Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics

HANDBOOK OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS

This isVolume 7 of SEPARATION SCIENCE AND T E C H N O L O G Y A reference series edited by Satinder Ahuja

HANDBOOK OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS Edited by

David Garfin Biotechnology Consultant Kensington, California

Satinder Ahuja Ahuja Consulting Calabash, North Carolina

ELSEVER ACADEMIC PRESS Amsterdam - Boston - Heidelberg - London - New York - Oxford Paris - San Diego - San Francisco - Singapore - Sydney - Tokyo

ELSEVIER Inc. 525 B Street, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101-4495 USA

ELSEVIER B.V. Radarweg 29 P.O. Box 211,1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

ELSEVIER Ltd The Boulevard, Langford Lane Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB UK

ELSEVIER Ltd 84 Theobalds Road London WClX 8RR UK

0 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

This work is protected under copyright by Elsevier Inc. and the following terms and conditions apply to its use: Photocopying Single photocopies of single chapters may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws. Permission of the Publisher and payment of a fee is required for all other photocopying, including multiple or systematic copying, copying for advertising or promotional purposes, resale, and all forms of document delivery. Special rates are available for educational institutions that wish to make photocopies for non-profit educational classroom use. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) 1865 843830, fax (+44)1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). In the USA, users may clear permissions and make payments through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; phone: (+1)(978)7508400, fax: (+1) (978) 7504744, and in the UK through the Copyright Licensing Agency Rapid Clearance Service (CLARCS), 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P OLP, UK; phone: (t44) 20 7631 5555; fax: (+44)20 7631 5500. Other countries may have a local reprographic rights agency for payments. Derivative Works Tables of contents may be reproduced for internal circulation, but permission of the Publisher is required for external resale or distribution of such material. Permission of the Publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations. Electronic Storage or Usage Permission of the Publisher is required to store or use electronically any material contained in this work, including any chapter or part of a chapter. Except as outlined above, no part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Publisher. Address permissions requests to: Elsevier’s Rights Department, at the fax and e-mail addresses noted above. Notice No responsibility is assumed by the Publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. First edition 2005 ISBN: 0-12-088752-5

@ The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of ANSINSO 239.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). Printed in The Netherlands.

I

Working together to grow libraries in developing countries www.elsevier.com

1

www.bookaid.org

I

www.sabre.org

I

PREFACE xi CONTRIBUTORS xv INCIDENTS OFTRAVEL IN IEF AND IPGS xvii PIER GlORGlO RlGHElTl

1.

Overview DAVID E. GARFIN AND SATINDER AHUJA I. Separations by IEF 2 Evolution and Development of IEF 4 Theory and Simulation of IEF 4 Generation of pH Gradients 5 Slab Gel IEF 5 Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (2-DE) 6 Practices and Pitfalls of Sample Preparation 6 Protein Detection and Imaging 7 Capillary IEF 7 Preparative IEF 8 IEF and Proteomics 9 Chromatofocusing 10 Alternate Electrofocusing Methods 11 Summary 12 References 12

11. 111. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. XIV.

2.

Evolution and Development of lsoelectric Focusing AKOS VEGVARI AND FERENC K l h R I. Introduction 1 3 11. The Rise of Electrophoresis

13 V

vi

CONTENTS

111. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI.

3.

Kolin’s “Isoelectric Spectra”-The Artificial pH Gradient 18 Svensson’s IEF-Vesterberg’s Synthesis 2 1 Progress in Preparative and Analytical IEF 26 The Immobilized p H Gradients 28 Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and Blotting of Proteins 30 Capillary IEF 31 Special Features in the Practice and Theory of IEF 31 ReviewsonIEF 32 Concluding Remarks 33 References 34

Theory and Simulation of lsoelectric Focusing T.L. SOUNART, PA SAFIER, AND J.C. BAYGENTS I. 11. 111. IV.

4.

Principles of Isoelectric Focusing 41 Numerical Simulation of IEF 51 Illustrative Simulations of IEF 57 Summary 66 References 6 7

Generation of pH Gradients TOM BERKELMAN I. 11. 111. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX.

5.

Introduction 69 p H Gradients in the Early History of IEF 70 The Development of Carrier Ampholytes 71 Practical Aspects of Carrier Ampholyte-generated pH Gradients 75 Limitations of the Carrier Ampholyte Method 78 Early Alternative IEF Modes Not Requiring Carrier Ampholytes 79 Immobilized p H Gradients 8 1 Use of Immobilized Buffers in Preparative IEF 84 Practical Aspects of Immobilized pH Gradients 85 References 87

Slab Gel IEF REINER WESTERMEIER I. Introduction 93 11. Equipment 95

vii

CONTENTS

111. IV. V. VI. VII.

6.

The Gel Matrix 97 Polyacrylamide Gels 98 Agarose Gels 108 Dextran Gels 110 Experimental Protocols: Polyacrylamide Slab Gel IEF 111 References 120

-

Two Dimensional GeI EIect rophoresis MARK P. MOLLOY AND MICHAEL T. McDOWELL I. 11. 111. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII.

7.

Introduction 123 Equilibration of First Dimension IEF Gels 124 SDS-Page 128 Protein Detection 133 Gel Reproducibility 137 Practical Applications 138 Advantages and Limitations of 2-DE 140 Summary 140 References 140

Some Practices and Pitfalls of Sample Preparation for lsoelectric Focusing in Proteomics BEN HERBERT I. 11. 111. IV. V. VI. VII.

8.

Introduction 147 Reduction and Alkylation 150 Beta Elimination of Cysteine 152 Carbamylation 155 Stable Isotope Labeling-based Quantitation 157 Sample Homogenization and Nucleic Acid Removal Membrane Proteins 160 References 162

157

Protein Detection and Imaging in IEF Gels WAYNE F. P A T O N I. Introduction 165 Organic Dye Staining 166 Silver Staining 167 Reverse Staining 169 Fluorescence Staining 169

11. 111. IV. V.

viii

CONTENTS

VI. VII. VIII. IX.

Label-less Detection 172 Post-translational Modification Detection 172 Acquiring Images from Stained Gels 173 Conclusion 176 Acknowledgements 176 References 176

9. Capillary lsoelectric Focusing TIM WEHR I. 11. 111. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII.

Introduction 181 Sample Preparation 183 Ampholyte Selection and Sample Introduction 185 Focusing 186 Mobilization Techniques 187 Capillary Selection 193 Minimizing Protein Precipitation 195 Internal Standards for cIEF 195 ImagingcIEF 196 cIEF-Mass Spectrometry 197 cIEF In Microchannels 199 Applications of cIEF 200 References 205

10. Free-Flow lsoelectric Focusing PETER J.A.WEBER, GERHARD WEBER, CHNSTOPH ECKERSKORN, ULRlCH SCHNEIDER, AND ANTON POSCH I. 11. 111. IV. V.

Introduction 211 Principle of FFE 212 Instrumentation 220 Applications 231 Summary 239 References 239

I I. lsoelectric Focusing and Proteomics MELANIE Y. WHITE AND STUART J. CORDWELL I. 11. 111. IV.

Introduction 247 The Proteomics Workflow 249 IEF for Prefractionation 252 IEF in Two-dimensional Electrophoresis 254

ix

CONTENTS

V. Conclusions 259 Glossary 259 Acknowledgments 259 References 260

12. Chromatofocusing DAVID ANDERSON I. Introduction 265 11. Conventional Chromatofocusing (Internal pH Gradient Generation) 267 111. Gradient Chromatofocusing (External pH Gradient Generation) 277 IV. Performance Characteristics 283 V. Applications 288 References 290

I 3. Alternative Electrofocusing Methods CORNELIUS F. IVORY I. 11. 111. IV. V.

Introduction 297 Theory 301 Results 311 Discussion 315 Conclusion 317 Acknowledgments 3 17 References 31 8

Index

321

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Separation science and technology play a major role in protein biochemistry. Of all the methods available for fractionating proteins, none offers higher resolving power than isoelectric focusing (IEF). It can be used in an analytical or preparative mode to separate proteins on the basis of their unique isoelectric points. This technique also lends itself to multidimensional separations because it is compatible with a large variety of other separation methods, especially chromatography and gel electrophoresis, IEF has much to offer protein chemists, and it is generally included in the repertoire of standard laboratory methods of anyone studying proteins at any level. The emergence of proteomics as a mature discipline has brought about a renewed interest in IEF, as it is a rapid and reliable means for protein fractionation. The basic concept of proteomics, massively parallel protein analysis, grew from considerations of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE), where hundreds to thousands of proteins are separated and visualized in a single entity. Two-dimensional gels are an integral part of proteomics research, where they serve as the main separation tool. Since the first-dimension separation of 2-DE is by IEF, the challenge of performing successful 2-DE essentially requires the achievement of good IEF fractionations. This fact has provided the incentive to develop a text that considers IEF in a proteomics context. This Handbook of lsoelectric Focusing and Proteomics is intended to be a single source for relevant information on IEF. The book addresses many of the salient features of IEF and has been written by a panel of experts in the field. The book expands on a chapter dealing with IEF in the Handbook of Bioseparations (S. Ahuja, Editor, Academic Press, San

xi

xii

PREFACE

Diego, 2000), broadening the scope of that material to cover more thoroughly topics that should be of interest to a wide range of readers. We have arranged the subjects in a logical order, beginning with the history of IEF through to alternative forms of focusing. The chapters are independent of one another, and each chapter includes the authors’ special insights and practical tips. Chapter 1 provides a broad overview of IEF and proteomics. The history of IEF goes back to the early days in the electrophoretic analysis of proteins. Chapter 2 discusses the evolution of the technique and includes photographs of some of the pioneers in the field. Theoretical descriptions of IEF covered in Chapter 3 range from simple differential equations to sophisticated computer models. Generation of p H gradients is the key element in IEF; Chapter 4 is devoted to the synthetic molecules used to generate them. The practical aspects of slab gel IEF are presented in Chapter 5. This chapter is designed to be useful to novices and to experienced users as well, and it provides many useful tips and insights. Chapter 6 describes the 2-DE methodology, with an emphasis on the second-dimension gel. The key to successful IEF and, by extension, successful 2-DE, lies in sample preparation. Since protein mixtures vary widely in their properties, no single sample preparation procedure is universally applicable to all samples. Chapter 7 covers many important considerations in sample preparation. The detection methods used for visualizing proteins in IEF gels are explained in Chapter 8. The important topics of image acquisition and analysis are also covered in this chapter. All of the relevant techniques of capillary IEF, along with discussions of their advantages and disadvantages, are presented in Chapter 9. Methods for preparative IEF are described in several chapters. Because of the high sensitivity offered by mass spectrometers, applications of capillary IEF, which generates low quantities of proteins, can be considered preparative. Chapter 10 covers free-flow electrophoresis (FFE), a preparative technique with a great deal of promise. The role of IEF in 2-D gel-based proteomics is addressed in Chapter 11. The pros and cons of 2-DE proteomics are discussed, including the well-known under-representation of hydrophobic or membrane-associated proteins, highly alkaline proteins, high- and low-molecular-weight proteins, and lower abundance proteins in relation to high abundance “housekeeping” proteins. Several methods based on IEF that are designed to overcome these problems are discussed, including preliminary fractionation by IEF and modifications to the standard first-dimension IEF procedures. The final two chapters diverge from descriptions of purely IEF methods in order to highlight related, alternative approaches. Chromatofocusing, discussed in Chapter 12, is a chromatographic technique, rather than an electrophoretic one, and is similar to IEF at very basic levels. This technique is more of a preparative method than an analytical one, since the

PREFACE

pl values obtained are only approximate. It is most often used as part of a protein purification scheme. Chapter 13 considers IEF in the context of related equilibrium gradient methods. In contrast to IEF, the set of alternative methods that are described are in the conceptual or very-early-development phase. They point to some of the possible routes that separation technology can take in the search for efficient techniques for fractionating and purifying proteins. We thank the authors for their excellent contributions. This book should enable anyone working with proteins, from the level of graduate student to senior researcher, to find something useful in the text, as it describes underlying principles of IEF and its many applications, including proteomics. We are sure the readers will be fascinated by Pier Giorgio Righetti’s personal reminiscences on the early development of this technique in the next few pages. David Garfin Satinder Ahuja

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

CONTRIBUTORS

Numbers in parentheses indicate the page on which the authors" contributions begin.

Satinder Ahuja (1) Ahuja Consulting, 1061 Rutledge Court, NW,

Calabash, NC 28467 USA David Anderson (265) Department of Chemistry, Cleveland State University, 2121 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA J. C. Baygents (41) Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA Tom Berkelman (69) Life Science Group, Bio-Rad Laboratories, 6000 James Watson Drive, Hercules, CA 94547 USA Stuart J. CordweU (247) Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Level 4, Building F7B, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Christoph Eckerskorn (211) FFEWeber GmbH, IZB, Building 6, Am Klopferspitz 19, D-82152 Planegg/Munich, Germany David Garfin (1) Biotechnology Consultant, 112 Kenyon Avenue, Kensington, CA 94708 USA Ben Herbert (147) Proteome Systems Ltd., 1/35-41 Waterloo Road, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia Cornelius F. Ivory (297) Department of Chemical Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-2710 USA Ferenc Kilfir (13) Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Ifjfisfig t~tja 6, 7624 P&s and Institute of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Medicine, University of P~cs, Szigeti fit 12, H-7643 P6cs, Hungary

XV

xvi

CONTRIBUTORS

Michael T. McDowell (123) Pfizer Global Research and Development, Molecular Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA Mark P. Molloy (123) Pfizer Global Research and Development, Molecular Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA Wayne E Patton (165) PerkinElmer LAS, Building 100-1, 549 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118 USA Anton Posch (211) Proteoconsult, Assinger Strasse 2a, D-85567 Grating/Munich, Germany Pier Giorgio Righetti (xvii) Department of Agricultural and Industrial Biotechnologies, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie No. 15, 1-37134 Verona, Italy P. A. Sailer (41) Department of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA Ulrich Schneider (211) FFEWeber GmbH, IZB, Building 6, Am Klopferspitz 19, D-82152 Planegg/Munich, Germany T. L. Sounart (41) Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411 USA Akos V~gvfiri (13) Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Ifjfisfig fitja 6, 7624 P6cs and Institute of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Medicine, University of P6cs, Szigeti fit 12, H-7643 P~cs, Hungary Gerhard Weber (211) FFEWeber GmbH, IZB, Building 6, Am Klopferspitz 19, D-82152 Planegg/Munich, Germany Peter J. A. Weber (211) FFEWeber GmbH, IZB, Building 6, Am Klopferspitz 19, D-82152 Planegg/Munich, Germany Tim Wehr (181) Life Science Group, Bio-Rad Laboratories, 6000 James Watson Drive, Hercules, CA 94574 USA Reiner Westermeier (93) Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Munzinger Strasse 9, D-79111 Freiburg, Germany Melanie Y. White (247) Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Level 4, Building F7B, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

INCIDENTS OF TRAVEL IN IEF AND IPGS* PIER G I O R G I O R I G H E T T I

University of Verona, Italy

That winter of 1942 must have been the most dreadful one in the life of poor Harry Svensson. As a young pupil, under the iron fist of Dom Arne Tiselius, he was forced to spend endless days and nights trying to make a dream of his boss come true, namely, the creation of a pH gradient by the stationary electrolysis of a salt solution. Among the innumerable problems encountered, one became immediately apparent: the ionic constituents were completely swept to the opposite-charge electrode. Although equilibrium between ion transport and backdiffusion ensued, at neutral pH, midway in the apparatus where a region of water almost completely devoid of ions formed, ohmic resistance increased enormously with the result that the liquid almost boiled at this point. Luckless Harry was chained to the bench adding salt dropwise from a burette, trying to fight the conductivity minimum. Add to this the fact that it was the peak of World War II: Norway and Denmark were occupied by Germany; Finland was oppressed by neighboring Russia; and Sweden ducked low under a declaration of neutrality, yet under quite miserable conditions. Harry dreamed of escaping this agonizing life and paltry winter, repairing to England, being drafted in the army and sent to the African desert to fight the Italian-German coalition. At least he would have enjoyed sunny days and warm weather! As luck would have it, Tiselius relaxed his iron grip and let Harry present his Ph.D. thesis in 1946 (it was on "Electrophoresis by the Moving Boundary Method"). 1 This was no ordinary thesis, mind you, for Harry's mentors were The Svedberg, a 1926 Nobel laureate, and Tiselius, a future Nobelist (1948). Hapless Harry must have been obsessed for the remainder of his life by this idea of creating pH gradients. Already in 1956 he dreamed of a hypothetical biprotic ampholyte having two intrinsic pK values both equal to 7.0. If it were ever to exist, a solution of it in pure water would be a neutral buffer containing one-fourth of the amount in the cationic and one-fourth in the anionic form. A superb "carrier ampholyte" (CA), indeed, which would offer a substantial conductivity where it was most needed, i.e., in that terrible conductivity "Grand Canyon" located at *A paraphrase of the surely more famous book "Incidents of Travel in Central America, Chiapas and Yucatan, by John L. Stephens, 2 volumes, New York, 1841.

o.

XVII

xviii

P.G. RIGHElTI

pH 7, but which would still be isoelectric and immobile in the electric field.2 Although such a “super-buffer” could not possibly exist, 3 years later, during a leave of absence at Caltech, chez Linus Pauling, Svensson found a real chemical that came rather close to that: histidylhistidine, with pK values at 6.8 and 7.8, thus isoelectric at p H 7.3. It was used with hemoglobins in the first experiment^.^ Once back home, as a freelance at the Karolinska Institute, Harry worked hard on the theory of isoelectric focusing (IEF) and laid down its theoretical foundations in a couple of, by now, classic p a p e r ~ . ~His J secret battle cry as he waged his underground guerrilla warfare against the Maestro’s mammoth instrumentation was: “no more moving boundaries!” He had a point. It had been foolish to try to create stable and stationary p H gradients in the presence of an electric field with non-amphoteric compounds. These would only vacate the grounds and leave an empty trail in their wake with no soldiers to guard the battlefield. All buffers had to be amphoteric and, in addition, they had to have decent buffering power as ensured by not too large ApK values. Only in this way would the zones of isoelectric “carrier ampholytes” form a continuous chain, as the electric field would tie them to their isoelectric zones while diffusion would cause them to broaden just enough to penetrate the neighboring ampholyte zones, thus simultaneously ensuring buffer capacity and conductivity. The result was not just a few moving boundaries, a la Tiselius, but a horde of stationary boundaries, each one standing guard against local p H changes. It was too bad that this army was made up of barely a handful of soldiers, hardly able to cover the grounds in the pH 3-10 interval. Nonetheless, Svensson published, in 1964, some remarkable color pictures of unique hemoglobin (Hb) separations in his 110 mL focusing column stabilized by a sucrose density gradient. In these separations, Harry used protein lysates, notably of casein, albumin, Hb, and whole blood, as background carrier ampholytes. Peptides rich in His provided the much needed buffering power and conductivity in the pH 6-7 gap. Upon his return from Caltech, Harry hired a medical student, Olof Vesterberg, to help him devise a proper synthesis of the much-needed carrier ampholytes. After 3 years of slow progress, though, Svensson became Professor of Physical Chemistry at Gothenburg and the IEF team broke up. Vesterberg continued on this project in Stockholm and, in the spring of 1964, Svensson received a phone call from an excited Vesterberg, who appeared to have solved the problem. Well, he had been moonlighting and poring over textbooks of organic chemistry and had surfaced with a remarkable synthesis of the much wanted “carrier ampholytes”: a chaotic synthesis, to be sure, as chaotic as a medical student could possibly devise. A most ingenious chaotic process, in fact, by which concoctions of oligoamines (from tetra- to hexa-amino groups) were reacted with limiting amounts of an a-punsaturated acid, acrylic

INCIDENTS OF TRAVEL IN IEF AND IPGS

xix

acid.6 Chaos generated order! In a steep voltage gradient, this army of synthetic amphoteres joined arms in an orderly fashion, with each assuming a (quasi) Gaussian distribution about its respective isoelectric point (PI) value.’ Was everything under control then? Well, with such a superb technique (one of the few able to counteract entropy’s tendency to dissipate peaks via diffusion in the surrounding medium by producing sharply focused zones, no matter how carelessly the experiment was carried out), one would think yes, all was quiet on the western front! Svensson and Vesterberg were indeed convinced that a breakthrough had been achieved, and they approached LKB Produkter AB, a Stockholm company, with a proposal for commercial production. As a safety measure, the two pilgrims were sent to the Mecca of Separation Science, Uppsala, to consult with the high priest of electrophoresis, Arne, filius quondam Tiselii (born Tiselius, in current slang). Poor Arne, who had been witnessing the steady erosion of his U-tube method, criticized them, infuriated at the notion that they would dare to bring forward a technique surely bound for failure, considering that macroions, on their approach to PI values, would likely aggregate and precipitate. After such a discouraging pronouncement, the credit for faith and persistence goes to Herman Haglund (like Svensson, a former pupil of Tiselius), who was the head of a small team at LKB involved in separation techniques.* Even though he knew of the discouraging assessment of the “Maestro” on the Svensson-Vesterberg experiments, nevertheless, with the help of his colleagues Holmstrom and Davies, he decided to try to introduce into the market this novel, and quite revolutionary, methodology. He successfully squeezed from a reluctant LKB a bare 60,000 SKr (roughly 5000 euros in modern currency, a true pittance) and went into production of Svensson’s vertical-density-gradient columns and of Versterberg’s CAs. Thus, IEF was born as a preparative technique, requiring 110 and 440 mL columns for operation. An entire experiment, including column setup, focusing, elution, and the analysis of hundred of fractions, required a minimum of 1 week of hard labor! These columns and CAs were at first offered on a free-trial basis to the scientific community. Although during the 1960s the growth of IEF was painfully slow, by the beginning of the 1970s, especially due to the introduction of the analytical counterpart in polyacrylamide gels: IEF enjoyed such a marked growth as to soon become a leading separation technique in all fields of biological sciences. After such a long gestation period and hard trials, one would think that by then Svensson would have enjoyed a deserved glory and have been placed in the Separation Science Hall of Fame. No way! Early in 1970, “Svensson” figuratively died, only to be resurrected as “Rilbe.” We all thought that this was a gentleman’s gesture. Having remarried, we assumed that, to pay a tribute to the feminist movement, Harry had assumed his new wife’s last name. Well, it was a “nome de plume,’’ since

xx

P.G. RlGHETTl

neither of them would give up hidher identity! On Svensson’s side, though, it must also have been a move designed to escape anonymity. When one travels to Stockholm and looks up a name in the telephone directory, one notices that most of the population there seems to be the progeny of just two ancestors: Karl and Sven. About half of the names in the phone book are Karlsson’s, the other half being equally attributed to the Svensson’s. This is just fine, except that Svensson, le pauvre, had made a fundamental mistake. From then on he also published his papers as Rilbe, confusing his followers and closing the door to immortality. In fact, as the IEF technique spread to the most remote villages in the world (I went with LKB people to spread the IEF gospel just about everywhere in the world-even as far as Mongolia!) citations to Svensson skyrocketed and poor Rilbe was left with the remnants of the banquet. It was a great disappointment to most of us devout followers who secretly hoped for a Nobel nomination-perhaps the third one in the series for the Uppsalienses, this unique team of inventors. Troubles came not just from within, but also from the other side of the Atlantic as well. Unbeknownst to Svensson, an obscure physicist, a resident of Chicago, Illinois, had published some papers in 1954-195510>11with a key theme: “the focusing of ions in a continuous pH gradient.” His separations were dubbed “isoelectric line spectra” and, sure enough, just t o pay a tribute to Tiselius, were conducted in a U-tube, with detection by refractive index gradients. In the mid-l970s, Alexander Kolin entered the arena, coming regularly to our Separation Science meetings and claiming his share of glory. In a couple of visionary articles,12>13he even went as far as proposing a rainbow of focusing effects under the general name of “isoperichoric focusing” (the “perichoron” being the environment of the macromolecule, in Greek slang, which attains the same physicochemical properties as the particle under fractionation): isoconductivity, isomagnetic, isoparamagnetic, isodiamagnetic, and isoedielectric focusing. The show was, at least, guaranteed. The two fighters, Svensson and Kolin, had a brawl at each meeting, tearing each others’ vests and stepping on their wigs. Taken individually, though, they both had charming personalities. When I visited Alexander in his magnificent mansion on top of the Bell Air canyon in the suburbs of Los Angeles, in the fall of 1985, he spent a night playing his grand piano, enthroned at the centre of his living room. When, a few months later, I visited Rilbe in the banlieue of Stockholm, he treated me with the same currency. It seems that these mathematicians are as skilled with music as with numbers. But who can claim to be the genuine father of IEF? There is no doubt to my mind that Svensson can. As smart as he was, Kolin nevertheless trod down the old dusty road of attempting focusing in non-amphoteric buffers. This is a lethal alley for anybody aiming at true steady-state patterns. In fact, his technique resembled a “magic black box” and had no followers. No sooner was a pH gradient established (by diffusion, in the absence of

INCIDENTS O F TRAVEL IN IEF AND IPGS

xxi

an electric field) then an applied voltage would begin to destroy it. This was expected and in fact, far from ignoring it, Svensson dubbed Kolin’s approach “artificial pH gradients.” He called his own gradients “natural”, of course, in that they were established and maintained by the current itself. The plot further thickens through the emergence of a third character, unknown to the two gallant fighters as well as to the vast majority of the users of IEF: a mysterious Belgian, Kauman, who discussed a paper at the Royal Academy “on the electrophoretic separation of ampholytes in a medium of non-uniform pH”.I4 This fellow also had quite a respectable godfather, the future Nobel laureate (1977) Ilya Prigogine, who had in fact suggested such an investigation. Kauman’s research came dangerously close to Svensson’s conclusions, which, however, were drawn only four years later. Kauman, too, related the distribution of ampholytes to their PI values. To quote him verbatim: “the distribution of the ampholyte at the stationary state will vary approximately as a Gaussian error function of distance, with the maximum at the isoelectric point.” As in the good old plots of Agatha Christie, the role of the hero (or villain) is revealed in the last pages of the novel. Shall we then crown Kauman with the laurel wreath and dump Kolin and Svensson, with their picturesque quarrels, in the garbage bin? I do not think so. True, Kauman had really dabbled in Svensson’s ideas and anticipated him by four years, but he took the newborn and abandoned it in the bushes, offering it no chance for survival. Svensson and his pupil Vesterberg, as we have seen, had the courage to give birth to this idea and nurture it until adulthood. With that, one would think that the struggle was over and that focusing in amphoteric buffers had assumed the role of prima donna. Not quite! Led by a staunch defender of the impossible (Chrambach, who, in 1978, still claimed “the possibility to form natural pH gradients with nonamphoteric buffer^,")'^ a couple of rebels proposed focusing in a mixture of 47 buffers, mostly amphoteric, quite a few non-amphoteric.16 The use of amphoteric buffers does not violate Rilbe’s commandments, except that all of them were Good’s buffers. Nothing is as bad as Good’s buffers when used in an improper environment, i.e., for buffering in pH regions in which they are powerless, such as at their apparent PI values. The ApK values, for these buffers, range from a minimum of 6 up to a maximum of 9. Had Cuono and Chapo bothered to read Svensson’s papers (as elegantly summarized in his opus magna that was the culmination of a life work, see Figure 2.2 therein),” they would have learnt that, with a ApK = 6, the buffering power is zero for an amphoteric ion at p H = PI (and, for that matter, with a ApK = 4, it is only 10% of the full value it would display at pH = pK), depriving it of its most wanted properties, i.e., of being able to be a good conducting and buffering species at its PI value. Notwithstanding these guerrilla attacks, CA-IEF spread to achieve a prominent position in the realm of biochemical techniques, surely aided by the fact that it was adopted, already in 1975, as the first dimension

P.G. RlGHETTl

of the powerful two-dimensional gel map analysis,l* even today the most popular technique in proteome analysis. There is no way, though, to escape the crippling disease of aging on spaceship Earth. By the end of the 1970s, it was clear that a number of ailments was besieging Svensson’s creature, namely uneven buffering capacity and conductivity, irreproducibility of CA synthesis, and the most-dreaded cathodic drift impeding proper focusing conditions, to name just a few. It was with these problems in mind that we teamed up with LKB scientists to work out a totally new concept, immobilized pH gradients, that This new work of art was seemed to solve all of those problems at unveiled on April 22, 1982, at the electrophoresis meeting organized by Stathakos in Athens and acclaimed with standing ovations. At least that is what we had hoped. In reality, we presented these data to an almost empty room, since most of the delegates had never been to Athens before and opted to enjoy lovely spring weather on the Acropolis, on the Licabetto, on the Plaka, strolling just about around any corner of the capital except the Hellenic Academy of Science, where the meeting was held. The rest is present-day history and is dealt with in most of the chapters in this book, so that it would be a shame for me to continue on these reminiscences.

1. Svensson, H. Electrophoresis by the Moving Boundary Method. A Theoretical and Experimental Study. Alrnqvist & Wiksells Bok., Stockholm, 1946. 2. Svensson, H. Sci. Tools 3:30-35, 1956. 3. Svensson, H. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., (Suppl. 1):132-140, 1962. 4. Svensson, H. Acta Chem. Scand. 15:325-341, 1961. 5 . Svensson, H. Acta Chem. Scand. 16:456466, 1961. 6. Vesterberg, 0. Acta Chem. Scand. 23:2653-2666, 1969. 7. Rilbe, H. Ann. N . Y Acad. Sci. 209:ll-22, 1973. 8. Haglund, H. In Isoelectric Focusing (Arbuthnott, J. P. and Beeley, J. A. Eds.), Buttenvorths, London, pp. 3-22,1975. 9. Righetti, P. G. and Drysdale, J. W. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 236:17-24, 1971. 10. Kolin, A.J. Chem. Phys. 22:1628-1629, 1954. 11. Kolin, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 41:lOl-110, 1955. 12. Kolin, A. In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D. Eds.), de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 3-34, 1977. 13. Kolin, A. In “Electrophoresis ’82” (Stathakos, D. Ed.) de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 3 4 8 , 1983. 14. Kauman, W. G. Clas. Sci. Acad. Roy. Belg. 43:854-868, 1957. 15. Chrambach, A. and Nguyen, N. Y. In “Electrophoresis ’78 (Catsimpooloas, N. Ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 3-18, 1978. 16. Cuono, C. B. and Chapo, G. A. Electrophoresis 3:65-74, 1982. 17. Rilbe, H. pH and Buffer Theory - a New Approach, pp. 31-36. Wiley, Chichester, 1996. 18. O’Farrell, P. H. J. Biol. Chem. 250:40074021, 1975. 19. Bjellqvist, B., Ek, K., Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., Gorg, A. and Postel, W. In Electrophoresis ’82 (Stathakos, D. Ed.), de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 61-74, 1983. 20. Bjellqvist, B., Ek, K., Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., Gorg, A., Westerrneier, R. and Postel, W. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 6:317-339, 1982.

I

OVERVIEW D A V I D E. G A R F I N a A N D S A T I N D E R A H U J A b

~ Consultant, 112 KenyonAvenue, Kensington,CA 94708 bAhuja Consulting, 1061 RutledgeCourt, NW, Calabash,NC 2846 7

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. XIV.

SEPARATIONS BY IEF EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF IEF THEORY AND SIMULATION OF IEF GENERATION OF pH GRADIENTS SLAB GEL IEF TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS (2-DE) PRACTICES AND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING CAPILLARY IEF PREPARATIVE IEF A. Free-Flow IEF IEFAND PROTEOMICS CHROMATOFOCUSING ALTERNATE ELECTROFOCUSING METHODS SUMMARY REFERENCES

Isoelectric focusing (IEF) is one of the most commonly used techniques for the separation of proteins. ~ IEF separations are based on the pH dependence of the electrophoretic mobilities of the protein molecules. Isoelectric focusing, as the name suggests, makes use of electrical charge properties of molecules to focus them in defined zones in a separation medium. It is the focusing mechanism that distinguishes IEF from other separation processes and makes it unique among the separation methods. In most separation methods, diffusion and interaction with the medium act to disperse the bands of separated molecules. In sharp contrast, the basic separation mechanism of IEF imposes forces on the molecules that directly counteract the dispersive effects of diffusion. During the separation process, the molecules in the sample accumulate in specific and predictable locations in the medium, regardless of their initial distribution. This focusing mechanism also distinguishes IEF from various modes of 9 2005ElsevierInc.All rightsreserved. Handbookof IsoelectricFocusingand Proteomics D. Garfinand S. Ahuja,editors.

2

D.E. GARFIN AND S. AHUJA

electrophoresis. In the other modes of electrophoresis, the applied electrical field moves molecules through the separation media at fixed rates, whereas the applied field in IEF establishes and maintains steady-state distributions of sample molecules. It is important to note that IEF is a high-resolution method that is well suited for both analytical and preparative applications. I. SEPARATIONS BY IEF

From the viewpoint of separation technology, IEF is very impressive in resolving capabilities, yet elegant in its operational simplicity. It is favored by separation scientists but used insufficiently by protein biochemists. This may be due to the erroneous impression that IEF is more difficult than it really is. In actual practice, IEF is easy to understand and to perform; however, a complete understanding of IEF requires a strong grasp of a number of physical chemistry principles, including acid-base titrations. Fortunately, almost all the "hard work" has been done by the developers of this technique. As a result, routine experimentation can be carried out with IEF by simply preparing the samples and media and performing the run. As mentioned above, IEF is unique among separation methods. This technique is applicable mainly to the fractionation of amphoteric molecules such as proteins and peptides that can act as both acids and bases. IEF is used mainly to separate proteins for analysis or purification. It measures the isoelectric points (pI) of proteins and uses the unique pI values of proteins to purify them. The pI of any particular protein is defined as the specific pH at which it carries no net electrical charge. Both analytical and preparative versions of IEF have been developed over the years. The basis for electrofocusing lies in the pH dependence of the charges on the constituent amino acid side chains, non-proteinaceous adducts, and prosthetic groups of proteins. By subjecting proteins to electrophoresis in pH gradients, they become focused into well-defined, sharp zones at pH values corresponding to their individual pI. Very subtle differences in the pI values of proteins can be detected with IEE Proteins differing in pI by less than 0.01 pH unit are routinely resolved by IEF, and separation of proteins with pI as low as 0.001 pH unit apart has been achieved. Again, it is the focusing mechanism that distinguishes IEF from other separation processes. In all other methods of separation, diffusion and interactions with the medium act to disperse the bands of separated molecules. By contrast, the forces imposed on proteins in IEF counteract the dispersive effects of diffusion. In particular, IEF is distinguished from other forms of electrophoresis in which molecules move through the separation medium at fixed rates and in one direction from the point of

I

OVERVIEW

application as long as the electric field is applied. During IEF separation, on the other hand, proteins in the sample approach their steady-state positions from any point within the separation medium and stop moving when they reach their pI values. However, once the electric field is removed, the steady-state distribution of molecules collapses and the previously separated proteins diffuse and mix. Proteomics has heightened the interest in IEE Proteomics is an approach to protein biochemistry, which has now emerged as a mature discipline. It can be defined as the systematic, massively parallel analysis of multiple proteins that is particularly well suited to screening experiments. The basic concepts of proteomics grew from considerations of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE), where IEF in polyacrylamide gels provides the first-dimension separation in 2-DE, the keystone separation method of proteomics. Because IEF gels can be made to match seamlessly with the second-dimension sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel, 2-DE is the only multidimensional separation technique in which the resolution obtained in the first dimension is not lost when proteins are transferred to the second separation medium. Literally, thousands of polypeptides, including charge and size isomers, can be resolved in a single 2-DE gel. The number of useful proteins obtainable with 2-DE are restricted mainly by limitations imposed by available detection methods. It was recognized from the outset that IEF provides a simple and reliable means for identifying charge isomers of proteins through differences in their pI values. Coupling IEF and SDS-PAGE in 2-DE affords biochemists and cell biologists a means for visualizing both the charge and size isomers of proteins in a single-gel entity. This is particularly relevant to charge isomers of proteins through differences in their pI values. It is also important in the study of post-translational modifications and their roles in protein function. Thus, IEF is and will remain an integral part of proteomic research and of protein biochemistry, in general. Books devoted exclusively to IEF are rare. The classic monograph on this subject was first published in 1983 by Pier Giorgio Righetti (see photo in Chapter 2); he has been the main source of information on IEE 2-4 This book complements the earlier texts. It is also a useful addition to the series of books on Separation Science and Technology, which is complementary to Handbook of Bioseparations 1 and Bioseparation of Proteins s in the series. In this book, authored by various experts in the field, each chapter presents a unique description of a particular aspect of IEF along with special insights and practical tips about equipment, reagents, and procedures from the specialists in each field. The book is meant to be an initial reference source and yet provides in-depth knowledge of IEF to those engaged in protein research. It is designed to give readers an appreciation of the underlying principles of IEF and its various forms, so that this

4

D.E. GARFIN AND S. AHUJA

powerful technique can best be used to help solve biological problems. For the most part, the chapters provide the working knowledge of mathematical relationships, computational methods, or synthetic organic chemistry. Moreover, the chapters are intentionally independent of each another so that they can function as stand-alone descriptions of particular topics. The highlights of each chapter are given below. II. EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF IEF

A number of the most prominent people in the history of electrophoresis have contributed to the evolution of IEE Through a slight stretch of the imagination, Chapter 2 traces this rich history starting in ancient Greece. However, the first IEF experiments most likely date back to 1912, when Ikeda and Suzuki achieved a separation of amino acids from plant protein hydrolysates in a three-chambered electrolysis cell. They noticed that the amino acids tended to arrange themselves according to increasing isoelectric point (pI) between the anode and cathode. In doing so, the separated amino acids formed a pH gradient between the electrodes. In 1929, Williams and Waterman extended this work by designing a multichamber compartment, which gave better resolution by reducing diffusion and convective disturbances. Although variable field strengths between the electrodes prevented formation of stable pH gradients, by limiting practical applications, these and other uses of the principle of IEF provided useful separation of peptides and proteins. The concept of IEF was initiated by Kolin in his short note on the use of pH and density gradients for creation of "isoelectric line spectra." The main idea was to "focus ions in a continuous pH gradient" that was stabilized by a sucrose density gradient. One of the major obstacles in these pioneering experiments was the lack of suitable ampholytes for development of smooth pH gradients that were also sufficiently stable to allow true equilibrium focusing. Fortunately, these problems were solved, largely through the efforts of Svensson-Rilbe and Vesterberg (see Righetti's reminiscences on page xvii and the photos in Chapter 2). III. THEORY AND SIMULATION OF IEF

The classical theoretical presentation of IEF generally relied on differential equations that could be solved analytically. It provided a description of the principle features of IEF that were adequate for most purposes. The analyses tended to be descriptions of the steady state and did not provide details of the dynamics of focusing. With computer analyses, the assumptions made in the classical theory are not necessary

I

OVERVIEW

5

and the dynamics of focusing are more thoroughly described. As can be seen in Chapter 3, numerical simulations of IEF incorporate the dissociation rates of the components into the transport equations, generalize the discussion to multicomponent systems, and are not restricted to the steady state. The models successfully predict concentration, pH, and conductivity profiles as functions of time. They also describe transient states in the formation of the steady-state distributions of ampholytes and proteins and allow mechanisms of instability to be studied. This chapter is highly mathematical and provides the rational basis for the separations observed in IEE Interested readers willing to make an effort to follow the mathematics and the descriptions of the numerical methods will learn that the entire focusing process with all of its nuances is amenable to physical and chemical analyses.

IV. GENERATION OF pH GRADIENTS IEF is a very useful practical technique where simple methods for establishing and maintaining pH gradients are available. The pH gradient is essential for this technique, and the nature of the pH gradient largely determines the quality and usefulness of the separation. The two most widely adopted methods for generating pH gradients make use of different types of synthetic buffering molecules (see Chapter 4): (a) Carrier ampholytes are amphoteric electrolytes that carry both current and buffering capacity. They possess both acidic and basic functional groups and form pH gradients under the influences of electric fields. (b) Synthetic buffer compounds containing reactive double bonds, called acrylamido buffers, can be incorporated into polyacrylamide gel matrices. When used in the correct proportions, acrylamido buffers generate immobilized pH gradients under the influences of electric fields. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages and are described from a historical perspective in this chapter.

V. SLAB GEL IEF IEF is most commonly carried out in polyacrylamide slab gels. Chapter 5 presents the practical aspects of slab gel IEF, including the use of several other gels that can be utilized for IEE It provides empirical and "how-to" information. Experimental protocols are included for this purpose. The chapter is designed to be useful for novices in IEF and at the same time provide experienced users many useful tips and insights.

6

D.E. GARFIN AND S.AHUJA

VI. TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS (2-DE)

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis is a bioanalytical technique that provides high-resolution protein separation by integrating two independent electrophoretic separation methods. The first dimension employs the charge-based technique of isoelectric focusing, while the second step consists of size-based separation using SDS-PAGE. As a technique with wide utility, this method remains unsurpassed to date in its capacity to resolve polypeptides (see Chapter 6). It is the orthogonal separation that provides such high resolving power. The high resolving capacity of 2-DE makes it a very desirable technique for proteomic analyses that aim to study thousands of proteins in a given sample. This chapter explains how to prepare proteins separated in the IEF gel for transfer to the second dimension and provides details of the 2-DE analysis. The technique is ideal for qualitative cataloging of the different protein "species" of a biological sample, and it is particularly useful for separating post-translationally modified protein isoforms. Moreover, 2-DE is well suited for quantitative studies of fluxes in protein synthesis and protein abundance. Proteins purified by 2-DE are readily accessible for analytical characterization conducted by mass spectrometry (MS). With the increasinganalytical sensitivity afforded by MS (low fmol) and the decoding of several genomes, many of the proteins visualized on 2-D gels can be identified. VII. PRACTICES AND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

The key to successful performance of IEF and, by extension, successful 2-DE lies in sample preparation (see Chapter 7). Since protein mixtures vary widely in their properties, no single sample preparation procedure is universally applicable for all samples. Classical sample preparation for IEF relies on non-ionic or zwitterionic reagents to disrupt protein complexes and denature proteins to ensure that the subsequent electrophoretic separations are carried out on polypeptide monomers. Since IEF separates proteins based on isoelectric point, the single most powerful solubilizing reagent, SDS, is not normally usable, as it strongly attaches to proteins and often causes anomalous focusing and horizontal streaking in lEE To approximate the denaturing power of boiling SDS under reducing conditions, IEF practitioners have relied on various cocktails of chaotropes, surfactants, and reducing agents. Chaotropes (such as urea, most commonly used for IEF) disrupt the hydrogen bonding at the protein surface and cause partial unfolding. When hydrogen in water bonds to the chaotropes instead of protein, the folded protein is more likely to open up and expose the (hydrophobic) interior. After the hydrophobic interior of the protein is exposed, the solubility is often

I

OVERVIEW

7

compromised in aqueous solution. Therefore, it is desirable to have at least one surfactant present in the IEF cocktail to help solubilize the hydrophobic residues that are exposed as a result of denaturation in chaotropes. Many important considerations in sample preparation are also discussed. The aim of the work presented in this chapter is routine creation of high-resolution, streak-free IEF and 2-DE gels. This entails not only means for solubilizing proteins and keeping them soluble during IEF, but in the case of 2-DE, facilitates transfer of proteins from the first gel to the second gel. VIII. PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING

Gel-based IEF has a strong worldwide user base that supports a commercial pipeline of instrumentation as well as consumable products and will thus certainly remain a relatively low-cost, routine laboratory technique in the coming years. Detection methods used for visualizing proteins in IEF gels are described in Chapter 8. These techniques involve the use of many of the same dyes and stains that were developed for polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels but have been adapted for use with IEF gels. Modifications to accustomed procedures are necessary because most of the stains interact slightly with carrier ampholytes in IEF gels and to a lesser extent with the amine and carboxyl functionalities in the gel matrix of immobilized pH gradients. The important topics of image acquisition and analysis are also covered in this chapter. IX. CAPILLARY IEF

Capillary IEF couples the automation capabilities of instrumental techniques with the high resolving capabilities of IEE IEF in the capillary format (see Chapter 9) provides the high resolving power of conventional gel IEF and the automation capabilities of instrumental techniques such as capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The principle of capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) is similar to that of gel IEF: proteins migrate within a stable pH gradient formed by carrier ampholytes under the influence of an electric field. Upon attainment of equilibrium, proteins become focused within the pH gradient at the points where they have zero net charge, i.e., their isoelectric points (pI). Any diffusion of the focused protein away from its isoelectric zone will result in acquisition of charge, resulting in backmigration to the zone. The use of a narrow-bore fused silica capillary as the separation chamber provides efficient dissipation of Joule heat, enabling the use of very high electric fields (typically several hundred to a thousand V/cm). This allows separations to be performed in free

8

D.E. GARFIN AND S.AHUJA

solution, without the requirement for a gel as an anticonvective medium. The application of high field strengths provides high resolution (typically 0.02 pI units) and rapid analysis times. All steps in the analysis, including introduction of sample and ampholytes, focusing, and protein detection, can be performed automatically under instrument control, and the capillary can be reused for several hundred analyses. The ability to automate the IEF process and obtain quantitative information on resolved proteins is a driving force for the replacement of gel IEF by cIEF, particularly in industrial settings. All steps in the analysis can be carried out under instrument control, enabling the high-throughput applications desirable in industrial settings. Various relevant techniques of capillary IEF, along with discussions of their advantages and disadvantages, are presented in this chapter. Several pertinent applications of capillary IEF are also discussed.

~. PREPARATIVEIEF IEF is well suited to preparative applications, and several different embodiments of preparative IEF devices have been developed. Methods for preparative IEF are described in several chapters. Preparative techniques range from simple slurries of gel-chromatography beads to specialized electrophoresis chambers. The pH gradients in preparative instruments are generated either by carrier ampholytes or by specialized applications of acrylamido buffer technology. Recovery of separated proteins from gel slurries is done by scraping out selected bands from the slurries, whereas recovery of proteins from the chambers is through access ports. Proteins obtained through preparative IEF can be quite pure and available for various other purposes. However, preparative IEF is most often used as part of a purification scheme, often upstream of other techniques. Nevertheless, as a consequence of the high sensitivity of analytical instruments such as mass spectrometers, applications of capillary IEF, which generates low quantities of proteins, can in some sense be considered preparative. Preparative IEF has also gained interest in the preliminary fractionation (the so-called prefractionation) of protein mixtures prior to 2-DE, both to decrease the complexity of the mixtures and to increase the accessibility of low abundance proteins.

A. Free-Flow IEF Free-flow electrophoresis (FFE), also known as continuous flee-film electrophoresis or continuous-flow electrophoresis (CFE), is one of the most versatile preparative-scale fractionation and separation techniques available to scientists of various disciplines (see Chapter 10). FFE utilizes

I

9

OVERVIEW

a thin film of separation buffer that flows continuously in a laminar fashion between two closely spaced plates and an electric field that is applied perpendicular to the flow. FFE results in a differential deflection of charged sample components as they move toward the collection ports. This allows the high-throughput separation of all types of samples, such as low-molecular-weight organic compounds, peptides, proteins, protein complexes, membranes, organelles, and whole cells. FFE supports all modes of electrophoresis, such as zone electrophoresis (ZE), field-step electrophoresis (FSE), isotachophoresis (ITP), and IEE In this chapter, the focus is on FF-IEF; it provides the reader with a comprehensive overview of its principles--covering all relevant parameters, the historical development, state of the art, and future instrumentation as well as the most recent applications. Wherever appropriate, general information about FFE has been included for completeness. Furthermore, the chapter touches on related technologies, such as multicompartment electrolyzers (MCE), to allow their proper differentiation. Preparative separations are further discussed in Chapters 12 under the heading of Chromatofocusing. XI. IEF AND PROTEOMICS

While proteomics has many broad definitions, the simplest may refer to scale (see Chapter 11). For the benefit of this chapter, proteomics has been defined as an ability to conduct high-throughput biochemistry or protein chemistry on a scale comparable with that achieved by molecular biology and its high-throughput counterpart, genomics. The advent of proteomics in the mid-1990s was made possible through a number of technical advancements for separating and identifying proteins, not the least of which was the sensitivity and automation capability of various MS technologies. However, all of the original techniques for separation of single unique proteins among the complex mixtures relied on IEF as a preliminary step, especially in 2-DE applications. In the 10-year period since the coining of the term proteome, IEF has become more than simply a tool utilized in 2-DE; in fact, it is now a recognized linchpin in the proteomics process. Researchers have begun to understand the value in high-resolution prefractionation steps to examine fractions with particular qualities, such as subcellular localization, prior to either 2-DE or 2-D liquid chromatography (2-DLC) for protein and peptide separation. IEF plays a central role prior to either of these applications, for example, in the separation and purification of organelles, the enrichment of high and low molecular mass, alkaline or hydrophobic proteins, or one of the several prefractionating devices used to enrich for proteins within a given pH range and compatible with micro-range (single pH unit) 2-D gels. This chapter deals with the proteomics aspects of IEF, with a focus on its

I0

D.E. GARFIN AND S.AHUJA

role in prefractionation of biological samples and as the preliminary step in 2-DE, and an emphasis on reviewing the most recent developments. It cannot be overemphasized that IEF remains an integral part of proteome analysis. It is central to the most commonly performed protein separation technique utilized in proteomics (2-DE), and in recent times it has become essential for protein prefractionation prior to 2-DE or other separation techniques. As such, it is a crucial element in allowing proteomics to access more than just the most abundant and readily solubilized proteins, and hence is a prerequisite for proteomic deep drilling of even the simplest of organisms. The role of IEF in 2-D gel-based proteomics is addressed in this chapter. Discussion covers the pros and cons of 2-DE proteomics, including the well-known underrepresentation of hydrophobic or membrane-associated proteins, highly alkaline proteins, high- and low-molecular weight proteins, and lower abundance proteins in relation to high abundance "housekeeping" proteins. Several methods based on IEF that are designed to overcome these problems are discussed in this chapter, including preliminary fractionation by IEF and modifications to the standard first-dimension IEF procedures. The final two chapters diverge from description of purely IEF methods in order to highlight related, alternative approaches. XII. CHROMATOFOCUSING

Chromatofocusing is a technique developed by Sluyterman and coworkers in 1978, predated by closely related work in ampholytedisplacement chromatography (see Chapter 12). The technique employs ion-exchange chromatography using a pH gradient (usually linear) to separate biomolecules with acid-base functionalities. It is principally used in the analysis and purification of proteins. Chromatofocusing was developed with the hope of making it a liquid chromatographic version of IEF, which performs separation and characterization based on the pI values of the protein. A third feature of IEF is the technique's high resolution, stemming from its ability to focus protein bands. While chromatofocusing generally separates proteins based on pI and focuses the protein bands better than salt gradient ion-exchange chromatography techniques, it does not realize the capabilities of IEF in terms of accurately determining pI or in achieving the same resolution. However, this chromatographic technique of pI separations is very useful as an analytical and preparative tool in the analysis and purification of proteins. Although chromatofocusing is a chromatographic technique rather than an electrophoretic one, at the very basic level its similarities to IEF are evident. It is a chromatographic form of pI separation. To understand chromatofocusing, it is necessary to reorient the thought processes from electrophoretic to chromatographic concepts and terminology. As in IEF,

I

OVERVIEW

II

the separation of proteins in chromatofocusing is based on the pI values of proteins. Differences in pI values are exploited to elute and recover proteins from complex mixtures. Development of pH gradients in chromatofocusing is not a steady-state process as in IEF, but a dynamic process in which pH is continually changing in the column. Moreover, there is only one direction of flow in chromatofocusing, from the top to the bottom of the column. In chromatofocusing, proteins are first bound to ion-exchange columns, either anion-exchanger columns or cation exchangers, and then they are serially eluted by means of pH gradients generated internally or externally to the ion-exchange column. When the pH of the eluent reaches the pI of a particular protein, the protein becomes uncharged and dislodges from the ion-exchange matrix and moves into the mobile phase, eventually eluting from the bottom of the column. This chapter discusses mainly anion-exchange chromatofocusing; however but the concepts hold equally well in the cation-exchange mode. Chromatofocusing is more of a preparative method than an analytical one, since the pI values obtained are only approximate. As a result, it is most often used as part of a protein purification scheme. An added advantage of this method is that it can be automated. XIII. ALTERNATE ELECTROFOCUSING METHODS

Separation scientists classify IEF as one of the set of techniques termed equilibrium gradient methods. Chapter 13 considers IEF in this context and describes a set of related equilibrium gradient methods. In contrast to IEF, the set of described alternative methods are in the conceptual or very early development phase. They point to some of the possible routes that separation technology can undergo in the search for efficient techniques for fractionating and purifying proteins. This chapter provides the necessary mathematical background to clarify the basic concepts. The verbal descriptions of the methods have also been provided to help the readers comprehend the techniques that are presented and to encourage them to explore these methods further. Alternative electrofocusing methods (AFMs) differ from IEF in that they do not focus solutes at their isoelectric points (pI). The AFMs analyzed in this chapter are part of a subset of the equilibrium gradient methods described by Giddings and Dahlgren, which use an applied electric field or electric field gradient as at least one of the counterbalanced forces on a focused solute. A complete binary set of EGMs would consist of dozens of pairs of forces, some of which are mentioned by Giddings in the context of field-flow fractionation (FFF) as well as in myriad variations on isocratic and gradient-elution chromatographies, each paired against a force, for example, hydrodynamic. It is unlikely that all possible binary pairs have been discovered, much less exploited,

12

D.E. GARFIN AND S. AHUJA

at this time. It does not appear that any ternary EGMs have been reported in the literature to date, so this area may still be considered "immature" and therefore ready for further development. The objective of this chapter is to describe what is known about this emerging set of methods in the hope that "gadgeteers" and theorists will explore this frontier and in doing so will help scientists to develop new tools for systems biology. XIV. SUMMARY

In general, the concepts and manipulations of IEF remain virtually as they were in the early stages of its development. Advances in IEF have been mainly along the lines of refinements in reagents, techniques, and numerical analyses. The foundation technology of IEF gel electrophoresis, rather than simply withering away, actually appears to be undergoing a rebirth of sorts in the miniaturized world of IEF chips and microfluidic devices. It is believed that excellent technical contributions in this book will help protein biochemists to fully appreciate and utilize the powerful technique, that is IEF, in the quest to understand proteomes and beyond.

REFERENCES 1. Ahuja, S. Handbook of Bioseparations, Academic, NY, 2000. 2. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric Focusing: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983. 3. Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH Gradients: Theory and Methodology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990. 4. Righetti, P. G., Stoyanov, A. and Zhukov, M. The Proteome Revisited: Theory and Practice of All Relevant Electrophoretic Steps, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001. 5. Sadana, A. Bioseparation of Proteins, Academic, NY, 1998.

2

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AKOS VF:GVARI A N D FERENC KII.AR

Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Institute of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Medicine, Universityof P~cs,P&s, Hungary

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI.

INTRODUCTION THE RISE OF ELECTROPHORESIS KOLIN'S "ISOELECTRIC SPECTRA"--THE ARTIFICIAL pH GRADIENT SVENSSON'S IEF--VESTERBERG'S SYNTHESIS PROGRESS IN PREPARATIVEAND ANALYTICAL IEF THE IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS AND BLOTTING OF PROTEINS CAPILLARY IEF SPECIAL FEATURES IN THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF IEF REVIEWS ON IEF CONCLUDING REMARKS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION Isoelectric focusing (IEF) has had a long evolutionary process. The development of this technique was based on several original ideas and needed tremendous work. This chapter summarizes the progression of events that led to successful preparative and analytical applications of isoelectric focusing from the earliest "electrophoretic knowledge" until the modern theoretical advances. II. THE RISE OF ELECTROPHORESIS A worthwhile prelude to the evolution of successful IEF is a tracing of the history or electrophoresis in general. "Electrophoresis" has a long history, which probably starts as early as 600 B.C. in ancient Greece. 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

13

14

~,.VEGV/~RIANO F. KItAR

Although there is no written record from that time, we know, as A. Kolin~a pioneer of the technique~pointed out in his lecture about "Evolution of Ideas in Electrophoretic Developments", 1 that Thales of Miletus~generally considered to be the father of Greek science~had known the special properties of amber ("electron" in ancient Greek). When amber is rubbed, it attracts small light objects, such as pieces of straw and then it repels them after contact. Thales might also have observed the attraction of oppositely charged dust particles toward and repulsion of particles of like charge from an electrified piece of amber by positioning the amber in a light beam in a dark room and viewing it sideways. The phenomenon can be considered as electrophoresis in air! Unfortunately, the ancient knowledge disappeared from Europe (and rest of the world) for many centuries, and electrophoresis in liquids was discovered only after the invention of the Voltaic battery in 18002 that provided an electrochemical energy source. A mere 9 years after Volta's historic publication, Reuss, a professor in physics at the University of Moscow, who was studying electrical conductivity of moist soil in a garden on the shores of the Moskva River, discovered electrophoresis. 3 This was at a time when the nature of electric current was mysterious~people spoke of an "electric effluvium." Ohm's law was discovered 28 years later and Faraday's laws of electrolysis after 32 years. In these early days, the intensity of electric currents was semiquantitatively estimated by observing the rate of evolution of bubbles in an acidic solution. Physicists' attention eventually turned to electrical conduction and they intensively investigated all kinds of conductive medium. Reuss' electric battery was a Voltaic pile consisting of a multiple-layer sandwich of 92 silver rubel coins separated from 92 zinc discs by layers of acidic-soaked cloth. Reuss was surprised that the distance between his electrodes in the soil did not significantly affect the current. He set up a simple apparatus in the laboratory and repeated his experiments under better controlled conditions. Instead of soil the test apparatus contained a layer of quartz sand. In his first experiment Reuss discovered electroosmosis as a rise of liquid in the positive electrode leg. There was no effect in the absence of the sand. He reported it on April 15, 1809 in a lecture entitled "On a New Effect of Galvanic Electricity." In the second experiment, Reuss replaced the sand with clay particles and inserted two vertical glass tubes into a slab of wet clay (Figure 1). He thus discovered electrophoresis by observing that clay particles migrated upward in the tube filled with conductive solution at the positive pole. Physicists (but not yet analytical chemists) continued the investigations some decades later by developing the theory of electrophoresis. Helmholtz' (the co-discoverer of the law of conservation of energy) famous mathematical formulation of electrophoresis 4 was followed by a common theory for electrophoresis and electroendosmosis based on the notion of an interfacial electric double layer, s This idea formed the basis

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

J5

F I G U R E I Reuss' experimental setup of electrophoresis. C is the moist clay slab; T~ and T 2 are glass tubes.

of a more sophisticated theory of the diffuse ionic atmosphere in the subsequent treatments of Gouy in 1910, Chapman in 1913, and Stern (a Nobel Laureate in physics "for his contribution to the development of the molecular ray method and his discovery of the magnetic moment of the proton" in 1943) in 1924. 6-8 The theories originally designed for plane surfaces were extended to spherical configurations by the introduction of the theory of counter-ion atmosphere and ionic migration by Debye (a Nobel Laureate in chemistry "for his contributions to our knowledge of molecular structure through his investigations on dipole moments and on the diffraction of X-rays and electrons in gases" in 1936) and Hiickel in 1923. 9 We also have to mention Arrhenius' (a Nobel Laureate in chemistry "in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered to the advancement of chemistry by his electrolytic theory of dissociation" in 1903) revolutionary theory of ionic dissociation, which assumed that supposedly immutable atoms radically change their chemical properties by acquisition of an electric charge in becoming ions. 1~ Experimental work complemented the theoretical developments. Kohlrausch's~a notable pioneer in the study of electrolyte conductance~ discovery of the laws for concentration shifts and boundary migration in electrolyte columns provided a foundation for some of the most important recent developments in electrophoretic methodology, aa Lodge, in 1886, proposed the moving-boundary method and zone electrophoresis in gels in his studies on direct observation and measurement of migration rates of ions in solution. 12 Tiselius (Figure 2 ) ~ a Nobel Laureate in chemistry "for his research on electrophoresis and adsorption analysis, especially

16

A.VEGVARI ANO F. KI~R

FIGURE

2

ArneTiselius.

for his discoveries concerning the complex nature of the serum proteins" in 1948~has perfected the former electrophoretic method for analytical use in 1930.13 Early experiments were carried out on hemoglobin, TM but the potential of electrophoresis as a tool in biochemical investigations was not realized before Tiselius developed his method. With the advent of Tiselius' apparatus (Figure 3), boundaries formed by electrophoretically migrating proteins in buffer solutions could be recorded optically by measurements of light absorption or refractive index. This analytical device, in which the sample ions are subjected to electrophoresis in free buffer (i.e., without an anticonvection medium), was supplemented by the introduction of paper electrophoresis in the late 1940s. ~5 The advantages of simplicity in technique and completeness of zonal separations on filter paper were gained at the expense of the emergence

2

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

FIGURE 3

|7

The electrophoresis apparatus from 1930 invented byArneTiselius.

of new artefacts. Pronounced electroosmosis and streaming caused by evaporation of water as well as non-uniformity of buffer concentration and temperature along the paper strip, made filter-paper electrophoresis unreliable means for measurement of electrophoretic mobilities for the characterization of compounds. Adsorptive interaction between filter paper and some compounds caused not only retardation and possibly immobilization of some zones, but also "tailing" which broadened zones and degraded the separation pattern. This led to replacement of paper by other materials, such as cellulose acetate in which some of these problems are less severe. The use of a thin supporting matrix provides, however, one major advantage over filter-paper methods: the possibility of cooling the strip. This permits high degrees of separation by means of "high-voltage electrophoresis. ''16 The search for materials, in which the above-mentioned artefacts were less pronounced than in paper or in thin plastic films, led to the discovery of many different types of gels with suitable properties, most notably polyacrylamide gel (originated by Lodge12). The transition from a paper- or thin-film matrix to a gel had an important advantage of adding a significant third dimension, which permitted an increase in the sample quantity for preparative separations. But the gel layer can also be made very thin so as to permit cooling and application of high potential gradients to achieve rapid separations. There is one property of gels that can be utilized concurrently with electrophoresis, which makes them superior to other matrices: the possibility of superimposing a molecular sieving effect upon electrophoresis, thus adding the capability of resolution on the basis of differences

18

A.VEGVARIAND F.KILAR in molecular dimensions. Smithies was the first to introduce such a medium, 17 a starch gel, which, unfortunately, had a low but not negligible content of charged groups which caused some adsorption of proteins and gave rise to an electroendosmotic flow. It was also difficult to manufacture starch batches with reproducible properties. The starch gel was soon replaced by polyacrylamide gels, independently by Raymond and Weintraub, 18 Davis and Orstein, 19 and Hjert~n. 2~ With polyacrylamide as a nearly ideal anticonvection medium, the resolving power of electrophoresis was increased, diffusion was reduced, and migration of the sample components in sharp zones was enabled. Hjert6n showed that gels of neutral agarose 21 are superior to charged agar gels (which contain sulfate groups) for electrophoresis and that they possess much larger pores than polyacrylamide gels.

Iil. KOLIN'S "ISOELECTRIC SPECTRA"--THE ARTIFICIAL pH GRADIENT Probably the first IEF experiments date to 1912 when Ikeda and Suzuki 22 achieved a separation of amino acids from plant protein hydrolysates in a three-chambered electrolysis cell. They noticed that the amino acids tended to arrange themselves according to increasing isoelectric point (pI) between the anode and cathode. In doing so, the separated amino acids formed a pH gradient between the electrodes. In 1929, Williams and Waterman 23 extended this work by designing a multichamber compartment, which gave better resolution by reducing diffusion and convective disturbances. Although variable field strengths between the electrodes prevented the formation of stable pH gradients, limiting practical applications, these and other uses of the principle of IEF provided useful separation of peptides and proteins. 24 One of the major obstacles in these pioneer experiments was the lack of suitable ampholytes for the development of smooth pH gradients that were also sufficiently stable to allow true equilibrium focusing. Fortunately, these problems were solved, largely through the efforts of three chemists: Kolin, Svensson (later called Rilbe), and Vesterberg. IEF, as a concept, was initiated by Kolin (Figure 4) with his short note on the use of pH and density gradients for creation of "isoelectric line spectra." This idea of "focusing ions in a continuous pH gradient," stabilized by a sucrose density gradient, was presented in 1954. 2s Kolin described the separation and concentration of proteins by electrical transport in a pH gradient. The components of a given mixture are separated from each other simultaneously and are sorted in a spatial arrangement, hence referred as an "electrophoretic spectrum." The term "spectrum" was used to designate a sorting in the same sense in which one speaks of "mass spectra" or "frequency spectra." Kolin considered two kinds of electrophoretic line spectra: (i) "mobility spectra" and

2

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

FIGURE

4

J9

Alexander Kolin.

(ii) "isoelectric spectra." In the first kind of spectrum, the components are separated according to their differences in electrophoretic mobility, whereas in the second kind of spectrum the components are separated according to differences in their isoelectric points. Naturally, both types of spectra may be occasionally superimposed upon each other (Kolin suggested the use of the term "electrophoretic line spectra" in such cases). Kolin placed the substances to be separated at the interface between an acidic and a basic buffer in a Tiselius-like apparatus and after an appropriate diffusion time, applied an electric field. This generated a pH gradient, later to be called an "artificial" pH gradient by Svensson upon his invention of "natural" pH gradients (see below). Kolin was able to obtain "isoelectric line spectra" of dyes, proteins, cells, microorganisms, and viruses on a time scale ranging from 40 s up to a few minutes; rapidity still unmatched in the field of electrophoresis. Concomitant with the pH gradient, a density gradient, an electrical conductivity gradient and a vertical temperature gradient were acting upon Kolin's separation cell.

20

A.VEGVARIANO

F. tatAR

Kolin's initial paper was followed by a long series of papers showing his quite prolific innovative ability, z6-28,1 Kolin pointed out the importance of using electrolytes with high buffering capacity and stabilizing the pH gradient against convective mixing, zs,z6 His approach consisted of two steps: (i) the generation of a pH gradient along the separation path by diffusion between two limiting solutions, which were titrated to the starting and ending pH values, followed by (ii) a quick electrokinetic separation. The substances to be separated were placed at the interface of an acidic and a basic buffer, which were allowed to diffuse against one another while subjected to an electric field. The separation force in these experiments was, therefore, the resultant of several factors: a pH gradient, a density gradient, an electrical conductivity gradient, and a vertical temperature gradient. Unfortunately, the pH gradients were unstable because of the rapid migration of the buffers during electrolysis, and the separated components could not be easily recovered. Kolin described the three related effects of IEF during the course of separation that play important roles: (i) "Isoelectric condensation", in which amphoteric molecules are swept toward their isoelectric zones where their charges and accumulate. (ii) "Isoelectric evacuation", wherein oppositely charged, non-isoelectric ions located on either side of the isoelectric zone move away from this zone, to create a "protein ion vacuum" on each side of it. Protein molecules removed from the isoelectric zone are swept away by the electric field. (iii) The isoelectric condensation zones must exhibit electrochemical stability. Molecules removed mechanically or thermally from such a zone acquire a charge in the pH gradient and, thus forced to be returned to the isoelectric zone. A similar principle, called electrophoretic focusing of ions (EFI) (focusing ion exchange) was reported by Friedli and Schumacher z9 for separation of rare-earth mixtures in combined proton (pH) and ligand (pL) gradients. EFI spectra of La-Tb and Eu-Lu groups were obtained in the course of 5 min. However, not exactly focusing, but electrophoresis perpendicular to a pre-established pH gradient was practiced already in 1952 by Michl3~ it was an embryonic form of "titration (pH/mobility) curves," as later developed utilizing IEF in the first dimension. 31 pH gradients generated by diffusion were also used by Stah132,33 for obtaining "titration curves" in thin-layer chromatography (pH/Rf curves) and later by Tate 34 in paper electrophoresis (determination of ionization constants of nucleotides); they were also used by Jokl et al. 3s in hydro-organic solvents. Jokl observed that the "isoelectric lines" of proteins were much sharper and more stable than those of non-proteins~a general attractive property of IEE However, he assumed that this sharpness is due to the stable equilibrium of protein molecules in the isoelectric plane. He then clearly explained what happens when a molecule (ampholyte) gains charge by migrating from the focused zone in the electric field (i.e., the "isoelectric evacuation" effect).

2

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

2J

Early analytical biochemists designed an "electrodialysis apparatus" with compartments separated by membranes and containing buffers of different pH values. 23,36 The apparatus consisted of 14 compartments filled with ampholytes in solutions of different pH values separated by parchment membranes. After 60 h, the highest concentration of individual species of ampholytes was found in compartments having pH values nearest to their respective isoelectric points. Some later modifications of this apparatus used separate containers connected in series by electrolyte bridges. This method may be considered as an intermediate step between standard electrophoretic technique and the method of "isoelectric spectra." But, in spite of the time lapse since 1929, no successful attempts were made to turn from a pH step-function to a continuous pH gradient. Interestingly, Kolin also described in his first paper how to concentrate components of a broad starting zone by the difference between the conductivities in the zone and the following electrolyte (when the conductivity is higher in the latter one). This phenomenon is frequently utilized today in capillary and microchip electrophoresis experiments when analyses of very low concentrations of proteins require pre-concentration in order to detect them. It is difficult to understand as to why no instrument factory has taken up any of Kolin's ideas and constructions for separation and analysis of macromolecules and cells. However, the International Electrophoresis Society honored him (and Rilbe) with its first "Award for Outstanding Contributions to the Field" in the year 1981. IV. SVENSSON'S IEF---VESTERBERG'S SYNTHESIS

The pH gradients used by Kolin were very short and unstable with time. This strengthened the desire of Svensson (Figure 5) to develop a new IEF method. In 1956 he published a paper on the concept of transport numbers of ampholytes. 37 The achievement of pH gradients of adequate stability and durability was a decisive contribution of Svensson and Vesterberg. 38-41 Svensson (who in 1968 changed his name to Rilbe) published the basic theory of IEF 38 and, in a later paper, 39 experimentally verified that pure ampholytes had conductivities in agreement with theoretical predictions. Isoelectric ampholytes with zero net charge were found to have appreciable conductance if the pK values of the dissociating groups were close. If many such ampholytes, isoelectric at various pH values, were available, then on electrolysis they would be able to dictate, from the anode to the cathode, a smooth pH course without any deep conductivity minima. This was the very basic concept of IEF, and the desirable ampholytes were later called carrier ampholytes (short for "amphoteric electrolytes"). The separation of haemoglobins was also described. 4~ However, the lack of sufficient number of suitable ampholyte molecules delayed the

22

A. VEGV,~RI AND F. KII~R

FIGURE 5

Harry Svensson.

process of development. The real breakthrough for the scientific world arrived when Vesterberg (Figure 6), a medical student at the Karolinska Institute, joined Svensson's research group and started to work on synthesis of new ampholytes. Righetti begins his excellent monograph 42 by writing in the preface about the difficulties Svensson had to face: not only scientific problems but also human frailties. As Righetti narrates, the "story" of ampholytes goes as follows: "In 1959 Svensson was on a visit to Pauling in California Institute of Technology. He was already outlining the basic theory of IEF but was frustrated to find that even in the United States, the chemical catalogues listed no suitable ampholytes. After his return to Sweden, as a freelance at the Karolinska Institute (note that professorships were just as hard to come by then as now), Svensson teamed with Vesterberg (a medical student) to solve the practical aspects of the problem. After 3 years of

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

FIGURE 6

23

OlofAIfred YngveVesterberg.

slow progress, Svensson became a Professor at Gothenburg and the IEF team broke up. Vesterberg continued with the problem in Stockholm and, in the spring of 1964, Svensson received a call from an excited Vesterberg, who appeared to have devised a satisfactory synthesis of carrier ampholytes. After careful checking of the data, Svensson and Vesterberg were convinced that a breakthrough had been achieved and they approached LKB Produkter with a proposal for commercial production. At that time, Uppsala was the Mecca of separation techniques, hence the two pilgrims from LKB were sent to consult the high priest of electrophoresis, Professor Tiselius. They were disconcerted to be told that an electrophoretic separation technique in which macromolecules would be driven to their isoelectric points could never work as the macroions would aggregate and precipitate. After such a discouraging verdict the credit for faith and persistence goes to H. Haglund (a former pupil of Tiselius like Svensson), who was head of a small team at LKB involved in separation techniques. Knowing of the Svensson-Vesterberg experiments and the discouraging assessment of the 'master', Haglund with his colleagues Holmstr6m and Davies decided to try to market the 'gimmick.' They successfully squeezed from a reluctant LKB a bare 60,000 SKr, and went into production making Svensson's vertical density gradient columns and the first batches of Vesterberg's carrier ampholytes. These were offered on a free trial basis to the scientific community."

24

A.VECVARIAND F.K~tAR Vesterberg's elegant approach to the synthesis of carrier ampholytes 41,43 has enabled today's IEE He filed a Swedish patent in August 26, 1964, which was extended in the English version (U.S. patent no. 3,485,736; December 23, 1969). In his summarizing paper about the history of electrophoretic methods, 44 Vesterberg himself recalls the struggle in seeking indefatigably for useful carrier ampholytes, his synthetic approaches that at first were all failures and, finally, the "Eureka" solution: "At the Karolinska Institute, Svensson formed a research group, which I had the opportunity to join. The search to find suitable carrier ampholytes had high priority. In spite of scrutinizing catalogues of commercially available chemicals, only a few suitable materials could be found. It was especially difficult to find carrier ampholytes with isoelectric points in the pH range 4-8. Nor did we receive any help from organic chemists; a typical reply was, 'to get the many substances needed would constitute a huge task.' By partial hydrolysis of haemoglobin or whole blood we kept producing oligopeptides that were used as carrier ampholytes. This "bucket-scale" work, a laborious task, delayed us from extending IEF to new fields, e.g., focusing in gels. Despite treatment with carbon and other sorbents, we could not obtain colorless peptide preparations. However, IEF showed that the color could be focused in a few discrete zones. In 1963 Svensson left for a Professorship in Gothenburg and I obtained some laboratory space at the Karolinska Institute in Professor Theorell's laboratories at the Nobel Medical Institute. It was very annoying that the peptides that I used as carrier ampholytes gave zones of similar color to myoglobins, which I studied. This promoted a search for uncolored synthetic ampholytes with suitable buffer capacity and conductance. From my chemistry studies I had memorized the fact that owing to mutual influences within a molecule, identical protolytic groups in polyvalent acids and bases may have widely different pK values. I made an extensive study of possible synthetic methods for amino acids. At first I was disappointed because the methods found were unsuitable for some reason. Finally, in 1964, I tried to attach carboxylic acids to amines. By boiling under reflux a mixture of acrylic acid and polyvalent amines I obtained ampholytes with many protolytic groups having suitable pK values and isoelectric points. The first syntheses were encouraging. I worked very hard and developed modified recipes giving improved properties of the carrier ampholytes, which finally fulfilled all the desired criteria." His historical notes on the results are shown in Figure 7. Vesterberg's synthetic procedure is basically as follows a mixture of oligoamines (the more heterogeneous the better, e.g., triethylene triamine, tetraethylene pentamine, pentaethylene hexamine) is reacted with an ce-/3 unsaturated compound (the best being acrylic acid) to form a highly complex mixture of aliphatic oligo-amino and oligo-carboxylic acids. These have pI values in the pH range 3-10, with small (pI-pH proximal) values and are thus able to buffer and conduct in this pH

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENTOF ISOELECTRICFOCUSING

25

F I G U R E 7 "Eureka," in the laboratory notes of Vesterberg when the synthesis successfully created a pH gradient of ampholytes.

region. Although, it was never clearly stated in the literature, it is obvious that LKB's commercial Ampholines are indeed the carrier ampholytes first devised and patented by Vesterberg. According to the patent, they are "polyprotic amino carboxylic acids, containing at least

26

A.v~cv~,R~ ANO F. KaL~R

four weak protolytic groups, at least one being a carboxyl group and one a basic nitrogen atom, but no peptide bonds". The advantages of these carrier ampholytes were obvious: upon being focused in density gradients of sucrose, two myoglobins could be separated although the difference in their isoelectric points (ApI) was only 0.05 pH unit. To resolve them, it was necessary to create a very shallow pH course. The resolving power was thus better than 0.05 pH unit, whereas a theoretical resolving power of 0.02 was calculated. 4s Vesterberg has also designed and built apparatus for fractionation of the synthetic products and also columns for IEF and separation of proteins in density gradients. 46 V. PROGRESS IN PREPARATIVEAND ANALYTICAL IEF One should notice that IEF was born as a preparative technique run in vertical glass tubes. Rilbe and his collaborators designed apparatus for rapid and convenient preparation and focusing in short density gradients. 47 Jonsson and Rilbe developed a method for IEF, which permitted the convenient spectrophotometric evaluation of the separation 48 that was continued by Fredriksson. 49 Procedures for the preparative purification of proteins have also been described s~ and focusing in granulated gels (such as Sephadex TM)can also be mentioned, sl Over the years, several synthetic approaches for ampholytes generation have been described, even high molecular weight species for fractionation of peptides, but all have been based on the classical synthetic approach of Vesterberg. Serva introduced another synthesis (their ampholytes are called ServalyteTM), which has been described by Pogacar and Jarecki s2 and by Grubhofer and Borja. s3 A new generation of buffering ampholytes was introduced by Pharmacia under the trade name of PharmalyteVM.s4,ss However, all these three follow the basic idea of Vesterberg: the synthesis of amphoteric compounds from polyamines and organic/inorganic acids in a way to obtain the most heterogeneous mixture of products. Over the years other laboratory synthesis methods saw the light of day as weU.s6-6~ A radically different approach to the generation of pH gradients, which does not rely on carrier ampholytes or on prolonged electrolysis, is to take advantage of the temperature coefficient of the pH of a buffer as well as of the pI of the proteins to be separated. 61,62A pH gradient can be established in a buffer solution within seconds by taking advantage of the temperature dependence of the pK value. By establishing a temperature gradient within the buffer, pH gradients can be obtained that span a pH range of about 1 pH unit. Troitzki et al. 63 formed pH gradients by using common buffers in gradients of organic solvents, such as ethanol, dioxane, glycerol, or in polyol gradients such as mannitol, sucrose, and sorbitol. Taking advantage of the pH variations of these buffers in different concentrations of

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

27

these solvents, they were able to generate gradients of approximately 1.5 pH units in different regions of the pH scale. These pH gradients were stable up to 12 days of IEF under voltages up to 1000 V. Thousands of laboratories have been benefited from the use of horizontally run flat-bed gels for various types of electrophoresis, especially IEF, using equipment and apparatus developed by Vesterberg 64,6s and by others, such as Multiphor TM (since 1973) and Ultraphor TM, which were originally marketed by LKB and later by Pharmacia. IEF in ultrathin polyacrylamide layers, as developed by G6rg et al., 66 represents one of the most interesting breakthroughs in polyacrylamide gel slab lEE The two major forms of analytical IEF are two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and capillary lEE Since both are described in separate chapters in this book only the developmental phases of the techniques are mentioned here. In the 1960s, Hjert6n (Figure 8) developed the first

FIGURE 8

Stellan Hjert~n.

28

A.VEGVAR~ANO F. K~LAR

FIGURE 9

The setup of the"Free zone electrophoresis" apparatus of Hjert~n. 67

"capillary electrophoresis apparatus," the Free-zone electrophoresis in a rotating tube (Figure 9). 67 Lundahl and Hjert~n 62 and Hjert~n 68 modified this apparatus for use in IEE Coating of the tube with methyl cellulose eliminates electroosmosis. The tube is scanned in UV light and the ratio of absorbances at 320 and 280 nm is recorded. At the two tube extremities, polyacrylamide beads are packed to avoid convective mixing of anolyte and catholyte with the Ampholine TM solution in the tube. A cellophane membrane at the tube ends prevents hydrodynamic liquid streaming.

Vl. THE IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS The latest evolutionary step in the development of IEF was the immobilized pH gradients (IPG) containing buffering substances covalently bound to the gel matrix, which provides for indefinitely stable pH gradients 69. Weak acrylamido derivatives containing either carboxyl groups or tertiary amino groups, supplemented by one strongly acidic and basic derivative, are available commercially under the trade name, Immobiline TM, from Pharmacia Biotechnologies, Uppsala, Sweden. These monomers finally made it possible to create and maintain stable pH gradients in electric fields until the attainment of steady-state conditions.

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

FIGURE

10

Pier-Giorgio

29

Righetti.

Immobilized pH gradients were originally invented in the small company Aminkemi, during in the synthesis of carrier ampholytes for LKB, and were first described in a Swedish patent by Gasparic et al. 7~ Righetti (Figure 10) and his group were also active in similar developments, and together with Bjellqvist and a German group they published the basic scientific paper 69 on the subject. This technique proved to be capable of higher resolving power than carrier ampholytes; a pI difference of 0.001 pH unit being sufficient for electrophoretic separation. Altland et al. 73 and others later found that the simultaneous presence of free carrier ampholytes in immobilized pH gradients improves isoelectric separation. A comprehensive review on the use of immobilized pH gradients has been published by Righetti. TM

30

A.VECV~,R~ANO F.K~R Several problems, particularly related to the alkaline chemicals used to create and maintain the pH gradient, at first impeded the spread of this method worldwide. These problems could be grouped into three categories: (i) autopolymerization to form oligomers and n-mers; (ii) hydrolysis to free acrylic acid and a diamine; and (iii) formation of N-oxides due to persulfate oxidation during polymerization. 7s The second generation of these compounds (Immobiline II) was introduced in the summer of 1988, 76 offering a stable and reliable technique of unrivalled versatility and resolving power. The autopolymerization and hydrolysis of the alkaline Immobilines TM were fully eliminated with this version. However, other artefacts, such as severe smears were observed in gradients as wide as pH 4-9, encompassing neutrality and containing the pK 7.0 Immobiline TM as one of the buffering ions. 77 The effect was found to be directly proportional to the total amount of this pK 7.0 species present in the gradient formulation. The problem was traced back to the presence of oligomers in some commercial preparations, probably formed during the synthetic step, and has since been eliminated.

VII. TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESISAND BLOTI'ING OF PROTEINS

Smithies and Poulik published the earliest application of electrophoresis in two dimensions in gels in 1956. TM However, the starch gels they used were far from optimal. Margolis and Kendrick used polyacrylamide gel (PAG) preferably with a gradient. 79 Improvements were obtained by using IEF of proteins in a rod of polyacrylamide gel for separation according to charge in the first dimension, followed by electrophoresis perpendicularly in the second dimension in a polyacrylamide gel slab as described by Dale and Latner, 8~ and Macko and Stegemann. 81 In 1970, Stegemann 82 introduced IEF in PAG followed by electrophoresis of proteins in a gel slab containing SDS to increase the negative net charge of proteins and to utilize the relationship between their size and mobility. High-resolution separation of proteins by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was obtained after pretreatment of the samples in hot SDS-urea solutions and IEF followed by SDS-PAGE as described in 1975 by O'Farrell, 83 Klose, 84 and Scheele. 8s A few years later, Anderson and Anderson 86 described the high-resolution separation of human serum proteins and the semi-automated ISO-DALT system allowing the parallel use of 20 two-dimensional electrophoresis gels. The transfer of proteins by electrophoresis from a gel slab on to a sheet of nitrocellulose or some other material is very helpful for the identification of protein spots or bands in gel slabs, after one- and twodimensional electrophoretic separations. 87 After 1985, a few groups developed general methods for direct N-terminal 88 and internal sequencing 89 of gel separated proteins not only from I-D but also from 2-D

2

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

3J

matrices. A technique, called "press-blotting," was developed using gelatin-coated nitrocellulose membranes to perform sensitive quantitative immunodetection of peptides after gel IEE 9~ One of the major difficulties in establishing 2-D maps in the early systems was the variability of spot position in the first (focusing) dimension due to both batch-to-batch variations of carrier ampholytes and pH gradient decay in conventional IEE This rendered spot identification, pattern matching, and inter-laboratory comparison quite problematic. IPGs proved to be useful in 2-D applications, resulting in constant zone position and pattern consistency. Additionally, IPGs allowed the creation of reproducible, non-linear pH gradients prepared to account for spot distribution and frequency along the pH scale. 91,92 VIII. CAPILLARY IEF

Capillary IEF is one of the separation techniques with the highest resolving power. After the first experiments performed by Hjert~n and co-workers in the mid 1980S, 93-95 hundreds of papers have appeared about its methodological aspects and utilization. Hjert~n~considered the "Father of capillary electrophoresis"~performed IEF in coated capillaries, and showed that the pattern can be obtained by hydrodynamic or electrokinetic mobilization. 96 Further methodological development in capillary IEF included the use of uncoated capillaries 97,98and the sequential injection protocol. 99 Recent years brought an extensive increase in the applications of this technique employing its exceptionally high resolving power. Methodological improvements, as well as hyphenation of capillary IEF with other electrophoretic and chromatographic separation procedures, employed its versatility in studies of clinically important proteins, recombinant products, cell lysates, and other complex mixtures. The combination of capillary IEF with mass spectrometric detection is one of the major challenges for studying proteomics. Several reviews have appeared in this field 1~176176 and a separate chapter summarizes the analytical advantages of the method. IX. SPECIAL FEATURES IN THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF IEF

Rosengren et al., 1~ described "a simple method in polyacrylamide gel slab for choosing optimum pH conditions for electrophoresis," which is a direct display of the titration curves of all the proteins present in a mixture. The first dimension consists of electrophoretically sorting the carrier ampholytes contained in the gel, thus resulting in a stationary pH gradient throughout the gel. The sample is analyzed by running it in a

32

A.VECVAR~ANO F.K~tAR trough perpendicular to the first dimension and along the pH gradient. This generates electrophoretic pH titration curves that can be used to follow up genetic mutants of the proteins, macromolecule-ligand interactions, and macromolecule-macromolecule interactions. It is possible to determine directly the pK and pI values from titration curves (see a detailed description of the technique in the monograph of Righetti42). The technique of chromatofocusing was first described by Sluyterman and co-workers. 1~176 They proposed that a pH gradient could be produced on an ion-exchange chromatography column by taking advantage of the buffering action of the charged group of the ion exchanger. If a buffer, initially adjusted to one pH value, is run through an ion-exchange column initially adjusted to a second pH value, a pH gradient is formed as if two buffers at different pH values were gradually mixed in the mixing chamber of a gradient maker. If such a pH gradient is used to elute proteins bound to the ion exchanger, the proteins elute in order of their isoelectric points. Furthermore, focusing effects take place, resulting in band sharpening, sample concentration and very high resolution. The technique is described in detail in Chapter 11. The first theoretical description of the IEF process was made by theoretical modelling from Bier's g r o u p . 111,112 They generated theoretical pH gradients with mixtures of only two or three ampholytes of known electrochemical properties under a set of known physical parameters. The theoretical background of IEF was further studied, and model calculations were performed to understand the separation process with ampholytes in coated and uncoated capillaries, i.e., in the absence and presence of electroendosmosis. 113,114

X. REVIEWS ON IEF

A review of carrier ampholytes has been published 11s and Rilbe has written an interesting autobiography. 116In addition to proceedings of meetings, books covering general theoretical and methodological aspects of the technique 117 as well as its biomedical and biological applications 118 have been published. As a general reading, the book, Electrokinetic Separation M e t h o d s 119 w a s published in 1979 and, in 2001, The Proteome Revisited: Theory and Practice of All Relevant Electrophoretic Step$120, which cover practically all aspects of electrophoresis in 21 chapters was published. A host of reviews covering practically all aspects of IEF have also been published over the years. We would like to recommend some particularly interesting works about the historical moments behind the development of IEF and its sibling electromigration techniques. Of particular relevance are the manuals fully devoted to all facets of IEF, published in 1976 by Righetti and Drysdale 12~ and about all of Righetti's fascinating writings on IEF that are difficult to surpass in both scientific

2

EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

33

value and literary language. 122 Rilbe has some equally fine retrospective writings 116,123 and Hjert~n's excellent work about the development of electrophoresis in Uppsala TM should be mentioned here. Recently several reviews have appeared by various authors. 1~176176 XI. CONCLUDING REMARKS IEF has run through a long and intensive developmental process. As with any instrumental techniques, the progress of IEF possesses maxima and minima at times when either the technique was in favor above others or it suffered from difficulties in effective applications. The convenience of searching electronic databases for following the number of scientific papers published on IEF as a "concept" from the beginning to date allows us to view these "ups and downs." Certainly, the citation index does not provide the entire number of publications or even the number of cases when the technique was employed, however, it can be useful as a measure of interest in and importance of the technique (Figure 11). It is apparent that after a very short, very intensive increase in the late 1960s (when the technique itself was born) and after the renewed interest (the introduction of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis) towards the mid1980s, a slow decrease can be seen from the 1990s. However, the overall annual production of publications is still high. The technique of IEF is fully matured now and our work is completed at this point. Further we will await more innovations that will make IEF even more versatile and useful.

FIGURE

II

The frequency of articles from 1967 dealing with IEF as a separation concept.

34

~,.VEGVAR~ AND F. K~LAR

REFERENCES 1. Kolin, A. Evolution of ideas in electrophoretic developmentsmselected highlights. In Electrophoresis'82 (Stathakos, D., Ed.) de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 3-48, 1983. 2. Volta, A. On the electricity excited by the mere contact of conducting substances of different kinds in a letter from Mr. Alexander Volta, F. R. S., Professor of Natural Philosophy at the University of Pavia. Phil. Trans. 90:403-431, 1800. 3. Reuss, F. F. Sur un nouvel effet de l'~lectricit6 galvanique. M~m. Soc. Imp~riale Nat., Moscou 2:327-337, 1809. 4. Helmholtz, H. Z. Studien fiber electrische Grenzschichten. Ann. Phys. Chem. 7:337-383, 1879. 5. Smoluchowski, M. Contribution to the theory of electro-osmosis and related phenomena. Bull Int. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, 3:184-199, 1903. 6. Gouy, G. Sur la constitution de la charge ~lectrique fi la surface d'un ~lectrolyte. J. Phys. 9:457-468, 1910. 7. Chapman, D. L. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity. Phil. Mag. 6:475-481, 1913. 8. Stern, O. The theory of the electrolytic double-layer. Z. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. Chem. 30:508-516, 1924. 9. Debye, P. and Hiickel, E. The theory of electrolytes. I. Lowering of freezing point and related phenomena. Physik. Z. 24:185-206, 1923. 10. Arrhenius, S. A. Recherches sur la conductibilit~ galvanique des ~lectrolytes (Investigations on the galvanic conductivity of electrolytes). Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University, 1884. 11. Kohlrausch, F. Ober Concentrations - Verschiebungen durch Electrolyse im Inneren von L6sungen und L6sungsgemischen. Ann. Phys. Chem. 62:209-239, 1897. 12. Lodge, O. On the migration of ions and an experimental determination of absolute ionic velocity. In Report of the 56th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 389-413, 1886. 13. Tiselius, A. The moving boundary method of studying the electrophoresis of proteins. Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University, 1930. 14. Picton, H. and Linder, S. E. Solution and pseudo-solution. Part I. J. Chem. Soc. 61:148-172, 1892. 15. Durrum, E. L. A Microelectrophoretic and microionophoretic technique. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72:2943-2948, 1950. 16. Michl, H. Hochspannungs Elektrophorese, Thieme, Stuttgart, Germany, 1962. 17. Smithies, O. Zone electrophoresis in starch gels: group variation in the serum proteins of normal human adults. Biochem. J. 61:629-641, 1955. 18. Raymond, S. and Weintraub, L. S. Acrylamide gel as a separation medium for zone electrophoresis. Science 130:711, 1959. 19. Davis, B. J. and Orstein, L. A new high resolution electrophoresis method. A paper presented at The Society of the Study of Blood, N. Y. Acad. of Med., 1959. 20. Hjert~n, S. Presented by A. Tiselius in Quarterly Report No. 1 to European Research Office (985/DU) US Department of the Army, Frankfurt/Main, Germany, APO 757, US Forces, 1960. 21. Hjert~n, S. Agarose as an anticonvection agent in zone electrophoresis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 53:514-517, 1961. 22. Ikeda, K. and Suzuki, S. Separating glutamic acid and other products of hydrolysis of albuminous substances from each other by electrolysis. US Patent No. 1,015-891, 1912. 23. Williams, R. R. and Waterman, R. E. Electrodialysis as a means of characterizing ampholytes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 27:56-59, 1929. 24. du Vigneaud, V., Irwing, G. W., Dyer, H. M. and Sealock, R. R. Electrophoresis of posterior pituitary gland preparations. J. Biol. Chem. 123:45-55, 1938. 25. Kolin, A. Separation and concentration of proteins in a pH field combined with an electric field. J. Chem. Phys. 22:1628-1629, 1954.

