
Akopian, Vladimir Kuzubov,Yury Gibraltar 2007 (9)
~,
"!~
.
.~,
"~~,,...,
":
','
.~."
.~;-,1:;
Morozevich,Alexander McShane,Luke England tt 2000/01 (9)
,',
1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3tt:lcS 3.i.b5 g6 4.,bcS 1.e4 c5 2.tt:lf3 tbcS 3 ..ltb5 gS 4.0-0 dxc6 5.d3 ~g7 S.h3 bS 7.tt:l.c3 tbhS i.g7 S.c3 tbfS 6.d4 cxd4 7.cxd4 lbxe4 8.dS tbdS 9.tt:la3 as 10.'Wa4 8.~e3 f6 , 9."tid2 tbf7" 10.0-0-0 e5 tLla7 11 ..td3 0-0 12.1:!.e1 b5 13.'liVM , 11.tbh2 .\k.eS 12.14 exf4 13••bf4 'ti'd7 14.tLlf3 0-0-0 15.d4 , cxd4 i.b7 14.~h6 fS 15.hg7~xg7 1S.11ad1 tbac8 17.tt:lc2 tbf7 18.tLle3 1S.tt:lxd4 ~b717.~e2 fJie7 18.tt:lxcS 20.'iVh3 nc8 'it>xcS 19.tLld5 'tWe8 20.'1'WaS ~f8 , ' lllcd6 ",19.tbd4 ' 21.Wixa7 ~c5 22.b4 ~d7 23."ifaS ' 21.~b1 l:tc7 22.f41Yb8 23.:f1 "tia7 ~ 1-0 24.~h1 e6 25.15 e5 2S.fxgS hxgS " 27.'ilff3 f5 28.tLlexf5+ gxf5 30:I§Vxf5 dS 29.tLlxf5+ lbxf5 Rossolimo~Nicolas Romanenko,N. 31.~gS+ Wf8 32.'iVxdS+ :tee7 Bad Gaste:in 1948 33.l:txf7-t " ~xf7 :,, 34::f1+ ~g8 3S.'iVg6+ 1-0' 1.e4 c5 2.tbf3 lbc6 3.A bS g6 4.0-0 ~g7 5.Ue1 lbf6 6.tbc3 lbd4 7.e5 tt:lg8 8.d3': tLlxb5 9.tt:lxb5 a6?1 Sandipan.Chanda '10.tt:ld6+1 exd6 11.J.gSI 'iVa5 ; Himanshu,Sharma [II, :','tWb6 12,exd6+ ~f8 li:lleS+! New Delhi2006 (9) ',' r;t;>xe8 .l4.~e2+ r;t;>fS lS.~e7+>t>eS 1.e4 cS2.0f3 tb,c6 3~~b5 g6 '4.0-0 16.l:!.el ! 'and mate Soon follows] iLg7 S.h34Jf6 6.eS ,tLld5 7•.fle11Kc7, 12.exd6+ r;t;>f8 13.l:te8+! ~xe8 8.tbc3 tLlxc3 9.dxc3 tLlxeS 10.tLlxe5 14.'tIi'e2+ >t>f8 15.i1Le7+ , r;t;>e8 'gS 17.tt:lgS 13.A a41:tb814Jbe7+be715.Ue1 , and mate , on f7] 16.i,d8+! · ~xd8wd8 ,16J:!.xe7 <Ji;xe7 17.1i'e4+ 'it>f6 [16. : .~f8 17 ..L:aS+-] , 17.tLlgSI .,' 18.g4 gS19.~fS+ ~e7 20.il.x9S+; P~ttJ95 tbh.6 1~.,~ e7~ ' ~", ' <'''_''0,,1~p, ,.;~" ~8 2.1:*h,~:t.L'd ::; " .,.. ~.".':;.) -G.,;
nea
;
",
242
',.) ' :
Sicilian Defence - Variations with . .. 1Ifb6
Sicilian Defence Variations with ... 1fb6 One of the minor variations for Black which is currently reasonably popular, has the idea of developing his queen to b6 in the first few moves, in other words: before completing the development of the other pieces. It is true that on b6 the queen is not as well placed as it could be, especially if it blocks the path of the b-pawn when it is still on b7. However, it can always reposition to c7, which is the square it most usually develops to in the Sicilian. The advantage of the annoying move ... ~b6 is that it applies pressure on the d4-knight, usually forcing it to go to b3, where it is less active and dangerous thanond4. And if White brings the knight back to d4 after the queen on b6 repositions to c7? He would find himself playing a Sicilian with loss of a tempo! The manoeuvre ... ~d8 -b6 -c7 by Black requires two tempi, while White's <7'lf3 -d 4-b3 -d 4 requires three! 1. 2. 3. 4.
e2-e4 tLlg1-f3 d2-d4 tLlf3xd4
c7-c5 tLlbB-c6 c5xd4 ~dB-b6
This is the most common line. Black directly attacks the knight on d4. The move .. .1Wb6 also makes sense in other variations. Those interested in the move .. .1lVb6 in various Sicilian lines should note the following: - 1.e4 c5 2.<7'lf3 tLlc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 <7'l f6 5.<7'lc3 ~b6; - the Anti-Sozin Variation 6 ... ~b6; - the Poisoned Pawn Variation of the Najdorf; - the Kengis Variation 1.e4 c5 2.<7'lf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.<7'lxd4 ~b6.
, ShabaloY,Alexander Yermol~ky.Alex
> Saint Paul 2000 (6)
:
~'1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 tLlc6 3.d4 cxd4 .4.tLlxd4 1WbS 5.tLlb5 a6 6 ..ile3 'iYdB ; 7.tLld4 tLlf6 8.tLlc3 ·' e5 9.tLlf5 . d5 10.exd5 . tLlb4 11.tLlg3 lLlfxd5 ;12.tLlxd5 1iVxd5 13.ti'xd5 tLlxd5 14.A d2 tLlb4 15.'Ji>d1 il..eS 16.a3 itLlcS 17.il.d3 g6 18.J:te1 f5 19.il..c3 '0-0-0 20.f3 " ~h6 21.<;t;>e2 · %:thf8 ~22.'i.ttf2 e4 23 ..ilf1 tLld4 24.Axd4 ;J:txd4 25.fxe4 ~d2 26.J:ted1 fxe4+ ' 27.'i.ttg1 ~g4 28.lldb1 ., ~e3+ 29.'i,;>h1 il.f2 30.c3 %:tdd8 31.tLlxe4 "il..f5 32 ..td3 J::xd3 33.tbxf2J::d2 34.J:tf1 11xb2 35.'it;>g1 %%d8 3S.g4 ::~d7 37Jlab1 llxb1 38Jbb1 ', tc6 39.l:1d1 tle8 40.h4 .Ile2 41.l:1d4l1a2 ·42.%%f4 J:txa3 43.I:rf7 h5 44.g5 ~ xc3 ~45JH6 a5 46 ..l:l:xgS a4 47J!d6 a3 "48.J:d2 .l:[g3+ 49.'itoh2 .t!g2+ .50.~h3 b5 . . . . . : 0-1
243
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Sicilian Defence De La Bourdonnais and Kalashnikov Variations 1.c4 c5 2 ..'Lf3 ~-,c6 3.d4 cxd4 4 .'!!'·xd4 c5
Current theory claims a slight advantage for White after he exchanges the queens with 8.'iWxf6, as well as when he refuses to simplify and retreats the queen with S. 'lWdS-d1 It is worth remembering that if Black plays S ... tDf6 instead of S ... a6, White has nothing better on offer than to transpose to the Sveshnikov Variation with 6.tDlc3.
Kalashnikov Variation It is interesting now to look at the implications of the move 5. ... d7-dS
.. '-':.
The move ... eS is a violent attempt to resolve Black's problems connected with this opening as early as the fourth move. Its swashbuckling character is particularly evident in the line 5. tDd4-b5 a7-aS!? The De La Bourdonnais Variation, in which Black challenges White to play 6.tDd6 +. S. tDb5-dS+ ~fSxdS 7. 'ilYd1 xdS 'lWdS-fS
244
It was once thought that after 6.c4 White had a clear plus. In reality, here also Black can obtain active piece play in exchange for a positional weakness. This variation was not even mentioned in opening manuals before the 1980s, yet now it has become very popular and it is representative of current trends: with the advent of computer programs and their capacity to defend difficult positions, many continuations that had been dogmatically dismissed as doubtful or unsound, have in fact been proved to be perfectly playable. Naturally, this does
Sicilian Defence - De La Bourdonnais and Kalashnikov Variations not mean that general strategic principals are no longer important! Let's now have a look at some specific moves. White can choose the natural 6.lD 1c3, which usually transposes to the Sveshnikov, or the more thematic 6. c2-c4
The last move fixes the weakness of the d6-pawn by preventing its liberating advance to d5 for quite some time. However, it concedes control of the d4-square to Black. White often makes the knight manoeuvre lDb5 -a3 -c2-e3 to reinforce control of d5 and thus maintains a small but persistent advantage. If Black is to compensate for this positional disadvantage, he must guarantee himself active play with the minor pieces, perhaps exchanging his passive king's bishop (with the manoeuvre ... i..f8-e7 -g5). In addition he needs to try and carry out the ...b7 -b5 break, which, by removing the head of the white pawn chain on c4,lays the foundations for an advantageous opening of the centre with ...d6-d5. Alternatively, there is .. .f7 -£5, perhaps after ...g7 -g6, to obtain a kingside initiative. Fundamentally, White's best strategy seems to be to prevent the realization of
Black's plans, and ifhe reaches the endgame, to try and make the most of his structural advantage. White can also try to advance the pawns on the queenside with b2-b4-b5.
If Black responds with ... axb5, he recaptures with the c-pawn and can then try to exploit his pawn majority on that wing. Alternatively, White can move his knight to d5, where it is strongly placed, and force Black to exchange it, then recapture with the e4-pawn and prepare c4-c5 with b2-b4.
This last plan, which is highly insidious, was used more than once by the young Karpov in the analogous positions that arise in the Classical VariationoftheNajdorf(6 .~e2 e5).
245
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Kuzniin,Alex~y
u,.
Sveshnikov,Evgeny Moscow ch-dty 1987
1.e4 cS 2ltJf3 ltJcS 3.d4 cxd4 . 4.ltJxd4 eS S/ZlbS dS S.c4 .te7 7.ltJ1c3 as S.ltJa3 hS 9.ii.e2 ~eS 10.0-0 ' .igS 11.ltJc2 :ltJge7 12.b3 iLxc1 13.J:[xc1 ttJgS 14.~g4 0-0 1S.ttJe3 ltJd4 1S'ttJe2 'iYfS 17.ltJxd4 exd4 1S.ltJfS ttJeS 19.i.e2 :.bfS 20.exf5 bS 21.f4ltJd7 22.cxbS axbS
246
23.i.xb5 ltJc5 24.a4 d3 25.~h1 ~d4 2SJ tc4 'iYd5 27.J:lc3 lUeS 2S.l:lxc5 dxc5 29.Wxd3 'ji"xd3 30..lUd3 <;WS 31.Wg1 d4 44~bS cS . 4S ..ic4 gS 4S.wg3 ., w bS 47.~f1 J:td4 4S.~c4 llf4 49.~e2 ~7S0.~h2 ne4S1.~d3
V2~1h
Sicilian Defence - Sveshnikov ILasker - PeIikan Variation
Sicilian Defence Sveshnikovl Lasker-Pelikan Variation 1.c4 c5 2.& ,f3 t. ·c6 3.d4 cxd4 4. !; ·xd4
~,f6 S. ~' c3
eS
,';.'
The move S... eS characterizes the Sveshnikov Variation, which was already being dabbled with occasionally by Bird and World Champion Emanuel Lasker as early as the end of the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s. However, it was only towards the end of the 197 Os that it became genuinely popular. At the beginning of this new century its reputation is better than ever: practically all the best players - Kramnik, Shirov, Topalov, Lautier, Ivanchuk, Leko (and towards the end of his career, Kasparov) use the Sveshnikov relatively frequently! Not bad for a variation that was originally considered to be unsound. This does not mean that assessm ents based on positional considerations are no longer valid; it is just that today more importance is given to the dynamic features of a position. In the case in question, it is
true that the dS-square is weakened, but Black's good piece activity makes it difficult, if not impossible, for White to exploit this weakness. This system remains one of the best if Black is playing for a win, even if that entails taking greater risks. In addition, with the proliferation of open tournaments, it is common to encounter players of all levels. As a result, a dangerous opening, though perhaps not completely sound, can be a very useful addition to your repertoire. We will now have a closer look at specific variations. After S...eS, the best response is certainly 6. tiJd4-b5 To try and exploit the hole on d6. Black continues with 6 .... d7-d6 because, unlike in the De La Bourdonnais Variation, the f6-square is not available to the queen anymore. Therefore 6 ... a6? would be a bad error. 7. jLc1-g5 is the most popular move at this point. However, we will first take a brief look at two alternatives: A) White can prevent Black's planned moves ... a6 and ... bS by immediately playing 7.a4
and then relocating the bS-knight via a3 -c4.
247
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I B) Alternatively, White can completely change the distinctive features of the position with 7.tLldS, which forces the exchange 7 ... tLlxdS . After 8.exdS
we have a typical position with a queenside pawn majority for White. He will try to prepare the c2-c4-cS advance and Black will seek counterplay on the kingside, gaining leverage with the eSand fS-pawns. Many Black players consider this continuation to be so unpleasant that they prefer to play the move S... e6 instead of the thematic S ... eS . In this way, after 6.tLldbS (considered to be the best) 6 ... d6 7.ikf4 eS 8.ikgS, you transpose into the main line of the Sveshnikov with 7 .~gS, with both players having made an extra move. However, there is a price to be paid: after S... e6, Black must be ready for the disagreeable possibility that White will continue with 6.tLlxc6 bxc6 7.eS .
248
Kasparov, playing with the white pieces, has scored some brilliant victories using this variation. We will now go back to 7..i.gS.
As we said before, this is the most popular continuation. The pin on the f6-knight accentuates the weakness of the dS-square. This can be considered the initial position of the Sveshnikov system. 7. ... a7-a6 White now usually retreats the knight immediately with 8. tUb5-a3 as it was discovered that the •classical' 8.ikxf6 gxf6 9. tLla3 gives Black good play after 9 .. .fs !. In the past players now continued with 8... ike6, however, from the 1970s onwards players started to employ the move 8. ... b7-b5! This followed a more modern interpretation of the position by the Russian grandmasters Evgeny Sveshnikov and Gennady Timoschenko. It is often called the Cheliabinsk Variation, to differentiate it from the older 8 ... ~e6 variation . Now we are at a major crossroads : White can play the 'positional' 9.tLldS, or the aggreSSive 9.ikxf6 .
Sicilian Defence - SveshnikovlLasker - Pelikan Variation A) 9. tt'lc3-d5 ~f8-e 7 Black also has 9 ... ~a5+ 10 .jLd2 ~d8, inviting a draw by repetition after 11.~g5 .. 10. ~g5xf6 ~e7xf6 11. c2-c3
To make way for the a3-knight. After 11 ... 0-0 1 2.tt'lc2, Black obtains dynamically balanced positions with either 12 .. . jLg5, to exchange the bad bishop, or 12 ... .tl::b8, anticipating the thematic a2-a4 by applying indirect pressure to the b2-pawn.
B)
9.
However, this is fully compensated for by several advantages: a strong central pawn formation, the bishop pair, and counterattacking possibilities on the g-file. 10. tt'lc3-d5 Now we have another important crossroads, but this time for Black: the modern 10 ... jLg 7 or the classical 10 .. .f5. B1) Ji.fB-g7 10.... The Novosibirsk Variation is the modern choice. By delaying ... f5, Black seeks to immediately remove the d5 -knightwith ...li:Je7. White can choose between 1 1.c3 (Black will be wise to meet this with the immediate .. .f6-f5, with good play) and 11. ~f1-d3 tt'lc6-e7 The most logical, but 11 ... ~e6 is also playable. 12. tt'ld5xe7 ~dBxe7
~ g5xf6
The most common choice. 9. ... g7xf6 9..:¥iixf6 is an error because of 1O.tt'ld5 Wlid8 11. Ji.xb5!.
Play has become complicated. Black has the possibility of the pawn break ... f5, to later take possession of the centre with ... d6 -d5 later. The resulting positions have inspired varying evaluations.
Black has grave weaknesses in his pawn structure, especially on the kingside.
B2) f6-f5 10.... This can be defined as the principal move of the entire defence. 249
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
This very complex position has been studied at great depth - chiefly the following two lines: 821) 11. ~f1-d3 I I .~xb5!? should not give White much for the piece after I l...axb5 I 2.tLlxb5 .!:a4!. 11. ... ~c8-e6 12. 'il;¥d1-h5 A more prudent line is 12.0-0 il..xd5! 13.exd5 tLle7 I 4.c3!. with balanced play. 12.... .!:th8-g8! 13. g2-g3 1:Ig8-g4!
White tries to control the light squares. in particular f5. with tLlce3 and iLd3 . The game should be fairly balanced.
!
Anand, Viswanathaii .,.. Ponomariov,Ruslan Wijk aan Zee 2003 (7)
, Karpov,Anatoly
t Sveshnikov,Evgeny , . Moscow ch-URS 1973 (3) ~ 1.e4
with chances for both sides. 822) 11. c2-c3 ~f8-g7 Considered to be the best. 12. e4xf5 ~c8xf5 13. lLla3-c2 ~f5-e6 250
j
,1.e4 c5 2.iLlf3 tLlcS 3.d4 cxd4 : 4.tLlxd4 e5 ' 5.lLlb5 dS S.lLl1 c3 as ].lLla3 iLlfS S.tLlc4 b5 9.lLle3 b4?! ,10.tLlcd5Ilbxe4 11.a3 bxa3 12.l:txa3 .gS 13.c3! ~d7? 14.tLlc4± ,'" l;lbS 15.~e3 f5 1S.~bS .llxbS 17.lLlcxbS :~hS 1S...'td3! 0-0 19.~xe4 fxe4 ' .20.0-0 it.eS 21.J:i:xaS 'ilYh4 22.'ife2 tLldS 23.l:raS+-::-~g7 24.931 .tg4 ;25.gxM ~xe2 26JUa1 g5 27.lLld7f 'rU5 2S.l;lxdS gxh4 29.J:i:gS+1 f5 33.lLlg4 .ltd2 34.lLlge3+ 1-0
c5 2.tLlf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 lLlc6 5.lLlb5lLlfS S.lLl1c3 dS 7~f4 e5 S.~g5 as 9.tLla3 b5 1 0.lLld5 ~e7 .11 ..txfS .bfS 12.c3 0-0 13.lLlc2 Ag5 ' 14.84 bxa4 15..llxa4 a5 16 ..'tc4 'u'bS ,17.b3 ..'te6 1S.'ifa1 gS 19.0-0 'ifd7 20 ..l:i.d1 f5 21.exf5 gxf5 22.b4 axb4 23.cxb4 ~hS 24.b5 hd5 25 ..llxd5
Sicilian Defence - Sveshnikov / Lasker- Pelikan Variation ""'~
....
'~-;
JiJe7 2S.Vlixe5+ dxe5 27.l:txd7 0cS 2S.n c7 ~dS 29.l:cS tDbS 30.l:.b4 (tDxc4 31.Ilcxc4 ~bS 32.';in1 IUdS :33.we2 .b5 34J:tb3 ttd2+ 35.~e3 .f4+ 3S.we4 Uxf2 37.wxe5 Uxg2 38.tDd4 Ilxh2 39J::tcS JLb6 40.tDeS f3 4Ubf3 .l:th5+ 42.wfS n xb5 ;43.n d6 %lb2 44.we7 it.a5 · 112-1/2
Anand, Viswanathan · Kasparov,Garry
~hS
2S.0b4 we7 27.tDdS+ ~f7 29.r.te1 g5 30.l!e2! r.tedS 31.0b41 d5 32.tDcS llgS 33.0xbS ,IbbS 34.h5! ~e7 35.~f1 d4 3S.:t:rc2 e3 37.fxe3 dxe3 , 3S.l:.c7+ wfS 39.ttxh7 e4 40.~c4 l:tdS 41.n f7+ '. ~ e5 42 .l.'~d7 ., 1-0 2S.g4 ·~f4
Ivanovic,Bozidar Sveshnikov,Evgeny Krk tt 1976
1.e4 c5 2.0f3 0cS 3.d4 cxd4 4.0xd4 ,1.e4 ' c5 2.tDf3 tDcS 3.d4 cxd4 0 fS 5,0c3 e5 S.tDdb5 dS 7.it.gS as 4.tDxd4 tDf6 5.tDc3 e5 S.tDdb5 dS S..bf6 gxf6 9.tDa3 b5 10.0 d5 f5 7.i.g5 as S.tDa3 b5 9.0d5 iL.e7 11.~d3 ~e6 12.c4 'ilYa5+ 13.Wfl .10..b f6 ..bf6 11.c3 0-0 12.tDc2 jt,g5 .ixd5 14.exd5 0d4 15.cxb5 axb5 13.a4 bxa4 14.1:txa4 a5 15.~c4 nbS 16.lilc2 tDxc2 17.'ifxc2 e4 lS:iYc6+ ~e7 19...ixb5· .tIa7 20.ifeS+
Unares 2(jOS (6)
251
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
, Spassky.Boris .',., SVeshnikov,Evgeny
~:.
0,e7 . 19.tLlxe7+ 't'Hxe7 20.ic2 ': e4 21.0,d5 Axd5 22.nxdS whS 23.f4 b4 Moscow ch-URS 1973 (12) 24.cxb4 i.xb2 2S.R.b3 'R-a3 2S.'t'Hd1 ·, 1.e4 c5 2.0,f3 0,cS 3.d4 cxd4 Wa7+ 27.'lid4+ Wxd4+ 2SJXxd4 .4.~xd4 ~fS S.~c3 · eS S.~dbS dS ' lIe7 ._ 29.'Ja2 a5 30.nxdS hb4 7.i.f4 e5 S..tgS as 9.~a3 bS ' 31.1%d5 >t>g7 32.We211fS 33.n cHtg6, ,10..bf6 ' gxf6 11.~dS fS 12.it.d3 34.g3 nhS 3S.h4 n gS 3S.nxf5 nxg3 '~eS 13.0-0 Ag7 14.\'i'hS hS 15.c3 . '· 37.1:1gS+ , :.xg5 3S.hxg5 hS 0-0 1S.~c2 fxe4 17..he4 f5 1S.~f4 ". 39.gxh6+ >t>xhS 40.nCS+ ' wh7 ~d7 19.~dS+ 'Oirh7 20.'ifgS+ whS :. 41.<;;i;>e3 :g742..lte6 flg3+ 43.>t>xe4' ' 21.f6 49..ib3 .AdS 50,Uf7+ >t>gS Tseshkovsky,Vitaly ,' . ~;, . . . . , S1.: fS . J:th1 S2.ndS ne1+ 53.<.t>f3 'j, Sveshnikov,Evgeny ,:c ' .il.b4 54...tc4 · Wf6 S5.nb5 "1%d1 Socm 1974.(8)' .'
't.
',,;'
: 5S.nb6+1:1d6s7~:b7nd4 . }
;'1h~V2 '
·1.e4·cS 2.~f3 ~c6 3.~c3~fS .4.d4 ' ' Anand,Viswanathan ' ,; 'cxd4 S.~xd4 e5S.~dbSdS7~g5 · as S.~a3 bS 9...txf6 gxf6 1O.~dS fS " I:eko Peter ,. . . 11.i.d3 AeS12.W'h5 i.g713.e3 0-0 / Wijka:UZ~e200~(2) ; . . . . . . " ,14.g4 fxg4 1S.~c2 f51S.~de3 f4 ':,;· 1.e4 ., c5 " 2.~f3 ~cS 3.d4 cxd4 :17.~xg4 <.t>hS 1S.l%g1l%bS 19.a3 'aSA.lbxd40,f6 5.~e3 eS S.t2JdbS dS . 20.>t>f1 'li'd7 21.~e1 'iff7 22.11Vh4 7.~g5 'a 6 S.~a3 ~: bS 9.$.xf6 · gXf6 'fIe7 23.1thS .if7 24.'iWh3 i e4 · ' 10.~dS fS11~c3 '.tg7 12.exfS .bfS' 2S.l:td1 0,dS 2t)'~f3 ~f6 27..bc4 .·13.~c2 0-0 14.lOce3 ~eS 1S.Ad3 f5 ' .bxc4 2S.0,xfS nxf6 ,.29.lbh4 .eS ·: · 1S.0-o na7 ' 17.~4 li:l~7 ': 1S.~xe7+ : 30.'1i'g2 'iWf7 31.li)f5 . 'tWf8 32.'i!fg4 :;: nxe7 : 19.axbS •axbS 20..bbS : d5 '~f7 33.'iWe2 0,hS ' 34.~xhS f3 · ··· 21.n8S 14 2Ube21? Jt.eSN . 23.J:taS 35.'iIi'xc4 ' 'ili'xhS .. 3S.'ife7 nxb2 'iVdS ~ 24.~b4 ~bi,: 2S.l:ra7?1 d4 '37.'iIi'cS+ J:tfS " ·3S.'tWg4 · l:txf2+ 2S.AaS? .1l.xg2'-+27~c4+.,' ~hS . 39.<.t>xf2 , ~xh2+ 40.1%g2 .. fxg2+ " 2S.J:taS' 'iWcS 29.>t>xg2 f3+ .30.'.ilh1: . . ' 0-1' :., .: t!ixc4 3Ute6 .'tWbS ' 32.J:tdS / e4: :41.We3l:tgS ,.,; ' . " ". 33.l:txd4 · ':ixd4 ' 34••xd4+ . 'ire5. Anand,Viswanathan ' · · · ·35 .•xeS+ l:lxeS 3S.~e21:[b8; ,<:. Leko.Peter . .~.~ 37.ltJe3 :Xe5 38.h3 l:txb2 39. c4 %%g5': Dortmund 2003 (1) ... " , 4O.wh2 'ifo>gS 41.h4llgS 42.Wh3Wf7: 1.e4' eS 2.lbf3 ~eS 3.d4 cxd4:43.~f5l:tc2 44.t;:Je3 J:td2 45.e5 weS 4.~xd4 ; ~16 5.1Oc3 eS S.~db5 ·dS ( 4S.eS 1:[gS 47.e7:XeS 48.'it>g3 :xe7: 7i gS as S.!iJa3 bS 9..bf6 gx16 49.Wf4 nd4 50::a1 llf7.+ 51.<.t>g3: 10.lOd5 f5 11.e3 ~g7 .12.exf5 ..bfS lldS .52.1:[a6+ 'it>eS 53.~g4+ >t>dS 13.~c2 0-0 14.~ee3 ~eS 1S.~d3 fS 54.~fS+ l:!.xf6 55.l:txf6<.t>e5 SSJ1hS'i .1S.0-0 na7 17.'ffh5 naf7 1S.J:tad1 tigS+57.>t>h3e3 .,.",. " .,,:..0-1 ' 252
Sicilian Defence - Accelerated Dragon
Sicilian Defence Accelerated Dragon 1.e4 c5 2. ~f3 ....~ c6 3.d4 cxd4
4/LXd4 g6
The Accelerated Dragon is one of the oldest of the Sicilian variations. It made its distant debut in 1851 in london. The venerable age of the Accelerated Dragon should not come as a surprise if you stop to think about how the ideas behind the Sidlian have developed. If the aim of l...c5 is to take control of the d4-square, then as a consequence 2 ... ltJc6 appears to be the most logical continuation, as is the opening up of the diagonal so as to control d4 further with the fianchettoed bishop on g 7. This logic was irresistible to the early pioneers of opening theory; it is therefore understandable that the fu st examples of the modern Dragon type positions with 2 ... d6 did not appear until the 20th century. In the preceding years Black tried to deal directly with the famolls Maroczy Bind, which takes its name from grand-
master Geza Mar6czy (1870- 1951), who was one of the strongest Hungarian players of all time. This formation, which was first played at the beginning of the 20th century, is renowned for its great solidity and reliability. Frustrated by the difficulties presented by the Mar6czy formation, players started to experiment with 2 ... d6. Profiting from the fact that the knight is still on b I, White seizes fum control of the centre with 5.c4 (this is the key move of the Mar6czy Bind) and greatly reduces Black's chances for counterplay. In the beginning, this did not appear to be so worrying for Black, in that it was widespread usage to first play 4 ... ltJf6, and only after S.ltJc3 to continue with S... g6. In this way White no longer has the c2-c4 pawn advance at his disposal. However, it did not take long to discover that after the sequence 6.ltJxc6 bxc6 7.eS!
7 ... ltJg8 (sad necessity, as the pawn sacrifice 7 ... ltJdS 8.ltJxdS cxdS 9. ~xd5 !:Ib8 fails to 10.e6! fxe6? II.'lWe5! hitting two rooks), White is better, notwithstanding the fact that the pawn on eS is so far advanced that it could be subject to a counterattack. Then someone thought of substituting 2 ... ltJc6 with 2 ... d6 so that the pawn
25 3
Chess Openinn Essentials - Volume 1 advance to e5 would not longer be possible. And this is how the 'normal' Dragon came to make its debut in 1924: l.e4 c5 V1Jf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 tLlf6 5.tLlc3 g6. The name 'accelerated' was added later and indicates the opening of the fianchetto diagonal on the 4th move instead of on the 5th as occurs with the 'standard' Dragon. This means that the standard Dragon has the virtue of preventing the Maroczy Bind, but as we will see in the section that deals with the Maroczy, all that glitters is not gold. The problem is that there is less central influence exerted on the centre with 2 ... d6 compared to 2 ... tLlc6, and this means that White can more freely choose continuations that would be dubious against the Accelerated Variation. A good example of this is the popular 9.0-0-0 in the Yugoslav Attack in the standard Dragon. As always, the final choice boils down to questions of taste and style of play The Accelerated Dragon could be an excellent choice, if a player does not mind the positional struggle that ensues after the imposition of the Maroczy Bind.
At this point Black generally responds with ~f8-g7 5 .... The following subtle sequence is also popular: 5 ... tLlf6 6.tLlc3 d6!? Only after 7 .~e2 or 7.f3 (after 7. ~e3 Black has the unpleasant intrusion of 7 .. .tLlg4), Black proceeds with 7 ... tLlxd4,
before White plays ~e3, with the object offorcing White to take on d4 with the queen. This modern approach is called the Gurgenidze Variation, and it is characterized by an early exchange on d4, which reduces White's options. After S. ~xd4 ~g7
Maroczy Bind We will look at 5. c2-c4 in some depth, both because it is popular, and because it is also objectively the best move. You must remember that it is not uncommon to reach the Maroczy pawn formation by means of the Symmetrical English: l.c4 c5 2.tLlf3 g6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 tLlc6 5.e4. 254
Black moves his queen to as; the cS-bishop to e6; the fS-rook (after castling) to cS; and then the a-pawn to a6, preparing ...b5, exerting a lot of pressure on the queenside. White. for his part, can seek aggressive counterplay on the kingside with f4-f5. He can also de-
Sicilian Defence - Accelerated Dragon velop his queen's bishop to e3 (or to g5), retreat the queen to d2 and then playa timely ttJd5 (without castling, so the king can recapture on d2). If this is followed by an exchange of queens, an endgame, or better still, a queenless middle game ensues that is often favourable for White. After the likely exchange on d5, White can choose e4xd5, which means he will then exert a certain amount of pressure on the e7-pawn by means of the semi-open e-file. Alternatively, he can play c4xd5, hoping to control or exploit the open c-file. When this file is open, it is common for the major pieces to be exchanged on this file. The ensuing endgame is very often in White's favour, because of his space advantage and the possibility to exploit the weak c6-square, against which Black will be induced or forced to play ... b7 -b6 or ... b7 -b5 . Now we will return to 5 .. .~g7. After the obvious moves 6. il.c1-e3 7. tLlb1-c3
This continuation fell into slight disrepute from the beginning of the 1970s, but now it is again considered to be playable. S. ~d1xg4
tLlc6xd4
Now the best move is, curiously, 9.
~g4-d1!
to safeguard the queen against the latent threat posed by the bishop on c8, to defend c2, and also to attack the knight on d4. Now Black can continue with the aggressive but dubious 9 ... e5, or with the more reliable tLld4-e6 9 .... The knight is well placed on e6: there, it controls c5, d4 and f4, and in the variations with ... 'i¥a5 it also sometimes supports the pawn push ... g6-g5 [!]. This can be seen in the following line, which at first sight appears to contravene the most fundamental strategic principles: 10. :i:l.a1-c1
'iYdS-a5
11. 'iVd1-d2 12. il.f1-e2 13. f2-f3 14.0-0 15. J:!f1-d1
b7-b6 il.cS-b7 g6-g5!? h7-h5!?
tLlgS-f6
Black must make his first big choice: 7... tLlg4, or 7... 0-0 (with or without ...d6) . A) tLlf6-g4 7.... The Simagin Variation.
White has a slight space advantage, but Black's position is flexible and playable. 255
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume B)
0-0 7.... S. ~f1-e2 with two likely continuations: 8 ...d6 or 8 ...b6.
s....
d7-d6 9. 0-0 ~cS-d7 and you reach one of the key positions of the defence. B1)
up the position will always favour White ! b7-b6 B2) S.... An alternative to 8 .. .d6 that has its fans, in part because of a couple of traps that White can fall for! After 9. 0-0 ~cS-b7 if White plays the solid 10. f2-f3
.i ~
..t. .l~
Strangely, you can also arrive at this position by means of the King's Indian Defence : 1.d4 tLlf6 2.c4 g6 3.tLlc3 ~g7 4 .e4 d6 5.tLlf3 0-0 6 .~e2 c5 (instead of the more common 6 ...e5) 7.0-0 cxd4 8.tLlxd4 tLlc6 9 .~e3 ~d7. In this position Black's typical plan is to exchange on d4, move the bishop to c6 in order to force White to play f3; then transfer the f6 -knight to c5 via d7 ; advance the pawn to as; and to close the game by placing pawns on the dark squares. Black's defensive strategy would make it advisable to exchange the dark-squared bishops, to limit White's offensive possibilities, and leave him with the 'bad' e2-bishop. For his part, White will patiently prepare slow play on the queenside with llab 1, 1:'1fc1, ,0, a3 and ,0, b4 . That is, when it is tactically feasible to do so. However, it should not be presumed that opening 156
'i¥.i~
.I.
~.l
.t. .I.
~.l
he obtains the customary space advantage with slightly the better chances. However, if he tries to be clever, speculating on an exchang e on g7 with a following check on d4, his plan will backfire: 1O. fii d2? ! tLlxd4 l1. jg,xd4 est 12. ~xeS tLlxe4 (now yes) and Black has the advantage . Or 1O. :r:J. c1? tLlxd4 11 .~xd4 iih6t winning at least a pawn or the exchange .
Standard Accelerated Dragon Back to the initial position of the Accelerated Dragon. If White does not like the idea of the positional struggle inherent to the Mar6czy Bind, he can deviate with the more direct ~fS-g7 5. ttJb1-c3 ttJgS-f6 6. ~c1-e3
Sicilian Defence - Accelerated Dragon B)
Now White must show the utmost care. Black has not yet played ... d6 and here he can play ... d7 -dS, which in variolls Dragon variations frees the defender's game. in one tempo. In addition, some of the lines with .. :iHb6 are particularly effective in this defence. White can choose between the pseudo-active 7.tbxc6, the solid 7.i..e2 and the aggressive 7.i.c4. A)
7. S.
tt.Jd4xc6 e4-e5
b7xc6
0-0
To prevent .. .d7-dS. Now Black usually replies 8 ... d6, transposing to the classical lines of the standard Dragon. It is worth remembering that if in this position, White tries to steer the game in the direction of the Yugoslav Attack of the Dragon Variation with 7.f3?! 0-0 B.~d2?!, Black can obtain good play with B... dS! (here requiring only one
tempo). C)
tt.Jf6-gS S. The pawn sacrifice 8 ... tt.JdS!? is playable and Black's compensation should be sufficient. With the text, Black should be able to equalize after either 9.f4 tbh6 or 9.i..d4 f6.
7. iLf1-e2 S. tt.Jd4-b3!
7.
~f1-c4
This can be considered the most aggressivemove. White tries to get back into the main lines of the Dragon Variation by castling queenside and initiating a pawn storm on the kingside; alternatively, he 257
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 can continue more solidly with h2 -h3 and 0-0 . Black can allow this ifhe wishes, but he also has the possibility to enter quieter variations; or, if he likes, more aggressive ones. C1)
7.
'fi'dS-a5
The 'quiet' variation which, thanks to the combined threat of 8 ... ttJxe4 and 8 ..'ifb4, forces White to castle kingside. This greatly reduces the dynamic rhythm of the game. Black now has a position which is not particularly active, but playable. The most popular line in this variation is : S. 0-0 0-0 9. ~c4-b3 10. h2-h3 11.12-14 12. ~e3xd4 13. iVd1-d3
d7-d6 il.cS-d7 t2Jc6xd4 il.d7-c6
and White has an edge. If Black intends to be more bellicose, he can continue with the normal C2) 0-0 7. ... to which White may respond by establishing the classic set-up of the Yugoslav Attack: f3, 'lI:Vd2 and 0-0-0.
258
S. .ic4-b3
White has to play this way in order to defend b2! Sf3?! allows s...'JltIIb6!
9.i!.b3 ttJxe4!, and Black is better. Please take note of a typical error often made at this point, even by many strong players: S... ttJaS? (It is natural to want to rid yourself of the strong bishop on b3) and now 9.eS ttJeS allows for the brilliant 1O.~xf7+! rJ;;xf711.ttJe6!!
and White wins material, as happened in a famous game between Fischer and Reshevsky, New York 1958 . Back to 8.~b3. The hyper-aggressive variation that we referred to is 8 ... a5, threatening .. .a4 followed by ... ttJxe4. White can react solidly with 9.a4 or defend e4 with 9.f3. Now Black can play 9 ... d5!?
Sicilian Defence - Accelerated Dragon bishop on b3 gives Black an additional possibility: the Parma Variation: 10. ... <1:Jc6xd4 11. ~e3xd4 b7-bS!?