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

~

26. Kolin, A. Isoelectric spectra and mobility spectra: A new approach to electrophoretic separation. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 41:101-110, 1955. 27. Kolin, A. Electrophoretic "line spectra". J. Chem. Phys. 23:407-408, 1955. 28. Kolin, A. In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis: Proceedings of the International Symposium, August 2-4, 1976, Hamburg, Germany (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D. Eds.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 3-33, 1977. 29. Friedli, W. and Schumacher, E. 13ber elektrophoretische Ionenfokussienung X. Die Analyse von Seltenen Erdgemischen. Helv. Chim. Acta 44:1829-1856, 1961. 30. Michl, H. Quantitative measurement of electrophoresis diagrams on filter paper. Monatsh. Chem. 83:210-220, 1952. 31. Righetti, P. G. Recent Developments in Titration Curves of Proteins by Isoelectric Focusing-Electrophoresis. In Electrophoresis "81 (Allen, R. C. and Arnaud, P. Eds.) de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 65.5-665, 1981. 32. Stahl, E. Gradient and low-temperature thin-layer chromatography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 3:784-791, 1964. 33. Stahl, E. and Miller, J. pH-Gradient-Diinnschicht-Chromatographie von Benzodiazepinen. J. Chromatogr. 209:484-488, 1981. 34. Tate, M. E. Determination of ionization constants by paper electrophoresis. Biochem. J. 195:419-429, 1981. 35. Jokl, V., Dolej~ovfi, J. and Matu~ovfi, M. Zone electrophoresis of organic acids and bases in water-alcohol solvents. J. Chromatogr. 172:239-248, 1979. 36. Tiselius, A. Stationary electrophoresis of ampholyte solutions. Svensk kemisk tidskrift 53:305-310, 1941. 37. Svensson, H. A discussion on the meaning of equivalent weights and transport (transference) numbers for amphoteric electrolytes, especially protolytes. Sci. Tools 3:30-35, 1956. 38. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. I. The differential equation of solute concentrations at a steady state and its solution for simple cases. Acta Chem. Scand. 15:325-341, 1961. 39. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. II. Buffering capacity and conductance of isoionic ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand. 16:456-466, 1962. 40. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. III. Description of apparatus for electrolysis in columns stabilized by density gradients and direct determination of isoelectric points. Arch. Biochem. (Suppl. 1):132-135, 1962. 41. Vesterberg, O. Synthesis and isoelectric fractionation of carrier ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand. 23:2653-2666, 1969. 42. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric Focusing: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 15-31, 1983. 43. Vesterberg, O. Separation of proteins from carrier ampholytes. Sci. Tools 16:24-27, 1969. 44. Vesterberg, O. History of electrophoretic methods. J. Chromatogr. 480:3-19, 1989. 45. Vesterberg, O. and Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. IV. Further studies on the resolving power in connection with the separation of myoglobins. Acta. Chem. Scand. 20:820-834. 1966. 46. Vesterberg, O. Isoelectric focusing of proteins. Svensk kemisk tidskrift 80:213-225, 1968. 47. Rilbe, H. and Pettersson, S. A Simple method for preparation of approximately constant density gradients in small columns. Separ. Sci. Technol. 3:535-549, 1968. 48. Jonsson, M., Pettersson, P. and Rilbe, H. Scanning isoelectric focusing in small densitygradient columns. I. Use of a standard spectrophotometer cuvette for focusing, chemical modification of proteins by migrating reactive ions. Anal. Biochem. 51:557-576, 1973. 49. Fredriksson, S. Scanning isoelectric focusing in small density-gradient columns 4. Use of deuterium-oxide for preparing density gradient and its effects on isoelectric points of proteins. J. Chromatogr. 108:153-167, 1975.

36

A.VEGVARI AND F. KlUkR

50. Rilbe, H. and Pettersson, P. Preparative isoelectric focusing in short density gradient columns with vertical cooling. In Isoelectric Focusing, (Arbuthnott, J. P. and Beeley, J. A. Eds.) Butterworths, London, pp. 44-57, 1975. 51. Vesterberg, O. The carrier ampholytes. In Isoelectric Focusing (Catsimpoolas, N., Ed.) Academic Press, London, pp. 53-76, 1976. 52. Pogacar, P. and Jarecki, R. Isoelectric focusing using inorganic acidic ampholytes In: Electrophoresis and Isoelectric Focusing in Polyacrylamide gel, (Allen, R. C. and Maurer, H. R. Eds.) de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 153-158, 1974. 53. Grubhofer, N. and Borja, C. Synthesis of carrier ampholytes for isoelectric focusing containing sulfonic and phosphonic acid groups covering a wide pH range. In Electrophoresis and Isoelectric Focusing: Proc. Int. Syrup. 1976 (Radola, B. J. and Greassin, D. Eds.) de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 111-120, 1977. 54. Williams, K. W. and S6derberg, L. A. Carrier ampholyte for isoelectric focusing. Int. Lab. 1:45-53, 1979. 55. S6derberg, L., Buckley, D., Hagstr6m, G. and Bergstr6m, J. The chemical properties of pharmalyte. In Protides of the Biological Fluids, (Peelers, H. Ed.) Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 687-691, 1979. 56. Vinogradov, S. N., Lowenkron, S., Andonian, H. R., Bagshow, J., Felgenhauer, K. and Pak, S. J. Synthetic ampholytes for the isoelectric focusing of proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 54:501-506, 1973. 57. Charlionet, R., Martin, J. P., Sesboue, R., Madec, P. J. and Lefebvre, F. Synthesis of highly diversified carrier ampholytesmevaluation of the resolving power of isoelectricfocusing in the Pi system (alpha-l-antitrypsin genetic-polymorphism). J. Chromatogr. 176:89-101, 1979. 58. Charlionet, R., Morcamp, C., Sesboue, R. and Martin, J. P. Limiting factors for the resolving power of isoelectric-focusing in natural pH gradients. J. Chromatogr. 205:355-366, 1981. 59. Just, W. W. Synthesis of carrier ampholyte mixtures suitable for isoelectric fractionation analysis. Anal. Biochem. 102:134-144, 1980. 60. Righetti, P. G. and Hjert4n, S. High-molecular-weight carrier ampholytes for isoelectric focusing of peptides J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 5:259-272, 1981. 61. Luner, S. J. and Kolin, A. A new approach to isoelectric focusing and fractionation of proteins in a pH gradient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 66:898-903, 1970. 62. Lundahl, P. and Hjert6n, S. Isoelectric focusing in free Ampholine T M solution and attempts at isoelectric focusing in pH gradients created in ordinary buffers. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 200:94-111, 1973. 63. Troitzki, G. V., Savialov, V. P., Kirjukhin, I. F., Abramov, V. M. and Agitsky, G. J. Isoelectric focusing of proteins using a pH gradient by a concentration gradient of nonelectrolytes in solution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 400:24-31, 1975. 64. Vesterberg, O. Isoelectric focusing of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 257:11-30, 1972. 65. Vesterberg, O. Isoelectric focusing of proteins in thin layers of polyacrylamide gels. Sci. Tools 20:22-29, 1973. 66. G6rg, A., Postel, W. and Westermeier, R. Ultra-thin-layer isoelectric-focusing in polyacrylamide gels on cellophane. Anal. Biochem. 89:60-70, 1978. 67. Hjert~n, S. Free zone electrophoresis. Chromatogr. Rev. 9:122-219, 1967. 68. Hjert4n, S. Zone electrophoresis, isoelectric focusing, and displacement electrophoresis (isotachophoresis) in carrier-free solution. In Methods of Protein Separation, Vol. 2, (Catsimpoolas, N. Ed.) Plenum, New York, pp. 219-231, 1976. 69. Bjellqvist, B., Ek, K., Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., G6rg, A., Postel, W. and Westermeier, R. Isoelectric-focusing in immobilized pH gradients~Principle, methodology and some applications. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 6:317-339, 1982. 70. Gasparic, V., Bjellqvist, B. and Rosengren, ]~. Manufacture of a pH-function for electrophoretic separation. Swedish Patent no. 7514049-1, 1975.

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

~7

71. Rosengren, A., Bjellqvist, B. and Gasparic, V. Manufacture of a pH-function for electrophoretic separation. US Patent no. 4,130,470, 1978. 72. Rosengren, ]k., Bjellqvist, B. and Gasparic, V. Manufacture of a pH-function for electrophoretic separation. German Patent no. 2656162, 1981. 73. Altland, K. and Rossmann, U. Hybrid isoelectric focusing in rehydrated immobilized pH gradients with added carrier ampholytes: demonstration of human globins. Electrophoresis 6:314-325, 1985. 74. Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH Gradients: Theory and Methodology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990. 75. Righetti, P. G., Chiari, M., Casale, E. and Chiesa, C. Oxidation of alkaline immobiline buffers for isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients. Appl. Theor. Electrophoresis 1:115-121, 1989. 76. Gaveby, B. M., Pettersson, E., Andrasko, J., Ineva-Flygare, L., Johannesson, U., G6rg, A., Postel, W., Domscheit, A., Mauri, E. L., Pietta, E., Gianazza, E. and Righetti, P. G. Stable storage-conditions of immobiline chemicals for isoelectric-focusing. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 16:141-164, 1988. 77. Esteve-Romero, J., Simb-Alfonso, E., Bossi, A., Bresciani, F. and Righetti, P. G. Sample streaks and smears in immobilized pH gradient gels. Electrophoresis 17:704-708, 1996. 78. Smithies, O. and Poulik, M. D. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of serum proteins. Nature 177:1033, 1956. 79. Margolis, J. and Kenrick, K. G. Two-dimensional resolution of plasma proteins by combination of polyacrylamide disc and gradient gel electrophoresis. Nature 221:1056-1057, 1969. 80. Dale, G. and Latner, A. L. Isoelectric focusing of serum proteins in acrylamide gels followed by electrophoresis. Clin. Chim. Acta 24:61-68, 1969. 81. Macko, V. and Stegemann, H. Mapping of proteins by combined electrofocusing and electrophoresis. Identification of varieties. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Phys. Chem. 350:917-919, 1969. 82. Stegemann, H. Proteinfraktionierungen in Polyacrylamid und die Anwendung auf die genetische Analyse bei Pflanzen. Angew. Chem. 82:640, 1970. 83. O'Farrell, P. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins J. Biol. Chem. 250:4007-4021, 1975. 84. Klose, J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis of mouse tissuesmNovel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik 26:231-243, 1975. 85. Scheele, G. A. Two-dimensional gel analysis of soluble proteins. Charaterization of guinea pig exocrine pancreatic proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250:5375-5385, 1975. 86. Anderson, N. L. and Anderson, N. G. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of human plasma proteins Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5421-5425, 1977. 87. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. and Gordon, J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4350-4354, 1977. 88. Aebersold, R., Leavitt, J., Saavedra, R. A., Hood, L-E. and Kent, S. B. H Electroblotting onto activated glass--high-efficiency preparation of proteins from analytical sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels for direct sequence-analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 261:4229-4238, 1986. 89. Aebersold, R., Leavitt, J., Saavedra, R. A., Hood, L. E. and Kent, S. B. H Internal amino-acid sequence-analysis of proteins separated by one-dimensional or two-dimensional gel-electrophoresis after in situ protease digestion on nitrocellulose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:6970-6974, 1987. 90. Van der Sluis, P. J., Pool, C. W. and Sluiter, A. A. Press-blotting on gelatin-coated nitrocellulose membranes. A method for sensitive quantitative immunodetection of peptides after gel isoelectric focusing. J. Immunol. Methods 104:65-71, 1987.

38

A.VEGVARIAND F. KItAR 91. Gianazza, E., Giacon, P., Sahlin, B. and Righetti, P. G. Non-linear pH courses with immobilized pH gradients Electrophoresis 6:53-56, 2004. 92. G6rg, A., Postel, W., Gunther, S. and Weser, J. Improved horizontal two-dimensional electrophoresis with hybrid isoelectric-focusing in immobilized pH gradients in the I stdimension and laying-on transfer to the 2hal-dimension. Electrophoresis 6:599-604, 1985. 93. Hjert~n, S. and Zhu, M-D. Adaptation of the equipment for high-performance electrophoresis to isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 346:265-270, 1985. 94. Hjert6n, S., Kilfir, F., Liao, J. L. and Zhu, M-D. Use of high-performance electrophoresis apparatus for isoelectric focusing. In Electrophoresis "86, (Dunn, M. J., Ed.) VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, pp. 451-461, 1986. 95. Hjert~n, S., Elenbring, K., Kilfir, F., Liao, J. L., Chen, A. J., Siebert, C. E. and Zhu, M-D. Carrier-free zone electrophoresis, displacement electrophoresis and isoelectricfocusing in a high-performance electrophoresis apparatus. J. Chromatogr. 403:47-61, 1987. 96. Hjert~n, S., Liao, J. L. and Yao, K. Theoretical and experimental study of high-preformance electrophoretic mobilization of isoelectrically focused protein zones. ]. Chromatogr. 387:127-138, 1987. 97. Mazzeo, J. R. and Krull, I. S. Capillary isoelectric focusing of proteins in uncoated fused-silica capillaries using polymeric additives. Anal. Chem. 63:2852-2857, 1991. 98. Thormann, W., Caslavska, J., Molteni, S. and Chmelik, J. Capillary isoelectric focusing with electroosmotic zone displacement and on-column multichannel detection. J. Chromatogr. 589:321-328, 1992. 99. Kilfir, F., V~gvfiri, A. and M6d, A. New set-up for capillary isoelectric focusing in uncoated capillaries. J. Chromatogr. A 813:349-360, 1998. 100. Wehr, T., Zhu, M. and Rodriguez-Diaz, R. Capillary isoelectric focusing. Methods Enzymol. 270:358-374, 1996. 101. Righetti, P. G., Gelfi, C. and Conti, M. Current trends in capillary isoelectric focusing of proteins. J. Chromatogr. B 699:91-104, 1997. 102. Righetti, P. G. and Bossi, A. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: an update. J. Chromatogr. B 699:77-89, 1997. 103. Fang, X. H., Tragas, C., Wu, J. Q., Mao, Q. L. and Pawliszyn, J. Recent developments in capillary isoelectric focusing with whole-column imaging detection. Electrophoresis 19:2290-2295, 1998. 104. Dolnik, V. and Hutterer, K. M. Capillary electrophoresis of proteins 1999-2001. Electrophoresis 22:4163-4 178, 2001. 105. Shimura, K. Recent advances in capillary isoelectric focusing: 1997-2001. Electrophoresis 23:3847-3857, 2002. 106. Kilfir, F. Recent applications of capillary isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 24:3908-3916, 2003. 107. Rosengren, A., Bjellqvist, B. and Gasparic, V. A simple method of choosing optimum pH-conditions for electrophoresis In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis, Proc. Int. Symp. (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D. Eds.) de Gruyter, Berlin pp. 165-171, 1977. 108. Sluyterman, L. A. and Wijdenes, J. Chromatofocusing: isoelectric focusing on ion exchangers in the absence of an externally applied potential. In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis, Proc. Int. Symp. (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D. Eds.) de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 463-466, 1977. 109. Sluyterman, L. A. and Elgersma, O. Chromatofocusing: isoelectric focusing on ion exchange columns. I. General principles. J. Chromatogr. 150:17-30, 1978 110. Sluyterman, L. A. and Wijdenes, J. Chromatofocusing: isoelectric focusing on ion exchange columns. II. Experimental verification. J. Chromatogr. 150:31-44, 1978. 111. Bier, M., Mosher, R. A. and Palusinski, O. A. Computer-simulation and experimental validation of isoelectric focusing in Ampholine-free systems J. Chromatogr. 211:313-335, 1981.

2

EVOLUTIONAND DEVELOPMENT OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

3~

112. Palusinski, O. A., Allgyer, T. T., Mosher, R. A., Bier, M. and SaviUe,D. A. Mathematicalmodeling and computer-simulation of isoelectric-focusing with electrochemically defined ampholytes Biophys. Chem. 13: 193-202, 1981. 113. Steinmann, L., Mosher, R. A. and Thormann, W. Characterization and impact of the temporal behavior of the electroosmotic flow in capillary isoelectric focusing with electroosmotic zone displacement. J. Chromatogr. A 756:219-232, 1996. 114. Mao, Q., Pawliszyn, J. and Thormann, W. Dynamics of capillary isoelectric focusing in the absence of fluid flow: High-resolution computer simulation and experimental validation with whole column optical imaging. Anal. Chem. 72:5493-5502, 2000. 115. Radola, B. J. Isoelectric focusing in layers of granulated gels. 2. Preparative isoelectric focusing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 386:181-195, 1975. 116. Rilbe, H. A scientific life with chemistry, optics and mathematics. Electrophoresis 5:1-17, 1984. 117. Catsimpoolas, N. (Ed.)Isoelectric Focusing, Academic Press, New York, 1976. 118. Catsimpoolas, N. and Drysdale, J. W. Biological and Biomedical Applications of Isoelectric Focusing. Plenum Press, New York, 1977. 119. Righetti, P. G., van Oss, C. J. and Vanderhoff, J. Electrokinetic Separation Methods. Elsevier, North-Holland, New York, 1979. 120. Righetti, P. G. and Drysdale, J. W. Isoelectric Focusing. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1976. 121. Righetti, P. G., Stoyanov, A. and Zhukov, M. The Proteome Revisited: Theory and Practice of all Relevant Electrophoretic Steps. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001. 122. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric-focusing as the crow flies. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 16:99-108, 1988. 123. Rilbe, H. Some reminiscences of the history of electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 16:1354-1359, 1995. 124. Hjert~n, S. The history of the development of electrophoresis in Uppsala. Electrophoresis 9:3-15, 1988. 125. Bier, M. Scale-up of isoelectric-focusing. ACS Syrup. Ser. 314:185-192, 1986. 126. Righetti, P. G. and Bossi, A. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: recent analytical and preparative developments. Anal. Biochem. 247:1-10, 1997. 127. Bier, M. Recycling Isoelectric focusing and isotachophoresis. Electrophoresis 19:1057-1063, 1998.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

3

THEORY AND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING ToL. S O U N A R T a, P.A. SAFIER b, A N D J.C. B A Y G E N T S b

~ National Laboratories,Albuquerque, NM 87185-141 I bThe University of Arizona, Tucson,AZ 85721

I. PRINCIPLES OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING A. Steady Focusing and the Isoelectric Point B. FocusingTransients in a Steady pH Gradient II. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF IEF A. Balance Laws B. Initial and Boundary Conditions C. Numerical Implementation III. ILLUSTRATIVE SIMULATIONS OF IEF IV. SUMMARY REFERENCES

I. PRINCIPLES OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

Isoelectric focusing (IEF) is an electrophoretic separation scheme tailored to amphoteric compounds. IEF is used primarily to resolve mixtures of proteins and/or peptides. Similar to any other charged solute, an amphoteric compound translates under the action of an externally applied electric field~a process known alternatively as electromigration or eleco trophoresis. Owing to the chemical composition of amphoteric substances, their electrophoretic mobility is a function of pH: at low pH, the mobility is positive; at high pH, the mobility is negative. The generic relationship between electrophoretic mobility and pH is sketched for an amphoteric compound in Figure 1, where ~/E denotes the electrophoretic mobility, and the curve is drawn for a solution of (approximately) constant ionic strength. The isoelectric point (pI) is the pH at which the electrophoretic mobility of the compound is nil. At a given ionic strength, each amphoteric species evinces a different pI and, in the IEF scheme, these differences in pI serve as the basis to resolve separands. 9 2005 ElsevierInc. All rightsreserved. Handbookof IsoelectricFocusingand Proteomics D. Garfinand S. Ahuja,editors.

41

42

T.L. SOUNART et al.

PE

pl

pH

F I G U R E I Generic behavior of electrophoretic mobility versus pH for an amphoteric species at constant ionic strength.

Since electrophoretic mobility is sensitive to pH, if an amphoteric species is placed in a buffer of non-uniform pH, the compound will move with an electrophoretic velocity that depends on position. The coupling between electrophoretic motion and pH leads to the focusing behavior sketched in Figure 2. Typically, IEF begins with separands distributed uniformly along the separation axis z. Under the circumstances shown in the figure, an amphoteric compound with a pI equal to the pH at z0, migrates in the direction of the field if the substance is positioned at Z z0. At z0, which is the position of the isoelectric point, the electrophoretic velocity of the compound vanishes. Thus a given amphoteric compound accumulates, or focuses, in the neighborhood of its isoelectric point. The concept put forth in Figure 2 was first implemented by Kolin, 1 who focused proteins in the region between two counter-diffusing buffers of different pH values. Because pH gradients generated in this fashion are transient, the idea of IEF did not become broadly useful until Svensson 2-4 and Vesterberg s,6 developed the requisite chemistries to generate stable pH gradients.

A. Steady Focusing and the Isoelectric Point The purpose of this chapter is to discuss quantitative models of the IEF process. As we shall see later, constructing a thorough mathematical description of IEF is not a trivial matter. For the moment, however, we can restrict ourselves to the simple scenario depicted in Figure 2 and begin to uncover some of the underlying principles of IEE

3

4:3

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

pH

I

f

Zo

Z

UE

I

f

Z

Zo

BE

~-

j

/

/

\

/

\

I

Zo

BE

~

\

\ Z

F I G U R E 2 Isoelectric focusing of an amphoteric species in a local pH gradient. The electric field is taken to point from left to right (toward increasing z). Shown respectively in the panels, from top to bottom, are the pH and, for an amphoteric compound that focuses at position z0, the electrophoretic velocity U E and the concentration C as a function of z.

44

T.L. SOUNART et al.

Let C denote the concentration of an amphoteric species distributed along the separation axis z. If an electric field is applied so as to drive electrophoretic transport along the separation axis, conservation of the amphoteric species requires that /)C /)f ~t + -~z = 0

(1)

where t denotes time and f is the flux of the amphoteric compound due to imposition of the field, viz. ~C f = U E C - D ~--~

(2)

In Equation (2), UE is the electrophoretic velocity and D is the diffusivity of the amphoteric species; the first term on the right-hand side (RHS) of (2) accounts for electrophoretic transport and the second for Brownian motion. At steady state, 8C/8t = 0, and it follows that f = 0, so long as the IEF device is designed to prevent the loss of species at the ends of the separation chamber. Equation (2) then rearranges to give

dC UE(Z) = ~dz C D

(3)

where is has been noted that, due to the pH gradient, the electrophoretic velocity depends on position z, i.e., UE = UE(z ). Now UE is generally a complicated function of position, but at the isoelectric point, Ur vanishes. An expansion of UE in z can thus be written as UE(z) = ( Z - Z o ) U ~ ( z o )

1

+~(Z-Zo)2U

~ (Z--ZO)n U(E")(Zo) (4) "" ' E~Zo~+" " " = ~" n! n=l

where primes indicate differentiation with respect to z. Combining (3) and (4) yields C = Cma x

[I~=I(Z--ZO)n+I ] (n+ 1)! U(En)(zO)

exp ~

(5)

where Cma x is the concentration at z0. On the RHS of (5), all but the leading term in the summation are negligible near the isoelectric point. Therefore C ~ Cma x

exp

[ U~(z0) 2D (z-z~ 1

(6)

for Z-Zo, that are in some sense small. If we recall from Figure 2 that U~(zo)< 0, we see that Equation (6) describes a steady Gaussian distribution of the amphoteric compound about the mean position z0~a result first derived by Rilbe. 7 The variance

3

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

45

of this distribution is-D/U~(zo), so D and U~(zo) are experimental parameters that influence the peak shape (height and breadth). Intuition tells us that peak width should increase with diffusivity, but the effect of U'E(Zo)is not immediately obvious. Application of the chain rule gives

U (zo)

=

dU E d(pH) d(pH) dz

=

d~/E d(pH) d(pH) E dz

(7)

where we have taken the electric field E to be independent of pH. Equation (7) suggests that U~(zo)varies linearly, and the peak variance inversely, with the electric field strength, the pH gradient, and the sensitivity of the mobility to pH. The separation scientist has some control over the first two of these parameters; the latter is a property of the amphoteric compound (although one can choose background electrolytes, buffer types and strengths, etc., that might promote sensitivity to pH). The concentration Cmax that appears in Equation (6) corresponds to the height of the focused peak. To relate Cmax to the design of the separation scheme, we write a mass balance on the amphoteric compound: Mto t --

SfoLC(z,t)dz

(8)

where Mto t is the total amount of the amphoteric species introduced to a separation chamber of length L and cross-sectional area S. According to Equation (6) the steady-state concentration is negligible at positions along the separation axis that are distant from z0. With an exponentially small error, then, we can substitute (6) into (8) and integrate. This yields Cmax -

Mt~ ~/ - Wl~(z0) S 2a:D

(9)

if we assume that L is large compared with the standard deviation of the peak distribution. As we might have anticipated, Equation (9) shows that the peak height is enhanced by the same factors that diminish variance, as well as by the amount of compound added per unit area of the separation chamber. From a straightforward mathematical formulation, the results obtained in Equations (6), (7) and (9) offer a surprisingly clean description of the steady state: amphoteric separands distribute normally about their individual pI values. The height and width of the Gaussian peaks depend on the imposed field strength, the pH gradient, and certain properties of the separands, namely, their diffusivity and the sensitivity of their mobility to pH near their isoelectric point. To describe the dynamics of IEF, however, we must take a more sophisticated approach. This is true for several reasons, not the least of which is that, in many cases, the pH gradient used to separate compounds evolves contemporaneously with the transport of the amphoteric compounds that are targeted for separation.

46

T.L. SOUNART et al.

Before moving on to the topics of dynamics, it is worth noting that one of the reasons IEF is useful is that it evolves to a persistent steady state. For instance, the profile given by (6) arises irrespective of the initial condition on Cmprovided a stable pH gradient is generated. Figure 3 illustrates a hypothetical arrangement that yields no focusing of the amphoteric compound. Such a situation does not occur in practice; the electric field used to drive the electrophoretic transport of the separands to their respective pI values is also coupled with the generation of the pH profile. The electrode processes are such that the anodic end of the chamber is acidic and the cathodic end is basic. Therefore a steady arrangement of the electric field and the pH, as sketched in Figure 3, does not occur. Mosher et al. 8 discuss the generation of pH gradients in substantial detail and the reader should consult their monograph, as well as Chapter 4 of this text, to learn more.

B. Focusing Transients in a Steady pH Gradient If we wish to examine the dynamics of the isoelectric focusing process, in general, we will have to consider the solution to a coupled set of non-linear balance laws that, at the very minimum, accounts for conservation of chemical species and satisfies Maxwell's equations for the electric field, which will be done in the later sections. In the interim it is instructive to consider the behavior of an amphoteric compound that is initially dispersed along a separation axis where the pH is fixed in space and time, as might be the case in a polyacrylamide gel with an immobilized pH gradient. 9 Under such a circumstance, Equation (1) suffices to describe the spatiotemporal evolution of the concentration of the ampholyte (amphoteric compound). Taking the pH and the electric field to be steady and decoupled from C, we can express the electrophoretic velocity of the amphoteric compound as U E = Uog(z )

(10)

where g(z) is some known function of position and U0 is indicative of the magnitude of the electrophoretic velocity. On substituting (10) into (2), we obtain the following dimensionless balance law from (1): ~)C ~ 1 ~2C at + --a-Tx[g(x)C] = Pe ax 2

(11)

where x (=z/L) is the axial position scaled on L and C and t are now dimensionless. The time and concentration scales are L/U 0 and Mtot/LS, respectively. P e - UoL/D is a Peclet number weighing the relative importance of electrophoretic motion versus diffusion. When the ampholyte balance is cast in the form of Equation (11), it is immediately evident that C will depend on the dimensionless parameter

3

47

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRICFOCUSING

pH

Z

Zo

UE

Zo

\

/ \

UE J

f

/

\

UE

\ / Zo

/

f

Z

F I G U R E 3 A local pH gradient that precludes focusing.The electric field is taken to point from left to right (toward increasing axial position z). Shown respectively in the panels, from top to bottom, are the pH and, for an amphoteric compound with a pl at z0, the electrophoretic velocity U E and the concentration C as a function of z.

4~

T.L. SOUNART et al.

Pe, i.e., C = C(x, t; Pe). Typically Pe is quite large (>104) and, as will be seen, the Peclet number has a strong influence on the problem. The function g(x) accounts for spatial variations of the electrophoretic velocity of the ampholyte; g(x) is a property of the mobility versus pH behavior of the particular ampholyte in question (e.g., Figure 1), as well as the electric field and the pH profile in the separation chamber. One must typically rely on numerical methods to construct solutions to (11 ), primarily because of the spatial dependence of g(x). The form of g(x) follows from the prescribed pH profile, the electric field, and the titration or mobility data for the ampholyte (e.g., Table 1). For the calculations presented in this section, the pH profile is taken to be linear in x, the electric field is uniform and the resultant g(x) is closely approximated by cubic polynomials. Separate calculations will be shown for the proteins ferritin (Fer) and albumin (Alb). In the calculations for Fer, the pH is 2.0 at x = 0 and 10.0 at x = 1; for Alb, the pH varies from 3.0 to 11.15. The numerical solutions to (11) at selected times for Fer and Alb are shown in Figures 4 and 5. The proteins are initially distributed uniformly over the interval 0 _ x _ 1 and Pe = 106. Notice that by the time t moves past unity, the proteins have accumulated near their respective pI values, and at longer times the peaks are Gaussian. To obtain the time scales involved, consider the following. For the case of Fer with Pe = 106 (Figure 4), if the length of the separation axis L is 10cm, then the electric field is approximately 110V/cm and t = 1 corresponds to a dimensional time of about 5.3min. For Alb (Figure 5) with Pe= 106 and L = 10 cm, the electric field is 40 V/cm and t = 1 corresponds to 2.9 min. The results shown in Figures 4 and 5 were obtained with a numerical technique called flux-corrected transport 1~ (FCT), which is designed to accommodate advectively dominated (i.e., high Peclet number) problems of the sort considered here. A comparison of results obtained by this method and another numerical technique (Petrov-Galerkin finite elements ~z) is shown in Figure 6. Notice that the FCT method captures the steep transitions more faithfully, which is an attribute that makes the method an attractive tool for the simulation of electrophoretic separations, a3 The steady-state peaks for Alb at various Peclet numbers are shown in Figure 7. It is clear from these results that not only are the peaks Gaussian, but they narrow and their height increases with increasing Peclet number (Figure 8). More specifically, scaling arguments based on Equation (6) give that, for Pe >>1, the peak variance should change linearly with Pe -a and Cmax should vary as Pel/2. F~ure 9 confirms this assertion, where plots of Pe • variance and Cmax/VPea r e markedly insensitive to changes in Pe. Finally, it should be noted that, amongst the computational challenges posed by high Peclet numbers is the fine mesh required to resolve the narrow peaks that develop as the focusing proceeds. Since the variance scales as depends on 1/Pe. the standard deviation of the peak (i.e., the peak width) scales as 1/P~e. At Pe= 10 6, if one were to discretize the

3

49

THEORY AND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

TABLE

I

Protein Properties I Net charge

pH

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.8 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.8 6.0 6.5 6.8 7.0 7.5 7.8 8.0 8.5 8.8 9.0 9.5 10.0 11.0 11.1 11.15 eco~ (10 -4 cm2/V s)

Hem

68.5 43.5

AIb

58.0 44.5 35.5 22.0 13.0 8.0 3.0

25.5

Fer

18.8 13.2 8.5 5.0 2.0

0.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 -3.5 -6.1

10.3

-5.5 -6.8 -12.2

0.0

-8.5 -10.0 -18.3

-10.3

-11.5 -13.0 -24.4

-20.5 -30.8 -50.0

0.265

-32.0 -48.0 -64.0 0.231

-17.0 -19.5 -23.0

0.126

1Hem and Alb data from Reference 8 and Fer data from Reference 22.

c o m p u t a t i o n a l d o m a i n uniformly (equally spaced nodes), one could expect that no m o r e t h a n a few grid points w o u l d be located within the peak, even if as m a n y as a t h o u s a n d nodes were to be employed. To maintain c o m p u tational efficiency, it is useful to employ a n o n - u n i f o r m grid, with m a n y nodes positioned a b o u t the pI. Results obtained with uniform and nonu n i f o r m grids are s h o w n in Figure 10, for Fer c o n c e n t r a t i o n at Pe = 107.

50

T.L. SOUNART et al. 500

400

t=5.o

300

0

200

4.0

100

0 0.29

!

0.30

0.31 0.32 x (d'less)

0.33

0.34

F I G U R E 4 Ferritin concentration versus position for selected times. A t t - 0 , C - I for all x; Pe-- 106, Numerical solutions obtained by the FCT method. I~ The spatial domain x e [0, I] is discretized non-uniformly (1001 nodes); the computational mesh was generated with T - 10 in Equation (5-223) of Anderson. II

400 t=lO 300 "

200 0

6 100

0 0.46

0.48

0.47

x (d'less) F I G U R E 5 A l b u m i n c o n c e n t r a t i o n versus Computational parameters are as in Figure 4.

position

for

selected

times.

3

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

51

b

t,/) 0rJ ..,..

=o

(.3

c,t 0

IJl

0:2

0:4

,

0.6

L~t\

0.8

1

x (d'less) F I G U R E 6 Transient numerical solutions for c o n c e n t r a t i o n versus position: (a) and (c): Petrov-Galerkin finite elementsl2; (b) and (d): FCT.'~ A t t - O, C -- I for all x. Concentration profiles are shown at dimensionless times of 0.2 and 0.35. The protein is albumin and P e - 106. Each calculation uses 1001 nodes to discretize the spatial domain x e [0, I ] . T h e n o n - u n i f o r m mesh was generated with T--10 in Equation (5-223) of Anderson. II

II. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF IEF The quantitative description we have presented so far is primitive in the sense that we have set aside the detailed physicochemical processes associated with IEE For example, we have yet to account for the underlying development of a pH gradient suitable for IEF and we have ignored the important ionogenic mass-action equilibria that are characteristic of ampholytes. In this section we correct these deficiencies and lay out a comprehensive model of IEE This is done chiefly by writing conservation relations for the electric charge and each of the chemical species that comprise the system (i.e., relationships akin to Equation (1)). A. Balance Laws A general set of balance laws governing the transport of ionic and neutral compounds in electrophoretic separations was developed in the 1980s, 14-16and later detailed in a monograph by Mosher et al. 8 This coupled set of non-linear partial differential and algebraic equations includes an

52

T.L. SOUNART et al. 125

100 05

~

75

0

50

25

0 0.40

0.50

0.60

x (d'less)

(a) 1200

107

800 (D

=o 0 v

400

0

0.46

0.47

(b) I

FIGURE and I0 7.

k,

0.48

x (d'less) 7

Steady-state focusing of albumin at (a) Pe -- 10 4 and I 0 s and (b) Pe - 10 6

unsteady electromigration-diffusion equation for each solutal component, a charge balance, the electroneutrality approximation, expressions for ionogenic dissociation-association equilibria, and a model for calculating protein mobilities as a function of pH and ionic strength. The balance laws

3

53

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING _ 104

1 0 -3

10"4C

0 t"-

10 ~ -

._m ">CI~ 10 "6

..~3-

"

.I /

~ O

~o" ~ " ~ET"

E

10 2

10-7

J

t

101

10 .8 10 4

10 s

10 6

10 7

Pe 1

F I G U R E 8 Scaled peak variance ( - - ) and scaled C m a x (---) versus Pe: (O) Fer; ([3) AIb. Remaining c o m p u t a t i o n a l p a r a m e t e r s are as specified in Figure 4.

2.0

,0.5

1.5 e0 ' -

[]

[]

EB-

-15]

JO.4

c~

>c~ 1.0 X CD

% O

13. 0

0

0.5

0.0

104

E

0.3

i

i

i i

I i ill

10s

i

i

i

i i iiii

106

I

i

i i

it

10z

Pe

1

F I G U R E 9 P e x v a r i a n c e ( - - ) and Cm.x/~e (---) versus Pe: (O) Fer; ([El)AIb. Remaining c o m p u t a t i o n a l p a r a m e t e r s are as specified in Figure 4.

are summarized here using the notation of related works on the dynamics of electrophoretic separations. 13,17 Because dissociation-association reactions are fast compared with the mass transport, ion concentrations are constrained by a coupled set

s4

T.L. SOUNART et al. 1600

1200 Nonuniform

~_~800 0 400 Uni

0.30

0.31

x (d'less)

i

FIGURE 10 Steady-state concentration versus position obtained f r o m nonuniform and uniform computational grids. T h e protein is ferritin and Pe -- l07, Each calculation uses 1001 nodes to discretize the spatial domain x ~ [0, I]. The nonuniform mesh was generated with T-- 10 in Equation (5-223) of Anderson. I'

of mass-action relations. These include the dissociation of water, viz. Kw-= [H+][OH-] = 10-14M 2,

(12)

and the ion dissociation-association equilibria for M solutal components. If the neutral form of the kth component A~ is protonated or deprotonated to form Pk cations and N k anions, then the mass-action relations for ions of valence z are A~ a H++A~ -1,

z=-Nk l,-Nk+2,...,+Pk k = 1, 2 , . . . , M

which are characterized by the equilibrium constants

K~=

[H+]n~-~ n~ '

{z = - N k + l , - N k + 2 , . . . , + P k k = 1, 2 , . . . , M

(13)

where n~ is the concentration of subspecies A~. Local neutrality prevails on length scales large compared with ~1, the Debye screening length,

3

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

55

and thus for IEF, M

0 = ~ZkCk+[H+]

Kw [H+]

(14)

k=l

where CA is the concentration and ZAis the effective valence of the kth component, i.e., +PA

CA----~ n~, k = l , 2 , . . . , M

(15)

z = -N k

and _

ZA--

~-'+Pk gn~ /_...,z = - N k

CA

, k=l, 2,...,M

(16)

To account for local variations of the solutal concentrations, a mass balance is written for each component, viz. aCk at = - v . fk = - v .

[ ( ~ E + v)Ck--DkVCk],

k=l, 2,...,M

(17)

where t is the time, v the fluid velocity, E = -V~O the local electric field, and D A--(OAkBT the diffusivity, with kBT being the Boltzmann temperature and r the electric potential; fA, (~ and fi~ are, respectively, the flux, the hydrodynamic mobility (taken here to be independent of component sub-speciation), and the effective electrophoretic mobility of component k. If Mp denotes the number of protein species,

[~e - - [[fl~k)/(l+~k)]e~k(oA, k

e~k(Ok,

k = 1, 2 , . . . , Mp (18) k = Mp + 1, Mp + 2 , . . . , M

where e is the charge on a proton (1.6 x 10-19C), and a A the (Stokes) radius of protein k; f(wak) is Henry's f function. 18 The motion of the aqueous electrolyte is governed by the NavierStokes equations for incompressible flow, i.e., p -~-+v.Vv

]

= -Vp+~tV2v+e0eV~ .VV~ v. v - 0

(19) (20)

where p, ~t, and e are the fluid density, viscosity, and relative permittivity, respectively; p is the pressure and e0 is the permittivity of free space. The last term on the RHS of Equation (19) accounts for the electrical (Maxwell) stresses.

s6

T.L. SOUNART et al.

Since charge must be conserved, the governing equations are closed by combining the ion balances to obtain an equation for $, viz. V. (o'Vr

iD

=-ekBTV.( ~cokVzkCk+a~V[H+]--OJoHKwV[H+] -~) (21) k=l

where a = e2

Z~c0kCk+ ." Z~mkCk+%[H+]+C0oH [H § 1 -]-/ca k

(22)

k=Mp+ 1

is the local electrical conductivity and iD is the diffusion current density, implicitly defined in Equation (21); z~ is the mean square valence of the kth component, i.e., m

8-

~-' + Pk g 2n z /2~z=-Nk k

~

,

k = 1, 2 , . . . , M

(23)

Note that for components that may undergo many protonation or deprotonation reactions (e.g., proteins), dissociation-association equilibrium constants are not necessarily available. In such cases, subspecies concentrations are not calculated and, in place of Equations (16) and (23), effective and mean square valences are determined from titration data 8 (e.g., Table 1).

B. Initial and Boundary Conditions Electroosmosis is often suppressed in IEF separations to eliminate dispersion from fluid motion in the inherently non-uniform electrolytes, a9 Consequently, all boundary conditions on the fluid velocity approach zero, and v vanishes in the separation channel. Initial conditions for the ionic concentrations are approximately cross-sectionally uniform, and so for electrically insulating channel walls, E has no transverse component. Cross-sectional uniformity is thus maintained throughout the separation, so typically the problem formulation need only be solved in one spatial (axial) dimension. If x is the axial coordinate, then for a constant voltage separation, the boundary conditions on O(x, t) are r

t)- V

~(L, t)=0

(24) (25)

where V is the applied potential and L is the separation channel length. Initial and boundary conditions on the component concentrations vary with IEF technique, and will be discussed for each simulation presented in section III.

3

57

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

C. Numerical Implementation The general electrophoresis model described above is solved here numerically for several IEF separation conditions applied in practice. Equation (17) is solved in the axial spatial dimension using the fifthorder-accurate Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg (RKF) algorithm for the time step and a second-order central spatial discretization. The solution of this equation is coupled to the remainder of the balance laws, which must be solved at each time step. In one dimension, Equation (21) reduces to an explicit expression for the electric field, viz. E =

i-i D G

(26)

where E and io are the axial components of E and iD, respectively, and i is the current density given by i=

V L f0 l/or(x, t)~x

(27)

The derivatives in iD are calculated with second-order central finite differences, and the integral in Equation (27) is numerically integrated with a simple trapezoidal rule. These and the algebraic equations (12)-(16) are solved at each step in the RKF algorithm for Equation (17). This numerical scheme has been discussed at length elsewhere, s,~6

III. ILLUSTRATIVE SIMULATIONS OF IEF Commercial IEF buffers consist of dozens of amphoteric compounds with isoelectric points (pI) spanning the pI range of the analytes to be focused. If an initially uniform IEF buffer is confined in an electric field, a pH gradient is established as the ampholytes migrate to their pI. The buffer is confined in practice either by a closed column or more commonly by bounding the ampholytes between a strong acid and a strong base. To illustrate IEF buffer concentration evolution during pH gradient formation, IEF is first simulated with a simple eight-component buffer. Each component has two pK values with ApK = 2, mobility ec0k = 3.0 x 10 -4 cm2/V s, and pI values ranging from 3 to 10 in increments of 1. V= 500V, L = 5cm, all concentrations are initially uniform at 2.78 mM, and the column ends are impermeable to the buffer. These conditions approximate a closed channel filled with the ampholytes the ends or, an open channel with each end submerged in electrode reservoirs of strong acid and base. The time evolution of the pH and buffer distribution are shown in Figure 11. At the initial pH of 6.5, half the ampholytes are positively charged and half are negative, and so half initially migrate toward the anode and half toward the cathode (panel a). The positive

58

T.L. SOUNART et al. 560

' ' '

'

I

' ' ' '

I ' ' ' '

I ' ' ' '

I '

' '

'

5 min

51

480

4

I

400

I

320

v

E

o

~

240

2

I

__l

YJ

I

I

41

C;:F:t--F:;:5-9~

Jt

~

1.5 160

5--r-r-r-y

1

0.5

Shift = 80 mM

; , , ,

0 (a)

1

2

3 x (cm)

4

5

0 (b)

0.5 min

Shift = 4 u n i t s ,

I

1

,,

, ,

I

, ,

, ,

2

I

3

J,

,

,

I ,

4

, ,

,

1 5

x (cm)

F I G U R E I I Dynamics of IEF buffer composed of eight carrier ampholytes with pl = 3-10, L~pK= 2, and e0Jk - 3.0x 10-4cml/Vs: (a) ampholyte concentrations; (b) pH. V - 500 V; L - 5 cm. All concentrations are initially uniform at 2.78 mM, and column ends are impermeable to the buffer. Dotted line represents the initial field. Plots are shifted as noted for clarity. Anode is to the left.

species leave the region near the anode as the negative species accumulate, and the charge is balanced by an increase in hydrogen ions. This shifts the equilibrium of the negative species towards their neutral state, reducing the effective mobility. Electromigration and thus accumulation stops when the pI is reached, so the most acidic component ( p I - 3) builds up on the anode until the pH is 3. The component of pI - 4 is then forced to accumulate in a zone adjacent to this component because the charge of the pI - 4 component changes sign in the region of pH = 3, and so on for each ampholyte in the pI series. Therefore as the more acidic/basic species migrate toward the anode/cathode and accumulate in successive zones, the pH decreases/increases (panel b) in steps as the pI is approached for each component, at which point electromigration ceases and a steadystate distribution is established. The nonlinear coupling between the

3

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

.~

transport of each component and the electric field and pH leads to a complicated approach to steady state involving two zones for each component converging into one. Because only eight components comprise this IEF buffer, the pH gradient is not continuous. The channel is divided into eight stationary zones of equal length, with each zone composed of a uniform plug of each neutral ampholyte. In the commercial IEF buffers used in practice, a continuous and approximately linear pH gradient forms because a sufficient number of ampholytes are included to create zones of length scale of the order of the characteristic diffusion length; the continuum results from many overlapping Gaussian-shaped ampholyte zones. Mao et al. 2~ demonstrated that the behavior of Pharmalyte 3-10 can be predicted reasonably well with a buffer composed of 140 ampholytes of A p K - 2, eco k = 3.0 • 10 -4 r and pI values ranging from 3 to 9.95 in increments of 0.05. Here we simulate the dynamics of 2% Pharmalyte 3-10 in the same electric field and channel as described above, with 141 of the same ampholytes (pI values from 3-10). All ampholyte concentrations are initially uniform at 0.16 mM. Results are presented in Figure 12. The pH evolves as for the eight component buffer, but the distribution is continuous (panel a). The dual-peak approach to steady-state ampholyte distributions is clearly seen in the focusing of ampholyte 71 (panel b). Each peak has the same height because this is the central ampholyte, and transport in the column is approximately symmetric. The ampholytes closer to the column ends are focused essentially at one peak during most of the development, with only very small secondary peaks forming transiently. Note that although a steady-state buffer distribution has not quite been realized in 5 min, the linear pH distribution has been formed. The conductivity is diminished as the pI of each carrier ampholyte is approached and charge carriers are depleted (panel c). This occurs initially at the channel ends where accumulation/depletion of ampholytes begins, and propogates towards the center of the column with time. The electric field scales inversely on cr (panel d, Equation (26)), increasing where charge is depleted to satisfy electroneutrality. The magnitude of the proportionality between E and 1 / a diminishes however, as the current density is reduced by a factor of 4 during IEF buffer focusing (Figure 16). This occurs because of the increase in channel resistance as the ampholytes are neutralized at their pI. The current thus provides a sensitive metric for pH gradient development, and shows an approximate steady state after about 5 min~the time required to produce a linear pH gradient. The dynamics of the electric field distribution (Figure 12d) is key to understanding the dual-peak migration toward focused ampholyte zones. As charge is initially depleted at the channel ends, the electric field increases there and decreases in the center. The ampholytes thus migrate toward their pI from high-field regions at the ends to a low-field region in the center, leading to immediate accumulation into peaks at the channel

60

T.L. S O U N A R T

, ' " , , , i

. . . .

i

. . . .

i

. . . .

....

i

i

9

70

#20

60

~

i

i

i

?

Am#Z1 5 min

et al.

#120A

j~

8

7

'E 4o

I

J

6

3O

~,

5

3

k L_

~_

'''|

0

1

....

| .... 2

i

|''' 3

i ....

i ....

i ....

i ....

~

iJ~

-Jl

Shift= 10 m M

.L 5

0

......... 1

0.5 . . . . . 2

(b) ,

0.6

1.s

"

| .... 4

x(cm)

(a)

~

,,

3

4

3

4

I

j,~

x(cm)

450

i , 400

0.5

o

t

-

--

t 350

0.4

0.5

2

300 E'250

0.3

LU

200

0.2 150

0.1

0.0

(c)

100

0

1

2

3

x(cm)

4

50

5

(d)

0

1

2

5

x(crn)

F I G U R E 12 Simulation of 2% Pharmalyte 3-10 carrier buffer focusing: (a) pH; (b) selected carrier ampholytes 20, 71,120; (c) conductivity; (d) electric field (magnitude) at selected times 0, 0.5, I, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5 min. Carrier buffer is composed of 14 I ampholytes with Z~oK = 2 and eeJk = 3.0x 10 -4 cmZ/V s and pl = 3-10. All ampholyte concentrations are initially uniform at 0.16 mM. All other conditions as in Figure I I.

ends regardless of their pI values. The peak heights begin to diminish with time because as the ampholytes migrate, the electric field disturbances propagate toward the center of the channel, and the field gradient diminishes. As the ampholytes get closer to their pI, their transport becomes dominated more by pH variations than electric field variations, and they are ultimately immobilized in a single concentrated zone at the isoelectric point.

3

61

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

If dilute analytes are included in an IEF buffer, they are separated as they focus at their pI in the developing pH gradient. Because the analytes are dilute relative to the carrier buffer, they are essentially uncoupled from the electric field and other ionic transport. Figure 13 shows the focusing of five amphoteric dyes in the Pharmalyte buffer and channel just described. The initial uniform concentration of each dye is 1 ~tM, and the relevant properties of each dye are provided in Table 2. In Figure 13a, the time evolution of two dyes (D1 and D2) of the same electrophoretic mobility are shown. D2 focuses faster and sharper than D1 because it has a lower ApK, and as such it is fully dissociated over a larger pH range. The effective mobility of this analyte increases sharply away from the pI, leading to efficient focusing and high resolution. Figure 13b shows the dynamics of two dyes (D3 and D4) with ApK = 5.5. The D4 zone is spread over almost a full pH unit and requires 80 min to focus because of

700

,

,

,

,

I

,

,

,

,

i

,

,

,

,

i

,

,

,

,

,

D1

,

,

,

160 -

D2

' '

'

'

'

i

,

80 min

600

20 min

,

,

i

,

,

i

,

,

,

,

i '

140 _ ,2

'

'

't

A

A

t .........

120

400 - lo v

,

,...

oo

500

,

03 .,'- ~ 4 /" 'x..............."

:::L

~ o

o

1

,oo

40

8o

20

, / \ ............

-- . . . . . . . . . . . . .

300

200 40

100

(a)

4

~

t,-'

4

L

D2

D1 DI ", ,2,~ ....... ~ . . . . . L,, 0 1 2 3 4 x (cm)

",. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

~

20

0

(b)

0

1

2

3 X (cm)

4

5

FIGURE 13 Focusing of four amphoteric dyes in 2% Pharmalyte 3-10:(a) two dyes (D I, D2) with &pK <3, e(0k = 3.0 x l0 -4 cm2/Vs; (b) two dyes (D3, D4) with &pK = 5, ec0K - 3.0 ( - - ) and 1.0 ( ..... ) x 10 -4 cmZ/V s. All dye concentrations are initially uniform at I llM. All other conditions as in Figure 12.

62

T.L. SOUNART et al. TABLE

2

Physicochemical parameters for non-linear simulations e~

Component

pK I

pI 5.30 dye (D1)

3.70

6.90

3.0

20

pI 8.60 dye (D2)

7.68

9.52

3.0

20

pI 6.75 dye (D3)

4.02

9.49

1.0

21

pI 6.75 dye (D4)

5.01

10.50

3.0

21

H3PO 4 Na +

2.00

3.67 5.19

20 8

36.27 19.87

8 8

H+ OH-

pK z

(I 0 -4 cm2/V s)

Reference

the high Apk values. D3 has not been separated even after 80 min because the electrophoretic mobility is a factor of 3 lower than that of D4. The efficacy of IEF is reduced as the analyte ApK increases and the electrophoretic mobility decreases. Note that during the dual-peak approach to steady state, the peaks are initially sharper and more concentrated than in the focused peak. This results from the transient initial increase in the electric field (three times the average) near the channel ends (Figure 12b) as described previously. In Figure 14, IEF separation of three proteins is demonstrated. The initial uniform concentration of hemoglobin (H), albumin (A), and ferritin (F) is 1 l.tM, and input parameters are listed in Table 1. All proteins are separated, including albumin and ferritin, which have pIs differing only by 0.3 units. Hemoglobin is focused first (8 min), followed by albumin (20min), and finally ferritin (40min). The breadth of the zones and final concentration follows the same ordering, with hemoglobin concentrated by a factor of 400rathe most of all analytes (including the dyes). The ordering of the focusing efficacy follows the ordering of the mobilities of the proteins (Table 1), and may also be influenced by the distribution of pK values. In practice, an IEF focusing space is often created by bounding the carrier ampholytes and analytes in a channel between regions of strong acid and base. 2~ This technique is simpler to implement than a closed channel, and has been employed in capillary IEF (CIEF) to transport a small mobile focusing space along a capillary to a detector, in a protocol similar to capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) or isotachophoresis (ITP). 23 To demonstrate this technique, an IEF separation is simulated in 2% Pharmalyte bounded by H3PO 4 at the anode and NaOH at the cathode in a 2 cm open channel at 200 V. The initial condition is shown in Figure 15a. H3PO 4 (100 mM) fills the first 0.5 cm of the anodic end of the channel, and 40mM NaOH fills 0.5 cm of the cathodic end, leaving a focusing space of length Lf = i cm in the center of the channel. The 141

3

63

THEORY AND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING 3200

'

'

'

'

I

'

I

F A

AI

:3o 20

2000

v

'JH

40min A A

2800

2400

' '

10

1600

~

o 1200

A

800

400

4

/

A

F

A

H

F

F 2

0 ..... 0

F

A

~,

I 1

....

H

~,

I

,

2

,

,

,

i

3

i

A ~1

HF"

i~,,i

~.

4

x (cm) F I G U R E 14 Focusing of three proteins (hemoglobin H, albumin A, ferritin F) in 2% Pharmalyte 3 - 1 0 . A l l protein concentrations are initially uniform at I l l M . A l l other conditions as in Figure 12.

ampholytes representing Pharmalyte 3-10 (0.16mM), the dyes D1 and D2 (1 pM), and the three proteins (1 ~tM) initially fill the center i cm of the channel. Figure 15a shows the transient behavior of the carrier electrolytes. The strong electrolyte zones bounding the IEF buffer create impermeable barriers for the ampholytes because the electrophoretic velocity of even those with the lowest and highest pI reverses direction (from sign change) upon entering the low and high pH regions, respectively. The inset in Figure 15a, shows the ampholyte with p I - 3.0 (lowest) building up at the position of the strong-acid zone boundary. The focusing space behavior is essentially the same as for impermeable column ends (cf. Figure 12), but the strong acid and (particularly) base zones migrate slightly, causing the focusing space to drift during separation. 24

64

T.L. SOUNART et al. 120 ~

100

1

~-t

8

I

~" i

C a r r i e r

( L o w e s t

'

'

'

i

,

,

,

|

,

,

,

|

,

,

,

!

,

,

,

|

,

i

,

#1

A m p h o l y t e

pl)

0.4 rain. ~ . . . ~

80 O 0.4

#71

60

. . . . . . . . . . . 0.6 0.8 1.0

/

x(cm)

t---

[0.6min 40

I i

o.2

20

0

(a)

,

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

.

0.4

x(cm)

,

i

,

,

,

0.6

i

,

,

,

0.8

i

,

,

,

1.0

i

,

,

,

1.2

,

,

1.4

1.6

x(cm)

(b) 1200 I , , , i ,

, , ~ , , , ~ , , , ~ , , , ~,

Shift 100 V/cm =

0.5

1000

0.4

800

J

E ---. 0.3

o .....

C/)

E

v b

600

u.I 0.2

j

400

200

0.0

(c)

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

x(cm)

1.2

1.4

0 0.4

1.6

(d)

.

i

0.6

,

,

,

I

0.8

,

,

.

i

,

,

1.0

,

i

1.2

,

.

.

!

1.4

,

,~ 1.6

x(cm)

FIGURE 15 2% Pharmalyte 3-10 focusing space bounded by strong acid H3PO 4 and base N a O H . (a) Buffer zones at selected times O, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 min. Concentration of H3PO 4 and N a O H on left axis, ampholyte 71 on right axis; inset shows ampholyte I at 0.2 (---) and 0.6 ( - - ) min. (b) pH; (c) conductivity; (d) electric field (magnitude) at selected times in the range 0-0.4 min in increments of 0.05 min. L --- 2 cm; V - 200 V; column ends are open to H3PO 4 and N a O H reservoirs. All carrier ampholyte concentrations are initially uniform at 0.16 m M between x - - 0 . 5 and 1.5 cm, and zero elsewhere. All other conditions as in Figure 12.

The migration of the NaOH zone also creates a dip in the conductivity (panel c) and a peak in the electric field (panel d) near that boundary. After 3s, the electric field near the NaOH zone boundary is over five times the field in the central plateau region where the buffer concentrations are still uniform.

3

65

THEORYAND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

,0

'

'

'

'

I

'

'

'

'

I

'

'

'

'

'1

'

O.8 ,~, o

0.6 "~ 0.4 0.2 0.0

. . . . . . . 0

' 1

. . . .

' 2

. . . .

' 3

. . . .

te mpV/L2 F I G U R E 16 IEF current density kinetics for 2% Pharmalyte 3-10 in closed channel ( - - ) and bounded by strong acid and base in open channel (---). All conditions for closed channel are as in Figure 12; open channel as in Figure 15. cr0 is the initial conductivity of 2% Pharmalyte 3-10, and ec0k= 3.0 x 10-4 cm2/Vs is the mobility of the Pharmalyte ampholytes.

Comparison of Figure 12 and 15 shows that in this simulation, the pH gradient develops an order of magnitude faster than in the closed column simulation. The faster separation is obtained because the channel is shorter and the average field in the focusing space is higher; the focusing time scales on L'~/(ecokV), which is a factor of ten higher in the closed channel simulation. Note that the scaled current density decay is similar to that in the closed column when plotted against non-dimensional time (focusing time scale) (Figure 16). Figure 17 shows the IEF separation of five analytes in the 2% Pharmalyte buffer bounded by H3PO 4 and NaOH. Analyte focusing behavior is similar to that in the closed channel (cf. Figures 13 and 14), with essential differences resulting only from the shorter focusing space and higher electric field. The focusing time for all analytes is reduced by an order of magnitude because of the order of magnitude reduction in L~/(eco~V). Although separation is faster, dispersion of the focused zones is greater because the Peclet number is 60% lower, resulting in broader, shorter peaks (here Pe = e V/kT, which is equivalent to the definition offered with respect to Eq. (11)). The focused analyte peak heights in the

66

T.L. SOUNART et al. 240 220

'

'

'

'

!

I

0.6 min

'

H 500

'

'

I

'

'

'

I

2 min

'

'

'

I

'

'

'

H

200

180 160

A ii

140 120

t

D2

i

i ii

F ,.

i i/~j! A ! i

i

D1

,

~l !!1

0.4 rain

400 D2

A

D1 300

100

1 min 200 -

:: II ::

:.11

ii

~

II

, II

.~

i

i" .......".~:~~_.&+-.-~..~ .... i/ ........... 0.2 min

lOO -

' ::i

o 0.5

(a)

ii

Jl

..

Ii .~

ii

. . . . .

1.0

x (cm)

o 0.6

1.5

(b)

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

x(cm)

F I G U R E 17 Two dyes and t h r e e proteins focused between strong acid H 3 P O 4 and base N a O H : (a) 0.2-0.6 min; (b) I - 2 min. All analyte concentrations are initially unif o r m at I IIM between x - - 0 . 5 and 1.5 cm, and zero elsewhere. All o t h e r conditions as in Figure 15.

open channel are all about 45% lower than in the closed channel-slightly more dispersed than the 36% predicted by scaling on ~/Pe. There is additional dispersion in the open channel because the electric field peak near the NaOH zone boundary persists (Figure 15), which reduces the field in the remainder of the focusing space. IEF resolution is reduced slightly in open-channel electrolyte configurations because of the migration of the catholyte.

IV. S U M M A R Y

IEF is an electrophoretic process that hinges on the mobility versus pH behavior of ampholytes. The basic theory of IEF tells us that separands focus about their pI in a Gaussian distribution. Peak height and variance depend on the competition between diffusion away from the pI and

3

THEORY AND SIMULATION OF ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

67

electromigration towards it. Comprehensive simulations of IEF involve the numerical solution to conservation laws for all the relevant amphoteric and ionogenic species in the separations milieu. The conservation relations are non-linearly coupled to the driving electric field and through the complicated mass-action relations. With the increased speed of microprocessors, one-dimensional simulations of the type shown here are now readily managed. The simulations offer the possibility of gaining insight into the detailed dynamics of the unfolding separations process. To see a more comprehensive exposition of IEF simulation results, particularly with regard to pH gradient development, the reader should refer the monograph by Mosher et al. (8) REFERENCES 1. Kolin, A.J. Separation and concentration of proteins in a pH field combined with an electric field. Chem. Phys. 22:1628, 1954. 2. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. 1. Differential equation of solute concentrations at a steady state and its solution for simple cases. Acta Chem. Scan. 15:325, 1961. 3. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. 2. Buffering capacity and conductance of isoionic ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scan. 16:456, 1962. 4. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. 3. Description of apparatus for electrolysis in columns stabilized by density gradients and direct determination of isoelectric points. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (Suppl. 1):132, 1962. 5. Vesterberg, O. and Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. 4. Further studies on resolving power in connection with separation of myoglobins. Acta Chem. Scan. 20:820, 1966. 6. Vesterberg, O. Synthesis and isoelectric fractionation of carrier ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scan. 23:2653, 1969. 7. Rilbe, H. Historical and theoretical aspects of isoelectric focusing, in Isoelectric Focusing and Isotachophoresis, (Catsimpoolas, N. Ed.) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., New York, NY, Vol. 209, pp. 11-22, 1973. 8. Mosher R. A., Saville D. A. and Thormann, W. The Dynamics of Electrophoresis. VCH, Weinheim, 1992. 9. Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH Gradients, Theory and Methodology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990. 10. Boris, J. P. and Book, D. L. Flux-corrected transport m minimum-error finite-difference method for solving fluid equations. J. Comp. Phys. 18:608, 1973. 11. Anderson, D. A. Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. Hemisphere Publ. Co., New York, 1984. 12. Heinrich, J. C. and Pepper, D. W. Intermediate Finite Element Method. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 1999. 13. Sounart, T. L. and Baygents, J. C. Simulation of electrophoretic separations by the fluxcorrected transport method. J. Chromatogr. A. 890:321, 2000. 14. Bier, M., Palusinski, O. A., Mosher R. A. and Saville, D. A. Electrophoresis mathematical modeling and computer simulation. Science. 219:1281, 1983. 15. Saville D. A. and Palusinski, O. A. Theory of electrophoretic separations. Part I: formulation of a mathematical model. AIChE J. 32:207, 1986.

68

T.L. SOUNART et al.

16. Palusinski, O. A., Graham, A., Mosher, R. A., Bier, M. and Saville, D. A. Theory of electrophoretic separations. Part II: construction of a numerical simulation scheme and its applications. AIChE ]. 32:215, 1986. 17. Sounart T. L. and Baygents, J. C. Simulatiion of electrophoretic separation: effect of numerical and molecular diffusion on pH calculations in poorly buffered systems. Electrophoresis 21:2287, 2000. 18. Henry, D. C. The cataphoresis of suspended particles. Part I. The equation of cataphoresis. Proc. Roy. $oc. London Ser. A. 133:106, 1933. 19. Sounart, T. L. and Baygents, J. C. Electrically-driven fluid motion in channels with streamwise gradients in the electrical conductivity. Colloids Surf A. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 195:59, 2001. 20. Mao, Q., Pawliszyn, J. and Thormann, W. Dynamics of capillary isoelectric focusing in the absence of fluid flow: high-resolution computer simulation and experimental validation with whole column imaging. Anal. Chem. 72:5493, 2000. 21. Schmitt, Ph., Poiger, T., Simon, R., Freitag, D., Kettrup, A. and Garrison, A. W. Simultaneous determination of ionization constants and isoelectric points of 12 hydroxy-s-triazines by capillary zone electrophoresis and capillary isoelectric focusing. Anal. Chem. 69:2559, 1997. 22. Thormann, W., Molteni, S., Stoffel, E., Mosher R. A. and Chmelik, J. Computer modeling and experimental validation of the dynamics of capillary isoelectric focusing with electroosmotic zone displacement. Anal. Meth. and Instrum. 1:177, 1993. 23. Thormann, W., Zhang, C.-X., Caslavska, J., Gebauer P. and Mosher, R. A. Modeling of the impact of ionic strength on the electroosmotic flow in capillary electrophoresis with uniform and discontinuous buffer systems. Anal. Chem. 70:549, 1998. 24. Mosher, R. A. and Thormann, W. High-resolution computer simulation of the dynamics of isoelectric focusing using carrier ampholytes: the post-separation stabilizing phase revisited. Electrophoresis 23:1803, 2002.

4

GENERATION OF pH GRADIENTS TOM BERKELMAN

Life Science Group, Bio-Rad Laboratories, 6000 James Watson Drive, Hercules, CA 9454 7

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX.

INTRODUCTION pH GRADIENTS IN THE EARLY HISTORY OF IEF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIERAMPHOLYTES PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CARRIER AMPHOLYTE-GENERATED pH GRADIENTS LIMITATIONS OF THE CARRIER AMPHOLYTE METHOD EARLYALTERNATIVE IEF MODES NOT REQUIRING CARRIER AMPHOLYTES IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS USE OF IMMOBILIZED BUFFERS IN PREPARATIVE IEF PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Isoelectric focusing (IEF) is the electrophoretic separation of proteins in a pH gradient. The pH gradient is therefore critical to the technique and the nature of the pH gradient largely determines the quality and usefulness of the separation. Since its early inception, the technique of IEF has seen improvements in resolution, reproducibility, speed, capacity, and overall applicability, most of which have been made possible by refinements in pH gradient generation. The different IEF methods that have been developed over the years are largely distinguished from one another in terms of the means which by the pH gradient is formed. The pH gradient should fulfill a number of requirements to be useful for IEF separations. The pH gradient should be reproducible so that the results of separations can be compared with one another. This means that it should be stable with respect to time and other external factors. The shape, slope, and range of the pH gradient should be controllable, so that a pH gradient appropriate to the separation can be generated. The pH gradient should be continuous, as this largely determines the resolution of the separation. Finally, the pH gradient should exist in a medium that 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

69

70

T. BERKELMAN

provides sufficient conductivity for electrophoretic separation and that ensures the solubility and stability of the proteins to be separated. Other factors may be important in certain situations and are determined by the scale of the separation, whether the separation is preparative or analytical, and how the results of the separation are to be analyzed. The pH gradient used for IEF can either be "artificial" or "natural." Svensson, an early developer of the technique of IEF, first articulated this distinction, 1 which has subsequently proved useful in understanding the different types of pH gradients used for IEE An "artificial" pH gradient arises from a gradient in the composition of a solution of acids and bases that is created prior to the application of an electric field. This type of gradient is formed either by the diffusive mixing of a relatively basic solution juxtaposed with a relatively acidic solution, or by the controlled creation of a gradient between two solutions by the use of a gradient mixer. A "natural" pH gradient arises solely through the action of electrical current passing through a solution that is homogeneous prior to application of the current. Establishment of the pH gradient is the result of the same electrochemical processes that drive protein separation. Such gradients have their origin in the electrolysis of water. The solution at the anode becomes acidic due to the electrolytic production of H + and the solution at the cathode becomes basic due to the production of OH-. This results in a pH gradient that can be used for IEF if measures are taken to assure its uniformity, stability, and reproducibility. Both "artificial" and "natural" pH gradients depend on buffering compounds for the maintenance of the gradient and as charge carriers.

II. pH GRADIENTS IN THE EARLY HISTORY OF IEF IEF can be said to have had its inception in 1912, when Ikeda and Suzuki 2 patented a method for the purification of glutamic acid from a protein hydrolysate. The hydrolysate was placed in a cell comprising three compartments separated by permeable membranes. When an electric current was passed through the cell, it was observed that acidic amino acids accumulated in the compartment closest to the anode, basic amino acids in the compartment closet to the cathode, and neutral amino acids in the middle compartment. Over subsequent decades, this general method was applied to protein hydrolysates and other samples. These experiments used multichamber electrolyzers in which permeable membranes or siphons separated the chambers from each another. When a sample mixture was introduced into such a device, and a current run through it, amphoteric constituents of the sample separated and accumulated in individual compartments in increasing order of isoelectric point from anode to cathode. This method was eventually extended from the separation of amino acids

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

71

and other amphoteric small molecules to separations of peptides and proteins. Reports on this general method are numerous and covered comprehensively in a review by Svensson. 3 Although these separations were not IEF in the modern sense, they were undertaken with an understanding of the general principle that proteins and other ampholytes will move under the influence of an electric field until they arrive at the pH zone, where they carry no net charge. 4 In these early experiments, the pH gradient was "natural" in that it arose solely through the action of electrical current on water. The pH in any intermediate chamber was a consequence of the buffering power that was imparted by the ampholyte accumulating in that chamber. These experiments thus foreshadowed the use of carrier ampholytes to generate pH gradients, but provided neither the resolution nor the reproducibility of later technical refinements. Early examples of "artificial" pH gradients appeared in the 1950s with descriptions of electrophoretic separations of proteins in applied gradients of buffer either in density gradients s-7 or on paper strips. 8 These pH gradients were prepared using two different buffers and through simple diffusion. The time scale of these separations was rapid (of the order of minutes), and it was noted that the separation patterns were not stable over time. This was no doubt a consequence of the fact that the buffers used to prepare the pH gradient were themselves electrically charged and mobile within the electric field used to drive the separation. In fact, any pH gradient prepared using charged buffers suffers from this problem. Subsequent developments in isoelectric focusing were largely the result of efforts to overcome this fundamental limitation. i11. THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AMPHOLYTES

The development of synthetic carrier ampholytes was the first breakthrough that allowed the formation of pH gradients fulfilling everything required to be used routinely for highly resolving lEE Their development depended in turn on the elucidation of a comprehensive theory of ampholyte-generated pH gradients that pre-dated the introduction of synthetic carrier ampholytes by several years. Svensson presented this theory in a series of papers published in the early 1960s. l'9'l~ This work was the first to introduce the term "carrier ampholyte." The term ampholyte refers to any molecule with a defined isoelectric point resulting from the presence of both basic and acidic functional groups. The term "carrier ampholyte" distinguishes the ampholytes whose purpose is in generating and maintaining the pH gradient from the ampholytes (proteins) that are to be separated by IEE They are called "carrier ampholytes" because they function to carry charge and buffering power.

72

T. BERKELMAN

Svensson recognized that the "artificial" pH gradients used at the time for protein separations were severely limited by their instability and that proteins can never be expected to reach stable focusing positions in such a gradient. He demonstrated theoretically that a series of ampholytes with isoelectric points distributed over the pH range of interest would form a stable and continuous pH gradient in an electric field. When an electric field is applied across a solution of ampholytes, the ampholytes acquire a positive charge as they approach the anode and a negative charge as they approach the cathode. The charged ampholytes are repelled from the electrodes and at some point in the middle of the electric field they lose their charge and stop migrating. The final position of each individual ampholyte is determined by its isoelectric point. The more basic ones accumulate toward the cathode and the more acidic ones accumulate toward the anode. The final shape of the pH gradient depends on the isoelectric points of the ampholytes, their concentrations, and buffering properties. The work of Svensson describes, in mathematical terms, the steady state between diffusion and focusing and demonstrates that such pH gradients are stable in an electric field. It is demonstrated that the steadystate concentration distribution of ampholytes in an electric field is a series of overlapping Gaussian curves, one for each ampholyte, ascending in order by isoelectric point from anode to cathode. It is also shown that the complete separation of two proteins by IEF requires the presence of at least one carrier ampholyte with a pI value intermediate between those of the proteins to be separated. This finding has important implications for the design of synthetic carrier ampholyte mixtures. The resolution of the separation depends on the number of different carrier ampholyte species present. Carrier ampholyte mixtures should therefore contain as many different ampholyte species as possible. Svensson described the properties that a good carrier ampholyte should possess. A stable pH gradient requires high buffer capacity, and effective separation requires high conductivity. Both conditions are satisfied by ampholytes that buffer well at their isoelectric points. A good ampholyte therefore contains at least one basic or acidic group with a p K a close to its isoelectric point. Ideally, the pI of the ampholyte should be intermediate between two closely spaced p K a values. Carrier ampholytes should also be small molecules so that they may be separated from proteins following separation, and they should have little or no optical absorbance at wavelengths where proteins typically absorb. A few such compounds were available at the time the study was published, but their number was limited and there were large portions of the pH continuum for which few good ampholytes existed. In the pH range 4-7, no available ampholytes could be identified for which the difference between the pI and the closest p K a value was less than 1. 9 IEF in ampholyte-generated pH gradients was first attempted using peptides derived from protein hydrolysates as the carrier ampholyte

4

73

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

mixture, l~ These mixtures had many of the properties that a carrier ampholyte mixture should have: they contained a large number of individual ampholyte species, many of which buffered well close to their pI. They also shared many of the properties of the proteins to be separated and could not easily be distinguished from the components of the sample. The principle of carrier ampholyte IEF (CA-IEF) could be demonstrated using peptide mixtures, but this did not lead to a useful analytical or preparative procedure. Therefore, there was a need for synthetic carrier ampholyte mixtures with the required properties, and this need had to be met before CA-IEF could become a robust and widely practiced technique. The synthetic problem at hand was an unconventional one from the perspective of a synthetic organic chemist. Whereas a synthetic procedure is usually designed to produce a pure compound in as high a yield as possible, carrier ampholytes need to be prepared with a procedure that results in as complex a mixture as possible. Such a synthesis was in fact developed shortly after the properties of an ideal carrier ampholyte mixture were described. In 1969, Versterberg ~1 described the bulk synthesis of a complex carrier ampholyte mixture that satisfied the criteria outlined by Svensson. A mixture of diamines and polyamines are reacted with acrylic acid. The amines condense with the unsaturated bond of the acrylic acid by Michael addition and the result is a complex mixture of polyamino polycarboxylic acids. Figure i shows the basic chemical scheme. The dissociation constants of the amines are distributed over a p K a range from 3 to 10. Varying numbers of carboxylic acid groups per ampholyte molecule balance the basic amine groups, resulting in a range of pI values also covering the pH range from 3 to 10. The p K a values of the amines for any given ampholyte are closely spaced, resulting in the high buffer capacity and conductivity predicted to be necessary for the generation of a stable pH gradient useful for IEE 9 These

R1-- NH2--(CH2)n-- NH2-- R2

"1"

polyamine R1-- NH§ (CH2)n-- NH2-- R2 I

H2C=CH--C\ . 0 acrylic acid

"i"

R1--NH§ (CH2)n-- NH§ R2 I

CH2

I OH 2 I

0

//C\ 0 .

FIGURE I

I

CH2

CH2

I OH 2 I

0

//C\o_.

I OH 2 I

0

etc.

//C\ 0 .

Chemical scheme for the synthesis of Ampholine ~TM carrier ampholytes.

~4

To BERKELMAN

carrier ampholytes also have the desirable properties of low optical absorbance at 280 nm and an average molecular weight well below that of most proteins. They are also very soluble in water. Although the synthetic procedure gives a carrier ampholyte mixture a broad pI range, narrower pH ranges can be prepared by isoelectric fractionation of the parent mixture. A patent was issued for this synthetic procedure 12 and the carrier ampholyte mixture was produced at various pH ranges and distributed by LKB Produkter, AB (now Amersham Biosciences) under the trade name AmpholineXM.13 This basic procedure was in time adopted, with variations, by other manufacturers in the production of their own carrier ampholyte mixtures (e.g., Bio-Lyte TM from Bio-Rad, Resolyte TM from BDH), most of which were similar to Ampholine T M in their general properties. There were also publications of straightforward syntheses of carrier ampholytes that utilized commercially available precursors in a synthetic scheme accessible to the laboratory researcher.~4,15 All start with a mixture of polyamines that contains a wide distribution of pK a values, which is treated to convert primary and secondary amines into tertiary amines with the addition of acidic functionality. One noteworthy variant of the basic Vesterberg scheme was described and patented by Grubhofer 16,17 and distributed by Serva Feinchemie GmbH under the brand name ServalytTM. This method starts with the usual polyamine mixture, and acidic functionality is provided by sulfonic and phosphonic acid moieties. Sulfonate groups are introduced into the ampholyte mixture through the reaction of propane sultone with amine, and phosphonate groups are added through the reaction of chloromethylene phosphonic acid with amine. The basic chemical scheme for this synthesis is shown in Figure 2. Although the primary purpose for the development of this synthesis was no doubt the circumvention of the Vesterberg patent, 12 this carrier ampholyte mixture has some attractive properties relative to the LKB product. Additional acidic functional groups give a more continuous and broader pH gradient, and the sulfonic and phosphonic acid groups in Servalyt TM do not chelate metal ions as has been observed in the case of AmpholineTM. 13 The one exception to the general scheme of adding acidic groups to polyamines came with the development of Pharmalyte TM carrier ampholytes, first patented and distributed by Pharmacia Fine Chemicals AB 18,19 (now Amersham Biosciences). This mixture was prepared by the co-polymerization of amines and amino acids with epichlorohydrin. In contrast with the syntheses described above, 11-17 in which a mixture of acids and bases containing a wide range of pK a values produces a mixture with a wide pI range, these carrier ampholytes are synthesized from starting materials that have a relatively narrow range of pK a values. This

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

75

~ /S\

R~-- NH 2 - (CH2)n-- NH 2 - R2

polyamine

propane sultone

R~-- NH+-- (CH2)n - NH2+ - R2 I OH 2 I OH 2 I OH 2 I

"{"

so;

polyamine

R~--NH+-- (CH2)n I CHa I OH2 I CHa I

so;

R 1- NH 2 - (CH2)n-- NH2+ - R2

HCI

HaC 0 \ / H2C-- CH 2

+

+

PO~-

Chemical

etc.

so;

CI--CH2-- p o 2-

chloromethylenephosphonicacid

R1-- NH+-- (CH2)n - NH2+ - R2 I CHa I

FIGURE 2

NH + - R2 I CH a I OH 2 I CH a I

schemes

~

R 1- NH+-- (CH2)n - NH + - R2 I I CHa CH2 I I

for the synthesis

POd

of Servalyt

Po~-

TM

etc.

carrier ampholytes.

assures good buffering capacity and yields carrier ampholytes with relatively narrow pH ranges (typically only about 2 pH units). Wider pH ranges are prepared by mixing together different narrow range mixtures. The manufacturer claims that this mixture contains more individual ampholyte species than are produced with the standard method and therefore provides a smoother, more highly resolving pH gradient.

IV. PRACTICALASPECTS OF CARRIERAMPHOLYTE-GENERATEDpH GRADIENTS The commercial availability of carrier ampholyte mixtures put the robust and straightforward separation technique of CA-IEF in the hands of researchers, and a number of near simultaneous reports of IEF separations were published as soon as Ampholine TM appeared in the market. 20-26 The practice of CA-IEF has many variations, most of which concern how the pH gradient is stabilized and whether the separation is analytical or preparative. Common features of the various CA-IEF methods include the use of carrier ampholytes at a concentration of 2-4% (w/v) and the use of anolyte and catholyte reservoirs that are typically at or beyond the pH extremes of the gradient. The use of anolyte and catholyte stabilizes the

76

T.

BERKELMAN

pH gradient by providing end points and restricting the ampholytes to the region where protein separation is to occur. Resolution of the technique depends on the electric field strength, so the technique is usually performed using instrumentation capable of delivering field strengths of 50 V/cm or higher. High field strengths result in Joule heating, so instrumentation that provides effective heat dissipation is essential. A means of gradient stabilization is required for CA-IEF because convective mixing otherwise abolishes any pH gradient. Carrier ampholyte-generated pH gradients have conductivity variations along the gradient and, consequently, variations along the gradient in the amount of Joule heat generated during IEE It is this non-homogeneous heat generation that can result in convective mixing. The earliest reported CA-IEF separations were performed in columns in which the pH gradient was stabilized with a sucrose density gradient. 27,28A sucrose gradient containing a homogeneous mixture of carrier ampholytes is poured into a glass column with the aid of a gradient mixer. Voltage is applied across the length of the column in a device that allows the venting of electrolysis gases that would otherwise disrupt the gradient. Many proteins will focus sharply under these conditions, and the relative simplicity of collecting fractions from such a device brought this technique early prominence as a preparative method. However, as proteins focus and concentrate, they form zones of higher density that destabilize the density gradient. Moreover, many proteins aggregate and precipitate as they focus. When this occurs, they sediment out of the gradient. These problems, as well as the difficulty of manufacturing the instrument, resulted in the decline of this technique. Instruments for preparative density gradient column IEF are no longer commercially available and the technique is rarely practiced. Other preparative modes of CA-IEF are, however, still widely used. The Rotofor TM instrument (Figure 3), available from Bio-Rad Laboratories, uses rotational stabilization. Rotating the column in which the separation is conducted prevents convective mixing and settling. 29,3~The separation column is divided into individual chambers by permeable membranes, and fractions are collected following separation by simultaneously evacuating all of the chambers. IEF is also performed in beds stabilized by granulated matrices such as Bio-GelTM P and SephadexTM.31,32 Collection of material following separation involves removing the medium from the zone of interest and eluting the protein from the matrix. Analytical CA-IEF was originally performed using polyacrylamide gel as the stabilizing matrix, 2~ and this remains the dominant method for analytical CA-lEE Polyacrylamide gels are easily prepared, and the resulting matrix is transparent and largely free of fixed charge. The gels can be cast as tubes or as slabs, which can be run either vertically or horizontally (Figure 3). Separated proteins can be visualized by staining; most commonly used staining methods (e.g., silver, Coomassie TM

4

GENERATION OF pH GRADIENTS

77

F I G U R E 3 Instrumentation used for various modes of CA-IEF: (a) Bio-Rad model I I I mini IEF cell for horizontal electrophoresis of IEF slab gels. (b) Bio-Rad model 175 tube cell for vertical electrophoresis of IEF tube gels. (c) Bio-Rad Rotofor cell for preparative CA-IEF with rotational stabilization. From Bio-Rad Laboratories with kind permission.

Blue, fluorescent stains) can be applied to CA-IEF gels with some modification. Agarose gels are also widely used for analytical CA-IEF,2s,37 as the larger pore size of agarose matrices allows the separation of larger proteins not amenable to separation in polyacrylamide. 38 This technique became particularly useful after methods developed for the production of uncharged agarose allowed electrophoresis in this medium without electroosmotic flow. 39'40 CA-IEF is also performed in capillaries. 41-43 The high voltage delivered by capillary electrophoresis instruments, along with the very effective heat transfer within narrow capillaries, make this an exceptionally highly resolving and rapid separation technique. CA-IEF separation patterns are sharper and more reproducible in the presence of urea at 8 M or higher. This effect is mostly due to the positive solubilizing effect that this denaturant has on proteins. Other factors may include the stabilizing effect of high viscosity and the disruption of interactions between different ampholytes. This fact has been exploited in a 2-D electrophoresis method that has probably been the most widely used application of CA-IEE 44 In the first dimension of this technique, a complex protein sample is applied to a polyacrylamide tube gel that is cast with carrier ampholyte, urea, and non-ionic detergent. Following

78

T. BERKELMAN

separation, the tube gel is equilibrated in SDS-containing buffer and applied to the top of a slab gel for size-based SDS-PAGE separation. As should be expected, carrier ampholytes produced by different suppliers by different methods differ in their physical properties and performance in isoelectric focusing. A number of comparative studies have been published comparing molecular weight distributions, buffer capacity, and resolution, 4s-s~ but a practical selection of the optimal carrier ampholyte mixture to be used in a given situation is best determined empirically. Buffer capacity and conductivity of the different mixtures is found to vary slightly across the pH spectrum, so different mixtures tend to perform better in different pH ranges. 4s,46 The average molecular weight of a carrier ampholyte mixture can be a consideration during 2-D electrophoresis, as carrier ampholytes can co-migrate with smaller proteins during the second dimension separation and interfere with protein visualization. The size distribution of carrier ampholytes is also found to vary across the pH spectrum, but Pharmalyte TM has generally been found to have a higher average molecular weight than any of the carrier ampholyte mixtures prepared by the method of Versterberg. 4s-47 Given Svensson's finding that the resolution of CA-IEF can depend on the number of individual carrier ampholyte species present in a mixture, it would seem that there might be an advantage to mixing carrier ampholytes from different suppliers in order to maximize the number of individual species. This practice does not seem to be widely applied, but carrier ampholytes of different ranges are often mixed in order to customize the shape and slope of the pH gradient generated. As an example, carrier ampholytes with a pH range of 5-8 can be blended with carrier ampholytes with a pH range of 3-10 to generate a pH gradient from 3 to 10 in which the slope of the gradient in the range from 5 to 8 is flattened in order to maximize the resolution of proteins in that pH range.

V. LIMITATIONS OF THE CARRIER AMPHOLYTE METHOD

Although CA-IEF provides protein separations of unparalleled resolution, limitations of the technique became apparent soon after its introduction. Carrier ampholytes, being a complex and poorly characterized mixture, are not always synthesized reproducibly, and variations among the pH gradients produced by different batches can occur, s~ Discontinuities in carrier ampholyte-generated pH gradients have also been reported, s2 There appear to be fundamental limitations to the pH ranges possible with CA-lEE Attempts to synthesize carrier ampholyte mixtures covering ranges falling outside of the pH range of 3 to 10 have been unsuccessful, 48 and the width of an effective carrier ampholyte-generated pH gradient has a practical lower limit of about 1 pH unit.

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

79

Carrier ampholyte-generated pH gradients are also unstable over Problems include a progressive flattening of the gradient and a loss of the basic end of the gradient (termed "cathodic drift").s6,s7 Much has been published about cathodic drift and its causes. It has been attributed variously to electroendosmosis, 6~ absorption of CO2,6~ slow electrophoretic migration of ampholytes, s9,62 aggregation of ampholytes 63 and diffusion of ampholytes out of the gradient. 64 Given the diversity of opinion on the subject, it is likely that cathodic drift is complex in origin and may have different causes in different situations. Cathodic drift can be mitigated slightly by the addition of viscosity agents such as urea or glycerol, 6s the adjustment of anolyte and catholyte pH, 62 and performing IEF in a CO2-free atmosphere. 61 There is, however, no comprehensive solution to the problem. As a result of cathodic drift, CA-IEF in the range above pH 8; this pH range is very difficult in practice. 6s,66 Since many proteins have isoelectric points in this range, this has remained a fundamental limitation of CA-IEE One method that has been developed to circumvent the problem of cathodic drift and allow the separation of basic proteins is the technique of non-equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis (NEPHGE). 67 In this technique, the protein sample is applied to the anodic end of a carrier ampholyte-containing gel and current is applied in the same manner as for conventional CA-IEE In NEPHGE, however, the run is terminated before the proteins have reached their equilibrium, focused positions. In this manner, proteins with isoelectric points above the range specified by the carrier ampholyte mixture remain within the gel. This technique is empirically observed to provide good resolution of basic proteins, although the physical mechanisms allowing proteins to be well resolved under non-equilibrium conditions are poorly understood. This technique has been used in two-dimensional separation of basic proteins, but has been criticized for its lack of reproducibility. 68 The preparative use of IEF with carrier ampholytes is limited by the difficulty of removing carrier ampholyte from purified protein preparations. Downstream applications of the purified protein often require a preparation free of carrier ampholyte contamination, yet the similar physical properties of protein and carrier ampholyte render the separation difficult. Carrier ampholytes have also been found to form associations with proteins that can be difficult to disrupt. 69,7~Methods of carrier ampholyte removal have been published and include dialysis, ammonium sulfate precipitation, and ion exchange. 48,71-74 These procedures are, however, rather complicated and time-consuming. time. s3-s9

VI. EARLYALTERNATIVEIEF MODES NOT REQUIRING CARRIERAMPHOLYTES The above-mentioned limitations of carrier ampholytes, and the expense of the larger quantities of carrier ampholytes required for

80

T. BERKELMAN

preparative applications prompted the development of a number of methods for generating pH gradients for IEF without the use of carrier ampholytes. Although none of these methods was ever widely adopted, they are of interest from a historical perspective. Since the pK a of the buffer varies with temperature, a temperature gradient imposed across a constant buffer concentration will result in a pH gradient. The effect is particularly pronounced with Tris buffer. This phenomenon has been exploited to generate pH gradients for IEF and is capable of creating pH gradients up to a single pH unit in width. 7s,76 The pK a of the buffer can also depend on the dielectric properties of the solution, and a method has been developed for isoelectric focusing in pH gradients established using a gradient of a water-miscible, high-dielectric organic component. 77 This method can yield gradients of several pH units. In both these cases, the negative effect of elevated temperature or organic solvent on protein stability and solubility probably limited the widespread use of these techniques. Rilbe (formerly Svensson) conceptualized a method for performing isoelectric focusing in simple buffers. Termed "steady-state rheoelectrolysis," this method aimed to create a stable pH gradient in an unmixed zone of buffer solution between anodic and cathodic compartments delimited by permeable membranes. 78 Normally, when a simple buffer solution is electrolyzed in such an apparatus, the acid is drawn to the anode and the base is drawn to the cathode. The result in the absence of mixing is a sharp discontinuity from low pH to high pH in the middle of the apparatus, rather than a continuous pH gradient. Rilbe proposed an instrument that continually pumped the base back to the anode and the acid back to the cathode. He postulated that a continuous pH gradient could be achieved in this manner. Some success in generating pH gradients was achieved with prototype instruments, but the method was never put into practice for separating proteins. More success was achieved in systems using two different buffers. Bier et al. demonstrated that narrow (up to 1 pH unit) but stable pH gradients could be generated with pairs of simple buffers. If both the buffers are selected to be over 90% non-ionized over the pH range of the separation, there is little buffer movement over the course of the separation. The resultant pH gradient was indeed found to be remarkably stable. 79 For a time, Bio-Rad Laboratories commercialized this method for use with Rotofor TM apparatus as a series of buffer pairs termed RotoLyte TM buffers. There are a number of advantages to this approach: buffer concentrations of up to 100 mM can be used, which allows the separation of proteins that require relatively high ionic strength for solubility. The components of the system are well characterized, show little tendency to interact with proteins, and are easily separated from the purified proteins following separation. The technique also allows highly resolving preparative separations in very narrow pH gradients.

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

81

VII. IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS Of all the pH gradient generation schemes developed in response to the disadvantages of carrier ampholytes, the most successful and widely applied has been the so-called immobilized pH gradient (IPG). This method is, in some sense, a return to the early "artificial" pH gradients generated from applied gradients of non-amphoteric buffers, s-8 The early methods were ultimately impractical because the buffers responsible for the pH gradient were themselves mobile in an electric field, thus rendering the pH gradient unstable. In an immobilized pH gradient, the buffers are covalently grafted to a support or matrix, preventing their movement. This results in a truly stable "artificial" pH gradient. The IPG principle was first described in a patent by Rosengren et al., which described the preparation of immobilized pH gradients by the covalent incorporation of buffers into a gel matrix by co-polymerization. 8~ The first IEF separations using immobilized pH gradients were presented by Bjellqvist et al. in a seminal report published in 1982. 81 The report describes a series of bifunctional buffers, each consisting of an acidic or basic buffering group connected to an acrylamido moiety via linkage to the amide nitrogen. These compounds are of the general structure CH2=CH-CONH-R, where R is the buffering group. Synthesis of these compounds is straightforward and is accomplished by reacting acryloyl chloride with a suitable amine derivative. In the case of acidic buffers, an amino acid is used. In the case of basic buffers a diamine is used. This diamine contains a primary amine that reacts with the acid chloride and a tertiary amine that acts as the buffering species. The reactive vinyl groups on these molecules allow them to be copolymerized into a polyacrylamide matrix to generate immobilized pH gradients. Linear pH gradients were prepared using a gradient mixer and two mixtures of acrylamido buffers: one relatively basic and one relatively acidic. The buffer mixtures in this first report were relatively simple, consisting of only two or three different acrylamido buffers. As a result, only narrow pH gradients were possible, spanning at most two pH units. 81 The immobilized pH gradients initially reported utilized a series of six acrylamido buffers, two acids ( p K a = 3.6 and 4.6), and four bases (pK a = 6.2, 7.0, 8.5, and 9.3). These were produced by LKB Produkter AB (now Amersham Biosciences) and sold under the trade name Immobiline TM. Additional acrylamido buffers, in particular a basic acrylamido buffer with a p K a o f 10.3 as well as a strongly acidic sulfonic acid derivative and a strongly basic quaternary amine derivative, also came into use. 82 Structures of the acrylamido buffers used for immobilized pH gradients are shown in Figure 4. Immobilized pH gradient IEF (IPG-IEF) has several advantages over CA-IEF, which were apparent even at its inception. Immobilization of the buffering species essentially conquers the problems of gradient flattening

82

T. BERKELMAN

Acidic Acrylamido Buffers

~

k~ !~ O N / ~ \OH

pK 1.0 0

pK3.6 ~ N ~ O H O pK4,6 ~N~HO H

Basic Acrylamido Buffers

~

N~

pK 6.2

0

0

pK 7.o

~ N~ II H

N ~ L~)

O pK8.5 ~ ~ l ~ O pK 9.3

O pK 10.3

pK> 12

N~

\

F I G U R E 4 Structures of acrylamido buffers used in preparing immobilized pH gradients (from reference 82).

and cathodic drift. Focusing positions of proteins in immobilized pH gradients remain the same regardless of the duration of the focusing run. This in turn results in greater reproducibility. The shape of the gradient and subsequently the focusing positions of the separated proteins depend on a relatively simple and well-defined mixture of components. Reproducibility of the gradient therefore depends only on the accuracy of fluid delivery and gradient pumping, not on the batch characteristics of reagents and the duration of the focusing run. IPG-IEF was also found to give a higher resolution than CA-IEE Perfectly smooth gradients as shallow as 0.1 pH unidcm or less are possible, resulting in separations of unprecedented resolution. The technique has allowed some impressive separations of protein isoforms that differ only by very conservative amino acid differences. 83 Immobilized pH gradients were also found to be less sensitive to the quantity of protein loaded. 84 In carrier ampholyte-generated pH gradients, proteins, being ampholytes themselves, can influence the shape of the generated gradient. This effect becomes more pronounced when more protein is loaded and is avoided by the use of immobilized pH gradients. Although it had not been initially anticipated, immobilized pH gradients also allowed analysis in previously inaccessible pH ranges. IEF of

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

113

very acidic or very basic proteins had not been possible with carrier ampholytes, owing both to the instability of gradients at extreme pH and the unavailability of carrier ampholyte mixtures that could generate pH gradients extending below pH 3 or above pH 10. Examples of IEF separations outside of this range have proliferated since the introduction of immobilized pH gradients. 68,8s-91 Methods for producing wider pH gradients were developed as well, largely through the work of Righetti and c o - w o r k e r s . 92-94 Initially, these were produced with a rather cumbersome five-chamber gradient mixer. 92 The gradients were generated from several acrylamido buffer mixtures spanning the pH range of interest. Soon thereafter, it was discovered that wide gradients were possible with a simple two-chamber mixer. A mixture of several acrylamido buffers could be prepared that gave uniform buffering power throughout the pH range of interest. This mixture would be divided into two equal portions, which were titrated to the extremes of the pH span with the most strongly acidic and basic acrylamido buffers in the range. 93 Eventually this method was further refined through the development of computer programs that allow the precise modeling of immobilized pH gradients, and the formulation of mixtures for generation of smooth, well-buffered gradients in any desired pH r a n g e . 9s-98 The basic and acidic acrylamido buffer mixtures now used for immobilized pH gradients contain differing concentrations of each of the buffers and have been optimized both for linearity of the resultant pH gradient and evenness of buffer capacity. At any given point in such an immobilized pH gradient, one or more acrylamido buffers with pK a values close to the pH value buffers the matrix. At pH values below ~5.5, the acidic acrylamido buffers provide buffering capacity and the basic acrylamido buffers act as titrants. Above pH values ~5.5, the inverse occurs. There is a region of overlap where the acidic acrylamido buffer with the highest pK~ (4.6) and the basic acrylamido buffer with the lowest pK a (6.2) can both contribute to the buffer capacity. A graph showing the contribution of each acrylamido buffer to the buffer capacity along a representative immobilized pH gradient is shown in Figure 5. The ability to generate practically any pH gradient is another attractive feature of immobilized pH gradients. In fact, there is no need for the pH gradient to be linear, and the potential advantages of non-linear pH gradients can be exploited. 99 - 101 Resolution and separation ranges can be precisely tailored to the separation problem at hand. Regions of the pH range where numerous proteins focus close to one another can be stretched in order to obtain maximum separation, and relatively sparse regions can be compressed in order to display the maximum number of proteins. Immobilized pH gradients have been widely used since their development. A review by Righetti and Bossi provides a good picture of the

84

T. BERKELMAN

7

-

I

-

pKa 3.6 pKa 4.6 pKa 6.2 pKa 7.0 pKa 8.5 pKa 9.3

I

\ 5 O O. O

4

__

_

3

I I I

\

....

I

\ \

1

f

~

,,,.t

0

-'7-. . . . 4-. . . . . 4

5

/"

~__~'_'=_-~ . . . . . . . . . . 6

~

- - "-- ,,.

-\

acrylamido acrylamido acrylamido acrylamido acrylamido acrylamido

~

.:% " ~ ' - - - " ~ . - . . ~ ' ~L.. 7

8

./"

buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer

~ .

".. " "" - * .... 9

"..'Z: "-, 10

pH FIGURE 5 C o n t r i b u t i o n s o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l a c r y l a m i d o b u f f e r s t o t h e buffering c a p a c i t y a l o n g a i m m o b i l i z e d p H g r a d i e n t o f 4 t o 10. V a l u e s w e r e c a l c u l a t e d f r o m a recipe in reference 115 u s i n g t h e s o f t w a r e d e s c r i b e d in r e f e r e n c e 96.

state of the art until 1997. l~ Earlier reviews provide in-depth background on the development of this technique. 1~176 VIII. USE OF IMMOBILIZED BUFFERS IN PREPARATIVE IEF

An immobilized pH gradient requires a matrix for the immobilization of the buffering species. The use of acrylamido buffers to generate a pH gradient requires a polyacrylamide gel, and it would therefore seem that the use of an immobilized pH gradient would preclude preparative electrofocusing in free solution. There is, however, an adaptation of the technology that allows the solution-phase isoelectric fractionation of relatively large quantities of material. Righetti, Faupel, and co-workers developed an approach in which proteins are focused in a multicompartment electrolyzer. Each compartment is separated from the next by a membrane comprised of polyacrylamide with a mixture of acrylamido buffers defining a specific pH. If the membranes are placed in ascending order of pH from anode to cathode, proteins will migrate through the device under the influence of an electric field until they reach a compartment in which the pI of the protein is flanked by the pH of the membranes defining the compartment. By circulating liquid through the compartments, the technique can be scaled to arbitrarily large volumes of sample. 1~176 This approach had been hinted at by early researchers attempting electrophoretic separations through charged membranes, 3 and the concept of preparative electrophoresis using buffering membranes was proposed as

4

GENERATION OF pH GRADIENTS

85

early as 1978; ~1~however, the optimal chemical solution to the problem of preparing amphoteric, well-buffered membranes of a defined pH was not available until the development of acrylamido buffers. Indeed, this use for the technology would seem to have been anticipated in the patent of Rosengren et al. Among the possible applications disclosed is a discontinuous pH gradient constituted by membranes in a multichamber electrolyzer. 8~ Hoefer Scientific Instruments commercialized the device of Faupel and Righetti as the IsoPrime TM instrument. More recently, the technique of fractionating protein samples in a multichamber isoelectric membrane device has been resurrected on a smaller scale as a prefractionation method for proteomic analysis. 1~1-1~4 Systems for performing this technique are sold by Invitrogen and Proteome Systems Limited.

IX. PRACTICALASPECTSOF IMMOBILIZED pH GRADIENTS Recipes for acrylamido buffer mixtures for the generation of immobilized pH gradients are available from several s o u r c e s . 1~176 Software for the design of custom gradients 95-98 is unfortunately not commercially available, but has become widely disseminated throughout the research community. Acrylamido buffers are available from Amersham Biosciences, which carries the original six Immobiline TM reagents first commercialized by LKB, and from Sigma-Aldrich, which carries a more extensive line of acrylamido buffers. The concentration of acrylamido buffers used in immobilized pH gradients is typically in the range of several mM. In addition to the buffers, the mixtures contain acrylamide and bisacrylamide to form the polyacrylamide gel matrix, and ammonium persulfate (APS) and tetramethylethylene diamine (TEMED) to initiate polymerization. The mixtures are titrated with a non-copolymerizing acid or base to bring the solution to a pH optimal for polymerization (this titrant is washed out of the gel following polymerization and does not affect the final pH gradient). Additionally, one of the mixtures is made denser than the other by the addition of glycerol. The resulting density gradient stabilizes the pH gradient as the gel polymerizes. An open two-chamber gradient maker is adequate for gradient generation; however, a computer-controlled two-syringe pump is more accurate and requires less practical experience to use. Incorporation of acrylamido buffer into the polyacrylamide matrix occurs with high efficiency. Typically, the gel is cast onto a plastic backing such as GelBond TM PAG film (available from Cambrex or Amersham Biosciences) and is then washed and dried. Prior to use, the gel is rehydrated in a solution conducive to IEE 1~176 Immobilized pH gradient gels are quite stable, particularly when dried, and thus lend themselves well to batch production and distribution. Since the introduction of this technique, precast IPG gels and strips have become available from a number of suppliers, including Bio-Rad

~6

T. BERKELMAN

Laboratories and Amersham Biosciences. These IPG strips are available in a wide variety of pH gradients and lengths. Their introduction has created another advantage to the use of immobilized pH gradients, namely the convenience and ease-of-use of a precast gel. The preparation of IPG gels has in fact become a specialty art, with the vast majority of users electing to purchase their pH gradients rather than generate their own. Instrumentation for running IPG gels and strips is rather specialized, as the current and voltage requirements for IPG-IEF are unique. There is very little ionic movement during IPG-IEF, particularly as proteins reach their focused positions, and this results in very high voltages and low currents. IPG-IEF is optimally run at voltages well in excess of 1000 V with currents below 1 mA. The instrumentation must be capable of delivering high voltage at low current and have the necessary safety features for high-voltage operation. Despite its unprecedented resolution and flexibility, the technique of IEF with immobilized pH gradients is not without limitations. Streaking, smearing, and failure to focus have been noted with many proteins. 116 This has been attributed to factors such as the poor solubility of the proteins at low ionic strength and the binding of proteins to the buffering matrix through hydrophobic or ionic interactions. 117-119 Among the measures undertaken to mitigate this problem are the inclusion of urea and neutral detergents in the focusing gel, 12~and notably, the use of carrier ampholytes in the separation medium, a2a-a23Although the use of carrier ampholytes during IEF in an immobilized pH gradient may seem to be a methodological step backwards, it does provide a clear benefit in reducing streaking and other solubility-related problems. The benefit may come from the ability of added carrier ampholytes to impart ionic strength without interfering with the pH gradient, thereby "salting in" proteins that are otherwise insoluble under conditions prevailing during lEE The ampholytes may also form complexes with the proteins and shield them from interaction with the matrix. It should be noted that the presence of urea has an effect on the protic equilibria of the acrylamido buffers that changes the characteristics of the pH gradient. At 20~ 8 M urea raises the pK a values of the acrylamido buffers by an amount that ranges from 0.4 to 0.9 pH units, with the effect more pronounced for the acidic acrylamido buffers than for the basic. When calculating pH gradients to be used in the presence of 8 M urea, it is recommended to use the p K a values determined by Gianazza et al. ~2~rather than those stated by the manufacturer. The effect of urea leads to some confusion regarding the commercially available precast IPG gels, as it is unclear whether the stated pH range is determined in the presence or absence of urea. As with CA-IEF, the dominant application of IPG-IEF is as the first dimension of 2-D electrophoresis. The routine use of IPG-IEF as the first dimension for 2-D separation of complex protein mixtures was only

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

87

possible after the development of a robust method that solved many of the smearing and streaking problems that accompanied the technique. The development of such a method has largely been the work of G6rg and others. 124,125 In this method, the dry plastic-backed IPG gel is cut into thin strips. The strips are then rehydrated in a solution containing high concentrations of urea and other neutral chaotropes, as well as reductant, detergent, and carrier ampholyte, all of which aid in maintaining protein solubility during the separation. This technique is very widely applied and has been extended to narrow gradients, very wide gradients, and alkaline gradients. 68,87,91,125

REFERENCES 1. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. I. The differential equation of solute concentrations at a steady state and its solution for simple cases, Acta Chem. Scand. 15:325-341, 1961. 2. Ikeda, K. and Suzuki, S.. Process of separating glutamic acid and other products of hydrolysis of albuminous substances from one another by electrolysis. U.S. Patent 1,015,891, 1912. 3. Svensson, H. Preparative electrophoresis and ionophoresis. In Advances in Protein Chemistry, Vol. IV (Anson, M. L. and Edsall, J.T. Eds.) Academic Press, New York, pp. 251-296, 1948. 4. Williams, R. R. and Waterman, R. E. Electrodialysis as a means of characterizing ampholytes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27:56-58, 1930. 5. Kolin, A. Separation and concentration of proteins in a pH field combined with an electric field. J. Chem. Phys. 22:1628-1629, 1954. 6. Kolin, A. Electrophoretic "line spectra". J. Chem. Phys. 23:407-408, 1955. 7. Kolin, A. Isoelectric spectra and mobility spectra: a new approach to electrophoretic separation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 41:101-110, 1955. 8. Hoch, H. and Barr, G. H. Paper electrophoresis with superimposed pH gradient. Science 122:243-244, 1955. 9. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients, II. Buffering capacity and conductance of isoionic ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand. 16:456-466, 1962. 10. Vesterberg, O. and Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients, IV. Further studies on the resolving power in connection with separation of myoglobins. Acta Chem. Scand. 20:820-834, 1966. 11. Vesterberg, O. Synthesis and isoelectric fractionation of carrier ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand. 23:2653-2665, 1969. 12. Vesterberg, O. A. Y. Method of isoelectric fractionation. U.S. Patent 3,485,736, 1969. 13. Davies, H. Some physical and chemical properties of the Ampholine chemicals. Prot. Biol. Fluids 17:389-396, 1970. 14. Vinogradov, S. N., Lowenkorn, S., Andonian, M. R. and Bagshaw, J. Synthetic ampholytes for the isoelectric focusing of proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 52:501-506, 1973. 15. Righetti, P. G., Pagani, M. and Gianazza, E. Characterization of synthetic carrier ampholytes for isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 109:341-356, 1975. 16. Grubhofer, N. and Borja, C. Synthesis of carrier ampholytes for isoelectric focusing containing sulfonic and phosphonic acid groups covering a wide pH range. In

~

T. BERKELMAN

17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24.

25. 26. 27.

28. 29.

30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36.

37. 38.

39.

Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D. Eds.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 111-120, 1976. Grubhofer, N. and Pogacar, P. Ampholytes for focusing electrophoresis. U.S. Patent 3,770,603, 1973. S6derberg, L., Buckley, D., Hagstr6m, G. and Bergstr6m, J. The chemical properties of Pharmalyte. Prot. Biol. Fluids 27:687-691, 1980. S6derberg, J. L. Ampholyte and its use in separation processes. U.S. Patent 4,334,972, 1982. Adweh, Z. L. and Williamson, A. R. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel and its application to immunoglobulins. Nature 219:66-67, 1968. Catsimpoolas, N. Micro isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 26:480-482, 1968. Dale, G. and Latner, A .L. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Lancet 1:847, 1968. Fawcett, J. S. Isoelectric fractionation of proteins on polyacrylamide gels. FEBS Lett. 1:81-82, 1968. Leaback, D. H. and Rutter, A. C. Polyacrylamide-isoelectric-focusing: a new technique for the electrophoresis of proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 32:447-453, 1968. Riley, R. E and Coleman, M. K. Isoelectric fractionation of proteins on a microscale in polyacrylamide and agarose matrices. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 72:714-720, 1968. Wrigley, C.W. Analytical fractionation of plant and animal proteins by gel electrofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 36:362-365, 1968. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients, III. Description of apparatus for electrolysis in columns stabilized by density gradients and direct determination of isoelectric points. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. Suppl. 1:132-138, 1962. Rilbe, H. Rapid isoelectric focusing in density gradient columns. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209:80-93, 1973. Egen, N. B., Thorman, W., Twitty, G. E. and Bier. M. A new preparative scale focusing apparatus. In Electrophoresis '83 (Hirai, H., Ed.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 547-550, 1984. Bier, M. Rotating apparatus for isoelectric focusing. U.S. Patent 4,588,492, 1986. Radola, B. J. Isoelectric focusing in layers of granulated gels, I. Thin-layer isoelectric focusing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 295:412-429, 1973. Radola, B. J. Analytical and preparative isoelectric focusing in gel-stabilized layers. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209:127-143, 1973. Catsimpoolas, N. Isoelectric focusing of proteins in gel media. Separation Science 5:523-524, 1970. Wellner, D. and Hayes, M. B. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209:34-43, 1973. Righetti, P. G. and Drysdale, J. W. Isoelectric focusing in gels. J. Chromatogr. 98:271-321, 1974. Chrambach, A. and Baumann, G. Isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gel. In Isoelectric Focusing (Catsimpoolos, N., Ed.) Academic Press, New York, pp. 77-91, 1976. Quast, R. The electroosmotic flow in agarose gels and the value of agarose as stabilizing agent in gel electrofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 54:405-412, 1971. Binion, S. and Rodkey, L. S. Simplified method for synthesizing ampholytes suitable for use in isoelectric focusing of immunoglobulins in agarose gels. Anal. Biochem. 112:362-366, 1981. L~s, T. Agar derivatives for chromatography, electrophoresis and gel-bound enzymes: II. Charge-free agar. J. Chromatogr. 66:347-355, 1972.

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

8~

40. Thompson, B. J., Dunn, M. J., Burghes, A. H, M. and Dubowitz, V. Improvements of isoelectric focusing in agarose for direct tissue isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 3:307-314, 1982. 41. Wehr, T., Zhu, M. and Rodriguez-Diaz, R. Capillary isoelectric focusing. Meth. Enzymol. 270:358-374, 1996. 42. Righetti, P. G., Gelfi, C. and Conti, M. Current trends in capillary isoelectric focusing of proteins. J. Chromatogr. B 699:91-104, 1997. 43. Shimura, K. Recent advances in capillary isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 23:3847-3857, 2002. 44. O'Farrell, P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250:4007-4021. 1975. 45. Fredriksson, S. Comparison of the buffer capacities of Ampholine and Servalyt carrier ampholyte systems used in isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 135:441-446, 1977. 46. Gelsema, W. J., de Ligny, C. L. and van der Veen, N. G. Comparison of the specific conductivities, buffer capacities and molecular weights of focused Ampholine, Servalyte and Pharmalyte carrier ampholytes used in isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 173:33-41, 1979. 47. Gelsema, W. J., de Ligny, C. L. and Blanken, W. M. Gel chromatographic comparison of the molecular weight distributions of Ampholine, Servalyte and Pharmalyte carrier ampholytes used in isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 198:301-316, 1980. 48. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric Focusing: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Elsevier Biomedical, Amsterdam, 1983. 49. Radola, B. J., Tschesche, H. and Schuricht, H. Characterization of carrier ampholytes by new visualization reactions and chromatographic methods. In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D., Eds.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 97-110, 1976. 50. Chen, A. B., Rickel, C. A., Flanigan, A., Hunt, G. and Moorhouse, K. G. Comparison of ampholytes used for slab gel and capillary isoelectric focusing of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator glycoforms. J. Chromatogr. A. 744:279-284, 1996. 51. Tollaksen, S. L., Edwards, J. J. and Anderson, N. G. The use of carbamylated charge standards for testing batches of ampholytes used in two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2:155-160, 1981. 52. Frater, R. Behaviour of Ampholines during isoelectric focusing. Anal. Biochem. 38:536-538, 1970. 53. Miles, L. E., Simmons, J. E. and Chrambach, A. Instability of pH gradients in isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gel. Anal. Biochem. 49:109-117, 1972. 54. Rilbe, H. Stable pH gradients--a key problem in isoelectric focusing. In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D. Ed.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 35-50, 1976. 55. Chrambach, A., Doerr, P., Finlayson, G. R., Miles, L. E. M., Sherins, R. and Rodbard, D. Instability of pH gradients formed by isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide Gel. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209:44-64, 1973. 56. Thormann, W., Egen, N. B. and Bier, M. Characterization of synthetic carrier ampholytes by repetitive scanning of the electric field during focusing. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 11:287-293, 1985. 57. Righetti, P. G. and Drysdale, J. W. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 236:17-28, 1971. 58. Murel, A., Kirjanen, I. and Kirret, O. Instability and non-linearity of the pH gradient formed in isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 174:1-11, 1979. 59. Mosher, R. A., Thormann, W. and Bier, M. An explanation for the plateau phenomenon in isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 351:31-38, 1986. 60. Righetti, P. G. and Macelloni, C. New polyacrylamide matrices for drift-free isoelectric focusing. J. Biochem. Biophys Methods 5:1-15, 1982.

~0

T. BERKELMAN

61. Delinc~e, H. and Radola, B. J. Determination of isoelectric points in thin-layer isoelectric focusing: the importance of attaining the steady state and the role of CO 2 interference. Anal. Biochem. 90:609-623, 1978. 62. Nguyen, N. Y. and Chrambach, A. Stabilization of pH gradients formed by Ampholine. Anal. Biochem. 82:226-235, 1977. 63. Gianazza, E., Astorri, C. and Righetti, P. G. Ampholine-ampholine interactions as a cause of pH gradient drift in isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 171:161-169, 1979. 64. Hunter, L. Equilibrium isoelectric focussing in acrylamide gel slabs--reduction of cathodic drift. Anal. Biochem. 89:279-283, 1978. 65. Burghes, A. H. M., Dunn, M. J. and Dubowitz, V. Enhancement of resolution in twodimensional gel electrophoresis and simultaneous resolution of acidic and basic proteins. Electrophoresis 3:354-363, 1982. 66. Rabilloud, T. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic proteins with equilibrium isoelectric focusing in carrier ampholyte pH gradients. Electrophoresis 15:278-282, 1994. 67. O'Farrell, E Z., Goodman, H. M. and O'Farrell, P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. Cell 12:1133-1141, 1977. 68. G6rg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Csordas, A., Diaz, J.-J. and Madjar, J.-J. Very alkaline immobilized pH gradients for two-dimensional electrophoresis of ribosomal and nuclear proteins. Electrophoresis 18:328-337, 1997. 69. Bengtsson, G. and Olivecrona, T. Does lipoprotein lipase bind ampholytes? In Electrofocusing and Isotachophoresis (Radola, B. J. and Graesslin, D.Ed.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 189-195, 1976. 70. Bloomster, T. G. and Watson, D. W. Effects of carrier ampholyte contamination on the biological and biochemical properties of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C. Infect. Immun. 39:311-314, 1983. 71. Vesterberg, O. Separation of proteins from carrier ampholytes. Sci. Tools 16:24-27, 1969. 72. Vesterberg, O. Isoelectric focusing of proteins. Meth. Enzymol. 22:389-411, 1971. 73. Vesterberg, O. Physiochemical properties of the carrier ampholytes and some biochemical applications. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209:23-33, 1973. 74. Garfin, D. E. Isoelectric focusing. Meth. Enzymol. 182:459-477, 1991. 75. Luner, S. J. and Kolin, A. A new approach to isoelectric focusing and fractionation of proteins in a pH gradient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 66:898-303, 1970. 76. Huang, T. and Pawliszyn, J. Microfabrication of a tapered channel for isoelectric focusing with thermally generated pH gradient. Electrophoresis 23:3504-3510, 2002. 77. Troitsky, G. V., Zav'yalov, V. P., Kirjukhin, I. E, Abramov, V. M. and Agitsky, G. Ju. Isoelectric focusing of proteins using a pH gradient created by a concentration gradient of nonelectrolytes in solution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 400:24-31, 1975. 78. Rilbe, H. Steady-state rheoelectrolysis. J. Chromatogr. 159:193-205, 1978. 79. Bier, M., Ostrem, J. and Marquez, R. B. A new buffering system and its use in electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 14:1011-1018, 1993. 80. Rosengren, A., Bjellqvist, B. and Gasparic, V. Method for generating a pH-function for use in electrophoresis. U.S. Patent 4,130,471, 1978. 81. Bjellqvist, B., Ek, K., Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., G6rg, A., Westermeier, R. and Postel, W. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: principle, methodology and some applications. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 6:317-339, 1982. 82. Chiari, M. and Righetti, P. G. The Immobiline family: from "vacuum" to "plenum" chemistry. Electrophoresis 13:187-191, 1992. 83. Cossu, G. and Righetti, P. G. Resolution of Gv and Av foetal haemoblobin tetramers in immobilized pH gradients. J. Chromatogr. 398:211-216, 1987. 84. Gelfi, C. and Righetti, P. G. Preparative isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients. II. A case report. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 8:157-172, 1983. 85. Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E. and Celentano, E C. Recipe for a pH 3-4 immobilized gradient for isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 356:9-14, 1986.

4

GENERATIONOF pH GRADIENTS

91

86. Gelfi, C., Bossi, M. L., Bjellqvist, B. and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients in the pH 10-11 range. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 15:41-48, 1987. 87. Sinha, P., K6ttgen, E., Westermeier, R. and Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH 2.5-11 gradients for two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 13:210-214, 1987. 88. Coronel, E., Little, B. W. and Alhadeff, J. A. Immobilized pH gradient focusing of alkaline proteins: analysis of the isoform composition of purified human non-secretory ribonucleases from kidney, liver and spleen. Biochem. J. 296:553-556, 1993. 89. Bossi, A., Righetti, P. G., Vecchio, G. and Severinsen, S. Focusing of alkaline proteases (subtilisins) in pH 10-12 immobilized gradients. Electrophoresis 15:1535-1540, 1994. 90. Bossi, A., Gelfi, C., Orsi, A. and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing of histones in extremely alkaline immobilized pH gradients: comparison with capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. 686:121-128, 1994. 91. MoUoy, M. P., Phadke, N. D., Chen, H., Tyldesley, R., Garfin, D. E., Maddock, J. R. and Andrews, P. C. Profiling the alkaline membrane proteome of Caulobacter crescentus with two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2:899-910, 2002. 92. Dossi, G., Celentano, E, Gianazza, E. and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: generation of extended pH intervals. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 7:123-142, 1983. 93. Gianazza, E., Dossi, G., Celentano, E and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: generation and optimization of wide pH intervals with two-chamber mixers. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 8:109-133, 1983. 94. Gianazza, E., Celentano, E, Dossi, G., Bjellqvist, B. and Righetti, P. G. Preparation of immobilized pH gradients spanning 2-6 pH units with two-chamber mixers: evaluation of two experimental approaches. Electrophoresis 5:88-97, 1984. 95. Celentano, E C., Tonani, C., Fazio, M., Gianazza, E. and Righetti, P. G. pH gradients generated by polyprotic buffers, I. Theory and computer simulation. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 16:109-128, 1988. 96. Altland, K. IPGMAKER: A program for IBM-compatible personal computers to create and test recipes for immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 11:140-147, 1990. 97. Tonani, C. and Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH gradients (IPG) simulator--an additional step in pH gradient engineering, I. Linear pH gradients. Electrophoresis 12:1011-1021, 1991. 98. Giafredda, E., Tonani, C. and Righetti, P. G. pH gradient simulator for electrophoretic techniques in a Windows environment. J. Chromatogr. 630:313-327, 1993. 99. Gianazza, E., Giacon, P., Sahlin, G. and Righetti, P. G. Non-linear pH courses with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 6:53-56, 1985. 100. Righetti, P. G. and Tonani, C. Immobilized pH gradients (IPG) simulatorman additional step in pH gradient engineering: II: Nonlinear pH gradients. Electrophoresis 12:1021-1027, 1991. 101. Bjellqvist, B., Pasquali, C., Ravier, E, Sanchez, J.-C. and Hochstrasser, D. A non-linear wide-range immobilized pH gradient for two-dimensional electrophoresis and its definition in a relevant pH scale. Electrophoresis 14:1357-1365, 1993. 102. Righetti, P. G. and Bossi, A. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: Recent analytical and preparative developments. Anal. Biochem. 247:1-10, 1997. 103. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients. J. Chromatogr. 300:165-223, 1984. 104. G6rg, A., Fawcett, J. S. and Chrambach, A. The current state of electrofocusing in immobilized pH gradients. In Advances in electrophoresis (Chrambach, A., Dunn, M. J. and Radola, B. J. Eds.) VCH, Weinheim, pp. 1-41, 1989. 105. Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH Gradients: Theory and Methodology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.

~-

T. BERKELMAN

106. Wenger, P., de Zuanni, M., Javet, P., Gelfi, C. and Righetti, P. G. Amphoteric, isoelectric Immobiline membranes for preparative isoelectric focusing. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 14:29-43, 1987. 107. Faupel, M., Barzaghi, B., Gelfi, C. and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric protein purification by orthogonally coupled hydraulic and electric transports in a segmented immobilized pH gradient. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 15:147-162, 1987. 108. Righetti, P. G., Barzaghi, B., Luzzana, M., Manfredi, G. and Faupel, M. A horizontal apparatus for isoelectric protein purification in a segmented immobilized pH gradient. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 15:189-198, 1987. 109. Righetti, P. G., Wenisch, E. and Faupel, M. Preparative protein purification in a multi-compartment electrolyser with Immobiline membranes. J. Chromatogr. 475:293-304, 1989. 110. Martin, A. J. P. and Hampson, E New apparatus for isoelectric focussing. J. Chromatogr. 159:101-110, 1978. 111. Zuo, X. and Speicher, D. W. A method for global analysis of complex proteomes using sample prefractionation by solution isoelectrofocusing prior to two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 284:266-278, 2000. 112. Herbert, B. R. and Righetti, P. G. A turning point in proteome analysis: Sample prefractionation via multicompartment electrolyzers with isoelectric membranes. Electrophoresis 21:3639-3648, 2000. 113. Zuo, X., Echan, L., Hembach, P., Tang, H. Y., Speicher, K. D., Santoli, D. and Speicher, D. W. Towards global analysis of mammalian proteomes using sample prefractionation prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels and using one-dimensional gels for insoluble and large proteins. Electrophoresis 22:1603-1615, 2001. 114. Shang, T. Q., Ginter, J. M. and Johnstons, M. V. Carrier ampholyte-free solution isoelectric focusing as a prefractionation method for the proteomic analysis of complex protein mixtures. Electrophoresis 24:2359-2368, 2003. 115. Westermeier, R. Electrophoresis in practice, 3rd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000. 116. Esteve-Romero, J., Sim6-Alfonso, E., Bossi, A., Bresciani, E and Righetti, P. G. Sample streaks and smears in immobilized pH gradient gels. Electrophoresis 17:704-708, 1996. 117. Righetti, P. G., Gelfi, C., Bossi, M. L. and Boscheti, E. Isoelectric focusing and nonisoelectric precipitation of ferritin in immobilized pH gradients: An improved protocol overcoming protein-matrix interactions. Electrophoresis 8:62-70, 1987. 118. Rabilloud, T. Solubilization of proteins for electrophoretic analyses. Electrophoresis 17:813-829, 1996. 119. Rabilloud, T., Adessi, C., Giraudel, A. and Lunardi, J. Improvement of the solubilization of proteins in two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 18:307-316, 1997. 120. Gianazza, E., Artoni G. and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients in presence of urea and neutral detergents. Electrophoresis 4:321-326, 1983. 121. Rimpilainen, M. A. and Righetti, P. G. Membrane protein analysis by isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 6:419-422, 1985. 122. Fawcett, J. S. and Chrambach, A. The voltage across wide pH range immobilized pH gradient gels and its modulation through the addition of carrier ampholytes. Electrophoresis 7:266-272, 1986. 123. Righetti, P. G., Chiari, M. and Gelfi, C. Immobilized pH gradients: Effects of salts, added carrier ampholytes and voltage gradients on protein patterns. Electrophoresis 9:65-73, 1988. 124. G6rg, A., Postel, W. and Giinther, S. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 9:531-546, 1988. 125. G6rg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Harder, A., Scheibe, B., Wildgruber, R. and Weiss, W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:1037-1053, 2000.

5

SLAB GEL IEF REINER W E S T E R M E I E R

Amersham Biosciences,Munzinger Strasse 9 D-7911 I, Freiburg, Germany

I. INTRODUCTION II. EQUIPMENT A. Isoelectric Focusing Chamber B. Thermostatic Circulator C. Power Supply III. THE GEL MATRIX A. Matrix Effects B. Electroendosmosis C. Cathode Drift IV. POLYACRYLAMIDE GELS A. Gel Composition B. Gel Geometry C. Carrier Ampholyte Gels D. Protein Detection E. Immobilized pH Gradients V. AGAROSE GELS A. Gel Preparation B. Running Conditions C. Protein Detection VI. DEXTRAN GELS VII. EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOLS: POLYACRYLAMIDE SLAB GEL IEF A. Carrier Ampholyte Polyacrylamide Gel IEF B. Immobilized pH Gradient IEF REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Isoelectric focusing (IEF) is most commonly carried out in polyacrylamide slab gels. This was not always the case, but over the years the slab format proved preferable to other possible configurations for the technique. The first practical realization of IEF was performed in glass columns containing sucrose density gradients. 1 The pH gradients were generated with carrier ampholytes and the sucrose density gradients 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

93

94

R. WESTERMEIER

stabilized focused bands against precipitation. These gradients tended to be physically unstable and required elution from the bottom of the columns for protein detection, both of which resulted in loss of resolution. The first attempt at employing more stable media and more compact geometry was that of Wrigley, 2 who used disc electrophoresis equipment to run IEF separations in cylindrical polyacrylamide gel rods in glass tubes. Here, too, pH gradients were established with carrier ampholytes. Because staining of the tube gels in the presence of carrier ampholytes was problematic, two-dimensional separation technique was developed, which combined the gel-rod technique with thin-layer electrophoresis. 3 The cylindrical geometry of both sucrose gradients and gel rods allow sample loading only at one end of the gradient, i.e., either at the anode or at the cathode side. It was soon recognized by Awdeh et al. 4 as well as Leaback and Rutter s that horizontally placed slab gels would allow sample loading anywhere along the pH gradient, and, moreover, such gel layers would allow direct comparison of different samples in the same gel. Figure 1 shows the first apparatus for performing IEF in polyacrylamide slab gels. 4 In this apparatus, two carbon electrodes are mounted 20cm apart in a simple plastic box. A glass plate holding the gel rests horizontally on the carbon electrodes that are connected to an external power supply. The gel is cast between two glass plates separated by a 1-mm-thick silicone rubber gasket and clamped together with spring

F I G U R E I The first apparatus for slab gel IEF in polyacrylamide matrix according to Awdeh,Williamson, and Askonas. (a) polyacrylamide gel layer I mm thick; (b) glass plate; (c) carbon electrodes 20 cm apart; (d) site of sample application. Each sample, 100/400 pg of protein in less than 50 pL, is pipetted onto the surface of the gel and spread over a rectangular area about I x 2 cm (reproduced after Awdeh et al.4).

5

SLABGEL IEF

95

clips. The monomer solution, mixed with carrier ampholytes, is pipetted into this cassette and left to polymerize overnight. Coating one of the glass plates with a thin layer of silicone grease makes it easy to remove from the polymerized gel surface while the gel slab adheres to the other plate. Samples are applied by first pipetting them onto small filter paper squares and then inserting the strips into short slots cut at the desired application points. For the separation, the carbon cathode is often moistened with 5% (v/v) ethylene diamine and the anode with 5% (v/v) phosphoric acid, but this is not always necessary. The glass plate holding the gel and sample papers is placed inverted onto the carbon electrodes. In order to prevent drying of the gel, the walls of the box are sometimes covered with plastic sponge sheets moistened with water. The lid is closed and the box is placed in a chilled environment, and a voltage of 400V is applied to the electrodes for about 4-16h. With the original device, active cooling of the gels was attempted by applying a puddle of gasoline on the glass plate and taking advantage of its latent heat of evaporation. Obviously, IEF was a dangerous business at this time. Some alternative matrix materials for carrier ampholyte IEF have been tried, such as agarose gels, granulated dextran or polyacrylamide beads, and cellulose acetate foils. A comprehensive description of all these matrices can be found in the book by Righetti. 6 This chapter describes the most successful approaches to slab gel lEE

II. EQUIPMENT A. Isoelectric Focusing Chamber In standard IEF chambers, such as those sold by Amersham Biosciences and shown in Figure 2, gels are placed horizontally on watercooled plates with inert surfaces with the gel surface facing upward. The aluminum ceramic plates of standard apparatus contain cooling coils for even temperature distribution over the gel area and accurate temperature control of the gel. The cooling plates are connected to external thermostatic circulators as shown in Figure 3. Platinum electrodes are usually used and they are connected to an external power supply. Electrical contact between the gel edges and the electrodes is made with paper strips soaked with electrode solutions: an acid for the anode and a base for the cathode. The lids of well-made chambers are closed tightly to avoid humidity entering the chamber, because the development of water condensation should be kept to a minimum. Some models provide space in the chamber for wide filter strips soaked in NaOH solution to absorb carbon dioxide from the air. Reservoirs of limestone granules sometimes serve the same purpose. This is done because carbon dioxide absorbed into the gel carboxylic acid and shifts the basic

96

R. WESTERMEIER

FIGURE 3

Schematic drawing of an IEF slab gel apparatus.

pH value of the pH gradient toward neutral. When oxygen-sensitive proteins are to be focused, chambers are flushed with nitrogen gas. Because high voltages, up to 5000 V, are applied, the chambers must be completely closed and contain safety cut-out switches in their lids.

B. Thermostatic Circulator The circulator pump must be strong enough to maintain a high flow rate for efficient cooling and temperature maintenance. This is very important for dissipating the high heat levels that can be developed during IEE

5

SLABGEL IEF

97

Furthermore, the pK values of the buffers and the proteins are temperature-dependent, so that uniform and reproducible temperature is necessary for run-to-run consistency.

C. Power Supply Since resolution in IEF is improved with high voltages, a high-voltage power supply is necessary. The better power supplies are programmable in order to allow multiple-step IEF protocols to be run automatically. It is very useful to have a power control feature to avoid exposing the gels to excessive power conditions (and, therefore, excessive heating). For a high degree of run-to-run reproducibility, a volt-hour integrator should be built into the power supply. Power supplies, however, do not need to deliver high currents, because the conductivity of IEF gels is rather low compared with electrophoresis and blotting tanks.

III. THE GEL MATRIX A. Matrix Effects Ideally the gel should not retard proteins, but should serve mainly as an efficient anticonvective medium. Gels with large pore sizes naturally have low mechanical strength. Handling of these gel slabs during fixing and staining is very cumbersome, so IEF slab gels are usually supported on plastic foils or thin glass plates.

B. Electroendosmosis The phenomenon called electroendosmosis can destroy a pH gradient and ruin resolution. It occurs when the separation matrix and (or) parts of the equipment that are in direct contact with the gel contain fixed charges. For example , aged polyacrylamide gels can contain carboxylic groups from the acrylic acid that result from hydrolysis of acrylamide. Also, agarose gels contain carboxylic and sulfonic groups, which are remnants of the agaropectin from which agarose is made. On glass surfaces silicon dioxide groups are in contact with the gels. In the regions of neutral and basic pH, these acidic groups become deprotonated and thus negatively charged. In these cases, positive counterions, along with their hydration shells, are transported toward the cathode under the influence of the electric field. This movement of ions and water leads to shrinking of the gel in the anodal area and water exudation at the cathodal area. Additionally, the basic carrier ampholytes and the proteins in this area are carried away toward the cathode. This effect is the major reason for instability of the pH gradient such as gradient drift and plateau phenomenon.

98

R. WESTERMEIER

C. Cathode Drift Finlayson and Chrambach 7 observed a so-called plateau phenomenon in pH gradients that occurs after a certain focusing time: the pH gradient becomes steeper at the two ends and flattens in the center. Independently, Righetti and Drysdale 8 detected the same effect, which they called "cathodic drift." This instability of the pH gradient is more pronounced in the basic area, hence the cathode drifts is more obvious than the plateau phenomenon. It is time and voltage-dependent, and leads to losses of proteins at the two ends of the gradient. Righetti has "collected" seven reasons for cathode drift: 6 (1) electrophoretic migration of carrier ampholytes, (2) electroendosmosis, (3) formation of a pure water zone at neutral pH, (4) IEF of water at pH 7 causing a backflow toward the electrodes, (5) progressive decay of carrier ampholytes, (6) gain or loss of charged ligand of carrier ampholytes, and (7) diffusion of electrolytes into the gel. In order to keep the cathode drift to a minimum, focusing voltage and time should both be held to the minimum needed for proper focusing the proteins in the sample. Very often the focusing conditions are controlled with the help of the volt-hour integral. Care must be taken to use inert matrix ingredients. In agarose gels, cathode drift is more pronounced than in polyacrylamide gels. In denaturing IEF (see below), the cathodic drift causes more problems than in native gels, because of the longer focusing times necessary to move the unfolded and bulky proteins through a highly viscous urea-gel matrix

IV. POLYACRYLAMIDEGELS A. Gel Composition Polyacrylamide is an ideal matrix for IEF with both carrier ampholytes and immobilized pH gradients. It is chemically inert, compact, completely transparent, and free of electroendosmosis (see above). Moreover, polyacrylamide can be formed in any shape, in particular as rectangular slabs. Polyacrylamide gels are formed in cassettes by flee-radicalinduced polymerization in aqueous mixtures of acrylamide and with N,N'-methylenbisacrylamide (Bis) as crosslinker. Polymerization initiators such as tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) and ammonium persulfate generate the requisite free radicals for the reaction. The reaction is best performed in oxygen-depleted solution, because oxygen is a potent inhibitor of polymerization. Two glass plates separated by a gasket and held together with clamps form a gel cassette. As already mentioned, in IEF, it is desirable to keep the retardation effect of the matrix as low as possible. Large pore-size gels, usually gels with a total acrylamide concentration of 5 % T and a crosslinking factor of 3 % C are used.

5

SLABGEL IEF

99

The T and C values of the gels are defined as follows: T =

a+b

b

V x 100(%), C - a + b x 100(%)

(1)

where a is the mass of acrylamide in g, b the mass of methylenebisacrylamide in g, and V the volume in mL. With less than 5% T and/or 3% C gels are not easily handled, because they become too soft. C values higher than 7% C increase the pore size but lead to very hydrophobic and brittle gel matrices. The reagents need to be of high quality, because the IEF method is very sensitive to contaminants and electroendosmosis (see above). Gels should be polymerized overnight in order to complete the "silent polymerization" that occurs after gel formation. That is, overnight polymerization is beneficial because it exhausts unreacted monomers. If gels are used too early, interactions between reactive monomer compounds and some proteins can occur.

B. Gel Geometry Some laboratories use vertical slab gel electrophoresis equipment for IEE In this case, the gel remains in the casting cassette between two glass plates during the run. For the separation, the cassette is placed vertically between two buffer tanks. The disadvantages of this arrangement are: (1) sample can only be loaded at the end of the gradient; (2) the buffer tanks need to be filled with large volumes of electrode solutions; (3) as IEF separates only according to the charge, the gel matrix must contain large pore sizes. Such a soft gel can slide down between vertical glass plates. The gel should preferably be cast on a film support. (4) The contact to glass surfaces leads to electroendosmosis and thus to enhanced cathodal drift. (5) Temperature in most of these chambers cannot be well controlled. IEF has to be performed under active temperature control. (6) Vertical electrophoresis chambers are not suitable for high voltages. The focusing step needs high electric field strength. Therefore, the horizontal flatbed chambers with cooling devicesmas described above--are the best choice.

C. Carrier Ampholyte Gels It is usual to add 2% (w/v) carrier ampholytes to the monomer solution prior to polymerization. Unless a supplier indicates otherwise, it should be assumed that the dry-weight content of a carrier ampholytes stock solution is 40% (w/v). If less than 2% carrier ampholytes are used, the buffering capacity can be insufficient, whereas if more than 2% are used, the loading capacity is reduced because the carrier ampholytes compete with the proteins for the water in the gel.

I

R.WESTERMEIER

O0 I. Choices of Carrier Ampholytes

Carrier ampholytes are mixtures of 600-700 different homologues of amphoteric compounds with a spectrum of isoelectric points between 3 and 11. They form pH gradients under the influence of electric fields. These substances have high buffering capacities at their isoelectric points. They have molecular weights below lkDa and do not bind to proteins because they are highly hydrophilic. Narrow interval mixtures are available to increase the resolution and for the selection of defined isoelectric point ranges. The differences between carrier ampholytes of different suppliers are based on the chemistry of their production. The original carrier ampholytes, developed by Vesterberg 9 and marketed under the name "AmpholineTM, '' are produced by reacting aliphatic oligoamines with acrylic acids. Other products are co-polymers of glycine, glycylglycine, amines, and epichlorhydrin. Thus, the isoelectric points and buffering properties of the individual homologs of the different products are slightly different and produce different results. For the sake of reproducibility within an experimental series or for consistency of results in a validated analysis it is important to stay with one product. Some laboratories mix the carrier ampholytes from different suppliers to achieve a mixture with a higher number of different homologs in order to obtain smoother pH gradients. 2. Gel Polymerization

There are two ways to polymerize polyacrylamide gels: (1) chemical polymerization with TEMED and ammonium persulfate; and (2) photopolymerization with riboflavin and TEMED. The choice of the polymerization method is dependent on the composition of the carrier ampholytes, which is different for the various commercial products, and on the pH range. Righetti and Caglio 1~ found that polymerization efficiency with the persulfate-TEMED system is most efficient above pH 6, whereas photopolymerization with riboflavin-TEMED is most efficient below pH 6. In the presence of carrier ampholytes it is not necessary to add TEMED, because carrier ampholytes contain primary amino groups to initiate the chain reaction. In this case, photopolymerization has the advantage that no ionic additive is added. In general, chemical polymerization is easier to perform, because no light source is needed. 3. Prepolymerized Gels

If unreacted reagents from polymerization are of concern, gels can be prepolymerized without carrier ampholytes, then washed and dried and rehydratated with carrier ampholyte-containing solution before use. l~ This rehydratation concept works best, of course, with very thin slab gels. Rehydratation can be performed in the same glass cassette used for casting the gel, or in a horizontal plastic tray with a defined volume of rehydratation solution. It is very important that the surface of such a

5

SLAB GEL IEF

I0 1

tray is not smooth, because the surface of the incompletely swollen gel could stick to the bottom of the tray. These washed gels can be run without electrode solutions; no filter-paper strips between electrodes and the gel edges are needed. 12 Practice has shown that zymogram techniques (see Section D 2) function much better with washed and rehydratated gels, because the reactive catalysts and non-reacted acrylamide monomers have been removed from these gels. 4. Ultrathin-layer IEF Gels

Soft IEF gels are not easy to handle during fixing and staining, thus gels that were 2-3 mm thick were the first to be used. The first commercial precast gels were 1 mm in thickness and supported on Mylar sheets. For preparing very thin gels in the laboratory, cellophane film can be used to achieve mechanical stability. As shown in Figure 4, thinner gels show sharper bands and higher resolution than 1 mm and thicker gels. 13 The thickness of lab-cast gels is often defined by the number of layers of Parafilm | used as gaskets: one layer is 120 l.tm thick. It does not help to make gels thinner than 200 ~tm. When gels with a thinner layer are used, the gradient starts to shrink to a shorter distance, leaving two plateaus without any bands on both ends of the gels (unpublished observations by the author). Radola suggested use of small 50 to 100-Bm thin gels with short separation distances. TM These extremely thin gels with 5 cm edge length are very sensitive to salt or other contaminations in the sample, and can only be used to display highly purified proteins. In comparison with standard gel thickness, ultrathin gels offer faster separation, higher sensitivity in staining, and cost saving because of the

F I G U R E 4 The influence of gel thickness on the resolution in IEF. Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining. Lane (M) marker proteins: (I) trypsin; (2) soybean lipoxidase; (3) and (4) legume seed proteins (reproduced after G/~rg et al.13).

102

R.WESTERMEIER

lower carrier ampholytes consumption. Ultrathin-layer gels are also very useful for the detection of peptides with specific stains is using a printing technique. 5. A d d i t i v e s

Proteins can be focused under native or denaturing conditions, in practice, native conditions are mostly employed. Denatured proteins show only one IEF band, whereas different native conformations can result in multiple-band patterns. Under native conditions proteins are present in multiple conformations, which often results in multiple-band patterns for single proteins. Treating samples with 8 M urea and a reducrant, such as dithiothreitol or 2-mercaptoethanol, and using a gel containing 8 M urea, provides denaturing conditions in which the proteins are converted into their constituent polypeptides and the solubility of hydrophobic proteins is considerably increased. Denaturing conditions are mainly chosen for separating highly hydrophobic proteins. For separations under denaturing conditions the gel must contain 8 M u r e a . 16,17 The isoelectric points measured in urea gels are different from those in native gels. Therefore, information about the urea content of an IEF run is an important part of the definition of an isoelectric point of a protein. In order to avoid crystallization of urea, gels must be run at 20~ At temperatures higher than 20~ formation of isocyanate from breakdown of urea can result in differential carbamylation of proteins leading to artifactual bands. For this reason, temperatures greater than 30~ should be particularly avoided. Carbamylation can also occur, when urea of low purity or old urea solutions are used. Urea IEF gels are mainly employed for the separation of proteins with poor solubility. An interesting example is IEF of caseins as the official method to detect quantitatively how much cows' milk might be illegally used for the production of goats' milk and feta cheese. 18 As shown by Jenne et al. 19 and by Altland and Hackler, 2~ with a denaturing urea gradient perpendicular to the pH gradient in a slab gel protein oligomers and protein-protein-additives can be studied. When non-ionic or zwitterionic detergents have to be included for solubilization of very hydrophobic proteins, polymerization of gels on support film is not efficient and can result in the separation of gel and foil during lEE Moreover, handling of these gels is almost impossible. Using dehydrated gels solves the problem. Reductants cannot be included in gel monomer mixtures, because these reagents inhibit the gel polymerization. If it is necessary or desired to include them during an IEF run, only prepolymerized, dehydrated gels can be used. For the analysis of temperature-sensitive proteins and proteinenzyme complexes at sub-zero temperatures it is possible to polymerize gels with 37% dimethylformamide 21 to prevent freezing of the matrix.

5

SLAB GEL IEF

103

When samples with different protein concentrations and salt loads are applied on slab gels, the different conductivities in the adjacent lanes can lead to strongly distorted iso-pH lines. Addition of 10% sucrose or 10% ethylene glycol to the polymerization or rehydratation solution reduces this effect and leads to straighter band patterns. In order to optimize the resolution in certain pH zones, gradients can be modified by adding amphoteric separator compounds to the carrier ampholytes. For instance, adding 0.33M/3-alanine to a pH gradient of 6 to 8 and running IEF at 15~ increases the resolution close to the major haemoglobin band HbA in order to detect the glycosylated variant HbAlc in the area around pH 7.15. 22 See Righetti's book 6 for a comprehensive overview on pH gradient modification for the separation of hemoglobin variants. 6. Sample Properties

(a) Salt Effects: In general, IEF runs are sensitive to salt. When samples with different salt concentrations are applied in adjacent lanes of slab gels, the band patterns can show wavy iso-pH lines. This is especially true for gradients generated with carrier ampholytes, so it is best to limit the salt concentration to 50 mM or less. If the salt concentration is too high, the sample should be dialysed against 1% glycine or 1% carrier ampholytes, or desalted with a gel filtration column. For the case that only very small sample amounts are available and dialysis or gel filtration is impractical, adjustment of all samples to the same salt content by diluting them with salt solutions can often solve the problem. In this case, a longer sample entrance phase with low voltage should be applied in order to transport the salt ions into the electrode strips without overheating the gel. (b) Double One-Dimensional Electrophoresis: In double onedimensional electrophoresis, 19,2~ two different types of slab gel electrophoretic separations are combined as described in the following example. Multiple samples of human serum sample were first fractionated by IEF in a slab gel. A strip containing the IgG fractions was cut out across all sample lanes and transferred onto the stacking gel surface of a flatbed discontinuous electrophoresis gel in order to separate the low-molecularweight components from the bulk of IgG. This technique, which can also be run in the reversed sequence, allows phenotyping using complex protein samples from human and other species with high throughput. When urea IEF gels are used, even SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis can be run in the first dimension as shown in Reference 20. 7. Running Conditions For an IEF run, the film- or glass-supported gel slabs are placed on the cooling plate of the IEF apparatus that has been coated with kerosene for optimal temperature transfer. Water or detergent solutions are not

104

R.WESTERMEIER

recommended as contact fluids, since they often accumulate some ions by diffusion and become conductive, leading to diversion of the electric field and sparking along the lateral edges of the gels at high voltages. For non-washed gels and for washed gels with long separation time IEF, as well as for basic gradients and urea gels, filter paper strips soaked in electrode solutions are required between the gel edges and the electrodes. The filter strips provide reservoirs for ionic contaminants in the gels and should be 0.5-1 mm thick and 5 mm wide. Table 1 shows recommended electrode solutions for 0.5 mm thick polyacrylamide gels run with different pH gradients. Native IEF gels are usually run at 10~ and denaturing IEF gels containing 8 M urea are run at 20~ Since the isoelectric points of proteins are dependent on temperature, for consistency, it is best to run IEF slab gels at controlled temperature and to provide the temperature information as part of the definition of the isoelectric point. The pH gradient should be established before the samples are loaded. Therefore, a prefocusing step is necessary to move the carrier ampholytes to their isoelectric points. Samples are applied with small applicator pieces of a cotton/cellulose mixture or with silicone rubber applicator masks or frames following prefocusing. It is highly recommended to evaluate the optimal application point on the pH gradient in an initial trial test. ~2 Sample applicator pieces should be removed after the sample entrance phase, but applicator masks or frames can remain on the gel surface during the focusing run. Filter paper is not recommended for sample application, because some proteins irreversibly stick to it and are not released even at high-electric field strengths. TABLE

I

Electrode Solutions for IEF in 0.5-mmThin Polyacrylamide Gels

pH gradient

Anode

Cathode

3.5-9.5 2.5-4.5 2.5-4.5 3.5-5.0

0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5 mol/L NaOH 2% (w/v) ampholytes, pH 5-7 0.4 mol/L HEPES 2% (w/v) ampholytes, pH 6-8

4.0-5.0 4.0-6.5 4.5-7.0 5.0-6.5 5.5-7.0 5.0-8.0

0.5 mol/L H3PO 4 0.5 mol/L acetic acid 0.5 mol/L acetic acid 0.5 mol/L acetic acid 2% (w/v) ampholytes, pH 4-6 0.5 mol/L acetic acid

1 mol/L glycine 0.5 mol/L NaOH 0.5 mol/L NaOH 0.5 mol/L NaOH 0.5 mol/L NaOH 0.5 mol/L NaOH

6.0-8.5 7.8-10.0 8.5-11.0

2% (w/v) ampholytes, pH 4-6 2% (w/v) ampholytes, pH 6-8 0.2 mol/L histidine

0.5 mol/L NaOH 1 mol/L NaOH 1 mol/L NaOH

mol/L H3PO 4 mol/L H3PO 4 mol/L H3PO 4 mol/L H3PO 4

5

SLABGEl_IEF

105

When more than 20 ~L of sample solution is applied, plastic application flames are very useful. These frames can be prepared by cutting the bottom away from disposable photometer cuvettes. The frames are placed on the gel surface, with the smooth edges down, before prefocusing and remain on the gel throughout the entire separation time. In order to prevent leakage, it is a good idea to dip the smooth edges into a puddle of 100% glycerol before placement on the gel. During sample entry the voltage must be kept low to prevent aggregation and precipitation of the proteins. When the carrier ampholyte pH gradient is established, the conductivity in the gels becomes rather low. Thus, the electric conditions are best controlled with the voltage settings in the power supply. The closer proteins come to their isoelectric points, the less charged they become. This means, that high electric field strength is required to drive the lightly charged proteins to their isoelectric point and keep them focused there.

8. High-Throughput Analysis Slab gel IEF is a useful technique for the analysis of large sample numbers. It is easy to apply multiple samples into sample applicator masks on horizontal flatbed gels with microplate-compatible multipipettes. This is, in fact, much easier to perform than sample application on vertical electrophoresis gels. One way to double sample throughput is by positioning a single cathode at the center of the gel slab with two anodes, one on each of the two long edges of the gel parallel to the cathode as shown in Figure 5. For this kind of application, the settings for the power supply have to be modified as compared with the standard settings: to double the current and half the voltage. This is because the configuration establishes two electrical current paths, but halves the

FIGURE 5

Schematic drawing of a setup for high-throughput slab gel IEF.

106

R.WESTERMEIER

inter-electrode distance. The settings for power stays the same, because it is the product of voltage and current.

D. Protein Detection I. Staining

The challenge for staining IEF gels is the fixation of the proteins in the large pore gels, while at the same time efficiently removing the carrier ampholytes. The carrier ampholytes contain primary amino groups and can therefore bind protein stains. Two ways of staining IEF gels with Coomassie Brilliant Blue are employed: (1) The traditional procedure by fixing the gel with 20% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 dissolved in 40% methanol and 10% acetic acid, with subsequent destaining with 25% methanol and 10% acetic acid. (2) Staining with colloidal Coomassie Brilliant blue G-250 according to Diezel et al. 23 or Blakesley and Boezi. 24 This procedure fixes small proteins and oligopeptides more efficiently than the traditional method, and it is almost odorless. Fluorescent dyes have the advantage of a wide linear dynamic range, which allows very reliable quantification. The most sensitive fluorescent dye for IEF is SYPRO Ruby 2s (Available from Molecular Probes/Invitrogen, Bio-Rad). However, a fluorescence scanner or a UV table and a camera are needed for visualization. A number of silver staining methods exist for IEF gels. The most sensitive variant is the ammoniacal silver stain, which is used to detect unconcentrated oligoclonal IgG in cerebrospinal fluid according to Wurster. 4s The protocol for this method can also be found in Reference 12. 2. Zymogram Detection

When enzymes or enzyme inhibitors are separated by IEF under native conditions, they can be detected by active zymogram staining, which is performed by placing the gel into the appropriate substrate solution and coupling the enzymatic reaction with a dye reaction. In most cases, the protocols described for histological studies and electrophoretic separations 26,27work also for IEF gels. Here it is very useful to use prepolymerized, washed gels and short separation distances, because enzyme activities can suffer by contact with catalysts, non-reacted monomers, and long time exposure to the separation matrix. 3. Immunofixation

When IEF gels of 0.5 mm and less thickness are used, selected protein species can be fixed and detected by immunofixation with specific polyclonal antibodies. This detection method also enhances sensitivity. As an example, two silver stained band patterns of human serum and

5

SLAB GEL IEF

107

F I G U R E 6 IEF of human sera and cerebrospinal fluid in small polyacrylamide gels. Detection of proteins was with silver staining after fixing all proteins with trichloroacetic acid (left) and after fixing only the immunoglobulins by immunofixation with anti-lgG (right). Sample applied on the left gel, 4 IJL - 80 ng IgG lane, sample applied on the right gel, I IJL - 2 0 ng IgG/lane (IgG concentration was measured with nephelometry).

cerebrospinal fluid separated in small polyacrylamide gels are shown in Figure 6. The same samples were applied to the two gels, but at different volumes: 4 }.tL of each sample were applied on the trichloroacetic acid fixed gel and 1 laL per sample on the immuno-fixed gel. Immunofixation is mostly employed with agarose gels.

4. Immunoblotting Electroblotting of proteins from IEF gels is problematic because the soft gels are generally supported on film supports, and the proteins are uncharged at their isoelectric points and must acquire charges to allow for electrophoretic transfer. Towbin et al. 28 described a very efficient procedure for immunoblotting of focusing gels using pressure transfer. 5. Isoelectric Point Markers

For native IEF, the isoelectric points of the focused proteins can be determined with the help of a calibration curve, established by plotting the known isoelectric points of co-focused marker proteins over the gel distance. If marker proteins disturb the focusing patterns or when denaturing conditions are used, non-protein low-molecular weight compounds, such as amphoteric dyes, 29 have been used.

E. Immobilized pH Gradients

Immobilized pH gradients are prepared by co-polymerizing acrylamide derivatives of buffer compounds containing acidic and basic groups with the polyacrylamide network. 3~The gradient-forming buffers

108

R.WESTERMEIER

become grafted directly into the polyacrylamide gel matrix. Immobilized pH gradient gels are cast in essentially the same manner as used for casting porosity gradient gels using recipes and methods which are published, for instance, in the IPG book by Righetti 31 and in Reference 32 (see also Chapter 4 of this book). With current chemistries, IEF in immobilized pH gradients is restricted to polyacrylamide gels. Although it is conceivable to create immobilized pH gradients in agarose gels using agarose-buffer derivatives, charged agarose chains would separate from each other under the influence of the electric field and the gel matrix would be destroyed. The concept of using fixed buffering groups in polyacrylamide slab gels allows creation of extremely flat pH gradients down to 0.02 pH units/cm for very high resolution. 33 Because the buffering groups are fixed and cannot migrate like carrier ampholytes, these gels have a very low conductivity allowing use of very high electric fields. Most importantly, they are not subject to cathode drift and can be run for the extended times at high voltage necessary for focusing many proteins. Immobilized pH gradient gels are cast on support films and washed with water after polymerization. It is important to remove all mobile ions from the gel matrices before use to prevent their build up at the electrodes with subsequent shortening of the gradients. During the washing process, the gels swell considerably which aids in clearing away mobile ions. Washed gels are then dried down to paper-thin films and rehydrated before use. Rehydration is done either in glass cassettes or in plastic trays with a defined liquid volume. Immobilized pH gradient slab gels are usually 0.5 mm thick; thicker gels are more complicated to wash, dry, and rehydratate. Because the buffering groups are grafted to the gel, no adverse effects occur when holes are punched into the gel for improved sample application. This measure is advantageous for detergent-containing samples and prevents lateral band spreading for samples with a high molar urea cont e n t . 34 Furthermore, there are no lateral effects in IEF when the gel slabs are cut into narrow (3-4 mm wide) strips before rehydration. IPG strips have become the standard medium for denaturing IEF as the first dimension in high-resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis. 35 V. AGAROSE GELS

Catsimpoolas 36 was first to use agarose slab gels for IEF: he poured agarose gels on standard microscope slides to form 2-mm-thick layers. For sample application, a small pit was made in the middle of the layer. The advantages of agarose are the absence of polymerization catalysts and the large pore size, which allows larger molecules to migrate without restrictions. The agarose polysaccharide forms hydrogen-bonded double

5

SLAB GEL IEF

109

helices, which join laterally and create relatively thick filaments, resulting in large pore size gels with good mechanical stability. Thus, it is the ideal matrix for separating large proteins like IgA and IgM. Electroendosmosis problems prevented the agarose-gel method from becoming widely accepted during the early stages of its development. About 10 years after the first experiments, agaroses with very low electroendosmosis have been available from several different suppliers. One approach to reducing electroendosmotic effects is through the removal of sulfonic acid groups from the agarose chains. 37 A stronger electroendosmosis suppression effect is achieved by compensating of acidic groups with addition of alkaline groups. However, completely electroendosmosis-free agarose does not exist. Therefore, it is important to include 10% (w/v) sorbitol in the gels, which reduces the electroendosmotic water flow considerably by increasing the viscosity of the gel solution.

A. Gel Preparation An agarose IEF gel is prepared by heating aqueous 10% sorbitol to boiling, and then adding 0.8% (w/v) agarose powder. After the agarose has melted, the mixture is cooled to about 78~ and carrier ampholytes are added. This mixture is pipetted into a glass cassette with a 0.5 mm thick gasket. One glass plate is covered with a special polyester foil (GelBond; available from Amersham Biosiences, Bio-Rad, Cambrex Bio Science), to which the agarose gel binds. After the gel has solidified, the gel-foil layer is removed from the cassette and placed overnight in a humidity chamber in a refrigerator. This treatment is necessary to allow the final desired agarose structure to form. Agarose-urea gels are not practically possible, because urea disrupts the hydrogen bonding of the filaments, thereby producing a very soft matrix.

B. Running Conditions For agarose focusing, the electrode solutions are different from those used for polyacrylamide gels (see Table 2). Because of electroendosmotic effects, for agarose gels, the use of sample applicator pieces is not recommended; only sample applicator masks should be employed. During IEF some electroendosmotic effects are usually observed: the anodal electrode strip dries out and needs to be replaced by a new one after 30 min; at the same time the cathodal strip becomes very wet and should be dried with filter paper. Usually the separation is run at 10~ but cryoproteins, like IgM, would precipitate at low temperatures and are therefore run at 37~

I I0

R.WESTERMEIER TABLE 2

Electrode Solutions (MoI/L) for IEF in Agarose Gels

pH gradient

Anode

Cathode

3.5-9.5

0.25 acetic acid

0.25 NaOH

2.5-4.5

0.25 acetic acid

0.4 HEPES

4.0-6.5

0.25 acetic acid

0.25 NaOH

5.0-8.0

0.04 glutamic acid

0.25 NaOH

C. Protein Detection I. Staining

After fixation with 20% trichloroacetic acid, the agarose IEF gel is first washed twice with 10% acetic acid and 25% methanol in water and then dried by placing some layers of filter paper on its surface and pressing the gel with a glass plate under 1-2 kg weight for 10 min. After the gel has been completely dried in a heating cabinet, it can be stained similar to polyacrylamide gel. Because agarose gels will not reswell in staining solutions, staining and destaining of dried thin layers works much faster than for thicker gel layers. If silver staining is required, a one-step colloidal staining method for dried gels is employed. 38 Silver staining of agarose gels had already been introduced 8 years before silver staining of polyacrylamide gels. 39 However, the sensitivity of this technique is considerably lower than the method used for polyacrylamide gels. 2. Immunofixation

Agarose gels are the ideal matrices for immunofixation, because the pore sizes are large enough for the antibody molecules to diffuse into the gel layer. Figure 7 shows a separation of neuraminidase treated human sera after immunofixation with polyclonal antibodies against plasminogen isoenzymes and subsequent Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining according to Leifheit et al. 4~ VI. DEXTRAN GELS

Delincee and Radola 41 introduced the granulated dextran gel as an anticonvective medium for IEE The method is particularly useful for preparative applications 42 in up to 10-mm-thick Sephadex gel beds. Granulated beds of Sephadex are free of catalysts and have almost no retardation effect. Slurries of dextran are poured into metal or plastic frames to form rectangular beds. Electrode contact is made at the ends of the beds and samples are pipetted directly onto the bed. Optimal use of granulated beds is critically dependent on the correct water content of the slurry: if it is too wet, it will not act as an anticonvective medium,

5

SLAB GEL IEF

I I I

F I G U R E 7 IEF of neuraminidase-treated human sera in an agarose gel with a pH gradient 5-8. Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining after immunofixation with polyclonal antibodies against plasminogen isoenzymes (reproduced after Leifheit et al.4~

and if it is too dry, the gel bed will crack during the run. After focusing, the proteins are detected by blotting the surface of the bed with a filter paper and staining this print with a protein detection dye such as Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Protein bands identified on the print are first bracketed by segments of a horizontal grid that fits inside the slurry frame. The slurry containing the bands of interest are simply scooped out with a spatula and the proteins are separated from the slurry beads by centrifugation or filtration. Ziegler and K6hler 43 combined the benefits of granulated gels for focusing very large proteins without steric hindrance with the ease of handling polymerized gels. They mixed acrylamide and crosslinker into the Sephadex slurry and polymerized the gel after IEF by spraying TEMED and ammonium persulfate onto the gel. The proteins are visualized by staining, but cannot be further analyzed because they become modified and fixed into the matrix by the polymerization process. Lately, the technique of IEF in granulated gels has experienced a revival as a very useful method for prefractionation of complex protein mixtures according to the isoelectric points for high-resolution twodimensional electrophoresis in proteomics. 44

VII. EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOLS:POLYACRYLAMIDESLAB GEL IEF A. Carrier Ampholyte Polyacrylamide Gel IEF

The standard protocol for slab gel IEF is presented here.

I 12

R.WESTERMEIER I. Equipment

Multiphor (see Figure 2), Casting Cassette, GelBond PAG, Power Supply capable of delivering 3000V at >5 mA, Recirculating Chiller, Staining Tray, etc. 2. Gel Casting

(a) Stock Solutions Carrier Ampholytes:

Carrier ampholytes are usually supplied as 40% (w/v) solutions, although some narrow range carrier ampholytes are supplied at 20% (w/v). Some suppliers do not specify the dry weight content of their ampholytes. In the recipe shown in Table 3, it is assumed that the carrier ampholyte stock is at 40% (w/v). Acrylamide, Bis solution ( T = 4 0 % , C = 3%): Dissolve 38.8g of acrylamide and 1.2 g of N,N'-methylenbisacrylamide, in 60-70mL of distilled, deionized water. Stir until all grains have dissolved, then filter the solution through paper. When stored in a dark place at 4~ (refrigerator), the solution can be kept for 1 week. This solution is commercially available from several suppliers. Caution! Acrylamide and N,N'-methylenbisacrylamide are toxic in the monomer form. Avoid skin contact and do not pipette by mouth. Ammonium Persulfate Solution 40% (w/v): Dissolve 400mg of ammonium persulfate in i ml of distilled water.This solution is stable for 1 week when stored in the refrigerator (4~ TEMED (N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine) is not necessarily needed for polymerization. However, since carrier ampholytes from different suppliers can be chemically very different, TEMED should be added in order to guarantee polymerization effectiveness and consistency. TEMED is used neat. It should not be older than 1 year and should be kept in the refrigerator. (b) Preparation of the Cassette: Pour a few milliliters of distilled water on the blank glass plate and place the support film (GelBond PAG Film | with the hydrophobic side on the water puddle. Move the film until the short edges are flush with the short edges of the glass plate and one of T A B L E 3 Gel Recipe for a 0 . 5 - m m Thin IEF Slab Gel 5% T, 3% C Gel of 25 x 12 cm

Acrylamide Bis solution (40%T, 3%C) Monoethylenglycol (100%) Carrier ampholytes pH 3-10 (40% w/v) TEMED (100 % ) Distilled water Total

1.9 mL 1.5 mL 750 ~tL 8 gL 10.8 mL 15.0 mL

15 pL ammonium persulfate solution (40% w/v) is added immediately before filling of the cassette

5

SLABGEL IEF

I 13

the long edges protrudes over a long edge of the glass plate by lmm. Press the film down on the glass plate with a roller. Place a U-shaped gasket cut from a 0.5-mm-thick silicone rubber on the film and put another glass plate on top of it. The upper glass plate should be treated once with RepelSilane TM to allow easy removal of the plate from the softgel surface after polymerization. When the sandwich is clamped, it forms a cassette as shown in Figure 8. Tilt the cassette vertically for filling. (c) Polymerization: Prepare fresh monomer solution according to the recipe in Table 3. After thorough mixing of the solution, deaerate it with a vacuum pump for 5 min to remove oxygen. Add 15 laL of ammonium persulfate solution and mix the monomer solution thoroughly, but carefully, without creating bubbles. Immediately pipette the monomer solution into the cassette as shown in Figure 9. A setup like this can also be used for casting agarose gels. Overlay the upper edge of the gel with a few hundred microliters of distilled water to prevent oxygen diffusion into the upper gel. The solution should be allowed to polymerize overnight before the gel is used. The gel can be wrapped in a plastic foil and stored in a refrigerator for several weeks.

3. Sample Preparation For Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining, adjust the protein concentration to around 1-3 mg/mL with distilled water. The salt concentration should not exceed 50mM; apply 10-20~tL to the gel. Also apply 10l.tL of pI marker proteins (pH 3-10) to at least two lanes.

4. Isoelectric Focusing In Figure 3 a schematic setup for slab gel IEF is shown. Set the temperature of the thermostatic circulator to 10~ Pipette 3 ml of kerosene on the cooling plate. Remove the gel from the cassette and place it on the

F I G U R E 8 Assembly of a cassette for casting an IEF slab gel on a film support.The U-shaped gasket can also be glued to the surface of the upper glass plate.

I 14

R.WESTERMEIER

I

F I G U R E 9 Pipetting the monomer solution into the cassette for the polymerization of an IEF slab gel.

I

T A B L E 4 Power Supply Settings for a 0.5-mmThin IEF Slab Gel 5% T, 3% C Gel of 25 x 12 cm Time (min)

Maximal voltage (V)

Maximal current (mA)

Maximal power (VV)

Prefocusing

20

700

20

10

Sample entrance Separation

30 90

500 2000

20 20

10 10

Band focusing

10

2500

5

15

cooling plate with the gel facing upward. The kerosene should distribute uniformly under the gel's support foil. (a) Electrode Strips: Soak one electrode strip with 0.5 M phosphoric acid and place it on the anodal edge of the gel layer. Soak a second electrode strip with 0.5 M sodium hydroxide and place it on the cathodal edge. Blot excess liquid from the electrode strips with filter paper before applying them to the gel. (b) Focusing: The power supply settings are listed in Table 4. Figure 10 shows several ways to apply sample to a flatbed gel. Mode 1 is only recommended for agarose gels; mode 2 shows sample applicator pieces, which can be applied after the prefocusing phase; for modes 3 and 4 the silicon rubber application masks or glass rings should be applied before prefocusing to avoid leaking of the sample, because the formation of ridges on the gel surface can already start in this phase. The choice of the

5

SLABGEL IEF

I 15

F I G U R E 10 Different means of sample application on a flat-bed slab gel for IEF. From Reference 32. (I) Direct application as a droplet, (2) applicator pieces, (3) silicon rubber application mask, (4) glass rings.

optimal sample application mode is dependent on the sample and should be tested for each new sample type. The position of the optimal sample application point is dependent on the kind of sample and should be selected with the help of a reference in the literature or laboratory manual, or must be determined with a step trial test (see above). In general, do not apply samples where they are expected to focus. Remove the sample applicator pieces after the sample entry phase; the masks or glass rings should remain on the gel surface. Run the phases for separation and band sharpening consecutively without interruption. 5. Protein Detection by Colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue Staining The following colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining procedure is the most useful for IEF slab gels, as explained above: Dissolve 2g of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 in 1 L of distilled water Add 1 L of 1 M sulfuric acid (1 M; 55.5 mL of concentrated H2SO 4 per liter) while stirring. After further stirring for 3 h, filter the solution through paper, and then add 220 mL of 10 M sodium hydroxide (10 M; 88 g NaOH in 220 mL) to the brown filtrate. Finally, add 310mL of 100% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and mix well. The solution will turn green. Colloidal sols of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 are commercially available for protein staining. Fixing and staining is performed in one step: 3 h at 50~ or overnight at room temperature in the colloidal sol. Later the acid is washed out by soaking the gel in water for 1-2h. The green bands become blue and more intense as the water drives the dye molecules into the proteins. B. Immobilized pH Gradient IEF The equipment is the same as for carrier ampholyte IEF gels.

I 16

R.WESTERMEIER I. Equipment

Multiphor (see Figure 2), Casting Cassette, Gradient Maker, GelBond PAG, Power Supply capable of delivering >3000 V with the minimum current safety switch turned off, Recirculating Chiller, Staining Tray, 2. Gel Casting

Preparation of immobilized pH gradient gels is much more complicated and prone to errors than making laboratory-cast carrier-ampholyte IEF gels. Only a small selection of ready-made IPG gel slabs is commercially available (from Amersham Biosciences only). Therefore, the entire procedure is described here. (a) Stock Solutions Immobiline | II 0.2 molar stock solutions: Acids: pK-3.6, 4.6. Bases: pK-6.2, 7.0, 8.5, and 9.3. The solutions are stabilized against autopolymerization and hydrolysis and have a shelflife of at least 12 months when stored in the refrigerator (4-8~ Immobilines | II should not be frozen! Acrylamide, Bis solution ( T = 4 0 % , C = 3 % ) : Dissolve 38.8g of acrylamide and 1.2 g of N,N'-methylenbisacrylamide, in 60-70 mL of distilled, deionized water. Stir until all grains have dissolved, then filter the solution through paper. When stored in a dark place at 4~ (refrigerator) the solution can be kept for 1 week. This solution is commercially available from several suppliers. Caution! Acrylamide and N,N'-methylenbisacrylamide are toxic in the monomer form. Avoid skin contact and do not pipette by mouth. Ammonium persulfate solution 40% (w/v): Dissolve 400mg of ammonium persulfate in I mL of distilled water. This solution is stable for one week when stored in the refrigerator

(4oc). TEMED (N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine) (100%): TEMED should not be older than 1 year and should be kept in the refrigerator. 4 M HCl: Dissolve 33.0 mL of concentrated HC1 in 67.0mL of distilled water. (b) Preparation of the Cassette: Pour a few milliliters of distilled water on the blank glass plate and place the support film (GelBond PAG Film| with the hydrophobic side on the water puddle. Move the film until the short edges are flush with the short edges of the glass plate and one of the long edges protrudes over a long edge of the glass plate by lmm. Press the film down on the glass plate with a roller. Place a U-shaped gasket cut from a 0.5-mm-thick silicone rubber on the film and put another glass plate on top of it. The upper glass plate should be treated once with RepelSilane TM to allow easy removal of the plate from the soft gel surface after polymerization. When the sandwich is clamped, it forms a cassette as shown in Figure 8. Chill the cassette in a refrigerator in order to delay the

5

I 17

SLAB GEL IEF

start of polymerization. This measure is taken to ensure ~hat the density gradient has settled before polymerization begins. Note that settling of a gradient in a 0.5-mm-thin cassette is much slower than for a l m m cassette. (c) Casting a pH Gradient Gel and Polymerization: Immobilized pH gradients are cast in a similar way as porosity or additive gradient gels. A large number of Immobiline recipes are found in References 31 and 32. Prepare two flesh monomer solutions according to Table 5. The pH gradient is stabilized by a glycerol density gradient. The gradient maker consists of two communicating chambers (Figure 11). First the light, basic, solution is pipetted into the rear cylinder, the channel between the cylinders is opened very briefly and immediately closed again to fill up the channel with light solution, thus avoiding an air bubble barrier between the two solutions. The dense, acidic solution and a stirrer bar are placed in the front cylinder, the mixing chamber. A compensation bar is placed into the rear cylinder, the reservoir, to balance the volume of the magnetic stirrer and the difference in density: 25% glycerol is added to the dense solution and 5% to the light one so that it is easier to overlay the gel solution in the cassette with water before polymerization. The casting cassette is removed from the refrigerator and placed close to the gradient maker, with the glass plate holding the film facing I

TABLE 5 Recipe for Starting Solutions for one 0.5-mm Thick IPG Gel (pH 4 to 10),T-4%,C-3%of25x 12cm Solutions Immobiline pK 3.6 Immobiline pK 4.6 Immobiline pK 6.2 Immobiline pK 7.0 Immobiline pK 8.5 Immobiline pK 9.3 Acrylamide Bis solution (40% T, 3% C) Glycerol (87 %) TEMED (100 %) Fill up with distilled water mix carefully and measure the pH with pH paper

pH 4.0 (Dense)

pH 10.0 (Light)

551 BL

m 57 BL

227 BL 45 BL 167 BL

25 pL 244 BL 79 BL 179 BL 750 BL 400 pL 4 BL to 7.5 mL

I

750 pL 2.2 mL 4 pL to 7.5 mL

With 4 mol/L HC1, titrate to pH 7

10 pL*

With TEMED, titrate to pH 7 Total

7.5 mL

7.5 mL

Ammonium persulfate solution (40% w/v) is added in the gradient maker immediately before filling the cassette

8 BL

8 pL

*Experimental values.

8 pL*

118

R.WESTERMEIER

F I G U R E I I Casting a linear pH gradient gel with a gradient maker.The gradient settles after about 10 min.

the operator. This allows a better control of the tip of the tubing, which is inserted into the center of the cassette between the upper edges. At this time, the ammonium persulfate is added and mixed first with the dense solution by briefly turning on the magnetic stirring motor, and second with the light solution using the compensation bar. The magnetic stirrer motor is turned on and adjusted to a speed producing a small vortex is obtained. Fast rotation must be avoided in order to prevent the development of air bubbles. The channel between the chambers is opened and the clamp at the front tubing is released. The gel solution will flow into the cassette through the tubing under the influence of gravity. Overlay the upper edge of the gel with a few hundred microliters of distilled water to prevent oxygen diffusion into the upper gel. Do not use alcohol-containing overlay solutions. The gel is allowed to polymerize for 2 h at room temperature. At first the gradient will not be straight. It takes about 10min for the gradient to settle completely (see Figure 11). (d) Gel Washing, Drying, and Rehydratation: Remove the gel from the cassette and wash it four times for 15 min, each in 0.5 L of distilled water, on a shaker. In order to avoid curling of the drying gel, incubate it for another 15 min in 1.5% (v/v) glycerol in distilled water. Dry the gel at room temperature in a dust-free cabinet. When the gel is dry, immediately cover it with an inert plastic film and store it in a plastic bag in a freezer. Rehydratation can either be performed in a vertical cassette or in a reswelling tray as shown in Figure 12. The vertical rehydration cassette also allows rehydration with an urea gradient perpendicular to the pH gradient as described in Reference 19. The gel casting cassette can also

5

SLABGEL IEF

I 19

FIGURE 12 Methods for rehydratation of an IPG gel: (a) rehydration cassette; (b) reswelling tray.

be used for rehydratation. When the gel is just rehydrated in distilled water, the matrix is completely reconstituted.

3. Sample Preparation For Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining, adjust the protein concentration to around 1-3 mg/mL with distilled water. The salt concentration should not exceed 50 mM. Apply 10-20 gL to the gel. Apply 10 gL of pI marker proteins (pH 3-10) to at least two lanes. 4. Isoelectric Focusing In Figure 3 a schematic setup for slab gel IEF is shown. Set the temperature of the thermostatic circulator to 10~ Pipette 3 mL of kerosene on the cooling plate. Place the gel on the cooling plate with the gel facing upward, and with the acidic side at the anode. The kerosene should distribute uniformly under the gel's support foil. Usually no electrode strips are needed. (a) Sample Application: For focusing in IPG gels, the sample must be applied without prefocusing in order to use the initial current to transport the sample proteins into the gel. All sample application modes shown in Figure 10 can be used. Additionally, in IPG gel IEF, holes can be punched into the gel because the gradient is fixed. Also, in IPG gels, the position of the optimal sample application point is dependent on the kind of sample and should be selected with the help of a reference in the literature or laboratory manual, or must be determined with a step trial test. (b) Focusing: For IPG gels, 10~ is the optimal temperature. When 8M urea has been added to the rehydration solution, 20~ is chosen. Because the pH gradient is already established in the gel, the power supply settings are very simple: one phase with the maximum set to 3500 V, 1.0 mA and 5.0 W. The minimum separation time is dependent on the pH

120

R.WESTERMEIER

gradient. For non-denaturing IEF it is suggested to use 5 h; even in narrow-interval pH gradients all proteins will have focused by this time. Because the gradient cannot drift, the pattern remains stable. 5. Protein Detection See the carrier ampholyte IEF procedure.

REFERENCES 1. Svensson, H. Isoelectric fractionation, analysis, and characterization of ampholytes in natural pH gradients. III. Description of apparatus for electrolysis in columns stabilized by density gradients and direct determination of isoelectric points. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (suppl. 1):132-138, 1962. 2. Wrigley, C. W. Analytical fractionation of plant and animal proteins by gel electrofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 36:362-365, 1968. 3. Dale, G. and Latner, A. L. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Lancet 20: 847-848, 1968. 4. Awdeh, Z. L., Williamson, A. R. and Askonas, B. A. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels and its application to immunoglobulins. Nature 219:66-67, 1968. 5. Leaback, D. H. and Rutter, A. C. Polyacrylamide-isoelectric-focusing: a new technique for the electrophoresis of proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 32:447-453, 1968. 6. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing: theory, methodology and applications. In Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Work, T. S. and Burdon, R. H. Eds.), Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp. 152-198, 1983. 7. Finlayson, G. R. and Chrambach, A. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel and its preparative application. Anal. Biochem. 40:292-311, 1971. 8. Righetti, P. G. and Drysdale, J. W. Isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 236:17-28, 1971. 9. Vesterberg, O. Synthesis and isoelectric fractionation of carrier ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand. 23:2653-2666, 1969. 10. Caglio, S. and Righetti, P. G. On the pH dependence of polymerization efficiency, as investigated by capillary zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 14:554-558, 1993. 11. Robinson, H. K. Comparison of different techniques for isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gel slabs using bacterial asparaginases. Anal. Biochem. 49:353-366, 1972. 12. Westermeier, R. Method 6: PAGIEF in rehydrated gels. In Electrophoresis in Practice, 3rd ed., WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 171-182, 2001. 13. G6rg, A., Postel, W. and Westermeier, R. Isoelectric focusing in ultrathin-layer polyacrylamide gels on cellophane. Anal. Biochem. 89:60-70, 1978. 14. Radola, B. J. Ultra-thin-layer isoelectric focusing in 50-100 ~tm polyacrylamide gels on silanized glass plates or polyester films. Electrophoresis 1:43-56, 1980. 15. Gianazza, E., Chillemi, E, Gelfi, C. and Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric focusing of oligopeptides: detection by specific stains. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 1:237-251, 1979. 16. Creighton, T. E. Electrophoretic analysis of the unfolding of proteins by urea. J. Mol. Biol. 129:235-264, 1979. 17. Ui, N. Isoelectric points and confirmation of proteins. 1. Effect of urea on the behaviour of some proteins in isoelectric focusing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 229:567-581, 1971. 18. Lamberty, A., Krause, I., Kramer, G. N., Pauwels, J. and Glaeser, H. The certification of two reference materials to be used for the detection of cow milk casein in cheeses from ewes milk, goats milk and mixtures of ewes and goats milk. In Bcr Information, European Commission EUR 17254 EN, 1996.

5

SLABGEL IEF

121

19. Jenne, D. E., Denzel, K., Bl~itzinger, E, Winter, E, Obermaier, B., Linke, R. P. and Altland, K. A new isoleucine substitution of Val-20 in transthyretin tetramers selectively impairs dimer-dimer contacts and causes systemic amyloidosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:6302-6307, 1996. 20. Altland, K. and Hackler, R. Concept and applications of double one-dimensional slab gel electrophoresis. In Electrophoresis "84 (Neuhoff, V. Ed.) Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp. 362-378, 1984. 21. Perella, M., Heyda, A., Mosca, A. and Rossi-Bernardi, L. Isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis at subzero temperatures. Anal. Biochem. 88:212-224, 1978. 22. Jeppson, J. O., Franzen, B. and Nilsson, V. O. Determination of the glycosylated hemoglobin fraction HbAlc in diabetes mellitus by thin-layer electrofocusing. Sci. Tools 25:69-73, 1978. 23. Diezel, W., Kopperschlfiger, G. and Hofmann, E. An improved procedure for protein staining in polyacrylamide gels with a new type of Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Anal. Biochem. 48:617-620, 1972. 24. Blakesley, R. W. and Boezi, J. A. A new staining technique for proteins in polyacrylamide gels using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G 250. Anal. Biochem. 82:580-582, 1977. 25. Berggren, K. N., Schulenberg, B., Lopez, M. E, Steinberg, T. H., Bogdanova, A., Smejkal, G., Wang, A. and Patton, W. E An improved formulation of SYPRO Ruby protein gel stain: comparison with the original formulation and with a ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) formulation. Proteomics 2:486-498, 2002. 26. Rothe, G. M. Electrophoresis of Enzymes. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1994. 27. Manchenko, G. P. Detection of Enzymes on Electrophoretic Gels. A Handbook. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1994. 28. Towbin, H., Ozbey, O. and Zingel, O. An immunoblotting method for high-resolution isoelectric focusing of protein isoforms on immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 22:1887-1893, 2001. 29. glais, K. and Friedl, Z. Low-molecular weight pI markers for isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. A, 661:249-256, 1994. 30. Bjellqvist, B., Ek, K., Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., G6rg, A., Westermeier, R. and Postel, W. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: principle, methodology and some applications. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 6:317-339, 1982. 31. Righetti, P. G. Immobilized pH gradients: theory and methodology. In Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Burdon, R. H. and van Knippenberg, P. H. Eds.) Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp. 80-85, 1990. 32. Westermeier, R. Method 10: IEF in immobilized pH gradients. In Electrophoresis in Practice, 3rd ed., WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 223-238, 2001. 33. G6rg, A., Postel, W., Westermeier, R. and Weser, J. Genetic studies with isoelectric focusing in ultranarrow immobilized pH gradients. Sci. Tools 29:23-24, 1982. 34. Loessner, M. J. and Scherer, S. Elimination of sample diffusion and lateral band spreading in isoelectric focusing employing ready-made immobilized pH gradient gels. Electrophoresis 13:461-463, 1992. 35. G6rg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth. G., Harder, A., Scheibe, B., Wildgruber, R. and Weiss, W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:1037-1053, 2000. 36. Catsimpoolas, N. Immunoelectrofocusing in agarose gels. Clin. Chim. Acta 23:237-238, 1969. 37. The Agarose Monograph. FMC Corporation, 1982. 38. Willoughby, E. W. and Lambert, A. A sensitive silver stain for proteins in agarose gels. Anal. Biochem. 130:353-358, 1983. 39. Kerenyi, L. and Gallyas, E A highly sensitive method for demonstrating proteins in electrophoretic, immunoelectrophoretic and immunodiffusion preparations. Clin. Chim. Acta 38:465-467, 1972.

122

P..WESTERMEIEP.

40. Leifheit, H. -J., Howe, J. and Gathof, A. G. Agarose isoelectric focusing for classification of plasminogen variants. In Advances in Forensic Haematogenics 2 (Mayr, W. R. Ed.) Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 202-206, 1987. 41. Delincee, H. and Radola, B. J. Thin-layer isoelectric focusing on Sephadex layers of horseradish peroxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 200:404-407, 1970. 42. Radola, B. J. Isoelectric focusing in layers of granulated gels II. Preparative isoelectric focusing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 386:181-185, 1975. 43. Ziegler, A. and K6hler, G. Analytical isoelectric focusing in polymerizable thin layers containing Sephadex. FEBS Lett. 64:48-51, 1976. 44. G6rg, A., Boguth, G., K6pf, A., Reil, G., Parlar, H. and Weiss, W. Sample prefractionation with Sephadex isoelectric focusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels. Proteomics 2:1652-1657, 2002. 45. Wurster, U. Demonstration of oligoclonal IgG in the unconcentrated cerebrospinal fluid by silver stain. In Etectrophoresis "82 (Stathakos, D. Ed.) W. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 249-259, 1983.

6

TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS M A R K P. M O L L O Y A N D M I C H A E L T. M c D O W E L L

Pfizer Global Research and Development,Molecular Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI 48105

I. INTRODUCTION II. EQUILIBRATION OF FIRST DIMENSION IEF GELS A. Conventional Equilibration B. Nonconventional Equilibration C. Transfer of Proteins Between Gel Dimensions III. SDS-PAGE A. Preparation of Gel Solutions B. Homogeneous Single Percentage GelsVersus Porosity Gradient Gels C. Cross-linking Monomers D. Tris/Glycine/Chloride Buffer System E. Alternate Buffer Systems F. Electrical Considerations in Controlling SDS-PAGE IV. PROTEIN DETECTION A. Labeling Methods B. Staining Methods V. GEL REPRODUCIBILITY VI. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS VII. ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS OF 2-DE VIII. SUMMARY REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) is a bio-analytical technique that provides high-resolution protein separation by integrating two independent electrophoretic separation methods. The first dimension employs the charge-based technique of isoelectric focusing fIEF), while the second step consists of size-based separation using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). As a 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

123

124

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

technique with wide utility, 2-DE has withstood the test of time, having been initially described in 1975,1-3 it remains to date unsurpassed in its capacity to resolve polypeptides. It is the orthogonal separation that provides such high resolving power. As a measure of its capacity, a standard format 2-D gel of a cell lysate typically resolves 1000-2000 individual polypeptides. Because of this high resolving capacity, 2-DE is in regular use for proteomic analyses that aim to study the thousands of proteins in a given sample. 4,5 The system is ideal for qualitative cataloging of the different protein "species" of a biological sample, and it is particularly useful for separating post-translationally modified protein isoforms. Moreover, 2-DE is well suited for quantitative studies of fluxes in protein synthesis and protein abundance. Proteins purified by 2-DE are readily accessible to analytical characterization, nowadays conducted primarily by mass spectrometry (MS). 6,7 With the increasing analytical sensitivity afforded by MS (low femtomolar) and the decoding of several genomes, many of the proteins visualized on 2-D gels can be identified. Some examples of protein separation using 2-DE are shown in Figure 1. The first dimension of 2-DE consists of a protein IEF step as has been thoroughly discussed in Chapters 3 and 4. One of the chief factors to conducting successful IEF, and thus 2-D gels, centers on sample preparation as discussed in Chapter 5. The sample preparation step itself is so important that the success or failure of the 2-D gel can most often be retraced to this step. It is essential that the sample is completely solubilized and free of interfering substances such as salts formed from strong acids and bases (e.g., NaC1, Na2PO4, and KH2PO4) , nucleic acids, and other insoluble biological material. 8 The IEF is most often conducted using either the classical tube gel approach or with immobilized pH gradients (IPGs). 9 Following IEF, the focused proteins are prepared for the second dimension by coating them with the strong anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)--a step referred to as equilibration. SDS imparts a net negative charge on all proteins, which gives them approximately equal mobility in the presence of an electric field. The first dimension IEF gel is then interfaced with a slab SDS-PAGE gel. By virtue of their uniform mobility and the sieving effect of polyacrylamide, proteins are separated according to their molecular weight. Following separation by 2-DE, proteins are visualized by a detection method, which in most cases, allows them to be recovered for further analytical characterization. The following sections provide a detailed discussion of the equilibration, SDS-PAGE, and protein detection steps.