After correct play, as with 10.it..xdS! tDxds II.exdS tDb4 12'tDde2 ~fS 13 .l:tc I, White should have a small advantage, albeit of a type that requires great skill to exploit. The latest development is that White simply allows Black to carry out his plans, playing 9.0-0!, as after 9 ... a4 I 0.<1:Jxa4 <1:Jxe4, Black is seriously hampered by the weakness of the b6-square. The standard variation is S.... d7-d6
For a long time this was considered to be one of the best anti-Yugoslav Attack variations. However, nowadays we are not so sure: after 12. h2-h4 a7-aS 13. a2-a4 bSxa4 14. <1:Jc3xa4 Black still has difficulties to overcome. ~;
Bacrot.Etienne «,
~::" Tiviakov.Sergey . Wijk aan Zee 2006 (2) (1.e4 cS '; 2.<1:Jf3 tt:lc6 3.d4 cxd4 ' . 4.tt:lxd4 . 96 S.c4 tt:lf6 6.tt:lc3 d6' 1VLic2 A g7 8.~e2 <1:Jd7 9.~d2 tt:lcs ' : 10.0-0 0-0 11.b4 ltJe6 12.:'c1 llled4 ' 13.lllxd4 tt:lxd4 14;iLe3 ' tt:lxe2+ ;'1S.'iVxe2 A e616.llld5 'Wd7 17JUd1 b6 1S.b5 f5 19.exfS t!.xfS 20.lllb4 · 'iLf7 2VZJc6 lIeS. 22.1Vd3J:!.cS : 23.1!i'e4 J:!:c7 24.a4 h5 2S.h3'ii'e6 :26.1Ifxe6 iLxe6 2Hi e1 Ac8 28.aS ' bxa5 ·'29..txa7. '>f;;f7 30.~b6 l:rxc6 . ;31'.bxc6 a4 32.:ted1 a3 33.~d4 ~..IUd4 ' 34.':xd4 Ae6 35.:'dS weS ~ 36.l:txf5 gxf5 37.:'a1 wdS 3S.l:txa3 ('wc7 39Jle3 ~xc4 40.J:lxe7+ Wxc6 :,"
and we have returned to an 'almost normal' Dragon position. 'Almost' in the sellse that after 9. f2-f3 ~cS-d7 10. 'tIk'd1-d2 White has already moved the bishop to b3, whereas in the Dragon. in the strict sense of the term, you usually prefer to first play h2 -h4 or castle queenside. The
'4 U3 ~~,.,.. .,_ . "
""
.1 ~O
259
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
.llf8 53 ..ttxh7 .!:tf2+ 54J:td2 l£~d2+~ S5.Wxd2 l:txb3 56J:te7 J:th3 57.h7 Buenos Aires 1994 (3) . ' b6 5S.A e4 , WdS 59.l:b7 ., A d4 60.~f5 <;i;>e8 61.l:id7 AeS 62J:tb7 1.e4 c5 ' 2.lbf3 tLlc6 ' 3.d4 cxd4 Ad463:~96+ <;i;>dS 64 ..ih5" l:t8'3 '4.tLlxd4 g6 5.c4 tLlf6 6.tLlc3 d6 7.~e2 tLlxd4 S.'iWxd4 ~g7 9.iLe3 0-0 65Jbb6 ~c7 66.llbS l:txa4 10.'ifd2 "A e6 11.0-0 \!VaS 12.ttab1! " 67.Ibg5 t!.b4 6S.wd3 it.b2 69.lba5 l:tfcB 13.b3tLld7 14..llfc1 ft'dS ",' ~d770J:raB ' 1-0' ' 15.tLld5 tLlc5 16if3 as 17.h4 hd5 1S.exd5 'ifd7 ,19.'iVe21 l:teS 20.hS Short,Nigel "'f5?1 21.11d1 .i.eS 22.g4 'liVcS Larsen,Bent: . 23.~g2 il.g7 24.l:th1tLld7 25.hxg6 hxg6 26J:rh4~ a4 27.J:tbh1 axb3 ·, Brussels 1987 (1 1) 2S.axb3 l:te1 29.:ct1h31 flaB 30.l:th7 1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 , tLlc6 3.d4 cxd4 'ifa2 31.llxg7+1! wxg7 32 •.!td4+ f6 4.tLlxd4 g6 S.c4 : A g7 6.~e3 tLlf6 33.'iWe3 tLlf8 34.~e411 'wf7 35.l:thSI 7.tLlc3 tLlg4 8.'iWxg4 tLlxd4 9.'lWd1 1-0 tLle6 10.l:tc1'it'aS 11.i.e2 b6 12.0-0 il.b113.f3 gS 14.a3 'it'e515Ji'd2 h5 16.l:tfd1 d6 17.b4 h4 1S.tLldS :~ 19. Af1 iLc6 20:iWd3 ttJf4 21.ttJxf4? KaSparov,Garry " Kasimdzhanov,Rustam , gxf4 22.ll.d4 'ifxd4+ . 23.~xd4 Batumi tt rapId 2001 (11) .. hd4+ 24J:lxd4 l:th5 2S.c51? dxeS 1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 tLlc6 3.d4 cxd4 26.bxc5 bS 27.e5 h31 28.J:!e1 hxg2 4.tLlxd4 g6 S.c4 tLlf6 6.tLlc3 de 7.f3 29.ihg2 . ticS 30..llxf4 ,~d5 31.e6 tLlxd4 B.'ifxd4 A g7 9.~e3 0-0 f6+ 32.h4 .llxeS 33 ..ih3 . ~c6 10Jtd2 A e6 11.J:!c1 'iVa5 12.A d3 34.'iW2 J:l.hd5 35.l:e3 fS 36.h5 wg7 l:!:fcB 13.b3 a6 14.tLle2 'i!fxd2+ 37.h6+ wxh6 3S.l:th4+ ~g7 39.14 15.r;t>xd2 tLld7 16.tLlf4 tLlcS 17.iLe2 :tc2+?? 40.we1 J:!c1+ 41.'it>e2 A eS as 1S.h4I;!; tLla6 19.1:tb1 tLlb4 20.a3 42.11g3+ il.g6 43 ..llhS?? .llc2+ tLlc6 21.tLlxe6 fxe6 22.f4 ~f7 23.h5 44.we1 l';lc3 45.llxc3bh5 46J:1c1. 'it>f6 47.11xa7 J:l.d4 · 4B.hf51? ~xf5 tLld4 24 ..td3 eS 25.15 951 26.h6! .iJ..f6 27.g4 tLlf3+ 2B.~e2 tLld4+ 49JIxe7 l:!.dS 50.a4 bxa4 S1.J:l.a7 29.>t>f2 e6? 30.l:th5?;!; :tc71 31.a4 l:id4 52.:taS+ IiPg4 53.e7 il.e8 54.15 l:I:gS 32.l:thh1 ne8 33 ..tthd1 l:taB ' liPg5 55.1:1a8 l:te4+ S6.'it>d2 :txe7 57.'it>c3 ~xfS 58.'it>b2 ~e459.t!dS 34.it.d2 .llc6 35.,A c3 .' nb6 36 ..bd41? exd4 37.e5 il.xe5?± il.d7 ; 60.l:tbS wd4 61.l.'rb 7 : l:ie2+, 3S.fxe6+ we1 39.we21 nfB 40.:111 62.'it>a3 J:!e3+ 63.~b2 a3+ 64.wa1 il.e6 ' 65,llb1 r;t>c3 66.J:Ic1 + >t>b4 il.f4 "41 •.i.f5 .llhB 42.'it>d3 iLe5 43.ll.e4 A f4 44.~f5 il.e5 45.Wc2! 67.:tb1 + i.b3 6B.l:Ic1 l:le2 69J1g1 :td2 70.l:tg4+ il.c4 71.J:!g1 il.d3· A f4 46.nbd1 A e3 47•.b4 wxe6 48.A d5+ ~d7 49.l';lf7+ . ~cB+72 •.llc1 .tc2 73.~82 ~e4+ 74.~a1 50•.l:tg7 i.f4 5Ulxd4 A e5 52 ..lld3 .i.d3Z 0-1
Ivanchuk,Vasily ., Anand,Viswanathan
, ~,
·, '
<
wfS
260
Sicilian Defen ce - Accelerated Dragon
'.,,',
Leko,Peter ' Piket,Jeroen Tilburg 1997 (7)
1.e4 c5 ' 2;tbf3 tbc6 3.d4 , cxd4 4.tbxd4 g6 5.c4 ~g7 6..ite3 tbf6 7.tbc3 tbg4 S.'iixg4 tbxd4 9.'t!.\'dl tbe6 10.l:rcl 'iYa5 11.a3 b6 12..itd3 g5 13.0-0 i.b 714.t!.c2 .§Lxc3 15.t!.xc3 'ife5 16.11e1 h5 17.~d2 J.:th6 lS.h4?! 'l:!g6 19.hxg5 tbxg5 20.'ii'xh5 ~g7 '21.>tIfl tbe6 22.g3 0-0-0 23.i.e3? t!. hS 24.'iff3 " J:th2 25.c5 , llfS ' •2S.cxbS+ wdS 27.i.f4 tbd4! 2S.'fie3 'ii¥g4 29.'i fxd4 'iWt3?? 30.'iYxd7+! 1-0
Adams,Michael ' Gonzalez,Bernal Manuel , Istanbul 01 2000 (2)
~ 1.e4
,
55.J:!e5+ wd2 5S.l:te6 h5 57.14 l:ta5 5S.'Ot>f3 d3 59.n dS wc2 SO.'if,;>e3 l:ta3 6Utd5 1:txaS 62.: c5+ wdl S3.'~xd3 1-0
Svidler,Peter
Carlsen,Ma~us Morelia/Unares 2007 (7) •
1.e4c5 2.tbf3 tbcS , 3.tbc3 gS 4.d4 cxd4 5.tbxd4 .ig7 S.ll.e3 tbfS 7..ic4 0-0 8.~b3 eS 9.0-0 d5 10.exd5 tbxd5 11.tbxd5 exd5 12.c3 tba5 13.'iWd3 tbxb3 14.Bxb3 a6 15.§'d2 lleS , lS.J:tte1 Ad7 17.tbc2 jLc6 lS.~d4 fS 19.1lxeS+ ~xeS 20.h3 ~f7 21.tbb4 .its 22.tbxc6 bxcS . 23.b4 ~d6 24.b5 cxb5 25..ixfS a5 2S.Ad4 li't4 27.'ihf4 Y2- V:z
c5 2.tbf3 ' tbc6 ,, 3.d4 ·" cxd4
4.tbxd4 g6 5.c4 fig7 S..te3 tbf6 Shirov,Alexey 7.tbc3 0-0 S.Ae2 ' d6 9.0-0 i.d7 Ivcuichuk, Vasily .10.J:te1 tbxd4 11 ..ixd4 fic6 12.~d3 Wijk aan Zee 1999 (13) a5 13.'it'd2 tbd7 14.b g7 wxg7 1.e4 c5 2.tbf3 tbcS 3.tbc3gS 4.d4 15.t!.e3! h6 16.~e2!?;!; a4 17.h41 · cxd4 5.tbxd4 .ig7 S..§Le3 tbf6 7...tc4 ~a5 18.h5 g5 19.11fl 'ife5 20.tbd5 0-0 S..ib3 dS 9.f3 .itd7 10.'ii¥d2 a3 21.bxa3?# eS 22.g3 whS . tbxd4 11 •.b d4 b5 12.h4 a5 13.a4 23.'it>h2·' g41 24.tbb4 tbfS 25.tbxcS bxa4 14.tbxa4 i.eS 15.tbbS tta6 lS.tbd5 .ixd5 17.exd5 'lilic7 lS.1:1a4 bxcS , 2S.'+lYd1 tLlxe4 27.'it>gl f5 ;llbS 19.h5 tbxh5 20..ixg7 wxg7 2S..itd3 d5 29.cxdS ' exd5?=i! 21.g4 · tbfS 22.'Wh6+ 'Ot>gS 23.l:tf4 30..be4 fxe4 3Ui'xg4 n a732.11cl lIYc5 24Jlxf6 exfS 25.wdl ttxb3 ,; 'Wb2 33J Ul ttg7 34.'ifdl '/We5 '26.cxb3 'ii'xd5+ 27.Wc2 J:[cS+ 35:iWc2 lUS 3S.a4 l:Ie7 37.lltel 'iVdS?# 3S.'iVb2! Wh7 39.a5! c5?;!; 28.'if,;>bl 'i/Kd3+ 29.'if,;>a2 95 30.'iVxfS 40J:tb3! d4?+- ". 41.l:!bS 'ii'e5 'iWgS 31:~'e7 <;t>g7 32.l%dl h6 42.11xe4! "ilxe4 43.llxfS · 'i/Ke1+ 33:iWd7 ttaS 34.'i!i'cS n bS 35.'~c7 ' 44.'if,;>h2 'ii'e2 45.'ii'b3?;!; 'iYxh5+ ,J:l:a6 3S.'i t'c8 l:ta7 37.'ficS d5 47.'lWf7+ 'ifxf7 4S.Wg2 . l':i:el 3S.'iYc3+ tS 39.l:txd5 a4 40.bxa4 4SJl xf7 + ~g6 49J:td7 Wf5fti . li'f7 41.'i/Kb3 l:txa4+ 42:~'xa4 'ii'xd5+ '. 43.'ii'b3 'ifa5+ 44.'iYa3 50.l1d5+ 'Ot>e4 51.tl.xc5 J:Ie2?+Wid5+ 45.'tWb3 V:z- 1h 52.a4 1:a2 53.aS J:!.xa4 54.f3+! we3
261
Chess Opening Essenti als - Volume I . . .. . . ... lbe8 9.c4 ltJc710.ltJc3 11b8 11.'ud1 b5 12.b3 f5!? 13.cxd5 exd5 14.d4 Yi.a6 15.'ilfe3 ltJe6 16.lbe2 b4 17.dxc5 ' ~
Sicilian Defence Minor Systems after 2 ... e6
~.
..bc5 1&1Wd2 'ilfb6 19.1t:lf4 tiJxf4 . 20.gxf4 l1bdS 21 .~b2 d4 22.ttJg5 · l1feS [22 ...ltJe7!] 23 ..:tacl It:le7 ' 24.l:!xc5 Vixc5 25.lt:le6 'ilt'b6 26,lt:lxdS . 'l1xdS ' 27..hd4 tfgS 2&'ifxb4 ttJc6 ' ·29.1i'c3 ~b7 30.wh1'+- h5T31.l:td2 .h4 32.h3 11c8 33.'ifb2 'iff7 34.l:tc2 · .'ilfd7 35~e3 tiJb4 36.l1xc8+ 'iWxc8 ,37.'ii'd4 bg2+ 38.'ii;>xg2 'ifb7+ 39.w h2 a5 40.e6 ltJd5 4UHe5 It:le7 42JWXa5 _. 1-0
Zhang Zhong Kobalia,Mikhail Ubeda 2001 (8)
After 2... e6, White can decide not to advance the pawn to d4, to avoid some of the better-known theory. With 3.d3 or 3.'iVe2, you generally transpose into variations of the King's Indian Attack, which is arrived at with the following moves: ltJf3, g3, ~g2, 0-0, d3, ltJbd2 and e4. The precise order of the moves is usually not so important. It is so named because White is playing a King's Indian Defence with colours reversed. White can also open the diagonal for his queen's bishop with 3.b3 or seek to transpose to the Alapin with 3.c3 or, with the non-committal moves 3.ttJc3 or 3.c4, to an Open Sicilian on the next move.
Psakhis.Lev Strikovic,Aleksa Yerevan 01 1996 (3)
1.e4 c5 2.tbf3 e6 3.d3 ltJc6 4.g3 d5 5.iYe2 It:lf6 6.Ag2 Yi.e7 7.0-0 0-0 S.e5 262
1,e4 c5 2.ltJf3 e6 3.d3 lbc6 4,g3 'ltJge7 5.~g2 g6 6.0-0 Ji..g7 7.c3 0-0 , S.d4 cxd4 9.cxd4 d5 10.e5 ltJf5 11.ltJc3 f6 12.g4 ltJfe7 13.exf6 l:txfS , 14.~e3 l:!fS 15.'ifd2 ~d716.h3 ltJc8 . 17Jlfe1 lbd6 1S.b3 1i'a5 19..:tacl . 'l1ac8 20.'itd3 It:lb4 21.'iVbl It:lc6 :22.1i'd3 tbb4 23.'ii'd2 lDc6 24.~f4 .ltJf7 25.'ii'e3 lDb4 2S.h4 ltJxa2 '2Vt:lxa2 ~xa2 2S.h5 't!fa3 29.hxg6 : hxg6 30.'ilfd3 'We7 31.l:txc8 ~xcS 32.g5 ltJd6 33.bd6 'ii'xd6 34.'iVxg6 ,'iff4 35 ..:te3 'ii'f5 36.ibf5 ):txf5 ' 37.Ah3 l1fS 38.'ot>g2 n es 39.nc3 ~d7 40.l:tc7 · ~cS 41.i.g4 ' <MS .42.''''g3 a5 43.i.h5 l:taS 44~f7 a4 45.bxa4 · l:!xa4 46.Ji..xeS Yi.eS 47.l1xb7 l1a3 4S.n b4 Ji..h5 49..b d5 ~xf3 50ixf3 l:!d3 51.d5 ~e5+ 52.~g2 l:td2 53,~1 ~d4 54..te2 . ' ~c5 55..l:tb5 .td4 56.n b3 w e7 57JU3 <j;>d6 5S.l:tf5 .tc5 59.g6 .id4 . 60.1:I.f7 l1a2 61 •.tg4 ~xd5 62.l:!d7+ ' <;t>c5 63J1xd4 ~xd4 64.g7 , 1-0
Sicilian Defence - Pin Variation
fore this, players had responded automatically with 6 .~d3. 6. ... ttJf6-d5 The alternatives are inferior. However, the kingside weakness (g7) is more significant than the doubled pawn on c3 and there are two ways White can gain a good advantage.
Sicilian Defence Pin Variation 1.e4 c5
2 .r~ t3
4':1 xd4 t. It6
e6 3.d4 cxd4 5. ~ ,c3
j:,b4
A) 7. il.c1-d 2 The solid approach.
f. ;
: .: ,
,
...
.\
This is a direct, but not completely sound attempt to immediately attack the e4--pawn. Played by Owen and Bird as far back as the second half of the 19th century, this variation has always been viewed with a certain suspicion. It had a brief revival in the 197 Os, when it was played with a new idea: an exchange sacrifice. However, it was soon discovered that White gains a concrete advantage with correct play, and the variation returned to obscurity. However, it can be a valid surprise weapon: indeed, if White is unaware of the correct antidote, he can easily lose his way in the ensuing complications. 6. e4-e5! The only move that can give Black a headache. It is a strange fact that the effectiveness of this move was not appreciated until the 1930s: for decades be-
7.
ttJd5xc3
8. b2xc3 9.
~b4-e7
~d1-g4
0-0 10. SLd2-h6 g7-g6 11. h2-h4! White refuses to take the bait and he continues to attack with excellent chances. B) 7. ~d1-g4 The aggressive approach.
263
Chess Openin8 Essentials - Volume J •
7. ... O-O!? and here is the exchange sacrifice we mentioned before S. ~c1-h6 g7-gS 9. ~g4-g3! The new idea is not to immediately accept the exchange sacrifice, in order to better exploit the weakness in Black's kingside position,
N'
•. "
'21.'tlf'xgS+ WdS 22.1'1hS . lllcS '23.'iYgS+ It>cS 24.l:tb1 bS 2S ...te3+ "tl:ld4 2S.i.xd4+ exd4 27:itfS+ wc4 . 2S:ij'gS+ ' IiitcS 29.l:!.xbS+. wxbS ;30.'iVdS+ 'illf'cs 31.a4+ . -.1-0 ' ','
DelRio Angelis,Salvador Gabriel , Sulskis,Sarunas Port Erin 2003 (5)
~\,
,
_.
1.e4 cS 2.lllf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lllxd4 '.':; '.;" lbf6 S.4:lc3 ..tb4 6.e5 ltJd5 7.~d2 Taubenhaus,Jean ""~ .~ Schlechter, Carl lllxc3 S.bxc3 ~aS 9..!ld3 dS 10.f4 dxeS 11.fxeS "VifIc7 12.0-0 .bc3 Ostend 1905 (8) , 1.e4 cS 2.lllf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lllxd4 13.~xc3 iYxc314.lllbS ~cS+ ti.JfS S.tl:lc3 ~b4 s.Ad3 tl:lcS [6 .. ,eS 1S.wh1 0-0 1S.llldS 'ii'xeS 17.lllxf7 1:txf7 1S.~xh7+ <;t>xh7 19J:£xf7 It>gS . 7.tl:le2 tl:lc6 8..td2 d6 9 .0-0 ~e6 JO,a3 20.J:!.e7 ~d7 21.ttbL ..tcS 22:ii'g4 .1aS 11..Ilel h6 12.f4 ~b6+ J3.Whl lllg4 14,l:I.fl lllxh2t Gri.inw~ld-Meister, llld7 23.l:!.xeS 'iVc3 24J:£e7 lllfS Berlin 2006] 7..lte3 dS S.lllxc6 bxcS " 2S.J:td1 J:teS 2S.l:!.xeS h eS 27.'iff3 ' 9.eS tLid7 10:~'g4 ~fS 11.f4 .abS ' 'i!fxf3 , 2S.gxf3 tLieS 29.Wg2 '; <;t>f7 30.~f2 wfS 31.We3 gS 32J4b1 ~cS 12.llld1 gS ' 13.h4 hS 14.~e2 ti.JcS 1S.c3 lllxd3+1S.~xd3 cS 17.l'Ve2 33J%b4 tLlf4 34Jlc4 ~eS 3S.wf2 ~e71S.tLif2 "(WaS 19.'ii'c2 .!laS 20.a4 it.dS 3S.1:184 as 37.a3 ~cS 3SJ1aS+ WfS 21.g3 ~bS 22.b4 d4 23.bxcS MS 39J:tcS , ti.Jh3+ 40.we3 , weS .bcli 24.ii.c1 Wg72S.tl:le4 'ifcS 0-1 . 4Utc4 ,tl:lf4 42.ttd4 a5 43.l:tdS a4 44.11gS <;t>fS 4S.J:US+ ~g7 4S.11cS . Wagman,Stuart " ti.Jg2+. ' 47.~f2 tl:lh4 4S.~g3 .bt3" Barle,Janez 49.c3 i!-cS 50J~aS tl:lgS 0-1 Biel1981
1.e4 cS 2.lllf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLixd4 Lalic,Bogdan Sulava,Nenad tLlfS S.lllc3 ~b4 S.eS tLldS [6...'iWcn 7,exf6 h c3+ 8.bxc3 'iWxc3+ 9.'(Wd2 Pula 1997 (9) " 'iWxa 1 10.c3 "iWb J l1.fxg7 'il'e4+ 1.e4 cS 2.tl:lf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.ti.Jxd4 12.~e2 , J:!.g8 J3 .tl:lb5 ' '/Wxg2 14.11fl tl:lfS S.tl:lc3 .ltb4 S.eS llldS 7.~d2 lllxc3 S.bxc3 ~e7 9.'i1i'g4 0-0 llla6 IS .tZld6+ Iiitd8 J6. ~d4 b6 17.'iWf6+ ~c7 18.tZlbS+ 1-0 Pavlovic.. ,", 10..ii.hS gS 11.h4 dS [1l...'i\ta5 Petrovic, Belgrade 2006] 7.i&.d2 lllxc3 . 12.'iYg3 d6 13.tLibs tZld7 t4.hS tZlxeS S.bxc3 i.aS 9:~'g4 0-0 10.i&.d3 dS 1S.f4 .ii.d7 16.fxeS i.xbS ' 17.ii.xbS 11.tl:lf3 gS 12.h4 dxeS 13.hS fS l'kxbS 18.hfS Czarnota-Sulskis, War14.ii.xfS exfS 1S.'(Wc4+ l:tf71S.hxgS saw Ech200S (1-0, 68)] 12.hS 'ii'aS hxgS 17.lllgS Wic7 1s:iVh4 ~S 13.tZlbS as 14.hxgS fxgS 1S.~xfS 19.tZlxf7 'i£(xf7 20."fNh7+ ~eS .1xfS1S.1'1xh7 1-0 264
Sicilian Defence - Kan Variation
Sicilian Defence Kan Variation 1.c4 c5 2 ...'2. f3 c6 3 .d4 cxd4 4. !; ,xd4 a6
so it was natural that until the 1960s opening theory would include their contributions within the Paulsen Variation. However, as theory developed each variation acquired its own name, even if this is not consistently observed by opening manuals. After I.e4 c5 2.t2:lf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.t2:lxd4, we will use the following names: 4 ... a6 - Kan Variation; 4 ... t2:lc6 - Paulsen-Taimanov; 4 ... t2:lc6 5.t2:lc3 a6 6 .~e2 ttlge7 Taimanov (in the strict sense); 4 ... t2:lc6 5. t2:lc3 a6 6 .~e2 "'c7 Paulsen (in the strict sense).
The move sequence l.e4 c5 2.t2:lf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.t2:lxd4 a6 leads to one of the oldest positions in the Sicilian Defence. It was used in several of Adolf Anderssen's games in the middle part of the 19th century, and by Louis Paulsen towards the end of the same century. However, it only started to become popular from the beginning of the 195 Os onwards, due to good results achieved by the Soviet player Ilya Kan. It is statistically one of the best lines for Black in the Sicilian. Though this is in part a comment on its objective worth, it also reflects the fact that the Kan is greatly appreciated by strong players, who find its flexibility attractive. There is sometimes a little confusion about the nomenclature of the 'sister' Taimanov and Paulsen variations, in part because of possible transpositions. Both Kan and Mark Taimanov were more recent players than Paulsen, and
From what we have said so far, you will now realize how subtle the distinctions are. For example, when playing the Kan, Black only needs to play ... t2:lc6 and he will suddenly find himself in the Paulsen-Taimanov variation. It is interesting to know that in the past the Paulsen Variation used to be reached almost exclusively via the Kan (4 ... a6) . Nowadays, black players more commonly prefer to reach the Paulsen through 4 ... t2:lc6. This trend is also because modern players, who are wellversed in the intricacies of the Kan, like to develop the b8-knight to c6. Otherwise, its placement there is delayed. To make matters even more confusing, it should be remembered that when Black plays ... d6 (either after 4 ... a6 or after 4 ... t2:lc6 5 .t2:lc3) and develops the bishop to e7, he transposes to the Scheveningen Variation. This is something that happens often, as in this way Black avoids the dangers associated with the Keres Attack. 265
Chess Openina Essentials - Volume I We will consider S. ~d3 to be the main line of the Kan. Before we look at it, we will examine the alternatives: A) 5. c2-c4 Adopting the Mar6czy Bind pawn formation, as in the Kalashnikov, the Anti-Taimanov and the Accelerated Dragon.
5. ttlb1-c3 B) This tends to lead to positions found in the Paulsen-Taimanov Variation where every now and then Black plays S... ttlc6 . However, if Black wants to remain in the orbit of the Kan, he can play the completely re-evaluated 5. ... b7-b5 In old opening books this was considered doubtful because of 6. it.f1-d3!
.J
Now the advance ... d7-dS by Black will prove to be difficult. At first, this was considered to be a sort of positional refutation of the Kan. However, today it is not viewed with fear: Black can respond directly with S ... ttlf6 and then 6.ttlc3 ~b4, which produces tactically complex play. This is particularly the case in the variation 7 . ~d3 ttlc6 8.ttlxc6 dxc6 9 .eS ~aS 10 .exf6 ~xc3 +, where White's initiative used to be seen as very promising. However, in reality Black has more than sufficient resources. Also good is the solid 6 ... ~c7, which controls eS and creates a typical Hedgehog Defence formation (this variation acquired its name because the e6-d6-b6-a6 pawn formation reminded players of the thorny spines of a hedgehog). This variation is willingly used by modern players who are unconcerned by White's space advantage. 266
However, in fact after 6 ... 'i\Vb6 - a recent move that is very fashionable - or 6 ... d6, Black's results have been acceptable. However, the classical S.. .~c7 is also playable. 5. ~f1-d3 C) The principal move of the Kan Variation.
Sicilian Defence - Kan Variation
This is not such a natural-looking move; generally we are advised to place the bishops on open diagonals. However, in this case there are many advantages that come with this move. Substantially, it is a question of timing: by defending the e4-pawn with the bishop, White postpones the development of the knight to c3, to reserve the option of c2-c4 for a more opportune moment than the 5 th move. Nonetheless, this flexible developing move allows White, if he wants, to still develop the knight to c3, transposing to common variations of the Scheveningen in which the d3-bishop can become a threat after pawn advances to f4 and e5. Moreover, in some variations the white queen - unobstructed by a bishop on e2 - can relocate directly to the kingside. After 5.~d3, Black has an ample choice of moves besides 5 .. .d6, which is one of many ways to transpose to the Scheveningen Variation. Some of the available moves are: 5 ... b5, 5 ... b6, 5 ... tOe7 or even 5 ... d5, which until not long ago was considered to be premature. However, the most popular are the follOwing:
C3) 5 .... tOb8-c6 is the classical continuation. Now it is seen more rarely, but this is only a question offashion. C4)
5 ....
g7-g6
Here a student could protest, 'But doesn't everybody say that with an e6-d7 pawn structure you shouldn't advance the pawn to g6, as it creates ugly weaknesses on d6 and f6?' This is true, but as always, general principles must be considered in the context of each particular case. Here, the weakness in question is not easy to exploit, since the d3 -bishop obstructs the d-file. In addition, the move ... ~g7 will gain a tempo by attacking the undefended knight on d4. C5)
5 ....
ttlg8-f6
C1) jLf8-c5 5. To try to exploit the presence of the undefended d4-knight by attacking it immediately, and after 6.tOb3, retreating the bishop to a7 or e7. C2) 'iWd8-b6 5 .... This is all the rage with Sicilian players at the moment. The resulting pOSitions are still largely unexplored.
267
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 The most popular move at the moment, taking advantage of White's inability to advance the pawn to eS because of 6 .. .'l!VaS+ followed by 7 .. .'~xeS. After 6.0 -0 (threatening 7.eS), you continue with 6 .. .'i i'c7 or 6 ... d6 to establish a classic Hedgehog formation in the event that White plays c2-c4.
l:ta2 2S.'ifr>g3 <;tofS 29.wf3 we7 30.g4 f5 31.gxf5 fS 32 ..!i!.gS hS 33.'i;f;>g3 'wdS 34.wf3 I:ta1 35.cJtg2 ~e5 ' 36.ileS Wf4 37...td7 t!b1 3S.i.eS llb2 39.A e4 l:ra2 40..teS h5 4UI.d7 0-1
De la Paz,Frank MiIov,Vadim ~Morelia
Ehlvest,Jaan Kasparov,Garry Linares 1991 (I 0)
1.e4 e5 VLlf3 e6 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 a6 5.e4 lLlf6 6.lLle3 Wile7 7.~d3 ile7 S.f4 d6 9.'ti'e2 lLle6 10.lLlf3 lLld7 11.83 ~f6 12.~e3 he3+ 13.bxe3 e5 14.f5 lLlebS 15.0-0 lLle5 1S.i.e2 lLlbd7 17.tlfd1 lLlfS 1S.lLld2 .liLd7 19.~g5 .\te6 20.Wilf3 0-0-0 21J:te1 , hS 22.~h4 J:ldgS . 23.Wh1 lLlfd7 24.lLlf1 g5 25..tf2 h5 26.W!id1 h4 27.Wilb1 lLlf6 2S..be5 dxe5 29.lLle3 'ilfa5 30.'ti'b2 h3 31.g3lLlxe4 32 ..be4 ~xe4+ 33.Wg1 l:tdS 34.lLlg4 .bf5 35.tLlxe5 Wie7 3S.Wilf2 ~ e6 37.tIab1 l:td6 3S.l:tb2 trhdS 39Jlbe2 f6 40.lLlg6 be4 . 0-1
Spassky,Boris Fischer,Robert Reykjavik Wch m 1972 (21)
1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 a6 5.tLle3 lLleS 6.~e3 lLlf6 7..lkd3 d5 S.exd5 exd5 , 9.0-0 ~d6 10.tLlxeS bxe6 11 ..!i!.d4 0-0 12.'tWf3 i.eS 13.l:!.fe1 e5 14..bfS " xf6 15.'iWxfS gxfS 1SJlad1 l1fdS 17.i.e2 l':tabS 1S.b3 c4 ,. 19.tLlxd5 hd5 20.l:bd5 .txh2+ 21.<.ttxh2 ttxd5 22 ..he4 J:i:d2 23 ..!i!.xaS Uxe2 24.l:te2 J:1xe2 25..be2 l:tdS 26.a4 J:1d2 27.£i.e4 268
2007 (3)
1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 eS 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 as 5.~d3 tLle7 S.O-O tLlbeS 7.~e3 lLlxd4 S..bd4 lLleS 9.i.e3 b5 10.a3 e511.lLld2 dS12.b4 Jle713.a411bS 14.axb5 axb5 15.tLlb3 0-0 16.lLla5 'fIe7 17.ild2 JleS 1S.e3 d5 19.~e2 J:tfdS 20.~xb5 ttJxa5 21 JIxa5 dxe4 22.c4 J:1xb5 23.exb5 Wile2 24.l:tc1 'ti'b2 25:~*,e1 .l:Ixd2 2S.J:!.aS+ £i.fS 27J.1b1 fid4 2S.b6 il.d5 29.J:1aa1 l:td330.b5 hS 31.h3 e3 32.fxe3 ttxe3 0-1
Sulskis,Sarunas Hansen, Sune Berg Calvia 01 2004 (12)
1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 e6 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 as 5.Ad3 ile5 6.e3 dS 7.0-0 ,lLlf6 S:~'e2 e5 9.lLlf3 £i.eS 10.h3 h6 1Ul d1 'fIe7 12.tLlbd2 0-0 13.lLlf1 lLle6 14.tLlg3 d5 15.~xh6 dxe4 16.'iWd2 exd3 17..b g7lLlh7 1S.ttlh5 fS 19:i}'h6 e4 . 20.il.xfS l:txfS 21.'ti'g6+ 'if;hS 22:~'xe4 ~f7 23.1Wh4 tbe5 24.tLlxe5 fxe5 25.J:l.xd3 .b h5 2S:~fxh5 .hf2+ 27.wh1 e4 2S.l:1d5 'f{{f7 29.'iWe5+ ttlfS 30Jlad1 e3 31.l:.dS r:txdS 32Jl xdS+ wg7 33.g4 'iWg6 34.'if;g2 'iYe4+ 35.'ifxe4 tLlxe4 3S.l:i:eS e2 37.11xe4 e1 'tW 3S.J:l.xe1 ~xe1 39.>I;>f3 >l;>fS 40.We4
Sicilian Defence - Kan Variation ,'"
' We6 41.a4 as 42 ...t'd4 i.h4 43.WcS ' l·.idS 44.b4 axb4 4S.cxb4 Wd7 46.aS :..te7+ 47.Wc4 ..tdS .48.WdS
?
.Anand, Viswanathan , Svidler,Peter Cap d'Agde rapid 2003(2)
1.e4 cS 2.lt:lf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tZlxd4 a6 5•.td3 ~c5 6.~b3 , .b 7 7.0-0 tZlc6 S.tZlc3 tZlf6 9.'fie2 d6 10...te3 b5 11 ..ba7 1:[xa7 12.'ilfe3 0-0 13.l:tfd1 1:[d7 14.h3 .1I.b7 15.a4 b4 ~ 16.tZle2 •'fIic7 17.aS J:[cS 1S.tLled4 'tZle5 19.~e2 tLlc4 20.J:[dc1 . eS 21.tZlfS d5 22.exd5 il.xd5 23.tZld2 tLlxd2 24.'i!fxd2 .tLle4 25:i!i'xb4 tZlc5 26 •..tf1 .te6 27.tZle3 ".t[d4 2S."Wb6 ,1Wxb6 29.axb6 tIb4 30..ixa6 tZlxa6 3Uba6 J:txb2 32.c4 hS 33.c5 .:l.b5 ' 34.c6 1-0
,,.. .....
11.tZlxe4 tbdS 12.tLlxc6 ,tZlxe3 , 13.tZlf6+ .bf6 14..txh7+ wxh7 15.'i!fhS+ wgS ", 16.tLlxdS tZlxf1 17.tLlxf7 J:txf7 1S..t[xf1 , ~d7 ,19.l:i.f3 1:[afS 20.J:lh3 g5 21.1:[g3 .tdS 22Jbg5+ .bg5 23.'i*'xgS+ J:tg7 24.'i!feS u'g6 2S.'fie4J:Igf6 26.g3 .tc6 27.'Wd3 nSf7 : 28.~dS+ 'oiIh 7 29.~d3+<J;;g7 30.'i\¥e3 J:%.d7 31.c4 J:ld1+32.Wf2 J:th1 33.'fieSJ:txh2+ 34.We3 " J:lg2 35.'*'g5+ Wf7 36.~h5+ J:ig6 37.'i\¥h7+ · ng7 3S.1VhS+ WgS 3Ulfe5 n2xg3+ 40.Wd4ll3g6 41.b4 1lf7 42.b5 axbS 43.cxbS i.d5 44.a4 :g4 , 45,c.pe3 ,J:tfxf4 46.'i!I'bS+ rus 47.'iYd6 nf3+ 0-1
. Byrne,Robert Andersson, Ulf AmsterdamlBM 1979 ( 12)
1.e4 c5 2.tZlf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 : NakanlUxa,Hikaru a6 5 ...td3 96 6.b3 d6 7.0-0 ~g7 Epishin,Vladimir S.~b2 tLlf6 9.c40-0 10.tZlc3 tZlbd7 11.J:[e1 treS 12..itf1 b6 13.'f!id2 i.b7 Gibraltar 2007 (7) 1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 . 14.l:I.ad1 Wlc7 15.f3 nadS 16.'iYf2 a6 S.~d3 ..tcS 6.tZlb3 ..te7 7.~e3 dS , tZle5 17.l:I.c1 d5 1S.exdS [18.cxdS S.exdS 'i*'xd5 9.tZlc3 1Wxg2 10.~e4 tLlfg+ 19.1i'g3 tLld3!! 20.'iVxc7 ..txd4+ 'fIih3 11.'iVd4 tZlf6 12.0-0-0 tLlbd7 21. Wh 1 tLldf2 + 22. Wg 1 tZlh3+ .13.11hg1 g614.J:tg3 fih51S ..tg5 h6 23.'i!i'hl tZlgf2X] 1S...tZlfg4 19.'iI¥g3 .16.jLf3 'i'ixh2 17..1I.e3 eS 1S.'iYa4 e4 tZlxf3+ ," 20.gxf3 [20 .tLlxn 1wcS+] : 19.tZlxe4 tZlxe4 , 20•.b e4 'iYh4 20....bd4+ 21.Wh1 1i'xg3 22.hxg3 21.tZlc5 b5 22.f:t'd4 ' ..tf6 23.'i!fdS tLle3-+ 23.i.d3 exd5 24.cxd5 tZlxcs 24•.bcS '. 1-0 tZlxd5 25.J:txeS+ J:txeS 26 ..te4 .bc3 27..bc3 tZlxc3 2S...txb7tZlxa2 , Taubenhaus,Jean 29.l:I.c6 a5 30.llxb6 U,bS 31.<Ji>g2 <J;;fS 32.llb5 tZlb4 " 33.Wf2 'i!i'e7 Tarrasch,Siegbert 34.'oiIe3 wd6 3S,<.pd4 "Wc7 36.J:txb4 Ostend 1905 (IS) 1.e4 cS 2.tZlf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 axb4 37...tdS wd6 •3S...txf7 1:fS 39•..td5 J:l.fS 40...te4 11g5 41.g4 hS ' a6 5.~d3ttc6 6.c3 tZlf6 7.~e3 dS 0-1 S.tZld2 ..te7 9.0-0 ,0-0 10.f4 dxe4 269
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Sicilian Defence Paulsen-Taimanov 1.e4 c5 2.·Sf3 ~6 3.d4 cxd4 4 .~', xd4..'4
c6
On the minus side, Black can no longer flexibly develop the b8-knight to d7, as is the case in many Sicilian variations. Black does not control the b5 -square, because he has not played ... a6. So the first continuation that will be examined is 5.tDb5, which some refer to as the Anti-Taimanov Variation. This is not as popular as it once was (for example, it was one of Fischer's favourites). However, it remains one of White's main lines; the second being 5 .tDc3. A)
~
5. ttJd4-b5
d7-dG
.. .<
-.,'
,.'
It should be stressed that you can reach the same position with the move order l.e4 c5 2.tDf3 tDc6 3.M cxd4 4.tDxd4 e6. Every opening has its good and bad points. Compared to the Kan, the positive feature here is that since d4 is controlled by the tDc6, the most unpleasant move 5 . ~d3 becomes impossible. Moreover, the move 5.c4 loses a lot of its effectiveness here, as after 5 ...tDf6 6.tDc3 ~b 4, White's centre is already under pressure. Another reason why the PaulsenTaimanov Variation is so popular is that Black always has the option of ...d7 -d6 in the main lines. In this way he can transpose to the Scheveningen Variation, having avoided the dangerous Keres and English Attacks, which can be so formidable against the standard Scheveningen. 270
Now there are two continuations for White: 6.c4 and 6. ~f4 . A1)
G. c2-c4
Bringing about the classic Mar6czy Bind pawn formation (pawns on e4 and c4)
Sicilian Defence - Paulsen- Taimanov and Black responds by taking up the Hedgehog Defence pawn formation. It is true that White loses time with the manoeuvre lLld4-bS-c3 (or a3) in comparison to sister systems that are brought about by the English Opening, the Sicilian Kan Variation, or the Queen's Indian Defence. However, it is not uncommon for Black to move the knight from c6 to d7 by way of b8! As you will have noted, the slow manoeuvring style of play which is typical of these variations, is the appropriate way to handle all Hedgehog-like formations, even if they are produced by different openings. It is only when White attacks b6 with ~e3 and ~b3 that the variations have their own specific features. The importance of White's space advantage was overestimated in the past. In practice, Black's position has proved to be difficult to attack; either with gradual manoeuvres, where White maintains his space advantage; or with aggressive attempts in which White tries to attack Black's king with his f and g-pawns. In response to the latter approach, Black's usual counter-measure is an opportune pawn advance ... dS. If White plays g2-g4, the manoeuvre .. .h6, ... lLlh7 and ... gS is also effective. When White plays the more solid f2-D and takes counter-measures against Black's ... dS pawn break with Whl and ~f1, Black has the interesting sequence ...~e7-d8-c7; or, alternatively, ... Wh8, ... .bIg8 and then ... gS-g4 to undermine the white pawn chain. A2) 6. ~c1-f4 This is a more direct approach.
e6-e5 6 .... 7. J1l.f4-e3 We have reached a position which is very reminiscent of the Lasker-Pelikan Variation, which can also be reached by means of the Kalashnikov (but with one move less for both players!). But White's most frequent choice remains the natural developing move: B)
5. tDb1-c3
By S... d6 Black can now transpose to standard lines of the Scheveningen in which he has not yet developed his king's knight. Not moving the knight could be advisable, as you can avoid several dangerous continuations by White. At this point it makes virtually no difference in which order Black plays ... a6 and ... VIIi c7. However, the most common first move is 271
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume a7-a6 5 .... It is worth noting some popular alter-
native lines for White (regardless of in which order ... a6 and .. ."VIIic7 are played): 6 .~e2, which remains the most frequently played, as well as the more recent 6 ..lil.e3. 81)
6. ttJd4xc6
This is only usual in response to 5 ... a6. 6.
b7xc6
7. ~f1-d3
The position produced is different from what you usually find in the Sicilian Defence. Black's centre is reinforced and there is no longer a knight on d4, which is so unpleasant for Black in the Sicilian. However, in compensation White can develop his pieces in an natural and active fashion. Moreover, the move ...a6 proves to be pointless and the bishop on c8 is not a pretty sight. In short, virtues and defects compensate for each other, but the relative novelty of the line is appealing to those players who are attracted to territory which is still theoretically unexplored. 82) 6. g2-g3 Another variation that is employed quite a lot by white players. 272
It prepares for a kingside fianchetto (as mentioned, in response to either 5 ... a6 or to 5 .. .'iVc 7). In the other Sicilian variations this indicates White's desire for a quiet game that avoids the critical lines. However, here the fianchetto contains a drop of poison: the e4-pawn, which is often under pressure in the Paulsen, is now well protected, the g2-bishop bears down on the queenside, and at times tactical m otifs centred on J:[e I and the sacrificial move ttJd5 are pOSSible. The game becomes fundamentally positional in nature, but current theoretical assessments give White a small but unpleasant initiative. Indeed, so much so, that probably the best option for Black is to play d7 -d6 on the 7th move (after protecting the c6-square well with 6 .. .'VJlic7 - if this has been played on the 5th move, now 6 ... a6 is required to avoid the irritating move ttJdb5) , transposing to a Scheveningen variation that should not cause Black great problems. \'WdS-c7 6. ~c1-e3 7. ~d1-d2 ttJgS-f6 S. f2-f3 This variation, running along the lines of the English Attack, has recently become more popular.
83)
Sicilian Defence - Paulsen- Taimanov
White plans for the usual kingside expansion. Given that Black can still play .....IiLb4 and seek counterplay in the centre with ... d7 -dS, it has always been thought that the second player has easy counterplay. However, things are not so simple and White's initiative remains dangerous. B4) 6. ~f1-e2 1bis classical move remains the main line.
Instead of 6 ... '{Wc7, Black can continue with the Taimanov Variation in the strict sense of the term, by playing 6 .. .lLlge7, with the aim of exchanging on d4 and bringing out the white queen, in order to gain a tempo with ... lLlc6. Therefore White avoids the exchange with 7.lLlb3, which has come to be seen as the main line. 7 ...b5 8.i.e3 lLlg6 9.0-0 i.e7 10.a4 b4 Il.aS! (threatening 12 ...IiLb6) Il...J:[ b8 12.lLla4
with a slight edge for White. 6. ... ~dS-c7 The classical move, controlling eS and preparing ...lLlf6. 7. 0-0 lLlgS-f6 S. ~c1-e3 Now we are in the key position of the Paulsen, in which Black can put White's centre under pressure with 8 ... bS or the more commonly played S. ... ~fS-b4 From a statistical point of view, 8 .. .i.b4 is one of Black's most trustworthy options. This should come as no surprise, since if White proceeds mechanically h e can easily find himself in difficulty. Therefore White's best move - unless of course you already know what it is - is not very easy to find: 9. lLlc3-a4!
A curious m ove: it decentralizes the knight and leaves the e4-pawn unde273
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
fended. Now 9 ... tLlxe4?! is weak because of 10.tLlxc6 followed by 11. tLlb 6 and 12.'iiVd4. ~ b4-e7 9 .... By pulling back the bishop, the threat of ... ttJxe4 becomes more powerful. Also playable is the old 9 ... 0-0 10.ttJxc6 bxc6 II. ttJb6 .l:[b8 12.ttJxc8 Jafxc8 13.iLxa6, and after lL .J:d8 or 13 .. JH8, Black regains the pawn because of the weaknesses on e4, b2 and h2, with an uncertain game. 10. ttJd4xe6 b7xe6 11. ttJa4-b6 ~ a8-b8 12. ttJb6xe8 ~c7xe8 Unlike the analogous variation with 9... 0-0, the bishop is not on b4. Now that b2 is under attack, Black can allow e4-e5. tLlf6-d5 13. e4-e5 14. iLe3-e1
iLe7-e5
15. e2-e4 tLld5-e7 16. b2-b3 ~e8-e7 17. iLe1-b2 Black's position is cramped but playable. It should be remembered that Black can always transpose to the Scheveningen with 8... .ie7 or 8 ...d6,
Almasi,Zoltan Ivanchuk, Vasily Polanica Zdroj 2000 (~)
~ . Macieja,Bartlo~iej ; ,Rublevsky,Sergey
, Karpov,Anatoly""'" ~asparoV;Garry
',"" .
,,..
·1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 tLle6 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 e6 5.tLlbS d6 6.~f4 eS 7.i1.e3 tLlfG [7 .. .f5? 8,tLllc3! f4 9.tLldS! fxe3 :JO.tLlbc7+Wf7 1 t.~f.HtLlf6 12.J£.c4 ' ·tLld4! 13.tLlxf6+ dS 14..L:dS+ rJ;>g6? 15.W!I'h5+ >t>xf6 16.fxe3 tLlxcH 17.We2 1-0 Morphy -Anderssen, Paris 1858 - thiS; modem line was already played 150 years ~ ago!) 8 ..tgS as 9.tLl5c311..e710.tLld2?! ' '[lO,il.xf6!?] 10...1I..g4 1Ut e2 .be2 , ,12.tLlxe2 d5= 13.~xf6 1t.xf6 14.0-0 , '0-0 1S.c4 dxe416.tLlxe4 ~e717.eS?! ;'1}Jfe7 18.'iI'b3 ..trad8 19.1:tfd1 g6 • 20.~c4 tba5 21.'ifb4 rJ;>g7 22.tLl2e3?! , tLle6 23.'i'c4 fS 24.tLld6 .bd6 : · 2S.exd6 l:txd6 26.J:txd6 ~xd6 27.lld1 ~ ; tbd4 28.14 bS 29.'ifd3 J:td8 30.'WPh1 ; ; b4 31.tLle2 tLlbS! 32.'iYxd6 UxdS 33J:txdS tLlxd6 34.fxeS tZlc4 , 3S.b3 ,tLlxeS 3S.tLlf4 'as 37.h4~S '38.Wg1 ; lbg4 39.tLld3 We6':"'+ 40.tt:lcS+ >itdS! ~41.lbb7+ we7 ', 0-1 ,\,
Rethymnon tt 2003 (7) '"
'1 <,
ti
"
,1.e4 eS 2.lbf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lbxd4 ' Moscow'Weh m 1984 (3) ., tLlcS S.tLlbS dS SJit.f4 eS 7.~e3 as ; 1.e4 eS 2.lllf3 eS 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 8.tLl5c3 tbf6 9.iLc4 £ eS ,10.tLldS tLlc6 S.tbb5 dS S.c4 lbfS 7.tLl1c3 a6 tLlxe4 11.$..bS 'iVg5 12.tLle7+. Wd7~ 8.lba3 $..e7 9.1I..e2 0-0 ,10.0-0 b6 13.i.xe6+ fxe6 14.tLlxa8 'iWxg2 : :11 ..1t.e3 1I..b7 12.'iYb3 lba5 13.'i!'xb6 1SJ:If1 iLe7 16.tLld2 ' Uxa8 H.e3 ' tLlxe414.tLlxe4 ..IVce41SJi'xd8 .bd8 , tLlxd2 '18.'iYxd2 'iVxh2 19.0-0-0 ~f4 1 16.J:lad1 d5 17.f3 Ji.fS 18.cxdS exdS 20.il.e3 'fi'f5 21.1:191 96 ' 22.f4 e4 ; 19.1:txdS Jt.eS 20.ndS .ba2 21.l:txa6 23J.lg3 nf8 24.1:(gS 'iff7 2SJ:tg3 dS · J:rb8 22.iLc5 .:te8 23Jl.b5 n eS 24.b4 2S.It>b1 wc8 27.J:th1 il.dS2.8.l:thS : tLlb7 2S.iH2 iLe7 26.tbe2 iLdS Wie7 29.Ugh3 l:tf7 30.J:th1 iLf8 : 27JM1 il.b3 28.l:td7 tId8 29.J:i.xe6 31JISh2 wbS 32.Wig2 ~d6 33.Wig4 1:txd730.11e1 1ae731 ...ltb6 ",.". 1-0 ."". 'ii'd7 34.l1h6 $..f8 , 3SJlSh3 ,. tLlaS , 274
Sicilian Defence - Paulsen - Taimanov
.
,
36.b3 lLle6 37.'ii'g1 ~d6 3S.l:lh6 ~fS 39.I16h3 ~aS 40.1Wg2 ~d6 4Uth6 e5 42.fxe5 lLlxe5 43.l:td1 lLld3 44i d4 ~f4 45.l:.h3 'ilff5 46Jm ,*,e6 ' 47.'lIt'h1 h5 4S.'ii'g2 trf5 49.l::thh1 e3 50.'i'e2 ~e4 51.c;!;>a1 lLlb4 52.c;!;>b2 lLle6 53 ..ltb6 J:tfS 54.l::th3 'ueS 55.'ud1 Ile6 56..te5 C;!;>bS ~ 57.J:Id3 ,lLle5 5S.l::tdxe3 ~xe3 59.,Uxe3 ~f5 60.~d4 lLld3+ 6UVxd3 ~xd3 62 •.I:I:xd3 g5 63.,Ue3 n g6 64J1eS+ c;!;>e765..1'l hS h4 66.l::th5 C;!;> d6 67.~e3 94 68.'uxh4 g3 69.l:th6 1-0
Fischer,Robert '" Tal,Mikhail Bled 196i (2)
' ~"
lLlf6 S.~e3 b5 9.lLlxe6 dxe6 10.f4 b4 11.e5 lLld5 12.lLlxd5 exd5 13.~d4 'fi'a5 14.a3 bxa3 15.e3 £l..d7 16.b4 't!i'a4 17.£l..d1· jYeS 1SJba3 'li'e4 19.'lWxe4 dxe4 20..if3 1-0
Nisipeanu,Liviu-Dieter De la Riva Aguado,Oscar , Spain tt 2006 (2)
1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 lLle6 3.d4 exd4 4.lLJxd4 eS5.lLle3 jYe7 6.£l..e3 a6 7..ite2 lLlf6 S.O-O it.b4 9.lLla4 0-0 10.lLlxe6 bxe6 11.lLlb6 l::tbS 12.lLlxeS lUxeS 13..ha6 :US 14•.ltd3 ~dS 15.g3 .lte5 1S.a4 i.xb2 17.l::ta2 d5 1S.exd5 lLlxd5 19.i.d2 .tfS 20.a5 l:tfdS 21.a6 lLle3 22 ..b e3 .i.xe3 23.iff3 .ltd4 24..b4 .l:!d6 25 ..l:!d1 "iLa7 26.J:lxdS 't!i'xd6 27..tta1 ~e5 2S.l::td1 jYb6 29J:td7 f5 30.~d3 J:IdS 3Ul b7 'lWe5 32.'. tg2 h6 33.'f!\fe2 hS 34.f4 lld6 35.'it'e5 " ,1-0
1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 lLle6 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 e6 5.lLle3 ~e7 6.g3 lLlf6?1 , 7.lLldb5! 'tWbS S..ltf4 lLle5 9~e2 R.e5 10.ii.xe5 ~xe5 11.f4 ~bS 12.e5 a6 ,13.exf6 axb5 14.fxg7 ~gS 15.lLle4 ' $..e7 16.~d4 l::ta4 17.lLlf6+ .bf6 ·1S.'iWxf6 ~e719.0-0-0 l!xa2 20.c;!;>b1 Efunenko,Zahar l l:ta6 21 ..b b5 l:tb6 22.$..d3 : e5 " Miladinovic,Igor ", Zlatibor tt 2006 (6) ,', 23.fxe5 n xf6 24.exf6 'iYe5 25.~xh7 Wg5 26 ..b gS 'iWxf6 27.l:Ihf1 'iYxg7 . 1.e4 e5 . 2.lLlf3 lLle6 3.d4 exd4 2S•.ltxf7+ · w dS . 29.i.e6 ~h6 , 4.lLlxd4 Wie7 5.lLle3 e6 6.~e2 a6 i 30..ltxd7 .b d7 ' 31.l:tf7 ," 1!Vxh2 7.0-0 lDf6 S..lil.e3 iLb4 9.lt:Ja4 ~e7 ,32.1.1dxd7+ <;teS 33.J:tde7+ dS 10.lLlxeS bxe6 11.lLlb6 ttbS 12.lLlxeS ' 34JI d7+ w eS 35.I:te7+ . dS 'iixeS 13.~d4 ~e714.e5 lLld5 15.b3 !36JUd7+ eS 37.l:td1 b5 3S.l::tb7 a5 16.g3 c5 17..ltb2 a4 1S.A e4 lLlbS 'iWh5 39.g4 ' 'iWh3 40.g5 'il'f3 19•.tb5 e4 20.i.d4 axb3 21.exb3 '41.I:teH ' c;!;>fS 42.l:Xxb5 ~g7 43.I:tb6 exb3 22.1!Vxb3 0-0 23.a4 lLld5 24.a5 ; '/Wg3 44.:td1 Wle7 45..l'~dd6 ; ~eS .ic5 25.J:tae1 il..xd4 2SJ:txe7 lLlxe7 ~46.b3" Wf747.:a6 ' 1-0 27.Wld3lLlxb5 2SJl:b1lLle3 29. ~xbS l::txbS 30.aS lLlb5 31.g2 g6 32.f4 ~ " ,,~ Landa,Konstantin ' .;. <MS 33.g4 34.'i¥h3 lLle3 35.a7 J:l:b2+ 36.'Ot>f1 .l:tb1+ 37.g2 .i:tg1+ Zunker,Reinhard " BadWiessee 2005 (2) 3S.'iM3 h a7 " 39:ifxh7 : f1 + 1.e4 c5 2.lLlf3 e6 3.lLle3lLle6 4.d4 40.iJ.tg2 J:tf2+ 41 ;lth1' ~e5 42.'iYhS+' .tfS 43.Wlh3'lLld5 44.Wlb3 .ltb4 : 0-1 ,exd4 5.lLlxd4.f:fe7 6.~e2 a6 ,7.0-0 "
*e8
275
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Sicilian Defence Four Knights Variation 1.c4 c5 2.!" J3 !:; cS (2 ... eS) 3 .d4 cxd4 4. r, xd4 ~ fS 5 / j c3 e6
paid for this is a reinforced black centre. The following common sequence is indicative of the variation's complexity: 8 ... ~c7 9.f4 '+!fb6! lO.c4 ~b4 + 11.c;t>e2! fs 12.ttJf2 ~a6 13.c;t>f3! ttJe7 14.~e3 ~cS I S . ~xcS 'i!fxcs 16 .~d6
(5 .. Ac6)
This variation has the ECO code B4S , which classifies it as a sub-variation of the PauIsen-Taimanov (4 ... e6 S.ttJc3 ttJf6). In reality, most of the time the position is reached by playing 2...ttJc6 and 4 ... ttJf6 . At the moment the following line is popular: 6.ttJxc6 bxc6 7.eS ttJdS
8.ttJe4, which gains space and fixes the weakness on d6, but the price to be 276
with an unbalanced posmon where both players have chances. However, 6. ttJd4-b5 remains the most logical and it is also the most popular: the weakness on d6 is put under further pressure. The usual reply is 6. ... ilfB-b4
This is the move which defines the Sicilian Four Knights. Naturally, with 6 ... d6 7 .~f4 eS 8 . ~gS you transpose to the Lasker-Pelikan Variation, with an extra move played by both sides.
Sicilian Defence - Four Knights Variation
Given that the thematic 7.liJd6+, as well as 7 .~f4, gives Black good counterplay, the most frequent move by far has become the solid 7. a2-a3 White contents himself with the small advantage of the two bishops. The game becomes a slow positional struggle after 7.... i.b4xc3+ S. lLlb5xc3 d7-d5 Black opens the position after conceding the two bishops to White, in order to free his game 9. e4xd5 e6xd5
Therefore, on the whole, this variation is good for a Black player who is happy to draw. If Black wants to fight for the full pOint, then the percentage of victories for Black (10%) is certainly not encouraging. This is particularly clear when it is compared to the overall win rate of 29 % for the SicHian, higher than for any other of Black's defences, and testimony to the Sicilian's combative nature.
"Adams~Michael ' +2' " ,"', '~;"'. " Radjabov, Teimour :, ,; :. '} EnghienlesBains ,2003.(6)
,
1.e4 cS 2.lLlf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4
It is true that Black has a weak pawn on dS and is without his dark-squared bishop. However, after the usual sequence 10. ~fl-d3 0-0 11. 0-0 d5-d4 12. lLlc3-e2 we have a position which is different to the classic isolated d-pawn positions. Here the pawn has advanced to d4. Black has gained a good space advantage and control of the dS-square. White maintains a minimal plus, but it is difficult to gain anything concrete, as is apparent from the unusually high draw rate.
'liJ16 S;liJc3, liJc6 , 6.lLlxc6 bxc6 ' 7.eS lliJdS S.tZle.. 'ilfc7 9.f4 Ub8?110~d3 :'ilfb6 11.Vi'e2 .te7N 12.c4?1 JLb4+? ![lLJS!}'.13.Wf1 f5 14.exf6 liJxf6o' 1S.lLlxf6+! gif6 16..te3;t 'ilfaS?! :17.'M2 ~e71S.c5' dS19.cxd6 bd6 !20.Uhd1± / 9;;e7 '· 21.wg1 .tcS : 22.~xc5+ 'iixcS+ 23.wh1 1Vb4?! '24.1i"e3, '1i"a5 25.b3 iLd7 26..tc4' tl1b<:1S 27..I:[e1+- "b6 ,. 28.'ilfg3 ,l1dg829.1Vh3 .1-0, •
"
,
.'
"..
''-;';'~.
,:' Anderssen,Adolf , ,. '~ Paulsent Louis .... ~
A ~
';' ":1
!
: Leipiigm 1876 (1) ' • ~," ! :1.e4 c5 , 2.lLlf3 ,e6 3.liJc3 tZlc6 4.d4' 'cxd4 S.tZlxd4 lLlf6 6.lLldb5 iLb4 7.tZld6+ 9;;e7 8if4 eS 9.tZlf5+ WfS' ;10Ji.g5 d5 11.exd5 'ilfxd5 12.liJe3 '*'85 13.tZlc4 "" iLxc3+ 14.bxc3 ;Wxc3+ 15.iLd2 'ilfd4 ':'16.c3 'ilfe4+ i17.~e3 liJd5 18.f3 1Vh4+ 19i f2 :Vd8 20.'ilfb3 tZlf4 ' 21.Ud1 . Wfe7 22.g3 tZle6 23.il.g2 g6 24.0-0 wg7 2S.Ufe1 Wic7 26.ttd5 16 27.tZld6
277
Chess Opening Essential s - Volum e 1
LUg5 2S.tiJxeS .l:lhxeS 29Jl b5 b6 30.f4 LUf7 31.fxe5 fxe5 32.1:f1 LUd6 ,33 ..b e6 fixe6 34.l:txe5 LUt5 35.g4 f#t3 36.%l e7+ whS 37.gxf5 'iVg4+ 3S.~g3 %:I. e4 39.fxg6 tldS 40:iWxc4 1~ , ~l ;
.' ', .o
~.
Shirov,Alexey Grischuk,Alexander
. ',.
Linares 2001 (5)
17.i.t~e2 11xe2 1S:iVx~2 ~e8 "19.~f1
'Uie6 20.h3 [M=] . 20.~.h6 -2urd1 , LUd5 22.~g3 LUf6 . 23.~f4 . LUd5 24..id2 LUe3! 25.fxe3 dxe3 26:iYe2, exd2 27. ~xe6 J:l.xe6 2SJbd2 '>1I>fS : 29..ic4 [_d) 29...1:le7 30.'it>t2[;t/=] 30.•J:i,e731.il.e2 e3 " .!:txa6 , 47~xa6 f5; 4S.~c8? lllc4+! '49.xh6 , .llle6 55.g3 LUd4 56.A d3 lllf3 57...te2lDe55S;wh5LUg6 112-1/2 ~
1.e4 e5 2.LUf3 LUeS 3.d4 exd4 '4.LUxd4 LUf6 5.LUe3 e6 6.LUdb5 i.b4 ,7.a3 .be3+ S.LUxe3 d5 9.~d31? d4 ~10.lt:le2 e5 11.0-0 0-0 12.h3 %:I. eS ;13.LUg3 .ie6!?N 14.f4 exf4 15...txf4 ,LUd7 16.'iYh5 gS?1 17.'iWhS..... '*'f6?1 ,18•.ig5 'ii'g7 1U\Vh4 tLlee5 20"~h6 .1/;'hS 21.LUf51 ~5 22.exf5 lllxd3 23.exd3 fie5 24..1:114 LUe5 25.1:[af1 ;LUxd3 26.fxg61 fxg6 27J:tf71 LUe5 , . . Ahnasi,Zolt;u;' . .:' ' 2S:%:I.g7+ WhS " 29.J:[ff7+"':' LUeS '. <WippermaDn~Till ,, ';' '30.1:[xg6 d3 31.1:[g4 .l:l.gS 32.l:txh7+ .' GermanyI}undesliga 2005/06 (1 2) , .,,' 1-0 ' 1.e4 c5 2.lUf3 ltlc6 3.d4 exd4 4.LUxd4 " , lllf6 5.LUe3 e6 6.lUdb5 .ib4 7.a3 Kasparov,Garry .• " ,.', .bc3-+- ' S.lllxe3 d5 9.exd5 exd5' Grischuk,Alexaitder . " 10.i.d3 0-0 11.0-0 d4 ..12:LUe2 ~d5 , ~: Cannes rapid 200 I (2) 13.lllf4 'ii'dS 14.lDh5 LUxh5 15.1fxh5 ' h616.1t'h4 .ltd717.~f4 1Wd51S.1:[ad1 1.e4 e5 2.LUf3 ·. llle6 3.d4 exd4 4./Uxd4 lllf6 5.llle3 e6 6.lUdb5 ..tb4 f519.c4 ~f7 20.1fg3 'iff621.b4 WhS ,7.83 ..be3+ S./Uxe3 d5 9.e·xd5 eXd5 .. 22.h4 .!:tfeS 23.lUe1 .teS 24.b5 lba5' 10.iLd3 0-0 11.0-0 d41 ,. 12ke21? 25 ..te5 1/;'f 7 26b d4 fic4 27.ht5' .ig41? 13 •.tg5 \'id6 14.1:.e11? 1:.feS :ixe1+ : 2S.1:.xe1IUb3 - 29~b2 llm 15.'iVd2 .ixe21 · 16 .~f41?N 'ifd7 30,jLg6~d531.hg7+· ,~ ' 1-0 ,~ ~"",
:...-
278
•• ~.
~-
. , .... .".,
• •
_" •• '
" .•• ',.... " .••• '•• ,
.,.
. ._~ • • «
~.;
~
~ ••• ~.
'""
",
·..
K'·· ... ~·~~.!!,,·
'" .
Sicilian Defence - Four Knights Variation
Sicilian Defence Moscow Variation 1.c4 c5 2.:: f3 d6 3 ..ib5+
The most popular minor variation in response to 2 ... d6 is 3.i.bs+. White reaches quiet positions, which are comparatively unexplored. However, it is important to have a positional understanding of the various pawn structures that can occur. White's percentage of wins is not extraordinary, and the high number of draws is an indication of the line's solidity. The following three are all plausible continuations: 3 ... ~d7, 3 .. .t2Jc6 and 3 ... t2Jd7.
Setting up the Maroczy Bind pawn formation (pawns on c4 and e4) either immediately or after 5.0-0, is even more justifiable here than usual, as there is no light-squared bishop that can become bad. However, Black can get perfectly playable positions by fianchettoing along the lines of an Accelerated Dragon, or advancing the pawn to e6 and establishing a Hedgehog Defence. For example, Black has no problems after 5. ttJb8-c6 6. 0-0 g7-g6 7. d2-d4 c5xd4 8. ttJf3xd4 ~f8-g7 9. il.c1-e3 ttJg8-f6 0-0 10. f2-f3 11. ttJb1-c3 'iVd7-d8!? which leaves the d7 -square available for the knight. B)
3.
ttJb8-c6
A) 3. ~c8-d7 The solid line. 4. il.b5xd7+ Again Black has to choose between the aggressive 4 ...t2Jxd7 and the solid 4. ... W'd8xd7 which is the most popular. 5. c2-c4
279
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I This non-committal move often arises from the Rossolimo Variation (2...tLlc6 3. ~b5 d6). 4. 0-0 ~c8-d7 White can continue with 5. 1:tf1-e1 which defends the e4-pawn and prepares for a possible retreat of the bishop to
4. d2-d4 White immediately opens the game so as to make the most of the shortcomings in Black's cramped position. 4. ... tLlg8-f6 5. tLlb1-c3 Now Black has baSically two approaches:
fl.
Alternatively, you can continue with S.c3, and then d2-d4, in some tactical lines sacrificing the e4-pawn for a strong initiative in the centre. For example, S ... tLlf6 6 ..l:tel a6 7.~xc6 ~xc6 8.d4!? jLxe4 9 .jLgS, with optimum compensation for the pawn. lfinstead White immediately plays 4.d4, after 4 ...cxd4 S .'~xd4 you transpose to the Hungarian Variation l.e4 cS 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4cxd44.'iVxd4tLlc6 S. ~bS.
C)
3 ....
5.
c5xd4 6. 'iWd1xd4 Now Black regularly advances the e-pawn chasing the queen away. 6. ... e7-e5
C1)
tLlb8-d7
It is true that this leaves Black with a weak backward d6-pawn. However, in an age when the Sveshnikov and Kalashnikov Variations are hugely popular, this can no longer scare anyone; even if White keeps an unpleasant initiative with correct play. This ambitious move is the riskiest of the three. Black puts his faith in the bishop pair and the substantially solid nature of the position, but the price he pays is a cramped game that entails an abundance of tactical dangers. The variation is therefore playable, but Black should have a good knowledge of the lines involved. 280
C2)
a7-a6 5 .... The ambitious approach, which aims to gain the advantage of the bishop pair : however, Black is behind in developmentafter 6. ~ b5xd7+ tLlf6xd7 The resulting position is fraught with danger for Black. Ideas such as liJdS are in the air, and Black must defend him-
Sicilian Defence - Four Knight s Variation
self with accuracy if he wants to come out of this alive, For example.
7. 0-0 8. ~c1-gS 9. d4xcS!? 10. J::If1-e1
e7-eS
g4 48.ttl~6+1 ~a7 ~" 49.c7 Axe7 SO.ttlxc7 g3 S1.ttlbS+" wbS 52.ttld4 1·0
~d8-c7
ttld7xcS
"
lvanchuk. Vastly Miton~Kamil
,
Havana CaPablanca mem 2006 (5)
White is exerting unpleasant pressure on the centre,
,1.e4 c5 2.lbf3 dS 3;iL.bS+ Ad7 '4 ..b d7+ tt)xd7 S.O-O lbgfS 6.'iWe2 e6 7.b3 Jl.e7 ' 8..ltb2 0-0 9.c4 as 10.d4 .cxd4 11.lbxd4 /Ci'aS 12.lbc3 ·:tfeO 13.11ad1 l:taca 14.f4 bS 1S.e5 b4 1S.exfS · bxc3 17.iUc3 'iixc3 .18.fXe7 lbfS19.g4 dS .20.gS lbe4 21.f5 11xe7 22.fS l:td7 23.cxd511xd5 ; ;24'," xe4lXcd8 2S.lXf3 'ilfc5 2S.l:tfd3 : eS 27.fxg7 l1xd4 28.'ilfe3 'iiYd5 : '29.l:xd4 exd4 30.'ii'f4 d3 .31.lXd2 \tfc5+ ' 32.l:tf2 Wd5 33.lld2 l:te8 34.wf2 ll&4. 35.iff6 Ite5 36.tIxd3 ' :1%f5+ . 0-1 !
Ti.mliWi,]a.ii" }>, lvanchuk, Vasily ~ Amste~ani 1994 (6)
, .Rublevsky.Sergey . HarikrisIu:ia,Pentala
[1.e4 c5 2.0 f3 dS , 3.~b5+ ~d7 ' Foros 2006 (7) ." ' ?4.1!ie2 ttlf6 .'. s.hd7+ 'tlfxd7 S.e5 1.84 c5 2.lbf3 dS 3.Ab5+ lbd74.0-0 ~dxe5 .', 7.ttlxe5 ~eS8.ttla3 ttlfd7 lbfS . SJ:te1 e5 6.c3 ~ei 7.d40-0 , ;9.ttlac4 ttlxe5 10.ttlxe5 f6 11.ttlt4 , O.h3 as 9..ltf1 b5 10.d5 lbe8 11.a4 ' 11b8 12.b3lbc713.lba3 ~h014.lbc2 · 1:1 txe2+ ' 12.wxe2 ttlc6 13.c3 eS ,14.a4 .lte,7 15.d3 0-0-0 16..lte3 b6 , gS 1S.AhS reg8 16.lbe3 ' .ltf8 j 17.f3 :td7,18.g4 lXhd8 19.1Xhd1 \~f8 17..b fO 'iixfO 18.axbS axb5 19.1%a7 ,20.h4 CiJe7 21.aS wb7? 22.axb6 ' ~b7 20....a1 lXa8 2U1xb7 ttxa1 ' :axbS 23.:a3 ttld5 24.:tda1 ~e7 22.11xa1 c4 23.l1xc7 cxb3 24.llxd7 i :'25.hS 9S1! 26.:Ila7+ ~cS 27Jlxd7 1i'c825.rlxf7 l1g7 2S.11xg7 . wxg7 :llxd7 28.hxgS , hxgS 29.g5! bS " 27.c4 bxc4 28.lbxc4 1-0 : 30.gxfS .b fS 31.lbaS+ wb6 32.lb b3 Lilienthal.Andor 'f, ': ltJxe3 33.~xe3 c41!34Jl aS+! ~xaS : 3S.ttlcS+ waS " 3S.lbxd7 ~gS+ Kotov,Alexander '37.""e4 ~c1 38.dxc4 .bb2 39.cS! Moscowch-URS 1940 (12) 1:e4 c5 2.ltJf3 d6 3.Ab5+ lbd7A.d4 '.b c3 40.c6 ~a6 41:;i;>d5 k a5 cxd4 S.'ilfxd4 lbfS S.~gS 'iVaS+ 42.ttlC5+ ~a7 43.Wd6 wb8 44.~d7 gS 4S.lbd3! b4 4S.ttlxb4e4 47.fxe4 , 7.lb c3 as 8.b4 ~d8 9..b fS gxfS 281
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
10..bd7+ .t~d71>Vt:ld5 ·bS 12.lLlM '" i'7.~f6+ ~g7 · 18.li\hS: ~f8 i9>jg7~L licS . 13.lLlfS .bfS 14.exfS· ~g7 ~e 7 20.'il'f6+ <Ji>fil 21.l:[eS ~4 1S.0-0 0-0 1S..tl:ae1 J:le817Jle2 J:tcS 22.a3+-) IS.ttJxe7+Wfil 16.'i¥d6. ,18J .tfe1 eS 19.fxeS fxeS 20.U.xeS $.bStoo] 14...l:txd7 1S.lLle4 [I 5Jld3': i.l:rxeS 2UbeS l:txc2 22:i!:Ye3 <;to>f8 ~gs+ 16:~bl 'il'f6; lS.lIe3 ~gS 16.f4 23.h4h524.J:te7'i¥cS2S.rLa7 1-0e$ 17.J:txeS 'i¥xeS 18.'il'xeS ·' dxeS 19.J:txd7.txf4+ oo ] 1S ...hS?! [IS ...'iVxa2t; l.LeS?! 16.liJf6+ Lf6 ' Dvoretsky,Mark Poh~a,Ha:r.ry . ' ";," 17 .'~g4+ <Ji>h8 18.'il';d7 ~xa2 19.c3±] "1S.J:te3 wh7 17.rLf3! rLf8 18.c.t>b1 bS Viliandi 1972 1.e4 c5 2.lLlf3 dS 3.ibS+ lLld7 4.d4 [18 ... £5? 19.ttJcS+-] 19.~e.3 ~~gS? , cxd4 S:~bd4 lLlf6 S:1I.gS e6 7.ttJc3 [19 .. .'~'h5t]20.'*Yd3 ' 15 ;; 21.lLlxgS+: hxgS :. 221th3+ ,.; .c.t>g7 ' [22...Wg6 ·j.,e7 ao-o-o 0-0 ' 9.llhe1 [9.h4!?] 9...'tWaS 10.hd7 .bd7 .11 ..bf6 gxf6 23.1t'e2!] 23:f.t'e3 f4 24.'il'xeS 'tIi'fS ;[I'L...L:f6 n.eS :J;.e7 13.exd6 :· ..tf6 2S.'*YhS+ ~f7 2S.rLxdS " . . 1-0 .. . 14.lLleS±] 12.eS fxeS 13.lLlxeS J:tfd8 '0 ' [13...~c6 '· 14.l:td3?? (14.ttJxc6 bxc6 Spanton,Timothy : ·Marusenko.Petr ·' .' , :IS.l:td3+-) 14" .dxeS lS ;l:txeS'iWb4!-+ riVoretSky-Scholseth,,"~ Saint Jolm .1,988] Hastings 2005/06 (4) .•'. ", " , ;14.lLlxd7 [14.'il'g4+!! . wfil ' IS,ltJxf7t '1.e4 cS 2.ttJf3 dS 3.~bS+ lLld7 4.d4' lLlfS S.lLlc3 ~xd4 S.'fWxd4 hS 7..te3 :(1 s. lLlxd7+ lhd7 . 16.J:tdS ,· '6lVb6! (16 .. :exd5? 17.'~xd7 Zle8 18.<Ji>bl d4 '· · eS8.~d3 .1te79 ..ic40-010.t2lh4d5 (19,f!fbS!+-) 17Jbe6!? fxe6 18.'ii'xe6 11.exdS e4 12.<'t:lxe4 ttJxe4 j3.lLlgS' ,'il'c6! 19 . J:tf5+ Wg720J.H7+.; ~h8, ' tt:JdS ,14.tDxf8lbe5?'/ [In agood posi~'~ 21.f4!?;!;;) .lS" . <Ji>xV ': 16,rLdS!! exdS tion" Bla~k ov~rlo~k's almost the same: (16 .. .'li'a6 17.J:tfS+!) 17.'i¥hS+ Wfil ,> mate that , Kfanutlk would suffe; 'one ) 8:ifh6+.,: ~al; . 14 . lLldS!? ·~ dxeS! .. year lareragainsr Deep 'Fritz] 1s:ivh7+~ '(14.. :.tg5+J 5.~bl odxe5 ) 6.fj'xeS~d2 r... . ., ,\~, "c,. ';",':. "",':;:.;"::; ,',~ :,.. 1 .~O '
282
Sicilian Defence - Minor Variations
Sicilian Defence Minor Variations ,
1.c2-04 c7-c5 2.{.,g 1-f3 d7-d6
~, .'
After 2 ... d6 White can play other quiet lines and avoid a lot of theory. Curiously, the beginner's move 3. ~f1-c4
has become popular: with the pawn already on d6 the freeing pawn advance to d5 is not usually played, as this would require another tempo and White continues solidly with d3, c3, gb3, ttJbd2 etc., along the lines of the Closed Variation of the RUy Lopez. Another frequently used line is 3. c2-c3
which, compared to 2.c3 in the Alapin, has its own specific features. After 3. ... tZlgB-f6! the e4-e5 pawn advance is no longer possible and so the game develops into a slow struggle characterized by a lot of manoeuvring. White can start with 4.£!.e2 as 4 ... tLlxe4 is impossible on account of 5. ~ a4+. Now a look at some other minor systerns: after the normal 3. d2-d4 Black sometimes continues with 3. ... ttJg8-f6
By postponing the exchange on d4 by one move, Black seeks to take a bit of the sting out of minor continuations such as 4.~xd4 or 5.f3, since after 4.ttJc3 White no longer has the possibility to play c2-c4. However, White 283
Chess Openin8 Essentials - Volume I can deviate with 4.dxcS!, with good prospects of obtaining an edge. 3. d2-d4 c5xd4 Here, there is another very popular minor variation: 4. 'iWd1xd4
The Hungarian Variation. If Black attacks the queen with 4. ... tLlbS-cS 5. ~f1-b5 And after the exchange on c6, White will usually continue with ~gS and 0-0-0, with a lot of pressure on the centre and good piece play. For example, after 5. ~cS-d7 S. ~ b5xcS ~d7xcS 7. tLlb1-c3 tLlgS-fS e7-eS S. ~c1-g5 ~fS-e7 9. 0-0-0 0-0 10. J:rh1-e1 11. wc1-b1 or II.~d2, White's free play compensates for his opponent's bishop pair. If, on the other hand, Black does not attack the queen immediately (playing, for example, 4 ...a6), White can continue with S.d, setting up the classic Mar6czy Bind formation. Or he can develop normally with tLlc3, ~e3, etc. 284
Every now and then (after l.e4 cS 2.tLlf3 d6 3.M cxd4) the following minor line will pop up in a tournament game: 4. tLlf3xd4 tLlgS-fS 5. f2-f3
White protects e4 with the f-pawn to delay the development of the queen's knight, and in so dOing, he is able to play c2-c4. However, Black can respond effectively in the centre with 5. ... e7-e5! obtaining good play. After the standard 5. tLlb1-c3 Black is the one who can get off the beaten path with 5. ... e7-e5
This m ove is not often played because it does not have a good reputation. However, for now at least, there is no apparent refutation.
Sicilian Defence - Minor Variation s ~cS-d7 6. ~f1-b5+! 7. ~b5xd7+ ~dSxd7 If White now continues with the thematic 8. tDf5, the situation is not clear after 8 ... tDxe4. White will probably have to content himself with a slight advantage after 8. tDf3. The same idea can be achieved by playing ... e7 -e5 one move earlier, instead of ... tDf6, with probable transpositions.
Another minor line is one that enjoyed a certain popularity in the 1990s: after l.e4 c5 2.tDD d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tDxd4 tDf6 5 .tDc3 : 5. ... ~cS-d7
5 ....
ItJbS-d7
is another rare variation which has a surprisingly high win rate. It was used a few times by Bent Larsen. However, it should come as no surprise that it does well, given that ... tDbd7 is a natural developing move in the Sicilian, and therefore sh ould be perfectly playable.
Godena,Michele Rowson,Jonathan Verona 2006 (4)
This was frequently played by grandmaster Viktor Kupreichik. Even though 5 .. .~d7 is not played often, it does have its objective validity. On d7 the bishop supports the knight on c6 and it is ready to go to c6 after the exchange of the enemy's knight in the centre, which is a move that always makes Black's positioIl less cramped. This variatioIl enjoys particularly good results, perhaps because of its surprise effect. An excellent idea for White is to use an English Attack set-up (D, g4, 14, ~e3, 0-0-0), in which the d7 bishop is less useful than in other Sicilian variations.
.1.e4 c5 2.tDf3 d6 3 ...Itc4 ItJf6 4.d3 tDc6 5/tJbd2 g6 6.0-0 .ig7 7.c3 0-0 S.i.b3 b5 9.11e1 a5 10.a4 b4 11.tDf1 A a6 12.i.g5 tDd7 13.i.d5 ' :rcS 14..,bc6 J:l.xc6 15.'i¥d2 bxc3 16.bxc3 tt:le5 17.tt:lxe5 dxe5 18.c4 .ild6 19.1!i'c2 f6 20.~e3 J:l.xd3 21 ..bc5 rId7 22/be3 fIIc7 23 ..b3 lUd8 24.tDd5 "fia7 25.c5 e6 26.c6 ttf7 27.c7 .l:!c8 2S.~c5 'fi'b7 29..l:!ab1 exd5 30.J:rxb7 .bb7 31.~b6 . d4 32..b a5 n e8 33.l:b1 ~c8 34..llbS ~hS 35.W1c4 : ]:tff8 36 ..ib4 J:tgS 37.a5 ~f8 3S..bfS l:rexf8 39.a6 1-0
Salov,Valery LjubojeVic,Ljubomir " Buenos Aires 1994 (6)
1.e4 c5 2.tDf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tDxd4 tt:lf6 5.13 e5 6.A b5+ iLd7 7.A xd7+ 285
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
'\lf~d7 S.tDfS dS 9.-igS dxe4·'10..b f6 'fi'xd1+ 11.cJ;>xd1 gxf6 12.fxe4 tDe6 ,13.e3 ~gS 14.g3 ~ dS+ 1S.tDd2 tDe7 16.'if<e2 wd7 17.Ilad1 ~e6 18.tDf3 J:lxd1 19.tDxe7+ -ixe7 20.Jlxd1 lldS ; 2U!.xdS .bdS 22.tDh4 ~e7 23.tDfS ~fS 24.b4 <;t>d7 2S.w b3 <;t>e6 26.~e4 a6 27.a4 b6 2S.94 bS+ 29.w b3 \t?d7 30.tDe3 .th6 31.tDd5 .tgS 32.c4 ,\t?e6 33.tDe3 bxc4+ 34.'~xe4 ~h4 3S.tDdS ~gS 36.h3 .th4 37.tDe7+ <;i.> d7 3S.tDfS ~e1 39.b5 axbS+ 40.<;t>xbS -id2 41.';i;>b6 ~e1 42.a5 .if2+ , 43.<;t>b7 \t?e6 44.'~e6 1-0
i d7 11.0-0-0 tDc6 12.tDxc6 bxc6 13.h4I'iVb6 14Jlh3 'eS?! [14 .. Jlb8 IS.tDa4 'iVc7) 1SJ:!.f3 .i.e7 [ls ... Ad 16.eS!] 16.e5! dxeS? [16 ... rlb8! 17.exf6 (17 .exd6 flYxb2+ 18. \t?d2 ,, ~xd6 with counterplay) 17 ... ~f8 the solid centre and the bishop pair offer good ' compensation for the pawn) 17.l:l.xd7! <;t>xd71S.'ti'xf7 J:Ia719..lk.c4 'it'de . 20..b e6 c4 21 ..b c4 rld7 22.tDd5 '$iaS 23.b4! ~a4 24.tDb6 'iYxb4 2S.tDxd7 ~xd7 26.l:%b3 1-0
Kosintseva,Nadezhda ' Sedlak,Nikola Moscow 2007 (7)
Bosch.Jeroen Dvoiris.Semen .' Leeuwarden 1997 (4)
".