II. EQUILIBRATION OF FIRST DIMENSION IEF GELS The aim of equilibrating the first dimension IEF gels is to prepare the isoelectrically focused proteins for transfer to the second dimension

6

"rWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

F I G U R E I Protein separation using two-dimensional (a) E. co/i, (b) mouse serum, (c) mouse bone marrow.

125

gel electrophoresis:

126

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

SDS-PAGE gel. This is a simple task that involves incubating the IEF gel in a buffered solution containing SDS, urea, and glycerol for approximately 30 min. The technique is discussed in detail below.

A. Conventional Equilibration Proteins that have been initially separated by their intrinsic charge in the first dimension IEF must be equilibrated with an anionic detergent to provide charge for second dimension separation (proteins focused at their pI values are uncharged) and to ensure that polypeptide mass is the primary characteristic defining the separation in the second dimension. The anionic surfactant SDS is chosen for this task. SDS forms complexes with proteins at a ratio of approximately 1.4 g SDS/protein, which overwhelms the intrinsic protein charge, imparting a net negative charge to the SDS-protein complex and giving polypeptides the same overall hydrodynamic shape. 1~ This ensures that all polypeptides have approximately equal mobility when introduced into an electric field. Under these conditions, all proteins migrate as anions, and the mass-based sieving effect of polyacrylamide ensures that proteins are resolved based primarily upon their molecular weight. 11,3~While the molecular weight of most proteins can be approximated following SDS-PAGE (_+10%), in reality, not all proteins bind to SDS with equal efficiency. 12,13 Because several protein characteristics besides molecular weight are involved, the molecular weight of a protein detected on an SDS-PAGE gel does not always agree with its predicted molecular mass. For this reason, masses of proteins determined from SDS-PAGE gels are referred to as apparent molecular weights (Mr). Glycoproteins that characteristically possess a large Stokes radius and considered heterogeneous due to additions of different sugar units are classic examples of proteins that often do not migrate to their predicted molecular weight in SDS-PAGE gels, but rather tend to form vertically elongated spots in 2-D gels 14 (For example, see Figure 1B). Furthermore, proteins that are heavily modified by glycosylation, phosphorylation, or sulfation may have lower SDS binding efficiencies due to charge repression, and their mobilities are often lower than predicted, resulting in higher apparent molecular weights compared with their theoretical predicted value. ~s A second important purpose of the equilibration step is to prepare the proteins for efficient transfer between the IEF gel and the SDS-PAGE gel. This is achieved by resolubilizing proteins from their pI values in the IEF gel and minimizing endoosmotic flow (EOF) during the transfer of proteins between gel dimensions. 16,17Standard equilibration solution consists of 2% SDS, 6 M urea, 20% glycerol, and 0.375 M Tris-HC1 (pH 8.8). Finally, it is a common practice to conduct protein reduction and alkylation steps prior to the transfer of proteins between gel dimensions. Reduction is commonly conducted with 1% dithiothreitol (DTT) added

6

"rWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

127

to the equilibration solution and alkylation is done with 2.5-3% iodoacetamide replacing DTT (15 min each). This provides improved protein solubility by minimizing polypeptide aggregation that would normally occur through disulfide bond formation. An alkylation step following protein reduction was also shown to be necessary to eliminate point streaking observed in silver staining TM that was caused by excess DTT used in the equilibration step for protein resolubilization. Alternative reducing agents such as tributyl phosphine (TBP) have also demonstrated utility for improving the solubilization and transfer of some hydrophobic filamentous proteins (e.g., wool keratins). 19 Furthermore, because TBP does not react with commonly used alkylating reagents (such as iodoacetamide and acrylamide), the equilibration phase can be carried out in a single step where reductant and alkylating agent are combined. Nowadays with common use of fluorescent detection methods, problems associated with silver stain point streaking are mitigated and a rethinking of the advantage for this alkylation step during the equilibration may be appropriate. Nonetheless, additional incubation time in the equilibration solution during the alkylation step helps in the efficient resolubilization of proteins from the IEF gel. Indeed, prolonged equilibration time (up to 45 min) is useful in improving transfer efficiencies of some multiple transmembrane proteins (M. Molloy, unpublished observations). It is important to note, however, that with extended equilibration times there is increased risk of proteins diffusing from their pI values.

B. Nonconventional Equilibration In 2001, papers were published that highlighted possible advantages of alkylating the protein sample prior to IEE 2~ The advantage centers on mitigating the reactivity of cysteine residues to reduce the number of spurious protein isoforms that could be caused by protein disulfide scrambling and reformation. When this approach is taken, the equilibration process is simplified as there is no need to conduct additional reduction and alkylation steps. 2~ These developments have helped to spur the introduction of new alkylating reagents for proteomic research that provide additional utility to allow protein quantification in 2-D gels by the use of stable isotope tagging and MS methods. 24,2s Along a similar tack of blocking cysteines, oxidation of reduced protein thiols with hydroxyethyl disulfide (dithiodiethanol) (marketed as DeStreak TM by Amersham Biosciences) has been reported to decrease streaking during the IEF step, especially in the problematic basic pH range, 26,27 It has been suggested that this reagent could be added to the equilibration solution in place of both the reductant and alkylating reagent to prevent reformation of disulfide cross-links. One important reminder for implementing these alternative techniques is to account correctly for cysteine mass modifications when using MS for protein

128 TABLE I

M.P. MOLLOYAND M.T.McDOWELL Masses of Cysteine Residues Following Alkylation by Reagents Commonly Used in 2-DE

Alkylating reagent

Name of modified cysteine residue

Monoisotopic mass (Da)

Average mass (Da)

None Iodoacetic acid Iodoacetamide 4-Vinyl pyridine Acrylamide Hydroxyethyl disulfide

Cysteine (Cys) Carboxymethyl cysteine (Cys_CM) Carboxyamidomethyl cysteine (Cys_CAM) Pyridylethyl cysteine (Cys_PE) Propionamide cysteine (Cys_PAM) Mercaptoethanol cysteine

103.00919 161.01466 160.03065 208.06704 174.04631 179.00749

103.1448 161.1755 160.1908 208.2840 174.2176 179.2640

The mass modification of cysteine must be taken into account when using MS for protein identification.

identification. Changes in the molecular mass of cysteine residues following modification with reagents that are typically used in 2-DE are shown in Table 1.

C. Transfer of Proteins Between Gel Dimensions Equilibrated first dimension gels can be stored frozen for later use, or interfaced directly with the second dimension slab SDS-PAGE gel for electrophoretic transfer. It is common practice to immobilize the two interfaced gels using a molten agarose solution in gel electrode buffer. This provides for continuous contact between gels and promotes efficient protein transfer. In comparing tube gels and IPGs, Rabilloud and colleagues observed decreased numbers of protein spots on subsequent 2-D gels when IPGs were used in place of tube gels for IEE 28 They proposed that the hydrophobic nature of the basic acrylamido buffers that form the IPG were most likely responsible for the poor transfer of proteins from the IPG to the SDS-PAGE gel. This observation led to the introduction of thiourea to IEF solutions to aid protein solubility when IPGs were used. As a result of incorporating thiourea the number of proteins observed in the second dimension gel increased. 29 The use of thiourea for aiding protein solubilization during IEF is now a routine practice, and is commonly included in the sample solubilization solution and IEF rehydration solution at a concentration of 2 M.

III. SDS-PAGE A. Preparation of Gel Solutions Polyacrylamide gel is universally endorsed as the most useful matrix for protein separations. It is formed by a free-radical-induced polymerization

6

129

TWO-DIMENSIONALGEL ELECTROPHORESIS

reaction between monomeric acrylamide and a cross-linking comonomer, commonly N, N'-methylenebisacrylamide (bis-acrylamide). A catalyst and initiating reagent are added to acrylamide solutions to begin the chain reaction. The polymerization reaction is enhanced by using N, N, N', N'-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) to induce the decomposition of ammonium persulfate, which forms sulfate radicals, hence catalyzing acrylamide polymerization. 3~ As oxygen is a scavenger of free radicals, care should be taken to remove or limit the level of dissolved oxygen present in the gel solutions prior to casting. Futhermore, as free oxygen can delay polymerization, it is a best practice to cast gels the day before and allow them to polymerize overnight prior to use. After polymerization has begun, gels can be stored in gel buffer at 4~ for a few days. Polyacrylamide gels are characterized by their composition of monomer (%T) and cross-linker (~/oC). 31,32 These are defined mathematically as % T = (a + b ) / V x 100,

(1)

% C = b/(a + b ) x 100,

(2)

where a is the mass of acrylamide monomer (g), b the mass of crosslinker monomer (g), and V the volume (mL). In simple terms, % T refers to the total percentage of gel forming monomer, and %C is the proportion of cross-linker monomer as a percentage of total monomer. Polyacrylamide gel pore sizes are inversely proportional to % T. For protein separations, stock solutions of either 40% T or 30% T are commonly used with typical %C ranging from 2.5 to 3.3%. Examples of casting recipes are shown in Table 2. All acrylamide stock solutions should be stored in the dark at 4~ Gel monomer concentration will be dictated by experimental needs and can be optimized to achieve the best resolution for the molecular mass range of interest. TABLE 2

Recipe for Casting SDS-PAGE Gels (100 mL) Final %T

Reagents (mL)

10%

12.5%

15%

Acrylamide: Bis stock (30.8%T:2.6%C) 4X buffer (1.5 M Tris-HC1, pH 8.8) 18.2 M~2 Water 10% (w/v) SDS 10% (w/v) APS (freshly prepared) 10% (v/v) TEMED

33.3 25.0 40.0 1.0 0.5 0.171

41.7 25.0 31.7 1.0 0.5 0.138

50.0 25.0 23.4 1.0 0.5 0.114

130

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

B. Homogeneous Single Percentage Gels Versus Porosity Gradient Gels In homogeneous single percentage (%T) gels there is an approximately linear relationship between the logarithm of protein molecular weight and relative migration distance for proteins in the 15-70 kDa mass range. 33 Porosity gradient gels (gradients of %T) expand the separation range over a broader mass range than single-percentage gels. A further advantage of pore gradient gels is enhanced resolution due to the spot sharpening effect as proteins migrate into pores of decreasing size. 34 While pore gradient gels can be cast with a rudimentary setup consisting of a mixing chamber and two gel reservoirs, high precision is required to maintain reproducibility when casting gradient gels. For this reason and for simplicity, most laboratories that cast their own 2-D gels favor linear % T gels. As a starting point for investigating new samples, a 10% T gel is useful as proteins with masses in the range 150-15 kDa are resolved. Similarly, a porosity gradient gel of 8-16% T is a useful starting point, with the added benefit of the spot sharpening effect. Homogeneous gels with less than 7% T should be avoided for most applications as they can be very fragile as a result of swelling in staining solutions making handling difficult.

C. Cross-linking Monomers Bis-acrylamide is the most common cross-linking reagent for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, although many others have been reported. 35 For example, Hochstrasser et al. described the use of piperazine diacrylamide (PDA) to withstand alkaline hydrolysis during the harsh conditions of diamine silver staining, resulting in clearer gels with less background staining. 36 PDA provides the added advantage of increasing tensile gel strength compared with bis-acrylamide cross-linked 2-D gels. This offers an important advantage to minimize gel breakage when handling large, SDS-PAGE gels (e.g., 26 • 22 cm) commonly favored for proteomic studies. Recently, a proprietary product Rhinohide TM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was described as an additive to bisacrylamide cross-linked gels that helps to improve gel strength. 37 Unlike a competing product, Duracyl TM38(Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI), Rhinohide TM does not distort protein spot shape and has greater opticial clarity. Nonetheless, Duracyl TM provides superior mechanical strength to all competing products.

D. Tris/Glycine/Chloride Buffer System Protein separation by a discontinuous buffer system was first introduced by Ornstein 39 and Davis 4~ and further refined by Laemmli. 11 The

6

TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

13 I

Laemmli system is a modification of the Ornstein and Davis system and separates proteins in a denaturing environment using SDS. It is the most common protein electrophoresis system and the one favored for 2-DE. Traditionally, these systems employ a stacking gel of large pore size (4%T) and low pH (pH 6.8) on top of a high pH (pH 8.8) small-pore size resolving gel (5-20%T). For 2-DE the stacking layer is omitted. It is generally regarded as unnecessary as isoelectric focusing has already prefractionated the proteins and the low percentage IEF gel acts like a stacking gel. The resolving gel is a polyacrylamide slab cast in 375 mM Tris-HC1 (pH 8.8). The addition of 1% (w/v) SDS to the gel can be viewed as optional, but in general, we find the results consistently better when it is included. The standard electrode buffer is 25 mM Tris-base, 192 mM glycine, and 0.1% SDS. The inclusion of SDS at 0.1% or higher in the electrode buffer is vital so that the proteins remain coated with SDS during the entire electrophoresis run. The pH of this buffer is roughly 8.3, and it should never be adjusted by titrating with acid or base as this would add additional buffer ions. Refer to Table 2 for an example recipe for using this system. In the terminology of electrophoresis, chloride ion in the gel buffer is the "leading" buffer ion and the "trailing" ion is glycinate from the electrode buffer. The Tris ion acts as the counter-ion to keep the system electrically balanced. As voltage is applied the ionic components of the sample begin to migrate. The chloride ion, SDS-protein complexes and glycinate form a stack, migrating toward the anode, and the Tris ions migrate toward the cathode. In the stacking region (the IPG or tube gel in 2D-PAGE), the chloride ions move most rapidly followed by the SDS-protein complexes and the trailing glycinate ions. As the buffer ions and proteins leave the stacking region of the gel and enter the increased pH environment of the resolving gel the pore size decreases causing increased protein retardation. The glycinate ions pass the slowed proteins allowing them to unstack and separate according to their sizes. For a detailed review see Reference 31.

E. Alternate Buffer Systems Alternatives to the Laemmli system are numerous. Indeed, Jovin proposed hundreds of theoretical buffer combinations for zone electrophoresis. 41 Commercial suppliers have developed several different buffer systems mainly to extend the shelf life of the gels. Most of these systems mimic the Laemmli system in terms of separation ranges, but employ buffers of neutral pH, including bis-Tris and Tris-acetate that are less likely to cause alkaline hydrolysis of acrylamide upon extended storage. One of the chief limitations of the Laemmli system is its separation range, nonetheless it works extremely well for most proteins. Under

132

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

standard 1-D conditions, the system has a separation range of approximately 14-250 kDa. A generally accepted range for 2-D separations is 14-150 kDa. When proteins of lower molecular mass need to be separated it is advantageous to use an alternate gel buffer system. For example, Sch/igger and von Jagow developed a buffer system using Tris-tricine for separation of 1-100 kDa proteins. 42 However, this system is hampered by extremely long running times. An alternative to the Tris-tricine system, one with taurine as the trailing ion, was recently published. 43 This system has an optimal separation range of 3-200 kDa and is not hampered by long running time.

F. Electrical Considerations in Controlling SDS-PAGE There are three ways to run electrophoresis--constant voltage, constant current, or constant power. The relationship between these parameters according to Ohm's law is shown in the following equations: V=IR,

(3)

where V is the voltage (in V), I the current (in A) and R the resistance (in ~). The concept of power, P (in W) is defined as P = VI.

(4)

Equations (3) and (4) can be rearranged to show the relationship between power and resistance as P = Ve/R or I2R.

(5)

In performing electrophoresis it is important to understand that power is proportional to the energy converted into heat. Therefore, our preference for running multiple large format gels is to control heating output by running at constant power. During the course of a constant power run, the amount of heating remains constant and the voltage and current fluctuate to keep their product constant. The voltage increases and the current decreases during the run as chloride ions in the gel are replaced by lower-mobility glycinate ions. It is important to control power to prevent unwanted heating that would shorten the gel run time and distort gel resolution. Without proper attention this can easily occur when multiple gels are run in the same apparatus. With a constant voltage run, the force (or voltage) remains constant, but as the resistance of the gel increases the current decreases resulting in a slower run. With a constant current run, as resistance increases, voltage increases. Constant current runs allow for fast separation, but produce more heat than constant voltage runs.

6

TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

133

IV. PROTEIN DETECTION The final phase of 2-DE consists of protein visualization. There are two broad categories for total protein detectionmlabeling and staining. The questions posed by each particular study and the amounts of protein loaded onto the gel are the two main factors in choosing a detection method. For a thorough review of detection methods including those not discussed below the reader is referred to a more in-depth discussion in Chapter 8 and elsewhere. 44

A. Labeling Methods With labeling methods, the method of visualization is incorporated into the sample before separation. There are two general methods: metabolic labeling and dye labeling. The key difference between the two is that metabolic labeling is used to examine active synthesis of new proteins, whereas dye labeling visualizes the steady-state levels of protein.

I. Metabolic Labeling Methods Metabolic labeling can also be termed radiolabeling as it classically employs radioactive amino acids such as [3sS]-methionine. 4s,46 The cells or tissues used in a metabolic labeling experiment must still be metabolically active (e.g., cultured cells or tissue sections such as skin). They are incubated with a radioactive amino acid that becomes incorporated into proteins being actively synthesized. The sample is then separated on a 2-D gel and visualized using X-ray film or by phosphorimaging. Metabolic labeling can be used to visualize changes in synthesis rates of proteins. This view requires a much shorter experimental time scale than imaging the steady-state levels of protein. Radiolabeling experiments in our laboratory are often done after compound treatments for 1 h, 47 whereas steady-state measurements are usually only effective at time frames of 8 h or more. One significant drawback to the broader application of metabolic labeling involves difficulty in applying it to animal models. However, in bacterial systems and simple eukaryotes, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae that grow in defined media, it is an ideal methodology for measuring rapid changes in the proteome. 2. Preseparation Labeling Differential in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE) is a patented technology distributed by Amersham Biosciences. The DIGE system involves the labeling of protein samples prior to separation using charge and mass-matched cyanine dyes, Cy2, Cy3, and Cy5. 48-sl This is illustrated in Figure 2. Each of the dyes exhibits unique flurochrome properties allowing measurement of individual dyes within a mixed sample. The general design for DIGE experiments is to label a control sample with either Cy3 or Cy5 and the

134

M.P. MOLLOYAND M.T. McDOWEL.L

F I G U R E 2 Illustration of the DIGE technique.Treated samples are labeled with Cy3 dye, control samples labeled with Cy5 dye, and a pooled control/treated sample labeled with Cy2 dye. Samples are mixed together and then separated using the same 2-D gel.Visualization of the proteins corresponding to either the treated or control sample is achieved by variable-wavelength imaging. Image overlays are used to determine protein expression differences between control and treated samples.

6

TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

135

experimental sample with the other dye. A pooled sample of both the experimental and control sample is also made and this is labeled with Cy2. The three samples, Cy5--1abeled experimental, Cy3~labeled control, and Cy2~labeled standard, are combined then separated using standard 2-DE protocols. After separation, the gel is imaged using a variable-wavelength scanner. Each dye is visualized separately, and then the images are overlaid. Because the three samples have all been separated in the same gel, comparisons between control and the experimental sample are straightforward as gel-to-gel variations are mitigated. Eliminating or decreasing gel-to-gel variation is important as most of the analysis time spent with 2-D gels comes from matching protein spots across different gels. There are two strategies available with DIGE: minimal labeling and saturation labeling. The minimal labeling technique employs NHS esters that react with the primary amino groups of proteins; N-hydroxy succinimyl (NHS) the e-amino groups of lysine, and unblocked amino termini. The key with minimal labeling is to control it such that proteins are only labeled once with a single dye molecule. This is achieved by limiting the concentrations of the dye molecules available for addition. As a consequence of this, only a small percentage of protein molecules of any one species are labeled. Since the labeled proteins are modified with a dye molecule they will be slightly offset from the main peak of protein in the gel. This small percentage of labeled protein is insufficient for mass spectrometry (MS) identification so the gel must still be stained with a general stain such as SYPRO | Ruby to visualize the full protein spot and allow spot picking. The saturation labeling technique employs maleimide-reactive dyes. s2 Maleimides react preferentially with thiol groups of cysteine residues. The reaction is carried out at high dye concentrations so that all cysteines are labeled. A key caveat to this technique is that proteins that do not contain cysteine residues will not be labeled and hence not visualized. The major benefit of the DIGE technology, as mentioned above, is the significant reduction in gel-to-gel variation. As the control and the treated sample are mixed and run in the same gel, the variability associated with running and matching two gels is eliminated. DIGE does not overcome the gel-to-gel variation for comparison of replicates and does not overcome the challenge of gel matching when more complex experiments requiring several different comparisons are carried out (e.g., multiple time points or compounds and doses). As image analysis is the major bottleneck in 2-D gel analysis, even a modest decrease in gel-to-gel variation is very beneficial. There are two major downsides to DIGE. The first is the large expense to purchase the dyes that restricts wider popularity. The second downside is the inherent nature of the labeling technology. As this is a protein chemistry technique the use of the dyes often requires optimization and cannot be exhaustively "cook-booked" as is favored for many kits and technologies today.

136

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

B. Staining Methods I. Visible Stains

The two most common visible staining methods are Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining and silver staining. There are two slightly different CBB dyes, G250 and R250. G250 is more hydrophobic than R250 due to additional methyl groups allowing it to be used as a colloidal stain. Both dyes can be used to stain proteins and this occurs mechanistically through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, s3 The most sensitive staining method for CBB is as a colloidal solution using G250. The benefit of this approach is that the colloidal suspension yields clearer 2-D gel backgrounds because less free dye is available to stain the gel matrix. The linear dynamic range of colloidal CBB staining is very limited, of the order of 10-30 fold, with detection sensitivity in the low ng range. 44,s4-s6 Proteins detected with CBB are readily amenable to MS analysis. Protein detection by silver staining is a classically sensitive protein detection method. There are two general types of silver staining used with 2-D gels for proteomics, silver diamine and silver nitrate. Beyond this there is an almost infinite number of variations for silver staining. There are several excellent reviews of the subject of silver staining that lay out many of the key methodology differences, s7,s8 While silver stain is noted as the most sensitive of the visible stains, some of the chief issues with it are its labor-intensive protocols, gel-to-gel staining variability, a lack of any real linear dynamic range for quantitative analysis of protein levels, and historic difficulties with MS identification of proteins. 2. Fluorescent Stains

Fluorescent detection of proteins provides many distinct advantages over silver staining and visible organic staining. As mentioned above, the visible methods of protein detection suffer from very limited linear dynamic ranges so that accurate quantification of protein levels is extremely limited. In contrast, the fluorescent staining methods offer a much g:eater linear dynamic range of up to three orders of magnitude. Fluorescent stains and fluorescent labels can be imaged using either CCD cameras, or for highest sensitivity, variable-wavelength laser scanners. The better fluorescent stains offer the sensitivity equal to silver stain (low ng range). Furthermore, by taking advantage of the unique excitation and emission maxima of different fluorescent dyes, this approach offers the real potential for multiplex analysis of samples, s9 Postseparation Detection: The first fluorescent dye introduced as a general protein stains was Nile Red. 6~ Although it has been used for protein staining it has largely been supplanted by less cumbersome dyes such as SYPRO | Red and SYPRO | Orange. 44 In contrast to visible

6

TVVO-DIMENSlONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

137

organic stains that bind directly to amino acids, these fluorescent dyes interact with the SDS micelles coating the proteins. Protocols for using SYPRO | Red and SYPRO | Orange have been developed for staining 2-D gels, but sensitivity is slightly diminished on 2-D gels relative to 1-D gels. 62,63 The limit of sensitivity for Sypro Red and Sypro Orange is approximately 5-10 n g . 34 Subsequently, there was a breakthrough for general fluorescent protein staining with the introduction of SYPRO | Ruby. 64,65 SYPRO | Ruby is a ruthenium chelate dye that interacts with proteins by non-covalent, electrostatic, and hydrophobic binding. The protocol for staining gels with SYPRO | Ruby is as simple as staining with CBB. The gels are fixed briefly with ethanol or methanol and acetic acid, then immersed in the dye solution overnight. After staining, the gels are rinsed for about 2 h with several changes of the fixing solution, and then imaged using a CCD camera, or for higher sensitivity, a variable-wavelength laser scanner. The linear dynamic range of SYPRO | Ruby can be as high as three orders of magnitude, from 1-2 pg to 1-2 ng of protein. Two other points about SYPRO | Ruby are that it does not stain non-protein interfering substances and that gels cannot be overstained. This is in contrast to silver staining that suffers from both of these problems. We find the use of SYPRO Ruby staining very convenient because of its simplicity and sensitivity. However, to gain maximum sensitivity the stain should be used only once and the gels imaged using a laser scanner. In this regard users should note that both the required instrumentation and staining reagent itself are expensive compared with performing classical detection methods. More selective fluorescent protein stains have also been developed including Pro-Q TM Diamond for phosphorylated proteins 66 and Pro-Q TM Emerald for glycoproteins. 67 These stains can both be multiplexed with SYPRO | Ruby to overlay subsets of proteins with the total protein content of the sample. V. GEL REPRODUCIBILITY 2-DE is well regarded as a mature, robust technology. One measure of the success of the approach can be gathered empirically based on the large number of reports citing its use (>10 000 hits returned on a search of Medline for "two-dimensional gel electrophoresis" between 1975 and 2003). One of the factors contributing to the successful use of 2-DE comes from the improvements in reproducibility afforded by the introduction of IPGs for IEE Inter-laboratory comparisons have shown that spot position reproducibility is extremely good (__ 1 mm for 18 cm IPGs) and that on average the reproducibility of quantitative measurements is

138

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

of the order of 20-30% coefficient of variation (CV). 68-73 For selective spots that resolve well, typical CVs are below 15 %.69 An appreciation of the degree of quantitative variation due to the technical process is important for studies attempting to measure changes in protein expression. Clearly, when the goal is to measure small differences in protein levels between samples, either the degree of variation within the sample population must be small, or the number of individual samples measured must be large to gain significantly confident results. 74,75 For most quantitative studies using 2-D gels a twofold change in differential expression is commonly used, and for this purpose typical gel-to-gel variations do not affect the reliability of this measurement. Vl. PRACTICALAPPLICATIONS

Proteomic analyses usually fall into two classes: (i) cataloging of the polypeptides present in a sample, (ii) quantitative measures of protein abundance or synthesis. 2-DE is ideally suited for both of these applications. Cataloging experiments using 2-D gels and MS are aimed at increasing our knowledge of the protein "players" involved in a given biological state. As an example, cataloging of proteins present in serum or plasma is viewed as an important activity that may help in identifying protein biomarkers associated with disease. 76-78 Other cataloging studies involve characterizing the protein component of simple organelles to facilitate greater understanding of their function. 79,8~Along these lines, numerous groups have reported the outcomes of cataloging experiments of model systems used in research. In these cases, the protein components are considered dynamic and represent our state of knowledge given the limitations of our analytical techniques. Summaries of proteomic cataloging experiments can be found on numerous websites. A comprehensive example is the SWISS-2DPAGE database. 81 Although 2-DE has high peak capacity for protein separation, recent evidence using MS indicates that some protein spots on 2-D gels actually contain multiple protein species. 82 This is not surprising given the large number of gene products expected in any organism, the dynamic nature of protein turnover (many protein fragments), and the high degree of post-translational protein modification. By exploiting the resolving power of IEF, narrow pH range IPGs have been developed and it is anticipated that this may reduce the number of overlapping proteins detected in a single spot. 83 An example of IEF using broad and narrow pH ranges is shown in Figure 3. Quantitative measures of protein abundance or synthesis can be made using 2-D gels. This approach is complimentary to the cataloging experiments described above. However, in this case, the focus is on greater understanding of the cellular processes at play through monitoring protein

6

TWO-DIMENSIONALGEL ELECTROPHORESIS

FIGURE 3

139

Comparison of broad and narrow pH range IEF for separation of a

yeast cell lysate. IPGs used for IEF and detection by silver nitrate staining: (a) pH 4-7 IPG, (b) pH 4.5-5.5 IPG.

fluxes in response to stimuli. Experimental design is the key in these experiments and must include an appropriate survey sample size and correct control samples. 2-DE is well suited to cope with the large number of samples typically used for quantitative studies. To date, the utility of non-gelbased methods for coping with large numbers of samples has yet to be demonstrated. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to review these

140

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

applications other than to point out broad categories which include applications in toxicology, drug discovery, disease diagnosis, and fundamental investigations of cell biology and biochemistry. VII. ADVANTAGESAND LIMITATIONS OF 2-DE

Advantages of 2-DE for proteomic studies that are not readily provided by alternative approaches include: (1) maturity of the methodology; (2) affordability; (3) high sample throughput; (4) detection of post-translationally modified proteins including phosphorylated and glycosylated proteins; and (5) the detection of protein fragments. It is important to acknowledge the limitations of 2-DE for proteomics. This is crucial so that experiments may be designed appropriately and to focus attention on areas that require technical development. For 2-DE these limitations include: (1) difficulties with IEF separation of proteins at the extremes of pH values (<3, >10); (2) difficulties with IEF of hydrophobic membrane proteins; 84-86 (3) difficulties with separation of small and large molecular mass proteins (<10 kDa, >200 kDa); and (4) insufficient protein detection sensitivity. A major challenge for all proteomic techniques is to develop analytical approaches to cope with the large dynamic range of protein expression. The linear dynamic range of protein expression in living tissue is in the range of six orders of magnitude, while in serum this range is even greater, approaching nine orders of magnitude. 87 With a dynamic range of 103-10 4, 2-D gels face limitations in their ability to build a complete proteome inventory. Sample prefractionation has been suggested as a means of addressing this issue with some promising results obtained from techniques including differential protein solubility 88 and preparative isoelectric fractionation. 89 VIII. SUMMARY

2-DE continues to set the benchmark as the premier technique for protein separation in proteomic applications. The approach is very well suited for routine separation of moderately abundant proteins within a window of pH 3-10 and M r = 10-200 kDa, allowing for cataloging and quantitative measures of protein expression. The method is mature, reproducible, and affordable.

REFERENCES 1. O'Farrell, P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250:4007-4021, 1975.

6

TWO-DIMENSIONALGEL ELECTROPHORESIS

14 1

2. Klose, J. Protein mapping by combined isoelectric focusing and electrophoresis in mouse tissues. A novel approach to testing for induced point mutations in mammals. Humangenetik 26:231-243, 1975. 3. Scheele, G. Two-dimensional gel analysis of soluble proteins. Characterization of guinea pig exocrine pancreatic proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250:5375-5385, 1975. 4. Wilkins, M. R., Pasquali, C., Appel, R. D., Ou, K., Golaz, O., Sanchez, J.-C., Yan, J. X., Gooley, A. A., Hughes, G., Humphery-Smith, I., Williams, K. L. and Hochstrasser, D. F. From proteins to proteomes: large scale protein identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and amino acid analysis. Biotechnology (N Y) 14:61-65, 1996. 5. Wilkins, M. R., Williams, K. L., Appel, R. D. and Hochstrasser, D. F. Proteome Research: New Frontiers in Functional Genomics, Springer, Berlin, 1997. 6. James, P. Proteome Research: Mass Spectrometry, Springer, Berlin, 2000. 7. Simpson, R. J. Proteins and Proteomics. A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 425-596, 2003. 8. Rabilloud, T. Solubilization of proteins for electrophoretic analyses. Electrophoresis 17:813-829, 1996. 9. Bjellqvist, B., Ek, K., Righetti, P. G., Gianazza, E., Gorg, A., Westermeier, R. and Postel, W. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients: principle, methodology and some applications. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 6:317-339, 1982. 10. Reynolds, J. A. and Tanford, C. Binding of dodecyl sulfate to proteins at high binding ratios. Possible implications for the state of proteins in biological membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 66:1002-1007, 1970. 11. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680-685, 1970. 12. Segrest, J. P. and Jackson, R. L. Molecular weight determination of glycoproteins by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate. Methods Enzymol. 28B:54-63, 1972. 13. Kaufmann, E., Geisler, N. and Weber, K. SDS-PAGE strongly overestimates the molecular masses of the neurofilament proteins. FEBS Lett. 170:81-84, 1984. 14. Molloy, M. P., Bolis, S., Herbert, B. R., Ou, K., Tyler, M. I., van Dyk, D. D., Willcox, M. D., Gooley, A. A., Williams, K. L., Morris, C. A. and Walsh, B. J. Establishment of the human reflex tear two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis reference map: new proteins of potential diagnostic value. Electrophoresis 18:2811-2815, 1997. 15. Herbert, B. R., Molloy, M. P., Yan, J. X., Gooley, A. A., Bryson, W. G. and Williams, K. L. Characterisation of wool intermediate filament proteins separated by micropreparative two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18:568-572, 1997. 16. Gorg, A., Postel, W., Gunther, S. and Weser, J. Improved horizontal two-dimensional electrophoresis with hybrid isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients in the first dimension and laying-on transfer to the second dimension. Electrophoresis 6:599-604, 1985. 17. Gorg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Harder, A., Scheibe, B., Wildgruber, R. and Weiss, W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:1037-1053, 2000. 18. Gorg, A., Postel, W., Weser, J., Gunther, S., Strahler, J. R., Hanash, S. M. and Somerlot, L. Elimination of point streaking on silver stained two-dimensional gels by addition of iodoacetamide to the equilibration buffer. Electrophoresis 8:122-124, 1987. 19. Herbert, B. R., Molloy, M. P., Gooley, A. A., Walsh, B. R., Bryson, W. G. and Williams, K. L. Improved protein solubility in two-dimensional electrophoresis using tributyl phosphine as reducing agent. Electrophoresis 19:845-851, 1998. 20. Herbert, B., Galvani, M., Hamdan, M., Olivieri, E., MacCarthy, J., Pedersen, S. and Righetti, P. G. Reduction and alkylation of proteins in preparation of two-dimensional map analysis: why, when, and how? Electrophoresis 22:2046-2057, 2001.

142.

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

21. Galvani, M., Hamdan, M., Herbert, B. and Righetti, P. G. Alkylation kinetics of proteins in preparation for two-dimensional maps: a matrix assisted laser desorption/ ionization-mass spectrometry investigation. Electropboresis 22:2058-2065, 2001. 22. Galvani, M., Rovatti, L., Hamdan, M., Herbert, B. and Righetti, P. G. Protein alkylation in the presence/absence of thiourea in proteome analysis: a matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry investigation. Electrophoresis 22:2066-2074, 2001. 23. Herbert, B., Hopwood, F., Oxley, D., McCarthy, J., Laver, M., Gringer, L., Goodall, A., Williams, K., Castagna, A. and Righetti, P. R. Beta-elimination: an unexpected artefact in proteome analysis. Proteomics 3:826-831, 2003. 24. Gehanne, S., Cecconi, D., Carboni, L., Righetti, P. R., Domenici, E. and Hamdan, M. Quantitative analysis of two-dimensional gel-separated proteins using isotopically marked alkylating agents and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spec. 16:1692-1698, 2002. 25. Sebastiano, R., Citterio, A., Lapadula, M. and Righetti, P. R. A new deuterated alkylating agent for quantitative proteomics, Rapid Commun. Mass Spec. 17:2380-2386, 2003. 26. Olsson, I., Larsson, K., Palmgren, R. and Bjellqvist, B. Organic disulfides as a means to generate streak-free two-dimensional maps with narrow range basic immobilized pH gradient strips as first dimension. Proteomics 2:1630-1632, 2002. 27. Luche, S., Diemer, H., Tastet, C., Chevallet, M., Van Dorsselaer, A., Leize-Wagner, E. and Rabilloud, T. About thiol derivatization and resolution of basic proteins in twodimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 4:551-561, 2004. 28. Adessi, C., Miege, C., Albrieux, C. and Rabilloud, T. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of membrane proteins: a current challenge for immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 18:127-135, 1997. 29. Rabilloud, T., Adessi, C., Giraudel, A. and Lunardi, J. Improvement of the solubilization of proteins in two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 18:307-316, 1997. 30. Crambach, A. and Rodbard, D. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Science 172:440-451, 1971. 31. Garfin, D. E. In Introduction to Biophysical Methods for Protein and Nucleic Acid Research, (Glasel, J. A. and Deutscher, M. P. Eds.) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 53-109, 1995. 32. Westermeier, R. and Naven, T. Proteomics in Practice, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 57-78, 2002. 33. Righetti, P. G., Stoyanov, A. V. and Zhukov, M. Y. In The Proteome Revisited: Theory and Practice of All Electropboretic Steps, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 217-274, 2001. 34. Margolis, J. and Kenrick, K. G. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in a continuous molecular sieve gradient. Anal. Biochem. 25:347-362, 1968. 35. Righetti, P. G. Of matrices and men. J. Biocbem. Biopbys. Methods 19:1-20, 1989. 36. Hochstrasser, D. F., Patchornik, A. and Merril, C. R. Development of polyacrylamide gels that improve the separation of proteins and their detection by silver staining. Anal. Biochem. 173:412-423, 1988. 37. Schulenberg, B., Arnold, B. and Patton, W. F. An improved mechanically durable electrophoresis gel matrix that is fully compatible with fluorescence-based protein detection technologies. Proteomics 3:1196-1205, 2003. 38. Patton, W. F., Lopez, M. F., Barry, P. and Skea, W. M. A mechanically strong matrix for protein electrophoresis with enhanced silver staining properties. Biotechniques 12:580-585, 1992. 39. Ornstein, L. Disc electrophoresis, 1, background and theory. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 121:321-349, 1964. 40. Davis, B. J. Disc electrophoresis, 2, method and application to human serum proteins. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 121:404-427, 1964.

6

TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

143

41. Jovin, T. M. Multiphasic zone electrophoresis, IV. Design and analysis of discontinuous buffer systems with a digital computer. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209"477-496, 1973. 42. Sch/igger, H. and von Jagow, G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166:368-379, 1987. 43. Tastet, C., Lescuyer, P., Diemer, H., Luche, S., van Dorsselaer, A. and Rabilloud, T. A versatile electrophoresis system for the analysis of high- and low-molecular-weight proteins. Proteomics 24:1787-1794, 2003. 44. Patton, W. Detection technologies in proteome analysis. J. Chromatogr. B 771:3-31, 2002. 45. Coligan, J. E., Gates, F. T. III, Kimball, E. S. and Maloy, W. L. Radiochemical sequence analysis of metabolically labeled proteins. Methods Enzymol. 91:413-434, 1983. 46. Pollard, J. W. Radioisotope labeling of proteins for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In The Protein Protocols Handbook (Walker, J. M., Ed.) Humana Press, Totowa, 1996. 47. VanBogelen, R. A. and Neidhardt, F. C. Preparation of Escherichia coli samples for 2-D gel analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 112:21-29, 1999. 48. Unlu, M., Morgan, M. E. and Minden, J. S. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electropboresis 18:2071-2077, 1997. 49. Tonge, R., Shaw, J., Middleton, B., Rowlinson, R., Rayner, S., Young, J., Pognan, F., Hawkins, E., Currie, I. and Davison, M. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 1.377-396, 2001. 50. Yan, J. X., Devenish, A. T., Wait, R., Stone, T., Lewis, S. and Fowler, S. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli. Proteomics 2:1682-1698, 2002. 51. Alban, A., David, S. O., Bjorkesten, L., Andersson, C., Sloge, E., Lewis, S. and Currie, I. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: twodimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics 3:36-44, 2003. 52. Shaw, J., Rowlinson, R., Nickson, J., Stone, T., Sweet, A., Williams, K. and Tonge, R. Evaluation of saturation labelling two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis fluorescent dyes. Proteomics 3:1181-1195, 2003. 53. Righetti, P. G. In Immobilized pH gradients: theory and methodology (Burdon, R. H. and van Knippenberg, P. H., Eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 171-173, 1990. 54. Neuhoff, V., Arold, N., Taube, D. and Ehrhardt, W. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis 9:255-262, 1988. 55. Neuhoff, V., Stamm, R. and Eibl, H. Clear background and highly sensitive protein staining with Coomassie Blue dyes in polyacrylamide gels: a systematic analysis. Electrophoresis 6:427-448, 1985. 56. Syrovy, I. and Hodny, Z. Staining and quantification of proteins separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. 569:175-196, 1991. 57. Rabilloud, T. Mechanisms of protein silver staining in polyacrylamide gels: a 10-year synthesis. Electrophoresis 11:785-794, 1990. 58. Rabilloud, T., Vuillard, L., Gilly, C. and Lawrence, J.-J. Silver-staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels: a general overview. Cell. Mol. Biol. 40:57-75, 1994. 59. Patton, W. F. and Beechem, J. M. Rainbow's end: the quest for multiplexed fluorescence quantitative analysis in proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6:63-69, 2002. 60. Daban, J. R., Samso, M. and Bartolome, S. Use of nile red as a fluorescent probe for the study of the hydrophobic properties of protein-sodium dodecyl sulfate complexes in solution. Anal. Biochem. 199:162-168, 1991.

144

M.P. MOLLOY AND M.T. McDOWELL

61. Daban, J. R., Bartolome, S. and Samso, M. Use of the hydrophobic probe Nile red for the fluorescent staining of protein bands in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 199:169-174, 1991. 62. Malone, J., Radabaugh, M. R., Leimgruber, R. M. and Gerstenecker, G. S. Practical aspects of fluorescent staining for proteomic applications. Electrophoresis 22:919-932, 2001. 63. Lauber, W. M., Carroll, J. A., Dufield, D. R., Kiesel, J. R., Radabaugh, M. R. and Malone, J. P. Mass spectrometry compatibility of two-dimensional gel protein stains. EIectrophoresis 22:906-918, 2001. 64. Berggren, K., Chernokalskaya, E., Steinberg, T. H., Kemper, C., Lopez, M. F., Diwu, Z., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Background-free, high sensitivity staining of proteins in one- and two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels using a luminescent ruthenium complex. Electrophoresis 21:2509-2521, 2000. 65. Berggren, K. N., Schulenberg, B., Lopez, M. F., Steinberg, T. H., Bogdanova, A., Smejkal, G., Wang, A. and Patton, W. F. An improved formulation of SYPRO Ruby protein gel stain: comparison with the original formulation and with a ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) formulation. Proteomics 2:486-498, 2002. 66. Steinberg, T. H., Agnew, B. J., Gee, K. R., Leung, W. Y., Goodman, T., Schulenberg, B., Hendrickson, J., Beechem, J. M., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Global quantitative phosphoprotein analysis using Multiplexed Proteomics technology. Proteomics 3:1128-1144, 2003. 67. Steinberg, T. H., Pretty On Top, K., Berggren, K. N., Kemper, C., Jones, L., Diwu, Z., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Rapid and simple single nanogram detection of glycoproteins in polyacrylamide gels and on electroblots. Proteomics 1:841-855, 2001. 68. Anderson, N. L., Nance, S. L., Tollaksen, S. L., Giere, F. A. and Anderson, N. G. Quantitative reproducibility of measurements from Coomassie Blue-stained twodimensional gels: analysis of mouse liver protein patterns and a comparison of BALB/c and C57 strains. Electrophoresis 6:592-599, 1985. 69. Giometti, C. S., Gemmell, M. A., Nance, S. L., Tollaksen, S. L. and Taylor, J. Detection of heritable mutations as quantitative changes in protein expression. J. Biol. Chem. 262:12764-12767, 1987. 70. Giometti, C. S., Gemmell, A. M., Tollaksen, S. L. and Taylor, J. Quantitation of human leukocyte proteins after silver staining: a study with two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 12:536-543, 1991. 71. Blomberg, A., Blomberg, L., Norbeck, J., Fey, S. J., Larsen, P. M., Larsen, M., Roepstorff, P., Degand, H., Boutry, M., Posch, A. and Gorg, A. Interlaboratory reproducibility of yeast protein patterns analyzed by immobilized pH gradient two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 16:1935-1945, 1995. 72. Lopez, M. F. and Patton, W. F. Reproducibility of polypeptide spot positions in twodimensional gels run using carrier ampholytes in the isoelectric focusing dimension. Electrophoresis 18:338-343, 1997. 73. Molloy, M. P., Brzezinski, E. E., Hang, J., McDowell, M. T. and VanBogelen, R. A. Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 3:1912-1919, 2003. 74. Motulsky, H. Intuitive Biostatistics, Oxford University Press, NY, pp. 195-204, 1995. 75. Lachin, J. Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Contro. Clin. Trials 2:93-113, 1981. 76. Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C. and Liotta, L. A. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet, 359:572-577, 2002. 77. Liotta, L. A., Ferrari, M. and Petricoin, E. Clinical proteomics: written in blood. Nature 425:905, 2003. 78. Pieper, R., Gatlin, C. L., Makusky, A. J., Russo, P. S., Schatz, C. R., Miller, S. S., Su, Q., McGrath, A. M., Estock, M. A., Parmar, P. P., Zhao, M., Huang, S. T., Zhou, J.,

6

TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS

79. 80. 81. 82.

83.

84.

85. 86. 87. 88.

89.

145

Wang, F., Esquer-Blasco, R., Anderson, N. L., Taylor, J. and Steiner, S. The human serum proteome: display of nearly 3700 chromatographically separated protein spots on two-dimensional electrophoresis gels and identification of 325 distinct proteins. Proteomics 3:1345-1364, 2003. Taylor, S. W., Fahy, E. and Ghosh, S. S. Global organellar proteomics. Trends Biotechnol. 21:82-88, 2003. Jung, E., Heller, M., Sanchez, J.-C. and Hochstrasser, D. F. Proteomics meets cell biology: the establishment of subcellular proteomes. Electrophoresis 21:3369-3377, 2000. http://us.expasy.org/ch2d/2d-index.html. Gygi, S. P., Corthals, G. L., Zhang, Y., Rochon, Y. and Aebersold, R. Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9390-9395, 2000. Westbrook, J. A., Yan, J. X., Wait, R., Welson, S. Y. and Dunn, M. J. Zooming-in on the proteome: very narrow-range immobilised pH gradients reveal more protein species and isoforms. Electrophoresis 22:2865-2871, 2001. Wilkins, M. R., Gasteiger, E., Sanchez, J.-C., Bairoch, A. and Hochstrasser, D. F. Twodimensional gel electrophoresis for proteome projects: the effects of protein hydrophobicity and copy number. Electrophoresis 19:1501-1505, 1998. Molloy, M. P. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of membrane proteins using immobilized pH gradients. Anal. Biochem. 280:1-10, 2000. Santoni, V., Molloy, M. and Rabilloud, T. Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible? Electrophoresis 21:1054-1070, 2000. Anderson, N. L. and Anderson, N. G. The Human Plasma Proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1:845-867, 2002. Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Walsh, B. J., Tyler, M. I., Sanchez, J.-C., Hochstrasser, D. F., Williams, K. L. and Gooley, A. A. Extraction of membrane proteins for two-dimensional electrophoresis by differential solubility. Electrophoresis 19:837-844, 1998. Pedersen, S. K., Harry, J. L., Sebastian, L., Baker, J., Traini, M. D., McCarthy, J. T., Manoharan, A., Wilkins, M. R., Gooley, A. A., Righetti, P. G., Packer, N. H., Williams, K. L. and Herbert, B. R. Unseen proteome: mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2:303-311, 2003.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

7

SOME PRACTICESAND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING IN PROTEOMICS BEN HERBERT

Proteome Systems Ltd., 1135-41 Waterloo Road, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2113, Australia

I. II. III. IV. V. VI.

INTRODUCTION REDUCTION AND ALKYLATION BETA ELIMINATION OF CYSTEINE CARBAMYLATION STABLE ISOTOPE LABELING-BASED QUANTITATION SAMPLE HOMOGENIZATION AND NUCLEIC ACID REMOVAL A. Mechanical Methods B. Enzymatic Methods of Nucleic Acid Removal C. Centrifugal Methods D. Precipitation from Organic Solvents VII. MEMBRANE PROTEINS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Classical isoelectric focusing (IEF) was mainly concerned with separations of soluble proteins, and at that time it was satisfactory to load proteins dissolved in water or dilute solutions of carrier ampholytes on to the IEF columns or gels. Sufficient solubilization of insoluble proteins was in many cases achieved by dissolving proteins in solutions containing detergents and (or) chaotropes. 1 Initially, IEF was used to study intact proteins, but two related considerations led to the adaptation of completely denatured proteins for IEF separations. The first of these considerations was a need to reduce the ambiguities in separation patterns 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

147

148

B. HERBERT

brought about by the realization that conformational isomers of the same protein can attain different pI values. The second, and perhaps more fundamental, consideration derives from the need to relate protein sequence information to genomic data. Thus, reducing agents were incorporated in sample preparation techniques in order to reduce the disulfide bridges of cystine residues to cysteine sulfhydryls. The advent of the proteomic approach to protein biochemistry with its strong reliance on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry, brought with it a re-examination of sample preparation methods for IEE 2-DE places exacting demands on sample preparation for IEF because it is exquisitely sensitive to artifacts that can change the charges on proteins. In addition, mass spectrometry can detect very small differences in polypeptide masses. It is therefore incumbent on sample preparation methods that they do not introduce artifacts in order that charge and mass differences among polypeptides can be attributed to post-translational modifications and not to sample handling. Sample preparation for IEF can be considered as a subset of sample preparation for 2-DE. The vast majority of improvements in sample preparation for IEF has arisen as methods designed for 2-DE. Consequently, the discussion in this chapter is centered on methods that were devised for and tested by 2-DE. In particular, the physical methods that have been developed for pre-fractionating complex protein samples prior to 2-DE are not discussed, rather some findings are presented regarding the advantages and disadvantages of various detergents, chaotropes, and reducing agents that are used to treat protein samples immediately prior to IEE The greatest challenge in proteomics is to identify reagents, or combinations of reagents, that will solubilize the broadest range of proteins and maintain their solubility during the entire 2-DE procedure. Standard methods for IEF rely on non-ionic or zwitterionic reagents to disrupt protein complexes and denature proteins to their constituent polypeptide monomers. A common sample preparation solution for 2-DE consists of 8 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 50 mM DTT, 0.2% carrier ampholytes, and 0.001% Bromophenol Blue. (CHAPS is a zwitterionic detergent, 2 DTT is dithiothreitol, a sulfhydryl reducing agent (percentages are w/v), and Bromophenol Blue is for tracking the electrophoresis.) With many types of samples, spot quantity and quality in 2-DE is improved by replacing Bromophenol Blue with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-2503 (0.001% made from a 1% stock in 10% isopropyl alcohol), especially at the basic end of the pH gradient. Because IEF separates proteins based on isoelectric point, the single most powerful solubilizing reagent, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), is not normally usable unless it can be displaced by an used IEFcompatible detergent prior to the focusing run. If SDS is used to extract proteins from cells, tissues, or fluids, it must be diluted at least 8-10-fold in an IEF solution containing, for example CHAPS, or it can cause anomalous

7

SOMEPRACTICESAND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

149

focusing and horizontal streaking. To approximate the denaturing power of boiling SDS under reducing conditions, IEF practitioners have relied on various cocktails of chaotropes, surfactants, and reducing agents. Chaotropes, urea being the most common for IEF, disrupt the hydrogen bonding between water and a protein's surface to cause partial unfolding which exposes the (hydrophobic) interior of the protein. This partial unfolding often compromises the protein's solubility in aqueous solution, thus the requirement for detergents, which are often called surfactants. It is normal to have at least one surfactant present in the IEF cocktail to help in solubilizing the hydrophobic domains that are exposed as a result of denaturation. Even small amounts (20 mM) of ionic substances prolong the electrophoresis and are not generally compatible with steady-state IEE Thus, the use of strong ionic detergents such as SDS is not recommended and IEF is restricted in use to non-ionic or zwitterionic detergents. Traditionally, non-ionic surfactants such as Triton X-100 and octyl glucoside have been used, however, more recently, these have been superseded by the sulfobetaine class of surfactants such as CHAPS, an amid o- sulfo betaine. 1,2 Finally, the standard IEF sample cocktail includes reducing agents which break disulfide bonds to enable complete protein unfolding and denaturation. The two main types of reducing agents used are the freethiol reagents such as mercaptoethanol and dithiothreitol and the phosphines, a group of trivalent phosphorous compounds. The traditional free-thiol compounds are used at high concentrations (20-100 mM) and work by displacing the equilibrium toward the breakage of disulfides. However, the reagents are charged at alkaline pH and reducing conditions are almost impossible to maintain during IEE 4 The non-charged phosphines, such as tributyl phosphine (TBP), provide improved reducing conditions and thus improved focusing for some samples. 4 However, even the phosphines fail to provide reducing conditions for the overnight run times required for equilibrium focusing in immobilized pH gradients (IPGs). It is becoming apparent that the ultimate sample preparation method for disulfides is to alkylate the reduced cysteines prior to IEF, which has the added advantage of avoiding reducing conditions during and after the IEF run. The chemistry of cysteine has a number of pitfalls which will be discussed in detail in this chapter. Since 1996 a number of publications have reported and reviewed the use of novel reagents such as thiourea and new sulfobetaine surfactants, which improve protein solubilization prior to IEE 1,4-7 Thiourea at 2 M, in combination with urea at 7 M, produces a far more chaotropic sample solution than the conventional 8 M urea. However, this increased chaotropic power required a new class of surfactants to cope with the highly denaturing environment. Rabilloud developed several new surfactants, the best of which are named amido-sulfobetaine 14 (ASB-14) and

150

B. HERBERT

C7bZ0. 5'6 In combination with urea and thiourea, either of these detergents provides a formidable level of solubilizing power. The increased solubility obtainable with these new reagents coupled with the high resolution of separation on narrow-range IPGs has significantly increased the total number of resolvable proteins in 2-DE analysis. However, the increased number of proteins solubilized from a single sample causes difficulties in attempts to separate them on a single 2-D gel and complexity reduction via prefractionation is essential. As proteomics matures there is a renewed awareness of co- and posttranslational modifications, as these are clearly the mechanisms that generate protein complexity given the relatively small number of genes in the human genome. Thus, in separation sciences the pressure is on to ensure that artifactual protein modifications are eliminated or at least minimized.

II. REDUCTION AND ALKYLATION

In 2-DE, the standard procedure adopted up to the present calls for reduction prior to the IEF/IPG step, followed by a second reduction/alkylation step in the equilibration solution between the first and second dimension, in preparation for the SDS-PAGE step. This protocol is far from being optimal, due to incomplete reduction during the IEF and often results in a large number of spurious multimeric spots, due to "scrambled" disulfide bridges between like and unlike chains. Due to the negative charge on the -SH group of typical reducing agents such as DTT, this compound can act as a buffer and it will migrate inside the pH gradient (toward the anode) until it is arrested, by protonation, at around pH 7. Thus, artifacts arising from incomplete reduction are more often observed in the alkaline portion of the IPG. Even tributyl phosphine, a strong non-thiol reducing agent, does not appear to have the reducing power to maintain all proteins as monomeric polypeptides during the lEE This might possibly be because TBP is so volatile that it evaporates during extended IEF runs. The situation is even worse in conventional carrier ampholyte IEF, where a steady-state distribution of thiol reducing agent can shorten a pH 3-10 gradient to a pH 3-7.5 span. We have shown in a recent series of papers that the number of this type of artifactual spots can be impressively large even in the case of simple polypeptides such as the human a- and r chains, which possess only one (a-) or two (/3-)-SH groups, respectively. 8-1~Figure 1 compares human a- and ~-globin chains solubilized in 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, reduced with TBP (left panel) and alkylated with acrylamide (right panel). The dry IPG strips (pH 6-11, 6.5 cm long and 4 mm wide, homemade) were rehydrated with the globin sample (ca. 4 mg/ml, 150 gl) for 4h (passive sample loading).

7

SOME PRACTICES AND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

151

FIGURE I Effect of alkylation prior to IEF. Purified human a- and ~-globin chains w e r e reduced with tributyl phosphine (left) o r reduced with tributyl phosphine and alkylated with acrylamide (right) prior to the IEF step of 2 - D E . T h e white spots show

where proteins were excised for MS analysis. The strings of spots on the left panel (reduced but not alkylated) are attributed to multimers of the two globin chains.The 2-DE gel positions of monomeric globin chains are shown on the right panel (reduced and alkylated).The high-M r spot on the right image is a carbonic anhydrase contaminant.

The numbered white spots in the 2-D images in Figure 1 are the spot excision marks where proteins have been cut for MS analysis. On the right 2-D gel, the higher M r spot is a carbonic anhydrase contaminant. In addition, failure to alkylate proteins prior to the IEF step can result in a substantial loss of spots on the 2-D gel, probably due to the fact that proteins, at their pI values, regenerate disulfide bridges with concomitant formation of aggregates which become entangled with and trapped within the polyacrylamide gel fibers. This strongly inhibits their transfer to the subsequent SDS-PAGE gel (data not shown). Even the addition of large quantities of reducing agents and subsequent alkylation in the IPG equilibration step, in the conventional protocol, is ineffective because SDS strongly inhibits-SH alkylation. 9 Similar results, supporting the use of alkylation, have recently been published. 11 In this work, Rabilloud and co-workers found that cysteine blocking highly increased resolution and decreased streaking, especially in the basic region of their 2-D gels. Poor alkylation efficiency can be obtained using iodoacetamide as the alkylating agent, especially in the presence of thiourea, which acts as a scavenger of iodoacetamide. If iodoacetamide is dissolved in a solubilizing mixture containing thiourea, but in the absence of sample proteins, it will be destroyed quite rapidly by thiourea. 1~When thiourea is used in the solubilizing solution, iodoacetamide should be added as a powder or in water just prior to alkylation. Prolonged alkylation reactions (-24 h) with iodoacetamide should be avoided because they can give rise to modifications of lysine and other amino acids such as methionine. 9,1~

152

B. HERBERT

To simplify the methodology of reduction and alkylation a very appealing option is to use acrylamide (or an activated double bond) as an alkylating agent instead of iodoacetamide. 8-1~In fact, at pH values at which alkylation is customarily performed, iodoacetamide and acrylamide have similar reactivity rates on ionized-SH groups. Acrylamide does not react with TBP, so the reduction and alkylation can be done in a single step (containing 5 mM TBP and 15 mM acrylamide), resulting in a significant saving in time. Furthermore, acrylamide does not seem to react with thiourea or amino acid groups other than cysteine.

III. BETA ELIMINATION OF CYSTEINE

Apart from preventing disulfide reformation, alkylation has another benefit in preventing artifactual ~3-elimination of cysteine during electrophoresis. ~-elimination, which results in the loss of an H2S group (34 Da) from Cys residues of proteins focusing in the alkaline pH region, has recently been reported. 13 The confirmation of ~-elimination occurence was obtained by trapping an alkaline protein in an electric field using a multicompartment electrolyzer (MCE; Proteome Systems Ltd., Sydney). A sample of lysozyme was solubilized in 8 M urea and focused in a four-chamber MCE for up to 48 h. The chambers of the MCE were separated by acrylamide/Immobiline membranes (7.5%T, 10%C) cast onto glass fiber discs (2 mm x 24 mm, pore size 2.7 gm). The immobilized pH discs had pH values of 3.0, 8.0, and 11.0 constructed according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. Lysozyme was loaded into the alkaline pH 8.0-11.0 chamber of the MCE. Focusing was for 4 h at 100 V followed by 44 h at constant 1 W and temperature was monitored regularly using a thermocouple thermometer. A control sample under static, non-electric field conditions was solubilized in 8 M urea in sodium borate (pH 9.0) and maintained at an equivalent temperature to the MCE sample for 48 h. Conductivity measurements of the MCE chamber solutions and the control sample were regularly made using a micro-conductivity meter. Figures 2a and b show a series of mass spectra over a 24 h time course of MCE electrophoresis. At time zero (Figure 2a) the starting unalkylated lysozyme shows the correct mass of 14313 Da. After 6 h in the electric field, the spectrum reveals two additional compounds, one centered at m/z 14278 (corresponding to the loss of 34 Da) and one at m/z 14215 (loss of 98 Da). Such M r decrements are consistent with the loss of one and three H2S groups, respectively. In Figure 2b, the expanded mass spectra show the starting lysozyme in the upper panel (the peak at 7159 is the doubly charged ion) and the massive degradation after 24 h electrolysis in the lower panel. The process taking place is ~elimination from Cys residues, transforming

7

SOMEPRACTICESAND PITFALLSOF SAMPLEPREPARATION

153

FIGURE 2 Electrophoretic ~-elimination of cysteine. MALDI-TOF-MS spectra of lysozyme after 0 h (upper tracing), 6 h (middle spectrum), or 24 h (lower tracing) of electrophoresis in an MCE are shown. After 24 h of electrophoresis, nearly all of the native lysozyme has been replaced by a series of degradation products consistent with the loss of up to five HzS units.

them into dehydro-alanine residues. If the process is continued for 24 h, the peak of the intact protein disappears, giving rise to a heterogeneous spectrum of peaks exhibiting progressive mass losses down to m/z 14152. This seems to be an electrically driven process, since the control lysozyme

154

B. HERBERT

solution, which was left standing in a test tube for the same time intervals at the same pH, did not show any degradation (not shown). Upon such an elimination event, a dehydro-alanine residue is generated at the Cys site. In turn, the presence of a double bond in this position elicits lysis of the peptide bond, often generating a number of peptides of fairly large size from an intact protein. The first process seems to be favored by the electric field, probably due to the continuous harvesting of the SH- anion produced. The only remedy found for this degradation pathway is the reduction and alkylation of all Cys residues prior to their exposure to the electric field. Alkylation appears to substantially reduce both/3-elimination and the subsequent amido bond lysis. Figure 3 shows a time course of mass spectra of alkylated lysozyme which has been electrolysed in an MCE under the same conditions as the unalkylated lysozyme in Figure 2. It can be appreciated that alkylation is strongly protective against ]3-elimination. In the upper tracing (control) only the peak of intact, octaalkylated lysozyme appears at m/z 14882 (the peak at m/z 7425 being the doubly charged ion). After 24 h in the electric field, essentially the same two peaks are visible (lower spectra), with only traces of degraded products at m/z 14773 and 2712.

FIGURE 3 Alkylation prevents electrophoretic ~-elimination ofcysteine.MALDITOF-MS spectra of octa-alkylated lysozyme after Oh (upper spectrum) or 24h (lower spectrum) of electrophoresis in an MCE. The peak at m/z 7425 is that of the doubly charged ion. Alkylation strongly quenches the degradation of the protein into peptides.

7

SOMEPRACTICESAND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

155

IV. CARBAMYLATION

As discussed above, urea is the most commonly used chaotropic agent. Thiourea is increasingly being used in combination with urea in order to exploit its high denaturing ability. In solution, urea is in equilibrium with ammonium cyanate TM as shown in Figure 4. Urea solutions that are initially cyanate-free can be prepared by using mixed-bed ion exchangers, but the concentration of ammonium cyanate slowly increases over time until equilibrium is again reached. However, if a cyanate scavenger such as the e-amino group of lysine is present, the formation of cyanate will continue unabated until the scavenger is completely consumed. At temperatures below 37~ the degradation of urea proceeds slowly and concentrations of cyanate do not reach problematic levels within the time of most sample preparation procedures. Temperatures above 37~ accelerate the rate at which ammonium cyanate is produced and thus should be avoided when preparing protein samples in urea. Cyanate has been shown to react with nucleophilic groups such as the amino terminus of the protein, the amino side chains of lysine and arginine residues, and the sulfhydryl groups of cysteine residues. 1s,16 The reaction occurs more rapidly under alkaline conditions when the nucleophilic groups are deprotonated and thus more reactive. The relative reactivity of the residues is dependent on their individual pK~ values. The free base forms of aliphatic amines, such as the e-amino group of lysine, are present at very low concentrations below pH 8. The carbamylation reaction of amines by isocyanic acid is strongly pH-dependent and a pH of 8.5-9.5 is usually optimal for modifying lysine residues. In contrast, the R-amino groups at amino termini of the protein are neutral, with pK a values o f - 7 , and may be selectively modifed by reaction at near neutral pH 17. The carbamylation modification results in an increase of 43 AMU relative to the unmodified protein or peptide. TM One potential drawback of the reduction and alkylation procedure described above is the fact that the reaction requires alkaline pH to proceed. Unfortunately, the alkaline pH also ensures that lysine residues are deprotonated and reactive toward isocyanate. Under static conditions, i.e., not in an electric field, the cyanate is free to react with lysine and

F I G U R E 4 Degradation pathway of urea.The breakdown of urea to ammonium cyanate is driven by heat, time, and pH.

156

B. HERBERT

cause artifactual modifications. The basic recommendation for sample preparation is to minimize extraction time and ensure that the sample is kept as cool as possible during extraction and subsequent storage without causing urea precipitation and at least below 37~ at all times. Storage of urea-containing extracts should always be at 4~ for short periods and frozen for long-term storage. Despite the chemical potential for carbamylation under static conditions, it is clearly shown in Reference 19 that the progression of the reaction is quite slow and carbamylation was not detectable within the first 12 h at room temperature. Under dynamic conditions in an electric field during IEF, the kinetics of carbamylation is very different compared with the situation described above. During electrophoresis, the charged products of urea degradation are rapidly transported to the electrodes, thus affording them minimal opportunity to react with amino groups on proteins and peptides. The protective effect of the electric field is shown in Figure 5, where the spectra show MS analysis of a myoglobin peptide trapped in an alkaline chamber of a multicompartment electrolyser.

F I G U R E 5 Extent of carbamylation of a myoglobin peptide in the presence of 8 M urea in an electric field. The analysis was by MALDI-TOF-MS. Times of electrophoresis in an MCE are 0, 12, 24, and 48 h. There is no carbamylation of the sample kept in an electric field. The mass increase from 8162 to 8182 is due to the conversion of terminal methionine into homoserine lactone.

7

SOMEPRACTICESAND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

157

The mass increase from 8162 to 8182 is due to conversion of the terminal methionine into homoserine lactone. No peaks corresponding to the addition of 43 AMU were observed in the myoglobin peptide trapped in the MCE, even after 48 h of electrolysis in the alkaline chamber. The peptide was the only buffering species present in the alkaline MCE chamber. The pH of the chamber was close to 9.3, defined by the calculated pI of the peptide. The additional masses observed at 8390-8391 are unidentified contaminants. V. STABLE ISOTOPE LABELING-BASED QUANTITATION

A number of groups have adopted the isotopic labeling advantages of the isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) method and applied it to 2-D gels. Smolka et al. 2~ used the ICAT reagents to enable quantitative protein profiling of a yeast differential display. The method is based on the same strategy as the LC-MS ICAT experiments, that two or more isotopically encoded samples can be separated concurrently in the same gel. This works because proteins labeled with isotopically different affinity tag reagents precisely co-migrate during two-dimensional electrophoresis. In a variant of this approach, two groups have reported the use of deuterated acrylamide and normal acrylamide in isotopically coded 2-D gel experiments. 21,22 These tagging methods employ labels that couple with the reactive sulfhydryl groups of cysteine residues. So, the alkylation chemistry of cysteine turns out to be at the center of proteomics, from preventing artifactual spots and protein autodigestion to isotopically encoded quantitation. VI. SAMPLE HOMOGENIZATION AND NUCLEIC ACID REMOVAL

Nucleic acids are polyanions and bind to many proteins via electrostatic interactions. They, along with lipids, some polysaccharides, and ionic contaminants in protein samples give rise to severe streaking and other deleterious effects in IEE The ideal sample preparation for 2-D gels combines as many steps as possible designed to produce the best quality separations while minimizing sample losses. The need to remove contaminants governs the types of sample preparation methods that can be used with tissue or cellular samples. A. Mechanical Methods

Although each sample type poses its own challenges for effective preparation for IEF, for the most part, standard methods of protein extraction are effective. Common artifacts are easily avoided by means of a few

158

B. HERBERT

simple precautions. Tissues should be perfused with cold saline upon excision to remove blood, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored frozen until they are to be homogenized. Liberal use should be made of protease inhibitors and, when appropriate, phosphatase inhibitors as well. Protease inhibitor cocktails can be obtained from several suppliers. Popular mixtures include those sold by Sigma and "Complete" from Roche. Among its other notable properties, thiourea is an effective protease inhibitor. 23 Phosphatase inhibitors include NaVO 3 and NaE The enzyme inhibitors should be included in the lysis or grinding buffers so that they are present when the materials become warm upon homogenization. Standard methods for tissue grinding and cell homogenization 24 are applicable to IEF and 2-D PAGE. Most laboratories have access to various types of blenders and tissue grinders (such as the popular Dounce, Potter-Elvejhem, and Tenbroeck devices). The Polytron (Brinkmann) is a good general purpose homogenizer. Homogenization of tissues with handheld devices (Dounce, etc.) can be made easier by first freezing the tissues in liquid nitrogen then shattering them with a hammer, a mortar and pestle, or, a bit more sophisticated, with a "BioPulverizer" (BioSpec Products). In our laboratory the two most common methods for sample processing are ultrasonic probing and bead milling. These two methods provide a way to combine tissue disintegration, protein extraction, and nucleic acid shearing. Generally, the resultant small nucleic acid fragments do not interfere with IEF and no further removal is required. The sonic probe works by converting high-frequency electrical energy into mechanical vibrations. The vibrations are transmitted down the horn tip of the instrument which is immersed in the sample solubilization cocktail causing cavitation, which is the implosion of microscopic cavities in the solution. This results in the disruption of cell walls and plasma membranes. At high energies, the ultrasonic probe efficiently disintegrates soft tissue such as heart, brain, and liver. Harder tissues may require some prechopping with a scalpel or in extreme cases grinding to a powder in liquid nitrogen. Our normal protocol is to sonicate the cell suspension for a total of 1 min, with four 15 s blasts with cooling of the sample on ice between each sonication blast. Bead mills operate just as their name implies. Metal or glass beads are made to collide at high velocity with the sample material suspended in solubilization cocktail. The system mainly used in our laboratory involves the use of a single 3 mm tungsten carbide bead. Homogenization of the sample tissue is bought about by the shaking movement of the sample vessel and grinding of the balls against the sample and vessel wall. The sample containers oscillate in a horizontal plane as shown in Figure 6. The oscillation frequency can be set at any level from 3 to about 30 Hz (180-1800 rpm). During the entire grinding process, an electronic speed control compares the actual speed to the preset value and keeps it constant. The grinding and mixing period can be preset digitally for

7

SOME PRACTICESAND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

159

F I G U R E 6 Bead mills.Two-bead (upper) and one-bead (lower) mills are shown. Horizontal oscillation of the units causes the tungsten beads to pulverize cellular material in the chambers.

10 s to 99 min. Devices of this type are available from a variety of distributors, e.g., Cole-Parmer.

B. Enzymatic Methods of Nucleic Acid Removal The best enzymatic nucleic acid removal is obtained using a genetically engineered endonuclease, Benzonase, from Merck. 25 The activity of Benzonase is enhanced in urea/thiourea denaturing solutions, as the nucleic acid substrates are denatured thus enabling their more rapid digestion. However, the Benzonase is itself denatured within 10-15 min. However, for the majority of samples, the nucleic acids have been sufficiently digested by then to enable high-quality separations.

C. Centrifugal Methods For some sample types, particularly mammallian cell lines, where the ratio of nucleic acid to protein is higher than normal, the mechanical and enzymatic methods of nucleic acid removal are not sufficient. Even though there may be substantial degradation of the nucleic acid, there are too many fragments remaining in solution to enable high-quality separations. In these cases, it is crucial to remove as much nucleic acid material as possible prior to lEE A convenient and efficient method of nucleic acid removal is to complex the nucleic acids with the tetravalent cation spermine. 26,27 Even in the presence of protein and denaturants, spermine is highly selective for nucleic acids and enables a high recovery of protein after centrifugation to pellet the spermine-nucleic acid complex. In addition, the complexing of nucleic acid and spermine releases proteins which may have been bound to DNA or RNA. Figure 7 shows two samples of

160

B. HERBERT

F I G U R E 7 D N A removal with spermine.Two-dimensional gel images of SH-SY5Y cell lysates without spermine treatment (left) and with nucleic acid removal by spermine (right) are shown. More protein is recovered from the spermine-treated lysate, particularly in the basic region of the gel.

SH-SY5Y cell lysates; 2-D gel without nucleic acid removal (left panel) and the gel with spermine treatment (right panel). More protein is recovered from the spermine-treated lysate, particularly in the basic region of the gel. This makes sense since basic proteins have greater propensity to bind anionic DNA through electrostatic interactions. The sample shown in Figure 7 was fractionated by liquid-phase IEF in an MCE and the subsequent protein assay indicated that 41% more protein was recovered in the pH 8-11 fraction of the sperminetreated sample. D. Precipitation from Organic Solvents

In a great many instances, the highest quality, least streaked IEF or 2-D PAGE gels are obtained by precipitating the protein mixture from organic solvents just prior to loading. A variety of organic solvents have been used to separate proteins from deleterious contaminants, both those carried along with the sample and those added to it during preparation. The most generally applicable system appears to be precipitation of proteins with trichloroacetic acid containing deoxycholate followed by washing with acetone. 28 Kits for this procedure are available from Amersham, Bio-Rad, and Genotech. The ternary mixture of trim-butyl phosphate, acetone, and methanol appears to be very effective for purifying proteins from sources high in lipids. 29 The final pellets obtained by precipitation are dissolved in IEF/IPG solution and loaded directly onto gels. VII. MEMBRANE PROTEINS

Proteins are least soluble at their isoelectric points, an unfortunate fact and the Achilles heel of isoelectric focusing. At the isoelectric point, proteins are focused into highly concentrated bands and marginally soluble

7

161

SOME PRACTICES AND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

proteins tend to aggregate and take up permanent residence in the focusing gel despite the solubilizing effects of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in the second dimension. Membrane proteins can be among the worst offenders and so a dogma has developed that solubility alone is responsible for the fact that membrane proteins are under-represented on 2-D gel maps. However, as shown in Figure 8, the hydrophobicity distribution, measured by the grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY), of the predicted transmembrane proteins in yeast is essentially the same as the distribution for the entire genome. In fact, around 1300 of the predicted transmembrane proteins in yeast contain only 1 or 2 transmembrane domains. 3~ Over 80% of the predicted transmembrane proteins in yeast are also predicted to be of low abundance as determined by codon bias. 31 Therefore, solubility is not the complete answer and fractionation in combination with the correct solubilizing reagents will significantly increase the recovery of membrane proteins. On a proteome-wide scale, the average hydrophobicity (GRAVY) value of a protein is a good predictor of whether a protein will be observed on 2-D gels, 32 as proteins with GRAVY values above 0.4 are rarely detected on 2-D gels. To predict whether a single protein will be solubilized and detected on 2-D gels it is better to use the ratio of integral-membrane amino acids to non-membrane amino acids, with smaller numbers favoring solubility, as they reflect increased non-membrane content. 33 Sequentially extracting the sample with reagents of increasing solubilizing power is an effective strategy for removing the abundant soluble proteins and concentrating the less abundant and less soluble membrane proteins. Molloy et al. 34 used sequential extraction and 2-D gels to detect 11 integral outer-membrane proteins from E. Coli. Although these proteins

2500

?SO

1600

~00

u, tO00 o

-2,s

-2.0

~!

1

J - 1.5

1/HI l/

- 1,0 -0.$ ,@.0 GRAVY scorn

Membrane OW-s

1

nl

o.s

1.0

i .s

I

25o

All yeast ORFs

F I G U R E 8 Hydrophobicity distribution of yeast proteins. Grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) scores calculated for the entire predicted yeast proteome (solid bars) and for the predicted transmembrane proteins of yeast (stippled bars) are shown.

162

B. HERBERT

contained up to seven transmembrane domains, they were not hydrophobic as judged by GRAVY values and were readily solubilized after the more abundant soluble proteins had been removed. Recent papers have used a more aggressive type of sequential extraction where the membrane is stripped of peripheral proteins by incubation in sodium carbonate at pH 11. In a study of E. Coli, 80% of the integral outer-membrane proteins were detected on a single gel using the sodium carbonate, high pH membrane stripping method. 3s A study of yeast, made by combining literatureconfirmed and predicted membrane proteins, identified a total of 105 integral membrane proteins, which was 33% of the 323 unique proteins identified. 31

REFERENCES

1. Rabilloud, T. Solubilization of proteins for electrophoretic analysis. Electrophoresis 17:813-829, 1996. 2. Hjelmland, L. H. and Chrambach, A. Electrophoresis and electrofocusing in detergent containing media: a discussion of basic concepts. Electrophoresis 2:1-11, 1981. 3. Vilain, S., Cosett, P., Charlionet, R., Hubert, M., Lange, C., Junter, G.-A. and Jouenne, T. Substituting Coomassie Brilliant Blue for bromophenol blue in two-dimensional electrophoresis buffers improves the resolution of focusing patterns. Electrophoresis 22:4368-4374, 2001. 4. Herbert, B. R., Molloy, M. P., Gooley, A. A., Walsh, B. J., Bryson, W. G. and Williams, K. L. Improved protein solubility in two-dimensional electrophoresis using tributyl phosphine as reducing agent. Electrophoresis 19:845-851, 1998. 5. Chevallet, M., Santoni, V., Poinas, A., Rouquie, D., Fuchs. A., Keiffer, S., Rossignol, M., Lunardi, J. and Rabilloud, T. New zwitterionic detergents improve the analysis of membrane proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19: 1901-1909, 1998. 6. Rabilloud, T., Blisnick, T., Heller, M., Luche, S., Aebersold, R., Lunardi, J. and BraunBreton, C. Analysis of membrane proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis: comparison of the proteins extracted from normal or Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocyte ghosts. Electrophoresis 20:3603-3610, 1999. 7. Santoni, V., Molloy, M. and Rabilloud, T. Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible? Electrophoresis 21:1054-1070, 2000. 8. Herbert, B., Galvani, M., Hamdan, M., Oliveri, E., McCarthy, J., Pedersen, S. and Righetti, P. G. Reduction and alkylation of proteins in preparation of two-dimensional map analysis: why, when and how? Electrophoresis 22:2046-2057, 2001. 9. Galvani, M., Hamdan, M., Herbert, B. and Righetti, P. G. Alkylation kinetics of proteins in preparation for two-dimensional maps: a matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry investigation. Electrophoresis 22:2058-2065, 2001. 10. Galvani, M., Rovatti, L., Hamdan, M., Herbert, B. and Righetti, P. G. Protein alkylation in presence/absence of thiourea in proteome analysis: a matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight- mass spectrometry investigation. Electrophoresis 22:2066-2074, 2001. 11. Luche, S., Diemer, H., Tastet, C., Chevallet, M., Van Dorsselaer, A., Leize-Wagner, E. and Rabilloud, T. About thiol derivatization and resolution of basic proteins in twodimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 4:551-561, 2004.

7

SOME PRACTICES AND PITFALLS OF SAMPLE PREPARATION

163

12. Sickmann, A., Dormeyer, W., Wortelkamp, S., Woitalla, D., Kuhn, W. and Meyer, H. E. Indentification of proteins from human cerebrospinal fluid, separated by two dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 21:2721-2728, 2000. 13. Herber, B., Hopwood, F., Oxley, D., McCarthy, J., Laver, M., Grinyer, J., Goodall, A., Williams, K., Castagna, A. and Righetti, P. G. Beta-elimination: an unexpected artefact in proteome analysis. Proteomics 3:826-831, 2003. 14. Shapiro, R. Prebiotic cytosine synthesis: a critical analysis and implications for the origin of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:4396-4401, 1999. 15. Stark, G. R. Reactions of cyanate with functional groups of proteins. IV. Inertness of aliphatic hydroxyl groups. Formation of carbamyl- and acylhydantoins. Biochemistry 4:2363-2367, 1965. 16. Stark, G. R. Reactions of cyanate with functional groups of proteins. III. Reactions with amino and carboxyl groups. Biochemistry 4:1030-1036, 1965. 17. Anderson, N. L. and Hickman, B. J. Analytical techniques for cell fractions. XXIV. Isoelectric point standards for two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 93:312-320, 1979. 18. http://www.ionsource.com/Card/carbam/carbam.htm 19. McCarthy, J., Hopwood, F., Oxley, D., Laver, M., Castagna, A., Righetti, P. G., Williams, K. and Herbert, B. Carbamylation of proteins in 2-D electrophoresis--myth or reality? J. Proteome Res. 2:239-242, 2003. 20. Smolka, M., Zhou, H. and Aebersold, R. Quantitative protein profiling using twodimensional gel electrophoresis, isotope-coded affinity tag labeling, and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1:19-29, 2002. 21. Gehanne, S., Cecconi, D., Carboni, L., Righetti, P. G., Domenici, E. and Hamdan, M. Quantitative analysis of two-dimensional gel-separated proteins using isotopically marked alkylating agents and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16:1692-1698, 2002. 22. Sechi, S. A method to identify and simultaneously determine the relative quantities of proteins isolated by gel electrophoresis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16:1416-1424, 2002. 23. Castellanos-Serra, L. and Paz-Lago, D. Inhibition of unwanted proteolysis during sample preparation: evaluation of its efficiency in challenge experiments. Electrophoresis 23:1745-1753, 2002. 24. Link, A. J. (Ed.) 2-D Proteome Analysis Protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 1999. 25. Palacino, J. J., Sagi, D., Goldberg, M. S., Krauss, S., Motz, C., Klose, J. and Shen, J. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in Parkin-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 279:18614-18622, 2004. 26. Razin, S. and Rozansky, R. Mechanism of the antibacterial action of spermine. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 81:36-54, 1959. 27. Hoopes, B. C. and McClure, W. R. Studies on the selectivity of DNA precipitation by spermine. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:5493-5504, 1981. 28. Pohl, T. Concentration of proteins and removal of solutes. In Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 182 (M. P. Deutscher, Ed.) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 68-83, 1990. 29. Mastro, R. and Hall, M. Protein delipidation and precipitation by tri-n-butlyphosphate, acetone, and methanol. Anal. Biochem. 273:313-315, 1999. 30. Mewes, H. W., Frishman, D., Gruber. C., Geier, B., Haase, D., Kaps, A., Lemcke, K., Mannhaupt, G., Pfeiffer, F., Schiiller, C., Stocker, S. and Weill, B. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 28:37-40, 2000. 31. Pedersen, S. K., Harry, J. L., Sebastian, L., Baker, J., Traini, M. D., McCarthy, J. T., Manoharan, A., Wilkins, M. R., Gooley, A. A,, Righetti, P. G., Packer, N. H., Williams, K. L. and Herbert, B. R. Unseen proteome: mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2:303-311, 2003.

164

B. HERBERT

32. Wilkins, M. R., Gasteiger, E., Sanchez, J. C., Bairoch, A. and Hochstrasser, D. F. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis for proteome projects: effects of protein hydrophobicity and copy number. Electrophoresis 19:1501-1505, 1998. 33. Rabilloud, T. Personal communication. 34. Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Walsh, B. J., Tyler, M. I., Traini, M., Sanchez, J. C., Hochstrasser, D. F., Williams, K. L. and Gooley, A. A. Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19:837-844, 1998. 35. Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Slade, M. B., Rabilloud, T., Nouwens, A. S., Williams, K. L. and Gooley, A. A. Proteomic analysis of the Escherichia coli outer membrane. Eur. J. Biochem. 267:2871-2881, 2000.

8

PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS W A Y N E F. PAT T O N

Biochemistry Department, Perkin-ElmerLife Sciences,Boston,MA, USA

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX.

INTRODUCTION ORGANIC DYE STAINING SILVER STAINING REVERSE STAINING FLUORESCENCE STAINING LABEL-LESS DETECTION POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION DETECTION ACQUIRING IMAGES FROM STAINED GELS CONCLUSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

The very earliest attempts at isoelectric fractionation may be attributed to the studies of Ikeda and Suzuki in 1912, whereas modern day carrier ampholyte-mediated isoelectric focusing (IEF) coalesced in the 1950s and 1960s, mainly from Kolin's concept of focusing ions in a continuous pH gradient, Svensson-Rilbe's theoretical construct that proposed an approach to developing stable pH gradients upon applying an electric field, and Vesterberg's actual chemical synthesis of the necessary polydisperse mixture of charged molecules possessing good conducting and buffering capabilities. 1 Due to its relative simplicity in implementation, carrier ampholyte-mediated IEF remains a popular separation approach, being commonly employed in basic research, clinical chemistry, agriculture science, the food industry, and forensics. However, conventional IEF using carrier ampholytes does have several inherent weaknesses, such as the necessity for very low ionic strength operating conditions, a tendency for uneven conductivity and buffering capacity 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

165

166

W.F. PATTON

along the separation path, and a susceptibility to pH gradient instability (cathodic drift). This prompted the development of immobilized pH gradient (IPG) gel electrophoresis. 2 In place of the thousands of low-molecular-weight carrier ampholyte molecules, IPG technology utilizes a physically cast gradient of acidic and basic acrylamido derivatives covalently affixed to the polyacrylamide matrix. IPG gel electrophoresis has become particularly important as the first dimension component of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), although carrier ampholyte-mediated IEF still has its proponents. 3 Since both the fractionation methods are based upon isoelectric point, carrier ampholyte-mediated IEF and IPG electrophoresis should be considered complementary separation technologies. Few detection methods have been specifically developed for IEF gel electrophoresis, although many that were first devised for sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) have subsequently been adapted to the technique. 4-7 In order to detect proteins following their separation by IEF, selective removal of the carrier ampholytes from the gels is usually required prior to staining. 1 Most detection reagents in gel electrophoresis interact, at least to some extent, with the carrier ampholytes in IEF gels or with the amine and carboxyl functionalities of the IPG gel matrix, for the fundamental reason that these types of functionalities are usually quite similar to the targets of stains on proteins. 1 As with SDS-PAGE, Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) and silver staining are most routinely employed for detecting proteins in both the types of IEF electrophoresis. 4-7 Recently, fluorescent detection of proteins in IEF gels has also been accomplished using dyes such as the Nile Red and SYPRO | Ruby stains. 5,6 As a separation modality, 2-DE is certainly technically more challenging than one-dimensional IEF, but it is operationally simpler with respect to staining approaches since during the second dimension SDS-PAGE step, the pH generating components of IEF are reduced in concentration and largely relegated to the dye migration front in the case of carrier ampholytes or eliminated altogether in the case of IPG. Thus, in most instances, staining after 2-DE follows identical protocols as performed with standard SDS-PAGE. The most straight forward approach for making a particular stain suitable for detection of proteins in IEF gels is to precipitate the focused proteins with an acidic solution, such as 10% trichloroacetic acid and then elute the acid-soluble ampholytes by extensive washing, prior to application of the stain. ~ II. ORGANIC DYE STAINING

A wide variety of methods for staining proteins and peptides in IEF gels with colored dyes have been introduced over the past 40 years or so,

8

PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS

| 67

including Amido Black 10B, Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB R-250, CBB G-250), colloidal CBB, CBB/Crocein Scarlet, Fast Green FCF, Light Green SF, Bromophenol Blue, and colloidal Acid Violet 17. 4-11 Colored organic dyes, such as CBB R-250 and, to a lesser extent, Amido Black have endured the test of time as simple and convenient reagents for the general detection of proteins. 8-1~Although Amido Black was one of the earliest organic dyes used to visualize proteins after electrophoresis, it is now principally relegated to medium sensitivity colorimetric detection of electroblotted proteins on PVDF and nitrocellulose membranes, s,6 Fast Green and many of the other more esoteric organic dyes, originally applied to IEF staining, have all disappeared from the modern proteomics laboratory.11 Typically, the organic dyes are prepared in aqueous solutions containing methanol or ethanol in combination with some acid, such as acetic acid, phosphoric acid, perchloric acid, or trichloroacetic acid. The additives facilitate penetration of dyes into the polyacrylamide gel matrix, titration of the primary amine groups on proteins, so that they can interact optimally with anionic dyes and minimization of protein diffusion through their fixation in the matrix. Destaining formulations are often the same acidified alcoholic solutions, but without the dye being added, s-7 Staining and destaining are frequently performed in plastic food storage boxes, glass casserole trays, or photographic development trays with gentle agitation provided by an orbital shaker or a similar device. Such dye staining approaches are usually capable of detecting microgram to sub-microgram amounts of protein. A breakthrough in the organic dye staining approach came with the introduction of colloidal CBB staining using CBB G-250 (dimethylated CBB R-250) for background-free detection of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. 8 The colloidal staining method pushed the limits of protein detection down to approximately 8-10ng of protein. For IPG gels, most CBB stains suffer from highly colored background staining, but colloidal CBB is capable of staining the gels without the ensuing background problems. Protein stains, some supplied as ready-to-use solutions, are available from several commercial sources. III. SILVER STAINING

The first general silver staining method was devised in 1973 for detecting proteins separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, offering detection sensitivities roughly 10-20 times better than Amido Black stain. There was another 7 years before a method for silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels was introduced, which was at least 100 times more sensitive than standard CBB staining. 12,13 Shortly thereafter, an explosion of new silver staining methods ensued and quite rapidly

168

W.F. PATTON

silver staining took its place as the pre-eminent protein detection technique in biological research laboratories worldwide. 14-19 Silver staining allowed, for the first time, non-radioactive detection of proteins in the nanogram range instead of the microgram range. Two categories of silver staining have found widespread utility for the detection of proteins in polyacrylamide gels, the alkaline silver diamine, and the acidic silver nitrate methods. Both approaches depend upon an oxidation step followed by a reduction step that converts silver ions into metallic silver. The alkaline silver diamine methods originated from histological procedures, using ammonium hydroxide to form soluble silver diamine complexes followed by visualization through reduction of free silver ions with formaldehyde in an acidified developer. On the other hand, the acidic silver nitrate methods found their origins from photographic procedures and depend upon gel impregnation with silver ions at acidic pH, followed by reduction of silver ions to elemental metallic silver at alkaline pH using formaldehyde. Silver staining procedures are relatively complicated, resulting in numerous solution changes and carefully timed steps, s,7 Certainly, this is largely responsible for the continued reliance on CBB staining by many researchers. Due to the inherent complexity of silver staining procedures, spot intensities may vary significantly from run to run. The linear dynamic range of silver stain is exceedingly poor, only covering a 10-fold range of protein concentration, making detection of changes in protein expression levels difficult to determine. Finally, standard silver staining procedures require glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde, which alkylate a- and e-amino groups of proteins. Using silver staining procedures, the inherent advantage of higher detection sensitivity compared with CBB staining is offset by inferior sequence coverage in peptide mass fingerprinting experiments. Mass spectrometry-based analysis can be successfully performed if glutaraldehyde is omitted from the staining procedure, but such modified procedures are plagued by decreased staining sensitivity and uniformity as well as increased gel background. The additional step of destaining silver stained gel bands prior to enzymatic digestion reduces background interference and suppression of signals for MALDI-TOF-MS-based peptide mass analysis. 2~ Although no perfect solution is yet in hand, research efforts to solve silver stain's incompatibility problems with MS continue. 22 With respect to IEF in particular, it should be noted that the acidic silver nitrate staining procedures tend to stain basic proteins with slightly lower sensitivity and acidic proteins with higher sensitivity than alkaline silver diamine methods. Proteins separated using immobilized pH gradient gels are very poorly stained using the standard alkaline silver diamine methods. However, high background staining by this method can be minimized through extensive fixing and washing. It can also be noted that due to the volatile nature of ammonia, alkaline silver diamine methods are generally acknowledged as being more susceptible to run-to-run

8

PROTEIN DETECTION AND IHAGING IN IEF GELS

169

variation than the acidic silver nitrate methods. Silver stain kits are commercially available from the standard electrophoresis supply houses. IV. REVERSE STAINING

A number of reverse stain methods for the detection of proteins in SDS-polyacrylamide gels have been developed, three of which having gained some measure of popularity among practitioners of protein separations, s-7 These are the potassium chloride, copper chloride, and zinc chloride reverse stain methods. The latter two stains are available commercially. Reverse stains produce a semi-opaque background on the gel surface, which allows proteins to be detected as transparent zones when gels are viewed on a black background or with proper back illumination. Attractive features of the stains include their short staining protocols (5-15min to completion) and their ability to preserve the biological activity of the proteins. 23,24 Proteins may also be eluted from gels quite readily by chelation of the metal ions with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Reverse stains are thus well suited for detection of proteins, their passive elution from gels and their subsequent analysis by MS. It is noteworthy that among the common non-fluorescent detection methods, zinc-imidazole reverse staining in particular appears to have the fewest drawbacks with respect to use in protein mass profiling experiments. Sequence coverage is generally equivalent to or better than those obtained after CBB staining and since gels are not fixed, peptide yields are also superior. 23,24 However, in terms of quantitative capabilities, the stain is inferior to most other techniques, with the linear dynamic range for protein quantitation restricted to the microgram range. V. FLUORESCENCE STAINING

With the birth of proteomics in the mid-1990s there came renewed interest in protein detection technologies, s The interest was motivated by the need to combine high detection sensitivity with broad quantitation capabilities as well as to provide detection approaches that were more compatible with protein identification techniques, especially MS. Fluorescence-based detection came to the forefront because the detection of a fluorescent signal provides a linear response with respect to the amount of protein over a much wider range than is found for the nonfluorescent alternatives like CBB and silver staining. Among the nonfluorescent detection technologies available, only radiolabeling provides comparable capabilities. Three categories of fluorescent detection methods have gained prominence in the field of proteomics in recent years. The first category

170

W.F. PATTON

of stains interact with proteins indirectly and non-covalently. 2s-29 These fluorophores are virtually non-fluorescent in aqueous solution but become fluorescent upon binding to SDS-protein complexes. Since SDS binds to protein with a fairly constant stoichiometry, protein quantitation by this approach should be more reliable than methods based upon interacting with protein primary amines alone. Prominent stains belonging to this class are Nile Red dye, SYPRO Orange dye, SYPRO Red dye, SYPRO Tangerine dye, hydrophobic fluorescein dyes (5-dodecanoyl amino fluorescein, 5-hexadecanoyl amino fluorescein, and 5-octadecanoyl amino fluorescein), and Deep Purple TM dye. 25-29 Typically, this family of dyes provides detection sensitivities that are equivalent to colloidal CBB staining and rapid silver staining methods. Deep Purple dye and the hydrophobic fluorescein dyes, however, appear to be as sensitive as the highest quality silver staining methods. 2s,28 Surprisingly, fluorescent detection of proteins in IEF gels can be achieved using Nile Red dye as well as with SYPRO Red, Orange and Tangerine dyes. 26,27,29However, in order to accomplish this, gels must be preincubated in SDS since all of these lipophilic dyes bind to proteins indirectly through this anionic detergent. The principal disadvantages of using these fluorescent dyes to stain IEF gels are that detection sensitivity is often poorer than standard CBB staining and the incubation step in SDS is likely to lead to some loss of protein. The second category of fluorescent total protein stains comprises the colloidal luminescent transition metal complexes, such as the rutheniumbased SYPRO Ruby dye and the closely related (but not identical) fluorophore, ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate). 3~ These stains bind to proteins by a mechanism that is quite similar to CBB staining and are as sensitive as the best silver staining procedures available. The dyes are superior to silver staining with respect to linear dynamic range and downstream compatibility with MS-based protein identification techniques. SYPRO Ruby protein gel stain is notable in that it allows sensitive fluorescence detection of proteins in both IEF and IPG gels. 36 Protein bands are selectively stained while the polyacrylamide gel matrix remains unstained, in an analogous manner as with colloidal CBB staining (see Figure 1). One discrete zone of Ampholine brand carrier ampholytes (Amersham Life Sciences) has been observed to stain strongly with SYPRO Ruby dye, and this artifactual staining has been observed with other stains as well. 36,37 Other carrier ampholytes do not produce a similar staining artifact. In a quantitative study of 11 isoelectric point marker proteins, it was determined that SYPRO Ruby dye is typically 3-30 times more sensitive than acidic silver nitrate staining and colloidal CBB staining in polyacrylamide IEF gels. 36 Effective staining of agarose IEF gels is also feasible using the fluorescent stain. 36 Agarose may be stained by an identical procedure as used for polyacrylamide gels. An alternative

8

PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS

171

F I G U R E I Staining of broad range isoelectric point marker proteins with SYPRO Ruby dye. Electrophoresis was performed on Ampholine PAGplate (pH 3.5-9.5) gels (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, N J). Proteins were loaded in a 3-fold dilution series, with lane I containing - 3 - 7 I~g per band. Proteins are, from top to bottom, trypsinogen (pl -.30), lentil lectin (3 bands, 8.65, 8.45, 8.15), myoglobin, basic (7.35), myoglobin, acidic (6.85), human carbonic anhydrase (6.55), bovine carbonic anhydrase (5.85), ~-Iactoglobulin A (5.20), soybean trypsin inhibitor (4.55), amyloglucosidase (3.50). Courtesy of Dr.Thomas H. Steinberg, Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, Oregon.

method of staining proteins in agarose gels by drying the gels and floating them face down on the surface of the stain solution for 30min is also appropriate and detection sensitivity using either staining protocol is similar. 36 The final category of fluorophores commonly used for protein detection in gel electrophoresis is the amine-reactive and sulfhydryl-reactive fluorophores, particularly the cyanine dyes. 38-4~In the most commonly implemented form of difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE), NHS esters of cyanine dyes are employed to pre-label two or three different protein samples prior to running them on the same 2-D gel, allowing the samples

172

W.F. PAI'TON

to be processed under identical electrophoretic conditions in a type of differential display format. 38 The cyanine dyes have been carefully designed to be charge and mass matched so that they migrate to the same position on a 2-D gel. Although no specific references concerning the use of cyanine dyes in IEF gels alone are available, the labeling method is used with 2-DE routinely and thus, should be considered fully compatible with IEF gel electrophoresis as well. VI. LABEL-LESS DETECTION

One of the more innovative label-less detection approaches involving IEF gels relies upon laser desorption of proteins directly from dried carrier ampholyte IEF or IPG gels by scanning the laser beam of a MALDI-TOF-MS across the surface of the strip. Sub-picomolar detection sensitivities are achievable with this technique. The approach is referred to as "virtual" 2-D gels, since MS is substituted for SDS-PAGE to construct 2-D protein profiles on a computer s c r e e n , 41-43 i.e., the analytical data are displayed as a computer-generated image that is similar to a classical 2-D gel in appearance. A number of methodological artifacts associated with the technique have prevented its widespread adoption, including higher molecular masses than predicted due to difficulty in desorbing proteins from the gel matrix, horizontal streaks arising from variations in baseline slope, artifacts caused by the presence of protein multimers and matrix adducts on the proteins that produce duplicate or triplicate spots in the image, and difficulty in quantifying the amounts of the proteins due to ion suppression phenomenon. The procedure is also currently quite slow, requiring a day to run the gel, 2 days to dry it down and another 2 days to acquire the spectra. Recently, sensitive direct detection of proteins in polyacrylamide gels has been accomplished by imaging the weak fluorescent signal generated by tyrosine and tryptophan residues in proteins upon illumination with 280 nm ultraviolet radiation. 44,4s Detection sensitivities of 5 ng protein have been reported using either ultraviolet light laser excitation with a photomultiplier tube-detector or Hg (Xe) lamp excitation with a CCD camera detector. 44 ,45 Imaging proteins at 230nm through the peptide bond itself is compromised by the absorption of the polyacrylamide matrix and carrier ampholytes at this wavelength. VII. POST-TRANSLATIONALMODIFICATION DETECTION

One of the more important challenges facing the field of proteomics is to reveal rapidly and comprehensively protein post-translational modifications. 7 Two important protein post-translational modifications,

8

PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS

173

glycosylation and phosphorylation, are now readily detectable after PAGE using commercially available kits and instrumentation. A sensitive green-fluorescent glycoprotein-specific stain, Pro-Q | Emerald 300 dye, detects glycoproteins directly in polyacrylamide gels or on PVDF membranes. 46-48 The dye is conjugated to glycoproteins by the standard periodic acid Schiff's base (PAS) conjugation mechanism using ambient reaction conditions. As little as 300 pg of al-acid glycoprotein (40% carbohydrate) can be detected in gels with the dye, and the linear dynamic range of detection extends over a 2-3 order of magnitude range. 46 However, the dye requires UV illumination, rendering it unsuitable for laser-based gel scanners. A related stain, Pro-Q Emerald 488 dye, allows detection of glycoproteins using visible light excitation sources, but unfortunately the alternate stain is about 10-fold less sensitive than the UV-excitable dye. 47 Pro-Q Diamond phosphoprotein stain readily detects phosphoproteins containing phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, and phosphotyrosine residues on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, isoelectric focusing gels, 2-D gels, electroblots, and protein microarrays by a mechanism that combines a chelating fluorophore and a transition metal ion. 49-51 The staining is relatively rapid, simple to perform, readily reversible, and fully compatible with modern microchemical analysis procedures, such as MALDI-TOF-MS. Pro-Q Diamond dye can detect as little as 8 ng of pepsin, a monophosphorylated protein, and i ng of proteins with two or more phosphate residues, such as ovalbumin and/3-casein, sl The linear response of the fluorescent dye allows rigorous quantitation of phosphorylation changes over a 2-3 order of magnitude concentration range. Detection of phosphoproteins separated in IEF gels using Pro-Q Diamond dye initially presented certain challenges relative to standard SDS-polyacrylamide gels. 49 As found for other staining methods employed for detecting proteins in IEF gels, staining of phosphoproteins with Pro-Q Diamond dye was readily achieved after precipitating the proteins in 10% trichloroacetic acid/40% methanol and eluting the ampholytes by extensive washing. VIII. ACQUIRING IMAGES FROM STAINED GELS

The introduction of fluorescent dye technology in particular has played a crucial role in the development of advanced imaging instrumentation, s2-s4 The most common imaging instruments for protein visualization from electrophoresis gels use either a gas discharge transilluminator and charge-coupled device (CCD) camera or a photomultiplier tube and laser scanner. CCD cameras (14- or 16-bit cooled) are usually employed in CCD camera-based gel imagers, providing excellent quantitative information over a concentration range of 3 to 4

174

W.F. PATTON

orders of magnitude. However, the spatial resolution of most fixed CCD camera systems is poorer in comparision with laser scanners. CCD camera-based imaging systems typically use UV or white light illumination, although high-pressure xenon-arc sources that provide broad-band wavelength coverage are also available. For example, the ProXPRESS TM 2D Proteomic Imaging System (Perkin-Elmer) is a sensitive imaging instrument that enables the use of a wide range of fluorescent and colored dyes due to its CCD camera and multi-wavelength emission and excitation capabilities. 55,56 The high-pressure xenon arc lamp of the instrument provides broad-band wavelength coverage and requires modest power, allowing visualization of the wide range of dyes commonly encountered in proteomics investigations, including Coomassie Blue, Amido Black, silver, colloidal gold (for blots), and the variety of fluorescent dyes now available. While the spatial resolution of conventional fixed CCD camera imaging systems is typically inferior to laserbased gel scanners and photographic film, this problem is circumvented with the ProXPRESS instrument by mechanically scanning the CCD camera over the gel or blot and collecting multiple images that are subsequently automatically reconstructed into a complete image. 55,56 (see Figure 2). Thus, the system readily delivers the same spatial resolution obtained with high-end laser scanners (33 ~tm). By acquiring images in succession, as many as four different fluorescent labels may be viewed from a single gel. Commonly used light sources in laser scanning devices include a diode laser (635 nm), helium-neon (He-Ne) laser (633 nm), argon-ion (Ar) laser (514nm, 488 nm), frequency-doubled neodymium-yttriumaluminum-garnet (Nd-YAG) laser (532nm), and second-harmonic generation (SHG) laser (532nm, 473nm). s2-s4 Two or more laser sources are often incorporated into commercial gel scanners, allowing a wider number of fluorophores to be detected with the instruments. While laser scanners are substantially slower than fixed CCD camerabased imaging devices, they provide 50-801am spatial resolution which is vastly superior to the 200 ~m spatial resolution obtained with standard fixed CCD cameras (cited resolution based upon imaging a 20 cm • 20 cm 2-D gel). Another disadvantage of laser scanners is that they are limited to imaging fluorophores that spectrally match the output of their laser sources. The systems lack the capability to image UV-excitable dyes, such as Pro-Q Emerald 300 glycoprotein stain and detect colored stains, such as CBB and silver, by a round about method. Gels stained by these methods are scanned with a fluorescent sheet behind them in order to generate a negative image. The negative image is then inverted using computer software to display the staining profile. The dynamic quantitation range obtained by this approach appears to be inferior to that obtained by standard direct imaging

8

PROTEINDETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS

175

F I G U R E 2 Schematic diagram of the components of a xenon arc/UV transilluminator CCD camera-based imaging device.The basic components of the ProXPRESS 2D Proteomic Imaging System (Perkin-Elmer) are shown in the diagram. This instrument allows multiple modes of illumination and has multi-wavelength capability provided by the 6-position excitation and emission filter wheels. Laser scanner~ like resolution is achieved by mechanically scanning the CCD camera over the sample and collecting multiple images that are subsequently automatically reconstructed into a complete image.The main component in such systems is the detect o r assembly, consisting of the cooled CCD camera, filter wheel, optics, and scanning mechanism. The two-axis scanning mechanism also carries a m i r r o r and the two top illumination light guides, which move with the camera and filter wheel across the image scanning area. The xenon-arc excitation lamp, excitation filter wheel and power supplies are mounted on the bottom panel at the rear frame of the instrument. A UV transUluminator is situated directly beneath the sample carrier. Courtesy of Dr. Elaine Scrivener, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Seer Green, England.

methods. When imaging conventional colored stains, such as silver and Coomassie Blue stain, often a simple document scanner is sufficient to obtain satisfactory images. Public domain software, such as NIH Image (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/) or Image J (http:// rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) may be used to quantify protein bands from such gel images.

176

W.F. PATTON

IX. CONCLUSION One could reasonably argue that like thin-layer chromatography and previously paper chromatography, IEF in gels has matured as a technique and only rarely captures the imagination of scientific innovators seeking to push the envelope of technological capabilities in biological analysis. With respect to research on detection approaches in IEF gels, new publications in the peer-reviewed literature are very few and far between. More often than not, new detection approaches are developed with the viewpoint of SDS-PAGE or 2-DE. IEF gels are subsequently tested as an afterthought. Despite this, gel-based IEF has a strong worldwide user base that supports a commercial pipeline of instrumentation as well as consumable products and will thus certainly remain a relatively low-cost, routine laboratory technique for many years to come. Meanwhile, the foundation technology of IEF gel electrophoresis, rather than simply rusting away in the dank recesses of some musty old basement laboratory, actually appears to be undergoing a rebirth of sorts in the miniaturized world of IEF chips and microfluidic devices, sT-s9

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ProXPRESS is a trademark of Perkin-Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences. SYPRO and Pro-Q are registered trademarks of Molecular Probes, Inc. Deep Purple is a trademark of Amersham Life Sciences.

REFERENCES 1. Righetti, P. Theory and fundamental aspects of IEF. In Isoelectric Focusing: Theory, Methodology and Applications (Work, T. and Burdon, R. Eds.) Elsevier, NY, 1983. 2. Righetti, P. The chemicals. In Immobilized pH gradients: Theory and Methodology (Burdon, R. and van Knippenberg, P. Eds.) Elsevier, NY, 1990. 3. Lopez, M. F. and Patton, W. F. Reproducibility of polypeptide spot positions in twodimensional gels run using carrier ampholytes in the isoelectric focusing dimension. Electrophoresis 18:338-343, 1997. 4. Allen, R. C. and Budowle, B. In Protein Staining and Identification Techniques, BioTechniques Books, Division of Eaton Publishing, Westborough, MA, 1999. 5. Patton, W. F. A thousand points of light: the application of fluorescence detection technologies to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and proteomics. EIectrophoresis 21:1123-1144, 2000. 6. Patton, W. F. Detection technologies in proteome analysis. J. Chromatogr. B 771:3-31, 2002. 7. Wirth, P. J. and Romano, A. Staining methods in gel electrophoresis, including the use of multiple detection methods. J. Chromatogr. A 698:123-143, 1995. 8. Neuhoff, V., Arold, N., Taube, D. and Ehrhardt, W. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at

8

PROTEINDETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS

9.

10. 11. 12.

13. 14. 15.

16. 17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

|77

nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis 9:255-262, 1988. Reisner, A. H., Nemes, P. and Bucholtz, C. The use of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G250 perchloric acid solution for staining in electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 64:509-516, 1975. Vesterberg, O., Hansen, L. and Sjosten, A. Staining of proteins after isoelectric focusing in gels by new procedures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 491:160-166, 1977. Allen, R. E., Masak, K. C. and McAllister, P. K. Staining protein in isoelectric focusing gels with Fast Green. Anal. Biochem. 104:494-498, 1980. Rabilloud, T., Vuillard, L., Gilly, C. and Lawrence, J. J. Silver-staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels: a general overview. Cell. Mol. Biol. (Noisy-le-grand). 40:57-75, 1994. Rabilloud, T. Mechanisms of protein silver staining in polyacrylamide gels: a 10-year synthesis. Electrophoresis 11:785-794, 1990. Mehta, P. D. and Patrick, B. A. Detection of oligoclonal bands in unconcentrated CSF: isoelectric focusing and silver staining. Neurology 33:1365-1368, 1983. Mehta, P. D., Patrick, B. A. and Black, J. Detection of oligoclonal IgG bands in unconcentrated CSF by isoelectric focusing in agarose gel and silver staining. J. Neurosci. Methods 16:277-282, 1986. Roos, R. P. and Lichter, M. Silver staining of cerebrospinal fluid IgG in isoelectric focusing gels. J. Neurosci. Methods 8:375-380, 1983. Trbojevic-Cepe, M., Poljakovic, Z., Franjic, J., Bielen, I. and Vranes, Z. Detection of oligoclonal IgG bands in unconcentrated CSF in multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases by isoelectric focusing on ultrathin-layer polyacrylamide gel immunofixation and silver staining. Neurologija 38:11-21, 1989. Warlow, R. S., Morgan, J., Nicola, N. and Bernard, C. C. A nondenaturing vertical isoelectric focusing polyacrylamide slab gel system suitable for silver staining and electrophoretic blotting. Anal. Biochem. 175:474-481, 1988. Wikkelso, C., Andersson, M., Andersson, R. and Blomstrand, C. Isoelectric focusing followed by silver staining. A suitable method for routine investigation of cerebrospinal fluid proteins. Eur. Neurol.; 23:306-312, 1984. Yan, J. X., Wait, R., Berkelman, T., Harry, R. A., Westbrook, J. A., Wheeler, C. H. and Dunn, M. J. A modified silver staining protocol for visualization of proteins compatible with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 21:3666-3672, 2000. Sumner, L. W., Wolf-Sumner, B., White, S. P. and Asirvatham, V. S. Silver stain removal using HEO2 for enhanced peptide mass mapping by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16:160-168, 2002. Richert, S., Luche, S., Chevallet, M., Van Dorsselaer, A., Leize-Wagner, E. and Rabilloud, T. About the mechanism of interference of silver staining with peptide mass spectrometry. Proteomics 4:909-916, 2004. Castellanos-Serra, L., Vallin, A., Proenza, W., Le Caer, J. P. and Rossier, J. An optimized procedure for detection of proteins on carrier ampholyte isoelectric focusing and immobilized pH gradient gels with imidazole and zinc salts: its application to the identification of isoelectric focusing separated isoforms by in-gel proteolysis and mass spectrometry analysis. Electrophoresis 22:1677-1685, 2001. Hardy, E. and Castellanos-Serra, L. R. "Reverse-staining" of biomolecules in electrophoresis gels: analytical and micropreparative applications. Anal. Biochem. 328:1-13, 2004. Mackintosh, J., Choi, H., Bae, S., Veal, D., Bell, P., Ferrari, B., Van Dyk, D., Verrills, N., Paik, Y. and Karuso, P. A fluorescent natural product for ultra sensitive detection of proteins in one-dimensional and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 3:2273-2288, 2003.

178

W.F. PATTON

26. Bermudez, A., Daban, J. R., Garcia, J. R. and Mendez, E. Direct blotting, sequencing and immunodetection of proteins after five-minute staining of SDS and SDS-treated IEF gels with Nile red. Biotechniques 16:621-624, 1994. 27. Steinberg, T. H., Jones, L. J., Haugland, R. P. and Singer, V. L. SYPRO orange and SYPRO red protein gel stains: one-step fluorescent staining of denaturing gels for detection of nanogram levels of protein. Anal. Biochem. 239:223-237, 1996. 28. Kang, C., Kim, H. J., Kang, D., Jung, D. Y. and Suh, M. Highly sensitive and simple fluorescence staining of proteins in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide-based gels by using hydrophobic tail-mediated enhancement of fluorescein luminescence. Electrophoresis 24:3297-3304, 2003. 29. Steinberg, T. H., Lauber, W. M., Berggren, K., Kemper, C., Yue, S. and Patton, W. F. Fluorescence detection of proteins in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels using environmentally benign, nonfixative, saline solution. Electrophoresis 21:497-508, 2000. 30. Berggren, K., Chernokalskaya, E., Steinberg, T. H., Kemper, C., Lopez, M. F., Diwu, Z., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Background-free, high sensitivity staining of proteins in one- and two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels using a luminescent ruthenium complex. Electrophoresis 21:2509-2521, 2001. 31. Berggren, K. N., Schulenberg, B., Lopez, M. F., Steinberg, T. H., Bogdanova, A., Smejkal, G., Wang, A. and Patton, W. F. An improved formulation of SYPRO Ruby protein gel stain: comparison with the original formulation and with a ruthenium I! tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) formulation. Proteomics 2:486-498, 2002. 32. Lamanda, A., Zahn, A., Roder, D. and Langen, H. Improved Ruthenium II tris (bathophenantroline disulfonate) staining and destaining protocol for a better signalto-background ratio and improved baseline resolution. Proteomics 4:599-608, 2004. 33. Lopez, M. F., Berggren, K., Chernokalskaya, E., Lazarev, A., Robinson, M. and Patton, W. F. A comparison of silver stain and SYPRO Ruby Protein Gel Stain with respect to protein detection in two-dimensional gels and identification by peptide mass profiling. Electrophoresis 21:3673-3683, 2000. 34. Nishihara, J. C. and Champion, K. M. Quantitative evaluation of proteins in one- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels using a fluorescent stain. Electrophoresis 23:2203-2215, 2002. 35. Rabilloud, T., Strub, J. M., Luche, S., van Dorsselaer, A. and Lunardi, J. A comparison between Sypro Ruby and ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) as fluorescent stains for protein detection in gels. Proteomics 1:699-704, 2001. 36. Steinberg, T. H., Chernokalskaya, E., Berggren, K., Lopez, M. F., Diwu, Z., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Ultrasensitive fluorescence protein detection in isoelectric focusing gels using a ruthenium metal chelate stain. Electrophoresis 21:486-496, 2000. 37. Otavsky, W. I. and Drysdale, J. W. Recent staining artifacts with LKB "Ampholines" on gel isoelectric-focusing. Anal. Biochem. 65:533-536, 1975. 38. Unlu, M., Morgan, M. E. and Minden, J. S. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 18:2071-2077, 1997. 39. Tonge, R., Shaw, J., Middleton, B., Rowlinson, R., Rayner, S., Young, J., Pognan, F., Hawkins, E., Currie, I. and Davison, M. Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 1:377-396, 2001. 40. Shaw, J., Rowlinson, R., Nickson, J., Stone, T., Sweet, A., Williams, K. and Tonge, R. Evaluation of saturation labelling two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis fluorescent dyes. Proteomics 3:1181-1195, 2003. 41. Loo, R. R., Cavalcoli, J. D., VanBogelen, R. A., Mitchell, C., Loo, J. A., Moldover, B. and Andrews, P. C. Virtual 2-D gel electrophoresis: visualization and analysis of the E. coli proteome by mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 73:4063-4070, 2001.

8

PROTEIN DETECTION AND IMAGING IN IEF GELS

179

42. Ogorzalek, Loo, R. R., Mitchell, C., Stevenson, T. I., Martin, S. A., Hines, W. M., Juhasz, P., Patterson, D. H., Peltier, J. M., Loo, J. A. and Andrews, P. C. Sensitivity and mass accuracy for proteins analyzed directly from polyacrylamide gels: implications for proteome mapping. Electrophoresis 18:382-390, 1997. 43. Walker, A. K., Rymar, G. and Andrews, P. C. Mass spectrometric imaging of immobilized pH gradient gels and creation of "virtual" two-dimensional gels. Electrophoresis 22:933-945, 2001. 44. Roegener, J., Lutter, P., Reinhardt, R., Bluggel, M., Meyer, H. E. and Anselmetti, D. Ultrasensitive detection of unstained proteins in acrylamide gels by native UV fluorescence. Anal. Chem. 75:157-159, 2003. 45. Sluszny, C. and Yeung, E. S. One-and two-dimensional miniaturized electrophoresis of proteins with native fluorescence detection. Anal. Chem. 76:1359-1365, 2004. 46. Steinberg, T. H., Pretty. On Top, K., Berggren, K. N., Kemper, C., Jones, L., Diwu, Z., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Rapid and simple single nanogram detection of glycoproteins in polyacrylamide gels and on electroblots. Proteomics 1:841-855, 2001. 47. Hart, C., Schulenberg, B., Steinberg, T. H., Leung, W. Y. and Patton, W. F. Detection of glycoproteins in polyacrylamide gels and on electroblots using Pro-Q Emerald 488 dye, a fluorescent periodate Schiff-base stain. Electrophoresis 24:588-598, 2003. 48. Schulenberg, B., Beechem, J. M. and Patton, W. F. Mapping glycosylation changes related to cancer using the Multiplexed Proteomics technology: a protein differential display approach. J. Chromatogr. B 793:127-139, 2003. 49. Martin, K., Steinberg, T. H., Goodman, T., Schulenberg, B., Kilgore, J. A., Gee, K. R., Beechem, J. M. and Patton, W. F. Strategies and solid-phase formats for the analysis of protein and peptide phosphorylation employing a novel fluorescent phosphorylation sensor dye. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 6:331-339, 2003. 50. Schulenberg, B., Aggeler, R., Beechem, J. M., Capaldi, R. A. and Patton, W. F. Analysis of steady-state protein phosphorylation in mitochondria using a novel fluorescent phosphosensor dye. J. Biol. Chem. 278:27251-27255, 2003. 51. Steinberg, T. H., Agnew, B. J., Gee, K. R., Leung, W. Y., Goodman, T., Schulenberg, B., Hendrickson, J., Beechem, J. M., Haugland, R. P. and Patton, W. F. Global quantitative phosphoprotein analysis using Multiplexed Proteomics technology. Proteomics 3:1128-1144, 2003. 52. Patton, W. Biologist's perspective on analytical imaging systems as applied to protein gel electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A. 698:55-87, 1995. 53. Patton, W. F. Making blind robots see: the synergy between fluorescent dyes and imaging devices in automated proteomics. Biotechniques 28:944-948, 950-957, 2000. 54. Miura, K. Imaging and detection technologies for image analysis in electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 22:801-813, 2001. 55. Herick, K., Jackson, P., Wersch, G. and Burkovski, A. Detection of fluorescence dyelabeled proteins in 2-D gels using an Arthur 1442 Multiwavelength Fluoroimager. Biotechniques 31:146-149, 2001. 56. Lopez, M. F., Mikulskis, A., Golenko, E., Herick, K., Spibey, C. A., Taylor, I., Bobrow, M. and Jackson, P. High-content proteomics: fluorescence multiplexing using an integrated, high-sensitivity, multiwavelength charge-coupled device imaging system. Proteomics 3:1109-1116, 2003. 57. Mok, M. L., Hua, L., Phua, J. B., Wee, M. K. and Sze, N. S. Capillary isoelectric focusing in pseudo-closed channel coupled to matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry for protein analysis, Analyst Feb.129:109-110, 2004. 58. Zilberstein, G. V., Baskin, E. M. and Bukshpan, S. Parallel processing in the isoelectric focusing chip. Electrophoresis 24:3735-3744, 2003. 59. Li, Y., Buch, J. S., Rosenberger, F., DeVoe, D. L. and Lee, C. S. Integration of isoelectric focusing with parallel sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis for multidimensional protein separations in a plastic microfluidic network. Anal. Chem. 76:742-748, 2004.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

9

CAPILLARY ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING TIM WEHR

Life Science Group, Bio-Rad Laboratories, 6000 James Watson Drive, Hercules, CA 945 74

I. II. III. IV. V.

VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. XII.

INTRODUCTION SAMPLE PREPARATION AMPHOLYTE SELECTION AND SAMPLE INTRODUCTION FOCUSING MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES A. Two-step clEF B. Single-step clEF CAPILLARY SELECTION MINIMIZING PROTEIN PRECIPITATION INTERNAL STANDARDS FOR clEF IMAGING clEF clEF-MASS SPECTROMETRY clEF IN MICROCHANNELS APPLICATIONS OF clEF A. Hemoglobins B. Protein Glycoforms C. Monoclonal Antibodies D. Peptides E. Affinity clEF F. clEF in Proteomics G. Other Applications REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

The practice of isoelectric focusing in the capillary format provides the high resolving power of conventional gel isoelectric focusing (IEF) and the automation capabilities of instrumental techniques such as capillary electrophoresis (CE)and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The principle of capillary isoelectric focusing (cIEF) is similar to 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

181

182

T. WEHR

that of gel IEF: proteins migrate within a stable pH gradient formed by carrier ampholytes under the influence of an electric field. Upon attainment of equilibrium, proteins become focused within the pH gradient at points where they have zero net charge, i.e., their isoelectric points (pI). Any diffusion of the focused protein away from its isoelectric zone will result in acquisition of charge, resulting in back migration to the zone. The use of a narrow-bore fused silica capillary as the separation chamber provides efficient dissipation of Joule heat, enabling the use of very high electric fields (typically several hundred to a thousand V/cm). This allows separations to be performed in free solution, without the requirement for a gel as an anticonvective medium. The application of high field strengths provides high resolution (typically 0.02pI units) and rapid analysis time. All steps in the analysis including introduction of sample and ampholytes, focusing, and protein detection can be performed automatically under instrument control, and the capillary can be reused for several hundred analyses. The ability to automate the IEF process and obtain quantitative information on resolved proteins is a driving force for replacement of gel IEF by cIEF, particularly in industrial settings. A major limitation of performing IEF in capillaries is the use of fixed-point optical detectors on most commercial CE systems. In this approach, a short section of the capillary serves as the "flow cell" for ontube detection. This is quite satisfactory for kinetic techniques such as capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), but in cIEF it requires a means of transporting focused protein zones through the detection point without loss of resolution. A variety of techniques have been developed for mobilizing focused proteins which can be used singly or in concert. The added complexity of the mobilization process has been an obstacle in achieving reproducible cIEF separations. This chapter will describe the considerations for successful performance of cIEE Several reviews of cIEF have been published, 1-5 so only recent applications and possible future developments will be discussed. A C E system configured for cIEF is illustrated in Figure 1. The separation is carried out in a fused silica capillary which is coated externally with polyimide to provide mechanical strength. A portion of this polymer coating is removed at the far end of the capillary to serve as the detection "window." Most commercial CE systems employ UV absorbance detectors, but laser-induced fluorescence detection is occasionally used in cIEE In many applications, the internal surface of the capillary is coated to suppress electro-osmotic flow (EOF). This phenomenon occurs when an electric field is applied to a capillary which is filled with an electrolyte and which possesses a fixed charge on the capillary wall. This causes flow of liquid toward the electrode with polarity opposite to that of the wall charge. In many CE applications, EOF is desirable since it can serve as a transport mechanism to carry all analytes to the detector. In most cIEF applications, EOF reduces

9

CAPILLARY ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

FIGURE

I

183

Schematic diagram of a CE system configured for clEF.

resolution and reproducibility, so wall-coated capillaries are often preferred for cIEE In a typical cIEF analysis, the capillary is first filled with a mixture of the sample and carrier ampholytes. This is accomplished by positioning a vial containing the mixture at the inlet side of the capillary with the capillary tip and high-voltage electrode immersed in the solution. The solution is forced into the capillary, typically by applying gas pressure to the head space above the sample vial or by applying vacuum to the outlet side of the capillary. Once the sample + ampholyte mixture is loaded into the capillary, the sample vial is replaced with the one containing anolyte (dilute acid), and a vial containing catholyte (dilute base) is positioned at the outlet end of the capillary. The second step in the cIEF process is application of high voltage to the capillary to initiate focusing. As focusing progresses, carrier ampholytes migrate to form a pH gradient and proteins migrate to their isoelectric points within the gradient. The final step in the cIEF process is mobilization of the capillary contents through the detector window. During this step, the detector signal is recorded to generate a profile of the focused proteins, similar to an HPLC chromatogram or the electropherogram obtained from a CZE experiment. Each of these steps in the cIEF process will be described in detail in the following discussion. II. SAMPLE PREPARATION Sample preparation for cIEF includes adjustment of sample ionic strength and protein concentration. These two parameters are the key to good performance in cIEE Excessive sample ionic strength can have two negative consequences in the IEF process. First, high salt or buffer concentrations can cause excessive Joule heat during the initial stages of focusing,

184

T.WEHR

which can increase the risk of protein denaturation and precipitation. Second, the high-mobility salt ions exit the capillary during focusing, to be replaced by anolyte protons at one end of the capillary and catholyte hydroxyl ions at the other. Therefore, the pH gradient formed by the carrier ampholytes will be compressed in proportion to the amount of salt in the sample. This compression of the pH gradient can compromise resolution and induce protein precipitation. Also, exposure of the terminal ends of the capillary to extremes of pH, particularly the cathodic end, can reduce the longevity of the capillary when wall-coated capillaries are used. The protein concentration of the sample can also affect the outcome of the clEF experiment. If protein concentration is too low, detection sensitivity will be compromised and if it is too high, the risk of protein precipitation is increased. Precipitation of proteins occurs because the solubility of proteins under isoelectric conditions is reduced and the protein concentration in the focused zone can be elevated as much as 200-fold relative to the protein concentration in the initial sample. A good rule of thumb is to adjust protein concentration to about 0.5 mg/mL and adjust sample ionic strength to 50 mM or lower. However, some proteins such as immunoglobulins, membrane proteins, and other large hydrophobic proteins are more prone to precipitation, and lower protein concentrations may be necessary for successful clEF analysis. Filtration or centrifugation of the sample to remove any particulates or protein aggregates is also a good practice. Off-line desalting techniques such as dialysis, ultrafiltration, or gel filtration are all satisfactory for preparing samples for clEE However, these techniques can be time consuming and laborious. Two on-line desalting techniques for clEF have been described. Liao and Zhang 6 used an ampholyte-replacement procedure for desalting. In this approach, an acidic ampholyte solution titrated to pH 4 was used as anolyte, and an alkaline ampholyte solution titrated to pH 11 was used as catholyte. During the desalting step, salts present in the protein sample were exchanged for the titrated ampholytes. Following desalting, the titrated ampholyte solutions were replaced with conventional anolyte and catholyte solutions and clEF was performed as usual. A limitation which affects reproducibility of this on-line desalting method is variation in the ampholyte distributions in the final pH gradients depending on the salt concentration of the sample. A simpler on-line technique using voltage ramping has been described by Clarke et al. 7 At the beginning of focusing, capillary voltage was increased from 0 to 10 kV over several minutes. During this period, salt ions exited the capillary under low-voltage conditions, which minimized generation of Joule heat. This method is limited by the need to optimize voltage ramping conditions for different salt concentrations. Moreover, the problems of gradient compression and exposure of the capillary to elevated pH are not resolved with this method.

9

CAPILb~,RY ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

185

III. AMPHOLYTE SELECTION AND SAMPLE INTRODUCTION The quality of the cIEF separation will depend upon the range and complexity of the carrier ampholyte mixture. For separation of proteins with a wide range of isoelectric points or to screen an unknown sample, a broad-range mixture of ampholytes is recommended, e.g., pH 3-10. For high resolution across a narrow pH range, a narrow-range ampholyte mixture can be used; there are several commercial sources for narrow-range mixtures that generate gradients spanning 1-3 pH units. However, narrowrange ampholyte preparations should be "doped" with a small amount (0.2-0.4% overall) of wide-range ampholytes to bridge the pH gap between the termini of the gradient and the anolyte and catholyte solutions. The resolving power of an ampholyte pH gradient will depend on the number of ampholyte species in the mixture, the greater the number of ampholytes, the smaller will be the pH variance between adjacent loci within the capillary. Two approaches to increasing local resolution in cIEF have been described. Hjert6n 8 proposed blending ampholyte mixtures from several suppliers to increase the number of ampholyte species. Righetti et al. 9 suggested adding specific zwitterionic species to the ampholyte blend to solve particular resolution problems. For example, Righetti et al. demonstrated that addition of/3-alanine to a pH 6-8 ampholyte mixture could resolve hemoglobins A and F, and a combination of/3-alanine and 6-aminocaproic acid added to the same ampholyte mixture could resolve hemoglobins A and Alc. When cIEF is performed in CE systems using on-tube detection, proteins which focus in the segment between the detection window and the capillary outlet may not be detected in some mobilization schemes. To confine the pH gradient within the "effective" length of the capillary (i.e., the length between the capillary inlet and the detection point), a spacer may be added to the sample + ampholyte mixture. A commonly used spacer for this purpose is N,N,N~N'-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED). l~ At the completion of focusing, the TEMED spacer occupies the end of the capillary distal to the inlet, and all proteins focused within the pH gradient are detected. The appropriate amount of spacer can be determined from the ampholyte concentration and the percentage of the detector-distal capillary distance relative to the total capillary length. For example, when using an ampholyte concentration of 2%, a 20cm capillary, and a 5 cm detection window from the capillary outlet, the appropriate TEMED concentration would be 5/20 • 2% or 0.5%. An unfortunate feature of commercial ampholytes is their high background absorbance in the low-UV region. These products were all developed for conventional gel IEF, where UV absorbance is not an issue, cIEF with on-tube detection requires monitoring at longer wavelengths where the ampholytes are transparent. For most applications, detection at 280 nm is satisfactory. Although protein absorbance at 280 nm is typically

186

1-.WEHR

50-100-fold lower than that in the low UV region, the high protein concentration in the focused zones compensates for this loss in signal. A novel solution to the problem of ampholyte background absorbance has been proposed by Huang et al. ~2These investigators performed cIEF in capillaries filled with pure water. The protons and hydroxyl ions formed by electrolysis of water at the high-voltage electrodes served to form a pH gradient within the capillary. However, the technique is limited by poor resolution and the tendency of proteins to precipitate in solutions of low ionic strength. In most cIEF methods, the sample is premixed with the ampholyte mixture (and spacer, if appropriate) and the sample + ampholyte mixture is introduced into the capillary by the application of pressure at the capillary inlet, by application of vacuum at the capillary outlet, or by hydrodynamic injection. In the latter approach, the vial containing the sample + ampholyte mixture is elevated relative to the outlet vial. In contrast to CZE, a significant fraction of the capillary can be loaded with the sample, and in many approaches, the entire capillary is filled with the sample + ampholyte mixture. The large injection volumes used in cIEF result in increased zone concentrations and allow cIEF to be considered for micropreparative applications. An alternative method for sample introduction in cIEF has been reported by Chen et al. 13 In their approach, the capillary was prefilled with carrier ampholytes, and the sample was introduced by electrokinetic injection. During injection, carrier ampholytes migrated to form a pH gradient, and analytes migrated to their isoelectric points within the gradient. The amount of sample loaded into the capillary was a function of the electric field strength and injection time. Enhancement of sample loading by 8-45-fold relative to the conventional cIEF sample introduction technique was demonstrated. A limitation of this dynamic sample introduction method is the injection bias of electrokinetic loading (analytes with low electrophoretic mobilities are injected with lower efficiencies than high-mobility analytes). IV. FOCUSING Once the capillary has been filled with the solution of carrier ampholytes, spacer, and proteins, focusing is initiated by application of high voltage. During this process, ampholytes and proteins are contained within the capillary using an acidic anolyte solution (typically 10-20mM phosphoric acid) and an alkaline catholytic solution (typically sodium hydroxide at twice the anolyte concentration, e.g., 20-40mM). It is recommended that the catholyte solution be fleshly prepared to minimize the uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The presence of carbonate salts in the catholyte can interfere with the focusing process. A typical

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

187

field strength for focusing is 600V/cm. Focusing is usually complete within a few minutes in short (15-20cm)capillaries. In the initial stages of focusing, high currents are typically observed as salts and buffer components in the sample migrate through the capillary. As the salts exit the capillary, and as ampholytes and proteins migrate to their isoelectric points, the capillary becomes depleted of current carriers and the observed current will drop exponentially. The attainment of equilibrium is evidenced by a drop in current to about 10% of the initial value and the rate of change of current approaches zero. This signals the completion of focusing, and continued application of high voltage can increase the risk of protein precipitation and loss of ampholytes. At the onset of focusing, nascent protein zones form at both margins of the capillary and, as the final pH gradient is established, the zones coalesce at the isoelectric point of the protein. During this process, the nascent zones forming at the detection end of the capillary migrate through the detection window during their transit to their equilibrium positions. This "focusing electropherogram" can be used to monitor focusing, and can serve as a useful diagnostic tool (e.g., to detect capillary degradation and changes in EOF). Under normal conditions, the focusing electropherogram is very reproducible. It can be used to obtain analytical information about the sample when only a quick profile is needed, 14 or in cases where extended exposure of the sample to high voltage causes precipitation.

V. MOBILIZATIONTECHNIQUES The final step in clEF, and the one that is unique to performing IEF in the capillary format, is mobilization of focused zones through the detection point. This requires application of a force to the capillary contents; this force can be electrophoretic, hydraulic (pressure, vacuum, or gravity), or electro-osmotic. It can be applied as a separate step following the completion of focusing (two-step cIEF) or applied during the focusing process (single-step cIEF). In all cases, high voltage is applied during mobilization to maintain zones in their focused state.

A. Two-step clEF Two-step cIEF is often the preferred approach since the focusing and mobilization conditions can be optimized independently.Two-step clEF has been performed using electrophoretic and hydraulic mobilization.

I. Electrophoretic Mobilization Electrophoretic mobilization has also been termed ion-addition mobilization or chemical mobilization. In all cases, it induces a shift in the charge state of the focused zones to cause them to move by electrophoretic

188

T. WEHR

force toward one end of the capillary or the other. This is accomplished by changing the chemical composition of the anolyte or catholyte solution. The principle of electrophoretic mobilization was described by Hjerten et al. ls,16 At equilibrium, the electroneutrality condition of the capillary can be expressed as C H+ -[- ~[~CNH ~- = C0H- + ~ CC0 0-

(1)

where CH§ , COH- , CNHJ-, and Cco o- represent the concentrations of protons, hydroxyl ~ons, and positive and negative groups on the ampholytes, respectively. To initiate electrophoretic mobilization toward the cathode, a non-hydroxyl anion, ym-, is added to the catholyte. This introduces another term on the right-hand side of the equation CH+ -]- ZCNH ~- -- C0 H- -~- Z C c 0 0- 71- Cym-

(2)

Migration of the non-hydroxyl anion into the capillary results in a decrease in hydroxyl concentration, i.e., a decrease in the pH. Progressive flow of non-hydroxyl anions into the capillary from the catholyte mobilizer solution causes a progressive pH shift down the capillary resulting in sequential migration of focused zones through the detection point. Mobilization of zones toward the anode can be accomplished by adding a non-proton cation, Y§ to the anolyte. In this case, entry of the non-proton cation into the capillary causes an increasing shift in pH to be propagated down the capillary. Because the majority of proteins have isoelectric points between 5 and 9, cathodic mobilization is most often used. The original approach for electrophoretic mobilization ~s employed addition of a neutral salt such as sodium chloride to the anolyte or catholyte solution. In this case, chloride served as the non-hydroxyl anion for cathodic mobilization, and sodium served as the non-proton cation for anodic mobilization. The conclusion of mobilization is signaled by an increase in current as the capillary becomes filled with the mobilizing salt (Figure 2A). Good correlation of mobilization time with pI values of the protein between 5 FIGURE 2 Current levels (in laA, right axis) during focusing and cathodic mobilization with sodium chloride (A) or zwitterion (B). Conditions: capillary, 17cm x 25 I~n (coated); focusing and mobilizing anolyte, 20mM HsPO4; focusing catholyte, 40 mM NaOH; mobilizing catholyte, 40 mM NaOH+ 80 mM NaCI (A) or zwitterion (B); polarity, positive to negative; focusing conditions, 15 kV for 240s; mobilizing voltage, 15 kV; capillary temperature, 20~ detection, 280 nm; sample, Bio-Rad IEF protein standard (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) diluted 1:24 in 2% Bio-Lyte 3-10 ampholytes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Solid trace, focusing and mobilization electropherogram; dotted trace, current in mA. Peak identification: I, cytochrome c; 2-4, lentil lectins; 5, contaminant; 6, human hemoglobin; 7, equine myoglobin; 8 human carbonic anhydrase; 9, bovine carbonic anhydrase; 10, ~lactoglobulin; II, phycocyanin. Reprinted from Reference I with permission from Academic Press.

9 CAPILLARYISOELECTRICFOCUSING

189 - li.O0

m A 100.0

3.7S

73.98

47.95-

t

jf

\ 21..-

m~

~f

f

,j

- 1.2S

\

-4.09 N:Ln.

I

-2.SO

/

!

0.00

1--_O. oo

6.00

24.00

18.oo

12. O0

30.00

- S.O0

75.9

l 55.83

- 3.TS

i

,It

} -2.50

3S.80 ,r

o

i

\

1S.77

(b)

/

-1.25

L\

-4.26NLn.

//

0.00

,

/

,

,

I

4.00

,

,

,

I

8.00

,,,

,

,l

12.00

,

,

,

I

16.00

,

,

,

- 0.00 20.00

190

T.WEHR

and 9 has been observed with electrophoretic mobilization 1 (Figure 3). In a refinement of electrophoretic mobilization, Zhu et al. ~7 employed a proprietary zwitterion in place of the neutral salt in the mobilizing solution. The zwitterion was chosen such that it became isoelectric between the anolyte and the anodic end of the pH gradient. This provided, in addition to electrophoretic mobilization, a displacement effect at the anodic end of the capillary, which improved mobilization efficiency for acidic proteins. Because the mobilizing species is a zwitterion, the increase in current at the conclusion of mobilization is modest (Figure 2B). A limitation of electrophoretic mobilization is the requirement for coated capillaries to eliminate EOE The presence of EOF prevents attainment of stable focused zones and results in peak broadening. Best results in reducing the level of EOF have been achieved using hydrophilic polymeric coatings covalently attached to the capillary wall. TM However, these coatings are often unstable under alkaline conditions. In cIEF using alkaline catholytes and mobilizing solutions, the cathodic end of the capillary is continuously exposed to alkaline environments and coating lifetime is compromised. Restricting the pH range to 3-8.5 can improve capillary lifetime, yet provide a cIEF system which is useful for the large majority of proteins. 2,3 2. Hydraulic Mobilization

Hydraulic mobilization can be accomplished by applying pressure to the head space above the capillary inlet, by applying vacuum to the

B

--Q.

In

7

0

D

2 4 6 8 mobilization time (minutes)

10

Isoelectric point vs. mobilization time using cathodic mobilization FIGURE 3 with sodium chloride (conditions as described in Figure I A). Reprinted from Reference I with permission from Academic Press.

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

191

capillary outlet, or by elevating the inlet of the capillary relative to the outlet of the capillary. The latter technique is referred to as gravity mobilization. In all forms of hydraulic mobilization, the mobilization force must be low enough to avoid peak broadening induced by laminar flow effects. (a) Pressure Mobilization: The first description of pressure mobilization was by Hj6rten and Zhu, is who used an HPLC pump with a flow splitter to displace anolyte into the capillary at a flow rate of 50nL/min. Commercial CE instruments generally employ compressed gas to pressurize the head space above the inlet vial to mobilize the capillary contents past the detection point. To prevent laminar flow peak broadening, the pressure should be regulated to no more than a few psi. (b) Vacuum Mobilization: Vacuum mobilization was described by Chen and Wiktorowicz. 19 They used a four-step vacuum-loading procedure to introduce sequentially segments of catholyte (20mM NaOH + 0.4% methylcellulose), ampholytes + methylcellulose, sample, and a final segment of ampholytes + methylcellulose from the anodic end of the capillary. Following loading, focusing was performed for 6 min at a field strength of 400 V/cm. At the completion of focusing, zones were mobilized toward the cathode by applying vacuum at the capillary outlet while high voltage was maintained across the capillary. (c) Gravity Mobilization: Focused zones can be mobilized through the detection point by raising the height of the capillary inlet relative to that of the capillary outlet. A simpler approach is to adjust the fluid level in the outlet vial. During focusing, anolyte and catholyte reservoirs contain the same volume of fluid. When focusing is complete, a second catholyte reservoir with only sufficient fluid to immerse the capillary outlet and electrode is brought into position on the outlet side (Figure 4). In either approach, the mobilization velocity can be modulated by changing the diameter of the capillary or by adding viscosity-modifying polymers to the ampholyte solution. B. Single-Step clEF

Conceptually, single-step cIEF would appear to be the simplest and most convenient approach to cIEF, since focusing and mobilization are performed as a single operation. This obviates the need for vial manipulation and separate mobilization reagents. Operationally, single-step cIEF can be difficult since it requires that the focusing reach steady state before the pH gradient reaches the detection point. The mobilization force used for single-step cIEF can be hydraulic or EOE I. Single-step clEF with EOF Mobilization

This technique was used to circumvent the problems in performing cIEF in coated capillaries. EOF-driven single-step cIEF was first investigated

192

T.WEHR

0.2

6,7

0.18

I

0.16

l

014 ~

I

s~,,.glob~ c

1 |

1

I I

6 hemoglobin A

/ l

I I

I I

anhydrase

o.12 T

I

o.1 /

I

2

J

8~m .,bo.lc 9 ~ v . carbonic

l

3

[

0.06

7-myoglobtn

I

I

|

~

1-cytochrorne C /,3,4Jen~ll lectlns

I

~,hyd,,,

II 4

5

L

fOqactoglobulin B

8

0.04 0.02

0

-0.02

0

S

10

15 Time (minutes]

2O

25

30

F I G U R E 4 Capillary IEF of standard proteins using gravity mobilization. The sample was diluted 49:1 with 2% ampholytes 3-10 containing 0.05%TEMED as a spacer. Proteins were focused for 4 min at 15 kV using a 75 lim • 30 cm coated capillary. A height difference of about 2 cm was applied while maintaining high voltage.The capillary and all solutions were thermostated at 20~ Reprinted from Reference 2 with permission from CRC Press.

by Mazzeo and Krull. 2~ In their approach, the entire capillary was filled with sample + ampholyte. Initial work employed uncoated capillaries, TEMED as a spacer, and the inclusion of methyl cellulose to modulate EOF. A limitation of this approach was the reduction in EOF as the basic segment of the pH gradient exited the capillary. This reduced the mobilization efficiency of acidic proteins late in the analysis. The use of a commercial C scoated capillary reduced the pH-dependent variation of EOF, and improved mobilization of acidic proteins. However, the authors recommended the use of multiple internal standards for accurate determination of pI with this method. An alternative approach to EOF-driven single-step cIEF was described by Thormann et al. 22 In this method, a 75pm i.d.• uncoated capillary was prefilled with catholyte (20mM NaOH + 0.06% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC)). A 5 cm segment of sample + ampholytes was injected at the inlet (anode) end of the capillary by gravity, then the inlet was immersed in anolyte (10mM H3PO4). A field strength of 220 V/cm was applied to the capillary, and focusing occurred as the sample + ampholyte segment was transported toward the cathode by EOE The HPMC served to coat dynamically the capillary wall to

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

193

reduce protein adsorption on the silica surface and to modulate EOE Successful performance of cIEF using this approach required careful optimization of capillary preconditioning, HPMC concentration, ampholyte concentration, and sample load to modulate the EOF level so that focusing was complete before the pH gradient reached the detection point. Whynot et al. 23 eliminated some of the problems of EOF-driven mobilization by using anionic-coated capillaries. These were prepared by copolymerization of acrylamide and sodium-2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate. The strong acidic function of the coating generated EOF, which was pH-independent in the range 3-9. Separations were rapid and required only a water rinse between injections. However, mobilization efficiency of acidic proteins was still problematic. In a more recent study, Kil~ir et al. 24 performed single-step cIEF by injecting sample and ampholytes as separate segments into the capillary, with the sample bracketed by two ampholyte zones. This approach minimized sample-ampholyte interaction, and permitted different ampholyte compositions to be used in the leading and following segments. The method compared favorably with non-segmented cIEF in terms of resolution and reproducibility. 2. Single-step clEF with Hydraulic Mobilization

The gravity mobilization technique described above for two-step cIEF can also be used for single-step cIEE 2 To accomplish this, the capillary is prefilled with catholyte (NaOH) or spacer (TEMED), and the sample + ampholyte mixture is injected at low pressure to occupy a proximal segment of the capillary. Following injection, the outlet vial is replaced with one containing a small volume of catholyte and high voltage is applied to the capillary. The siphoning induced by differences in the anolyte and catholyte volumes is used to mobilize the sample + ampholyte mixture toward the detection point. Successful use of this technique requires optimization of the mobilization force to achieve focusing prior to arrival of the pH gradient at the detection point. Use of coated capillaries is necessary to eliminate EOE The results of single-step gravity cIEF compare well with those obtained with two-step gravity cIEF (cf. Figures 4 and 5). Single-step cIEF can also be performed using pressure or vacuum, although the gravity method is desirable because of its simplicity. A limitation of single-step cIEF with partial filling of the capillary with the sample is reduction in sensitivity compared with completely filled capillary methods. VI. CAPILLARY SELECTION

Capillary selection for clEF depends on the mobilization technique used. For two-step cIEF using electrophoretic or hydraulic mobilization,

194

T. WEHR

0.1 6.7

0.08

0.06

:3

0.04 3

4

0.02

-0.02

0

t 5

I 10

I I 15 20 Time (minutes)

t 25

t 30

I 35

F I G U R E 5 Capillary IEF of standard proteins using single-step gravity clEF. Conditions similar to Figure 4, except that the sample occupied only a section of the capillary and the applied force was present from the beginning of the analysis. Note the absence of focusing peaks which appear between 0 and 5 min in Figure 4. Reprinted from Reference 2 with permission from CRC Press.

capillaries with internal coatings to suppress EOF and protein adsorption are preferred. Both adsorbed coatings and coatings covalently attached to the capillary wall 1 have been used for cIEE The disadvantage of adsorbed coatings is the necessity of adding a small amount of the coating polymer to the ampholyte mixture to prevent coating bleed with time. There are a variety of commercially available covalently coated capillaries, 2,25 but the most successful for cIEF are neutral hydrophilic polymeric coatings (such as linear polyacrylamide). When performing cIEF in the absence of EOF, short capillaries (e.g., 10-20cm) can be used, although the reduced sample volume will limit zone concentration at the completion of focusing, which reduces sensitivity. Large internal diameters (_>50~tm) are preferred to increase sensitivity with on-tube detection and to reduce the risk of plugging. Large-diameter capillaries are undesirable in many CE applications due to increased Joule heat, but since current drops rapidly in cIEF, this is rarely a problem in cIEE In single-step cIEF, capillary length is important to ensure that zones are completely focused upon reaching the detection point.

9

CAPILLARY ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

195

VII. MINIMIZING PROTEIN PRECIPITATION Protein precipitation, which is often a vexation in gel IEF, can be a disaster in cIEE Protein precipitation and aggregation can generate particles that appear as artifactual spikes in the electropherogram. Precipitates may partially block the capillary, cause reduced or fluctuating current, and produce variable migration times. In worse cases, current drops to zero and the analysis fails. Precipitation is favored by the high protein concentration in the zones, the isoelectric state of the proteins at equilibrium, and the removal of salt in the focusing process. Large proteins such as immunoglobulins and hydrophobic species such as membrane proteins are at high risk for aggregation in cIEE This risk can be minimized by adding non-ionic surfactants (reduced Triton X-100, Brij, and Tween), chaotropic agents (urea), or organic modifiers (glycerol or propylene glycol) to the ampholyte solution. 1~ Conti et al. 26 demonstrated that protein solubility in cIEF could be improved with the addition of high concentrations of polyols (20-40% sucrose, sorbose, and sorbitol) in combination with high concentrations of zwitterions (200mM taurine, 500mM non-detergent sulfobetaines, 1 M bicine or CAPS (3-cyclohexylamino-l-propanesulfonic acid)). A problematical glycopeptide antibiotic sample was successfully analyzed using the addition of 6 M urea + 10% trifluoroalcohol. VIII. INTERNAL STANDARDS FOR clEF Calibration of the pH gradient in conventional gel IEF is accomplished by running protein standards alongside the analyte. Because of the large number of variables that must be controlled in cIEF, there is sufficient variability in migration times from run to run, that external standard calibration is unsatisfactory. Instead, internal standards must be used. Proteins are poor choices for internal standards in cIEF because of their instability and the presence of impurities, variants, and isoforms. Several alternative approaches for internal standardization of cIEF have been reported. Kobayashi et al. 27 prepared dansyl derivatives of peptides and ampholytes for use as internal standards, and used these to characterize ampholytes from several commercial suppliers. Shimura et al. 28 used a set of 16 tri- to hexapeptides, each containing one tryptophan residue, for internal calibration of cIEF pH gradients. These covered a pH range from 3.38 to 10.17, with gaps of less than 1.2 pH units. In a later report, the same authors prepared fluorescent derivatives of a family of 19 peptides from 4 to 13 residues in length for use as pI markers with LIF detection. 29 These carried a tetramethylrhodamine tag attached to cysteinyl residues and covered a pI range from 3.64 to 10.12. ~lais and Freidl 3~synthesized a family of substituted aminomethylphenols that have been used successfully for internal standarization in cIEE These are highly water-soluble, absorb

196

T.WEHR

strongly at 280nm, and cover a pH range 5.3-10.4. Recently, the same group has developed a series of fluorescent pI markers for use with laserinduced fluorescence detection in cIEE 31 The markers are water-soluble derivatives of fluorescein containing phenolic and aliphatic amino groups. Four markers were described with pI values equal to 5.4, 5.7, 6.0, and 6.6. IX. IMAGING clEF

The mobilization process required for clEF with conventional CE instruments with single-point on-tube detection has several limitations. Analysis time is increased using a separate mobilization stage (two-step clEF) or using a reduced mobilization rate to allow complete focusing (single-step clEF). Resolution may be compromised, particularly for proteins at the late-migrating terminus of the pH gradient. In EOF-driven mobilization, variations in mobilization velocity can compromise resolution and reproducibility. In hydraulic mobilization, laminar-flow band broadening can reduce resolution. Imaging cIEF is a novel approach that eliminates the mobilization step. It was developed by Pawliszyn eta]. 32,33 and a commercial imaging clEF instrument has recently been introduced by Convergent Bioscience, Ltd. (Toronto, Ontario). 34,35 The system consists of a short (5 cm) capillary with the protective outer polyimide cladding removed, and the internal capillary coated with a hydrophilic polymer (Figure 6). Each end of

[ MICROINJECTOR ]

I HIGH I VOLTAG IEI /

A]

l , CAMERAUl / / ~ ANOLYTE[H+]~ "-'---] ~ / / / OUTLET~ ' ~ ~ ~1r s

HVELECTRODE[-] CATHOLYTE [OH-, cleFCARTRIDGE INLET CAPILLARY

.,

?/

i r cool-J/ /

/

r'RB-ERO;T/CS[1 I PRESSFITCONNEOTORJ/ / BUNDLE L~TRANSFER CAPILLARY.-----J (0.010"ID) [~.~.--- WASTE~ /

~PRESSURELINE

" ' ~

SAMPLE BALANCEVIAL RINSEVIAL

DEUTERIUM . ~-...""...z"// LAMP ~ ~)., - u /

FIGURE 6 Block diagram of imaging CE system. Reprinted with permission from International Scientific Communications, Inc., and Convergent BioScience, Ltd.

9

CAPILLARY ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

197

the capillary is attached to sections of hollow-fiber dialysis tubing contained in the electrolyte reservoirs. These tubing segments serve to isolate the capillary contents from the electrolyte reservoirs but allow free passage of anolyte and catholyte ions.The sample contained in the sample loop of an eight-port injection valve is introduced into the capillary by an infusion pump. Injection can be performed manually or by using an autosampler. Following injection, high voltage is applied to initiate focusing. Detection is accomplished by illuminating the entire capillary with light from a xenon lamp delivered using a fiber optic system. Transmitted light from the entire capillary length is imaged onto a CCD detector. The focusing process can be monitored in real time for the development and optimization of the method, and the final zone profile at the completion of focusing can be captured for analytical purposes. Precipitation problems can be recognized by real-time monitoring, and the conventional solutions applied (addition of surfactants, chaotropes, organic modifiers, etc.). One advantage of imaging clEF is that all segments of the pH gradient are focused for the same period, in contrast to conventional clEF in which late-migrating proteins are focused for longer periods and are at greater risk for precipitation. The commercial imaging clEF system can be equipped with an optional on-line desalting system for samples containing up to 150mM salt. Imaging clEF has recently been used to characterize glycoforms of recombinant human necrosis factor receptor FC fusion protein. 36 X. clEF-MASS SPECTROMETRY

On-line coupling of cIEF to mass spectrometry (MS) has generated interest in the growing field of proteomics because it shares some separation characteristics with 2-D gel electrophoresis (2-DE), a core technology in proteomics studies. In expression proteomics experiments, differences in the expression levels of cellular proteins in response to metabolic changes are used to identify proteins associated with disease progression, and to elucidate targets for therapeutic intervention. Such studies require the ability to detect quantitative changes in low-abundance proteins against a background of the thousands of proteins within a cell or tissue. To separate mixtures of such extraordinary complexity, a two-dimensional (2-D) separation technique is necessary. The ideal 2-D technique should have different selectivities in each dimension so that the total resolution of the technique is the product of the band capacity of the two dimensions. 2-DE fulfills this requirement since the first dimension (IEF) is based on charge (isoelectric point) while the second dimension (SDS-PAGE) is based on mass. Thus, the two dimensions are orthogonal in selectivity and 2-DE can resolve over 2000 proteins in a single gel. Unfortunately, 2-DE is time consuming, laborious, and only

198

v.WEHR semi-quantitative. The coupling of clEF to MS promised to provide the desired combination of orthogonal separation selectivities with automated analysis and short run times. The technique has been previously reviewed 37 and recent developments will be described here. Successful coupling of clEF with electrospray MS requires a means of performing focusing and mobilization with the capillary outlet interfaced with the ESI system. It also requires a means of preventing entry of the carrier ampholytes into the ionization system, since they can suppress analyte signal and foul the mass spectrometer. Initial attempts employed two-step clEF with the catholyte reservoir placed in the ionization source during focusing. 38 Upon completion of focusing, the reservoir was removed and mobilization was initiated by infusion of a coaxial water methanol acetic acid sheath liquid. It was observed that the presence of ampholytes reduced protein net charge and ion intensities. In a later modification of this approach, gravity-assisted mobilization was used to compensate for moving-boundary effects caused by electromigration of sheath liquid ions into the capillary. 39 This clEF-MS interface was coupled to a triple quadrupole MS for the analysis of transferrin glycoforms, 39 recombinant fusion proteins expressed in Escherichia coli 4~ and phosphorylated albumins. 4~ The same interface was coupled to a timeof-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer for analysis of model proteins. 42 Clarke and Naylor 43 described a two-step clEF system in which only the composition of the sheath liquid was changed to effect mobilization. During focusing, the sheath liquid was methanolic ammonium hydroxide delivered at a reduced flow rate. This enabled formation of a static "hanging drop" of catholyte at the end of the separation capillary. At the completion of focusing, the sheath liquid was changed to anolyte (methanolic acetic acid) delivered at a higher flow rate to initiate electrophoretic mobilization into the ESI source of a double-sector mass spectrometer. Problems encountered with replacement of the catholyte reservoir after focusing and with introduction of ampholytes into the mass spectrometer were solved by the use of microdialysis systems to remove ampholytes. Lamoree et al. 44 devised an on-line microdialysis (MD) system between the separation capillary and a transfer capillary connected to an ESI-quadrupole MS. The MD system consisted of hollow fiber dialysis tubing sealed in a chamber infused with acetic acid, which served as the catholyte. After focusing, contents of the separation capillary were mobilized through the MD using pressure, and ampholytes were removed by dialysis across the MD tubing. An acetic acid sheath liquid provided electrical contact for the ESI source. A later modification of this system replaced the hollow fiber dialysis tubing with a flat dialysis membrane. 4s The same group has also employed a free-flow electrophoresis (FFE) device to remove ampholytes prior to introduction of separated proteins into the E S I - M S . 46 In this device, an acetic acid carrier solution (which

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

199

also served as the catholyte) was introduced into the FFE cell. A transverse electric field applied to the FFE cell caused a reduction in concentration of ampholytes by their differential deflection from the outlet of the cell. Focusing and mobilization were accomplished simultaneously by applying pressure at the capillary inlet in conjunction with a counterbalancing pressure supplied by the FFE carrier. A cIEF-MS system employing a hollow fiber microdialysis system and pressure mobilization was described by Yang et al. 47 In this system, anodic mobilization was used, and the microdialysis liquid (10% acetic acid) served as the anolyte and a proton source for ionization. The extraordinarily high resolution and mass accuracy of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance MS (FTICR-MS) have made it a highly desirable technique in proteomic studies, since it enables unambiguous determination of protein mass and charge from a single charge state. Coupling of cIEF with FTICR-MS has been accomplished using the same approach described above for cIEF-quadrupole MS using two-step cIEE 48'49 Focusing was carried out with a conventional setup using anolyte and catholyte reservoirs. After the focusing step, the capillary was inserted into the ESI source and focused zones mobilized by pressure in conjunction with water:acetic acid:methanol sheath flow. This approach has been used to identify carbonic anhydrase in a cell lysate in the presence of a 100-fold excess of hemoglobin 48 and to resolve - 9 0 0 proteins from the 3-60 kDa fraction of the E. coli proteome. 49 In the latter study, sensitivity and mass accuracy in the FTICR-MS analysis were improved by culturing cells in media depleted of the rare isotopes 13C, lSN, and 2H.

XI. clEF IN MICROCHANNELS

Chip-based microanalysis devices are gaining widespread attention for their promise in miniaturizing analytical instruments and providing platforms for high-throughput clinical diagnostics and rapid screening in drug discovery environments. A common format for these devices is the use of microchannel systems with electrically driven fluid transport. Several investigators have evaluated IEF in microchannel devices because it provides both high resolution and good sensitivity due to the high protein concentration of focused zones. IEF in microchannels was employed by Hofmann et al. s~ as a detection method for fluorescent peptides used as probes in a multiplex diagnostic assay system. Single-step cIEF with EOF mobilization was used because of its compatibility with the chip format. The microchannel device consisted of a 200 ~m x 10 ~tm channel of 7 cm length etched in planar glass. The Cy-5 labeled peptides were detected by laser-induced fluorescence.

200

T.WEHR

Rossier et al. sl reported preliminary results using isoelectric focusing in channels prepared by photoablation of polymer substrates. The prototype device consisted of a microchannel filled with a 6 % T, 4 % C polyacrylamide gel, and containing a blend of pK a 4.6 and 6.2 ampholytes. The authors demonstrated entrapment of selected proteins in the microchannel by an isoelectric sieving mechanism. Tan et al. s2 described isoelectric focusing of proteins in a plastic microfluidic device containing a 50~tm x 120pm channel connected to four reservoirs (of which three were used for IEF experiments). The three reservoirs contained anolyte, catholyte, and mobilizer, respectively. Detection was by laser-induced fluorescence. Two-step IEF was performed using electrophoretic mobilization. Mobilization was accomplished by switching high voltage from the catholyte electrode to the mobilizer electrode. This obviated the need for physical movement of vials to initiate mobilization, as is done in conventional clEF methods. The separation distance could be shortened from 4.7 to 1.2 cm by changing reservoir assignments. This enabled analysis times to be reduced to 150 s with no loss in resolution. The system was applied to the separation of fluorescent protein-protein complexes. Tsai et al. s3 performed IEF in a microchannel cut into the surface of borosilicate glass. The interior of the channel was coated with a hydrophobic hexamethyldisilazine plasma-polymerized film to reduce protein adsorption and EOE Focusing of colored model proteins was monitored by whole-capillary imaging with a digital camera. An acrylic microfluidic device, which sequentially coupled IEF with CZE, has been developed by Herr et al. s4 In this 2-D separation system, analytes were focused in an IEF microchannel containing ampholytes which was bounded by catholyte and ampholyte solutions. Focused bands were mobilized by EOF towards the cathode. At intervals, segments of the IEF separation were electrokinetically sampled into an orthogonal intersecting channel and resolved by CZE. In the second dimension, ampholytes were no longer bounded by pH extremes, and became defocused to serve as the CZE buffer. Detection was accomplished by CCD imaging of fluorescent proteins (FITC-labeled ovalbumin, green fluorescent protein). The peak capacity of the 2-D system was estimated to be about 1300.

Xll. APPLICATIONS OF clEF

There is an extensive literature on the application of cIEF to particular analytical problems, and it is beyond the scope of this chapter to provide an exhaustive review. Instead, this section is intended to present an overview of the major applications of clEF with a focus on more recent developments.

9

201

CAPILLARY ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

A. Hemoglobins The hemoglobin molecule is very hydrophilic and exists at high concentrations in erythrocytes. It is quite soluble under isoelectric conditions in focused zones and therefore behaves well in clEF. As a consequence, hemoglobins are often used as model proteins to develop and optimize clEF methods.l~ host of hemoglobin variants exists in the human population. These include variants associated with different life stages (e.g., fetal hemoglobin), genetic variants including point mutations and deletions, and glycosylated hemoglobins. Many of these variants are associated with blood disorders. Since the structural changes in variant hemoglobins often produce slight changes in protein isoelectric points, clEF has been evaluated by several investigators for clinical diagnosis of hemoglobin-based blood diseases. Deletions in globin genes give rise to a-thalassemias, in which altered globin chain production produces variant hemoglobins which can be identified by clEF.s6 clEF has been used to detect variants associated with other hemoglobinopathies such as hemoglobins E, D, and S (Figure 7). 57-64 Hemoglobin Alc, a glycated

$I 71.25

47.50

23.75

1

0

.

.

.

I

.

2

,

,

I

4

min

.

,

,

I_

6

'

'

'

t

8

F I G U R E 7 Separation of hemoglobin variants by clEF in a 12 cm x 25 I~m coated capillary usig pH 3-10 ampholytes. Focusing and mobilization were carried out at constant voltages of 8kV. Reprinted from Reference 10 with permission from Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

202

1.WEHR

form associated with human diabetes, has also been analyzed by cIEE 65,66 cIEF has used to characterize the binding of hemoglobin to haptoglobin, 67 a serum glycoprotein which has a strong affinity for the a-globin chain. B. Protein Glycoforms

Many proteins exist as isoforms in which oligosaccharide groups are attached to one or multiple sites on the primary sequence. Glycoforms can vary in the number of glycosylation sites occupied, and in the structure of the oligosaccharide at a particular site. The saccharide component of a glycoprotein can play a role in protein solubility, stability, and function; an understanding of protein glycosylation is therefore important in the development and manufacture of protein therapeutics. The presence of oligosaccharide groups can cause shifts of protein isoelectric points, so cIEF is an obvious tool for studying protein glycoforms, cIEF has been used to characterize glycoforms of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, 68-71 erythropoietin, 72,73 recombinant human tissue necrosis factor receptor: FC fusion protein, 36 transferrins, 74-76 conalbumin, 75,77 metallothioneins, 75 and HIV envelope glycoproteins. 78 Techniques for separation of glycoproteins by cIEF are reviewed by Krull et al. 79 C. Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies, which are widely used as diagnostic and therapeutic tools, often exhibit microheterogeneity. These species arise from post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, or from alterations such as deamidation, clipping, and oxidation during purification, formulation and storage, cIEF is increasingly used to detect such microheterogeneity. Examples include monitoring production of recombinant antithrombin III, 8~ quality control of humanized monoclonal HER2, 81 analysis of proteolysis fragments of humanized murine monoclonal antibodies, 82 characterization of monoclonal antibody isoforms, 83 and detection of charge heterogeneity in Mab C2B8 (a chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody directed to the human CD20 antigen). 84 D. Peptides

Analysis of peptides by gel IEF is problematical because of their high diffusion rates, which causes loss of resolution when high voltage is turned off at the completion of focusing. Also, peptides have poor staining affinity. Although neither of these problems are relevant in cIEF, detection by on-tube UV detection is hampered by the high background absorbance of carrier ampholytes at the short wavelengths typically used for peptides. This necessitates detection at wavelengths of 280nm or

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

203

greater; therefore, only peptides with aromatic residues will be detected. Nonetheless, the high concentration factors in cIEF compensate for the reduced signal at higher wavelengths, and the high peak capacities (500-1000) have enabled cIEF to be used for separation of complex peptide mixtures, cIEF with UV detection has been applied to the separation of tryptic digests of model proteins 8s-87 and yeast cytosolic proteins. 88 Mao and Zhang 89 used cIEF with laser-induced fluorescence to analyze BSA trypic peptides labeled with FITC or BODIPY. Cruikshank et al. 9~ devised a detection scheme for nucleic acid hybridization probes using cIEE Oligonucleotide probes were coupled via disulfide bonds to fluorescently tagged signal peptides. Following hybridization, the peptide tags were released with cysteine and separated by cIEE A family of signal peptides, each with a distinct pI value, was used in a multiple-probe cIEF-LIF detection system. E. Affinity clEF

cIEF has occasionally been used to study bioaffinity interactions such as ligand-receptor binding. Okun 91 used cIEF to study the binding of actinavidin to biotin and to biotinylated oligonucleotides. It was observed that binding of the affinity ligand reduced the number of protein isoforms, and that the affinity complex exhibited a reduced pI. Righetti et al. 67 investigated the binding of haptoglobin to hemoglobin by cIEE In this study, binding stoichiometry was determined by introducing haptoglobin into prefocused hemoglobin zones and detecting the acidic complexes as they migrated out of the pH gradient. Lyubarskaya et al. 92 used cIEF-ion trap MS to determine affinity binding of tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides with the s r c SH2 domain, a non-catalytic region of a variety cellular proteins with tyrosine kinase activity. The concentrating power of the cIEF step provided increased sensitivity, while the MS ~ capabilities of the ion trap MS provided structural information for ligand identification. F. clEF in Proteomics

As discussed earlier, the enormous complexity of protein extracts from cells and tissues presents a formidable challenge in protein identification and quantitation in proteomic studies. With a resolving power better than 0.01 pI and a concentrating power better than 500-fold, cIEF may represent the most powerful single-dimension separation technique for proteins. 93 The application of cIEF in proteomics has been the subject of several reviews. 5,93-96 The high resolution attainable with clEF alone makes it suitable for separation of protein mixtures of moderate complexity. For example,

204

T.WEHR

Manabe et al. were able to separate about 60 proteins in human plasma using two-step cIEF with electrophoretic mobilization. 97,98 However, for the samples commonly encountered in proteomics studies, a singledimension separation technique is inadequate, and multidimensional approaches are more widely used. This can be done off-line, and cIEF has been used as the second-dimension separation after capillary reversed-phase chromatography. 89 However, on-line multidimensional approaches are preferred for considerations of throughput and automation. Liquid-phase separations such as cIEF are easily coupled to electrospray ionization interfaces, so cIEF-ESI-MS has been explored as an on-line 2-D analytical system for proteomics. Jensen et al. 99 w e r e able to resolve 400-1000 proteins in the mass range 2-100 kDa in cell lysates of E. coli and Deinococcus radiodurans using cIEF coupled on-line with FTICR-MS. Shen et al. 88demonstrated cIEF separation of the peptides in a tryptic digest of yeast cytosol proteins; resolution of ~0.005 pI units produced an estimated peak capacity o f - 1 0 0 0 . A novel 2-D capillary separation system coupling cIEF with transient isotachophoresis (ITP) and CZE was developed by Mohan and Lee.87 The two separation modes were joined by a microdialysis device containing acetic acid, which served as the anolyte for the first-dimension cIEF separation and the background electrolyte for the second-dimension ITP/CZE separation. Following focusing in the cIEF dimension, segments of the pH gradient were hydrodynamically injected into the ITP/CZE capillary by gravity. The carrier ampholytes served as the leading electrolyte and acetic acid as the terminating electrolyte for transient ITP. Since the bulk of the carrier ampholyte population migrated ahead of the analytes, detection in the low-UV region was possible. The authors demonstrated a 2-D separation of tryptic peptides obtained from a threecomponent protein mixture. The two separation modes are largely orthogonal in separation mechanism, and the peak capacity of---1600 was estimated for the 2-D peptide separation. Sheng and Pawliszyn 86 have used the imaging cIEF system described above as the second dimension in a 2-D system. CZE was used as the first dimension for separation of model proteins, and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) was used as the first dimension for separation of tryptic peptides. In both cases, EOF was used to transport the electrolyte from the first-dimension capillary. A ten-port valve carrying two hollow-fiber dialysis loops served as the interface between the two separation systems. The dialysis loops functioned to remove electrolytes and detergents from the first-dimension eluent, and to introduce carrier ampholytes and urea for the second-dimension separation. An additional eight-port valve was used to flush the contents of the imaging cIEF system between duty cycles. Alternating capture of first-dimension eluent in one loop and second-dimension analysis of the contents of the other loop permitted continuous on-line sample analysis. An advantage of using

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

205

imaging clEF in the second dimension is that diffusional band broadening in the interface was eliminated by the focusing power of cIEE The distribution of peptide "spots" across the entire surface of a 2-D presentation of the MEKC-cIEF data demonstrated the orthogonality of the two separation systems.

G. Other Applications clEF has been used for a number of novel applications. These include separation and detection of protein complexes, a~176176 separation of microorganisms, 1~176 and analysis of organic selenium complexes by cIEF-ICP-MS. TM

REFERENCES 1. Wehr, T., Zhu, M. and Rodriguez-Diaz, R. Capillary isoelectric focusing. In Methods in Enzymology Vol. 270 (Karger, B. L. and Hancock, W. S. Eds.) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 358-374, 1996. 2. Rodriguez-Diaz, R., Wehr, T., Zhu, M. and Levi, V. Capillary isoelectric focusing. In Handbook of Capillary Electrophoresis, 2nd Ed. (Landers, J. Ed.) CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 101-153, 1996. 3. Wehr, T., Rodriguez-Diaz, R. and Zhu, M. Capillary isoelectric focusing. In Capillary Electrophoresis of Proteins, J. Chromatogr. Library, Vol. 80, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 131-233, 1998. 4. Wehr, T., Rodriguez-Diaz, R. and Zhu, M. Recent advances in capillary isoelectric focusing. In CE in Biotechnology" Practical Applications for Protein and Peptide Analysis (Altria, K. D.Ed.) Chromatographia CE Series, Vol. 53, Vieweg Publishing, Weisbaden, pp. 45-58, 2001. 5. Shimura, K. Recent advances in capillary isoelectric focusing: 1997-2002. Electrophoresis 2002 23:3847-3857, 2002. 6. Liao, J. L. and Zhang, R. Simple approach to eliminating disturbances in isoelectric focusing caused by the presence of salts. J. Chromatogr. 684:143-148, 1994. 7. Clarke, N. J., Tomlinson, A. J., Schomberg, G. and Naylor, S. Capillary isoelectric focusing of physiologically derived proteins with on-line desalting of isotonic salt concentrations. Anal. Chem. 69:2786-2792, 1997. 8. Hjert6n, S. Isoelectric focusing in capillaries. In Capillary Electrophoresis- Theory and Practice (Grossman, E D. and Colburn, J. C. Eds.) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 191-214, 1992. 9. Righetti, P. G., Bossi, A. and Gelfi, C. Capillary isoelectric focusing and isoelectric buffers: an evolving scenario. J. Capillary Electrophoresis 4:47-59, 1997. 10. Zhu, M., Rodriguez, R. and Wehr, T. Optimizing separation parameters in capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 559:479-488, 1991. 11. Mohan, D. and Lee, C. S. Extension of separation range in capillary isoelectric focusing for resolving highly basic biomolecules. J. Chromatogr. A 979:271-276, 2002. 12. Huang, T., Wu, X.-Z. and Pawliszyn, J. Capillary isoelectric focusing without carrier ampholytes. Anal. Chem. 72:4758-4761, 2000. 13. Chen, J., Gao, J. and Lee, C. S. Dynamic enhancements of sample loading and analyte concentration in capillary isoelectric focusing for proteome studies. J. Proteome Res. 2:249-254, 2003.

206

T.WEHR

14. Kilar, E and Hjert6n, S. Fast and high resolution analysis of human serum transferrin by high performance isoelectric focusing in capillaries. Electrophoresis 10:23-29, 1989. 15. Hjert~n, S. and Zhu, M. Adaptation of the equipment for high-performance electrophoresis to isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 346:265-270, 1985. 16. Hjert~n, S., Liao, J.-L. and Yao, K. Theoretical and experimental study of highperformance electrophoretic mobilization of isoelectrically focused protein zones. J. Chromatogr. 387:127-138, 1987. 17. Zhu, M., Rodriguez, R. and Wehr, T. Optimizing separation parameters in capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 559:479-488, 1991. 18. Hjert6n, S. High-performance electrophoresis. Elimination of electroendosmosis and solute adsorption. J. Chromatogr. 347:191-198, 1985. 19. Chen, S.-M. and Wiktorowicz, J. E. Isoelectric focusing by free solution capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 206:84-90, 1992. 20. Mazzeo, J. R. and Krull, I. S. Capillary isoelectric focusing of proteins in uncoated fused-silica capillaries using polymeric additives. Anal. Chem. 63:2852-2857, 1991. 21. Mazzeo, J. R. and Krull, I. S. Coated capillaries and additives for the separation of proteins by capillary zone electrophoresis and capillary isoelectric focusing. Biotechniques 10:638-645, 1991. 22. Thormann, W., Caslavska, J., Molteni, S. and Chmelik, J. Capillary isoelectric focusing with electroosmotic zone displacement and on-column multichannel detection. J. Chromatogr. 589:321-327, 1992. 23. Whynot, D. M., Hartwick, R. A. and Bane, S. Capillary isoelectric focusing with anionic coated capillaries. J. Chromatogr. 767:231-239, 1997. 24. Kilfir, E, V~gv~iri, ft.. and M6d, A. New set-up for capillary isoelectric focusing in uncoated capillaries. J. Chromatogr. 813:349-360, 1998. 25. Wehr, T. Recent advances in capillary electrophoresis columns. LC-GC. 11:14-20, 1993. 26. Conti, M., Galassi, M., Bossi, A. and Righetti, P. G. Capillary isoelectric focusing: the problem of protein solubility. J. Chromatogr. 757:237-245, 1997. 27. Kobayashi, A. H., Aoiki, M., Suzuki, M., Yanagisawa, A. and Arai, E. Evaluation of pH gradient formation of carrier ampholytes with synthesized isoelectric point markers in capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. A 772:137-144, 1997. 28. Shimura, K., Wang, Z., Matsumoto, H. and Kasai, K. Synthetic oligopeptides as isoelectric point markers for capillary isoelectric focusing with ultraviolet absorption detection. Electrophoresis 2000 21:603-610, 2000. 29. Shimura, K., Kamiya, K., Matsumoto, H. and Kasai, I. Fluorescence-labeled peptide pI markers for capillary isoelectric focusing. Anal. Chem. 74:1046-1053, 2002. 30. ~lais, K. and Friedl, Z. Low-molecular-mass pI markers for isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. A 661:249-256, 1994. 31. ~lais, K., Horkfi, M., Novfi~kovfi, J. and Friedl, Z. Fluorescein-based pI markers for capillary isoelectric focusing with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis 2002 23:1682-1688, 2002. 32. Wu, J. and Pawlyszyn, J. A capillary cartridge with an on-line desalting device that allows fast sampling for capillary isoelectric focusing. Anal. Chem. 67:2010-2014, 1995. 33. Fang, X., Tragas, C., Wu, J., Mao, Q. and Pawlyszyn, J. Recent developments in capillary isoelectric focusing with whole-column imaging detection. Electrophoresis 19:2290-2295, 1998. 34. Wu, J. and Watson, A. Automated sample introduction for an imaged capillary isoelectric focusing instrument via high-performance liquid chromatography sampling devices. J. Chromatogr. B 714:113-118, 1998. 35. Wu, J., Li, S.-C. and Watson, A. Optimizing separation conditions for proteins and peptides using imaged capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. A 817:163-171, 1998. 36. Jochheim, C., Novick, S., Balland, A., Mahan-Boyce, J., Wang, W.-C., Goetze, A. and Gombotz, W. Separation of Enbrel (rhuTNFR:Fc) isoforms by capillary isoelectric focusing. In CE in Biotechnology: Practical Applications for Protein and Peptide

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

37. 38. 39.

40.

41.

42.

43. 44.

45.

46.

47.

48.

49.

50. 51.

52. 53.

54.

~-t)7

Analysis (Altria, K. D.Ed.) Chromatographia CE Series Vol. 53, Vieweg Publishing, Weisbaden, pp. 59-65, 2001. Banks, J. E Recent advances in capillary electrophoresis/electrospray mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 18:2255-2266, 1997. Tang, Q., Harrata, A. K. and Lee, C. S. Capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray mass spectrometry for protein analysis. Anal. Chem. 67:3515-3519, 1995. Yang, L., Tang, Q., Harrata, A. K. and Lee, C. S. Capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for transferrin glycoforms analysis. Anal. Biochem. 243:140-149, 1996. Tang, Q., Harrata, A. K. and Lee, C. S. Two-dimension analysis of recombinant E. coli proteins using capillary isoelectric focusing electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 69:3177-3182, 1997. Wei, J., Yang, L. Harrata, A. K. and Lee, C. S. High resolution analysis of protein phosphorylation using capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 19:2356-2360, 1998. Wei, J., Lee, C. S., Lazar, I. M. and Lee, M. L. Capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for protein analysis. J. Microcol. Sep. 11:193-197, 1999. Clarke, N. and Naylor, S. Capillary isoelectric focusing-mass spectrometry: analysis of protein mixtures from human body fluids. Biomed. Chromatogr. 16:287-297, 2002. Lamoree, M. H., Tjaden, U. R. and van der Greef, J. Use of microdialysis for the online coupling of capillary isoelectric focusing with electrospray mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A. 777:31-39, 1997. Lamoree, M. H., van der Hoeven, R. A. M., Tjaden, U. R. and van der Greefr, J. Application of microdialysis for on-line coupling of capillarly isoelectric focusing with electrospray mass spectrometry on a magnetic sector instrument, J. Mass Spectrom. 33:453-460, 1998. Chartogne, A., Tjaden, U. R. and van der Greef, J. A free-flow electrophoresis chip device for interfacing capillary isoelectric focusing on-liine with electrospray mass spectrometry. Rapid. Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14:1269-1274, 2000. Yang, L., Lee, C. S., Hofstadler, S. A. and Smith, R. D. Characterization of microdialysis acidification for capillary isoelectric focusing-microelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 70:4945-4950, 1998. Severs, J. C., Hofstadler, S. A., Zhao, Z., Senh, R. T. and Smith, R. D. The interface of capillary electrophoresis with high performance Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry for biomolecule characterization. Electrophoresis 17:1808-1817, 1996. Jensen, P. K., Pa~a-Tolic, L., Anderson, G. A., Horner, J. A., Lipton, M. S., Bruce, J. E. and Smith, R. D. Probing proteomes using capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 71:2076-2084, 1999. Hofmann, O., Che, D., Cruickshank, K. A. and Miiller, U. R. Adaptation of capillary isoelectric focusing to microchannels on a glass chip. Anal. Chem. 71:678-686, 1999. Rossier, J. S., Schwarz, A., Reymond, E, Ferrigno, R., Bianchi, E and Girault, H. H. Microchannel networks for electrophoretic separations. Electrophoresis 20:727-731, 1999. Tan, W., Fan, Z. H., Qiu, C., Ricco, A. J. and Gibbons, I. Miniaturized capillary isoelectric focusing in plastic microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 2002 23:3638-3645, 2002. Tsai, S.-W., Loughran, M., Hiratsuka, A., Yano, K. and Karube, I. Application of plasmaopolymerized films for isoelectric focusing of proteins in a capillary electrophoresis chip. Analyst 128:237-244, 2003. Herr, A. E., Molho, J. I., Drouvalakis, K. A., Mikkelsen, J. C., Utz, P. J., Santiago, J. G. and Kenny, T. W. On-chip coupling of isoelectric focusing and free solution electrophoresis for multidimensional separations. Anal. Chem. 75:1180-1187, 2003.

208

T.WEHR

55. Bolger, C. A., Zhu, M., Rodriguez, R. and Wehr, T. Performance of uncoated and coated capillaries in free zone electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing of proteins. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 14:895-906, 1991. 56. Zhu, M., Wehr, T., Levi, V., Rodriguez, R., Shifter, K. and Cao, Z. A. Capillary electrophoresis of abnormal hemoglobins associated with a-thalassemias. J. Chromatogr. A 652:119-129, 1993. 57. Zhu, M., Rodriguez, R., Wehr, T. and Siebert, C. Capillary electrophoresis of hemoglobins and globin chains. J. Chromatogr. 608:225-237, 1992. 58. Molteni, S., Frischknecht, H. and Thormann, W. Application of dynamic capillary isoelectric focusing to the analysis of human hemoglobin variants. Electrophoresis 15:22-30, 1994. 59. Hempe, J. M. and Craver, R. D. Quantification of hemoglobin variants by capillary isoelectric focusing. Clin. Chem. 40:2288-2295, 1994. 60. Mario, N., Baudin, B., Aussel, C. and Giboudeau, J. Capillary isoelectric focusing and high-performance cation exchange chromatography compared for qualitative and quantitative analysis of hemoglobin variants. Clin Chem. 43:2137-2142, 1997. 61. Hempe, J. M., Granger, J. N., Warrier, R. P. and Craver, R. D. Analysis of hemoglobin variants by capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Capillary Electrophoresis 4:131-135, 1997. 62. Mohammad, A. A., Okorodudu, A. O., Bissell, M. G., Dow, P., Reger, G., Meier, A., Guodagno, P. and Petersen, J. R. Clinical application of capillary isoelectric focusing on fused silica capillary for determination of hemoglobin variants. Clin. Chem. 43:1798-1799, 1997. 63. Mario, N., Baudin, B. and Giboudeau, J. J. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of hemoglobin variants by capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. B, 706:123-129, 1998. 64. Jenkins, M. A. and Ratnaike, S. Capillary isoelectric focusing of haemoglobin variants in the clinical laboratory. Clin. Chim. Acta 289:121-132, 1999. 65. Conti, C., Gelfi, A., Bosisio, B. and Righetti, P. G. Quantitation of glycated hemoglobins in human adult blood by capillary isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 17:1590-1596, 1996. 66. Hempe, J. M. and Craver, R. D. Quantification of hemoglobin variants by capillary isoelectric focusing. Clin. Chem. 40:2288-2295, 1994. 67. Righetti, P. G., Conti, M. and Gelfi, C. Study of haptoglobin-hemoglobin complexes by titration curves, capillary electrophoresis and capillary isoelectric focusing J. Chromatogr. A 767:255-262, 1997. 68. Yim, K. W. Fractionation of the human recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) glycoforms by high-performance capillary zone electrophoresis and capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 559:401-410, 1991. 69. Thorne, J. M., Goetzinger, W. K., Chen, A. B., Moorhouse, K. G. and Karger, B. L. Examination of capillary zone electrophoresis, capillary isoelectric focusing and sodium dodecyl sulfate capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. J. Chromatogr. A 744:155-165, 1996. 70. Kubach, J. and Grimm, R. Non-native capillary isoelectric focusing for the analysis of the microheterogeneity of glycoproteins. J. Chromatogr. A 737:281-289, 1996. 71. Moorhouse, K. G., Eusebio, C. A., Hunt, G. and Chen, A. B. Rapid one-step capillary isoelectric focusing method to monitor charged glycoforms of recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator. J. Chromatogr. A 717:61-69,1995. 72. Cifuentes, A., Moreno-Arribas, M. V., de Frutos, M. and Diez-Masa, J. C. Capillary isoelectric focusing of erythropoietin glycoforms and its comparison with flat-bed isoelectric focusing and capillary zone electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 830:453-463, 1999. 73. Lopez-Soto-Yarritu, P., Diez-Masa, J. C., Cifuentes, A. and de Frutos, M. Improved capillary isoelectric focusing method for recombinant erythropoietin analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 968:221-228, 2002. 74. Kilar, E and Hjerten, S. Fast and high resolution analysis of human serum transferrrin by high performance isoelectric focusing in capillaries. Electrophoresis 10:23-29, 1989.