1.e4 eS 2.tDf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tDxd4 tDf6 S.f3 eS 6 ..tbS+ tDbd7 ?tufS a6 S.iLxd7+ ~xd7 9.$.gS d5 10•.hf6 gxf6 11.tDc3 .ib4 12.0-0 .be3 13.bxc3 dxe4 ,. 14.fxe4 ~xd1 ,1S.IIaxd1 Ae6 16.a4 bS 17.axbS axbS 1S.tDe3 <;t>e719.t2JdS+ .b dS 20.:1xdS IIabS . ,2 U tfd1 :a.hcS ,22.J:1d7+ <;t>eS 23.1:1a7 traS 24JlxaS , btxaS . 25 .'~f2 J:.1 c8 26.J:!d3 lk4 , 27.J:e3 We7 2S.we2 hS 29.<;t>d3fS 30.exfS <;t>f6 3Ule1 ~xfS 32Jl b1 ~g4 33.g3 h4 34.btfH ~e6 3SJ1g1 . hxg3 36.hxg3 fS 37.l:lb1 llxg3+ ' •3S.~d2 ' J:tg2+ 39.Wd3 e4+40.~d4 Ild2+ 41.\t?e3 J:txc2 42~n b3 b4 , 0-1
Ganguly,Surya Shekhar Zugic,Igor i
Calvia 01 2004 (11)
:'
1.e4 cS 2.tDf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tDxd4 " tDf6 5.tDe3 ' Ad7 6.~g5 e6 7.0 dbS .ie6 8 ..b fG gxf69:ifhS a6 10liJd4, 286
1.e4 c5 2.tDf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tt:Jxd4 tDf6 5.tDc3 .id7"6.~gS e6 7.tDdbS ~c6 S~xf6 gxf6 9,'iWh5 a6 10.tDd4 .i.d7 11.0-0-0 b5 12.f4 tDe6 13.'>£,b1 'ifb6 14.tDxc6 .lk.xe6 15.fS ~e7 · 16.l\Yh6 ~c5 17.i£.d3 e5' 1S.g4 b4 ' 19.tDe2 dS 20.tDg3 . 0-0-0 ' 21.exdS ~xd5 22.~e4 .ic4 23.b3 ~b5 24.gS rIxdH 25Jixd1 lIdS 26.l:rxdS+' .!txde 27.gxf6 . i.b6 ' 2S.a4 ' bxa3' 29.~d2 'lWgH 30.<;t>a2 .id4 31.c3 .!te3 32.'iVdS Wic1 33.'iWb7+ <;t>dS 34.'l1rfe7+ > weS ;': 35.'iff8+ .Wc7 36.'lWe7+ ·.i.d7 37.'tIfxa3 'iVxe3 3S.b4' 'llHc4+ 39.1!Yb3 ~bS 40.'iVxc4+, h c4+ 41.Wb2 · ~d4+ 42.'it>a3 ~g1 43.h3 .if2 44.tDh5 .ih4 4S ..if3 >t>d6 46.tDg7 ~xf6 4?tt:JeS+ d7 49.tDdS ~de SO.tDe3 -id3 51.~b3 e4 S2.~hS ~b6 53.tDdS, $..d4 S4.ttJf4 -if1 " S5 ..b:f7 ~eS S6.~e6+ ~d6 S?tt:Jd5 ·' .txh3 5S.tDe3 i-d4 59.tDe4+ ~e 7 60.Ace .1f1 61.~xa6 e362.tDe5 ii.xa6' 63.tDe6+ ~f6 64.tDxd4 h5 65,lt:Jc2 · 0-1 . h4 66.b5 h3
Classical Sicilian - Minor Variations position. However, Black should have no problems in reaching a balanced position after 6 .. .eS! .
Classical Sicilian Minor Variations l.e2-e4 c7-cS 2 ...r. 9 1-f3 d7-d6
B)
6. 3Lc1-e3
(2 ...01 cS) 3.d2-d4 c5xd4 4.li f3xd4 r, gS-f6 S. ~ b 1-c3 !! bS-c6 (S ... d6)
,:,' '! • •
"
t ..,: ... .
."
We have reached the position which is best known as the Classical Sicilian. White has some interesting alternatives to the popular 6.iLgS (see following section). A)
6. f2-f4
A normal developing move, which after the predictable 6 ... e6, gives White the option of establishing an English Attack set-np with £l-f3, 0-0-0, g2 -g4 etc. That is even more dangerous here, as the black knight, which is already on c6, makes Black's position a little rigid (against the English Attack the knight is better placed on d7) . However, Black can try to upset White 's plans with 6 ... eS or with the ambitious 6 ... ttJ g4, and he should not have too much difficulty in reaching a balanced game. 6. f2-f3
With this move White seeks to steer the game towards a Scheveningen-type
287
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
This is also played with the idea of setting up the English Attack. Therefore, Black should respond energetically with 6 ... eS. D) 6. .Iil.f1-e2 After this classical continuation Black has various options: the Classical Dragon with 6 ... g6, the Scheveningen with 6 ... e6, or the Boleslavsky Variation with 6 .... e7-e5
Black has excellent performance statistics in this variation. However, this is largely because of White's frequent choice of the weak 7.tUb3?! instead of the correct 7 .tUf3!. In the analogous Najdorfposition (6. ~e2 eS), 7.tUb3 is the most popular, so it is natural to ask why it is dubious here. The answer is simple: here, after 7 ... ~e7 8.0-0 0-0 9. ~e3, Black only needs one tempo to play 9 .. .aS, and after IO.a4 tUb4 he has excellent counterplay. The move discussed in this section, ... eS, has played an important role in
288
the historical development of the Sicilian. This is because it featured in the first example where weakening the dS-square in order to gain space in the centre was considered to be legitimate. It can thus be seen as the ideological forefather of many variations in which Black advances the pawn to eS in the Sicilian. 7. tUd4-f3! h7-h6! It is necessary to prevent ~gS, which would lessen Black's control of dS . S. 0-0 .\1l.fS-e7 9. J:l.f1-e1 0-0 10. h2-h3 ~cS-e6 11. ~e2-f1 White takes measures against the freeing move ... d6-dS by attacking eS . In response Black repositions the c6-knight to d7 with 11. ... 4'lc6-bS!
- in the style of the Breyer Variation of the Ruy Lopez - with balanced play. For 6 .~ c4, we refer you to the Section on the Sozin - Velimirovic Variation .
Sicilian Defence - Richter-Rauzer 'iVd2 and 0-0-0. This applies pressure on the d6 -pawn and in addition White retains the latent positional threat to take on f6 when Black cannot recapture with a piece. It is true that Black quite often allows this to happen, putting his faith in his bishop pair and the solid nature of his position after ... gxf6. In this case Black castles queenside or keeps his king in the centre, in view of his weakened kingside structure. After 6 .~g5, Black usually plays 6 ... e6. Otherwise, he can choose from some minor variations that accept the creation of dou bled pawns. 6 ... ~d7 is a move that is worth noting.
Sicilian Defence Richter-Rauzer 1.(:4 c5 2. 'j_ f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4
4.!- xd4
!"o
f6 S ...'. c3 «c6
6.~gS
~.
. .. ..
'~"
In old opening reference books, the move 6.~g5 against the Classical Sicilian was called the Anti-Dragon System. And indeed the initial idea was to prevent 6 ... g6, as after 7.ihf6, Black is left with bad dou bled pawns. It was only after the Classical Sicilian had been developed that the move 6.~g5 was used for its objective merits. After the usual reply of 6 ... e6 the German master Kurt Richter first thought of the continuation 7.ltJxc6 bxc6 8.e5, which today is considered to be objectively dubious. However, it did have the merit of kindling interest in 6.~g5. Later the Russian opening expert Vsevolod Rauzer (1908 - 1941) conceived the plan which is still considered to be the best today : combining 6. ~g5 with the developing moves
An unprepared white player can be taken by surprise when confronted with this. The move is connected with some venomous tactical lines with ... ~a5, .. .lic8 and a pOSSible exchange sacrifice on c3. Let's go back to the usual 6. ... e7-e6 which avoids the creation of a doubled pawn on f6. 7. 1Wd1-d2 Now there are two principal continuations: 289
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I A) SLf8-e7 7.... This is the most solid option. 8. 0-0-0 0-0
The most frequently played move is 9. f2-f4 which produces a complicated position. A popular continuation is: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
...
ct:lc6xd4
~d2xd4
'liVd8-a5
~f1-c4
~c8-d7
e4-e5
d6xe5
f4xe5 i..g5-d2 ct:lc3-d5 ct:ld5xe7+
~d7-c6
ct:lf6-d7
ers have switched their allegiance to the alternative move 9.
ct:ld4-b3
which immediately highlights the weakness on d6, B) a7-a6 7.... Black immediately prevents 8.ct:ldb5, which will be dangerous after the doubling of White's major pieces on the d-file. 8. 0-0-0
~a5-d8 ~d8xe7
B1)
8 ....
h7-h6
:i;
d!':c, ~
.. ,;, l!
The weakness of the e5-pawn is compensated for by White's two bishops and space advantage. Back to White's 9th move. It is worth noting that since the I 980s many play290
This immediate challenge is deSigned to definitively eliminate White's everpresent threat to take on f6. It has its drawbacks: after 9,iH4, there is great pressure on d6. But above all, White has a nice position after he establishes
Sicilian Defence - Richter-Rouzer an English Attack-like set-up (f3, g4,
M): 9. ~g5-e3
This is very dangerous, as 8 ...h6 has created a target that White can utilize to open up lines of attack on the kingside.
After 11.fxgS, the move II...ttJg4 follows. Alternatively, Black can expand on the queenside with 9 ... bS.
Another option is to continue with the normal developing move 9. ... ~f8-e7
62) 8. ~c8-d7 To avoid being exposed to a pawn storm, Black sometimes delays castling and (after 7 ... a6 8.0-0-0) plays this move instead of 8 ... h6, thus reserving the possibility of castling queenside in some cases. 9. f2-f4
Now there are various strategic options: Black can break up White's aligned central pawns with 9 ... h6 10. ~h4gS.
In this last case, White usually proceeds with 10. tLld4-f3 Putting pressure on the d6-pawn. 10. ... b7-b5 11. i.g5xf6 1 l.eS!? is also interesting, After the text Black can sacrifice the d6-pawn with II ... .ib:f6, which was a popular continuation in the 1960s; however, it is not completely sound. Alternatively, he can continue with the solid 11. ... g7xf6 291
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Morozevich,Aleiander Avrukh,Boris Turmol2006 {13f
producing a pawn structure which is common in these variations. White seeks to put the e6-pawn under pressure with the advance f4-f5, g2-g3, ..\tfI -h3 and the manoeuvre tDc3 -e2-f4), in order to force Black to play ...e6-e5 with a resulting weakness on d5. Black has the two bishops, usually he castles queens ide and grabs space on that flank. In conclusion, the Richter-Rauzer is a variation that does not involve forced tactical lines, which are common in the Dragon, the Najdorf and the Sozin. It is strategically subtle and complex, and it is thus well suited to players who expect to win by virtue of their better general understanding of the game.
. Tal,Mikhail .< >j;, ." Kortcbnoi.Viktor Moittpellier ct 1985 (8) ,.
1.e4 c5 2.tDf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lbxd4 lbfS 5.lbc3 lbcS S.~g5 e6 7.1lfd2 Ae7 S.O-O-O 0-0 9.lbb3 a5 10.a4 d5 ,11 ..tb5 dxe4 12.1!t'xdS jUdS 13.J:lhe1 tDa7 14.~c4 h6 15••bf6 'gxf6 16.lbxe4 f5 17.lbdS~c7 1&g3 bS 19.1bxf5 exf5 20•.td5 jg,e6 21~xaS l%xaS 22.lbd4 £d5 23.J:1e7 ::lea 24.lbb5 .. :". 1-0 292
1.e4 c5 2.lbf3 tDc6 3.d4 cxd4 '4.lbxd4 lbf6 5.~c3 d6 6..tg5 e6 7.'ifd2 as S.tDxc6 bxc6 9.0-0-0 d5 ; ' 10.e5 hS 11.iLh4 g5 12.i.g3 lbd7 ; ,13.h4 g414.'ite2 J:1g815.1Wd3 .t!.bS ; o16.tlfh7 J:tg7 17.'fVhS 'Wa5 "1S.J:td3 : ,d4 19J1xd4 ~Jbb2 ' 20.'it>d2 tDbS ; 21.Ad3 . lbd5 22.l:!c4 ..tb7 , 23.J:l.e1 ; i'1Ib4 24.1%ee4 c525.a3 l:!x04 . ' 26.l:!x04 tbbS 27.J:l.f4 ·tDd5 2S.J:104~ ; lbbG 29.J:1f4 e4 30J:Lx04 lbxc4+ ' 31.iLxc4 .lit.e4 32.'it'xh6 J:1h7 33.'it'e3 ' .i.h6 34 ..tf4 ·i.xf4 35.1Wxf4 i,g6 : ' 3S.g3 .l:th5 37.1Wxg4 U.xe5 3S.1Vd4 ; .1%e5 39.f4 ·We740.g4 J:1e6 41.Ad3 ~.bd3 42.exd3 J:l.c7 43.g5 'ii'xa3 j '44.'i!ff6+ ,, ~e8 45.'fVhS+ 'it>d7 , 4S.tDe2 'i!fb4+ 47.<J;>e3 J:lc2 4S.~h5 1 ~' 'ifd2+ 49.~d4 'it>e7. 50.'it'f3 'iWxe2 ,1 51.1IYb7+Wf8 0-1 ' , ~.
,.
Yakovenko,Dmitry HouYifan.,". Moscow 2007 (3)
0\
1.e4 c5 2.lbf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lbxd4 , lbf6 5.tbc3tt:lc6 6:.i(.g5 e6 7.'it'd2 as S.O-O-O tbxd4 9.'ilYxd4 ii.e710.f4 b5 , 11 •.1i.e2 jLb7 12.~f3 'U.cs 13.JafS ~ gxf6 14.~b1 1%c5 15Jlhe1 ,'ilYc7 ' 1S.f5 O~O 17•.l:te3 'it>hS 1S.'ttd2 J:1gS . 19.1be2 .1i.fS 20.J:1d3 · :re5 21.lbg3 ' jg,e7 22.1IYhS ~dS 23.l:!xd6 ~xdS ' .' 24.J:l.xdS W'fS 25.1IYxf6+ 'Wg7 .; 26.'iYxg7+ ~xg7 27.~c1 lIcS ; 2S.lId7 .tc6 29.1%a7 J:1a8 30.l:tc7 . ~eS 31.tbh5+ ~fS 32.f6 b4 33.tbf4 %Ia5 34.'it>b1 nbS 35.lbd3 e5 3s.g4 : h6 37.M lIab5 38.g5 hxg5 39.hxg5
Sicilian Defenc e - Richter - Rauzer
J:t8b740.n c4 a5 41.b3 1:t7b6 42.a4 bxa3 43.wa2 J:rb8 44.w xa3 A d7 45JIc7 ~eS 46.A g4 l:ISb7 47.l:Ic4 nbS 4S.~f5 1:[dS 49.lle7 J:l.dbS 50Jle7 .!lSb7 51.n xb7 'J:txb7 52.lllxe5 llbS 53.e4 l:tdS 54.c5 lld1 ; 55.e6 l:te156.~b2 C 1-0
35.'Ifoob1 a4 36 ..bh61 37.J::txfS+ <:JiIe7 3S.'iHg5 39.~xg7+ .. ~d7 40.'iWxfS 41.'¥:fxb4 tlh6? · · · 42.l1d5 43.'ife3+ <;i(b7?? 44.l:!.xd7+
J::xhS tLlxfS .tIxh5 'ifb6 1-0
Adams.Michael Kozul,Zdenko ; Short,Nigel Ljubojevic,Ljubomir Amsterdam 1988 (4)
. 1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 'tLlf6 5.tLle3 tLle6 6..itg5 e6 7.'iWd2 a6 S.O-O-O h6 9.~e3 jLd7 10.f4 b5 11.A d3 Jie7 12.'Ifoob1 b4 .13.tLlee2 0-0 14.h3 ~e7 15.g4 '*!Vb7 16.tLlg3 ' tLlxd4 17.hd4 ~c6 18.J:l.he1 IlfeS J9.g5 hxg5 20.fxg5 lbd7 21 •.bg7 <;,t(xg7 22.lZJh5+ 'Ifoog6 23.e5+ <;t>xh5 24.'i!ff4 .bg5 25.'*!Vxf7+ ., <;t>h4 26:'iWh7+ "'g3 27.'1ih5 , ~h2 2S.1i'xg5 tlgS 29.l:td2+ iLg2 ' 30.'i!ff4+ llg3 31.~e4 'iWxe4 ' 32.t!¥xe4 1-0
Belgrade tt 1999 (2)
...
1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tllxd4 tLlfS 5.tLlc3lbe6 6..lig5 eS 7.'ifd2 a6 S.O-O-O i.d7 9.f4 b5 10..b f6 gxf6 11."'b1 'iHbS 12.tLlxe6 .1l.xe6 13.'ii'e1 .ite7, 14.~d3 a5?! 15.f5N b4?! 16.tLle2 e5 17.tLlg3± 'ifc5 1S.'iVe2 .tIcS 19.b3! 0-0 20.~c4 w hS . 2UXhe1 J:l.gS 22.'fVh5! ~eS 23.'fVh6 'iWb6 24.tLlh5 'ii'dS 25.tld2+- : g5 2S.J:ted1 ~cS 27.tLlxf6 %lg7 2S.tLlh5 tlg4 29.tLlf6 1197 30.94 '\ifb6 31.h3 l:l.dS 32.tLlh5 l:tggS 33.A xf7 ~g5 34.'ife6 J:!.gfS ' 35.lbd6 llxd6 36.~xe5+ UfS 37.tLlxfS 1-0
Zelcic,Ro~rt
AncIDd. Viswanathan Shirov,Alexey Paris rapid 1992 (i)
1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 tLlf6 5.tLle3 tlle6 S.~g5 e6 7.'iI'd2 as S.O-O-O hS 9.Jie3 ~e7 10.f3 llbS 11.g4 . tLle5 12.h4 b5 13.'i!fg2 b4 14.tllb1 tLle4 15.hc4 'i!fxc4 16.g5 tLld717.b3 ~e71S.gS tLle519.gxf7+ ~xf7 20.tLld2 · e5 21.tLlc6 1:[I;)S 22.tLla5 1J.b5 23.tLldc4 ~eS 24.<;,t(b1? ,'We71 25.f4 llxa5 26.tLlxa5 ~xa5 27.fxe5 dxe5 2S.1ifg6+ 'Ifooe7 29Jl d2 'Vie7?, 30.J:!.f1?1 tLld7 3U[df2 ~d6 32.<;,t(e1 a5 33.h5 <;t>dS 34Jld2 '\ife6
Kozul,Zdenko ., Pozega 2000 (7)
1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 tLleS 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 ·tLlfS 5.tLle3 d6 6.~g5 eS 7.'i¥d2 a6 " S.O-O-O ~d7 . 9.f4 b5 10.it.xf6 gxf6 11.<~b1 'i¥bS 12.tLlxc6 h e6 13.'i!fe1 J:l.a7 14.f5 'ife5 15.~d3 .tIe7 1S.1!fM $..e717.tLle2 e5 1S.~h6 a5 19.~g7 %:tfS 20.'ifxh7 a4 21,'ii'h6 a3 22.b3 ttgS 23.~e1 l:[xg2 24.l:tdg1 .tIxe2 ' 25 ••b e2 .be4 26 ..1l.d3 St.xh1 27.l:tgS+ '· A fS 2S.'iWxh1 d5 29:i/Vf1 <:JiIe7 30.'ife1 'ifd4 31.'iHe1 b4 32.l:thS J:!:e3 33 ..tIh7 e4 34.'iWf4 .tIxc2 0-1 293
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Spassky,Boris ZhUkhovitsky,Samuel
2'6:tbb4h5"27:93
1:ta5 25.tbd3 rJ:Jc7 J:[e5 28.li:ld3 UbS 29.~e2 J:!a5 30.fxe6 fxe6 31.11f2 e5 32.lbf5 .bf5 Lening~ad 1957 (4) 1.e4 c5 2.tZlf3 ltJc6 3.d4 cxd4 33.J:!xf5 d5 34.exd5 'iWxd5 35.ltJb4 4.lDxd4 ltJf6 5.ltJc3 d6 6.~g5 e6 'ii'd7 36.J:!xh5 .bb4 37.cxb4 lld5 7.'iWd2 a6 S.O-O-O ~d7 9.f4 JJ.e7 3S.rIc1+ <;!.;>b7 39.'fWe4 liteS 40.l:tb1 10.tZlf3 h6 11.~xf6gxf6 12.f5 Vlic7 rJ:Jb6 4U:!h7 l:l.d4 42.'ij'g6 ' 'iVc6 43.l:tf7 J:.Id6 44.1Wh6 'tWf3 45.'fih7. 13.<;!';>b1 0-0-0 14..tc4 WbS ,15.i.b3 l:1eS 16.ltJe2 exf5 17.exf5 .bf5 ' " 'tic6 46.'fih6 'iYf347.'fWh71Wc6 Y2-1/2 1S.ltJc3 ~fS 19.tbd4 tZlxd4 20.'fixd4 l:tgS 21.ifxf6 ~g6 22.Vlif2 iLg7 .23.tZla4 J:1geS 24.l:l.hf1 J:te4 25.ltJb6 ' Fischer,Robert i ,.:tceS 26.ltJd5 'ifc5 27.ltJf4 ~d4 . Spassky,Boris 2S.'fWh4 ~e5 29.g3 a530.a4 l:l.b4 Reykjavik Wch m 1972 (20) ' " 31.ltJxg6 llxh4 32.ltJxh4 f6 33.tZlf5 1.e4 c5 2.ltJf3 tZlc6 3.d4 cxd4 ' h5 34.Ud5 lWc7 35.nb5 b6 36.ltJe3 i 4.ltJxd4 ltJf6 5.ltJc3 d6 6.~g5 e6 ~d4 37.ltJd5 'ifdS 3SJ:tf4 $J.c5 .. 7.'ifd2 a6 S.O-O-O itd7 9.f4 ~ei 39.J:l.xf6 lle2 40.J:!f7 IU2 4Uth7 10.~e2 0-0 11.~f3 h612.~h4ltJxe4 l:xh2 42.ltJxb6 .bb6 43.i.d5 rJ:JcS 13 ..be7 tZlxd2 14.~xdS ltJxf3 44.l:tb7 {' 'fIVeS 45.J:t5xb6 'fWe1+J5.ltJxf3 IlfxdS 16•.i:txd6 rJ:JfS 46.Wa2 J:!.xc2 47.J:!a6 J:!c74SJ:tbS+ 17.J:!.hd1 We7 1S.ltJa4 ~eS 19.J:l.xd8 <;!';>d7 49J:IfS 'iWb4 50.l:l.f7+ rJ:JdS .i:txdS 20.ltJc5 J:!.bS 21.J:!d3 a5 51J:tf4'iYd252JHS+ 1-0 22J:tb3 b5 23.a3 a4 24Jl c3 .tIdS 25.ltJd3 f6 26.11c5 J:!.bS 27.J::tc3 g5 Fischer,Robert 2S.93 wd6 29.ltJe5 g4 30.ltJe4+ We7 31.liJe1 :IdS 32.tZld3 J::t.d4. Spassky,Boris . 33.ltJef2 h5 34J.tc5 J:!d5 35.J:tc3 Reykjavik Wch m 1972(18) 1.e4 c5 2.ltJf3 d6 3.ltJe3 ltJc6 4.d4 , ltJd4 36.J:!c7+ J:!.d7 37.J:!.xd7+ ..IiI.xd7. cxd4 5.ltJxd4 tZlf6 6.~g5 e6 7.ltd2 • 3S.ltJe1 e5 39.fxe5 fxe5 40.Wd2 ~f5 ' a6 S.O-O-O ~d7 9.f4 ~e7 10.ltJf3 b5 41.ltJd1 ~d6 42.ltJe3 Ae6 43.Wd3 11..bf6 gxf6 12.~d3 'iVa5 13.<,f;>b1 ~f7 44.rJ:Jc3 Wc6 45.~d3 ~c5 b4 14.ltJe2 'iWc5 15.f5 a5 16.ltJf4 a4 · 46.~e4 ~d6 47.~d3 iLg6+ 4S.Wc3 17.l:te1 J:tbS 1S.c3 b319.a3 ltJe5 ~e5 49.ltJd3+ ~d6 50.ltJe1 <;!te6 20.l:l.hf1 ltJc4 21.~xc4 Jlfxe4 51.rJ:Jd2 ~c5 52.ltJd3+ wd6 53.tlJe1 22.l:l.ce1 ~dS 23.'ifi>a1 rtb5 24.ltJd4 ". ltJe6 54.>t>c3ltJd4 ,,' 1/;-Y2
294
Sicilian Defence - Dragon Variation
Sicilian Defence Dragon Variation 1.e4 c5 2 . 't f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4
4 ..0:' xd4 :; f6
5. ~
c3 96
The name Dragon came about at the beginning of the 20th century and it was the happy brainchild of the Ukrainian master Fedor Duz-Khotimirsky. He was crazy about astronomy, and he noted that there was an analogy between the form of the pawn structure d6-e7 -fl -g6-h7 and the dragon-shaped Draco Constellation; as a result, the fire-breathing beast of Greek mythology finds itself back in chess opening theory. As mentioned before, the modern version of the Dragon with the move order 2 ... d6 and S... g6 did not make its debut until 1924, when it was employed in a Reti-Tartakower game played in New York. It was created as a means of preventing the Mar6czy Bind (S.c4), which White can use against the AcceleratedDragon (2 ... tt:lc6 and4 ...g6). In the past it was also common to use a type of Deferred Dragon via the Clas-
sical Sicilian: l.e4 cS 2.tt:lf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tt:lxd4 tt:lf6 S.tt:lc3 tt:lc6 with the idea of advanCing the pawn to g6 on the 6th move. However, Rauzer's move 6 .~gS! (see the previous section) with the idea of creating doubled pawns on the f-file in the event of 6 ... g6,
meant that this move sequence was not very attractive for black players wishing to fianchetto on the kingside. Before we look at the modern variations, we will examine the development of the £I-bishop to e2 with the intention of castling kingside as soon as possible. Part of the purpose of looking at this move first is to put things in an historical context. In the early years of this opening, White almost always played 6 .~e2.
Classical Variation 6. ~f1-e2 and now:
£.f8-g7
tObS-c6 7. ~c1-e3 0-0 S. 0-0 9. tt:ld4-b3! Preventing the central thrust 9 ...dS.
A)
295
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume i1I.cS-e6
9 . ... 10. f2-f4
The key posItIOn of the Classical Dragon. Black's resources seem to be adequate after IO ... tt:la5, I O.. .'~fc8 or, better still, IO ... l:ic8. In recent years, positionally-minded players have been using 7.g e3 less often, and instead it has become popular to employ the solid plan:
7. 0-0 S. ttJd4-b3 9. lJ:f1-e1
B)
:a1.~
ii
~i
However, this line is not seen very frequently these days.
Fianchetto Variation 6. 92-93
ttJbS-c6 0-0
i.~ '
ii1.i ~i
White intends to play 10 .gO, with the idea of tt:ld5 and g g5. The resulting pressure is not enough to give him an objective advantage, but it can still be annoying for Black.
296
The following positional line became reasonably popular in the 1980s, mainly because of its adoption by Karpov: 9.gg5.
This fianchetto development of the king's bishop, which avoids lines that are too sharp or overly theoretical, has always enjoyed a certain popularity with players who wish to enter a more strategically -orientated game. However, with correct play, Black will not have any problems in achieving a satisfactory pOSition with chances for both sides, for example:
Sicilian Defence - Dragon Variation
6 . ... 4:lbB-c6!? with the idea to exchange on d4. Against this White's best continuation is probably 7. 4:ld4-e2!? after which a phase of slow positional manoeuvring follows. The ensuing positions offer equal chances for both players.
The Yugoslav Attack 6. ~c1-e3
Levenfish Variation 6. f2-f4
The Levenfish is another variation which has always had its admirers. This is perhaps because after the spontaneous 6... ilg7, the move 7.e5! gives White a dangerous initiative. If Black does not have a good knowledge of the narrow path that leads to a likely draw, there is a good chance he will be beaten. The safest option for Black is to prevent the pawn advance e4-e5 with 6. ... tLlbB-c6 with a balanced position. The real theoretical revolution regarding the Dragon started in 1936 with the advent of:
This set-up was championed by the same person who co-developed the Richter-Rauzer Variation! For this reason the ensuing line involving queenside castling is often also called the Rauzer Variation, and it first appeared in the game Rauzer-Chekhover played in the Young Masters Championship of 1936. With 6. ile3 followed by 7.f3 (or vice versa as Rauzer used to prefer), White ambitiously plans for 'ijf d2, 0-0-0, ilc4, g2-g4, h2-h4-h5, .I.1.h6, ilxg7, hSxg6, 'itVh6+, 4:ldS and checkmate! Naturally, White is not the only player moving his pieces, and on the queenside Black is often the first to be able to threaten the safety of the opponent's king. The ensuing sharp lines can become some of the most complex in opening theory. ~fB-g7 6 .... 7. f2-f3 0-0 Or also the immediate 7 .. .4:lc6. B. ~d1-d2 4:lbB-c6 We have arrived at the first big theoretical crossroads. 297
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
Black is ready to play the freeing advance 9 ... dS. White can try to stop this with either 9.~c4 or 9.g4, or otherwise ignore it with 9.0-0-0. A)
9. 92-94
.Q:a8-b8 12. a2-a3 13. h2-h4 J::!:f8-c8 Now White usually simplifies with 14.tt:JdS, followed by the exchange of queens. He contents himself with a microscopic advantage, without risking a direct assault on Black's castled king. B)
This prevents 9" .dS, which would be met by IO.gS, after which 11.tt:JxdS simply wins the d-pawn. However, compared to 9.0-0-0, White's position becomes more rigid. Usually the g2-g4 advance as part of a general attack on the kingside is played only when necessary. The IIlOSt COIIlIIlOIl continuation is: 9. ... .l1Lc8-e6 10.0-0-0 After 1O.tt:Jxe6 fxe6, the weakness on f3 becomes apparent. 10.... tt:Jc6xd4 11. iLe3xd4 ~d8-a5 298
9. 0-0-0
Ignoring Black's 'threat' and putting his faith in his lead in development and the pressure on the d-file. Black can decide against 9 ... dS, and instead play 9 ... tt:Jxd4. B1)
9. tt:Jc6xd4 10. iLe3xd4 iLc8-e6 But after 11. ~c1-b1! White has a slight advantage.
Sicilian Defence - Dragan Variation
Here is an advantage compared to the line with 9.g4. 11...t>b I! prevents the move 11...'iYaS, which would be met by 12 .ttJdS. Black must prepare ... ~aS by first using two tempi with ... '!Wc? and .. .l:Hc8. He leaves the f8-square to the king to thwart the intermediate check tlJdSxe7+ after tlJ dS '!Wd2, which would otherwise be disastrous. 82)
9.
d6-d5
is not clear if Black has sufficient compensation after 13 ... ~ c? White's generally preferred continuation is It
12 . ..IiLe3-d4 13. ild4-c5
e7-e5
Now Black offers an exchange sacrifice with 13 ....
..\1LcB-e6
banking on his control of the darksquare complex. However, White rarely accepts this Greek gift and continues 14. ~c3-e4
This is Black's thematic reaction in the Yugoslav Attack. The resulting position is sharper than after 9 ... tlJxd4. Strictly speaking, the d-pawn push is a pawn sacrifice: 10.e4xd5 11. ~ d4xc6
~f6xd5
b7xc6
White rarely ventures to accept it; even if after 12 .tlJxdS cxdS 13 .'!WxdS
with a complex position. C)
9. ilf1-c4
This 'standard' move prevents ...dS and places the bishop aggressively on the diagonal that points straight at the black king. 299
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 White's castled kingside position along the b-fiIe. Instead, White's plan is generally: M-h5, a possible g2-g4, Wb 1 which denies Black several tactical possibilities - ~h6, etc. Nowadays, only a few enthusiasts play this line.
However, as always in the opening, a move that brings advantages also has weaknesses: the bishop, be it on c4 or b3 - its usual retreat square - is exposed to an advance by Black's a and b-pawns; and then after the thematic manoeuvre ...ttJe5-c4, it is exchanged for the black knight. Therefore, it is worth asking yourself whether it is worth moving the bishop to b3 only to have it exchanged off. However, Black too must spend time - three moves - to move the knight from b8 to c4. In these variations, opposite-side castling is normal and an extra tempo can be decisive. After 9 ...tc4, Black continues to develop: 9. ... ~c8-d7 10.0-0-0 And now Black has several plans at his disposal. It is worth remembering that White can advance the h-pawn before he castles, but this usually leads to a transposition to the main line.
C1) 10.... iYd8-a5 Historically the first approach to development was to place the black queen on a5, then ..J Hc8 and ... ttJe5 -c4, fol lowed by .. J hc4. In some variations that were created later, Black plays ... b7-b5 in order to recapture on c4 with the pawn, and frontally attack 300
11. JLc4-b3
l:U8-c8
12. 13. 14. 15.
ttJc6-e5 ttJe5-c4 l:!:c8xc4
'>f;>c1-b1 h2-h4 ~ b3xc4
ttJd4-b3
Blacks best choice is probably to move the queen back to d8, which really makes you doubt the validity of the whole variation.
C2) 10.... ~a8-c8 Currently much more common. 11. ~c4-b3 12. h2-h4
tLlc6-e5
Sicilian Defence - Dragon Variation We are now at another crossroads. C21)
12 .... 13. ~b3xc4 14. h4-hS
tLleS-c4 ~c8xc4
White sacrifices a pawn for a kingside initiative. After 14 ... ttJxh5 1 5.g4 ttJf6, White has many playable moves, ranging from the aggressive 16.e5 or 16. ~h6 to more solid moves such as 16.ttJde2, 16.ttJb3 or 16.Wbl. Against all these options, Black appears to have adequate resources with which he can keep the game dynamically balanced. h7-hS C22) 12.... The Soltis Variation, which has been very popular recently. In the early days of the Dragon it seemed contradictory to play a move that allowed White to open files on the kingside by the g2-g4 advance. However, practical play has shown that the two moves that White needs to make in preparation for g2-g4 allow Black to find adequate counterplay. The plan to remove the g7 -bishop with 13 .~h6 does not seem to give White an advantage either after 13 ... tLlc4, or 13 .. .iLxh6 14.'iVxh61:l.xc3!
A thematic exchange sacrifice which is practically forced. Therefore the most popular move has become the preparatory 13. ~ e3-gS White removes the bishop from e3 and, reserving the possibility to exchange on f6, he renders the imminent pawn advance g2-g4 more incisive. It took a long time before black players found an adequate response in this position. The solution was the strange move 13.... J:[cB-cS! First played by Genna Sosonko in 1976.
On the 5th rank this rook has both a defensive and an attacking role. It supports the advance ... b7 -b5 and in many variations prepares for an exchange sacrifice taking the g5 -bishop, or the knight after ttJd5 . Without this resource the Soltis Variation would not have passed the test of time. 301
Chess Opening Essential s - Volum e I ',-:0-: -,.,
Reti,Richard Tartakower,Savielly New York 1924 (11 )
1.tZJf3 g6 2.e4 c5 3.d4 cxd4 4.tZJxd4 tZJf6 5.tZJc3 d6 6.~e2 A g7 7.0-0 tZJe6 S.~e3 0-0 9.tZJb3 ..te6 10.f4 'tWeS 11.h3 tZJeS 12.'ifd2 f5 13.exf5 gxf5 14.J:tae1 WhS ': 15.tZJd4 iLgS 16.g4 tZJxd4 17...txd4 e5 1S.il.e3 fxg4 19..b g4 A e6 20.f5 .bf5 21 Jbf5 J:txf5 22.'iWd3 e4 23.tZJxe4 h5 24.tZJg3 hX94 25.tZJxf5 'iWe6 26.11e2 '..te5 27.~d4 tZJf6 2S.hxg4 11gS 29.iLxe5 dxe5 ' 30.J:rh2+ tZJh7 31.tZJe3 l:ig7 32.~dS+ J:!.gS 33.'iYd3 ," l:lg7 34.Wfe4 ~gS 35Jid2 tZJf6 36.l:!:dS+ ~f7 37JWxb7+ w g6 3S.'ii'f3 wg5 39.J:ld2 e4 ' 40.~g3 . lld7 41.I:1xd7 tZJxd7 42.'iiVf2 tZJc5 43.'tWf5+ 'iYxf5 44.gxf5 tZJa4 45.b3 tZJe346.a4 a5 47.Wf2 tZJa2 4S.w e2 , ~f6 49.w d2 tZJb4 50.'>t>c3 w e5 51.f6 '.t>xf6 52:~ d4 ~e6 53.~xe4 ~d6 ' 54.~d4 tZJc6+ 55.~c4 , tZJa756.c3 '.t>c6 57.'.t>d4 'it'b6 5S.tZJc4+ ~a6 59.'~, d5 tZJcS 60.w e6 1-0
'.r,
35.g4 \fica 36.lt>g2 'tVd7 37.c4 'flVeS 3S.b3 'tVdS 39.'ifd2 f6 40J:rh1 ~f4 41.llfc3 : 'iKhS 42.'ifh3 h543.'iYxh5 llfxh5 44.l:txh5 ~d2 45.b4 1-0
Inarkiev,Ernesto Khalifman,Alexander Khaniy Man~iysk2 00$ (I) ,
1.e4 c5 2.tZJf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tZJxd4 lLlf6 5.tZJe3 g6 6 •.te3 $.g7 7.f3 a6 S.~d2 b5 9.0-0-0 £i.b7 10...th6 ..txh6 11.'ii 'xh6 lLlbd7 12.~b1 tIcS 13.ff'd2 b4 14.lLlce2 ~b6 15.h4 h5 16.tZJe1 d5 17.exd5 tZJxd5 1S.J:Ie1 e5 19.1Lldb3 ,a5 ' 20.lLld3 0-0 2Ut f2 'iJlic7 22.94 a4 23.lLlbc1 a3 24.gxh5, axb2 25.tZJb3 e4 26.fxe4 , tZJc3+.' 27.w xb2 tZJxe4 2S.'fNh2 'iYc3+ 29.~b1 ~d5 30.l:td1 'iYf6 31.~h3 .txb3 32.axb3 tIaS 33.tZJb2 lLlc3+ 34.w c1 tIa1 + 35.~d2 lLlxd1 36Jlxd1 'iKxb2 37.J:ba1 'iVd4+ 0-1 .
Rauzer, Vsevolod Chekhover, Vitaly Leningrad J 936 (8)
.,
1.e4 c5 2.tZJf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tZJxd4 tZJf6 5.tZJe3 g6 6.f3 .\tg7 7.iLe3 0-0 Karpo~,Anatoly Sosonko,Genna S.'iWd2 .tZJc6 9.0-0-0 tZJxd4 10.~xd4 . ~e6 11.w b1 l:i.cS 12.h4 tZJh5 Bad Lauterberg 1977 (1) 1.e4 c5 2.tZJf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tZJxd4 13..txg7 ·~xg7 14.lLld5 .bd5 tZJf6 5.tZJc3 g6 6.~e2 fig7 7.0-0 tZJc6 15.exd5 tZJg3 16 J~h2 ' e5 17.dxe6 fxe6 · 1S.h5 tZJxh5 19.'iYxd6 'i!Vxd6 S.tZJb3 0-0 9.~g5 ~e6 10.'.t>h1 a5 11.a4 tZJd7 12.f4 tZJb6 . 13.f5 sil.c4 20.J:txd6 l:lfdS 21.l:rxdS ttxdS 14.b c4 tZJxc4 15.'i¥e2 tZJb6 16JWb5 .' 22.~c1 tZJg3 23.~d3 l:ld4 24.J:lh3 lLld4 17.lLlxd4 ~xd4 18.l:l.ad1 .\kg7 , lLlh5 25.g3 b6 26.'.t>d2 l:!.d5 27.~e3 19 ~e3 tZJd7 20.tZJd5 I:teS 21.e3 .lte5 1:[g5 2S.w f2 lIa5 29.a3 ~f6 30.I:th4 . 22.~b6 tZJxb6 23.tZJxb6 l:1a6 24.tZJc4 tl.c5' 31.11d4 l:!.d5 32.11c4 llc5 ~bS 25.lLlxa5 I:tca 26.tZJc4 A xh2 33.11xe5 bxc5 34.b4 cxb4 35.axb4 27.lLlb6 I:txb6 2S.'¥Hxb6 ~e5 29.a5 tZJd5 36.b5 lLlc3 37.w e3 e5 3S..tc4 l:(c6 :,. 30.'tVe3 'i'c7 3U'Id5 tIa6 h5 39.wd3 tZJa4 40.££.d5 g5 41 •.tc6 32.\\i'd3 rbg7 33.n b5 g5 34.'tWd5 I:ta7 112- 1/2 ' h4 42.gxh4 gxh4 43.f4 ,.. 302
Sicilian Defence - Dragan Variatian
. ~,
~
,',
.~
Lahno,Katerina Jobava,Baadur
,~
.....
"
- dS 23.iif2 lZlaS 24.~c5 lLle7 2S.fS fS 2S.exdS eS 27.lLldS Uc7 2S.lZlde4 l');cS 29.dS lLlcS 30.lZld5 31.gS ,~ Dubai 2004 (2) ' 1.e4 cS 2.tbf3 dS 3.d4 lLlfS 4.lLlc3 lZld4 32 ..b d4 , exd4 33.gxfS .bfS ,cxd4 S.lLlxd4 gS6.i e3 ~g7 7.f3 , 34.lZlexfS .l:txfS 3S.'i!bd4 ,·it.xfS+ , 1-0 lLlcS S.'lWd2 0-0 9.0-0-0 dS 10.tia1 J:tdS ' 20.~f2 Ud2 Moscow1968 ! 21.'i!fxa7 lLlxb2 22.tbd4 lLla4! 1.e4 cS 2.lZlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lZlxd4 . 23.lLlxb5? , lZlxc311 24.£LC4 lLlxbS lZlfS S.lZlc3 gS S..te3 ..ig7 7.f3 0-0 S..ltc4 lZlcS 9.'ii'd2 ~a5 10.0-0-0 -2S.'ii'e3 .td3! 0-1 ~d7 11.h4 lZleS 12.~b3 f,[fcS 13.hS lLlxhS 14.i h6 ,b h6 1S.1I/fxh6 .l:txc3 16.bxc3 ~xc3 17.lZle2 'tfNc5 1S.g4 Timman,Jan ,.' Miles,Anthony lLlfS 19.9S lLlhS 20.x:txhS gxhS 21.l:rh1 'ike3+ 22.~b1 ,.iixf3 :.: Bad Lauterberg 1977 (2) :1.e4 cS 2.tbf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 23Jlxh5 e6 24.gS tLlxg6 2S.'iVxh7+' lLlfS ,S.lLlc3 gS ' S.A e3 ~g7 7.f3 0-0 <MS 26..11fS ~xb3+ 27.axb3 exfS S.VWd2 lLlcS 9.0-0-0 ,dS 10.exdS , 2S.lLlf4 J:tdS 29.~h6+ tib2 ' f,[cS 18.~e3 D~ Hermanas 2003 ( 5) 'ilfcS 19.~h4 as 20.l:[dh1 e6 21.a4 ,1.e4 cS 2.lLlf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 bS 22.axbS a4 23 ..b 2 · iIxbS ,lLlfS S.lZlc3 gS S.~e3 ~g7 7.f3 lZlcS "S.\ltd2 0-0 9..tC4 lLld710.0-0-0 lLlbS 24.11xh7 lZlxh7 2S.'ii'hS tfxc3+ 2S.'~b1 .tc4 27.1ilfxh7+ >tifS' 1ULb3 lZlaS 12.'ti'd3 .td7 13.w b1 '.!:.tcS 14.g4 lZlac41S.h4lLleS1S.iie2 2S..bc4 : xc4 29.'i¥h4 >tieS 30.'Iti'fS >tid7 31.l:thS J:lcS 32J;rxc8 >tixc8 as 17.hS a41S.hxgS axb319.gxh7+ ", O~1 'WhS 20.cxb3 eS 21.f4lZlcS 2Vi::jdbS ... 33.tLle2 'ii'b4+ ._
n17
303
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Nunn,John "Ward,Christopher England tt 1997/98 (5)
1.e4 e5 2.ttlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.ttlxd4 ttlf6 5.ttlc3 g6 6 ..te3 .tg7 7.13 ttle6 8.'iVd2 0-0 9..tc4 ~d710.0-o-0 'iVa5 11.h4 ttle5 12•.tb3 :rfc8 13.g4 b5 ,14.h5 ttlc4 1s.hc4 bxc4 16.~h6 ~hS 17.ttlfS ,· l!te8 18.'iVgS 'iYb6 19.hxg6 fxg6 20.iLg7 .bg7 21.ttlxg7 ,J:tebS 22.ttlh5 ttlxh5 23.gxh5' ~e8 '24.b3 exb3 25.axb3 'tIrc5 26.ttld5 ) l b7 27.ttlxe7+ llxe7 2S.'ii'xe7 ncs 29.11h2 gxhS 30.l:tg2+ ~g6 31.l:txd6 'iVe3+ 32.n gd2 :If8 '33.:IdS nxdS " 34;'iYxdS+ wg7 35Ji'd4+ 1i'xd4 36.J:txd4 h4 37.'j;>d2 h3 38.We3 wh6 39.Wf4 ' 1-0
,c
8.'iVd2 ..td7 9..itc4 0-0 10~"0-0·0 ttle5" 11.iLb3 Ile8 12.~b1 tIeS 13.g4 bS 14.g5 b4 1S.ttlee2 ttlh5 16.14 ttle4 17..b c4 llxc4 18.b3 Ilc719.f5 'ii'aS 20.'il'd3 a5 2Ul hf1 a4 22.J:If2 axb3 23.cxb3 ..tcS 24.fxg6 fxg6 2S.ttlb5 ~a6 26.'ii'd5+ 'iVxdS 27.J::txd5 rIb7 28/iJa7 l:Id7 29.ttlc6 iLb7 30.ttlxb4 e6 31.Ilb5 b e4+ 32.';ltc1 ' d5, 33.~c5 ' d4 34.1:ta5 e5 35.a4 ~f5 ' " c36.Ita7 Ilc8 0-1 : ,"
Karpov,Anatoly Kortchnoi. Viktor
Smirnov,Igor ' Fedorov.Alexey Moscow 2007 (3)
"
1.e4 c5 2.ttlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.ttlxd4 ttlf6 S.ttlc3 g6 6.~e3 iLg7 7.t3 ,ttlc6 , 304
;
1.e4 e5 2.ttlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.ttlxd4' ttlf6 S.ttlc3 g6 6.~e3 fLg7 7.t3 ttlc6 8.'ii'd2 '0-0 9.i.c4 fLd710.h4 nc8, 11.i.b3li:le5 12.0-0-0 ttlC4 13..txc4 lixc4 ' 14.h5 -, ttlxh5 15.g4 ttlf6 . 16.ttlde2 , ~a5 , , 17.~h6 .bh6 1S.'i¥ixh6 l!tfeS 19J.td3 %l4c5 20.gS l:txg5 . 21 J:ld5 ':xdS ', 22.ttlxd5 nea 23.ttlef4 ..tc6 24.e5 iLxdS 25.exf6 exf6 26.'ifxh7+ wf8 27.'ifh8+ 1-0
"
"1.e4 cS 2.ttlf3 ttlc6 3.ttlc3 g6 4.d4 cxd4 5.ttlxd4 ~g7 6.i.e3 ttlf6 7.~c4 0-0 8..ib3 d6 , 9.t3 ~d7 .10.h4 h5 11.'iVd2 lLlaS 12..ith6 ttlxb3 13.ttlxb3 a5 14.ttld4 hh6 15.'iVxh6 · 'ti'b6 16.0-0-0 lUeS 17.g4 l!txc3 18.bxc3 'irc5 19.J:td3 'ii'e5 20.gxh5 'ttlxh5 .21.llg1 ttlf4 22.1le3 lleS 23J1g5 'Wf6 24.1:txa5 e5 25.ttlb3 d5 26.exd5 ~fS , 27.d6 ~xd6 2S.l:taxeS 'fi'a3+ 29.wd2 'iVd6+ 30.ttld4 ttle6 31.we1 J:txc3 ' 32.ttlxe6 Uxe3+ " 33.1i'xe3 .be6 34.a3 'Ji!Jc7 35.h5 'i!Vxc2 36.hxg6 'ifb1+ 37.<M2 'ife2+ 38.'.ttg3 1-0
,;
Moscow m 1974 (2)
Grischuk,Alexander Bu Xiangzhi
':' Calvia 01 2004 (1 4)
i
~:
t
I
.~
Ljub~jevic,Ljubomir Miles,Anthony ,Brussels 1986 (9)
1.e4 cS 2.ttlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.ttlxd4 ttlf6 5.ttlc3' 96 6.fi..e 3 fLg7 7.13 0-0 8:i fd2 ttlc6 9.:i.c4 fLd7 10.M lleS, 11.~b3 h5 12.0-0-0 ttle5 13.g4 hxg4 14.h5 , ttlxhS 15.~h6 ' e6 16.11dg1 'iYf617.,bg7 1j'xg718.fxg4 ttlt6 19.95 ttlh5 20.ttlee2 , ttlc4 2U!Vb4 as 22.~xb7 ttle5 23.c3 ttld3+ 24.~b1 ttlcS 25JWb6 WeS 26 ..lte2 lIbS 27JlrxaS ' l:txb2+ 28.wxb2 ttld3+ . ", 0-1 .;
Sicilian Defence - Dragon Variation
Anand, Viswanathan Kasparov.Garry New York Wch m 1995 (II)
bxc4 17.eS \i'bS 1s..b fS J:[bS 19.b3 exf6 20.eS fxeS 21.lLlxeS heS 22.lLla4 cxb3 23.lLlxbS bxa2 24.wb2 ttxbS+ 2S.'.t>a3 J:!.a6+ 2S.Wb4 J:tc4+ 27.WbS J:rb6+ 2S.waS fS 29.J:te3 J:rb130.tta3 .i.c3+ .' .0-1
1.e4 cS 2.lllf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4lllxd4 tlJf6 S.t2Jc3 g6 6 ..i.e3 ~g7 7.f3 0-0 S."ifd2 lLlc6 9.$.c4 R.d7 10.0-0-0 lLleS 11.$.b3 J:tcS .12.h4 hS 13.~ b1 lLlc4 14..txc4 lbc4 1S.lLlde2 bS AImasi,Zoltan 16.Ah6 'ifaS 17..bg7 wxg7 1S.lLlf4 " Golubev,Mikhail J:tfeS 19.1LlcdS ~xd2 20.l:txd2lLlxdS Gennany BundesJiga 2003/04 (2) 21.lLlxdS ~fS 22.J:te1· J:tbS 23.b3 1.e4 cS 2.lLlf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.t2lxd4 ttcs 24.lLlf4 n bcS 2S.w b2 as 2S.a3 . t2lfS S.lLlc3 gS 6;1te3 $..g7 7.f3 lLlc6 wg7 27.lLldS AeS 2S.b4 axb4 S.'t1fd2 0-0 9.~c4 Ad7 10.h4 lLleS 29.axb4 l::tc4 30.lLlbS l::txb4+ • 11 ..i.b3 UcS 12.0-0-0 hS 13.£ gS 31.'iPa3 nxc2 0-1 1:lcS 14.wb1 J:[eS 1S.~hS .i.hS 1S.g4 \i'aS 17.gS tlJh7 1S.f4 lLlc4 19.1i d3 t2la3+ 20.Wc1 eS 21.tlJce2 dS Zuidema,Coen 22.exdS exdS 23.fS lLlxc2 24.h c2 $..xfS 2S.ttJxfS 'iYxa2 2S.lLlfd4 'iYa1 + Sosonko.Genna Netherlands tt 1975176 (9) 27.wd2 'ifaS+ 2S.lLlc3 J:[c4 29.lLlb3 1.e4 cS 2.lLlf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 'it'b4 30.c1 · ttxc3 31.bxc3 .i.xc3 lLlf6 S.lLlc3 gS S.$..e3 $..g7 7.f3
305
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Sicilian Defence Scheveningen Variation 1.c4 c5 2 .~ ,f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4/L Xd4 '< ,f6 S."Jc3 ~6
This vanatlon, characterized by black pawns on e6 and d6, which control many squares on the 5th rank, can also be reached by playing Black's 2nd and 5th moves in reverse order; in particular, if Black dislikes the possible simplification with 3 .~b5+. It is currently very popular, especially with top level players. It had its official debut in 1923, when Euwe used it against Mar6czy in the Dutch town of Scheveningen, which is how it got its name. As with other variations of the Open Sicilian (when White advances his pawn to d4), Black is left with an extra centre pawn. The e6 and d6-pawns perform a defensive role and Black's counterplay is focused on the queenside along the c-file; and the use of the a- and b-pawns, which are generally played to a6 and b5, but sometimes the a-pawn goes di306
rectly to a5. For his part, White has a good space advantage and this allows him to implement a number of strategies, marked by their varying degrees of aggressiveness. However, most of the time, White concentrates on kingside play and he usually limits himself to preventive measures on the queenside (such as a2 -a4, to stop ... b7 - b5). All of this means that the Scheveningen produces positions which are strategically highly complex. They are also more flexible than, for example, the comparatively rigid Dragon Variation, even if in some variations of the Scheveningen - such as the Velimirovic Attack - there are also long sequences of forced moves that leave little space for personal interpretation. Another example of the Scheveningen's greater flexibility is evident when you compare it with its sister variation, the Najdorf, to which there are many transpositions. The fact that .. .a 7-a6 has not yet been played allows for more options in some lines. For example, it is not uncommon to develop the bishop to c6 via d7, after the exchange ofknights on d4. Black also has an advantage compared to the Najdorfin the lines where White develops his king's bishop to c4, as Black can immediately put White's centre under pressure; for example, with the manoeuvre ~b8-a6-c5, from where the knight can defend e6 and possibly be exchanged for the bishop on b3. Another example is 6. ~c1-g5 which for years has been the main line against the Najdorf But here it is not as effective, since after
Sicilian Defenc e - Sch eveningen Variation
6 ....
~fS-e7
and 7 ... h6, Black has some tactics based on the motif ... tt:.lxe4. However, it is true that with the pawn already played to e6 , the freeing advance to eS, which is so frequent in the Najdorf, requires an extra tempo. The variations that we will look at are : 6.g3, 6 ..te3, 6.g4, 6 .f4 and 6 ..te2. For the lines in which the king's bishop is developed to c4, we refer you to the fol lowing section.
ever, unlike other white fianchetto variations, play can easily become very aggressive here. Once White stabilizes the centre, he can attack on the kingside by advancing the g-pawn again in a kind of Keres Attack Deferred . The following line is a typical example : 6. a7-a6 7. ~f1-g2 'iVdS-e7 S. 0-0 ILlbS-e6 9. a2-a4!? i H S-e7 10. .lil.e1-e3 0-0 11. 'iWd1-e2 J::!aS-bS 12. f2-f4 lLle6-a5 13. J:[a1-d1 lLla5-e4 14. Jte3-e1
Fianchetto Variation 6. g2-g3 with a complicated game and chances for both sides.
English Attack
This is a positional variation, as are all the lines against the Sicilian that feature a fianchetto. Its aim is to make the ... d7 -dS advance more difficult. How-
6. ite1-e3 This line is very fashionable nowadays. We really should call it the Scheveningen English Attack. Developed in the 1980s, it is above all the work of a group of English Grandmasters - most famously John Nunn, Nigel Short and Murray Chandler. White imitates the Yugoslav Attack against the Dragon with .te3, f3, 'iVd2,
307
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 0-0-0, g4 and h4, in order to start an direct attack against Black's king. Black cannot remain passive in the face of this initiative, so he usually responds energetically in the centre with ... a7 -a6, .. .b7-bS, ... .lW.b7, .. .lLld7 -cS and the thematic ... d6-dS. The resulting positions are very complex, so you will need steady nerves and a good memory. With time the following has established itself as the main line (look at the games at the end of this section): 6. ~c1-e3 a7-a6 7. 'iVd1-d2 b7-b5 S. f2-f3 tt:lbS-d7 h7-h6 9. 92-94 10.0-0-0 £l.cS-b7 11. h2-h4 b5-b4! 12. tt:lc3-a4 'lWdS-a5 tt:l d7-c5 13. b2-b3 14. a2-a3! tt:lc5xa4 'iVa5-c7 15.a3xb4 d6-d5 16. b3xa4 17. e4-e5 tt:lf6-d7 tt:ld7-b6 1S. f3-f4 and Black's compensation for the pawn is difficult to evaluate.
Please note that this variation is classified under the Scheveningen because of convention. In reality, most of the time you will reach it via the Najdorf when 308
White plays 6 ..!te3 (or 6.(3) and Black prefers to play 6 .... e6 - which is often the case - instead of the thematic 6 ... eS, or the modern 6 ... tt:lg4.
The Keres Attack 6. 92-94
The much-feared Keres Attack is the principal bugbear for Scheveningen devotees. White immediately expands on the kingside with decidedly unfriendly intentions. It had its victorious debut in 1943 when it was used by the Estonian champion Paul Keres in a game against Efim Bogoljubow. This was the first of many victories that this attack has notched up, and it has become so feared that many prefer to first play S ... a6 (Najdorf), so that the g4-square is still controlled by two pieces, and only after White replies 6 ..lW.e2, 6.~e3, or 6.f4, transpose with 6 .... e6 to the Scheveningen. However, obviously, the Najdorf leaves you with problems to deal with too. Number one is 6.~gS, as we have already mentioned. Back to 6.g4. Now the moves 6 ... tt:lc6 and 6 ... a6 are playable; but after 7.gS, White has achieved the space advantage he was seeking. For this reason
Sicilian Defence - Scheveningen Variation S ....
h7-hS
To break up White's pawn front and create an outpost on g4. Also here we should underline that there is another possible transposition from the Najdorf. If after S. ...
a7-aS
White plays 7. ~c1-e3 -insteadof7.gS -
is the most popular move for Black. It has its advantages and disadvantages. White's initiative is slowed down, in the sense that if he wants to play h2-h4 and g4-gS he must first defend the rook on hI, and when the pawn advance takes place, the h8-rook can play a more active role. In addition, the extra tempo that is gained allows Black to make the thematic pawn advance ... d6-dS . However, by playing 6 ... h6 Black has weakened his kings ide and castling there is out of the question; yet castling queenside also has its risks. White's most common continuation is
7. h2-h4 8.
ttJb8-cS
J:th1-g1
Now Black usually responds with 8.
...
hS-h5!?
the position has transposed to the Perenyi Attack. This has the ECO code B81, but it is usually reached via the Najdorf (after S... a6 6 .~e3 e6 7.g4!?), and rarely by m eans of the Scheveningen (after 6. iLe3 a6 7.g4). The variation is very dangerous (for both players!). A good example is: 7. 8.
... ttJd4-f5
eS-e5!? g7-gS
Now White is virtually forced to sacrifice a piece with 9. g4-g5 10. e4xf5
gSxf5
and Black, instead of retreating the knight from f6 must respond energetically with 10. ... dS-d5! 11. g5xfS
1 I.'iYf3 d4 12.0-0-0 is another frequent guest of the tournament arena. 309
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 11 .... 12. ~f1-c4
d5-d4
K.A'iV~A
.t.
.t.
.!
.t..t.
!'::,' .t.!'::,
under the Scheveningen Variation . However, Black can also forgo ... a7 -a6 and play other promising lines with ... 4:lxd4 and ... ~d7-c6, or push the pawn to e5 at the right moment. This costs a tempo, but it does break up White's pawn front. Notwithstanding all this,
6. ...
The theoretical implications of recent play from this position have yet to be fully explored.
a7-a6
remains the most played move in response to 6.f4. Usually there follows 7. ~d1-f3 ~d8-b6 with sharp play and possibilities for both sides. For example: 8.4:lb3 'V/Iic 7 9.g4b510 ..liLd3 ~b711.g5 ltJfd7.
Classical Variation Scheveningen with 6.f4
6.
~f1-e2
White has another very interesting line to play against the Scheveningen: 6. f2-f4
This variation is characterized by White playing fairly aggressively without burning all his bridges. This is parlicularly the case when White proceeds (if Black allows) with ~f3 and 0-0-0, and then attacks on the kingside with his pawns. If Black plays ... a7 -a6 you transpose to variations more usually reached by way of the Najdorf, but classified 310
This remains a popular choice. White usually proceeds with ~e 3, f4, 0-0, and a possible a4, ~ hl, and then it is not rare for him to put the bishop on d3, the queen on g3, and after J:[ad 1 or l:i:ael, to get ready for the pawn advance e4-e5. He can also calmly plan a possible g2-g4-g5 push. White's pieces are flexibly placed, and he must be careful to prevent Black's counterplay, which can become very menacing in case White rushes ahead without sufficient thought. For his part, Black can continue in clas-
Sicilian Defenc e - Scheveningen Variation sical fashion by exchanging on d4, in order to put White's centre under pressure with .. ."fic7, ... a7-a6, ...b7-b5, ...~b7 and ... b5-M. If White puts his pawn on a4, to limit Black's activity on the queenside, Black can adopt a type of Hedgehog formation which is very adaptable and difficult to dent. Therefore, as in the 6.f4 line, it has re cently become more popular to forgo the 'Najdorf' pawn advance ...a7-a6, and instead immediately seek counterplay in the centre with ... lUxd4 (obviously after ... lUc6) followed by ... ~d7 -c6 . Alternatively, Black can push his pawn to e5, which simplifies, and gives Black a playable position, even if there are fewer prospects of winning. Another modern set-up, which in the past was underestimaied, is for Black to develop his knight to d7 instead of c6. It is certainly more passively placed h ere and has less influence on the centre. However, if Black manages to successfully complete his development, he can then relocate it actively on c5, or on the c4-square via b6. Of the many plans and strategies available, we will look at the main line, by which we mean the line that is most often played in tournaments: S. ... a7-aS 7. 0-0 ~ fS-e7 S. f2-f4 0-0 9. ~ 91-h1 ~ dS-c7 10. a2-a4 White can also refrain from this and instead opt for the old plan, which is more direct and entails more risk: 1 O.'iVe 1 tUc6 11 .~e 3 tUxd4 12 .~xd4 b5 13.a3 ~b7 14.'iVg3, with sharp play.
10.... l/.JbS-cS 11. ~c1-e3 For the reasons explained above, this pOSition is more often reached via the Najdorf.
Here is an example of the type of play that can follow: 11. ... 1ifS-eS l::!.aS-bS 12. ~e2-f3 13.92-94 l/.JcSxd4 14. ~e3xd4 eS-e5 15. f4xe5 dSxe5 1S. ~d4-a7 l::!.bS-aS ~ eS-dS 17·94-95 1S. ~d1-e2 l/.JfS-eS 19. ~a7-e3 ~cS-eS with a complicated position.
Movsesi;m,Seri~i ;,' ".
Sakaev,Kon.stantin
~: Pallormo Ech blitz 2002 (10) 1.e4 e5 2.tbf3 d6 3.lUe3 a6 4.d4 exd4 5.ttJx·d4 ttJf6 6.g3 a6 7.~g2 'iYe7 8.0-0 tDcS 9.l::te1 !&'e710.tDxeS bxc6 11.e5 dxe5 12.l:!:xe5 0-0 13.j.f4 'iib7 14.tDa4 ' l::td8 15.'iif3 .tDd5 ; 16.~ d2 . ~fS 17.l'le4 e5 .1S.l:Iae1 tDe7 19..b5 l::td5 20.~c3 ;~f5 .. 2ULb4 'iYc7 22.tDbS Irad8 . 23.tDxd5 cxd5 24.g4 $..eS 25.g5 ~xg5 2S:..txe5 'if~c2 . 27.~g3 .i.hS 311
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
2SJ1b7 tLlf5 29.~e3 ~a4 30.'(i'e7 .\:tfS 31.~dS tLlxdS i, 32.'f¥xdS .af4 33.'ife7 WeS 34.h3 ~d6 35Jbe6 1-0
Anand, Viswanathan TopaJov,Veselin Sofia 2005 (I)
n bs ". 23.fS .tea 24 ..b c4 dxe4 2S.'l1Vf3 .id7 26.fxe6 fxe6 27.gS hxg5 2S.hxg5 1:1xh3 29.'iVxh3 fixeS 30.'ifhS+ <;I;>fS 31.tLlf3 , .,*,e3+ 32.<;i;>b2 .aeS 33.'i¥hS+ cJ>'f7 34.~e3 1-0
Fedorov,Alexey
;
Vera,ReynaJdo 1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.tUxd4 tLlf6 5.tLle3 a6 6.~e3 e6 7.f3 b5 co. Linares 2002 (6) ' 1.e4 e5 Vbf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 S.g4 h6 9.'iWd2 b4 10.tLla4 tLlbd7 tLlf6 5.tLle3 a6 6.13 e6 7.i:.e3bS S.g4 11.0-0-0 tLle5 12.b3 iLd7 13.tLlb2 d5 14:.af4 tLlxf3 15.tLlxf3 tUxe4 , hS 9.1Iid2 tDbd710.0-0-0 .ib711.h4 ,b4 , 12.tLla4 'Wa5 13.b3 tDeS 14.a3· 16.'ifd4 f6 17.A d3 . .ltc5 1S...ixe4 20J:txd4 a5 ;.b d4 19.3&.g6+ tLlxa4 15.axb4 'fiIe7 16.bxa4 ' d5 ; 21.n e1 iLeS 22.tLlh4 e5 23.n d2 a4 17.e5 tUd7 1S.f4 tUb6 19 J~h3 tUxa4 24.bxa4 'wgS 25.~g3 d4 26.n d3 20•.if2 .:tea 21 ..ie1 n bS 22.15 .ieS h5 27..b eS 'ifxeS 2S.g5 1:1eS 29.g6 23 ..:tb3 n b6 ' 24.fxe6 fxe6 25.gS J:th6 30.1bd4 n xg6 31.~xg6 1i'xg6 .1i.d726.ifd3 hxgS ' 27.'itg6+ WdS' 32Jld2 :te3 33.ned1 ~h7 34.Wb1 ' 2S.'iYxgS+ 'it'eS 29.J:tdd3 . w b7. 1i'f5 35.i:.e1 fla3 36.n d6 1:1h3 37.a5 30.1:U3 g6 31.'it'b1 flh5 32.fixg6 'WIxe5 33.~f2 1:1hS ' 34.Uf7 .:td6' l1xh2 3S..l:Ic1 'iWe4 39.a6 'ifaS 4O..ixb4 h4 41 ..tc5 h3 42.tLld3 .. 3S.1183 <;I;>aS 36.tIxd7 J:1xd7 37.J:1xa4 ' n d2 43.l;l:b6 h2 44.tLlf2 ~d5 ~d6 3S..:txa6+ Wb7 39.tLlxe6 .:teS 40.1:a7+ ' . ,1 -0 . 45.~e3 1:1e2 4S.J:1b3 f5 47.a7Jbe3 4S.n xe3 , 'iYb7+ 49.nb3 · 'iWxa7 ,'50.tLlh1 f4 51.e4 e4 52.c5 e3 53.e6 ,e2 54.e7,·''Wxe7 55.J:[xe7 eHW+ Keres,Panl . '56.J:[c1 . ·. ' 'ife4+ 57.wa1 'ifd4+ Bogoljubow,Efuit 5S.cJ>'b1 'iWe4+ 59.'iita1 · 'iYd4+ Salzburg 1943 (1) 60.w b1 'lWe4+ V2~V2 1.e4 cS 2.tLle2 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 tUf6 5.tLlc3 d6 S.g4tLlc6 .7.g5 tLlxd4 -, Kasparov,Garry 8.ii'xd4 tUd79•.te3 a6 10•.te2 'fic7. Topalov, Veselin 11.f4 b6 12.15 tUe5 13.1xe6 fxe6 ,. Wijk aan Zee 200] (7) 14.a4 .te7 15.h4 'ii'c5 16.'fiId2 'fie7 1.e4 c5 2.tUf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.tUxd4 17.1:f1 .ltb7 1S..!td4 , 1:1f8 19.0-0-0, tLlf6 5.tLle3 a6 6..lte3 a6 7.f3 b5 S.g4 .:txf1 20.l.1xf1 .adS 21.'Wf4 tLlg6 h6 9.'Wd2 tLlbd710.0-0-0 .tb711.h4 . 22.'ifg4 'fie7 ·23.1WhS e5 ' 24..te3 .b4 12.tLla4 'iWa5 13.b3 tLle5 14.a3 . .ie7 2S.'i¥xh7 tLlf4 26.iLxf4 exf4 tLlxa4 1S.axb4 jfc7 16.bxa4 dS 27..ahS+ wd7 2S.A g4+ 'it'e6 29.'ilff5 17.eS tLld7 1S.f4 tLlb6 19.1:Ih3 tLle4 b5 30.'iYdS+ wbS 31.'Wd4+ wc6 32.tLldS ' 1-0 20.'iWe3 1:1eS 21.~d2 ~e7 22 ..ie1
wts
312
Sicilian Defence - Scheveningen Variation
Karpov,Anatoly ; Dorfinan,Iosif ,,' Moscow ch-URS 1976 (8)
Nevednichy,Vladislav ',' Sax,Gyula v Hungary tt 2001/02 (5)
1.e4 c5 Vbf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLJxd4 1.e4 cS 2.lLJf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLJxd4 ' lLJf6 S.lLJc3 e6 6.g4 ~e7 7.gS lLJfd7 .,' lLJf6 S.lLJc3 d6 6.94 h6 7.~g2 lLJc6 'S.h4 lLJc6 9.il.e3 as 10.,*"e2 'fJIc7 S.h3 i.d7 9.f4 lLJxd4 10.,*"xd4 i.c6 11 ..lte3 il.e7 12.0-0-0 lLJd7 13.'iYd2 ,11.0-0-0 bS 12.lLJxcS 1VxcS 13.~d4. 'it'c7 14.h4 b5 1S.gS lLJb6 16.b3 b4 14.lLJdS exd5 15•.bg7 , UgS J6.exdS 'li'c7 17..ltf6 lLJeS 1S•.be5 0-0-0 17."iWd3 b4 1S.lLJb5 · "iWb7 19.1LJd4 A d7 20....d2 ; d5 21.exd5 dxeS 19.f4 .tfS 20..ih3 ~xh3 '21.nxh3 ':cS 22.fxeS 'li'c4 23J~dd3 lLJxdS 22.lLJfS ~c6 23.lLJxe7+ Wfxe7 ' "tWf4+ 24.~b1 ·· Uc4 2S.d6 lle4 24.Jtd4 lLJc3 25.l:!.de1 tLJbS 26.il.xc6 2S.11he3 Xlxe3 27JIxe3 ~xh4 ·., lLJxd4 · 27:(fg2 "iWc7 2S..bS l:[d7 29.gxh6 gxh6 30.l:!.eS f6 3Ule4 ,2S:Wf3 'iYxgS 29.Ue1 'ii'g2 30."it'fS '.t>bS 32J:td1 l:IhdS . 33.l:Id3 as ~ Xlg6 31.:f1 '*"d5 32.dxe7 <J;;xe7 33:iWf4 a5 34.~h4+'iti>eS 35.'ilixh7 , 34.1:!e1 tLle2+ 3S.~b1 tLlXf4 36J:txd7 lLJxg2 " 37.'uxc7 ' lLJxe1 ;"iVf3 36.WhS+ '*e7 37.'ifh4+ '.t>e8 38.l:te7 " ' .. 0-1 3S.1i'c4 ' "iWb7 39.b3 Ue6 40.Ilg1 Ilxe5 41.J:tgS+ ~e7 42.'ifh4+ 'iti>d7 Timinan,]an '43.'iff6 lle7 44:WfS+ 'it'd6 45."tWxa5 'Ile5 46.'WdS+ ~e6 47.'iti>b2 f6 Smeets,Jan '4S.l:IfS "'g7 49....cS+ . ~d5 Hilversum ch-NED 2006 (6) ," 1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 lLJf6 4.tLlc3 SO:Wc4+ '.?' 1-0 cxd4 S.lLJxd4 a6 6..te3 e6 7.g4 eS ; . Karpov.Anatoly , .'. 8.lLJfS g6 9.gS gxfS 10.exfS dS ;". Sax,Gyula 11:~f3 d4 12.0-0-0 lLJbd7 13.il.c4 t Li_nares 1983 (3) ~'. 'llic7 14.il.xd4 exd4 1SJl heH' lLJeS 16.gxf6 ~d617J:txd4 Ji.d718.i.xf7+ ' 1.e4 cS 2.lLJf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLJxd4 'lLJf6 S.lLJc3 d6 6.g4 h6 7.l:!.g1 '~e7 'Ot>dS ' 19.1WdS lLJxf7 20.'ifxf7 ~c8 :~:! 1..0 ' 'S..lte3lLJc6 9.'lWe2 Ad710.h4 lLJxd4 .... 21.lDd>5 Wa5 22 . b4 :hi.xd4 ' eS 12..lte3 il.c6 13:tWd3 .a5 14.0-0-0 tLJxe4 15.lLJxe4 dS Naiditsch,Arkady ' ;16.1!fb3 dxe4 17.Ac4 IU8 ' 18.11dS Belov,Vla~ir i.xdS 19..bd5 ttdS 20.~c4 .i.b4 Moscow 2007 (2) . '21.c3 .bS 22..i.e2 ~d6 23.'~·dS ~e7 1.e4 c5 2.lLJf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLJxd4 .24.il.cS i.xcS 2S;~xe5+ <J;;d7 lLJf6 S.lLJc3 , a6 6.Jte3 e6 7.g4 eeS ' 26.'{Wxc5 '¥Iic7 27.'tlYfS+ .. <J;;e7 S.tL':)fS g6 9.9S gxfS 10.exfS dS :2S."iWxe4+ wd7 29.~fS+ ~e7 11.gxf6 d4 12.il.c4 'i¥c7 13.'ifd3 ' 30.tte1 J:1d6 31.i.c4+ '.t>dS 32 ..i.xbS dxe3 14.f4 i.b4 1S.0-0-0 A xc3 'a6 33.il.a4 g6 34.'~ff3 <J;;c8 3SJ:te7 ·· 16.bxc3 lLJc6 17.l:thg1 l:tf8 1S:iWxe3 JldH 36.'.t>xd1 'ilixe7 37JWaS+ 'i;;c7 AxfS 19:Wc5 lldS 20.il.dS llxdS 3S:iWa7+'.t>d639.1i'b6+.'. 1-0 ... 21.l:xdS A e6 22.l:td6 exf4 23.ttg7 313
Chess Opening Essen ti al s - Volum e 1
Jid7 24.J:td {' iLea 2S~l:e1 'fr'eS 2SJi'dS Wid7 27.'iYxf4 'fKdS 2SJteg1 : 1i'bS 29.~hS 'tWdS 30.J:t1g2 't/k'a3+ 31.<;!.,d1 fixe3 32J17g3 'ffa1+ 33.';t>d2, 'ti'd4+ 34.~e1 ~a1 + 3S.c;t>d2 tWd4+ 3S.c;t>e1 ~eS 37J%d2 'i\YeS 3S.e3 'iIlYeS 39.'tWf4 ',' '/j"eS 40.~f2 ~aS 41.1Wf4 ~eS
Polgar,Judit , .Kasparov,Garry Geneva rapid 1996 (3)
' .,
112- V2
~
..
~,
"
~<~,
11.g5 ttlfd712 ..td2 ttle513.0-0 ttlcS ' ,14J:ae1 gS 1S.ttldS exdS lS.exdS+ ttle7 17.JiaS ~eS lS.fS ttlxb3 19.fxgS ' 'iYcS+ , 20J U2 b dS 21.gxf7+ ~d7 ' 22 :~g4+ ~eS 23.exb3 ttlgS 24 ..tb4 ttle5 2SJlxeS \txf2+ 26.<;toxf2 dxeS 27.i!.e4 .teS+ 2S..b eS " \t;>xeS 29.b4+ '~d4 · 30.~d1+ ~xe4 ' 31.'Wf3+ cJtd4 32.VWe3+ <;t>c433.'i'ke3X , 1-0 ;
So,Wesley
,'. ",'. " Belov,Vladimir 1.e4 eS V llf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.tbxd4 ttlfS S.ttle3 as S.f4 eS 7.'iYf3 ~bS Mantia 2006 (9) S/llb3 ~e7 9.g4 · bS 10.gS ttlfd7 1.e4 eS 2.ttlt3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.tt:lxd4 ; 11.~e3 ttlbS 12.0-0-0 ttlSd713.'iYh3 -,. tt:lfS S.tt:le3 as S.f4 eS7.YWf3 YWbS b4 14.ttle2 ttlc4 j 1S.~b1 il..b7 S.tt:l b3 'iYe7 9.£l.d3 bS 10.g4 itb7 1S.ttled4 ttlxe3 17.~xe3 g6 1S..ih3 11.gS 4Jfd7 12.'it'h3 gS 13.lU1 .tg7. 14.fS exfS 15.exfS 0-0 lS.i!.e3 UeS ' .'/j"bS 19J1hf1 0-0-0 20.e3 <;t;bS 21.exb4 'iYxb4 22.l:te1 ttleS 23.l:tfd1 17.0-0-0 ttleS lS ..te4 Jixe4 ' Jie7 24.eS ttlxb3 · 2S.axb3 I1eS 19.0 xe4 . ttlbd7 20.li::ixdS ttle4 2S.~f1 ~bS 27.b4 l:thdS 2S.bS axbS 21Jllxc4 bxe4 > 22.fxg6 hxgS 29..b bS dxeS 30:iYxeS+ .tdS 23.J:bd7 .' llxe3 24.l:ttxf7 ~xb2+ ; ;31.'ife3 · J:.xe1+ 32 ..r:txe1 .i.e7 ,. 25.'it>b1 tl. xh32S.J:be7 ~e5 33.ttleS+ .b eS 34.'iYxbS+ h bS . 27.J:tee7 exb3 2S.axb3 IIxh2 29.l:tf1 ' .Yl,.g7 ' ·30.11eS \t,;>h7 . 3UleS .. as 3S.IheS Jie3 3S.J:lc4 l:tdS 37.1%e4 .td2 3S ..teS ' 1itfS . 39.n d4 iUt4 32.Wa2 :teS 33~1%f7 1:1e1 34.b4 a4' 40JldS+ ~e7 4U!d7+ ~eS 42.1.tXf7 3SJbg7+ cJtxg7 3S.bS l:tee2 ". 0-1 '~ c;t>dS 43.tl.xfS exfS 44 ..tf7 we7 ., 37.w b1 ':eS 4S.~gS wfS 4S ..tdS .bh2 47.we2 Jif4 48.wd3 JixgS 49.b4 £l.dS Svidler.Peter SO.c;t>e3 \t;>g7 Sl.Wf4 'it>fS S2.b5 hS Lautier,Joel 53.wg3 g5 S4.wf3 g4+ SS. ~g2 h4 Calvia 012004 (10) 5S.'Ji>f2 -tbS+ S7.g2h3+ SS.'Ji>g3 1.e4 eS 2.tt:lf3 eS 3.d4 exd4 4.tt:lxd4 cJtgS S9.cJth2 ~e7+ SO.cJtg1 g3 0-1 ttlcS S.ttle3 as S.Ae2 dS 7..te3 tpfS ' S.f4 .te7 9:ti'd2!? 0-010.0-0-0 tt:ldi Pantaleoni,Claudio 11 •.tf3 l:l.b8 12.tb~e2 'iYaS 13.tt:l)(eS! Zoldan,Matteo 1Wxd2+ 14J:xd2bxeS 1·S.J:!.hd1 tt:lbS, Bratto 1997 (2) lS..txbSI l:txbS 17.l:I.xdSI± .txdS 1.tt:lf3 dS 2.e4 eS 3.d4 exd4 4.tt:lxd4 lS.J::rxdS eS 19.fxeS .J:teS20.tt:ld4 tt:lfS S.ttle3 eS S.f4 as 7.'ii'f3 ~bS ' ~f8 21.eS h eS 22.eS .te4 23.b3 S.tt:lb3 '(i'e7,.. 9..td3 b5 10.g4 .tb7 . .. .ifl 24.tt:lxeS gS 2S.a4 g4 26..td5
314
Sicilian Defence - Scheveningen Variation
.tIxe5 27J:tdS+ l:leS 2S.J:!d7 l:XeH 29.<;f.;>b2 l:td1 30.l1xf7+ <;f.;>eS 31J:te7+ 'eS- 35.J:l.xg4 w d7 36.lLleS+ w d6 37.lLle4+ A xc4 3S..b c4 ' b6 4S.g4 Jld6 49.w a3 rlg2 50.h3 J:!g3 51.<;f.;>b4 l:td4+ 52.~e3 Jld6 53:i.'e4 .% U3 54.b4+- )';tf4+ 5S.~b3 11f3 .56.<;f.;>a4 11g3 S7.A e4 Jle3 5S..ltd3 '<J.ob7 S9.h4 J:eS 60.g5 hxg5 61.hxg5 ;Itd4 62.g6 1:1g4 63.~fS 1-0
Ljubojevic,Ljubomir Andersson, Ulf l'
WijkaanZee 1976 (3)
·1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 e6 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 lLle6 5.lLle3 'Wie7 6 ..lk.e2 a6 7.0-0 lLlf6 S.~e3 Yl.e7, 9.f4 d6 10.'iVe1 0-0 ' 11.'~g3 A d7 12.e5 dxe5 13.fxe5 ~lLlxe5 . 14.~f4 ~d6 15J%.ad1 'ifbS · 16Jld3 lLleS v 17.lLle4 ll.e7 1S.J::!.e3 o.lLle6 19...be7 lLlxd4 20.~d3 'iVa7 '21.lt:Jc5 ~b5 22.~e5lLle6 23.~xh7+ ''it>xh7 24.l:tf4 f6 25.l:th4+ \tJg8 26.'Wh3 lLldS ' 27.~d4 b6 2S.lLlxe6 ' tbxe6 29.'iVxe6+ ViHf7 30.'life4 g5 .3Ulh6 ria7 32 ..lleh3 'iWg7 33.11g6 :l:.'( ff734.c4 1-0
[_ Fernandes,Antonio Arlandi,Ennio . Leon Ech-tt 2.001 (5)
,
.
.
,1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 e6 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 'lLlf6 5.lLle3 d6 6 ...te3 a6 7.~e2 ~e7 S.f4 ~e7 9.0-0 0-0 10.~h1 · lLle6 .1HWe1 lLlxd4 12..b d4 b5 13.a3 "~b7 14."5'g3 ..te6 15.ttad1 ~b7
16..l1i.f3 ll~eS 17JUe1' b4? 18.axb4 Wxb4 , 19.1LldS! '.bd5 20.~e3 "iVa4 21.exd5 'i'xc2 22.dxe6 lle7 23 ..l1i.e4 ~a4? 24.~xf6 .bf6 25.exf7+ ~h8 26.'i'h3 1-0
Anand. Viswanathan Kasparov,Garry New York Wch m 1995 (9)
1.e4 eS 2.lLlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 lLlf6 5.lLlc3 a6 6.~e2 e6 7.0-0 ike7 S.a4 lLlc6' 9.il.e3 0-0 10.f4 ..Wic7 11.<;f;>h1 lleS 12.~f3 it.d7 13.lLlb3 tba5 14.lLlxa5 Wlxa5 1S.VJkd3 l1adS 16Jlfd1 ~e6 17.b4 Wie7 18.b5 ~d7 19.ttab1 'axbS ' 20.lLlxb5 ~xb5 21.1ii'xb5 l:taS 22.c4 e5 23 ..l1i.b6 1fVca 24.fxe5 dxeS 25.a5 £lf8 26.h3 '*Ye6 27Jld5 lLlxd5? 2S.exdS 'ij'g6 29.c5 e4 30.it.e2 J:te5 31.Wid7 J:[g5 32.1',1g1 e3 · 33.d6 n g334.l\Vxb7 , '*Ye6 355.t;>h2 1-0
Adams,Michael Topalov, Veselin . Wijk aan Zee 2006 (2)
1.e4 c5 2.lLlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 lLlf6 5.lLlc3 a6 6.A e2 e6 7.0-0 Jie7 S.a4 lLlc6 9.Jie3 0-0 10.f4 'fIfe7 11.'