9

CAPILLARYISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

209

75. Richards, M. P. and Huang, T. L. Metalloprotein analysis by capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. B 690, 43-54, 1997. 76. Wu, J. and Pawliszyn. In vitro observation of interactions of iron and transferrin by capillary isoelectric focusing with a concentration gradient imaging detection system. J. Chromatogr. A 652:295-299, 1993. 77. Huang, T. L. and Richards, M. P. Development of a high-performance capillary isoelectric focusing technique with application to studies of microheterogeneity in chicken conalbumin. J. Chromatogr. A 757:247-253, 1997. 78. Tran, N. T., Taverna, M., Chevalier, M. and Ferrier, D. One-step capillary isoelectric focusing for the separation of the recombinant human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein glycoforms. J. Chromatogr. A 866:121-135, 2000. 79. Krull, S., Kazmi, S., Zhong, H. and Santora, L. C. Separation of glycoproteins by capillary isoelectric focusing. In Methods in Molecular Biology,Vol. 213 (Thibault, P. and Honda, S. Eds.) Humana Press, Totowa, pp. 197-218, 2003, NJ. 80. Reif, O.-S. and Freitag, R. Control of the cultivation process of antithrombin III and its characterization by capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 680:383-394, 1994. 81. Hunt, G., Moorhouse, K. G. and Chen, A. B. Capillary isoelectric focusing and sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis of recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody HER2. J. Chromatgr. A 744:295-301, 1996. 82. Hagmann, M. L., Kionka, C., Schreiner, M. and Schwer, C. Characterization of the F(ab') 2 fragment of a murine monoclonal antibody using capillary isoelectric focusing and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 816:49-58, 1998. 83. Lee, H. G. Rapid high-performance capillary isoelectric focusing of monoclonal antibodies in uncoated fused-silica capillaries. J. Chromatogr. A 790:215-223, 1997. 84. Hunt, G., Hotaling, T. and Chen, A. B. Validation of a capillary isoelectric focusing method for the recombinant monoclonal antibody C2B8. J. Chromatogr. A 800: 355-367,1998. 85. Mazzeo, J. R., Martineau, J. A and Krull, I. S. Peptide mapping using EOF-driven capillary isoelectric focusing. Anal. Biochem. 208:323-329, 1993. 86. Sheng, L. and Pawliszyn, J. Comprehensive two dimensional separation based on coupling micellary electrokinetic chromatography with capillary isoelectric focusing. Analyst 127:1159-1163, 2002. 87. Mohan, D. and Lee, C. S. On-line coupling of capillary isoelectric focusing with transient isotachophoresis-zone electrophoresis: A two-dimensional separation system for proteomics. Electrophoresis 2002 23:3160-3167, 2002. 88. Shen, Y., Berger, S. J., Anderson, G. A. and Smith, R. D. High-efficiency capillary isoelectric focusing of peptides. Anal. Chem. 72:2154-2159,2000. 89. Mao, Y. and Zhang, X. Comprehensive two-dimensional separation system by coupling capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography to capillary isoelectric focusing for peptide and protein mapping with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis 2003 24:3289-3295, 2003. 90. Cruickshank, K. A., Olvera, J. and Muller, U. R. Simultaneous multiple analyte detection using fluorescent peptides and capillary isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. A 817:41-47, 1998. 91. Okun, V. Affinity mode of capillary isoelectric focusing for the characterization of the biotin-binding protein actinavidin. Electrophoresis 19:427-432, 1998. 92. Lyubarskaya, Y. V., Carr, S. A., Dunnington, D., Prichett, W. P., Fisher, S. M., Appelbaum, E. R., Jones, C. S. and Karger, B. L. Screening for high-affinity ligands to the Src SH2 domain using capillary isoelectric focusing-electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 70:4761-4770, 1998. 93. Shen, Y. and Smith, R. D. Proteomics based on high-efficiency capillary separations. Electrophoresis 2002 23:3106-3124, 2002. 94. Manabe, T. Capillary electrophoresis of proteins for proteomic studies. Electrophoresis 1999 20:3116-3121,1999.

210

T. WEHR

95. Manabe, T. Combination of electrophoretic techniques for comprehensive analysis of complex protein systems. Electrophoresis 2000 21:1116-1122, 2000. 96. Manabe, T. Analysis of complex protein-polypeptide systems for proteomic studies. J. Chromatogr. B 787:29-41, 2003. 97. Manabe, T., Miyamoto, H. and Iwasaki, A. Effects of catholytes on the mobilization of proteins after capillary isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 18:92-97, 1997. 98. Manabe, T., Iwasaki, A. and Miyamoto, H. Separation of human plasma/serum proteins by capillary isoelectric focusing in the absence of denaturing agents. Electrophoresis 18:1159-1165, 1997. 99. Jensen, P. K., Pa~a-Tolid, L., Peden, K. K., Martinovid, S., Lipton, M. S., Anderson, G. A., Tolic, N., Wong, K.-K. and Smith, R. D. Mass spectrometric detection for capillary isoelectric focusing separations of complex protein mixtures. Electrophoresis 21: 1372-1380, 2000. 100. Martinovid, S., Berger, S. J., Pa~a-Tolid, L. and Smith, R. D. Separation and detection of intact noncovalent protein complexes from mixtures by on-line capillary isoelectric focusing-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 72:5356-5360, 2000. 101. Shen, Y., Berger, S. J. and Smith, R. D. High-efficiency capillary isoelectric focusing of protein complexes from Escherichia coli cytosolic extracts. J. Chromatogr. A 914:257-264, 2001. 102. Horkfi, M., Planeta, J., Rfizi~ka, E and ~lais, K. Sol-gel column technology for capillary isoelectric focusing of microorganisms and biopolymers with UV or fluorometric detection. Electrophoresis 24:1383-1390, 2003. 103. Shen, Y., Berger, S. J. and Smith, R. D. Capillary isoelectric focusing of yeast cells. Anal. Chem. 72:4603-4607, 2000. 104. Michalke, B. and Schramel, P. Application of capillary zone electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and capillary isoelectric focusing-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for selenium speciation. J. Chromatogr. 807:71-80, 1998.

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING PETER J. A.WEBER, GERHARD WEBER, CHRISTOPH ECKERSKORN, ULRICH SCHNEIDER, A N D A N T O N POSCH

FFEWeber GmbH IZB, Building 6,Am Klopferspitz 19, D-82152 Planegg/Munich, Germany

I. INTRODUCTION II. PRINCIPLE OF FFE A. General Information B. Principle of the IEF Separation Mode C. Principles of Other Separation Modes D. Important Theoretical Parameters E. Important Practical Parameters F. Alternative Liquid-based IEFTechniques III. INSTRUMENTATION A. Historical Overview B. Pro TeamTM FFE C. FFE as Part of an Automated Proteomics Platform D. FFE Prototypes IV. APPLICATIONS A. General Considerations B. FF-IEF of Proteins C. Impact of FF-IEF in Proteomics D. Other FF-IEFApplications E. Non-FF-IEF Applications V. SUMMARY REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Free-flow electrophoresis (FFE) represents one of the most versatile preparative-scale fractionation and separation techniques used in (bio)chemistry. 1-4 It was first described more than 40 years ago and entitled "matrix-free, preparative flow-through electrophoresis ''s and "matrix-flee, continuous-flow electrophoresis ( C F E ) " . 6 These descriptions 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

211

212

P.J.A.WEBER ecal.

exactly pinpoint the characteristics and advantages of the method: The continuous operation principle allows virtually unlimited preparative fractionations, whereas the absence of any matrix leads to high sample recovery, fast fractionation, and high sample throughput. Furthermore, FFE allows the combination with all kinds of downstream analysis techniques such as liquid chromatography, 7 gel electrophoresis, 8 or mass spectrometry (MS). 9 In addition, it allows the separation of all kinds of charged or chargeable samples, including low-molecular-weight organic compounds, peptides, proteins, protein complexes, membranes, organelles, and whole cells. 1~This can be achieved using a variety of different separation modes such as isoelectric focusing (IEF), zone electrophoresis (ZE), field-step electrophoresis (FSE), and isotachophoresis (ITP). 11 Some of these techniques are gentle enough to permit the fractionation of viable cells ~2 and active enzymes. 13 Like all technologies, FFE also has its limitations and problems, and they should not be overlooked. For example, FFE is demanding of the inexperienced operator as a consequence of the multitude of critical parameters that must be optimized for the undisturbed operation of FFE instruments. In addition, there are a variety of physical distortions of the separation process itself that still offer room for improvements. 1 This review is meant to provide the interested reader with a comprehensive overview of the principle of FF-IEF and FFE itself covering all relevant parameters, the historical, state of the art, and future instrumentation as well as the most recent applications. In addition, it includes information about related technologies wherever appropriate in order to allow their proper comparison. II. PRINCIPLE OF FFE A. General Information

For separation by FFE, the samples are continuously injected into a thin, laminar film of aqueous separation buffer flowing through a chamber formed between two closely spaced plates. An electrical field is impressed perpendicular to the flow direction. As separation buffer and samples move through the chamber, the electric field differentially deflects sample components according to their electrophoretic mobilities. Each component's deflection is a function of the strength of the electric field, its electrophoretic mobility, and the flow rate. As a result, sample components that enter the chamber as a mixture at one end leave the chamber at the other end as separated components that can be collected in different vials (see Figure 1). There are a number of FFE separation modes that are differentiated merely by the buffer composition. 14 FF-IEF provides the highest resolution, so it is the most important FFE mode. This is particularly true for

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

213

F I G U R E I Principle of FFE. A high voltage between electrodes generates an electric field perpendicular to a laminar flow causing charged species to migrate, i.e., to be deflected according to their electrophoretic mobility.

the separation of proteins and peptides, is The other major modes are zone electrophoresis (FF-ZE), 16 field-step electrophoresis (FF-FSE), 17 and isotachophoresis (ITP-FFE), TM but different kinds of mixed modes are also possible. 19,2~

B. Principle of the IEF Separation Mode Amphoteric compounds, particularly peptides and proteins, are FFEfractionated and purified with highest resolution when separated by IEE During IEF, the electric field moves the compounds through field-induced pH gradients. Linear pH gradients can either be formed by polymeric ampholytes, low-molecular-weight buffer pairs, 21 or low-molecular-weight Prolytes TM (well-defined, reproducible mixtures of low-molecular-weight organic acids, bases, and zwitterions (Mw < 300) that allow highly reproducible runs as well as easy removal from the sample components); 22 stepwise pH gradients can be formed by adjacent introduction of different buffers. If a sample component reaches a buffer region, which has a pH identical to its isoelectric point (pI), it loses its net charge and becomes immobile with respect to the electrical field (see Figure 2). IEF as a focusing mode leads to very sharp bands (high resolution), because if a compound leaves its isoelectric pH region by diffusion or other band-broadening effects, it gets charged again and the electric field will force it to migrate back.

C. Principles of Other Separation Modes I. ZE In contrast to FF-IEF, FF-ZE is a non-focusing separation mode thus having much lower resolution (Cf. Figures 3 and 2). For ZE, uniform

214

P.J.A.WEBER et al.

F I G U R E 2 Separation scheme of FF-IEF experiments. After entering the separation chamber directly, the samples are relatively diffuse, because the pH gradient has not been formed yet. In parallel with the formation of the pH gradient, the samples become aligned according to their individual pl values.Their zones become sharper and sharper and remain sharp due to the focusing effect of the pH gradient.

separation buffers of constant composition, pH, and conductivity are used. This means that the sample components are merely separated according to their constant electrophoretic mobilities (charge to size ratio) at a given pH. Therefore, the sample injection beam has to be as narrow as possible, because there is no focusing effect to counteract band broadening. ZE is predominantly used for the separation of cells, membranes, and organelles, because they typically do not have discrete pI values. In addition, the ZE separation buffers are less complex and more flexible than the IEF separation buffers, thus allowing milder separation conditions.

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

215

F I G U R E 3 Separation scheme of FF-ZE experiments. Since the typical FFErelated distortion effects are not counteracted by a focusing effect, the sample stream gets broader and broader on its way through the separation chamber. In addition, the absence of any focusing effect leads to a continual migration, perpendicular to the laminar flow.

2. FSE

FSE is similar to ZE, except that the conductivity of the separation buffer is not uniform across the separation chamber: A low-conductivity buffer is pumped through the chamber adjacent to a high-conductivity one. The sample (typically dilute) is introduced into the chamber as a very broad sample beam via the low-conductivity buffer. As for ZE, the sample migrates towards the high-conductivity medium on its way through the chamber, driven by the electrical field. Since the voltage is inversely proportional to the conductivity, the sample will be retarded as soon as it reaches the conductivity step, i.e., the sample will focus at the

216

P.3.A.WEBER

et al.

interface between the high- and low-conductivity buffer. Thus, large amounts of sample (several g/h) can be concentrated to a sharp band and harvested with a high concentration into one fraction tube. Accordingly, FSE is very useful for the high-throughput concentration of dilute solutions of rather pure proteins. 3. ITP

Many compounds are insoluble in buffers having pH values similar to their pI. For them, FFE-ITP may be an alternative method. Generally, in ITP, at least three different buffers are necessary. The first buffer contains the so-called leading ions having a high electrophoretic mobility. The middle buffer is composed of the sample and so-called spacing ions having intermediate electrophoretic mobilities. The last buffer contains the so-called terminating ions having a low electrophoretic mobility. When an electric field is applied, the sample ions line up between the leading ions, the spacing ions, and the terminating ions according to their own electrophoretic mobilities. ITP is similar to the more familiar "stacking" phenomenon, but there is no "unstacking" mechanism, such as a sharp decrease in gel pore size. The quality of the separation highly depends on the sample components and on the choice of the spacing ions. Some components will be concentrated at boundaries between spacing ions because their electrophoretic mobilities fit between those of the spacers. Other components will be spread throughout the zones of the spacing ions with equal electrophoretic mobilities. D. Important Theoretical Parameters

I. Hydrodynamic Distortion

FFE separation buffers show a non-turbulent streamline flow profile typical for liquids that flow as layers between two parallel plates. This so-called laminar flow profile is characterized by a parabolic shape, i.e., the fluid velocity is zero at all bounding walls and reaches a maximum midway between the walls. Laminar flow is an intrinsic problem of all kinds of FFE separations, because sample ions flowing midway between the walls will spend less time in the electric field than sample ions near the walls. This leads to broad sample bands having crescent shapes. The phenomenon, referred to as hydrodynamic distortion, can be reduced by either increasing the distance between the separation chamber walls or by reducing the size of the sample band at the injection point. However, the first measure will cause thermal distortions (see Section III.D.2) and the second measure will reduce the throughput. 2. Thermal Distortion

An inherent problem of all electrophoresis systems is the so-called Joule heating. This temperature increase occurs whenever a current

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

217

passes through a conductor such as the FFE separation buffer. Because the chamber walls can dissipate the heat that is generated during FFE, the buffer near the walls will be cooler than the buffer midway between the walls. These temperature differences are equivalent to density differences and will cause thermal convections, which will distort the separation. Thus, it is a basic requirement to use narrow separation chambers (thickness
Charged double layers near the separation chamber walls caused by ionizable functional groups of the wall material very often result in a net flow close to the walls toward the cathode. This phenomenon, known as electro-osmotic flow, can be another reason for band broadening. Sample or buffer ions near the walls are dragged toward the cathode, whereas the ions midway between the walls remain unaffected by this surface effect. This so-called electrodynamic distortion leads to crescent shapes of sample bands similar to those caused by the hydrodynamic distortion. In cases where electrodynamic and hydrodynamic distortion oppose each other, the corresponding band broadening might vanish; in all other cases it will worsen the situation. To minimize the electroosmotic flow, measures have to be taken to reduce the number of ionizable functional groups at the surfaces of the chamber walls. This can be achieved by the replacement of easily ionizable glass walls with appropriate plastic walls, by the static covalent modification of surfaces with appropriate polymers, or by the addition of surface-active compounds like hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), to the separation buffer that will coat the surfaces dynamically. 4. Electrohydrodynamic Distortion

Conductivity differences between the sample and the separation buffer cause sheer stresses that are independent of the previous distortion phenomena. 23,24 This so-called electrohydrodynamic distortion leads to changes of the sample stream shape (flattening in the direction toward the wall or toward the electrodes), thus also causing band broadening. The phenomenon can be eliminated by careful adjustment of the sample conductivity and the separation buffer conductivity.

218

P.J.A.WEBER e t

al.

E. Important Practical Parameters I. External Flow Distortion

The turbulence-flee flow of the separation medium is easily distorted by external factors such as air bubbles or lint. To avoid the introduction of lint it normally suffices to use lint-free paper tissues for cleaning chamber walls and to filter the separation buffers before use. To prevent the introduction of air bubbles the liquid levels of all separation buffers have to be checked regularly. For FF-IEF experiments, stationary air bubbles in the first third of the separation chamber might be tolerable, because of the focusing principle that will make up for the distortion, but most of the time they lead to a permanent disturbance that requires the abortion of the experiment.

2. Reagent Purity It is important to use only high-purity water as well as chemicals of the highest grade available. Ionic impurities dramatically increase the conductivity of the separation buffers or can be focused and precipitated in the separation chamber, which would lead to a massive distortion of the separation process. The quality differences of detergents are specifically pronounced, because the detergents themselves as well as their impurities interact not only with the sample components such as proteins, but also with the surfaces of the separation chamber walls as well leading to unpredictable phenomena. 3. Separation Buffer

Each separation exercise requires a suitable set of media. Important considerations in media selection include: (a) the electrolytes rinsing the electrodes must optimally transfer electrical power from the electrodes to the chamber without causing detrimental effects on the separation process or the sample; (b) the actual separation media in the chamber must favor separability, solubility, and activity of the compound of interest; 21,22'25 (c) the anodal and cathodal margin media flowing laterally in the separation chamber (if applicable) must prevent contamination of the membranes with compounds from the separation area and vice versa to protect the separation area from the influence of the electrodes (for FF-IEF this is typically achieved by addition of ions with a high electrophoretic mobility like sulphuric acid for the anode and sodium hydroxide for the cathode); 26 and (d) all media in the separation chamber must be adjusted with regard to their specific densities and viscosities at the temperature of the experiment to avoid unpredictable phase boundary effects and/or turbulences.

4. Sample Preparation To avoid electrohydrodynamic distortions (see above) as well as unpredictable phase boundary effects and turbulences it is crucial to match the

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

219

density, viscosity, and conductivity of the sample solution and the separation buffer. This can be easily achieved by preparation of a concentrated sample solution and its subsequent dilution with separation buffer (at least 1:5). If the sample components are not stable at the pH of the separation buffer, or the sample concentration would be too low after dilution with the separation buffer, solid buffer ingredients can be added directly to the sample to yield the same viscosity, density, and conductivity.

5. Sample Precipitation Two factors increase the tendency of samples to precipitate during IEF experiments: the low solubility of compounds at their isoelectric point and the high local concentration of focused compounds. Very often, this leads to the precipitation of the one or a few compounds out of a mixture having the highest concentration and/or the lowest solubility at their pI values. If the FFE instrument design allows following the separation visually, precipitation can be easily detected as sharp white lines occurring in the separation chamber. As long as these lines stay sharp and keep moving, one can keep on fractionating the sample. When "flakes" (that might clog the fractionation outlets) or stationary "islands" (that might cause turbulences and local overheating) form, the sample flow has to be reduced, or the sample has to be diluted, or some detergent has to be added to the sample and/or separation buffer. 6. Sedimentation There are two kinds of sedimentation: particle sedimentation and zone sedimentation. Particle sedimentation is a result of density differences between the sample (mainly in the case of cells and organelles) and the separation buffer. This most often occurs when the density of the sample particles is higher than the density of the surrounding separation buffer and the sample particles sink. This directly leads to band broadening. Particle sedimentation can be avoided by adjusting the density of the separation buffer by running the FFE experiment in the vertical position or in an exotic approach by running the experiment under microgravity (see Section III.A.2.). Zone sedimentation occurs when buffer ingredients or sample components accumulate in a narrow zone, e.g., by IEE This effect might make this zone denser than the surrounding solution, causing the zone to sediment within the solution. This phenomenon is virtually impossible to avoid, except by running the experiment under microgravity (see Section III.A.2.). F. Alternative Liquid-based IEF Techniques There are a variety of alternative liquid-based methods and instruments for the pI-dependent separation of proteins (see Table 1). All of them depend on some kind of compartmentalization utilizing a membrane,

220

P.J.A.WEBER et al.

TABLE

I

Alternative Instruments for the pl-dependent Separation of Proteins

I n s t r u m e n t name

Manufacturer

Recent publications a

Gradiflow TM BF 400

Gradipore, Frenchs Forest, NSW, Australia Proteome Systems, North Ryde, NSW, Australia Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK DiagnoSwiss, Monthey, Switzerland Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA

28-33

IsoelectrIQ2 IsoPrimeTM Off-Gel TM electrophoresis Rotofor | ZOOM | IEF Fractionator

34, 35 36 37, 38 39-44 45-47

aSome publications discuss prototype instruments and others discuss applications.

grid, or matrix. This is a fundamental difference to FF-IEF, because any interaction on passage through a membrane, grid, or matrix inevitably suffers from a high risk of material loss. In addition, the compartment-based instruments are typically designed for batch-wise processing, which limits their throughput when compared with the continuous separation by FF-IEE Nevertheless, they prove to be very useful for certain separation needs (see Table 1). Since they are not in the scope of this chapter, we refer those interested to the preceding chapter on "Alternative forms of IEF" and an excellent recent review. 27 III. INSTRUMENTATION A. Historical Overview I. The EarlyYears

A few years after the publication of the basic FFE principles in the late 1950s and early 1960s of the last century, s,6 the development of the first commercial FFE instruments started and within 10-20 years a huge variety of instruments was in the market. These early commercial devices included the FF machine from Brinkmann Instruments (Westbury, NY, USA);48,49the FF-4 instrument from Desaga (Heidelberg, Germany); 5~ the FF-5 instrument (Biomedical Instruments, New York, NY, USA);51 the ACE 710 (Hirschmann, Unterhaching, Germany); 52,s3 the BIOSTREAM with an annulus geometry (CJB Developments, Portsmoth, USA); 54'55 and above all the VaP machines (VaP-5, VaP-11, VaP-21, VaP-22, VaP-220 of Bender & Hobein, Munich, Germany). 56-6~In particular, Hannig and his co-workers supported this maturation of the FFE technology, but others, like Strickler, made important contributions too. Hundreds of instruments were sold and were used in laboratories around the world for the successful separation of

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

221

all kinds of compounds from low-molecular-weight organic compounds, peptides, and proteins, to organelles and whole cells. 1~This is documented by a multitude of publications in the 1960s, to 1 9 8 0 s . 61-63 However, most of these experiments were performed done in the ZE mode and to a lesser extent in the ITP or FSE mode. Of course, the high resolution achievable by IEF encouraged many to develop a free-flow version of the proces, too, but none of them was really successful. 64-68 This was mainly due to very long focusing times requiring either a slow flow through the chamber or a very long chamber, the uncontrollable pH drift toward the cathode (electro-osmosis), and the necessity to reduce the voltage/current levels because of insufficient heat dissipation (thermal convection). As a consequence, this led to two new trends: recycling instruments and compartmentalized instruments (mainly in combination with external coolers) or hybrids thereof. One of the most innovative scientist was Bier, who introduced the recycling isoelectric focusing (RIEF) instrument 69,7~and the commercially very successful Rotofor | (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).71 Righetti made very important contributions too, which led to the development of the membrane-based multicompartment IsoPrime TM system (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK).72 Other recycling instruments that entered the market at that time were the RF3 TM by Protein Technologies (Tucson, AZ, USA), and the ATIsolator TM (Ampholife Technologies, The Woodlands, TX, USA). 2. FFE in Space

In the 1980s, space agencies like NASA had some difficulties justifying their expensive space missions. Thus, they sought beneficial scientific experiments that suffer from gravity on earth to help legitimize their flights, and to increase public acceptance. FFE offered a perfect system. After a variety of space experiments in the 1970s and early 1980s using static column electrophoresis, actual FFE experiments began in 1982 during space shuttle mission STS-4 using a McDonnell Douglas CFE system (CFES) and during the Soviet Salyut-7 mission using the FFE system "Tavriya". More than ten space-flight missions followedf 3 and several other nations like Germany (Messerschmitt-B61kow-Blohm (MBBERNO, now DASA) with their TEM 06-13)f 4 Japan (NASDA space agency and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries with their FFE unit FFEU)f 5 and France (Matra with their free-flow device RAMSES) 76 did their share too. Comparing the results of all of these experiments and their impact on FFE technology on Earth with hundreds of millions of dollars that they cost, their outcome is absolutely meagre. Nevertheless, the Japanese FFE microgravity research continues to the present day. 77 An excellent review about FFE in space was published recently.78 3. The Recent Years

In the late 1980s, stagnation of FFE technology, particularly in the field of FF-IEF, the reduced interest in traditional FFE fields like

222

P.j.A.WEBER

et al.

organelle separations, the rise of new fields like molecular biology, and improvements in other techniques like RP-HPLC for peptides and small proteins and FACS for cells gradually ousted FFE and its manufacturers from the market. However, in the early 1990s, Dr. Weber GmbH (Ismaning, Germany) developed a new FFE instrument called OCTOPUS (see Figure 4) addressing the technological and experimental problems with a variety of innovative concepts. 79,8~ They established a reproducible IEF mode with high resolution is and improved the general robustness of the FFE process by means of so-called "margin" and "counterflow" media. 26 Combined with an intelligent patent policy, this allowed the company to survive the ongoing selection and consolidation process mentioned above as the only provider of FFE instruments in the late 1990s. This was just about the time when the whole field of biological sample fractionation experienced a second spring with the advent of the proteomics era. 81 The reduction of sample complexity either at the protein or at the organelle level is a prerequisite for successful proteomic analyses. Consequently, there is a dramatic need for reproducible, versatile separation processes with high throughput and reasonable resolution like liquid-based IEF methods or liquid chromatography. 27,82 Dr. Weber GmbH was acquired by TECAN (Mfinnedorf, Switzerland) in order to use FFE as the initial part of an automated platform for proteome analyses (see below). After a complete redesign of the OCTOPUS, the socalled Pro Team TM FFE (see Figure 5) offers a unique portfolio of

F I G U R E 4 OCOTPUS FFE instrument (Dr.Weber GmbH): I, tower containing power supply, electrode pump, media pump, and electronic control unit; 2, separation media bottles; 3, sample pump; 4, separation chamber; 5, fractionation housing to hold 96-well plates.

I0

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

223

FIGURE 5 Pro Team TM FFE instrument (Tecan): I, sample holder; 2, sample pump; 3, separation media pump; 4, separation media bottles; 5, electrolyte bottles; 6, separation chamber; 7, fractionation tubing; 8, 96-well plate holder; 9, waste; 10, touch screen control unit.The power supply is integrated in the system.

methods for the fractionation and prefractionation of proteins and organelles by IEF and ZE, respectively (see the section "Applications"). Mainly due to the patent situation it is still the only free-flow instrument in the market. Nevertheless, falling back on compartmentalized devices other companies sought to offer alternative liquid-based instruments for the pI-dependent separation of proteins. These devices include the Gradiflow TM BF 400 (Gradipore, Frenchs Forest, Australia), IsoelectrlQ 2 (Proteome Systems, North Ryde, Australia), Off-Gel TM electrophoresis (DiagnoSwiss, Monthey, Switzerland), and ZOOM | IEF Fractionator (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA)(Table 1). B. Pro Team TM FFE

Principally, an FFE instrument consists of a separation chamber, a fraction collector, a cooling device, a high-voltage power supply, several pumps

224

P.J.A. WEBER et al.

for the electrolytes, the separation buffers, and the sample (Figure 6). In this section, the configuration of FFE instruments shall be described in more detail using as an example the Pro TeamT M FFE instrument, since it is the only FFE instrument currently in the market. The marketing of new FFE instruments by FFEWeber GmbH will be started in May/June 2004. These instruments are based on a modular conception. The standard version is mainly consisting of the FFE-process unit, whereas the enhanced version will offer an additional module to control and record the FFE process. An add-on robotic unit to transport different samples and fractionation cabinets allow the automatic processing of 24 samples in a continuous, unattended operation mode. The heart of the process unit is a very precisely manufactured electrophoresis chamber with a length of 500 mm and a width of 100 mm (Figures 5 and 7). It consists of a front plate and a back plate. The thickness of the electrophoresis chamber is defined by a so-called spacer and equals typically 0.4-0.5 mm. The back plate is made from aluminum and can be cooled via an external cooling device. The aluminum block is covered by a glass plate. The glass plate itself is covered by a special transparent foil to lower sample adsorption and electro-osmosis. The front plate is made from Plexiglas. The plates are connected by a hinge to facilitate the opening and cleaning of the chamber. At both sides of the front plate, platinum wire electrodes are mounted in suitable channels. A highvoltage power supply is integrated in the instrument and is connected to the electrodes by high-voltage cables. The electrode channels have to be

FIGURE 6

S c h e m a t i c of an F F E i n s t r u m e n t .

I0

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

225

covered by membranes and filter paper strips which separate the electrophoresis and electrode chambers. The chamber may be tilted at any angle between horizontal and vertical, but the best results for avoiding sedimentation with samples like proteins are usually obtained in the horizontal mode. At one end of the chamber are seven media inlets and three sample inlets (Figure 7). This allows pumping of various media through the chamber by means of an eight-channel peristaltic pump and introduction of the sample at the site of choice with a single-channel peristaltic pump. At the other end of the chamber are 96 fractionation outlets and one additional medium inlet. This inlet is used for the counterflow medium (Figures 7 and 8) also delivered by the eight-channel peristaltic pump. The counterflow has several functions: (a) it stabilizes the turbulence-flee transition of the chamber flow to the 96 tubes; (b) it provides a uniform flow to all 96 tubes independent of the separation media flow rates; and (c) it allows to stabilize sensitive samples directly after their

FIGURE 7

Detailed scheme of the ProTeam TM FFE separation chamber (Tecan).

226

P.j.A.WEBER

et al.

separation, e.g., by induction of a pH shift. The actual separation media is introduced via chamber inlets I2-I6 (Figure 7). The so-called "margin" or "stabilization" media that are introduced via chamber inlets I1 and I7 flow along both edges cover the electrode membranes and protect the separation media from detrimental influences of the electrodes. Electrolytes rinsing the electrodes are recirculated by means of an extra pump. There are two quality control tests to check the proper assembly and functioning of the separation chamber. The "stripe test" is done without applying voltage and serves to control the laminar flow profile in the separation chamber and the integrity of the tubing (Figure 8). The "performance test" is done under real fractionation conditions and serves to control the actual performance of the separation chamber (Figure 9). The test mimics the fractionation of the sample by the fractionation of a mixture of dyes having different pI values using the same separation media, voltage, temperature, flow rate, etc. C. FFE as Part of an Automated Proteomics Platform

FF-IEF is one of the cornerstones in TECAN's comprehensive approach for the automation of proteome analyses. This choice is based on four fundamental requirements: fractionation (i.e., the reduction of complexity), sensitivity (i.e., the detection of unknown, low abundance proteins), reproducibility (i.e., the generation of scientifically significant results), and throughput (i.e., the generation of large amounts of valuable data in a short period of time). FF-IEF directly addresses two of the requirements: the reduction of sample complexity and high sensitivity. To address the other requirements, FFE was integrated as a first module into the so-called Pro Team TM platform followed by a fully automated 2DPAGE system (including IEF, gel casting, SDS-PAGE, and staining), and a Protein Processing System (a spot picking device followed by an in-gel digester and an interface to mass spectrometers) all linked together by a LIMS system (see Figure 10). D. FFE Prototypes I. ProTeam

TM

FFE-Related Prototypes

Efforts to improve the throughput of the Pro Team TM FFE instrument included design of parallel separation regions within the existing separation chamber (Figure 11). With this prototype, configuration up to four independent separation areas was created that allowed a 4-fold increase in the sample throughput. Analogously, attempts at improving the resolution the Pro Team TM FFE instrument included design of a serial separation process within the existing separation (a prototype is shown in Figure 12). Three scenarios

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

227

F I G U R E 8 "Stripe test" (a) to control the laminar flow profile in the separation chamber (b) and the integrity of the tubing. This quality control experiment is performed without voltage by placing some of the separation media tubes in water and others in red dyed water.

are possible: (a) one-to-one transfer of all fraction outlets from separation area 1 as media inlets to separation area 2 (i.e., no addition of new separation media to separation area 2); (b) transfer of all fraction outlets from separation area 1 as sample inlets to separation area 2 (i.e., addition of new separation media to separation area 2); and (c) transfer of one fraction outlet from separation area 1 as sample inlet to separation area 2.

228

P.j.A.WEBER et al.

F I G U R E 9 "Performance test" (a) to control the actual performance of the separation chamber (b) and the whole instrument. This quality control experiment is performed under real fractionation conditions. It mimics the fractionation of the sample by the fractionation of a mixture of one red and six yellow dyes having different pl values.

2. Others

Poggel and Melin addressed the conflicting demands of minimizing thermal distortion versus high sample throughput with a new FFE design. 83 Traditionally, macroscopic FFE design relied on a reduction on the thickness of the separation chamber to values of <1 mm to dissipate Joule heating. This exerts constraints on sample throughput. The new design still relies on a reduction of one dimension of the separation

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

229

F I G U R E II High-throughput FFE.Three parallel separation areas ( I - 3 ) within the geometry of a Pro Team TM FFE instrument are shown. I a-3a, parallel sample and media inlets; 4, parallel fraction outlet.

chamber to dissipate the heat, but instead of the thickness, the width of the chamber was reduced to 1-2 mm, i.e., the distance between the electrodes. This definitely allowed an increase in sample throughput and the dissipation of the Joule heating, but at a very high price: the resolution of the system is very low, because merely six fractions could be seperated. This is in strong contrast to classical FFE instruments with widths of approximately 100mm and 96 fractions for high resolution. Thus, choosing high resolution versus high throughput depends on the aim of the separation experiment.

230

P.J.A. WEBER et al.

FIGURE 12 High-resolution FFE.Two serial separation areas (I and 2) within the g e o m e t r y of a Pro Team T M FFE instrument are shown: I a, sample and media inlet of area I; I b, fraction outlet of area I; 2a, fraction/sample/media inlet of area 2; 2b, fraction outlet of area 2.

Since the pioneering publications by researchers from Ciba-Geigy (now Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), 84,85several groups are trying to miniaturize FFE (similar to, but distinct from, attempts to miniaturize capillary electrophoresis). The benefits of using microfluidic technologies include low volumes of the reagent and samples. Furthermore, the small channel dimensions allow one to generate electric fields of the order of 25 V/cm while keeping the applied voltage below 5 V. By using such a low voltage, energy consumption is reduced and gas bubble production at the electrodes is minimized or even eliminated without any cooling. In addition, the small dimensions of the microfluidic devices allow the samples to migrate within a few seconds. However, in micro-scale flow regimes, energy dissipation, electrokinetic forces, and surface tension often dominate, e.g., the massive change of the volume to surface ratio clearly increases the electro-osmotic flow. In the following, the latest attempts to miniaturize FFE are summarized. The Yager research group worked on implementing ZE and IEF in microfluidic free-flow devices. In various publications they demonstrated the concentration of bacteria as well as proteins under flowing conditions as well as the electrolysis-mediated generation of pH gradients. The micro channels were constructed from layers of polymeric film (Mylar) held together by a pressure-sensitive acrylate adhesive and two parallel 40-mm-long electrodes made of gold or palladium with interelectrode gaps of 1.27-2.54mm the top and bottom transparent windows were separated by 0.2-0.354mm and allowed the optical quantification of the experiments. 86-89 A miniaturized FFE device was developed and used for ZE separations by van der Greef's group. It consisted of two parallel Plexiglas plates (transparent, low electro-osmotic flow, and minor protein adsorption) that were separated with a spacer of 100 pm thickness. The dimensions of the separation compartment were 20 • 23 • 0.1 mm. Nitrocellulose membranes with a 0.8 pm pore size were used to provide the electrical connection between the electrodes and the separation compartment because of

I0

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

231

their large pressure resistance in combination with a high electrical conductivity. Based on the transparency of the device, the separated zones could be detected with a continuous-flow biochemical detection (BCD) system in the separation compartment using laser-induced fluorescence. The whole system was coupled on-line with HPLC for the bioanalysis of biotin in human urine. 9~ The same group developed an FFE device to remove the carrier ampholytes after capillary isoelectric focusing (CLEF) because they can interfere with subsequent electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). The online coupling of this CIEF/FFE system with ESI-MS was successfully realized for the model proteins myoglobin, carbonic anhydrase I, and/3-1actoglobulin 8 . 91 Researchers at Olympus Optical (Tokyo, Japan) developed a FFE bio-chip for rapid DNA sample preparation and protein separation. 7,92 The chip used two Pyrex glass wafers that were bonded together via an amorphous silicon layer with a separation chamber gap of 301am. The size of the whole chip was 100mm (diameter)x 2 mm (H), while the separation bed was 48 mm (W)x 40.5 mm (L)• 0.03 mm (H). Seven buffer inlets and one sample inlet were located at one end; six fraction outlets were located at the other end of the wafer stack. Two platinum electrodes were located at both edges parallel to the flow direction. A micro module fraction separator (MFS) was attached to the system to improve flow homogeny. To investigate the functionality of the module for DNA sample preparation, a mixture of genomic DNA, plasmid, and albumin was applied with 4 kV at a flow rate of 40 mm/s. Under these conditions, the actual separation time was just ls. In a second set of experiments, test proteins like cytochrome c and myoglobin were processed.

IV. APPLICATIONS A. General Considerations

FFE can be used for the separation of all kinds of charged compounds such as inorganic ions, low-molecular-weight organic substances, peptides, proteins, membranes, organelles, and cells. However, the IEF mode is particularly useful for amphoteric compounds, which means that it is almost exclusively used for the separation of proteins. It is possible to run native as well as denaturing separations, but as a general rule, the resolution in native media tends to be slightly better than in urea-containing media. In any case, a complex protein mixture should fractionate with the majority of individual proteins being detected in at most three consecutive wells out of 96 (for Octopus or Pro Team TM FFE instruments). A large number of proteins should separate into one or two wells. A few highly abundant proteins or proteins that tend to interact with surfaces or with other proteins might have broader distributions.

232

RJ.A. WEBER ec al.

The recovery of any particular sample depends highly on the amount of the sample. In principle, the absence of any matrix generally allows much higher recoveries as compared with other methods, but the (semi-) preparative dimensions of the instrument cause some losses due to sample adsorption on inner surfaces. When dealing with ml and mg amounts of sample and run times of more than 2 h, one can expect to have recoveries greater than 90%, if no precipitation occurs. When dealing with lal and lag amounts of sample or less, yields are less than 50%. Concentrated protein samples are diluted after FF-IEF by a factor of approximately 3. This is based on the following realistic assumptions: (i) the sample is injected into the separation chamber with a flow rate of I mL/h; (ii) the total flow rate of the separation media is approximately 60mL/h; and (iii) the flow rate of the counterflow adds an additional ---2/3 of the flow rate of the separation media based on the comparison of the inner diameter of the counterflow tube and the separation media tubes. This means that the total flow that reaches the 96-well plate is 100 mL/h, which is ~ 1 mL/well h. As mentioned previously, most of the proteins are focussed in up to three fractions, which means a collection rate of 3 mL/h for each recovered protein. Since the input sample flow rate is 1 mL/h this is a 3-fold dilution. Time requirements for all steps involved to clean, assemble, fill, calibrate, and check the performance of the instrument, including preparation of the sample and the separation media, are approximately 2-3 h for experienced users. The actual time needed for the application and fractionation of a sample highly depends on the sample amount, concentration, and solubility. The expression "run time" does not make sense in this context, because FF-IEF is a continuous technique in contrast to classical gel-based IEF or CE. The application of I mL of sample per hour containing I mg of protein serves as a good starting point for estimating run time. For soluble cytosolic protein mixtures this could easily be increased to 2-3 mL of sample per hour containing 10-20 mg of protein. Total application time is virtually unlimited based on the continuous fractionation principle. Washing time between the applications of different samples is about 30min and rinsing time at the end of operation is approximately 30 min.

B. FF-IEF of Proteins The following sections focus on the most recent publications in the field, because previous applications are covered by an excellent review. 2 Baldermann et al. 93 used an Octopus instrument for the determination of the isoelectric point of the membrane protein Omp21, because massive protein precipitation prevented experiments using traditional approaches. Lasch et al. 13 used FF-IEF for the purification of the enzyme aminopeptidase P. IEF of the enzyme, without loss of activity, would not

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

233

have been possible by classical IEF approaches like CE or gel-based IEF due to the instability of the enzyme at its pI. However, FF-IEF allowed the purification, because the addition of a histidine solution to the counterflow buffer guaranteed that the enzyme was exposed less than 1 min to destabilizing pH values around its acidic pI. Maida et al. 94 used an Octopus instrument for the identification of three different pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs) in olfactory sensilla of silkmoths. To achieve this, proteins from antennal branch homogenates of male A. polyphemus were fractionated by FF-IEF using an Ampholine gradient of pH 4.0-6.0. This permitted the separation of proteins with pI values differing by 0.03-0.05 units. The resulting fractions were analyzed by native PAGE and Western blot using the polyclonal antiserum against known PBPs. Subsequent analyses led to the identification of the three new PBPs. Bernardo et al. 95 reported the biochemical purification to apparent homogeneity of magnesium-dependent, plasma membrane-associated neutral sphingomyelinase (N-SMase) from bovine brain with the help of an Octopus instrument. Proteins from detergent extracts of brain membranes were subjected to four purification steps, the last of which being the FF-IEF run. This yielded an N-SMase preparation that exhibited a specific enzymatic activity 23,330-fold increased over the brain homogenate. On 2-D gel electrophoresis the purified enzymatic activity presented respectively two major protein species of 46 and 97 kDa apparent molecular mass. The combination of FF-IEF with SDS-PAGE of cytosolic proteins from the human colon carcinoma cell line LIM 1215 was presented as a non 2-D gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis strategy by the Simpson group. 8 The complex protein mixture was separated by native FF-IEF (pH range 3-10) with 96% recovery into 96 fractions, and each FFE fraction was further fractionated by SDS-PAGE. Selected protein bands were excised from the SDS-PAGE gel, digested in situ with trypsin, and subsequently identified by on-line RP-HPLC/electrosprayionization ion trap MS. C. Impact of FF-IEF in Proteomics The classical approach to comparing and characterizing complex protein mixtures like cell lysates relies on the combination of 2-DE and MS. Although this approach was used successfully in many studies, criticism has evolved from the fact that the dynamic range of 2-DE (~104) is not sufficient to study low-abundant proteins like cellular receptors and transcription factors in crude human cell protein extracts. The large concentration span of proteomes (106-101~ takes the 2-D electrophoretic approach to its very limits. A typical 2-D gel can take no more than 1 to 2 mg of protein, which inevitably leads to a "cut" of the

234

P.J.A.WEBER et al.

proteome: only the high-abundant proteins are visualized, due to the inability of current staining techniques to display the lowest abundance together with the highest abundance species on one gel. One of the most promising strategies for increasing the total number of proteins that can be detected from complex proteomes is sample prefractionation prior to 2-DE. The central intention of all existing prefractionation techniques is to separate crude protein samples into a small number of well-resolved fractions. Four major pre-fractionation approaches have been described: 9 cell fractionation by centrifugation 9 sequential extraction according to differences in protein solubility 9 chromatography (e.g., ion exchange, hydroxyapatite, and affinity resins) 9 liquid-phase electrophoresis techniques When using FFE for the prefractionation of complex protein samples the device is usually operated in the IEF mode thereby dividing the proteome into discrete pI ranges (Figure 13). To compensate for dilution during the FF run and to remove additives that are not compatible with further downstream analytical techniques like 2-DE or chromatographic separations, an appropriate sample cleanup

F I G U R E 13 2-D electrophoresis (pH 3-10) of a crude yeast protein sample (upper panel) and the same sample fractionated by FF-IEF (lower panel).

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

235

and concentration step should be considered. Ultrafiltration is a wellestablished method to process protein samples in the desired way. Ultrafiltration of the FFE fractions can be performed by filtration devices, equipped with 96 cavities. The 96 cavities are arranged in a 12x8 microtiterplate format and the volume of each cavity is about 2mL. Ultrafiltration membranes with different cutoffs, from 5 to 20 kDa are available. The FFE fractions can be collected into these devices prior ultrafiltration. FFE fractions with a volume of >2 mL can be transferred to single filtration devices and concentrated. Various filtration devices with volumes up to 25 mL are available. Ultrafiltration devices, manufactured by Vivascience, offer good recovery rates, even for membrane proteins. To take advantage of the continuous-operation mode of FF, a 96well on-line protein-binding device like a solid-phase-extraction (SPE) plate operated under vacuum conditions is also appropriate. The SPE plate may contain any type of resin that allows proteins to bind with high capacity such as butyl- (C4-), ion exchange, Hydrophilic interaction (poly-hydroxyethyl aspartamide), hydrophobic interaction or MC resins. The characteristics of the chosen downstream analytical techniques must be compatible with the elution conditions and thus define the resin type that may be used in the SPE plate. For the powerful combination of FFE and 2-DE or HPLC, sample cleanup by solid-phase extraction utilizing poly-(2-hydroxyethyl)-aspartamide (poly-HEA)silica is suited best since elution can be conducted in aqueous buffer solution. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) is a long-standing variant of normal-phase chromatography, which binds proteins to a strongly hydrophilic support based on interaction of hydrophilic parts of the proteins with the resin. The method and its basic principles have been extensively described. 96 Applications of HILIC include the isolation of membrane proteins, 97 glycopeptides, 98 and post-translationally modified protein variants. 99 In HILIC, binding occurs in highly concentrated organic solvents like acetonitrile or propanol, whereas elution is performed by flushing the resin with aqueous solutions such as 2-DE sample buffer or starting buffer for reversed-phase chromatography, which is usually 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Typically, samples from FFE experiments are diluted in a 10-fold excess of a high-organic content buffer to enable binding of the proteins to the resin. In this context, the counterflow is used to deliver the required amount of HILIC binding solution, thereby mixing the fractions with the binding solution directly at the site of fractionation (online sample processing). Figure 14 shows a prototype setup of such a processing device. The samples are dispensed automatically into a 96well microtiter plate filled with approximately 100 mg of poly-HEA silica resin per well. Figure 15 demonstrates the FFE-postprocessing power of HILIC applied to individual yeast fractions collected from a denaturing FF-IEF

236

P.J.A.WEBER et al.

FIGURE 15 FF-IEF 2-DE coupling. One fraction of an FF-IEF run with total yeast protein extract has been processed by HILIC sample concentration procedure. Left panel: 2-D gel (silver stained) of an individual FF-IEF fraction loaded without any further processing. Right panel:The same fraction after HILIC processing. Note that the loaded volumes were maintained equal in both experiments.

run. The left panel shows the result of 2-DE without prior sample processing by HILIC, whereas the right panel shows the result of the very same fraction after sample processing by HILIC followed by compatible elution in 2-DE sample buffer. Detailed qualitative and quantitative computer-aided image analysis of both processed and unprocessed FF

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

237

fractions, analyzed with 2-DE clearly indicates that no non-specific protein losses occurred during the HILIC manipulations. Moreover, the processed FF samples show clear protein enrichment while the overall quantitative proportions have been retained. The detection limits of 2-DE when combined with FF-IEF are further improved when HILIC processed fractions are separated on narrow-range pH gradients spanning 1 or 1.5 pH units in the first dimension of 2-DE. Approaching low-abundance proteins by increasing the protein load of crude, non-fractionated samples to 2-D gels, although narrow-range pH gradients are used is not sufficient, since resolution is quickly lost due to massive protein precipitation. On the other hand, by applying the protein fractions obtained by FF-IEF onto appropriate narrow-range IPG intervals, much higher sample loads can be used, since only the proteins co-focusing in the chosen pH gradient will be present (Figure 16). The experiment shown in Figure 17 shows the utility of HILIC sample processing in the context of FF-IEF HPLC coupling: the upper panel shows a reversed-phase chromatogram from a fraction that has been loaded directly onto the column, the lower panel shows the same fraction after HILIC sample processing. The concentration effect achieved by HILIC sample processing becomes evident by comparing the two chromatograms that were generated from identical fractions. After sample processing, the overall intensity together with the resolution of individual peaks is much more pronounced, in fact, if FF-IEF fractions are injected directly onto the column, no chromatographic peaks are discernible.

FIGURE 16 Rat liver proteins analyzed by 2-DE (pH 3.5-5.0): comparison of raw (left) and FFIEF fractionated liver sample (right).

238

PJ.A.WEBER

et al.

1200{ FF-IEF fraction, raw 1000-] 800-]
10

'1~2.5

1'5

~r5

ao

2a5

25

a75

ao

rain

a~5

1200t1000 ] FF-IEF fraction, HILIG processed x _ ~ i~ ~ 8001 ,a:: 600J

10

- 12.5

.

.

,

15

.

.

.

.

.

.

17.5

.

.

.

.

.

20

.

.

.

.

.

.

22.5

.

,

25

.

.

.

.

.

.

27.5

.

.

.

.

30

.

.

,

-

32.5

.

rain .

FIGURE 17 FF-IEF H P L C coupling.An FFE fraction was injected onto a Poros R2/10 (Applied Biosystems GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) polymeric reversed-phase column. The gradient solvents were: A, 0. 1% trifluoroacetic acid; B, solvent A plus 80% acetonitrile. The gradient was developed from 100% solvent A and 80% solvent B over 60 min with 214 nm recording displayed. Upper panel: chromatogram of a fraction injected directly onto the column. Lower panel: the same fraction after HILIC processing as described. Note that the same volumes (500 pL) were injected in both experiments.

These examples clearly demonstrate the value of combining HILIC and FF-IEF in enabling current proteomics technologies such as 2-DE or HPLC to display many more protein species than currently achievable without prefractionation.

D. Other FF-IEF Applications The only FF-IEF results, apart from protein separations, that were published recently were from the Vigh lab and deal with the separation of low-molecular-weight enantiomers like dansyl-tryptophan. 1~176176 These papers document the continuing efforts to optimize the purification of racemic mixtures based on their different interactions with enantiomerically pure additives like cyclodextrins.

E. Non-FF-IEF Applications FFE modes other than IEF are not within the scope of this chapter, but might be of interest to some readers. Since the latest review dates back to 1998, we compile some of the most recent references. This should enable the reader to get a complete overview of the possibilities of FFE.

10

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

239

The ZE mode was mainly applied for the separation of organelles and membranes. 1~ In addition, it was used for the isolation of a peptide, ~2 for the characterization and fractionation of cells, ~2,~3 and the separation of chiral compounds. 114-117 FF-ITP was used for the separation of humic acids and metal humates 118 as well as the separation of rare-earth EDTA chelates. 119 An FSE-ZE-mixed mode was used for the purification of a protein. 2~

V. SUMMARY Free-flow electrophoresis (FFE), also known as continuous free-film electrophoresis or continuous-flow electrophoresis (CFE) is one of the most versatile preparative-scale fractionation and separation techniques available in (bio)chemistry. FFE utilizes a thin film of separation buffer that flows continuously in a laminar fashion between two narrowly spaced plates and an electric field that is applied perpendicular to the flow. FFE results in a differential deflection of charged samples as they move toward the collection ports. This allows the high-throughput separation of all types of samples such as low-molecular-weight organic compounds, peptides, proteins, protein complexes, membranes, organelles, and whole cells. FFE supports all modes of electrophoresis such as zone electrophoresis (ZE), field-step electrophoresis (FSE), isotachophoresis (ITP), and isoelectric focusing (IEF). In this review, we focus on FF-IEF and attempt to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of its principles covering all relevant parameters, the historical, state of the art, and future instrumentation as well as the most recent applications. Wherever appropriate, we additionally include general information about FFE for completeness. Furthermore, we touch on related technologies such as multi-compartment electrolyzers (MCE) to allow their proper differentiation.

REFERENCES 1. Roman, M. C. and Brown, P. R. Free-flow electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 66(2):86-94, 1994. 2. Krivankova, L. and Bocek, P. Continuous free-flow electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19(7):1064-1074, 1998. 3. Bauer, J. Advances in cell separation: recent developments in counterflow centrifugal elutriation and continuous flow cell separation. J. Chromatogr. B 722(1-2):55-69, 1999. 4. Pasquali, C., Fialka, I. and Huber, L. A. Subcellular fractionation, electromigration analysis and mapping of organelles. J. Chromatogr. B 722:89-102, 1999. 5. Barrollier, J., Watzke, E. and Gibian, H. Einfache Apparatur ffir die tr~igerfreie pr~iparative Durchlauf-Elektrophorese. Z. Naturforschung. 13b:754-755, 1958.

~-4~

P.J.A.WEBER et al.

6. Hannig, K. Die tr~igerfreie kontinuierliche Elektrophorese und ihre Anwendung. Z Anal. Chem. 181:244-254, 1961. 7. Kobayashi, H. et al. Free-flow electrophoresis in a microfabricated chamber with a micromodule fraction separator. Continuous separation of proteins. J. Chromatogr. 990(1-2):169-78, 2003. 8. Hoffmann, P. et al. Continuous flee-flow electrophoresis separation of cytosolic proteins from the human colon carcinoma cell line LIM 1215: a non two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis strategy. Proteomics, 1(7):807-818, 2001. 9. Moseley, M. A. et al. Capillary zone electrophoresis-mass spectrometry using a coaxial continuous-flow fast atom bombardment interface. J. Chromatogr. 516(1): 167-173, 1990. 10. Hannig, K. and Heidrich, H. G. Free-flow electrophoresis. Darmstadt: GIT Verlag, 1990. 11. Kuhn, R. and Wagner, H. Free flow electrophoresis as a method for the purification of enzymes from E. coli cell extract. Electrophoresis 10(3):165-72, 1989. 12. Weber, G., Grimm, D. and Bauer, J. Application of binary buffer systems to free flow cell electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 21(2):325-328, 2000. 13. Lasch, J. et al. Aminopeptidase P--a cell surface antigen of endothelial and lymphoid cells: Catalytical and immuno-histotopical evidences. Biol. Chem. 379:705-709, 1998. 14. Wagner, H. Free-flow electrophoresis. Nature 341(6243):669-670, 1989. 15. Burggraf, D., Weber, G. and Lottspeich, F. Free flow-isoelectric focusing of human cellular lysates as sample preparation for protein analysis. Electrophoresis 16(6):1010-1015, 1995. 16. Hoffstetter-Kuhn, S., Kuhn, R. and Wagner, H. Free flow electrophoresis for the purification of proteins: I. Zone electrophoresis and isotachophoresis. Electrophoresis 11(4): 304-309, 1990. 17. Wagner, H. and Kessler, R. Free-flow field step focusing--a new method for preparative protein isolation. In Electrophoresis "82 (Stathakos, D. Ed.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 303-312, 1983. 18. Wagner, H. and Mang, V. Preparative free flow isotachophoresis. In Analytical and Preparative Isotachophoresis (Holloway, C. J. Ed.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 357-63, 1984. 19. Weber, G. and Bauer, J. Counterbalancing hydrodynamic sample distortion effects increases resolution of flee-flow zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 19(7):1104-1109, 1998. 20. Song, J.-F. et al. Application of free-flow electrophoresis to the purification of trichosanthin from a crude product of acetone fractional precipitation. Electrophoresis 19(7):1097-1103, 1998. 21. Bier, M., Ostrem, J. and Marquez, R. B. A new buffering system and its use in electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 14( 10): 1011-1018, 1993. 22. Weber, G. and Bocek, P. Recent developments in preparative free flow isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 19(10):1649-1653, 1998. 23. Rhodes, P. H., Snyder, R. S. and Roberts, G. O. Electrohydrodynamic distortion of sample streams in continuous-flow electrophoresis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 129(1):78-90, 1989. 24. Rhodes, P. H. et al. Electrohydrodynamic effects in continuous flow electrophoresis. Appl. Theor. Electrophoresis, 2(2-3):87-91, 1991. 25. Good, N. E. and Izawa, S. Hydrogen ion buffers. Methods Enzymol. 24:53-68, 1972. 26. Weber, G. and Bocek, P. Optimized continuous flow electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 17(12):1906-1910, 1996. 27. Righetti, P. G. et al. Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis. Proteomics 3(8): 1397-1407, 2003. 28. Rylatt, D. B. et al. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins across polyacrylamide membranes. J. Chromatogr A 865(1-2):145-153, 1999. 29. Gilbert, A., Evtushenko, M. and Nair, H. Purification of fibrinogen and virus removal using preparative electrophoresis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 936:625-629, 2001.

I0

FREE-FLOW ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

241

30. Locke, V. L. et al. Gradiflow as a prefractionation tool for two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2(9):1254-1260, 2002. 31. Rothemund, D. L., Thomas, T. M. and Rylatt, D. B. Purification of the basic protein avidin using Gradiflow technology. Protein. Expr. Purif. 26(1):149-152, 2002. 32. Thomas, T. M. et al. Preparative electrophoresis: a general method for the purification of polyclonal antibodies. J. Chromatogr. A 944(1-2):161-168, 2002. 33. Rothemund, D. L. et al. Depletion of the highly abundant protein albumin from human plasma using the Gradiflow. Proteomics 3(3):279-287, 2003. 34. Herbert, B. and Righetti, P. G. A turning point in proteome analysis: Sample prefractionation via multicompartment electrolyzers with isoelectric membranes. Electrophoresis 21:3639-3648, 2000. 35. Pedersen, S. K. et al. Unseen proteome: mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2(3):303-311, 2003. 36. Glukhovski, P., Landers, T. A. and Vigh, G. Preparative-scale isoelectric focusing separation of enantiomers using a multicompartment electrolyzer with isoelectric membranes. Electrophoresis 21(4):762-766, 2000. 37. Ros, A. et al. Protein purification by off-gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2(2): p. 151-156, 2002. 38. Michel, P. E. et al. Protein fractionation in a multicompartment device using off-gel isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 24:3-11, 2003. 39. Davidsson, P. et al. Proteome studies of human cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue using a preparative two-dimensional electrophoresis approach prior to mass spectrometry. Proteomics 1(3):444-452, 2001. 40. Davidsson, P. et al. Identification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluid using liquidphase isoelectric focusing as a prefractionation step followed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16(22):2083-2088, 2002. 41. Groleau, P. E. et al. Fractionation of beta-lactoglobulin tryptic peptides by ampholytefree isoelectric focusing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50(3):578-583, 2002. 42. Wall, D. B., Parus, S. J. and Lubman, D. M. Three-dimensional protein map according to pI, hydrophobicity and molecular mass. J. Chromatogr. B. 774(1):53-58, 2002. 43. Wang, H. et al. A protein molecular weight map of ES2 clear cell ovarian carcinoma cells using a two-dimensional liquid separations/mass mapping technique. Electrophoresis 23(18):3168-3181, 2002. 44. Gagne, J. P. et al. A proteomic approach to the identification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins as a new family of poly(ADP-ribose)-binding proteins. Biochem. J. 371(Pt 2):331-340, 2003. 45. Zuo, X. and Speicher, D. W. A method for global analysis of complex proteomes using sample prefractionation by solution isoelectrofocusing prior to two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 284(2):266-278, 2000. 46. Zuo, X. et al. Towards global analysis of mammalian proteomes using sample prefractionation prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels and using one-dimensional gels for insoluble and large proteins. Electrophoresis 22(9):1603-1615, 2001. 47. Zuo, X. and Speicher, D. W. Comprehensive analysis of complex proteomes using microscale solution isoelectric focusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2:58-68, 2002. 48. Dus, K., Sletten, K. and Kamen, M. D. Cytochrome c2 of Rhodospirillum rubrum. II. Complete amino acid sequence and phylogenetic relationships. J. Biol. Chem. 243(20):5507-5518, 1968. 49. Schally, A. V. et al. Growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF): physiological and biochemical studies with GRF preparations of bovine and porcine origin. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 148(2):372-388, 1968. 50. Herve, P. et al. [Application of free flow preparative methods for the separation of blood cells]. Rev. Fr. Transfus. Immunohematol. 18(4):439-455, 1975.

242

P.J.A. WEBER et al.

51. Sachs, G. et al. A nonelectrogenic H + pump in plasma membranes of hog stomach. J. Biol. Chem. 251(23):7690-7698, 1976. 52. Eckstein, R. et al. Der Einsatz eines tr~igerfreien Elektrophoresesystems (ACE 710) zur Fr~iherkennung einer positiven Reaktion in der gemischten Lymphozytenkultur. In Elektrophoreseforum "83, (Radola, B. J. Ed.) TU Miinchen, pp. 139-146, 1983. 53. Bauer, J. and Kachel, V. Separation accuracy of free flow electrophoresis as proved by flow cytometry. Electrophoresis 9(1):62-63, 1988. 54. Wenger, P. et al. Purification of lentil lectins using preparative electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. 455:225-239, 1988. 55. Rutte, R. Free-flow electrophoresis as a purification step of high versatility for bioproducts. Ber. Bunsen Phys. Chem. 93:1038-1042, 1989. 56. Harms, E., Kern, H. and Schneider, J. A. Human lysosomes can be purified from diploid skin fibroblasts by free-flow electrophoresis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77(10): 6139-6143, 1980. 57. Pesonen, M., Ansorge, W. and Simons, K. Transcytosis of the G protein of vesicular stomatitis virus after implantation into the apical plasma membrane of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. I. Involvement of endosomes and lysosomes. J. Cell. Biol. 99(3):796-782, 1984. 58. Marsh, M. et al. Rapid analytical and preparative isolation of functional endosomes by free flow electrophoresis. J. Cell. Biol. 104(4):875-886, 1987. 59. Bartles, J. R. et al. Biogenesis of the rat hepatocyte plasma membrane in vivo: comparison of the pathways taken by apical and basolateral proteins using subcellular fractionation. J. Cell. Biol. 105(3):1241-1251, 1987. 60. Nath, S. et al. Separation of enzymes from Candida boidinii crude extract by continuous flow zone electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 11(11):937-941, 1990. 61. Hannig, K., New aspects in preparative and analytical continuous free-flow cell electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 3:235-243, 1982. 62. Heidrich, H. G. Free-flow particle electrophoresis in cell biology and biochemistry--an updated review. In Electrophoresis "88, (Schafer-Nielson, C. Ed.) VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 187-200, 1988. 63. Wagner, H. and Heinrich, J. Free-Flow-Electrophoresis for the separation and purification of biopolymeres. In Modern methods in protein- and nucleic acid research, (Tschesche, H. Ed.) Walter de Gruyter Verlag, Berlin, NY. pp. 69-97, 1990. 64. Hannig, K. Eine Neuentwicklung der tr~igerfreien, kontinuierlichen Elektrophorese. Hoppe Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem. 338:211-227, 1964. 65. Fawcett, J. S., Continuous-flow isoelectric focusing and isotachophoresis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 209:112-126, 1973. 66. Just, W. W., Leon, V. J. and Werner, G. Isoelectric focusing in continuous-flow electrophoresis. I. Separation of mixed red blood cells of different species. Anal. Biochem. 67(2):590-601, 1975. 67. Wagner, H. and Speer, W. Kontinuierliche tr~igerfreie isoelektrische Fokussierung. J. Chromatogr. 157:259-265, 1978. 68. Kostka, G. and Hannig, K. Kontinuierliche pr~iparative Isofocussierung mit Hilfe der tr~igerfreien Electrophorese. In Elektrophoreseforum "85, (Radola, B. J. Ed.) TU Miinchen, pp. 349-352, 1985. 69. Bier, F. F. and Egen, N. B. Large-scale recycling electrofocusing. In Electrofocus/78, (Westerfield, J. G. Ed.) Elsevier, New York, 1979. 70. Bier, F. F. et al. New developments in isoelectric focusing. In Structure and Biological function, (Meierhofer, J. Ed.). Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, IL, USA, pp. 79-89, 1979. 71. Egen, N. B. et al. A new preparative isoelectric focusing device. In Electrophoresis '83, (Hirai, H. Ed.) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 547-550, 1984. 72. Righetti, P. G., Wenisch, E. and Faupel, M. Preparative Protein Purification in a Multicompartment Electrolyzer with Immobiline Membranes. J. Chromatogr. 475:293-309, 1989.

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

~-4

73. Morrison, D. R. Cell electrophoresis in microgravity: past and future. In Cell Electrophoresis (Bauer, J. Ed.) CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 283-313, 1994. 74. Hannig, K. and Bauer, J. Free flow electrophoresis in space shuttle program (Biotex). Adv. Space Res. 9(11):91-96, 1989. 75. Kobayashi, H., Ishii, N. and Nagaoka, S. Bioprocessing in microgravity: free flow electrophoresis of C. elegans DNA. J. Biotechnol. 47(2-3):367-376, 1996. 76. Clifton, M. J. et al. Purification of biological molecules by continuous flow electrophoresis in the Second International Microgravity Laboratory. J. Biotechnol. 47(2-3):341-352, 1996. 77. Hirokawa, T. et al. Free-flow isotachophoresis under micro-gravity. Biol. Sci. Space. 14(3):260-261, 2000. 78. Bauer, J. et al. Electrophoresis in space. Adv. Space Biol. Med. 7:163-212, 1999. 79. Kuellertz, G., Meyer, S. and Fischer, G. Differentiation by preparative continuous free flow-isoelectric focusing of cyclosporin A inhibitable peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase of human erythrocytes. Electrophoresis 15(7):960-967, 1994. 80. Bondy, B. et al. Sodium chloride in separation medium enhances cell compatibility of free flow electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 16(1):92-97, 1995. 81. Anderson, N. L. and Anderson, N. G. Proteome and proteomics: new technologies, new concepts, and new words. Electrophoresis, 19(11):1853-1861, 1998. 82. Righetti, P. G., Castagna, A. and Herbert, B. Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 73(11):320A-326A, 2001. 83. Poggel, M. and Melin, T. Free-flow zone electrophoresis: a novel approach and scaleup for preparative protein separation. Electrophoresis 22(6):1008-1015, 2001. 84. Raymond, D. E., Manz, A. and Widmer, H. M. Continuous sample pretreatment using a free-flow electrophoresis device onto a silicon chip. Anal. Chem. 66(18):2858-2865, 1994. 85. Raymond, D. E., Manz, A. and Widmer, H. M. Continuous separation of high molecular weight compounds using a microliter volume free-flow electrophoresis microstructure. Anal. Chem. 68(15):2515-2522, 1996. 86. Macounova, K., Cabrera, C. R. and Yager, P. Concentration and separation of proteins in microfluidic channels on the basis of transverse IEF. Anal. Chem. 73(7):1627-1633, 2001. 87. Macounova, K. et al. Generation of natural pH gradients in microfluidic channels for use in isoelectric focusing. Anal. Chem. 72(16):3745-3751, 2000. 88. Cabrera, C. R., Finlayson, B. and Yager, P. Formation of natural pH gradients in a microfluidic device under flow conditions: model and experimental validation. Anal. Chem. 73(3):658-666, 2001. 89. Cabrera, C. R. and Yager, P. Continuous concentration of bacteria in a microfluidic flow cell using electrokinetic techniques. Electrophoresis 22(2):355-362, 2001. 90. Mazereeuw, M. et al. Free flow electrophoresis device for continuous on-line separation in analytical systems. An application in biochemical detection. Anal. Chem. 72(16):3881-3886, 2000. 91. Chartogne, A., Tjaden, U. R. and Van der Greef, J. A free-flow electrophoresis chip device for interfacing capillary isoelectric focusing on-line with electrospray mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 14(14):1269-1274, 2000. 92. Shinohara, E. et al. Microfabricated free flow electrophoresis module for sample preparations. Anal. Sci. 17(Suppl.):i441-i443, 2001. 93. Baldermann, C. et al. The regulated outer membrane protein Omp21 from Comamonas acidovorans is identified as a member of a new family of eight-stranded beta-sheet proteins by its sequence properties. J. Bacteriol. 180(15):3741-3749, 1998. 94. Maida, R. et al. Three pheromone-binding proteins in olfactory sensilla of the two silkmoth species Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi. Eur. J. Biochem. 267(10):2899-2908, 2000. 95. Bernardo, K. et al. Purification and characterization of a magnesium-dependent neutral sphingomyelinase from bovine brain. J. Biol. Chem., 275(11):7641-7647, 2000.

7-44

P.J.A. WEBER et al.

96. Alpert, A. J. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J. Chromatogr. 499:177-196, 1990. 97. Jeno, P. et al. Desalting electroeluted proteins with hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 215(2):292-298, 1993. 98. Zhang, J. and Wang, D. I. Quantitative analysis and process monitoring of site-specific glycosylation microheterogeneity in recombinant human interferon-gamma from Chinese hamster ovary cell culture by hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Cbromatogr. B. 712(1-2):73-82, 1998. 99. Lindner, H. et al. Separation of acetylated core histones by hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 743(1):137-144, 1996. 100. Spanik, I. and Vigh, G. Effect of feed zone width on product purity in preparative-scale; continuous free-flow isoelectric focusing separation of enantiomers. J. Cbromatogr. A 979(1-2):123-129, 2002. 101. Spanik, I., Lim, P. and Vigh, G. Use of full-column imaging capillary isoelectric focusing for the rapid determination of the operating conditions in the preparative-scale continuous free-flow isoelectric focusing separation of enantiomers. J. Cbromatogr. A 960( 1-2):241-246, 2002. 102. Lurin, C. et al. CLC-Ntl, a putative chloride channel protein of tobacco, co-localizes with mitochondrial membrane markers. Biochem. J. 348.291-295, 2000. 103. Martinec, J. et al. Subcellular localization of a high affinity binding site for D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate from Chenopodium rubrum. Plant Physiol, 124(1):475-483, 2000. 104. Kang, T. et al. Subcellular distribution and cytokine- and chemokine-regulated secretion of leukolysin/MT6-MMP/MMP-25 in neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 276(24):21960-21968 2001. 105. Kushimoto, T. et al. A model for melanosome biogenesis based on the purification and analysis of early melanosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98(19):10698-10703, 2001. 106. Thery, C. et al. Proteomic analysis of dendritic cell-derived exosomes: a secreted subcellular compartment distinct from apoptotic vesicles. J. Immunol. 166(12):7309-7318 2001. 107. Bard, F. et al. Molecular complexes that contain both c-Cbl and c-Src associate with Golgi membranes. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 81(1):26-35, 2002. 108. Ellinger, I. et al. Different temperature sensitivity of endosomes involved in transport to lysosomes and transcytosis in rat hepatocytes: analysis by free-flow electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 23( 13):2117-2129, 2002. 109. Mohr, H. and Voelkl, A. Isolation of peroxisomal subpopulations from mouse liver by immune flee-flow electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 23( 13 ):2130-2137, 2002. 110. Reintanz, B. et al. AtKC1, a silent Arabidopsis potassium channel alpha -subunit modulates root hair K + influx. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(6):4079-4084, 2002. 111. Zischka, H. et al. Improved proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria by free-flow electrophoresis. Proteomics 3(6):906-916, 2003. 112. Hymer, W. C. et al. Mammalian pituitary growth hormone: applications of free flow electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 21 (2):311-317, 2000. 113. 'Schoenberger, J. et al. Establishment and characterization of the follicular thyroid carcinoma cell line ML-1. J. Mol. Med. 78:102-110, 2001. 114. Stalcup, A. M. et al. Continuous free flow electrophoresis for preparative chiral separations of piperoxan using sulfated beta-cyclodextrin. Analyst 125(10):1719-1724, 2001. 115. Wind, M. et al. Chiral capillary electrophoresis as predictor for separation of drug enantiomers in continuous flow zone electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 895(1-2):51-65, 2000. 116. Schneiderman, E., Gratz, S. R. and Stalcup, A. M. Optimization of preparative electrophoretic chiral separation of ritalin enantiomers. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 27(3-4):639-650, 2002.

10

FREE-FLOWISOELECTRIC FOCUSING

'24

117. Gratz, S. R. et al. Use of dyes to investigate migration of the chiral selector in CFFE and the impact on the chiral separations. Anal. Chem. 73(16):3999-4005, 2001. 118. Keuth, U. et al. Separation and characterization of humic acids and metal humates by electrophoretic methods. Electrophoresis 19(7):1091-1096, 1998. 119. Hirokawa, T. et al. Isotachophoretic separation behavior of rare-earth EDTA chelates and analysis of minor rare-earth elements in an iron ore by bidirectional isotachophoresis-particle-induced X-ray emission. ]. Chromatogr. A 919(2):417-426, 2001.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

II ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS M E L A N I E YoW H I T E A N D S T U A R T J. C O R D W E L L

Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Level 4, Building F7B, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109 Australia

I. INTRODUCTION A. Problems in Proteomics and How to Solve Them II. THE PROTEOMICSWORKFLOW III. IEF FOR PREFRACTIONATION A. Prefractionation of Organelles B. Prefractionating Devices IV. IEF IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTROPHORESIS A. Alkaline Proteins B. Low Abundance Proteins and Micro-range "Zoom" IPG 2-DE C. High and Low Molecular Mass Proteins V. CONCLUSIONS GLOSSARY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Proteomics has many broad definitions, but the simplest may refer to scale. 'Proteomics' can be defined as the ability to conduct high-throughput biochemistry or protein chemistry on a scale comparable with that achieved by molecular biology and its high-throughput counterpart, genomics. The advent of proteomics in the mid-1990s was made possible by a number of technical advancements for separating and identifying proteins, not the least of which was the sensitivity and automation capability of various mass spectrometry (MS) technologies. However, all of the original techniques used for the separation of single unique proteins from complex mixtures relied on isoelectric focusing fIEF) as a preliminary step, especially in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) applications. In the 10 years since the coining of the term proteome, ~,2 IEF has become 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

247

248

N.Y. WHITE AND S.J. CORDWELL

more than just a tool utilized in 2-DE, and is now a recognized 'lynchpin' in the proteomics process. Researchers have begun to understand the value in high-resolution prefractionation steps of examining fractions with particular qualities, such as subcellular localization, prior to either 2-DE or 2-D liquid chromatography (2-DLC) for protein and peptide separation. IEF plays a central role prior to either of these applications: for example, for the separation and purification of organelles, the enrichment of high-and low-molecular mass alkaline or hydrophobic proteins, or as one of the several prefractionating devices used to enrich proteins within a given pH range and compatible with micro-range (single pH unit) 2-D gels. This chapter will deal with the proteomics aspect of IEF, focusing on its role in the prefractionation of biological samples and as the preliminary step in 2-DE, with an emphasis on reviewing most recent developments.

A. Problems in Proteomics and How to Solve Them

Currently, two main methods exist for the separation of proteins in proteomics projects: (i) 2-DE and (ii) 2-DLC. This chapter will concentrate on 2-DE technology; however, many of the IEF-based prefractionating devices now available are suitable for use with 2-DLC applications, and furthermore, many of the inherent problems associated with 2-DE also pertain to 2-DLC~for example, an inability to solubilize highly hydrophobic proteins. Despite these recent advances in alternative technologies, including multi-dimensional chromatography 3 and isotopecoded affinity tags 4 combined with MS, 2-DE remains the method of choice for performing high-resolution separation 5 of complex protein mixtures. 5,6 This is because 2-DE is capable of simultaneously resolving between 3000 and 10,000 protein species, and is the only method suitable for visualizing and purifying protein 'isoforms,' namely those protein species containing post-translational modifications (PTM) that subtly alter the molecular mass (Mr) and isoelectric point (pI) of a predicted protein. Furthermore, 2-DE remains a preferred technology for most laboratories because of the relatively low cost of its equipment in comparison with that of other separation methods. Scientifically, several studies have shown that an approach utilizing the power of both 2-DE and 2-DLC results in the best possible proteome coverage. 7 In recent times, the resolving power of 2-DE has been further enhanced by improved methodology for biological sample preparation as well as incremental improvements in 2-DE technology, including micro-range (1.0-1.5 pH units) immobilized pH gradients (IPG), 8-1~ better fluorescent dyes, aa and more reproducible precast second dimension sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels. Despite these improvements, several drawbacks with 2-DE still remain. We are only seeing the "tip of the proteome iceberg ''12 due to the

II

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING A N D PROTEOMICS

249

underrepresentation of: (i) hydrophobic or membrane-associated proteins; (ii) highly alkaline proteins; (iii) high- and low-molecular-mass proteins; and (iv) lower-abundance proteins due to the relative insensitivity of available stains and the dominance of high-abundance "housekeeping" proteins. This is especially apparent in samples where one or two individual protein species account for a significant fraction of the total protein present (e.g., albumin in human plasma). One successful method for overcoming these limitations has been achieved by taking a subproteomics approach. 8 This can be performed by prefractionation to purify a subcellular compartment or organelle, 13,14 or by using the physical, chemical, or functional properties of a protein or class of proteins to enrich a particular subset prior to 2-DE or 2-DLC. Such an approach serves two purposes: (i) the group of proteins associated with a given subcellular fraction or organelle can be studied with relative specificity and (ii) the overall complexity of the 2-DE pattern is reduced when compared with whole-cell preparations, making it possible to visualize more lower abundance proteins. II. THE PROTEOMICS WORKFLOW

Proteomics is generally applied to questions of biological significance, and hence the experimental design is aimed at finding biomarkers, irrespective of whether they be they diagnostic of disease, quality in agricultural crops, or pathogenicity factors in infectious disease. The aim is to determine, among a complex variety of unique proteins, those that are associated with performing a particular biological process. Therefore, the goal of any proteomics researcher must be to maximize the amount of the functional proteome that can be viewed at any given point in time, or to prefractionate samples such that an increasingly specific subset of the functional proteome most relevant to the biological process under investigation is purified. The proteomics "workflow" (Figure 1) therefore begins with the prefractionation of complex samples based on physical (e.g., pI or Mr) , chemical (e.g., PTM), or functional (e.g., ligand- or protein-binding) properties, or upon subcellular localization (e.g., membrane, extracellular, nuclear, and mitochondrial proteins). These methods use selective, sequential solubilization is or the generation of relatively pure subcellular fractions as well as an increasing array of chromatographic approaches for the enrichment of proteins with a selectable property. ~6-~8 Essentially, sequential solubilization fractionates whole cell or tissue by removing highly hydrophilic proteins generally associated with the cytosol before attempting to extract proteins from previously insoluble material, using progressively more "aggressive" solubilization buffers (Figure 2). The resulting 2-DE patterns from these experiments share a degree of similarity, yet also show the enrichment of

250

M.u WHITE AND S.J.CORDWELL I BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE I

r

I PFIE'FFIACTIONATION I I pll

I

MASS I IAFFINITY PROPEFITIESllSOLUBILITY

I

IlSUB-CELLULAFILOCATIONII PTM

I

I PROTEIN SEPARATIONI I

2-OE I I

I

I

I

-OLC r I

I PFIOTEINS-OF-INTEFIESTJ

I

I IDENTIFICATION/MS I i

IPEPTIDE MASS MAPPINGI

I

i

I PEPTIDE SEQUENCING I

IPTM CHARACTERIZATIONI FIGURE Biological image or identified

I Schematic representation of a 'typical' proteomics experiment. samples are prefractionated, separated using 2-DE or 2-DLC, subjected to informatics analysis to determine proteins-of-interest , which are then and further characterized by MS.

FIGURE 2 Subcellular fractionation of proteins from rabbit myocardium. Comparison of (a) whole tissue proteins, (b) hydrophiUc or cytosolic proteins and (c) purified membrane proteins.

hydrophobic proteins in the later fractions. Clearly, this is dependent on the sample type, and as yet, no group has conducted a large-scale identification project to determine the degree of protein "carry-over" between fractions, i.e., what level of enrichment can actually be achieved for a given sample type.

II

ISOELECTRICFOCUSING AND PROTEONICS

25 I

Organellar fractionation prior to sample solubilization has been utilized for membrane-specific proteins, as well as nuclear, mitochondrial, and several other sub-cellular fractions, using a variety of biochemical extraction techniques prior to 2-DE or 2oDLC. The most important element in these types of approaches is that the subcellular fraction must be close to true purity or abundant contaminants from other fractions will interfere. Subcellular proteomics has been performed on fractions containing the nucleus, ~9 mitochondria, 2~ and prokaryotic and eukaryotic membranes. 23-26 Furthermore, a range of commercial kits are now available that standardize many of these methods. Such extractions have different degrees of success depending on the sample type. For example, proteins from the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria can be isolated almost to purity; proteins from mammalian plasma membranes, however, will more likely be significantly enriched, but not to absolute purity. Again, no studies have been performed to ascertain the level of enrichment for more than a single sample type. Although not strictly relevant to the current chapter, the chromatographic approach to sample prefractionation has a vast degree of potential for proteomics applications and is reviewed in Righetti et al. TM and Lee and LeeF Affinity chromatography has several applications including: (i) the removal of abundant proteins, especially serum albumin from plasma 28,29 or cerebrospinal fluid, 3~ which reduce the separating capacity of 2-DE; (ii) the concentration of protein samples; (iii) the selective binding of proteins with a selectable property (e.g., phosphoproteins and metal-binding proteins using immobilized metal-affinity chromatography, IMAC, 31 or various ligand-binding proteins such as those that bind ATP32 or calcium33); and (iv) the study of protein complexes. Many of these approaches have applications in "peptidomics," or in the selective purification of a particular modified peptide prior to mass spectrometric analysis. Whole cell or tissue extracts, or prefractionated protein samples, are then separated by SDS-PAGE, 2-DE, or 2-DLC prior to the identification of the purified components by MS. The choice of separation technology greatly depends on the complexity of the sample. While whole protein mixtures can be separated using 2-DE, SDS-PAGE may be suitable for purified protein complexes, and 2-DLC of complex mixtures is utilized following proteolytic digestion to create a peptide mix that can be separated by LC. Peptides derived from isolated gel spots and bands, or purified via 2-DLC, are then used to identify the proteins by a variety of MS techniques (reviewed in Reference 34). The final step in the traditional proteomics process is to characterize the nature of protein PTMs. While this is not the focus of the current review, IEF-based 2-DE is currently the best method for viewing modified proteins. A variety of novel staining techniques, specific for phosphoproteins 35,36 and glycoproteins, 37 are now available, making the determination of PTM-containing proteins more efficient.

252

M.u WHITE AND SoJ.CORDWELL

III. IEF FOR PREFRACTIONATION IEF is making a significant contribution to prefractionating proteins prior to conventional separation (2-DE and 2-DLC approaches), and to protein identification and characterization (mainly performed using MS). There are two main approaches where IEF has made an impact on prefractionation: (i) the separation of subcellular fractions and organelles and (ii) the separation of proteins into pI fractions suitable for use with micro-range IPG or 2-DLC-MS, thus aiding in the identification of lower abundance proteins. Each of these approaches are leading to a more improved resolution and proteome "coverage" than that can be achieved with currently available conventional technology.

A. Prefractionation of Organelles As mentioned previously, subcellular fractionation is an important means of improving the information that can be acquired using proteomics technologies. Subcellular fractionation is often performed using density-gradient centrifugation, differential extraction, or other biochemical methods. In recent times, these methods have been supplemented by using IEF to further enrich proteins from a particular organelle. Zischka et al. 38 utilized a flee-flow electrophoresis (FFE) device to purify further mitochondria from Saccharomyces cerevisiae following density-gradient ultracentrifugation. In this particular study, only 2 % of the identified proteins were known to be non-mitochondrial in comparison with the 16% of non-mitochondrial proteins identified when only the centrifugation step was performed. Furthermore, 43 mitochondrial proteins were identified only in the centrifugation-FFE fractions. This method clearly has substantial potential for providing very pure organellar fractions prior to 2-DE.

B. Prefractionating Devices Several commercial prefractionating devices now exist for the separation of complex protein mixtures prior to 2-DE or 2-DLC and subsequent to MS identification and characterization of the individual purified components. The methods based on IEF include the Gradiflow (Gradipore), Rotofor (Bio-Rad), FFE (Tecan), and multicompartment electrolyzers (Proteome Systems, Invitrogen). Rotofor is a liquid-phase IEF-based prefractionation device that separates proteins in free solution using the buffering capability of carrier ampholytes (CA) to create a linear pH gradient. Proteins are fractionated into sample chambers (typically 20) separated by permeable screens, the resulting fractions are collected, and CA are removed, prior to 2-DE o r 2 - D L C . 39 This approach has been used to separate further proteins from cerebrospinal fluid 4~ and ovarian

II

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS

~-5

carcinoma cells. 42 Recent work has modified the Rotofor to perform liquid-phase IEF in the absence of CA by employing polyacrylamide membranes with embedded Immobilines. 43 Gradiflow is a preparative electrophoresis apparatus that incorporates a membrane-based separation using thin polyacrylamide membranes with variable pore sizes to allow both size- and charge-based separations. 44 Essentially two fractions can be achieved, and then further rounds of purification are possible on these fractions. As such it is a simple device for removing abundant proteins including serum albumin, 4s prefractionating complex mixtures prior to micro-range 2-DE, 46,47 and for the analysis of proteins incompatible with 2-DE, for example, basic proteins. 48 For compatibility with micro-range IPG 2-DE, Gradiflow may not be ideal as only 2 pI fractions can be achieved in a single run. Here multicompartment devices 49-51 may be more suitable. These devices are based on isoelectric membranes using immobiline technology and have several distinct advantages, including their downstream compatibility with IPG-2-DE without further sample cleanup or removal of CA, reduced sample precipitation, and the flexibility to create membranes specific for the removal of a given protein or protein fraction. These advantages are well documented in Reference 18. The MCE has recently been applied to the separation of yeast cell lysates 12 with excellent results, including the separation and identification of membrane-associated and lower abundance proteins. Similar technology utilizing thin immobiline-containing polyacrylamide membranes has been developed by Zuo and Speicher s2,s3 and has been used to detect low abundance and other "difficult" proteins in human breast cancer, s4 This device has been used to perform prefractionation based on pI prior to micro-range IPG 2-DE with compatible fractions for minimal sample "cross-over" between IPGs, hence providing improved quantitation, ss These authors have also been capable of separating prefractionated proteins using 0.5 pH unit fractions in conjunction with single pH unit IPGs, although there is obviously an opportunity to use even narrower IPG pH ranges, especially in those areas where substantial numbers of expressed proteins are usually found (e.g., pH range between 4.5 and 5.5). This principle is also found in G6rg et al., s6 where Sephadex IEF is performed as a "third" dimension prior to IPG-2-DE. The advantage of this system is its simplicity, as the proteins are treated with sample buffers identical to those used in IPG 2-DE, and the resulting Sephadex fractions are simply cut with a scalpel and applied to the IPG strip. Unfortunately, for proteome-wide coverage using 2-DE, increased numbers of fractions (including isoelectric and subcellular fractionation or a combination of both) mean that a potentially vast number of gels must be run to provide real coverage rather than just a proteome "snapshot." This fact combined with the substantial and necessary number of replicates that must be run to provide meaningful statistical analyses means that such an approach is only viable for very few laboratories. Finally, a concerted

254

N.Y. WHITE AND S.J. CORDWELL

attempt to use this type of combined approach to generate significant data has yet to be shown as viable for any biological problem. IV. IEF IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTROPHORESIS

IEF of proteins is the technology that has allowed two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to become the key methodology for protein separation and the purification of individual components from complex mixtures, s7 Two methods exist for this process: first, the separation of proteins in capillary rod-gels where the acrylamide gel matrix contains CA molecules which are "prefocused" to create the pH gradient (reviewed in Reference 58); and secondly IPG technology that utilizes well-characterized acrylamido buffers to create a stable pH gradient in a thin acrylamide strip (reviewed in Reference 5). The CA method suffers from several drawbacks, including an inability to load preparative amounts of sample, reproducibility problems associated with batch-to-batch variations of CA preparations, difficulties in pouring and handling the resulting IEF gels, and cathodic drift caused by the destabilization of the pH gradient at alkaline pH. Despite these limitations, several outstanding research groups have generated a wealth of proteomic data using CA-dependent IEF in the first dimension of 2-DE including those of Celis,s9-61 VanBogelen, 62,63and Hecker. 64,6s IPG technology revolutionized 2-DE and was an important factor, along with the advent of sensitive, high-throughput MALDI-TOF and ESI-MS, behind the proliferation of proteomics studies, s IPG IEF in the first dimension of 2-DE has allowed for better reproducibility both runto-run and between laboratories following standard procedures with commercially available reagents and precast IPG strips, 66,67 higher loading capacity and in-gel rehydration of protein samples, and improved ease of use. IPG strips are also commercially available from a number of vendors in a wide variety of pH gradients ranging from very wide (pH 4-12 and 3-10), medium (pH 3-6, 4-7, 5-8, 7-10, 6-9, 6-11, etc.) to micro-range (single pH unit), and in a variety of strip lengths suitable for either high resolution (17, 18, 24, and 30cm) or rapid analysis (7 and 11 cm) proteomics applications. As mentioned previously, despite these advances, several problems remain with 2-DE technology for high-resolution proteomics applications. The final sections of this chapter deal with how modifications to IEF-based prefractionation and IPG IEF can be applied to overcome some of these limitations. A. Alkaline Proteins

One of the main problems traditionally associated with 2-DE is its inability to reproducibly array highly alkaline proteins (pI > 9). These can

II

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS

255

be lost due to cathodic drift during CA IEF, or the lack of suitable buffering molecules at highly alkaline pH. 68 Prior to the advent of IPG technology, non-equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis (NEPHGE)was utilized to provide the separation of basic proteins. 69 IPG IEF is possible in the basic pH range, even up to a pI of 12.0. s,68,7~The separation of alkaline proteins is challenging for several reasons: (i) active water transport toward the anode (reverse electroendosmosis) caused by the strong positive charge of basic acrylamido buffers; (ii) the hydrolysis of acrylamide to acrylic acid at alkaline pH; and (iii) the migration of reducing agents, mainly dithiothreitol (DTT), leading to reduced gel quality ("streaky" 2-DE patterns) and diminished reproducibility. In an attempt to overcome these limitations, some special precautions must be taken to ensure quality separations: (i) proteins must be cup-loaded at the anode, especially where prior isoelectric prefractionation has not occurred; (ii) samples may be treated with hydroxyethyl disulfide allowing oxidation of thiol groups in disulfide containing proteins; 71 (iii) dimethylacrylamide (DMA 68) or N-acryloylaminoethoxyethanol (AAEE 72) may be used instead of acrylamide since these matrices have been shown to resist alkaline hydrolysis at basic pH; (iv) non-ionic reducing agents such as tributylphosphine (TBP) can be used to replace DTT, 73 thus minimizing the transport of reducing agent out of the IPG during IEF; and (v) isopropanol or glycerol can be added to sample buffers to reduce the electroendosmotic effects. 73 Despite these improvements, high-quality protein separations at very alkaline pH values using 2-DE remain rare. In one recent study, a concerted attempt was made to characterize highly alkaline proteins in the bacterium Helicobacter pylori. 48 This study utilized the Gradiflow prefractionation device to examine 2-DEincompatible proteins and compare them with separations using pH 6-11 and 9-12 IPGs. H. pylori is an excellent model for this type of work since it contains a higher proportion of alkaline proteins than acidic ones (Figure 3). Prefractionation allowed a collection of proteins with pI> 9.0 to be collected and analysed using SDS-PAGE and LCMS/MS to reveal novel protein species that could not be detected using 2-DE. Another group determined that subcellular fractions taken from rat liver were enriched for proteins with different pI properties as well (e.g., mitochondrial extracts were enriched for basic proteins). TM While this study was performed with 2-DLC/MS-MS, very few groups have combined isoelectric prefractionation with this separation and identification strategy.