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
Sicilian Defence Sozin-Velimirovic Attack 1.e4 c5 2. ~ f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4"~xd4 .~J6 5. ~c3 t.;c6/a6
6 ...ic4
In this section we will discuss the variations in which White plays ~c4 on the 6th move against the Scheveningen, the Najdorf, or the Classical Sicilian. It is evident that there are many strategic similarities and transpositions, and thus it seemed logical to look at them together rather than in the respective sections for each variation. The development of the bishop to c4 gives a clear strategic quality to each variation. The Russian master Veniamin Sozin (1896-1956), whose name has become attached to this system, was not the first to play 6. i1Lc4. You can see examples of it being played occaSionally in some 19th century games. However, Sozin was the first to show what White's best plan is in some games that were played in the 193 Os. This plan is to combine ~c4 with the advance f2-f4 and a pos316
sible further advance to f5, in order to rapidly apply pressure on e6, and thus add some sense to the development of the bishop to the a2-g8 diagonal, where it would otherwise be less influential. It is not without reason that the game plan of the highly popular English Attack, i.e. the pawn advances f2 -£1, g2 -g4 and h2-h4, does not include the development of the bishop to c4, and indeed in the Sozin this pawn configuration proves to be largely ineffective. The only exception, in this sense, is the main line of the Dragon, in which this set-up does include ~c4. However, in this case the bishop only has the prophylactic role of preventing ... d6-d5. Another great advocate of the deployment of the fl -bishop to c4 during the 1960s was the future 11 th World Champion, Bobby Fischer, who came up with many new ideas for White and for Black! In recognition of his many contributions, some experts attach his name to Sozin's when denoting the whole system. However, we will call it by its usual name.
Fischer Attack 7 . ~b3 is called the Fischer Attack only ifit is played in the Najdorf; that is, after a7-a6 5. ... 6. ~f1-c4 e7-e6 or via the Scheveningen (5 ... e6 6.i1Lc4) when Black plays 6 ... a6. 7. ~c4-b3!? With this precautionary retreat by the c4-bishop to b3, White is making a move that will be necessary sooner or later (even if 7.0-0 and 7.a3 are both playable).
Sicilian Defence - Sozin- Velimirovic Attack S .... .l¥.f8-e7! The old main line was 9.f4 0-0 10.eS dxeS 1 l.fxeS lDfd7, which is now slightly out of use, since Black has more than adequate resources. 9. ~d1-f3!
Black usually seeks immediate counterplay on the queenside with the manoeuvre ... lDbd7 -cS, or with ...b7 -bS. We will first take a look at 7 ... lD bd7 , which is fashionable at the moment, but which was considered to be theoretically bad in the past. It was played more than once by Kasparov in his 1993 World Championship match against Short. After 8.f4 lDcs
practice has shown that Black's position is perfectly playable. Now back to 7 .~b3. 7. ..• b7-b5 White continues more often than not with S. 0-0 The direct 8.f4 followed by f4-fS is playable, but does not give more than equality.
This has now become all the rage. Played by Fischer in 1960, its real popularity began when Kasparov adopted it in the 1990s. Here we have a rare case where play, when restricted exclUSively to pieces, proves to be dangerous. Black's problem is that the threat of 10.eS cannot be prevented with the natural-looking 9 .. .~b7 because of 10 ..lii.xe6! fxe6 Il.lDxe6, with a strong attack. Therefore play proceeds with 9. ... 'iWdS-c7 1O. ~f3-g3 0-0 11 . .lii.c1-h6! tt:Jf6-eS Now White has an unpleasant kingside initiative. However, with correct play, Black should be able to maintain the balance. Now we will look at how w e can get to this position via the Classical Sicilian: 1. e2-e4 c7-c5 2. tt:Jg1-f3 d7-d6 c5xd4 3. d2-d4 317
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 4. ttlf3xd4 ttlgS-fS ttlbS-cS 5. ttlb1-c3 S. ~f1-c4 e7-eS We will now examine the positions where White does not develop his queen to £3, but instead to e2, with both kingside and queenside castling. The most common continuation is 7. ~c1-e3 a7-aS
With the move 9.~e2 you transpose to a Velimirovic Attack in which White has retreated his bishop a little prematurely to b3. This allows ... tLJaS, but with the difference that White cannot retreat the bishop to d3, as you can in the standard Velimirovic line.
S. ~c4-b3 The more flexible 8.0-0 (for 8.Wfe2 see the Velimirovic Attack further on) 8 ... ~e7 9 .~b3 0-0 10.f4 tLJ xd4 11..~.xd4 bS n.eS dxeS 13.fxeS tLJd7 14.tLJe4 ~b7 lS. tLJd6 ibcd6 16.exd6 'iWgS
We can call this position the Classical Sozin, as it was played this way in the 193 Os. White searches for a balance between aggressiveness and solidity, and he prepares an initiative on the kingside without burning all his bridges behind him.
9. ... 10. ~d1-f3
0-0
Velimirovic Attack
leads to a complex position that is difficult to assess. S .... ~fS-e7 9. f2-f4 318
Here is another famous variation where White's light-squared bishop is developed to c4. You should note that White can only enter this variation if Black plays the Classical Sicilian (1.e4 c5 2.tLJ£3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4. tLJxd4 tLJf6 S.tLJc3 tLJc6). S. ~f1-c4 e7-eS 7. ~c1-e3 ~fS-e7 7 ... a6 8.'tWe2 Wic7 9.0-0-0 ~e7 is a transposition of moves. S. 'iVd1-e2
Sicilian Defence - Sozin-Velimirovic Attack
White's idea is to prepare queenside castling while keeping control of g4, to be able to push the g-pawn without the need to play f2 -f3. It became popular in 1965, following some brilliant victories by its creator, the Yugoslav GM Dragoljub Velimirovic. It was sometimes played by Fischer; he used this variation in a famous game with Larsen in 1 970, which he lost. This aggressive line has never achieved the popularity of the Richter-Rauzer : probably because most players prefer not to play such a one-dimensional line, and instead would rather play something strategically more complex. Black generally continues with S. ... a7-a6 9. 0-0-0 'iVdS-c7 10. ~c4-b3
This is a prophylactic move, which is necessary to be able to play g2 -g4. Now Black must choose. He can leave the king in the middle and play on the queenside with 10 .. .tLla5, exchanging it for the bishop on b3, but this leaves White with the strong knight on d4. Instead, Black can immediately play 10 ... 0-0. In the latter case, White's plan is the brutal manoeuvre g2 -g4, I:Xh1-g1-g3-h3 and, then g4-g5, ~e2-h5-h7 checkmate! However, Black will not just sit there twiddling his thumbs, and in practice it is difficult to pull this off. A)
11. 92-94
This is best met by 11 ....
tLlc6xd4
when White must recapture with the rook, since 12.1i.xd4 eS 13.1i.e3 Jixg4 14.13 iLe6 gives no compensation for the sacrificed pawn. 12. .l:[d1xd4
This prevents 12 ... e5 thanks to 13.J:l.c4 (gaining a tempo by attacking the queen) followed by g4-g5 and tLlc3-d5 . Therefore, Black continues with 12. ... 13.94-95 14. J:l.h1-91
b7-b5 tLlf6-d7 tLld7-c5
319
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I and White can try and add some sense to the rook's placement on d4 by clearing the way to h4 with 15.e5!? Black would be wise to not accept the proffered pawn immediately; instead he should respond with I5 ...d5 I6 .l:!.h4 'iYxe5, with a position that is not easy to evaluate. B)
However, at this point White can playa courageous two-piece sacrifice: 13. ttJd4-f5!? 14. ~ b3-d5!?
b7-b5
11. llh1-91
11. ...
ttJf6-d7
11.. .b5 12 .g4 b4 13 .tLlxc6 ~xc 6 14. tLld5 is another highly sacrificial line. ttJd7-c5 12.92-94 Now the normal continuation would be I3.g5.
320
For examples of these lines, see the games at the end of this section. As you have doubtlessly noted, when you play these variations, you are living on a razor's edge. Exhilarating perhaps, but not to the taste of every black player, who has alternatives such as ...tLlc6-a5xb3, or postponing kingside castling and first mobilizing his queenside pawns. To finish we have prepared a table (see next page) which presents the various systems in which White can play ~c4.
Sicilian Defence - Sozin-Velimirovic Attack ~.,
A) Classical Sicilian 1. e2-e4 ,'. 2. tbgH3 3. d2-d4 i 4. .tbf3xd4 5.tbb1'·C3 . 6: ~f1-c4 ,c" <
" c7-c5
'I;:
,,,,,"t'.
6 .... 7. ~c4·b3
~fS-e7
:.
d7~d6
c5xd4 tbgS-f6 l¢:!bS-c6
.. ,:Now Black could defer the 'Najdorf :.. a6 and 'directly play his knightto c5 .via a6, . preparing to " exchange it for the light-squared bish9P when he chooses to, 6...4Jc6 would transpoSe to subseCtion 1), Please note: afterthe normal6 ...e6, the head for either the C) -Najdorf game: :'''. 1. e2-e4 Velimirovic Attack : or ·· the Classical c'':. 2. tbg1-f3 Sozin,' ButBtack can avoid this and enter less t;heoreticallin'es like 6,,:.id7 or> 3. , d2-d4 ,.' 4. ,·tbf3xd4 the more popular 6 .. Jj'b6. Then, 'after ' 5; tbb1-c3 7.lLJdbS, or 7.4:lb3, youreachpositions 6. ~f1~c4 which are ; similar .t~ the Classical Sche~eningen: '; 7 ... a6 8.~e3 'it' c7 ; 9.$.e2 ; Do not jorget about the common er~or 6, ..g6?7.0.xc6bxc6'S.e51, ,;." '
will ,
c7-cS ,. " d7-d6 cSxd4 tbgS-f6 , a7-a6 e7-e6
.....:.
B) ' Scheveningen ', . 1. ' e2~e4 c7-c5 ~" . ,,: 2. ' tbg1~f3 d7·d6 ~" , 3. d2-d4 c5xd4 < .. :; 4. . .tbf3xd4 tbgS-f6 '.: ,,' .. ", ,' , 5. " tbb1';c3 , ;'. e7-e6 , .,t:::.~--"'=:"'::::'-=-----."""".=J " 6; :' kf1-c4 ",' . ,,' ..... Now, after ..\¥..c4 is less frequently played against'the : '" 7. .i.c4-b31? scIievenitigen than against the Najaorf '. We h~ve the Fischer Attack, 7,0-0 is also the Classical Sicilian because of the playable. The alternative 7,.\te3 is ambi~ popuhirity ofi:heKeres Attack. dous ,but double-edged; after 7.,.bs Here, Black .can avoid the. usual set-up 8,~b3 h4!?, it isn't clear If White will get by not playing .. ,tbc6, for example: " .-"., :.~ suffident compensation fo):, the e4-pawu, ;
or
321
Chess Opening Essentiols - Volume 1
'<>" Sh-;;rt;Nig~r
; ., . ~
, ; t '~~J.::"'i;;:'~~';6'·27:
';' Kasparov,Garry ",
'ii'fS':; 's1;~ 7 28.i~;4+~ ~d6'l
, .::i; ,,:'.,' 29.i.fd3+ ~' <.te6 ,' 30.'+lfg6+",:: rJ;rd7
'f London Weh m 1993 (8) " , ; , .:'.-: 31,t;:ic4 " llad8 ;,,32.'iWd6+ ' 'iite8' .1.e4 cS 2.tbf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tDxd4 ~··, , . 33.'iVe6+ ,' ~8 : 34:iWf6+~gS ;'4:lf6 S.4:lc3 ' a66.~c4 , e6 -7•.1t..b3 ,:' .> 3S.W96+ ,:Jif8 36.h3 ·llg837.'il:Yf6+ "ttlbd7,8.f4 tDcS 9.eS dxeS 10.fxeS ":' ~eS 3S.lDd6·': "" ,; .;;:.:,;,.; ..;, 1-0'
;~:d71!~:;:~:s;~·~~~:.g_~~;::t,' , , Fis~er:~~b~;t;""
.
<,}:::~
1 16.~c6! tL)xb3+ 17.axp3 <;. Wc5 ,: ,' ..:"' Rubmettl,Jorge .... \" ;~r· ,. ',( -i ~ 1S.tDe4!; 'lIVxc6 19.hgS , ~b7 ' , iilmadeMaiiorca,19'7. 0 (1l) ,,<: ', 20.l:!d61l iid6' 21.tDxd6+' M8 " 1'.e4 cS2.tbf3 d63.d4 'cxd4, 4.tiixd4· ' 22 ..r:tf1 c, ,;tDxeS 23~'iYxe6 :'";,1!fdS ' ,; 4:lf6 .S.tpc3 e6, 6::i.c4 a6 7~~b3 bS' , 24.11xf7+lItDxf7 c 2S.~e7+~g7CL ' S.O-O .llb7 9.11e1 : t.Dbd7 : 10.~g$ h6 ; 26.'~lf6+ ~' 'itti7 271i"Xf7 " ¥WhSO', "'::' 11.~h4 ~C5 12~d5exd5 13.exdS+, ' 2S.lbgS+ ~gS ": 29:ili'e6+", 'J;'g 7 " :"'" <J;;d7 14.b4 tDa41S.tt'lxa4 bxa4 16:<::4 , 30.'i!Yf6+ ' Wg8 31.'lIVe6+ '>t>g7 ': ?'~8 ' 17.'iWxa4 ; 'iVd7 '1S.'iVb3 . g5 , ~ 32 ..llf6+ wh6 . 33:tbf7+ ' ''~h7 "; 19.,tg3 . tDhS " 20.C5 dxc521.bxcS· :'34.tZlgS+ ',·'; ~h6 : <, 3S.:bhS+,. ''ifxdS 22JleS+ wd7 23:iia4.f. ,'·. ac6', : [35.lDf7+±] 35... 'if96, 36.t;:Jf7*.:'it>h7 ' 24:lbxC:6 ' :,' .. I ,it· · · \ ;. .1~0 : 37.~e7 ., 'ilfxg2? :;· [3L ..>f;g8!!] "{ < " , \ . '" .~ , ~ ' 38.AeS? [38 ..lld4!+-:-} 38...1Yf1+:= "::. . '" ,,'" .::,~ •39:~d2 ~,' "'f2+ .... '40.~d3 i.' '1ff3+ ' ' M6rozevich,Alexandei 41.~d2. "'f2+ [,A.nother example . (in ,,,: Kasparov,Garry . I
J
: addition to Fischei~Gelle~) "of th'e , tre~: ··· ." ASUna2001 '(3) ',;;,;> ,:. "." ..• " , mend?us .complexity of. the Sidlhm: " 1.e4 cS 2.tDf3,d6 3.d4 cxd4 '4.tDxd4, '. even the players in the'wo~ld c~ii·",. tzJf6 S:ib'c3 a6 6 ..llc~ ~67.ii.b3 bS; ' make serious ,mfstakes in thes·~compli~:'~!/.. S.O-O ' .ae 7 g:~'f3 'tWc7.:1OJ!f g3 0-0 . ;catedvariations] , " ,; WY2 ;,':: 1Ut h6 ',¢e8 ;:12.:ad1':, ~d7 13.f4 ~ .. ..' ' ; ; ,tDc6 .:' 1~.fS tDxd4 < 1SJ:txd4 "tJtf6 . )"" .,;, 16":d3 ~eS 17.'~ig4 b4 ·, 18.f6 g6
best
,
~,
.'
Nisip~~llU,llviU-Di~tt~r '" Grischuk,Alexander "
""
•.
19.1Je2 ' as' 20.Ji.xfS~x.fS . 21~\wh4:
,~ a4 " 22.~,xh,. 'iVa7+ ;' 2~~h1 ,tpxf6
. " : :;, .. " ,, 24:ifh6+lt>e7 2S.~c4 ' 'i'cs 26.b3 1.e4 c5 2.0f3 d6 .3.d4 cxd4 4.0xd4 :':" axb3 27.~xb3 ' ib5 , 28.lDf4 ··Axf4 tDf6 ' S.tDc3 a6 6~c4 · e6 i ..tb3 :29.'fi'xf4 ~eS ' 30.h3 95 31:~'f2 'g4 ' ' tDbd7 S...tgS h6 9.kxf6'ii'xf6 .10:0-0 32:ifYb6 , tL:sd7 ' 33."-f2 tDf6 ' 34.1Yb6' ,gS 11.f4 ~g712.eS dxeS '13.fS e4 \ .'~ l:!h8 35.~xd6 :, 'iVxd6 , 36~~xd6+: ,14.tZ'ice2 exfS · 1S.:txfS 'ifb6 :16.liXf7 ;;, ~xd6 37.1:!xf6 ; llh7,. 38.~h2 .;~eS" ;~f6 ., 17....d2 tLIeS1S.l:IxfG ''ifxf6 .' 39.11f2 ·' gxh3 40.gxh3 ..tc641:~c4 ;19.1.U1 ~b6 20.tDC3''' tDc6 21.:~.f7+ ·~' <~.xe4 ., 42.li~2 : fS'::; 43.:td3";'~f42 ,~d8~2.¥i'f2 'i!fxd4 23.l:Id1 'iYxd1 + . <: ,\' 44.,~Xe4 fJ(e4 '4S ..r:tf2+·;<;fie~ 46:l:IfS ' ' 24.tDxd1.'>t>e7 2S.tiJe3 .ie6 26.Jixe6. L. eS ~:·,47.l1eS., Jlc7.,;,,,4,S,nxeS .,,>f;f4 : :" Foros 2006 (8)
322
Sicilian Defence - Sozin-Velimirovic Attack
r· ....,.. ;49.l:1b5 , " I1xe2-i; ~' "' ~" "'"
'.4\--.....
';.I
·· :":;LIlI,i:"':::""~"""·K
' "
•• ~,,~
" .t-: ~ '". ,~.C:~
.. "'""
.\,,,, .~;,,,,,,., .
It'.'! ".<'
.,,' ." ·" ..·'p, .... ~c
,,' 27:.L:e6+ ',, ~f6l] 2S ...g51 '. [26 .. :"*'xb21?127Jf g4 .te5! 28.lbb5 ,', It>g7 " 29.lbd4 llhS?1 [29 "Jld8] 30.ttJf3 " .bf3 ' 31.'t!Yxf3 ~dS? , ,'(3 Lllh4!+] :~ ' 32.'tWc3 ~xe3, , " Megar'arito.Susanto . ,', 33.bxe3= .teS 34.1:!.d7 wfS 35.Wg1. ,~, DomingUez,Lenier " .be3 " 3S.~e2 i.e5 · 37.""fl l:teS ; ,;, rdrin 'bl :?006 (7) ;'/ 38.Jl.h5 1:!.c7 39..ttxe7 ilxe7 40.a4 ~1.e4 e5 ~/9f3 d6 3.d4 exd44.tLixd4",;: we7 41.We2 f542.Wd~ .i.eS 43.c4 1/2-V2 ;lbfS 5.lbe3 as S.it.c4 eS 7..ib3 b5 ' It>dS44.£t.f7~g34S.eS+ 'S.O-O 1ie7 9.'fi'f3 'fIIe7 10.'{!ig'3 0-0 , ", '. ~, i 11.£i.hS tbe8 i ,12.:.Iadl ·.td7 13.a3 :' ",~ Friedel,Joshua ' , " ; tLle614.lbxe6 ' .\txcS '15.J:tfel : 'jbf '",'; . Zavadskf,Peter ',' ~ lS.f3 .. a5 ,17.lbe2' a4 :; lS.~a2 , b4 Las Veg~ 2006(2) _, ','" ; 19.axb4 ~xb4 20.SLe1lbf6 21 A:id4 , ..', 1.e4 eS 2.tbf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.lbxd4 "ii.d7 22:'iff2 IUe8 23.94 ii.bS 24;63 '" : tLlf6 5.tZJe3 lbeS S.i.e4 eS 7.0-0 k e7 ; ~aS 25.eS ' dxeS ";,26:J:txe5 :, !:te5 ;,;, 8~.te30~0 ' 9~b3 ' as 10.14 'fie7, :27.J:l:ee1 ~c4 : 28~bl \i'e7 29.f4 :gS (" ' lUt e2 b512.f5 lbxd4 13.it.xd4 b4' ' 30:h3 i.dS ' 31.it.d3 J:I bS ' 32.f5 :gxf5 :. 14.fxe6 " bxe3 15.exf7+ ' , .ttxfi ~ 33.gxf5 ""hs ,34.fxeS llg8+ 3S. lS:it.xt7+ "wxf7 " 17.'iY'hS+ c;t>gS ~tLlh5 3S.exf7 lbg3+ '37.Wgl lbe2+·?"':,lS..txI6 ," ~a7+ 19.w h1 , gxfS :3S.Wfl l2:\g3+39.<;iiglltle2+ 40.<J;;f120."ii'd5+ '~f8 ·21.bxc3 'ifb7,22.'ifh5 ;;, ,'l!Yxe4 23.'Wh6+ wf7 24.J:1ae1 'i!fgS' ·,tb93+41;Wgl ' ,> , .:;25.1i'e3 jLf8 2S.iYe8+ '.t>g8 2UieS i'~ Fisch;;,Robert. , ~b8 '2s.~e7 l:taS :29..l:If3 ~h8 ' ; " Spassky,Boiis ,"",," ,\. .. ",'- ~, 30.:g3~hS31.~c4 1-0 ~ 'Reykjavik ,Wch~ 19n,(4) :" .}, , " ,... ,. :, , ~11.e4..'e 5' 2.ltlf3 dS 3.d4 'cxd4 4.lbxd4 ' " Fischer,Robert> , .' ".. , ,., ' • ' ,', ,lbfS "5.lDe3 , ~eS S..tc4 · as ' 7..tb3 , ~ ,;:{ Geller,Efun ' ... f.\ie7 S:ie30·0' 9.0-0 as ,10.f4lbxd4 "" Skopjel967 (2) '" , t ' 11 ..bd4 b5,12;a3 [12.eS (this Js'the ' ·' 1.e4 e5 2.lbf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 '4.tt:Jxd4' 1 '", .. ' , '-", '. ' , , . , ' ', " " main line) 12.;;dxe5 " I$.fxe5 ' lbd7 liJfS S.ttJe3 . tZle6 6:~e4 e6 7.it.e3 14~tt:Je4 it.B7 ' ls.lbd6 ~xd6 : 16.exd6 ,' i.e7-: S.~b3 0-0 9:i1i'e2 'iVa5 :WgS : ) 7J:tf2;';':·'i 17.'~ezj ; 12 ...it.b7 ',, 10.0~c)~O ':'tbxd4 , , 11.Axd4 .td7 ! 13.~d3 a5 14.e5 dxe5'15.fxe5lbd7 "-, 12.wb1 /'Sit.cS? , [~: 1:LJlfc8] 13.f4 I:tadS 14.:thfl bS 15.fSII b4 lS.fxeS! tlS.tbxbS , tbe5 ;\17.i.xcS >",1.xc5+ · 18.~hl 1Wg519>"e211adS 20:nadl ' ,.bxe3 : 17.exf7+ [1 ?J1Xf6!] 17.:.'.t>hS: i't(xdl 21:.ttxd1 ,h5[21 ;,:.Sit..e3t 'n tiJd6 1' lS..ttfSI JWb4 19." fll -tbxe4 20.a3? ~ ~C6 '23.lbc4 ikf4 24..t>g 1 a4,: 2S .~a2 [20,.f4!!+~120:..'iVb7 21.'iWf4 it.a~!! ~ hS+122.
e3 ; 5U1xb~+ , ~f3 "<, 52.11bl , l:lg2+ ! 53.Whl e2 54.a4 ~f2 55.a5 :%gS ' 5S.Wh2 1haS 57.h4 :la3 "0-1 , ~-"" " :" ',", " ";" ' >
,t
'"
,
,
,i
,.tm '",.-.: ,
323
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume I
0:0' 1'0:0=0-0-
,: veli;rurovi~,Dragoijub"'~J.-?"';( ~ ;':-:"~~"7 8.1br~6 '9:j~2' , ,:, Sofrevski,Jovan , ,; 'fiIe7 1Uthg1 b5 12.g4 b4 13.tZlxe6 Titograd ch-YUG 1965 (7) :" 'irxe6 14.tZld5 exd5 1S:g5 tZlxe4 ,1.e4 e5 2.tZlf3 lUe6 3.d4 exd4 , 16;~xdS 1!Va4 17.Ad4 ~fS 1Sb e4 ,4.tZlxd4e6 S.ttJe3 d6 6.~e3 ttJf6 1Ue4 19.'ifxe4 " flxa2 , 20.ifxe7, l%ae8 21.~e7 . lle422..1Le3 . tIc4 · 7.~c4 ~e7 8.ife2 a6 9.0-0~0 Wie7 · 10.~b3 tZlaS 11.g4 bS 12.gS tZlxb3+ 23.'Wxd6 b3 24.'iitd2 lIxe2+, 25.~e1 ~ 13.axb3 tLJd7 14.tZlfS exf5 1S.tt:ld5 ·· fgxb226.~d3 ' a5 27.l::tg4 ,. %:te3 ",,"d8 16.exfS 0-0 17.f6 gxf6 18.~d4 · ';: 28.'ilfd2 l:te2 . 29.WJd3 ' lre3 30.ife4· ttJe5 19.9xf6 ,.bf6 20.rlhg1+ ~g7 ~a3 '( ,3Uth4 ,: g6 ' 32 ..td4 : J:[e1 ;21.~xeS dxeS 22.'WixeS f6 23.ttJe7+ ' ; 33.l:!.xh7 .'; 'ilfb4+ . 34;we2 ': lle2+. wf7 24.'ir'h5+ ., 1-0;} 3S.<;t;>f3 ~xd4 36Jbd4. ~Xh7 1-0, "
!,; .
',.
Fedorov,Alt;xej ,
/;. :'
, Lutsko,Igor Minskch-BLR.2005 (1)
'"
~ So.kolov,Andrey :;,h,:~ ' Salov, Valery ,,,
."
,
"
~.
Nikolaev 1983 "..
'1.e4 e5 2.ttJf3 ttJe6 3.d4exd4 '··· 1.e4 <:5 2.~f3 · ttJe6 3.d4 cixd4 :4.ttJxd4 .pf6 . 5.ttJc3 d6 6•.ite4 e6 ,r, 4.tZlxd4 "ttJf6 S.tOe3 d6 6.~c4 e6 · 7..ie3 a6 8.'iWe2 'fie7 9.0-0-0 it.e7 · 7..te3a6 a.iYe2 'ire7,9.0-0-0 i.e7 ,10i b3 0-0 :1Ulhg1bS 12.94 b4 '; ,,10..tt>307011.n hg1 tZld712.g4 tZleS' 13.ttJxe6 'ifxc6 14.ttJd5 exd5 1S.gS 13.tZlfS bS ,14.it.dS .i.b7 15.g5eXfS f tOxe416..txd5 " a4 17id4 ~f5 ; ,16.g6 hxg6 17"!bg6 0 eS18.l:1xg7+ ' 18...be4 it.xe4 19.iI'xe4 ; Ilfe8 ,. ' ~xg7 19.1:tg1+ ,0g6 20.exf5 :thS' · 20.~b1 ~fS 21.'fid3 'ii'c6 22.h4 fie4 ~;; 2L~d4+ .tf6 22.fxg6 fxg6 23.'ifg4 23.h5 %:taca .24.$.e3 lIe6 ' 2S:Wxe4 , lIh6 24.~xf6+ ~h7 . 25.%:te1 'jLxdS l n xe4 ~ 26.l:tdS .r.:tec4 '· 27.1:teL Jl.e7 26.ttJxdS " ife8 ' 27.J:Ie7 ..t>gS; 2S.b3 l:te4 29.l:I.cd1 n e6 30.l:t5d4 ; c 2S.J:tg7+ ., 'iows ", 29.l:tgiH ' ~xgS ·l:I.xd4 3Ulxd4 as 32.11d5 ii.dS . 30.tLle7+ '" ". " 1-0 33.lIbS wfS 34.i.c:f4 %:tcS'3S.'iitb2 96 ' ,,',; ., " .,.... 36.hxg6 hxg6 37.e3 bxe3+' 3S..be3 Fedorov;AIexey > , " ~eS 39..txaS ·.txaS 40Jatxa5 wd7 ", '. Lanka,Zig'urds , " . " ~ · 41.a4 l:th8 42.tta7+ ~e6 43.Id.e7 Pula Ech-tt1997(SY . ..-' ",. ·l:th2 44J:te2 l:Ig2 45.a5 n xgS 46.b4 . · 1.e4 ., CS "' 2.0f3 ' ttJe6 ' 3.d4 exd4' l:tbS 47.~b3 dS 4S.a6 rIbS 49.<;f;a4"." 4.tZlxd4 . tOf6 S.lUe3 ' d6 "6 ..te4 e6' d4 50:bS dS S1.a7 : as S2.b6 d3 : 7.~e3 JLe7 S.~e2 a6 ' 9.0-o-o ild ' 53:J:J:d2 \lte6 54.'iPaS ' , 1-0 ,'" 10.Ji.b3 0-0 1U::hg1 ttJd7 .; 12~g4; " tZle5 13.tZlfS b5 14:il.d5 .tb7 1S.gS Movsziszian,Karen lacS 16.: 93 ttJeS 17.i:th3 ttJg6 Spraggett,Kevin .,,'. 1S.iVh5 tZlfS" 19.ttJxg7 ,bdS .' Tarragona 2006 (4) , :,: 20.'ii'h6 eS 21.ttJhS tOee6 22~exd5 . .,1.e4 e5 2.ttJf3 d6 3.d4 ttJf6 4.ttJe3 '" b4 23.dxe6 , tZlxe6 24.ttJf6+ :txfS' exd4 S.tZlxd4tOe6 6.~e4 e6 7~e3 .~" 25.gxf6 " , : " .::, :, , .. -"" 1_0'
+.
/';'1 j
324
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf Variation
The advance ...a7 -a6 on the 5th move is the move that defines the NajdorfYariation. It has become the most popular of all Sicilian variations. This is hardly a surprise, as it was the mythical champion Bobby Fischer's favourite choice during the 1960s and 1970s. In addition, from the 1980s on, Gary Kasparov used it almost exclusively. Champion players have always dictated chess opening fashion. We may not be able to play like these guys, but we can at least play their openings! Played by Esteban Canal as far back as 1929 (!), 5 ... a6 was also used by the Czechoslovakian Karel Opocensky in the 1930s. It became popular in the 1940s and acquired its name in honour of the Polish-Argentinian player Miguel Najdorf (191 0-1997), one of the strongest non-Soviet players after the Second World War.
We are dealing with a very flexible concept: Black plays the move ... a6, which is always useful in the Sicilian; he maintains the option to advance the pawn to e6 (transposing to the Scheveningen) or to e5, depending on the circumstances and the personal taste of the player. This is Kasparov's approach, and he generally opted for ... e6 when White chose positional continuations such as 6.iLe2. Fischer, on the other hand, preferred to remain in the spirit of Najdorf with the thematic pawn advance to e5. You should note that the move 5 ... a6 is played to make ... e7 -e5 possible without receiving check on b5: if 5 ... e5 is played immediately, it gives the white knight advantageous access to the f5-square, as explained in the section on minor variations after 2 ... d6. A reader may well ask why a move like ... e5 is so important in the Najdorf, given the hole it creates on d5? The answer lies in the fact that the Najdorf is at heart an ambitious line that aims to put the e4-pawn under pressure! In the Open Sicilian, with the white d-pawn gone, and the f-pawn on f4, the 'poor' e-pawn is subject to attack by the When the adversary's pieces. hypermodernists prauocatively claimed that 1.e4 was an error, they may have been partially correct! Black blocks the path of the
e4-pawn with ... e5, preventing that extra step forward that is so dangerous in the standard variations: he then exchanges on f4 and begins to attack it with ... b5 to develop the bishop to b7, with ... 4.Jd7 -c5 and sometimes with .. .n e8. In some exemplary games by Fischer and other Najdorf experts this plan is carried out brilliantly. 325
Ches s Opening Essential s - Volume I Naturally, the ... e5 push does not always work in Black's favour. It does not take much to fmd yourself in strategically lost positions, as some of the young Karpov's adversaries discovered the hard way. That said, it is understandable that 6 ..tg5 was the first and most popular anti-Najdorf continuation, since with the f6-knight already pinned, the move 6 ...e5 creates a weakness on d5 which is more easily exploitable by White than in the other variations.
This could be a good idea for those who do not want to get bogged down in too much theory. It prevents ... b7 -b5, therefore it cannot be bad. C)
6. g2-g3
We will now have a look at White's alternatives on the 6th move. A)
6. J:th1-g1
The Fianchetto Variation is relatively popular with players who like quiet positions. After 6 .. .e5, the knight can retreat to e2 or to b3, in both cases with a slow positional struggle. Naturally, ... e7 -e6 leads to positions dealt with in the section on the Scheveningen Variation.
D)
6. h2-h3
Recently this strange move has appeared, which is played with the idea of a g2-g4 advance. B)
6. a2-a4
This is the move that Bobby Fischer played a few times when he had to fight against the Najdorf himself. White's idea includes a g2-g4 pawn advance 326
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf Variation and, if Black plays ... e7 -eS, to retreat the knight to e2 and then reposition it on g3. However, with 6 ...e6! Black can transpose to the Scheveningen, in which h2-h3 is of doubtful use. E) 6. ~f1-d3 Of the minor variations, this b est justifies the idea of the Najdorf's 6 .. .eS: after 7. tlJde 2
Black obtains a comfortable position with ... tlJbd7 and ... bS. Please note the valid opportunity to exploit the fact that the d4-knight is undefended with 6 .. .tlJc6 and also 6 ... g6. We shall now turn to lhe 'serious' options, at least from a statistical frequency viewpoint. F) 6. ~f1-c4 We have already discussed this move in the section on the Sozin-Velimirovic Attack. G)
6. f2-f4
An interesting move. It is sufficiently
aggressive and there are not too many variations that you have to remember.
In Najdorf style there is 6. ... e7-e5 Black can also opt for 6 ... e6, which transposes to the Scheveningen, or he can choose the flexible 6 ... ~c7 or 6 ... tlJbd7. 7. ttJd4-f3 ttJbS-d7 S. a2-a4
Preventing ... b7-bS. ~fS-e7 S .... 9. ~f1-d3 The ambitious 9 .~c4 is also playable here. 9.... 0-0 10. 0-0 We have reached a strategically complex position that is rich in possibilities for both players. Black can gain a pawn with lO ... exf4 with the idea - after 11. ~xf4 - to take on b2 with the queen (after ... 'iWb6 check). Otherwise, in the event of the prophylactic 11.~hl, he can try to defend the extra pawn on f4 with ll...tlJhS . Naturally, such greediness has its risks. Black can instead play the more solid 10.... ttJd7-c5 11. <;i;>g1-h1 e5xf4 12. ~c1xf4 327
Chess Openinn Essentials - Volum e 1
J4..txf6'''~f6 15~~~·'idJ "1s:i;2 'i .'jIjc7 17.l:tfd1 l:rfd8 1'8.tild2 tilxc2 19.1:rac1 tild4 20:Wg4 W1ie7 21.tbf3 '
White has some prospects of an initiative on the kingside, but Black's piece activity gives him sufficient counterplay. You should also note another possibility on the 8th m ove for Black:
8. ...
~d8-c7
This queen move prevents the white bishop from establishing itself on c4, The obj ective is a kingside fianchetto, but after 9, ~d3 g6 10,0-0 iLg7 11. ~el 0-0 !2 ,'l1!Vh4 b6 I Hiihl iLb7 14Jxe5 dxe5 15 ,~h6
b5 , 22.axb5 : axb5 23.tild5 h d5 ? :24~hd5 tilc2 .25.h4 tt)e3 26 :it'h5 ~ d:'xc1 27Jbc1 ', tilxd5 28.exd5 ) e4 'i : 29.~e1 1:ie830:'iY94 ..bb2. 31 J:te3 : :hS ' 32.tild2 .,'fia7 . 33.ttxe4 1i'a1+ 'j 34.'iith2 l:!.xe4 35.tilxe4 ~e5+3S.g3 '· ;11ia2+ ,37.lt.>h3 ifxd5 .38.'ii'f3 'iM8 \ '39.1ie3 i.d4 40.Wf4 W1ie541.'iff3 'i ;d5 42.lLld2 b4 43.tilb3 iLe3 " 0-1 ; ~:~
,
:,,>1.'
.::~ ,."
;, Alex~ev.Evgeny ':" < :"", ,", Arizmendi Martinez.Julen'. '
r
;<::",':,
;;,; BiellO'06 (4-) '
;1.~ ' c5 2.0f3dS .. 3.d4 e;ffi 4.~c3 , cxd4 5.ti::lxd4 a6 S.g3 e5 7.t?lb3lt.:lbd7l :8084 ' bS9.kg2 '\~b710.0-0 , j;.e7 ' ' 1tl:e1,l:tcS 12:t4d2 l:c513.tilf1:iWa8 ; ;14.YlgS hS ,15•.iXfsltJxf61S.tile3 gS ; :.17.'if'd3 0-0 1814 'exf4:19.gxf4 nh5 ' '20.l:tf1 , d5 21 ..8exd5 tilxd5 22.exd5 '; ;.tf6 23J:tad1 .ig7 24.fS 25.h3 ' :11g5 , 2S.lLle4 :'l:txfS f 27.l:xf5 gxf5 i ~ 2atilg3 , f4 29.tilfS "'d8 ' 30.lLl)ChS+ : ;<;;>g7 . 31.tilfS+ 'iith8 32.'ife2 , ~f6 ' 33.'f1fh5+ 'iitg8 34.tilh6+ , :, 1-0 )
;lkes
.~
'-, .
,," ~"..
":~-4.:
. ' .. ' .
.:" DomingUez.Lenier ";" ' :~ ::' De Firiniim.:l'~lck ,
. ";
,A
, '; ~,
~; ls~anbul 012000(13) ' ( ' : , . ('1.e4 Cs 2.tilf3 dS3.d4 cxd4 4.tilxd4i White has a dangerous kingside initiative, .' tilfS "5.tilc3 'as, S.f4 e5 7.lLlf3 tilod7 : ,8.a4 j,e7 9.~d3 ' 0-0 " 10.0-0 : exf4'" ., Beliavsky.Alexander ,N"'<"Y'" 't \';"~},i 11.lt.>h1 ,tbcS 12 ..bt4 ;~g4 13.fid2 i ~'" Tal.MikhaiL ';, " ", llcS ' 14.J:aeL l:e8 15.t2Jd4 jfd7, , Moscowch-URS 1973 (11) ' 1S.a5 ~h517.~f5 ~g618.~g5 ~d8 ' '1.e4 c5 2.tilf3 dS 3.d4 cxd44.tilxd4 19" bf6 ~xfS 20.tildS , .ad8 21.b4 '; tilfS 5.tilc3 as 6.a4 tLlcS 7~e2e5 ; ,tilxd3 22.cxd3 lle5 23~tilfe3 llc6 ~ 8.tilb3 .te7 9.0-0 0-0 10.f4 tbb4 24.tilc4 lle8 ' 25....f4 h6 , 2S.'ifg3 ' 11.h~ :te6 12.f5 ~d7,13.~95:~CS ", ' be42UbcbS llxbS'28.tiJxb6 .lhb6 ; 328
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf Variation r'"
.~
~.~
'.•
~.
,.... ....
"
...." ;-.. ,,"'.- .• 7. ~f3 g6 8.i.e3 k g 7 9.h3 e5 "".~.~'
'~""
_u ."",...
'.