B. Low Abundance Proteins and Micro-range "Zoom" IPG 2-DE 2-DE currently fails to resolve many lower abundance proteins for two major reasons: (i) the "dynamic range" of protein abundances in most cells and tissues is too wide to accommodate a good focusing of

256

N.Y. WHITE AND S.J. CORDWELL

F I G U R E 3 2-DE gels using pH 5-8 (a) and pH 6-11 (b) IPG IEF separation of H. pylori whole cell proteins.

abundant proteins while resolving lower abundance proteins and (ii) the limit of detection of currently available fluorescent and visible stains. One method used to overcome these limitations is to utilize affinity or other methods for the removal of abundant proteins. Such methods have been mainly applied to human serum for the removal of serum albumin, immunoglobulins, serotransferrin, etc., thus enabling the detection of lower abundance biomarkers. 28,29However, many of these methods result in the removal of non-targeted proteins and hence reduce the quantity of lower abundance or bound proteins as well. Isoelectric preffactionating devices have also been used for abundant protein removal, by restricting the pI of the separation to remove only a single major constituent. 4s For applications using 2-DE, many groups have begun to utilize micro-range, or "zoom" IPG strips (1 pH unit), either alone or in conjunction with compatibly preffactionated samples. The use of microrange IPGs serves two purposes: first, to increase the separating area versus pH range ratio of the IEF dimension, and second, to allow a higher concentration of protein sample to be applied to the IPG (Figure 4). This results in the ability to visualize more low abundance proteins. Furthermore, the effect is further increased when isoelectrically preffactionated samples are applied to the micro-range IPG. This is a simple loading effect, for example, 1 mg of complex mixture applied to a microrange gel in the range of pH 4-5 may result in the separation of effectively 500-750ng of proteins with pI between 4 and 5. Where IEF preffactionation is performed, several mg of complex protein mixture might be preffactionated such that exactly 1 mg of protein with pI between 4 and 5 is applied to the compatible IPG strip. This also results in less sample buildup at the IPG extremes that might result in less efficient focusing. Several studies have examined the utility of micro-range

II

ISOELECTRICFOCUSINGAND PROTEOMICS

FIGURE 4

257

2-DE gels utilizing micro-range (I.0 pH unit) IPG IEF. Rabbit myocardium whole

tissue proteins separated on (a) pH 3-10; (b) pH 3.9-5.1; (c) pH 4.7-5.9; and (d) pH 5.5-6.7 IPGs.

IPG 2-DE both alone and in conjunction with other prefractionation techniques including subcellular fractionation or differential solubility, and isoelectric fractionation as described above, s,8,x~ One disadvantage of the creation of "composite" 2-DE preparations comprised of several parallel, overlapping narrow-range IPG 2-DE gels is that a substantial amount of work is required to produce 4 or 5 gels per sample, rather than only 1 or 2. This combined with the use of subcellular prefractionation, and the required number of replicates necessary for meaningful statistical analyses, which mean that only a handful of laboratories are capable of conducting the research. The most useful applications for these IPG 2-DE gels appears to be in utilizing microranges to provide the requisite separation of protein isoforms for mass spectrometric characterization of PTM (Figure 5). 7s

C. High and Low Molecular Mass Proteins Another significant problem associated with 2-DE is the underrepresentation of high- and low-molecular-mass proteins and peptides. These problems occur due to the relative acrylamide pore size separation of

258

M.u WHITE AND S.J. CORDWELL

FIGURE 5 2-DE gels of separated proteins from rabbit myocardium showing enhanced resolution of protein isoforms utilizing micro-range (I.0 pH unit) IPGs: (a) myosin light chain 2, (b) tropomyosin; (c) myosin light chain I, and (d) troponin T.

both the first-dimension IPG strip, and the % T (monomer) gradient used in the SDS-PAGE dimension. The IPG strip pore size is 4% T in commercially available strips, which excludes higher mass proteins >120-150kDa. Recent work has attempted to improve the recovery of these proteins using lower % T IPG strips in the IEF dimension, to as low as 3%T. 76,77 This has a two-fold effect: to improve the total amount of protein that enters the strip in the first dimension (either following cuploading or in-gel rehydration), and also to increase the proportion of larger proteins on the ensuing 2-DE gels. This second effect is only possible if compatible %T SDS-PAGE gels are incorporated in the second dimension. Another group has utilized agarose gels in the IEF dimension to improve the separation of high-molecular mass proteins. 78 Lower molecular mass proteins (i.e., <10 kDa) are typically resolved using a Tristricine SDS-PAGE system. 79 This simple modification of the 2-DE procedure has allowed for varying studies of low mass proteins and peptides including those from amyloid brain plaques, 8~ Haemopbilus influenzae 81 and Escbericbia coli. 82 Prefractionation, using both isoelectric and size-exclusion type methods, has also been successfully utilized for the analysis of both highand low-mass proteins. Gradiflow uses both size- and charge-based

II

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS

259

fractionation, i.e., fractions with a molecular mass cutoff of > 100 or 200 kDa, or <5 kDa can be achieved easily. The proteins within the fractions can then be precipitated and analysed by either SDS-PAGE or 2-DLC MS, because the fractions are incompatible with 2-DE. Another preparative electrophoresis device is the PrepCell (Bio-Rad), which allows for the collection of molecular mass fractions compatible with SDS-PAGE, 2-DE or 2-DLC separations. This has been used to characterize high-and low-abundance proteins from rat liver and brain cytosol.83,84 V. CONCLUSIONS

IEF remains an integral part of proteome analysis. It is central to the most commonly performed protein separation technique utilized in proteomics (2-DE), and in recent times has become essential for protein prefractionation prior to 2-DE, or other, separation techniques. As such it is a crucial element in allowing proteomics to access more than just the most abundant and readily solubilized proteins, and hence is a pre-requisite for the proteomic deep drilling of even the simplest of organisms. GLOSSARY

2-DE Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. 2-DLC Two-dimensional liquid chromatography. CA Carrier ampholytes. FFE Free-flow electrophoresis. IEF Isoelectric focusing. IPG Immobilized pH gradient. MCE Multi-compartment electrolyzer. MS Mass spectrometry. NEPHGE Non-equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis. PTM Post-translational modification. SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was facilitated by access to the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF) funded under the Australian government Major National Research Facility (MNRF) program. Bio-Rad Laboratories and the National Heart Foundation of Australia are thanked for funding. MYW is the recipient of an APAF-Bio-Rad Postgraduate Award.

260

M.Y. WHITE AND S.J. CORDWELL

REFERENCES 1. Wasinger, V. C., Cordwell, S. J., Cerpa-Poljak, A., Yan, J. X., Gooley, A. A., Wilkins, M. R., Duncan, M. W., Harris, R., Williams, K. L. and Humphery-Smith, I. Progress with gene-product mapping the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium. Electrophoresis 16:1090-1094, 1995. 2. Wilkins, M. R., Pasquali, C., Appel, R. D., Ou, K., Golaz, O., Sanchez, J.-C., Yan, J. X., Gooley, A. A., Hughes, G., Humphery-Smith, I., Williams, K. L. and Hochstrasser, D. E From proteins to proteomes: large-scale protein identification by two-dimensional electrophoresis and amino acid analysis. Biotechnology 14:61-65, 1996. 3. Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D. and Yates, J. R. III. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19: 242-247, 2001. 4. Gygi, S. E, Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, E, Gelb, M. H. and Aebersold, R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17:994-999, 1999. 5. G6rg A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Harder, A., Schiebe, B., Wildgruber, R. and Weiss, W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:1037-1053, 2000. 6. Rabilloud, T. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains. Proteomics 2:3-10, 2002. 7. Koller, A., Washburn, M. P., Lange, B. M., Andon, N. L., Deciu, C., Haynes, P. A., Hays, L., Schlietz, D., Ulaszek, R., Wei, J., Wolters, D. and Yates, J. R. III. Proteomic survey of metabolic pathways in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11969-11974, 2002. 8. Cordwell, S. J., Nouwens, A. S., Verrills, N. M., Basseal, D. J. and Walsh, B. J. Subproteomics based upon protein cellular location and relative solubilities in conjunction with composite two-dimensional electrophoresis gels. Electrophoresis 21:1094-1103, 2000. 9. Wildgruber, R., Harder, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Weiss, W., Fey, S. J., Larsen, P. M. and G6rg, A. Towards higher resolution: two-dimensional electrophoresis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins using overlapping narrow immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:2610-2616, 2000. 10. Westbrook, J. A., Yan, J. X., Wait, R., Welson, S. Y. and Dunn, M. J. Zooming-in on the proteome: very narrow-range immobilised pH gradients reveal more protein species and isoforms. Electrophoresis 22:2865-2871, 2001. 11. Patton, W. E Detection technologies in proteome analysis. J. Chromatogr. B. 771:3-31, 2002. 12. Pedersen, S. K., Harry, J. L., Sebastian, L., Baker, J., Traini, M. D., McCarthy, J. T., Manoharan, A., Wilkins, M. R., Gooley, A. A., Righetti, P. G., Packer, N. H., Williams, K. L. and Herbert, B. R. Unseen proteome: mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2:303-311, 2003. 13. Brunet, S., Thibault, P., Gagnon, E., Kearney, P., Bergeron, J. J. and Desjardins, M. Organelle proteomics: looking at less to see more. Trends Cell Biol. 13:629-638, 2003. 14. Dreger, M. Proteome analysis at the level of subcellular structures. Eur. J. Biochem. 270:589-599, 2003. 15. Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Walsh, B .J., Tyler, M. I., Traini, M., Sanchez, J.-C., Hochstrasser, D. E, Williams, K. L. and Gooley, A. A. Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19:837-844, 1998. 16. Karlsson, K., Cairns, N., Lubec, G. and Fountoulakis, M. Enrichment of human brain proteins by heparin chromatography. Electrophoresis 20:2970-2976, 1999. 17. Fountoulakis, M., Takacs, M. E, Berndt, E, Langen, H. and Takacs, B. Enrichment of low abundance proteins of Escherichia coli by hydroxyapatite chromatography. Electrophoresis 20:2181-2195, 1999.

II

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING AND PROTEOMICS

~-6 1

18. Righetti, P. G., Castagna, A., Herbert, B., Reymond, E and Rossier, J. S. prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis. Proteomics 3:1397-1407, 2003. 19. Schirmer, E. C. and Gerace, L. Organellar proteomics: the prizes and pitfalls of opening the nuclear envelope. Genome Biol. 3:1008.1-1008.4, 2002. 20. McDonald, T. G. and Van Eyk, J. E. Mitochondrial proteomicsmundercover in the lipid bilayer. Basic Res. Cardiol. 98:219-227, 2003. 21. Fountoulakis, M. and Schlaeger, E. J. The mitochondrial proteins of the neuroblastoma cell line IMR-32. Electrophoresis 24: 260-275, 2003. 22. Taylor, S. W., Fahy, E., Zhang, B., Glenn, G. M., Warnock, D. E., Wiley, S., Murphy, A. N., Gaucher, S. R, Capaldi, R. A., Gibson, B. W. and Ghosh, S. S. Characterization of the human heart mitochondrial proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:281-286, 2003. 23. Molloy, M. P. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of membrane proteins using immobilized pH gradients. Anal. Biochem. 280:1-10, 2000. 24. Nouwens, A. S., Cordwell, S. J., Larsen, M. R., Molloy, M. P., Gillings, M., Willcox, M. D. R and Walsh, B. J. Complementing genomics with proteomics: the membrane subproteome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO 1. Electrophoresis 21:3797-3809, 2000. 25. Ferro, M., Salvi, D., Brugiere, S., Miras, S., Kowalski, S., Louwagie, M., Garin, J., Joyard, J. and Rolland, N. Proteomics of the chloroplast envelope membranes from Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2: 325-345, 2003. 26. Navarre, C., Degand, H., Bennett, K. L., Crawford, J. S., Mortz, E. and Boutry, M. Subproteomics: identification of plasma membrane proteins from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics 2:1706-1714, 2002. 27. Lee, W.-C. and Lee, K. H. Applications of affinity chromatography in proteomics. Anal. Biochem. 324:1-10, 2004. 28. Pieper, R., Su, Q., Gatlin, C. L., Huang, S. T., Anderson, N. L. and Steiner, S. Multicomponent immunoaffinity subtraction chromatography: an innovative step towards a comprehensive survey of the human plasma proteome. Proteomics 3:422-432, 2003. 29. Steel, L. E, Trotter, M. G., Nakajima, P. B., Mattu, T. S., Gonye, G. and Block, T. Efficient and specific removal of albumin from human serum samples. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2:262-270, 2003. 30. Raymackers, J., Daniels, A., De Brabandere, V., Missiaen, C., Dauwe, M., Verhaert, R, Vanmechelen, E. and Meheus, L. Identification of two-dimensionally separated human cerebrospinal fluid proteins by N-terminal sequencing, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization - mass spectrometry, nanoliquid chromatography - electrospray ionization time of flight mass spectrometry, and tandem mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 21:2266-2283, 2000. 31. Jungblut, P., Baumeister, H. and Klose, J. Classification of mouse liver proteins by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 14:638-643, 1996. 32. Besant, P. G., Lasker, M. V., Bui, C. D., Tan, E., Attwood, R V. and Turck, C. W. Proteomics approach to identifying ATP-covalently modified proteins. J. Proteome Res. 3:120-125, 2004. 33. Lopez, M. E, Kristal, B. S., Chernokalskaya, E., Lazarev, A., Shestopalov, A. I., Bogdanova, A. and Robinson, M. High-throughput profiling of the mitochondrial proteome using affinity fractionation and automation. Electrophoresis 21:3427-3440, 2000. 34. Aebersold, R. and Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198-207, 2003. 35. Steinberg, T. H., Agnew, B. J., Gee, K. R., Leung, W. Y., Goodman, T., Schulenberg, B., Hendrickson, J., Beechem, J. M., Haugland, R. R and Patton, W. E Global quantitative phosphoprotein analysis using multiplexed proteomics technology. Proteomics 3:1128-1144, 2003. 36. Schulenberg, B., Aggeler, R., Beechem, J. M., Capaldi, R. A. and Patton, W. E Analysis of steady-state protein phosphorylation in mitochondria using a novel fluorescent phosphosensor dye. J. Biol. Chem. 278:27251-27255, 2003.

~-6~-

M.Y. WHITE AND SoJ.CORDWELL

37. Hart, C., Schulenberg, B., Steinberg, T. H., Leung, W. Y. and Patton, W. E Detection of glycoproteins in polyacrylamide gels and on electroblots using Pro-Q Emerald 488 dye, a fluorescent periodate Schiff-base stain. Electrophoresis 24:588-598, 2003. 38. Zischka, H., Weber, G., Weber, P. J. A., Posch, A., Braun, R. J., Biihringer, D., Schneider, U., Nissum, M., Meitinger, T., Ueffing, M. and Eckerskorn, C. Improved proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria by free-flow electrophoresis. Proteomics 3:906-916, 2003. 39. Hochstrasser, A. C., James, R. W., Pometta, D. and Hochstrasser, D. E Preparative isoelectric focusing and high resolution 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis for concentration and purification of proteins. Appl. Theor. Electrophoresis 1:333-337, 1991. 40. Puchades, M., Westman, A., Blennow, K. and Davidsson, P. Analysis of intact proteins from cerebrospinal fluid by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry after two-dimensional liquid-phase electrophoresis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 13:2450-2455, 1999. 41. Davidsson, P. and Nilsson, C. L. Peptide mapping of proteins in cerebrospinal fluid utilizing a rapid preparative two-dimensional electrophoretic procedure and matrixassisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1473:391-399,1999. 42. Wang, H., Kachman, M. T., Schwartz, D. R., Cho, K. R. and Lubman, D. M. A protein molecular weight map of ES2 clear cell ovarian carcinoma cells using a two-dimensional liquid separations/mass mapping technique. Electrophoresis 23:3168-3181, 2002. 43. Shang, T. Q., Ginter, J. M., Johnston, M. V., Larsen, B. S. and McEwen, C. N. Carrier ampholyte-free solution isoelectric focusing as a prefractionation method for the proteomic analysis of complex protein mixtures. Electrophoresis 24:2359-2368, 2003. 44. Corthals, G. L., Molloy, M. P., Herbert, B. R., Williams, K. L. and Gooley, A. A. Prefractionation of protein samples prior to two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18:317-323, 1997. 45. Rothemund, D. L., Locke, V. L., Liew, A., Thomas, T. M., Wasinger, V. and Rylatt, D. B. Depletion of the highly abundant protein albumin from human plasma using the Gradiflow. Proteomics 3:279-287, 2003. 46. Locke, V. L., Gibson, T. S., Thomas, T. M., Corthals, G. L. and Rylatt, D. B. Gradiflow as a prefractionation tool for two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2:1254-1260, 2002. 47. Pang, L., Fryksdale, B. G., Chow, N., Wong, D. L., Gaertner, A. L. and Miller, B. S. Impact of prefractionation using GradiflowTM on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and protein identification by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flightmass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 24:3484-3492, 2003. 48. Bae, S.-H., Harris, A. G., Hains, P. G., Chen, H., Garfin, D. E., Hazell, S. L., Paik, Y.-K., Walsh, B. J. and Cordwell, S. J. Strategies for the enrichment and identification of basic proteins in proteome projects. Proteomics 3:569-579, 2003. 49. Righetti, P. G., Wenisch, E., Jungbauer, A., Katinger, H. and Faupel, M. Preparative purification of human monoclonal antibody isoforms in a multi-compartment electrolyser with immobiline membranes. J. Chromatogr. 500:681-696, 1990. 50. Righetti, P. G., Bossi, A., Wenisch, E. and Orsini, G. Protein purification in multicompartment electrolyzers with isoelectric membranes. J. Chromatogr. B. 699:105-115, 1997. 51. Herbert, B. and Righetti, P. G. A turning point in proteome analysis: sample prefractionation via multicompartment electrolyzers with isoelectric membranes.. Electrophoresis 21:3639-3648, 2000. 52. Zuo, X. and Speicher, D. W. A method for global analysis of complex proteomes using sample prefractionation by solution isoelectricfocusing prior to two-dimensional electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 284:266-278, 2000. 53. Zuo, X. and Speicher, D. W. Comprehensive analysis of complex proteomes using microscale solution isolectricfocusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2:58-68, 2002.

II

ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING A N D PROTEOMICS

263

54. Zuo, X., Hembach, P., Echan, L. and Speicher, D. W. Enhanced analysis of human breast cancer proteomes using micro-scale solution isoelectricfocusing combined with high resolution 1-D and 2-D gels. J. Chromatogr. B 782:253-265, 2002. 55. Zuo, X., Echan, L., Hembach, P., Tang, H. Y., Speicher, K. D., Santoli, D. and Speicher, D. W. Towards global analysis of mammalian proteomes using sample prefractionation prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels and using one-dimensional gels for insoluble and large proteins. Electrophoresis 22:1603-1615, 2001. 56. G6rg, A., Boguth, G., Kopf, A., Reil, G., Parlar, H. and Weiss, W. Sample prefractionation with Sephadex isoelectric focusing prior to narrow pH range two-dimensional gels. Proteomics 2:1652-1657, 2002. 57. O'Farrell, P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 250:4007-4021, 1975. 58. Lopez, M. E 2-D electrophoresis using carrier ampholytes in the first dimension (IEF). Methods Mol. Biol. 112:111-127, 1999. 59. Celis, J. E., Wolf, H. and Ostergaard, M. Bladder squamous cell carcinoma biomarkers derived from proteomics. Electrophoresis 21:2115-2121, 2000. 60. Celis, J. E. and Gromov, P. 2-D protein electrophoresis: can it be perfected? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10:16-21, 1999. 61. Cells, J. E., Gromov, P., Ostergaard, M., Madsen, P., Honore, B., Dejgaard, K., Olsen, E., Vorum, H., Kristensen, D. B., Gromova, I., Hanuso, A., Van Damme, J., Puype, M., Vandekerckhove, J. and Rasmussen, H. H. Human 2-D PAGE databases for proteome analysis in health and disease, http://biobase.dk/cgi-bin/celis. FEBS Lett. 398:129-134, 1996. 62. VanBogelen, R. A. Probing the molecular physiology of the microbial organism, Escherichia coli using proteomics. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 83:27-55 (2003). 63. VanBogelen, R. A. and Olson, E. R. Application of two-dimensional protein gels in biotechnology. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 1:69-103, 1995. 64. Hecker, M. A proteomic view of cell physiology of Bacillus subtilis--bringing the genome sequence to life. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 83:57-92, 2003. 65. Hecker, M. and Engelmann, S. Proteomics, DNA arrays and the analysis of still unknown regulons and unknown proteins of Bacillus subtilis and pathogenic grampositive bacteria. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 290:123-134, 2000. 66. Choe, L. H. and Lee, K. H. Quantitative and qualitative measure of interlaboratory two-dimensional protein gel reproducibility and the effects of sample preparation, sample load, and image analysis. Electrophoresis 24:3500-3507, 2003. 67. Nishihara, J. C. and Champion, K. M. Quantitative evaluation of proteins in one- and twodimensional polyacrylamide gels using a fluorescent stain. Electrophoresis 23:2203-2215, 2002. 68. G6rg, A., Obermaier, C., Boguth, G., Csordas, A., Diaz, J. J. and Madjar, J. J. Very alkaline immobilized pH gradients for two-dimensional electrophoresis of ribosomal and nuclear proteins. Electrophoresis 18:328-337, 1997. 69. O'Farrell, P. Z., Goodman, H. M. and O'Farrell, P. H. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of basic as well as acidic proteins. Cell 12:1133-1141, 1977. 70. Cordwell, S. J., Basseal, D. J., Bjellqvist, B., Shaw, D. C. and Humphery-Smith, I. Characterisation of basic proteins from Spiroplasma melliferum using novel immobilised pH gradients. Electrophoresis 18:1393-1398, 1997. 71. Olsson, I., Larrson, K., Palmgren, R. and Bjellqvist, B. Organic disulfides as a means to generate streak-free two-dimensional maps with narrow range basic immobilized pH gradient strips as first dimension. Proteomics 2:1630-1632, 2002. 72. Chiari, M., Micheletti, C., Nesi, M., Fazio, M. and Righetti, P. G. Towards new formulations for polyacrylamide matrices: N-acryloylaminoethoxyethanol, a novel monomer combining high hydrophilicity with extreme hydrolytic stability. Electrophoresis 15:177-186, 1994.

2.64

M.u WHITE AND S.J. CORDWELL

73. Hoving, S., Gerrits, B., Voshol, H., Miiller, D., Roberts, R. C. and van Oostrum, J. Preparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis at alkaline pH using narrow range immobilized pH gradients. Proteomics 2:127-134, 2002. 74. Jiang, X. S., Zhou, H., Zhang, L., Sheng, Q. H., Li, S. J., Li, L., Hao, P., Li, Y. X., Xia, Q. C., Wu, J. R. and Zeng, R. A high-throughput approach for subcellular proteome: identification of rat liver proteins using subcellular fractionation coupled with twodimensional liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry and bioinformatic analysis. Mol. Cell Proteomics 3:441-455, 2004. 75. White, M. Y., Cordwell, S. J., McCarron, H. C., Tchen, A. S., Hambly, B. D. and Jeremy, R. W. Modifications of myosin-regulatory light chain correlate with function of stunned myocardium. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 35:833-840, 2003. 76. Candiano, G., Musante, L., Bruschi, M., Ghiggeri, G. M., Herbert, B., Antonucci, E and Righetti, E G. Two-dimensional maps in soft immobilized pH gradient gels: a new approach to the proteome of the third millennium. Electrophoresis 23:292-297, 2002. 77. Bruschi, M., Musante, L., Candiano, G., Ghiggeri, G. M., Herbert, B., Antonucci, E and Righetti, P. G. Soft immobilized pH gradient gels in proteome analysis: a follow-up. Proteomics 3:821-825, 2003. 78. Oh-Ishi, M. and Maeda, T. Separation techniques for high-molecular-mass proteins. J. Chromatogr. B 771:49-66, 2002. 79. Schagger, H. and von Jagow, G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166:368-379, 1987. 80. Baumann, M., Golabek, A., Lalowski, M. and Wisniewski, T. Micropreparative gel electrophoresis of low-molecular-weight peptides: purification of highly insoluble amyloid peptide fragments. Anal. Biochem. 236:191-198, 1996. 81. Fountoulakis, M., Juranville, J. E, Roder, D., Evers, S., Berndt, P. and Langen, H. Reference map of low molecular mass proteins of Haemophilus influenzae. Electrophoresis 19:1819-1827, 1998. 82. Wasinger, V. C. and Humphery-Smith, I. Small genes/gene-products in Escherichia coli K12. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 169:375-382, 1998. 83. Fountoulakis, M., Juranville, J. E, Tsangaris, G. and Suter, L. Fractionation of liver proteins by preparative electrophoresis. Amino Acids 26:27-36, 2004. 84. Fountoulakis, M. and Juranville, J. E Enrichment of low-abundance brain proteins by preparative electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 313:267-282, 2003.

12

CHROMATOFOCUSING DAVID ANDERSON

Department of Chemistry,ClevelandState University,2121 EuclidAvenue,Cleveland, OH 44115 I. INTRODUCTION II. CONVENTIONAL CHROMATOFOCUSING (INTERNAL pH GRADIENT GENERATION) A. Components of Conventional Anion Chromatofocusing B. Models of the Chromatofocusing Process C. Mobile-phase Components and Considerations D. Column Components and Considerations forAnion Chromatofocusing III. GRADIENT CHROMATOFOCUSING (EXTERNAL pH GRADIENT GENERATION) A. Description of Anion Gradient Chromatofocusing B. Advantages of Gradient Chromatofocusing over Conventional Chromatofocusing (Comparing the Anionic Techniques) IV. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS A. pl Determination B. PeakWidths V. APPLICATIONS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

Chromatofocusing is a technique developed by Sluyterman and coworkers 1-4 in 1978, predated by closely related work in ampholytedisplacement chromatography, s The technique employs ion-exchange chromatography using a pH gradient (usually linear) to separate biomolecules with acid/base functionalities. It is principally used in the analysis and purification of proteins. Chromatofocusing was developed with the hope of it becoming a liquid chromatographic version of isoelectric focusing (IEF), which performs both a separation role based on the pI values of a protein and a characterization role in determining the pI values. A third feature of IEF is the high-resolution of the technique stemming from its ability to focus protein bands. While chromatofocusing generally separates proteins based on pI and additionally focuses the protein bands better than salt gradient ion-exchange chromatography 9 2005ElsevierInc.All rightsreserved. Handbookof IsoelectricFocusingand Proteomics D. Garfinand S. Ahuja,editors.

265

266

D.ANDERSON

techniques, it does not realize the capabilities of IEF in terms of accurately determining pI or in achieving the same resolution. However this chromatographic format of pI separations is very useful as an analytical and preparative tool in the analysis and purification of proteins. There are two ways that linear pH gradients can be generated on ion-exchange columns in the chromatofocusing technique: (1) Conventional chromatofocusing (internally-generated pH gradient), in which the ion-exchange column buffers a step change from an application buffer mobile phase at a certain pH to an elution buffer mobile phase at a different pH.

(2) Gradient chromatofocusing (externally-generated pH gradient), in which an elution buffer mobile phase at one pH is mixed in successively greater proportions with an application buffer mobile phase at a different pH, to generate a pH gradient in time prior to entering the column. The majority of published chromatofocusing techniques have employed the internally-generated pH gradient technique. However, recent work on gradient chromatofocusing by Anderson and co-workers 6-8 has demonstrated several advantages over the conventional chromatofocusing technique. Irrespective of how the pH gradient is generated, there are two modes of chromatofocusing:

(1) Anion chromatofocusing~separates proteins using an anionexchange column, in which proteins are retained on a column equilibrated at high pH and then eluted as separated proteins according to their pI value by a decreasing linear pH gradient in the mobile phase. (2) Cation chromatofocusing--separates proteins using a cationexchange column, in which proteins are retained on a column equilibrated at low pH and then eluted as separated proteins according to their pI value by an increasing linear pH gradient in the mobile phase. Anion chromatofocusing is the predominate technique used, primarily because of the poor solubility of some proteins in solutions at low pH, which is the initial condition in cation chromatofocusing. Anion chromatofocusing will thus be the focus of this chapter. This technique can either be performed in a low-performance mode (>20 ~m diameter ion-exchange packing material, gravity feed, or peristaltic pump column chromatography) or a high-performance mode (< 10 ~m diameter ion-exchange packing material, HPLC pump(s)). The high-performance technique results in greater resolution and shorter analysis time, but requires more expensive instrumentation. Reviews, 9-11 book chapters 12-16and a handbook 17 have been written on chromatofocusing.

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

267

II. CONVENTIONALCHROMATOFOCUSING(INTERNALpH GRADIENTGENERATION) A. Components of Conventional Anion Chromatofocusing Conventional anion chromatofocusing is diagrammed in Figure 1. The principal feature of the technique is a step change from one pH buffer to another to generate a linear pH gradient. The components for a typical setup include: (1) A weak anion-exchange column, which has positively charged amine groups on the packing material leading to retention of negatively charged proteins. It also serves to buffer pH changes imposed on it, which is the basis for linear pH gradient generation (except for the displacement model described below); (2) An application (starting) buffer mobile phase, consisting of a single simple buffer component (such as diethanolamine, Tris, triethanolamine, 2-methylimidazole, bis-Tris, piperazine, or Nmethylpiperazine) chosen according to the upper limit of the pH gradient and adjusted to the desired pH with 1-2 M acid (such as HC1, acetic acid, or iminodiacetic acid (saturated)). References are available to describe which components are used for particular pH ranges. 17,18This establishes a sufficiently high pH (at least 0.5 units greater than the pI of the most basic protein in the sampie) ~9 to retain an injected sample protein on the anion-exchange column.

I Isocratic

Pump

High p H Buffer

L o w pH Buffer

W e a k Anion- Exchange Colunm Inlet p H Gradient

pH

Outlet p H Gradient

Column I~H Gradient (at particular time) pH

pH Distance

Time

Time

FIGURE I Conventional anion chromatofocusing setup showing pH profile at various locations in the setup.

268

D.ANOEP,SON

(3) An elution buffer mobile phase consisting of one of the specialized polyampholyte buffers [available from Amersham Biosciences as Pharmalyte 8-10.5, Polybuffer 96, or Polybuffer 74, depending on the pH range employed], is adjusted to the lower pH limit of the pH gradient with 1-2 M acid (such as HC1, acetic acid, or iminodiacetic acid (saturated)). Elution buffer is then introduced as a step change to the anion-exchange column to produce an internal, linear pH gradient. 17,18 (4) a peristaltic pump or gravity-feed system. (5) a fraction collector and~or UV detector. B. Models of the Chromatofocusing Process

There are two basic models that have been proposed for explaining the chromatofocusing process: one is the buffer interaction model and the other is the displacement model. 9 Different aspects of each model can help explain the chromatofocusing process. 8,1s Each model is described below for an anion-chromatofocusing method. A dynamic ion-exchange model and a more sophisticated theory for simple buffers 2~ have also been proposed, but will not be discussed. Retention of proteins on the column is the same in both models. An anion-exchange column is equilibrated with an application buffer at a sufficiently high pH to impart a negative charge on the sample proteins for retention on the positively charged anion-exchange groups of the column. At the beginning of an anion-chromatofocusing run, the mobile and stationary phases are at the same high pH of the application buffer. The elution buffer consists of multiple polyampholyte species that collectively have pI values that span the desired pH range of the pH gradient. The low pH elution buffer is introduced to the column through a step change from the high pH application buffer. The elution mechanism is described below from the perspective of each model. I. Buffer Interaction Model of Anion Chromatofocusing

A buffer interaction model for chromatofocusing was proposed by Sluyterman and Elgersma. 1 This model assumes that there is a sufficiently high and even buffer capacity throughout the desired pH range in both the mobile and stationary phases in order to generate a smooth linear pH gradient. These researchers viewed the generation of the linear gradient as a process by which the acidic elution buffer titrates the anionexchange groups on the weak anion-exchange column. The pH of the mobile and stationary phases gradually decline due to the buffering action of these anion-exchange groups (which are weak bases) on the column, as these groups resist any large change in pH. This buffering of the pH change effectively extends the time of decline in pH at the column outlet, from being an instantaneous drop in pH that a step change

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

2.69

would cause if there was no buffering action, to a gradual change in pH from the upper pH of the application buffer to the lower pH of the elution buffer (see Figure 1). In the buffer interaction model, the column is divided into many small segments from the inlet to the outlet. The process of chromatofocusing is viewed as a series of simultaneous transfers of the mobile phase from the "upstream" column segment to the "downstream" column segment, with a subsequent equilibration between the new mobile-phase aliquot and the stationary phase segment into which it is transferred. This process is illustrated in Figure 2 for the simple case of a column containing three column segments. The pH in a segment is calculated from the equation is

PHequilibrium'segment =

/JspHs (start) + ]~mPHm(start) ]~s + ]~m

(1)

where PHequilibrium,segment is the pH in a given column segment after the shift in mobile phase from the upstream column segment and after allowing the mobile phase and stationary phase in the segment to reach acid-base equilibrium (note that both mobile and stationary phases reach the same pH at equilibrium)./3 s and/3m are the buffer capacity for the stationary phase and the mobile phase, respectively, and pH s (start) and prim(start) are the initial pH of the stationary phase and mobile phase immediately after the shift of mobile phase segments, prior to any acid-base reaction between the mobile and stationary phases. The basis for Equation (1) is that the final pH for two buffers mixed together equals a weighted average of the original pH values of the two buffers, weighted by the values of their respective buffer capacities. Thus, in the case of Figure 2, where /3s is chosen to be a factor of 2 greater than/3m, the final pH in a particular segment will be skewed toward the initial pH of the stationary phase. Figure 3 shows results using Equation (1) for the generation of the pH gradient in the entire chromatofocusing run. Figure 3 gives a more realistic case (more column segments) than Figure 2 (used to illustrate calculations). A continuous pH gradient in distance (from low pH at the column inlet to high pH at the column exit) is established down the entire length of the column. The gradient is called an internal pH gradient (or column pH gradient). At the beginning of the run, each protein is initially retained at the column inlet, which is equilibrated with a high pH application buffer. The internal pH gradient in the column is generated with a step change to low pH elution buffer. Each protein moves from the column inlet to its respective pH = pI zone in the column with the formation of the internal pH gradient. The pH = pI zone is the equilibrium position of a particular protein. Any of this protein "upstream" to its pH = pI location will be positively charged. A positively charged protein will not bind to the column but will be in the mobile phase, where it will be carried downstream through the column until it first passes the pH = pI location

270

D. ANDERSON

Column pH of elution buffer entering the column pH of column equilibrated with application buffer at the step 5 change to the elution buffer

Shift of mobile phase

l

pH of mobile phase exiting the column

pH of sl~kt, phase s ~gments 8

8

8

8

8

8

5

8

8

8

8

8

7

8

8

7

8

8

5

7

8

7

8

8

6.33

7.67

8

6.33

7.67

8

5

6.33

7.67

6.33

7.67

8

5.89

7.22

7.89

5.89

7.22

7.89

5

5.89

7.22

5.89

7.22

7.89

5.59

6.78

7.67

5.59

6.78

7.67

5

5.59

6.78

5.59

6.78

7.67

5.39

6.38

7.37

5.39

6.38

7.37

8

8

5

Equilibrium pH values after shift

5 --~

Shift of mobile phase

5

Equilibrium pH values after shift

5---~

Shift of mobile phase

5---~

Equilibrium pH values after shift

5---~

Shift of mobile phase

5 ~

Equilibrium pH values after shift

5 ~

Shift of mobile phase

5

Equilibrium pH values after shift

pH of mo ~ile phase segments

5 ~

--~

8

8

---~8

---~8

---~8

~

7.89

~

7.89

7.67

~

7.67

F I G U R E 2 Example calculations of pH in a weak anion-exchange column used in a conventional chromatofocusing setup employing the buffer interaction model. The chromatofocusing column is divided into three segments. The pH of the stationary (bottom) and mobile (top) phases is indicated immediately after a shift of mobile phase to the adjacent downstream segment and after equilibrium is reached (calculated with Equation (I)) prior to the next shift. Application and elution buffers have pH values of 8 and 5, respectively, and ~s - 2/~m"

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING Transfer (Shift) Number Seg 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

~

Seg 2

Seg 3

Seg 4

Seg 5

Seg 6

Seg 7

Seg 8

Seg 9

SeglO

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00

7.6 8.00 8.00 ~'26~2 "~,89 I 8oo

8.00

800

8.00 8oo

8.00 8oo

8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.0O 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.99 7.97 7.95 7.91 7.85

8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.99 7.97 7.95 7.92 7.87 7.81

6,38 6.05 5.79 5.59

5.08 5.05 5.03 5.02 5.02 5.01 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5,00 5.00 5,00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5,00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.OO 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

FIGURE 3 tionary

271

5,31 9 I 3 5.1 5.08 | 5.06 l 5.04 5.03 5,02 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Equilibrium

theoretical

column

800

7,96

7.37 7.04 6.71 6,40 6.13 5.90 5.70 5.54 4

5.10 5,07 5.05 5.04 5.03 5.02 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00

5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

I I

7,4 7,22 6.95 6.68 6,42 6.18 5.97 5.78 5.63 5.50 5,39

800

800

8oo

8,00 8.00 8.00 7,98 7.94 7,87

7.36 7.13 6,89 6.66 6.43 6.21 6.02 5.84 5.69 5.56 5.45 5.36

5.081 5.06 1 5.04 5.03 5.02

5.14"~[

5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

5.05 5.04 5.03 5.02 5.02 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

5.02

"

5.08

I

!

5.06

is d i v i d e d

of mobile-phase into

10 s e g m e n t s .

respectively, and/~, -

shift number. Application 2~}m.

8,00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.99 7.98 7,94 7,88

7.47 7.28 7.07 6.86 6.64 6.43 6.24 6.06 5.89 5.75 5.62 5.51 5.41 5.34 5.27

7.39 7.21 7.02 6.83 6.63 6.44 6.26 6.09 5.93 5.79 5.66 5.56 5.46

5114 ~ 5.08 5.06 5.05 5.04 5.03 5.02 5.02 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

5.a8

5.31

800

8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.99 7.97 7.94 7.90 7.83

7.48 7.33 7.16 6.98 6.80 6.62 6.44 6.27 6.11 5.96 5.83 5.70

5.10 J " ~ . 2 3 5.08 I 19 5.06 5.1 5.05 5.12 5.04 5.10 5.03 5.08 5.02 5.06 5.02 5.05 5.01 5.04 5.01 5.03 5.01 5.02 5.01 5.02 5.00 5.01 5.00 5.01 5.00 5.01 5.00 5.01 5.00 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

column Bold

segments

numbers

5.09 5.07 5.06 5.05 5.04 5.03 5.02 5.02 5.02 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00

mobile

Equation

indicate

7.38 7.24 7.09 6.93 6.77 6.61 6.45 6.30 6.15 6.01 5.89 5.77 5.66 5.57 5.48 5.41 5.35 5.29

5.08 5.06 5.05 5.04 5.03 5.02 5.02 5.02 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

(both

l i n e ) a n d 5. I ( b o t t o m

and elution

7.43 7.28 7.12 6.95 6.78 6.61 6.45 6.28 6.13 5.99 5.86 5.74 5.63 5.54 5.45 5.38 5.32 5.26

5.60 5.50 5.42 5.35

shifts calculated with

p r o t e i n s h a v i n g p l v a l u e s o f 7.5 ( t o p a r r o w e d

sus t h e m o b i l e - p h a s e

800

8oo

8.00 7.99 7.95

pH of weak anion-exchange

phases) versus the number

matofocusing

800

and sta-

I.The

chro-

the p o s i t i o n s o f arrowed

line) ver-

b u f f e r s h a v e p H v a l u e s o f 8 a n d 5,

27~

D. ANDERSON

(downstream to p H = p I ) . When this protein is downstream to the pH = pI location, it becomes negatively charged and binds to the anion exchanger and thus ceases its movement in the column. The protein will remain bound to the column until the pH = pI zone passes, causing it to have a net zero charge and be released into the mobile phase. It will then proceed just past the pH = pI zone, where it develops a net negative charge and is subsequently retained on the column; and so forth down through the column. The movement of proteins through successive pH zones occurs because the mobile phase velocity exceeds the velocity of the pH zones. This process by which a protein is continually relocated into its pH = pI zone is also the source the focusing effect in chromatofocusing, leading to narrow peak widths. There is thus an initial separation of the proteins in distance on the column with the establishment of the internal pH gradient. This internal pH gradient however is not stagnant. It moves down the column with time as more elution buffer is pumped into the column, as seen in Figure 3. Eventually each pH will exit the column along with proteins that have a pI at that pH. Each pH band moves through the column at a constant velocity that is different for each particular pH value. This is seen in Figure 3 for examples of two theoretical proteins having pI values of 5.1 and 7.5. The position where each protein is retained on the column (at the first column segment where the protein encounters a pH > pI) versus the number of mobile phase transfers is given in bold. It is seen that the positions at various times fit a straight line (indicated by the arrowed lines), meaning that the proteins (and their associated pH zones) travel at a constant velocity during the entire chromatofocusing process. The slopes are different for the two proteins, indicating different velocities for each different pI (or pH band); the lower the pI of a protein, the lower its velocity in the chromatofocusing column. The velocity of a particular pH band thus steadily decreases for pH bands with successively lower values. This is because the higher pH values are titrated with the greatest pH change (exposed to the front of the step gradient) and thus the change in pH for the higher pH values occurs rapidly. The lower value pH bands however have less difference between themselves and the elution buffer pH, thus the change in pH is less rapid. Also, the velocity of a particular pH band is inversely related to the pH of the elution buffer. Finally, the velocity of a pH band is also dependent on the ratio ~3m/~3s. The higher the ratio, the higher the velocity of a pH band, because an aliquot of mobile-phase buffer will titrate the stationary phase to a greater extent. Sluyterman's and Elgersma's theory of conventional chromatofocusing views pH gradients from the perspective of the internal pH gradient (dpH/dx, where x is units of column distance). This viewpoint is analogous to IEF in that pH values are assigned to a particular location on the gel. However, unlike in IEF, there is no set position for a particular pH

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

273

in the column, as it is continually moving through the column. Although direct characterization of the internal gradient is not conveniently done, it can be indirectly characterized by measuring the pH at the column outlet. The outlet pH gradient correlates positively with the internal pH gradient, meaning a change in the internal pH gradient produces a proportional change in the outlet pH gradient. From an experimental viewpoint, the characterization of the outlet pH gradient (time gradient) is more practical than the characterization of the internal pH gradient (distance gradient) because separations in chromatofocusing are monitored in time, not in distance. Higher resolution is obtained with decreased slope of the internal pH gradient (and outlet pH gradient). 1,~9Shallow slopes are obtained by decreasing the pH gradient range (i.e., using application and elution buffers with small differences in pH), increasing the column length, decreasing the concentration of the elution buffer (i.e., decreased buffer capacity of the elution buffer), or by using a different anion-exchange column with higher buffer capacity. 2,19

2. Displacement (Frontal) Model in Anion Chromatofocusing The displacement mechanism of chromatofocusing was first proposed for ampholyte-displacement chromatography, 27 which is a technique closely related to, if not the same as, chromatofocusing. This mechanism was mentioned by Sluyterman and Elgersma, ~ proposed by Hearn and Lyttle, 1,19 and further developed by Murel et al. 28,29 in application to chromatofocusing. The displacement mechanism proposes the establishment of an internal pH gradient within a column via a gradient distribution of different buffer components within the ion-exchange column. This internal pH gradient is established because the stronger acid components in the elution buffer will preferentially bind to the initial anion-exchange sites at the inlet, with the next strongest acid binding to the next available sites down the column and so forth, assuming that the concentrations of the buffers are low enough such that all the sites are not saturated with the strongest acid components. This retention of successively lower affinity (decreasing acidity) buffer components down the length of the column leads to an increasing pH gradient in distance from the column inlet to outlet. Note that binding only occurs for the conjugate basic (anionic) forms of these acids, which are the forms that are present in the column equilibrated to high pH. As more elution buffer enters the column, additional stronger acid components are introduced onto the column, which displace weaker acid components immediately downstream to it, and these weaker acid components then displace even weaker acid components downstream to it, etc. Buffer components move down the column, with the successively stronger affinity (more acidic) components being retained, displacing weaker affinity (less acidic) components. Each component is effectively

274

D. ANDERSON

eluted off the column by the component having the next highest affinity, which is subsequently displaced by the component of next highest affinity, and so on. This succession of ampholyte displacement is termed as an "ampholyte train" by Murel et al. 29 This displacement process includes proteins which move down the column in bands of ampholyte that have the same affinity for the column anion-exchange sites as the proteins. A protein elutes at a pH that is determined by the acidity of the particular ampholyte band that it is in. Thus for anion chromatofocusing, the pH of the column is continuously lowered as successively more acidic components are eluted from the column, producing a continuously decreasing outlet pH gradient. Thus this mechanism also depicts proteins separated in the order of their pI values. According to the displacement mechanism, the generation of a smooth linear pH gradient requires that there be an even distribution of mobile-phase components with incremental differences of affinities for the column's ion-exchange groups. This requirement is met by an even buffer capacity in the mobile phase throughout the gradient pH range, since the affinity value for a component, for the most part, correlates positively with its acid strength. Thus, both models require an even buffer capacity in the mobile phase (which in the displacement model results from an even distribution of ampholytes of successively differing affinities). However, unlike the buffer interaction model, the displacement model does not require the column to have an even buffering capacity throughout the gradient pH range. Thus strong ion-exchangers, which do not have buffering capacity in the required pH range for protein separation, have been occasionally used. 28,29 Also it was shown that Mono P columns, which are often used in chromatofocusing, have weak buffering capacity below a pH of 9, the range in which most separations take place in chromatofocusing. 8 These observations bring into question the presently held dogma in chromatofocusing which states that a column must have buffering capacity in the range of the generated pH gradient.

C. Mobile-phase Components and Considerations Most conventional chromatofocusing techniques utilize elution buffer components from Amersham Biosciences. There are three elution buffers available: Polybuffer 74, Polybuffer 96, and Pharmalyte 8-10.5, designed for pH ranges 7-4, 9-6, and >9, respectively. 17,3~Generally, the largest pH range recommended is 3 pH units, although wide range techniques from pH 9.5 to 4.0 31 and from pH 8.5 to 3.5 32 have been reported. Narrow-range pH gradients (much less than a pH range of 3), however, yield the best resolution of p r o t e i n s . 33-3s The appropriate application and elution buffers for a various pH ranges are given in several references. 17,18

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

2~5

The exact chemical structures of the polyampholytes in commercial chromatofocusing elution buffers are proprietary information. These polyampholytes are poorly defined and vary in physical and chemical properties, is However, general chemical features of these components have been reported or can be reasonably surmised. It is widely assumed that the components are similar to carrier ampholytes used in IEE is In fact, Polybuffers 74 and 96 have been shown to substitute effectively for standard carrier ampholytes in IEF techniques. 36 Polyampholytes used in IEF have also been used in chromatofocusing. 9 In the initial publication describing Polybuffers 74 and 96, the chemical structure of the various species in these polybuffers is reported to be amphoteric (meaning that they have both acidic and basic groups) with the buffering functionalities consisting principally of sterically protected tertiary amine groups, with a small percentage of sterically protected secondary amine groups and no primary amine groups. 3~ It is reasonable to assume that the polybuffer species also contain carboxylic acid functionality(ies) to complete their amphoteric structure, in accordance with Vesterberg's report of "polyprotic amino carboxylic acids, each containing at least four weak protolytic groups, at least one being a carboxyl group and at least one a basic nitrogen atom, but no peptide bonds". 37,38 Vesterberg's work served as the foundation for the synthesis of Ampholine 38 (Amersham Biosciences) and presumably for other commercial ampholytes used in IEF. A structure for a hypothetical ampholyte component in Pharmalyte has been published showing both carboxylic acid groups and basic amines. 38 An extensive discussion on properties of various ampholytes used in IEF has been published. 38 The exact requirements for mobile-phase buffers generating pH linear gradients on ion-exchange columns are not entirely clear. A requirement for a sufficiently high and even constant mobile-phase buffer capacity (or an even distribution of displacers of differing affinity) throughout the pH range of the gradient is widely acknowledged, being stipulated by both the buffer interaction and displacement mechanisms. This requirement is met by elution buffers containing multiple components having pI (or PKa) values that span the pH range of the pH gradient. What is unclear is whether or not there are restrictions on the chemical structures of the elution buffer components. Do considerations for the development of components used in IEF apply to chromatofocusing? The technique of IEF requires an amphoteric substance to serve as a carrier ampholyte, such that the ampholyte component (along with a protein having that exact same pI) will concentrate in the gel at a pH equal to its pI. Focusing of a particular ampholyte at its pH = pI location of the gel directly results from the amphoteric nature of the carrier ampholytes. For example, an ampholyte at the anode side of the neutral species (pH = pI) band will be pH < pI, resulting in its protonation and acquisition of a net positive charge. This positively charged ampholyte will be

276

D.ANDERSON

subsequently repelled by the positive anode back into the neutral ampholyte zone, where it again exists in a form having a net charge of zero. An analogous process take place for ampholytes on the cathodic side of the pI band, except in this case there is a loss of protons which gives a net negative charge to the ampholyte molecule. This results in its subsequent repulsion back into the neutral ampholyte zone by the cathode. The development of a pH gradient on a chromatofocusing column is a substantially different process than lEE First, it is not an equilibrium process in which a steady-state pH gradient is developed in the gel. On the contrary, chromatofocusing is a dynamic process in which pH is continually changing in the column. For another, there is one direction of movement in the chromatofocusing column (ignoring diffusion) toward the column outlet. This is different from IEF, in which there are two directions of movement depending on the charge properties of the molecules. Finally, there are significantly different roles for the stationary support in the two techniques. The proteins and mobilephase components directly interact with the ion-exchange packing material in chromatofocusing, contributing significantly to the separation mechanism, while there is theoretically no interaction of these components with the gel in lEE Thus, considerations for buffer components in IEF do not necessarily apply to the requirements of chromatofocusing. There is not an a priori need, as in IEF, for amphoteric buffer species in chromatofocusing, since the development of pH gradients via buffer interaction or displacement mechanisms does not require the presence of more than one buffering functionality on a particular buffer component. However, in practice, there are only a few examples in which non-amphoteric elution buffers have been used in conventional chromatofocusing to generate internal pH gradients. Chromatofocusing studies have been published using a step change to an elution buffer containing multiple simple buffer components. The pH gradients generated from these attempts have not been smooth, instead show cascade steps, spikes, and protein plateau regions. 3,19,32'39,40A possible cause for the pH spikes may be the retention of anionic buffer species on the anion-exchange column. These anionic species arise from the conversion of acidic components of the elution buffer to their conjugate base forms on exposure to the high pH column. These conjugate base anions are subsequently eluted as the pH decreases, causing the pH to spike. Frey and co-workers 26,41 addressed these difficulties by employing amine buffer components. These amine buffers generate smooth gradients because they are not retained by the anion-exchange column. However, polyampholyte solutions continue to be the elution buffer of choice in conventional chromatofocusing, due to their extensive track record of being able to generate reasonable pH gradients.

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

277

D. Column Components and Considerations for Anion Chromatofocusing Examples of anion-exchange columns that have been used in anionchromatofocusing experiments are given in Table 1, although other anion-exchange columns have been used. 9 The technique predominantly employs weak anion exchangers, although strong anion exchangers have also been used occassionally. 28,29 Important features of anion-exchange columns used for chromatofocusing are stability at high pH values, large pores (>_250A in pore diameter) to allow for the diffusion of proteins into the packing material, and use of either high-performance ionexchange packing materials (10 ~tm particle diameter or less) for optimal results in terms of increased resolution, sensitivity, and speed of analysis (requires HPLC or FPLC pumps) or use of low-performance ionexchange packing materials (>10 gm particle diameter) for less expensive instrumental components. The requirement of even buffering capacity of the column throughout the pH range of the gradient, as mentioned previously, may not be a strict requirement. However, current views still maintains a need for even buffering capacity for the column throughout the pH gradient range. Many published procedures use the columns specifically marketed for chromatofocusing by Amersham Biosciences, although there is no apparent advantage of these columns over other anion-exchange columns. There have been no real significant studies done comparing anion-exchange columns used in anion chromatofocusing. Specialized formats of chromatofocusing include the use of monolithic and micropellicular supports for separation of manganese peroxidase isoenzymes42 and hemoglobin variants, 26 respectively, in less than 2min. A microcolumn chromatofocusing technique (0.2mm columns) is useful for analysis of small injection a m o u n t s . 43

III. GRADIENT CHROMATOFOCUSING(EXTERNAL pH GRADIENT GENERATION) Gradient chromatofocusing, developed by Anderson and co-workers, 6-8'44 u s e s a gradient HPLC system to generate an external pH gradient imposed on an anion-exchange HPLC column. This chromatofocusing technique is a more versatile approach to chromatofocusing than is the step-change method, having significant optimization and consumable expense advantages.

A. Description of Anion Gradient Chromatofocusing I. Overview The anion gradient chromatofocusing process is diagrammed in Figure 4. The column is first equilibrated with a high pH application buffer. Sample is then injected. A HPLC gradient system is then used to

TABLE I

Examples of Anion Chromatofocusing Columns Used'l

Low/high performance

Column

Manufacturer

Mono P

Amersham Biosciences Arnersham Biosciences Arnersharn Biosciences J. T. Baker

1Iigh

SynChrom

PBE 94 PBE118 Bakerbond WP-PEI SynChroPak AX-300 [AX-SOO] [AX-1000)

"Polyethyteneimine.

Stronglweak anion-exchanger (group)

Support matrix

Low

Weak (3" and 4" amines) (3" and 4" arnines)

Low

(3" and 4O amines)

High (and Low)

Weak (PEP)

Polystyrene/ divinylbenzene Cross-linked agarose Cross-linked agarose Silica

High

Weak (PEP)

Silica

Particle diameter

(Pm)

Pore diameter

(4

pH stability

10

2-12

40-120

3-12

40-120

3-12

5 [15, 401

250-300

2-10

6.5 and 7 I71 (101

300 [SO01 jl000)

c

8.5

Comments

Used in the pH range 4-9 Used in the pH range 8-1 1

12

279

CH ROMATO FOCU SING

Gradient Pump System

High pH Buffer

Low pH Buffer

Weak Anion-Exchange Column I I

pH

pH

Outlet pH Gradient

Column pH Gradient (at particulartime)

Inlet pH Gradient

pH Distance

Time

I

FIGURE 4 the setup.

Time

Gradient anion chromatofocusing setup showing pH profile at various locations in

produce a linear inlet pH gradient in time (produced by successively increasing the ratio of a low pH elution buffer to the high pH application buffer), which is introduced onto a high-performance anionexchange column. This is different than the conventional technique which introduces a step change in pH to the column (see Figure 1). The inlet pH gradient is held up by the column, either through the column's buffering action or through a displacement mechanism, as discussed previously. This leads to the establishment of a pH gradient in distance in the column (internal pH gradient) and a pH gradient in time at the column outlet (outlet pH gradient). The focusing capability of gradient chromatofocusing is shown in Figure 5, which compares gradient chromatofocusing with salt gradient ion-exchange chromatography in analyzing the same sample with the same column. Figure 6 shows a comparable performance of the conventional and gradient chromatofocusing technique. However, gradient chromatofocusing can be further optimized as discussed below. 2. Mobile Phase and Column Components

An example application-elution buffer system used in gradient chromatofocusing is given in Table 2. The two buffers are mixed externally by a HPLC gradient system to generate a linear pH gradient from 7.6 to 4. 44 Note that the p K a values for the various buffer components are spaced by 1 pH unit to give an even mobile-phase buffer capacity throughout the pH gradient. In theory, any weak anion-exchange column can be used

280

D.ANDERSON

Gradient

Chromatofocusing pH 7.6 to 4.1 (30 min)

NaCI Gradient 0 - 0.3 M in 40 min

|

0

i

i

I

10

i

20 Time (min)

I

30

40

FIGURE 5 Gradient anion chromatofocusing compared with salt gradient anionexchange chromatography in the analysis of ~lactoglobulin B (early eluting peak) and ~-Iactoglobulin A (late eluting peak).The same Mono P column and the same amount of injected protein sample were used for both studies. See Reference 8.

(and probably strong anion-exchange columns, although this has not yet been tested). Mono P (Amersham Biosciences) and Protein Pak DEAE (Waters) columns have been used. 6-8,44 B. Advantages of Gradient Chromatofocusing over Conventional Chromatofocusing (Comparing the Anionic Techniques) Gradient chromatofocusing has several distinct advantages over the conventional chromatofocusing technique. One limitation of the

12

CHROMATOFOCUSING

281

Chromatofocusing

1~

(25 mM)

Conventional Chromatofocusing

,

0

I

10

I

20

I

30

Time (min) FIGURE 6 Gradient chromatofocusing compared with conventional chromatofocusing in the analysis of the the same injected amount of a standard protein mixture (conalbumin, BSA,/~lactoglobulin B, ovalbumin, ~lactoglobulin A, in order of earliest to latest eluting peaks).The same Mono P column and pH gradient slope were used in both techniques.The earlier elution of the conventional technique is due to the gradient starting at a lower pH (same slope though). See Reference 8.

conventional technique is that it utilizes polyampholyte buffers. Polyampholyte buffers are expensive, cause poor chromatographic reproducibility because of variability in their physical and chemical properties, is and associate with some proteins leading to additional complications. 4s As stated previously, attempts to use simple buffer components in conventional

282

D.ANDERSON TABLE 2

Example of Mobile-phase Buffers Used in Gradient Chromatofocusing 44

(pKa)

Application buffer (pK~)

Elution buffer

Components

Bis-tris-propane (6.80) Piperazine (5.68)

Concentrations of buffer used (for each component) pH adjustment

10-50 mM

Acetic acid (4.76) Lactic acid (3.81) Chloroacetic acid (2.87) 6 to 50 mM

Adjusted to pH 7.6 using HCI

No pH adjustment

technique have not been successful. A possible source of pH irregularities in the conventional technique, using simple buffer components, is the presence of acidic components in the elution buffer, which will bind in their conjugate base forms to anion-exchange sites as the elution buffer encounters the anion-exchange column equilibrated at high pH. In the conventional chromatofocusing design there is a step change to the elution buffer, which means that the concentration of acidic species exposed to high pH is at a maximum and thus a large amount of acidic species bind to the anionexchange column. These species will elute later as the pH decreases, causing irregularities in the pH gradient. Figure 4 illustrates the inherent advantage that the gradient chromatofocusing design has over conventional chromatofocusing by its ability to generate smooth linear pH gradients with simple buffer components. Gradient chromatofocusing minimizes irregularity effects by gradually introducing elution buffer to the column, meaning that any perturbation effects are also gradual. This leads to smoother gradients compared with pH gradients generated by a large change in pH. A further advantage of the design of gradient chromatofocusing in generating smooth gradients is its ability to adjust the gradient program to accommodate for any inherent irregularities in pH when buffers are mixed. For example, Shan and Anderson 8,44 utilized different proportioning rates throughout one gradient run to generate smooth reproducible linear pH gradients. This also gives gradient chromatofocusing the flexibility of generating any desired gradient shape. Another limitation of the conventional chromatofocusing technique concerns the concentration of the buffer in the mobile phase. Relatively low buffer concentrations are required in the conventional technique for generating pH gradient slopes that are not too steep, in order to obtain reasonable resolution. 1,2,19,46 Hearn and Lyttle 19 found that a buffer concentration range of 2.5-5 mM Buffalyte WR 3-10 (Pierce chemical Company) was needed to produce suitable pH gradients for conventional chromatofocusing analysis. A high concentration of buffer in the mobile phase produces too steep a pH gradient slope in the conventional

12.

CHROMATOFOCUSING

283

technique, as the mobile-phase buffering capacity overwhelms the buffering capacity of the column. Gradient chromatofocusing can use a wide range of buffer concentrations, from very low to as high as 75 mM concentration of each buffer component. 8 This capability of employing high buffer concentrations results from its design feature in which incremental pH changes are introduced to the column via the external gradient, not a precipitous drop in pH. There is no influence of buffer concentration on the outlet pH gradient slope in gradient chromatofocusing (although concentration does influence the slope of the internal pH gradient, with lower mobile-phase buffer concentrations giving steeper internal pH gradients), TM allowing the use of 10-20 times higher concentration buffers than is used in the conventional technique. Use of higher concentration buffers is highly advantageous for solubilization of proteins, which can be a problem in conventional chromatofocusing. It has also been shown that buffer concentration is an important independent parameter in separation, with resolution gains at higher buffer concentrations of 3- to 25-fold noted compared with the conventional technique. 8 The effect of buffer concentration on the separation of proteins is shown in Figure 7. Finally, there is a distinct advantage of gradient chromatofocusing in its ease of varying the outlet pH gradient slope through manipulation of the gradient program; steep slopes are advantageous for speed of analysis and shallow gradients are advantageous for high resolution. Figure 8 shows the increased resolution for proteins obtained when shallow pH gradients are used. Thus, gradient chromatofocusing addresses a deficiency of the conventional technique in generating shallow pH gradients. 16

IV. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS A. pl Determination A comparison from various studies of the elution pH in conventional anion chromatofocusing versus pI determined by IEF is given in Table 3. 47-57 The difference between the two techniques (elution pH minus IEF pI) is plotted in Figure 9. The differences range from + 1.5 to - 1 . 7 pH units, having an absolute average value of 0.76 pH units. Thus chromatofocusing provides, at best, a rough approximation of pI. For this reason the pH of elution in chromatofocusing is referred to as an "apparent pI." Table 3 shows an almost equal number of positive deviations (13 of 30) as negative deviations (17 of 30) and an average difference close to zero, indicating that there is no directional bias for chromatofocusing compared with IEE Figure 9 indicates that there is also no appreciable pI-dependent trend in the difference (elution pH minus IEF pI), as the plot has a very small correlation coefficient (r2 = 0.027).

2,84

D. ANDERSON

CAIb 75 mM L-A Ova

L-B

Ova

50 mM

12.5 , j ~ -~ 0

J. 10

J_ 20

I 30

40

Time (min) FIGURE 7 Gradient chromatofocusing studies showing the effect of using different concentrations of buffer components in the application and elution buffers in the analysis of a standard protein mixture (conalbumin, BSA, ~lactoglobulin B, ovalbumin, ~lactoglobulin A, in order of earliest to latest eluting peaks). Buffer concentrations are the concentrations for each component in the application (bis-tris propane and piperazine) and elution (pyridine, acetic acid, lactic acid, and chloroacetic acid) buffers. See Reference 8.

There are several reasons for the difference between a protein's chromatofocusing elution pH and its IEF pI. One significant reason is that the retention of a protein on an ion-exchange column is through the interaction of only a portion of the protein's structure with the ion exchanger; proteins usually bind through their strongest interacting sites, s8,59 Thus, it is not the

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

285

Steep Gradient pH 7.6 to 4.2 in 20 min (-0.2 pH/min)

Shallow Gradient pH 7.6 to 3.6 in 70 min (-0.06 pH/min)

0

i

I

20

i

40

t

I

60

I

80

Time (min) FIGURE 8 Gradient chromatofocusing studies showing increased resolution for a standard protein mixture (conalbumin, BSA, ~lactoglobulin B, ovalbumin, and ~lactoglobulin A, in order of earliest to latest eluting peaks) when the pH gradient slope is decreased.

charge state of the entire protein, but rather the charge state of the interacting surface region of the protein that influences its retention and elution. It would not be expected that a technique dependent on a portion of the protein's structure (chromatofocusing) would be an accurate indicator of a property arising from the entire protein structure (pI). The elution pH of a protein in chromatofocusing could be higher or lower than its pI, since there is no predictable relationship between the acid/base properties of the protein's surface regions and that of the entire molecule.

286

D. ANDERSON

TABLE 3 Summary of Studies Comparing Elution pH of ConventionalAnion Chromatofocusing Using Ampholyte Elution Buffers and IEF pl

Elution pH chromatofocusing

pl determined by IEF

Difference (elution pH-IEF value)

Reference

Albumin fraction 5 (bovine) Biliverdin reductase-1 (rat) Biliverdin reductase-2 (rat) Creatine kinase MM- 1 (human heart and skeletal muscle)

4.69 6.91 6.33 8.3

4.90 6.23 5.91 7.2

-0.21 0.68 0.42 1.1

47 48 48 49

Creatine kinase MM-2 (human heart and skeletal muscle)

7.9

6.9

1

49

Creatine kinase MM-3 (human heart and skeletal muscle)

7.6

6.7

0.9

49

Creatine kinaseMM-4 (human heart and skeletal muscle)

7.2

6.4

0.8

49

Creatine kinaseMM-5 (human heart and skeletal muscle)

6.8

6.2

0.6

49

Glutathione S-Transferase-A1 (human hepatic) Glutathione S-Transferase-C1 (human hepatic) Glutathione S-Transferase-C2 (human hepatic) 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 binding protein (rat) Insulin (bovine) /3-1actamase (class C) (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)-I

5.4

7.1

- 1.7

50

9.0

7.5

1.5

50

8.7

7.3

1.4

50

4.58

4.93

-0.35

51

4.88 8.0

5.72 8.7

-0.84 -0.7

47 52

/3-1actamase (class C) (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)-2

7.7

8.3

-0.6

52

/3-1actamase (class C) (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)-3

7.6

8.2

-0.6

52

/3-1actamase (class C) (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)-4 /3-1actoglobulin A (ovine) /3-1actoglobulin A (ovine) /3-1actoglobulin A

7.3

7.6

-0.3

52

5.2 4.8 4.34

5.8 5.8 5.14

-0.6 - 1.0 -0.8

53 53 47

/3-1actoglobulin B

4.48

5.31

-0.83

47

Leucine enkephalin Methionine-enkephalin

5.61 5.58

5.50 5.40

0.11 0.18

47 47

Protein

12

287

CHROMATOFOCUSING

TABLE 3

(Continued)

Protein

Myoglobin-1 (sheep heart) Myoglobin-2 (sheep heart) Pore-forming protein (murine lymphocyte) S-hexylglutathione-binding protein (30 kDa) (human hepatocellular carcinoma) Soybean agglutinin isolectin-1 Soybean agglutinin isolectin-2 Soybean agglutinin isolectin-3

Elution pH chromatofocusing

determined by IEF

Difference (elution pH-IEF value)

7.9 8.1 4.7

7.4 7.16 6.4

0.5 0.94 -1.7

54 54 55

4.9

5.8

-0.9

56

6.7 6.3 6.0

7.0 6.85 6.7 Average of Absolute Values

-0.3 -0.55 -0.7 0.76

57 57 57

Average (keeping sign) SD

-0.085

pl

Reference

0.87

_

~. 1 . 5 1LIJ , 0.5u. m

z: Q. O"o -0.5 -

.~,

-1

-

m -1.5 -2 4.00

5.00

G.()0

IEF pl

F I G U R E 9 Plot of (elution pH minus IEF pl (y value)) versus (IEF pl (x value)) for various proteins determined in studies comparing anion-chromatofocusing elution pH and IEF pl (from Table 3).The least-squares regression line (solid line) through the data is plotted and is y = 0 . 1 4 1 7 x - 1.01 I with r 2 - 0.026812.

Another possible cause for the discrepancy of the elution pH compared with the IEF pI is the Donnan potential of the ion exchanger which leads to different equilibrium pH values in the same column segment for the mobile and stationary phases. The buffer interaction model assumes that these pH values are the same. 1,2 The Donnan potential,

288

D.ANDERSON

whose magnitude decreases and then reaches a plateau with increasing mobile-phase buffer concentration, 2 causes the pH of the mobile phase to be less than the pH of the stationary phase in a particular column segment (this is for anion-exchange columns; the opposite is observed for cation-exchange columns). Therefore, when the stationary phase reaches the pH -- pI of the protein, the protein changes to a net zero charge and is desorbed into the mobile phase. The mobile phase is at a lower pH than the corresponding stationary-phase segment. Thus, the protein will elute from the column at this lower mobile phase pH. However, the higher pH of the stationary-phase segment from which the protein originally desorbed is a truer reflection of the protein's pI. Thus, for anion chromatofocusing, there is a decrease in elution pH from the protein's pI value due to the Donnan potential. Other possible reasons for deviations from pI are a mixed retention mechanism on ion-exchangers, such as hydrophobic retention 6~ and anion concentration elution effects. 8

B. Peak Widths

Peak widths at half-height for proteins have been reported as 0.06-0.09 pH units for the conventional technique and 0.02-0.15 pH units for the gradient technique. 8 Peak width is dependent on the pH gradient slope and buffer concentration. Shallower pH gradients produce the narrowest peaks widths (pH units) in gradient chromatofocusing. 8 Greater focusing of protein peaks (in terms of pH width) occurs at low buffer concentrations and high Donnan potentials in conventional chromatofocusing. 1,2 Decreased buffer concentration leads to narrowing of the protein peak (pH units) by decreasing the slope of the pH gradient and by increasing the Donnan potential of the ion exchanger.1 The Donnan potential can also be increased by using high-capacity ion exchangers. 1 It should be realized, however, that the more shallow the pH gradient the more the dilution of the protein peak, since it is eluted over a longer time period. Theoretically, peak width is independent of flow rate, 2 as has been experimentally verified. 2 However, another study showed decreased resolution with increased flow rate. 46

V. APPLICATIONS

Chromatofocusing is frequently used in protein purification as one in a series of chromatographic steps. Chromatofocusing is often used in conjunction with one or more other non-denaturing chromatographic techniques in protein purification. The other chromatographic techniques include gel filtration (size-exclusion), regular salt-elution ion exchange,

12

289

CHROMATOFOCUSING

TABLE 4 Separation of Multiple Protein Forms and Multiple Proteins by Conventional Chromatofocusing

]3-D-N-acetylglucosaminidase (lysosomal isozymes A, I1, I2, B)62 Acid phosphatase (rat) (prostate, 8 isoforms; seminal 5 isoforms) 63 oe-fetoprotein (bovine, 7 isoforms; human, 3 isoforms) 64 Apolipoproteins (human HDL, 8 peaks)6S; (ApoB, ApoA-I, ApoC-II)66; (human VLDL, 7 peaks)67,68; (human VLDL, C-II, C-III0, C-III1, C-III2) 69 Creatine kinase (MM isoforms) TM Crystalline subunits, lens 71 Cytochrome P-450 (mouse liver, 8 isoforms72; rat liver, 21 fractions 73) Ferritin (rabbit liver isoforms) TM

IFN-ce(human, 5 peaks) 9~ Interleukin-2 (human, 4 peaks) 91 Interleukin-1 1392 ]3-Lactamase (Bacillus cereus, I, II, and others) 93

Luteinizing hormone (ovine, 13 isoforms94; human, 3 peaks 95) Phospholipase A (rat liver, lysosomal, 5 isoenzymes) 96 Prolactin (rat, 5 variants) 97 Prostate-specific antigen (free PSA (several isoenzymes) and complexed PSA)98 Serum proteins 99

Follicle-stimulating hormone (human isoforms75; rat, 11 components 76) Galactosyltransferase (human, 11 peaks) 77 Steroid receptor proteins (estrogen receptors) 100,101 Glutathione S-transferase (rat brain, Thyroid-hormone-binding globulin (human, 12 forms78; human liver, 13 forms79; isoforms) 1~ rat liver, 7 isoenzymes8~ Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Thyroid-stimulating hormone (human, 4-6 dehydrogenase (Jaculus orientalis, peaks; 1~ ovine, >9 isohormonesl~ bovine muscle, 3 isoforms) 81 deglycosylated, _>3 peaks TM) Hemoglobin (human, metHb, 2 Hb Transferrin (human, carbohydrate-deficient valence intermediates, oxygenated glycoprotein syndrome, 3 isoforms) l~ Hb82; human S, A0, F0, F183) Hexokinase (yeast isoenzymes PI UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (human liver, and PlI) 84 2 isoenzymesl~ rat liver, isoforms a~ Human chorionic gonadotropin Virus capsid proteins (foot-and-mouth (isoforms) 8s disease, VP1, VP2, VP3, VP0)1~ Immunoglobulins (murine monoclonal Fab'86; human IgA, IgM, IgG87; clonotypic antibodies88; IgG89)

hydroxylapatite, affinity, and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Chomatofocusing is also used to separate multiple protein samples and multiple forms of proteins. Published examples of the separation of multiple proteins or multiple forms of a protein by chromatofocusing are given in Table 4. 62-1~ Many of the isoforms listed in Table 4 are different glycoforms of the proteins. Chromatofocusing studies characterizing glycoforms

290

D. ANDERSON

of proteins include follicle-stimulating hormone glycoforms, 1~ human chorionic gonadotropin glycoforms, 11~ liver and hepatoma sialoglycoproteins, 111 and various sialoglycoproteins, a12 Other general types of separations accomplished by chromatofocusing include the separation/ purification of phosphorylated proteins, 113-116iodinated peptides, 117deamidated forms of proteins, a18 and membrane proteins, a~9,~2~ Chromatofocusing has been used in several proteomic studies. Lubman and co-workers 121-124have been on the forefront of this application of chromatofocusing. In these studies, two-dimensional chromatographic analysis was done, in which chromatofocusing is used in a first dimension pI-based fractionation (pI characterization), with each fraction then subsequently separated on a second-dimension reversedphase column (hydrophobicity characterization). This was then followed by a mass spectrometric analysis (molecular weight characterization) of the separated proteins. The technique was used in the profiling of human breast cancer whole cell lysates, 12i comparing the protein expression map of virulent and non-virulent E. coli, 122 and comparing the protein expression of untreated and drug-treated human colon adenocarcinoma cells, a23 It has also been employed by Lubman and co-workers to make protein microarrays, in which fractions from the two-dimensional chromatographic separation are deposited on nitrocellulose slides subsequently used to characterize humoral response in cancer.124 In a different proteomic study, approximately 125 proteins from Haemophilus influenzae were identified in chromatofocusing fractions. 12s The twodimensional technique has been commercialized by Beckman-Coulter as their ProteomeLab T M PF 2D system.

REFERENCES 1. Sluyterman, L. A. A. and Elgersma, O. Chromatofocusing: isoelectric focusing on ionexchange columns. I. General principles. J. Chromatogr. 150:17-30, 1978. 2. Sluyterman, L. A. A. and Wijdenes, J. Chromatofocusing: isoelectric focusing on ionexchange columns. II. Experimental verification. J. Chromatogr. 150:31-44, 1978. 3. Sluyterman, L. A. A. and Wijdenes, J. Chromatofocusing. III. The properties of a DEAEagarose anion exchanger and its suitability for protein separations. J. Chromatogr. 206:429-440, 1981. 4. Sluyterman, L. A. A. and Wijdenes, J. Chromatofocusing. IV. Properties of an agarose poly(ethyleneimine) ion exchanger and its suitability for protein separations. J. Chromatogr. 206:441-447, 1981. 5. Leaback, D. H. and Robinson, H. K. Ampholyte displacement chromatography- a new technique for the separation of proteins illustrated by the resolution/~-N-acetyl-D-hexosaminidase isoenzymes unresolvable by isoelectric focusing or conventional ionexchange chromatography. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 67:248-254, 1975. 6. Liu, Y. and Anderson, D. J. Gradient chromatofocusing high-performance liquid chromatography. I. Practical aspects. J. Chromatogr. A 762:207-217, 1997. 7. Liu, Y. and Anderson, D. J. Gradient chromatofocusing high-performance liquid chromatography. II. Theoretical aspects. J. Chromatogr. A 762:47-54, 1997.

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

291

8. Shan, L. and Anderson, D. J. Gradient chromatofocusing. Versatile pH gradient separation of proteins in ion-exchange HPLC: characterization studies. Anal. Chem. 74:5641-5649, 2002. 9. Ivanov, A. V. and Nesterenko, E N. Generation and application of pH gradients in liquid chromatography. J. Anal. Chem. (transl. Zh. Anal. Khim.) 54:494-510, 1999. 10. Giri, L. Chromatofocusing. In Guide to Protein Purification (Methods Enzymol., 182), (Deutscher, M. E, Ed.) Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 380-392, (1990). 11. Sluyterman, L. A. A. and Kooistra, C. Ten years of chromatofocusing: a discussion. J. Chromatogr. 470:317-326, 1989. 12. Mohammad, J. Chromatofocusing. In Purifying Proteins for Proteomics (Simpson, R. J., Ed.) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY, pp. 355-379, 2004. 13. Mantle, T. J. and Noone, P. Chromatofocusing. In Protein Purification, 2nd ed., (Methods in Mol. Biol., 244), pp. 233-237, 2004. 14. Luka~in, R. and Deppert, W. R. Chromatofocusing. In Protein Liquid Chromatography (J. Chromatogr. Libr. 61), (Kastner, M., Ed.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 385-414, 2000. 15. Hutchens, T. W. Chromatofocusing. In Protein Purification: Principles, HighResolution Methods, and Applications, 2nd ed. (Janson, J.-C. and Ryd~n, L., Eds.) W-VCH, New York, pp. 207-238, 1998. 16. Li, C. M. and Hutchens, T. W. Chromatofocusing. In Practical Protein Chromatography (Methods in Mol. Biol, 11) (Kenney, A. and Fowell, S., Eds.) Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp. 237-248, 1992. 17. Chromatofocusing with Polybuffer and PBE Handbook, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 18-1140-62. 18. At Amersham Biosciences website www4.amershambiosciences.com. Articles are entitled: "Buffer systems for broad pH intervals in chromatofocusing" and "Buffer systems for narrow pH intervals in chromatofocusing". 19. Hearn, M. T. W. and Lyttle, D. J. Buffer-focusing chromatography using multicomponent electrolyte elution systems. J. Chromatogr. 218:483-495, 1981. 20. Frey, D. D., Barnes, A. and Strong, J. Numerical studies of multicomponent chromatography using pH gradients. AIChE J. 41:1171-1183, 1995. 21. Frey, D. D. Local-equilibrium behavior of retained pH and ionic strength gradients in preparative chromatography. Biotechnol. Prog. 12:65-72, 1996. 22. Strong, J. C. and Frey, D. D. Experimental and numerical studies of the chromatofocusing of dilute proteins using retained pH gradients formed on a strong-base anionexchange column. J. Chromatogr. A 769:129-143, 1997. 23. Bates, R. C. and Frey, D. D. Quasi-linear pH gradients for chromatofocusing using simple buffer mixtures: local equilibrium theory and experimental verification. J. Chromatogr. A 814:43-54, 1998. 24. Narahari, C. R., Strong, J. C. and Frey, D. D. Displacement chromatography of proteins using a self-sharpening pH front formed by adsorbed buffering species as the displacer. J. Chromatogr. A 825:115-126, 1998. 25. Bates, R. C., Kang, X. and Frey D. D. High-performance chromatofocusing using linear and concave pH gradients formed with simple buffer mixtures. I. Effect of buffer composition on the gradient shape. J. Chromatogr. A 890:25-36, 2000. 26. Kang, X. and Frey, D. D. Chromatofocusing using micropellicular column packings with computer-aided design of the elution buffer composition. Anal. Chem. 74:1038-1045, 2002. 27. Emond, J. E and Pag6, M. An approach to ampholyte displacement chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 200:57-63, 1980. 28. Murel, A., Vilde, S., Pank, M., Shevchuk, I. and Kirret, O. Chromatophoresis: a new approach to the theory and practice of chromatofocusing. I. General principles. J. Chromatogr. 347:325-334, 1985. 29. Murel, A., Vilde, S., Pank, M., Shevchuk, I. and Kirret, O. Chromatophoresis: a new approach to the theory and practice of chromatofocusing. II. Experimental verification. J. Chromatogr. 362:101-112, 1986.

292

D. ANDERSON

30. S6derberg, L., Lfifis, T. and Low, D. Chromatofocusing: a new high-resolution method for protein fractionation. Protides Biol. Fluids 29:955-960, 1981. 31. Siden, A., Gallo, P. and Olsson, O. Broad pH-gradient chromatofocusing. Protides Biol. Fluids 33:555-558, 1985. 32. Hutchens, T. W., Li, C. M. and Besch, P. K. Development of focusing buffer system for generation of wide-range pH gradients during high-performance chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 359:157-168, 1986. 33. Jungbauer, A., Tauer, C., Wenisch, E., Uhl, K., Brunner, J., Purtscher, M., Steindl, E and Buchacher, A. Isolation of isoproteins from monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins by chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 512:15%163, 1990. 34. Vincent, N. D. and Cummins, P. Isolation of cardiac myosin light-chain isotypes by chromatofocusing. Comparison of human cardiac atrial light-chain 1 and fetal ventricular light-chain 1. Eur. J. Biochem. 148:135-143, 1985. 35. Faegerstam, L. G., Lizana, J., Axioe-Fredriksson, U. B. and Wahlstroem, L. Fast chromatofocusing of human serum proteins with special reference to al-antitrypsin and Gc-globulin. J. Chromatogr. 266:523-532, 1983. 36. Rabilloud, T., Barzaghi, B. and Righetti, P. G. Use of polybuffer as carrier ampholytes in mixed-bed immobiline gels for isoelectric focusing. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 16:237-241, 1988. 37. Vesterberg, O. Synthesis and isoelectric fractionation of carrier ampholytes. Acta Chem. Scand. 23:2653-2666, 1969. 38. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric Focusing: Theory, Methodology and Applications (Lab. Tech. Biochem. Mol. Biol.) (Work, T. S. and Burdon, R. H., Eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983. 39. Hutchens, T. W., Li, C. M. and Besch, P. K. Performance evaluation of a focusing buffer developed for chromatofocusing on high-performance anion-exchange columns. J. Chromatogr. 359:169-179, 1986. 40. Hutchens, T. W., Li, C. M. and Besch, P. K. A nonpolymeric focusing buffer of defined chemical composition developed for chromatofocusing. Protides Biol. Fluids 34: 765-768, 1986. 41. Kang, X., Bates, R. C. and Frey, D. D. High-performance chromatofocusing using linear and concave pH gradients formed with simple buffer mixtures II. Separation of proteins. J. Chromatogr. A 890:37-43, 2000. 42. Podgornik, H. and Podgornik, A. Separation of manganese peroxidase isoenzymes on strong anion-exchange monolithic column using pH-salt gradient. J. Chromatogr. B 799:343-347, 2004. 43. Hirose, A. and Ishii, D. Micro-column chromatofocusing. I. Use of a 10-~m diethylaminoethyl anion exchanger. J. Chromatogr. 387:416-419, 1987. 44. Shan, L. and Anderson, D. J. Effect of buffer concentration on gradient chromatofocusing performance separating proteins on a high-performance DEAE column. J. Chromatogr. A 909:191-205, 2001. 45. Scott, J. H., Kelner, K. L. and Pollard, H. B. Purification of synexin by pH step elution from chromatofocusing media in the absence of ampholytes. Anal. Biochem. 149, 163-165, 1985. 46. Hjert~n, S. and Li, J.-P. High-performance chromatofocusing of proteins on agarose columns. I. Macroporous 15-20 ~tm beads. J. Chromatogr. 475:167-175, 1989. 47. Shamoon, J. M. and Davies, I. A. I. Separation of the enkephalins from proteins in an aqueous medium by chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 314:499-505, 1984. 48. Huang, T. J., Trakshel, G. M. and Maines, M. D. Detection of 10 variants of biliverdin reductase in rat liver by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 7844-7849, 1989. 49. Vaidya, H., Dietzler, D. N., Leykam, J. E and Ladenson, J. H. Purification of five creatine kinase-MM variants from human heart and skeletal muscle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 790, 230-237, 1984. 50. Sugimoto, M., Takikawa, H., Stolz, A. and Kaplowitz, N. Subunit heterogeneity of cationic human hepatic glutathione S-transferases. Pharmacology 35:65-78, 1987.

12 CHROMATOFOCUSING

29~

51. Okano, T., Masuda, S., Ishimine, M., Murai, J., Yamamoto, Y. and Kobayashi, T. Comparison of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-binding proteins from rat lymph and plasma. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 31:4022-4028, 1983. 52. Walther-Rasmussen, J. and Hoiby, N. Hydrophobic character of surface regions and total hydrophobicity of four variants of chromosomal class C [3-1actamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa are identical. Chromatographic comparison of the hydrophobic character of the variants and the effect of focusing buffer composition on the separation of the variants by chromatofocusing with internal and external pH gradients. J. Chromatogr. B 746:161-172, 2000. 53. Fern~ndez-Espl~, M. D., L6pez-G~lvez, G. and Ramos, M. Isolation of ovine [3-1actoglobulin genetic variants by chromatofocusing: heterogeneity of ]3-1actoglobulin A. Chromatographia 37:43-46, 1993. 54. Wu, J. T., Pieper, R. K., Wu, L. H. and Peters, J. L. Isolation and characterization of myoglobin and its two major isoforms from sheep heart. Clin. Chem. 35:778-882, 1989. 55. Persechini, P. M. and Young, J. D.-E. The primary structure of the lymphocyte poreforming protein perforin: partial amino acid sequencing and determination of isoelectric point. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 156:740-745, 1988. 56. Kajihara-Kano, H., Hayakari, M., Satoh, K., Tomioka, Y., Mizugaki, M. and Tsuchida, S. Characterization of S-hexylglutathione-binding proteins of human hepatocellular carcinoma: separation of enoyl-CoA isomerase from an Alpha class glutathione transferase form. Biochem. J. 328:473-478, 1997. 57. Mandal, D. K., Nieves, E., Bhattacharyya, L., Orr, G. A., Roboz, J., Yu, Q.-T. and Brewer, C. E Purification and characterization of three isolectins of soybean agglutinin. Evidence for C-terminal truncation by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Eur. J. Biochem. 221:547-553, 1994. 58. Regnier, E E. The role of protein structure in chromatographic behavior. Science 238:319-323, 1987. 59. Kopaciewicz, W., Rounds, M. A., Fausnaugh, J. and Regnier, E E. Retention model for high-performance ion-exchange chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 266:3-21, 1983. 60. Melander, W. R., E1 Rassi, Z. and Horv~th C. Interplay of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in biopolymer chromatography. Effect of salts on the retention of proteins. J. Chromatogr. A 469:3-27, 1989. 61. Heinitz, M. L., Kennedy, L., Kopaciewicz, W. and Regnier, E E. Chromatography of proteins on hydrophobic interaction and ion-exchange chromatographic matrixes: mobile phase contributions to selectivity. J. Chromatogr. 443:173-182, 1988. 62. Goi, G., Fabi, A., Lombardo, A., Bairati, C., Bovati, L., Burlina, A. B., Agosti, S., Serio, C. and Tettamanti, G. The lysosomal [3-D-m-acetylglucosaminidase isozymes in human plasma during pregnancy: separation and quantification by a simple automated procedure. Clin. Chim. Acta 179:327-340, 1989. 63. Rytoluoto-Karkkainen, R., Jauhiainen, A. and Vanha-Perttula, T. Comparison of acid phosphatases in the rat prostatic complex and seminal vesicles. J. Urol. 132:814-820, 1984. 64. He, Y. and Keel, B. A. Biochemical characterization of bovine alpha-fetoprotein and comparison with human alpha-fetoprotein. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part B. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 108B:327-336, 1994. 65. Knipping, G., Steyrer, E. and Holasek, A. Chromatofocusing of apolipoproteins from human serum high density lipoproteins. Int. J. Biochem. 16:1149-1154, 1984. 66. Jauhiainen, M., Laitinen, M., Marniemi, J., Liippo, K., Penttila, I. and Hietanen, E. Preparation of soluble apolipoproteins A-I, B, and C-II by a chromatofocusing column method, and evaluation of their concentrations in serum in pulmonary disease. Clin. Chem. 29:1731-1735, 1983. 67. Weisweiler, P., Friedl, C. and Schwandt, P. Fast protein chromatofocusing of human very-low-density lipoproteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 875:48-51, 1986. 68. Jauhiainen, M. Fractionation of apolipoproteins from human serum very-low-density lipoproteins by chromatofocusing. Int. J. Biochem. 14:415-420, 1982.

294

D. ANDERSON

69. Huff, M. W. and Strong, W. L. P. Separation and isolation of human apolipoproteins C-II, C-III0, C-III1, and C-III2 by chromatofocusing on the fast protein liquid chromatography system. J. Lipid Res. 28:1118-1123, 1987. 70. Abendschein, D. R., Fontanet, H. L. and Nohara, R. Optimized preservation of isoforms of creatine kinase MM isoenzyme in plasma specimens and their rapid quantification of semi-automated chromatofocusing. Clin. Chem. 36:723-727, 1990. 71. Body, P. and Bloemendal, H. Simultaneous separation of all lens crystallin subunits by chromatofocusing. FEBS Lett. 232:39-45, 1988. 72. Marriage, H. J. and Harvey, D. J. Resolution of mouse hepatic cytochrome P-450 isozymes by chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 354:383-392, 1986. 73. Pasanen, M. and Pelkonen, O. Resolution of multiple P-450 forms: separation of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase and aminopyrine N-demethylase-associated P-450 isoenzymes by chromatofocusing. Gen. Pharmacol. 16:361-366, 1985. 74. Frenkel, E. J., Van den Beld, B., Konig, B. W. and Marx, J. J. M. Preparative isolation of distinct molecular forms of rabbit liver ferritin using high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 135:489-494, 1983. 75. Walton, W. J., Nguyen, V. T., Butnev, V. Y., Singh, V., Moore, W. T. and Bousfield, G. R. Characterization of human FSH isoforms reveals a nonglycosylated 13-subunit in addition to the conventional glycosylated 13-subunit. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86: 3675-3685, 2001. 76. Blum, W. E P., Riegelbauer, G. and Gupta, D. Heterogeneity of rat FSH by chromatofocusing: studies on in-vitro bioactivity of pituitary FSH forms and effect of neuraminidase treatment. J. Endocrinol. 105:17-27, 1985. 77. Barbe, D., Gauduchon, P., Bar, E., Heron, J. E and Le Talaer, J. Y. Isoenzymic patterns of human galactosyltransferase from normal and cancer patients. Cancer Detect. Prev. 8:279-285, 1985. 78. Thyagaraju, K., Devi, K.N., Rao, A.D., Balaji, M., Hildenbrandt, G.R., Ramamurthi, R. and Reddy, C.C. Purification and characterization of 12 forms of rat brain glutathione s-transferases. J. Parasitol. Appl. Anim. Biol. 5:33-48, 1996. 79. Jagt, D. L. V., Hunsaker, L. A., Garcia, K. B. and Royer, R. E. Isolation and characterization of the multiple glutathione S-transferases from human liver. Evidence for unique heme-binding sites. J. Biol. Chem. 260:11603-11610, 1985. 80. Jensson, H., Aalin, E and Mannervik, B. Glutathione transferase isoenzymes from rat liver cytosol. Methods Enzymol. 113 (Glutamate, Glutamine, Glutathione, Relat. Compd.), 504-507, 1985. 81. Soukri, A., Valverde, E, Hafid, N., Elkebbaj, M. S. and Serrano, A. Characterization of muscle glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase isoforms from euthermic and induced hibernating Jaculus orientalis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1243:161-168, 1995. 82. Bolzacchini, E., Fermo, I., Rovida, E., Colombo, R. and Samaja, M. Separation of the valence intermediates of human hemoglobin by high-performance chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 397:233-237, 1987. 83. Alexander, N. M. and Neeley, W. E. Chromatofocusing of human hemoglobins. J. Chromatogr. 230:137-141, 1982. 84. Jacob, L., Beecken, V., Bartunik, L. J., Rose, M. and Bartunik, H. D. Purification and crystallization of yeast hexokinase isoenzymes: characterization of different forms by chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. 587:85-92, 1991. 85. Diaz-Cueto, L., Barrios-de-Tomasi, J., Timossi, C., Mendez, J. P. and Ulloa-Aguirre, A. More in-vitro bioactive, shorter-lived human chorionic gonadotropin charge isoforms increase at the end of the first and during the third trimesters of gestation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2:643-650, 1996. 86. Tarburton, J. P. and Halpern, S. E. Chromatofocusing studies involving a monoclonal Fab'. J. Nucl. Med. 33:2148-2153, 1992. 87. Waldrep, J. C. and Schulte, J. R. HPLC chromatofocusing of human immunoglobulins. J. Immunol. Methods 118:273-277, 1989.

12

CHROMATOFOCUSING

~-95

88. Endo, Y., Miyai, K., Hata, N. and Iijima, Y. Effect of pH on antigen binding by clonotypic antibodies with different isoelectric points. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 9:74-81, 1987. 89. Gallo, P., Olsson, O. and Siden, A. Small-column chromatofocusing of cerebrospinal fluid and serum immunoglobulin G. J. Chromatogr. 375:277-283, 1986. 90. Bodo, G. and Adolf, G. R. Formation of human IFN-alpha subtype mixtures by different human cells. Contrib. Oncol. 20 (Physiol. Pathol. Interferon Syst.) 134-141, 1984. 91. Gerard, J. P. and Bertoglio, J. Chromatofocusing as a tool for the characterization and partial purification of human interleukin-2. J. Immunol. Methods 55:243-251, 1982. 92. Wingfield, P. T., Graber, P., Rose, K., Simona, M. G. and Hughes, G. J. Chromatofocusing of N-terminally processed forms of proteins. Isolation and characterization of two forms of interleukin-1 beta and of bovine growth hormone. J. Chromatogr. 387:291-300, 1987. 93. Gal, S., Toth-Martinez, B. L. and Kiss, L. Use of chromatofocusing for separation of 13-1actamases. III. [3-Lactamases of the Bacillus cereus 569/H strain. J. Chromatogr. 264:170-173, 1983. 94. Zalesky, D. D., Nett, T. M. and Grotjan, H. E. Ovine luteinizing hormone: isoforms in the pituitary during the follicular and luteal phases of the estrous cycle and during anestrus. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3851-3856, 1992. 95. Snyder, P. J., Bashey, H. M., Gatewood, C. V. and Karowe, M. Characterization of human LH isohormones from fresh pituitary tissue. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 54:115-121, 1987. 96. Hostetler, K. Y., Yazaki, P. J. and Van den Bosch, H. Purification of lysosomal phospholipase A. Evidence for multiple isoenzymes in rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 257:13367-13373, 1982. 97. Briski, K. P., Swanson, G. N. and Sylvester, P. W. Size and charge heterogeneity of pituitary and plasma prolactin in the male rat. Neuroendocrinology 63:437-445, 1996. 98. Huber, P. R., Schmid, H.-P., Mattarelli, G., Strittmatter, B., Van Steenbrugge, G. J. and Maurer, A. Serum free prostate specific antigen: Isoenzymes in benign hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate. Prostate 27:212-219, 1995. 99. Young, J. L. The separation of serum proteins by chromatofocusing. Protides Biol. Fluids 30:611-614, 1982. 100. Hutchens, T. W., Dunaway, H. E. and Besch, P. K. High-performance chromatofocusing of steroid receptor proteins in the presence and absence of steroid. Investigation of steroid-dependent alterations in surface charge heterogeneity. J. Chromatogr. 327:247-259, 1985. 101. Boyle, D. M., Wiehle, R. D., Shahabi, N. A. and Wittliff, J. L. Rapid, high-resolution procedure for assessment of estrogen receptor heterogeneity in clinical samples. J. Chromatogr. 327:369-376, 1985. 102. Terasaki, T. and Pardridge, W. M. Differential binding of thyroxine and triiodothyronine to acidic isoforms of thyroid hormone binding globulin in human serum. Biochemistry 27:3624-3628, 1988. 103. Pickles, A. J., Peers, N., Robertson, W. R. and Lambert, A. Different isoforms of human pituitary thyroid-stimulating hormone have different relative biological activities. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 9:251-256, 1992. 104. Keel, B. A., Harms, R. L. and Amir, S. M. The charge characterization of native and deglycosylated thyrotropin. Endocr. Res. 16:151-163, 1990. 105. Yamashita, K., Ideo, H., Ohkura, T., Fukushima, K., Yuasa, I., Ohno, K. and Takeshita, K. Sugar chains of serum transferrin from patients with carbohydrate deficient glycoprotein syndrome. Evidence of asparagine-N-linked oligosaccharide transfer deficiency. J. Biol. Chem. 268:5783-5789, 1993. 106. Irshaid, Y. M. and Tephly, T. R. Isolation and purification of two human liver UDPglucuronosyltransferases. Mol. Pharmacol. 31:27-34, 1987. 107. Chowdhury, J. R., Chowdhury, N. R., Falany, C. N., Tephly, T. R. and Arias, I. M. Isolation and characterization of multiple forms of rat liver UDP-glucuronate glucuronosyltransferase. Biochem. J. 233:827-837, 1986.

2.96

D. ANDERSON

108. Murdin, A. D., Doel, T. R. and Spier, R. E. Isolation of capsid proteins of foot-andmouth disease virus by chromatofocusing. J. Virol. Methods 7:207-216, 1983. 109. Creus, S., Chaia, Z., Pellizzari, E. H., Cigorraga, S. B., Ulloa-Aguirre, A. and Campo, S. Human FSH isoforms: carbohydrate complexity as determinant of in-vitro bioactivity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 174:41-49, 2001. 110. Yoshimura, M., Pekary, A. E., Pang, X. P., Berg, L., Goodwin, T. M. and Hershman, J. M. Thyrotropic activity of basic isoelectric forms of human chorionic gonadotropin extracted from hydatidiform mole tissues. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 78:862-866, 1994. 111. Karaivanova, V., Ivanov, S. and Chelibonova-Lorer, K. Pattern of sialoglycoproteins obtained by chromatofocusing of chicken liver and hepatoma MC-29 microsomal preparations labeled in vivo with 3H-leucine and N-acetyl-14C-mannosamine. Cancer Biochem. Biophys. 12:275-282, 1992. 112. Burness, A. T. H. and Pardoe, I. U. Chromatofocusing of sialoglycoproteins. J. Chromatogr. 259:423-432, 1983. 113. Boesze-Battaglia, K., Kong, E, Lamba, O. P., Stefano, E P. and Williams, D. S. Purification and light-dependent phosphorylation of a candidate fusion protein, the photoreceptor cell peripherin/rds. Biochemistry 36:6835-6846, 1997. 114. Adamus, G., Arendt, A., Hargrave, P. A., Heyduk, T. and Palczewski, K. The kinetics of multiphosphorylation of rhodopsin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 304:443-447, 1993. 115. Aton, B. R. Illumination of bovine photoreceptor membranes causes phosphorylation of both bleached and unbleached rhodopsin molecules. Biochemistry 25:677-680, 1986. 116. Aton, B. R., Litman, B. J. and Jackson, M. L. Isolation and identification of the phosphorylated species of rhodopsin. Biochemistry 23:1737-1741, 1984. 117. Woloszczuk, W. Iodogen-catalyzed iodination of human calcitonin and Tyr(0)-katacalcin and purification of their mono- and di-iodinated derivatives by chromatofocusing. J. Immunol. Methods 90:1-6, 1986. 118. Oray, B., Yuksel, K. U. and Gracy, R. W. Separation of deamidated forms of triosephosphate isomerase by chromatofocusing. A comparison of chromatofocusing with column isoelectric focusing. J. Chromatogr. 265:126-130, 1983. 119. Lin, J. T., Schwarc, K. and Stroh, A. Chromatofocusing and centrifugal reconstitution as tools for the separation and characterization of the sodium cotransport systems of the brush-border membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 774:254-260, 1984. 120. Wakefield, L. M., Cass A. E. and Radda, G. K. Isolation of a membrane protein by chromatofocusing: cytochrome b-561 of the adrenal chromaffin granule. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 9:331-341, 1984. 121. Chong, B. E., Yan, E, Lubman, D. M. and Miller, E R. Chromatofocusing nonporous reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of proteins from human breast cancer whole cell lysates: a novel two-dimensional liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15:291-296, 2001. 122. Zheng, S., Schneider, K. A., Barder, T. J. and Lubman, D. M. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography protein expression mapping for differential proteomic analysis of normal and O157:H7 Escherichia coli. BioTechniques 35:1202-1208, 1210-1212, 2003. 123. Yan, E, Subramanian, B., Nakeff, A., Barder, T. J., Parus, S. J. and Lubman, D. M. A comparison of drug-treated and untreated HCT-116 human colon adenocarcinoma cells using a 2-D liquid separation mapping method based upon chromatofocusing PI fractionation. Anal. Chem. 75:2299-2308, 2003. 124. Yan, E, Sreekumar, A., Laxman, B., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Lubman, D. M. and Barder, T. J. Protein microarrays using liquid phase fractionation of cell lysates. Proteomics 3:1228-1235, 2003. 125. Fountoulakis, M., Langen, H., Gray, C. and Takacs, B. Enrichment and purification of proteins of Haemophilus influenzae by chromatofocusing. J. Chromatogr. A 806:279-291, 1998.

13

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSING METHODS C O R N E L I U S E IVORY

Department of Chemical Engineering,Washington State University, Pullman,WA 99164-2 710

I. INTRODUCTION A. Equilibrium-gradient Methods B. Alternative Electrofocusing Methods II. THEORY A. Generalized Theory B. IEF C. Velocity-gradient Focusing D. Electric Field-gradient Focusing E. Conductivity-gradient Focusing F. Temperature-gradient Focusing III. RESULTS A. Assumptions B. IEF C. Grad(U) Focusing D. Grad(E) Focusing E. Grad(cr) Focusing F. Grad(T) Focusing IV. DISCUSSION A. Scale B. Integrated Networks V. CONCLUSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

I. INTRODUCTION

A scientist setting up a core proteomics facility today would have little choice but to use isoelectric focusing (IEF) as one of the orthogonal steps in a multidimensional separations cascade preceding final analysis by mass spectrometry (MS). However, as more complex organisms with 9 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Handbook of Isoelectric Focusing and Proteomics D. Garfin and S. Ahuja, editors.

297

298

C.F.ivoRY a greater diversity of proteins and a larger dynamic range are analyzed, the shortcomings of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-D-PAGE) will coax scientists to move their protocols out of largeformat, cross-linked gels and into multiscale, networked channels filled with viscous fluids, e.g., buffered polymer solutions. Over the next few years the field will witness a shift to the chromatographies, which offer a cornucopia of orthogonal chemistries, straightforward sizing and relatively easy automation, but suffer from an Achilles' heel, i.e., they require both length and time to resolve peaks. To be specific, it may be difficult to adapt liquid chromatography to the short, microfluidic columns needed for the last fractionation dimensions of low-abundance proteins (LAP) while maintaining the peak capacities needed for systeomics. In addition to IEF which is influenced less by length, alternative electrofocusing methods (AFMs), which do not focus solutes at their isoelectric points (pI), may allow scientists to circumvent this limitation.

A. Equilibrium-gradient Methods The AFMs analyzed in this chapter are part of a subset of the equilibrium gradient methods (EGM; Figure 1) described by Giddings and Dahlgren, 1 which use an applied electric field or electric field gradient as at least one of the counterbalanced forces on a focused solute. A complete binary set of EGMs would consist of dozens of pairs of forces, some of which are mentioned by Giddings 2 in the context of field-flow fractionation (FFF) as well as myriad variations on isocratic and gradient-elution chromatographies, each paired against a second force, e.g., hydrodynamic. It is unlikely that all possible binary pairs have been discovered, much less exploited, at this time and it does not appear that any ternary EGMs have been reported in the literature to date, so this area may still be considered "immature" and therefore ripe for further development. The motivation for this chapter is to describe what is known about this emerging set of methods in the hope that "gadgeteers" and theorists will explore this frontier and thereby help scientists develop new tools for systems biology. As an aside, the reader should note that the use of the word "equilibrium" in EGM is not warranted since these systems are actually either in a steady state or a pseudosteady state, i.e., when the peak is moving but not changing shape. Still, Giddings' intent is made clear in his mathematical treatment of EGMs. B. Alternative Electrofocusing Methods Perhaps the most important instance of field-gradient electrofocusing was O'Farrell's invention 3 of counter-acting chromatographic electrophoresis (CACE) (Figure 2), in which he demonstrated that a protein

13

299

ALTERNATIVEELECTROFOCUSING METHODS

Motive "Force"

~.

~/

\

~

F~

at

L Rest~ k~"Force"

Force..

F I G U R E I AFMs are a subset of the EGMs in which solutes are driven to a unique focal point by applying a counteracting restoring gradient against a constant motive "force" Adapted from Giddings and Dahlgren. I

could be focused to concentrations in excess of 100 mg/mL at the interface between two size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) gels by directing the electrophoretic migration of that protein against the step change in the chromatographic flow which occurred at that interface. To do this he placed several centimeters of low molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) SEC packing, Bio-Rad P-10 polyacrylamide gel, above a length of high MWCO SEC packing. Bio-Rad A-50 m agarose gel, directed the flow of 10 mM Tris acetate buffer at p H - 7 . 4 down through these packings at a nominal superficial velocity, U--~0.44cm/min, and directed a nominal electric field, E-~12 V/cm, so that the target solute, ferritin, and other proteins would migrate against the flow of buffer. 4 Since the protein could not enter the P-10, it moved through the packing with the interstitial velocity, U/e, where the void fraction e is typically about 0.4 in soft gels. In the lower part of the column the protein could access virtually all of the interior volume of the A-50 m and would move at a lower apparent velocity --~U. This opened a range of values of the applied electric field U/l.t<E < U/el.t, where # is the electrophoretic mobility, which would allow the protein to collect at the interface between the two gels. Shortly thereafter, several groups published theoretical analyses 5 and experimental extensions 6,7 of this work, gradually elucidating the mechanism which allowed electrophoretic focusing without the use of pI-I gradients. Perhaps the most startling result to arise from the experimental work was that the focused protein concentrations routinely exceeded 100mg/mL and, in some experiments, appear to have approached 300 mg/mL in the interstitial space between the P-10 beads. The implication here was that, since CACE did not require the protein to focus at

300

C.F. IVORY

F I G U R E 2 CACE focuses a protein above the interface between two SEC packings where the upstream packing has a low KAV (accessible volume coefficient) while the downstream packing has a large KAV.The accessible volume coefficient is the fraction of a chromatographic packing that a solute can occupy. This opens up a window, i.e., a range of operating parameters, within which the protein has a focal point at the interface.Adapted from Gobie and Ivory. 7

its pI where solubility is generally lowest or in a very low conductivity ampholyte buffer, it could avoid the isoelectric precipitation that plagues IEF of complex biological solutions. The absence of a pH gradient also allowed that non-amphoteric solutes, e.g., some metabolites, and polynucleic acids, which depurinate at their pI, could be focused. The most important result from the theoretical analyses of that time was that CACE shared a common mathematical basis with IEF and that these techniques were part of an as yet undiscovered family of

13

301

ALTERNATIVEELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

electrofocusing techniques 8 which would, by mathematical association, also be members of the set of EGMs delineated by Giddings.

II. THEORY

Presenting a complete theory of electrophoresis that would embrace all potential electrofocusing EGMs is beyond the scope of this chapter. A treatment that covers IEF in detail is available in Mosher's Dynamics o f Electrophoresis 9 and in a series of subsequent papers 1~ by these authors as well as others 14-17 on this topic. However, to understand the underlying principles involved in the AFMs, one only needs to consider the component of the mass flux equation which is parallel to the electric field, mx i , =

- D i dCi d x + (Ux'i -1- l l i E x ) C i

= 0

(1)

where the electric field points along the x-axis, m x , i is the mass flux in the x direction, i.e., the mass flow through a channel per unit area, C i is the solute concentration of the focusing species, Ux, i is the chromatographic velocity of the solute,/l i is its electrophoretic mobility, and E x is the xcomponent of the electric field. D i is a dispersion coefficient that has the same units as a diffusion coefficient but which accounts for the effects of the convective velocity profile on band-broadening, e.g., Taylor dispersion. 18'19 Equation (1) accounts, in mathematical terms, for the different mechanisms by which the solute can move about in the channel: diffusion, convection, and electrophoresis. If the solute is focused and its concentration profile has reached a steady state, then since it is not moving in space, the solute flux is zero. The first term on the right-hand side of Equation (1) is a dispersive term which does not affect the location of the focused band but which does affect its breadth. A dispersive term is used in place of molecular diffusion because the focusing solutes move at different speeds depending on how close they are to fixed surfaces and this variation in speed often increases peak spreading. The terms inside the parentheses determine whether the solute will focus and they set the location of the focused band at the point where the sum of those terms vanishes. In order for a solute to focus at the unique point where the sum of terms in parentheses vanishes, at least one of the terms in parentheses must vary, usually in a monotonic gradient of some sort, and the slope of that gradient must force each solute toward its unique focal point. 2~ In physical terms this simply means that, if a solute is moved away from its focal point, the forces acting on it will drive it back to that point. If the slope of the gradient is wrong, then these forces would tend to defocus or spread the solute, a technique which might be useful for diluting or mixing solutes.

302

C.F.ivoRY

If we replace the electric field with the current density divided by the electrical conductivity, i.e., E x = ix~Or, and the electrophoretic mobility by charge times the absolute mobility, i.e., t.li--Zi(Di, then 9 --

i dx

+

(

ix)

g x , i -1- zi(Di--~ Ci -- 0

(2)

the flux equation explicitly shows five different parameters in parentheses that can be adjusted in order to focus charged solutes. The most familiar of these, IEF is a case where the fluid velocity is identically zero, Ux, i = O, and the charge zi which is a function of pH, vanishes at the pI values of the proteins. The term in the parentheses vanishes at the pI and this location becomes the focal point for a given protein. CACE corresponds to the case where the electrical term is constant but the chromatographic velocity Ux, i varies. As will be seen later, other variations on this theme hold the velocity constant against a gradient in the electric field. Even though the same fundamental equation (2) can be used to describe each of these different electrofocusing techniques, they yield subtly different expressions for the variance and the resolution that may give an advantage to one or the other in different situations. In the next section, the mathematical relations for the variance and resolution of several different real and hypothetical electrofocusing devices are derived and then compared to illustrate the relative advantages and disadvantages of each technique. The reader should keep in mind that the linear model, Equation (2), does not take into account non-linear, electrostatic coupling among the various ionic species in solution. Linear theory specifically ignores the constraint of local electroneutrality and, instead, assumes that the electric field is determined by the electrode voltages, geometry, and the bulk conductivity of the electrolyte in the separation channel while ignoring the response of the electrolyte ions to the electric field. Because of this, it is likely that other phenomena, which are overlooked in the linear theory, may allow the development of different protocols based on these or other parameters. For example, Equation (2) would not allow prediction of isotachophoresis (ITP) although it is likely that each of the AFMs can exhibit ITP-like behavior which would allow solutes to "stack" at high concentrations.

A. Generalized Theory

While Equation (2) can be used to describe most electrofocusing techniques, it can also be generalized to describe other EGMs like density-gradient centrifugation or gradient-elution chromatography. To do this, Equation (2) is rewritten in the generalized form mx i , =

- D ~dCi dx

+ ( - S~ x + I ) C

i = 0

(3)

13

ALTERNATIVEELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

393

where S i is a positive number which represents the slope of the sum of the "forces" acting on the solute and 1~is an intercept parameter which sets the location of the gradient. These two parameters may be varied independent of each other. Then the slope will determine the width of the focused peak and the resolution of any pair of peaks while the intercept will determine where in our channel the peak(s) will focus. Equation (3) may be integrated using separation of variables 21 and the resulting constant of integration may be determined by applying the integral constraint that a known mass M T of solute is focused in a chamber with cross-sectional area A c to get

MT / Si Ci=

A--7

( Si(x-xf, i)2)

2IrD i exp

-

2D i

(4)

.

Extracting spatial moments 22 from Equation (4) using the formula

mn,i = f xnCi dx

(5)

-oo

yields the location xf, i = m l , i / m o , i = Ills i and spatial variance Z 2= m 2 i l m o i - X f 2 = Di/S i of the peak. ran,i is the mathematical definition of t h e rt th peak moment; too, i is the zeroth moment of the peak concentration distribution and is a measure of the mass of solute in the focused peak; ml, i is the first peak moment and, when normalized by the zeroth moment, provides the mean or mass-average location of the peak; and m2,i is the second peak moment which is used in the above formula to calculate the spatial variance of the peak about its mean location. The square root of the variance, i.e., the standard deviation, is a measure of the width of the peak which is used in the formula below for the resolution. The doubly infinite range of the moment integrals, ( - % oo), is used since this provides a simple result that is an excellent approximation for each moment as long as the edges of the peak do not extend past the ends of the focusing apparatus. This simplification yields an approximate form for the resolution (Figure 3) of two solutes: xf, 1 - xf, 2

Rs'~ 1 / 2 ( W ~ + W 2 )

xf, 1 -

xf, 2

"~ 2(2'1+2'2)~

AI(S)

-

AS(l)

~/4Wi{S) 3

AI "~V4D~(S)

(6)

where the shorthand for the averages is (S)= (S lq-$2)/2 , (I) = (11+I2)/2, for the differences is k S = ( $ 1 - $ 2 ) , AI = (I1--I2), and the two assumptions have been made that (1) the dispersion coefficients for both solutes are equal and (2) (S)>>AS. The expression on the far right corresponds to the ideal case where the gradient is constant everywhere so that AS = 0. From this we see the classic result that the resolution is inversely proportional to the square root of the gradient for all EGMs described by flux equations that have the same form as Equation (3).

304

C.F. ivoRY

X1

Flow

Wl

l/

Electromigration

W2

F I G U R E 3 Resolving power of a focusing method can be estimated from Equation (6), where Ax = x z - x t is the distance between two stationary peaks and W~, W 2 are the baseline widths of those peaks.

F I G U R E 4 Isoelectric focusing in a PDMS MEMS channel. About I ng each of three naturally fluorescent proteins were loaded into a 2-cm-long separation channel and focused in broad-range (3-10) ampholyte.The channel width from bottom to top is 300 lim and its depth is 5 lim. I, allo-phycocyanin; 2, phycoerythrin, 3-5, green fluorescent protein.

B. IEF

This same approach can be applied to IEF (Figure 4) under the assumptions that the pH profile is linear and is known while the conductivity is constant and the velocity U is zero. Although there is a good deal of published work on non-linear IEF, which produces a more rigorous result, linearization allows us to compare each of the different AFMs on a common basis. Starting with Equation (2), we expand the charge zi in a Taylor series in the pH around its pI value and expand the pH in a series around the focal point xf, i. This yields dzi Zi

=

(pH-pIi) d(pH)

pH = pI i + ( x - x f , i)

(7a) pli

d(pH) [ dx xf,,

(7b)

13

305

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSlNG HETHODS

which, when combined into Equation (2), has a structure similar to Equation (3):

_D dCi ( i dx

-t-

(x-xf)

d(pH)

dx

dzi

d(pH)

COdx)ci= 0 ry

(8)

where the peak is located at its pI and the spatial variance is found to be (YD i

Z2 =

(9)

d(pH) dzi dx d(pH)c~ From these formulas, IEF resolution can be expressed as

l cOiix IAplI RIEF= 4

dz i

crD~ d(pH) d(pH)/dx

(10)

which is equivalent to the classic result given by Righetti. 23 Note that the resolution increases with increasing current density and decreases with increasing dispersion and/or conductivity. In fact, one of the reasons that PAGE gels often produce better results than capillaries is that the cross-linked gels reduce the diffusion coefficient of the solute in the gel more than they reduce its mobility. Finally, if the pH gradient is held constant in space, as would be the case with Immobilines | and a constant flow U is applied parallel to this gradient, e.g., as a result of electroosmosis, then this theory predicts that the target solutes will focus some distance away from their characteristic pI values.

C. Velocity-gradient Focusing Two extant examples of velocity-gradient focusing, CACE and the SepStack, 24 both rely on step changes in the apparent velocity Ui so they are not readily comparable with the other processes treated above which use continuous gradients. However, one can postulate a long channel in which one or more surfaces is a membrane, e.g., ultrafiltration (UF), which transmits solvent and small ions but retains larger target solutes (Figure 5). Assuming that a constant flux of buffer is drawn out of the separation channel though the membrane, and that a constant electric field is directed against the axial flow of buffer, a range of values of will exist which will cause the target solute to focus within the channel.

Jw

Ex

Ex

306

C.F. IVORY

Electromigration

Decreasing Flow

T T T T T T T T T T T ~ T T T T T T T t v

v

v

>

>

>-

hollow-fiber ultrafiltration or reverse osmosis membrane

F I G U R E 5 Velocity-gradient focusing, which is closely related to CACE, can be carried out in a hollow-fiber membrane where liquid is allowed to pass through the membrane, creating a gradient in the axial flow. Solutes are then focused using a fixed electric field as the counteracting force.

This electrofocusing system can be described by the flux equation

mxi _DdCi ( Qin "= i d x + wh

SwX )Ci--O

--~+laiE x

(11)

where Qin is the volumetric flow introduced into a rectangular channel and w and h are the width and height of the separation channel respectively; the membrane covers the width and length of the lower surface of the channel. In analogy with Equation (3), this model yields a spatial variance Zi2=hDi/Jw and resolution: Rvu=

IA/~I ~/hEZx 4 DJw

(12)

It is worth noting from Equation (12) that the resolution has an unusually strong electric field dependence and that the permeate flux Jw can be made arbitrarily small to improve resolution. D. Electric

Field-gradient

Focusing

There are a number of different ways in which the electric field or current density can be directly manipulated to yield a gradient, but the two that have been explored to date are (1) by shaping (Figure 6) the geometry of the electrode channel 2s,26 or (2) by using an array of individually adjustable electrodes. 27 Assuming that the separation channel is operated with a linear electric field, the flux can be expressed as

Nxi= _D i dCi [ Qin , dx + k, w h -

dEx

)

xlai--d-ff-x + laiEx x=0 Ci = 0

(13)

13

307

ALTERNATIVEELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

electromigration direction Low Electric Field Separation ~ Channel ~ _ _ Flow ~,~ , dialysis membranes~

High Electric Field

Coolant focused solutes F I G U R E 6 EFGF was originally performed in a chamber with a fluted purge or coolant channel.The separation channel has a fixed cross-sectional area and is in contact with the coolant channel by means of a m e m b r a n e which passes current but does not pass fluid, e.g., a dialysis m e m b r a n e . T h e Achilles' heel of the EFGF methods is the m e m b r a n e which may be difficult to install, especially in microscale channels. Adapted from Koegler and Ivory. zs

from which, by analogy with Equation (3), the focal point, spatial variance and the resolution are

xf =

(Qin/wh ) + liiEx x=0 l~i[dEx/dx ]

oi[ ~ x] -1

2'2= ~

lAP[ (Qin/wh) REFGF= 4(/~) ~/(l~)iDi[dEffdx]

(14a)

(14b)

(14c)

respectively. Here as before, the electric field gradient dE/dx may be made arbitrarily small to increase the resolution.

E. Conductivity-gradient Focusing Although simpler to set up, and run than EFGF, conductivity-gradient focusing (CGF or electromobility focusing (EMF)) is considerably more difficult to analyze mathematically because the salt gradient profile must first be determined and then used to estimate the electric field gradient. Consider a separation chamber composed of two channels, a separation

308

c.F. ivoRY

channel with height h, and a dialyzate channel with height d, each with width w, and separated by a membrane which passes current and electrolytes (Figure 7), but not liquid, e.g., a dialysis membrane. The dialyzate channel is rapidly flushed with low-conductivity buffer aa and so its conductivity is effectively constant, but the high-conductivity buffer metered into the separation channel is allowed to diffuse through the membrane, setting up a gradient that runs from the inlet conductivity to the purge conductivity in a non-linear fashion. The change in conductivity in the separation channel can be expressed as

Qin d(o'(x))

D~ d-----~--= h2 ((a(x))-o'a)

wh

1i where (o'(x))=~- o'(x, y) dy

(15)

where (or) is the conductivity averaged over the height of the separation channel. Equation(15) integrates to O'(X)) = ((O')0-- (Yd)e-(wDff hQin)x "Jr"(Yd

(16)

where ((Y)0is the inlet conductivity at x = 0 in the separation channel. The total current Ix, x is free to distribute itself between the two compartments and, since current will follow the path of least resistance between the separation and dialyzate channels, it generates an electric

Flow

/

I fleldp

-' Vl

~~

Electric Field

conductivity in separation channel

conductivity in purge channel

I

FIGURE 7 CGF uses mismatched conductivities between the separation channel and the purge or coolant channel to create an electric-field gradient. In this example, the coolant conductivity is small and constant while the separation channel inlet conductivity is large and varies exponentially over the length of the channel. Solute peaks focused near the inlet are sharp but poorly resolved while peaks focused nearer the outlet are generally better resolved.

i3

309

ALTERNATIVEELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

field in the form

Ex =

IT'x ( o'(x ))wh + crawd

(17)

Plugging this expression into the flux equation

mxi=_D '

dCi

(Qin

lAilT'x

IC i -- 0

( o'(x ))wh + crawd ]

wh

~dx +

(18)

yields a differential equation for the concentration profile which has the focal point

hQin[htAilT, Xf "----

wD---T In

-

x+(d+h)~

h((G(O))+Gd)Qi n

(19)

where, in order for xf to be a positive number so that our solute will focus within the channel, the range of operation of the focusing channel must be
Qin

(20)

Although it is possible to derive mathematical forms for the spatial variance and the resolution, the resulting expressions are unwieldy and simpler, approximate forms can be derived by expanding the term in parentheses in a Taylor series about the focal point to obtain

dC i mx, i = -Di--~x - O~i(x-xf)Ci = O where oei =

(hllilT, x + (d + h ) {yaQ in)

h3lAilT,x

D{~

(21)

which has spatial variance Zi2=Di/oei, and resolution Rv'~=

IXf,l--Xf,2l a la2 4 ~/D(a)3

(22)

While this formula is difficult to express in a way that makes it directly comparable with others, it can still be used as a basis for comparison when values of the separation parameters are supplied (see Table 1).

F. Temperature-gradient Focusing A recent addition to the AFMs is temperature-gradient focusing 28,29 in which an axial temperature gradient is used to provide a gradient in

310

C.F. IvoRy /

/

TABLE I Techniques

Theoretical Resolution and Peak Capacity of Alternative Focusing

Gradient

Resolution

Peak Capacity

Comment

pH (IEF)

ApH---0.013

Narrow range ampholyte

pH (IEF) U (CACE)

ApH---0.034 AF/---0.130 x 10 -4 cm2/Vs

E (EFGF)

A/I---0.18x 10-4 cm2/Vs

Cpeak"~" 80 Cpeak'~ 210 Cpeak'-"800 Cpeak'" 112

o" (CGF)

&/a---0.034 X 10 -4 cm2/Vs

Cpeak"~" 210

(/~)---1.0 x 10-4 cmZ/Vs

T (TGF)

A~/---0.006 x 10 -4 cm2/Vs

Cpeak'" 25

(/a)---1.0 x 10 -4 cm2/Vs; 40~

Broad range ampholyte (/1)-- 1.0 x 10 -4 cm2Ns (/~)---1.0 x 10-4 cmZ/Vs

F I G U R E 8 TGF uses an applied axial temperature gradient to vary the electric field and focus solutes.This technique, which does not require the use of a membrane or packing, may have some advantages for micro-scale application.

electrophoretic mobilities of the solute (Figure 8). At first glance this approach would appear to be limited by the range of temperatures amenable to the solvent and the solutes, e.g., for proteins AT<40~ but it has the important advantage in that it does not require a membrane in order to focus solutes and so may find application at MEMS scales when deployment of a membrane is difficult. It is important to note, from Equation (23), that if only temperatureinduced variations in the viscosity were considered to provide the focusing gradient, then this approach would not work well since the ratio/2/o" is nearly constant for water between 4~176 However, changing the temperature Nxi =

,

-D dQ {Qin [tli]IT,x~ i dx +~, wh

+L a J w h

] Ci= 0

(23)

can also change the buffer conductivity by changing the degree of ionization of the buffer electrolytes (as well as of the target solute) and this can be used as the basis for focusing. Ross and Locascio 28 have taken advantage of this approach to focus a number of analytes in a microchip format. Introducing a function f(T)

13

31 I

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

in the electrophoretic term which accounts for this shift in the electrophoretic velocity,

)

mx'i=-Di--~-x + t wh + -~ o-~ fiT(x)) Ci'- 0

(24)

where assuming that f is linear in T and that T is linear in x, the velocity function can be expressed as

(2s) with focal point, spatial variance and resolution

Qin[ o-]

xf =

-

df]

L Jo+,o[ Vj+ro _ [

F-~F]T-d-~]

(26a)

L dT]I_ dx _l

D[lloIT,x][ df 22=

IA['lo' / Rw=

dr]

~[ry0wh][dT dx

/

(Y~

2 IT x [ df dT]

(26b)

(26c)

4<#~ ~ D i(#o)~- [-d--~---~-xj Note that since Qin is limited by the electrophoretic velocity of the target solutes, it is coupled to the total current I T in such a way that resolution increases with VQ rather than Q. III. RESULTS

Table 1 shows a summary of the theoretical AFM resolutions, which are calculated from the respective formulas for resolution given in the text, and peak capacities, which are estimated by dividing the length of the separation chamber L by 4X, which is the approximate baseline width of a Gaussian peak. These results have been calculated for a specific set of parameters that pertain to microgram-scale focusing columns and which may not be relevant at different scales or for very different values of the parameters. Yet, these calculations provide a basis for comparison of these techniques and serve as a point of departure for the discussion which follows. The reader should note that, in addition to taking

312

c.F. IvoRY

the calculations with a grain of salt, each of these techniques may have other attributes which might afford it an advantage or disadvantage at this and other scales. It is also worthwhile noting that, with few exceptions, the results for the resolution and the peak capacity are fairly similar for all of these techniques, perhaps reflecting the fact that they have a common theoretical basis.

A. Assumptions In order to normalize results among the various techniques, the same parameters were used in all calculations unless a more reasonable value of a particular parameter was available for a given technique. Thus in all cases the separation column was assumed to be 10 cm long, 0.1 cm wide, 0.1 cm high, and free from packing, gels, or other stabilizing media or mechanisms. A maximum potential of 1000 V was placed at one end of the column and the other end was set to ground. The average mobility of the target solutes was assumed to be (~t)= 1.0x 10-4cm2/Vs and the dispersion coefficient of the target solute was set to D i = 1 • 10 -6 cm2/sec, which is large for proteins but small for low-molecular-weight solutes. All hydrodynamic flows were assumed to be constant across the width and height of the separation channel.

B. IEF For purposes of comparison, resolutions and peak capacities for broad- and narrow-range ampholyte IEF are included in Table 1. Here broad-range ampholytes were assumed to span the range 3 < pH < 10, and narrow-range ampholytes to span a single pH unit. While, in principle, it is possible to produce ampholyte pH gradients that form gradients less than 1 pH unit across, in practice this is rarely done and only a few verynarrow-range ampholyte mixtures are commercially available. Applying 1000 V across a 10 cm channel in the final stages of broadrange IEF generates (theoretical) peak capacities in excess of 200 and indicates that this technique has the ability to baseline-resolve amphoteric solutes whose pI values differ by more than 0.034 pH units. If these calculations are extrapolated either to gels, where the dispersion coefficient would be about 10 times smaller, or to capillaries where the nominal electric field and the channel length would be five time larger, it is clear that they significantly overpredict performance, suggesting either that some as-yet undiscovered sources of dispersion act on the focused peaks or that the linear theory does a mediocre job of predicting resolution in an inherently non-linear process. The calculations do correctly indicate that narrow-range IEF trades increased resolution against lower peak capacities, as do each of the

13

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSING METHODS

313

AFMs. More importantly, linear theory suggests that both resolution and peak capacity could be improved by decreasing dispersion relative to the absolute mobility, co, and by increasing the applied potential. The former is usually accomplished by adding a fixed or dynamic gel to the channel while the electric field can be increased until thermal or electrohydrodynamic effects cause resolution to deteriorate.

C. Grad(//) Focusing Velocity-gradient focusing, as depicted here, is a variation on CACE and also bears some resemblance to (hydrodynamic) flow field-flow fractionation. 3~ The theoretical calculations indicate that this technique will have a relatively poor resolving power in terms of differences in mobility but an enormous peak capacity in the configuration analyzed. This suggests that it could be a good technique to use for crude fractionation of complex mixtures where the range of electrophoretic mobilities was large and where an ultrafiltration or diafiltration step could also be useful. It should also be good at concentrating homogeneous peaks but, because of its low resolving power, would be a weak candidate for use in fractionating isoforms where the differences in mobilities of nearestneighbor isoforms would generally be expected to be less than about (p) = 0.1 x 10 -4 cm2N s. One can easily imagine a hollow-fiber ultrafiltration or reverse-osmosis module with electrodes built into the lumen manifold and segregated from the manifold by a low-molecular-weight dialysis membrane which allowed ionic current to pass but virtually no flow of liquid. The "shell" side of the fiber module would be flushed with electrolyte that served both to cool the fibers and to carry away UF/DF permeate. The "tube" side or lumen would be pressurized in the usual fashion and would carry an electric field to focus charged solutes against the resulting gradient in the hydrodynamic flow. An advantage of this configuration is that it would easily scale to very large mass capacities. A disadvantage is that the coefficient of variation of the fiber inner diameters would have to be made small enough that fiber-to-fiber variation, especially of the flow, would not cause excessive band spreading among the fibers. Scale would be achieved by increasing the number of fibers.

D. Grad(E) Focusing According to linear theory, electric field-gradient focusing (EFGF) will provide a resolution and peak capacity which is roughly intermediate between those predicted for narrow- and broad-range ampholytes. However, EFGF has the advantage that it can be carried out in a buffer of arbitrary composition, including native buffers, and that the electric field

314

C.F. ivoRY

and the hydrodynamic flow can be varied over the course of the run to resolve and/or elute target solutes. 2s,26,3~ In its more recent variation called DFGF, where the field is generated by a computer-controlled electrode array, 27 the electric field gradient profile may be manipulated on a point-by-point basis allowing local adjustment of the resolution and peak capacity in different parts of the separation channel. In this configuration, the local resolution can be raised in some parts of the channel to tease apart recalcitrant bands but reduced in other parts where higher resolution is not immediately needed and this can be done at any time during a run. The flexibility of DFGF is not reflected in the calculations of Table 1 since they were based on a static, linear electric field gradient with an electric potential ranging from 1000 V to ground.

E. Grad(o') Focusing CGF~32 which has also been called electromobility focusing, 33,34 exhibits a resolution and peak capacity which are comparable with broad-range IEF under the assumptions used in these calculations. In addition to the restrictions on the voltage, channel geometry, and electrophoretic mobilities, this calculation assumed that the buffer in the purge channel was 1/10 of the conductivity of the buffer introduced into the separation channel and it also assumed that the purge channel was flushed rapidly to maintain that low conductivity everywhere within the purge channel. This produces an exponential variation in the field gradient which makes this technique difficult to compare with the others but, in general, the calculations lead one to expect it would provide performance which is commensurate with the other AFMs. A couple of points worth noting are that the exponential field profile will provide high peak capacities near the inlet where the gradient is steep and high resolution near the outlet where the gradient is shallow. 33 If desired, the gradient can be made more nearly linear by using a counterflow of low-conductivity buffer in the purge channel at roughly the same flow velocity as in the separation channel, but in the opposite direction. However, if this is implemented, then the purge cannot be used to cool the separation channel since the flow would be too slow to carry away the Joule heat generated in the separation channel, so another means of cooling would have to be implemented.

F. Grad(T) Focusing Temperature-gradient focusing produced the highest resolving power at the lowest peak capacity. This is the end result of spreading a 40~ temperature excursion over the 10 cm separation channel used in these calculations and, while these numbers could be adjusted by using a different channel length, this result frames the weakness of this technique, i.e., that

13

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

315

the permitted temperature rise is limited by the lability of the target solutes. The reader is reminded that all electrophoresis techniques require careful attention to temperature excursions, AT = T2-T1, implying that this constraint is really only a matter of degree and will probably only limit its application at larger scales. At capillary, MEMS and smaller scales where large temperature gradients, VT, can be attained using small temperature excursions, AT, this approach to focusing may have important advantages over some other techniques. The low peak capacity goes hand-in-hand with the exquisite resolving power and should fall in line with the other techniques at small scales where steeper temperature gradients can be applied along the separation channel without producing large temperature excursions. IV. DISCUSSION

The calculations given above are intended to provide a common basis for comparison of some of the newer AFMs. In addition to this, they illustrate how these types of calculations are performed, how these various techniques could be or have been reduced to practice and, with any luck, have stimulated the reader to consider new AFMs or variations on the ones described here. The reader is reminded once again that these calculations are based on linearized electrophoresis models whose results may only be meaningful at low solute concentrations where ionic coupling may be ignored even though, in practice, these techniques generally yield solute peaks focused to concentrations in excess of 10 mg/mL where linear models no longer apply. There is a glaring need for robust electrophoresis simulations programs and, as numerical packages improve their ability to simulate non-linear electrophoresis, it is hoped that they can provide the tools needed to help explore new concepts in electrokinetics and to accurately design multidimensional, electrokinetic separations systems. A. Scale

Ampholyte-based IEF finds itself in an odd position relative to scale. While it is used effectively in PAGE 23,3s at mass loadings of 0.1-10t.tg, in capillaries and microchips at 0.1-100ng, and in free solution at 1-100 m g , 36-38 it is unlikely to be used at either larger or smaller scales. The limitation at large-scale stems from the expense of the ampholytes, their tendency to adsorb to proteins and their inability to focus non-amphoteric compounds. At the extreme small scales, e.g., subpicogram, needed for the final separation dimension(s) of an integrated proteomics nanochip, placement or delivery of the ampholytes presents an unnecessary complication since other media, e.g., Immobilines | or the alternative methods described

316

C.F.ivoRY

here could be used in a way that avoids these problems. Ampholyte-based IEF is also limited by the practical pH range of available ampholyte fractions. In free solution, operation outside the 3-10 pH range is challenging but high-resolution IEF with ~tpH < 0.5 is virtually impossible with commercially available ampholytes. This is not the case with the AFMs because the gradients used here are not fundamentally limited by chemistry, as is the case with commercial ampholytes, or by "delivery" constraints since they can be designed into separation microchannels at the location where they will be used. The alternative systems can, in principle, be designed with extremely shallow gradients having resolving power far in excess of ampholytebased IEE Furthermore, the AFM channels can be fabricated to include a pattern of gradients that are optimized for a given mixture or engineered for general-purpose use, e.g., a steep gradient for collecting peaks followed by a shallow gradient for resolving peaks. The only exception to this is temperature-gradient focusing which, for proteins, is limited to about AT---40~ for the steep gradients used to collect peaks but can still produce extremely shallow gradients. Many of the AFMs are amenable to increased scale. Work along these lines has already started for DFGF 27 and will likely be extended to conductivity- and velocity-gradient focusing over the next few years. For obvious reasons alluded to above, temperature-gradient focusing seems an unlikely candidate for large-scale processing but has been demonstrated at MEMS scales and may have important advantages at that scale. Finally, it is my opinion that CACE, and any other electrochromatography technique that relies on a granular packing for separation, will be difficult to bring to process scales, even with internal cooling coils. 7 At small scales, the electrochromatographies are challenged by packing issues, but these can be circumvented by using derivatized nanochannels, monoliths or in situ fabrication. B. Integrated Networks

The future of complex biochemical analyses, e.g., systeomics, lies in the integrated MEMS networks commonly referred to as "lab-on-a-chip." These chips will have to accept a "real-world" sample in, at the very least, 1 laL volume, pull out one or more targets and prepare them for detection. Low-abundance targets will have to be concentrated to produce an adequate signal at the detector and this requires that they be moved from a 1 ~tL volume down, perhaps, to a sub-picoliter volume, according to their relative abundance in the starting sample. Integration will allow a chip to apply a variety of unit operations, e.g., fractionation, reaction, dialysis, digestion, etc., to the sample components as they pass through the process cascade on their way to the

13

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

317

detector(s) but conventional wisdom currently holds that the HPLCs will not scale well below L = i mm because column length is required to resolve peaks. This stricture does not apply to solid-phase extraction or other on-off or "step" affinity chromatographies, but these techniques may be hampered by placement/delivery concerns if a packed bed is used. Although it is not immediately obvious from Equation (10), the resolving power of IEF is largely independent of channel length if the endto-end voltage drop across the channel is maintained as channel length is reduced. Since the electric field increases in inverse proportion to the channel length and the power density goes as the square of the field, the key design issue that arises is the temperature excursion but, if the effective channel diameter is reduced with E or faster, temperature excursions should not be a problem. These same properties appear to hold for the AFMs although again, this is not obvious from the formulas given for the various resolutions. However, if one notes that the axial flow in the channel and the current must be proportional to the electric field and that the electric field is inversely proportional to the channel length if the voltage drop is held constant, then the channel length drops out of each of these formulas just as it does for lEE This suggests that any of these electrokinetic focusing techniques could be used throughout the separation cascade as the channel diameters are reduced to accept the smaller volumes of concentrated, low-abundance solutes.

V. CONCLUSION While the development of AFMs radiates from O'Farrell's invention of CACE, 4 it is firmly grounded in the EGMs described in Giddings' classic paper.1 To date only a fraction of the possible variants of the alternative focusing techniques have been tested in the laboratory and all of these involve only a single field gradient along a single field-flow axis and using only electric fields and flows as the counteracting forces. In the near future, it is expected that this work will expand to include binary and then tertiary interacting field gradients followed shortly thereafter by multidimensional (spatial) gradients applied over electrode (or thermal, etc.) arrays, multidimensional (temporal) gradients and, eventually, multiple separation dimensions using orthogonal focusing methods.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This material is based upon work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grants DBI-0096745 and BES-9970972.

318

C.F. IVORY

REFERENCES

1. Giddings, J. C. and Dahlgren, K. Resolution and peak capacity in equilibrium--gradient methods of separation. Sep. Sci. 6(3):345-356, 1971. 2. Giddings, J. C. Unified Separation Science. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1991. 3. O'Farrell, P. H. Method of Isotope Enrichment, US patent 4290855 (1981). 4. O'Farrell, P. H. Separation techniques based on the opposition of two counteracting forces to produce a dynamic equilibrium. Science 227(4694):1586, 1985. 5. Hunter, J. B. Progress in Mathematical Modelling of CA CE, Vol. 23, Marcel Dekker, NY, p. 875, 1988. 6. Locke, B. R. and Carbonell, R. G. A theoretical and experimental study of counteracting chromatographic electrophoresis. Sep. and Purilc. Methods 18(1):1-64, 1989. 7. Gobie, W. A. and Ivory, C. E Continuous counter-acting chromatographic electrophoresis, Biotechnol. Prog. 6(1):21-32, 1990. 8. Ivory, C. E A brief review of alternative electrofocusing techniques, Sep. Sci. Technol. 35(11):1777-1793, 2000. 9. Mosher, R. A., Saville, D. A. and Thormann, W. The Dynamics o[ Electrophoresis. VCH Publishers, Inc., New York, 1992. 10. Mosher, R. A., Gebauer, P., Caslavska, J. and Thormann, W. Computer-simulation and experimental validation of the electrophoretic behavior of proteins. 2. Model improvement and application to isotachophoresis. Anal. Chem. 64(23):2991-2997, 1992. 11. Mosher, R. A., Gebauer, P. and Thormann, W. Computer-simulation and experimental validation of the electrophoretic behavior of proteins. 3. Use of titration data predicted by the proteins amino-acid-composition. J. Chromatogr. 638 (2):155-164, 1993. 12. Mosher, R. A. and Thormann, W. High-resolution computer simulation of the dynamics of isoelectric focusing using carrier ampholytes: the post-separation stabilizing phase revisited. Electrophoresis 23( 12):1803-1814, 2002. 13. Thormann, W., Huang, T., Pawliszyn, J. and Mosher, R. High-resolution computer simulation of the dynamics of isoelectric focusing of proteins. Electrophoresis 25(2):324-337, 2004. 14. Cao, C. X., Zhou, S. L., Qian, Y. T., He, Y. Z., Wang, C. R., Zheng, X. Y. and Chen, W. K. Investigations on factors that influence the moving neutralization reaction boundary method for capillary electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing. ]. Chromatogr. A 952(1-2):29-38, 2002. 15. Arnaud, I. L., Josserand, J., Rossier, J. S. and Girault, H. H. Finite element simulation of off-gel (TM) buffering. Electrophoresis 23(19):3253-3261, 2002. 16. Kim, S. H., Otani, R., Shirai, W., Shibasaki-Kitakawa, N., Kitakawa, A. and Yonemoto, T. Mathematical modeling of continuous separation process of proteins using partial recycling free-flow isoelectric focusing with feed supply and product withdrawal. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 27(2):174-180, 2001. 17. Cabrera, C. R., Finlayson, B. and Yager, P. Formation of natural pH gradients in a microfluidic device under flow conditions: model and experimental validation. Anal. Chem. 73(3):658-666, 2001. 18. Taylor, G. I. Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing through a tube. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 219:186-203, 1953. 19. Aris, R. On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 235:67-77, 1956. 20. McCoy, B. J. Counteracting chromatographic electrophoresis and related imposedgradient separation processes. AIChE ]. 32(9):1570, 1986. 21. Boyce, W. E. and DiPrima, R. C. Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1977. 22. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1965.

13

ALTERNATIVE ELECTROFOCUSlNG METHODS

319

23. Righetti, P. G. Isoelectric Focusing: theory, methodology and applications, Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, 1983. 24. Righetti, P. G., Faupel, M. and Wenisch, E. Preparative electrophoresis with and without immobilized pH gradients, In Advances in Electrophoresis (Chrambach, A., Dunn, M. J. and Radola, B. J. Eds.) VCH, New York, pp. 159-200, 1992. 25. Koegler, W. S. and Ivory, C. E Focusing proteins in an electric field gradient. J. Chromatogr. 229:229-236, 1996. 26. Koegler, W. S. and Ivory, C. E Field gradient focusing: a novel method for protein separation. Biotechnol. Prog. 12(6):822-836, 1996. 27. Huang, Z. and Ivory, C. E Digitally controlled electrophoretic focusing. Anal. Chem. 71(8):1628-1632, 1999. 28. Ross, D. and Locascio, L. E. Microfluidic temperature gradient focusing. Anal. Chem. 74(11):2556-2564, 2002. 29. Balss, K. M., Vreeland, W. N., Howell, P. B., Henry, A. C. and Ross, D. Micellar affinity gradient focusing: a new method for electrokinetic focusing. J. Am. Chem. Soc., ASAP Web Release (Communication), 2004. 30. Giddings, J. C., Yang, E J. E and Myers, M. N. Flow field-flow fractionation: a versatile new separation method, Science 193:1244-1245, 1976. 31. Wang, Q. G., Lin, S. L., Warnick, K. E, Tolley, H. D. and Lee, M. L. Voltage-controlled separation of proteins by electromobility focusing in a dialysis hollow fiber. J. Chromatogr. A 985(1-2):455-462, 2003. 32. Greenlee, R. D. and Ivory, C. E Protein focusing in a conductivity gradient. Biotechnol. Prog. 14(2):300-309, 1998. 33. Tolley, H. D., Wang, Q. G., LeFebre, D. A. and Lee, M. L. Equilibrium gradient methods with nonlinear field intensity gradient: a theoretical approach. Anal. Chem. 74(17): 4456-4463, 2002. 34. Wang, Q. G., Tolley, H. D., LeFebre, D. A. and Lee, M. L. Analytical equilibrium gradient methods. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 373(3):125-135, 2002. 35. Deutscher, M. P. Guide to Protein Purification. In Methods in Enzymology (Abelson, J. N. and Simon, M. I. Eds.) Academic Press, New York, 1990. 36. Bier, M. Rotating apparatus for isoelectric focusing. US patent 4588492 4588492, 1986. 37. Lubman, D. M., Kachman, M. T., Wang, H. X., Gong, S. Y., Yan, E, Hamler, R. L., O'Neil, K. A., Zhu, K., Buchanan, N. S. and Barder, T. J. Two-dimensional liquid separations-mass mapping of proteins from human cancer cell lysates. J. Chromatogr. B 782(1-2):183-196, 2002. 38. Wall, D. B., Kachman, M. T., Gong, S. Y. S., Parus, S. J., Long, M. W. and Lubman, D. M. Isoelectric focusing nonporous silica reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: a three-dimensional liquidphase protein separation method as applied to the human erythroleukemia cell-line. Rapid Commn. Mass Spectrom. 15(18):1649-1661, 2001.

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

INDEX

Accessible volume coefficient, 300 Acid-base titrations, 2 Acryclic microfluidic device, 200 Acrylamido buffer technology, 8 Acrylamido buffers, 5, 83-85, 152, 254 contributions to the buffering capacity, 84 recipes for, 85 Affinity chromatography, 251 Affinity cIEF, 203 Agarose gels, 77, 108-110, 171,258 advantages of, 108 electrode solutions for focusing in, 109, 110 electroendosmotic effects in, 109 electrophoresis, 167 IEF of neuraminidasetreated human sera in, 111 immunofixation, 110 preparation of, 109 silver staining of, 110

staining proteins in, 171 use in the IEF dimension, 170, 258 Agarose-urea gels, 109 Albumin concentration versus position, 50 Alkylated lysozyme, time course of mass spectra, 154 Alkylation, 154 efficiency, 151 Alternative electrofocusing methods (AFMs), 11,298, 310 theoretical resolution and peak capacity of, 310 Amine buffers, 276 Ammonium persulfate, 98 Ampholines TM, 25, 28, 74, 75, 100 Ampholyte-displacement chromatography, 265, 273 Ampholytes, 5, 22, 24, 26, 59, 66, 79, 275 accumulation/depletion of, 59 aggregation of, 79 background absorbance, 186

charged, 72 defined, 71 displacement, 274 generation of, 26 migration of, 79 mobility versus pH behavior of, 66 pH gradient, 185 properties of, 275 selection, 185 steady-state distributions of, 5, 59 train, 274 uncolored, synthetic, 24 variation in distributions, 184 Amphoteric compounds, 41, 46 electrophoretic velocity of, 46 separation of, 231 Amphoteric dyes, focusing of, 61 Amphoteric electrolytes, 21 Amphoteric molecules, fractionation of, 2 Amphoteric separands, 45, 46 electrophoteric transport of, 46

321

3~,,,

INDEX

sensitivity of the mobility to pH, 45 Amphoteric species, 43, 44, 67 conservation laws for, 67 conservation of, 44 diffusivity, 44 isoelectric focusing of, 43 Analyte focusing behavior, 65 Analytes, dilute, 61 Analytical characterization, 6 Anion chromatofocusing, 266-268, 273, 277, 278 anion-exchange columns used in, 277 buffer interaction model of, 268 column components and consideration for, 277 columns used in, 278 components of, 267 displacement (frontal) model in, 273 Anion gradient chromatofocusing, 277 Anion-exchange chromatofocusing, 11 Anion-exchange column, 267, 268 Anodic mobilization, 188, 199 Anolyte reservoirs, 75 Apparent molecular weights, 126 Arrhenius theory of ionic dissolution, 15 ATIsolatorTM, 221

Band broadening, 217 Batch-to-batch variations, 254 Bead milling, 158 Binary interacting field gradients, 317 Bioaffinity interactions, 203 Biochemical detection (BCD), 231 Biochemical purification, 233

Bio-Gel, 76 Biological samples, 124, 248 cataloging of the different protein species, of, 124 fractionation, 222 prefractionation of, 10, 248 Bio-Lyte, 74 Biomarkers, 249, 256 Broad-range ampholyte IEF, 312 peak capacities for, 312 resolutions for, 312 Buffer capacity, 83, 269, 274 even, 277 Buffer compounds, synthetic, 5 Buffer concentration, 283, 284 Buffer conductivity, 310 Buffer interaction model, 268-270, 274, 287 Buffer mobile phase, 267 Buffering functionalities, 275 Buffers, 81, 82, 97 bifunctional, 81 charged, 71 covalent incorporation into a gel matrix, 81 gradient-forming, 107 in preparative electrophoresis, 84 pK values of, 97 structures of acrylamido buffers, 82 ]3-elimination, 152, 154 protection due to alkylation, 154

Capillary electrophoresis (CE), 7, 31,181 Capillary IEF (clEF), 7, 8, 27, 31, 62, 181, 185-187, 193, 195, 198-201,203,231 advantages and disadvantages of, 8 applications of, 8, 200

capillary selection for, 193 clEF-ESI-MS, 204 clEF-ICP-MS, 205 cIEF-LIF detection system, 203 cIEF-mass spectrometry, 197 cIEF-MS system, 199 coupling to MS, 198 final step in, 187 gels, 77 in microchannels, 199 in micropreparative applications, 186 in proteomics, 203 in the diagnosis of hemoglobin-based blood diseases, 201 increasing local resolution in, 185 internal standards for, 195-196 optimization of, 201 protein solubility in, 195 sample preparation for, 183-185 separation of hemoglobin variants by, 201 with UV detection, 203 Capillary lifetime, 190 Capillary preconditioning, optimization of, 193 Capillary reversed-phase chromatography, 204 Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), 62, 182 Carbamylation, 102, 155, 156 kinetics of, 156 Carrier ampholyte IEF (CA-IEF), 73, 78, 82, 150 compared with IPG-IEF, 82 limitations of, 78, 165 Carrier ampholyte method, 78 limitations of, 78-79 Carrier ampholyte polyacrylamide gel IEF, 111-114

INDEX

323 equipment for, 112 focusing in, 114 gel casting, 112 isoelectric focusing, 113 sample preparation, 113 Carrier ampholytes, 5, 21, 24, 29, 31, 32, 62, 71, 72, 74, 78, 79, 86, 100, 108, 185, 186, 198,202, 252 absorbance of, 202 and ionic strength, 86 batch-to-batch variations of, 31 bounding of, 62 choices of, 100 free, 29 gels, 99 in the generation of pH gradients, 71 isoelectric points of, 24 methods of removal, 79 mixing of, 100 optical absorbance of, 72 preventing entry into the ionization system, 198 properties of, 72 range and complexity of, 185 size distribution of, 78 synthesis of, 24, 29, 74 Carrier ampholytes, synthetic, 71-73, 75, 78 chemical scheme for the synthesis of Ampholine TM, 73 chemical scheme for the synthesis of Servalyt TM, 75 design of, 72 development of, 71-75 differences in performance, 78 mixing of, 78 Carrier buffer focusing, 60 simulation of 2% pharmalyte 3-10, 60 Carrier electrolytes, 63 transient behavior of, 63 Cataloging experiments, 138

using 2-D gels and MS, 138 Cathodic drift, 79, 82, 98, 99, 166, 254, 255 Cathodic mobilization, 188 Catholyte reservoirs, 75 Cation chromatofocusing, 266 CCD camera, 174, 175 schematic diagram of, 175 spatial resolution of, 174 CE system, 183 schematic diagrams of, 183 Cell homogenization, 158 Chaotropes, 6, 7, 149 denaturation in, 7 Chaotropic agent, 155 Thiourea, 155 Chemical mobilization-see Electrophoretic mobilization Chemical polymerization, 100 Chemical species, 51 Chiral compounds, separation of, 239 Chromatofocusing, 9, 10, 32, 265, 266, 268, 272, 276, 277, 290 amphoteric buffer species in, 276 models of, 268 specialized formats of, 277 two modes of, 266 types of separations by, 290 velocity of proteins in, 272 Chromatography, 31 separation procedures, 31 velocity, 301 Clipping, 202 Colloidal CBB staining, 167, 170 Concentration profile, 309 Concentration versus position, 51, 54 obtained from non-uniform and uniform computational grids, 54

transient numerical solutions for, 51 Concentration, 45 Conductivity profiles, 5 Conductivity-gradient focusing (CGF), 307 Conservation relations, 67 and driving electric field, 67 Constant current runs, 132 Constant voltage runs, 132 Contaminants, removal of, 157 Continuous fractionation principle, 232 Continuous free-film electrophoresis, 8 Continuous-flow electrophoresis (CFE), 8, 239 Conventional chromatofocusing, 267-277, 289 separation of multiple protein forms and multiple proteins by, 289 Sluyterman's and Elgersma's theory of, 272 Coolant conductivity, 308 Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB), 167 Counter-acting chromatographic electrophoresis (CACE), 298 Counterflow functions in FFE, 225 Counterflow, 235 Counter-ion atmosphere and ionic migration, theory of, 15 Cross-linking monomers, 130 Cyanate scavenger, 155 Cyanine dyes, 172 Cys residues, 152 Cysteine residues, 127, 128 changes in masses following alkylation, 128 mitigating the reactivity of, 127

324

INDEX

Cysteine, 157 alkylation chemistry of, 157 beta elimination of, 152 chemistry of, 149

2-D electrophoresis, 86, 124, 140, 237, 251, 255 advantages and limitations of, 140 detection limits of, 237 failure in resolving lower abundance proteins, 255 resolution of, 124 2-D gel analysis, 135 2-D gel electrophoresis (2-DE), 197, 233 disadvantages of, 197 sample preparation for, 148 2-D gel-based proteomics, 10 2-D liquid chromatography (2-DLC), 9, 248, 251 2-D PAGE, 158 2-DLC MS, 259 Deamidation, 202 Debye screening length, 54 Dehydro-alanine residues, 153 Density gradient column IEF, 76 Density-gradient centrifugation, 302 Desalting techniques, 184 DeStreak TM, 127 Detection in the low-UV region, 204 Detection methods, review of, 133 Detector assembly, 175 Dextran gels, 110 Dialysis, 184 Differential in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE), 133, 171 benefit of, 135 illustration of techniques, 134

Differential protein solubility, 140 Differential solubility, 257 Diffusion length, characteristic, 59 Diffusion, away from pI, 66 Diffusional band broadening, 205 Dimethylacrylamide (DMA), 255 Dispersion in fluid motion, elimination of, 56 Displacement mechanism of chromatofocusing, 273 Displacement model, 274 Dissociation-association, 53, 54, 56 equilibrium constants for, 56 reactions, 53 Disulfides, sample preparation method for, 149 Dithiothreitol (DTT), 126, 255 DNA sample preparation, 231 Donnan potential, 287, 288 Double one-dimensional electrophoresis, 103 Dual-peak approach, 59, 62 Dual-peak migration, 59 Duracyl TM, 130

Electric charge, conservation relations for, 51 Electric field-gradient focusing (EFGF), 306, 307, 313 disadvantages of, 307 Electrochemical stability, 20 Electrodialysis apparatus, 21 Electrodynamic distortion, 217 Electroendosmosis and electrophoresis, common theory for, 14 Electroendosmosis, 32, 79, 97, 99, 109, 255

Electrofocusing techniques, 2, 11,302 alternate methods, 11 basis for, 2 equation for, 302 Electrohydrodynamic distortion, 217, 218 avoiding, 219 Electrokinetic loading, injection bias of, 186 Electrokinetic mobilization, 31 Electrokinetic separation, 20 Electrolyte conductance, 15 Electromigration, 58, 67 Electromigration-diffusion equation, 52 Electromobility focusing (EMF), 307, 314 Electroneutrality condition of the capillary, 188 Electroosmosis, 14, 56 Electro-osmotic flow (EOF), 77, 182, 217 minimization of, 217 Electrophoresis, 2, 4, 13-18, 30 apparatus of Arne Tiselius, 17 gels, vertical, 105 Helmholtz formulation of, 14 high-voltage, 17 history of, 4, 13-18 in biochemical investigations, 16 in liquids, 14 model, 57 non-linear, 315 resolving power of, 18 Reuss' experimental setup of, 15 theory of, 301 transfer of proteins by, 30 Electrophoretic focusing, 299 of ions (EFI), 20 without the use of pH gradients, 299 Electrophoretic line spectra, 19

INDEX

325 Electrophoretic mobilities, 19, 41, 61, 62, 186, 212, 299, 301,302 and efficacy of IEF, 62 relation to pH, 41, 42 Electrophoretic mobilization, 187, 188, 190, 200, 204 limitation of, 190 principle of, 188 using a zwitterion, 190 Electrophoretic motion versus diffusion, 46 Electrophoretic separations, 6, 48, 51, 53, 70 dynamics of, 53 simulation of, 48 transport of ionic and neutral compounds in, 51 Electrophoretic spectrum, 18 two kinds of, 18 Electrophoretic velocity, 44, 48 expansion in terms of positive, 44 spatial variations of, 48 Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), 231,254 Elution buffers, 268, 273-276, 282 chemical structures of, 275 concentration of, 273 conversion of acidic components to base forms, 276 effect of acidic components in, 282 mobile phase, 268 Elution pH chromatofocusing, 286 Elution pH, 286, 287 by conventional anion chromatofocusing using ampholyte elution buffers vs. IEF pI, 286 Endoosmotic flow (EOF), 126 Enzyme inhibitors, 158

EOF mobilization, 199 Equilibration times, extended, 127 Equilibration, 126, 127 conventional, 126 non conventional, 127 purpose of, 126 single step, 127 Equilibrium focusing, 4 Equilibrium-gradient methods (EGMs), 298 ESI-MS, 254 Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 169 External flow distortion, 218 External pH gradient generation, 277

Faraday's laws of electrolysis, 14 Ferritin concentration versus position, 50 FFE instrumentation, 220-232 basics, 223 Ocotpus, 222 Pro Team TM, 223, 224, 229 schematic of, 224 FFE-FSE, 215 FFE-IEF HPLC coupling, 237, 238 FFE-ITP, 216, 239 quality of the separation in, 216 FFE-ZE, 213, 214 distortion effects, 215 separation scheme of, 215 uses of, 214 FF-IEF 2-DE coupling, 236 FF-IEF, 213, 214, 226, 232-234, 238 advantages of combining with HILIC, 238 compared with 2-D electrophoresis, 234 in proteomics, 233 in the separation of lowmolecular-weight enantiomers, 238 of proteins, 232

separation scheme of, 214 with SDS-PAGE, 233 Fiber-to-fiber variation, 313 Field-flow fractionation (FFF), 11,298, 313 Field-gradient electrofocusing, 298 Field-step electrophoresis (FSE), 9, 239 Filter-paper electrophoresis, 17 First dimension IEF gels, 124 equilibrium of, 124-128 Fluorescent dyes, 170 disadvantages of using, 170 Fluorescent pI markers, 196 Fluorescent protein-protein complexes, 200 separation of, 200 Fluorescent stains, 136, 137 Pro-Q TM Diamond, 137 Pro-Q TM Emerald, 137 three categories of, 169 Fluorophores, 170, 171, 174 detection of, 174 in protein detection, 171 Flux equations, 302, 303, 306 Fluxcorrected transport (FCT), 48 Focal point, 307, 311 Focused peak, width of, 303 Focusing efficacy, and mobility, 62 Focusing electropherogram, 187 Focusing ion exchange, 20 Focusing mechanism in IEF, 1, 2, 304 resolving power of, 304 Focusing space, 63, 64 of 2 % pharmalyte 3-10, 64 Focusing time scales, 65 Focusing, 47, 52, 186-188, 197 and presence of carbonate salts, 186

326

INDEX

current levels during, 188 dynamics of, 4 initial stages of, 187 local pH gradient that precludes, 47 monitoring in real time, 197 of albumin, 52 onset of, 187 Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance MS (FTICR-MS), 199

sensitivity and mass accuracy in, 199 Fractionation, 226 automated, 229 subcellular, 252 Free-flow electrophoresis (FFE), 8, 198, 212, 216-218, 221,230, 239, 252 applications of, 231-239 fractionation unit, 236 high-resolution, 230 IEF separation mode, 213 important practical parameters in, 218 important theoretical parameters in, 216 in space, 221 limitations of, 211 microgravity research, 221 minimization of, 230 non-IEF modes, 238 principle of, 212 prototypes, 226 sample preparation in, 218 separation modes, 212 Free-thiol reagents, 149 Free-zone electrophoresis, 28 FSE-ZE, 239

Gaussian distribution of separands, 66 Gel slurries, recovery of separated proteins from, 8 Gel, prepolymerized, 100

Gel-based IEF, 7, 233 Gelbond PAG film@, 116 GelBondTM PAG film, 85 Gelfiltration, 184 Gel-rod technique, 94 Gels, 17, 130 capability of resolution in, 17 cassette, 98 electrophoresis, 212 filtration, 288 homogeneous single percentage versus porosity gradients, 130 matrix, 97-98 monomer concentration, 129 polymerization, 100, 102 reproducibility, 137 Gels, lab-cast, thickness of, 101 Gels, small polyacrylamide, 107 IEF of human sera and cerebrospinal fluid in, 107 Gels, ultrathin, advantages of, 101 Gel-to-gel variation, 135, 136, 138 Genomics, 9, 247 Glycosylation, 173, 202 Grad(E) focusing, 313 Grad(T) focusing, 314 Grad(U) focusing, 313 Grad(cr) focusing, 314 Gradient anion chromatofocusing, 279, 280 compared with salt gradient anion exchange chromatography, 280 setup for, 279 Gradient chromatofocusing, 277, 279-282, 284 advantages over conventional chromatofocusing, 280-282 compared with conventional chromatofocusing, 281

effect of different concentrations of buffer components, 284 elution buffer system used in, 279 focusing capability of, 279 Gradient drift, 97 Gradient flattening, 81 Gradient stabilization, 76 Gradient-elution chromatographies, 11, 302 Gradiflow, 252, 253, 255, 258 Grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY), 161 Gravity mobilization, 191

Hemoglobins, 201 Henry's f function, 55 High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 7, 181 High-throughput analysis, 105 High-throughput slab gel IEF, 105 schematic drawing of a setup for, 105 Hjert4n, Stellan, 27 Hollow fiber microdialysis system, 199 Homogeneous single percentage gels, 130 Homogenization, 158 Horizontal flatbed chambers, 99 Hydraulic mobilization, 187, 190 Hydrodynamic distortion, 216 Hydrodynamic mobility, 55 Hydrodynamic mobilization, 31 Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), 235 applications of, 235 Hydrophobic interaction chromatography, 289 Hydrophobic retention, 288

327

INDEX

Hydrophobicity characterization, 290 Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), 192, 217

IEF buffer, 58 concentration evolution, 57 dynamics of, 58, 59 commercial, 57 IEF gel electrophoresis, 12, 172, 176 foundation technology of, 176 IEF gels, 97, 101, 106, 172, 176 conductivity of, 97 detection approaches in, 176 staining of, 106 ultrathin-layer, 101 use of cyanine dyes in, 172 denaturing, 104 native, 104 IEF in 0.5-mm thin polyacrylamide gels, 104 electrode solutions for, 104 IEF in granulated gels, 111 IEF in immobilized pH gradients, 108 IEF in two-dimensional electrophoresis, 254-259 IEF slab gel, 113-115 assembly of a cassette for casting, 113 polymerization of, 114 power supply settings for, 114 sample application on, 115 schematic drawing of apparatus, 96 IEF with carrier ampholytes, 79 limitations of, 79 IEF with immobilized pH gradients, 86 limitations of, 86

IEF-based prefractionation, 254 Imaging clEF, 196, 197 advantage of, 197 block diagram of, 196 Immobiline II, 30 Immobilines| 116, 305, 315 ImmobilineTM, 81, 85 Immobilized metal-affinity chromatography (IMAC), 251 Immobilized pH gradient (IPG) gel electrophoresis, 166 Immobilized pH gradient (IPG), 28, 81-83, 85, 124, 149, 248 focusing positions of proteins in, 82 modeling of, 83 practical aspects of, 85-87 Immobilized pH gradient IEF (IPG-IEF), 81, 82, 86, 115-117, 119, 254 casting of, 117, 118 compared with CA-IEF, 82 current and voltage requirements for, 86 equipment for, 116 gel casting, 116 isoelectric focusing in, 119 polymerization in, 117 preparation of the cassette, 116 recipe for starting solutions for, 117 rehydration of, 118, 119 sample preparation, 119 Immunoblotting, 107 Immunofixation, 106, 110 Inhibitors, 158 Inter-laboratory comparison, 31 Internal pH gradient, 269, 272, 273, 283 characterization of, 273 generation of, 267 slope of, 273, 283

Ion exchangers, mixed-bed, 155

Ion suppression, 172 Ion trap MS, 203 Ion-addition mobilization-see

Electrophoretic mobilization Ion-exchange chromatography, 10, 265 column for, 32 using a pH gradient, 265 Ion-exchange columns, 11 Ionogenic mass-action equilibria, 51 Ionic concentrations, initial conditions for, 56 Ionic coupling, 315 Ionic detergents, 149 Ionic impurities, effect of, 218 Ionogenic dissociation-association equilibria, 52 Ionogenic species, conservation laws for, 67 Ions in solution, migration rates of, 15 IPG gels, precast, 85, 86 IPG strip pore size, 258 IPG-IEF, 254 Isoelectric ampholytes, 21 Isoelectric condensation, 20 Isoelectric evacuation, 20 Isoelectric focusing (IEF), 1, 6, 43, 239 advances in, 12 ampholyte-based, 315, 316 as a separation concept, 33 automation of, 182 broad and narrow pH range, 139 compared to other separation methods, 1-3 contact fluids for, 104 current density kinetics, 65 defined, 69 dissipating heat in, 96 effect of sample preparation on, 6 evolution and development of, 3

3~8

INDEX

fluorescent dye for, 106 focusing space, 62 for prefractionation, 252 illustrative simulations of, 57-67 in a PDMS MEMS channel, 304 in resolution, 97 modes not requiring carrier ampholytes, 79-81 numerical simulation of, 5, 51-57 of hydrophobic membrane proteins, 140 practice and theory of, 31 proteomics aspects of, 9 protocols, multi-step, 97 reproducible mode, 222 resolution, 66, 101,305, 317 sample preparation for, 148 sample, standard, 149 steady-state, 149 techniques, liquid-based, 219 theory and simulation of, 4-5 underlying principles of, 3 Isoelectric fractionation, 74, 84, 257 Isoelectric line spectra, 4 Isoelectric point marker proteins, 170, 171 staining of, 171 Isoelectric point markers, 107 Isoelectric point vs. mobilization time, 190 Isoelectric points (pI), 2, 4, 7, 18, 21, 32, 41, 42, 57, 72, 79, 100, 102, 104, 111,182, 192, 283, 298 accurate determination of, 192 and ampholyte position, 72 apparent pI, 283 characterization, 290 defined, 41, 104 determination, 283

deviations from, 288 in native gels, 102 in urea gels, 102 pI-based fractionation, 290 selection of defined ranges, 100 separation, 10, 266 Isoelectric precipitation, 300 Isoelectric prefractionation, 255, 256 Isoelectric separation, 29, 94 disc electrophoresis equipment for, 94 free carrier ampholytes in, 29 Isoforms, fractionation of, 313 ISO-DALT system, 30 Iso-pH lines, distortion of, 103 IsoPrimeT M instrument, 85 IsoprimeTM,221 Isotachophoresis (ITP), 9, 62, 204, 239, 302 Isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT), 157, 248 ITP/CZE separations, 204

Laminar-flow band broadening, 196 Laser scanner, 173, 174 commonly used light sources for, 174 Laser-induced fluorescence, 200, 231 detection, 182 LC-MS ICAT, 157 Leading buffer ion, 131 LIF detection, 195 Ligand identification, 203 structural information for, 203 Ligand-receptor binding, 203 LIMS system, 226 Liquid chromatography, 212, 222 Liquid-based IEF methods, 222 Liquid-phase IEF, 253 Liquid-phase separations, 204 Low-abundance proteins (LAP), 298

Macromolecule-ligand interactions, 32 Joule heating, 216, 228 dissipation of, 229

Kohlrausch's laws, 15 Kolin, Alexander, 4, 19 Kolin's isoelectric spectra, 18 Kolin's separation cell gradients acting in, 19

Labeling methods, 133, 172 metabolic labeling methods, 133 preseparation labeling, 133 Label-less detection, 172 Laemmli system, alternatives to, 131 Laminar flow, 216, 227 controlling, 227

Macromolecule-macromol-

ecule interactions, 32 MALDI-TOF, 254 MALDI-TOF-MS, 172 MALDI-TOF-MS-based peptide mass analysis, 168 Maleimide-reactive dyes, 135 Marker proteins, 107 Mass action relations, 54, 67 Mass flux equation, 301 Mass spectrometry (MS), 6, 8, 124, 135, 148, 212, 247, 297 Mass transport, 53 Maxwell's equations, 46 MCE electrophoresis, 152 Membrane proteins, 161, 162 recovery of, 161

~-9

INDEX

Micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), 204 Microchannel device, 199 Microcolumn chromatofocusing, 277 Microdialysis (MD)system, on-line, 198 Microfluidic devices, 230 Microfluidic technologies, 230 Microgravity, and sedimentation, 219 Microheterogeneity, 202 cIEF in detection of, 202 Micromodule fraction separator (MFS), 231 Micro-range 2-DE, 253 Micro-range IPG 2-DE, 253, 257 utility of, 257 Micro-range IPGs, 256 Micro-range zoom IPG 2DE, 255 Micro-scale applications, 310 Minimal labeling, 135 Mobile phase, 274, 279, 282, 283 buffer capacity in, 274, 283 components, 274 concentration of the buffer in, 282 distribution of components, 274 for anion gradient chromatofocusing, 279 transfers of, 269 velocity, 272 Mobile-phase buffers, examples of, 282 Mobilization techniques, 187 Mobilization velocity, modulation of, 191 Molecular weight characterization, 290 Monoclonal antibodies, characterization of, 202 MS-based protein identification techniques, 170

Multi-compartment electrolyzers (MCE), 9, 212 Multi-dimensional chromatography, 248 Multiphor II IEF chamber, 96 Myoglobin peptide, MS analysis of, 156

N-acryloylaminoethoxyethanol (AAEE), 255 Narrow-range ampholyte IEF, 312 peak capacities for, 312 resolution for, 312 Navier-Stokes equations, 55 Non-amphoteric elution buffer, 276 Non-amphoteric solutes, 300 Non-equilibrium pH gradient electrophoresis ' (NEPHGE), 79, 255 Non-ionic surfactants, 149 Non-linear IEF, 304 Normal-phase chromatography, 235 Nucleic acid removal, 157, 159 centrifugal methods, 159 enzymatic methods of, 159 Nucleic acid shearing, 158 Ohm's law, 14, 132 Organelles, 252 fractionation, 251 prefractionation of, 252 separations, 222 Organic dye staining, 166-167 Organic modifiers, 195 Organic solvents, precipitation from, 160 Ornstein and Davis system, 131 Outlet pH gradient, characterization of, 273

Paper chromatography, 176 Particle sedimentation, 219 Pattern matching, 31 Peak capacity, 313, 314 effect of decreasing dispersion, 313 local adjustment of, 314 Peak shape, 45 Peak widths, 45, 288 dependence on flow rate, 288 Peak, location and spatial variance of, 303 Peclet number, 46, 65 and dispersion of focused zones, 65 Peptides, 102, 202 analysis of, 202 detection of, 102 immunodetection of, 31 Peptidomics, 251 Performance test, 226, 228 Periodic acid Schiff's base (PAS) conjugation mechanism, 173 Petrov-Galerkin finite elements, 48, 51 pH band, velocity of, 272 pH change, buffering of, 268 pH gradient, steady, focusing transients in, 46 pH gradients, 4, 10, 18, 26, 46, 59, 69-72, 75, 76, 78-83, 85, 94, 97, 103, 107, 184, 185, 213, 230, 252, 254, 266, 269, 274, 276, 282, 283, 285, 288 ampholyte-generated, 71 artificial, 18, 70, 71, 72 carrier ampholyte-generated, 75, 76, 82 cathodic drift in, 79 compression of, 184 confinement in the effective length of the capillary, 185 continuous, 269 destabilization of, 254 development, 67

330

INDEX differences in development for chromatofocusing and IEF, 276 discontinuities in carrier ampholyte-generated ones, 78 discontinuous, 85 effect on peak width, 288 electrolysis-mediated generation of, 230 generating shallow gradients, 283 generation of linear pH gradients, 266, 274, 282 generation of, 5, 26, 46 generation without the use of carrier ampholytes, 80 immobilized, 5, 7, 46, 81-84, 107 in the early history of IEF, 70-71 influence of buffer concentration on outlet, 283 instability, 166 internally and externally generated, 266 isoelectric focusing in, 80 linear, 59, 213, 252 methods for producing wider ranges, 83 modification for the separation of hemoglobin variants, 103 natural, 70, 71 non-linear, 31, 83 reason for instability of, 97 reproducibility, 69 requirements for IEF separations, 69 source of irregularities in, 282 stable, 42, 46 theoretical, 32 with carrier ampholytes, 94 pH in a segment, equation for, 269

pH in weak anion-exchange column, 270 example calculations of, 270 pH linear gradients, 275 mobile-phase buffers generating, 275 pH = pI zone, 269, 272, 275 pH, 41 relation to electrophoretic mobility, 41, 42 pH/Rf curves, 20 PharmalyteTM, 74 Phase boundary effects, 218 Phenotyping, 103 Pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs), 233 Phosphatase inhibitors, 158 Phosphines, 149 Phosphorylation, 173 Photopolymerization, 100 pI-see Isoelectric points Piperazine diacrylamide (PDA), 130 Plateau phenomenon, 97 Polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels, 7 Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, 130 cross-linking reagent for, 130 two-dimensional, 3 Polyacrylamide gel matrix, 85 Polyacrylamide gel (PAG), 17, 30, 46, 76, 84, 98-108, 128, 129, 170 composition of monomer (%T) and cross-linker (%C), 129 composition of, 98 immunofixation of, 106 polymerization of, 100 preparation of gel solutions for, 128 protein detection with, 106 T and C values of, 99

Polyacrylamide slab gel IEF, 27, 111 experimental protocols for, 111-120 Polyacrylamide slab gels, 93, 108 fixed buffering groups in, 108 Polyampholytes, 275 buffers, 268, 281 chemical structures of, 275 Polymerization, 113, 129 choice of method, 100 delay due to oxygen, 129 in polyacrylamide slab gel IEF, 113 initiators, 98 overnight, 99 Polymerized gels, 111 Polypeptides, 126 aggregation, 127 hydrodynamic shape and mobility, 126 Porosity gradient gels, 130 Postseparation detection, 136 Post-translational modifications (PTM), 148, 202, 248 detection, 172 Post-translational protein modification, 138 Power control in electrophoresis, 132 Pre-concentration, 21 Prefocusing, 104, 105, 114 Pre-fractionation, 150, 234, 248, 251-253, 258 approaches to, 234 based on pI, 253 chromatographic approach to, 251 complexity reduction via, 150 high-resolution, 9 IEF for, 252-254 IEF-based devices, 248, 252 of organelles, 252 of protein mixtures, 8

INDEX

331

Preparative electrophoresis, 84 using buffering membranes, 84 Preparative IEF, 8, 84 use of immobilized buffers in, 84-85 Preparative isoelectric fractionation, 140 Preparative separations, highly resolving, 80 PrepCell, 259 Press-blotting, 31 Pressure mobilization, 191, 199 Pro Team TM, 226 Prolytes TM, defined, 213 Pro Team TM FFE separation chamber, 225 Protease inhibitors, 158 Protein carryover, 250 Protein complex disruption, 6 non-ionic or zwitterionic reagents in, 6 Protein ion vacuum, 20 Protein isoforms, 6, 124 post-translationally modified, 6, 124 separations of 82 Protein mixtures, prefractionation of, 8 Protein oligomers, 102 Protein peaks, dependence on Donnan potential, 288 Protein precipitation, 237 loss of resolution due to, 237 minimizing, 195 Protein processing system, 226 Protein properties, 49 Protein samples, dilution of, 232 Protein sequence information, 148 Protein species, qualitative cataloging of, 6 Protein therapeutics, 202 Protein turnover, 138 Protein visualization, 133, 173

imaging instruments for, 173 Protein-enzyme complexes, 102 Protein-protein additives, 102 Proteins PTMs, nature of, 251 Proteins, 3, 5, 6, 18, 26, 30, 32, 62, 63, 70, 71, 96, 97, 102, 105, 106, 110, 115, 124, 128, 133-136, 138, 148, 160, 166,

168, 169, 172, 184, 192, 194, 220, 223, 232, 234, 248, 250, 255, 257, 259, 274, 283-285, 290 aggregation and precipitation of, 105 blotting of, 30 capillary IEF using gravity mobilization, 192 capillary IEF using single-step gravity cIEF, 194 cataloging of, 138 change of charges on, 148 characterization glycoforms of, 202, 290 characterizing high-and low-abundance proteins, 259 charge state of, 285 concentration, 184 denatured, 102 detection and imaging, 7 detection by colloidal coomassie brilliant blue staining, 115 detection by silver staining, 136 detection in 2-DE, 133 detection in IEF gels, 7 detection sensitivity, 140 detection using agarose gels, 110 detection using polyacrylamide gels, 106 difference between chromatofocusing elution pH and IEF pI, 284

direct detection in polyacrylamide gels, 172 effect of buffer concentration on separation of, 283 electrophoretic separations of, 71 elution by chelation of metal ions, 169 elution pH in chromatofocusing, 285 extraction, 158 FE-IEF of, 232 fluorescent detection of, 166 focusing of oxygen-sensitive proteins, 96 focusing of, 63 focusing under native conditions, 102 following up genetic mutants of, 32 high-resolution separation of, 30, 248 human serum proteins, 30 hydrophobic interior of, 6 hydrophobic separation of, 102 identifying charge isomers of, 3 IEF separation of, 62 low abundance, 255 mobilities as a function of pH and ionic strength, 52 non-radioactive detection of, 168 pI dependent separation of, 220, 223 pI values of conformational isomers, 148 pK values of, 97 precipitation of, 184 reason for poor transfer from IPG to the SDS-PAGE gel, 128 separation and concentration of, 18 separation in chromatofocusing, 11 separation in density gradients, 26

332

INDEX

separation in proteomics projects, 248 separation of alkaline proteins, 255 separation on the basis of their pI values, 274 separation with a discontinuous buffer system, 6, 70, 130, 231 solubility and stability of, 70, 80, 160 solubilization of insoluble proteins, 147 solubilization of, 283 steady-state distributions of, 5 subcellular fractionation of, 250 temperature-sensitive, 102 transfer between gel dimensions, 128 transfer to second dimension SDSPAGE gel, 124 using FFE for the prefractionation of, 234 visualization of, 134 with high and low molecular masses, 257 Proteome analysis, 10 automation of, 226 Proteome coverage, best possible, 248 Proteome inventory, 140 Proteome, 133, 247 measuring rapid changes in, 133 ProteomeLab TM PF 2D system, 290 Proteomic analyses, 85, 138 classes of, 138 prefractionation method for, 85 Proteomics and FF-IEF, 233 Proteomics applications, 254 problems with 2-DE technology, 254

Proteomics experiment, schematic representation of, 250 Proteomics workflow, 249-251 Proteomics, 3, 9, 127, 290 definition of, 9, 247 new alkylating reagents for, 127 problems in, 248 use of chromatofocusing, 290 ProXPRESS TM 2D Proteomic Imaging System, 174 PTM, 257 mass spectrometric characterization of, 257

Radiolabeling, 169 Radiolabeling-see Labeling methods Reagent purity, 218 Recycling isoelectric focusing (RIEF), 221 Reducing agents, 149 types of, 149 Reductants, 102 use in gel monomer mixtures, 102 Reduction and alkylation, 150-152, 155 drawback of, 155 methodology of, 152 Rehydration, 100, 118 RepelsilaneTM, 116 Reproducibility, 226 Residues, 152, 155 Cys residues, 152 dehydro-alanine residues, 152 relative reactivity of, 155 Resolution, 306, 307, 309, 311,313, 314 effect of decreasing dispersion, 313 local adjustment of, 314 mathematical forms for, 309 ResolyteTM, 74 Reverse staining, 169 RF3 TM, 221

Rhinohide TM, 130 Righetti, Pier Giorgio, 3, 29 Rilbe, Harry (see Svensson) Rotofor TM, 76, 80, 221, 252, 253 Rotolyte TM, 80 RP-HPLC, 222 Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg (RKF) algorithm, 57 Run-to-run variation, 168

Salt gradient ion-exchange chromatography, 265 Salt gradient profile, 307 Salt-elution ion exchange, 288 Sample preparation, 6, 156, 183 basic recommendation for, 156 for cIEF, 183 in 2-DE, 124 practices and pitfalls of, 6 storage of samples, 156 Sample throughput, 105 doubling, 105 increase in, 229 Sample-ampholyte interactions, 193 Samples, 139 coping with large numbers of, 139 homogenization, 157 introduction, 185 multiplex analysis of, 136 pre fractionation, 140 precipitation, 219 processing, 158 protein concentration of, 184 recovery of, 232 time needed for fractionation, 232 Saturation labeling, 135 SDS-PAGE gels, 129, 130 recipe for casting, 129 SDS-PAGE separations, 78 SDS-polyacrylamide gels, 173 Sedimentation, 219, 225 avoiding, 225

INDEX

333

Sensitivity, 226 Separation buffer, 218 conductivity of, 218 considerations in selection, 218 Separation chamber, 44, 226, 228 loss of species in, 44 performance of, 228 quality control tests for, 226 Separation channel, change in conductivity in, 308 Separation matrix, fixed changes in, 97 Separation methods, 2 Separation time, in slab gel IEF, 119 Separation, 2-D, range for, 132 Separation, 5, 69, 72, 217 by IEF, 2 distortion due to Joule heating, 217 effect of nature of the pH gradient, 5 high-throughput, 9, 239 pI-dependent, 219 quality and usefulness of, 69 resolution of, 72 size-based, 6 SephadexTM,76 Sequential extraction, 162 Sequential solubilization, 249 Serum proteins, complex nature of, 16 Servalyt, 74 SH alkylation, 151 SH-SY5Y cell lysates, 160 Silver stain kits, 169 Silver staining, 136, 166-170 disadvantages of, 168 for IEF gels, 106 two categories of, 168 Simulations, non-linear, physicochemical parameters for, 62 Single-step cIEF, 187, 191, 193, 194, 196, 199 capillary length in, 194

with EOF mobilization, 191 with hydraulic mobilization, 193 Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), 299 Slab gel IEF, 5, 94, 95 equipment for, 95 first apparatus for, 94 Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 148, 161 Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), 3, 6, 103, 123, 128-132, 166, 172, 197, 226, 248, 251,259 electrical considerations in controlling, 132 Solid-phase-extraction (SPE), 235 Solubilizing power, 150 Solutal concentrations, 55 local variations of, 55 Solute, focal point of, 301 Spacer, 185 Spatial variance, 306, 307, 309, 311 mathematical forms for, 309 Spermine treatment, 160 Spot identification, 31 Spot position reproducibility, 137 Stable isotope labelingbased quantitation, 157 Stained gels, 173 acquiring images from, 173-175 Staining, 76, 106, 167 in 2-DE, 136 with organic dyes, 167 Steady-state rheoelectrolysis, 80 Stokes radius of protein, 55 Stokes radius, 126 Stripe test, 226, 227 Subcellular fractionation, 252, 257 Subcellular proteomics, 251

Subproteomics approach, 249 Sucrose density gradient, 76, 93 Surfactants, 149 non-ionic, 195 Svensson, Harry (aka Svensson-Rilbe), 4, 21, 22 SWISS-2DPAGE database, 138 Synthetic buffering molecules, 5 SYPRO Ruby dye, 170 SYPRO| Orange, 136 SYPRO| Red, 136 SYPRO| Ruby, 137 System biology, tools for, 298

Target solutes, 311, 312, 315 average mobility of, 312 electrophoretic velocity of, 311 lability of, 315 Taylor dispersion, 301 Temperature-gradient focusing, 309 Tertiary interacting field gradients, 317 Tetramethylethylenediamie (TEMED), 98 Thales of Miletus, 14 Thermal distortion, 216, 228 measures to reduce, 217 minimization of, 228 Thermostatic circulator, 96 Thin-layer chromatography, 20, 176 Thin-layer electrophoresis, 94 Time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer, 198 Tiselius, Arne, 16 Tissue disintegration, 158 Tissue grinding, 158 Titration curves, 32 pK and pI values from, 32 Trailing ion, 131

334

INDEX

Transmembrane proteins, 161 Tributyl phosphine (TBP), 127, 149, 255 Tris/glycine/chloride buffer system, 130 Tube gel IEF, 124 Two-dimensional electrophoresis, high resolution, 108, 111 Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), 6, 30, 123, 124, 137, 166, 247, 254 protein separation using, 125 resolving capacity of, 6 Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-D PAGE), 27, 148, 298 shortcomings of, 298 Two-step cIEF, 187, 198, 204

separation of proteins in human plasma, 204 Ultrafiltration (UF), 184, 235, 305 Ultrasonic probing, 158 Ultrathin-layer gels, 102 Urea, degradation of, 155 Vacuum mobilization, 191 Valences, effective, 56 Valences, mean square, 56 Velocity-gradient focusing, 305 Vertical slab gel electrophoresis, 99 Vesterberg, Olof Alfred Yngve, 23 Vesterberg's synthesis, 21 Visible staining methods, 136 Voltaic pile, 14

Voltage ramping conditions, 184 optimization for different salt concentrations, 184

Water, electrolysis of, 70 Weak anion-exchange column segments, 271 equilibrium pH of, 271

ZE separations, 230 Zone electrophoresis (ZE), 9, 239 Zone sedimentation, 219 Zwitterionic detergents, 149 Zymogram techniques, 101, 106