-,~
' 29.l:lxe4 l:txe4 30.dxe4 k d4 3Ui'd3 :i.eS " 32.nc1 g6 33.~h3 "ire7 10.fxe5 dxeS " 11. ~h6 Jl.xh6 34."iYxh6 il..g7 3S.l:Lc8+' i.f8 36."ltf4 12.'ilVxf6 0·013~tbdS iiVaS+ ~ d5 37.n c7 'Ufe6 3S.eS i.d6 39.l:txb7 1.4 .b4 'ifdS , 1S.tbe7+ 1Wxe7, 16. ~xe7 exd4 17.i.c4 lLic6 :.\ixeS 40.'iff1 d4 41.b5'ifd5 42.bxa6 ,d3 43.l:tb1 ~g7 44.iVf3 "tWd4 45.l:tf1 ' 1S. ~ c5 i.e3 19.1111 tbd8 20. J::tf3 i fS 46.'ifb7+ wh6 47.a7 d2, 48.aS'W ':¥L e6 21.lh e3 dxe3 22. ~xe6 'dHIY 49.'iff8+ <;f.;> g5 50.'iYbe7+ Wg4 , tbxe623.iVxe3 a5 24.b5 l:tacS c'.,',; 1-0 . 25.0-0-0 U.cS 26.l:!.d5 b6 S1.h3+ ~. , " " "" ' 27.~ g3 , l:t c728. 'tW d6 ~ J::tfc8 ! .' lvanchuk,Vasily c:,;~.,: ". 29.J::td2 %l. b730.g4 tbc5 31.'iff6 ; Kasparov,Garry " ': . ., h6 32.e5 !:r eS 33.h4 <;t> h7 34.h5 1;, Am~terdam )994 (4) ' . , ' 9S 35. l::t d6 ne6 36.iYd8 'it'g7 :1.e4 <:5 2:tbf3 'd'6 ·3.d4 cxd4 ' 37.a3 a4 38.'.t>b2 l%be7 39:l:txb6 l~.tp)(d~ ~f6. S.:~C3 .a66.f4Ji'c7 .. '_ ," ".,:" 1-0
329
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
White can continue with the aggressive 9. SL.c1-e3
the subtle 9. or the solid
~g1-h1
9. a2-a4
This Classical Variation is becoming more and more popular. White simply wants to develop naturally before starting to play actively. The ensuing lines are of a positional nature, but this does not necessarily mean that they are easier to handle : as in its sister variation in the Scheveningen, tactical play usually starts after the opening phase. Yet again, Black has baSically two choices: A) to play e6, transposing to the Scheveningen (see the Scheveningen section for a detailed examination); B) to continue with the thematic 6 ... eS. We have already elaborated on the advantages and disadvantages of this pawn advance. e7-e5 6. 7. ltJd4-b3 S. 0-0 330
iLfS-e7 0-0
Each of these produces complicated positions that contain plenty of possibilities for both players. Generally, White seeks to exploit the weakness of the dS-square, and is careful to limit Black's counterplay. He then aims to create a kingside initiative with the pawn advance f2 -f4 . Sometimes, an alternative strategy is to occupy the dS-square with the knight, to recapture with the e4-pawn and then to make the mos t of his queenside pawn majority with the pawn advances b2-b4 and c2-c4-cS.
r" 'Kii!pov,AtlatolY''-' .
PolugaevSky,Lev Moscbwm 1974 (6)" . . 1.e4 c5 2.t~Jf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.t2lxd4: llJf6 ~.ltJe3 a6 6.~e2 e5 7.llJb3 A e7, S.0-0 1i.e6 9.f4 'We7 10.a4 ltJbd7. 11.<;t>h1 0-0 12.i,e3 exf4 13.11xf4' llJe514.a5 llJfd715JU1 .1).f6 16.llJd5 :1i.xd517.'ifxd51!Vxe2 1S.ltJd4 'tWxb2.19.11ab1 jfe3 20.llJf5 ..-e2 21.11be1
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 . .£ e2
ctbe5 2i:lbxdS tt:)ed3 23 ..b d3 ti;d3"'::''iYe5 30:ilVe2 tle7 31.l:ra4 ·'it;g7 ; 24.ltd1 .:· lLlb4 . 25.¥i'xb7 ' J:XabS '.,' 32J:tc4 ' h5 33.b4 g5 34.b5 g4 1-0 !2S:'iWa7 'iVeS , 27.Jif4 :taS2S.~f2 ; 35.'iWe3 h4 3S.bSl1ih7 37.b7 :'l ladS 29.~ g3 'i!¥ e3 30JU3 :'fjVe2 " '" ,, .', :31:Jadf1 ~d4 32.£i.hS tLleS 33.lLlfS Svidler.Peter " t~~2 34.~e1 · 'i¥b5 35.tt:ihS+ <;PhS Polgar,Judit 3S.lLlxf7+ n xf7 37.:txf7 ~fS 3S:iff2 '", Dos Hermanas i999 (9) '0' wgS 39JlxfS gxfS·40.'iWxfS 1-0 , 1.e4 c5 2.lLlf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 ii" ;.', ""c', " " , . lLlfS 5.lLle3 as S.~e2 e5 7.lLlb3 !lJ..e7 ~. Short,Nigel "", " .' 8.0-00-0 9..te3 ~eS 10.lLldS lLlbd7 Gelfand.Boris ~{' , " '" 1Ui'd3 .ltxdS 12.exd5 lLleS 13.'iVd2 ii' Amsterdam 1996 (2) lLlfe4 14.'i¥b4 a5 1S.1i'bS 'ite7 ,1 .e4 e5 2.tbf3 dS 3.d4 exd4.4.lLlxd4 , 1S,%:rtd1 bS 17:iVe4 fS 1S.~d3 'fHdS ' :,lLlfss.lLle3 as S:.\te2 eS 7.lLlb3 .¥i.e7 19.tLlxeS , lLlxeS 20.a3 l:teS 21.'iVb5 S.O-O .teS 9.14 Wie710.>ith1 0-0 11.fS e4 22 ..ltf1 ~fS 23.J:1ab1 ~e5 24.b4, axb4 2SJlxb4 lLld7 26J':e4 l:%xe4 i.te4 12.g4 hS 13.gS hxgS 14.hgS', :lLlbd7 1S.11g1 J:1fc8 1S.:bc4 'li'xc4 27.'iIk'xe4 'i¥e8 2S.:te1 lLlfS 29.h3 :17.'iYf3 <MS 18,83 bS 19.1Lld2 'i!i'eS lbd7 30:ii'e7 f4 31.!lJ..e1 e3 32.A b5 ' 20~1fh3 >ite8 21:fkhS+ .tfS 22 ..bf6 exf2+ 33.l1ixf2 f3 " 0-1 :'lLlxfS 23Jbg7, ;, a5 24.J:[g3b4 , " 2S.\WxfS bxe3 2S.bxe3 'ti'b7 27.l:tb1 Short,Nigel '" 'iVe7 2S:~'hS :tabS 29Jlbg1. ~d7 Polgar,Judit :)' 30.e4 J:Ib2 3Urc3 VWdS 32.'iVh7 ~eS Budapest 2003 (8) i33.J:[gS ~fS 34.~g2 ~d7 3S.tbf1 ' 1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 lLlfS S.lLle3 a6 SJt.e2 e5 7.lLlb3 ~e7 'il..e7 ,3S.lIg7 ItfS 37.tbe3 'iWh4 : 3S.'tifxh4 £!..xh4 39.eS dxc5 40.,axe5 , S.O-O 0-0 9.l1ih1 lLleS 10.i.e3 .\teS 84 41.'1I;>f3 1l.e7 42.11d5+~ l1ie7 '. 11.fVd2 d5 12.exd5 lLlxd5 13.tLlxd5 1-0 , .bd5 14.11fd1 iUb3 15.axb3 'i!Yxd2 43.li:txe5 .ba3 44.Jaa5 I" " 1S.Jaxd2 'uadS 17.Jaad1 ' :txd2 , Efimenko,Zahar 1SJbd2 n dS 19..i.d3 gS 20.e3 a5 Onischuk,Vladimir ". 21.f3 h6 22.g3 .tg5 23.f4 exf4 Poltava ch-UKR 2006 (1) , 24.gxf4 il..fS 25.Wg2 g5 2S.il..e4 :teS 1.e4 e5 2.lLlf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.lLlxd4 27Jle2 gxf4 2S..txf4 " Uxe2+ 29.~xe2 '1I;>g7 30.~g4 .tgS 31.i.e7 'tLlfS 5.lLle3 as S.il..e2 e5 7.lLlb3 1le7 '8,0-0 0-0 9.ll:e1 A eS 10..tf3 tLlbd7 Jl.dS 32.if.g3 I1igS 33.il..eS bS, :11.a4 Wie7 12.aS lUeS 13.i.e3 b5 34.l1if3 f5 3S ..ltd7lLle7 3S.iLh4 wf7 ;14.axb6 lLlxbS ~, 1S.l2Ja5UabS 37.il.f2 il..e7 38.h4 hS 39.we2 f4 40.Wf3 tLlg6 41.if.f5 lLle5+ 42.'1I;>e4 '1S.lLld5 lLlbxd5 1,7.exd5 .lit.d7 1S.lLleS ;il..xeS 19.dxeS e4 20.il..e2 , 'ifxeS " lLlg4 43 •.td4 lLle3 44.if.h3 lLlg4 '21.b aS Ite7 22.c4 d5 23 ..tbS '*YeS ·45.>itf5 lLle3+ 4S.'1I;>g5 lLle2 47.il..f2 '24.i.f4 i.dS 25.exd5 ~e7 2S ..ltxdSlLle3 48.>itxh5 w fS 49.~g4 .lit.dS ;'iiVxdS 27•.teS gS 2a.b3ndS 29.h3 .,,,' SO.~e1 i.f8 S1.b4 axb4 52.exb4
t,
331
Chess Open inn Essentials - Volume I
;':"0:0:0, O"O .:·9:~h1 .. ~b6 ~·10.f4";~·b7"
.tbdS····S3.bS·
'ib4 '· 54.'i~b4~" tH~b4 ~ 'SS;jLe2 )f;>fS S6.'ifo>h6 'it>f6 S7.~hS ,wfS SS.b3 , tbd5 S9.£Ld3+ ' ~eS , '60.wg4 tbf6+ 61.~f3 tbg8 82.hS ttbh6 ;63 ..tg6 tbgS 64.~c2 tbh6 · 6S.~d3tbg8 66.~g4 tbf6+67.wgS ~ f3 6S.h6 f2 69.Wg6 .tbdS 70.~c4 ~e4 71.<M7 tbe3 72.iL.'e2 tbfS 73.h7 ~e3 74..tf1lDg3 7S;.tg2 · 1-0 " ~." ,
11.~f3 tbbd7 12.tbdS 1:I.c8 13.c3 as 14.84 .ta6 1S..:re1 tbxdS 16.exdS fS ·· 17.it.e2 .be2 18.'iVxe2 it.f6 ,19.jLe3' tbc520:WbS ;' exf4 21 ,ilxf4 tbe4 ' 22.1:I.f1 , \\Vee 23.~d3 ' g5 24.~e3 ' iYhS · 2S.~d4 .:rceS . 26.wg1 . 94 ' 27.tbd2 ~xd4+ 28.'lWxd4 , g3 29.h3 ' 'i!¥e2 30.1:I.ae1 'iWxd2 ' '31.1:I.xe4 : '/Wxd4+ 32.1:I.xd4 . J:te2 33.t'l.f3 · f4 ':, Wirig.Antho~', .c.; " , 34..l%dXf4 " l:I.e1+ . ' 3S~ttf1 ttxf4' " Moradiabadi.Elshan '. 36.l:xe1 llxa4 37.~f{l:.f4+' 38.c.t;;g 1 : . Nancy 2001'(8) ;:" : .' , nf2Y~ 39Jle3 l1xb2 ' 40J:txg3+ , ~f7 ~1.e4 cS 2.tbf3 d6 3.d4 'cxd4 4.ttixd4 41 ..:rf3+wg6 42.c4 a4 43.c.t;;fft'l.c2 tbf6 S.tbc3 a6 6 ..lte2e5 7.tbb3 .ite 7,' 44.rle3 ~fS . .. " ,."', ,> 0-1,,~; ~'" ~. .".~, ~, .I-.~ _~: ,.r;.", ~.'~ • -~, 'i?'~1 . ."., ••, •• " • • ',_ .......
332
.....
,.
..,.
__ •• ,. ' •
.r . ' ,
•
..r",.f)G; """,,
\,,';.t... ' :".._ J
"
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 .~ e3 B) 6 . ... e7-e5 A response in pure Najdorf style. Now White can retreat the knight to a solid position on f3, with the plan to castle kingside and limit Black's queenside counterplay with a2-a4-aS, or White may choose the more aggressive and more frequently played 7. ttJd4-b3
This move was barely dealt with, if at all, in the old opening tomes. It underwent a sudden boom in the 1990s, and is now one of the most commonly played moves. As it was introduced by Murray Chandler, Nigel Short and John Nunn in the 1980s, it was to become known as the English Attack. White prepares for 'iWd2 and 0-0-0 followed by f2 -f3 (more rarely by f2 -f4) and g2-g4, with an initiative on the kingside. Black has fundamentally three continuations at his disposal: 6 ... e6, 6 ... eS and 6 ... tbg4. A) e7-e6 6. is the most popular, but leads into the realms of the Scheveningen Variation (see that section).
which leaves the passage open for the f-pawn, and he can prepare to castle queenside, which is followed by opposite-side pawn storms. The main line is 7. 1i.cS-e6 S. 'iWd1-d2 ttJbS-d7 9. f2-f3 .ItfS-e7 10. g2-g4 h7-h6 b7-b5 11. 0-0-0 12. h2-h4 ttJd7-b6 with a complicated position and chances for both sides.
C) ttJf6-g4 6 .... This move, which was not even mentioned in the old opening manuals, was perhaps the most frequ ent of all in the 1990s! Yet another clear indication that opening theory is far from exhausted and new contributions keep cropping up. Often a move is not part of opening theory Simply because it has not been played yet - or at least, not often enough! 333
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume
7. ~e3-gS S. JiLgS-h4 9. ~ h4-g3 10. i.,f1-e2
h7-h6 g7-gS ~fS-g7
h6-hS
Now we have a position that is difficult to evaluate. It is easy to see why people have such differing views about this line: Black has lost a tempo to move the knight to a fairly unstable pOSition on g4. On the other hand, White has moved his bishop four times to put it on g3, whereas his adversary's bishop has already taken control of the long dark-squared diagonal. Naturally, the price Black pays for his piece activity is the strategically doubtful advance of his g- and h-pawns, which denies the black king a quiet refuge on the kingside. However, this assessment is academic and should not be seen as immutable: it 334
is not rare in practice that Black, haVing taken control of the centre, will use his g- and h-pawns to apply pressure on White's castled king's position! The most common continuation is 11. i.,e2xg4 i.,cSxg4 JiLg4-d7 12. f2-f3 13. ~g3-f2 tZlbS-c6 14. 0-0 e7-e6 Black has an active pOSition and the bishop pair, while White has a better pawn structure. Given the effectiveness of 6 ... tbg4, players are increasingly resorting to 6. f2-f3!?
to prevent the knight move, and then they enter the 6.i.,e3 variation. Black can try to take advantage of the negative aspects of this idea with 6. ... 'iWdS-b6!? ~" ~:'~ " ' «'~-'-
'.
. . ",,. ,
." .... '~"..~.~~,.~.;
.. Kryvoruchko, Yury., .".' Kovchan,Alexander '. 'Alu~hta tt 2006(1) .:;
.t
':'x~:r";!:""~
' ,.; ..,"~:
"" ,; ;, .: . ' ':
~i
.~
~ 1.e4 cS2.li:lf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tbxd4 :
i:tbf6
S.tllc3,:a6 6..ii.e3 eS c 7.~de2.: ..te6 8.f4tbg4 9..ig1 g6 10.h3tbf6 : i 11.94 exf4 ' 12.tZlxf4 . tbc6 13Ji'd2 : 'tb'e5 "14.0-0-0 ~ ~f3 15.'tlt'~3 · tbxg1 ' p ~~eS .l1Lh6 .,17.nxd6. ttJd7 " 18~~e4 : tbf419.'itxf4 "itaS 20Jbe6+ ,~,,",. 1-0 ,
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 .~e3 .. ,
.'~.J;.
..·."1t ......·'t
~~.~"~.~v-.:j,~~;.
"!?j'.«I .•• ~ ...... '"
i>-~A""'-
:."•• '".)..."
"..,""'>-.
;. ....
"~"
~"'~'\
>f;l
.,.,
. Anand,Viswanathan ". \ ,; ;;;'::; ~e 7 14.lLl5a4 " nbS 15.lLlbS 0-0 .Kasp~?v,Garry ·~;:." ' , ' 1S/~(b1 ' ,: l:!b7 ', 17.lLlcd5 " lLlxd5 ~" Unaresi602 (10)'~' ','':: ,?, , 1S'lZJxd5 J:tb519•.tb6 ,'iVd7 20.a4 c1.e4 c5 2.lLlf3dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.li:ixd4 " J:txd5 21.exd5.tf5 22.g4 ii.gS 23.f4 'lilfS 5.l?\c3 a6 S.ii.e3e5 ?lilb3 il.eS ·: ,~ exf4. 24.l:the1 .tfS 25.95 ii.xg5 ;S.f3lLlbd7 9.g4b510.g5 b4 1Vt:Je2 : , 2S.~d4' 'ilYxa4 27.ttg1 .tfS 2S...txfS 1lLlh5 '~ 12;'iWd2 a5 ,. 13.lLlg3 " Q\xg3 ' gxf6 29.'it'd2 :1bS 30.1Wc3 tIb5 ? 14.hxg3 a4 ,15.lLlc1'~ a5 1S.lbd3 d5 ",:, 3Utd2 .f3, 32.h4 :1a5 33.'fia3 'ifxa3 ~ 17.exd51!yXd5" 1S.~92 1Yb5 19.ii.h3 '\34.bxa3 '*fS35.J:td4 : x83 3S.nxc4 i~xh'3 , 20.J::txh3 "* e7 21.n ti4 AS ,, ~e3 37.11f1 .te4 3S.c;i;>c1 f5 39.1:If2 ,22.0-0-0b3 23.a3 lieS 24.c3 ttJfS "' ~e7 ' 40.:ra4 ,j.xd5 41.wd2 l:te5 '; 25.11h2 t2ig6 2S.lLlb4 ttdS ~, 27.ltJd5 ,,' 42J~xa6 ::te4 43.c4l:!c5 "44.l%a4 "'it>f7 2S.WHd3 'ii'xd3 :29J:Ixd3 \ f4 ':, ~fS 45.~e3 e5 4S.l:td2 h5 47.<;1;;>f2' ~30.gxf4 exf4' 31lbxf4'lbxf4 32.nxdS \ l:I:ea 4S.we3 l:rc6.49.l:t~5+ It>eS : J:[xdS ' 33 ..txf4'" l:td3 34:trh3 "w gS ,' 50J%a4 ' ,l:!cS . 51.1%aS " l:txc4 ~ 35.it.d2 .tdS3S.llg3 :ii.e7, 37.l:!h3 . 52J%axdS+"', f5 39.w d1 i.e7 "1h: Y2 ",: 54.Wf2 " l1c1 "55.nhS tih1 5S.*93' ,i', ,'" " f4+ 57.wf2 :'::l:h2+58.we1l:!xM ," "Adams,Michael ?:,;, , ,:' 59j:th8 ' <,l;>f5 • SO.1::I.gS wfS 61:<;1;;>f2 ~ ' Hansen,Sune Berg'"",,· l:tg4S2.I:ie8 ;~f5 S3.1%f8 fS S4.tIhS ir:'Calv'ia 011004 (3)" .' :', ", :. 1:[g5 , S5.1:[i1a , J::l: g2+ ' 6S.'j,.,e1 'l1xd2 ~1.e4 c5 2.tbf3dS ~.d4 cxd4 ,4.t2ixd4; \, S7.W'xd2 <;i(g4 SS.l1hS ~g3 69.);[gS+, ttJfS 5.lLlc3 as S..te3 e5 7.ttJb3 $.eS , ',*,f2 70J%hS h4 71 .I:!xh4 wg3 ' . 0-1 : :S.f3 lLlbd7"9.'iVd2 ;b510.0;;0-0 l:teS'" .'.''''' " h 1.Wb1 j.e7, 12.g4ttJbS ,13.g5lLlh5 '," "','., ", ', " ;" ';14.'iWf2 q)c4 '15..bC4 ~xc4 1s.l:n'91 ~':; Karj;iki~,Sergey:" ' ''',, i'il'bS 17.th d5 ,.tdS 1S.lLld2 ItcS , , , "' Anand,Viswanathan ': 19:ttJf1 A xd5 '''20.nxd5 ,O-021.tbg3 ;:: ,.. ' 'Wijka;;1,Zee 2006 (1) :lilX93 22.hxg3 ,; fS ' 23.gxfS ~xfS ' 1.e4 c5 2~lLlf3 dE; 3.d4 cxd4 4.lLlxd4 ;24.'lWd2 tIcS 25.l:td1 Ji..e7 26.f4 n fcS ;' ttifS 5.lLlc3 as S.iLe3 e5 7.ttJb3 ~eS ~ 27.fxe5 dxe5' 2S.J:l:d7 ,iifS 29.\lfd5+ " S.f3 .te7 9:tii'd2 0-0 10.0-0-0 tbbd7 ;WhS 30..lta7 , ~a8 ~ 31:ilt'xe5 11xcL 11.g4 b5 ' 12.95 b4 13.lLle2ttJe8 :,32.~d~ , 1:[C1!: ,33Jbc1 l:txcH ' 14.f4 a515.f5 a4 16.ttJbd4 exd4 : 34.~xc1 ~cS+ ' 1-0 17.lLlxd4 b3 1S.'it>b1bxc2+ 19.1Llxc2 i"',"';' , " ',:' .i.b3 ; 20.axb3 axb3 ,21.ttJa3 lLle5 ; , Quezada,Yuniesky ', ,:/ 22;h4 ' lia5 23.'iVc3?! ' 'iraS 24.il.g2' ' lLlc?'!! 25.t\f~C7 l:tcS 2S.'lbe7 lilc4! . Karjakin,Sergey , "t CaIviaol2004 (11) ' ',' 27.g6 hxgS 2S.fxgS'lLlxa3+ 29.bxa3 ;1.e4c5 V bf3 d6 3.d4 cxd44.ttJxd4 ":' 1:Ixa3 30.gxf7+ Wh7 31.fSlLl+ J:!xf8 ,lLlfS 5.lLlc3 as' S.A e3 e5 7.lLlb3 ~eS ,, 32:ifxfS ' J:laH 33.<;t>b2 1:[a2+' :S.f3 lLlbd79.Wd2 b5 10.0-0-0 lLlbS ' ;'34.<;t>c3 · 1i'a5+ 35.'it>d3 ,'iYb5+ ' 11.'iYf2 .lLlc4 ..1 2.~xc4,bxc4 J 3.t21c5 :.::': 3S.~d4 11a4+ 37.'it>c3 'iVc4+ ," O-{
t) ,
335
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
Ivanchuk,v~ily
,,
, , Topalov,Veselin
c"'
' Morelia/Linares 2007 (2)
18•.!ldS tLle6 19.e3 J:Iad8 20.l:tfe1' 'iYg6 21.a4 )f,;>h7 22 ..be6 bxe6. 23JWxa6 dS ,24.aS fS 25.i.e5 l:ta8 26.'ifb6 ttf7, 27.b4 f4 28.f3 'h5 29.'iff2 A hS '" 30.il..d4 g4 , 31.hxg4 hxg4 , 32.fxg4 , f3 33.gxf3 -trafS , 34.~g2 l:txf335.'iVxf3l:txf3 3S ...t>xf3 ' " 'iVe2 ' ·37.aS .~ 'it'h2 38.~e5 'tIVa2 ', 39.1%a1 'iYe240.a7 iVd3+41.""f21-0 , . . , . ' " '.
1.e4 e5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 tLlfS 5.tDe3 as S:~e3 e5 7.tDf3 il..e7 S.~c4 0-0 9.0-0 il..e6 10.heS fxe6 11.tba4tLlg412.'iYd3 tLlxe313.'Wxe3 b5 14.tDb6 J:ta71S.tDd5 Ub71S.'fld2 tLle6 17.:t.ad1 , lld7 18:1Vc3 ctLlbS 19.ttJxe7+ 1!Vxe7 20.J:l:d3 hS 2UI:td1 ..rUd8 22.h4 wh7 23.l:t1 d2 fits ' ,. Kasimdzhanov,Rustam . x, ,24.1iVb3 'ife8 . 25.a4 'i!tg6 2S.axbS , Anand,Viswanathin -, axbS 27..lle3 tDa6 ' 2S.1!VxbS tLle5 '" S~' i.,uiS Wch·FIDE 2005 (t) i 29.1!Vc4 J:ta7 30.J::.e1 iVeS 31.b4 tDa4 .. 1.e4 eS 2.ttJf3 d63.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 32.'iYb3 ttJb6 33.J:ted1.llad7 34.'ifd3 ·· tDf6 5.tDc3 a6 6.il..e3 tDg4 7.~gS tis 'lIe8 35.e3 J:[a73S.'iVe3l:I.a6 37....e2 ··· 8.i.h4 9S 9.~93 ' ~91 10.h3 ttJe5 ' tDC4 3S.:a2 l:tae6 39.J:ta7 .!l6e7 ' 11.tLlf5 i!..xfS 12.exfS .tDbe613.tLld5 40.J:tda1±'iWf7??41.1it'xc4! , 1-0 ," eS1~.fxe6 fxe6 1S~tiJe3 0-0 16.ke2 V e7 17.0-0 J:tadS 1S.il..hS ""h8 Ivanchuk,Vasily ' 19.1:te1 dS 20.a4tDe4 21.tbxc4 dxc4 Shirov,Alexey 22.'ilVg41!Vb4 23.'i!txe6 J:td2 Wijk aan Zee'2001 (11) 24.J:tad1 tild4 2S.ii'e4tDfS2S .~eS 1.e4 cS 2.tDf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.elxd4 ' ',. .llxf2 27..tf3 rId2 ' 28..bg7+ ~x'97. ,tDfS S.tbe3 as 6.~e3 tDg4 7..tg5 tis 29.\\feS+' 11fS ' 30.a5tbh4 31.\'i'e7+: S.i..h4 g5 9..!lg3 A g7 10:h3 }t:lf6 ", J:[f7 32:iYeS+ lU633.il..hS tbg6 11 ..!le4 'iYb6 12.0-0 tbxe4 13.tbxe4 " 34;:bg6 ,', rIxd1 3S.J:txd1~xg6 'iYxd4 14.tbxd6+, exd6 15.'iYe2+ , 36.ife4+ ·, ~97" 37..l:1d7+ 'it;>g8 ii.e616 ...be6 0-0 17.J:lad1 lIff6 "=0'_.... 38:~fh7+ ,, , .,.1-0' , ..; _ ... """" ," 0.......' ,.. .. ,. , •
336
•
,",
. >~ ••
,~
~",
~.
~
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6.~ n5
Sicilian Defence Najdorf 6.~g5 1.e4 c5 2,.'d3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.t; Jxd4 !; .f6 5 . ~ ,c3 a6 6 ...i..g5
,~
countering an unprepared adversary. In the first years of the new millennium there has been a return of interest at the higher levels. This is perhaps because the quantity of theory for the so-called minor variations has now also reached disturbing proportions. After 6. ... e7-e6 White almost always continues with 7. f2-f4
... :
The last of the alternatives is the old main line 6.~g5. Though it is not so commonly played now, its appeal remains unaltered. The move was very popular from the 1950s until the 1980s - or more precisely, the line that continues with 7.f4 was by far the most common variation. With the advent of a burgeoning amount of theory, creative players started to look for alternatives in unexplored areas, as they had become tired of the fact that memory was becoming as important a factor as understanding. For this reason, the move 6 .~g5 was to become a rarity in the 1990s, at least at the higher levels. However, lower-level players have always continued to show a marked preference for this historically important and fascinating variation. Their choice is probably inspired by the hope of a qUick checkmate or of en-
with the idea of e4-e5. 7.'iWf3, which was popular in the early days of the variation, is now very rare. After 7 .f4 there is a major crossroads: Black has a healthy choice from six major continuations which are all perfectly playable, plus two minor lines (7 .. .~d7 and 7 ... h6). All of these have a lot of related theory and they are strategically very divergent as well; small wonder that 6 .~g5 is a daunting prospect for the lazy player! A) 7.... ttJb8-c6 The most recent of the alternatives is now part of established theory. A move that applies pressure to the centre would appear to be logical. since the moves ~g5 and £2-f4 have isolated the bishop on the kingside. with a resulting weakness of the dark squares in the centre and on the queenside. The question is if the pawn advance e4-e5, which
337
Ches s Open inn Essential s - Volume 1 Black does not appear to be worried about, is good or bad for White. White has two continuations, both of which produce unclear positions: A1)
S. e4-e5 9. jLg5-h4 Or 9 .. .tLlxd4!? 10. f4xg5 11. ttJc3xd5 12.e5xd6 13. ~d1-e2+
h7-h6 g7-g5 ttJf6-d5 e6xd5 jLfSxd6
.! " .t ~~ , .I. ' .I. .I. ~.t ;, .I.
tD
,
'Ii'
i.
and the black king's precarious position seems to be compensated for by the weaknesses on White's queenside. B) ttJbS-d7 7.... Another way to prevent e4-e5, and also enabling the ... b7 -b5 push. When Black develops the bishop to e7, you transpose to the main line with 7 ... ~e 7, but here Black's idea is to immediately activate his pieces on the queenside. S. ~d1-f3 ~dS-c7 9. 0-0-0 b7-b5
'.I. f'::, ~
f'::, f'::,
~~
1I
with complicated play. A2)
S. ttJd4xc6 9. e4-e5 10. ~g5-h4 11. f4xg5 12. ttJc3-e4 Or 12.tLlxd5. 12 ....
b7xc6 h7-h6 g7-g5 ttJf6-d5
~dS-b6
Now White has three continuations: 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.
~f1xb5
a6xb5
ttJd4xb5 e4-e5 e5xf6
~c7-bS
~ g5-h61
~fSxh6
ttJb5xd6+
WeS-e7
!. 'r;' ,-
ttJ
f'::,/::,f'::, . .':;,~
338
RaS-a5! g7xf6
~ I"f ', \3' ~
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 .~ gS With two pawns for the piece and the Black king out in the open. White would appear to have abundant compensation: in reality practice has taught us that it is a struggle for White to maintain equality. 82) 10. e4-e5 Aiming to sacrifice two pieces! 10.... ~c8-b7 11. ~f3-h3 dSxe5 12. lLld4xeS f7xeS 13. 'tiVh3xeS+ .l1l.f8-e7 14. ..Itf1xb5 Alternatives like 14.lLlxb5 and 14 ..l1l.xf6 often tend to end in a draw as well. 14.... aSxb5 15. lLlc3xb5 ~c7-cS 1S. lLlb5-dS+ we8-d8 17. f4xe5 wd8-c7!
with a chaotic posmon whose extreme consequences have yet to be fully examined. However. the unwritten law of chess harmony teaches us that it is rare that such violent methods can refute variations with a solid positional foundation. A draw is the most likely result. 83)
10. ~f1-d3
White contents himself with increasing the pressure. and as such this is the most dangerous line. 10.... ~c8-b7 11. J:lh1-e1 Now Black can transpose with 11 ...Ji e7 to the main line Najdorf (7 .. .~e7). or otherwise maintain a position of a more individual nature with 11 ... 0-0-0. or with 11 .... 'tWc7-bS After this last move. the sacrifice 12. lLlc3-d5!?
is not for ced. but it is interesting. If Black is wise. he will not accept the piece (after 12 ...exd5, 13.lLlc6!! is very strong), instead h e should sacrifice his queen : 12 ... ~xd4! 13 . .l1l.xf6 gxf6 14 .~ xb5 'if c5 15. b4! ~xb5 16.lLlc7+ c;J;;e7 17.lLlxb5 axb5. with unclear play. 339
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume C)
7....
~da-c7
A logical move : before playing ...b7-b5, Black protects himself against the e4-e5 push without worrying about doubled pawns on the f-file . a. 'lWd1-f3 b7-b5 White doesn't seem to gain an advantage with either the solid 9 . ~xf6 gxf6 or the aggressive 9.0-0-0 b4 10.e5 ~b7 11.tLlcb5!? axb5 12.~xb5+ tLlbd7! 13 .1Wh3 b3!.
edly played the variation from 1959 until the 1990s, and it has never been refuted. Like the Dragon Variation it always rises from the ashes. Despite all this, it has never been as popular as the other variations. This is perhaps because of the excessive risks involved if you have not memorized a truly large number oflines.
After the thematic a. e4-e5 d6xe5 9. f4xe5 Black does not lose a piece on account of 9 .... ~da-c7
It is surprising that this variation is not
played more often.
Polugaevsky Variation D) 7.... b7-b5 This famous variation is named after its creator, the Russian grandmaster Lev Polugaevsky (1934- 1995). He devot-
340
and now we have reached a major crossroads: White can defend e5 to maintain his space advantage, but he will be left with a weak e5-pawn. He can also take on f6 conceding a central
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 .~ 95 pawn and his dark-squared bishop, and put his faith in the lead in development that he gains. ItJf6-d7 10. 'iWd1-e2 11. 0-0-0 ~cS-b7 11 .. .tLlc6 is also interesting. 12. "ii\¥e2-g4
01)
Now Black can play either the cautious 12 ... 'ii:Vb6 to parry the threat of 13.ttJxe6, or the bold 12 .. .~xe5. White can meet the latter with the optimistic 13 .~xb5; however, it is b etter to choose 13 .~e2, with the idea of ~f3, which keeps Black under long-term pressure. Years of practical play have shown that White is unable to overcome the surprising resilience of Black's positio ns in both these lines. 10. e5xf6 ~ c7-e5+ 11. ~f1-e2 'fWe5xg5 After 12 .0-0 or the refined 12.llVd3, nobody has yet found a way to squeeze any advantage out of White's lead in development. even if it is evident that Black is walking on a tightrope.
02)
Poisoned Pawn Variation E)
7....
"ti¥dS-b6
This is the famous Poisoned Pawn Variation: since its inception, it has always been the subj ect of co ntroversy. Its colourful name would suggest a scant regard for the validity of the variation, but the experience gained from years of practical play is that the b2-pawn often proves to be a tasty morsel for Black, and not a small pellet of poisonous bait! The Poisoned Pawn Variation first appeared in tournament play in the 1950s and it was at first underestimated, in part due to the brilliant victories with the white pieces obtained by Keres and Tal. However, there is nothing as persuasive as victory, and Fischer's successes in the 1960s with the black pieces qUickly changed the opinion of opening scholars and players alike. This is made evident by the fact that 7.. .~b6 was Kasparov's favourite move. However, it rarely anyone felt brave enough to take him on with this line. In a certain sense. 7.. "~b6 is perhaps Black's most logical move : with the darksquared bishop no longer controlling b2 and e3. White's queenside is put under immediate pressure. S. 'ilVd1-d2 The timid 8.ttJb3 is playable, but brings no advantage. S. ... "tWb6xb2 341
Chess Opening Ess entials - Volume 1
White has two continuations: E1)
9. ttJd4-b3
The most solid. It seems unnatural to take the ttJd4 away from the centre, but the threat of a2-a3 and l::ta2 forces Black to act. 9 .... 'li'b2-a3 9 ... ttJc6 is also playable as after 10.a3 ttJaS 11.l::ta2, 11.. .ttJxb3 saves the queen. 10. ..\1l.g5xf6 g7xf6 11. ~f1-e2 h7-h5 12.0-0 and White's compensation is difficult to evaluate. E2) 9. J:la1-b1 The most natural, and it is considered to be the strongest, even if statistically the results are in Black's favour! 9. ... 'li'b2-a3
342
The following attempts fail to give White an advantage: 10.eS, 10 ..txf6 and 10. ~e 2. The same goes for 10. f4-f5 ttJb8-c6 11. f5xe6 f7xe6 12. ttJd4xc6 b7xc6
Here the positions become tactically highly complex after either the solid 13. ~e2,or
13. e4-e5!? d6xe5 13 .. .ttJdS is another line. 14. ~g5xf6 g7xf6 15. ttJc3-e4 Some continuations have been deeply studied until the endgame stage: with correct play Black maintains at least equality. However, it obvious that we are dealing with very risky lines that do not offer many opportunities for personal interpretation.
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 . ~ g5 F)
7....
~f8-e7
The so-called Main Line. Black delays counterplay on the queens ide and develops naturally on the kingside. White continues with 8. ~d1-f3 to prepare queenside castling. An attentive student might ask why the queen is moved to f3 and not to d2. as is the case in the Richter-Rauzer. This is because on f3 the queen is more usefully placed than on d2: it is easier to transfer it to g3 or to h3 and the advance e4-e5 will gain force when Black plays ... b7-b5. Above all. the move 8 .~d2 would lead to a tactical problem here after 8 ... h6! and if9 .~h4 tLlxe4!. Back to 8.'i!Vf3. At this point we are at an important crossroads: 8 ... h6 or 8 .. :tlYc7. F1)
8 ....
h7-h6
The Gothenburg Variation, whose ambitious idea is 9. ~ g5-h4 g7-g5!? To break up the white pawn formation on the kingside. This variation made its simultaneous (!) debut in the 1955 interzonal tournament in Gothenburg. Remarkably, three Argentinean players, Pilnik, Panno and Najdorf, played it at the same time against three Soviet champions: Spassky, Geller and Keres, respectively. The result: three victories for White! The implied verdict has not changed with time: against correct play Black has an uphill battle maintaining equality after 10. f4xg5 tLlf6-d7 11. tLld4xe6! II .~h5 also makes a lot of sense. 11. ... f7xe6 12. ~f3-h5+ It>e8-f8 13. ~f1-b5!!
.!.iil.t.'iV
, <.
"
.,
~.t.
"
' !li.
~
0i
~~ ~ ~
•, J:
~'i¥
!li. ~ ~
W ,,' , ld
The move played by Geller in the previously mentioned stem game, and the one that is still considered to be the best. Fischer came up with the best defence three years later 13 ... ~h7! (GligoricFischer, Portoroz 1958). After 14.0-0+ Wg8 15.g6 J:(g7 16 .J::r.f7 ~ xh4 343
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
17 . ~xh6, according to the most recent analysis the white attack remains strong and promising. The idea of playing ... h6 and, on the retreat of the bishop to h4, to continue with .. . g5 to give the white f4-pawn a kick, and place the d7 -knight on the e5 outpost is a characteristic strategic manoeuvre. We have already seen this manoeuvre in the Richter-Rauzer, and we will see it again in Variation F21 with 1 0 ..ilLd3 see below. F2) S. ~dS-c7 The most frequent response. It prevents 9 ..ilLc4, or rather this is the explanation given in the chess opening bibles. 9. 0-0-0 ttJbS-d7
idea stems from the highly risky GothenburgVariation) 11..ilLh4g5!?
and the interesting idea of making a positional pawn sacrifice becomes apparent: 12.fxg5 ttJe5 13 .'il!Ve2 ttJfg4 . Back to 1 0 .. .b5. Play continues with 11 ..!:!:he 1 iLb7. Now White can continue with Velimirovic's sacrifice 12.tt:id5!?, which is interesting but probably unsound: (please go to the appendix to look at the brilliant victory by Velimirovic when he first uncorked his sacrifice). However, White is not forced to play this sacrifice and he can play the quieter 12 . ~g3
We fmd ourselves confronted with another big dilemma for White: 10 ..ilLd3 or 10.g4? F21) 1O. ~f1-d3 Moving the last undeveloped piece to a natural square and inaugurating a strategy of central play. 10. ... b7-bS Consistent, but there exists a playable alternative that is safer: 10 ...h6 (an example of the irony of chess - this safe
344
and then after 12 ...b4!? (12 ... 0-0-0 had its trial by fire in the firs t Spassky-Fischer match, in Reykjavik 1972), the sacrifice on d5 becomes even more dangerous. However, it
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6.ii.g5 should not worry Black too much; provided that he is well prepared!
F22) 10. g2-g4 A standard attacking move in the Sicilian.
In this situation, there are two problems: the bishop on gS obstructs g4-gS and Black can still castle queenside, thwarting, at least pardy, White's pawn storm. Therefore White is required to take energetic measures before Black can quietly complete his development. 10. ... b7-b5 11. ~g5xf6 To speed up the initiative. 11. ... lbd7xf6 Fischer's move 11 ... gxf6!? is hardly ever played now, but it is not as bad as it might seem. 12. g4-g5 lbf6-d7 13. f4-f5! 13.a3 seems slow for the reasons explained above. 13. ... ~e7xg5+ To accept the pawn seems best; after 13 .. .ltJcS 14.f6 gxf6 IS.gxf6 ~f8 16 .~ gl! ii.d7 17.1:!g7!!, practical play has demonstrated that White has a highly dangerous initiative.
lbd7-e5 14. ~ c1-b1 15. ~f3-h5 Attacking e6 and gS. Wic7-e7 15.... Or IS ... ~d8. 16. lbd4xe6 ~c8xe6 g7-g6 17. f5xe6 18. e6xf7+ White gets back the pawn with a position which is difficult to evaluate: Black's king is a little exposed, the d6-pawn is weak, and the dS-square is in White's hands .. . yet this is not enough to yield a de cisive advantage! The powerful knight on eS and his control of the dark-square complex gives Black sufficient counterplay.
~,
Timman,Jcin"'" Gelfand,Boris
,~.
< Wijk aan Zee 2002 (8) , ::1.e4 c5 2.lbf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.lbxd4 'lbf6 5.lbc3 a6 6~~g5 e6 7.f4 lbbd7 8.,*,f3 Wic7 9.0-0-0 b5 10..I1lxb5 'axb5 11.tb dxb5 'ilYb8 12.e5 l::ra5 14.ith6 itxh6 i13.exf6 gxfS ;15.lbxd6+ we7 1S.~b1 . J:td8 J 7.l:!.he1 ltJb6 18.lbcb5 dhb5 .19.lbxb5 ttxd1+?! [19 ... lbc4] :20.Uxd1 bf4 21.g3 .te5 22.fVa3+ ' ~e8 23.lbd6+ ..txd6 24.'lWxd6 'i!l'xd6 25.J:Ixd6 lbd5 26.c4 ~e7 34S
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume J
" 27.:cS):b74i8:~;d5iA~~629.d~~'ft 'j1'~ i "wdS 30'.941 ' :i, "
'
"
"0',.,
1-0
,
:20.ii~d l ,':;8
;.
.• c"
"..".
"2riD" 'i~3~:
' 'ii'e2 ' 23,~Cl " 'ife3+";]
17.~xg7+ :;':.,.<j;xe7
~
':.;.:i'< ' [JS ...'J;>f8 :' ) 9,ti:lf5]
, Chiburdanidze,Maia ,:::. ~ Dvoiris,Semen ' ) ,~,', Tallinn 1980 '
e;"
iUt'bJ
18.'ir'g5+ ::. f6'
19.exfS+ wdS
.'. 20.f7 + <;i;;>c 7 21.'¥Hf4-1; '"
"
-;,
"
!, 1-0,
'i,
r '\',. ")
1.e4 c5 2.lbf3 dS 3,d4 ;Cxd44.tDxd4 Tal,Mikhail';: '" ' li:lfS 5.li:lc3 as S.~g5eS 7.f4 ,li:lbd7 ' Po~ugaevsky,Lev,\' , ,,:,-: :} ,S.'i!i'f3 'lifc7 9.0-0-0 b5 10.iJ.d3 £ b7 A1ma-Ata ill i980 (2) '~. , , .11.l:the1 iYbS 12.li:ld51? exdS? 1;e.. ,c 5 2.013 dS3.d4 cxd4 4.tt)xd4. '[l2...'iWxd4!]' ., 13.li:lc611 .ltxcs tDfS 5.li:lc3 a6 S.£ g5 eS 7.14 bS S.eS 14.exdS+, ~e7 1S.dxcS , li:lcS , dxeS 9.fxe5 'ftc7 :10..bbS+ axbS ,1S.bfS gxfS 17..\1t,f5 ~c7 1S.b4 . 11.exfS ' 'iiYeS+ 12.~e2 ;' 'tWxgS li:leS 19.'tWh5 li:lg7 20.£ d7+ ~fS , 13.li:ldxb5 lIaS' c 14.fxgi " .bg7 21.'lWh6 dS 22.trxe7 Wxe7 23J:te1+ ,. 15.li:le4 'tYe5 1S.li:lbdS+ ~e7 17.0-0 ..ttfS " 24.'ifxfS ~9S 25.1%e7 1:I.f8fS 1S.1%ad1 I:!.d519.'iYc4 n xd1 2S~eS 'Y!Wxe7 27.Wixe7 fxe6 2S.c7 20.J:lxd1 fxe4 21.lt'lxcS+ ~f7 •hS 29.'Y!WxfS+ ,.yxfS 30.c8'i!i+ wf7 22.lbdS+ wgS 23.li:lxe4 ,4JaS 24.g7 Rashkovsky,Nukhim 35.li:lg4 lbc4 '3S:1%xeS nbS 37.1:I.c6 Moscow,ch-URS 1973(8) li:lxbS 3S.l:!c7+ 'wgS . 39.c4 li:la4 1.e4 c5 2.li:lf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.li:lxd4 40.~f2 J:1b2+ 41.wf3 1%xa2 42.We4 :li:lfS 5.tDc3 as S..li.g5 eS 7.f4 ¥fic7 ' S~d3 [S,1Iif3] 'S..•li:lbd7 9....e2 b5?1 tre2+ 43:J.-f5 ~e7 44.li:lf6+ .bfS' 4S.wXfSli:lbS 4S.g4 lbg2 47..t>g5 [9 .;, iJ.e7] 10.0-0-0 ..tb7 (I D.. M .:td2 4S.cSli:ld7 49.cS lldS+ 50.~hS' 11.li:ld5! exd512.exd5+ Yle7 13,flhel l:tdS+ 51.Wg5 ttle5 52.11cS+ wg7 "li:lbS 14.h f6 ' gxf6 15 .~f5! J:{a7 , 16,.RxcS 'iYxcs 17.g4 ",dS J 8.li:lf5 l:teS 53.llc7+ 'li:lf7+ 54.wf5 hS '55.>t>e4 wfS SS.I:!.cS'n d1 57Ji fS I:tdS SS.J:1cS: J9. ~d3 'iVd7 2D,J:l.e3±] 11.l:!:he1 §Le7 li:lgS+ 59.~e3 We7 . SO:>t>f4 li:lf7 [l1...D-D-D!?) 12.eSI dxe5 13'.txeS li:ldS 14.:.be7?1 [14,li:lxe6! fxe6 SV;f;/g3 tld3+ S2.~g2 ltc3 S3.J:1c7+, wfS S4.1:rcS li:leS SS.c7 li:lf7 SS.J:19S (14 ....L:g5+ . 15.li:lxg5 li:lxc3 16.bxc3 I:txc7 67.Wg3 l1c1 SSJ:LaS ~e5 'ftxc3 17.~g4 'iYa3+ lS.Wd2 'iiaH S9.I:tfS+Wg770Jlf5 l::\c3+ 0-1 19,"'e2 Keres) 15.fih5+ WdS 16.tDxd5 · hd5 17,jue7+ ,cJ;;xe7 .; lS.'t!Yg5+ <;l;;>eS 19.1t'xg7] ,14...li:lxc3 Beliavsky,Alexander 15.1j'g4 ". li:lxd1 [l5...~xe7? Polugaevsky,Lev 16.li:lxe6!+-] 1S.li:lxeS ' 'iVc6? MoscowSpartakiad1979 [16 ...fxe6! 17 .~d6 'ilfb6 lS.'ifxe6+! 1.e4 c5 2.li:lf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4. (18,~g5?! ; li:lf6!) lS .. ,<;l;;>dS 19.£f5 .c-. 4.li:lxd4 .,li:lfS . S.li:lc3 as ,S ..agS ,e6 i,
346
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6 .jLg5 ;
' • ...·~~";·(t,
",':'o'\O~
,,~.-lI
""
... '
~~,: ~."-_'
,,,.
."'~~.~~~".:~'
"->'WO' ",
'.t ".,-'.... ;.."' • ...,,~ . .;f. .... -~....
-.',
,.;...,
,...... .
,, ' ( . . . . .
., .
' 7.14 b5 S.e5 dxe5 . 9.fxe5 Wic7 " 12...ltJxe4 13.ltJxe4 $i..xh4 14.f51 p O.exfS ",. 1We5+' 11 ;~e2 ;' fVx95 ~. exf5 15.*,b5+ axb5 " (15...'iPe7 ~12.0-0 .'ffe5 13.ltJf3 ~c5~14.~h1 16.Wif4gS. 17 .11ie3! i..e6 (17 ...fxe4 :WixfS ' 15.ltJe4 'ife7 ~· 1S.ttSfg5 0-0 . 18.'iWxe4+' .Jte6 19 ..Jte4±; 17 ... axbS ;1 V t:;ixf7 " Ibf7 1S.l:1xf7·, ,'iPxf7..:: 18.ltJxd6t! · Wxd6 (18 ... ~e 6' ;19..Jth5+ ,;:g7 40.ltJe2 ~ e7 41.'it>e1 h542 ...t>dfh4 , [27.\.lilt6+] 2S.ltJa5 bS [28 ... l:td7!?] 43.b3 lile5 44J:td4<MS , 45.l:txe4 ' 29.ltJc4 ltJd5 30lu edS ~e5 ;ltJxM 4S;~e2'iPe5 47,wd3 ltJf2+ "., (30 .,. <j.og6!?] 31.ltJb7 : J : teS : 4S.~e3ltJd1+ 49.~d2lilf2 50.lild4 : [3 L .tUe3'':'''"t Tal] 32.e4tUe3 33.J:tf3 'w f4 51.lileS+. 'iPg3 52;w e3 ltJd1+ It::lxe4 34.gxf4 g4 35.l:!.d3 h5 3S.h3 53.wd4 ~xg2 54.e4 bxc4 55.bxe4 ·.. lua5 37.lil7dS $i..xdS 3S.ltJxdS J:tc1 + \t;xh3 56.e5tUb2 57.eS ' ~' tUa4 39.<;t;g2 lilc4 AO.ltJeS+ <j.ogS 41.h4! ; 5S.ltJf4+ <;i;> g3 59.g1 1/2- 1/2 ' S7.lfxa4 'ifaH SS.<j.oe5(78) 1-0 ..
+:
!'
_
",
.
-;~.
.~
Spassky.Boris Fischer.Robert
;" Spassky.Boris :c' Fischer.Robert ReykjavIk Wch m 1972 (7)
..
,1.e4 e5 2.lilf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.lt::lxd4 tUfS 5.lile3 as S.~g5eS 7.f4 Wb6 c.S.'ilfd2 '(ifxb2 · 9.€ib3 'tWa3 [9 ... lilc6 'l O.,Lf6 : (lO.a3 ltJaS!) 10 ... gxf6 11.ltJa4 'ifa3 12.ltJb6 n b8 13 .ltJc4 ;'fja4 White has good.compensation for ; the pawn; 9... lilbd7 ~s possible in view 'of lO.a3?! ~cS] 10..l1i.d3 Ae7 11.0-0 ' hS , 12.~h4 ·[12 .~xf6 .itxf6 n.eS (with chances for both Sides)' 13 ... dxeS ,( 13 ... .l1I.e7. · ":, 14. ~fe1 ! ) ",,,.," 14.ltJe4]
ReykjavikWchm 1972 (11) 1.e4 e5 2.tUf3 dS 3.d4 exd4 4.lilxd4 ltJfS 5.ltJe3 as S.~g5eS 7.14 'i'bS S.1i'd2 'ifxb2 9.tUb3 'ik'a3 10.~xfS gxf6 11.~e2 h5 12.0-0 lileS 13.w h1 .ltd7 14.ltJb1 'lYb4 15.fVe3 d5? [15...ttJe7!] 1S.exd5ltJe717.c4 lilf5 1S.'tWd31 h4? [18 ... 1:I.c8] 19.~g4ltJdS 20.ltJ1d2 f5? 21.a3 'ifbS 22.e5 ifb5 23.'i1fc3 fxg4 24.a4+- h3 25.axb5 hxg2+ 2S.<j.oxg2 ' l:Ih3 27:VWfS lilf5 2S.eS ~eS 29.dxeS fxeS 30.:fe1 ", .lte73U1xeS . ~. 1-0 '.'
347
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 Qi jin~~cm
"':"' .iuth~,Th~~s :'" ''';,''';.' l~"""
:, Karpov,Anatoly
Kasimdzhcmov,Rustam
~
Hann~er J 983 (13 )
.·Essen "2002 (3) '
";" ';;
"I
.... .
1.e4 cS 2.lbf3 d6 3.d4 c:xd4 4.tbxd4 ; 1.e4 cS 2.tbf3 d6 3.Cf4 cxd4 4.tbxd4 tbfS S.tbc3 a6 6.~gS eS 1.14 lWb6 ' ,CZlf6 S.tbc3 as" S.~gS eS 7.14 ~bS S.'tWd2 'i'xb2 9.tbb3 tlY83 10~,bfS '" B.~d2 tlYxb2 9.tbb3' ~a310.Ji.xf6 gxfS11.~e2 hS12.0-0 tbcS,13.Wh1 ~' gxfS 11';~e2 hS12.0~O' tbd713.~h1 ~.i.d7 14.tbb1 ~b4 1S:'iVe3 tiJe7! h414.h3 bS1S.n ad1 i.b7 ,1S.fS 1:%cS 1S.c4 fS 17.83 'iVa4 ' 18.tiJc3 ~c6 .~ 17.fxeS fxe6 1S.'*'d4 1;..e719.~g4 19.tbCt4 ifcS 20.exfS .i.g7 21.fxe6 , CZic5 20.l:!.f3 tbxb3 2tcxb3 _'ii'cS' fxeS22 JIad1 ', 1;..xd4 , 23.'ihd4 22~Ji.xe6 " 'ii'xd4 · 23.trxd4 ·, g cS "iVxd4 24..l:!xd4 tbfS : 2S.l:td2 :IcS " 24.tbd5 bS 25.n d1' .l:!hS 2S.~xfS+; 2SJ H3 rJi;e7 27.rJi;g1 h4 2S.~d3 J:tcS .;·..txf6 ", 27.ItxfS n heS 2S..tf5 "d5 29.1t.xfS ' n xfS , 30.l:tfd3 , ': ttxf429.iLgS+ cJ;>dS 30.exCiS e l:lcxdS 3UlxdS $.c6 32.cS .l:l:hfS 33.h3 '" 31JbdS+ ' .b dS ,' 32J':If2 ~ei. n fH 34.Wh2 l1c1 3SJ:tSd3 Itff1 33.Wh2 ' Wd6 34•.td3 1:%e1 3S.i.e2' 3S.tbd1 e5 37.tbf2 lIg1 3S.tbd1 l:te1 rJi;cS -3S.$.f3 .ie637.l:te2 . Itxe2 ~, 39.l:I.dS e,~ 40.n 2d4 a5 41.tbf2 e3 ,3S.i.xe2 ~b4 39.a4 .bb3 4o...b b5 112- 1/2 ' 42.lbh4 ' exf2 43 ..tth7+ :' '.t>eSaxb541.axbS wxb5 . 44.n hS+ wf7 0-1 . -, ','" " 4 Keres,Paul ' . '," .... :..... ;. Fuderer;Andrija ' ," ',' 1; " '" Go thenhurg izt i955 ( 16) ' ,~ , 1.e4 cS '2.tbf3 'dS a.Cf4 cxd4 4.tbxd4 Short,Nigel " tbfS ,S.tiJc3 as S..ltg5 eS 7.14 '\IkbS -',,' • Kasparov,Garry LondonWchm 1993 (4) ," .. S:~d2 ~xb2 9.:tb1 fHa3 10:e5 tbfd7; ·11.fS tbxeS " 12.fxeS .fxeS 13..lte2 1.84 cS 2.tbf3 dS :3.d4 cxd4 "tbbcS 14.tbxcS bxc61S.tbe4 dS ' 4.tbxd4 tbf6S.tbc3 86 6.~g5 ·e6 1S.0-0 'flYa417.i.h5+',d7· 1BJlxfB' 7.14 "'bS S.'ifd2 'ilixb2 9.tbb3 'ifa3 ' , " ' , 1-0 :10.i.xf6 gxfS 11.i.e2tbc6 12.0-0 ;";.. '" ~d7 13.wh1 hS ' 14.tbd1 .:tcS '.', 1S.tbe3 Wb4 1S.c3 'iVxe4 17.~d3 Bilek,Istvcm , , Fischer,Robert :,; ,'it'a4 1B.tbc4 .l:tc7 19.tb bS 'it'a3 20.J:i8e1 " tbe7 2Vb c4 llxc4 - Stockholm izt 1962 (5) " ,i 22 ..ixc4 'h4 23.i.d3 f5 24.$.e2 1.e4 cS2.tbf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.tbxd4 ~g7 2S.c4 h3 , 26.g3 dS 27..af3 tbf6 S.tbc3 as S~gS eS 7.14 'iibS dxc4 2S.:e3 c3 ' 29..l:txc3 ' .l1I.xc3 ; B.'ifd2 ii'xb2 9.l:!b1 'iVa310.eS dxeS 30:iYxc3 0-0 3U%g1 l:[cS :: 32.tns ·11.#xeS tbfd7 12..l1I.c4 i.e7 13 ..l1I.xeS ~cS 33.$.xcS l:txc6 ,34;g4 ' tbgS 0-0 14.0-0 , ~xg5 15:ii'xgS hS 3S.gxfS ' exfS ' 3S.'fj'xf5 , ",x'a2 ·1S:'ifh4 ,,' ~xc3 17.l:txf7 " l:txf7: 37.'it'xh3 ~c2 3S.fS :tc3 39.ti'g4 1B.'\i!t'dS+ tbfS 19..l11.xf7+ ~xf7 lhb3 40.fxgS 'lWcS+ 0-1 20.l:tfH,-'~'(9S 21.Il:xfB .ltd7 ,22,tbf3 ~.
~
'.".~.
348
""
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6. il.gS "' ,
''''
d o'
,~~ , ~2
.. _,..,.... , 1'
.
;~, . t>" ,'
"..,
.. - ~
,.""'.
.:p.
.~
'ii'e3+ 23:;th1lWc1 + 24.ttJg1 'li'xc2 ;2S.rIg8 'tlYf2 26.J:tf8 'ii'xa2 27.%113 ~rbh7 ~ 0-1
tLlc617.c3 (l7.tLlxe6!!] ,· 17...'ii'a3 18.0~OO-0 19.ttJf6+ tLlxf620..bf6! , ttJxd4 2UIxd4 .§t..xd4 22.'ti'xd4 gxfS ~ ., 23.exf6 'iYaS 24.h4 h7 2S •.td3+ ~ Tal,Mikhcrll 'iiffS 26.J:te1 .llg8 27.rbh2 a5 28.g4 'c Tolush.Alexander .. ", ,,'" 1i'xd3 29:iixd3+ It;h8 30.J:reS J:!.xg4< . Leningradch-URS 1956 (17) , 3Uth5 ,Ug6 32.'i!Yd8+ rbh7 33.'lWe7 ·1.e4 cS 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 cXd4 4.tLlxd4 ' "' ,. .." 1-0 ' ,tt:Jf6 S.tLic3.'a6 6..tg5 'a6 7.14 'i!YbS ., , ,.8"'lW~2 'iixb2 9.J:tb1 .' iia310.e5 dxe5 ' . Motylev,Alexander ' ~ 11.fxe5 ttJfdF 12.lZle4 'iWxa2Anand,Viswanathan 2 ... h6!] 13.nb31ii'ai + 14.<;i;>f2 'ii'a4 Wijk aan Zee 2007 (2) ; 15.i.b5 [15.tLlxe6!:I"-] 15...axb5 1.e4 cS 2;tLlf3 dS 3.d4 cxd4 4.tLlxd4 l16.tLlxb5 .c\ ftf 17.exf6 gxf6?,. " ttJf6 5;tt}c3 a6 6.~g5 eS 7.14 'ii'b6 :[l7.::ihe4!]· ~8..lle1 1:[a6 i9.i.xf6 , 8.'iWd2. 'ii'xb2 9.111)1 1fa3 10.e5 h6 I tLlxf6 20.ttJxf6+ Wf7 21.l:rf3'ii'h4+ : : ii.i.h4'dxe5 12.fxeSttJfd7 '13.tLle4 22.>f.i'f1 e5 23~1!Yd5+i.e6 24.tLld7+ C' 'i!Yxa214.J:!:d1 'i!Yd51 TK~parov's sug~ ' \ 1o>g6 . .. 25.tLlxe5+" rbgl 26.J::tg3+ " gestion] 15....e3 'ifxe5 16.i.e2 i.c5! ,'ii'xg327,'ifxb7+·· ttJd7 28.hxg3 nb6 ": 17..§t..g3 ,bd4 .· 18.r:txd4 'ii'aS+' ' 29Jlt'c7 .tc5 30.tLlxd7 ~c4+ . 31.l%e2 ;· .19.nd2 0-0 20.i d6 lld8 21.'iifg3 t , .i-0 'ii'f5 . 22 ..te5 'Wg6 23.Wh4 tLlc6 ;, " 24.0-0 [24 ..th5] 24...15 25•.th5 'YWh7 ~ Radjabov,Teimour .~ " 26.Ab2 fxe4 27.:f7 tU8 28.'fiYf2? " :·Ariand.Viswanathan , ' .;.. [28.lhg7 'iYxg7 29 ..§t..xg7 rbxg7 , Rishon-le.. Zio~ Weh bhtz 2006 (5) 30.1r'g3+ ~h8 3 L'iYg6=] 28... l:txf7 .1.e4 c5 VZlf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.tLlxd4 29.'iixf7+ ~h8' 30.:f2 e5 3i.'iYd5 tLlf6 " 0-1 ~ ,ttJf6 5.tLle3 a6 6.~g5 e6 7.14 'fi'bS S:fi'd2'i!Yxb2 9.l:Ibi 'iYa3 i0.e5 dxe5 " 1 11.fxe5tLlfd7 ..12.l2Je4 "h61 13.iUl4 ,'eAnand,Viswanathan '[13.A b5! ?!] i3 ...'Wa4? i4.J1Le2 ttJcS? Van Wely.Loek ; i5.ttJxe6!+- g5i6.ttJf6+ . ' 1-0 '" Wijk aa~ Zee2007 (9) " ' " , ' , . ' , . <' 1.e4 c5 2.tLlf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.
!rt
~ Radjabo~.Teimour
J', "
349
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 :;'-"~.--1
~.~"
'''>'>;~~'''-;'
.,.~~ ••
.-:.....
.-"'i~-'),~~'.:e;..
'O.:t."-',( ' ••:
·'".Jt~.,4!~'.l'i;~i"··
~-
..:
:'ot~:
"':-"L~.~
..
~'~~
";
\~,.~
;29.~k11 7.gS hS1S . .l:thd1 .l:tdSJ9.a4 hxgS';• lit -, . " . " _' , •. ',- :. : , . v:.;:'.". : 21':-,·',', ". ' '.. . " " ;'it>fS 41.J:.d1 c·\~;'~f:;; .. ;·5:~.;;,r;·;:, '1:0 ,'., ':.'~ 20:axbS gxf421.bxaS 'iVbS 22.l:ta4 ' n
•
-.
•
'
.....
.
"
"
'.'
-,
;
,:
'
".
~
'
~,
~;~~~~1~ji~~~i~~}1¥!~H~:~i:~~~2f:~gii::~
: ·.Monte Carlo 19.67 (ll)-">~;;\' :";:~";_' '·,~;'i< 30.'ifxg7 : d5 > 31.i.xd5 ..:;:exdS ;
r1.e,4 'c5 2.~- ~gi)
,tbfS ' 5/bc3aS .S:~gS ' eS ' 7J4'WbS ; '::;~:'~4.l:1xf~'f: ~f4 :::;' 3!Ut xf4 ;.::f'l1g2 : i,S.'Wd2:"'xb2 9.l:tb1 ii'a3.10:f5 '¢ .c 6 ":.> 3S ....d4+:;;~ ~gS.. {. 37.~7 . :;: J:.xa7+ : ~11.fxe6 ; fxe~ ' 12.ltixd;bxe(1(e5 ,J~i}is~1Wxa7 .l.'t~C239.'it'd4 f540.'~WXd5.; itt::ld514.
,r'
ij~~~~~~ll~!ti~t~i1I~;~:i~~
;1.e4 e5 2.l1Sf3 dS 3:d4 cxd44.tbxd4 '::;~~~·~f6 5.f8 13~b5 ~11.fxeS fxeS "12.;14~xf6 ' gxf6 ·;15.li:le4 iJ.e7 ;::~i:~ 16..txe5 '· Cfi'bS+ ~,:,:; 17.Wh1 i": dxeS : i1S:Jl.e2 ' h5':17.Jlb3 "'84'~18.': ',1 :24..Iolb8_e725.l:tf21!l'd426... f3e4 ""~j;,,~.,, ",""" ,,, v\"J', .·:-, ~,' ) ~
~
•
•_
,
" , " ._
'
_.,'. .
•
"
'-.
.
"'.-
.
'~'
• • ".'
. " _
,.~, ,~, ,
-"'-:~
' .,
; " .
"
:'-'~ ',.;.
•
,.
'.
',' ,,"'
..,
-',
•
~
•
127J!ff4l:19428.'fi~7+ 'it,~7 29.~xc8 ';j~i:~/t;··:_f.> ;,~,\;,;:::~~,. y:~l;'~::;
'fb:e7 -30.l:1xc7+ ;:~dS . 31 :~87 '" e3 ~){?;~;: Gligoric,Svet~zar.,,;:.;). •32.l:te2 l:1e4\ 33JbaS ·we5"34.l:ta3 \ ';;,;~,>, , Fischer,Robert :: ',,\,/:}:;
."
.",
'
_,
. 'to
$
. '~~~~;;"':I '" .
~;'#~~~i~l~1~~~l}~~f,~~~~$~~§~
.tum j4:"iWgS J:.If7 ;15.fi:ic:tlS+".wgs : ~4.t!Jxd4 ",t2::IfS ,. 5;ttJc3aS).~g5 ~ ~6J~\ 1s.'~9·S:+'·~f,: llg'( :~ .17.~xesf;" . ~h8 : ~1.e4 ' e5 " 2.
350
Sicilian Defence - Najdorf 6'£.95 '<~
......'V..;I'~~.'iM' ... "...7'!' ...... ~
';;$!"'~.'"
•.~ ..
~,
' -~~.,
:
","I ':'.<~·'
...",~.... ;e......,,4'*'''''''''''~.'~'' -
'' , ''''
11S.$.xd7 tDxd7 ':' 19.0-0-0 :,· tDe5 ''>; ~;'' Spassky,Boris ;20.'iVd5 ';;'£94 ', 21.J:tdf1 '; .bg5+;': ':..):: Fiscli'er,Robert .• ,': -' ". " "." . <2~;:bg5 ·. ~xg5*: 23.wb1 .:,;''ife7;: ''':1:<' Rey~iavikWcnm 19 ~ 2 (15) ····'0: ., :' :24.'Wi'd2 .i.e6 :25.g3 :· J:td8 : 2S.l:tf4 ·'.,,;' 1.e4 c5 2.tDf3 dS 3.d4cxd4 4.lt:Sxd4 ; ~g5 21.'ilff2~gS2S~J:td{nf129.b3 >:' tt:lfS ' 5.tDc3 SJl.g5 ' ·eG ~ 1.f4: li.:e1 ;:'ii'e7 .: 30.'ii'd4 , tLlgS ~:3.1.J:txf1 'ii'xf1 .;;;"·8.'li'f3 , ~c7"9.0-0-0 ~bd7 10.:td3b5 ~~,
'~-, .,
".
-.,', .
, '-;',
".~"'. '
,~,'
.~. ..'''
.
';,.
as"
~2g~~'~1~~i~~~~~~t!.tELE:~:~·1~·
;; " H&kendotf di:GER 2004 (S) ·· :~t~(:?~~<~',,~::;:·A.fS , 22.g3 ' h5 23.e5 dxe5 24.fxe5 ';1.&4<:5 2~tLlf3dS3:d4cxd4 4.tDxd4 'C:::': ~h825.tDf3 ' ndS 72S..ttxd8+:::xtxdS'
di:JfS :5.0c3·' a6 c S.~g5 :; eS ; 7.f4 " hS :~;~~/ 2Ubg5 h ,eS 2a1!fxf7):tdi29.~xh5' :S.i.h4 ·Ji:.e7 , 9."f3\~'ifc7 . 1 O~O-O-O " :,? ;';'hc3 '; 30.bxca 1WbS+' 3V;i;d ' 'iVa5 ~tDbd7 '·.11.~d3 g5 ';:. 12.fi95":: ~e5 ~~~: 3iVl'h8+ li'a133.a4 lbd3+ .34bd3' '..13.iVe2 tbfg4'. 14.lbf3·tbxf3 ·15:-ifxf3 :~;?;"U:txd3 : 35.wc2 ..; J:td5 . 3SJ~e4' J:tdS :hx95 ·':16.ig3 , tD~5 · 17.he5 ;:·d)(e5 ~'::;::;::~37.'iWg7. 'i!ff5 aai;pb3 'iVd5+,- "39.Wa3· l. . • •.. ',' ," ',"". ' , ' , . , -. "," - '.,'" :' i ',1S.l:tdf1 J:h7 ,1 9.M b5 ' 20.'it'b1 ·· J:tg~';~ic·'Wi'd2 ; 40.:Ib4 .'; 'fic1+:;4Utb2 .'ii'a1+: : 21.hxg5 ' b4 <'22:9~ '; bxc:3 ,23:gXt7+", Y~'·42.:a2 'ti'c1 + 4a.J:b2 'ii'a1+ \ 112-112: iwd7 24.fS''fU '; ~, 25:'iYxfS ,: :~S ;';\';~' ;'~l;;;,<,\ c.' ,",,)::'»:;,' ):": ,. '; t 2S.~c4 'iVa7 27..'i:xeS·J:tbS 2s:id5+ >1~.': . !:Kholiri.ov,Ratmir : ', ;:"\.c " .,J i~C7 ' 29.1Wxe7+" lIxe7 ' 30.b3 ~b7 t,,'i:\i:Bronstein:;David '; ';: .:" . ': 'J '31 ::txb 7 ~xb 7 32.rlh3 .i%gS 33.l:ixc3 ~L:~i,·.,::Kicv ch~uRi; 1964(1 7) ' N,." .. .. ~ \l:txg2 ;3d[f5 ,:J:t82 .35.l:lc4 '· J:teS ':\h:E;4 <:5 'Vpf3 ltJfS 3.tiJc3dS 4.d4 ~ 36,b7AOJ%dS 'nM ' 41..11d5 ; ' S.l!ff3 'Wi'c7 .9.0-0-P tDbd7 10.g4b5 ~bS42.l%b5';'·~aS43.i:tCs ;<':\:,; 1-0 ;·';~:' .J1 ..bfS gxf6 :12.f5tt:le5 : 13:~h3 ·O·O· ,~~
f:.1:":'}"~~:;;~~;;':;;~;T·:,,.,..,. :;:i:;: ~: i; r~10i~}~ ~ : {;~·.·~.~· ~~~~,.,1~~~:.·;~7:~ f:':~~1~'~~;'
, .' Selimiroyic,Dragoljub ':~\~'\,;k\ !~'.. ' . 19.e5! ~itg5+20.1bg5 fS ' 21.exdS . r·:,; tju~j~Vic;Ljubo:n#i"~·f., ;,?;;::~{f:';~, ~f7,. 2'~:l:t93 ~ bxc(: ~3.i,C4 ,"~xb2+: ~ ~; UU:lag ch- YUG 19 72 (Ii}>:;. ;",; .' ~~;;.::~;;'L·: 24~Wb1 ~ tDdS25Jldg1 ~a 7 2S.d 7 ;,1.e4 C5 2.tDf3 'dS 3:d4 cxd44.ti)xd4 ,:,f'(:; J:txd7 27.fxeS ·tDxe6 2S..be6 ~d1+: ftiJfS' 5.tDc3 a6 , S.2.g5 '. eS ' 7.14 ·~ Jieti.~·; 29.J:txd1 ' j;.:xe6 '':' 30,wxb2 .. l:I.bS+. ~S.'ii'f3 'ii'c7,9.0-0~Ott:lbd7 , 10..td3 1,5 :,::;( 31.Wa(::.'~itxa2 ":';;32JXgd3 " Ve7 . 11.l:I.he1 · ib712.0d5lbxd5 '13~exd5 '':;~':'·33:q;;xa2 'it'eS+ 34.J:tt)3 .;;;< 1-0 ; ~xg5 14.J:IxeS+ fxe615.lbxeS Wa5 ';;· .•. , , - : , .....:. .~ ~ 1S~1Wh5+"gS ,17.'ii'xg5 ngs1s.ild2 ~: ~,c;!;r. .vuckovic,Bojan ... ~ \lilfS ' 19.tt:ixfS :. 'ifdS 20.tt:lxhl ii'xgS ·J(: Nakamura,Hikar'U ,:f " .:' .',f, ; 21.fxg5 Wf7 22.tt:lfS J:thS 23:g3 JtcS:::. _ .+Bednudaio'02 ·(sf "':' :".:'"c ' ,~ ' 24.M ~f5 25.iW.xf5 gXt52S.h5 :ta7,'. :':;'\1:M ~c5 2.4:)f3 dS .3.d4 cxM' 4.tDxM ~27.1:If2" ::::>~,,,,:.1{ ;,;. ,~ ..~~" .. '~ 1:o~;,,~~tpf65.tzJc3 · ,aS ~ S~g5 .~ e6 . 7J4 , ~ei 351
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1
8.~f3 ~~7 ' 9.~o-O
tbbcti '10;4 b5 '>'{ 33.~ iith2':w:it&; '~h6" 3si96+
11.£W6lllxf612.gSCUd713.f5 iixg5+ !J;>h5 36.J:c6 ~d8 3711c1 ' iYh4 38lic7 14.';;'b1 cues 15.,*,115 'iVe7 16.CUxe6 . Wg5 39.a4 llh1 4Ollxht ' 'ilYxh1+' AxeS 17.fxe6 ", gS . 18.exf7+ " cl;xf7 '.', 41.Ws2 'iM4 42.tIc4 'ii'd143ie6 ~e3 19.~3 ~7 20.CUd5 '{lidS 21,'iiVc3l:ta7 , 44..td5 ,~2 45.l:IcS ~1 46~b3 'ii'e2 22.'Wa3 'ifb8 23.h4 .£h6 24.h5 as ' 47J:[c4 'it;>d2 48J:[c5ffxe4 49~5 25.Ae2 b4 2S.'tirg3 llf7 27,hxg6 hxgS cl;c1 SOJ:rd5 '§fe2 51.a5 e4 52J:tdS e3 28ih5 'ii'fS 29Jthg1 .tf4 30.CUxf4 '.; 53.aS ~g2 54.ne6 'ifg7 55.C3 '\&'g2 : ' J:xf4 31..bgSJ:g4 32.~xe5+ dxe5. ,".."_,,, ' ....," .;."". · ·~~ . .,0:1 :
352
Index of Players The numbers refer to pages. If the page number is bold the player was Black.
A Adams
18,104,113, 114,115,232, 236, 241 , 261, 277,293,315, 335 226 Adly 242 Akopian 34,44,129,214, Alekhine 214 Alexandrov 76 18,328 Alexeev 76,130,274, Almasi 278,305 39,40,41,55, Anand 97,104,105, 114,114,134, ]57,168,250, 251,251,252, 252,260,269, 293,305,312, 315,335,335, 336,349,349, 349 28,56,89,277 Anderssen Andersson 269,315 76 Annageldyev 221 Antoms Arizmendi Martinez 328 75 Arkhangelsky Arlandi 315 85, ] 05 Aronian
Asrian Avrukh
152, 178 292
B
Bachin Bacrot Bareev Barle Bauer Beliavsky Belov Benjamin Benko Bernstein Bertok Bilek Bird Bischoff Bisguier Bogoljubow Boleslavsky Bologan Bondarevsky Borozan Bosch Botvinnik Brandenburg Bronstein Bu Xiangzhi Byrne
232 259 168 264 35 104, 113, 134, 328,346,350 313,314 129 168 226 350 348 ] 89 ]78 89 312 98,98 114, 168, 240 177 31 286 98, ] 77,2]4, 216,216,217 65 ]58,351 304 269 353
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume C Canal Capablanca Carlsen Castaldi Cebalo Chandler Chekhover Chiburdanidze Chigorin Ciocaltea City London City Paris Cosulich Cueto Chajtur
65 75,81,85,104, 214 227,261 35 303 241 302 346 55,55,89 86 174 174 172 66
Fernandes Fernandez Filippov Fine Fischer
Flamberg Friedel Fuderer
315 28 241 56 29,40,56,86, 89,96, 115,130, 143,156,158, 172,215,217, 221,221,240, 268,275,294, 294,322,323, 323,347,347, 348,350,350, 351 28 323 348
D
D'Arminio 66 De Firmian 328 De la Paz 268 De la Riva Aguado 275 Del Rio Angelis 264 Dominguez,L. 134,323,328 Dorfman 313 Dreev 75, 149 Du Shan 34 Dufresne 56 Dunne,A. 16 Dunne,F~ 16 Dvoiris 286,346 Dvoretsky 282 E
Efimenko Ehlvest Epishin Euwe
275,331 157, 268 269 96, 158, 236
G
Ganguly Gelashvili Gelfand Geller German Gik Gjedsted Gligoric Godena Golubev Gonzalez,B.M. Grischuk Griinfeld Guido Gupta Gustafsson
65, 286 153 157,331,345 233, 233, 323, 350,350 40 303 21 56,350 47,89,227,285 305 261 48,251,278, 278,304,322 29 31 55 81
H F
Fedorov
354
18,29,304,312, 324,324
Hansen,S.B. Harikrishna Hector
268,335 82,281 31
Himanshn Hjartarson Hort Hon Yifan Hracek
242 16 232 292 303
Ilyin Zhenevsky Inarkiev Iordachescn Ivanchnk
35 302 187 129, 134, 143, 153,157,241, 260,261, 274, 281,281,329, 336,336 251
Ivanovic
J Jobava John Jonkman K Kamsky Karjakin Karpov
Kasimdzhanov Kasparov
Kanfmann
303 195 226
125,195 335,335,349 14,39,39,83, 114,114, lIS, 143,153,168, 250,274,302, 303,304,313, 313,330,348 114,260,336, 348 39,41,54,55, 76,97,114,114, 142,153,157, 251, 260, 268, 274,278,305, 312,314,315, 322,322,329, 335,348 34
Kavalek Keogh Keres Khalifman Kholmov Kieseritzky Kobalia Kortchnoi
Kosintseva,N. Kotov Kotronias Kottnaner Kovacevic,S. Kovalev Kovalevskaya Kovchan KOZllI Kramnik
Kryvornchko Kiirschner Knzmin,A. Knzmin,G. Kuznbov
39 220 96,312,348 302 351 28 262 21,39,82,83,143, 174,196,221,292, 304 286 281 104,114,130 240 31 221 221 334 227, 293, 293 18,39,40,40, 76,105,153, 168,169,232, 232,241 334 187 246 105,220 242
L
Lahno Lalic Landa Lanka Larsen Lasker,Em. Lantier Leko
303 264 32,275 324 124,217,260 55,81,81,135, 142,215,226 314 40,104, lOS, lOS, 129, 153, 169,252,252, 261 355
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume Lilienthal Ljubojevic Luther Lutsko
M Macieja Malakhov Malinin Mamedyarov Marco Mariotti Maroczy Marshall Martz Marusenko Mas Hafizulhelmi Maslak McShane Mecking Megaranto Messa Metger Miagmarsuren Mieses Miladinovic Miles
Milov Miton Monticelli Moradiabadi Morozevich
Morphy Motylev Movsesian Movsziszian Murey 356
41,281 285,293,304, 315,351 348,351 324
31,274 157 105 51,157,227 34 21,56,220 187 16,104,142 130 282 81 178 221,242 82 323 220 97 172 16 275 44,168,227, 303,304 268 281 48,65,76 332 97,152,153, 157,242,292, 322 28 232,349 311 324 75
N
Nisipeanu Nunn
66,216,240,313 65,129,189, 269,351 221 196,240 153 313 216 75,178,214, 215,215 275,322 21,44,304
0 Okhotnik Olafsson,F. Onischuk Ost Hansen Ostermeyer Ott
134 133 331 21 236 351
Naiditsch Nakamura Naranja Nataf Nauryzgaliev Nevednichy Nijboer Nimzowitsch
P Panno Pantaleoni Pasik Paulsen Peng Xiaomin Petrosian Piket Pillsbury Pirc Pogrebissky Pohla Pokojowczyk Polerio Polgar,]. Polugaevsky Ponomariov Popovic,A.
350 314 28 89,277 34 156 54,261 55, 187 142 216 282 172 66 104,134,314, 331,331 330, 346, 346 47,48,97, lOS, 228,250 149
Porreca Portisch Postny Prokes Psakhis
350 187 65 113 262
Sedlak Shabalov Shanava Shirov
Q QiJingxuan Quezada
348 335
Short
Ragozin Rashkovsky Rauzer Ree Reshevsky Reti Riazantsev Rodzinski Romanenko Romero Holmes Rossolimo Rowson Rubinetti Rubinstein Rublevsky
35,216 66,82, 240, 277, 349,349 98,214 346 302 96 96,98 28,168,302 196 34 242 14 240, 242 285 322 189,236 51,274,281
Shtyrenkov Smeets Smirnov Smyslov
S Sakaev Salov Salwe Sandipan Sanz Alonso Satyapragyan Sax Schallopp Schlechter Schulten Schulz
227,311 285,324 178 242 227 226 313,313 48 89,113,264 28 16
R
Rabinovich Radjabov
So Socko Sofrevski Sokolov,A. Sokolov,L Sokolsky Soppe Sosonko Spanton Spassky
Spielmann Spraggett Stefansson Steiner,E. Steiner,L Steinitz Strikovic Stulik Sulava Sulskis
286 243 227 18,18,29, IDS, 134,241,251, 261,278,293, 303,336 55, 130, 130, 232,233,236, 260,293,322, 33 I, 33 I, 348 76 157,313 304 41,96,96,98, 217 314 195 324 216,324 61 96 66 302, 305 2 82 29,115,124, 130,133,143, 232,233,233, 240,252,268, 294,294,294, 323, 346, 347, 347,351 28,28,29, 76 324 196 85,129 215 61,189,214 262 142 264 264, 268 357
Chess Opening Essentials - Volume 1 Sveshnikov
Svidler
157,178,226, 246,250,251, 252,252 105, 124, 134, 143,261,269, 314,331
T Tal
Toth Tseshkovsky
158,168,187, 215,275,292, 328, 346, 349 28,28,81,97, 187,189,269 35,168,302 133,174 264, 269 195 21 130,133,216, 281,303,313, 345,350 124,149,227, 227,259,303 236 349 lIS, 125, 142, 169,312,312, 315,336 39 252
U Unzicker
115
V Vallejo Pons Van den Doel Van Wely Varga Vasquez
169 61 251,349 130 31
Tarrasch Tartakower Tatai Taubenhaus Teichmann Thingstad Timman
Tiviakov Tkachiev Tolush Topalov
358
Velimirovic Vera Verlinsky Vidmar Vlassov Vocaturo Vogiatzis Vo1kov Volokitin Von Bardeleben Vuckovic Vul
130,324,351 312 44 48 228 89 32 187 189 61,135 351 75
W
Wagman Ward Winawer Wippermann Wirig
264 304 214 278 332
Y
Yakovenko Yandemirov Ye Jiangchuan Yermolinsky Yu Shaoteng Yusupov
292 85 233 243 35 216,216
Z Zavadsky Zeleic Zhang Zhong Zhukhovitsky Zivkovic Zoldan Zugic Zuidema Zukertort Zunker
323 293 262 294 149 314 286 305 48 275